alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
475 P.2d 327

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert SANDERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9043.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 5, 1970.

*62Lowell Stout, Plobbs, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for .appellee.

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

Robert Sanders, Jr., filed motions on October 29, 1969, in the District Court of Lea County, New Mexico, under Rule 93, Rules of Civil Procedure (§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp., 1967 Pocket Supp.), to set aside sentences and judgments on charges of unarmed robbery, kidnapping and unlawfully and carnally knowing and abusing a female minor under the age of ten years. The motions were consolidated and denied by order of the court on November 3, 1969, without a hearing.

Sanders has sought relief in the Federal Court, as well as three times in this court. Sanders v. Cox, 74 N.M. 524, 395 P.2d 353 (1964); State v. Sanders, 79 N.M. 587, 446 P.2d 639 (1968).

Sanders contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to vacate the judgments and sentences imposed on him.

' The only pertinent issue presented in the petition before us, which has not heretofore been passed upon by this -court, is the contention that he was not indicted by a grand jury and, therefore, his constitutional rights have been violated. This contention is without merit as it ■ is not supported by anything other than his previous motions to vacate judgment and sentences.

Article II, § 14, New Mexico Constitution, provides for presentment or indictment by a grand jury or information filed by the district attorney or attorney general.

Sanders also contends that his constitutional rights were violated because the motions for post conviction relief were denied without a hearing. The record before us does not warrant relief, therefore, the denial without a hearing was. .proper. Where the motions, files and records of the case show conclusively (as in the present case) that defendant is not entitled to relief, a hearing is not required. See, State v. McCroskey, 79 N.M. 502, 445 P.2d 105 (Ct.App.1968), with which we agree.

Finding no error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., and McKENNA, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934







I, Eugene E. Eichler, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Save the World Air, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: August 14, 2009
/s/ EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene E. EichlerInterim Chief Financial Officer
(No. 6948

#### D. Adolphus Rivers, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Illinois Fair Employment Practices Commission, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 15, 1972.*

D. Adolphus Rivers, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 360.66

 360.63

 360.63

 360.63

 360.96

 360.96

 360.93

 360.96

 360.96

 360.99

 360.99

 361.34

 361.37

 361.40

 361.37

 361.34

 361.37

 361.34

 361.34

 361.15

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.18

 361.00

 361.18

 360.99

 361.01

 583

 581

 581

 581

 604

 604

 602

 604

 604

 606

 606

 631

 633

 635

 633

 631

 633

 631

 631

 618

 620

 620

 620

 620

 620

 620

 607

 620

 606

 608

STORAGE

+2

-2

+0

+0

+23

+0

-2

+2

+0

+2

+0

+25

+2

+2

-2

-2

+2

-2

+0

-13

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-13

+13

-14

+2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 64

 77

 92

 105

 106

 149

 173

 189

 210

 223

 215

 192

 189

 205

 213

 224

 229

 218

 212

 231

 241

 254

 262

 278

 293

 279

 208

 1,301

 1,307

 1,307

 1,310

 1,726

 2,000

 2,002

 2,028

 2,026

 2,022

 2,043

 2,655

 3,066

 3,113

 3,061

 3,017

 3,018

 3,048

 3,019

 2,637

 2,532

 2,552

 2,525

 2,560

 2,568

 2,543

 2,529

 2,546

 2,174

 2,003

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2011

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +27 0 70,238 5,331

ACRE-FEET +27 0 139,317 10,574

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 36,996

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 10,574

 186,887

 581

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,233

 1,236

 1,236

 1,343

 1,763

 2,070

 2,392

 2,662

 2,698

 2,714

 2,794

 3,522

 3,961

 3,999

 4,131

 3,918

 3,929

 4,034

 4,076

 3,767

 3,704

 3,671

 3,655

 3,680

 3,625

 3,568

 3,591

 3,613

 3,212

 3,047

 92,844

 184,156

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 139,317

 6

 6

 6

 44

 54

 62

 361

 624

 638

 642

 663

 735

 770

 792

 794

 770

 759

 842

 899

 951

 979

 919

 893

 897

 822

 753

 749

 745

 706

 771

 18,652

 36,996

RIVER CANALS
### Part B—Rural Education Initiative
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.170 Physical inventory.

Once in each calendar year and when requested by an appropriate TTB officer, each permittee shall perform and record a physical inventory of each formulation of new and recovered specially denatured spirits.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0062)

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, 59459, Aug. 30, 2016]
### §§1941 to 1944. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section 1941, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §322, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 892, set out qualifying requirements for trade readjustment allowances. See section 2291 of this title.

Section 1942, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §323, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 893, set out provisions covering weekly amount for trade readjustment allowances. See section 2292 of this title.

Section 1943, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §324, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 894, set out time limitations for trade readjustment allowances. See section 2293 of this title.

