alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 459.66

 460.88

 462.05

 462.80

 464.22

 464.77

 465.89

 466.29

 466.85

 467.25

 468.09

 469.72

 469.67

 470.24

 470.57

 471.60

 472.42

 473.51

 474.96

 474.75

 475.21

 475.78

 476.89

 477.52

 478.09

 479.50

 479.85

 480.41

 481.00

 481.38

 1,069,601

 1,082,109

 1,094,150

 1,101,891

 1,116,596

 1,122,309

 1,133,971

 1,138,146

 1,143,998

 1,148,185

 1,156,992

 1,174,145

 1,173,618

 1,179,634

 1,183,122

 1,194,029

 1,202,735

 1,214,338

 1,229,829

 1,227,582

 1,232,507

 1,238,617

 1,250,577

 1,257,371

 1,263,528

 1,278,802

 1,282,603

 1,288,692

 1,295,117

 1,299,262

 7,752

 7,669

 7,606

 7,393

 6,496

 7,283

 5,127

 7,761

 7,784

 7,825

 8,243

 14,970

 6,540

 7,727

 7,052

 5,375

 5,039

 7,419

 13,608

 2,416

 5,590

 7,173

 11,161

 5,536

 5,374

 12,567

 4,100

 7,058

 7,116

 5,537

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL December 19, 2000

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2000 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 247,317 0 6,020 208,347

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 17,656

 12,508

 12,041

 7,741

 14,705

 5,713

 11,662

 4,175

 5,852

 4,187

 8,807

 17,153

-527

 6,016

 3,488

 10,907

 8,706

 11,603

 15,491

-2,247

 4,925

 6,110

 11,960

 6,794

 6,157

 15,274

 3,801

 6,089

 6,425

 4,145

 140

 151

 152

 156

 156

 160

 153

 157

 160

 164

 164

 166

 168

 166

 160

 162

 162

 161

 160

 163

 272

 338

 330

 321

 321

 335

 321

 244

 218

 139

7,266

7,194

7,104

7,339

5,837

6,759

5,535

6,546

7,188

7,397

7,754

14,491

6,113

7,343

6,604

4,825

4,414

6,948

13,334

2,154

5,035

6,375

10,679

4,954

4,741

12,096

3,608

6,488

6,796

5,430

ELEV STORAGE

 222,297

 638,005

 645,199

 652,303

 659,642

 665,479

 672,238

 677,773

 684,319

 691,507

 698,904

 706,658

 721,149

 727,262

 734,605

 741,209

 746,034

 750,448

 757,396

 770,730

 772,884

 777,919

 784,294

 794,973

 799,927

 804,668

 816,764

 820,372

 826,860

 833,656

 839,086

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 630,739

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
### §3912. GAO report

Not later than 24 months after the effective date of this chapter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall transmit a report to the Congress on the effectiveness of the provisions of this chapter in preventing the importation or exportation of rough diamonds that is prohibited under section 3903 of this title. The Comptroller General shall include in the report any recommendations on any modifications to this chapter that may be necessary.

(Pub. L. 108–19, §13, Apr. 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 636.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For effective date of this chapter, see section 15 of Pub. L. 108–19, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 15 of Pub. L. 108–19, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

SHIRLEY ANN GINWRIGHT 20-10872-KHK 

 

 Debtor

TRUSTEE’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SELL REAL ESTATE 

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee, responds to Debtor’s Motion to Sell Real Estate 

by stating he has no opposition so long as the proceeds specified in the Motion are paid 

over to Trustee as stated in Plan. 

_July 8, 2020______ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 8th day of July, 2020 mailed a true copy of the 

foregoing Response to the following parties. 

Shirley Ann Ginwright 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

11615 Gunston Rd. 

Lorton, VA 22079 

Barry Weintraub, Esq. 

Counsel for Debtor 

32 Hayes Street 

Stafford, VA 22556

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 20-10872-KHK Doc 53 Filed 07/08/20 Entered 07/08/20 16:07:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 86.409 What are the procedures for conducting a hearing on the record? ( a ) A hearing on the record is an orderly presentation of arguments and evidence conducted by an ALJ.
( b ) An ALJ conducts the hearing entirely on the basis of briefs and other written submissions unless— ( 1 ) The ALJ determines, after reviewing all appropriate submissions, that an evidentiary hearing is needed to resolve a material factual issue in dispute; or
( 2 ) The ALJ determines, after reviewing all appropriate submissions, that oral argument is needed to clarify the issues in the case.
( c ) The hearing process may be expedited as agreed by the ALJ, the designated Department official, and the IHE. Procedures to expedite may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) A restriction on the number or length of submissions.
( 2 ) The conduct of the hearing by telephone conference call.
( 3 ) A review limited to the written record.
( 4 ) A certification by the parties to facts and legal authorities not in dispute.
( d ) ( 1 ) The formal rules of evidence and procedures applicable to proceedings in a court of law are not applicable.
( 2 ) The designated Department official has the burden of persuasion in any proceeding under this subpart.
( 3 ) ( i ) The parties may agree to exchange relevant documents and information.
( ii ) The ALJ may not order discovery, as provided for under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any other exchange between the parties of documents or information.
( 4 ) The ALJ accepts only evidence that is relevant and material to the proceeding and is not unduly repetitious.
( e ) The ALJ makes a transcribed record of any evidentiary hearing or oral argument that is held, and makes the record available to— ( 1 ) The designated Department official; and
( 2 ) The IHE on its request and upon payment of a fee comparable to that prescribed under the Department of Education Freedom of Information Act regulations (34 CFR part 5).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1145g)
[55 FR 33581, Aug. 16, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 66225, Dec. 17, 1996]
### 26 2013 Mar 26 2013 Mar 26

