Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Proposed Rules 79359 

(9) Alcoa must keep fuel purchase 

records showing the types(s) of fuel 

combusted in the ingot furnaces. 

(10) Records must be retained at the 

facility for at least five years and be 

made available to EPA Region 10 upon 

request. 

(i) Reporting. (1) Alcoa must report 

SO2 emissions by calendar month to 

EPA Region 10 on an annual basis at the 

same time as the annual compliance 

certification required by the Part 70 

operating permit for the Alcoa plant is 

submitted to the Title V permitting 

authority. 

(2) Alcoa must report NOX emissions 

by calendar month to EPA Region 10 on 

an annual basis at the same time as the 

annual compliance certification 

required by the Part 70 operating permit 

for the Alcoa plant is submitted to the 

Title V permitting authority. 

(3) Alcoa must report the sulfur 

content of each shipment of coke 

received at the facility during the 

compliance period to EPA Region 10 at 

the same time as the annual compliance 

certification required by the Part 70 

operating permit for the Alcoa plant is 

submitted to the Title V permitting 

authority. 

(4) Alcoa must report the fuel 

purchase records for the anode bake 

furnaces and the ingot furnaces during 

the compliance period to EPA Region 10 

at the same time as the annual 

compliance certification required by the 

Part 70 operating permit for the Alcoa 

plant is submitted to the Title V 

permitting authority. 

(5) All documents and reports must be 

sent to EPA Region 10 electronically, in 

a format approved by EPA Region 10, to 

the following email address: R10- 

AirPermitReports@epa.gov. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30894 Filed 12–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0023; FRL–9903–69] 

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions 

Filed for Residues of Pesticide 

Chemicals in or on Various 

Commodities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: This document announces the 

Agency’s receipt of several initial filings 

of pesticide petitions requesting the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various commodities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 29, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number and the pesticide petition 

number (PP) of interest as shown in the 

body of this document, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert McNally, Biopesticides and 

Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) 

(7511P), telephone number: (703) 305– 

7090, email address: 

BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov; or Lois Rossi, 

Registration Division (RD) (7505P), 

telephone number: (703) 305–7090, 

email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov; 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. As part of the mailing 

address, include the contact person’s 

name, division, and mail code. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

If you have any questions regarding 

the applicability of this action to a 

particular entity, consult the division 

listed at the end of the pesticide petition 

summary of interest. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low-income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79360 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. What action is the agency taking? 

EPA is announcing its receipt of 

several pesticide petitions filed under 

section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), (21 U.S.C. 

346a), requesting the establishment or 

modification of regulations in 40 CFR 

part 180 for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various food 

commodities. The Agency is taking 

public comment on the requests before 

responding to the petitioners. EPA is not 

proposing any particular action at this 

time. EPA has determined that the 

pesticide petitions described in this 

document contain the data or 

information prescribed in FFDCA 

section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not 

fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 

submitted data at this time or whether 

the data support granting of the 

pesticide petitions. After considering 

the public comments, EPA intends to 

evaluate whether and what action may 

be warranted. Additional data may be 

needed before EPA can make a final 

determination on these pesticide 

petitions. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a 

summary of each of the petitions that 

are the subject of this document, 

prepared by the petitioner, is included 

in a docket EPA has created for each 

rulemaking. The docket for each of the 

petitions is available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

As specified in FFDCA section 

408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)), EPA is 

publishing notice of the petition so that 

the public has an opportunity to 

comment on this request for the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticides in 

or on various food commodities. Further 

information on the petition may be 

obtained through the petition summary 

referenced in this unit. 

New Tolerance 

1. PP 3E8201. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0729). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

requests to establish a tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

desiccant, defoliant, and herbicide 

paraquat dichloride, (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′- 

bipyridinium-ion) derived from 

application of the dichloride salt 

(calculated as the cation) in or on 

tuberous and corm vegetables subgroup 

(Crop subgroup 1C) at 0.5 parts per 

million (ppm). An analytical method 

(spectrometric method) has been 

accepted and published in the Pesticide 

Analytical Manual (PAM Vol. II) for the 

enforcement of tolerances in plant 

commodities. (RD) 

2. PP 3E8202. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0712). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

requests to establish a tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for the residues of the 

herbicide sulfentrazone, (N-[2,4- 

dichloro-5-[4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5- 

dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4- 

triazol-1- 

yl]phenyl]methanesulfonamide) and its 

metabolite HMS (N-(2,4-dichloro-5-(4- 

(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3- 

hydroxymethyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1- 

yl)phenyl)methanesulfonamide, 

calculated as the stoichiometric 

equivalent of sulfentrazone, in or on 

apple at 0.15 ppm. There is a practical 

analytical method for detecting and 

measuring levels of sulfentrazone and 

its metabolites in or on food with a limit 

of quantitation that allows monitoring of 

food with residues at or above the levels 

set or proposed in the tolerances. The 

analytical enforcement method for 

sulfentrazone was used with minor 

modification that eliminated several 

clean-up and derivatization steps that 

was required for gas chromatography/ 

mass spectrometry detection (GC/MSD), 

but not for liquid chromatograph/ 

tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). 

The analytical method for sulfentrazone 

involves separate analyses for parent 

and its metabolites. The parent is 

analyzed by evaporation and 

reconstitution of the sample prior to 

analysis by LC/MS/MS GC/ECD. The 

metabolites samples were refluxed in 

the presence of acid and cleaned up 

with solid phase extraction prior to 

analysis by LC/MS/MS. (RD) 

3. PP 3E8203. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0730). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

requests to establish tolerances in 40 

CFR part 180 for the combined residues 

of the insecticide spinetoram, expressed 

as a combination of XDE-175-J: 1-H-asindaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-7,15- 

dione, 2-[(6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-di-Omethyl-a-L-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-13- 

[[(2R,5S,6R)-5-(dimethylamino)tetra

hydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-yl] oxy]-9-

ethyl-2,3,3a,4,5,5a,5b,6,9,10,

11,12,13,14,16a,16b-hexadecahydro 14- 

methyl- (2R,3aR,5aR,5bS,9S,13S, 

14R,16aS,16bR); XDE-175-L: 1H-asindaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-7,15- 

dione, 2-[(6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-di-Omethyl-a-L-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-13-

[[(2R,5S,6R)-5-(dimethylamino)tetra

hydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]-9-

ethyl-2,3,3a,5a,5b,6,9,10,11, 

12,13,14,16a,16b-tetradecahydro-4,14-

dimethyl- (2S,3aR,5aS,5bS,9S,13S,14R,

16aS, 16bS); ND-J: (2R,3aR,5aR,

5bS,9S,13S,14R,16aS,16bR)-9-ethyl-14-

methyl-13-[[(2S,5S,6R)-6-methyl-5-

(methylamino)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]

oxy]-7,15-dioxo-2,3,3a,4,

5,5a,5b,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16a,16boctadecahydro-1H-as-indaceno[3,2- 

d]oxacyclododecin-2-yl 6-deoxy-3-Oethyl-2,4-di-O-methyl-alpha-L-manno

pyranoside; and NF-J: (2R,3S,6S)-6- 

([(2R,3aR,5aR,5bS,9S,13S,14R,

16aS,16bR)-2-[(6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4- 

di-O-methyl-alpha-L-mannopyranosyl) 

oxy]-9-ethyl-14-methyl-7,15-dioxo2,3,3a,4,5,5a,5b,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,

16a,16b-octadecahydro-1H-asindaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-13- 

yl]oxy)-2-methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-

yl(methyl)formamide in or on the 

following raw agricultural commodities: 

Coffee, green bean at 0.2 ppm; coffee, 

instant at 0.4 ppm; coffee, roasted bean 

at 0.4 ppm; cottonseed subgroup 20C at 

0.04 ppm; caneberry subgroup 13–07A 

at 0.7 ppm; bushberry subgroup 13–07B, 

except lingonberry at 0.25 ppm; fruit, 

small, vine climbing, except fuzzy 

kiwifruit, subgroup 13–07F at 0.5 ppm; 

berry, low growing, subgroup 13–07G, 

except blueberry, lowbush, and 

cranberry at 1.0 ppm; fruit, pome group 

11–10 at 0.2 ppm; vegetable, fruiting, 

group 8–10 at 0.4 ppm; fruit, citrus, 

group 10–10 at 0.3 ppm; fruit, stone, 

group 12–12 at 0.2 ppm; onion, bulb, 

subgroup 3–07A at 0.1 ppm; onion, 

green, subgroup 3–07B at 2.0 ppm; and 

nuts, tree, group 14–12 at 0.1 ppm. Per 

the Federal Register of October 10, 2007 

(72 FR 57492) (FRL–8149–9) supported 

by Data Package (DP) # 325387, August 

9, 2008, EPA has determined adequate 

analytical methods are available for 

enforcement purposes for spinetoram in 

plant and animal matrices. For more 

details on the analytical methods and 

for specific GRMs, see EPA 

Memorandum—‘‘Subject: Spinosad and 

Spinetoram; Human-Health Assessment 

Scoping Document in Support of 

Registration Review’’ dated August 9, 

2011 (Decision # 446932). EPA 

conservatively concluded that for water, 

residues should be estimated using the 

total spinetoram residue method (EPA, 

DP # 331741, September 20, 2007). (RD) 

4. PP 3E8204. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0727). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Proposed Rules 79361 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

requests to establish tolerances in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

insecticide spinosad, a fermentation 

product of Saccharopolyspora spinosa, 

consisting of two related active 

ingredients: Spinosyn A (Factor A: CAS 

Registry No. 131929–60–7) or 2-[(6- 

deoxy-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-a-L-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-13-[[5-(dimethylamino)-

tetrahydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]- 

9-ethyl-2,3,3a,5a,5b,6,9,10,11,12,

13,14,16a,16b-tetradecahydro-14- 

methyl-1H-as-Indaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclo

dodecin-7,15-dione; and Spinosyn D 

(Factor D; CAS Registry No. 131929-63- 

0) or 2-[(6-deoxy-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-a-Lmanno-pyranosyl)oxy]-13-[[5-(dimethylamino)-tetrahydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2- 

yl]oxy]-9-ethyl-2,3,3a,5a,

5b,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16a,16btetradecahydro-4,14-methyl-1H-asIndaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-7,15- 

dione, in or on the raw agricultural 

commodities: Coffee, green bean at 0.2 

ppm; coffee, instant at 0.4 ppm; coffee, 

roasted bean at 0.4 ppm; cottonseed 

subgroup 20C at 0.02 ppm; caneberry 

subgroup 13–07A at 0.7 ppm; bushberry 

subgroup 13–07B, except lingonberry at 

0.25 ppm; fruit, small, vine climbing, 

except fuzzy kiwifruit subgroup 13–07F 

at 0.5 ppm; berry, low growing, 

subgroup 13–07G, except blueberry, 

lowbush, and cranberry at 1.0 ppm; 

fruit, pome group 11–10 at 0.2 ppm; 

vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10 at 0.4 

ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10–10 at 0.3 

ppm; fruit, stone, group 12–12 at 0.2 

ppm; onion, bulb, subgroup 3–07A at 

0.1 ppm; onion, green, subgroup 3–07B 

at 2.0 ppm; and nuts, tree, group 14–12 

at 0.1 ppm. EPA has determined 

adequate analytical methods are 

available for enforcement purposes for 

spinosad in plant and animal matrices. 

For more details on the analytical 

methods and for specific GRMs, see EPA 

Memorandum—‘‘Subject: Spinosad and 

Spinetoram; Human-Health Assessment 

Scoping Document in Support of 

Registration Review,’’ dated August 9, 

2011 (Decision # 446932). EPA 

conservatively concluded that for water, 

residues should be estimated using the 

total spinosad residue method (EPA, 

Decision # 316077, August 2, 2006). 

(RD) 

5. PP 2F8053 (Revised) (EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2013–0008). BASF Corporation, 26 

Davis Drive, P.O. Box 13528, Research 

Triangle Park, NC 27709–3528 

submitted revisions to their initial 

pesticide petition 2F8139 to establish 

tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for 

residues of the herbicide saflufenacil, its 

metabolites, and degradates, in or on 

various commodities. Based on EPA’s 

evaluation of the data supporting the 

original petition, BASF Corporation 

revised the petition by proposing 

tolerances for fish-freshwater finfish and 

fish-shellfish, crustacean; at 0.01 parts 

per million (ppm). Compliance with the 

tolerance levels is to be determined by 

measuring only saflufenacil, 2-chloro-5- 

[3,6-dihydro-3-methyl-2,6-dioxo-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)-1(2H)-pyrimidinyl]-4- 

fluoro-N-[[methyl(1-methylethyl)amino]

sulfonyl]benzamide, in or on the 

commodities. Adequate enforcement 

methodology (LC–MS/MS) methods 

D0603/02 (plants) and L0073/01 

(livestock)) is available to enforce the 

tolerance expression. (RD) 

6. PP 3F8173. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–

0445). ISK Biosciences Corporation, 

7470 Auburn Road, Suite A, Concord, 

OH 44077, requests to establish a 

tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for 

residues of the herbicide flazasulfuron, 

1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-3-(3- 

trifluoromethyl-2-pyridylsulfonyl) urea, 

in or on tree nuts (Crop group 14–12) at 

0.01 ppm. A practical analytical method 

for flazasulfuron using LC–MS/MS is 

available for enforcement purposes. 

(RD) 

Amended Tolerance 

1. PP 3E8201. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–

0729). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

requests to remove the existing 

tolerance in 40 CFR 180.205(a) for 

residues of the desiccant, defoliant, and 

herbicide paraquat dichloride, (1,1′-di

methyl-4,4′-bipyridinium-ion) derived 

from application of the dichloride salt 

(calculated as the cation), in or on 

potato at 0.5 ppm, upon establishment 

of the proposed tolerance for the 

tuberous and corm vegetables subgroup 

(Crop subgroup 1C) at 0.5 ppm in 

paragraph 1. under ‘‘New Tolerance.’’ 

(RD) 

2. PP 3E8203. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0730). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

proposes based upon the establishment 

of tolerances in paragraph 3. under 

‘‘New Tolerance’’ to remove established 

tolerances at 40 CFR 180.635 for the 

combined residues of the insecticide 

spinetoram, expressed as a combination 

of XDE-175-J: 1-H-as-indaceno[3,2-d] 

oxacyclododecin-7,15-dione, 2-[(6-

deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-di-O-methyl-a-Lmannop pyranosyl)oxy]-13-[[(2R,5S,6R)- 

5-(dimethylamino)tetrahydro-6-methyl2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]-9-ethyl-2,3,3a,4,5,

5a,5b,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16a,16bhexadecahydro1 14-methyl-,(2R,3aR,5aR,

5bS,9S,13S,14R,16aS,16bR); XDE-175-L: 

1H-as-indaceno[3,2-d] oxacyclododecin7,15-dione, 2-[(6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-diO-methyl-a-L-manno pyranosyl)oxy]-13- 

[[(2R,5S,6R)-5- 

(dimethylamino)tetrahydro-6-methyl2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]-9-ethyl2,3,3a,5a,5b,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16a,16btetradecahydro-4,14-dimethyl-, 

(2S,3aR,5aS,5bS,9S,13S,14R,16aS,16bS); 

ND-J:(2R,3aR,5aR,5bS,9S,13S,14R,16aS, 

16bR)-9-ethyl-14-methyl-13- 

[[(2S,5S,6R)-6-methyl-5-(methylamino)

tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]-7,15- 

dioxo-2,3,3a,4,5,5a,5b,6,7,9,10,11,

12,13,14,15,16a,16b-octadecahydro-1Has-indaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-2-yl 

6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl-2,4-di-O-methylalpha-L-mannopyranoside; and NF-J: 

(2R,3S,6S)-6-([(2R,3aR,5aR,5bS,9S,13S, 

4R,16aS,16bR)-2-[(6-deoxy-3-O-ethyl2,4-di-O-methyl-alpha-Lmannopyranosyl) oxy]-9-ethyl-14- 

methyl-7,15-dioxo-2,3,3a,4,5,5a,

5b,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16a,16boctadecahydro-1H-as-indaceno[3,2- 

d]oxacyclododecin-13-yl]oxy)-2-methyl

tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl(methyl)

formamide, in or on the following raw 

agricultural commodities: Bushberry 

subgroup 13B at 0.25 ppm; caneberry 

subgroup 13A at 0.70 ppm; fruit, citrus, 

group 10 at 0.30 ppm; fruit, pome, group 

11 at 0.20 ppm; fruit, stone, group 12 at 

0.20 ppm; grape at 0.50 ppm; juneberry 

at 0.25 ppm; lingonberry at 0.25 ppm; 

nut tree, group 14 at 0.10 ppm; okra at 

0.40 ppm; onion, green at 2.0 ppm; 

pistachio at 0.10 ppm; salal at 0.25 ppm; 

strawberry at 1.0 ppm; vegetable, bulb, 

group 3, except green onion at 0.10 

ppm; vegetable, fruiting group 8 at 0.4 

ppm; and cotton, undelinted seed at 

0.04 ppm. (RD) 

3. PP 3E8204. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0727). Interregional Research Project 

Number 4 (IR–4), 500 College Road East, 

Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ 08540, 

proposes based upon the establishment 

of tolerances in paragraph 4. under 

‘‘New Tolerance’’ to remove established 

tolerances at 40 CFR 180.495 for 

residues of the insecticide spinosad, a 

fermentation product of 

Saccharopolyspora spinosa, consisting 

of two related active ingredients: 

Spinosyn A (Factor A: CAS Registry No. 

131929-60-7) or 2-[(6-deoxy-2,3,4-tri-Omethyl-a-L-manno-pyranosyl)oxy]-13- 

[[5-(dimethylamino)-tetrahydro-6- 

methyl-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]-9-ethyl2,3,3a,5a,5b,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16a,16btetradecahydro-14-methyl-1H-asIndaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-7,15- 

dione; and Spinosyn D (Factor D; CAS 

Registry No. 131929-63-0) or 2-[(6- 

deoxy-2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-a- L-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-13-[[5-(dimethyl-amino)- 

tetrahydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-yl]oxy]- 

9-ethylVerDate Mar<15>2010 18:38 Dec 27, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM 30DEP1

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79362 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

2,3,3a,5a,5b,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16a,16btetradecahydro-4,14-methyl-1H-asIndaceno[3,2-d]oxacyclododecin-7,15- 

dione, in or on the raw agricultural 

commodities: Bushberry subgroup 13B 

at 0.25 ppm; caneberry subgroup 13A at 

0.70 ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10 at 0.30 

ppm; fruit, pome, group 11 at 0.20 ppm; 

fruit, stone, group 12 at 0.20 ppm; grape 

at 0.50 ppm; juneberry at 0.25 ppm; 

lingonberry at 0.25 ppm; nut tree, group 

14 at 0.10 ppm; okra at 0.40 ppm; onion, 

green at 2.0 ppm; pistachio at 0.10 ppm; 

salal at 0.25 ppm; strawberry at 1.0 

ppm; vegetable, bulb, group 3, except 

green onion at 0.10 ppm; vegetable, 

fruiting group 8 at 0.4 ppm; and cotton, 

undelinted seed at 0.02 ppm. (RD) 

New Tolerance Exemption 

1. PP 3F8176. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2013– 

0717). Anatis Bioprotection, Inc., 278, 

rang Saint-Andre ́, St-Jacques-le-Mineur, 

Quebec JOJ 1Z0, Canada (represented by 

Technology Sciences Group, Inc., 712 

Fifth St., Suite A, Davis CA 95616), 

requests to establish an exemption from 

the requirement of a tolerance for 

residues of the microbial insecticide, 

Beauveria bassiana strain ANT–03, in or 

on all food commodities. The petitioner 

believes no analytical method is needed 

because their expectation is that, when 

used as proposed, Beauveria bassiana 

strain ANT–03 would not result in 

residues that are of toxicological 

concern. (BPPD) 

2. PP IN–10604. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2013–0700). Gowan Company, LLC, 

P.O. Box 5569, Yuma, AZ 85366 

requests to establish an exemption from 

the requirement of a tolerance for 

residues of ammonium acetate (CAS 

Registry No. 631–61–8), under 40 CFR 

180.920, when used at not more than 

15% of a pesticide formulation, as a 

preharvest inert ingredient in or on raw 

agricultural commodities. The petitioner 

believes no analytical method is needed 

because it is not required for the 

establishment of a tolerance exemption 

for inert ingredients. Based on the 

physical chemical characteristics of 

ammonium acetate, there is little 

likelihood of foliar residues remaining 

on treated crops. Ammonium acetate is 

highly soluble in water and undergoes 

rapid environmental degradation in soil 

and water, breaking down into acetate 

and ammonium. Acetate/acetic acid as 

such would not be expected to remain 

on foliage and or bioaccumulate or 

persist in humans. Therefore, analytical 

methods to assess residues of 

ammonium acetate are not required. 

(RD) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Agricultural commodities, Feed 

additives, Food additives, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: December 20, 2013. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2013–31258 Filed 12–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 67 

[Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002]; [Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1222] 

Proposed Flood Elevation 

Determinations for Nicollet County, 

Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) is 

withdrawing its proposed rule 

concerning proposed flood elevation 

determinations for Nicollet County, 

Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas. 

DATES: The proposed rule published 

October 6, 2011, at 76 FR 62006, is 

withdrawn as of December 30, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. FEMA–B– 

1222, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, 

Engineering Management Branch, 

Federal Insurance and Mitigation 

Administration, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, 

or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@

fema.dhs.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 

Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 

Management Branch, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–4064, or (email) 

Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 6, 2011, FEMA published a 

proposed rulemaking at 76 FR 62006, 

proposing flood elevation 

determinations along one or more 

flooding sources in Nicollet County, 

Minnesota. Because FEMA has or will 

be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood 

Insurance Rate Map, and if necessary a 

Flood Insurance Study report, featuring 

updated flood hazard information, the 

proposed rulemaking is being 

withdrawn. A Notice of Proposed Flood 

Hazard Determinations will be 

published in the Federal Register and in 

the affected community’s local 

newspaper. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4. 

Dated: November 22, 2013. 

Roy E. Wright, 

Deputy Associate Administrator for 

Mitigation, Department of Homeland 

Security, Federal Emergency Management 

Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2013–31022 Filed 12–27–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–12–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 64 

[CG Docket Nos. 08–15 and 03–123; DA 13– 

2191] 

Request for Comment on Petition Filed 

by AT&T Services, Inc., Regarding the 

Provision of Muting for Speech-toSpeech Telephone Services; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for clarification; request 

for comments; correction. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) corrects a document 

published at 78 FR 76096, December 16, 

2013. This document seeks comment on 

an AT&T Services, Inc., petition 

requesting clarification. The ACTION line 

incorrectly reflected the caption of the 

document; therefore, this document 

corrects the ACTION line to read ‘‘Petition 

for clarification; request for comments’’. 

DATES: December 30, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Caitlin Vogus, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability 

Rights Office, (202) 418–1264, email: 

Caitlin.vogus@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In FR Doc. 2013–28829 published on 

December 16, 2013, on page 76096, in 

the second column, correct the ACTION

caption to read: ‘‘ACTION: Petition for 

clarification; request for comments.’’ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS