Compliance Stack Emission 

Test Report 

Determination of Total Filterable Particulate 

Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, 

Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total 

Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric 

Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible 

Emissions 

Ceric Kiln 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Summervillc, Pennsylvania 

Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 

Job Number: 080609 

Prepared by: 

uompliance 

~ Testing, Inc. 

PO Box 41156 

Cleveland OH 44141-0156 

Phone:(800) EPA-AIR1(372-2471) 

Report Date: July 31, 2008 
SuperiorQuality Air Gompliance 

Emission Testing. 

Valid Results 

Guaranteed. Testing, Inc. 

P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 

9-800-EPA-AIR1 www.aircomp.com 

testing@aircomp.com 

July 31, 2008 

Mike Krzyzanowski 

Environmental Manager 

Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 

423 South Pottsville Pike 

Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 

Dear Mike: 

The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on 

June 24 and 25, 2008. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA 

Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect 

at the time of this test. 

Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data 

colleeted during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover 

letier (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally, 

you may address, preferably in a timetable fonnat, any obligations or implications that might 

be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test. 

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results. 

On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the 

opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work 

with you again on any additional future testing projects. 

Sincerely, 

// _o~~ 

Phaneendra Uppalapati 

Air Quality Engineer 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Table of Contents 

Page 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 

1.1 Summary of Test Program 2 

1.2 Key Personnel 2 

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3 

2.3 Presentation of Results 4 

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 15 

3.1 Process Description and Operation 15 

3.2 Control Equipment Description 15 

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 15 

3.4 Process Sarnpling Location 16 

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 20 

4.1 Test Methods 20 

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 22 

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 27 

5.1 QA Audits 27 

5.2 QA/QC Problems 28 

6.0 APPENDIX 40 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc, - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

I ' f 9 ' • f 

1.1 Summary of Test Program 

Glen-gery Corporation - Hanley Plant, located in Summerville, Pennsylvania eontracted Air Compliance 

Testing, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio to conduct compliance stack emissions testing for their Ceric Kiln (Source 

ID; 113). Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery 

Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008.. The 

testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008. 

Sampling was performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust 

Stack to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable parCiculate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO z), 

sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCI), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Sampling was also 

performed at the Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) (as NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMOs). 

Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the product S32. During this 

test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. 

Visible Emissions (VEs) measured as percent opacity were also monitored at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack to deterinine the maximum six-minute average of opacity. 

The test methods that were eonducted during this test were EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 

26A. 

1.2 Key Personnel 

The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were: 

Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076 

John Guth, Air Quality Program Manager, PA DEP - Northwest District Office, 814-332-6940 

Philip J. Billick, President, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 

Sin Hoi Chiew, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 

2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 

The purpose of this test was to detennine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, S0 2, H2SO4, HCI, and 

HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine the 

mass emission rate of NO, (as NO2), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maxirnum production levels for the product S32. VEs (measured as %-opacity) were also 

determined at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery 

Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. 

The specific test objectives for this test were to• 

Measure the concentration of total filterable PM, SO Z, H2SO4, HCI, and I-IF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Staek and also measure the concentration of NO x, CO, and 

TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. 

Measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet 

Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the 

product S32. 

Utilize the above variables to deterinine the mass ernission rate of total filterable PM, S0 2, H2SO4, HCI, and 

HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine 

the mass emission rate of NOx(as NO2), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

Determine the maximum six-minute average of opacity at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 presents the sampling and ana1ytical matrix log for this test. 

2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 

The intermediate sainpling train leak check performed during Run I at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

yielded a leakage rate which was greater than the allowable leakage rate of 0.020 cfm. Therefore, Run 1 was 

voided and three additional runs (Runs 2-4) were performed at both the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and the 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Results from Run 1 are not included in this test report. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

2.3 Presentation of Results 

Two (2) sampling trains were utilized during each run to detennine the ma'ss emission rate of total filterable 

PM, SOZ, H2SO4, HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct while operating at maximum production 

levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular 

weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCI, and IIF and a second eampling train 

measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of 

SOZand H2SO4 . 

Three (3) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable 

PM, SOZ, H2SO4, HCI, HF, NO, (as NO2), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while 

operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas 

volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCI, 

and HF and a second sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, 

moisture content, and concentration of SO Zand H2SO4 . A third sampling train was utilized to measure the 

stack gas concentration of NO x , CO, and TGNMOs. 

Table 2.2.1 displays the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, HCI, and HF measured at the Ceric Kiln 

Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and the mass emission rate of NO x(as 

NOZ), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production 

levels for the product S32. 

Table 2.2.1 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack while operating at maximurn production levels for the product S32. 

Table 2.2.2 displays the mass emission rate of S0 2and H2SO4at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at 

the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. 

The mass emission rate displayed in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack utilize 

the saturated moisture content values determined for the given stack gas temperatures and pressures as per 

Section 4.0, of EPA Method 4. The measured flue gas percent by volume moisture contents were higKer 

than the calculated saturated values which is indicative of the presence of entrained moisture droplets in the 

stack gas. 

The concentration of TGNMOs measured during Runs 1 and 3 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

were reported to be below the accepted EPA Method 25 Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of 50 ppmvd. 

The accepted MDL is approximately 10-times the analytical laboratory Level of Quantification (LOQ) of 5 

ppmvd. 

Concentration values in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 denoted with a' ~' were measured to be below the minimum 

detection limit (MDL) of the applicable analytical method. Mass emission rates denoted with a'<' in Tables 

2.2.1 and 2.2.2 were calculated utilizing the applicable MDL concentration value instead of the "as 

measured" concentration value. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

The graphs that follow Table 2.2.2 present the raw, uncorrected concentration data measured in the field by 

the EPA Method 7E and 10 sampling systems at the Cerie Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Staek. 

Tables 2.3.1 - 2.33 display the measured results for the VE readings performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber 

Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The minimum, 

maximum, and maximum six-minute average opacity readings are displayed for each run. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
W 

v ❑ 

O~ 

yMi 

~m'1 ~ 

vml M 

U M O' o V1 O~ CO O~ 

N y V N d <Y 

~ A 

M N M H E = o ri 'n 

y A E e rn v rn 

E p o ri vi 

y A 

~ a rn a rn 

0 0 

rv 

0 

M 

H N _ 

i~ 

~ 

Ma 

h 

/w _ M rn'n rn rn m m m rn m rn 

O. iV 

,~ V ❑ O~ m M Q~ M M 

N C C N d V 

y E ❑ rn M M a. c'm rm E ❑ N 'n rn N ~ ., rn 

~ A a rPi 

N 

S 

N 

S N 

~ V '❑ V ❑ y 

❑ C A C Q F A ~ ~ q Cq 

N N 

r/❑i '~ 

U V 

'~ 

N 

V V V V U V 

❑ 

u 

0 0 O 

oa 0 O m 0 O oo 0 w 0 N N N 

A N N N N N N 

t qC 

N 

ti 

U 

N 

E 

U 

~ 

Q 

sa 

~ 

.~ .. 

C 

C 

OD .~ C 

E 

~ 

rl 

N 

m 

a 

~ 

d 

a 

E 

~ 

E 

~ 

E 

M. 

O 

N °c 

c 

N 

~ 

d 

O 

N F 
~ 0 

~ 0 

~ 0 

a 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ m 

E 

U 

L 

Q 

L ~ 

~ 

H 

H .~ 

n 

d 

~ 

~ 

bA 

q .~ 

~ 

~ 

N 

.-i 

N 

~ 

~ 

~ 

M N 

a 

! 

E 

F 

s 

m 

Q 

~ d 

W O 

~ O 

N 

E Ld 

N 

~ 

a ~ 

~ N N 

C 

~ 

~ 

N 

N 

~ 

N N 

~ 

o ~ _ 

M N M M N M 

w 

~d, ', O 

~ C 

~ ~ A 

3 H •~ ~; LO d ~ d; V o ~

C M N M M N M 

~ rA A 

w ~ 

v 

Cj A 

d ~ ~ 

0 

V .L1 U 

U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y~"/ Vl ~~C/. V) 

~ ~ Fr4 ~ IY .S'y 

V V V 

V V V 

C 

N O O O O O O 

A N N N N N N 
a 

_ e 

V 

~ 

~ m ~ 

E 

U 

¢ 

$ 

~ 

~ 

Y IX 

~ 3 

~ z 

5 ~ 

€ ~5 V 

8 ~ ~ a a 

~ ~ S 

4 ~ ~ 

!J7 

~ 

a 

0 

V N °o 

~ 

a hi 

N 

n 

F 

N~ O V h 

~ V -° p~ 

OO O~ P O N -_ ~ N O(V 

~• N b 

N °' 

V V V A 

y 

y A V v V A V v V 

°a_ y 

C P O O vi n

~` c M_ O 

~~D O O P " A v v y/~ v V - 

d V 

iC~ •' M O n 

N ~~o ~ N N_ ~~` p ~ N.• 1~ 

o P O 

I~ V V y A V V V 

0 

y y N 

° 

OO V~ • O o O `D N (L O V V 

V 

a O V 

V 

•`~3 ~ p Z r~i~ 3 ~ g 

OE ~SSp U"d ~ ~ ~/ '~ > 

~ II f5 a` 

¢ 

A 

E w 

G 

$ 

S 

E 

U 

F 

ri 

~ 
~ 

~ M 

h 

~ 

R ~ V1 

N 

00 

N 

O 

 N ll 

W 

M 

m ~ 

L M 

A 

a 

00 00 M 00 00 O 

l~ M h d' Vl 

~ 

M O O 

^; M • L ~ 

M 

N 

'J. 

Q 

W .dQ 

h X 

d 

h M 

a 

L 

~ 

W 

W V 

.~ 

v 

U ~ 

~ N 

0 

~ 

s 

° 

0 

a 

~ 

E 

?~ 

~ a[i 

~ 

~ 

°' 

.~ 

°' 

a~i 

Cj 

O 

o• 

:: 

~ 

~ 

~' 

aGi 

~ 

v 

~ .9n 

:: 

.~ Wv, `~ 

~ 

.3 

v 

V 

O 

~ 

e~ 

w 

6 

~ 

•'G `

a~ 

k+ 

Q `~ 

.`L 

A ~ u^°, 

0 

6 

.~` 

°o `~ (7 

.~. I

5 o°~• 

° 

ro 

Q 

r'Ti ``a' 

~ 

(= 

4 2 

•''~ 

x 

o 

? 

~' 

~ 

~ 

a~i 

~ 

o 

Q 

`So 

•C 

v~i 

q 

r~n 

C 

~ 

ri~ 

C 

~ N C 

? ~ U 

.O T a a 

Cv 

U 

a 

m 

0 

~ 

O 

C 

~ 

C .~ 

~ 

U 

m 

Q 

O 

U 

\ 

Q 

~ 

W 

O .r . 0 WG 

~ 

O 

~ 

~ P@, 

W 

N 

N 

N 

v 

~ ~ 

F 

m 

m 

a 

0 

N 

N 

C 

~ @ 

d V b N 

w @ 

~ 

N ~ 

O N 

N ~ 

v~ N 

x ~ 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO xConcentration 

40 

36 --- --- ------------- _ _---------------------------------__ __ 

--..__.....- 

---------------------------- _ --------- ------ 

32 -------- --...._-.... 

---- ------------------ ----- 

----_..-......._.._..-..------------- --- ---------------- ------------------ -- 

28 

° 24 

..__---- ------------- --- ---------------------- .......-------------- ____ --- ------------ --- ---------- ----- ----- --------- 

-----_-- 

 -- ------- ----- -------------------------- _ ------- ----- --------------------------- - ----- -- --------------- - ---- 

E20 

Q- a 16 

........... 

.....--------------- -- ---------.-....---- --------------------- - ------ ------ - --- .......-------------------------- 

--- _------- ----- --- -------------------------------- -------- -- - ------------------------------ --------- __..... ------ --- ._... 

12 ........ 

-- -- - --- - ---- ---. ---------"'. ----- — 

8 --- --- - - ---------------------- -- - - 

. 

.............--- 

--- ------- -- -- 

------- ------ ------- ---- q --------........_..._,..___. 

0 

O,y'1 0,~~ O,~'1 O„~0 Op,`L Op,O Ok0 Oy~ O~G Oy'1 ~~O ^,y'~ ^~ yR ~,ti1 ^30 n,y`L ^g`o ^30 ^p,^ ^pk ^p'1 

'~~ ' y~ 

* ~~ ,

~^ , yn' ~^' yn' ~^ ' ~^' ~^' ~^ - ~n' y^ y^' yn' yn ~n ~^ y^ y^ ~^ 

6\L 6\`L 6\L 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO X Concentration 

40 

36 ...- -------------- ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -- ---- ------------- - 

32 -- --------- -- -- - --------- -- --- ------------- ---------.....------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

28 

V 24 

--------- -------- ------------------------------------------------ .-.... ---------------------------------- -------------- ------------ ----- 

....----- ----------------------------------..-------------------------------- --- ------------------------.-...----- - 

E 20 

a 

a 16 

-- ------------------ ---------- ---------....--------------------------------- -_-.-...--------._..-..-------.....-- --------- ...-..---- 

-- ............._--------- 

- ---..-..-.. _..--- -------------------------------------------- - ----- -- 

12 - -- - ------ - - - - - --- --- __ -------... _-...---T........_

8 - - ------------------ ------------------------_ 

__.-...- ....---------......--------- _ ---..__ _- - 

4 -- -....-----------..,-----------'------ ~ ---._------------------- ------------------------------'--_.-..-. 

0 

(~ V M1^ ^'~ "'\ a~ A.3 ~~ ~~J ( V (7'J A ~ ^N A ~ ^\ 1~~(~~ A~/~nJ 1. ~(~V A ~(~~J "JV ",`✓ !~v ~^ 

^3'V Nn~ 'J Nn

b' ^r~' ^r~' ~(~' ~(~ ' ^N'Y(~ ^N'V^N'V/~ ^N'V!~~~`' ~~`' '~~`' ~ ~

t

!~^(~• `' '`_ ^r~'N! J ~ ^(~ ' !~ ~N ~ !~N' 

\`~<'' \`~~ \`~~ \`~~ \`~~ \`~•J \`~`J \!~~ \`~'J \`~'J \`~'J \`~'J \`~~ \!~'J \`~~ \`~'J \~'J \`~<'J \`~`J \1 '•J 

~ '0 0 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 6 C~ 6 0 0 6 6 0 

Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO XConcentration 

40 

36 -- _ ---------- --- ------- -----------------..-......-...----...----------------------------------------------------------------- 

32 -------- -- --- 

--.._._._..-- --------------------- --- -- ---- - 

................_...... _-. 

28 

y 24 

_ ... 

--- --- .... ------------------------- ._... 

- 

-..._------ ----------- -- ---------------------- --- ...--- - --- 

._.. 

------- 

-.._.__... --- ------------- -- -------------"--- -- -- --'------ - ...........-.-....-.. 

-- 

._..... .--......... 

E 20 

Q 16 G 

_.._-- ------- ------------------- ...._.....- --- ...-------------------- ------------- -- --------- ---------- ----- ----------- -- 

.-,._. ....--.._.....- 

---.,. - ---- - ----------------- - ------ -------- _ ---------------- 

12 ----------- ------ 

-........... __------- ----- - - 

.-...- _.... 

- 

8 - --------.......---- --------- -------.....-------------- ---------------------------------------- -- __....----------------- 

q

--- 

-----------,_.,------- ~~ --__- ._........--------------- -- ------- ~

--...._,.,._._-

~ ----.._- _...._._.- ~ ------- ~~ - 

0 

0P b

'1 00 O"~ ,~N (Lg `3`Y `yh "~~b p,~ p, p~ , ~j~ h 5`'° ^y. ^5. ^~ . ^y' ^6' ^6. ^`°' ^6. ^6. ^~' ^`°. ^`°. ^~ . ^`°. ^`°. ^~ . ^6 . 

0 0 0 0 0 \ti~' 0 \ti~' 6 \Iy 6 \1~' 0 \ti~ 0 \~~ 0 \ti~ 6 \ti~ 0 \tiy 0 \ti~ 0 \ti~ 6 \ti~ 0 \tiy 6 \ti~ 6 \1~ 6 \tiy 

Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 10 Air Compliance Tesfing, lnc. - 080609 
CL 

CL 

Test Date: June 25, 2008 page11 AirConpliancoTestin8k/u 'O0000 
Comoliance Stack Emisslon Test Reoort GIen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

_ 

StartTime

End Time 

12:23 

13:23 

Max 6 min ayerage 

Minimum Reatlinq 

Maximum Reading 

_ 6.46 

0 

10.00 

Sec.1 0 1 15 30 1 45 Six roinute aveta es: 

Min. 

