alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.106 Clinics.

Tax-free alcohol withdrawn by clinics operated for charity and not for profit shall be used only for medicinal, scientific, and mechanical purposes and in the treatment of patients. Medicine compounded with tax-free alcohol may be dispensed to patients for use off the premises, if the furnishing of the medicine is not conditioned upon payment. A separate charge may be made for medicine coumpounded on the clinic premises with tax-free alcohol for use of patients on the premises. Except as provided in this section and in § 22.102, the use of tax-free alcohol shall be confined strictly to the premises of the clinic.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214))
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.68a Bond account.

Every person who files a bond under this subpart shall keep an account of the charges against and credits to the bond if the penal sum of his bond is less than the maximum prescribed in §§ 26.66(a), 26.67, or § 26.68, or if the penal sum allocated to his premises under § 26.66(b) is less than the prescribed maximum. He shall charge the bond with the amount of liability he accepts at the time he executes TTB Form 5110.51 or 5100.21, and shall credit the bond with the amount of the tax paid at the time he files each return, and remittance. The account shall also show the balance available under the bond at any one time.

[T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71710, Dec. 11, 1979. Redesignated and amended by T.D. ATF-459, 66 FR 38550, 38551, July 25, 2001; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1131, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 373

 368

 347

 348

 344

 346

 343

 339

 340

 338

 350

 351

 347

 352

 368

 366

 369

 369

 369

 355

 346

 329

 322

 311

 299

 280

 291

 318

 323

 320

 317

 314

 310

 299

 289

 293

 292

 293

 297

 302

 298

 311

 313

 313

 297

 287

 277

 277

 256

 254

 262

 258

 238

 234

 238

 253

 345

 338

 330

 326

 320

 315

 311

 311

 312

 316

 328

 329

 326

 328

 331

 332

 328

 324

 319

 315

 301

 286

 289

 279

 271

 257

 262

 276

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 254

 251

 251

 244

 254

 246

 237

 230

 225

 227

 224

 226

 225

 228

 225

 224

 225

 225

 223

 229

 249

 270

 273

 290

 341

 249

 228

 230

 235

 242

 264

 244

 235

 232

 229

 227

 224

 220

 220

 218

 214

 214

 215

 210

 213

 215

 215

 214

 212

 206

 211

 212

 213

 213

 215

 217

 214

 217

 216

 215

 213

 213

 250

 245

 241

 236

 234

 231

 228

 224

 221

 219

 219

 219

 218

 219

 220

 219

 218

 217

 216

 217

 220

 225

 227

 231

 245

 224

 221

 220

 219

 220

 224

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,582

 3,578

 3,566

 3,546

 3,524

 3,499

 3,473

 3,437

 3,398

 3,359

 3,319

 3,279

 3,239

 3,204

 3,174

 3,148

 3,125

 3,106

 3,088

 3,074

 3,066

 3,067

 3,073

 3,085

 3,111

 3,116

 3,119

 3,120

 3,119

 3,120

 3,126

 256

 256

 255

 253

 252

 250

 248

 246

 243

 240

 237

 234

 231

 229

 227

 225

 223

 222

 221

 220

 219

 219

 220

 220

 222

 223

 223

 223

 223

 223

 223

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
E - 17
Exhibit No. 6
Prestige Captial Corporation
Form 10-K
File No. 33-3583-S

                        PROMISSORY NOTE (Interest)

               January 27, 1999

The  undersigned, jointly and severally, promise to pay to  the  order  of

GLEN ULMER

at   2508  SOUTH 1300 EAST     in  SALT LAKE CITY  , Utah, or at such other

place as the holder hereof may designate

in   writing,   the  sum  of     TWENTY   THOUSAND  AND   N0/100   DOLLARS

dollars   ($ 20,000.00)  , payable as follows:

               ON DEMAND

Together  both  before  and after judgment, with interest  on  the  unpaid
balance thereof from date until paid at the rate of eight per cent  (-8-%)
per annum, interest payable as follows:

               ON DUE DATE OF THIS NOTE

  Prepayment of this note with interest to date of payment may be made  at

  any time without penalty.

  If  the holder deems itself insecure or if default be made in payment of
the  whole  or any part of any installment at the time when or  the  place
where  the  same  becomes due and payable as aforesaid,  then  the  entire
unpaid balance, with interest as aforesaid, shall, at the election of  the
holder  hereof and without notice of said election at once become due  and
payable.  In  event of any such default or acceleration, the  undersigned,
jointly  and  severally,  agree  to pay to the  holder  hereof  reasonable
attorney's fees, legal expenses and lawful collection costs in addition to
all other sums due hereunder.

  Presentment, demand, protest, notice of dishonor and extension  of  time
without  notice  are  hereby  waived and the undersigned  consent  to  the
release   of   any  security,  or  any  part  thereof,  with  or   without
substitution.
                              PRESTIGE CAPITAL CORPORATION

Address:                      By:  /s/ PAUL W. NIELSON
                              Its   PRESIDENT

                             E-17
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001103721
<NAME>                        Pizza Group, Inc. #1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,850
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,850
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       565
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,850
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 23-0369 

IN THE MA.TTER OF: 

J.S. 

Respondent and Appellant. 

GRANT 

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 10, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief. 

09/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0369
#### Acme Ribbon Mills, Inc. v. City of New York.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### Nathaniel McKay, Appellant, *v.*John G. Barnes, Respondent.

(Argued February 1, 1878;

decided February 12, 1878.)

*Nathaniel C. Moak*for appellant.

*612
      *John Hubbell*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion of court below. All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
(No. 74-CC-27

#### Mount Shelter Care Home, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Mount Shelter Care Home, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Anna T. Eyclesheimer, Plaintiff, *v.*Henry F. Hunter, Defendant.

Second Department,

May 29, 1914.

Real property—-will — vested remainder.

Where a testator, without legal education or experience, draws a will, leaving his property to his wife for life, with a remainder to his two children “or their heirs,” the words quoted are to he construed with reference to the death of the testator, and the remainders are vested.

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

*Bayard L. Peck [John T. Hancock*with him on the brief], for the plaintiff.

D. *A. Marsh [George D. Yeomans*with him on the brief], for the defendant.

Per Curiam:

This is a submitted controversy wherein plaintiff seeks specific performance of contract for the conveyance of realty. The sole question of law is whether the remainders constituted in the will of Peter D. Eyclesheimer are vested or contingent. The provision up for construction reads as follows: “I, Peter D. Eyclesheimer of Winter Haven Polk County and State of Florida, a farmer being of a sound mind, make this my last will. I give devise and bequeath my estate and property, real and personal that is or may be now or shall hereafter come to be mine before or after my death to my beloved wife Anna T. *644Eyclesheimer for her own use and benefit as long as she shall live after which time it shall be equally divided, share and share alike between our two children Clarence M. Eyclesheimer and Mrs. C. F. Greenwood — nee— Hattie Eyclesheimer or their heirs.” The testator was and always had been a farmer, of no legal education or experience, and personally drew the will without legal advice.

We think that the remainders are vested. The expression “ or their heirs ” is to he construed with reference to the death of the testator. *(Moore*v. *Lyons,*25 Wend. 119; *Connelly*v. *O’Brien,*166 N. Y. 406; *Hersee*v. *Simpson,*154 id. 496; *Stokes*v. *Weston,*142 id. 433; *Campbell*v. *Stokes,*Id. 23; *Lewis*v. *Howe,*174 id. 340, 346; *Riker*v. *Gwynne,*201 id. 150; *Miller*v. *Gilbert,*144 id. 68.) The defendant should be required to perform. *(Ebling*v. *Dreyer,*149 N. Y. 460.)

The judgment should he in favor of the plaintiff, without costs, in accord with the terms of the submission.

Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Judgment for plaintiff, without costs, in accord with the terms of the submission.
§ 24.304 Chaptalization (Brix adjustment) and amelioration record. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor who chaptalizes juice or ameliorates juice or wine, or both, shall maintain a record of the operation and the transaction date. Records will be maintained for each kind of wine produced (grape, apple, strawberry, etc.). No form of record is prescribed, but the record maintained will contain the information necessary to enable appropriate TTB officers to readily determine compliance with chaptalization and amelioration limitations. All quantities will be recorded in wine gallons, and, where sugar is used, the quantity will be determined either by measuring the increase in volume or, for pure dry sugar by considering that each 13.5 pounds results in a volumetric increase of one gallon. If grape juice is chaptalized and subsequently this juice or wine is ameliorated, the quantity of pure dry sugar added to juice will be included as ameliorating material. If fruit juice other than grape is chaptalized and this juice or wine is ameliorated, the quantity of pure dry sugar added for chaptalization is not considered ameliorating material; however, if liquid sugar or invert sugar syrup is used, the quantity of water in such sugar is included as ameliorating material. The record will include the following: ( 1 ) The volume of juice (exclusive of pulp) deposited in fermenters;
( 2 ) The maximum volume of ameliorating material to which the juice is entitled, as provided in § 24.178;
( 3 ) The volume of ameliorating or chaptalizing material used; and
( 4 ) The volume of material authorized but not yet used.
( b ) *Supporting records.* The amelioration record will show the basis for entries and calculations, including determination of the natural fixed acid level and total solids content of juice, as applicable. The records are maintained on the basis of annual accounting periods, with each period commencing on July 1 of a year and ending on the following June 30, except the record for an accounting period may be continued after June 30, where the juice or wine included therein is to be held after that date for completion. When the amelioration of wine included in the record for one accounting period is complete, the record is closed and any unused ameliorating material may not be used. The proprietor may mix wines before amelioration of the wine is completed; however, the proprietor shall additionally maintain records necessary to establish the quantity of unused authorized material to which the resultant mixture would be entitled so that appropriate TTB officers may readily ascertain compliance with amelioration limitations.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended 1385, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367, 5384))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0298) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31082, July 9, 1991; T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13684, Mar. 22, 1999]
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, the shareholders of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the ITT Educational Services, Inc. Amended and
Restated 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) on May 7, 2013; 
 WHEREAS, on October 20, 2014, the Board of
Directors of the Company amended the Plan in certain respects that did not require shareholder approval; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company now desires to further amend the Plan in certain respects that do not require shareholder approval. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Subsection 7(e) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

 (e)
Vesting of Options. Options granted under this Section 7 will be exercisable at such times (based on the passage of time or the achievement of Performance Measures) and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as set forth in the
Award Agreement, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant; provided, however, that, except as otherwise provided upon a termination of employment or service or pursuant to Section 20 in the event of a Change in Control
or Subsidiary Disposition, no Option may be exercisable prior to one (1) year from the date of grant, unless the Committee determines otherwise. 
  

	 	2.	This Second Amendment to the Plan shall become effective upon its adoption by the Board of Directors of the Company. 


Adopted by the Board of Directors of ITT 

Educational Services, Inc. on May 22, 2015
#### John F. Krumme, Jr., by His Guardian ad Litem, John F. Krumme, Plaintiff, and John F. Krumme, Respondent, v. Cushman’s Sons, Inc., Appellant, and Nicholas Fazzolari, Appellant-Respondent.

This is an action sounding in negligence, brought by an infant plaintiff for personal injuries, and by his father for medical expenses and loss of services. The appeal is from a judgment, entered upon the verdict of the jury, awarding plaintiff father, John Fred Krumme, the sum of $456.80, against both defendants. The judgment also set aside the verdict for the infant plaintiff, John Fred Krumme, Jr., in the sum of $500, as inadequate, and directed a new trial as to such plaintiff, and dismissed the cross complaint of defendant Cushman’s Sons, Inc., against Nicholas Fazzolari. Judgment modified on the law and the facts, by striking out the third decretal paragraph and substituting therefor the following: “Adjudged that defendant Cushman’s Sons, Inc., do recover of defendant Nicholas Fazzolari the sum of $456.80 on its cross-complaint, and that defendant Cushman’s Sons, Inc., have execution therefor.” As so modified, the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, with costs in favor of plaintiff John Fred Krumme against defendants. Defendant Fazzolari was the active wrongdoer, and defendant Cushman’s Sons, Inc., was guilty only of passive negligence. *(Scott*v. *Curtis,*195 N. Y. 424.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
### §2113. Overall negotiating objective

The overall United States negotiating objective under sections 2111 and 2112 of this title shall be to obtain more open and equitable market access and the harmonization, reduction, or elimination of devices which distort trade or commerce. To the maximum extent feasible, the harmonization, reduction, or elimination of agricultural trade barriers and distortions shall be undertaken in conjunction with the harmonization, reduction, or elimination of industrial trade barriers and distortions.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §103, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1984.)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesM. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James M. Spiezio    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James  M. Spiezio        |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| May 11, 2009        |   |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 20B—GALLAUDET COLLEGE**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 500.61

 500.92

 501.10

 501.27

 501.66

 501.99

 502.45

 503.14

 503.33

 503.82

 504.12

 504.41

 504.58

 504.58

 504.45

 504.10

 503.87

 503.74

 503.49

 503.26

 503.26

 503.26

 502.95

 502.59

 502.35

 502.13

 501.78

 501.43

 501.04

 500.34

 1,514,685

 1,518,248

 1,520,318

 1,522,275

 1,526,766

 1,530,570

 1,535,877

 1,543,850

 1,546,048

 1,551,721

 1,555,198

 1,558,562

 1,560,535

 1,560,535

 1,559,026

 1,554,966

 1,552,301

 1,550,795

 1,547,900

 1,545,238

 1,545,238

 1,545,238

 1,541,653

 1,537,494

 1,534,723

 1,532,184

 1,528,149

 1,524,117

 1,519,628

 1,511,583

 4,041

 4,625

 2,324

 2,322

 2,298

 2,277

 3,951

 5,813

 2,292

 3,523

 3,483

 3,479

 2,274

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,328

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,345

 1,316

 2,766

 2,624

 0

 0

 3,901

 2,593

 2,602

 1,323

 2,611

 3,287

 1,312

 4,041

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL June 4, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2020 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 229 29,721 7,022 23,618

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 3,331

 3,563

 2,070

 1,957

 4,491

 3,804

 5,307

 7,973

 2,198

 5,673

 3,477

 3,364

 1,973

 0

-1,509

-4,060

-2,665

-1,506

-2,895

-2,662

 0

 0

-3,585

-4,159

-2,771

-2,539

-4,035

-4,032

-4,489

-8,045

 218

 226

 224

 219

 156

 151

 142

 149

 145

 172

 188

 200

 203

 251

 232

 230

 234

 229

 240

 268

 249

 244

 260

 277

 290

 277

 290

 322

 348

 388

4,030

5,874

5,019

4,969

4,490

4,733

3,481

7,935

4,594

3,198

3,295

3,242

1,956

-138

-233

-236

-1,602

-1,542

-2,973

-2,827

495

-134

-3,926

-2,890

-2,860

-1,823

-2,864

-3,559

-1,657

-4,429

ELEV STORAGE

 44,030

 540,396

 546,270

 551,289

 556,258

 560,748

 565,481

 568,962

 576,897

 581,491

 584,689

 587,984

 591,226

 593,182

 593,044

 592,811

 592,575

 590,973

 589,431

 586,458

 583,631

 584,126

 583,992

 580,066

 577,176

 574,316

 572,493

 569,629

 566,070

 564,413

 559,984

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 536,366

0

2,000

3,000

3,000

2,500

2,500

0

2,500

2,500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

18,000
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA
OMAR K

HADR, P etitioner , v. Civil Action No. 04-1136 (JD B) BARACK

H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Misc. No. 08- 0442 (TF H)

ORDER Be fore the Court are[297] Khadr ' s motion for leave to file a sec ond amende d habea s petition and [305] Khadr ' s motion t o lift the stay in this case. Upon c onsideration of the se motions, the par

ties' sever al memora

nda, and the entire r ecord here in, and for the rea sons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED that Khadr ' s motion for leave to file a sec ond amende d habea s petition is GR ANTED ; and it is further ORDERED that his moti on to lift the stay is DENIED
. SO ORDERED
. /s/ J ohn D. B ates J OHN D. B ATES United States District J udg e Dated: July

20, 2010