alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harriet G. Rothbard, Appellant, v. Benton Rothbard, Respondent.

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for counsel fees for services to he rendered in. connection with an appeal herein, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11003 

Summary Calendar

__________________

HENRY HARGROVE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:94-CV-111-X

- - - - - - - - - -

May 20, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Henry Hargrove appeals the district court's determination

that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Secretary's decision

not to reopen his 1989 claim for disability benefits. We have

reviewed the record and Hargrove's brief and AFFIRM the district

court's dismissal for the same reasons set forth by the district

court. Hargrove v. Shalala, 7:94-CV-111-X (N.D. Tex.; Sept. 7,

1995). Insofar as Hargrove argues that the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 405(b)(3)(A), mandates a hearing prior to a decision 
No. 95-11003

-2-

to reopen, thus distinguishing his case from the holding of

Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977), we do not consider this

argument as it is raised for the first time in Hargrove's reply

brief. See Stephens v. C.I.T. Group/Equip. Fin., Inc., 955 F.2d

1023, 1026 (5th Cir. 1992). 

 AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 360.52

 360.51

 360.51

 360.51

 360.51

 360.52

 360.49

 360.51

 360.52

 360.51

 360.20

 360.20

 360.21

 360.23

 360.23

 360.23

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 360.17

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 571

 573

 573

 573

 551

 551

 552

 553

 553

 553

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

 549

STORAGE

+17

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

-22

+0

+1

+1

+0

+0

-4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,477

 1,507

 1,504

 1,502

 1,505

 1,505

 1,503

 1,505

 1,508

 1,501

 1,190

 901

 901

 903

 902

 901

 833

 802

 805

 803

 804

 808

 805

 521

 803

 803

 805

 804

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -7 0 30,111 0

ACRE-FEET -7 0 59,725 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 2,126

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 61,851

 556

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,462

 1,484

 1,480

 1,483

 1,483

 1,484

 1,470

 1,534

 1,538

 1,511

 1,279

 1,095

 1,097

 1,098

 1,025

 975

 881

 816

 800

 799

 799

 796

 796

 521

 803

 802

 802

 801

 30,914

 61,318

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 59,725

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 115

 209

 210

 210

 144

 95

 67

 22

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,072

 2,126

RIVER CANALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 317

 309

 309

 309

 308

 303

 298

 294

 292

 296

 299

 298

 282

 281

 272

 269

 262

 260

 256

 253

 250

 247

 244

 244

 241

 242

 242

 237

 232

 232

 231

 277

 275

 269

 270

 261

 245

 248

 253

 258

 259

 258

 258

 254

 236

 240

 237

 236

 237

 233

 233

 231

 227

 221

 223

 217

 223

 221

 223

 201

 216

 213

 299

 295

 293

 290

 285

 272

 269

 272

 274

 277

 278

 276

 269

 265

 259

 254

 250

 250

 246

 244

 242

 237

 233

 231

 228

 231

 231

 229

 225

 224

 221

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
NO. 07-03-0079-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	MAY 29, 2003

	______________________________

	JAMES WARREN BRIGHT, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 16,336; HONORABLE CECIL PURYEAR, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	In this proceeding, appellant James Warren Bright is attempting to appeal the refusal of the trial court to appoint an attorney to represent him in his application for forensic DNA testing as provided in Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

	We have nothing in the record before us other than appellant’s application for extension of time within which to file an appellate brief and a clerk’s record.  We have requested a response from the State and have received a reply stating that it is not opposed to appellant receiving a clerk’s record as an indigent.

	This state of the record requires us to abate the appeal and remand the proceedings to the trial court to determine: 

	1.  Whether appellant is indigent and is entitled to the furnishing of a clerk’s record showing what previous hearings took place in the trial court, as well as the appointment of an attorney as provided in Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

	 2. If testimony was taken at the hearing giving rise to appellant’s appeal, whether appellant is indigent and is entitled to the preparation of a reporter’s record. 

	3.  If other orders are necessary to ensure the diligent and prompt pursuit of appellant’s appeal, and if so, to enter any such orders.

	In support of its determination, the trial court shall prepare and file conclusions of law and, if appropriate, findings of fact and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.  If testimony is taken, it shall be transcribed and included in a reporter’s record.  Those supplemental records shall be submitted to this court not later than June 30, 2003.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
### §3724. Assistant United States Trade Representative for African Affairs

It is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) the position of Assistant United States Trade Representative for African Affairs is integral to the United States commitment to increasing United States-sub-Saharan African trade and investment;

(2) the position of Assistant United States Trade Representative for African Affairs should be maintained within the Office of the United States Trade Representative to direct and coordinate interagency activities on United States-Africa trade policy and investment matters and serve as—

(A) a primary point of contact in the executive branch for those persons engaged in trade between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa; and

(B) the chief advisor to the United States Trade Representative on issues of trade and investment with Africa; and

(3) the United States Trade Representative should have adequate funding and staff to carry out the duties of the Assistant United States Trade Representative for African Affairs described in paragraph (2), subject to the availability of appropriations.

