alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1695. Carriage of matter out of mail on vessels

Whoever carries any letter or packet on board any vessel which carries the mail, otherwise than in such mail, shall, except as otherwise provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than thirty days, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 777; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §308 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §185, 35 Stat. 1124).

The words "thirty days" were substituted for "one month," to make the term of imprisonment more definite and to conform to other comparable sections. (See section 1693 of this title.)

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $50".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study of Private Carriage of Mail; Reports to President and Congress

Congressional findings of need for study and reevaluation of restrictions on private carriage of letters and packets contained in this section and submission by United States Postal Service of reports to President and Congress for modernization of law, regulations, and administrative practices, see section 7 of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note under section 601 of Title 39, Postal Service.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.212 Deposit in receiving tanks.

All recovered denatured alcohol, specially denatured rum, or articles shall be accumulated (after recovery or restoration is completed) in a receiving tank equipped for locking. If the recovered product is to be shipped under § 20.214, it may be accumulated in appropriately marked packages. All denatured alcohol or specially denatured rum recovered shall be measured and a record of the measurement shall be made before being redenatured or reused. Recovered denatured alcohol or specially denatured rum and new denatured alcohol or specially denatured rum shall be kept in separate storage containers properly marked for identification.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0062 )

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adsero Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ William Smith
--------------------------------
Name:  William Smith
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   November 15, 2004

                                       27
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles P. Noyes, Respondent, v. William Sohmer, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. All concurred.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3019613-APR-201109:19 AM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 825

 843

 826

 798

 838

 855

 912

 884

 944

 1,009

 1,054

 1,058

 1,012

 883

 789

 765

 792

 858

 949

 981

 1,065

 1,131

 642

 1,131

 1,094

 1,159

 1,017

 1,124

 1,055

 1,153

 905

 666

 685

 658

 674

 646

 632

 635

 626

 618

 601

 611

 627

 664

 639

 590

 536

 494

 471

 473

 435

 437

 417

 414

 419

 431

 449

 446

 448

 459

 500

 493

 738

 745

 732

 738

 746

 733

 751

 711

 726

 774

 766

 821

 882

 763

 692

 633

 615

 604

 637

 620

 634

 672

 458

 715

 567

 659

 614

 771

 741

 794

 658

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 472

 476

 468

 472

 477

 469

 480

 455

 465

 494

 489

 523

 561

 488

 444

 407

 396

 389

 410

 399

 408

 431

 299

 458

 366

 423

 395

 492

 474

 507

 423

TOTAL 21,710

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

MONASSER OMIAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

FOR PUBLICATION 

February 26, 2015 

v No. 310743 

Michigan Compensation 

Appellate Commission 

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, LC No. 10-000099 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J., and WILDER and STEPHENS, JJ. 

STEPHENS, J. (concurring) 

 I agree with the majority that the MCAC operated under the wrong legal framework, 

DiBenedetto, 461 Mich at 401-402, for failing to address the magistrate’s decision to exclude not 

only the indictment but any witnesses who could testify to the facts which gave rise to that 

indictment. I agree with the dissent that the ability to engage in illegal activity does not equate 

with the ability to earn wages within the meaning of the statute. However, I cannot say that the 

physical and mental efforts required in every illegal activity have no bearing on an individual’s 

ability to earn legal wages or perform work. For example, while passively laundering funds 

would not likely translate into evidence of the ability to engage in legal work, managing those 

laundered funds by arranging for transfers, keeping records of the transactions, and delivering 

the funds to third parties could be relevant to the ability to earn legal income. I agree that the 

argument here is laced with hyperbole, but the record does provide proof that the defendant 

requested and was refused the opportunity to present witnesses to testify to the facts underlying 

the indictment. Whether upon review the MCAC will find that the magistrate’s decision to 

decline to admit such evidence was in error remains to be seen. However, because I cannot 

make a finding as a matter of law that the evidence has no legal relevance I concur that the 

MCAC should review the issue. 

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
#### Frank Paternostro, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 28th day of March, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 26th day of April, 1913, and from said order as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 7th day of May, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The evidence shows that the old system of drainage was continued until the new arrangement was completed *in*1909. The question is whether meantime there was a negligent interruption of it. Of that there is not sufficient evidence. The evidence tends to show that the culvert continued effective. But the plaintiff testified to the free condition of his pipe, that there was water in it, and in the common drain as it met the culvert, but that no water came through to the west side. But he states that he saw the culvert. If the defendant had covered it, he could not have seen its end. He does not state that he saw any indica*912tions that the embankment or material connected with the work had encroached on the outlet of the culvert. The stoppage of the culvert is not traced to any act of the defendant. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of China Changjiang Mining & New Energy Co., Ltd. (“CHJI”), a Nevada corporation previously known as North American Gaming and Entertainment Corporation. CHJI has headquarters and operations in the People's Republic of China and trades in the over-the-counter market under the symbol “CHJI.”

Questions have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of information contained in CHJI's public filings with the Commission concerning, among other things, the company's financial statements for 2009 and 2010. CHJI has failed to disclose that (a) the company filed its last periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 without the required review of the interim financial statements by an independent public accountant; and (b) the company's independent auditor has resigned, withdrawn its audit opinion issued April 16, 2010 relating to the audit of the company's consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009, and informed the company that the financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2010 could no longer be relied upon.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on April 1, 2011 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on April 14, 2011.                

By the Commission.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-8135 Filed 4-1-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCorVu Corporation  (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David C. Carlson, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:  May 15, 2007 |   |                                                   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                   |
|                      |   |                                                   |
|                      |   | /s/ David C. Carlson                                   |
|                      |   |      David C. Carlson         |
|                      |   |      Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 471.64

 470.51

 469.40

 468.23

 467.06

 465.75

 464.47

 463.36

 462.14

 461.12

 459.88

 458.55

 457.28

 456.29

 455.63

 454.85

 454.13

 453.22

 452.40

 451.50

 450.70

 449.85

 449.10

 448.57

 447.99

 447.16

 446.03

 445.03

 444.45

 443.84

 443.26

 1,194,453

 1,182,487

 1,170,771

 1,158,462

 1,146,196

 1,132,511

 1,119,192

 1,107,683

 1,095,078

 1,084,575

 1,071,853

 1,058,261

 1,045,336

 1,035,297

 1,028,622

 1,020,752

 1,013,505

 1,004,371

 996,163

 987,180

 979,218

 970,782

 963,359

 958,125

 952,408

 944,246

 933,173

 923,410

 917,763

 911,837

 906,214

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,946

 4,971

 5,047

 6,164

 5,078

 6,238

 6,116

 4,807

 6,020

 7,440

 4,209

 5,211

 5,213

 5,250

 5,311

 5,345

 5,264

 2,412

 3,637

 4,605

 4,583

 4,920

 3,699

 4,777

 0

 2,401

 3,021

 3,080

 4,533

 4,559

 3,073

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL September 6, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2018 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -300,030 141,930 13,017 -153,125

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-11,791

-11,966

-11,716

-12,309

-12,266

-13,685

-13,319

-11,509

-12,605

-10,503

-12,722

-13,592

-12,925

-10,039

-6,675

-7,870

-7,247

-9,134

-8,208

-8,983

-7,962

-8,436

-7,423

-5,234

-5,717

-8,162

-11,073

-9,763

-5,647

-5,926

-5,623

 430

 450

 419

 402

 399

 411

 435

 420

 431

 438

 428

 432

 427

 401

 347

 399

 417

 416

 416

 417

 436

 402

 390

 402

 397

 425

 423

 421

 381

 400

 605

-5,439

-5,251

-5,390

-6,587

-5,272

-6,533

-6,378

-5,145

-6,311

-7,793

-4,594

-5,467

-5,352

-5,628

-5,672

-5,687

-5,654

-2,692

-4,130

-4,908

-4,984

-5,264

-4,011

-5,199

-488

-2,793

-3,289

-3,353

-5,142

-4,910

-3,809

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 511,311

 506,060

 500,670

 494,083

 488,811

 482,278

 475,900

 470,755

 464,444

 456,651

 452,057

 446,590

 441,238

 435,610

 429,938

 424,251

 418,597

 415,905

 411,775

 406,867

 401,883

 396,619

 392,608

 387,409

 386,921

 384,128

 380,839

 377,486

 372,344

 367,434

 363,625

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 516,750

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Lapin, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

 

 

March 26, 2009

 

/s/ Steven B. Lapin *

 

Steven B. Lapin

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 692.110 How does the Secretary allot funds to the States? ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary allots to each State participating in the GAP Program an amount of the funds available for the GAP Program based on the ratio used to allot the State's Federal LEAP funds under § 692.10(a).
( 2 ) If a State meets the requirements of § 692.113(b) for a fiscal year, the number of students under § 692.10(a) for the State is increased to 125 percent in determining the ratio in paragraph (a) of this section for that fiscal year.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) and (2) of this section— ( i ) If the Federal GAP funds available from the appropriation for a fiscal year are sufficient to allot to each State that participated in the prior year the same amount of Federal GAP funds allotted in the prior fiscal year, but are not sufficient both to allot the same amount of Federal GAP funds allotted in the prior fiscal year to these States and also to allot additional funds to additional States in accordance with the ratio used to allot the States' Federal LEAP funds under § 692.10(a), the Secretary allots— ( A ) To each State that participated in the prior year, the amount the State received in the prior year; and
( B ) To each State that did not participate in the prior year, an amount of Federal GAP funds available to States based on the ratio used to allot the State's Federal LEAP funds under § 692.10(a); and
( ii ) If the Federal GAP funds available from the appropriation for a fiscal year are not sufficient to allot to each State that participated in the prior year at least the amount of Federal GAP funds allotted in the prior fiscal year, the Secretary allots to each State an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of Federal GAP funds available as the amount of Federal GAP funds allotted to each State in the prior fiscal year bears to the amount of Federal GAP funds allotted to all States in the prior fiscal year.
( 4 ) For fiscal year 2011, the prior fiscal year allotment to a State for purposes of paragraph (a)(3) of this section shall include any fiscal year 2010 allotment made to that State under subpart B of this part.
( b ) The Secretary allots funds available for reallotment in a fiscal year in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section used to calculate initial allotments for the fiscal year.
( c ) Any funds made available for the program under this subpart but not expended may be allotted or reallotted for the program under subpart A of this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-3a)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3183

_____________________________

JOHN J. DIGLIO,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

October 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied as the Petitioner 

fails to allege that he made a timely request of counsel to file an 

appeal on his behalf and that counsel failed to do so. See State v. 

Trowell, 739 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1999).

ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

John J. Diglio, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
No. 12,420.

#### Black Forest Realty and Investment Company *v.*Clarke.

Decided November 25, 1929.

*455Messrs. McGarry & Shoup, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Thomas I. Purcell, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court..

The Black Forest Bealty and Investment Company, being at the time engaged in a selling campaign to dispose of its own property, employed James C. Clarke as its “general sales manager,” to have “supervision and control, subject to the board of directors, * * * of all sales of lots owned by” the company, ‘ ‘ and of all salesmen engaged in our 1928 selling campaign.” As compensation for his services, Clarke was to receive a fixed salary of $100 per week plus five per cent of the purchase price on all sales upon which at least 30 per cent of the purchase price shall have been paid. He sued to recover a balance due him for compensation. He recovered judgment for $379.75, which was the total unpaid compensation; that is to say, the balance due on both the fixed salary and the percentage of the purchase price of lots sold.

The company claims that Clarke had no real estate brokers’ license such as chapter 147, S. L. of 1925, requires, and that for this reason he is not entitled to recover the percentage on the price of lots sold.

 Not until the day of the trial was this issue tendered. At that time it was sought to amend the answer so as to present the issue. The court denied the application for leave to amend, and it is said that this ruling was erroneous. We do not agree with counsel’s contention. The statute relied upon has no application to the situation disclosed by the record in this case. Clarke was *456merely an employee of the company, engaged in the company’s business; he was not a broker within the meaning of the statute. The proposed amendment therefore presented. no defense. But, if it were otherwise, the delay in applying for leave to amend would justify the court, in the exercise of its discretion, in denying the application.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice "Whiteord, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.