alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11


                                SPIRE CORPORTION
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Nine Months Ended Seprtember 30,
                                                                   ------------------------------------
                                                                      1997                      1996
                                                                   ----------                ----------
<S>                                                                <C>                       <C>        
Primary:
--------

Net income (loss)                                                  $1,576,897                $ (711,909)
                                                                   ==========                ==========

Weighted average number common shares outstanding                   3,052,263                 3,031,260

Add: additional common shares issued upon assumed
    exercise of common stock options                                  128,204                        --
                                                                   ----------                ----------

Weighted average common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding                                              3,180,467                 3,031,260
                                                                   ==========                ==========


Primary net income (loss) per share                                $     0.50                $    (0.24)
                                                                   ==========                ==========



Fully Diluted:
--------------

Net income (loss)                                                  $1,576,897                $ (711,909)
                                                                   ==========                ==========

Weighted average number common shares outstanding                   3,052,263                 3,031,260

Add: additional common shares issued upon assuming
    exercise of common stock options                                  222,884                        --
                                                                   ----------                ----------

Weighted average common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding                                              3,275,147                 3,031,260
                                                                   ==========                ==========

Fully diluted net income (loss) per share                          $     0.48                $    (0.24)
                                                                   ==========                ==========
</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**423 CA 13-02101**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF RICKY HART, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ALLYSON B. LEVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered October 29, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Velez v Evans , 101 AD3d 1642).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### §1161aa–1. Postbaccalaureate programs

In addition to any amounts appropriated under part B of subchapter V, there are authorized to be appropriated, and there are appropriated, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $11,500,000 for fiscal year 2009 and for each of the five succeeding fiscal years to carry out part B of subchapter V.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title VIII, §898, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title VIII, §801, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3446.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5567 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5567

    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2020

 Mr. Long (for himself and Mr. Veasey) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal 
    Communications Commission to consider market entry barriers for 
 socially disadvantaged individuals in the communications marketplace 
                  report under section 13 of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Measuring the Economics Driving 
Investments and Access for Diversity Act of 2020'' or the ``MEDIA 
Diversity Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERING MARKET ENTRY BARRIERS FOR SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 13(d) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 163(d)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Considering socially disadvantaged individuals.--In 
        assessing the state of competition under subsection (b)(1) and 
        regulatory barriers under subsection (b)(3), the Commission, 
        with the input of the Office of Communications Business 
        Opportunities of the Commission, shall consider market entry 
        barriers for socially disadvantaged individuals in the 
        communications marketplace in accordance with the national 
        policy under section 257(b).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 609.2 What institutions are eligible to receive a grant under this part? ( a ) An institution or an institution's qualified graduate program listed in paragraph (b) of this section is eligible to receive a grant under this part if the Secretary determines that the institution is making a substantial contribution to legal, medical, dental, veterinary or other graduate education opportunities for Black Americans.
( b ) The institutions and programs referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are— ( 1 ) Morehouse School of Medicine;
( 2 ) Meharry Medical School;
( 3 ) Charles R. Drew Postgraduate Medical School;
( 4 ) Clark Atlanta University;
( 5 ) Tuskegee Institute School of Veterinary Medicine;
( 6 ) Xavier University School of Pharmacy;
( 7 ) Southern University School of Law;
( 8 ) Texas Southern University School of Law and School of Pharmacy;
( 9 ) Florida A&M University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences;
( 10 ) North Carolina Central University School of Law;
( 11 ) Morgan State University's qualified graduate program;
( 12 ) Hampton University's qualified graduate program;
( 13 ) Alabama A&M's qualified graduate program;
( 14 ) North Carolina A&T State University's qualified graduate program;
( 15 ) University of Maryland Eastern Shore's qualified graduate program; and
( 16 ) Jackson State University's qualified graduate program.
( c ) An institution that was awarded a grant prior to October 1, 1992 may continue to receive grant payments, regardless of the eligibility of the graduate institutions described in paragraphs (b)(6) through (16) of this section, until the institution's grant period has expired or September 30, 1993, whichever is later.
( d ) No institution of higher education or university system may receive more than one grant under this section in any fiscal year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063b(e))
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.118-T2 Naphtha. ( a ) *API Gravity at 60 °F.* 30 to 85.
( b ) *Reid Vapor Pressure (PSI).* 8 maximum.
( c ) *Specific Gravity at 20 °C.* 0.70 to 0.80.
( d ) *Distillation ( °F):* ( i ) *I.B.P.* 85 maximum.
( ii ) *10 percent.* 130 maximum.
( iii ) *50 percent.* 250 maximum.
( iv ) *90 percent.* 340 maximum.
( e ) *End point distillation.* 380 maximum.
( f ) *Copper corrosion.* One (1).
( g ) *Sabolt color.* 28 minimum.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59462, Aug. 30, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frieda Martin, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 19.606 Denaturation records. ( a ) *General.* A processor that is authorized to denature spirits must maintain daily records of denaturation showing the following information: ( 1 ) Spirits that are received for, and used in, denaturation;
( 2 ) Spirits, denatured spirits, recovered denatured spirits, spirits residues, and articles that are redistilled in the processing account for denaturation;
( 3 ) Kind and quantity of denaturants received and used in denaturation of spirits or otherwise disposed of;
( 4 ) Conversion of denatured alcohol formulas in accordance with § 19.392;
( 5 ) Denatured spirits produced, received, stored in tanks, filled into containers, removed, or otherwise disposed of;
( 6 ) Recovered denatured spirits or recovered articles received, restored, or redenatured;
( 7 ) Packages of denatured spirits filled, with a separate record for each formula number and filed in numerical order according to the serial number or lot identification number of the packages;
( 8 ) Losses of denatured spirits; and
( 9 ) Disposition of denatured spirits.
( b ) *Record of denaturation.* Each time that a proprietor denatures spirits, the proprietor must prepare a record that shows the formula number, the tank in which denaturation takes place, the proof gallons of the spirits before denaturation, the quantity of each denaturant used (in gallons, or in pounds or ounces), and the wine gallons of denatured spirits produced.
(26 U.S.C. 5207)
#### Thomas Muller, Respondent, v. Pope Hartford Auto Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ.; Putnam, J., not voting.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.213 [Reserved]
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 23.1 

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-18430, 33-18692, 33-18693 and 33-28019) of Golden Books
Family Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries (formerly Western Publishing
Group, Inc and Subsidiaries.) of our report dated March 21, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Golden Books Family
Entertainment, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the period
ended December 28, 1996.

                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 1997

                                      74
Exhibit 15.4
   /s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.GHP
Horwath, P.C.Denver, Colorado
June 28, 2011
#### § 19.327 Packages dumped for mingling.

A proprietor must examine each package of spirits to be dumped for mingling. If any package bears evidence of loss due to theft or unauthorized voluntary destruction, the proprietor must notify the appropriate TTB officer before dumping the package. Mingled spirits must be recorded on the tank record required by §§ 19.592 and 19.593, as appropriate.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 482.80

 482.57

 482.35

 482.55

 482.54

 482.37

 482.22

 482.10

 482.42

 482.82

 483.24

 483.43

 483.72

 484.08

 484.33

 484.59

 484.80

 484.87

 484.93

 485.02

 485.14

 485.21

 485.30

 485.50

 485.77

 486.07

 486.36

 486.70

 486.93

 487.12

 168.7

 168.1

 167.6

 168.1

 168.0

 167.6

 167.2

 166.9

 167.7

 168.7

 169.8

 170.3

 171.0

 171.9

 172.6

 173.2

 173.8

 174.0

 174.1

 174.3

 174.7

 174.8

 175.1

 175.6

 176.3

 177.1

 177.8

 178.7

 179.3

 179.8

STORAGE

-0.6

-0.6

-0.6

+0.5

+0.0

-0.4

-0.4

-0.3

+0.8

+1.0

+1.1

+0.5

+0.7

+0.9

+0.6

+0.7

+0.5

+0.2

+0.2

+0.2

+0.3

+0.2

+0.2

+0.5

+0.7

+0.8

+0.8

+0.9

+0.6

+0.5

CHANGE

189

186

206

736

451

221

163

152

712

803

828

639

851

926

785

795

786

668

680

632

600

548

566

601

648

681

664

735

589

535

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 320

 299

 297

 297

 298

 269

 183

 135

 135

 137

 138

 248

 322

 302

 305

 307

 363

 431

 452

 364

 301

 302

 302

 199

 147

 148

 149

 150

 151

 152

FRIANT-KERN

 10

 2

 11

 14

 2

 7

 9

 7

 9

 4

 5

 7

 8

 12

 14

 12

 12

 7

 10

 12

 3

 15

 7

 1

 10

 6

 4

 8

 6

 1

C.F.S.

 .12

 .03

 .13

 .17

 .02

 .09

 .11

 .09

 .11

 .05

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .14

 .17

 .14

 .15

 .09

 .12

 .14

 .04

 .18

 .08

 .01

 .12

 .07

 .05

 .10

 .07

 .01

INCHES

 .29

 .02

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .52

 .20

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10.5 17,576 0 7,603 0 235 2.85 1.57

ACRE-FEET +10,482 34,862 0 15,081 0 466

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 15,081

 0 23,919

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2008 TO DATE = 1.81

 169.3

 8,838 1.57

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 177

 177

 177

 171

 164

 161

 161

 162

 162

 155

 150

 141

 150

 150

 143

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 135

 130

 130

 130

 130

RIVER

 4,456

 8,838

RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.150 Charges and credits on bond.

The removal of beer concentrate from the brewery without payment of tax under this subpart will constitute a charge against the brewer's bond, Form 5130.22, of an amount equal to the tax which would be due on removal for consumption or sale, including penalties and interest, on all beer used to produce the concentrate which is removed. The satisfactory accounting for concentrate so removed will constitute a credit to the bond.

[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7698, Mar. 5, 1986; 51 FR 9190, Mar. 18, 1986]

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1333, as amended, 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5051, 5053))
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.63 Corporate documents.

Every corporation, before commencing business as a manufacturer of tobacco products, shall furnish with its application for permit, required by § 40.62, a true copy of the corporate charter or a certificate of corporate existence or incorporation executed by the appropriate officer of the State in which incorporated. The corporation shall likewise furnish duly authenticated extracts of the stockholders' meetings, bylaws, or directors' meetings, listing the offices the incumbents of which are authorized to sign documents or otherwise act in behalf of the corporation in matters relating to 26 U.S.C. chapter 52, and regulations issued thereunder. The corporation shall also furnish evidence, in duplicate, of the identity of the officers and directors and each person who holds more than ten percent of the stock of such corporation. Where any of the information required by this section has previously been filed with the appropriate TTB officer and such information is currently complete and accurate, a written statement to that effect, in duplicate, will be sufficient for the purpose of this section.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1421, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5712))

[T.D. 6840, 30 FR 9310, July 27, 1965. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55854, Sept. 28, 1979]
#### NATIONAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., Movant, v. Dorothy E. TANLEY, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 12, 1942.

Bruce and Bullitt, William Marshall, Bullitt, and Donald Q. Taylor for movant.

William J. Goodwin, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment for $250 on insurance policy covering accidental death. Motion for appeal denied and judgment affirmed.
#### Geraldine Senhouse, Respondent, v. May’s Fur & Ready to Wear, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages as a result of defendants’ alleged conspiracy, culminating in the alleged malicious prosecution and false arrest of plaintiff, a verdict was rendered in favor of the individual defendants and against the plaintiff, and in favor of the plaintiff and against the corporate defendant. Defendants appeal from so much of an order as (1) denies the motion of the individual defendants for the recording of the verdict in their favor, (2) denies the corporate defendant’s motion for a direction of a verdict in its favor, and (3) directs a new trial as to all defendants. Order, insofar as *969appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion of the individual defendants for the recording of the verdict in their favor granted, and the complaint as against the corporate defendant dismissed on the law, with costs. There is no proof in the record of want of good faith, misrepresentation, falsified evidence or lack of full and fair disclosure sufficient to overcome the prima facie evidence of probable cause established by plaintiff's conviction in the criminal action. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.41 Application for industrial alcohol user permit. ( a ) *Users.* Each person desiring to withdraw and use tax-free alcohol shall, before commencing business, file an application on Form 5150.22 for, and obtain a permit, Form 5150.9, except permittees who were previously qualified to withdraw and use tax-free alcohol on the effective date of this regulation.
( b ) *Filing.* All applications and necessary supporting documents, as required by this subpart, shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer. All data, written statements, affidavits, and other documents submitted in support of the application are considered a part of the application. ( 1 ) Applications filed as provided in this section, shall be accompanied by evidence establishing the authority of the officer or other person to execute the application.
( 2 ) A State, political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, may specify in the application that it desires a single permit authorizing the withdrawal and use of tax-free alcohol in a number of institutions under its control. In this instance, the application, Form 5150.22, or an attachment, shall clearly show the method of distributing and accounting for the tax-free alcohol to be withdrawn.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For
the month of June 2011
  EKSPORTFINANS ASA
  
   Form 20-F þ
    
    Form 40 F o
  Yes o
    
    No þ




---



##### 



Date: June 15, 2011
    EKSPORTFINANS ASABy:

/s/
KJELL DANIELSENKjell DanielsenAuthorized Signatory




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Table of Capitalization and Indebtedness.
### subpart 2—programs in stem fields

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart 2, consisting of sections 1067g to 1067l, was redesignated subpart 3 of this part by Pub. L. 110–315, title III, §315(a)(1), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3182.
#### Philip Kraushaar, et al., Executors, etc., Respondents, *v.*Henry L. Meyer, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Although a party is not incompetent under section 399.of the old Code to testify to an independent conversation between the deceased and a third person, yet if he participated in the conversation and it related to a transaction between him and the deceased, he is incompetent.

Accordingly, *held,*where in the course of a business transaction between plaintiff's testator and defendant M. the deceased made certain statements to V., who was engaged in drawing up papers between the parties in regard to such transaction, and which statements were in reference to it, that M. was incompetent to testify thereto.

"Where the amount of an extra allowance is by inadvertence slightly in excess of the amount allowed by the Code (sec. 309, old Code), this court will not interfere on appeal; the error should be corrected by motion to correct the judgment.

(Argued January 17,1878;

decided January 29, 1878.)

This was an action to foreclose two mortgages executed "by defendant Moyer to Francis H. Kayser, plaintiff’s testator. The principal questions were disposed of upon the facts.

Upon the trial defendant Meyer testified to certain statements made by the deceased to one Vollmer. Volkner it appeared was at the time engaged in drawing papers between the parties in reference to a business transaction between Meyer and the witness, growing out of the mortgages and the debts they were given to secure ; the statements were made in reference to the transaction. Plaintiff’s counsel moved to strike out the evidence as incompetent under section 399 of the Code. The motion was granted. *Held,*no error ; the court stating the rule as above, citing *Brague*v. *Lord*(67 N. Y., 495).

An extra allowance of $100 was granted ; this was slightly in excess of two and one-half per cent on the amount found due on the mortgages as allowed by section 309 of the Code. *Held,*that the excess was so small it must have arisen from inadvertence and did not require any interference here; that it should have been corrected by motion to correct the judgment.

*603
      *Frank Crooke*for appellant.

*Wm. D. Veeder*for respondents.

Earl, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.