alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, Edward L. Masry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Save the World Air, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Save the
World Air, Inc.

Dated: June 6, 2004                  By:   /s/ Edward L. Masry
      ---------------------                -----------------------------
                                           Edward L. Masry
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Save the World Air, Inc. and will be retained by Save the World Air,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

        I, Eugene Eichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Save the World Air, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Save the
World Air, Inc.

Dated: June 6, 2004                   By:  /s/ Eugene Eichler
      ---------------------                -----------------------------
                                           Eugene Eichler
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Save the World Air, Inc. and will be retained by Save the World Air,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                             516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   622
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2673
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       622
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1373)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1373)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1373)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Less than .01 per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven M. Skow, President and C.E.O., certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Integrity Bancshares, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 

 

 5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
May 13, 2005                                                  /s/  Steven M. Skow   Steven M. Skow, President and C.E.O.   (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 160

 165

 170

 166

 169

 160

 176

 146

 138

 111

 92

 89

 87

 94

 101

 101

 98

 101

 101

 105

 106

 113

 105

 105

 111

 115

 118

 119

 142

 139

 140

 140

 138

 127

 125

 98

 83

 74

 75

 67

 68

 70

 77

 79

 78

 85

 87

 86

 90

 91

 81

 79

 78

 77

 74

 74

 150

 147

 148

 153

 154

 147

 143

 119

 103

 88

 82

 78

 78

 83

 88

 88

 87

 91

 95

 96

 97

 102

 94

 91

 91

 90

 89

 90

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,781

 1,820

 1,857

 1,896

 1,928

 1,955

 1,979

 1,978

 1,960

 1,923

 1,872

 1,810

 1,741

 1,673

 1,611

 1,552

 1,491

 1,429

 1,370

 1,319

 1,273

 1,256

 1,247

 1,250

 1,259

 1,271

 1,282

 1,289

 127

 130

 133

 135

 138

 140

 141

 141

 140

 137

 134

 129

 124

 120

 115

 111

 107

 102

 98

 94

 91

 90

 89

 89

 90

 91

 92

 92

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
----

----

| Delaware                      | 77-0100596                                |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| (State      of Incorporation) | (I.R.S.      Employer Identification No.) |

| Title      of each class          |   | Name      of each exchange on which registered |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
| Common      Stock $2.50 par value |   | New      York Stock Exchange                   |

| Large      accelerated filer x | Accelerated      filer ¨ | Non-accelerated      filer ¨ |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------|

----

----

| By:    |    /s/      Stephen E. Johnson                   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Stephen      E. Johnson, Senior Vice President &  Secretary |

----

| EXHIBIT NO. | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 23.2        | Consent      of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                                                                                                                                                          |
| 31.1        | Section 302      Certification of Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                      |
| 31.2        | Section 302      Certification of Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                      |
| 32          | Section 906      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial      Officer                                                                                                     |
| 99.1        | TAMCO      Financial Statements as of November 30, 2008, and for each of the three      years in the period ended November 30, 2008 and Report of Independent      Registered Public AccountingFirm |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 414.05

 414.07

 414.03

 414.08

 414.25

 414.43

 414.59

 414.85

 415.19

 415.54

 415.85

 416.13

 416.29

 416.46

 416.84

 417.71

 418.78

 420.09

 421.98

 423.13

 423.94

 424.50

 424.95

 425.28

 427.18

 428.30

 429.16

 429.98

 480.6

 480.7

 480.4

 480.8

 482.1

 483.5

 484.8

 486.8

 489.5

 492.2

 494.6

 496.9

 498.1

 499.5

 502.5

 509.4

 518.1

 528.7

 544.4

 554.0

 560.9

 565.6

 569.5

 572.3

 588.8

 598.6

 606.2

 613.5

STORAGE

+1.1

+0.2

-0.3

+0.4

+1.3

+1.4

+1.2

+2.0

+2.7

+2.7

+2.4

+2.2

+1.3

+1.3

+3.0

+7.0

+8.6

+10.7

+15.6

+9.6

+6.9

+4.8

+3.8

+2.8

+16.5

+9.8

+7.6

+7.3

CHANGE

3,233

2,762

2,566

2,904

3,503

3,441

3,368

3,732

4,003

4,066

3,940

3,788

3,397

3,336

4,185

6,147

6,962

7,875

10,242

7,291

5,999

5,091

4,557

4,094

10,926

7,546

6,440

6,166

INFLOW

 2,603

 2,588

 2,634

 2,608

 1,875

 2,623

 2,626

 2,575

 2,573

 2,584

 2,599

 2,558

 2,639

 2,548

 2,587

 2,581

 2,574

 2,402

 2,266

 2,320

 2,447

 2,589

 2,549

 2,608

 2,539

 2,505

 2,517

 1,461

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 863

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 938

OUTLET

 74

 69

 76

 87

 90

 94

 88

 87

 76

 77

 94

 95

 95

 84

 79

 50

 41

 82

 97

 91

 84

 81

 56

 47

 84

 73

 70

 71

PUMPING

 10

 26

 13

 13

 8

 18

 26

 50

 13

 19

 19

 21

 24

 24

 0

 11

 0

 11

 0

 17

 14

 14

 17

 9

 9

 15

 21

 18

C.F.S.

 .04

 .10

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .07

 .10

 .19

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .09

 .09

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .07

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .15

 .94

 .70

 .69

 .32

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .59

 .59

 1.01

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +133.9 141,560 69,578 1 1,801 2,192 440 1.62 5.04

ACRE-FEET +133,900 280,784 138,008 2 3,572 4,348 873

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 138,008

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 2

 4,348

TOTAL 145,930

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 21.81

 479.5

OUTLET 3,572 5.04
(March 8, 1948.)

#### Margaret Koehler, Appellant, v. Sidney M. Berman, Respondent.

Whether the defense sought to be struck out is applicable, will depend on full disclosure of all the facts at trial, including the relationship that may be established between defendant and his corporation. The defense is allowable as a pleading. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.1 Scope of regulations.

The regulations in this part apply to the manufacture of medicines, medicinal preparations, food products, flavors, flavoring extracts, and perfume that are unfit for beverage use and are made with taxpaid distilled spirits. The regulations cover the following topics: obtaining drawback of internal revenue tax on distilled spirits used in the manufacture of nonbeverage products; and bonds, claims, formulas and samples, losses, and records to be kept pertaining to the manufacture of nonbeverage products.

[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37401, July 28, 2009]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Save the
World Air, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Date:
August 23, 2004
    
    /s/ EDWARD L. MASRYEdward L. MasryChief Executive OfficerDate:
August 23, 2004
    
    /s/ EUGENE EICHLEREugene EichlerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/
      Kenneth BosketKenneth
      BosketCEODated:
      November 9,  2010




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for
purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Crown
Equity.





/s/
      Lowell HoldenLowell
      HoldenCFODated:
      November 9,  2010




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Crown Equity  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.


2
§ 33.29 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or representative for— ( 1 ) Failing to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section must reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) If a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may— ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with the order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon testimony relating to, the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with the request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the ALJ may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief, or other document that is not filed in a timely fashion.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(2))
(No. 73-CC-438

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Agriculture, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 20, 1973.*

D. K. Mc Intosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Charles Dusenberry, Jr., and Others, Respondents, *v.*Sagamore Development Company and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with H. Ward Leonard and Others, Defendants.

Second Department,

June 27, 1913.

Pleading—misjoinder of actions — representative action by stockholders and action to dissolve corporation — demurrer.

A representative action by stockholders in which the corporation, although a nominal defendant, is really a plaintiff, and a cause of action to dissolve the corporation, which cause of action does not belong to the corporation itself, cannot be joined as they belong to different plaintiffs, and a demurrer to the complaint should be sustained.

Appeal by the defendants, Sagamore Development Company and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 21st day of May, 1913, overruling demurrers to the complaint.

*Allan R. Campbell,*for the appellants.

*John F. Brennan,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam:

Plaintiffs have attempted to state two causes of action which may not be joined. One is a representative action by stockholders of the Sagamore Development Company, in which the corporation, although a nominal defendant, is really a plaintiff in the sense that it has rights against the other defendants which the plaintiff stockholders are entitled to have it enforce. This cause of action belongs to the corporate body, and not to the plaintiff or other stockholders individually, nor to the body of stockholders collectively. *(Continental Securities Co.*v. *Belmont,*206 N. Y. 7, 15.) The other is a cause of action to destroy the corporate life of the said defendant, which cause of action at least does not belong to the corporation itself. In effect, therefore, two causes of action have been united which belong to different plaintiffs: We do not decide whether either cause of action is stated effectively. It is enough that plaintiffs have attempted thus to state them. *(Todaro*v. *Somerville Realty*
      *486
      *Co.,*138 App. Div. 1; *Higgins*v. *Crichton,*11 Daly, 114; affd, without opinion, 98 N. Y. 626.)

The order overruling defendants’ demurrer should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the demurrers sustained, with leave to plaintiffs within twenty days after entry of the order herein to amend the complaint upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.

Jenks, P. J., Bubr, Thomas, Cabe and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Order overruling defendants’ demurrer reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and demurrers sustained, with leave to plaintiffs within twenty days after entry of the order herein to amend the complaint upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.
#### Anna Price v. Mary F. Alexander and Another.

Motion granted, without costs. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.