alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 167

 163

 163

 158

 158

 160

 164

 166

 175

 183

 191

 200

 214

 222

 226

 226

 232

 236

 243

 246

 249

 261

 274

 285

 294

 297

 305

 312

 314

 310

 312

 159

 156

 140

 145

 138

 138

 140

 153

 162

 169

 173

 172

 186

 194

 203

 203

 201

 207

 197

 193

 213

 211

 230

 238

 245

 225

 260

 267

 280

 270

 248

 164

 161

 154

 153

 151

 150

 152

 160

 167

 174

 180

 187

 198

 207

 211

 211

 213

 218

 215

 223

 229

 235

 246

 255

 264

 266

 278

 288

 296

 295

 285

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,624

 3,763

 3,455

 3,685

 4,117

 3,859

 4,137

 4,592

 4,883

 4,626

 4,764

 4,553

 4,848

 5,429

 4,587

 3,864

 3,535

 3,306

 3,751

 3,952

 3,599

 3,387

 3,690

 4,081

 4,974

 3,857

 3,720

 3,427

 3,258

 3,445

 3,404

 1,060

 1,070

 1,063

 1,096

 1,238

 1,332

 1,420

 1,423

 1,498

 1,351

 1,257

 1,138

 1,302

 1,418

 1,601

 1,123

 1,279

 1,241

 1,457

 1,520

 1,326

 1,266

 1,222

 1,199

 1,306

 1,323

 977

 847

 965

 1,060

 1,121

 1,877

 1,802

 1,821

 1,981

 2,168

 2,237

 2,365

 2,521

 2,635

 2,493

 2,435

 2,289

 2,410

 2,821

 2,604

 2,220

 2,193

 2,141

 2,204

 2,340

 2,102

 1,898

 1,942

 2,033

 2,493

 2,094

 1,883

 1,746

 1,738

 1,770

 1,845

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 24,490

 24,399

 24,457

 24,666

 24,958

 25,558

 26,356

 27,224

 28,197

 29,120

 29,898

 30,386

 30,973

 31,855

 32,582

 33,000

 33,372

 33,532

 33,568

 33,671

 33,408

 32,785

 32,092

 31,632

 31,690

 31,495

 30,968

 29,893

 29,027

 28,577

 28,229

 1,749

 1,743

 1,747

 1,762

 1,783

 1,826

 1,883

 1,945

 2,014

 2,080

 2,136

 2,170

 2,212

 2,275

 2,327

 2,357

 2,384

 2,395

 2,398

 2,405

 2,386

 2,342

 2,292

 2,259

 2,264

 2,250

 2,212

 2,135

 2,073

 2,041

 2,016

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,318
<SECURITIES>                                    14,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                       347
<INVENTORY>                                      7,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,331
<PP&E>                                          24,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,181
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,535
<SALES>                                         48,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,120
<CGS>                                           18,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)<F1><F3>
<FN>
<F1>On August 22, 1997, the Company effected a two-for-one split of its outstanding
shares of Common Stock. This Restated Financial Data Schedule reflects the
stock split.
<F2>Data listed for "EPS-PRIMARY" is the newly defined "BASIC EPS".
<F3>Data listed for "EPS-DILUTED" is the newly defined "DILUTED EPS".
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 298

 302

 300

 308

 309

 307

 307

 302

 302

 302

 307

 305

 315

 326

 313

 309

 308

 310

 322

 307

 309

 310

 298

 297

 288

 282

 269

 264

 273

 309

 299

 284

 283

 286

 287

 288

 289

 288

 286

 288

 288

 289

 290

 290

 290

 296

 297

 297

 298

 299

 295

 292

 288

 283

 272

 260

 251

 244

 237

 235

 234

 239

 291

 290

 291

 295

 297

 296

 294

 292

 293

 293

 295

 296

 299

 301

 301

 301

 302

 302

 305

 300

 298

 299

 290

 283

 271

 264

 255

 251

 248

 259

 258

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,065

 4,068

 4,069

 4,071

 4,072

 4,074

 4,074

 4,073

 4,077

 4,085

 4,093

 4,099

 4,110

 4,123

 4,133

 4,144

 4,155

 4,162

 4,170

 4,174

 4,178

 4,185

 4,182

 4,172

 4,148

 4,116

 4,072

 4,022

 3,969

 3,927

 3,883

 290

 291

 291

 291

 291

 291

 291

 291

 291

 292

 292

 293

 294

 295

 295

 296

 297

 297

 298

 298

 298

 299

 299

 298

 296

 294

 291

 287

 284

 281

 277

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 6517

#### Belden Manor Shelter Home, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1972.*

Cenco Care Corporation, for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Abatement Order filed October 18 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00731

- CV

____________ SURVEYING AND MAPPIN G, LLC , Appellant

V.
LE BLANC FARMS JOINT VENTURE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- DCV

- 237403



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 20, 2018

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On August 27, 2018, we ordered Elizabeth Wittu to file the record within 15 days. We received no response. On September 27, 2018, we again ordered Elizabeth Wittu to file the record within 15 days. We stated that if the record was not filed, the court woul d order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for failure to file the record. The record has not been filed.The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the

appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order. We direct the judge of the 240th District Court to conduct a hearing at which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for faili ng to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law
and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court by November 19, 2018

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by ei ther party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record before the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------




             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the quarterly report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Christian Dufresne, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: August 12, 2008                By: /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Christian Dufresne, Ph.D.
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 2 - 0 2 1 8 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 03 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 557 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 557

 To render certain military spouses eligible for adjustment of status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2019

   Mr. Soto (for himself, Mr. Sablan, Mrs. Torres of California, Ms. 
  Norton, and Mr. Espaillat) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To render certain military spouses eligible for adjustment of status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Patriot Spouses Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR CERTAIN MILITARY SPOUSES.

    Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n)(1) In applying this section to an alien described in 
paragraph (2)--
            ``(A) such alien shall be deemed, for purposes of 
        subsection (a), to have been inspected and admitted into the 
        United States; and
            ``(B) in determining the alien's admissibility as an 
        immigrant--
                    ``(i) paragraphs (6)(A), (7)(A), and (9)(B) of 
                section 212(a) shall not apply; and
                    ``(ii) the Secretary of Homeland Security, in the 
                discretion of the Secretary, may waive the application 
                of paragraphs (6)(C), (9)(A), and (9)(C) of section 
                212(a) if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of 
                the Secretary that the alien does not pose a threat to 
                the public and has not committed any criminal offenses 
                in violation of Federal or State law unrelated to the 
                alien's status.
    ``(2) An alien is described in this paragraph if the alien--
            ``(A) is or was the spouse of a United States citizen who--
                    ``(i) is or was serving on active duty in the 
                United States Armed Forces or in a reserve component of 
                the United States Armed Forces; and
                    ``(ii) if discharged or released from service in 
                the Armed Forces, was discharged or released under 
                honorable conditions; and
            ``(B) is the beneficiary of a petition for classification 
        under section 204(a)(1)(A) as an immediate relative (as defined 
        in section 201(b)) by reason of the marriage to such 
        citizen.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 348.99

 348.85

 348.72

 348.68

 349.02

 349.02

 348.88

 348.91

 348.89

 348.81

 350.05

 350.61

 351.02

 351.63

 351.92

 352.08

 352.16

 352.44

 352.84

 353.01

 353.88

 363.53

 368.52

 370.57

 371.64

 372.50

 373.18

 373.85

 374.39

 375.16

 375.62

 136.5

 136.1

 135.7

 135.6

 136.6

 136.6

 136.1

 136.2

 136.2

 135.9

 139.6

 141.4

 142.6

 144.5

 145.4

 145.9

 146.2

 147.1

 148.4

 148.9

 151.8

 186.2

 206.6

 215.5

 220.3

 224.3

 227.4

 230.6

 233.1

 236.8

 239.1

STORAGE

-0.5

-0.4

-0.4

-0.1

+1.0

+0.0

-0.4

+0.1

-0.1

-0.2

+3.7

+1.7

+1.3

+1.9

+0.9

+0.5

+0.3

+0.9

+1.3

+0.5

+2.9

+34.5

+20.3

+9.0

+4.8

+3.9

+3.2

+3.1

+2.6

+3.7

+2.2

CHANGE

519

504

457

612

887

561

506

569

542

716

2,316

1,538

1,110

1,589

1,067

847

761

912

1,304

866

1,933

17,904

10,873

5,047

3,141

2,459

1,988

2,205

1,963

2,414

1,888

INFLOW

 392

 337

 283

 507

 317

 492

 640

 467

 522

 772

 399

 613

 413

 559

 548

 536

 580

 405

 564

 532

 428

 459

 577

 461

 648

 408

 338

 560

 610

 495

 698

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 312

 312

 312

 105

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 67

 59

 55

 57

 62

 69

 72

 56

 45

 41

 48

 58

 64

 61

 52

 51

 49

 54

 60

 59

 59

 53

 53

 54

 58

 58

 55

 56

 53

 53

 56

PUMPING

 4

 3

 0

 2

 4

 0

 2

 2

 5

 21

 2

 4

 0

 6

 9

 4

 3

 0

 33

 0

 6

 13

 7

 13

 6

 6

 5

 2

 5

 5

 8

C.F.S.

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .21

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .06

 .09

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .31

 .00

 .06

 .10

 .05

 .09

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .54

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .05

 .00

 .43

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .45

 .06

 .65

 .12

 .01

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 6, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION**

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +102.2 69,998 15,560 0 1,041 1,747 180 1.55 3.12

ACRE-FEET +102,200 138,841 30,863 0 2,065 3,465 357

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 30,863

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 3,465

TOTAL 36,393

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE = 5.07

 137.0

OUTLET 2,065 3.12
**EXHIBIT 99**

 

**OTHER EXHIBITS**

 

Exhibit 99includes the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP relating to their audit ofAmeron’s financial statements for the periods ended November 30, 2002 and2001.

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

To the Boardof Directors and Stockholders of Ameron International Corporation:

 

We haveaudited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Ameron InternationalCorporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of November 30, 2002, andthe related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the periodended November 30, 2002.  These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conductedour audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in theUnited States of America.  Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financialstatements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe thatour audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In ouropinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all materialrespects, the financial position of the Company as of November 30, 2002,and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two yearsin the period ended November 30, 2002, in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Deloitte &Touche LLP

Los Angeles,California

February 3,2003 (February 24, 2004 as to the effects of the stock split described inNote 16)

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

To the Boardof Directors and Stockholders of Ameron International Corporation: 

 

We haveaudited the consolidated financial statements of Ameron InternationalCorporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of November 30, 2002, andfor each of the two years in the period ended November 30, 2002, and haveissued our report thereon dated February 3, 2003 (February 24, 2004as to the effects of the stock split described in Note 16).  Such reportis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Our audits also includedthe financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)2.  Thisfinancial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’smanagement.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on ouraudits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered inrelation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly inall material respects the information set forth therein.

 

Deloitte &Touche LLP

Los Angeles,California

February 3,2003

 

1

----