Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Notices 19747 

1Antidumping Duty Order; Urea From the Union 

of Soviet Socialist Republics, 52 FR 26367 (July 14, 

1987); Solid Urea From the Union of Soviet 

Socialist Republics; Transfer of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Solid Urea From the Union of Soviet 

Socialist Republics to the Commonwealth of 

Independent States and the Baltic States and 

Opportunity to Comment, 57 FR 28828 (June 29, 

1992). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1750] 

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; 

Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing 

Corporation (Multi-Stage Centrifugal 

Pumps); Allentown, PA 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act 

provides for ‘‘* * * the establishment 

* * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 

entry of the United States, to expedite 

and encourage foreign commerce, and 

for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to 

qualified corporations the privilege of 

establishing foreign-trade zones in or 

adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection ports of entry; 

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 

CFR part 400) provide for the 

establishment of special-purpose 

subzones when existing zone facilities 

cannot serve the specific use involved, 

and when the activity results in a 

significant public benefit and is in the 

public interest; 

Whereas, the Lehigh Valley Economic 

Development Corporation, grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 272, has made 

application to the Board for authority to 

establish a special-purpose subzone at 

the multi-stage centrifugal pump 

manufacturing facility of Grundfos 

Pumps Manufacturing Corporation, 

located in Allentown, Pennsylvania 

(FTZ Docket 21–2010, filed 3–24–2010); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment has been given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 15679, 3–30–2010) and 

the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

grants authority for subzone status for 

activity related to the manufacturing of 

multi-stage centrifugal pumps at the 

Grundfos Pumps Manufacturing 

Corporation facility located in 

Allentown, Pennsylvania (Subzone 

272A), as described in the application 

and Federal Register notice, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of 

March 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8449 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3610–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–801, A–823–801] 

Solid Urea From the Russian 

Federation and Ukraine: Final Results 

of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated the third sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on solid urea from the Russian 

Federation (Russia) and Ukraine, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review, 75 FR 74685 (December 1, 2010) 

(Notice of Initiation). The Department 

has conducted expedited (120-day) 

sunset reviews of these orders. As a 

result of these sunset reviews, the 

Department finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping as indicated in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Dustin Ross 

or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0747 or (202) 482–1690, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2010, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

sunset reviews of the antidumping duty 

orders 1 on solid urea from Russia and 

Ukraine pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Act. See Notice of Initiation. 

The Department received notices of 

intent to participate in these sunset 

reviews from the domestic interested 

parties, the urea-producing members of 

the Ad Hoc Committee of Domestic 

Nitrogen Producers, CF Industries, Inc., 

and PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., within 

the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic 

interested parties claimed interestedparty status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as manufacturers of a domestic 

like product for each proceeding. 

The Department received complete 

substantive responses to the Notice of 

Initiation from the domestic interested 

parties within the 30-day period 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 

The Department received no substantive 

responses from any respondent 

interested parties. In accordance with 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 

Department is conducting expedited 

(120-day) sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on solid urea 

from Russia and Ukraine. 

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise subject to the orders 

is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content 

fertilizer which is produced by reacting 

ammonia with carbon dioxide. The 

product is currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item number 

3102.10.00.00. Previously such 

merchandise was classified under item 

number 480.3000 of the Tariff 

Schedules of the United States. 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to the orders is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset 

Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders on Solid Urea From the Russian 

Federation and Ukraine’’ from Gary 

Taverman to Ronald K. Lorentzen dated 

concurrently with this notice (Issues 

and Decision Memo), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The issues 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memo include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the margin likely 

to prevail if the orders were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
19748 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Notices 

of all issues raised in these reviews and 

the corresponding recommendations in 

this public memorandum which is on 

file in the Central Records Unit, room 

7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memo can be 

accessed directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on solid urea from Russia and 

Ukraine would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted-average 

percentage margins: 

Company 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Soyuzpromexport .................. (SPE) 68.26 

Phillipp Brothers, Ltd., and 

Phillipp Brothers, Inc. 

(Phibro) ............................. 53.23 

All Others .............................. 64.93 

Notification Regarding APO 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing the final results and notice 

in accordance with sections 751(c), 

752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 31, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8446 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XA312 

Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative 

Management Act Provisions; General 

Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; 

Application for Exempted Fishing 

Permits 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional 

Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, 

Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant 

Regional Administrator), has made a 

preliminary determination that an 

Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) 

application contains all of the required 

information and warrants further 

consideration. This EFP application 

would exempt commercial fishing 

vessels from the following Federal 

American lobster regulations: (1) Gear 

specifications (including escape vents, 

ghost panel and maximum trap size; (2) 

trap limits; and (3) trap tags to allow 11 

Federally permitted vessels to utilize a 

combined total of 35 modified lobster 

traps to catch juvenile lobsters, (30–50 

mm carapace length), throughout lobster 

management area 3 (Area 3), in an 

attempt to understand patterns of larval 

dispersal and settlement. This proposed 

project would be conducted by the 

Atlantic Offshore Lobster Association 

(AOLA) in conjunction with scientists 

and the fishing industry. 

Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act require publication of 

this notification to provide interested 

parties the opportunity to comment on 

applications for proposed EFPs. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 25, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice 

may be submitted by e-mail. The 

mailbox address for providing e-mail 

comments is NERO.EFP@noaa.gov. 

Include in the subject line ‘‘Comments 

on AOLA Lobster EFP.’’ Written 

comments should be sent to Patricia A. 

Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, 

NE Regional Office, 55 Great Republic 

Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the 

outside of the envelope ‘‘Comments on 

AOLA Lobster EFP.’’ 

• Fax: (978) 281–9135. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carol She ́, Fishery Policy Analyst, 978– 

282–8464, Carol.She@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AOLA 

submitted a complete application for an 

EFP on March 11, 2011, to conduct 

commercial fishing activities that the 

regulations would otherwise restrict. 

This EFP application would exempt 

commercial fishing vessels from the 

following Federal regulations: gear 

specifications (including escape vents, 

ghost panel and maximum trap size) 

specified under 50 CFR 697.21(c)(4), 

697.21(d) and 697.21(e)(2)(ii); trap 

limits specified under § 697.19(b)(5); 

and trap tags specified under § 697.19(f). 

The EFP would authorize 11 Federally 

permitted vessels to be exempted from 

parts of the Federal lobster regulations 

to allow the participating vessels to fish 

modified lobster traps, exceed trap 

limits, and deploy the modified traps 

without trap tags in an attempt to 

formalize the anecdotal presence of 

young lobsters. Some lobster scientists 

believe that larvae will only survive in 

the inshore fishery due to the depths 

and available light, and that there are no 

small lobsters offshore; however, data 

resulting from this project are intended 

to determine whether there are new 

lobster nursery grounds offshore. 

This project, including the lobster 

handling protocols, was initially 

developed in consultation with 

University of New Hampshire scientists. 

To the greatest extent practicable, these 

handling protocols are designed to 

avoid unnecessary adverse 

environmental impact on lobsters 

involved in this project, while achieving 

the data collection objectives of this 

project. AOLA will work in conjunction 

with scientists and the fishing industry 

to build and test various trap 

modifications to determine the optimal 

design for use in offshore waters. The 

modified gear may exceed the Federal 

maximum trap size restrictions, include 

smaller wire mesh sizes, modified 

entrance heads/rings, closed or 

modified escape vents, and cobble 

acting as shelter material. The 

deployment of the experimental traps 

throughout lobster management area 3 

(Area 3) statistical areas 464, 522, 561, 

562, 525, 526, 533, 537, 613, 616, and 

622, would begin in April 2011 and 

extend through August 2012. AOLA 

would submit progress reports in 

December 2011 and September 2012, 

since the project would exceed 1 year. 

Participating vessels would include 

between one and three experimental 

lobster traps as part of a commercial 

lobster trap trawl deployed under 

routine industry conditions. Modified 

traps would remain in the water for up 

to 6 consecutive months (182 days), 

being hauled approximately weekly 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES