alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                        16,214,633
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                    180,232
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,394,865
<PP&E>                        43,146,694
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                64,827,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,073,936
<BONDS>                       40,622,529
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                     4,164,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  64,827,971
<SALES>                       10,693,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              11,436,847
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  5,782,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 655,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             5,070,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (71,381)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,058,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                   241,260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                    (817,576)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (5.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (5.54)





</TABLE>
1/25/2021

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 548 1,942 2,490 1,087 3,851 4,938 0.0 0.0

2-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,869 1,869 0 3,708 3,708 0.0 0.0

3-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,850 1,850 0 3,669 3,669 0.0 0.0

4-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,803 1,803 0 3,577 3,577 0.0 0.0

5-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,801 1,801 0 3,573 3,573 0.0 0.0

6-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,802 1,802 0 3,575 3,575 0.0 0.0

7-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 625 1,802 2,428 1,240 3,575 4,815 0.0 0.0

8-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1,553 970 2,523 3,081 1,924 5,005 0.0 0.0

9-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 529 963 1,492 1,049 1,910 2,959 0.0 0.0

10-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 521 961 1,482 1,033 1,906 2,939 0.0 0.0

11-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1,173 962 2,135 2,326 1,909 4,235 0.0 0.0

12-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,374 965 2,339 2,726 1,914 4,640 0.0 0.0

13-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,482 1,826 3,308 2,939 3,622 6,561 0.0 0.0

14-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,046 1,839 2,885 2,075 3,648 5,723 0.0 0.0

15-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,046 1,838 2,884 2,075 3,645 5,720 0.0 0.0

16-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 941 1,838 2,779 1,867 3,646 5,513 0.0 0.0

17-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,498 1,847 3,345 2,972 3,663 6,635 0.0 0.0

18-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,043 1,844 3,887 4,052 3,658 7,710 0.0 0.0

19-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,083 1,837 3,920 4,132 3,643 7,775 0.0 0.0

20-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,943 1,835 3,778 3,854 3,640 7,494 0.0 0.0

21-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,729 1,833 3,562 3,430 3,636 7,066 0.0 0.0

22-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 2,597 1,831 4,428 5,152 3,631 8,783 0.0 0.0

23-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,782 971 3,753 5,518 1,926 7,444 0.0 0.0

24-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,335 979 4,314 6,615 1,942 8,557 0.0 0.0

25-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,077 989 4,066 6,104 1,961 8,065 0.0 0.0

26-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,967 987 3,955 5,886 1,958 7,844 0.0 0.0

27-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,577 987 3,564 5,112 1,958 7,070 0.0 0.0

28-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,069 980 4,049 6,088 1,944 8,032 0.0 0.0

29-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,198 970 4,168 6,343 1,924 8,267 0.0 0.0

30-Nov-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,961 969 3,930 5,874 1,922 7,796 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 8 0 8 XXXX 0 0 46,700 43,891 90,591 92,630 87,058 179,688 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks SWP CVP

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

NOVEMBER 2020

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Tracy Combined
Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 13 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 14 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 15 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 16 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 17 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 18 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 19 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 20 of 21

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 197    Filed 12/30/21    Entered 12/30/21 17:15:23    Desc MainDocument      Page 21 of 21
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1211 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and HUNGARY 

Signed at Budapest October 1, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
HUNGARY 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Budapest October 1, 2008; 

 Entered into force December 11, 2008.
(No. 75-CC-0016

#### County Of Johnson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 6, 1978.*

Mary Jane Reynolds Schaumleffel, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the Claimant, County of Johnson, and the Respondent, State of Illinois, and the Court, being fully advised in the premises find that this case arises pursuant to Ill.Rev.Stat. 1972, Ch. 53, paras. 8 and 31, and that Claimant is entitled to reimbursement for State’s Attorneys fees of $30.00 per case and County Clerk’s fees of $20.00 per case as follows:

> 72- CF-33 *People v. Elmer A. Holt*$50.00

> 73- CF-2 *People v. Michael Zito*50.00

> 73-CF-8 *People v. Monroe Hunter*50.00

> TOTAL $150.00

It is hereby ordered that the parties’ presence at a hearing and the filing of briefs is waived and in pursuance of that statutes, State of Illinois, as set out above, based on the Claimant’s complaint and attached bill of particulars, as revised by the parties and agreed and stipulated thereto, an award is hereby entered for Claimant in the amount of $150.00.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal  year ended September 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Tony Nick, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: December 16, 2019



|By: | /s/ Tony Nick                                                                                                
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Name: Tony Nick                                                                                              
|    | Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,571

 7,404

 8,384

 8,439

 8,367

 7,860

 7,807

 7,920

 7,399

 7,415

 6,445

 6,004

 5,975

 5,618

 6,700

 5,878

 6,603

 6,305

 6,438

 6,442

 6,215

 5,856

 6,210

 5,340

 5,133

 5,397

 5,362

 5,248

 6,126

 6,038

 6,224

 1,141

 1,329

 1,339

 1,199

 1,184

 684

 638

 1,272

 769

 949

 886

 823

 778

 941

 1,053

 716

 938

 772

 771

 615

 851

 486

 750

 730

 905

 910

 906

 878

 826

 823

 905

 3,185

 3,922

 4,626

 4,721

 4,520

 4,337

 4,134

 4,359

 4,009

 4,025

 3,739

 3,241

 2,954

 2,938

 3,403

 3,369

 3,529

 3,390

 3,172

 3,436

 3,164

 2,751

 3,073

 2,960

 2,813

 2,776

 2,567

 2,597

 2,800

 2,890

 3,286

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 45,346

 46,560

 47,945

 48,854

 48,930

 49,598

 50,024

 50,462

 50,830

 52,182

 53,548

 54,130

 54,429

 54,710

 54,928

 54,375

 53,278

 51,947

 50,599

 49,698

 48,728

 47,120

 46,184

 45,119

 44,193

 43,728

 43,341

 43,000

 42,397

 41,918

 41,675

 3,239

 3,326

 3,425

 3,490

 3,495

 3,543

 3,573

 3,604

 3,631

 3,727

 3,825

 3,866

 3,888

 3,908

 3,923

 3,884

 3,806

 3,711

 3,614

 3,550

 3,481

 3,366

 3,299

 3,223

 3,157

 3,123

 3,096

 3,071

 3,028

 2,994

 2,977

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Bocci, Appellant.

(No. 110 E.)

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment for the reasons assigned in his dissent in *People*v. *Giffone (supra).*
### §498. Military or naval discharge certificates

Whoever forges, counterfeits, or falsely alters any certificate of discharge from the military or naval service of the United States, or uses, unlawfully possesses or exhibits any such certificate, knowing the same to be forged, counterfeited, or falsely altered, shall be fined under this title 1 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940, ed., §136 (Mar. 4, 1917, ch. 180, 39 Stat. 1182).

Reference to any person causing, procuring, aiding or assisting was omitted as unnecessary as such persons are made principals by section 2 of this title.

At the end of this section words "in the discretion of the court" were omitted as unnecessary, as the punishment provisions, being framed in the alternative by the use of the disjunctive "or," vest in the court the power to impose a fine or prison sentence in its discretion.

Changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, which directed the amendment of this section by substituting "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000", was executed by making the substitution for "fined not more than $1,000", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See 1994 Amendment note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.20

 1,198.19

 1,198.18

 1,198.17

 1,198.16

 1,198.15

 1,198.14

 1,198.13

 1,198.11

 1,198.09

 1,198.08

 1,198.07

 1,198.06

 1,198.05

 1,198.04

 1,198.03

 1,198.01

 1,197.99

 1,197.97

 1,197.94

 1,197.92

 1,197.88

 1,197.84

 1,197.82

 1,197.78

 1,197.74

 1,197.71

 1,197.68

 1,197.65

 1,197.61

 1,197.59

 48.25

 48.23

 48.21

 48.20

 48.18

 48.16

 48.14

 48.13

 48.09

 48.05

 48.04

 48.02

 48.00

 47.98

 47.97

 47.95

 47.91

 47.88

 47.84

 47.79

 47.76

 47.69

 47.62

 47.58

 47.51

 47.45

 47.39

 47.34

 47.29

 47.22

 47.19

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

-0.04

-0.07

-0.07

-0.04

-0.07

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.04

CHANGE

18

12

7

6

9

8

10

6

-5

-2

3

8

9

9

12

15

2

5

16

9

17

-1

-8

18

6

0

10

10

7

-1

16

INFLOW

 8

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 13

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 18

 17

 15

 14

 17

 16

 18

 14

 12

 15

 11

 16

 17

 17

 20

 23

 19

 22

 21

 20

 20

 19

 12

 21

 26

 20

 21

 21

 18

 19

 19

C.F.S.

 .32

 .29

 .27

 .24

 .29

 .28

 .31

 .25

 .21

 .26

 .19

 .28

 .29

 .29

 .35

 .41

 .34

 .39

 .37

 .35

 .35

 .34

 .22

 .37

 .46

 .35

 .37

 .37

 .32

 .34

 .33

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/06/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.15 231 211 11 558 9.80 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,150 458 419 22 1,107

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 22

OUTLET

TOTAL

 419

 441

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2005 .00

 48.27
DENIED and Opinion Filed November 14, 2023

In t he 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 23
- 01119
- CV IN RE SHEDRICK THORN TON , Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F1970256 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court is relator ’ s November 7, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator argues the trial court has not ruled on a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc that relator contends he filed on September 28, 2023. He asks this Court to compel the trial court to reform the judgment to give him credit for time served. W e deny the petition. To establish the right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App . 2013) (orig. proceeding). R elator bears the burden of providing the Court with a record sufficient– 2

–

to show he is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Here, however, r elator attached only one document to his petition . That document purportedly show s relator ’ s time served , but it is neither a sworn n or certified copy. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.3(k)(1)(A) (appendix must contain “ a certified

or s wor n copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of

”) , 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with the petition “ a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator ’ s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding ”)

. Relator did not provide, among other things, a record showing he filed the purported motion in the trial court, requested a ruling, or that the trial court has failed or refused to rule on that motion. Accordingly, we conclude relator has failed to meet his burden to provide a rec ord sufficient to support his request for mandamus relief. Even if these defects did not exist, we would deny the petition. While we have jurisdiction to direct the trial court to exercise its discretion by issuing ruling after a reasonable amount of time has passed , we may not tell the trial court how to rule on a pending motion. In re Noble , No. 05

- 23

- 00322

- CV, 2023 WL 2910619, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Apr. 12, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). To the extent relator ’ s petition could be construed as a re quest to compel the trial court to rule, relator must sho w his motion was properly filed, that th e trial court had a legal duty to rule on the motion, was asked to rule on the motion, and failed or– 3

–

refused to do so within a reasonable time. I d. Here, assum ing without deciding that relator ’ s purported motion was properly filed on September 28, 2023, we conclude this proceeding is premature. Accordingly, we deny relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus.

231119f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ / CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.92 Extensions.

An applicant or certificate holder may apply to the appropriate TTB officer deciding the appeal for an extension of any time limit prescribed in this part. The time limit may be extended if TTB agrees the request is reasonable.

[T.D. ATF-406, 64 FR 2129, Jan. 13, 1999, as amended by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
```
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-68196 on Form S-8 dated September 1, 1993, Registration Statement No. 333-63597 on Form S-8 dated September 17, 1998 and Registration Statement No. 333-125672 on Form S-8 dated June 9, 2005 of our report on the consolidated financial statements and report as to schedules included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hickok Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 2006./s/ Meaden & Moore, Ltd.MEADEN & MOORE, Ltd.    Certified Public AccountantsNovember 21, 2006Cleveland, Ohio
```
Summary: Alleged Misuse of Government Charge Cards in the 

BLM’s Wild Horse and Burro Program 

Report Date: July 17, 2020 Report Number: 19-0060 

We investigated an allegation that staff working in the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) 

Wild Horse and Burro Program may have committed fraud by using Government charge cards 

and convenience checks to pay for expenses related to personal horses they owned. 

We found that staff used Government charge cards and convenience checks to make purchases 

related to the use of their privately owned horses for official duties, and that those purchases had 

been approved by their supervisors. 

We also found, however, that staff misapplied the BLM policy that permits the use of privately 

owned horses for official Government activities when they claimed expenses related to those 

personal horses. The BLM subsequently withdrew authorization for staff to use privately owned 

horses in the performance of their official duties in the district where this occurred. 

We also found instances where staff exceeded Government charge card thresholds by splitting 

purchases—which is prohibited—associated with those privately owned horse expenses. In one 

case, we discovered that BLM staff purchased, and supervisors approved, four custom saddles 

for their privately owned horses. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we provided to the BLM Deputy Director for Policy 

and Programs. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC