alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > History of Wages in the United States From Colonial Times to 1928

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					,	Stewart, Estelle M., 1887-1938					 and 	Bowen, Jesse Chester, 1865-1948. 						*History of Wages in the United States From Colonial Times to 1928 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 499*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										October 1929,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4067,			accessed on September 7, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 491.37

 490.94

 490.51

 490.51

 490.33

 489.30

 488.50

 487.31

 485.88

 484.42

 483.10

 481.49

 479.89

 479.13

 478.51

 477.82

 477.55

 477.35

 477.07

 476.80

 476.54

 476.25

 475.91

 475.67

 476.02

 476.13

 476.09

 476.10

 475.84

 475.55

 475.22

 1,409,785

 1,404,966

 1,400,152

 1,400,152

 1,398,138

 1,386,636

 1,377,724

 1,364,503

 1,348,672

 1,332,574

 1,318,075

 1,300,462

 1,283,037

 1,274,788

 1,268,071

 1,260,610

 1,257,694

 1,255,536

 1,252,517

 1,249,607

 1,246,808

 1,243,688

 1,240,012

 1,237,437

 1,241,215

 1,242,397

 1,241,967

 1,242,075

 1,239,261

 1,236,150

 1,232,614

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,264

 0

 0

 0

 5,870

 4,443

 4,474

 0

 2,601

 2,643

 2,571

 2,524

 3,489

 7,623

 4,458

 6,152

 5,098

 1,754

 1,441

 3,821

 1,627

 1,228

 1,221

 1,222

 1,140

 1,138

 2,004

 2,032

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,147

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2019 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -186,152 71,721 14,886 -95,991

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-8,981

-4,819

-4,814

 0

-2,014

-11,502

-8,912

-13,221

-15,831

-16,098

-14,499

-17,613

-17,425

-8,249

-6,717

-7,461

-2,916

-2,158

-3,019

-2,910

-2,799

-3,120

-3,676

-2,575

 3,778

 1,182

-430

 108

-2,814

-3,111

-3,536

 498

 514

 520

 454

 479

 493

 488

 506

 485

 487

 439

 473

 491

 502

 499

 481

 458

 556

 473

 423

 419

 437

 420

 473

 450

 478

 488

 498

 479

 444

 581

-6,397

-4,971

-5,012

-6,780

-4,184

-3,059

-3,116

-2,984

-3,857

-7,985

-4,785

-6,395

-5,313

-2,254

-1,842

-4,433

-2,193

-2,616

-2,430

-2,894

-1,570

-1,723

-2,496

-2,586

-918

-578

-462

474

-538

-1,585

-509

ELEV STORAGE

 1,264

 574,667

 569,696

 564,684

 557,904

 553,720

 550,661

 547,545

 544,561

 540,704

 532,719

 527,934

 521,539

 516,226

 513,972

 512,130

 507,697

 505,504

 502,888

 500,458

 497,564

 495,994

 494,271

 491,775

 489,189

 488,271

 487,693

 487,231

 487,705

 487,167

 485,582

 485,073

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 581,064

0

0

0

-5,800

-1,500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-650

-650

-650

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-9,250
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.53

                                 AMENDMENT TO
                             THE WHEELABRATOR-RUST
                           SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN


     The Wheelabrator-Rust Supplemental Benefit Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

     1.   Section 3.2 is hereby amended to add a new paragraph at the end
thereof to read as follows:

          "Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.2,
     a Participant who is employed by the Johnson Screens, Wheelabrator
     Corporation and Water Process (including the HPD, CPC Engineering, Wiesmann
     and Memtek business lines) divisions of Wheelabrator Water Technologies
     Inc. (collectively the "WWTI Entities"), and Westates Carbon-Arizona, Inc.,
     Wheelabrator Water Technologies International Holdings, Inc., and
     Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems Inc. (collectively the "WWTI Subsidiaries")
     on the closing date of the sale of the WWTI Entities and the WWTI
     Subsidiaries to United States Filter Corporation ("U.S. Filter
     Transaction") shall become fully vested in his or her Account balances."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tekelec (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William H. Everett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                              | 
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. | 



|/s/ William H. Everett
                       William H. Everett
                        Executive Vice President and
                      Chief Financial Officer
                      February 26, 2009 | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5385 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5385

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize the Attorney General to make grants to States and units of 
local government to deploy and implement gunfire detection and location 
                  technology, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2019

 Ms. Kelly of Illinois (for herself and Mr. Sensenbrenner) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize the Attorney General to make grants to States and units of 
local government to deploy and implement gunfire detection and location 
                  technology, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GUNFIRE DETECTION TECHNOLOGY GRANT PROGRAM.

    Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 
is amended by inserting after part NN the following:

         ``PART OO--GUNFIRE DETECTION TECHNOLOGY GRANT PROGRAM

``SEC. 3051. GRANT AUTHORITY.

    ``The Attorney General is authorized to make grants to States and 
units of local government to deploy and implement gunfire detection and 
location technology.

``SEC. 3052. APPLICATIONS.

    ``The chief executive officer of a State or unit of local 
government seeking a grant under this part shall submit to the Attorney 
General an application at such time, in such manner, and containing 
such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

``SEC. 3053. FUNDING.

    ``Of the total amount made available to carry out subpart 1 of part 
E, the Attorney General shall allocate not less than $10,000,000 for 
grants under this part for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2023.''.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Section 505(a)(1) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10156(a)(1)) is amended by inserting after 
``paragraph (2)'' the following: ``and section 3053''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.82

 359.83

 359.82

 359.83

 359.82

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.82

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.80

 359.79

 359.80

 524

 525

 524

 525

 524

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 524

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 523

 522

 523

STORAGE

+0

+1

-1

+1

-1

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

CHANGE

 418

 488

 410

 450

 466

 486

 411

 441

 384

 403

 402

 381

 378

 356

 385

 410

 434

 464

 423

 436

 327

 253

 329

 367

 423

 421

 400

 295

 320

 361

 401

 252

 251

 254

 255

 252

 251

 255

 251

 255

 253

 255

 252

 251

 254

 254

 255

 253

 253

 254

 253

 255

 250

 254

 235

 228

 227

 228

 229

 226

 228

 228

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2022 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2022

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1 0 7,651 12,323

ACRE-FEET -1 0 15,176 24,443

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 51,672

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 24,443

 91,291

 524

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,517

 1,618

 1,584

 1,625

 1,628

 1,601

 1,501

 1,495

 1,428

 1,448

 1,448

 1,469

 1,508

 1,449

 1,530

 1,531

 1,575

 1,545

 1,503

 1,513

 1,390

 1,292

 1,365

 1,313

 1,373

 1,336

 1,331

 1,231

 1,216

 1,215

 1,266

 44,844

 88,948

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 15,176

 886

 908

 961

 961

 952

 901

 880

 842

 829

 830

 831

 876

 920

 879

 932

 908

 926

 863

 865

 860

 847

 828

 821

 746

 758

 722

 739

 744

 707

 658

 671

 26,051

 51,672

RIVER CANALS
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45771

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

OLIVIA MERCADO MUNOZ ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: August 14, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Cassia County. Hon. Michael P. Tribe , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion

, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER C U RIAM

Olivia Mercado Munoz pleaded guilty to felony fraudulent procurement of public

assistance , Idaho Code § 56

- 227(1) . The district court imposed a unified ten

- year sentence, with
two years determinate and retained jurisdiction. Following Munoz’s period of retained
jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and executed the underlying sentence.

Munoz filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. Munoz appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

prese nting an I.C.R. 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of2 new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007 ). An appeal from the
denial of an I.C.R. 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence
absent the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in
support of Munoz ’s I.C.R. 35 motion was prese nted, the district court did not abuse its
discretion. For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s order denying Munoz ’s I.C.R. 35

motion is affirmed.
!""# 

 $%&	'!

