alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.624 Removal of Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands spirits and rum imported from all other areas. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor must maintain separate accounts, in proof gallons, of Puerto Rican spirits having an alcoholic content of at least 92 percent rum, of Virgin Islands spirits having an alcoholic content of at least 92 percent rum, and of rum imported from all other areas removed from the processing account on determination of tax. A proprietor may determine the quantities of spirits in these categories that are contained in products mixed in processing with other alcoholic ingredients by using one of the methods referred to in paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section. The proprietor must report these quantities on the monthly report of operations referred to in § 19.632.
( b ) *Standard method.* For purposes of maintaining the separate accounts referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, a proprietor may determine the quantities of spirits in those specified categories based on the least amount of those spirits that may be used in each product as stated in the approved form TTB F 5110.38, Formula for Distilled Spirits Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act.
( c ) *Averaging method.* For purposes of the separate accounts referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, a proprietor may determine the quantities of spirits in those specified categories by computing the average quantity of those spirits contained in all batches of the same product formulation manufactured during the preceding six-month period. The average must be adjusted at the end of each month in order to include only the preceding six-month period.
( d ) *Alternative method.* If a proprietor wishes to use a method for determining the quantities of spirits as an alternative for a method prescribed in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section, the proprietor must file an application with the appropriate TTB officer. The written application must specifically describe the proposed alternative method and must explain the reasons for using the alternative method.
(26 U.S.C. 5555, 7652)
Second Department,

May, 1913.

#### In the Matter of the Application of Manhattan Bridge Three-Cent Line for the Appointment of Commissioners, etc.

Motion granted and order signed. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by Pub. L. 89–329, title I, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219, and amended by Pub. L. 90–575, Oct. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 1014; Pub. L. 91–230, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 121; Pub. L. 92–318, June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 93–29, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 30; Pub. L. 93–380, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 484; Pub. L. 93–644, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2291; Pub. L. 94–135, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 713; Pub. L. 94–482, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2081; Pub. L. 95–43, June 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 213; Pub. L. 96–49, Aug. 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 96–96, Oct. 31, 1979, 93 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 96–374, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1367; Pub. L. 97–300, Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 98–524, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2435; Pub. L. 99–386, Aug. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 821; Pub. L. 99–498, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1268; Pub. L. 100–418, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1107; Pub. L. 101–305, May 30, 1990, 104 Stat. 253; Pub. L. 101–610, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3127; Pub. L. 102–54, June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 267; Pub. L. 102–325, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 448; Pub. L. 103–208, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2457. Such title is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 105–244, title I, §101(a), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1585, without reference to such intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the title's provisions by Pub. L. 105–244.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 360.63

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.52

 360.63

 360.63

 360.66

 360.66

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.66

 360.68

 360.68

 360.68

 360.52

 360.46

 360.33

 360.33

 360.33

 360.33

 360.33

 581

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 573

 581

 581

 583

 583

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 583

 585

 585

 585

 573

 569

 560

 560

 560

 560

 560

STORAGE

+2

-8

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+8

+0

+2

+0

+8

+0

+0

+0

+0

-8

+2

+0

+0

-12

-4

-9

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 227

 192

 212

 220

 237

 256

 271

 296

 315

 337

 361

 375

 353

 321

 294

 276

 236

 221

 221

 220

 237

 280

 322

 345

 351

 350

 351

 334

 310

 254

 1,264

 1,093

 1,007

 1,010

 1,008

 1,004

 1,005

 1,001

 1,004

 1,004

 1,164

 1,250

 1,250

 1,250

 1,385

 1,500

 1,520

 1,515

 1,519

 1,380

 1,353

 1,387

 1,351

 1,114

 884

 724

 652

 654

 652

 657

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2008

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -19 0 33,561 8,575

ACRE-FEET -19 0 66,568 17,009

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 59,061

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 17,009

 142,638

 579

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 2,275

 1,782

 1,729

 1,748

 1,953

 2,066

 2,160

 2,323

 2,352

 2,393

 2,582

 2,651

 2,628

 2,621

 2,702

 2,718

 2,670

 2,659

 2,781

 2,721

 2,747

 2,770

 2,809

 2,628

 2,447

 2,284

 2,230

 2,234

 2,097

 1,947

 71,707

 142,231

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 66,568

 846

 504

 478

 457

 667

 817

 921

 1,076

 1,104

 1,110

 1,112

 1,113

 1,099

 1,101

 1,094

 947

 863

 870

 1,040

 1,138

 1,156

 1,176

 1,184

 1,173

 1,150

 1,149

 1,152

 1,154

 1,082

 1,043

 29,776

 59,061

RIVER CANALS

Table 14
#### State of Nebraska, ex rel. Herman E. Pankonin et al., v. County Commissioners of Cass County.

Filed March 8, 1899.

No. 10447.

1. Streams: Boundaries: Bridges: Expense op Repairs: Stare Decisis. The adjudication in *Dutton v. State,*42 Neb. 804, *held*to determine this case.

2.--: -: -: -. Ordinarily, where a stream of water constitutes the boundary line between two political subdivisions, each subdivision holds to the middle of the stream and accordingly is liable for bridge repairs, as laid down in *Dutton v. State,*42 Neb. 804, irrespective of the volume of flowag'e being nearer one bank than the other.

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Allen Beeson*and *J. L. Rool,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. J. Graves, contra.*

Ryan, C.

‘ Certain taxpayers of Cass county sought in the district court of Cass county by mandamus to compel the commissioners of said county to repair the north half of the bridge at Louisville across the Platte river, which forms the boundary line between Cass and Sarpy counties. On issues duly joined it was held by the said district court that the liability of each of said counties had been determined and settled in *Dutton v. State,*42 Neb. 804, and the writ was denied. In this we think the trial court held correctly, and shall therefore merely refer to ■the opinion in the case just cited for a fuller statement of facts than above given, if a fuller statement is desired.

It is now insisted, however, that the ruling in the case just cited should be modified because the waters of the Platte river opposite Louisville flow nearer the northern than the southern bank of said stream. There has *245been cited, no adjudication in support of this contention, and opposed to it are the following cases: *Dunlieth & Dubuque Bridge Co. v. County of Dubuque,*55 Ia. 558; *Rowe v. Smith,*51 Conn. 266; *In re Spier,*3 N. Y. Supp. 438; *Flynn v. City of Boston,*26 N. E. Rep. [Mass.] 868. We have been able to find no case holding differently from those above cited, and *Flynn v. Oily of Boston, supra,*is fortified by a large number of adjudications. We therefore assume that in this case the ordinary rule applies, that where a stream of water constitutes the boundary line between two political subdivisions of a state, each holds to the middle of the channel, — that is, to a line parallel to and midway between the banks, — and accordingly, under the authority of *Dutton v. State, supra,*each is liable for bridge repairs. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 33-8316 on Forms S-8 and S-3,Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-00883 onForm S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-48023 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-47835 onForm S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration StatementNo. 333-33147 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-11779 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 333-77595 and Registration StatementNos. 33-20226, 33-23699, 33-33571, 33-41330, 33-81914, 333-04041, 333-86875and 333-61549 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 16, 2001 appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sigma Designs, Inc. for the year endedJanuary 31, 2001.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.169 Application for employer identification number. ( a ) *Form SS-4.* The taxpayer must obtain an employer identification number (EIN) by filing an application with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on IRS Form SS-4. Form SS-4 is available from the local IRS Service Center, from the IRS District Director, the IRS Web site at *http://www.irs.gov* or from TTB's National Revenue Center. The taxpayer may file this form with IRS by mail, telephone, or fax by following the instructions on the form.
( b ) *Time limit.* If the taxpayer has not already received, or applied for, an EIN at the time that the first return on TTB Form 5000.24, Excise Tax Return, is filed, the taxpayer must apply for an EIN not later than seven days from the date of filing the Form 5000.24.
( c ) *One EIN only.* Each taxpayer must obtain and use only one EIN, regardless of the number of places of business for which the proprietor is required to file a tax return under this subpart.
(26 U.S.C. 6109)
[T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37405, July 28, 2009]
This document contains CBI and is not available online or from the USEPA

Docket Center.

Please contact the Document Control Officer listed in the Federal Register.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 220

 237

 242

 243

 244

 270

 327

 339

 378

 414

 454

 486

 524

 538

 534

 530

 531

 517

 505

 503

 519

 527

 522

 529

 533

 539

 539

 536

 534

 525

 522

 187

 188

 202

 217

 188

 238

 254

 276

 275

 295

 304

 322

 332

 357

 384

 394

 405

 407

 414

 410

 412

 428

 434

 432

 436

 440

 454

 438

 442

 451

 443

 196

 207

 222

 232

 224

 250

 279

 295

 318

 338

 360

 379

 397

 432

 445

 442

 442

 450

 447

 442

 451

 468

 466

 467

 466

 481

 484

 480

 472

 480

 476

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 428.96

 429.20

 429.42

 429.46

 429.42

 429.50

 429.66

 429.77

 429.87

 429.86

 429.92

 429.94

 429.94

 429.99

 429.97

 429.95

 430.09

 430.30

 430.53

 431.03

 431.55

 431.96

 432.38

 432.79

 433.37

 434.01

 434.73

 435.24

 435.56

 435.90

 604.4

 606.5

 608.5

 608.8

 608.5

 609.2

 610.6

 611.6

 612.5

 612.4

 612.9

 613.1

 613.1

 613.6

 613.4

 613.2

 614.5

 616.3

 618.4

 622.9

 627.6

 631.3

 635.1

 638.8

 644.1

 650.0

 656.7

 661.4

 664.4

 667.5

STORAGE

+2.2

+2.1

+2.0

+0.4

-0.4

+0.7

+1.4

+1.0

+0.9

-0.1

+0.5

+0.2

+0.0

+0.4

-0.2

-0.2

+1.3

+1.9

+2.1

+4.5

+4.7

+3.7

+3.8

+3.7

+5.3

+5.9

+6.7

+4.7

+3.0

+3.2

CHANGE

2,859

2,947

2,877

2,444

2,018

2,546

2,507

2,136

2,104

1,620

2,053

1,629

2,052

1,798

1,570

1,773

2,256

2,515

2,793

4,801

4,284

3,367

3,628

3,781

4,387

4,582

4,937

4,083

3,158

3,233

INFLOW

 1,542

 1,678

 1,712

 2,080

 2,007

 2,006

 1,654

 1,514

 1,503

 1,499

 1,612

 1,417

 1,898

 1,408

 1,481

 1,680

 1,446

 1,394

 1,610

 2,412

 1,801

 1,342

 1,527

 1,715

 1,512

 1,393

 1,373

 1,487

 1,460

 1,420

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 164

 153

 145

 152

 154

 137

 121

 128

 131

 130

 124

 122

 124

 136

 146

 147

 137

 130

 143

 128

 114

 130

 139

 141

 157

 166

 164

 163

 160

 165

PUMPING

 41

 41

 33

 33

 36

 44

 15

 0

 21

 36

 48

 0

 30

 30

 33

 36

 42

 42

 0

 0

 0

 27

 36

 43

 43

 64

 46

 49

 37

 53

C.F.S.

 .14

 .14

 .11

 .11

 .12

 .15

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .12

 .16

 .00

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .12

 .14

 .14

 .21

 .15

 .16

 .12

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .87

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .51

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .04

 1.17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 17, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +65.4 86,738 48,583 0 0 4,251 959 3.18 2.76

ACRE-FEET +65,400 172,045 96,364 0 0 8,432 1,902

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 96,364

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 8,432

TOTAL 104,796

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 18.74

 602.2

OUTLET 0 2.76
§ 24.69 Filing of claims. ( a ) *Claims.* All claims filed under this part for abatement, refund, credit, or remission of tax will be filed on TTB F 5620.8 (2635). Each claim filed under this part will: ( 1 ) Show the name, address, and title of the claimant;
( 2 ) Be signed by the claimant or the duly authorized agent of the claimant; and
( 3 ) Be executed under the penalties of perjury.
( b ) *Supporting documents.* Forms, supporting statements, and any other documents required by this part to be submitted with a claim will be attached to the claim and be considered a part of the claim. The appropriate TTB officer may require the submission of additional evidence in support of any claim filed under this part.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5064, 5370))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13683, Mar. 22, 1999]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0 924 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 32 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 4502 Filed 09/03/18 Entered 09/03/18 10:08:08 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 4502 Filed 09/03/18 Entered 09/03/18 10:08:08 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 10 a.m.-11.a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 410, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public

## Matter To Be Considered

*Decisional Matter:*                     Toddler Beds—Final Rule.                

                    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast.*

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: April 5, 2011.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-8480 Filed 4-6-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Newport International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Cery B. Perle, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 12, 2005                       /s/  Cery B. Perle
                                        -----------------------------
                                               Cery B. Perle.
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 304

 315

 300

 301

 295

 299

 279

 269

 263

 261

 261

 261

 254

 252

 250

 251

 256

 248

 247

 247

 241

 246

 235

 234

 237

 233

 233

 233

 231

 227

 223

 283

 249

 281

 276

 252

 264

 258

 255

 253

 249

 233

 242

 242

 240

 239

 237

 236

 236

 235

 230

 227

 224

 219

 223

 225

 222

 222

 219

 216

 215

 208

 289

 289

 288

 285

 279

 276

 269

 263

 258

 255

 249

 248

 248

 246

 243

 242

 241

 240

 238

 236

 234

 231

 228

 228

 228

 227

 226

 225

 223

 220

 216

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,963

 3,984

 4,003

 4,019

 4,023

 4,017

 4,002

 3,976

 3,944

 3,909

 3,868

 3,827

 3,786

 3,742

 3,696

 3,649

 3,602

 3,557

 3,516

 3,476

 3,441

 3,409

 3,379

 3,352

 3,331

 3,310

 3,288

 3,267

 3,247

 3,225

 3,200

 283

 285

 286

 287

 287

 287

 286

 284

 282

 279

 276

 273

 270

 267

 264

 261

 257

 254

 251

 248

 246

 244

 241

 239

 238

 236

 235

 233

 232

 230

 229

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 175

 172

 172

 174

 169

 166

 163

 162

 159

 154

 151

 150

 149

 147

 146

 145

 142

 140

 147

 141

 136

 134

 133

 130

 129

 129

 130

 127

 126

 126

 160

 161

 162

 162

 162

 159

 124

 152

 149

 143

 141

 142

 141

 140

 138

 138

 136

 134

 132

 130

 127

 126

 126

 125

 123

 122

 122

 122

 119

 119

 166

 166

 166

 166

 164

 164

 158

 156

 152

 148

 146

 145

 145

 144

 143

 141

 139

 137

 136

 134

 132

 130

 129

 127

 127

 126

 125

 124

 123

 123

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,136

 2,160

 2,184

 2,207

 2,226

 2,242

 2,249

 2,253

 2,252

 2,245

 2,235

 2,222

 2,206

 2,186

 2,163

 2,138

 2,111

 2,082

 2,054

 2,024

 1,998

 1,972

 1,949

 1,928

 1,909

 1,890

 1,870

 1,850

 1,830

 1,812

 153

 154

 156

 158

 159

 160

 161

 161

 161

 160

 160

 159

 158

 156

 155

 153

 151

 149

 147

 145

 143

 141

 139

 138

 136

 135

 134

 132

 131

 129

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER