alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 441.67

 442.22

 442.76

 443.04

 443.36

 443.64

 444.18

 444.96

 446.25

 446.94

 447.93

 448.80

 449.72

 450.45

 450.74

 451.88

 452.89

 454.01

 454.49

 455.25

 456.00

 456.68

 457.17

 457.29

 457.55

 457.74

 457.73

 457.74

 457.95

 458.23

 458.59

 890,861

 896,162

 901,377

 904,085

 907,183

 909,897

 915,139

 922,728

 935,325

 942,087

 951,817

 960,395

 969,494

 976,734

 979,616

 990,970

 1,001,065

 1,012,299

 1,017,127

 1,024,786

 1,032,363

 1,039,248

 1,044,219

 1,045,438

 1,048,080

 1,050,012

 1,049,910

 1,050,012

 1,052,148

 1,055,000

 1,058,669

 2,492

 5,662

 5,679

 2,877

 2,500

 2,101

 3,557

 3,528

 8,358

 5,578

 5,224

 4,174

 3,978

 1,376

 1,763

 5,442

 2,758

 2,770

 2,763

 8,283

 2,774

 2,744

 5,080

 1,349

 2,762

 2,057

 0

 348

 1,021

 698

 2,063

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL July 5, 2016

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2016 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 170,214 0 1,439 99,110

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 2,406

 5,301

 5,215

 2,708

 3,098

 2,714

 5,242

 7,589

 12,597

 6,762

 9,730

 8,578

 9,099

 7,240

 2,882

 11,354

 10,095

 11,234

 4,828

 7,659

 7,577

 6,885

 4,971

 1,219

 2,642

 1,932

-102

 102

 2,136

 2,852

 3,669

 99

 99

 99

 99

 96

 93

 73

 49

 53

 54

 50

 48

 50

 53

 51

 55

 38

 22

 31

 34

 33

 33

 17

 18

 8

 3

 2

 2

 0

 0

 77

2,411

5,458

5,436

2,774

2,733

2,162

3,658

3,374

8,141

5,561

5,148

4,015

4,088

1,595

1,557

5,355

2,518

2,504

2,628

8,037

2,578

2,511

4,971

1,207

2,661

2,019

-47

240

1,525

278

2,014

ELEV STORAGE

 101,759

 314,188

 319,646

 325,082

 327,856

 330,589

 332,751

 336,409

 339,783

 347,924

 353,485

 358,633

 362,648

 366,736

 368,331

 369,888

 375,243

 377,761

 380,265

 382,893

 390,930

 393,508

 396,019

 400,990

 402,197

 404,858

 406,877

 406,830

 407,070

 408,595

 408,873

 410,887

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 311,777

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
§ 19.409 General. A proprietor may withdraw from customs custody spirits imported or brought into the United States in bulk containers for transfer of those spirits without payment of tax to the bonded premises of the proprietor's distilled spirits plant. The proprietor may receive these spirits either in bulk containers or by pipeline. Spirits received on bonded premises under this section may be: ( a ) Withdrawn for any purpose authorized by chapter 51 of the IRC in the same manner as domestic spirits; or
( b ) Redistilled or denatured only at 185° or more of proof. For the requirements regarding transfers of bulk spirits from customs custody to the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant, see subpart L of part 27 of this chapter.
(26 U.S.C. 5232)
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 0506 Directorate ID: 2010
- SW
- 020
-AD Article : L’Hotellier Portable Halon 1211 Fire Extinguishers Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,000 Helicopters in the US Registry. Reason : to prevent using contaminated gas that may reduce fire suppression and release toxic fumes that would endanger the safety of the helicopter and its occupants. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 212 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work

-hour) $ 85 Othe r (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 297 Total US Fleet Cost $ 297,000, assuming the fire extinguishers are replaced on the estimated fleet. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: J. R. Holton, Jr.
§ 99.60 What functions has the Secretary delegated to the Office and to the Office of Administrative Law Judges? ( a ) For the purposes of this subpart, *Office* means the Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Education.
( b ) The Secretary designates the Office to: ( 1 ) Investigate, process, and review complaints and violations under the Act and this part; and
( 2 ) Provide technical assistance to ensure compliance with the Act and this part.
( c ) The Secretary designates the Office of Administrative Law Judges to act as the Review Board required under the Act to enforce the Act with respect to all applicable programs. The term *applicable program* is defined in section 400 of the General Education Provisions Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g (f) and (g), 1234)
[53 FR 11943, Apr. 11, 1988, as amended at 58 FR 3189, Jan. 7, 1993; 82 FR 6253, Jan. 19, 2017]
#### George A. Curtis, Appellant, v. Clinton W. Meade et al., Respondents. Leroy Jones, Appellant, v. Clinton Meade, Respondent.

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. All concur, except McCurn, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for defendants in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
No. 15,964.

#### Shelton, doing business as Jack Shelton Realty Company *v.*Clymer et al.

(192 P. [2d] 448)

Decided April 12, 1948.

Mr. Theodore J. Adams, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Paul A. Ruston, for defendants in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,203

 2,272

 1,286

 1,888

 3,646

 2,368

 3,150

 3,442

 3,509

 3,556

 3,330

 2,731

 2,218

 1,483

 1,811

 958

 712

 1,207

 1,306

 547

 2,336

 2,285

 3,239

 4,579

 4,129

 3,800

 3,108

 2,244

 2,172

 1,974

 1,608

 256

 267

 221

 211

 228

 231

 216

 285

 299

 309

 420

 313

 234

 264

 282

 231

 212

 204

 207

 207

 235

 294

 329

 392

 381

 274

 262

 286

 419

 383

 319

 697

 588

 463

 429

 664

 655

 664

 839

 958

 933

 947

 794

 639

 528

 499

 384

 328

 336

 355

 245

 475

 570

 978

 1,251

 1,163

 1,041

 844

 765

 764

 712

 627

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,715

 6,051

 6,294

 6,529

 7,001

 7,460

 7,854

 8,336

 8,864

 9,301

 9,703

 9,919

 9,907

 9,798

 9,600

 9,396

 9,261

 9,168

 8,859

 8,449

 8,260

 7,991

 8,011

 8,329

 8,545

 8,792

 8,997

 9,234

 9,499

 9,827

 10,126

 408

 432

 450

 466

 500

 533

 561

 595

 633

 664

 693

 709

 708

 700

 686

 671

 662

 655

 633

 604

 590

 571

 572

 595

 610

 628

 643

 660

 679

 702

 723

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.101 Appeals concerning use of the term “organic.”

To appeal a determination that an organic claim on a label does not comply with the National Organic Program rules in 7 CFR part 205, contact the Program Manager, National Organic Program (NOP), Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture. See the NOP appeal process in 7 CFR 205.680.

[T.D. ATF-483, 67 FR 62859, Oct. 8, 2002]
### §4084. Articles exempt from relief

The President may not provide import relief under this part with respect to any article if—

(1) import relief previously has been provided under this part with respect to that article; or

(2) the article is subject to import relief under—

(A) part A; or

(B) chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 109–53, title III, §324, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 494.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates note below.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Part A, referred to in par. (2)(A), was in the original "subtitle A", meaning subtitle A (§§311–316) of title III of Pub. L. 109–53, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 488, which enacted part A of this subchapter and amended section 2252 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in par. (2)(B), is Pub. L. 93–618, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1978. Chapter 1 of title II of the Act is classified generally to part 1 (§2251 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 2101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Section effective on the date the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 1, 2006) and to cease to have effect on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, and, during any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA–DR country, to cease to have effect with respect to such country, see section 107 of Pub. L. 109–53, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.
9800 Fredericksburg Road

San Antonio, Texas 78288

 

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE May 13, 2015

Washington, DC 20590

Reference: Amendment to United Services Automobile Association’s Exemption No. 11274 and 

11309 in Regulatory Dockets FAA-2014-0796 and FAA-2014-0964 to include additional UAS 

(Unmanned Aircraft Systems).