(Pub. L. 106–200, title I, §117, May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 267.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13395-13396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04562]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT)

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 19-21, 2013, from 9:00 a.m.--5:00 
p.m. daily.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Booze, Allen, Hamilton Offices, 
1201 Maryland Avenue SW., Suite 5140, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 223. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday, March 19 Through Thursday, March 21, 2013

     Plenary: Welcome, Introductions, Administrative Remarks.
     Agenda Overview.
     Review and Approve prior Plenary Meeting Summary.
     Profile CCB Status.
     Detailed MOPS Review:
     Convergence Sub-layer.
     Security.
     MAC Layer.
     Physical Layer.
     PICS.
     CRSL.
     Review/Approval of MOPS for FRAC.
     Review of Meeting Summary Report.

[[Page 13396]]

     Finalize date of next meeting:
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 21, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-04562 Filed 2-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 990

 960

 894

 924

 942

 909

 905

 883

 848

 841

 835

 814

 832

 828

 801

 800

 827

 843

 867

 924

 939

 962

 967

 976

 991

 1,034

 1,058

 1,088

 1,117

 1,129

 1,086

 651

 587

 618

 664

 571

 648

 526

 634

 620

 564

 561

 602

 655

 635

 545

 557

 615

 621

 609

 630

 646

 684

 681

 684

 682

 706

 718

 753

 758

 738

 734

 816

 788

 778

 797

 810

 804

 793

 796

 774

 771

 760

 757

 755

 719

 691

 689

 721

 745

 763

 804

 829

 844

 844

 837

 847

 865

 886

 911

 920

 937

 940

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Exhibit 10.18
 Amendment
To  Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.By:
    /s/ Matthew MiddendorfMatthew MiddendorfTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer EXECUTIVE/s/ Marvin R. RichardsonMarvin R. Richardson
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00182- CV
John J. Rogers, Jr.; Jam es R. Winton and Burl Richardson , Appellan ts
v. Texas Board of

Arc hitectural Exam iners, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 8-0 0463 4, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA-DO Y AL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties’ thi rd j oint motion to abate this cause is GRANT E D, an d the appeal i s AB ATED until J une 8, 2012. The parties shall submit either a motion to reinstate or a joint status repor

t conce rning the status of s et t l em en t n egotiations no later than J une 8, 2012. Upon reinstateme nt , m o t i o n s for rehe aring will be due no later than the tenth (10th) date followingreinstateme nt.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Abated Filed: F ebrua

ry 17, 2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 169

 181

 186

 214

 264

 338

 449

 559

 528

 594

 724

 770

 713

 594

 496

 528

 530

 631

 636

 712

 806

 818

 824

 802

 760

 753

 686

 639

 592

 561

 571

 148

 143

 149

 152

 154

 159

 161

 170

 179

 203

 221

 229

 238

 246

 244

 250

 260

 266

 268

 277

 294

 289

 295

 286

 306

 313

 310

 313

 309

 323

 309

 156

 157

 159

 164

 182

 216

 248

 279

 294

 330

 371

 397

 376

 353

 328

 340

 346

 355

 372

 421

 467

 459

 470

 465

 474

 477

 455

 421

 407

 406

 397

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,187

 2,188

 2,192

 2,204

 2,233

 2,295

 2,387

 2,509

 2,647

 2,820

 3,033

 3,273

 3,487

 3,682

 3,854

 4,037

 4,224

 4,415

 4,605

 4,810

 5,029

 5,209

 5,385

 5,520

 5,623

 5,703

 5,782

 5,850

 5,929

 5,995

 6,046

 156

 156

 157

 157

 160

 164

 171

 179

 189

 201

 217

 234

 249

 263

 275

 288

 302

 315

 329

 344

 359

 372

 385

 394

 402

 407

 413

 418

 424

 428

 432

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6705

ALONZO S. SESSOMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. K. YOUNG, Warden; T. JOHNSON, Head Nurse; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-302-7) Submitted: September 14, 2000 Decided: October 5, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alonzo S. Sessoms, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Alonzo S. Sessoms appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. A dismissal without prejudice is not reviewable by the court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In the present case, the district court properly found that Sessoms failed to allege all of the elements necessary to support his claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. Because Sessoms can cure these defects by amending his complaint, we dismiss this appeal. We deny Sessoms’ motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for a jury trial.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 583.66

 585.07

 585.05

 584.17

 583.93

 585.27

 584.37

 585.30

 585.09

 584.52

 584.87

 584.72

 583.31

 582.95

 582.53

 582.89

 584.48

 584.88

 582.88

 583.45

 583.42

 583.07

 583.00

 579.55

 583.14

 583.93

 585.48

 585.06

 585.12

 583.29

 21,684

 22,551

 22,538

 21,995

 21,848

 22,677

 22,118

 22,695

 22,564

 22,211

 22,427

 22,334

 21,471

 21,253

 21,002

 21,217

 22,186

 22,433

 21,211

 21,556

 21,538

 21,325

 21,283

 19,271

 21,368

 21,848

 22,808

 22,545

 22,582

 21,459

STORAGE

+292

+867

-13

-543

-147

+829

-559

+577

-131

-353

+216

-93

-863

-218

-251

+215

+969

+247

-1,222

+345

-18

-213

-42

-2,012

+2,097

+480

+960

-263

+37

-1,123

CHANGE

13,993

14,218

14,092

13,698

13,926

13,688

13,936

14,335

14,412

14,039

14,330

14,293

13,917

14,256

14,237

13,961

14,833

14,651

13,828

14,294

14,639

14,577

14,717

13,567

15,304

15,183

14,199

13,413

13,583

13,039

INFLOW

 13,758

 13,694

 14,011

 13,883

 13,909

 13,179

 14,127

 13,951

 14,387

 14,125

 14,130

 14,250

 14,263

 14,279

 14,278

 13,763

 14,252

 14,434

 14,352

 14,029

 14,556

 14,593

 14,646

 14,487

 14,155

 14,849

 13,623

 13,456

 13,476

 13,514

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 3

 2

 3

 4

 6

 6

 6

 8

 6

 7

 6

 5

 4

 2

 1

 5

 7

 7

 7

 6

 7

 6

 7

 9

 7

 7

 7

 5

 3

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2006 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 15, 2006

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +67 425,158 422,409 0 2,550 165

ACRE-FEET +67 843,301 837,848 0 5,058 327

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 837,848

SPILL 0

 21,392

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 3,370

 3,618

 3,523

 4,082

 3,607

 4,032

 3,724

 3,350

 3,991

 3,445

 3,549

 4,074

 3,450

 3,792

 2,906

 4,111

 3,220

 3,405

 1,939

 1,954

 1,957

 1,621

 1,544

 1,952

 1,592

 1,922

 2,009

 1,846

 1,913

 1,841

 87,339

 173,237

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 10,220

 10,328

 10,231

 9,628

 10,078

 9,710

 9,822

 10,627

 10,016

 10,297

 10,233

 9,645

 9,729

 9,953

 10,988

 9,223

 10,779

 10,585

 11,294

 11,508

 12,130

 12,194

 12,672

 11,297

 13,437

 12,741

 11,629

 11,141

 11,303

 10,862

 324,300

 643,249

Table 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0014

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.T.H.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until November 2, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. 

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 21 2023

09/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0014
#### Miles J. Lourie, an Infant, by Felix C. Lourie, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Moses Swick et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,176.62

 1,177.13

 1,177.63

 1,178.20

 1,178.77

 1,179.32

 1,179.85

 1,180.35

 1,180.80

 1,181.24

 1,181.66

 1,182.06

 1,182.44

 1,182.80

 1,183.14

 1,183.46

 1,183.76

 1,184.04

 1,184.30

 1,184.54

 1,184.81

 1,185.07

 1,185.34

 1,185.61

 1,185.87

 1,186.12

 1,186.37

 1,186.60

 1,186.83

 1,187.04

 1,187.25

 18.88

 19.38

 19.88

 20.46

 21.05

 21.63

 22.21

 22.75

 23.25

 23.75

 24.23

 24.69

 25.14

 25.56

 25.97

 26.36

 26.72

 27.07

 27.39

 27.69

 28.03

 28.35

 28.70

 29.05

 29.38

 29.71

 30.04

 30.34

 30.65

 30.93

 31.21

STORAGE

+0.52

+0.50

+0.50

+0.58

+0.59

+0.58

+0.57

+0.55

+0.50

+0.50

+0.48

+0.46

+0.45

+0.43

+0.41

+0.39

+0.37

+0.34

+0.32

+0.30

+0.34

+0.33

+0.34

+0.35

+0.34

+0.33

+0.33

+0.30

+0.31

+0.28

+0.28

CHANGE

263

254

253

295

300

294

289

278

253

251

244

235

226

217

209

197

186

175

163

154

173

174

180

178

172

170

168

157

158

145

145

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 1

 1

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 1

 2

 1

 3

 2

 9

 7

 3

 2

 5

 2

 4

 3

 3

 2

C.F.S.

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .10

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .07

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .11

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .06

 .21

 .16

 .06

 .05

 .11

 .05

 .09

 .07

 .06

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/23/2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +12.87 6,556 0 0 77 1.92 .00

ACRE-FEET +12,870 13,004 0 0 153

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2021 5.94

 18.36

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 5.56