alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 412.41

 412.03

 411.66

 411.34

 411.04

 410.75

 410.44

 410.07

 409.73

 409.46

 409.13

 408.83

 408.50

 408.22

 407.92

 407.53

 407.15

 406.88

 406.64

 406.41

 406.04

 405.86

 405.60

 405.37

 405.14

 405.00

 404.85

 404.60

 404.28

 404.03

 403.97

 468.0

 465.1

 462.3

 459.9

 457.6

 455.4

 453.1

 450.3

 447.8

 445.8

 443.4

 441.2

 438.8

 436.7

 434.5

 431.7

 428.9

 427.0

 425.3

 423.6

 421.0

 419.7

 417.9

 416.2

 414.6

 413.6

 412.6

 410.8

 408.6

 406.8

 406.4

STORAGE

-2.7

-2.9

-2.8

-2.4

-2.3

-2.2

-2.3

-2.8

-2.5

-2.0

-2.4

-2.2

-2.4

-2.1

-2.2

-2.8

-2.8

-1.9

-1.7

-1.6

-2.7

-1.3

-1.8

-1.6

-1.6

-1.0

-1.1

-1.8

-2.2

-1.8

-0.4

CHANGE

865

619

837

991

1,153

1,137

1,047

731

1,016

1,277

887

1,041

1,028

1,305

1,059

712

849

1,210

1,248

1,269

903

1,597

1,317

1,385

1,237

1,459

1,343

996

779

977

1,383

INFLOW

 1,976

 1,809

 1,997

 1,950

 2,034

 1,977

 1,968

 1,872

 2,031

 2,031

 1,869

 1,904

 1,998

 2,073

 1,912

 1,877

 1,996

 1,968

 1,879

 1,864

 2,020

 2,018

 2,020

 1,971

 1,817

 1,715

 1,620

 1,629

 1,660

 1,600

 1,346

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 187

 188

 180

 181

 184

 179

 185

 185

 187

 182

 181

 181

 184

 187

 185

 188

 174

 167

 178

 181

 166

 170

 175

 180

 179

 178

 186

 192

 191

 191

 187

PUMPING

 87

 84

 71

 79

 78

 76

 63

 70

 70

 72

 69

 69

 64

 79

 66

 71

 66

 56

 58

 55

 53

 53

 50

 55

 62

 66

 66

 57

 57

 68

 61

C.F.S.

 .34

 .33

 .28

 .31

 .31

 .30

 .25

 .28

 .28

 .29

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .32

 .27

 .29

 .27

 .23

 .24

 .23

 .22

 .22

 .21

 .23

 .26

 .28

 .28

 .24

 .24

 .29

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -64.3 33,657 58,401 0 0 5,639 2,051 8.37 .00

ACRE-FEET -64,300 66,759 115,838 0 0 11,185 4,068

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 115,838

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 11,185

TOTAL 127,023

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = .00

 470.7

OUTLET 0 .00
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1955

DORICOD UFANI EPIE,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-479-493)

Submitted: April 23, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann,

Assistant Director, Lisa M. Arnold, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Doricod Ufani Epie, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the Immigration

Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

On appeal, Epie raises challenges to the immigration

judge’s determination that he failed to establish his eligibility

for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying

eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he

presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). Administrative findings of

fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be

compelled to conclude to the contrary. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)

(2000). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that

Epie fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result.

Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief Epie seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Epie’s applications for withholding of removal and protection under

the Convention Against Torture. To qualify for withholding of

removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear probability of

persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430-31 (1987).

To obtain relief under the Convention Against Torture, an applicant
- 3 -

must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she

would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.”

8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2003). Based on our review of the

record, we find that Epie has failed to meet either one of these

standards.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: JAMES PATTERSON, NATHAN MOODY,

Appellants

______________________ 

2017-2364

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/103,813.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ANDREW V. TRASK, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by 

JAMES SHERWOOD, Google LLC, Washington, DC. 

 ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 

argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by 

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY,

MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

October 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 20/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.020.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 20 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5623 January 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.020.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 20

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5623 January 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 020/01 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.20867 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — State aid in favour of Carbosulcis — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 020/02 | State aid — Italy — State aid SA.33424 (2012/C) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Individual aid to the CCS Sulcis integrated project — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 12 |
| 2013/C 020/03 | State aid — Italian Republic — State aid SA.33413 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Delcomar S.r.l. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1) | 27 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 020/01

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.20867 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — State aid in favour of Carbosulcis — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

1

2013/C 020/02

State aid — Italy — State aid SA.33424 (2012/C) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Individual aid to the CCS Sulcis integrated project — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

12

2013/C 020/03

State aid — Italian Republic — State aid SA.33413 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Delcomar S.r.l. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU (1)

27

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1320** 

CHANG HUA ZENG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

COOSAW PARTNERS LLC; TERRY KINDER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:15

- cv
- 02023

- RMG

- MGB )

Submitted : June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chang Hua Zeng, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Lewis Smith, SMITH & KOONTZ, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee s .

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Chang Hua Zeng appeals the district court’s ord er dismissing

his complaint after concluding that res judicata precluded Chang’s

claims

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the Appellant’s b rief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chang’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis f or the district
court’s disposition, Chang h as forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the m aterials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
!"#"""$"

%
&''

	
	


		



In re: ) Chapter 7

)

NATASHA QUADELLA DEYO, ) Case No. 20-33368-KLP

)

Debtor. )


 	

 
! 		

"	
"	
 	

%&&'

'(')
'&'*
&&'%
&''+,&&-$&'%'&.(/'
&&

&'0
& )&'1'(&
+1

 '&-$&'%'&2'*&.(/'
& &

1

 '&'3#4)'(5	

%
&''%'*
&
'6'7'&'

,&)56'&'
'''&'
'&&&'' )
&(''&

)
&&',&'&(/&
')
&'
'') 
&''
'(/'
&&&',&

6'(''
'
'6'%'*
&&'
')
')&&8&'*
&/

&6'
&&&'



&&!9:*;;<=&

'

'' 
&&!;<(=

&
')&',&'
6
')&'
'
'
7))
'&'
&'



&
'=6&',&)

'7&
('
6)&'

	>
&
5*'&'	>
&
5'&'?
')&*
&

 
 	$

 %',&'
'(5	=

 *&@'&'
&&'
7'')''
'6'&''  6'&

&'&',&

Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 22 Filed 11/03/20 Entered 11/03/20 10:53:04 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
 %'&'&(/'
&&&' 
& )&'

 '&'&'&)'
&

(/'
& &&'1'(&
A

 ''$&''&
 B
5"

 9'&
5&'*'
>'
6'
')&.
'

&'&'&'

:'
6
'?&&&
''
'&

-%--18 C C              

9D%-1:%%-:	E9%*FB910-

D>)
&8

  CC  	

  

	

-G':	H






!"#"""$"




%&''()	

D'
'(5
'
&)5&&&')
'  ('''
6'
'
'(5'
'
5
&'

  CC  	



%
&''

"$

	

%
&''




 

E&
5,& '
5-G'

&&9:%
&''

.))
')&'9:%
&''

"-&	
:&
''&:&'"


 I

&J'1'5

"<2
'1
6'

	
 <



B'-E'-G'

E'K*

-&*
5:&
''&

.	$<"!


 !#"<"!

/s/ Keith L Phillips Nov 3 2020

Entered On Docket:Nov 3 2020

Case 20-33368-KLP Doc 22 Filed 11/03/20 Entered 11/03/20 10:53:04 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
| 1.   | The      undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial      Officer of Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown Media      Holdings”).  This Certification is made pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This      Certification accompanies the 10-Q Report of Crown Media Holdings for the      quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | We      certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and      that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Crown Media Holdings. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7354
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUTHER T. GOLDSMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CR-01-29) Submitted: August 4, 2006 Decided: August 15, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luther T. Goldsmith, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Luther T. Goldsmith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Goldsmith’s § 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Goldsmith , No. CR-01-29 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Carolyn Stebbins *v.*George S. Rhodes

*George 8. Rhodes,*pro se, the appellant (defendant).

*George W. Ganim,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued October 6

decided October 6, 1970

The motion by the defendant to set aside the judgment in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.118 Methyl *n*-butyl ketone. ( a ) *Acidity (as acetic acid).* 0.02 percent by weight, maximum.
( b ) *Color.* Colorless.
( c ) *Odor.* Characteristic odor.
( d ) *Refractive index at 20 °C.* 1.396 to 1.404.
( e ) *Specific gravity at 20 °/20 °C.* 0.800 to 0.835.
( f ) *Distillation range.* No distillate should come over below 123 °C. and none above 129 °C.
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]
EXHIBIT 12
1995 Form 10-K




                                     
           Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation
                              Computation of
                    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                          
                          
Dollars in Millions, for the Year
Ended December 31,                                            1995


Income from continuing operations before income taxes        $278.4
                                                            

Add:
    Interest on indebtedness                                   85.3
    Portion of rents representative of
      the interest factor                                       9.7

Earnings before fixed charges, income taxes
    and extraordinary items(1)                               $373.4

Fixed charges
    Interest on indebtedness                                 $ 85.3
    Portion of rents representative of
      the interest factor                                       9.7

Fixed charges(2)                                             $ 95.0

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges [(1) divided by (2)]        3.93
484 P.2d 328

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9182.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 26, 1971.

*487Robert N. Singer, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., C. Emery Cuddy, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant was found guilty of murder in the first degree and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed and the judgment was affirmed. State v. Ramirez, 79 N.M. 475, 444 P.2d 986. Subsequently, on November 7, 1969, he filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93) N.M.S.A. 1953] which was denied. Thereafter, on July 16, 1970, a second motion for relief was filed by him under the same rule, with a request that the court appoint counsel to aid him in connection with his motion. The court refused to appoint counsel and denied relief without a hearing, and he has appealed.

Appellant contends that failure to appoint counsel to assist him violated his constitutional rights to counsel and effectively denied him due process of law. There is no merit to his contentions. His motion was a successive motion and states no basis for relief. In this situation the appointment of counsel was not required. The court did not err in denying his motion without a hearing. State v. Tafoya, 81 N.M. 686, 472 P.2d 651 (Ct.App.). Compare State v. Sisneros, 79 N.M. 600, 446 P.2d 875.

The order denying relief should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

TACKETT and OMAN, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 447.00

 446.27

 445.36

 444.83

 444.33

 443.59

 442.74

 441.89

 441.14

 440.63

 440.24

 439.61

 439.32

 439.46

 439.72

 440.14

 439.93

 439.13

 438.28

 437.44

 436.73

 436.94

 437.25

 437.35

 437.35

 437.54

 438.07

 438.65

 439.45

 440.25

 942,676

 935,521

 926,628

 921,461

 916,596

 909,412

 901,183

 892,980

 885,763

 880,866

 877,128

 871,101

 868,331

 869,668

 872,152

 876,170

 874,161

 866,518

 858,423

 850,449

 843,728

 845,714

 848,649

 849,596

 849,596

 851,397

 856,427

 861,944

 869,572

 877,224

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,377

 2,103

 2,112

 2,409

 1,376

 2,441

 4,897

 4,756

 7,135

 3,447

 3,600

 2,408

 2,431

 2,429

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,287

 2,428

 1,164

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2019 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -69,085 47,423 7,714 -81,043

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-3,633

-7,155

-8,893

-5,167

-4,865

-7,184

-8,229

-8,203

-7,217

-4,897

-3,738

-6,027

-2,770

 1,337

 2,484

 4,018

-2,009

-7,643

-8,095

-7,974

-6,721

 1,986

 2,935

 947

 0

 1,801

 5,030

 5,517

 7,628

 7,652

 293

 344

 314

 314

 332

 318

 300

 310

 319

 307

 298

 318

 267

 299

 261

 263

 254

 225

 167

 194

 197

 207

 207

 202

 201

 193

 166

 165

 166

 313

-3,418

-3,290

-5,697

-1,732

-2,675

-5,165

-4,914

-7,356

-3,825

-3,854

-2,665

-4,001

-2,769

-3,529

-3,282

-3,370

-2,227

-360

-2,518

-2,546

-1,311

-642

-1,415

-2,625

-3,429

-2,696

-194

-462

-311

1,235

ELEV STORAGE

 1,377

 328,445

 325,155

 319,458

 317,726

 315,051

 309,886

 304,972

 297,616

 293,791

 289,937

 287,272

 283,271

 280,502

 276,973

 273,691

 270,321

 268,094

 267,734

 265,216

 262,670

 261,359

 260,717

 259,302

 256,677

 253,248

 250,552

 250,358

 249,896

 249,585

 250,820

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 331,863

-1,000

-1,000

-3,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2,900

-2,900

-2,900

-2,500

0

0

0

0

0

-1,200

-2,300

-3,300

-3,400

0

0

0

0

-26,400
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001103718
<NAME>                        ELVA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         696,253
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               806,295
<PP&E>                                         79,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (36,576)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,306,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,458
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,701
<OTHER-SE>                                     642,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,306,329
<SALES>                                        90,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               90,793
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               330,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,433)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (241,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (241,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### [§434. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–849, §2, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1126]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 703, related to interested persons acting as Government agents. Section was supplanted by section 208 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Oct. 23, 1962, see section 4 of Pub. L. 87–849, set out as an Effective Date note under section 201 of this title.