alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 24.53 Amending the dealer registration.

Every proprietor registered as a dealer under § 24.52 must maintain a current and accurate application file under subpart D of this part. Whenever there is a change to any of the information provided in the proprietor's approved application, the proprietor must amend the application within the time period specified in subpart D of this part. An amendment of the proprietor's wine premises approved application will also amend the proprietor's dealer registration under § 24.52. The proprietor's dealer registration will also terminate when wine operations authorized under this part terminate.

(26 U.S.C. 5124)

[T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37404, July 28, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 322

 320

 324

 313

 312

 305

 309

 305

 303

 299

 294

 293

 295

 298

 301

 299

 295

 296

 305

 305

 314

 305

 293

 292

 298

 296

 295

 293

 291

 296

 307

 307

 308

 305

 296

 297

 297

 291

 295

 286

 281

 280

 285

 281

 286

 286

 284

 281

 277

 283

 281

 283

 282

 277

 285

 282

 282

 274

 280

 281

 311

 312

 312

 309

 305

 300

 303

 300

 298

 294

 288

 286

 289

 290

 292

 291

 288

 287

 287

 289

 289

 289

 286

 285

 291

 288

 287

 285

 286

 286

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
#### Ruth Trentecosta et al., Appellants, v. Esther Greenberger, Respondent.

Appeal from an order in a negligence action denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate and set aside the dismissal of the action, and to restore the case to the calendar for trial. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements unless, within ten days from entry of the order hereon, plaintiffs pay to defendant the sum of $300 costs, in which event the order is reversed on the facts, without costs, the motion granted, judgment vacated, and the case restored to the trial calendar, without costs. The sum of $300 represents under the circumstances, reasonable indemnification to defendant for the expense incurred by reason of the dilatory tactics of the attorney representing plaintiffs. Only the interests of the plaintiff wife who, so far as appears, was blameless, impel us to grant the motion upon the payment of the costs. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 514.00

 514.20

 514.65

 515.06

 515.67

 516.01

 516.62

 517.30

 517.61

 517.90

 518.47

 518.49

 518.74

 519.03

 519.62

 519.97

 520.37

 520.70

 521.20

 521.98

 522.58

 523.69

 524.17

 525.45

 526.87

 527.85

 528.75

 529.80

 531.09

 1,671,182

 1,673,559

 1,678,913

 1,683,795

 1,691,068

 1,695,127

 1,702,417

 1,710,556

 1,714,271

 1,717,748

 1,724,591

 1,724,831

 1,727,836

 1,731,323

 1,738,425

 1,742,643

 1,747,468

 1,751,452

 1,757,494

 1,766,934

 1,774,207

 1,787,690

 1,793,532

 1,809,141

 1,826,513

 1,838,535

 1,849,600

 1,862,538

 1,878,476

 5,951

 2,256

 2,504

 3,361

 3,105

 2,466

 3,277

 5,863

 734

 2,567

 1,699

 0

 0

 240

 2,842

 821

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,268

 5,506

 2,030

 2,142

 2,418

 3,691

 4,086

 4,225

 10,747

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 29, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2004 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 214,063 0 9,938 51,054

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 6,769

 2,377

 5,354

 4,882

 7,273

 4,059

 7,290

 8,139

 3,715

 3,477

 6,843

 240

 3,005

 3,487

 7,102

 4,218

 4,825

 3,984

 6,042

 9,440

 7,273

 13,483

 5,842

 15,609

 17,372

 12,022

 11,065

 12,938

 15,938

 413

 413

 413

 413

 415

 326

 354

 360

 367

 374

 340

 355

 333

 336

 320

 317

 344

 311

 253

 0

 378

 376

 387

 394

 339

 333

 324

 324

 326

5,338

2,152

1,943

2,878

2,483

2,123

2,596

5,378

438

2,055

1,182

-337

-517

-182

2,368

549

-41

-269

-409

-290

894

3,696

392

-19

1,141

1,922

2,535

2,671

8,384

ELEV STORAGE

 73,799

 860,995

 863,147

 865,090

 867,968

 870,451

 872,574

 875,170

 880,548

 880,986

 883,041

 884,223

 883,886

 883,369

 883,187

 885,555

 886,104

 886,063

 885,794

 885,385

 885,095

 885,989

 889,685

 890,077

 890,058

 891,199

 893,121

 895,656

 898,327

 906,711

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 855,657

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

-9,616
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.30

 1,198.30

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.30

 1,198.30

 1,198.30

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.27

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 48.44

 48.44

 48.42

 48.42

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.42

 48.42

 48.42

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.37

 48.39

 48.39

 48.37

 48.37

 48.37

 48.37

 48.35

 48.35

 48.35

 48.35

 48.35

 48.35

 48.33

 48.35

 48.33

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

+0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.02

-0.02

CHANGE

55

67

48

57

44

52

55

56

55

71

58

57

45

53

54

28

54

48

37

35

43

45

33

39

35

39

39

43

29

51

32

INFLOW

 59

 59

 53

 53

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 53

 53

 53

 47

 47

 47

 36

 42

 42

 36

 36

 36

 36

 31

 31

 31

 31

 31

 31

 27

 31

 27

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 4

 7

 3

 3

 5

 4

 7

 8

 7

 8

 4

 3

 6

 5

 6

 9

 2

 5

 9

 7

 6

 8

 10

 7

 3

 7

 7

 11

 10

 10

 13

C.F.S.

 .07

 .12

 .05

 .06

 .09

 .07

 .12

 .14

 .12

 .14

 .07

 .05

 .11

 .09

 .10

 .16

 .03

 .08

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .14

 .18

 .12

 .06

 .13

 .13

 .19

 .17

 .18

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/09/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.14 1,457 31 1,294 204 3.59 .08

ACRE-FEET -140 2,890 61 2,567 405

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 2,567

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 2,628

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .08

JULY 1, 2014 12.90

 48.46
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with  the amended Quarterly Report of Your Domain.com
(the "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB/A  for  the period ended March  31, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I,  Anthony N. DeMint,  President  and Chief Accounting Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



			      /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              Anthony N. DeMint
                              President and Chief Accounting Officer
                              August 29, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 323

 378

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 395

 0

 418

 432

 457

 504

 545

 565

 600

 0

 0

 0

 0

 764

 0

 0

 748

 0

 0

 0

 831

 849

 830

 284

 287

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 304

 0

 317

 330

 346

 359

 368

 385

 388

 0

 0

 0

 0

 484

 0

 0

 532

 0

 0

 0

 589

 593

 598

 306

 321

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 351

 0

 367

 376

 388

 412

 447

 484

 510

 0

 0

 0

 0

 642

 0

 0

 646

 0

 0

 0

 695

 714

 724

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 20, 2011
 LEGACY BANCORP, INC.
  Delaware
    
    0-51525
    
    20-3135053(State or Other Jurisdiction)
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (I.R.S. Employerof Incorporation)
    
    
    
    Identification No.)
 99 North Street, Pittsfield, Massachusetts
    
    01201(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
  Proposal 1  To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of December 21, 2010, by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and Legacy Bancorp,
Inc., and thereby to approve the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. with and into Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc.
  For
    
    
    4,854,948Against
    
    
    34,708Abstain
    
    
    2,825
 Proposal 2  To approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the
merger.
  For
    
    
    4,247,719Against
    
    
    146,836Abstain
    
    
    497,926
 Item 8.01 Other Events
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (a)
    
    Financial Statements of Business Acquired. Not Applicable.(b)
    
    Pro Forma Financial Information. Not Applicable.(c)
    
    Shell Company Transactions. Not Applicable.(d)
    
    Exhibits.
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Joint Press Release issued in conjunction with the Special
Meetings of Stockholders of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. and
Legacy Bancorp, Inc.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Legacy Bancorp, Inc.DATE: June 20, 2011
    By:
    /s/ J. Williar DunlaevyJ. Williar DunlaevyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER X—MISCELLANEOUS
(No. 74-CC-163

#### Kenneth Moy, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Fair Employment Practices Commission, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 3, 1973.*

Kenneth Moy, Claimant, pro se.

*160William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
MICHAEL JOSEPH NILIO

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3405

Opinion filed August 11, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Michael Joseph Nilio, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The p etition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ.

, CONCUR.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 164

 156

 156

 159

 153

 150

 147

 147

 156

 153

 150

 148

 146

 145

 145

 152

 149

 149

 148

 148

 151

 153

 156

 159

 160

 159

 160

 165

 171

 175

 174

 144

 144

 143

 142

 142

 142

 140

 139

 137

 139

 139

 139

 140

 140

 140

 139

 140

 140

 138

 138

 137

 138

 142

 147

 147

 149

 151

 152

 152

 154

 157

 150

 148

 147

 147

 145

 145

 143

 142

 143

 143

 144

 144

 143

 142

 142

 144

 144

 143

 142

 142

 143

 145

 148

 151

 152

 153

 155

 156

 158

 161

 164

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,223

 2,200

 2,176

 2,152

 2,129

 2,108

 2,089

 2,073

 2,064

 2,057

 2,051

 2,043

 2,035

 2,026

 2,018

 2,014

 2,011

 2,007

 2,004

 2,001

 2,001

 2,004

 2,009

 2,017

 2,025

 2,034

 2,046

 2,060

 2,076

 2,093

 2,113

 159

 157

 155

 154

 152

 151

 149

 148

 147

 147

 147

 146

 145

 145

 144

 144

 144

 143

 143

 143

 143

 143

 144

 144

 145

 145

 146

 147

 148

 150

 151

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 217

 232

 391

 641

 926

 797

 1,113

 804

 634

 676

 691

 546

 890

 716

 800

 651

 931

 880

 922

 911

 866

 594

 469

 398

 408

 305

 267

 229

 291

 309

 464

 153

 149

 152

 161

 181

 206

 226

 228

 219

 213

 200

 165

 176

 173

 175

 178

 186

 208

 212

 209

 203

 185

 179

 179

 174

 173

 170

 166

 164

 164

 167

 169

 165

 192

 265

 339

 344

 441

 351

 300

 316

 300

 263

 271

 260

 254

 249

 278

 308

 331

 338

 315

 251

 241

 223

 222

 207

 194

 186

 188

 182

 207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,211

 3,175

 3,159

 3,204

 3,277

 3,360

 3,506

 3,638

 3,670

 3,734

 3,751

 3,804

 3,891

 3,976

 4,061

 4,145

 4,231

 4,274

 4,266

 4,260

 4,134

 4,034

 3,975

 3,882

 3,804

 3,748

 3,671

 3,597

 3,531

 3,464

 3,393

 229

 227

 226

 229

 234

 240

 250

 260

 262

 267

 268

 272

 278

 284

 290

 296

 302

 305

 305

 304

 295

 288

 284

 277

 272

 268

 262

 257

 252

 247

 242

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 535 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 535

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
 designate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as hazardous substances 
   under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                         Liability Act of 1980.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2019

 Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Upton, and Mr. Kildee) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
   Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and 
   Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
 designate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as hazardous substances 
   under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                         Liability Act of 1980.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PFAS Action Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION AS HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall designate 
all per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances as hazardous substances under 
section 102(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9602(a)).
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title to Certain Lands and Premises on the Easterly Side of Pennsylvania Avenue, etc.

Motion granted, without costs, and question as submitted approved. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 572

 535

 523

 514

 518

 530

 536

 552

 565

 572

 563

 553

 569

 569

 578

 577

 581

 589

 591

 583

 572

 586

 601

 609

 610

 606

 633

 631

 648

 654

 649

 428

 425

 425

 415

 412

 421

 429

 440

 451

 457

 457

 456

 456

 441

 454

 458

 465

 461

 454

 470

 479

 490

 503

 501

 506

 521

 525

 524

 516

 520

 523

 507

 491

 482

 475

 472

 477

 485

 494

 504

 506

 508

 517

 521

 518

 523

 523

 528

 531

 532

 532

 532

 537

 549

 551

 550

 564

 578

 591

 596

 599

 592

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### subpart 2—other proceedings regarding certain standards-related activities
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,950

 1,918

 1,875

 1,863

 1,797

 1,745

 1,697

 1,652

 1,620

 1,557

 1,519

 1,444

 1,381

 1,323

 1,299

 1,237

 1,189

 1,157

 1,119

 1,078

 1,037

 1,003

 974

 934

 917

 883

 864

 844

 1,506

 1,519

 1,538

 1,537

 1,521

 1,488

 1,469

 1,434

 1,347

 1,287

 1,282

 1,253

 1,233

 1,227

 1,183

 1,181

 1,138

 1,092

 1,006

 984

 958

 902

 849

 866

 818

 705

 794

 710

 1,694

 1,694

 1,691

 1,653

 1,617

 1,589

 1,578

 1,566

 1,514

 1,446

 1,398

 1,359

 1,317

 1,284

 1,248

 1,214

 1,168

 1,124

 1,075

 1,038

 1,005

 968

 933

 908

 882

 841

 835

 805

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
#### § 19.686 Change in name of proprietor.

When there is a change in the name of the individual, firm, corporation, or other entity holding the permit, the proprietor must file an application to amend the permit on form TTB F 5110.74, Application and Permit for an Alcohol Fuel Producer Under 26 U.S.C. 5181, or file a letterhead application to amend the permit within 30 days of the change. The proprietor is not required to file a new bond or consent of surety in this case.

(26 U.S.C. 5172, 5271, 5181)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Brenton Allen Hope v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00592

- CR

Trial court case number: 12

- 14208

Trial court: 252nd District Court of Jefferson County

The clerk’s record filed in the above

- referenced appeal is incomplete. P u r su a nt to

T e x a s R ule o f App e ll a t e P r o c e du r e 3 4 .5 (c) , t h e trial court c l er k is di rec t e d to f ile a sp ec i a l

c l er k ’ s r ec o r d c ont a inin g :

Final J ud g m e nt Adjudi ca ting Guilt, d a t e d May 30, 2013

S e e T E X

. R

. A PP

. P . 34.5 ( c)( 1 )

.

The sp ec i a l c l er k ’ s rec or d sh a ll be f il e d in the F i r st C ou r t of App ea ls wi t hin 10 d a y s

o f the d a te of this noti ce

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 9, 2014
#### James E. Taylor, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert W. Taylor, Deceased, Respondent, v. Charles Yukoweic, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present.— Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Sneed, J., not voting. [See *ante,*p. 915.]
§ 81.14 Settlement negotiations. ( a ) If the parties to a case file a joint motion requesting a stay of the proceedings for settlement negotiations, or for approval of a settlement agreement, the ALJ may grant a stay of the proceedings upon a finding of good cause.
( b ) Evidence of conduct or statements made during settlement negotiations is not admissible in any proceeding under this part. However, evidence that is otherwise discoverable may not be excluded merely because it was presented during settlement negotiations.
( c ) The parties may not disclose the contents of settlement negotiations to the ALJ. If the parties enter into a settlement agreement and file a joint motion to dismiss the case, the ALJ grants the motion.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 554(c)(1), 1221e-3, 1234(f)(1), and 3474(a))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 43473, Aug. 16, 1993]
#### Etta Krulewitch, Appellant, v. Leon Mahler, Respondent.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan ^ind Van Voorhis, JJ.