alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## May 27, 2009

Dear Owner/Resident: A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is todetermine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surfaceof structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) existthat might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

If you have any questions or concerns, pl ease contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045. Sincerely, Steve M Langum As requested, enclosed are the LBP assess ment sheets for 4406 S 33 ST along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint s tabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately b e eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surf aces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Co ntrol Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property . Exposure to lead contamination can advers ely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested.

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 CollegeBlvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-4 58-2900

### Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment LEGEND: H 

# - N 

# - P 

# - 01 

# - 2030 

# I Samples Analyzed I 1 

### I L BVlDNumber 

# i SampleNumlr

- Mater~alP = Palnt I -- S~de of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West 

### 1 - Structure Type H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence XRF 

### Unit: 

# 2. Book: 

### I Date: (6s Time: 

### 4'%tn Staff: Sample Number Lead Loading Structure/Feature (Window, siding, porch, etc.) Substrate Color Deteriorated wood, concrete, etc.) Area

# I111111 11111 IIIIIIIIII IIII

# 1111 2030


# - Plan View 

## - Indicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure Indicate regions of deterioration and describe (Deterioration could include surfaces that are worn due to friction, checking, cracking and flaking, alligatoring, blistering andlor peeling)
-..

~ ~~~ .~. ~~--. ~-~-. ~- 

# - Omaha Lead Site Address: 

### .44063_SL ..-. -. 

### Site Sketch LBP 

### Assessment ALT: Phone: 

## L.. ~orth Arrow 

### c
§ 676.16 Payment of an FSEOG. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section, an institution shall pay in each payment period a portion of an FSEOG awarded for a full academic year.
( 2 ) The institution shall determine the amount paid each payment period by the following fraction: FSEOG ———— N where: FSEOG = the total FSEOG awarded for an academic year and N = the number of payment periods that the institution expects the student will attend in that year.
( 3 ) An institution may pay the student, within each payment period, at such times and in such amounts as it determines best meets the student's needs.
( b ) If a student incurs uneven cost or estimated financial assistance amounts during an academic year and needs additional funds in a particular payment period, the institution may pay FSEOG funds to the student for those uneven costs.
( c ) An institution shall disburse funds to a student or the student's account in accordance with the provisions in § 668.164.
( d ) ( 1 ) The institution shall return to the FSEOG account any funds paid to a student who, before the first day of classes— ( i ) Officially or unofficially withdraws; or
( ii ) Is expelled.
( 2 ) A student who does not begin class attendance is deemed to have withdrawn.
( e ) A correspondence student shall submit his or her first completed lesson before receiving an FSEOG payment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0535) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070b. 1091)
[52 FR 45778, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 49147, Dec. 6, 1988; 57 FR 32357, July 21, 1992; 59 FR 61420, 61421, Nov. 30, 1994; 59 FR 61722, Dec. 1, 1994; 61 FR 60396, Nov. 27, 1996; 61 FR 60608, Nov. 29, 1996; 71 FR 45698, Aug. 9, 2006; 72 FR 62030, Nov. 1, 2007]
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,753 4,261 11,014 13,395 8,451 21,846 0.0 0.0 0.0

2-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,489 4,266 10,754 12,870 8,461 21,331 0.0 0.0 0.0

3-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,289 4,279 10,568 12,474 8,487 20,961 0.0 0.0 0.0

4-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,957 4,287 10,244 11,815 8,504 20,319 0.0 0.0 0.0

5-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,631 4,294 9,925 11,169 8,518 19,687 0.0 0.0 0.0

6-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,404 3,776 9,180 10,718 7,490 18,208 0.0 0.0 0.0

7-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,884 4,282 10,165 11,670 8,493 20,163 0.0 0.0 0.0

8-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 0 0 5,692 4,271 9,963 11,291 8,471 19,762 0.0 0.0 0.0

9-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,684 4,260 9,944 11,274 8,449 19,723 0.0 0.0 0.0

10-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,478 4,253 9,731 10,866 8,436 19,302 0.0 0.0 0.0

11-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,124 4,248 10,372 12,147 8,425 20,572 0.0 0.0 0.0

12-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,921 4,250 10,171 11,745 8,429 20,174 0.0 0.0 0.0

13-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,857 4,244 10,101 11,618 8,417 20,035 0.0 0.0 0.0

14-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,034 4,239 10,273 11,968 8,409 20,377 0.0 0.0 0.0

15-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,127 4,239 10,366 12,153 8,408 20,561 0.0 0.0 0.0

16-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,510 4,241 10,751 12,912 8,413 21,325 0.0 0.0 0.0

17-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,949 4,235 10,184 11,799 8,401 20,200 0.0 0.0 0.0

18-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 6,446 4,239 10,685 12,785 8,408 21,193 0.0 0.0 0.0

19-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,000 4,244 10,244 11,901 8,418 20,319 0.0 0.0 0.0

20-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,998 4,238 10,236 11,897 8,406 20,303 0.0 0.0 0.0

21-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,803 4,240 10,043 11,510 8,411 19,921 0.0 0.0 0.0

22-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,476 4,252 9,728 10,862 8,433 19,295 0.0 0.0 0.0

23-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,309 4,247 9,556 10,530 8,424 18,954 0.0 0.0 0.0

24-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,136 4,244 9,380 10,188 8,418 18,606 0.0 0.0 0.0

25-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,113 4,101 9,214 10,141 8,134 18,275 0.0 0.0 0.0

26-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,901 3,930 8,831 9,721 7,795 17,516 0.0 0.0 0.0

27-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,656 2,759 8,415 11,219 5,472 16,691 0.0 0.0 0.0

28-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 5,811 2,641 8,452 11,526 5,239 16,765 0.0 0.0 0.0

29-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,978 2,842 9,820 13,840 5,637 19,477 0.0 0.0 0.0

30-Sep-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,860 3,485 10,344 13,606 6,912 20,518 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 12 0 12 XXXX 0 0 177,267 121,386 298,653 351,610 240,769 592,379 XXXX 0.0 #VALUE!

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks

Delta Smelt Daily Density

SWP Combined

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

SEPTEMBER 2018

Tracy Combined CVP

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined
484 P.2d 756

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diane GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 634.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 23, 1971.

Chester A. Hunker, Clovis, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, John A. Darden, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant was prosecuted under § 54-7-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp. 1969) for the unlawful sale or delivery of marijuana. This is the general narcotics statute. Defendant contended before the trial court, and asserts here, that the prosecution should have been under § 54-5-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2), which is the special statute. We agree. This issue was decided in State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (Ct.App.1970). Riley has been applied in State v. Thorn (Ct.App.), 82 N.M. 431, 483 P.2d 312, decided March 12, 1971; State v. Rendleman, 82 N.M. 346, 481 P.2d 708 (Ct.App.1971), and State v. McNeece, 82 N.M. 345, 481 P.2d 707 (Ct.App. 1971). The State asserts that State v. Riley, supra, was wrongly decided. We disagree; instead, we reaffirm what was stated in the Riley opinion.

The judgment and sentence is reversed. The cause is remanded with instructions to dismiss the charge against defendant under the general narcotics statute.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and SUTIN, J., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5344 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide support to State 

and local governments in their efforts to counter violent extremist 

threats, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2019 

Mr. AGUILAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide 

support to State and local governments in their efforts 

to counter violent extremist threats, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Radical Ex5 tremist’s Violent Endeavors Now and Tomorrow Act of 

6 2019’’ or the ‘‘PREVENT Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5344 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPPORT TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN 

2 THEIR EFFORTS TO COUNTER VIOLENT EX3 TREMIST THREATS. 

4 Subsection (b) of section 801 of the Homeland Secu5 rity Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 361) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

7 the semicolon at the end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(5) for the purposes of countering violent ex13 tremist threats— 

14 ‘‘(A) provide training from specially 

15 trained clinical social workers, psychologists, re16 ligious leaders, community leaders, and law en17 forcement personnel, to assist local efforts at 

18 securing the homeland; and 

19 ‘‘(B) in coordination with the Federal Bu20 reau of Investigation, provide to State and local 

21 governments specialists, analysts, and agents 

22 trained to counter terrorism and White nation23 alism to assist, in the manner and degree nec24 essary, local efforts at responding to such 

25 threats.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 642.4 How long is a project period?

A project period under the Training program is two years.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11(b))

[75 FR 65771, Oct. 26, 2010]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7576]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Umatilla National Forest, Columbia County Resource Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Umatilla National Forest, Columbia County Resource 
Advisory Committee will meet in Dayton, Washington. The committee is 
meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act, as amended, (Pub. L 110-343) and in compliance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Purpose of the meeting is to 
conduct general business review proposed projects. This meeting is open 
to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 9, 2011, and will begin at 7 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Post Office, 202 South 
Second Street, Dayton, WA. Written comments should be sent to Monte 
Fujishin, Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 
99347. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to [email protected], or 
via facsimile to 509-843-4621.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Pomeroy Ranger 
District, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347. Visitors are 
encouraged to call ahead to 509-843-1891 to facilitate entry into the 
building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monte Fujishin, RAC Designated Federal 
Official, USDA, Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 
West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347; (509) 843-1891; E-mail 
[email protected].
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Idaho, Washington Relay Service at 1-800-377-3529, 24 
hours a day, 365 days a year.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Review of past projects and 
progress of continuing projects. (2) Discussion and selection proposed 
projects for 2012 and if there are participants, (3) Public Comment. 
Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Monte Fujishin,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7576 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```
§ 10.51 Exclusion, in general. ( a ) Exclusion, in whole or in part occurs: ( 1 ) When a practice by an industry member, whether direct, indirect, or through an affiliate, places (or has the potential to place) trade buyer independence at risk by means of a tie or link between the industry member and trade buyer or by any other means of industry member control over the trade buyer, and
( 2 ) Such practice results in the trade buyer purchasing less than it would have of a competitor's product.
( b ) Section 10.52 lists practices that create a tie or link that places trade buyer independence at risk. Section 10.53 is reserved and will list practices not resulting in exclusion. Section 10.54 lists the criteria used for determining whether other practices can put trade buyer independence at risk.
(No. 77-CC-2236

#### Fisher Scientific Co., Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed November 8, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

*745This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Respondent.

Respondent’s motion states as follows:

> “1. That the claim herein seeks the recovery of $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement.

> 2. That prior to the filing of this claim, Claimant filed an identical claim seeking $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to Respondent *(Fisher Scientific Co., 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.__)*

> 3. That a third claim was filed by Claimant subsequent to the claim herein for $8,100.00 for the delivery of four electrometers. *(78-CC-718)*

> 4. That Claimant, in fact, delivered four electrometers to Respondent as alleged in the third complaint. *(78-CC-718)*

> 5. That the claim herein duplicates a portion of the third complaint/7S-CC-718y)

> 6. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 37, Sec. 26, (1977) states that there shall be but one satisfaction of any cause of action.

> 7. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 110, Sec. 48(c), (1977) states that another action pending between the same parties for the same cause is a ground for dismissal.”

Motion for dismissal in this cause is hereby granted and said cause dismissed. All the matters contained herein can be disposed of in Case No. *78-CC-718.*
#### James W. Wadsworth, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of Livingston County and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

May 2014

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-May-14 4 4 n 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 375 2,138 2,513 744 4,240 4,984 5.4 0.9

2-May-14 22 0 y 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 738 1,987 2,724 1,463 3,941 5,404 15.0 0.0

3-May-14 12 0 y 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 837 1,826 2,663 1,661 3,622 5,283 7.2 0.0

4-May-14 4 0 n 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 728 1,234 1,962 1,444 2,447 3,891 2.8 0.0

5-May-14 0 0 n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 432 1,028 1,460 856 2,039 2,895 0.0 0.0

6-May-14 0 0 n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 63 1,003 1,065 124 1,989 2,113 0.0 0.0

7-May-14 0 0 n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 273 1,001 1,274 541 1,985 2,526 0.0 0.0

8-May-14 0 4 n 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 275 996 1,271 546 1,976 2,522 0.0 2.0

9-May-14 0 0 n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 275 999 1,274 546 1,981 2,527 0.0 0.0

10-May-14 0 0 n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 184 999 1,182 364 1,981 2,345 0.0 0.0

11-May-14 0 0 n 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 411 999 1,410 816 1,981 2,797 0.0 0.0

12-May-14 0 0 n 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 122 999 1,120 241 1,981 2,222 0.0 0.0

13-May-14 0 4 n 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 998 998 0 1,980 1,980 0.0 2.0

14-May-14 0 0 n 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,984 1,984 0.0 0.0

15-May-14 0 0 n 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 1,002 1,002 0 1,987 1,987 0.0 0.0

16-May-14 0 0 n 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 326 1,003 1,328 646 1,989 2,635 0.0 0.0

17-May-14 0 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 229 870 1,099 455 1,725 2,180 0.0 0.0

18-May-14 0 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 264 813 1,076 523 1,612 2,135 0.0 0.0

19-May-14 0 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 171 812 983 339 1,610 1,949 0.0 0.0

20-May-14 0 0 n 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 n 280 810 1,090 555 1,607 2,162 0.0 0.0

21-May-14 0 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 423 807 1,230 839 1,601 2,440 0.0 0.0

22-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 203 808 1,011 403 1,603 2,006 0.0 0.0

23-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 125 809 934 248 1,605 1,853 0.0 0.0

24-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 234 810 1,045 465 1,607 2,072 0.0 0.0

25-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 172 810 982 341 1,607 1,948 0.0 0.0

26-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 203 811 1,014 403 1,609 2,012 0.0 0.0

27-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 109 810 920 217 1,607 1,824 0.0 0.0

28-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 188 850 1,037 372 1,685 2,057 0.0 0.0

29-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 156 810 966 310 1,606 1,916 0.0 0.0

30-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 125 810 935 248 1,606 1,854 0.0 0.0

31-May-14 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 170 810 980 338 1,606 1,944 0.0 0.0

Total 42 12 54 XXXX 2 0 2 XXXX 0 0 8,091 31,459 39,550 16,057 62,399 78,447 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

SWP Fish Facility larval sampling not reported to CVO and CVP Tracy Fish Facility larval sampling started 3-13-2014.

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Tracy Combined SWP CVP
SCWC-12-0000583
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. TYRONE SMITH, JR., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000583; CR. NO. 10-1-1569) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, an d Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Saka moto, in place of Pollack, J., recus ed) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Tyrone Smith, Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari filed on November 6, 2014, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, December 11, 2014.
Lars Robert Isaacson /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Donn Fudo for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Karl K. Sakamoto Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000583 11-DEC-2014 09:55 AM
§ 79.10 How does the Secretary make efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70343 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) If a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Department through its single point of contact, the Secretary either: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation;
( 2 ) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the state process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with a written explanation of the decision in such form as the Secretary deems appropriate. The Secretary may also supplement the written explanation by providing the explanation to the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Secretary informs the single point of contact that: ( 1 ) The Department will not implement its decision for at least ten days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) The Secretary has reviewed the decision and determined that, because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification 5 days after the date of mailing of the notification.
(Authority: E.O. 12372, Sec. 2)
#### § 19.119 Change in premises.

If the proprietor intends to extend or curtail any part of the plant premises, except under alternate operations that are covered by §§ 19.142 and 19.143, the proprietor must file form TTB F 5110.41, Registration of Distilled Spirits Plant, to amend the registration. The proprietor must not extend or curtail any premises or equipment before the amended registration is approved.

(26 U.S.C. 5172)