alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2313. Payments to States

#### (a) Certification to Secretary of the Treasury for payment to cooperating States

The Secretary shall from time to time certify to the Secretary of the Treasury for payment to each cooperating State the sums necessary to enable such State as agent of the United States to make payments provided for by this part.

#### (b) Utilization or return of money

All money paid a State under this section shall be used solely for the purposes for which it is paid; and money so paid which is not used for such purposes shall be returned, at the time specified in the agreement under this subpart, to the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (c) Surety bonds

Any agreement under this subpart may require any officer or employee of the State certifying payments or disbursing funds under the agreement or otherwise participating in the performance of the agreement, to give a surety bond to the United States in such amount as the Secretary may deem necessary, and may provide for the payment of the cost of such bond from funds for carrying out the purposes of this part.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title II, §241, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2025; Pub. L. 97–35, title XXV, §2513(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 889.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–35 struck out provisions relating to payment to the State by the Secretary of the Treasury from the Adjustment Assistance Trust Fund prior to audit or settlement by the General Accounting Office.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–35 struck out provisions relating to crediting money returned to the Secretary of the Treasury to the Adjustment Assistance Trust Fund.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment and Transition Provisions

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Aug. 1981, with transition provisions applicable, see section 2514 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 2291 of this title.

#### Termination Date

No trade adjustment assistance, vouchers, allowances, or other payments or benefits may be provided under this part after June 30, 2022, except as otherwise provided, see section 285 of Pub. L. 93–618, as modified by section 406(a)(7) of Pub. L. 114–27, set out as notes preceding section 2271 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 573.47

 573.83

 575.06

 577.74

 579.06

 578.30

 576.98

 575.04

 573.04

 570.93

 568.64

 566.48

 564.30

 562.26

 560.19

 558.25

 557.06

 555.47

 553.31

 551.29

 549.38

 547.43

 545.40

 543.23

 541.05

 538.66

 536.29

 533.93

 532.17

 533.42

 498.6

 500.3

 506.2

 519.3

 525.7

 522.0

 515.5

 506.1

 496.5

 486.5

 475.8

 465.8

 455.8

 446.6

 437.3

 428.8

 423.6

 416.7

 407.4

 398.8

 390.9

 382.8

 374.5

 365.7

 357.1

 347.7

 338.5

 329.6

 323.0

 327.6

STORAGE

+2.9

+1.7

+5.9

+13.0

+6.5

-3.7

-6.5

-9.4

-9.6

-10.0

-10.7

-10.0

-10.0

-9.2

-9.2

-8.6

-5.2

-6.9

-9.3

-8.5

-8.0

-8.1

-8.3

-8.7

-8.7

-9.4

-9.2

-9.0

-6.6

+4.7

CHANGE

5,762

5,911

10,731

16,995

14,695

8,682

7,112

6,428

6,522

6,344

5,702

5,816

5,885

6,167

5,771

5,711

7,038

6,488

5,627

5,965

6,279

6,257

6,253

6,090

6,016

5,637

5,794

5,709

6,279

11,706

INFLOW

 24

 33

 532

 766

 115

 30

 30

 281

 506

 614

 894

 1,057

 1,138

 1,156

 1,151

 1,147

 1,147

 1,147

 1,143

 1,148

 1,150

 1,143

 1,145

 1,136

 1,059

 1,068

 1,132

 1,135

 1,133

 1,142

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,053

 996

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,483

 1,425

 1,551

 1,823

 2,045

 2,045

 1,949

 1,893

 1,892

 1,929

 2,044

 2,109

 2,104

 1,981

 1,897

 1,961

 2,004

 2,072

 2,111

 2,102

 2,100

 2,133

 2,268

 2,314

 2,295

 2,265

 2,248

 2,056

 1,417

 1,163

FRIANT-KERN

 17

 23

 17

 49

 11

 13

 33

 22

 20

 15

 12

 22

 28

 1

 27

 4

 23

 27

 39

 11

 22

 21

 1

 32

 15

 14

 14

 17

 25

 23

C.F.S.

 .11

 .15

 .11

 .31

 .07

 .08

 .21

 .14

 .13

 .10

 .08

 .15

 .19

 .01

 .19

 .03

 .16

 .19

 .28

 .08

 .16

 .16

 .01

 .25

 .12

 .11

 .11

 .14

 .21

 .19

INCHES

 .00

 .56

 .94

 .80

 .39

 .00

 .09

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .63

 .02

 .22

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .73

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 9, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -168.1 215,372 25,302 58,679 2,049 598 4.23 4.78

ACRE-FEET -168,068 427,190 50,187 116,390 4,064 1,186

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 116,390

 50,187 594,075

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 18.62

 495.7

 423,434 4.78

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 2,793

 3,561

 5,649

 7,784

 8,199

 7,485

 8,361

 8,978

 8,943

 8,829

 8,167

 7,678

 7,646

 7,677

 7,353

 6,919

 6,491

 6,718

 7,003

 7,013

 7,034

 7,030

 7,022

 7,018

 7,014

 7,015

 7,021

 7,028

 7,031

 7,018

RIVER

 213,478

 423,434

RIVER

Table 15
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.35 Execution under penalties of perjury. ( a ) When any form or document prescribed by this part is required to be executed under penalties of perjury, the permittee or other authorized person shall: ( 1 ) Insert the declaration “I declare under the penalties of perjury that I have examined this __________(insert the type of document such as claim, application, statement, report, certificate), including all supporting documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete”; and
( 2 ) Sign the document.
( b ) When the required document already bears a perjury declaration, the permittee or other authorized person shall sign the document.
(Act of August 16, 1954, 68A Stat. 745 (26 U.S.C. 6056))
No. 12,194.

#### Blackmer *v.*Blackmer, et al.

Decided November 12, 1928.

Rehearing denied November 26, 1928.

Messrs. Enos, Healy & Chrisholm, Mr. Harold W. Perry, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Charles E. Friend, for defendants in error.

*541
      *En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Whitford

delivered the opinion of the court.

The question before us is upon a motion to dismiss the writ of error under rule 8. This rule provides that: “The party claiming error in the trial of any case must, unless otherwise ordered by the trial court, move that court for a new trial, and, without such order, only questions presented in such motion will be considered on review. ’ ’

The judgment order complained of was for temporary alimony, attorneys ’ fees, and court costs. The court below heard the testimony of the plaintiff, and of the defendant, as to the necessities of the plaintiff, and the ability of the husband to pay. It thus appears that the questions presented to the trial court were issues of fact. The issues of fact heard and determined by the trial court cannot be reviewed in this court, in the absence of a motion for a new trial, or an order dispensing therewith, in the record.

Under rule 8 the record is insufficient to authorize a review. *Lapham v. Phillips,*81 Colo. 449, 255 Pac. 1100.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error must be granted, and it is so ordered.
MARISOL CARVAJAL-GARCIA 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

1600 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 227 

ALICE, TEXAS 78332 

361.668.4989 PHONE 

361.664.1003 FACSIMILE 

January 8, 2015 

Via E-FILE

Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

Supreme Court Building 

201 West 14th Street, Room 106 

Austin, Texas 78701

 Re: Cause No. _______; Enrique Gonzalez, Jr. vs. State of Texas 

Dear Mr. Acosta: 

 In reference to the above-styled cause, enclosed herewith for filing please find 

Appellant’s First Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review. 

 

 Opposing counsel is being provided with a copy of the same by the method indicated 

below. 

 If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

 Sincerely, 

 /s/ Marisol Carvajal-Garcia

 Marisol Carvajal-Garcia 

MCG/jac 

Enclosure 

xc: Enrique Gonzalez, Jr. 

 

 Office of the District Attorney Via EMAIL 

 229th Judicial District 

 

PD-0036-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 1/8/2015 9:28:08 AM

Accepted 1/15/2015 4:22:41 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
NO. ______________

ENRIQUE GONZALEZ, JR. § IN THE COURT OF

§

VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Enrique Gonzalez, Jr., Appellant in the above styled and 

numbered cause, and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file a petition for 

discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following:

1. On December 10, 2014, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's 

conviction. Enrique Gonzalez, Jr. v. State, Appellate Cause No. 04-13-00708-CR. 

This petition is therefore due on January 9, 2015.

2. Counsel has been unable to complete the petition for the following 

reasons: Trial Counsel's law partner was elected Jim Wells County Court at Law 

Judge and commenced work on January 1, 2015. Thus trial counsel has acquired a 

substantial case load. This Motion is not sought for delay but that justice may be 

done.

3. The undersigned conferred with Rumaldo Solis, Jr., Assistant District 

Attorney for the 229th Judicial District, who indicated there was no opposition to this 
request.

4. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully 

requests an extension of 30 days, i.e. until February 10, 2015, to file a petition for 

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

Marisol Carvajal-Garcia

Attorney at Law

1600 E. Main St., Suite 227

Alice, Texas 78332

Tel: 361.668.4989

Fax: 361.664.1003

By: /s/ Marisol Carvajal-Garcia

Marisol Carvajal-Garcia

State Bar No. 24065014

marisolcarvajal@hotmail.com

Attorney for Enrique Gonzalez, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on January 8, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above 

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Duval 

County, P.O. Drawer 1061, San Diego, Texas 78384, by E-mail.

/s/ Marisol Carvajal-Garcia

Marisol Carvajal-Garcia
#### Teresa M. Bradley, Respondent, v. Lester F. Hughes, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,744

 2,332

 2,166

 2,248

 2,207

 1,966

 2,229

 2,611

 3,027

 3,222

 2,667

 2,447

 2,260

 2,394

 2,214

 2,551

 2,470

 2,332

 2,142

 2,483

 2,595

 2,847

 2,915

 2,914

 3,275

 3,572

 3,173

 3,138

 2,985

 2,830

 2,771

 972

 891

 951

 1,028

 989

 988

 958

 953

 960

 986

 970

 869

 866

 854

 874

 858

 959

 936

 929

 931

 947

 942

 1,039

 976

 976

 987

 947

 926

 984

 956

 962

 1,530

 1,354

 1,394

 1,385

 1,351

 1,263

 1,293

 1,353

 1,446

 1,573

 1,405

 1,324

 1,286

 1,280

 1,346

 1,402

 1,396

 1,334

 1,304

 1,358

 1,419

 1,541

 1,502

 1,527

 1,616

 1,796

 1,654

 1,601

 1,565

 1,443

 1,416

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 24,002

 23,613

 23,256

 22,832

 22,363

 21,884

 21,502

 21,193

 20,972

 20,723

 20,331

 19,941

 19,544

 19,237

 19,053

 19,101

 19,103

 19,052

 19,005

 19,100

 19,226

 19,414

 19,470

 19,424

 19,635

 20,107

 20,475

 20,796

 21,015

 21,056

 21,076

 1,714

 1,687

 1,661

 1,631

 1,597

 1,563

 1,536

 1,514

 1,498

 1,480

 1,452

 1,424

 1,396

 1,374

 1,361

 1,364

 1,365

 1,361

 1,358

 1,364

 1,373

 1,387

 1,391

 1,387

 1,403

 1,436

 1,463

 1,485

 1,501

 1,504

 1,505

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Government RegulatoryImpact Model8/29/2006CAC_GRIM_v3.xlsCASH FLOW TOTALS(10)(5)0510152025303540452000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2031

$ millionsBaseStandard1:=I
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### §§ 21.52-21.54 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,355

 1,521

 1,492

 1,514

 1,437

 1,488

 1,528

 1,615

 1,618

 1,726

 1,693

 1,640

 1,869

 1,862

 2,016

 2,072

 2,248

 2,047

 2,449

 2,286

 2,143

 2,100

 1,965

 1,879

 1,724

 1,590

 1,740

 2,107

 2,177

 2,175

 2,281

 785

 774

 794

 768

 766

 771

 786

 765

 779

 793

 812

 828

 851

 897

 879

 892

 987

 984

 1,027

 1,029

 1,007

 1,030

 973

 988

 980

 953

 980

 1,010

 1,125

 1,031

 1,069

 952

 1,022

 1,095

 1,047

 1,013

 1,023

 991

 997

 991

 1,032

 1,089

 1,108

 1,142

 1,159

 1,220

 1,295

 1,416

 1,299

 1,435

 1,385

 1,329

 1,332

 1,261

 1,241

 1,187

 1,152

 1,209

 1,360

 1,417

 1,358

 1,413

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 14,881

 14,991

 15,048

 14,872

 14,702

 14,651

 14,510

 14,416

 14,327

 14,219

 14,158

 14,263

 14,448

 14,661

 14,929

 15,202

 15,523

 15,775

 16,197

 16,559

 16,897

 17,232

 17,502

 17,711

 17,809

 17,853

 17,920

 18,121

 18,318

 18,381

 18,378

 1,063

 1,071

 1,075

 1,062

 1,050

 1,047

 1,036

 1,030

 1,023

 1,016

 1,011

 1,019

 1,032

 1,047

 1,066

 1,086

 1,109

 1,127

 1,157

 1,183

 1,207

 1,231

 1,250

 1,265

 1,272

 1,275

 1,280

 1,294

 1,308

 1,313

 1,313

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5293

_____________________________

MARVIN LEE KING, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

April 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles,

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Carrie Mayfred Flint, Respondent, v. The Provident Life and Trust Company of Philadelphia, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 325

 334

 342

 340

 381

 517

 425

 306

 278

 255

 235

 221

 206

 200

 197

 185

 176

 169

 167

 165

 163

 165

 166

 167

 171

 171

 176

 178

 180

 175

 178

 269

 271

 274

 273

 273

 281

 274

 264

 247

 227

 210

 197

 190

 183

 174

 165

 160

 156

 151

 149

 153

 155

 158

 157

 157

 160

 161

 160

 163

 163

 163

 284

 288

 294

 292

 302

 338

 309

 279

 261

 241

 225

 209

 199

 190

 182

 173

 166

 163

 158

 157

 158

 159

 162

 163

 163

 165

 165

 166

 168

 167

 167

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,962

 3,963

 3,969

 3,979

 4,001

 4,059

 4,088

 4,086

 4,065

 4,023

 3,963

 3,886

 3,803

 3,711

 3,609

 3,494

 3,366

 3,237

 3,093

 2,912

 2,761

 2,641

 2,542

 2,464

 2,402

 2,358

 2,324

 2,300

 2,286

 2,280

 2,281

 283

 283

 284

 284

 286

 290

 292

 292

 290

 287

 283

 278

 272

 265

 258

 250

 240

 231

 221

 208

 197

 189

 182

 176

 172

 168

 166

 164

 163

 163

 163

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(8/13/2012) steam_record - Fw: Request for extension - ELG ICR submittal Page 1

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>, <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov> Date: 9/16/2010 8:53 AM Subject: Fw: Request for extension - ELG ICR submittal

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/ DC/USEPA/US on 09/16/2010 08:52 AM

-----
From: "Joe Settles" <joe.settles@ekpc.coop>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Jerry Purvis" <jerry.purvis@ekpc.coop>

Date: 09/15/2010 04:29 PM

Subject: Request for extension - ELG ICR submittal

Jezebele,

Request for 30-Day Extension EKPC wishes to make a request for a 30 day extension for submittal of the ELG ICR for its Dale, Cooper, and Spurlock Power Stations. Completion of the ICR has been hampered in recent weeks due to several reasons. First, a recent site visit from your agency for review of the ash ponds at Dale Station required EKPC to divert resources from development of the ICR. EKPC was required to gather additional materials as a result of the site visit. Fewer resources have slowed completion of the documents availability for review by legal staff. Legal review of the confidential business information component is critical to EKPC. We are in the process of trying to complete our legal and technical review, and we are confident a 30-day extension would provide sufficient time to thoroughly review the large amount of information for technical and confidentiality purposes. We appreciate your consideration of this request, and we look forward to your response.

Sincerely, Joe

Joe Settles Supervisor, Natural Resources And Environmental Communications East KY Power Cooperative 4775 Lexington Road Winchester, KY 40391(8/13/2012) steam_record - Fw: Request for extension - ELG ICR submittal Page 2

Office: 859-745-9256 Fax: 859-744-6008 Cell: 859-771-3303 Email: joe.settles@ekpc.coop

NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. It is not to be transmitted to or received by anyone other than the named addresses (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee). It is not to be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by replying via email or by calling East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. at (859) 744-4812 so that our address record can be corrected.
#### Samuel Broadbent, Respondent, v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for error in refusal to charge as requested at folio 596 of the record on appeal. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-11-1998
<CASH>                                         573,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  478,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,000
<INVENTORY>                                    252,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,782,000
<PP&E>                                      10,241,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,379,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,756,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,853,000
<BONDS>                                      3,969,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,746,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,756,000
<SALES>                                     11,345,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,514,000
<CGS>                                        3,024,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,098,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,203,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             255,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                166,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (208,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 27

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

#### § 27.120 Persons authorized to receive distilled spirits imported in bulk.

Distilled spirits imported in bulk (*i.e.*, in containers having a capacity in excess of 1 gallon (3.785 liters)) may be entered into a class 8 customs bonded warehouse for bottling, or may be withdrawn from customs custody only if entered for exportation or if withdrawn by a person to whom it is lawful to sell or otherwise dispose of distilled spirits in bulk pursuant to the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (49 Stat. 985, as amended; 27 U.S.C., 206) and subpart E of part 1 of this chapter. The importation and disposition of distilled spirits imported in bulk shall be reported as prescribed by §§ 27.133 to 27.134.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1342, 1361, 1374, 1395 (26 U.S.C. 5114, 5207, 5301, 5555))

[T.D. ATF-34, 41 FR 46864, Oct. 26, 1976, as amended by T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94206, Dec. 22, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.360 Application for employer identification number.

Each manufacturer of cigarette papers and tubes who has neither secured an EIN nor made application therefor shall file an application on IRS Form SS-4. IRS Form SS-4 may be obtained from any service center director or from any district director. Such application shall be filed on or before the seventh day after the date on which any tax return under this subpart is filed. Each manufacturer shall make application for and shall be assigned only one EIN for all internal revenue purposes.

(75 Stat. 828; 26 U.S.C. 6109)