alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.96 Use off premises. The proprietor may remove samples of wine or wine spirits free of tax for analysis or testing purposes. ( a ) *Size.* The size of each sample may not be more than one liter for each lot of wine or wine spirits to be analyzed or tested unless the appropriate TTB officer authorizes a larger quantity.
( b ) *Disposition of samples.* Remnants or residues of samples remaining after analysis or testing, and which are not retained as specimens, will be destroyed or returned to bonded wine premises. Free of tax samples or residues may not be consumed or sold.
( c ) *Records.* The proprietor shall maintain records of all samples taken for analysis or testing, showing the size of each sample, the kind of wine or wine spirits, date of removal, and the name and address to where sent.
( d ) *Labeling of samples.* Each sample taken for analysis or testing will be labeled “Sample for Analysis Only”. The label will show the name, address, and registry number of the bonded wine premises, date, and the kind of wine or wine spirits.
( e ) *Limitation.* The tax will be collected on any wine or wine spirits withdrawn under this section which are used or disposed of for purposes other than as authorized. When the quantity of wine or wine spirits withdrawn under this section exceeds the amount necessary for the purpose intended the tax will be collected on such excess.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1380, as amended, 1381, as amended, 1382, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5362, 5367, 5368, 5373))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0298 and 1512-0503) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: Angela Carter-Banks XXX-XX-2696

 

Case No. 19-35923-KRH

DIRECTIVE FOR VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS BY DEBTOR

The Debtor(s) having filed a petition under Chapter 13, Title 11 U.S.C. or converted this case 

from Chapter 7;

IT IS DIRECTED;

That commencing immediately and continuing on the 9th day of each and every month 

thereafter until further Directive from the Trustee, the Debtor(s) shall pay to Carl M. Bates, 

Trustee, and send to Chapter 13 Trustee, PO Box 1433, Memphis, TN 38101-1433, the sum 

of $647.00 monthly. The payment should include the debtor's name and case number above.

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 04-1 OF THE 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: December 05, 2019

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the Debtor and 

electronically sent to Debtor’s counsel on the date above written.

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Case 19-35923-KRH Doc 16 Filed 12/05/19 Entered 12/05/19 17:00:43 Desc 

 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter A.
Shephard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                            
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Dated:
  November 9, 2006                  
| |                                            
| | /s/ Walter
  A. Shephard                   
| |                                            
| | Walter A.
  Shephard                       
| | Vice
  President, Finance,                 
| | Chief
  Financial Officer, and Treasurer of
| | Zygo
  Corporation                         

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.295 Record of unsalable beer.

A brewer having unsalable beer in packages or tanks in the brewery may destroy, recondition, or use the beer as material. The brewer shall report the quantity of the beer destroyed, reconditioned, or used as materials, in daily records and on Form 5130.9. If the unsalable beer consists of rejects from the packaging operations, the beer may be destroyed without being included in the packaging production records, and, when so destroyed, will be so reported in the brewer's daily records and on Form 5130.9. When reject bottled beer is to be consumed at the brewery or sold to brewery employees, or is cased or otherwise accumulated pending other disposition, the quantity will be included in the packaging production and be so reported in the brewer's daily records and on Form 5130.9.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389 as amended, 1390, as amended, 1395 as amended (26 U.S.C. 5411, 5415, 5555))
EXHIBIT 12.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              /s/  José F. Serrano SegoviaJosé F. Serrano SegoviaChief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128899 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver & (53) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, MEIJER, INC., Justices Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 128899 COA: 252660 Tax Tribunal: 00-190704 CITY OF MIDLAND, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered, and they are DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
Opinion issued December 17 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00 509
- CV

——————————— IN RE FREDERICK H. SCHRADER AND CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. , Relator s
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator s , Frederick H. Schrader and Constellation Brands, Inc. , ha ve filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging two trial court orders : a March 18, 2020 order denying Schrader’s “Motion to Disqualify John W. Newton III and Roach Newton LLP” and a June 29, 2020 order denying Constellation Brands, Inc. ’s “Motion for Protection Regarding Apex Deposition of Constellation CEO &
President Bill Newlands

. ”2

We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. 1 A ll pending motions are
dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hightower, and Countiss.

1 The underlying case is Robert M. (Randy) Roach, Jr. v. Frederick H. Schrader and Constellation Brands, Inc. , Cause No. 20 18

- 59845 , in the 189 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Scot “Dolli” Dollinger presiding.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6636
ROBERT WAYNE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT MATTOX, in his individual and official capacities; SE RGEANT ROSS, in his individual and official capacities; CORPORAL PARKER, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-144-8BD) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Wayne Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Alexan dria Skinner, SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Mattox , No. CA96-144-8BD (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 1997. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         359,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,602,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                   102,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,693,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,855,313
<PP&E>                                      26,143,515
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,455,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,803,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,087,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,977
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,677,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,803,356
<SALES>                                        454,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,681,578
<CGS>                                          395,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,218,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (558,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (558,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (558,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.4







January
29, 2009










Securities
and Exchange Commission




100 F
Street, NE




Washington,
D.C. 20549




Re:
            Ameron
      International Corporation Annual Report on 10-K for the fiscal year
      ended




December
      31, 2008 - File No. 001-09102





Dear
Sirs:





Neither
Ameron International Corporation (the “Company”) nor any of its consolidated
subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt,
other than those filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, under which the total amount of
securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii)
of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR Sec. 229.601), the Company hereby agrees
to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of
each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long term debt not
filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.








Very
truly yours,








/s/ James R.
McLaughlin


James R.
McLaughlin


Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer








JRM:ly
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5426 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the unsafe 

use of electric scooters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. SIRES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a 

study on the unsafe use of electric scooters, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON THE UNSAFE USE OF ELECTRIC 

4 SCOOTERS. 

5 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Transpor6 tation, acting through the Administrator of the National 

7 Highway Traffic Safety Administration, shall conduct a 

8 study on— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5426 IH

1 (1) the behavior of individuals using electric 

2 scooters while under the influence of alcohol or 

3 drugs; 

4 (2) the involvement of electric scooters in traffic 

5 accidents; and 

6 (3) the effects on pedestrian, scooter user, and 

7 motorist safety resulting from— 

8 (A) the lack of laws governing the use of 

9 electric scooters; and 

10 (B) a lack of required training on the safe 

11 operation of electric scooters prior to an indi12 vidual using such a scooter. 

13 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 12 months after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

15 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall 

16 submit to Congress a report containing Federal, State, 

17 and local policy recommendations based on the findings 

18 of the study required by this section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### Part AA—Masters and Postbaccalaureate Programs
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 79898

- 7

- I

)

Respondent, )

)

v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION

)

WILLAIM FRANCIS MULL, JR.

, )

)

Appellant. )

P ER C URIAM

— William Francis Mull Jr. appeals two orders denying his

postjudgment motions to withdraw his guilty plea. In his brief, however, Mull

raises issues concerning financial obligations imposed in his earlier judgment

and sent ence. The State points out, and Mull does not dispute, that Mull did not

timely appeal his judgment and sentence, that the appealed o rders d o not involve

the financial obligations imposed in his sentence, that Mull’s notice of appeal

from those orders does not designate the original judgment and sentence for

review, and that Mull’s attempt to raise issues involving his sentence in this

appeal is therefore untimely and procedurally defective

.

In the absence of any res ponse from Mull on these points and given the

availability of other proper avenues of relief

, s ee State v. Smissaert

, 103 Wn.2dNo. 79898

- 7

- I / 2

2

636, 639 , 694 P.2d 654 (1985) ( t he trial court has the power and duty to correct

an erroneous sentence at any time ) , and RAP 16.3

, we dismiss the appeal.

FOR THE COURT:
### §471. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §560, 42 Stat. 977, related to prohibition of ownership of bonded warehouses by customs officers.

Corresponding provisions of Tariff Act of 1930, see section 1560 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 662

 772

 1,460

 1,899

 2,461

 2,936

 3,018

 3,392

 3,362

 2,784

 2,322

 2,533

 2,942

 2,744

 3,338

 3,538

 4,328

 4,426

 4,397

 5,285

 5,085

 5,285

 5,950

 4,805

 4,371

 4,484

 5,526

 5,833

 6,529

 6,539

 219

 247

 259

 305

 350

 371

 379

 394

 735

 418

 491

 436

 438

 515

 381

 482

 501

 502

 510

 498

 617

 593

 878

 1,045

 608

 541

 771

 690

 791

 1,379

 308

 325

 424

 615

 771

 926

 1,076

 1,362

 1,680

 1,279

 1,249

 1,170

 1,124

 1,066

 1,253

 1,398

 1,688

 1,948

 2,185

 2,367

 2,585

 2,880

 3,221

 2,785

 2,395

 2,642

 2,982

 3,164

 3,452

 3,786

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 37,370

 32,779

 28,096

 23,846

 19,327

 15,506

 10,081

 8,271

 9,052

 9,895

 10,852

 11,735

 12,578

 13,375

 14,320

 15,393

 16,657

 17,990

 19,404

 20,845

 22,354

 23,872

 25,413

 26,919

 28,065

 29,537

 31,395

 33,493

 35,692

 38,080

 2,669

 2,341

 2,007

 1,703

 1,381

 1,108

 720

 591

 647

 707

 775

 838

 898

 955

 1,023

 1,100

 1,190

 1,285

 1,386

 1,489

 1,597

 1,705

 1,815

 1,923

 2,005

 2,110

 2,243

 2,392

 2,549

 2,720

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 24.225 Production and use of spirits. ( a ) *Withdrawal of spirits.* The proprietor of a bonded wine premises may withdraw and receive wine spirits without payment of tax from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant for use as provided in this section.
( b ) *Production and use of wine spirits* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The only products considered to be wine spirits authorized for use in wine production under this section are brandy or wine spirits produced in a distilled spirits plant (with or without the use of water to facilitate the extraction and distillation) exclusively from: ( i ) Fresh or dried fruit or their residues;
( ii ) Natural wine or wine residues from fresh or dried fruit, including spirits byproducts of authorized wine treatments to reduce alcohol; or
( iii ) Special natural wine. If wine spirits produced from special natural wine contain any flavor characteristics of the special natural wine, those wine spirits may be used only in the production of a special natural wine.
( 2 ) *Distillation proof requirements.* The proof of wine spirits at distillation must not be reduced by the addition of water. In addition, a product is not considered to be wine spirits if it is distilled at less than 140 degrees of proof except in the following cases: ( i ) Commercial brandy aged in wood for a period of not less than 2 years, and barreled at not less than 100 degrees of proof, shall be deemed wine spirits for purposes of this section; and
( ii ) Spirits byproducts of alcohol reduction processing authorized under § 24.248 that are produced at a distilled spirits plant and distilled, if necessary, at not less than 90 degrees of proof shall be deemed wine spirits for purposes of this section.
( 3 ) *Addition of sugar after fermentation.* When, in the production of natural wine or special natural wine, sugar has been added after fermentation, the wine may not be refermented to develop alcohol from such added sugar and then used in the production of wine spirits.
( 4 ) *Addition of wine spirits to natural wine.* ( i ) Wine spirits produced in the United States may be added to natural wine on bonded wine premises if both the wine and the spirits are produced from the same kind of fruit.
( ii ) In the case of natural still wine, wine spirits may be added in any State only to wine produced by fermentation on bonded wine premises located within the same State.
( iii ) If wine has been ameliorated, wine spirits may be added (whether or not wine spirits were previously added) only if the wine contains not more than 14 percent of alcohol by volume derived from fermentation.
( c ) *Spirits other than wine spirits.* Spirits other than wine spirits may be received, stored, and used on bonded premises only for the production of nonbeverage wine products.
[T.D. TTB-185, 87 FR 51897, Aug. 24, 2022]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 769

 779

 828

 739

 786

 920

 903

 899

 879

 887

 858

 860

 856

 852

 841

 839

 826

 782

 768

 767

 815

 709

 730

 725

 791

 716

 729

 761

 753

 735

 686

 498

 490

 494

 474

 503

 532

 863

 866

 863

 833

 830

 854

 852

 837

 833

 819

 761

 763

 761

 618

 713

 629

 588

 623

 601

 540

 597

 581

 589

 645

 652

 594

 596

 627

 520

 605

 825

 881

 880

 871

 861

 844

 856

 853

 847

 837

 833

 805

 770

 765

 719

 786

 672

 667

 653

 703

 609

 660

 667

 699

 671

 671

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 383

 384

 403

 337

 390

 526

 560

 560

 554

 548

 538

 545

 543

 539

 533

 531

 513

 492

 489

 460

 502

 431

 428

 420

 450

 392

 424

 428

 448

 431

 431

TOTAL 22,847

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              200
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    200
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            15,557
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         10,775
<OTHER-SE>                                      (26,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        200
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   210,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (210,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (210,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (210,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.02)



</TABLE>