alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Russell R. Roth, certify that;
 
 (1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc.;
 
 (2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
 the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
 this report;
 
 (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
 within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
 about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
 evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
 business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
 affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over
 financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons
 performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 19, 2003
 
 
 ___________________________________
 By:  Russell R. Roth
 Title:  Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
#### Henry B. Gayley, Respondent, v. The Healy Box Company, Limited, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
EXHIBIT 3.1
 Delaware
 __________________     PAGE 1
 The First State
   (SEAL)
    
    /s/ Harriett Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State
 3956565 8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 3818710050308716
    
    Date: 04-18-05




---



##### 



STATE OF DELAWARESECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSDELIVERED 06:47 pm 04/15/2005SRV 050308716  3956565 FILE
    ARTICLE ONE
  ARTICLE TWO
  ARTICLE THREE
  ARTICLE FOUR
  ARTICLE FIVE
  NAME
    
    MAILING ADDRESSBarbara A. Beach
    
    200 East Randolph DriveSuite 5700Chicago, Illinois 60601
 ARTICLE SIX




---



##### 



ARTICLE SEVEN
  ARTICLE EIGHT
  ARTICLE NINE
 ARTICLE NINE
 ARTICLE TEN
 ARTICLE TEN
 ARTICLE ELEVEN
  ARTICLE TWELVE
  2




---



##### 



/s/ Barbara A. BeachBarbara A. Beach, Sole Incorporator
§ 31.115 Employer identification number. ( a ) *Requirement.* The employer identification number (as defined in 26 CFR 301.7701-12) of a dealer who has been assigned such a number must be shown on each registration form filed under this part. A dealer who does not have such a number must apply for one as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and enter “number applied for” in the space for the number on the registration form; then, upon receipt of the number from the Internal Revenue Service, the dealer must provide it to TTB by separate correspondence. Failure of a dealer to include the employer identification number may result in the imposition of the penalty specified in § 31.14(b).
( b ) *Application for employer identification number.* Each dealer who files a registration form and who has not already been assigned an employer identification number must file Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form SS-4 to apply for one. The dealer shall apply for and be assigned only one employer identification number, regardless of the number of places of business for which the dealer is required to file a registration form under this part. The employer identification number shall be applied for no later than 7 days after the filing of the taxpayer's first registration form. IRS Form SS-4 may be obtained from the director of an IRS service center, from any IRS district director, from *http://www.irs.gov/ ,* or from TTB's National Revenue Center.
(26 U.S.C. 6109)
### SUBCHAPTER I—GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ASIEL RODRIGUEZ, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 19-1159

(D.C. No. 1:18-CR-00134-RM-1)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Asiel Rodriguez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess 

counterfeit access devices. The district court sentenced him to 48 months in prison. 

Although Mr. Rodriguez’s plea agreement included a waiver of his right to appeal, he 

filed this appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under 

United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

Mr. Rodriguez, through his counsel, concedes that the appeal waiver bars the appeal 

and no exception set forth in Hahn applies. Based on this concession and our 

 * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

September 17, 2019

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court
2

independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion and dismiss the 

appeal.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
(No. 6599

#### Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 3, 1973.*

Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,534

 4,453

 5,951

 5,506

 5,023

 4,731

 5,006

 4,833

 3,894

 2,981

 2,917

 3,842

 5,353

 5,489

 4,178

 3,783

 2,882

 2,502

 2,456

 2,030

 1,647

 1,491

 1,467

 1,062

 922

 779

 702

 575

 516

 470

 449

 1,160

 1,221

 1,287

 1,370

 1,362

 1,306

 1,289

 1,435

 1,555

 1,319

 1,212

 1,462

 1,903

 1,717

 1,684

 1,168

 1,135

 1,042

 998

 1,080

 972

 896

 888

 853

 751

 580

 474

 421

 382

 371

 357

 1,807

 2,194

 2,748

 2,918

 2,709

 2,627

 2,740

 2,796

 2,674

 2,208

 2,017

 2,374

 2,936

 3,038

 2,466

 2,183

 1,718

 1,486

 1,542

 1,386

 1,230

 1,113

 1,115

 945

 837

 671

 550

 470

 427

 400

 386

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 19,567

 20,473

 21,918

 23,547

 24,980

 26,178

 27,482

 28,782

 30,113

 30,953

 31,639

 32,717

 34,298

 35,786

 36,445

 36,434

 35,404

 33,972

 32,805

 31,564

 30,054

 28,371

 26,812

 25,549

 24,369

 22,666

 20,280

 17,712

 15,673

 13,890

 12,558

 1,398

 1,462

 1,566

 1,682

 1,784

 1,870

 1,963

 2,056

 2,151

 2,211

 2,260

 2,337

 2,450

 2,556

 2,603

 2,602

 2,529

 2,427

 2,343

 2,255

 2,147

 2,027

 1,915

 1,825

 1,741

 1,619

 1,449

 1,265

 1,120

 992

 897

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 75.605 Beginning the construction. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70332 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) A grantee shall begin work on construction within a reasonable time after the grant for the construction is made.
( b ) Before construction is advertised or placed on the market for bidding, the grantee shall get approval by the Secretary of the final working drawings and specifications.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.05

 360.05

 360.03

 360.49

 360.47

 360.08

 360.08

 360.19

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 541

 541

 539

 571

 570

 543

 543

 550

STORAGE

-4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+4

+0

-2

+32

-1

-27

+0

+7

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 258

 232

 233

 235

 234

 230

 232

 233

 231

 230

 237

 234

 233

 234

 234

 237

 235

 232

 230

 230

 233

 236

 235

 261

 273

 270

 810

 972

 519

 342

 417

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +9 0 9,252 0

ACRE-FEET +9 0 18,351 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 202

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 18,553

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 258

 241

 242

 241

 244

 241

 246

 249

 254

 247

 255

 246

 241

 242

 242

 242

 244

 251

 251

 251

 253

 254

 253

 274

 286

 280

 795

 913

 459

 338

 417

 9,450

 18,744

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 18,351

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 102

 202

RIVER CANALS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00721

- CV

HARVEY V. RISIEN, LLC and Harvey V. Risien

,

Appellant s

v.

MISSARK INVESTMENTS GP, LLC , Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP

Man agement, LLC, Appellee s

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15535 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The parties have filed a J oint Advisory Regarding Abatement of Appeal informing the court that they require a continuation of the abate ment of appellate proceedings for an additional two weeks to finalize their settlement agreement. We ORDE R this appeal ABATED until March 4, 2019 to permit the parties to finalize their settlement agreement. All appellate deadlines are suspended until March 4, 2 019. After March 4, 2019

, either appellants, or the parties jointly, must file a motion to dismiss the appeal due to settlement, or if the settlement is not finalized, a motion to reinstate the appeal.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of February, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 580.50

 581.70

 581.66

 582.50

 584.33

 584.79

 583.58

 583.52

 583.16

 582.39

 582.53

 583.70

 582.96

 583.41

 584.06

 583.70

 584.61

 582.24

 581.95

 580.78

 582.39

 583.37

 583.03

 585.02

 582.72

 583.15

 584.79

 583.57

 583.09

 584.84

 19,812

 20,510

 20,487

 20,985

 22,094

 22,377

 21,635

 21,599

 21,380

 20,919

 21,002

 21,708

 21,259

 21,532

 21,927

 21,708

 22,266

 20,829

 20,657

 19,973

 20,919

 21,508

 21,301

 22,520

 21,116

 21,374

 22,377

 21,629

 21,338

 22,408

STORAGE

-892

+698

-23

+498

+1,109

+283

-742

-36

-219

-461

+83

+706

-449

+273

+395

-219

+558

-1,437

-172

-684

+946

+589

-207

+1,219

-1,404

+258

+1,003

-748

-291

+1,070

CHANGE

8,289

8,982

8,657

8,944

9,256

8,835

8,677

8,795

8,661

8,469

8,979

11,638

17,429

21,094

22,757

22,352

22,732

24,848

26,769

26,032

26,829

27,198

27,930

28,665

21,946

18,623

15,984

12,554

11,046

10,607

INFLOW

 8,652

 8,542

 8,580

 8,604

 8,609

 8,606

 8,965

 8,727

 8,685

 8,613

 7,838

 9,610

 10,564

 10,188

 10,210

 10,213

 10,141

 9,605

 10,258

 10,768

 10,801

 11,001

 10,943

 10,958

 11,134

 11,242

 11,243

 11,108

 11,105

 9,980

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,014

 1,586

 7,005

 10,682

 12,261

 12,162

 12,225

 15,882

 16,512

 15,524

 15,466

 15,813

 17,004

 17,003

 11,434

 7,165

 4,149

 1,736

 0

 0

SPILL

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

 85

FISHTRAP

 2

 3

 4

 4

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 2

 2

 4

 1

 1

 1

 2

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 KESWICK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2017

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,704 493,577 295,493 194,623 2,550 50

ACRE-FEET +1,704 979,010 586,110 386,035 5,058 99

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 586,110

SPILL 386,035

 20,704

FISH TRAP 5,058

SPRING

CR. P. P.

RELEASE (1)

 14

 852

 1,105

 932

 1,190

 806

 2,093

 808

 912

 779

 873

 839

 660

 1,057

 1,468

 1,193

 1,037

 681

 1,262

 833

 572

 130

 67

 219

 38

 163

 141

 903

 668

 422

 22,717

 45,059

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM SHASTA PAN.

SHASTA

RELEASE

C.F.S

 9,138

 8,916

 8,346

 8,960

 8,875

 8,577

 7,181

 8,741

 8,620

 8,816

 8,366

 11,198

 18,420

 21,526

 22,666

 22,820

 22,992

 24,656

 27,781

 28,714

 30,183

 30,153

 29,653

 30,218

 24,459

 20,705

 17,691

 13,743

 11,787

 10,678

 514,579

 1,020,667
#### Earl Willametz et al. *v.*Irving H. Lampman et al.

*John F. Scully,*for the appellees (defendants).

*John 8. Brice,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued October 6

decided October 6, 1970

The motion by the defendant Bernard I. Friedman et al. to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,901.36

 1,901.72

 1,901.18

 1,900.99

 1,901.20

 1,901.41

 1,901.32

 1,901.49

 1,901.37

 1,901.16

 1,901.33

 1,901.46

 1,901.56

 1,901.70

 1,901.59

 1,901.75

 1,901.84

 1,901.48

 1,901.56

 1,901.67

 1,901.78

 1,901.46

 1,901.66

 1,900.95

 1,901.31

 1,901.40

 1,903.31

 1,902.66

 1,901.43

 1,901.77

 1,901.53

 14,180

 14,450

 14,046

 13,904

 14,061

 14,218

 14,150

 14,278

 14,188

 14,031

 14,158

 14,255

 14,330

 14,435

 14,352

 14,472

 14,539

 14,270

 14,330

 14,412

 14,494

 14,255

 14,405

 13,874

 14,143

 14,210

 15,660

 15,161

 14,233

 14,487

 14,307

STORAGE

-180

+270

-404

-142

+157

+157

-68

+128

-90

-157

+127

+97

+75

+105

-83

+120

+67

-269

+60

+82

+82

-239

+150

-531

+269

+67

+1,450

-499

-928

+254

-180

CHANGE

2,375

2,462

2,487

2,697

2,477

2,413

2,322

2,323

2,539

2,451

2,500

2,420

2,111

1,949

2,212

2,487

2,419

2,324

2,301

2,502

2,506

2,377

2,229

1,702

1,771

1,009

1,753

1,038

750

1,219

998

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 398

 398

 397

 395

 394

 396

 397

 396

 397

 396

 392

 385

 386

 386

 387

 383

 384

 383

 381

 383

 383

 383

 382

 381

 380

 572

 922

 1,192

 1,120

 963

 820

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

OUTLETS

 9

 5

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 8

 6

 10

 6

 7

 9

 6

 9

 6

 7

 9

 8

 8

 11

 8

 5

 9

 7

 10

 9

 7

 8

 8

 7

C.F.S.

 .42

 .24

 .33

 .31

 .30

 .32

 .23

 .36

 .28

 .47

 .27

 .31

 .43

 .27

 .40

 .25

 .30

 .40

 .35

 .36

 .50

 .37

 .22

 .40

 .30

 .46

 .39

 .32

 .35

 .35

 .34

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 LEWISTON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 3, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

C.F.S. FRANCIS CARR

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -53 65,123 0 1,860 15,312 237 10.60

ACRE-FEET -53 129,171 0 3,689 30,371 470

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) OUTLET RELEASE INCLUDES FISH RELEASE.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL POWER 0

TOTAL RIVER 34,060 128,756

 14,360

 94,696

RIVER

JUDGE FRANCIS CARR POWERPLANT

TOTAL RELEASE

JUDGE (2)

(1) POWERPLANT

 1,999

 1,863

 2,227

 2,307

 1,937

 1,871

 1,892

 1,794

 2,121

 2,064

 1,978

 1,919

 1,618

 1,444

 1,798

 1,978

 1,934

 2,008

 1,822

 2,010

 2,011

 2,046

 1,706

 1,520

 1,188

 333

 31

 31

 30

 60

 202

 47,742

 94,696

Table 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 425.36

 424.90

 424.41

 423.91

 423.50

 423.08

 422.65

 422.24

 421.86

 421.46

 420.99

 420.68

 420.36

 419.90

 419.45

 419.00

 418.58

 418.13

 417.81

 417.50

 417.09

 416.69

 416.30

 415.94

 415.62

 415.39

 415.13

 414.83

 414.50

 414.14

 573.0

 569.0

 564.9

 560.6

 557.1

 553.6

 550.0

 546.5

 543.4

 540.0

 536.1

 533.6

 531.0

 527.2

 523.5

 519.8

 516.4

 512.8

 510.2

 507.8

 504.5

 501.3

 498.2

 495.4

 492.8

 491.0

 489.0

 486.6

 484.1

 481.3

STORAGE

-4.4

-4.0

-4.2

-4.3

-3.5

-3.6

-3.6

-3.4

-3.2

-3.3

-3.9

-2.6

-2.6

-3.8

-3.7

-3.7

-3.4

-3.6

-2.6

-2.5

-3.3

-3.2

-3.1

-2.9

-2.5

-1.8

-2.0

-2.3

-2.6

-2.8

CHANGE

588

634

560

531

947

775

721

848

884

1,065

809

1,336

1,328

820

846

845

949

945

1,266

1,318

947

825

797

839

1,043

1,340

1,178

1,030

1,048

891

INFLOW

 2,647

 2,443

 2,512

 2,528

 2,562

 2,451

 2,422

 2,470

 2,359

 2,615

 2,640

 2,492

 2,536

 2,602

 2,568

 2,587

 2,551

 2,668

 2,447

 2,436

 2,509

 2,322

 2,247

 2,170

 2,214

 2,149

 2,099

 2,101

 2,248

 2,194

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 125

 129

 133

 128

 113

 104

 108

 103

 108

 114

 119

 117

 108

 109

 112

 100

 95

 99

 110

 120

 80

 94

 98

 101

 96

 97

 103

 103

 89

 80

PUMPING

 29

 54

 23

 23

 20

 11

 11

 8

 17

 11

 17

 14

 11

 14

 16

 8

 14

 11

 5

 13

 13

 11

 11

 5

 0

 5

 5

 8

 5

 29

C.F.S.

 .10

 .19

 .08

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .19

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -96.4 27,953 72,789 0 0 3,195 422 1.53 .77

ACRE-FEET -96,400 55,445 144,377 0 0 6,337 837

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 144,377

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 6,337

TOTAL 150,714

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 3.25

 577.4

OUTLET 0 .77
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,197.12

 1,197.09

 1,197.06

 1,197.03

 1,197.00

 1,196.96

 1,196.93

 1,196.92

 1,196.90

 1,196.87

 1,196.85

 1,196.81

 1,196.79

 1,196.76

 1,196.73

 1,196.70

 1,196.68

 1,196.66

 1,196.64

 1,196.61

 1,196.58

 1,196.53

 1,196.50

 1,196.47

 1,196.44

 1,196.42

 1,196.40

 1,196.39

 1,196.36

 1,196.33

 46.37

 46.32

 46.27

 46.22

 46.16

 46.10

 46.04

 46.03

 45.99

 45.94

 45.91

 45.84

 45.80

 45.75

 45.70

 45.65

 45.62

 45.58

 45.55

 45.50

 45.45

 45.36

 45.31

 45.26

 45.21

 45.18

 45.14

 45.13

 45.07

 45.02

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

-0.05

-0.03

-0.07

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.09

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.05

-0.05

CHANGE

-5

-4

-6

-6

-8

-14

-12

14

4

-2

5

-16

0

-9

-9

-5

6

5

6

0

-1

-17

-9

-9

-4

9

5

13

-5

-4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

 9

OUTLET

 12

 13

 11

 11

 9

 11

 14

 14

 12

 15

 13

 10

 8

 8

 8

 12

 14

 13

 14

 17

 16

 17

 8

 8

 13

 17

 13

 13

 12

 13

C.F.S.

 .21

 .23

 .20

 .20

 .17

 .20

 .25

 .25

 .21

 .27

 .24

 .18

 .14

 .14

 .14

 .21

 .26

 .23

 .26

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .14

 .15

 .23

 .31

 .24

 .24

 .22

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/03/2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.36 -78 270 0 369 6.65 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,360 -155 536 0 732

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 536

 536

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2016 .00

 46.42