alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5477-N-14]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh                               ( print page 19781)                            Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: March 31, 2011.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2011-8098 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.62

 1,198.59

 1,198.57

 1,198.55

 1,198.58

 1,198.55

 1,198.53

 1,198.53

 1,198.53

 1,198.52

 1,198.51

 1,198.51

 1,198.50

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.45

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.50

 1,198.47

 1,198.60

 1,198.54

 1,198.52

 1,198.49

 1,198.48

 1,198.46

 1,198.44

 48.99

 48.94

 48.90

 48.86

 48.92

 48.86

 48.83

 48.83

 48.83

 48.81

 48.79

 48.79

 48.78

 48.76

 48.72

 48.72

 48.71

 48.71

 48.69

 48.69

 48.76

 48.72

 48.78

 48.72

 48.95

 48.85

 48.81

 48.76

 48.74

 48.71

 48.67

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

+0.05

-0.05

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.07

-0.04

+0.05

-0.05

+0.23

-0.11

-0.04

-0.05

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

CHANGE

314

281

268

246

325

239

227

242

244

226

218

227

210

200

172

191

168

178

161

168

243

173

241

162

434

202

216

179

192

166

147

INFLOW

 337

 303

 282

 260

 292

 260

 240

 240

 240

 230

 220

 220

 210

 201

 182

 182

 173

 173

 164

 164

 201

 182

 210

 182

 314

 250

 230

 201

 191

 173

 155

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 4

 3

 3

 5

 5

 4

 1

 3

 4

 6

 6

 8

 7

 7

 8

 3

 4

 5

 3

 5

 8

 3

 6

 3

 4

 3

 4

 9

 10

 9

C.F.S.

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .09

 .09

 .07

 .02

 .06

 .07

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .13

 .12

 .14

 .06

 .07

 .09

 .06

 .09

 .14

 .06

 .11

 .05

 .07

 .06

 .07

 .15

 .18

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .10

 .35

 .05

 .32

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/13/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.42 6,860 31 6,862 156 2.79 1.29

ACRE-FEET -420 13,607 61 13,611 309

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 13,611

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 13,672

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.29

JULY 1, 2016 23.79

 49.04

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 23.79
### §1696. Private express for letters and packets

(a) Whoever establishes any private express for the conveyance of letters or packets, or in any manner causes or provides for the conveyance of the same by regular trips or at stated periods over any post route which is or may be established by law, or from any city, town, or place to any other city, town, or place, between which the mail is regularly carried, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

This section shall not prohibit any person from receiving and delivering to the nearest post office, postal car, or other authorized depository for mail matter any mail matter properly stamped.

(b) Whoever transmits by private express or other unlawful means, or delivers to any agent thereof, or deposits at any appointed place, for the purpose of being so transmitted any letter or packet, shall be fined under this title.

(c) This chapter shall not prohibit the conveyance or transmission of letters or packets by private hands without compensation, or by special messenger employed for the particular occasion only. Whenever more than twenty-five such letters or packets are conveyed or transmitted by such special messenger, the requirements of section 601 of title 39, shall be observed as to each piece.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 777; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(14), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§304, 306, 309 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§181, 183, 186, 35 Stat. 1123, 1124; June 22, 1934, ch. 716, 48 Stat. 1207).

Section consolidates sections 304, 306, and 309 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Reference to persons causing, procuring, aiding or assisting was omitted as such persons are principals under section 2 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $50".

1970—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "section 601 of title 39" for "section 500 of title 39".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.

#### Study of Private Carriage of Mail; Reports to President and Congress

Congressional findings of need for study and reevaluation of restrictions on private carriage of letters and packets contained in this section and submission by United States Postal Service of reports to President and Congress for modernization of law, regulations, and administrative practices, see section 7 of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note under section 601 of Title 39, Postal Service.
#### Lillian M. Tanner, Respondent, v. Benn Conger and Others, Individually and as Directors of the Groton Bridge and Manufacturing Company, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with the Groton Bridge and Manufacturing Company.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer and answer upon payment of costs in this court and at Special Term. All concurred.
483 P.2d 935

#### In the Matter of the Petition of Sherrill D. Tuft and Thelma Tuft for the Custody of the Minor Children of Sherrill D. Tuft. Sherrill D. TUFT and Thelma A. Tuft, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Barbara TUFT, Cross-Petitioner-Appellee.

No. 9062.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 12, 1971.

B. J. Baggett, Farmington, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

The Juvenile District Court of Sanpete County, Utah, on December 27, 1966, awarded the temporary custody of the minors involved herein to the State Department of Public Welfare of the State of Utah.

Thereafter, on September 10, 1969, and without the consent of the Department of Public Welfare or the Juvenile District Judge, the appellants brought the children to San Juan County, New Mexico, where they filed this suit for their custody. Pending a disposition of appellants’ petition in New Mexico, the Sanpete County District Court conducted a hearing on appellee’s petition for a modification of the custodial order issued by that court. At the Utah hearing the Juvenile District Court award*462ed the. custocjy of the children to the mother, the appellee here.

Armed with the Utah judgment, appellee sought- custody of the children in the San Juan County District Court and-from an order.. dismissing appellant’s petition and awarding the temporary, custody to appellee on the authority of the .Utah judgment, the appellants have appealed.

We see no error in the ruling of the court. We have said in a number of cases that the welfare of the child is the controlling consideration and that we would not líesita'te ’ to exercise our jurisdiction if Warrarited'by changing conditions, even to the point of ' declining to give full faith and credit- to the' judgments of sister statéS.' Smith v. South, 59 N.M. 312, 283 P.2d 1073; Albright v. Albright, 45 N.M. 302, 115 P.2d 59; Evans v. Keller, 35 N.M. 659, 6 P.2d 200; Mylius v. Cargill, 19 N.M. 278, 142 P. 918. This case does not fall within that class. Accordingly, the full faith and credit provisions of the United States Constitution would permit no other conclusion by the New Mexico Court. ' -'United States Constitution, Art. IV, § 1; Mountain States Fixture Company v. Daskalos, 61 N.M. 491, 303 P.2d 698.

But appellant, Sherrill D. Tuft, assei-ts that he was not a party to the Sanpete hearing. His position cannot be sustained by the facts. I-Iis New Mexico attorneys advised 'him 'to enter his appearance in the Utah hearing; his Utah attorney advised him otherwise. Nevertheless, his Utah attorney contacted the Utah Judge and sought a postponement of the hearing. Moreover, appellant was called as a witness • and- testified. Following the Utah decision, finding that appellant appeared personally and by counsel, his Utah attorney filed objections' to the findings and conclusions.

The order dismissing the appellants’ petition should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

McMANUS and STEPHENSON, JJ„ concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,343

 11,563

 13,184

 13,909

 15,325

 16,841

 16,261

 14,719

 14,870

 16,081

 14,446

 14,159

 14,606

 12,819

 11,801

 11,415

 13,195

 13,616

 14,617

 15,265

 13,825

 13,991

 13,384

 12,680

 11,700

 9,965

 7,960

 6,947

 6,173

 6,955

 7,365

 4,543

 4,079

 3,828

 4,212

 5,098

 5,222

 5,093

 4,204

 3,672

 2,997

 3,845

 2,986

 3,552

 3,926

 3,894

 3,334

 3,375

 3,003

 3,302

 4,754

 3,222

 1,855

 1,869

 1,416

 1,584

 1,577

 1,367

 1,131

 1,017

 1,361

 1,342

 8,054

 6,773

 7,434

 7,882

 9,226

 10,029

 10,860

 9,216

 8,675

 9,292

 8,914

 8,132

 8,428

 8,184

 7,556

 7,423

 7,873

 7,820

 8,276

 9,534

 8,464

 7,438

 6,848

 6,499

 5,672

 5,348

 4,429

 3,864

 3,752

 3,590

 3,203

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §2427. Inclusion of offenses relating to child pornography in definition of sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense

In this chapter, the term "sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense" does not require interpersonal physical contact, and includes the production of child pornography, as defined in section 2256(8).

(Added Pub. L. 105–314, title I, §105(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2977; amended Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5102(e), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Pub. L. 118–31 inserted "does not require interpersonal physical contact, and" before "includes".
! 

"#$%&'  ()*+),-,.+

/&(  "#&))

 





	0	
	
1


	
	0$
	0		

	









 !



!
"
#


!
 
!	

		$
%& 
' 


()

$&
*
+,-)'
!#
'

'..$%()


/  
!





$
%0'()$&
*
+,1)2!
	$&
*
+,1)'
!#
3
!


 


 

!



'	
4


4

$
%	()!


	$&
*
+,1)'
!#0'5#6

$%&
()
!
!!
 
 



2!

00	+7883	
	  
!

'!




 /


/''
!!
 
!
 
	

		2&
  

!



'
 
 
 9



 
#
*
#
 
$
%0
#


 
 
()2
&
!
! 
/


0
#
 
 


 '!

 '4
!


:'!4
 #


!

 
!
2!


 
"
 
!
&
!'

 /
 




!'! 
 !


0
#
 
 
2 




8	&	&


	

		 

!  +4

1

;,,2! 

63		8	&	&
 '''

/


0
#
 
 


 '!
!


!#!4
 #


!

 
!


!

/
''/

 

!'
;

	
, ",<=>?@?

	
!0
#A= /
''..0

B


1

'
:!<1-

@1C?-C

@1C?-CD$:)

EC'/,


 
'
'

'..

Case 17-13036-KHK Doc 149 Filed 10/19/18 Entered 10/19/18 17:47:51 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
, F 
 ''
'
!#8

12

, &
F 
  4

 ''
'
!#+4

D2!

1, 8'


  ''

!+4

1;,,

&
!;




'
B'

,B!
!

3
!
 =*
#5!


 * ;

  G G	
,   

	
, ",<=>?@?

	&8+0H8+A=	I....0

B


1

'
:!<1-

0
;@1C?-C

6:;@1C?-CD

';EC'/,


	

	
		







;

  G G5,&
'    

5,&
' ",<=>-D

 
'&


	#'



'
:!<1-

';!
''/E',


 
'0'5#6



  G G	
B,'
   

	
B,'
 ",<=>-

  3
!
 
#

5
 4



'
:!<1-


';$@1)DDC1@-

 
'
3
!
 



0
0
02-33+)4 43 





!

/.
'	'
DC$)$)

#

 
!!


 


! 
!# 
4
!''


 #
 ,

  G G  	
,JJJJJJ

	
, ",

CC

Oct 19 2018 /s/ Klinette Kindred

Entered on Docket: October 19, 2018

Case 17-13036-KHK Doc 149 Filed 10/19/18 Entered 10/19/18 17:47:51 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3

 ;

	
, ",

	
!0#A= /
''..0

B


1

'
:!<1-

5,&
' ",

	#'



'
:!<1-

	
B,'


  3
!
 
#

5
 4



'
:!<1-

5
*,6*
' ",

8


3
!
  



3




'
:!<1-

C1C

Case 17-13036-KHK Doc 149 Filed 10/19/18 Entered 10/19/18 17:47:51 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.183 Disposition of recovered alcohol and material from which alcohol can be recovered. ( a ) *Recovered alcohol.* Manufacturers of nonbeverage products shall not sell or transfer recovered spirits to any other premises without TTB authorization under § 17.3. If recovered spirits are stored pending reuse, storage facilities shall be adequate to protect the revenue. If recovered spirits are destroyed, the record required by § 17.168(c) must be kept. Spirits recovered from intermediate products may be destroyed without notice to TTB. Spirits recovered from nonbeverage products may be destroyed pursuant to a notice filed with the appropriate TTB officer at least 12 days prior to the date of destruction. The notice shall state the reason for the destruction, the intended date of destruction, and the approximate quantity involved. The appropriate TTB officer may impose specific conditions, including requiring that the destruction be witnessed by an appropriate TTB. Unless the manufacturer is otherwise advised by the appropriate TTB officer before the date specified in the notice, the destruction may proceed as planned.
( b ) *By-product material (general).* By-product material from which alcohol can be recovered shall not be sold or transferred unless the alcohol has been removed or an approved substance has been added to prevent recovery of residual alcohol. Material from which alcohol can be recovered may also be destroyed on the manufacturer's premises by a suitable method. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, prior written approval shall be obtained from the appropriate TTB officer as to the adequacy, under this section, of any substance proposed to be added to prevent recovery of alcohol, or of any proposed method of destruction.
( c ) *Spent vanilla beans.* Specific approval from the appropriate TTB officer is not required when spent vanilla beans containing residual alcohol are destroyed on the manufacturer's premises by burning, or when they are removed from those premises after treatment with sufficient kerosene, mineral spirits, rubber hydrocarbon solvent, or gasoline to prevent recovery of residual alcohol.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BARBARA J. LOVE,

Appellant,

v.

RICHARD LOVE,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1230

[August 12, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DR005392.

Ronald K. Lantz, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Deanna V. Shuler, Palm Beach Gardens, and Kathryn M. Beamer, 

North Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §3321. Number of grand jurors; summoning additional jurors

Every grand jury impaneled before any district court shall consist of not less than sixteen nor more than twenty-three persons. If less than sixteen of the persons summoned attend, they shall be placed on the grand jury, and the court shall order the marshal to summon, either immediately or for a day fixed, from the body of the district, and not from the bystanders, a sufficient number of persons to complete the grand jury. Whenever a challenge to a grand juror is allowed, and there are not in attendance other jurors sufficient to complete the grand jury, the court shall make a like order to the marshal to summon a sufficient number of persons for that purpose.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 829.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 419 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §282, 36 Stat. 1165).

The provisions of the first sentence are embodied in rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, but it has been retained because of its relation to the remainder of the text which is not covered by said rule.
§ 19.344 Manufacture of nonbeverage products, intermediate products, or eligible flavors. ( a ) Distilled spirits and wine may be used for the manufacture of flavors or flavoring extracts of a nonbeverage nature as intermediate products to be used exclusively in the manufacture of other distilled spirits products on bonded premises.
( b ) Nonbeverage products on which drawback will be claimed, as provided in 26 U.S.C. 5111-5114, may not be manufactured on bonded premises. Premises used for the manufacture of nonbeverage products on which drawback will be claimed must be separated from bonded premises.
( c ) For purposes of computing an effective tax rate, flavors manufactured on either the bonded or general premises of a distilled spirits plant are not eligible flavors. See § 19.1 for the definition of the term “eligible flavor” and further restrictions that apply to the manufacture of an eligible flavor.
(26 U.S.C. 5201)
#### Gustav H. Poppenberg, Appellant, v. Overland-Buffalo Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.

Augusta Preis, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant.— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5356 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5356

To amend the America COMPETES Act to strengthen reporting requirements 
 relating to deficiencies in Federal research infrastructure, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2019

  Mr. Neguse introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the America COMPETES Act to strengthen reporting requirements 
 relating to deficiencies in Federal research infrastructure, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Labs Modernization Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO FEDERAL RESEARCH 
              INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1007(c)(1) of the America COMPETES Act (42 
U.S.C. 6619(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``and funding for research 
infrastructure'' after ``research infrastructure''.
    (b) GAO Report.--Not later than 180 days and every 2 years 
thereafter, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report 
that includes--
            (1) an assessment of the current state of Federal science 
        facilities and related infrastructure, including with respect 
        to climate control systems, the functionality of equipment and 
        the usage of such equipment, the quality of buildings in which 
        such facilities are housed (including the resiliency of such 
        buildings to changes in climate, weather, and natural 
        surroundings), and the safety of the materials used in 
        construction of facilities;
            (2) an identification of the facilities in most critical 
        need of repair or renovation;
            (3) the estimated costs of completing such repairs or 
        renovations; and
            (4) an evaluation of whether facility occupancy is 
        sufficient to meet agency demands.
                                 <all>
```
### §460zzz. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Conservation Area

The term "Conservation Area" means the Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area established by section 460zzz–1(a)(1) of this title.

#### (2) Council

The term "Council" means the Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Advisory Council established under section 460zzz–6 of this title.

#### (3) Management plan

The term "management plan" means the management plan developed under section 460zzz–5 of this title.

#### (4) Map

The term "Map" means the map entitled "Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area" and dated September 15, 2008.

#### (5) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

#### (6) State

The term "State" means the State of Colorado.

#### (7) Wilderness

The term "Wilderness" means the Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Area designated by section 460zzz–2(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title II, §2401, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1102.)