alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt& Company Holdings (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of his knowledge:

 

•      The Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

•      The information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May7, 2004

 
| /s/  Carl D. Mautz                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Carl D.  Mautz                              |
|                                        |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided toWatson Wyatt & Company Holdings and will be retained by Watson Wyatt &Company Holdings and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
§ 79.4 What are the Secretary's general responsibilities under the Order? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70343 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary provides opportunities for consultation by elected officials of those state and local governments that would provide the nonfederal funds for, or that would be directly affected by, proposed federal financial assistance from the Department.
( b ) If a state adopts a process under the Order to review and coordinate proposed federal financial assistance, the Secretary, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the state process to determine official views of state and local elected officials;
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions;
( 3 ) Makes efforts to accommodate state and local elected official's concerns with proposed federal financial assistance that are communicated through the state process;
( 4 ) Allows the states to simplify and consolidate existing federally required state plan submissions;
( 5 ) Where state planning and budgeting systems are sufficient and where permitted by law, encourages the substitution of state plans for federally required state plans;
( 6 ) Seeks the coordination of views of affected state and local elected officials in one state with those of another state when proposed federal financial assistance has an impact on interstate metropolitan urban centers or other interstate areas; and
( 7 ) Supports state and local governments by discouraging the reauthorization or creation of any planning organization which is federally funded, which has a limited purpose, and which is not adequately representative of, or accountable to, state or local elected officials.
(Authority: E.O. 12372, Sec. 2)
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-201.10 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Protocol Amending the Treaty of 

May 6, 1931, and the Protocol of 

September 2, 1937 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GREECE 

Signed at Washington January 18, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GREECE 

 Extradition 

Protocol amending the treaty of 

 May 6, 1931, and Protocol of 

September 2, 1937. 

Signed at Washington January 18, 2006; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 28, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-14, 

 109th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 29, 2008 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-12, 

 110th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 September 23, 2008; 

Ratified by the President December 11, 2008; 

Exchange of Diplomatic Notes at 

 Washington September 9 and 15, 2009; 

Entered into force February 1, 2010.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0924 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-032-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### § 24.103 Other operations.

Upon the specific approval of the appropriate TTB officer, other operations not provided for in this part may be conducted on wine premises. Authority to conduct other operations may be obtained by submitting an application to the appropriate TTB officer. The application must specifically describe the operation to be conducted and the wine premises and equipment to be used. An appropriate TTB officer may make any inquiry necessary to determine whether the conduct of other operations on wine premises would jeopardize the revenue, conflict with wine operations, or be contrary to law. Other operations authorized under this section will be conducted in accordance with the conditions, limitations, procedures, and terms stated in the approved application. Authority to conduct other operations may be withdrawn whenever the appropriate TTB officer determines the conduct of the other operations on wine premises jeopardizes the revenue, conflicts with wine operations, or is contrary to law.

[T.D. ATF-409, 64 FR 13685, Mar. 22, 1999]
###### Editorial Note on Part 18

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 18.55 Label.

Each container of concentrate will have affixed thereto, before transfer, a label identifying the product and showing (a) the name of the proprietor; (b) the registry number of the plant; (c) the address of the plant; (d) the number of wine gallons; and (e) the percent of alcohol by volume.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0098)

[T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 22
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 22.113 Receipt of tax-free alcohol. ( a ) When tax-free alcohol is received, it shall be placed in the storage facilities prescribed by § 22.91 and kept there under lock until withdrawn for use. Unless required by city or State fire code regulations or authorized by the appropriate TTB officer or the terms of the permit, the permittee may not remove tax-free alcohol from the original packages or containers in which received until the alcohol is withdrawn for use. If the tax-free alcohol is transferred to “safety” containers in accordance with fire code regulations, the containers to which they are transferred shall be appropriately marked to identify the package from which transferred, the quantity transferred, the date of transfer, and the name and address of the vendor.
( b ) When tax-free alcohol is received, the permittee shall ascertain and account for any losses in transit in accordance with subpart I of this part. The permittee shall note any loss or deficiency in the shipment on the record of receipt.
( c ) Records of receipt shall consist of the consignors invoice or bill. Records of receipt may be filed in accordance with the permittee's own filing system as long as it does not cause inconvenience to appropriate TTB officers desiring to examine the records. The filing system shall systematically and accurately account for the receipt of all tax-free alcohol.
§ 19.596 Processing records in general. A proprietor who processes spirits must maintain daily records of transactions and operations in the processing account relating to: ( a ) The manufacture of distilled spirits products;
( b ) Finished products;
( c ) The denaturation of spirits; and
( d ) The manufacture of articles.
(26 U.S.C. 5207)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Photo Works, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the year ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, AndrewWood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Douglass, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Andrew Wood    |   | Date:  December 31, 2007 |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                |   |
| Andrew  Wood        |   |
|                |   |
| /s/  David Douglass |   |                          |
|                |   |
| David  Douglass     |   |

 

----
#### National Transportation Co., Inc., v. Emerald Cab Corporation et al., Impleaded with Others.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,727

 1,695

 1,771

 1,811

 1,958

 2,053

 2,086

 2,430

 2,484

 2,567

 2,570

 2,444

 2,394

 2,126

 1,891

 1,924

 1,882

 1,923

 1,956

 2,154

 2,463

 2,317

 2,068

 2,207

 2,194

 2,268

 2,397

 2,593

 2,757

 2,870

 846

 877

 893

 976

 974

 1,002

 1,020

 1,064

 1,134

 1,154

 1,167

 1,167

 1,180

 1,054

 1,048

 1,060

 1,065

 1,061

 1,060

 1,053

 1,118

 1,113

 1,045

 1,046

 1,058

 1,089

 1,175

 1,219

 1,274

 1,279

 1,145

 1,161

 1,236

 1,288

 1,308

 1,339

 1,346

 1,562

 1,608

 1,641

 1,692

 1,637

 1,546

 1,382

 1,338

 1,363

 1,360

 1,355

 1,369

 1,447

 1,504

 1,475

 1,372

 1,382

 1,433

 1,519

 1,608

 1,722

 1,843

 1,828

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 13,797

 14,136

 14,529

 14,956

 15,408

 15,883

 16,353

 16,966

 17,515

 18,051

 18,660

 19,195

 19,643

 19,891

 20,084

 20,286

 20,410

 20,477

 20,538

 20,646

 20,804

 20,717

 20,481

 20,222

 19,963

 19,845

 19,907

 20,247

 20,752

 21,217

 986

 1,010

 1,038

 1,068

 1,101

 1,135

 1,168

 1,212

 1,251

 1,289

 1,333

 1,371

 1,403

 1,421

 1,435

 1,449

 1,458

 1,463

 1,467

 1,475

 1,486

 1,480

 1,463

 1,444

 1,426

 1,418

 1,422

 1,446

 1,482

 1,516

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

JERSEY POINT TOP ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 73-CC-153

#### Charles Mc Corkle, Jr., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 18, 1973.*

Charles Mc Corkle, Jr., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 23, 2011
 Qlik Technologies Inc.
  Delaware

001-34803

20-1643718(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 150 N. Radnor Chester Road Suite E220
Radnor, Pennsylvania

19087(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 (888) 828-9768
 Not Applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
  o

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  QLIK TECHNOLOGIES INC.By:
    /s/ WILLIAM G. SORENSONName:
    William G. SorensonTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
DrpT Or wjmmmm Ilsa Renna 

47 Hillover Lane 

Sag Harbor, NY, 11963 

June 18*, 2010 

FAA, Docket Operations M-30 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590 0001 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

Reference: Docket # FAA 2010 0302, Helicopter Noise/Air Pollution Issue, Long Island, NY 

Thanlt yoiTfor yoiir support tb~mitigateii5ttcopter traffic noise over eastern Long Island. However, the.Rlpposfijd. 

FAA rules as stated do not adequately address the issues related to the towns of Southampton and East Hampton. 

I understand that, under proposed regulations, HHK i flying the NORTHERN route over Long Island Sound 

would be able veer off to reach East Hampton airport and pass over populated areas in Noyac and North Sea. 

Although the proposed 2,500 feet limitation is a step in the right direction, helicopters do not attain this altitude 

for several miles from the airport. Thus, the noise and air pollution and safety issues for the families living in 

Noyac, North Sea and Sag Harbor remain seriouscg 

In Noyac, North Sea and areas of Sag Harbor, we are also subjected to constant noise and air pollution resulting 

from large numbers of personal and corporate jets, seaplanes and various other fixed wing aircraft flying similar 

routes as helicopters. Helicopter noise and air pollution is but one area of concern, the other has vet to even be 

addressed! We know that fumes from aircraft fiiel are very dangerous pollutants yet neither our representatives 

nor the FAA has taken positive steps to shield the population or nature reserves in the area from this pollution. 

Helicopters using the NORTHERN route should be REQUIRED to stay over water until Orient Point, then travel 

over Gardiners Bay and Barcelona Neck directly into East Hampton airport. They should also be REQUIRED to 

follow the same route on return trips to New York. The land areas near this over-the-water route ~ Barcelona 

Neck in East Hampton and Mashomack Preserve on Shelter Island— are essentially unpopulated. 

The SOUTHERN route over the ocean would be the best choice, as it would disturb only a few people on a 

few large estates—^the people most likely to use East Hampton airport. I understand that currently less than 15% 

of helicopters or other aircraft aircraft use this ocean route. The additional cost to operators flying this route 

should not be considered above the safety and comfort of thousands of families in Noyac and North Sea. 

Kindly consider these comments as part of the public comment on the proposed regulations FAA 2010 0302. 

Thank you. 

Ilsa Renna 

Cc: Congressman Tim Bishop, Senator Charles Schumer
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear by T.D. ATF-477, 67 FR 18087 through 18090, Apr. 15, 2002.

§ 28.58 Operations or unit bond—distilled spirits. ( a ) *Spirits.* Where, as authorized in § 28.91, spirits are withdrawn without payment of tax, from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant on notice of the proprietor thereof, the approved operations or unit bond must cover such withdrawals if the proprietor is required to give a bond under part 19 of this chapter.
( b ) *Wine.* Where the provisions of part 19 of this chapter require an operations or unit bond to be given and approved to cover the operations of a distilled spirits plant and an adjacent bonded wine cellar, such bond will cover the withdrawal of wine without payment of tax, as authorized in § 28.121, from such bonded wine cellar on application for such withdrawal by the proprietor.
( c ) *Specially denatured spirits.* Where specially denatured spirits are withdrawn free of tax, as authorized in § 28.151, from the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant on application of the proprietor thereof, the proprietor shall file a consent of surety extending the terms of the operations or unit bond, which consent shall be in the following form:
The obligors agree to extend the terms of said bond to cover all liability that may be incurred on all specially denatured spirits withdrawn by the principal for exportation or transfer to a foreign-trade zone, for which satisfactory evidence of exportation, or of deposit in a foreign-trade zone, as required by law and regulations, is not submitted to the appropriate TTB officer.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1352, as amended, 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5175, 5214); Sec. 3, Pub. L. 91-659, 84 Stat. 1965, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066); Sec. 805, Pub. L. 96-39, 93 Stat. 276 (26 U.S.C. 5173))
[T.D. ATF-62, 44 FR 71721, Dec. 11, 1979, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3832, Jan. 27, 2004; T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1135, Jan. 4, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.76 Formula No. 40-B. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: One-sixteenth avoirdupois ounce of denatonium benzoate, N.F., and
1 ⁄ 8 gallon of *tert*-butyl alcohol.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 052. Inks. 111. Hair and scalp preparations. 112. Bay rum. 113. Lotions and creams (hand, face, and body). 114. Deodorants (body). 121. Perfumes and perfume tinctures. 122. Toilet waters and colognes. 141. Shampoos. 142. Soaps and bath preparations. 210. External pharmaceuticals, not U.S.P. or N.F. 410. Disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and other biocides. 450. Cleaning solutions (including household detergents). 470. Theater sprays, incense, and room deodorants.
485. Miscellaneous solutions.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses:
812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001; T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59461, Aug. 30, 2016]
AIR (FEDERAL)

Air (State)

‘TDSA (FEDERAL)

Tdsa (State)

TSA (FEDERAL)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Terra Block International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James E. Hines, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 13, 2004 | /s/ James E. Hines
James E. Hines
Chief Financial Officer of
Terra Block International, Inc.
|------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-857]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Market Test of Experimental Product: ``Gift Cards''

AGENCY: Postal Service \TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an 
experimental product in accordance with statutory requirements.

DATES: January 18, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Rubin, 202-268-2986.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin 
a market test of its ``Gift Cards'' experimental product on or around 
May 1, 2011. The Postal Service has filed with the Postal Regulatory 
Commission a notice setting out the basis for the Postal Service's 
determination that the market test is covered by 39 U.S.C. 3641 and 
describing the nature and scope of the market test. Documents are 
available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket No. MT2011-2.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011-857 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### Part C—Public Charter Schools