alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.222 Notice of brewer. ( a ) *Beer to be destroyed.* When a brewer possesses beer which has been taxpaid or tax determined and which the brewer wishes to destroy at a location other than at any of the brewer's breweries, the brewer shall give written notice of intention to destroy the beer. The brewer must submit this notice to the appropriate TTB officer.
( b ) *Execution of notice.* The brewer shall serially number each notice and execute each notice under penalties of perjury as defined in § 25.11. The brewer shall specify the date on which the beer is to be destroyed; this date may not be less than 12 days from the date the notice is mailed or delivered to the appropriate TTB officer.
( c ) *Information to be furnished.* The notice will contain the following information: ( 1 ) The number and sizes of kegs and the actual quantity of beer, in barrels; or the number of cases and the number and sizes of bottles within the cases, and the actual quantity of beer in barrels. When kegs containing less than the actual contents are to be destroyed, the brewer shall determine the actual content of beer by weight or by other accurate means.
( 2 ) The date on which the beer was received for destruction.
( 3 ) A statement that the tax on the beer has been fully paid or determined and the rate at which the tax on the beer was paid or determined.
( 4 ) If the title of the beer has passed, the name and address of the person returning the beer.
( 5 ) The location at which the brewer desires to destroy the beer and the reason for not returning the beer to the brewery.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1335, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5056))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5479, Jan. 19, 2001]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Danilo Cacciamatta, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Form10-K of ConectiSys Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposesin accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
### Part B—Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part B consisting of sections 1103 to 1103g was redesignated part C by Pub. L. 110–315, title V, §502(a)(1), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3331.

Another prior part B consisted of sections 1103 to 1103g and related to National Teacher Academies prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–244.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,194.85

 1,194.83

 1,194.81

 1,194.79

 1,194.79

 1,194.77

 1,194.76

 1,194.75

 1,194.78

 1,194.77

 1,194.77

 1,194.76

 1,194.77

 1,194.76

 1,194.76

 1,194.82

 1,194.83

 1,194.82

 1,194.82

 1,194.82

 1,194.85

 1,194.86

 1,194.88

 1,194.89

 1,194.90

 1,194.91

 1,194.91

 1,194.91

 1,194.92

 1,194.92

 42.56

 42.53

 42.50

 42.47

 42.47

 42.43

 42.42

 42.40

 42.45

 42.43

 42.43

 42.42

 42.43

 42.42

 42.42

 42.52

 42.53

 42.52

 42.52

 42.52

 42.56

 42.58

 42.61

 42.63

 42.65

 42.66

 42.66

 42.66

 42.68

 42.68

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

+0.00

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

+0.05

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.10

+0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.05

+0.02

+0.03

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

13

3

4

-5

4

-12

-5

-3

31

-1

5

-5

14

-2

5

53

16

-4

5

4

26

11

19

12

11

14

7

4

12

5

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 16

 16

 16

 8

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 6

 3

 5

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 5

 6

 4

 3

 4

 6

 4

 3

 6

 4

 4

 3

 0

 1

 2

 2

 2

 5

 6

 3

 2

 4

C.F.S.

 .12

 .06

 .10

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .09

 .11

 .08

 .06

 .07

 .11

 .07

 .06

 .11

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .10

 .12

 .05

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .40

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2017 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/06/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.11 241 82 0 110 2.03 .90

ACRE-FEET +110 478 163 0 218

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 163

 163

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .90

JULY 1, 2017 .95

 42.58

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = .95
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 396.09

 395.79

 395.53

 395.31

 395.06

 394.82

 394.48

 394.09

 393.91

 393.78

 393.91

 394.03

 394.07

 394.01

 393.91

 393.81

 393.49

 393.25

 393.09

 392.86

 392.63

 392.48

 392.28

 392.05

 391.86

 391.64

 391.78

 391.77

 391.72

 391.65

 354.0

 352.1

 350.5

 349.1

 347.5

 346.0

 343.9

 341.4

 340.3

 339.5

 340.3

 341.0

 341.3

 340.9

 340.3

 339.7

 337.7

 336.2

 335.2

 333.8

 332.4

 331.5

 330.3

 328.9

 327.7

 326.4

 327.3

 327.2

 326.9

 326.5

STORAGE

-1.4

-1.9

-1.6

-1.4

-1.6

-1.5

-2.1

-2.4

-1.1

-0.8

+0.8

+0.7

+0.3

-0.4

-0.6

-0.6

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-1.4

-1.4

-0.9

-1.2

-1.4

-1.1

-1.3

+0.8

-0.1

-0.3

-0.4

CHANGE

1,125

731

966

987

839

833

536

527

1,110

1,297

1,874

1,870

1,653

1,471

1,356

1,338

1,176

1,213

1,336

1,190

1,166

1,441

1,332

1,259

1,290

1,175

2,327

1,669

1,636

1,684

INFLOW

 1,649

 1,516

 1,611

 1,515

 1,472

 1,438

 1,475

 1,613

 1,558

 1,595

 1,365

 1,399

 1,430

 1,545

 1,550

 1,542

 2,064

 1,855

 1,732

 1,794

 1,741

 1,775

 1,834

 1,841

 1,755

 1,731

 1,799

 1,595

 1,672

 1,784

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 168

 163

 162

 162

 160

 136

 113

 112

 98

 99

 96

 93

 87

 105

 109

 96

 96

 95

 96

 98

 105

 105

 105

 105

 104

 104

 99

 104

 96

 93

PUMPING

 17

 11

 21

 11

 4

 17

 19

 17

 17

 8

 8

 4

 10

 10

 8

 12

 12

 10

 6

 8

 27

 22

 8

 20

 10

 8

 4

 0

 20

 20

C.F.S.

 .08

 .05

 .10

 .05

 .02

 .08

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .13

 .11

 .04

 .10

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .10

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .79

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .56

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.42

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -28.8 38,407 49,245 0 14 3,364 369 1.80 3.17

ACRE-FEET -28,800 76,180 97,677 0 28 6,672 732

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 97,677

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 6,672

TOTAL 104,377

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 7.31

 355.4

OUTLET 28 3.17

Table 11
March 2024

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

48.76

1 1,198.49 48.76 0.00 207 0 201 6 0.11 0.03

2 1,198.71 49.15 0.39 645 0 443 5 0.08 0.58

3 1,198.71 49.15 0.00 446 0 443 3 0.06 0.07

4 1,198.64 49.02 -0.13 300 0 360 3 0.06 0.01

5 1,198.61 48.97 -0.05 303 0 326 4 0.07 0.00

6 1,198.65 49.04 0.07 407 0 371 0 0.00 0.07

7 1,198.67 49.08 0.04 415 0 395 2 0.03 0.55

8 1,198.62 48.99 -0.09 298 0 337 6 0.10 0.00

9 1,198.58 48.92 -0.07 264 0 292 8 0.14 0.00

10 1,198.55 48.86 -0.05 239 0 260 6 0.11 0.00

11 1,198.54 48.85 -0.02 246 0 250 5 0.09 0.07

12 1,198.52 48.81 -0.04 218 0 230 6 0.10 0.01

13 1,198.52 48.81 45.04 22,941 0 230 3 0.06 0.01

14 1,198.49 48.76 -0.05 181 0 201 7 0.13 0.00

15 1,198.49 48.76 0.00 214 0 201 13 0.23 0.00

16 1,198.48 48.74 -0.02 192 0 191 10 0.17 0.00

17 1,198.47 48.72 -0.02 180 0 182 7 0.12 0.00

18 1,198.47 48.72 0.00 189 0 182 7 0.12 0.00

19 1,198.46 48.71 -0.02 173 0 173 9 0.16 0.00

20 1,198.45 48.69 -0.02 159 0 164 4 0.07 0.00

21 1,198.44 48.67 -0.02 155 0 155 9 0.15 0.00

22 1,198.43 48.65 -0.02 143 0 147 5 0.09 0.00

23 1,198.44 48.67 0.02 170 0 155 6 0.11 0.00

24 1,198.43 48.65 -0.02 143 0 147 5 0.09 0.00

25 1,198.43 48.65 0.00 152 0 147 5 0.08 0.00

26 1,198.42 48.63 -0.02 133 0 138 4 0.07 0.00

27 1,198.41 48.62 -0.02 125 0 130 4 0.07 0.00

28 1,198.43 48.65 0.04 172 0 147 7 0.13 0.11

29 1,198.43 48.65 0.00 153 0 147 6 0.10 0.00

30 1,198.61 48.97 0.32 488 0 326 2 0.03 1.02

31 1,198.66 49.06 0.09 431 0 383 3 0.05 0.04

TOTALS 45.33 30,482 0 7,454 170 2.98 2.57

ACRE-FEET 45,330 60,461 0 14,785 337

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

 Data based on 24 hour period ending 0800.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 14,785

Total 14,785

Precipitation

This month = 2.57

October 01, 2023 To date = 22.93

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

East Park Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/23/2024
No. 12,047.

#### Mongone, et al. *v.*The People.

Decided October 29, 1928.

*517Mr. Lewis D. Mowry, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. William W. Gaunt, Assistant, for tlie people.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

Proceeding under chapter 136, C. L. 1921, which is an act concerning nuisances, the district attorney filed this action in equity to abate and prevent, and perpetually to enjoin, the defendants Emma Gaskins and Lena Mon-gone, owners, and Mike Mongone, tenant, of a building, from conducting or maintaining a nuisance therein. Upon final hearing the court found that a nuisance had been conducted and maintained therein. At the time the action was brought the defendant Gaskins was living in the state of California and was not served with notice or process, and did not appear in the action either in person or by attorney and no service by publication was made or attempted. The two Mongones have sued out this writ of error for a review of the judgment of abatement as against them; and Emma G-askins, one of the owners of the building, by a separate writ of error is also here on error for the purpose of reviewing the judgment in so far as it affects her as owner. We are now concerned only with the judgment against the Mongones.

*518Certain objections that were made at the outset to the ruling, of the trial court as to the sufficiency of the complaint, taken by motion and special demurrer, are not before us for review, as they were waived by answering over. The complaint is ■ not defective. It well pleads a good cause of action in equity for the abatement of a nuisance. Objection is made also to the granting of a temporary writ of injunction. Whether or not error was committed in that respect is of no consequence, at this time, if the final decree of abatement as to the Mongones was proper, as we think it was. We have examined this record and find the evidence abundantly sufficient to sustain the allegation of the complaint of the existence and maintenance of a nuisance on the premises.

The point that the premises were not sufficiently identified'by the evidence is not tenable. While the complaint describes the premises by lots and block, there was no direct evidence that the land itself upon which the building stood and in which the nuisance was maintained, corresponded with the legal description; but the location was pointed out as the southwest corner of two certain streets and it was thus sufficiently identified as the premises described in the complaint. This statute has been held a valid statute by us in *Gregg v. People, 65*Colo. 390, 176 Pac. 483. Proof being sufficient to sustain the allegation as to a nuisance conducted and maintained by the Mongones, the injunction order of abatement was properly rendered as to them and the decree so declaring is therefore affirmed.
No. 20830.

#### George L. Ray *v.*John M. Schooley and James Slavin.

(396 P.2d 730)

Decided November 23, 1964.

George T. Ashen, Thomas C. Singer, for plaintiff in error.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, John E. Bush, Assistant, for defendants in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

This action in the trial court was upon a habeas corpus petition in which the respondents, defendants in error, were John M. Schooley, as Manager of Safety and Ex-Officio Sheriff of the City and County of Denver, and James Slavin, as Chief of Police of the City and County of Denver.

Upon plaintiff in error’s failure to move for substitution of the successors in office for the named de*34fendants in error, as provided in'Rule 25 (d), Colo. R.C.P., and pursuant to our holding in *Bach v.*Schooley, 155 Colo. 30, 392 P.2d 649, writ of error is dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice McWilliams and Mr. Justice Pringle concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 583.49

 583.92

 584.63

 585.63

 586.32

 585.55

 584.01

 584.03

 584.29

 583.39

 583.30

 584.39

 585.10

 584.92

 584.56

 583.95

 583.33

 582.88

 582.98

 584.02

 584.33

 583.70

 584.04

 583.96

 584.26

 584.30

 585.45

 584.99

 583.95

 583.19

 581.06

 21,580

 21,841

 22,279

 22,903

 23,339

 22,852

 21,896

 21,909

 22,069

 21,520

 21,465

 22,131

 22,570

 22,458

 22,236

 21,860

 21,483

 21,211

 21,271

 21,902

 22,094

 21,708

 21,915

 21,866

 22,050

 22,075

 22,790

 22,501

 21,860

 21,398

 20,135

STORAGE

+381

+261

+438

+624

+436

-487

-956

+13

+160

-549

-55

+666

+439

-112

-222

-376

-377

-272

+60

+631

+192

-386

+207

-49

+184

+25

+715

-289

-641

-462

-1,263

CHANGE

9,217

9,213

9,221

9,316

9,362

8,160

7,104

7,607

7,636

7,113

7,597

7,889

7,796

8,466

9,114

8,925

9,134

9,052

9,138

9,612

9,190

8,940

9,270

9,116

9,216

9,175

9,670

8,895

8,561

8,645

8,390

INFLOW

 8,937

 8,995

 8,913

 8,915

 9,057

 8,318

 7,499

 7,511

 7,465

 7,300

 7,533

 7,460

 7,487

 8,430

 9,138

 9,023

 9,233

 9,100

 9,015

 9,200

 9,002

 9,044

 9,075

 9,050

 9,033

 9,069

 9,221

 8,950

 8,791

 8,787

 8,936

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 3

 1

 2

 1

 0

 3

 2

 4

 5

 5

 7

 8

 3

 7

 3

 7

 6

 4

 8

 9

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 8

 4

 6

 8

 6

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2009

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,064 269,740 267,487 0 2,635 155

ACRE-FEET -1,064 535,029 530,560 0 5,227 307

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 530,560

SPILL 0

 21,199

FISH TRAP 5,227

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 48

 1,018

 1,859

 1,819

 1,796

 1,749

 572

 69

 239

 492

 171

 306

 866

 939

 1,101

 220

 70

 45

 55

 187

 250

 85

 84

 82

 82

 170

 267

 44

 14

 32

 82

 14,813

 29,382

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 8,781

 7,339

 6,075

 6,246

 5,909

 5,373

 5,874

 6,923

 6,732

 6,177

 6,951

 7,080

 6,530

 7,002

 7,246

 8,331

 8,410

 8,350

 8,451

 8,662

 8,437

 8,423

 8,543

 8,449

 8,542

 8,346

 8,699

 8,613

 8,383

 8,465

 8,134

 235,476

 467,067
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 209

 217

 216

 222

 224

 236

 249

 256

 264

 284

 287

 305

 307

 306

 313

 326

 318

 322

 325

 320

 333

 348

 357

 368

 355

 370

 358

 344

 334

 331

 329

 196

 197

 198

 200

 192

 209

 217

 220

 226

 231

 241

 257

 265

 264

 267

 269

 269

 263

 241

 245

 259

 262

 271

 270

 249

 277

 287

 289

 289

 293

 292

 201

 205

 206

 211

 214

 220

 229

 236

 244

 255

 264

 275

 284

 279

 285

 293

 291

 289

 281

 279

 289

 297

 305

 307

 302

 319

 321

 313

 313

 312

 308

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
#### Harry Levy v. Union Smoked Fish Company.

Motion denied, with leave to renew as stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### subpart 2—allocations
(No. 74-CC-241

#### Cities Service Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 8, 1974.*

Cities Service Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Godfrey Hui Chin Tong, the Chief Executive Officer of Teda Travel Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:

May 20, 2003

/s/  Godfrey Hui Chin Tong

Name:

Godfrey Hui Chin Tong

Title:

Chief Executive Officer
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 81327          Scale: 49,998          Edition: 4          Edition Date: 13-APR-96          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1996/26**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **