alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 814

 837

 791

 788

 780

 776

 810

 811

 835

 829

 755

 795

 804

 819

 836

 831

 806

 817

 821

 828

 823

 859

 833

 823

 828

 843

 815

 901

 899

 908

 933

 394

 394

 406

 385

 382

 408

 380

 384

 403

 396

 400

 416

 421

 423

 406

 408

 388

 440

 436

 427

 425

 433

 443

 513

 451

 461

 527

 584

 614

 658

 666

 514

 553

 517

 534

 517

 519

 512

 534

 568

 543

 530

 555

 556

 567

 578

 566

 540

 548

 570

 561

 583

 595

 601

 631

 631

 627

 651

 747

 744

 775

 809

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 334

 358

 336

 346

 336

 337

 332

 346

 367

 352

 344

 359

 360

 366

 373

 366

 350

 355

 368

 363

 376

 384

 387

 406

 406

 403

 418

 478

 476

 495

 516

TOTAL 18,276

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 13.27 Second appeal of qualification or denial. ( a ) *Form of appeal.* The decision after appeal of qualification or denial may be appealed in writing to the appropriate TTB officer within 45 days after the date of that decision. If the appropriate TTB officer concludes that the qualified approval or denial was correct, a copy of the application, marked “appeal denied,” must be returned to the applicant, with an explanation of the decision and the specific laws or regulations relied upon in qualifying or denying the application. If the appropriate TTB officer concludes that the certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle application should be approved without qualification, the applicant may resubmit TTB Form 5100.31 and the certificate will be issued.
( b ) *Time limits for decision after second appeal.* Within 90 days of receipt of the second appeal, the appropriate TTB officer must notify the appellant whether the appeal has been granted or denied. If an applicant requests an informal conference as part of an appeal, as authorized in § 13.71, the 90-day period will begin 10 days after the date of the conference to allow for consideration of any written arguments, facts or evidence submitted after the conference. The appropriate TTB officer may extend this period of time once, by an additional 90 days, if he or she finds that unusual circumstances require additional time to consider the unique issues presented by an appeal. If the appropriate TTB officer extends the time period, he or she must notify the applicant by letter, briefly explaining the issues presented by the label. The decision made on the second appeal shall be the final decision of TTB.
( c ) *Judicial review.* An appeal to the appropriate TTB officer is required prior to application to the Federal courts for review of any denial or qualification of an application.
[T.D. ATF-406, 64 FR 2129, Jan. 13, 1999; T.D. ATF-406a, 64 FR 10949, Mar. 8, 1999, as amended by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Moreal  Chu and  Starcia  Chang,  hereby  jointly  certify as
follows:

         (a)      They are the  President  and  General  Manager  and the  Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Visual Frontier, Inc. (the "Company");

         (b)      To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")  complies
in  all  material  respects  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as  amended;  and

         (c)      To the best of their  knowledge,  based  upon a review  of the
Report, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company for
the period certified.


                                        By: /s/ Moreal Chu
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Moreal Chu
                                            Title: President and General Manager

                                        Date: November 19, 2003



                                        By: /s/ Starcia Chang
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Starcia Chang
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                        Date: November 19, 2003
§ 663.11 What is the role of the institution in the application process? An institution of higher education that participates in this program is responsible for— ( a ) Making fellowship application materials available to its faculty;
( b ) Accepting and screening applications in accordance with its own technical and academic criteria; and
( c ) Forwarding screened applications to the Secretary through a request for an institutional grant.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
----

----

|                                                                                 |   | Jurisdiction      of |   | Percent      of  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|------------------|
| Subsidiaries      Consolidated                                                       |   | Incorporation        |   | Stock      Owned |
| Amercoat      Japan Company, Limited                                                 |   | Japan                |   | 100              |
| American      Pipe & Construction International                                  |   | California           |   | 100              |
| Ameron      (Australia) Pty. Limited                                                 |   | Australia            |   | 100              |
| Ameron      B.V.                                                                     |   | the      Netherlands |   | 100              |
| Ameron      Composites Inc.                                                          |   | Delaware             |   | 100              |
| Ameron      (Hong Kong) Ltd.                                                         |   | Hong      Kong       |   | 100              |
| Ameron      Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.                                                       |   | Malaysia             |   | 100              |
| Ameron      (New Zealand) Limited                                                    |   | New      Zealand     |   | 100              |
| Ameron      (Pte) Ltd.                                                               |   | Singapore            |   | 100              |
| Ameron      (UK) Limited                                                             |   | United      Kingdom  |   | 100              |
| Centron      International, Inc.                                                     |   | Delaware             |   | 100              |
| Island      Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc.                                                 |   | Hawaii               |   | 100              |
| Pipeline      Industria e Comercio de Fibra de Vidro Ltda(“Polyplaster”) |   | Brazil               |   | 100              |
| Tubos      California Corporation                                                    |   | California           |   | 100              |
| Tubos      Y Activos, S. de R.L. de C.V.                                             |   | Mexico               |   | 100              |

| Subsidiaries      Not Consolidated and     |   |              |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|
| Fifty-Percent      or Less Owned Companies |   |              |   |   |
| TAMCO                                      |   | California        |   | 50     |
| Bondstrand,      Ltd.                      |   | Saudi      Arabia |   | 40     |
| Ameron      Saudi Arabia, Ltd.             |   | Saudi      Arabia |   | 30     |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 409.37

 410.94

 412.47

 413.97

 415.43

 416.95

 418.40

 419.87

 421.30

 422.29

 423.17

 424.04

 424.31

 424.55

 424.66

 424.60

 424.54

 424.47

 424.41

 424.82

 425.25

 425.76

 427.19

 428.64

 430.08

 431.81

 433.67

 435.51

 437.36

 439.16

 599,356

 612,545

 625,500

 638,300

 650,851

 664,015

 676,665

 689,580

 702,232

 711,041

 718,905

 726,712

 729,141

 731,303

 732,295

 731,754

 731,213

 730,582

 730,042

 733,738

 737,622

 742,239

 755,210

 768,447

 781,671

 797,659

 814,972

 832,223

 849,691

 866,804

 7,146

 6,766

 8,930

 8,767

 8,517

 6,439

 4,082

 4,962

 7,161

 7,074

 4,886

 4,887

 1,080

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,282

 4,275

 8,565

 8,533

 4,240

 4,230

 8,444

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 2, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2016 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 277,123 0 13,761 103,045

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 9,675

 13,189

 12,955

 12,800

 12,551

 13,164

 12,650

 12,915

 12,652

 8,809

 7,864

 7,807

 2,429

 2,162

 992

-541

-541

-631

-540

 3,696

 3,884

 4,617

 12,971

 13,237

 13,224

 15,988

 17,313

 17,251

 17,468

 17,113

 563

 381

 442

 459

 447

 451

 569

 636

 635

 642

 648

 669

 676

 682

 589

 368

 390

 365

 367

 338

 323

 332

 325

 318

 325

 310

 312

 319

 303

 577

6,144

6,020

8,130

8,020

7,757

5,882

3,419

4,381

6,471

6,378

4,212

4,176

498

-926

-415

-446

-458

-485

-3,608

-478

-385

-60

-545

3,861

3,847

8,193

8,048

3,771

3,864

7,779

ELEV STORAGE

 123,266

 162,322

 168,342

 176,472

 184,492

 192,249

 198,131

 201,550

 205,931

 212,402

 218,780

 222,992

 227,168

 227,666

 226,740

 226,325

 225,879

 225,421

 224,936

 221,328

 220,850

 220,465

 220,405

 219,860

 223,721

 227,568

 235,761

 243,809

 247,580

 251,444

 259,223

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 156,178

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-3,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-3,000
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth S. Eaton, Deceased.

Decree dated December 30, 1912, unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion in *Matter of Eaton (ante,*p. 7), decided herewith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          760,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,579
<OTHER-SE>                                    (271,391)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  271,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (261,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (261,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (261,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,604

