alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE>                                        9                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997                      
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997                  
<CASH>                                         47,660
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            396
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               13,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    58,844 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          1,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            1,000
<LOANS>                                       433,149
<ALLOWANCE>                                     6,649 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                589,755 
<DEPOSITS>                                    526,269 
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             9,856 
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                       29,587 
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,043 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                589,755 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                39,357 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,976 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                1,977 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               44,310
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             16,859 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,099 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          27,211
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   2,480 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  8
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                24,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,216
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      7,509 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    7,509 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5.82
<LOANS-NON>                                     5,983 
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,382 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                4,546
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   1,490 
<RECOVERIES>                                      249 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               6,649 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            6,649 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        



</TABLE>
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WAYNE NEVILLE MORRIS, Plaintiff,
v. Civil ActionNo. 09-2034 (RJL) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

### etaI., Defendants.



### MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter is before the Court on four motions filed by plaintiff, all ofwhich will be denied.Plaintiffis a federal prisoner who has filed this action to challenge the Federal Bureau of Prisons' policies regarding religious diets. He alleges that prison officials have retaliated against him for having pursued his challenges at the administrative level, and he asks the Courtto take judicial notice ofdocuments pertaining to inmate grievances he has filed and a recent disciplinary matter which has resulted in his temporary transferto a special housing unit. Ordinarily, the Court may takejudicial notice ofmatters ofpublic record, such as prior courtproceedings. See, e.g., Covad Commc 'ns. Co. v. BellAtl. Corp., 407 F.3d 1220, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (permitting judicial notice offacts in public records ofotherproceedings); Valore v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Nos. 03-cv-1959, 06-cv-516, 06-cv-750 & 08-cv-1273, 2010 WL 1244552, at *3 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2010) (takingjudicial notice ofrelated proceedings and records in cases before the same

1court). The matters about which plaintiffasks the Courtto takejudicial notice are not matters of public record, and the motions will be denied. Plaintiffalso requests an extension oftime "to file his rebuttal to the respondents' response." Mot. for Extension ofTime at 1. There is no pendingmotion or orderrequiring plaintiff's response at this time, and the motion will be denied as moot. Lastly, plaintiffrequests an injunction against "furtherretaliations." Mot. to Renew Pet. for an Inj. at 1. The motion will be denied because plaintifffails to "demonstrate[]: 

### (1) a substantial likelihood ofsuccess onthe merits, (2) that [he] would suffer irreparable injury ifthe injunction is not granted, (3) that an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties, and (4) that the public interest would be furthered bythe injunction." 

### In re Navy Chaplaincy, 516 F. Supp. 2d 119,122 (D.D.C. 2007) (citations omitted), 

### ajJ'd, 534 F.3d 756 (D.C. Cir. 2008), 

### cert. deniedsub nom. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. 

### Dep 't of the Navy, 129 S.Ct. 1918 (2009). It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for the court to takejudicial notice [# 9, 15], for an extension oftime [# 14] and for injunctive relief[# 16] are DENIED. SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge DATE:

2
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-26-2007

USA v. Shedrick

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-2329

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Shedrick" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1154.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1154
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-2329

 

UNITED STATES

v.

JAMES SHEDRICK,

Appellant

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 02-cr-00523)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

 

Before: AMBRO, FUENTES, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

 O R D E R 

The panel in the above-captioned case hereby grants panel rehearing sua sponte, and the

precedential opinion filed February 28, 2007, reported at 478 F.3d 519 (3d Cir. 2007), is

hereby vacated.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro 

 Circuit Judge

Dated: April 26, 2007

ARL/cc: PAL; TPH
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.92 Denaturants listed as U.S.P. or N.F.

