alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 511.50

 511.87

 512.21

 512.60

 512.82

 513.03

 513.38

 513.62

 514.01

 514.29

 514.59

 514.74

 515.19

 515.60

 515.88

 516.21

 516.46

 516.66

 516.86

 517.05

 517.34

 517.63

 517.90

 518.30

 518.56

 518.89

 518.89

 519.13

 519.35

 519.35

 519.40

 1,641,564

 1,645,936

 1,649,957

 1,654,574

 1,657,180

 1,659,669

 1,663,820

 1,666,669

 1,671,301

 1,674,630

 1,678,199

 1,679,984

 1,685,344

 1,690,233

 1,693,575

 1,697,516

 1,700,503

 1,702,895

 1,705,288

 1,707,562

 1,711,035

 1,714,510

 1,717,748

 1,722,549

 1,725,672

 1,729,639

 1,729,639

 1,732,526

 1,735,174

 1,735,174

 1,735,776

 1,793

 602

 2,115

 3,840

 946

 0

 3,765

 1,253

 1,252

 1,253

 1,263

 1,570

 2,217

 5,361

 2,803

 3,299

 2,519

 1,905

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,841

 0

 310

 911

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 22, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2018 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 97,754 0 1,945 64,292

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 3,542

 4,372

 4,021

 4,617

 2,606

 2,489

 4,151

 2,849

 4,632

 3,329

 3,569

 1,785

 5,360

 4,889

 3,342

 3,941

 2,987

 2,392

 2,393

 2,274

 3,473

 3,475

 3,238

 4,801

 3,123

 3,967

 0

 2,887

 2,648

 0

 602

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 52

 81

 206

 226

 233

 223

 219

 217

 228

 257

1,757

331

2,122

3,547

941

19

3,427

1,664

6,087

6,001

3,116

5,135

4,489

8,440

3,682

3,121

2,274

1,825

-153

-211

-177

-197

-319

-251

-463

-507

-123

1,297

2,837

4,041

540

ELEV STORAGE

 40,818

 910,964

 911,295

 913,417

 916,964

 917,905

 917,924

 921,351

 923,015

 929,102

 935,103

 938,219

 943,354

 947,843

 956,283

 959,965

 963,086

 965,360

 967,185

 967,032

 966,821

 966,644

 966,447

 966,128

 965,877

 965,414

 964,907

 964,784

 966,081

 968,918

 972,959

 973,499

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 909,207

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4,500

5,000

2,000

3,710

2,500

3,500

1,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3,200

4,000

0

29,410
§ 19.665 Alternate methods or procedures. ( a ) *General.* The appropriate TTB officer may approve the use of an alternate method or procedure that varies from the regulatory requirements in this subpart or from any regulatory requirements in subparts A through W of this part that have been incorporated by reference in this subpart. The appropriate TTB officer may approve the use of an alternate method or procedure only if the proprietor shows good cause for its use and the alternate method or procedure: ( 1 ) Is not contrary to law;
( 2 ) Will not have the effect of merely waiving an existing regulatory requirement;
( 3 ) Is consistent with the purpose and effect of the method or procedure prescribed in this subpart;
( 4 ) Provides equal security to the revenue; and
( 5 ) Will not cause an increase in cost to the Government and will not hinder TTB's administration of this subpart.
( b ) *Exceptions.* TTB will not authorize the use of an alternate method or procedure relating to the giving of any bond, or to the assessment, payment, or collection of tax.
( c ) *Prior approvals.* Alternate methods or procedures in effect prior to April 18, 2011, which are not contrary to the regulations in this part, are preserved until renewed unless revoked by operation of law due to the enactment of law that is contrary to the alternate method or procedure.
(26 U.S.C. 5181)
#### § 16.10 Meaning of terms.

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires, terms shall have the meaning ascribed in this section.

*Act.* The Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act of 1988.

*Alcoholic beverage.* Includes any beverage in liquid form which contains not less than one-half of one percent (.5%) of alcohol by volume and is intended for human consumption.

*Bottle.* To fill a container with an alcoholic beverage and to seal such container.

*Bottler.* A person who bottles an alcoholic beverage.

*Brand label.* The label carrying, in the usual distinctive design, the brand name of the alcoholic beverage.

*Container.* The innermost sealed container, irrespective of the material from which made, in which an alcoholic beverage is placed by the bottler and in which such beverage is offered for sale to members of the general public.

*Health.* Includes, but is not limited to, the prevention of accidents.

*Person.* Any individual, partnership, joint-stock company, business trust, association, corporation, or any other business or legal entity, including a receiver, trustee, or liquidating agent, and also includes any State, any State agency, or any officer or employee thereof.

*Sale and distribution.* Includes sampling or any other distribution not for sale.

*State.* Includes any political subdivision of any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, the Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, or Johnston Island.

*State law.* Includes State statutes, regulations and principles and rules having the force of law.

*TTB.* The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC.

*United States.* The several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, the Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, and Johnston Island.

*Use of other terms.* Any other term defined in the Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act and used in this part shall have the same meaning as assigned to it by the Act.

[T.D. ATF-294, 55 FR 5421, Feb. 14, 1990, as amended by T.D. ATF-425, 65 FR 11892, Mar. 7, 2000; T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16925, Apr. 4, 2006]
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00769-CV

Ronald Dwayne WALKER,

Appellant

v.

Ben G. MARIN,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 372125

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 25, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant, Ronald Dwayne Walker, appealed the trial court’s judgment in Cause Number 

372125. Appellant’s brief was originally due December 23, 2011. We granted appellant an 

extension until January 23, 2012 to file his brief. Because appellant failed to file his brief we 

ordered appellant to file, on or before March 16, 2012, his appellant’s brief and a written 

response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. We advised appellant that if he

failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal 
04-11-00769-CV

- 2 -

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (court may 

dismiss appeal because appellant has failed to comply with a court order within the time 

provided). Appellant has not filed a brief or the written response ordered by the court.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed. We further order that appellee recover his costs 

in this appeal from appellant.

PER CURIAM
§ 463.715 How are one-stop infrastructure costs funded in the local funding mechanism? ( a ) In the local funding mechanism, the Local WDB, chief elected officials, and one-stop partners agree to amounts and methods of calculating amounts each partner will contribute for one-stop infrastructure funding, include the infrastructure funding terms in the MOU, and sign the MOU. The local funding mechanism must meet all of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The infrastructure costs are funded through cash and fairly evaluated non-cash and third-party in-kind partner contributions and include any funding from philanthropic organizations or other private entities, or through other alternative financing options, to provide a stable and equitable funding stream for ongoing one-stop delivery system operations;
( 2 ) Contributions must be negotiated between one-stop partners, chief elected officials, and the Local WDB and the amount to be contributed must be included in the MOU;
( 3 ) The one-stop partner program's proportionate share of funding must be calculated in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200 based upon a reasonable cost allocation methodology whereby infrastructure costs are charged to each partner in proportion to its use of the one-stop center, relative to benefits received. Such costs must also be allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable;
( 4 ) Partner shares must be periodically reviewed and reconciled against actual costs incurred, and adjusted to ensure that actual costs charged to any one-stop partners are proportionate to the use of the one-stop center and relative to the benefit received by the one-stop partners and their respective programs or activities.
( b ) In developing the section of the MOU on one-stop infrastructure funding described in § 463.755, the Local WDB and chief elected officials will: ( 1 ) Ensure that the one-stop partners adhere to the guidance identified in § 463.705 on one-stop delivery system infrastructure costs.
( 2 ) Work with one-stop partners to achieve consensus and informally mediate any possible conflicts or disagreements among one-stop partners.
( 3 ) Provide technical assistance to new one-stop partners and local grant recipients to ensure that those entities are informed and knowledgeable of the elements contained in the MOU and the one-stop infrastructure costs arrangement.
( c ) The MOU may include an interim infrastructure funding agreement, including as much detail as the Local WDB has negotiated with one-stop partners, if all other parts of the MOU have been negotiated, in order to allow the partner programs to operate in the one-stop centers. The interim infrastructure funding agreement must be finalized within 6 months of when the MOU is signed. If the interim infrastructure funding agreement is not finalized within that timeframe, the Local WDB must notify the Governor, as described in § 463.725.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,174.03

 1,173.64

 1,173.24

 1,172.84

 1,172.44

 1,172.03

 1,171.63

 1,171.23

 1,170.85

 1,170.48

 1,170.11

 1,169.76

 1,169.41

 1,168.89

 1,168.29

 1,167.70

 1,167.09

 1,166.49

 1,165.87

 1,165.25

 1,164.60

 1,163.95

 1,163.85

 1,163.81

 1,163.76

 1,163.70

 1,163.65

 1,163.60

 1,163.55

 1,163.51

 1,163.47

 16.48

 16.13

 15.79

 15.45

 15.11

 14.77

 14.44

 14.12

 13.82

 13.53

 13.25

 12.98

 12.72

 12.34

 11.90

 11.49

 11.07

 10.66

 10.26

 9.86

 9.46

 9.06

 9.00

 8.98

 8.95

 8.91

 8.88

 8.85

 8.82

 8.80

 8.78

STORAGE

-0.34

-0.34

-0.35

-0.34

-0.34

-0.34

-0.33

-0.32

-0.30

-0.29

-0.29

-0.27

-0.26

-0.38

-0.43

-0.42

-0.42

-0.40

-0.41

-0.40

-0.40

-0.39

-0.06

-0.02

-0.03

-0.04

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

CHANGE

4

-1

-2

0

3

1

7

7

-7

0

71

1

4

5

-11

-3

-5

4

2

5

2

7

1

9

6

4

5

7

7

10

9

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 165

 140

 140

 140

 130

 130

 190

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 25

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

OUTLET

 10

 7

 8

 7

 8

 7

 7

 4

 5

 6

 5

 5

 6

 8

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 5

 6

 6

 6

 5

 5

 6

 4

 6

 6

 6

 5

C.F.S.

 .35

 .23

 .27

 .26

 .28

 .27

 .25

 .16

 .20

 .23

 .19

 .20

 .25

 .32

 .32

 .29

 .30

 .31

 .33

 .25

 .30

 .29

 .29

 .24

 .27

 .29

 .20

 .29

 .33

 .31

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/11/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -8.04 152 3,943 0 194 8.33 .00

ACRE-FEET -8,040 301 7,821 0 385

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 7,821

 7,821

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2013 .00

 16.82
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,322

 1,296

 1,274

 1,281

 1,296

 1,313

 1,302

 1,318

 1,363

 1,386

 1,392

 1,507

 1,518

 1,481

 1,419

 1,349

 1,328

 1,304

 1,304

 1,314

 1,325

 1,319

 1,312

 1,313

 1,308

 1,285

 1,233

 1,214

 1,246

 1,262

 1,022

 1,011

 1,042

 1,063

 1,071

 1,059

 1,077

 1,091

 1,106

 1,099

 1,094

 1,123

 1,101

 1,097

 1,098

 1,102

 1,098

 1,099

 1,118

 1,120

 1,114

 1,103

 1,048

 1,074

 1,079

 1,028

 1,022

 996

 1,033

 991

 1,152

 1,143

 1,158

 1,176

 1,180

 1,183

 1,179

 1,189

 1,215

 1,216

 1,229

 1,272

 1,261

 1,232

 1,223

 1,214

 1,208

 1,200

 1,205

 1,201

 1,199

 1,193

 1,186

 1,190

 1,175

 1,149

 1,118

 1,122

 1,135

 1,104

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
|   | 1. | The Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       | /s/ Xiaojing Yu               |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
|  Date: March 29, 2011 | Xiaojing Yu                   |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                       |                          |
|                       | /s/ Jiayin Zhu                |
|  Date: March 29, 2011 | Jiayin Zhu                    |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                       | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer



I, Jay M. Gratz, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ryerson Inc. (the Company), state
and certify that this Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form
10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|/s/ Jay M. Gratz                                                                                            
|Jay M. Gratz Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) March 30, 2006
Exhibit No. 32.1




                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Service Attendants,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Roger
E. Pawson,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



January 14, 2005                           By: /s/Roger E. Pawson
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Roger E. Pawson
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer



------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Martha T. Brown, Appellant, v. Arbogast & Bastian Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Remington Typewriter Company. (2 cases.)

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinions. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARK BESANCENEY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent

______________________

2022-1271

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. PH-1221-19-0255-M-1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JOHN THOMAS HARRINGTON, The Employment Law 

Group, PC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also 

represented by ROBERT SCOTT OSWALD. 

 JANA MOSES, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, 

DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by REGINALD 

THOMAS BLADES, JR., BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M.

MCCARTHY. 

 EMILEE COLLIER, Investigation and Prosecution 

Case: 22-1271 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 07/12/2023
Division, United States Office of Special Counsel, for amicus curiae Office of Special Counsel, Washington, DC. Also 

represented by LIZ BROWN, KAREN GORMAN, HENRY J.

KERNER.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and 

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

July 12, 2023 

Date

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Acting Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1271 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 07/12/2023
### §§132, 133. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §304(a), (b), 42 Stat. 936, related to marking imported articles and packages to indicate country of origin and penalty for violation of same.

Corresponding provisions of Tariff Act of 1930, see section 1304 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective sixty days after enactment of repealing act.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 480

 488

 481

 505

 468

 454

 419

 387

 380

 372

 365

 382

 369

 368

 372

 389

 416

 408

 376

 358

 368

 358

 367

 388

 404

 376

 397

 402

 393

 392

 457

 460

 462

 464

 357

 365

 360

 349

 340

 338

 333

 335

 350

 355

 357

 350

 351

 355

 353

 347

 350

 328

 332

 356

 333

 331

 353

 376

 343

 341

 467

 472

 470

 482

 413

 396

 392

 373

 362

 363

 355

 368

 364

 362

 366

 365

 376

 376

 366

 352

 359

 348

 346

 365

 356

 357

 376

 393

 371

 364

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 305

 308

 306

 314

 271

 261

 258

 247

 240

 240

 235

 243

 241

 240

 242

 242

 248

 248

 242

 234

 238

 231

 230

 242

 236

 237

 248

 259

 245

 241

TOTAL 11,475

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §1967. Evidence

In any proceeding ancillary to or in any civil action instituted by the United States under this chapter the proceedings may be open or closed to the public at the discretion of the court after consideration of the rights of affected persons.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, §901(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 944.)