alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.182 Use of acid to correct natural deficiencies. ( a ) *General.* Acids of the kinds occurring in grapes or other fruit (including berries) may be added within the limitations of § 24.246 to juice or wine in order to correct natural deficiencies; however, no acid may be added to juice or wine which is ameliorated to correct natural deficiencies except that in the production of grape wine, tartaric acid may be used to reduce the pH of the juice or wine. If tartaric acid is used to correct the pH of grape juice or wine, the fixed acid level of the juice shall be measured prior to the addition of any tartaric acid to determine the maximum quantity of ameliorating material allowed. In addition, when using tartaric acid to reduce the pH of ameliorated grape juice or wine, the pH cannot be reduced below 3.0.
( b ) *Grape wine.* Tartaric acid or malic acid, or a combination of tartaric acid and malic acid, may be added prior to or during fermentation, to grapes or juice from grapes. In addition, after fermentation is completed, citric acid, fumaric acid, malic acid, lactic acid or tartaric acid, or a combination of two or more of these acids, may be added to correct natural deficiencies. However, the use of these acids, either prior to, during or after fermentation, may not increase the fixed acid level of the finished wine (calculated as tartaric acid) above 9.0 grams per liter. In cases where the wine contains 8.0 or more grams of total solids per 100 milliliters of wine, acids may be added to the extent that the finished wine does not contain more than 11.0 grams per liter of fixed acid (calculated as tartaric acid).
( c ) *Fruit wine.* Only citric acid may be added to citrus fruit, juice or wine, only malic acid may be added to apples, apple juice or wine, and only citric acid or malic acid may be added to other fruit (including berries) or to juice or wine derived from other fruit (including berries) to correct natural deficiencies to 9.0 grams per liter of finished wine; however, if the wine contains 8.0 or more grams of total solids per 100 milliliters of wine, acids may be added to correct natural deficiencies to the extent that the finished wine does not contain more than 11.0 grams per liter of fixed acid (calculated as malic acid for apples and citric acid for other fruit (including berries).
( d ) *Other use of acid.* A winemaker desiring to use an acid other than the acids allowed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section to correct natural deficiencies shall follow the procedure prescribed in § 24.250. A winemaker desiring to use acid to stabilize standard wine shall follow the requirements prescribed by § 24.244.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1383, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5382))
[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31078, July 9, 1991; T.D. ATF-350, 58 FR 52230, Oct. 7, 1993]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 27, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as
an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)
(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ A. ROLAND THOMASName:  A. Roland ThomasTitle:    President and ChiefExecutive Officer
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 18, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 00902
- CV
IN RE BRENDEN F. DET ERMANN , Relator On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 02
- 05622
- R

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang

- Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relator contends the trial judge’s default order and judgment naming him as the fath er of a child is void. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief.

130902F.P05 /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 16 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 17 of 18
Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 9 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 09/01/20 12:16:22 Desc Main

Document Page 18 of 18
#### § 19.71 Registration and permits in general.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, a person may only conduct operations as a distiller, warehouseman, or processor of distilled spirits on the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant. In order to establish a distilled spirits plant, a person must register the plant with TTB and obtain an operating permit and/or a basic permit. This subpart covers the requirements for registering a plant and obtaining an operating permit under the IRC. Part 1 of this chapter covers the requirements for obtaining a basic permit under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act.

(26 U.S.C. 5171)
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mingxia Yuan, the Chief Financial Officer of
TSINGYUAN BREWERY LTD. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 23rdday of May, 2011.

/s/ Mingxia
YuanMingxia Yuan Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Tsingyuan Brewery Ltd. and will be retained by
Tsingyuan Brewery Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
# [

Page 1 of 1 

# ] Sanitized T est Data
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.22

 360.22

 360.33

 360.33

 360.35

 360.68

 360.68

 360.68

 360.68

 360.71

 360.71

 360.74

 360.77

 360.77

 360.74

 360.74

 360.74

 360.74

 360.74

 360.60

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 552

 552

 560

 560

 562

 585

 585

 585

 585

 587

 587

 589

 591

 591

 589

 589

 589

 589

 589

 579

STORAGE

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+8

+0

+0

+0

+0

+7

+0

+8

+0

+2

+23

+0

+0

+0

+2

+0

+2

+2

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

-10

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 146

 171

 221

 256

 300

 300

 315

 348

 381

 347

 330

 293

 224

 226

 225

 226

 227

 227

 308

 406

 404

 415

 402

 535

 602

 742

 803

 806

 1,199

 1,500

 1,503

 1,519

 1,510

 1,512

 1,515

 1,505

 1,510

 1,510

 1,509

 1,500

 1,503

 1,503

 1,339

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2008

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +40 0 28,915 3,408

ACRE-FEET +40 0 57,353 6,760

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 34,479

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 6,760

 98,592

 539

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 210

 212

 262

 173

 281

 279

 324

 392

 391

 697

 915

 1,017

 1,057

 1,279

 1,359

 1,369

 1,740

 1,992

 1,992

 2,268

 2,347

 2,446

 2,523

 2,645

 2,705

 2,709

 2,712

 2,695

 2,660

 2,641

 2,513

 46,805

 92,838

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 57,353

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 270

 474

 475

 476

 595

 655

 657

 660

 658

 650

 779

 790

 838

 892

 933

 972

 1,083

 1,127

 1,107

 1,111

 1,101

 1,080

 17,383

 34,479

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
#### § 19.80 Approved notice of registration.

A person may not operate a distilled spirits plant unless a notice of registration has been approved by TTB authorizing the businesses and operations to be conducted at such plant. When approved by the appropriate TTB officer, the application for registration constitutes the notice of registration of the distilled spirits plant. A distilled spirits plant will not be registered or reregistered under this subpart until the applicant has complied with all requirements of law and regulations relating to the qualification of the business or operations in which the applicant intends to engage. In any instance where a person is required to have a bond or permit and the bond or permit becomes invalid, then the notice of registration also becomes invalid. Another application for registration must be filed and a new notice of registration approved by TTB before the business or operation at such plant may be resumed. Reregistration of a plant is not required when a new bond or a strengthening bond is filed in accordance with § 19.167 or § 19.168.

(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5172)
(No. 77-CC-1164

#### Perez Funches, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 18, 1979.*

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois correctional institution, has brought this action to recover for the alleged loss of a gold wedding band, a pair of glasses, a three piece suit and some photographs. Claimant alleges that these items were lost during the course of his transfer from the Vienna Correctional Center to the Pontiac State Penitentiary.

It appears that at the time of his transfer his personal property was inventoried and packed, and *669shipped to his mother at an address furnished by Claimant. Claimant signed the inventory as presented to him, and alleges that the items issued were either not on the inventory, or they were on the inventory and not received by his mother.

Claimant acknowledged that his mother received some of his personal property, which was shipped via Greyhound bus. His property therefore could have disappeared anywhere in transit. Further, Claimant’s testimony was ambigous and inconsistent with respect to how he came into possession of certain of the property at issue, and the cost of that property.

For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Claimant has failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the State came into actual possession of the items of property at issue, or that the property was lost due to negligence on the part of the State.

It is therefore ordered that this claim be, and hereby is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.56 Formula No. 29. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: One gallon of 100 percent acetaldehyde or 5 gallons of an alcohol solution of acetaldehyde containing not less than 20 percent acetaldehyde, or 1 gallon of ethyl acetate having an ester content of 100 percent, or, where approved by the appropriate TTB officer, as to material and quantity, not less than 6.8 pounds if solid, or 1 gallon if liquid, of any chemical. When material other than acetaldehyde or ethyl acetate is proposed to be used, the user shall submit an application for such use to the appropriate TTB officer. The application shall include specifications, assay methods, and an 8-ounce sample of the substitute material for analysis.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a raw material: 511. Vinegar. 512. Acetic acid. 521. Ethyl acetate. 522. Ethyl chloride. 523. Other ethyl esters. 530. Ethylamines. 540. Dyes and intermediates. 551. Acetaldehyde. 552. Other aldehydes. 561. Ethyl ether. 562. Other ethers. 571. Ethylene dibromide. 572. Ethylene gas. 573. Xanthates. 575. Drugs and medicinal chemicals. 579. Other chemicals. 580. Synthetic rubber. 590. Synthetic resins.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses: 812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
( c ) *Conditions governing use.* This formula is restricted to processes in which the alcohol loses its identity by being converted into other chemicals.
#### Joseph Dobbins, Respondent, v. Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred,
§ 24.46 Application. ( a ) An employer identification number will be assigned pursuant to application on Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form SS-4 filed by the taxpayer. IRS Form SS-4 may be obtained from the director of the service center or from any district director.
( b ) An application on IRS Form SS-4 will be made by the taxpayer who, prior to filing the first return, has neither secured nor made application for an employer identification number. An application on IRS Form SS-4 will be filed on or before the seventh day after the date on which the first return is filed.
( c ) Each taxpayer shall make application for and be assigned only one employer identification number, regardless of the number of places of business for which the taxpayer is required to file a tax return under the provisions of this part. (Pub. L. 87-397, 75 Stat. 828, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6109))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492)
### §§484 to 493. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§582–591, 42 Stat. 979–981, related to examination of persons and baggage, production and certification of manifests, and enforcement provisions.

Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to section 484, see section 1582 of this title: section 485, see section 1583 of this title; section 486, see section 1584 of this title; section 487, see section 1585 of this title; section 488, see section 1586 of this title; section 489, see section 1586(d) of this title; section 490, see section 1588 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.102 Bay rum, alcoholado, or alcoholado-type toilet waters. Unless manufactured exclusively for export under a formula approved by TTB and endorsed “For Export Only,” bay rum, alcoholado, or alcoholado-type toilet waters made with S.D.S. shall contain in each gallon of finished product: ( a ) 71 milligrams of denatonium benzoate (also known as benzyldiethyl (2:6-xylylcarbamoyl methyl) ammonium benzoate) in addition to any of this material used as a denaturant in the specially denatured alcohol;
( b ) 2 grams of tartar emetic; or
( c ) 0.5 avoirdupois ounce of sucrose octaacetate.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59457, Aug. 30, 2016]
(No. 73-CC-90

#### Buecker Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Co., A Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 14, 1974.*

Drach, Terrell and Deffenbaugh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

*219This matter comes before the Court on a Joint Stipulation as to Facts submitted by the claimant and respondent.

Pursuant to a public bid and letting, claimant entered into two certain contracts with respondent with respect to a project pertaining to work to be performed on a certain building owned or occupied by the respondent at 11th and Ash Streets, Springfield, Illinois. These contracts were entered into and approved by and through the Department of General Services on or about June 8, 1971, and June 30, 1971.

Phase I involved primarily work to be done below ground level, while Phase II involved primarily work to be done above ground level.

After the work called for in the contract referred to as Phase I had been commenced, the respondent revised the plans concerning the work to be performed under said Phase I, and requested the claimant to complete the work called for in Phase I in accordance with said revisions, which revisions were set forth in a series of change orders prepared by the claimant and approved by the Department.

Change Order No. 1, dated August 31, 1971, called for an additional expenditure of $7,458.08.

Respondent later determined it would be necessary to eliminate the above ground roof drainage system, as called for in the plans for Phase II, with a below ground drainage system not originally called for in the Phase I plans.

Plan changes were made by the claimant and claimant proceeded to construct the project in accordance with the revised plans.

*220This work was completed without the issuance of a proper Change Order.

When payment was requested for this particular work, it was denied on recommendation by the Consulting Architect on behalf of the Department of General Services on the grounds that the work for which payment was requested had been previously paid under Change Order No. 1 of Phase I, dated August 31, 1971.

As a result of this, claimant refused to sign a "Substantial Completion Form” and the Department of General Services therefore withheld the required retainage of $1,029.51.

A joint detailed study of the construction records and plans was then made by the claimant and representatives of the respondent, and as a result of this study, respondent has concluded that the claimant had performed work under the contract for which he had not been reimbursed in the amount of $10,972.45, and the claimant has concluded that the work for which he had not been reimbursed was $10,958.94.

The claimant has agreed to revise their claim from $13,011.94, plus retainage of $1,978.10, to the present claim of $10,958.94, plus retainage of $1,029.51, for a total claim of $11,988.45.

It is the opinion of the Court that the claimant is entitled to the sum of $11,988.45, and an award is hereby entered for the payment of said amount.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.99

 361.01

 361.04

 361.01

 360.01

 361.04

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.04

 361.04

 361.04

 361.01

 360.99

 360.99

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.04

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 361.01

 360.77

 360.74

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 606

 608

 610

 608

 538

 610

 608

 608

 608

 608

 610

 610

 610

 608

 606

 606

 608

 608

 608

 610

 608

 608

 608

 608

 608

 608

 591

 589

 591

 591

 591

STORAGE

-2

+2

+2

-2

-70

+72

-2

+0

+0

+0

+2

+0

+0

-2

-2

+0

+2

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-17

-2

+2

+0

+0

CHANGE

 182

 206

 240

 268

 287

 300

 301

 296

 326

 304

 291

 308

 340

 364

 317

 193

 299

 279

 289

 301

 301

 301

 312

 309

 311

 323

 346

 356

 345

 330

 332

 2,014

 2,014

 2,040

 2,025

 2,012

 2,022

 2,017

 2,001

 2,036

 2,028

 2,058

 2,043

 2,021

 2,009

 2,001

 2,042

 2,032

 2,037

 2,039

 2,042

 2,022

 1,998

 2,004

 2,021

 2,040

 2,027

 1,684

 1,512

 1,510

 1,511

 1,531

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2011

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -17 0 60,393 9,257

ACRE-FEET -17 0 119,790 18,361

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 53,023

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 18,361

 191,174

 608

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 3,118

 3,088

 3,128

 3,156

 3,198

 3,304

 3,362

 3,360

 3,339

 3,273

 3,293

 3,318

 3,323

 3,297

 3,201

 3,147

 3,241

 3,229

 3,245

 3,213

 3,169

 3,180

 3,218

 3,127

 3,087

 3,091

 2,752

 2,666

 2,677

 2,665

 2,703

 97,168

 192,733

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 119,790

 812

 792

 785

 804

 869

 953

 1,008

 1,037

 956

 912

 908

 943

 935

 900

 904

 906

 907

 886

 896

 839

 820

 836

 839

 749

 692

 693

 712

 845

 873

 860

 861

 26,732

 53,023

RIVER CANALS
#### § 19.717 Time for making entries in records.

A proprietor of an alcohol fuel plant must record entries required by this subpart in the proprietor's records on a daily basis, as the transaction or operation occurs, but not later than the close of the next business day after the occurrence of the transaction or operation. However, if a proprietor prepares supplemental or auxiliary records when an operation or transaction occurs and those records contain all of the information required under this subpart, the proprietor may make entries in the required records not later than the close of business on the third business day following the day on which the transaction or operation occurred.

(26 U.S.C. 5207)