Denaturing materials and products listed in this part as “U.S.P.” or “N.F.” shall meet the specifications set forth in the current United States Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary, or the latest volume of these publications in which the denaturants appeared as official preparations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.31

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.44

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.39

 48.39

 48.39

 48.37

 48.37

 48.36

 48.36

 48.34

 48.36

 48.34

 48.32

 48.32

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.28

 48.34

 48.32

 48.30

 48.28

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.05

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

CHANGE

71

65

77

80

62

40

59

59

57

38

48

52

38

49

33

43

29

46

26

20

32

18

24

29

23

22

13

58

18

22

18

INFLOW

 71

 65

 65

 65

 59

 47

 47

 47

 47

 42

 42

 42

 36

 36

 31

 31

 27

 31

 27

 22

 22

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 14

 27

 22

 18

 14

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 8

 8

 11

 14

 11

 10

 11

 11

 9

 4

 5

 9

 10

 12

 10

 11

 10

 5

 7

 6

 9

 8

 5

 10

 4

 3

 7

 3

 4

 12

 12

C.F.S.

 .14

 .14

 .19

 .25

 .20

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .15

 .07

 .09

 .16

 .18

 .21

 .17

 .19

 .18

 .08

 .12

 .11

 .15

 .14

 .08

 .17

 .07

 .06

 .13

 .05

 .07

 .21

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .10

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/01/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.25 1,269 31 1,087 259 4.54 .46

ACRE-FEET -250 2,517 61 2,156 514

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 2,156

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 2,217

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .46

JULY 1, 2009 17.11

 48.50
### §173. Omitted

Section, act May 27, 1921, ch. 14, §407, 42 Stat. 18, which directed the Secretary to make rules and regulations necessary for the enforcement of sections 160 to 171 of this title was omitted in view of the repeal of sections 160 to 171 of this title by Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §106(a), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 193.
#### § 24.130 Change in volatile fruit-flavor concentrate operations.

If the proprietor desires to make any change in the process employed to produce volatile fruit-flavor concentrate and the change affects the accuracy of the description of process included in the application, the proprietor shall file an amended application to include the amended or new process. The new or changed process may not be used prior to approval of the amended application.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended, 1392, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5356, 5511))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0058)
§ 24.92 Products in customs custody. Products in customs custody may be conveyed across bonded wine premises subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The products are not stored or allowed to remain on bonded wine premises beyond the close of the business day; and
( b ) The products in customs custody are kept separate from wine and spirits on bonded wine premises.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1379, as amended, 1380, as amended, 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C 5357, 5361, 5365))
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

§ 1.24 Qualifications of applicants. The application of any person shall be granted and the permit issued by the appropriate TTB officer if the applicant proves to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that: ( a ) Such person (or in case of a corporation, any of its officers, directors, or principal stockholders) has not, within 5 years prior to the date of application, been convicted of a felony under Federal or State law, and has not, within 3 years prior to date of application, been convicted of a misdemeanor under any Federal law relating to liquor, including the taxation thereof; and
( b ) Such person, by reason of the person's business experience, financial standing or trade connections, is likely to commence operations as a distiller, warehouseman and bottler, rectifier, wine producer, wine blender, importer, or wholesaler, as the case may be, within a reasonable period and to maintain such operations in conformity with Federal law; and
( c ) The operations proposed to be conducted by such person are not in violation of the law of the State in which they are to be conducted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,684

 1,792

 1,860

 1,977

 1,974

 1,955

 1,984

 2,039

 2,232

 2,420

 2,634

 2,705

 2,749

 3,031

 3,081

 2,912

 2,729

 2,698

 2,672

 2,661

 2,708

 2,797

 2,930

 2,819

 2,644

 2,613

 2,573

 2,625

 2,660

 2,592

 1,351

 1,363

 1,395

 1,371

 1,374

 1,301

 1,317

 1,311

 1,335

 1,372

 1,486

 1,610

 1,687

 1,762

 1,792

 1,798

 1,704

 1,696

 1,707

 1,668

 1,563

 1,578

 1,515

 1,476

 1,540

 1,661

 1,706

 1,749

 1,810

 1,765

 1,534

 1,580

 1,607

 1,621

 1,617

 1,605

 1,608

 1,636

 1,725

 1,856

 1,997

 2,135

 2,221

 2,397

 2,408

 2,361

 2,217

 2,207

 2,196

 2,161

 2,143

 2,217

 2,133

 2,087

 2,101

 2,156

 2,180

 2,219

 2,268

 2,209

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For
the month of June 2011
 Commission File Number: 000-50596
 Linktone Ltd.
 
 
 
  þ Form 20-F o Form 40-F
 o
 o
 o þ




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release Regarding Earnings Results for the
    First Quarter of 2011, dated June 9, 2011




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Linktone Ltd.Date: June 14, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Peck Joo TanName:
    Peck Joo TanTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 289

 268

 271

 263

 258

 251

 245

 251

 251

 261

 261

 264

 318

 250

 194

 268

 293

 273

 283

 282

 290

 265

 257

 263

 285

 262

 281

 276

 217

 216

 225

 236

 222

 218

 230

 229

 228

 225

 187

 225

 174

 174

 139

 145

 231

 233

 231

 221

 224

 216

 214

 216

 214

 224

 216

 227

 255

 248

 247

 247

 240

 239

 238

 239

 237

 242

 244

 242

 237

 205

 167

 201

 257

 255

 260

 250

 250

 245

 241

 243

 248

 247

 248

 254

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy B. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                              /s/ Timothy B. Hansen
                              ---------------------
                              Timothy B. Hansen
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              September 13, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,209

 1,160

 1,141

 1,137

 1,153

 1,150

 1,159

 1,176

 1,292

 1,292

 1,291

 1,270

 1,239

 1,232

 1,256

 1,297

 1,297

 1,296

 1,312

 1,297

 1,317

 1,348

 1,353

 1,457

 1,457

 1,575

 1,554

 1,513

 1,447

 1,409

 726

 778

 731

 714

 699

 861

 889

 919

 1,024

 959

 954

 953

 930

 938

 941

 950

 945

 955

 978

 1,006

 1,014

 1,038

 1,076

 1,118

 1,114

 1,110

 1,115

 1,111

 1,092

 1,089

 943

 915

 891

 901

 870

 958

 1,003

 1,047

 1,134

 1,114

 1,101

 1,101

 1,097

 1,096

 1,096

 1,103

 1,099

 1,100

 1,136

 1,136

 1,132

 1,164

 1,188

 1,241

 1,265

 1,291

 1,291

 1,264

 1,236

 1,221

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 19.392 Converting denatured alcohol to a different formula. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor may convert specially denatured alcohol (SDA) from one formula of SDA to another formula of SDA if the resultant mixture contains only alcohol and the denaturants listed for an approved SDA formula and in the correct concentrations, as set forth in part 21 of this chapter. Such converted SDA may be used only as authorized in part 21 of this chapter.
( b ) *Converting SDA to SDA Formula No. 1* — ( 1 ) *All SDA other than SDA Formulas No. 3-A and No. 30.* A proprietor may convert any SDA, other than SDA produced under Formulas No. 3-A and No. 30, into SDA Formula No. 1 by adding methyl alcohol and any one of the other alternative denaturants listed in § 21.32 of this chapter in accordance with the formulation prescribed in that section.
( 2 ) *SDA Formulas No. 3-A and No. 30.* SDA Formulas No. 3-A and No. 30 specify more methyl alcohol than is specified for SDA Formula No. 1. Therefore, in order to convert SDA produced under Formulas No. 3-A or No. 30 into SDA under Formula No. 1, a proprietor must first add a sufficient amount of ethyl alcohol to the SDA in question to bring the methyl alcohol content to the proportion prescribed for SDA Formula No. 1. After adjusting the proportion of methyl alcohol, the proprietor must add the specified amount of any one of the other alternative denaturants listed in § 21.32 of this chapter.
( c ) *Converting SDA to SDA Formula No. 29.* A proprietor may convert any SDA into SDA Formula No. 29 by adding the amount of acetaldehyde or ethyl acetate specified in § 21.56 of this chapter. However, due to the presence of other denaturants from the original formula, SDA under Formula No. 29 that has been converted from another SDA formula may be used only as authorized in § 21.56(b) but not in the manufacture of vinegar, drugs or medicinal chemicals, and the conditions governing use provided in § 21.56(c) will apply.
( d ) *Other conversions of SDA.* If a proprietor wishes to make an SDA formula conversion other than one authorized in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section, the proprietor must obtain approval from the appropriate TTB officer prior to the conversion.
( e ) *Conversions to completely denatured alcohol.* A proprietor may convert any SDA from a formula that does not contain methyl alcohol or wood alcohol to any one of the completely denatured alcohol (CDA) formulas prescribed in subpart C of part 21 of this chapter, by adding the denaturants specified for CDA.
(26 U.S.C. 5242)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 409.95

 409.69

 409.43

 409.05

 408.64

 408.17

 407.81

 407.63

 407.51

 407.28

 407.17

 407.11

 406.85

 406.77

 406.73

 406.73

 406.62

 406.56

 406.47

 406.32

 406.11

 405.95

 405.96

 405.91

 405.76

 405.49

 405.35

 405.21

 404.92

 404.71

 449.4

 447.5

 445.6

 442.8

 439.8

 436.3

 433.7

 432.4

 431.5

 429.9

 429.1

 428.6

 426.8

 426.2

 425.9

 425.9

 425.1

 424.7

 424.1

 423.0

 421.5

 420.3

 420.4

 420.0

 419.0

 417.1

 416.1

 415.1

 413.0

 411.6

STORAGE

-2.2

-1.9

-1.9

-2.8

-3.0

-3.4

-2.6

-1.3

-0.9

-1.7

-0.8

-0.4

-1.9

-0.6

-0.3

+0.0

-0.8

-0.4

-0.6

-1.1

-1.5

-1.1

+0.1

-0.4

-1.1

-1.9

-1.0

-1.0

-2.0

-1.5

CHANGE

1,819

2,054

2,001

1,558

1,473

1,425

1,563

1,402

1,674

1,697

2,184

2,073

1,510

2,072

2,058

2,008

1,702

2,004

1,673

1,559

1,281

1,533

2,050

1,954

1,439

1,099

1,635

1,600

1,125

1,381

INFLOW

 2,630

 2,720

 2,703

 2,680

 2,687

 2,860

 2,591

 1,771

 1,848

 2,241

 2,276

 2,006

 2,195

 2,142

 1,993

 1,778

 1,855

 1,959

 1,734

 1,826

 1,785

 1,852

 1,755

 1,866

 1,715

 1,797

 1,866

 1,844

 1,921

 1,911

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 219

 243

 207

 230

 235

 234

 227

 222

 198

 229

 244

 220

 212

 180

 179

 194

 201

 213

 216

 219

 204

 202

 204

 208

 209

 216

 214

 199

 174

 176

PUMPING

 62

 62

 62

 67

 67

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 46

 39

 31

 36

 43

 48

 48

 55

 50

 55

 55

 58

 50

 50

 55

 57

 62

 35

C.F.S.

 .25

 .25

 .25

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .19

 .16

 .13

 .15

 .18

 .20

 .20

 .23

 .21

 .23

 .23

 .24

 .21

 .21

 .23

 .24

 .26

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -40.0 50,606 62,807 0 0 6,328 1,655 6.83 .25

ACRE-FEET -40,000 100,377 124,578 0 0 12,552 3,283

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 124,578

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 12,552

TOTAL 137,130

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2009 TO DATE = .25

 451.6

OUTLET 0 .25