alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1103 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LIBERIA 

Signed at Washington October 8, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
LIBERIA 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Washington October 8, 2003; 

 Entered into force November 3, 2003.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 229 ) IV-E-103 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:59PM

Sheet 229of 242P. 2 | Av* UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y l^|^-> ° AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# iv-e-ios

^tPUCfl* - OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

# jumt w JU L

### i 5 199 3 MEMORANDU M f . SUBJECT : Meetin g wit hRepresentative s fro mWalbr o

Automotiv e Corporatio n FROM : Jame s G . Bryson , Mechanica l Enginee r / AI! /

Specia l Regulator yProject s Branc hV/W ^ tt. Ip^jiAy] THRU : Glen nW . Passavant , Chie f S*>^H ^ CO \ o-r^io^rt^*--^

Specia l Regulator yProject s Branc h TO : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 O n1 3 Jul y1993 , member s o f th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) staf f me t wit hrepresentative s o f Walbr o Automotiv e Corporatio n(LarryEngl e an d Joh nHopsteader) . Walbr o Automotiv e Component s i s a supplie r o f automotiv e component s t o automobil e manufacturers . EP Abriefe d th e Walbr o representative s o nth e statu s o f th e onboar d refuelin g vapo r recover yrulemakin g proces s an d provide d severa l publicl yavailabl e document s t o them . Th e Walbr o representative s showe d EP Aa prototyp e componen t whic hwoul d serv e a s a combinatio n mechanica l fillnec k seal , vapo r ven t valv e an d liquid/vapo r discriminator . Thi s prototyp e wa s als o show npublicl ya t th e hearin g hel d b yEP A2 6 an d 2 7 Septembe r 1991 . Th e Walbr o representative s state d tha t thi s mechanica l sea l woul d b e usabl e o nal l light-dut yvehicle s an d trucks . Walbro' s curren t estimat e o f th e cos t t o a manufacture r o f suc ha componen t wa s seve n t o nin e dollar s incrementa l t o a curren t fillneck .
§ 75.740 Protection of and access to student records; student rights in research, experimental programs, and testing. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70334 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Most records on present or past students are subject to the requirements of section 444 of GEPA and its implementing regulations in 34 CFR part 99. (Section 444 is the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.)
( b ) Under most programs administered by the Secretary, research, experimentation, and testing are subject to the requirements of section 445 of GEPA and its implementing regulations at 34 CFR part 98.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1232g, 1232h, and 3474)
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 30340, July 8, 1992; 60 FR 46493, Sept. 6, 1995]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-712 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SINGAPORE 

Signed at Washington July 12, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SINGAPORE 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington July 12, 2005; 

 Entered into force July 12, 2005.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7864]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on April 27, 2011, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss 
project updates and proposals, and information on monitoring efforts 
for the upcoming year.

DATES: Wednesday, April 27 at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 3644 
Avtech Parkway, Redding, California 96002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Designated Federal Official, Donna 
Harmon at (530) 226-2595 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: March 28, 2011.
Arlen P. Cravens,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-7864 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 21-30347-KLP Doc 119 Filed 05/24/23 Entered 05/24/23 07:55:27 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean T. Johnson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

		 

March 29, 2005

/s/ Dean T. Johnson *

Dean T. Johnson

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
§ 668.111 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes rules governing the issuance by the Department of and appeal by an institution or third-party servicer from a final audit determination or a final program review determination arising from an audit or program review of the institution's participation in any Title IV, HEA program or of the servicer's administration of any aspect of an institution's participation in any Title IV, HEA program.
( b ) This subpart applies to any participating institution or third-party servicer that appeals a final audit determination or final program review determination.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to proceedings governed by subpart G of this part or to a determination that— ( 1 ) An institution fails to meet the applicable statutory definition set forth in sections 435, 481, or 1201 of the HEA, except to the extent that such a determination forms the basis of a final audit determination or a final program review determination; or
( 2 ) An institution fails to qualify for certification to participate in the title IV, HEA programs because it does not meet the fiscal and administrative standards set forth in subpart B of this part, except to the extent that such a determination forms the basis of a final audit determination or a program review determination.
[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987, correctly designated at 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 22452, Apr. 29, 1994; 85 FR 54818, Sept. 2, 2020]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,184.71

 1,184.67

 1,184.64

 1,184.59

 1,184.55

 1,184.50

 1,184.46

 1,184.43

 1,184.40

 1,184.37

 1,184.34

 1,184.30

 1,184.33

 1,184.52

 1,184.51

 1,184.51

 1,184.51

 1,184.51

 1,184.50

 1,184.52

 1,184.53

 1,184.55

 1,184.56

 1,184.58

 1,184.60

 1,184.61

 1,184.61

 1,184.60

 1,184.59

 1,184.60

 1,184.61

 27.90

 27.85

 27.82

 27.75

 27.70

 27.64

 27.59

 27.55

 27.52

 27.48

 27.44

 27.39

 27.43

 27.67

 27.65

 27.65

 27.65

 27.65

 27.64

 27.67

 27.68

 27.70

 27.72

 27.74

 27.77

 27.78

 27.78

 27.77

 27.75

 27.77

 27.78

STORAGE

-0.08

-0.05

-0.04

-0.06

-0.05

-0.06

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

+0.04

+0.24

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

+0.03

+0.01

+0.03

+0.01

+0.03

+0.03

+0.01

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

+0.01

+0.01

CHANGE

-11

2

10

-4

-1

-7

2

7

5

6

7

0

23

124

-1

2

6

3

-3

15

11

17

11

18

17

14

10

-1

-1

9

11

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 7

 7

 9

 7

 4

 5

 7

 6

 4

 5

 6

 5

 3

 4

 4

 1

 5

 2

 3

 1

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 6

 9

 5

 4

 2

 3

C.F.S.

 .18

 .18

 .22

 .17

 .10

 .13

 .17

 .16

 .11

 .12

 .15

 .12

 .08

 .11

 .09

 .02

 .12

 .05

 .07

 .02

 .07

 .07

 .09

 .11

 .07

 .16

 .22

 .13

 .11

 .06

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .90

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .16

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/01/2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.19 301 259 0 141 3.53 1.42

ACRE-FEET -190 597 514 0 280

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 514

 514

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.42

JULY 1, 2009 1.45

 27.98
(No. 6228

#### Rouse Brueggeman Lumber Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May*8, *1973.*

Lewis, Blickman, Garrison and Tucker, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Luigi Criscuoli, Respondent, v. Flora Criscuoli, Appellant.

Motion granted on condition that appellant place the case at the foot of the present calendar and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
§ 370.13 What are the requirements for a decision to redesignate? ( a ) If, after complying with the requirements of § 370.11, the Governor decides to redesignate the designated agency, the Governor shall provide to the designated agency a written decision to redesignate that includes the rationale for the redesignation. The Governor shall send the written decision to redesignate to the designated agency by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or other means that provides a record that the designated agency received the Governor's written decision to redesignate.
( b ) If the designated agency submitted to the Governor a timely response to the Governor's notice of proposed redesignation, the Governor shall inform the designated agency that it has at least 15 days from receipt of the Governor's written decision to redesignate to file a formal written appeal with the Secretary.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0520) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 112(c)(1)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 732(c)(1)(B))
#### SEMMLER, Appellant, v. BAIER, et al, Respondents.

(269 N. W. 88.)

(File No. 7941.

Opinion filed October 5, 1936.)

*M. C. Lasell,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Stewart Sharpe,*of D’elmont, for F. W. Baier.

/. *R. Bandy,*of Armour, for Douglas County.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment only. We are convinced that the conclusions of law and judgment are supported -by the facts found by the trial court, and it follows that the judgment appealed from should be, and1 is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.181 Exportation of medicinal preparations and flavoring extracts.

Medicinal preparations and flavoring extracts, approved for drawback under the provisions of this part, may be exported subject to 19 U.S.C. 1313(d), which authorizes export drawback equal to the entire amount of internal revenue tax found to have been paid on the domestic alcohol used in the manufacture of such products. (Note: Export drawback is not allowed for imported alcohol under this provision of customs law.) Claims for such export drawback shall be filed in accordance with the applicable regulations of the U.S. Customs Service. Such claims may cover either the full rate of tax which has been paid on the alcohol, if no nonbeverage drawback has been claimed thereon, or else the remainder of the tax if nonbeverage drawback under 26 U.S.C. 5114 has been or will be claimed.

