alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000417 26-APR-2012 09:21 AM

NO. SCPW-12-0000417 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
MYLES D. SAPUTO, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE BLAINE J. KOBAYASHI, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
By letters dated April 11, 2012, Myles D. Saputo seeks review of the actions of Second Circuit District Judge Blaine Kobayashi in Case No. 2RC10-1-004119, City Bank v. Myles D. Saputo . We view the letters as a petition for writ of mandamus. A writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to the relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or to obtain the requested action. Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi , 81 Hawai' i 410, 414, 917P.2d 1284, 1288 (1996). Such writs are not meant to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower court, nor are they meant to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures. Id . Where a trial court has discretion to act, mandamus will not lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion, even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which it has a legal duty to act. Kema v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai' i 200, 204-205, 982 P.2d 334, 338-339 (1999). Petitioner Saputo’s letters make a number of allegations, but provide nothing from the court record to support the allegations, and review of the public docket for case number 2RC10-1-004119 reveals the case is pending in the district court. Petitioner will have the opportunity to seek review by way of appeal after judgment is entered in case number 2RC10-1-004119. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall file Petitioner Saputo’s letters as a petition for writ of mandamus, without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is denied. This denial is without prejudice to any timely appeal, complaint

-2­to the Commission on Judicial Conduct, or other lawful means of seeking redress. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, April 26, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

-3­
#### Maxwell M. Wallach, Appellant, v. Theresa R. Wallach, Respondent.

Motion for correction of order of this court dated January 12, 1948, and for reargument of appeal, denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See ante,’p. 813.]
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 29, 2011
 
 McMoRan Exploration Co.
  Delaware
    
    001-07791
    
    72-1424200(State or other 
jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification
Number)
 1615 Poydras Street 
New Orleans, Louisiana
    
    70112(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 7.01. Regulation FD DisclosureItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREExhibit IndexEX-99.1EX-99.2    Table of Contents  
 Regulation FD Disclosure.
  
 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



McMoRan Exploration Co.By:
    /s/ Nancy D. ParmeleeNancy D. ParmeleeSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
     and Secretary
(authorized signatory and Principal
     Financial Officer)




---



##### Table of Contents



ExhibitNumber99.1
    
    Press release dated June 29, 2011, titled McMoRan Exploration Co.
Updates Gulf of Mexico Exploration & Development Activities.99.2
    
    Slides presented in conjunction with McMoRans Gulf of Mexico
exploration and development update conference call conducted via the
internet on June 29, 2011.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Teda Travel Incorporated (the "Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hon Ming Wong,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Teda Travel Incorporated and will
be retained by Teda Travel Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Hon Ming Wong
---------------------
Hon Ming Wong
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 216

 221

 229

 239

 249

 263

 267

 271

 275

 269

 269

 265

 257

 260

 264

 259

 254

 233

 216

 208

 212

 215

 219

 208

 210

 210

 209

 206

 196

 194

 194

 176

 186

 190

 196

 205

 215

 221

 223

 222

 222

 221

 221

 219

 216

 212

 204

 208

 200

 199

 194

 190

 186

 184

 177

 166

 172

 172

 176

 176

 175

 175

 194

 199

 206

 215

 223

 232

 237

 238

 237

 235

 235

 233

 230

 229

 225

 222

 223

 216

 208

 200

 195

 195

 193

 187

 186

 185

 185

 185

 182

 181

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 3,456.65

 3,456.65

 3,456.59

 3,456.58

 3,456.54

 3,456.48

 3,456.47

 3,456.47

 3,456.41

 3,456.41

 3,456.41

 3,456.48

 3,456.48

 3,456.48

 3,456.53

 3,456.73

 3,456.84

 3,457.08

 3,457.46

 3,457.88

 3,458.20

 3,458.44

 3,458.63

 3,459.42

 3,461.40

 3,462.69

 3,463.32

 3,463.74

 3,464.11

 3,464.47

 3,464.79

 32,314

 32,314

 32,280

 32,274

 32,251

 32,217

 32,211

 32,211

 32,177

 32,177

 32,177

 32,217

 32,217

 32,217

 32,246

 32,359

 32,421

 32,558

 32,776

 33,016

 33,201

 33,340

 33,450

 33,910

 35,077

 35,850

 36,230

 36,484

 36,709

 36,929

 37,125

STORAGE

-11

+0

-34

-6

-23

-34

-6

+0

-34

+0

+0

+40

+0

+0

+29

+113

+62

+137

+218

+240

+185

+139

+110

+460

+1,167

+773

+380

+254

+225

+220

+196

CHANGE

9.7

16.0

-3.1

12.0

8.4

-2.1

12.6

14.2

-1.9

15.1

16.0

30.2

8.0

12.3

29.7

71.8

44.8

84.5

124.4

134.4

105.3

81.4

67.5

244.9

599.4

397.7

200.6

142.1

126.3

123.0

112.8

INFLOW

 14

 15

 13

 14

 19

 14

 14

 13

 14

 14

 15

 9

 7

 11

 14

 13

 12

 13

 13

 11

 11

 10

 11

 12

 10

 7

 8

 13

 11

 11

 13

CONDUIT

SPILL

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

 1.0

PK CR

 0.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.6

 0.2

 0.2

 0.1

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.3

 0.1

 0.8

 0.5

 1.4

 0.5

 1.4

 0.0

 0.3

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.9

 0.1

 0.0

C.F.S.

 .012

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .032

 .011

 .012

 .008

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .015

 .007

 .042

 .025

 .077

 .026

 .077

 .000

 .015

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .000

 .048

 .006

 .000

INCHES

 .02

 1.15

 .52

 1.78

 .53

 1.32

 .79

 1.62

 .36

 .65

 .30

 3.52

 2.82

 .77

 .73

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 JENKINSON LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 22, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,800 2,838.0 379 31.0 0.0 7.6 .413 16.88

ACRE-FEET +4,800 5,629.2 752 61.5 0.0 15.1

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

CAMINO-CONDUIT 751.7

SLY PARK CREEK

SPILL

 61.5

 0.0

 529.6

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 1999 TO DATE = 26.23

 32,325

 222.2 16.88

CAMINO SLY

CAMP

CREEK

C.F.S.

 3

 4

 3

 4

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 9

 6

 5

 9

 31

 18

 56

 56

 98

 57

 45

 38

 353

 327

 237

 150

 118

 97

 80

 82

 1,905

 3,779

E.I.D. PROJECT

E.I.D. WATER RIGHTS
### §835i. Contracts with State of Washington for maintenance and operation of fish hatcheries

In connection with fish hatcheries built or to be built as a part of the fish-protection program required on the Columbia Basin Dam project, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to contract with the State of Washington for the maintenance and operation of any of them at the expense of said State.

(Oct. 9, 1940, ch. 794, 54 Stat. 1085; May 27, 1937, ch. 269, §1, 50 Stat. 208; Mar. 10, 1943, ch. 14, 57 Stat. 14.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act May 27, 1937, as amended by act Mar. 10, 1943, changed name of project from "Grand Coulee Dam" to "Columbia Basin".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,546

 3,983

 3,708

 3,701

 4,405

 4,789

 5,197

 5,719

 4,787

 5,246

 4,704

 4,917

 4,817

 4,025

 4,015

 3,634

 4,618

 4,556

 3,817

 3,968

 4,353

 4,869

 4,282

 6,514

 3,592

 2,182

 1,391

 1,215

 1,192

 1,247

 1,220

 1,387

 1,516

 1,530

 1,613

 1,992

 2,039

 2,112

 2,216

 2,017

 1,757

 1,685

 1,466

 1,558

 1,618

 1,734

 1,738

 1,942

 2,023

 1,914

 1,977

 1,882

 1,936

 1,810

 1,660

 1,833

 1,015

 741

 669

 632

 712

 734

 2,255

 2,385

 2,474

 2,646

 3,011

 3,058

 3,195

 3,385

 3,033

 2,977

 2,916

 2,804

 2,938

 2,799

 2,678

 2,690

 3,026

 3,133

 2,753

 2,877

 2,816

 3,088

 2,832

 3,726

 2,693

 1,579

 1,112

 961

 901

 897

 914

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY 

AVG

MEAN

 30,820

 30,916

 31,378

 32,242

 33,507

 34,755

 35,874

 37,015

 37,616

 38,081

 38,419

 38,881

 39,445

 39,876

 40,299

 40,604

 41,156

 41,643

 41,385

 41,204

 40,825

 40,528

 40,327

 41,076

 40,853

 39,628

 37,802

 35,964

 34,187

 32,394

 30,282

 2,201

 2,208

 2,241

 2,303

 2,393

 2,483

 2,562

 2,644

 2,687

 2,720

 2,744

 2,777

 2,818

 2,848

 2,879

 2,900

 2,940

 2,975

 2,956

 2,943

 2,916

 2,895

 2,881

 2,934

 2,918

 2,831

 2,700

 2,569

 2,442

 2,314

 2,163

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6235 Filed 01/18/19 Entered 01/18/19 10:55:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6235 Filed 01/18/19 Entered 01/18/19 10:55:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6235 Filed 01/18/19 Entered 01/18/19 10:55:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANCE CARLSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-35917

D.C. No. 6:16-cv-00086-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 9, 2018** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BOUGH,*** District Judge.

 

Lance Carlson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action and its

order refusing to certify a question to the Montana Supreme Court. We affirm.

FILED

NOV 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.
Because sections 50-46-320(4)(b) and (5) of the Montana Marijuana Act

(MMA) state that the MMA does not prevent employers from prohibiting their

employees from using marijuana or authorize wrongful termination or

discrimination suits against employers, Mont. Code Ann. §§ 50-46-320(4)(b), (5),

the MMA does not preclude a federal contractor from complying with all the

requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act (DFWA), 41 U.S.C. § 8102. 

Therefore, the MMA is not preempted by the DFWA. See PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing,

564 U.S. 604, 620 (2011); Crosby v. Nat’l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363,

373 (2000).

Nevertheless, sections 50-46-320(4)(b) and (5) do not violate the Montana

constitution; rather, they survive rational basis review because they are rationally

related to Montana’s legitimate state interest in providing “careful regulation of

access to an otherwise illegal substance for limited use by persons for whom there

is little or no other effective alternative” while “avoid[ing] entanglement with

federal law.” Mont. Cannabis Indus. Ass’n v. State, 368 P.3d 1131, 1143 (Mont.

2016). Although a congressional appropriations rider currently restricts the

Department of Justice from spending funds to prosecute individuals who comply

with state marijuana laws, see United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163, 1169,

2
1179 (9th Cir. 2016), this temporary rule does not undercut Montana’s legitimate

state interests. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Carlson’s request to

certify the question whether sections 50-46-320(4)(b) and (5) are constitutional to

the Montana Supreme Court, because it is not an unclear question of state law

appropriate for certification. See Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chi. Title Ins.

Co., 793 F.3d 1087, 1089 (9th Cir. 2015).

AFFIRMED.

3
EXHIBIT 32






CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE


OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 14, 2010
/s/ CECIL BOND KYTECecil Bond KyteChief Executive OfficerDate: May 14, 2010
/s/ EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene E. EichlerInterim Chief Financial Officer
§ 99.33 What limitations apply to the redisclosure of information? ( a ) ( 1 ) An educational agency or institution may disclose personally identifiable information from an education record only on the condition that the party to whom the information is disclosed will not disclose the information to any other party without the prior consent of the parent or eligible student.
( 2 ) The officers, employees, and agents of a party that receives information under paragraph (a)(1) of this section may use the information, but only for the purposes for which the disclosure was made.
( b ) ( 1 ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not prevent an educational agency or institution from disclosing personally identifiable information with the understanding that the party receiving the information may make further disclosures of the information on behalf of the educational agency or institution if— ( i ) The disclosures meet the requirements of § 99.31; and
( ii ) ( A ) The educational agency or institution has complied with the requirements of § 99.32(b); or
( B ) A State or local educational authority or Federal official or agency listed in § 99.31(a)(3) has complied with the requirements of § 99.32(b)(2).
( 2 ) A party that receives a court order or lawfully issued subpoena and rediscloses personally identifiable information from education records on behalf of an educational agency or institution in response to that order or subpoena under § 99.31(a)(9) must provide the notification required under § 99.31(a)(9)(ii).
( c ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to disclosures under §§ 99.31(a)(8), (9), (11), (12), (14), (15), and (16), and to information that postsecondary institutions are required to disclose under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, 20 U.S.C. 1092(f) (Clery Act), to the accuser and accused regarding the outcome of any campus disciplinary proceeding brought alleging a sexual offense.
( d ) An educational agency or institution must inform a party to whom disclosure is made of the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section except for disclosures made under §§ 99.31(a)(8), (9), (11), (12), (14), (15), and (16), and to information that postsecondary institutions are required to disclose under the Clery Act to the accuser and accused regarding the outcome of any campus disciplinary proceeding brought alleging a sexual offense.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(b)(4)(B))
[53 FR 11943, Apr. 11, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 59297, Nov. 21, 1996; 65 FR 41853, July 6, 2000; 73 FR 74853, Dec. 9, 2008; 76 FR 75642, Dec. 2, 2011]
### §4086. Termination of relief authority

No import relief may be provided under this part with respect to any article after the date that is 5 years after the date on which the Agreement enters into force.

(Pub. L. 109–53, title III, §326, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 494.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Section effective on the date the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 1, 2006) and to cease to have effect on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, and, during any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA–DR country, to cease to have effect with respect to such country, see section 107 of Pub. L. 109–53, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.
CERTIFICATION





I, Van
der Bok Busboom, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  U.S. Canadian
Minerals, Inc. (formerly known as Barrington Foods International,
Inc.);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





August
14, 2008








/s/ 
Van der Bok
Busboom


Van der
Bok Busboom


Chief
Financial Officer