alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 527.80

 527.93

 528.58

 529.24

 530.63

 531.16

 531.76

 532.33

 533.08

 533.97

 534.72

 535.42

 535.96

 536.41

 536.69

 537.04

 537.27

 537.48

 538.07

 538.83

 539.28

 539.75

 539.99

 540.18

 540.70

 541.27

 542.37

 543.22

 544.05

 544.88

 545.71

 306.9

 307.4

 309.7

 312.1

 317.3

 319.2

 321.4

 323.6

 326.4

 329.7

 332.6

 335.2

 337.3

 339.0

 340.1

 341.4

 342.3

 343.1

 345.4

 348.4

 350.1

 352.0

 352.9

 353.7

 355.7

 358.0

 362.3

 365.7

 369.0

 372.4

 375.8

STORAGE

+0.9

+0.5

+2.4

+2.4

+5.1

+2.0

+2.2

+2.1

+2.8

+3.3

+2.8

+2.7

+2.1

+1.7

+1.1

+1.3

+0.9

+0.8

+2.3

+3.0

+1.8

+1.8

+0.9

+0.7

+2.0

+2.2

+4.4

+3.4

+3.3

+3.3

+3.4

CHANGE

828

580

1,422

1,316

2,735

1,077

1,218

1,166

1,519

1,779

1,532

1,595

1,419

1,257

904

1,043

826

777

1,536

1,882

1,277

1,371

915

843

1,516

1,766

2,945

2,558

2,606

2,610

2,651

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 253

 253

 116

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 156

 268

 269

 270

 270

 271

 271

 272

 273

 274

 319

 352

 352

 380

 537

 643

 730

 792

 792

 792

FRIANT-KERN

 15

 5

 26

 13

 72

 5

 10

 10

 19

 5

 14

 10

 27

 30

 5

 7

 20

 10

 26

 30

 29

 37

 3

 29

 20

 10

 19

 16

 21

 14

 45

C.F.S.

 .13

 .04

 .22

 .11

 .60

 .04

 .08

 .08

 .16

 .04

 .11

 .08

 .22

 .24

 .04

 .06

 .16

 .08

 .21

 .24

 .23

 .29

 .02

 .23

 .16

 .08

 .15

 .12

 .16

 .11

 .34

INCHES

 .02

 .07

 .07

 .98

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 28, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +69.8 47,469 0 8,905 0 602 4.83 1.31

ACRE-FEET +69,802 94,155 0 17,663 0 1,194

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 17,663

 0 23,161

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 11.62

 305.9

 5,498 1.31

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 86

 86

 86

 86

 86

 86

 86

 86

 87

 87

 87

 87

 87

 87

 87

 87

 86

 86

 86

 86

 86

 84

 102

 115

 116

 116

RIVER

 2,772

 5,498

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 152

 145

 147

 146

 143

 145

 150

 144

 135

 144

 143

 131

 127

 121

 121

 118

 112

 107

 110

 105

 102

 102

 100

 104

 103

 103

 100

 97

 92

 88

 137

 133

 133

 130

 133

 134

 134

 133

 130

 130

 128

 122

 118

 110

 113

 109

 104

 99

 103

 97

 94

 92

 96

 90

 90

 94

 89

 83

 76

 73

 142

 137

 138

 139

 136

 138

 139

 138

 133

 135

 135

 127

 123

 117

 116

 114

 108

 103

 107

 101

 98

 99

 98

 99

 99

 101

 95

 92

 88

 84

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[112th Congress Public Law 83]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 1869]]

Public Law 112-83
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
20 Main Street in Little Ferry, New Jersey, as the ``Sergeant Matthew J. 
       Fenton Post Office''. <<NOTE: Jan. 3, 2012 -  [H.R. 789]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT MATTHEW J. FENTON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 20 Main Street in Little Ferry, New Jersey, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Matthew J. Fenton Post Office''.

    Approved January 3, 2012.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 789:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            July 28, 29, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41301

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff–Appellee

v.

JOSE CARLOS PINEDA, 

 Defendant–Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal concerns a $100 assessment. 

In 2001, Jose Carlos Pineda pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation

and was sentenced to seventy months of imprisonment and three years of

supervised release. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013, he was also ordered to pay a

$100 special assessment, the proceeds of which would be deposited in the Crime

Victims Fund. After serving his sentence of imprisonment, Pineda was deported

to Mexico in 2005. He did not pay the assessment. 

In 2008, seven years after the 2001 judgment, Pineda was found illegally

present in this country again, in violation of federal law and his supervised

release terms. Pineda’s supervised release was revoked, and in a written order,

the district court reimposed the unpaid special assessment.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 22, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 08-41301 Document: 00511010538 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2010
No. 08-41301

2

On appeal, Pineda argues that this act was ultra vires. The government

agrees that the district court exceeded its authority, regardless whether it

sought to reinstate the previous unpaid assessment or to impose a new

assessment. Section 3013(c) states that “The obligation to pay an assessment

ceases five years after the date of the judgment.” Neither § 3013 nor 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583, which concerns supervised release, sanctions the imposition of a § 3013

assessment for revocation of a term of supervised release. The district court

therefore lacked authority to impose or reimpose a special assessment.

 Accordingly, we VACATE in part and REMAND for amendment of the

judgment consistent with this opinion.

Case: 08-41301 Document: 00511010538 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2010
(No. 6651

#### Stewart Olson Implement Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Stewart Olson Implement Company, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*19Perlin, C.J.
§ 19.247 Use of effective (actual) tax rates. ( a ) *Select method of applying tax rate.* The proprietor may choose to apply an effective tax rate to taxable removals of distilled spirits products in accordance with § 19.248, § 19.249, or § 19.250. Any proprietor who does not elect one of these options must establish an effective tax rate for each batch of distilled spirits product on which a claim for tax credit for alcohol derived from eligible wine or eligible flavor will be made. The proprietor must compute the effective tax rates for these products in accordance with the instructions in § 19.246.
( b ) *Record tax rates used.* The proprietor must record the effective tax rate used on the dump or batch records for the products as required by § 19.598. The proprietor must record the serial numbers of cases of product removed at each rate on the record of tax determination or other related record. The proprietor must keep these records available for inspection by TTB officers.
(26 U.S.C. 5010, 5207)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.96

 1,901.18

 1,901.37

 1,901.60

 1,901.59

 1,901.62

 1,901.65

 1,901.32

 1,900.57

 1,900.56

 1,900.67

 1,900.74

 1,901.00

 1,900.64

 1,901.40

 1,901.01

 1,901.03

 1,901.03

 1,900.73

 1,900.62

 1,900.93

 1,901.05

 1,901.07

 1,901.40

 1,901.49

 1,901.49

 1,901.49

 1,901.43

 1,901.77

 1,901.69

 1,901.76

 13,882

 14,046

 14,188

 14,360

 14,352

 14,375

 14,397

 14,150

 13,595

 13,587

 13,668

 13,720

 13,911

 13,646

 14,210

 13,918

 13,933

 13,933

 13,712

 13,631

 13,859

 13,948

 13,963

 14,210

 14,278

 14,278

 14,278

 14,233

 14,487

 14,427

 14,479

STORAGE

+0

+164

+142

+172

-8

+23

+22

-247

-555

-8

+81

+52

+191

-265

+564

-292

+15

+0

-221

-81

+228

+89

+15

+247

+68

+0

+0

-45

+254

-60

+52

CHANGE

355

423

400

416

326

342

344

1,841

1,590

1,762

1,794

1,682

1,921

1,763

1,653

1,739

1,813

1,736

1,538

1,739

1,915

1,921

1,785

1,885

1,766

1,796

1,846

1,745

464

303

358

INFLOW

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

 110

POWER

 175

 174

 162

 163

 166

 166

 165

 170

 179

 177

 178

 182

 181

 180

 181

 182

 181

 182

 180

 178

 180

 181

 181

 182

 183

 185

 182

 181

 182

 182

 181

SPILL

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 31

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

OUTLETS

 2

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 0

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 18

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .05

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .07

 .13

 .02

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .08

 .04

 .08

 .13

 .08

 .03

 .05

 .00

 .08

 .10

 .07

 .20

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 13, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +597 40,961 3,410 886 5,502 65 2.21

ACRE-FEET +597 81,246 6,764 1,757 10,913 129

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 6,764

TOTAL RIVER 19,434 80,518

 13,882

 61,084

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 28

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 18

 1,655

 1,555

 1,453

 1,438

 1,336

 1,506

 1,580

 1,050

 1,569

 1,487

 1,418

 1,332

 1,465

 1,484

 1,558

 1,458

 1,441

 1,413

 1,475

 1,528

 1,434

 17

 14

 14

 30,796

 61,084

Table 6
### §1234e. Cease and desist orders

#### (a) Issuance and contents of complaint

In accordance with section 1234c of this title, the Secretary may issue to a recipient under an applicable program a complaint which—

(1) describes the factual and legal basis for the Secretary's belief that the recipient is failing to comply substantially with a requirement of law; and

(2) contains a notice of a hearing to be held before the Office on a date at least 30 days after the service of the complaint.

#### (b) Appearance contesting order

The recipient upon which a complaint has been served shall have the right to appear before the Office on the date specified and to show cause why an order should not be entered by the Office requiring the recipient to cease and desist from the violation of law charged in the complaint.

#### (c) Report; issuance of cease and desist order

The testimony in any hearing held under this section shall be reduced to writing and filed with the Office. If upon that hearing the Office is of the opinion that the recipient is in violation of any requirement of law as charged in the complaint, the Office shall—

(1) make a report in writing stating its findings of fact; and

(2) issue to the recipient an order requiring the recipient to cease and desist from the practice, policy, or procedure which resulted in the violation.

#### (d) Report and order as final agency action

The report and order of the Office under this section shall become the final agency action when the recipient receives the report and order.

#### (e) Enforcement of final order

The Secretary may enforce a final order of the Office under this section which becomes final agency action by—

(1) withholding from the recipient any portion of the amount payable to it, including the amount payable for administrative costs, under the applicable program; or

(2) certifying the facts to the Attorney General who shall cause an appropriate proceeding to be brought for the enforcement of the order.

(Pub. L. 90–247, title IV, §456, as added Pub. L. 95–561, title XII, §1232, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2351; amended Pub. L. 100–297, title III, §3501(a), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 355.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–297 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to cease and desist orders for provisions relating to use of recovered funds. See section 1234h of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–297 effective 180 days after Apr. 28, 1988, but not applicable to recipients receiving written notice to return funds prior to that date, see section 3501(b) of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as a note under section 1234 of this title.
### Part A—Graduate Education Programs
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

73) IV-C-39 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:54 AM Sheet 73 of 232 
— — p? 

/ » % X21-C-39 

£ A i 

I ^W ? S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\<W4Wf WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

%

« « ^ JAN -:5 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable James A. McClure 

United States Senate 

Washington, D. C. 20510 

Dear Senator McClure: 

This in response to your January 6, 1988, letter relaying 

the concerns of Mr. Roy Raymond regarding EPA's regulatory 

proposal to require onboard canisters on new vehicles to 

control refueling emissions. To assist you with your response, 

I have enclosed a copy of our proposal for your review. 

Section E (pages 31177-31182) explains EPA's overall rationale 

for proposing onboard controls. If you would like further 

details of our analysis, please contact Mr. Philip Carlson of 

the Standards Development and Support Branch of the Emission 

Control Technology Division, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, 

MI 48105 (FTS 374-8270 or Commercial (313) 668-4270). 

Thank you for your letter. We will place- the comments 

from Mr. Raymond in our public docket and fully consider 

his comments in the next phase of our rulemaking process. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket A-87-11
(No. 74-CC-136

#### Evelyn Pauline Steck, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

Evelyn Pauline Steck, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William J. Dessaure, Appellant.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court of Nassau County convicting him of the crime of assault in the.second degree. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I.     PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION
- A. Introduction
- B. Purpose and Need for Action
- C. The Issues
II.     THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- A. Climate
- B. Air Quality
- C. Water Quantity and Quality
- D. Geology and Soils
- E. Vegetative Habitats and Habitat Management
- F. Wildlife and Biological Diversity
- G. Candidate, Threatened, and Endangered Species
- H. Public Use, Compatibility, and Environmental Education
- I. Cultural Resources
- J. Socioeconomic Aspects
III.     ALTERNATIVES, INLUCING THE PROPOSED ACTION
IV.    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
- Alternative A: Ecosystem Approach (Proposed and Preferred Alternative)
- Alternative B: No Action
- Alternative C: Maximize Habitat Developments and Public Use Program
V.     CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
VI.     MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED/PREFERRED ACTION
VII.     CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH OTHERS
VIII.     LIST OF PREPARERS
IX.     REFERENCES
APPENDIX
- A. Introduction
- B. Refuge Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T19:32:51-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.130 Spike lavender oil, natural. ( a ) *Alcohol content (as borneol).* Not less than 30 percent by weight.
( b ) *Esters (as bornyl acetate).* Not less than 1.5 percent by weight.
( c ) *Refractive index at 20 °C.* 1.4630 to 1.4680.
( d ) *Specific gravity at 25 °/25 °C.* 0.893 to 0.909.
( e ) *Odor.* Characteristic odor.
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]
### Part D—Immigrant Education
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nothing Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Anthony DeMint                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 1, 2005
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of McDATA Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ernest J. Sampias,Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated: June 9, 2003 | /s/ ERNEST  J. SAMPIAS                                        |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Ernest J. Sampias                                             |
|                | Senior Vice  President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----