alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.08

 360.10

 360.19

 360.19

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.74

 361.18

 360.20

 361.20

 361.20

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.56

 361.53

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 543

 544

 550

 550

 592

 592

 592

 589

 620

 551

 621

 621

 620

 620

 620

 620

 620

 620

 646

 644

STORAGE

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

+1

+6

+0

+42

+0

+0

-3

+31

-69

+70

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+26

-2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 6

 7

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 336

 332

 337

 328

 326

 330

 333

 300

 327

 336

 339

 444

 550

 1,307

 1,508

 1,513

 1,499

 2,043

 2,512

 2,531

 2,530

 2,512

 2,504

 2,506

 2,513

 2,501

 2,506

 3,028

 3,546

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2000

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +102 0 41,677 35

ACRE-FEET +102 0 82,666 69

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 5,562

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 69

 88,297

 543

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 305

 320

 318

 301

 300

 300

 299

 596

 296

 297

 286

 372

 448

 1,081

 1,578

 1,692

 1,699

 1,297

 2,796

 2,823

 2,827

 2,807

 2,762

 2,593

 2,488

 2,472

 2,474

 2,983

 3,467

 42,277

 83,856

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 82,666

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 5

 5

 6

 155

 279

 282

 303

 317

 318

 318

 320

 321

 125

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2,804

 5,562

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
Swanson, Brian (OST) ^^ga^c^-^cpoo -(^^"^^ 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Kalaupapatim @ aol.com 

Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:09 PM 

EAS (OST) 

answer to Pacific Wings' petition for reconsideration 

:^t OPtRATiONS 

!•• 2^ 1 

FYI 

From: Kalaupapatim@aol.com 

To: dennis.devanv@ dot.aov 

Sent: 1/12/2012 2:00:55 P.M. Hawaiian Standard Time 

Subj: (no subject) 

Dear Mr. De Vany, 

I am a resident of Kalaupapa Hawaii and I would like to give you my thoughts on Pacific 

Wings' petition to get the EAS contract back. I have lived in Kalaupapa and have 

delt with Pacific Wings for 6 years. Most of those years were fine and the rates were 

reasonable. After Pacific Wings and the State DOT had an "issue" everything changed. 

Rates for flights in an out of Kalaupapa were comparable to all the other airports in 

Hawaii and were, at times as low as $29.00 each way to Honolulu. After the alleged 

"confrontation" between DOT inspectors and Pacific Wings employees, the rates started 

to go up. Greg Kahlstorf (forgive me if his name is misspelled) denies that there is any 

connection between the two. I happen to have been the acting Administrator for 

Kalaupapa at that time and was included in many E-mails between Greg and Marvin 

Muniz of the HDOT and I do believe they were related. Mr. Walden seems to 

misrepresent quite a few facts in his letter to Susan Kurland regarding why Kalaupapa 

Residents should pay $250.00 R/T to topside Molokai and $510.00 R/T to Honolulu 

when he was able to only charge $29.00 each way fares from Molokai to 

Honolulu. Kalaupapa Airport and Molokai Airport are only 8 miles apart. Mr Walden 

states that the fares are that high due to the "staggering expense" with dealing with 

routine mechanical issues like a flat tire. In the 6 years that I have lived here, I only know 

of one instance where there was any issue with a commercial plane and it was a flat tire 

due to the Pacific Wings pilot landing so hard that he blew the tire out and nearly 

crashed the plane. Pacific Wings would not allow us to move the plane away from the 

runway so our airport was shut down for 3 days until they could find the cheapest way to 

get the parts to fix the wheel down to Kalaupapa. Mr. Walden also states that on March 

26th 2011, Hawaiian Air advertised one way air fares from Maui to Molokai at $294, 

$320 and $330. Since Hawaiian has not flown to Molokai for 10 years it shows another 

misrepresentation of the facts. Pacific Wings has not be truthful in their dealings and 

has gauged us on fares for the last few years and if the get the EAS contract back they 

will continue to do so. I hope that you will see and learn all the facts and will keep 

Makani Kai as our EAS carrier. They have been very helpful and have true Aloha spirit. 

Thank You for your time, 

Tim Richmond
### Part G—Allen J. Ellender Fellowship Program
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 383.98

 383.69

 383.41

 383.16

 382.87

 382.59

 382.39

 382.12

 381.89

 381.72

 381.59

 381.31

 380.98

 380.86

 380.49

 380.18

 379.85

 379.57

 379.12

 378.67

 378.26

 377.89

 377.49

 377.19

 376.85

 376.66

 376.36

 376.05

 375.68

 375.26

 282.3

 280.8

 279.2

 277.9

 276.3

 274.8

 273.7

 272.3

 271.0

 270.1

 269.5

 268.0

 266.2

 265.6

 263.7

 262.0

 260.3

 258.9

 256.6

 254.3

 252.2

 250.3

 248.3

 246.8

 245.1

 244.2

 242.7

 241.2

 239.4

 237.3

STORAGE

-1.8

-1.6

-1.5

-1.4

-1.6

-1.5

-1.1

-1.5

-1.2

-0.9

-0.7

-1.5

-1.7

-0.6

-1.9

-1.6

-1.7

-1.4

-2.3

-2.3

-2.1

-1.9

-2.0

-1.5

-1.7

-0.9

-1.5

-1.5

-1.8

-2.0

CHANGE

374

773

680

687

607

692

884

815

853

790

851

756

629

807

588

508

621

620

387

342

380

295

357

695

554

929

377

384

469

512

INFLOW

 1,150

 1,409

 1,279

 1,218

 1,229

 1,294

 1,261

 1,382

 964

 659

 729

 1,101

 1,178

 794

 1,226

 924

 949

 832

 1,022

 970

 893

 702

 829

 912

 872

 873

 721

 820

 1,151

 1,405

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 358

 436

 326

 266

 190

 197

 197

 265

 398

 382

 398

 397

 397

 396

 395

 392

 393

 393

 268

 201

 94

 0

OUTLET

 128

 147

 153

 137

 142

 143

 150

 143

 138

 138

 126

 130

 129

 123

 124

 129

 132

 126

 130

 126

 126

 129

 128

 132

 137

 130

 121

 121

 122

 126

PUMPING

 13

 13

 16

 18

 27

 14

 14

 21

 12

 12

 17

 7

 14

 9

 17

 7

 7

 8

 7

 7

 15

 12

 15

 16

 5

 5

 13

 13

 10

 9

C.F.S.

 .07

 .07

 .09

 .10

 .15

 .08

 .08

 .12

 .07

 .07

 .10

 .04

 .08

 .05

 .10

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .10

 .03

 .03

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 13, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -46.7 18,216 30,748 0 6,739 3,966 373 2.17 .41

ACRE-FEET -46,700 36,131 60,989 0 13,367 7,867 740

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 60,989

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 7,867

TOTAL 82,223

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = 1.90

 284.2

OUTLET 13,367 .41

Table 11
#### § 19.420 Withdrawals of spirits without payment of tax for experimental or research use.

A scientific university, college of learning, or institution of scientific research qualified under § 19.35 may withdraw spirits from bonded premises without payment of tax for experimental or research use. In order to withdraw a specific quantity of spirits for experimental or research use, the qualified institution must file a letterhead application with, and receive written approval from, the appropriate TTB officer.

(26 U.S.C. 5312)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.50

 1,901.53

 1,900.77

 1,901.28

 1,901.52

 1,900.91

 1,900.67

 1,900.81

 1,900.79

 1,900.98

 1,900.94

 1,901.24

 1,901.34

 1,901.00

 1,900.82

 1,900.87

 1,901.10

 1,901.21

 1,901.49

 1,901.29

 1,901.12

 1,901.14

 1,901.00

 1,900.95

 1,900.92

 1,900.98

 1,900.99

 1,901.02

 1,900.94

 1,900.71

 1,900.92

 14,285

 14,307

 13,742

 14,120

 14,300

 13,845

 13,668

 13,771

 13,756

 13,896

 13,867

 14,091

 14,165

 13,911

 13,779

 13,815

 13,986

 14,068

 14,278

 14,128

 14,001

 14,016

 13,911

 13,874

 13,852

 13,896

 13,904

 13,926

 13,867

 13,698

 13,852

STORAGE

+172

+22

-565

+378

+180

-455

-177

+103

-15

+140

-29

+224

+74

-254

-132

+36

+171

+82

+210

-150

-127

+15

-105

-37

-22

+44

+8

+22

-59

-169

+154

CHANGE

3,578

3,644

2,930

3,562

3,327

2,764

2,630

2,725

2,608

2,694

2,591

2,653

2,581

2,373

2,427

2,444

2,060

2,150

2,195

2,232

2,326

2,298

2,337

2,331

2,305

2,379

2,379

2,350

2,298

2,203

2,290

INFLOW

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 37

 46

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

POWER

 1,392

 1,327

 1,267

 1,226

 1,170

 1,128

 1,089

 1,046

 1,058

 1,005

 990

 930

 933

 893

 877

 816

 812

 822

 799

 783

 778

 778

 775

 729

 697

 716

 719

 720

 712

 665

 662

SPILL

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 158

 137

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

OUTLETS

 2

 6

 0

 3

 7

 5

 5

 4

 7

 7

 5

 0

 4

 0

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 8

 3

 8

 4

 4

 5

 6

 6

 7

 4

C.F.S.

 .07

 .27

 .02

 .12

 .34

 .22

 .22

 .18

 .32

 .33

 .25

 .00

 .17

 .01

 .08

 .12

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .14

 .14

 .37

 .13

 .37

 .20

 .20

 .25

 .29

 .26

 .31

 .17

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -261 79,664 2,983 2,360 28,314 127 5.81

ACRE-FEET -261 158,014 5,917 4,681 56,161 252

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 5,917

TOTAL RIVER 66,759 158,024

 14,113

 91,265

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,902

 2,105

 1,753

 1,947

 1,864

 1,665

 1,430

 1,440

 1,386

 1,446

 1,446

 1,445

 1,442

 1,443

 1,450

 1,442

 995

 1,120

 1,123

 1,357

 1,444

 1,339

 1,447

 1,448

 1,450

 1,472

 1,486

 1,448

 1,445

 1,451

 1,381

 46,012

 91,265
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID A. SALASKY,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 482, 2022

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1109012491 (N)

§ 

§ 

§ 

Submitted: July 12, 2023

Decided: September 26, 2023

Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to 

affirm, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Cour that:

(1) In September 2013, the appellant, David Salasky, pleaded guilty but 

mentally ill to two counts of first-degree murder, four counts of possession of a 

deadly weapon during the commission of a felony, and related offenses. In January 

2014, the Superior Court sentenced Salasky to two life sentences plus a term of 

years.

(2) In October 2017, Salasky filed a motion for postconviction relief under 

Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 seeking to set aside his guilty plea. The Superior 

Court denied the motion in February 2018. Although the motion was untimely, the 
2

Superior Court nevertheless considered its merits and found, among other things, 

that Salasky’s plea was made knowingly and voluntarily. Salasky did not appeal.

Between March 2019 and April 2022, Salasky filed four more motions seeking to 

set aside his guilty plea, all of which were denied.

(3) On November 28, 2022, Salasky filed another motion to set aside his 

guilty plea. The Superior Court denied it, and this appeal followed. A motion to set 

aside a guilty plea after the Superior Court has imposed a sentence must be made 

under Rule 61.1 The motion “constitutes a collateral attack against the conviction[s] 

and is subject to the requirements of Rule 61, including its bars of procedural 

default.”2 The Superior Court therefore properly denied Salasky’s motion, which 

was procedurally barred.3

1 Del. Super. Crim. R. 32(d).

2 Blackwell v. State, 736 A.2d 971, 972–73 (Del. 1999).

3 Del. Super. Crim. R. 61(d)(2) (providing that a second or subsequent motion for postconviction 

relief must be summarily dismissed unless the movant was convicted after a trial and pleads with 

particularity (i) new evidence of actual innocence or (ii) that a new rule of constitutional law, made 

retroactive to cases on collateral review, applies to the movant’s case and renders the conviction 

invalid). After the State filed its motion to affirm, Salasky filed a “motion for order to supplement 

the record on appeal,” in which he asks the Court to direct his trial counsel to turn over to him 

medical records that he believes remain in counsel’s possession and are relevant to his arguments 

on appeal. Because Salasky’s motion to set aside his guilty plea was procedurally barred, these 

records cannot advance his cause, and the motion is DENIED.
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

Notice is hereby given that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is deleting a system of records entitled “PROS/KEYS User Permissions Database-VA” (67VA30), which was first published FR Vol. 52, No 155 dated August 12, 1987. The system of records known as “PROS/KEYS User Permissions Database-VA” is obsolete. The information was initially developed as a means to grant individuals access permissions to the resources of the Austin Data Processing Center. The requirement for VA to maintain this system of records no longer exists because the PROS/KEYS Database was replaced by 87VA045, “Automated Customer Registration System (ACRS)-VA”, which was published in FR Vol. 60, No 239 dated December 13, 1995. 87VA045 was subsequently amended, renamed, renumbered and republished in its entirety as 87VA0050P, “Customer User Provisioning System (CUPS)-VA”, in FR Vol. 74, No 156 dated August 14, 2009.

                    A “Report of Intention to Publish a Federal Register Notice of Deletion of a System of Records” and an advance copy of the system notice have been provided to the appropriate congressional committees and to the Director, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as required by 5 U.S.C.                           ( print page 19525)                        552a(r) and guidelines issued by OMB (65 CFR 77677), dated December 12, 2000. This system deletion is effective April 7, 2011.                

Approved: March 18, 2011.

John R. Gingrich,

Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2011-8280 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.49 Duration of permits.

Permits to withdraw and deal in or use specially denatured spirits are continuing unless automatically terminated by the terms thereof, suspended or revoked as provided in § 20.51, or voluntarily surrendered. The provisions of § 20.57 are considered part of the terms and conditions of all permits.
#### § 361.745 What factors does the State Workforce Development Board use to develop the formula described in Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, which is used by the Governor to determine the appropriate one-stop infrastructure budget for each local area operating under the State infrastructure funding mechanism, if no reasonably implementable locally negotiated budget exists?

The State WDB must develop a formula, as described in WIOA sec. 121(h)(3)(B), to be used by the Governor under § 361.735(b)(3) in determining the appropriate budget for the infrastructure costs of one-stop centers in the local areas that do not reach agreement under the local funding mechanism and are, therefore, subject to the State funding mechanism. The formula identifies the factors and corresponding weights for each factor that the Governor must use, which must include: The number of one-stop centers in a local area; the population served by such centers; the services provided by such centers; and any factors relating to the operations of such centers in the local area that the State WDB determines are appropriate. As indicated in § 361.735(b)(1), if the local area has agreed on such a budget, the Governor may accept that budget in lieu of applying the formula factors.
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.127 Application of surety for relief from bond.

A surety on any bond given under the provisions of this subpart may at any time in writing notify the bonded manufacturer and the appropriate TTB officer that he desires, after a date named, to be relieved of liability under said bond. Such date shall be not less than 10 days after the date the notice is received by the appropriate TTB officer. The surety shall also file with the appropriate TTB officer an acknowledgement or other proof of service on the bonded manufacturer. If such notice is not thereafter in writing withdrawn, the rights of the bonded manufacturer as supported by said bond shall be terminated on the date named in the notice, and the surety shall be relieved from liability to the extent set forth in § 41.128.

[26 FR 8196, Aug. 31, 1961. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-251, 52 FR 19341, May 22, 1987. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 1,000 714 822

2 1,019 724 820

3 1,188 743 877

4 1,197 782 923

5 1,189 828 949

6 1,195 812 957

7 1,171 798 948

8 1,146 801 935

9 1,168 805 942

10 1,134 820 931

11 1,000 833 899

12 956 797 865

13 958 791 852

14 952 796 849

15 955 801 849

16 995 802 857

17 982 795 855

18 948 798 843

19 908 785 813

20 895 770 801

21 877 756 786

22 859 738 770

23 841 730 759

24 819 717 744

25 810 703 731

26 806 702 728

27 826 674 719

28 775 681 709

29 757 673 698

30 762 662 686

31 801 649 691

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Period: December 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 140

 138

 136

 134

 131

 129

 127

 124

 123

 122

 118

 112

 114

 111

 114

 119

 121

 122

 99

 102

 103

 103

 102

 104

 106

 108

 111

 114

 115

 116

 131

 132

 129

 123

 120

 119

 116

 115

 114

 111

 108

 108

 105

 106

 108

 113

 116

 92

 93

 96

 95

 95

 98

 100

 102

 102

 106

 107

 106

 103

 134

 135

 132

 128

 125

 123

 120

 119

 119

 115

 112

 110

 107

 108

 111

 116

 119

 109

 96

 99

 101

 100

 100

 102

 104

 105

 107

 110

 110

 109

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,953

 1,952

 1,949

 1,944

 1,937

 1,926

 1,910

 1,885

 1,861

 1,831

 1,793

 1,755

 1,718

 1,687

 1,664

 1,645

 1,632

 1,613

 1,584

 1,560

 1,541

 1,522

 1,503

 1,490

 1,482

 1,477

 1,477

 1,479

 1,478

 1,471

 140

 139

 139

 139

 138

 138

 136

 135

 133

 131

 128

 125

 123

 121

 119

 118

 117

 115

 113

 111

 110

 109

 107

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 105

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER