20312 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Notices 

1New World Pasta Company, American Italian 

Pasta Company, and Dakota Growers Pasta 

Company (collectively, petitioners). 

impacts of the proposal. If accepted, the 

document will be adopted as the 

environmental assessment (EA) for the 

proposal. RUS’s EA would be available 

for review and comment for 45 days. 

Should RUS determine, based on the EA 

for the proposal, that impacts associated 

with the construction and operation of 

the proposal would not have a 

significant environmental impact, it will 

prepare a finding of no significant 

impact (FONSI). Public notification of a 

FONSI would be published in the 

Federal Register and in newspapers 

with circulation in the proposal area. 

If at any point in the preparation of an 

EA, RUS determines that the proposed 

action will have a significant effect on 

the quality of the human environment, 

the preparation of an Environmental 

Impact Statement will be required. Any 

final action by RUS related to the 

proposed action will be subject to, and 

contingent upon, compliance with all 

relevant Federal, State, and local 

environmental laws and regulations and 

completion of the environmental review 

requirements as prescribed in RUS’s 

Environmental Policies and Procedures. 

Dated: April 5, 2011. 

Mark S. Plank, 

Director, Engineering and Environmental, 

Staff, Rural Utilities Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8719 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–403–801, C–403–802] 

Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon 

From Norway: Extension of Time 

Limits for Preliminary and Final 

Results of Full Third Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 12, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson for (CVD) at 202–482– 

4793 and Eric Greynolds for (AD) at 

202–482–6071, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. 

Background 

On January 3, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the third sunset reviews of the 

antidumping (AD) and countervailing 

duty (CVD) orders on fresh and chilled 

Atlantic salmon from Norway, pursuant 

to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). See 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review, 76 FR 89 (January 3, 2011). 

Within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department 

received a notice of intent to participate, 

in both the AD and CVD sunset reviews, 

on behalf of Phoenix Salmon U.S., Inc. 

(Phoenix Salmon), a domestic interested 

party. Phoenix Salmon claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act, as a producer of 

subject merchandise. 

The Department received timely 

substantive responses from Phoenix 

Salmon and the following respondent 

interested parties: the Government of 

Norway, Norwegian Seafood Federation 

(NSF), and the Aquaculture Division of 

the Norwegian Seafood Association 

(ADNSA). The domestic and respondent 

interested parties also submitted to the 

Department timely rebuttal comments. 

On April 6, 2011, after analyzing the 

submissions from the interested parties 

and finding that NSF and ADNSA have 

standing as foreign interested parties 

and that the substantive responses 

submitted by all of the interested parties 

are adequate, the Department 

determined to conduct full sunset 

reviews of the AD and CVD orders on 

fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from 

Norway. See Memorandum to Gary 

Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, from 

Melissa Skinner, Director, Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

Office 3, regarding ‘‘Adequacy 

Determination: Third Sunset Reviews of 

the Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders on Fresh and Chilled 

Atlantic Salmon From Norway,’’ (April 

6, 2011). 

Extension of Time Limits 

In accordance with section 

751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department 

may extend the period of time for 

making its determination by not more 

than 90 days, if it determines that the 

review is extraordinarily complicated. 

We determine that the AD and CVD 

sunset reviews are extraordinarily 

complicated, pursuant to section 

751(c)(5)(C) of the Act, because of a 

large number of complex issues in each 

review that the Department must 

analyze. 

The preliminary results of the full 

sunset reviews of the AD and CVD 

orders on fresh and chilled Atlantic 

salmon from Norway are scheduled for 

April 23, 2011, and the final results of 

these reviews are scheduled for August 

31, 2011. The Department is extending 

the deadlines for both the preliminary 

and final results of the full sunset 

reviews. 

As a result, the Department intends to 

issue the preliminary results of the full 

sunset reviews of the AD and CVD 

orders on fresh and chilled Atlantic 

salmon from Norway on July 22, 2011, 

and the final results of the reviews on 

November 29, 2011. These dates are 90 

days from the original scheduled dates 

of the preliminary and final results of 

these full sunset reviews. 

This notice is issued in accordance 

with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C)(v) of 

the Act. 

Dated: April 6, 2011. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8735 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–805] 

Certain Pasta From Turkey: Extension 

of Time Limit for the Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; (202) 482–3692. 

Background 

On July 24, 1996, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on certain pasta 

from Turkey. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order and Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta From 

Turkey, 61 FR 38545 (July 24, 1996). On 

July 1, 2010, we published in the 

Federal Register the notice of 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ of this order for the period July 

1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 38074 

(July 1, 2010). On July 30, 2010, we 

received a request from petitioners 1 to 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Notices 20313 

review Marsan Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret 

A.S. (Marsan), in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(b)(1). On August 31, 2010, 

we published the notice of initiation of 

review of Marsan. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Deferral of 

Initiation of Administrative Review, 75 

FR 53274 (August 31, 2010). The 

preliminary results of review are 

currently due April 4, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), 

requires that the Department make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act further states that, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period specified, the 

administering the authority may extend 

the 245-day period to issue its 

preliminary results to up to 365 days. 

We determine that completion of the 

preliminary results of this review within 

the 245-day period is not practicable for 

the following reasons. The Department 

needs additional time to analyze 

complex issues regarding affiliation and 

knowledge of U.S. destination. Given 

the complexity of these issues, and in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 30 days. 

Therefore, the preliminary results are 

now due no later than May 4, 2011. The 

final results continue to be due 120 days 

after publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: April 4, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8566 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–834] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From 

Mexico: Notice of Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

petitioner Aqualon Company, a unit of 

Hercules Incorporated (Aqualon), the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from 

Mexico. The review covers exports of 

the subject merchandise to the United 

States produced and exported by 

Quimica Amtex S.A. de C.V. (Amtex); 

the period of review (POR) is July 1, 

2009, through June 30, 2010. 

We preliminarily find that Amtex has 

made sales at less than normal value 

(NV) during the POR. If these 

preliminary results are adopted in our 

final results of this review, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 

duties based on differences between the 

export price (EP) or constructed export 

price (CEP) and NV. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

Parties who submit arguments in this 

proceeding are requested to submit with 

the arguments: (1) A statement of the 

issues, (2) a brief summary of the 

arguments, and (3) a table of authorities. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 12, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

antidumping duty order on CMC from 

Mexico on July 11, 2005. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Mexico, the Netherlands, and Sweden, 

70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). On July 1, 

2010, the Department published the 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of CMC from 

Mexico for the period of July 1, 2009, 

through June 30, 2010. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation: Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 38074 

(July 1, 2010). On July 26, 2010, 

petitioner Aqualon requested an 

administrative review of Amtex. On 

August 31, 2010, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of this antidumping 

duty administrative review. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274 

(August 31, 2010). 

On September 21, 2010, the 

Department issued its standard 

antidumping duty questionnaire to 

Amtex. Amtex submitted its response to 

section A of the Department’s 

questionnaire on October 15, 2010 

(Amtex Section A Response). Amtex 

submitted corrections to its section A 

response on October 18, 2010. Amtex 

submitted its response to sections B and 

C of the Department’s questionnaire on 

November 29, 2010 (Amtex Sections B 

and C Response). On March 7, 2011, the 

Department issued a supplemental 

section A, B, and C questionnaire to 

Amtex. Amtex timely submitted its 

response to the Department’s 

supplemental section A, B, and C 

questionnaire on March 14, 2011 

(Amtex Supplemental Response). 

Period of Review 

The POR is July 1, 2009, through June 

30, 2010. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is all purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 

sometimes also referred to as purified 

sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or 

cellulose gum, which is a white to offwhite, non-toxic, odorless, 

biodegradable powder, comprising 

sodium CMC that has been refined and 

purified to a minimum assay of 90 

percent. Purified CMC does not include 

unpurified or crude CMC, CMC 

Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and 

CMC that is cross-linked through heat 

treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that 

has undergone one or more purification 

operations which, at a minimum, reduce 

the remaining salt and other by-product 

portion of the product to less than ten 

percent. The merchandise subject to this 

order is classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States at 

subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff 

classification is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Date of Sale 

The Department’s regulations state 

that it will normally use the date of 

invoice, as recorded in the exporter’s or 

producer’s records kept in the ordinary 

course of business, as the date of sale. 

See 19 CFR 351.401(i). However, if the 

Department is satisfied that ‘‘a different 

date * * * better reflects the date on 

which the exporter or producer 

establishes the material terms of sale,’’ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES