alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Alan M. Schnaid, certify that:  1)
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Westin Hotels Limited
Partnership;2)
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3)
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4)
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5)
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants 1.




---



##### 



auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: March 28, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Alan M. SchnaidAlan M. SchnaidPrincipal Accounting Officer ofWestin Realty Corp., theGeneral Partner of WestinHotels Limited Partnership
 2.
12/2/2021

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data. Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total 

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS 

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Y 0N 853 971 1,824 1,691 2-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 411 815 1,226 815 

3-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 4Y 406 818 1,224 805 4-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 412 412 0 

5-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 291 400 692 578 6-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0Y 0 429 429 0 

7-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 527 405 933 1,046 8-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 822 822 0 

9-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 1,058 819 1,877 2,099 

10-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 515 826 1,341 1,022 11-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 405 827 1,232 803 

12-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 413 413 0 

13-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 398 398 0 14-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 372 372 0 15-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 2N 0N 1,281 406 1,687 2,541 16-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 8N 8N 1,705 814 2,519 3,381 17-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 N 0 N 1,904 896 2,800 3,776 18-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4N 0N 1,709 903 2,612 3,389 19-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0Y 945 812 1,756 1,874 20-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4N 0N 515 805 1,320 1,022 21-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 804 804 0 22-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 623 825 1,447 1,235 23-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 3 877 880 6 

24-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 1 0 1 0 0N 0N 623 842 1,465 1,235 

25-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 840 840 0 26-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 521 827 1,348 1,034 

27-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0N 0 802 802 0 28-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 4N 267 802 1,068 529 

29-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 4N 0 803 803 0 

30-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 8Y 291 803 1,094 578 

31-Mar-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 N 16 Y 408 413 821 809 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 1 0 1 XXXX 34 44 15,260 22,001 37,261 30,268 

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

MARCH 2021

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
## The Impact of Pellet Fuel Ash Content on Particulate Emission Performance of Pellet Heaters

10 -21 -2010

# Background

• Many of the certified pellet heaters were tested using pellets with very low ash content (< 0.5%). • These pellets are made from softwood feed stock and are produced in the Pacific Northwest. • These pellets are commonly available for the lab that conducted much of the pellet heater certification testing. • Pellets that are most commonly available in other areas of the country where pellet heaters are popular are generally hardwood or mixed wood and have higher ash content (>1%). 10 -21 -2010

### • There was supposition that higher ash fuels would result in higher particulate emissions.

– This was based on observations made by pellet heater manufacturers when they tested other fuel types (corn, grains, hulls, etc.) that were known to have higher ash content than wood pellets.

10 -21 -2010

### • There was almost no data directly comparing low and high ash wood pellet fuels in the same heater using the same test method. • There was concern over the impacts on BDT since different pellets might produce different results, even when the burn settings are optimized.
10 -21 -2010

### • This concern expands further when other fuel types are considered (corn, grain, hulls, pits, switch grass, etc.)

10 -21 -2010

# Action

• HPBA has been working to obtain data that will shed some light on this potential problem. • Some comparison testing has been conducted, both in manufacturer labs and one EPA accredited lab. • The results obtained to date are shown in the following table. 10 -21 -2010

# Test Results (To - date)

10 -21 -2010

### • There is one softwood versus hardwood pellet test series that has been completed but the data has not been QA’d. This data will be added will be available within a few days.

10 -21 -2010

# Conclusions

• Based on the limited data obtained so far, it appears that higher ash pellets will produce higher levels of particulate emissions. • Due to the fact that pellet heaters include combustion air blowers, it is likely that the additional PM collected with the higher ash fuels is primarily ash (inorganic) that has been entrained in the exhaust flow. • The higher ash pellet fuels dominate the available pellet fuel supply in areas other than the west coast (primarily due to available feedstock for the pellet mills). 10 -21 -2010• An assessment of the impact on BDT determination must be made before pellet heater emission levels (passing grade(s)) can be set within the revised NSPS. • The performance of pellet heaters on higher ash fuels can still provide a clean - burning option. • Without considering this issue, alternative bio fuel development and heater development for those fuels could be stifled. 10 -21 -2010
(No. 77-CC-2126

#### Fisher Scientific Co., Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed November 8, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Respondent.

Respondent’s motion states as follows:

> “1. That the claim herein seeks the recovery of $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement.

> 2. That Claimant filed a second claim seeking $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to the Respondent.

> 3. That Claimant filed a third claim for $8,100.00, for the delivery of four electrometers. (78 CC 718)

> 4. That Claimant, in fact, delivered four electrometers to Respondent as alleged in the third complaint. (78 CC 718)

> 5. That the claim herein duplicates a portion of claim no. 78 CC 718.

> 6. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 37, Sec. 26, (1977) states that there shall be but one satisfaction of any cause of action.

> *7397. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 110, Sec. 48(c), (1977) states that another action pending between the same parties for the same cause is a ground for dismissal.”

Motion for dismissal in this cause is hereby granted and said cause dismissed. All the matters contained herein can be disposed of in Case No. 78 CC 718.
EXHIBIT 23.1
   
  Page 3
#### § 24.229 Tank car and tank truck requirements.

Railroad tank cars and tank trucks used to transport spirits for use in wine production will be constructed, marked, filled, labeled, and inspected in the manner required by regulations in 27 CFR part 19.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1360, as amended, 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5206, 5214))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 520.58

 519.48

 518.08

 516.81

 515.37

 513.96

 512.04

 510.56

 509.90

 508.28

 507.02

 505.60

 503.88

 502.37

 500.66

 499.15

 497.57

 496.09

 494.50

 492.98

 491.08

 489.25

 487.87

 486.16

 484.49

 482.68

 480.66

 478.51

 476.53

 475.01

 473.44

 1,750,002

 1,736,739

 1,719,908

 1,704,689

 1,687,490

 1,670,707

 1,647,946

 1,630,475

 1,622,705

 1,603,685

 1,588,946

 1,572,390

 1,552,417

 1,534,954

 1,515,259

 1,497,940

 1,479,891

 1,463,051

 1,445,033

 1,427,879

 1,406,534

 1,386,078

 1,370,719

 1,351,767

 1,333,344

 1,313,473

 1,291,413

 1,268,071

 1,246,700

 1,230,365

 1,213,592

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,185

 8,386

 7,533

 6,874

 11,042

 8,598

 13,462

 9,401

 5,504

 16,720

 8,217

 8,435

 10,192

 10,705

 10,176

 7,999

 8,039

 7,930

 8,198

 7,904

 7,191

 7,855

 5,775

 7,973

 8,333

 10,955

 9,870

 9,433

 10,343

 5,952

 6,974

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL June 23, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2004 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -554,553 274,154 16,769 -289,717

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-18,143

-13,263

-16,831

-15,219

-17,199

-16,783

-22,761

-17,471

-7,770

-19,020

-14,739

-16,556

-19,973

-17,463

-19,695

-17,319

-18,049

-16,840

-18,018

-17,154

-21,345

-20,456

-15,359

-18,952

-18,423

-19,871

-22,060

-23,342

-21,371

-16,335

-16,773

 376

 415

 379

 437

 411

 399

 433

 463

 475

 418

 452

 441

 603

 583

 630

 669

 640

 668

 651

 666

 648

 648

 599

 519

 629

 627

 615

 599

 576

 586

 514

-8,474

-8,663

-7,860

-7,410

-11,494

-8,856

-13,945

-9,342

-6,334

-16,890

-9,115

-8,879

-10,660

-11,121

-10,816

-8,612

-8,641

-8,657

-8,844

-8,408

-7,810

-8,340

-6,429

-8,402

-9,467

-11,301

-10,436

-9,820

-10,889

-6,342

-7,460

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 821,126

 812,463

 804,603

 797,193

 785,699

 776,843

 762,898

 753,556

 747,222

 730,332

 721,217

 712,338

 701,678

 690,557

 679,741

 671,129

 662,488

 653,831

 644,987

 636,579

 628,769

 620,429

 614,000

 605,598

 596,131

 584,830

 574,394

 564,574

 553,685

 547,343

 539,883

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 829,600

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.08

 360.05

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.11

 360.08

 360.11

 360.08

 360.11

 360.11

 360.08

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.11

 360.13

 360.13

 360.13

 360.13

 360.11

 541

 541

 541

 543

 541

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 545

 543

 545

 543

 545

 545

 543

 545

 545

 545

 545

 545

 546

 546

 546

 546

 545

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+2

-2

+2

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

-1

CHANGE

 456

 456

 456

 400

 395

 450

 451

 472

 472

 472

 467

 455

 454

 454

 442

 439

 455

 457

 473

 456

 425

 425

 431

 435

 415

 415

 426

 404

 386

 422

 442

 253

 255

 253

 252

 251

 252

 254

 0

 252

 252

 253

 254

 251

 250

 251

 252

 253

 252

 252

 253

 254

 215

 250

 263

 278

 278

 278

 280

 277

 281

 276

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4 0 7,725 13,658

ACRE-FEET +4 0 15,323 27,091

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 66,818

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 27,091

 109,232

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,921

 1,908

 1,895

 1,835

 1,820

 1,869

 1,872

 1,887

 1,890

 1,885

 1,886

 1,874

 1,875

 1,871

 1,865

 1,864

 1,894

 1,783

 1,737

 1,728

 1,691

 1,683

 1,578

 1,539

 1,541

 1,527

 1,526

 1,508

 1,494

 1,597

 1,634

 54,477

 108,055

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 15,323

 1,204

 1,204

 1,199

 1,195

 1,202

 1,199

 1,195

 1,210

 1,209

 1,200

 1,201

 1,203

 1,203

 1,197

 1,203

 1,194

 1,206

 1,100

 1,044

 1,041

 1,041

 1,038

 924

 879

 876

 870

 851

 858

 857

 926

 958

 33,687

 66,818

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
§ 19.59 Conveyance of untaxpaid spirits or wines within a distilled spirits plant. ( a ) The proprietor may move untaxpaid spirits or wines: ( 1 ) Between different portions of the bonded premises at the same distilled spirits plant or across any other premises of that plant;
( 2 ) Over any public thoroughfare by uninterrupted transportation; or
( 3 ) Over a private roadway by uninterrupted transportation. The owner or lessee of the private roadway must agree in writing to allow TTB officers access to the roadway to perform their duties.
( b ) The conveyance of untaxpaid spirits or wines under paragraph (a) of this section is subject to the following conditions. The proprietor: ( 1 ) May not store or allow the untaxpaid spirits or wines to remain on any premises other than the bonded premises;
( 2 ) Must keep the untaxpaid spirits or wines separate from spirits on which the tax has been paid or determined;
( 3 ) Must submit to the appropriate TTB officer a description of the means, route of the conveyance, and the areas of the distilled spirits plant, public thoroughfare or roadways across which spirits or wines will be conveyed, and a copy of any agreement with the owner or lessee of a private roadway. The appropriate TTB officer must approve the proposed means and route of conveyance and any agreement; and
( 4 ) Must provide a consent of surety on the operations or unit bond (TTB Form 5000.18) extending the terms of the bond to cover the conveyance of the spirits or wines.
(26 U.S.C. 5201 and 5601)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.22

 360.22

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.22

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.22

 360.22

 360.22

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.16

 360.16

 360.16

 360.16

 360.16

 360.19

 360.16

 360.19

 360.16

 360.19

 360.16

 360.16

 360.16

 360.27

 360.24

 552

 552

 550

 550

 550

 552

 550

 550

 550

 552

 552

 552

 550

 550

 550

 550

 548

 548

 548

 548

 548

 550

 548

 550

 548

 550

 548

 548

 548

 556

 554

STORAGE

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+2

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+2

-2

+2

-2

+0

+0

+8

-2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 35

 101

 119

 179

 214

 211

 217

 230

 245

 255

 255

 255

 247

 495

 491

 495

 492

 491

 503

 493

 491

 486

 488

 490

 493

 488

 492

 489

 489

 470

 437

 434

 435

 436

 434

 435

 437

 433

 432

 424

 432

 437

 483

 578

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2 0 14,603 2,563

ACRE-FEET +2 0 28,965 5,084

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 35,687

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 5,084

 69,736

 552

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 479

 476

 712

 867

 868

 947

 1,008

 1,010

 1,010

 1,015

 1,018

 1,013

 1,024

 1,032

 1,022

 1,162

 1,206

 1,179

 1,214

 966

 1,306

 1,414

 1,446

 1,361

 1,310

 1,320

 1,351

 1,390

 1,428

 1,522

 1,742

 34,818

 69,062

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 28,965

 3

 3

 226

 394

 396

 473

 550

 553

 555

 555

 555

 555

 556

 557

 557

 683

 750

 752

 752

 753

 754

 754

 755

 678

 628

 628

 650

 673

 697

 733

 864

 17,992

 35,687

RIVER CANALS
#### In Re HOSFORD

(265 N. W. 598.)

(File No. 7110.

Opinion filed March 7, 1936.)

*John Sutherland-,*of Pierre, and *Geo-. A. Buffington,*of Dallas, for Petitioner.

*Walter Conutfay,*of Pierre, for the State.

PER CURIAM..

The above-entitled applicant, having been disbarred from the practice of law by previous opinion of this court (In re Hosford, 62 S. D. 374, 252 N. W. 843), has made application for reinstatement; the Attorney General of this state appearing in opposition thereto. Applicant appeared in person and by counsel, and the matter has been fully submitted! to, and considered by, the court. Prom the petition and facts presented in support thereof when considered with the previous record of the applicant, the same are deemed insufficient to warrant his reinstatement. The judges are of the opinion, therefore, that saidl application should be denied.

Hon. H. R. HAN'UBY, the Judge of the Seventh Circuit, and Hon. FRANK R. FISHER, one of the Judges of the Ninth Circuit, sitting in place of Judges POULEY and' ROBERTS, disqualified.
(No. 6961

#### Charles Mortkowicz, Mortkowicz Nursing Home, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

Charles Mortkowicz, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
.Y 1. -1

that the oo~ty *5~ulU legallyaontrootwith uoue a~umoy to bring togat,hcr

t!lo bondholdersand persuade tttom to exohan,ga

their title percent.bonda

for othera bearinga lam rate, and running over a &nger psrlcfl,

and to pear

the rrgoncy

to 'j~epaX'@

and file applloetion for approval **of a**  **refunding plan;**  **uurk out**  glm~~, *to preprr aca dslivor s3.l legalpopero necessaryfor tha oonswm6itfon of the plans,' ths foe far tie servioesto be paid fro= the
roea ena bridge sl inn fuad

+-Ye and not ilero from ttie

procssdoof sele, sin00 the p n prov BE for no mle.*

In the contract submAttedby you, It ~ppeara that in order to make the bonds svsllablcfor refund&g, Christiek Companytill hcve to so&r@ the outatandlw bends and ~mnce~wi11bo tho bondi:oldera,

for w.iloae

benafft the sinki~&fund wca oraated,and till axchangetbe o;ad

bond8 for t!m rofundle bonds with full knowledge that the mlakiai:

fun4 hns be@n tmed In part to a&a the rafurrdl~ possible,tlmroby oonsentla~ to the 1188 of three tunQ8 for t?mab pUTRose*

Tn our opinion haber O-3320, o cog CU whioh oplnfon ia enclosedharcrwlt!i, we held thst the iScard of ounty and Dlctriot E Iload Indrbtciiness has asiple

authority to pay s pmdu~~ for sllg:ble roed bonds and to use t!m sinki= funds of **CCUntieB** depositedwith tiio Board to r&tire auoh bends, in paymentof suah pro&m. Xa based our oonolusionin OpinionO-3320 on provisionsof eubneot@n (m) of sootlon 6 ur &use 911 688 peaeed by the l&h Loidslstura, Eefylar 9ession, 1939. This Acti does ucjt cxprcs31y author?ze the payment 0r a preaiumout of these funds, but lo h.piiea rrotu the authority@an&d to purahass th6 bontis prior to maturity, I;1 otk3r vorih, the ii06 of thee0 funds fcr thet purpo~ is in keepingwit% tiie

purpose f~cr

urNoh t'la

fund wru created,nBpely, cl:e

ultinateredwtlon cf tha bonds. Your second queatlon is, t:xmerore, auawep5U in the affirmative.

Yours very truly