alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


 


Electrum Special Acquisition Corporation



700 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor


New York, NY 10065


 


June 10, 2015


  


The Electrum Group LLC


700 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor


New York, NY 10065


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement
that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Electrum Special
Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the
Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration
Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), The Electrum Group
LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the
Company from time to time, situated at 700 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10065 (or any successor location).
In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay The Electrum Group LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing
monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. The Electrum Group LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have
in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse
against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	ELECTRUM SPECIAL 
	 	ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Eric N. Vincent
	 	 	Name:  	Eric N. Vincent
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


Acknowledged and Accepted by:


 


	THE ELECTRUM GROUP LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Andrew M. Shapiro	 
	 	Name: Andrew M. Shapiro	 
	 	Title:  General Counsel
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.145 Encased containers.

Completely denatured alcohol may be packaged by distributors in unlabeled containers which are completely encased in wood, fiberboard, or similar material so that the surface (including the opening) of the actual container is not exposed. When completely denatured spirits are packaged in unlabeled containers, the distributor shall apply the required marks or label to an exposed surface of the case. The case shall be so constructed that the portion containing the marks will be securely attached to the encased container until all of the contents have been removed. A statement reading “Do Not Remove Inner Container Until Emptied,” or words of similar meaning, shall be placed on the portion of the case bearing the marks.
### subpart 1—foreign language assistance
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.03

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.00

 360.03

 360.00

 359.97

 360.00

 359.97

 359.97

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.03

 360.05

 539

 541

 541

 541

 539

 541

 539

 541

 541

 539

 541

 539

 541

 539

 537

 539

 537

 535

 537

 535

 535

 539

 539

 539

 541

 541

 539

 541

 539

 539

 541

STORAGE

-2

+2

+0

+0

-2

+2

-2

+2

+0

-2

+2

-2

+2

-2

-2

+2

-2

-2

+2

-2

+0

+4

+0

+0

+2

+0

-2

+2

-2

+0

+2

CHANGE

 461

 449

 447

 456

 446

 422

 433

 376

 375

 383

 422

 438

 457

 440

 437

 426

 406

 414

 408

 406

 395

 395

 384

 402

 431

 401

 401

 386

 370

 361

 372

 208

 213

 217

 209

 202

 207

 206

 207

 204

 203

 202

 201

 206

 208

 203

 204

 203

 204

 202

 202

 204

 205

 202

 206

 204

 206

 207

 205

 205

 208

 205

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 8, 2010

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 6,368 12,800

ACRE-FEET +0 0 12,631 25,389

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 59,178

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 25,389

 97,198

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,989

 1,966

 1,948

 1,948

 1,883

 1,840

 1,843

 1,748

 1,740

 1,753

 1,786

 1,788

 1,788

 1,815

 1,826

 1,829

 1,820

 1,850

 1,838

 1,829

 1,845

 1,850

 1,850

 1,871

 1,804

 1,783

 1,793

 1,771

 1,758

 1,668

 1,616

 56,436

 111,941

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 12,631

 1,103

 1,103

 1,092

 1,075

 993

 930

 910

 879

 882

 895

 886

 892

 892

 948

 974

 990

 994

 992

 961

 949

 977

 1,001

 1,033

 1,055

 961

 960

 959

 952

 954

 867

 776

 29,835

 59,178

RIVER CANALS
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.284 Adjustment of tax. ( a ) *Adjustment of tax in lieu of refund.* In lieu of filing a claim for refund of tax as provided in § 25.283, a brewer may make an adjustment (without interest) to the excise tax return, Form 5000.24, for the amount of tax paid on beer returned to the brewery, voluntarily destroyed, lost, destroyed, or rendered unmerchantable.
( b ) *Beer returned to brewery other than from which removed.* An adjustment may be made on the excise tax return for the amount of tax paid on beer returned to the brewery under § 25.213. The adjustment will be made on the tax return filed for the brewery to which the beer was returned. The adjustment may not be made prior to the return of beer to the brewery. If the brewer is required to file a notice under § 25.213, the adjustment may not be made until the appropriate TTB officer authorizes disposition of the beer.
( c ) *Beer voluntarily destroyed.* An adjustment may be made on the excise tax return for the amount of tax paid on beer voluntarily destroyed under subpart N of this part. The adjustment will be made on the tax return filed for the brewery from which the beer was removed. The adjustment may not be made prior to the destruction of the beer.
( d ) *Beer lost, destroyed or rendered unmerchantable.* An adjustment may be made on the excise tax return for the amount of tax paid on beer lost, destroyed, or rendered unmerchantable under § 25.282. The adjustment will be made on the tax return filed for the brewery from which the beer was removed. A brewer may not make an adjustment prior to notification required under § 25.282(e). When beer appears to have been lost due to theft, the brewer may not make an adjustment to the tax return until establishing to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the theft occurred before removal from the brewery and occurred without connivance, collusion, fraud, or negligence on the part of the brewer, consignor, consignee, bailee, or carrier, or the employees or agents of any of them.
( e ) *Condition of adjustments.* ( 1 ) All adjustments will be made within 6 months of the return, destruction, loss, or rendering unmerchantable of the beer.
( 2 ) Adjustment of the tax paid will be made without interest.
( 3 ) An adjustment may not be taken if the brewer was indemnified by insurance or otherwise in respect of the tax.
( f ) *Records.* When brewers make adjustments on the excise tax return in lieu of filing a claim, they shall keep the following records; ( 1 ) For beer returned to the brewery or voluntarily destroyed, the records required by §§ 25.283(a)(1), (2), (4), (5), (7), (8), and (10).
( 2 ) For beer lost, destroyed, or rendered unmerchantable, the records required by § 25.283 (a)(1), (2), (5), (b) (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6).
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1335, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5056))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5480, Jan. 19, 2001; T.D. ATF-437a, 66 FR 17809, Apr. 4, 2001]
### §81s. Offenses

In case of a violation of this chapter, or any regulation under this chapter, by the grantee, any officer, agent or employee thereof responsible for or permitting any such violation shall be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000. Each day during which a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 590, §19, 48 Stat. 1003.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.03

 360.00

 360.03

 360.00

 360.00

 359.97

 359.97

 359.97

 360.00

 359.92

 359.94

 359.94

 359.00

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.94

 359.92

 359.92

 359.94

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.89

 359.89

 359.86

 359.89

 539

 537

 539

 537

 537

 535

 535

 535

 537

 531

 533

 533

 467

 531

 531

 531

 531

 533

 531

 531

 533

 531

 531

 531

 531

 531

 531

 529

 529

 527

 529

STORAGE

+2

-2

+2

-2

+0

-2

+0

+0

+2

-6

+2

+0

-66

+64

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

-2

+2

CHANGE

 416

 428

 476

 477

 452

 435

 455

 442

 414

 422

 437

 466

 465

 461

 471

 436

 437

 412

 401

 451

 452

 462

 462

 460

 440

 452

 431

 410

 431

 407

 395

 355

 355

 353

 358

 357

 305

 303

 309

 306

 258

 259

 255

 255

 258

 260

 258

 255

 251

 254

 258

 253

 251

 253

 254

 251

 258

 256

 231

 226

 226

 225

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2013

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8 0 8,506 13,656

ACRE-FEET -8 0 16,872 27,087

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 60,114

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 27,087

 104,073

 537

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,998

 2,018

 2,099

 2,130

 2,148

 2,034

 2,053

 2,026

 2,010

 1,957

 1,933

 1,963

 1,999

 2,045

 2,076

 2,036

 1,999

 1,842

 1,734

 1,746

 1,769

 1,823

 1,851

 1,830

 1,818

 1,878

 1,859

 1,801

 1,767

 1,748

 1,686

 59,676

 118,367

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 16,872

 984

 986

 1,011

 1,036

 1,087

 1,049

 1,051

 1,031

 1,052

 1,047

 1,020

 1,022

 1,035

 1,065

 1,082

 1,079

 1,047

 936

 861

 833

 843

 899

 929

 905

 903

 937

 937

 935

 903

 916

 886

 30,307

 60,114

RIVER CANALS
### §104. Numbering of sections; single proposition

Each section shall be numbered, and shall contain, as nearly as may be, a single proposition of enactment.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 634.)
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Rolando Atkinson

*James F. Bingham,*special public defender, in support of the motion.

Submitted October 16

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by the defendant for bail to the Supreme Court of the State of Connecticut under § 694 of the Connecticut Practice Book and under §§ 54-68f and 54-68g of the Connecticut General Statutes in the appeal from the Superior Court in Pair-field County is denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 816

 874

 961

 924

 879

 852

 856

 846

 869

 890

 906

 894

 845

 909

 916

 942

 915

 912

 960

 1,001

 1,044

 1,036

 1,043

 1,051

 1,086

 1,088

 1,160

 1,110

 1,071

 1,050

 1,031

 631

 637

 670

 679

 676

 579

 633

 644

 613

 639

 652

 651

 675

 672

 710

 720

 734

 747

 749

 748

 760

 788

 799

 784

 806

 827

 838

 873

 847

 834

 848

 680

 703

 748

 768

 748

 721

 713

 702

 697

 718

 728

 732

 731

 754

 760

 777

 788

 784

 799

 821

 852

 864

 870

 874

 900

 901

 948

 984

 951

 911

 919

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

§ 26.174 Records. ( a ) *General.* Every person intending to file claim for drawback on eligible articles brought into the United States from Puerto Rico shall keep permanent records of the data elements required by this section. Such records shall be maintained at the business premises for which the claim is filed and shall be available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer during business hours.
( b ) *Details of records.* Each person intending to claim drawback on eligible articles brought into the United States shall maintain permanent records showing the following data: ( 1 ) The name, description, quantity, and formula number of each such article.
( 2 ) The alcohol content of each such article.
( 3 ) Name and address of the manufacturer and shipper, and date of entry into the United States.
( 4 ) Evidence of taxpayment of distilled spirits in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Evidence of taxpayment of distilled spirits.* All shipments of eligible articles from Puerto Rico to the United States shall be supported by the vendor's commercial invoice which must bear a certification as to taxpayment by the person who determined or paid the tax, and include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of vendor;
( 2 ) The number of the applicable invoice;
( 3 ) The serial or package identification number of the container;
( 4 ) Name, type, and formula number of the product;
( 5 ) The kind of spirits, proof, and proof gallons in the container; and
( 6 ) The serial number of each Form 487-B (5170.7) covering such articles shipped to the United States.
( d ) *Form of record.* No particular form of record is prescribed, but the data required to be shown shall be readily ascertainable from the records kept by the drawback claimant.
( e ) *Retention of records.* Each drawback claimant shall retain for a period of not less than three years all records required by this subpart, all commercial invoices or shipping documents, and all bills of lading received evidencing receipt and tax determination of the spirits. In addition, a copy of each approved formula returned to the manufacturer of eligible articles shall be retained for not less than three years from the date he files his last claim for drawback under the formula. The records, forms, and formulas shall be readily available during regular business hours for examination by appropriate TTB officers.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0494) [T.D. ATF-263, 52 FR 46594, Dec. 9, 1987, as amended by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21669, May 1, 2001]
July 18, 2013 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office 

des transports 

du Canada 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

X40, suite 6402 

400 7th Street S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

Reference: OST 2006-24269 

Canadian 

Transportation 

Agency 

M4820-U5-19 

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United 

States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters 

between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport 

Agreement between Canada and the United States of America, signed March 12, 2007 

(Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the 

Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

Yours sincerely 

Catherine MacDonald 

.~~~~ Manager International Agreements, 

cc Martin Loken, ANA 

Marc Rioux, ACEA. 

Brian Hedberg, US DoT 

Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 

www.cta-otc.gc.ca 

Canada 

Ottawa Ontario K1 A ON9 

www.cta-otc.gc.ca
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,635

 1,831

 2,179

 2,383

 2,231

 2,289

 2,744

 2,782

 2,663

 2,824

 2,511

 2,519

 2,339

 3,142

 1,429

 1,548

 1,557

 1,852

 1,974

 2,027

 1,833

 1,720

 1,610

 1,541

 1,482

 1,326

 1,478

 1,205

 1,253

 1,370

 1,470

 719

 852

 907

 926

 850

 747

 717

 782

 690

 713

 777

 775

 814

 793

 695

 656

 645

 642

 657

 621

 652

 621

 616

 585

 601

 597

 636

 510

 591

 623

 636

 1,097

 1,158

 1,265

 1,338

 1,188

 1,167

 1,304

 1,335

 1,315

 1,358

 1,355

 1,235

 1,286

 1,381

 944

 869

 890

 946

 999

 960

 957

 924

 891

 891

 874

 883

 942

 766

 787

 836

 842

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 19,495

 19,229

 18,999

 18,867

 18,597

 18,325

 18,196

 18,081

 17,962

 17,967

 17,997

 17,775

 17,602

 17,782

 17,629

 17,340

 16,965

 16,573

 16,384

 16,177

 15,830

 15,419

 14,995

 14,528

 14,047

 13,695

 13,351

 12,736

 12,579

 12,546

 12,498

 1,393

 1,374

 1,357

 1,348

 1,328

 1,309

 1,300

 1,292

 1,283

 1,283

 1,286

 1,270

 1,257

 1,270

 1,259

 1,239

 1,212

 1,184

 1,170

 1,156

 1,131

 1,101

 1,071

 1,038

 1,003

 978

 954

 910

 899

 896

 893

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60465 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee

v. KIRKSEY MCCORD NIX, JR. , Defendant

- Appell ant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:15

- CV

- 77

Before BARKSDALE, ELROD, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kirksey McCord Nix, Jr., federal prisoner #20921

- 077, contests the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as time

- barred. T he district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error ; its conclusions of law , de novo

. E.g. , United States v. Redd , 562 F.3d 309, 311 (5th Cir. 2009)

. T he denial of § 2255 relief may be affirmed on any basis supported by the record. Scott v. Johnson , 227 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir. 2000)

.

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R

. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 14, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60465 Document: 00514873895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2019No. 15

- 60465

2 The one - year limitations period appl icable to § 2255 motions runs from the latest of four events including, pertinent here, the date on which the right asserted by movant was recognized by the Supreme Court, “if that right has been newly recognized by the

. . . Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral r eview ” . 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) (3)

. Nix contends his § 2255 motion was timely filed under § 2255(f)(3) because it relies on a new right announced in Rosemond v. United States , 572 U.S. 65 (2014). In United States v. Nix , 694 F. App’x 287, 288 (5th Cir. 201 7), our court found Nix failed to show Rosemond applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. Also, Rosemond addresses the application of the aiding

- and

- abetting statute when the underlying offense includes the requirement that the offense be commi tted during , and in relation to , the predicate offense, that is a combination offense. See United States v. Carbins , 882 F.3d 557, 565 (5th Cir. 2018); United States v. Baker , 912 F.3d 297, 312

– 15 (5th Cir. 2019). Nix’s relevant conviction is for conspir acy to violate the murder

- for

- hire statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1958(a). United States v. Sharpe , 995 F.2d 49 , 50 (5th Cir. 1993) ( Sharpe I ). Rosemond does not apply to the facts of Nix’s case. Se e, e.g., Baker , 912 F.3d at 312

– 315. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-60465 Document: 00514873895 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5



<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,341,000
<SECURITIES>                                    20,037,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,375,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       257,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,473,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,570,000
<PP&E>                                          12,910,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,997,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,648,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,351,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<COMMON>                                           292,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,434,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,648,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,858,000
<CGS>                                            1,629,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,889,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,592,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,313,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,613,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (205,577,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (213,190,000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (7.34)




</TABLE>