19472 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 2011–8237 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 18, 2011. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 18, 2011. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, Employment and Training 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 29th day of 

March 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

APPENDIX

[17 TAA petitions instituted between 2/28/11 and 3/4/11] 

TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of petition 

80011 ................ Allegheny Dimension, LLC (Company) ................................ Petersburg, WV ..................... 02/28/11 02/28/11 

80012 ................ Siemens (Workers) ............................................................... Malvern, PA .......................... 02/28/11 02/23/11 

80013 ................ Robb and Stucky Limited, LLP (Company) .......................... Fort Myers, FL ...................... 02/28/11 02/25/11 

80014 ................ Geneon Entertainment (USA), Inc. (Company) ................... Santa Monica, CA ................. 03/01/11 03/01/11 

80015 ................ ACS (State/One-Stop) .......................................................... Liberty, KY ............................ 03/01/11 02/22/11 

80016 ................ Quad Graphics (Company) .................................................. Mt. Morris, IL ......................... 03/01/11 02/09/11 

80017 ................ Project Resources Group, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................. La Junta, CO ......................... 03/02/11 02/25/11 

80018 ................ Cranston Print Works Company (Company) ........................ Cranston, RI .......................... 03/02/11 03/01/11 

80019 ................ Sea Gull Lighting Products LLC (Workers) .......................... Riverside, NJ ......................... 03/02/11 03/01/11 

80020 ................ Hankook Tire Co., LTD (Company) ..................................... Uniontown, OH ...................... 03/02/11 03/01/11 

80021 ................ Pitney Bowes (State/One-Stop) ........................................... Purchase, NY ........................ 03/02/11 03/01/11 

80022 ................ Sulberg USA (Union) ............................................................ Havana, IL ............................. 03/03/11 03/02/11 

80023 ................ Fenton Art Glass Company (Union) ..................................... Willamstown, WV .................. 03/03/11 03/01/11 

80024 ................ Midi Music Center, Inc. (Company) ...................................... LaGrange Park, IL ................ 03/03/11 02/16/11 

80025 ................ Samuels Jewelers (Worker) ................................................. Austin, TX ............................. 03/03/11 03/02/11 

80026 ................ Computer Task Group, Inc. (Workers) ................................. Buffalo, NY ............................ 03/04/11 03/02/11 

80027 ................ William Kelly & Sons California, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ....... El Cajon, CA ......................... 03/04/11 03/03/11 

[FR Doc. 2011–8238 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,579] 

Consolidated Glass and Mirror 

Corporation, a Subsidiary of Guardian 

Industries Corporation, Galax, VA; 

Notice of Negative Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On September 21, 2010, the 

Department of Labor issued an 

Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration for the 

workers and former workers of 

Consolidated Glass and Mirror 

Corporation, a Subsidiary of Guardian 

Industries Corporation, Galax, Virginia 

(subject firm). The Notice was published 

in the Federal Register on September 

29, 2010 (75 FR 60139). Workers are 

engaged in employment related to the 

production of mirrored and/or 

laminated glass articles used in 

furniture, automotives and architecture. 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

findings that the subject firm did not, 

during the period under investigation, 

shift to/acquire from a foreign country 

the production of articles like or directly 

competitive with the mirrored and/or 

laminated glass products manufactured 

by the workers; that increased imports 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with the mirrored and/or laminated 

glass products manufactured by the 

workers did not contribute importantly 

to the workers’ separation, or threat of 

separation; and that the workers did not 

produce a component part that was 

directly used in the production of an 

article or the supply of service by a firm 

that employed a worker group that is 

eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) based on the 

aforementioned article. 

The request for reconsideration, filed 

by former workers of the subject firm, 

stated that the Galax, Virginia facility is 

owned by ‘‘Guardian Industries, a 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES