alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 27

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

#### § 27.175 Receipt of distilled spirits by consignee.

Proprietors of distilled spirits plants who receive imported spirits under this subpart shall follow the requirements in 27 CFR part 19 for spirits received by transfer in bond. Proprietors of distilled spirits plants may receive such imported spirits even if they are exempt from bond requirements under § 19.151(d) of this chapter. However, proprietors are not required to file application on TTB Form 5100.16 to receive imported spirits from customs custody.

[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8558, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94207, Dec. 22, 2016; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.132 Toluene. ( a ) *Specific Gravity at 15.56°/15.56 °C.* 0.80 to 0.90.
( b ) *Boiling point ( °C).* 110.6.
( c ) *Distillation range ( °C).* Not more than 1 percent by volume should distill below 109, and not less than 99 percent by volume below 112.
( d ) *Odor.* Characteristic odor.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59463, Aug. 30, 2016]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 582.28

 581.97

 581.58

 582.87

 582.65

 580.62

 582.09

 580.04

 583.34

 584.30

 583.68

 580.27

 583.44

 582.12

 582.76

 581.25

 580.23

 579.25

 579.05

 579.72

 580.10

 580.38

 580.01

 581.83

 581.72

 581.81

 582.21

 583.44

 583.26

 582.55

 584.13

 20,853

 20,668

 20,440

 21,205

 21,074

 19,881

 20,740

 19,547

 21,489

 22,075

 21,696

 19,680

 21,550

 20,758

 21,140

 20,247

 19,656

 19,103

 18,990

 19,367

 19,582

 19,743

 19,530

 20,586

 20,522

 20,575

 20,811

 21,550

 21,441

 21,014

 21,970

STORAGE

-299

-185

-228

+765

-131

-1,193

+859

-1,193

+1,942

+586

-379

-2,016

+1,870

-792

+382

-893

-591

-553

-113

+377

+215

+161

-213

+1,056

-64

+53

+236

+739

-109

-427

+956

CHANGE

29,428

29,142

29,672

27,754

24,948

20,523

18,432

15,460

14,825

12,040

10,015

8,740

13,480

13,890

14,608

13,904

13,983

13,837

14,062

14,331

14,322

14,346

14,121

13,294

12,674

13,559

13,663

13,820

13,440

12,935

12,616

INFLOW

 14,288

 13,953

 13,981

 13,932

 14,127

 14,368

 14,403

 14,503

 13,760

 11,692

 10,156

 9,703

 12,484

 14,235

 14,359

 14,300

 14,225

 14,061

 14,062

 14,087

 14,159

 14,209

 14,173

 12,706

 12,651

 13,480

 13,488

 13,390

 13,440

 13,095

 12,080

POWER

 15,288

 15,280

 15,804

 13,434

 10,887

 6,753

 3,596

 1,529

 35

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 26

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

FISHTRAP

 3

 2

 2

 2

 0

 3

 0

 3

 1

 3

 0

 3

 3

 4

 6

 4

 6

 5

 7

 4

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 2

 6

 7

 5

 5

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 20, 2003

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +818 501,864 417,550 82,606 1,176 117

ACRE-FEET +818 995,447 828,210 163,849 2,333 232

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 828,210

SPILL 163,849

 21,152

FISH TRAP 2,333

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 239

 278

 251

 248

 1,259

 1,976

 1,980

 2,408

 2,318

 2,287

 2,091

 2,041

 1,997

 1,855

 2,343

 2,725

 1,890

 1,746

 1,925

 2,091

 1,977

 2,012

 2,334

 2,334

 2,312

 2,135

 2,374

 2,127

 2,088

 1,884

 2,045

 57,570

 114,190

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 28,644

 28,698

 29,330

 27,531

 23,810

 19,032

 17,092

 13,554

 12,674

 9,677

 7,795

 6,790

 11,352

 11,916

 12,451

 11,469

 12,618

 12,620

 12,729

 12,713

 12,634

 12,750

 12,208

 11,055

 10,554

 11,732

 11,679

 11,933

 11,596

 11,225

 10,629

 450,490

 893,547

Table 8
AMERICAN 

LUNG 

ASSOCIATION. IN GREATER CHICAGO 

Carbon Pollution Standards 

Testimony of Wanda Martin-Terry, MS , MltA, ML6 

Local Leadership Board, American Lung Association in Greater Chicago 

May 24,2012 

Chicago, Illinois 

Good morning, my name is Wanda Martin-Terry, and as a Chicago resident I'm very concerned 

about air pollution and its effect on lung health. 

last year, I became a member of the local leadership Board of the American lung Association in 

Greater Chicago due to my passion for educating the community on an illness that once consumed my 

father. 

Over 30 years ago, my father passed away from lung cancer. To provide for our family, he 

worked as a janitor at a company in Chicago that produced chemicals for oven cleaners and floor wax. 

Every day, he would breathe in these chemicals and in {in se te) he was diagnosed with lung cancer. 

I watched my father's illness debilitate him so much so that he was unable to give me away at my 

wedding. My father's passing forever changed my life and gave me a voice to spread the word and ensure 

there's awareness about lung disease and how it can be prevented. 

Today, I am here to testify in strong support of the EPA' s proposed rule limiting carbon pollution 

from power plants. 

The public should not have to breathe in air pollution. In 2009, your agency determined that 

greenhouse gas pollution threatens Americans' health and welfare by leading to long lasting changes in 

our climate that can have a range of negative effects on human health and the environment {EPA.gov). 

We need to protect our children and grandchildren, and by setting these standards for future power 

plants it will save lives and reduce disease. 

I've heard some members of Congress are proposing changes to the Clean Air Act that could 

dismantle progress made in the last 40 years. Our nation must keep that law strong to continue to protect 

public health. 

Today, we implore EPA to move ahead and finalize this rule on or before the court ordered 

deadline of June 25. Each day of delay harms health and shortens lives. Thank you. 

Contact information: 

Wanda Martin-Terry 

Email: wjmj23@aol.com 

Phone: 630.335.1358
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofYour Domain.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Amendment to the Intrexon Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan 

The first paragraph of Section 6.02 of the Intrexon Corporation 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan is amended to read as follows: 

“6.02 Aggregate Limit 
 The maximum
aggregate number (the “Maximum Aggregate Number”) of shares of Common Stock which may be subject to Awards under this Plan is 13,000,000 shares of Common Stock.”
### §339. Restriction on consular certificates

No consular officer of the United States shall grant a certificate for merchandise shipped from countries adjacent to the United States, which have passed a consulate after purchase for shipment.

(R.S. §2861.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2861 derived from act Feb. 22, 1873, ch. 184, §3, 17 Stat. 474.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,477

 3,683

 1,642

 1,238

 1,120

 887

 824

 857

 891

 829

 773

 728

 693

 674

 626

 619

 622

 605

 589

 606

 546

 534

 540

 501

 513

 508

 488

 473

 477

 453

 433

 1,227

 1,253

 1,101

 569

 625

 613

 594

 610

 593

 545

 596

 589

 573

 579

 545

 526

 523

 509

 487

 491

 452

 465

 442

 424

 413

 409

 411

 402

 385

 379

 366

 1,851

 2,038

 1,305

 955

 875

 773

 697

 681

 702

 691

 669

 646

 623

 630

 583

 568

 564

 551

 533

 545

 503

 493

 475

 454

 445

 443

 438

 431

 420

 403

 387

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 29,558

 29,599

 28,865

 27,788

 26,468

 25,135

 23,988

 21,910

 20,216

 18,883

 17,610

 16,182

 14,398

 13,136

 11,868

 10,398

 9,657

 9,253

 8,911

 8,683

 8,489

 8,301

 8,074

 7,837

 7,613

 7,410

 7,225

 7,026

 6,863

 6,698

 6,521

 2,111

 2,114

 2,062

 1,985

 1,891

 1,795

 1,713

 1,565

 1,444

 1,349

 1,258

 1,156

 1,028

 938

 848

 743

 690

 661

 637

 620

 606

 593

 577

 560

 544

 529

 516

 502

 490

 478

 466

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §916j. Allocation of responsibility for administration and enforcement

#### (a) Administration and general enforcement

The Secretary of Commerce is authorized and directed to administer and enforce all of the provisions of this subchapter and regulations issued pursuant thereto and all of the provisions of the convention and of the regulations of the Commission, except to the extent otherwise provided for in this subchapter, in the convention, or in the regulations of the Commission. In carrying out such functions he is authorized to adopt such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the convention, the regulations of the Commission, this subchapter, and with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to cooperate with the duly authorized officials of the government of any party to the convention.

#### (b) Enforcement relating to whaling vessels

Enforcement activities under the provisions of this subchapter relating to vessels engaged in whaling and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States primarily shall be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Treasury in cooperation with the Secretary of Commerce.

#### (c) Enforcement by officers and employees of coastal States

The Secretary of Commerce may authorize officers and employees of the coastal States of the United States to enforce the provisions of the convention, or of the regulations of the Commission, or of this subchapter, or of the regulations of the Secretary of Commerce. When so authorized such officers and employees may function as Federal law-enforcement officers for the purposes of this subchapter.

(Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 653, §12, 64 Stat. 425; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 916 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Roger G. Little, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:     November 16, 2009           By:   /s/ Roger G. Little
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Roger G. Little
                                           Chairman of the Board Chief Executive
                                           Officer and President


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 3.14
 Adopted December 17, 2002
 BY-LAWS
OF
COLUMBIA OLYMPIA MANAGEMENT, INC.
 ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 SHAREHOLDERS




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 DIRECTORS
   2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
      5




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  6




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 CERTIFICATES FOR SHARES AND THEIR TRANSFER
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DIVIDENDS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  8
##### 



Exhibit 32.0
 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Steven M. SkowSteven M. Skow, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Suzanne LongSuzanne Long, Senior VP & C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 668.239 Reporting requirements. ( a ) An institution must submit reports, in accordance with deadlines established and published by the Secretary in the Federal Register.
( b ) The institution reports such information as the Secretary requires, in compliance with procedures the Secretary describes.
( c ) The institution reports information about transfer and release dates of confined or incarcerated individuals, as required by the Secretary, through an agreement with the oversight entity.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.66 Strengthening bonds.

In all cases where the penal sum of any bond becomes insufficient, the principal shall either give a strengthening bond with the same surety to attain a sufficient penal sum, or give a new bond to cover the entire liability. Strengthening bonds will not be approved where any notation is made thereon which is intended, or which may be construed, as a release of any former bond, or as limiting the amount of any bond to less than its full penal sum. Strengthening bonds shall show the current date of execution and the effective date.

(72 Stat. 1352, 1394; 26 U.S.C. 5175, 5551)
#### Bedle *vs.*Wardell and wife.

In a suit to foreclose a usurious mortgage, the mortgagor is not entitled to a deduction of all the interest paid on the whole principal sum of the mortgage, hut only of the interest on the excess of such principal sum over the amount actually loaned.

On final hearing on bill, answer, and proofs.

*Mr. Beekman*and *Mr.*Murphy, for complainant.

*Mr. 11. Allen, Jr.,*for defendant, S. Warded.

The Chaxgellok.

This suit is brought to foreclose a mortgage made by the defendants, Samuel Wardell and wife, in favor of the complainant, on certain land in Monmouth county, for $1000, payable in one year from its date, (August 2d, 1871,) with *350lawful interest. The interest on the mortgage was paid up to the 2d of August, 1873. The suit was commenced on the 1st of July, 1874. The mortgagor alleges in his answer, that in pursuance of an agreement made between him and the mortgagee, on the loan of the money, he allowed to the latter $100, as premium for the loan, and accordingly received only $900 for the mortgage. The receipt of this premium under that agreement, is admitted by the complainant in his testimony. The mortgagor insists that the complainant is entitled to a decree for only S760, the amount of the money actually lent, less the interest paid on the mortgage. The supplement of April 12th, 1864, to the act against usury, declares that in all cases of suits at law or in equity to enforce any note, bill, bond, mortgage, contract, covenant, conveyance, or assurance, which shall be thereafter made for the payment or delivery of any money, wares, merchandise, goods, or chattels lent, and on which a higher rate of interest shall be reserved than was or is allowed by the law of the place where the contract is made, or is to be performed, the amount or value actually lent, without interest or costs of suit, may be recovered, and no more; and if any premium or illegal interest shall have been paid to the lender, the sum or sums so paid shall be deducted from the amount that may be due as aforesaid, and recovery had for the balance only. The complainant then can only recover, in this suit, the amount actually lent, which is $900, less the illegal interest which he has received, which is $7. The act does not direct a deduction of all interest which has been received on the loan, but all illegal interest only. The complainant has received interest for one year on $1000, whereas, he lent only $900. He has therefore received, illegally, interest for one year, $7, on $100. Deducting the premium and illegal interest from the amount of the mortgage, there remains due to the complainant the sum of $893, for which, without interest or costs, he is entitled to a decree.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7456
RICARDO A. RENTERIA-PIEDRAHITA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, WV;FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States; U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-98) Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrathita, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrahita appeals from a district court order denying his petition for mandamus relief. We affirm. Renteria-Piedrahita petitioned the district court to grant him mandamus relief in the form of an order to the Attorney General to begin deportation proceedings as directed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i) (1988). The district court found no private right of action and no standing to seek mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (1988). The district court was correct. Amendment to immigration laws in 1994forbids a construction of § 1252(i) that allows any private individual to force action to begin deportation proceedings. Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-416, § 225, 108 Stat. 4305; see also Campos v. INS , 62 F.3d 311, 314 (9th Cir. 1995) (overruling prior Ninth Circuit cases); Hernandez-Avalos , 50 F.3d 842, 844 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 64 U.S.L.W. 3241 (U.S. 1995). Therefore, we affirm the district court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    West Indies, Virgin Passage and Sonda de    Vieques 
 
SuDocs Number: C 55.418/7:25650/
Item    Number: [if !vml]>[endif]>0191-B-13    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000865388
 
 
 
11-1991(PDF)
11-1991(Jpg)
4-1990(PDF)
4-1990 (Jpg)
3-1985(PDF)
3-1985(Jpg)
11-1983(PDF)
11-1983(jpg)
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 21, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §2010. Expenditures and audit of Trust Fund

#### (a) Authorization of funding

The Secretary is authorized to pay to the Foundation from the interest and earnings of the fund such sums as the Board determines are necessary and appropriate to enable the Foundation to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Access to books, records, etc., by Government Accountability Office

The activities of the Foundation under this chapter may be audited by the Government Accountability Office under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. The representatives of the Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, and files and all other papers, things, or property belonging to or in use by the Foundation, pertaining to such activities and necessary to facilitate the audit.

(Pub. L. 93–642, §11, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2279; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in two places.