alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Elva  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Eric
Danon,  Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) and Chief Financial
Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/ Eric Danon
------------------------------------------
Eric Danon
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
May 17, 2004
### **CHAPTER 2—ACTS AND RESOLUTIONS; FORMALITIES OF ENACTMENT; REPEALS; SEALING OF INSTRUMENTS**

Sec.
101.
Enacting clause.
102.
Resolving clause.
103.
Enacting or resolving words after first section.
104.
Numbering of sections; single proposition.
105.
Title of appropriation Acts.
106.
Printing bills and joint resolutions.
106a.
Promulgation of laws.
106b.
Amendments to Constitution.
107.
Parchment or paper for printing enrolled bills or resolutions.
108.
Repeal of repealing act.
109.
Repeal of statutes as affecting existing liabilities.
110.
Saving clause of Revised Statutes.
111.
Repeals as evidence of prior effectiveness.
112.
Statutes at Large; contents; admissibility in evidence.
112a.
United States Treaties and Other International Agreements; contents; admissibility in evidence.
112b.
United States international agreements and non-binding instruments; transparency provisions.
113.
"Little and Brown's" edition of laws and treaties; slip laws; Treaties and Other International Act  1 Series; admissibility in evidence.

114.
Sealing of instruments.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5947(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3481, added item 112b and struck out former item 112b "United States international agreements; transmission to Congress".

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–403, §2, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 619, added item 112b.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–497, §2, July 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 271, inserted "slip laws; Treaties and Other International Acts Series;" in item 113.

**1951**—Act Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §2(a), 65 Stat. 710, added items 106a and 106b.

**1950**—Act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, §3, 64 Stat. 980, added item 112a.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 11, 2020

t0909

Order 

Clerk

September 11, 2020

160815

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160815

COA: 344788 

Wayne CC: 18-002872-AR

ANNE MARIE LAMBERT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Pagano (Docket No. 159981) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5597 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5597

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the ``Clara 
                     Luper Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2020

    Ms. Kendra S. Horn of Oklahoma (for herself, Mr. Kevin Hern of 
Oklahoma, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Lucas, and Mr. Cole) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the ``Clara 
                     Luper Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARA LUPER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 305 Northwest 5th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Clara Luper Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clara 
Luper Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Irwin M. Coane, Individually and as a Stockholder of American Distilling Company, Suing on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Stockholders of Said Corporation Similarly Situated Respondent, v. American Distilling Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 583.95

 583.62

 583.63

 582.89

 583.15

 583.52

 582.87

 582.41

 582.12

 582.63

 581.86

 581.78

 585.35

 585.00

 584.14

 585.09

 584.32

 583.17

 584.62

 581.65

 582.29

 582.70

 583.72

 584.11

 584.15

 581.51

 582.85

 582.94

 583.35

 584.68

 21,860

 21,659

 21,665

 21,217

 21,374

 21,599

 21,205

 20,931

 20,758

 21,062

 20,604

 20,557

 22,727

 22,507

 21,976

 22,564

 22,087

 21,386

 22,273

 20,481

 20,859

 21,104

 21,720

 21,958

 21,983

 20,399

 21,193

 21,247

 21,495

 22,310

STORAGE

-536

-201

+6

-448

+157

+225

-394

-274

-173

+304

-458

-47

+2,170

-220

-531

+588

-477

-701

+887

-1,792

+378

+245

+616

+238

+25

-1,584

+794

+54

+248

+815

CHANGE

5,058

5,157

5,114

4,990

5,193

5,273

5,212

5,422

5,345

5,805

5,139

5,363

6,418

5,331

5,056

5,754

5,228

5,067

5,907

4,570

5,664

5,495

5,800

5,568

5,455

4,590

5,853

5,564

5,664

5,930

INFLOW

 5,327

 5,256

 5,109

 5,214

 5,112

 5,159

 5,408

 5,558

 5,430

 4,951

 5,369

 5,386

 5,323

 5,442

 5,324

 5,457

 5,467

 5,418

 5,459

 5,472

 5,472

 5,371

 5,488

 5,448

 5,441

 5,388

 5,453

 5,537

 5,537

 5,519

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 700

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

FISHTRAP

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 2

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2000

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -86 161,985 161,295 700 0 33

ACRE-FEET -86 321,297 319,929 1,388 0 65

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 319,929

SPILL 1,388

 22,396

FISH TRAP 0

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 34

 0

 0

 0

 140

 250

 253

 257

 250

 260

 265

 257

 250

 256

 248

 2,720

 5,395

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 4,708

 5,033

 5,195

 4,971

 5,237

 5,387

 5,352

 5,458

 5,462

 5,754

 5,267

 5,667

 6,849

 5,586

 5,347

 5,848

 5,268

 5,093

 5,974

 4,532

 5,533

 5,366

 5,680

 5,560

 5,489

 4,467

 5,843

 5,441

 5,431

 5,755

 162,553

 322,424

Table 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,900.84

 1,900.84

 1,901.06

 1,901.13

 1,901.20

 1,901.24

 1,901.23

 1,901.04

 1,901.08

 1,900.91

 1,901.01

 1,901.23

 1,901.01

 1,901.13

 1,901.03

 1,901.02

 1,901.18

 1,901.37

 1,901.03

 1,901.06

 1,901.09

 1,901.56

 1,901.64

 1,901.82

 1,901.27

 1,901.56

 1,901.40

 1,901.50

 1,901.23

 1,901.04

 13,793

 13,793

 13,956

 14,008

 14,061

 14,091

 14,083

 13,941

 13,971

 13,845

 13,918

 14,083

 13,918

 14,008

 13,933

 13,926

 14,046

 14,188

 13,933

 13,956

 13,978

 14,330

 14,390

 14,524

 14,113

 14,330

 14,210

 14,285

 14,083

 13,941

STORAGE

-89

+0

+163

+52

+53

+30

-8

-142

+30

-126

+73

+165

-165

+90

-75

-7

+120

+142

-255

+23

+22

+352

+60

+134

-411

+217

-120

+75

-202

-142

CHANGE

260

1,269

1,145

963

643

947

932

231

934

930

1,033

841

727

964

265

1,858

1,180

1,181

953

936

312

479

850

1,354

1,298

1,614

1,445

1,855

1,757

1,432

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 25

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 348

 1,002

 1,240

 1,240

 1,240

 1,240

 1,240

 1,240

SPILL

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 180

 200

 180

 180

 180

 180

 180

 180

OUTLETS

 5

 5

 3

 2

 3

 1

 0

 3

 2

 0

 5

 4

 3

 1

 3

 4

 1

 5

 1

 3

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 4

 4

C.F.S.

 .21

 .22

 .13

 .11

 .12

 .06

 .01

 .14

 .07

 .00

 .23

 .20

 .13

 .14

 .14

 .20

 .12

 .14

 .03

 .14

 .03

 .10

 .13

 .16

 .21

 .21

 .23

 .29

 .20

 .17

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 22, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +59 30,588 2,400 5,860 9,235 93 4.27

ACRE-FEET +59 60,671 4,760 11,623 18,318 184

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,760

TOTAL RIVER 34,701 60,433

 13,882

 25,732

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 0

 964

 760

 635

 313

 631

 636

 0

 617

 689

 691

 454

 507

 618

 0

 1,558

 819

 804

 781

 621

 0

 0

 209

 0

 0

 0

 0

 311

 355

 0

 12,973

 25,732

Table 6
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omphalos, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 12, 2008, as amended by this Form
10-Q/A of the Company with the SEC on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(i)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




This
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




March
      9, 2009
                
                /s/
      Sheng-Peir
      YangSheng-Peir
      YangChief
      Executive Officer
This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflictbetween the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.         **Ku6 (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd.**           By:                    Title:                    March 21, 2009     Witness:              Name:         March 21, 2009 
 
2
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0592. CONFESOR CHAPARRO v. THE STATE.

In 2004, a jury found Confesor Chaparro guilty of four counts of aggravated

child molestation, and we affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. See Chaparro

v. State, 279 Ga. App. 145 (630 SE2d 645) (2006).1 Chaparro later filed a motion for

out-of-time appeal in the trial court, which was denied in 2012. Then, in 2020, he

filed another motion for out-of-time appeal. Chaparro filed this direct appeal fromthe

denial of that motion.

