alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,195.77

 1,195.74

 1,195.71

 1,195.70

 1,195.72

 1,195.69

 1,195.67

 1,195.65

 1,195.63

 1,195.62

 1,195.63

 1,195.62

 1,195.61

 1,195.60

 1,195.58

 1,195.57

 1,195.55

 1,195.54

 1,195.52

 1,195.51

 1,195.49

 1,195.47

 1,195.46

 1,195.44

 1,195.42

 1,195.38

 1,195.36

 1,195.34

 1,195.31

 1,195.29

 1,195.28

 44.08

 44.03

 43.98

 43.97

 44.00

 43.95

 43.92

 43.88

 43.85

 43.83

 43.85

 43.83

 43.82

 43.80

 43.77

 43.75

 43.72

 43.70

 43.67

 43.65

 43.62

 43.59

 43.57

 43.54

 43.50

 43.44

 43.40

 43.37

 43.32

 43.29

 43.27

STORAGE

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.02

+0.03

-0.05

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

+0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.07

-0.03

-0.03

-0.05

-0.03

-0.02

CHANGE

-5

-4

0

9

37

-6

1

3

3

12

25

11

14

12

5

12

2

15

5

13

4

4

14

5

3

-10

6

4

-5

5

11

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 14

 6

 10

 2

 5

 4

 3

 5

 5

 5

 2

 4

 8

 6

 7

 6

 4

 8

 7

 6

 6

 6

 8

 7

 5

 8

 8

 6

 5

 7

 5

C.F.S.

 .26

 .12

 .18

 .04

 .09

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .04

 .07

 .14

 .11

 .13

 .12

 .08

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .11

 .11

 .15

 .13

 .09

 .15

 .15

 .12

 .10

 .13

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.88 205 465 0 188 3.53 .80

ACRE-FEET -880 407 922 0 373

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 922

 922

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .80

JULY 1, 2011 .80

 44.15
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1455

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Gary Lee Smith, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 11, 2010

Filed: February 15, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Lee Smith appeals the district court’s1

 denial in part of his Federal Rule

of Criminal Procedure 41(g) motion to return property. Upon careful review, see

Jackson v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court’s legal

conclusions are reviewed de novo and its findings of fact for clear error), this court

finds no reversible error. Specifically, this court agrees that Smith was not entitled to

the return of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which had been repossessed by a lienholder. See

id. at 396-97 (government may satisfy its burden by showing cognizable claim of
-2-

ownership or right to possession adverse to the movant’s). This court also concludes

Smith was not entitled to the return of the property that he admitted had been

administratively forfeited, and as to which he first alleged insufficient notice more

than five years after final publication of the notice of seizure. See 18 U.S.C. §

983(e)(1) (any person entitled to written notice in any nonjudicial civil forfeiture

proceeding under civil forfeiture statute who does not receive such notice may file

motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture), (e)(3) (motion under § 983(e)(1) may be

filed not later than 5 years after date of final publication of notice of seizure of

property), (e)(5) (motion filed under § 983(e) shall be exclusive remedy for seeking

to set aside declaration of forfeiture under civil forfeiture statute). 

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 02-4736

DANIEL FRANK KULLMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.

Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CR-99-12)

Submitted: February 20, 2003

Decided: February 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

J. Robert Haley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Daniel Kullman appeals his conviction and sentence on several

charges of probation violation. Kullman did not contest the violations,

and the district court found Kullman guilty of violating his probation

and sentenced Kullman to eleven months’ imprisonment and three

years’ supervised release. Kullman’s attorney has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), claiming

one error, but concluding that there are no meritorious grounds for

appeal. Kullman was notified of his right to file an additional brief,

which he failed to do. In accordance with the requirements of Anders,

we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for

appeal. 

By counsel, Kullman claims the district court abused its discretion

in sentencing him, but does not dispute that he was sentenced within

a guidelines range which was properly calculated. We find no merit

to Kullman’s claim on appeal because the district court has sound discretion to fix a sentence at any point within the guidelines range,

United States v. Roberts, 881 F.2d 95, 106-107 (4th Cir. 1989), and

its decision is not appealable where, as here, the range is correctly calculated. United States v. Porter, 909 F.2d 789, 794-95 (4th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm Kullman’s conviction and sentence. This

court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right

to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review.

If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that

such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this

court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion

must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. KULLMAN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,195.57

 1,195.54

 1,195.52

 1,195.49

 1,195.47

 1,195.43

 1,195.40

 1,195.38

 1,195.35

 1,195.32

 1,195.28

 1,195.26

 1,195.24

 1,195.21

 1,195.18

 1,195.15

 1,195.12

 1,195.10

 1,195.07

 1,195.04

 1,195.01

 1,194.98

 1,194.96

 1,194.93

 1,194.90

 1,194.88

 1,194.86

 1,194.85

 1,194.82

 1,194.80

 43.75

 43.70

 43.67

 43.62

 43.59

 43.52

 43.47

 43.44

 43.39

 43.34

 43.27

 43.24

 43.20

 43.16

 43.11

 43.06

 43.01

 42.97

 42.93

 42.88

 42.83

 42.78

 42.74

 42.70

 42.65

 42.61

 42.58

 42.56

 42.52

 42.48

STORAGE

-0.07

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.03

-0.07

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.03

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.05

-0.03

CHANGE

-11

-3

9

3

11

-3

5

9

6

2

-6

11

11

3

8

4

6

13

3

4

5

2

9

3

1

10

10

18

4

12

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 10

 9

 13

 15

 15

 16

 15

 11

 16

 12

 12

 13

 13

 13

 18

 14

 16

 15

 13

 14

 15

 12

 11

 13

 11

 12

 11

 12

 14

 13

C.F.S.

 .18

 .17

 .24

 .27

 .28

 .29

 .28

 .21

 .29

 .23

 .23

 .24

 .24

 .25

 .33

 .26

 .30

 .28

 .24

 .26

 .29

 .22

 .21

 .25

 .21

 .22

 .20

 .23

 .27

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/18/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.33 159 440 0 397 7.42 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,330 315 873 0 787

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 873

 873

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2012 .00

 43.82
exv10w6



 








Exhibit 10.6




NUCRYST Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Board Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Annual Value
	Category	 	NUCRYST Plan	 	(approx.)
	Initial Equity Grant

	 	5,000 Restricted Shares
	 	n/a (1) 
	 

	 	(immediate vesting, with 1,000 available	 	 
	 

	 	for sale in 1 year and 4,000 to be held for	 	 
	 

	 	duration of board service)	 	 
	 

	 	8,000 Stock Options	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer

	 	$15,000 
	 	$15,000 
	Board Meeting Fees

	 	$2,000/meeting
	 	$12,000 (assumes 6 meetings/year)
	(including
	 	 	 	 
	telephone meetings)
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Stock Award

	 	3,000 Restricted Shares
	 	$55,000 (2)
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	(50% vest after 1 year and 50% after	 	 
	 

	 	second year)
	 	Total Annual Board Comp. — $82,000 
	 

	 	2,000 Stock Options	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Committee Chair

	 	$7,500 for Audit
	 	$7,500 Audit Chair
	Annual Retainer

	 	$5,000 for Human Resources & Compensation
	 	$5,000 Other Chairs
	 

	 	$5,000 for Corporate Governance and	 	 
	 

	 	Nominating	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Committee Meeting

	 	Audit
	 	$6,400 — $12,200 
	Fees

	 	     Chair — $1,500/meeting
	 	(Depending on committee and chair
	(including

	 	     Member — $1,200/meeting
	 	composition. Assumes 2 committees per
	telephone meetings)

	 	HR & Compensation / Corp. Gov. & Nominating
	 	member, and 6 audit meetings and 4 of the
	 

	 	     Chair — $1,000/meeting
	 	other committees.)
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	     Member — $800/meeting	 	 








Notes:





	(1)	 	Directors are required to hold minimum equity equal in value to 2.5 times the annual
retainer, which equates to $37,500. For purposes of this calculation,
common and restricted shares are included, but options are not. Directors have 3 years to achieve this minimum
ownership level.
	 
	(2)	 	The company will continue with its deferred share unit plan whereby directors may elect to
receive DSUs in lieu of cash fees (retainers and meeting fees). This will likely come into
force for the 2007 calendar year.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 437.48

 437.64

 437.87

 438.14

 438.31

 438.40

 438.55

 438.90

 439.13

 439.29

 439.53

 439.83

 440.05

 440.36

 440.50

 440.66

 440.79

 441.05

 441.12

 441.28

 441.44

 441.48

 441.65

 441.78

 441.91

 442.01

 442.03

 442.16

 442.50

 442.72

 442.89

 682.4

 683.9

 686.1

 688.6

 690.2

 691.1

 692.5

 695.8

 698.0

 699.6

 701.9

 704.7

 706.8

 709.8

 711.2

 712.7

 714.0

 716.5

 717.2

 718.7

 720.3

 720.7

 722.3

 723.6

 724.8

 725.8

 726.0

 727.3

 730.6

 732.7

 734.4

STORAGE

+0.7

+1.5

+2.2

+2.6

+1.6

+0.9

+1.4

+3.3

+2.2

+1.5

+2.3

+2.9

+2.1

+3.0

+1.3

+1.5

+1.3

+2.5

+0.7

+1.6

+1.6

+0.4

+1.6

+1.3

+1.3

+1.0

+0.2

+1.3

+3.3

+2.1

+1.7

CHANGE

1,695

2,057

2,418

2,508

2,160

1,683

1,976

2,908

2,318

2,170

2,447

2,572

2,385

2,697

2,207

2,273

2,038

2,536

1,676

2,134

1,790

1,712

1,919

1,904

1,940

1,564

1,504

1,944

3,123

2,614

2,148

INFLOW

 1,100

 1,024

 1,050

 950

 1,074

 1,019

 1,071

 1,038

 1,011

 1,150

 1,036

 846

 1,041

 909

 1,252

 1,236

 1,162

 1,020

 1,045

 1,079

 708

 1,215

 813

 1,010

 1,043

 816

 1,148

 1,107

 1,215

 1,277

 1,030

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 171

 178

 185

 183

 183

 164

 148

 161

 169

 181

 186

 196

 204

 196

 188

 177

 183

 191

 193

 196

 200

 201

 188

 193

 194

 193

 190

 175

 180

 190

 207

PUMPING

 91

 94

 88

 85

 88

 69

 38

 32

 32

 67

 67

 83

 77

 86

 87

 83

 61

 61

 96

 77

 100

 100

 87

 65

 68

 65

 68

 23

 55

 65

 75

C.F.S.

 .29

 .30

 .28

 .27

 .28

 .22

 .12

 .10

 .10

 .21

 .21

 .26

 .24

 .27

 .27

 .26

 .19

 .19

 .30

 .24

 .31

 .31

 .27

 .20

 .21

 .20

 .21

 .07

 .17

 .20

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .03

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +52.9 67,020 32,495 0 0 5,744 2,233 6.98 .22

ACRE-FEET +52,900 132,934 64,454 0 0 11,393 4,429

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 64,454

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 11,393

TOTAL 75,847

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = 19.58

 681.7

OUTLET 0 .22
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 142 117 126 1,571 112

2 139 120 129 1,597 114

3 202 126 150 1,644 117

4 464 133 212 1,752 125

5 492 139 253 1,899 136

6 386 140 265 2,056 147

7 347 190 261 2,208 158

8 310 189 240 2,337 167

9 263 190 226 2,451 175

10 317 144 205 2,542 182

11 330 141 215 2,641 189

12 458 187 291 2,814 201

13 472 186 293 2,988 213

14 488 182 288 3,154 225

15 0 0 0 3,028 216

16 0 0 0 2,899 207

17 0 0 0 2,749 196

18 0 0 0 2,537 181

19 535 182 294 2,578 184

20 470 179 263 2,576 184

21 386 182 237 2,552 182

22 353 176 226 2,538 181

23 299 176 208 2,520 180

24 227 187 203 2,518 180

25 255 175 204 2,507 179

26 266 183 217 2,433 174

27 321 132 228 2,368 169

28 492 181 298 2,378 170

29 679 184 337 2,715 194

30 1,192 176 337 3,052 218

31 1,107 177 336 3,388 242

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: July 2023 Run Date: 8/15/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,382

 1,322

 1,258

 1,231

 1,218

 1,208

 1,227

 1,224

 1,235

 1,262

 1,309

 1,393

 1,854

 1,798

 1,835

 1,599

 1,581

 1,478

 1,487

 1,454

 1,452

 1,452

 1,454

 1,410

 1,538

 2,058

 1,684

 1,540

 1,421

 1,339

 1,281

 1,093

 1,092

 1,067

 1,061

 1,069

 1,067

 1,068

 1,039

 1,020

 998

 1,011

 1,004

 1,004

 1,070

 1,125

 1,140

 1,104

 1,123

 1,169

 1,159

 1,146

 1,172

 1,137

 1,127

 1,131

 1,106

 1,067

 1,082

 1,094

 1,099

 1,086

 1,222

 1,201

 1,166

 1,154

 1,141

 1,130

 1,135

 1,130

 1,124

 1,114

 1,137

 1,170

 1,339

 1,355

 1,417

 1,359

 1,306

 1,288

 1,280

 1,266

 1,274

 1,318

 1,307

 1,272

 1,346

 1,419

 1,317

 1,289

 1,263

 1,228

 1,197

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 507

 501

 504

 505

 511

 511

 499

 499

 496

 487

 482

 474

 477

 491

 490

 492

 490

 490

 493

 489

 495

 488

 511

 513

 506

 504

 503

 500

 500

 500

 485

 488

 488

 478

 459

 480

 484

 488

 460

 416

 437

 423

 443

 430

 472

 475

 470

 471

 467

 431

 455

 454

 462

 475

 478

 468

 467

 468

 470

 463

 495

 495

 495

 492

 492

 494

 493

 494

 487

 466

 466

 452

 460

 470

 483

 485

 483

 484

 483

 474

 479

 476

 481

 492

 492

 489

 488

 486

 486

 485

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.77 Change in location.

When there is a change in the location of the brewery, the brewer shall file an amended Form 5130.10, and a new bond, Form 5130.22, or a consent of surety, Form 5000.18, as required under § 25.91, extending the terms of the bond or continuation certificate to cover operations at the new location. The brewer is not required to file a new bond or consent of surety if the brewer is exempt from bond requirements under § 25.91(e).

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1388, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5401))

[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1127, Jan. 4, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.57 Procedure.

The procedures prescribed by the rules of practice in permit proceedings (part 71 of this chapter) are applicable to administrative proceedings for the issuance, amendment, denial, revocation, suspension, or annulment of basic permits, the issuance of subpoenas and the taking of depositions under the Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995

<CASH>                          13,599,171 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,292,851 
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                14,892,022 
<PP&E>                          90,740,661 
<DEPRECIATION>                  16,583,348 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  99,483,214 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,469,506 
<BONDS>                         26,146,638 
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                      71,448,632 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    99,483,214 
<SALES>                         11,715,228 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                12,545,834 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    6,310,922 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   603,427 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 8,200,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               2,369,963 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,938,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4,177,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0    
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,177,565)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (31.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (31.72)

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Van Buskirk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.



|By: |  | /s/    Robert Van Buskirk                                    
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  | Name:    Robert Van Buskirk Title:    Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 14, 2003





I, Thomas Scannell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.



|By: |  | /s/    Thomas Scannell                                    
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|    |  | Name:    Thomas Scannell Title:    Chief Financial Officer



Date: May 14, 2003