alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported)
June 21, 2011 (June 15, 2011)
 THE SHAW GROUP INC.
  Louisiana
    
    1-12227
    
    72-1106167(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identificationincorporation)
    
    
    
    No.)
 
 
 
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 Company Restated Credit
Agreement Administrative
Agent




---



##### 



Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  THE SHAW GROUP INC.
             (Registrant)Date: June 21, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Brian K. FerraioliExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer




---



##### 



THE SHAW GROUP INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit 
Number
    
    Description10.1
    
    Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
June 15, 2011, among the Company, as borrower; the
Companys subsidiaries signatories thereto, as guarantors;
BNP Paribas, as administrative agent; and the other agents
and lenders signatory thereto.99.1
    
    Press release dated June 16, 2011
### **CHAPTER 315—DISCHARGE AND RELEASE PAYMENTS**

Sec.
4281.
Repealed.
4282.
Arrested but unconvicted persons.
4283.
Repealed.
4284.
Repealed.
4285.
Persons released pending further judicial proceedings.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §218(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027, in items 4281, 4283, and 4284, substituted "Repealed" for "Discharge from prison", "Probation", and "Advances for rehabilitation", respectively.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–503, §2, Oct. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 1704, added item 4285.

**1952**—Act May 15, 1952, ch. 289, §3, 66 Stat. 73, added item 4284.
### §875. Interstate communications

(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any demand or request for a ransom or reward for the release of any kidnapped person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(c) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(d) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee or of another or the reputation of a deceased person or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 741; Pub. L. 99–646, §63, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3614; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), (H), (K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §408d (May 18, 1934, ch. 300, 48 Stat. 781; May 15, 1939, ch. 133, §2, 53 Stat. 743).

Provisions as to district of trial were omitted as covered by sections 3237 and 3239 of this title.

Definition of "interstate commerce" was omitted in conformity with definitive section 10 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(K), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(H), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(G), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500".

1986—Pub. L. 99–646 inserted "or foreign" after "interstate" wherever appearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 256

 260

 266

 259

 253

 247

 240

 238

 244

 242

 248

 256

 251

 252

 253

 253

 257

 259

 260

 268

 282

 269

 267

 267

 268

 275

 280

 280

 284

 289

 285

 216

 242

 241

 237

 231

 227

 231

 232

 230

 236

 241

 234

 245

 247

 246

 247

 248

 250

 255

 257

 261

 260

 262

 253

 255

 246

 258

 270

 272

 269

 272

 249

 251

 251

 246

 243

 237

 235

 235

 236

 239

 244

 248

 248

 249

 250

 250

 253

 254

 258

 262

 267

 265

 265

 263

 263

 265

 269

 274

 278

 278

 279

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Nothing Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

October27, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 353

 343

 343

 352

 359

 360

 368

 363

 356

 366

 365

 371

 364

 356

 361

 363

 363

 364

 360

 371

 356

 362

 362

 353

 350

 354

 333

 327

 314

 309

 310

 316

 325

 334

 341

 343

 345

 339

 338

 340

 342

 344

 343

 329

 338

 345

 347

 352

 352

 350

 348

 336

 321

 343

 329

 319

 309

 303

 303

 297

 291

 283

 338

 335

 339

 344

 348

 350

 352

 352

 351

 352

 353

 354

 349

 349

 351

 353

 355

 356

 355

 356

 350

 346

 349

 342

 334

 328

 319

 312

 306

 301

 297

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §§406 to 409. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§519, 520(a), (b), 521, 42 Stat. 973, related to copies of decisions of United States Customs Court for Collectors and Secretary of the Treasury, refund of duties and liquidation of duties.

Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to section 406, see section 1519 of this title [repealed]; section 407, see section 1520(a) of this title; section 408, see section 1520(b) of this title; section 409, see section 1521 of this title.
Vehicles Subject to the Gas Guzzler

Tax for Model Year 2009 
EPA-420-B-11-033

July 2011

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Vehicles Subject to the Gas Guzzler

Tax for Model Year 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 389.89

 390.79

 391.71

 393.29

 394.50

 396.19

 397.73

 398.76

 399.49

 400.23

 400.74

 401.20

 401.72

 402.19

 402.63

 402.87

 403.09

 403.08

 403.25

 403.41

 403.72

 403.88

 403.98

 404.16

 404.38

 404.74

 405.08

 405.46

 405.94

 407.38

 408.13

 316.0

 321.3

 326.8

 336.5

 344.0

 354.6

 364.5

 371.2

 376.0

 380.9

 384.4

 387.4

 391.0

 394.1

 397.2

 398.8

 400.3

 400.2

 401.4

 402.5

 404.7

 405.8

 406.5

 407.7

 409.3

 411.8

 414.2

 416.9

 420.3

 430.6

 436.0

STORAGE

+11.0

+5.3

+5.5

+9.6

+7.5

+10.7

+9.9

+6.7

+4.8

+4.9

+3.4

+3.1

+3.5

+3.2

+3.0

+1.6

+1.5

-0.1

+1.2

+1.1

+2.1

+1.1

+0.7

+1.3

+1.5

+2.5

+2.4

+2.7

+3.4

+10.3

+5.4

CHANGE

5,928

2,954

3,149

5,420

4,922

5,795

5,486

3,875

2,900

3,186

2,829

2,300

2,337

2,163

2,076

1,364

1,379

1,428

1,297

1,200

1,507

1,167

1,000

1,248

1,336

1,805

1,812

1,888

2,696

5,610

3,275

INFLOW

 342

 198

 296

 499

 1,084

 379

 431

 410

 402

 640

 1,028

 637

 457

 461

 460

 428

 506

 1,363

 616

 534

 309

 493

 533

 494

 456

 477

 555

 477

 911

 302

 449

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 35

 44

 50

 52

 46

 25

 44

 59

 59

 60

 57

 54

 55

 56

 68

 77

 78

 67

 62

 73

 84

 88

 90

 89

 73

 58

 54

 52

 53

 56

 60

PUMPING

 16

 16

 16

 10

 8

 19

 24

 24

 18

 14

 27

 52

 53

 37

 30

 32

 33

 33

 26

 35

 33

 28

 28

 31

 31

 0

 0

 2

 19

 39

 22

C.F.S.

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .05

 .04

 .09

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .06

 .12

 .23

 .23

 .16

 .13

 .14

 .14

 .14

 .11

 .15

 .14

 .12

 .12

 .13

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .08

 .16

 .09

INCHES

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .29

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .79

 .04

 .00

 1.35

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +130.8 85,332 16,627 0 0 1,878 756 3.31 3.14

ACRE-FEET +130,800 169,256 32,980 0 0 3,725 1,500

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 32,980

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 3,725

TOTAL 36,705

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE = 13.02

 305.0

OUTLET 0 3.14
#### OIL-ELEC-TRIC ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FAHRENDORF, et al, Respondents.

(265 N. W. 4.)

(File No. 7854.

Opinion filed February 7, 1936.)

*Van Slyke & Agor,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Churchill & Benson,*of Huron, and *Fletcher & Fletcher,*of Aberdeen, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought suit against the defendants as indorsers to recover upon a $7,500 promissory note. Upon the trial of the issues in the circuit court, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. At or about the time this action was brought against the defendants, another plaintiff holding a $7,500 companion promissory note instituted an action in the circuit court. Bioth notes were indorsed at the same time and were a part of the same transaction. The facts as to the making and indorsing of said notes, the issues, and the defenses thereto, are fully stated in Wilbur Trust Co. v. Fahrendorf et al, 64 S. D. 124, 265 N. W. 1, decided February 5, 1936.

An examination of the record's in both cases shows that the fact and law questions that must govern the disposition of this case were decided in the opinion handed down by this court in Wilbur Trust Co. v. Fahrendorf et al, supra.

We therefore, upon authority contained therein, sustain and affirm the judgment and order overruling the motion for a new trial herein.

All the judges concur.
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 217 Filed 11/07/19 Entered 11/07/19 14:39:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 217 Filed 11/07/19 Entered 11/07/19 14:39:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 446.98

 447.59

 448.16

 448.84

 449.43

 449.90

 450.51

 450.98

 451.44

 451.71

 451.94

 452.18

 452.35

 452.58

 452.80

 453.10

 453.43

 453.87

 454.17

 454.45

 454.54

 454.65

 454.73

 454.87

 455.06

 455.29

 455.45

 455.52

 455.57

 455.67

 455.69

 774.9

 781.1

 786.8

 793.7

 799.7

 804.5

 810.8

 815.6

 820.4

 823.1

 825.5

 828.0

 829.8

 832.2

 834.5

 837.6

 841.0

 845.6

 848.8

 851.7

 852.7

 853.8

 854.7

 856.1

 858.1

 860.6

 862.3

 863.0

 863.5

 864.6

 864.8

STORAGE

+6.5

+6.1

+5.8

+6.9

+6.0

+4.8

+6.3

+4.8

+4.8

+2.8

+2.4

+2.5

+1.8

+2.4

+2.3

+3.1

+3.4

+4.6

+3.1

+2.9

+0.9

+1.2

+0.8

+1.5

+2.0

+2.4

+1.7

+0.7

+0.5

+1.1

+0.2

CHANGE

4,493

4,302

4,223

4,772

4,355

3,682

4,355

3,672

4,718

3,392

2,879

3,001

2,492

3,145

3,147

3,395

3,535

4,236

3,447

3,130

2,236

2,454

2,272

2,648

2,924

2,888

2,547

2,767

2,491

2,414

2,184

INFLOW

 1,017

 1,006

 1,085

 1,056

 1,111

 1,077

 990

 1,030

 1,134

 1,784

 1,484

 1,537

 1,422

 1,690

 1,741

 1,571

 1,547

 1,614

 1,552

 1,312

 1,514

 1,581

 1,557

 1,594

 1,620

 1,356

 1,444

 2,136

 1,942

 1,588

 1,750

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 4

 1,000

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 12

 3

 4

 6

 9

 7

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 112

 145

 156

 158

 132

 119

 128

 129

 148

 153

 146

 126

 139

 157

 160

 164

 163

 157

 163

 157

 154

 168

 169

 169

 170

 165

 156

 163

 167

 172

 188

PUMPING

 83

 53

 81

 81

 81

 68

 75

 75

 41

 48

 51

 82

 41

 93

 93

 86

 86

 146

 146

 177

 91

 122

 122

 143

 119

 129

 91

 91

 109

 112

 133

C.F.S.

 .25

 .16

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .20

 .22

 .22

 .12

 .14

 .15

 .24

 .12

 .27

 .27

 .25

 .25

 .42

 .42

 .51

 .26

 .35

 .35

 .41

 .34

 .37

 .26

 .26

 .31

 .32

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2022 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +96.3 102,196 44,842 1,057 0 4,753 2,949 8.54 .03

ACRE-FEET +96,300 202,706 88,944 2,097 0 9,428 5,849

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 768.4

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 88,944

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 2,097

 9,428

TOTAL 100,469

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2021 TO DATE = 23.60

OUTLET 0 .03

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 23.55
§ 19.428 Reconsignment. ( a ) A consignor may reconsign a shipment of spirits or specially denatured spirits withdrawn free of tax under § 19.424. The shipment may be reconsigned while in transit or upon arrival at the consignee's premises for any bona fide reason. The consignor may reconsign the shipment: ( 1 ) To himself;
( 2 ) To a proprietor for return to bonded premises under § 19.454; or
( 3 ) To another consignee holding a valid permit issued under part 20 or 22 of this chapter.
( b ) In the case of reconsignment to a proprietor for return to bonded premises under § 19.454, the distilled spirits plant proprietor who will return the spirits to bond must file a consent of surety on form TTB F 5000.18 to extend the terms of the operations or unit bond to cover the return of the spirits.
( c ) When a consignor reconsigns a shipment, the consignor must cancel the initial record of shipment and prepare a new record of shipment marked “Reconsignment”. The consignor must annotate the copies of the canceled record of shipment and the new record of shipment to cross-reference each other.
(26 U.S.C. 5201)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  BKD, llp
(No. 74-CC-187

#### Century Machine Shop, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 17, 1973.*

Century Machine Shop, Claimant, pro se.

*183William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In re: Karen Debuiser Maskew Case No: 20-33538

CERTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO COMMENCE PAYMENTS

UNDER THE CHAPTER 13 PLAN

The above debtor(s) have failed to commence payments under the Chapter 13 plan as 

required by 11 U.S.C. 1326(a)(1) within thirty(30) days after the petition was filed. Pursuant to 

Local Rule 3070-1(C), the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee in this case is certifying that failure to the 

Clerk of Court.

/s/Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee 

 

Date: October 29, 2020

 

Certificate

I hereby certify that on October 29, 2020, I have mailed or hand-delivered a true copy of the

above Certification to the Debtor(s), Karen Debuiser Maskew, 7751 Waterford Drive, Spotsylvania, 

VA 22551 and electronically sent to attorney for the Debtor(s), SRESEARCH39@aol.com.

 

/s/Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee

Case 20-33538-KRH Doc 19 Filed 10/29/20 Entered 10/29/20 11:04:12 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 86.100 What must the IHE's drug prevention program include? The IHE's drug prevention program must, at a minimum, include the following: ( a ) The annual distribution in writing to each employee, and to each student who is taking one or more classes for any type of academic credit except for continuing education units, regardless of the length of the student's program of study, of— ( 1 ) Standards of conduct that clearly prohibit, at a minimum, the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students and employees on its property or as part of any of its activities;
( 2 ) A description of the applicable legal sanctions under local, State, or Federal law for the unlawful possession or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol;
( 3 ) A description of the health risks associated with the use of illicit drugs and the abuse of alcohol;
( 4 ) A description of any drug or alcohol counseling, treatment, or rehabilitation or re-entry programs that are available to employees or students; and
( 5 ) A clear statement that the IHE will impose disciplinary sanctions on students and employees (consistent with local, State, and Federal law), and a description of those sanctions, up to and including expulsion or termination of employment and referral for prosecution, for violations of the standards of conduct required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section. For the purpose of this section, a disciplinary sanction may include the completion of an appropriate rehabilitation program.
( b ) A biennial review by the IHE of its program to— ( 1 ) Determine its effectiveness and implement changes to the program if they are needed; and
( 2 ) Ensure that the disciplinary sanctions described in paragraph (a)(5) of this section are consistently enforced.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0522) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1145g)
Exhibit
10.1


 


SUMMARY OF ANNUAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAM


ImmunoGen does not have a
formal incentive or bonus plan for executives. 
The Compensation Committee of the our Board of Directors does, however,
annually establish key performance criteria, based upon the corporate goals and
objectives, to be met by the Company, and may also establish individual
objectives for our executives.  The
Compensation Committee evaluates the Company’s and the individual’s actual
performance against those criteria and, where applicable, individual
objectives, in its determination of whether cash incentive or bonus payments
should be made to our executives.  Key
performance criteria may include any or all of the following: (i) our actual financial
performance against our plan for the applicable fiscal year; (ii) meeting
certain research and development milestones, including internal product
development advancement; and (iii) meeting key targets associated with its
collaborations with third parties, including support of partner programs and
business development.


Each executive is eligible
to receive a target bonus expressed as a percentage of his or her annual base
salary which, once set, remains at that level for each subsequent year unless
specifically changed by the Compensation Committee.  The actual bonus amount for each executive is
determined based on both the Company’s actual performance against its key
performance criteria and, if applicable, the executive’s level of
accomplishment against his or her predetermined individual performance goals
and objectives.  When evaluating the
performance of individual executives, the Compensation Committee also considers
factors such as changes in business conditions and other relevant external circumstances.  At the discretion of the Compensation
Committee, bonuses in excess of the calculated result may be made for
exceptional performance or other similar reasons.


The Compensation Committee
may set a threshold percentage of Company achievement against its key
performance criteria below which bonuses based on Company performance will not
be payable.  Assuming the threshold
percentage has been achieved, the portion of the executives’ target bonuses
tied to Company performance is earned on a pro-rata basis up to achievement of
100% of the Company objectives. 
Additional Company performance objectives may also be set by the
Compensation Committee that, if achieved, could result in bonus payments in
excess of 100% of the portion of an executive’s target bonus based on Company
performance.  Where applicable, the
individual objectives portion of the executives’ target bonuses may be earned
irrespective of whether the threshold for payment of the Company performance
bonuses has been achieved or the extent to which the bonuses based on Company
performance are payable.
### §67. Repealed. Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, §4(a)(24), 70 Stat. 947

Section, R.S. §258, provided for a report to each session of Congress by the Secretary on customhouse business and is covered by section 331 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
#### § 19.385 Making alcohol or water solutions of denaturants.

If a proprietor uses a denaturant that is difficult to dissolve in spirits at normal working temperatures, that is highly volatile, or that becomes solid at normal working temperature, the proprietor may liquefy or dissolve the denaturant in a small amount of spirits or water prior to its use in the production of denatured spirits. However, the proof of the denatured spirits produced must not fall below the proof required by the approved formula. In addition, if alcohol is used as a solvent, the proprietor must include this additional alcohol in calculating the total quantity of spirits denatured in the batch.

(26 U.S.C. 5242)