alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.54

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.54

 360.52

 360.54

 360.52

 360.54

 360.54

 360.54

 360.52

 360.54

 360.55

 360.52

 360.52

 360.54

 360.54

 360.55

 360.55

 360.55

 360.55

 360.55

 575

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 575

 573

 575

 573

 575

 575

 575

 573

 575

 576

 573

 573

 575

 575

 576

 576

 576

 576

 576

STORAGE

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+2

-2

+2

+0

+0

-2

+2

+1

-3

+0

+2

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 496

 496

 477

 421

 406

 453

 453

 452

 405

 451

 401

 435

 490

 479

 462

 461

 446

 386

 377

 387

 380

 496

 436

 466

 473

 377

 451

 441

 451

 462

 472

 1,505

 1,505

 1,503

 1,502

 1,501

 1,502

 1,502

 1,504

 1,503

 1,502

 1,503

 1,506

 1,502

 1,503

 1,501

 1,500

 1,502

 1,503

 1,501

 1,501

 1,502

 1,503

 1,501

 1,501

 1,501

 1,502

 1,500

 1,502

 1,503

 1,502

 1,500

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2021

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1 0 46,568 13,739

ACRE-FEET +1 0 92,368 27,251

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 55,484

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 27,251

 175,103

 575

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 3,145

 3,159

 3,124

 3,017

 2,984

 3,048

 2,995

 3,038

 3,032

 3,122

 3,051

 3,105

 3,180

 3,170

 3,125

 3,136

 3,127

 2,998

 2,985

 2,940

 2,948

 3,072

 3,064

 3,154

 3,160

 3,059

 3,085

 3,056

 3,084

 3,116

 3,120

 95,399

 189,224

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 92,368

 92

 924

 925

 905

 866

 867

 838

 835

 876

 920

 894

 933

 976

 977

 953

 973

 989

 917

 912

 865

 893

 912

 959

 991

 991

 992

 957

 936

 958

 976

 971

 27,973

 55,484

RIVER CANALS
Meeting Summary Meeting with Procter & Gamble to Discuss Pelargonic Acid, Salts & Esters Registration Review Summary Document November 30, 2010; 2:00 PM to 3:30 PM Room S-8671, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Participants

Procter & Gamble: Mario Green, Don Versteeg, Jan Dhonau, Pat Quinn

EPA: Eliza Blair (AD), Tim McMahon (AD), Jenny Tao (AD), Lance Wormell (AD), Mark Hartman (AD), Jonathan Chen (AD), Srinivas Gowda (AD), Nathan Mottl (AD)

Summary

Agency toxicologists and registration review team members met with NOBS registrant Procter & Gamble to discuss the Nonanoic acid, sulfophenyl ester, sodium salt (NOBS) portion of the recently issued Pela rgonic Acid, Salts & Esters Registration Review Summary Document (case 6077). The regi strant wished to cl arify the reason why some studies previously submitted to support this chemical were deemed unacceptable.

Based on the meeting, the Agency intends to send the registrant more study reviews clarifying the Agency’s reasons fo r not accepting the studies. Additionally, the registrant intends to submit further inform ation in response to the upcoming NOBS data call-in to support and upgrade some toxicology studies. The registrant will also submit additional ecological studies.

Once received, the Agency will review the information and decide which alreadysubmitted studies can be upgraded and accepted and which will still be required for the

data call-in.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 305

 303

 301

 302

 298

 304

 304

 305

 310

 311

 329

 329

 328

 318

 321

 321

 316

 315

 313

 316

 318

 318

 318

 326

 338

 340

 345

 348

 337

 345

 289

 287

 288

 286

 287

 286

 288

 290

 285

 289

 292

 300

 302

 300

 295

 292

 291

 298

 297

 290

 290

 287

 288

 282

 285

 284

 287

 297

 295

 289

 296

 294

 294

 293

 294

 295

 296

 297

 296

 298

 303

 308

 310

 308

 306

 305

 304

 305

 305

 303

 301

 300

 299

 300

 306

 306

 310

 317

 311

 312

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
### §3431. Term of court; power of court unaffected by expiration—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Expiration of term without significance in criminal cases, Rule 45(c).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 45(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in text, was rescinded Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966.
#### § 24.45 Use on returns.

The employer identification number (as defined at 26 CFR 301.7701-12) of the taxpayer who has been assigned such a number will be shown on each return filed pursuant to the provisions of this part, including amended returns. Failure of the taxpayer to include the employer identification number on any return filed pursuant to the provisions of this part may result in the assertion and collection of the penalty prescribed in 27 CFR 70.113 of this chapter. (Pub. L. 87-397, 75 Stat. 828, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6109, 6676))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-301, 55 FR 47605, Nov. 14, 1990]
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.214 Notice and claim, Form 5120.24.

Claim for allowance of drawback of internal revenue taxes on wines removed under the provisions of § 28.211 and § 28.212, shall be prepared by the exporter on Form 5120.24, in quadruplicate: *Provided,* That where the withdrawal is for use on aircraft, an extra copy, marked “Consignee's Copy”, shall be prepared. Each Form 5120.24 shall be given, by the exporter, a serial number beginning with “1” for the first day of January of each year and running consecutively thereafter to December 31, inclusive.

(46 Stat. 690, as amended, 72 Stat. 1336; 19 U.S.C. 1309, 26 U.S.C. 5062)

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3833, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 178 155 163

2 172 151 160

3 175 150 160

4 173 147 157

5 167 144 154

6 168 138 152

7 168 140 151

8 172 138 150

9 162 136 146

10 157 138 144

11 150 133 142

12 147 131 140

13 146 131 138

14 146 129 137

15 145 131 138

16 152 131 139

17 146 130 138

18 144 129 138

19 141 126 136

20 154 132 140

21 174 134 152

22 169 127 150

23 154 136 142

24 161 136 143

25 163 134 143

26 188 135 153

27 197 144 177

28 206 160 188

29 223 134 189

30 216 158 179

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Farrar Park At Dutch Slough 

Period: June 2023 Run Date: 7/10/2023
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.162 Suspension and revocation of permit.

Where the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that an export warehouse proprietor has not in good faith complied with the provisions of 26 U.S.C. chapter 52, and regulations thereunder, or with any other provision of 26 U.S.C. with intent to defraud, or has violated any condition of his permit, or has failed to disclose any material information required or made any material false statement in the application for permit, or has failed to maintain his premises in such manner as to protect the revenue, or is, by reason of previous or current legal proceedings involving a felony violation of any other provision of Federal criminal law relating to tobacco products, processed tobacco, cigarette paper, or cigarette tubes, not likely to maintain operations in compliance with 26 U.S.C. chapter 52, or has been convicted of a felony violation of any provision of Federal or State criminal law relating to tobacco products, processed tobacco, cigarette paper, or cigarette tubes, the appropriate TTB officer shall issue an order, stating the facts charged, citing such export warehouse proprietor to show cause why the permit should not be suspended or revoked after hearing thereon in accordance with part 71 of this chapter, which part (including the provisions relating to appeals) is made applicable to such proceedings. If, after hearing, the hearing examiner, or on appeal, the Administrator, finds that such person has not shown cause why the permit should not be suspended or revoked, such permit shall be suspended for such period as the appropriate TTB officer deems proper or shall be revoked.

(72 Stat. 1421; 26 U.S.C. 5713)

[T.D. TTB-75, 74 FR 14485, Mar. 31, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.300 Retention and preservation of records. ( a ) *Place of maintenance.* Records required by this part will be prepared and kept by the brewer at the brewery where the operation or transaction occurs and will be available for inspection by any appropriate TTB officer during business hours.
( b ) *Reproduction of original records.* Whenever any record, because of its condition, becomes unsuitable for its intended or continued use, the brewer shall reproduce the record by a process under § 25.301. The reproduced record will be treated and considered for all purposes as though it were the original record, and all provisions of law applicable to the original are applicable to the reproduction.
( c ) *Retention of records.* Records required by this part will be preserved for a period of not less than three years from the date thereof or the date of the last entry required to be made thereon, whichever is later. The appropriate TTB officer may require records to be kept for an additional period not exceeding three years in any case where such retention is deemed necessary or advisable for the protection of the revenue.
( d ) *Data Processing.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, record data maintained on data processing equipment may be kept at a location other than the brewery if the original transaction (source) records required by §§ 25.292-25.298 are kept available for inspection at the brewery.
( 2 ) Data which has been accumulated on cards, tapes, discs, or other accepted record media will be retrievable within five business days.
( 3 ) The applicable data processing program will be made available for examination if requested by an appropriate TTB officer.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1390, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5415))
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO ss.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Roger G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 14, 2006             By: /s/ Roger G. Little
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Roger G. Little
                                         Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                         Officer and President



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.286 Receipt in customs bonded warehouse.

On receipt of the distilled spirits or wine and the related TTB Form 5100.11 or 5110.30 as the case may be, the customs officer in charge of the customs bonded warehouse shall make such inspection as is necessary to establish to his satisfaction that the shipment corresponds with the description thereof on the appropriate form. The customs officer shall note on each copy of the Form 5100.11 or 5110.30, as the case may be, any deficiency in quantity or discrepancy between the merchandise inspected and that described on the form. Where the inspection discloses no loss, or where a loss is disclosed and there is no evidence to indicate fraud, the officer shall execute his certificate of deposit on both copies of the form, forward the original as required by the instructions on the form, and retain the remaining copy for his files.

(Sec. 3(a), Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965 (26 U.S.C. 5066); sec. 2, Pub. L. 96-601, 94 Stat. 3495 (26 U.S.C. 5362))

[T.D. ATF-88, 46 FR 39816, Aug. 5, 1981, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan. 27, 2004]
Category (section) Status Last Revised

Thallium (I),soluble salts

Source Documents

• Thallium (I), soluble salts

Summary

• Toxicological Review of

Thallium (I), soluble salts (PDF)

(165 Pages, 1.00 M, about PDF)

Revision History

Date Section Description

09/30/2009 All IRIS

Summaries

for five

thallium

soluble salts

combined

into a single

Summary.

RfD, RfC,

and cancer

sections

updated.

RfD

removed.

• See IRIS Summary for

complete revision history.

You are here: EPA Home Research Environmental Assessment IRIS Home Thallium

(I), soluble salts Quickview (CASRN Various)

Thallium (I),soluble salts Quickview (CASRN

Various)

Health assessment information on a chemical

substance is included in IRIS only after a

comprehensive review of toxicity data by U.S. EPA

health scientists from several Program Offices,

Regional Offices, and the Office of Research and

Development.

Disclaimer: This QuickView represents a snapshot

of key information. We suggest that you read the

IRIS Summary to put this information into complete

context.

For definitions of terms in the IRIS Web site,

refer to the IRIS Glossary.

Status of Data for Thallium (I),soluble salts

File First On-Line: 01/31/1987;Last Significant

Revision: 09/30/2009

Oral RfD Assessment Discussion 09/30/2009

Inhalation RfC Assessment Discussion 09/30/2009

Carcinogenicity Assessment Yes 09/30/2009

Synonyms

• Thallium acetate

• Thallium (I) acetate

• Dithallium

carbonate

• Thallium carbonate

• Thallium chloride

• Thallium (I)

chloride

• Thallium nitrate

• Thallium (I) nitrate

• Thallium sulfate

• Dithallium sulfate

• Thallium (I), soluble

salts

• more...

Chronic Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects

Reference Dose for Chronic Oral Exposure (RfD)

Information reviewed but value not estimated. See IRIS Summary.

Reference Concentration for Chronic Inhalation Exposure (RfC)

Information reviewed but value not estimated. See IRIS Summary.

Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure

• Weight-of-Evidence Characterization

Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)

Thallium (I),solublesaltsQuickview (CASRN Various)|IRIS|USEPA Page1of2

https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showQuickView&substance_n... 4/4/2016
• Inadequate information to assess carcinogenic potential

• Weight-of-Evidence Narrative:

• Under the Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 2005a), the database

for thallium and compounds provides "inadequate information to assess carcinogenic

potential."

• This may be a synopsis of the full weight-of-evidence narrative. See IRIS Summary.

Quantitative Estimate of Carcinogenic Riskfrom Oral Exposure

• Not Assessed under the IRIS Program.

Quantitative Estimate of Carcinogenic Riskfrom Inhalation Exposure

• Not Assessed under the IRIS Program.

Thallium (I),solublesaltsQuickview (CASRN Various)|IRIS|USEPA Page2of2

https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm?fuseaction=iris.showQuickView&substance_n... 4/4/2016
§ 19.306 Entry. ( a ) Following completion of the production gauge, a proprietor must make the appropriate entry for: ( 1 ) Deposit of the spirits on bonded premises for storage or processing;
( 2 ) Withdrawal of the spirits on determination of tax;
( 3 ) Withdrawal of the spirits free of tax;
( 4 ) Withdrawal of the spirits without payment of tax; or
( 5 ) Transfer of the spirits for redistillation.
( b ) A proprietor may use the production gauge as the entry gauge when spirits are: ( 1 ) Deposited for storage or processing at the same distilled spirits plant; or
( 2 ) Entered for redistillation at the same distilled spirits plant.
( c ) When spirits are entered for deposit at another distilled spirits plant or are entered for withdrawal or redistillation, the provisions subpart P of this part will apply.
(26 U.S.C. 5211)
September 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER JUDGE (2)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET

(1)

FRANCIS CARR

POWER PLANT C. F. S. INCHES

13.815

1 1,901.02 13.926 111 1,077 53 249 146 571 2 0.09

2 1,901.09 13.978 52 1,109 0 237 199 647 0 0.00

3 1,900.72 13.705 -273 1,012 0 235 199 713 3 0.14

4 1,900.88 13.823 118 1,084 0 236 199 588 2 0.11

5 1,900.56 13.587 -236 1,044 26 252 173 710 2 0.11

6 1,901.06 13.956 369 1,148 110 270 89 489 4 0.18

7 1,900.99 13.904 -52 927 110 270 89 481 3 0.15

8 1,900.86 13.808 -96 907 110 270 89 481 5 0.22

9 1,900.50 13.543 -265 892 110 268 89 555 4 0.19

10 1,900.51 13.550 7 1,096 110 269 89 619 5 0.22

11 1,900.36 13.440 -110 1,122 110 269 89 705 4 0.19

12 1,900.41 13.477 37 959 110 264 89 473 4 0.18

13 1,900.48 13.528 51 1,566 110 254 89 1,083 4 0.19

14 1,900.53 13.565 37 1,570 110 249 89 1,099 4 0.19

15 1,900.46 13.514 -51 1,321 110 227 112 894 4 0.19

16 1,900.48 13.528 14 1,369 110 163 174 911 4 0.19

17 1,900.37 13.447 -81 1,589 110 160 174 1,182 4 0.17

18 1,900.47 13.521 74 1,616 64 293 102 1,116 4 0.20

19 1,900.47 13.521 0 1,576 0 470 0 1,102 4 0.17

20 1,900.58 13.602 81 1,501 0 459 0 998 3 0.16

21 1,900.58 13.602 0 1,573 0 459 0 1,110 4 0.17

22 1,900.59 13.609 7 1,543 0 454 0 1,082 3 0.15

23 1,900.58 13.602 -7 1,554 0 447 0 1,106 5 0.21

24 1,900.59 13.609 7 1,543 0 447 0 1,088 4 0.20

25 1,900.71 13.698 89 1,598 0 448 0 1,102 3 0.12

26 1,900.74 13.720 22 1,540 0 448 0 1,079 2 0.08

27 1,900.78 13.749 29 1,090 0 453 0 620 2 0.08

28 1,901.38 14.195 446 1,425 0 456 0 742 2 0.11

29 1,900.17 13.300 -895 611 0 448 0 611 3 0.14

30 1,900.79 13.756 456 1,327 0 449 0 648 0 0.02

TOTALS -59 38,289 1,463 9,873 2,279 24,605 97 4.52

ACRE-FEET -59 75,946 2,902 19,583 4,520 48,804 192

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE. (2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Total Power 2,902 Judge Francis Carr Powerplant 48,804

Total River 27,005 Total Release 75,811

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lewiston Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 10/10/2023
#### Rosario Zuco et al., Appellants, v. Isidore Funt et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a now trial, with costs to appellants to abide the event, with the following memorandum: As plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed at the close of the case, they are entitled to the most favorable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence. Applying that test, the jury could have found that the steel workers were permitted to erect steel columns to support the sixth floor before the fifth floor had been planked over, as required by subdivision 4 of section 241 of the Labor Law. This statutory duty is absolute and nondelegable. Every owner and general contractor who fails to perform it is guilty of negligence as a matter of law where, as here, a causal connection is established between the failure to perform the duty and the accident causing the injury. In addition, the owner of a building under construction, acting as general contractor, is under a duty to an employee of a subcontractor to use reasonable care to furnish such employee with a reasonably safe place to work. *(Caspersen*v. *La Sala Bros.,*253 N. Y. 491; *Hooey*v. *Airport Construction Co.,*253 N. Y. 486.)