( 808 ) 471-0794 ANNETTE T. TIJERINA annette.tijerina@navy.mil
#### LARSON, Respondent, v. ANDERSON, Appellant.

(263 N. W. 159.)

(File No. 7779.

Opinion filed November 18, 1935.)

*Lars A. Bruce*and *Eldon W. Clark,*both of Yankton, for Appellant.

L. *A. Bridgman,*of Kennebec, and *Peterson & Barta,*of Wausa, Neb., for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined appellant’s record and the assignments of error, and we are of the opinion that there is evidence to support the findings, and that, as a matter of law, the respondent was entitled to the judgment entered by the trial court.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the order and judgment appealed from are affirmed.
(No. 77-CC-0921

*Order filed August 15, 1977.*

#### Michael Smith, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*226Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl. ,*this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### §3692. Jury trial for contempt in labor dispute cases

In all cases of contempt arising under the laws of the United States governing the issuance of injunctions or restraining orders in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the contempt shall have been committed.

This section shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice nor to the misbehavior, misconduct, or disobedience of any officer of the court in respect to the writs, orders or process of the court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 844.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 111 of Title 29, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Labor (Mar. 23, 1932, ch. 90, §11, 47 Stat. 72).

The phrase "or the District of Columbia arising under the laws of the United States governing the issuance of injunctions or restraining orders in any case involving or growing out of a labor dispute" was inserted and the reference to specific sections of the Norris-LaGuardia Act (sections 101–115 of Title 29, U.S.C., 1940 ed.) were eliminated.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Taft-Hartley Injunctions

Former section 111 of Title 29, Labor, upon which this section is based, as inapplicable to injunctions issued under the Taft-Hartley Act, see section 178 of Title 29.
Exhibit 15.1
   
   Sincerely yours,/s/ Commerce & Finance Law OfficesCommerce & Finance Law Offices
### §2441. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title XIV, §1401(b)(2), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3294; Pub. L. 106–36, title I, §1001(a)(4), June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 130

Section, Pub. L. 93–618, title IV, §411, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2065, related to East-West Foreign Trade Board.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 440.09

 440.22

 440.31

 440.44

 440.71

 440.41

 439.52

 438.60

 437.66

 437.06

 436.59

 436.34

 436.09

 435.64

 435.08

 434.47

 433.72

 433.06

 432.46

 432.03

 431.79

 431.75

 431.59

 431.45

 431.35

 431.34

 431.50

 431.57

 431.78

 431.84

 707.2

 708.5

 709.3

 710.6

 713.2

 710.3

 701.8

 693.0

 684.1

 678.4

 674.0

 671.7

 669.3

 665.1

 659.9

 654.3

 647.4

 641.3

 635.8

 631.9

 629.8

 629.4

 627.9

 626.7

 625.8

 625.7

 627.1

 627.8

 629.7

 630.2

STORAGE

+0.7

+1.3

+0.9

+1.3

+2.6

-2.9

-8.5

-8.8

-8.9

-5.7

-4.4

-2.3

-2.3

-4.2

-5.2

-5.6

-6.9

-6.1

-5.5

-3.9

-2.2

-0.4

-1.4

-1.3

-0.9

-0.1

+1.4

+0.6

+1.9

+0.5

CHANGE

3,613

3,833

3,902

3,877

4,661

3,907

3,868

3,708

3,668

3,486

3,603

3,844

3,441

3,312

2,892

3,060

2,758

2,377

2,370

2,455

2,689

3,285

2,507

2,630

2,754

3,331

3,585

3,410

3,640

2,873

INFLOW

 3,084

 3,015

 3,228

 3,045

 3,126

 5,146

 7,952

 7,919

 7,933

 6,090

 5,471

 4,773

 4,402

 5,202

 5,184

 5,623

 6,029

 5,232

 4,893

 4,267

 3,580

 3,321

 2,931

 2,986

 2,881

 2,890

 2,399

 2,729

 2,454

 2,371

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 118

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 138

 135

 144

 131

 152

 149

 154

 158

 171

 186

 187

 177

 155

 148

 152

 164

 167

 151

 136

 125

 128

 138

 182

 207

 212

 219

 222

 224

 203

 229

PUMPING

 51

 51

 93

 70

 71

 70

 70

 57

 57

 66

 168

 75

 65

 77

 65

 108

 46

 46

 97

 36

 75

 9

 123

 75

 117

 267

 235

 138

 27

 0

C.F.S.

 .16

 .16

 .29

 .22

 .22

 .22

 .22

 .18

 .18

 .21

 .54

 .24

 .21

 .25

 .21

 .35

 .15

 .15

 .32

 .12

 .25

 .03

 .41

 .25

 .39

 .89

 .78

 .46

 .09

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .08

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 20, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -76.3 99,339 130,156 0 127 5,044 2,505 8.15 .15

ACRE-FEET -76,300 197,039 258,164 0 252 10,005 4,969

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 258,164

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 10,005

TOTAL 268,421

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 19.34

 706.6

OUTLET 252 .15

Table 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 173

 176

 169

 156

 172

 183

 294

 355

 347

 401

 303

 293

 260

 273

 237

 240

 256

 387

 537

 487

 340

 318

 339

 406

 396

 393

 405

 609

 805

 1,628

 1,424

 120

 116

 114

 114

 116

 117

 118

 121

 123

 125

 132

 133

 133

 133

 134

 135

 137

 137

 138

 140

 141

 143

 141

 141

 139

 138

 137

 136

 142

 155

 157

 133

 131

 131

 128

 130

 131

 147

 157

 151

 177

 174

 173

 167

 163

 166

 174

 172

 189

 215

 207

 175

 172

 196

 201

 210

 217

 212

 251

 305

 477

 429

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,970

 1,937

 1,914

 1,893

 1,875

 1,862

 1,869

 1,888

 1,902

 1,942

 1,983

 2,027

 2,064

 2,093

 2,126

 2,169

 2,210

 2,271

 2,356

 2,432

 2,460

 2,475

 2,520

 2,544

 2,580

 2,624

 2,669

 2,757

 2,896

 3,199

 3,456

 141

 138

 137

 135

 134

 133

 134

 135

 136

 139

 142

 145

 147

 150

 152

 155

 158

 162

 168

 174

 176

 177

 180

 182

 184

 187

 191

 197

 207

 229

 247

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
COMMENTS: Values in Acre-Feet

Day

Elev

Feet Storage Change

Federal

Pump

Federal

Gen

Pacheco

Pump ADJ

Federal

Change

Federal

Storage

255,786

1 430.31 783,790 -7,109 0 4,646 287 0 -4,793 250,993

2 429.64 777,622 -6,168 0 3,510 292 0 -3,888 247,105

3 429.10 772,663 -4,959 0 3,524 273 0 -3,860 243,245

4 428.59 767,989 -4,674 0 3,531 288 0 -3,885 239,360

5 428.01 762,686 -5,303 0 3,145 296 0 -3,600 235,760

6 427.39 757,031 -5,655 0 3,403 302 0 -3,711 232,049

7 426.88 752,390 -4,641 0 2,286 303 0 -2,518 229,531

8 426.23 746,489 -5,901 0 4,604 311 0 -4,902 224,629

9 425.59 740,699 -5,790 0 3,432 316 0 -3,684 220,945

10 425.02 735,544 -5,155 0 3,449 311 0 -3,739 217,206

11 424.62 731,934 -3,610 0 3,518 318 0 -3,814 213,392

12 424.44 730,312 -1,622 0 1,176 331 0 -1,585 211,807

13 424.04 726,712 -3,600 0 1,116 324 0 -1,469 210,338

14 423.46 721,504 -5,208 0 1,123 322 0 -1,474 208,864

15 422.92 716,668 -4,836 0 3,352 328 0 -3,709 205,155

16 422.51 713,004 -3,664 0 3,386 321 0 -3,712 201,443

17 422.10 709,347 -3,657 0 3,377 299 0 -3,688 197,755

18 421.57 704,630 -4,717 0 3,405 293 0 -3,696 194,059

19 421.13 700,723 -3,907 0 2,246 317 0 -2,686 191,373

20 420.58 695,851 -4,872 0 1,130 280 0 -1,372 190,001

21 419.94 690,198 -5,653 0 1,136 225 0 -1,414 188,587

22 419.45 685,881 -4,317 0 3,434 92 2,494 -958 187,629

23 418.70 679,293 -6,588 0 1,158 241 0 -1,415 186,214

24 418.18 674,740 -4,553 0 2,303 289 0 -2,609 183,605

25 417.65 670,111 -4,629 0 2,317 338 0 -2,808 180,797

26 417.18 666,016 -4,095 0 1,164 357 0 -1,312 179,485

27 416.75 662,278 -3,738 0 0 338 0 -404 179,081

28 416.22 657,681 -4,597 0 1,114 346 0 -1,487 177,594

29 415.74 653,528 -4,153 0 1,115 345 0 -1,415 176,179

30 415.22 649,040 -4,488 0 1,128 326 0 -1,448 174,731

31 414.92 646,456 -2,584 0 0 305 0 -361 174,370

Totals -144,443 0 74,228 9,314 2,494 -81,416

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Federal 

Daily Operations

July 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2024
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 6890** 

JAMES P. MOODY, JR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; MICHAEL BEINOR, Doctor; KIMBERLY C. GASTIN, LPN; AMY SMITH; ADRIENN L. FULLER, in the ir individual capacities and in their official capacities ,
Defendants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 9:09

- cv
- 01480

- CMC )

Submitted : August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

James P. Moody, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews; Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRI DGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
James P. Moody , Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing Moody’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil
rights action . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thir ty days after the entry of

the district court ’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely
filing of a notice of ap peal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement .” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on April 13, 2010

. The notice of appeal was filed on

May 25, 2010

. *

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court

. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (1) ; Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988). Because Moody failed to file a timely notice of
appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal
period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented3 in the materials before the court and argument wou ld not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §550. False claim for refund of duties

Whoever knowingly and willfully files any false or fraudulent entry or claim for the payment of drawback, allowance, or refund of duties upon the exportation of merchandise, or knowingly or willfully makes or files any false affidavit, abstract, record, certificate, or other document, with a view to securing the payment to himself or others of any drawback, allowance, or refund of duties, on the exportation of merchandise, greater than that legally due thereon, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both, and such merchandise or the value thereof shall be forfeited.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 718; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 1590 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §590, 46 Stat. 750).

Reference to felony, contained in words "such person shall be guilty of a felony" was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of felony in section 1 of this title. This, too, was the policy adopted by the codifiers of the 1909 Criminal Code. (See S. Rept. 10, pt. I, pp. 12, 13, and 14, 60th Cong., 1st sess.)

Words "and upon conviction thereof" before "shall be punished" were also omitted as unnecessary, since punishment cannot be imposed until a conviction is secured.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 191

 183

 176

 168

 162

 161

 159

 158

 155

 152

 153

 152

 151

 153

 147

 145

 143

 141

 139

 139

 142

 141

 143

 144

 144

 147

 145

 148

 149

 151

 174

 172

 164

 158

 158

 156

 137

 152

 150

 146

 146

 140

 141

 140

 139

 139

 136

 132

 135

 135

 135

 135

 136

 136

 138

 137

 138

 140

 140

 143

 182

 176

 170

 161

 160

 158

 156

 155

 152

 150

 149

 147

 145

 144

 143

 141

 139

 138

 137

 137

 137

 138

 138

 140

 140

 141

 141

 143

 145

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,195.42

 1,195.40

 1,195.38

 1,195.36

 1,195.34

 1,195.33

 1,195.31

 1,195.28

 1,195.26

 1,195.23

 1,195.20

 1,195.18

 1,195.16

 1,195.15

 1,195.13

 1,195.11

 1,195.10

 1,195.06

 1,195.04

 1,195.03

 1,195.00

 1,194.99

 1,194.97

 1,194.96

 1,194.92

 1,194.89

 1,194.88

 1,194.86

 1,194.84

 1,194.82

 1,194.81

 43.51

 43.47

 43.44

 43.41

 43.37

 43.36

 43.32

 43.27

 43.24

 43.19

 43.14

 43.11

 43.08

 43.06

 43.03

 42.99

 42.98

 42.91

 42.88

 42.86

 42.81

 42.79

 42.76

 42.75

 42.68

 42.63

 42.62

 42.58

 42.55

 42.52

 42.50

STORAGE

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.07

-0.03

-0.02

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.07

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

CHANGE

3

0

-1

2

-2

6

3

-6

7

1

-3

5

5

12

0

0

9

-15

3

12

0

14

3

12

-12

4

12

4

3

1

8

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

OUTLET

 7

 4

 3

 6

 2

 2

 7

 6

 11

 13

 9

 9

 9

 7

 4

 4

 4

 6

 7

 7

 12

 9

 7

 7

 8

 15

 8

 7

 6

 5

 3

C.F.S.

 .13

 .08

 .06

 .11

 .04

 .04

 .13

 .12

 .20

 .24

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .13

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .12

 .14

 .13

 .23

 .17

 .14

 .13

 .15

 .28

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .09

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/07/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.03 90 403 0 214 4.03 .07

ACRE-FEET -1,030 179 799 0 424

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 799

 799

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2006 .07

 43.54