alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,162.64

 1,162.61

 1,162.59

 1,162.58

 1,162.56

 1,162.55

 1,162.52

 1,162.49

 1,162.46

 1,162.43

 1,162.40

 1,162.37

 1,162.34

 1,162.32

 1,162.29

 1,162.27

 1,162.24

 1,162.22

 1,162.19

 1,162.17

 1,162.14

 1,162.13

 1,162.10

 1,162.07

 1,162.04

 1,162.02

 1,162.00

 1,161.98

 1,161.96

 1,161.94

 1,161.91

 8.30

 8.28

 8.27

 8.26

 8.25

 8.25

 8.23

 8.21

 8.20

 8.18

 8.16

 8.15

 8.13

 8.12

 8.10

 8.09

 8.07

 8.06

 8.05

 8.03

 8.02

 8.01

 8.00

 7.98

 7.96

 7.95

 7.94

 7.93

 7.92

 7.91

 7.89

STORAGE

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

CHANGE

5

1

1

4

-1

8

3

6

1

3

5

6

3

5

3

6

4

6

3

5

3

8

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

4

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 10

 10

 10

 5

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

OUTLET

 10

 9

 6

 6

 4

 1

 2

 5

 5

 5

 6

 8

 5

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 6

 3

 4

 4

 5

 3

 5

C.F.S.

 .53

 .48

 .35

 .31

 .22

 .04

 .13

 .28

 .28

 .30

 .31

 .43

 .29

 .24

 .26

 .27

 .31

 .29

 .28

 .25

 .20

 .21

 .21

 .28

 .31

 .18

 .25

 .24

 .26

 .17

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/29/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.47 126 194 0 153 8.46 .10

ACRE-FEET -470 250 385 0 303

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 385

 385

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .10

JULY 1, 2014 .10

 8.31
| | EXHIBIT 32.2 | 
| | ------------ | 

|
|

| | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

|In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICrystal, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, David Loflin, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
      States Code), that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

|
|

|Dated: May 23, 2005. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN | 
|-------------------- | ---------------- | 

| | David Loflin | 
| | ------------ | 

| | Acting Chief Financial Officer | 
| | ------------------------------ |
#### Henry Lee, Respondent, v. Frederick Lavigna, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Westchester county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
§ 75.260 Allotments and reallotments. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70329 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Under some of the programs covered by this part, the Secretary allots funds under a statutory or regulatory formula.
( b ) Any reallotment to other grantees will be made by the Secretary in accordance with the authorizing statute for that program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 27804, July 24, 1987]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNVS00560 L58530000.EU0000 241A; N-81926 et al.; 11-08807; TAS: 14X5232]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends a Notice of Realty Action which published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 11, 2009 [74 FR 46790] and a Notice of Amendment to Notice of Realty Action which published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 20, 2010, [75 FR 28278]. This Notice of Correction is published to correct the mineral estate to be reserved to the United States upon patent issuance for 5 sale parcels N-78190, N-81926, N-81927, N-81930, and N-86661. The individual patents, when issued, will contain a mineral reservation to the United States for oil, gas, sodium, potassium, and all saleable minerals.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Manuela Johnson at (702) 515-5224, or                         *e-mail: manuela_johnson@blm.gov.*

Vanessa L. Hice,

Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands.

Authority:43 CFR 2711.

[FR Doc. 2011-841 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
No. 21549.

#### Joe T. Richardson, et al., *v.*Applewood Village.

(400 P.2d 433)

Decided March 22, 1965.

*502Bowman, Shambaugh, Geissinger & Wright, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This writ of error raises the question as to whether the above named plaintiffs in error are precluded from asserting an interest in a parcel of land, because of the foreclosure of a second deed of trust which was placed of record prior to the date on which they acquired any interest in the subject property.

The Richardsons, in conjunction with numerous other persons and corporations, were named defendants in an action commenced by John T. Faulkner to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Numerous other liens were claimed by divers and sundry materialmen and suppliers of work and labor on various pieces of property including Lot 6 in which the Richardsons claimed an interest. It is admitted that all the mechanics’ liens were released in so far as Lot 6 was concerned, but counsel for the Richard-sons contend that the investment which they had made in acquiring title to Lot 6 was a lien upon the real estate, which was not cut off by the foreclosure of the aforementioned second deed of trust.

In proceedings conducted before the trial court it was admitted that Lot 6 was subject to a first and second deed of trust for some time prior to the date upon which the Richardsons paid to the Kentz Construction Company the sum of $3,800.00 as an initial payment for the erection of a dwelling. The construction company con*503veyed title to the Richardsons and thereafter failed to perform its building contract.

Applewood Village, defendant in error above named, proceeded to foreclose the second deed of trust and secured a trustee’s deed. The trial court adjudged that this foreclosure proceeding cut off all the rights which otherwise might have been asserted by the Richardsons. In this conclusion the trial court was correct.

There is nothing presented in the record before us warranting reversal of the judgment, and it accordingly is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle and Mr. Justice Day not participating.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 350

 353

 370

 365

 370

 364

 353

 350

 347

 339

 332

 325

 318

 320

 315

 303

 296

 298

 292

 285

 284

 276

 274

 270

 275

 276

 265

 265

 265

 260

 337

 325

 333

 337

 336

 345

 326

 328

 328

 309

 310

 306

 303

 289

 284

 277

 272

 271

 262

 261

 265

 254

 264

 261

 259

 256

 252

 245

 244

 242

 343

 343

 349

 355

 359

 353

 342

 339

 334

 328

 321

 316

 313

 307

 300

 294

 288

 284

 278

 274

 270

 267

 267

 265

 266

 264

 259

 256

 255

 253

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 24.210 Classes of wine other than standard wine. The following classes of wine are not standard wine: ( a ) High fermentation wine, produced as provided in § 24.212;
( b ) Heavy bodied blending wine, produced as provided in § 24.213;
( c ) Spanish type blending sherry, produced as provided in § 24.214;
( d ) Wine products not for beverage use, produced as provided in § 24.215;
( e ) Distilling material, produced as provided in § 24.216;
( f ) Vinegar stock, produced as provided in § 24.217; and
( g ) Wines other than those in classes listed in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), of this section produced as provided in § 24.218.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1387, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5388))
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

IN RE:

 CASE NO. 20-12322-KHK

Dynamic Sports Performance, LLC CHAPTER 11

VERIFIED STATEMENT OF SUBCHAPTER V TRUSTEE

In connection with the United States Trustee’s Notice of Appointment of me as 

Subchapter V trustee in this proceeding, I hereby verify that I am a “disinterested person” as 

defined by 11 U.S.C. §101(14) in that I:

(a) am not a creditor, equity security holder or insider of the debtor;

(b) am not, and was not, within two years before the date of filing of the 

petition, a director, officer, or employee of the debtor; and

(c) do not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of 

any class of creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or 

indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the debtor, or for 

any other reason.

Subject to court approval pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330, I anticipate seeking compensation 

for my service in this case at an hourly rate of $500, in addition to seeking reimbursement for 

any actual and necessary expenses I incur. 

I hereby accept my appointment as subchapter V trustee in this case pursuant to FRBP 

2008.

Dated: October 22, 2020 /s/ Jolene Wee

Jolene Wee

JW Infinity Consulting, LLC

447 Broadway Street 2nd FL #502

New York, NY 10013

T: 646.204.0033 | F: 646.810.3989

E: jwee@jw-infinity.com

Case 20-12322-KHK Doc 7-1 Filed 10/22/20 Entered 10/22/20 17:49:39 Desc

Verified Statement of Subchapter V Trustee Page 1 of 1
p. 1 

## ,3C5,Y 7,3 

# zoo~-o

S-3 RECEIVED ;" r t XPT I I MAR 10 AM 6

: 39 Document Control Office (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U .S . Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 

# ~4ui0~rryiwi0

~o0 piu~d0 ,~iimi~u 8 March 2011 VIA COURIER

RE : TSCA §4 Test Rule, 40CFR 799.5087, CAS# 68187-84-8, "Castor Oil, Oxidized" EPA Docket No. : EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Dear Sir or Madam

: Vertellus Specialties Inc. hereby provides a letter of intent to conduct testing under the TSCA §4 Test Rule recently promulgated at 40 CFR 799.5087, "Chemical testing requirements for second group of high production volume chemicals (HPV2)" . Vertellus plans to conduct this testing ONLY for the chemical substance identified as "Castor Oil, Oxidized" (CAS# 68187-84-8) . We understand that this rule requires the following testing for this substance:

A1 Freezing Point A2 Boiling Point B Ready Biodegradation E1 Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (in vitro) 

### E2 One of the following: " In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test, or " Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosomal Aberration Test, or " Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test F1 One of the following sets: 

### " Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test or, " Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test and Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents At this point, Vertellus has no knowledge of a consortiumexisting or being formed to perform this testing. Vertellus requests that EPA provide us with the names of any companies that respond to this test rule with an intent to test, so that we can work together to prevent duplication of testing. We understand that final reports and robust summaries are due to the Agency by 7 March 2012, and we will alert you immediately if we foresee any problems in meeting that schedule. N

FirmSponsoring Testing: Vertellus Specialties Inc. Address: 201 N. Illinois Street, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 ~ Telephone: 317-247-8141

~ ~ RESPONSIBLE CARE OUR -M1rMENr -Us*A1NA

.1L

# CONTAINS NOCBl 

# v'VertellusVertellus Specialties Inc. 201 N Illinois Street

Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone. 317 247 8141 Fax. 317 248 6472 www .vertellus .comp. 2 EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531

4 March 2011 Page 2 of 2 

### Technical Contact: Misty L. Bogle Corporate Health, Safety & Product Stewardship Manager Technical Contact Address: 201 N . Illinois Street, Suite 1800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Technical Contact Telephone: 317-248-6548 ~ Technical Contact Email : mbogle@vertellus .com

If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact me at (317) 248-6548 or by e-mail at mboale@vertellus .com . 

### Sincerely, Misty L. BogTe Corporate Health, Safety & Product Stewardship Manager Regulatory Management MLB/mlb cc: file T. Pensak
# NEW FLIGHT MODE FEATURES

FOLLOW ME IN HOME MODE When the Follow Me feature is enabled in Home Mode (when ST10 is connected to 6 or more satellites), the Q500 Typhoon will fly back in a straight line in the direction of the pilots’ current location, and automatically land within 13-26 ft (4-8m) of the pilot.



### PILOT LOCATION 13-26 ft (4-8m) LANDING LOCATION 

# FOLLOW ME IN SMART MODE When the Follow Me feature is enabled in Smart Mode, it allows the Q500 Typhoon to take off in any orientation (with the nose toward you, away from you or toward the right or left). It also allows the pilot to move position, while controlling the direction of the Q500 based on the direction of the right-hand control stick (always facing the aircraft).

When using the Follow Me feature, keep in mind that the aircraft will maintain a constant altitude and can not detect obstacles. Pilots who change their altitude by for example, moving to higher ground, during flight should be mindful of this.

IMPORTANT NOTE: When the ST10 Personal Ground Station is connected to less then 6 satellites, the features described in this addendum will disable and the system will respond as is described in the Quickstart Guide. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information on this page is an addendum to the Quickstart Guide, and describes features that are enabled in SMART MODE and HOME MODE when the ST10 Personal Ground Station connects to 6 or more satellites.

The number of satellites is displayed on the top of the ST10 Interface. Model: Q500 Welcome,Pilot 07:25

GPS N/A

SAT N/A

POS N/A E N/A N MODE N/A

ALT N/A ft VOLTS N/A V

G-SPD N/A mph
DIS N/A ft

System Settings Flight Settings Model Select HOME 48F 6 

# 6

ACTIVATING THE FOLLOW ME FEATURE The Follow Me feature allows the Q500 Typhoon to follow the pilot, adjusting its location to the location of the ST10. The Follow Me feature is enabled when the number of connected satellites is 6 or more. When Follow Me is active the Q500's Main LED Status Indicator will blink white every three seconds. If the Q500’s Main LED Status Indicator remains solid green, the Follow Me feature is not enabled. WARNING: **ONLY USE FOLLOW ME IN FLAT, OPEN AREAS WITHOUT TREES, BUILDINGS OR OTHER OBJECTS AROUND!**
#### Malachi Nolan, Appellant, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Respondent.

— Judgment of the County Court of Westchester county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. The complaint shows that in connection with the *repairing*of the street a temporary crosswalk was provided for the public; that defendant either placed a dangerous obstruction on this walk or, with notice of the obstruction so placed, negligently suffered it to remain there, so that plaintiff, while lawfully walking over such crosswalk, was caused to trip and fall over such obstruction. This made a cause of action. *(Finkle*v. *Village of Valatie,*114 App. Div. 251.) Jenks, P. J., Carr and Putnain, *JJ.,*concurred; Burr and Staple ton, JJ., dissented.
May 31 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KASSIM LAWAL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00705

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for

observa nce.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thinh Tran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Sigma Designs, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sigma Designs, Inc.



|    |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/     THINH
TRAN                                          
|    |  | Thinh Tran                                                  
|    |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 20, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,194.79

 1,194.78

 1,194.79

 1,194.78

 1,194.76

 1,194.76

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.73

 1,194.72

 1,194.72

 1,194.72

 1,194.73

 1,194.77

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.76

 1,194.76

 1,194.75

 1,194.75

 1,194.76

 1,194.77

 1,194.78

 1,194.83

 1,194.85

 1,194.86

 1,194.87

 42.47

 42.45

 42.47

 42.45

 42.42

 42.42

 42.41

 42.41

 42.37

 42.36

 42.36

 42.36

 42.37

 42.44

 42.41

 42.41

 42.41

 42.41

 42.41

 42.42

 42.42

 42.41

 42.41

 42.42

 42.44

 42.45

 42.53

 42.57

 42.58

 42.60

STORAGE

-0.03

-0.02

+0.02

-0.02

-0.03

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.03

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.07

-0.03

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.08

+0.03

+0.02

+0.02

CHANGE

1

7

23

5

0

16

8

6

-7

-2

6

4

14

35

-12

4

3

4

3

11

1

-3

5

11

12

10

42

21

11

13

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 4

 3

 1

 1

 3

 3

 3

 5

 9

 5

 5

 3

 5

 1

 3

 3

 2

 3

 2

 2

 0

 4

 4

 2

 3

 1

 0

 3

 2

 4

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .10

 .17

 .09

 .09

 .06

 .10

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .07

 .07

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .03

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .07

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .02

 .16

 .17

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/11/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.12 252 114 0 89 1.61 1.00

ACRE-FEET +120 500 226 0 177

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 226

 226

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.00

JULY 1, 2006 1.07

 42.50
(No. 6668

#### Thelma L. Beall, Executor of the Estate of Lawrence Beall, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Thomson, Thomson, Mirza and Zanoni, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. *17Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.