alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division 

In re Case No.

 Chapter 13

 

 Debtor(s). 

ORDER CONDITIONALLY APPROVING LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

A hearing was held in open court on __________________________ on debtor’s motion 

to approve loan modification agreement. Upon consideration of the motion, it is 

ORDERED: 

1. The debtor’s motion to approve the loan modification agreement is 

CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. 

2. A final hearing on debtor’s motion to approve the loan modification agreement 

will be heard on __________________________, at _________ _____, at the U.S. Bankruptcy 

Court, _______________________________________________________________________.

This final hearing may be canceled if, prior to the final hearing, the parties submit to the Court:

(1) a fully executed copy of the loan modification agreement; and (2) a proposed final order on

the motion with endorsements by the debtor or debtor’s counsel if the debtor has been 

represented by counsel during the motion proceedings, the Chapter 13 trustee, and the creditor or 

creditor’s counsel if the creditor has been represented by counsel during the motion proceedings. 

Date: _____________________ ______________________________ 

 Judge 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT ORDER

 ENTERED ON DOCKET

 _________________________

Kandise Nadine Lucas 20-33177-KRH

July 10, 2024

August 21, 2024 12:00 P.M.

Judge Huennekens' Courtroom, 701 East Broad St., Room 5000, Richmond, VA 23219

Jul 10 2024 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Jul 11 2024

Case 20-33177-KRH Doc 132 Filed 07/11/24 Entered 07/11/24 08:55:57 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5170

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2019

     Mr. Carbajal (for himself, Mr. Katko, Mr. Cartwright, and Mr. 
 Fitzpatrick) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Skies Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY 
              AND REST REQUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS TO APPLY 
              TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall modify the 
final rule specified in subsection (b) so that the flightcrew member 
duty and rest requirements under that rule apply to flightcrew members 
in all-cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same manner as 
those requirements apply to flightcrew members in passenger operations 
conducted by air carriers.
    (b) Final Rule Specified.--The final rule specified in this 
subsection is the final rule of the Federal Aviation Administration--
            (1) published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2012 
        (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and
            (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 
        requirements.
    (c) Applicability of Rulemaking Requirements.--The requirements of 
section 553 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the 
modification required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
### [§2332c. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title II, §201(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–871]

Section, added Pub. L. 104–132, title V, §521(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1286, related to use of chemical weapons.
#### § 84.670 Suspension.

*Suspension* means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689. Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
(No. 7048

#### Retta Mae Allen, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 2, 1973.*

Retta Mae Allen, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### In the Matter of Charles Zoufaly against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### Felix Giovinazzi, by Frances Giovinazzi, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present ■—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sarah Serken, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Motion granted. Present—Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### §3205. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–188, title XII, §1201, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2023

Section, Pub. L. 102–182, title II, §207, Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1244, required impact studies and annual reports from the Secretary of Labor.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,164

 1,290

 1,590

 1,779

 1,773

 1,724

 1,730

 1,627

 1,646

 1,558

 1,517

 1,528

 1,537

 1,683

 1,650

 1,644

 1,639

 1,632

 1,552

 1,529

 1,544

 1,513

 1,508

 1,446

 1,472

 1,421

 1,384

 1,362

 1,429

 1,463

 1,539

 957

 1,001

 1,018

 1,091

 1,127

 1,161

 1,164

 1,101

 1,193

 1,185

 1,209

 1,234

 1,257

 1,226

 1,266

 1,235

 1,256

 1,198

 1,121

 1,219

 1,216

 1,213

 1,204

 1,192

 1,215

 1,189

 1,246

 1,239

 1,228

 1,225

 1,202

 1,055

 1,124

 1,272

 1,382

 1,376

 1,402

 1,417

 1,370

 1,375

 1,367

 1,363

 1,375

 1,371

 1,414

 1,416

 1,397

 1,420

 1,401

 1,367

 1,373

 1,374

 1,363

 1,345

 1,332

 1,338

 1,324

 1,319

 1,306

 1,329

 1,355

 1,405

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
#### § 19.38 Approval of required documents.

Except as otherwise provided in this part, the appropriate TTB officer is authorized to approve all documents, bonds, and consents of surety required by this part.

(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5172, 5173, and 5551)
### §1653. Aliens as pirates

Whoever, being a citizen or subject of any foreign state, is found and taken on the sea making war upon the United States, or cruising against the vessels and property thereof, or of the citizens of the same, contrary to the provisions of any treaty existing between the United States and the state of which the offender is a citizen or subject, when by such treaty such acts are declared to be piracy, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §496 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §305, 35 Stat. 1147.)

Minor change was made in phraseology.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

__________________ Division

In re:

DEBTOR NAME(S) Case No.

Debtor.

__________________________________________

ORDER DISCHARGING TRUSTEE AND CLOSING CASE

_________________________________________

It appearing to the Court that __________________________, Trustee, has reduced the

property and effects of the estate to cash; that the Trustee has made distribution thereof and has

rendered a full and complete account thereof, and that said Trustee has performed all other and

further duties required in the administration of said estate; and upon Application of the said

Trustee, and the review by the United States Trustee, and it further appearing to the Court that

nothing further remains to be done in this matter

It is ORDERED that the said estate be and it hereby is closed; that the Trustee be and

hereby is discharged and relieved of the trust.

WILLIAM C. REDDEN

CLERK OF COURT

Date: ____________________ By: __________________________

Deputy Clerk

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT ORDER

ENTERED ON DOCKET:

____________________________

Alexandria

Naveen Prasad Bhatt

20-12637-KHK

Donald F. King

June 17, 2024 /s/Suzan Ramirez-Lowe

June 17, 2024

Case 20-12637-KHK Doc 58 Filed 06/17/24 Entered 06/17/24 13:01:12 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Second Department,

November, 1913.

#### Charles Dusenberry, Jr., and Others, Respondents, *v.*Sagamore Development Company and Others, Appellants.

Appeal by the defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 3d day of October, 1913, granting a preliminary injunction.

Per Curiam :

We do not decide whether the issue of the 175 shares of stock was legal. But four of the plaintiffs hold the overdue mortgage, the bonds will soon mature, and provision must be made for indebtedness. The land is the only recourse, and the 1910 list prices may be prohibitive of sale. The defendants should be allowed to exercise the usual powers in the management of the corporation. It was formed to sell land, and its business is practically suspended by the injunction and there is menace in the indebtedness. A sense of duty and of their responsibility for improvident action presumably will deter the defendants from wasting the corporate property. The order should be modified so far as it restrains the sale of land, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order modified so far as it restrains the sale of land, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.4 Related regulations.

The procedural and substantive requirements relative to the production of denatured alcohol and specially denatured rum are prescribed in part 19 of this chapter, and those relative to the distribution and use of denatured alcohol and specially denatured rum are prescribed in part 20 of this chapter.

[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983, as amended by T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9183 Mar. 6, 1985]
### §3806. Treatment of certain trade agreements for which negotiations have already begun

#### (a) Certain agreements

Notwithstanding the prenegotiation notification and consultation requirement described in section 3804(a) of this title, if an agreement to which section 3803(b) of this title applies—

(1) is entered into under the auspices of the World Trade Organization,

(2) is entered into with Chile,

(3) is entered into with Singapore, or

(4) establishes a Free Trade Area for the Americas,

and results from negotiations that were commenced before August 6, 2002, subsection (b) shall apply.

#### (b) Treatment of agreements

In the case of any agreement to which subsection (a) applies—

(1) the applicability of the trade authorities procedures to implementing bills shall be determined without regard to the requirements of section 3804(a) of this title (relating only to 90 days notice prior to initiating negotiations), and any procedural disapproval resolution under section 3805(b)(1)(B) of this title shall not be in order on the basis of a failure or refusal to comply with the provisions of section 3804(a) of this title; and

(2) the President shall, as soon as feasible after August 6, 2002—

(A) notify the Congress of the negotiations described in subsection (a), the specific United States objectives in the negotiations, and whether the President is seeking a new agreement or changes to an existing agreement; and

(B) before and after submission of the notice, consult regarding the negotiations with the committees referred to in section 3804(a)(2) of this title and the Congressional Oversight Group convened under section 3807 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–210, div. B, title XXI, §2106, Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 1016.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see section 1 of Ex. Ord. No. 13277, Nov. 19, 2002, 67 F.R. 70305, set out as a note under section 3801 of this title.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5388 

To provide that the Secretary of Education may not issue or enforce certain 

rules that weaken the enforcement of the prohibition of sex discrimination 

applicable under title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2019 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, 

and Ms. SPEIER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To provide that the Secretary of Education may not issue 

or enforce certain rules that weaken the enforcement 

of the prohibition of sex discrimination applicable under 

title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REGULATIONS THAT WEAKEN 

4 THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROHIBITION 

5 OF SEX DISCRIMINATION. 

6 The Secretary of Education may not— 

7 (1) take any action to implement, enforce, or 

8 otherwise give effect to the proposed amendments to 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5388 IH

1 regulations relating to the enforcement of title IX of 

2 the Education Amendments of 1972, published on 

3 November 29, 2018, under the heading ‘‘Non-dis4 crimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Pro5 grams or Activities Receiving Federal Financial As6 sistance’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 61462); or 

7 (2) propose or issue any rule or guidance that 

8 is in substantially the same form or substantially the 

9 same as any of such proposed amendments. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 498 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 22), 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To eliminate unused sections of the United States Code, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 498 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Up the Code 

3 Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEALS. 

5 The following provisions of title 18, United States 

6 Code, are repealed: 

7 (1) Section 46 relating to transportation of 

8 water hyacinths. 

9 (2) Section 511A relating to unauthorized ap10 plication of theft prevention decal or device. 

11 (3) Section 707 relating to 4–H club emblem 

12 fraudulently used. 

13 (4) Section 708 relating to Swiss Confederation 

14 coat of arms. 

15 (5) Section 711 relating to ‘‘Smokey Bear’’ 

16 character or name. 

17 (6) Section 711a relating to ‘‘Woodsy Owl’’ 

18 character, name, or slogan. 

19 (7) Section 715 relating to ‘‘The Golden Eagle 

20 Insignia’’. 

21 (8) Chapter 89—Professions and Occupations. 

22 (9) Section 1921 relating to receiving Federal 

23 employees’ compensation after marriage. 

24 SEC. 3. CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 

25 (a) TABLE OF CHAPTERS FOR PART I OF TITLE

26 18.—The table of chapters for part I of title 18, United 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 498 RFS

1 States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to 

2 chapter 89. 

3 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS FOR CHAPTER 3.—The 

4 table of sections for chapter 3 of title 18, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

6 46. 

7 (c) TABLE OF SECTIONS FOR CHAPTER 25.—The 

8 table of sections for chapter 25 of title 18, United States 

9 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

10 511A. 

11 (d) TABLE OF SECTIONS FOR CHAPTER 33.—The 

12 table of sections for chapter 33 of title 18, United States 

13 Code, is amended— 

14 (1) by striking the item relating to section 707; 

15 (2) by striking the item relating to section 708; 

16 (3) by striking the item relating to section 711; 

17 (4) by striking the item relating to section 

18 711a; and 

19 (5) by striking the item relating to section 715. 

20 (e) TABLE OF SECTIONS FOR CHAPTER 93.—The 

21 table of sections for chapter 93 of title 18, United States 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 498 RFS

1 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

2 1921. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 22, 

2019. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
(No. 00109

#### In Re Application of Beverly J. Findlay

*Opinion filed November 14, 1977*

Per Curiam.

This claim, arising out of the death of a policeman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiaries pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter the Act) Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281 *et seq.,*1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at a hearing before the Court on October 12, 1977, the Court finds that:

1. Joliet Police Department Patrolman, William V. Findlay, died on March 20,1976, at St. Joseph Hospital, Joliet, of cancer, after a prolonged illness, at the age of 49.

2. The last day of police duty by Officer Findlay was March 25, 1975.

3. The death certificate submitted by the Claimant recites the immediate cause of death as “respiratory failure, due to or as a consequence of metastasis,” due to or as a consequence of “... cancer of the left lung.”

4. Section 2, subparagraph (e) of the Act provides, *370in relevant part, that “killed in the line of duty” means losing one’s life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer ... if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause.”

5. Patrolman Findlay was not killed in the line of duty as defined in the Act.

It is hereby ordered, by reason of the foregoing, that the claim for benefits by Beverly J. Findlay, pertaining to the death of her husband, William V. Find-lay, be, and the same is hereby denied.
§ 386.3 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to the Rehabilitation Training: Rehabilitation Long-Term Training program: ( a ) The regulations in this part 386.
( b ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 385.
(Authority: Section 302(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 772(a))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 210

 220

 231

 271

 413

 1,055

 518

 1,076

 1,296

 921

 877

 464

 365

 299

 283

 292

 302

 299

 466

 352

 299

 270

 260

 268

 238

 209

 200

 187

 187

 189

 197

 217

 243

 268

 288

 272

 282

 318

 315

 283

 257

 251

 245

 236

 238

 237

 251

 248

 229

 227

 231

 217

 190

 179

 178

 165

 196

 199

 210

 236

 279

 410

 323

 378

 459

 441

 420

 314

 283

 265

 263

 258

 261

 266

 308

 286

 259

 244

 240

 239

 213

 191

 185

 173

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,429

 4,343

 4,242

 4,154

 4,072

 4,063

 3,936

 3,872

 3,949

 4,098

 4,252

 4,306

 4,354

 4,413

 4,480

 4,539

 4,590

 4,620

 4,649

 4,525

 4,461

 4,327

 4,108

 3,906

 3,699

 3,576

 3,478

 3,386

 316

 310

 303

 297

 291

 290

 281

 277

 282

 293

 304

 308

 311

 315

 320

 324

 328

 330

 332

 323

 319

 309

 293

 279

 264

 255

 248

 242

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Harry K. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Eliza Faulkner and Others, Appellants. Ethel M. Terry, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
COOLEY LLP 

Cullen D. Speckhart (VSB 79096)

Olya Antle (VSB 83153)

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700

Washington, DC 20004-2400

Telephone: (202) 842-7800

Facsimile: (202) 842-7899

Counsel to the Plan Administrator

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

NORFOLK DIVISION 

)

In re: ) Chapter 11

)

RETAIL GROUP, INC., et al.,

1

) Case No. 20-33113 (FJS)

)

Reorganized Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered)

)

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF 

MARCH 31, 2022 HEARING AT 11:00 A.M. (ET) 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing scheduled for March 31, 2022, at 11:00 a.m.

(prevailing Eastern Time) is cancelled. All matters previously scheduled to be heard on March 31, 

2022 at 11:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) have either been resolved or are adjourned to the 

hearing scheduled for April 28, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that details regarding the adjournment and 

procedures for remote appearance at the adjourned hearing may be found in the Notice of 

1

 A complete list of each of the Reorganized Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of 

the Reorganized Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at http://cases.primeclerk.com/ascena. The location of 

Reorganized Debtor Mahwah Bergen Retail Group, Inc.’s principal place of business and the Reorganized 

Debtors’ service address in these chapter 11 cases is 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430. 

Case 20-33113-FJS Doc 2641 Filed 03/24/22 Entered 03/24/22 13:52:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Adjournment of Hearing [Docket No. 2640] available at no charge at 

https://cases.primeclerk.com/ascena or for a fee via PACER at http://www.vaeb.uscourts.gov. 

Dated: March 24, 2022

/s/ Olya Antle

COOLEY LLP

Cullen D. Speckhart (VSB 79096) 

Olya Antle (VSB 83153) 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20004-2400 

Telephone: (202) 842-7800 

Facsimile: (202) 842-7899 

Email: cspeckhart@cooley.com 

 oantle@cooley.com 

Counsel to the Plan Administrator

Case 20-33113-FJS Doc 2641 Filed 03/24/22 Entered 03/24/22 13:52:18 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2