alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.33.2
  MAGELLAN SHIPPING CORPORATION
 
  
 Annual Meetings.
 Special Meeting.
 Notice of Meetings.
 Quorum.
 Voting.
 1




---



##### 



Fixing of Record Dates.
 
 Number.
 How Elected.
 Removal.
 Vacancies.
 Regular Meetings.
 Special Meetings.
 2




---



##### 



Notice of Special Meeting.
 Quorum.
 Voting.
 Compensation of Directors and Members of Committees.
 
 Executive Committee and Other Committees.
 
 Number and Designation.
 3




---



##### 



President.
 Treasurer.
 Secretary.
 Other Officers:
 Bond.
 4




---



##### 



Form and Issuance.
 Transfer.
 Loss of Stock Certificates.
 
 Declaration and Form.
 
 Corporate Seal.
 
 . Fiscal Year.
 
 By the Shareholders.
 5




---



##### 



By the Directors.
 6
### §582a–2. Authorization of appropriations; other allotments and grants

To enable the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as the Congress may from time to time determine to be necessary but not exceeding in any one fiscal year one-half the amount appropriated for Federal forestry research conducted directly by the Department of Agriculture for the fiscal year preceding the year in which the budget is presented for such appropriation. Funds appropriated and made available to the States under this subchapter shall be in addition to allotments or grants that may be made under other authorizations.

(Pub. L. 87–788, §3, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 806.)
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of John Lyon and Others, as Executors, etc., of William Abrams, Deceased, Respondents. Julia E. Fowler and Alice A. Hutcheson, Appellants.

— Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REUBEN MCDOWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 135 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 628.41 What are the obligations of an institution that the Secretary selects to receive an endowment challenge grant? ( a ) An institution that the Secretary selects to receive an endowment challenge grant shall— ( 1 ) Enter into an agreement with the Secretary to administer the endowment challenge grant;
( 2 ) Establish an endowment fund independent of any other endowment fund established by or for that institution;
( 3 ) Deposit its matching funds in the endowment fund established under this part;
( 4 ) Upon receipt, immediately deposit the grant funds into the endowment fund established under this part; and
( 5 ) Within fifteen working days after receiving the grant funds, invest the endowment fund corpus.
( b ) Before the Secretary disburses grant funds and not later than a date established by the Secretary through a notice in the Federal Register (which date may not be later than the earlier of the last day of availability of appropriations or eighteen months after an institution has been notified that it has been selected to receive a grant), an institution shall— ( 1 ) Match, with cash or low-risk securities, the endowment challenge grant funds to be received under this part;
( 2 ) Certify to the Secretary— ( i ) The source, kind and amount of the eligible matching funds;
( ii ) That the matching funds are eligible under paragraph (b)(1) of this section and § 628.42; and
( 3 ) Have a certified public accountant or other licensed public accountant, who is not an employee of the institution, certify that the data contained in the application is accurate.
( c ) ( 1 ) For the purpose of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, “cash” may include cash on hand, certificates of deposit and money market funds; and
( 2 ) A negotiable security, to be considered as part of the institution's match— ( i ) Must be low-risk as required in § 628.43; and
( ii ) Must be assessed at its market value as of the end of the trading day on the date the institution deposits the security into the endowment fund established under this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0564) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065)
[49 FR 28521, July 21, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 37325, Sept. 21, 1984; 52 FR 11258, Apr. 8, 1987; 53 FR 49146, Dec. 6, 1988]
### SUBCHAPTER III—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES FOR EDUCATION OF INDIAN CHILDREN
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF FIRST INDIANA CORPORATION



First Indiana Corporation has the following wholly owned subsidiaries, which
are organized under the laws of the United States:



|                                         |  |                                           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Bank, National Association |  | United States of America                  
|                                         | 
|Somerset Financial Services, L.L.C.      |  | Indiana                                   
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Capital Trust I            |  | Delaware                                  
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Capital Statutory Trust II |  | Connecticut                               



First Indiana Bank has
the following direct and indirect subsidiaries:



|                                      |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|                                      | 
|First Indiana Investor Services, Inc. |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|One Mortgage Corporation              |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|One Investment Company, L.L.C.        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                      | 
|One Investment Partners, L.L.C.       |  | Delaware                                  
|                                      | 
|Pioneer Service Corporation           |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|MB Realty Company                     |  | Indiana                                   



First Indiana
Corporation has the following direct subsidiary:



|                             |  |                                           
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|                             | 
|National Tax Company, L.L.C. |  | Indiana
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 192

 194

 192

 192

 193

 195

 196

 201

 207

 207

 203

 200

 198

 195

 195

 200

 201

 204

 214

 222

 228

 233

 237

 239

 239

 240

 241

 241

 242

 245

 245

 177

 179

 183

 183

 183

 182

 183

 183

 187

 189

 192

 194

 193

 190

 187

 188

 187

 186

 186

 189

 194

 202

 208

 214

 216

 217

 217

 218

 216

 217

 217

 183

 187

 187

 187

 187

 187

 188

 190

 195

 198

 198

 197

 195

 193

 192

 192

 192

 192

 197

 203

 208

 215

 221

 227

 228

 231

 232

 232

 231

 232

 232

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

James P Morgan Jr. Case # 18-13800-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

JAMES P MORGAN JR. 

15472 Ambergate Drive 

Woodbridge, VA 22193 

AMOUNT 

$2,073.60 

Dated: April 13, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 18-13800-BFK Doc 73 Filed 04/13/20 Entered 04/13/20 12:40:14 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Contact:Patriot National Bank
    
    Christopher D. Maher
    
    Robert F. OConnell900 Bedford Street
    
    President & CEO
    
    Sr. EVP & CFOStamford, CT 06901
    
    203 251-8265
    
    203 324-7500
 Patriot National Bancorp Completes Operational Restructuring
  Below are key highlights of new managements achievements since Closing:
 
    
    Appointed Michael Carrazza as Board Chairman and Christopher Maher as President and CEO.
 
    
    Engaged KPMG as Patriots new auditor.
 
    
    Reduced non-performing assets by 76%. As of May 31, 2011 non-performing assets decreased
to $26 million, down from $106 million at the end of 2010.
 
    
    Right-sized the balance sheet; including an intentional shrinkage of total assets to
$670 million as of May 31, 2011.
 
    
    Reduced cost of deposits from 152 basis points to 113 basis points.
 
    
    Consolidated four branch locations creating a $1.7 million reduction in overhead costs
annually.
 
    
    Implemented further cost savings initiatives to reduce expenses by $1.0 million
annually.
 
    
    Redeployed over $50 million of excess liquidity into short-duration earning assets,
which will generate approximately $1.8 million in annual income.
 
    
    Executed a Bank-wide reduction in force producing a $1.3 million annual savings in
operations.
 
    
    Recruited several new seasoned professionals in lending, IT and finance.
 
    
    Re-launched lending efforts and built a strong pipeline of residential, commercial and
C&I business.
 
    
    Brought a three-year history of negative earnings to a near inflection point, which
should restore profitability soon.




---



##### 



About the Company
### §928. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter and the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title IV, §902, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 234; amended Pub. L. 90–618, title I, §102, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1226.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–618 reenacted section without change.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–618 effective Dec. 16, 1968, see section 105 of Pub. L. 90–618, set out as a note under section 921 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after June 19, 1968, see section 907 of Pub. L. 90–351, set out as a note under section 921 of this title.
### §1652. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §652, 46 Stat. 763.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §645, 42 Stat. 990. That section was superseded by section 652 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Customs Procedural Reform and Simplification Act of 1978

Pub. L. 95–410, title IV, §401, Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 905, provided that: "If any provision of this Act [see Short Title of 1978 Amendment note set out under section 1654 of this title], or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Act and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby."
437 P.2d 165

#### The STATE of New Mexico ex rel. Rudolph SCHNEIDER, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Paul TACKETT, District Judge, and the Second Judicial District of the State of New Mexico, in and for the County of Bernalillo, Respondent, and Paul G. Gibson and Grace Gibson, Real Party in Interest.

No. 8609.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 16, 1968.

NOBLE, MOISE and COMPTON, Justices, concurring; CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, having recused himself and CARMO-DY, Justice, being absent and not participating.

Ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
#### John W. Eighmy, Receiver, etc., Respondent, *v.*William C. Barker et al., Appellants.

(Submitted January 30, 1878;

decided February 12, 1878.)

*John C. Hulbert*for appellants.

*A. Pond*for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur except Andrews, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
### Part B—National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 681

 663

 739

 757

 570

 734

 767

 736

 730

 749

 726

 736

 743

 727

 728

 751

 765

 751

 775

 796

 792

 796

 820

 726

 814

 761

 730

 734

 759

 777

 785

 513

 513

 500

 543

 502

 574

 595

 583

 581

 580

 573

 572

 562

 593

 582

 567

 557

 532

 532

 521

 526

 592

 541

 536

 607

 568

 592

 594

 578

 573

 566

 570

 561

 589

 632

 531

 620

 659

 644

 632

 652

 633

 636

 619

 661

 637

 625

 621

 602

 634

 632

 607

 688

 655

 623

 689

 677

 659

 651

 638

 633

 636

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 368

 363

 380

 407

 344

 399

 423

 414

 407

 419

 407

 409

 399

 424

 410

 402

 400

 388

 408

 407

 391

 441

 421

 401

 442

 434

 423

 418

 410

 407

 409

TOTAL 19,546

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Adam
Jenn, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Canadian Minerals, Inc.
(formerly known as Barrington Foods International, Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





April 24,
2008








/s/ 
Adam
Jenn


Adam
Jenn


Chief
Executive Officer
#### § 19.78 Power of attorney.

An applicant or proprietor of a distilled spirits plant must execute and submit to the appropriate TTB officer form TTB F 5000.8, Power of Attorney, for each person authorized to sign or to act on behalf of the applicant or proprietor unless the authority has been granted in the application for registration.

(26 U.S.C. 5172)
#### Olga Shea, Appellant, v. Martin F. Shea et al., as Executors of William J. Shea, Deceased, Respondents.

No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.277 [Reserved]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 158 138 145

2 161 138 147

3 169 143 151

4 170 146 155

5 177 149 159

6 181 151 162

7 190 157 168

8 197 160 174

9 204 165 179

10 216 169 189

11 222 173 194

12 228 179 197

13 236 178 202

14 246 189 210

15 254 192 219

16 260 205 228

17 269 215 237

18 275 224 245

19 282 233 253

20 291 243 262

21 300 244 262

22 299 246 262

23 290 240 263

24 295 244 265

25 291 227 255

26 289 224 253

27 298 218 257

28 299 242 264

29 299 246 264

30 297 249 265

31 295 249 265

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Holland Tract On Old River 

Period: August 2023 Run Date: 10/11/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 440.90

 440.43

 442.37

 446.37

 447.51

 445.93

 444.39

 443.24

 441.53

 440.42

 439.90

 439.63

 439.22

 438.59

 438.36

 439.12

 439.51

 439.19

 439.27

 439.71

 440.15

 440.71

 441.10

 441.39

 441.74

 442.19

 442.83

 443.68

 444.95

 446.14

 715.0

 710.5

 729.3

 768.8

 780.2

 764.4

 749.1

 737.8

 721.1

 710.4

 705.4

 702.8

 698.9

 692.9

 690.7

 697.9

 701.7

 698.6

 699.4

 703.6

 707.8

 713.2

 717.0

 719.8

 723.2

 727.5

 733.8

 742.1

 754.7

 766.5

STORAGE

+4.8

-4.5

+18.8

+39.5

+11.4

-15.8

-15.3

-11.3

-16.7

-10.7

-5.0

-2.6

-3.9

-6.0

-2.2

+7.2

+3.7

-3.1

+0.8

+4.2

+4.2

+5.4

+3.8

+2.8

+3.4

+4.4

+6.2

+8.3

+12.5

+11.8

CHANGE

15,923

12,871

31,335

52,725

38,754

23,424

19,007

18,528

15,904

16,530

17,511

18,678

18,013

16,943

18,676

23,405

21,881

17,505

15,473

15,028

14,961

15,656

14,918

14,424

14,721

14,899

16,300

17,420

19,463

19,461

INFLOW

 8,089

 8,166

 8,249

 7,546

 7,832

 7,813

 7,752

 7,729

 8,218

 7,801

 7,833

 7,908

 7,752

 7,781

 7,794

 7,796

 7,730

 7,725

 7,606

 7,663

 7,523

 7,593

 7,597

 7,574

 7,524

 7,275

 7,477

 7,479

 7,454

 7,804

POWER

 5,297

 6,869

 13,499

 25,169

 25,050

 23,492

 18,826

 16,394

 15,966

 14,007

 12,092

 11,979

 12,131

 12,033

 11,844

 11,844

 12,157

 11,163

 7,312

 5,076

 5,141

 5,202

 5,261

 5,269

 5,341

 5,236

 5,453

 5,499

 5,443

 5,456

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 89

 90

 90

 89

 88

 91

 89

 85

 91

 98

 99

 94

 89

 89

 105

 97

 96

 97

 99

 99

 105

 109

 114

 115

 119

 117

 147

 151

 169

 181

PUMPING

 19

 29

 19

 7

 13

 17

 43

 26

 35

 32

 10

 0

 19

 66

 35

 22

 16

 64

 70

 67

 64

 32

 48

 48

 26

 65

 75

 88

 79

 50

C.F.S.

 .06

 .09

 .06

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .13

 .08

 .11

 .10

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .21

 .11

 .07

 .05

 .20

 .22

 .21

 .20

 .10

 .15

 .15

 .08

 .20

 .23

 .27

 .24

 .15

INCHES

 .87

 .02

 .51

 1.16

 1.20

 .25

 .00

 .34

 .01

 .06

 .47

 .27

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .87

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 9, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +56.1 590,337 232,083 325,501 0 3,191 1,184 3.67 6.19

ACRE-FEET +56,100 1,170,933 460,337 645,631 0 6,329 2,348

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 460,337

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 645,631

 6,329

TOTAL 1,112,297

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 32.77

 710.2

OUTLET 0 6.19

Table 11
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

 

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Sigma Designs, Inc.'s Registration Statement No. 33-8316 on Forms S-8 and S-3, Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-00883 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-48023 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-47835 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-33147 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-11779 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-77595 and Registration Statement No. 33-20226, 33-23699, 33-33571, 33-41330, 33-81914, 333-04041, 333-86875, 33-61549, 333-64234, 333-83126 and 333-103513, Registration Statement No. 333-107080, and 333-104442 on Form S-3, 333-706978 and 333-114374 on Form S-8, and Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-104442 on Form S-3, of our report dated April 9, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2004.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California