alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 584.97

 585.59

 585.16

 584.56

 583.95

 582.97

 582.78

 582.21

 582.62

 583.35

 583.97

 584.69

 584.08

 583.79

 583.49

 586.27

 583.28

 583.78

 583.68

 584.21

 584.04

 581.15

 581.56

 583.32

 585.09

 581.32

 581.58

 582.87

 581.54

 22,488

 22,878

 22,607

 22,236

 21,860

 21,265

 21,152

 20,811

 21,056

 21,495

 21,872

 22,316

 21,939

 21,763

 21,580

 23,307

 21,453

 21,756

 21,696

 22,020

 21,915

 20,188

 20,428

 21,477

 22,564

 20,288

 20,440

 21,205

 20,416

STORAGE

+302

+390

-271

-371

-376

-595

-113

-341

+245

+439

+377

+444

-377

-176

-183

+1,727

-1,854

+303

-60

+324

-105

-1,727

+240

+1,049

+1,087

-2,276

+152

+765

-789

CHANGE

4,649

4,684

4,352

4,302

4,310

4,187

4,437

4,333

4,602

4,705

4,678

4,729

4,306

4,393

4,389

5,386

7,532

32,473

47,773

48,348

49,953

48,947

49,405

49,796

28,471

33,772

50,138

50,537

48,549

INFLOW

 4,411

 4,402

 4,404

 4,404

 4,414

 4,400

 4,409

 4,418

 4,392

 4,398

 4,400

 4,418

 4,409

 4,397

 4,395

 4,429

 7,649

 13,191

 11,886

 10,055

 10,949

 10,754

 10,118

 9,816

 10,877

 10,512

 10,297

 10,359

 10,609

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 728

 19,082

 35,916

 38,128

 39,056

 39,063

 39,165

 39,451

 17,046

 24,407

 39,764

 39,792

 38,336

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 46

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 2

 0

 2

 1

 1

 3

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 5

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 29, 2004

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,770 618,136 207,572 409,934 1,491 31

ACRE-FEET -1,770 1,226,073 411,719 813,104 2,957 61

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 411,719

SPILL 813,104

 22,186

FISH TRAP 2,957

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 291

 451

 576

 449

 260

 258

 270

 288

 566

 281

 262

 253

 135

 157

 257

 2,122

 2,928

 4,239

 4,236

 4,238

 4,236

 4,243

 4,240

 3,302

 3,223

 4,189

 4,326

 3,802

 2,232

 56,310

 111,691

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 4,054

 3,812

 3,264

 3,421

 3,791

 3,679

 3,924

 3,871

 3,886

 4,247

 4,159

 4,217

 3,910

 4,009

 3,859

 1,662

 2,011

 28,797

 44,026

 43,844

 44,252

 43,434

 44,338

 45,973

 16,523

 30,581

 47,237

 49,088

 48,654

 548,523

 1,087,995

Table 8
### §1697. Transportation of persons acting as private express

Whoever, having charge or control of any conveyance operating by land, air, or water, knowingly conveys or knowingly permits the conveyance of any person acting or employed as a private express for the conveyance of letters or packets, and actually in possession of the same for the purpose of conveying them contrary to law, shall be fined under this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 777; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(C), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §305 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §182, 35 Stat. 1124).

Same changes were made as in section 1694 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $150".
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 15
- 00 318
- CR

________________ IN RE MARVIN HOLMES

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08
- 04992
- A

________________________________________ __________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Marvin Holmes filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in which he alleges that the trial court illegally sentenced him after he pleaded no
contest pursuant to a plea bargain agreement . Holmes has not demonstrated that he is clearly entitled t o mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel

. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist. , 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that2 relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted August 25, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 26, 2015 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
April 2024

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

49.06

1 1,198.57 48.90 -0.16 206 0 282 5 0.08 0.00

2 1,198.53 48.83 -0.07 204 0 240 0 0.00 0.17

3 1,198.50 48.78 -0.05 189 0 210 6 0.11 0.00

4 1,198.47 48.72 -0.05 166 0 182 11 0.19 0.00

5 1,198.51 48.79 0.07 257 0 220 1 0.02 0.69

6 1,198.49 48.76 -0.04 186 0 201 3 0.06 0.00

7 1,198.47 48.72 -0.04 166 0 182 2 0.04 0.00

8 1,198.45 48.69 -0.04 151 0 164 5 0.09 0.00

9 1,198.43 48.65 -0.04 136 0 147 7 0.13 0.00

10 1,198.43 48.65 0.00 152 0 147 5 0.09 0.00

11 1,198.42 48.63 -0.02 135 0 138 6 0.11 0.00

12 1,198.40 48.60 -0.04 116 0 122 12 0.21 0.00

13 1,198.40 48.60 0.00 132 0 122 10 0.18 0.14

14 1,198.43 48.65 0.05 176 0 147 2 0.04 0.21

15 1,198.42 48.63 -0.02 132 0 138 3 0.05 0.08

16 1,198.41 48.62 -0.02 125 0 130 4 0.07 0.00

17 1,198.40 48.60 -0.02 119 0 122 6 0.10 0.00

18 1,198.39 48.58 -0.02 111 0 114 6 0.10 0.00

19 1,198.38 48.56 -0.02 104 0 107 6 0.11 0.00

20 1,198.38 48.56 0.00 113 0 107 6 0.11 0.00

21 1,198.37 48.55 -0.02 99 0 99 9 0.15 0.00

22 1,198.36 48.53 -0.02 92 0 92 9 0.15 0.00

23 1,198.36 48.53 0.00 102 0 92 10 0.17 0.00

24 1,198.35 48.51 -0.02 82 0 85 6 0.11 0.00

25 1,198.35 48.51 0.00 90 0 85 5 0.09 0.00

26 1,198.34 48.49 -0.02 74 0 78 5 0.09 0.00

27 1,198.33 48.48 -0.02 69 0 71 7 0.12 0.00

28 1,198.33 48.48 0.00 78 0 71 7 0.12 0.00

29 1,198.32 48.46 -0.02 67 0 65 11 0.19 0.00

30 1,198.31 48.44 -0.02 59 0 59 9 0.15 0.00

TOTALS -0.67 3,888 0 4,019 184 3.23 1.29

ACRE-FEET -670 7,712 0 7,972 365

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

 Data based on 24 hour period ending 0800.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 7,972

Total 7,972

Precipitation

This month = 1.29

October 01, 2023 To date = 24.22

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

East Park Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 5/10/2024
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8580]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 163; OMB Control No. 3235-0619; SEC File No. 270-556.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 163 (17 CFR 230.163) provides an exemption from Section 5(c) 
(15 U.S.C. 77e(c)) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et 
seq.) for certain communications by or on behalf of a well-known 
seasoned issuer. The information filed under Rule 163 is publicly 
available. We estimate that it takes approximately 0.24 burden hours 
per response to provide the information required under Rule 163 and 
that the information is filed by approximately 53 respondents for a 
total annual reporting burden of approximately 13 hours. We estimate 
that 25% of 0.24 hours per response (0.06 hours) is prepared by the 
respondent for a total annual burden of approximately 3 hours (0.06 
hours per response x 53 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this 
information collection at the following Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for 
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an e-
mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25764d4442504351447a644d484041654a48470b404a550b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc8fb4bdbba9baa8bd839db4b1b9b89cb3b1bef2b9b3acf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an 
e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87d7d5c6d8cae6eeebe5e8ffc7f4e2e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="055557445a48646c69676a7d457660662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB 
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: April 8, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8580 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(March 19, 1943.)

#### Theodore F. Bowes, as Trustee under the Will of Cora H. Dyer, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. First Trust & Deposit Company, Appellant.

Memorandum; The decision of the referee amounts to a holding *713that, when a bank acquires knowledge that a trustee is misappropriating trust funds, which are on deposit in the bank, from that time forward the bank is charged with the burden oj; proving that all withdrawals of funds by the trustee were for legitimate purposes of the trust. No such burden rests on the bank. *“*Although the depositor is drawing checks which the bank may surmise or suspect are for his personal benefit, it is bound to presume, in the absence of adequate notice to- the contrary, that they are properly and lawfully drawn.” *(Bischof*v. *Yorkville Bank,*218 N. Y. 106.) The trustee in this case was educating two infant children with the trust funds. He might properly draw lump sums to be expended in piecemeal for the needs of the infants, as permitted by the trust, and the bank does not have the burden of proof, which has been cast upon it, of showing that every withdrawal was proper. Furthermore, assuming for the sake of argument, that the bank was charged with that burden, it was error not to permit the bank to bear its burden by showing memoranda of items of expenditure made by the trustee on cheek stubs and vouchers. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 37Aa.) This is especially true, since the trustee was dead, and other proof was practically impossible. In view of the fact that there is, in this record, some evidence from which a finder of the facts could find that the defendant did have knowledge of the improper use, by the trustee of one or two withdrawals, a new trial should be had. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to recover certain trust funds claimed to have been negligently handled. The order denies defendant’s motion to reopen the case and amend its answer.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
§ 668.117 Authority and responsibilities of the hearing official. ( a ) The hearing official regulates the course of the proceedings and the conduct of the parties following a request for review and takes all steps necessary to conduct fair and impartial proceedings.
( b ) The hearing official is not authorized to issue subpoenas or compel discovery as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( c ) The hearing official shall take whatever measures are appropriate to expedite the proceedings. These measures may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Scheduling of conferences.
( 2 ) Setting time limits for oral arguments and the submission of briefs.
( 3 ) Terminating the hearing process and issuing a decision against a party if that party does not meet time limits established by the hearing official.
( d ) The hearing official is bound by all applicable statutes and regulations. The hearing official may not— ( 1 ) Waive applicable statutes and regulations; or
( 2 ) Rule them invalid.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987, correctly designated at 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 47753, Oct. 19, 1992]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130452 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MARSHALL POWELL, JR., Individually, Stephen J. Markman, and MARSHALL POWELL, JR., and Justices BARBARA JARRELLS, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of FLORCIE MAE POWELL, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 130452 COA: 263639 Wayne CC: 04-407872-NH OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., d/b/a OAKWOOD ANNAPOLIS HOSPITAL, ALOK SHUKLA, M.D., and JAMES NEUENSCHWANDER, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of April 13, 2007 , the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in ab eyance pending the decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of th e Court, the case having been decided on Nove mber 28, 2007, ___ Mi ch ___ (2007), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G )(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for entry of an ord er denying the defendants' motion for summary disposition and for further proceedings not inco nsistent with this order and the order in
Mullins

.

C AVANAGH , J., not participating, due to a familial relationship with counsel of

record.

l1211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Sirgo                                               
|Mark A. Sirgo President and Chief Executive
Officer May 15, 2009
### §4661. Establishment

The Secretary of Labor shall—

(1) hire and fix the compensation of up to 5 additional full-time officers or employees of the Department of Labor; and

(2) detail or assign such officers or employees to the United States Embassy or a United States Consulate in Mexico to carry out the duties described in section 4662 of this title.

(Pub. L. 116–113, title VII, §721, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 86.)
### §4663. Status

Any officer or employee, while detailed or assigned under this part, shall be considered, for the purpose of preserving their allowances, privileges, rights, seniority, and other benefits as such, an officer or employee of the United States Government and of the agency of the United States Government from which detailed or assigned, and shall continue to receive compensation, allowances, and benefits from program funds appropriated to that agency or made available to that agency for purposes related to the activities of the detail or assignment, in accordance with authorities related to their employment status and agency policies.

(Pub. L. 116–113, title VII, §723, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 86.)
Exhibit 10.2


 


 





KUALA SELANGOR DISTRICT COUNCIL


 


“HONESTY & DILIGENT “


 


Our Ref : Bil (69) dlm.MDKS 301/18/1/2013/12


Date: 23 April 2015


 


Mssrs : ASNATECH CONSULT


32-1 , Tanjung SD 13/1,


Bandar Sri Damansara,


52200 Kuala Lumpur,


Selangor Darul Ehsan


 


Sir,


 


APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR PROPOSED MIXED DEVELOPMENT
( RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ) WITH STRATA TITLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6 ( 1A ) STRATA TITLE ACT 1985 VIA SURRENDERING AND
RE ISSUING OF TITLES UNDER SECTION 204D (KTN) ON PT 9135, IJOK COUNTY , KUALA SELANGOR DISTRICT, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN STATE , FOR
MSSRS IMPIANA MAKSIMA SDN. BHD.


 



 


We refer to the above matters and your letter dated 10 April
2015 which we received on 10 April 2015.


 


2. For you information the meeting of One Stop Center Committee
ref BIL 19/2013 dated 29 October 2013 had approved your application for Development Order based on your Application Plan ref. AT/KM/KS/PGCG/LAYOUT27-IMPIANA.


 


3. Appended herewith the approved Development Order and five
(5) copies of the approved Plan ref MDKS / JPP/ PS/ 21 / 2015 for your further actions. As such you are required to produce the
followings for further actions:


 


3.1 To present 20 copies of Pre-Computation Plan (
1 linen ) and 2 diskettes / CD Approved Plan and Pre-Computation Plan comply to the following formats:


		I)	Setback – “Cassini Projection”



		II)	Scale 1: 10,000/ 5,000



		III)	in dwg format



		IV)	Contain coordinate points



 


3.2 To present acknowledgment letter that land owner/developer
will abide by all the terms and conditions of approval set by Council upon presentation of Pre-Computation Plan for the acknowledgement
of this department.


 


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


Continuation :- Bil (69) dlm.MDKS 301/18/1/2013/12


 


4. Should the Developer / applicant not satisfied with the decision
or the terms , appeal can be made to SELANGOR STATE APPEAL BOARD, Urban and Rural Planning Unit according to the provision of sub-section
23 (1a) and ( b ) of Urban and Rural Planning Act 1976, (Act 172) within 30 days from the delivery of this approval.


 


 


Please be informed. The End.


 


Thank You.


 


“SERVING FOR THE COUNTRY”


 


By Order,


 


 


HAJAH NORAINI BINTI ROSLAN


President


Kuala Selangor District Council


 


 


c.c.


1. ~13. various agencies and Department


 


14. Impiana Maxima Sdn. Bhd.


 


 


 


 






    	2
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


AND
RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934






I,
Charles R. Blum, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Save the World Air,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
      August 13, 2008
            /s/
      CHARLES R. BLUMCharles
      R. BlumChief
      Executive Officer