alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Louis F. Greene and Henry E. Knight, Jr., Copartners, under the Name of Greene & Knight, Respondents, v. Annie E. Peck, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the alleged statements were improperly admitted in evidence. Jenks, P. J.. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5472 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5472

 To redesignate the Jimmy Carter National Historic Site as the ``Jimmy 
                   Carter National Historical Park''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2019

 Mr. Bishop of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Austin 
 Scott of Georgia, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Allen, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Johnson of 
  Georgia, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Carter of 
Georgia, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Collins of Georgia, and 
 Mr. Woodall) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Jimmy Carter National Historic Site as the ``Jimmy 
                   Carter National Historical Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jimmy Carter National Historical 
Park Redesignation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF JIMMY CARTER NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) In General.--The Jimmy Carter National Historic Site shall be 
known and designated as the ``Jimmy Carter National Historical Park''.
    (b) Amendments to Public Law 100-206.--Public Law 100-206 (54 
U.S.C. 320101 note; 101 Stat. 1434) is amended--
            (1) in section 1(a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 
        by striking ``National Historic Site'' and inserting ``National 
        Historical Park'';
            (2) in section 3--
                    (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``provisions of 
                law generally applicable to national historic sites'' 
                and inserting ``provisions of law generally applicable 
                to units of the National Park System''; and
                    (B) in subsection (d), in the second sentence, by 
                striking ``National Historic Site'' and inserting 
                ``National Historical Park'';
            (3) in section 6(2), by striking ``National Historic Site'' 
        and inserting ``National Historical Park'';
            (4) by striking ``historic site'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``historical park'';
            (5) by striking ``historic site'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``historical park''; and
            (6) by striking ``Historic Site'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``Historical Park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, document, 
record, map, or other paper of the United States to the Jimmy Carter 
National Historic Site shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Jimmy Carter National Historical Park''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 300

 271

 278

 343

 525

 872

 792

 682

 599

 674

 762

 1,105

 1,735

 2,119

 1,633

 1,128

 1,060

 1,101

 672

 412

 402

 360

 436

 373

 330

 341

 358

 312

 351

 370

 393

 227

 200

 209

 217

 227

 235

 240

 239

 235

 230

 230

 232

 234

 265

 271

 264

 248

 243

 241

 232

 225

 217

 218

 201

 198

 205

 205

 201

 199

 204

 211

 246

 226

 228

 250

 290

 343

 334

 314

 296

 290

 339

 396

 543

 535

 497

 385

 385

 371

 307

 274

 269

 253

 275

 252

 242

 235

 239

 227

 233

 245

 254

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,765

 3,717

 3,663

 3,625

 3,629

 3,684

 3,706

 3,746

 3,783

 3,820

 3,908

 4,056

 4,351

 4,630

 4,881

 5,040

 5,197

 5,318

 5,335

 5,266

 5,201

 5,140

 5,119

 5,081

 4,984

 4,823

 4,519

 4,211

 3,947

 3,807

 3,676

 269

 266

 262

 259

 259

 263

 265

 268

 270

 273

 279

 290

 311

 331

 349

 360

 371

 380

 381

 376

 372

 367

 366

 363

 356

 345

 323

 301

 282

 272

 263

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of
IMPCO Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert M. Stemmler, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 22, 2004 |  | /s/    ROBERT M. STEMMLER                               
|                     |  | Robert M. Stemmler President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 106.21 Admission. ( a ) *Status generally.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which this subpart applies.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which this subpart applies shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission which has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria which do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Parental, family, or marital status; pregnancy or related conditions.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which this subpart applies: ( 1 ) Must treat pregnancy or related conditions in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary medical conditions; and
( 2 ) Must not: ( i ) Adopt or implement any policy, practice, or procedure concerning the current, potential, or past parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( ii ) Discriminate against any person on the basis of current, potential, or past pregnancy or related conditions, or adopt or implement any policy, practice, or procedure that so discriminates; and
( iii ) Make a pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss or Mrs.” A recipient may ask an applicant to self-identify their sex, but only if this question is asked of all applicants and if the response is not used as a basis for discrimination prohibited by this part.
[45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 30579, May 19, 2020; 89 FR 33886, Apr. 29, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS BEING FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION S-T
AND INCLUDES AUDITED SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,693
<SECURITIES>                                    37,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,316
<INVENTORY>                                    123,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,031
<PP&E>                                         167,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,800
<BONDS>                                         94,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,364
<SALES>                                        517,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               524,037
<CGS>                                          347,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  347,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,029
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,747
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
#### Florence Tlusty, by Abraham Tlusty, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Anna J. Doyle, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 25.56 Filing of formulas. ( a ) *What are the general requirements for filing a formula?* ( 1 ) You must file your formula in writing. Your formula must identify each brewery where the formula applies by including each brewery name, address, and registry number.
( 2 ) You must serially number each formula, commencing with “1” and continuing in numerical sequence.
( 3 ) You must date and sign each formula.
( 4 ) You must file two copies of each formula with TTB.
( b ) *Where do I file a formula?* File your formula with the Assistant Chief, Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
(26 U.S.C. 5401, 7805)
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company .





/s/
      Kenneth BosketKenneth
      BosketCEODated:
      August 7, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period from ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Crown Equity
..





/s/
      Montse ZamanMontse
      ZamanCFODated:
      August 7, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Crown Equity for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,054

 1,068

 1,070

 1,093

 1,105

 1,134

 1,116

 1,256

 1,205

 1,038

 1,001

 961

 920

 864

 880

 817

 735

 702

 690

 663

 657

 626

 583

 581

 550

 530

 526

 501

 476

 486

 478

 803

 810

 803

 787

 801

 790

 775

 857

 885

 871

 801

 841

 815

 794

 709

 713

 659

 594

 606

 574

 526

 505

 461

 480

 463

 464

 465

 419

 423

 437

 444

 929

 910

 912

 923

 927

 937

 940

 1,007

 986

 936

 902

 884

 857

 835

 820

 776

 699

 665

 641

 622

 596

 573

 527

 525

 510

 490

 494

 475

 457

 461

 459

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.193 Articles for export. ( a ) Articles approved without qualification, including articles made in accordance with one of the general-use formulas in §§ 20.111 through 20.124, may be exported without restriction.
( b ) For each article for which the approved formula is endorsed “For Export Only” the manufacturer shall: ( 1 ) Label the immediate container to clearly show that the article is for export (for example, with the words “For export only”, “Not for sale in the United States”, or “Manufactured for sale in ______”);
( 2 ) Mark the shipping containers and cases with the words “For Export”;
( 3 ) Export the article directly; and
( 4 ) Retain appropriate documentation, such as invoices and bills of lading, as evidence that the article was, in fact, exported.
( c ) All articles for export shall comply with the applicable requirements of the countries to which they are sent.
[T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59460, Aug. 30, 2016]
(No. 6662

#### The Nash Engineering Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

The Nash Engineering Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### SUBCHAPTER II—STATE READING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Elva  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Eric
Danon,  Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) and Chief Financial
Officer (or equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




Date: May 27, 2005

/s/ Eric Danon
-----------------------------------------------
Eric Danon
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)


----------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,218

 2,334

 2,243

 2,567

 2,973

 3,467

 2,928

 2,569

 2,462

 2,649

 2,530

 1,484

 1,957

 2,051

 2,423

 3,460

 3,444

 4,045

 4,710

 5,075

 4,947

 4,717

 4,542

 3,954

 4,326

 3,402

 3,761

 3,764

 3,890

 4,475

 3,693

 240

 273

 308

 322

 263

 384

 282

 291

 318

 316

 318

 245

 246

 272

 228

 303

 307

 352

 350

 402

 371

 520

 455

 487

 425

 358

 331

 346

 356

 359

 275

 614

 648

 734

 926

 1,026

 1,147

 956

 893

 1,030

 1,146

 982

 611

 550

 581

 668

 963

 1,027

 1,221

 1,543

 1,734

 1,862

 1,656

 1,586

 1,664

 1,576

 1,172

 1,026

 1,001

 1,065

 1,316

 1,134

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 12,428

 12,584

 12,624

 12,647

 12,454

 12,354

 11,755

 11,506

 11,331

 11,583

 11,767

 11,799

 11,808

 11,844

 11,898

 12,213

 12,506

 12,801

 13,318

 13,905

 14,811

 15,574

 16,130

 16,648

 17,242

 17,803

 18,279

 18,699

 19,096

 19,449

 19,556

 888

 899

 902

 903

 890

 882

 840

 822

 809

 827

 841

 843

 843

 846

 850

 872

 893

 914

 951

 993

 1,058

 1,112

 1,152

 1,189

 1,232

 1,272

 1,306

 1,336

 1,364

 1,389

 1,397

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 675.34 Multi-Institutional job location and development programs. ( a ) An institution participating in the FWS program may enter into a written agreement to establish and operate job location programs for its students with other participating institutions.
( b ) The agreement described in paragraph (a) of this section must— ( 1 ) Designate the administrator of the program; and
( 2 ) Specify the terms, conditions, and performance standards of the program.
( c ) Each institution shall retain responsibility for the proper disbursement of the Federal funds it contributes under an agreement with other eligible institutions.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0535) (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2756)
[52 FR 45770, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 49147, Dec. 6, 1988; 59 FR 61417, Nov. 30, 1994]
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|                                      |  |                                |                | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | -------------- | 
|                                      |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of
|Name of Subsidiary                    |  | Incorporation or Organization 
|                                      |  |                               
|Tekelec Limited                       |  |                                | United Kingdom | 
|IEX Corporation                       |  |                                | Nevada         | 
|Tekelec France E.U.R.L.               |  |                                | France         | 
|Tekelec Canada Inc.                   |  |                                | Canada         | 
|Tekelec Germany GmbH                  |  |                                | Germany        | 
|Tekelec Italy srl                     |  |                                | Italy          | 
|Tekelec do Brasil Ltda.               |  |                                | Brazil         | 
|Tekelec Singapore Pte. Ltd.           |  |                                | Singapore      | 
|Tekelec Spain, S.L.                   |  |                                | Spain          | 
|Tekelec Beijing Representative Office |  |                                | China          | 
|Tekelec International Inc.            |  |                                | Delaware       | 
|Tekelec Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.     |  |                                | Mexico         | 
|Tekelec Systems India Private Limited |  |                                | India          | 
|Santera Systems Inc.                  |  |                                | Delaware       | 



---



|  |                                                                                                    
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|* | The subsidiaries of the Registrant do not do
    business under any name other than as listed above