alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.31 Retail dealer in liquors. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, every person who sells or offers for sale distilled spirits, wines, or beer to any person other than a dealer is a retail dealer in liquors for purposes of this part. Every retail dealer in liquors must comply with the registration and other requirements of this part, unless the dealer is covered by an applicable exemption under subpart D of this part.
( b ) *Persons not deemed to be retail dealers in liquors.* The following persons are not retail dealers in liquors within the meaning of this part: ( 1 ) A retail dealer in beer as described in § 31.33(a),
( 2 ) A limited retail dealer as described in § 31.35, or
( 3 ) A person who sells or offers for sale distilled spirits, wines, or beer only as provided in § 31.61 through § 31.64 or § 31.65(a).
(26 U.S.C. 5122)
Exhibit 5.1
  
 Re:
    
    UniSource Energy Corporation 2011 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan
  Company Registration Statement Securities
Act Shares Plan
       Very truly yours,/s/ Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
### subpart 6—miscellaneous provisions
### §1102a. Program authority and eligibility

#### (a) Program authorized

Subject to the availability of funds appropriated to carry out this part, the Secretary shall award grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible institutions to enable the eligible institutions to carry out the authorized activities described in section 1102b of this title.

#### (b) Eligibility

For the purposes of this part, an "eligible institution" means an institution of higher education that—

(1) is a Hispanic-serving institution (as defined in section 1101a of this title); and

(2) offers a postbaccalaureate certificate or postbaccalaureate degree granting program.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title V, §512, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title V, §502(a)(3), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3332.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1102a, Pub. L. 89–329, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title V, §501(a), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 656, related to State applications for allotments, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–244.

A prior section 512 of Pub. L. 89–329 was renumbered section 522, and is classified to section 1103a of this title.

Another prior section 512 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1103a of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–244.

Another prior section 512 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1103a of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–325.

Another prior section 512 of Pub. L. 89–329 was classified to section 1102 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35.
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Russell R. Roth, certify that;
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
 within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
  
 Date: May 14, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Russell R. Roth
 By:  Russell R. Roth
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
    1
February 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER JUDGE (2)

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET

(1)

FRANCIS CARR

POWER PLANT C. F. S. INCHES

13.986

1 1,901.47 14.263 277 482 0 315 0 26 1 0.04

2 1,901.63 14.382 119 402 0 316 0 26 0 0.02

3 1,901.57 14.337 -45 321 0 316 0 27 1 0.04

4 1,901.60 14.360 23 360 0 319 0 27 2 0.08

5 1,901.61 14.367 7 462 0 321 0 136 1 0.06

6 1,901.01 13.918 -449 235 0 317 0 143 1 0.04

7 1,901.16 14.031 113 395 0 312 0 25 1 0.04

8 1,901.16 14.031 0 404 0 314 0 89 1 0.04

9 1,901.26 14.105 74 375 0 313 0 25 0 0.02

10 1,901.47 14.263 158 421 0 314 0 26 1 0.03

11 1,901.50 14.285 22 353 0 315 0 26 1 0.04

12 1,901.51 14.292 7 346 0 315 0 26 1 0.04

13 1,901.51 14.292 0 342 0 315 0 26 1 0.05

14 1,901.37 14.188 -104 292 0 318 0 25 1 0.05

15 1,901.39 14.203 15 511 0 318 0 185 0 0.00

16 1,901.47 14.263 60 369 0 314 0 25 0 0.00

17 1,900.83 13.786 -477 122 0 316 0 46 0 0.02

18 1,900.48 13.528 -258 208 0 312 0 25 1 0.04

19 1,900.95 13.874 346 513 0 314 0 25 0 0.02

20 1,901.40 14.210 336 517 0 322 0 25 1 0.03

21 1,901.16 14.031 -179 302 0 320 0 71 1 0.03

22 1,900.84 13.793 -238 222 0 316 0 26 0 0.02

23 1,900.53 13.565 -228 225 0 313 0 26 1 0.03

24 1,900.92 13.852 287 484 0 312 0 26 1 0.05

25 1,900.83 13.786 -66 312 0 315 0 26 4 0.19

26 1,901.01 13.918 132 406 0 312 0 25 2 0.08

27 1,901.42 14.225 307 497 0 316 0 24 2 0.10

28 1,901.42 14.225 0 345 0 318 0 25 2 0.09

29 1,901.49 14.278 53 371 0 318 0 24 2 0.09

TOTALS 292 10,594 0 9,156 0 1,257 30 1.38

ACRE-FEET 292 21,013 0 18,161 0 2,493 60

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE. (2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Total Power 0 Judge Francis Carr Powerplant 2,493

Total River 18,161 Total Release 20,655

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lewiston Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/10/2024
488 P.2d 1209

#### EVCO, a New Mexico corporation, d/b/a Evco Instructional Designs, Petitioner, v. Franklin JONES, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico, et al., Respondents.

No. 9322.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 29, 1971.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 430, 83 N.M. 110, 488 P.2d 1214, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
§ 663.5 What is the duration of a fellowship? ( a ) A fellowship is for a period of not fewer than three nor more than twelve months.
( b ) A fellowship may not be renewed.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
February 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* SPRING SHASTA EVAP

ACRE-FEET INFLOW CR. P. P. RELEASE RELEASE - C.F.S. C. F. S.

DAY ELEV RES. CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE C. F. S. POWER SPILL FISHTRAP (1)

20,399

1 582.42 20,937 538 3,612 538 2,493 3,340 0 0 1

2 584.08 21,939 1,002 3,842 815 2,432 3,336 0 0 1

3 583.58 21,635 -304 3,168 366 2,250 3,321 0 0 0

4 583.78 21,756 121 3,378 334 2,476 3,317 0 0 0

5 583.95 21,860 104 3,374 37 2,742 3,322 0 0 0

6 583.63 21,665 -195 3,225 37 2,604 3,323 0 0 0

7 583.44 21,550 -115 3,211 37 2,569 3,268 0 0 1

8 582.68 21,092 -458 3,024 37 2,517 3,254 0 0 1

9 582.30 20,865 -227 3,184 37 2,546 3,297 0 0 1

10 581.82 20,581 -284 3,156 37 2,513 3,297 0 0 2

11 581.51 20,399 -182 3,202 37 2,572 3,294 0 0 0

12 581.93 20,645 246 3,420 37 2,816 3,294 0 0 2

13 582.08 20,734 89 3,344 37 2,769 3,297 0 0 2

14 581.55 20,422 -312 3,143 37 2,650 3,297 0 0 3

15 580.63 19,887 -535 3,027 37 2,415 3,295 0 0 2

16 580.61 19,875 -12 3,291 37 2,688 3,296 0 0 1

17 580.62 19,881 6 3,299 37 2,709 3,295 0 0 1

18 581.12 20,170 289 3,448 37 2,876 3,300 0 0 2

19 581.71 20,516 346 3,472 37 2,937 3,295 0 0 3

20 581.30 20,276 -240 3,172 40 2,587 3,292 0 0 1

21 580.97 20,083 -193 3,204 258 2,488 3,299 0 0 2

22 581.34 20,299 216 3,432 423 2,444 3,321 0 0 2

23 581.78 20,557 258 3,458 42 2,812 3,326 0 0 2

24 581.19 20,211 -346 3,150 378 2,207 3,324 0 0 0

25 580.43 19,772 -439 3,105 317 2,242 3,326 0 0 0

26 582.55 21,014 1,242 3,947 329 2,891 3,321 0 0 0

27 584.25 22,044 1,030 3,860 323 2,687 3,327 0 0 14

28 585.21 22,639 595 3,643 314 2,488 3,328 0 0 15

TOTALS 2,240 93,791 5,032 72,420 92,602 0 0 59

ACRE-FEET 2,240 186,034 9,981 143,645 183,676 0 0 117

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 183,676

Spill 0

Fish Trap 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Keswick Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/29/2023
### §58. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–410, title II, §214(a), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 904

Section, R.S. §2654; acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, 37 Stat. 434; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §307, 84 Stat. 292, provided for fees of customs officers for eleven enumerated types of services. See section 58a of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 41.72c Package use-up rule. ( a ) During the period from June 22, 2009, through March 23, 2010, an importer of tobacco products may remove packages of pipe tobacco or roll-your-own tobacco that do not meet the requirements of § 41.72a(a) or § 41.72b(a), provided that such packages bear the designation “Tax Class L” (to designate pipe tobacco) or “Tax Class J” (to designate roll-your-own tobacco) and were in use prior to June 22, 2009.
( b ) During the period from June 22, 2009, through March 23, 2010, an importer may remove roll-your-own tobacco for which the applicable designation is “cigar tobacco,” “cigarette wrapper,” or “cigar wrapper” even if the packages of such products do not meet the requirements of § 41.72b.
[T.D. TTB-81, 74 FR 48654, Sept. 24, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 652

 644

 737

 667

 589

 517

 522

 548

 540

 538

 529

 647

 729

 807

 845

 647

 510

 466

 496

 508

 457

 507

 437

 430

 492

 533

 571

 600

 670

 573

 301

 296

 297

 287

 319

 304

 317

 319

 325

 320

 296

 314

 301

 319

 320

 283

 264

 293

 289

 286

 289

 276

 288

 301

 296

 295

 299

 291

 282

 271

 418

 444

 443

 418

 405

 378

 391

 415

 397

 384

 365

 390

 416

 462

 459

 385

 359

 366

 370

 362

 348

 366

 345

 349

 353

 378

 386

 386

 405

 407

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 5,677

 5,665

 5,649

 5,631

 5,630

 5,610

 5,604

 5,614

 5,612

 5,610

 5,594

 5,610

 5,653

 5,726

 5,767

 5,708

 5,624

 5,572

 5,537

 5,521

 5,478

 5,429

 5,377

 5,342

 5,330

 5,318

 5,288

 5,212

 5,158

 5,180

 406

 405

 404

 402

 402

 401

 400

 401

 401

 401

 400

 401

 404

 409

 412

 408

 402

 398

 396

 394

 391

 388

 384

 382

 381

 380

 378

 372

 368

 370

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 306

 294

 301

 292

 281

 294

 287

 294

 294

 301

 308

 301

 302

 299

 305

 302

 295

 294

 309

 318

 310

 311

 307

 307

 304

 304

 296

 300

 268

 265

 263

 264

 257

 266

 269

 267

 262

 267

 268

 272

 276

 275

 274

 275

 274

 275

 280

 279

 282

 282

 280

 267

 274

 271

 275

 277

 282

 279

 280

 275

 269

 276

 276

 276

 276

 281

 281

 283

 286

 286

 287

 286

 283

 284

 290

 294

 294

 293

 294

 285

 287

 286

 285

 288

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS KISAKA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 55649

D.C. No. 2:11

- cv

- 01942

- BRO

MAN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Beverly Reid O’ Connell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2016 **

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY , and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Douglas Kisaka appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

action alleging federal and state law claims arising various incidents that occurred

on the University of Southern California ’s campus. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 55649

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review f or an abuse of discretion the district court’s

dismissal for failure to comply with court orders

. Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv.

,

833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Kisaka’s action

af ter Kisaka repeatedly failed to comply with court orders, meet deadlines, or

appear at hearings, despite bein g warned that failure to do so w ould result in

dismissal. See id. (discussing the five factors the district court must weigh before

dismissing a c ase for failure to comply with a court order ). Because we affirm the

district court’s dismissal of Kisaka’s action for failure to comply with court orders,

we do not consider Kisaka’s challenges to the district court’s interlocutory orders.

See Al

- Torki v. Kaempen , 78 F.3d 1381, 1386 (9th Cir. 1996) (“[I]nterlocutory

orders, generally appealable after final judgment, are not appealable after a

dismissal for failure to prosecute, whether the failure to prosecute is purposeful or

is a result of negligence o r mistake.” (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted)).

Kisak a’s request for judicial notice, filed on April 9, 2015, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

QXMEDICAL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC, ARROW 

INTERNATIONAL LLC, TELEFLEX LLC, 

TELEFLEX LIFE SCIENCES LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

______________________

2024-1572

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Minnesota in No. 0:17-cv-01969-PJS-TNL, 

Judge Patrick J. Schiltz.

-------------------------------------------------

QXMEDICAL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC, ARROW 

INTERNATIONAL LLC, TELEFLEX LLC, 

TELEFLEX LIFE SCIENCES LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

Case: 24-1572 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 04/10/2024
2 QXMEDICAL, LLC v. VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC

2024-1573

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Minnesota in No. 0:17-cv-01969-PJS-TNL, 

Judge Patrick J. Schiltz.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of 

voluntary dismissal of the cross-appeal, Appeal No. 2024-

1573, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appeal No. 2024-1573 is dismissed. The revised official caption for the remaining appeal, Appeal No. 2024-

1572, is reflected in this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 

2024-1573.

(3) Appellants’ opening brief in Appeal No. 2024-1572

is due no later than May 14, 2024.

April 10, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2024-1573 only): 

April 10, 2024

Case: 24-1572 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 04/10/2024
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(A)  Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and
               Russell K. Thal dated March 14, 1996


March 14, 1996

Russell K. Thal
26 Ridge Drive
Port Washington, New York  11050

Dear Mr. Thal:

Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of December 1,
1993 between Compuflight, Inc. ("Compuflight") and Russell K. Thal ("Thal") (the
"Employment Agreement").

Compuflight and Thal hereby agree that the provisions of Section 8 of the
Employment Agreement are null and void as of December 1, 1993.  Compuflight and
Thal hereby agree further that, effective as of March 1, 1996, a new Paragraph 8
of the Employment Agreement is added as follows:

"8.  Retirement

The Company agrees to acquire on or before July 31, 1996 an annuity and/or
universal life insurance policy (the "Policy") taken out with an insurance
company licensed to do business in the State of New York and having a
BESTS/MOODYS/STANDARD & POORS rating of not less than "A", which will provide
for the following:  (a)  the Employee being the beneficiary thereof;  (b)
commencing one (1) month following the later of  (i)  the end of the Employment
Period or  (ii)  the cessation date of the Employee's employment with the
Company, the payment to the Employee of sixty (60) equal monthly installments of
Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) (such payments not to extend beyond the
Employee's death, except that, if the cessation date of the Employee's
employment with the Company is after March 31, 1999, and the Employee dies after
March 31, 2004, the Employee shall be entitled to receive all sixty (60) monthly
payments provided for hereunder); and  (c)  a death benefit in the amount of Six
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) covering the Employee's death through March
31, 2004, which amount shall decrease to the extent of any payments pursuant to
(b)  above.  The Policy shall be paid for in equal monthly installments over the
period ending March 31, 1999.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employee shall
not be entitled to any of the payments set forth in  (b)  above if, prior to the
end of the Employment Period, the Employee voluntarily terminates his employment
with the Company."

Except as amended hereby, the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

<PAGE>

This agreement shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the
successors, assigns and legal representatives of Compuflight and Thal.

The Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, may be amended only by a writing
executed by Compuflight and Thal.

If the foregoing is acceptable, please indicate your agreement thereto by
signing in the space provided below and returning an executed copy to the
undersigned.

                              Very truly yours,
Agreed to:                    COMPUFLIGHT, INC.
Russell K. Thal
                              /s/  Dorothy A. English
                              -----------------------
/s/  Russell K. Thal
--------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 282

 297

 324

 376

 407

 424

 448

 474

 495

 523

 547

 581

 605

 627

 639

 707

 740

 699

 711

 719

 746

 731

 746

 725

 713

 740

 747

 747

 759

 765

 758

 238

 245

 254

 261

 298

 319

 322

 335

 356

 382

 414

 445

 463

 471

 494

 500

 557

 588

 536

 582

 580

 590

 575

 582

 577

 602

 610

 596

 602

 603

 612

 254

 266

 284

 315

 341

 348

 361

 386

 410

 435

 461

 487

 511

 525

 542

 617

 653

 625

 609

 624

 638

 634

 639

 638

 634

 639

 641

 646

 653

 658

 659

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.114 Kerosene. ( a ) *Distillation range.* (For applicable ASTM method, see 1980 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 25, page 395, Standard No. D 3699-78 for burner fuel; see Part 23, page 849, Standard Nos. D 1655-80a for aviation turbine fuels and D 86-78 for distillation of petroleum products; for incorporation by reference, see § 21.6(b).) No distillate should come over below 340 °F. and none above 570 °F.
( b ) *Flash point.* 115 °F. minimum.
( c ) *Odor.* Characteristic odor.
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

§ 26.220 Formulas for liquors. ( a ) *Distilled spirits products.* Persons in the Virgin Islands who ship distilled spirits beverage products to the United States shall comply with the formula requirements of part 5 of this chapter. If any product contains liquors made outside of Virgin Islands, the country of origin for each such liquor shall be stated on the formula. All formulas required by this paragraph shall be submitted on TTB Form 5110.38, in accordance with § 26.224.
( b ) *Wine.* Persons in the Virgin Islands who ship wine to the United States shall comply with the formula requirements of part 24 of this chapter. If any wines contains liquors made outside of the Virgin Islands, the country of origin for each such liquor shall be stated on the formula. All formulas required by this paragraph shall be submitted on TTB Form 698 Supplemental, in accordance with § 26.224.
[T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71715, Dec. 11, 1979, as amended by T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8552, Mar. 1, 1985. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-459, 66 FR 38550, 38552, July 25, 2001; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011]