alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 497

 494

 497

 503

 508

 508

 509

 507

 505

 504

 494

 490

 495

 501

 499

 492

 481

 477

 467

 482

 476

 473

 458

 452

 444

 438

 439

 440

 439

 430

 443

 456

 460

 465

 477

 453

 476

 474

 475

 477

 470

 471

 471

 467

 468

 466

 460

 459

 450

 451

 428

 437

 403

 402

 397

 408

 397

 406

 410

 412

 402

 397

 475

 483

 486

 487

 484

 490

 487

 487

 488

 486

 481

 477

 477

 481

 477

 473

 468

 461

 458

 455

 454

 439

 426

 422

 420

 417

 419

 422

 421

 415

 413

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
02/16/201011:09 AM

From:

To:

Cc:

Archive:

Cathy,

{In Archive} RE: Part 2 Fees evaluation

Butt. Neal T. to: Catherine Penland

C . "Tavarez, Isreal L ft , ftNieto. Margaret~. "Ziegler, Ken R.... -Duran,

c. Angela -, ~Rocha, Dario W.-

"Butt, Neal T." <NButt@cabq.gov>

Catherine PenlandlR6IUSEPAlUS@EPA

"Tavarez. Isreal L." <ITavarez@cabq.gov>, ~Nieto. Margaret" <mnieto@cabq.gav>. "Ziegler.

Ken R.ft <kr.z:iegler@cabq.gov>. ftDuran, Angela ft <aduran@cabq.gav>. ftRocha. Dario W.ft

<DRacha@cabq.gov>

This message is being viewed in an archive.

your are correct, this is a typo. Please change citation to read "Major source shall have the

meaning defined In 40 CFR 70.2". I will request an administrative change from the NM

State Records Center.

Thanks,

Neal

"Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the

blacker and denser it is. At all counts, it forms an unconscious snag, thwarting our most

well-meant intentions."

- Dr. Carl G. Jung

From: Penland.Catherine@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Penland,Catherine@epamail.epa.gov]

sent: Friday, February 12, 20106:03 AM

To: Butt, Neal T.

Subject: Part 2 Fees evaluation

Neal,

Still trying to tie up the TSD on the Pt. 2 Fees eva!. far the 2 SIP submissions so far. Ran across

something in definitions meant to ask you about and got sidetracked on other things. With respect to the

defintion of a major source, your definition references 40 CFR 71.2. That would be 40 CFR Part 71.2 - the

Title V program on Tribal and Federal lands. Why did you reference that Part, which does not apply to

state programs? Did you mean to reference 40 CFR Part 70.2? If so. a simple e-mail comment on typo.

with intent to correct will suffice. If not, I need an explanation. If you did mean to reference Pt. 71, and

you will be providing an explanation, hold off, as I may need other items. as I try to finish the TSD. Hope

to do this today. so should have any additional itemsJquestions to you by COB today. Also. is there

anyone else I need to cc on these requests? I noticed that Isreal had included a number of other folks in

the monthly call, and at home today working, so not sure of your new structure· may have included your

management.

Thanks,
Cathy

Catherine G. Penland

EPA Region 6 - 6PD·R

Phone: (214) 665-7122

Fax: (214) 665-6762

penland.catherine@epa.gov
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

A01 RBP Minor Modification Ambient Air Quality Impacts Report 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A02 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (English) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A03 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (Spanish) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A04 RBP Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

Proposed Prevention of Signification Deterioration Documents

REGION 9

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso (RBP) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

B01 Technical Support Document Facts 7-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B02 Rio Bravo Poso Contact Information 18-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B03 US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Discussion 8-Dec-11 Damian Higgins, USFWS Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

E-mail Communications Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

C01 Minor Modification Request 17-May-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C02 Site Specific Modification Questions 12-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C03 Baseline Actual Calculations 27-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C04 Trial Burn Extension Request 22-Jul-11 Maynard Adams, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C05 Greenhouse Gas Calculations 12-Oct-11 Eric Moller, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C06 Trial Burn Report 7-Nov-11 Catherine Castillo, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C07 Application Completeness Determination 24-Feb-11 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, Rio Bravo Poso

Correspondence Material Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 136

 136

 138

 139

 141

 143

 147

 148

 150

 152

 154

 154

 157

 161

 162

 157

 159

 162

 163

 163

 166

 172

 174

 172

 171

 171

 174

 178

 177

 179

 180

 124

 123

 125

 126

 127

 128

 132

 133

 132

 133

 137

 139

 140

 144

 146

 142

 141

 144

 147

 150

 151

 157

 157

 155

 154

 155

 157

 160

 159

 159

 160

 129

 129

 131

 132

 133

 135

 138

 138

 139

 141

 144

 144

 147

 151

 152

 149

 150

 153

 155

 156

 159

 163

 165

 163

 162

 163

 165

 168

 168

 167

 169

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### Part B—Language Institutes
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8398]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 25, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Kristine H. Cleary, Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin, as an individual; 
trustee of the 2008 Family Irrevocable Trust KHC (``KHC Trust''); and 
custodian of three minor children to acquire control of First 
Bancorporation, Inc. (``First BC'') and thereby indirectly acquire 
control of State Bank Financial (``Bank''), both of La Crosse, 
Wisconsin. Sandra G. Cleary, La Crosse, Wisconsin, as an individual; 
trustee of the 2008 Family Irrevocable Trust SGC (``SGC Trust''); and 
custodian of two minor children to acquire control of First BC and 
thereby indirectly acquire control of Bank. In addition, KHC Trust and 
SGC Trust, both of La Crosse, Wisconsin, and five minor children to 
acquire and retain shares of First BC and thereby join the Cleary 
Family Group, which controls First BC.
    2. Riki Rae Davidson, Devin Scott, Kayla Scott, Shad Scott, and 
Shann Scott, all of Billings, Montana, individually; First Interstate 
Bank as trustee of three separate Scott family trusts; Sandra Suzor as 
Voting Agent of five separate Scott family trusts; Susan Baker as 
Voting Agent of one Scott family trust and as co-trustee of one Scott 
family trust; Homer Rollins Scott as Voting Agent of two separate Scott 
family trusts; and Charles Heyneman as Voting Agent of two separate 
Scott family trusts, all of Billings, Montana, for approval to join the 
Scott Family Group, which controls 25 percent or more of First 
Interstate BancSystem, Inc., Billings, Montana, and thereby indirectly 
controls First Interstate Bank, Billings, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-8398 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

#### § 4.6 Wines covered by this part.

The regulations in this part apply to wine containing not less than 7 percent and not more than 24 percent alcohol by volume.

[T.D. TTB-158, 85 FR 18721, Apr. 2, 2020]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 14151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04915]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 347]

Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary 
for Consular Affairs and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa 
Services of the Authority To Make Findings of Extraordinary 
Circumstance for Aliens Who Remain in the United States Beyond Their 
Authorized Periods

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
for Consular Affairs and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa 
Services, to the extent authorized by law, the authority under 
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 222(g)(2)(B), 8 U.S.C. 
1202(g)(2)(B), to make findings that extraordinary circumstances exist, 
relative to circumstances that may be confronted by one or more aliens, 
to ensure that the alien would not be denied admission by operation of 
section 222(g) on a subsequent application for admission, when they 
remained in the United States beyond their authorized period of stay.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, 
and the Under Secretary for Management may at any time exercise any 
authority or function delegated by this delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 29, 2013.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04915 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
```
#### § 31.21 Basis of regulation.

Persons engaging in or carrying on the business or occupation of selling or offering for sale alcoholic liquors fit for use as a beverage, or any alcoholic liquors sold for use as a beverage, are subject to the provisions of this part. The classes of liquor dealer business and the conditions under which the provisions of this part apply to them are specified in §§ 31.31 through 31.34.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.177 Encased containers. ( a ) A dealer may package specially denatured spirits in unlabeled containers which are completely encased in wood, fiberboard, or similar material. The total surface (including the opening) of the actual container of the spirits must be enclosed.
( b ) When specially denatured spirits are packaged in unlabeled containers, the dealer shall apply the required marks to an exposed surface of the case. The case shall be constructed so that the portion bearing the marks will remain securely attached to the encased container until all the spirits have been removed. A statement reading “Do not remove inner container until emptied,” or of similar meaning, shall be placed on the portion of the case bearing the marks.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1360, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5206))
[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended at T.D. ATF-476, 67 FR 17939, Apr. 12, 2002]
### SUBCHAPTER IX—STAR SCHOOLS PROGRAM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10805 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR OSPINA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-26-1-G

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Ospina has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ospina has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is not developed sufficiently to reach Ospina’s ineffective assistance claims raised in his separate, pro se notice of appeal. United States v. Navejar , 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992). Ospina may raise this issue in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 99-10805 -2- excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
## Status of State Plans for Hospital Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators

Update: 3

/ 1 8 /1 3

This document does not establish any new requirements and is not binding or enforceable. It does not constitute final agency action under Clean Air Act section

307(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1).



### EPA

Region State/Local

Agency Status

TBD Draft State

Plan

Submitted Final

State Plan

Submitted State Plan

Approved Negative

Declaration

Submitted or

Approved Anticipated

States to

Submit

Negative

Declarations Anticipated States

to Accept

D elegation of

Federal Plan

Region

1 Connecticut X

Maine X

Massachusetts X

New

Hampshire X

Rhode Island X

Vermont X

Region

2 New Jersey X

New York X

Puerto Rico X

Virgin Islands X

Region

3 District of

Columbia X

Delaware X

Maryland X

Pennsylvania

Philadelphia

County

Allegheny

County X X

X

Virginia X

West Virginia X

Region

4 Alabama DEM

Huntsville

Jefferson

County

(Birmingham) X X

X

### EPA

Region State/Local

Agency Status

TBD Draft State

Plan

Submitted Final

State Plan

Submitted State Plan

Approved Negative

Declaration

Submitted or

Approved Anticipated

States to

Submit

Negative

Declarations Anticipated States

to Accept

D elegation of

Federal Plan

Florida X

Georgia X

Kentucky DNR

Jefferson

County

(Louisville) X

X

Mississippi X

North Carolina

DNR

Forsyth County

, NC

(Winston

Salem)

Mecklenburg

County , NC

(Charlotte)

Buncombe

County, NC

(Asheville) X X

X

X

South Carolina X

Tennessee X

Region

5 Illinois X

Indiana X

Michigan X

Minnesota X

Ohio X

Wisconsin X

Arkansas X

### EPA

Region State/Local

Agency Status

TBD Draft State

Plan

Submitted Final

State Plan

Submitted State Plan

Approved Negative

Declaration

Submitted or

Approved Anticipated

States to

Submit

Negative

Declarations Anticipated States

to Accept

D elegation of

Federal Plan

Region

6 Louisiana X

New Mexico

City of

Albuquerque X

X

Oklahoma X

Texas X

Region

7 Iowa X

Kansas X

Missouri X

Nebraska X

Region

8 Colorado X

Montana X

North Dakota X

South Dakota X

Utah X

Wyoming X

Region

9 Arizona DEQ X

Maricopa

County

, AZ X

Pima County,

AZ X

Pinal County,

AZ X

California X

Hawaii X

Nevada DEP X

American

Samoa X

Guam X

Region

10 Alaska X

Idaho X

Oregon X

Washington X
§ 19.484 Marks on packages filled in production or storage. ( a ) *Packages filled in production or storage.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, a proprietor must mark packages of spirits filled in production or storage with: ( 1 ) The name of the producer, or the producer's trade name, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) The distilled spirits plant number of the producer, such as “DSP-KY-708”;
( 3 ) The kind of spirits or, in the case of distillates removed under § 19.307, the kind of distillate such as “Grape Distillate” or “Peach Distillate”;
( 4 ) The package identification number;
( 5 ) “BSA” or “OC” when spirits are treated with caramel (burnt sugar) or oak chips, as the case may be;
( 6 ) The rated capacity of the package in gallons shown as “RC-G”; and
( 7 ) The name or trade name and the plant number of the packaging proprietor in place of the name or trade name and plant number of the producer if packages of spirits of 190° or more of proof are filled by a proprietor other than the producer.
( b ) *Real or trade names.* The producer's or other proprietor's real name, or the authorized trade name used in accordance with § 19.94 at the time of production, may be placed on any package filled at the time of the production gauge, or at the time of the original packaging of the spirits in wood when, as provided in § 19.305, the spirits were not filled into wooden packages at the time of production gauge. When spirits have been mingled in accordance with § 19.326, the proprietor may use only a producer name associated with any portion of the mingled spirits on packages filled with such mingled spirits.
(26 U.S.C. 5206)
### §3502. Admissibility in evidence of eye witness testimony

The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title II, §701(a), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 211.)
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number0-13465

 

 

NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIPREALTY FUND I

 (Exact name ofregistrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act).  Yes [ ] No [X]
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.113 Amending the dealer registration.

Every brewer registered as a dealer under this subpart must maintain a current and accurate Brewer's Notice, TTB Form 5130.10. Whenever there is a change to any of the information provided in the approved Brewer's Notice, the brewer must amend the notice within the time period specified in subpart G of this part. An amendment to the Brewer's Notice, Form 5130.10, will also serve as an amendment of the brewer's dealer registration under this subpart. The brewer's dealer registration will also terminate when brewery operations under the Brewer's Notice terminate.

(26 U.S.C. 5124)
#### Hyman Rossman, Respondent, v. Hensle Construction Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented.