alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 540

 545

 541

 564

 570

 581

 583

 601

 639

 676

 703

 732

 765

 810

 827

 851

 898

 940

 1,007

 1,068

 1,087

 1,124

 1,147

 1,182

 1,190

 1,207

 1,226

 1,218

 1,249

 1,251

 1,235

 445

 441

 443

 458

 465

 459

 469

 479

 482

 495

 508

 524

 555

 563

 587

 608

 642

 674

 708

 738

 760

 778

 817

 832

 862

 898

 935

 931

 967

 989

 1,005

 499

 495

 495

 499

 507

 515

 531

 542

 558

 580

 601

 621

 655

 675

 690

 700

 734

 774

 838

 899

 933

 960

 993

 1,006

 1,028

 1,062

 1,087

 1,080

 1,105

 1,110

 1,116

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 6, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.15

 1,901.25

 1,900.91

 1,901.21

 1,901.97

 1,901.98

 1,901.27

 1,901.17

 1,900.96

 1,901.28

 1,901.32

 1,901.01

 1,901.65

 1,901.72

 1,901.39

 1,900.70

 1,900.83

 1,901.47

 1,901.11

 1,901.12

 1,900.94

 1,901.33

 1,900.88

 1,901.69

 1,901.36

 1,901.12

 1,900.32

 1,900.72

 1,900.65

 1,900.74

 13,285

 14,098

 13,845

 14,068

 14,637

 14,644

 14,113

 14,038

 13,882

 14,120

 14,150

 13,918

 14,397

 14,450

 14,203

 13,690

 13,786

 14,263

 13,993

 14,001

 13,867

 14,158

 13,823

 14,427

 14,180

 14,001

 13,411

 13,705

 13,653

 13,720

STORAGE

-1,232

+813

-253

+223

+569

+7

-531

-75

-156

+238

+30

-232

+479

+53

-247

-513

+96

+477

-270

+8

-134

+291

-335

+604

-247

-179

-590

+294

-52

+67

CHANGE

5,452

6,338

5,232

5,497

6,045

5,946

4,953

5,462

5,304

5,425

5,251

5,083

5,109

5,002

4,719

4,485

4,708

4,857

4,737

4,492

4,294

4,410

4,109

4,495

3,881

3,792

3,645

3,554

3,923

3,871

INFLOW

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

POWER

 4,036

 3,910

 3,821

 3,739

 3,645

 3,580

 3,453

 3,380

 3,244

 3,193

 3,114

 3,048

 2,953

 2,871

 2,763

 2,631

 2,567

 2,525

 2,437

 2,382

 2,265

 2,226

 2,189

 2,094

 2,036

 1,913

 1,844

 1,843

 1,847

 1,843

SPILL

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

OUTLETS

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 6

 6

 3

 3

 6

 4

 2

 4

 5

 7

 4

 7

 6

 8

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 8

 7

 6

 9

 5

 7

C.F.S.

 .32

 .30

 .27

 .33

 .31

 .27

 .28

 .16

 .12

 .26

 .20

 .07

 .16

 .22

 .34

 .20

 .31

 .29

 .37

 .28

 .33

 .30

 .33

 .33

 .38

 .32

 .28

 .40

 .23

 .32

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 5, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -797 144,071 3,300 750 83,392 182 8.28

ACRE-FEET -797 285,765 6,546 1,488 165,408 361

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 6,546

TOTAL RIVER 173,442 286,206

 14,517

 112,764

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,895

 1,876

 1,397

 1,504

 1,971

 2,221

 1,627

 1,982

 2,001

 1,971

 1,983

 2,015

 1,776

 1,964

 1,939

 1,974

 1,951

 1,951

 2,293

 1,965

 1,955

 1,895

 1,947

 1,954

 1,827

 1,827

 1,957

 1,419

 1,962

 1,852

 56,851

 112,764

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 373.90

 375.14

 376.49

 377.93

 379.50

 381.20

 382.79

 384.31

 385.32

 386.40

 387.05

 387.71

 388.58

 388.94

 389.38

 390.02

 390.77

 391.75

 392.66

 393.31

 394.07

 394.77

 395.32

 395.84

 396.94

 397.28

 397.68

 398.07

 398.19

 398.36

 331,093

 339,391

 348,743

 358,661

 369,587

 381,552

 392,868

 403,797

 411,120

 419,003

 423,774

 428,639

 435,083

 437,760

 441,039

 445,826

 451,459

 458,860

 465,771

 470,731

 476,556

 481,943

 486,192

 490,222

 498,788

 501,447

 504,581

 507,644

 508,588

 509,927

 5,623

 3,404

 2,793

 3,563

 4,361

 4,262

 2,115

 4,187

 2,122

 1,833

 3,102

 1,046

 3,329

 2,099

 1,807

 1,279

 1,796

 1,275

 2,016

 1,753

 962

 1,196

 1,920

 1,897

 5,578

 1,400

 0

 810

 1,159

 1,828

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL November 15, 2016

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2016 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 187,786 0 14,824 8,678

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 8,952

 8,298

 9,352

 9,918

 10,926

 11,965

 11,316

 10,929

 7,323

 7,883

 4,771

 4,865

 6,444

 2,677

 3,279

 4,787

 5,633

 7,401

 6,911

 4,960

 5,825

 5,387

 4,249

 4,030

 8,566

 2,659

 3,134

 3,063

 944

 1,339

 478

 484

 485

 449

 472

 502

 483

 490

 497

 505

 478

 494

 477

 496

 508

 512

 527

 481

 487

 471

 466

 469

 465

 545

 582

 592

 616

 566

 225

 522

4,624

2,382

1,908

2,493

3,390

3,231

1,106

3,149

-8,809

925

2,333

1,237

2,467

1,324

1,133

-9,535

828

474

1,327

923

111

370

-8,818

1,078

4,723

711

-832

-7,518

625

1,318

ELEV STORAGE

 70,515

 67,095

 69,477

 71,385

 73,878

 77,268

 80,499

 81,605

 84,754

 75,945

 76,870

 79,203

 80,440

 82,907

 84,231

 85,364

 75,829

 76,657

 77,131

 78,458

 79,381

 79,492

 79,862

 71,044

 72,122

 76,845

 77,556

 76,724

 69,206

 69,831

 71,149

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 62,471

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-10,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

-10,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

-10,000

0

0

0

0

-7,730

0

0

-37,730
Line 2 gas solid SV48 gas SV48 solid SV49 gas SV49 solid 1 1.8 247 11 250 11.6 269 2 4.8 259 14 257 12 288 3 6.1 267 19.7 267 14 303 4 7.2 20.5 336 14.2 328 5 9.1 25.6 355 338 6 10.6 34 379 347 7 14.3 393 352 8 17.8 403 360 9 33 426 424 10 34 431 432 11 45 468 437 12 489 13 510 14 516 15 641 16 648 17 660 Mean = 16.70 257.67 20.80 437.00 12.95 352.55
n = 11.00 3.00 6.00 17.00 4.00 11.00

s= 14.26 10.07 8.26 130.12 1.34 57.49 df= 10.00 2.00 5.00 16.00 3.00 10.00 tp,df= 2.76 6.96 3.36 2.58 4.54 2.76 1/n+1/m = 0.09 0.33 0.17 0.06 0.25 0.09 sqrt (1/n +1/m) = 0.30 0.58 0.41 0.25 0.50 0.30 UPL = 28.68 298.23 32.19 519.49 16.00 400.82 UPL L2 gas = 48.19 UPL L2 solid = 920.31

m= (n+ 1)*.95 11.4 3.8 6.65 17.1 4.75 11.4 UPL = xm= 45.00 267.00 34.00 660.00 14.20 437.00 48.20 UPL L2 solid = 1097.00 Line 1 (SV46)

UPL L2 gas =
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 288

 290

 295

 306

 308

 351

 359

 361

 359

 313

 320

 320

 287

 295

 308

 303

 304

 370

 347

 408

 401

 382

 317

 269

 251

 249

 238

 226

 241

 245

 222

 223

 224

 226

 228

 234

 238

 237

 235

 226

 229

 226

 223

 223

 217

 220

 219

 226

 227

 232

 235

 235

 223

 212

 210

 204

 203

 200

 202

 203

 244

 244

 246

 249

 255

 273

 276

 277

 277

 260

 262

 260

 242

 247

 245

 243

 252

 265

 258

 278

 276

 283

 257

 241

 230

 221

 214

 209

 213

 212

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,290

 3,322

 3,353

 3,382

 3,413

 3,451

 3,482

 3,505

 3,536

 3,546

 3,572

 3,600

 3,606

 3,612

 3,613

 3,612

 3,618

 3,634

 3,637

 3,642

 3,642

 3,648

 3,628

 3,609

 3,577

 3,538

 3,510

 3,472

 3,440

 3,409

 235

 237

 240

 242

 244

 247

 249

 250

 253

 253

 255

 257

 258

 258

 258

 258

 258

 260

 260

 260

 260

 261

 259

 258

 256

 253

 251

 248

 246

 244

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 336

 299

 290

 287

 284

 281

 281

 276

 275

 273

 270

 271

 274

 277

 280

 296

 336

 319

 306

 304

 305

 305

 303

 307

 304

 309

 328

 316

 316

 259

 260

 260

 262

 262

 259

 254

 252

 252

 253

 253

 252

 253

 254

 257

 259

 266

 273

 272

 271

 272

 271

 271

 273

 274

 273

 273

 273

 271

 296

 278

 273

 271

 273

 268

 265

 262

 261

 259

 259

 259

 260

 262

 265

 272

 287

 288

 282

 280

 280

 280

 281

 282

 283

 285

 286

 282

 282

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,810

 5,329

 4,956

 4,665

 4,426

 4,238

 4,113

 4,025

 3,961

 3,906

 3,856

 3,814

 3,777

 3,746

 3,715

 3,709

 3,723

 3,740

 3,749

 3,761

 3,776

 3,794

 3,814

 3,837

 3,861

 3,887

 3,913

 3,933

 3,950

 415

 381

 354

 333

 316

 303

 294

 288

 283

 279

 275

 272

 270

 268

 265

 265

 266

 267

 268

 269

 270

 271

 272

 274

 276

 278

 280

 281

 282

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,545
<INVENTORY>                                     16,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,236
<PP&E>                                          66,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,857
<BONDS>                                          7,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,521
<SALES>                                        245,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,306
<CGS>                                          165,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0431 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HEATHER ARLETA CALLANTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 14 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 5 2021

03/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0431
February 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER JUDGE (2)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET

(1)

FRANCIS CARR

POWER PLANT C. F. S. INCHES

14.113

1 1,901.19 14.053 -60 290 0 104 189 27 0 0.00

2 1,901.16 14.031 -22 307 0 102 189 27 0 0.00

3 1,901.28 14.120 89 364 0 103 189 27 0 0.00

4 1,901.38 14.195 75 356 0 102 189 27 0 0.00

5 1,901.51 14.292 97 368 0 102 189 27 1 0.03

6 1,901.47 14.263 -29 365 0 105 189 86 0 0.02

7 1,901.47 14.263 0 394 0 105 189 99 1 0.05

8 1,901.16 14.031 -232 267 0 105 189 90 0 0.02

9 1,900.91 13.845 -186 335 0 104 189 135 1 0.05

10 1,901.20 14.061 216 430 0 104 189 27 1 0.03

11 1,901.05 13.948 -113 264 0 105 189 27 0 0.00

12 1,901.10 13.986 38 340 0 103 189 27 2 0.09

13 1,901.10 13.986 0 322 0 105 189 27 1 0.04

14 1,901.16 14.031 45 345 0 106 189 27 0 0.00

15 1,900.81 13.771 -260 371 0 286 189 27 0 0.00

16 1,901.10 13.986 215 642 0 318 189 27 0 0.00

17 1,901.29 14.128 142 589 0 301 189 27 0 0.00

18 1,901.36 14.180 52 505 0 263 189 27 0 0.00

19 1,901.37 14.188 8 532 0 312 189 27 0 0.00

20 1,901.38 14.195 7 852 0 624 189 27 8 0.38

21 1,901.35 14.173 -22 1,031 0 825 189 27 1 0.06

22 1,901.28 14.120 -53 856 0 667 189 27 0 0.00

23 1,901.26 14.105 -15 758 0 551 189 26 0 0.00

24 1,901.31 14.143 38 725 0 490 189 27 0 0.00

25 1,901.37 14.188 45 724 0 481 189 27 4 0.20

26 1,901.41 14.218 30 723 0 491 189 27 1 0.06

27 1,901.40 14.210 -8 730 0 518 189 27 0 0.00

28 1,901.45 14.248 38 750 0 515 189 27 0 0.00

TOTALS 135 14,535 0 8,097 5,292 1,057 21 1.03

ACRE-FEET 135 28,830 0 16,060 10,497 2,097 42

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE. (2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Total Power 0 Judge Francis Carr Powerplant 2,097

Total River 26,557 Total Release 28,655

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lewiston Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/28/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      381
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15
<INVENTORY>                                        252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1371
<PP&E>                                            5925
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              462
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2988
<SALES>                                           3681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3782
<CGS>                                             2835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     31
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 31
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (71)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (40)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Part A—State Personnel Development Grants
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Ameron International Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesS. Marlen, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, GaryWagner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|                                    | */s/ James S. Marlen*       |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                                    | James S. Marlen             |
| Director, Chairman of the Board,        |
| President & Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    | February 24, 2004      |
|                                    |                        |
|                                    | */s/ Gary Wagner*           |
|                                    | Gary Wagner                 |
|                                    | Senior Vice President & |
|                                    | Chief Financial Officer     |
|                                    | February 24, 2004      |

 

1

----
§ 19.76 Statement of plant security. As required by § 19.73(a)(12), the application for registration must include a statement of plant security. This statement must include the following information: ( a ) A general description of plant security, including methods used to secure buildings or plant operations located within a portion of a building and outdoor tanks;
( b ) A statement regarding the use of guard personnel;
( c ) A statement regarding the use of any electronic or mechanical alarm system;
( d ) A statement certifying that locks used will meet the requirements of § 19.192(f); and
( e ) A list of persons, by their position and title, who have the responsibility for the custody and access to keys for the locks.
(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5172)
1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3201

___________

John Starway, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District 

* of Minnesota.

Independent School District No. 625, *

also know as St. Paul Public Schools, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 7, 2001

 Filed: December 4, 2001

___________

Before McMILLIAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Starway appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in his action against his former employer, Independent School District No. 625 (ISD).

Starway claimed that, based on his national origin, he was subjected to a hostile work
2

Mr. Starway also sought attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

-2-

environment, in violation of Title VII, and was discharged, in violation of Title VII,

42 U.S.C. § 1981, and Minnesota law.2

Having reviewed the summary judgment grant de novo, see Austin v. Minn.

Mining & Mfg. Co., 193 F.3d 992, 994 (8th Cir. 1999), we affirm. Mr. Starway failed

to demonstrate his performance met ISD’s legitimate expectations. See Fragante v.

City and County of Honolulu, 888 F.2d 591, 598 (9th Cir. 1989) (employer may

honestly assess plaintiff’s oral communications skills when such skills are reasonably

related to job performance); cf. Taylor v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 251 F.3d 735,

740 (8th Cir. 2001) (to make prima facie case, employee must show, inter alia, job

performance at level that met employer’s legitimate expectations). Although ISD was

slow to provide Mr. Starway with guidance and an improvement plan, its actions,

under the circumstances, did not support an inference of pretext. See

Brousard-Norcross v. Augustana Coll. Ass’n, 935 F.2d 974, 976-77 (8th Cir. 1991)

(departure from policy did not support inference of pretext when departure was driven

by student complaint). Mr. Starway also failed to demonstrate that he was subjected

to harassment so severe and pervasive as to alter the conditions of his employment,

or that a causal nexus linked the efforts to fire him with his national origin. See

Austin, 193 F.3d at 994 (employee must establish causal connection between

harassment and protected-group status); Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21

(1993) (“Conduct that is not severe or pervasive enough to create an objectively

hostile or abusive work environment--an environment that a reasonable person would

find hostile or abusive--is beyond Title VII’s purview.”).

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; we deny Mr. Starway’s pending

motion; and we grant ISD’s request to strike documents that were not part of the

district court record, but we deny ISD’s request for sanctions.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EGU MACT -- Questions on floor data 12/13/2011 10:35 AM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob,

Thanks for sending data over for us to look at recently. A couple issues --- it does not seem as if we are looking at the total
set of data. It also may be that that area source calculations are off.

(1) The number of area sources (boilers) in the most recent EPA spreadsheet (Area source_baseline_emissions_estimates...) is 141 at 76 facilities. Ø The number of area sources (boilers) in the old EPA dataset (Basline_Emissions_Estimates_11302011) we were working on had 263 boilers at 141 facilities. Ø The fact that 141 is showing up in both data sets for different things could indicate that there may be a mistake. Can you confirm the number of potential area sources and facilities? That could have substantial implications for yesterday’s discussion Our calculation of the Major floor without area sources shows that the standard could change.

(2) The data we are using to look at the floor calculations seems to be lacking data. For example, on the (coal_acid_gases_floor analysis_111811) the plant Logan is in the floor with 6 observations, but it is unclear if there are other observations that are not included. In the main sheet “AcidGas_coal” there don’t seem to be those 6 observations -- -the min is there, but not the others.

Lastly, regarding the floor calcs --- it seems like the floor is being calculated by looking at the ave of the mins from the top 12; rather than the average of the obs from the top 12; or the average of the max from the top 12. Is there a particular methodology that has to be
followed?

Or perhaps since we are missing some of the data, it is not possible to replicate the calculations. Would it be possible to get a complete data set for examining the floor calculations?

Regards, Cortney