												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 
(%& 												 	 												



)
	
*	+	 



,% 



 



		 



												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 $%				 												





	


+
	,++	 	%	(	&		,&	'-*		.$	%	,%	/&	0/	%

.%%	%1	2%	3,%4	(1	/&55			0	*	6&	23,%4*		7

&8.	(1	%	,%		.0	/&	%	
(%&9		

:;< 	 <

+
< 	<)* 	 % 	 $$&8 	 % 	 % 	 .&% 	 %% 	 % 	%% 	 %

,%	.0	(	8&%*		$&%*9	%	*	&801*	





 %%	.%%	%1		&(1	/	%

$&	%%	00	/.	(8	0		%	8&%		/	/&55			0	((*

		='->> 	$8		%	%&/0	.%1	=&0	
%&%	.&%	00	(

&%%	%	%	$%&	'!	+&.%		%	9		%	

6			2?	!-'	

	@	;$*	;	

;	<	A	B-	

*	&8	!'- B-	

+0$	2->	B CB

	


Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 22 Filed 03/31/20 Entered 03/31/20 14:38:21 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
	 ):+	<

	%%	%	$%&	'!	+&.%	00	&%	.	/.	.%0	.

%		%	$%&	'!	;0		/&*	%	7	%	%	/.	00	(	&%%	%	%	
(%&9

	%	

):+	<

	%%		%	%		&&		%&	18	/&%	/	%


(%&D	$%&	'!	;0*	%	+&.%	00	&%	%	/.	%	%	,%9		%	

):+	<

	%%*	.(E%	%	%	 /&88	%&*	%	.%%	%1	/	''

:	F	!#2	00	&		/.00	/&		//%	7%.%	%		%	
(%&*	&	$&$&%1*

00	&%&*		$&$&%1	/	%	(5&.$%1	%%	%&.8.%	%	$1	/	%	


%	GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG	

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

:	5&.$%1	6.8	

%&		
5%	GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG	

;+
	H	

	 	 II	 	 6									 	 												

6			2?	!-'	

	@	;$*	;	

;	<	A	B-	

*	&8	!'- B-	

+0$	2->	B CB

	




Mar 30 2020

/s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Mar 31 2020

Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 22 Filed 03/31/20 Entered 03/31/20 14:38:21 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4


	 	 II	.J			 													 	 												

.J		*	$%&	'!	+&.%

"	=0	)&%	
&*	.%	

*		!#

2->	""B C"C





;.&.% 	 % 	 0 	 .0 	 C '2* 	 
 	 &(1 	 &%/1 	 %% 	 00 	 &1 	 $&% 	 

&	%	(	&&	

	 	 II6			

.0	/&	
(%&

!

Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 22 Filed 03/31/20 Entered 03/31/20 14:38:21 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
 
!" #

6		*	K.&

	@	;$*	;	

;	<	A	B-	

*	&8	!'- B-

.J		*	K.&	

$%&	'!	+&.%	

"	=0	)&%	
&

.%	

*		!#

/&55	

0	*	6&

-'-	+%%&%	+&0

*			!!"

>

Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 22 Filed 03/31/20 Entered 03/31/20 14:38:21 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
#### Ulster and Delaware Bluestone Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry 

Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/10/2013 05:31 PM

Subject: RE: RICE Interagency Comments -- PRA

Hi Melanie,

I also want to flag for you that tomorrow (unless you can draft text before our call) 

we’ll need to discuss the PRA

section of the preamble, inserted below. While the burden for the new reporting 

requirement would occur beyond

the first ICR approval, you still need to discuss the burden associated with the added 

provision. This goes hand in

hand with the comment made in the RIA. You should provide your best estimate of what the 

annual burden will be,

once the provision starts. I understand there’s a great deal of certainty surrounding the 

estimate, but in 3 years, EPA

will need to generate the burden estimate of the reporting requirement for the renewal 

ICR with no better data

than they have now.

As discussed in this preamble to this final action, there are

reporting requirements that will begin in 2016. Owners and

operators of emergency stationary engines that operate or are

contractually obligated to be available for more than 15 hours

per year for emergency demand response must document their

operation in annual reports to the EPA. These reports are

necessary to enable EPA or States to identify affected

facilities that may not be in compliance with the

requirements. The burden of this reporting requirement is not

included in the ICR burden estimate because it is after the

first 3 years after which sources must begin complying with

the rule. The reporting burden beginning in 2016 would only be

included starting with the first ICR renewal.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

From: Higgins, Cortney

Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:14 PM

To: 'King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: 'Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov)'; 'VanLare.Paula@epamail.epa.gov';

'sorrels.larry@epa.gov'

Subject: RE: RICE Interagency Comments -- CI RIA

Hi Melanie,

One follow up comment on this:

It appears that EPA has made some changes to the CI RIA. However, none of those changes

relate to our comment about updating the inventory numbers for irrigation engines. EPA’s

previous comment that they are not changing anything that would relate to any of those 

engines

is also false, as the changes they have made for the San Joaquin Valley engines do impact 

engines

in the affected categories.

Can we talk about this tomorrow?

Thanks,

Cortne

From: Higgins, Cortney

Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:47 PM

To: 'King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov'

Cc: Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov); 'VanLare.Paula@epamail.epa.gov';
sorrels.larry@epa.gov

Subject: RICE Interagency Comments -- CI RIA

Hi all,

Attached are comments on the CI RIA – please let me know if you have any questions. We 

had no questions about

the revised SI RIA.

Regards,

Cortney
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.52


                                 AMENDMENT TO
                             THE WHEELABRATOR-RUST
                           SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN


     The Wheelabrator-Rust Supplemental Benefit Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

     1.   Section 3.2 is hereby amended to add a new paragraph at the end
thereof to read as follows:

          "Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.2,
     a Participant who was employed by the engineering, design, procurement,
     construction, construction management and plant operation and maintenance
     services and other businesses operated by Rust Engineering & Construction
     Inc., certain of its subsidiaries and the Rust Engineering Company of New
     York, Inc. (collectively "Rust E&C") on May 20, 1996, whose participation
     in the Plan terminated due to the sale of certain assets of Rust E&C to
     Raytheon Engineers & Constructors, Inc. ("Raytheon") (the "Raytheon
     Transaction") and who became employed by Raytheon or one of its affiliates
     immediately following the closing of the Raytheon Transaction shall become
     fully vested in his or her Account balances."
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.94 Statement of process. ( a ) Manufacturers shall submit a statement of process on Form 5150.19, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, covering the following activities: ( 1 ) If specially denatured spirits are used for laboratory or mechanical purposes, other than use of S.D.A. Formula No. 3-A, 3-C, or 30 for laboratory or mechanical purposes not in the development of a product;
( 2 ) If specially denatured spirits are used in a manufacturing process in which none of the specially denatured spirits remains in the finished product;
( 3 ) If specially denatured spirits, completely denatured alcohol, or articles are used in a manufacturing process and are to be recovered; or
( 4 ) If recovered denatured spirits are to be redenatured.
( b ) The manufacturer shall submit a separate Form 5150.19 for each activity described in paragraph (a) of this section describing the process completely. ( 1 ) If specially denatured spirits are used for laboratory or mechanical purposes, other than use of S.D.A. Formula No. 3-A, 3-C, or 30 for laboratory or mechanical purposes not in the development of a product, the Form 5150.19 shall identify the formula number of specially denatured spirits, a description of the laboratory or mechanical use, and the approximate annual quantity to be used.
( 2 ) If the Form 5150.19 is submitted covering activities described in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(4) of this section, the Form 5150.19 shall also contain the following information: ( i ) Flow diagrams shall be submitted with the Form 5150.19 clearly depicting the equipment in its relative operating sequence, with essential connecting pipelines and valves. All major equipment shall be identified as to its use. The direction of flow through the pipelines shall be indicated in the flow diagram. The flow diagram, shall be accompanied by a written description of the flow of materials through the system.
( ii ) The statement of process shall describe the chemical composition of the recovered spirits. The statement of process shall be accompanied by a statement of the intended use of the recovered spirits.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-5116

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 07-CV-0374, Judge Margaret M. Sweeney.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JEFFERSON B. SLAGLE, Thompson & Slagle, LLC, of 

John’s Creek, Georgia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On 

the brief was DEWITTE THOMPSON. 

MICHAEL D. AUSTIN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department 

of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondentappellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, 

Assistant Attorney General, BRYANT SNEE, Acting Director, and DONALD E. KINNER, Assistant Director.
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 4, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court