alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                               CERTIFICATE OF THE
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            OF X-RITE, INCORPORATED.

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350):

         I, Mary E. Chowning, Chief Financial Officer of X-Rite, Incorporated,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

         (1) The annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ending January
3, 2004,(the "Report") which this statement accompanies, fully complies with
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and;

         (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of X-Rite,
Incorporated, as of and for the periods covered by this Report.


Date: March 16, 2004
                                       By: /s/ Mary E. Chowning
                                          ---------------------
                                               Mary E. Chowning


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to X-Rite, Incorporated, and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 358

 370

 373

 393

 428

 450

 487

 527

 541

 582

 615

 623

 669

 725

 764

 796

 808

 829

 851

 861

 881

 892

 940

 926

 937

 931

 938

 935

 937

 961

 963

 333

 335

 338

 336

 350

 352

 361

 383

 402

 432

 453

 472

 488

 520

 540

 577

 571

 584

 599

 626

 664

 679

 703

 710

 721

 740

 731

 694

 606

 609

 655

 347

 350

 360

 371

 383

 395

 420

 451

 468

 502

 535

 548

 565

 602

 638

 655

 660

 684

 723

 750

 778

 795

 812

 816

 825

 834

 833

 827

 816

 820

 820

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
#### Alonzo C. Monson, et al., Appellants, *v.*Marcus A. Littell, Respondent.

(Argued January 23, 1878;

decided February 5, 1878.)

*Jas. W. Gerard*for appellants.

*L. B. Halsey*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
### §472. Uttering counterfeit obligations or securities

Whoever, with intent to defraud, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or with like intent brings into the United States or keeps in possession or conceals any falsely made, forged, counterfeited, or altered obligation or other security of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §374(c), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 340.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §265 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §151, 35 Stat. 1116).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–56 substituted "20 years" for "fifteen years".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,531

 2,299

 2,283

 2,147

 2,205

 2,050

 2,058

 2,244

 2,486

 2,665

 3,248

 3,388

 3,526

 3,243

 2,688

 2,451

 2,297

 2,224

 2,430

 2,360

 2,481

 2,482

 2,515

 2,543

 2,400

 2,169

 2,211

 2,313

 2,592

 2,030

 1,054

 1,048

 1,050

 1,073

 1,072

 1,088

 1,064

 1,028

 1,078

 1,081

 1,100

 1,151

 1,166

 1,046

 1,070

 1,077

 1,070

 1,081

 1,073

 1,104

 1,070

 1,063

 1,044

 1,029

 1,014

 961

 927

 976

 948

 781

 1,498

 1,385

 1,400

 1,434

 1,459

 1,384

 1,351

 1,412

 1,477

 1,507

 1,624

 1,831

 1,812

 1,644

 1,490

 1,445

 1,428

 1,424

 1,495

 1,470

 1,458

 1,439

 1,433

 1,450

 1,434

 1,353

 1,325

 1,457

 1,459

 1,201

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 19,361

 19,332

 19,316

 19,422

 19,534

 19,559

 19,629

 19,799

 19,996

 20,183

 20,448

 20,882

 21,139

 21,218

 21,210

 21,270

 21,298

 21,288

 21,324

 21,410

 21,517

 21,544

 21,500

 21,443

 21,253

 20,775

 20,288

 20,101

 20,070

 19,826

 1,383

 1,381

 1,380

 1,387

 1,395

 1,397

 1,402

 1,414

 1,428

 1,442

 1,461

 1,492

 1,510

 1,516

 1,515

 1,519

 1,521

 1,521

 1,523

 1,529

 1,537

 1,539

 1,536

 1,532

 1,518

 1,484

 1,449

 1,436

 1,434

 1,416

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.1 Production and removal of beer.

The regulations in this part relate to beer and cereal beverages and cover the location, construction, equipment, operations and qualifications of breweries and pilot brewing plants.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10264 Conference Calendar

MARVIN LEE BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CV-214-Y

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marvin Lee Bell, federal prisoner # 40037-004, filed a pro

se and in forma pauperis (IFP) complaint against the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) alleging violations of his civil rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The district court ordered that Bell’s complaint be dismissed as frivolous. Bell did not appeal the district court’s judgment; however, nearly 10 months later, he filed a motion to recuse the districtNo. 98-10264 -2- judge. After the district court denied the motion, Bell filed a notice of appeal. In his appellate brief, he argues both that the court should have recused itself and that his complaint should not have been dismissed as frivolous. Because Bell failed to timely evince his intent to appeal the district court’s order of dismissal, this court has no jurisdiction to address the issues generated by such dismissal.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Regarding the court’s failure to recuse itself, Bell has failed to demonstrate a reasonable basis for questioning the court’s impartiality. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455(a); United States v. Merkt , 794 F.2d 950, 960 (5th Cir. 1986). Bell’s motions for injunctive relief, for the appointment of counsel, and to seal the records are DENIED. AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
### §1234f. Compliance agreements

#### (a) Discretionary authority; purposes of agreement

In accordance with section 1234c of this title, the Secretary may enter into a compliance agreement with a recipient under an applicable program. The purpose of any compliance agreement under this section shall be to bring the recipient into full compliance with the applicable requirements of law as soon as feasible and not to excuse or remedy past violations of such requirements.

#### (b) Procedures applicable

(1) Before entering into a compliance agreement with a recipient, the Secretary shall hold a hearing at which the recipient, affected students and parents or their representatives, and other interested parties are invited to participate. The recipient shall have the burden of persuading the Secretary that full compliance with the applicable requirements of law is not feasible until a future date.

(2) If the Secretary determines, on the basis of all the evidence presented, that full compliance is genuinely not feasible until a future date, the Secretary shall make written findings to that effect and shall publish those findings, along with the substance of any compliance agreement, in the Federal Register.

#### (c) Contents

A compliance agreement under this section shall contain—

(1) an expiration date not later than 3 years from the date of the written findings under subsection (b)(2), by which the recipient shall be in full compliance with the applicable requirements of law, and

(2) those terms and conditions with which the recipient must comply until it is in full compliance.

#### (d) Failure of recipient to comply with terms and conditions

If a recipient fails to comply with the terms and conditions of a compliance agreement under this section, the Secretary may consider that compliance agreement to be no longer in effect, and the Secretary may take any action authorized by law with respect to the recipient.

(Pub. L. 90–247, title IV, §457, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3501(a), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 355.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 28, 1988, but not applicable to recipients receiving written notice to return funds prior to that date, see section 3501(b) of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1234 of this title.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 2, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00820-CV

FATIMA LOVE, Appellant

V.

BLENSHIRE VILLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-003158-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Lewis

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated February 12, 2013, we 

notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both her 

brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file her 

brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

To date, appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with 

the Court regarding the status of her brief. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

120820F.P05

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FATIMA LOVE, Appellant

No. 05-12-00820-CV V.

BLENSHIRE VILLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-003158-B.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Lang 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee BLENSHIRE VILLAS recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant FATIMA LOVE.

Judgment entered this 2nd day of August, 2013.

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
#### The Robert S. Denham Company, Respondent, *v.*Edwin E. Salt, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1914, denying a motion to open default, and also from an order entered on the 16th day of February; 1914, denying a motion for reargument.

Per Curiam:

The order denying the motion to open the default should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment granted on payment of the costs as taxed. The order denying the motion for a reargument of the motion to open the default is affirmed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order denying motion to open default reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment of costs to be taxed. Order denying motion for reargument affirmed, without costs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 268

 267

 262

 270

 295

 313

 321

 383

 489

 607

 666

 548

 416

 339

 338

 350

 367

 375

 372

 344

 356

 406

 369

 386

 357

 368

 409

 428

 523

 419

 356

 237

 237

 237

 237

 238

 235

 225

 239

 253

 259

 263

 263

 258

 254

 255

 251

 246

 256

 253

 248

 250

 248

 244

 243

 239

 234

 236

 237

 244

 239

 237

 247

 245

 244

 245

 252

 255

 253

 275

 318

 348

 353

 338

 310

 293

 285

 285

 284

 289

 280

 273

 277

 284

 276

 276

 271

 273

 287

 297

 321

 296

 271

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,430

 3,429

 3,431

 3,435

 3,448

 3,465

 3,479

 3,514

 3,590

 3,692

 3,796

 3,885

 3,940

 3,976

 4,014

 4,054

 4,094

 4,138

 4,166

 4,184

 4,208

 4,217

 4,175

 4,103

 4,021

 3,956

 3,933

 3,937

 3,973

 3,984

 3,971

 245

 245

 245

 245

 246

 248

 249

 251

 256

 264

 271

 278

 281

 284

 287

 290

 292

 296

 298

 299

 301

 301

 298

 293

 287

 283

 281

 281

 284

 285

 284

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Herman Rakov, Respondent, v. Bankers Life Insurance Company of the City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the declaration of the insured to the witness Perlstein were hearsay and incompetent and so prejudicial as to require a new trial. All concurred; Merrell, J., not sitting.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 16

- 00338

- CV

IN RE Allen Jackie JONES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On May 31, 2016

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013

- CI

- 04328, styled In re Marriage of Tetyana Jones and Allen Jackie

Jone s , pending in the 5 7th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00065-CV

TWI XVIII, Inc. and Texas Wings, 

Inc.

v.

Christopher S. Carroll Number 1, 

Ltd.

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (2009-30008-211)

April 11, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After reviewing appellants’ TWI XVIII, Inc. and Texas Wings, Inc.’s motion 

for rehearing, we deny the motion. We withdraw our February 7, 2013 opinion 

and judgment and substitute the following.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and 

holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellants TWI XVIII, Inc. and Texas Wings, Inc. 

shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
2

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By_________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5597 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, 

Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5597 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CLARA LUPER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in 

4 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clara Luper Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 951

 955

 990

 987

 992

 981

 1,021

 983

 1,021

 1,003

 1,022

 1,000

 970

 996

 1,019

 1,068

 1,073

 1,097

 1,082

 1,110

 1,127

 1,036

 1,038

 1,074

 1,020

 1,002

 985

 986

 954

 953

 925

 816

 833

 842

 817

 832

 690

 784

 821

 794

 857

 751

 733

 792

 728

 793

 799

 738

 775

 772

 781

 863

 845

 818

 837

 883

 873

 841

 901

 823

 865

 834

 875

 890

 902

 897

 903

 858

 908

 889

 898

 920

 891

 889

 907

 885

 909

 950

 911

 904

 959

 962

 1,000

 951

 933

 963

 953

 957

 928

 944

 897

 920

 886

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 668

 664

 664

 649

 636

 627

 658

 652

 638

 633

 655

 678

 693

 678

 674

 655

 646

 601

 616

 640

 675

 707

 726

 785

 798

 805

 824

 853

 847

 910

 499

 489

 487

 484

 488

 488

 467

 509

 491

 491

 488

 507

 508

 504

 507

 507

 496

 482

 485

 489

 502

 524

 527

 545

 571

 565

 575

 573

 582

 598

 566

 558

 552

 548

 538

 541

 554

 554

 535

 535

 536

 554

 558

 551

 554

 549

 534

 522

 524

 538

 552

 578

 590

 617

 636

 640

 646

 661

 662

 704

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41347

Conference Calendar

 

JERRY W. MURRAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOBBY PORTER; STEVE GAMBLE; HOWARD BALDWIN; 

JO ALENE KIRKEL; PAUL K. RILEY; ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ; 

JOHN CORNYN, Attorney General, State of Texas,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CV-176-TJW

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry W. Murray filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (“IFP”) in the district court. The district court

entered an order denying Murray’s IFP motion and Murray now

appeals from that order. Subsequent to the district court’s

denial of Murray’s IFP application, Murray paid the district
No. 02-41347

-2-

court filing fees and costs. On appeal, he seeks to have the

district court’s IFP denial vacated, to be found indigent, and

to have his filing fees and costs reimbursed to him. 

Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter because

it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live

case or controversy. Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co., 141 F.3d

224, 227 (5th Cir. 1998). By paying the filing fee in the

district court, Murray rendered this appeal moot. Accordingly,

the appeal is dismissed. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Murray also moves

to have his appellate filing fees reimbursed. That motion is

denied. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF APPELLATE

FILING FEES DENIED.
#### § 31.204 Mixed cocktails.

A retail liquor dealer who mixes cocktails or compounds any alcoholic liquors in advance of sale, as provided in § 31.233, may not use liquor bottles in which distilled spirits have been previously packaged for the storage of the mixture or compound pending that sale.

(26 U.S.C. 5301)