alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 430.16

 429.92

 429.75

 429.55

 429.40

 429.12

 428.91

 428.71

 428.40

 427.90

 427.10

 426.36

 425.66

 424.88

 424.08

 423.27

 422.45

 421.58

 420.72

 419.90

 419.10

 418.29

 417.48

 416.87

 416.06

 415.42

 414.93

 414.35

 413.75

 413.04

 615.1

 612.9

 611.4

 609.6

 608.3

 605.8

 604.0

 602.2

 599.5

 595.1

 588.1

 581.6

 575.6

 568.9

 562.0

 555.2

 548.3

 541.0

 533.9

 527.2

 520.6

 514.1

 507.6

 502.7

 496.3

 491.3

 487.4

 482.9

 478.3

 472.8

STORAGE

-2.0

-2.1

-1.5

-1.8

-1.3

-2.5

-1.9

-1.8

-2.7

-4.4

-7.0

-6.4

-6.1

-6.7

-6.8

-6.9

-6.9

-7.3

-7.1

-6.7

-6.5

-6.6

-6.5

-4.9

-6.4

-5.0

-3.8

-4.5

-4.6

-5.5

CHANGE

1,736

1,644

1,825

1,552

1,788

1,397

1,564

1,565

1,571

1,692

1,557

1,607

1,290

1,430

1,270

1,319

1,153

918

1,282

1,105

1,245

1,360

1,155

1,317

841

1,146

1,335

1,359

1,178

933

INFLOW

 2,389

 2,378

 2,241

 2,103

 2,103

 2,290

 2,136

 2,084

 2,562

 3,536

 4,690

 4,455

 3,952

 4,414

 4,345

 4,393

 4,262

 4,193

 4,496

 4,117

 4,125

 4,254

 4,050

 3,414

 3,749

 3,325

 2,938

 3,284

 3,168

 3,335

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 272

 277

 269

 269

 269

 273

 281

 288

 294

 286

 283

 295

 302

 301

 292

 295

 287

 304

 293

 296

 308

 303

 301

 296

 285

 283

 298

 287

 286

 289

PUMPING

 69

 71

 77

 77

 89

 89

 86

 83

 94

 91

 114

 99

 86

 95

 74

 88

 79

 81

 83

 91

 101

 106

 84

 64

 45

 74

 37

 63

 68

 67

C.F.S.

 .23

 .24

 .26

 .26

 .30

 .30

 .29

 .28

 .32

 .31

 .39

 .34

 .30

 .33

 .26

 .31

 .28

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .37

 .39

 .31

 .24

 .17

 .28

 .14

 .24

 .26

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 8, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -144.2 41,134 102,781 0 0 8,662 2,425 8.58 .00

ACRE-FEET -144,200 81,589 203,866 0 0 17,181 4,810

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 203,866

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 17,181

TOTAL 221,047

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = 14.69

 617.1

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of Amanda 

Nicole Fannin and Cavin Reed Fannin and 

In the Interest of E.M.F., a Minor Child

No. 06-16-00018-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15-D0814-CCL). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the joint motion of the parties to 

dismiss the appeal by agreement should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that each party shall bear its own costs of appeal.

RENDERED MAY 24, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,180

 1,162

 1,009

 1,208

 825

 1,438

 1,877

 1,803

 1,985

 2,131

 2,139

 1,624

 1,387

 1,643

 1,631

 3,666

 1,649

 2,003

 1,582

 1,368

 837

 503

 440

 331

 292

 235

 278

 254

 214

 165

 215

 286

 275

 277

 288

 312

 321

 354

 373

 414

 433

 521

 379

 404

 360

 382

 267

 264

 264

 281

 265

 297

 285

 270

 242

 219

 200

 171

 140

 144

 147

 151

 429

 404

 366

 478

 430

 602

 704

 754

 816

 857

 1,012

 633

 669

 665

 719

 1,178

 654

 619

 547

 473

 413

 327

 321

 280

 239

 216

 203

 179

 164

 155

 171

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 27, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,877

 5,880

 5,814

 5,826

 5,757

 5,857

 6,091

 6,389

 6,769

 7,250

 7,908

 8,210

 8,539

 8,819

 9,109

 9,883

 10,171

 10,312

 10,429

 10,300

 10,009

 9,582

 9,087

 8,510

 7,737

 7,320

 6,854

 6,368

 5,813

 4,790

 4,307

 420

 420

 415

 416

 411

 418

 435

 456

 484

 518

 565

 586

 610

 630

 651

 706

 727

 737

 745

 736

 715

 684

 649

 608

 553

 523

 490

 455

 415

 342

 308

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 22, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President), 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Paul R. Boeding and Marilyn E. Boeding,*                     both of Seneca, Kansas; to acquire control of Baileyville Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of Baileyville State Bank, both in Seneca, Kansas.                

                    2.                     *Todd L. Sutherland,*                     Lawrence, Kansas, individually and as trustee of the Todd L. Sutherland 2005 Revocable Trust; to acquire control of Lawrence Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire control of The University National Bank of Lawrence, both in Lawrence, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-8289 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
. 

. . . . 

: 

. ..i...’ 

OFFICE OF THE A-fTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

.-., 

Opln 9 

Rnr COUnfj 

6 county.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 849

 833

 835

 840

 822

 845

 828

 835

 825

 809

 813

 831

 830

 830

 833

 824

 837

 835

 837

 852

 876

 901

 928

 945

 955

 984

 1,000

 1,005

 1,024

 1,027

 1,045

 708

 686

 685

 694

 687

 700

 713

 722

 734

 668

 458

 624

 645

 658

 658

 654

 654

 604

 634

 635

 708

 686

 755

 750

 750

 740

 794

 826

 831

 833

 829

 774

 754

 748

 746

 741

 761

 760

 770

 772

 752

 704

 730

 718

 712

 710

 723

 724

 717

 726

 753

 777

 806

 820

 832

 834

 856

 875

 895

 911

 922

 929

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert deRose, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Education Lending Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date: October 23, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert deRose
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:            
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Walter A. Shephard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 17, 2010

/s/ Walter A. Shephard  Walter A. ShephardVice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer ofZygo Corporation
### Part B—Instructional Programs in Technology Education
Exhibit 10.3 Letter Agreement Mark Morelli


Exhibit 10.3





June 4, 2015


Mark D. Morelli


Dear Mark:


This letter is intended to modify and amend the offer letter dated December 1, 2011 (the “Offer Letter”) between Brooks Automation, Inc. (“Brooks”) and you.  In light of your continued performance in the senior executive role as President and Chief Operating Officer, Brooks has agreed to modify certain terms of offer letter relating to your eligibility for salary continuation in the event there is a termination of your employment as set forth below.
The second paragraph of Section 5 of the Offer Letter is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following new paragraphs:
“If Brooks terminates your employment without “cause” (as defined in Brooks’ equity grant documents), or you terminate your employment for “good reason” (as defined below), you will be eligible for salary continuation payments at your then current base salary for a period of twelve months from your termination date.  If you have not secured employment following the initial 12 months of salary continuation, Brooks will continue your salary on a bi-weekly basis for up to 12 additional months while you are not employed.  In addition, you will continue to be covered under the Company’s medical, dental and vision plans at the same contribution level as current active employees.  In exchange, you agree to sign the Company’s customary Separation Agreement and Waiver of Claims.  For the sake of clarity, the salary continuation benefits described above shall not apply to any termination of employment that triggers a payment to you under the Change in Control Agreement dated as of June 4, 2015 between you and the Company.
For purposes hereof, “good reason” shall mean, without your express written consent, the occurrence of any of the following:  (i) a material breach by the Company of any agreement that exists between you and the Company; (ii) a diminution of your responsibilities and authority resulting in responsibilities and authority in material respects inconsistent with the responsibilities and authority of the role of President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company; (iii) a reduction of your base salary or of any material employee benefit enjoyed by you unless all senior executives of the Company suffer a substantially similar reduction; or (iv) a relocation of your office to a location more than 60 miles from the Company’s headquarters in Chelmsford, Massachusetts.”
Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions contained in your Offer Letter remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter by signing and returning a copy hereof.
Sincerely yours,




William T. Montone
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
#### V. J. Hedden & Sons Company, Respondent, v. Harris Wolff, Appellant.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 900

 863

 880

 881

 828

 744

 758

 754

 756

 800

 844

 900

 930

 980

 1,093

 1,103

 1,071

 1,047

 1,067

 1,165

 1,290

 1,359

 1,639

 1,723

 1,881

 2,135

 2,045

 1,817

 1,876

 2,050

 2,167

 527

 518

 533

 529

 499

 510

 500

 499

 498

 506

 512

 538

 538

 546

 535

 569

 557

 583

 604

 622

 641

 645

 696

 737

 761

 847

 780

 820

 852

 809

 972

 649

 640

 665

 682

 636

 600

 582

 572

 588

 625

 651

 666

 669

 711

 756

 754

 747

 759

 783

 809

 841

 863

 954

 1,043

 1,178

 1,204

 1,134

 1,125

 1,152

 1,258

 1,385

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 9,990

 9,893

 9,861

 9,856

 9,773

 9,606

 9,429

 9,267

 9,107

 8,994

 8,920

 8,889

 8,884

 8,936

 9,043

 9,157

 9,239

 9,316

 9,463

 9,672

 9,931

 10,222

 10,588

 11,006

 11,533

 12,071

 12,536

 12,950

 13,346

 13,850

 14,488

 714

 707

 704

 704

 698

 686

 674

 662

 651

 642

 637

 635

 635

 638

 646

 654

 660

 665

 676

 691

 709

 730

 756

 786

 824

 862

 895

 925

 953

 989

 1,035

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 23.1 Consent of Robert Early & Company, P.C.








          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-105591 regarding the Stock Compensation
Plan of KleenAir Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2004 which
is being included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB of KleenAir Systems,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.




/s/ ROBERT EARLY & COMPANY, P.C.
Robert Early & Company, P.C.

Abilene, Texas
April 13, 2004























                             EXHIBIT 23.1
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.72 Application of surety for relief from bond.

A surety on any bond given on Forms 5100.30 or 5110.67, may at any time in writing notify the principal and the appropriate TTB officer that he desires, after a date named, to be relieved of liability under said bond. Such date shall be not less than 90 days after the date the notice is received by the appropriate TTB officer. The surety shall also file with the appropriate TTB officer an acknowledgment or other proof of service on the principal. If such notice is not thereafter in writing withdrawn, the rights of the principal as supported by said bond shall be terminated on the date named in the notice, and the surety shall be relieved from liability to the extent set forth in § 28.73(b).

(68A Stat. 749, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6065); Sec. 201. Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1336, as amended, 1352, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062, 5175))

[T.D. 6895, 31 FR 11976, Sept. 13, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71722, Dec. 11, 1979; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
### §1617. Compromise of Government claims by Secretary of the Treasury

Upon a report by a customs officer, United States attorney, or any special attorney, having charge of any claim arising under the customs laws, showing the facts upon which such claim is based, the probabilities of a recovery and the terms upon which the same may be compromised, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to compromise such claim, if such action shall be recommended by the General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §617, 46 Stat. 757; May 10, 1934, ch. 277, §512(b), 48 Stat. 759; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 869; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(gg), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §617, 42 Stat. 987. That section was superseded by section 617 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to customs officer for reference to collector and struck out reference to customs agents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney". See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Note thereunder.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

Act May 10, 1934, ch. 277, §512(b), 48 Stat. 759, abolished offices of General Counsel and Assistant General Counsel for Bureau of Internal Revenue, and office of Solicitor and Assistant Solicitor of the Treasury and transferred powers, duties, and functions thereof to General Counsel for Department of the Treasury.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of the Treasury, General Counsel of Department of the Treasury, or Department of the Treasury under this section with respect to functions transferred to Secretary of Commerce in sections 1303 and 1671 et seq. of this title by section 5(a)(1)(C) of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1979 were transferred to Secretary of Commerce pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1979, §5(a)(1)(C), 44 F.R. 69275, 93 Stat. 1381, eff. Jan. 2, 1980, as provided by section 1–107(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12188, Jan. 2, 1980, 45 F.R. 993, set out as notes under section 2171 of this title.
### Division 7—Preeligibility Form
#### John W. Kerwin, an Infant, by Catherine A. Kerwin, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

The rope furnished by defendant for ordinary use upon its wagons for the purpose of securing the loads of said wagons was a part of the “plant” within the meaning of the statute. *(Lipstein*v. *Provident Loan*Society, 154 App. Div. 732.) The action was, therefore, maintainable under the provisions of the Labor Law as amended in 1910.* The questions of assumption of risk or contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff were primarily for the jury. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

*

 See Labor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 31; Laws of 1909, chap. 36), art. 14, as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 353.— [Rep.