alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5496 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5496

 To include Iceland in the list of foreign states whose nationals are 
      eligible for admission into the United States as E1 and E2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
             Government of Iceland, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2019

Ms. Pingree (for herself, Mr. Young, Mr. Larsen of Washington, and Mr. 
  Courtney) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include Iceland in the list of foreign states whose nationals are 
      eligible for admission into the United States as E1 and E2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
             Government of Iceland, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iceland Commercial and Economic 
Leadership for Arctic and National Development Act'' or the ``ICELAND 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS.

    For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Iceland 
shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such section if 
the Government of Iceland provides similar nonimmigrant status to 
nationals of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William A. Slade. Samuel Jacobs, Doing Business as Dependable Silk Company, Appellant; Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 343

 356

 391

 408

 605

 791

 698

 491

 457

 474

 463

 412

 426

 458

 434

 480

 452

 476

 622

 813

 778

 765

 946

 899

 784

 704

 567

 597

 541

 531

 233

 233

 238

 241

 248

 263

 247

 235

 232

 245

 245

 249

 256

 256

 255

 245

 230

 247

 257

 267

 261

 268

 272

 272

 271

 269

 274

 266

 245

 244

 262

 263

 272

 280

 350

 409

 372

 316

 308

 324

 330

 322

 300

 304

 302

 306

 295

 313

 371

 422

 395

 416

 467

 447

 419

 421

 384

 351

 329

 317

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,944

 3,927

 3,926

 3,929

 3,995

 4,128

 4,224

 4,269

 4,304

 4,341

 4,374

 4,375

 4,379

 4,412

 4,452

 4,495

 4,518

 4,551

 4,572

 4,585

 4,608

 4,708

 4,867

 4,990

 5,079

 5,178

 5,262

 5,309

 5,336

 5,347

 282

 281

 280

 281

 285

 295

 302

 305

 307

 310

 312

 313

 313

 315

 318

 321

 323

 325

 327

 328

 329

 336

 348

 356

 363

 370

 376

 379

 381

 382

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.38

 1,900.97

 1,901.54

 1,900.98

 1,901.35

 1,901.59

 1,901.14

 1,901.38

 1,901.05

 1,901.14

 1,901.52

 1,901.04

 1,900.87

 1,901.19

 1,901.24

 1,901.26

 1,901.13

 1,901.12

 1,901.04

 1,901.16

 1,901.18

 1,901.32

 1,901.31

 1,901.26

 1,901.20

 1,900.73

 1,901.02

 1,901.19

 1,901.25

 1,900.96

 1,900.54

 13,455

 13,889

 14,315

 13,896

 14,173

 14,352

 14,016

 14,195

 13,948

 14,016

 14,300

 13,941

 13,815

 14,053

 14,091

 14,105

 14,008

 14,001

 13,941

 14,031

 14,046

 14,150

 14,143

 14,105

 14,061

 13,712

 13,926

 14,053

 14,098

 13,882

 13,572

STORAGE

-710

+434

+426

-419

+277

+179

-336

+179

-247

+68

+284

-359

-126

+238

+38

+14

-97

-7

-60

+90

+15

+104

-7

-38

-44

-349

+214

+127

+45

-216

-310

CHANGE

1,664

2,254

2,246

1,826

2,164

2,049

1,868

2,032

1,887

1,935

2,073

1,946

2,317

2,569

2,860

2,744

2,696

2,688

2,640

2,627

2,649

2,644

2,601

2,595

2,619

2,609

2,521

2,693

2,683

2,520

2,681

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 30

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 31

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 79

 80

 76

POWER

 306

 305

 311

 310

 305

 308

 309

 310

 310

 309

 309

 310

 637

 906

 873

 921

 893

 874

 880

 876

 880

 879

 881

 882

 879

 880

 917

 931

 936

 918

 1,211

SPILL

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 135

 135

 135

 135

 135

 135

 135

 104

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 70

 84

OUTLETS

 6

 7

 10

 9

 7

 6

 7

 8

 6

 2

 7

 7

 5

 6

 5

 3

 8

 7

 7

 6

 6

 6

 5

 7

 6

 6

 6

 5

 7

 8

 5

C.F.S.

 .30

 .32

 .44

 .41

 .32

 .28

 .34

 .35

 .29

 .10

 .30

 .32

 .21

 .27

 .22

 .13

 .36

 .33

 .32

 .28

 .29

 .26

 .25

 .30

 .29

 .26

 .28

 .23

 .33

 .36

 .22

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -593 73,900 1,736 2,358 20,756 196 8.96

ACRE-FEET -593 146,581 3,443 4,677 41,170 389

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 3,443

TOTAL RIVER 49,290 146,787

 14,165

 97,497

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,575

 1,588

 1,575

 1,583

 1,577

 1,510

 1,586

 1,489

 1,561

 1,455

 1,479

 1,675

 1,654

 1,482

 1,828

 1,678

 1,709

 1,676

 1,648

 1,565

 1,620

 1,572

 1,584

 1,590

 1,621

 1,764

 1,355

 1,558

 1,583

 1,553

 1,461

 49,154

 97,497
### §4088. Confidential business information

The President may not release information received in connection with a review under this part which the President considers to be confidential business information unless the party submitting the confidential business information had notice, at the time of submission, that such information would be released by the President, or such party subsequently consents to the release of the information. To the extent a party submits confidential business information, it shall also provide a nonconfidential version of the information in which the confidential business information is summarized or, if necessary, deleted.

(Pub. L. 109–53, title III, §328, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 494.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Section effective on the date the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 1, 2006) and to cease to have effect on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, and, during any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA–DR country, to cease to have effect with respect to such country, see section 107 of Pub. L. 109–53, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 189

 194

 191

 191

 186

 184

 183

 176

 179

 174

 170

 175

 174

 170

 174

 170

 165

 168

 160

 158

 158

 153

 151

 155

 155

 152

 142

 147

 147

 171

 168

 176

 176

 167

 172

 173

 165

 161

 165

 159

 159

 157

 161

 151

 152

 157

 144

 144

 144

 144

 144

 144

 142

 144

 139

 131

 131

 131

 133

 175

 183

 183

 182

 178

 178

 176

 173

 169

 171

 166

 164

 166

 168

 160

 165

 163

 155

 156

 151

 151

 152

 148

 147

 149

 146

 143

 136

 139

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 586.51

 584.61

 583.69

 584.73

 585.25

 585.14

 585.08

 585.20

 585.16

 584.24

 583.18

 582.11

 582.58

 582.86

 584.18

 584.45

 585.55

 584.59

 583.46

 584.15

 584.84

 584.63

 584.09

 583.66

 583.49

 582.92

 582.80

 581.85

 582.25

 582.22

 23,460

 22,266

 21,702

 22,340

 22,664

 22,595

 22,557

 22,633

 22,607

 22,038

 21,392

 20,752

 21,032

 21,199

 22,001

 22,168

 22,852

 22,254

 21,562

 21,983

 22,408

 22,279

 21,946

 21,684

 21,580

 21,235

 21,164

 20,598

 20,835

 20,817

STORAGE

-13

-1,194

-564

+638

+324

-69

-38

+76

-26

-569

-646

-640

+280

+167

+802

+167

+684

-598

-692

+421

+425

-129

-333

-262

-104

-345

-71

-566

+237

-18

CHANGE

9,399

8,775

9,047

9,657

9,497

9,299

8,937

8,956

8,939

8,209

7,688

7,691

8,178

8,143

8,462

8,137

8,403

7,997

8,193

8,771

8,764

8,474

8,385

8,395

8,509

7,952

7,591

7,292

7,705

7,607

INFLOW

 9,399

 9,371

 9,325

 9,329

 9,329

 9,326

 8,951

 8,908

 8,944

 8,492

 8,011

 8,011

 8,033

 8,056

 8,053

 8,049

 8,053

 8,293

 8,537

 8,553

 8,545

 8,534

 8,549

 8,522

 8,558

 8,124

 7,625

 7,572

 7,584

 7,610

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 7

 6

 6

 6

 5

 8

 5

 10

 8

 4

 3

 3

 4

 3

 5

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 5

 5

 4

 5

 3

 2

 2

 5

 2

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,656 253,052 254,246 0 0 147

ACRE-FEET -2,656 501,929 504,297 0 0 292

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 504,297

SPILL 0

 23,473

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 2,474

 2,085

 2,045

 2,042

 2,011

 2,011

 2,070

 2,082

 2,080

 2,040

 2,065

 2,063

 2,081

 1,986

 1,528

 1,532

 1,524

 1,515

 1,150

 1,393

 1,460

 1,527

 1,526

 1,540

 1,468

 1,560

 1,943

 1,837

 1,947

 1,972

 54,557

 108,214

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,859

 6,931

 7,052

 7,517

 7,206

 7,194

 6,465

 6,568

 6,532

 6,136

 5,438

 5,386

 5,895

 5,891

 6,741

 6,363

 6,660

 6,200

 6,750

 7,149

 7,148

 6,676

 6,581

 6,582

 6,665

 6,234

 5,339

 5,087

 5,259

 5,152

 191,656

 380,150

Table 8
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2003 Session
FRANK ROBER

T BIGSBY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-50657 James K. C layton, Jr., Judge

No. M2002-02260-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 11, 2003

G ARY R. W ADE , P.J ., di ssent ing.

Iwrite separately

because I believe that in this instance the post-con viction c ourt's f

ailure to make specific findings of fact doe s not pr eclude appellate review. Tennesse e Code Annotated section 4 0-30-211 provides , in pertinent part , as follows:

(b) Upon the final disposition of every pe tition, the court shall enter a final order, and except where procee dings for delay ed appeal are allowed, shall set f orth inthe order or a written memorandum of the ca se all gro unds pres ented, a nd shall state the findings of fact and conclusions of law with re gard to each such gr ound.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-211(b ). In State v. Swanson , 680 S.W.2d 487, 489 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1984) (citi ng Br own v. State , 1 Tenn. Crim. App. 462, 445 S.W.2d 669 (1969)), this court interpreted

the predecessor

to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-211(b), which was identical to the current

provision, as mandatory. I n that case, however, this court observed that "the failure of the trial judge to abide by the requirement does not always mandate a reversal of the trial court 's judgment." Id. (citi ng Georg e v. State , 533 S.W.2d 322 (Ten n. Crim. Ap

p. 1975); Webb v. Stat

e , 4 Tenn. Cri

m. App. 723 , 475 S.W.2d ( 1971); Brown , 1 Te nn. Crim. App. 462, 445 S.W.2d 669). Becau se the purpose of the statute is to facilitate a ppel late r eview of the post -conv icti on cou rt's decision, a remand is not required when, even though the trial court failed to comply with the rule, the record

is otherw ise adequate for review. Id. In Swanson , the rec ord was d eemed sufficien

t to effec tuateappellate review where it contained " the reasons of the trial judge for dismissing appel lant's petition and the transcripts of both the evidentiary hearing he ld on app ellan t's post-convi ction peti tion and t he original t rial." Id.

Inthis case, the post-conviction co urt entered an order deny ing the p etition for postconvict ion relief but failed to make specific findings of f act regarding the pe

titioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The record contains the transcripts of the evidentiary hearing, the complete record of t

he ori ginal trial, and the post-conviction court's g eneral finding that the-2-

petitioner was "properly represented ." Implici t in t his ru ling, in my opinion, is the conclusion that trial counsel's performance wa s not defi cien t. It is my view that, under these circumstances, the record is adequate for our appe llate review of the substantive issue.

___________________________________ GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 3,457.28

 3,457.35

 3,457.34

 3,457.34

 3,457.34

 3,457.34

 3,457.34

 3,457.26

 3,457.22

 3,457.28

 3,457.47

 3,457.34

 3,457.33

 3,457.34

 3,457.28

 3,457.28

 3,457.28

 3,457.28

 3,457.28

 3,457.40

 3,457.47

 3,457.59

 3,457.71

 3,457.72

 3,457.84

 3,457.91

 3,457.96

 3,458.02

 32,672

 32,713

 32,707

 32,707

 32,707

 32,707

 32,707

 32,661

 32,638

 32,672

 32,781

 32,707

 32,701

 32,707

 32,672

 32,672

 32,672

 32,672

 32,672

 32,741

 32,781

 32,850

 32,919

 32,925

 32,993

 33,033

 33,062

 33,097

STORAGE

-35

+41

-6

+0

+0

+0

+0

-46

-23

+34

+109

-74

-6

+6

-35

+0

+0

+0

+0

+69

+40

+69

+69

+6

+68

+40

+29

+35

CHANGE

-3.6

35.7

12.0

17.6

19.6

21.6

17.0

-4.2

6.4

35.1

71.0

-20.3

15.0

22.0

1.4

18.0

20.0

19.0

19.0

52.8

37.2

51.8

52.8

21.0

50.3

39.2

33.6

36.9

INFLOW

 13

 14

 14

 16

 18

 20

 16

 18

 17

 17

 15

 16

 17

 18

 18

 17

 19

 18

 18

 17

 16

 16

 17

 17

 15

 18

 17

 17

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.6

 0.6

 0.6

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 1.0

 1.3

C.F.S.

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .030

 .034

 .031

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .056

 .070

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .51

 .00

 .00

 1.73

 .93

 .68

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .09

 1.57

 .66

 .11

 .84

 .17

 .69

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/26/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +390 697.9 469 28.0 0.0 4.1 .221 8.02

ACRE-FEET +390 1,384.3 930 55.5 0.0 8.1

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 930.3

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 55.5

 0.0

 523.6

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 26.12

 32,707

 406.6 8.02

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 3

 5

 5

 5

 6

 6

 7

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 9

 13

 16

 15

 13

 14

 14

 13

 13

 220

 436

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
### SUBCHAPTER VI—PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS SCHOOL DROPOUT PROBLEMS AND TO STRENGTHEN BASIC SKILLS INSTRUCTION
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5584 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify regulations concerning 

hours of service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2020 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify regulations concerning hours of service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom from Regu5 lating Edible Supplies and Horticulture Trucking Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘FRESH Trucking Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF HOURS OF SERVICE REGULA8 TIONS. 

9 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, the Secretary shall amend part 395 of title 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5584 IH

1 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to establish that, with 

2 respect to a motor carrier or driver transporting any agri3 cultural, horticultural, or floricultural commodity (includ4 ing both fresh and processed products, as well as sod and 

5 other agricultural products sensitive to temperature and 

6 climate and at the risk of perishing in transit)— 

7 (1) loading and unloading of commercial motor 

8 vehicles shall be excluded from on-duty time require9 ments; 

10 (2) there shall be no requirement of a 30- 

11 minute rest break within the first 8 hours of the 

12 hours of service on-duty requirements and such car13 rier or driver may take breaks at any time during 

14 trip; and 

15 (3) such carrier or driver may complete a 

16 scheduled trip if they are over the hours of service 

17 maximum on-duty drive schedule and are within 150 

18 miles of their scheduled delivery point. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,901.05

 1,901.12

 1,900.95

 1,900.82

 1,901.01

 1,901.13

 1,901.31

 1,901.36

 1,901.38

 1,901.38

 1,901.36

 1,901.23

 1,901.18

 1,901.50

 1,901.54

 1,901.31

 1,901.30

 1,901.01

 1,901.13

 1,901.08

 1,901.05

 1,901.02

 1,901.00

 1,900.98

 1,900.96

 1,901.17

 1,901.15

 1,901.14

 1,901.10

 1,901.08

 13,948

 14,001

 13,874

 13,779

 13,918

 14,008

 14,143

 14,180

 14,195

 14,195

 14,180

 14,083

 14,046

 14,285

 14,315

 14,143

 14,135

 13,918

 14,008

 13,971

 13,948

 13,926

 13,911

 13,896

 13,882

 14,038

 14,023

 14,016

 13,986

 13,971

STORAGE

-180

+53

-127

-95

+139

+90

+135

+37

+15

+0

-15

-97

-37

+239

+30

-172

-8

-217

+90

-37

-23

-22

-15

-15

-14

+156

-15

-7

-30

-15

CHANGE

627

770

726

720

795

828

785

795

750

707

711

915

1,236

1,762

1,305

626

1,027

1,850

1,873

1,816

723

721

718

705

713

807

714

717

700

711

INFLOW

 76

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 37

 0

 0

 0

 46

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 175

 165

 162

 158

 157

 156

 156

 159

 160

 161

 163

 165

 169

 165

 163

 198

 521

 1,230

 1,229

 1,197

 63

 60

 59

 125

 154

 156

 156

 155

 155

 157

SPILL

 58

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 86

 177

 177

 177

 174

 177

 177

 104

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

OUTLETS

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

C.F.S.

 .06

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .06

 .01

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .04

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -157 27,853 2,079 2,732 8,049 19 .90

ACRE-FEET -157 55,246 4,124 5,419 15,965 38

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,124

TOTAL RIVER 25,508 55,374

 14,128

 29,866

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 408

 433

 482

 465

 422

 482

 415

 470

 435

 400

 410

 654

 941

 1,332

 981

 413

 424

 551

 421

 415

 417

 414

 410

 403

 411

 417

 410

 410

 405

 406

 15,057

 29,866

Table 6