Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices 19473 

company that has plants all over the 

world’’ and identified customers with 

worker groups eligible to apply for TAA 

(‘‘Pulaski Furniture certified 1/17/07, 

Woodmaster certified 5/19/06, 

Ridgeway Furniture certified 11/6/07, 

Hooker Furniture certified 10/5/06, 

American Pride certified 8/25/09 and 

Stanley Furniture 5/5/10’’). The workers 

also supplied an article, dated February 

24, 2010, that stated ‘‘Guardian is a 

diversified global manufacturing 

company * * * Guardian * * * 

operates facilities throughout North 

America, Europe, South America, Asia, 

Africa, and the Middle East.’’ 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department obtained 

from the subject firm additional 

information related to those customers 

identified in the request for 

reconsideration that both employed 

workers groups eligible to apply for 

TAA and conducted business with the 

subject firm during the relevant period. 

Information obtained during the 

reconsideration investigation confirmed 

that, during the relevant period, the 

subject firm did not shift to/acquire 

from a foreign country import articles 

like or directly competitive with 

mirrored and/or laminated glass 

products manufactured by the subject 

workers. Further, the subject firm 

confirmed that, on a firm-wide basis, 

they do not import articles like or 

directly competitive with mirrored/ 

laminated glass products nor did the 

subject firm import articles directly 

incorporating component parts 

produced outside the United States that 

are like or directly competitive with 

imports of articles incorporating one or 

more component parts produced by the 

subject firm. 

While the subject firm may have 

produced and supplied a component 

part used by a firm that both employed 

a worker group that is currently eligible 

to apply for TAA and directly 

incorporated the glass products in the 

production of that article that was the 

basis for the TAA certification, 

information obtained during the 

reconsideration investigation revealed 

that the customer accounted for an 

insignificant percentage of the subject 

firm sales. Therefore, the Department 

confirms that the subject workers are 

not adversely affected secondary 

workers. 

Conclusion 

After reconsideration, I affirm the 

original notice of negative 

determination of eligibility to apply for 

worker adjustment assistance for 

workers and former workers of 

Consolidated Glass and Mirror 

Corporation, a Subsidiary of Guardian 

Industries Corporation, Galax, Virginia. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on this 29th 

day of March, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8309 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,458] 

Chrysler Financial Services Americas, 

LLC, a Subsidiary of FinCo 

Intermediate Holding Co., LLC, Troy 

Customer Contact Center; Troy, MI; 

Notice of Negative Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On September 21, 2010, the 

Department of Labor issued an 

Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration for the 

workers and former workers of Chrysler 

Financial Services Americas, LLC, a 

subsidiary of FinCo Intermediate 

Holding Co., LLC, Troy Customer 

Contact Center, Troy, Michigan (subject 

firm). The Department’s Notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 29, 2010 (75 FR 60138). 

The subject worker group is engaged 

in employment related to the supply of 

automotive-related financial services to 

dealers and consumers, including retail 

and wholesale financing, remarketing, 

and customer service and collections. 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) if it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

findings that there have not been 

increased imports of services like or 

directly competitive with the financial 

services supplied by the subject firm, 

and there has not been a shift in the 

supply of services by the firm to a 

foreign country. In addition, the subject 

firm is not a supplier or downstream 

producer to a firm that employed a 

worker group eligible to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA). For 

worker groups that supply a service 

instead of producing a component part, 

the term ‘‘supplier’’ means a firm that 

supplies directly to another firm 

services used in the production of 

articles or in the supply of services, as 

the case may be, that were the basis for 

the certification of eligibility. 

The request for reconsideration states 

that ‘‘the workers at Chrysler Financial 

Services, Troy, Michigan were engaged 

in activities that initiated the need to 

produce automotive vehicles and 

automotive vehicle parts * * * multiple 

production facilities within the Chrysler 

Group has lost production due to 

imports which resulted in the decrease 

in sales.’’ 

Information collected during the 

initial investigation confirmed that 

another domestic entity would be the 

new financial arm for Chrysler, LLC, 

and that, as a result, certain functions 

performed by the subject workers have 

been realigned domestically. 

During the reconsideration 

investigation, the Department received 

information that confirmed that the 

subject firm did not shift to nor acquire 

from a foreign country the supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with the services supplied by the 

subject workers. 

Further, the Department determined 

that the services supplied by the subject 

workers were not used in the 

production of an article. Rather, the 

financial services supplied by the 

subject worker group are postproduction. 

Conclusion 

After reconsideration, I affirm the 

original notice of negative 

determination of eligibility to apply for 

worker adjustment assistance for 

workers and former workers of Chrysler 

Financial Services Americas, LLC, a 

subsidiary of FinCo Intermediate 

Holding Co., LLC, Troy Customer 

Contact Center, Troy, Michigan. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on this 29th 

day of March, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–8308 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES