alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!


"
	#$

 	!"
#

%	&%
		'(
	)*
'


'%'+',	-).'&#
/


.%..
/
$0.

,,12
'
3
	'('445'4.5366.%..
563

663+	
	45'&.
		'(
7)8366.	)	.

#4
'&445$	'(3
"
	*&
)4	.#4
'&445$3.
)4
	

	(	'.
9.'&4.
9	.#4
'&445$0.

,,12'
)		:'
)45	..&
.''
445.'.%
'



.'%'"5	(	'.
9.'&4.
93"5	.		.

:%"	;3

6#
/
8$3+'&	.		
:'.

	
)(
).)	'

&3	)44.
"
	.
"
	*

&
)4
'&

)4'
"
	''%45+''5%	)'

)
	'9.
&
%%)'&.'	&45+'
"
	
	')	

"
	.
&)	

.)4+''.53
	'
"
	.)4'%+''%
	'
.3

	)44'4	''&'


)4.	

.	.	
'4'(


	''&'


)43&+'44".'%'.+'	-).'&
		'
.
5	

 <1,,123		:'+
	()%
	)3
)4
	

	(	'.
9.'&4.
93.
"
	*&
)43	)*
'
'

	
	.
)4."(	.
		
.	
%&3'&4).'(")4'%'.


Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 58 Filed 06/16/20 Entered 06/16/20 12:13:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
	.	

'%'4+',	-).'&

= !


		')	


&
'
	:.
)
"
	
'&
,45%.)4	>)'	.

).	'
)	*	:'
)	.	3''	
		"5

3'	&

		')	
".	"5'.'%'.

+'	-).'&

"
	*	'(
'4''
)	)
'4
'.?
.3

'5?/	)&5
)	3
		'
.
+
#$5		
%.
	5
'

	.	

3      ."
	#$  5    "4&  
    '4'(    '   %
)  


@AAAAAAAA
4	/

)	+''#6$.5
.
'
	.	0.'')		

35'		..	'")"4
,45%%.''

	&'	"5+	..

'&
		)
'
)	&)4

.&	5B)	)
?6#$#$#$3.'')		

3.'%'4
'&	:	
	5
''5

'+'&)&	
	5+:.'%%.'45"
	&
%%&%
& 

	).'4'4	
	''&)4	
	5
	%
5'.%''	.

."
	#$"%/'(5%"55	
44..)&'
3%4
5	
	

'	.	
	5	
44'(%44&55	
44..)&'

	"'


		)


.AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

	' !5

?/	)&57).(

0.00

Jun 16 2020 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: June 16, 2020

Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 58 Filed 06/16/20 Entered 06/16/20 12:13:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
	.	

'%'4+',	-).'&

= !


		')	


?! <?

ACC
%,2
	%AAAAAAAAA


%,2
	%

		)

66D'(
?	0?866

4B.	'3E8

#F6$;GG

E?=G8

?11.711


  CC1	47"	")	37	  

1	47"	")	37	

4?

3E66


)4
	
"
	

?11

  CC7
'	.E':
 

7
'	.E':


7
E':
3,H

G6!'(?	3?866

4B.	'3E8


)4
		(	'.
9.'&4.
9

H
&4)46#$	''&'



	(
'(
	.	+.
	."5.C
		:.)
44&	5	')	)


H
&4)46#$

CC
%,2
	%


%,2
	%3		)

Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 58 Filed 06/16/20 Entered 06/16/20 12:13:37 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
	.	

'%'4+',	-).'&

= !


		')	



	



		')	


	
"
	

;'44?	'(.

 	.	'&/")	(3E86G

1	47"	")	37	


	5
	
"
	

4?

3E66


)4
	
"
	

7
'	.E':



	5
		(	'.
9.'&4.
9

7
E':
3,H

G6!'(?	3?866

4B.	'3E8


%,2
	%

		)

66D'(
?	3?)'866

4B.	'3E8

Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 58 Filed 06/16/20 Entered 06/16/20 12:13:37 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE § No. 59, 2018 PETITION OF IBE LYLES FOR A § WRIT OF PROHIBITION § Submitted: May 30, 2018 Decided: June 4, 2018 ORDER On May 7, 2018, the Office of the Cl erk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing the petitioner, Ibe Lyles, to show cause why his petition for a writ of prohibition should not be dism issed as moot because, afte r filing his petition, Lyles pleaded guilty in the underl ying Superior Court action. * Lyles received the notice to show cause on May 18, 2018 and has not responded to the notice within the required ten-day period. Dismissal of the petition is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, unde r Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the petition for a writ of prohibition is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

* State v. Lyles , Del. Super., Cr. ID No. 1708008011.
§ 81.30 Basis for recovery of funds. ( a ) Subject to the provisions of § 81.31, an authorized Departmental official requires a recipient to return funds to the Department if— ( 1 ) The recipient made an unallowable expenditure of funds under a grant or cooperative agreement; or
( 2 ) The recipient otherwise failed to discharge its obligation to account properly for funds under a grant or cooperative agreement.
( b ) An authorized Departmental offcial may base a decision to require a recipient to return funds upon an audit report, an investigative report, a monitoring report, or any other evidence.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1234a(a) (1) and (2))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 58 FR 43473, Aug. 16, 1993]
### §2502. Purposes

The purposes of this Act are—

(1) to approve and implement the trade agreements negotiated under the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.];

(2) to foster the growth and maintenance of an open world trading system;

(3) to expand opportunities for the commerce of the United States in international trade; and

(4) to improve the rules of international trade and to provide for the enforcement of such rules, and for other purposes.

(Pub. L. 96–39, §1(c), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in provision preceding par. (1), is Pub. L. 96–39, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 144, known as the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 2501 of this title and Tables.

The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in par. (1), is Pub. L. 93–618, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1978, which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§2101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 2101 of this title and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 412.23

 412.02

 411.91

 411.75

 411.51

 411.25

 410.93

 410.82

 411.01

 412.95

 417.76

 419.46

 420.18

 420.68

 421.01

 421.26

 421.42

 421.54

 421.65

 421.73

 421.79

 421.97

 422.09

 422.14

 422.87

 424.60

 426.44

 427.25

 466.6

 465.0

 464.2

 463.0

 461.2

 459.2

 456.8

 455.9

 457.4

 472.1

 509.8

 523.6

 529.5

 533.6

 536.3

 538.4

 539.7

 540.7

 541.6

 542.3

 542.8

 544.3

 545.3

 545.7

 551.8

 566.5

 582.3

 589.4

STORAGE

-1.8

-1.6

-0.8

-1.2

-1.8

-2.0

-2.4

-0.8

+1.4

+14.7

+37.7

+13.8

+5.9

+4.1

+2.7

+2.1

+1.3

+1.0

+0.9

+0.7

+0.5

+1.5

+1.0

+0.4

+6.1

+14.7

+15.8

+7.0

CHANGE

1,275

1,234

1,437

1,384

1,107

984

1,141

1,526

2,536

9,296

20,443

8,748

4,781

3,689

3,316

3,046

2,652

2,499

2,353

2,416

2,194

2,689

2,460

2,316

5,102

9,198

9,613

5,470

INFLOW

 2,035

 1,898

 1,702

 1,818

 1,879

 1,860

 2,233

 1,836

 1,720

 1,760

 1,302

 1,689

 1,661

 1,495

 1,825

 1,871

 1,841

 1,860

 1,760

 1,934

 1,814

 1,814

 1,847

 1,989

 1,899

 1,702

 1,507

 1,798

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 38

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 115

 139

 145

 158

 127

 102

 112

 95

 99

 110

 110

 111

 108

 109

 110

 106

 113

 111

 113

 116

 109

 104

 100

 99

 102

 101

 104

 107

PUMPING

 10

 5

 10

 18

 15

 13

 13

 10

 0

 0

 8

 16

 8

 8

 11

 22

 28

 25

 20

 31

 20

 17

 6

 17

 17

 0

 17

 12

C.F.S.

 .04

 .02

 .04

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .08

 .10

 .09

 .07

 .11

 .07

 .06

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .00

 .06

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 .32

 .77

 1.81

 .35

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .60

 .00

 .13

 .76

 .84

 .43

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +120.9 114,905 50,349 41 0 3,135 377 1.38 6.21

ACRE-FEET +120,900 227,914 99,867 81 0 6,218 748

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 99,867

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 81

 6,218

TOTAL 106,166

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2006 TO DATE = 11.75

 468.4

OUTLET 0 6.21

Table 11
#### STATE, Respondent, v. RUMPEL, et al, Appellants.

(264 N. W. 820.)

(File No. 7842.

Opinion filed February 7, 1936.)

*Leo M. Fitzpatrick,*of Sioux Palls, for Appellants.

*Louis N. Crill,*State’s Attorney, of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

*142PER QU'RIAM.

On the 21st day of 'May, 1935, a certified copy of the notice of appeal, and of the undertaking on appeal, were filed in the office of the clerk of this court. Since said date no brief or other paper of any kind has been filed herein; nor have any other steps in the prosecution of said appeal been taken; therefore, said appeal is deemed to have been abandoned1, and the order herein appealed from is affirmed. -

All Judges concurring.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5110

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 ensure representatives of aviation roundtables may participate in the 
  NextGen performance-based navigation implementation process of the 
        Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2019

  Ms. Speier (for herself, Mr. Case, Ms. Norton, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
Panetta, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Rouda, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. 
Raskin, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Smith of Washington, and Mr. Neguse) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 ensure representatives of aviation roundtables may participate in the 
  NextGen performance-based navigation implementation process of the 
        Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All Participating in Process 
Reaching Informed Solutions for Everyone Act'' or the ``APPRISE Act''.

SEC. 2. PERFORMANCE-BASED NAVIGATION IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out the implementation process for 
NextGen performance-based navigation (as described in FAA Order 
JO7100.41A, or any subsequent similar order), the Administrator of the 
Federal Aviation Administration shall ensure that any covered aviation 
roundtable may appoint a technical representative or consultant to 
participate as member of the core working group or the full working 
group of such process on the same terms and conditions as a 
representative of the industry, an airport, or a participating 
proponent of a procedure.
    (b) Covered Aviation Roundtable Defined.--The term ``covered 
aviation roundtable'' means an aviation roundtable--
            (1) that is the actual or de facto proponent of a proposed 
        new or modified performance-based navigation flight procedure; 
        or
            (2) for which the modified procedure path to be implemented 
        in the process described in subsection (a) is within 5 miles of 
        the jurisdictional area of the aviation roundtable.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
Senate a report on the progress made toward implementing the 
requirements under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven B. Lapin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                      March 29, 2004


                                      /s/ Steven B. Lapin *

                                      Steven B. Lapin
                                      President and Chief Operating Officer

     * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital Media
Group Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Alain Krzentowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                         /s/ Alain Krzentowski
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Alain Krzentowski
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         December 20, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.178 Marks and brands on containers of specially denatured spirits. ( a ) *Required marks.* Each dealer who fills packages of specially denatured spirits shall mark or label each package with the following information: ( 1 ) Quantity, in gallons, or in liters and gallons;
( 2 ) Package identification number or serial number (see § 20.179);
( 3 ) Name and permit number of the dealer;
( 4 ) The words “Specially Denatured Alcohol” or “Specially Denatured Rum,” or an appropriate abbreviation;
( 5 ) Formula number;
( 6 ) Proof, if the spirits were denatured at other than 190° proof;
( 7 ) Denaturants used, if alcohol was denatured under an approved formula authorizing a choice of denaturants; and
( 8 ) Quantity of denaturants used, if the approved formula authorizes a choice of quantities of denaturants.
( b ) *Location of marks.* The dealer shall place the required marks on the head of the package or on the side of the case.
( c ) *Other marks.* Other marks authorized by this paragraph may not interfere with or detract from the marks required by this subpart. The dealer may place marks other than the required marks on the Government head or Government side of the package if the other marks— ( 1 ) Are authorized by the appropriate TTB officer, or
( 2 ) Consist of a brand name, or consist of caution notices, or consist of other material required by Federal or State law or regulations.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1360, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5206))
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CorVu Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph Caffarelli, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      Dated: April 25, 2006

                                              /s/ Joseph J. Caffarelli
                                              ------------------------
                                                  Joseph  J. Caffarelli
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
!" #

 $%&	! 

												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 
'%& 												 	 												



	

	


#
	(		)$	%	(%	%	
$	%	)%%	%*	+%	,(%-	

%	(&)		)$$&%	./	&	'*	%	
'%&0		

123	3


3	4#356	%	$$&7	%	%	)&%	%%	%	
'%&	./

%	 '8&)$%*		 	(&	 6	 	 +%	 ,%%	 -6		 	3&&	 .&	/.	9

%&0		%

51#	22
:	%%	%	
'%&		%9	+	$&&	$%&	! 	;8&)$%*	

$7	9%		+!	*&	$&&	%	%	./7	.	%	6	9	$&&		9&	0	

%

51#	22
:	%%	%	(%			%	.	#&7		'	$&$&/*

&	)$	//	&%&		$&%		%&%0		%

51#	22
:	%%	%	
'%&	9	)'/	%	$$&	%	%	&7		%

(%		%	)&%	&<)&	&	$&0	%	6	&7/*6


  

    
 %% 	 % 	 )%% 	 %* 	 . 	 !! 	 1

=	 "+		&'*	$		%	
'%&6	%	
'%&>	$&$&%*6	//	&%&6		$&$&%*	.	%

'8&)$%*	%%	%&)7		/)7	)	!?6	0		%	

			+@;A	 B!	

	C	2$6	2	

2	3	;D	EB	

6	@&7	 !BFEB	

/$	+BG	EFHE

	


Case 20-31633-KRH Doc 19 Filed 04/17/20 Entered 04/17/20 08:49:39 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
51#	3

	%%	%	&7		%	(%		&'*	%)	%	)	!?6

	%	!	$	


%	IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII	

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

1	;8&)$%*	)7	

%&		
8%	IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII	


	8	.&	%	

	 	 JJ	 	 									 	 												

			+@;A	 B!	

	C	2$6	2	

2	3	;D	EB	

6	@&7	 !BFEB	

/$	+BG	EFHE

	






2)&)% 	 % 	 / 	 )/ 	 HF!+6 	 
 	 &'* 	 &%.* 	 %% 	 // 	 &* 	 $&% 	 

&	%	'	&&	

	 	 JJ			

)/	.&	
'%&



Apr 16 2020

/s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Apr 17 2020

Case 20-31633-KRH Doc 19 Filed 04/17/20 Entered 04/17/20 08:49:39 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
 !
"#!$ 

		6	<)&

	C	2$6	2	

2	3	;D	EB	

6	@&7	 !BFEB

//*	K/	/%

E	4'&8	
&

5&&8')&76	@	G?

&/	(	;%6	<)&	

$%&	! 	&)%	

23	;D	!B!H

6	@	 !B

3..	.	%	1	&)%	

?!		;&	%&%	

	G G	

6	@&7	 !H	

 

Case 20-31633-KRH Doc 19 Filed 04/17/20 Entered 04/17/20 08:49:39 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
(No. 6432

#### Berz Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 27, 1972.*

Berz Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.80 Formula No. 45. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: Three hundred pounds of refined white or orange shellac.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 015. Candy glazes.
( 2 ) Miscellaneous uses:
812 Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
(No. 6899

#### R. Herschel Manufacturing Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

R. Herschel Manufacturing Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
United States Bankruptcy Court 

Eastern District of Virginia 

______________ Division

In re: Case No.______________________________ 

Adv. Proceeding No._____________________ 

 Civil Action No. ________________________ 

 Debtor(s) 

TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD ON APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Ț158, Notice of Appeal was filed on ________________ and transmitted on ________________. 

1. ( ) Order/Judgment, Docket Record, Designation(s) [if any], and Items Designated 

2. ( ) Copy of restricted transcript(s), if designated, included as separate electronic file(s) 

3. ( ) Copies of exhibits, if designated, included as a separate file(s): ___ electronic and/or ___ conventional, on paper 

4. ( ) Copies of exhibits designated by Appellant/Appellee, filed conventionally, have not been submitted pursuant to FRBP 8009 and LBR 8009-1 

5. ( ) Other Documents _________________________________________________________________________________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6. ( ) No Designation of Record on Appeal filed (See Certification Below) 

 

 WILLIAM C. REDDEN, Clerk of Court 

Date: ___________________________ By _____________________________________, Deputy Clerk 

..............................................................................................................................................................................

CERTIFICATION TO APPELLATE COURT 

It is hereby certified that the designation of record required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009 and Local Bankruptcy Rule 8009-1 

has not been filed within 14 days after the filing of the notice of appeal. 

 WILLIAM C. REDDEN, Clerk of Court 

 By: ____________________________________, Deputy Clerk 

..............................................................................................................................................................................

RECEIPT OF EXHIBITS BY DISTRICT COURT [if applicable] 

The undersigned deputy clerk of the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, hereby acknowledges receipt of one or more exhibits from 

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, which are submitted conventionally, on paper, to be made a part of the Record on Appeal in Civil Action No. 

________________________.

Date: ____________________________ By: ____________________________________, Deputy Clerk 

 

 [transeapp ver. 12/14] 

Richmond

Circuit City Stores, Inc. 08-35653-KRH

19-03091-KRH

 3:23cv1-MHL

12/26/2022 01/03/2023

✔

✔

February 7, 2023 /s/Suzan Ramirez-Lowe

Case 19-03091-KRH Doc 80 Filed 02/07/23 Entered 02/07/23 12:23:08 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8378]



[[Page 19753]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Termination of Department of Defense Federal Advisory Committees

AGENCY: DoD.

ACTION: Termination of Federal Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 41 CFR 102-3.55(a)(1), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b), effective June 11, 2011 the 
Department of Defense gives notice that it is terminating the 
Transformation Advisory Group.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Jim Freeman, Deputy Advisory 
Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-601-
6128.

    Dated: April 1, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-8378 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P