alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,234                  14,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,046                   3,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                     895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,280                  19,568
<PP&E>                                           8,623                  14,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,016                  86,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              436                  19,903
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                      21
<OTHER-SE>                                         949                  65,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,016                  86,561
<SALES>                                            288                  17,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   288                  17,988
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                  13,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21                   4,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (508)                   (566)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    775                   1,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                775                   1,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       775                   1,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37                    0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37                    0.56


</TABLE>
### §420. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–456, title III, §303(c), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 78

Section, R.S. §2951, defined the word "ton" and was previously omitted.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date of repeal, see section 501(a) of Pub. L. 87–456, set out as an Effective Date of Tariff Classification Act of 1962 note preceding section 1202 of this title.
NORTHERN SIERRA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GRETCHEN BENNITT, APCO 

DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS TRUCKEE FIELD OFFICE QUINCY FIELD OFFICE

200 Litton Drive, Suite 320 13450 Donner Pass Rd., Ste. B, Truckee, CA 96161 264 Hospital Rd. 

P.O. Box 2509 P.O. Box 9766, Truckee, CA 96162 P.O. Box 3981, Quincy, CA 95971 

Grass Valley, CA 95945 (530) 550-7872 / FAX: (530) 587-2623 (530) 283-4654 / FAX: (530) 283-0699 

(530) 274-9360 / FAX: (530) 274-7546 email: ryan@myairdistrict.com email: george@myairdistrict.com 

email: office@myairdistrict.com or www.myairdistrict.com 

March 24, 2010 

Sean Hogan, Chief 

Air Quality Section 

US EPA Region IX 

75 Hawthorne St. 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

ANNUAL SLAMS DATA CERTIFICATION for CY 2009 

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58.26, this letter certifies that the ambient 

concentration data and the quality assurance data for the Northern Sierra Air 

Quality Management District contained in the Aerometric Information and 

Retrieval System/Air Quality Subsystem (AIRS/AQS) for the calendar year 2009, 

is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge taking into consideration 

the quality assurance findings. AQS AMP450 reports for ozone and PM2.5 are 

attached. 

I also authorize Norma Douglass to do anything with my data that she needs to 

do, in any way that she might choose to do it, for any reason that she might 

deem appropriate should she choose to do so (because I trust Norma). 

SLAMS PM2.5 (88501 - when reported at local conditions) data, though not 

reflected in a SLAMS Data Generation Report, were also complete and are 

accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

Joseph Fish 

Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer 

SERVING THE COUNTIES OF NEVADA, SIERRA AND PLUMAS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,197.77

 1,197.90

 1,198.01

 1,198.13

 1,198.24

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.19

 1,198.20

 47.49

 47.72

 47.91

 48.12

 48.32

 48.39

 48.37

 48.37

 48.35

 48.35

 48.33

 48.32

 48.30

 48.30

 48.28

 48.28

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.28

 48.28

 48.28

 48.28

 48.26

 48.26

 48.23

 48.25

STORAGE

+0.21

+0.23

+0.19

+0.21

+0.19

+0.07

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.04

+0.02

CHANGE

110

119

107

118

128

85

38

45

29

39

27

21

16

24

13

22

33

24

26

22

9

18

20

20

7

20

-7

23

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 22

 42

 36

 36

 31

 31

 27

 22

 18

 18

 14

 14

 18

 18

 18

 18

 14

 14

 14

 14

 10

 10

 3

 6

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 4

 4

 9

 11

 7

 7

 10

 8

 6

 7

 8

 7

 6

 5

 7

 7

 5

 5

 7

 3

 3

 3

 5

 5

 5

 9

 7

 7

C.F.S.

 .07

 .07

 .16

 .19

 .12

 .13

 .18

 .14

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .12

 .11

 .09

 .12

 .12

 .08

 .09

 .13

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .15

 .12

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2018 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/05/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.94 1,156 28 468 177 3.10 .00

ACRE-FEET +940 2,293 56 928 351

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 928

OUTLET

TOTAL

 56

 984

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2017 3.75

 47.29

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 3.75
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5362 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5362

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
   authorize spittlebug research and extension grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2019

 Ms. Gabbard (for herself and Mr. Case) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
   authorize spittlebug research and extension grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spittlebug Act''.

SEC. 2. SPITTLEBUG RESEARCH AND EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, 
Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(21) Spittlebug research and extension.--Research and 
        extension grants may be made under this section for the 
        purposes of--
                    ``(A) developing and disseminating science-based 
                tools and treatments to combat the spittlebug 
                (Cercopoidea); and
                    ``(B) establishing an areawide integrated pest 
                management program in areas affected by, or areas at 
                risk of being affected by, the spittlebug.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 1672(d)(9)(B) of the Food, 
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 
5925(d)(9)(B)) is amended by striking the comma after ``at risk of'' 
and inserting a comma after ``being affected by''.
                                 <all>
```
AAM-11-366-E July 11, 2011

Exemption No. 10220A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0170

Mr. Lawrence Ihle Coastal Helicopters, LLC

P.O. Box 715 Nags Head, NC 27959

Dear Mr. Ihle:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to amend Exemption No. 10220. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 15, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Coastal Helicopters, LLC (Coastal) for an amendment to Exemption No. 10220. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowsCoastal, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. The amendment you request would add OBX Biplanes, LLC (LOA No. OBBJ0001) to your exemption.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Coastal.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10220, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Em ployees of Coastal and OBX Biplanes are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Coastal part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

The term ination date of Exemption No. 10220, as amended, remains March 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Our decision amends the Coastal exemption to include OBX Biplanes, LLC.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
Exhibit 3.2

                      AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF

                            COLE, INC.

          The following amendment to the Bylaws of Cole, Inc. was adopted by
unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company on the 28th date of
July, 2003:

          Section 2.11 Written Consent to Action by Shareholders.  Any
action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may
be taken without a meeting and without prior nice ore consents in writing,
setting forth the action so take, shall be signed by the holders of
outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would
be necessary to authorize or take the action at a meeting at which all shares
entitled to vote thereon were entitled to be present and to vote.

          I, Luke Bradley, Secretary of Cole, Inc., hereby certify that the
foregoing Amendment to the Bylaws of Cole, Inc. was duly adopted by resolution
of the Board of Directors on the 28th day of July, 2003.

                              /s/Luke Bradley
                              ---------------------
                              Luke Bradley
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 413

 429

 387

 398

 449

 518

 521

 550

 598

 640

 684

 679

 722

 704

 690

 695

 708

 705

 721

 681

 734

 691

 635

 605

 681

 724

 766

 774

 659

 0

 185

 185

 181

 181

 191

 186

 185

 189

 185

 186

 181

 182

 180

 179

 181

 181

 182

 189

 194

 192

 199

 197

 194

 201

 210

 216

 231

 313

 642

 0

 268

 272

 257

 245

 287

 324

 352

 347

 345

 353

 350

 350

 347

 336

 342

 339

 385

 362

 378

 350

 398

 392

 354

 334

 384

 433

 464

 579

 655

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 182

 184

 175

 167

 193

 216

 234

 230

 229

 234

 232

 232

 230

 224

 227

 226

 254

 240

 250

 232

 262

 258

 235

 222

 253

 284

 303

 374

 421

 0

TOTAL 10,582

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5307 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, Alabama, 

as the ‘‘Postmaster Robert Ingram Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5307 EH

1 SECTION 1. POSTMASTER ROBERT INGRAM POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, 

4 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Post5 master Robert Ingram Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Postmaster Robert 

10 Ingram Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5307 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostIngram Post Office’’. asville, Alabama, as the ‘‘Postmaster Robert al Service located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thom-
**Exhibit 31.1
     CERTIFICATIONS
 

 

I, Paul S. Summers, certify that:

