alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.415 Marks on containers of Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands spirits. ( a ) *Packages from Puerto Rico.* When a proprietor receives packages of Puerto Rican spirits on bonded premises under the provisions of this subpart, the markings required under § 26.40 of this chapter will be acceptable in place of the markings required under § 19.414. However, the proprietor still must mark each package to show the date of fill as required under § 19.410, and must include on each package the words “Puerto Rican” or the abbreviation “P.R.”.
( b ) *Packages from the Virgin Islands.* When a proprietor receives packages of Virgin Islands spirits on bonded premises under the provisions of this subpart, the markings required under § 26.206 of this chapter will be acceptable in place of the markings required under § 19.414. However, the proprietor still must mark each package to show the date of fill as required under § 19.410, and must include on each package the words “Virgin Islands” or the abbreviation “V.I.”.
( c ) *Portable bulk containers.* Portable bulk containers of Puerto Rican or Virgin Islands spirits that are filled on bonded premises must be marked in accordance with § 19.484. In addition, those containers must be marked with the serial number of any approved formula under which they were produced and with the words “Puerto Rican” or the abbreviation “P.R.” or “Virgin Islands” or the “V.I.”, as applicable.
( d ) *Cases of bottled alcohol.* Alcohol from Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands that is bottled and cased on bonded premises must be marked as required by § 19.496. In addition, the words “Puerto Rican” or “Virgin Islands” or the abbreviation “P.R.” or “V.I.”, respectively, must precede the word “alcohol” designation on the cases.
(26 U.S.C. 5206, 5235)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1123, Jan. 4, 2017]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Walter A. Shephard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Zygo Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zygo Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zygo Corporation and will be retained by Zygo Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 17, 2010

/s/ Walter A. Shephard  Walter A. ShephardVice President, Finance,Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer ofZygo Corporation
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCorVu Corporation  (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Justin M. MacIntosh,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   February 13, 2003 |                    |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            |                    |
|                            |                    |
|                            | /s/ David C. Carlson    |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRELY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             139
<SECURITIES>                                       900
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (89)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,945
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,749
<PP&E>                                           2,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,170)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,705
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,381
<SALES>                                         21,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,993
<CGS>                                           15,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    232
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
(No. 6968

#### Forrest H. Riordan, III, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February*9, *1973.*

Dr. Forrest H. Riordan, III, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Terra Block International, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 1992 and Section 1350 of 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.C. 63.
----------

I, James E. Hines the Chief Financial Officer of Terra Block International, Inc.
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Terra Block International, Inc. quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the annual report on Form 10-QSB and
the financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Terra Block
International, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2003       /s/ James E. Hines
                              ------------------
                              James E. Hines
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Terra Block International, Inc.


<PAGE>
(No. 6928

#### Beulah Ray, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

Hersch Y. Franks, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting; and
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.36

 1,198.94

 1,199.18

 1,198.85

 1,198.68

 1,198.62

 1,198.87

 1,198.98

 1,199.05

 1,199.09

 1,198.89

 1,198.74

 1,198.64

 1,198.58

 1,198.54

 1,198.50

 1,198.49

 1,198.51

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.45

 1,198.43

 1,198.42

 1,198.41

 1,198.39

 1,198.39

 1,198.39

 48.44

 48.44

 48.44

 48.44

 48.53

 49.56

 49.99

 49.40

 49.09

 48.99

 49.43

 49.63

 49.75

 49.83

 49.47

 49.20

 49.02

 48.92

 48.85

 48.78

 48.76

 48.79

 48.76

 48.72

 48.69

 48.65

 48.63

 48.62

 48.58

 48.58

 48.58

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.09

+1.03

+0.43

-0.59

-0.30

-0.11

+0.44

+0.20

+0.13

+0.07

-0.36

-0.27

-0.18

-0.11

-0.07

-0.07

-0.02

+0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

56

70

67

62

143

1,266

1,324

328

260

289

872

901

1,058

1,002

496

349

277

247

221

182

203

246

188

170

152

138

137

128

105

122

122

INFLOW

 59

 59

 59

 59

 92

 738

 1,100

 617

 407

 337

 644

 795

 897

 957

 670

 479

 360

 292

 250

 210

 201

 220

 201

 182

 164

 147

 138

 130

 114

 114

 114

SPILL

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

OUTLET

 4

 9

 6

 1

 5

 7

 5

 6

 4

 3

 2

 5

 6

 7

 4

 3

 5

 6

 5

 6

 9

 6

 3

 4

 4

 7

 6

 5

 7

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .07

 .16

 .10

 .02

 .09

 .12

 .09

 .11

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .16

 .11

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .12

 .10

 .09

 .13

 .11

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .54

 .90

 .80

 .00

 .11

 .16

 .40

 .39

 .35

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/24/2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.09 11,181 62 10,806 162 2.87 3.97

ACRE-FEET +90 22,178 123 21,434 321

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 21,434

OUTLET

TOTAL

 123

 21,557

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.97

JULY 1, 2015 10.73

 48.46
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMES D. SCHNELLER,

Petitioner

v.

CLERK OF COURTS OF THE FIRST

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; PROTHONOTARY OF

THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 40 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of May

, 2017, the Petition for Peremptory Writ of

Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.
### §3102. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "Trade Representative" means the United States Trade Representative.

(2) The term "telecommunications product" means—

(A) any paging devices provided for under item 685.65 of such Schedules, and

(B) any article classified under any of the following item numbers of such Schedules:

684.57      684.67      685.28      685.39

684.58      684.80      685.30      685.48

684.59      685.16      685.31      688.17

684.65      685.24      685.33      688.41

684.66      685.25      685.34      707.90.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1373, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1217.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Such Schedules, referred to in par. (2), to be treated as a reference to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, pursuant to section 3012 of this title. The Harmonized Tariff Schedule is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section 1202 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

B.R.C. S.r.l. 

Milan, Italy 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed open Registration Statements: (a) the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 33-38649); (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-07035); (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-62889); (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-44085); (e) the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-71544); (f) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-82110); (g) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-88690); (h) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-102069); (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-102068);(j) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-120029); and (k) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-118689) of our report dated February 25, 2005, except for Note 15 as to which the date is March 31, 2005, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of B.R.C. S.r.l. appearing in the IMPCO Technologies, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ BDO Sala Scelsi Farina S.p.A. 

 

BDO Sala Scelsi Farina S.p.A. 

Milan, Italy 

June 28, 2005
### §2485. Voluntary limitations on exports of steel to United States

No person shall be liable for damages, penalties, or other sanctions under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] or the Antitrust Acts (as defined in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 44]), or under any similar State law, on account of his negotiating, entering into, participating in, or implementing an arrangement providing for the voluntary limitation on exports of steel and steel products to the United States, or any modification or renewal of such an arrangement, if such arrangement or such modification or renewal—

(1) was undertaken prior to January 3, 1975, at the request of the Secretary of State or his delegate, and

(2) ceases to be effective not later than January 1, 1975.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §607, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2073.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of Title 15 and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 465

 467

 469

 462

 450

 446

 435

 428

 421

 423

 414

 411

 406

 394

 399

 398

 397

 408

 408

 391

 396

 391

 389

 383

 376

 368

 360

 366

 363

 366

 364

 455

 448

 440

 409

 368

 365

 407

 409

 379

 388

 365

 382

 342

 317

 330

 313

 319

 348

 377

 347

 382

 378

 376

 361

 361

 352

 350

 343

 336

 325

 334

 460

 459

 454

 445

 435

 423

 422

 419

 415

 408

 400

 401

 386

 356

 369

 353

 356

 384

 393

 379

 387

 386

 382

 376

 368

 360

 355

 351

 349

 345

 350

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 403.46

 404.45

 405.43

 405.78

 406.04

 406.43

 406.92

 409.00

 410.88

 412.30

 414.69

 415.95

 416.78

 417.49

 418.07

 418.40

 418.85

 419.07

 419.38

 419.79

 420.16

 420.48

 420.94

 421.43

 421.89

 422.65

 423.47

 424.67

 425.50

 426.01

 426.56

 402.9

 409.8

 416.6

 419.1

 421.0

 423.8

 427.3

 442.4

 456.4

 467.1

 485.6

 495.4

 502.0

 507.7

 512.3

 515.0

 518.6

 520.4

 522.9

 526.3

 529.3

 531.9

 535.7

 539.8

 543.6

 550.0

 556.9

 567.1

 574.2

 578.6

 583.4

STORAGE

+11.7

+6.9

+6.9

+2.5

+1.8

+2.8

+3.5

+15.1

+14.0

+10.7

+18.4

+9.9

+6.6

+5.7

+4.6

+2.7

+3.6

+1.8

+2.5

+3.3

+3.0

+2.6

+3.8

+4.1

+3.8

+6.4

+6.9

+10.2

+7.1

+4.4

+4.8

CHANGE

7,343

5,190

4,464

2,828

2,498

2,783

3,351

8,953

8,866

7,082

10,760

6,647

4,777

4,232

3,798

2,557

3,149

2,871

2,888

3,070

3,114

3,230

3,394

3,738

3,604

4,562

5,464

6,744

4,915

3,589

4,075

INFLOW

 1,304

 1,631

 862

 1,470

 1,483

 1,287

 1,477

 1,212

 1,718

 1,520

 1,383

 1,592

 1,374

 1,288

 1,367

 1,120

 1,224

 1,878

 1,533

 1,299

 1,478

 1,805

 1,389

 1,597

 1,589

 1,257

 1,896

 1,521

 1,244

 1,284

 1,535

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 37

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 87

 87

 88

 87

 85

 87

 86

 90

 96

 96

 80

 77

 79

 79

 80

 80

 81

 86

 81

 67

 106

 98

 90

 89

 89

 90

 85

 81

 81

 92

 90

PUMPING

 47

 0

 38

 22

 0

 0

 19

 20

 0

 13

 13

 0

 8

 8

 8

 11

 11

 5

 0

 19

 3

 0

 6

 3

 0

 8

 0

 0

 0

 0

 44

C.F.S.

 .20

 .00

 .16

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .08

 .00

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

INCHES

 2.26

 .02

 .56

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .07

 .64

 .62

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 1.03

 1.03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 22, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +192.1 144,536 44,617 5 37 2,670 306 1.19 6.97

ACRE-FEET +192,100 286,687 88,498 10 73 5,296 607

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 88,498

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 10

 5,296

TOTAL 93,877

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 19.49

 391.2

OUTLET 73 6.97

Table 11
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2021

No. 04-21-00421-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., J.V.C., AND J.P.C. III, CHILDREN

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00604

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s September 2, 2021 order terminating 

appellant’s parental rights. When an appeal is accelerated, the notice of appeal is due within 

twenty days after the appealable order is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b). The filing of a 

request for findings of fact or a motion for new trial does not extend the time to perfect an 

accelerated appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.1(b); In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 925-27 (Tex. 2005). 

The court may grant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal if the notice and a motion 

for extension of time are filed within fifteen days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 28.1(b). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an 

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but 

within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of 

time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 615 (1997) (construing predecessor to Rule 26). 

However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal 

timely. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); see Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886-

87 (Tex. 2003) (holding “a reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement of circumstances 

indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional, but was result of 

inadvertence, mistake or mischance, and “any conduct short of deliberate or intentional 

noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance”).

The notice of appeal was due September 22, 2021, twenty days after the trial court’s 

order was signed, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen 

days later on October 7, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 26.3. Appellant J.Y.G. filed the 

notice of appeal on September 28, 2021 but did not file a motion for extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal. 

We therefore order a response due by October 25, 2021 offering a reasonable 

explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. If appellant fails to satisfactorily 

respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). 

Appellant has the burden to request the trial court clerk prepare a supplemental clerk’s record 

FILE COPY
containing all necessary pleadings and orders to establish this court’s jurisdiction. Appellant 

must file a copy of any such request with this court. 

All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Barbara S. Anderson *v.*Nils Anderson III

*Edgar W. Bassick III,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Edward J. Holahan, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

Argued February 2

decided February 2, 1971

The motion by the plaintiff to set aside the judgment of the trial court and for an order directing judgment to be entered for the plaintiff in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied with direction that counsel call Practice Book § 616 to the attention of the clerk of the Superior Court.