alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. -

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

EonorabloJohn C. Henburger CountyAttorney FayetteCounty IaGrange, Fezam

22,

### 190, reQu*at above rtated **Quo8** your letter of July prtmnt on the
OVide8 a8 fO11Oll8:
or any oiiloer 0S ObCt, 8OhoOl dl*- vision of tbl8 mate,

or &, sonrlrn 

### tho8ppointmeatto olerkahip, employsent or **duty,** latedWithin tba 8aOOnd degree **by** affinity or WIthin the third degree by OOIl8UA&tildt~ to the perron 80 appolntlng or 80 voting, or to any other member of any 8uoh bosrd, the Legi8lature, or oourt ot vhioh 8iMh pw’ron 00 appointing or votbg akay be a PYPb8I',

Vhen the 8*1-J, fOO8. OF Oolaprn8atLon of ruoh rppolnteo is to bo paid for, -eatly or lndirsotly, out of Or from public fund8 or fat?8 Of Off106 Ot my kind Or OhUaOt8r Vhd8OOV8r.'

!.

BonorableJohn C. J&&urger, pege 2

Artlole 433 of the Penal Code enuxeratea there to vbom t&& inhibltlons of thenOpOtl8m lau apply and lnoluded therein4re 8cbool truateer and a88iber8of oahool boardr. Therefore,a 8OhOOl board oarnot employ a teacher vho is relatedto any of the trwteer Vithin the prohlblted degree8 of rel8tlOnahip80 apeclfied in Article 432, quoted above.

Aooording to the fact8 under cogltatlon, the teeoherto be employed and the trurtee married flr8t ~0~81~. VlthOutany fie8it4tioll Ye 04Ji8ay the tO8OhOr 18 related t0 the vlfeof the trWte8 wlthln the seoond degroe by atflnlty, 8nd thequery 18 v,h8thesr or not 8he 1s related to the tru8teeuithlnthe 8ame degree.

You are oorreot that our OpinionNo. O-2225 1~ dlrectlg in point on th8 rubjeot under. oon8ideratlon, for there, PI in thl4 MQU48t, the 4WIt 8eriOU4 qUe8tiOn pre8ented 18 whether 4person 18 relatedby 4IlinLty to the hueband or wife of the bloodretitlve8 Of hi8 8pOU80. In that oplnlon, after 4n oxb8U8tivd re8e4rOh, 40 advised that under the Texas law the 8fflne4of ~JU apoure 4re the 4ffln88 of the Otbrj Or in other V~~AI,a parson is related within the 84~3 degree by aillnity 4% 18his spowe to the hurb4nd or Ulfe of the blood relative8 Of N8 8pOlUe. The reoant aa8e of Iron4 vr Stat., 142 Tex. Cr. R. 227, 152 9. w. (26) 359, OQnOUT8 with and 18 further aub- ~tantlatlonor the oonolualon

### l xpre88ed in raid *Won go. o-2225,and Ye llke418e 8dhere thereto.

It 18 the Opinion Of thi8 dOpartaent that under the f8Ct8oontained ln yOUA' wbmltted QW8tiOQ the tru8tea and the teacherto be employed are related within the aocond d8gree by aftlnlty,&id Articles 432 and 433, 8rlIX+, 

### prohlblt 8uoh employaent
. Y00urQw8tiOn, therefore, i8 an8WOrOd in the affirmat1ve. Your8 very truly

i'r. \' ATTORNBY GEKGIAL OF ‘RsI;bs


### Fredc. chandbr

A88isthnt

itOK:db Robert 0. Koch
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,376

 3,715

 4,272

 5,241

 5,492

 5,283

 5,168

 5,932

 5,679

 3,892

 2,339

 3,232

 2,826

 3,433

 3,369

 2,719

 1,427

 1,591

 1,771

 1,809

 1,938

 1,587

 1,290

 779

 581

 1,081

 2,465

 843

 988

 624

 966

 356

 376

 476

 524

 472

 489

 505

 448

 622

 569

 316

 366

 347

 332

 266

 258

 236

 239

 268

 298

 347

 360

 367

 360

 330

 315

 297

 334

 295

 266

 254

 837

 1,049

 1,272

 1,709

 2,004

 2,048

 2,018

 2,458

 2,720

 1,924

 1,006

 943

 739

 780

 752

 608

 419

 449

 578

 574

 689

 547

 538

 452

 401

 498

 698

 419

 403

 349

 384

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 19,493

 19,396

 19,272

 19,316

 19,264

 19,203

 19,575

 20,207

 21,169

 21,357

 21,005

 21,061

 21,331

 21,507

 21,422

 20,981

 20,128

 18,868

 17,442

 15,968

 14,639

 12,728

 10,546

 9,074

 8,469

 8,024

 7,983

 7,622

 7,273

 7,014

 6,979

 1,392

 1,385

 1,377

 1,380

 1,376

 1,372

 1,398

 1,443

 1,512

 1,526

 1,500

 1,504

 1,524

 1,536

 1,530

 1,499

 1,438

 1,348

 1,246

 1,141

 1,046

 909

 753

 648

 605

 573

 570

 544

 520

 501

 499

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Antonio Cassiso, Appellant, v. Warden of the City Prison, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
### FI LED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT A pril 2 9, 2005 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 03- 1535 7

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 2- 60 40 3 C V-DLG MICH AE L A . P US KA C, Pe tit ion er -Appe llant,

ve rs us SE CRE TA RY FO R T HE DE PA RT MEN T O F CO RRE CT IO NS , J a mes C r o s b y, Respondent -Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the S outhe rnD istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (A pr il 29, 200 5)2

Be fo re BL A CK , MA RC U S an d F A Y , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Petitioner Michael P uskac is a state prisoner who is curre ntly incarce rated fo r gr an d th ef

t. H e w as ini tia lly

c onvi ct ed

of both bu rg lary

a nd g rand the ft , how ev er his bur glary

c ha rg e ha s be endis m iss ed
. P ur suant t o 28 U
. S. C. § 22 54, Pu ska c fi le d ape tit ionf

or ha be as c or pus in f ed er al dis tr ic t c ourt. P uska c ar gue d, int er ali a , th athi s co un se l was co ns ti tu ti on al ly defi ci en t. T he dis tr ic t c ourt de nie d r el ie f an d gr an te d ac er tif ic at e of appe al ab ili ty (C O A ) on the f

oll ow ing ine ff

ec tiv e- as sis tanc e- of

-c ouns el c la im s: ( 1) f

ai lur e to ad equa te ly

m ove f or j udgm en t of

a cquit ta l; (2 ) fa ilure to inv es tig at e the va lue of the sto le n it em s; ( 3) f

ai lur e to o bj ec t t o th e j ur

y ins tr uc tio n c onc er

nin g th e bur glary c ha rg e; a nd ( 4) f

ai lur e to f ile am oti on t o r ec use a nd/ or pe tit ionf or w ri t of m an da m us when a co nt in ua nc e was de ni ed . Pus ka c m ov edto ex pa nd th e COA,
an d th is C ourt gr an te d th e m oti on o n th e fo llo w ing iss ue onl y : “ Whe the r the district court erre d in deny ing as a state lawissue not cognizable in a 28 U. S. C. § 22 54 p et iti on a

ppe llant’ s c la im

tha t ‘ [h ] e re ce ive d a n il le ga l se nte nc e w he n th e co urt di sm iss ed

the bur glary

c ha rg e, be ca

use nothin g w as le ft

to supp ort the ch arg e o f gr an d t he ft.’” W e h av e rev ie wedth e rec or d a nd th e arg um en ts , and we co nc lud e the dis tr ic t c ourt di d no t e rr in de ny ing P uska c’ s f

ed er al ha be as pe tit ion
. AFFIR MED.
13 C NMR in DMSO

- D6 :
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,431

 3,691

 3,987

 4,096

 4,323

 3,970

 3,162

 3,365

 3,869

 3,499

 3,537

 4,512

 3,348

 3,538

 3,205

 3,437

 4,024

 4,049

 3,107

 2,494

 2,405

 2,454

 2,473

 2,249

 2,978

 2,863

 3,539

 3,106

 2,999

 4,639

 3,667

 1,291

 1,224

 1,252

 1,361

 1,435

 1,250

 1,140

 1,242

 1,277

 1,280

 1,278

 1,234

 1,129

 1,142

 1,316

 1,179

 1,191

 1,228

 1,153

 936

 1,036

 1,144

 1,165

 1,197

 1,102

 1,126

 1,092

 1,074

 1,112

 1,166

 1,134

 2,158

 2,294

 2,417

 2,538

 2,609

 2,432

 2,124

 2,082

 2,125

 1,997

 2,085

 2,270

 2,023

 1,978

 2,055

 2,175

 2,272

 2,278

 1,902

 1,590

 1,689

 1,653

 1,613

 1,538

 1,596

 1,641

 1,850

 1,749

 1,777

 2,253

 2,142

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 21, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 26,072

 26,586

 27,156

 27,902

 28,764

 29,586

 30,146

 30,694

 31,162

 31,343

 31,200

 31,293

 31,147

 31,132

 31,029

 30,910

 30,765

 30,505

 29,798

 28,956

 28,521

 28,092

 27,580

 27,121

 26,632

 26,003

 25,830

 25,601

 25,323

 25,401

 25,271

 1,862

 1,899

 1,940

 1,993

 2,055

 2,113

 2,153

 2,192

 2,226

 2,239

 2,229

 2,235

 2,225

 2,224

 2,216

 2,208

 2,198

 2,179

 2,128

 2,068

 2,037

 2,007

 1,970

 1,937

 1,902

 1,857

 1,845

 1,829

 1,809

 1,814

 1,805

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.302 Notice to exporter. If, on examination of the TTB Form 5100.11 (and attached gauge reports, if any) received from the officer required to certify the same under the provisions of subpart N of this part, the appropriate TTB officer is of the opinion that the distilled spirits reported lost had been unlawfully diverted, or had been lost by theft, he will advise the exporter by letter: ( a ) Of the identity of the containers;
( b ) Of the amount of the loss;
( c ) Of the circumstances indicating diversion or theft;
( d ) That allowance of the loss will be subject to filing ( 1 ) proof that such loss is allowable under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5008 (a) and (f), and
( 2 ) claim for remission of the tax on the spirits so lost; and
( e ) That action in respect of the loss will be withheld for a period of not more than 30 days to afford an opportunity to file such proof and claim.
In any case in which distilled spirits are lost during transportation, as described in § 28.301, whether by theft or otherwise, the appropriate TTB officer may require the exporter to file a claim for relief in accordance with § 28.303. When circumstances may warrant, extensions of additional time for submission of the proof and claim may be granted by the appropriate TTB officer. Where such proof and claim are not filed within the 30-day period, or such extensions as the appropriate TTB officer may grant, the tax on the distilled spirits diverted or lost will be assessed, or liability asserted against the bond covering the shipment, as the case may be. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1323, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5008))
[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-48, 44 FR 55854, Sept. 28, 1979; T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71726, Dec. 11, 1979; T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3834, Jan. 27, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,901.02

 1,901.18

 1,901.57

 1,901.20

 1,901.14

 1,901.61

 1,901.30

 1,901.14

 1,901.07

 1,900.84

 1,901.32

 1,901.23

 1,901.26

 1,901.22

 1,901.37

 1,901.44

 1,901.46

 1,901.15

 1,901.06

 1,900.76

 1,900.94

 1,901.57

 1,901.46

 1,901.65

 1,901.20

 1,901.23

 1,901.16

 1,901.24

 13,926

 14,046

 14,337

 14,061

 14,016

 14,367

 14,135

 14,016

 13,963

 13,793

 14,150

 14,083

 14,105

 14,076

 14,188

 14,240

 14,255

 14,023

 13,956

 13,734

 13,867

 14,337

 14,255

 14,397

 14,061

 14,083

 14,031

 14,091

STORAGE

-45

+120

+291

-276

-45

+351

-232

-119

-53

-170

+357

-67

+22

-29

+112

+52

+15

-232

-67

-222

+133

+470

-82

+142

-336

+22

-52

+60

CHANGE

1,357

1,413

1,502

1,223

1,301

1,551

1,242

1,303

1,362

1,273

1,543

1,315

1,398

1,348

1,398

1,401

1,372

1,375

1,988

1,955

2,129

2,222

1,900

2,035

1,812

1,154

1,099

1,174

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 40

 0

 0

 50

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 215

 255

 255

 205

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

SPILL

 125

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

OUTLETS

 0

 2

 1

 1

 0

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 2

 0

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

C.F.S.

 .01

 .10

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .10

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .05

 .09

 .02

 .01

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .10

 .01

 .08

 .05

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .08

 .11

 .04

 .07

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 13, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +120 42,145 2,010 1,340 5,130 28 1.68

ACRE-FEET +120 83,595 3,987 2,658 10,175 56

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 3,987

TOTAL RIVER 16,820 83,422

 13,971

 66,602

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,000

 1,051

 1,054

 1,061

 1,024

 1,072

 1,057

 1,063

 1,089

 1,059

 1,062

 1,047

 1,087

 1,063

 1,042

 1,074

 1,064

 1,190

 1,722

 1,765

 1,761

 1,684

 1,639

 1,662

 1,679

 841

 824

 842

 33,578

 66,602

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 580.67

 581.52

 581.38

 581.90

 579.28

 582.05

 580.16

 583.41

 581.56

 578.26

 581.01

 583.12

 581.07

 582.75

 582.80

 584.93

 584.88

 584.35

 584.33

 584.80

 584.40

 584.18

 584.44

 585.46

 585.80

 586.00

 586.00

 585.12

 585.89

 583.82

 582.32

 19,910

 20,405

 20,323

 20,627

 19,119

 20,716

 19,616

 21,532

 20,428

 18,554

 20,106

 21,356

 20,141

 21,134

 21,164

 22,464

 22,433

 22,106

 22,094

 22,384

 22,137

 22,001

 22,161

 22,796

 23,009

 23,135

 23,135

 22,582

 23,066

 21,781

 20,877

STORAGE

-506

+495

-82

+304

-1,508

+1,597

-1,100

+1,916

-1,104

-1,874

+1,552

+1,250

-1,215

+993

+30

+1,300

-31

-327

-12

+290

-247

-136

+160

+635

+213

+126

+0

-553

+484

-1,285

-904

CHANGE

48,335

49,055

48,244

41,170

33,285

30,530

24,492

22,333

17,316

14,780

14,607

12,482

9,494

9,194

7,423

7,011

5,988

5,664

5,575

5,525

5,065

4,896

4,901

4,912

4,625

4,661

4,748

4,216

4,679

3,701

4,044

INFLOW

 10,587

 10,513

 10,434

 10,509

 10,787

 11,111

 11,405

 11,691

 11,981

 12,754

 13,683

 11,764

 10,019

 8,605

 7,320

 6,267

 5,915

 5,740

 5,492

 5,291

 5,101

 4,876

 4,732

 4,504

 4,433

 4,511

 4,662

 4,408

 4,347

 4,261

 4,414

POWER

 38,000

 38,292

 37,850

 30,507

 23,256

 18,612

 13,640

 9,588

 5,804

 2,884

 52

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 3

 0

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 0

 1

 1

 2

 3

 3

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 21, 2004

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +461 462,951 242,117 218,485 2,040 80

ACRE-FEET +461 918,263 480,239 433,365 4,046 159

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 480,239

SPILL 433,365

 20,416

FISH TRAP 4,046

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 1,598

 1,777

 1,094

 4,270

 4,249

 4,195

 4,186

 4,190

 4,224

 4,199

 4,139

 4,246

 4,204

 4,172

 3,019

 2,987

 2,176

 1,751

 1,941

 2,399

 1,905

 2,346

 3,983

 3,653

 3,777

 4,297

 4,297

 3,854

 3,856

 2,817

 2,337

 102,138

 202,591

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 48,525

 49,290

 49,256

 38,806

 31,016

 27,834

 21,942

 19,852

 14,964

 11,887

 10,690

 8,279

 5,285

 5,035

 4,281

 3,870

 3,592

 3,594

 3,352

 2,864

 2,916

 2,263

 497

 948

 451

 25

 25

 25

 604

 628

 1,434

 374,030

 741,889

Table 8
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

§ 40.46 Emergency variations from requirements. The appropriate TTB officer may approve methods of operation other than as specified in this part, where he finds that an emergency exists and the proposed variations from the specified requirements are necessary, and the proposed variations— ( a ) Will afford the security and protection to the revenue intended by the prescribed specifications.
( b ) Will not hinder the effective administration of this part, and
( c ) Will not be contrary to any provision of law.
Variations from requirements granted under this section are conditioned on compliance with the procedures, conditions, and limitations set forth in the approval of the application. Failure to comply in good faith with such procedures, conditions, and limitations shall automatically terminate the authority for such variations and the manufacturer thereupon shall fully comply with the prescribed requirements of regulations from which the variations were authorized. Authority for any variations may be withdrawn whenever in the judgment of the appropriate TTB officer the revenue is jeopardized or the effective administration of this part is hindered by the continuation of such variation. Where a manufacturer desires to employ such variation, he shall submit a written application to do so, in triplicate, to the appropriate TTB officer. The application shall describe the proposed variations and set forth the reasons therefor. Variations shall not be employed until the application has been approved. The manufacturer shall retain, as part of his records, any authorization of the appropriate TTB officer under this section.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 19 - 40517 United States of America, Plaintiff
— Appellee , versus Alejandro Pineda - Campuzano, Defendant
— Appellant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18 - CR - 1425 - 1 Before Jolly, Elrod, and Graves, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam : * Alejandro Pineda - Campuzano challenges the 60 - month prison sentence and four - year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute approximately 212 kilograms of marijuana. Pineda - Campuzano ar gues that the district court erred in finding him ineligible for safety - valve relief under

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determine d that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 28, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40517 Document: 00516072942 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2021No. 19 - 40517

2 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), and in imposing special conditions of supervised release in the written judgment that were not orally pronounced at sentence. With respect to sa fety - valve relief under § 3553(f), Pineda - Campuzano claims that his Texas conviction for Assault - Family Violence is not a “violent offense” and that he is therefore not disqualified from relief on that basis. We previously affirmed the district court’s den ial of safety - valve relief but determined that the court’s imposition of special conditions of release that were not orally pronounced at sentence was an abuse of discretion. United States v. Pineda - Campuzano , 812 F. App’x 293, 294 (5th Cir. 2020) (per cur iam) . Pineda - Campuzano filed a petition for certiorari, and the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Borden v. United States , 1 41 S. Ct. 1817 (2021) . Pineda - Campuzano v. United States , 141 S. Ct. 2784 (2021) (mem.). The government concedes that post - Borden , Pineda - Campuzano’s Texas conviction is not a “violent offense” under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) because it may be committed with a mens rea of recklessness . For this reason, the parties agree that Pineda - Ca mpuzano is not precluded from safety - valve relief on that basis. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for resentencing consistent with Borden v. United States , 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021) . Case: 19-40517 Document: 00516072942 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0213

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

EDWARD HAROL HUGGLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 8, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2021

01/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0213
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Phoenixville Hospital, LLC, :

Appellant : CASES CONSOLIDATED

:

v

. : No. 1281 C.D. 2021

:

County of Chester Board of :

Assessment Appeals, :

Phoenixville Area School District :

and Borough of Phoenixville :

Phoenixville Hospital, LLC

, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1285 C.D. 2021

:

County of Chester Board of :

Assessment Appeals and :

Phoenixville Area School District :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, April 14, 2023

, having considered A ppellant ’ s application for

reargument and A ppellee s ’ answer s in response thereto , the application is DENIED

.
#### § 19.395 Manufacture of articles.

A proprietor must manufacture, label, mark and dispose of articles in accordance with part 20 of this chapter.

(26 U.S.C. 5273)
/s/ Heung Gon KimName:
    Heung Gon KimTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the month of June, 2011
 Commission File Number 333-105024
 
 CASCADES INC.
 404 Marie-Victorin Blvd.
Kingsey Falls, Quebec
Canada J0A 1B0
  o þ
 o
 o
  o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESExhibit IndexEX-99.1    Table of Contents   Exhibit Number
    
    Document99.1
    
    Press Release




---



##### Table of Contents



CASCADES INC.By:
    /s/ Robert F. HallName:
    Robert F. HallTitle:
    Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit Number
    
    Document99.1
    
    Press Release
### SUBCHAPTER II—TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE (STANDARDS)