alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96736 / January 23, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20687

In the Matter of

Nikola Corporation,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP (“HRS”) to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of HRS

as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, HRS is appointed as 

the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric Danon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Elva  International,
Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d- 14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ Eric Danon
-----------------------------------------------
Eric Danon
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 434.99

 435.02

 434.87

 434.79

 434.63

 434.50

 434.19

 433.82

 433.76

 433.81

 433.63

 433.71

 433.75

 433.61

 433.78

 433.93

 434.12

 434.15

 434.17

 434.08

 434.10

 434.29

 434.42

 434.61

 434.71

 434.80

 434.83

 434.78

 434.77

 434.63

 434.65

 659.1

 659.4

 658.0

 657.2

 655.7

 654.5

 651.7

 648.3

 647.7

 648.2

 646.5

 647.3

 647.6

 646.3

 647.9

 649.3

 651.0

 651.3

 651.5

 650.7

 650.8

 652.6

 653.8

 655.6

 656.5

 657.3

 657.6

 657.1

 657.0

 655.7

 655.9

STORAGE

-0.6

+0.3

-1.4

-0.7

-1.5

-1.2

-2.9

-3.4

-0.6

+0.5

-1.7

+0.7

+0.4

-1.3

+1.6

+1.4

+1.8

+0.3

+0.2

-0.8

+0.2

+1.8

+1.2

+1.8

+0.9

+0.8

+0.3

-0.5

-0.1

-1.3

+0.2

CHANGE

2,569

2,996

2,083

2,354

2,194

1,932

1,399

1,373

2,238

2,093

2,400

2,379

1,669

1,914

2,531

3,012

2,814

1,982

1,931

1,451

2,018

2,944

2,456

2,533

2,407

2,212

1,596

1,719

1,909

1,303

1,910

INFLOW

 2,459

 2,497

 2,397

 2,369

 2,567

 2,151

 2,468

 2,798

 2,202

 1,531

 2,905

 1,641

 1,125

 2,208

 1,380

 1,954

 1,567

 1,469

 1,464

 1,523

 1,664

 1,724

 1,518

 1,322

 1,607

 1,444

 1,107

 1,594

 1,631

 1,711

 1,560

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 283

 279

 277

 266

 268

 272

 262

 229

 243

 261

 257

 267

 261

 264

 270

 275

 272

 266

 251

 252

 261

 258

 256

 252

 254

 263

 266

 266

 235

 216

 208

PUMPING

 108

 80

 108

 92

 105

 114

 113

 64

 70

 70

 70

 101

 98

 89

 95

 89

 92

 107

 123

 95

 0

 77

 77

 74

 80

 86

 83

 92

 89

 28

 49

C.F.S.

 .35

 .26

 .35

 .30

 .34

 .37

 .37

 .21

 .23

 .23

 .23

 .33

 .32

 .29

 .31

 .29

 .30

 .35

 .40

 .31

 .00

 .25

 .25

 .24

 .26

 .28

 .27

 .30

 .29

 .09

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -3.6 66,321 57,557 0 0 8,010 2,618 8.53 .00

ACRE-FEET -3,600 131,548 114,164 0 0 15,888 5,193

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 114,164

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 15,888

TOTAL 130,052

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = .00

 659.6

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
5

on.

u .

0 cL:

-~

/TI;l:cS'C,

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION 

Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave. 

NORTH DAKOTA Bismarck, ND 58501-1947 

DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH 701.328.5200 (fax) 

www.ndhealth.gov 

March I 0 

Ms. Callie Videtich (8P-AR) 

Director, Air Programs 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

U.S. EPA, Region 8
 

1595 Wynkoop Street
 

Denver, CO 80202-1129
 

Dear Ms. Videtich: 

We are writing in response to EPA's request for clarification of our interpretation of the North 

Dakota Interstate Transport SIP. In particular, you requested that we clarify the reference to the 

State's application of EPA's interim guidance on use of PMIO as a surrogate for PM25. Until that 

guidance has been ended or replaced, North Dakota intends to apply it consistent with EPA's 

interpretation of federal case law relevant to the use of the PM IO Surrogate Policy (e.g., 75 Fed. Reg. 

6827, 683 L-32; Feb. 11,20 (0). As part of the permit application review process for any application 

for which the applicant is seeking to rely on the Surrogate Policy, North Dakota will include in the 

p'ermit application record an adequate rationale to support the use of PM IO as a surrogate for 

based the facts and circumstances of the specific permit at issue. North Dakota will not proceed 

on general presumption that PM 10 is always a reasonable surrogate for PM25 . Further, North 

Dakota will be mindful of the limits provided in the policy itself, such as the need to identify the 

technical difficulties that justify the application of the policy in each specific case (75 Fed. Reg. at 

6834). However, to ensure national consistency, the Department believes EPA must develop more 

PM25 emission factors, finalize the stack testing methods for condensable particulate matter (Method 

202) and provide guidance for dispersion modeling analyses to demonstrate compliance with the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) increments for PM25 . 

1f ha any questions, feel free 

Sincerely; 

,. 

Terry L. O'tlair,P.E. , ' .
 

Director . . . I
 

Division .. . , 1i . 

xc : Domenico Mastrangelo; EPA. Region 8 

Environmental Health Division of Division of Division of Division of 

Section Chief's Office Air Quality Municipal Facilities Waste Management Water Quality 

701 .328.5150 701.328.5188 701.328.5211 701.328.5166 701 .328.5210 

Printed on recycled paper.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 596

 766

 939

 738

 1,102

 1,301

 1,761

 1,879

 1,358

 1,834

 2,219

 2,896

 2,763

 2,095

 1,283

 860

 1,656

 1,971

 2,129

 2,502

 4,020

 4,229

 2,431

 3,120

 2,844

 2,263

 2,177

 2,030

 902

 926

 537

 206

 196

 210

 171

 180

 177

 203

 177

 255

 312

 280

 284

 286

 284

 234

 224

 212

 216

 220

 274

 406

 346

 311

 269

 275

 289

 291

 295

 221

 224

 215

 303

 338

 307

 265

 287

 368

 469

 502

 497

 625

 771

 876

 813

 658

 516

 383

 384

 421

 506

 679

 1,131

 1,243

 710

 858

 706

 642

 639

 653

 409

 320

 290

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 13, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 6,535

 6,473

 6,441

 6,299

 6,120

 6,074

 6,050

 5,998

 5,941

 5,923

 6,077

 6,406

 6,758

 7,079

 7,292

 7,337

 7,414

 7,570

 7,789

 8,100

 8,762

 9,503

 9,716

 9,949

 9,884

 9,650

 9,476

 9,471

 9,364

 9,301

 9,207

 467

 462

 460

 450

 437

 434

 432

 428

 424

 423

 434

 458

 483

 506

 521

 524

 530

 541

 556

 579

 626

 679

 694

 711

 706

 689

 677

 677

 669

 664

 658

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1229 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Washington November 7, 2008 

 

 with 

Annex
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington November 7, 2008; 

 Entered into force December 29, 2008. 

 With annex.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 6,904

 6,763

 6,679

 4,251

 2,232

 2,087

 1,428

 4,141

 5,147

 4,484

 5,462

 5,724

 6,027

 7,048

 7,217

 6,965

 5,358

 5,209

 5,359

 4,832

 4,618

 5,320

 5,987

 6,565

 7,811

 7,335

 8,741

 7,127

 7,247

 5,581

 664

 944

 343

 537

 271

 248

 500

 441

 564

 611

 553

 490

 490

 451

 493

 440

 415

 551

 775

 587

 474

 599

 652

 657

 1,221

 546

 723

 865

 521

 727

 4,101

 3,846

 3,351

 2,590

 1,109

 868

 851

 1,779

 2,078

 1,622

 1,548

 1,726

 1,913

 2,369

 2,638

 2,839

 2,575

 2,632

 2,745

 2,069

 1,652

 2,009

 2,224

 2,920

 3,536

 3,853

 4,120

 3,683

 3,513

 3,367

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 46,614

 46,420

 46,399

 46,582

 45,375

 43,587

 41,584

 40,286

 39,144

 36,879

 35,054

 33,374

 31,515

 29,751

 28,288

 27,281

 26,505

 26,547

 28,183

 29,384

 30,185

 30,415

 30,561

 31,859

 33,847

 35,974

 38,181

 39,495

 40,370

 40,898

 3,330

 3,316

 3,314

 3,327

 3,241

 3,113

 2,970

 2,878

 2,796

 2,634

 2,504

 2,384

 2,251

 2,125

 2,021

 1,949

 1,893

 1,896

 2,013

 2,099

 2,156

 2,173

 2,183

 2,276

 2,418

 2,570

 2,727

 2,821

 2,884

 2,921

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Thinh Q. Tran, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.








By:
/s/  Thinh Q. TranThinh Q. TranChairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 28, 2011
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 20-03021-KRH Doc 30 Filed 12/09/20 Entered 12/09/20 11:02:53 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7
§ 76.796 What are the consequences of an SEA allocating more or fewer funds to a charter school LEA under a covered program than the amount for which the charter school LEA is eligible when the charter school LEA actually opens or significantly expands its enrollment? ( a ) An SEA that allocates more or fewer funds to a charter school LEA than the amount for which the charter school LEA is eligible, based on actual enrollment or eligibility data when the charter school LEA opens or significantly expands its enrollment, must make appropriate adjustments to the amount of funds allocated to the charter school LEA as well as to other LEAs under the applicable program.
( b ) Any adjustments to allocations to charter school LEAs under this subpart must be based on actual enrollment or other eligibility data for the charter school LEA on or after the date the charter school LEA first opens or significantly expands its enrollment, even if allocations or adjustments to allocations to other LEAs in the State are based on enrollment or eligibility data from a prior year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8065a)
**Exhibit 10.1**ADDENDUM**THIS IS AN ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 15,2005 WHEREIN IS REFERRED TO AS “LESSOR” AND IS REFERRED AS“LESSEE” FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 235 TENNANTAVENUE, #5, MORGAN HILL CALIFORNIA**The provisions of this Addendum shall amend and supersede theProvisions if the Lease Agreement where inconsistent. In allother aspects the Terms and Conditions contained in the LeaseAgreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1. RENT SCHEDULE     Months 01-06 $4640.00 Months 07-24 $5480.00  2. TERM OF LEASE    Two years from August 15, 2007 with one additional 2 year optional term.         **READ AND APPROVED**     **Lessee: Save The World Air, Inc.** **Lessor: Tom Jackson**         **By:** /s/ Charles R. Blum **By:** /s/ Tom Jackson                    **Date:** 8-14-07 **Date:** 8-10-07
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

December-09

Colored background verified with DFG's report Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,884 1,981 5,865 7,704 3,929 

2-Dec-09 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,479 1,987 5,466 6,900 3,942 

3-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,941 1,989 3,930 3,850 3,945 

4-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,944 1,991 3,935 3,855 3,950 

5-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,945 1,988 3,933 3,858 3,943 

6-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,957 1,988 3,945 3,882 3,943 

7-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,019 1,982 4,001 4,005 3,931 

8-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,961 1,973 3,934 3,890 3,914 

9-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,969 1,965 3,934 3,905 3,898 

10-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,060 1,965 4,025 4,086 3,898 

11-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 2,326 1,970 4,296 4,614 3,908 

12-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,367 1,976 4,342 4,694 3,919 

13-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,839 1,985 4,824 5,631 3,938 14-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,866 1,979 5,845 7,668 3,925 15-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,409 1,952 6,361 8,746 3,871 16-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,701 2,561 7,262 9,324 5,080 17-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,854 2,934 7,788 9,627 5,820 18-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,490 2,935 7,424 8,905 5,821 19-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,485 2,932 7,417 8,896 5,815 20-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,431 2,928 7,359 8,788 5,808 21-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,932 2,925 6,857 7,799 5,801 22-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,446 2,931 6,378 6,836 5,814 23-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,957 2,840 5,798 5,866 5,634 

24-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,095 2,243 7,337 10,105 4,448 25-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,499 1,980 6,479 8,923 3,928 26-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,011 1,989 6,000 7,955 3,946 27-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,997 1,990 5,988 7,929 3,948 28-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,956 1,991 5,948 7,847 3,950 29-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,433 1,993 5,426 6,809 3,953 30-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,507 1,290 4,797 6,956 2,558 31-Dec-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,964 1,007 3,972 5,880 1,998 

Total 0 4 4 XXXX 4 0 4 XXXX 0 0 103,722 67,142 170,864 205,733 133,176 

Official numbers are posted on DFG's websiteNote: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy C
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-2000
<CASH>                                         371,639
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,026,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                   122,370
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,355,656
<PP&E>                                         1,620,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                 957,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,266,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,241,015
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,917
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,266,143
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,008,124
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,522,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (64,042)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,298,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                   193,787
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,104,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,104,254
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.35




</TABLE>
#### Concetta Onorato et al., Appellants, v. P. Mouyios, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur; Johnston and Lewis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground that the determination that the operator of the car was driving it without authority is against the weight of the credible evidence.