alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

September-10

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Colored background verified with DFG's report Official numbers are posted on DFG's web

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,249 4,111 10,360 12,394 8,155 20,5

2-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,271 4,103 10,374 12,438 8,138 20,5

3-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,549 4,114 10,662 12,989 8,160 21,1

4-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,757 4,108 10,866 13,403 8,149 21,5

5-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,850 4,103 10,952 13,586 8,138 21,7

6-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,554 4,104 10,657 12,999 8,140 21,1

7-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 5 0 0 6,454 4,104 10,558 12,801 8,141 20,9

8-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,506 4,105 10,612 12,905 8,143 21,0

9-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6,968 4,096 11,064 13,821 8,125 21,9

10-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7,081 4,131 11,212 14,046 8,193 22,2

11-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6,989 4,102 11,091 13,862 8,137 21,9

12-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7,316 4,115 11,432 14,512 8,163 22,6

13-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7,440 4,092 11,532 14,757 8,116 22,8

14-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,432 4,091 11,523 14,741 8,114 22,8

15-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 7,204 4,078 11,282 14,289 8,089 22,3

16-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,414 4,064 10,478 12,723 8,061 20,7

17-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 5,944 4,077 10,021 11,790 8,086 19,8

18-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,973 4,088 10,061 11,847 8,109 19,9

19-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 5,966 4,076 10,042 11,834 8,084 19,9

20-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,298 3,664 8,962 10,509 7,268 17,7

21-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,748 3,686 8,434 9,418 7,311 16,7

22-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 2 0 0 4,602 4,178 8,780 9,128 8,288 17,4

23-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5,550 4,066 9,615 11,008 8,064 19,0

24-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6,145 4,088 10,233 12,189 8,109 20,2

25-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 5,966 4,067 10,033 11,834 8,066 19,9

26-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5,985 4,135 10,120 11,872 8,202 20,0

27-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,890 4,102 8,992 9,699 8,137 17,8

28-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 6,431 4,138 10,569 12,755 8,208 20,9

29-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 4 24 28 3 0 0 6,732 4,137 10,869 13,353 8,205 21,5

30-Sep-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6,566 4,143 10,709 13,023 8,218 21,2

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 34 24 58 XXXX 0 0 189,829 122,267 312,096 376,525 242,517 619,0

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Tracy Combin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-14-1996
<CASH>                                         775,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  834,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (186,760)
<INVENTORY>                                    222,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,250,181
<PP&E>                                      10,082,150
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,185,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,750,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,324,581
<BONDS>                                      2,666,918
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,745,585
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,487,175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,750,411
<SALES>                                      4,623,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,740,012
<CGS>                                        1,256,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,008,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               631,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                54,456
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15(d)-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             Date June 29, 2011
    
    /s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6114

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; DR. BRIAN S. COPE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00068-LCB-JLW)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Anthony Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Anthony Barnett, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his complaint without 

prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 3, 2016. The notice of 

appeal was filed on January 8, 2018.*

 Because Barnett failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal 

and deny Bennett’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
#### § 31.122 Incorporation of business.

Where an individual or a firm engaged in business requiring registration under this part forms a corporation to take over and conduct the business, the corporation, as a separate legal entity, must register in its own name as a new business.

(26 U.S.C. 5124)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20335-20336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Strategic Environmental Research and Development 
Program, Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of 
the meeting on June 16, 2011 is to review continuing research and 
development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the 
public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file 
statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the 
manner permitted by the Board.

DATES: Thursday, June 16, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: SpringHill Suites by Marriott, Pamlico Room, 300 Hotel 
Drive, New Bern, NC 28562.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jonathan Bunger, SERDP Office, 901 
North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 
696-2126.


[[Page 20336]]


    Dated: April 7, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-8635 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### §1886. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(d), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section, Pub. L. 87–794, title II, §256, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 881, defined terms. See section 2481 of this title.
No. 20774

#### Vernon LaTorra, et al., *v.*Board of County Commissioners of Adams County.

(400 P.2d 196)

Decided March 22, 1965.

Robert A. Lehman, for plaintiffs in error.

*496Berger, Lubow & Rothstein, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiffs in error were defendants.

It was alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff had adopted a valid county zoning resolution; that the defendants violated the terms of this resolution in that they occupied a house trailer, and erected a building without a permit, contrary to the provisions of the zoning resolution.

The only issue tendered by the answer of the defendants was whether the resolution in question had been legally adopted pursuant to the provisions of C.R.S. 1963, 106-2-11. The trial court adjudged that the resolution had been legally adopted, and ordered that the defendants “abate said building and trailer * * * and remove same.”

The sole point argued by counsel as ground for reversal of the judgment is that the trial court erred in determining that the notice of public hearing, which was published in connection with the adoption of the resolution, was sufficient and amounted to a compliance with the above cited statute. The statute provides in pertinent part:

> “The county planning commission shall certify a copy of the plans for zoning all or any part of the unincorporated territory within the county, or any adopted part or amendment thereof, or addition thereto, to the board of county commissioners of the county. After receiving the certification of said zoning plans from the commission and before the adoption of any zoning resolutions, the board of county commissioners shall hold a public hearing thereon, the time and place of which at least *497thirty days’ notice shall be given by one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. Such notice shall state the place at which the text and maps so certified by the county planning commission may be examined. * * *”

We have examined the notice which was published in this case and find that it was largely in conformance with the exact language of the statute and hence amounted to a full compliance with it.

No other assignment of error was seriously contended for, either in oral argument or in the briefs.

The judgment accordingly is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice McWilliams concur.
### §5033. Custody prior to appearance before magistrate judge

Whenever a juvenile is taken into custody for an alleged act of juvenile delinquency, the arresting officer shall immediately advise such juvenile of his legal rights, in language comprehensive to a juvenile, and shall immediately notify the Attorney General and the juvenile's parents, guardian, or custodian of such custody. The arresting officer shall also notify the parents, guardian, or custodian of the rights of the juvenile and of the nature of the alleged offense.

The juvenile shall be taken before a magistrate judge forthwith. In no event shall the juvenile be detained for longer than a reasonable period of time before being brought before a magistrate judge.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 857; Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §503, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1135; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§922, 923 (June 16, 1938, ch. 486, §§2, 3, 52 Stat. 765).

This section consolidates said section 923, and the final sentence of said section 922, of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with such changes of phraseology as were necessary to effect the consolidation.

This revised section and section 5032 of this title were rewritten to make clear the legislative intent that a juvenile delinquency proceeding shall result in the adjudication of a status rather than the conviction of a crime.

The other provisions of said section 922 are incorporated in section 5032 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–415 amended section generally, substituting "Custody prior to appearance before magistrate", for "Jurisdiction; written consent; jury trial precluded" in section catchline, and substituting provisions relating to advice of rights by arresting officer, notification of Attorney General, parents, guardian or custodian, and appearance before magistrate, for provisions relating to jurisdiction of district courts, jury, consent by juvenile, and apprisal of rights by Judge of District Court.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in catchline and wherever appearing in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §503, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1135, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.88

 584.51

 583.11

 582.73

 581.81

 583.01

 583.56

 583.84

 582.69

 582.00

 583.73

 584.19

 583.80

 582.42

 582.55

 581.54

 582.06

 582.70

 582.84

 583.13

 583.26

 583.24

 582.95

 582.78

 582.98

 581.99

 581.98

 582.35

 582.19

 581.65

 582.65

 22,433

 22,205

 21,350

 21,122

 20,575

 21,289

 21,623

 21,793

 21,098

 20,686

 21,726

 22,007

 21,769

 20,937

 21,014

 20,416

 20,722

 21,104

 21,187

 21,362

 21,441

 21,429

 21,253

 21,152

 21,271

 20,680

 20,674

 20,895

 20,799

 20,481

 21,074

STORAGE

-149

-228

-855

-228

-547

+714

+334

+170

-695

-412

+1,040

+281

-238

-832

+77

-598

+306

+382

+83

+175

+79

-12

-176

-101

+119

-591

-6

+221

-96

-318

+593

CHANGE

3,189

3,177

2,880

3,201

3,031

3,672

3,449

3,346

2,946

3,100

3,814

3,392

3,170

2,864

3,327

2,960

3,393

3,430

3,281

3,328

3,278

3,236

3,170

3,208

3,323

2,961

3,299

3,405

3,227

3,131

3,587

INFLOW

 3,263

 3,292

 3,310

 3,314

 3,307

 3,312

 3,281

 3,260

 3,295

 3,307

 3,289

 3,250

 3,289

 3,283

 3,287

 3,260

 3,237

 3,234

 3,236

 3,238

 3,236

 3,240

 3,259

 3,258

 3,262

 3,258

 3,302

 3,294

 3,275

 3,290

 3,288

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 1

 0

 1

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,508 100,775 101,506 0 0 28

ACRE-FEET -1,508 199,887 201,337 0 0 56

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 201,337

SPILL 0

 22,582

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 213

 124

 228

 150

 119

 167

 124

 526

 696

 77

 112

 77

 109

 161

 77

 296

 153

 232

 276

 190

 204

 123

 193

 257

 190

 555

 77

 614

 160

 77

 350

 6,907

 13,700

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 2,723

 2,871

 2,477

 2,738

 2,648

 3,241

 3,083

 2,579

 2,043

 2,830

 3,470

 3,378

 3,250

 2,470

 2,929

 2,456

 3,012

 2,960

 2,803

 2,929

 2,836

 2,927

 2,804

 2,768

 2,893

 2,092

 2,980

 2,502

 2,744

 2,733

 2,934

 87,103

 172,769
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.311 Scope of subpart.

The provisions of this subpart shall apply only to liquor bottles having a capacity of 200 ml. or more except where expressly applied to liquor bottles of less than 200 ml. capacity.

[T.D. 6954, 33 FR 6818, May 4, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-34, 41 FR 46864, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-459, 66 FR 38550, July 25, 2001]
### §108. Repeal of repealing act

Whenever an Act is repealed, which repealed a former Act, such former Act shall not thereby be revived, unless it shall be expressly so provided.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 635.)
(No. 6820

#### Standard Oil Division of American Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*The Board of Regents of the Regency Universities System, Illinois State University, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 20, 1972.*

Standard Oil Division of American Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

Paul E. Mathias, Legal Counsel for The Board of Regents of the Regency Universities System, Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Elizabeth A. Ullrich, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER XII—SCHOOL FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 501.87

 502.03

 502.19

 502.79

 503.72

 504.71

 506.52

 505.97

 505.75

 505.30

 504.87

 504.57

 504.19

 503.49

 502.88

 502.24

 501.59

 501.13

 500.74

 500.29

 500.35

 500.28

 500.22

 500.13

 500.22

 500.46

 500.60

 500.63

 500.84

 500.97

 500.99

 221.2

 221.7

 222.1

 223.9

 226.8

 229.8

 235.3

 233.6

 233.0

 231.6

 230.3

 229.3

 228.2

 226.1

 224.2

 222.3

 220.4

 219.0

 217.8

 216.5

 216.7

 216.5

 216.3

 216.0

 216.3

 217.0

 217.4

 217.5

 218.1

 218.5

 218.6

STORAGE

+0.1

+0.5

+0.5

+1.8

+2.8

+3.0

+5.6

-1.7

-0.7

-1.4

-1.3

-0.9

-1.2

-2.1

-1.8

-1.9

-1.9

-1.4

-1.2

-1.3

+0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

+0.3

+0.7

+0.4

+0.1

+0.6

+0.4

+0.1

CHANGE

1,264

1,434

1,365

1,831

2,203

2,380

3,819

211

882

613

504

564

491

144

330

265

208

319

227

116

954

786

858

799

901

955

775

677

970

941

822

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,021

 993

 920

 723

 580

 656

 804

 872

 1,015

 1,108

 960

 829

 870

 1,025

 1,067

 1,039

 998

 817

 617

 598

 671

 698

 755

 738

 586

 414

 381

 460

 502

 590

 623

FRIANT-KERN

 22

 19

 21

 18

 25

 21

 22

 20

 30

 25

 32

 19

 28

 13

 15

 18

 13

 16

 16

 12

 18

 16

 16

 19

 5

 8

 9

 13

 9

 12

 23

C.F.S.

 .23

 .20

 .22

 .18

 .26

 .21

 .22

 .20

 .30

 .25

 .32

 .19

 .28

 .13

 .15

 .19

 .13

 .17

 .17

 .13

 .19

 .17

 .17

 .20

 .05

 .08

 .09

 .14

 .09

 .12

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2.6 28,608 0 23,930 0 553 5.67 .00

ACRE-FEET -2,560 56,744 0 47,465 0 1,097

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 47,465

 0 58,204

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 0.00

 221.1

 10,739 0.00

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 191

 182

 182

 182

 182

 183

 182

 179

 178

 178

 177

 177

 177

 177

 177

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 176

 160

 146

 146

 146

RIVER

 5,414

 10,739

RIVER

Table 15
### §107. Parchment or paper for printing enrolled bills or resolutions

Enrolled bills and resolutions of either House of Congress shall be printed on parchment or paper of suitable quality as shall be determined by the Joint Committee on Printing.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 635.)
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ David R. Bailin                  
|                     |  |     |  | David R. Bailin                      
|                     |  |     |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Raghav V. Nandagopal             
|                     |  |     |  | Raghav V. Nandagopal                 
|                     |  |     |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven L. Suss                   
|                     |  |     |  | Steven L. Suss                       
|                     |  |     |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28