Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Notices 19033 

1The EAR are currently codified at 15 CFR parts 

730–774 (2010). 

2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 

17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which 

has been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the most recent being that of August 12, 

2010 (75 FR 50681 (Aug. 16, 2010)), has continued 

the Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 

et seq. (2000)). 

Magazine Ranger District: Southwest 

Times Record, published daily in Fort 

Smith, AR. 

Pleasant Hill Ranger District: Johnson 

County Graphic, published weekly 

(Wednesday) in Clarksville, AR. 

St. Francis National Forest: The Daily 

World, published daily (Sunday through 

Friday) in Helena, AR. 

Sylamore Ranger District: Stone 

County Leader, published weekly 

(Wednesday) in Mountain View, AR. 

National Forests and Grasslands in 

Texas, Texas 

Forest Supervisor Decisions 

The Lufkin Daily News, published 

daily in Lufkin, TX. 

District Ranger Decisions 

Angelina National Forest: The Lufkin 

Daily News, published daily in Lufkin, 

TX. 

Caddo & LBJ National Grasslands: 

Denton Record-Chronicle, published 

daily in Denton, TX. 

Davy Crockett National Forest: The 

Lufkin Daily News, published daily in 

Lufkin, TX. 

Sabine National Forest: The Lufkin 

Daily News, published daily in Lufkin, 

TX. 

Sam Houston National Forest: The 

Courier, published daily in Conroe, TX. 

Dated: March 30, 2011. 

Jerome Thomas, 

Deputy Regional Forester. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8192 Filed 4–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Credit International Trading Co. Ltd; In 

the Matter of: Credit International 

Trading Co, Ltd (11th Institute), No. 2 

Zhong Guan Cun Nan Street, Haidian 

District, Beijing 100039, People’s 

Republic of China and No 9A 

Dongtucheng Road, Heping Street, 

Chaoyang District, Beijing, People’s 

Republic of China; 

Order Making Order Denying Export 

Privileges of Ruo Ling Wang Applicable 

to Related Person Credit International 

Trading Company 

Pursuant to Sections 766.25(h) and 

766.23 of the Export Administration 

Regulations 1 (‘‘EAR’’), the Bureau of 

Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. 

Department of Commerce, through its 

Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’), 

has requested that I make the Denial 

Order that was imposed against the 

individual Ruo Ling Wang (‘‘Wang’’) on 

April 18, 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 23897, 

April 25, 2006) applicable to Credit 

International Trading Co, Ltd (11th 

Institute), (‘‘Credit International’’), with 

addresses at: No. 2 Zhong Guan Cun 

Nan Street, Haidian District, Beijing 

100039, People’s Republic of China, and 

No 9A Dongtucheng Road, Heping 

Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 

People’s Republic of China, (hereinafter, 

the ‘‘Related Person’’), as a person 

related to Wang. 

Section 766.23 of the EAR provides 

that ‘‘[i]n order to prevent evasion, 

certain types of orders under this part 

may be made applicable not only to the 

respondent, but also to other persons 

then or thereafter related to the 

respondent by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business. Orders that may be made 

applicable to related persons include 

those that deny or affect export 

privileges * * *.’’ 15 CFR 766.23(a). 

On April 18, 2006, then Director of 

Office of Exporter Services issued an 

Order pursuant to Section 11(h) of the 

Export Administration Act of 1979, as 

amended (currently codified at 50 

U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000)) 

(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Section 766.25 of the EAR 

denying the export privileges under the 

Regulations of Wang for 10 years. The 

Order was based on Wang’s conviction 

of violating the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et 

seq. (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Wang was 

convicted of knowingly and willfully 

making a false statement and concealing 

a material fact from the Bureau of 

Industry Security (‘‘BIS’’) and the former 

U.S. Customs Service. 

BIS has presented evidence that 

indicates that Credit International is 

related to Wang by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business, and that it is necessary to 

add this entity to the Wang Denial Order 

in order to avoid evasion of that Order. 

The basis for naming Credit 

International to the Wang Denial Order 

is that Wang acting for, as, or on behalf 

of Credit International, is actively 

involved in attempting to procure items 

for export from the United States. 

As provided in Section 766.23 of the 

EAR, I gave notice to Credit 

International that its export privileges 

under the EAR could be denied for up 

to 10 years due to its relationship with 

Wang and that BIS believes naming 

Credit International as a related party to 

Wang would be necessary to prevent 

evasion of a denial order imposed 

against Wang. In providing such notice, 

I gave Credit International an 

opportunity to oppose its addition to the 

Wang Denial Order as a related party. 

Having received no submission, I have 

decided, following consultations with 

BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, 

including its Director, to name Credit 

International as a Related Person to the 

Wang Denial Order, thereby denying 

Credit International export privileges for 

10 years from the date of Wang’s 

conviction. 

I have also decided to revoke all 

licenses issued pursuant to the Act or 

EAR in which Credit International had 

an interest at the time of Wang’s 

conviction. The 10-year denial period 

will end on May 2, 2015. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

Ordered 

First, that having been provided 

notice and opportunity for comment as 

provided in Sections 766.25 and 766.23 

of the Export Administration 

Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’), the 

following entity, Credit International 

Trading Co., Ltd. (11th Institute) 

(‘‘Credit International’’), with last known 

addresses at No. 2 Zhong Guan Cun Nan 

Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100039, 

People’s Republic of China, and No 9A 

Dongtucheng Road, Heping Street, 

Chaoyang District, Beijing, People’s 

Republic of China has been determined 

to be related to Wang by affiliation, 

ownership, control, or position of 

responsibility in the conduct of trade or 

related services, and it has been deemed 

necessary to make the Order denying 

the export privileges of Wang applicable 

to Credit International in order to 

prevent evasion of the Wang Denial 

Order. 

Second, that the denial of export 

privileges described in the Wang Denial 

Order, which was published in the 

Federal Register on April 25, 2006 at 71 

FR 23896, shall be made applicable to 

Credit International until its expiration 

on May 2, 2015, as follows: 

I. Credit International, with last 

known addresses at No. 2 Zhong Guan 

Cun Nan Street, Haidian District, Beijing 

100039, People’s Republic of China, and 

No 9A Dongtucheng Road, Heping 

Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 

People’s Republic of China, and when 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

19034 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Notices 

acting for or on behalf of Credit 

International, its representatives, agents, 

officers or employees (collectively, 

‘‘Related Person’’) may not participate, 

directly or indirectly, in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefiting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

II. No person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Related Person any item subject 

to the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Related Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Related Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Related Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Related Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Related 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Related Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that in accordance with the 

provisions of Section 766.23(c) of the 

Regulations, the Related Person may, at 

any time, make an appeal related to this 

Order by filing a full written statement 

in support of the appeal with the Office 

of the Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 

South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 

21202–4022. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the Regulations 

where the only items involved that are 

subject to the Regulations are the 

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Fifth, that this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until May 2, 2015. 

Sixth, that this Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register and a 

copy served on the Related Person. 

Issued this 30 day of March 2011. 

Bernard Kritzer, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8194 Filed 4–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–971] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

preliminarily determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

multilayered wood flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China. For 

information on the estimated subsidy 

rates, see the ‘‘Suspension of 

Liquidation’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler, Matthew Jordan, Patricia 

Tran, or Joshua Morris, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0189, (202) 482– 

1540, (202) 482–1503, and (202) 482– 

1779, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Case History 

The following events have occurred 

since the publication of the Department 

of Commerce’s (‘‘Department’’) notice of 

initiation in the Federal Register. See 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigation, 75 FR 

70719 (November 18, 2010) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’), and the accompanying 

Initiation Checklist. 

On November 18, 2010, the 

Department released the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for 

the instant investigation under 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

to all parties with APO access. See 

Memorandum to File from Matthew 

Jordan, International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, ‘‘Release of Customs and 

Border Protection Entry Data to 

Interested Parties for Comment’’ 

(November 18, 2010) at Attachment 1. 

This memorandum is on file in the 

Department’s Central Records Unit 

(‘‘CRU’’) in Room 7046 of the main 

Department building. We received 

comments on this CBP data from Fine 

Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. (‘‘Fine 

Furniture’’) on November 19, 2010, and 

Dun Hua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. and Chinafloors Timber (China) 

Co., Ltd. on November 24, 2010. We 

received comments from Shanghai 

Lizhong Wood Product Co., Ltd. and the 

Coalition for American Hardwood Parity 

(Anderson Hardwood Floors, LLC; 

Award Hardwood Floors; Baker’s Creek 

Wood Floors, Inc.; From the Forest; 

Howell Hardwood Flooring; 

Mannington Mills, Inc.; Nydree 

Flooring; Shaw Industries Group, Inc.) 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioner’’) on November 

26, 2010. 

In their comments, the interested 

parties unanimously requested that the 

Department forgo using CBP data for its 

selection of mandatory respondents. 

Instead, the parties stated, the 

Department should issue quantity and 

value (‘‘Q&V’’) questionnaires to the 

companies identified by Petitioner as 

potential producers/exporters of the 

subject merchandise. After examining 

the CBP data, the Department agreed 

that the data did not provide a basis for 

selecting respondents and determined it 

was necessary to issue Q&Vs. 

On December 2, 2010, and December 

3, 2010, the Department issued Q&Vs to 

the 174 companies listed in the Petition, 

plus two additional companies that 

identified themselves via requests for 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES