alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                               0
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0
<PP&E>                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                613
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             9,975
<OTHER-SE>                           (10,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         0
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     0
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     4,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (4,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (4,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         (4,986)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Scarsdale Company, Appellant, for an Order Directing the Payment by the County Treasurer of Westchester County of Money Deposited to Discharge a Certain Alleged Mechanic's Lien Filed by Yerks & Company, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Appeal by the Scarsdale Company from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 6th day of September, 1913, denying its motion to direct the county treasurer of Westchester county to pay to said Scarsdale Company the sum of $2,684.99 with interest, etc.

Jenks, P. J.:

The appellant contends that it paid the money in controversy to the county treasurer by mistake on the supposition that it was required to discharge a mechanic’s lien. The contention of one of the respondents is that in any event such payment in effect was an equitable assignment of certain moneys due to them perforce of an order upon the appellant by debtors of the said respondent. I think that the appellant cannot resort to proceedings by motion, but is relegated to his action. *(Lewis*v. Cockrell, 31 I11. App. 476.) The county treasurer is not an officer of this court. Indeed it appears from this record that the said respondents have begun an action to determine the rights of the respective parties to this money. I advise that the order of the Special Term be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander Salavanno, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 133

 141

 140

 144

 145

 146

 144

 154

 147

 126

 119

 124

 138

 133

 130

 129

 133

 135

 142

 147

 149

 158

 158

 162

 163

 170

 166

 166

 168

 172

 128

 132

 137

 139

 141

 111

 102

 95

 86

 84

 100

 104

 122

 128

 125

 124

 126

 130

 134

 140

 142

 145

 152

 157

 160

 162

 162

 164

 166

 167

 131

 135

 139

 141

 143

 132

 116

 112

 105

 99

 108

 112

 128

 130

 128

 126

 128

 132

 138

 142

 144

 148

 154

 159

 161

 163

 164

 165

 167

 169

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,000

 1,959

 1,930

 1,909

 1,890

 1,857

 1,822

 1,803

 1,781

 1,758

 1,743

 1,730

 1,730

 1,731

 1,728

 1,719

 1,708

 1,699

 1,694

 1,704

 1,732

 1,768

 1,817

 1,877

 1,930

 1,981

 2,017

 2,052

 2,091

 2,134

 143

 140

 138

 136

 135

 133

 130

 129

 127

 126

 125

 124

 124

 124

 123

 123

 122

 121

 121

 122

 124

 126

 130

 134

 138

 142

 144

 147

 149

 152

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
IZ '0 \**t~:** 

### 0 l 

### 2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.17

 360.71

 360.52

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.33

 360.33

 360.33

 360.33

 360.49

 360.49

 360.49

 360.52

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.24

 360.44

 360.52

 360.52

 360.49

 360.49

 549

 587

 573

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 560

 560

 560

 560

 571

 571

 571

 573

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 554

 568

 573

 573

 571

 571

STORAGE

-38

+38

-14

-19

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+6

+0

+0

+0

+11

+0

+0

+2

-19

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+14

+5

+0

-2

+0

CHANGE

 149

 127

 97

 96

 109

 140

 200

 233

 245

 280

 314

 349

 358

 358

 358

 336

 318

 318

 338

 356

 354

 353

 354

 376

 395

 389

 376

 390

 403

 403

 403

 1,420

 1,430

 1,220

 916

 570

 573

 577

 572

 578

 576

 576

 575

 656

 707

 702

 719

 867

 956

 948

 956

 747

 571

 575

 578

 577

 578

 699

 926

 992

 1,000

 1,000

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -16 0 24,337 9,275

ACRE-FEET -16 0 48,272 18,397

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 48,159

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 18,397

 114,828

 587

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 2,035

 1,991

 1,747

 1,446

 1,156

 1,215

 1,305

 1,373

 1,455

 1,536

 1,587

 1,626

 1,719

 1,917

 2,126

 2,116

 2,252

 2,334

 2,324

 2,367

 2,183

 2,081

 2,080

 2,068

 2,069

 2,061

 2,204

 2,493

 2,479

 2,421

 2,402

 60,168

 119,343

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 48,272

 464

 458

 465

 466

 478

 499

 514

 560

 619

 668

 685

 687

 689

 817

 892

 900

 904

 891

 888

 945

 980

 985

 975

 976

 1,000

 1,000

 1,020

 1,030

 980

 934

 911

 24,280

 48,159

RIVER CANALS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Ms. Jessica Fegan 

Connection Chemical LP 

126 South State Street, Suite 200 

Newtown, P A 18940 

JUN 2 3 2014 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Re: Connection Chemical LP's Conditional Exemption to a Test Rule Issued Under 

Section 4 ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act for CASRN 144-62-7 

Dear Ms. Fegan: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conditionally granting Connection 

Chemical LP's (CCLP) exemption application for the test requirements issued under section 4 of 

the Toxic Substances Control Act for ethanedioic acid (AKA oxalic acid dihydrate): (CASRN 

144-62-7) (Testing ofCertain High Production Volume Chemicals; Second Group ofChemicals, 

76 FR 1067, January 7, 2011). 

The EPA has determined that CCLP's exemption application dated May 28,2014, fulfills the 

requirements for a conditional exemption as described in 40 CFR part 790, subpart E. The EPA 

test rule regulations at 40 CFR 790, subpart E, allow the EPA to exempt companies from test 

rule requirements when another company is already conducting the required testing, as long as 

the exempt company applies for an exemption and includes a statement of fmancial 

responsibility at 40 CFR section 790.99. Exemptions are also conditioned on EPA receiving 

acceptable test data that is adequate to fulfill the test rule requirements. 

Testing for ethanedioic acid (CASRN 144-62-7) has been conducted by Univar USA Inc., and 

WEGO Chemical and Mineral Corporation. If for any reason, the EPA should terminate your 

conditional exemption, Connection Chemical LP will be notified by certified letter or by a 

Federal Register Notice. 

Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted wtth Vegetable Otl Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlorme Free Recycled Paper 
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. John Schaeffer by telephone at (202) 564·8173 or 

email at schaeffer.john@epa.gov. 

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

Paul Lewis, Ph.D. 

Chief, Chemical Information 

and Testing Branch
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 243

 242

 236

 239

 248

 255

 253

 250

 276

 267

 263

 259

 269

 259

 260

 246

 241

 237

 227

 220

 226

 209

 198

 200

 202

 201

 206

 213

 216

 217

 219

 204

 219

 217

 216

 216

 217

 214

 215

 212

 218

 202

 210

 211

 218

 212

 207

 202

 197

 189

 189

 190

 186

 192

 193

 183

 195

 195

 198

 202

 230

 227

 225

 225

 226

 228

 228

 228

 238

 240

 236

 237

 236

 230

 231

 224

 219

 213

 207

 200

 201

 197

 194

 195

 195

 196

 200

 202

 207

 211

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,107

 3,111

 3,120

 3,129

 3,140

 3,151

 3,158

 3,164

 3,177

 3,191

 3,201

 3,214

 3,227

 3,234

 3,235

 3,232

 3,226

 3,214

 3,195

 3,167

 3,140

 3,109

 3,065

 3,020

 2,979

 2,938

 2,902

 2,874

 2,850

 2,837

 222

 222

 223

 224

 224

 225

 226

 226

 227

 228

 229

 230

 231

 231

 231

 231

 230

 230

 228

 226

 224

 222

 219

 216

 213

 210

 207

 205

 204

 203

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
----

----

|                                                                                    |   |        |   |   |        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------|--------|--------|-------------|--------|
| THREE  MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,                                                 |   | 2010        |   |   | 2009        |   |
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)                                        |   | (Unaudited) |   |   | (Unaudited) |   |
|                                                                                    |   |        |   |   |        |   |
| BASIC EPS                                                                               |   |        |   |   |        |   |
| Net income (loss) as reported                                                           |   | $           | (8,805 | )      |        | $      | 12,494 |   |
| Income (loss) per Class A Share                                                         |   | $           | (0.16  | )      |        | $      | 0.22 |   |
|     Weighted average number of shares used in calculation (in thousands) |   |        | 56,134 |   |        |   | 56,153 |   |
|                                                                                    |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |   |
| DILUTED EPS                                                                             |   |        |   |   |        |   |   |   |
| Net income (loss) as reported                                                           |   | $           | (8,805 | )      |        | $      | 12,494 |   |
| Income (loss) per Class A Share                                                         |   | $           | (0.16  | )      |        | $      | 0.22 |   |
|     Weighted average number of shares used in calculation (in thousands) |   |        | 56,134 |   |        |   | 56,601 |   |

----

----
#### George W. Young v. United States Mortgage and Trust Company.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J.,- McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### subpart 3—white house conferences
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 451.76

 451.93

 452.03

 452.18

 452.46

 452.62

 452.82

 452.79

 452.61

 452.62

 452.55

 452.57

 452.44

 452.29

 452.00

 451.63

 451.18

 450.78

 450.41

 450.05

 449.67

 449.25

 448.82

 448.41

 448.04

 447.73

 447.32

 446.86

 446.43

 446.14

 823.7

 825.4

 826.4

 828.0

 830.9

 832.6

 834.7

 834.3

 832.5

 832.6

 831.9

 832.1

 830.7

 829.2

 826.1

 822.3

 817.7

 813.5

 809.7

 806.0

 802.2

 797.9

 793.5

 789.3

 785.6

 782.5

 778.3

 773.7

 769.4

 766.5

STORAGE

+1.4

+1.8

+1.0

+1.6

+2.9

+1.7

+2.1

-0.3

-1.9

+0.1

-0.7

+0.2

-1.4

-1.6

-3.0

-3.8

-4.6

-4.1

-3.8

-3.7

-3.9

-4.3

-4.4

-4.2

-3.8

-3.1

-4.1

-4.6

-4.3

-2.9

CHANGE

3,451

3,624

3,140

3,363

4,039

3,757

3,625

2,461

1,775

2,714

2,277

2,842

2,928

2,555

1,948

1,629

1,207

1,403

1,591

1,614

1,546

1,300

1,307

1,082

1,547

1,980

1,453

1,280

1,535

1,546

INFLOW

 2,232

 2,343

 2,203

 2,253

 2,226

 2,502

 2,157

 2,205

 2,328

 2,260

 2,219

 2,199

 3,110

 3,016

 3,034

 3,075

 3,094

 3,066

 3,085

 2,955

 3,120

 3,070

 3,085

 2,771

 2,980

 3,094

 3,034

 3,074

 3,257

 2,548

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 247

 244

 267

 269

 277

 290

 296

 282

 263

 288

 294

 298

 272

 266

 283

 282

 276

 281

 286

 289

 288

 286

 284

 289

 301

 299

 285

 283

 292

 303

PUMPING

 243

 151

 148

 55

 69

 127

 124

 131

 127

 114

 131

 241

 227

 58

 151

 199

 181

 133

 136

 234

 95

 105

 145

 118

 158

 164

 217

 256

 156

 159

C.F.S.

 .71

 .44

 .43

 .16

 .20

 .37

 .36

 .38

 .37

 .33

 .38

 .70

 .66

 .17

 .44

 .58

 .53

 .39

 .40

 .69

 .28

 .31

 .43

 .35

 .47

 .49

 .65

 .77

 .47

 .48

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 12, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -55.7 66,519 81,595 0 0 8,460 4,553 13.39 .00

ACRE-FEET -55,700 131,940 161,844 0 0 16,780 9,031

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 161,844

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 16,780

TOTAL 178,624

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 21.43

 822.2

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
### §40. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, §4(a)(15), 70 Stat. 947

Section, R.S. §2627; act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §523, 46 Stat. 740, related to duties of surveyor of customs. Section 5a of this title abolished the offices of surveyor of customs at all ports except New York.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thinh Tran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theAnnual Report of Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedJanuary 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.  

 

By:	 /s/ Thinh Tran					
Name:  Thinh Tran

Title:  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000.

§ 4.3 Forms prescribed. ( a ) The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to prescribe all forms required by this part. All of the information called for in each form shall be furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in each form shall be furnished as required by this part. The form will be filed in accordance with the instructions for the form.
( b ) Forms prescribed by this part are available for printing through the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.
[T.D. ATF-92, 46 FR 46911, Sept. 23, 1981, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5955, Feb. 27, 1987; T.D. 372, 61 FR 20723, May 8, 1996; T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11890, Mar. 7, 2000; T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16920, Apr. 4, 2006]
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5182 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from deploying strategic assets of 

the United States in the Republic of Turkey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Ms. SPEIER, and Mr. SOTO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Defense from deploying strategic assets of the United States in the Republic of 

Turkey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) As part of the North Atlantic Treaty Orga6 nization’s (NATO) nuclear sharing policy, non-nu7 clear NATO members have hosted United States nu8 clear weapons and associated forces within their re9 spective territories since the 1960s. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5182 IH

1 (2) NATO’s nuclear sharing policy was enacted 

2 during the Cold War as a means to enhance deter3 rence of the Soviet Union by involving non-nuclear 

4 NATO allies alongside the United States, the United 

5 Kingdom, and France. 

6 (3) Turkey has been a member of NATO since 

7 the organization’s first enlargement in 1952. 

8 (4) Turkey’s current president Recep Tayyip 

9 Erdogan has altered many long-standing Turkish 

10 policies and institutions, making the Government of 

11 Turkey more authoritarian and Islamist. 

12 (5) The failed coup attempt of July 2016 and 

13 the subsequent reprisals against suspected partici14 pants raise concerns about the stability of the Turk15 ish government and the discipline of its military. 

16 (6) Turkey continues to develop stronger rela17 tions with geopolitical adversaries to NATO such as 

18 Russia, China, and Iran. 

19 (7) In October 2019, in response to questions 

20 about the security of United States strategic assets 

21 in Turkey, the President of the United States noted 

22 ‘‘we’re confident, and we have a great—a great air 

23 base there, a very powerful air base.’’. 

24 (8) The Incirlik Air Base website states, ‘‘The 

25 39 Operations Support Squadron leads world-class 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5182 IH

1 airfield & support operations to orchestrate and con2 trol U.S., Turkish, and coalition forces operating at 

3 Incirlik Airbase in the execution of full-spectrum air4 power and nuclear deterrent operations.’’. 

5 (9) Turkey denied the United States access to 

6 Incirlik Air Base during the Iraq War in 2003 and 

7 refused to allow coalition jets to use Incirlik when 

8 ISIS gained ground in Kobani, Syria, in 2014. 

9 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

10 CERTAIN DEPLOYMENT OF STRATEGIC AS11 SETS. 

12 None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 

13 otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 or any fiscal 

14 year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be ob15 ligated or expended for the future deployment of any stra16 tegic assets of the United States in the Republic of Tur17 key. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Notices 2953 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

[OMB Control No. 2900–0068] 

Agency Information Collection 

(Application for Service-Disabled 

Veterans Insurance) Activity Under 

OMB Review 

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice 

announces that the Veterans Benefits 

Administration (VBA), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, will submit the 

collection of information abstracted 

below to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and comment. 

The PRA submission describes the 

nature of the information collection and 

its expected cost and burden; it includes 

the actual data collection instrument. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before February 17, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

on the collection of information through 

http://www.Regulations.gov; or to VA’s 

OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395–7316. 

Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900– 

0068’’ in any correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 

Service (005R1B), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461– 

7485, fax (202) 273–0966 or e-mail 

denise.mclamb@va.gov. Please refer to 

‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–0068.’’ 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Application for ServiceDisabled Veterans Insurance, VA Forms 

29–4364 and 29–0151. 

OMB Control Number: 2900–0068. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: Claimants complete VA 

Forms 29–4364 and 29–0151 to apply 

for service-disabled veterans insurance, 

designate a beneficiary and to select an 

optional settlement. VA uses the data 

collected to determine the claimant’s 

eligibility for insurance. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The Federal Register 

Notice with a 60-day comment period 

soliciting comments on this collection 

of information was published on 

November 4, 2010, at pages 68036– 

68037. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 8,333 

hours. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Respondent: 20 minutes. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

25,000. 

Dated: January 11, 2011. 

By direction of the Secretary. 

Denise McLamb, 

Program Analyst, Enterprise Records Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–834 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES