alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.(S)
1350, as adopted), I, Michael J. Ruane, Chief Financial Officer of SunGard Data
Systems Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge:

1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
     2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
     amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: March 28, 2003


/s/ Michael J. Ruane
------------------------------
Michael J. Ruane
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 75.700 Compliance with the U.S. Constitution, statutes, regulations, stated institutional policies, and applications.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70334, Aug. 29, 2024.

A grantee shall comply with § 75.500, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, and applications.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

[85 FR 59979, Sept. 23, 2020]
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chris Stringer, CFO of ActionView International,
  Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ActionView International,
  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of ActionView International, Inc.

Dated: April 16, 2007

/s/ Chris Stringer
  Chris Stringer, CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ActionView International,
  Inc. and will be retained by ActionView International, Inc. and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 19.685 Change in type of alcohol fuel plant. ( a ) *Small plants.* If the proprietor of a small plant intends to increase production (including receipts) to more than 10,000 proof gallons of spirits per calendar year, the proprietor must first obtain an amended permit by filing an application for a medium plant or a large plant, as appropriate, under §§ 19.675 or 19.676. If any of the required information is already on file with TTB, that information may be incorporated by reference in the new application. The proprietor must also provide a new or strengthening bond in accordance with §§ 19.699 and 19.700.
( b ) *Medium plants.* If the proprietor of a medium plant intends to increase production (including receipts) to more than 500,000 proof gallons of spirits per calendar year, the proprietor must first obtain an amended permit by filing an application for a large plant under § 19.676. If any of the required information is already on file with TTB, that information may be incorporated by reference in the new application. If the penal sum of the proprietor's current bond is below the amount specified for the new production level, the proprietor must obtain a new or strengthening bond in accordance with § 19.700.
( c ) *Curtailment of activities.* A proprietor of a medium or large plant who curtails operations to a level whereby the proprietor is eligible to requalify as a small or medium plant may so qualify by submitting a letterhead application to the appropriate TTB officer for approval. If the appropriate TTB officer approves the application, the proprietor automatically will be relieved of those regulatory requirements that apply only to the superseded qualification. In addition, in the case of a change to small plant status, the proprietor may be allowed to terminate the bond in accordance with the procedure set forth in § 19.170 of this part.
(26 U.S.C. 5181, 5271)
§ 76.656 Information in an application for a subgrant. An applicant for a subgrant shall include the following information in its application: ( a ) A description of how the applicant will meet the Federal requirements for participation of students enrolled in private schools.
( b ) The number of students enrolled in private schools who have been identified as eligible to benefits under the program.
( c ) The number of students enrolled in private schools who will receive benefits under the program.
( d ) The basis the applicant used to select the students.
( e ) The manner and extent to which the applicant complied with § 76.652 (consultation).
( f ) The places and times that the students will receive benefits under the program.
( g ) The differences, if any, between the program benefits the applicant will provide to public and private school students, and the reasons for the differences.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
NHTSA FRIA to OMB 3-5-10
News Release
 (ACUITYBRANDS LOGO)
    
    Acuity Brands, Inc.
1170 Peachtree Street, NE 
Suite 2400
Atlanta, GA 30309Tel: 404 853 1400
Fax: 404 853 1420AcuityBrands.com
 Company Contact:
Dan Smith
Acuity Brands, Inc.
(404) 853-1423
 ACUITY BRANDS
DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND
 ATLANTA, June 24, 2011
 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****NGA Chart: 81166          Scale: 75,270          Edition: 1          Edition Date: 01-APR-44          CORRECTED TO NTM:  1944/18**Notice Listing-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NGA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NGA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00085-CV

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

SMITHVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 53rd District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D-1-GN-17-004070

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Moseley,* JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

_______________________________

*Bailey C. Moseley, Retired, Sitting by Assignment
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed with this Court an agreed motion to set aside the trial court’s 

judgment out of Travis County,1 without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court 

for disposition in accordance with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties 

represent to this Court that they have reached a full and final settlement. In such a case, no real 

controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

We grant the motion. We set aside the judgment of the trial court without regard to the 

merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the 

parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

We dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 3, 2019

Date Decided: January 4, 2019

 1

Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court 

pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of 

any conflict between precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 41.3.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
June 25, 2011
 
 ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
  Delaware
    
    001-33347
    
    02-0579097(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1344 Crossman Ave.

Sunnyvale, CA 94089
 (408) 227-4500
 Not Applicable
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
 Appointment of Chief Financial Officer
    Compensatory Arrangements
  Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press release dated as of June 29, 2011, entitled Aruba
Networks, Inc. Names Seasoned Technology Industry Veterans as
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Worldwide Sales




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.Date: June 29, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Alexa KingAlexa KingVice President, Legal and General Counsel




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press release dated as of June 29, 2011, entitled Aruba
Networks, Inc. Names Seasoned Technology Industry Veterans as
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Worldwide Sales
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789789
<NAME> 86A.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         232,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,033
<PP&E>                                       7,084,599
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,634,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,557
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,727,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,366
<SALES>                                        843,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,324,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  583,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                741,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            741,771
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   741,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    72.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                               /s/ Timothy Hansen
                              -------------------
                              Timothy Hansen
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              September 17, 2004
(No. 35180.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Benton Satterfield, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed November 18, 1959*

Rehearing *denied Jan. 18, 1960.*

Mercer Cook, of Chicago, for plaintiff in error.

Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Benjamin S. Adamowski, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, ( Fred G. Leach, Assistant Attorney General, and Francis X. Riley, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Bristow

delivered the opinion of the court:

In the criminal court of Cook County, Benton Satterfield was found guilty of armed robbery by the court with*69out a jury and sentenced to the Illinois Penitentiary for a minimum of one year and a maximum of ten years. On trial with defendant at the same time was Will Hill, an alleged confederate, who was given a like sentence but does not join in this review on writ of error.

The prosecuting witness, Willie F. Godfrey, on January 10, 1957, was the owner of a small delicatessen store located at 3982 Cottage Grove Avenue, Chicago. On that date at 6:3o in the evening three men entered his store, ordered lunch meat, then drawing a gun demanded, the money in the cash register and his pocketbook which amounted to about $25.

Subsequently Satterfield and Hill were arrested and later, on January 21, were identified by Godfrey as two of the three that had invaded-.his premises. Both defendants testified and insisted throughout that they were not guilty; that they did not know Godfrey and had never visited his store.

The defendants went to extremes in their sweeping protestation of innocence. They said that they had never known each other. This was shown to be utterly untrue. Horace T. Harris testified for the State that during the period in question he had employed Satterfield as a delivery man in his refrigeration business, which was located at 3859 Cottage Grove Avenue, and that he had seen Hill and Satterfield together many times. This testimony no doubt strongly influenced the court in his determination that the defendant was guilty.

At the conclusion of the trial, the court recalled the prosecuting witness and these questions and answers followed :

“Mr. Godfrey, are you sure that these two men are two of the three men who held up your store ?

Mr. Godfrey: I am, sir.

.The Court: You are? ■

Mr. Godfrey: I am sure,”

