alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.08

 360.05

 360.08

 360.08

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.08

 360.08

 360.05

 360.05

 360.00

 360.08

 360.05

 360.05

 360.08

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.05

 360.08

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 543

 541

 543

 543

 541

 541

 541

 541

 543

 543

 541

 541

 537

 543

 541

 541

 543

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 541

 543

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+2

+0

-2

+0

+0

+0

+2

+0

-2

+0

-4

+6

-2

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

 25

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 321

 320

 324

 327

 317

 317

 324

 326

 316

 316

 321

 325

 318

 316

 317

 323

 330

 317

 316

 319

 322

 320

 317

 329

 362

 316

 315

 313

 318

 317

 316

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 14, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 9,955 50

ACRE-FEET +0 0 19,746 99

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 13,081

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 99

 32,926

 543

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 357

 356

 358

 356

 370

 381

 529

 612

 611

 610

 708

 802

 802

 802

 803

 804

 803

 787

 792

 794

 526

 351

 349

 336

 302

 285

 12

 285

 605

 784

 558

 16,830

 33,382

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 19,746

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 161

 262

 264

 267

 380

 440

 442

 442

 444

 445

 445

 445

 445

 445

 186

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 1

 293

 475

 268

 6,595

 13,081

RIVER CANALS
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael S. Hedge, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ForeFront Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

August 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael S. Hedge   
|Michael S. Hedge       
|Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
    By:
    
    /s/ Marvin RichardsonMarvin RichardsonChief Executive Officer and President
PUBLIC LAW 112–80—DEC. 23, 2011 125 STAT. 1297 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 384: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 112–97 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Dec. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 12, 13, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–80 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United 

States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER 

RESEARCH. 

Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Approved December 23, 2011. 

Dec. 23, 2011 

[S. 384] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 561

 556

 550

 547

 549

 547

 545

 545

 537

 535

 528

 528

 526

 527

 516

 517

 527

 554

 583

 584

 564

 525

 509

 511

 510

 521

 539

 557

 569

 550

 547

 541

 541

 538

 538

 536

 533

 533

 528

 522

 514

 510

 506

 500

 482

 472

 473

 471

 479

 480

 483

 485

 488

 491

 495

 496

 508

 506

 511

 515

 555

 549

 545

 543

 544

 540

 537

 538

 532

 528

 519

 514

 511

 507

 496

 486

 483

 490

 497

 502

 501

 495

 495

 499

 501

 506

 516

 521

 528

 526

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 359

 355

 353

 352

 352

 350

 348

 348

 345

 342

 337

 334

 332

 329

 323

 316

 314

 319

 323

 326

 326

 322

 322

 324

 326

 329

 335

 338

 342

 341

TOTAL 15,504

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.263 Determination of tax on beer.

If the certificate prescribed in § 26.205 covers beer, the beer tax will be collected at the rates imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5051.

(68A Stat. 611, as amended; 26 U.S.C. 5051, 7652)

[T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94201, Dec. 22, 2016]
### §483. Repealed. Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213, title V, §502, 68 Stat. 1140

Section, R.S. §3062; act Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title II, §208, 49 Stat. 526, related to forfeitures and penalty for aiding unlawful importation. See section 1595a of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 540 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louise and 
Bob Slaughter Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 2, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.
```
§ 395.8 Distribution and use of income from vending machines on Federal property. ( a ) Vending machine income from vending machines on Federal property which has been disbursed to the State licensing agency by a property managing department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States under § 395.32 shall accrue to each blind vendor operating a vending facility on such Federal property in each State in an amount not to exceed the average net income of the total number of blind vendors within such State, as determined each fiscal year on the basis of each prior year's operation, except that vending machine income shall not accrue to any blind vendor in any amount exceeding the average net income of the total number of blind vendors in the United States. No blind vendor shall receive less vending machine income than he was receiving during the calendar year prior to January 1, 1974, as a direct result of any limitation imposed on such income under this paragraph. No limitation shall be imposed on income from vending machines, combined to create a vending facility, when such facility is maintained, serviced, or operated by a blind vendor. Vending machine income disbursed by a property managing department, agency or instrumentality of the United States to a State licensing agency in excess of the amounts eligible to accrue to blind vendors in accordance with this paragraph shall be retained by the appropriate State licensing agency.
( b ) The State licensing agency shall disburse vending machine income to blind vendors within the State on at least a quarterly basis.
( c ) Vending machine income which is retained under paragraph (a) of this section by a State licensing agency shall be used by such agency for the establishment and maintenance of retirement or pension plans, for health insurance contributions, and for the provision of paid sick leave and vacation time for blind vendors in such State, if it is so determined by a majority vote of blind vendors licensed by the State licensing agency, after such agency has provided to each such vendor information on all matters relevant to such purposes. Any vending machine income not necessary for such purposes shall be used by the State licensing agency for the maintenance and replacement of equipment, the purchase of new equipment, management services, and assuring a fair minimum return to vendors. Any assessment charged to blind vendors by a State licensing agency shall be reduced pro rata in an amount equal to the total of such remaining vending machine income.
#### Stroud v. Commonwealth.

Oct. 13, 1942.

Wells Overbey for appellant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and Wm. F. Neill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*589Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

— Reversing.

Bnel Stroud was charged with trafficking in alcoholic beverages in Calloway County, which is local option territory, in violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Act of 1938. Acts 1938, Chapter 2. He was found guilty under that charge, in both- the quarterly court and the circuit court, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and six months in jail. He has moved this Court for an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court.

One of the grounds urged for a reversal is that a prosecution for a violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act can not be had in local option territory under the recent case of Wilson v. Goodin, 291 Ky. 144, 163 S. W. (2d) 309. The Commonwealth concedes that this contention is well grounded. One charged with trafficking in liquor in local option territory must be prosecuted under the local option law of 1936. KRS 242.010 to 242.990 (KS 2554c-1 to 2554c-34).

It follows, therefore, that the appeal should be and it is granted and the judgment is accordingly reversed.

Whole Court sitting.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Bruce Robinson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be
retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

| |  |                                                                                                            
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated:  May 6, 2005                                                                                        
| |  |                                                                                                            
| |  | /s/ J. Bruce RobinsonJ. Bruce Robinson
Chairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer of
Zygo Corporation

I, Walter A. Shephard, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be
retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

| |  |                                                                                                              
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Dated:  May 6, 2005                                                                                          
| |  |                                                                                                              
| |  | /s/ Walter A. ShephardWalter A. Shephard
Vice President, Finance,
Chief Financial Officer of
Zygo Corporation
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oscar Haines, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael M.
Vehlies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |                                                   | 
| | ------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Dated:
February 9, 2011                          
| |                                                   | 
| | /s/ Michael
M. Vehlies                            | 
| |                                                   | 
| | Michael M.
Vehlies                               
| | Corporate
Controller                             
| | (principal
financial officer) of
Zygo Corporation

---
- 283 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 302 N ebraska 

### R eports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v . D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283



### U

. S

. S pe c ialty 

### I n sura nc e 

### C ompa n y 

### , a c orporatio n 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . D S A vio n i c s 

### U n limited 

### LL C, appella n t



### .

___ N.W.2d ___ Filed February 15, 2019. No. S-17-1101.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: S helly 

### R

. S tratma n 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Thomas M. Locher, of Locher, Pavelka, Dostal, Braddy & Hammes, L.L.C., for appellant. Robert E. O’Connor, Jr., for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , and P

apik 

### , JJ., and J oh n so n 

### , District Judge

.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on motions for rehearing filed by the appellant, D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, and the appellee, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, concerning our opinion in U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics

. 1 

### We overrule the motions, but we modify the opinion as follows:

1 U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics , 301 Neb. 388, 918 N.W.2d 589

(2018). Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/15/2019 08:05 AM CST- 284 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 302 N ebraska 

### R eports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v . D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283 

### In the “Declaratory Judgment Was Premature” subsection, we strike the third sentence of the first paragraph, including footnote 14. 2 

### Also in the same subsection, after the fourth sentence of the second paragraph, 3 

### we insert the following sen

tence: “‘This rule embraces not only cases where the identi

cal issues between the same parties are sub judice , but also possibly cases in which the issues only are identical but not the parties.’” 4 

### The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modi f ied



### . M otio n s f or reheari n g overruled



### .

2 Id . at 398, 918 N.W.2d at 596.
3 Id . at 399, 918 N.W.2d at 596.
4 Strawn v. County of Sarpy , 146 Neb. 783, 788, 21 N.W.2d 597, 600

(1946).
### §2547. Consultations with representatives of domestic interests

In carrying out the functions for which responsible under this subchapter, the Trade Representative and the Secretary concerned shall solicit technical and policy advice from the committees, established under section 2155 of this title, that represent the interests concerned, and may solicit advice from appropriate State agencies and private persons.

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §417, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 247; Pub. L. 103–182, title III, §351(b)(2)(A), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2122; Pub. L. 104–295, §21(b)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3529.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–295 amended directory language of Pub. L. 103–182. See 1993 Amendment note below.

1993—Pub. L. 103–182, as amended by Pub. L. 104–295, substituted "Trade Representative" for "Special Representative".
Exhibit 21.1

 

Impco Technologies, Inc. 

Subsidiaries of Impco Technologies, Inc., a corporation organized and 

existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of 

Delaware. 

 

Impco Technologies Pty. Ltd 

Impco Technologies (SA) Pty. Ltd 

ImpcoTechnologies (NSW) Pty. Ltd 

Impco Technologies Fuel Systems Pty, Ltd. 

Impco Technologies Japan, KK 

Grupo IMPCO Mexicano 

IMPCO Beru Technologies B.V. 

IMPCO-BeruTehnologies, GmbH 

IMPCO-Beru Technologies, S.a.r.l. 

IMPCO Technologies, Ltd. 

Minda Impco Technologies, Ltd. 

Minda Impco Ltd. 

CNGC-IMPCO Technologies, LLC