alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Part B—National Diffusion Network

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part B of title XIII of Pub. L. 89–10, comprising this part, was renumbered part L of title IX of Pub. L. 103–227, the Educational Research, Development, Dissemination, and Improvement Act of 1994, by Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1022(a), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1987, transferred to part H (§6054 et seq.) of subchapter IX of chapter 68 of this title, and subsequently repealed.
Rocky Babcock seeks relief from the following specific sections of Title 14 of the Code of

Federal Regulation: **61.23 Medical Certificates: Requirement and duration** 
**61.101(e)(4) and (5) Recreational pilot privileges and limitations** 
**61.113(a) Private**  **pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in Command**
**61.315(a) What are the privileges and limitations of my**  **sport pilot certificate? 91.7(a)**  **Civil aircraft airworthiness 91.119(c)**  **Minimum safe altitudes: General 91.121**  **Al timeter settings.**  **91.151(a)(1) Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions**  **91.405(a) Maintenance required.**  **91.407(a)(1) Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration.**  **91.409(a)(1) and (2) Inspections**  **91.417(a) and (b) Maintenance records.** 
Rocky Babcock submits this request in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331

- 334 pursuing abatement from any current applicable FARS operating before me. I do intend to use the UAS for compensation for areal photogrophy, videogrphay and survey ing provided for intended individuals or groups that wish to utilize my services.The Inspire 1 meets the classification requirements in the Reform Act in Section 332 pertaining

to civil unmaned aircraft in to national airspace. The Inspire 1 also meet s the definition of ‘small unmanned aircraft’ as defined in section 331.
### Part I—21st Century Community Learning Centers
Order entered July 31, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00877
- CR MICHAEL GLEN GARZA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 354th Ju dicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 31429 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief. A review of this appeal shows the notice of appeal was filed August 1, 201 8 . After a seven

- month delay, the reporter’s twenty

- nine volume record was filed o n April 16, 2019. Appellant’s brief was initially due May 18, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by postcard dated May 22, 2019 , and directed him to file his brief and a mot ion to extend time within ten days. That same day, appellant filed a motion for extension of time. We granted that motion, along with a second motion, making the brief due date July 24, 2019, ninety days after the reporter’s record was filed. In our Jun e 26th order granting appellant’s second extension of time, we cautioned him that the failure to file a brief by that date might result in the appeal being abatedfor a hearing under rule 38.8(b)(3). Appellant now requests an additional two months, noting in

his third motion for extension that additional time is required because the record is large

. We GRANT appellant’s third motion to the extent we ORDER ap pellant’s brief DUE on or before September 16, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by that date , the Court will abate the case for a hearing to determine the adequacy of representation.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Keli Aiken, Presiding Judge, 354th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s / LANA MYERS JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 581.73

 581.02

 582.03

 580.64

 578.26

 575.82

 575.39

 576.93

 579.69

 583.02

 584.93

 584.10

 584.04

 584.62

 585.46

 584.89

 583.51

 580.50

 582.15

 583.29

 585.01

 584.17

 585.32

 584.81

 584.50

 585.18

 585.56

 585.37

 585.51

 20,528

 20,112

 20,704

 19,893

 18,554

 17,240

 17,015

 17,830

 19,350

 21,295

 22,464

 21,952

 21,915

 22,273

 22,796

 22,439

 21,593

 19,812

 20,776

 21,459

 22,513

 21,995

 22,708

 22,390

 22,199

 22,620

 22,859

 22,739

 22,827

STORAGE

+170

-416

+592

-811

-1,339

-1,314

-225

+815

+1,520

+1,945

+1,169

-512

-37

+358

+523

-357

-846

-1,781

+964

+683

+1,054

-518

+713

-318

-191

+421

+239

-120

+88

CHANGE

3,063

2,763

3,268

2,560

2,298

2,333

2,885

3,405

3,780

4,050

3,660

2,794

3,035

3,236

3,319

2,877

2,629

2,152

3,540

3,400

3,589

2,792

3,429

2,933

3,024

3,335

3,239

3,060

3,165

INFLOW

 2,889

 2,888

 2,885

 2,884

 2,887

 2,909

 2,911

 2,907

 2,927

 2,982

 2,985

 2,966

 2,967

 2,970

 2,969

 2,970

 2,970

 2,965

 2,969

 2,970

 2,972

 2,967

 2,981

 3,007

 3,034

 3,036

 3,033

 3,034

 3,034

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 3

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 4

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2016

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,469 89,613 85,868 0 2,465 37

ACRE-FEET +2,469 177,747 170,319 0 4,889 73

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 170,319

SPILL 0

 20,358

FISH TRAP 4,889

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,708

 1,480

 1,147

 144

 16

 14

 14

 14

 19

 514

 731

 348

 14

 189

 369

 342

 285

 14

 189

 247

 191

 360

 485

 40

 14

 14

 389

 273

 14

 9,578

 18,998

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 1,110

 1,133

 2,192

 2,234

 2,166

 2,086

 2,413

 3,037

 3,452

 3,326

 2,713

 2,322

 2,756

 2,851

 2,723

 2,361

 2,110

 1,901

 3,150

 2,982

 3,242

 2,364

 2,668

 2,590

 2,725

 3,106

 2,704

 2,653

 3,002

 74,072

 146,922
### Part B—Science-Technology Centers
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 552 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 552

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2019

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 
unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only Eastvale, 
California.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

X-RITE, INCORPORATED

LIST OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES



| | 1. | X-Rite Global, Incorporated
| | -- | ---------------------------



| | 2. | X-Rite Holdings, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------



| | 3. | GretagMacbeth, LLC
| | -- | ------------------



| | 4. | X-Rite MA, Incorporated
| | -- | -----------------------



| | 5. | Monaco Acquisition Company
| | -- | --------------------------



| | 6. | OTP, Inc.
| | -- | ---------



| | 7. | Holovision Acquisition Company
| | -- | ------------------------------



| | 8. | XR Ventures LLC
| | -- | ---------------



| | 9. | Pantone, Inc.
| | -- | -------------



| | 10. | Pantone Germany, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------



| | 11. | Pantone India, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------



| | 12. | Pantone UK, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------



| | 13. | Pantone Asia, Inc.
| | --- | ------------------



| | 14. | Pantone Japan, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------



| | 15. | Amazys Holding AG
| | --- | -----------------



| | 16. | X-Rite Holding AG
| | --- | -----------------



| | 17. | Amazys Beteiligungen GmbH
| | --- | -------------------------



| | 18. | X-Rite Europe AG (f/k/a Gretag-Macbeth AG)
| | --- | ------------------------------------------



| | 19. | X-Rite International, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------



| | 20. | X-Rite Méditerranée SARL
| | --- | ------------------------



| | 21. | X-Rite Italy S.R.L.
| | --- | -------------------



| | 22. | GretagMacbeth (Italy) S.R.L.
| | --- | ----------------------------



| | 23. | Viptronic S.R.L.
| | --- | ----------------



| | 24. | X-Rite Iberica
| | --- | --------------



| | 25. | X-Rite GmbH
| | --- | -----------



| | 26. | Gretag-Macbeth GmbH
| | --- | -------------------



| | 27. | LOGO Betiligungsgesellchaft mbH
| | --- | -------------------------------



| | 28. | LOGO Kommunikations- und Drucktechnik GmbH & Co. KG
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------



| | 29. | Pantone GmbH
| | --- | ------------



| | 30. | X-Rite spol, s.r.o.
| | --- | -------------------



| | 31. | X-Rite Limited
| | --- | --------------



| | 32. | GretagMacbeth Limited
| | --- | ---------------------



---

| | 33. | X-Rite Asia Pacific Limited
| | --- | ---------------------------



| | 34. | X-Rite Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
| | --- | ---------------------------



| | 35. | X-Rite (Shanghai) Color Management Co., Ltd.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------



| | 36. | X-Rite, (Shanghai) International Trading Limited
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------



| | 37. | GretagMacbeth (Shanghai) Company Limited
| | --- | ----------------------------------------



| | 38. | X-Rite Kabushiki Kaisha
| | --- | -----------------------



| | 39. | Pantone KK
| | --- | ----------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.94

 359.94

 359.94

 359.92

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.81

 359.81

 359.81

 359.83

 359.81

 359.78

 359.72

 359.81

 359.81

 359.78

 533

 533

 533

 531

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 525

 525

 525

 524

 524

 524

 525

 524

 522

 517

 524

 524

 522

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

-2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+1

-1

-2

-5

+7

+0

-2

CHANGE

 387

 408

 435

 424

 401

 377

 376

 346

 326

 340

 356

 356

 324

 356

 367

 368

 376

 351

 321

 277

 303

 303

 303

 303

 303

 332

 332

 347

 345

 372

 391

 329

 328

 326

 317

 286

 279

 277

 276

 277

 279

 277

 276

 233

 228

 228

 228

 266

 214

 204

 202

 190

 179

 179

 176

 177

 178

 164

 151

 155

 154

 156

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2014

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -11 0 7,189 10,906

ACRE-FEET -11 0 14,259 21,632

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 46,511

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 21,632

 82,402

 533

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,713

 1,772

 1,807

 1,789

 1,681

 1,621

 1,626

 1,586

 1,561

 1,590

 1,559

 1,552

 1,494

 1,533

 1,576

 1,583

 1,601

 1,592

 1,568

 1,418

 1,314

 1,150

 1,117

 1,073

 1,068

 1,138

 1,275

 1,373

 1,389

 1,426

 1,428

 45,973

 91,187

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 14,259

 840

 886

 909

 908

 857

 832

 840

 837

 831

 829

 781

 780

 789

 811

 849

 872

 872

 870

 874

 778

 630

 519

 457

 432

 432

 453

 609

 750

 770

 783

 769

 23,449

 46,511

RIVER CANALS
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11366]

[[Page 27002]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Light 
Light Solutions, LLC of Athens, Georgia, an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent Application Serial No. 12/617,245, ``Fluorescence Spectroscopy 
for Rapid Detection and Classification of Bacterial Pathogens,'' filed 
on November 12, 2009.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 9, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Light Light Solutions, LLC of 
Athens, Georgia has submitted a complete and sufficient application for 
a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing 
and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 
CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, 
within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-11366 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 302

 284

 299

 277

 267

 245

 239

 235

 229

 223

 228

 226

 221

 224

 193

 184

 176

 180

 174

 183

 186

 184

 189

 197

 204

 195

 200

 199

 198

 236

 230

 229

 223

 215

 209

 207

 202

 201

 199

 196

 196

 194

 190

 169

 163

 156

 150

 155

 156

 160

 159

 167

 148

 176

 172

 136

 166

 170

 257

 248

 251

 239

 232

 219

 217

 212

 209

 209

 207

 207

 207

 203

 182

 173

 163

 160

 163

 168

 171

 173

 175

 179

 187

 184

 182

 182

 184

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,163

 7,285

 6,495

 5,804

 5,232

 4,710

 4,243

 3,877

 3,604

 3,435

 3,334

 3,259

 3,178

 3,117

 3,042

 2,967

 2,879

 2,800

 2,731

 2,680

 2,634

 2,595

 2,561

 2,531

 2,511

 2,488

 2,463

 2,442

 2,444

 583

 520

 464

 415

 374

 336

 303

 277

 257

 245

 238

 233

 227

 223

 217

 212

 206

 200

 195

 191

 188

 185

 183

 181

 179

 178

 176

 174

 175

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Everett Greene, Appellant, v. Leander B. Faber, Individually and as Receiver, etc., Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Present—Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
October 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* SPRING SHASTA EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW CR. P. P. RELEASE RELEASE - C.F.S. C. F. S.

DAY ELEV RES. CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE C. F. S. POWER SPILL FISHTRA

P

(1)

20,782

1 584.01 21,896 1,114 4,674 39 4,190 4,105 0 0 7

2 583.50 21,587 -309 3,955 39 3,494 4,108 0 0 3

3 583.52 21,599 12 4,117 39 3,625 4,107 0 0 4

4 582.89 21,217 -382 3,941 39 3,500 4,132 0 0 2

5 584.07 21,933 716 4,469 39 4,019 4,106 0 0 2

6 585.51 22,827 894 4,563 51 4,023 4,109 0 0 3

7 585.38 22,746 -81 4,077 39 3,624 4,115 0 0 3

8 585.58 22,871 125 4,175 39 3,703 4,105 0 0 7

9 585.23 22,651 -220 4,002 39 3,594 4,107 0 0 6

10 585.46 22,796 145 4,180 39 3,764 4,105 0 0 2

11 585.08 22,557 -239 3,990 39 3,568 4,107 0 0 3

12 584.40 22,137 -420 3,832 61 3,401 4,041 0 0 3

13 583.86 21,805 -332 3,882 73 3,394 4,045 0 0 4

14 584.20 22,013 208 4,039 73 3,522 3,931 0 0 3

15 583.85 21,799 -214 3,812 73 3,297 3,917 0 0 3

16 583.56 21,623 -176 3,856 73 3,371 3,942 0 0 3

17 582.59 21,038 -585 3,661 50 3,175 3,954 0 0 2

18 583.37 21,508 470 4,194 35 3,727 3,955 0 0 2

19 583.59 21,641 133 4,023 35 3,576 3,954 0 0 2

20 583.82 21,781 140 4,029 35 3,596 3,955 0 0 3

21 584.19 22,007 226 4,072 35 3,642 3,955 0 0 3

22 583.68 21,696 -311 3,803 35 3,362 3,957 0 0 3

23 584.12 21,964 268 4,091 35 3,656 3,953 0 0 3

24 584.75 22,353 389 4,123 0 3,757 3,925 0 0 2

25 583.13 21,362 -991 3,413 0 3,262 3,911 0 0 2

26 582.33 20,883 -479 3,668 0 3,456 3,907 0 0 2

27 581.42 20,346 -537 3,636 9 3,360 3,905 0 0 2

28 580.90 20,042 -304 3,756 36 3,466 3,906 0 0 3

29 580.62 19,881 -161 3,829 35 3,601 3,909 0 0 1

30 581.03 20,118 237 4,033 35 3,789 3,912 0 0 2

31 581.43 20,352 234 4,027 35 3,788 3,907 0 0 2

TOTALS -430 123,922 1,204 111,302 124,047 0 0 92

ACRE-FEET -430 245,799 2,388 220,768 246,047 0 0 182

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 246,047

Spill 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/1/2022
Fish Trap 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/1/2022
487 P.2d 126

#### Petition of Dominico QUINTANA and Alice Quintana to adopt Deborah Jean Quintana and Marvin James Quintana. Anastacia Garcia QUINTANA, Appellant, v. Dominico QUINTANA and Alice Quintana, Appellees.

No. 9211.

Supremo Court of New Mexico.

June 28, 1971.

Vaughan, Marek & Paone, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Roberto L. Armijo, Las Vegas, for appellees.

OPINION

McMANUS, Justice.

The defendant appeals from an order of the District Court of San Miguel County, New Mexico, dispensing with the defendant’s consent to the adoption of her two children by the paternal grandparents.

Consent was dispensed with pursuant to § 22-2-6(A) (3), N.M.S.A. (1967 Supp..). Supreme Court Rule 5 (2) states:

> “Appeals shall also be allowed by the district court, and entertained by the Supreme Court, in all civil actions, from such interlocutory judgments, orders or decisions of the district courts, as practically dispose of the merits of the action, so that any further proceeding therein would be only to carry into effect such interlocutory judgment, order or decision. Appeals shall also be allowed by the district court, and entertained by the Supreme Court, from all final orders affecting a substantial right made after entry of final judgment. * * *”

Defendant’s appeal is not timely since the merits of the action were not disposed of with this order waiving the defendant’s consent to the adoption. The trial court must conclude the matter with a hearing on the final adoption. This as yet has not been done.

This Court further holds as it has in the past on its own motion that it is without *699jurisdiction in the matter where the order lacks finality due to the absence of the necessary determination and order of the trial court. Pacheco v. Pacheco, 82 N.M. 486, 484 P.2d 328 (1971); Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Miles, 80 N.M. 237, 453 P.2d 757 (1969).

The appeal is dismissed. It is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., and STEPHENSON J., concur.
(No. 78-CC-2266

#### Ryg & Stahly Implements, Claimants, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed April 18,1979.*

This cause is before the Court on the motion of Respondent to withdraw a motion to dismiss hereto*938fore filed. In support of its motion, Respondent states that the motion to dismiss was filed through inadvertance, and that a departmental report received from the Department of Conservation shows that the claim herein should be allowed.

As departmental reports are prima facie evidence of the matter set forth therein, the Court finds that there is no disputed issue of material fact, and that Claimant is entitled to judgment.

It is therefore ordered that Respondent be, and hereby is, granted leave to withdraw its motion to dismiss.

It is further ordered that Claimant be, and hereby awarded the sum of $905.88 in full satisfaction of its claim.