alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.66 Registry of stills.

The provisions of subpart C of part 29 of this chapter are applicable to stills on the premises of a permittee used for distilling. As provided in § 29.55, the listing of a still in the permit application (Form 5150.22), and approval of the application, constitutes registration of the still.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1355, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5179))

[T.D. ATF-207, 50 FR 23682, June 5, 1985]
#### Joseph A. Wasserman, Respondent, v. The Bronx Home News Publishing Company and James O’Flaherty, Jr., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Order modified by requiring the bill of particulars to be served *904twenty days after the completion of the examination of the plaintiff before trial, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,021

 1,061

 1,064

 1,080

 1,090

 1,074

 1,033

 980

 986

 956

 1,041

 994

 1,015

 1,004

 1,027

 1,030

 987

 1,030

 1,029

 1,031

 1,011

 960

 940

 969

 885

 880

 896

 885

 911

 955

 883

 816

 829

 861

 822

 862

 794

 785

 751

 744

 767

 781

 774

 802

 814

 803

 794

 789

 783

 776

 761

 751

 722

 749

 743

 708

 702

 698

 686

 662

 679

 665

 893

 920

 918

 925

 927

 923

 904

 866

 842

 849

 861

 852

 869

 867

 860

 853

 843

 849

 847

 839

 831

 815

 803

 794

 763

 753

 750

 740

 740

 756

 729

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


                          CERTIFICATION OF 10-Q REPORT
                                       OF
                           CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.

                    FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002



1.       The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
         Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. ("Crown Media Holdings"). This
         Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Crown Media
         Holdings for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

2.       We certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of Crown Media Holdings.

This Certification is executed as of November 14, 2002.


                                  /s/  DAVID J. EVANS
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  David J. Evans, President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                  /s/  WILLIAM J. ALIBER
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  William J. Aliber, Executive Vice President
                                  and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12,229.

#### John Thompson Grocery Company, et al. *v.*Industrial Commission, et al.

Decided November 12, 1928.

Mr. Glenn L. Daly, Mr. Joel E. Stone, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The commission allowed compensation, temporary and permanent, to one Healy. The temporary was paid, the insurance carrier contests the permanent. The district court sustained the commission and the case comes here on error. The plaintiff in error asks for a stay until the decision here.

In *Lackey v. Industrial Com.,*80 Colo. 112, 249 Pac. 662, the compensation was paid while the case was pending here. The case was reversed, hut without substantial effect, of course, because payment had been com*543pleted. In *Employers’ Co. v. Industrial Com.,*65 Colo. 283, 176 Pac. 314, we held that it was the intention of the statute that the payment of the weekly allowances should not be stayed pending judicial review, because it “would in effect practically nullify one of the prime objects and purposes of the law. ” It is claimed, however, in the present case, and is conceded by the attorney general, that Healy has gone back to work and is working, so his rights will be in no way prejudiced or affected by the stay. There is clearly danger that injustice will from time to time result if we adopt an inflexible rule for such situations. A writ of error with a stay, if the beneficiary be in such condition as to be in immediate need, as is often the case, will result in serious harm to him, and if his claim be just will defeat the purpose of the statute; but in case of one at work and not in immediate need, a denial of the stay and consequent payment of the full amount will, in case of a reversal, defeat the writ of error and so defeat the purpose of the act in so far as it permits the writ. We think, therefore, that we should consider the point in the light of the facts of each particular case and that in the present case we should allow the stay.

Stay ordered.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 228

 221

 226

 232

 223

 234

 238

 233

 234

 235

 229

 282

 250

 244

 243

 244

 253

 257

 258

 261

 262

 256

 253

 253

 251

 245

 254

 253

 252

 244

 248

 200

 200

 209

 210

 213

 215

 215

 220

 223

 214

 209

 217

 218

 220

 219

 221

 228

 224

 226

 240

 232

 237

 234

 233

 231

 224

 225

 222

 221

 225

 227

 212

 214

 215

 217

 218

 221

 224

 224

 226

 227

 225

 234

 233

 233

 233

 233

 236

 238

 241

 249

 250

 249

 245

 244

 242

 239

 238

 238

 237

 237

 236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 286

 342

 360

 402

 473

 547

 602

 543

 484

 450

 425

 455

 587

 555

 623

 623

 695

 780

 683

 823

 835

 849

 928

 836

 772

 657

 723

 745

 864

 999

 215

 217

 219

 223

 224

 228

 227

 237

 245

 249

 247

 259

 263

 267

 271

 278

 286

 303

 296

 312

 317

 331

 348

 358

 359

 353

 354

 361

 373

 389

 233

 247

 250

 263

 291

 320

 337

 328

 321

 316

 303

 330

 350

 338

 362

 364

 402

 424

 408

 460

 465

 500

 530

 508

 483

 479

 468

 475

 518

 553

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,387

 3,387

 3,384

 3,395

 3,440

 3,512

 3,599

 3,679

 3,758

 3,833

 3,901

 3,998

 4,118

 4,227

 4,356

 4,473

 4,625

 4,786

 4,903

 5,043

 5,171

 5,343

 5,552

 5,744

 5,924

 6,073

 6,191

 6,328

 6,484

 6,673

 242

 242

 242

 243

 246

 251

 257

 263

 268

 274

 279

 286

 294

 302

 311

 320

 330

 342

 350

 360

 369

 382

 397

 410

 423

 434

 442

 452

 463

 477

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,538

 1,482

 1,443

 1,398

 1,400

 1,406

 1,413

 1,395

 1,360

 1,341

 1,349

 1,475

 1,628

 1,637

 1,641

 1,687

 1,643

 1,648

 1,610

 1,592

 1,580

 1,558

 1,581

 1,594

 1,594

 1,688

 1,780

 1,825

 1,785

 1,736

 1,078

 1,078

 1,124

 1,124

 1,156

 1,105

 1,147

 1,128

 1,125

 1,079

 1,043

 1,171

 1,180

 1,191

 1,204

 1,133

 1,213

 1,198

 1,153

 1,227

 1,217

 1,289

 1,230

 1,239

 1,286

 1,307

 1,286

 1,258

 1,189

 1,174

 1,332

 1,317

 1,327

 1,310

 1,300

 1,300

 1,292

 1,275

 1,255

 1,241

 1,252

 1,303

 1,350

 1,399

 1,447

 1,431

 1,429

 1,452

 1,437

 1,430

 1,436

 1,430

 1,427

 1,440

 1,456

 1,517

 1,539

 1,546

 1,514

 1,482

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 255

 253

 247

 248

 291

 342

 390

 409

 437

 420

 406

 391

 400

 406

 412

 415

 459

 476

 500

 499

 459

 436

 416

 398

 388

 386

 399

 376

 394

 392

 231

 234

 228

 224

 234

 233

 298

 330

 349

 356

 331

 293

 328

 356

 358

 323

 372

 388

 414

 411

 413

 389

 336

 347

 330

 342

 346

 338

 343

 343

 245

 243

 238

 236

 259

 299

 342

 367

 380

 387

 364

 351

 358

 376

 378

 377

 414

 433

 454

 458

 436

 414

 391

 372

 355

 358

 361

 353

 358

 366

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 6, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of Spire  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A (the  "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I,
Christian  Dufresne,  Chief  Financial  Officer and  Treasurer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 24, 2008              By:  /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Christian Dufresne, Ph. D.
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


        A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signatures  that  appear in typed  form  within the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 361.11

 361.13

 361.13

 361.42

 360.70

 361.76

 361.74

 361.73

 361.73

 361.73

 361.71

 361.73

 361.73

 361.71

 361.58

 361.58

 361.58

 361.58

 361.60

 360.73

 360.73

 361.45

 361.58

 361.58

 361.58

 361.58

 361.58

 361.60

 361.58

 361.61

 361.60

 615

 616

 616

 636

 586

 660

 659

 658

 658

 658

 657

 658

 658

 657

 648

 648

 648

 648

 649

 588

 588

 639

 648

 648

 648

 648

 648

 649

 648

 650

 649

STORAGE

+0

+1

+0

+20

-50

+74

-1

-1

+0

+0

-1

+1

+0

-1

-9

+0

+0

+0

+1

-61

+0

+51

+9

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

-1

+2

-1

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 57

 32

 0

 0

 0

 0

 17

 55

 77

 72

 65

 2,992

 3,047

 3,037

 3,472

 4,536

 5,034

 5,087

 5,035

 5,026

 5,052

 5,022

 5,006

 5,025

 5,021

 4,821

 4,505

 4,506

 4,511

 4,507

 2,854

 2,018

 2,414

 4,512

 4,504

 4,508

 4,511

 4,501

 4,510

 4,507

 4,503

 4,508

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2019

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +34 0 133,092 375

ACRE-FEET +34 0 263,988 744

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 14,327

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 744

 279,059

 615

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 2,896

 2,915

 2,929

 3,372

 4,396

 4,894

 4,951

 4,898

 4,891

 4,907

 4,893

 4,877

 5,052

 5,247

 5,051

 4,760

 4,758

 4,807

 4,765

 3,134

 2,479

 2,900

 4,804

 4,791

 4,810

 4,807

 4,817

 4,912

 4,936

 4,911

 4,905

 137,465

 272,662

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 263,988

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 147

 323

 324

 325

 326

 326

 326

 325

 410

 452

 421

 417

 416

 415

 428

 464

 464

 460

 454

 7,223

 14,327

RIVER CANALS
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Alexander S. Bacon, Appellant, for the Determination and Enforcement of His Lien against Funds in the Hands of Baldwin Schlesinger and Leo Schlesinger as Executors, etc., of Abraham Schlesinger, Deceased, Respondents, and Due the Estate of Mark Schlesinger, Deceased.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to any action that the petitioner may bring to *900enforce Ms claim to a lien. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, LaugMin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 650.20 What are the selection procedures? ( a ) The Fellowship Board establishes criteria for the selection of fellows.
( b ) Each year the Fellowship Board selects specific fields of study, and the number of fellows in each field (within the humanities, arts and social sciences), for which fellowships will be awarded.
( c ) The Fellowship Board, or in the event the Secretary contracts with a non-governmental entity to administer the program, that non-governmental entity, appoints panels of distinguished individuals in each field to evaluate applications.
( d ) The Secretary may make awards of the fellowships each year in two or more stages, taking into account at each stage the amount of funds remaining after the level of funding for awards previously made has been established or adjusted.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1134a)
[58 FR 58084, Oct. 28, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 3199, Jan. 20, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 803

 769

 737

 698

 657

 651

 687

 605

 538

 525

 542

 551

 576

 516

 582

 508

 493

 498

 456

 445

 420

 418

 425

 399

 414

 392

 415

 403

 420

 594

 591

 582

 568

 544

 510

 507

 502

 475

 454

 458

 435

 436

 421

 397

 400

 402

 395

 389

 388

 377

 371

 367

 364

 349

 354

 351

 302

 323

 671

 641

 632

 607

 581

 561

 561

 532

 505

 492

 481

 470

 470

 445

 457

 433

 425

 422

 408

 400

 391

 384

 384

 377

 371

 367

 369

 355

 357

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 14,905

 14,133

 13,229

 12,063

 11,267

 10,381

 9,809

 9,358

 8,960

 8,636

 8,362

 8,119

 7,888

 7,649

 7,435

 7,227

 7,020

 6,835

 6,662

 6,501

 6,331

 6,183

 6,062

 5,947

 5,837

 5,734

 5,633

 5,543

 5,443

 1,065

 1,010

 945

 862

 805

 742

 701

 668

 640

 617

 597

 580

 563

 546

 531

 516

 501

 488

 476

 464

 452

 442

 433

 425

 417

 410

 402

 396

 389

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Opinion filed January 13 , 2022



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_________ ___ No s . 11
- 2 2
- 00 006
- CR & 11
- 2 2
- 00 007
- CR

___________ _ EX PARTE MIGUEL MANUEL VILLALOBOS JR.

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding s

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Miguel Manuel Villalobos Jr. has filed in this court a pro se application for writ of habeas corpus related to two cause s pending in Gaines County : Cause Nos. 21

- 5641 and 21

- 5650

. Villalobos asserts that he is innocent and that he is being illega lly restrained , and he asks this court for habeas relief

. We dismiss th ese proceeding s
. This court has no jurisdiction over Villalobos’ s original application for writ of habeas corpus

. This court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See T EX
. C ONST

. art. V, §§ 5, 6 (providing that the Court of Criminal Appeals has the power to issue writs of habeas corpus and that intermediate courts of appeals only have original jurisdiction as prescribed by law); T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
.2 § 22.221 (West Supp. 202 1 ) (limited writ powers granted to the cour ts of appeals). Furthermore, a n intermediate appellate court “does not possess original habeas corpus jurisdiction of a bail issue” in a criminal case. Ortiz v. State , 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2009, no pet.); see Ex parte Enriquez , 2 S.W.3 d 362, 363 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, orig. proceeding) ; Denby v. State , 627 S.W.2d 435 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding) ; see also T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.0 5 (West 2015 ) (providing that district courts, county courts, and the Co urt of Criminal Appeals have power to issue writs of habeas corpus)

. Because we lack jurisdiction over Villalob o s ’s application for writ of habeas corpus , we dismiss these proceedings for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
January 13, 2022 Do not publish. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er , J., and W illiams, J.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


List of Institutions of Higher Education Ineligible for Federal 
Funds

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is published to identify institutions of higher 
education that are ineligible for contracts and grants by reason of a 
determination by the Secretary of Defense that the institution 
prohibits or in effect prevents military recruiter access to the 
campus, students on campus or student directory information. It also 
implements the requirements set forth in section 983 of title 10, 
United States Code, and 32 CFR part 216. The institutions of higher 
education so identified are:
    Vermont Law School, South Royalton, Vermont.
    William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota.

ADDRESSES: Director for Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, 4000 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-4000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Paul Nosek, (703) 
695-5529.

    Dated: April 1, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-8377 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### § 19.516 Certificate of label approval or exemption.

A proprietor must obtain a certificate of label approval or an exemption from label approval under part 5 of this chapter on form TTB F 5100.31 for any label that the proprietor will use on bottles of spirits for domestic use. Upon request by the appropriate TTB officer, the proprietor must provide evidence of label approval, or of exemption from label approval, for a label used on a bottle of spirits for domestic use. For procedures regarding the issuance, denial and revocation of certificates of label approval and certificates of exemption from label approval, as well as appeal procedures, see part 13 of this chapter.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.215 Shipment of articles and spirits residues for redistillation. ( a ) The proprietor of a distilled spirits plant authorized to produce distilled spirits may receive for redistillation ( 1 ) articles manufactured under this part which contain denatured spirits, and
( 2 ) spirits residues of manufacturing processes related to the manufacture of these articles.
( b ) Any person shipping these articles or spirits residues to a distilled spirits plant for redistillation shall— ( 1 ) Identify each package or articles or spirits residues as to contents, and
( 2 ) Mark and serially number each package as provided in § 20.214.
#### § 24.112 Name of proprietor and trade names.

The applicant shall list on the application, TTB F 5120.25, the proprietor's name or the operating trade name, if different than the proprietor's name, and any bottling or packing trade names. However, if a bottling or packing trade name is listed on a basic permit issued to the proprietor under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (49 Stat 978; 27 U.S.C. 204), that trade name is not required to be listed again on the application. If State or local law requires the registration of a trade name, the applicant shall certify that each trade name listed on the application is so registered. A trade name may not be used prior to approval of the application or issuance of a basic permit covering the use of the name.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5356))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0058)
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.122 S.D.A. 39-C general-use formula.

S.D.A. 39-C general-use formula is a formula for articles made with alcohol denatured in accordance with S.D.A. Formula No. 39-C. Articles made pursuant to this general-use formula shall contain, in each gallon of finished product, not less than 2 fl. oz. of perfume material (essential oils as defined in § 21.11, isolates, aromatic chemicals, etc.). Unless approved with the endorsement “for export only,” all articles made with alcohol denatured in accordance with S.D.A. Formula No. 39-C must be made in accordance with this formula.

[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59458, Aug. 30, 2016]