alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.75 Wine for personal or family use. ( a ) *General.* Any adult may, without payment of tax, produce wine for personal or family use and not for sale.
( b ) *Quantity.* The aggregate amount of wine that may be produced exempt from tax with respect to any household may not exceed: ( 1 ) 200 gallons per calendar year for a household in which two or more adults reside, or
( 2 ) 100 gallons per calendar year if there is only one adult residing in the household.
( c ) *Definition of an adult.* For the purposes of this section, an adult is any individual who is 18 years of age or older. However, if the locality in which the household is located has established by law a greater minimum age at which wine may be sold to individuals, the term “adult” will mean an individual who has attained that age.
( d ) *Proprietors of bonded wine premises.* Any adult, defined in § 24.75(c), who operates a bonded wine premises as an individual owner or in partnership with others, may produce wine and remove it from the bonded wine premises free of tax for personal or family use, subject to the limitations in § 24.75(b).
( e ) *Limitation.* This exemption should not in any manner be construed as authorizing the production of wine in violation of applicable State or local law. Except as provided in § 24.75(d), this exemption does not otherwise apply to partnerships, corporations, or associations.
( f ) *Removal.* Wine produced under this section may be removed from the premises where made for personal or family use including use at organized affairs, exhibitions or competitions, such as home winemaker's contests, tastings or judgings, but may not under any circumstances be sold or offered for sale. The proprietor of a bonded wine premises shall pay the tax on any wine removed for personal or family use in excess of the limitations provided in this section and shall also enter all quantities removed for personal or family use on TTB F 5120.17, Report of Bonded Wine Premises Operations.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1331, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5042))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0216) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1991, as amended by T.D. ATF-338, 58 FR 19064, Apr. 12, 1993; T.D. ATF-344, 58 FR 40354, July 28, 1993]
Case 20-03129-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/24/20 Entered 09/29/20 11:30:35 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 20-03129-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/24/20 Entered 09/29/20 11:30:35 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 20-03129-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/24/20 Entered 09/29/20 11:30:35 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

J.A., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-582 

[November 3, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-CJ000014-XXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 289

 290

 292

 305

 310

 317

 326

 317

 318

 318

 306

 296

 271

 277

 277

 285

 286

 285

 285

 279

 276

 271

 267

 264

 264

 265

 265

 265

 262

 262

 259

 227

 223

 232

 229

 235

 236

 253

 253

 249

 246

 246

 228

 227

 229

 232

 233

 237

 240

 243

 245

 246

 245

 243

 237

 232

 234

 237

 233

 232

 232

 233

 257

 250

 255

 262

 265

 268

 281

 277

 278

 281

 275

 256

 249

 252

 253

 254

 257

 257

 260

 258

 257

 255

 252

 251

 250

 249

 249

 246

 246

 245

 244

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
§ 24.296 Taxpaid wine operations. ( a ) *General.* The proprietor may conduct taxpaid wine operations authorized by § 24.102 in an area designated as a taxpaid wine premises at a bonded wine premises or at a taxpaid wine bottling house. Taxpaid foreign wine may be received on the taxpaid wine premises for reconditioning and removal without retaxpayment or for destruction without credit of tax. Any taxpaid wine operations will be separate from all nontaxpaid wine operations and taxpaid wine will be clearly identified as provided in § 24.135. The appropriate TTB officer may require any additional segregation and identification of taxpaid wine operations as deemed necessary to protect the revenue.
( b ) *Treatment and blending.* Taxpaid wine may be treated with sulfur dioxide compounds, refrigeration or pasteurization and may also be preserved, filtered or clarified by the use of methods or materials which will not change the basic character of the wine. Water may not be added to taxpaid wine. The proprietor who desires to treat wine in any manner (other than by simple filtration or the use of sulfur compounds, refrigeration or pasteurization) shall first file with the appropriate TTB officer an application giving the details of the proposed treatment. The proprietor may not use the treatment prior to approval. The proprietor may incur civil or criminal liability for using an unauthorized treatment of untaxpaid wine. Wine of the same kind (class and type), national origin and tax class may only be mixed to facilitate handling at a taxpaid wine bottling house; otherwise, the blending of taxpaid wine on such premises is prohibited. Taxpaid wine of different national origins, but of the same kind and tax class, may only be blended on taxpaid wine premises. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1407 (26 U.S.C. 5352, 5661))
[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
EXHIBIT 31.1  SECTION 302 PRESIDENT CERTIFICATION  FORM OF CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE  I, Tim Misewicz, the President of Prestige Capital Corporation, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Prestige Capital Corporation (the registrant)  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) (omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986);  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: 8/9/2007 /s/ Tim Misewicz Tim Misewicz President and Director
Opinion issued September 10, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 20 - 00569 - CV

——————————— IN RE BRITTANY HAINESWORTH , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Brittany Hainesworth , 1 has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order striking a hearing, set by relator, to “Set Aside Modify, and/or for Additional Temporary Orders” in the underlying suit affecting the parent

- chi ld relationship

.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of M.J., II , a Minor Child , Cause No. 103459

- F , in the 4 61st District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable Patrick Bulanek presiding.2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is only available in limited circumstances. See Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 8 39

– 40 (Tex. 1992). To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator mu st show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that no adequate remedy by appeal exists

. See I n re Kansas City S. Indus., Inc. , 1 39 S.W.3d 669 , 670 (Tex. 2004). “An appeal is inadequate when it comes too late to correct the [trial] court’s error without the loss of substantial rights to the complaining party.” Id. Here, relator has failed to demonstrate that her “appellate remedy will cause the permanent loss o f substantial rights

. ” Id. Accordingly, w e deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8 (a), (d). All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Adams

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2, 2016

NO. 03-16-00263-CV

Stacey Hammer, Appellant

v.

University Federal Credit Union; Wayne Morgan a/k/a El Campo Real Estate, LP a/k/a

The Morgan Children, Inc. a/k/a Preferred Properties; Venessa Zapata Peters; and

Kerry L. Haliburton, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 11, 2015. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 739

 755

 733

 743

 742

 747

 767

 763

 756

 729

 725

 721

 716

 740

 737

 747

 750

 766

 711

 755

 759

 773

 783

 772

 763

 757

 747

 721

 707

 688

 689

 679

 633

 647

 665

 664

 651

 663

 650

 659

 648

 607

 630

 633

 635

 616

 622

 645

 636

 629

 647

 643

 657

 507

 656

 638

 664

 656

 641

 593

 613

 590

 700

 692

 676

 680

 684

 681

 693

 688

 684

 669

 656

 666

 658

 662

 667

 667

 674

 670

 661

 680

 684

 700

 615

 705

 697

 698

 690

 676

 654

 646

 629

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNothing Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 6, 2006
#### Sophie Hodge, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Hodge, Deceased, Respondent, v. Frederic E. Lyford, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of New York, Ontario & Western Railway Company, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
### §1226a–1. Payments; installments, advances or reimbursement, and adjustments

Payments pursuant to grants or contracts under any applicable program may be made in installments, and in advance or by way of reimbursement, with necessary adjustments on account of overpayments or underpayments, as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 90–247, title IV, §423, formerly §425, as added Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(a)(10), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 170; renumbered §435, Pub. L. 92–318, title III, §301(a)(1), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 326; renumbered §415, Pub. L. 95–561, title XII, §1231(a)(1), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2342; renumbered §423 and amended Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §§212(b)(1), 261(a), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3913, 3927.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1232d of this title prior to its renumbering by Pub. L. 95–561.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 423 of Pub. L. 90–247 was classified to section 1231b of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–382.

Another prior section 423 of Pub. L. 90–247 was renumbered section 439, and is classified to section 1232b of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–382, §261(a), substituted "Secretary" for "Commissioner".
### Part B—Native Hawaiian Education
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 585.67

 584.94

 585.96

 584.89

 585.87

 586.22

 585.17

 584.23

 584.83

 584.68

 585.28

 584.89

 584.98

 585.79

 585.64

 585.88

 584.67

 584.31

 584.57

 585.94

 584.92

 585.24

 585.42

 584.88

 584.89

 584.85

 585.12

 585.65

 584.41

 584.25

 585.00

 22,928

 22,470

 23,110

 22,439

 23,053

 23,275

 22,614

 22,032

 22,402

 22,310

 22,683

 22,439

 22,495

 23,003

 22,909

 23,060

 22,303

 22,081

 22,242

 23,097

 22,458

 22,658

 22,771

 22,433

 22,439

 22,414

 22,582

 22,915

 22,143

 22,044

 22,507

STORAGE

+189

-458

+640

-671

+614

+222

-661

-582

+370

-92

+373

-244

+56

+508

-94

+151

-757

-222

+161

+855

-639

+200

+113

-338

+6

-25

+168

+333

-772

-99

+463

CHANGE

11,623

11,339

11,280

10,705

11,323

11,145

10,822

10,740

11,076

10,489

10,694

10,380

10,548

10,818

10,200

10,121

9,873

9,982

10,342

10,437

9,980

9,742

9,521

9,218

9,245

9,110

9,444

9,499

9,100

9,403

8,864

INFLOW

 11,522

 11,564

 10,950

 11,036

 11,001

 11,025

 11,150

 11,026

 10,882

 10,529

 10,500

 10,496

 10,513

 10,555

 10,240

 10,038

 10,248

 10,087

 10,255

 10,000

 10,297

 9,635

 9,459

 9,383

 9,234

 9,117

 9,352

 9,324

 9,482

 9,446

 8,626

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 6

 6

 7

 7

 12

 8

 5

 7

 7

 6

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 6

 6

 5

 6

 5

 5

 8

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -232 317,063 316,972 0 0 206

ACRE-FEET -232 628,894 628,714 0 0 409

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 628,714

SPILL 0

 22,739

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,748

 1,745

 1,756

 1,812

 1,759

 1,740

 1,896

 1,647

 1,748

 1,744

 1,719

 1,727

 1,741

 1,748

 1,764

 1,740

 1,768

 1,822

 1,768

 1,738

 1,737

 1,756

 1,725

 1,819

 1,752

 1,732

 1,764

 1,760

 1,749

 1,785

 1,784

 54,493

 108,087

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 9,413

 9,233

 9,029

 8,172

 8,907

 8,963

 8,420

 8,684

 8,988

 8,100

 8,512

 8,267

 8,520

 8,689

 8,278

 8,262

 7,868

 7,915

 8,451

 8,444

 8,029

 7,639

 7,427

 7,042

 7,276

 7,608

 7,640

 7,570

 7,129

 7,337

 6,732

 252,544

 500,921
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

          - 29 CFR Part 4044

### CFR Correction

In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1927 to End, revised as of July 1, 2010, on page 1007, in the table in Appendix B, in the entry for July 1994, the fourth column is corrected to read “.0525”.

[FR Doc. 2011-8325 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### §1606. Seizure; appraisement

The appropriate customs officer shall determine the domestic value, at the time and place of appraisement, of any vessel, vehicle, aircraft, merchandise, or baggage seized under the customs laws.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §606, 46 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(dd), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §321, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2056; Pub. L. 98–573, title II, §213(a)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §606, 42 Stat. 985. That section was superseded by section 606 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Prior provisions for appraisement of property seized under the customs laws, or laws relating to the registering, enrolling or licensing of vessels, were contained in R.S. §3074, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §642, 42 Stat. 989.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–573 and Pub. L. 98–473 inserted reference to aircraft.

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted "appropriate customs officer shall" for "collector shall require the appraiser to".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective Oct. 15, 1984, see section 214(e) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1304 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.51 Processing material. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor may produce processing material or receive processing material produced elsewhere. Fermented processing material may not be used in the manufacture of concentrate. Processing material may be used if it contains no more alcohol than is reasonably unavoidable, and must be used when produced, or as soon thereafter as practicable.
( b ) *Record of processing material.* A proprietor shall maintain a record, by kind and quantity, of processing material used.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0098) [T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]