alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              119
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    119
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25,239
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         10,775
<OTHER-SE>                                      (26,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        119
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    24,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (24,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (24,207)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.02)



</TABLE>
481 P.2d 400

#### E-L SKIP TRACING AND COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. STEIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9122.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1971.

Motion for Leave to File Second Rehearing Denied March 19, 1971.

Charles J. Stein, pro se.

J. Stephen Gammill, Albuquerque, for appellee.

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This cause originated in the Small Claims Court of Bernalillo County on an account, and the decisive question presented is whether the appellant’s appeal to the district court was timely. We conclude it was not.

Section 16-5-12, N.M.S.A.1953, states in part:

> “Appeals to district court.- — -Any person aggrieved by any decision of any such small claims court, may appeal to the district court of the county in which such decision has been rendered, or order or judgment made, by filing within thirty (30) days of the entry of same, a motion praying for an appeal; and upon the allowance of same, shall within ten (10) days thereafter, file an appeal bond with two [2] or more sureties, conditioned that such appellant shall prosecute his appeal with diligence and effect and pay all costs of such appeal as shall be lawfully adjudged against him; such bond shall be approved in writing by the judge of such court; * *

Summary judgment was entered by the small claims court on June 2, 1969. On July 1, 1969, appellant moved for the allowance of an appeal to the district court. The order granting the motion and fixing the amount of the appeal bond was entered by the small claims court on July 7, 1969, but no appeal bond was filed within 10 days thereafter. The district court entered judgment affirming the judgment of the small claims court and appellant has appealed.

The requirements of § 16-5-12, supra, are mandatory, and timely compliance therewith is jurisdictional. See Chavez v. Village of Cimarron, 65 N.M. 141, 333 P.2d 882.

The judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

TACKETT and STEPHENSON, JJ.,' concur.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Summary of 2015 Performance Bonus Program 

The following is a summary description of the terms and conditions with respect to the potential cash performance bonuses for the
Company’s “named executive officers” (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission) (the “NEOs”) as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. 
 All Company non-sales-commissioned employees, including the NEOs, are eligible for performance bonuses under the 2015 Bonus
Program. The bonus payout for each eligible employee is determined based on the employee’s eligible salary multiplied by his or her bonus % multiplied by a corporate achievement factor for 2015 and an individual performance factor, with the
corporate achievement factor ranging from 0% to 200%, and with the individual performance factor ranging from 0% to 100% (with exceptions above 100%) and determined by the evaluation of each individual employee performance. 

Corporate goals for 2015 are further weighted 50% on revenue, 40% on non-GAAP operating income and 10% on non-GAAP free cash flow. The
corporate achievement factors for revenue, non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP free cash flow are independently determined based upon pre-established threshold, target and maximum goals. 

The 2015 Bonus Program is designed to reward, through the payment of annual cash bonuses, the Company’s employees (including executive
officers) for the Company’s performance in meeting certain key corporate objectives for 2015 and, if applicable, each individual’s performance and contribution in meeting the Company’s corporate objectives for the year. The actual
cash bonus awarded in any year, if any, may be more or less than each employee’s annual bonus target, and shall be subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. For the Company’s executive officers, the
target bonuses, and whether or not a bonus is paid in any year, is within the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for Education and Human Resources 
(<greek-i>1119).
    Date/Time: May 4, 2011; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; May 5, 2011; 8:30 a.m. 
to 1 p.m.
    Place: The Arlington Hilton, 950 North Stafford Street, Gallery II, 
Mezzanine Level, Arlington, VA 22203.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: James Colby, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-5331, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e747d71727c675e706d7830797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f9f0fcfff1ead3fde0f5bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice with respect to the 
Foundation's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) 
education and human resources programming.

Agenda

May 4, 2011 (Wednesday)

    Report from the NSF Assistant Director for Education and Human 
Resources.
    Update on Strategic Vision Working Groups:
    <bullet> Putting the ``STEM'' in STEM Education.
    <bullet> Preparing and Sustaining K-12 STEM Educators.
    <bullet> Preparing and Shaping the STEM Workforce.
    Overview and Discussion: FY 2012 Budget Request.
    Visit with NSF Director and Deputy Director.

May 5, 2011 (Thursday)

    Receipt of Committee of Visitor Reports for:
    <bullet> Math and Science Partnership program.
    <bullet> Federal Cyber Service: Scholarship for Service program.
    <bullet> NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and 
Mathematics.
    Discussion of future STEM program planning.
    Adjournment.

    Dated: April 7, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8723 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(No. 74-CC-465

#### Chicago Police Department, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1974.*

Richard L. Curry, Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**Exhibit 10.10**

 

**THIS NOTE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THAT CERTAIN SUBORDINATIONAGREEMENT BETWEEN WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION,AND HOLDER DATED OF EVEN DATE HEREWITH.**

 

 

**PROMISSORY NOTE**

 
| US$1,000,000 |   | Burlingame, California |
|--------------|--------|------------------------|
|         |   | July 26, 2005     |

 

**FOR VALUE RECEIVED**,OPTA SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Maker”) with itsprincipal office in Scottdale, Arizona, USA hereby promises to pay to TCLMULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LIMITED, a Cayman Islands company (“Holder”)with its principal office in Hong Kong, at 13/F, TCL Tower, 8 Tai Chung Road,Tsuen Wan, N.T., Hong Kong, or at such other place as Holder may from time totime designate, the principal sum of one million United States dollars($1,000,000), plus interest at the rate of 0.257% per month.

 

The principal sum and any then accrued but unpaidinterest hereunder shall be due and payable in full on January 26,2006.  Any and all payments due hereundershall be payable in lawful money of the United States and shall be creditedfirst to accrued interest and then to principal.  Failure to make any timely payment shall bedeemed an event of default hereunder Presentment for payment, notice ofdishonor, protest and notice of protest are expressly waived.  Maker may pay any part or all of the amountdue hereunder at any time or from time to time without penalty, premium orbonus.

 

Maker agrees to secure its obligations to Holder underthis Note pursuant to a Security Agreement entered into herewith between Holderand Maker on the effective date of this Note.

 

This Note may not be assigned without prior writtenconsent of the other party.

 

This Note shall begoverned by and the provisions herein to be construed in accordance with thelaws of the State of California without regard to any conflict of lawprinciples.

 
|   | **MAKER**:            |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | Opta Systems,  LLC    |
|   |                  |   |
|   | /s/ David Xiong,  CEO |   |

 

----
(1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Shuang WangName:
    Shuang WangTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
(principal executive officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 361.10

 361.10

 361.10

 361.10

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.10

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.10

 361.07

 361.10

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.07

 361.10

 361.07

 360.52

 360.22

 360.24

 360.22

 614

 614

 614

 614

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 614

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 614

 612

 614

 612

 612

 612

 612

 614

 612

 573

 552

 554

 552

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

-39

-21

+2

-2

CHANGE

 446

 442

 421

 435

 449

 452

 434

 409

 415

 422

 412

 401

 411

 419

 425

 438

 466

 463

 456

 444

 430

 418

 404

 402

 419

 402

 385

 415

 426

 425

 413

 2,009

 2,000

 2,034

 1,883

 2,018

 2,027

 2,051

 2,026

 2,019

 2,024

 2,030

 2,036

 2,027

 2,012

 1,984

 2,011

 2,011

 2,019

 2,037

 2,032

 2,030

 2,016

 2,021

 2,008

 2,000

 2,017

 2,037

 1,468

 468

 400

 405

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2011

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -62 0 57,160 13,199

ACRE-FEET -62 0 113,377 26,180

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 61,937

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 26,180

 201,494

 614

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 3,802

 3,757

 3,711

 3,737

 3,749

 3,751

 3,720

 3,628

 3,539

 3,502

 3,476

 3,458

 3,462

 3,530

 3,524

 3,547

 3,599

 3,644

 3,648

 3,617

 3,577

 3,564

 3,501

 3,454

 3,445

 3,478

 3,361

 2,953

 1,957

 1,891

 1,838

 105,420

 209,101

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 113,377

 1,110

 1,030

 1,000

 1,221

 1,156

 1,116

 1,097

 1,067

 975

 933

 926

 930

 932

 1,001

 984

 994

 1,021

 1,053

 1,061

 1,057

 1,046

 1,047

 977

 945

 928

 946

 944

 946

 939

 944

 900

 31,226

 61,937

RIVER CANALS
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.31 Applicable laws and regulations; persons liable for tax. ( a ) All laws and regulations regarding alcohol or rum that is not denatured, including those requiring payment of the distilled spirits tax, apply to completely denatured alcohol, specially denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum, or articles produced, withdrawn, sold, transported, or used in violation of laws or regulations pertaining to those substances.
( b ) Any person who produces, withdraws, sells, transports, or uses completely denatured alcohol, specially denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum, or articles in violation of laws or regulations shall be required to pay the distilled spirits tax on those substances.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1314, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5001))
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00193

- CV

John Koo Hyun Kim, Appellant

v.

David Evans, Yew Doh Young, David A. Wr ight, Miles White, Mark Tammen, Kewn Shin Young, Jin Rim Hyung, Seok O. Won, K im Roy Moon Seok, Chol Moon In, Jai Kyung Lee, Min Chong Lee, Sun Bai K im, Hong Il Kim, Sang Wuk Kang,

John Judson, Rashall Hunter, et al., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PURYEAR AN D GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREF ORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs relating

to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below ; and that this decision be certified below for

observance.
#### Charles D. Tate v. State of Nebraska.

Filed March 8, 1899.

No. 10542.

Unlawful Sale of Intoxicating Liquor: Conviction: Review: Evidence. No legal question of any novelty is involved in this case. Evidence *lielcL*to .sustain a conviction, instructions to be founded on the evidence, and certain evidence to be material and its admission not error.

Error to the district court for Cherry county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Clarice & Tuelcer,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. J. Smyth, Attorney General,*and *W. D. Oldham, Deputy Attorney General,*for the state.

Irvine, C.

The plaintiff in error asks a reversal of a judgment whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for two years for the offense of selling intoxicating liquor to an Indian *297not a citizen. The chief reason advanced for reversal is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. The evidence has been examined and found ample to sustain the conviction.

. One instruction is criticised as not founded on any proof. There is some proof whereon to found it, and, moreover, it was not excepted to, nor is the giving of it assigned as error.

It is assigned as error that the court erred in admitting evidence of the defendant’s occupation. The evidence on the point was to the effect that he was employed in a house of prostitution. To some of this evidence there was no objection, but it was admissible, if for no other reason, because the witnesses for the state had sworn that the liquor had been procured through visiting the house referred to; that the defendant followed them from the •house and handed them the liquor a short distance away. To show that the defendant was connected with the establishment tended in some degree to aid the proof.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Your Domain.com (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer

 

May 20, 2005
#### Sam Birnbaum, Respondent-Appellant, v. Jamestown Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Plaintiff was injured in a collision between a trolley car which he was operating and a truck owned by one De Lillo. After recovering a judgment against De Lillo, which remained unsatisfied, plaintiff instituted the instant action against defendant, De Lillo’s insurance carrier, as provided by section 167 of the Insurance Law. Defendant disclaimed liability on the ground that at the time of the accident the truck was not being used as provided in the policy, but was being used for another purpose not covered thereby. Plaintiff and defendant each moved for summary judgment, and both parties appeal from the denial of their motions. On plaintiff’s appeal, order insofar as it denies his motion for summary judgment, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. On defendant’s appeal, order insofar as it denies its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The affidavits present no factual issues. It is undisputed that' at the time of the accident the insured’s truck was being used to transport lumber for one Watson. The occupation of the insured, as stated in the declarations in the policy, was “Delivery of Coal — Hudson Fuel Co.” By a typewritten indorsement attached to the policy, it was agreed that all commercial automobiles owned and operated by the insured were' "to be used in hauling exclusively for Hudson Fuel Co.” That indorsement superseded the printed provision of the policy which defined commercial use as use “ principally in the business occupation ” of the insured, “ including occasional use for * * * *904other business purposes.” (Cf. *Thompson-Starrett Co.*v. *Amer. Mut. L. Ins. Co.,*276 N. Y. 266.) Coverage was limited to the use set forth in the indorsement by plain and unambiguous language. As the truck was not being used for the agreed purposes at the time involved herein, defendant is not liable under its policy. Plaintiff, an injured third party, has no greater rights against the insurer than are possessed by the insured. *(Devitt*v. *Continental Casualty Co.,*269 N. Y. 474, 479.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 973.]
```

[House Report 112-382]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     112-382

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE 
  BILL (H.R. 658) TO AMEND TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE, TO AUTHORIZE 
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 
2011 THROUGH 2014, TO STREAMLINE PROGRAMS, CREATE EFFICIENCIES, REDUCE 
  WASTE, AND IMPROVE AVIATION SAFETY AND CAPACITY, TO PROVIDE STABLE 
    FUNDING FOR THE NATIONAL AVIATION SYSTEM, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

  February 1, 2012.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Webster, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 533]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 533, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of the conference 
report to accompany H.R. 658, the FAA Reauthorization and 
Reform Act of 2011. The resolution waives all points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration. 
The resolution provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read. Finally, the resolution provides that the 
previous question shall be considered as ordered without 
intervention of any motion except one hour of debate and one 
motion to recommit if applicable.

                         explanation of waivers

    The waiver of all points of order against the conference 
report and its consideration includes a waiver of clause 9 of 
rule XXII, which prohibits the inclusion of matter in a 
conference report not committed to the conference by either 
House.

                                  

```