alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

August 12, 2003 Session

FRANK ROBERT BIGSBY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County

No. F-50657 James K. Clayton, Jr., Judge

No. M2002-02260-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 11, 2003

GARY R. WADE, P.J., dissenting.

I write separately because I believe that in this instance the post-conviction court's failure to

make specific findings of fact does not preclude appellate review. Tennessee Code Annotated

section 40-30-211 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

(b) Upon the final disposition of every petition, the court shall enter a final

order, and except where proceedings for delayed appeal are allowed, shall set forth

in the order or a written memorandum of the case all grounds presented, and shall

state the findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard to each such ground. 

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-211(b). In State v. Swanson, 680 S.W.2d 487, 489 (Tenn. Crim. App.

1984) (citing Brown v. State, 1 Tenn. Crim. App. 462, 445 S.W.2d 669 (1969)), this court

interpreted the predecessor to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-211(b), which was identical

to the current provision, as mandatory. In that case, however, this court observed that "the failure

of the trial judge to abide by the requirement does not always mandate a reversal of the trial court's

judgment." Id. (citing George v. State, 533 S.W.2d 322 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1975); Webb v. State,

4 Tenn. Crim. App. 723, 475 S.W.2d (1971); Brown, 1 Tenn. Crim. App. 462, 445 S.W.2d 669).

Because the purpose of the statute is to facilitate appellate review of the post-conviction court's

decision, a remand is not required when, even though the trial court failed to comply with the rule,

the record is otherwise adequate for review. Id. In Swanson, the record was deemed sufficient to

effectuate appellate review where it contained "the reasons of the trial judge for dismissing

appellant's petition and the transcripts of both the evidentiary hearing held on appellant's

post-conviction petition and the original trial." Id.

In this case, the post-conviction court entered an order denying the petition for postconviction relief but failed to make specific findings of fact regarding the petitioner's claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel. The record contains the transcripts of the evidentiary hearing, the

complete record of the original trial, and the post-conviction court's general finding that the
-2-

petitioner was "properly represented." Implicit in this ruling, in my opinion, is the conclusion that

trial counsel's performance was not deficient. It is my view that, under these circumstances, the

record is adequate for our appellate review of the substantive issue.

___________________________________ 

GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Confirmed Delivery Data Contract Water Year Allocated Supply = 75%

Blue indicates Actual Data Deliveries to or on Behalf of CVC Contractors (Includes Allocated Supply or Acquired Water)

Jan-20

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

(No Losses 

Applies)

3% Loss 

Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Banks 

Pumping

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

O'Neill 

USBR to 

DWR 

Exchanges

O'Neill 

DWR to 

USBR 

Exchanges

Madera ID Recirc 

to Arvin Edison via 

County of Fresno 

CVC Contract 

FD-19-517 & 

SWPAO#18-301 

Up to 2,720 AF 

(as of 11/30/2019) 

Panoche to KernTulare to North 

Kern Bank via CVC 

Contract 

SOD-19-530 & 

SWPAO# 

18-304/307 & 

19-301/302 

Up to 5,000 AF

1/1/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/2/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/3/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/4/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/5/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/6/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/7/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/8/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/9/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/10/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/11/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/12/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/13/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/14/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/15/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/16/2020 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

1/17/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/18/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/19/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/20/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/21/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/22/2020 101 AF 101 AF 101 AF 0 AF

1/23/2020 268 AF 268 AF 101 AF 167 AF

1/24/2020 268 AF 268 AF 101 AF 167 AF

1/25/2020 268 AF 268 AF 101 AF 167 AF

1/26/2020 261 AF 261 AF 91 AF 170 AF

1/27/2020 167 AF 167 AF 0 AF 167 AF

1/28/2020 167 AF 167 AF 0 AF 167 AF

1/29/2020 167 AF 167 AF 0 AF 167 AF

1/30/2020 167 AF 167 AF 0 AF 167 AF

1/31/2020 167 AF 167 AF 0 AF 167 AF

Monthly Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 2,506 AF 2,506 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1,000 AF 1,506 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Running total delivered for each individual transaction= 0 AF 1,000 AF 1,506 AF

Note:

Contract Water Year 2019 (Mar 1, 2019 to Feb 29, 2020 Breakdown of CVC Supply, Article 55 and Transfer In Deliveries +=over pumping

Mar 1, 2019 to 

Jan 31, 2020 CVC Banks Art 55 at Banks

Losses 

Banks to 

O'Neill

CVC at 

Tracy

CVC at 

O'Neill

CVC at Dos 

Amigos

O'Neill 

USBR to 

DWR 

Exchange

O'Neill 

DWR to 

USBR 

Exchange

Kern-Tulare County of Fresno Hills Valley Tri Valley County of Tulare Pixley Lower Tule Total Delivered

Pumping -vsDeliveries 

carried over

Year to Date Contract 

Wtr Yr Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 46,003 AF 46,003 AF 0 AF 33,006 AF 12,194 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 796 AF 45,996 AF 7 AF

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Contractor Deliveries Info\03-2019 to 02-2020\Master 03_2019 to 02_2020 CVC Deliveries New Format.xlsx 12/7/2021 5:59 AM
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

March 24, 2006

Mr. A. Erin Dwyer

Figari & Davenport, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 3400

Dallas, TX 75202-3796

Mr. J. Michael Colpoys

Vial Hamilton Koch & Knox, LLP

1700 Pacific

Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201-4632

Mr. Charles T. Frazier Jr.

Cowles & Thompson, P.C.

901 Main Street, Suite 4000

Dallas, TX 75202-3793

Mr. Deron Lynn Wade

Hartline,  Dacus, Barger

Dreyer & Kern, L.L.P.

6688 N. Central Expwy., Suite 1000

Dallas, TX 75206

Mr. James A. McCorquodale

Vial Hamilton Koch & Knox, L.L.P.

1700 Pacific, Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201-4632

RE:Case Number:  03-0987

Court of Appeals Number:  05-02-01166-CV

Trial Court Number:  00-10332-J

Style:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND RAWSON-KOENIG, INC.

v.

HUDIBURG CHEVROLET, INC., AND HUDIBURG CHEVROLET HOLDING, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion in the above-referenced cause.  (Judgment is forthcoming)

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 03-0987Page 2**
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.111 [Reserved]
### §960. Expedition against friendly nation

Whoever, within the United States, knowingly begins or sets on foot or provides or prepares a means for or furnishes the money for, or takes part in, any military or naval expedition or enterprise to be carried on from thence against the territory or dominion of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States is at peace, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §25 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §13, 35 Stat. 1090; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title V, §8, 40 Stat. 223).

Words "within the United States" were substituted for "within the jurisdiction" etc., in view of the definition of United States in section 5 of this title.

Reference to territory or possessions of the United States was omitted as covered by definitive section 5 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $3,000".
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

September-06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 30 7,146 4,456 11,602 14,174 8,839 23,013 0.0 2-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 7,007 4,426 11,433 13,898 8,779 22,677 0.0 3-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7,239 4,408 11,647 14,359 8,743 23,102 0.0 4-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 23 7,200 4,422 11,622 14,282 8,771 23,053 0.0 5-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 18 6,991 4,375 11,366 13,867 8,677 22,544 0.0 6-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 7,270 4,419 11,689 14,420 8,766 23,186 0.0 7-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 7,096 4,427 11,522 14,074 8,780 22,854 0.0 8-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7,012 4,428 11,440 13,909 8,782 22,691 0.0 9-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7,053 4,409 11,463 13,990 8,746 22,736 0.0 

10-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7,055 4,402 11,457 13,994 8,731 22,725 0.0 11-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7,165 4,392 11,557 14,212 8,712 22,924 0.0 12-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 7,361 4,388 11,749 14,601 8,704 23,305 0.0 13-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7,241 4,413 11,655 14,363 8,754 23,117 0.0 14-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,204 4,433 11,637 14,290 8,792 23,082 0.0 

15-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6,815 4,423 11,238 13,518 8,773 22,291 0.0 16-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,013 4,383 11,397 13,911 8,694 22,605 0.0 17-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 7,070 4,345 11,415 14,024 8,618 22,642 0.0 18-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 6,877 3,822 10,699 13,640 7,581 21,221 0.0 19-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6,982 4,109 11,092 13,849 8,151 22,000 0.0 20-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6,954 4,495 11,448 13,793 8,915 22,708 0.0 21-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6,988 4,404 11,392 13,860 8,736 22,596 0.0 22-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6,975 4,397 11,372 13,834 8,722 22,556 0.0 23-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,125 4,391 11,516 14,133 8,709 22,842 0.0 24-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,004 4,399 11,403 13,893 8,725 22,618 0.0 25-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,066 4,376 11,441 14,015 8,679 22,694 0.0 26-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,072 4,374 11,445 14,027 8,675 22,702 0.0 27-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 7,012 4,419 11,431 13,908 8,765 22,673 0.0 28-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,105 4,378 11,483 14,093 8,684 22,777 0.0 29-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6,958 4,306 11,264 13,802 8,540 22,342 0.0 30-Sep-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,195 4,300 11,495 14,271 8,529 22,800 0.0 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 45 0 45 XXXX 212,253 131,118 343,371 421,004 260,072 681,076 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for September = 100

Delta 

Daily D

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP
#### John M. Gardner and Others, Respondents, v. Ann Kelly, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, Impleaded with John Q. Adams, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### § 19.359 Remnants.

When at the end of a bottling run fewer bottles remain than the number necessary to fill a case, the remaining bottles may be placed in a case marked as a remnant case or kept uncased on the bonded premises until spirits of the same kind are again bottled. The remnant bottles may later be used to complete the filling of a case, or may be used for another lawful purpose such as replacing accidental breakage occurring on bonded premises.

(26 U.S.C. 5201, 5206)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Pearl Richer, Respondent, against Globe Forge & Foundries, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award of death benefits to a widow. The evidence sustains the finding that decedent suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, from which he died. At a hearing the carrier conceded that decedent was found on the premises of the employer with an injury from which he died, and further, " The Referee: In other words, then, you will concede an unwitnessed accident? The Carrier: That is right.” The respondent and decedent were married in 1938 following claimant’s Mexican divorce and resided together as man and wife until he suffered the injury from which he died. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Foster, J., concurs: The decision and award appealed from should be reversed and the claim dismissed upon the ground that there is no evidence to oppose the proof that claimant had not been legally divorced from her surviving husband when she was married to deceased. The presumption as to the validity of her second marriage was overcome by the uncontradicted evidence that neither she nor her first husband ever gained a residence in, and that neither of them was ever physically present within, the jurisdiction of the Republic of Mexico, wherein, while both were residents of this State, they arranged for a so-called " mail order ” divorce.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS

I,F. William Capp, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Beacon Power Corporation;

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|        |   | August 7, 2007          |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | /s/ F. William Capp     |   |
|   |   | F. William Capp         |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: LECLAIRRYAN, PLLC, Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

 Debtor. Chapter 7 

ORDER DISMISSING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

This matter came before the Court upon the Order to Show Cause [ECF No. 1954] (the 

“Order to Show Cause”). The Court conducted a hearing (the “Hearing”) on August 23, 2023, 

where Andrew M. Bowman appeared, individually and by counsel, pursuant to the Order to Show 

Cause. The Court is satisfied by the representations made by Mr. Bowman on the record in open 

court. In consideration whereof, it is 

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause is DISMISSED. 

DATED: 8/24/23 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

 Entered on Docket: 

Copies to:

Robert S. Westermann 

Hirschler Fleischer, PC 

P.O. Box 500 

Richmond, VA 23218-0500 

Andrew M. Bowman 

P.O. Box 40013 

Roanoke, VA 24022 

Paula S. Beran 

Tavenner & Beran, PLC 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Aug. 25, 2023

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1970 Filed 08/25/23 Entered 08/25/23 07:19:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 527

 474

 460

 465

 453

 454

 504

 505

 541

 566

 563

 612

 618

 657

 661

 677

 717

 740

 759

 725

 734

 742

 743

 753

 708

 694

 784

 771

 718

 636

 432

 403

 398

 389

 397

 418

 418

 408

 410

 429

 417

 462

 476

 486

 471

 473

 479

 472

 454

 473

 462

 516

 518

 518

 542

 539

 591

 552

 558

 573

 481

 439

 426

 425

 423

 433

 454

 455

 462

 468

 474

 525

 520

 540

 532

 539

 561

 575

 584

 576

 595

 615

 593

 605

 639

 576

 678

 649

 639

 608

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 313

 287

 279

 279

 277

 284

 297

 297

 302

 305

 309

 340

 337

 350

 345

 349

 363

 371

 377

 372

 384

 396

 382

 390

 411

 372

 435

 417

 411

 392

TOTAL 16,089

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 19.455 Return of spirits withdrawn for export with benefit of drawback. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of §§ 28.197 through 28.199 of this chapter, whole or partial shipments of spirits withdrawn for export with benefit of drawback may be returned to: ( 1 ) The bonded premises of the distilled spirits plant, pursuant to § 19.452; or
( 2 ) To a wholesale liquor dealer or taxpaid storeroom.
( b ) Claims for export drawback filed by proprietors on form TTB F 5110.30 which include the returned spirits shall be reduced by the amount of tax paid or determined on the returned spirits.
(26 U.S.C. 5215)
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Barry D. QuartBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John W. BeckJohn W. Beck, C.P.A.Senior Vice President, Finance and
Operations and Chief Financial Officer (As
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 972

 948

 924

 899

 894

 865

 838

 805

 779

 776

 756

 743

 721

 715

 682

 653

 631

 612

 602

 588

 586

 577

 550

 548

 543

 535

 542

 544

 549

 546

 558

 890

 838

 778

 810

 776

 725

 760

 699

 655

 689

 683

 693

 657

 604

 619

 600

 573

 590

 579

 575

 537

 546

 477

 473

 477

 483

 520

 522

 498

 527

 485

 944

 910

 887

 871

 865

 825

 812

 766

 742

 740

 724

 724

 699

 673

 654

 628

 615

 602

 592

 581

 569

 560

 526

 533

 524

 520

 531

 532

 532

 535

 534

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Confirmed Delivery Data Contract Water Year Allocated Supply = 100%Blue indicates Actual Data Peach Cells indicate Article 55 Actions Deliveries to or on Behalf of CVC Contractors (Includes Allocated Supply or Acquired W

Jun-23

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

(No Losses 

Applies)

3% Loss Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual Banks 

Pumping

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery

AF

O'Neill 

USBR to 

DWR 

Exchanges

O'Neill 

DWR to 

USBR 

Exchanges

Arvin-Edison WSD 

SJRRP Supply via 

CoF CVC Contract 

SWPAO#21-307

6/1/20236/2/20236/3/20236/4/20236/5/20236/6/20236/7/2023 87 AF 87 AF 87 AF

6/8/20236/9/2023

6/10/20236/11/20236/12/20236/13/20236/14/20236/15/20236/16/20236/17/20236/18/20236/19/20236/20/20236/21/20236/22/20236/23/20236/24/20236/25/20236/26/20236/27/20236/28/20236/29/20236/30/2023

Monthly Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 87 AF 87 AF 0 AF 87 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

Running total delivered for each individual action= 3,494 AF

Note:

Contract Water Year 2023 (Mar 1, 2023 to Feb 28, 2024) Breakdown of CVC Supply, Article 55 and Transfer In Deliveries

Mar 1, 2023 to 

Jun 30, 2023 CVC Banks Art 55 at Banks Losses Banks to O'Neill CVC at Tracy CVC at O'Neill CVC at Dos Amigos O'Neill USBR to DWR Exchange O'Neill DWR to USBR Exchange Kern-Tulare County of Fresno Hills Valley Tri Valley County of Tulare Pixley Lower Tule 

Year to Date Contract 

Wtr Yr Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 3,494 AF 3,494 AF 0 AF 0 AF 3,494 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Contractor Deliveries Info\03-2023 to 02-2024\Master 03_2023 to 02_2024 CVC Deliveries New Format