alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3903. Measures for the importation and exportation of rough diamonds

#### (a) Prohibition

The President shall prohibit the importation into, or exportation from, the United States of any rough diamond, from whatever source, that has not been controlled through the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme.

#### (b) Waiver

The President may waive the requirements set forth in subsection (a) with respect to a particular country for periods of not more than 1 year each, if, with respect to each such waiver—

(1) the President determines and reports to the appropriate congressional committees that such country is taking effective steps to implement the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme; or

(2) the President determines that the waiver is in the national interests of the United States, and reports such determination to the appropriate congressional committees, together with the reasons therefor.

(Pub. L. 108–19, §4, Apr. 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 633.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 15 of Pub. L. 108–19, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For assignment of functions of President under subsec. (b) of this section, see section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 13312, July 29, 2003, 68 F.R. 45151, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,376

 1,282

 1,255

 1,252

 1,229

 1,228

 1,234

 1,286

 1,359

 1,529

 1,557

 1,566

 1,547

 1,541

 1,477

 1,396

 1,357

 1,315

 1,296

 1,272

 1,353

 1,460

 1,561

 1,607

 1,612

 1,604

 1,597

 1,576

 1,558

 1,530

 1,476

 1,005

 975

 962

 972

 1,008

 1,003

 952

 987

 1,014

 1,023

 1,014

 1,025

 1,026

 1,066

 1,044

 1,013

 1,030

 1,023

 1,045

 1,038

 1,087

 1,090

 1,074

 1,087

 1,083

 1,053

 1,121

 1,131

 1,157

 1,167

 1,170

 1,182

 1,149

 1,106

 1,095

 1,104

 1,104

 1,120

 1,143

 1,157

 1,211

 1,231

 1,281

 1,269

 1,268

 1,249

 1,205

 1,191

 1,161

 1,180

 1,187

 1,211

 1,240

 1,277

 1,304

 1,323

 1,334

 1,347

 1,352

 1,351

 1,348

 1,343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5207

 To amend section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove 
 authorization to implement the Migrant Protection Protocols, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2019

   Mr. Vela introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove 
 authorization to implement the Migrant Protection Protocols, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End the Migrant Protection Protocols 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO IMPLEMENT THE MIGRANT PROTECTION PROTOCOLS 
              REMOVED.

