alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND
THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE NOTES RELATED THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         242,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               77,085,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,850,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            96,427,381
<PP&E>                                     638,402,944
<DEPRECIATION>                             157,129,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             591,533,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,593,021
<BONDS>                                    202,404,874
<COMMON>                                       123,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 235,210,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               591,533,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           620,414,137
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              563,621,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,591,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             47,422,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                16,834,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         30,587,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                30,587,425
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.39


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,921

 3,192

 2,736

 2,360

 2,170

 2,327

 2,442

 2,648

 2,794

 2,958

 2,863

 3,963

 3,429

 2,622

 2,588

 2,410

 2,449

 3,111

 2,691

 2,434

 2,173

 1,616

 990

 800

 698

 678

 574

 489

 452

 423

 371

 1,216

 1,197

 1,181

 1,130

 1,116

 1,089

 1,073

 1,067

 1,072

 1,069

 1,055

 1,064

 1,192

 1,126

 1,090

 1,073

 1,057

 1,061

 1,136

 1,107

 1,025

 878

 451

 402

 491

 489

 425

 400

 367

 341

 327

 1,817

 1,659

 1,522

 1,422

 1,395

 1,338

 1,308

 1,397

 1,451

 1,541

 1,505

 1,919

 1,849

 1,488

 1,407

 1,418

 1,428

 1,656

 1,717

 1,508

 1,248

 1,067

 803

 641

 580

 551

 478

 431

 399

 376

 346

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 23,530

 23,643

 23,520

 23,203

 23,074

 23,082

 23,053

 23,044

 22,857

 22,660

 22,334

 22,237

 21,968

 21,611

 21,201

 20,960

 20,866

 21,100

 21,422

 21,592

 21,532

 21,202

 20,554

 19,654

 18,729

 17,361

 15,990

 14,933

 13,925

 12,883

 11,801

 1,681

 1,689

 1,680

 1,657

 1,648

 1,649

 1,647

 1,646

 1,633

 1,619

 1,595

 1,588

 1,569

 1,544

 1,514

 1,497

 1,490

 1,507

 1,530

 1,542

 1,538

 1,514

 1,468

 1,404

 1,338

 1,240

 1,142

 1,067

 995

 920

 843

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 522.93

 522.79

 522.66

 522.56

 522.53

 522.43

 522.41

 522.30

 522.19

 522.09

 521.91

 521.81

 521.70

 521.49

 521.39

 521.32

 521.84

 522.50

 522.53

 522.65

 522.82

 523.00

 523.07

 523.35

 523.53

 523.65

 523.78

 523.91

 523.96

 524.00

 524.37

 289.5

 289.0

 288.6

 288.2

 288.1

 287.8

 287.7

 287.3

 286.9

 286.6

 286.0

 285.6

 285.2

 284.5

 284.2

 283.9

 285.7

 288.0

 288.1

 288.5

 289.1

 289.8

 290.0

 291.0

 291.6

 292.1

 292.5

 293.0

 293.1

 293.3

 294.6

STORAGE

-0.4

-0.5

-0.5

-0.3

-0.1

-0.3

-0.1

-0.4

-0.4

-0.3

-0.6

-0.3

-0.4

-0.7

-0.3

-0.2

+1.8

+2.3

+0.1

+0.4

+0.6

+0.6

+0.2

+1.0

+0.6

+0.4

+0.5

+0.5

+0.2

+0.1

+1.3

CHANGE

461

364

394

447

562

522

698

543

479

447

302

524

540

379

494

486

1,354

1,627

862

855

763

786

593

938

681

589

674

706

622

567

1,123

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 0

 0

 0

 202

 134

 0

 0

 63

 74

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 267

 243

 243

 242

 242

 306

 351

 351

 287

 241

 241

 304

 349

 348

 285

 240

 80

 101

 242

 152

 91

 101

 41

 0

 0

 0

 80

 102

 165

 131

 92

FRIANT-KERN

 7

 3

 15

 16

 8

 27

 17

 21

 21

 17

 12

 30

 18

 12

 10

 6

 2

 1

 9

 7

 22

 17

 14

 16

 10

 24

 11

 22

 16

 13

 17

C.F.S.

 .06

 .03

 .13

 .14

 .07

 .24

 .15

 .19

 .19

 .15

 .11

 .27

 .16

 .11

 .09

 .05

 .02

 .01

 .08

 .06

 .19

 .15

 .12

 .14

 .09

 .21

 .10

 .19

 .14

 .11

 .15

INCHES

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.62

 .52

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .63

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .33

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4.7 20,382 482 5,918 0 441 3.90 3.46

ACRE-FEET +4,654 40,428 956 11,738 0 875

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 11,738

 956 34,903

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 8.60

 289.9

 22,209 3.46

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 399

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 365

 386

 364

 363

 364

 365

 356

 351

 351

 351

 351

 351

 352

 352

 352

 352

 352

 352

 353

RIVER

 11,197

 22,209

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 414.82

 414.18

 413.30

 412.60

 411.75

 411.24

 410.33

 409.54

 408.87

 407.79

 407.09

 405.94

 405.04

 404.20

 403.19

 402.24

 401.45

 400.79

 399.85

 399.34

 398.54

 397.75

 396.92

 396.22

 395.52

 394.80

 394.15

 393.34

 392.54

 391.96

 391.44

 645,596

 640,100

 632,571

 626,606

 619,391

 615,077

 607,408

 600,779

 595,179

 586,193

 580,396

 570,919

 563,543

 556,691

 548,494

 540,826

 534,480

 529,199

 521,712

 517,667

 511,345

 505,130

 498,632

 493,175

 487,741

 482,175

 477,170

 470,961

 464,858

 460,451

 456,514

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,788

 2,577

 2,574

 2,469

 2,467

 0

 3,731

 3,743

 2,022

 3,768

 3,628

 3,622

 3,667

 3,696

 5,943

 5,994

 3,744

 3,761

 3,783

 1,267

 3,802

 3,080

 5,044

 3,871

 3,910

 3,864

 1,171

 4,632

 3,587

 3,149

 2,339

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL October 10, 2014

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2014 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -198,397 104,693 3,624 -107,500

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-9,315

-5,496

-7,529

-5,965

-7,215

-4,314

-7,669

-6,629

-5,600

-8,986

-5,797

-9,477

-7,376

-6,852

-8,197

-7,668

-6,346

-5,281

-7,487

-4,045

-6,322

-6,215

-6,498

-5,457

-5,434

-5,566

-5,005

-6,209

-6,103

-4,407

-3,937

 340

 97

 109

 106

 110

 115

 115

 115

 113

 117

 108

 112

 116

 117

 119

 116

 66

 110

 116

 116

 110

 98

 100

 100

 110

 108

 114

 116

 112

 112

 111

-3,954

-2,696

-2,657

-2,570

-2,499

-77

-3,802

-3,809

-2,141

-3,882

-3,784

-3,624

-3,738

-3,855

-5,965

-6,079

-3,766

-3,906

-3,801

-1,424

-3,881

-3,240

-5,090

-3,930

-3,953

-3,986

-1,259

-4,786

-3,658

-3,380

-2,308

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 392,358

 389,662

 387,005

 384,435

 381,936

 381,859

 378,057

 374,248

 372,107

 368,225

 364,441

 360,817

 357,079

 353,224

 347,259

 341,180

 337,414

 333,508

 329,707

 328,283

 324,402

 321,162

 316,072

 312,142

 308,189

 304,203

 302,944

 298,158

 294,500

 291,120

 288,812

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 396,312

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony ADAMS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6097.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

*237, , , 4 „ ^ „ Anthony Adams, Appellant Pro Se. R*ud*olf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Adams’ motion to place the case in abeyance, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional Drocess

*DISMISSED.*
### §3451. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78

Section, Pub. L. 103–182, title IV, §415, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2148; Pub. L. 104–295, §21(c)(4), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3530, set out effects of termination of NAFTA country status and transition provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the date on which the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020), see section 601 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under former section 3301 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 351

 350

 348

 359

 373

 366

 357

 355

 350

 349

 356

 357

 352

 335

 381

 379

 368

 355

 356

 350

 352

 350

 354

 355

 366

 363

 370

 397

 407

 432

 454

 313

 315

 305

 317

 314

 317

 313

 307

 303

 302

 298

 322

 288

 285

 294

 316

 324

 322

 321

 320

 320

 324

 318

 319

 324

 330

 338

 334

 332

 346

 349

 333

 335

 333

 337

 339

 337

 332

 329

 327

 331

 333

 339

 324

 308

 330

 339

 342

 338

 338

 336

 337

 338

 334

 337

 343

 350

 356

 364

 375

 387

 397

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CCFNB BANCORP, INC.
 CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this amended report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this amended report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d  15 (e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (c)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (d)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. Arnold, CPA, CIAChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                              UNITED BANCORP, INC.
                                    EXHIBITS


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Everson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James W. Everson


James W. Everson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002



                                                                              31
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 521.35

 520.78

 520.42

 519.70

 518.97

 518.12

 517.16

 516.51

 515.87

 514.95

 514.14

 513.72

 513.53

 513.15

 512.99

 512.41

 512.10

 511.80

 511.81

 512.03

 512.22

 512.31

 512.40

 512.31

 512.20

 512.14

 511.90

 511.65

 511.68

 511.76

 511.89

 284.0

 282.0

 280.8

 278.3

 275.8

 273.0

 269.7

 267.5

 265.4

 262.3

 259.7

 258.3

 257.7

 256.4

 255.9

 254.0

 253.0

 252.1

 252.1

 252.8

 253.4

 253.7

 254.0

 253.7

 253.3

 253.2

 252.4

 251.6

 251.7

 251.9

 252.3

STORAGE

-2.1

-2.0

-1.2

-2.5

-2.5

-2.9

-3.2

-2.2

-2.1

-3.1

-2.7

-1.4

-0.6

-1.2

-0.5

-1.9

-1.0

-1.0

+0.0

+0.7

+0.6

+0.3

+0.3

-0.3

-0.4

-0.2

-0.8

-0.8

+0.1

+0.3

+0.4

CHANGE

1,044

1,194

1,559

851

484

19

-62

635

909

470

442

729

857

736

1,291

768

1,263

1,235

1,354

1,377

1,418

1,487

1,797

1,801

1,912

1,835

1,133

1,021

1,580

1,795

1,977

INFLOW

 475

 473

 471

 440

 380

 346

 370

 362

 324

 274

 82

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,316

 1,406

 1,408

 1,350

 1,097

 836

 902

 1,065

 1,358

 1,440

 1,404

 1,131

 868

 1,044

 1,249

 1,422

 1,472

 1,420

 1,016

 689

 765

 997

 1,313

 1,622

 1,772

 1,622

 1,210

 1,110

 1,221

 1,365

 1,467

FRIANT-KERN

 52

 58

 55

 58

 17

 44

 50

 58

 56

 45

 53

 43

 53

 70

 56

 46

 49

 46

 53

 49

 52

 53

 55

 56

 50

 41

 44

 47

 40

 42

 49

C.F.S.

 .46

 .52

 .49

 .52

 .15

 .40

 .46

 .54

 .52

 .42

 .50

 .41

 .50

 .66

 .53

 .44

 .47

 .44

 .51

 .47

 .50

 .51

 .52

 .53

 .48

 .39

 .42

 .45

 .38

 .40

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2022 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -33.8 34,911 3,997 38,357 0 1,540 14.46 .04

ACRE-FEET -33,755 69,246 7,928 76,081 0 3,055

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 76,081

 7,928 99,946

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2022 TO DATE = 0.04

 286.1

 15,937 0.04

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 250

 250

 250

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 250

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 257

 269

 282

 290

 290

 282

 270

 270

 270

 270

 270

 270

 258

 250

RIVER

 8,035

 15,937

RIVER

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 8.30
1

Fallon, Gail

From: Jay Baker <jbaker@utah.gov>

Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:44 PM

To: Fallon, Gail

Subject: Re: Question about PacifiCorp BART reports

Gail, 

You are correct. That is the Five-Factor Analysis Update document that should be part of the June 2015 TSD 

submittal. I apologize for not getting it on the CD. 

Jay Baker 

Utah Division of Air Quality 

(801) 536-4015 

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Fallon, Gail <fallon.gail@epa.gov> wrote: 

Hi Jay – The attached table of contents that was provided on one of the SIP disks Utah submitted in June 

shows the below item in TSD Chapter 2 which is not included on the TSD disk: 

 

 “2.e) Utah Five-Factor BART Analysis Update” 

 

I believe we received this from your office last September and have attached the document to this message. I 

assume Utah’s intention was to include this updated BART analysis with the June 2015 documents and that it 

was just inadvertently omitted from the disk. Please confirm. 

 

Thanks, 

Gail 

 

Gail Fallon 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Quality Planning Unit 

US EPA, Region 8 

Denver, CO 

(303) 312-6281
2
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection Division of Consumer & Business Education

1-877-FTC-HELP FOR THE CONSUMER

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ftc.gov

August 2009

Have You Been Bamboozled

by Bamboo Fabrics?

Looking to be a more environmentally conscious shopper? You’ve probably heard 

about bamboo. Bamboo stands out for its ability to grow quickly with little or no need for 

pesticides, and it is used in a variety of products, from flooring to furniture. But when it 

comes to soft bamboo textiles, like shirts or sheets, there’s a catch: they’re actually rayon. 

The Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, wants you to 

know that the soft “bamboo” fabrics on the market today are rayon. They are made using 

toxic chemicals in a process that releases pollutants into the air. Extracting bamboo fibers 

is expensive and time-consuming, and textiles made just from bamboo fiber don’t feel silky 

smooth.

There’s also no evidence that rayon made from bamboo retains the antimicrobial 

properties of the bamboo plant, as some sellers and manufacturers claim. Even when 

bamboo is the “plant source” used to create rayon, no traits of the original plant are left in 

the finished product. 

Companies that claim a product is “bamboo” should have reliable evidence, like 

scientific tests and analyses, to show that it’s made of actual bamboo fiber. 

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business 

practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and 

avoid them. To file a complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, visit ftc.gov

or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC 

enters consumer complaints into the Consumer Sentinel Network, a secure online database 

and investigative tool used by hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in 

the U.S. and abroad.
(No. 73—CC—18

#### Joseph Caten, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Dr. Joseph Caten, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
(No. 77-CC-1013

#### Eadie E. Skaggs, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed August 15, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*229It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.