alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 385.16

 385.12

 385.01

 384.88

 384.82

 384.73

 384.55

 384.42

 384.37

 384.25

 384.05

 383.86

 383.59

 383.46

 383.22

 383.10

 382.99

 382.82

 382.61

 382.36

 382.19

 382.08

 382.02

 382.04

 381.96

 381.89

 382.01

 383.52

 384.78

 385.16

 385.30

 288.8

 288.6

 288.0

 287.3

 287.0

 286.5

 285.5

 284.8

 284.5

 283.8

 282.7

 281.7

 280.2

 279.5

 278.2

 277.5

 276.9

 276.0

 274.9

 273.6

 272.6

 272.1

 271.7

 271.8

 271.4

 271.0

 271.7

 279.8

 286.7

 288.8

 289.6

STORAGE

-1.1

-0.2

-0.6

-0.7

-0.3

-0.5

-1.0

-0.7

-0.3

-0.7

-1.1

-1.0

-1.5

-0.7

-1.3

-0.7

-0.6

-0.9

-1.1

-1.3

-0.9

-0.6

-0.3

+0.1

-0.4

-0.4

+0.6

+8.1

+6.9

+2.1

+0.8

CHANGE

780

1,017

980

914

1,195

1,037

812

843

1,026

1,014

726

758

704

949

663

936

909

754

713

717

698

798

935

1,064

855

818

1,371

5,154

4,162

2,125

1,542

INFLOW

 1,257

 1,076

 1,227

 1,217

 1,294

 1,223

 1,258

 1,157

 1,111

 1,291

 1,205

 1,198

 1,368

 1,234

 1,243

 1,190

 1,143

 1,112

 1,173

 1,303

 1,080

 1,037

 1,037

 947

 1,001

 939

 924

 994

 627

 1,005

 1,077

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 2

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 3

 2

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 51

 54

 61

 59

 58

 59

 49

 41

 47

 52

 72

 79

 68

 65

 69

 66

 63

 65

 76

 75

 61

 58

 59

 63

 65

 61

 51

 50

 48

 48

 56

PUMPING

 7

 0

 2

 0

 9

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

 9

 7

 9

 9

 4

 37

 32

 16

 16

 0

 2

 0

 4

 5

 74

 2

 2

 7

 13

C.F.S.

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .02

 .21

 .18

 .09

 .09

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .42

 .01

 .01

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .26

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .01

 .27

 .03

 .14

 .87

 1.75

 .08

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -.3 36,969 34,948 16 0 1,849 297 1.66 3.78

ACRE-FEET -300 73,328 69,319 32 0 3,667 589

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 289.9

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 69,319

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 32

 3,667

TOTAL 73,018

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 7.50

OUTLET 0 3.78

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 7.50
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 397.82

 397.38

 396.88

 396.39

 395.89

 395.47

 395.05

 394.68

 394.29

 393.89

 393.41

 392.99

 392.67

 392.22

 391.77

 391.32

 390.86

 390.41

 389.96

 389.53

 389.08

 388.67

 388.26

 387.81

 387.39

 386.94

 386.46

 386.04

 385.67

 385.27

 384.90

 365.1

 362.3

 359.0

 355.9

 352.7

 350.1

 347.4

 345.1

 342.7

 340.2

 337.2

 334.6

 332.7

 329.9

 327.2

 324.5

 321.7

 319.1

 316.4

 313.9

 311.2

 308.8

 306.4

 303.8

 301.4

 298.9

 296.1

 293.8

 291.7

 289.5

 287.4

STORAGE

-2.5

-2.8

-3.2

-3.1

-3.2

-2.7

-2.7

-2.3

-2.4

-2.5

-3.0

-2.6

-2.0

-2.7

-2.7

-2.7

-2.8

-2.7

-2.7

-2.5

-2.6

-2.4

-2.4

-2.6

-2.4

-2.6

-2.7

-2.4

-2.1

-2.2

-2.1

CHANGE

469

429

254

303

153

325

222

349

265

219

293

266

270

231

243

234

164

157

195

304

127

280

306

26

275

194

299

228

291

366

328

INFLOW

 1,422

 1,596

 1,619

 1,623

 1,519

 1,439

 1,328

 1,273

 1,265

 1,220

 1,554

 1,336

 1,037

 1,388

 1,372

 1,371

 1,357

 1,285

 1,315

 1,362

 1,240

 1,285

 1,319

 1,139

 1,291

 1,287

 1,477

 1,238

 1,171

 1,353

 1,221

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 222

 229

 222

 223

 205

 199

 207

 199

 195

 195

 191

 198

 201

 210

 206

 200

 189

 194

 192

 192

 194

 181

 164

 178

 179

 179

 176

 173

 154

 139

 130

PUMPING

 70

 37

 37

 36

 36

 25

 25

 44

 33

 60

 41

 39

 16

 16

 40

 30

 10

 28

 37

 25

 27

 17

 23

 19

 19

 26

 15

 15

 9

 0

 15

C.F.S.