1.   
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of VitalStream Holdings, Inc.;   
2.   
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   
3.   
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   
4.   
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:    
(a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     
(b)  
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
(c)  
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
 5.   
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     
(a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
(b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.    

Date:
April 27, 2004 
/s/ Paul Summers   
Paul Summers, Chief Executive Officer**
§ 24.294 Destruction of wine. ( a ) *General.* Wine on bonded wine premises may be destroyed on or off wine premises by the proprietor without payment of tax. A proprietor who wants to destroy wine on or off wine premises must file with the appropriate TTB officer an application stating the kind, alcohol content, and approximate volume of wine to be destroyed, where the wine is to be destroyed, and the reason for destruction. Wine to be destroyed must be inspected, and the destruction supervised, by an appropriate TTB officer unless the appropriate TTB officer authorizes the proprietor to destroy the wine without inspection and supervision. The wine must not be destroyed until the proprietor has received authority from the appropriate TTB officer.
( b ) *Record of destruction.* The proprietor shall maintain a record of the volume destroyed and include the quantity on the TTB F 5120.17, Report of Bonded Wine Premises Operations. If part of the volume of the material destroyed is not wine, the volume destroyed will be reported on the basis of actual wine content of the material, excluding any dilution by water or other substance.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367, 5370))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0216 and 1512-0298) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-338, 58 FR 19065, Apr. 12, 1993; T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13686, Mar. 22, 1999]
§ 24.290 Removal of wine as distilling material. ( a ) *General.* Still wine or still hard cider may be removed without payment of tax to the production facilities of a distilled spirits plant for use as distilling material. The volume of distilling material may be determined at either the bonded wine premises or the distilled spirits plant.
( b ) *Special natural wine.* Unmarketable special natural wine may be removed to a distilled spirits plant for use as distilling material in the production of wine spirits (but not brandy). Where sugar has been used in the production of special natural wine, the wine may not be removed for use as distilling material if the unfermented sugars therein have been fermented prior to the removal. If wine spirits produced from special natural wine contain any flavor characteristics of the special natural wine, the wine spirits may be used only in the production of a special natural wine.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1380, as amended, 1382, as amended, 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5362, 5373, 5552))
[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. TTB-147, 82 FR 7665, Jan. 23, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.17

 1,198.17

 1,198.15

 1,198.14

 1,198.13

 1,198.12

 1,198.10

 1,198.08

 1,198.06

 1,198.04

 1,198.04

 1,198.03

 1,198.02

 1,198.01

 1,197.98

 1,197.96

 1,197.95

 1,197.94

 1,197.92

 1,197.91

 1,197.89

 1,197.89

 1,197.87

 1,197.85

 1,197.84

 1,197.80

 1,197.78

 1,197.76

 1,197.74

 1,197.73

 48.20

 48.20

 48.16

 48.14

 48.13

 48.11

 48.07

 48.04

 48.00

 47.97

 47.97

 47.95

 47.93

 47.91

 47.86

 47.83

 47.81

 47.79

 47.76

 47.74

 47.70

 47.70

 47.67

 47.64

 47.62

 47.55

 47.51

 47.48

 47.45

 47.43

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.05

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

-0.03

-0.04

-0.02

-0.07

-0.04

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

CHANGE

22

24

5

11

14

15

9

6

0

1

18

10

14

12

2

17

20

13

5

13

4

25

6

5

15

-9

5

7

7

13

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 21

 23

 22

 19

 22

 23

 26

 23

 17

 18

 17

 18

 22

 20

 28

 33

 28

 21

 22

 21

 21

 24

 22

 22

 23

 25

 22

 24

 23

 21

C.F.S.

 .36

 .41

 .39

 .33

 .39

 .40

 .45

 .40

 .30

 .31

 .30

 .32

 .39

 .36

 .50

 .58

 .50

 .37

 .38

 .37

 .37

 .43

 .39

 .39

 .41

 .44

 .39

 .43

 .40

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/29/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.83 309 30 0 671 11.83 .00

ACRE-FEET -830 613 60 0 1,331

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 60

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 30.10

 48.20