Section 1944, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §325, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 894, provided for application of State laws. See section 2294 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on 90th day following Jan. 3, 1975, see note set out under section 1901 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 585.83

 586.45

 583.95

 585.19

 586.40

 586.39

 586.03

 585.57

 586.40

 584.82

 584.85

 585.97

 585.04

 585.03

 585.13

 580.49

 581.13

 581.75

 581.48

 581.77

 582.35

 582.90

 584.21

 584.33

 585.03

 585.82

 585.24

 584.88

 585.16

 584.37

 23,028

 23,422

 21,860

 22,626

 23,390

 23,383

 23,154

 22,865

 23,390

 22,396

 22,414

 23,116

 22,532

 22,526

 22,589

 19,806

 20,176

 20,540

 20,381

 20,551

 20,895

 21,223

 22,020

 22,094

 22,526

 23,022

 22,658

 22,433

 22,607

 22,118

STORAGE

+483

+394

-1,562

+766

+764

-7

-229

-289

+525

-994

+18

+702

-584

-6

+63

-2,783

+370

+364

-159

+170

+344

+328

+797

+74

+432

+496

-364

-225

+174

-489

CHANGE

7,274

7,319

6,344

7,550

7,567

7,230

7,075

6,986

7,407

6,674

7,189

7,534

7,282

7,576

7,611

6,664

8,271

8,272

8,008

8,169

8,255

8,178

8,462

8,097

8,273

8,308

8,357

8,417

8,614

8,285

INFLOW

 7,022

 7,112

 7,123

 7,156

 7,174

 7,226

 6,947

 7,126

 7,138

 7,170

 7,175

 7,176

 7,571

 7,573

 7,573

 8,059

 8,076

 8,081

 8,080

 8,075

 8,074

 8,005

 8,052

 8,053

 8,047

 8,050

 8,533

 8,521

 8,518

 8,524

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 234

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 9

 6

 4

 5

 5

 4

 5

 6

 6

 8

 8

 7

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 7

 8

 8

 8

 9

 8

 8

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 8, 2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -427 231,248 231,010 234 0 217

ACRE-FEET -427 458,680 458,208 464 0 430

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 458,208

SPILL 464

 22,545

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 235

 1,157

 772

 871

 77

 77

 624

 1,071

 763

 750

 1,028

 1,483

 1,765

 1,840

 1,229

 788

 843

 728

 1,278

 1,599

 1,566

 915

 1,225

 1,467

 1,349

 1,427

 375

 1,007

 1,019

 1,766

 31,094

 61,675

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 6,698

 5,824

 5,348

 6,323

 7,080

 6,736

 6,109

 5,510

 6,168

 5,529

 5,835

 5,572

 5,120

 5,323

 5,957

 5,462

 7,083

 7,079

 6,321

 6,153

 6,350

 6,098

 4,964

 6,075

 6,525

 6,556

 7,560

 6,956

 7,043

 6,040

 185,397

 367,735
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,704

 2,685

 3,028

 3,348

 3,949

 4,255

 4,105

 3,651

 3,531

 3,368

 2,615

 2,171

 1,884

 1,552

 1,182

 1,203

 1,215

 1,148

 1,053

 965

 887

 825

 777

 772

 710

 639

 620

 589

 566

 564

 513

 1,059

 1,070

 1,057

 1,099

 1,138

 1,200

 1,339

 1,330

 1,264

 1,272

 1,223

 1,018

 1,014

 983

 884

 835

 818

 793

 774

 762

 751

 709

 669

 681

 622

 567

 544

 503

 503

 437

 426

 1,550

 1,526

 1,517

 1,661

 1,834

 2,185

 2,252

 2,035

 1,958

 2,034

 1,654

 1,449

 1,328

 1,216

 1,025

 961

 937

 909

 887

 852

 811

 765

 736

 716

 664

 606

 574

 541

 530

 492

 455

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 23,444

 23,483

 23,440

 23,380

 23,491

 24,050

 24,659

 24,818

 24,756

 24,874

 24,884

 24,757

 24,516

 24,199

 23,674

 23,109

 22,529

 21,777

 20,830

 19,497

 18,056

 16,786

 15,564

 14,246

 13,256

 12,413

 11,659

 10,984

 10,489

 10,020

 9,538

 1,675

 1,677

 1,674

 1,670

 1,678

 1,718

 1,761

 1,773

 1,768

 1,777

 1,777

 1,768

 1,751

 1,729

 1,691

 1,651

 1,609

 1,556

 1,488

 1,393

 1,290

 1,199

 1,112

 1,018

 947

 887

 833

 785

 749

 716

 681

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,848,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,519,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,063
<INVENTORY>                                  1,578,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,234,937
<PP&E>                                      14,700,530
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,675,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,372,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,101,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           38,615
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,232,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,372,414
<SALES>                                      2,154,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,531,620
<CGS>                                        1,313,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,183,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                472,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                   205,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            267,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   267,212
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,799

 1,817

 1,602

 1,375

 1,282

 1,240

 1,200

 1,174

 1,162

 1,162

 1,214

 1,253

 1,220

 1,213

 1,212

 1,233

 1,243

 1,322

 1,314

 1,260

 1,226

 1,213

 1,175

 1,145

 1,097

 1,077

 1,038

 1,000

 915

 846

 888

 1,030

 1,110

 1,047

 1,033

 1,023

 1,009

 1,040

 1,027

 1,044

 1,055

 1,038

 1,028

 1,034

 1,033

 1,013

 1,011

 1,020

 1,014

 1,030

 1,003

 1,013

 1,033

 1,007

 922

 922

 958

 898

 819

 767

 629

 487

 1,331

 1,366

 1,283

 1,220

 1,180

 1,160

 1,143

 1,124

 1,109

 1,108

 1,123

 1,142

 1,145

 1,141

 1,134

 1,142

 1,146

 1,175

 1,175

 1,143

 1,143

 1,133

 1,093

 1,052

 1,043

 1,034

 986

 924

 854

 776

 692

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### Part B—Centers of Excellence
### subpart 2—standards-related measures
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 252

 243

 234

 239

 240

 237

 240

 242

 243

 251

 249

 258

 267

 276

 292

 310

 280

 298

 257

 254

 253

 254

 260

 262

 262

 264

 265

 262

 254

 255

 263

 220

 222

 223

 225

 227

 228

 231

 231

 234

 233

 235

 236

 237

 236

 238

 239

 235

 239

 239

 240

 236

 238

 237

 236

 236

 227

 233

 232

 227

 229

 228

 226

 227

 229

 230

 232

 233

 234

 235

 237

 239

 240

 241

 243

 245

 248

 252

 249

 251

 246

 246

 243

 243

 243

 244

 244

 242

 240

 239

 236

 235

 236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,066

 3,063

 3,062

 3,064

 3,081

 3,104

 3,130

 3,150

 3,174

 3,199

 3,224

 3,248

 3,269

 3,291

 3,313

 3,338

 3,358

 3,379

 3,393

 3,406

 3,415

 3,423

 3,429

 3,434

 3,438

 3,439

 3,436

 3,430

 3,418

 3,401

 3,388

 219

 219

 219

 219

 220

 222

 224

 225

 227

 229

 230

 232

 234

 235

 237

 238

 240

 241

 242

 243

 244

 245

 245

 245

 246

 246

 245

 245

 244

 243

 242

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Ampal-American Israel Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned executive officers of the Company certifies, to the best of such executive officer’s knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Yosef A. Maiman

/s/ Irit EluzYosef A. Maiman
Irit EluzChairman of the Board, President and CEO
CFO and Senior Vice President Finance and TreasurerAmpal-American Israel Corporation
Ampal-American Israel CorporationMay 5, 2010
May 5, 2010




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OFAPPEALS OFTHE STATE OFWASHINGTON

JASON E. SLOTEMAKER 

## ) No. 78665-2 

## ) Appellant, 

## ) DIVISION ONE



## ) v. 

## ) THE STATE OFWASHINGTON, 

## ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondent.

__________________________________

## ) FILED: July 15, 2019 PER CURIAM

—Jason Slotemaker appeals his conviction forcyberstalking, arguing that the cyberstalking statute, RCW 9.61.260, is unconstitutionally overbroad underthe Washington State and United States Constitutions. While his appeal was pending, the United States District Courtforthe Western District of Washington ruled that RCW 9.61.260(1 )(b) is facially overbroad and violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Rynearson v. Ferguson, No. 3:17-cv5531 (W.D. Wash. 2019). The district 

### court permanentlyenjoined the attorney general and prosecuting attorneyfrom enforcing the statute against Rynearson. Citing Rynearson, the State in this case concedes error, stating that it “no longer believes it appropriate to challenge this appeal” and requesting a “remand with directions to dismiss the conviction with prejudice.” Amici Curiae

—American Civil Liberties Union ofWashington, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

-- agree that the statue is unconstitutional and request a published opinion to provide guidance.No. 78665-2-1/2
We acceptthe State’s concession, denyAmici’s requestfor a published opinion, and reverse and remand for dismissal ofthe conviction with prejudice.

FOR 

### THE COURT: 

# ‘V
### §668c. Definitions

As used in this subchapter "whoever" includes also associations, partnerships, and corporations; "take" includes also pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb; "transport" includes also ship, convey, carry, or transport by any means whatever, and deliver or receive or cause to be delivered or received for such shipment, conveyance, carriage, or transportation.

(June 8, 1940, ch. 278, §4, 54 Stat. 251; Pub. L. 92–535, §4, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1065.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–535 substituted "poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest" for "wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, or otherwise willfully molest".
Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 12

Case 20-31643-KLP    Doc 23    Filed 08/28/20    Entered 08/28/20 14:41:13    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 12