alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.26

 1,198.81

 1,198.64

 1,198.62

 1,198.54

 1,198.48

 1,198.43

 1,198.40

 1,198.38

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.34

 48.37

 48.36

 48.34

 48.34

 48.34

 48.34

 48.34

 48.30

 48.28

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.36

 49.33

 49.03

 48.99

 48.85

 48.75

 48.66

 48.60

 48.57

 48.53

 48.52

 48.55

 48.53

 48.50

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.05

+0.97

-0.30

-0.04

-0.14

-0.11

-0.09

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

+0.04

-0.02

-0.04

CHANGE

31

29

24

33

32

35

34

10

15

35

25

24

25

27

64

1,062

214

322

182

141

105

98

93

79

81

121

87

65

INFLOW

 36

 31

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 18

 14

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 31

 566

 360

 337

 250

 191

 147

 122

 107

 92

 85

 99

 92

 78

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 6

 5

 5

 4

 7

 6

 9

 9

 7

 6

 5

 6

 8

 5

 4

 5

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

C.F.S.

 .05

 .11

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .12

 .11

 .15

 .16

 .12

 .10

 .09

 .11

 .14

 .08

 .07

 .08

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .17

 .79

 .08

 .36

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .09

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/01/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.07 3,093 28 2,881 131 2.29 1.94

ACRE-FEET +70 6,135 56 5,714 260

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 5,714

OUTLET

TOTAL

 56

 5,770

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.94

JULY 1, 2010 12.69

 48.39
Exhibit 32.1

               Earth Products & Technologies, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Earth Products and Technologies, Inc. certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

..     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date:   March 24, 2006

                                    /s/ John W. Peters
                                   John W. Peters
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5301 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit certain individuals 

complying with State law to possess firearms. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2019 

Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. MULLIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit certain 

individuals complying with State law to possess firearms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GUN-FREE SCHOOL ZONES. 

4 Section 922(q)(2)(B)(ii) of title 18, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘licensed to do so by the 

6 State in which the school zone is located or a political sub7 division of the State, and the law of the State or political 

8 subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such 

9 a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or 

10 political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5301 IH

1 under law to receive the license’’ and inserting ‘‘in compli2 ance with the law of the State and political subdivision 

3 in which the school zone is located’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00694-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.C.

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006PA02372

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2011

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The trial court overruled appellant’s affidavit of indigence and determined his appeal was 

frivolous. Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 29, 2010. On March 10, 2011, this 

court ordered appellant, Mr. Robert Garza, pro se, to show cause in writing, no later than March 

21, 2011, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.8(a). Mr. Garza did not respond. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against Mr. Garza.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 507

 516

 494

 495

 488

 477

 469

 486

 489

 506

 503

 517

 525

 534

 541

 545

 554

 571

 576

 589

 604

 628

 663

 707

 773

 782

 802

 829

 878

 968

 1,028

 427

 428

 414

 411

 401

 397

 399

 399

 406

 415

 417

 424

 435

 437

 420

 416

 427

 439

 451

 474

 493

 505

 518

 539

 562

 583

 613

 646

 693

 756

 809

 455

 454

 442

 438

 427

 424

 428

 429

 437

 444

 450

 456

 467

 468

 455

 453

 465

 488

 503

 520

 538

 550

 568

 586

 623

 647

 671

 714

 778

 838

 892

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

HOLLAND TRACT ON OLD RIVER
Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 13 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 14 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 15 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 16 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 17 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 18 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 19 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 20 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 21 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 22 of 23

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 133    Filed 06/24/21    Entered 06/24/21 09:14:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 23 of 23
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

NICHOLAS DEL CIOTTO, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF ROCCO DEL CIOTTO,

Petitioner

v.

THE PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE 

UNIVERSITY OF PENN HEALTH 

SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF PENN 

HEALTH SYSTEM, ROBERT 

CENTRONE, D.O., ELECTRONIC 

SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC AND 

JEFFREY MITCHELL, MARK TESTA, 

D.O., AND STEINGARD & TESTA 

MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, HCR 

MANORCARE, INC AND HCR 

HEALTHCARE, LLC AND HEALTHCARE 

AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA, INTERSTATE REALITY 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, NORMA 

LOTTENGER,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 14 and 16 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2018, it is noted that the bankruptcy court 

recently granted the motion for entry of a final decree filed by HCR Manor Care Inc. See 

In re HCR Manor Care, Inc., No. 18-10467 (Bankr. D. Del.) (order dated October 2, 2018). 

As such, the instant “Application to Lift Bankruptcy Stay,” which seeks to lift the stay that 

had been imposed in the action in this Court due to the pendency of the bankruptcy

proceeding, is GRANTED. See 11 U.S.C. §362(c)(2)(A) (noting that the automatic stay 
[14 and 16 EM 2018] - 2

“continues until the earliest of” several conditions, including the time that the bankruptcy 

case is closed).

The Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is 

DENIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 407

 399

 387

 380

 370

 364

 357

 352

 342

 331

 328

 318

 309

 302

 303

 302

 304

 321

 331

 346

 357

 365

 378

 369

 373

 382

 392

 404

 406

 422

 438

 335

 333

 333

 331

 328

 311

 309

 277

 300

 291

 273

 265

 276

 270

 268

 278

 268

 265

 277

 289

 282

 279

 280

 286

 295

 306

 306

 321

 318

 334

 347

 373

 372

 367

 363

 354

 348

 335

 333

 326

 316

 307

 299

 296

 291

 290

 290

 291

 296

 305

 314

 321

 322

 326

 333

 336

 345

 348

 359

 360

 374

 385

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: DYNAMIC SPORTS PERFORMANCE, LLC:

:

: Case No. 20-12322-KHK

: Chapter 11

Debtor :

____________________________________:

SECTION 1188(c) STATUS CONFERENCE REPORT

The above-captioned debtor and debtor-in-possession (“Debtor”) has 

elected to file this case under subchapter V of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the 

United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Debtor files this report 

pursuant to Section 1188(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.

1. Type of Plan of Reorganization. The Debtor intends to pursue the 

following type of plan of reorganization in this case:

_X_ Consensual _____ Nonconsensual _____ Undetermined

2. Reasons for Type of Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor is a company that provides fitness classes, mostly online at the 

present, due to economic conditions at present created by the COVID-19 

pandemic. The total debt in this case is estimated at $20,139.98; It is hoped that 

the Debtor can pay this debt in regular payments over a three to five year period 

as the business recovers.

_____________

Nathan Fisher

Fisher-Sandler, LLC

3977 Chain Bridge Rd., #2

Fairfax, VA 22030

(703) 691-1642

VSB #37161

Case 20-12322-KHK Doc 26 Filed 12/01/20 Entered 12/01/20 18:40:05 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
3. Communications with Parties in Interest. The Debtor has had 

discussions with the following parties in interest concerning the Debtor’s 

plan of reorganization.

___ Secured Creditors

___ Priority Claimants

___ Unsecured Creditors

___ Equity Interest Holders

_x_ The Trustee

_x_ Others, Describe: Office of the United States Trustee personnel

4. General Nature of Communications with Parties in Interest.

The general nature of discussions has been that there is approximately

$20,139.98 in total debt; to pay this over a 3 to 5 year period would require a

monthly payment of roughly $400.00 to $500.00 per month. If the Debtor 

can recover from having to leave its training studio due to being unable to 

conduct in-person training in this economic environment, and can transition 

successfully to an online model, this can be achieved.

5. Efforts to formulate a Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor is working on filing a Plan of Reorganization and hopes to have a 

Plan of Reorganization filed prior to the Status Conference to be held on

December 15, 2020.

6. Timing for Filing Plan of Reorganization. Does Debtor intend to file a 

plan of reorganization with the 90-day deadline imposed by 11 U.S.C. 

Section 1189(b) of the Bankruptcy Code?

_x_ YES ___ NO

If “NO” is marked, please explain:

7. Additional Information.

Case 20-12322-KHK Doc 26 Filed 12/01/20 Entered 12/01/20 18:40:05 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Dated: December 1, 2020

By: /s/ Darius Gilbert

Darius Gilbert

Owner

/s/ Nathan Fisher

Nathan Fisher

Fisher-Sandler, LLC

3977 Chain Bridge Rd., #2

Fairfax, VA 22030

(703) 691-1642

VSB #37161 

Case 20-12322-KHK Doc 26 Filed 12/01/20 Entered 12/01/20 18:40:05 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
<pre>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of ConectiSys
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


        1.      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: January 14, 2008                    By:  /S/ ROBERT A. SPIGNO
                                                ---------------------
                                                Robert A. Spigno
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (principal executive officer)

Dated: January 14, 2008                    By:  /S/ ROBERT A. SPIGNO
                                                ----------------------
                                                Robert A. Spigno
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (principal financial officer)


        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Harry S. Gorgas, Respondent, v. Ida Perito, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously modified by providing for the payment of interest on the mortgage' from February 28, 1941, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Abraham Jacobs, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 27
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 27 appear by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11231, Mar. 13, 2002, and T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30799, May 8, 2002.

§ 27.41 Computation of effective tax rate. ( a ) The proprietor shall compute the effective tax rate for distilled spirits containing eligible wine or eligible flavors as the ratio of the numerator and denominator as follows: ( 1 ) The numerator will be the sum of: ( i ) The proof gallons of all distilled spirits used in the product (exclusive of distilled spirits derived from eligible flavors), multiplied by the tax rate prescribed by 26 U.S.C. 5001;
( ii ) The wine gallons of each eligible wine used in the product, multiplied by the tax rate prescribed by 26 U.S.C. 5041(b)(1), (2), or (3), as applicable; and
( iii ) The proof gallons of all distilled spirits derived from eligible flavors used in the product, multiplied by the tax rate prescribed by 26 U.S.C. 5001, but only to the extent that such distilled spirits exceed 21 ⁄ 2% of the denominator prescribed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) The denominator will be the sum of: ( i ) The proof gallons of all distilled spirits used in the product, including distilled spirits derived from eligible flavors; and
( ii ) The wine gallons of each eligible wine used in the product, multiplied by twice the percentage of alcohol by volume of each, divided by 100.
( b ) In determining the effective tax rate, quantities of distilled spirits, eligible wine, and eligible flavors will be expressed to the nearest tenth of a proof gallon. The effective tax rate may be rounded to as many decimal places as the proprietor deems appropriate, provided that, such rate is expressed no less exactly than the rate rounded to the nearest whole cent, and the effective tax rates for all products will be consistently expressed to the same number of decimal places. In such case, if the number is less than five it will be dropped; if it is five or over, a unit will be added.
( c ) The following is an example of the use of the formula.
Batch Record
Distilled spirits
2249.1 proof gallons. Eligible wine (14% alcohol by volume)
2265.0 wine gallons. Eligible wine (19% alcohol by volume)
1020.0 wine gallons. Eligible flavors
100.9 proof gallons.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0352) (Sec. 6, Pub. L. 96-598, 94 Stat. 3488, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5010))
[T.D. ATF-297, 55 FR 18069, Apr. 30, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-307, 55 FR 52742, Dec. 21, 1990. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-474, 67 FR 11232, Mar. 13, 2002] Footnotes -
27.41
[1] Proof gallons by which distilled spirits derived from eligible flavors exceed 21 2% of the total proof gallons in the batch (100.9 − (21 2%) × 3.371.8 = 16.6).
#### George O. Glendening, Respondent, v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS, Defendant.

(269 N. W. 85.)

(File No. 7892.

Opinion filed October 5, 1936.)

*Judge & Chapman,*of Sioux Falls, and *Hepperle & Fuller,*of Aberdeen, for Petitioners.

*Walter Conway,*Atty. Gen., and *Herman L. Bode,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for Respondent.

*Frank Wickhem,*of Sioux Falls, for Applicant Wilson Storage & Transfer Co.

PER 'CURIAM.

After a hearing the Board of Railroad Commissioners granted to the Wilson Storage & Transfer Company a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate a Class A motor carrier for the transportation of property. Thereafter the petitioners obtained from this court a writ of certiorari to review the order of the board! granting the certificate.

Since the granting of the writ by this court, the opinion in the case of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company v. Board of Railroad Commissioners 64 S. D. 297, 266 N. W. *581660, has been handed down. We find nothing in the instant case which convinces us that we should exercise our discretion and take original jurisdiction. We are therefore of the opinion that we improvidently issued the writ and it will be quashed and the proceedings dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

All the Judges concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.79

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.79

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.77

 360.60

 360.52

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 592

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 592

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 591

 579

 573

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-12

-6

CHANGE

 272

 251

 251

 261

 284

 306

 296

 280

 256

 256

 180

 45

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,503

 1,512

 1,504

 1,507

 1,506

 1,511

 1,509

 1,513

 1,507

 1,504

 1,504

 1,515

 1,504

 1,503

 1,508

 1,503

 1,504

 1,508

 1,501

 1,510

 1,509

 1,506

 1,506

 1,510

 1,509

 1,507

 1,513

 1,501

 1,505

 1,317

 1,071

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2007

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -19 0 46,090 2,938

ACRE-FEET -19 0 91,420 5,828

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 16,039

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 5,828

 113,287

 592

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 2,562

 2,536

 2,490

 2,508

 2,555

 2,582

 2,600

 2,573

 2,499

 2,497

 2,410

 1,812

 1,507

 1,499

 1,494

 1,492

 1,495

 1,496

 1,508

 1,527

 1,525

 1,526

 1,533

 1,530

 1,522

 1,525

 1,535

 1,518

 1,518

 1,329

 1,095

 57,798

 114,642

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 91,420

 742

 729

 713

 720

 725

 725

 726

 725

 701

 682

 656

 242

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,086

 16,039

RIVER CANALS

Table 14