alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w9



 





Exhibit 10.9




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

SUNCOM WIRELESS HOLDINGS, INC.

DIRECTORS’ STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN

AS AMENDED AND RESTATED




     WHEREAS, the SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. Directors’ Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended
and restated (the “Stock Plan”) contains provisions allowing participants to elect to defer
the receipt of their shares of restricted stock subject to and in accordance with the terms of the
SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) pursuant to a unanimous written consent executed on December 29, 2006 (the
“Written Consent”) terminated the NQDC Plan effective as of December 31, 2006;



     WHEREAS, the Written Consent authorized officers of the Company to take all necessary or
appropriate actions to implement and carry out the resolutions set forth in the Written Consent;
and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Board’s authorization and direction, the Benefits Committee hereby
removes all references to the NQDC Plan in the Stock Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:



1.




     Section 2 of the Stock Plan hereby is amended by deleting subsections (h) and (m) in their
entirety and by realphabetizing the remaining subsections thereof.



2.




     Section 7 of the Stock Plan hereby is amended by deleting subsection (e) of the Plan in its
entirety and by realphabetizing the remaining subsections thereof.



3.




     Subsection 10(i) hereby is amended by deleting “other than Deferred Shares” in the second
sentence thereof and by deleting the third sentence in its entirety.



4.




     The effective date of this First Amendment to the Stock Plan shall be December 31, 2006.



{Signature Page Follows}




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to the Stock Plan as of
the 24th day of July, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                                        /s/ Eric Haskell
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                                        /s/ Laura Porter
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                                       /s/ Jane Jennings
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-1 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Chase Bank Statement Page 1 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-1 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Chase Bank Statement Page 2 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-1 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Chase Bank Statement Page 3 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-1 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Chase Bank Statement Page 4 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 385

 384

 403

 423

 403

 417

 414

 388

 368

 335

 342

 325

 347

 347

 368

 304

 344

 351

 366

 377

 390

 366

 399

 397

 403

 419

 401

 407

 414

 415

 416

 310

 320

 331

 315

 331

 325

 293

 264

 255

 241

 248

 245

 239

 250

 254

 260

 283

 285

 304

 319

 325

 329

 323

 315

 301

 271

 260

 277

 280

 292

 311

 330

 343

 351

 353

 347

 347

 327

 298

 286

 277

 271

 267

 260

 271

 291

 268

 300

 309

 326

 334

 335

 340

 342

 334

 334

 305

 332

 335

 355

 367

 367

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 220

 228

 233

 234

 230

 230

 218

 200

 193

 187

 183

 181

 177

 183

 196

 182

 201

 207

 217

 222

 223

 226

 227

 222

 222

 204

 221

 223

 235

 243

 243

TOTAL 9,902

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 19.34 Experimental or research operations by scientific institutions and colleges of learning. ( a ) *General.* The appropriate TTB officer may authorize any scientific university, college of learning, or institution of scientific research to produce, receive, blend, treat, test, and store spirits, without payment of tax, for experimental or research use but not for consumption (other than in organoleptic tests) or sale, in quantities as may be reasonably necessary for those purposes.
( b ) *Waiver.* For purposes of this section, the appropriate TTB officer may waive any provision of 26 U.S.C. chapter 51 (other than 26 U.S.C. 5312) or this part (other than this section and § 19.35) to the extent necessary to effect the purposes of 26 U.S.C. 5312(a). However, TTB will not waive the payment of any tax on distilled spirits removed from any university, college, or institution.
(26 U.S.C. 5312)
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

February-06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Feb-06 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2,633 4,320 6,953 5,222 8,569 13,792-Feb-06 0 0 0 1 6 0 6 2 4,270 4,337 8,607 8,469 8,602 17,073-Feb-06 0 12 12 2 0 0 0 2 3,963 4,266 8,229 7,861 8,462 16,324-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3,991 4,240 8,232 7,917 8,411 16,325-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 3 0 3 2 4,649 4,236 8,885 9,221 8,402 17,626-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4,247 4,322 8,569 8,424 8,573 16,997-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 2 3,098 4,316 7,413 6,144 8,560 14,708-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4,213 4,350 8,563 8,356 8,629 16,989-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4,213 4,345 8,558 8,356 8,618 16,97

10-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 4,676 4,343 9,019 9,275 8,614 17,8811-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 4,675 4,321 8,996 9,273 8,570 17,8412-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 2 4,741 4,319 9,059 9,403 8,566 17,9613-Feb-06 0 12 12 3 0 0 0 2 3,983 4,367 8,350 7,901 8,661 16,5614-Feb-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4,517 4,387 8,904 8,959 8,702 17,66

15-Feb-06 0 12 12 3 0 0 0 2 5,367 4,318 9,685 10,645 8,565 19,2116-Feb-06 0 12 12 3 9 0 9 2 7,206 4,339 11,545 14,293 8,606 22,8917-Feb-06 0 12 12 3 6 0 6 2 6,002 4,419 10,421 11,905 8,765 20,6718-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5,986 4,407 10,393 11,874 8,741 20,6119-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 5,986 4,342 10,328 11,874 8,612 20,4820-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 2 5,982 4,293 10,275 11,865 8,515 20,3821-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 6,029 4,338 10,367 11,958 8,605 20,5622-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 6,373 4,352 10,724 12,640 8,632 21,2723-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 6 0 6 2 5,525 4,328 9,853 10,959 8,585 19,5424-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 2 6,034 4,306 10,340 11,968 8,541 20,5025-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 9 0 9 3 6,029 4,261 10,290 11,958 8,452 20,4126-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 12 0 12 3 5,797 4,273 10,070 11,499 8,475 19,9727-Feb-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 3,922 4,238 8,160 7,779 8,407 16,1828-Feb-06 0 12 12 3 0 0 0 3 1,213 4,103 5,315 2,405 8,138 10,54

Total 0 72 72 XXXX 69 0 69 XXXX 135,318 120,785 256,103 268,403 239,578 507,98

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for February = 1,700

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Tracy Combine
### §4046. Shock incarceration program

(a) The Bureau of Prisons may place in a shock incarceration program any person who is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than 12, but not more than 30, months, if such person consents to that placement.

(b) For such initial portion of the term of imprisonment as the Bureau of Prisons may determine, not to exceed 6 months, an inmate in the shock incarceration program shall be required to—

(1) adhere to a highly regimented schedule that provides the strict discipline, physical training, hard labor, drill, and ceremony characteristic of military basic training; and

(2) participate in appropriate job training and educational programs (including literacy programs) and drug, alcohol, and other counseling programs.

(c) An inmate who in the judgment of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons has successfully completed the required period of shock incarceration shall remain in the custody of the Bureau for such period (not to exceed the remainder of the prison term otherwise required by law to be served by that inmate), and under such conditions, as the Bureau deems appropriate.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXX, §3001(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4915.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization of Appropriations

Pub. L. 101–647, title XXX, §3002, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4915, provided that: "There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1990 and each fiscal year thereafter such sums as may be necessary to carry out the shock incarceration program established under the amendments made by this Act [see Tables for classification]".
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

MONASSER OMIAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION February 26, 2015

v No. 310743 Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, LC No. 10-000099

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: R ONAYNE K RAUSE , P.J., and W ILDER and S TEPHENS , JJ.

S TEPHENS

, J. (concurring )

I agree with the majority that the MCAC operated under the wro ng legal framework,

DiBenedetto

, 461 Mich at 401-402, for failing to address the magistrate’s de cision to exclude not only the indictment but any witne sses who could testify to the facts which gave rise to that indictment. I agree with the di ssent that the ability to engag e in illegal activity does not equate with the ability to earn wages within the meaning of the statut e. However, I cannot say that the physical and mental efforts requi red in every illegal activity have no bearing on an individual’s ability to earn legal wages or perform work. For example, whil e passively laundering funds would not likely translate into e vidence of the ability to enga ge in legal work, managing those laundered funds by arranging for transfers, keeping records of the transactions, and delivering the funds to third parties could be relevant to the ability to earn legal income. I agree that the argument here is laced with hyperbole, but the record does prov ide proof that the defendant requested and was refused the opportunity to pres ent witnesses to testify to the facts underlying the indictment. Whether upon review the MCAC will find that th e magistrate’s decision to

decline to admit such evidence was in error remains to be seen. However, because I cannot make a finding as a matter of law that the evidence has no lega l relevance I concur that the

MCAC should review the issue.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
exv10w8



 





Exhibit 10.8




Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation



Each non-employee director of Forrester Research, Inc. receives an annual retainer of $10,000,
payable quarterly in arrears, and members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors receive
$1,500 for each meeting they attend, with the Chairman of the Audit Committee receiving an
additional $5,000 per year. In addition, members of the Board of Directors are reimbursed for
expenses incurred in attending any meeting of the Board of Directors or a Committee thereof.



Under the Stock Option Plan for Directors, following each annual meeting of stockholders, each
non-employee director receives an option to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock at an
exercise price equal to the fair market value on that date. These options vest in four equal annual
installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date. Each
non-employee director who is newly elected between annual meetings receives an option to purchase
6,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date he or
she is first elected as a director. These options also vest in four equal annual installments, with
the first installment vested on the date of grant.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,194.42

 1,194.42

 1,194.41

 1,194.39

 1,194.38

 1,194.36

 1,194.34

 1,194.33

 1,194.32

 1,194.30

 1,194.30

 1,194.27

 1,194.25

 1,194.25

 1,194.24

 1,194.22

 1,194.21

 1,194.20

 1,194.18

 1,194.17

 1,194.17

 1,194.18

 1,194.40

 1,194.40

 1,194.40

 1,194.40

 1,194.38

 1,194.13

 1,194.16

 1,194.18

 41.87

 41.87

 41.85

 41.82

 41.81

 41.77

 41.74

 41.72

 41.71

 41.68

 41.68

 41.63

 41.59

 41.59

 41.58

 41.55

 41.53

 41.51

 41.48

 41.47

 41.47

 41.48

 41.84

 41.84

 41.84

 41.84

 41.81

 41.40

 41.45

 41.48

STORAGE

-0.03

+0.00

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

+0.00

-0.05

-0.03

+0.00

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.36

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.03

-0.41

+0.05

+0.03

CHANGE

-6

13

7

-1

7

-2

-3

8

9

1

16

-11

-3

10

2

-3

1

5

-3

5

14

21

189

13

10

10

-2

-190

37

25

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

OUTLET

 0

 3

 5

 6

 5

 4

 4

 6

 7

 8

 6

 3

 4

 0

 0

 3

 0

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 0

 3

 0

 0

 4

 4

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .00

 .06

 .10

 .12

 .09

 .08

 .07

 .12

 .14

 .15

 .11

 .06

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .08

 .05

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .08

 .05

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .38

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/28/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.43 179 295 0 97 1.82 .85

ACRE-FEET -430 355 585 0 192

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 585

 585

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .85

JULY 1, 2000 3.01

 41.90
! 

"
	#$

 	!

%&	'&

		%(
)	*+)
	),
%



%&%)	)
-./#'$	)0	"
	0	


%'	
1%("(%1%''
	2'0%3)4+2%	%(


'
)	+
		
2
	'
	2+25)')2
6%2%%%

"%	
'	2%
	2%%	
'2%("2%&%2+%%

733+	
'2%()2		

2"2*

	"*	2%&%2+2%%)		

733+2"
	#$*"4'
%4%(%&
)


899999999
4	:

)	0%%#$2*
2
%
	2	;2%%

)		

733+*%		22	%")"4
<4*&&2%%

	'%	"*0	22

%'
		)
%
)	

')42'	*6)	)
-.#$#$#=$+2%%)		

733+2%&%4
%'	1	
	*
%

%*%0%')'	
	*012%&&2%4*"
	'
&&'&


' 	)2%4%4	
	%%')4	
	*
	&
*%

2&%%	2

733+	
"
	%	"*21%2	%(
4

%7	2	2%
	2	
2

&)%4
%'

40%4	:


=:	)'*
)	0%%>2*
	*
%7	2	

2"
	#$"&:%(*&"**	
4422)'%
+&4
*	


	%7	2	
	*	
44%(&44'**	
4422)'%

	

"%
		)

999999999999999999999999999

 4%! %2	2

-.=:	)'*)2(


:?
	%

@@
&<A
	&


&<A
	&+	)


	B%(
.	+.>


462	%+
>

#$ CC

.=DC>

-0.00-

/s/ Klinette H Kindred Feb 24 2021

Entered On Docket: February 24, 2021

Case 20-12378-KHK Doc 62 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/24/21 13:39:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
7	2	
%&%4+<(


1%E%*

D ! 

F
'43)4G#$	%%'%


<)	)
F
'43)4G#$+
	(
%(
	2	0&%42"*%	'4

&%4+
(	%2



1%E%*

.)(	F

%+


  @@
&<A
	&9


&<A
	&+		)


	



1%E%*

	"
	

.)(	F

%+



&<A
	&

		)

B%(
.	+.>


462	%+
>

Case 20-12378-KHK Doc 62 Filed 02/24/21 Entered 02/24/21 13:39:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,585

 3,055

 3,122

 3,389

 3,839

 4,443

 3,919

 4,284

 4,183

 4,168

 3,860

 3,253

 2,587

 2,869

 3,879

 3,157

 3,331

 3,295

 3,922

 4,784

 5,761

 3,164

 2,421

 983

 474

 362

 278

 237

 219

 211

 218

 288

 295

 316

 357

 348

 348

 380

 429

 447

 423

 452

 449

 415

 397

 381

 384

 369

 402

 429

 473

 602

 384

 364

 294

 258

 241

 202

 191

 195

 195

 198

 465

 813

 797

 917

 1,053

 1,379

 976

 1,381

 1,390

 1,427

 1,346

 1,162

 961

 863

 1,117

 837

 900

 1,015

 1,317

 1,643

 2,002

 1,024

 952

 418

 333

 278

 237

 208

 204

 202

 207

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 16, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,921

 9,298

 9,542

 9,656

 9,886

 10,547

 10,736

 11,401

 11,966

 12,704

 13,486

 14,108

 14,526

 14,930

 15,582

 15,606

 15,709

 15,807

 16,071

 16,335

 17,361

 17,004

 16,566

 15,557

 14,544

 13,660

 12,936

 12,281

 11,368

 10,733

 10,040

 637

 664

 682

 690

 706

 753

 767

 814

 855

 907

 963

 1,008

 1,038

 1,066

 1,113

 1,115

 1,122

 1,129

 1,148

 1,167

 1,240

 1,215

 1,183

 1,111

 1,039

 976

 924

 877

 812

 767

 717

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### In the Matter of Charles I. Woodard, Petitioner, against Lewis J. Valentine, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

In a proceeding- under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the respondent police commissioner in dismissing the petitioner from his position as patrolman in the police department, City of New York, determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1017.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 542.30

 542.30

 542.30

 542.30

 542.30

 542.30

 542.30

 542.23

 542.20

 542.18

 542.18

 542.20

 542.10

 542.10

 542.11

 542.10

 542.10

 542.11

 542.30

 542.60

 543.10

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 543.30

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,947

 2,018,059

 2,017,679

 2,017,425

 2,017,425

 2,017,679

 2,016,411

 2,016,411

 2,016,537

 2,016,411

 2,016,411

 2,016,537

 2,018,947

 2,022,755

 2,029,106

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 2,031,649

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 295

 3,446

 3,428

 3,428

 3,436

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL May 23, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2006 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 11,813 0 2,453 93,054

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-889

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

-888

-380

-254

 0

 254

-1,268

 0

 126

-126

 0

 126

 2,410

 3,808

 6,351

 2,543

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 253

 123

 167

 62

 61

 61

 59

 61

 98

 163

 159

 155

 155

 108

 63

 60

 55

 54

 54

 53

 63

 44

 49

 37

 31

 40

 32

 29

 28

 33

 43

-539

2,001

3,908

3,966

3,966

3,966

3,968

3,567

4,775

4,796

4,913

5,529

4,844

5,441

5,522

5,410

5,470

5,692

4,754

3,571

4,706

3,005

-27

-20

-17

-22

-18

-16

-15

-18

-24

ELEV STORAGE

 14,033

 874,900

 876,901

 880,809

 884,775

 888,741

 892,707

 896,675

 900,242

 905,017

 909,813

 914,726

 920,255

 925,099

 930,540

 936,062

 941,472

 946,942

 952,634

 957,388

 960,959

 965,665

 968,670

 968,643

 968,623

 968,606

 968,584

 968,566

 968,550

 968,535

 968,517

 968,493

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 875,439

0

2,069

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

4,000

5,000

5,000

5,000

5,500

5,500

5,500

5,500

5,500

5,500

5,500

1,800

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

81,369
§ 81.5 Authority and responsibility of an Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) An ALJ assigned to a case conducts a hearing on the record. The ALJ regulates the course of the proceedings and the conduct of the parties to ensure a fair, expeditious, and economical resolution of the case in accordance with applicable law.
( b ) An ALJ is bound by all applicable statutes and regulations and may neither waive them nor rule them invalid.
( c ) An ALJ is disqualified in any case in which the ALJ has a substantial interest, has been of counsel, is or has been a material witness, or is so related to or connected with any party or the party's attorney as to make it improper for the ALJ to be assigned to the case.
( d ) ( 1 ) An ALJ may disqualify himself or herself at any time on the basis of the standards in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) A party may file a motion to disqualify an ALJ under the standards in paragraph (c) of this section. A motion to disqualify must be accompanied by an affidavit that meets the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 556(b). Upon the filing of such a motion and affidavit, the ALJ decides the disqualification matter before proceeding further with the case.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 556(b); 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1234 (d), (f)(1) and (g)(1), and 3474(a))
#### § 7.0 Who are employees.

As used in this part, the term *Government employee* means any officer or employee, civilian or military, except such part-time employees or part-time consultants as may be excluded therefrom by a determination made in writing by the head of the employee's office or constituent organization, pursuant to an exemption approved by the Commissioner of Patents that to include him or them would be impracticable or inequitable, given the reasons therefor. A person shall not be considered to be a part-time employee or part-time consultant for this purpose unless the terms of his employment contemplate that he shall work for less than the minimum number of hours per day, or less than a minimum number of days per week, or less than the minimum number of weeks per year, regularly required of full-time employees of his class.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In the Matter of:

MONICA N. SANTOS

DEBTOR

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION

Movant

v.

Monica N. Santos

and

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee,

Chapter 13

Case No. 18-13067-BFK

ANSWER AND REPORT OF TRUSTEE 

TO RELIEF FROM STAY MOTION

COMES NOW Thomas P. Gorman, the Chapter 13 Trustee named upon this 

Motion for Relief from Stay, and states that he has no opposition to the relief requested. 

AND HAVING FULLY ANSWERED, your Trustee prays for such disposition of 

this Motion as to this Court seems just.

Date: October 15, 2018 __/s/ Thomas P. Gorman_________

Thomas P. Gorman

Chapter 13 Trustee

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400

Alexandria, VA 22314

(703) 836-2226

VSB 26421

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Answer & Report of Trustee was served via 

ECF to authorized users or mailed to counsel for the Movant and counsel for the Debtor, 

or to Debtor Pro Se, this 15th day of October, 2018. 

/s/ Thomas P. Gorman___________

Thomas P. Gorman

Case 18-13067-BFK Doc 19 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 13:47:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1