alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rub Investments Limited (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed  with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,
Anthony  N  DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



                              /s/ Anthony N. DeMint
                              Anthony n. DeMint
                              President and Chief Accounting Officer
                              August 4, 2003
'" .. 

ta11J 

.. tiiEJ .. eD· 

Organized Village ofKake P~o. Box 316 . · · 

Kake,· Alaska 99830-0316. ·~'' 

Telephone 907 -7~5~64 71 

· .............. . · .......... . _'""······ 

....... ·· 

--~····-1 ... ·· . 

Fax 907-785-4902 I www.KakeFirstNation.org 

(Federally Recognized Tribal Government serving the Kake, Alaska area) 

Michael Gormas . . . 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC20590 

May 29,2014 

RE: Essential Air Service Provider for Kake Alaska · 

Dear Mr. Gormas: 

, ... •' 

There are many important considerations, such as safety, cost to travelers, s.cheduling, reliability, and 

. certainly other factors; · IFR flights has been a request for many years· and its good to have that as an 

offering. · · 

. ~ 

By a majority vote of the OVK council, Harris Aircraft Services was selected for recommendation to be awarded the EAS award .. One consideration is local employment for our citizens and with that in 

mind we urge that if they are selected by DOT for the EAS award, that local workers ate not unduly 

affected by loss of employment. · · 

...... 

Given Kake' s rurallocatiori without road access, reliable air service is truly essential to our day-to-day 

life and the title of the EAS program is aptly named and vitaily needed. We trust that your office will· 

work with the selected airline offering services under EAS, so that they may do so in a manner that not 

only fulfills Kake's needs, but also allows them to operate in a fiscally viable manners- for that to 

occur, we thank the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Department of Transportation for the Essential Air 

Service Subsidy Program that is so critical in rural communities such as Kake, Alaska. · 

In closing, we wish to thank your office for its willingness to work with us and to seek community 

comment on the Essential Air Service contract award. If any additional infor:rllation or comments may 

be needed please advise; and as we move into the future, please keep our tribal government office in 

the decision process for matters related to this important service. · 

Sincerely, 

~~~c_S;2 Casimero A. Aceveda 

President:, 

cc: Michael Martin, U.S. DOT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 388.70

 388.70

 389.26

 390.00

 390.76

 391.54

 392.47

 393.24

 393.68

 394.17

 394.74

 395.24

 395.72

 396.04

 396.66

 396.95

 397.25

 397.54

 397.84

 398.16

 398.17

 398.17

 398.17

 398.13

 398.09

 398.14

 398.46

 398.78

 398.86

 398.86

 435,974

 435,974

 440,144

 445,676

 451,384

 457,270

 464,325

 470,196

 473,564

 477,324

 481,712

 485,574

 489,291

 491,776

 496,602

 498,866

 501,212

 503,483

 505,837

 508,352

 508,431

 508,431

 508,431

 508,116

 507,802

 508,195

 510,714

 513,239

 513,870

 513,870

 0

 0

 3,375

 1,496

 0

 2,968

 2,920

 2,914

 2,895

 2,879

 2,891

 2,872

 2,858

 2,823

 2,740

 2,689

 2,683

 669

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 5, 2014

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2013 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 80,123 0 5,783 28,357

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 2,227

 0

 4,170

 5,532

 5,708

 5,886

 7,055

 5,871

 3,368

 3,760

 4,388

 3,862

 3,717

 2,485

 4,826

 2,264

 2,346

 2,271

 2,354

 2,515

 79

 0

 0

-315

-314

 393

 2,519

 2,525

 631

 0

 199

 225

 188

 188

 200

 182

 179

 218

 207

 190

 211

 193

 220

 182

 131

 139

 136

 212

 125

 192

 167

 180

 201

 213

 197

 170

 157

 174

 142

 465

-251

-124

2,689

904

-616

2,464

2,472

2,428

2,522

2,485

2,449

2,220

2,455

2,538

2,241

2,342

2,379

293

-296

-261

-56

-99

-111

-259

-410

-1,207

-244

-225

-109

-256

ELEV STORAGE

 39,672

 251,099

 250,975

 253,664

 254,568

 253,952

 256,416

 258,888

 261,316

 263,838

 266,323

 268,772

 270,992

 273,447

 275,985

 278,226

 280,568

 282,947

 283,240

 282,944

 282,683

 282,627

 282,528

 282,417

 282,158

 281,748

 280,541

 280,297

 280,072

 279,963

 279,707

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 251,350

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 202

 205

 204

 205

 211

 217

 220

 231

 225

 227

 237

 234

 238

 318

 398

 411

 424

 237

 244

 216

 209

 186

 181

 184

 201

 198

 207

 212

 197

 195

 197

 200

 204

 208

 212

 217

 217

 202

 219

 219

 219

 220

 223

 225

 216

 211

 206

 203

 184

 172

 163

 170

 172

 176

 191

 189

 198

 200

 199

 202

 207

 213

 217

 220

 220

 221

 226

 225

 225

 243

 256

 265

 252

 222

 216

 210

 197

 179

 173

 176

 183

 188

 195

 199

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 30, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,704

 2,712

 2,722

 2,733

 2,748

 2,769

 2,795

 2,824

 2,854

 2,885

 2,919

 2,945

 2,971

 3,016

 3,074

 3,139

 3,192

 3,212

 3,221

 3,218

 3,198

 3,157

 3,110

 3,065

 3,022

 2,985

 2,955

 2,911

 193

 194

 194

 195

 196

 198

 200

 202

 204

 206

 209

 210

 212

 215

 220

 224

 228

 229

 230

 230

 228

 226

 222

 219

 216

 213

 211

 208

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Comparison of Equalization Tank Cost and Pond Cost

This Excel file contains the following worksheets:

EQ Tank Cost

This Excel workbook documents the comparison of the cost to install an equalization tank versus the cost of 

continuing to operate a dedicated FGD pond.

For the group of plants identified as high flow FGD plants (flow > 1,000 gpm), EPA identified those plants that 

operated a dedicated FGD pond as described in the Costs and Loads Report (DCN SE01957). EPA then 

compared the estimated cost of an equalization tank (and associated equipment including mixer and electricity) 

needed to handle the FGD wastewater to the estimated cost savings that would result from no longer operating 

the pond. The estimated pond savings costs are equivalent to the cost associated with operating the current 

pond as is.

EPA chose two plants with dedicated FGD ponds and pulled the version 2 costs associated 

with the equalization tank, mixer, and electricity required to operate the mixer. EPA then 

annualized the equalization tank costs and compared them to the estimated pond savings 

cost. In both cases the pond savings cost was lower than the equalization tank cost.
Plant ID CBI EQ Tank Cost EQ Tank Mixer Cost EQ Tank Elec EQ Tank Annualized Total

5762 FALSE $1,337,276 $469,469 $42,522 $213,065.49

9391 FALSE $1,333,519 $466,908 $42,290 $212,237.13
Pond O&M Savings

$179,906.02

$210,476.07
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.94-T Alkylate. ( a ) *API gravity at 60 °F.* 70.4.
( b ) *Reid vapor pressure (PSI).* 5.60 maximum.
( c ) *Distillation ( °F):* ( i ) *I.B.P.* 109.0.
( ii ) *10 percent.* 186.6.
( iii ) *50 percent.* 221.1.
( iv ) *90 percent.* 271.8.
( v ) *End point distillation.* 375.7.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59461, Aug. 30, 2016]
- 283 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS

Cite as 302 Neb. 283

U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, 

a corporation, appellee, v. 

D S Avionics Unlimited

LLC, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 15, 2019. No. S-17-1101.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly

R. Stratman, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion 

modified. Motions for rehearing overruled.

Thomas M. Locher, of Locher, Pavelka, Dostal, Braddy & 

Hammes, L.L.C., for appellant.

Robert E. O’Connor, Jr., for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, and

Papik, JJ., and Johnson, District Judge.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motions for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, and the appellee, U.S. 

Specialty Insurance Company, concerning our opinion in U.S. 

Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics.

1

 We overrule the motions, 

but we modify the opinion as follows:

1 U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics, 301 Neb. 388, 918 N.W.2d 589 

(2018).

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

02/15/2019 08:05 AM CST
- 284 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS

Cite as 302 Neb. 283

In the “Declaratory Judgment Was Premature” subsection, 

we strike the third sentence of the first paragraph, including 

footnote 14.2 Also in the same subsection, after the fourth 

sentence of the second paragraph,3 we insert the following sentence: “‘This rule embraces not only cases where the identical issues between the same parties are sub judice, but also 

possibly cases in which the issues only are identical but not 

the parties.’”4

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

 Motions for rehearing overruled.

2 Id. at 398, 918 N.W.2d at 596.

3 Id. at 399, 918 N.W.2d at 596.

4 Strawn v. County of Sarpy, 146 Neb. 783, 788, 21 N.W.2d 597, 600 

(1946).
### §1319a. Duty on coffee; ratification of duties imposed by Legislature of Puerto Rico

The taxes and duties imposed by the Legislature of Puerto Rico by Joint Resolution Numbered 59 approved by the Governor of Puerto Rico May 5, 1930, and by Act Numbered 77 approved by the Governor of Puerto Rico May 5, 1931, as amended by Act Numbered 7 approved by the Governor April 9, 1934, including therein such taxes and duties on coffee brought into Puerto Rico from any State or Territory or district or possession of the United States, or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, are legalized and ratified, and the collection of all such taxes and duties made under or by authority of either of said acts of the Puerto Rican Legislature, including such taxes and duties on coffee brought into Puerto Rico from any State, Territory, district, or possession of the United States, or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, is legalized, ratified, and confirmed as fully to all intents and purposes as if the same had, by prior Act of Congress, been specifically authorized and directed.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 604, 48 Stat. 1017; Aug. 20, 1935, ch. 578, 49 Stat. 665.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of Tariff Act of 1930 which constitutes this chapter.

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 20, 1935, amended section generally.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 444.25

 443.60

 442.99

 442.46

 442.02

 441.55

 441.09

 440.60

 440.07

 439.75

 439.39

 438.99

 438.63

 438.32

 437.95

 437.51

 437.24

 437.07

 436.88

 436.72

 436.57

 436.32

 436.01

 435.88

 435.89

 435.77

 435.56

 435.37

 435.14

 434.90

 434.71

 747.7

 741.3

 735.4

 730.2

 725.9

 721.3

 716.9

 712.1

 707.0

 704.0

 700.5

 696.7

 693.3

 690.3

 686.8

 682.7

 680.1

 678.5

 676.7

 675.2

 673.8

 671.5

 668.6

 667.4

 667.4

 666.3

 664.4

 662.6

 660.5

 658.2

 656.5

STORAGE

-5.9

-6.4

-6.0

-5.2

-4.3

-4.6

-4.5

-4.7

-5.1

-3.1

-3.4

-3.8

-3.4

-2.9

-3.5

-4.2

-2.5

-1.6

-1.8

-1.5

-1.4

-2.3

-2.9

-1.2

+0.1

-1.1

-2.0

-1.8

-2.1

-2.2

-1.8

CHANGE

1,849

1,424

1,541

1,644

1,994

1,684

1,712

1,322

1,113

1,662

1,306

1,183

1,420

1,485

1,160

1,108

1,573

1,760

1,519

1,672

1,704

1,230

916

1,549

2,384

1,557

1,160

1,426

1,084

1,154

1,252

INFLOW

 4,460

 4,278

 4,190

 3,884

 3,788

 3,632

 3,603

 3,348

 3,347

 2,880

 2,728

 2,814

 2,872

 2,686

 2,637

 2,909

 2,575

 2,266

 2,166

 2,134

 2,134

 2,132

 2,146

 1,894

 1,957

 1,744

 1,795

 1,977

 1,859

 1,940

 1,819

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 294

 294

 293

 289

 284

 282

 284

 286

 277

 264

 242

 239

 219

 218

 219

 221

 211

 212

 187

 222

 198

 212

 173

 198

 287

 283

 276

 266

 258

 266

 260

PUMPING

 85

 78

 78

 78

 87

 68

 74

 71

 64

 64

 73

 60

 54

 66

 76

 72

 72

 91

 66

 72

 81

 68

 62

 68

 93

 93

 74

 74

 46

 71

 58

C.F.S.

 .26

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .27

 .21

 .23

 .22

 .20

 .20

 .23

 .19

 .17

 .21

 .24

 .23

 .23

 .29

 .21

 .23

 .26

 .22

 .20

 .22

 .30

 .30

 .24

 .24

 .15

 .23

 .19

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 8, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -97.1 45,547 84,594 0 0 7,714 2,237 7.09 .00

ACRE-FEET -97,100 90,342 167,792 0 0 15,301 4,437

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 167,792

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 15,301

TOTAL 183,093

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = .00

 753.7

OUTLET 0 .00
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 81151          Scale: 25,010          Edition: 7          Edition Date: 11-AUG-07          CORRECTED TO NTM:  2007/39**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,122

 1,106

 1,087

 1,041

 1,010

 987

 952

 1,008

 987

 973

 971

 960

 943

 936

 933

 988

 1,099

 1,150

 1,166

 1,155

 1,136

 1,153

 1,172

 1,153

 1,115

 1,103

 1,094

 1,113

 1,160

 1,249

 876

 735

 740

 677

 717

 799

 677

 764

 913

 909

 873

 853

 847

 862

 896

 903

 892

 900

 898

 884

 887

 810

 870

 839

 818

 808

 836

 841

 878

 914

 1,026

 1,010

 986

 952

 938

 924

 865

 912

 947

 941

 926

 918

 911

 909

 916

 937

 974

 1,009

 1,033

 1,040

 1,040

 1,025

 1,047

 1,040

 1,016

 1,005

 1,008

 1,002

 1,019

 1,057

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,209

 2,464

 2,285

 2,030

 3,240

 3,653

 4,205

 5,437

 6,018

 5,519

 5,150

 4,681

 5,268

 4,265

 4,633

 4,888

 5,726

 6,419

 6,642

 6,872

 7,220

 6,699

 6,788

 6,869

 6,129

 5,586

 5,692

 6,554

 5,501

 4,552

 4,999

 355

 339

 339

 313

 317

 365

 392

 392

 517

 441

 473

 480

 514

 553

 481

 546

 643

 592

 591

 590

 679

 653

 629

 850

 612

 413

 524

 953

 673

 565

 522

 887

 897

 756

 682

 1,094

 1,296

 1,623

 1,912

 2,270

 2,409

 2,163

 2,086

 1,952

 1,839

 2,034

 2,377

 2,599

 2,933

 3,075

 3,353

 3,642

 3,604

 3,752

 3,633

 2,989

 2,809

 3,249

 3,683

 2,807

 2,357

 2,156

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,252

 8,444

 8,479

 8,252

 8,399

 9,019

 10,642

 12,554

 14,824

 16,679

 18,213

 19,633

 20,835

 21,866

 23,013

 24,493

 26,336

 28,587

 30,568

 32,625

 34,644

 36,336

 37,818

 39,042

 39,868

 40,591

 41,888

 43,732

 44,505

 44,485

 44,042

 589

 603

 606

 589

 600

 644

 760

 897

 1,059

 1,191

 1,301

 1,402

 1,488

 1,562

 1,644

 1,750

 1,881

 2,042

 2,183

 2,330

 2,475

 2,595

 2,701

 2,789

 2,848

 2,899

 2,992

 3,124

 3,179

 3,178

 3,146

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 31.1
I, Henry J. Fuchs, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals,Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 12, 2005 /s/ Henry J. Fuchs   Henry J. Fuchs, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Elva  International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  [10-Q/10-QSB]  for the period ending  September 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Eric Danon, Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent thereof) of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                          /s/ Eric Danon
                          ------------------------------------------
                          Eric Danon
                          Chief Executive Officer, (or the equivalent thereof)
                          November 14, 2002
§ 76.302 The notice to the subgrantee. A State shall notify a subgrantee in writing of: ( a ) The amount of the subgrant;
( b ) The period during which the subgrantee may obligate the funds; and
( c ) The Federal requirements that apply to the subgrant.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0513) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[45 FR 22517, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 49143, Dec. 6, 1988]