alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### subpart 4—leveraging educational assistance partnership program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 105–244, title IV, §407(a)(1), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1666, amended heading generally.

Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §402(a)(1), (2), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 482, redesignated former subpart 3 as 4 and repealed former subpart 4, comprising sections 1070d to 1070d–1d, which authorized special programs for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
#### Westchester and Bronx Realty and Development Company v. Benjamin M. Whitlock and Others, as Executors, etc.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.299 Execution under penalties of perjury.

When a return, form, or other document is required by this part or in the instruction on or with the return, form, or other document to be executed under the penalties of perjury, as defined in § 25.11, it will be so executed and will be signed by the brewer or other duly authorized person.

(Act of August 16, 1954, 68A Stat. 749, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6065))
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.261 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 580.41

 581.15

 582.70

 582.96

 583.84

 584.53

 583.65

 584.01

 585.90

 584.83

 582.82

 581.22

 581.10

 579.14

 580.74

 585.13

 585.26

 585.18

 583.90

 584.11

 582.71

 584.08

 583.61

 582.98

 583.86

 582.37

 581.52

 583.01

 582.34

 580.70

 579.71

 19,760

 20,188

 21,104

 21,259

 21,793

 22,217

 21,678

 21,896

 23,072

 22,402

 21,176

 20,229

 20,159

 19,041

 19,950

 22,589

 22,670

 22,620

 21,829

 21,958

 21,110

 21,939

 21,653

 21,271

 21,805

 20,907

 20,405

 21,289

 20,889

 19,927

 19,361

STORAGE

+196

+428

+916

+155

+534

+424

-539

+218

+1,176

-670

-1,226

-947

-70

-1,118

+909

+2,639

+81

-50

-791

+129

-848

+829

-286

-382

+534

-898

-502

+884

-400

-962

-566

CHANGE

3,949

3,667

3,837

3,386

3,596

3,524

3,035

3,307

3,784

2,729

4,105

3,701

3,875

3,299

4,313

4,385

3,103

3,256

3,159

3,533

2,878

3,491

2,982

2,875

3,294

2,588

2,788

3,489

2,838

2,532

2,707

INFLOW

 3,849

 3,450

 3,375

 3,308

 3,326

 3,310

 3,306

 3,196

 3,190

 3,066

 4,723

 3,883

 3,909

 3,862

 3,854

 3,054

 3,062

 3,281

 3,558

 3,467

 3,305

 3,072

 3,106

 2,987

 2,944

 2,960

 2,958

 2,962

 2,960

 2,936

 2,911

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 295

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 19

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

FISHTRAP

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2015

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -203 104,005 103,130 295 659 24

ACRE-FEET -203 206,294 204,558 585 1,307 48

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 204,558

SPILL 585

 19,564

FISH TRAP 1,307

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 218

 15

 1,016

 18

 14

 746

 665

 228

 727

 1,586

 699

 1,981

 1,536

 2,067

 2,132

 1,723

 28

 1,849

 1,374

 1,254

 299

 572

 805

 1,938

 2,143

 770

 1,321

 2,069

 685

 17

 14

 30,509

 60,515

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 3,566

 3,348

 2,346

 3,089

 3,132

 2,135

 1,989

 2,685

 2,767

 763

 296

 710

 1,719

 765

 1,510

 1,887

 2,167

 712

 214

 1,252

 1,780

 2,119

 1,739

 531

 833

 1,638

 1,345

 1,384

 2,135

 2,568

 2,705

 55,829

 110,737
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear by T.D. ATF-438, 66 FR 5481, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 30.43 Packaged spirits.

When the quantity of spirits (including denatured spirits when gauged by weight) in packages, such as barrels, drums, and similar portable containers, is to be determined by gauge of the individual packages, such quantity shall, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, be determined by weighing each package on an accurate weighing beam or platform scale having a beam or dial showing weight in pounds and half pounds, where packages having a capacity in excess of 10 wine gallons are to be gauged, or in pounds and ounces, or pounds and hundredths of a pound, where packages designed to hold 10 wine gallons or less are to be gauged. In either case the tare must be determined and subtracted from the gross weight to obtain the net weight. From the proof and weight ascertained, the quantity of the spirits in proof gallons shall be determined by reference to Table 2, 3, or 4. However, if the spirits contain solids in excess of 600 milligrams per 100 milliliters, the proof gallons shall be determined as prescribed for such spirits in § 30.41. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section or of § 30.44, (a) gross weights and tares of packages being filled need not be taken in any case where the gauge of the spirits is not derived from such weights under the gauging procedure being utilized, and (b) meters, other devices, or other methods may be used for determining the quantity of spirits in individual packages, when such meter is used as provided in 27 CFR part 19, or, when such other device or method has been approved by the appropriate TTB officer.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended, 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204, 5211))

[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8535, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37004, July 16, 1996]
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5665 

For the relief of Maria Rose Versace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2020 

Mr. BRINDISI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Maria Rose Versace. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MEDICARE PART D LATE EN4 ROLLMENT PENALTY FOR MARIA ROSE 

5 VERSACE; COMPENSATION FOR PAST PEN6 ALTIES. 

7 (a) ELIMINATION OF PENALTY.—With respect to 

8 each month beginning on or after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act, no increase in the monthly beneficiary 

10 premium established under subsection (a) of section 

11 1860D–13 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5665 IH

1 113) shall be made under subsection (b) of such section 

2 for Maria Rose Versace. 

3 (b) COMPENSATION FOR PAST PENALTIES.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

6 of Health and Human Services shall pay to Maria 

7 Rose Versace an amount equal to the sum of each 

8 increase described in subsection (a) made under sec9 tion 1860D–13(b) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1395w–113(b)) applicable to Maria Rose 

11 Versace for months beginning prior to the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

13 (2) APPROPRIATION.—There are appropriated 

14 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services such 

15 sums as may be necessary to make the payment de16 scribed in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 584.22

 585.01

 583.85

 584.76

 585.16

 585.28

 585.40

 585.27

 584.59

 584.35

 584.86

 585.78

 584.20

 585.54

 584.90

 585.48

 585.05

 585.09

 585.20

 584.98

 583.98

 585.43

 584.79

 585.90

 585.32

 585.65

 584.86

 585.69

 585.65

 582.14

 22,026

 22,513

 21,799

 22,359

 22,607

 22,683

 22,758

 22,677

 22,254

 22,106

 22,421

 22,997

 22,013

 22,846

 22,445

 22,808

 22,538

 22,564

 22,633

 22,495

 21,878

 22,777

 22,377

 23,072

 22,708

 22,915

 22,421

 22,940

 22,915

 20,770

STORAGE

+282

+487

-714

+560

+248

+76

+75

-81

-423

-148

+315

+576

-984

+833

-401

+363

-270

+26

+69

-138

-617

+899

-400

+695

-364

+207

-494

+519

-25

-2,145

CHANGE

10,213

10,297

9,693

10,352

10,239

10,174

10,119

10,021

9,851

9,968

10,636

11,272

10,567

11,418

10,808

11,204

12,233

12,981

13,026

12,923

12,696

13,434

13,081

13,326

12,814

13,040

12,664

13,069

12,815

11,887

INFLOW

 9,982

 9,961

 9,961

 9,980

 10,023

 10,046

 9,990

 9,971

 9,972

 9,950

 10,386

 10,889

 10,970

 10,907

 10,917

 10,929

 12,277

 12,874

 12,899

 12,900

 12,652

 12,895

 13,192

 12,885

 12,908

 12,845

 12,821

 12,716

 12,736

 12,876

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 264

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 4

 5

 7

 5

 6

 5

 6

 6

 7

 8

 6

 8

 8

 6

 8

 7

 7

 9

 7

 8

 6

 1

 6

 6

 5

 6

 7

 6

 7

 7

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 8, 2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -974 346,821 344,310 264 2,550 190

ACRE-FEET -974 687,919 682,939 524 5,058 377

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 682,939

SPILL 524

 21,744

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 83

 83

 543

 527

 448

 482

 456

 454

 498

 555

 565

 1,028

 1,032

 1,021

 1,033

 1,099

 1,240

 1,339

 1,226

 1,206

 1,200

 660

 1,281

 1,256

 1,235

 1,247

 1,243

 1,260

 1,191

 1,355

 26,846

 53,249

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 9,822

 10,050

 8,810

 9,520

 9,165

 9,096

 8,791

 8,974

 9,001

 9,438

 9,983

 10,084

 9,356

 10,204

 9,605

 9,937

 10,837

 11,393

 11,589

 11,556

 11,353

 12,627

 11,727

 11,943

 11,311

 11,513

 11,199

 11,587

 11,402

 10,377

 312,250

 619,348

Table 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,447

 1,203

 1,161

 1,084

 943

 809

 414

 487

 523

 653

 774

 1,055

 1,220

 1,490

 1,927

 2,567

 2,032

 1,735

 1,375

 1,097

 909

 686

 850

 693

 652

 863

 1,366

 1,085

 1,777

 1,504

 232

 223

 241

 238

 250

 219

 212

 205

 206

 209

 201

 199

 204

 240

 243

 280

 238

 262

 272

 236

 210

 205

 204

 193

 173

 190

 172

 175

 177

 186

 557

 528

 527

 521

 458

 390

 274

 264

 259

 267

 298

 327

 367

 442

 561

 681

 616

 560

 620

 442

 311

 292

 299

 268

 254

 314

 377

 425

 483

 438

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,974

 5,133

 5,304

 5,473

 5,659

 5,828

 5,858

 5,877

 5,881

 5,870

 5,862

 5,759

 5,599

 5,479

 5,483

 5,636

 5,725

 5,764

 5,926

 5,978

 6,015

 6,043

 6,083

 6,084

 6,040

 6,027

 6,037

 6,020

 5,942

 5,699

 355

 367

 379

 391

 404

 416

 418

 420

 420

 419

 419

 411

 400

 391

 392

 403

 409

 412

 423

 427

 430

 432

 435

 435

 431

 431

 431

 430

 424

 407

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 585.56

 585.37

 585.17

 584.51

 584.09

 584.14

 585.22

 585.15

 586.45

 580.69

 579.55

 581.73

 583.79

 584.52

 585.36

 585.82

 584.57

 584.76

 585.16

 585.67

 584.96

 585.39

 584.79

 583.49

 581.76

 583.01

 583.03

 583.02

 583.59

 584.13

 584.06

 22,859

 22,739

 22,614

 22,205

 21,946

 21,976

 22,645

 22,601

 23,422

 19,921

 19,271

 20,528

 21,763

 22,211

 22,733

 23,022

 22,242

 22,359

 22,607

 22,928

 22,482

 22,752

 22,377

 21,580

 20,545

 21,289

 21,301

 21,295

 21,641

 21,970

 21,927

STORAGE

+314

-120

-125

-409

-259

+30

+669

-44

+821

-3,501

-650

+1,257

+1,235

+448

+522

+289

-780

+117

+248

+321

-446

+270

-375

-797

-1,035

+744

+12

-6

+346

+329

-43

CHANGE

7,598

7,451

7,401

6,831

6,890

7,002

7,300

6,901

6,815

4,650

5,942

6,847

6,875

6,779

6,807

6,689

5,702

6,181

6,349

6,220

5,846

6,206

5,689

5,570

5,446

6,291

5,869

5,834

6,008

5,820

5,647

INFLOW

 7,438

 7,508

 7,460

 7,033

 7,018

 6,985

 6,960

 6,919

 6,398

 6,412

 6,270

 6,213

 6,250

 6,551

 6,543

 6,542

 6,094

 6,121

 6,223

 6,058

 6,070

 6,066

 5,875

 5,969

 5,966

 5,914

 5,859

 5,835

 5,833

 5,653

 5,667

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 2

 3

 4

 4

 3

 2

 3

 4

 3

 3

 0

 0

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 4

 3

 3

 2

 2

 4

 2

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -618 197,456 197,703 0 0 65

ACRE-FEET -618 391,654 392,144 0 0 129

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 392,144

SPILL 0

 22,545

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 908

 904

 897

 812

 804

 829

 821

 811

 805

 907

 1,180

 1,680

 912

 780

 807

 849

 813

 836

 842

 879

 920

 878

 856

 880

 824

 863

 884

 793

 830

 818

 827

 27,449

 54,445

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,591

 6,446

 6,424

 5,990

 6,169

 6,204

 6,459

 6,094

 6,081

 3,990

 5,055

 4,988

 5,490

 5,504

 5,630

 5,521

 4,518

 4,774

 4,840

 4,884

 4,489

 4,904

 4,478

 4,368

 4,296

 5,071

 4,615

 4,728

 4,946

 4,682

 4,444

 162,673

 322,662

Table 8
No. 21380.

#### Lewis Arakadie *v.*The People of the State of Colorado.

(398 P.2d 977)

Decided February 8, 1965.

Rehearing denied February 23, 1965.

Plaintiff in error, pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, George H. Sibley, Special Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice McWilliams

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Arakadie pled guilty to the charge of conspiracy to commit robbery as defined in C.R.S. ’53, 40-7-36 and was thereafter sentenced to a term of from six to ten years *322in the State Penitentiary. By writ of error Arakadie now seeks review of this judgment and sentence.

Rule 37(d) Colo. R. Crim. P. states that “[n]o writ of error on behalf of the defendant shall lie to a judgment based upon a plea of guilty . . . .” and hence this writ of error must be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
(No. 77-CC-1636

#### Stephan A. Johnson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 28, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession *249of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 583.05

 583.95

 583.69

 583.27

 582.87

 583.00

 582.94

 582.03

 580.42

 581.80

 582.66

 582.98

 584.21

 583.78

 583.10

 582.42

 583.31

 584.95

 583.39

 582.10

 582.25

 583.20

 583.44

 583.83

 582.45

 582.98

 583.07

 582.18

 583.81

 584.02

 21,313

 21,860

 21,702

 21,447

 21,205

 21,283

 21,247

 20,704

 19,766

 20,569

 21,080

 21,271

 22,020

 21,756

 21,344

 20,937

 21,471

 22,476

 21,520

 20,746

 20,835

 21,404

 21,550

 21,787

 20,955

 21,271

 21,325

 20,793

 21,775

 21,902

STORAGE

+744

+547

-158

-255

-242

+78

-36

-543

-938

+803

+511

+191

+749

-264

-412

-407

+534

+1,005

-956

-774

+89

+569

+146

+237

-832

+316

+54

-532

+982

+127

CHANGE

5,623

5,424

4,699

4,830

4,825

5,114

5,104

6,276

7,757

8,908

8,763

8,486

8,768

8,439

8,256

8,197

8,695

8,933

8,051

8,128

8,644

9,291

8,982

9,063

8,522

9,060

9,055

8,760

11,456

11,069

INFLOW

 5,158

 5,059

 4,689

 4,870

 4,859

 4,985

 5,034

 6,460

 8,144

 6,498

 8,415

 8,302

 8,302

 8,485

 8,378

 8,316

 8,336

 8,340

 8,448

 8,432

 8,428

 8,915

 8,820

 8,854

 8,853

 8,812

 8,940

 8,940

 10,872

 10,915

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,917

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 81

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 5

 4

 5

 4

 3

 5

 3

 5

 1

 3

 5

 3

 3

 2

 1

 1

 5

 1

 0

 1

 5

 4

 3

 5

 3

 4

 3

 3

 4

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,333 237,178 231,859 1,998 2,550 99

ACRE-FEET +1,333 470,443 459,892 3,963 5,058 196

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 459,892

SPILL 3,963

 20,569

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 3,215

 3,573

 3,368

 2,495

 3,469

 2,929

 2,450

 3,451

 260

 260

 270

 253

 644

 262

 245

 248

 3,835

 4,291

 4,183

 1,363

 1,270

 1,474

 1,480

 1,235

 634

 955

 3,580

 2,823

 3,703

 3,444

 61,662

 122,307

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 3,162

 2,227

 1,955

 2,860

 1,456

 2,481

 3,099

 3,217

 7,517

 8,575

 8,608

 8,170

 8,692

 8,033

 7,832

 7,687

 4,323

 4,233

 3,826

 6,519

 7,064

 7,652

 7,474

 7,685

 7,858

 8,032

 5,471

 6,763

 7,628

 7,283

 177,382

 351,837

Table 8
#### Petronia Paltanowicz, Appellant, v. Herman Mendlowitz, Respondent.

— Motion granted and order modified. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
#### Isabel R. Spiller v. William H. Grosscup.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00108-CV

__________________

DENNIS HOCKABOUT AND TRACI HOCKABOUT, Appellants

V.

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 23-04-05066-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Dennis Hockabout and Traci Hockabout, Appellants, filed an unopposed 

motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellants filed the 

motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 8, 2024

Opinion Delivered May 9, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
§ 76.126 What regulations apply to the consolidated grant applications for insular areas? The following regulations apply to those programs included in a consolidated grant: ( a ) The regulations in §§ 76.125 through 76.137; and
( b ) The regulations that apply to each specific program included in a consolidated grant for which funds are used.
(Authority: 48 U.S.C. 1469a)
[47 FR 17421, Apr. 22, 1982]
#### Barkin Construction Company, Appellant, v. Henry G. Hershfield and Others, Respondents.

Order modified by requiring defendants to pay all costs of action to date to be taxed, and that the amendment shall be without prejudice to the position of the case on the calendar, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss,-JJ.
! " #$%&

"  '()''(*+)


,% "

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) "

"

		- -./$% "

		"

"


%00- "

"

 " 	1
/. '()2''22)


"

		 		! "

"

0% "

333333333333333333333333333333333333"

	
	


	


45	%#6%%/6,0%#7%6,'*-*2'(-7$
%008

9%0%1007%:7.6%-7$
%0086%-%#$$%00%-

01-./7%#;#.,#;-%%#0

%#%
%0086%#,-%#6#,1	-%#

	$'<-*2'=-:7.6%0%#07%1/7%7%- !*2'=)<*<2-0

0
%00-/ .-.%%#0%-	%	 1-

)/#.,$77%%''   >?*<@"@+" 

%3333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333


	 -	


	
:

%/A%333333333333333333

	5

'

Nov 12 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

November 12, 2019

Case 19-01100-BFK Doc 14 Filed 11/12/19 Entered 11/12/19 15:37:59 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
BB :

33333333333333333333333333333

 :@
CD??=*"


:!;-
!

<(22:6%;-7%**2

0-.**2<2


#@&2<"=D?)D'22

@&2<"=D?)D'*?

AEF$E; /6

Counsel for Plaintiffs

SEEN AND :

________________________________

Antoine A. Kayal, pro se

?*(5.#.

%1-	**D<2

Defendant

*

Case 19-01100-BFK Doc 14 Filed 11/12/19 Entered 11/12/19 15:37:59 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2