alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brent M. Cook, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser Technologies, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    BRENT M. COOK                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Brent M. Cook                                        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Martin F. Petersen, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Raser Technologies, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    MARTIN F.
PETERSEN                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Martin F. Petersen                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of each of the above-written statements required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Raser Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Raser Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,303]


Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Headquarters Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Volt Services, Adecco, Manpower, Express Personnel, 
and Tek Systems; Federal Way, Washington; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 2, 2010, applicable to workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, 
Corporate Headquarters, including on-site leased workers from Volt 
Services, Adecco, and Manpower, Federal Way, Washington. The workers 
supply corporate and administrative services for the firm. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 34177). 
The notice was amended on November 18, 2010 to include on-site leased 
workers from Express Personnel. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on December 7, 2010 (75 FR 76040).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
workers leased from Tek Systems were employed on-site at the Federal 
Way, Washington location of Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate 
Headquarters. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the control of Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate 
Headquarters to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Tek Systems working on-
site at the Federal Way, Washington location of Weyerhaeuser Company, 
Corporate Headquarters.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,303 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Weyerhaeuser Company, Corporate Headquarters, 
including on-site leased workers from Volt Services, Adecco, 
Manpower, Express Personnel, and Tek Systems, Federal Way, 
Washington, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after January 7, 2009, through June 2, 2012, and 
all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of March 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-8242 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Teda Travel Incorporated (the "Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Godfrey Chin Tong
Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Teda Travel Incorporated and will
be retained by Teda Travel Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Godfrey Chin Tong Hui
--------------------------
Godfrey Chin Tong Hui
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,449

 1,421

 1,405

 1,401

 1,318

 1,254

 1,242

 1,185

 1,168

 1,167

 1,140

 1,113

 1,096

 1,094

 1,109

 1,177

 1,209

 1,228

 1,323

 1,193

 1,128

 1,098

 1,051

 1,007

 1,005

 995

 1,017

 999

 973

 915

 920

 1,078

 1,057

 1,041

 1,042

 998

 966

 973

 968

 980

 969

 973

 969

 955

 945

 925

 917

 907

 909

 884

 898

 809

 812

 798

 794

 812

 835

 813

 794

 777

 747

 744

 1,226

 1,210

 1,224

 1,214

 1,152

 1,118

 1,105

 1,091

 1,081

 1,066

 1,052

 1,043

 1,031

 1,021

 1,018

 1,049

 1,045

 1,058

 1,076

 1,033

 955

 930

 924

 914

 910

 915

 900

 892

 867

 848

 839

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
§ 24.301 Bulk still wine and bulk still hard cider record. A proprietor who produces or receives still wine or bulk still hard cider in bond, (including wine intended for use as distilling material or vinegar stock to which water has not yet been added) shall maintain records of transactions for bulk still wine or bulk still hard cider. Records will be maintained for each tax class of still wine or for hard cider including the date the transaction occurred. The bulk still wine and bulk still hard cider or for hard cider record will contain the following: ( a ) The volume produced by fermentation in wine gallons determined by actual measurement;
( b ) The volume received, shipped taxpaid, removed (e.g., taxpaid, in bond, export, family use, samples) and used in sparkling wine or sparkling hard cider production; if a tax credit under 26 U.S.C. 5041(c) may be claimed, the record will be maintained in sufficient detail to insure that such a tax credit is properly claimed;
( c ) The specific type of production method used, e.g., natural fermentation, amelioration, sweetening, addition of spirits, blending;
( d ) The volume of wine used and produced by amelioration, addition of spirits or sweetening, as determined by measurements of the wine before and after production.
( e ) The volume of wine used for and produced by blending, if wines of different tax classes are blended together;
( f ) The volume of wine used to produce formula wine, vinegar stock and distilling material;
( g ) The volume of wine removed to fermenters for refermentation or removed directly to the production facilities of a distilled spirits plant or vinegar plant;
( h ) Where a process authorized under § 24.248 is employed, records will be maintained to allow for verification of any limitation specified for the process employed and to ensure that the use of the process is consistent with good commercial practice;
( i ) Where a treating material is dissolved or dispersed in water as authorized in this part, the volume of water added to the wine;
( j ) An explanation of any unusual transaction. (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367)); and
( k ) If the proprietor is an importer of wine to which the provisions of § 27.140 of this chapter apply, any certification or other records required at the time of release from customs custody under that section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0115) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-307, 55 FR 52738, Dec. 21, 1990; T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31082, July 9, 1991; T.D. TTB-31, 70 FR 49483, Aug. 24, 2005; T.D. TTB-147, 82 FR 7665, Jan. 23, 2017]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Background Material Provided to the HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD (HSRB)

April 8-9, 2014 Public Meeting

1. AEATF Solid Pour Scenario Protocol

a. EPA Science and Ethics Review

b. AEATF Volume 1: Transmittal Letter, Checklist, Study Design Document

c. AEATF Volume 2: Protocol, IRB Approval Letter, Supporting Documents

d. AEATF Volume 3: IRB Review Records

e. AEATF Volume 4: CVs and Ethics Training Records, AEAFT-II SOPs

f. AEATF Supplemental Submission of tox study summaries for CYA

g. Schulman Associates IRB Standard Operating Procedures

h. Schulman Associates IRB Board Members

i. Charge Questions
#### H. G. Vogel Company v. Harris Wolff.

Motion granted; question certified. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only 

Summary of Personal and Area Air Monitoring Results for Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate 

CONFIDENTIAL 

BUSINESS INFORMATION 

40-CFR2.203(b)
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                              INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
------------------                              -----------------------------
<S>                                             <C>
Tekex Limited                                   U.S. Virgin Islands
Tekelec Limited                                 United Kingdom
IEX Corporation                                 Nevada
Tekelec France                                  France
Tekelec Canada Inc.                             Canada
Tekelec Germany GmbH                            Germany
Tekelec Italy srl                               Italy
Tekelec do Brasil Ltda.                         Brazil
Tekelec Singapore Pte. Ltd.                     Singapore
</TABLE>

----------
* The subsidiaries of the Registrant do not do business under any name other
than as listed above
### **CHAPTER 22—NATIONAL COUNCIL ON THE ARTS**
### Part F—Demonstration Projects
#### In the Matter of the Application of United Shellac Corporation, Appellant, for an Order Staying Arbitration Proceedings by Montauk Paint & Wall Paper Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.26
 Capella Healthcare, Inc.  Deferred Compensation Plan
 Effective March 1, 2008
 I. NAME AND PURPOSE
   II. DEFINITIONS
      1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



III. ELIGIBILITY AND BENEFIT ACCRUALS
 Eligibility
 Participant Deferral Elections
  3




---



##### 



e.g.
     Company Contributions
 Earnings e.g.
 4




---



##### 



Benefit Accruals
 Vesting
 Years of  Service
    
    Percent VestedLess than 1
    
    
    0
    %1
    
    
    20
    %2
    
    
    40
    %3
    
    
    60
    %4
    
    
    80
    %5 or more
    
    
    100
    %
 5




---



##### 



IV. BENEFIT ELECTIONS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
 Commencement of Distribution
 Form of Distribution
 Payments to Beneficiaries
 Right of Offset
 Financial Hardship
  6




---



##### 



V. ADMINISTRATION
 Administration Committee
 Funding
   Claims Procedure
  7




---



##### 



Designation of Beneficiaries per stirpes
 8




---



##### 



VI. MISCELLANEOUS
 Non-assignment of Interest
 Successors
 Amendment and Termination
 Taxes
 Controlling Law
 Plan Transfers
 9




---



##### 



Distribution Delays
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 CAPELLA HEALTHCARE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Cardyn SchneiderIts:
    
    VP, Human Resources
 10
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add the work hours. parts cost, and number of US. registered products to the table below. When you are 

.finis/zed. click on the "Update Fields., button to auromatically.fi/1 in the totals. 

Update Fields ~~ 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, _Qropeller, a~liance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered condition costs here and close-up) our) Products 

Option I: External 3.5 '""l{)~_7 '207,)0 572 ~~ 00 DFEC inspection L-'! 

Option 2: Internal 

9.9 ~. .50 ::~ 34! 572 1.338 .00 HFEC inspection 

., o.oe s 0,00 1_ OJ)O 

s 0.00 s O.OfJ 1_ 0 00 

s 0.00 'h 0 {){; $ 0.00 

s u.no 2 O(Hl 5 0.00 

<.; 0.00 s f1.0il :s 0.00 

s P Ou s 0.00 s J.OO 

1_ 0.00 s 0.00 $ n.oo ') ').0(} s o no s 0.00 

s n.oo s \1.00 $ 0.00 

' '~' 0.!!0 S __QJ.I_(l s 0.00 

s o on c.: noo s O.UO 

\ 0 00 .,., 0.00 i 0.00 

') 0.00 s n.oc 'b 0.00 

s o.no 2 O.PO 1_ {). 00 

·..; C.OO s u no s ~_j. f1f_) 

') OJJfJ ', i; nn $ 0 ~iO 

s 0.00 ~ 0 0() $ 0.00 

"' "-' 0 00 \ O.OP 1_ O.OU 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $651,508 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $Wananty 

On-Condition Costs:-... 

Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., Inspection, testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection '-) 0. 1

)0 i O.OJ 

$ uno " 0 .dO 

') JOO ~ {' (i() 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): Only one of the 

estimated costs listed above would be used since maintenance has the option of which one to perform. The 

total cost, therefore, is more than the fleet would see. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer ~ 

YES D NO IZl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? , 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

8
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

HALIS, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-22588 on Form S-8 dated June 16, 1988, No. 33-22591 on Form
S-8 dated June 16, 1988, No. 33-38257 on Form S-8 dated December 19, 1990, No.
33-38258 on Form S-8 dated December 19, 1990, No. 33-53702 on Form S-8 dated
October 20, 1992, and No. 33-53704 on Form S-8 dated October 20, 1992, of our
report dated March 7, 1997, relating to the financial statements of HALIS, Inc.
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

/s/ HABIF, AROGETI & WYNNE, P.C.


Atlanta, Georgia
April 10, 1998
From: Greenberg, Alan (ENRD)  

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 3:19 PM

To: 'McWilliams, Douglas A.' <douglas.mcwilliams@squirepb.com>

Cc: Kacenjar, Allen A. <allen.kacenjar@squirepb.com>

Subject: RE: taconite petitions for review; confidential settlement communication [I‐AMS.FID1382176]

Doug:

EPA does not intend to have a statistician on the call.  EPA Region 5 staff anticipate being able to explain the issue without a

statistician because the issue is one of algebra.  The equation for normally distributed and not statistically independent  data

calculates a UPL for large data sets that is strongly affected by the number of samples.  In other words, in the case of large data

sets, the higher the number of samples, the higher the UPL, because of the (n‐1) term under the square root.   As an illustration

of EPA’s concern, EPA generated a normally distributed random sample of 5719 values to calculate 5000 values of 720 hour

averages with the following results:

The 720 hour averages were normally distributed but not statistically independent.  

x̄= 1.05208, n=5000, s=0.00564, ρ = 0.9988

Using the same values for x,̄s, m, and ρ and changing t (to correspond with value of n), changes in “n” result in the following UPL

values:

UPL (n=10) =                      1.062487

UPL (n=100) =                    1.062070

UPL (n=5000) =                 1.078220

UPL (n = 10000) =             1.087861

UPL (n = 15000) =             1.095408

The values of the 5000 720‐hour averages ranged from 1.039 lbs NOx/MMBTUs to 1.065 lbs NOx/MMBTUs.  So, with n=5000,

the 95% UPL is much higher than the highest value in the range.   

In response to several other questions in your email, the US Steel data was not normally distributed, but enabled EPA to identify

the problem associated with large data sets.   The alternative to the Rank von Neumann test was used to determine that the U.S.

Steel data was not statistically independent.   EPA’s ProUCL statistical software identifies the non‐parametric equation for

determining the UPL of data that does not follow a specific distribution.  

Please let me know if you still desire EPA to provide results associated with the US Steel data set, and whether you would  like to

discuss the issue with EPA early next week.  

Alan
EXHIBIT 23.3
 Consent of the National Ski Areas Association
  Dated: May 31, 2011
    The National Ski Areas AssociationBy:
    /s/ Michael BerryName:
    Michael BerryTitle:
    President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 360.14

 360.07

 359.98

 359.95

 359.89

 359.85

 359.80

 359.70

 359.70

 359.70

 359.70

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.68

 359.70

 359.70

 547

 542

 536

 534

 529

 527

 523

 516

 516

 516

 516

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 515

 516

 516

STORAGE

-6

-5

-6

-2

-5

-2

-4

-7

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 881

 766

 633

 559

 477

 404

 331

 212

 203

 203

 202

 202

 201

 201

 200

 201

 202

 202

 204

 209

 209

 204

 204

 201

 200

 201

 205

 201

 201

 200

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2016 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2016

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -37 0 8,719 0

ACRE-FEET -37 0 17,294 0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 0

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 0

 17,294

 553

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 829

 723

 595

 525

 452

 377

 310

 205

 204

 204

 204

 204

 205

 204

 204

 206

 208

 208

 208

 208

 208

 205

 203

 204

 204

 202

 197

 200

 205

 205

 8,516

 16,891

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 17,294

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

RIVER CANALS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 374

 370

 360

 358

 349

 342

 331

 330

 333

 328

 328

 331

 329

 326

 340

 376

 395

 395

 390

 403

 391

 390

 380

 374

 369

 369

 366

 366

 331

 326

 319

 315

 312

 309

 309

 310

 312

 308

 310

 312

 312

 311

 310

 313

 320

 325

 331

 331

 333

 327

 326

 335

 331

 335

 333

 338

 350

 349

 344

 336

 330

 325

 321

 318

 319

 316

 319

 317

 317

 318

 325

 341

 358

 361

 362

 371

 362

 363

 354

 351

 350

 348

 349

 351

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH