alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         320,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  754,103<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,594,464
<PP&E>                                       1,475,284<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,090,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,117,230
<BONDS>                                        615,795<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (1,642,243)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,090,782
<SALES>                                      2,075,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,075,407
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (18,352,988)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,255,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,623)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,262,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $10,399.
<F2>Net of depreciation.
<F3>Minority interest in subsidiaries.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 434.82

 434.65

 434.47

 434.30

 434.12

 433.81

 433.53

 433.17

 432.81

 432.43

 432.02

 431.69

 431.35

 430.98

 430.60

 430.23

 429.93

 429.59

 429.22

 428.82

 428.52

 428.05

 427.61

 427.13

 426.67

 426.15

 425.71

 425.32

 424.89

 424.50

 424.06

 657.5

 655.9

 654.3

 652.7

 651.0

 648.2

 645.6

 642.3

 639.0

 635.6

 631.8

 628.9

 625.8

 622.4

 619.0

 615.7

 613.0

 610.0

 606.7

 603.2

 600.5

 596.4

 592.5

 588.3

 584.3

 579.8

 576.0

 572.6

 569.0

 565.6

 561.9

STORAGE

-0.6

-1.6

-1.7

-1.6

-1.7

-2.9

-2.6

-3.3

-3.3

-3.5

-3.7

-3.0

-3.1

-3.3

-3.4

-3.3

-2.7

-3.0

-3.3

-3.5

-2.6

-4.1

-3.9

-4.2

-4.0

-4.5

-3.8

-3.4

-3.7

-3.3

-3.8

CHANGE

1,856

1,505

1,536

1,355

1,355

721

813

896

780

934

596

797

958

761

808

765

1,018

912

762

634

1,080

342

433

310

381

354

525

757

608

706

898

INFLOW

 1,891

 2,015

 2,104

 1,882

 1,921

 1,885

 1,827

 2,281

 2,154

 2,401

 2,205

 2,023

 2,203

 2,181

 2,243

 2,197

 2,144

 2,210

 2,201

 2,168

 2,164

 2,179

 2,144

 2,179

 2,134

 2,358

 2,174

 2,204

 2,228

 2,148

 2,585

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 239

 233

 230

 225

 226

 236

 232

 228

 223

 216

 213

 221

 232

 210

 223

 196

 183

 180

 183

 203

 204

 204

 194

 201

 210

 222

 214

 213

 196

 184

 169

PUMPING

 52

 49

 40

 40

 46

 37

 49

 52

 61

 61

 60

 57

 72

 54

 60

 45

 45

 47

 38

 50

 47

 50

 38

 47

 55

 49

 52

 32

 46

 51

 37

C.F.S.

 .17

 .16

 .13

 .13

 .15

 .12

 .16

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .20

 .19

 .24

 .18

 .20

 .15

 .15

 .16

 .13

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .13

 .16

 .19

 .17

 .18

 .11

 .16

 .18

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 24, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -96.4 26,156 66,633 0 0 6,543 1,519 5.10 .00

ACRE-FEET -96,400 51,880 132,167 0 0 12,978 3,013

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 132,167

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 12,978

TOTAL 145,145

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = .32

 658.1

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 8, 2021
No. 04-21-00421-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., J.V.C., AND J.P.C. III, CHILDREN From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00604 Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s September 2, 2021 order terminating appellant’s parental rights. When an appeal is accelerated, the notice of appeal is due within twenty days after the appealable order is signed. T EX
. R. A PP . P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b). The filing of a request for findings of fact or a motion for new trial does not extend the time to perfect an accelerated appeal. T EX
. R. A PP . P. 28.1(b); In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 925-27 (Tex. 2005). The court may grant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal if the notice and a motion for extension of time are filed within fifteen days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. T EX
. R. A PP . P. 26.3, 28.1(b). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 615 (1997) (construing predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. See id. ; T EX
. R. A PP . P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); see Hone v. Hanafin , 104 S.W.3d 884, 886- 87 (Tex. 2003) (holding “a reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional, but was result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance, and “any conduct short of deliberate or intentional noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance”). The notice of appeal was due September 22, 2021, twenty days after the trial court’s order was signed, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later on October 7, 2021. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 26.1(b), 26.3. Appellant J.Y.G. filed the notice of appeal on September 28, 2021 but did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. We therefore order a response due by October 25, 2021 offering a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 42.3(a), (c). Appellant has the burden to request the trial court clerk prepare a supplemental clerk’s recordcontaining all necessary pleadings and orders to establish this court’s jurisdiction. Appellant

must file a copy of any such request with this court. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 19.52 Restrictions on location of plants. A person who intends to establish a distilled spirits plant may not locate it in any of the following places: ( a ) In any residence, shed, yard, or enclosure connected to a residence;
( b ) On any vessel or boat;
( c ) Where beer or wine is produced;
( d ) Where liquors are sold at retail; or
( e ) Where any other business is conducted except as provided in § 19.54.
(26 U.S.C. 5178)
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3502

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Mario Partida-Esparza, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 30, 2001 Filed: June 4, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mario Partida-Esparza pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 denied his request for a mitigating-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, and sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment

and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Partida-Esparza challenges the court’s denial of the requested reduction.-2-

We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that PartidaEsparza was neither a minimal nor a minor participant. See United States v. White , 241 F.3d 1015, 1024 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). It took into account his participation in the offense of conviction and another drug sale that was treated as relevant conduct, and compared it to the participation of the others involved. See id. The court properly limited its consideration to these two incidents. See United States v. Velasquez , 141 F.3d 1280, 1283 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 897 (1998). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Jon D. Berkley                                                      | Dated:  |  November      23, 2009 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------|
|   | Jon      D. Berkley                                                          |         |                         |
| Title: | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |         |                         |
|   |                                                                         |         |                         |
|   |                                                                         |         |                         |
| By:    | /s/      Bruce A. Shepard                                                    | Dated:  |  November      23, 2009 |
|   | Bruce      A. Shepard                                                        |         |                         |
| Title: | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer)               |         |                         |
EXHIBIT 3.83
 Delaware  
  The First State
  
 /s/ Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State

Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State
 2955708 8100
    
    AUTHENTICATION: 9356189981398088
    
    Date: 10-15-98




---



##### 



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
 Delaware Limited Liability Company Act
     By:
    /s/ John M. Franck IIName:
    John M. Franck IITitle:
    Authorized Person STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 09:00 AM 10/15/1998
981398088  2955708
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric Danon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Elva  International,
Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

     6. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 17, 2004

/s/ Eric Danon
-----------------------------------------------
Eric Danon
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,248

