alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term "office" does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§234, 235 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§128, 129, 35 Stat. 1111, 1112).

Section consolidates sections 234 and 235 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

Reference in subsection (a) to intent to steal was omitted as covered by section 641 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" in subsecs. (a) and (b).

1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–510 inserted at end "As used in this subsection, the term 'office' does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, §552(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1567, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall be effective as of January 1, 1989."
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear by T.D. ATF-451, 66 FR 21668, 21669, May 1, 2001.

#### § 26.292 Consignee permit number.

If filing electronically, the importer must file with U.S. Customs and Border Protection the number associated with the consignee's permit issued under part 20 of this chapter (for shipments of specially denatured spirits) or part 22 of this chapter (for shipments of industrial spirits), along with the customs entry. If not filing electronically, the importer must make the permit available to the appropriate TTB officer or a customs officer upon request.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0064)

[T.D. TTB-145, 81 FR 94202, Dec. 22, 2016]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SCOTT HEDDINGS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-30002

D.C. No. 4:06-cr-00076-DWM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2015** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: FISHER, PAEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Scott Heddings appeals the district court’s sentence of 240 months in prison

following his guilty plea for receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.

FILED

MAR 17 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 2252A(a)(2) and destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2232(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The district court stated that Heddings’s Montana conviction for felony

incest was the basis for increasing his offense level for the federal offense under

§ 2G2.2(b)(5) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Because Heddings’s Missouri

convictions for sexual abuse and felony statutory sodomy were not the basis for an

increase in the offense level for the federal offense, the district court did not err in

declining to apply § 5G1.3(b) (2013) of the Guidelines to impose the sentence on

the federal offense to run concurrently with the Missouri sentences. Nor did the

district court abuse its discretion in ordering the sentence on the federal offense to

run consecutively to the Missouri sentences under § 5G1.3(c) of the Guidelines. 

See United States v. Shouse, 755 F.3d 1104, 1108–09 (9th Cir. 2014). 

As Heddings does not appeal his conviction or allege that his plea was

involuntary, United States v. Neely, 38 F.3d 458 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam), is not

applicable to a review of Heddings’s sentence on appeal. 

AFFIRMED.

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Cesarski, Appellant.

Mo opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 336

 316

 301

 303

 290

 284

 273

 272

 264

 252

 248

 243

 240

 247

 234

 232

 236

 228

 221

 211

 212

 206

 205

 201

 196

 198

 196

 198

 204

 200

 305

 289

 275

 275

 266

 257

 247

 244

 245

 238

 209

 224

 227

 226

 227

 219

 212

 183

 183

 183

 187

 197

 192

 192

 188

 190

 191

 193

 193

 189

 316

 299

 284

 283

 275

 266

 257

 252

 251

 244

 236

 232

 232

 232

 231

 226

 220

 210

 197

 198

 200

 202

 198

 196

 193

 193

 193

 195

 197

 194

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.75 Formula No. 40-A. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: One pound of sucrose octaacetate and
1 ⁄ 8 gallon of *tert*-butyl alcohol.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 111. Hair and scalp preparations. 112. Bay rum. 113. Lotions and creams (hand, face, and body). 114. Deodorants (body). 121. Perfumes and perfume tinctures. 122. Toilet waters and colognes. 141. Shampoos. 142. Soaps and bath preparations. 210. External pharmaceuticals, not U.S.P. or N.F. 410. Disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and other biocides. 450. Cleaning solutions (including household detergents). 470. Theater sprays, incense, and room deodorants.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses:
812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omphalos, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on August 13, 2008, as amended by this Form
10-Q/A of the Company filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the officer’s knowledge that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.




March
      9, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      Chu Pi YunChu
      Pi YunChief
      Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
                   § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gottschalks Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
February 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel T. Warzenski,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel T. Warzenski                   
|Daniel T. Warzenski                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 10, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gottschalks Inc. and will be
retained by Gottschalks Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the **

Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARCIAL GUARDADO-SIVIRIAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10661

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02074-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted December 19, 2012*** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Marcial Guardado-Sivirian appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after

FILED

JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10661

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Guardado-Sivirian’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Guardado-Sivirian with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Guardado-Sivirian has waived his right to appeal his conviction and

sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See

United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly

dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

DISMISSED.
-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT

96%

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

ID[

MHKDWWRUQH\#JPDLOFRP

81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

($67(51',675,&72)9,5*,1,$

5,&+021'',9,6,21

,QUH +DUULHW(6DOOH\&DVH.5+

'HEWRU&KDSWHU

25'(5$33529,1*/2$102',),&$7,21

 7KH'HEWRU+DUULHW(6DOOH\KDVILOHGZLWKWKH&RXUWD0RWLRQWR$SSURYHD0RUWJDJH

/RDQ0RGLILFDWLRQ7KHOHQGHULV&LWLJURXS0RUWJDJH/RDQ7UXVW53VHUYLFHGE\)D\

6HUYLFLQJ3/HQGHU ́7KH0RUWJDJHLVRQWKHSURSHUW\ORFDWHGDW:H[IRUG/DQH

5LFKPRQG9$DVGHVFULEHGLQWKHDWWDFKHG([KLELW3$ ́7KHSURSHUW\LVQRWWKH'HEWRU¶V

UHVLGHQFH

 7KHWHUPVRIWKH0RGLILFDWLRQDUHDVIROORZV

 D 7KH LQWHUHVW UDWH ZLOO EH  RQ D PRGLILHG SULQFLSDO EDODQFH RI  LQ

LQVWDOOPHQWVRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\SHUPRQWKDGMXVWHGIRUFKDQJHVLQWKHUHTXLUHGHVFURZ

DFFRXQWXQWLO0D\3ULQFLSDODQGLQWHUHVWSD\PHQWVZLOOUHPDLQWKHVDPHXQWLOPDWXULW\

 E7KHFXUUHQWPRUWJDJHSD\PHQWLVRQDSULQFLSDOEDODQFHRIWKDW

DFFUXHVLQWHUHVW DWWKH UDWH RI  ZLWK D PDWXULW\ GDWH RI -XQH    7KH RULJLQDOORDQ

DPRXQWZDVDWWKHORDQ¶VLQFHSWLRQ

 F7KHQHZPRUWJDJHSD\PHQWLVVOLJKWO\KLJKHUWKDQWKHSUHYLRXVRQH'HEWRUZLOOQRW

LQFUHDVHWKHPRQWKO\SD\PHQWVLQWRWKH&KDSWHUSODQ

 7KH &RXUW ILQGLQJ WKDW WKH SURSRVHG /RDQ 0RGLILFDWLRQ LV LQ WKH EHVW LQWHUHVWV RI WKH

'HEWRUVDQGILQGLQJWKDWQRSDUW\LQLQWHUHVWKDVRSSRVHGWKHPRGLILFDWLRQLWLVKHUHE\

 

25'(5('WKDWWKH/RDQ0RGLILFDWLRQLVKHUHE\DSSURYHGDQGLWLVIXUWKHU

 25'(5('WKDWWKH&KDSWHUWUXVWHHVKDOOVWRSSD\LQJWKHFODLPVXEPLWWHGE\/HQGHU

DVWKHPRUWJDJHDUUHDUVDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKHQHZSULQFLSDOEDODQFHLQWKHPRGLILHGORDQDQGLWLV

IXUWKHU

25'(5('WKDWWKLVPRGLILFDWLRQLVELQGLQJRQDQ\VXFFHVVRULQLQWHUHVWWRWKH/HQGHU

VKRXOGWKH/HQGHUVHOORUDVVLJQWKHORDQLQWKHIXWXUH
-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT

96%

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

ID[

MHKDWWRUQH\#JPDLOFRP

7KH &OHUN¶V 2IILFH ZLOO PDLO FRSLHV RI WKLV RUGHU WR WKH SDUWLHV RQ WKH VHUYLFH OLVW EHORZ QRW

UHFHLYLQJHOHFWURQLFVHUYLFHWKHUHRI

     BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

     8QLWHG6WDWH%DQNUXSWF\-XGJH

     (QWHUHGRQWKHGRFNHW

 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

,DVNIRUWKLV  



V-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ 

-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT

96%

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

ID[

6HHQ

BV6X]DQQH(:DGHBBBBBBBBBBBB

6X]DQQH(:DGH&KDSWHUWUXVWHH

*OHQ)RUHVW'ULYH

6XLWH

5LFKPRQG9$

&HUWLILFDWLRQ

7KHXQGHUVLJQHGKHUHE\FHUWLILHVWKDWDOOQHFHVVDU\SDUWLHVKDYHHQGRUVHGWKLVRUGHU

       V-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ 

     -HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VTXLUH   

-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT  (OHFWURQLFVHUYLFH

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

6X]DQQH(:DGH(VT  (OHFWURQLFVHUYLFH

&KDSWHUWUXVWHH

*OHQ)RUHVW'ULYH

6XLWH

5LFKPRQG9$

/s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Nov 9 2021

Nov 10 2021
-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT

96%

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

ID[

MHKDWWRUQH\#JPDLOFRP

+DUULHW(6DOOH\   E\PDLO

7RSSLQJ/DQH

*OHQ$OOHQ9$

)D\6HUYLFLQJ    (OHFWURQLFVHUYLFH

FR0F&DOOD5D\PHU/HLEHUW3LHUFH//&

%DQNUXSWF\'HSW

2OG$ODEDPD5RDG

5RVZHOO*$
-HDQQH(+RYHQGHQ(VT

96%

32%R[

&KHVWHUILHOG9$

ID[

MHKDWWRUQH\#JPDLOFRP

6FKHGXOH$

$OO WKDW FHUWDLQ WUDFW RU SDUFHO RI ODQG O\LQJ DQG EHLQJ LQ 3RWRPDF

0DJLVWHULDO 'LVWULFW.LQJ*HRUJH &RXQW\ 9LUJLQLDFRQWDLQLQJ DQ DUHD RI

$FUHVPRUHRUOHVVDQGNQRZDQGGHVLJQDWHGDV/RWRI6HFWLRQ

RIWKH6XEGLYLVLRQNQRZDV.LQJ*HRUJHRQWKH3RWRPDFDQGVKRZQRQ D

SODW RI VXUYH\E\ 0DWKHZV:KHDWOH\ DQG $OOLVRQ GDWHG)HEUXDU\ 

VDLGVXUYH\UHFRUGHG LQWKH&OHUN
V2IILFH RIWKH&LUFXLW&RXUWRI

.LQJ*HRUJH&RXQW\9LUJLQLDLQ3ODW%RRN3DJH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,160.89

 1,160.86

 1,160.83

 1,160.80

 1,160.77

 1,160.76

 1,160.75

 1,160.75

 1,160.75

 1,160.74

 1,160.74

 1,160.73

 1,160.73

 1,160.73

 1,160.72

 1,160.71

 1,160.71

 1,160.70

 1,160.71

 1,160.72

 1,160.71

 1,160.69

 1,160.67

 1,160.66

 1,160.66

 1,160.65

 1,160.65

 1,160.65

 1,160.65

 1,160.64

 7.34

 7.33

 7.31

 7.30

 7.28

 7.28

 7.27

 7.27

 7.27

 7.27

 7.27

 7.26

 7.26

 7.26

 7.26

 7.25

 7.25

 7.25

 7.25

 7.26

 7.25

 7.24

 7.23

 7.23

 7.23

 7.22

 7.22

 7.22

 7.22

 7.21

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.01

+0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

CHANGE

1

1

1

2

1

-1

-1

2

2

0

3

-1

3

3

0

0

2

-1

5

4

-1

-2

1

0

2

-1

2

2

2

-1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 3

 5

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .19

 .14

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .13

 .10

 .12

 .08

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .06

 .21

 .28

 .14

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .04

 .07

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .24

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/19/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.21 30 60 0 48 2.89 .37

ACRE-FEET -210 60 119 0 95

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 119

 119

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .37

JULY 1, 2013 .40

 7.36
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001103078
<NAME>                        WASATCH WEB ADVISORS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         20,721
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,721
<PP&E>                                         4,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,143
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,714
<SALES>                                        226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Moreal Chu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Visual Frontier, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Visual Frontier, Inc.

           I, Starcia Chang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Visual Frontier, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Visual Frontier, Inc.

                                        By:  /s/ Moreal Chu
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Moreal Chu
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             President

                                        By:  /s/ Starcia Chang
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Starcia Chang
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Secretary