alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9800 Fredericksburg Road

San Antonio, Texas 78288

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE May 13, 2015 Washington, DC 20590

Reference: Amendment to United Services Automobile Association’s Exemption No. 11274 and 11309 in Regulatory Dockets FAA

- 2014

- 0796 and FAA

- 2014

- 0964 to include additional UAS ( U nmanned A ircraft S ystems)

.

Dear Sir or Madam

,

U nited Services Automobile Association (U SAA ) was issued two exemptions, no. 11274 and 11309 (hereinafter refe rred to as the exemptions) for operation in the national airspace. USAA, hereby requests an amendment to the exemptions to allow additional U nmanned A ircraft

S ystems (U AS) with no change s in the conditions and reasons r elative to public interest and safety that were the basis for the FAA granting the original exemptions

.

USAA wishes to operate the following additional UAS:

 Aerialtronics Zenith with integrated Airware system (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11188)

 3DR Iris + (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11490)

 DJI Phantom 2 Vision (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 114 79 )

 DJI Inspire 1 (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11 153A )

 DJI S900 (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11471)

 3DR Spektre (already approved by FAA in prior exemption no. 11206)

 3DR Solo

 DJI Phantom 3

 E

- Flite Apprentice (for training purposes only)

 Drone Deploy system on our exemption no. 11274 and 11309 approved PrecisionHawk

Lancaster UAS

under the same terms and conditions contained in the previously granted exemptions. Attached

and submitted as confidential documents in a separate e

- mail , are the flight operation manuals

for the additional UA S. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the exemptions.

As this is an amendment to existing exemptions requesting only the addition of other types of UAS, USAA respectfully submits that good cause exists so th at notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.9800 Fredericksburg Road

San Antonio, Texas 78288

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for an amendment to the exemptions.

Sincerely,

Kat Swain

Kathleen “Kat” Swain

I nnovation Advisor CFI, MEI, AGI

USAA
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         697
<SECURITIES>                                   15,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,332
<INVENTORY>                                    7,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,949
<PP&E>                                         1,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                 503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 38,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,989
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,715
<COMMON>                                       56,419
<OTHER-SE>                                     (38,821)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   38,329
<SALES>                                        36,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,982
<CGS>                                          28,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.51)
        


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.474 Remission.

Remission of the tax liability on cigarette papers and tubes may be extended to the manufacturer liable for the tax where cigarette papers and tubes in bond are lost (other than by theft) or destroyed, by fire, casualty, or act of God, while in the possession or ownership of such manufacturer. Where cigarette papers and tubes are so lost or destroyed the manufacturer shall report promptly such fact, and the circumstances, to the appropriate TTB officer. If the manufacturer wishes to be relieved of the tax liability, a claim on TTB F 5620.8, in duplicate, shall also be prepared, setting forth the nature, date, place, and extent of the loss or destruction. The original and one copy of the claim, accompanied by such evidence as is necessary to establish to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the claim is valid, shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer. Upon action on the claim by the appropriate TTB officer, the copy of TTB F 5620.8 will be returned to the manufacturer as notice of such action, which copy shall be retained by the manufacturer.

(72 Stat. 1419, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 5707)

Lost or Destroyed
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 317

 313

 319

 315

 318

 313

 310

 312

 309

 309

 308

 309

 306

 310

 316

 320

 322

 317

 315

 326

 328

 323

 336

 322

 346

 318

 315

 312

 275

 275

 295

 293

 288

 293

 288

 287

 289

 298

 298

 285

 297

 299

 298

 300

 300

 306

 303

 294

 309

 288

 301

 311

 304

 309

 307

 305

 305

 300

 307

 308

 307

 307

 305

 303

 302

 302

 301

 300

 302

 303

 304

 306

 308

 310

 311

 311

 318

 315

 317

 316

 317

 313

 312

 309

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### . . ... . 

# l

**EF~ REHC**  **E** SERVICEBULLETIN 910A 

# SERVICE
RlGGINJ PROCEDURE Piper PA-18 and PA-19 

### ATIACHMEN T "A" 

# MEMO

Service Memo No. 19

R!GCING
**PROC~DL"RE: Rz~e**  t!:le forward part of the airplane so t.bat the wheels are just

**c~ear** ofthe ground

**~nd** support it by props under t!i.e

**~-oct** La:idbg

**ge~** B.c:ings. R.iise the tall to approximate levelflight position and Su;J?Ort it t.here. 

### LBVEUNG: Level the airpLane as follows: Drop plum..b bo.b from P. K. Screw in door frame top cham1el to intersect punch maik in enclosure door rear binge. DIHEDRAL ANGLE:

**To~** dihedral angle at !:he frottt spar proceed as follows: Stretch 

### a str..ng alongthe tcp of the

**~** above the front spar. f:om wingtip to wingtip, aDd draw it tight. CheCk the dimension verticallyfrom the string to top offuselage front 

### spar wing hinge fitting. 

### Forcorrect d1hedral this dimensiou should be 

### 3

# t 1/8 iDcbes. To check for equal dihedral in each wing proceed as !oUows: Ustagthe 30 inch level (witbout any spacer blocks) hold tt spanwtse against the bottom of the wiDg under tbe 

### treat spar 1D tbe space between the jury struts and lift sttut attachments. Note theposition of the bubble and do the sameon the other wing. Re-adjust the front struts 

### mtt11 both wings shaw the same

**am~** off level. beiDg careful with each adjustment to set tbe lett st::rut out the same nUD:l.ber of tur.a..s •• the r1gbt one is set in. and vice versa . WASH Otrr: To adjU8C the wash

**o~** ill the wings (dihedralofthe rear spar) proceed as follows: Set a 3/8 i.Deh spacer bloCk oa top of the 30 inch level at one end. Working on the rib adjacent to tbe outer eud of the aileron. hold the level fore aDd 

### att along the bottom of the rib with the spacerblock at the rear and the frout end of the location ol tbe front spar. The correct wash out will exist when the bubble is centered. Adjust tbe rear st:rl.Ea 1n or out to obtain ch.13 condition. TAIL ASSEMBLY: With the airp!.ane in level position the sta.bill%ers should be leveled at their rear spars. The

**hin~** line 3bould be straightfrom tip to tip. Plumb the !in at the rudder hinges . 

## PIPER AIRCRAFT ·**CORPORATIO ~** 

## . .LOCK HAVEN. PA.. U. S. A.
(No. 7108

#### Rock Island County, Illinois, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*7, *1973.*

*339Rock Island County, Illinois, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

THIS COURT FINDS that this expenditure was for the return, by Rock Island County, Illinois, of fugitives from justice. The counties are required to travel to other jurisdictions for the return of fugitives when the fugitives have been located and apprehended in various jurisdictions throughout the country. The expenses herein reflect the expenses incurred by Rock Island County, Illinois, in sending their sheriffs and deputies to return apprehended fugitives. The investigation and reports from the Department of Law Enforcement indicate that the appropriations for this purpose were expended and a deficiency appropriation of $20,000.00 was requested. However, even before the $20,000.00 was received for reimbursing to the various counties for these expenses, it became apparent that even this $20,000.00 deficiency appropriation was going to be inadequate. The original appropriation was expended and the $20,000.00 was used up also, leaving some of these expenses unpaid. Under the rules set forth in *Fergus*vs. *Brady,*277 Ill. 272, this Court finds that inasmuch as the State was unable to anticipate the amount necessary to appropriate for this expense and that since this expenditure was one required of the State by statute, this Court awards the claimant the amount of SIXTY FOUR AND 33/100 DOLLARS ($64.33).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of Spire  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A (the  "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Roger
G. Little,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 24, 2008              By:  /s/ Roger G. Little
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Roger G. Little
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President


            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting the
signatures  that  appear in typed  form  within the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 01028

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 63727

Trial court: 11th Distr ict Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Informal Brief & Motion to Strike Court Reporter’s Record & Fees, filed on
March 9, 2015, is DENIED

. The documentation attached to the motion indicates appellant was billed for the district clerk’s record, which is separate and apart from the court reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5; 34.6. Appellant has not requested, nor been charged, for a court reporter’s record. Because appellant has informed us he will not be requesting a reporter’s record, we consi der the record to be complete, and appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due within 30 days of the date appellant’s brief is filed.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X A cting individually

Date: March 10, 2015
BLM Routes 

Open Yearlong 

Closed Yearlong 

Bureau of Land Managment (BLM) Decommission 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Snowmobile Only 

County / City Government 

Game Retrieval 

Private 

ATV Only 

State Lands 

BLM Routes with Restrictions 

Other Federal Lands 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15 

US Forest Service (USFS) 

Other Routes 

Water 

Public Access Route
 

County Boundary
 Non-BLM Route 

Field Office / TPA Boundary Interstate 

US Highway 

State Highway 

Map shows proposed road management within the Lewis and Clark County NW Travel Planning Area under Alternative D. 

Under this alternative 19.6 miles of road would be Open yearlong, 14.5 miles of road would be Open with a seasonal 

closure from December 2 to May 15, 20.3 miles of road would be Closed yearlong, and 8.8 miles of road would be 

Decommissioned. 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land 

Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through 

digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

Miles 

04 

Map Scale 1:80,000 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS 

Map 17: Lewis & Clark County 

NW Travel Plan Route 

Designations Under Alternative D 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown 

Field Office 

Miles City 

Field Office 

Butte 

Field 

Office Billings
 

Field Office
 

Dillon
 

Field Office
 

Miles 

0 400
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,195.73

 1,195.69

 1,195.61

 1,195.57

 1,195.53

 1,195.50

 1,195.47

 1,195.44

 1,195.41

 1,195.37

 1,195.34

 1,195.30

 1,195.26

 1,195.22

 1,195.17

 1,195.14

 1,195.11

 1,195.06

 1,195.01

 1,194.98

 1,194.94

 1,194.89

 1,194.86

 1,194.84

 1,194.80

 1,194.77

 1,194.74

 1,194.71

 1,194.68

 1,194.65

 44.02

 43.95

 43.82

 43.76

 43.69

 43.64

 43.59

 43.54

 43.49

 43.42

 43.37

 43.31

 43.24

 43.18

 43.09

 43.04

 42.99

 42.91

 42.83

 42.78

 42.71

 42.63

 42.58

 42.55

 42.49

 42.44

 42.39

 42.34

 42.29

 42.24

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.07

-0.13

-0.07

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.07

-0.07

-0.07

-0.08

-0.05

-0.05

-0.08

-0.08

-0.05

-0.07

-0.08

-0.05

-0.03

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

CHANGE

7

-6

-28

5

-2

6

7

7

9

-1

6

-3

-2

-3

-5

6

0

-9

-14

-7

-18

-12

1

13

-7

2

3

2

-1

-1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 15

 10

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 10

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 17

 17

 24

 23

 16

 16

 17

 17

 19

 18

 16

 16

 16

 15

 22

 16

 15

 18

 12

 3

 0

 14

 11

 14

 11

 12

 12

 12

 9

 8

C.F.S.

 .32

 .32

 .45

 .43

 .30

 .30

 .32

 .32

 .35

 .33

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .28

 .41

 .30

 .28

 .34

 .23

 .06

 .00

 .26

 .21

 .27

 .20

 .23

 .22

 .23

 .18

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/02/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.86 -45 440 0 436 8.19 .20

ACRE-FEET -1,860 -89 873 0 865

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 873

 873

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .20

JULY 1, 2004 .20

 44.07
(No. 6962

#### Judicial Inquiry Board, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Finance, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 26, 1973.*

Ray F. Breen, Judicial Inquiry Board, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 457 340 395

2 405 334 375

3 395 335 365

4 407 339 369

5 381 335 362

6 392 330 363

7 411 346 372

8 391 342 364

9 414 348 373

10 433 347 394

11 402 350 377

12 411 344 378

13 431 336 383

14 448 321 392

15 470 330 378

16 394 319 353

17 373 313 341

18 372 323 345

19 379 344 360

20 404 353 376

21 380 323 351

22 378 303 335

23 365 281 315

24 350 282 301

25 315 270 288

26 299 258 272

27 285 253 264

28 298 251 266

29 321 241 269

30 296 236 255

31 285 229 246

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Farrar Park At Dutch Slough 

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 216

 213

 210

 207

 203

 200

 200

 196

 197

 197

 192

 188

 185

 184

 177

 172

 165

 165

 163

 161

 164

 170

 172

 179

 184

 191

 192

 192

 211

 190

 203

 200

 196

 189

 186

 182

 178

 175

 168

 168

 156

 162

 164

 161

 158

 147

 154

 149

 151

 143

 147

 148

 148

 150

 149

 148

 147

 147

 148

 149

 210

 205

 201

 195

 192

 189

 186

 183

 181

 179

 176

 174

 172

 168

 165

 161

 158

 156

 155

 152

 153

 154

 156

 157

 156

 157

 158

 157

 162

 158

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,170

 3,137

 3,102

 3,063

 3,024

 2,985

 2,943

 2,898

 2,852

 2,805

 2,756

 2,707

 2,659

 2,611

 2,566

 2,522

 2,479

 2,440

 2,403

 2,366

 2,333

 2,304

 2,279

 2,257

 2,237

 2,220

 2,206

 2,195

 2,192

 2,189

 226

 224

 222

 219

 216

 213

 210

 207

 204

 200

 197

 193

 190

 187

 183

 180

 177

 174

 172

 169

 167

 165

 163

 161

 160

 159

 158

 157

 157

 156

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Bernice E. Meehan, Respondent, v. James McCloy et al., Appellants.

All concur.
(No. 74-CC-240

#### Vallarta Reporting Service, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Pollution Control Board, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 13, 1974.*

Vallarta Reporting Service, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 24.295 Return of wine to bond. ( a ) *General.* Wine, domestic or imported, which has been taxpaid and removed from bonded wine premises, may be received by the proprietor of a bonded wine premises for return to bond. The proprietor may, when such taxpaid wine is returned to bond, make a claim for refund or credit, without interest. However, tax will not be refunded or credited for any wine for which a claim has been or will be made under 27 CFR part 70, subpart G. If the tax has been determined but not paid, the person liable for the tax may, when such wine is returned to bond, be relieved of the liability. Claims for refund or credit, or relief from tax paid or determined on wine returned to bond, are filed in accordance with § 24.66.
( b ) *Receipt.* The quantity of taxpaid wine returned to bond is determined upon receipt on bonded wine premises. The quantity determined will be entered on the TTB F 5120.17, Report of Bonded Wine Premises Operations for the reporting period during which the wine is returned.
( c ) *Records.* The proprietor shall maintain records covering each lot of taxpaid wine returned to bond in accordance with § 24.312.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1332, as amended, 1382, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5044, 5371))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1513-0053, 1513-0115, and 1513-0030) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31082, July 9, 1991; T.D. ATF-338, 58 FR 19065, Apr. 12, 1993; T.D. ATF-344, 58 FR 40354, July 28, 1993; T.D. ATF-376, 61 FR 31030, June 19, 1996; T.D. TTB-130, 80 FR 55248, Sept. 15, 2015]