alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3534. Annual report on WTO

Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 1996, the Trade Representative shall submit to the Congress a report describing, for the preceding fiscal year of the WTO—

(1) the major activities and work programs of the WTO, including the functions and activities of the committees established under article IV of the WTO Agreement, and the expenditures made by the WTO in connection with those activities and programs;

(2) the percentage of budgetary assessments by the WTO that were accounted for by each WTO member country, including the United States;

(3) the total number of personnel employed or retained by the Secretariat of the WTO, and the number of professional, administrative, and support staff of the WTO;

(4) for each personnel category described in paragraph (3), the number of citizens of each country, and the average salary of the personnel, in that category;

(5) each report issued by a panel or the Appellate Body in a dispute settlement proceeding regarding Federal or State law, and any efforts by the Trade Representative to provide for implementation of the recommendations contained in a report that is adverse to the United States;

(6) each proceeding before a panel or the Appellate Body that was initiated during that fiscal year regarding Federal or State law, the status of the proceeding, and the matter at issue;

(7) the status of consultations with any State whose law was the subject of a report adverse to the United States that was issued by a panel or the Appellate Body; and

(8) any progress achieved in increasing the transparency of proceedings of the Ministerial Conference and the General Council, and of dispute settlement proceedings conducted pursuant to the Dispute Settlement Understanding.

(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, §124, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4832.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), see section 130 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 3531 of this title.
#### Manhattan Commercial Company, Plaintiff, v. Frank Paul, Defendant.

— Exceptions overruled and judgment directed for plaintiff for $1,059.25, with interest from March 20,1913, and with costs of this action and of the appeal, on authority of *York*v. *Conde*(147 N. Y. 486). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.91 Premises.

All persons qualified to withdraw and use tax-free alcohol shall have premises suitable for the business being conducted and adequate for the protection of the revenue. Storage facilities shall be provided on the premises for tax-free alcohol received or recovered. The storage facilities may consist of a combination of storerooms, compartments, or stationary storage tanks.
### §1620. Acceptance of money by United States officers 1

Any officer of the United States who directly or indirectly receives, accepts, or contracts for any portion of the money which may accrue to any person making such 1 detection and seizure, or furnishing such 1 information, shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than two years, or both, and shall be thereafter ineligible to any office of honor, trust, or emolument. Any such person who pays to any such officer, or to any person for the use of such officer, any portion of such money, or anything of value for or because of such money, shall have a right of action against such officer, or his legal representatives, or against such person, or his legal representatives, and shall be entitled to recover the money so paid or the thing of value so given.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §620, 46 Stat. 758.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As enacted by act June 17, 1930, the catchline for this section was "Same—United States officers", as this section was intended to be read as a continuation of the provisions introduced in section 1619 of this title, and the use of "such" in the first sentence is similarly meant to refer back to section 1619. For text of section 1619 of this title prior to its general amendment by Pub. L. 99–570, see 1986 Amendment note under that section.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §620, 42 Stat. 988. That section was superseded by section 620 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Provisions somewhat similar to those in this section but excepting cases of smuggling were contained in act June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §7, 18 Stat. 187, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 989.

1 See Codification note below.
### §839h. Separability

If any provision of section 839b(a) through (c) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person, State, Indian tribe, entity, or circumstance is held invalid, neither the remainder of section 839b of this title or any other provisions of this chapter, nor the application of such provisions to other persons, States, Indian tribes, entities, or circumstances, shall be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 96–501, §12, Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2736.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 316

 308

 307

 314

 316

 323

 347

 358

 352

 353

 352

 359

 355

 356

 357

 357

 352

 352

 350

 349

 341

 334

 332

 332

 332

 331

 329

 330

 331

 329

 332

 271

 279

 282

 279

 290

 283

 308

 312

 319

 318

 313

 325

 304

 280

 316

 322

 313

 331

 317

 314

 330

 313

 326

 322

 316

 312

 308

 307

 313

 310

 315

 292

 291

 294

 298

 306

 307

 320

 329

 333

 336

 334

 340

 332

 330

 336

 338

 338

 341

 337

 335

 335

 327

 329

 327

 326

 324

 323

 320

 323

 323

 324

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §1931. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(e), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section, Pub. L. 87–794, title III, §321, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 892, authorized giving of adjustment assistance to workers. See section 2271 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on 90th day following Jan. 3, 1975, see note set out under section 1901 of this title.
Case 19-36077-KLP Doc 200 Filed 08/23/21 Entered 08/24/21 13:25:26 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 19-36077-KLP Doc 200 Filed 08/23/21 Entered 08/24/21 13:25:26 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JERRY LEE ZASTERA, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. FRANK THOMPSON, Superintendent, Santiam Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee. No. 09-36141 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00434-MA
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Malcolm F. Marsh, Senior District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 11, 2011 ** Portland, Oregon Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Jerry Lee Zastera petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to sever the two cases against him. Because the parties are familiar with the factual a nd procedural history of this case, we do 

# FILED
JUL 13 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 not recount additional facts except as nece ssary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm the judgment of the district court, and deny the petition. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, we may grant habeas relief only if the state court’s decision was (1) “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of , clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of th e United States,” or (2) “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) . The government contends that the state trial court could not have applied established federal law in an unreasonable manner, noting that no Supreme Court case has addressed the constitutional implications of joinder of indictments. Zastera argues, however, that the trial court’s denial of his motion to sever the two cases against him violated his rights to a fair trial, see Smith v. Phillips , 455 U.S. 209, 217 (1982), and to testify in his own defense, see Rock v. Arkansas , 483 U.S. 44, 51 (1987). Even applying the legal principles thatZastera advocates, however, the trial court did not apply clearly established fe deral law in an unreasonable manner. In the context of a trial court’s denial of a motion to sever counts in a single indictment, a trial is unfair “if the impermissible joinder had a substantial and3 injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict,” Davis v. Woodford , 384 F.3d 628, 638 (9th Cir. 2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), and here there is no evidence that the tria l court’s denial of the motion to sever influenced the jury’s verdict. Nor did Zastera make “a convincing showing that he [had] both important testimony to give concerning one [case] and a strong need to refrain from testifying on the other.” United States v. Armstrong , 621 F.2d 951, 954 (9th Cir. 1980) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GARY GREEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 588 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 409.42

 409.19

 408.90

 408.56

 408.24

 407.91

 407.74

 407.65

 407.39

 407.18

 406.99

 406.81

 406.58

 406.63

 407.86

 409.60

 410.57

 411.00

 411.28

 411.54

 411.77

 411.84

 412.00

 412.19

 412.48

 412.74

 412.93

 413.00

 413.18

 413.38

 413.50

 445.5

 443.8

 441.7

 439.2

 436.8

 434.4

 433.2

 432.6

 430.7

 429.2

 427.8

 426.5

 424.8

 425.2

 434.1

 446.9

 454.1

 457.3

 459.4

 461.4

 463.1

 463.6

 464.9

 466.3

 468.5

 470.5

 471.9

 472.5

 473.9

 475.4

 476.3

STORAGE

-1.8

-1.7

-2.1

-2.5

-2.3

-2.4

-1.2

-0.7

-1.9

-1.5

-1.4

-1.3

-1.6

+0.4

+8.9

+12.8

+7.2

+3.2

+2.1

+2.0

+1.7

+0.5

+1.2

+1.5

+2.2

+2.0

+1.5

+0.5

+1.4

+1.5

+0.9

CHANGE

1,226

1,257

1,151

963

904

1,212

1,420

1,441

1,395

1,364

1,086

1,142

1,303

1,714

6,420

7,892

5,120

3,117

2,684

2,513

2,206

2,241

2,242

2,530

2,712

2,561

2,422

2,054

2,298

2,397

2,165

INFLOW

 1,995

 1,949

 2,110

 2,084

 1,945

 2,308

 1,961

 1,699

 2,252

 2,010

 1,655

 1,664

 2,001

 1,442

 1,867

 1,386

 1,414

 1,432

 1,528

 1,435

 1,238

 1,869

 1,526

 1,737

 1,534

 1,471

 1,588

 1,711

 1,514

 1,527

 1,609

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 85

 85

 89

 102

 106

 92

 80

 71

 73

 86

 91

 84

 91

 92

 77

 64

 63

 63

 64

 60

 64

 72

 75

 62

 59

 64

 67

 69

 70

 70

 67

PUMPING

 42

 82

 30

 32

 34

 27

 0

 0

 19

 34

 34

 44

 41

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 25

 28

 28

 33

 31

 0

 3

 26

 36

 5

 15

 23

 23

C.F.S.

 .17

 .33

 .12

 .13

 .14

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .14

 .14

 .18

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .13

 .12

 .00

 .01

 .10

 .14

 .02

 .06

 .09

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 1.30

 .69

 .69

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 6, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +29.1 71,152 53,461 0 0 2,357 695 2.79 4.31

ACRE-FEET +29,100 141,130 106,040 0 0 4,675 1,379

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 447.3

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 106,040

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 4,675

TOTAL 110,715

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 11.92

OUTLET 0 4.31

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 11.47
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 20-12475-BFK Doc 129 Filed 12/28/21 Entered 12/28/21 12:34:47 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SERGIO VELASQUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00009

- CR

Appeal from

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20160D04688 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17 TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 2018

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Ro driguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 212 168 180

2 193 160 176

3 205 170 190

4 222 192 208

5 235 190 208

6 225 184 204

7 224 182 202

8 229 179 199

9 221 179 201

10 208 177 192

11 245 173 193

12 240 178 195

13 228 187 196

14 210 184 195

15 205 180 191

16 196 177 188

17 202 175 186

18 200 173 184

19 200 168 181

20 191 163 175

21 196 162 175

22 198 162 178

23 193 162 174

24 183 162 171

25 197 158 172

26 198 161 174

27 200 164 175

28 195 161 173

29 193 162 171

30 184 161 171

31 175 156 165

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Farrar Park At Dutch Slough 

Period: May 2023 Run Date: 6/12/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 512.90

 513.50

 514.22

 514.75

 515.16

 515.35

 515.69

 515.83

 515.97

 516.30

 516.60

 517.00

 517.70

 518.62

 519.40

 520.40

 521.45

 522.39

 523.21

 524.13

 525.03

 525.78

 526.62

 527.81

 528.90

 529.80

 530.80

 531.80

 532.70

 533.70

 534.60

 1,658,128

 1,665,244

 1,673,797

 1,680,103

 1,684,987

 1,687,251

 1,691,307

 1,692,978

 1,694,649

 1,698,591

 1,702,177

 1,706,963

 1,715,350

 1,726,393

 1,735,776

 1,747,830

 1,760,517

 1,771,903

 1,781,856

 1,793,045

 1,804,014

 1,813,173

 1,823,450

 1,838,044

 1,851,446

 1,862,538

 1,874,889

 1,887,268

 1,898,434

 1,910,867

 1,922,081

 6,016

 5,887

 6,196

 6,876

 6,787

 3,088

 4,667

 2,265

 2,261

 1,679

 0

 2,013

 3,349

 5,346

 2,492

 2,990

 5,876

 2,456

 3,168

 1,362

 2,086

 2,731

 2,685

 5,437

 4,932

 1,999

 4,745

 4,725

 7,674

 7,649

 7,402

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 9, 2007

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2006 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 271,059 0 7,962 115,799

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 7,106

 7,116

 8,553

 6,306

 4,884

 2,264

 4,056

 1,671

 1,671

 3,942

 3,586

 4,786

 8,387

 11,043

 9,383

 12,054

 12,687

 11,386

 9,953

 11,189

 10,969

 9,159

 10,277

 14,594

 13,402

 11,092

 12,351

 12,379

 11,166

 12,433

 11,214

 316

 341

 332

 349

 358

 376

 371

 359

 347

 332

 309

 288

 307

 323

 283

 210

 205

 199

 203

 197

 179

 175

 155

 161

 138

 130

 161

 161

 191

 245

 261

5,426

5,062

5,380

6,383

6,206

2,563

4,113

4,301

4,306

3,776

1,975

1,450

2,987

4,422

1,764

2,551

5,623

1,918

2,558

981

1,730

2,125

1,928

4,760

4,620

1,209

3,366

3,495

6,063

6,647

6,111

ELEV STORAGE

 126,839

 569,378

 574,440

 579,820

 586,203

 592,409

 594,972

 599,085

 603,386

 607,692

 611,468

 613,443

 614,893

 617,880

 622,302

 624,066

 626,617

 632,240

 634,158

 636,716

 637,697

 639,427

 641,552

 643,480

 648,240

 652,860

 654,069

 657,435

 660,930

 666,993

 673,640

 679,751

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 563,952

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10,000
EXHIBIT 4.3



AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE



THIS AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (the Amendment) relates to a certain Convertible Promissory Note (Note) dated February 21, 2003, in the original principal amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00) (U.S.) given by TEDA TRAVEL INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, payable to the order of MAGNOLIA GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, a corporation registered in the British Virgin Islands.



The Note is hereby amended as follows:



1.

The principal amount of the Note is hereby amended by striking the principal amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00) (U.S.) as set forth throughout the Note and substituting therefor the principal amount of THREE MILLION THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,350,000.00) (U.S.).



2.

The Conversion Price is hereby amended by striking the amount of Fifty Cents ($0.50) (U.S.) per share as set forth in the first sentence of Section 2.8 of the Note and substituting therefore the amount of Point Four Seven Eight Five Seven Cents ($0.47857) (U.S.) per share.



Except as modified hereby, the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same and in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Note.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of this 3rd day of July, 2003.



TEDA TRAVEL INCORPORATED,

a Florida corporation



By:

/s/ Godfrey Hui Chin Tong

Godfrey Hui Chin Tong, Chief Executive Officer





Payee hereby consents to the foregoing Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note.



July 24, 2003

MAGNOLIA GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED,

a corporation registered in the British Virgin Islands



By:

/s/ Wang Zuo Fei

Wang Zuo Fei, Chairman
### §1589. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7367(c)(5), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4480

Section, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §589, as added Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §320, 98 Stat. 2056, set forth arrest authority of customs officers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 589 of act June 17, 1930, was added by Pub. L. 98–573, title II, §213(a)(17), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2988, and is classified to section 1589a of this title.

A prior section 589 of act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, 46 Stat. 750, related to unlawful relanding and was classified to this section, prior to repeal by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948. See section 544 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
#### Cecile De Wentworth, Appellant, v. Edward J. McGuire, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. (Scott, J., dissented.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Allan L. Schwartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                              /s/ Allan L. Schwartz
                              ---------------------
                              Allan L. Schwartz
                              Executive Vice President and
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              September 13, 2005
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004373 23-MAR-2015 09:00 AM
#### § 303.122 Reimbursement procedures.

Each system must include procedures for securing the timely reimbursement of funds used under part C of the Act, in accordance with subpart F of this part.

(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(12), 1440(a))
§ 19.348 Formula requirements. A proprietor must obtain approval of a formula on form TTB F 5100.51 as provided in §§ 5.26 and 5.27 of this chapter before a proprietor may: ( a ) Blend, mix, purify, refine, compound, or treat spirits in any manner which results in a change of character, composition, class, or type of the spirits, including redistillation as provided in § 19.314; or
( b ) Produce gin or vodka by other than original and continuous distillation.
(26 U.S.C. 5201, 5555)