“An out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the remedy for a

frustrated right of appeal.” Kilgore v. State, 325 Ga. App. 874, 875 (1) (756 SE2d 9)

(2014) (punctuation omitted). Where, as here, a defendant has already had a direct

appeal, he is not entitled to an out-of-time appeal. See Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190,

191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002) (“[T]here is no right to directly appeal the denial of a

motion for out-of-time appeal filed by a criminal defendant whose conviction has

been affirmed on direct appeal.”).

1 Since his conviction, Chaparro hasfiled numerous other appealsin thisCourt.

See Case Nos. A08D0111 (Nov. 19, 2007); A08D0343 (May 2, 2008); A11A1862

(June 20, 2011); A14D0056 (Oct. 18, 2013); A17A2057 (July 21, 2017); A19D0224

(Dec.19, 2018); and A19A1643 (Apr. 10, 2019). 

December 13, 2021
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/13/2021
(No. 78-CC-0695

#### Jeff Brown, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed May 4, 1978.*

*290Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas u. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### Part D—Administration
### Part H—National Diffusion Network

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Part L of title IX of Pub. L. 103–227, which comprised this part, was designated part H of this subchapter for purposes of codification. Part L of title IX of Pub. L. 103–227 was formerly part B of title XIII of Pub. L. 89–10, which was classified to part B (§8651 et seq.) of subchapter XIII of chapter 70 of this title, prior to being redesignated as part L of title IX of Pub. L. 103–227 by Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1022(a), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1987, transferred to this part, and subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 107–279, title IV, §403(2), Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1985.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training.
    Date: June 28-29, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To Review and Evaluate Grant Applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Lynn M. Amende, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6116 Executive Blvd., 
Room 8105, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4759, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbdb1b9b2b8b9b09cb1bdb5b0f2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0818d858e84858ca08d81898cce8e8988ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 6, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-8713 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 582.72

 578.53

 580.94

 581.07

 580.90

 582.77

 584.91

 585.25

 585.08

 585.74

 585.35

 584.93

 583.63

 584.16

 583.76

 583.35

 583.73

 584.67

 584.13

 583.65

 581.72

 581.49

 582.76

 583.11

 583.64

 584.10

 583.70

 583.09

 582.09

 582.26

 21,116

 18,703

 20,065

 20,141

 20,042

 21,146

 22,451

 22,664

 22,557

 22,972

 22,727

 22,464

 21,665

 21,989

 21,744

 21,495

 21,726

 22,303

 21,970

 21,678

 20,522

 20,387

 21,140

 21,350

 21,671

 21,952

 21,708

 21,338

 20,740

 20,841

STORAGE

-586

-2,413

+1,362

+76

-99

+1,104

+1,305

+213

-107

+415

-245

-263

-799

+324

-245

-249

+231

+577

-333

-292

-1,156

-135

+753

+210

+321

+281

-244

-370

-598

+101

CHANGE

4,696

3,669

5,523

4,881

4,681

5,155

5,256

4,697

4,532

4,797

4,464

4,483

4,259

4,808

4,527

4,520

4,766

4,943

4,487

4,506

4,087

4,602

5,049

4,778

4,835

4,738

4,569

4,532

4,420

4,797

INFLOW

 4,906

 4,796

 4,749

 4,755

 4,643

 4,503

 4,509

 4,502

 4,497

 4,503

 4,503

 4,527

 4,574

 4,560

 4,563

 4,559

 4,562

 4,563

 4,563

 4,565

 4,582

 4,584

 4,582

 4,584

 4,584

 3,828

 4,604

 4,632

 4,635

 4,658

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 676

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 0

 5

 2

 3

 3

 10

 4

 3

 4

 0

 0

 4

 3

 0

 3

 2

 3

 4

 7

 3

 3

 1

 2

 3

 4

 7

 3

 2

 1

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2016

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -861 140,057 137,175 676 2,550 92

ACRE-FEET -861 277,803 272,087 1,341 5,058 182

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 272,087

SPILL 1,341

 21,702

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 28

 14

 19

 15

 15

 27

 18

 14

 893

 18

 1,124

 18

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 2,455

 4,869

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 4,584

 3,474

 5,461

 4,787

 4,678

 5,062

 5,124

 4,644

 3,622

 4,799

 3,401

 4,462

 4,229

 4,694

 4,492

 4,442

 4,760

 4,887

 4,468

 4,826

 4,025

 4,535

 4,982

 4,781

 4,818

 4,708

 4,569

 4,550

 4,381

 4,757

 137,002

 271,743