alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.614 Inventory reserve records. ( a ) *General.* For each eligible distilled spirits product to be tax determined in accordance with § 19.250, the proprietor must establish an inventory reserve account, in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Deposit records.* For each batch of the bottled or packaged product, the proprietor must enter into the inventory reserve account a deposit record, which may be combined with the bottling and packaging record required by § 19.599, showing: ( 1 ) The name of the product;
( 2 ) The bottling and packaging record serial number;
( 3 ) The date the bottling or packaging was completed;
( 4 ) The total proof gallons bottled and packaged; and
( 5 ) The effective tax rate of the product computed in accordance with § 19.246.
( c ) *Depletions.* The inventory reserve account for each product must be depleted in the same order in which the deposit records were entered into the account. The proprietor must record a depletion for each disposition (for example, a taxable removal, an exportation, or an inventory shortage or breakage) by entering on the deposit record: ( 1 ) The transaction date;
( 2 ) The transaction record serial number;
( 3 ) The proof gallons disposed of; and
( 4 ) The proof gallons remaining. If any depletion exceeds the quantity of product remaining on the deposit record, the proprietor must deplete the remaining quantity, close the deposit record, and then deplete the remainder of the transaction from the next deposit record.
(26 U.S.C. 5207)
EXHIBIT
32
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company .
 
 /s/
      Kenneth BosketKenneth
      BosketCEODated:
      August 7, 2009
  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
  
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Crown Equity
..
 
 /s/
      Montse ZamanMontse
      ZamanCFODated:
      August 7, 2009
  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Crown Equity for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 303.346 Responsibility and accountability.

Each public agency or EIS provider who has a direct role in the provision of early intervention services is responsible for making a good faith effort to assist each eligible child in achieving the outcomes in the child's IFSP. However, part C of the Act does not require that any public agency or EIS provider be held accountable if an eligible child does not achieve the growth projected in the child's IFSP.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1436)
### Part B—Local Educational Agencies
### §33. Destruction of motor vehicles or motor vehicle facilities

(a) Whoever willfully, with intent to endanger the safety of any person on board or anyone who he believes will board the same, or with a reckless disregard for the safety of human life, damages, disables, destroys, tampers with, or places or causes to be placed any explosive or other destructive substance in, upon, or in proximity to, any motor vehicle which is used, operated, or employed in interstate or foreign commerce, or its cargo or material used or intended to be used in connection with its operation; or

Whoever willfully, with like intent, damages, disables, destroys, sets fire to, tampers with, or places or causes to be placed any explosive or other destructive substance in, upon, or in proximity to any garage, terminal, structure, supply, or facility used in the operation of, or in support of the operation of, motor vehicles engaged in interstate or foreign commerce or otherwise makes or causes such property to be made unworkable, unusable, or hazardous to work or use; or

Whoever, with like intent, willfully disables or incapacitates any driver or person employed in connection with the operation or maintenance of the motor vehicle, or in any way lessens the ability of such person to perform his duties as such; or

Whoever willfully attempts or conspires to do any of the aforesaid acts—

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) Whoever is convicted of a violation of subsection (a) involving a motor vehicle that, at the time the violation occurred, carried high-level radioactive waste (as that term is defined in section 2(12) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101(12))) or spent nuclear fuel (as that term is defined in section 2(23) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101(23))), shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for any term of years not less than 30, or for life.

(Added July 14, 1956, ch. 595, §1, 70 Stat. 540; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–88, title IV, §402(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 955; Pub. L. 109–177, title IV, §406(c)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 245.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–177 inserted "or conspires" before "to do any of the aforesaid acts" in fourth par.

1995—Pub. L. 104–88 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1995 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
###### Editorial Note on Part 44

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 44 appear by T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43480, Aug. 20, 2001, and T.D. ATF-480, 67 FR 30801-30803, May 8, 2002.

#### § 44.228 Landing certificate.

Each claimant for drawback under this subpart agrees in the bond filed by him that he will furnish, within a reasonable time, evidence satisfactory to the appropriate TTB officer that the tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes covered by his claim have been landed at some port beyond the jurisdiction of the internal revenue laws of the United States, or that after shipment from the United States the articles were lost, and have not been relanded within the limits of the United States. The landing certificate shall accurately describe the articles involved, so as to readily identify the drawback claim to which it relates. The landing certificate shall be signed by a revenue officer at the place of destination, unless it is shown that no such officer can furnish such landing certificate, in which case the certificate of landing shall be signed by the consignee, or by the vessel's agent at the place of landing, and shall be sworn to before a notary public or other officer authorized to administer oaths and having an official seal. The landing certificate shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer, with whom the drawback claim was filed, within 6 months from the date of clearance of the tobacco products, and cigarette papers and tubes from the United States. A landing certificate prepared in a foreign language shall be accompanied by an accurate translation thereof in English.

(72 Stat. 1419; 26 U.S.C. 5706)

[T.D. 6871, 31 FR 56, Jan. 4, 1966. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-232, 51 FR 28089, Aug. 5, 1986; T.D. ATF-243, 51 FR 43194, Dec. 1, 1986]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 203

 223

 225

 198

 197

 194

 188

 181

 173

 169

 166

 164

 162

 160

 158

 153

 152

 147

 144

 142

 143

 143

 138

 137

 139

 140

 148

 146

 144

 142

 193

 194

 190

 189

 183

 171

 174

 168

 162

 155

 148

 146

 142

 147

 145

 140

 139

 135

 132

 133

 129

 129

 130

 127

 129

 133

 134

 129

 129

 128

 198

 201

 201

 194

 191

 184

 180

 175

 169

 164

 161

 158

 155

 154

 152

 149

 145

 141

 138

 139

 138

 137

 135

 134

 135

 135

 138

 139

 138

 136

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.34

 1,198.34

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.30

 1,198.29

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 48.57

 48.55

 48.53

 48.50

 48.50

 48.50

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.44

 48.44

 48.44

 48.43

 48.41

 48.37

 48.37

 48.39

 48.39

 48.39

 48.39

 48.36

 48.34

 48.34

 48.36

 48.36

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

86

95

89

68

84

84

69

78

78

76

63

73

73

73

72

63

68

68

55

49

26

51

62

53

55

49

23

28

38

54

39

INFLOW

 108

 100

 93

 79

 79

 79

 72

 72

 72

 72

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 60

 60

 60

 54

 48

 38

 38

 43

 43

 43

 43

 33

 29

 29

 33

 33

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 4

 3

 4

 6

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 3

 5

 6

 6

 6

 5

 11

 7

 7

 9

 9

 5

 12

 9

 9

 11

 5

 7

 7

 8

 11

 5

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .07

 .10

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .09

 .19

 .13

 .12

 .16

 .15

 .08

 .21

 .16

 .15

 .19

 .08

 .13

 .13

 .14

 .19

 .09

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/02/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.29 1,942 31 1,843 203 3.52 .01

ACRE-FEET -290 3,852 61 3,656 403

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 3,656

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 3,717

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2006 6.84

 48.62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.26

 1,900.52

 1,901.08

 1,901.28

 1,901.42

 1,901.14

 1,900.98

 1,901.16

 1,901.44

 1,901.26

 1,901.26

 1,900.92

 1,901.30

 1,900.95

 1,900.72

 1,901.08

 1,901.43

 1,900.48

 1,901.52

 1,900.61

 1,901.16

 1,901.27

 1,901.59

 1,900.72

 1,901.53

 1,900.76

 1,901.24

 1,901.46

 1,901.25

 1,901.59

 1,900.82

 14,105

 13,558

 13,971

 14,120

 14,225

 14,016

 13,896

 14,031

 14,240

 14,105

 14,105

 13,852

 14,135

 13,874

 13,705

 13,971

 14,233

 13,528

 14,300

 13,624

 14,031

 14,113

 14,352

 13,705

 14,307

 13,734

 14,091

 14,255

 14,098

 14,352

 13,779

STORAGE

+149

-547

+413

+149

+105

-209

-120

+135

+209

-135

+0

-253

+283

-261

-169

+266

+262

-705

+772

-676

+407

+82

+239

-647

+602

-573

+357

+164

-157

+254

-573

CHANGE

892

420

1,226

943

506

795

394

1,321

558

383

451

324

595

318

297

450

434

-53

690

-39

507

344

422

-24

606

11

481

384

222

429

12

INFLOW

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

POWER

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 68

 55

 55

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 170

 165

 165

 165

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

 220

OUTLETS

 4

 4

 0

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 3

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .16

 .20

 .16

 .17

 .15

 .18

 .17

 .17

 .14

 .03

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .10

 .10

 .05

 .09

 .06

 .13

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .05

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 29, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -177 14,299 2,480 5,955 2,978 63 2.97

ACRE-FEET -177 28,362 4,919 11,812 5,907 125

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES THE CONTINUOUS FISH RELEASE OF 75 C.F.S.

(2) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM PAN AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 4,919

TOTAL RIVER 22,638 28,416

 13,956

 5,778

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 363

 242

 568

 414

 0

 446

 0

 799

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 67

 14

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,913

 5,778

Table 6
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Debra Huett v. Paul Cheng

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00680

- CV

Trial court case number: 1009881

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4 of Harri s County , Texas

On July 18, 2012 , appellant Debra Huett filed an affidavit of indigence for costs of appeal

in the trial court along with her notice of appeal. The county clerk timely filed a contest to the affidavit of indigence on July 24, 2012, and th e trial court timely signed an order that same day extending the time to conduct the hearing on the contest by twenty days

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(e) , (i)

. On July 30, 2012, the trial court timely signed an order sustaining the contest to the

affidavit of indigence. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i). Appellant was required to file a motion challenging the trial court’s order within ten days after the order was signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(j). Appellant did not file a motion challenging the order susta ining the contest within ten days of July 30, 2012.

Appellant is ORDERED to pay the filing fee of $175.00 to this Court no later than 10 days from the date of this order , or the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees i n civil cases unless indigent); see also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (Vernon 200 5), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011 ) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals

a nd Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX

. R. A PP

. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals); see also

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case ).

Appellant is ORDERED to file within 30 days of the date of this order proof thatappellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record or this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 7, 2012
#### In the Matter of Joseph Latona, Appellant, against Thomas J. McMahon, as Commissioner of Police of the City of Buffalo, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The order denies a motion by petitioner for a peremptory mandamus order for destruction of fingerprints and photographs.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear by T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39094-39096, July 27, 2001; T.D. ATF-464, 66 FR 43479, Aug. 20, 2001; and T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5479, Feb. 1, 2011.

#### § 40.496 Trade name certificate.

Every person that files an application for a permit as a manufacturer of processed tobacco operating under a trade name must furnish with the application for the permit required by § 40.492 a true copy of the certificate or other document, if any, issued by a State, county, or municipal authority in connection with the transaction of business under such trade name. If no such certificate or other document is so required, a written statement, in duplicate, to that effect by such person will be sufficient for the purpose of this section.

[T.D. TTB-78, 74 FR 29410, June 22, 2009, as amended by T.D. TTB-80, 74 FR 37552, July 29, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 504.20

 503.79

 503.22

 502.53

 502.13

 501.61

 501.12

 500.95

 500.32

 499.55

 498.59

 497.80

 496.97

 496.16

 495.27

 494.25

 493.39

 492.56

 491.87

 491.18

 490.58

 490.00

 489.60

 489.23

 488.94

 488.80

 488.76

 488.83

 488.89

 488.86

 228.2

 227.0

 225.2

 223.2

 222.0

 220.4

 219.0

 218.4

 216.6

 214.3

 211.5

 209.2

 206.8

 204.5

 202.0

 199.1

 196.7

 194.4

 192.5

 190.7

 189.0

 187.5

 186.4

 185.4

 184.6

 184.2

 184.1

 184.3

 184.5

 184.4

STORAGE

-0.9

-1.2

-1.7

-2.1

-1.2

-1.6

-1.5

-0.5

-1.9

-2.3

-2.8

-2.3

-2.4

-2.3

-2.5

-2.9

-2.4

-2.3

-1.9

-1.9

-1.6

-1.6

-1.1

-1.0

-0.8

-0.4

-0.1

+0.2

+0.2

-0.1

CHANGE

980

714

553

476

930

739

789

1,295

635

426

123

360

312

345

286

123

356

371

414

338

461

367

545

502

476

469

414

500

490

372

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

MADERA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 84

 0

 91

 197

 196

 195

 194

 226

 248

 246

 210

 185

 183

 181

 221

 247

 244

 200

 168

 166

 164

 162

 161

 145

 159

 142

 142

 142

 142

 142

FRIANT-KERN

 34

 44

 33

 29

 45

 28

 31

 26

 27

 27

 31

 34

 36

 30

 34

 24

 27

 27

 17

 26

 23

 17

 24

 15

 23

 31

 11

 17

 16

 18

C.F.S.

 .35

 .45

 .34

 .30

 .47

 .29

 .32

 .27

 .28

 .28

 .33

 .36

 .39

 .33

 .37

 .27

 .30

 .30

 .19

 .29

 .26

 .19

 .28

 .17

 .27

 .36

 .13

 .20

 .18

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .11

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 MILLERTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -44.7 15,161 0 5,183 0 805 8.73 .14

ACRE-FEET -44,661 30,072 0 10,280 0 1,597

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CANALS

FRIANT-KERN

MADERA

 10,280

 0 73,139

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = 0.14

 229.1

 62,859 0.14

CANALS

AT FRIANT

TOTAL RELEASES

OUTLET

 1,293

 1,298

 1,299

 1,297

 1,294

 1,298

 1,300

 1,298

 1,297

 1,293

 1,295

 1,295

 1,298

 1,300

 1,303

 1,298

 1,295

 1,303

 1,187

 1,097

 1,096

 981

 900

 842

 685

 484

 314

 247

 252

 252

RIVER

 31,691

 62,859

RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,393

 2,610

 3,033

 3,567

 3,718

 3,786

 5,094

 5,595

 3,381

 2,147

 1,410

 1,354

 1,370

 1,390

 1,396

 1,553

 1,640

 1,873

 1,970

 2,290

 2,824

 3,366

 3,171

 2,660

 2,437

 2,621

 2,333

 2,118

 2,652

 2,939

 974

 972

 988

 1,031

 1,067

 1,049

 1,057

 1,173

 1,166

 916

 715

 702

 697

 726

 710

 717

 712

 732

 751

 758

 770

 813

 929

 837

 779

 772

 790

 802

 854

 884

 1,419

 1,442

 1,544

 1,754

 1,720

 1,749

 2,162

 2,582

 1,822

 1,431

 1,065

 952

 933

 908

 895

 931

 964

 1,032

 1,045

 1,130

 1,296

 1,564

 1,575

 1,314

 1,344

 1,345

 1,257

 1,196

 1,334

 1,461

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 21,161

 21,299

 21,485

 21,820

 21,999

 22,246

 22,881

 23,847

 23,873

 23,650

 23,114

 22,501

 21,991

 21,483

 20,959

 20,448

 19,868

 19,146

 18,471

 17,852

 16,986

 15,968

 15,721

 15,604

 15,883

 16,276

 16,600

 16,888

 17,327

 17,857

 1,512

 1,521

 1,535

 1,559

 1,571

 1,589

 1,634

 1,703

 1,705

 1,689

 1,651

 1,607

 1,571

 1,535

 1,497

 1,461

 1,419

 1,368

 1,319

 1,275

 1,213

 1,141

 1,123

 1,115

 1,135

 1,163

 1,186

 1,206

 1,238

 1,276

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 41

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 41 (formerly part 275) appear at T.D. ATF-460, 66 FR 39093, July 27, 2001.

#### § 41.199 Notice of contemplated disapproval.

If the appropriate TTB officer has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, the appropriate TTB officer will promptly provide to the applicant a notice of the contemplated disapproval of the application and an opportunity for hearing thereon in accordance with part 71 of this chapter. If, after the notice and opportunity for hearing, the appropriate TTB officer finds that the applicant is not entitled to a permit, an order will be prepared stating the findings on which the application is denied.

[78 FR 38571, June 27, 2013]