Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices 2921 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before 

February 3, 2011 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

review nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the review by 

February 3, 2011. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its review, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II(C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 11, 2011. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–837 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–691] 

In the Matter of Certain Inkjet Ink 

Supplies and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Commission Issuance of a 

General Exclusion Order and a Cease 

and Desist Order; Termination of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has issued a general 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order in the above-captioned 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), and has 

terminated the investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James A. Worth, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3065. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 29, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard 

Company of Palo Alto, California (‘‘HP’’). 

74 FR 55856–7 (Oct. 29, 2009). The 

complaint alleged violations of section 

337 in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, or the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain inkjet ink 

supplies or components thereof that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–7 and 

22–28 of United States Patent No. 

6,959,985; claims 1–10, 11, 12, 14, 18– 

20, 22, 26, 27, and 28–35 of United 

States Patent No. 7,104,630; claims 6, 7, 

9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,089,687 

(‘‘the ’687 patent’’); and claims 1–3, 5, 

and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,264,301 (‘‘the 

’301 patent’’). The complaint named as 

respondents Zhuhai Gree MagnetoElectric Co. Ltd. of Guangdong, China 

(‘‘Zhuhai’’); InkPlusToner.com of Canoga 

Park, California (‘‘InkPlusToner’’); Mipo 

International Ltd. of Kowloon, Hong 

Kong (‘‘Mipo International’’); Mextec 

Group, Inc. d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of 

Miami, Florida (‘‘Mextec’’); Shanghai 

Angel Printer Supplies Co. Ltd. of 

Shanghai, China (‘‘Shanghai Angel’’); 

SmartOne Services LLC d/b/a 

InkForSale.net of Hayward, California 

(‘‘Smart One’’); Shenzhen Print Media 

Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China 

(‘‘Shenzhen Print Media’’); Comptree Ink 

d/b/a Meritline, ABCInk, EZ Label, and 

CDR DVDR Media of City of Industry, 

California (‘‘Comptree’’); Zhuhai 

National Resources & Jingjie Imaging 

Products Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China 

(‘‘Zhuhai National’’); Tatrix International 

of Guangdong, China (‘‘Tatrix’’); and 

Ourway Image Co., of Guangdong, China 

(‘‘Ourway’’). 

Seven respondents, Mipo 

International, Mextec, Shanghai Angel, 

Shenzhen Print Media, Zhuhai National, 

Tatrix, and Ourway (collectively, 

‘‘Defaulting Respondents’’), failed to 

answer the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation. The ALJ granted default 

determinations against the Defaulting 

Respondents (Order No. 9), and the 

Commission determined not to review 

the order. See Notice of Commission 

Determination Not to Review an Initial 

Determination Finding Seven 

Respondents in Default (February 17, 

2010). Three respondents, Comptree, 

InkPlusToner, and SmartOne, reached 

settlement agreements with HP and 

were terminated from the investigation 

(Order Nos. 11, 13, and 14), and the 

Commission determined not to review 

those orders. One respondent, Zhuhai, 

was terminated from the investigation 

on the basis of a consent order (Order 

No. 12), and the Commission 

determined not to review that order. 

On May 7, 2010, HP moved for 

summary determination that a domestic 

industry exists and that the Defaulting 

Respondents have violated section 337. 

The ALJ granted HP’s motion and issued 

his final ID (Order No. 18) on August 30, 

2010, finding substantial, reliable and 

probative evidence of violation by the 

Defaulting Respondents with respect to 

claims 6 and 9 of the ‘687 patent and 

claims 1, 5, and 6 of the ‘301 patent. The 

ID included the ALJ’s recommended 

determination (‘‘RD’’) on remedy and 

bonding. The ALJ recommended that in 

the event the Commission finds a 

violation of section 337, the 

Commission should issue a general 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

2922 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices 

order directed to domestic respondent 

Mextec. The ALJ also recommended that 

the Commission set a bond of 100 

percent for products imported during 

the period of Presidential review. 

On October 7, 2010, the Commission 

issued notice of its determination not to 

review the final ID, and to solicit 

submissions on remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding. On October 28, 

2010, HP and the Commission 

investigative attorney filed submissions 

with respect thereto. After reviewing the 

relevant portions of the record, the 

Commission has determined to issue a 

general exclusion order with respect to 

claims 6 and 9 of the ‘687 patent and 

claims 1, 5, and 6 of the ‘301 patent, and 

a cease and desist order against Mextec 

with respect to the same claims. 

The Commission has therefore 

terminated this investigation. The 

authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and sections 

210.16(c), 210.41–.42, and 210.50 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.16(c), 210.41– 

.42, and 210.50). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 11, 2011. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–836 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

December 30, 2010, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. Gasco Energy 

Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:10–CV– 

01282–PMW, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Utah. 

In this action the United States seeks 

civil penalties and injunctive relief for 

alleged violations of the Clean Air Act 

(‘‘CAA’’), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., at Gasco 

Energy Inc.’s (‘‘Gasco’’) Riverbend 

compressor station in Uintah County, 

Utah. Specifically, the United States 

alleges that Gasco failed to control the 

emission of hazardous air pollutants 

(‘‘HAPs’’) as required by Section 112 of 

the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412, and 40 CFR 

part 63, subpart HH (applicable to 

certain glycol dehydrators at natural gas 

production facilities) and subpart ZZZZ 

(applicable to certain reciprocating 

internal combustion engines at natural 

gas production facilities). The proposed 

consent decree would require Gasco to 

pay a civil penalty of $350,000, comply 

with regulatory requirements, and make 

additional reductions in emissions 

through a requirement to retrofit or 

replace certain high bleed pneumatic 

controllers with ‘‘low bleed’’ 

components. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Gasco Energy Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 

90–5–2–1–09483. 

The consent decree and associated 

appendices may be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

consent decree and the associated 

appendices may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $16.75 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. All requests for documents 

should refer to United States v. Gasco 

Energy Inc., D.J. Ref. No., Civil Action 

Number 2:10–CV–01282–PMW, and D.J. 

Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–09483. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–824 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on January 

10, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Western Reman 

Industrial Inc., Civil Action No. 11–cv– 

00008 was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Northern 

District of Indiana. 

In this action, the United States 

alleges that the Defendant is liable 

under Sections 107 and 113(g)(2) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 

42 U.S.C. 9607 and 9613(g)(2), for the 

recovery of response costs incurred and 

to be incurred by the United States at 

the Building 190 at the former Grissom 

Air Force Base, located at 1175 North 

Hoosier Boulevard, Peru, Indiana (‘‘Site’’ 

or ‘‘Building 190 Site’’). Under the 

proposed Consent Decree, Defendant 

will reimburse the United States 

$300,000 in past and future response 

costs. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Western Reman Industrial Inc., 

D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–09273. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed Consent Decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$4.75 for a copy of the Consent Decree 

including all attachments (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–861 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES