alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yolanda REYNA-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41119

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Yolanda Reyna-Rios appeals from her guilty plea conviction for attempted illegal entry into the United States after deportation following an aggravated-felony conviction. She argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

The Government argues that the waiver provision in Reyna-Rios’s plea agreement precludes her attack on the constitutionality of § 1326(b). We assume, *arguendo*only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal.

Reyna-Rios’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Reyna-Rios contends that *AlmendarezTorres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garzar-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Reyna-Rios properly concedes that her argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but she raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Harry Gottlieb, Respondent, *v.*A. Entemann, Inc., Appellant.

Second Department,

May 9, 1913.

Practice — discovery of machine — examination before trial.

An *ex parte*order, requiring a defendant to make discovery of a certain machine on which plaintiff was working when injured, and also requiring the president and foreman of defendant to submit to an examination before trial, is irregular and should be vacated,

*252Appeal by the defendant, A. Entemann, Inc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 2d day of April, 1913.

*Michael J. Tierney [Carl Schurz Petrasch*with him on the brief], for the appellant.

*Thomas J.*O’Neill, for the respondent.

Stapleton, J.:

The appeal is from an order denying a- motion to vacate an order, obtained *ex parte,*which required the defendant to make discovery of a certain machine, and the appliances connected therewith, on which the plaintiff was working when he sustained his injury, and which also required the president and the foreman of the defendant to appear and submit to an examination before trial. In other words, an application under article 4 of title 6 of chapter 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to the discovery of books and papers, is united with an application under article 1 of title 3 of chapter 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to depositions taken and to be used within the State. The applications are upon the same papers and are disposed of in the same order.

A reading of the provisions of the Code clearly demonstrates the irregularity of the original order and the error of the order appealed from. (See *Bloodgood*v. *Playback,*62 App. Div. 315; *Matter of Thompson,*95 id. 542.)

The learned counsel for the respondent, in his points, states that the appeal should be dismissed, without costs, because the case has gone to trial since the appeal was taken. There is nothing in the record before us which would warrant such a disposition of this appeal.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with costs.

Burr, Thomas, Carr and Bich, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2009-1377 

(Reexamination No. 90/007,080) 

IN RE ENCAPSULATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC 

 Brian D. Smith, Brian D. Smith, P.C., of Denver, Colorado, argued for appellant. 

 Mary L. Kelly, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, 

and William G. Jenks, Associate Solicitor. 

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office 

 Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-1377 

(Reexamination No. 90/007,080) 

IN RE ENCAPSULATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

in CASE NO(S). Reexamination No. 90/007,080 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED December 23, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
### §574. Exemption from taking other oaths

Nothing contained in title 34 of the Revised Statutes shall be construed to exempt the masters or owners of vessels from making and subscribing any oaths required by any laws of the United States not immediately relating to the collection of the duties on the importation of merchandise into the United States.

(R.S. §3094.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 34 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 34 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2517 to 3129. For complete classification of R.S. §§2517 to 3129 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §3094 derived from act Mar. 2, 1799, ch. 22, §110, 1 Stat. 703.
#### § 19.421 Withdrawals of spirits for use in production of nonbeverage wine and nonbeverage wine products.

A proprietor may withdraw spirits without payment of tax for transfer to a bonded wine cellar for use in the production of nonbeverage wine and nonbeverage wine products in accordance with part 24 of this chapter. The proprietor, as consignor, must prepare a transfer record in accordance with § 19.620. In addition, the proprietor must prepare a package gauge record in accordance with § 19.619 and must attach it to the transfer record, unless the wine spirits are already in packages and are being withdrawn on the production or filling gauge.

(26 U.S.C. 5214)
#### Hedwig Sieniewicz, as Administratrix of the Estate of Feliks Sieniewicz, Deceased, Appellant, v. Merusad Realty Corporation, Respondent.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial, h
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 584.93

 584.96

 583.48

 584.09

 584.64

 584.16

 583.68

 584.38

 584.71

 584.85

 584.29

 584.54

 584.37

 583.60

 584.20

 584.35

 583.93

 584.72

 585.35

 585.40

 579.80

 581.89

 583.53

 581.35

 581.67

 582.65

 582.12

 583.31

 585.31

 585.97

 585.25

 22,464

 22,482

 21,574

 21,946

 22,285

 21,989

 21,696

 22,124

 22,328

 22,414

 22,069

 22,223

 22,118

 21,647

 22,013

 22,106

 21,848

 22,334

 22,727

 22,758

 19,412

 20,622

 21,605

 20,305

 20,493

 21,074

 20,758

 21,471

 22,702

 23,116

 22,664

STORAGE

-162

+18

-908

+372

+339

-296

-293

+428

+204

+86

-345

+154

-105

-471

+366

+93

-258

+486

+393

+31

-3,346

+1,210

+983

-1,300

+188

+581

-316

+713

+1,231

+414

-452

CHANGE

11,966

11,525

11,081

12,241

12,193

11,864

11,874

12,747

13,500

14,314

14,261

14,493

14,368

14,103

14,544

14,409

14,281

14,665

14,560

14,431

12,635

14,873

14,879

13,670

14,359

15,199

14,843

15,433

15,665

15,368

14,630

INFLOW

 11,992

 11,459

 11,482

 11,997

 11,965

 11,956

 11,965

 12,474

 13,341

 14,214

 14,378

 14,358

 14,364

 14,282

 14,301

 14,305

 14,355

 14,362

 14,304

 14,357

 14,264

 14,206

 14,343

 14,319

 13,997

 14,341

 14,431

 14,502

 14,457

 14,563

 14,272

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 264

 559

 564

 565

 579

 588

 578

SPILL

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 33

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 6

 7

 7

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 8

 8

 7

 6

 8

 8

 8

 8

 7

 7

 6

 3

 6

 7

 7

 8

 8

 8

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 28, 2003

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +38 428,974 423,906 3,697 1,133 216

ACRE-FEET +38 850,870 840,818 7,333 2,247 428

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 840,818

SPILL 7,333

 22,626

FISH TRAP 2,247

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 867

 964

 986

 954

 974

 938

 1,008

 960

 2,048

 2,127

 1,780

 2,526

 2,512

 2,524

 1,234

 1,100

 1,522

 1,548

 1,453

 1,542

 1,457

 1,407

 1,580

 1,549

 1,422

 1,974

 1,895

 2,342

 895

 1,564

 1,146

 46,798

 92,824

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 10,396

 10,586

 10,223

 11,299

 11,201

 11,028

 10,948

 11,733

 11,894

 12,559

 12,747

 12,201

 12,150

 11,797

 13,555

 13,498

 12,983

 13,180

 13,100

 13,009

 11,317

 13,774

 13,666

 12,576

 13,139

 13,614

 13,335

 13,486

 14,996

 14,017

 13,822

 387,829

 769,259

Table 8
###### Editorial Note on Part 29

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 29 appear by T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42737, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 29.42 Delegations of the Administrator.

The regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.29, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 29, Stills and Miscellaneous Regulations. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16947, Apr. 4, 2006]
### §537. Officers, informers, and defendants as witnesses

No officer, or other person entitled to or claiming compensation under any provision of Act June 22, 1874 (chapter 391, 18 Statutes 188) shall be thereby disqualified from becoming a witness in any action, suit, or proceeding for the recovery, mitigation, or remission thereof, but shall be subject to examination and cross-examination in like manner with other witnesses, without being thereby deprived of any right, title, share, or interest in any fine, penalty, or forfeiture to which such examination may relate; and in every such case the defendant or defendants may appear and testify and be examined and cross-examined in like manner.

(June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §8, 18 Stat. 188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4 of Act June 22, 1874, referred to in text, providing for compensation to officers of the customs or other persons detecting goods being smuggled, was repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 989. For corresponding provisions in the Tariff Act of 1930, see section 1619 of this title.
October 2022

STORAGE RELEASE - C.F.S.

ACRE-FEET TULLOCH RIVER CANALS

DAY ELEV RES. CHANGE RELEASE OUTLET SPILL JOINT MAIN SOUTH MAIN

517

1 359.71 517 0 703 0 154 321 270

2 359.71 517 0 627 0 156 294 226

3 359.71 517 0 573 0 154 261 207

4 359.76 520 3 588 0 170 268 196

5 359.76 520 0 653 0 204 270 232

6 359.74 519 -1 646 0 204 262 233

7 359.74 519 0 627 0 203 236 243

8 359.74 519 0 628 0 201 239 242

9 359.76 520 1 627 0 202 239 232

10 359.77 521 1 542 0 206 163 225

11 359.76 520 -1 643 0 204 214 281

12 359.96 534 14 927 0 457 212 312

13 360.14 547 13 1,253 0 780 225 317

14 360.36 562 15 1,636 0 1,171 246 297

15 360.36 562 0 1,609 0 1,202 240 253

16 360.02 538 -24 1,353 0 949 239 256

17 359.89 529 -9 791 0 440 221 206

18 359.83 525 -4 729 0 307 199 284

19 360.02 538 13 1,004 0 548 204 302

20 360.14 547 9 1,239 0 794 236 291

21 360.36 562 15 1,539 0 1,172 214 243

22 360.36 562 0 1,557 0 1,202 211 241

23 360.04 540 -22 1,225 0 953 154 218

24 359.89 529 -11 674 0 437 114 201

25 359.83 525 -4 598 0 309 144 213

26 360.02 538 13 565 0 559 13 0

27 360.14 547 9 777 0 794 9 0

28 360.36 562 15 1,145 0 1,168 8 0

29 360.26 555 -7 977 0 1,004 0 0

30 360.02 538 -17 759 0 791 8 0

31 359.89 529 -9 410 0 429 7 0

TOTALS 12 27,624 0 17,524 5,671 6,221

ACRE-FEET 12 54,792 0 34,759 11,248 12,339

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Joint Main Canal 11,248 Outlet 0

South Main Canal 12,339 Spill 34,759

Total 58346.636

Historical Archive and Report Database

Goodwin Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/1/2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 670

 671

 681

 716

 739

 740

 750

 774

 818

 809

 783

 761

 775

 775

 779

 764

 820

 802

 879

 932

 979

 1,039

 1,063

 1,073

 1,095

 1,060

 1,068

 974

 931

 964

 955

 524

 549

 529

 533

 538

 549

 521

 572

 596

 583

 526

 550

 541

 547

 530

 581

 575

 615

 620

 639

 680

 715

 754

 767

 793

 830

 815

 792

 818

 783

 821

 582

 576

 573

 590

 613

 616

 637

 655

 706

 688

 684

 652

 629

 622

 627

 642

 662

 664

 690

 757

 802

 843

 851

 865

 912

 908

 915

 880

 863

 857

 854

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares
Corporation (the `Corporation`) for the period ending December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the `Report`), we, David C. Vernon, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, and James R. VanSickle, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

This Certification is executed as of March 29, 2011.

/s/ David C. Vernon
David C. Vernon
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ James R. VanSickle
James R. VanSickle
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(No. 74-CC-73

#### Gelman Instrument Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Natural History Survey, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 28, 1974.*

Gelman Instrument Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 676

 671

 671

 676

 681

 687

 687

 679

 672

 673

 673

 672

 678

 681

 681

 673

 673

 678

 683

 686

 699

 706

 702

 687

 685

 720

 723

 766

 757

 747

 733

 665

 655

 658

 667

 674

 674

 675

 669

 662

 668

 668

 657

 667

 676

 641

 667

 665

 670

 673

 665

 680

 698

 683

 679

 677

 687

 712

 724

 749

 708

 719

 670

 663

 665

 671

 676

 681

 680

 674

 668

 670

 671

 669

 673

 678

 674

 670

 670

 675

 680

 682

 686

 703

 695

 684

 681

 708

 720

 745

 753

 734

 723

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 21, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 430

 426

 427

 431

 434

 437

 436

 433

 429

 430

 431

 429

 432

 435

 433

 430

 430

 433

 436

 437

 440

 450

 446

 439

 437

 454

 461

 476

 481

 470

 463

TOTAL 21,292

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §2576b. Subpart definitions

Notwithstanding section 2571 of this title, for purposes of this subpart—

#### (1) Approval procedure

The term "approval procedure" means any registration, notification, or other mandatory administrative procedure for granting permission for a good or service to be produced, marketed, or used for a stated purpose or under stated conditions.

#### (2) Conformity assessment procedure

The term "conformity assessment procedure" means any procedure used, directly or indirectly, to determine that a technical regulation or standard is fulfilled, including sampling, testing, inspection, evaluation, verification, monitoring, auditing, assurance of conformity, accreditation, registration, or approval used for such a purpose, but does not mean an approval procedure.

#### (3) Objective

The term "objective" includes—

(A) safety,

(B) protection of human, animal, or plant life or health, the environment or consumers, including matters relating to quality and identifiability of goods or services, and

(C) sustainable development,

but does not include the protection of domestic production.

#### (4) Service

The term "service" means a land transportation service or a telecommunications service.

#### (5) Standard

The term "standard" means—

(A) characteristics for a good or a service,

(B) characteristics, rules, or guidelines for—

(i) processes or production methods relating to such good, or

(ii) operating methods relating to such service, and

(C) provisions specifying terminology, symbols, packaging, marking, or labelling for—

(i) a good or its related process or production methods, or

(ii) a service or its related operating methods,

for common and repeated use, including explanatory and other related provisions set out in a document approved by a standardizing body, with which compliance is not mandatory.

#### (6) Standards-related measure

The term "standards-related measure" means a standard, technical regulation, or conformity assessment procedure.

#### (7) Technical regulation

The term "technical regulation" means—

(A) characteristics or their related processes and production methods for a good,

(B) characteristics for a service or its related operating methods, or

(C) provisions specifying terminology, symbols, packaging, marking, or labelling for—

(i) a good or its related process or production method, or

(ii) a service or its related operating method,

set out in a document, including applicable administrative, explanatory, and other related provisions, with which compliance is mandatory.

#### (8) Telecommunications service

The term "telecommunications service" means a service provided by means of the transmission and reception of signals by any electromagnetic means, but does not mean the cable, broadcast, or other electromagnetic distribution of radio or television programming to the public generally.

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §473, as added Pub. L. 103–182, title III, §351(a), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2120.)
### §107b–1. Access to information with State licensing agencies; election and responsibilities of Committee of Blind Vendors

In addition to other requirements imposed in this title 1 and in the Randolph-Sheppard Act [20 U.S.C. 107 et seq.] upon State licensing agencies, such agencies shall—

(1) provide to each blind licensee access to all relevant financial data, including quarterly and annual financial reports, on the operation of the State vending facility program;

(2) conduct the biennial election of a Committee of Blind Vendors who shall be fully representative of all blind licensees in the State program,2 and

(3) insure that such committee's responsibilities include (A) participation, with the State agency, in major administrative decisions and policy and program development, (B) receiving grievances of blind licensees and serving as advocates for such licensees, (C) participation, with the State agency, in the development and administration of a transfer and promotion system for blind licensees, (D) participation, with the State agency, in developing training and retraining programs, and (E) sponsorship, with the assistance of the State agency, of meetings and instructional conferences for blind licensees.

(Pub. L. 93–516, title II, §209, Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1630; Pub. L. 93–651, title II, §209, Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–15.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title II of Pub. L. 93–516, Dec. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1617, known as the "Randolph-Sheppard Act Amendments of 1974". For complete classification of such title to the Code, see Short Title of 1974 Amendment note set out under section 107 of this title and Tables.

The Randolph-Sheppard Act, referred to in text, is act June 20, 1936, ch. 638, 49 Stat. 1559, also popularly known as the Randolph-Sheppard Vending Stand Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 107 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Randolph-Sheppard Act Amendments of 1974, and not as part of the Randolph-Sheppard Act which comprises this chapter.

The content of Pub. L. 93–516, including provisions of section 209 thereof which enacted this section, were originally contained in H.R. 14225, 93rd Congress, Second Session, which was pocket-vetoed during the 31-day intrasession adjournment of the 93rd Congress for the Congressional elections in November, 1974.

Pursuant to an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Kennedy v. Jones, D.C.D.C. 1976, 412 F.Supp. 353) H.R. 14225 was deemed to have become law without the approval of the President on Nov. 21, 1974, and was given the designation Pub. L. 93–651. Therefore, for purposes of codification, this section should be deemed to have been enacted by Pub. L. 93–651, title II, §209, Nov. 21, 1974, 89 Stat. 2–15, in exactly the same manner as it was enacted by Pub. L. 93–516.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. The comma probably should be a semicolon.