alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!"#$$" !%&'()*('+'

	 



,
-	



	




 !" !
!

#!$%&%
%%'	"

  ! 

	 !
()*+,-.%

	 $


	%

)/	!

/ /

 !


%

	 0 



!!/

!!/!	



%

0 



!	%

1	 )/


2! .3&(

)%'41%

'	 !
 

101


!	
!

!5
/	

6	/ 



 
%+!

 /!



78

5
/%

9::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::

$&;5




.(59::::::::::::::::::

Aug 3 2020 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens

Aug 4 2020
+59

<<&8.%=

&8.%=

&



>?*%&

,!30@

3&;A6@6

61	>>'4B>B


	


&?%C

1B&!&%

,!30
(No. 77-CC-1760

#### Mario Alfaro, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 2, 1978.*

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

The record herein establishes without contradiction that on March 2,1977, a 13 inch Zenith television set, costing $355.95, was delivered to Stateville Correctional Center by Polk Brothers of Joliet, Illinois, for delivery to Claimant. The television set was received by one Sgt. Adams at the gate of the institution, but disappeared before it was delivered to Claimant.

*713Respondent has conceded liability for the loss of the set.

This Court held in *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*deciding that the State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

While bailment is ordinarily a voluntary contractual transaction between bailor and bailee, various types of constructive and involuntary bailments have been recognized:

> “A constructive bailment can be created between an owner of the property and one in possession thereof.” 4A Illinois Law and Practice 550, Bailments, citing *Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc., v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New Jersey, et al., 57 Ill. App.2d 90, 207 NE2d 84.*

In *Chesterfield,*the Court quotes from *Woodson v. Hare, 244 Ala. 301, 13 So2d. 172, at 174,*as follows;

> “An actual contract or one implied in fact is not always necessary to create a bailment. Where, otherwise than by mutual contract of bailment, one person has lawfully acquired the possession of personal property of another and holds it under the circumstances whereby he ought, upon principles of justice, to keep it safely and restore it or deliver it to the owner, such person and the owner of the property are, by operation of law, generally treated as bailee and bailor under a contract of bailment, irrespective of whether or not there has been any mutual assent, express or implied, to such relationship.”

The loss or damage to bailed property while in the possession of the bailee raises a presumption of negligence which the bailee must rebut by evidence of due care. The effect of this rule is not to shift the ultimate burden of proof from the bailor to the bailee, but simply to shift the burden of proceeding or going forward with the evidence.

At the trial of this cause the State presented no testimony to explain the disappearance of Claimant’s property, and presented no testimony of its freedom from negligence.

*714It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $355.95.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-43109, 333-48039, 333-74059, and
333-90044) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-06107, 033-58781, 333-72543, and
333-61438) of Progress Financial Corporation of our report dated January 21,
2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Harrisburg, PA
March 19, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50676 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON KILE CONAWAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CR-16-ALL

---------------------

April 29, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jason Kile Conaway, federal inmate # 29326-077, appeals from

the district court’s denial of his motion for an out-of-time

appeal.

A timely notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition to the

exercise of appellate jurisdiction. United States v. Merrifield,

764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985). Rule 4(b)(1)(A), Fed. R. App.

P., requires that the notice of appeal by the defendant in a
No. 98-50676

- 2 -

criminal case be filed within 10 days of entry of the judgment or

order from which appeal is taken. Rule 4(b)(4), Fed. R. App.

P., allows the district court to grant an additional 30 days in

which to file a notice of appeal upon a finding of excusable

neglect or good cause.

Because Conaway requested an extension of time to file a

notice of appeal more than one year after the last date for

making such a request, the district court was without

jurisdiction to consider his motion. Accordingly, the district

court did not err in denying the requested relief. The appeal

from the denial of the motion, insofar as it seeks an out-of-time

appeal only, is frivolous. The appeal is DISMISSED as to that

relief sought.

The motion for an out-of-time appeal also alleged that

Conaway was denied appellate counsel, that his waiver of appeal

was invalid, and that his guilty plea was involuntary.

Conaway’s motion challenged the validity of his conviction

and was filed after his conviction had become final. Thus, the

motion should be construed as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and

the district court did not err procedurally in considering the

merits. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993)(pro se actions should be liberally construed)(28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 case); United States v. De Los Reyes, 842 F.2d 755, 757

(5th Cir. 1988)(“[W]e elect to construe Reyes’ ill-styled Rule 35

pleading as a request for relief under section 2255.”).
No. 98-50676

- 3 -

However, because Conaway filed the motion after the April

24, 1996, effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act (AEDPA), the AEDPA applies to Conaway’s appeal, and

he requires a certificate of appealability (COA) to proceed. See

Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 336 (1997); United States v.

Carter, 117 F.3d 262, 264 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court

must make the initial determination whether a COA should issue.

Muniz v. Johnson, 114 F.3d 43, 45 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly,

we remand the case for a COA ruling from the district court.

DISMISSED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.59 Adoption of documents by a fiduciary.

If the business covered by a permit issued under this part, is to be operated by a fiduciary, the fiduciary may, in lieu of qualifying as a new proprietor, file a written notice, and any necessary supporting documents, to amend the predecessor's permit. The effective date of the qualifying documents filed by a fiduciary shall coincide with the effective date of the court order or the date specified therein for the fiduciary to assume control. If the fiduciary was not appointed by the court, the date the fiduciary assumed control shall coincide with the effective date of the filing of the qualifying documents.

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9183, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-443, 66 FR 13015, Mar. 2, 2001]
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Your Domain.com (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, AnthonyN. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or			15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all			material respects, the financial condition and results of operations			of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Anthony N. DeMint |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | January 29, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvatore DI BELLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 327, Docket 23585.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1955.

Decided June 9, 1955.

Matthew H. Brandenburg, New York City (Ralph J. Barra, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Leonard P. Moore, U. S. Atty., for Eastern Dist. of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Paul Windels, Jr., Brooklyn, N. Y., and Frances Thaddeus Wolff, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before CHASE and MEDINA, Circuit Judges, and RYAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.277 Discontinuance of operations.

When operations of a pilot brewing plant are to be discontinued, the operator shall notify the appropriate TTB officer stating the purpose of the notice and giving the date of discontinuance. When operations have been completed and all beer at the premises has been disposed of and accounted for, the appropriate TTB officer will note approval on the notice and return a copy to the operator.
§ 648.40 How does an academic department select fellows? ( a ) In selecting individuals to receive fellowships, an academic department shall consider only individuals who— ( 1 ) Are currently enrolled as graduate students, have been accepted at the grantee institution, or are enrolled or accepted as graduate students at an eligible nondegree-granting institution;
( 2 ) Are of superior ability;
( 3 ) Have an excellent academic record;
( 4 ) Have financial need;
( 5 ) Are planning to pursue the highest possible degree available in their course of study;
( 6 ) Are planning a career in teaching or research;
( 7 ) Are not ineligible to receive assistance under 34 CFR 75.60; and
( 8 ) ( i ) Are United States citizens or nationals;
( ii ) Are permanent residents of the United States;
( iii ) Provide evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that they are in the United States for other than a temporary purpose with the intention of becoming permanent residents; or
( iv ) Are citizens of any one of the Freely Associated States.
( b ) An individual who satisfies the eligibility criteria in paragraph (a) of this section, but who attends an institution that does not offer the highest possible degree available in the individual's course of study, is eligible for a fellowship if the individual plans to attend subsequently an institution that offers this degree.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135, 1135b)
[58 FR 65842, Dec. 16, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 13487, Mar. 18, 1999]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Godfrey Hui Chin Tong, the Chief Executive Officer of Teda Travel Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 19, 2003

/s/ GODFREYHUICHIN TONG

Name:

Godfrey Hui Chin Tong

Title:

Chief Executive Officer
§ 300.194 Show cause hearing. ( a ) If a show cause hearing is requested, the Secretary— ( 1 ) Notifies the SEA and affected LEA or other public agency, and other appropriate public and private school officials of the time and place for the hearing;
( 2 ) Designates a person to conduct the show cause hearing. The designee must not have had any responsibility for the matter brought for a hearing; and
( 3 ) Notifies the SEA, LEA or other public agency, and representatives of private schools that they may be represented by legal counsel and submit oral or written evidence and arguments at the hearing.
( b ) At the show cause hearing, the designee considers matters such as— ( 1 ) The necessity for implementing a by-pass;
( 2 ) Possible factual errors in the written notice of intent to implement a by-pass; and
( 3 ) The objections raised by public and private school representatives.
( c ) The designee may regulate the course of the proceedings and the conduct of parties during the pendency of the proceedings. The designee takes all steps necessary to conduct a fair and impartial proceeding, to avoid delay, and to maintain order.
( d ) The designee has no authority to require or conduct discovery.
( e ) The designee may interpret applicable statutes and regulations, but may not waive them or rule on their validity.
( f ) The designee arranges for the preparation, retention, and, if appropriate, dissemination of the record of the hearing.
( g ) Within 10 days after the hearing, the designee— ( 1 ) Indicates that a decision will be issued on the basis of the existing record; or
( 2 ) Requests further information from the SEA, LEA, other public agency, representatives of private schools or Department officials.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(f)(3))
#### Ciro Ferrerra v. Consolidated Telegraph and Electrical Subway Company.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.05

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 359.97

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 541

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 535

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

STORAGE

-4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+4

-4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 243

 228

 230

 230

 226

 228

 231

 242

 249

 235

 248

 226

 225

 225

 229

 229

 228

 228

 227

 228

 228

 227

 229

 228

 226

 229

 225

 243

 227

 228

 227

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 22, 2005

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4 0 7,152 0

ACRE-FEET -4 0 14,186 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 54

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 14,240

 541

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 215

 220

 204

 231

 237

 235

 229

 226

 226

 212

 210

 223

 230

 238

 244

 246

 245

 245

 245

 245

 242

 242

 243

 244

 243

 233

 242

 229

 242

 245

 248

 7,259

 14,398

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 14,186

 6

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 4

 3

 4

 5

 27

 54

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
§ 19.132 Change in proprietorship. ( a ) *General.* If there is a change in proprietorship at a distilled spirits plant that holds an operating permit, the following requirements apply to the outgoing proprietor and to the incoming (successor) proprietor. ( 1 ) *Outgoing proprietor.* An outgoing proprietor must comply with the requirements of § 19.147. An outgoing proprietor may transfer spirits to its successor an accordance with § 19.141.
( 2 ) *Successor proprietor.* A successor to the proprietorship of a plant that holds an operating permit: ( i ) Must file form TTB F 5110.25 Application for Operating Permit Under 26 U.S.C. 5171(d) and obtain an operating permit;
( ii ) Must file the required bonds, subject to the exemption provided in § 19.151(d); and
( iii ) May adopt the approved formulas of its predecessor in accordance with §§ 5.28 and 20.63 of this chapter.
( b ) *Fiduciary.* If the successor to the proprietorship of a plant is an administrator, executor, receiver, trustee, assignee, or other fiduciary, the successor must comply with the provisions of paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The following rules also apply in this case: ( 1 ) The fiduciary may furnish a consent of surety to extend the terms of the predecessor's bond instead of filing a new bond;
( 2 ) On TTB F 5110.25, Application for Operating Permit Under 26 U.S.C. 5171(d), the fiduciary may incorporate by reference any information contained in the predecessor's application that is still current;
( 3 ) The successor must furnish a certified copy of the order of the court or other pertinent document showing the successor's qualification as fiduciary; and
( 4 ) The effective date of the qualifying documents that the fiduciary files will be the date of the court order, the date specified in the order whereby the fiduciary assumes control, or if there is no court order, the date that the fiduciary assumed control.
(26 U.S.C. 5172)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1120, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 359.97

 359.97

 359.95

 359.95

 359.95

 360.05

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.44

 360.22

 360.05

 360.03

 360.03

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 534

 535

 535

 534

 534

 534

 541

 568

 568

 568

 568

 568

 568

 568

 568

 552

 541

 539

 539

STORAGE

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

-1

+0

+0

+7

+27

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-16

-11

-2

+0

CHANGE

 290

 306

 328

 328

 328

 342

 335

 327

 320

 316

 289

 130

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 223

 216

 193

 199

 199

 197

 201

 197

 200

 204

 202

 203

 205

 208

 203

 206

 203

 202

 234

 940

 1,010

 1,010

 1,010

 1,010

 1,010

 1,000

 1,000

 918

 365

 349

 351

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4 0 13,868 3,639

ACRE-FEET +4 0 27,507 7,218

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 5,871

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 7,218

 40,596

 535

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 837

 842

 838

 861

 853

 861

 861

 848

 828

 821

 792

 520

 293

 295

 291

 292

 290

 293

 320

 966

 1,025

 1,025

 1,025

 1,023

 1,010

 1,002

 1,003

 918

 380

 374

 378

 21,965

 43,568

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 27,507

 264

 257

 252

 253

 253

 255

 272

 254

 233

 231

 232

 120

 7

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 5

 4

 2,960

 5,871

RIVER CANALS
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.155 Spirits consumed in manufacturing intermediate products.

Spirits consumed in the manufacture of an intermediate product—which are not contained in the intermediate product at the time of its use in nonbeverage products—are not subject to drawback. Such spirits are not considered to have been used in the manufacture of nonbeverage products. However, see § 17.127 with respect to optional treatment of ingredients as unfinished nonbeverage products, rather than as intermediate products.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.167 Recovered and restored denatured spirits tanks. Suitable storage tanks shall be provided for recovered and restored denatured spirits. Each storage tank for recovered and restored denatured spirits shall be— ( a ) Durably marked to show its capacity and use,
( b ) Equipped for locking to control access to the contents, and
( c ) Provided with an accurate means of measuring its contents.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,981

 14,486

 14,999

 15,308

 15,576

 15,738

 15,121

 15,984

 16,983

 16,548

 16,399

 16,276

 14,620

 12,272

 12,882

 12,388

 14,299

 15,540

 15,580

 16,438

 16,847

 0

 18,121

 17,960

 17,142

 16,568

 14,890

 14,297

 13,687

 14,236

 14,557

 7,876

 5,503

 8,265

 5,491

 6,342

 5,924

 7,233

 7,500

 5,173

 4,448

 5,550

 6,862

 6,458

 6,542

 4,994

 6,455

 6,215

 7,661

 7,365

 7,901

 7,658

 0

 7,518

 8,141

 8,411

 8,506

 6,641

 7,109

 7,734

 8,268

 8,820

 10,610

 9,449

 11,071

 9,878

 10,355

 10,724

 11,315

 10,937

 10,264

 9,366

 11,266

 11,148

 10,368

 9,233

 9,640

 8,807

 9,613

 10,345

 10,811

 11,427

 11,607

 0

 12,234

 12,534

 12,133

 12,487

 10,956

 10,571

 10,713

 10,790

 10,896

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER