alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 464

 453

 451

 446

 438

 436

 406

 401

 403

 398

 396

 396

 397

 393

 392

 397

 399

 392

 389

 386

 381

 383

 378

 373

 366

 366

 358

 355

 407

 387

 393

 394

 388

 381

 376

 359

 356

 360

 369

 374

 368

 366

 370

 352

 362

 364

 357

 356

 361

 352

 310

 341

 346

 341

 340

 315

 443

 430

 423

 415

 409

 402

 393

 387

 383

 380

 381

 383

 388

 382

 380

 379

 380

 377

 373

 370

 369

 367

 364

 359

 356

 352

 346

 337

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:43:42-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Albert J. Roy *v.*Leo J. Mulcahy, Commissioner of State Police, et al.

*John Rose, Jr.,*in support of the motion.

*Stephen I. Trcmb,*in opposition.

Submitted March 12

decided March 17, 1971

The motion by Lionel R. LaBreche et al. for a review of the action of the Superior Court in New Haven County denying their motion to intervene as codefendants is denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.98 Inspection and regauge.

The proprietor shall inspect all containers to be withdrawn pursuant to TTB Form 5100.11 and shall regauge all packages, except those which are to be withdrawn on the filling or production gauge as authorized in 27 CFR part 19. If the withdrawal is to be made subject to regauge, the proprietor shall prepare a package gauge record as provided in 27 CFR part 19, enter the total proof gallons regauged on TTB Form 5100.11, and attach a copy of the package gauge record to each copy of TTB Form 5100.11. If a proprietor wishes to reduce the proof of spirits contained in packages to be withdrawn pursuant to TTB Form 5100.11, he shall make such proof reduction incident to regauge of the packages.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1412-0190 and 1512-0250)

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5204))

[T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8559, Mar. 1, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004]
!" #$#$"


%& '(&)

************************************************************************

+	
	


,-&-.. 	/0123% !"4 $ "


0

			

./&

**************************************************************************

	5

	














 !


"







 "













"





#	$	$" %"
!


&




"'( 


"

)*+,",,,-"




#	$	$





&
.

( 





&

*/,,
"

Case 19-01121-BFK Doc 9 Filed 04/10/20 Entered 04/10/20 09:59:02 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
 

.



+/

 







+/"0,0,.

11111111111111111111111111111

%2.3



4

%
'


53 2#	 6

77	.%




	.%


)8%9::;+,-

	.%


"<

+,:0=($


"80,+,>




6)?,:-:=+!>0??

2

6)?,:-::?!,;;+

	%@


 .


<


77.


.
)8%900,:,-

<
A
"((<

;,B:;C(


(

"80,+?/




6 )?,:-?:?!??>?

2

6 )?,:-;:>!0B/>

6 
@

!
.


<
$


111177'( 


11111111

'( 




Apr 9 2020 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: April 10, 2020

Case 19-01121-BFK Doc 9 Filed 04/10/20 Entered 04/10/20 09:59:02 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
	











#




"








77











#
.

.
)8%900,:,-

<
A
"((<

;,B:;C(


(

"80,+?/




6 )?,:-?:?!??>?

2

6 )?,:-;:>!0B/>

6 
@

!
.


<
$


D$

	.%


)8%9::;+,-

	.%


"<

+,:0=($


"80,+,>




6)?,:-:=+!>0??

2

6)?,:-::?!,;;+

	%@


 .


<


Case 19-01121-BFK Doc 9 Filed 04/10/20 Entered 04/10/20 09:59:02 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 339

 338

 366

 376

 443

 450

 490

 482

 430

 443

 476

 486

 486

 480

 473

 447

 493

 461

 438

 484

 486

 501

 526

 482

 460

 429

 432

 436

 264

 266

 269

 276

 287

 300

 309

 314

 314

 320

 324

 327

 329

 337

 339

 345

 347

 349

 351

 343

 342

 340

 348

 341

 335

 328

 326

 321

 287

 295

 299

 304

 328

 345

 365

 369

 354

 356

 364

 376

 383

 383

 385

 383

 392

 381

 376

 383

 388

 392

 404

 377

 367

 359

 358

 358

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,566

 3,638

 3,711

 3,787

 3,879

 3,984

 4,105

 4,227

 4,323

 4,415

 4,504

 4,602

 4,707

 4,808

 4,906

 4,994

 5,087

 5,164

 5,212

 5,250

 5,273

 5,296

 5,346

 5,367

 5,370

 5,353

 5,328

 5,303

 255

 260

 265

 271

 277

 285

 293

 302

 309

 315

 322

 329

 336

 343

 350

 357

 363

 369

 372

 375

 377

 378

 382

 383

 384

 382

 381

 379

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.22

 1,900.86

 1,900.78

 1,900.78

 1,900.91

 1,901.03

 1,901.03

 1,901.01

 1,901.00

 1,900.89

 1,900.88

 1,900.83

 1,900.75

 1,901.34

 1,901.18

 1,900.82

 1,901.00

 1,901.36

 1,901.14

 1,901.42

 1,901.25

 1,901.08

 1,901.51

 1,901.63

 1,901.32

 1,901.35

 1,901.38

 1,901.28

 1,901.28

 1,901.33

 1,901.33

 14,076

 13,808

 13,749

 13,749

 13,845

 13,933

 13,933

 13,918

 13,911

 13,830

 13,823

 13,786

 13,727

 14,165

 14,046

 13,779

 13,911

 14,180

 14,016

 14,225

 14,098

 13,971

 14,292

 14,382

 14,150

 14,173

 14,195

 14,120

 14,120

 14,158

 14,158

STORAGE

+194

-268

-59

+0

+96

+88

+0

-15

-7

-81

-7

-37

-59

+438

-119

-267

+132

+269

-164

+209

-127

-127

+321

+90

-232

+23

+22

-75

+0

+38

+0

CHANGE

415

182

288

316

364

349

314

306

312

274

310

296

286

544

617

179

541

876

233

421

253

719

486

360

197

328

328

279

318

336

318

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 71

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

OUTLETS

 3

 3

 4

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 2

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 0

 1

 1

 0

 2

 3

 3

 4

 3

 4

C.F.S.

 .13

 .00

 .20

 .09

 .09

 .02

 .03

 .10

 .08

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .10

 .08

 .08

 .04

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .10

 .15

 .13

 .05

 .03

 .11

 .07

 .13

 .14

 .20

 .15

 .18

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 25, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +276 11,345 2,471 6,820 0 56 2.87

ACRE-FEET +276 22,503 4,901 13,527 0 111

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,901

TOTAL RIVER 18,428 22,121

 13,882

 3,693

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 21

 375

 14

 172

 438

 14

 14

 14

 483

 23

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 1,862

 3,693

Table 6
#### § 19.128 Change in name of proprietor.

If the name of the proprietor changes, the proprietor must file a letterhead application to amend the operating permit. The proprietor may not conduct operations under the new name before TTB approves the amended operating permit. However, the proprietor does not have to file a new bond or consent of surety.

(26 U.S.C. 5172, 5271)
(No. 73-CC-37

#### University of Evansville, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 27, 1973.*

University of Evansville, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### John Lanham v. First National Bank of Crete.

Filed February 23, 1899.

No. 8717.

Review. No question of law is presented in. this case. Evidence *held*to sustain the verdict.

Error from the district court of Saline county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

*Affirmed.*

*E. S. Abbott,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. I. Foss*and *Norman Jaclcson, contra.*

*163Irvine, C.

This was an action by Lanham, under the provisions of the act of congress relating to nsnry in contracts with national banks, to recover the penalty for usurious interest alleged to have been paid. Demurrers to the three counts of the petition Avere sustained, the action dismissed, and the case brought to this court for review. It was here held that as to one payment pleaded in the third count of the petition a cause of action not barred by the statute of limitations was pleaded. *(Lanham v. First Nat. Bank,*42 Neb. 757.) After the cause had been remanded an ansAver in the form of a general denial was filed and a tidal had which resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The case is again brought here by the plaintiff, and the sole question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The evidence on neither side was very satisfactory, but on examination we are convinced that it was of such a character as to forbid interference with the action of the jury thereon.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 of National Bancshares Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004     /s/ Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr.   Lawrence M. Cardinal, Jr., Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 585.53

 585.92

 585.26

 582.42

 580.77

 584.42

 584.85

 585.46

 585.86

 584.99

 584.68

 582.67

 584.89

 585.54

 583.85

 585.04

 584.23

 584.05

 585.19

 584.67

 585.26

 583.10

 584.52

 585.02

 584.33

 581.97

 579.09

 583.38

 582.09

 581.50

 582.57

 22,840

 23,085

 22,670

 20,937

 19,968

 22,149

 22,414

 22,796

 23,047

 22,501

 22,310

 21,086

 22,439

 22,846

 21,799

 22,532

 22,032

 21,921

 22,626

 22,303

 22,670

 21,344

 22,211

 22,520

 22,094

 20,668

 19,013

 21,514

 20,740

 20,393

 21,026

STORAGE

+722

+245

-415

-1,733

-969

+2,181

+265

+382

+251

-546

-191

-1,224

+1,353

+407

-1,047

+733

-500

-111

+705

-323

+367

-1,326

+867

+309

-426

-1,426

-1,655

+2,501

-774

-347

+633

CHANGE

13,047

12,797

12,525

12,262

12,547

14,184

13,233

13,288

13,222

12,825

12,995

12,455

13,681

13,250

12,619

13,513

12,882

13,077

13,502

12,973

13,320

12,454

13,577

13,294

12,914

12,226

11,725

14,633

12,202

12,491

13,197

INFLOW

 12,589

 12,582

 12,640

 13,044

 12,944

 12,992

 13,008

 13,004

 13,005

 13,007

 12,999

 12,979

 12,905

 12,952

 13,054

 13,052

 13,042

 13,040

 13,053

 13,043

 13,042

 13,031

 13,050

 13,047

 13,037

 10,138

 1,882

 7,221

 12,501

 12,575

 6,510

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,714

 10,586

 6,060

 0

 0

 6,277

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 9

 6

 9

 7

 7

 7

 6

 6

 5

 8

 7

 8

 9

 8

 8

 6

 7

 8

 9

 8

 8

 7

 5

 6

 7

 8

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 3, 2018

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,092 402,910 374,968 25,637 2,635 219

ACRE-FEET -1,092 799,172 743,749 50,851 5,227 434

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 743,749

SPILL 50,851

 22,118

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,526

 1,697

 2,160

 1,812

 1,715

 1,510

 1,214

 1,850

 1,774

 2,290

 1,818

 1,144

 1,516

 1,034

 1,694

 1,763

 1,689

 1,674

 1,954

 1,746

 1,675

 2,034

 1,153

 1,682

 1,062

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 41,270

 81,859

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 10,741

 10,357

 9,606

 9,857

 10,042

 11,908

 11,196

 10,696

 10,666

 9,752

 10,448

 10,538

 11,418

 11,365

 10,204

 10,942

 10,423

 10,622

 10,729

 10,402

 10,897

 9,641

 11,613

 10,821

 10,959

 11,455

 10,811

 13,261

 12,885

 12,138

 12,755

 339,148

 672,700

Table 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.46

 1,198.46

 1,198.47

 1,198.41

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.42

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.69

 1,198.78

 1,198.79

 1,198.94

 1,198.75

 1,198.65

 1,198.59

 1,198.55

 1,198.52

 1,198.72

 48.71

 48.71

 48.73

 48.62

 48.60

 48.59

 48.57

 48.55

 48.55

 48.53

 48.53

 48.53

 48.53

 48.53

 48.53

 48.64

 48.76

 48.73

 49.12

 49.28

 49.29

 49.56

 49.22

 49.05

 48.94

 48.87

 48.82

 49.17

STORAGE

-0.04

+0.00

+0.02

-0.11

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.11

+0.12

-0.04

+0.39

+0.16

+0.02

+0.27

-0.34

-0.18

-0.11

-0.07

-0.05

+0.35

CHANGE

159

177

152

81

118

108

102

94

102

88

97

96

96

95

46

193

265

168

614

608

549

881

359

286

252

227

206

634

INFLOW

 173

 173

 139

 130

 123

 115

 108

 100

 100

 93

 93

 93

 93

 93

 43

 139

 200

 182

 416

 524

 537

 744

 524

 370

 302

 258

 229

 452

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 1

 2

 2

 1

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 2

 0

 1

 3

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .72

 .19

 .29

 .59

 .43

 .53

 .32

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .48

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/01/2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.40 6,853 27 6,546 65 1.17 3.73

ACRE-FEET +400 13,593 54 12,984 129

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 12,984

OUTLET

TOTAL

 54

 13,038

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.73

JULY 1, 2004 17.70

 48.75
### §609. Use of military authority to influence vote of member of Armed Forces

Whoever, being a commissioned, noncommissioned, warrant, or petty officer of an Armed Force, uses military authority to influence the vote of a member of the Armed Forces or to require a member of the Armed Forces to march to a polling place, or attempts to do so, shall be fined in accordance with this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. Nothing in this section shall prohibit free discussion of political issues or candidates for public office.

(Added Pub. L. 99–410, title II, §202(a), Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 609, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 723, prescribed maximum contributions and expenditures limitation of $3,000,000 for any calendar year, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 92–225, title II, §204, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 10, effective sixty days after Feb. 7, 1972.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to elections taking place after Dec. 31, 1987, see section 204 of Pub. L. 99–410, set out as a note under section 20301 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00766

- CR

Anthony JOHNSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0527

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTIN EZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### § 24.126 Change in proprietorship involving a bonded wine warehouse.

Where a bonded wine warehouse has been established on wine premises and it is desired to continue the operation of the bonded wine warehouse subsequent to a change in the proprietorship of the bonded winery or bonded wine cellar, the proprietor of the bonded wine warehouse shall file a letter application, accompanied by an affirming statement from the new proprietor of the bonded winery or bonded wine cellar, requesting the continuation of the bonded wine warehouse and also file evidence of sufficient bond coverage, except where § 24.146(d) does not require bond coverage.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5353))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0058)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1124, Jan. 4, 2017]
### §2012. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–283, title II, §202, Oct. 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 1016, which related to the modification of tariff schedules to implement duty free motor vehicle agreements and duty reduced or duty free automotive product agreements, the necessity for advice and public notice prior to negotiation of such agreements, the transmission to the Congress of copies of such agreements, and Presidential proclamations to implement such agreements, expired by its own terms on Oct. 22, 1965.
### §1677b–1. Currency conversion

#### (a) In general

In an antidumping proceeding under this subtitle, the administering authority shall convert foreign currencies into United States dollars using the exchange rate in effect on the date of sale of the subject merchandise, except that, if it is established that a currency transaction on forward markets is directly linked to an export sale under consideration, the exchange rate specified with respect to such currency in the forward sale agreement shall be used to convert the foreign currency. Fluctuations in exchange rates shall be ignored.

#### (b) Sustained movement in foreign currency value

In an investigation under part II of this subtitle, if there is a sustained movement in the value of the foreign currency relative to the United States dollar, the administering authority shall allow exporters at least 60 days to adjust their export prices to reflect such sustained movement.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §773A, as added Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §225(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4886.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title.