alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 461.05

 460.87

 460.71

 460.49

 460.29

 460.02

 459.61

 459.18

 458.90

 458.67

 458.35

 458.06

 457.68

 457.48

 457.23

 456.83

 456.61

 456.35

 456.04

 455.67

 455.15

 454.74

 454.23

 453.64

 453.13

 452.60

 452.05

 451.42

 450.78

 450.11

 449.47

 922.3

 920.4

 918.6

 916.2

 914.1

 911.1

 906.7

 902.1

 899.1

 896.6

 893.1

 890.0

 886.0

 883.8

 881.2

 876.9

 874.6

 871.8

 868.5

 864.6

 859.1

 854.8

 849.4

 843.2

 837.9

 832.4

 826.7

 820.1

 813.5

 806.7

 800.1

STORAGE

-1.6

-2.0

-1.7

-2.4

-2.2

-2.9

-4.4

-4.6

-3.0

-2.5

-3.4

-3.1

-4.1

-2.1

-2.7

-4.3

-2.3

-2.8

-3.3

-3.9

-5.5

-4.3

-5.4

-6.2

-5.3

-5.5

-5.7

-6.5

-6.6

-6.9

-6.5

CHANGE

2,227

2,062

2,200

1,900

2,062

1,672

1,135

1,368

2,087

2,586

1,793

2,040

1,677

2,517

2,238

1,527

2,441

2,259

1,964

2,147

1,389

1,997

2,095

1,805

1,971

2,126

2,132

1,877

1,795

1,460

1,526

INFLOW

 2,591

 2,584

 2,588

 2,625

 2,676

 2,638

 2,887

 3,275

 3,117

 3,322

 3,010

 3,117

 3,236

 3,127

 3,109

 3,192

 3,144

 3,164

 3,102

 3,642

 3,653

 3,690

 4,322

 4,488

 4,178

 4,502

 4,606

 4,720

 4,672

 4,519

 4,429

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 27

 6

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 345

 350

 358

 353

 355

 354

 352

 317

 378

 382

 370

 369

 366

 354

 363

 347

 356

 361

 358

 359

 375

 363

 358

 353

 321

 288

 297

 299

 306

 278

 296

PUMPING

 116

 115

 130

 126

 126

 158

 129

 118

 114

 128

 146

 124

 124

 113

 113

 138

 120

 127

 165

 119

 133

 122

 118

 80

 159

 117

 110

 133

 116

 126

 98

C.F.S.

 .32

 .32

 .36

 .35

 .35

 .44

 .36

 .33

 .32

 .36

 .41

 .35

 .35

 .32

 .32

 .39

 .34

 .36

 .47

 .34

 .38

 .35

 .34

 .23

 .46

 .34

 .32

 .39

 .34

 .37

 .29

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 28, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -123.7 60,075 107,925 42 0 10,681 3,861 10.97 .00

ACRE-FEET -123,700 119,159 214,069 83 0 21,186 7,658

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 214,069

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 83

 21,186

TOTAL 235,338

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = .00

 924.0

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.30 General. ( a ) *Application.* No person engaged in business as a producer, rectifier, blender, importer, or wholesaler, directly or indirectly or through an affiliate, shall sell or ship or deliver for sale or shipment, or otherwise introduce in interstate or foreign commerce, or receive therein, or remove from customs custody, any wine in containers unless such wine is packaged, and such packages are marked, branded, and labeled in conformity with this subpart. Wine domestically bottled or packed prior to Dec. 15, 1936, and imported wine entered in customs bond in containers prior to that date shall be regarded as being packaged, marked, branded and labeled in accordance with this subpart, if the labels on such wine ( 1 ) bear all the mandatory label information required by § 4.32, even though such information is not set forth in the manner and form as required by § 4.32 and other sections of this title referred to therein, and
( 2 ) bear no statements, designs, or devices which are false or misleading.
( b ) *Alteration of labels.* ( 1 ) It shall be unlawful for any person to alter, mutilate, destroy, obliterate or remove any mark, brand, or label upon wine held for sale in interstate or foreign commerce or after shipment therein, except as authorized by Federal law, or except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section: *Provided,* That the appropriate TTB officer may, upon written application, permit additional labeling or relabeling of wine for purposes of compliance with the requirements of this part or of State law.
( 2 ) No application for permission to relabel wine need be made in any case where there is added to the container, after removal from customs custody or from the premises where bottled or packed, a label identifying the wholesale or retail distributor thereof, and containing no reference whatever to the characteristics of the product. [T.D. 6521, 25 FR 13835, Dec. 29, 1960, as amended by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11891, Mar. 7, 2000; T.D. ATF-953, 68 FR 39455, July 2, 2003]

Cross Reference:
For customs warehouses and control of merchandise therein, see 19 CFR part 19.
#### § 31.151 General requirements as to distilled spirits.

Except as otherwise provided in §§ 31.153 and 31.154, every wholesale dealer in liquors must keep daily records of the physical receipt and disposition of distilled spirits in accordance with §§ 31.155 and 31.156. When required in writing by the appropriate TTB officer, a wholesale dealer in liquors must also prepare and file a monthly summary report totaling the daily receipts and disposition of distilled spirits in accordance with § 31.160.

(26 U.S.C. 5121)
#### Boucher Agency, Inc. *v.*David E. Zimmer et al.

The motion for judgment by default by the plaintiff in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is granted unless the defendants file their brief on or before December 1, 1970.

*573
      *Raphael Korff,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*John J. Hunt,*for the appellees (defendants).

Argued November 3

decided November 3, 1970
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 808

 730

 686

 686

 693

 722

 681

 743

 751

 763

 799

 801

 796

 902

 793

 776

 799

 817

 808

 793

 786

 809

 754

 754

 753

 768

 794

 885

 848

 814

 574

 605

 575

 575

 564

 570

 565

 615

 603

 627

 631

 616

 620

 633

 660

 665

 638

 634

 646

 645

 617

 625

 637

 653

 653

 653

 639

 630

 662

 664

 691

 666

 625

 634

 625

 618

 600

 656

 658

 682

 695

 676

 688

 722

 713

 698

 694

 701

 705

 707

 690

 688

 674

 684

 689

 693

 698

 715

 724

 705

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-4135

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * On remand from the Supreme * Court of the United States. Clint L. Ball, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 14, 2009 Filed: September 14, 2009

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
This case is before us on remand from th e Supreme Court of the United States. See Ball v. United States , 556 U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 2049 (April 27, 2009). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated th is court’s judgment in United States v. Ball , 499 F.3d 890 (8th Cir. 2007), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38 (2007). Having reviewed Clint Ball’s sentence, we conclude the sentence does not run afoul of Gall . However, after our initial ruling inthis case, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Arizona v. Gant , 556 U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (April 21, 2009), which-2- may be relevant to the issues here. Ther efore, without vacating the district court’s judgment, we remand for the district court to analyze the suppression issues in light of Gant , and for a further evidentiary hearing, if the district court deems such a hearing is necessary.

______________________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 582.55

 582.46

 582.76

 581.94

 581.49

 582.67

 582.64

 582.09

 581.87

 581.46

 580.91

 580.89

 580.78

 581.35

 581.33

 580.43

 579.40

 579.58

 576.26

 576.81

 580.14

 581.08

 582.25

 580.26

 579.85

 581.41

 582.06

 581.75

 583.18

 581.00

 579.66

 21,014

 20,961

 21,140

 20,651

 20,387

 21,086

 21,068

 20,740

 20,610

 20,370

 20,048

 20,037

 19,973

 20,305

 20,293

 19,772

 19,187

 19,288

 17,473

 17,766

 19,605

 20,147

 20,835

 19,674

 19,440

 20,340

 20,722

 20,540

 21,392

 20,100

 19,333

STORAGE

-36

-53

+179

-489

-264

+699

-18

-328

-130

-240

-322

-11

-64

+332

-12

-521

-585

+101

-1,815

+293

+1,839

+542

+688

-1,161

-234

+900

+382

-182

+852

-1,292

-767

CHANGE

6,007

5,966

6,166

5,693

5,778

6,285

5,959

5,613

5,843

5,233

6,880

7,059

7,065

13,447

14,226

13,699

13,574

13,684

12,374

13,338

14,325

13,963

14,923

12,094

10,591

10,921

10,858

10,586

11,164

13,074

13,917

INFLOW

 6,024

 5,993

 6,075

 5,940

 5,910

 5,931

 5,968

 5,778

 5,909

 5,353

 7,042

 7,064

 7,096

 13,279

 14,231

 13,961

 13,869

 13,633

 13,289

 13,190

 13,397

 13,643

 14,491

 12,593

 10,622

 10,381

 10,580

 10,593

 10,649

 13,638

 14,219

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 46

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 5, 2011

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,717 310,305 310,341 0 811 19

ACRE-FEET -1,717 615,490 615,561 0 1,609 38

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 615,561

SPILL 0

 21,050

FISH TRAP 1,609

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 10

 481

 1,093

 52

 50

 1,260

 204

 1,051

 460

 300

 72

 211

 585

 1,330

 1,844

 102

 88

 1,572

 360

 1,126

 1,138

 1,270

 1,335

 16,082

 31,899

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 5,164

 5,155

 5,646

 5,018

 5,040

 5,200

 5,120

 4,967

 5,522

 4,955

 5,105

 6,711

 6,904

 11,534

 14,059

 13,013

 13,380

 13,382

 12,591

 13,393

 13,609

 12,419

 12,510

 11,685

 10,140

 8,685

 10,147

 8,632

 8,950

 13,026

 12,502

 284,164

 563,639
§ 19.683 Changes affecting permit applications. ( a ) *General.* If there is a change relating to any of the information contained in, or considered a part of, the application on form TTB F 5110.74, Application and Permit for an Alcohol Fuel Producer Under 26 U.S.C. 5181, the proprietor must amend the information previously submitted within 30 days of the change unless another time period is specified in this subpart.
( b ) *Amended TTB F 5110.74.* Except when a letterhead application or letterhead notice procedure is followed under this subpart, the proprietor must submit an amended application to the appropriate TTB officer on TTB F 5110.74 within 30 days of a change referred to in paragraph (a) of this section if the change affects the terms and conditions of the permit.
( c ) *Letterhead applications.* For the changes specified in §§ 19.685(c), 19.686, and 19.690 of this subpart, the proprietor may submit a letterhead application to the appropriate TTB officer for a change instead of filing an amended TTB F 5110.74. A letterhead application must be on letterhead signed by an authorized representative of the permit holder. The letterhead application must identify the alcohol fuel plant to which the application applies. The letterhead application change is subject to TTB approval. The appropriate TTB officer may, at any time, require that the proprietor submit an amended application on TTB F 5110.74 if administrative difficulties occur as a result of the letterhead application.
( d ) *Letterhead Notices.* For the changes specified in §§ 19.687, 19.695, and 19.691 of this subpart only a letterhead notice to the appropriate TTB officer is required. A letterhead notice must be on letterhead signed by an authorized representative of the permit holder. A letterhead notice does not require approval action by TTB. The appropriate TTB officer may, at any time, require that the proprietor submit an amended application on TTB F 5110.74 if administrative difficulties occur as a result of the letterhead notice.
(26 U.S.C. 5271, 5181)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 157

 160

 167

 173

 179

 177

 179

 177

 167

 165

 170

 171

 167

 172

 172

 178

 177

 189

 201

 203

 209

 215

 225

 241

 252

 266

 280

 297

 315

 319

 329

 144

 153

 157

 161

 164

 164

 165

 160

 158

 158

 158

 154

 155

 159

 158

 161

 162

 159

 164

 169

 171

 175

 179

 184

 185

 197

 214

 226

 239

 239

 241

 152

 158

 160

 165

 169

 171

 171

 167

 163

 163

 164

 163

 162

 165

 166

 169

 169

 170

 179

 187

 190

 195

 202

 212

 220

 232

 248

 262

 275

 274

 275

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 583.49

 582.08

 583.32

 582.36

 582.65

 584.01

 584.15

 581.77

 583.20

 581.34

 581.88

 581.91

 582.53

 582.38

 581.17

 583.77

 583.01

 584.54

 583.48

 583.36

 582.99

 580.89

 583.01

 583.68

 580.37

 582.57

 579.98

 582.37

 584.44

 581.64

 583.87

 21,580

 20,734

 21,477

 20,901

 21,074

 21,896

 21,983

 20,551

 21,404

 20,299

 20,616

 20,633

 21,002

 20,913

 20,200

 21,750

 21,289

 22,223

 21,574

 21,502

 21,277

 20,037

 21,289

 21,696

 19,737

 21,026

 19,513

 20,907

 22,161

 20,475

 21,811

STORAGE

-7

-846

+743

-576

+173

+822

+87

-1,432

+853

-1,105

+317

+17

+369

-89

-713

+1,550

-461

+934

-649

-72

-225

-1,240

+1,252

+407

-1,959

+1,289

-1,513

+1,394

+1,254

-1,686

+1,336

CHANGE

14,951

14,502

21,488

24,850

24,647

26,089

33,685

32,439

30,571

29,329

30,180

29,275

29,601

25,378

24,573

25,817

25,169

25,894

25,106

23,837

24,764

24,534

25,403

22,570

20,768

22,670

21,125

22,587

22,974

21,109

23,019

INFLOW

 14,869

 14,843

 14,612

 14,481

 14,161

 14,132

 14,155

 14,119

 13,987

 14,024

 14,075

 13,812

 13,960

 14,220

 14,056

 14,086

 14,275

 14,290

 14,277

 13,517

 13,969

 14,208

 14,134

 14,491

 14,154

 14,322

 14,228

 14,234

 14,480

 14,285

 14,504

POWER

 0

 0

 6,415

 10,572

 10,312

 11,457

 19,400

 18,956

 16,068

 15,776

 15,860

 15,368

 15,369

 11,117

 10,788

 10,864

 11,040

 11,048

 11,068

 10,269

 10,820

 10,864

 10,552

 7,788

 7,516

 7,612

 7,572

 7,564

 7,776

 7,588

 7,756

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 0

 3

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 25, 2006

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +224 768,904 440,960 325,155 2,635 40

ACRE-FEET +224 1,525,121 874,644 644,945 5,227 79

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 874,644

SPILL 644,945

 21,587

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 4,114

 4,113

 3,726

 3,912

 3,118

 1,993

 2,085

 1,977

 2,009

 1,541

 1,539

 1,343

 1,010

 1,557

 4,086

 4,086

 4,102

 4,096

 4,099

 2,656

 2,150

 2,169

 2,097

 2,116

 2,145

 2,158

 2,158

 2,154

 2,171

 2,158

 2,166

 80,804

 160,275

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 10,104

 9,781

 17,617

 20,663

 20,377

 23,250

 31,256

 30,496

 28,261

 27,727

 28,510

 27,927

 28,512

 23,515

 20,237

 21,270

 20,514

 21,508

 20,849

 22,785

 23,144

 22,730

 23,581

 20,324

 18,575

 20,486

 19,048

 20,438

 20,693

 19,021

 20,556

 683,755

 1,356,228

Table 8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Prince of Wales Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Craig, Alaska, January 26, 2011. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008. 

# DATE: 

The meeting will be held January 26, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESS: 

                        The meeting will be held at the Craig Ranger District, 504 9th Street, Craig, Alaska. Send written comments to Prince of Wales Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 500, Craig, AK 99921, or electronically to Rebecca Sakraida, RAC Coordinator at                         *rsakraida@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Sakraida, RAC Coordinator Craig Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 826-1601.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Jason C. Anderson,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 2011-760 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03955.A4

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mark W. Harding

Mark W. HardingPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerJuly 8, 2011
#### Hargis v. Breathitt County.

Nov. 6, 1942.

A. H. Hargis for appellant.

Roscoe C. Back for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Fulton

— Dismissing purported, appeal.

The above captioned cause was placed on the docket of this Court on July 5, 1940, as a result of the would-be appellant filing with the Clerk a statement of appeal and what purported to be a copy of the judgment of the Breathitt circuit court from which the appeal was attempted. The purported copy of the judgment was not attested or certified by the circuit clerk.

Appearing in the purported record is a motion for an order directing the circuit clerk to copy the record as well as a notice executed on the circuit clerk notifying him that this motion would be made. Also appearing is an affidavit by the would-be appellant stating that although he had filed a schedule in the circuit clerk’s office that official had failed and refused to copy the record. This affidavit contained a prayer that he be permitted to file the purported copy of the judgment and that an order be entered directing the circuit clerk to copy the record and deliver same to this Court.

Appearing in the record is also a purported copy of a petition filed against the circuit clerk in the Breathitt circuit court by Mr. Hargis for a writ of mandamus directing the clerk to copy the record and following this *824a purported copy of the judgment of the Breathitt circuit court granting this writ of mandamus. Then appears a purported copy of the petition in the action in which the adverse judgment was rendered against Mr. Hargis and from which he seeks to appeal.

No purported copy of any judgment, order or pleading is certified by the clerk of the Breathitt circuit court. All copies were apparently made by Mr. Hargis or by someone for him. It is thus seen that no appeal has been perfected in this Court. Section 737 of the Civil Code of . Practice regulating the preparation of transcripts of records to be used in this Court provides that at the close of the transcript the clerk shall certify that it contains a true and complete copy of the record or such parts thereof as he may have been required to copy. Without such certification by the Clerk no purported transcript of the record or portion thereof may be considered by this Court. This being true, it is apparent that no appeal has been perfected. Transcripts of records or portions thereof may not be wheelbarrowed into court but may come in only pursuant to the statutory procedure governing appeals.

It is ordered that the purported appeal be stricken from the docket.