alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthcare Services Group, Inc., a
    Pennsylvania corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter March
    31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
    hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, James L. DiStefano, Chief Financial Officer of
    the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
    pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                         /s/ James L. DiStefano
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         James L. DiStefano
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         April 21, 2006









                                      -31-
                                      ----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall M.
Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Randall M. Greenwood


Randall M. Greenwood
Chief Financial Officer
August 7, 2002
126 STAT. 10 PUBLIC LAW 112–94—FEB. 14, 2012 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 588: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 112–279 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 157 (2011): Nov. 14, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 158 (2012): Feb. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–94 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge as the Sam D. Hamilton 

Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE 

REFUGE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, 

located in the State of Mississippi, is redesignated as the ‘‘Sam 

D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

(b) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Nothing in this Act prevents the 

Secretary of the Interior from making adjustments to the boundaries 

of the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge (referred 

to in this section as the ‘‘Refuge’’), as the Secretary determines 

to be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife 

Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge 

System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and 

any other applicable authority. 

(c) ADDITION OF LAND.—Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary of the Interior from adding to the Refuge new land or 

parcels of the National Wildlife Refuge System, as the Secretary 

determines to be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the 

National Wildlife Refuge System in accordance with the National 

Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd 

et seq.) and any other applicable authority. 

(d) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document 

of the United States to the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge is 

deemed to refer to the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife 

Refuge. 

Approved February 14, 2012. 

16 USC 668dd 

note. 

Feb. 14, 2012 

[H.R. 588] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
NO. SCWC-10-0000141

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs.

WILLIAM EUGENE MAHADY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. CAAP-10-0000141; FC-CR NO. 10-1-1471)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama,

and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Border, 

in place of Duffy, J., recused, 

with Acoba, J., dissenting separately)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April

16, 2012 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant William Eugene Mahady

is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 31, 2012.

Jon Ikenaga, deputy /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

public defender, 

for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

 /s/ Patrick W. Border

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-10-0000141

31-MAY-2012

10:12 AM
probability that, but for counsel's errors, petitioner would not have 

pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Hill v. Lockhart, 

474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 

1102, 1107 (1996). Both components of the inquiry must be shown. 

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984). 

First, appellant claimed that counsel was ineffective for failing 

to bring appellant's file to a hearing on appellant's motion to withdraw his 

plea. Appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice, as he did not show that 

counsel's performance subsequent to the entry of the guilty plea affected 

appellant's decision to plead guilty. Thus, the district court did not err in 

denying this claim. 

Second, appellant claimed that counsel was ineffective for 

failing to research and understand an intoxication defense. Appellant 

failed to allege any specific facts to support this claim and thus failed to 

demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 

502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984) (holding that no relief is warranted where 

petitioner raises "bare' or 'naked' claims for relief, unsupported by any 

specific factual allegations that would, if true, have entitled him to 

withdrawal of his plea"). Therefore, the district court did not err in 

denying this claim. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A < 

2 
For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that the district 

court did not err in denying the petition. 2Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3 

Hardesty 

at..A.A J. 

Parraguirre 

Cherry LI 

2The district court also denied the petition on the grounds that it 

failed to comply with the requirements of NRS 34.730 and NRS 34.735. 

On appeal, appellant has attempted to amend the defects in his petition. 

Because we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the 

petition on the merits, we need not address whether the petition contained 

pleading defects. 

3We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3 
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Theodore A. Pearil, III 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 4 

(0) 1947A
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 680

 685

 663

 650

 646

 624

 606

 590

 574

 560

 543

 526

 504

 484

 472

 468

 457

 445

 451

 451

 451

 437

 439

 441

 432

 435

 432

 430

 428

 427

 426

 627

 637

 607

 615

 587

 597

 576

 556

 551

 527

 499

 444

 446

 442

 438

 417

 435

 432

 411

 426

 423

 420

 422

 420

 407

 413

 401

 411

 415

 412

 410

 653

 652

 639

 632

 622

 613

 592

 574

 562

 549

 521

 486

 469

 467

 463

 458

 446

 440

 436

 435

 434

 428

 428

 427

 424

 422

 419

 421

 422

 420

 416

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Slip Op. 00 - 14 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, JUDGE
FUJIAN MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT IMPORT & EXPORT CORP., SHANDONG MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORP., Plaintiffs,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Court No. 96-05-01340

JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Fujian Machinery and Equipment Import & Export Corp., et. al v. United States , November 15, 1999 (“Remand Results”), and all other papers filed herein, and no parties having filed comments regarding the Remand Results, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained in all respects.

______________________ Richard W. Goldberg JUDGE Dated: February 8, 2000

New York, New York.
Quick Stats

	Quick Stats lets you create queries based on the simple filtering rules of *What, Where*, and *When*.

**Select Commodity** is the *What*. Click on a value from any visible item list to start your query.  The remaining visible unselected item lists will filter and refresh based on your choices. If the updated fields in the Select Commodity area are satisfactory, you will not have to make more selections in this area unless you want to fine tune your search.

	You may begin filtering in Select Commodity, Select Location or Select Time areas. For example, if you want the most recent corn data, you would start by filtering on Select Time.

	If you would like to select more than one item in any of the data fields, hold the Ctrl key on your keyboard and click on any other items of the same field that you would like to use.  You may also hold the Shift key and select an upper and lower value of a data field to select the entire range. 

 Quick Stats lets you create queries based on the simple filtering rules of *What, Where,*and*When*.

**Select Location** is the *Where*. Click on a value from any visible item list to start your query.  The remaining visible unselected item lists will filter and refresh based on your choices. If the updated fields in the Select Location area are satisfactory, you will not have to make more selections in this area unless you want to fine tune your search.

	You may begin filtering in the Select Location, Select Commodity or Select Time areas. For example, if you want the most recent corn data, you would start by filtering on Select Time.

	If you would like to select more than one item in any of the data fields, hold the **Ctrl** key on your keyboard and click on any other items of the same field that you would like to use.  You may also hold the **Shift** key and select an upper and lower value of a data field to select the entire range. 

	Quick Stats lets you create queries based on the simple filtering rules of *What, Where*, and *When*.

**Select Time** is the *When*. Click on a value from any visible item list to start your query.  The remaining visible unselected item lists will filter and refresh based on your choices. If the updated fields in the Select Time area are satisfactory, you will not have to make more selections in this area unless  you want to fine tune your search.

	You may begin filtering in the Select Time, Select Commodity or Select Location areas. For example, if you want data for a specific area of the country, you may start by filtering in the Select Location area.

	If you would like to select more than one item in any of the data fields, hold the Ctrl key on your keyboard and click on any other items of the same field that you would like to use.  You may also hold the Shift key and select an upper and lower value of a data field to select the entire range.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

§ 26.63 Deposit of securities or cash (including cash equivalents) in lieu of corporate surety. ( a ) *Deposit of securities.* In lieu of corporate surety, the principal may pledge and deposit, as surety for his bond, securities which are transferable and are guaranteed as to both interest and principal by the United States, in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR part 225— Acceptance of Bonds Secured by Government Obligations in Lieu of Bonds with Sureties.
( b ) *Deposit of cash or cash equivalent.* In lieu of corporate surety, a person can file a bond that guarantees payment of the liability by submitting cash or its equivalent (including a money order, cashier's check, or personal check). Cash or its equivalent must be no less than the penal sums of the required bonds. Cash equivalents must be payable to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
(5 U.S.C. 552(a) (80 Stat. 383, as amended); 61 Stat. 650; 6 U.S.C. 15)
[T.D. 6551, 26 FR 1490, Feb. 22, 1961. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-92, 46 FR 46921, Sept. 23, 1981; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1130, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 558.40

 559.66

 560.89

 561.77

 563.81

 565.70

 567.27

 568.87

 570.04

 570.92

 571.69

 572.42

 572.87

 573.25

 573.59

 573.71

 573.82

 573.89

 573.92

 574.06

 574.01

 573.83

 573.13

 571.88

 570.92

 569.97

 568.77

 567.45

 566.53

 566.10

 565.65

 429.4

 435.0

 440.4

 444.4

 453.6

 462.2

 469.4

 476.9

 482.3

 486.5

 490.1

 493.6

 495.7

 497.5

 499.2

 499.7

 500.3

 500.6

 500.7

 501.4

 501.2

 500.3

 497.0

 491.0

 486.5

 482.0

 476.4

 470.2

 466.0

 464.0

 462.0

STORAGE

+6.3

+5.6

+5.5

+3.9

+9.2

+8.6

+7.2

+7.4

+5.5

+4.1

+3.6

+3.5

+2.1

+1.8

+1.6

+0.6

+0.5

+0.3

+0.1

+0.7

-0.2

-0.9

-3.3

-5.9

-4.5

-4.5

-5.6

-6.1

-4.3

-2.0

-2.1

CHANGE

3,500

3,162

3,138

2,434

5,074

4,739

4,196

4,980

4,529

4,251

4,243

4,218

3,649

3,373

3,419

3,432

3,462

3,539

3,560

4,048

3,928

3,833

2,907

1,842

2,690

2,853

2,605

2,775

3,263

3,426

3,308

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 259

 367

 348

 382

 465

 626

 747

 710

 675

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 307

 309

 346

 400

 400

 354

 506

 721

 950

 1,050

 1,079

 1,158

 1,258

 1,125

 1,271

 1,808

 1,879

 2,017

 2,158

 2,375

 2,697

 2,940

 2,999

 3,157

 3,301

 3,418

 3,674

 3,946

 3,870

 3,558

 3,498

FRIANT-KERN

 3

 17

 9

 23

 10

 10

 13

 11

 15

 23

 26

 8

 5

 25

 19

 25

 8

 43

 20

 23

 42

 17

 34

 18

 34

 14

 12

 12

 10

 6

 24

C.F.S.

 .02

 .12

 .06

 .16

 .07

 .07

 .09

 .07

 .10

 .15

 .17

 .05

 .03

 .16

 .12

 .16

 .05

 .28

 .13

 .15

 .27

 .11

 .22

 .12

 .22

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .16

INCHES

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .03

 1.04

 .00

 .46

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 24, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +38.8 110,376 4,579 58,529 0 559 3.67 1.71

ACRE-FEET +38,793 218,931 9,082 116,092 0 1,109

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 116,092

 9,082 179,032

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 1999 TO DATE = 15.87

 423.2

 53,858 1.71

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 33

 33

 31

 29

 30

 30

 30

 497

 799

 1,093

 1,304

 1,306

 1,307

 1,308

 1,309

 1,310

 1,310

 1,310

 1,310

 1,311

 1,311

 1,310

 1,303

 1,297

 1,294

 1,290

 1,288

 1,287

 780

 151

 152

RIVER

 27,153

 53,858

RIVER

Table 15
MATERIAL CONTRACTS  Exhibit 10 is:  (1) Employment Agreement between James S.
Marlen and the Company.  (2) First Amendment to Employment Agreement
between James S. Marlen and the Company.  (3) Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
between James S. Marlen and the Company.  (4) Change of Control Agreement between
Javier Solis and the Company.  (5) Change of Control Agreement between Gary
Wagner and the Company.  (6) Change of Control Agreement between James
R. McLaughlin and the Company.  (7) 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.  Exhibit 10, Item (1)  is incorporated by reference to Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission for Registrants fiscal year
ended November 30, 1997.  Exhibit 10, Items (2), (4) and (5) are
incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Commission for Registrants fiscal year ended November 30, 1998.  Exhibit 10, Item (6) is incorporated by
reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission for
Registrants fiscal year ended November 30, 2000.  Exhibit 10, Item (7) is incorporated by
reference to Registration Statement No. 333-61816 on Form S-8 filed with the
Commission on May 29, 2001.   Exhibit
10     SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  This is the Second Amendment
to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement which was entered into in May,
1997 and was effective as of June 11, 1996 (Agreement), between Ameron
International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) and James S.
Marlen (the Employee), which was previously amended by the First Amendment to
the Agreement effective as of May 15, 1998.  I.  Paragraph 8.2 of the
Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:  8.2In addition to
the pension benefits described in paragraph 8.1 hereinabove, the Company shall
provide the following additional pension benefits to Employee with twenty-five
(25) years of service under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
SERP) described in paragraph 8.1 hereinabove at age 60, and with an additional
year of service under the SERP for each actual year of service during his
employment with the Company between ages 60 and 65 so that Employee will be
credited with thirty (30) years of service under the SERP at age 65.  II.  Paragraph 10.3(1)(ii) of the
Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:  (ii) the highest management
incentive bonus paid to Employee during the three and one-half years preceding
termination (but not less than one hundred percent (100%) times Employees
annual base salary determined as of the date of termination);  III.  All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed.   
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement effective as of
May 16, 2001.  AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION  By:Stephen W. FossChairman, Compensation
  & Stock Option CommitteeBoard of DirectorsEMPLOYEEJames S. Marlen
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6114

JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; DR. BRIAN S. COPE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 00068

- LCB

- JLW )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Anthony Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
James Antho ny Barnett , Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timel y filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 3, 2016. The noti ce of appeal was filed on January 8, 2018. * Because Barnett failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal and deny Bennett’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. A pp. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
---

---

Exhibit 11.1

AMPAL - AMERICAN
ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH
COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE OF CLASS A STOCK

|SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,      | 2004 | 2003
|------------------------------ | ---- | ----
|
|
|
|
|BASIC EPS                      |      |     
|Net Gain (loss) (1)            |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (Loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     
|                               |      |     
|DILUTED EPS                    |      |     
|Net Gain (loss)                |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Gain (loss) per Class A Share  |      |     
|                               |      |     
|Shares used in calculation (2) |      |     

| | (1) | After
deduction of accrued preferred stock dividends of $107 and $109 respectively.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | In
2004, the conversion of the 4% and 6-1/2% Preferred Stock and the exercise of stock
options                    were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation due to the
antidilutive effect.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---