alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of Outside Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 
 Description of Outside Director Compensation Program 

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“ACADIA”) has approved the following fees that are payable to the
non-management directors who are members of the Board: 
  

			
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$20,000 per year
	 Additional Retainer for Board Chair
	  	$12,500 per year
	 Additional Retainer for Committee Chairs (other than Scientific Advisory Committee)
	  	$5,000 per year
	 Options
	  	15,000 initial grant upon joining board
		  	10,000 annual grant thereafter

 The Annual Retainer amounts are payable following the first meeting of the Board that follows the annual meeting
of ACADIA’s stockholders. Directors may elect to convert their retainer amounts, in whole or in part, into options with an aggregate exercise price equal to three times the amount elected for conversion. Annual option grants to directors are
made at the Board meeting following the annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the provisions of stock option plans that have been approved by ACADIA’s stockholders. The annual retainer amount and option grant may be pro rated for a
director that joins the Board other than at the first meeting of the Board following the annual meeting of stockholders. 
 In addition, non-management Board
members are paid the following fees for attending meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board: 
 Attendance at Board meetings: 
 $1,000 per scheduled meeting (in person or telephonic) 
 $250 per special telephonic meeting 
 Attendance at committee meetings (other than Scientific Advisory Committee):

 $750 per scheduled meeting (in person or telephonic) 
 $500 per special telephonic meeting 
 Fees for chairs at committee meetings (other than Scientific Advisory Committee):

 $1,500 per scheduled meeting (in person or telephonic) 
 $1,000 per special telephonic meeting 
 Members of the Scientific Advisory Committee receive annual fees of $10,000 per year
and receive an option for 6,000 shares that vests over four years.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.241 Production.

Brewers may produce cereal beverage and remove it without payment of tax from the brewery. The method of production shall insure that the alcohol content of the cereal beverage will not increase while in the original container after removal from the brewery. The brewer shall keep cereal beverage separate from beer, and shall measure the quantity of cereal beverage transferred for packaging in accordance with § 25.41.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5411))
Exhibit 99.1
 HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONTACT INFORMATION:   www.hanmibank.com
 Hanmi Financial Corporation Announces Memorandum of Business Alliance with Woori FinanceHoldings Co. Ltd. (Woori)
and Termination of the Securities Purchase Agreement with Woori
  
    
    mutual efforts to expand the parties international trade finance businesses
    
    mutual efforts to create a correspondent banking relationship for international
remittances
    
    exploring ways to provide services to each others VIP customers
    
    providing mutual support and assistance in benchmarking studies related to best
practices
    
    cooperation and communication in connection with personnel training
    
    sharing of industry and economic information, and information regarding potential
capital investments in Hanmi (when legally permitted)
    
    potential business activities between the companies respective subsidiaries
   About Hanmi Financial Corporation
  Forward-Looking Statements
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.116 Notice of return of spirits withdrawn without payment of tax. If a proprietor of a distilled spirits plant desires to return spirits to his plant as provided in § 28.115, he shall file a notice with the appropriate TTB officer. A copy of the notice shall be prepared for submission to the customs official, as required by § 28.117. The notice shall be executed under the penalties of perjury and shall show: ( a ) Name, address, and plant number of the distilled spirits plant to which the spirits are to be returned.
( b ) Name, address, and plant number of the distilled spirits plant which packaged or bottled the spirits.
( c ) Name, address, and plant number of the distilled spirits plant from which the spirits were withdrawn.
( d ) Name and address of the person who withdrew the spirits.
( e ) Serial number of the TTB Form 5100.11 and the date withdrawn.
( f ) Present location of spirits to be returned.
( g ) Kind of spirits to be returned.
( h ) Number, kind, and serial numbers of the containers to be returned. In case of bottled spirits, the number and size of the bottles in each case.
( i ) Total quantity in proof gallons of spirits to be returned.
( j ) Reason for return of spirits.
( k ) Disposition to be made of returned spirits, i.e., redistillation or return to bonded storage.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended, 1365, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214, 5223))
[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71723, Dec. 11, 1979; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1136, Jan. 4, 2017]
### §6003. Court and grand jury proceedings

(a) In the case of any individual who has been or may be called to testify or provide other information at any proceeding before or ancillary to a court of the United States or a grand jury of the United States, the United States district court for the judicial district in which the proceeding is or may be held shall issue, in accordance with subsection (b) of this section, upon the request of the United States attorney for such district, an order requiring such individual to give testimony or provide other information which he refuses to give or provide on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, such order to become effective as provided in section 6002 of this title.

(b) A United States attorney may, with the approval of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or any designated Assistant Attorney General or Deputy Assistant Attorney General, request an order under subsection (a) of this section when in his judgment—

(1) the testimony or other information from such individual may be necessary to the public interest; and

(2) such individual has refused or is likely to refuse to testify or provide other information on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §201(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 927; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7020(e), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330013(4), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "title" for "part" before period at end.

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–690 inserted ", the Associate Attorney General" after "Deputy Attorney General", and "or Deputy Assistant Attorney General" after "Assistant Attorney General".
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James
F. Parslow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 15, 2005                           By: /s/ James F. Parslow
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     James F. Parslow
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 313 280 296

2 312 268 290

3 318 273 293

4 316 271 291

5 311 255 284

6 312 259 279

7 309 249 274

8 308 248 274

9 301 241 270

10 301 240 264

11 292 244 263

12 299 244 268

13 299 244 272

14 307 200 261

15 304 214 255

16 302 226 259

17 311 237 266

18 319 245 272

19 331 249 277

20 329 249 280

21 338 250 284

22 335 248 282

23 325 239 277

24 326 250 280

25 338 263 295

26 337 264 297

27 336 270 297

28 331 265 293

29 331 260 293

30 320 262 289

31 322 266 289

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
484 P.2d 358

#### Ray Vernon ADKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The STATE of New Mexico, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 575.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 9, 1971.

*517Ted L. Hartley, Garrett & Hartley, Clovis, for petitioner-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent-appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A. 1953, (Repl.Vol. 4, 1970)] was denied after a hearing on the motion. Defendant asserts the trial court erred in finding that at the original trial he (1) was adequately advised of his rights, (2) was adequately represented by counsel, (3) knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, and (4) voluntarily entered his guilty plea.

We affirm.

On appeal we view the evidence most favorable to support the findings. State v. Moser, 80 N.M. 404, 456 P.2d 878 (1969). Findings supported by substantial evidence are conclusive on appeal. State v. Wheeler, 81 N.M. 758, 473 P.2d 372 (Ct.App.1970). The findings of the trial court regarding the Rule 93 motion are sustainable by the record.

Independent of that hearing the record reveals that at the original proceeding prior to accepting the guilty plea, the trial judge solicitously explained to defendant his rights and explored the voluntariness of the plea, to the extent of not accepting a plea of guilty to the second count of the indictment. Further, when defendant stated he did not want an attorney, the trial judge insisted that he consult one. An attorney was provided by the court and he consulted with the defendant. Defendant, after consultation with an attorney, stated he did not.want an attorney. The record of that proceeding is such that a denial of petitioner’s motion without a hearing would have been sustained. Compare State v. King, 82 N.M. 200, 477 P.2d 1015 (Ct.App.1970); State v. Hansen, 79 *N.M. 203, 441*P.2d 500 (Ct.App.1968).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIES S, C. J., and WOOD, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8465]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for International Science & Engineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for International Science and 
Engineering (<greek-i>25104).
    Date/Time: April 25, 2011; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. April 26, 2011; 
8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Stafford II, Room 555, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: OPEN.
    Contact Person: Robert Webber, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-7569.
    If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, 
please contact the individual listed above so your name may be added 
to the building access list.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice on the international 
programs and activities of the National Science Foundation.

Agenda

April 25, 2011

AM: Meet with NSF Director and Committee discussion.
PM: Update on Office of International Science and Engineering, 
Reports from Advisory Committee Working Groups.

April 26, 2011

AM: Globalization of Universities, Member Remarks.

    Dated: April 5, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8465 Filed 4-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
### §81g. Granting of application

If the Board finds that the proposed plans and location are suitable for the accomplishment of the purpose of a foreign trade zone under this chapter, and that the facilities and appurtenances which it is proposed to provide are sufficient it shall make the grant.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 590, §7, 48 Stat. 1000.)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 147 126 137

2 143 129 136

3 149 131 137

4 137 129 134

5 145 129 134

6 150 131 140

7 151 134 141

8 152 134 141

9 152 131 139

10 147 125 135

11 139 121 131

12 147 121 131

13 148 124 135

14 145 121 132

15 141 121 129

16 140 122 130

17 138 122 129

18 137 123 129

19 134 125 128

20 136 126 129

21 139 126 130

22 141 128 133

23 140 129 135

24 141 130 137

25 143 134 139

26 141 135 139

27 143 135 137

28 139 132 135

29 139 126 133

30 137 116 126

31 128 108 119

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Period: May 2023 Run Date: 6/12/2023
### **CHAPTER 27—NATIONAL VOCATIONAL STUDENT LOAN INSURANCE**
#### § 16.2 Territorial extent.

This part applies to the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States.
#### § 24.60 General.

Where the appropriate TTB officer determines by examination of records, inventories, or otherwise that the proprietor has incurred liability for the tax on wine, distilled spirits, or special (occupational) tax, and the proprietor does not pay the tax upon notification of the liability, the tax will be assessed.

(August 16, 1954, Ch. 736, 68A Stat. 767, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6201))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
§ 19.361 Removals by bulk conveyances or pipelines. ( a ) When a proprietor removes spirits from the processing account in bulk conveyances or by pipeline, the proprietor must record the removal on the bottling and packaging record.
( b ) Transfers and withdrawals of bulk spirits from the processing account must be performed in accordance with the provisions of subpart P of this part.
( c ) The consignor of the transfer must forward to the consignee a statement of composition or a copy of any formula under which the spirits were processed for determining the proper use of the spirits, or for the labeling of the finished product.
( d ) Bulk conveyances must be marked as provided in subpart S this part.
(26 U.S.C. 5201)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5562 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5562

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4650 East Rosedale Street in Fort Worth, Texas, as the ``Dionne 
                Phillips Bagsby Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIONNE PHILLIPS BAGSBY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4650 East Rosedale Street in Fort Worth, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dionne Phillips Bagsby Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dionne 
Phillips Bagsby Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5562

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4650 East Rosedale Street in Fort Worth, Texas, as the ``Dionne 
                Phillips Bagsby Post Office Building''.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 360.03

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.00

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.00

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.05

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.00

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 539

 541

 541

 539

 539

 539

 539

 537

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 537

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 541

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 537

 539

 539

 539

 539

STORAGE

-2

+2

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 376

 392

 396

 401

 402

 397

 393

 381

 365

 372

 351

 339

 307

 225

 266

 321

 335

 370

 359

 330

 346

 339

 336

 355

 352

 269

 265

 235

 255

 272

 200

 202

 206

 205

 204

 204

 203

 203

 203

 205

 204

 203

 203

 204

 204

 204

 205

 204

 203

 203

 204

 205

 205

 204

 205

 205

 204

 204

 202

 201

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2010

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2 0 6,111 10,102

ACRE-FEET -2 0 12,121 20,037

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 43,812

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 20,037

 75,970

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,636

 1,643

 1,579

 1,541

 1,555

 1,548

 1,573

 1,568

 1,539

 1,543

 1,500

 1,519

 1,470

 1,383

 1,381

 1,453

 1,502

 1,487

 1,444

 1,400

 1,377

 1,372

 1,348

 1,337

 1,322

 1,226

 1,207

 1,172

 1,190

 1,015

 42,830

 84,953

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 12,121

 789

 798

 768

 746

 781

 791

 800

 791

 779

 778

 768

 801

 812

 795

 757

 759

 799

 760

 749

 756

 728

 716

 691

 665

 678

 667

 652

 642

 630

 442

 22,088

 43,812

RIVER CANALS
VERTX – ADDENDUM TO ADD ALL APPROVED UAS - 1 of 1

3/10/2016

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) 

Dear Sir or Madam:

Vertical Information Services, Inc., (VERTX) has prepared the following addendum to Exemption # 11624 

and 11624A under Docket FAA-2015-0544

This addendum adds any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) 

under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA–2007–3330 at www.regulations.gov, (which is updated 

regularly) when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload.

Allowing the use of any aircraft on the List of Approved Unmanned Systems (UAS) has been used 

recently in exemptions: 

 Exemption No. 15233 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5418

 Exemption No. 15234 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5360

 Exemption No. 15235 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5272

 Exemption No. 15236 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5253

 Exemption No. 15237 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5236

The exemptions listed above are identical in nature to VERTX’s exemption and therefore no new 

precedent would be set by extending the same List to VERTX. 

This addendum makes no other changes to the currently approved exemption 11624 and 11624A, reasons 

for exemption request, and/or operating parameters.

The name and contact information of the applicant remains the same: 

Sincerely,

Eric Andelin 

President 

Vertical Information Services, Inc.

301 W Platt St, Suite 654 

Tampa, FL 33606

Phone: 813.992.6612

Email: eric@vertisx.com
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.2 Territorial extent. ( a ) This part applies to the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia and to denatured spirits and articles coming into the United States from Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
( b ) For the purposes of this part, operations in a foreign-trade zone located in any State of the United States or the District of Columbia are regulated in the same manner as operations in any other part of such State or the District of Columbia.
(48 Stat. 999, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c))
[T.D. ATF-274, 53 FR 25156, July 5, 1988, as amended by T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5477, Feb. 1, 2011]
#### Frank Garibaldi et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Norwalk et al.

*Jules Lang,*in support of the motion.

Submitted December 1

decided December 15, 1970

The motion by the plaintiffs for a review by this court of the trial court’s rectification of the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.