 2,366

 1,949

 2,046

 2,526

 1,510

 1,627

 1,489

 1,441

 1,184

 598

 451

 676

 940

 878

 1,749

 2,093

 2,717

 3,450

 4,127

 4,804

 4,143

 3,699

 3,578

 3,101

 1,949

 2,917

 3,597

 3,454

 4,701

 3,989

 211

 189

 164

 210

 229

 184

 199

 209

 193

 188

 172

 166

 157

 147

 152

 155

 173

 213

 275

 351

 289

 264

 259

 283

 278

 280

 239

 245

 252

 271

 275

 440

 570

 544

 594

 729

 559

 424

 451

 379

 321

 241

 213

 200

 220

 230

 328

 415

 629

 929

 1,125

 1,158

 1,004

 964

 1,093

 943

 662

 675

 716

 854

 956

 916

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 7,295

 7,613

 7,834

 7,908

 8,085

 8,126

 7,824

 7,450

 6,984

 6,705

 6,457

 6,276

 6,078

 5,885

 5,675

 5,433

 5,304

 5,339

 5,539

 6,105

 6,839

 7,392

 7,977

 8,749

 9,451

 9,900

 10,375

 10,871

 11,495

 12,123

 12,624

 521

 544

 560

 565

 578

 580

 559

 532

 499

 479

 461

 448

 434

 420

 405

 388

 379

 381

 396

 436

 489

 528

 570

 625

 675

 707

 741

 777

 821

 866

 902

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Senner & Kaplan Company, Appellant, v. Louis K. Fisher and Leon M. Swawite, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 413.84

 413.40

 412.98

 412.71

 412.37

 412.08

 411.76

 411.43

 411.08

 410.83

 410.64

 410.36

 410.12

 409.75

 409.47

 409.12

 408.86

 408.64

 408.34

 408.02

 407.71

 407.39

 407.09

 406.88

 406.66

 406.34

 406.11

 405.80

 405.58

 405.39

 405.32

 479.0

 475.6

 472.3

 470.3

 467.7

 465.5

 463.0

 460.5

 457.9

 456.0

 454.6

 452.5

 450.7

 448.0

 445.9

 443.3

 441.4

 439.8

 437.6

 435.2

 433.0

 430.7

 428.5

 427.0

 425.4

 423.1

 421.5

 419.3

 417.7

 416.4

 415.9

STORAGE

-2.3

-3.4

-3.2

-2.1

-2.6

-2.2

-2.4

-2.5

-2.6

-1.9

-1.4

-2.1

-1.8

-2.7

-2.1

-2.6

-1.9

-1.6

-2.2

-2.3

-2.2

-2.3

-2.2

-1.5

-1.6

-2.3

-1.6

-2.2

-1.6

-1.3

-0.5

CHANGE

983

610

811

1,190

955

984

900

821

765

1,210

1,185

989

1,053

934

944

824

1,353

1,200

1,036

886

969

991

992

1,329

1,322

1,079

1,284

1,174

1,311

1,516

1,827

INFLOW

 2,032

 2,214

 2,304

 2,098

 2,142

 1,992

 2,021

 1,981

 1,993

 2,041

 1,788

 1,939

 1,854

 2,218

 1,886

 2,025

 2,220

 1,918

 2,048

 1,967

 2,000

 2,048

 1,968

 1,978

 2,007

 2,131

 2,006

 2,181

 1,987

 2,089

 1,978

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 88

 79

 104

 116

 113

 98

 91

 87

 96

 102

 108

 98

 94

 92

 93

 96

 90

 87

 91

 93

 94

 100

 104

 103

 100

 97

 98

 94

 99

 98

 97

PUMPING

 34

 26

 34

 15

 8

 10

 10

 10

 10

 13

 5

 8

 10

 10

 10

 10

 7

 7

 5

 7

 7

 12

 15

 10

 10

 7

 10

 10

 10

 7

 2

C.F.S.

 .13

 .10

 .13

 .06

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 10, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -65.2 33,427 63,054 0 0 3,000 349 1.39 .15

ACRE-FEET -65,200 66,302 125,068 0 0 5,951 692

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 125,068

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 5,951

TOTAL 131,019

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 3.40

 481.3

OUTLET 0 .15
§ 24.303 Formula wine record. A proprietor who produces beverage formula wine shall maintain records showing by transaction date the details of production. The formula wine record will contain the following: ( a ) A number for each lot produced;
( b ) The approved formula number for each lot;
( c ) The volume of wine used in the production;
( d ) The volume produced and the gain or loss resulting from the production of each lot as determined by comparing the volume finished with the volume used (report the total loss or gain on the TTB F 5120.17 for the period in question);
( e ) An explanation of any unusual loss or gain;
( f ) The production of essences showing the formula number, quantities of spirits and herbs used, and the amount produced;
( g ) The quantity of essences purchased, and the use, transfer or other disposition of essences produced or purchased; and
( h ) A record of the receipt and use or other disposition of all herbs, aromatics, essences, extracts, or other flavoring materials used in the production of formula wine.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0059, 1512-0216 and 1512-0298) [T.D. ATF-299, 55 FR 24989, June 19, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-338, 58 FR 19065, Apr. 12, 1993]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 30, 2011 

y0323 

Order 

 

March 30, 2011 

140988 

TIMOTHY WARD 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140988 

 COA: 284994 

Kent CC: 04-006032-NF 

TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 27, 2010, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 

2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Wilcox v State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (Docket No. 138602). On order of the 

Court, leave to appeal having been denied in Wilcox, 488 Mich 930 (2010), the 

application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
EXHIBIT 3.80
 Operating Agreement  Of  Sequatchie Valley Urology, LLC
  Name and Address
    
    Percentage Ownership
    
    Initial Capital ContributionHTI Hospital Holdings, Inc.
    
    100%
    
    $1,000.00One Park PlazaNashville, Tennessee 37203
  ARTICLE I
 OFFICES
   ARTICLE II
 MEMBERS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 MANAGERS
      3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
    5




---



##### 



SECTION 7. SECRETARY. The Secretary shall:
      6




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 CONTRACTS, LOANS, CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
  7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
 TRANSFER OF PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
  ARTICLE VII
 FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE VIII
 DISTRIBUTIONS
  ARTICLE IX
 SEAL
  8




---



##### 



ARTICLE X
 WAIVER OF NOTICE
  ARTICLE XI
 INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND MANAGERS
  ARTICLE XII
 AMENDMENTS
  9




---



##### 



th
 HTI Hospital Holdings, Inc., sole memberBy:
    /s/ Dora A. BlackwoodDora A. BlackwoodVice President and Assistant Secretary 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 499.04

 498.45

 497.64

 497.25

 496.63

 495.99

 495.27

 494.74

 494.25

 493.66

 493.29

 492.96

 492.50

 492.03

 491.94

 491.93

 492.26

 492.80

 493.45

 494.09

 494.95

 495.80

 496.50

 497.19

 497.87

 498.40

 498.82

 499.45

 500.53

 501.26

 1,496,681

 1,489,934

 1,480,689

 1,476,244

 1,469,188

 1,461,916

 1,453,750

 1,447,748

 1,442,207

 1,435,545

 1,431,372

 1,427,654

 1,422,477

 1,417,193

 1,416,182

 1,416,070

 1,419,778

 1,425,852

 1,433,176

 1,440,399

 1,450,125

 1,459,760

 1,467,710

 1,475,561

 1,483,312

 1,489,363

 1,494,164

 1,501,376

 1,513,765

 1,522,160

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 348

 7,357

 2,453

 3,363

 5,209

 7,400

 7,378

 3,660

 5,047

 3,538

 1,803

 2,652

 2,356

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,633

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 9, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2017 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 20,212 3,633 0 52,962

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-5,267

-6,747

-9,245

-4,445

-7,056

-7,272

-8,166

-6,002

-5,541

-6,662

-4,173

-3,718

-5,177

-5,284

-1,011

-112

 3,708

 6,074

 7,324

 7,223

 9,726

 9,635

 7,950

 7,851

 7,751

 6,051

 4,801

 7,212

 12,389

 8,395

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

2,007

2,180

14

13

42

2,553

44

987

10

45

58

-20

5

-3,549

-113

-50

-277

23

7,154

2,194

2,939

4,914

7,168

7,117

3,366

5,102

3,263

1,556

2,177

2,040

ELEV STORAGE

 52,564

 740,341

 742,521

 742,535

 742,548

 742,590

 745,143

 745,187

 746,174

 746,184

 746,229

 746,287

 746,267

 746,272

 742,723

 742,610

 742,560

 742,283

 742,306

 749,460

 751,654

 754,593

 759,507

 766,675

 773,792

 777,158

 782,260

 785,523

 787,079

 789,256

 791,296

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 738,334

2,000

2,000

0

0

0

2,500

0

800

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7,300