alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-872]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Advisory Board, February 7, 2011, 6:30 p.m. to February 9, 2011, 
12 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on 
December 29, 2010, 75 FR 82035.
    This notice is being amended to cancel the Subcommittee on Clinical 
Investigations meeting on February 7, 2011 from 6:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. and 
to cancel the National Cancer Advisory Board Meeting on February 9, 
2011 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public on 
February 8, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. and the closed session will 
be from 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-872 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**882 CA 14-00013**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

BONNIE YOUNG AND MICHAEL RONDINELLO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

BARBARA LACY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, BUFFALO (J. WILLIAM SAVAGE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GREENE & REID, PLLC, SYRACUSE (EUGENE W. LANE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered April 23, 2013. The order and judgment awarded money damages to plaintiff Bonnie Young.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Eric D . [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051).

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
fAA-"L.OIO-II~3

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization

National Business Aircraft Association

Regional Airline Association

Aircrafl Owners & Pilots Association

ATA

ATA

Person Contacted

Eli Colti

I

Dave Loiterer

Robert Hackman

Craig Fabian

1\'1Lopez

Dale Response
#### § 19.419 Withdrawals of spirits for use in wine production.

A proprietor may withdraw wine spirits without payment of tax for transfer in bond to a bonded wine cellar for use in wine production. The proprietor, as consignor, must prepare a transfer record in accordance with § 19.620. In addition, the proprietor must prepare a package gauge record in accordance with § 19.619 and must attach it to the transfer record, unless the wine spirits are already in packages and are being withdrawn on the production or filling gauge.

(26 U.S.C. 5214, 5373)
EXHIBIT 99.12
-------------




AT THE TRUST                AT THE FINANCIAL RELATIONS BOARD
Karen Dickelman             Tony Ebersole          Georganne Palffy
Investor Relations          General Information    Analyst Inquiries
312 683-3671                312 640-6727           312 640-6768
ir@banyanreit.com





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MONDAY,  JANUARY 10, 2000




         BANYAN STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST DECLARES FOURTH QUARTER
                        1999 CASH DISTRIBUTION



CHICAGO, JANUARY 10, 2000 - Banyan Strategic Realty Trust (Nasdaq:BSRTS)
today declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.12 per share for the
fourth quarter ended December 31, 1999.  The distribution is payable
February 22, 2000 to shareholders of record as of January 21, 2000.

Banyan Strategic Realty Trust is an equity real estate investment trust
(REIT) with a portfolio that includes primarily flex/industrial and
suburban office buildings.  The properties are located in certain major
metropolitan areas and smaller markets of the Midwest and Southeastern
United States.  The Trust's current portfolio includes 27 properties
totaling 3.5 million rentable square feet.





           See Banyan's website at http//www.banyanreit.com.
   For further information regarding Banyan free of charge via fax,
                dial 1-800-PRO-INFO and enter "BSRTS."























                                 -30-
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.233 Transfer in bond.

A manufacturer of tobacco products may transfer tobacco products in bond, to the factory of any manufacturer of tobacco products. The transfer of tobacco products in bond to the premises of an export warehouse proprietor shall be in accordance with the provisions of part 44 of this chapter. However, tobacco products are eligible for transfer in bond to a manufacturer of tobacco products or to an export warehouse only if they bear the required marks, labels, and notices.

(72 Stat. 1418, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5704)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 37, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28082, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. ATF-421, 64 FR 71924, Dec. 22, 1999; 78 FR 38567, June 27, 2013]
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form
      10-QSB for the period from ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
      the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/
      Montse Zaman


Montse
      Zaman


CFO


Dated:
      May 14, 2008




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 24.315 Materials received and used record. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor who produces wine shall maintain a record showing the receipt and use or other disposition of basic winemaking materials received on wine premises. The record will show the date of receipt, the quantity received, the name and address from whom received, and the date of use or other disposition of the materials. For any material stored off wine premises, invoices or other commercial papers covering the purchase will also be kept available for inspection. Where grapes (or other fruit) received on wine premises are used in producing juice to be stored for future use or for removal, the record will show the quantity used and juice produced.
( b ) *Concentrated fruit juice.* When concentrated fruit juice or must is produced or received, the record will show the degrees Brix of the juice before and after concentration, the volume of juice before and after reconstitution, the volume of reconstitution water used for each dilution of the concentrate, and, if volatile fruit flavor was added, the kind and volume. Where fruit or juice is used to produce concentrated juice, the record will also show the quantity of fruit or volume of juice used. If the concentrated fruit juice is removed for use by another proprietor, a copy of the certificate required by § 24.180 will be retained. The record of concentrated fruit juice will contain the information necessary to determine compliance with the limitations prescribed in § 24.180. Incomplete or inaccurate records of concentrated fruit juice may result in the wine produced from the concentrated fruit juice to be designated substandard.
( c ) *Volatile fruit-flavor concentrate.* If volatile fruit-flavor concentrate is received, the record will show the volume received, the fold, the percent of alcohol by volume, any loss in transit, and the use or other disposition of the volatile fruit-flavor concentrate.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0298)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 540.62

 541.12

 541.61

 541.90

 542.15

 542.37

 542.58

 542.80

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 542.98

 542.94

 542.90

 542.87

 542.83

 542.79

 542.76

 542.73

 542.40

 542.07

 541.69

 541.69

 541.66

 541.62

 541.59

 541.74

 541.97

 541.97

 1,997,672

 2,003,996

 2,010,200

 2,013,875

 2,017,045

 2,019,836

 2,022,501

 2,025,295

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,581

 2,027,073

 2,026,565

 2,026,184

 2,025,676

 2,025,168

 2,024,787

 2,024,406

 2,020,216

 2,016,030

 2,011,213

 2,011,213

 2,010,833

 2,010,326

 2,009,946

 2,011,847

 2,014,762

 2,014,762

 7,016

 6,995

 6,977

 4,370

 3,482

 3,482

 3,474

 3,465

 865

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,429

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL July 6, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2017 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 23,281 0 7,971 40,156

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 6,191

 6,324

 6,204

 3,675

 3,170

 2,791

 2,665

 2,794

 2,540

 0

 0

 0

 0

-254

-508

-508

-381

-508

-508

-381

-381

-4,190

-4,186

-4,817

 0

-380

-507

-380

 1,901

 2,915

 0

 228

 208

 208

 228

 231

 288

 300

 296

 290

 233

 114

 10

 10

 205

 342

 325

 340

 314

 301

 314

 0

 641

 284

 292

 252

 255

 279

 267

 278

 556

 82

10,036

6,603

6,544

3,957

3,238

3,036

2,968

3,025

449

-128

-63

-6

-6

2,762

-417

-407

-358

-401

-394

-344

145

-340

-148

-437

-139

-311

-382

-318

2,577

-540

-45

ELEV STORAGE

 43,555

 933,050

 939,653

 946,197

 950,154

 953,392

 956,428

 959,396

 962,421

 962,870

 962,742

 962,679

 962,673

 962,667

 965,429

 965,012

 964,605

 964,247

 963,846

 963,452

 963,108

 963,253

 962,913

 962,765

 962,328

 962,189

 961,878

 961,496

 961,178

 963,755

 963,215

 963,170

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 923,014

3,497

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2,989

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6,486
#### Earl Willametz et al. *v.*Irving H. Lampman et al.

*John F. Scully,*for the appellees (defendants).

*John S. Brice,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued November 3

decided November 3, 1970

The motion by the defendant Bernard I. Friedman et al. to dismiss the purported appeal of the plaintiffs from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.

The motion by the plaintiffs for review and consolidation in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Brandon HEATH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10722

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00229-CR-J-24MCR.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 23, 2006.

Scott Brandon Heath, Ayer, MA, pro se.

Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, Esquire, appointed counsel for Scott Brandon Heath, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Heath, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heath’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABIER HESMI MONGE; CANDELARIA 

LOPEZ MORALES, 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-73471 

Agency Nos. A206-270-449 

A206-270-443 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Gabier Hesmi Monge and Candelaria Lopez Morales, natives and citizens of 

Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-73471 

Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. 

Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part 

the petition for review.

Petitioners do not meaningfully challenge the agency’s determination that 

they failed to establish that the harm they suffered or fear in Mexico was or would 

be on account of a protected ground. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 

(9th Cir. 2011) (a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening 

brief). Thus, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of petitioners’ CAT claim 

because they failed to show it is more likely than not they will be tortured by or 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See 

Garcia-Milian, 755 F.3d at 1033-35 (concluding that petitioner did not establish 

the necessary state action for CAT relief).

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ contentions regarding IJ error or 

persecution based on political opinion because they did not exhaust them before 

the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks 

jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
INITI AL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

PMN : 15- 01 90 

Post- Focus Dr a f t Revi sion 1 4/23/201 5 

SUBMI TTER : I ndust r i a l Special ty Chemi cal s 

MSDS : Yes Label : No 

Gen Eqpt : Su itable g l oves a nd eye/face prot ecti o n . 

Respirator : None listed . 

Heal t h Ef f ect s : Irri tating t o eyes, respi ratory system and skin . 

TLV/ PEL: 

1/27 /201 5) : 
Re l ated Cases a 

Ecotox : Same as 

(SAME) 

T Inf o : 

Ana l og : 

Migrat ion to grou ndwater : moderat e - r api d 

PBT rating : P2BlT2 

Heal t h : 2 Inha l a tion 

II Human Health : 

Eco : 2 Water (All rel eases t o wat er wit h a CC 88 ppb) 

OCCUPAT I ONAL EXPOSURE RATI NG : 2 - 3A 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS : 

I 
INITI AL REVIEW ENGI NEERI NG REPORT 

P~ : 

ISC Harvey Harvey I L 60426 

Days/yr: 1 00 

ENVI RONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER No te : The dai ly rel eases l i s ted f o r any source below may coi ncide 

with daily rel eases from the other sources to the same medium . 

Water or Air or Inci neration or Landfill 

Conservative: 1 . 2E+O kg/site- day over 100 days/yr f rom 1 site 

Landf i l l 

Output 2 : 2 . 5E+O kg/site- day over 100 days/yr from 1 s i te 

s i te- r from 1 s i te or 2 . 5E+2 kg/yr - a l l s i tes 

RELEASE TOTAL 

3.8E+2 kg/yr - all sites
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.53 Powers of attorney.

An applicant or permittee shall execute and file a Form 1534, in accordance with the instructions on the form, for each person authorized to sign or to act on behalf of the applicant or permittee. Form 1534 is not required for a person whose authority is furnished in accordance with § 20.42(a)(10).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 517.32

 517.96

 518.62

 519.43

 520.74

 523.42

 525.57

 526.97

 528.40

 529.81

 531.28

 532.71

 534.06

 535.46

 536.43

 537.56

 538.96

 539.98

 540.91

 541.67

 542.11

 542.20

 542.22

 542.11

 541.90

 541.70

 541.35

 540.80

 540.00

 539.00

 538.09

 270.3

 272.4

 274.7

 277.4

 281.9

 291.2

 298.9

 303.9

 309.1

 314.2

 319.7

 325.0

 330.1

 335.4

 339.1

 343.4

 348.9

 352.9

 356.5

 359.5

 361.3

 361.6

 361.7

 361.3

 360.4

 359.7

 358.3

 356.1

 353.0

 349.0

 345.5

STORAGE

+2.7

+2.2

+2.2

+2.8

+4.5

+9.3

+7.6

+5.0

+5.2

+5.2

+5.4

+5.3

+5.1

+5.3

+3.7

+4.4

+5.4

+4.0

+3.7

+3.0

+1.7

+0.4

+0.1

-0.4

-0.8

-0.8

-1.4

-2.2

-3.1

-3.9

-3.5

CHANGE

1,768

1,592

1,455

1,646

2,530

4,896

3,978

2,671

2,760

2,793

2,932

2,901

2,764

3,025

2,355

2,552

3,094

2,552

2,462

2,547

2,492

2,309

2,605

2,590

2,300

2,322

2,432

2,526

2,528

2,317

2,419

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 237

 465

 512

 512

 502

 486

 481

 481

 498

 613

 688

 679

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 115

 232

 73

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 122

 269

 158

 182

 339

 407

 579

 937

 1,384

 1,807

 2,065

 1,988

 1,987

 2,397

 2,871

 3,235

 3,324

 3,222

FRIANT-KERN

 9

 13

 10

 11

 20

 22

 6

 7

 12

 12

 0

 16

 5

 21

 12

 23

 9

 14

 13

 15

 10

 19

 15

 13

 15

 22

 22

 22

 17

 19

 14

C.F.S.

 .08

 .12

 .09

 .10

 .18

 .19

 .05

 .06

 .10

 .10

 .00

 .13

 .04

 .17

 .10

 .18

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .12

 .08

 .15

 .12

 .10

 .12

 .17

 .17

 .17

 .13

 .15

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 1.49

 .70

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .81

 .03

 .34

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +78.0 80,113 6,154 27,693 0 438 3.56 4.08

ACRE-FEET +77,960 158,904 12,206 54,929 0 869

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 54,929

 12,206 80,077

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE = 17.17

 267.5

 12,942 4.08

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 273

 259

 242

 242

 243

 170

 130

 131

 131

 176

 199

 201

 202

 202

 203

 175

 161

 183

 200

 201

 201

 214

 231

 231

 231

 231

 230

 230

 248

 263

 291

RIVER

 6,525

 12,942

RIVER
§ 463.71 How does the Secretary make an award under the Integrated English Literacy and Civics Education program? ( a ) The Secretary awards grants under the Integrated English Literacy and Civics Education program to States that have an approved Unified State Plan in accordance with § 463.90 through § 463.145, or an approved Combined State Plan in accordance with § 463.90 through § 463.145.
( b ) The Secretary allocates funds to States following the formula described in section 243(b) of the Act. ( 1 ) Sixty-five percent is allocated on the basis of a State's need for integrated English literacy and civics education, as determined by calculating each State's share of a 10-year average of the data of the Office of Immigration Statistics of the Department of Homeland Security for immigrants admitted for legal permanent residence for the 10 most recent years; and
( 2 ) Thirty-five percent is allocated on the basis of whether the State experienced growth, as measured by the average of the three most recent years for which the data of the Office of Immigration Statistics of the Department of Homeland Security for immigrants admitted for legal permanent residence are available.
( 3 ) No State receives an allotment less than $60,000.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3333)