alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.14

 1,901.01

 1,901.29

 1,901.16

 1,901.26

 1,901.32

 1,901.31

 1,901.13

 1,901.24

 1,901.20

 1,900.98

 1,900.98

 1,900.77

 1,900.72

 1,901.66

 1,901.37

 1,901.03

 1,900.98

 1,901.55

 1,901.44

 1,901.38

 1,901.52

 1,901.38

 1,901.32

 1,901.51

 1,901.50

 1,901.42

 1,901.22

 1,900.85

 1,901.07

 1,901.21

 14,016

 13,918

 14,128

 14,031

 14,105

 14,150

 14,143

 14,008

 14,091

 14,061

 13,896

 13,896

 13,742

 13,705

 14,405

 14,188

 13,933

 13,896

 14,322

 14,240

 14,195

 14,300

 14,195

 14,150

 14,292

 14,285

 14,225

 14,076

 13,801

 13,963

 14,068

STORAGE

-75

-98

+210

-97

+74

+45

-7

-135

+83

-30

-165

+0

-154

-37

+700

-217

-255

-37

+426

-82

-45

+105

-105

-45

+142

-7

-60

-149

-275

+162

+105

CHANGE

1,095

1,094

1,231

1,094

1,150

1,160

1,109

1,060

1,160

1,198

1,088

1,187

1,073

400

771

310

291

1,207

2,276

1,944

1,667

1,914

1,633

2,273

2,146

2,133

2,206

1,866

1,992

1,516

1,788

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 13

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 242

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

 255

SPILL

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

OUTLETS

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 0

 1

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

C.F.S.

 .05

 .09

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .11

 .09

 .10

 .14

 .00

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .03

 .10

 .05

 .04

 .11

 .10

 .05

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .14

 .16

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 21, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -23 43,032 573 1,395 7,332 57 2.62

ACRE-FEET -23 85,354 1,137 2,767 14,543 113

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 1,137

TOTAL RIVER 18,447 85,265

 14,091

 66,818

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 832

 841

 823

 841

 811

 835

 811

 826

 815

 913

 870

 885

 849

 118

 118

 118

 118

 924

 1,759

 1,684

 1,388

 1,560

 1,385

 1,994

 1,772

 1,836

 1,933

 1,638

 1,828

 1,131

 1,431

 33,687

 66,818

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.20

 1,901.52

 1,901.69

 1,901.38

 1,901.24

 1,901.58

 1,901.35

 1,901.14

 1,901.40

 1,901.19

 1,901.26

 1,901.10

 1,900.98

 1,901.21

 1,900.87

 1,901.20

 1,901.29

 1,901.39

 1,900.94

 1,900.86

 1,900.96

 1,901.10

 1,901.23

 1,901.44

 1,901.77

 1,901.07

 1,900.83

 1,900.94

 1,901.20

 1,901.06

 14,061

 14,300

 14,427

 14,195

 14,091

 14,345

 14,173

 14,016

 14,210

 14,053

 14,105

 13,986

 13,896

 14,068

 13,815

 14,061

 14,128

 14,203

 13,867

 13,808

 13,882

 13,986

 14,083

 14,240

 14,487

 13,963

 13,786

 13,867

 14,061

 13,956

STORAGE

-30

+239

+127

-232

-104

+254

-172

-157

+194

-157

+52

-119

-90

+172

-253

+246

+67

+75

-336

-59

+74

+104

+97

+157

+247

-524

-177

+81

+194

-105

CHANGE

2,585

2,222

2,177

2,050

1,859

2,147

2,015

1,827

1,909

1,682

1,792

1,744

2,150

1,666

1,436

1,725

1,781

1,527

1,464

2,475

2,526

2,480

2,095

2,489

3,113

2,787

2,669

2,472

2,694

2,560

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 21

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 33

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 1,271

 1,183

 1,146

 1,084

 1,014

 998

 954

 858

 853

 802

 740

 726

 702

 592

 572

 571

 569

 508

 508

 456

 450

 429

 372

 365

 324

 319

 320

 318

 318

 315

SPILL

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 109

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 130

 97

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

OUTLETS

 7

 7

 8

 6

 3

 6

 4

 5

 5

 5

 7

 6

 6

 7

 8

 7

 9

 7

 6

 8

 7

 7

 7

 9

 7

 6

 7

 7

 7

 6

C.F.S.

 .30

 .32

 .38

 .26

 .14

 .25

 .19

 .24

 .25

 .21

 .30

 .27

 .27

 .34

 .35

 .31

 .39

 .30

 .29

 .37

 .34

 .32

 .33

 .40

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .30

 .28

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 25, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -135 64,118 1,654 2,246 19,637 197 8.92

ACRE-FEET -135 127,178 3,281 4,455 38,950 391

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 3,281

TOTAL RIVER 46,686 126,921

 14,091

 80,235

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,192

 782

 829

 947

 764

 885

 1,014

 913

 823

 824

 889

 942

 1,357

 850

 854

 893

 1,039

 844

 989

 1,911

 1,902

 1,862

 1,537

 1,906

 2,527

 2,596

 2,301

 1,976

 2,141

 2,162

 40,451

 80,235

Table 6
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 33-8316 on Forms S-8 and S-3,Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-00883 onForm S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-48023 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-47835 onForm S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration StatementNo. 333-33147 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-11779 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 333-77595 and Registration StatementNos. 33-20226, 33-23699, 33-33571, 33-41330, 33-81914, 333-04041, 333-86875, 33-61549, 333-64234, and 333-83126 on Form S-8 of our report datedMarch 26, 2002 (April 17, 2002 as to the last sentence of Note 6) appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the year endedJanuary 31, 2002.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
# Drp T O r wjmmm m Ils aRenn a 4 7 Hillove r

Lan e Sa g Harbor , NY , 1196 3 Jun e 18* , 201 0 FAA , Docke

t Operation s M-3 0 U.S
. Departmen

t o f Transportation 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e SE Roo mW12-140 , West

Building Groun

dFloo r Washington , D

C 2059 0 000 1 Dear Sir/Madam : Reference : Docke t

#FA A 201 0 0302 , Helicopte r Noise/Ai r

Pollutio n Issue , Lon g Island , N Y Thanl t yoiTfor yoii r support tb~mitigateii5ttcopte r

traffi c nois e ove r

eastern Lon g Island
. However , the.Rlpposfijd
. FA A rule s a s state dd o no t adequatel y addres s th e issue s relate dt o th e town s o f Southampto n an dEas t

Hampton
. I understan dthat , unde r

propose dregulations , HHK i flying th e NORTHER N rout e ove r Lon g Islan dSoun d woul db e abl e vee r

of f t o reac h Eas t

Hampto n airport

an dpas s ove r

populate darea s i n Noya c an dNort h Sea
. Althoug h th e propose d2,50 0 fee t limitatio n i s aste p i n th e righ t direction , helicopter s d o no t attai n thi s altitud e fo r severa l mile s fromth e airport
. Thus , th e nois e an dai r pollutio n an dsafet

y issue s fo r

th e familie s livin g i n Noyac , Nort h Se aan dSa g Harbo r remai n seriousc g I n Noyac , Nort h Se aan darea s o f Sa g Harbor , w e ar e als o subjecte dt o constan t nois e an dai r

pollutio n resultin g fro mlarg e number s o f

persona l an dcorporat e jets , seaplane s an dvariou s othe r fixedwin g aircraf

t flying similar route s a s helicopters
. Helicopte r nois e an dai r

pollutio n i s bu t

on e are ao f

concern , th e othe r

ha s ve t t o eve n b e addressed ! W e kno w tha t fume s fromaircraf

t fiiel ar e very dangerou s pollutant s ye t neithe r ou r representative s no r th e FA A ha s take n positiv e step s t o shiel dth e populatio n o r natur e reserve s in th e are afromthi s pollution
. Helicopter s usin g th e NORTHER N rout e shoul db e REQUIRE D t o stay ove r wate r unti l Orien t

Point , the n trave l ove r Gardiner s Bay an dBarcelon aNec k directl y int o Eas t

Hampto n airport
. The y shoul dals o b e REQUIRE D t o follo w th e sam e rout e o n retur n trip s t o Ne w York
. Th e lan darea s near thi s over-the-wate r

rout e ~ Barcelon a Nec k i n Eas t Hampto n an dMashomac k Preserv e o n Shelte r

Island

—ar e essentiall y unpopulated
. Th e SOUTHER N rout e ove r th e ocea n woul db e th e bes t choice , a s i t

woul ddisturb onl y afew peopl e o n a fe w larg e estates—^th

e peopl e mos t

likel y t o us e Eas t

Hampto n airport
. I understan dtha t currentl y les s tha n 15 % o f helicopter s o r

othe r aircraf t aircraf t us e thi s ocea n route . Th e additiona l cos t t o operator s flying thi s rout e shoul dno t

b e considere dabov e th e safet y an dcomfor

t o f thousand s o f

familie s i n Noya c an dNort h Sea
. Kindl y conside r

thes e comment s a s par t

o f th e publi c commen t

o n th e propose dregulation s FA A 201 0 0302
. Than k you .

Ils aRenn a Cc : Congressma n Ti mBishop , Senato r Charle s Schume r
### §1068g. Continuation awards

The Secretary shall make continuation awards under this subchapter for the second and succeeding years of a grant only after determining that the recipient is making satisfactory progress in carrying out the grant.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title III, §398, as added Pub. L. 105–244, title III, §308(g), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1649.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 1001 of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION N o. 04

- 13

- 00002

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.J. , a C hild From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011

- PA

- 02163 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding Opi nion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice Delivered and Filed: May 29, 2013 AFFIRMED This is an accelerated appeal from an order in a suit brought by the Department of Family and Protective Services to terminate appellant ’s parental rights. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 263.405 (West Supp. 2012). In its final order, the trial court did not terminate appellant’s parental rights, but appointed the maternal grandparents permanent managing conservators of the child. Appellant and respondent

- mother were named possessory conservators. After appellant filed a notice of appeal, a ppellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a brief con taining a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concluded that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1 967). See In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.
C San Antonio 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure in04

- 13

- 00002

- CV

- 2

- appeal from order terminating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Cou nsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to appellant who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The order of the trial court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Karen Angelini, Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.5


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          FISHER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.


                                       1.

         The name of the Corporation is FISHER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.

                                       2.

         The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended by
deleting Article I thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in
lieu of Article I:

                                       "I.

                   The name of the Corporation is HALIS, Inc."

                                       3.

         The amendment set forth in Article 2 of these Articles of Amendment was
adopted on November 14, 1996.

                                       4.

         These Articles of Amendment were adopted by action of the Corporation's
Board of Directors. Shareholder approval of these Articles of Amendment was not
required.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of
Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Corporation, on
this 18th day of November, 1996.

                                    FISHER BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Larry Fisher
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                        Larry Fisher
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 296

 300

 295

 301

 302

 295

 293

 298

 292

 295

 290

 301

 314

 310

 306

 301

 297

 297

 296

 291

 303

 293

 292

 294

 294

 291

 309

 298

 292

 291

 291

 290

 284

 288

 284

 283

 283

 276

 276

 280

 280

 277

 276

 279

 279

 276

 267

 265

 263

 258

 257

 258

 256

 251

 253

 253

 256

 253

 250

 254

 293

 292

 292

 293

 291

 288

 286

 285

 284

 285

 284

 284

 289

 291

 289

 286

 281

 280

 279

 275

 277

 275

 274

 272

 272

 271

 276

 273

 269

 270

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
#### Elizabeth N. Berger et al., Respondents, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Defendant, and Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, Appellant.

*957Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1007.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.218 Disposition of Forms 1582-A (5120.24).

On removal of the wines from the premises, the exporter shall forward one copy of Form 1582-A (5120.24) to the appropriate TTB officer, retain one copy for his files, and deliver the original and remaining copy to the officer to whom the shipment is consigned, or in whose care it is shipped, as required by subpart M of this part. Where the shipment is for delivery for use on aircraft, the copy marked “Consignee's Copy”, provided for in § 28.214, shall be forwarded to the airline company at the airport.

(46 Stat. 690, as amended, 48 Stat. 999, as amended, 72 Stat. 1336; 19 U.S.C. 1309, 81c, 26 U.S.C. 5062)

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3833, Jan. 27, 2004]
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10812
LAREDO LASER & SURGERY LIMITED, Plaintiff - Appellant v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, a Division of Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Company, Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

3:10-CV-503
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Loc. R. 47.6. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5, the court has determ ined that this op inion s hould not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-10812 Document: 00512278518 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 492.08

 492.98

 495.12

 497.72

 502.19

 507.62

 513.77

 519.52

 526.03

 531.89

 536.44

 539.00

 540.99

 542.65

 544.43

 546.20

 547.23

 548.06

 549.01

 549.96

 551.29

 552.82

 554.45

 556.03

 557.75

 559.87

 562.24

 564.67

 566.88

 568.53

 193.1

 195.6

 201.6

 209.0

 222.1

 238.8

 258.5

 277.7

 300.5

 321.9

 339.1

 349.0

 356.8

 363.4

 370.6

 377.7

 382.0

 385.4

 389.3

 393.3

 398.8

 405.3

 412.3

 419.1

 426.6

 435.9

 446.5

 457.5

 467.6

 475.3

STORAGE

+0.9

+2.5

+6.0

+7.4

+13.1

+16.6

+19.7

+19.3

+22.8

+21.4

+17.2

+9.9

+7.8

+6.6

+7.1

+7.2

+4.2

+3.4

+3.9

+4.0

+5.6

+6.5

+7.0

+6.8

+7.5

+9.3

+10.6

+11.0

+10.1

+7.7

CHANGE

6,537

7,470

9,332

9,540

11,731

12,929

14,105

13,360

14,853

14,052

12,556

9,504

8,654

8,710

9,395

9,451

7,876

7,113

6,841

6,661

7,286

7,304

7,508

7,613

7,706

8,100

8,833

9,270

9,078

8,147

INFLOW

 1,048

 1,134

 1,179

 1,067

 963

 832

 849

 906

 895

 873

 941

 981

 1,011

 1,034

 1,128

 1,180

 1,164

 1,137

 1,114

 1,114

 906

 802

 908

 957

 978

 957

 958

 991

 1,006

 987

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4,209

 4,260

 4,303

 3,885

 3,304

 2,865

 2,461

 2,159

 2,065

 1,977

 2,548

 3,125

 3,295

 3,945

 4,261

 4,256

 4,197

 3,871

 3,360

 3,155

 3,154

 2,838

 2,680

 2,824

 2,549

 2,028

 2,132

 2,302

 2,531

 2,872

FRIANT-KERN

 33

 30

 35

 45

 36

 48

 55

 29

 59

 52

 45

 50

 59

 59

 55

 44

 37

 31

 31

 42

 64

 52

 62

 52

 50

 54

 63

 81

 75

 74

C.F.S.

 .37

 .33

 .38

 .48

 .37

 .47

 .52

 .26

 .51

 .43

 .36

 .40

 .46

 .46

 .42

 .33

 .28

 .23

 .23

 .31

 .47

 .38

 .45

 .37

 .35

 .38

 .43

 .55

 .50

 .49

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +283.1 281,515 30,000 93,411 0 1,502 11.97 .00

ACRE-FEET +283,053 558,385 59,505 185,281 0 2,979

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 185,281

 59,505 272,351

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2009 TO DATE = 17.46

 192.2

 27,565 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 791

 795

 798

 803

 805

 802

 813

 554

 348

 351

 351

 350

 351

 353

 352

 351

 351

 351

 352

 353

 354

 354

 351

 349

 351

 351

 352

 353

 355

 352

RIVER

 13,897

 27,565

RIVER
<PAGE>
                              UNITED BANCORP, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall M.
Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




-------------------------------------------------
Randall M. Greenwood,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2004
!

"#	
	

  $%&	



												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 
'%&											 	 												

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INCUR DEBT

THIS MATTER came to be heard on the Motion to Incur Debt filed by the Debtors; and

it

APPEARING TO THE COURT that the Debtors filed this case under Chapter 13 of the

U.S. Bankruptcy Code on January 22, 2018; and it

()* 	 ++
" 	 %% 	 % 	 
'%& 	 	 $$,	 -&	 	 +&&.	 %,

&%//0	
		$$&		,	%	%	
'%&		%	1%	-	2340  	$,1	%&%	%

5356 	 $& 	 1	 % 	 ' 	 &$ 	 7% 	 %% 	 81,	 %,.	 $.% 	 - 	 $$&9%,.

20: : 	-&	%	$1&	-			,%	%	;;4	/,	1&%0	<,&-	&.,	3 : =	

%

()*	++
"	%%	
'%&>	%	% 	 
1&	
'%	 1,	 '	=	%	

%&-&



	%%	%	
'%&>	%	%	
1&	
'%	'0		%			&'.	




?		!	@AB	C 

!	D	++0	+

	%	&.	%&%

0	A&/		334

*,$	@ ;	33545 

(,	@ ;	335454

,	EFGF$$

	


Case 18-30313-KRH Doc 46 Filed 03/19/20 Entered 03/19/20 18:08:56 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
0	A&/


%	HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

)%	%%	BF&1$%.	?1/

%&		
F%	HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

PRESENTED BY:

	 	 II	?		!							 	 												 	 												

?		!	@AB	C 

!	D	++0	+

	%	&.	%&%

0	A&/		334

*,$	@ ;	33545 

(,	@ ;	335454

,	EFGF$$

	




	


	&'.	&%-.	%%	%	&&		'	&	'.	,,	&.	$&%

	 	 II	?		!							 	 												 	 												

									?		!

3

Mar 18 2020 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

 Mar 19 2020

Case 18-30313-KRH Doc 46 Filed 03/19/20 Entered 03/19/20 18:08:56 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
	
	

?		!0	81&

!	D	++0	+

	%	&.	%&%

0	A&/		334

&,		B%0	$%&		*&1%

4	%		%&%

0	A	334

--	-	%	)%	%%	*&1%

J 	%	B&	%&%0	1%	; ;

0	A		334



Case 18-30313-KRH Doc 46 Filed 03/19/20 Entered 03/19/20 18:08:56 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3