alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         347,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               577,518
<PP&E>                                          61,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 748,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,120,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,968
<OTHER-SE>                                   (383,072)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   748,987
<SALES>                                         66,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,687
<CGS>                                          123,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,372,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,405)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,325,556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.31 Brewery buildings.

Brewery buildings shall be arranged and constructed to afford adequate protection to the revenue and to facilitate inspection by appropriate TTB officers.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5402))
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.282 Beer.

When beer has been laden on board the aircraft for use as supplies, the customs officer shall execute his certificate on both copies of the Form 1582-B (5130.6) or Form 1689 (5130.12), as the case may be, forward the original to the appropriate TTB officer designated on the form, and retain the copy for his files.

(46 Stat. 690, as amended, 72 Stat. 1334, 1335; 19 U.S.C. 1309, 26 U.S.C. 5053, 5055)

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7006, 34 FR 2251, Feb. 15, 1969. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan. 27, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.40

 1,198.41

 1,198.40

 1,198.40

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.39

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.37

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.44

 1,198.51

 1,198.56

 1,198.52

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.49

 1,198.48

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.43

 1,198.43

 48.60

 48.62

 48.60

 48.60

 48.60

 48.58

 48.58

 48.58

 48.56

 48.55

 48.53

 48.55

 48.55

 48.53

 48.51

 48.71

 48.69

 48.67

 48.79

 48.88

 48.81

 48.76

 48.72

 48.71

 48.76

 48.74

 48.72

 48.71

 48.69

 48.65

 48.65

STORAGE

-0.04

+0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.20

-0.02

-0.02

+0.12

+0.09

-0.07

-0.05

-0.04

-0.02

+0.05

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

CHANGE

112

149

123

133

132

117

122

123

109

104

98

118

110

96

85

278

165

152

287

320

205

182

174

174

235

193

179

170

165

141

155

INFLOW

 122

 130

 122

 122

 122

 114

 114

 114

 107

 99

 92

 99

 99

 92

 85

 173

 164

 155

 220

 271

 230

 201

 182

 173

 201

 191

 182

 173

 164

 147

 147

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 7

 9

 9

 10

 9

 11

 7

 8

 10

 13

 14

 9

 10

 12

 8

 6

 9

 5

 3

 3

 10

 7

 9

 9

 6

 10

 5

 5

 9

 11

 7

C.F.S.

 .13

 .16

 .15

 .17

 .16

 .19

 .13

 .14

 .17

 .22

 .24

 .16

 .18

 .21

 .14

 .10

 .16

 .09

 .05

 .05

 .17

 .12

 .16

 .16

 .10

 .17

 .08

 .08

 .16

 .20

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .09

 .02

 .14

 .17

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/07/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.02 4,906 31 4,607 260 4.52 .71

ACRE-FEET -20 9,731 61 9,138 516

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 9,138

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 9,199

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2018 25.04

 48.63

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 25.04
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 423.65

 423.25

 423.15

 422.99

 422.69

 422.48

 422.34

 422.18

 421.90

 421.66

 421.40

 421.09

 420.87

 420.77

 420.59

 420.28

 419.99

 419.71

 419.48

 419.23

 418.99

 418.79

 418.49

 418.24

 418.05

 417.77

 417.48

 417.18

 416.79

 416.40

 558.4

 555.0

 554.2

 552.8

 550.3

 548.5

 547.4

 546.0

 543.7

 541.7

 539.5

 537.0

 535.1

 534.3

 532.8

 530.3

 527.9

 525.6

 523.7

 521.7

 519.8

 518.1

 515.7

 513.7

 512.2

 509.9

 507.6

 505.2

 502.1

 499.0

STORAGE

-3.5

-3.4

-0.8

-1.4

-2.5

-1.8

-1.2

-1.3

-2.3

-2.0

-2.2

-2.6

-1.8

-0.8

-1.5

-2.6

-2.4

-2.3

-1.9

-2.0

-2.0

-1.6

-2.4

-2.0

-1.5

-2.2

-2.3

-2.4

-3.1

-3.1

CHANGE

917

1,206

1,840

1,571

934

1,456

1,793

1,466

1,023

1,259

1,224

1,086

1,420

1,864

1,515

1,001

1,041

1,200

1,372

1,268

1,283

1,442

1,054

1,380

1,587

1,186

1,107

988

678

836

INFLOW

 2,498

 2,733

 2,100

 2,102

 2,077

 2,212

 2,249

 2,018

 2,075

 2,142

 2,192

 2,263

 2,203

 2,162

 2,160

 2,189

 2,131

 2,232

 2,213

 2,197

 2,158

 2,124

 2,145

 2,270

 2,244

 2,199

 2,159

 2,095

 2,155

 2,309

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 155

 151

 149

 131

 110

 108

 121

 107

 102

 100

 98

 96

 108

 100

 91

 93

 105

 101

 97

 90

 100

 108

 104

 109

 109

 100

 102

 95

 86

 83

PUMPING

 14

 28

 17

 20

 14

 23

 14

 17

 25

 22

 22

 25

 25

 17

 11

 6

 8

 17

 8

 8

 11

 25

 27

 19

 8

 19

 16

 8

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .05

 .10

 .06

 .07

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .06

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .09

 .06

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .03

 .07

 .06

 .03

 .01

 .01

INCHES

 .34

 .00

 .58

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .01

 .63

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .33

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -62.9 37,997 66,006 0 0 3,209 480 1.73 2.29

ACRE-FEET -62,900 75,367 130,923 0 0 6,365 952

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 130,923

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 6,365

TOTAL 137,288

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 2.61

 561.9

OUTLET 0 2.29

Table 11
#### § 19.95 Issuance of operating permits.

TTB will issue only one operating permit for a distilled spirits plant. The permit will designate the operations that are authorized at the plant. The proprietor must post the permit at the distilled spirits plant and have it available for inspection by appropriate TTB officers.

(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5271)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 580.20

 580.21

 580.40

 580.68

 580.23

 580.29

 579.89

 579.74

 580.96

 583.38

 584.13

 585.48

 585.58

 585.21

 584.66

 583.57

 583.31

 582.09

 585.07

 582.95

 581.69

 580.57

 580.48

 580.03

 580.85

 582.38

 582.75

 582.38

 19,639

 19,645

 19,754

 19,916

 19,656

 19,691

 19,462

 19,378

 20,077

 21,514

 21,970

 22,808

 22,871

 22,639

 22,297

 21,629

 21,471

 20,740

 22,551

 21,253

 20,504

 19,852

 19,800

 19,541

 20,014

 20,913

 21,134

 20,913

STORAGE

+239

+6

+109

+162

-260

+35

-229

-84

+699

+1,437

+456

+838

+63

-232

-342

-668

-158

-731

+1,811

-1,298

-749

-652

-52

-259

+473

+899

+221

-221

CHANGE

3,470

3,354

3,396

3,390

3,146

3,277

3,297

3,682

3,807

4,197

3,543

3,597

3,108

2,878

2,720

2,555

2,809

2,526

3,846

2,245

2,376

2,445

2,707

2,579

2,951

3,163

2,729

2,577

INFLOW

 3,264

 3,265

 3,255

 3,222

 3,190

 3,173

 3,285

 3,624

 3,320

 3,384

 3,227

 3,089

 2,990

 2,909

 2,805

 2,805

 2,804

 2,809

 2,847

 2,812

 2,666

 2,688

 2,646

 2,623

 2,627

 2,625

 2,533

 2,603

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 41

 0

 48

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 15

 2

 4

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 2

 3

 1

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 5, 2014

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,513 86,370 83,090 89 2,380 50

ACRE-FEET +1,513 171,315 164,809 177 4,721 99

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 164,809

SPILL 177

 19,400

FISH TRAP 4,721

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 392

 778

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 3,350

 3,261

 3,354

 3,331

 3,144

 3,312

 3,238

 3,774

 3,779

 4,079

 3,415

 3,496

 3,152

 2,864

 2,595

 2,466

 2,691

 2,492

 3,762

 2,322

 2,467

 2,569

 2,678

 2,714

 2,794

 3,061

 2,132

 2,336

 84,628

 167,860
### SUBCHAPTER II—LIBRARY SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGY
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Jon D. Berkley                                                      | Dated:   |  June      18, 2010 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------|
|   | Jon      D. Berkley                                                          |               |                     |
| Title: | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |               |                     |
|   |                                                                         |               |                     |
|   |                                                                         |               |                     |
| By:    | /s/      Bruce A. Shepard                                                    | Dated:   |  June      18, 2010 |
|   | Bruce      A. Shepard                                                        |               |                     |
| Title: | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer)               |               |                     |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30192

Summary Calendar

 

LEWIS BURTON ROBERTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

ET AL,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-203

- - - - - - - - - -

November 20, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lewis Burton Roberts, prisoner # 92317, appeals the summary

judgment dismissing of his civil rights action filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Lewis has failed to demonstrate deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs with regard to his

claims that available medication was substituted for unavailable

medication, half band-aids were used in place of full band-aids,

the defendants failed to give his crutches, he received only two

antibiotics in two days, he was unable to obtain relief through 
No. 98-30192

-2-

the prison’s administrative remedy procedures, and a special

brace was lost and never replaced. See Johnson v. Treen, 759

F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1985). At most, Roberts has shown

negligence on the part of defendants. As such, his claims are

not actionable under § 1983. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S.

825, 838 (1994). 

This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

It is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th

Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Additionally, Roberts is warned that future frivolous

appeals will invite the imposition of sanctions. Roberts should

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

frivolous arguments. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ryerson Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Terence R. Rogers, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Terence R. Rogers                                
|Terence R. Rogers                                    
|Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

March 15, 2011



88
### Part B—Special Incentive Grants
### §107d–1. Grievances of blind licensees

#### (a) Hearing and arbitration

Any blind licensee who is dissatisfied with any action arising from the operation or administration of the vending facility program may submit to a State licensing agency a request for a full evidentiary hearing, which shall be provided by such agency in accordance with section 107b(6) of this title. If such blind licensee is dissatisfied with any action taken or decision rendered as a result of such hearing, he may file a complaint with the Secretary who shall convene a panel to arbitrate the dispute pursuant to section 107d–2 of this title, and the decision of such panel shall be final and binding on the parties except as otherwise provided in this chapter.

#### (b) Noncompliance by Federal departments and agencies; complaints by State licensing agencies; arbitration

Whenever any State licensing agency determines that any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States that has control of the maintenance, operation, and protection of Federal property is failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter or any regulations issued thereunder (including a limitation on the placement or operation of a vending facility as described in section 107(b) of this title and the Secretary's determination thereon) such licensing agency may file a complaint with the Secretary who shall convene a panel to arbitrate the dispute pursuant to section 107d–2 of this title, and the decision of such panel shall be final and binding on the parties except as otherwise provided in this chapter.

(June 20, 1936, ch. 638, §5, as added Pub. L. 93–516, title II, §206, Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1626; Pub. L. 93–651, title II, §206, Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–11.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The content of Pub. L. 93–516, including provisions of section 206 thereof which enacted this section, were originally contained in H.R. 14225, 93rd Congress, Second Session, which was pocket-vetoed during the 31-day intrasession adjournment of the 93rd Congress for the Congressional elections in November, 1974.

Pursuant to an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Kennedy v. Jones, D.C.D.C. 1976, 412 F.Supp. 353) H.R. 14225 was deemed to have become law without the approval of the President on Nov. 21, 1974, and was given the designation Pub. L. 93–651. Therefore, for purposes of codification, this section should be deemed to have been enacted by Pub. L. 93–651, title II, §206, Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–11, in exactly the same manner as it was enacted by Pub. L. 93–516.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5 of act of June 20, 1936, which was classified to section 107d of this title, was renumbered section 4 by Pub. L. 93–516, §206.
483 P.2d 1322

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 553.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 2, 1971.

Harold B. Albert, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Prank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Garcia was convicted of burglary. He appealed. The only claim of error on appeal is that the trial court erred in not granting appellant’s motion for a continuance.

We affirm.

*Was Garcia Entitled to a Continuance T*

The date of trial was January 27, 1970. Notice of trial was given Garcia on December 5, 1969. On the morning of the trial, Garcia’s trial attorney stated that Garcia was not ready for trial because the day before he was in a hospital and began taking codeine; that this was due to a reinjury of an old chest injury; that Garcia had a sort of drug intoxication and he was not in condition to stand trial. The request to postpone the trial was denied. Garcia did not testify about his health, his lack of preparation for trial, nor file a motion for a continuance supported by oath, § 21-8-7, N.M.S.A. (Repl.Vol. 4), nor present any medical testimony on his ability to be ready for trial.

The attorney on this appeal, appointed by the trial court, was not his trial attorney. However, he presented a good brief and argument. But no reasons could be given that the denial of the postponement was prejudicial, or that substantial justice could be more clearly obtained. See § 21-8-9, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4) on continuance.

The granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial court. There was no abuse of discretion.

We have read and considered the authorities cited by Garcia, and these do not compel a different conclusion.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and HENDLEY, J., concur.