alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 490.90

 492.39

 493.92

 495.75

 496.93

 497.75

 498.28

 498.93

 499.55

 500.81

 502.02

 503.11

 505.07

 506.35

 507.42

 508.71

 510.04

 511.20

 512.45

 513.77

 514.77

 515.88

 517.15

 518.14

 519.10

 520.07

 521.68

 522.46

 523.69

 524.35

 525.28

 1,404,518

 1,421,239

 1,438,480

 1,459,192

 1,472,601

 1,481,943

 1,487,992

 1,495,423

 1,502,521

 1,516,983

 1,530,916

 1,543,503

 1,566,226

 1,581,127

 1,593,620

 1,608,726

 1,624,352

 1,638,022

 1,652,798

 1,668,450

 1,680,341

 1,693,575

 1,708,759

 1,720,628

 1,732,165

 1,743,849

 1,763,301

 1,772,752

 1,787,690

 1,795,724

 1,807,066

 9,160

 4,024

 3,876

 8,069

 5,986

 9,628

 6,530

 7,910

 7,297

 3,624

 8,062

 6,311

 11,062

 6,286

 6,353

 6,249

 6,281

 6,179

 6,282

 10,501

 3,820

 3,785

 6,047

 5,977

 5,845

 3,699

 9,597

 3,584

 5,517

 3,501

 3,526

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL April 3, 2002

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2002 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 421,434 0 9,043 185,088

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 18,886

 16,721

 17,241

 20,712

 13,409

 9,342

 6,049

 7,431

 7,098

 14,462

 13,933

 12,587

 22,723

 14,901

 12,493

 15,106

 15,626

 13,670

 14,776

 15,652

 11,891

 13,234

 15,184

 11,869

 11,537

 11,684

 19,452

 9,451

 14,938

 8,034

 11,342

 278

 285

 290

 264

 265

 274

 272

 287

 289

 288

 288

 290

 289

 289

 306

 301

 314

 275

 304

 306

 304

 303

 297

 295

 315

 304

 283

 290

 284

 297

 317

8,882

3,732

3,580

7,786

5,721

9,354

6,248

7,617

6,995

3,326

7,771

6,021

10,756

5,990

6,038

5,948

5,967

5,866

5,978

10,195

3,516

3,379

5,722

5,682

5,471

3,388

9,279

3,259

5,208

3,204

3,209

ELEV STORAGE

 194,568

 718,522

 722,254

 725,834

 733,620

 739,341

 748,695

 754,943

 762,560

 769,555

 772,881

 780,652

 786,673

 797,429

 803,419

 809,457

 815,405

 821,372

 827,238

 833,216

 843,411

 846,927

 850,306

 856,028

 861,710

 867,181

 870,569

 879,848

 883,107

 888,315

 891,519

 894,728

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 709,640

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
Order entered August 27, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01099 - CV THERESA BARNETT, Appellant V. DAVID S. CROCKETT, E T AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. 10 - 00136 - F 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 16, 2013 motion for emergency relief from sanctions order and her August 16, 2013 motion for leave of Court to apply Rule 2 and for new panel

. The Court DENIES the motions.

/ s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
(No. 6887

#### Sarah Donelson, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

Kleiman, Cornfield and Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §2494. Progress reports

The President shall include as a part of the annual report required under section 2291h of title 22 an evaluation of progress that each major drug producing country and each major drug-transit country has made during the reporting period in achieving the objectives set forth in section 2492(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title VIII, §804, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title IX, §9001, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–166; amended Pub. L. 106–36, title I, §1001(a)(9), June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 131.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–36 substituted "section 2291h of title 22" for "section 2291(e)(1) of title 22".
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert deRose, Chief Executive Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    ROBERT DEROSE
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Robert deRose          
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. William Capp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ F. William Capp     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| F. William Capp         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| May 10, 2011            |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 540 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 540

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 3, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ``Louise and Bob 
                        Slaughter Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louise and 
Bob Slaughter Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 2, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.22
                                                                   -------------

[LOGO]

                         [LETTERHEAD OF RYERSON TULL]



                                                  November 16, 1999


Mr. George A. Ranney, Jr.
Mayer, Brown & Platt
190 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603


     Re:  Retainer Arrangement
          --------------------

Dear George:

     This will confirm our arrangement under which you have agreed to provide
professional services to Ryerson Tull, Inc. on a retainer basis. We will pay
Mayer, Brown & Platt a retainer fee of $10,000 per month, plus reasonable
expenses, for these services.

     You agree to make yourself personally available, on request, to me, our
General Counsel Joyce Mims, the other members of our senior management team and
our Board of Directors from time to time for advice and counsel on strategic and
other issues.

     Ryerson Tull, Inc. is a regular client of your Firm. We understand,
however, that you will not bill us on an hourly basis for these services. In the
event that any particular project requires a major commitment of your time, then
the Firm and we shall discuss whether your services on that project should be
billed to us in the traditional manner as part of your Firm's regular monthly
statements.

     This retainer arrangement may be terminated by either of us at any time
upon notice to the other.
<PAGE>

Mr. George a Ranney, Jr.
Page 2
November 16, 1999



If this letter correctly sets forth our understanding, please so indicate in the
appropriate space below and return a signed copy hereof to us.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            RYERSON TULL, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Neil S. Novich
                                               -------------------------
                                                Chairman, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and Agreed to:

/s/ George A. Ranney, Jr
------------------------
George A. Ranney, Jr


MAYER, BROWN & PLATT

By: /s/ Debora de Hoyos
   --------------------
    Managing Partner
(No. 6892

#### Medart Division of Jackes-Evans Mfg. Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*7, *1973.*

Medart Division of Jackes-Evans Mfg. Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 5992 Filed 12/18/18 Entered 12/18/18 11:09:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 5992 Filed 12/18/18 Entered 12/18/18 11:09:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### Jasper F. Walker v. Homer J. Allen.

Filed May 3, 1899.

No. 8883.

1. Instructions: Exceptions: Review. An instruction will not be reviewed where no exception was taken thereto at the time, the charge was read to the jury.

S. Review Without Bill 'of Exceptions. Where a bill of exceptions has been quashed, no question can be considered on review a determination of which involves ap examination of the evidence.

*5383. Assignments of Error. An assignment in a petition in error for tlie denial of a motion for a new trial is too indefinite for consideration, wliére such motion contains several different grounds.

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Sinclair, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. F. Walker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Marston & Marston, contra.*

Norval, J.

This suit was to recover the sum of $40 claimed to be due the plaintiff as commissions on the sale of real estate. The petition was answered by a general denial, and a trial in the court below resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, to reverse which is the object of this proceeding.

. The first assignment of error is based upon the giving of the following instruction: “4. You are further instructed that if you find from the evidence that plaintiff had a customer who was willing to buy it on the terms which he was authorized to sell, then the defendant is liable for the agreed commission, notwithstanding the fact that the defendant made the sale himself.” A review of the foregoing instruction is precluded, for the reason no exception was taken thereto by either party in the court below. *(Warrick v. Rounds,*17 Neb. 412; *Nyce v. Shaffer,*20 Neb. 507; *Schroeder v. Rinchard,*25 Neb. 75; *Darner v. Daggett,*35 Neb. 696; *Bouvier v. Stricklett,*40 Neb. 792; *City of Omaha v. McGavock,*47 Neb. 313; *Lowe v. Vaughan,*48 Neb. 651; *Gravely v. State,*45 Neb. 878.)

Complaint is made of the refusal of the court to give two instructions tendered by the plaintiff. These instructions cannot be considered, although proper exceptions were taken at the time they were refused, for the reason the bill of exceptions settled and allowed in the case, on motion of the defendant, has been quashed, In the ab*539sence of a bill of exceptions it is impossible to determine whether the proposed instructions were applicable to the evidence adduced on the trial. *(City Nat. Bank of Hastings v. Thomas,*46 Neb. 861.) For the reason just stated the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict cannot be determined.

The remaining assignment in the petition in error is that “the court erred in overruling a motion for a new trial.” The assignment is too indefinite to present a question for review,- because the motion for a new trial assigns several distinct grounds therefor, and the assignment of error in this court omits to specify to which one of the various points made by the motion the assignment was intended to apply. *(Glaze v. Parcel,*40 Neb. 732; *Wiseman v. Zeigler,*41 Neb. 886; *Wax v. State,*43 Neb. 19; *Moore v. Hubbard,*45 Neb. 612; *Conger v. Dodd,*45 Neb. 36.) The judgment is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2          TECHNOLOGIESGROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE13a —14(b) OR RULE 15d — 14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company./s/ Robert C. Goodwin, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.63 Adoption of formulas and statements of process. ( a ) Adoption of formulas and statements of process is permitted: ( 1 ) When a successor (proprietorship or fiduciary) adopts a predecessor's formulas and statements of process as provided in §§ 20.57(c) and 20.58; and
( 2 ) When a permittee adopts for use at one plant, the formulas previously approved by TTB for use at another plant, or when a permittee adopts a formula previously approved by TTB for a parent or subsidiary, provided that in the case of a parent-subsidiary relationship the subsidiary is wholly-owned by the parent.
( b ) The adoption will be accomplished by the submission of a certificate of adoption. The certificate of adoption shall be submitted to the appropriate TTB officer and shall contain: ( 1 ) A list of all approved formulas or statements of process in which S.D.S. is used or recovered;
( 2 ) The formulas of S.D.S. used or recovered;
( 3 ) The dates of approval of the relevant Forms 1479-A or TTB Forms 5150.19:
( 4 ) The applicable code number(s) for the article or process;
( 5 ) The name of the permittee adopting the formulas, followed by the phrase, for each formula, “Formula of ______ (Name and permit number of permittee who received formula approval) is hereby adopted;” and
( 6 ) In the case of a permittee adopting the formulas of another entity, evidence of its relationship to that entity.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0061) [T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001103718
<NAME>                        ELVA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         97,476
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  98,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,685
<PP&E>                                         72,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                 28,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 635,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          305,384
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     (379,292)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   635,964
<SALES>                                        74,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               74,013
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               347,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,985)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (276,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,188
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (230,648)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.44

 1,198.44

 1,198.43

 1,198.43

 1,198.42

 1,198.42

 1,198.65

 1,198.63

 1,198.57

 1,198.52

 1,198.51

 1,198.50

 1,198.49

 1,198.49

 1,198.49

 1,198.48

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.48

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.44

 1,198.44

 1,198.43

 1,198.43

 1,198.42

 1,198.40

 1,198.41

 48.67

 48.67

 48.65

 48.65

 48.63

 48.63

 49.04

 49.01

 48.90

 48.81

 48.79

 48.78

 48.76

 48.76

 48.76

 48.74

 48.72

 48.71

 48.69

 48.74

 48.72

 48.71

 48.69

 48.67

 48.67

 48.65

 48.65

 48.63

 48.60

 48.62

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.41

-0.04

-0.11

-0.09

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.05

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

+0.02

CHANGE

167

166

149

159

136

152

582

336

232

194

217

206

199

208

206

188

179

170

162

225

180

172

164

156

165

145

156

137

115

149

INFLOW

 155

 155

 147

 147

 138

 138

 371

 348

 282

 230

 220

 210

 201

 201

 201

 191

 182

 173

 164

 191

 182

 173

 164

 155

 155

 147

 147

 138

 122

 130

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 11

 10

 10

 11

 6

 13

 5

 5

 3

 7

 5

 4

 6

 6

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 6

 6

 7

 8

 9

 9

 6

 8

 7

 10

 9

C.F.S.

 .20

 .17

 .18

 .19

 .11

 .22

 .08

 .09

 .05

 .13

 .08

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .07

 .09

 .08

 .09

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .12

 .14

 .15

 .16

 .11

 .14

 .12

 .18

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 1.09

 .06

 .00

 .01

 .12

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/14/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.10 5,772 30 5,558 212 3.71 1.56

ACRE-FEET -100 11,449 60 11,024 421

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 11,024

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 11,084

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.56

JULY 1, 2016 25.35

 48.67

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 25.35
### §1509. Obstruction of court orders

Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime.

(Added Pub. L. 86–449, title I, §101, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 86; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in first par.
#### London Character Shoe Corporation et al. v. Alfred S. Davis, as Treasurer of Retail Shoe Salesmens Union, Local 1115-F, American Federation of Labor, et al., Impleaded with Others.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rubicon Financial Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Mangiapane, Jr., Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Joseph Mangiapane, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer





May 24, 2010
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 21-30247-KLP Doc 30 Filed 04/19/21 Entered 04/19/21 13:44:29 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7