[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-79, 74 FR 37402, July 28, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,495

 3,269

 3,126

 3,217

 2,963

 2,375

 2,217

 1,891

 2,256

 2,431

 3,120

 2,544

 3,058

 3,065

 3,651

 4,475

 4,895

 4,461

 4,777

 4,365

 3,730

 2,979

 3,791

 4,287

 5,087

 5,211

 5,525

 5,258

 5,368

 4,728

 4,334

 265

 284

 308

 351

 382

 324

 371

 331

 332

 306

 334

 298

 296

 296

 349

 389

 348

 385

 402

 433

 473

 464

 426

 416

 529

 642

 496

 557

 540

 459

 499

 960

 1,029

 1,002

 1,027

 1,036

 919

 886

 785

 687

 742

 797

 710

 756

 959

 1,226

 1,536

 1,570

 1,549

 1,543

 1,550

 1,439

 1,232

 1,215

 1,231

 1,376

 1,444

 1,533

 1,607

 1,675

 1,505

 1,462

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 13,527

 13,384

 13,028

 12,792

 12,608

 12,464

 12,459

 12,457

 12,383

 12,440

 12,523

 12,455

 12,327

 12,295

 12,561

 13,068

 13,636

 14,158

 14,665

 15,296

 15,849

 16,296

 16,824

 17,313

 17,892

 18,626

 19,403

 20,051

 20,500

 20,469

 20,361

 966

 956

 931

 914

 901

 890

 890

 890

 885

 889

 895

 890

 881

 878

 897

 933

 974

 1,011

 1,048

 1,093

 1,132

 1,164

 1,202

 1,237

 1,278

 1,330

 1,386

 1,432

 1,464

 1,462

 1,454

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CorVu Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David C. Carlson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  January 19, 2006

                                    /s/ David C. Carlson
                                    ---------------------------
                                        David C. Carlson
                                        Chief Financial Officer
H:\DATA\PUBLIC\~WATER\~SMITH\FISHDATA\99_00all.wk4 08/08/00 12:35:50 PM

06/01/00

06/06/00

06/11/00

06/16/00

06/21/00

06/26/00

07/01/00

07/06/00

07/11/00

07/16/00

07/21/00

07/26/00

07/31/00

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

Density - DS/Acre foot

0

200

400

Pumping x 100 Acre Foot

Combined Density

SWP Density

CVP Density

14-Day Avg Salvage

SWP Pumping

Total Pumping

Density at Station 918

Delta Smelt Density

2000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 390.61

 390.40

 390.19

 389.82

 389.62

 389.44

 389.17

 388.94

 388.67

 388.41

 388.17

 388.12

 388.00

 387.92

 387.74

 387.57

 387.45

 387.36

 387.34

 387.16

 387.00

 386.80

 386.64

 386.38

 386.22

 386.12

 386.05

 385.93

 385.71

 385.51

 385.35

 320.2

 319.0

 317.7

 315.6

 314.4

 313.3

 311.7

 310.4

 308.8

 307.3

 305.9

 305.6

 304.9

 304.5

 303.4

 302.5

 301.8

 301.3

 301.1

 300.1

 299.2

 298.1

 297.2

 295.7

 294.8

 294.2

 293.8

 293.1

 291.9

 290.8

 289.9

STORAGE

-1.5

-1.3

-1.2

-2.2

-1.2

-1.1

-1.6

-1.3

-1.6

-1.5

-1.4

-0.3

-0.7

-0.5

-1.0

-1.0

-0.7

-0.5

-0.1

-1.0

-0.9

-1.1

-0.9

-1.5

-0.9

-0.6

-0.4

-0.7

-1.2

-1.1

-0.9

CHANGE

2,257

628

558

505

759

751

655

671

639

620

635

947

1,199

889

868

852

1,023

1,033

1,118

985

735

722

854

807

761

1,080

1,149

939

778

726

818

INFLOW

 2,914

 1,160

 1,084

 1,524

 1,278

 1,206

 1,309

 1,239

 1,332

 1,279

 1,260

 1,023

 1,485

 1,052

 1,324

 1,282

 1,312

 1,238

 1,109

 1,438

 1,126

 1,207

 1,237

 1,486

 1,163

 1,313

 1,286

 1,197

 1,331

 1,230

 1,208

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 81

 82

 84

 77

 72

 74

 87

 97

 90

 85

 75

 66

 65

 68

 64

 61

 58

 55

 58

 61

 63

 77

 65

 57

 54

 52

 59

 73

 65

 55

 54

PUMPING

 12

 16

 20

 8

 2

 4

 60

 14

 8

 17

 2

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8

 6

 8

 9

 8

 6

 0

 0

 2

 9

 2

 4

 6

C.F.S.

 .06

 .08

 .10

 .04

 .01

 .02

 .31

 .07

 .04

 .09

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .12

 .85

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .04

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2020 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -31.9 26,961 40,632 2 0 2,134 235 1.20 1.76

ACRE-FEET -31,900 53,477 80,594 4 0 4,233 466

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 321.7

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 80,594

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 4

 4,233

TOTAL 84,831

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 3.72

OUTLET 0 1.76

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 3.72