alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stanley H. Janeczko et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage arising out of a collision between a bus owned by defendant and an automobile operated by plaintiff Janeczko and owned by plaintiff Sankowsky, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered on a jury verdict in their favor in the sums of $50,000 and $535 respectively. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of respondent Sankowsky, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of respondent Janeczko, reversed on the facts, the actions severed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless within ten days after the entry of the order hereon said respondent stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict to $35,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, as to respondent Janeczko the verdict was excessive. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,861

 16,219

 17,080

 17,278

 17,259

 16,947

 16,865

 16,029

 13,649

 11,334

 11,413

 12,801

 15,194

 14,855

 12,040

 10,124

 7,787

 5,782

 6,739

 5,714

 4,909

 5,262

 6,160

 2,936

 1,874

 867

 731

 545

 490

 492

 484

 7,025

 7,399

 8,181

 7,503

 7,386

 6,417

 6,506

 6,555

 6,863

 6,563

 5,445

 5,457

 6,902

 4,171

 2,777

 1,184

 473

 410

 352

 311

 303

 350

 453

 381

 286

 230

 243

 215

 194

 194

 196

 10,048

 10,915

 12,193

 12,151

 11,289

 10,758

 10,964

 10,729

 10,484

 9,198

 8,315

 8,906

 10,115

 9,416

 6,770

 5,674

 3,969

 2,967

 2,878

 2,530

 2,145

 2,009

 2,540

 1,841

 913

 488

 432

 337

 310

 318

 292

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §3554. Africa trade and development policy

#### (a) Development of policy

The President should develop and implement a comprehensive trade and development policy for the countries of Africa.

#### (b) Reports to Congress

The President shall, not later than 12 months after December 8, 1994, and annually thereafter for a period of 4 years, submit to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Finance and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and other appropriate committees of the Congress, a report on the steps taken to carry out subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, §134, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4840.)
§ 463.240 What are the requirements for data validation of State annual performance reports? ( a ) States must establish procedures, consistent with guidelines issued by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, to ensure that they submit complete annual performance reports that contain information that is valid and reliable, as required by WIOA sec. 116(d)(5).
( b ) If a State fails to meet standards in paragraph (a) of this section as determined by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, the appropriate Secretary will provide technical assistance and may require the State to develop and implement corrective actions, which may require the State to provide training for its subrecipients.
( c ) The Secretaries of Labor and Education will provide training and technical assistance to States in order to implement this section. States must comply with the requirements of sec. 116(d)(5) of WIOA as explained in guidance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,147

 2,170

 2,088

 2,203

 2,298

 2,227

 2,234

 2,233

 2,217

 2,170

 2,170

 2,261

 2,286

 2,204

 2,205

 2,201

 2,041

 2,030

 1,996

 1,763

 1,747

 1,787

 1,779

 1,785

 1,791

 1,851

 1,921

 2,034

 2,060

 2,228

 2,275

 1,327

 1,393

 1,351

 1,403

 1,444

 1,339

 1,343

 1,421

 1,421

 1,398

 1,443

 1,465

 1,412

 1,292

 1,369

 1,403

 1,365

 1,377

 1,311

 1,294

 1,372

 1,346

 1,324

 1,317

 1,306

 1,307

 1,271

 1,266

 1,293

 1,343

 1,331

 1,760

 1,807

 1,833

 1,870

 1,907

 1,809

 1,802

 1,841

 1,806

 1,778

 1,823

 1,874

 1,857

 1,752

 1,757

 1,795

 1,747

 1,761

 1,675

 1,587

 1,589

 1,586

 1,555

 1,521

 1,543

 1,583

 1,590

 1,599

 1,627

 1,736

 1,784

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 21, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §4621. Termination of USMCA

#### (a) Termination of USMCA country status

During any period in which a country ceases to be a USMCA country, this Act (other than this subsection and title IX) and the amendments made by this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to that country.

#### (b) Termination of USMCA

On the date on which the USMCA ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, this Act and the amendments made by this Act (other than this subsection and title IX) shall cease to have effect.

(Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §621, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 80.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 116–113, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 11, known as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act. Title IX of the Act (134 Stat. 98) provides for USMCA supplemental appropriations and is not classified to the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4501 of this title and Tables.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Service notice of filing of a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

# DATES:

January 18, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brandy Osimokun, 202-268-2982.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that on December 23, 2010, it filed with the Postal Regulatory                           ( print page 2931)                        Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Select Contract 1 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2011-16, CP2011-53.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2011-856 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
(No. 6871

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Illinois State Museum, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

D. K. McIntosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,979

 1,947

 1,805

 1,707

 1,627

 1,560

 1,549

 1,336

 1,369

 1,425

 1,582

 1,628

 1,806

 1,900

 2,145

 2,275

 2,378

 2,479

 2,417

 2,439

 2,172

 2,006

 2,183

 2,141

 2,107

 2,265

 2,254

 2,303

 2,297

 2,696

 2,647

 850

 839

 830

 793

 816

 851

 846

 828

 832

 833

 844

 858

 846

 847

 848

 877

 913

 906

 994

 984

 987

 981

 1,002

 1,009

 914

 899

 921

 950

 963

 1,022

 1,025

 1,261

 1,232

 1,163

 1,109

 1,096

 1,081

 1,053

 1,005

 1,006

 1,076

 1,061

 1,038

 1,084

 1,147

 1,204

 1,262

 1,327

 1,382

 1,414

 1,416

 1,328

 1,347

 1,359

 1,281

 1,242

 1,280

 1,320

 1,359

 1,397

 1,555

 1,565

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 14,928

 15,262

 15,421

 15,501

 15,618

 15,698

 15,707

 15,697

 15,721

 15,789

 15,799

 15,674

 15,532

 15,412

 15,355

 15,385

 15,549

 15,822

 16,140

 16,475

 16,750

 17,092

 17,445

 17,650

 17,831

 18,073

 18,309

 18,521

 18,714

 19,007

 19,245

 1,066

 1,090

 1,102

 1,107

 1,116

 1,121

 1,122

 1,121

 1,123

 1,128

 1,129

 1,120

 1,109

 1,101

 1,097

 1,099

 1,111

 1,130

 1,153

 1,177

 1,196

 1,221

 1,246

 1,261

 1,274

 1,291

 1,308

 1,323

 1,337

 1,358

 1,375

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
13C NMR in DMSO-D6:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 354

 417

 521

 707

 1,015

 1,247

 1,425

 1,445

 1,317

 780

 729

 585

 577

 556

 381

 844

 1,122

 1,134

 1,612

 1,824

 1,583

 1,176

 1,479

 1,531

 804

 930

 650

 655

 680

 775

 895

 221

 217

 217

 219

 231

 242

 252

 252

 257

 250

 259

 236

 241

 245

 232

 241

 239

 238

 235

 263

 237

 233

 244

 252

 244

 250

 235

 236

 232

 226

 241

 241

 243

 257

 299

 376

 468

 493

 458

 493

 413

 397

 335

 309

 296

 258

 327

 378

 426

 526

 641

 673

 473

 568

 593

 401

 470

 362

 308

 312

 304

 341

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,584

 3,577

 3,571

 3,607

 3,735

 3,951

 4,180

 4,379

 4,621

 4,784

 4,923

 4,993

 5,027

 5,078

 5,095

 5,179

 5,300

 5,427

 5,577

 5,750

 5,930

 5,945

 6,020

 6,200

 6,204

 6,339

 6,392

 6,404

 6,458

 6,435

 6,398

 256

 256

 255

 258

 267

 282

 299

 313

 330

 342

 352

 357

 359

 363

 364

 370

 379

 388

 398

 411

 424

 425

 430

 443

 443

 453

 457

 457

 461

 460

 457

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 74-CC-561

#### Flink Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Flink Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES ANDERSON MILLER, a/k/a Sonny Miller,

a/k/a Bubba,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CR-90-60, CA-96-434-5-BR)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Potter,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-90-60;

CA-96-434-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### SUBCHAPTER I—LIBRARIES, LEARNING RESOURCES, EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION, AND SUPPORT
### §4081. Classification and treatment of prisoners

The Federal penal and correctional institutions shall be so planned and limited in size as to facilitate the development of an integrated system which will assure the proper classification and segregation of Federal prisoners according to the nature of the offenses committed, the character and mental condition of the prisoners, and such other factors as should be considered in providing an individualized system of discipline, care, and treatment of the persons committed to such institutions.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 850.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §907 (May 27, 1930, ch. 339, §7, 46 Stat. 390).

Language of section is so changed as to make one policy for all institutions, thus clarifying the manifest intent of Congress.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,184.78

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.80

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.79

 1,184.81

 1,184.84

 1,184.91

 1,184.93

 1,184.96

 1,185.04

 1,185.22

 1,185.39

 1,185.49

 1,185.58

 1,185.67

 1,185.73

 1,185.76

 1,185.80

 1,185.83

 1,185.87

 1,185.93

 1,185.98

 1,186.02

 1,186.07

 1,186.10

 27.99

 28.00

 28.00

 28.00

 28.02

 28.00

 28.00

 28.00

 28.00

 28.00

 28.03

 28.07

 28.15

 28.18

 28.22

 28.32

 28.55

 28.77

 28.90

 29.01

 29.13

 29.21

 29.24

 29.30

 29.33

 29.39

 29.46

 29.53

 29.58

 29.65

 29.69

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.03

+0.04

+0.09

+0.03

+0.04

+0.10

+0.23

+0.22

+0.13

+0.12

+0.12

+0.08

+0.04

+0.05

+0.04

+0.05

+0.08

+0.06

+0.05

+0.07

+0.04

CHANGE

4

10

3

4

9

-2

3

3

2

2

15

20

45

14

21

53

118

111

67

60

59

43

22

30

23

29

40

33

28

35

21

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 2

 2

 3

 2

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 3

 2

 3

 3

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .08

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .20

 .77

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/01/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.72 925 31 0 40 1.04 2.16

ACRE-FEET +1,720 1,835 61 0 79

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 61

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.16

JULY 1, 2009 3.88

 27.99
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,126
<INVENTORY>                                     20,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,293
<PP&E>                                         111,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,728
<BONDS>                                         39,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,945
<SALES>                                        509,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,543
<CGS>                                          330,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               127,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,671
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER I—BASIC PROGRAMS
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 33-57308, No. 33-59697, No. 333-36497 and No. 333-61816) ofAmeron International Corporation of our report dated February 4, 2004relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report toStockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 4,2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form10-K.

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|---------------------------------|
| Los Angeles,  California        |   |
| February 24,  2004         |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41137 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. HERMINIO BRISENO-LEMUS, also known as Herminio Briseno-Lemos Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-604-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Herminio BrisenoLemus (Briseno) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a bri ef in accordancewith Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Briseno has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF 

# RECEIVED SKY WEST AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. 2012-NM-060025 FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0292 

## JUN 1, 2015 HEARING DOCKET

COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FORAN EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.233(c)(l),by agreement oftbeparties, Complainant requests
anextension oftime to perfect its appeal and states the following in support: 1. On May 29,2015, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard C. Goodwin issued
an Initial Decision in the above-captioned matter. 2. OnJune 5, 2015, Complainant filed a timely Notice ofAppeal. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.233(c), Complainantmustperfect the appeal on or before July 18,2015, which is 50 days after the entry ofALI Goodwin's Initial Decision. 4. Complainant's counsel has conferred with Respondent's counsel and the parties have agreedto extendtbetime period for perfecting the appeal by 30 days. WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests the Decisionmaker grant an extension oftime until August 17, 2015 to perfect the appeal.
Respectfully submitted,Dated: June 19, 2015 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Telephone: (202) 267-5964 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served by personal delivery, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Request for an Extension ofTime in the matter ofSkyWest, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA2013-0292, addressed to: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 00 Washington, D.C., 20591 In addition, I hereby certifY that I served a copy ofthe same by U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, addressed to: Todd Emerson, Esq. Sky West Airlines 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 Counsel for Respondent By:



### BriMS~ Dated: June 19,2015
### §530. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Jan. 22, 1875, ch. 22, 18 Stat. 303, which provided for dismissal of proceedings, related to act June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §19, 18 Stat. 190, which was repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 989.