alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                             FORM 10-K/A

(Mark One)

X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.

  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
    For the transition period from          to        .

Commission File Number 1-9157

          SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                Connecticut                    06-1157778
     (State or other jurisdiction of        (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)         Identification Number)

         227 Church Street, New Haven, CT           06510
     (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

                            (203) 771-5200
                     (Registrant's telephone number,
                          including area code)


<PAGE>

           SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
        Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K for the Period Ended 12/31/97

                           Exhibit Index
                          _______________

  Exhibits identified in parentheses below, on file with the SEC, are
  incorporated by reference as exhibits hereto.

 Exhibit 
 Number

  99a      Annual Report on Form 11-K for the SNET Management Retirement
           Savings Plan for the plan year ended December 31, 1997 (filed
           as Exhibit 99a to Form SE dated June 18, 1998, File No. 1-9157).

  99b      Annual Report on Form 11-K for the SNET Bargaining Unit Retirement
           Savings Plan for the plan year ended December 31, 1997 (filed
           as Exhibit 99b to Form SE dated June 18, 1998, File No. 1-9157).
  

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be
  signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                      SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                                         (Registrant)


                               By: /s/ Donald R. Shassian
                                       Donald R. Shassian
                        Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  Date: June 19, 1998
### Part A—Relief From Injury Caused by Import Competition

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 116–113, title V, §502(a), (d), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 70, struck out "[reserved]" at end of part heading and reenacted part heading without change.
because the federal court deemed them unexhausted did not demonstrate 

good cause. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 

(2003); Colley v. State, 105 Nev. 235, 236, 773 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1989). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

C ht 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge 

Carlos Otero 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SABANES ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, L. Mychal jefferson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-k of Atec
Communications Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstancesw under which such statemets were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial infomation included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for
the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and i are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as define in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
registrant and have:

A0 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be disigned under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consoildated subsidiaires, is made to us
by others within those entities, paticularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evalution; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 4, 2003

/s/ L. Mychal Jefferson

L. Mychal Jefferson

Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133286 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133286 COA: 274839 Kalamazoo CC: 04-001619-FC FLOYD LEE BRASHERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
12/2/2021

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily 

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acr

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jun-21 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 N 0 801 801 0 

2-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 800 800 0 

3-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 799 799 0 

4-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 189 798 987 374 

5-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 92 801 892 182 

6-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 798 936 273 

7-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 282 804 1,086 560 

8-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 800 984 364 

9-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 799 983 364 

10-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 625 413 1,039 1,240 

11-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 750 1,488 

12-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 750 1,488 

13-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 750 1,488 

14-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 750 1,488 

15-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 750 1,488 

16-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 749 0 749 1,485 

17-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 487 487 0 

18-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 536 536 0 

19-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 801 0 

20-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 806 806 0 

21-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808 808 0 

22-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 808 808 0 

23-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 809 809 0 

24-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 809 809 0 

25-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 809 809 0 

26-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 810 810 0 

27-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 811 811 0 

28-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 810 810 0 

29-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 806 806 0 

30-Jun-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 805 805 0 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 6,192 18,326 24,518 12,282 3

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage. Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.Larval smelt sampling efforts ceased on June 1, 2021.

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

JUNE 2021

Tra

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
#### § 682.214 [Reserved]
### §285. Taking or using papers relating to claims

Whoever, without authority, takes and carries away from the place where it was filed, deposited, or kept by authority of the United States, any certificate, affidavit, deposition, statement of facts, power of attorney, receipt, voucher, assignment, or other document, record, file, or paper prepared, fitted, or intended to be used or presented to procure the payment of money from or by the United States or any officer, employee, or agent thereof, or the allowance or payment of the whole or any part of any claim, account, or demand against the United States, whether the same has or has not already been so used or presented, and whether such claim, account, or demand, or any part thereof has or has not already been allowed or paid; or

Whoever presents, uses, or attempts to use any such document, record, file, or paper so taken and carried away, to procure the payment of any money from or by the United States, or any officer, employee, or agent thereof, or the allowance or payment of the whole or any part of any claim, account, or demand against the United States—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 698; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §92 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §40, 35 Stat. 1096).

Word "employee" was inserted after "officer" in two places to clarify scope of section.

The words "five years" were substituted for "ten years" in the punishment provision to conform to like provisions in similar offenses. (See section 1001 of this title.)

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 01-1780 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. ALFRED SHARPTON, Defendant, Appellant.
No. 01-1781 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. ADOLFO CARRIÓN, Defendant, Appellant.
No. 01-1782 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. ROBERTO RAMÍREZ, Defendant, Appellant.No. 01-1783 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. JOSÉ RIVERA, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this court, issued June 14, 2001, should be amended as follows:

On page 9, footnote 6, delete the first paragraph and insert the following paragraph in its place:

"The appellants further object that the district court acted plainly unreasonably by ignoring differences between their offense conduct and the offense conduct of defendants in the proceedings of the prior day. Those defendants were arrested in the live impact area of the base, and their protests, appellants say, were therefore more disruptive. We do not find the uniform treatment to be plainly unreasonable. The point is that the district court's stated objective was to put an end to protesters' taking the law into their own hands. There is nothing plainly unreasonable about that objective. And that objective does not require distinguishing among defendants according to the particular manner in which they took the law into their own hands."
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 24 - 00072 - CV ROEL GUERRA , A

PPELLANT V. MARIA FABIOLA GUERRA , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 229th District Court

Starr County, Texas Trial Court No . DC - 23 - 226 , Honorable Baldemar Garza , Presiding



### March 4 , 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH , JJ. Appellant , Roel Guerra , appeals from the trial court ’s Order Granting Motion to Compel Trust Accounting and Order Awarding Attorney’s Fees
. 1 Now p ending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to abate the appeal so that the parties can mediate their dispute. The parties are scheduled to mediate on March 12, 2024. To expedite the disposition of this appeal and in the interest of conservation o f judicial resources, we grant

1 Originally appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2

the motion, abate the appeal , and stay all further proceedings. T he cause will be removed from this Cour t’ s active docket and treated as a suspended case. All appellate deadlines are hereby suspended until further order of th e Court. T he parties are directed to file a status report of their settlement negotiations with the Clerk of this Court within sixty days of this order
. Should the parties reach a settlement agreement within sixty days and seek to dismiss this appeal, Appellant shall file a motion to dismiss in compliance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 (a) and (d). It is so ordered. Per Curiam
Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC

Summary: Government Contractor Sentenced to 57 Months in 

Prison for $3.7 Million Procurement Fraud Scheme

Report Date: May 1, 2020 Report Number: 15-0497

The OIG investigated a procurement fraud scheme by Federal contractor Chester L. Neal, Jr., 

who created numerous companies to win Government contracts, subcontracted the work out to 

local vendors, and then failed to pay his subcontractors. Neal allegedly misrepresented himself as 

a Government official to subcontractors and mailed documents to further his scheme. 

We substantiated that from July 2008 to December 2017, Neal used aliases to create several

companies to bid on and win over 105 Government contracts from the U.S. Department of the 

Interior and other Federal agencies. We found that Neal defrauded 48 subcontractors across the 

United States of over $3.7 million and made several misrepresentations in order to induce the 

victim vendors to perform the contractually required work.

We also substantiated that Neal sent fictitious trade references and credit applications to lull 

them into performing work or providing lines of credit to perform on the various Government 

contracts.

Neal confessed to perpetrating the scheme to defraud subcontractors and mailing documents to 

his subcontractors to further the scheme.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California prosecuted this case. On August 

19, 2019, Neal pled guilty to one count of mail fraud. He was sentenced to 57 months in prison

and 36 months of supervised probation upon release and ordered to pay $3,734, 927.50 in 

restitution. In addition, Neal was debarred from participating in Federal procurement and 

nonprocurement programs until 2031, and 11 companies affiliated with him were debarred from 

participating in Federal procurement and nonprocurement programs until various dates.

This is a summary of an investigative report that we provided to the Office of Acquisition and 

Property Management.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   399
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                         251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       399
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

August 30, 2010

LOGO

David Cathcart

Chief Financial Officer

TRX, Inc.

2970 Clairmont Road

Suite 300

Atlanta, GA 30329



|Re: | Amendment 3 to Second Letter of Amendment
|--- | -----------------------------------------

Dear
David:

The purpose of this letter is to amend the Second Letter of Amendment dated December 23, 2009 as amended on June 7, 2010 and
July 30, 2010. Effective August 30, 2010, Expedia and TRX now agree to amend the Second Letter of Amendment as follows:

Section 3 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

3) Renewal of Pricing and Exclusivity for 2011. The pricing and exclusivity terms set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 of this Second Letter of Amendment will automatically be extended
for calendar year 2011 unless either Party gives the other Party written notice of non-renewal of such terms on or before October 1, 2010. If such notice is given, Section 1 and Section 2 will cease to apply, effective
December 31, 2010, and the pricing terms under the Agreement (and associated SOWs) that were in place prior to this Second Letter of Amendment will apply in calendar year 2011.

Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below and returning a signed copy to me as soon as possible. If you do not agree with any of the foregoing, please
contact me as soon as possible so that we can determine how best to proceed.



Yours truly,Expedia, Inc./s/ Dominique BourgaultDominique BourgaultVice President, Finance  Partner Services Group




|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                        
|TRX, Inc.               
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ David D. Cathcart  
|Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

|             |  |               
|------------ |  | --------------
|Date Signed: |  | 31 August 2010
§ 19.647 Authorized operations. After approval of an application by TTB, a plant qualified for the production of vinegar may only: ( a ) Produce vinegar by the vaporizing process; and
( b ) Produce distilled spirits of 30° of proof or less for use in the manufacture of vinegar on the vinegar plant premises.
(26 U.S.C. 5501)
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Suzanne Long, Senior VP & C.F.O., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Integrity Bancshares, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
23

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.May 15, 2006       /s/ Suzanne Long Suzanne Long, Senior VP & C.F.O.    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
24
#### § 75.618 Charges for use of equipment or supplies.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70333, Aug. 29, 2024.

A grantee may not charge students or school personnel for the ordinary use of equipment or supplies purchased with grant funds.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)