    Section 235(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1225(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``subparagraphs (B) 
        and (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (B)'' ; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C).
                                 <all>
```
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    National compensation survey. State and local    government. Sioux City, IA-NE-SD [electronic resource].
 
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/15:SI 7/
Item    Number:0768-B-15    (online)
GPO    System Number: [if !vml]>[endif]> 000864834
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 15, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 309

 315

 318

 312

 300

 299

 303

 308

 299

 298

 304

 296

 291

 305

 290

 295

 292

 284

 278

 277

 278

 296

 295

 326

 379

 358

 371

 384

 355

 335

 339

 274

 275

 280

 281

 277

 276

 265

 263

 266

 269

 267

 268

 269

 270

 264

 252

 257

 251

 253

 252

 248

 244

 251

 265

 294

 305

 299

 316

 323

 283

 271

 288

 290

 293

 293

 287

 286

 282

 285

 281

 280

 284

 281

 278

 284

 277

 274

 272

 267

 264

 263

 262

 268

 272

 293

 328

 325

 324

 340

 338

 310

 285

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            DEBT SECURITIES RATING

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              At December 31, 2001
                                        ---------------------------------
                                         Standard    Moody's
                                         & Poor's   Investors
                                        Corporation  Service  Fitch, Inc.
                                        ----------- --------- -----------
       <S>                              <C>         <C>       <C>
       Household Finance Corporation
          Senior debt..................       A         A2          A
          Senior subordinated debt.....      A-         A3         A-
          Commercial paper.............     A-1        P-1        F-1
       Household Bank (Nevada), N.A.(1)
          Senior debt..................       A         A2          A
</TABLE>
--------
(1) On July 1, 2002, Household Bank (Nevada), N.A. was merged with and into
    Household Bank (SB), N.A.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Elva  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Zenyk
Horbowi, Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial
Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




Date: August 9, 2005            /s/ Zenyk Horbowi
                                -------------------
                                Zenyk Horbowi
                                Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                                Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)







----------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Chief Financial Officer of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 1992 and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63.

I, James E. Hines the Chief Financial
Officer of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. hereby certify that to my knowledge, EarthBlock
Technologies, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the annual report on Form 10-QSB
and the financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operations of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc.

Date: May  16, 2005

| |                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | EARTHBLOCK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BY: /s/ James E. Hines
James E. Hines
Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,117

 1,153

 1,158

 1,153

 1,191

 1,117

 1,026

 1,002

 986

 981

 971

 941

 929

 906

 921

 976

 1,004

 1,043

 1,038

 1,021

 1,009

 912

 874

 823

 841

 785

 801

 788

 761

 734

 718

 712

 942

 936

 903

 769

 811

 806

 725

 734

 688

 697

 744

 698

 685

 645

 665

 728

 612

 579

 517

 477

 449

 545

 444

 438

 460

 467

 509

 507

 481

 469

 995

 1,021

 1,018

 998

 952

 942

 921

 873

 858

 838

 832

 836

 808

 788

 775

 804

 839

 824

 810

 778

 749

 754

 703

 678

 651

 658

 659

 676

 668

 629

 585

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### Antidumping
#### McKEAN AUTO COMPANY, Respondent, v. G & G RUG & FURNITURE COMPANY, Appellant.

(269 N. W. 375.)

(File No. 7978.

Opinion filed October 26, 1936.)

*Cherry & Braithewaite,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*T. R. Johnson,*of Siioux Falls, for Respondent.

*595PER CURIAM.

On the afternoon of December 24, 1934, at about 5145 o’clock, the truck of defendant corporation, driven and operated upon its business by its employee, collided with the automobile of plaintiff corporation, driven and operated upon its business by its employee, at a street intersection in the city of Sioux Falls.

Claiming that defendant’s employee was negligent while its employee was free from fault, plaintiff instituted the present action in municipal court in the city of Sioux Falls to recover damage resulting to its motor vehicle from the collision. Defendant answered, pleading, inter alia, contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff’s servant, and the case was tried; to the court without a jury. Findings, conclusions, and judgment were in favor of plaintiff, awarding damages in the amount of $2x4.50, together with costs, from which judgment and from a denial of its application for new trial defendant has appealed.

Certain objections made by respondent to the form of appellant’s brief and to the sufficiency of appellant’s assignments of error are entirely without merit.

Appellant, conceding for the purposes of the appeal the negligence of its employee, maintains that the employee of respondent was guilty of contributory negligence, and, consequently, that there should be no recovery. To set forth the evidence or discuss it in detail seems unnecessary. Upon the undisputed facts, taking all the testimony introduced by respondent as unqualifiedly true, and assuming the negligence of appellant’s employee, we are convinced that respondent’s employee, fully accepting his own story as to his acts and conduct immediately prior to the collision, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The facts are not really controverted as to any important or material particulars, and they present a clear case where it must be said, we think, as a matter of law, that both drivers were negligent and that the negligence of each contributed to and constituted a part of the proximate cause of the collision, and neither party is entitled to recover against the other.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the trial judge to1 take appropriate steps in harmony with this opinion.

All the Judges concur.
December 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER PUMPING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHAN

GE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET PLANT C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

246.7

1 377.14 246.5 -0.2 1,191 1,214 0 0 53 0 0.00 0.95

2 377.06 246.1 -0.4 1,188 1,307 0 0 52 31 0.19 0.01

3 377.16 246.6 0.5 1,859 1,558 0 0 48 0 0.00 1.74

4 377.76 249.7 3.0 2,729 1,115 0 0 46 53 0.32 0.38

5 378.37 252.7 3.1 2,857 1,254 0 0 49 0 0.00 0.23

6 378.62 254.0 1.3 1,937 1,251 0 0 46 0 0.00 0.23

7 378.62 254.0 0.0 1,402 1,355 0 0 47 0 0.00 0.00

8 378.63 254.1 0.1 1,457 1,385 0 0 46 0 0.00 0.06

9 378.77 254.8 0.7 1,737 1,334 0 0 44 0 0.00 0.06

10 379.43 258.2 3.4 2,721 969 0 0 44 0 0.00 1.66

11 381.81 270.6 12.5 7,316 986 0 0 45 0 0.00 0.70

12 382.78 275.8 5.2 3,884 1,220 0 0 44 0 0.00 0.70

13 382.97 276.8 1.0 1,761 1,191 0 0 53 2 0.01 0.00

14 383.18 278.0 1.1 1,643 1,012 0 0 54 2 0.01 0.00

15 383.36 279.0 1.0 1,728 1,174 0 0 56 4 0.02 0.00

16 383.62 280.4 1.4 2,109 1,333 0 0 63 0 0.00 0.00

17 383.90 281.9 1.5 2,053 1,216 0 0 60 9 0.05 0.00

18 384.10 283.0 1.1 1,910 1,292 0 0 61 5 0.03 0.00

19 384.27 283.9 0.9 1,844 1,298 0 0 60 13 0.07 0.00

20 384.62 285.9 1.9 2,149 1,112 0 0 60 4 0.02 0.00

21 384.66 286.1 0.2 1,424 1,245 0 0 64 4 0.02 0.00

22 384.95 287.7 1.6 2,124 1,252 0 0 62 4 0.02 0.00

23 385.34 289.9 2.2 2,470 1,311 0 0 60 2 0.01 0.00

24 385.67 291.7 1.8 2,278 1,280 0 0 63 6 0.03 0.00

25 385.85 292.7 1.0 1,891 1,320 0 0 60 4 0.02 0.00

26 387.26 300.7 8.0 5,166 1,082 0 0 58 0 0.00 0.28

27 389.66 314.6 13.9 7,838 760 0 0 57 0 0.00 1.00

28 391.91 328.0 13.4 7,630 792 1 0 60 4 0.02 0.00

29 393.06 335.1 7.0 7,172 3,571 8 0 58 0 0.00 0.43

30 397.35 362.1 27.0 21,529 6,981 870 0 57 0 0.00 1.76

31 423.68 558.7 196.6 106,510 6,607 740 0 57 0 0.00 3.45

TOTALS 311.8 211,507 50,777 1,619 0 1,687 147 0.84 13.64

ACRE-FEET 311,80

0

419,524 100,716 3,211 0 3,346 292

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 100,716 Outlet 0

Spill 3,211 Pumping Plant 3,346

Total = 107,274

Precipitation

This month = 13.64

October 01, 2022 To date = 15.85

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Folsom Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/29/2023
**EXHIBIT
          32**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
  **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
          connection with the Annual Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form
          10-QSB
          for the period from ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
          and
          Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
          in the
          capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
          to 18
          U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1.
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/
                    CLAUDIA ZAMAN
                  Claudia
                    Zaman
                  CEO,
                    CFO
                  Dated:
                    November 14, 2007
  This
          certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
          by the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
          of
  Section
          18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
e 1111.1"" '''" It ••• '.tl' If

[COLOG'

Focus

Site Hazard Assessment

The Department of Ecology is in the process of ranking IIIof Washingtoa-. S80 known

or suspected hazardous waste sites as required by the Model Toxies COotroi Ad.

However, before these sites can be accunlely ranked lbey must undergo aD

environmental data collection process. This process. bawD IS I site hazard asst:ssmCUI,

helps Ecology determine the type and extent of commination It I site.

Assessing the Potential Hazard . ..'~ : , .... ,.~ ....... i·-:; ,; -.,. -.J. ~.~

A site hazard assessment is an early study to provide preliminary data repnJiDg the . relative potential hazard of a site. The main purpose ofI lite hazard aSSCISdllt1lt ia to

provide sufficient sampling data and other informatioa to: .... . ,...

• Confirm or rule out contaminatx. :: ~I.'<~~~ (~- j:=J:.. .~' ..' t··

• Identify the hazardous substancc(s)

• Identify en~ro~~'ntalcb~'ra'd~cS~iated"wUii~~ '4Kii~~~:~.~ ,...... $:.~ -:~j ~H~i'~:.:~

• Evaluate the potential for the thn:2t to human health and the environmeat

It is important to note that a hazard MSC'SSment is not intended to bea detailed site study

or assessment of the health risk posed by a site. ' .

Is a Site Hazard Assessment Always Necessarl' .' . ":. : .:s-,- .'

Yes. A hazard assessment is necessalJ even if environmental data is already available for

the site. This helps ensure that all data elements are accounted forpriorto saxing aDd

ranking a site. ECology encourages siIe owners to submit any relevant enviroomental

studies of their site. This will help Ecology in scoring and ranking the site as accurately

as possible. .

What Must Be Included To Accurately Assess a Site?

7.Any odJeI' bctors which

mal besignificant ia

estImating the exposure to

sensitive environments.

to ground water and

distance to nearby wells.

bodies ofsudxe water aDd

. drinking waIa' supplies.

6. An evaluation ofhuman

population, food aops, . recreatioe sensitive

environments. irrigated

areas and aquatic resources.

4. Coosideration ofsurface

water run-on and nm-off

and the possibility of cootamioants seeping througb

the surface and contaminating pound water.

S. OAracterization of

sub-surface and ground

water, including the depcb

3. A description of the

facilities containing the

substaDces and their

condition.

2. Identification ofthe

hazardous substances and

their location, including

what was or may be

released and, if applicable,

what products of decomposition, recombination or

chemical reaction are

currently present at the site.

Although a site hazard assessment is DOt intended to be a detailed site characterizatioa, it

includes sampling results from various locations on aDd around the site, site observations.

maps and other information needed to score and rank the site. Specifically, a site hazard

assessment should include:

1. Evidence confirming a

release or threatened

release of a hazardous

substance.

October 1990

. \. . .. .-
### §§268 to 272. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§454–458, 42 Stat. 955, 956, related to duties and compensation of boarding and discharging inspectors, custody of cargo not unladen promptly, unlading at risk of consignee and time for unlading bulk cargo.

Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to section 268, see section 1455 of this title; section 269, see section 1456 of this title; section 270, see section 1457 of this title; section 271, none; section 272, see section 1458 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.203 Exportation without payment of tax.

A brewer may remove beer without payment of tax (a) for exportation, (b) for use as supplies on vessels and aircraft, or (c) for transfer to and deposit in foreign-trade zones for exportation or for storage pending exportation, in accordance with part 28 of this chapter. Beer may be removed from a brewery in bottles, kegs, or in bulk containers.

(Sec. 309, Tariff Act of 1930, 46 Stat. 690, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309); sec. 3, Act of June 18, 1934, 48 Stat. 999, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c); sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1334, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5053))

[T.D. ATF-224, 51 FR 7673, Mar. 5, 1986, T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3830, Jan. 27, 2004]