 1,260

 1,265

 1,319

 1,357

 1,470

 1,615

 1,616

 1,546

 1,554

 1,534

 1,364

 1,271

 1,262

 1,187

 1,164

 1,139

 1,105

 1,083

 1,050

 1,016

 983

 953

 897

 849

 823

 802

 784

 766

 793

 770

 1,000

 1,007

 920

 1,027

 1,047

 1,069

 1,084

 1,075

 1,044

 961

 1,068

 969

 955

 977

 981

 990

 1,006

 943

 878

 923

 817

 899

 836

 776

 768

 745

 704

 717

 635

 710

 672

 1,128

 1,107

 1,092

 1,140

 1,167

 1,227

 1,291

 1,294

 1,265

 1,299

 1,287

 1,168

 1,111

 1,135

 1,098

 1,070

 1,071

 1,050

 1,018

 997

 956

 953

 897

 847

 827

 801

 778

 760

 724

 748

 720

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 464.04

 463.72

 463.30

 463.28

 463.47

 463.56

 463.41

 463.40

 464.16

 464.89

 465.40

 465.41

 465.39

 465.24

 465.08

 464.86

 464.69

 464.46

 464.07

 463.63

 463.04

 462.58

 462.21

 462.09

 462.11

 462.04

 462.00

 461.88

 461.91

 462.01

 955.2

 951.6

 947.0

 946.8

 948.9

 949.9

 948.2

 948.1

 956.5

 964.6

 970.3

 970.4

 970.2

 968.5

 966.7

 964.3

 962.4

 959.8

 955.5

 950.6

 944.1

 939.1

 935.0

 933.7

 933.9

 933.1

 932.7

 931.4

 931.7

 932.8

STORAGE

-4.0

-3.5

-4.6

-0.2

+2.1

+1.0

-1.7

-0.1

+8.4

+8.1

+5.7

+0.1

-0.2

-1.7

-1.8

-2.4

-1.9

-2.6

-4.3

-4.9

-6.5

-5.1

-4.1

-1.3

+0.2

-0.8

-0.4

-1.3

+0.3

+1.1

CHANGE

11,032

11,263

9,970

9,117

9,078

8,669

7,560

7,357

10,846

10,549

9,140

8,423

8,334

7,580

7,525

7,337

7,748

7,500

6,591

6,390

5,588

4,939

5,164

4,651

4,654

4,220

3,917

3,559

4,182

4,261

INFLOW

 8,030

 8,178

 8,052

 8,063

 7,571

 6,703

 8,033

 7,131

 6,367

 6,183

 5,972

 8,024

 8,076

 8,043

 8,048

 8,251

 8,480

 8,512

 8,447

 8,485

 8,484

 6,975

 6,753

 4,867

 4,175

 4,236

 3,734

 3,851

 3,646

 3,309

POWER

 4,679

 4,507

 3,888

 788

 84

 1,107

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 24

 159

 85

 83

 0

 0

 32

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 259

 261

 267

 268

 264

 267

 262

 223

 188

 203

 223

 251

 259

 270

 266

 220

 201

 226

 237

 264

 271

 260

 275

 271

 275

 269

 278

 281

 284

 299

PUMPING

 77

 99

 99

 109

 102

 91

 99

 58

 59

 81

 81

 92

 111

 110

 110

 99

 18

 48

 88

 91

 91

 91

 98

 94

 94

 102

 94

 87

 87

 102

C.F.S.

 .21

 .27

 .27

 .30

 .28

 .25

 .27

 .16

 .16

 .22

 .22

 .25

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .27

 .05

 .13

 .24

 .25

 .25

 .25

 .27

 .26

 .26

 .28

 .26

 .24

 .24

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .58

 .58

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -26.4 217,144 204,679 15,436 0 7,642 2,662 7.29 1.30

ACRE-FEET -26,400 430,705 405,981 30,617 0 15,158 5,280

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 405,981

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 30,617

 15,158

TOTAL 451,756

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 30.28

 959.1

OUTLET 0 1.30

Table 11
#### Adam Frank v. Rowland & Shafto and Another.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §3110. Study on telecommunications competitiveness in United States

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission and the United States Trade Representative, shall conduct a study of the competitiveness of the United States telecommunications industry and the effects of foreign telecommunications policies and practices on such industry in order to assist the Congress and the President in determining what actions might be necessary to preserve the competitiveness of the United States telecommunications industry.

#### (b) Public comment

The Secretary of Commerce may, as appropriate, provide notice and reasonable opportunity for public comment as part of the study conducted under subsection (a).

#### (c) Report

The Secretary of Commerce shall, by no later than the date that is 1 year after August 23, 1988, submit to the Congress and the President a report on the findings and recommendations reached by the Secretary of Commerce as a result of the study conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall be referred to the appropriate committees of the House of Representatives and of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1381, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1224.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Pathobiology of Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: May 3, 2011.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alexander Parsadanian, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20706172736164616e69616e61606e69610e6e69680e676f76"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0f0e1f2f3e1e4e1eee9e1eee1e0eee9e18eeee9e88ee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-8186 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>