alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 21468.

#### Anthony E. Reilly *v.*Bertha Sellers, Defendant in Error, and Joseph M. Brennan, Intervener in Error.

(398 P.2d 433)

Decided January 25, 1965.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Intervener in error, pro se.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

*291On January 3, 1961, Anthony Reilly brought suit against Bertha Sellers, contending that, in truth and in fact, he was the owner of certain shares of stock which Sellers had sold to a third party. Reilly requested judgment against Sellers for any monies received by her for the said stock; and sought to have a promissory note and contract, representing the balance of the sale price, impressed with a trust and deemed and decreed to be held in trust for his use and benefit.

Mrs. Sellers filed an answer denying the allegations of the complaint, and sought, by way of counterclaim, to obtain judgment against Reilly for monies she alleged were due her from him. Thereafter, and on October 26, 1961, one Joseph Brennan filed a petition to intervene, contending that he owned the stock in question and was entitled to the purchase price. After a hearing, the petition to intervene was denied on December 1, 1961.

Almost three years later, Reilly and Sellers settled their differences and on August 6, 1964, they filed a stipulation that the action be dismissed with prejudice. Judgment of dismissal was entered by the trial court on the same day.

Brennan thereupon sued out writ of error here, designating Reilly as plaintiff in error, Sellers as defendant in error and himself as intervener in error. In reality, the designation of parties is a misnomer as Brennan is in truth the plaintiff in error desiring review of the trial court’s refusal to permit him to intervene, although he. puts the matter rather obscurely.

The lawsuit in which Brennan sought to intervene in the lower court was terminated when the judgment of dismissal, upon stipulation, was entered by that court. It is apparent from the face of the petition to intervene that Brennan’s rights, if any he had, were affected in no way, nor were they adjudicated by the judgment of dismissal entered in the trial court. Under such circumstances, he has no standing here. *Sutphen Estates, Inc.,*
      *292
      *v. United States of America, Loew’s Incorporated, Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., et al.,*342 U.S. 19, 72 S.Ct. 14, 96 L.EcL 19; *Brotherhood of R. Trainmen v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.,*331 U.S. 519, 524, 67 S.Ct. 1387, 91 L.Ed. 1646, 1649. The matter stands, as far as Brennan is concerned, as if the original suit by Reilly against Sellers had never been filed in the district court.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.30 Export status. ( a ) Distilled spirits and wines manufactured, produced, bottled in bottles packed in containers, or packaged in casks or other bulk containers in the United States, and beer brewed or produced in the United States may be transferred to a foreign-trade zone for the sole purpose of exportation, or storage pending exportation. Liquors deposited in a foreign-trade zone under this part solely for such purposes are considered to be exported. Export status is not acquired until application on Form 214 for admission of the liquors into the zone has been approved by the district director of customs under the appropriate provision of 19 CFR chapter I, and the required certification of deposit has been made on the TTB form prescribed in this part.
( b ) The provisions of subpart H of this part do not apply to specially denatured spirits transferred to a foreign-trade zone for use in the manufacture of articles pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 81c(c). Transfer of domestic specially denatured spirits to a qualified user in a foreign-trade zone is made free of tax under the provisions of part 20 of this chapter. Such transfer does not place the domestic specially denatured spirits in an export status.
(48 Stat. 999, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c))
[T.D. ATF-274, 53 FR 25157, July 5, 1988, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3831, Jan. 27, 2004]
#### Southern New England Telephone Company *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al.

*Elliot Taubmcm,*in support of the petition.

Submitted January 22

decided January 26, 1971

The petition by Elliot Taubman on behalf of Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc., for leave to file a brief and to argue before this court as amicus curiae in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
Exhibit 10.9
 CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC.  AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION,  INVENTION ASSIGNMENT, AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
 Company Agreement
 1. At-Will Employment
  2. Confidentiality
 Definition of Confidential Information Company Confidential
Information




---



##### 



Nonuse and Nondisclosure Section 2.B
 Former Employer Confidential Information
 Third Party Information Associated Third Parties Associated Third Party Confidential Information
 Page 2 of 15




---



##### 



3. Ownership
 Assignment of Inventions Section 3.G Inventions
 Pre-Existing Materials Exhibit A Prior Inventions
 Page 3 of 15




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 Moral Rights Moral Rights
 Maintenance of Records
 Further Assurances Section 3.E
 Attorney-in-Fact Section 3.A
 Page 4 of 15




---



##### 



Exception to Assignments EXHIBIT A
 4. Conflicting Obligations
 Current Obligations.
 Prior Relationships Section 4.A
 5. Return of Company Materials
 Page 5 of 15




---



##### 



Section 3.D Article 5
 6. Termination Certification
 Exhibit B
 7. Notification of New Employer
  8. Solicitation of Employees
 Article 8 Article 2
 9. Conflict of Interest Guidelines
 Exhibit C
 Page 6 of 15




---



##### 



10. Representations
 Section 3.E
 11. Audit
   12. Arbitration and Equitable Relief
 Page 7 of 15




---



##### 



Arbitration ACT DISPUTES THAT I AGREE TO ARBITRATE, AND THEREBY AGREE TO
WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY, INCLUDE ANY STATUTORY CLAIMS UNDER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL
LAW, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CLAIMS UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964, THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, THE AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1967, THE
OLDER WORKERS BENEFIT PROTECTION ACT, THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT, THE WORKER ADJUSTMENT AND RETRAINING
NOTIFICATION ACT, THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, THE COLORADO LABOR CODE, CLAIMS OF HARASSMENT,
DISCRIMINATION, AND WRONGFUL TERMINATION, AND ANY STATUTORY OR COMMON LAW CLAIMS.
 Procedure JAMS JAMS RULES
 Page 8 of 15




---



##### 



Remedy
 Administrative Relief
 Voluntary Nature of Agreement I AM WAIVING MY RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL
 Page 9 of 15




---



##### 



13. Miscellaneous
 Governing Law; Consent to Personal Jurisdiction
 Assignability
 Entire Agreement
 Headings
 Severability
 Modification, Waiver.
 Page 10 of 15




---



##### 



Survivorship.
 Date:  5/12/09
    
    /s/ Erle T. MastSignatureErle T. MastName of Employee (typed or printed)  Signature Name (typed or printed) Page 11 of 15




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 LIST OF PRIOR INVENTIONS
AND ORIGINAL WORKS OF AUTHORSHIP
 Title
    
    Date
    
    Identifying Number or Brief Description
 þ
 o
 Date:  5/12/09
    
    /s/ Erle T. MastSignatureErle T. MastName of Employee (typed or printed) Page 12 of 15




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC. TERMINATION CERTIFICATION
 Company
   Article 2
  Date: ________________SignatureName of Employee (typed or printed)Address for Notifications:  Page 13 of 15




---



##### 



EXHIBIT C
 CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC. CONFLICT OF INTEREST GUIDELINES
             Page 14 of 15




---



##### 



Page 15 of 15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,457.90

 3,457.84

 3,457.83

 3,457.78

 3,457.77

 3,457.71

 3,457.71

 3,457.71

 3,457.65

 3,457.65

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.71

 3,457.71

 3,457.71

 3,457.71

 3,457.65

 3,457.65

 3,457.65

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.59

 3,457.53

 3,457.53

 3,457.53

 3,457.47

 3,457.40

 3,457.47

 33,028

 32,993

 32,988

 32,959

 32,953

 32,919

 32,919

 32,919

 32,884

 32,884

 32,850

 32,850

 32,850

 32,850

 32,919

 32,919

 32,919

 32,919

 32,884

 32,884

 32,884

 32,850

 32,850

 32,850

 32,850

 32,816

 32,816

 32,816

 32,781

 32,741

 32,781

STORAGE

-5

-35

-5

-29

-6

-34

+0

+0

-35

+0

-34

+0

+0

+0

+69

+0

+0

+0

-35

+0

+0

-34

+0

+0

+0

-34

+0

+0

-35

-40

+40

CHANGE

14.5

0.6

16.8

6.5

16.1

1.1

19.2

19.2

0.4

19.4

1.2

20.0

19.0

18.3

53.7

17.0

17.2

19.2

2.6

18.3

19.2

-3.1

14.0

14.0

14.0

-2.1

14.6

15.3

-4.1

-5.2

35.2

INFLOW

 16

 17

 18

 20

 18

 17

 18

 18

 17

 18

 17

 19

 18

 17

 16

 16

 16

 18

 19

 17

 18

 13

 13

 13

 13

 14

 13

 14

 12

 14

 14

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 0.0

 0.2

 0.3

 0.1

 0.1

 0.2

 0.2

 0.2

 0.0

 0.4

 0.3

 0.0

 0.0

 0.3

 1.9

 0.0

 0.2

 0.2

 0.2

 0.3

 0.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.6

 0.3

 0.5

 0.0

 0.0

C.F.S.

 .000

 .012

 .018

 .005

 .003

 .010

 .010

 .010

 .000

 .020

 .018

 .000

 .000

 .017

 .100

 .000

 .010

 .010

 .010

 .018

 .010

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .030

 .015

 .026

 .000

 .000

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .84

 .00

 .96

 .73

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/19/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -252 412.1 501 31.0 0.0 6.7 .352 2.56

ACRE-FEET -252 817.4 994 61.5 0.0 13.3

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 993.7

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 523.6

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 12.94

 33,033

 470.1 2.56

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 6

 5

 11

 16

 15

 7

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 174

 345

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 1, 2012 

p0125 

Order 

 

February 1, 2012 

143618 

LINDA LOIS SMITH, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143618 

 COA: 295243 

Grd Traverse CC: 09-027049-DO 

STANLEY ALLAN SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
§ 645.10 What kinds of projects are supported under the Upward Bound Program? The Secretary provides grants to the following three types of Upward Bound projects: ( a ) Regular Upward Bound projects designed to prepare high school students for programs of postsecondary education.
( b ) Upward Bound Math and Science Centers designed to prepare high school students for postsecondary education programs that lead to careers in the fields of math and science.
( c ) Veterans Upward Bound projects designed to assist veterans to prepare for a program of postsecondary education.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-13)
### **CHAPTER 11—NATIONAL ARBORETUM**

Sec.
191.
Establishment; site; acquisition of land.
192.
Omitted.
193.
Administration of arboretum.
194.
Advisory council.
195.
Gifts, bequests, or devises for benefit of National Arboretum; separate fund in the Treasury.
196.
Concessions, fees, and voluntary services.
197.
Construction of Chinese Garden at the National Arboretum.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Chris L. Koliopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 17, 2010

/s/ Chris L. Koliopoulos  Chris L. KoliopoulosPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofZygo Corporation
#### § 24.141 Bonded wine warehouse.

Where all operations at a bonded wine warehouse are to be permanently discontinued, the warehouse proprietor shall file with the appropriate TTB officer a notice in letter form to cover the discontinuance. The warehouse proprietor shall state in the notice the name, registry number, and address of the wine premises on which the warehouse facilities are located and the date on which operations of the bonded wine warehouse will be discontinued.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5353))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0292)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
#### Bonded Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. Carodix Corporation et al., Defendants, Joseph P. Day et al., as Trustees, Defendants-Respondents, and County of Nassau, Impleaded Defendant, Appellant.

*738Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5378 

To extend the death gratuity and casualty assistance to survivors of certain 

deceased graduates of the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2019 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself, Mr. HOYER, and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To extend the death gratuity and casualty assistance to 

survivors of certain deceased graduates of the Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Lieutenant 

5 Richard W. Collins III Memorial Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEATH GRATUITY FOR ROTC GRADUATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1475(a)(4) of title 10, 

8 United States Code, is amended by adding ‘‘; or a grad9 uate of a reserve officers’ training corps who received a 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5378 IH

1 commission but has yet to receive a first duty assignment; 

2 or’’ at the end. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment under sub4 section (a) applies to deaths on or after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act. 

6 SEC. 3. CASUALTY ASSISTANCE FOR ROTC GRADUATES. 

7 Section 633 of the National Defense Authorization 

8 Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (10 U.S.C. 1475 note) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(c) ROTC GRADUATES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) TREATED AS MEMBERS.—For purposes of 

12 this section, a graduate of a reserve officers’ train13 ing corps who receives a commission and who dies 

14 before receiving a first duty assignment shall be 

15 treated as a member of the Armed Forces who dies 

16 while on active duty. 

17 ‘‘(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This subsection ap18 plies to deaths on or after the date of the enactment 

19 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

20 Year 2020.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-724 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BURUNDI 

Signed at Bujumbura July 5, 2003 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
BURUNDI 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement signed at Bujumbura July 5, 2003; 

 Entered into force July 24, 2003.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOSEPH DURBIN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 289 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 11, 2020

t0909 

# Order

Clerk September 11, 2020

160815

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160815

COA: 344788

Wayne CC: 18

- 002872

- AR

ANNE MARIE LAMBERT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Novemb er 21, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of People v Pagano (Docket No. 159981) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the pre sent application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,996
<SECURITIES>                                    12,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                       411
<INVENTORY>                                     11,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,414
<PP&E>                                          26,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,853
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,557
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,943
<SALES>                                         20,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,577
<CGS>                                            6,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                       769
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,628
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06<F1><F3>
<FN>
<F1>On August 22, 1997, the Company effected a two-for-one split of its
outstanding shares of Common Stock. This Restated Financial Data Schedule reflects the
stock split.
<F2>Data listed for "EPS-PRIMARY" is the newly defined "BASIC EPS".
<F3>Data listed for "EPS-DILUTED" is the newly defined "DILUTED EPS".
</FN>


</TABLE>
(No. 6698

#### Sonny Williams, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1972.*

Sonny Williams, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.