alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.517 Statements required on labels under an exemption from label approval. If a proprietor bottles spirits for domestic use under a certificate of exemption from label approval on form TTB F 5100.31, the following information must appear on the label used on the bottle, in the manner indicated: ( a ) *Brand name.* The brand name on the label must conform to the requirements of § 5.34 of this chapter;
( b ) *Kind.* The class and type of the spirits identified on the label must conform to the requirements of § 5.35 of this chapter;
( c ) *Alcohol content.* The alcohol content on the label must conform to the requirements of § 5.37(a) of this chapter;
( d ) *State of distillation.* In the case of whisky, the state of distillation statement on the label must conform to the requirements of § 5.36(d) of this chapter;
( e ) *Net contents.* The label must show the net contents, unless the statement of net contents is permanently marked on the side, front, or back of the bottle;
( f ) *Name and address of bottler.* The name and address of the bottler must conform to the requirements of § 19.518;
( g ) *Age of whisky containing no neutral spirits.* In the case of whisky containing no neutral spirits, statements of age and percentage by volume on the label must conform to the requirements of § 5.40 of this chapter;
( h ) *Age of whisky containing neutral spirits.* In the case of whisky containing neutral spirits, the label must state the age of the whisky or whiskies and the respective percentage by volume of whisky or whiskies and neutral spirits in accordance with § 5.40 of this chapter;
( i ) *Age of brandy.* In the case of brandy aged for a period of less than two years, the label must state the age.
( j ) *Presence of neutral spirits or coloring, flavoring, or blending material.* The label must indicate the presence of neutral spirits or coloring, flavoring, or blending material in accordance with § 5.39 of this chapter; and
( k ) *Country of origin.* Labels of imported spirits must state the country of origin in substantially the following form: “Product of ____________,” with the blank filled in with the name of the country of origin.
(26 U.S.C. 5201)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank A. Bonomo, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court of Kings County convicting him of robbery, first degree; grand larceny, first degree; and assault, second degree; and sentencing him to imprisonment for a term of fifteen to thirty years. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present— Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
#### Michael Rubenstein, Appellant, v. Alfred A. Mitchell, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
17 

List of FEIS Commenters 

and 

Date Comments Received by BLM 

July 20 Office of the Governor of the State of Wyoming 

August 21 Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) 

September 4 Rock Springs Chamber of Commerce 

September 14 Sweetwater County Board of County Commissioners 

(SWCBCC) 

September 17 Lost Creek ISR, LLC (LCI) 

September 17 Biological Conservation Alliance, Californians for Western 

Wilderness, and Western Watersheds Project (BCA et al.) 

September 17 Wyoming Outdoor Council (WOC)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 8,087 1,700 5,210 71,109 5,079

2 7,180 1,057 4,021 71,918 5,137

3 7,947 1,542 4,054 72,564 5,183

4 8,597 655 4,696 73,432 5,245

5 8,392 1,700 4,674 73,863 5,276

6 7,567 724 3,949 72,967 5,212

7 6,946 473 3,705 71,343 5,096

8 6,093 571 3,356 69,327 4,952

9 6,240 451 3,114 66,707 4,765

10 7,679 451 4,485 65,068 4,648

11 6,516 824 3,543 62,218 4,444

12 3,228 432 1,602 56,940 4,067

13 2,659 290 961 52,441 3,746

14 1,272 251 558 47,928 3,423

15 1,351 271 526 43,244 3,089

16 1,624 285 572 39,795 2,843

17 2,773 294 757 36,498 2,607

18 4,002 345 1,192 32,994 2,357

19 4,734 371 1,376 29,696 2,121

20 5,198 399 1,798 27,545 1,968

21 6,318 475 2,478 26,318 1,880

22 7,234 565 3,084 26,046 1,860

23 7,492 400 3,450 26,382 1,884

24 6,875 460 3,324 25,221 1,802

25 6,876 531 3,219 24,897 1,778

26 7,180 628 3,416 26,711 1,908

27 6,953 868 4,224 29,974 2,141

28 4,835 496 2,899 32,315 2,308

29 5,091 560 2,399 34,188 2,442

30 4,666 414 1,684 35,300 2,521

31 1,864 261 658 35,201 2,514

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Period: December 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2023
### **CHAPTER 601—IMMUNITY OF WITNESSES**

Sec.
6001.
Definitions.
6002.
Immunity generally.
6003.
Court and grand jury proceedings.
6004.
Certain administrative proceedings.
6005.
Congressional proceedings.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330013(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146, added heading for chapter 601.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §201(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 926, added part V and items 6001 to 6005.
§ 51.7 Political parties. Certain activities of political parties are subject to the preclearance requirement of section 5. A change affecting voting effected by a political party is subject to the preclearance requirement: ( a ) If the change relates to a public electoral function of the party and
( b ) If the party is acting under authority explicitly or implicitly granted by a covered jurisdiction or political subunit subject to the preclearance requirement of section 5.
For example, changes with respect to the recruitment of party members, the conduct of political campaigns, and the drafting of party platforms are not subject to the preclearance requirement. Changes with respect to the conduct of primary elections at which party nominees, delegates to party conventions, or party officials are chosen are subject to the preclearance requirement of section 5. Where appropriate the term “jurisdiction” (but not “covered jurisdiction”) includes political parties.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                        Westin Hotels Limited Partnership
                             1111 Westchester Avenue
                             White Plains, NY 10604




March 27, 2002

The Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen) has represented that the audit was subject to
Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to
their audit.



                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ Alan M. Schnaid

                                                Alan M. Schnaid
                                                Vice President
#### Michael J. Drummond, Commissioner of Public Charities of the City of New York, on the Complaint of Dora Simpson, Respondent, *v.*Barnet Zucker, Appellant.

First Department,

July 10, 1913.

Bastardy — evidence insufficient.

Evidence examined, and *held,*insufficient to sustain an order adjudging defendant to be the father of a child about to be born a bastard, and directing him to give a bond to secure the payment of certain sums for the support of the child after its birth, and for the support of the mother during her confinement.

Appeal by the defendant, Barnet Zucker, from an order of filiation entered against him by the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York on the 23d day of January, 1913.

*David Michelsohn,*for the appellant.

*Terence Farley,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from an order adjudging defendant to be the father of a child about to be bom a bastard, directing him to *729pay two dollars and fifty cents a week after the birth of the child for its support, and ten dollars for the support of the mother during her confinement, and to give a bond in the penal sum of two hundred and fifty dollars to secure such payments.

We are of the opinion that the order should be reversed and the appellant discharged. The testimony of the mother of the child about to he born is substantially uncorroborated. It is so contradictory as to render it unworthy of belief, especially when read in the light of her previous history. She is twenty-three years of age, and admits having had two other children, though she has never been married. Appellant’s testimony, on the other hand, is corroborated in many respects by other witnesses, which, taken in connection with the other facts proved as to the situation and relation of the parties at the time of defendant’s alleged misconduct, satisfies us that he is not the father of the child and that the finding to that effect is against the evidence.

The order appealed from, therefore, is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant discharged.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant discharged. Order to be settled on notice.
435 P.2d 1009

#### Lorene ARCHIE and Henry Archie, Petitioners, v. Myrtle Lee SMITH, Respondent.

No. 8552.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 22, 1967.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and NOBLE, MOISE, COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of certio-rari- be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 46 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
### §1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed

Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 753; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §130 (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title X, §1, 40 Stat. 227).

To clarify scope of section and in view of definition of department or agency in section 6 of this title, words "department or agency" were substituted for "executive department, or of any bureau, commission, or office".

Slight verbal changes were also made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 925

 979

 1,143

 1,142

 1,076

 939

 998

 1,206

 1,052

 964

 886

 990

 911

 950

 1,179

 1,200

 1,053

 958

 900

 956

 838

 824

 849

 910

 909

 894

 905

 901

 948

 1,026

 994

 475

 508

 507

 524

 524

 507

 492

 583

 530

 482

 474

 481

 467

 467

 468

 463

 450

 445

 443

 448

 451

 527

 453

 449

 462

 454

 447

 471

 517

 555

 514

 698

 695

 802

 805

 794

 728

 763

 866

 809

 670

 609

 665

 663

 660

 727

 733

 688

 634

 675

 667

 615

 694

 632

 618

 657

 642

 636

 622

 758

 759

 700

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 447

 446

 512

 513

 507

 466

 488

 551

 516

 430

 392

 427

 426

 424

 465

 469

 441

 408

 433

 428

 396

 445

 407

 398

 422

 413

 409

 400

 484

 485

 449

TOTAL 21,684

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### § 97.124 Conditions.

With respect to any research project or any class of research projects the department or agency head of either the conducting or the supporting Federal department or agency may impose additional conditions prior to or at the time of approval when in the judgment of the department or agency head additional conditions are necessary for the protection of human subjects.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 1,224 244 430 4,611 329

2 563 233 300 4,645 332

3 848 220 283 4,704 336

4 1,046 209 285 4,770 341

5 678 206 266 4,839 346

6 667 198 264 4,868 348

7 357 196 236 4,730 338

8 333 184 234 4,595 328

9 513 186 246 4,463 319

10 444 198 243 4,293 307

11 376 202 230 4,114 294

12 334 195 218 3,966 283

13 278 182 204 3,833 274

14 241 178 194 3,633 260

15 220 171 189 3,392 242

16 231 173 192 3,284 235

17 0 0 0 3,001 214

18 0 0 0 2,716 194

19 0 0 0 2,450 175

20 0 0 0 2,186 156

21 0 0 0 1,950 139

22 0 0 0 1,716 123

23 0 0 0 1,470 105

24 0 0 0 1,227 88

25 0 0 0 997 71

26 0 0 0 779 56

27 0 0 0 575 41

28 0 0 0 381 27

29 0 0 0 192 14

30 0 0 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
#### John Lorbach, Appellant, v. Madeira-Mamore Railway Company, Respondent.

We think the complaint sufficiently definite and certain. The matter in the complaint objected to as irrelevant is not sufficiently *924so, if at all, to justify its being stricken out. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, With ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLC v. The Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00906

- CV

Trial co urt case number: 2012

- 35162

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

In an order issued April 1, 2015 , this Court determined that it is appropriate to refer this appeal for resolution by mediation. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 154.02 1, 154.022(a), 154.023. This Cou rt issued a second order on May 14

, 2015, granting the parties’ request for an extension of the deadlines set by this Court’s April 1, 2015 order.

Pursuant to the r evised deadlines set by our May 14, 2015 order, the parties filed a notice to this Court identifying the chosen mediator for this cause. In their notice, the parties requested

additional time to mediate this cause.

This Court GRANTS the parties’ request for additional time. The dea dlines set by the court’s May 14 , 2015 order are amended as follows.

• No later than 15 days from the date that this order is issued, the parties shall file with the Clerk of this Court a completed “Parties’ Notification to Court

of Mediator.” This document can be downloaded from the f orms page of the

Court’s website at http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us

.

• No later than 60 days from the date that this order is issued, the parties

shall conduct the mediation.

• No later than two days from the conclusion of the mediation, the parties and the mediator shall advise the Clerk of this Court in writing whether the parties did or did not settle the underlying dispute, and the mediator shall file with the Clerk of this Court a completed “ Appointment and Fee Report

— Mediation” form. This document can be downloaded from the forms page of the Court’s website at http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us

.

It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael M a ssengale  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 30, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.27 Additional requirements. ( a ) The appropriate TTB officer, to protect the revenue, may require: ( 1 ) Additional information in support of an application for registration;
( 2 ) Marks on major equipment to show serial number, capacity, and use;
( 3 ) Installation of meters, tanks, pipes, or other apparatus; and
( 4 ) Installation of security devices.
( b ) Any proprietor refusing or neglecting to comply with any requirement of this section shall not be permitted to operate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0046) (Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1349, as amended, 1353, as amended, 1395, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5172, 5178, 5552))
[T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

B.R.C. S.r.l. 

Milan, Italy 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously flied open Registration Statements: (a) the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 33-38649); (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-07035); (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-62889); (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-44085); (e) the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-71544); (f) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-82110); (g) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-88690); (h) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-102069); (i) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-102068);(j) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-120029); and (k) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-118689) of our report dated February 25, 2005, except for Note 15 as to which the date is March 31, 2005, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements appearing in the IMPCO Technologies, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    BDO SALA SCELSI FARINA S.P.A. 

 

BDO Sala Scelsi Farina S.p.A. 

Milan, Italy 

November 18, 2005
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5228 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study 

and submit a report on the Federal Government’s ability to hire and 

retain Chinese-language-capable employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2019 

Mr. DESJARLAIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct a study and submit a report on the Federal 

Government’s ability to hire and retain Chinese-language-capable employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON THE FEDERAL GOV4 ERNMENT’S ABILITY TO HIRE AND RETAIN 

5 CHINESE-LANGUAGE-CAPABLE EMPLOYEES. 

6 (a) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 6 months 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 

8 General of the United States shall conduct a study of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5228 IH

1 Federal Government’s ability to hire Chinese-language-ca2 pable employees and submit to Congress a report, which 

3 shall include— 

4 (1) the process for determining Federal posi5 tions that require employees to have Chinese-lan6 guage-capability; 

7 (2) the process for determining whether the em8 ployee possesses Chinese-language-capability; 

9 (3) the process for hiring Chinese-language-ca10 pable employees, including any applicable back11 ground and clearance investigations; 

12 (4) the extent to which Federal agencies are 

13 hiring employees with Chinese-language-capability 

14 for Federal positions that require Chinese-language15 capability; 

16 (5) the effects, if any, on a Federal agency’s 

17 ability to perform its mission in areas requiring em18 ployees with Chinese-language-capability with their 

19 current manpower; and 

20 (6) recommendations, if any, on how to address 

21 identified shortfalls in the hiring and retaining of 

22 Chinese-language-capable employees. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5228 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION.—For the purpose of this Act, the 

2 term ‘‘Chinese-language-capable’’ means the ability to 

3 communicate in any major Chinese dialect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Minna Regierer v. Oscar Passavant, as Executor, etc.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE OF COMMON STOCK



 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 







 CMGI, INC. (the “Corporation”) will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests from its
Secretary the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
	 TEN COM
	 	–	 	as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–	 	 	 	Custodian	 	 
	 TEN ENT
	 	–	 	as tenants by the entireties	 		 	(Cust)	 		 	(Minor)
	 JT TEN
	 	–	 	as joint tenants with right of	 		 		 		 	
		 		 	survivorship and not as tenants in common	 		 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 		 		 		 	Act	 	 	 	 
		 		 		 		 		 	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 For value received, ______________________________________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  

			
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  
	 	
	 	
	 	 	 

  
 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE. 
 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________ 

 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated,___________________ 
  

	
	
	  
	(The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of this Certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.)



  

	
	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
	
	  
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.