alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 463.320 Are there any requirements for networks of eligible one-stop partners or specialized centers?

Any network of one-stop partners or specialized centers, as described in § 463.300(d)(3), must be connected to the comprehensive one-stop center and any appropriate affiliate one-stop centers, for example, by having processes in place to make referrals to these centers and the partner programs located in them. Wagner-Peyser Act employment services cannot stand alone in a specialized center. Just as described in § 463.315 for an affiliated site, a specialized center must include other programs besides Wagner-Peyser Act employment services, local veterans' employment representatives, disabled veterans' outreach program specialists, and unemployment compensation.
#### § 7.1 Duty of employee to report inventions.

Every Department employee is required to report to the Secretary in accordance with the procedures established therefor, every invention made by him (whether or not jointly with others) which bears any relation to his official duties or which was made in whole or in any part during working hours, or with any contribution of Government facilities, equipment, material, funds, or information, or of time or services of other Government employees on official duty.
### Part N—Cooperative Education
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  Exhibit 21 is:  Parents  None  Subsidiaries
  Consolidated
  
  Jurisdiction
  of Incorporation
  
  Percent
  of Stock OwnedAmercoat Japan
  Company, Limited
  
  Japan
  
  100American Pipe
  & Construction International
  
  California
  
  100Ameron
  (Australia) Pty. Limited
  
  Australia
  
  100Ameron B.V.
  
  The Netherlands
  
  100Ameron
  Composites Inc.
  
  Delaware
  
  100Ameron FSC
  
  Guam
  
  100Ameron (Hong
  Kong) Ltd.
  
  Hong Kong
  
  100Ameron Malaysia
  Sdn. Bhd.
  
  Malaysia
  
  100Ameron (New
  Zealand) limited
  
  New Zealand
  
  100Ameron (Pte)
  Ltd.
  
  Singapore
  
  100Ameron (UK)
  Limited
  
  United Kingdom
  
  100Centron
  International, Inc.
  
  Delaware
  
  100Island Ready-Mix
  Concrote, Inc.
  
  Hawail
  
  100Subsidiaries
  Not Consolidated and Fifty-Percent or Less Owned CompaniesTAMCO
  
  California
  
  50Bondstrand, Ltd.
  
  Saudi Arabia
  
  40Oasis-Ameron,
  Ltd.
  
  Saudi Arabia
  
  40Ameron Saudi
  Arabia, Ltd.
  
  Saudi Arabia
  
  30  Names of other subsidiaries not consolidated
and fifty-percent or less owned companies are omitted because when considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary they do not constitute a significant
subsidiary.  EXHIBIT 21
### [§5002. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VI, §614(a)(1)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–65; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327]

Section, added act Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1115, §4, 64 Stat. 1090; amended Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §223(p), 98 Stat. 2030, provided for creation of Advisory Corrections Council.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VI, §614(b)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–65, provided that: "This section [repealing this section] shall take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 26, 1996]."
#### George Meigel, Appellant, v. E. V. Crandall Oil and Putty Manufacturing Company, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present— Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
probation affirmed where violation by probationer not refuted), and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

547 -- Parraguirre cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A • 2
(No. 77-CC-1537

#### Rice (Benney) Gibson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 28, 1977.*

*244Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.*__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### §915. Foreign diplomats, consuls or officers

Whoever, with intent to defraud within the United States, falsely assumes or pretends to be a diplomatic, consular or other official of a foreign government duly accredited as such to the United States and acts as such, or in such pretended character, demands or obtains or attempts to obtain any money, paper, document, or other thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 743; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 232 of title 22, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Foreign Relations and Intercourse (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §2, 40 Stat. 226; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, §6, 54 Stat. 80).

Reference to "jurisdiction" of the United States was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "United States" in section 5 of this title.

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
Exhibit 10.3**AMENDMENT TO:****CONSULTING AGREEMENT**(*“Agreement”)*entered into as of April 1,2003 by and between **Save the WorldAir, Inc**., a Nevada corporation (the *“Company”),*and Pat Baker *(“Consultant’).*This **Amendment**(*“Amendment”)*is in accordance with guidelines contained in **Section 11. “Amendments; Consents”**ofsaid “Agreement.”**Section 5.*****Term****of said Agreement is herewith amended as follows:*This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in accordance withthis Section 5. In addition, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the death ofConsultant, or the mental or physical incapacity of Consultant for a period of 60 consecutivedays. Either party hereto may terminate this Agreement upon material breach of this Agreement bythe other party; and the Company may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach of theConfidentiality Agreement by Consultant.All other terms and condition of said Agreement, including those contained on: ANNEXA-“CONSULTANT’S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES;” ANNEX B “CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT” and ANNEXC-“ONSULTANT’S COMPENSATION” shall remain in full force and effect.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused their respective duly authorized officer toexecute this Amendment as of April 1, 2005. The Amendment is to be attached and considered a partof said Agreement.      **CONSULTANT**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.03

 360.08

 360.13

 360.13

 360.13

 360.22

 360.22

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.22

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.19

 360.11

 360.08

 360.05

 360.00

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 537

 537

 537

 537

 537

 539

 543

 546

 546

 546

 552

 552

 550

 550

 550

 550

 552

 550

 550

 550

 550

 550

 545

 543

 541

 537

 539

 539

 539

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

+4

+3

+0

+0

+6

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

-5

-2

-2

-4

+2

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 228

 229

 225

 223

 222

 221

 267

 350

 393

 397

 429

 495

 497

 498

 498

 499

 498

 494

 490

 496

 495

 495

 472

 372

 299

 283

 223

 220

 221

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2 0 10,729 0

ACRE-FEET +2 0 21,281 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 155

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 21,436

 537

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 226

 223

 221

 224

 225

 225

 262

 327

 357

 362

 401

 465

 449

 446

 447

 445

 445

 432

 437

 444

 444

 443

 416

 334

 276

 220

 217

 220

 220

 9,853

 19,543

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 21,281

 0

 0

 2

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 14

 24

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 78

 155

RIVER CANALS
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony N. DeMint, certify that:

> 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form	10-QSB of Your Domain.com;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this	quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or	omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in	light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not	misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial	statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly	report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,	results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and	for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I am the sole officer and director	and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls	and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))	for the small business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,		or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under		my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the		small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made		known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the		period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business		issuer disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report		my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on		such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that		occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter		(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an		annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to		materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over		financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most	recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small	business issuer's auditors of the small business issuer's board of directors	(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material		weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial		reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small		business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report		financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves		management or other employees who have a significant role in the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2005

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                     

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.73

 360.55

 360.07

 360.07

 360.07

 360.07

 360.70

 360.08

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.07

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.18

 360.55

 360.07

 360.07

 360.07

 360.08

 360.07

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 588

 576

 542

 542

 542

 542

 586

 543

 576

 550

 576

 550

 576

 550

 576

 550

 576

 542

 576

 550

 576

 550

 576

 542

 542

 542

 543

 542

 543

 543

 543

STORAGE

+19

-12

-34

+0

+0

+0

+44

-43

+33

-26

+26

-26

+26

-26

+26

-26

+26

-34

+34

-26

+26

-26

+26

-34

+0

+0

+1

-1

+1

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,115

 1,539

 881

 602

 601

 601

 602

 605

 1,393

 959

 1,437

 964

 1,437

 965

 1,438

 960

 1,440

 896

 1,390

 962

 1,443

 962

 1,441

 899

 600

 601

 601

 601

 600

 603

 602

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2018 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2018

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -26 0 30,740 0

ACRE-FEET -26 0 60,973 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 0

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 60,973

 569

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 2,088

 1,514

 849

 589

 596

 602

 604

 600

 1,385

 934

 1,427

 937

 1,424

 935

 1,421

 932

 1,417

 855

 1,385

 932

 1,428

 931

 1,429

 869

 590

 594

 592

 593

 596

 604

 609

 30,261

 60,023

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 60,973

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

RIVER CANALS
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omphalos, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May
      15, 2009
              
              /s/
      Chu Pi
      YunChu
      Pi YunChief
      Financial Officer
### §1756. Regulations

The Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this chapter (other than section 1751 thereof).

(Pub. L. 86–14, §7, Apr. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 19.)
#### § 19.58 Taxpaid spirits or wines on bonded premises.

The proprietor may move tax paid or tax determined spirits or wines across bonded premises. However, tax paid or tax determined spirits or wines may not be stored or allowed to remain on the bonded premises. The proprietor must keep tax paid or tax determined spirits or wines separate from spirits or wines on which tax has not been paid or determined. Spirits returned to bonded premises under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5215 may remain on bonded premises.

(26 U.S.C. 5201 and 5612)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 475.04

 475.07

 474.77

 474.79

 474.74

 474.79

 474.92

 474.98

 475.08

 475.55

 475.07

 474.60

 474.76

 475.21

 475.69

 475.98

 475.76

 475.43

 475.56

 475.98

 476.38

 476.86

 477.45

 477.61

 477.90

 478.15

 478.21

 477.97

 477.70

 477.64

 1,230,686

 1,231,007

 1,227,796

 1,228,010

 1,227,475

 1,228,010

 1,229,401

 1,230,044

 1,231,114

 1,236,150

 1,231,007

 1,225,978

 1,227,689

 1,232,507

 1,237,652

 1,240,764

 1,238,403

 1,234,864

 1,236,258

 1,240,764

 1,245,086

 1,250,254

 1,256,615

 1,258,342

 1,261,474

 1,264,176

 1,264,825

 1,262,231

 1,259,314

 1,258,666

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,322

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,312

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,678

 2,443

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2019 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 26,052 7,433 6,626 -21,403

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-1,928

 321

-3,211

 214

-535

 535

 1,391

 643

 1,070

 5,036

-5,143

-5,029

 1,711

 4,818

 5,145

 3,112

-2,361

-3,539

 1,394

 4,506

 4,322

 5,168

 6,361

 1,727

 3,132

 2,702

 649

-2,594

-2,917

-648

 410

 465

 381

 251

 155

 151

 122

 127

 145

 142

 152

 157

 151

 148

 161

 132

 133

 144

 140

 138

 154

 148

 191

 305

 355

 312

 301

 295

 269

 491

-578

-793

-498

-420

-326

-523

-289

-459

-280

-1,394

-198

-216

-670

-454

-308

-192

-94

-3,795

-2,893

551

-335

-457

-615

-231

-635

-469

-2,246

-246

-1,778

-562

ELEV STORAGE

 1,322

 484,495

 483,702

 483,204

 482,784

 482,458

 481,935

 481,646

 481,187

 480,907

 479,513

 479,315

 479,099

 478,429

 477,975

 477,667

 477,475

 477,381

 473,586

 470,693

 471,244

 470,909

 470,452

 469,837

 469,606

 468,971

 468,502

 466,256

 466,010

 464,232

 463,670

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 485,073

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-1,700

0

-1,500

0

-3,200
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00 648

- CR IN RE John Christopher MCELHATTEN Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 28, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On September 6, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his pro se motion to dismiss appointed counsel. However, in order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a non

- discretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do

so. In re Molina , 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). When a properly filed motion is pending before a trial court, the act of giving consideration to and ruling upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus m ay issue to compel the trial judge to act. See Safety

- Kleen Corp. v. Garcia , 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). However, mandamus will not issue unless the record indicates that a properly filed

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No s . 2010

- CR

- 10992 and 2010

- CR

- 10993 , styled State of Texas v. John Christopher McElhatten , i n the 437 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding.04

- 11

- 00648

- CR

- 2

- motion has awaited disposi tion for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Relator has the burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); see also T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A); Walker v. Packer , 82 7 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Here, relator has not provided this court with a file stamped copy of his motion or any other documents to show that a properly filed motion is pending before the trial court and has been brought to the trial court’s attent ion. Additionally, relator asserts he filed his motion to dismiss appointed counsel on September 1, 2011, just six days before relator’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed in this court. Relator has failed to meet his burden that a properly filed

mo tion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Based on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for l eave to file is DENIED as moot.
PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH