alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Pedro CASTILLO-HIDALGO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-50025.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Scott M. Gar-ringer, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Davina T. Chen, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed the record and the opening brief. We conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insub*560stantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The United States Supreme Court’s decision in *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding. Further, we upheld the identical condition of supervised release challenged here in *United States v. Rodriguez-Rodñguez,*441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir.2006).

Accordingly, the government’s motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8427]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2005-TX-0013; FRL-9290-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; System 
Cap Trading Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 18, 2010 (75 FR 70654), EPA published a proposed 
rule to disapprove severable portions of two revisions to the Texas 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Texas on May 
1, 2001, and August 16, 2007, that create and amend the System Cap 
Trading (SCT) Program at Title 30 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 
101--General Air Quality, Subchapter H--Emissions Banking and Trading, 
Division 5, sections 101.380, 101.382, 101.383, and 101.385. We 
proposed disapproval because the SCT Program lacks several necessary 
components for emissions trading programs as outlined in EPA's Economic 
Incentive Program Guidance. Subsequent to our proposed disapproval, EPA 
received a letter dated March 4, 2011, from the Texas Commission on 
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) stating that the May 1, 2001, and August 
16, 2007, SCT Program SIP submissions have been withdrawn from our 
consideration as revisions to the Texas SIP. Therefore, EPA is 
withdrawing our proposed disapproval and finds that no further action 
is necessary on the SCT Program. The State's action also withdraws from 
EPA's review the SCT Program component of the January 22, 2010 Consent 
Decree between EPA and the BCCA Appeal Group, Texas Association of 
Business, and Texas Oil and Gas Association. This withdrawal is being 
taken under section 110 and parts C and D of the Federal Clean Air Act.

DATES: The proposed rule published on November 18, 2010 (75 FR 70654), 
is withdrawn as of April 8, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits 
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue 
(6PD-R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. The telephone number is 
(214) 665-2115. Ms. Wiley can also be reached via electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37405e5b524e1956535e59567752475619505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a0d13161f03541b1e13141b3a1f0a1b541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011-8427 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.14
 VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
2011 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 1.  Purpose of the Plan
  2.  Definitions
  Act
 Affiliate
 Award
 Blackstone
 Board
 Change in Control
  Corporate
Transaction




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Company
 Effective Date
 Employment Employment
 Fair Market Value
 2




---



##### 



ISO
 Option
 Option Price
 Other Stock-Based Awards
 Participant
 Performance-Based Awards
 Permitted Holder
 Person
 Plan
 Public Trading Date
 Service Recipient
 Shares
 Stock Appreciation Right
 Subsidiary
 3




---



##### 



3.  Shares Subject to the Plan
 Generally
 Prior Plans 2004 Stock Plan 2004 Unit Plan VHS LLC Agreement
 4.  Administration
 Non-Employee Directors provided that
 4




---



##### 



5.  Limitations
  6.  Options
  5




---



##### 



Option Price
 Exercisability
 Exercise of Options
 ISOs ISOs
 6




---



##### 



provided
 Attestation
 Repricing of Options
 7.  Stock Appreciation Rights
 Grants
 Terms provided however
 7




---



##### 



provided
 Limitations
 Repricing of Stock Appreciation Rights
 8.  Other Stock-Based Awards
 Other Stock-Based Awards
 8




---



##### 



9.  Performance-Based Awards.
 Performance-Based Awards
  9




---



##### 



10. Adjustments Upon Certain Events
  Generally
 10




---



##### 



Change in Control
 11. No Right to Employment or Awards
  12. Securities Laws
  11




---



##### 



13. Successors and Assigns
  14. Nontransferability of Awards
  15. Amendments or Termination
 provided however
  16. Choice of Law
  12




---



##### 



17. Effectiveness of the Plan
  18. Section 409A of the Code
  provided
 13




---



##### 



19. Awards Subject to the Plan
  20. Severability
  14
### Part III—Adjustment Assistance to Workers
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 356

 366

 389

 405

 422

 438

 454

 463

 468

 476

 484

 480

 460

 468

 476

 502

 520

 528

 551

 560

 578

 585

 594

 600

 618

 587

 616

 638

 652

 651

 286

 297

 296

 312

 323

 328

 338

 348

 355

 362

 368

 364

 352

 366

 360

 381

 382

 404

 397

 398

 413

 410

 424

 431

 447

 437

 464

 471

 506

 476

 314

 322

 333

 346

 358

 373

 381

 397

 411

 411

 418

 416

 403

 396

 404

 418

 430

 439

 447

 455

 464

 472

 488

 502

 509

 501

 515

 532

 555

 560

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.77

 360.77

 360.76

 360.76

 361.45

 361.45

 361.43

 361.42

 361.42

 361.43

 361.43

 360.73

 360.15

 360.15

 360.14

 360.14

 360.15

 360.17

 360.15

 360.15

 360.15

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 591

 591

 590

 590

 639

 639

 637

 636

 636

 637

 637

 588

 548

 548

 547

 547

 548

 549

 548

 548

 548

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

STORAGE

+51

+0

-1

+0

+49

+0

-2

-1

+0

+1

+0

-49

-40

+0

-1

+0

+1

+1

-1

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,693

 2,041

 2,016

 2,016

 3,275

 4,039

 4,023

 4,009

 4,008

 4,019

 4,009

 3,348

 1,320

 803

 803

 803

 803

 805

 805

 801

 801

 806

 805

 803

 802

 803

 803

 802

 804

 804

 805

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2020

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +9 0 54,277 0

ACRE-FEET +9 0 107,658 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 0

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 107,658

 540

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,717

 2,010

 2,009

 2,006

 3,263

 3,974

 3,950

 3,935

 3,940

 3,950

 3,949

 3,280

 1,311

 822

 823

 823

 824

 826

 826

 823

 822

 822

 822

 823

 822

 822

 822

 823

 826

 825

 826

 54,116

 107,339

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 107,658

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

RIVER CANALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 450.39

 450.30

 450.24

 450.17

 449.73

 449.46

 449.30

 449.09

 449.56

 449.34

 449.28

 449.24

 449.42

 449.42

 449.39

 449.70

 449.97

 450.15

 450.31

 450.49

 450.67

 449.81

 449.64

 449.59

 449.67

 449.78

 449.88

 449.96

 450.06

 450.16

 976,139

 975,245

 974,650

 973,955

 969,593

 966,920

 965,337

 963,260

 967,910

 965,732

 965,139

 964,743

 966,524

 966,524

 966,227

 969,296

 971,972

 973,757

 975,345

 977,132

 978,920

 970,386

 968,702

 968,207

 968,999

 970,089

 971,080

 971,873

 972,864

 973,856

 3,174

 1,546

 0

 0

 0

 2,336

 2,336

 2,335

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,105

 0

 0

 4,071

 3,378

 2,330

 2,327

 2,321

 2,323

 3,004

 0

 0

 1,763

 1,763

 1,410

 1,407

 1,408

 1,405

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL November 30, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2020 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -397 0 9,133 113,745

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 1,886

-894

-595

-695

-4,362

-2,673

-1,583

-2,077

 4,650

-2,178

-593

-396

 1,781

 0

-297

 3,069

 2,676

 1,785

 1,588

 1,787

 1,788

-8,534

-1,684

-495

 792

 1,090

 991

 793

 991

 992

 365

 333

 365

 374

 384

 344

 359

 355

 339

 326

 323

 336

 280

 335

 330

 342

 316

 307

 313

 275

 259

 244

 241

 243

 243

 257

 244

 243

 226

 232

4,015

5,143

3,832

3,782

-340

4,043

2,103

1,981

8,259

4,853

3,556

3,637

3,692

4,316

4,133

5,937

3,914

5,407

5,313

5,420

5,430

-380

2,154

2,144

3,692

3,819

4,442

4,240

2,106

3,102

ELEV STORAGE

 43,742

 253,018

 258,161

 261,993

 265,775

 265,435

 269,478

 271,581

 273,562

 281,821

 286,674

 290,230

 293,867

 297,559

 301,875

 306,008

 311,945

 315,859

 321,266

 326,579

 331,999

 337,429

 337,049

 339,203

 341,347

 345,039

 348,858

 353,300

 357,540

 359,646

 362,748

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 249,003

1,600

4,000

4,300

4,300

0

2,000

0

0

5,200

5,200

4,000

4,000

1,350

4,500

4,800

2,500

1,000

3,500

3,500

3,500

3,500

0

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

3,343

3,232

1,000

2,000

82,325
(Case No. 00124

#### In Re Application of Eva Mae Craggs.

*Opinion filed July 25, 1978.*

William H. Knuppel, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Vincent J. Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim arising out of the death of an officer allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et seq., 1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at hearings before the full Court on November 8, 1977 and March 15,1978, and reviewed on June 15,1978, the Court finds that:

1. The Claimant, Eva Mae Graggs, is the widow of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in the application for benefits;

2. The decedent, George D. Craggs, was a corporal, employed by the Illinois State Police and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act, on November 6,1977. He *1036was 51 years of age;

3. On said date, at approximately 9:45 a.m., during regularly assigned duty hours, Corporal Craggs was stricken with a heart attack while issuing a traffic citation to a motorist; this traffic citation was the fifth citation by Corporal Craggs during a state police airplane to ground traffic surveillance that began at 8:00 a.m. said date. After being stricken, Officer Craggs was taken to a hospital in Havana; and, thereafter, he was transported to, and treated in, St. Francis Hospital and Methodist Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois. He died at Methodist Medical Center on November 10, 1977, after surgery. The medical certificate of death recited the cause of death as “cardiac arrest secondary to acute myocardial infarction and rupture of the interventricular septum.” The evidence presented indicates that Corporal Gragg’s death was caused and precipitated by his active performance of the duties required by him as a law enforcement officer for the State of Illinois;

4. Corporal Craggs was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act;

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $20,000.00 be awarded to Eva Mae Craggs, as widow and designated beneficiary of the deceased officer, George D. Craggs.
#### President and Directors of Manhattan Company, Respondent, v. B. L. M. Holding Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of McDATA Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John A. Kelley,Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated: June 9, 2003 | /s/ JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.               |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                | John A. Kelley, Jr.                   |
|                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 13.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     By:
    /s/ Limin LiName:
    Limin LiTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 1
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-54783, 33-54789, 33-61471, 33-61473, 33-119149 and 33-126616on Form S-8, of our report dated April 12, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Gottschalks Inc., andmanagement's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gottschalks Incfor the year ended February 3, 2007.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Francisco, California
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 500.71

 502.31

 503.46

 504.42

 505.51

 507.17

 507.78

 508.57

 509.29

 509.80

 510.45

 511.08

 512.39

 513.12

 514.01

 515.35

 516.43

 517.08

 517.91

 519.19

 519.86

 520.84

 522.03

 523.06

 523.69

 524.31

 525.78

 526.27

 526.81

 1,515,834

 1,534,261

 1,547,553

 1,558,678

 1,571,343

 1,590,698

 1,597,831

 1,607,084

 1,615,534

 1,621,528

 1,629,179

 1,636,606

 1,652,087

 1,660,736

 1,671,301

 1,687,251

 1,700,145

 1,707,921

 1,717,868

 1,733,248

 1,741,317

 1,753,143

 1,767,540

 1,780,034

 1,787,690

 1,795,237

 1,813,173

 1,819,166

 1,825,778

 3,744

 5,141

 5,263

 5,015

 7,054

 13,873

 4,294

 5,176

 4,058

 2,964

 3,129

 3,746

 7,048

 2,862

 3,809

 6,389

 4,117

 4,753

 4,156

 6,204

 3,713

 4,647

 11,995

 13,772

 9,098

 8,769

 20,798

 8,017

 7,879

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL April 24, 2000

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2000 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 320,506 0 5,403 177,758

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 10,562

 18,427

 13,292

 11,125

 12,665

 19,355

 7,133

 9,253

 8,450

 5,994

 7,651

 7,427

 15,481

 8,649

 10,565

 15,950

 12,894

 7,776

 9,947

 15,380

 8,069

 11,826

 14,397

 12,494

 7,656

 7,547

 17,936

 5,993

 6,612

 221

 182

 208

 210

 220

 209

 214

 211

 186

 283

 210

 177

 171

 176

 189

 162

 159

 181

 184

 178

 170

 185

 165

 143

 161

 156

 163

 181

 148

3,748

4,462

4,225

4,506

6,588

13,215

3,763

4,630

3,660

2,490

2,878

3,232

7,207

2,727

3,460

5,863

3,594

4,199

3,699

5,684

3,143

4,502

11,785

13,128

8,520

8,261

19,803

7,296

7,490

ELEV STORAGE

 191,483

 593,694

 598,156

 602,381

 606,887

 613,475

 626,690

 630,453

 635,083

 638,743

 641,233

 644,111

 647,343

 654,550

 657,277

 660,737

 666,600

 670,194

 674,393

 678,092

 683,776

 686,919

 691,421

 703,206

 716,334

 724,854

 733,115

 752,918

 760,214

 767,704

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 589,946

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
§ 81.36 Compromise of claims under General Education Provisions Act. ( a ) The Secretary or an authorized Departmental official as appropriate may compromise a claim established under this subpart without following the procedures in 4 CFR part 103 if— ( 1 ) ( i ) The amount of the claim does not exceed $200,000; or
( ii ) The difference between the amount of the claim and the amount agreed to be returned does not exceed $200,000; and
( 2 ) The Secretary or the official determines that— ( i ) The collection of the amount by which the claim is reduced under the compromise would not be practical or in the public interest; and
( ii ) The practice that resulted in the disallowance decision has been corrected and will not recur.
( b ) Not less than 45 days before compromising a claim under this section, the Department publishes a notice in the Federal Register stating— ( 1 ) The intention to compromise the claim; and
( 2 ) That interested persons may comment on the proposed compromise.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1234(f)(1), 1234a (j), and 3474(a))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989. Redesignated at 58 FR 43473, Aug. 16, 1993]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 374.65

 374.28

 373.92

 373.52

 373.05

 372.63

 372.36

 372.24

 371.85

 371.52

 371.18

 370.88

 370.55

 370.16

 369.80

 369.58

 369.14

 368.74

 368.36

 367.98

 367.67

 367.34

 366.88

 366.45

 365.92

 365.38

 364.94

 364.62

 364.38

 364.02

 363.68

 234.4

 232.6

 230.9

 229.0

 226.8

 224.9

 223.6

 223.1

 221.3

 219.8

 218.2

 216.9

 215.4

 213.7

 212.1

 211.1

 209.2

 207.5

 205.9

 204.2

 202.9

 201.6

 199.6

 197.9

 195.7

 193.5

 191.8

 190.5

 189.6

 188.1

 186.8

STORAGE

-1.3

-1.8

-1.7

-1.9

-2.2

-1.9

-1.2

-0.6

-1.8

-1.5

-1.5

-1.4

-1.5

-1.7

-1.6

-1.0

-1.9

-1.7

-1.6

-1.6

-1.3

-1.4

-1.9

-1.8

-2.2

-2.2

-1.8

-1.3

-0.9

-1.4

-1.3

CHANGE

743

531

398

656

539

568

701

714

437

465

561

763

776

714

706

655

438

411

376

529

656

583

364

352

283

320

431

600

634

360

393

INFLOW

 1,286

 1,321

 1,167

 1,506

 1,561

 1,452

 1,240

 913

 1,260

 1,140

 1,256

 1,361

 1,429

 1,517

 1,422

 1,055

 1,322

 1,195

 1,114

 1,270

 1,233

 1,197

 1,237

 1,144

 1,282

 1,328

 1,235

 1,154

 1,016

 978

 965

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 100

 92

 86

 85

 86

 88

 83

 76

 74

 76

 78

 77

 76

 69

 78

 77

 81

 82

 79

 76

 75

 79

 87

 91

 88

 81

 78

 78

 86

 91

 85

PUMPING

 8

 9

 9

 12

 5

 8

 6

 4

 4

 4

 4

 6

 12

 4

 6

 7

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 5

 7

 7

 7

 5

 7

 4

 8

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .03

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .08

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2013 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -48.9 16,657 38,556 0 0 2,538 187 1.32 .39

ACRE-FEET -48,900 33,039 76,476 0 0 5,034 371

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 76,476

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 5,034

TOTAL 81,510

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE = 2.26

 235.7

OUTLET 0 .39