alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-290-CR

GARY HARRINGTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

------------

On August 28, 2009, Appellant Gary Harrington filed a notice of appeal,

attempting to appeal the trial court’s alleged denial of his “Motion For Probation

Following Execution Of Sentence.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12,

§ 6 (Vernon 2006).

2 On October 19, 2009, we sent Harrington a letter

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 We requested that the trial court forward to us a copy of the order

Harrington claimed to be appealing. In response, the trial court informed us that

no such order existed because the trial court lost jurisdiction to grant shock

probation 180 days after the date of Harrington’s conviction date and that

Harrington did not seek a hearing on his motion for shock probation until after

the trial court’s jurisdiction had expired. Id. In any event, as set forth below,

no appeal lies from the denial or implied denial of a motion for shock probation.
notifying him of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal because

no Texas statute authorizes a direct appeal from the denial or the implied denial

of a motion for shock probation. We stated in the letter that unless Harrington

or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with this court, on or before

October 29, 2009, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the

appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We received no response.

“The right to appeal is conferred by the Legislature, and a party may

appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized.” Dodson v. State, 988

S.W.2d 833, 834 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). Article 42.12,

section 6 does not provide statutory authority for appealing an order denying

shock probation. See Houlihan v. State, 579 S.W.2d 213, 216 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1979); Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977);

Dodson, 988 S.W.2d at 834.

Because there is no statutory authority for appealing an order denying

shock probation, we lack jurisdiction over Harrington’s appeal. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 10, 2009

2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M.Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ James M. Spiezio    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James M. Spiezio        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| August 9,  2010    |   |

 

----
(No. 6657

#### Northern Illinois Gas Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Waterways, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 27, 1972.*

Northern Illinois Gas Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*27Perlin, C.J.
#### Ruth K. Schwartz, Appellant, v. Joseph A. Schwartz, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
exv4w1



 





Exhibit 4.1








	COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS




	ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE




	SHARES




	SEE REVERSE FOB CERTAIN DEFINITIONS




	CUSIP 20451Q 10 4




	This certifies that




	is the owner of.




	Shares




	OF CQMPASS DVERSIFIED HOLDINGS, A DEJWARE STATUTORY TRUST (THE “TRUST”) WITH SUCH RIGHT AND
PRIVILEGES AS ARE SET FORTH IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT OF THE TRUST APRIL 25,
        .2006 (“THE 1RUST AGREEMENT”) AS IT MAY 3E AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.




	COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS




	Subject to any transfer restrictions in the Trust Agreement or on this Certificate, this
certificate is transferable on this books of the Trust in person or by duly authorized attorney
upon surrender of this certificate if properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless
countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar of the Trust.




	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Trust has caused this Certificate to be signed by its Regular Trustee.




	Dated

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED




	THE BANK OF NEW YORK




	TRANSFER AGENT

AND REGISTRAR




	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE




	COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS





 









 












	SUCH HOLDER’S SHARES OF UNDIVIDED BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY OF THE TRUST. A STATEMENT OF
THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF THE TRUST’S SHARES WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE TRUST TO THE
HOLDER HEREOF” UPON REQUEST WITHOUT CHARGE.




	The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:




	TEN COM – as tenants in common




	TEN ENT ___as tenants by the entireties




	JT TEN- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common




	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-___Custodian___




	Under Uniform Gifts to Minors




	Act___




	(State)




	Additional Abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




	For value Received, ___hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE




	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE




	Shares




	of the Trust represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint




	to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Trust with full power of
substitution in the premises.




	Dated




	By:




	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENI ARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.




	Signature(s) Guaranteed.




	By:




	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED
SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15)
§ 24.185 Use of wood to treat natural wine. ( a ) *Treatment by contact.* Natural wine may be treated with any wood that is consistent with the food additive requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The wood may be in the form of barrels, staves, chips, particles, or storage tanks that were used for the addition of wine spirits if the tanks are used for the baking of wine. The wood may be toasted (that is, heated to low, medium, or high, temperature without undergoing combustion), or charred and the wood must not be otherwise treated. If wine is treated with charred wood, the wood may not remove color from the wine.
( b ) *Use of wood essences and extracts.* A proprietor may make or purchase for blending purposes wine that has been heavily treated with wood; however, wood preparations made with an alcohol solution stronger than 24 percent alcohol by volume are essences and must be used in accordance with § 24.85. Wood essences and extracts must be consistent with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act for that purpose and may be used only in “other wine” in accordance with § 24.218. This paragraph (b) applies to liquid extracts and essences and to the extracts and essences in powder form or dissolved in water after the solvent has been evaporated.
( c ) *Use of wooden storage tanks.* Wooden storage tanks used for the addition of spirits may be used for the baking of wine.
[T.D. TTB-185, 87 FR 51897, Aug. 24, 2022]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Newport International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Cery B. Perle, Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 18, 2005                      /s/  Cery B. Perle
                                        ------------------------------
                                                Cery B. Perle.
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Accounting Officer)
### §405b. Omitted

Section, act May 28, 1926, ch. 411, §2, 44 Stat. 669, provided that the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Board referred to in section 405a of this title, its subdivisions and its officers, and their appointment, including the designation of its presiding officers, and the immunities, tenure of office, powers, duties, rights, and privileges of the members of the Board, shall remain the same as provided by existing law.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1663

Lower Tribunal No. 2019-DR-012905-O

_____________________________

MERIEM LOFTI,

Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER HOFFMAN,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Diana M. Tennis, Judge.

May 10, 2024

WOZNIAK, J.

As to the final judgment of dissolution, we find no error and affirm.

1

 As to 

the final order on relocation, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

STARGEL and SMITH, JJ., concur.

1 This case was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeal to this 

Court on January 1, 2023.
2

Gary Israel, Orlando, for Appellant.

John N. Bogdanoff, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Yearly Report of Prestige Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel D. Drummond, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Daniel D. Drummond Daniel D. Drummond Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  April 21, 2008
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.7 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Protocol to the Treaty of June 11, 1976 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 2004 

 with 

Annex 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 FINLAND 

 Extradition 

Protocol to the treaty of June 11, 1976. 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 2004; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at Helsinki 

 April 29 and May 28, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010. 

With annex.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rose Kalcheim, Appellant, v. Warden of the City Prison, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
### subpart 5—definitions; authorizations of appropriations
#### Lawrence Brothers, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Rose Chiangone, Defendant.

Motion for an injunction and a stay of proceedings denied, with ten dollars costs, and temporary stay vacated. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Peter D. Ubaldi, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Homeland Security Network, Inc. a Nevada corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. /s/ Peter D. UbaldiPeter D. UbaldiChief Executive OfficerDate: April 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934







I, Cecil Bond Kyte, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Save the World Air, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: August 14, 2009
/s/ CECIL BOND KYTECecil Bond KyteChief Executive Officer
260

LIBERTY SREET

METUCHEN, NEW JERSEY

© 2014 CBRE, Inc. This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation 

about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. You 

and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. 

Steven I. Beyda

Senior Associate

+1 732 509 2812

steven.beyda@cbre.com

David Gheriani

Associate

+1 732 509 8942

david.gheriani@cbre.com

FOR MORE

INFORMATION

PLEASE CONTACT

260 Liberty Street is in the 

heart Central New Jersey. 

Offering easy access to 

I-287 and the New Jersey 

Turnpike. Located in a quiet 

industrial complex cul-desac with a storage yard 

available as well. A must 

see opportunity! 

:: Zoned LI 

:: Outside Storage Available 

:: Access to I-287 & NJT

:: +$1.584 PSF taxes :: ±40,000 SF Building

:: ±4,725 SF Office Area

:: ±2.68 Acres

:: 19’ Ceiling Height

:: 40’ x 30’ Column Spacing

:: Dry Sprinkler

:: Power: _____ Amps 

:: 3 Tailboard Doors

:: 1 Drive-in Door

:: 1 Van Height Door (10’ x 16’)

:: 20 Car Parking

BUILDING FEATURES

COMMENTS

FINANCIALS

FOR

LEASE
260 

LIBERTY STREET

METUCHEN, NEW JERSEY

FOR LEASE

© 2014 CBRE, Inc. This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation 

about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. You 

and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs. 

LOCATION MAP

SITE PLAN

Steven I. Beyda

Senior Associate

+1 732 509 2812

steven.beyda@cbre.com

David Gheriani

Associate

+1 732 509 8942

david.gheriani@cbre.com

FOR MORE

INFORMATION

PLEASE CONTACT
#### Lomas & Nettleton Company *v.*Edmond Cadoux et al.

*Melvin J. Silverman,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Stephen M. Seelig,*for the appellant (defendant Homestead Lumber, Inc.).

*Nicholas A. Cioffi,*for the appellant (defendant Northern Business Capital Corporation).

Argued February 2

decided February 2, 1971

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
### §§509 to 521. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§602–614, 42 Stat. 984–987, related to pleading, procedure and disposition of seized articles or proceeds therefrom.

Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to section 509, see section 1602 of this title; section 510, see section 1603 of this title; section 511, see section 1604 of this title; section 512, see section 1605 of this title; section 513, see section 1606 of this title; section 514, see section 1607 of this title; section 515, see section 1608 of this title; section 516, see section 1609 of this title; section 517, see section 1610 of this title; section 518, see section 1611 of this title; section 519, see section 1612 of this title; section 520, see section 1613 of this title; section 521, see section 1614 of this title.