Dear Sir or Madam,

United Services Automobile Association (USAA) was issued two exemptions, no. 11274 and 

11309 (hereinafter referred to as the exemptions) for operation in the national airspace. USAA, 

hereby requests an amendment to the exemptions to allow additional Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems (UAS) with no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and 

safety that were the basis for the FAA granting the original exemptions.

USAA wishes to operate the following additional UAS: 

 Aerialtronics Zenith with integrated Airware system (already approved by the FAA in 

prior exemption no. 11188)

 3DR Iris+ (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11490)

 DJI Phantom 2 Vision (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11479)

 DJI Inspire 1 (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11153A)

 DJI S900 (already approved by the FAA in prior exemption no. 11471)

 3DR Spektre (already approved by FAA in prior exemption no. 11206)

 3DR Solo

 DJI Phantom 3

 E-Flite Apprentice (for training purposes only) 

 Drone Deploy system on our exemption no. 11274 and 11309 approved PrecisionHawk 

Lancaster UAS

under the same terms and conditions contained in the previously granted exemptions. Attached 

and submitted as confidential documents in a separate e-mail, are the flight operation manuals 

for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the 

terms of the exemptions. 

As this is an amendment to existing exemptions requesting only the addition of other types of 

UAS, USAA respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be 

published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 
9800 Fredericksburg Road

San Antonio, Texas 78288

 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for an 

amendment to the exemptions.

Sincerely,

Kat Swain

Kathleen “Kat” Swain

Innovation Advisor

CFI, MEI, AGI

USAA
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 273 224 242 166

2 277 229 250 171

3 260 234 246 168

4 268 240 252 172

5 258 239 246 168

6 256 237 245 167

7 260 236 247 169

8 286 240 257 175

9 321 247 273 185

10 322 248 264 179

11 340 252 280 189

12 348 248 291 196

13 363 249 277 187

14 360 252 289 195

15 364 257 296 199

16 356 259 290 195

17 327 262 281 190

18 0 0 0 16

19 350 250 291 196

20 355 246 288 194

21 373 250 300 201

22 372 248 296 199

23 374 251 299 201

24 376 253 301 202

25 396 253 300 201

26 395 256 295 198

27 400 249 296 199

28 404 250 308 206

29 398 250 301 202

30 388 247 303 203

Total 8104

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 590

 584

 579

 572

 571

 563

 561

 555

 561

 546

 536

 532

 528

 525

 522

 516

 515

 511

 511

 512

 502

 498

 493

 485

 474

 472

 469

 467

 468

 467

 468

 566

 559

 544

 545

 549

 535

 535

 535

 538

 502

 481

 470

 497

 496

 465

 481

 471

 489

 483

 475

 477

 477

 459

 460

 421

 420

 439

 443

 436

 422

 421

 581

 575

 568

 564

 560

 555

 552

 549

 547

 529

 512

 512

 513

 507

 500

 503

 499

 502

 504

 499

 493

 490

 482

 474

 462

 450

 456

 458

 454

 448

 447

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.62 Third-party comment on certificates.

When a third party (such as foreign government, another Federal agency, a State agency, an industry association, a competitor of a certificate holder, a consumer or consumer group, or any other interested person) wishes to comment on an approved certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle approval, such comments should be submitted in writing to the appropriate TTB officer who will review the subject of the comment. If the comment raises an issue that is outside the scope of TTB's statutory or regulatory authority, or the appropriate TTB officer determines that the certificate is in compliance with applicable law and regulations, the commenter will be informed that no further action will be taken. If the appropriate TTB officer determines that the commenter has raised a valid issue that TTB has authority to address, he or she will initiate appropriate action. The appropriate TTB officer may, in his or her discretion, notify the commenter as to the action being taken by TTB with respect to the certificate.

[T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
Exhibit 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Prestige Capital Corp, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel D. Drummond, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Daniel D. Drummond Daniel D. Drummond Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Date: April 15, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133505 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133505 

 COA: 275486 

Genesee CC: 05-015704-FH 

BRENT WILLIAM KALFS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his 

dissenting statement in People v Wright, 474 Mich 1138 (2006). 

s0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
(No. 74-CC-0751

#### Minnie Booker, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed April 17, 1978.*

Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion filed by Respondent to dismiss.and objections filed by Claimant to said motion.

Claimant filed a suit based upon personal injuries received as a result of a fall on the sidewalk in front of a Department of Labor employment office. Claimant alleges that Respondent failed to remove ice and snow from the sidewalk in front of the Department of Labor employment office and to properly maintain a signboard in front of said office, which signboard had fallen over onto the sidewalk and, as a result, Claimant suffered injuries.

Motion to dismiss is based upon the grounds that “neither a municipality nor adjacent property owners are liable for injuries resulting from the natural accumulation of snow and ice.” *Levy v. State of Illinois, 22 Ill.Ct.Cl. 694, 697,*citing *Riccitelli v. Sternfield, 1 Ill. 2d 133.*

Respondent further sets forth that the signboard in question belongs to the U.S. Marine Corps, that it was placed there by them to advertise recruitment, that it was entirely under the control of the U.S. Marine Corps, and that suit should have been brought against the U.S. Marine Corps and not the State of Illinois.

*529Motion to dismiss is hereby granted and said cause dismissed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1011 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MALTA 

Signed at Washington October 3, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MALTA 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Washington October 3, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 11, 2011.
#### § 35.5 Investigation of claims.

When a claim is received, the Department will make such investigation as may be necessary or appropriate for a determination of the validity of the claim.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 340

 347

 338

 339

 331

 320

 312

 261

 239

 229

 224

 214

 290

 302

 307

 289

 312

 311

 354

 353

 343

 330

 342

 318

 270

 308

 322

 338

 341

 306

 303

 294

 302

 279

 235

 208

 202

 176

 164

 155

 150

 153

 166

 172

 189

 196

 204

 216

 224

 218

 202

 187

 191

 216

 213

 211

 218

 239

 237

 239

 251

 259

 305

 311

 298

 266

 239

 230

 207

 183

 173

 168

 171

 179

 209

 228

 237

 237

 247

 255

 271

 260

 235

 235

 259

 246

 236

 253

 269

 281

 280

 277

 273

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 204

 208

 200

 180

 164

 158

 144

 129

 123

 120

 122

 127

 145

 157

 162

 162

 169

 174

 183

 177

 161

 161

 176

 168

 162

 172

 182

 190

 189

 187

 185

TOTAL 7,518

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,534

 4,060

 4,371

 4,095

 4,878

 3,698

 4,308

 4,684

 3,969

 3,905

 4,142

 5,063

 4,282

 3,311

 2,866

 2,033

 2,196

 1,769

 1,373

 1,163

 935

 709

 523

 520

 873

 1,295

 1,148

 1,604

 2,659

 3,385

 290

 319

 400

 492

 359

 408

 490

 471

 467

 460

 463

 449

 466

 483

 485

 437

 414

 387

 338

 339

 313

 298

 279

 294

 301

 308

 305

 323

 349

 382

 816

 1,193

 1,357

 1,159

 1,329

 1,249

 1,559

 1,838

 1,236

 1,168

 1,164

 1,365

 1,260

 885

 818

 635

 622

 580

 477

 456

 423

 389

 342

 330

 371

 432

 429

 539

 790

 899

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 15, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 9,090

 9,709

 10,477

 10,916

 11,663

 12,477

 13,526

 14,760

 15,165

 15,646

 15,944

 16,705

 17,370

 17,578

 17,580

 17,022

 16,287

 15,708

 14,856

 14,063

 12,927

 11,478

 10,584

 9,746

 8,953

 8,020

 7,189

 6,843

 6,815

 7,079

 649

 694

 748

 780

 833

 891

 966

 1,054

 1,083

 1,118

 1,139

 1,193

 1,241

 1,256

 1,256

 1,216

 1,163

 1,122

 1,061

 1,005

 923

 820

 756

 696

 640

 573

 514

 489

 487

 506

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### Drawbacks