alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1093a. Articulation agreements

#### (a) Definition

In this section, the term "articulation agreement" means an agreement between or among institutions of higher education that specifies the acceptability of courses in transfer toward meeting specific degree or program requirements.

#### (b) Program to encourage articulation agreements

#### (1) Program established

The Secretary shall carry out a program for States, in cooperation with public institutions of higher education, to develop, enhance, and implement comprehensive articulation agreements between or among such institutions in a State, and (to the extent practicable) across State lines, by 2010. Such articulation agreements shall be made widely and publicly available on the websites of States and such institutions. In developing, enhancing, and implementing articulation agreements, States and public institutions of higher education may employ strategies, where applicable, including—

(A) common course numbering;

(B) a general education core curriculum;

(C) management systems regarding course equivalency, transfer of credit, and articulation; and

(D) other strategies identified by the Secretary.

#### (2) Technical assistance provided

The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to States and public institutions of higher education for the purposes of developing and implementing articulation agreements in accordance with this subsection.

#### (3) Rule of construction

Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize the Secretary to require particular policies, procedures, or practices by institutions of higher education with respect to articulation agreements.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, §486A, as added Pub. L. 110–315, title IV, §492, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3307.)
### SUBCHAPTER V—ASBESTOS SCHOOL HAZARD ABATEMENT
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 10

                                            9 September 1997



Raz Steinmetz
97 Haeshel Street

Dear Raz:


This letter confirms the terms under which you have been and will be employed by
Ampal Industries (Israel) Limited on a part time basis.  The terms of this
letter agreement shall be effective for all purposes as of 1 January 1997.

1.  You will be an employee of Ampal Industries (Israel) Limited and will
    devote not less than 50% of your business time to Ampal related matters. 
    Your work will involve strategic planning matters, review of new and
    existing investments and such other matters as you and the Chief Executive
    Officer of Ampal-American Israel Corporation ("Ampal US") determine to be
    appropriate.  

2.  As compensation for your services,  you will  receive a salary of
    US$100,000 per annum, payable in the equivalent in NIS and subject to all
    required income tax withholding.  Social benefits, as required by law and
    as agreed to between you and the Chief Executive Officer shall be in
    addition to this salary.  You will be also be entitled to reimbursement of
    all expenses incurred by you in connection with your employment and work
    for Ampal, subject to documentation in accordance with the customary
    policies of the company, and for reimbursement of your automobile expenses. 
    

3.  Your status as an employee of Ampal Industries (Israel) Limited may be
    terminated at any time by you or by Ampal (subject to the approval of the
    Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Ampal US) on not less than
    30 days prior notice.  The terms of this agreement may be amended by mutual
    agreement of you and the company provided such amendment is approved by the
    Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Ampal US and by the
    Related Party Committee of the Board of Directors of Ampal US.  

<PAGE>

                                          2


Please sign the enclosed copy of this letter to confirm your agreement to the
foregoing.  

Very truly yours,

Ampal Industries (Israel) Limited


By:  /s/ Yehoshua Gleitman                           
    ----------------------------


Accepted and agreed to:  


 /s/ Raz Steinmetz                               
--------------------------------
Raz Steinmetz
Per our discussion, we need Condition & Limitation No. 10 of this exemption changed to the 

wording of Condition & Limitation No. 3 from Exemption 10061 in order to conduct operations in 

accordance with standard Boeing flight test procedures. The justification for that change is as 

follows: 

· All demonstration and FCAA evaluation flights will be conducted to a flight test plan and 

at a minimum, a Test Director will be required on the flight deck to provide airplane configuration 

information and pilot action instructions from that flight test plan. 

· For FCAA flight evaluations we would expect to have at least a FCAA Flight Test 

Engineer onboard, in addition to the pilot, to record airplane information and pilot comments. 

· For customer demonstration flights, we would probably have one or more engineers 

onboard to answer questions related to airplane and systems operation. 

As noted, we need this exemption modified in a timely manner to support a long-planned 

Russian AR 787-8 Type Validation flight scheduled for 3 October, with pilot licensing to occur at 

the Seattle FSDO the morning of 2 October. 

Regards, 

Colin S. Fender 

The Boeing Company 

FTE – FAA Coordination 

Tel. 206-544-1974
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00755-CV

IN RE Carlos Y. BENAVIDES, JR. and wife, Leticia R. BENAVIDES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 18, 2011, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

emergency relief. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relators have not demonstrated they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are DENIED. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011PB681L2, styled In the Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos 

Benavides, Jr., An Incapacitated Person, pending in the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas, the 

Honorable Jesus Garza presiding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 203

 213

 216

 205

 205

 203

 201

 206

 208

 195

 197

 203

 200

 201

 203

 206

 196

 184

 181

 171

 176

 170

 170

 166

 162

 158

 162

 157

 163

 158

 188

 192

 201

 194

 194

 189

 189

 190

 190

 188

 187

 186

 188

 185

 184

 187

 181

 170

 168

 164

 163

 160

 158

 151

 149

 144

 148

 148

 146

 139

 196

 204

 207

 199

 199

 196

 194

 198

 198

 191

 191

 194

 194

 191

 194

 194

 188

 178

 174

 167

 169

 165

 163

 159

 157

 153

 155

 151

 155

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

GREENS LANDING ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 206

 195

 198

 196

 198

 195

 197

 194

 195

 206

 212

 199

 203

 206

 208

 208

 213

 208

 211

 213

 224

 222

 212

 210

 208

 223

 217

 208

 208

 206

 208

 187

 168

 183

 182

 176

 183

 185

 181

 181

 185

 189

 190

 172

 193

 186

 191

 197

 201

 203

 205

 206

 207

 204

 199

 200

 194

 175

 199

 174

 196

 198

 192

 187

 188

 189

 188

 187

 190

 187

 187

 192

 198

 194

 196

 198

 195

 200

 204

 205

 207

 209

 211

 210

 207

 204

 203

 208

 205

 204

 201

 201

 202

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 15, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 450.07

 449.84

 449.45

 449.38

 449.51

 449.51

 449.35

 449.28

 449.12

 449.17

 448.99

 448.83

 448.63

 448.47

 448.31

 448.09

 447.99

 447.95

 447.78

 447.62

 447.45

 447.25

 446.97

 446.55

 446.26

 446.07

 446.03

 445.98

 446.13

 446.11

 446.05

 972,963

 970,683

 966,821

 966,128

 967,415

 967,415

 965,831

 965,139

 963,557

 964,051

 962,272

 960,691

 958,717

 957,138

 955,560

 953,393

 952,408

 952,014

 950,340

 948,766

 947,095

 945,130

 942,381

 938,263

 935,423

 933,564

 933,173

 932,684

 934,151

 933,955

 933,368

 0

 0

 0

 1,419

 1,569

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL December 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2020 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -40,488 0 7,920 18,686

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-893

-2,280

-3,862

-693

 1,287

 0

-1,584

-692

-1,582

 494

-1,779

-1,581

-1,974

-1,579

-1,578

-2,167

-985

-394

-1,674

-1,574

-1,671

-1,965

-2,749

-4,118

-2,840

-1,859

-391

-489

 1,467

-196

-587

 144

 91

 86

 85

 94

 154

 247

 261

 304

 306

 264

 308

 304

 308

 303

 301

 289

 291

 292

 290

 278

 266

 274

 273

 255

 240

 244

 273

 274

 287

 534

2,563

-123

1,412

2,474

3,891

2,415

1,828

1,545

2,121

2,054

2,167

2,161

-16

93

162

-333

-400

-337

-375

-332

-366

-357

-311

-390

-347

-433

-310

-370

-596

-246

-558

ELEV STORAGE

 2,988

 365,311

 365,188

 366,600

 369,074

 372,965

 375,380

 377,208

 378,753

 380,874

 382,928

 385,095

 387,256

 387,240

 387,333

 387,495

 387,162

 386,762

 386,425

 386,050

 385,718

 385,352

 384,995

 384,684

 384,294

 383,947

 383,514

 383,204

 382,834

 382,238

 381,992

 381,434

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 362,748

2,500

0

1,500

1,500

2,500

2,500

2,000

2,000

3,000

2,000

2,500

2,500

500

500

500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

26,000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.81

 359.81

 359.81

 359.81

 359.81

 359.81

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.81

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 359.89

 359.83

 359.83

 359.83

 525

 525

 525

 525

 524

 524

 524

 524

 524

 524

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 524

 525

 525

 525

 525

 525

 529

 525

 525

 525

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+4

-4

+0

+0

CHANGE

 376

 391

 351

 351

 312

 273

 310

 367

 422

 395

 395

 391

 322

 324

 351

 321

 345

 356

 330

 297

 336

 399

 422

 385

 347

 326

 312

 321

 346

 376

 342

 152

 151

 153

 151

 153

 153

 153

 153

 153

 153

 152

 155

 155

 153

 152

 151

 152

 152

 152

 152

 151

 153

 151

 152

 153

 153

 156

 191

 251

 252

 216

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2015

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 5,030 10,892

ACRE-FEET +0 0 9,977 21,604

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 44,575

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 21,604

 76,156

 525

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,259

 1,249

 1,209

 1,236

 1,218

 1,134

 1,138

 1,192

 1,267

 1,245

 1,239

 1,246

 1,174

 1,174

 1,167

 1,136

 1,171

 1,192

 1,152

 1,113

 1,210

 1,291

 1,313

 1,307

 1,268

 1,172

 1,128

 1,168

 1,278

 1,342

 1,314

 37,702

 74,782

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 9,977

 746

 721

 722

 751

 773

 730

 697

 693

 712

 714

 713

 722

 723

 722

 689

 690

 700

 711

 696

 694

 750

 763

 760

 787

 785

 715

 681

 679

 712

 744

 778

 22,473

 44,575

RIVER CANALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 582.76

 582.58

 582.88

 583.77

 583.68

 583.18

 583.31

 583.79

 584.46

 584.24

 584.39

 584.76

 583.51

 583.93

 584.57

 582.50

 580.85

 582.11

 583.24

 585.72

 585.76

 583.42

 583.10

 583.46

 584.00

 584.77

 582.96

 584.67

 21,140

 21,032

 21,211

 21,750

 21,696

 21,392

 21,471

 21,763

 22,174

 22,038

 22,131

 22,359

 21,593

 21,848

 22,242

 20,985

 20,014

 20,752

 21,429

 22,959

 22,984

 21,538

 21,344

 21,562

 21,890

 22,365

 21,259

 22,303

STORAGE

-349

-108

+179

+539

-54

-304

+79

+292

+411

-136

+93

+228

-766

+255

+394

-1,257

-971

+738

+677

+1,530

+25

-1,446

-194

+218

+328

+475

-1,106

+1,044

CHANGE

3,345

3,452

3,592

3,773

3,503

3,277

3,357

3,425

3,474

3,197

3,318

3,414

2,901

3,395

3,455

2,675

2,796

3,662

3,635

4,049

3,435

2,611

3,152

3,395

3,426

3,463

2,632

3,801

INFLOW

 3,519

 3,505

 3,502

 3,500

 3,529

 3,428

 3,315

 3,276

 3,267

 3,266

 3,271

 3,299

 3,287

 3,263

 3,254

 3,309

 3,286

 3,290

 3,293

 1,699

 3,421

 3,339

 3,250

 3,284

 3,260

 3,172

 3,102

 3,187

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,579

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 51

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 26, 2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +814 93,610 91,373 1,579 221 28

ACRE-FEET +814 185,675 181,238 3,132 438 56

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 181,238

SPILL 3,132

 21,489

FISH TRAP 438

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 244

 239

 249

 269

 259

 254

 252

 261

 635

 2,316

 2,216

 2,531

 2,143

 1,656

 337

 306

 337

 384

 275

 2,464

 1,789

 1,763

 2,704

 2,280

 2,475

 2,162

 2,209

 1,705

 34,714

 68,855

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 2,953

 3,035

 3,107

 3,316

 3,115

 2,951

 3,119

 2,941

 2,485

 449

 553

 499

 502

 1,518

 3,186

 2,283

 2,235

 3,076

 2,890

 535

 0

 313

 72

 637

 0

 799

 0

 1,819

 48,388

 95,978

Table 8
§ 31.62 Persons making casual sales. Certain persons making casual sales of liquors are not dealers for purposes of this part and therefore are not required to register, keep records, or submit a report as required of dealers under this part. These persons are: ( a ) Administrators, executors, receivers, and other fiduciaries who receive liquors in their fiduciary capacities and sell them in one parcel or at public auction in parcels of not less than 20 wine gallons (75.7 liters);
( b ) Creditors who receive liquors as security for, or in payment of, debts and sell them in one parcel or at a public auction in parcels of not less than 20 wine gallons (75.7 liters);
( c ) Public officers or court officials who levy on liquors under order or process of any court or magistrate and sell them in one parcel or at public auction in parcels of not less than 20 wine gallons (75.7 liters); and
( d ) A retiring partner, or representative of a deceased partner, who sells liquors to the incoming or remaining partner, or partners, of a partnership.
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

§ 41.83 Penalties and forfeiture for products labeled or shipped for export. Except for the return of exported products that are specifically authorized under § 41.82(b) and (c): ( a ) Every person who sells, relands, or receives within the jurisdiction of the United States any tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes which have been labeled or shipped for exportation under parts 44 and 270 of this chapter;
( b ) Every person who sells or receives such relanded tobacco products or cigarette papers or tubes; and,
( c ) Every person who aids or abets in such selling, relanding, or receiving, shall, in addition to the tax and any other penalty provided for in title 26 U.S.C., be liable for a penalty equal to the greater of $1,000 or 5 times the amount of the tax imposed by title 26 U.S.C. All tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes relanded within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be forfeited to the United States and destroyed. All vessels, vehicles and aircraft used in such relanding or in removing such products, papers, and tubes from the place where relanded, shall be forfeited to the United States.
( d ) The provisions of this section do not apply to any person who, when entering U.S. manufactured tobacco products labeled for export, claims and is granted an exemption from duty and tax for such products under chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The quantity of tobacco products entered may not exceed the quantity limit imposed on such products under the applicable tariff provision. A traveler claiming an exemption under this subsection upon arrival at the border may voluntarily relinquish to the U. S. Customs Service at the time of entry any excess of such quantity without incurring the penalty under this section.
( e ) For purposes of this section, references to exportation shall be treated as including a reference to shipment to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
[T.D. ATF-465, 66 FR 45619, Aug. 29, 2001. Redesignated and amended by T.D. TTB-16, 69 FR 52424, 52425, Aug. 26, 2004]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALCARAZ-MENDIAZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70028

Agency No. A075-256-268

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alcaraz-Mendiaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

MAR 01 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70028

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d

889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely AlcarazMendiaz’s motion to reopen because it was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s

final removal order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to establish that he

was entitled to equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at

897 (deadline for filing a motion to reopen can be equitably tolled where a

petitioner acts with due diligence).

Alcaraz-Mendiaz’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,816
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,807,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          817,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     989,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,807,188
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (87,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (87,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (87,298)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (7)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (7)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.42 Authority of Appropriate TTB officers to enter premises.

Any appropriate TTB officer may enter in the daytime any premises where tobacco products are produced or kept, so far as it may be necessary for the purpose of examining such products. When such premises are open at night, any appropriate TTB officer may enter them, while so open, in the performance of his official duties. The owner of such premises, or person having the superintendence of the same, who refuses to admit any appropriate TTB officer or permit him to examine such products shall be liable to the penalties prescribed by law for the offense.

(68A Stat. 872, 903; 26 U.S.C. 7342, 7606)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 33, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975; T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28080, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 52 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986; T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011]