*70A reading of this record leaves no doubt that defendant was proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that his sentence of one to ten years was a fair one. The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 99.12 What limitations exist on the right to inspect and review records? ( a ) If the education records of a student contain information on more than one student, the parent or eligible student may inspect and review or be informed of only the specific information about that student.
( b ) A postsecondary institution does not have to permit a student to inspect and review education records that are: ( 1 ) Financial records, including any information those records contain, of his or her parents;
( 2 ) Confidential letters and confidential statements of recommendation placed in the education records of the student before January 1, 1975, as long as the statements are used only for the purposes for which they were specifically intended; and
( 3 ) Confidential letters and confidential statements of recommendation placed in the student's education records after January 1, 1975, if: ( i ) The student has waived his or her right to inspect and review those letters and statements; and
( ii ) Those letters and statements are related to the student's: ( A ) Admission to an educational institution;
( B ) Application for employment; or
( C ) Receipt of an honor or honorary recognition.
( c ) ( 1 ) A waiver under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section is valid only if: ( i ) The educational agency or institution does not require the waiver as a condition for admission to or receipt of a service or benefit from the agency or institution; and
( ii ) The waiver is made in writing and signed by the student, regardless of age.
( 2 ) If a student has waived his or her rights under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the educational institution shall: ( i ) Give the student, on request, the names of the individuals who provided the letters and statements of recommendation; and
( ii ) Use the letters and statements of recommendation only for the purpose for which they were intended.
( 3 ) ( i ) A waiver under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section may be revoked with respect to any actions occurring after the revocation.
( ii ) A revocation under paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section must be in writing.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(1) (A), (B), (C), and (D))
[53 FR 11943, Apr. 11, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 59296, Nov. 21, 1996]
§ 690.75 Determination of eligibility for payment. ( a ) For each payment period, an institution may pay a Federal Pell Grant to an eligible student only after it determines that the student— ( 1 ) Qualifies as an eligible student under 34 CFR Part 668, Subpart C;
( 2 ) Is enrolled in an eligible program as an undergraduate student; and
( 3 ) If enrolled in a credit hour program without terms or a clock hour program, has completed the payment period as defined in § 668.4 for which he or she has been paid a Federal Pell Grant.
( b ) If an institution determines at the beginning of a payment period that a student is not maintaining satisfactory progress, but reverses that determination before the end of the payment period, the institution may pay a Federal Pell Grant to the student for the entire payment period.
( c ) If an institution determines at the beginning of a payment period that a student is not maintaining satisfactory progress, but reverses that determination after the end of the payment period, the institution may neither pay the student a Federal Pell Grant for that payment period nor make adjustments in subsequent Federal Pell Grant payments to compensate for the loss of aid for that period.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0681) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a)
[52 FR 45736, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 56916, Nov. 6, 1991; 59 FR 54730, 54735, Nov. 1, 1994; 60 FR 30789, June 12, 1995; 61 FR 60397, Nov. 27, 1996; 61 FR 60610, Nov. 29, 1996; 65 FR 65676, Nov. 1, 2000; 67 FR 67083, Nov. 1, 2002; 85 FR 49828, Aug. 14, 2020]
FILED: June 5 , 202 3

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 4164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

– Appellee

,

v.

TAHJI ANTONIO ELEY

Defendant

– Appellant

.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed June 2 , 202 3 , as follows:

On page 7, in the final sentence, the word “according” is corrected to “accordingly.”

For the Court

– By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor , Clerk USCA4 Appeal: 21-4164 Doc: 40 Filed: 06/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 1
#### Norman Stark, Respondent, v. Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### Ila D. Shewman, Respondent, v. Carl Frey et al., Appellants.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### § 76.201 A State plan must meet all statutory and regulatory requirements.

The Secretary approves a State plan if it meets the requirements of the Federal statutes and regulations that apply to the plan.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
### §742j–2. Uniform allowance

Notwithstanding subsection 1 5901(a) of title 5, the uniform allowance for each uniformed employee of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service may be up to $400 annually.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, §14, as added Pub. L. 96–291, §2, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 608.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "section".
#### § 663.8 Severability.

If any provision of this part or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the part or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice will not be affected thereby.

[88 FR 85507, Dec. 8, 2023]
§ 668.232 Program eligibility. An institution that offers a comprehensive transition and postsecondary program must apply to the Secretary to have the program determined to be an eligible program. The institution applies under the provisions in 34 CFR 600.20 for adding an educational program, and must include in its application— ( a ) A detailed description of the comprehensive transition and postsecondary program that addresses all of the components of the program, as defined in § 668.231;
( b ) The institution's policy for determining whether a student enrolled in the program is making satisfactory academic progress;
( c ) The number of weeks of instructional time and the number of semester or quarter credit hours or clock hours in the program, including the equivalent credit or clock hours associated with noncredit or reduced credit courses or activities;
( d ) A description of the educational credential offered (*e.g.,* degree or certificate) or identified outcome or outcomes established by the institution for all students enrolled in the program;
( e ) A copy of the letter or notice sent to the institution's accrediting agency informing the agency of its comprehensive transition and postsecondary program. The letter or notice must include a description of the items in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section; and
( f ) Any other information the Secretary may require.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-NEW4) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091)