alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
 I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Las Vegas Gaming, Inc.
 
 
 
 
 By:  /s/ Russell R. Roth
 
 Name: Russell R. Roth
 
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 
 Date: November 18, 2003
 
 
 1
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 618

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/618/html/metadata.html            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Friday, August 12, 2011, 01:18:02 PM
#### BLACK HILLS FINANCE SERVICE, Inc., Respondent, v. PALMER, et al, Appellants.

(263 N. W. 628.)

(File No. 7857.

Opinion filed December 13, 1935.)

*13
      *Chas.*Milner, of 'Martin, and *W.*/. *Hooper*of Gregory for Appellants.

*Chas. H. Whitmg,*of Rapid City, ' - Respondent.

PER ‘CURIÁM.

This is an action in claim and delivery. The complaint alleges that W. Scott Chapman, the seller named in a conditional sale contract, sold, assigned, and transferred for value, all his right, title, and interest in the contract to the plaintiff; that defendants failed to make payments as specified in the contract; and that the plaintiff thereby -became entitled to the possession of the frigidaire equipment described therein. Defendants admit the execution of the contract and set out in their answer a copy without the assignment appearing on the back, but expressly allege that the defendants have no- knowledge or -information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegation of the complaint that the contract had -been assigned to the plaintiff. This instrument was offered in evidence and received without objection. Defendants moved for a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case on the ground that there was no evidence that plaintiff was an assignee of the conditional sale contract and entitled to- the possession of the property in controversy at the time of the commencement of this action. This motion was granted, and judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendants appeal from an order. granting a new trial.

It is the contention of counsel for the appellants that the assignment is no part of the contract and the introduction of the contract in evidence did not carry with it the assignment. On the other hand, respondent contends that the offer and reception of the contract was sufficiently broad to include the assignment. It is further contended that recognition by the defendants of the existence of an interest in the plaintiff obviated the necessity of proof of execution.

We have carefully considered the authorities submitted by appellants in which the inquiry related to the admission in evidence of an indorsement or an assignment by the offer and reception of an instrument without reference to- the indorsement or assignment, but we are of the opinion that under the record such inquiry is not controlling. The evidence is to the- effect that plaintiff purchased the contract in question; that assignor admitted that *14he transferred the contract; and that defendants made payments of installments to plaintiff company. This evidence and' the production of the contract at the trial was prima facie evidence of title and sufficient to entitle plaintiff to recover.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
(No. 73-CC-163

#### Aero Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April*27, *1973.*

Aero Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.59 Continuing partnerships. ( a ) *General.* If, under the laws of a particular State, a partnership is not terminated on death or insolvency of a partner, but continues until final settlement of the partnership affairs is completed, and the surviving partner has the exclusive right to the control and possession of the partnership assets for the purpose of liquidation and settlement, the surviving partner may continue to withdraw and use specially denatured spirits under the prior qualifications of the partnership.
( b ) *Requalification.* If a surviving partner acquires the business on completion of the settlement of the partnership, that partner shall qualify as a new proprietor, from the date of acquisition, under the same conditions and limitations prescribed in § 20.57(c).
( c ) *More than one partner.* The rule set forth in this section also applies if there is more than one surviving partner.
[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985; 50 FR 20099, May 14, 1985; T.D. ATF-476, 67 FR 17939, Apr. 12, 2002; T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by YouthStream
      Media Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
      31,
      2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jonathan V. Diamond, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, and Robert N. Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, do hereby certify, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











Date:
                August 30, 2006
            /s/
                JONATHAN V. DIAMONDJonathan
                V. DiamondChief
                Executive Officer








Date:
                August 30, 2006
            /s/
                ROBERT N. WEINGARTENRobert
                N. Weingarten
              Chief
                Financial Officer
### §4208. Interests of small businesses

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the United States Trade Representative should facilitate participation by small businesses in the trade negotiation process; and

(2) the functions of the Office of the United States Trade Representative relating to small businesses should continue to be reflected in the title of the Assistant United States Trade Representative assigned the responsibility for small businesses.

#### (b) Consideration of small business interests

The Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small Business, Market Access, and Industrial Competitiveness shall be responsible for ensuring that the interests of small businesses are considered in all trade negotiations in accordance with the objective described in section 4201(a)(8) of this title.

(Pub. L. 114–26, title I, §109, June 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 356.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 312

 317

 322

 311

 320

 322

 330

 328

 333

 340

 351

 380

 428

 453

 440

 437

 427

 436

 432

 423

 418

 412

 408

 406

 405

 404

 404

 400

 393

 385

 378

 235

 245

 248

 245

 249

 256

 253

 261

 278

 279

 287

 298

 286

 312

 305

 329

 328

 336

 342

 346

 346

 342

 340

 347

 355

 334

 333

 328

 323

 318

 314

 279

 284

 287

 281

 286

 290

 290

 296

 301

 317

 325

 342

 361

 380

 390

 392

 391

 393

 393

 394

 391

 382

 375

 376

 379

 377

 375

 370

 367

 362

 353

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 390.33

 390.64

 390.85

 391.08

 391.21

 391.37

 391.40

 391.43

 391.70

 392.44

 392.82

 393.04

 393.37

 393.52

 393.59

 393.75

 393.82

 393.88

 394.00

 394.37

 394.56

 394.80

 395.12

 395.31

 395.55

 395.76

 395.96

 396.17

 396.42

 396.61

 318.6

 320.4

 321.7

 323.0

 323.8

 324.8

 325.0

 325.2

 326.8

 331.3

 333.6

 334.9

 337.0

 337.9

 338.3

 339.3

 339.8

 340.1

 340.9

 343.2

 344.4

 345.9

 347.9

 349.1

 350.6

 351.9

 353.2

 354.5

 356.1

 357.3

STORAGE

+2.3

+1.8

+1.2

+1.4

+0.8

+1.0

+0.2

+0.2

+1.6

+4.5

+2.3

+1.3

+2.0

+0.9

+0.4

+1.0

+0.4

+0.4

+0.7

+2.3

+1.2

+1.5

+2.0

+1.2

+1.5

+1.3

+1.3

+1.3

+1.6

+1.2

CHANGE

1,541

1,513

1,218

1,309

1,160

1,103

703

716

1,476

2,925

1,763

1,337

1,468

911

918

1,105

868

880

975

1,773

1,198

1,392

1,615

1,257

1,410

1,307

1,257

1,289

1,280

1,202

INFLOW

 34

 214

 210

 226

 363

 212

 216

 208

 243

 257

 200

 248

 39

 39

 295

 212

 252

 299

 199

 205

 196

 229

 196

 239

 237

 278

 461

 425

 209

 348

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 352

 352

 352

 353

 353

 353

 353

 353

 353

 353

 354

 354

 354

 355

 355

 352

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 349

 350

 350

 350

 294

 96

 123

 198

 199

OUTLET

 17

 17

 26

 37

 37

 41

 43

 52

 60

 50

 41

 43

 38

 41

 38

 35

 41

 41

 43

 42

 45

 45

 40

 48

 48

 55

 52

 55

 52

 34

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 12

 10

 0

 12

 0

 0

 0

 14

 10

 10

 12

 8

 8

 4

 10

 10

 10

 13

 17

 15

 11

 11

 11

 11

 15

 9

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .08

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .04

INCHES

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .65

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +40.8 38,869 6,989 2 9,705 1,257 243 1.17 .91

ACRE-FEET +40,800 77,097 13,863 4 19,250 2,493 482

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 316.3

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 13,863

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 4

 2,493

TOTAL 35,610

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2021 TO DATE = 8.53

OUTLET 19,250 .91

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 8.48
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.

Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 397.16

 397.21

 397.15

 396.81

 396.49

 396.25

 395.86

 395.58

 394.88

 394.45

 394.02

 393.70

 393.24

 392.84

 392.26

 391.86

 391.47

 391.10

 390.65

 390.20

 389.70

 389.19

 388.61

 388.14

 387.65

 387.25

 386.83

 386.33

 385.73

 385.08

 360.9

 361.2

 360.8

 358.6

 356.6

 355.0

 352.5

 350.8

 346.4

 343.7

 341.0

 339.0

 336.2

 333.7

 330.2

 327.7

 325.4

 323.2

 320.5

 317.8

 314.8

 311.9

 308.5

 305.7

 302.9

 300.6

 298.2

 295.4

 292.0

 288.4

STORAGE

-0.2

+0.3

-0.4

-2.2

-2.0

-1.5

-2.5

-1.8

-4.4

-2.7

-2.7

-2.0

-2.8

-2.5

-3.5

-2.4

-2.4

-2.2

-2.7

-2.7

-3.0

-3.0

-3.4

-2.7

-2.8

-2.3

-2.4

-2.8

-3.4

-3.6

CHANGE

1,263

1,322

1,134

1,027

1,172

1,137

833

459

479

798

750

1,063

1,005

852

525

718

912

917

933

924

754

420

455

632

710

944

795

746

541

450

INFLOW

 1,090

 889

 1,076

 1,859

 1,938

 1,643

 1,808

 1,124

 2,470

 1,898

 1,842

 1,816

 2,182

 1,842

 2,049

 1,690

 1,819

 1,759

 2,013

 1,985

 1,975

 1,660

 1,911

 1,762

 1,886

 1,854

 1,743

 1,912

 1,982

 2,015

POWER

 0

 0

 4

 2

 1

 2

 4

 3

 1

 1

 0

 0

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 188

 192

 178

 183

 180

 181

 188

 158

 164

 184

 195

 186

 178

 177

 180

 182

 194

 194

 197

 200

 199

 193

 181

 178

 182

 183

 187

 189

 194

 200

PUMPING

 82

 78

 72

 84

 84

 84

 85

 66

 69

 69

 67

 58

 72

 72

 79

 71

 84

 88

 77

 89

 69

 78

 68

 67

 63

 63

 72

 71

 67

 64

C.F.S.

 .38

 .36

 .33

 .39

 .39

 .39

 .40

 .31

 .33

 .33

 .32

 .28

 .35

 .35

 .39

 .35

 .42

 .44

 .39

 .45

 .35

 .40

 .35

 .35

 .33

 .33

 .38

 .38

 .36

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 8, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -72.7 24,670 53,492 23 0 5,565 2,212 10.93 .00

ACRE-FEET -72,700 48,933 106,101 46 0 11,038 4,388

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 361.0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 106,101

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 46

 11,038

TOTAL 117,185

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 12.36

OUTLET 0 .00

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 12.36
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.71

 359.73

 359.73

 359.68

 359.70

 359.68

 359.70

 359.71

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.73

 359.73

 359.73

 359.77

 359.77

 359.77

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.76

 359.77

 359.77

 521

 521

 521

 521

 517

 518

 518

 515

 516

 515

 516

 517

 521

 521

 521

 521

 521

 521

 518

 518

 518

 521

 521

 521

 523

 523

 523

 523

 520

 521

 521

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

-4

+1

+0

-3

+1

-1

+1

+1

+4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-3

+0

+0

+3

+0

+0

+2

+0

+0

+0

-3

+1

+0

CHANGE

 375

 396

 349

 342

 361

 396

 386

 389

 398

 360

 316

 342

 357

 355

 355

 356

 366

 422

 395

 410

 411

 432

 433

 347

 335

 357

 360

 429

 461

 428

 436

 303

 303

 304

 304

 284

 253

 254

 233

 204

 207

 205

 220

 278

 303

 303

 305

 303

 303

 281

 252

 252

 272

 303

 303

 330

 352

 352

 353

 346

 303

 304

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2016

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 8,872 11,855

ACRE-FEET +0 0 17,598 23,514

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 50,974

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 23,514

 92,086

 521

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,504

 1,566

 1,520

 1,512

 1,534

 1,544

 1,480

 1,477

 1,453

 1,396

 1,321

 1,380

 1,456

 1,459

 1,367

 1,370

 1,417

 1,498

 1,455

 1,545

 1,566

 1,608

 1,610

 1,520

 1,529

 1,618

 1,636

 1,740

 1,762

 1,700

 1,707

 47,250

 93,720

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 17,598

 799

 841

 842

 842

 872

 875

 816

 800

 800

 802

 775

 777

 771

 767

 720

 698

 733

 755

 755

 844

 876

 877

 849

 849

 843

 880

 893

 927

 937

 941

 943

 25,699

 50,974

RIVER CANALS
### §50. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1028

Section, Joint Res. June 11, 1906, No. 27, §3, 34 Stat. 832, related to disposition of revenues from privileges.
#### Charles F. Squibb, Respondent, *v.*David M. Neuberger, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in-the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of June, 1913, denying plaintiff’s motion to make the complaint more definite and certain.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the plaintiff required to make the 5th, 6th, 7th and 9th paragraphs of the complaint more definite and certain by stating whether the agreement o'f trust therein alleged was oral or in writing, the date thereof, and, if in writing, to annex a copy thereof to the com plaint, and, if not in writing, to state the substance of the agreement. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements," and order entered as directed in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Jon D. Berkley                                                      | Dated:    | November      19, 2008 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|
|   | Jon      D. Berkley                                                          |                     |                   |
| Title: | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |                     |                   |
|   |                                                                         |                     |                   |
|   |                                                                         |                     |                   |
| By:    | /s/      Bruce A. Shepard                                                    | Dated:    | November      19, 2008 |
|   | Bruce      A. Shepard                                                        |                     |                   |
| Title: | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer)               |                     |                   |
#### § 76.141 An amendment requires the same procedures as the document being amended.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70336, Aug. 29, 2024.

If a State amends a State plan under § 76.140, the State shall use the same procedures as those it must use to prepare and submit a State plan.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
429 P.2d 656

#### Jack KELLY, Jr., Petitioner, v. Honorable Joe ANGEL, District Judge, Fourth Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8444.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 7, 1967.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and NOBLE, MOISE, COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition issued out of this Court on May-22, 1967 in this cause, be and the same is hereby made permanent.