alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 407.14

 406.87

 406.60

 406.27

 405.95

 405.67

 405.39

 405.04

 404.69

 404.34

 404.07

 403.78

 403.41

 403.25

 403.01

 402.70

 402.33

 402.13

 401.94

 401.65

 401.43

 401.05

 400.59

 400.26

 399.91

 399.62

 399.31

 398.99

 398.62

 398.20

 428.9

 426.9

 425.0

 422.6

 420.3

 418.3

 416.4

 413.9

 411.4

 409.0

 407.1

 405.1

 402.5

 401.4

 399.8

 397.6

 395.1

 393.7

 392.4

 390.5

 389.0

 386.4

 383.4

 381.1

 378.8

 376.9

 374.9

 372.7

 370.3

 367.6

STORAGE

-1.7

-1.9

-1.9

-2.4

-2.3

-2.0

-2.0

-2.5

-2.5

-2.5

-1.9

-2.0

-2.6

-1.1

-1.7

-2.1

-2.5

-1.4

-1.3

-2.0

-1.5

-2.6

-3.1

-2.2

-2.3

-1.9

-2.0

-2.1

-2.4

-2.7

CHANGE

942

847

897

713

689

861

930

697

651

688

854

869

644

835

852

767

965

1,374

1,138

763

1,001

622

527

592

652

686

761

754

545

597

INFLOW

 1,486

 1,500

 1,532

 1,568

 1,517

 1,560

 1,616

 1,630

 1,569

 1,627

 1,546

 1,612

 1,660

 1,113

 1,427

 1,546

 1,981

 1,774

 1,541

 1,487

 1,490

 1,655

 1,800

 1,438

 1,607

 1,446

 1,579

 1,600

 1,527

 1,662

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 255

 265

 277

 278

 268

 247

 254

 264

 262

 244

 230

 231

 233

 238

 236

 237

 209

 242

 227

 218

 229

 230

 235

 218

 180

 180

 183

 188

 206

 215

PUMPING

 41

 63

 63

 58

 58

 53

 60

 52

 57

 52

 31

 40

 42

 42

 26

 53

 51

 48

 23

 46

 32

 32

 43

 47

 40

 25

 31

 31

 31

 103

C.F.S.

 .17

 .26

 .26

 .24

 .24

 .22

 .25

 .22

 .24

 .22

 .13

 .17

 .18

 .18

 .11

 .23

 .22

 .21

 .10

 .20

 .14

 .14

 .19

 .21

 .18

 .11

 .14

 .14

 .14

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -63.1 23,713 47,096 0 0 6,979 1,374 5.91 .44

ACRE-FEET -63,100 47,035 93,415 0 0 13,843 2,725

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 93,415

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 13,843

TOTAL 107,258

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = .44

 430.5

OUTLET 0 .44

Table 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,451.37

 3,451.36

 3,451.25

 3,451.19

 3,451.19

 3,451.19

 3,451.36

 3,451.36

 3,451.31

 3,451.38

 3,451.51

 3,451.52

 3,451.62

 3,451.82

 3,451.86

 3,451.86

 3,451.92

 3,451.92

 3,451.92

 3,451.92

 3,451.98

 3,452.05

 3,452.11

 3,452.19

 3,452.61

 3,452.91

 3,452.97

 3,453.03

 3,453.10

 3,453.23

 3,453.35

 29,399

 29,393

 29,334

 29,302

 29,302

 29,302

 29,393

 29,393

 29,366

 29,404

 29,474

 29,479

 29,533

 29,640

 29,662

 29,662

 29,694

 29,694

 29,694

 29,694

 29,726

 29,764

 29,797

 29,840

 30,068

 30,231

 30,264

 30,296

 30,335

 30,406

 30,472

STORAGE

-32

-6

-59

-32

+0

+0

+91

+0

-27

+38

+70

+5

+54

+107

+22

+0

+32

+0

+0

+0

+32

+38

+33

+43

+228

+163

+33

+32

+39

+71

+66

CHANGE

-1.5

11.0

-7.5

9.1

20.0

22.0

67.6

23.0

11.4

40.5

56.3

20.5

49.2

74.9

33.1

23.0

31.1

14.0

15.3

14.2

31.4

34.2

33.8

35.7

130.0

98.2

29.6

32.1

36.7

53.8

48.3

INFLOW

 13

 13

 21

 24

 19

 21

 20

 22

 24

 20

 20

 17

 21

 20

 21

 22

 14

 13

 14

 13

 14

 14

 16

 13

 13

 15

 12

 15

 16

 17

 14

CONDUIT

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

 .0

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 0.6

 0.0

 0.2

 0.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.7

 0.0

 0.0

 0.3

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.3

 0.2

 0.3

 0.0

 0.2

 0.0

 1.1

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

C.F.S.

 .033

 .000

 .012

 .010

 .000

 .000

 .040

 .000

 .000

 .020

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .015

 .009

 .018

 .000

 .010

 .000

 .060

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

INCHES

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .37

 2.01

 .04

 .00

 1.32

 1.67

 .01

 1.21

 1.03

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .71

 .00

 .00

 .49

 1.81

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .62

 .04

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/06/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,041 1,091.0 531 31.0 0.0 4.1 .227 12.93

ACRE-FEET +1,041 2,164.0 1,053 61.5 0.0 8.1

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 1,053.2

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 644.6

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 16.62

 29,431

 408.6 12.93

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 5

 45

 13

 8

 12

 10

 9

 24

 32

 14

 11

 95

 7

 6

 9

 27

 17

 13

 22

 82

 32

 22

 16

 19

 19

 18

 593

 1,176

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
#### Alvin R. Harris, Executor, et al. *v.*George Novotasky

*Snow G. Munford,*in support of the motion.

*Harvey A. Katz,*in opposition.

Submitted October 6

decided October 6, 1970

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the plaintiffs’ request for a finding and draft finding in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, James G. Clark, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Education Lending Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date: October 23, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James G. Clark
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 823

 820

 818

 837

 840

 836

 864

 804

 760

 742

 748

 769

 760

 766

 745

 762

 757

 763

 746

 746

 716

 725

 660

 671

 674

 692

 733

 792

 798

 810

 695

 685

 672

 659

 658

 651

 647

 633

 609

 620

 629

 639

 638

 633

 617

 619

 617

 615

 605

 599

 605

 579

 577

 570

 581

 542

 603

 592

 568

 595

 758

 752

 745

 754

 744

 734

 740

 713

 688

 683

 684

 691

 694

 694

 674

 684

 691

 678

 669

 681

 664

 648

 625

 615

 623

 627

 652

 667

 652

 690

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 477

 482

 473

 469

 475

 483

 488

 480

 478

 486

 487

 503

 517

 506

 510

 524

 531

 546

 551

 556

 565

 582

 593

 619

 648

 630

 628

 629

 640

 635

 675

 452

 452

 461

 463

 465

 467

 470

 467

 465

 470

 472

 472

 473

 477

 487

 484

 486

 494

 500

 495

 519

 526

 532

 541

 548

 554

 564

 557

 568

 573

 575

 468

 468

 467

 466

 470

 473

 474

 473

 474

 476

 478

 483

 491

 494

 497

 501

 507

 516

 523

 528

 540

 551

 557

 572

 584

 585

 589

 591

 599

 602

 615

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
**Exhibit10.10**

**TRADEMARKLICENSE EXTENSION AGREEMENT**

This ExtensionAgreement dated as of August 1, 2007 is by and between Hallmark Licensing, Inc.(“Hallmark Licensing”) and Crown Media United States, LLC (“Crown US”).

WHEREAS, Crown USand Hallmark Licensing have previously entered into that certain Movie ChannelTrademark License Agreement between the parties dated as of January 1, 2004, asextended as of August 1, 2004, as of August 1, 2005 and as of April 10, 2006(the “License Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, theparties desire to further extend the term of the License Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE,Crown US and Hallmark Licensing hereby agree as follows:

The term of the License Agreement shall be extendedfor an additional period terminating on September 1, 2008, subject to anyearlier termination pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.

All other terms and conditions of the LicenseAgreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension Agreement as of thedate set forth above.
| HALLMARK LICENSING, INC.        |                    |   |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                            |                    |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
| By:                             | /s/ Deanne Stedem       |   |   |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
| Title:                          | Vice President          |   |   |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
| CROWN MEDIA UNITED  STATES, LLC |                    |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
| By:                             | /s/ Charles L. Stanford |   |   |   |   |
|                            |                    |   |   |
| Title:                          | Vice President          |   |   |   |   |
|                                 |                         |        |        |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
### Part G—Evaluations

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8001(a), (b)(1), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089, redesignated part F (§7941) of subchapter IX of this chapter as part G of this subchapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 166

 166

 171

 174

 168

 164

 161

 157

 159

 161

 164

 165

 171

 171

 173

 179

 177

 171

 164

 158

 157

 166

 175

 191

 188

 205

 230

 300

 348

 362

 161

 159

 157

 154

 154

 151

 147

 145

 144

 144

 142

 143

 144

 142

 143

 142

 141

 141

 140

 141

 141

 141

 142

 145

 147

 147

 150

 156

 159

 159

 163

 162

 162

 163

 160

 157

 152

 149

 148

 149

 149

 150

 151

 151

 150

 151

 151

 151

 149

 148

 148

 148

 151

 156

 158

 163

 174

 193

 205

 212

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,376

 2,365

 2,352

 2,339

 2,325

 2,309

 2,290

 2,270

 2,249

 2,230

 2,211

 2,194

 2,179

 2,166

 2,153

 2,142

 2,131

 2,119

 2,108

 2,099

 2,095

 2,094

 2,097

 2,104

 2,113

 2,126

 2,149

 2,191

 2,246

 2,307

 170

 169

 168

 167

 166

 165

 164

 162

 161

 159

 158

 157

 156

 155

 154

 153

 152

 151

 151

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 151

 152

 154

 157

 160

 165

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Stephenson Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Isaac Hotaling and Others, Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
From:	Rick Leiby [rleiby@dekabatteries.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 30, 2013 4:21 PM
To:	Page, Steve
Cc:	Tsirigotis, Peter; French, Chuck; Topham, Nathan; 'Rick Leiby'; 'Troy Greiss 
(trgreiss@dekabatteries.com)'; ''Scott Hauser' 
(shauser@dekabatteries.com)'; ''Eric Peffel' (epeffel@dekabatteries.com)'; 
''Ron Harding' (rharding@ALL4INC.COM)'; ''Roy Rakiewicz' 
(rrakiewicz@ALL4INC.COM)'; 'Steinwurtzel, Robert N.'; 'DeLaquil, Mark'
Subject:	Follow up to OAQPS Alternative standards petition
Attachments:	EAST PENN - OAQPS follow up letter.doc

Dear Mr. Page:
Attached please find a letter regarding East Penn's Alternative Standards 
Petition.
Best regards,

R. A. Leiby, Jr.
Vice President, Metals Operations
East Penn mfg. co., inc.
610-682-6361
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,900.60

 1,900.71

 1,901.50

 1,901.74

 1,901.56

 1,901.18

 1,901.30

 1,901.16

 1,901.37

 1,901.48

 1,901.24

 1,901.46

 1,901.48

 1,901.33

 1,901.34

 1,901.39

 1,900.92

 1,901.40

 1,901.93

 1,900.97

 1,901.33

 1,901.23

 1,901.09

 1,901.04

 1,901.17

 1,901.20

 1,901.18

 1,901.40

 1,901.17

 1,901.20

 1,901.15

 13,617

 13,698

 14,285

 14,465

 14,330

 14,046

 14,135

 14,031

 14,188

 14,270

 14,091

 14,255

 14,270

 14,158

 14,165

 14,203

 13,852

 14,210

 14,607

 13,889

 14,158

 14,083

 13,978

 13,941

 14,038

 14,061

 14,046

 14,210

 14,038

 14,061

 14,023

STORAGE

-206

+81

+587

+180

-135

-284

+89

-104

+157

+82

-179

+164

+15

-112

+7

+38

-351

+358

+397

-718

+269

-75

-105

-37

+97

+23

-15

+164

-172

+23

-38

CHANGE

3,383

3,483

3,733

3,556

1,462

1,287

1,475

1,396

1,494

1,437

1,471

2,600

2,484

2,457

2,456

2,426

2,214

2,450

2,534

-60

450

278

263

297

364

328

308

399

229

328

297

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 76

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 205

 180

 180

 180

 180

 184

 186

 190

 190

 190

 190

 190

 190

 190

 190

 190

SPILL

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 34

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

OUTLETS

 4

 4

 4

 2

 3

 4

 4

 3

 4

 3

 5

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .17

 .19

 .12

 .10

 .15

 .17

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .17

 .21

 .14

 .14

 .13

 .11

 .13

 .12

 .12

 .19

 .11

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .09

 .04

 .09

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .07

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +200 47,279 2,476 1,294 7,805 87 3.93

ACRE-FEET +200 93,778 4,911 2,567 15,481 173

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,911

TOTAL RIVER 22,959 93,401

 13,823

 70,442

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 3,033

 2,988

 2,983

 3,013

 1,077

 976

 976

 995

 961

 943

 1,106

 2,064

 2,023

 2,060

 2,000

 2,079

 2,088

 1,967

 2,030

 0

 12

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 35,514

 70,442

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,901.13

 1,900.85

 1,900.39

 1,901.15

 1,902.02

 1,901.02

 1,901.07

 1,901.09

 1,900.92

 1,900.92

 1,900.88

 1,900.90

 1,900.97

 1,901.02

 1,900.91

 1,900.82

 1,900.96

 1,900.93

 1,901.20

 1,901.38

 1,901.18

 1,900.99

 1,900.98

 1,900.95

 1,900.87

 1,900.89

 1,900.90

 1,900.96

 14,008

 13,801

 13,462

 14,023

 14,674

 13,926

 13,963

 13,978

 13,852

 13,852

 13,823

 13,837

 13,889

 13,926

 13,845

 13,779

 13,882

 13,859

 14,061

 14,195

 14,046

 13,904

 13,896

 13,874

 13,815

 13,830

 13,837

 13,882

STORAGE

-314

-207

-339

+561

+651

-748

+37

+15

-126

+0

-29

+14

+52

+37

-81

-66

+103

-23

+202

+134

-149

-142

-8

-22

-59

+15

+7

+45

CHANGE

145

774

187

583

629

-76

320

308

236

302

286

307

328

334

274

282

367

303

416

382

239

243

312

304

285

323

320

339

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 27

 0

 33

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 273

 300

 267

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

OUTLETS

 3

 0

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 2

 1

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .16

 .00

 .07

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .04

 .02

 .08

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .08

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 21, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -440 9,052 2,060 6,340 0 28 1.32

ACRE-FEET -440 17,955 4,086 12,575 0 56

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,086

TOTAL RIVER 16,661 18,335

 14,322

 1,674

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 0

 578

 56

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 844

 1,674
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 248

 243

 233

 234

 227

 227

 224

 219

 221

 217

 216

 217

 218

 216

 213

 216

 233

 230

 236

 241

 266

 259

 293

 335

 354

 306

 312

 278

 270

 281

 299

 231

 224

 220

 216

 212

 207

 203

 201

 199

 201

 199

 201

 199

 200

 201

 200

 201

 201

 203

 205

 205

 207

 213

 216

 221

 222

 220

 220

 215

 218

 219

 240

 233

 227

 222

 219

 214

 211

 207

 206

 207

 207

 208

 208

 207

 206

 206

 209

 209

 212

 215

 220

 224

 235

 245

 254

 246

 250

 236

 232

 236

 241

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,405

 3,353

 3,312

 3,274

 3,247

 3,223

 3,200

 3,175

 3,149

 3,129

 3,100

 3,082

 3,054

 3,016

 2,982

 2,955

 2,937

 2,924

 2,917

 2,918

 2,927

 2,944

 2,973

 3,011

 3,058

 3,096

 3,138

 3,167

 3,193

 3,223

 3,255

 243

 240

 237

 234

 232

 230

 229

 227

 225

 224

 221

 220

 218

 215

 213

 211

 210

 209

 208

 208

 209

 210

 212

 215

 218

 221

 224

 226

 228

 230

 233

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 685.308 Remedial actions. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary may require the repayment of funds and the purchase of loans by the school if the Secretary determines that the school is liable as a result of— ( 1 ) The school's violation of a Federal statute or regulation;
( 2 ) The school's negligent or willful false certification under § 685.215; or
( 3 ) The school's actions that gave rise to a successful claim for which the Secretary discharged a loan, in whole or in part, pursuant to §§ 685.206, 685.214, 685.216, 685.222, or subpart D of this part.
( b ) In requiring a school to repay funds to the Secretary or to purchase loans from the Secretary in connection with an audit or program review, the Secretary follows the procedures described in 34 CFR part 668, subpart H.
( c ) The Secretary may impose a fine or take an emergency action against a school or limit, suspend, or terminate a school's participation in the Direct Loan Program in accordance with 34 CFR part 668, subpart G.
[59 FR 61690, Dec. 1, 1994, as amended at 81 FR 76089, Nov. 1, 2016; 84 FR 49933, Sept. 23, 2019; 87 FR 66068, Nov. 1, 2022]