alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                       232
<INVENTORY>                                      1,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,510
<PP&E>                                         330,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,894
<BONDS>                                        127,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,148
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    51.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 184

 182

 188

 187

 187

 194

 197

 194

 186

 179

 177

 182

 180

 175

 175

 174

 180

 180

 183

 189

 195

 192

 193

 192

 194

 199

 201

 201

 200

 200

 172

 173

 175

 176

 178

 180

 179

 173

 161

 158

 154

 153

 157

 159

 161

 161

 164

 168

 169

 171

 173

 176

 178

 182

 183

 184

 186

 188

 190

 191

 176

 177

 179

 180

 182

 186

 188

 186

 175

 169

 163

 162

 165

 167

 168

 167

 171

 173

 174

 177

 180

 182

 183

 185

 186

 188

 191

 193

 193

 194

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 3,041

 2,941

 2,849

 2,763

 2,679

 2,616

 2,567

 2,538

 2,516

 2,501

 2,487

 2,474

 2,464

 2,455

 2,447

 2,437

 2,429

 2,422

 2,414

 2,405

 2,397

 2,393

 2,401

 2,417

 2,440

 2,466

 2,492

 2,518

 2,543

 2,570

 217

 210

 204

 197

 191

 187

 183

 181

 180

 179

 178

 177

 176

 175

 175

 174

 174

 173

 172

 172

 171

 171

 172

 173

 174

 176

 178

 180

 182

 184

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 24.256 Bottle aging wine.

Wine bottled or packed and stored for the purpose of aging need not have labels affixed until the wine is removed for consumption or sale. However, the bins, pallets, stacks, cases or containers of unlabeled wine will be marked in some manner to show the kind (class and type) and alcohol content of the wine. If the unlabeled wine is stored at a location other than the bottling or packing winery, the registry number of the bottling or packing winery will also be shown.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended, 1407, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5368, 5662))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0503)
#### § 97.113 Suspension or Termination of IRB Approval of Research.

An IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the department or agency head.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
(No. 78-CC-0015

#### Illinois Valley Sheltered Workshop, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 9, 1978.*

*759This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent to dismiss, and the Court being fully advised in the premises.

It is hereby ordered that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, denied.

It is further ordered, in view of the departmental report herein which admits liability on this claim, that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $360.00 in full satisfaction of its claim.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of RadNet, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Mark D.
Stolper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


                                        /s/    Mark D. Stolper
                                        ----------------------
                                        Mark D. Stolper
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        March 31, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1
 WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND
SUBSIDIARIES EMPLOYEES
SAVINGS PLAN
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman
 
  21
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Progress Financial Corporation
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge the
Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                            /s/    Michael B. High
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  Michael B. High
                                            Title: Chief Operating Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 12, 2003
#### § 24.26 Authority to approve.

The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to approve, except as otherwise provided in this part, all applications, bonds, consents of surety, qualifying documents, claims, and any other documents required by or filed under this part, whether for original establishment, for changes subsequent to establishment, for discontinuance of business, for remission, abatement, credit, or refund of tax, or for any other purpose.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1378, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5351))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0292)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. Jordan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation
and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                        | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | Dated: November 9, 2012                                | 
| |                                                        | 
| | /s/ John P. Jordan                                     | 
| |                                                        | 
| | John P. Jordan                                         | 
| | Vice
 President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| | of Zygo
 Corporation                                   | 

---
(No. 74-CC-383

#### Springfield Catholic Charities, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 17, 1974.*

*357William P. Sheehan, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Rocky Babcock seeks relief from the following specific sections of Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulation:

61.23

Medical Certificates: Requirement and duration

61.101(e)(4) and (5)

Recreational pilot privileges and limitations

61.113(a)

Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in Command

61.315(a)

What are the privileges and limitations of my sport pilot certificate?

91.7(a)

Civil aircraft airworthiness

91.119(c)

Minimum safe altitudes: General

91.121

Altimeter settings.

91.151(a)(1)

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

91.405(a)

Maintenance required.

91.407(a)(1)

Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration.

91.409(a)(1) and (2)

Inspections

91.417(a) and (b)

Maintenance records.

Rocky Babcock submits this request in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-

334 pursuing abatement from any current applicable FARS operating before me. I do intend to 

use the UAS for compensation for areal photogrophy, videogrphay and surveying provided for 

intended individuals or groups that wish to utilize my services. 
The Inspire 1 meets the classification requirements in the Reform Act in Section 332 pertaining 

to civil unmaned aircraft in to national airspace. The Inspire 1 also meets the definition of ‘small 

unmanned aircraft’ as defined in section 331.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      $1,441,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,605,127
<PP&E>                                       1,758,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                (308,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,285,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          995,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       202,597
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,285,413
<SALES>                                        182,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               432,363
<CGS>                                          141,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,595,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,274,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,274,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,274,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.47)



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.22 Formula No. 18.

To every 100 gallons of ethyl alcohol of not less than 160 proof add:

2.50 gallons of either methyl isobutyl ketone, mixed isomers of nitropropane, or methyl *n-* butyl ketone;

0.125 gallon of pyronate or a similar compound;

0.50 gallon acetaldol (beta-hydroxybutyraldehyde); and

1.00 gallon of either kerosene, deodorized kerosene, gasoline, unleaded gasoline, rubber hydrocarbon solvent, or heptane.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. GIFFEN, Appellant.

(267 N. W. 229.)

(File No. 7846.

Opinion filed May 26, 1936.)

*Atwater & Helm,*of Sturgis, for Appellant.

*Walter Conway,*Attorney General, *Laurence Dimsddle,*Assistant Attorney General, and *John P. Everett,*State’s Attorney, of Sturgis, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant of the crime of arson. The defense is the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

*431The property that was burned was owned by defendant and was insured against loss 'by fire. Evidence was introduced by the state tending to show that defendant approached two different parties with the proposition that they burn the property in order that she might collect the fire insurance.

 It was incumbent upon the state to prove that the fire was of incendiary origin, and that the defendant or some one acting on her behalf caused the fire. The evidence is wholly circumstantial and the defendant claims that: “Conceding all the facts and circumstances proven by the state to be true, they are not inconsistent with the innocence of the defendant.” The rule established for such cases by this court is as follows: “To warrant a conviction for crime on circumstantial evidence alone, the circumstances taken together should be of a conclusive nature, and leading, on the whole, to a satisfactory conclusion, and pointing to a moral certainty that the accused committed the offense charged; and it is invariably the rule of law that, to warrant a conviction upon circumstantial evidence alone, such facts and circumstances must be shown as are consistent with each other, and consistent with the guilt of the party charged, and such as cannot by any reasonable theory be true and the party charged be innocent; and in this case, if all the facts and circumstances relied upon by the state to secure a conviction can be reasonably accounted for upon any theory consistent with the innocence of the defendant, then the jury should acquit the defendant.” State v. Guffey, 39 S. D. 84, 163 N. W. 679, approved in State v. Guffy, 50 S. D. 548, 210 N. W. 980.

In this case the circumstances shown by the state are as consistent with the innocence of the defendant as with her guilt; therefore the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction and the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur.
### subpart 1—federal administration
### Part D—Access Demonstration Programs
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 260

 381

 258

 474

 675

 1,100

 1,423

 2,039

 1,657

 2,567

 3,346

 3,054

 2,950

 1,765

 861

 1,032

 980

 1,733

 2,283

 2,745

 3,196

 3,248

 2,794

 2,893

 2,928

 2,680

 2,058

 1,707

 1,391

 1,939

 1,809

 191

 186

 183

 183

 185

 189

 198

 212

 234

 255

 269

 320

 284

 277

 233

 226

 212

 216

 221

 234

 271

 302

 298

 371

 347

 395

 378

 390

 362

 331

 296

 207

 210

 193

 205

 236

 285

 375

 541

 513

 703

 870

 890

 834

 536

 356

 326

 289

 378

 436

 553

 803

 823

 718

 787

 716

 825

 689

 564

 540

 543

 459

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 6,270

 6,033

 5,844

 5,535

 5,376

 5,333

 4,996

 4,600

 4,485

 4,753

 5,225

 5,766

 6,303

 6,598

 6,747

 6,863

 6,959

 7,132

 7,332

 7,600

 8,028

 8,310

 8,515

 8,599

 8,445

 8,380

 8,235

 8,263

 8,447

 8,664

 8,834

 448

 431

 417

 395

 384

 381

 357

 329

 320

 340

 373

 412

 450

 471

 482

 490

 497

 509

 524

 543

 573

 594

 608

 614

 603

 599

 588

 590

 603

 619

 631

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 10.1
 LIMITED WAIVER AGREEMENT
 Borrower Term Loan Agreement
   The requirement of Section 6.07(b) of the Term Loan Agreement is hereby waived for fiscal
quarters ending June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011. PROVIDED, for purposes of subsection
(a) of the definition of Applicable Rate set forth in Section 1.01 of the Term Loan
Agreement, commencing July 1, 2011, the Leverage Ratio shall be deemed to be greater than
5.00 to 1.00 until but not including the first Business Day immediately following the date a
compliance certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 5.01(d) certifying that the Leverage
Ratio is less than or equal to 5.00 to 1.00




---



##### 



,
 DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.By:
    DEP HOLDINGS, LLC, General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Bryan F. BulawaBryan F. BulawaSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and  Treasurer WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Administrative Agent and a LenderBy:
    /s/ Mark OberreuterName:
    Mark OberreuterTitle:
    Vice President AGREED TO THIS 30th DAY OF JUNE, 2011:Bank of America, N. A.Name of LenderBy:
    /s/ Joseph ScottName:
    Joseph ScottTitle:
    Director




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ John FrazellName:
    John FrazellTitle:
    Director   By:
    /s/ William S. RogersName:
    William S. RogersTitle:
    Authorized Signatory   By:
    /s/ May HuangName:
    May HuangTitle:
    Assistant Vice President   By:
    /s/ Yasantha GunaratnaName:
    Yasantha GunaratnaTitle:
    Vice President   By:
    /s/ Evan UhlickName:
    Evan UhlickTitle:
    Vice President By:
    /s/ Giacomo LandiName:
    Giacomo LandiTitle:
    Senior Vice President   By:
    /s/ Kenneth J. FaturName:
    Kenneth J. FaturTitle:
    Managing Director




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Leon MoName:
    Leon MoTitle:
    Authorized Signatory   By:
    /s/ Susan SaxeName:
    Susan SaxeTitle:
    Authorized Signatory   By:

/s/
Brian D. WilliamsName:
    Brian D. WilliamsTitle:
    Authorized Signatory   By:
    /s/ Irja R. OtsaName:
    Irja R. OtsaTitle:
    Associate Director By:
    /s/ Mary E. EvansName:
    Mary E. EvansTitle:
    Associate Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,075

 1,068

 1,028

 993

 1,018

 1,040

 1,086

 1,146

 1,121

 1,136

 1,102

 1,038

 886

 887

 826

 929

 886

 881

 887

 897

 891

 928

 960

 986

 1,040

 1,052

 1,053

 1,015

 1,008

 998

 822

 821

 830

 837

 851

 866

 840

 867

 839

 815

 800

 790

 351

 591

 679

 726

 710

 713

 715

 704

 702

 727

 712

 710

 713

 706

 714

 720

 739

 761

 940

 931

 916

 909

 923

 945

 948

 979

 958

 951

 932

 893

 706

 810

 765

 835

 810

 794

 793

 782

 783

 806

 817

 835

 855

 853

 859

 844

 857

 866

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          687,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,579
<OTHER-SE>                                    (198,525)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,980
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (188,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (188,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (188,823)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>