alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5434

    To amend the Clean Air Act to provide an exemption from certain 
  antitampering provisions for certain actions for modifying a motor 
 vehicle that is not legal for operation on a street or highway and is 
       to be used solely for competition, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2019

   Mr. McHenry (for himself, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Schrader, Mr. 
 Posey, Mr. Cisneros, and Mr. Burgess) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Clean Air Act to provide an exemption from certain 
  antitampering provisions for certain actions for modifying a motor 
 vehicle that is not legal for operation on a street or highway and is 
       to be used solely for competition, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recognizing the Protection of 
Motorsports Act of 2019'' or the ``RPM Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM ANTITAMPERING PROVISIONS.

    Section 203(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7522(a)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``No action with respect to any 
device or element of design referred to in paragraph (3) shall be 
treated as a prohibited act under that paragraph if the action is for 
the purpose of modifying a motor vehicle into a vehicle that is not 
legal for operation on a street or highway and is to be used solely for 
competition.''.

SEC. 3. REGULATION.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall finalize a 
regulation to implement the amendment made by this Act.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 2 shall take effect not later than one year after the date 
of enactment of this Act without regard to whether a final regulation 
has been promulgated as required by section 3.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5490 

To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 

estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit and of the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. STEWART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an estimate of the cost per 

taxpayer of the deficit and of the public debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT IN BUDGET SUBMISSION WITH 

4 RESPECT TO THE COST PER TAXPAYER OF 

5 THE DEFICIT. 

6 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5490 IH

1 ‘‘(40)(A) in the case of a fiscal year in which 

2 the budget is projected to result in a deficit, an esti3 mate of the pro rata cost of such deficit for tax4 payers who will file individual income tax returns for 

5 taxable years ending during such fiscal year; and 

6 ‘‘(B) in the case of any fiscal year, an estimate 

7 of the pro rata cost of the public debt for taxpayers 

8 who will file individual income tax returns for tax9 able years ending during such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Filed 7/16/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 120

Mark Lithun and Marie Lithun, Petitioners and Appellees

v.

Michael O. DuPaul, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20020008

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable William W. McLees, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leslie Bakken Oliver, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for petitioners and appellees.

Michael O. DuPaul, pro se, Box 932, Minot, N.D. 58702.

Lithun v. DuPaul

No. 20020008

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Michael O. DuPaul appealed from a district court order granting Mark and Marie Lithuns’ petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01.  We affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Dale V. Sandstrom

Georgia Dawson, D.J.

[¶3]The Honorable Georgia Dawson, D.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 400.22

 400.33

 400.24

 400.21

 400.01

 399.90

 399.70

 399.51

 399.26

 398.94

 398.78

 398.89

 398.94

 398.71

 398.55

 398.25

 397.94

 397.65

 397.35

 397.06

 396.77

 396.38

 395.98

 395.82

 395.67

 395.47

 395.30

 395.14

 394.92

 394.66

 380.9

 381.6

 381.0

 380.8

 379.5

 378.8

 377.4

 376.2

 374.5

 372.4

 371.4

 372.1

 372.4

 370.9

 369.9

 367.9

 365.9

 364.0

 362.1

 360.2

 358.3

 355.9

 353.3

 352.3

 351.3

 350.1

 349.0

 348.0

 346.6

 345.0

STORAGE

-0.1

+0.7

-0.6

-0.2

-1.3

-0.7

-1.3

-1.3

-1.7

-2.1

-1.0

+0.7

+0.3

-1.5

-1.0

-2.0

-2.0

-1.9

-1.9

-1.9

-1.9

-2.5

-2.6

-1.0

-0.9

-1.3

-1.1

-1.0

-1.4

-1.6

CHANGE

1,606

1,983

1,282

1,490

949

1,211

1,040

957

777

618

952

1,810

1,694

1,182

1,079

694

686

670

517

613

552

300

511

706

930

850

1,071

920

683

543

INFLOW

 1,448

 1,382

 1,363

 1,378

 1,416

 1,369

 1,484

 1,363

 1,392

 1,467

 1,263

 1,226

 1,306

 1,709

 1,385

 1,461

 1,499

 1,416

 1,306

 1,375

 1,416

 1,438

 1,650

 1,037

 1,265

 1,349

 1,454

 1,287

 1,231

 1,197

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 174

 178

 177

 168

 166

 169

 175

 179

 170

 167

 170

 169

 170

 177

 177

 173

 164

 157

 151

 152

 38

 86

 143

 141

 130

 108

 116

 125

 125

 131

PUMPING

 52

 52

 45

 45

 40

 40

 47

 47

 47

 47

 46

 53

 53

 53

 44

 48

 42

 41

 37

 30

 35

 32

 6

 38

 13

 30

 42

 17

 25

 34

C.F.S.

 .23

 .23

 .20

 .20

 .18

 .18

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .20

 .22

 .19

 .19

 .17

 .14

 .16

 .15

 .03

 .18

 .06

 .14

 .20

 .08

 .12

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -36.1 28,876 41,332 0 0 4,526 1,181 5.38 .63

ACRE-FEET -36,100 57,276 81,982 0 0 8,977 2,343

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 81,982

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 8,977

TOTAL 90,959

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = .63

 381.0

OUTLET 0 .63
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2019

No. 04-18-00721-CV

HARVEY V. RISIEN, LLC and Harvey V. Risien,

Appellants

v.

MISSARK INVESTMENTS GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP 

Management, LLC,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15535

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The parties have filed a Joint Advisory Regarding Abatement of Appeal informing the 

court that they require a continuation of the abatement of appellate proceedings for an additional 

two weeks to finalize their settlement agreement. We ORDER this appeal ABATED until March 

4, 2019 to permit the parties to finalize their settlement agreement. All appellate deadlines are 

suspended until March 4, 2019. After March 4, 2019, either appellants, or the parties jointly, 

must file a motion to dismiss the appeal due to settlement, or if the settlement is not finalized, a 

motion to reinstate the appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §1303. Postmaster or employee as lottery agent 1

Whoever, being an officer or employee of the Postal Service, acts as agent for any lottery office, or under color of purchase or otherwise, vends lottery tickets, or knowingly sends by mail or delivers any letter, package, postal card, circular, or pamphlet advertising any lottery, gift enterprise, or similar scheme, offering prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance, or any ticket, certificate, or instrument representing any chance, share, or interest in or dependent upon the event of any lottery, gift enterprise, or similar scheme offering prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance, or any list of the prizes awarded by means of any such scheme, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(10), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18 U.S.C., 1940 ed., §337 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §214, 35 Stat. 1130). Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $100".

1970—Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "an officer or employee of the Postal Service" for "a postmaster or other person employed in the Postal Service".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established thereby by the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service and published by it in the Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.

1 Section catchline was not amended to conform to change made in the text by Pub. L. 91–375.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting change.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces an agenda change for the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The meeting has been consolidated into one day. This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives Program at                         *era.program@nara.gov*. This meeting will be recorded for transcription purposes.                    

# DATES:

This meeting will be held on April 6, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles Piercy, Acting Assistant Archivist for the Office of Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740, (301) 837-1583.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

(1) Opening Remarks

(2) ERA Status Updates

(3) Subcommittee Breakouts

(4) Adjournment

Dated: March 31, 2011.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-8215 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Kent, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    MARK
KENT                     
|    |  | Mark Kent                            
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: April 20, 2007
#### Paul P. Harris et al. *v.*George Novotasky

*Snow G. Munford,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Harvey A. Katz,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued October 6

decided October 6, 1970

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 900

 943

 930

 899

 897

 941

 925

 863

 768

 709

 671

 627

 544

 507

 454

 442

 434

 406

 381

 375

 374

 364

 326

 316

 314

 316

 319

 321

 333

 340

 337

 610

 641

 710

 707

 665

 668

 624

 588

 569

 530

 513

 415

 402

 392

 356

 335

 316

 320

 323

 289

 312

 297

 297

 298

 279

 287

 270

 271

 264

 272

 265

 710

 778

 784

 773

 762

 759

 723

 674

 635

 589

 555

 519

 472

 437

 398

 375

 369

 360

 338

 326

 327

 318

 310

 303

 297

 297

 293

 289

 295

 295

 293

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                                330 E. Warm Springs
                                                Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                       702.528.1984
                                                425.928.2877 (efax)





October 23, 2000


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my
report  of October 23, 2000, on the Financial Statements of  Future
Carz.com,  Inc.  for  the  three  and  nine  month  periods  ending
September  30, 2000, in any filings which are necessary now  or  in
the  near  future to be filed with the US Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.

Signed,

/s/G. Brad Beckstead, CPA

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
(No. 5547

#### Holiday Inns of America, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 19, 1973.*

M. Hue Smith, III, Attorney for Claimant.

*20William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINDINGS AND OBJECTIVES
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Eulogia Marquez

*Samuel Bailey, Jr.,*in support of the petition.

Submitted December 11, 1970

decided January 7, 1971

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                           CONSENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP,
                  INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of RadNet, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 17, 2007,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of RadNet, Inc. and subsidiaries for the two month period ended
December 31, 2006, and for the year ended October 31, 2006, included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

o        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-61876) pertaining to the
         2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Primedex Health Systems, Inc.;

o        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-143652) pertaining to the
         2006 Equity Incentive Plan of RadNet, Inc.; and

o        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-153228) pertaining to 2006
         Equity Incentive Plan of RadNet, Inc.; the Warrant To Purchase Shares
         Of Common Stock between RadNet, inc. and Derek Bomar, dated January 8,
         2007, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex
         Health Systems, Inc. ("Primedex") and Derek Bomar, dated October 20,
         2005, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex
         and June W. Chen, dated March 14, 2006, the Warrant To Purchase Shares
         Of Common Stock between Primedex and John V. Crues, dated June 7, 2005,
         the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and
         Lawrence L. Levitt, dated March 28, 2006, the Warrant To Purchase
         Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and Lawrence L. Levitt, dated
         March 14, 2005, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between
         Primedex and Jeffrey L. Linden, dated April 28, 2006, the Warrant To
         Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and Judith G. Rose,
         dated June 7, 2005, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock
         between Primedex and Mark Stolper, dated July 30, 2004, the Warrant To
         Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and Mark Stolper,
         dated July 30, 2004, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock
         between Primedex and Mark Stolper, dated March 1, 2004, the Warrant To
         Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and Mark Stolper,
         dated July 11, 2006, the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock
         between Primedex and David L. Swartz, dated March 28, 2006, the Warrant
         To Purchase Shares Of Common Stock between Primedex and David L.
         Schwartz, dated July 8, 2005, and the Warrant To Purchase Shares Of
         Common Stock between Primedex and David L. Schwartz, dated March 1,
         2004.


                               /s/ Moss Adams LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 16, 2009
### subpart 3—federal supplemental educational opportunity grants

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, §§402(a)(2), 403(a), July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 482, 505, redesignated subpart 2 as 3 and inserted "Federal" before "Supplemental" in heading and redesignated former subpart 3 as 4.
(No. 6752

#### Marcus L. Kogan, D.P.M., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 25, 1973.*

Dr. Marcus L. Kogan, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit  32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In connection with the report  of  InterCare DX,  Inc.  (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on    the   date  hereof  (the  "Report"),
we,  Anthony  C.  Dike,  the  Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant   to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted pursuant to  Section 906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of  Section  13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided to
InterCare DX,  Inc.,  and  will  be  retained   by   InterCare DX,  Inc.,  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: November 20, 2007         By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO
                               (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
#### § 84.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 84.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 84.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) The performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) The performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) You believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the ED awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)