0 5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

10 

10 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

10 10 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

10 5 

5 5 

5 10 

5 5 

5 5 

5 10 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.21 

5.21 

5.21 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

5.42 

5.42 

5.63 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

5.63 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

6.25 

6.04 

5.63 

5.42 

5.63 

5.63 

511 

5,00 

5.00 

5D0 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4,79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.21 

5.21 

5.21 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.5B 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.79 

5.42 

5.63 

5.63 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

6.46 

5.83 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.21 

511 

5.21 

5.21 

5.00 

5.00 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

5.00 

5.42 

5.63 

5.63 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

6.04 

5.83 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

6.25 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.21 

5.21 

5.21 

5.21 

5.00 

5.00 

4.5B 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

5.21 

5.42 

5.63 

5.63 

5.83 

5.83 

5.83 

6.04 

5.83 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

6.04 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.63 

5.42 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

Table 2.3.1 - Visible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 entl 25, 2008 Pe9e 12 Alr Compliance 7esting, Inc. - 080609 
Compl'ance Stack Emission Test Repon Glen-Gerv CorporatVon - Hanlev Plant 

StartTime 

End Time 

15:45 

16:45 

Max 6 min avereg e 

Minimum Reading 

Maximum Reatling 

_ 4.58 

0 

5.00 

Sec. 1 0 15 30 1 45 Sic minute avera es: 

Min. 

0 5 

0 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

0 

0 

5 

5 

0 

0 

5 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

 5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

0 0 

0 5 

0 5 

0 0 

0 5 

0 0 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

0 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

3.13 

2.71 

2.92 

2.50 

2.50 

2.50 

2.71 

3.13 

3.13 

3.33 

3,54 

175 

3.54 

3.33 

3.33 

3.75 

3.75 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.t7 

4.38 

4.17 

3.98 

4.17 

3.75 

3.75 

3.54 

3.75 

3.96 

3.96 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

438 

4.38 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.38 

4.17 

4.38 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4,17 

4.17 

4.17 

4,17 

4.17 

3.13 

2.92 

2.71 

2.29 

2.50 

2.50 

2.71 

2.92 

113 

3.54 

3.75 

3.54 

3.54 

3.33 

3.54 

3.75 

3.75 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

3.96 

3.96 

3.96 

3.96 

3.54 

3.54 

3.75 

3.96 

4,17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

4.5B 

4.38 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

3.96 

4.38 

3.13 

2.92 

2.92 

2.29 

2.29 

2.50 

2.71 

2.92 

3.13 

3.54 

3.75 

3.75 

3.54 

3.33 

3.54 

3.54 

3.96 

3.96 

4.17 

4.38 

417 

4.38 

4.17 

4.17 

3.96 

3.96 

3.75 

3.54 

3.75 

3.75 

3.96 

4.17 

4.38 

438 

4.38 

4.58 

4.17 

4.17 

4.3B 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.17 

3.96 

4.t7 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

2.92 

2.71 

2.71 

2.29 

2.50 

2.71 

2.92 

3.13 

3,33 

3.54 

3.75 

3.54 

3.54 

3.33 

3.54 

3.75 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.17 

4.38 

4,17 

3.96 

3.96 

3.96 

3.75 

3.54 

3.75 

3.96 

3.96 

3.96 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.17 

4,38 

438 

4,38 

4.38 

4.17 

4.58 

4.3B 

4.17 

4.38 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

Table 2.3.2 - Visible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 antl 25, 2008 Page 13 Alr Compliance Testing, Irtc. - 080609 
Compi'ance Slack Emission Test Repon GI®n-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Piant 

StertTime 

End Time 

18:10 

19:10 

Mm( 6 min aVemqe 

Minimum Reading 

Maximum Readln 

5.00 

0 

a00 

Sec.1 0 1 15 1 30 1 45 Slx minute avera es: 

Min. 

0 5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 

5 

5 

5 

5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

0 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 0 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

5 5 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4,58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

5.00 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

3.96 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

458 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

196 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.56 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.56 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.58 

4.56 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

417 

4.17 

4.17 

4.17 

4.38 

4.38 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.38 

438 

4.58 

4.58 

4.56 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

5.00 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

4.79 

5.00 

4.79 

4.79 

4.58 

4.58 

4.58 

4.38 

4.58 

4.58 

4.79 

4.79 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

Table 2.3.3 - Visible Emissions 

Test Date: June 24 antl 25, 2008 Page 14 A(r Compllance Tesfing, lnc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Haniey Piant 

3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DE3CRIPTIONS 

3.1 Process Description and Operation 

Glen-Gery Corporation manufactures a wide range of brick products. The Hanley, Pennsylvania facility 

operats the Ceric Kiln which has a permitted capacity of 16.00 ton/hr. Ceric Kiln was in operation during the 

performance of this test event. 

Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic. 

3.2 Contro/ Equipment Description 

During this test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. 

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 

3 3 1 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duet 

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 41.7-inches and 

41.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the horizontial plane and was accessed from a permanent platform 

arrangement. Two (2) 3.0-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that 

met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verify 

the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 4.34° was measured. Therefore, the sampling 

location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was 

traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, 

S02, H2SO4, HCl and HF concentration determination. 

33.2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 33.0-inches 

and 33.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a manlift. Two (2) 3.0- 

inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, 

Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic 

flow. An average yaw angle of 4.67° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 

l, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow 

rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, SO z, H2SO4, HCl and HF concentration 

deterinination. The stack was also traversed for stack gas NO xand CO concentration determination. A 

single point loeated in an area of average velocity was utilized to determine the concentration of TGMNOs. 

Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 15 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

3.4 Process Sampling Locafion 

The EPA Reference Test Methods per£ormed did not specifically require that proeess sainples were to be 

taken during the performance o£ this testing event. It is in the best know1edge of Air Compliance Testing that 

no process samples were obtained and therefore no process sampling location was identified in this report. 

See Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel for any process sampling locations which may have been 

utilized unknowingly to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. during this testing event. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 16 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
aiaydsowyy 7 

LL 

~ ~ o 

o 

y vj m o 

a 

W fV ~ E 

~ m y 

u 

~ 

Y 

~ 

~ 

h 

~ 

U O i. 

~ 

G ..i 

~ 

U 

.~ 

d 

U 

~ 

ti 

ri 

0 

eu 

w 

M, 

d 

a 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

6) 

C 

C1j 

C 

i: 

y 

ti 

v 

u 

c . m Q 

E 0 

U 

~ 

~o 

~ 

0 

0 

N 

Ld 

N 

~ 

C 

N 

V 

N 

N 

C 

~ 

~ 

N 

N 

~ 

y 

N 

H 
~ U N 

W (~ 

~ U x ~ ~ a 

.= w 

v. 

I 

E 

m 

d ~ m R c m 

> 3 ° 

M d E p N 

~ 

O 

'- IL 

~ 

U? p 

y ~N 

o c 

e~ 

o •,c, 

U ? ~ O C va 

O ~ 

t 

a m 

~ 

~ 

0 

O 

e 

C O 

a 

N C o 

00' O) C 

cli d ~ m 

E J 

Lm 

~ 

.p 

CK 

i. 

A 

a O 

'w+ 

4~ 

V 

a 

F.7 . O 

Qi 

~ 

~ 

d 

7 

fe 

H 

w 

V 

.^7 

A 

ti 

H 

Fn 

V 

~ 

~.Q 

~ 

F.i 

V 

~ 

~ 

~ 

rV' 

V 

1 

N 

M 

V 

i. 

~ 

bA .ti 

w 

0) 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

C 

dl 

G 

w 

d 

~ 

u c m 

ii. 

S 0 

U ~. Q 

W 

a 

P 

~ 0 0 

N 

Ld 

N 

~ 

C 

N 

a 

N 

N 

C 

~ 

-~ 

N m ~ 

N 

N H 

W U~ 

C ~ ~ N « m R p,-2 

N ~ h ~ E ~ O !9tL 

0 

~ 

~ N N M M 

M ~ V V h O 

N M V 

N M V N c0 

'O 

a 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Repo t Gten-Gery Corporation - Haniey Plant 

n 

300" 

8.88 Equivalent Diameters 

Upstream from Disturbance Port 1 

(2) 3.0" I.D. 

~- Sampiing Porfs 

Located 90°Apart 

r

-33.8" LD.- - - - - - - - - I 

d 

72„ 

2.13 Equivalent Diameters 

Downstream from 

Disturbance 

V33.8" x 33.0" LD. 

Elliptical Stack 

Port 2 

Distance From Distance From 

Inside Wall (in.) inside Wail (in.) 

Point % of Duct Depth Port 1 Port 2 

1 2.1 1.0 1A 

2 6.7 2.3 2.2 

3 11.8 4.0 3.9 

4 17.7 6.0 5.8 

5 25.0 8.5 8.3 

6 35.6 12.0 11.7 

7 64.4 21.8 21.3 

8 75.0 25.4 24.8 

9 82.3 27.8 27.2 

10 88.2 29.8 291 

11 93.3 31.5 30.8 

12 97.9 32.8 32.0 

Figure 3.3 - Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 19 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

4.1 Test Methods 

4.1.1 EPA Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source 

Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate 

from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing ' tn a known direction is 

selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then 

located within each of these equa) areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures 

outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) 

Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of 

the average velocity head with a Type S(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method was utilized in 

its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight 

Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one ofthe following methods: (1) single-point, grab 

sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas satnple is 

analyzed for percent CO Z , percent 02, and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight 

determination a Fyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per 

the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 

Principle: A gas satnple is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample 

streatn and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per 

the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Front-Half PM only) 

Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically fi•om the source and collected on a glass fiber 

filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 t 14°C (248 f 25°F) or such other temperature as 

specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at 

or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This 

method was utilized in its entirety as per the proeedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.6 EPA Method 7E: Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental 

Analyzer Procedure) (Concentrations assumed less than 2,000ppm) 

Principle: A sample is continuously extracted from the effluent stream; a portion of the sample stream is 

conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination of NO, ;concentration. 

Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure reliable data. This method was utilized 

in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 20 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Gien-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

4.1.7 EPA Method 8: Detennination of Sulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary 

Sources 

Principle: A gas sample is extracted isokinetically from the stack. The sulfuric acid mist (including sulfur 

trioxide) and the sulfur dioxide are separated, and both fractions are measured separately by the barium-thorin 

titration method. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, 

Appendix A. 

4.1.8 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources 

Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is detennined visually by a qualified observer. 

This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.9 EPA Method 10: Determination of Carbon Mono xide Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Coneentrations assumed less than 10,000 ppm) 

Principle; An integrated or continuous gas sample is e xtracted from a sampling point and analyzed for carbon 

monoxide (CO) content using a Luft-type nondispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) or equivalent. This method 

was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.10 EPA Method 25: Determination of Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon 

(assamed concentration of organies will be less than 1,000,000 pprn as earbon, and that there will be no 

chlorinated organic compounds in the stack gas) 

Principle: An emission sainple is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate through a heated filter and a 

chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are 

determined by independently analyzing the condensate trap and sainple tank fractions and combining the 

analytical results. The organic content of the eondensate trap fraction is detennined by oxidizing the NMO to 

COZand quantitatively collecting it in the effluent in an evacuated vessel; then a portion of the CO 2is reduced 

to CH4and measured by an FID. The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a 

portion of the sainple into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from carbon monoxide (CO), 

COZ, and CH4 ; the NMO are oxidized to CO2, reduced to CH4, and measured by an FID. In this manner, the 

variable response of the FID associated with different types of organics is eliminated. This method was 

utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

4.1.11 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary 

Sources-Isokinetic Method 

Principle: This metliod is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride 

(HCI), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X Z) [chlorine (Clz ) and bromine 

(BrZ )] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore 

particularly suited for sampling at sources, such ae those controlled by wet serubbers, emitting acid particulate 

matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the 

procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 

The sampling trains utilized during thie testing project are depicted in Figures 4.1 - 4.4. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 21 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant 

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 

Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel utilizing their typical record 

keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the 

conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 and in the Appendix. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 22 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
w J 

p Uj 

Z U U> 

° h 

r2 

w \ 

O 

Q~ 

Z F O 

K (wJ co Z ~ a ° 

M w 

w 

2~ _I 

a 

o 

~ 

w 

o W w ~ J J 

~ W ° 

w 

2 ~ w 

Q J 

> 

0 0 

♦ . 

_ 

~ ` 

Elm 

► 

.. 

.` 0 

, a 

O 

a 

o N a w tw-Ow m Za 

Y 

U ~ FQ Q> Ft 

J N~> 

~ 

O 

2 

d' \~,~ 

w 

W ~ (n 

Z 

F W a.m 

a~ 

cn r= 

wwa r 

gw m 

~ ~ 

~ 0 

a 

a 

LU 

¢ 

rn 0 0 0 W 0 

~ 

~ = 

w O 

a 

F 2 

~ 

C 

LLJ 

L'i 

J ~p 2 d a y 

0=~ W h~ F~ 

UQ Z O 

>° 

~ ¢ `~ ¢ 

~o 

~ 1~ ~ 

w U ` 

N o j ~ 

U Q m Q Q ~ y 

~ m ~ y 

~ 

~ 

U ~ m oo / 

W ~ ?~ L 

0 

~ Eo~ O 

~ C 

~ E 

~ 

-o 

W~ ~ 

EZOO ~~ 

4-

0 ~~ s ~ ~ 

~ v 

w d 

7p 

~ 

~ N

Q 

N 

ro 

~ ~ 

@ 

4- oZO"

~ a m y O 

a ~ 

° inn o 

~ 

~ 

~ 

w p~ Q w W ° F- w , 

~ 

~ 

w z L 

0 0 ~ ~ a z Q W 

~ 

W O O N 

N 

~ 

ro 

N 

C 

~ ~ 

~ 

m 0 

N N H 
j r 

O UJ 

Z 

z 

< LU m

>-ui 

LU 

IL Of ui 

ui af UJ ui 

ui (1) 2 

co z LU 

>- ci 

< z of 

2 0 ui 

Z Z UJ 0 

0:) 

Z 0 

LU 0 

UJ 

~ UJ -i C) ui 

LL w 

(D < 

z 

a. ui 

1-- 

LU 

2 

0 

LU 

M: 

cl -"~ 

LLJ < 

w 

w w <

a: 

Lli 

co 

0 

LU 

0 

(D z 

~A 

EL 

15;(f) 

LU 

FI 

NO, 

Lu 

> 

m 

Ss 

0 

 1: 

A-006 

E 

0 0 U) 

m 

-T E LU 

a. 

0 

E9 Lij 

w 

LL 

0 

w 

w 

I-- 

LU 

:E 

0 

z 

0 

O 

~ - W 

w E > W 

W CL 

W.A 

ui 

LLJ 

IL 

ui 

1— 

UJ 

< 

> 

z > ui L 

< M (L 

> 

cl 

16. 

Lu 

LLJ 

< 

ui 
w 

J 4.' w 

w > x N ~ O J W 0 Z¢ ~ J 

S QZ a NK r 

¢o zo a O Q U 

J }j 

~ O 

J 

LL 

~ 

~ 

a ~ o 

mz w~ W J _ 

° y az 

¢ ~ w 

~ ~ J 

§ 

ui J 

0 

~ ~ Z_ ~ ~ OJ¢ -~ ~O wJ ~ 

_~ 

U 

}Z Z a o m 0 U~ M H ~ w o J 

a 

~ ~ ,.,,.,"""..-,-► 

» w ~O~ ~ wm 

N N 

d 

~ a 

z 

O 

~ 

mw 

¢~ Uj 0 

W 

w 

o z 

~ J a xQ \ ~ 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

a 

~ 

~ 

C 

~ 

u 

~ 

E 

U 

L 

Q 

c C 

, C `c 

I U 

: 

Q 

U 

z 

O 

Q 

~ 

m ~! 

Q U 

W 

Wm 

V `o 

¢m O c U W w 

~ O ~ (nI-~ 1a- ~J x C - ? uJ-,o ~ x 

( 

W O 

O 

N 

N 

N 

N 

N C 

~ 

N 

@ 

Q 

N 

N 

F 

~ 

J 

Q 

~ 
a z>; 

Q~> 

U 

O~~ 

wZ > 

O U 

w J 

a 

~ 

O 

U 

O 

~ 

K 

w 

H 

W 

> J 

> 

w 

~ 

~ 

~ a 

W 

~ W ~

J 

w~ o a z 

7-O 

wU 

U 

W J d Z) 

O U 

O 

~ 

~ 

W F=- 

a~ 

w 

W 

:E 

O 

a 

~ 

w 

CD w 

zr ~ 2 J F 

o~ 

J a 

2 

~ 

~ n. ~ _ Qw > 

(D 

z 

Fj 

gJ 

t7 

w Of 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

C w % 

I 

~ 

~ 

m 

¢ E 

U 

~ 4 

ui aJ. z ¢< ~ 

W Z d E- w `t w Z ~ 

~ 

H 

~ 

~ 

~ 8 ~ 

~ 

~ 

pO 

w F 

o a' 

~ N 

"O 0 

~ 

v 

~ 

w ~ W 

x ¢ w W 

Jm 

~ O OS v 

0 (~ tt_ 0 

a~ 

Q W 

~ w 

x 

w 

J W 

H 0) W U) m U) O 

J ~ 

z~ 

F 

cn J 

/ Q 

Y 

U 

N 

N 

d) ro 

a 

~ 

O N 

~ N 'C 

N 

N 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ m 

~ 

N N 

~ 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 

5.1 QA Audits 

Tables 5.1.1 -5.9 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. 

All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their 

respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1 - 5.2.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below 

the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. 

Tables 5.3 and 5.4 illustrate the nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide calibration audits whieh were 

performed during this test (and integral to performing EPA Method 7E, and 10 correctly) were all within the 

Measurement System Performance Specifications of t3% of span for the Zero and Calibration Drift Checks, 

t5% of span for the System Calibration Bias Checks, and t2% of span for the Calibration Error Checks. 

Table 5.5 displays the NO2 to NO converter efficiency check. The converter efficiency check was conducted 

as per the procedures contained in EPA Method 7E, Section 8.2.4 which requires a conversion of at least 90%. 

As shown an average converter efficiency of 97.34% was achieved for the NO xanalyzer utilized at the Ceric 

Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. 

Table 5.6 displays the EPA Method 25 train leak check audit results which were performed prior to each 

TGNMO concentration run. 

Table 53 displays the HCI and HF collection efficieney. The collection effieiency was determined in 

accordance with the Source Testing Manual (Revision 3.3), Section 2.8 which requires a collection efficiency 

of? 95%. As shown all the collection efficiencies of HCI and HF at both test locations were above the limit. 

Table 5.8 displays the results of the EPA Method 8 Audit Sarnple analysis. The results were transmitted by email to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept, of Environmental Protection. On July 15, 2008, Mr. 

Richwine inforined Air Compliance Testing, Ine. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA 

Method 8, Section 11.4.3 criteria. 

Table 5.9 displays the results of the EPA Method 26A Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted by 

e-mail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. On July 14, 2008, Mr. 

Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA 

Method 26A, Section 11.5.3 criteria. 

Observer Charles Giffels was certified on April 2, 2008 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The expiration date 

is six months from the issue date. 

For quality assurance, the observers obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting 

background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds 

and made to the nearest 5% opacity. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 27 Air Compliance Tesfing, Inc. - 080609 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

5.2 QA/QC Problems 

No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 28 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
o ~ 

v o a 

A 

~ 

C N 

Uj O 

a o 

~ 

~ L 

N 

U 

~ 

^ 

O 

O 

O Y' ~ O ✓1' ~ p° ~^ 

O 

,p U U .p o o ,9eeV 

ro ~ G. a ° V U 

b 

kn 

O 

b 

«I 

~ 

° v 

,ti 

a 

P. Q 

O 

O 

.a 

0 ~V 

0> Q U 

~ ro U 

Q 

M 

0 

~ o 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

y 

0 

O 

0 

~ O 

~ 

~ 

M 

O V 

O 

a 

w 

~ R d 

a 

U U _ 

vl 

a~i 

O 

v 

a 

3 

Q 

b 

E 

CJ 

0 

V 

w 

o 

U ~c i 

0 

U 

m 

0 

rL 

N 

~ 

Q 

O 

U 

~ 

N N 

U 

Q 

~ 

° 

~ 

° 

~ 

° 

~ 

~ m ~ 

»~ y 

~ 

d 

~ 

U 

~ 

w a 

.G 

F 

~ 

~ 

'b 

~ 

Q 

.~ q 

Y. 

F 

~ 

G 

~ 

~ N 

~ A 

N o- 

"L! 

.~ 

~ 

"U. 

O 

~ 

~ 

QI 

W 

ti 

~ 

N 

~ 

~ 

~ 

F 

W O 

O 

N 

~ 

N 

~ 

N 

V N 

N 

C 

~ 

~ 

N 

N 

0 

N N 

~ 
~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ ° 

~ 

s 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

.~ ~ 

U 

~ Q 

~ 

.G 

q 

H 

~ 

~ 

a, 

b 

d' 

q .~ 

H 

~ 

q4 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

QI 

W 

N 

~ 

Vi 

~ 

~ 

O 

m 

a 

~ 

O V 

~ 

u o 

p 

A 

d 

d 

Uj O 

g ° 

C d U a 

O V 

O 

Y y N b .d N N cC N 

~ 

a ~ 

O 

U U 

O 

c •a 

y '~d. I 

O Y 6 

ro 

U 

w~o ,,,, ° 

v 

.d 

C 

x o 

w 

x 0 

Q 

•CJ 

O A~ 

N ~ 

U 

~ 

0 

d• 

~ 

O 

~ 

O N 

° ~ 

•-~ 

O 

p 

O ~ d~•. i'I N 

aC+ ° 

~ 

h 

.~ 

k 

L CG 

pp V V M ° 

u ~ o 

~ 

~r . a 

u ° 

O V 

o 

O 

❑ p ,9 U U ,9 0 0 .o 

a 

Y 

a 

N b 

~ 

~y N 

ci 

id N N 

N U 

c7 c7 

p 

0 ° 

•O 

N N 

F4 .o 

L J ~ 

O ° 

L6 

N 

V C 

N 

d N 

N C 

~ 

7 

N 

N 

~ 

N 

N 

F 
u 

~ 

« ~ 

u ~ 

u 

u 

~ 

'C V .~C d 

d w 

~ w o 

p y e o 

U 

.. w 

d ~ 

L+ ~ 

_ O o 

~ 

U u d 

:? 

• L y V 

on C7 w > o 

4 ~ .0 

d q U 

t6 O 

~ L 

E i W O 

Q1 L 

~

u 

a 

~ N 

V 

u 

~ 

U ~i 

'S7 J ~

L d .1 L 

/r w 

CJ Gl e 

o 

p 

a y 0 

y ~ ~ 

~ vQ Q QI Q 

V] p d Uw d 

w V 

d q U 

R O 

L 

q : Q o rn 

W ~ 

F V ~ 

o 

w d 

QI ~ 

0) 

0 

~ 0 

~ 0 

s 

= 

m G ~ 

N 

F~ 

d 

V 

G W 

4. 

~ O 

U 

a 

Q 

M 

N 

a 

0 

O 

~ 

N 

~ 

C 

W 

V 

N 

N 

C 

3 

~ 

N 

m 

n 

~ 

~ 

h 
~ 

p 

~ 

p 

~ 

0 

~ C 

~ 

w 

~ 

~ 

v 

U 

C 

~ 

~ 

O 

U 

~ 

Q 

d 

~ 

« CL ~ 

u 

d 

~ L 

Ly h 

N A O p 

~ 

~ R a3 

° A ~ a d 

M+ 

u d 

G R G L 

u 

V~ 

u V v c U W 

F y •a 

yu, .+ 

u 

•d 

« 

N L y 

cr 

bD (7 L ✓1 ~ 

L L A 

d A U 

~ o ~a L 

E L Y W ~ o 

N 

1 d 

a ~ 

u 

A 

« N 

u u d 

'O U O G 

w ~ 

~ h 

u A o p 

~ a 3 

h 

0 

aLi 

A~°->Wa o 0 

~ A 

+ f 

d A U 

~ o C7 '~ E V LW o 

L ~ 

a 

M 

m 

a" 

O 

0 

N 

N 

N 

a 

c m 

v N 

N C 

~ 

~ 

N 

N 0 .. 

N 

N F 
1. 

~ 

s 

C~ 

c 

v F. 

d 

u 

c m 

2 

O 

U 

~ 

Q 

d 

a 

~ 

O p o O p o 

~ 

~ 

h 

~ u ~t a 

~ 

~ 

u 

L N O O O 

O p O 

r~ 

y .a 

~ >" z z z z 

6' 

rti 

0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 ++ 

H 

o 4, 

N 

o 4, 

N 

C 

~ 

d 

'~ 

?? 

ro C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 

Q~' 

b • y~ 

" 

N 

~y 

. o 

U 

C 

F

✓y 

u" ,Y 

~ •~ ~ 8 U

~~ 

N 

N 

o 

'a 

0 

w 

. o 

G 

w 

0.1 

U 

V 

~~D 

W 

U 

'.~ 

cn 

w° 

4 

~ 

N 

N 

q 

w 

c 

N 

~D 

•, 

n 

i3 

~ 

o 

m 

M M o~ 

a 

O 

~ 

N 

~ 

c 

m 

N 

N C 

~ 

N 

N O 

m 

m h 
~ A 

H 

a 

C 

N 

C O 

~ 

~ .~ 

U 

L 

~ 

C 

¢ 

O 

"O 

~ 

~ 

W 

~ 

vi 

Y 

~ 

~ 

M 

Of d 

~ 

p 

to 

p 

~ 

0 

~ 

s 

m 

~ 

d ~ 

~ 

C ro 

c 

O U 

~ 

Q 

~ 

~ 

ci 

Gn cl~ V) V) 0 V) 0 V) 

~ 

a 

M 

~ 

~ 

~ = 

0

W W W W cnW 

A 

~ 

CYi 

N ~ ,•- Mp p ~ W 

,G7 ~i 

U ~ A U 0 

0~.r,~ W W 

C 

~ 

~ 

v~ 0 ~n

PL cn' rn cn 

v~ 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

C7 0 C7 0 0 C7 C7 

N 

Q 

o 

~ 

U 

G1 

N 

N ❑ 

O 

• U 

N „ ❑ i0 

y 

❑ 

O 

U 

N 

:~ 

U 

N 

~_ 

`.~ 

o "-~ 

UT 

fCn 

0 

ca 

v~ 

r~ 

o `^. 

DF 

LY~ 

~a 

El 

~n 

°~, 

U 

OL 

N 

~ 

0 

.o 

 U 

 ~ 

~~ ~ OL 

N 

,. 

.fl 

U 

~ 

.~ 

N 

v~ 

. V-+ 

v~ 

•~ 

y 

a 

.~, 

~ 

0 

0 

 ~ N L 

~ 

Q 

•~ 

y 

a 

;j 

U~+ 

0 

t N 

L 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

y 

m 

a 

W 

~ 

N 

N 

o ~ -; 

W 

•~ 

N 

~ 

0 0 N 

N 

v 

m 

N 

N C 

~ 

~ 

N 

N 

~ 

~ N 

H 
~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

s 

~ 

C .~ 

~ 

v ° 

~ ~ .~ 

U 

~ 

Q 

M M 

~ u 

L; ~4 

z z ~ m 

~ 

N U T ¢5 

1 4 

U 

U 

.0 

V 

~ 

U 

C 

~ u 

w W 

~ 

~ 

u 

q O 

U Oy 

Fr 

~ 

~ 

tri 

~ 

~ 

F 

M 

~ 

a 

V 

~ 

~ 

y 

~ 

~ 

W 

C o 

U 

~ ,C7 ~i 

.~ V 

V U 

~ a 

~ 

C 

U 

o 

O

z 

a 

O -M b ~ O 

~ b 

.P. 

w 

O 

z 

a 

? 

,o 

° 

~ 

U 

ro G 

U 

V 

N 

U 

~ U 

O 

V 

~ N 

~ 

~ 

~ 

O 

O 

N 

~ N 

a 

C 

N 

V N 

N 

C 

~ 

~ 

N 

W 

~ 

N 

N 

F 
~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ C 

:. 

N 

ti 

N U C 

ro .Q 

E 

0 

U 

~ Q 

v 

0 

u 

d 

a ~ o a 

~ y N 

~ 3 ~ 

W C ~ 

L 

V 

~ 

~ iqU . N N 

~ 

N 

a 

U .C ~ 

ry~ F a a a 

c 

a 

w 

m M 

m 

a 

~ 0 0 

N 

L6 

N 

V 

C 

N 

V N 

N 

G 

~ 

~ 

N 

W 

~ 

N 

N 

H 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Cornoration - Hanlev Plant 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

EPA M26A 

Sampling Train 

Total Mass of HCI in 

Sample 

(mg) 

Mass of HCI in Last 

Impinger 

(mg) 

HCL Collection 

Efficiency 

(%) 

Run 1 < 6.60 0.08 98.79 

Run2 <4.50 <0.13 100 

Run 3 < 6.43 < 0.14 100 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct 

EPA M26A 

SamplingTrain 

Total Mass of HF in 

Sample 

(mg) 

Mass of HF in Last 

Impinger 

(mg) 

HF Collection 

Efficiency 

(%) 

Run 1 352.17 10.60 96.99 

Run 2 276.52 5.51 98.01 

Run 3 380.14 7.41 98.05 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

EPA M26A 

Sampling Train 

Total Mass of HCl in 

Sample 

(mg) 

Mass of HCI in Last 

Impinger 

(mg) 

HCL Collection 

Efficiency 

(%) 

Run I < 1.22 < 0.16 100 

Run 2 < 1.34 < 0.11 100 

Run 3 < 1.69 < 0.14 100 

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack 

EPA M26A 

Sampling Train 

Total Mass of HF in 

Sample 

(mg) 

Mass of HF in Last 

Impinger 

(mg) 

HF Collection 

Efficiency 

(%) 

Run 1 < 2.67 < 0.16 100 

Run 2 < 2.96 < 0.11 100 

Run 3 < 3.46 < 0.14 100 

The °<" symbol indieates thatcompound was not present in quantitics above tho Minimum Detection Limit 

(MDL) oftheanalytieal method for at least one sample fraetion. 

Table 5.7 - EPA Method 26A Collection Efficiency Results Table 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 37 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

N 

F~. 

U 

U 

C 

ro . Q 

E 

0 

U 

~ 

Q 

I 

M 

N 

kn 

O 

i 

~ ~ N 

~ ~ M 

Q1 

~ M 

r 

M 

00 

O 

~ 

N 

~ 

00 O 

e 

O N ~ 

~ M ~ 

r C 

M 

W 

~ 

Q ~ 

~ b ~+' F 

y.~ O 

7 ~ 

Q~ C 

Q~ U 

~ O 

W V 

b 

~ 

C 

0 

a m 

c4 

~ 

~ 

y 

~ 

~i 

~ 

"C1 

~ 

~ 

~ 

® 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

W 

07 

~ 

~ 

03 ~ 

! 

~ 

m 

a 

ro 0 0 

N 

~ 

N 

D 

C N 

<Y N 

N 

C 

~ 

~ 

N 

m 

0 

l/1 

N 

~ 
rn 

0 

0 0 

~ 

0 

~ 

, 

~ 

~ N 

F~ 

N 

U 

C 

~ 

Q 

~ 

O 

U 

~ 

G 

~ 

~ h Y 

a 

.~ 

... 

b 

~ 

~ 

~i 

~ 

N 

b 

0 

.C7 ~ ~YI 

-/. 

A4 

W 

i 

~ 

~ 

F~ 

M 

N 

m 

a 

N 

M 

r 

N 

~ 

7 

O ~ 

r ~ 

M 

~ 

~ 

~ 

00 

N 

r 

N 

~ 

M O ~ 

M 

i 

~ 

~ 

~ 

A ~ 

H 

v E 

E V 

%p o 

o ~ 

d h 

d ~ 

Wo 

V 

•o 

~ 

C 

0 a v 

RS 

ro 

0 

0 

N 

~ 

N 

~ 

C 

N 

V 

N 

N 

C 

~ 

7 

U1 

(6 

O 

a d 

H 
Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant 

. 1 G".~

\it. ~. 

Appendix attached. 

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 40 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
APPENDIX 

to 

Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

Determination of Total Filterable Particulate 

Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, 

Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total 

Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric 

Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible 

Emissions 

Ceric Kiln 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A 

Glen-Gery Cornoration - Hanlev Plant 

Summeville, Pennsylvania 

Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 

Job Number: 080609 

Prepared by: 

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

, PO BoX 41156 

 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 

Phone:(800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

 Report Date: July 31, 2008 
Appendix Contents 

PROCESS AND CONTRACTED LAB DATA EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS f HISTORY 

Process Operational Data - AII (PRINT) Micromanometer Certificate (when utilized) 

Contracted Lab Analytical Results - AII Dry Gas Meter Calibration History 

Record of Custody Sheets - Contracted

EAcetone

Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History 

ResidualsHistory 131a!?—ov ~ 

FIELD AND INTERNAL LAB DATA 

x Excel Test Data Tabs (PRINT) 

X lExcel Method Speciflc Tab (PRINT) 

X Excel Run Data Tab (PRINT) 

X Example Calculation (PRINT) 

Calibration Gas Certifications 

,e Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification 

x Reference Meter Calibration 

T92 Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration 

Lake Balance (Method 4 and ALT-008) 

Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetrics) 

TVE Azimuth Tables 

x VE Declination 

VE Certificates 

Intent to Test Notification (Compliance Only) (PRINT) 

Record of Custody Sheets - In House 

Test Log (CEMS Methods) 

Main Method Field Data Sheets 

Isokinetic Field Data Sheets 

ACT Laboratory Analysis (titrations) 

Gravimetric Analysis (Method 5, 17, and 202) 

Acetonellnorganic/Organic Residuals Calc. 

EPA Method 9 Field Data 

EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery 

EPA Method 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data 

EPA Method 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation 

EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets 

EPA Method 1 Cyclonic Flow 

EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data 

EPA Method 1 Criteria 

(REAPEAT THIS SECTION FOR EACH STACK) 

ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS 

® Analyzer Calibration Error 

Analyzer System Bias and System Drift 

EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS / CALIBRATIONS 

X 10-Minute Cals - AII 

X Probe Nozzle Inspections - AII (isokinetic Methods) 

Y Pre-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections - AII 

X Post-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Insp. - AII (Cornpliance Only) 

B

B~ C

Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit 

Post-Test Thermocouple Check (Compliance Only) 

Pre-Test Meter Box Leak Check 

Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration 

Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration 

Post-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration 

Post-Test Meter Console Calibration 

*Post Test Calibrations Required for all Mini Meter Boxes and when Yqa does not pass. 

Air Compliance Testing, lnc. -appendix checklists.xls-Appendix Checklist 

A T-MTB - u 13 C T-MTB - 

Gamma Gamma 

Del H 2,0t6 Del H 

Date 5/zg/„A, Date 

T-PRB-6io T-PRBT-PRB -611 T-PRB - 

T-PRB - T-PRB - 

T-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITBAL- y°:~ BALBAL- BALB T-MTB - o16 D T-MTB - 

Gamma o.99q4 Gamma 

Del H 1,715 Del H 

Date Date 

T-PRB -,yo:~ T-PRB - 

T-PRB - 6vff T-PRB - 

T-PRB - T-PRB - 

T-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITBAL- nv _ BALBAL- BAL- 
~ 

cu 

~ oo 

0 N 

CU 

mj N 

U 

a~ O N 

D+ 0- 

~ ~ N 

M ~ N 

S ~ c 

U ~ 

R 

CO 

a) 

p ~ M M 

z a 

m m m 

p c c 

~ ~ o a) o (D 

p~ m p~ m -o -o 

N 

m 

-OC 

ca 

a 

~ m m 

U ~ 

a 

N 

a 

N 

~ F a o 

o 

a w w 

L 

tm N ~ 

CR 

p O 

~ ~ 

~ y 

a .o 

n 

~ m 

S 'a 

N cu ~ U O 

o ~

O 

o 

Iq 

aa ~ ~ 

~ m 

0 

• {p 

U 

m ° o 0 ~ o 

N 

0 

N 

pNj N N 

h ~ ~ 

m m 0 

m 0 O 

J G C Y Y 

3 0 

LL 

J a a a a 

S fl ~ ~ 2 „LO. :D a 

s c~ 

n 

a Q 

co 

~ O E0

00 0 

0 O p EM m ~ 

C' N 

cm 

0 

oo 

0 

ii O ~ 

N 

x 

w 

N yN 

U t0 

U) 

0 

N 

v 

N d 

~ 

m ~ 

~ 0 

a` 

T 

m 

x 
~ 

0 

a 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a 

N 

~ 

O 

~ 

~~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ O 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

po 

00 0 

N 

~ 

a 0 

W 

a 

~ 

6 

A 

~. 

. J 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

U 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ U 

.o 

00 °

o N 

N ~., 

ti 

Y ~ ~ . ti ~ 

¢ 

a 

~ 

N 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ 

~ ~ ~i 

U 

N 

~ 

~ 

O 

U `h 

~ 

-fi U 

ti 

~ 

~ a 

p 

.~ 

>, 

~ 

~ r~^ 

-1 

~ 

Q 

0 ~ 

~ 

U 

q 

~ 

~ 

~ 

N 

0 ~ 

► 

~ 

8 

~ 

zn 

~ 

~ 

Y 

~ 

> 

C 

~ 

h 

v 

1~3 

~ 

`0 

~ 

0 U 

~ 

~ ~ OY 

~ 

~ Ar 

a 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ ~ 

N 

~ 

~ 

O 

~ 

.~ 

~ 

h 

i 

~ 

~ 

~ 

U 

~ 

O y 

q O 

 ~

d 

O ~ o ~ o 

S~l 

~ 

15 

~' ~ +~•, ~i ~ o o ~ '~. '~ i ~ 

w ° •.,~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ o 

14) 4- ~ ~ y ~ T4 

Fr ti N <'ri eF tri 

co 0 0 N 

M 

r~ 
~o 00 C~ 

~O O 00 O~ '-+ [n vi N N ~ ~ O Q N 

p 

rlf. 

II~ 

E 

Ipp 

:~ 

bCp 

• 

y 

b~A 

p, 

p 

II 

. 

O 0 

~ 

0 

II 

II 

~ 

p 

,~II 

0 

~ 

( 

w 

a~ vi 

r. 

o 

U 

r,ti 

eyo 

e 

® u °a 

.~ I . II II II II II ~ 

~ 

0 

~4 2 ~M 

N 

~ 

v ~ 

~ M 

~ ..

V

..i 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ u 

~ 

v 

~ 

8 

~ ~ 

~ s 

p O M 

00 

~-I 

H 

4 ~ 

c~i U O II o 

® ~ 

ur. 

~ o 

H 

1 

~ 

0 

~ 

C'^ 

M 

00 

~ 

kn 

N 

r~ 

e• 

ct 

~ 

~I 

✓~ 

~ 

O 

~ 

~ 

w 

~ w 

~ 

~ 

~ ~ M 

~ O N O oo V) 

N h 

O 00 

cn 

o ~

0) o ~ 

o ^" O 

ci 

II G bA 

CL 

o. h ~ m y V E 5C rti 

Cd ~i, ~ y t~1, vyi Q. ~ O ~ •C It'. .~ ~ V 

C-1 O p w II 

V~y yi C{ Vl II Q N ~ Q c c° a 

. a? 

p„ Cl. ~ 

C13 m 

~ 

00 ✓~ W E+ W (~ ~ ~' V~i t, ~ ~' ~ ✓ ' N `✓ ~ (~,7 IIQ 

~•, O Oi ^~ ~°M° O II z 

co 

0 

N 

M 

N 
~ 

0 

N 

~ 

~ a ~ 

0 

~ 

O 

~ 

C 

~ 

~ 

~ 

CJ 

~ 

a 

~ 0 0 N 

N 

~ 

r~ 

h 

M 

00 

~ 

1 

~ 

O 

~ 

.Q 

~ 

~ 

a 

~ 

~ 

Q . J 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

a ~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

V 

A 

y 

~ 

~ 

C 

~ 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

y 

U 

O 

~ 

~ 

7H 

U 

~ 

C Q 0 -v 

ti 

~ 

H 

ti 

~ 

a 

~ 

~ ti 

~ a+ 

~ 

~ 

O ti 

a. 

"C3 

~ 

N O 

ti 

O 

~ 

C 

.~ U 

.0 

O 

~ 

~ 

6 0 

i 

W W 

N 

M 

N 

~ 

~ LL 

m 

~ 

r 

v~ 

m 

m 

N 

IC) 

~ 

N c 0 _ a 

~ U 

H ~ 

~ 

~ 

N ~ N 

U 

O 

00 o 

~r 

~ ~ a 

~ 

N 

00 N 

o o r; U~ 

c 

Q 

G a 

V ~ 0 u 

W 

~ h 

~F 

U a °O o ~ ° 

U p N N 

~ 

N 

U o r„a ~ 

0 N N 

r~ w ~ 

~ 

Q ~ 

~ C cot ~ 

W 

P~. 1 Q, •w 

ti oMO rr oMO 

r~. oMo 

rA 
M 

Q bW W} O O 

F 7 Q ~~ w 00 00 W 

N 

's' G G 

Q ~~ 

Cy 

~ n✓. et 7 7 7 7 7 

4 M M M M M M 

bll 

rq fN. w 

.~ 

N N N N 

— 

o ~ 

W 

az 

o -- 

o h h h 

~`' b➢ 

4yy ~ x 

o O O 

V1 ct' M 

R

~t—E 

 i~ 

0 ~ ~ 

} 

~ a ~ 

a ~ ~ rA 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD 25 ANALYZER CALIBRATION 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sam le Reco ery and Anai sis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Sirnon 

Calibration 

Gas 

Species 

Cal gas 

conc. 

ppmC 

Analyzer 

ppmC 

range 

Response 

x1Normal 

Area 

Counts 

Response 

xzNormal 

Area 

Counts 

Response 

x3Normal 

Area 

Counts 

Mean 

Response X 

Normal Area 

Counts 

RF Normal 

Area 

Counts/ 

ppmC 

% 

RSD 

Average 

RF 

A-- CO2 50.1 100 51.38 51.65 50.10 51.05 1.0189 1.62 

B-- CO2 50.1 100 49.61 49.89 49.11 4953 0.9887 0.80 1.0038 

B-- CO2 9,933 20,000 10,050 10,047 9,971 10,023 1.0090 0.45 

C-- CO2 9,933 20,000 9,999 9,976 9,965 9,980 1.0047 0.18 1.0069 

A-- NMO 60.30 100 60.03 60.27 60.60 60.30 1.0000 0.48 

A-- NMO 59.73 100 59.74 59.53 59.92 59.73 1.0000 0.32 

B-- NMO 59.73 100 62.26 61.49 62.41 62.1 1.0389 0.79 1.0194 

A-- CH4 48.98 100 48.88 49.07 48.99 48.98 1.0000 0.19 

B-- CH4 48.98 100 49.09 48.92 49.06 49.02 1.0009 0.18 1.0004 

A-- CO 51.03 100 50.16 51.04 51.89 51.03 1.0000 1.70 

B-- CO 51.03 100 52.02 51.49 50.84 51.45 1.0082 1.15 1.0041 

7/3/2008, PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesviile, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 
PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABS, INC. US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS DATA 

PAL Job No: M25-0837 

Client Name and Sample receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. S'tmon 

Samp[e ID Vessel Species 

Ctmj and Ccmk 

Analyzer Responses in 

lized area counts 

Ctm & 

Ccm, 

Mean 

normal 

counts 

Disptay 

Range 

ppmc 

(for 

reference 

only) 

Calib. 

factors 

RF 

Normal 

Area 

counts 

/ppmC 

ppm in 

Sample 

Gas 

TGNMO 

ppmC, 

Ct & 

Cc 

M250837-609-1 Tank-108 COz 9,039 9,111 9,091 20,000 B, C 1.0069 18,213 

AV/SV = 2.017 

C ~ , NMO 

as C 

F9, 

 9.9 10.9 10.1 100 A, B 1.0194 20.0 20.0 

CH4 43.92 44.62 44.03 44.2 100 A, B 1.0004 89.1 

CO 107.7 110.9 108.5 109.0 200 A, B 1.004 1 219.1 

trap-1018 ICV-147 

C" VOC 

as CO2 16.8 15.7 16.4 16.3 50 A, B 1.0038 17.0 

AV/SV = 1 1.048 NMO 1.27 1.29 1.31 1.31 50 A, B 1 1.0194 1.31 18.3 

M250837-609-1 Tank-132 COz 11,219 11,247 11,271 11,246 20,000 B, C 1.0069 24,475 

AV/SV = 1191 

Ct , NMO 

as C 10.9 10.7 10.1 10.5 100 A, B 1.0194 22.7 

~ 

22.7 

CH4 48.90 48.46 48.36 48.6 100 A, B 1.0004 106.4 

CO 118.2 118.1 119.2 118.5 200 A, B 1.0041 258.7 

trap-1082 ICV-148 

C" VOC 

as CO2 29.1 30.2 29.4 29.6 50 A, B 1.0038 32.9 

AV/SV = 1.117 INMO 0.60 0.59 0.621 0.6 50 1 A, B 1.01941 0.7 33.6 

M250837-609-1 Tank-177 C 11,987 11,955 11,850 11,931 20,000 B, C 1.0069 21,820 

AV/SV = 1.842 

C„ NMO 

as C 13.2 12.5 12.1 12.6 100 A, B 1.0194 22.8 22.8 

CH4 53. 27 53.28 53.37 53.3 100 A, B 1.0004 98.1 

CO 129.5 129.9 130.3 129.9 200 A, B 1.0041 238.2 _ 

trap-1095 ICV-149 

C" VOC 

as CO2 20.9 21.1 21.9 21.3 50 A, B 1.0038 20.1 

AV/SV = 0.949 NMO 1 0.98 1.03 1.00 1.0 50 1 A, B 1 1.0194 0.9 1 21.1 

7/3/2008 PAL, Inc. 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891 
~ 

b , W a 4 N 

~ ~ y 

a ✓+ ~ 

~ N 

~ 

.0 

i •y~ .o 'J r

~ ~ w 

pt ~ 

, z78 ~ 

.L q 

~ ~ ~ Q N 

E'•i ~ t~a 

W ~ u ~ ~T- ...

W)

JJl 

 H 

 Z 

I 

~ 

\ 

` 

O ~ 

° 
Method 25 Record of Custody Sheet 

Shipping/Transportation Contalner Number: ~71L _ Lnats: ~• f ~~ 

^noler Number: 

~ I • -- 

~ = _ ~~~I 

/.r.l• 

~/~~.L-1C~ 

I • • 

~ ~ 

1 : / . I • 

i 

,..e, 

1:1• • ~ 

: ♦ Y ~ ~ 

~~~~~~A '~ ~ 

~~ / • ~= i 

(Trap # 

1 : 1 . 1 ! i n ' 

080609 ~lfi.~~~~C/~,1~ 

~A~l~_~~~1~~'h'f'~~ 

i 

-{• • ' I d~~_%~~'~ r~ ~~t. ~ I~ 

~I 1:/.{. . ~~ er~~--~.~ 

,~~.~.~~ff,. ~ ,• ~~ J 

{ 8 / . { • i ~ on 

n 

n 

Were all seals intect?l vz~ 

Kecetved By Samp{e Custodian 

reasor~ngin the "Remark ' 

~ 

'-aps put in cooler by 

Remarks: 

, AirComFlrance TeatJrrg, lnc. 

'.. (Method25.xls•RecardofCustodysheet)811712ooa 

(Dele) 

(1'OO 

(Time) 

Job Number Q$Q6Q9 B 

Done 8y 1 Date: ~ ( % t lJa 

Flha! Check By! Date: J(~ 1 7. 1, <7e 
PREClSiONANALY7ICAL LABORATOR/£S, INC 

2906 MvV 67T1•1 PLACE, SU17E,4, GAINESVfLL£, FLORIDA 32653 

(352) 335-9889 FlIX j352J 33&1892 

US EPA Reference Method 25 Sample Calcutations 

Notes: . 

(1.) PAL .uses calibrated piezoelectric digital absolute pressure gauges as well as open ended 

nnercury (Hg) fitled u-tube manometers for field and laboratory pressure measurements, 

' Pressu,ies measured wifh, open ended Hg manometers are corrected to ab.solute (standarcl) pressures 

using,the following relation: (a6solute P) =(measured P) +(barometric P) 

' (2.) Ternperatures are recorded in °F or °C and converted to Kelvins using the following relations: 

{°F-32)I1.8 + 273:15 = K, and °C + 273.15 = K Standard temperature = 20"C = 293.15K 

(3.) Insome cases, the equations listed below are expanded versions of those presented in 

' 40CFR F't. 60, App. A, Meth, 25 ;pp. 850-851 (Rev. July 1993). 

' (4.) The foliowing relations are relevant to the equations below: 

293.15K / 760 mm Hg = 0.3857 K/mm Hg 1 atmosphere =1013 mbar = 760 mm Hg = 29.92" Hg 

293.15K/1013 mbar = 0.2894 Klmbar 1" Hg pressure = 33.863 mbar = 25.401 mm Hyg 

293.151C129.92" Hg = 9.798 Kfin. Hg 

Tfie fotiowing terms are used in the equations below: 

C= TGNMO concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent 

Ce = Caiculated condensibte organic (condensate trap) concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent 

Ccm = Measured cohcentration (NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap ICV, ppm. CO2 + TH. 

Ct- Caiculated noncondensible organic concentration (sample tank) of the effluent, ppm C equivalent, 

Ctm = Measured concentration (NMO Anaiyzer) for the sampte tank, ppm NMO. 

mc = TGNMO mass concentrationof the effluent, mg C/dscm 

F a sample flow rate; cc/mtn. 

Pf = Final pressure of the ICV, inches of Hg, absolute. 

Pb = Barometric pre5sure, inches of Hg or mbar (29.92" Hg = 1013 mbar) 

Pti = Gas sample tank pressure before sampiing, mbar absolute. 

Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, mbar absolute. 

Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure affer pressurizing, inches Hg absolute. 

Tf = Final teittperature of ICV, Kelvins. 

Tti = Sampie tank temperature before sampling, Kelvins. 

Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling, Kelvins. 

Ttf = Sarnple tank temperature after pressurizing, Kelvins. 

V = Sample tank volume, (cc). 

Vv = ICV volume, Cc. 

Vs = gas voluine sampled, cc. 

Vt = Sample train volume, cc. (Dimensional calculations yield Ct = 60 cc for PAL trains.) 

n= number of data points 

q= total number of analyzer injections of ICV during analysis (where k=injection number, 1, ..., q). 

r= total number of analyzer injections of sampie tank during analysis (where j=injection number, 1, ..., r). : 

xi = individuai measurements. ' 

x = mean value 

eP = Allowable pressure change, inches Hg. 

© = Leak check period, minutes, 

a 

; 

~~ 
PREC1S10N ANALYTlCAL LABORATORIES, INC 

2106 NW 67TN PLACE, SUITE 4, GA/NESVILLE, FLORiDA 32653 

(352) 335-1889 FAX (352) 335-1891 

Method-25 Caiculations 

Tank Vo/umes 

Procedure: Each tank was weighed to the nearest gram while filled with ambient air and while filled with 

degassed distilled water. The temperature of the water was measured and the volume of the tank calculated. 

V=[wt. of tank + water (g)] -[wt. of tank + air (g)] /[density of water at the recorded temp. (g/cc)] 

Pre-SamAlina Leak Check Allowable Pressure Chanae 

eP =(0.01)(F)(Pb)(e)/Vt = [(0.01)(100 cc/min)(Pb)(5 min)] /[ 60 cc] 

eP = 2.5" Hg for a barometric pressure (Pb) of 29.92" Hg. 

SamD/e Vo/ume 

Vs = (.3857)M [(Pt/Tt) - (PtifTti)], or 'Vs = (0.2894)(1/) [(Pt/Tt) - (Ptil1'ti] 

"This equation includes a constant for pressure expressed in mbar 

Noncondensible Oraanics, Ct 

Notes: Response factor =(calibration gas concentration, ppm as C)/(nstrument response, ppm as C) 

The M-25 analyzer has a reproducble interference of 2.3 ppm NM as C per % CO2 in the sample gas stream. 

Ct =[Ptf/Ttf) / (Pt/Tt)-Pti/Ttq1/r E6=1, ..r)Ctmj] - [CO2 interference]) = (Analysis V / Vs) (Ctm) 

where Ctm =([1/r S6=1, ..r)Ctmj] -[CO2 interference]) =[(avg NM integrator response) (integrator range, ppm) 

(response factor) /(1000 units full scale)]-[(% CO2 in tank at Ptf) (2.3 ppm NM as C interference/°/"CO2)j 

Condensible Oraanics, Cc 

Cc = (0.3857) (Vv/Vs) [1/q E(k=1, ..q)Ccmk] (Pf/Tf) 

where [1/q S(k=1, ..q)Ccmk] 

and Ccm =(average CO2 peak ht. )/(1000 ht. units full scale) (CO2 range, ppm) (response factor) 

TGNMO Concentration TGNMO Mass Concentration 

C = Ct + Cc mc, mg/dscm =( 0.4993) (C) 
U 

z 

(d 

LdJ 

x 

O 

~ 

O 

m 

1, 

t, o 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

~r., , V N M Ob c}' h M t'~ cT ~O O~ ~D r+ rt' d' N M U, d• V'i O 

o O b0 t"~ ~O h O O 00 O~ O~ O h ~D bb C, r~ O O~ b0 O~ 

O~ ~ O~ O O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O O\ O~ O~ 

ob Oi 

..,_d' 

~ v) M_O\ 

_~ h _~ ._~ 

._V' O N C 

o U a~d OO ON 0 Vl d' O ~ p h ~ O ~~• a o 00 d' M ~ Q 

t,~ '"j b M M M M M 

'1," 

v ~ ~ ?O • C~h;3 ?q ,Cy2 ~ ,bp~+` M ®,C~3 

rp 

00 

tzt rV N rV ~~ rn N ~H ~~ vi tV rn m~ 

00 V C 

N ~' vMi 

~i CV ~ tV O d f~l M H bQ V 

~ ------- ~ ~ ----- ~ ~ - Wbq ~ 

v c~ U ~ ~ 

 0 o pV' C~~ ? ~O Oi oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 00 00 O ~ 

~ V'~ ~ N ~ r` ~^ M N tn ~ Oi CT o0 ~+ 

~ N 

C bA .N Q ~ `" M bb ob N N N ,-~ •-~ ~ h -+ ~p 

N ~ N 

+-+ N R3 N N N M M 

U a 

M O~ 01 4\ oo O O~ 

O bp o V ~ ri 

.-. 

vi ~ ri ~ n vi 

,-~ vi ,-+ 

d= ~Y 

,-. 

ct' d" 

.- ~ vi .-~ 

rr" 

,-~ 

~ 

> ~ y 

N cct V ~ N q ~ q _ 

N w 

00 00 O O O Vl tn 

~y y U O ~D 00 00 ~1 ~ Vl M M M h 

O~ 

C^ O 

Ed c'C ,~ ~ V rn N N O O O 00 O 

~❑ ~ w 

vi tn In 

~ aqi 

vi vi vi V <Y vi 

Z ~A P~ N td 00 N.d ~ 

q a, L 

.~ C3 

O 

_ 00 r, M N 

h 

O 

O~ 

N M 

M 

`'~ ❑ ~ O ~vi N CC ~y F. Qi O~ O ob 00 Cb N N 

ct vi vi 

a ... p ~ •fl G V ~" 4" (Sy bb 00 bb VD \O 00 OO OO 00 OO 

y 

 dMi O b0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ v~i ~ ph ~ ~ II N 

~~ 

 y-~ •rN 

 q 

 ~ r 

 'TS C> ~ 

W ~' 

 Q" 

 M 

N 

Q O M 

N 

 d' 

N 

 N 

N 

 M 

N 

 7 

N 

 N 

N 

 N 

N N 

 N 

N N N 

~ O o.__N _ .-...._ _~,. . 

r- 

_.

W) - M 07 N 

h h h 

N 

~ ,-+ +-' ~ 

v 

• 

• ~ 

v~ 

.-. ,~ 

ry ~ 

U ~ 

['~ 

,—~ 

[~ 

,—~ 

~ ~D 

,—. 

Vl 

,—. 

P 

~ ,—, ~ 

~ 

,—. 

h~ ~ 

a> II p 

bA 

aVa j • ai +~ ..'"q 

bA 

~^ G" ~ r~• ~O c- 00 M 

d' 

d' 

d' 

~ 

bb O~ 00 M ~ d i/1 ~ ~p 

~,~ N~ r~ ~ ~ V 

U 

O ? 

U"y q 

'+~ •L7 N •p o M O N •N _-__ ~ 

.-p oo y ~ ~, "O 

u N ~ N Y l U y ~ bA v ~O °b 

6 

ob . O ~ n M tiD ob C~^ 

"r-• <Ga dN- a~i ~ ~ cd e,~ Oi O~ " 

~ M C~ ~f t~ m d0• m 

> •[ C ~ -G ~ O ~•' U H _. - _ ___ __ _ _ -__ — - 

V G ~ ~ G G ^ G CJ Y C C C 

w m ^cJ O .o C'•~' U eC ~5 tC eC aS Rt RI V V V 

a 

~ af ~ 4• ~ H e i4 SE Y! Yd C4 OE V G G G •O 9J 

"G3 

Y 

"O 0 v i+ H G ^ .q .q T. .0 i

" ~" "q 'O "O 

GT~ ~

j,." • ~+ ~ 

U U N M t` OO O, 

N 

tx

>Cf V ~ ~' ~' G C G ~ ~ G C C ~ G ~ ~ 

U Oa. UQ" V1 Pi f~+ tYi L~ 0.~i f~i tYi L'~ (yi fyi f~i f~i 

OC) 

~ 

M 

m 

9 U 

~ 

ai 

m (X) I 

L6 M 

m 

~ 

~ 

N 

C 

O 

.0 

a 

N1 

~ 

N M 

ro 

ca 

p 

LL 

N 

.N 

N 

C ~ 

~ 

V 

(/7 

V 

w 

a 

y 

co 

Z 

O 

r N 

U 

c 

N N 

O 

Co 

a 

J 

U_ 

N 

Q 

C . 0 N 

U ~ 

a 

O 

N 

~ 

~ 

r 
iR L /~o ~Q~J~~~ ScoflSpeciahyGases ~ a

~J (1 -1

~TA~ CI'~`S 

Air Liquide America Specialty Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226 I 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas ~ 

Assay Laboratory Customer 

P.O. No.: 792736 AIR CONSULTING & ENGRING 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-82649-001 

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

I 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol For Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; .'.. 

Procedure G-1; September, 1997. , I 

Cylinder Number: ALM055366 Certification Date: 28May2008 Exp. Date: 28May2011 

Cylinder Pressure***: 2000 PSIG 

 ' ANALYTICAL . COMPONENT CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) ACCURACY" TRACEABILITY 

PROPANE 21.1 PPM +/- 1 ek Direct NIST and NMi 

AIR BALANCE 

*** Do not use when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig. . 

* Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure Gt, September 1997. 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

TYPE/SRM NO. EXPIRATION DATE CYLINDER NUMBER CONCENTRATION COMPONENT 

NTRM 1667 04Ju12008 ALMO22121 49.80 PPM PROPANE ' 

INSTRUMENTATION 

INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST CALIBRATED . ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE ..... VARIAN/3300/7945 28May2008 . GC/PID 

ANALYZER READINGS 

(Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas T=Test Gas r=Corre)ation Coefficient) 

First Triad Analysis Second Triad Anatysis CaRbration Curve '...... 

PROPANE 

Dato: 28May2008 Response UniCAREA Concantratlon=A+9x+CS2+De3+Ez4 ~ 

Z1=0.00000 R1=252854.0 Tt=101663.0 r=.9999997 1668 . 

112=252599.0 Z2=0.00000 T2=101846.0 Cunstants: A=4.82868802 ~ 

Z3=0.00000 T3=101775.0 R3=252538.0 e=1.96999E-04 C=1.31022E-12 

AvO. Concentration: 20.10 PPM D= E_ 

~ . . • ~ . ~ 

C. 

Page 1 of 1 
Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

IN1290 

Scott Specialty Gases 

 COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 248-689-213 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay Laboratory Customer 

P.O. No.: PAL RCbt AI ~SULTING & ENGINEERING 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 05-43082-008 

1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

TROY,M148083 SUITE #10 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

This certification was performed according to EPA Traceablrty,Protocol For Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G-1; September, 1997. 

Cylinder Number: ALM013029 , ~,, ~ "'Certification Date: 17May2006 Exp. Date: 16May2009 

Cylinder Pressure***: 1950,PSIG 

CONIPONENT . OERTiFIED CONCENTRATIONWoles) ACGURACY**TRACEABILITY 

CA ON DIOXIDE 9,933 .- PPM, +/- 1% ~'~:. Direct NIST and NMi 

CARBON MONOXIDE 51.'03 PPM +/- 1%. ~ Direct NIST and NMi 

METHANE 48:98 PPM - Direct NIST and NMi 

PROPANE 19•91 PPM 1% ` Direct NIST and NMi 

AIR BALANCE„ 

'*' Do not use when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig. 

Analytical accuracy is base,d on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G7; September 1997. 

REFERENCE STANDARD . 

TYPE/SRM NO . EXPIRATION DATE ' CYLINDER NUMI3ER -- CONCENTRATION COMPONENT: 

NTRM 2300 O1Jan2008 ALM049142 CARBON DIOXiDE 

NTRM 1679 02Apr2007 ALMO26128 44.90 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE 

NTRM 2750 01Mar2007 ALM009178 43:80 PPM METHANE -?!~ 

NTRM 1667 04Ju12008 ALM019225 ' 49 SM PROPANE 

INSTRUMENTATION 

INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST CALIBRATED °-,; ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

VARIAN/3400/10693 04May2006j;, < THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY 

HORIBA/AtA-220/57297601 15lNay2006'-. ' NDIR 

VARIAN/3400/7506 25Apr2006 TCD/FID 

VARIAN/360010455 FLAME IONIZATION 

ANALYZER READINGS 

-~ Zero Gas R Re erence Gas!:' =, est' as '{.= orrelation oe icient 

First Triad Analysls Second Tr'iad Analysis Calibration Curve 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

Date: 04May2006 Response Unit:MV Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 

Z7 =0.00000 R1 =1165579. T7 =50484.00 =0.999999 

R2=1167434. Z2=0.00000 T2=50233.00 Constants: A=-0.012965 

Z3=0.00000 T3=50126.00 R3=1165977. B=0.00002 C=0 

Avg. Concentration: 9933, PPM D=0 E=0 

CARBON MONOXIDE 

Date: 08May2006 Response Unit:PPM Date: 1510ay2006 Response Unit: PPM Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 

Z7=0.00000 R1=105.0000 T7=57.10000 Z1=0.00000 R1=105.0000 T1=57.00000 r=0.999992 

R2=104.9000 Z2=0.00000 T2=57.10000 R2=104.9000 Z2=0.00000 T2=56.90000 Constants: A=0.661739 

Z3=0.00000 T3=57.00000 R3=104.8000 Z3=0.00000 T3=56.90000 R3=105.2000 B=0.870621 C=0.000317 

Avg. Concentration: 50.81 PPM Avg. Concentration: 51.24 PPM ' D=0 E=0 

METHANE 

Date: 16May2006 Response Unit:AREA Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 

Z1=0.00000 R7=3703708. T7=376479.0 r=0.999989 

R2=3702348. Z2=0.00000 T2=376799.0 Constants: A=-1.545108 

Z3=0.00000 T3=376546.0 R3=3691 508. 8=0.000133 C=0 

Avg. Concentration: 48.98 PPM D=0 E=0 

PROPANE 

Date: 09May2006 Response Unit:AREA Concentration = A + Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 

Zt =0.00000 R1 =51668.00 T7 =20604.00 r=0.999994 

R2=51663.00 Z2=0.00000 T2=20547.00 Constants: A=0.081195 

Z3=0.00000 T3=20588.00 R3=51621.00 8=0.000975 C=0 
1 Cj Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Arialyzed Calzbration Statidard 101290 COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 24 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay Laboratory Customer 

P.O. No.: PAL AIR—CUN—SULTING & ENGINEERING 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 05-43082-008 . 1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

TROY,MI 48083 

2106 E NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

I nis certitication was pertorrned according to tf'A I raceability Protocol t-or Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G-1) September, 1997. 

Cylinder Number: ALM013029 Certification Date: 17May2006 Exp. Date: 16May2009 

Cylinder Pressure***: 1950 PSIG 

ANALYZER READINGS 

(Z..=. ero Gas R Reference Gas T= est Gas r= orre atlon oe Iclent) 

First Triad Analysis Second Triad Analysis:I .. Calibration Curve 

Special Notes: REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 9 GAS MIX) 

APPROVED BY: ~ A n 

~- 911LARY THAT HLIR 
(, a i a q s 2 Ss 

~ 

i/ t ~ 

, 

r 93'. 4O"i. ~ iCi— ~ I it~ ~ o~ n 4m- an I y, 

CD 

C7J yr . _., . • ' m , . mC5r 67 

^~ 

~.~. ~ tr3 fS1 LO ClJ' 1...> 

1~'- 

.. 

~y 

. w~w 

; , r, 

ff? F ; 4)93- i i,, • 

u r R's4/ a rv 

~s E s 

~J U r`;. 

' IuJ t Cli, x~u~ O 

N ml 

co 

i Q'll 

g ~t ay r~ r:,.r 

~ z ~ z ~ r " Q (3=- 

dK ck:z _ ~ . 

cm 

I 

r Q~ ff 0 )- 

C.U. -: 

-45' f~A: ~~ . ~ ~ 1 •l7~ W / r? k t: ID 

_' 

/rl`f/r ➢ ~ V J 63 ~

CS31 

l:._ 

O'll 0 O01 EEY ~ {. 1 »~ QW'V' 

l.r r v C3 EC C!f ' 61 t~J 00 rtR 1 ~F,— ru /`qr. 

Rr 1 ^6 t Y s ~/ a• / (~, £Fl ~Sr' 6{ rx 1:, l'W cr" E'Ff r N.F 

l k f4' 

4~~:~/p'~ik^T'q'%l('~.'^' /S~/!° ~~'?: e~M~^e~ u i ^ rt - . ^S . ... .w «:.L~~. ...>....~~,.....~ ... ..~._ ,.:...., . I 

a . e 
im Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Certdfied Calibration Standard 

` one: ax: 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard 

Product Information 

—Prolect '— N~i-49994-010 

Item No.: 0102C5002820AL 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Cylinder Number: ALM004892 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 15May2006 

Expiration Date: 14May2009 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

Component Name 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

CARBON MONOXIDE 

METHANE 

PROPANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY ' 

Description 

~:+.. 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #10 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

c 

APPROVED BY: DATE: 

JOHN C.ITZ 

Page 1 of 2 
SPECIFICATIONS ~ J r . Blend 

Blend 

Process A;alytica4 

Requested Gravimetric Anaiyzed Toierance Accuracy Accuracy Interlocking 

Concentration Concentration Concentration Result Result Result Result 

Component Name (Moies) (Moies) (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %) 

CARHON DIOXIDE 25,000. PPM 25,000. PPM 25,100. PPM .0 1.00 1.00 .40 

CARHON MONOXIDE 9,000. PPy 9,010. PPM 9,030. PPM .1 1.00 1100 .20 

METBANE 9,000. PLRM 9,010. PPM 9,000. PPM .1 1100 1.00 .10 

PROPANE 3,000. PPM 3,000. PPM 2,990. PPM .0 1.00 1.00 .30 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceabilitv 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Anaivtical Traceabilit 

Type/SRM No. Ecpiration Date 

GMIS 3 COMP 14Jun2006 

GMIS 3 COMP 14Jun2006 

CH4/N2 2.5% 12Dec2007 

C3H8/N2 .33% 23Ju12006 

Instrumentation 

Instrument/Modei/Serial# 

MTI/M20 0/1 709 2 7 

MTI/M20 0/1 709 27 

MTI/M20 0/1 709 2 7 

MTI/M200/170927 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Traceability To 

NIST 

Cviinder Number Concentration Component 

ALM066991 16.00 96 CARBON DIOXIDE 

ALM066991 7010. PPM CARBON MONOXIDE 

A11789 2.506 % METHANE 

K011239 3301. PPM PROPANE 

Date Last Calibrated Anaivtical Princiole Anaiytical Method 

O1May2006 GC-TCD 

O1May2006 GC-TCD 

15May2006 GC-TCD 

15May2006 GC-TCD 

Pressure: 2000 PSIG 

Expiration Date: 14May2009 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Do not use or store cylinder at or beiow the stated dew point temperature. Possibie condensation of heavier 

components couid resuit. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, piace cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roil cyiinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of caiibration standards at or below dew 'point temperature may resuit in caiibration error. 

COMMENTS 

REP:TQ06-1227(ITEM 11 GAS MIX) 

DISCOUNT PER J.MUNLEY/D.HUDGEN 

ORIGINAL QUOTE @ $ 1600 

Page 2 of 2 
:.-Concentration Accuracy 

(Moles) 

1.00 % 1 

BALANCE .,r. 

Traceability Type :. Traceable To 

9ABILITY WEIGHT NIST 

LITY GAS S7ANDARDS: , SRS 

Component Name 

METHANE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

BLEND 

ANALY 

Descri tinn 

Scott Specialty Gases I_ 741 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, 

110U7o 

Calibration Standard 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard 

Product Information Customer 

roject No.: 01-4 994-004 

Item No.: 01022713 OAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

P.O. No.: PAL SUITE #10 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

Cylinder Number: ALMO26874 GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 12May2006 

Expiration Date: 11 May2009 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

I_177Ti]r197e?,fl ~ ~ DATE: 

JOHN Y..FI~Z 

Page 1 of 2 
Requested 

Concentration 

(Moles) 

1. °a 

( 

~ . 

SPECIFICfaT10NS 

N1N:L 

AIR 

1,00 r"i.° C' 

K

~ Blend 

(O Blend Process Analytica9 

Gravimetnc Analyzed Toierance Accuracy Accuracy Interiocking 

Concentration Concentration Result Resuit Result Result 

(Moles). (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %) 

1:00 % 0.99 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 

1 :314i~y 

Process Traceabiiity 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Analytical Traceability 

Type/SRM No. Expiration Date 

CH41N2 2.5% 12Dec2007 

Instrumentation 

instrument/Modei/Seriai# . MTI/M200/170927 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cyiinder Size: AL 

Traceability To 

NIST 

Cylinder Number Concentration Component 

A11789 2.506 % METHANE 

Date Last Calibrated Analytical Principle Anaiytical Method 

12May2006 GC-TCD 

Pressure: 1660 PSIG 

Expiration Date: 11 May2009 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. in the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, p(ace cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of caiibration standards at or beiow dew point temperature may resuit in caiibration error. 

COMMENTS 

REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 4 GAS MIX) 

FLAM-OX RESTRICTION:--1670 PSIA 

1 Page 2 of 2 
997~ C~ im Scott Specialty Ga Dual-Analyzed Calzbration Standard 

 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1,PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assay Laboratory Customer 

P.O. No.: PAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-49994-005 

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 SUITE #10 

PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION g ___...... , 

This certification was performed according to EPA Traceablhty ProLocol For "Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; 

Procedure G-1; September, 1997. 

Cylinder Number: ALMO23042 Certification Date: O8May2006 Exp. Date: 07May2009 

Cylinder -Pressure***: 2Q00 P91G 

ANALY,T.ICAL 

COMPONENT CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) ACCURACY* * TRACEABILITY 

CARBON DIO)CIDE 9,570.' ~

C~ PPM Direct NIST and'NMi 

AIR BALANCE; 

Do not use when cylinder,.`pressure is below 150 

" Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G7,-13eptember 1997. 

REFERENCE STANDARD; 

TYPE/SRM N0. EXPIRATION DATE CYLINDER NUMBER ..' CONCENTRATION COMPONENT 

NTRM 2622 03Apr2007 ALMO24821 2;008 % CARBON DIOXIDE 

INSTRUMENTATION 

INSTRUMENTlMODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST 6ALIBRATED s'ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

MTI/M200/170927 01May2006, "`;' GC-TCD 

ANALYZER READINC3S<> 

(Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas'- T=Test Gas "r=Correlation Coefficient) 

First Triad Analysis Second Triad:Analysis Calibration Curve 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

Date: 0SMay2006 Response Unit:AREA Ooncentration=A+Bz+Cx2+13z3+Ex4 

Z1=0.00000 111=91499.00 T1=46100.00 r=.999983 2622 

112=91647.00 22=0.00000 T2=46088.00 . ~ Constants: A=-6.1770E-03 

Z3=0.00000 T3=46139.00 R3=91662.00 ~ 8=2.1776E-06 C= 

Avg. Concentration: 9970. PPM D= E_ 

Special Notes: ref:TQ 122 

APPROVED BY: 

HN 0. -LTZ~~ ' 
$PECIFICATIONS q ~ r~~ C~ ~ alend Procesy 

' Re uested ~tirauqn~et..ric Tolerance Accurac 

Concentration Concentratfon Result Result 

Component Name (Moles) (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %) 

CARHON DIOXIDE 4. °s 4.00 % .0 1.00 

NITRCGEN . BAL HAL . 

Process Traceability 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Traceability To 

NIST 

Pressure: 2015 PSIG 

Expiration Date: 14May2008 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error. 

Page 2 of 2 
/r`21 

~; . ~ • . 

~ ~

/ Dual-Certified Calibration Standard 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard 

Product Information 

Prolect ^ IVo.: 01-49994-007 

Item No.: 010200004300AL 

P.O. No.: PAL 

Cylinder Number: ALM006827 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Certification Date: 12May2006 

Expiration Date: 11 May2008 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION 

Component Name' 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Description 

BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY 

ANALYTICAL TRACEABILITY 

Customer 

AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING 

SUITE #10 

2106 NW 67TH PLACE 

GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 

Concentration Accuracy 

(Moles) (+/-%) 

50.1 PPM 1 

BALANCE 

Traceability Type Traceable To 

WEIGHT NIST 

GAS STANDARDS SRS 

1 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ j 

~1~~ d Y 

Scott speciaPiy Gases 

A[R CON5ULilNG & ENGRING Certificate of Accuracy 

P0 No. 79P735 ~ CA9 Reg, Component No. Camponent Certlffed ) 

124-38=9 Anal ala 

CAR60N O(0X10E ~ !c ' 132259•16-0 ~ 50.1 PPM/ 

9AL i 

A!R 

--------------------------- 

---------•-•------•- 

Analyala 0ate 23Ma 2008 y ProJect No 01-61928 

Explratlon 0ate 23May2010 Analyst JOE 5MIiN . Cylinder t ALM0068P7 

Grade REPERENCE CLASS ttem No.010200004300AL 

Raorder/5ervlce Contact ~800)331-4953 PLUMSiEAOVtLLE PA 19949 

APPROVED BY: DATE: 

NIKOLA OZNY 

Page `1 of 2 
Cylinder Number 

ALM031683 

Concentration 

150.0 PPM 

Component 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

SPECIFICATIONS 5`' rI -"~ Blend Process Analyticcl 

Requested Gravl Analyzed Tolerance Accuracy Accuracy Interlocking 

Co;Molesjion Result 

(+R /SU%) (+R /SU%) (+R /su53) Connnnt~ration Co

lMolesl

ion 

C'SFEOPi DIO%SDE 50, PPM 50.1 PPM 50.0 PPM 2 1.00 1.00 .10 

AIR 

TRACEABILITY 

Process Traceability 

Method 

GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

Analytical Traceability 

Type/SRM ~ No. Expiration Date 

CO2/N2 .015% 21Jun2006 

Instrumentation 

Instrument/Model/Serial# 

SIEMENS/ULTRAMAT 6E/RB-236 

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

Cylinder Size: AL 

Traceability To_ 

NIST 

Date Last Calibrated Anal)dical Principle Anaiytical Method 

12May2006 CO/CO2 ANALYZER 

Pressure: 2000 PSIG 

Expiration Date: 11May2008 

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS 

Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier 

components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew 

point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration ereor. 

COMMENTS 

REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 8 GAS MIX) 

f — (f Vg:P,40 

~y..~C~~ t J _._.~- ...,_v...~.e..'-rr.e- ~ :~~ h _ ` peciaity Gases ~ ----- 

AIR OONSULitNO G ENORINO Certifitatc of Accuracy 

Pd No. 782735 

CAS Reg. Component ND, Camponent Csrt ff fed 

Anat sls 

124-3B-9 CARBON DIOXIDE 132259•!0•a 50.1 PPM/ 81R 

...................................

... 

BAL 

Analysls Date 23May2B08 ProJect No 01 ,91$28 

Explration Oate 23May2610 Analyat JOE SM[iH Cyllnder e AL0006827 

Orade REfERENCE OLASS f tero No.6t0P000B4300AL 

....,,., --------------°---- ~f~ '< Reordbr/SePVice Cootaot 8@0)33! 4953 pLUMSTEiOVlLLE PA 16899 Y 

r 

:~ 
First Analytical Laboratories 

ANALYSIS REPORT 

Method 26A 

Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid 

Project # 080609 

Prepared for: 

Air Compliance Testing 

5525 Canal Road 

Valley View, OH 44125 

Reviewed and Approved by: 

ti1 wat~-, 

William H. Wadlin, Ph. D. 

Laboratory Manager 

July 11, 2008 

Do not reproduce this report except in whole without the permission of the laboratory. 

1 of 22 
First Analytical Laboratories 

CASE NARRATIVE 

Project #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Ju1-08 

Client: Air Compliance Testing 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Samples: 

Twenty-five samples were submitted for determination of hydrochloric acid 

and hydrofluoric acid by method 26A, one of which was the field blank. Two audit 

samples were included with this project. The samples were received in good 

condition with no apparent leakage. Any remaining amounts of the samples will be 

retained by the laboratory for six months and then discarded. 

Preparation: 

No sample preparation was required. A minimum dilution of 20X is required 

to prevent column saturation by the sulfate ion contributed by the 0.1 N sulfuric acid 

matrix. 

Analysis: 

HCl and HF were determined as chloride and fluoride respectively by Ion 

Chromatography with conductivity detection (IC). 

Results: 

The results are presented as total milligrams of HCl and HF trapped in the 

whole solution. HCl was measurable in seven of the twenty-four field samples, and 

ranged from just above the detection limit of 0.1 mg up to 5.8 mg. HF was found 

in only five of the twelve B series samples ranging from 0.5 mg to 2.3 mg. HF was 

found in all of the A series samples with levels from 5.5 mg to 335 mg. 

Quality Control: 

No HCl or HF were detected in the blank. All of the samples were analyzed 

in duplicate. The ending calibration was in good agreement with the initial 

calibration. The spike recoveries ranged from 97 % to 100 %, which is well within 

the normal range of 75 % to 125 %. The results for the audit samples are shown on 

the calculation worksheet. 

2of22 
First Analytical Laboratories Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

' 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517 www.firstanalytioaltabs.com 

ANALYSIS REPORT 

, Project #: 80704 Report Date: 1 1-Ju1-08 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc, Date Received: 08-Ju1-08 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Total Milligrams in Sample 

Sample HCI HF 

mg mg 

080609A-BL-M26A < 0.8 < 0.8 

080609B-1-KO < 0.3 1.7 

080609B-1-IMP1 < 0.4 0.5 

080609B-1-IMP2 < 0.3 < 0.3 

080609B-1-IMP3 < 0.2 < 0.2 

080609B-2-KO < 0.5 2.1 

080609B-2-IMP1 < 0.4 < 0.4 

080609B-2-IMP2 < 0.3 < 0.3 

080609B-2-IMP3 < 0.1 < 0.1 

080609B-3-KO < 0.4 2.3 

080609B-3-IMP1 0.7 0.7 

080609B-3-IMP2 0.4 < 0.4 

080609B-3-IMP3 < 0.1 < 0.1 

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

Spike, % Recovery 100% 98% 

3 of 22 
l 1 • Tou 

Project #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Ju1-08 

' Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Date Received: 08-1u1-08 

Client Project ID: 080609 

Total Milligrams in Sample 

Sample HCI HF 

mg mg 

080609A-1-KO 5.8 303 

080609A-1- IMP 1 0.4 26.2 

080609A-1-IMP2 < 0.3 12.4 

080609A-1-IMP3 0.1 10.6 

080609A-2-KO 3.5 226 

080609A-2-IMPI < 0.5 34.2 

080609A-2-IMP2 < 0.4 10.8 

080609A-2-IMP3 C 0.1 5.5 

080609A-3-KO 5.6 335 

080609A-3-IMP1 < 0.3 27.2 

080609A-3-IMP2 < 0.3 10.1 

080609A-3-IMP3 < 0.1 7.4 

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

Spike, % Recovery 98% 97% 

Spike, % Recovery 99% 100% 

4 of 22 
CHLORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

' Date: 10-Ju1-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HCI 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-BL-M26A 80704.6 0.02 408 0.37 20 < 0.82 

080609B-1-KO 80704.B10 0.06 157 0.87 20 < 0.31 

080609B-1-IMPI 80704.611 0.02 210 0.22 20 < 0.42 

0806096-1-IMP2 80704.612 0.01 164 0.07 20 < 0.33 

' 080609B-1-IMP3 80704313 0.00 80 0.00 20 < 0.16 

080609B-2-KO 80704.620 0.05 229 0.76 20 < 0.46 

0806096-2-IMPI 80704.621 0.02 214 0.34 20 < 0.43 

080609B-2-IMP2 80704.12122 0.05 170 0.76 20 < 0.34 

080609B-2-IMP3 80704.B23 0.03 55 0.42 20 < 0.11 

080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.05 204 0.77 20 < 0.41 

080609B-3-IMPI 80704.631 0.15 232 2.22 20 0.71 

080609B-3-IMP2 80704.1332 0.12 182 1.73 20 0.43 

080609B-3-IMP3 80704.B33 0.08 72 1.18 20 < 0.14 

080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 0.19 303 2.80 100 5.81 

080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 0.12 158 1.77 20 0.38 

080609A-1-IMP2 80704.Al2 0.06 170 0.86 20 < 0.34 

Spike 80704.B10S 2.99 157 43.68 % Rec. = 99.6% 

Spike 80704.Al2S 2.95 170 43.13 % Rec. = 98.4% 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Conc. 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg/L 

mg/L ml of CI 

Audits 

M26A-3756-03 8070412728 9.61 500 140.35 40 7.47 

M26A-3756-04 8070412752 9.60 500 140.28 40 7.47 

5of22 
CHLARIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

Proj. #: 80704 

Date: 10-JuI-08 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 15.73 1.0 14.61 

Standard 2 43.31 10 43.83 

Standard 3 84.30 6.0 87.66 

Standard 4 145.13 10.0 146.10 

Standard 5 218.00 15.0 219.16 

Standard 6 294.60 20.0 292.21 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99971 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 1.863 X Variable 14.61 

Observations 7 

6 of 22 
FLUORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L 

' Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 10-Ju1-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HF 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-BL-M26A 80704.B 0.00 408 0.00 20 < 0.82 

080609B-1-KO 80704.610 0.53 157 12.54 20 1.67 

08060911-1-IMPI 80704.1311 0.12 210 2.84 20 0.51 

0806096-1-IMP2 80704.B12 0.00 164 0.00 20 < 0.33 

08060913-1-IMP3 80704.1313 0.00 80 0.00 20 < 0.16 

080609B-2-KO 80704.1320 0.46 229 10.70 20 2.08 

080609B-2-IMP1 80704.621 0.08 214 1.84 20 < 0.43 

080609B-2-IMP2 80704.622 0.00 170 0.00 20 < 0.34 

080609B-2-IMP3 80704.1323 0.00 55 0.00 20 < 0.11 

080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.56 204 13.11 20 2.27 

080609B-3-IMP1 80704.631 0.15 232 145 20 0.68 

080609B-3-IMP2 80704.632 0.08 182 1.78 20 < 0.36 

080609B-3-IMP3 80704.1333 0.05 72 1.19 20 < 0.14 

080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 10.00 303 235.10 100 302.9 

080609A-1-IMPI 80704.A11 8.30 158 195.16 20 26.23 

080609A-1-IMP2 80704.Al2 3.66 170 86.03 20 12.44 

Spike 80704.B10S 3.47 157 81.66 %Rec. = 98.0% 

Spike 80704.Al2S 6.56 170 154.22 % Rec. = 96.7% 

7of22 
FLUARIDE 

IC ANALYSI8 RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

Proj. #: 80704 

Date: 10-Ju1-08 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 23.55 1.0 23.51 

Standard 2 69.08 3.0 70.54 

Standard 3 137.30 6.0 141.09 

Standard 4 242.22 10.0 235.15 

Standard 5 351.53 15.0 352.72 

Standard 6 469.01 20.0 470.30 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99963 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 3.407 X Variable 23.51 

Observations 7 

8of22 
CHLORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 11-Ju1-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HCI 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 0.13 29 1.92 20 0.08 

080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 0.15 234 2.18 100 3.51 

080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 0.05 253 0.78 20 < 0.51 

080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 0.04 174 0.65 20 < 0.35 

080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 0.06 66 0.89 20 < 0.13 

080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 0.21 266 3.08 100 5.63 

080609A-3-IMPI 80704.A31 0.06 162 0.87 20 < 0.32 

080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 0.04 165 0.58 20 < 0.33 

080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 0.08 72 1.20 20 < 0.14 

Spike 80704.A21 S 2.97 157 43.21 % Rec. = 99.0% 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 15.81 1.0 14.55 

Standard 2 43.43 3.0 43.64 

Standard 3 84.10 6.0 87.28 

Standard 4 144.36 10.0 145.46 

Standard 5 217.14 15.0 218.19 

Standard 6 293.18 20.0 290.92 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99973 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 1.786 X Variable 14.55 

Observations 7 

9 of 22 
FLUORIDE 

IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET 

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L 

Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L 

Date: 11-1u1-08 

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total 

Client FAL SoI'n Volume Area Factor mg 

mg/L ml as HF 

ACID IMPINGERS 

080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 18.28 29 352.86 20 10.60 

080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 9.66 234 186.40 100 226.0 

080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 6.76 253 130.41 20 34.19 

080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 3.11 174 60.00 20 10.82 

080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 4.17 66 80.53 20 5.51 

080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 12.61 266 243.36 100 335.4 

080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 8.38 162 161.84 20 27.17 

080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 3.07 165 59.29 20 1014 

080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 5.14 72 99.28 20 7.41 

Spike 80704.A21 S 9.76 157 188.33 % Rec. = 100.0% 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression 

Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 

Standard 1 20.93 1.0 19.30 

Standard 2 59.09 3.0 57.91 

Standard 3 113.46 6.0 115.81 

Standard 4 196.66 10.0 193.02 

Standard 5 287.07 15.0 289.54 

Standard 6 386.53 20.0 386.05 

Regression Statistics 

R Square 0.99977 Intercept 0 

Standard Error 2.203 X Variable 19.30 

Observations 7 

10 of 22 
First Analytical Laboratories 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. 

Chapef Hill, NC 27514 

Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

-80704 Air Compliance Testing Project #: 080609 

Date Shipped: 717/2008 

PO# 423 ~ 

Shipper: UPS 

Airbill #: 

Page: 1 of 2 

Chain of Custodv Record 

Sam le # Run # Contnr. # Matrix" Comments 

Sam les s lit to: 

080609B -1- M26A/KO 1 3 ^50 ml 0.1 N H2SO41 107 ml H20 Sam les were rro Vht priM to sh' ment 

080609B -1- M26A/IMP1 1 3 '100 ml 0.1 N 1-12SO41 110 mi H20 

080609B -1- M26A/IMP2 1 3 '100 ml O.iN H2SO4 / 64 ml H20 The contents of each im in er were recovered 

080609B - 1 - M26A/IMP3 1 3 80 mi H20 separately and should be anal zed and re ortetl se aratel . 

080609B -2- M26A/K0 2 3 '50 m10.1 N H2SO41179 ml H20 

080609B -2- M26A/IMP1 2 3 •100 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 114 ml H20 

080609B -2- M26A/IMP2 2 3 '100 ml 0.1N H2SO41 70 ml H20 

080609B -2- M26A/IMP3 2 3 55 ml H20 

080609B -3- M26A/KO 3 3 '50 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 154 ml H20 

080609B-3• M26A/IMP1 3 3 '100 m10.1N H2SO4 / 132 ml H20 

080609B -3- M26A/IMP2 3 3 '100 mi 0.1N H2SO4182 ml H20 

080609B -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 mi H20 

' Re resents total sample volume Anal ze ail sam Ies for HCI and HF 

as per section 11.1 

EPA Method 26A 

Notes: If questions contact: 

Relin uished e: Date: Rob Lisv 216.625.0900 x 232 

Received e: Date: e ZOOA Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235 

Job Numbec 

Air Compfiance Testing, Inc. 11 of 22 Date: 

(Method 26A.>us-First Analytical Labs BHt ) 7012008 Checked By: 
First Analytical Laboratories - 8 0 70 4 

1126 Burning Tree Dr. 

Chapel Hill, NC 27514 

Tel. (919) 942-8607 

FAX (919) 929-8688 

Chain of Custody Record 

Air Compliance Testing Project #: 080609 

Date Shipped: 7/7/2008 _ 

PO# _ 423 _ 

Shipper: UPS ~ 

Airbill #: 

Page: 2 of 2 

Sam le # Run # Contnr. # Matrix' Comments 

Sam les s lit to: 

080609A -1- M26A/K0 1 3 '50 ml 0.1 N H2SO4 / 253 ml H20 Sam les were not s Ilt prior to shi ment 

080609A-1- M26A/IMP1 1 3 •100 m10.1N H2SO4158 ml H20 

080609A -1- M26A/IMP2 1 3 900 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 70 ml H20 The contents of each im in er were recovered 

080609A -1 - M26A/IMP3 1 3 29 mi H20 separately and should be anal zed and re orted se aratel . 

080609A -2- M26A/K0 2 3 '50 ml 0.1 N H2504 1184 mI H20 

080609A -2- M26A/IMP1 2 3 '100 m10.1N H2SO4 / 153 mi H20 

080609A -2- M26A/IMP2 2 3 '100 ml O.1N H2SO4 / 74 ml H20 

080609A -2- M26AlIMP3 2 3 66 ml H20 

080609A -3- M26A/K0 3 3 '50 ml O.iN H2SO4 / 216 ml H20 

080609A -3- M26A/1MP1 3 3 '100 ml o.1N H2SO4 / 62 ml H20 

080609A-3-M26AlIMP2 3 3 '100 m10.1NH2SO4165mIH20 

080609A -3- M26A/IMP3 3 3 72 ml H20 

080609A-BL- M26A Biank 6 '200 m10.1N H2SO4/208mIH20 

'Representstotalsamplevolume Anal zeallsam lesfor HCI and HF 

as per section 11.1 

EPA Method 26A 

Notes: If questions contact: 

Relin uished B: Date: Rob Lisy 216.525.0900 x 232 

Received B: . Date: Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235 

Air Compliance Tesfing, lnc. 12 of 22 

(Method 26A.zls-first Malyticel Labs BH1) 7r7/2008 

Jpb Number: 

Date: 

Checked By: 
Method 26A Sample i2ecord of Gustody 6H1 

ugm 

ShippingRransporta4on Container Number: 

Seal I.D. No. u8 ag kre Date Ttme Reason for Brealdng Seai Final Vol. mi 

+(,() 

200 ml 0.1 N 

H2SOa / 

B _„ ml H20 

080609B -1 - , 

5 

B 

0806096 - 2- M28AIB#T( 

r-O 

S ~ ~' 

200 m10.1 N 

H2soa / 

B mi H20 

S 

B 

0806096 - 3 - M26Al,9tif 

K,(f 

S L ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 H2SO4 1/ N

B __-_mIH2O 

s 

B 

080609B - 4- M26PJBH7 S 

200 m10.1N 

H2SOa t 

B ml H20 

s 

B 

080609B - BL - M26A/BHt S 

200 mf O.1N 

H2SO4 / 

B __ ml H20 

S 

B 

S 

B 

S 

B 

S 

B 

' Were all seals intact?_,,,_Yes ^No (Desoribe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were ali liquid levels at marked leveis? Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

AirCompllance Testing, trtc. 

(Method 2eA.zls-Sampl¢ Record of Custody 8H7) 7l712008 

Job Number: ~

re,,~(e~e 13 of 22 Done By / Date: 7

Final Check By I Date: ~! 7 
Method M26A Custody 

-80704 

~ 

ShippingRransportation Container Number: 

I~• • , ,,r1,1' ~/~~ ~t~~y~~~ 

- . . . -. . ~~ 

,:,!,.. I ~ • 

.:,.,.: 

d 

,:,.,•: ns!%~~ir7~~ 

,8+.,:. 1 - M26A/IMP3 

,:,.,.: , ,.. • ~ ~ ~~~~:~ l /~ ~'' ''IJ7~~1,~~ M~ 

~°r AiG~'~~~ I// •L~i[/~~T~iy~'!,iT~.iJ®.~ 

,:,.,.: 

~ . . - 

/ ♦ 

!l ~~li'~~/~~ 

~ .,.,,. 

,;

~~ 

, : , .+•: e.'!~~.~,r.~~~~~~~ 

r' ~~~.~~ A~ ~©~~ 

' ,:,.,.! I ~ . 

+ ~~!-'

~N

'+s:. 

~ ~i~rraf! `

. 11 /k'~~~~~~.. 

,:,.+:: , 

1

~ 

+:,.,•: 

~i'~I%~i.+~~~.7i + • 

C! 

d,.>,~•~ ~~ 

i 

,',.,•': 3 M26A/IMP3+ 

,i,., • i : .A 

Were ali seals intact?`Yes _No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were ail liquid leveis at marked levels?_Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compliance resting, Inc. 

(Method CTMO27 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xis-Custatly) 7/212008 

Job Number: 

14 of 22 Date: 

Checked By: 
Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

-80704 

Shipping/Transportation Container Number: 

Seai I.D. No. Fuli Si na e Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 

080609A-1 - M26A/814'~- 

S . 

2H2SO4 /N 

g ml H20 

S 

B 

080609A - 2- M26A~ ~ r 

200 ml 0.1 N 

H2so4 

~ _ ml H20 

rB 

080609A - 3- M26A/Jj4N ~ 

7 d ~ ~ x ~ ~ 2 H2msoa iN 

 _ mt H20 

S 

B 

080609A - 4- M26A/BH4 S 

200 ml 0.1N 

 H2SO4 i 

B mi H20 

S 

B 

080609A - BL - M26A/BH1 S 

200 ttd 0.1N 

H2804 i 

B _ ml H20 

s 

B 

S 

B 

s 

B 

S 

B 

Were all seals intact?_Yes ____,No (Describe seai and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were all Iiquid levels at marked levels? Yes No (Estlmate loss in the "Remarks") 

Received By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Air Compiiance Testing, Inc. 

(Method 26A.xts-,Sample RacoTd of Custotly aH1) 7r7/2008 

Job Number: 

15 of 22 Done By / Date: ~/ ~~ 

Final Check By / Date: dfr 
Method M26A Custody 

-8d70 4 

.------ 

ShippingrTransportation Container Number: 

i~~_ ~~~~~~®~'' 

~.I~~.. II . 

~f~4~•~~_~~~ii~}y~`ri.y,~/'l~: ~~yr~ ~i~ 

• ~ l~/il/~~' i~'/ .~r4~111/:~t~~';L~J ~ 

I 

©'~~~ll_~~~A~i~~t 

0:0609,A • 

~ r:~~~►~~~~~ 

,:,.,:. M... ) . 

e►;~~~~~,_,:•.~■~~~ ~~ 

,:..,.. . ©r~.~r.~s~.~~~/~►!.~® t:'r~®~~'' 

~ A®_ 

1:1609• ~2 6AAMP1~~~~~u

~~~~ ~/ ~~~®~~'.. 

~~

I:~CIr' I1•. 

~~/ 

.:,.r•, ►~iiri~~~~y~n.; . . 

~ 

,:r.,.. !:.. ~i 

r:~~r~a+►~;. -?:~~~~,~,n~® 

1•0611. 3

. 

,:r.,.A , / ;2 

,:,.,;A( M26AIIMP3 

, , ; • . : L 

Were al/ seals intact?_Yes _No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") 

Were all liquid levels at marked levels?—Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") 

Reoeived By Sample Custodian 

(Full Signature) (Date) 

Remarks: 

Job Number: 

Air Compliance Testfng, inc. 16 Gf 22 Date: 

(Melhotl CTMO27 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xIaCustotly) 712/2008 Checked By: G-J~' 
' OF 1 NC 275 4-07 

-,",", ~' GIIkBl91111 

: • ., 

TATE STRICKLER 

(216) 525•0900 235 

AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 

5525 CANAL RD 

CLEVEl.AND OH 44125 

SHIP TO: 

MIKE BARRY 

(919)942-8607 

FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 

11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

UPS NEXT DAY AIR ~ 

TRACKING #: 1Z FR8 740 014083 7262 

BILLING: P!P 

N5 ,UD..> CeimnN,NDi8.0A Wi'ltl8 

Fokl here amf phice in labet poucfi 

17 of 22 
FROM: 

TATE STRICKLER 

(216) 525-0900 235 

AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 

5525 CANAL RD 

CLEVELAND OH44125 

__..__._....__.___._..__..___ _.. 

12 LBS 1 OF 1 

-8070 4 

SHIP TO: 

MIKE BARRY 

(919) 942-8607 

FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 

11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

'°' • i N t: 275 4-01 

•O • . • II~~IIIIIII~ III~ IIIII~ . ~~.~. 

UPS NEXT DAY AIR ~ 

TRACKING #: 1Z FR8 740 014024 5053 

pl IIIIII ~~IRIII ~ IIIIIII 

mr ~xmrt~F:i,::rr: 

FoW here and place in Sabet pouch 

18 of 22 
~ 

June 17, 2008 

Requestor: Bryon Richwine 

PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

2575 Interstate Drive 

Harrisburg, PA 17101 

717-346-8252 

Dear Bryon Richwine: 

Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with 

two ampules of the following audit materials for a Method 26A HCI audit; Numbers M26A3756-03 and -04. These audit samples are for an uncoming audit at Gien-Gery Corp., Hanley 

Plant in Summerville, PA and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner of Glen-Gery Corp., 

Hanley Plant in Summerville, PA per your automated database request. 

Please note: requests for Method 26A are now filled separately from requests for Method 

26 and that there are NEW Instructions associated with these samples, effective October 2003. 

Method 26A 

request M26A-3756-03: 

- one Method 26A HCl sample; Sample No. L- 2728 

request M26A-3756-04: 

- one Method 26A HCl sample; Sample No. L- 2752 

Please note that each sample is individually labeled and shipped with an instruction sheet 

with the format for reporting the laboratory audit results. All results are to be reported to the 

internet automated computerized database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit samples along with the 

designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample 

according to the speci$cations of the Test Method and using the supplied instruetions. The audit 

results are to be reported to you, the reguestor, by the analyst, using the Reporting Form, in the 

units specified in the instructions. You then will use the automated database to enter the results 

into the SSAP database. 

We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit 

Program. if you have any questions regarding the samples, please contact either Thomas 

Mekenzie at (919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. 

Sineerely, 

Rick Lafleur 

CC: sent with samples 

601 Keystone Pa.rk prive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 27560° Phone (919) 468-7800 ° Fax (919) 468-7803 

° Arlingfon,VA ° Atlanta, GA ° Austin,TX ° Boston, MA • Chantilly,VA ° Cincinnati, OH ° Hershey, PA 

Kansas City, KS ° Lexington, MA ° Nashua, NH ° Research Triangle Park, Moi- i-isville, NC ° Sacramento, CA 

Eqval OpPnnunity EmplOycr • Prirried on fte<y<lad Peper 
-80704 

FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS 

OF METHOD 26A AUDIT SOLUTION 

es This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous sam 

rred to as the aeid sample or hydrogen hatidtr_s fra 'on. There is no filter included w 

audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No. 4 alkaline sample 

ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that 

~d with a low concentration of chloride. 

) Wrap a paper towel around the ampule, and with the anipule in the upright position, break of: 

op at the pre-scored mark by carefally exerting pressure sideways. 

;) Pipette exactly 10 mL ofthe audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL volumetric flask. Di 

:xactly to the 500 mL mark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 

1) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 11.1 of Method ~ 

lYote: The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within 

alibration range ofthe analytical instrament. This decision is left to the analyst.) 

1) Calculate the concentration ofchloride in the Diluted Saniple in mg/L 

the chloride concentration in the Di luted Sampleon the enclosed Reporting Form 

Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting 

Revised 10103 

19 of 22 
-60704 

Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be compieted by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-03/L2728 Date Issued: 06/17/08 

Auditee: 

Company: 

Address: I( 2(0 ~u~rlirlR '(ree U~ • CHr~i~E~ h{lu .275t7 

Attention of: Phone: ,1I f 1 1+Z 8607 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept, of Environmentai Protection, Bureau of Air Quaitiy 

Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Project Name: Gien-Gery Corp., Hanley Pfant 

Audit Results (Resutts In mg/L) 

Analyte Result 

Chloride concentration 7.47 

~ 

Revised 10/03 

20 of 22 
-6 07p4 

FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS 

OF METHOD 26A AUDIT SOLUTION 

t; This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous saml 

m-ed to as the acid sample or 6ydfogen halicle~ fract~. T3 ere is no 61ter included wi 

audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No. 4 aZkal'~e sample 

arnpule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that 

-d with a low concentration of chloride. 

1) Wrapa paper towel around the ampule, and with the ampule in the upright position, break of 

op at the pre-scored mark by carefully exerting pressure sideways. 

>_) Pipette exactly 10 mL ofthe audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL vo lumetric flask. D 

;xactly to the 500 mL mark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Samp le.) 

3)Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 1 l.l of Method : 

,l_V2tr. The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within 

;alibration range ofthe analytical instrument. This decision is left to the analyst.) 

4)Calculate the concentration ofchloride in the Diluted Sample in rng/L. 

i) Record the chloride concentration in the Diluted Sample on the enclosed Reporting Form in t 

)f mg/L. 

5)Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting Fc 

o the designated agent. 

Revised 10103 

21 of 22 
.80704 

Method 26A Audit Material 

(CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-04/t.2752 Date Issued: 06/17/08 

Auditee: 

Company: FI f S4 R n a W i ca lt-a h s 

Address: 1 t` 26 Da f n t ✓t 9, "rr ez U F 60ft-` L- III2 7 L 

Attention of: 9• (0a d1 1 Vt Phone: 919 14 2- N 0 -] 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept, of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of:.- Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

Proje¢t Nante: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results in mg/L) 

Analyte Result 

Chloride concentration 7. 'I / 

09-'`t l o g 

4"" 

Revised 10103 

22 of 22 
~ 

w w w. e r g. c o m 

June 17, 2008 

IYequestor: Bryon Rictrwine 

PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

2575 Interstate Drive 

Harrisburg, PA 17101 

717-346-8252 

Dear Bryon Richwine: 

Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with 

ampules of audit rnaterials for a Method 08 audit pair; Audit Numbers M08-3756-01a and - 

Olb. These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant in 

Summerville, PA and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner of Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley 

Plant in Summerville, PA per your automated database request. 

Method 08 Sulfur Dioxide: 

request M08-3756-01a: 

- one each Sulfuric Dioxide audit sample; Sample No. G- 0523 

Method 08 Sulfuric Acid Mist: 

request M08-3756-01b: 

- one each Sulfuric aeid mist audit sample; Sample No. H- 0895 

Please note that each sample is shipped with an instruction sheet and a data form for 

listing the analytical audit information. All results are to be reported by the requestor to the 

internet automated eomputerized database. 

You are urged to instruct the laboratory to ana1yze the audit sample along with the 

designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample 

according to the specifications of the Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit 

results are to be reported to vou, the reguestor in the units specified in the instructions. You then 

wiii use the automated database to enter the results into the SSAP database. 

We woUld like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit 

Program. If you have any questions concerning the audit, please contact either Thomas Mckenzie 

(919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. 

Sincerely, 

T--/-'—. 

Rick Lafleur 

CC: sent with audit samples 

601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 27560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919).468-7803 

• Arlington,VA • Atlanta, GA • Austin,TX • Boston, MA • Chantilly,VA ° Cincinnati, OH • Hershey, PA 

Kansas City, KS • L.exington, MA • Nashua, NH • Research Triangle Park, Mori-isville, NC • Sacraroento, CA 

Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper 
Method 8 Audit Material 

(Sulfuric acid mist Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

' REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01b/H0895 Date Issued: 06117/08 

Auditee: 

Company 

Address: ,L'} ~'~ro7( „zD-j7a yiv,:.,.oY~y 

Attention of: Phone: 9/,-,52-5-- r',lpC? 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 u 

Project NafTle: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Piant 

Audit Results (Results in mg H2SO4/ dscm) 

Analyte Result 

Sulfuric acid mist ;e ) • ~- 

Revised 8121/02 
Method 8 Audit Material 

(Sulfur Dioxide Spiked Aqueous Solution) 

REPORTING FORM: To be compieted by Iaboratory 

Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01 alG0523 Date Issued: 06/17/08 

Auditee: 

Company w9 ~rrryj~~x nva Tn,l%7 ~~~ ~vre 

Address: 40 A,!Ol ° 9- ~ 

Attention of: 7 rz~,r:7 Phone: ~~s~ _ plp g 

Requestor: 

Agency: PA Dept. of Environmentai Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone:717-346-8252 

Project Nanle:Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant 

Audit Results (Results in mg S02/ dscm) 

Analyte Result 

Sulfur Dioxide ,3q3`~.--• 

Revisetl 8121102 
ti 

c 

oi C « 

~ 

N U C 

~ 

4 

E O 

U 

~ 

Q 

~~ ~ ° °) ao ~ ~ M 00 O O 00 M 

O O O 6 O ~ O N O p ~ M Y'7 O O p N `- ~ O M N O ~ p.- O 

E E E E E E E EE E E E 

N "O 

~ E m E E E ~ E m E E E 

O W~0~ c O 

0)CNO ~ c OO O (nN OO O ~ O 

N 

O

~ 

S(n N v O O Cn ~ N 

i N= p N 

02 .-. ~

• G N ~7 ~ O~ •-.._ C 

~ +-' U V "`' ~ ~ ""' U 

V' "' N ~ ~ O 

V 

O ~ ~ U -O O 

O o w mg N U 

c0N N CO ~ m O 0 •CO -X 

m~ ~ m fl. Q 

v 

c c U ~ a 

~ E 

O 

c E 

m~ C? (.j 

m m ,~ m c•O) v~i 0 

U) 

N ^ O N C,4 0 

~ 

= 

~ ~o ~ ~ 0 O ~ ~ ~ o p ° _= 00200 o o 0-m> E E o-m> E E En °s o 0 E 11 0 ~ jj ~ > > @u 

s ~ p n o ~ > O O t6 

1-> 

tl! 

11 'a+ ~ > 

!O C 

~ > c ~ O > a 

Z ~ Z O ~ C V = 

u o z ~ 

z v 

d 

c 

C 

O O V 

~ _ = O N y 

a H 

~ 

~ 

W 

I.- 

H J M 

tLl 

~ 

0 

W ~.1 Fa- W 

0 

O 

N 

a 

~ 

m 

0 

H 
Number of Test Runs 3 

Traverse Points F 12 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

__41.80 

._..-_~ 

41.

.

80 

. .. 

41.80 

41.70 

0.84 

41-70 

_ 0.84 

41.70 

 0.84 

28.90 28.80 28.83 

20.00 20.00 _ _ 20.00'.~ 26.00 _ 28.00 28.00'.. 

_ 681.395 742.563i804.668'', 

741.830 _ 804.344 866.270'. 

0.9988 ~ 0.9988 0.9988''. 

_ 2.016 

90 

2.016 

--- yp 

2.016''. 

°---- 90-. 

106.5 103.5 _ 107.2 

12.21 13.9 12.4 

1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 

17.00 

82.00i_ 

16.50 

82.50 

~ 16.83 

82.17 

Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

uncontrolled 

InletDUCt 

Av~ 

41.80 

41.70 

0.84 

28.84 

20.00 

28.00 

0.9988 

2.016 

90 

105.7 

12.8 

1.00 

16.78 

82.22 

Comol'anoe Stack E'ss'on Teet Report 

TEST DATA 

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in) 

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in) 

Pitot Tube Coeffcient (Cp) 

Barometric Pressureat Ground Level (Pbar) (in Hg) 

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) 

Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) 

Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 

Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@) 

Total Sampling Run Tlme (Thela) (min) 

Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) 

Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) 

Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%CO2) 

Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%02) 

Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N2) 

Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 -- 2.2 

Port Number 

Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 15:45 ~ 19:48 

Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) _ _14:19 18:53 21:33 

DETAILED RESULTS 

Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 9.507 9.507 9.507 9.507 

Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 28.87 28.77 28.80 28.82 

Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (Ib/Ib-mole) 28.84 28.82 28.83 28.83 

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (Ib/Ib-mole) 27.85 27.85 27.85 27.85 

Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 28.86 28.76 28.79 28.80 

 Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H20) -011 -0.19 -0.18 -0.16 

Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 373.8 377.4 376.2 375.8 

Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 833.8 837.4 836.2 835.8 

Average Stack Gas Velocily (Vs) (fUsec) 53.89 53.44 53.73 53.68 

Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 3,233 3,206 3,224 3,221 

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 30,739 30,481 30,647 30,622 

Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Condilions (scfm) 18,779 18,472 18,620 18,624 

Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 17,064 16,814 16,933 16,937 

Percent by Volume Moisture as measuretl in Stack Gas (%H20) 9.13 8.98 9.06 9.06 

Test Results 

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Slandard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 56.142 

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.619 0.624 0.629 0.624 

Predicted 1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 37.125 37.421 37.738 37.428 

Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.909 0.910 0.909 0.909 

Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H20) 0.5442 0.5317 0.5383 0.5381 

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.7369 0.7277 0.7326 0.7324 

Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H20) 1.4733 1.5792 1.6333 1.5619 

Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 94,500 100.583 94.917 96.667 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 554.500 560.583 554.917 556.667 

Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 60.435 61.781 61.602 61.273 

Posl-Test Calibralion (Yqa) 0.9969 1.0171 1.0313 1.0151 

Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.19 -1.83 -3.25 -1.63 

SAMPLING QA 

Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (tlscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 

Currenl Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK 

Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) -- 0.253L 0.252 0.253 0.253 

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% 1) 98.7 101.8 101.1 100.6 

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD 

Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H20 0 0 0 0 

Sensilivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005 

Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) 7 YES YES YES 

Test Date: 6124/2006 - 6125/2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
Point 

Count 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

Run # 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS Inlet Duct 

Run Pitot Delta 

Time P (in 

Square 

Root of 

Delta P 

0.787 

0.800 

0.762 

0.735 

0.714 

0.693 

0.748 

0.755 

0.714 

0.742 

0.714 

0.678 

0.678 

0.775 

0.806 

0.728 

0.700 

0.686 

0.707 

0.806 

0.742 

0.721 

0.728 

0.656 

0.762 

0.781 

0.728 

0.700 

0.693 

0.700 

0.742 

0.775 

0.755 

0.794 

0.700 

0.663 

Orifice DGM Stack 

Delta H Temp Pressure Stack 

(in H20) OUT (°F) (in H20) Temp (°F) 

1.67 ~ 89 -0.12 1 - 375 

1.73 91 -0.12 369 

1.57 93 -0.12 375 

1.46 

1.38 

94 

94 

-0.1 

-0.1 

366 

373 

1.3 95 -0.1 365 

1.51 94 -0.1 

~ 

379 

1.57 95 -0.16 374 

1.38 96 _-0.1 380 

1.49 

1.38 

97 

98 

4.11 

-0.14 

374 

381 

1.24 98 -0.1 374 

1.25 98 -0.29 376 

1.62 99 '-0.24 376 

1.77 

1.44 

101 

102 

-0.14 

-0.19 

372 

380 

1.33 103 -0.17 374 

1.36 103 -0.16 380 

i.61 98 -0.29 386 

2.08 100 -0.15 378 

1.76 100 -0.19 368 

1.66 _ 101 -0.18 379 

1.7 101 -0.18 384 

1.38 101 ~ -0.1 376 

J 1.6 95 -0331 , 349 

1.7 96 -0.23 379 

1.5 97 -0.24 385 

1.4 

~ 1.3 

97 

96 

JLL -0.17 

-0.14 

379 

~ 384 

1.4 96 -0.18 377 

1.7 

1.9 

93 

94 

- -0.17 

-0.16 

381 

375 

1.9 94 .0.141 381 

2.1 m 94 _._._._ 

 -0.12 ___. 352 

1.6 _..., 94 -0.11 

----__m , 

386 

1.5 93 386 

Test Date: 6/24/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609 
CJ 

W 

c 

~ 

(O , 

V (O O 

I

cmN 

W N O 

 <M OO O 

M tn W 7 ~ C V V' (O O 

~ O M O 

~ t n O O O 

O 

N V CD V ~ 

c O M (O O 

~ <t N O 

~ M O 66 

O 

~ r r 00 r 

C oJ M (O O 3 M N — O 

~ M O 66 O 

O O 

W O 

ti 

~ 

O1 Cq 

FN 

G 

U 

G 

~ 

Q 

~ 

U 

~ 

'q 

N G J C m V N o a Jp 

tll ~ c ro 

o c N 1 ' 0 

~ 0 ~ W C ro ro 

0 

co m a m 

aU @ ro 

ro ro (D 

LL. Q N .V 

N ~~ 

tL ~ N 

W Z (6 

N 

LL 

M 

ro 

m 

n. 

C Y" ~ U 

ro ~ 

o ~ 

a 

c ~ 

r ~ 

O ~ 

> ~ 

N ~ 

m ~ 

U U 

ro ro a a 

~ O O N 

N N 

~ 

W O 

N 

N 

~ 

N 

m 

~ 

N 

F 

N h 

V1 3 

W N 

~ d 

Q W C O 

N W E 

~ o W 
FF $0300 

0192 

23400 

0,150 

_ 26600 

 0.212 

[ 0000. ) 0,000 1 0.000 

b.61 3.5t o.b'3 

HF Volume of Imoinper 1 Sample (VsHF) (mi) _ 3160 _ 5060 _ 3240 3820.000 

HF Concentration of Sample, (S)(-)(mg F/ L) 8.300 ~ ~6,757 ~ 8.385 7,814 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX )(mg F/ L) ! __ _

0,000 

- 

 _0,000 

- 

 _0.000,J 0.000 

HF Mass in Impinger 1 sample, (mHF) (mg) 26.23 34.19 27.17 

HF Mass in Impinger 2 sample, (mHF) (mg) 12.44 10.82 10.14 

HF Volume of impinoer 3 Sample (VsHF) (mi) 580.0 1320.0 1440.0 1113.3 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg F/ L) 18.28 _ 4.2 __ 5.1 9.2 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg F ! L) ~ _ 0_00_ _ 0.00 , ~- 0.00 0.00 

HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 10.60 5.51 7.41 7.84 

HCI Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 352.17 276.52 380.14 

HCI Collection Efficiency (%) 96.99 98.01 98.05 

HF Concentralion, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 223.33 173.97 237.15 211.48 

HF Concentration (pprrNd) D ry @ 68F 268.516 209,166 285.132 254,271 

HF Concentralion (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 243.994 190.390 259.300 231.228 

Stack Gas Concentration 

HF Volume of ImninOer 2 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 3400 3480 3300 3393.333 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg F/ L) 3.281 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX )(mg F/ L) 0.000 

3.660 3.110 __ 3_072 

0.000m 0.000 ~ 0.000 

Glen Gery 

Ceric Kiln 

Uncontrolled 

Inlot Ducl 

Average 

0.233 

13,425 

Averege 

26766,667 

0.185 

0.000 

Compliance Stack Emission Test R pon 

TEST DATA 

DETAILED RESULTS 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Emission Results: 

Hytlrogen Chloride (HCI) Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 0.268 0,178 0,255 

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 14.275 10.957 15.042 

LAB RESULTS HCL 

Samule antl Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

HCI Volume of Knock Out Sample (VsHCI) (ml) 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI / L) 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg CI / L) 

HCI Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

HCI Volume of Impinoer 1 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI / L) 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX-) (mg CI / L) 

HCI Mass in Impinger 1 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

HCI Volume of imoinaer 2 Sample (VsHCI) (mi) 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI ! L) 

HCI Concentration of Blank (BX) (mg CI ! L) 

HCI Mass in impinger 2 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

3160 5060 3240 

0.100 0.100 

0.000 0.000 0.000 

0.38 0.51 0.32 

3400T 3480 3300 

0.100 0.100 0.100 

0,000 u 0.000 0.000 

0.34 0.35 0.33 

3820.000 

0.107 

0.000 

3393.333 

0.100 

0.000 

HCI Volume of Imoinoer 3 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) 

HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg CI / L) 

HCI Concentration of Blank (8)(-)(mg CI / L) 

HCI Mass in impinger 3 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

HCI Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 

HCI Coilection Efflciency ( % ) 

0.13 0.10 ~ 0.10 

0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.08 0.13 U.14 

6.60 4.50 6.43 

98.86 100.00 100.00 

1,577 1.589 1.603 

4.19 2.83 4.01 

2,762 1.866 2,647 

2.510 1.699 2.407 

Stack Gas Concentration 

Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 

HCI Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm) 

HCI Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 

HCI Concentralion (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 

1113.3 

0.1 

0.00 

0.12 

1,590 

3.68 

2,425 

2.205 

LAB RESULTS HF 

Samnle and Calculation Data 

HFVolume of Knock Out Sample (VsHF) (ml) 

HF Concentration of Sample, (SX 

HF Concentration of Blank (BX 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

30300 23400 26600 

9.997 9.658 12.610 

0.000 0.000 _ 0.000_~ 

Average 

26766.667 

0.755 

0.000 

HF Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHF) (mg) 302.90 - ~ - 226.00 335,43 

Tesl Date: 6124/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, /nc. - 080609 
Glen Gery 

Cedc Kiln 

Uncontrolletl 

Inlet Duct 

Compl'ance Stack Emission Test Reoort 

EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and 

Sample Calculations 

Run No. - 1 

Constants 

CO2Fm= 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NOzF„.t= 46.01 HCIF„1= 36.46 

OzFm= 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COF„i= 28.01 SOzF,.,t= 64.06 

CONzF,= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu HiSOaF,W= 98,08 HF F,x= 20.01 

HBOF,= 18.0 CF,= 12.011 T„d= 528 Psld= 29.92 

Stack Variabies 

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coeffcient (dimenslonless) 

Pbar = 28.90 in. Hg barometric pressure 

Ecox = 20 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box 

E,am = 28 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampiing ports 

y= 0.9988 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensioniess) 

0= 90.0 min net run time (minutes) 

Vie = 118.7 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) 

%COz = 1.00 % percent COz by volume (dry basis) (dimensioniess) 

%Oz = 17.00 % percent Oz by volume (dry basis) (dimensioniess) 

%CO = 0.00 % percent CO by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) 

%Nz = 82.00 % percent Nz by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) 

A= 9.5069 fte stack cross-sectionalarea 

PB = -0.11 in. H20 flue gas static pressure 

T:.s = 833.75 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F) 

SQOPa, = 0.74 in. wg average square root oP 

AH = 1,47 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter 

Tm = 554.50 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) 

Va, = 60.44 ft' volume of inetered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) 

D„ = 0.253 in. sampling nozzie diameter 

Calculated Stack Variables 

Barometric pressure at sampling location 

NOTE: Baromotric pressure recorded et Broond level 

Paem = Pcar - [( Esam / 100 ft)' 0.1 in. Hg J 

Psa ,n = 28.90 - ( ( 28.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) 

Psem = 28.87 in. Hg 

Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf) 

Vmrd=y`Vm*[Pnar - ([(Eoo,/ 100 ft) *0 . 1 in.Hg]+( 4H/ 13. 6 ))/Pdd] * (Trid/Tm) 

Vmsla = 0.9988 * 60.435 * ( ( 28.90 - ( ( 20.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 1.4733 / 13.6) ) 129.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 554.500 ) 

Vmsta = 55.688 ft3 

Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf) 

Vwsta = ( 0.04715 ft'/g ) * Vlc 

Vwsta = ( 0.04715 * 118.7 ) 

Vwsm = 5.6 fta 

Test Date: 6/24/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 5 A(r Compllance Testlrtg, Inc. - 080609