alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 225

 198

 184

 233

 345

 655

 924

 1,057

 1,392

 1,425

 2,065

 2,015

 1,509

 860

 684

 933

 674

 701

 1,102

 1,116

 1,329

 1,323

 1,147

 1,063

 1,161

 1,095

 876

 609

 407

 289

 254

 153

 155

 155

 158

 157

 162

 47

 176

 175

 169

 193

 226

 174

 184

 183

 168

 160

 155

 149

 161

 165

 156

 174

 168

 188

 206

 187

 164

 139

 146

 142

 173

 171

 168

 171

 183

 261

 322

 369

 433

 428

 495

 586

 488

 330

 282

 282

 237

 223

 238

 284

 373

 389

 355

 336

 363

 402

 353

 255

 209

 183

 166

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,172

 2,212

 2,248

 2,288

 2,338

 2,462

 2,644

 2,862

 3,134

 3,396

 3,714

 4,127

 4,426

 4,578

 4,687

 4,798

 4,867

 4,919

 4,974

 4,997

 5,048

 5,068

 4,990

 4,898

 4,766

 4,582

 4,447

 4,372

 4,299

 4,200

 4,129

 155

 158

 161

 163

 167

 176

 189

 204

 224

 243

 265

 295

 316

 327

 335

 343

 348

 351

 355

 357

 361

 362

 356

 350

 340

 327

 318

 312

 307

 300

 295

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 84.615 Conviction.

*Conviction* means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Ronald DeBiaso

*Hugh F. Keefe,*in support of the petition.

Submitted October 8

decided November 4, 1970

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         20,073
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,837,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (234,363)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,163
<PP&E>                                         391,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (228,920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,996,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,683,579
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    17,000
<COMMON>                                       190,793
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,894,447)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,996,925
<SALES>                                        9,110,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,110,051
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,639,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               290,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             450,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,269,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,269,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,269,679)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.50)



</TABLE>
Third Department,

May, 1943.

(May 5, 1943.)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Bingham Operating Corporation, Respondent, against W. Everett Eyrich et al., Constituting the Board of Review of the City of Binghamton, Appellants.

All concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12514 and #12515]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 04/05/2011. *Incident:*
                         Center Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         03/18/2011 through 03/20/2011. *Effective Date:*
                         04/05/2011. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/06/2011. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/05/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Inyo. Contiguous Counties: California: Fresno, Kern, Mono, San Bernardino, Tulare. Nevada: Clark, Esmeralda, Nye. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.563Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12514 5 and for economic injury is 12515 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, Nevada. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 5, 2011. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2011-8608 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
_____________ No. 95-4073NE

_____________ Victor Day, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Board of Regents of the * University of Nebraska; * [PUBLISHED] Pill Soon Song, * *

Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 13, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Victor Day appeals the district cour t's grant of summary judgment in Day's civil rights action. Day v. Board of Rege nts , 911 F. Supp. 1228 (D. Neb. 1995). Day contends the University of Nebr aska's decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived hi m of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the recor d and the p arties' briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief . Because th e controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that a n opinion would have noprecedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 540 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 3, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, 

as the ‘‘Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 540 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louise 

5 and Bob Slaughter Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louise and Bob 

10 Slaughter Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 2, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1911

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Mauricio Eduardo Bayardo Chan, also known as Amigo, also known as Friend,

also known as Mexico

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque

 ____________

 Submitted: January 24, 2020

Filed: February 6, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Mauricio Chan appeals after he pled guilty to drug and money-laundering

offenses, and the district court1 imposed a 300-month prison term. His counsel filed

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), suggesting that the district

court erred in applying three Guidelines enhancements.

Even assuming the district court erred in applying the challenged

enhancements, we conclude that any such error was harmless, in light of the court’s

statements at sentencing that Chan’s sentence was independent of the court’s

Guidelines calculations, that the sentence was based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

factors, and that the court believed the same sentence would have been appropriate

even if it had not applied the enhancements. See United States v. LaRoche, 700 F.3d

363, 365 (8th Cir. 2012) (misapplication of Guidelines is harmless if district court

would have imposed same sentence had it not relied on invalid factor); see also

United States v. Davis, 932 F.3d 1150, 1152 (8th Cir. 2019) (declining to address

argument that district court erred in calculating Guidelines, in light of alternative

sentencing determination that rendered issue moot).

Finally, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

1The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 219

 219

 217

 217

 218

 220

 225

 227

 225

 230

 231

 222

 228

 223

 217

 209

 214

 200

 205

 203

 202

 198

 185

 192

 183

 177

 182

 182

 180

 177

 163

 210

 209

 210

 211

 212

 213

 214

 215

 217

 217

 216

 216

 214

 210

 198

 192

 189

 186

 189

 184

 178

 167

 157

 152

 154

 155

 155

 152

 150

 150

 150

 214

 213

 213

 214

 215

 216

 218

 219

 220

 221

 222

 219

 219

 216

 210

 203

 198

 194

 194

 192

 186

 178

 168

 164

 163

 162

 161

 160

 160

 159

 157

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,034

 3,026

 3,019

 3,016

 3,017

 3,019

 3,021

 3,023

 3,025

 3,028

 3,032

 3,034

 3,037

 3,039

 3,035

 3,025

 3,010

 2,990

 2,969

 2,945

 2,913

 2,872

 2,820

 2,763

 2,704

 2,647

 2,589

 2,533

 2,483

 2,439

 2,398

 217

 216

 216

 215

 216

 216

 216

 216

 216

 216

 217

 217

 217

 217

 217

 216

 215

 214

 212

 210

 208

 205

 201

 197

 193

 189

 185

 181

 177

 174

 171

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Roger G. Little, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2007               By: /s/ Roger G. Little
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Roger G. Little
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President


            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
(No. 73-CC-388

#### Stern’s Carriage House, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Economic and Fiscal Commission, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 12, 1973.*

Routman and Lawley, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Presidential Documents

19891 

Federal Register 

Vol. 76, No. 68 

Friday, April 8, 2011 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13569 of April 5, 2011 

Amendments to Executive Orders 12824, 12835, 12859, and 

13532, Reestablishment Pursuant to Executive Order 13498, 

and Revocation of Executive Order 13507 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Executive Order 12824, of December 7, 1992 (‘‘Establishing the 

Transportation Distinguished Service Medal’’), as amended, is hereby further 

amended by striking ‘‘a member of the Coast Guard’’ in section 1 and inserting 

in lieu thereof ‘‘any member of the Armed Forces of the United States’’. 

Sec. 2. Executive Order 12835 of January 25, 1993 (‘‘Establishment of the 

National Economic Council’’), as amended, is hereby further amended by 

striking ‘‘(o) Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change;’’ 

in section 2 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(o) Chair of the Council on 

Environmental Quality;’’. 

Sec. 3. Executive Order 12859 of August 16, 1993 (‘‘Establishment of the 

Domestic Policy Council’’), as amended, is hereby further amended by striking 

‘‘(v) Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change;’’ in section 

2 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(v) Chair of the Council on Environmental 

Quality;’’. 

Sec. 4. Executive Order 13532 of February 26, 2010 (‘‘Promoting Excellence, 

Innovation, and Sustainability at Historically Black Colleges and Universities’’), is hereby amended by striking ‘‘34 C.F.R. 602.8’’ in section 4(a) 

and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘34 C.F.R. 608.2’’. 

Sec. 5. The President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood 

Partnerships, as set forth under the provisions of Executive Order 13498 

of February 5, 2009, is hereby reestablished and shall terminate 2 years 

from the date of this order unless extended by the President. 

Sec. 6. Executive Order 13507 of April 8, 2009 (‘‘Establishment of the White 

House Office of Health Reform’’), is hereby revoked. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRE0
19892 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Presidential Documents 

Sec. 7. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its 

officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

April 5, 2011. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8642 

Filed 4–7–11; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRE0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
### §4375. Trade negotiating objectives

The principal negotiating objectives of the United States shall include obtaining the objectives of the bilateral agreements described under section 4374(a) of this title for any trade agreements under negotiation as of February 24, 2016, or future trade agreement negotiations.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, §415, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 161.)
### §3234. Change of venue to another district—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Plea or disposal of case in district other than that in which defendant was arrested, Rule 20.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 826.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 912

 881

 839

 824

 830

 854

 878

 887

 877

 951

 949

 987

 1,003

 971

 959

 931

 955

 879

 893

 914

 949

 1,012

 985

 1,066

 1,082

 1,083

 1,071

 1,094

 1,104

 1,087

 1,081

 697

 711

 682

 645

 664

 610

 628

 631

 662

 669

 689

 707

 705

 697

 718

 759

 745

 705

 676

 669

 648

 663

 709

 740

 783

 791

 810

 809

 826

 813

 829

 786

 774

 746

 728

 713

 711

 715

 730

 745

 764

 781

 812

 810

 800

 812

 815

 815

 782

 754

 766

 786

 800

 813

 857

 900

 913

 930

 930

 940

 939

 940

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 702 625 649

2 673 613 635

3 752 618 646

4 738 618 652

5 769 622 653

6 811 630 672

7 842 634 681

8 886 631 689

9 807 634 680

10 815 638 691

11 831 640 694

12 856 649 709

13 843 655 718

14 779 656 700

15 783 662 698

16 782 663 695

17 814 665 702

18 829 669 719

19 816 684 731

20 824 693 729

21 825 695 730

22 856 697 734

23 865 696 744

24 884 697 745

25 916 695 761

26 936 696 774

27 942 699 778

28 998 695 804

29 970 706 791

30 966 701 799

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O

. 98-284

A I DA F E LIX , A PP EL L ANT ,

V

.
T OGO D. W EST , J R ., S EC RE T A RY O F V ET ER A N S A FF A I RS , A PPEL L EE

.

Be fore NEB EKER, Chief Judge , and I VERS and GREENE, J ud ge s.
O R D E R

On Oc tob e r 1 8, 19 99 , th e a pp e lla nt, thr ou g h c ou ns e l, m ov e d to sta y pr oc e e din g s in

thi s m at t er p en d i n g a d ec i s i o n b y t h e U

. S

. Di s t ri ct C o u rt fo r t h e D i s t ri ct o f P u er t o R i co o n t h e a p p el l an t 's
a c ti o n to e n f

o r c e th e F in a l St ip u lati o n a n d O r d e r in th e c ase of Gi u sti-Bravo v. U.S. V eterans Administrati on , 853 F.Supp. 34 (D.P.R. 1993). On De cembe r 22, 1999, this Court gra nted that mot io n a n d o r d e r e d th a t th e a p p e ll a n t, w it

h in 3 0 d a y s , n o ti f

y th e Se c r e ta

r y a n d th is Cour t of the
curr e n t s tatu s o f th e mo ti o n to e n f o r c e th e te r

ms o f th e F in a l St ip u lati o n a n d O r d e r in th e District Court and there afte r of a

ny subsequent ac tion taken by the Dis trict Court befor e J une 1, 2000. No response was re ceive d. On April 6, 2000, this Court order the appe llant to inform the Court of the
curr ent status of the motion by April 26, 2000, and show cause why this case should not be dismis sed for f ailure to c omply

with the Court's Rules. On April 26, 2000, the appe llant filed a re sponse to the Court's order explaining the status of the a ction to enforc e and e x plaining tha t if the District Court
we re to g ra

nt M rs . F e lix' s mo tio n b e fo re it, the a pp e a l be fo re thi s Co ur

t w ou ld b e c ome moo t. Up on c on sid e ratio n o f t

he fo re g oin g , it

is

ORDERED that Court' s April 6, 2000, order to show cause is withdrawn. I t is further ORDERED that the appe llant advise the C o u rt o f any action take n in this m atter by the District Court before J une 1, 2000.

DA TE D: Ma y

11 , 2 00 0 PER CU RI AM

.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of First Indiana Corporation (First Indiana), that, to his knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report of First Indiana on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Indiana.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 23, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert H. Warrington             
|                       |  |  |  | Robert H. Warrington                 
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Indiana Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Horace G. Allen, as Executor, etc., v. Neal D. Becker, Impleaded, etc.

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.