alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.6 Delegations of the Administrator.

The regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.25, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 25, Beer. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16941, Apr. 4, 2006]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


May 19, 2011
**Exhibit
          32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
          connection with the Annual Report of Specialized Health Products International,
          Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
          “Report”), I, David A. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
          pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
                  David A.
                  GreenDavid
                    A. Green
                  Chief
                      Financial Officer
                    March
                        14, 2008
§ 76.134 What is the relationship between consolidated and non-consolidated grants? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70336 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) An Insular Area may request that any number of programs in § 76.125(c) be included in its consolidated grant and may apply separately for assistance under any other programs listed in § 76.125(c) for which it is eligible.
( b ) Those programs that an Insular Area decides to exclude from consolidation—for which it must submit separate plans or applications—are implemented in accordance with the applicable program statutes and regulations. The excluded programs are not subject to the provisions for allocation of funds among programs in a consolidated grant.
(Authority: 48 U.S.C. 1469a)
[47 FR 17421, Apr. 22, 1982]
### §3103. Investigation of foreign telecommunications trade barriers

#### (a) In general

The Trade Representative shall conduct an investigation to identify priority foreign countries. Such investigation shall be concluded by no later than the date that is 5 months after August 23, 1988.

#### (b) Factors to be taken into account

In identifying priority foreign countries under subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall take into account, among other relevant factors—

(1) the nature and significance of the acts, policies, and practices that deny mutually advantageous market opportunities to telecommunications products and services of United States firms;

(2) the economic benefits (actual and potential) accruing to foreign firms from open access to the United States market;

(3) the potential size of the market of a foreign country for telecommunications products and services of United States firms;

(4) the potential to increase United States exports of telecommunications products and services, either directly or through the establishment of a beneficial precedent; and

(5) measurable progress being made to eliminate the objectionable acts, policies, or practices.

#### (c) Revocations and additional identifications

(1) The Trade Representative may at any time, after taking into account the factors described in subsection (b)—

(A) revoke the identification of any priority foreign country that was made under this section, or

(B) identify any foreign country as a priority foreign country under this section,

if information available to the Trade Representative indicates that such action is appropriate.

(2) The Trade Representative shall include in the semiannual report submitted to the Congress under section 2419(3) of this title a detailed explanation of the reasons for the revocation under paragraph (1) of this subsection of any identification of any foreign country as a priority foreign country.

#### (d) Report to Congress

By no later than the date that is 30 days after the date on which the investigation conducted under subsection (a) is completed, the United States Trade Representative shall submit a report on the investigation to the President and to appropriate committees of the Congress.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1374, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1217.)
(No. 74-CC-805

#### Mobil Oil Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Appellate Court, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 27, 1974.*

Giffin, Winning, Linder, Newkirk, Cohen, Bodewes & Narmont, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 11:00 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Chappell, Linda; Elizabeth Klein 

Subject: Potential Times for a conversation on the discussion around CO2 health impacts in 

the RIA 

Hi, 

Can we schedule an hour in the next week to talk about the language on the CO2 health impacts? 

Looking at our calendars, the following times work for us? 

5/27: 10-11, noon-2:30 

5/28: noon-1, 2:30-4 

5/29: 10:30-12:30, 2-3 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

202.395.7856
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-308-310 and 520-521 (Third Review)]


Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Brazil, China, Japan, 
Taiwan, and Thailand

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, 
and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2010 (75 F.R. 
60814) and determined on January 4, 2011 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (76 FR 5205).
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on April 4, 2011. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4222 (April 2011), entitled Carbon 
Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, and 
Thailand: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-308-310 and 520-521 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 4, 2011.
James Holbein,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-8354 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Mary E. Cox, appellee, v. Josiah L. Parrotte et al., appellants.

Filed March 7, 1900.

No. 9,174.

1. Decree of Foreclosure: Review: Limitation. This court can not review a decree of foreclosure when the same was rendered more than two years prior to the perfecting of the appeal.

S. Judicial Sale: Motion to Vacate: Objections. On a motion to vacate a judicial sale, objections to the _ decree under which such sale was made can not be considered.

Appeal from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Greene, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Hamer & Hamer,*for appellants,

cited: Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence [3d ed.], 1227, note; 2 Jones, Mortgages, sec. 1540; *Peabody v. Roberts,*47 Barb. [N. Y.], 91; *Schadt v. Heppe,*45 Cal., 433; *Bates v. Ruddielc,*2 la., 423; *Hosford v. Johnson,*74 Ind., 479; *Jefferson v. Coleman,*110 Ind., 515; *Shaw v. Heisey,*48 la., 468; *Bolles 'v. Duff,.*43 N. Y., 469; *Catterlin v. Armstrong,*101 Ind., 258.

*S. M. Nevius, contra.*

Norval, C. J.

On March 14, 1895, the district court of Buffalo county entered a decree of foreclosure in this cause, determining the priority of the several liens; and ordered, in case the defendants should fail for fifteen months to pay the costs, and pay the plaintiff and cross-petitioners the sums found by the decree to be due each, with interest thereon, that the defendants, excepting the cross-petitioners and the McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Company and Erastus E. Brown, be foreclosed of all equity of redemption, right, title or interest in the mortgaged premises; and that the property be sold by the sheriff, and the proceeds brought into court to be applied in satisfaction of the amounts found due the respective lienors in the *702order of the priority of the liens as found by the court. A sale of the premises under this decree was had, a motion to set aside the same was filed and overruled, and the sale confirmed, from which order the Nebraska Land Growing & Investment Company appeals.

One of the points made in the motion to vacate the sale was that the premises were not sold free and clear of liens, but subject to the liens of the cross-petitioners and the McKinley-Lanning Loan *&*Trust Company and Erastus E. Brown, which were junior to the lien of the plaintiff. The objection is wholly unavailing. The property was sold in strict compliance with the terms of the decree of foreclosure. The fault, if any, was with the decree, which can not now be reviewed, since the same was rendered more than two years prior to the docketing of this appeal. The order is

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 250

 241

 243

 233

 231

 220

 218

 215

 209

 206

 206

 207

 200

 213

 211

 210

 211

 214

 206

 199

 191

 194

 186

 194

 202

 210

 223

 218

 219

 216

 218

 184

 209

 182

 205

 178

 164

 146

 167

 171

 180

 168

 172

 149

 150

 177

 167

 156

 161

 135

 138

 132

 121

 123

 124

 152

 135

 141

 154

 159

 142

 133

 231

 230

 227

 221

 212

 207

 199

 194

 201

 197

 196

 194

 186

 196

 200

 200

 196

 197

 191

 183

 175

 172

 170

 174

 183

 188

 199

 200

 197

 201

 201

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
EXHIBIT 31-1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Litwin, President, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mirtronics Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The  company's  other   certifying   officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal control
          over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the period covered by
          the annual  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably
          likely to materially or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     company's  auditors  and the  audit  committee  of the  company's  board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  company's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: December 11, 2003
By: /s /MARK LITWIN
Mark Litwin
President
Mirtronics Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,123

 1,113

 1,126

 1,133

 1,149

 1,127

 1,114

 1,061

 1,021

 999

 972

 947

 925

 910

 885

 857

 832

 816

 761

 715

 686

 636

 579

 527

 506

 486

 468

 435

 420

 401

 363

 1,031

 995

 973

 998

 981

 966

 941

 916

 926

 914

 908

 892

 864

 811

 810

 773

 763

 601

 634

 635

 585

 544

 460

 443

 431

 410

 364

 350

 348

 308

 288

 1,080

 1,075

 1,069

 1,060

 1,064

 1,060

 1,027

 1,007

 983

 967

 945

 926

 904

 879

 855

 832

 807

 751

 715

 685

 638

 589

 524

 487

 475

 446

 408

 385

 384

 350

 323

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### U.S. Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 106-148, the NCGMP and NGGDPP Advisory Committee will meet on June 22nd and June 23rd, 2011, in room 3A417 of the U.S. Geological Survey Headquarters building, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192. The Advisory Committee, comprising representatives from Federal agencies, State agencies, academic institutions, and private companies, shall advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey on planning and implementation of the geologic mapping and data preservation programs.

The Committee will hear updates on progress of the NCGMP toward fulfilling the purposes of the National Geological Mapping Act of 1992; the Federal, State, and education components of the NCGMP; and the National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program.

# DATES:

June 22-23, 2011, commencing at 8:30 a.m. on June 22 and adjourning by 5 p.m. on June 23.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephanie Brown, U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 908, National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6948.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Meetings of the National Cooperative Geological Mapping Program and National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program Advisory Committee are open to the Public.

Dated: March 29, 2011.

Kevin T. Gallagher,

Associate Director for Core Science Systems.

[FR Doc. 2011-8400 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Thomas
E. Gay III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.




By:
            /s/
      Thomas E. Gay IIIThomas
      E. Gay IIIChief
      Financial Officer and Secretary





Date:
April 1, 2010
### SUBCHAPTER I—FUNCTIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 103–382, title II, §221, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3913, amended subchapter heading generally.
Exhibit
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory
      A. Pitner, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




EarthBlock
              Technologies, IncDate: August
              21, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Gregory
              A. PitnerChief
              Executive Officer
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 542 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 

the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 542 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Research 

3 and Development for First Responders Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL URBAN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY LAB5 ORATORY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Homeland Secu7 rity Act of 2002 is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 321. NATIONAL URBAN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY LAB10 ORATORY. 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through 

12 the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall 

13 designate the laboratory described in subsection (b) as an 

14 additional laboratory pursuant to the authority under sec15 tion 308(c)(2). Such laboratory shall be used to test and 

16 evaluate emerging technologies and conduct research and 

17 development to assist emergency response providers in 

18 preparing for, and protecting against, threats of terrorism. 

19 ‘‘(b) LABORATORY DESCRIBED.—The laboratory de20 scribed in this subsection is the laboratory— 

21 ‘‘(1) known, as of the date of the enactment of 

22 this section, as the National Urban Security Tech23 nology Laboratory; 

24 ‘‘(2) previously known as the Environmental 

25 Measurements Laboratory; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 542 RFS

1 ‘‘(3) transferred to the Department pursuant to 

2 section 303(1)(E). 

3 ‘‘(c) LABORATORY ACTIVITIES.—The laboratory des4 ignated pursuant to subsection (a), shall— 

5 ‘‘(1) conduct tests, evaluations, and assess6 ments of current and emerging technologies, includ7 ing, as appropriate, cybersecurity of such tech8 nologies that can connect to the internet, for emer9 gency response providers; 

10 ‘‘(2) conduct research and development on radi11 ological and nuclear response and recovery; 

12 ‘‘(3) act as a technical advisor to emergency re13 sponse providers; and 

14 ‘‘(4) carry out other such activities as the Sec15 retary determines appropriate.’’. 

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

17 in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after 

18 the item relating to section 320 the following new item: 

‘‘321. National Urban Security Technology Laboratory.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS