alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 585.24

 583.85

 583.59

 582.69

 583.02

 583.91

 584.23

 583.05

 582.50

 581.96

 579.41

 579.78

 580.31

 580.44

 581.21

 582.57

 583.76

 584.43

 584.11

 583.26

 582.77

 582.27

 581.74

 581.47

 582.05

 582.55

 583.39

 582.59

 581.49

 581.12

 580.86

 22,658

 21,799

 21,641

 21,098

 21,295

 21,835

 22,032

 21,313

 20,985

 20,663

 19,192

 19,400

 19,703

 19,777

 20,223

 21,026

 21,744

 22,155

 21,958

 21,441

 21,146

 20,847

 20,534

 20,375

 20,716

 21,014

 21,520

 21,038

 20,387

 20,170

 20,019

STORAGE

+287

-859

-158

-543

+197

+540

+197

-719

-328

-322

-1,471

+208

+303

+74

+446

+803

+718

+411

-197

-517

-295

-299

-313

-159

+341

+298

+506

-482

-651

-217

-151

CHANGE

3,424

2,889

3,174

2,979

3,349

3,524

3,350

2,896

3,107

3,099

2,455

3,371

3,419

3,305

3,479

3,651

3,613

3,464

3,165

3,000

3,116

3,101

3,117

3,181

3,412

3,411

3,516

3,003

2,919

3,164

3,202

INFLOW

 3,194

 3,236

 3,168

 3,168

 3,165

 3,167

 3,163

 3,172

 3,186

 3,174

 3,111

 3,177

 3,179

 3,181

 3,169

 3,161

 3,165

 3,170

 3,175

 3,174

 3,177

 3,166

 3,179

 3,174

 3,153

 3,172

 3,173

 3,158

 3,160

 3,182

 3,190

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 3

 1

 1

 2

 1

 4

 2

 2

 0

 0

 1

 2

 4

 2

 3

 0

 2

 2

 2

 4

 3

 3

 2

 6

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 7, 2009

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,352 99,855 98,339 10 2,635 57

ACRE-FEET -2,352 198,062 195,055 20 5,227 113

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 195,055

SPILL 20

 22,371

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,445

 1,037

 1,549

 1,577

 2,351

 2,782

 2,660

 2,236

 2,437

 1,342

 637

 399

 431

 360

 466

 510

 368

 670

 732

 764

 742

 540

 579

 92

 967

 288

 276

 158

 145

 137

 109

 28,786

 57,097

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 916

 564

 860

 795

 519

 479

 498

 487

 565

 1,660

 1,818

 2,931

 2,929

 2,889

 2,932

 2,682

 2,987

 2,601

 2,404

 2,097

 2,236

 2,439

 2,431

 3,072

 2,379

 3,134

 3,195

 2,829

 2,788

 3,035

 3,094

 64,245

 127,430
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7924]



[[Page 18566]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, Special Emphasis Panel, Origins and Mechanisms of 
Categorization.
    Date: April 27, 2011.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6911, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#573f38273a3639393a173a363e3b79393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="325a5d425f535c5c5f725f535b5e1c5c5b5a1c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7924 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


          As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
     incorporation of our reports to the Stockholders of Wheelabrator
     Technologies Inc., incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and into
     the registrant's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8
     (registration nos. 33-31523, 33-13720, 33-47989, 33-48837, 33-62281 and 33-
     64431) and into the registrant's previously filed Registration Statement on
     Form S-4 (registration no. 33-36118) and into the registrant's previously
     filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (registration no. 33-59606).


                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



     New York, New York
     March 26, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 10.14

                        SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE

        L-W Income Properties, a California Limited Partnership (Lessor), IMPCO
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Lessee) and AirSensors, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Guarantor) agree as follows:

        1.      RECITALS

                1.1 LEASE

                Lessor and Lessee executed a Lease dated May 10, 1989, for
premises commonly known as 16804 Gridley Place, Cerritos, California. That
Lease was amended by a First Amendment to Lease dated April 19, 1993. The
original Lease dated May 10, 1989, and its First Amendment dated April 19,
1993 are collectively referred to as the "the Lease". Guarantor has
guaranteed Lessee's performance of its obligations under the Lease pursuant
to a Guaranty dated October 15, 1993 (the Guaranty).

<PAGE>

                1.2 PRESENT TRANSACTION

                The term of the Lease runs to May 31, 1999. The Lease gives
the Lessee options to extend the Lease for two additional 5-year periods.
Lessee has exercised its first option to extend the Lease for five years
commencing June 1, 1999. The parties wish by this agreement to agree upon the
fair market rent which will prevail during the extended term.

        2.      RENT

        Commencing June 1, 1999, the base rent shall be $41,100 per month,
payable on the first day of each month. The rent shall be adjusted on the
first day of the thirty-first month of the option term (December 1, 2001) in
accordance with the provisions of Exhibit "B" of the May 10, 1989 lease.

        3.      GUARANTY

        Guarantor agrees that its Guaranty shall continue in effect during
the extended term of the

                                       2
<PAGE>

Lease.

        4.    NO OTHER CHANGES

        No other changes or amendments are made to the Lease except as set
forth herein, and the Lease as herein amended shall continue in effect for
the extended term.

        5.    ENTIRE AGREEMENT

        This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and all prior and
contemporaneous agreements, representations, negotiations and understanding
of the parties hereto, oral or written, are hereby superseded and merged
herein. Each party to this Amendment expressly warrants and represents to the
other that it has not relied upon any representation, inducement, promise or
agreement, oral or otherwise, by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any
party, which is not embodied herein. No modification or

                                       3

<PAGE>

amendment of this Amendment shall be binding unless fully executed in
writing. This agreement may be executed in counterparts.

        IMPCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,       L-W INCOME PROPERTIES,
        A Delaware Corporation          A California Limited
                                        Partnership

        By:  /s/ Don L.Dominic          By:  /s/ Steven Laskey

        Its: General Council            Its: Partner

        Date: Date: March 9, 1999

                                       4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.52

 1,901.39

 1,901.42

 1,901.46

 1,901.10

 1,901.04

 1,901.25

 1,901.15

 1,901.38

 1,901.44

 1,901.39

 1,901.44

 1,901.01

 1,901.24

 1,901.17

 1,900.93

 1,901.16

 1,901.32

 1,901.22

 1,901.62

 1,901.47

 1,901.04

 1,901.17

 1,901.24

 1,901.09

 1,901.54

 1,901.61

 1,901.53

 1,901.08

 1,900.88

 14,300

 14,203

 14,225

 14,255

 13,986

 13,941

 14,098

 14,023

 14,195

 14,240

 14,203

 14,240

 13,918

 14,091

 14,038

 13,859

 14,031

 14,150

 14,076

 14,375

 14,263

 13,941

 14,038

 14,091

 13,978

 14,315

 14,367

 14,307

 13,971

 13,823

STORAGE

+15

-97

+22

+30

-269

-45

+157

-75

+172

+45

-37

+37

-322

+173

-53

-179

+172

+119

-74

+299

-112

-322

+97

+53

-113

+337

+52

-60

-336

-148

CHANGE

2,741

2,580

2,663

2,734

1,548

1,789

1,895

1,732

1,936

1,750

1,757

1,782

1,834

1,879

1,778

1,802

2,068

1,964

1,867

2,129

682

308

1,103

496

412

824

1,349

439

299

392

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 27

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

 33

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 120

 120

 120

 173

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 400

 400

 367

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

SPILL

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 250

 244

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

OUTLETS

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 5

 4

 5

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 5

 5

 2

 5

 4

 5

 6

 5

 6

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 3

C.F.S.

 .28

 .27

 .28

 .28

 .25

 .21

 .17

 .21

 .19

 .23

 .23

 .24

 .26

 .25

 .25

 .11

 .21

 .17

 .24

 .27

 .23

 .26

 .19

 .23

 .23

 .22

 .22

 .21

 .19

 .16

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 21, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -462 46,532 1,426 4,094 7,980 147 6.74

ACRE-FEET -462 92,296 2,828 8,120 15,828 292

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 2,828

TOTAL RIVER 26,776 92,462

 14,285

 65,686

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 2,277

 2,173

 2,196

 2,263

 1,229

 1,357

 1,362

 1,315

 1,395

 1,272

 1,321

 1,308

 1,540

 1,337

 1,350

 1,440

 1,526

 1,450

 1,449

 1,522

 283

 14

 600

 14

 14

 199

 868

 14

 14

 14

 33,116

 65,686

Table 6
(No. 7038

#### Missouri Rolling Mill Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 26, 1972.*

Missouri Rolling Mill Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Charlie H. DAVIS, Leyda E. Chew, both individually and on behalf of Lequindra Keion Davis (19) and Chalise Davis (20), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hon. George WINSLOW, Jr., Richard S. Graham, Barbara Fancher Jones, Attorney, Kathy A. Jimenez, Attorney, Erik K. Neitzke, Attorney, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-16599

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 20, 2006.

Charlie H. Davis, Apopka, FL, pro se.

Leyda E. Chew, Apopka, FL, pro se.

Yvette Acosta MacMillan, Office of the Attorney General-State of Florida, Tampa, FL, Laura E. Roth, Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court-Volusia County, Deland, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Erik K. Neitzke, Daytona Beach, FL, pro se.

Before BLACK, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Davis and Leyda Chew, proceeding pro se, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Davis and Chew alleged that the actions of which they complain were taken by the state-actor defendants in their individual capacities. Davis and Chew asserted a variety of contractual, constitutional, and civil rights statutory causes of action, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and asked for money damages, custody of Chew’s son, reinstatement of Davis’s driver’s license, annulment of Chew’s divorce agreement with Harry Sperl, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and unspecified injunctive relief. Davis and Chew made it clear in their arguments to the district court that they are challenging the judgments against them in state court.

The *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction to hear Davis and Chew’s claims. The *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine establishes that federal courts, other than the Supreme Court, do not have subject-matter jurisdiction over actions that effectively seek to appeal state court judgments. *Amos v. Glynn County Bd. of Tax Assessors,*347 F.3d 1249, 1265 n.11 (11th Cir. 2003); *D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 1315, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 415-16, 44 S.Ct. 149, 150, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). Davis and *808Chew allege nothing to indicate that they were in any way deprived of the opportunity to raise their issues in the state court proceedings. To the extent that Davis and Chew raise issues that extend beyond a dissatisfaction with the outcome of their state court cases, those issues were decided by the state courts or inextricably bound up in those decisions.

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 543.49

 544.31

 545.69

 546.89

 548.02

 549.53

 551.45

 553.50

 555.17

 556.36

 557.29

 557.89

 558.27

 558.78

 559.08

 558.98

 558.49

 557.50

 556.11

 554.86

 553.66

 552.26

 550.62

 548.90

 547.03

 545.01

 542.93

 541.26

 539.68

 538.23

 536.67

 366.8

 370.1

 375.7

 380.6

 385.2

 391.5

 399.5

 408.2

 415.4

 420.5

 424.6

 427.2

 428.8

 431.1

 432.4

 432.0

 429.8

 425.5

 419.4

 414.0

 408.9

 402.9

 396.0

 388.9

 381.1

 372.9

 364.5

 357.9

 351.7

 346.0

 340.0

STORAGE

+0.6

+3.3

+5.6

+4.9

+4.6

+6.3

+8.0

+8.7

+7.2

+5.1

+4.0

+2.6

+1.7

+2.2

+1.3

-0.4

-2.2

-4.3

-6.1

-5.4

-5.1

-5.9

-6.9

-7.2

-7.7

-8.2

-8.4

-6.6

-6.2

-5.7

-6.0

CHANGE

3,081

4,201

5,274

4,750

4,292

5,198

6,269

6,642

5,610

4,476

3,983

3,521

3,302

3,735

3,636

3,489

3,375

3,362

3,260

3,921

4,118

3,655

3,038

2,991

3,025

2,972

2,772

3,812

3,914

3,855

3,888

INFLOW

 64

 55

 54

 55

 55

 54

 56

 55

 55

 53

 56

 55

 67

 103

 186

 267

 314

 441

 562

 588

 601

 591

 570

 559

 573

 592

 592

 620

 649

 597

 554

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 2,314

 2,120

 2,031

 1,859

 1,534

 1,621

 1,755

 1,784

 1,521

 1,407

 1,462

 1,714

 1,970

 2,061

 2,107

 2,107

 2,314

 2,777

 2,924

 3,031

 3,093

 3,044

 2,940

 3,047

 3,329

 3,517

 3,391

 3,536

 3,605

 3,607

 3,870

FRIANT-KERN

 18

 14

 22

 17

 8

 12

 22

 12

 13

 8

 11

 17

 11

 27

 17

 24

 16

 20

 10

 24

 8

 12

 9

 16

 15

 13

 18

 22

 19

 14

 20

C.F.S.

 .14

 .11

 .17

 .13

 .06

 .09

 .16

 .09

 .09

 .06

 .08

 .12

 .08

 .19

 .12

 .17

 .11

 .14

 .07

 .17

 .06

 .09

 .07

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .14

 .17

 .15

 .11

 .16

INCHES

 .59

 .63

 .02

 .01

 .36

 .09

 .09

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -26.2 123,417 9,693 77,392 0 489 3.63 2.36

ACRE-FEET -26,180 244,798 19,226 153,507 0 970

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 153,507

 19,226 270,008

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE = 13.85

 366.2

 97,275 2.36

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 382

 350

 350

 350

 351

 350

 384

 413

 414

 413

 413

 413

 413

 413

 660

 1,314

 1,817

 2,313

 2,815

 2,998

 3,006

 3,007

 2,998

 2,987

 3,001

 3,001

 2,988

 2,977

 2,773

 2,493

 2,485

RIVER

 49,042

 97,275

RIVER

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 13.85
#### Allen G. Green *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

*John D. LaBelle,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant).

*Donald R. Holtman,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued November 3

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County on the ground that the appeal has become moot is granted.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Herman C. Pollack for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 557

 553

 554

 572

 546

 550

 554

 526

 497

 494

 507

 524

 525

 528

 512

 490

 477

 508

 510

 509

 474

 472

 462

 468

 484

 490

 527

 541

 498

 521

 446

 449

 448

 441

 435

 448

 446

 444

 438

 432

 424

 440

 436

 435

 427

 423

 421

 415

 428

 423

 421

 408

 415

 414

 410

 409

 424

 426

 440

 438

 479

 480

 478

 491

 477

 477

 474

 466

 459

 450

 453

 468

 464

 461

 458

 450

 445

 450

 449

 445

 437

 432

 430

 430

 431

 435

 454

 476

 465

 463

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
#### Christian F. Dilg, Appellant, v. Gustavus Emil Strauss, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         691,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,075,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,675,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,347,583
<PP&E>                                      24,382,076
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,464,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,596,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,368,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,889
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,189,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,596,205
<SALES>                                      1,326,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,442,526
<CGS>                                          803,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,428,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.15 Materials for the production of beer. ( a ) Beer must be brewed from malt or from substitutes for malt. Only rice, grain of any kind, bran, glucose, sugar, and molasses are substitutes for malt. In addition, you may also use the following materials as adjuncts in fermenting beer: honey, fruit, fruit juice, fruit concentrate, herbs, spices, and other food materials.
( b ) You may use flavors and other nonbeverage ingredients containing alcohol in producing beer. Flavors and other nonbeverage ingredients containing alcohol may contribute no more than 49% of the overall alcohol content of the finished beer. For example, a finished beer that contains 5.0% alcohol by volume must derive a minimum of 2.55% alcohol by volume from the fermentation of ingredients at the brewery and may derive not more than 2.45% alcohol by volume from the addition of flavors and other nonbeverage ingredients containing alcohol. In the case of beer with an alcohol content of more than 6% by volume, no more than 1.5% of the volume of the beer may consist of alcohol derived from added flavors and other nonbeverage ingredients containing alcohol.
[T.D. TTB-21, 70 FR 235, Jan. 3, 2005]