 .32

 .17

 .17

 .17

 .17

 .12

 .12

 .21

 .16

 .29

 .20

 .19

 .08

 .08

 .20

 .15

 .05

 .14

 .19

 .13

 .14

 .09

 .12

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .08

 .08

 .05

 .00

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .30

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 16, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -80.3 8,065 41,702 0 0 5,916 870 4.29 .47

ACRE-FEET -80,300 15,997 82,716 0 0 11,734 1,726

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 82,716

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 11,734

TOTAL 94,450

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = .91

 367.6

OUTLET 0 .47

Table 11
### SUBCHAPTER I—SCHOOL LIBRARY RESOURCES, TEXTBOOKS, AND OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 324

 326

 336

 343

 341

 308

 295

 287

 282

 269

 255

 257

 246

 243

 234

 228

 232

 230

 223

 224

 223

 221

 215

 209

 202

 192

 194

 190

 172

 169

 303

 305

 305

 301

 289

 267

 267

 264

 253

 239

 240

 227

 223

 212

 208

 210

 204

 206

 205

 205

 201

 193

 195

 187

 182

 177

 168

 163

 156

 150

 312

 314

 319

 318

 307

 284

 279

 274

 267

 254

 246

 238

 234

 225

 217

 217

 215

 217

 215

 213

 209

 207

 201

 193

 187

 183

 177

 170

 162

 155

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Re: Questions on I540 project

Ryan F. Brown 

t

o

:

Jesse Pritts 05/13/2011 01:09 PM

History: This message has been replied to.

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, <Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov> wrote:

Thanks Ryan for the responses to my questions. I have two quick

follow-up questions:

1. The table of turbidity values lists "Turbidity" and "Corrected

Turbidity". Could you elaborate on the difference?

The turbidity is the actual value from the machine. The corrected turbidity includes a 

calibration factor which is developed by a standard curve. The calibration factor is 

developed about ever month using knowns for the machine used to obtain turbidity.

The corrected turbidity is the true turbidity and should be the one used. Sorry for the 

confusion.

2. You indicated that a portion of the basin 3 water flows into basin 4.

Are there other flows entering basin 4, or is it only the basin 3 water

that flows into basin 4? If additional water other than the basin 3

water flows into basin 4, could you provide any estimate of the

proportion of the flow entering basin 4 that came from basin 3 as

opposed to other sources?

Yes, a majority of the water entering into basin 4 comes from the watershed. According to 

the flow data there was only one event where there were large flows came out of basin 3 

which was on 9/30/10 and represented approximately 32,500 gallons. Other than this there 

were small flows and flows over long periods of time and therefore the impact of these 

smaller outflows would more than likely not have dramatic effect on the level of sediment 

entering basin 4.

The known area of the catchment for basin 4 is limited to when surveys were taken. The 

catchment areas for the times that I have been comparing based on surveys taken during 

the period area listed below:

9.14.10-11.01.10= 1.82 Acres

11.01.10-12.14.10= 2.7 Acres

12.14.10-02.28.11= 3.16 Acres

Thank youJesse W. Pritts, P.E.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (4303T)

Washington, DC 20460

tel 202-566-1038

fax 202-566-1053

www.epa.gov/waterscience

Courier/FedEx:

1301 Constitution Ave., NW

Room 6233AA EPA West

Washington, DC 20004

-- 

Please Consider Donating and Fighting Against MS

Ryan F. Brown

Biological and Agricultural Engineering

NC State University

rfbrown@ncsu.edu

(803)-240-0059
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 742

 715

 697

 663

 631

 606

 563

 525

 509

 478

 452

 436

 421

 419

 399

 390

 388

 378

 350

 332

 304

 300

 301

 298

 299

 293

 295

 280

 284

 301

 293

 604

 616

 560

 519

 507

 490

 453

 442

 411

 416

 405

 389

 373

 362

 360

 346

 311

 287

 277

 268

 279

 265

 265

 263

 257

 248

 255

 244

 249

 245

 255

 695

 674

 653

 613

 585

 555

 523

 492

 469

 451

 433

 416

 400

 389

 379

 369

 356

 338

 321

 305

 293

 284

 279

 278

 276

 272

 272

 269

 270

 270

 271

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §753b. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 753a of this title.

(Pub. L. 86–686, §2, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 733.)
Exhibit 10.37


 





Loan Agreement


 


Agreement no.:2-034


 


Party
A:Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Party B:Jianlian Li


 


ID Card no.:441227197103107528


 


		一、	Terms Agreed



		1.	Party
                                         A obtains a loan of RMB15,000,000 from Party B for one year for Party A’s
                                         business development.



		2.	Party
                                         B agrees to offer the above mentioned amount of loan to Party A, and to transfer the
                                         amount of loan to the following account designated by Party A within five days from the
                                         date of signature of this agreement.



 


Bank name:Beijing Shilihe
Sub-branch, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China


 


Account
name: Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Account no.:0200049419200119632


 


		3.	Party
                                         A promises to repay the above mentioned amount of loan with corresponding interest to
                                         Party B in one year from the date of signature of this agreement. The annual interest
                                         rate of loan under this agreement is 10%.



		4.	Party
                                         A will not pay the interest to Party B in the event of repayment in advance by Party
                                         B before the expiration date of this agreement.



		二、	Term of validity



 


This agreement will come into
effect upon signature by both Parties, and is valid for one year.


 


		三、	Documentations



 


This agreement
is done in duplicate, and each Party holds one.


 


		四、	Governing laws
                                         and dispute settlement



 


This
agreement is subject to the laws of People’s Republic of
China, and any disputes relating to this agreement can be submitted by any Party to South China International Economic and Trade
Arbitration Commission for arbitration according to its rules of arbitration.


 






    	1



    	 



    

 


Agreement Signature Page


 


Party
A:Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Centre


 


Representative signature
& Stamp:/s/ Ren Xiaoheng


  


Date:


 


 


 


 


 


Party B:Jianlian
Li


 


Signature &
Stamp:/s/ Jianlian Li


 


Date:December
17, 2014




 


 






    	2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 418.18

 418.17

 418.15

 418.09

 418.06

 418.40

 418.88

 419.80

 420.41

 420.85

 421.28

 421.71

 421.96

 421.87

 421.45

 421.05

 420.60

 420.55

 421.18

 422.56

 423.67

 424.60

 425.51

 426.43

 427.30

 428.23

 429.15

 430.13

 431.46

 432.85

 674,740

 674,653

 674,478

 673,953

 673,691

 676,665

 680,872

 688,963

 694,348

 698,241

 702,054

 705,875

 708,100

 707,298

 703,564

 700,014

 696,028

 695,586

 701,167

 713,450

 723,388

 731,754

 739,975

 748,303

 756,211

 764,696

 773,121

 782,131

 794,415

 807,324

 584

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,383

 8,819

 8,766

 4,379

 4,378

 8,751

 4,360

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,343

 4,394

 8,339

 8,331

 8,323

 8,313

 8,277

 8,231

 7,184

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 14, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2012 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 132,934 0 10,611 159,392

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 350

-87

-175

-525

-262

 2,974

 4,207

 8,091

 5,385

 3,893

 3,813

 3,821

 2,225

-802

-3,734

-3,550

-3,986

-442

 5,581

 12,283

 9,938

 8,366

 8,221

 8,328

 7,908

 8,485

 8,425

 9,010

 12,284

 12,909

 197

 198

 180

 193

 337

 382

 367

 360

 333

 337

 354

 360

 363

 382

 449

 458

 442

 373

 418

 432

 430

 422

 418

 417

 410

 396

 351

 325

 319

 208

1,877

4,852

4,822

4,858

4,697

-836

9,111

11,335

8,388

3,982

3,935

8,309

8,103

-131

2,581

4,648

4,447

4,596

4,111

-548

-245

7,966

3,954

7,948

7,755

8,014

8,006

7,946

7,800

7,111

ELEV STORAGE

 114,155

 368,198

 373,050

 377,872

 382,730

 387,427

 386,591

 395,702

 407,037

 415,425

 419,407

 423,342

 431,651

 439,754

 439,623

 442,204

 446,852

 451,299

 455,895

 460,006

 459,458

 459,213

 467,179

 471,133

 479,081

 486,836

 494,850

 502,856

 510,802

 518,602

 525,713

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 366,321

1,500

5,000

5,000

5,200

5,000

0

5,000

3,000

0

0

0

0

4,000

0

3,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

56,700
(No. 74-CC-224

#### Leeps, Inc., Henry C. Meyer, and John M. Falasz, Jr., their attorney, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 17, 1974.*

Lane, Falasz, Pollman & Munday, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### David Laiken, Respondent, v. Rose Pollack et al., Doing Business under the Name of Henry A. Pollack *&*Co., et al., Appellants.

Order, on reargument, directing examination of defendant Henry A. Pollack, individually and as an officer of the corporate defendant, before trial and the production of books and papers thereat, pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, the examination to proceed on ten days’ notice. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
# Phantom 3 Pre - Flight Inspection Check List

Pre - Flight Check List  Visual inspection for defects  Batteries fully charged and checked - Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone , approved/compatible device  Props tightened and locked  SD card in camera  Lens cap removed (As necessary)  Antennae up and parallel  Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode  UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert from travel mode to flight mode or use the app  DJI Pilot app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad  Tap bar at top of app (Safe to Fly GPS) for full status  Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)  Minimum return height adjusted (check for tallest object and set accordingly)  UAS placed in safe laun ch and recover position  Home point reprogrammed via app  Area clear of people / obstructions Flight Check List  Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / Listen for defects  Confirm expected stick operation  Monitor batt ery power  Monitor signal strength  Keep line - of - sight with UAS

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic. o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of any electrical/power lines o Ensure atmospheric c onditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in the event an emergency landing is required
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 7 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RODNEY LYNN ZARATE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-2046 (D.C. No. CR 95-552 LH) (D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Zarate appeals from the without prejudice dismissal of an indictment, contending that the dismissal should have been with prejudice. The district court dismissed the indictment based upon the government’s noncompliance with the “30 day rule.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b) (generally, information or indictment must be filed within 30 days from arrest or service of summons); Aplt. App. 18, 47. The district court’s- 2 -

dismissal without prejudice under 18 U.S.C. § 3162(a)(1) is interlocutory and not an appealable order. United States v. Tsosie , 966 F.2d 1357, 1361-62 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 928 (1992). APPEAL DISMISSED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19147-19148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.
    Name: LIGO Laboratory Annual Review at Livingston Observatory for 
Physics.
    Date and Time: Monday, April 25, 2011; 8 a.m.-6:30 p.m.; Tuesday, 
April 26, 2011; 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, April 27, 2011; 8:15 a.m.-
11 a.m.
    Place: LIGO site at Livingston, Louisiana.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Thomas Carruthers, Program Director, Division of 
Physics, National Science Foundation, (703) 292-7373.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an evaluation of the project 
construction

[[Page 19148]]

for implementation of the AdvLIGO project to the National Science 
Foundation.

Agenda

Monday, April 25, 2011

8 a.m.-8:30 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
8:40 a.m.-10:35 a.m. Open--Welcome, Charge to Panel, AdvLIGO status,
10:45 p.m.-11:40 a.m. Open--AdvLIGO Technical status (1)
11:45 Lunch
12:30 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Open--AdvLIGO technical status (2), Installation 
status
1:30 p.m.-2:15 p.m. Open--Integration planning
3 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Open--AdvLIGO Project Performance & Mgmt Report
4:15 Open--Breakout sessions
5:55 p.m.-6:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

8 a.m.-11:45 a.m. Open--Break out sessions
11:45 a.m. Lunch
12:15 p.m.-3:45 p.m. Open--Tour
3:45 p.m.-4 p.m. Open--Breakout sessions
4:00 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

8 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Closed--Executive Session report writing
10:30 a.m.-11 a.m. Closed--Executive Session--closing address

    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material, including technical information on personnel. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 1, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8126 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 219

 238

 257

 299

 719

 510

 287

 215

 196

 160

 132

 148

 146

 164

 163

 153

 142

 139

 136

 132

 134

 138

 139

 138

 141

 146

 154

 154

 169

 160

 158

 190

 194

 197

 201

 215

 212

 198

 194

 147

 116

 117

 123

 128

 125

 117

 113

 108

 117

 121

 122

 126

 130

 134

 133

 135

 136

 140

 140

 140

 144

 144

 201

 205

 221

 232

 322

 286

 214

 205

 170

 132

 126

 129

 136

 137

 135

 135

 125

 125

 127

 126

 129

 134

 135

 136

 137

 140

 146

 147

 148

 148

 148

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,143

 3,099

 3,071

 3,056

 3,145

 3,199

 3,185

 3,162

 3,110

 3,023

 2,929

 2,847

 2,780

 2,716

 2,650

 2,580

 2,484

 2,377

 2,182

 2,022

 1,937

 1,866

 1,831

 1,835

 1,846

 1,857

 1,867

 1,877

 1,890

 1,903

 1,926

 225

 221

 219

 218

 225

 229

 228

 226

 222

 216

 209

 203

 199

 194

 189

 184

 177

 170

 156

 144

 138

 133

 131

 131

 132

 133

 133

 134

 135

 136

 138

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER