alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Bruce Robinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that theQuarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

| |                            | 
| | -------------------------- | 
| | Dated: February 9, 2007    | 
| |                            | 
| |                            | 
| | /s/ J. Bruce Robinson      | 
| | J. Bruce Robinson          | 
| | Chairman and               | 
| | Chief Executive Officer of | 
| | Zygo Corporation           | 

---
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.141 Barrels and kegs. ( a ) *General requirements.* The brewer's name or trade name and the place of production (city and, if necessary for identification, State) shall be permanently marked on each barrel or keg. If the place of production is clearly shown on the bung or on the tap cover, or on a label securely affixed to each barrel or keg, the place of production need not be permanently marked on each barrel or keg. No statement as to payment of internal revenue taxes may be shown.
( b ) *Breweries of same ownership.* ( 1 ) If two or more breweries are owned or operated by the same person, firm, or corporation (as defined in § 25.181), the place of production: ( i ) May be shown as the only location on the bung, or on the tap cover, or on a separate label attached to the keg;
( ii ) May be included in a listing of the locations of breweries qualified under this part if the place of production is not given less emphasis than any of the other locations; or
( iii ) Need not be shown if the brewer's principal place of business is shown in lieu of any other location. The brewer's principal place of business will be the location of a brewery operated by the brewer and qualified under this part.
( 2 ) If the location of two or more breweries is shown on the keg, bung, tap cover, or on a separate label attached to the keg (paragraph (b)(1)(ii)), or if the brewer's principal place of business is shown in lieu of the actual place of production (paragraph (b)(1)(iii)), the brewer shall indicate the actual place of production by printing, coding or other markings on the keg, bung, tap cover, or on a separate label attached to the keg. The coding system employed will permit an appropriate TTB officer to determine the place of production (including street address if two or more breweries are located in the same city) of the beer. The brewer must notify the appropriate TTB officer prior to employing a coding system.
( c ) *Label approval required.* Labels or tap covers used by brewers shall be covered by certificates of label approval, Form 5100.31, when required by part 7 of this chapter.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0474) (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1389, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5412))
[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. ATF-225, 51 FR 8492, Mar. 12, 1986; T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5479, Jan. 19, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.122 Application or notice, TTB Form 5100.11. ( a ) *Export, use on vessels and aircraft, transfer to a customs bonded warehouse, and transfer to a foreign-trade zone.* Where the exporter is not the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar from which the wine is to be withdrawn, the exporter must make an application on TTB Form 5100.11 for approval of the withdrawal. Where the exporter is the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar from which the wine is to be withdrawn, the exporter must, at the time of withdrawal of the wine, prepare a notice of the withdrawal and shipment on TTB Form 5100.11. TTB approval is not required if the exporter is the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar from which the wine is to be withdrawn.
( b ) *Manufacturing bonded warehouse.* The proprietor of the manufacturing bonded warehouse must make an application on TTB Form 5100.11 to withdraw wine without payment of tax for transportation to and deposit in such warehouse before withdrawal of the wine.
( c ) *Action by appropriate TTB officer.* Where, under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a TTB Form 5100.11 is submitted to the appropriate TTB officer for approval, the appropriate TTB officer shall, if satisfied that the application is in order and that the applicant has on file a good and sufficient bond, approve the application and forward it to the proprietor of the premises from which the wines are to be withdrawn.
( d ) *Restriction on shipment.* Where, under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, prior approval of TTB Form 5100.11 by the appropriate TTB officer is required, the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar may not ship the wine until the approved TTB Forms 5100.11 have been received by him. In such cases, the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar shall, on removal of the wines, execute his certificate of removal on TTB Form 5100.11.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1380, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5362)) [T.D. ATF-198, 50 FR 8560, Mar. 1, 1985] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 28.122, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
#### § 19.602 Redistillation records.

If a proprietor redistills spirits in the processing account (as in the production of gin or vodka by redistillation), the proprietor must prepare a record of the redistillation. The record must show the kind and quantity of the spirits entered into the distilling system and the kind and quantity of the spirits removed from the distilling system upon completion of the process.

(26 U.S.C. 5207)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,415

 1,285

 1,003

 875

 913

 1,052

 1,195

 1,092

 1,289

 1,540

 1,984

 2,546

 3,033

 3,151

 3,151

 3,249

 2,544

 1,915

 1,767

 1,550

 1,196

 1,275

 1,749

 1,794

 2,263

 2,340

 2,922

 3,306

 3,290

 3,147

 2,896

 439

 439

 427

 434

 454

 490

 488

 493

 512

 557

 613

 683

 703

 746

 756

 759

 698

 676

 695

 577

 652

 664

 685

 715

 738

 758

 778

 845

 867

 862

 868

 668

 683

 614

 584

 618

 674

 658

 650

 734

 827

 976

 1,198

 1,407

 1,523

 1,553

 1,554

 1,410

 1,158

 1,131

 945

 865

 858

 945

 983

 1,092

 1,170

 1,302

 1,483

 1,540

 1,508

 1,513

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 6,613

 6,863

 7,022

 7,170

 7,363

 7,612

 7,868

 8,100

 8,400

 8,773

 9,273

 9,995

 10,885

 11,814

 12,699

 13,570

 14,366

 14,940

 15,453

 15,724

 15,931

 16,139

 16,350

 16,506

 16,622

 16,594

 16,489

 16,449

 16,436

 16,390

 16,493

 472

 490

 502

 512

 526

 544

 562

 579

 600

 627

 662

 714

 778

 844

 907

 969

 1,026

 1,067

 1,104

 1,123

 1,138

 1,153

 1,168

 1,179

 1,187

 1,185

 1,178

 1,175

 1,174

 1,171

 1,178

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 19.169 Effect of failure to furnish a superseding bond or a new bond. ( a ) *Operations bond.* Except as provided in § 19.151(d), a person may not operate a distilled spirits plant without an operations bond. A person who does not submit an acceptable superseding operations bond when required to do so under § 19.168(a) must immediately discontinue the activities to which the lapsed bond coverage relates upon lapse of the existing bond coverage. If a proprietor must furnish an operations bond under § 19.168(b)(1) and does not submit an operations bond within the time prescribed in § 19.168(b)(2), the proprietor must immediately discontinue the activities required to be covered by the operations bond.
( b ) *Withdrawal bond.* Except as provided in § 19.151(d), a person may not defer payment of taxes on spirits withdrawn from a distilled spirits plant upon determination of tax without a withdrawal bond. If a person is required to submit a new or superseding withdrawal bond under § 19.168, the person must submit the bond in accordance with that section. A person who does not submit and receive approval of an acceptable withdrawal bond when required to do so under § 19.168 may not withdraw distilled spirits from the bonded premises on a deferred basis. Upon lapse of the existing bond coverage, or upon the date a new bond is required under § 19.168(b), the person must pay the tax at the time of withdrawal, except in the case of distilled spirits withdrawn free of tax or withdrawn without payment of tax under 26 U.S.C. 5214 or withdrawn exempt from tax under 26 U.S.C. 7510.
( c ) *Unit bond.* A person who does not provide an acceptable superseding unit bond when required to do so under § 19.168 must immediately discontinue the business or distilled spirits operations to which the lapsed bond coverage relates. Upon lapse of the existing bond coverage the person must also pay the tax at the time of withdrawal, except in the case of distilled spirits withdrawn free of tax or withdrawn without payment of tax under 26 U.S.C. 5214 or withdrawn exempt from tax under 26 U.S.C. 7510.
(26 U.S.C. 5173, 5175, 5176)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1121, Jan. 4, 2017]
#### § 19.234 Filing deferred payment returns.

A proprietor must pay the tax on spirits withdrawn from bond for deferred payment of tax by filing a return on form TTB F 5000.24, Excise Tax Return. The proprietor must execute and file TTB F 5000.24 for each return period, even when no tax is due for a particular return period. The proprietor of each bonded premises must pay the full amount of distilled spirits tax determined for all spirits released for withdrawal from the bonded premises on determination of tax during the period covered by the return (except spirits on which tax has been prepaid).

(26 U.S.C. 5061)
Kumar Venkataraman

Professor of Finance, Cox School of Business

Southern Methodist University

SEC FIMSAC: BBB Market for Corporate Credit in 2020
Fallen Angels point to heightened credit stress

2

Record downgrades:

Jan – July 2020: $329 B

Forecast for 2020: $640 B

Ratio of BBB non-financial 

downgrades to outstanding BBB 

non-financials:

June 2019: 1.3%

June 2020: 4.5%

Source: S&P Global Ratings Report (Credit Trends: BBB Pulse), Aug 27, 2020
Abundant liquidity for corporate issuers

3

Corporate Bond issuances

Record issuances in the 

second quarter of 2020.

Revolving credit facilities

Either fully or partially drawn 

in record numbers by US 

corporations.

Source: S&P Global Ratings Report (Credit Trends: BBB Pulse), Aug 27, 2020
Fed Reserve’s liquidity facility calmed the market

4

Source: S&P Global Ratings Report (Credit Trends: BBB Pulse), Aug 27, 2020
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER/PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)

I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr. certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARDL. EHLER, JR.    
| | Howard L. Ehler, Jr.       
| | Chief Operating Officer/   
| | Principal Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

#### § 28.281 Certificate of use for distilled spirits and wines.

When all of the distilled spirits or wines represented by a single application, notice, or claim, TTB Form 5100.11, 5110.30, or 1582-A (5120.24), as the case may be, have been withdrawn from customs custody and laden and used on aircraft, the airline shall prepare a certificate of use on which are itemized all the requisitions pertaining to such distilled spirits or wines. The certificate shall be executed under the penalties of perjury by an officer of the airline and shall show the name of the exporter, the entry number, the brand and kind of distilled spirits or wines, and the number of bottles to be accounted for; and, as to each requisition, the requisition (or kit) number, the date laden, the registry number of the aircraft, the country for which the aircraft was cleared, and the number of bottles used. When completed, the certificate shall be presented to the customs officer at the airport who shall then execute his certificate on both copies of the appropriate application, notice, or claim, TTB Form 5100.11, 5110.30, or 1582-A (5120.24), as the case may be, noting thereon any exception, such as shortages or breakage. The customs officer shall then attach the certificate of use to the copy of the appropriate form and forward both copies of the form to the district director of customs.

(46 Stat. 690, as amended, 72 Stat. 1336, 1362, 1380; 19 U.S.C. 1309, 26 U.S.C. 5062, 5214, 5362)

[25 FR 5734, June 23, 1960. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting § 28.281, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
#### City of Omaha v. Luther A. Harmon.

Filed March 22, 1899.

No. 8779.

1. Taxation: Enforcement: Construction op Statute. When the law imposing a tax provides a special remedy for enforcing it, the method so provided is generally exclusive, and if the only method adopted be illeg-al, the courts cannot substitute a different and legal method. Following *German-American Fire Ins. Co. v. Minden,*51 Neb. 870.

2. Municipal Corporation: Occupation Tax: Void Ordinance. A city ordinance imposed an occupation tax and provided only an illegal method for its enforcement. *Hell,*That the whole ordinance was thereby rendered inoperative. Following *German-American Fire Ins. Co. v. Minden,*51 Neb. 870.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.

*Affirmed.*

*W. J. Connell*and *Lee S. Estelle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Congdon & Parish, contra.*

Ryan, C.

In this case Luther A. Harmon recovered judgment for the amount of taxes by himself and his assignors paid the city of Omaha under protest. The ordinance, in compliance with the provisions of which these payments were made, was entitled “An ordinance to permit and regulate coal dealers in the city of Omaha and to repeal 'General Ordinance No. 1991.” In the ordinance entitled as above every firm, person, or corporation was required, before engaging in the sale of coal, to pay a permit fee each, year of $100. The failure to comply with the requirements of the ordinance subjected the offender to a fine of not less than five nor more than one hundred dollars for each offense.

The questions presented by the record were fully considered and determined in *German-American Fire Ins. Co. v. Minden,*51 Neb. 870. It is therefore unnecessary for *340us at this time to do more than restate the conclusions therein announced, and this restatement we shall make by quoting the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the syllabus, as follows:

“4. When the law imposing a tax provides a special means for enforcing it, the method so provided is generally exclusive, and if the only method adopted be illegal, the courts cannot substitute a different and legal method.

“5. A city ordinance imposed an occupation tax, and provided only an illegal method for its enforcement. *Held,*That the whole ordinance was thereby rendered inoperative.”

From the same application of these principles as was made in the case cited it results that the ordinance requiring the payment of this tax was invalid, and the judgment of the district court rendered on that theory is

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.199 Application and permit to ship, TTB Form 5110.31.

Before spirits of Puerto Rican manufacture may be shipped to the United States without payment of tax for withdrawal from customs custody and transfer to the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant, an application by the consignor on TTB Form 5110.31 for permit to ship must be approved by the Secretary. All copies of the application (original and five copies) shall be delivered to the revenue agent.

[T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71714, Dec. 11, 1979, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1134, Jan. 4, 2017]
#### § 24.115 Registry number.

Upon approval of the application, the appropriate TTB officer will assign a registry number to the bonded winery, bonded wine cellar, or taxpaid wine bottling house. The registry number will be used in all correspondence and on all documents filed subsequently in connection with the operation of the premises and will be shown where required on labels and markings of containers or cases filled at the wine premises.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0058 and 1512-0503)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Your Domain.Com (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

August13, 2004
477 P.2d 833

#### Louis MADRID, Petitioner, v. Hon. D. A. MACPHERSON, Jr., Respondent.

No. 9179.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 21, 1970.

Original Prohibition Proceeding

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition issued herein on December 11, 1970 be and the same is hereby made permanent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 108

 108

 112

 110

 113

 112

 112

 115

 109

 109

 109

 110

 106

 107

 106

 111

 111

 113

 114

 116

 116

 117

 117

 117

 124

 132

 136

 138

 143

 155

 85

 77

 96

 88

 81

 94

 78

 80

 93

 82

 89

 92

 78

 81

 95

 91

 82

 92

 94

 86

 96

 88

 99

 92

 106

 114

 122

 125

 129

 140

 103

 102

 106

 104

 102

 104

 105

 103

 105

 102

 101

 103

 101

 101

 102

 106

 102

 108

 108

 112

 110

 110

 110

 111

 119

 125

 131

 134

 138

 145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH