alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 381.39

 381.50

 381.62

 381.96

 382.28

 382.27

 382.60

 382.62

 382.77

 383.27

 383.90

 384.28

 384.58

 384.57

 385.11

 385.82

 386.54

 387.10

 387.66

 388.18

 389.04

 389.37

 389.73

 390.01

 390.09

 390.26

 390.92

 391.41

 391.81

 392.42

 382,898

 383,678

 384,530

 386,946

 389,225

 389,154

 391,509

 391,652

 392,725

 396,307

 400,838

 403,580

 405,750

 405,678

 409,593

 414,763

 420,029

 424,142

 428,270

 432,116

 438,504

 440,965

 443,655

 445,751

 446,351

 447,626

 452,589

 456,287

 459,314

 463,945

 0

 0

 0

 1,094

 801

 0

 3,130

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,288

 3,069

 3,033

 3,016

 5,787

 2,196

 2,923

 2,186

 716

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL January 22, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2014 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 83,949 0 1,202 24,009

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 2,902

 780

 852

 2,416

 2,279

-71

 2,355

 143

 1,073

 3,582

 4,531

 2,742

 2,170

-72

 3,915

 5,170

 5,266

 4,113

 4,128

 3,846

 6,388

 2,461

 2,690

 2,096

 600

 1,275

 4,963

 3,698

 3,027

 4,631

 38

 38

 39

 35

 37

 37

 37

 37

 36

 40

 37

 37

 36

 36

 30

 40

 44

 44

 42

 45

 45

 44

 44

 41

 45

 46

 46

 48

 41

 37

-161

-31

-190

718

731

-52

2,730

44

-426

-173

-301

-179

86

-52

-357

-236

2,010

2,587

2,803

2,776

5,584

1,947

2,777

2,103

511

-132

-329

-245

-269

-265

ELEV STORAGE

 30,239

 225,699

 225,668

 225,478

 226,196

 226,927

 226,875

 229,605

 229,649

 229,223

 229,050

 228,749

 228,570

 228,656

 228,604

 228,247

 228,011

 230,021

 232,608

 235,411

 238,187

 243,771

 245,718

 248,495

 250,598

 251,109

 250,977

 250,648

 250,403

 250,134

 249,869

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 225,860

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
§ 361.11 Withholding of funds. ( a ) *Basis for withholding.* The Secretary may withhold or limit payments under section 111 or 603(a) of the Act, as provided by section 107(c) of the Act, if the Secretary determines that— ( 1 ) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, including the supported employment supplement, has been so changed that it no longer conforms with the requirements of this part or part 363; or
( 2 ) In the administration of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan there is a failure to comply substantially with any provision of such plan or with an evaluation standard or performance indicator established under section 106 of the Act.
( b ) *Informal resolution.* Prior to withholding or limiting payments in accordance with this section, the Secretary attempts to resolve disputed issues informally with State officials.
( c ) *Notice.* If, after reasonable effort has been made to resolve the dispute, no resolution has been reached, the Secretary provides notice to the State agency of the intention to withhold or limit payments and of the opportunity for a hearing.
( d ) *Withholding hearing.* If the State agency requests a hearing, the Secretary designates one or more individuals, either from the Department or elsewhere, not responsible for or connected with the administration of this program, to conduct a hearing in accordance with the provisions of 34 CFR part 81, subpart A.
( e ) *Initial decision.* The hearing officer issues an initial decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.41.
( f ) *Petition for review of an initial decision.* The State agency may seek the Secretary's review of the initial decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.42.
( g ) *Review by the Secretary.* The Secretary reviews the initial decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.43.
( h ) *Final decision of the Department.* The final decision of the Department is made in accordance with 34 CFR 81.44.
( i ) *Judicial review.* A State may appeal the Secretary's decision to withhold or limit payments by filing a petition for review with the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the State is located, in accordance with section 107(d) of the Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(b), and 107(c) and (d) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(b) and 727(c) and (d))
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 13.25 Appeal of qualification or denial. ( a ) *Form of appeal.* If an applicant for a certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle approval wishes to appeal the qualified approval or denial of an application, the applicant may file a written appeal with the appropriate TTB officer within 45 days after the date of the notice of qualification or denial. The appeal should explain why the applicant believes that the label or bottle is in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If no appeal is filed within 45 days after the date of the notice of qualification or denial, the notice will be the final decision of TTB.
( b ) *Informal resolution.* Applicants may choose to pursue informal resolution of disagreements regarding correction sheets or qualifications by requesting an informal conference with the appropriate TTB officer. However, formal administrative appeals must comply with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.22 Wholesalers.

No person, except pursuant to a basic permit issued under the Act, shall:

(a) Engage in the business of purchasing for resale at wholesale, distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages; or,

(b) While so engaged, receive, sell, offer or deliver for sale, contract to sell, or ship in interstate or foreign commerce, directly or indirectly or through an affiliate, distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages so purchased.
(No. 77-CC-2451

#### Ernest J. Johnson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed January 9, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*273It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### **CHAPTER 2—THE TARIFF COMMISSION**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections related to the United States Tariff Commission as it existed prior to act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, 46 Stat. 696.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

United States Tariff Commission redesignated United States International Trade Commission by Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §171, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2009. See section 2231(a) of this title.
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 638

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey                                                URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/638/            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact                        Page Last Modified: Friday, October 28, 2011, 09:12:06 AM
### §583j–3. Administrative services and support

#### (a) Startup funds

For purposes of assisting the Foundation in establishing an office and meeting initial administrative, project, and other startup expenses, the Secretary is authorized to provide to the Foundation $500,000, from funds appropriated pursuant to section 583j–8(a) of this title, per year for the two years beginning October 1, 1992. Such funds shall remain available to the Foundation until they are expended for authorized purposes.

#### (b) Matching funds

In addition to the startup funds provided under subsection (a) of this section, during fiscal years 2016 through 2023, the Secretary is authorized to provide matching funds for administrative and project expenses incurred by the Foundation as authorized by section 583j–8(b) of this title including reimbursement of expenses under section 583j–1 of this title, not to exceed then current Federal Government per diem rates.

#### (c) Administrative expenses

At any time, the Secretary may provide the Foundation use of Department of Agriculture personnel, facilities, and equipment, with partial or no reimbursement, with such limitations and on such terms and conditions as the Secretary shall establish.

(Pub. L. 101–593, title IV, §405, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2972; Pub. L. 103–106, §3(a), Oct. 12, 1993, 107 Stat. 1031; Pub. L. 114–54, title II, §201(a), Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 515; Pub. L. 115–334, title VIII, §8503(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4847.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2015—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–54 substituted "during fiscal years 2016 through 2018" for "for a period of five years beginning October 1, 1992".

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–106, §3(a)(1), inserted ", project," after "administrative" and substituted "beginning October 1, 1992" for "following November 16, 1990".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–106, §3(a)(2), substituted "beginning October 1, 1992" for "from November 16, 1990" and inserted "and project" after "administrative".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purpose of Pub. L. 103–106

Pub. L. 103–106, §2, Oct. 12, 1993, 107 Stat. 1031, provided that: "It is the purpose of this Act [see Short Title of 1993 Amendment note set out under section 583j of this title]—

"(1) to provide for start-up and matching funds for project expenses to carry out the National Forest Foundation Act [16 U.S.C. 583j et seq.]; and

"(2) to extend the funding authorization for start-up expenses for 1 year."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 147

 143

 161

 137

 154

 173

 168

 166

 166

 166

 163

 163

 171

 190

 164

 157

 185

 187

 210

 223

 245

 317

 348

 332

 426

 357

 296

 300

 353

 363

 454

 136

 134

 131

 113

 132

 133

 134

 135

 140

 145

 145

 144

 144

 143

 144

 142

 143

 144

 147

 149

 155

 158

 161

 164

 167

 171

 170

 171

 166

 161

 171

 141

 138

 136

 133

 136

 140

 142

 144

 149

 152

 151

 150

 153

 151

 148

 146

 150

 153

 161

 169

 184

 202

 219

 225

 270

 215

 203

 209

 202

 190

 214

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,370

 2,350

 2,318

 2,285

 2,250

 2,214

 2,174

 2,135

 2,100

 2,069

 2,040

 2,019

 2,012

 2,016

 2,023

 2,031

 2,045

 2,065

 2,090

 2,119

 2,161

 2,219

 2,289

 2,362

 2,481

 2,546

 2,596

 2,654

 2,708

 2,752

 2,816

 169

 168

 166

 163

 161

 158

 155

 153

 150

 148

 146

 144

 144

 144

 145

 145

 146

 148

 149

 151

 154

 159

 164

 169

 177

 182

 185

 190

 193

 197

 201

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### George A. Farnham, Appellant, v. Le Bolt & Company, Respondent.

Judgment modified by striking therefrom the allowance of fifty dollars costs, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

§ 13.72 Effective dates of revocations. ( a ) *Effective dates* — ( 1 ) *Revocation of specific certificates.* A written decision to revoke a certificate becomes effective 60 days after the date of the decision.
( 2 ) *Revocation by operation of law or regulation.* If a certificate is revoked by operation of law or regulation, the revocation becomes effective on the effective date of the change in law or regulation with which the certificate does not comply, or if a separate label compliance date is given, on that date.
( b ) *Use of certificate during period of appeal.* If a certificate holder files a timely appeal after receipt of a decision to revoke a certificate pursuant to § 13.44, the holder may continue to use the certificate at issue until the effective date of a final decision issued by the appropriate TTB officer. However, the effective date of a notice of revocation by operation of law or regulations, issued pursuant to § 13.52, is not stayed pending the appeal.
[T.D. ATF-406, 64 FR 2129, Jan. 13, 1999, as amended by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
#### § 33.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(d)(2); 3809)
### §3007. Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule

#### (a) In general

The Commission shall compile and publish, at appropriate intervals, and keep up to date the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and related information in the form of printed copy; and, if, in its judgment, such format would serve the public interest and convenience—

(1) in the form of microfilm images; or

(2) in the form of electronic media.

#### (b) Content

Publications under subsection (a), in whatever format, shall contain—

(1) the then current Harmonized Tariff Schedule;

(2) statistical annotations and related statistical information formulated under section 1484(f) of this title; and

(3) such other matters as the Commission considers to be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes enumerated in the Preamble to the Convention.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1207, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1151; Pub. L. 104–295, §21(e)(10), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3531.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b)(1), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section 1202 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–295 substituted "1484(f)" for "1484(e)".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,194.80

 1,195.23

 1,195.31

 1,195.35

 1,195.39

 1,195.45

 1,195.67

 1,195.76

 1,195.81

 1,196.31

 1,196.62

 1,196.73

 1,196.88

 1,197.36

 1,197.82

 1,197.97

 1,198.09

 1,198.17

 1,198.23

 1,198.44

 1,198.63

 1,198.53

 1,198.45

 1,198.98

 1,198.94

 1,198.66

 1,198.54

 1,198.48

 1,198.81

 1,199.34

 1,198.83

 42.49

 43.19

 43.32

 43.39

 43.46

 43.56

 43.92

 44.07

 44.15

 44.99

 45.52

 45.71

 45.96

 46.79

 47.58

 47.84

 48.05

 48.20

 48.30

 48.67

 49.01

 48.83

 48.69

 49.63

 49.56

 49.06

 48.85

 48.75

 49.33

 50.28

 49.36

STORAGE

+0.26

+0.71

+0.13

+0.07

+0.07

+0.10

+0.37

+0.15

+0.08

+0.84

+0.53

+0.19

+0.26

+0.83

+0.80

+0.26

+0.21

+0.14

+0.11

+0.37

+0.34

-0.18

-0.14

+0.94

-0.07

-0.50

-0.21

-0.11

+0.58

+0.95

-0.92

CHANGE

133

357

71

37

37

54

189

80

46

425

268

98

131

422

407

134

109

75

210

345

519

154

96

1,278

713

135

144

141

859

1,911

132

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 155

 155

 347

 239

 164

 803

 744

 382

 248

 192

 563

 1,430

 589

SPILL

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

OUTLET

 0

 0

 2

 2

 1

 2

 3

 3

 2

 0

 1

 2

 0

 3

 4

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 2

 1

 0

 3

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .05

 .07

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

INCHES

 1.81

 2.11

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.93

 .18

 .00

 .20

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.07

 .72

 .01

 .19

 1.43

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.45

 1.15

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/02/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +7.16 9,710 62 6,011 39 .67 13.01

ACRE-FEET +7,160 19,260 123 11,923 77

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 11,923

OUTLET

TOTAL

 123

 12,046

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 13.01

JULY 1, 2003 16.98

 42.23
#### Commissioner of Public Welfare of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph Sturdivant, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12505 and <greek-i>12506]


California Disaster <greek-i>CA-00167

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 03/29/2011.
    Incident: Honshu Tsunami.
    Incident Period: 03/11/2011.
    Effective Date: 03/29/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/31/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Del Norte.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Humboldt, Siskiyou.
    Oregon: Curry, Josephine.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.563
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12505 E 
and for economic injury is 12506 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
California, Oregon.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-7953 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Opinion issued September 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00569-CV

———————————

IN RE BRITTANY HAINESWORTH, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Brittany Hainesworth,

1 has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

challenging the trial court’s order striking a hearing, set by relator, to “Set Aside 

Modify, and/or for Additional Temporary Orders” in the underlying suit affecting 

the parent-child relationship.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of M.J., II, a Minor Child, Cause No. 

103459-F, in the 461st District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable 

Patrick Bulanek presiding.
2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is only available in limited 

circumstances. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992). To be 

entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused 

its discretion and that no adequate remedy by appeal exists. See In re Kansas City 

S. Indus., Inc., 139 S.W.3d 669, 670 (Tex. 2004). “An appeal is inadequate when it 

comes too late to correct the [trial] court’s error without the loss of substantial rights 

to the complaining party.” Id.

Here, relator has failed to demonstrate that her “appellate remedy will cause 

the permanent loss of substantial rights.” Id. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8 (a), (d). All pending motions are 

dismissed as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Adams.