alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimizing Facility Configurations and Operating Conditions for Improved Performance in the NASA Ames 24 Inch Shock TubeThe Ames Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) is a shock tube wherein the driver gas can be heated by an electric arc discharge. The electrical energy is stored in a 1.2 MJ capacitor bank. Four inch and 24 inch diameter driven tubes are available. The facility is described and the need for testing in the 24 inch tube to better simulate low density NASA mission profiles is discussed. Three test entries, 53, 53B and 59, are discussed. Tests are done with air or Mars gas (95.7% CO2/2.7% N2/1.6% Ar) at pressures of 0.01 to 0.14 Torr. Velocities spanned 6.3-9.2 km/s, with a nominal center of 7 km/s. Many facility configurations are studied in an effort to improve data quality. Various driver and driven tube configurations and the use of a buffer section between the driver and the driven tube are studied. Diagnostics include test times, time histories of the shock light pulses and tilts of the shock wave off the plane normal to the tube axis. The report will detail the results of the various trials, give the best configuration/operating conditions found to date and provide recommendations for further improvements. Finally, diaphragm performance is discussed.Document ID20160011949Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBogdanoff, David W.*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Cruden, Brett A.*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 4, 2016Publication DateAugust 1, 2016Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN34944NASA/TM-2016-219164Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA15BB15CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsShock TubeRadiation measurementsOptimize facilityAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011949.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-8316 on Forms S-8 and S-3,  Amendment  No. 1 to  Registration  Statement  No.
333-813 on Form S-3, and in  Registration  Statements Nos.  33-20226,  33-23699,
33-33571,  33-41330,  33-81914  and  333-04041  on Forms S-8 of our report dated
February 28, 1997 on the consolidated financial statements and related financial
statement  schedule of  Sigma Designs,  Inc.  appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 1997.


San Jose, California
April 30, 1997
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ethel Merriman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Future Carz, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          Effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 19, 2003

/s/ Ethel Merriman
-----------------------------
President, CEO, and
Principal Financial Officer
§ 19.172 Relief of surety from bond liability. A surety that has provided proper notice under § 19.171 will be relieved from liability under the bond in question as set forth below: ( a ) *Operations or unit bond.* When a superseding bond is submitted, the surety will be relieved of future liability related to production and deposits that take place after the effective date of the superseding bond. However, the surety remains liable for the tax on all distilled spirits or wines produced, or for other liabilities incurred, during the term of the bond. Further, if a superseding bond is not submitted, the surety will remain liable under the bond for all spirits or wines that are on hand or in transit to the bonded premises or bonded wine cellar on the date specified in the notice. The liability of the surety will continue until all such spirits or wines have been lawfully disposed of, or until a new bond has been submitted by the principal covering the spirits or wine.
( b ) *Withdrawal or unit bonds.* The surety will be relieved from liability for withdrawals made after the date specified in the notice, or upon the effective date of a new bond if one is given.
(26 U.S.C. 5173, 5176)
| NAME                                              | JURISDICTION        |
|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                              |                |
| CopperGate      Communications Ltd.               | Israel              |
| Sigma      Designs (Asia), Ltd.                   | Hong      Kong      |
| Sigma      Designs Europe                         | France              |
| Sigma      Designs Japan, KK                      | Japan               |
| Sigma      Designs Technologies Canada, Inc.      | Canada              |
| Sigma      Designs Technology Singapore Pte. Ltd. | Singapore           |
| Sigma      International Limited                  | Cayman      Islands |
| Zensys      Holdings Corporation                  | Delaware            |
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.77 Formula No. 40-C. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: Three gallons of *tert*-butyl alcohol.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 111. Hair and scalp preparations. 112. Bay rum. 113. Lotions and creams (hand, face, and body). 114. Deodorants (body). 121. Perfumes and perfume tinctures. 122. Toilet waters and colognes. 141. Shampoos. 142. Soaps and bath preparations. 210. External pharmaceuticals, not U.S.P. or N.F. 410. Disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and other biocides. 450. Cleaning solutions (including household detergents). 470. Theater sprays, incense, and room deodorants. 485. Miscellaneous solutions.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses. 812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
( c ) *Conditions governing use.* This formula shall be used only in the manufacture of products which will be packaged in pressurized containers in which the liquid contents are in intimate contact with the propellant and from which the contents are not easily removable in liquid form.
### SUBCHAPTER III—LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION FOR ENGLISH LEARNERS AND IMMIGRANT STUDENTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 114–95, title III, §3001(1), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1953, substituted "ENGLISH LEARNERS" for "LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT" in subchapter heading.

Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted as part of Pub. L. 89–10, Apr. 11, 1965, 79 Stat. 27, amended, and subsequently revised, restated, and amended by other public laws. Title III is shown, herein, as having been added by Pub. L. 107–110, title III, §301, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1689, without reference to earlier amendments because of the extensive revision of the title's provisions by Pub. L. 107–110. See Codification note preceding section 6301 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Number 33-24107) pertaining to the Seattle FilmWorks, Inc. Incentive
Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-36020)
pertaining to the Seattle FilmWorks, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-69530) pertaining to the Seattle
FilmWorks, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Number 33-81332 and 333-02431) pertaining to the Seattle
FilmWorks, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Amended
and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan of our report dated November 5, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Seattle
FilmWorks, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 25, 1999.


                                       /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Seattle, Washington
December 22, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### §§ 21.39-21.40 [Reserved]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Russell R. Roth
    
    
    
    Dated:
November 14, 2006Russell R. RothTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Bruce A. Shepard
    
    
    
    Dated: November 14, 2006Bruce A. ShepardTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
  26
### §4347. Training with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights

#### (a) Training

The Commissioner shall ensure that officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection are trained to effectively detect and identify merchandise destined for the United States that infringes intellectual property rights, including through the use of technologies identified under subsection (c).

#### (b) Consultation with private sector

The Commissioner shall consult with private sector entities to better identify opportunities for collaboration between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and such entities with respect to training for officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in enforcing intellectual property rights.

#### (c) Identification of new technologies

In consultation with private sector entities, the Commissioner shall identify—

(1) technologies with the cost-effective capability to detect and identify merchandise at United States ports of entry that infringes intellectual property rights; and

(2) cost-effective programs for training officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use such technologies.

#### (d) Donations of technology

Not later than the date that is 180 days after February 24, 2016, the Commissioner shall prescribe regulations to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection to receive donations of hardware, software, equipment, and similar technologies, and to accept training and other support services, from private sector entities, for the purpose of enforcing intellectual property rights.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title III, §308, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 153.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.78 Change in premises.

Except as authorized in § 25.81, when the brewery is to be extended or curtailed, the brewer shall file an amended Form 5130.10. The additional facilities covered by the extension may not be used for the proposed purposes, and the portion to be curtailed may not be used for other than the previously approved purposes, prior to approval of Form 5130.10.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))
**EXHIBIT
      4**






**INSTRUMENTS
      DEFINING THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS, INCLUDING
      INDENTURES**






Exhibit
      4
      is:






Amended
      and Restated Rights Agreement dated December 16, 1996, which document is
      incorporated by reference to Form 8-A/A, Amendment No. 3 filed with the
      Commission on February 5, 1997.






Industrial
      Development Revenue Bonds dated April 1, 2001, maturing April 1,
      2021.






Industrial
      Development Revenue Bonds dated May 1, 1996, maturing May 1, 2016.






Amended
      and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2003, re:
      $50,000,000 5.36% Senior Secured Notes due November 30, 2009.






Note
      Purchase Agreement dated November 25, 2005, re: SGD 51,000,000 4.25% Senior
      Secured Notes due November 25, 2012.






The
      Company agrees to provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission, on request,
      copies of instruments defining the rights of security holders of long-term
      debt
      of the Company.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5449 

To amend the FAST Act to reauthorize the surface transportation system 

funding alternatives program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. LOWENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the FAST Act to reauthorize the surface transportation system funding alternatives program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Road User Charge Ad5 vancement Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FUNDING AL7 TERNATIVES. 

8 Section 6020 of the FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 503 note) 

9 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5449 IH

1 (1) in subsection (c) by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(6) To test solutions to ensure the privacy and 

4 security of data collected for the purpose of imple5 menting a user-based alternative revenue mecha6 nism.’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (g) by striking ‘‘50’’ and in8 serting ‘‘80’’; 

9 (3) in subsection (i)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘2 years after’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘1 year after’’; 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘every 2 years’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘annually’’; and 

14 (C) by inserting ‘‘and a determination of 

15 the characteristics of the most successful mech16 anisms with the highest potential for future 

17 widespread deployment’’ before the period; 

18 (4) in subsection (j)— 

19 (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

20 the end; 

21 (B) in paragraph (2) by striking the period 

22 at the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

23 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(3) $20,000,000 shall be used to carry out 

25 this section for fiscal year 2021; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5449 IH

1 ‘‘(4) $25,000,000 shall be used to carry out 

2 this section for fiscal year 2022; 

3 ‘‘(5) $25,000,000 shall be used to carry out 

4 this section for fiscal year 2023; 

5 ‘‘(6) $30,000,000 shall be used to carry out 

6 this section for fiscal year 2024; and 

7 ‘‘(7) $35,000,000 shall be used to carry out 

8 this section for fiscal year 2025.’’; and 

9 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(l) SPECIAL CONSIDERATION.—In selecting grant 

11 recipients under this section during fiscal years 2021 

12 through 2025, the Secretary shall provide special consider13 ation to proposed projects that— 

14 ‘‘(1) carry out activities not previously carried 

15 out by the applicant that advance the knowledge and 

16 practice of surface transportation system funding al17 ternatives; or 

18 ‘‘(2) collect revenue from pilot project partici19 pants.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 484

 499

 494

 489

 468

 449

 452

 467

 438

 432

 442

 679

 692

 693

 728

 740

 739

 816

 809

 811

 816

 857

 885

 892

 876

 869

 887

 924

 907

 916

 910

 388

 400

 374

 424

 358

 379

 368

 350

 303

 331

 275

 284

 574

 575

 610

 598

 600

 606

 621

 611

 628

 626

 636

 645

 644

 639

 687

 706

 700

 714

 718

 464

 463

 456

 457

 431

 422

 424

 408

 401

 394

 398

 501

 638

 648

 666

 665

 669

 701

 707

 717

 731

 751

 767

 764

 761

 758

 790

 799

 795

 797

 801

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
(Case No. 00137

#### In Re Application of Karen Koumoundouros.

*Opinion filed June 27, 1979.*

*1043Holderman, J.

Claimant in this matter is the widow of a police officer who was killed on September 7, 1977, while employed as a bank guard for the 1st National Bank of Lincoln wood, Lincolnwood, Illinois.

On October 23,1972, the deceased provided a beneficiary form in which Claimant’s widow was designated the sum of $5,000.00 and his two sons were designated the sum of $5,000.00. At the time the deceased provided the beneficiary form, the total benefit was $10,000.00 and provision was made for this amount.

On January 1, 1974, benefits to survivors (beneficiaries) were substantially increased from $10,000.00 to $20,000.00.

The deceased did not make any change in his beneficiary form and the question now before the Court is who is entitled to the additional $10,000.00 provided for by the increase in the death benefit.

In the amendment, effective August 31, 1976, Ch. 48, Sec. 283(a), the following language appears:

> “(a) When there is a surviving spouse, the entire sum shall be paid to the spouse. ..” .

The facts available show that Karen Koumoundouros is the surviving spouse of the deceased officer, James Koumoundouros.

By reason of the statutory increase, there remains $10,000.00 to be awarded by the Court, and that *1044$10,000.00 could not have been subject to the beneficiary form above noted. The statute is clear in providing that the “entire sum shall be paid to the spouse.” Here, under the facts, the “entire sum” of necessity refers to any portion of the statutory amount not designated by the officer in the beneficiary form.

It is fundamental and does not require the citation of authority that in construing a statute the words used will be given their plain meaning and, if possible, will be so construed as to give effect to the legislative intent. In short, with this enactment, there is no ambiguity, and there is no need to construe, or to search the language used by the General Assembly in an effort to give effect to the legislative intent.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant, Karen Koumoundouros, be awarded the sum of $15,000.00, and the deceased’s sons, James Koumoundouros II and Mark Koumoundouros, be awarded the sum of $2,500.00 each.
### §1323. Conservation of fishery resources

Upon the convocation of a conference on the use or conservation of international fishery resources, the President shall, by all appropriate means at his disposal, seek to persuade countries whose domestic fishing practices or policies affect such resources, to engage in negotiations in good faith relating to the use or conservation of such resources. If, after such efforts by the President and by other countries which have agreed to engage in such negotiations, any other country whose conservation practices or policies affect the interests of the United States and such other countries, has, in the judgment of the President, failed or refused to engage in such negotiations in good faith, the President may, if he is satisfied that such action is likely to be effective in inducing such country to engage in such negotiations in good faith, increase the rate of duty on any fish (in any form) which is the product of such country, for such time as he deems necessary, to a rate not more than 50 percent above the rate existing on July 1, 1934.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title III, §323, as added Pub. L. 87–794, title II, §257(i), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 883.)
### §2582. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–67, title II, §214(d), Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 393

Section, Pub. L. 96–39, title XI, §1112, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 316, authorized payment of compensation to losses in taxes resulting from concessions granted by United States in Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations on articles produced by United States possessions on which excise taxes are levied by United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 5, 1983, see section 218(a) of Pub. L. 98–67, which is classified to section 2706 of this title.