alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed October 18, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00731-CV

____________

SURVEYING AND MAPPING, LLC, Appellant

V.

LE BLANC FARMS JOINT VENTURE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-DCV-237403

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 20, 2018. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On August 27, 2018, we ordered Elizabeth Wittu to file the record within 

15 days. We received no response. On September 27, 2018, we again ordered 

Elizabeth Wittu to file the record within 15 days. We stated that if the record was 

not filed, the court would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the 

reason for failure to file the record. The record has not been filed. 
The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the 240th District Court to conduct a hearing at which 

the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to 

determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when 

the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court 

reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record 

timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s 

record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law 

and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental 

clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court by November 19, 2018. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record 

before the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court 

need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown
### §3553. Membership in WTO of boycotting countries

It is the sense of the Congress that the Trade Representative should vigorously oppose the admission into the World Trade Organization of any country which, through its laws, regulations, official policies, or governmental practices, fosters, imposes, complies with, furthers, or supports any boycott described in section 4607(a) of title 50 (as in effect on August 20, 1994), including requiring or encouraging entities within that country to refuse to do business with persons who do not comply with requests to take any action prohibited under that section.

(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, §133, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4607(a) of title 50 (as in effect on August 20, 1994), referred to in text, means section 4607(a) of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to its repeal by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232.
#### Mary E. Reilley et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff-wife’s falling on snow and ice, the jury awarded a verdict to her and also to her husband in a companion action for loss of services. The defendant appeals, urging that the cause of action was barred by reason of the fact that it was not commenced within one year after it accrued, as required by subdivision c of section 394a-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appellant is precluded from setting up the above defense because of its failure to plead it in the answer or to move *1015to amend at the trial. *(Arnold*v. *Village of North Tarry town,*137 App. Div. 68, ail’d. 203 N. Y. 536; *Diohins*v. *City of New York,*228 App. Div. 853.) Present — Lewis, F. J., Carswell, A del, Sneed" and "Wenzel, JJ~. [See 274 App. ¡ Dwl 801.] . *I*
### Part A—Federal Administrative Provisions
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 10
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 157 Filed 03/14/22 Entered 03/14/22 10:04:37 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/
      Kenneth Bosket
                Kenneth
      Bosket
                CEO
                Dated:
      November 12,  2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for
purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Crown
Equity.





/s/
      Montse Zaman
                Montse
      Zaman
                CFO
                Dated:
      November  12, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Crown Equity  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1303

LEON WILSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF DORCHESTER; CITY OF SUMMERVILLE; ROY

E. WHITEHEAD, Chief of Police; E. WORSHAM,

Summerville Police; J. A. WOODS, South Carolina Department of Public Safety,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-95-746-18-AJ)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: January 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald,

STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina; Donna Seegars Givens,

BROWN & WOODS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leon Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v.

County of Dorchester, No. CA-95-746-18-AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 June 16, 2011  Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported)
 HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
  Delaware
    
    000-27577
    
    16-1538028(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identificationincorporation)
    
    
    
    Number)
 161 Sixth Avenue, New York, New York
    
    10013(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (212) 539-9600
 (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Section 5  Corporate Governance and Management
 Item 5.02  Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
     Section 9  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibits
 Exhibit 10.1
    
    Separation Agreement between the Company and Kimberly Till, effective June 16, 2011.Exhibit 10.2
    
    Separation Agreement between the Company and Pavan Bhalla, effective June 20, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.
(Registrant)By:
    /s/  Marc H. LevinName:
    Marc H. LevinTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Chief
Administrative Officer and General
Counsel




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 EXHIBIT NO.
    
    DESCRIPTIONExhibit 10.1
    
    Separation Agreement between the Company and Kimberly Till, effective June 16, 2011.Exhibit 10.2
    
    Separation Agreement between the Company and Pavan Bhalla, effective June 20, 2011.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chris L.
Koliopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                                       | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Dated:
 November 9, 2010                                              | 
| |                                                                       | 
| | /s/ Chris L.
 Koliopoulos                                             | 
| |                                                                       | 
| | Chris L.
 Koliopoulos                                                
| | Chairman,
 President, and Chief Executive Officer of Zygo Corporation

---
§ 19.185 Testing scale tanks for accuracy. ( a ) A proprietor who uses a scale tank for tax determination must ensure the accuracy of the scale through periodic testing. Testing of the scale must be conducted at least every 6 months and whenever the scale is adjusted or repaired.
( b ) A proprietor also must test, at least once a month, the gallonage represented to be in a scale tank against the gallonage indicated by volumetric determination of the contents of the tank. However, if the scale is not used during a month, it is only necessary to verify against the volumetric determination when the scale is next used. The proprietor must make the volumetric determination in accordance part 30 of this chapter. If the variation exceeds 0.5 percent of the quantity shown in the tank, the proprietor must take appropriate action to verify the accuracy of the scale.
( c ) If the appropriate TTB officer determines that a scale may be inaccurate, the proprietor must test the accuracy of the scale.
(26 U.S.C. 5006, 5204, 5505)
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-143652, 333-61876, 333-153228 and 333-160100) pertaining to the 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, and certain warrants of RadNet Inc., of our report dated May 10, 2010 with respect to the combined financial statements of certain RadNet, Inc. affiliates including MIB Partnership, LLP, Franklin Imaging Joint Venture, Carroll County Radiology, LLC and MRI at St. Joseph Medical Center, LLC, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Los Angeles, CaliforniaMay 10, 2010
Exhibit10.92

September 23, 2005

YouthStream AcquisitionCorp. c/o YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. 244 Madison Avenue,PMB #358 New York, New York 10016

Gentlemen:

KES Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany ("**KESH**") is the holder of thatcertain 8% subordinated secured promissory note issued byYouthStream Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation("**Company**") in the original principalamount of $19 million (the "**KESHNote**") and Atacama Capital Holdings, Ltd., a BritishVirgin Islands company ("**Atacama**,") isthe holder of that certain 8% subordinated secured promissorynote issued by the Company in the original principal amount of $21million (the "**Atacama** **Note**" andcollectively with the KESH Note, the"**Notes**"). The Notes were issuedpursuant to that certain Note Purchase Agreement dated February 25,2005 (the "NPA") and in conjunction with theacquisition by the Company of (i) a 37.45% membership interestin KES Acquisition Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company("**KESA**"), from KESH and (ii) all ofthe stock of Atacama KES Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation,from Atacama.

For good and valuable consideration, the receiptand sufficiency of which is hereby acknowleged, the parties heretoagree to the following modification to the NPA:

Section 9.6 ishereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

"Section 9.6    Covenants Regarding EarningsBefore Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization . For each ofthe fiscal years ending on and after September 30, 2006, theCompany must have, on a consolidated basis, in excess of SevenMillion Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($7,200,000) ofearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,calculated in accordance with GAAP("**EBITDA**"). At March 31 ofeach fiscal year following the year ended September 30, 2005in which the obligations under the Notes remain outstanding, theCompany must have, on a consolidated basis, in excess of ThreeMillion Dollars ($3,000,000) of EBITDA for thesix (6) months then ended."

[BALANCE OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

----

YouthStream Acquisition Corp.September23, 2005Page 2

Except as modified above, the NPA remains infull force and effect.

|  | **KES HOLDINGS,LLC** |
|--|----------------------|

|  | By: Libra/KES Investment I, LLC Its:Manager |
|--|---------------------------------------------|

|  | By: /s/ Jess M. Ravich |
|--|------------------------|

|  | Jess M. RavichAuthorized Signatory |
|--|------------------------------------|

ATACAMA CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LTD.

|  | By: /s/ Gwenyth Vanterpool Name:Gwenyth Vanterpool for Westlaw Limited Title:Director |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | Accepted and Agreed to as ofthe 23rd day of September 2005: |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | YOUTHSTREAMACQUISITION CORP. |
|--|------------------------------|

|  | By:  /s/ Robert N.Weingarten |
|--|-----------------------------------|

|  | Robert N. WeingartenChief Financial Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,671
<SECURITIES>                                    37,997
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,478
<INVENTORY>                                     24,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,945
<PP&E>                                          54,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 398,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,385
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   398,390
<SALES>                                        226,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,068
<CGS>                                           77,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                444
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       444
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Data listed for "EPS-PRIMARY" is the newly defined "BASIC EPS".
<F2>Data listed for "EPS-DILUTED" is the newly defined "DILUTED EPS".
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 434.18

 435.56

 437.20

 439.11

 440.73

 442.39

 443.76

 444.68

 445.07

 445.45

 446.76

 448.19

 449.81

 451.37

 452.93

 454.46

 455.99

 457.48

 458.30

 458.65

 458.97

 459.00

 459.04

 459.05

 459.42

 459.78

 460.15

 460.52

 461.26

 462.00

 462.46

 819,741

 832,693

 848,175

 866,327

 881,826

 897,802

 911,061

 920,001

 923,800

 927,506

 940,321

 954,378

 970,386

 985,885

 1,001,465

 1,016,825

 1,032,261

 1,047,368

 1,055,713

 1,059,281

 1,062,547

 1,062,853

 1,063,262

 1,063,364

 1,067,145

 1,070,829

 1,074,619

 1,078,413

 1,086,015

 1,093,634

 1,098,379

 6,148

 8,197

 8,179

 7,137

 7,452

 8,085

 8,086

 7,124

 4,187

 4,188

 4,242

 8,032

 6,878

 6,844

 6,818

 7,885

 7,855

 7,823

 7,795

 4,078

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,007

 3,982

 0

 0

 4,049

 4,027

 3,940

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 1, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2012 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 291,055 0 8,540 146,354

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 12,417

 12,952

 15,482

 18,152

 15,499

 15,976

 13,259

 8,940

 3,799

 3,706

 12,815

 14,057

 16,008

 15,499

 15,580

 15,360

 15,436

 15,107

 8,345

 3,568

 3,266

 306

 409

 102

 3,781

 3,684

 3,790

 3,794

 7,602

 7,619

 4,745

 311

 299

 325

 316

 271

 231

 246

 228

 258

 282

 251

 265

 268

 356

 421

 391

 388

 401

 406

 366

 265

 299

 298

 249

 230

 153

 119

 119

 119

 119

 290

5,807

8,104

7,862

7,491

7,040

7,733

7,675

6,749

3,862

3,808

3,964

7,359

6,445

6,173

6,180

7,209

7,247

7,089

7,138

3,653

-500

-27

20

-91

3,755

3,735

-181

-179

3,777

3,784

3,673

ELEV STORAGE

 157,038

 531,520

 539,624

 547,486

 554,977

 562,017

 569,750

 577,425

 584,174

 588,036

 591,844

 595,808

 603,167

 609,612

 615,785

 621,965

 629,174

 636,421

 643,510

 650,648

 654,301

 653,801

 653,774

 653,794

 653,703

 657,458

 661,193

 661,012

 660,833

 664,610

 668,394

 672,067

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 525,713

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0