alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3






	
	
	Exhibit 10.3






AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO THE ADVANCED EMISSIONS SOLUTIONS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 


     The Board of Directors of  Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby adopts the following Amendment No. 4 (this “Amendment”) to the Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2007 Plan”), effective as of the date the shareholders approve the Amendment at the Company’s next Annual Meeting. 


     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend Section 6(f) of the 2007 Plan to increase the individual award limits. 


      NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company hereby amends the 2007 Plan as follows:


1.  Section 6(f) of the2007 Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following language is hereby added as the entirety of Section 6(f) of the 2007 Plan:


“(f)    Individual Award Limits. Following the date that the exemption from application of Section 162(m) of the Code described in Section 18 (or any exemption having similar effect) ceases to apply to Awards, the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Awards (including awards for Options or Restricted Stock) may be granted to any Grantee in any fiscal year of the Company shall be four hundred thousand (400,000) Shares; provided, however, that Non-Management Directors shall be entitled to receive Awards in any fiscal year for no more than fifty thousand (50,000) Shares. In connection with a Grantee’s commencement of Continuous Service, a Grantee who is an Employee may be granted Options for up to an additional one hundred thousand (100,000) Shares which shall not count against the limit set forth in the previous sentence. The foregoing limitations shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 10 below. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder, in applying the foregoing limitations with respect to a Grantee, if any Option is canceled, the canceled Option shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options may be granted to the Grantee. For this purpose, the repricing of an Option shall be treated as the cancellation of the existing Option and the grant of a new Option.


2.  Except as set forth in this Amendment, the 2007 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
     The undersigned, being the General Counsel and Secretary of Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Amendment, as adopted by the Board of Directors on June 5, 2015, and as adopted by the stockholders on _________________.
	
		
	 
	Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc.






	
		
	 
	By:    /s/ Christine B. Amrhein                                    .
Christine B. Amrhein, General Counsel and Secretary
### §4315. Consultations with respect to mutual recognition arrangements

#### (a) Consultations

The Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to any proposed mutual recognition arrangement or similar agreement between the United States and a foreign government providing for mutual recognition of supply chain security programs and customs revenue functions, shall consult with the appropriate congressional committees—

(1) not later than 30 days before initiating negotiations to enter into any such arrangement or similar agreement; and

(2) not later than 30 days before entering into any such arrangement or similar agreement.

#### (b) Negotiating objective

It shall be a negotiating objective of the United States in any negotiation for a mutual recognition arrangement or similar agreement with a foreign country on partnership programs, such as the Customs–Trade Partnership Against Terrorism established under subtitle B of title II of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 961 et seq.), to seek to ensure the compatibility of the partnership programs of that country with the partnership programs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enhance security, trade facilitation, and trade enforcement.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title I, §108, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 135.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 109–347, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1884, also known as the SAFE Port Act. Subtitle B of title II of the Act is classified generally to part B (§961 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 3 of Title 6, Domestic Security. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 901 of Title 6 and Tables.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.33 Time of destruction of marks and brands. ( a ) Any person who empties a package containing denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum, or articles made from denatured alcohol or specially denatured rum shall immediately destroy or obliterate the marks, brands, and labels required by this chapter to be placed on packages containing those materials.
( b ) A person may not destroy or obliterate the marks, brands or labels until the package or drum has been emptied.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1358, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5206))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         134,442
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,442
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,888
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,054,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,442
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,392)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,392)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth Baggerly, Respondent, *v.*The Farmers’ Joint Stock Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Argued November 22, 1877;

decided January 22, 1878.)

*D. Pratt*for appellant.

*H. L. Comstock*for respondent.

Earl, J.,

reads for reversal and now trial; Rapallo, J., concurs on first ground; Andrews, J., concurs in result; Church, Ch. J., Allen and Miller, JJ., agree to affirm without opinion ; Folger, J., concurs on authority of *Owen*v. *F. J. S. Ins. Co.*(57 Barb., 518, affirmed in Court of Appeals, but not reported). .

J udgment affirmed.
### §4403. Honey transshipment

#### (a) In general

The Commissioner shall direct appropriate personnel and the use of resources of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to address concerns that honey is being imported into the United States in violation of the customs and trade laws of the United States.

#### (b) Country of origin

#### (1) In general

The Commissioner shall compile a database of the individual characteristics of honey produced in foreign countries to facilitate the verification of country of origin markings of imported honey.

#### (2) Engagement with foreign governments

The Commissioner shall seek to engage the customs agencies of foreign governments for assistance in compiling the database described in paragraph (1).

#### (3) Consultation with industry

In compiling the database described in paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall consult with entities in the honey industry regarding the development of industry standards for honey identification.

#### (4) Consultation with Food and Drug Administration

In compiling the database described in paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall consult with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

#### (c) Report required

Not later than 180 days after February 24, 2016, the Commissioner shall submit to Congress a report that—

(1) describes and assesses the limitations in the existing analysis capabilities of laboratories with respect to determining the country of origin of honey samples or the percentage of honey contained in a sample; and

(2) includes any recommendations of the Commissioner for improving such capabilities.

#### (d) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the Commissioner of Food and Drugs should promptly establish a national standard of identity for honey for the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use to ensure that imports of honey are—

(1) classified accurately for purposes of assessing duties; and

(2) denied entry into the United States if such imports pose a threat to the health or safety of consumers in the United States.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title VI, §608, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 189.)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports to the Stockholders of Wheelabrator Technologies Inc., incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K/A and into the registrant's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (registration nos. 33-31523, 33-13720, 33-
47989, 33-48837, 33-62281 and 33-64431) and into the registrant's previously
filed Registration Statement on Form S-4 (registration no. 33-36118) and into
the registrant's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3
(registration no. 33-59606).


                                       /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                       -----------------------
                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


New York, New York
February 25, 1998
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to Remsen Avenue from Utica Avenue to Carnarsie Bay Park, etc.

(Appeal No. 1.)

—Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  Certification
    Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  10-K
      By:
    /s/  Ben
    Harper  Senior Vice President  Finance
 and Secretary/Treasurer
EXHIBIT 3.8
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT
OF
CAPITAL MEDICAL CENTER PARTNER, LLC
   ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
      3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
   5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  9




---



##### 



18th August
 HTI HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., Sole MemberBy:
    /s/ Dora A. BlackwoodDora A. BlackwoodVice President 10
### subpart 4—general provisions for state operated programs
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.88

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.90

 359.89

 359.89

 359.90

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 359.89

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 530

 529

 529

 530

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

 529

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

-1

+0

+1

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 387

 371

 402

 431

 447

 422

 410

 379

 346

 387

 410

 413

 451

 466

 463

 415

 410

 442

 461

 452

 452

 401

 320

 358

 374

 438

 471

 487

 472

 450

 415

 304

 304

 302

 302

 305

 303

 304

 303

 303

 302

 302

 303

 303

 303

 304

 305

 303

 305

 305

 302

 304

 303

 301

 304

 302

 300

 303

 301

 307

 306

 302

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2018

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 0 9,400 13,003

ACRE-FEET +0 0 18,645 25,791

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 56,343

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 25,791

 100,779

 529

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 1,515

 1,524

 1,559

 1,602

 1,603

 1,549

 1,539

 1,510

 1,512

 1,577

 1,606

 1,596

 1,643

 1,682

 1,683

 880

 1,634

 1,674

 1,708

 1,714

 1,709

 1,642

 1,559

 1,582

 1,565

 1,652

 1,777

 1,845

 1,796

 1,756

 1,692

 49,885

 98,947

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 18,645

 839

 850

 869

 876

 874

 859

 859

 859

 891

 908

 908

 876

 887

 915

 926

 921

 947

 948

 955

 962

 946

 935

 932

 923

 889

 909

 976

 1,024

 986

 988

 969

 28,406

 56,343

RIVER CANALS
(No. 6854

#### Jacqueline Bynum, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 15, 1973.*

Kleiman, Cornfield and Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.123 Pyronate. Pyronate is a product of the destructive distillation of hardwood meeting the following requirements: ( a ) *Acidity (as acetic acid).* Not more than 0.1 percent by weight, determined as follows: Add 5.0 mL sample to 100 mL distilled water in an Erlenmeyer flask and titrate with 0.1 N NaOH to a bromthymol blue endpoint.
( b ) *Color.* The color shall be no darker than the color produced by 2.0 grams of potassium dichromate in 1 liter of water. The comparision shall be made in 4-ounce oil sample bottles viewed crosswise.
( c ) *Distillation range.* When 100 mL are distilled not more than 5 mL shall distill below 70 °C., not less than 50 mL below 160 °C., and not less than 90 mL below 205 °C.
Note.
Any material submitted as pyronate must agree in color, odor, taste and denaturing value with a standard sample furnished by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau to chemists authorized to examine samples of denaturants.
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]
§ 19.674 TTB action on small plant applications. ( a ) *Notice of receipt.* Within 15 days of receipt of an application for a small plant permit, the appropriate TTB officer will send a written notice of receipt to the applicant. The notice will include a statement as to whether the application meets the requirements of § 19.673. If the application does not meet the requirements of § 19.673, the appropriate TTB officer will return the application to the applicant, and a new 15-day period will commence upon receipt of an amended or corrected application.
( b ) *Action on application.* Within 45 days from the date that the appropriate TTB officer sent the applicant a notice of receipt of a completed application for a small plant permit, the appropriate TTB officer will either issue the permit or give notice in writing to the applicant stating in detail the reason that a permit will not be issued. Denial of an application will not prejudice any later application for a permit by the same applicant.
( c ) *Failure to give notice.* If the notice of receipt required by paragraph (a) is not sent, and the applicant has a receipt indicating that the appropriate TTB officer received the application, the 45-day period provided for in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section will commence on the fifteenth day after the date the appropriate TTB officer received the application.
( d ) *Presumption of approval.* If, within 45 days from the date of the notice to the applicant of receipt of a completed application for a small plant permit, the appropriate TTB officer has not notified the applicant of issuance of the permit or denial of the application, the application will be deemed approved and the applicant may proceed as if a permit had been issued.
( e ) *Limitation.* The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section apply only to the first application submitted for any one small plant in any calendar quarter and to an amended or corrected first application.
(26 U.S.C. 5181)
### SERVED: MARCH 14, 2016


### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF AIRAMBULANCE BYAIR TREK, INC. 

### DOCKET NO. F AA-2011-1003 (Civil Penalty Action)


### ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJUDGE DISMISSING PROCEEDING WITHPREJUDICE By notice served March 

### 2, 2016, Respondent states that ''the parties have agreed to a resolution ofthis matter" and that it "hereby withdraws its request for a hearing inthis matter." 1 Accordingly, pursuantto Rule 

### 215,2 this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. The 

### FAA shall sendthe Judge and the Docket a copy ofany compromise order or

### final order assessing civil penalty. 

### SO ORDERED.

Attachment-Service List

1 Doc. No. 18, FDMS No. FAA-2011-1003, Respondent's Notice ofWithdrawal ofHearing Request at 1, available athttp://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2011-1003-0018. 2 Rule 215 provides: "At anytime before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or a party may withdraw a request for a hearing withoutthe consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing andthe answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpartwith prejudice." 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 (2015), available athttps://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2015-title14-voll/pdf/CFR-2015- titlel4-voll-partl3.pdf.

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY



### Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building

- Suite 2W10003 ONE COPY 

### Gregory S. Winton, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

### The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAX: 301-294-2525 Christian L. 

### Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Eastern Region, AEA-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza, Room 561 Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3273 EMAIL: Christian.Lewerenz@faa.gov Matthew J. Zappala, Complainant's Counsel 

### DocketNo. FAA-2011-1003 (Civil Penalty Action)

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, Enforcement Division, Northeast Team Federal Aviation Administration 1200 District Avenue
· Burlington, MA 01803

TEL: 781-238-7046 EMAIL: Matthew.Zappala@faa.gov The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative LawJudge 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 

### FAX: 202-366-7536

3 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
### SUBCHAPTER II—APPROPRIATIONS AND EVALUATIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 92–318, title III, §301(a)(1), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 326, redesignated subchapter I as II. Former subchapter II redesignated III.

Pub. L. 91–230, title IV, §401(a)(10), Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 166, added subchapter II heading.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.231 Return.

A permittee may, following the receipt of specially denatured spirits and for any legitimate reason, return the specially denatured spirits to any distilled spirits plant or dealer if the consignee consents to the shipment. The consignor shall prepare a record of shipment in accordance with § 20.171.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0062)

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
#### J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, et al, Appellants, v. W. C. WELSH, AS DIRECTOR OF TAXATION, et al, Respondents.

(269 N. W. 860.)

(File No. 7898.

Opinion filed November 16, 1936.)

*Hitchcock & Sickel,*of Mitchell, for Appellants.

*Walter Conway,*Atty. Gen., and *R. R. D'rewfy,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for Respondents.

PER CURjIAM.

This appeal involves the same questions as were presented in -the case of Barnsdall Refining Corporation v. Welch 64 S. D. 647, 209 N. W. 853 this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the order appealed from is reversed.

All the Judges concur.
#### The People ex rel. James McKone, Appellants, v. Andrew H. Green, Comptroller, etc., et al., Respondents.

This case presented the same questions, and was argued and decided with *People ex rel. Lunney*v. *Campbell (ante,*p. 496).
### [§1718. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–647, title XII, §1210(c), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4832]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 782; Aug. 12, 1970, Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(28), 84 Stat. 780, provided that libelous matter on wrappers or envelopes was nonmailable.