alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 19.353 Bottling tank gauge.

When a distilled spirits product is to be bottled or packaged, the proprietor must gauge the product after any filtering, reduction, or other treatment, and before bottling or packaging begins. The gauge must be made at labeling or package marking proof, subject to variations in accordance with the tolerances set forth in § 19.356(c); however, the actual measurement of the gauge must be entered on the bottling and packaging record required in § 19.599.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)

[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-158, 86 FR 18726, Apr. 2, 2020; 85 FR 20424, Apr. 13, 2020]
§ 19.393 Restoration and redenaturation of recovered denatured spirits and recovered articles. ( a ) *Recovered denatured spirits and articles.* A proprietor may receive recovered denatured spirits and recovered articles on bonded premises for restoration (including redistillation, if necessary), or redenaturation, or both, as provided in subpart Q of this part. However, the proprietor may not withdraw the spirits from bonded premises except for industrial use or after redenaturation.
( b ) *Spirits or articles retaining some denaturants.* If recovered denatured spirits or recovered articles are to be redenatured and do not require the full amount of denaturants for redenaturation, the proprietor must make an entry to that effect in the record of denaturation required by § 19.606(b).
(26 U.S.C. 5242)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Allan L. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Allan L. Schwartz
                                  ---------------------
                                  Allan L. Schwartz
                                  Executive Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  June 7, 2005
#### Stephen Bastable, Respondent, *v.*The City of Syracuse, Appellant.

To authorize an appeal to this court in a case where the judgment is less than §500, there must be an order of General Term, as prescribed by the act of 1874 (chap. 322, Laws of 1874), stating that the case involves some question of law which ought to be reviewed here. An order simply giving leave to appeal, without assigning any cause for so doing, • is insufficient,

A reference to an opinion in an action, as reported in the Supreme Court Reports, is not a substitute for a compliance with the rule of this court (rule 5) requiring the printing in a case of any opinion of the court below.

(Submitted December 4,1877 j

decided January 15, 1878.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of "the Supreme Court, iu the fourth judicial department, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. (Reported below, 8 Hun, 587.)

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, by reason of the wrongful diversion and conducting upon plaintiff’s premises of surface water, by defendant in grading its streets.

Plaintiff obtained judgment for $328.42. Upon affirmance by the General Term, an order was granted giving the defendant leave to appeal to this court, without stating, however, that the case involved some question of law which ought to be reviewed here. The opinion of General Term was not printed in the case.

*M. A. Knapp,*for appellant.

*Geo. K.*Collins, for respondent.

Per *Curiam.*

We think this case probably falls within

the principle of *Byrnes*v. *The City of Cohoes*(67 N. Y., 204). But it does not come before us in such form that we can review it. The judgment being for less than $500, an *65order of the General Term was necessary to authorize an appeal to this court. The form of such order is prescribed by the act of 1874, chapter 322. That act requires that the General Term should make an order stating that the case involves some question of law which ought to be reviewed in this court. The order of the General Term in the present case contains no such statement.. It simply gives leave to the defendant to appeal without assigning any cause for so doing. It therefore is not a compliance with the act of 1874.

There is a further irregularity in this case, by which the court has frequently been inconvenienced in other cases, and to which it has several times called the attention of counsel — that is, the omission to print the opinion of the court below, as required by the rule of this court. Instead of printing the opinion, reference is made to it in the points as reported in the Supreme Court Reports. For several reasons this is not a substitute for a compliance with the rule. The court is deprived of the opportunity to refer conveniently to the opinion during the argument, and is otherwise put to needless trouble. The rule requiring the opinion to be printed in the case is of long-standing and well known to the bar, and should be observed.

For these reasons the appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

All concur, except Church, Ch. J., absent.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 24.267 Losses in transit.

Where the loss in transit of bulk wine shipped in bond or the total daily bulk wine in bond shipments received in bond from the same winery exceeds one percent (two percent on transcontinental shipments) of the volume shipped, the proprietor of the receiving bonded wine premises shall immediately notify the appropriate TTB officer and file a claim under the provisions of § 24.65.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5370))

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0492)

[T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13685, Mar. 22, 1999]
#### Peter S. Wansy, Respondent, v. Lucy B. Hayes, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7039
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES ANDERSON MILLER, a/k/a Sonny Miller, a/k/a Bubba, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-90-60, CA-96-434-5-BR) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller , Nos. CR-90-60; CA-96-434-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 134

 136

 136

 146

 146

 152

 151

 147

 148

 140

 127

 130

 128

 128

 138

 150

 143

 158

 147

 140

 121

 117

 118

 112

 117

 113

 114

 115

 115

 115

 117

 121

 121

 128

 130

 138

 141

 138

 138

 120

 115

 116

 116

 114

 109

 104

 114

 114

 109

 104

 101

 102

 106

 97

 101

 103

 102

 104

 102

 98

 125

 128

 130

 136

 139

 143

 145

 141

 144

 130

 121

 124

 121

 120

 126

 126

 124

 130

 126

 122

 113

 109

 111

 107

 109

 109

 108

 109

 109

 107

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,902

 1,863

 1,838

 1,836

 1,844

 1,841

 1,842

 1,842

 1,864

 1,871

 1,866

 1,861

 1,853

 1,847

 1,848

 1,846

 1,840

 1,834

 1,821

 1,800

 1,768

 1,736

 1,703

 1,680

 1,668

 1,653

 1,640

 1,629

 1,612

 1,593

 136

 133

 131

 131

 132

 132

 132

 132

 133

 134

 133

 133

 132

 132

 132

 132

 131

 131

 130

 129

 126

 124

 122

 120

 119

 118

 117

 116

 115

 114

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.246 Disposition of specially denatured spirits on discontinuance of use.

At the time of discontinuance of use of specially denatured spirits, a Government agency may dispose of any excess specially denatured spirits (a) to another Government agency holding a permit, (b) by returning the specially denatured spirits to a vendor, or (c) in any manner authorized by the appropriate TTB officer. Specially denatured spirits may not be disposed of to the general public.
#### §§ 105.4-105.9 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert deRose, Chief Executive Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Robert deRose
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                      | 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Robert deRose          
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 645.12 What services may regular Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science projects provide? Any project assisted under this part may provide such services as— ( a ) Exposure to cultural events, academic programs, and other activities not usually available to disadvantaged youth;
( b ) Information, activities, and instruction designed to acquaint youth participating in the project with the range of career options available to the youth;
( c ) On-campus residential programs;
( d ) Mentoring programs involving elementary school or secondary school teachers or counselors, faculty members at institutions of higher education, students, or any combination of these persons;
( e ) Work-study positions where youth participating in the project are exposed to careers requiring a postsecondary degree;
( f ) Programs and activities as described in § 645.11 that are specially designed for participants who are limited English proficient, participants from groups that are traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education, participants who are individuals with disabilities, participants who are homeless children and youths, participants in or who are aging out of foster care, or other disconnected participants; and
( g ) Other activities designed to meet the purposes of the Upward Bound program in § 645.1.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-13)
[75 FR 65785, Oct. 26, 2010]
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

May-06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4,401 1,710 6,111 8,730 3,392 12,122 0.0 2-May-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 4 4,536 1,707 6,243 8,997 3,386 12,383 0.0 3-May-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 4 637 1,099 1,736 1,264 2,180 3,444 0.0 4-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 633 851 1,483 1,255 1,687 2,942 0.0 5-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 628 849 1,477 1,246 1,683 2,929 0.0 6-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 633 846 1,479 1,255 1,679 2,934 0.0 7-May-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 633 845 1,478 1,255 1,676 2,931 0.0 8-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 635 845 1,481 1,260 1,677 2,937 0.0 9-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 649 849 1,498 1,288 1,683 2,971 0.0 

10-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 328 847 1,175 651 1,680 2,331 0.0 11-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 408 852 1,260 810 1,689 2,499 0.0 12-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 144 847 991 285 1,680 1,965 0.0 13-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 141 848 989 280 1,682 1,962 0.0 14-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 142 850 992 282 1,686 1,968 0.0 

15-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 190 850 1,040 376 1,686 2,062 0.0 16-May-06 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 3 662 852 1,513 1,313 1,689 3,002 0.0 17-May-06 0 0 0 0 9 24 33 5 249 849 1,098 493 1,684 2,177 0.0 18-May-06 0 0 0 0 27 708 735 57 3,738 2,273 6,011 7,415 4,508 11,923 0.0 19-May-06 0 0 0 0 168 1,158 1,326 152 4,083 2,849 6,932 8,099 5,650 13,749 0.0 20-May-06 0 0 0 0 384 360 744 205 3,079 2,852 5,931 6,108 5,657 11,765 0.0 21-May-06 0 0 0 0 603 564 1,167 288 2,868 2,842 5,710 5,688 5,638 11,326 0.0 22-May-06 0 0 0 0 312 1,932 2,244 448 2,308 2,844 5,151 4,577 5,641 10,218 0.0 23-May-06 0 0 0 0 131 2,136 2,267 610 3,414 2,854 6,267 6,771 5,660 12,431 0.0 24-May-06 0 0 0 0 222 2,244 2,466 786 3,107 2,854 5,960 6,162 5,660 11,822 0.0 25-May-06 0 0 0 0 450 8,184 8,634 1,403 3,134 2,854 5,988 6,217 5,660 11,877 0.0 26-May-06 0 0 0 0 348 3,168 3,516 1,654 3,520 2,873 6,393 6,982 5,698 12,680 0.0 27-May-06 0 0 0 0 243 16,764 17,007 2,869 3,450 2,865 6,315 6,843 5,682 12,525 0.0 28-May-06 0 0 0 0 1,875 36,720 38,595 5,626 3,721 2,853 6,574 7,380 5,659 13,039 0.0 29-May-06 0 0 0 0 4,326 66,072 70,398 10,654 3,557 2,853 6,410 7,056 5,659 12,715 0.0 30-May-06 0 0 0 0 2,262 34,920 37,182 13,308 1,412 2,867 4,279 2,800 5,687 8,487 0.0 31-May-06 0 0 0 0 1,656 56,880 58,536 17,487 1,997 2,860 4,858 3,962 5,673 9,635 0.0 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 13,034 231,858 244,892 XXXX 59,037 55,786 114,823 117,100 110,651 227,751 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for May = 30,500

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta 

Daily D

Tracy Combined SWP
****
****Thursday,  January 26,  2012****
**Your browser does not support script. Please use the navigation text menu at the bottom of the page.**

  

****
****
**Back to the Arboretum Home PageArboretum Information || Events & Education || Gardens & Horticulture || Research ActivitiesNew Plant Introductions || Support the Arboretum ||Comments**

*Last Updated   January 24, 2012 10:50 PM*URL = http://www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/index.html

**Please address any comments or questions regarding any portion of this web page by e-mail to the USNA site administrator**
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.179 Package identification number or serial number. ( a ) *Requirement.* A dealer who fills packages with specially denatured spirits shall mark each package with a package identification number, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, or a serial number, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Package identification number.* A package identification number shall apply to all of the packages filled at the same time on which all of the marks required by § 20.178 (a)(1) and (a)(3) through (a)(8) are identical. All of the packages in one lot shall be the same type, have the same rated capacity, and be uniformly filled with the same quantity. A package identification number shall be derived from the date on which the package is filled, and shall consist of the following elements, in the order shown— ( 1 ) The last two digits of the calendar year;
( 2 ) An alphabetical designation from “A” through “L,” representing January through December, in that order;
( 3 ) The digits corresponding to the day of the month; and
( 4 ) A letter suffix when more than one identical lot is filled into packages during the same day. For successive lots after the first lot, a letter suffix shall be added in alphabetical order, with “A” representing the second lot of the day, “B” representing the third lot of the day, etc. (e.g., the first three lots filled into packages on November 19, 1983, would be identified as “83K19,” “83K19A,” and “83K19B”).
( c ) *Serial number.* A consecutive serial number shall be marked on each package, beginning with the number “1” and continuing in regular sequence. The dealer shall use a separate but similar number series for packages containing specially denatured rum. When any numbering series reaches “1,000,000”, the dealer may recommence the series by providing an alphabetical prefix or suffix for each number in the new series.
( d ) *Continuation of numbering series.* If a change in proprietorship, name, or trade name occurs, the numbering system in use at the time of the change may be continued. If serial numbers are used at the time of a change, the numbering series in use at the time of the change may be continued.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1360, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5206))
#### § 19.520 Spirits for shipment to Puerto Rico.

Spirits removed for shipment to Puerto Rico with benefit of drawback or without payment of tax in accordance with part 28 of this chapter are subject to the provisions of part 5 of this chapter in regard to labeling and standards of fill for bottles.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Eugene E. Eichler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Save the World Air, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 20, 2005 /s/ EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene E. EichlerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.5
   
  
 Warrant Company [__________________] Warrantholder [________] Warrant Shares Exercise Price Section 10
 1. Warrant Term . Section 2.4




---



##### 



2. Exercise of Warrant; Payment of Taxes .
 2.1 Exercise of Warrant . Exhibit A
 2.2 Warrant Shares Certificate .
 2.3 Payment of Taxes .
 2.4 Exercise or Termination upon Corporate Event . Exercise Proceeds
 3. Restrictions on Transfer; Restrictive Legends .
 3.1 Restrictions on Transfer .
 - 2 -




---



##### 



3.2 Restrictive Legends . Section 2
 3.3 Lock-Up . Public Offering
 4. Reservation and Registration of Warrant Shares .
 5. Anti-Dilution Adjustments .
 5.1 Stock Dividends and Combinations .
  - 3 -




---



##### 



5.2 Recapitalization, Etc .
 5.3 Computations . Section 5 Section 5 vis à vis
 5.4 Par Value .
 6. Transfer and Exchange .
 7. Loss or Destruction of Warrant .
 8. Ownership of Warrant .
 9. Amendments .
 - 4 -




---



##### 



10. Definitions .
 Affiliate
 Business Day
 Charter
 Common Stock
  Corporate Event 
 Liquidation
 Person
 Securities Act
 Stockholders Agreement
 - 5 -




---



##### 



11. Miscellaneous Provisions .
 11.1 Entire Agreement .
 11.2 Binding Effect; Benefits .
 11.3 Section and Other Headings .
 11.4 Notices .
 If to the Company
 
   
 If to the Warrantholder
 
  - 6 -




---



##### 



11.5 Issuance Tax . provided that
 11.6 Severability .
 11.7 Governing Law .
 11.8 Rights as Shareholders .
 12. Disposition of Warrant or Shares of Common Stock . provided however
 - 7 -




---



##### 



provided however
 13. Warrantholders Representations .
 - 8 -




---



##### 



Issued By:
    
    
    


    Accepted By:ASPEN AEROGELS, INC.
    
    
    

    [_____________________ ]By:By:
    
    
    
    
    
    Its:John F. FairbanksChief Financial Officer
 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ASPEN AEROGELS, INC.
COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT




---



##### 



Exhibit A : Exercise Form
  To:
    
    Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (Company)30 Forbes Road, Northborough, MA 01532
    [name]  [address]
  [name]
 By:(Signature)Date:
    Its: