alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Driggs *vs.*Garretson.

1. A stated account is, *prima facie,*a bar to a suit for account. But the-defendant in pleading it, must, by his plea, although neither fraud noierror be charged, aver that the stated account is just and true, to the best of his knowledge and belief.

2. For want of such averment, plea overruled, with leave to amend.

On bill for account. Plea of account stated.

*Mr. A. Zabrislcie,*for the plea.

*Mr. W. B. Williams,*contra.

The Chancellor.

. The bill is filed for an account. The complainant, who is the defendant's mother, was his general guardian by appointment of the Orphans Court of Hudson county, and his special guardian appointed under proceedings taken in this court, for sale of his lands while he was yet a minor. The bill does not allege that any account was ever stated between the parties. The defendant pleads that at a date which appears-by the bill to be subsequent to the time when he attained his majority, the complainant and defendant made up and stated 'an account in writing, of all sums of money received by the' complainant as guardian of the defendant, and of all moneys paid out by her, and of her money transactions as such guardian; that the account was made out by, or under her direction, and that it was inspected and examined by him and was signed as correct by both of them, -and was retained by the .complainant, no counterpart or copy having been given to the defendant. The plea further avers, that the amount SO' stated and allowed, showed in writing a balance of $2777.05,. as due to the defendant from the complainant as his guardian,. *179and that the defendant has since then received part of that balance.

A stated account is, *prima*facie, a bar to a suit for account. *Brown*v. *Van Dyke,*4 *Halst. Ch.*795; *Gilb. For. Rom.*56. But the defendant in pleading it, must, by his plea, although neither fraud nor error be charged, aver that the stated account is just and true to the best of his knowledge and belief. *Story’s Eq. PI.,*§ 802; 3 *Atk.*70; *Madd. Ch. Pr.*101; *Roche*v. *Morgell,*2 *Sch. & Lef.*721.

This plea is defective in this respect, and therefore must be overruled. Leave will be given, however, to amend.
### §917. Congressional findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) whales are a unique resource of great aesthetic and scientific interest to mankind and are a vital part of the marine ecosystem;

(2) whales have been overexploited by man for many years, severely reducing several species and endangering others;

(3) the United States has extended its authority and responsibility to conserve and protect all marine mammals, including whales, out to a two hundred nautical mile limit by enactment of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act [16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.];

(4) the conservation and protection of certain species of whales, including the California gray, bowhead, sperm, and killer whale, are of particular interest to citizens of the United States;

(5) increased ocean activity of all types may threaten the whale stocks found within the two hundred-mile jurisdiction of the United States and added protection of such stocks may be necessary;

(6) there is inadequate knowledge of the ecology, habitat, requirements, and population levels and dynamics of all whales found in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and

(7) further study of such matters is required in order for the United States to carry out its responsibilities for the conservation and protection of marine mammals.

(Pub. L. 94–532, §2, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2491; Pub. L. 96–561, title II, §238(b), Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3300; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title II, §211(b)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009–41.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, referred to in par. (3), is Pub. L. 94–265, Apr. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 331, which is classified principally to chapter 38 (§1801 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (3). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "Magnuson-Stevens Fishery" for "Magnuson Fishery".

1980—Par. (3). Pub. L. 96–561 substituted "Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act" for "Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title II, §211(b)], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009–41, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective 15 days after Oct. 11, 1996.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–561, title II, §238(b), Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3300, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective 15 days after Dec. 22, 1980.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 94–532, §1, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2491, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Whale Conservation and Protection Study Act'."
AFS

- 16

- 12336

- E

September 9, 2016

Exemption No. 13 1N
Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 9519

Maj. Matthew J. Niendorf
Chief, Flight Directives Division
Department of the Air Force

6500 South Mac Arthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Maj

. Niendorf :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No. 131

, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect , and lists the

conditi ons and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 9

, 2016

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of the U.S. Air Force ( USAF ) for an extension of Exemption No. 131 , as amended

. That exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to

conduct its hurricane reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising

alti tudes as prescribed by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons
relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requeste d extension of the exemption would not set a
precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the USAF.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 131

, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,
under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 106(f), 40113, 44701, which the FAA
Administrator has delegated to me, I grant the U.S. Air Force (USAF) an exemption from 14

CFR § 91.15 9 to the extent necessary to allow the USAF to conduct its hurricane
reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising altitudes as prescribed by
§ 91.159, subject to the conditions and limiations described below.

Conditions and Limitati ons

1. The pilot of an y USAF aircraft engaged in the operations allowed by this exemption is
not relieved of the responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft as required by other
provisions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extend s the termination date of Exemption No. 131 , as amended, to
September 30, 201 8

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
John Barbagallo

Deputy D irector, Flight Standards Service
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 129 121 123

2 127 122 124

3 129 123 124

4 125 122 123

5 125 121 123

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 128 125 126

9 132 127 128

10 133 128 130

11 133 129 131

12 134 132 133

13 138 133 134

14 138 133 135

15 137 133 135

16 142 129 135

17 138 135 136

18 141 135 137

19 141 135 137

20 143 136 138

21 146 137 140

22 145 135 140

23 147 137 142

24 141 132 138

25 141 129 133

26 145 132 136

27 146 134 138

28 148 133 138

29 148 135 138

30 151 135 140

31 155 133 141

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Period: July 2023 Run Date: 8/15/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5653 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5653

 To prohibit Federal agencies from purchasing or leasing new vehicles 
      that are not zero-emission vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2020

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal agencies from purchasing or leasing new vehicles 
      that are not zero-emission vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Green Federal Fleet Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE PURCHASE OR LEASE OF VEHICLES THAT ARE NOT 
              ZERO-EMISSIONS VEHICLES BY FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
except as provided in paragraph (2), the head of a Federal agency may 
not purchase or lease a non-tactical passenger vehicle from a non-
Federal entity unless that vehicle is a zero-emission vehicle.
    (b) Exemption.--The head of a Federal agency may purchase or lease 
a non-tactical passenger vehicle from a non-Federal entity that is not 
a zero-emission vehicle if the head determines that, with respect to a 
particular circumstance, using a zero-emission vehicle will not be 
technically feasible.
    (c) Application.--The prohibition established under subsection (a) 
shall not apply with respect to purchases made and leases entered into 
before the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Zero-emission vehicle.--The term ``zero-emission 
        vehicle'' means a passenger vehicle that produces zero exhaust 
        emissions of any criteria pollutant, precursor pollutant, or 
        greenhouse gas, other than water vapor, in any mode of 
        operation or condition, as determined by the Administrator.
            (2) Federal agency.--The term ``Federal Agency'' means an 
        establishment in the legislative, judicial, or executive branch 
        of the Federal Government.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.8



	 
	
1








	







	 
	
2








	







	 
	
3








	







	 
	
4








	







	 
	
5








	







	 
	
6








	







	 
	
7








	







	 
	
8








	







 

 

9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 505

 539

 566

 577

 588

 567

 555

 567

 572

 596

 604

 614

 592

 546

 525

 491

 473

 474

 450

 441

 428

 424

 410

 403

 400

 398

 390

 392

 394

 419

 448

 426

 459

 417

 330

 381

 328

 490

 336

 479

 450

 427

 442

 441

 425

 415

 408

 391

 400

 378

 363

 364

 365

 369

 360

 359

 449

 464

 492

 487

 511

 506

 469

 508

 497

 531

 523

 539

 532

 503

 494

 477

 455

 434

 426

 419

 413

 402

 387

 385

 383

 382

 378

 374

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
### Part F—Gun Possession
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

 

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

 

This Amendment No. 1 is made as of May 28, 2004 tothat certain Employment Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2001 (the“Agreement”), between Crown Media Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation withoffices at 6430 South Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 500, Greenwood Village,Colorado 80111, or its permitted assigns (“Employer”), and David Evans, 1464Lindacrest Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90210 (“Employee”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, Employer andEmployee desire to extend the term of the Agreement upon the terms andconditions hereinafter set forth;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable considerationthe receipt and sufficiency of which is mutually acknowledged, the partieshereto agree as follows:

 

1.             Section 2 – Term of Employment shall be amendedby replacing “the third anniversary date” with “the fourth anniversary date”thereby extending the Term until September 17, 2005, unless terminated earlieras provided in paragraph 8 of the Agreement.

 

2.             Section 3(a) – Salary; Signing Bonus shall beamended by providing that Employer shall pay to Employee a salary at the annualrate of $1,312,500 from September 18, 2004 through the end of the Term.

 

3.             Except to the extent amended herein, all terms andconditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

4.             This Amendment No. 1 is contingent upon and subject toEmployer and Employee executing an Amendment to that certain Restricted StockUnit Agreement dated as of May 29, 2003 between the parties, which Amendmentshall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

 

----

 

5.             This Amendment No. 1 may be signed in any number ofcounterparts, each of which shall be an original, and all of which, takentogether, shall constitute one instrument.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Employer has by its appropriate officer signed this Amendment No. 1 andEmployee has signed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first abovewritten.

 

 
|   | CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | By:                        | /s/ Charles Stanford |   |
|   |                       |
|   | Title:                     | Executive Vice President, General Counsel |   |
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | EMPLOYEE                   |
|   |                       |
|   | /s/ David Evans            |   |
|   | David Evans                |
|        |                            |  |  |  |  |  |

 

2

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 583.72

 584.54

 584.64

 584.77

 584.55

 583.15

 582.48

 583.63

 584.72

 584.32

 584.16

 583.88

 583.32

 583.29

 584.46

 582.24

 582.32

 582.54

 583.08

 583.91

 584.64

 583.39

 583.72

 583.80

 584.33

 584.64

 585.04

 585.92

 583.94

 583.18

 21,720

 22,223

 22,285

 22,365

 22,229

 21,374

 20,973

 21,665

 22,334

 22,087

 21,989

 21,817

 21,477

 21,459

 22,174

 20,829

 20,877

 21,008

 21,332

 21,835

 22,285

 21,520

 21,720

 21,769

 22,094

 22,285

 22,532

 23,085

 21,854

 21,392

STORAGE

+1,793

+503

+62

+80

-136

-855

-401

+692

+669

-247

-98

-172

-340

-18

+715

-1,345

+48

+131

+324

+503

+450

-765

+200

+49

+325

+191

+247

+553

-1,231

-462

CHANGE

7,054

6,046

5,623

5,164

5,092

4,488

4,514

4,955

4,942

4,484

4,558

4,515

4,482

4,623

4,999

3,953

4,652

4,700

4,793

4,883

4,857

4,241

4,730

4,682

4,833

4,463

4,267

4,266

3,360

3,750

INFLOW

 6,063

 5,705

 5,505

 5,040

 5,075

 4,830

 4,629

 4,519

 4,518

 4,523

 4,519

 4,515

 4,566

 4,546

 4,553

 4,545

 4,542

 4,548

 4,544

 4,543

 4,544

 4,541

 4,544

 4,572

 4,583

 4,281

 4,056

 3,902

 3,896

 3,898

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 82

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 4

 2

 2

 2

 1

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 12, 2018

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,465 141,969 138,645 0 2,547 39

ACRE-FEET +1,465 281,596 275,002 0 5,052 77

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 275,002

SPILL 0

 19,927

FISH TRAP 5,052

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 22

 25

 24

 82

 188

 16

 29

 26

 17

 301

 340

 337

 301

 447

 800

 493

 330

 387

 574

 480

 539

 613

 47

 289

 407

 46

 35

 37

 1,102

 638

 8,972

 17,796

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,418

 5,532

 5,038

 4,859

 4,430

 3,999

 3,991

 4,475

 4,472

 3,722

 3,751

 3,649

 3,714

 3,722

 3,773

 2,975

 3,871

 3,880

 3,812

 3,953

 3,897

 3,175

 4,062

 3,891

 3,898

 3,863

 3,660

 3,714

 1,251

 2,605

 118,052

 234,156

Table 8
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.20 Importers.

No person, except pursuant to a basic permit issued under the Act, shall:

(a) Engage in the business of importing into the United States distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages; or

(b) While so engaged, sell, offer or deliver for sale, contract to sell, or ship, in interstate or foreign commerce, directly or indirectly or through an affiliate, distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages so imported.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 359.92

 359.92

 359.92

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.86

 359.80

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.77

 359.79

 359.80

 359.80

 359.76

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.76

 359.76

 359.74

 531

 531

 531

 529

 529

 529

 529

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 527

 523

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 521

 522

 523

 523

 520

 521

 521

 521

 520

 520

 519

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-4

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

-4

+1

+1

+0

-3

+1

+0

+0

-1

+0

-1

CHANGE

 344

 370

 347

 292

 255

 246

 303

 320

 342

 342

 342

 322

 301

 287

 311

 310

 287

 224

 229

 212

 221

 240

 272

 272

 301

 266

 251

 253

 272

 278

 356

 353

 351

 354

 353

 352

 353

 353

 352

 351

 353

 352

 350

 320

 304

 305

 302

 301

 302

 277

 251

 252

 252

 217

 203

 203

 203

 201

 202

 201

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2021

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -12 0 8,879 8,612

ACRE-FEET -12 0 17,611 17,082

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 35,134

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 17,082

 69,827

 531

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,518

 1,528

 1,469

 1,411

 1,304

 1,271

 1,377

 1,449

 1,535

 1,521

 1,459

 1,427

 1,418

 1,360

 1,311

 1,290

 1,250

 1,164

 1,120

 1,045

 1,029

 1,133

 1,203

 1,166

 1,187

 1,160

 1,168

 1,132

 1,084

 799

 38,288

 75,944

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 17,611

 678

 767

 643

 646

 585

 558

 611

 656

 711

 700

 633

 632

 651

 645

 578

 552

 540

 526

 481

 475

 476

 551

 590

 590

 590

 599

 626

 587

 526

 310

 17,713

 35,134

RIVER CANALS
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
     2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Zygo Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 27, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

(1)  the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

(2)  the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated:  February 7, 2003


/s/ J. Bruce Robinson
---------------------------------
J. Bruce Robinson
Chairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer of
Zygo Corporation


Dated: February 7, 2003


/s/ Richard M. Dressler
---------------------------------
Richard M. Dressler
Vice President, Finance,
Chief Financial Officer of
Zygo Corporation



                                       31
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5451 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 599 East Genesse Street in Fayetteville, New 

York, as the ‘‘George H. Bacel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5451 EH

1 SECTION 1. GEORGE H. BACEL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 599 East Genesse Street in Fay4 etteville, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘George H. Bacel Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George H. Bacel Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5451 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Fayetteville, New York, as the ‘‘George H. Bacel al Service located at 599 East Genesse Street in
### Part H—Federal Share; Federal Administrative Responsibilities
### §1452. Lading on Sundays, holidays, or at night

No merchandise or baggage entered for transportation under bond or for exportation with the benefit of drawback, or other merchandise or baggage required to be laden under customs supervision, shall be laden on any vessel or vehicle at night or on Sunday or a holiday, except under special license therefor to be issued by the appropriate customs officer under the same conditions and limitations as pertain to the unlading of imported merchandise or merchandise being transported in bond.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §452, 46 Stat. 715; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §452, 42 Stat. 955. That section was superseded by section 452 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to appropriate customs officer for reference to collector.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.