alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of YouthStream MediaNetworks, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period endedDecember 31, 2002as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), Jonathan V. Diamond, as Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company,and RobertWeingarten, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his and her knowledge,respectively, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a)ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in allmaterialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/  Jonathan V. Diamond |
|--------------------------|
| Name:                    | Jonathan  V. Diamond |
| Title:                   | Chairman  & Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                    | February  24, 2002 |
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| /s/ Robert Weingarten    |
| Name:                    | Robert  Weingarten |
| Title:                   | Chief  Financial Officer |
| Date:                    | February  24, 2002 |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,391

 1,401

 1,459

 1,391

 1,377

 1,265

 1,354

 1,437

 1,519

 1,502

 1,421

 1,596

 1,495

 1,439

 1,309

 1,097

 1,046

 956

 1,008

 1,024

 1,050

 1,032

 1,143

 971

 943

 1,029

 1,045

 851

 837

 859

 631

 603

 704

 665

 626

 670

 642

 697

 732

 725

 699

 622

 654

 677

 651

 651

 655

 593

 613

 595

 601

 515

 559

 556

 535

 490

 512

 498

 509

 534

 877

 883

 936

 909

 846

 875

 907

 947

 935

 914

 910

 922

 934

 903

 851

 829

 798

 747

 736

 738

 723

 694

 742

 695

 698

 699

 670

 626

 632

 645

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 10,818

 10,971

 11,205

 11,421

 11,585

 11,760

 11,930

 12,115

 12,298

 12,414

 12,479

 12,527

 12,639

 12,698

 12,672

 12,618

 12,480

 12,318

 12,208

 12,071

 11,887

 11,634

 11,441

 11,222

 11,010

 10,787

 10,523

 10,246

 10,027

 9,843

 773

 784

 800

 816

 828

 840

 852

 865

 878

 887

 891

 895

 903

 907

 905

 901

 891

 880

 872

 862

 849

 831

 817

 802

 786

 771

 752

 732

 716

 703

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01080

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-112365, Form S-8 No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904)pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1990 Employee Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 29, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 28, 2003. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Long Beach, California 

April 21, 2004
#### State of Connecticut *v.*James L. Kelsey State of Connecticut *v.*Michael D. Sullivan

*Leo B. Flaherty, Jr.,*for Donald B. Caldwell.

Argued October 14

decided October 14, 1970

The motion by Donald B. Caldwell for permission to withdraw his appearance in behalf of the defendants in the appeals from the Superior Court in Tolland County is granted.
#### Mabel S. Paolozzi *v.*Peter Schaaf

Alcorn, O. J., House, Cotter, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Argued October 7

decided October 23, 1970

*Edward F. Halloran,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Michael P. KosJcoff,*with whom, on the brief, was *Theodore I. KosJcoff,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*548Pee Cueiam.

The question on this appeal involves issues of fact, and the verdict of the jury was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence.

There is no error.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T00:03:36-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 99.1
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
 lberman@igbir.com
 Aircastle Announces Increase in Quarterly Dividend and Share Repurchase Program




---



##### 



About Aircastle Limited
  www.aircastle.com
 Safe Harbor
### Part A—Adult Education and Literacy Programs

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was, in the original, designated subtitle A of title II of Pub. L. 105–220 and was redesignated part A of this subchapter for purposes of codification, prior to repeal of Pub. L. 105–220 by Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705. This subchapter did not contain a part B, because subtitle B (§251) of title II of Pub. L. 105–220 repealed numerous sections of the Code and was executed to those sections, see Tables.
### §1887. Limitation on imports under section 624 of title 7

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to affect in any way the provisions of section 624 of title 7, or to apply to any import restriction heretofore or hereafter imposed under such section.

(Pub. L. 87–794, title II, §257(h), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 883.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.65

 1,900.75

 1,900.82

 1,900.79

 1,900.67

 1,901.07

 1,900.90

 1,900.98

 1,900.97

 1,901.12

 1,901.60

 1,901.65

 1,901.82

 1,901.78

 1,901.74

 1,901.86

 1,901.81

 1,901.35

 1,901.50

 1,901.87

 1,901.92

 1,901.29

 1,901.27

 1,901.16

 1,901.39

 1,901.54

 1,901.66

 1,901.42

 1,900.89

 1,901.24

 1,901.50

 13,653

 13,727

 13,779

 13,756

 13,668

 13,963

 13,837

 13,896

 13,889

 14,001

 14,360

 14,397

 14,524

 14,494

 14,465

 14,554

 14,517

 14,173

 14,285

 14,562

 14,599

 14,128

 14,113

 14,031

 14,203

 14,315

 14,405

 14,225

 13,830

 14,091

 14,285

STORAGE

+117

+74

+52

-23

-88

+295

-126

+59

-7

+112

+359

+37

+127

-30

-29

+89

-37

-344

+112

+277

+37

-471

-15

-82

+172

+112

+90

-180

-395

+261

+194

CHANGE

1,319

1,295

1,025

987

1,076

977

991

1,032

1,042

1,049

638

478

523

584

593

658

546

367

572

652

680

521

304

261

390

596

584

578

395

724

638

INFLOW

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

POWER

 298

 298

 294

 296

 298

 298

 300

 299

 299

 300

 298

 302

 303

 265

 214

 164

 148

 146

 122

 118

 149

 143

 142

 142

 154

 169

 166

 166

 165

 165

 166

SPILL

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 44

 38

 24

 24

 24

 24

 24

 24

 24

OUTLETS

 5

 4

 1

 7

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 1

 3

 2

 3

 4

 0

 8

 3

 1

 1

 3

 1

 6

 2

 5

 0

 2

 3

 3

 0

 2

C.F.S.

 .25

 .17

 .03

 .34

 .20

 .13

 .13

 .18

 .20

 .17

 .05

 .13

 .10

 .12

 .20

 .00

 .34

 .12

 .06

 .05

 .14

 .06

 .27

 .08

 .23

 .01

 .07

 .13

 .13

 .00

 .09

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 9, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +749 22,075 3,410 1,218 6,787 92 4.18

ACRE-FEET +749 43,786 6,764 2,416 13,462 182

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 6,764

TOTAL RIVER 22,642 42,856

 13,536

 20,214

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 803

 802

 550

 542

 664

 373

 598

 545

 589

 535

 4

 0

 0

 177

 236

 295

 255

 237

 239

 239

 355

 460

 10

 10

 10

 237

 237

 366

 292

 293

 238

 10,191

 20,214

Table 6
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.103 Change in corporate name.

Where there is a change in the name of a corporate export warehouse proprietor the proprietor shall, within 30 days of such change, make application on Form 2098 (5200.16) for an amended permit. The proprietor shall also furnish such documents as may be necessary to establish that the corporate name has been changed.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5712)

[T.D. 6961, 33 FR 9491, June 28, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]
2. 

i * 

(- ., 

- i 

.,. 

zir . Guy Turnd r 

CoIioty.AwJitoT 

Dentoni Texas 

. 

Dear Xii ‘T&nor: 

puestion: 

v+riter that it 13 excluni-w and the only method by which 

typwritcrs may bc purchssed. Upon pursuln~ kxticle 389Qb 

further, we find t!ldt al.1 such.nrticles provided for therein 

Inust bo purc!msad under the provisions of Article lG59, Re- 
‘., 

Ms. Gi$ Turner, January 13, 1939, Pase 2 ' 

. 

i 

,.-., 

vised,Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, 

* 

. Seotion 2 of Arti 3899b provldcs: 

"Suitable of&as and stationery and blanks 

~,' .nsco%sary in the pe?dormance of their duties may 

:in the dtscretion of the Comissicners Court also 

.b.e furnished tQ resident giotrict Judge, resident 

District and County .kttorncye, County Superinten- 

.donts and County Surveyors, end may be paid for. 

ori order of t.hc Comissionera Court out oi’ the 

County Treasury.lT . 

Ih'the absence df statutory authority, you are 

,respeotfullp advised that the oomissioners* court has no 

authority to gurohaso an addin. mchins or typewriter for 

the use of the couuty schoal superintendent and pay for the 

sameout of the general fwdr 

X'ro~ain 

Trustins that the foregoin answers your inquiry, 

.' 

Very truly yours 

. 

hTTOX~:Y GIX?W,L OF T3:XRS 

hPi?ROVED:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 19-3224

MIGUEL ANTONIO MIRAMBEAUX, 

Petitioner

VS.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(A074-948-774)

Present: MCKEE, BIBAS and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

1. Respondent’s Motion to Publish Opinion.

Respectfully,

Clerk/sb

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion to publish opinion is granted

By the Court,

s/Julio M. Fuentes

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 2, 2020

Sb/cc: All Counsel of Record
§ 98.8 Notice of the complaint. ( a ) If the Office receives a complaint that meets the requirements of § 98.7, it provides written notification to the complainant and the recipient or contractor against which the violation has been alleged that the complaint has been received.
( b ) The notice to the recipient or contractor under paragraph (a) of this section must: ( 1 ) Include the substance of the alleged violation; and
( 2 ) Inform the recipient or contractor that the Office will investigate the complaint and that the recipient or contractor may submit a written response to the complaint.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(A)(1), 1232h)
### Division 1—Federal TRIO Programs
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.84

 1,901.04

 1,901.10

 1,901.22

 1,900.96

 1,900.87

 1,901.04

 1,901.05

 1,900.98

 1,901.14

 1,901.00

 1,901.00

 1,900.92

 1,900.80

 1,901.15

 1,901.38

 1,901.33

 1,901.00

 1,900.74

 1,901.07

 1,900.81

 1,901.00

 1,901.23

 1,900.80

 1,900.73

 1,901.09

 1,900.35

 1,901.21

 1,901.51

 1,901.40

 13,793

 13,941

 13,986

 14,076

 13,882

 13,815

 13,941

 13,948

 13,896

 14,016

 13,911

 13,911

 13,852

 13,764

 14,023

 14,195

 14,158

 13,911

 13,720

 13,963

 13,771

 13,911

 14,083

 13,764

 13,712

 13,978

 13,433

 14,068

 14,292

 14,210

STORAGE

-59

+148

+45

+90

-194

-67

+126

+7

-52

+120

-105

+0

-59

-88

+259

+172

-37

-247

-191

+243

-192

+140

+172

-319

-52

+266

-545

+635

+224

-82

CHANGE

2,526

2,628

2,529

2,380

2,000

2,492

2,520

2,593

2,389

2,347

2,404

2,378

2,538

2,785

2,980

3,155

2,930

2,366

2,303

2,577

2,170

2,357

2,347

2,060

2,093

2,433

2,059

2,542

2,023

2,372

INFLOW

 67

 100

 100

 80

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 669

 678

 680

 618

 605

 611

 621

 612

 574

 574

 578

 580

 655

 990

 1,177

 1,194

 978

 714

 601

 557

 540

 488

 479

 430

 415

 402

 359

 356

 311

 324

SPILL

 98

 65

 65

 85

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

OUTLETS

 3

 3

 5

 4

 8

 6

 9

 4

 4

 5

 7

 8

 8

 5

 3

 4

 7

 8

 5

 4

 8

 6

 7

 7

 6

 7

 6

 10

 8

 5

C.F.S.

 .14

 .16

 .24

 .16

 .37

 .26

 .41

 .17

 .17

 .23

 .32

 .36

 .38

 .23

 .15

 .16

 .34

 .35

 .24

 .17

 .36

 .28

 .30

 .30

 .26

 .32

 .30

 .44

 .38

 .24

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +358 73,276 347 4,603 18,370 180 8.19

ACRE-FEET +358 145,343 688 9,130 36,437 357

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 688

TOTAL RIVER 46,255 144,625

 13,852

 98,370

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,719

 1,707

 1,656

 1,548

 1,320

 1,744

 1,661

 1,808

 1,672

 1,543

 1,707

 1,625

 1,740

 1,669

 1,504

 1,705

 1,799

 1,604

 1,628

 1,728

 1,554

 1,627

 1,609

 1,619

 1,533

 1,725

 1,804

 1,691

 1,426

 1,919

 49,594

 98,370
Order entered December 17 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00106

- CR

SUZANNE BATTLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB10

- 50867

- F



### O RDER

On October 28, 2013, this Court adopted a finding that the court reporter has received full

payment for the reporter’s record. We ordered court reporter Charon Evans to file the reporter’s

record within thirty days. To da te, the record has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER Charon Evans, official court reporter of the County Criminal

Court No. 5, to file the reporter’s record by JANUARY 6, 2014 . If the record is not filed by that

date, the Court will order that Charon Evans not sit as a court reporter until the record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Honorable Etta Mullin, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5; Charon Evans, deputyCourt Reporter, County Criminal Court No. 5; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
#### Charles Bartels et al. v. Frederick Sonnenschein et al.

Filed March 3, 1898.

No. 7781

1. Review: Final Order. To obtain a review there must be a final order or judgment on the merits of the action in the court below.

2. ■ — ■——:--. An order overruling a plea in abatement is not a final order.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J.

*Proceeding in error dismissed.*

*Morris, Beekman & Marple, M. McLaughlin,*and *T. M. Erame,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. C. Cowin, J. C. Crawford,*and *E. K. Valentine, contra.*

Norval, J.

This is the second appearance of the cause in this court. On the first submission the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. *(Sonnenschein v. Bartels,*37 Neb. 592.) A rehearing was allowed and a second submission was taken, which resulted in a judgment of reversal, and the cause was remanded to the district court for further proceedings. (41 Neb. 703.) The action was for the conversion of a stock of general merchandise. The answer sets up two defenses, the first being matters in abatement to the suit, and the other relating to tin merits of the controversy. Upon the second trial in the court below the jury returned two verdicts, one in favor *69of the plaintiffs as to the plea in abatement interposed by the defendants, and the other finding for the defend-ants as to the issues joined on the merits. This last verdict was set aside on motion of the plaintiffs, and the defendants’ separate motions for a new trial were overruled, and the judgment was entered that “the defendants and each of them are within the jurisdiction of the court, and that part of the answer filed by the defendants herein, designated and denominated as the first ground of defense, wherein and whereby is pleaded, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed from the case and stricken and eliminated from the answer.” The defendants have prosecuted error proceeding to this court. No final judgment has been entered on the merits in the court below, but the action is there pending and undetermined.

The order above set forth is not one to which error will lie until the final disposition of the case by the district court. Had a genera] demurrer been sustained to the first defense of the answer, or said defense been stricken from the pleading, on motion, the ruling could not be reviewed before final judgment was entered on the merits, and the same is equally true of the order herein assailed. *(School District v. Cooper,*29 Neb. 433; *Welch v. Calhoun, 22*Neb. 166; *Brown v. Edgerton,*14 Neb. 453; *Grimes v. Chamberlain,*27 Neb. 605; *Bartram v. Sherman,*46 Neb. 713; *Lewis v. Barker,*46 Neb. 662; *Hall County v. Smith,*49 Neb. 274.) For want of jurisdiction the petition in error is

Dismissed.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of Ampal-American Israel Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned executive officers of
the Company certifies, to the best of such executive officers knowledge, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Yosef A. Maiman
Yosef A. Maiman Chairman of the Board, President and CEO Ampal-American Israel CorporationAugust 8, 2007 | /s/ Irit Eluz
Irit EluzCFO and Senior Vice President Finance and TreasurerAmpal-American Israel CorporationAugust 8, 2007
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



---

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 477.78

 478.19

 478.08

 477.60

 477.03

 476.26

 475.19

 474.13

 472.80

 471.33

 470.09

 469.02

 467.94

 466.63

 465.34

 464.28

 463.20

 461.89

 460.66

 459.73

 458.54

 457.26

 456.10

 454.81

 453.53

 452.34

 451.48

 450.43

 449.30

 448.36

 447.37

 1,260,178

 1,264,609

 1,263,420

 1,258,234

 1,252,085

 1,243,795

 1,232,292

 1,220,954

 1,206,776

 1,191,166

 1,178,050

 1,166,769

 1,155,418

 1,141,698

 1,128,239

 1,117,219

 1,106,027

 1,092,501

 1,079,850

 1,070,317

 1,058,159

 1,045,133

 1,033,374

 1,020,349

 1,007,479

 995,563

 986,981

 976,536

 965,337

 956,053

 946,309

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,421

 1,208

 4,797

 2,414

 7,395

 4,930

 5,885

 5,870

 4,628

 5,996

 5,853

 5,645

 3,481

 3,922

 5,013

 5,013

 3,654

 4,716

 4,999

 3,696

 4,977

 5,021

 3,792

 3,661

 4,933

 4,957

 3,574

 3,615

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2019 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -312,357 126,066 4,702 -131,807

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 1,512

 4,431

-1,189

-5,186

-6,149

-8,290

-11,503

-11,338

-14,178

-15,610

-13,116

-11,281

-11,351

-13,720

-13,459

-11,020

-11,192

-13,526

-12,651

-9,533

-12,158

-13,026

-11,759

-13,025

-12,870

-11,916

-8,582

-10,445

-11,199

-9,284

-9,744

 298

 364

 372

 243

 132

 140

 142

 121

 251

 336

 313

 128

 101

 109

 117

 78

 110

 96

 103

 84

 100

 99

 104

 97

 107

 94

 88

 31

 43

 122

 179

-834

-634

-2,213

-2,789

-1,349

-4,898

-2,492

-7,310

-5,270

-6,100

-6,219

-4,687

-6,090

-6,326

-5,709

-3,484

-3,685

-5,020

-5,008

-3,687

-5,077

-5,023

-3,564

-4,888

-4,888

-3,774

-3,757

-4,784

-4,915

-3,525

-3,808

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 462,836

 462,202

 459,989

 457,200

 455,851

 450,953

 448,461

 441,151

 435,881

 429,781

 423,562

 418,875

 412,785

 406,459

 400,750

 397,266

 393,581

 388,561

 383,553

 379,866

 374,789

 369,766

 366,202

 361,314

 356,426

 352,652

 348,895

 344,111

 339,196

 335,671

 331,863

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 463,670

0

0

-2,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2,000