alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 19.201 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the following terms have the meanings indicated:

*Dealer.* A person that sells, or offers for sale, any alcohol product (distilled spirits, wines, and/or beer) fit for beverage use.

*Retail dealer in liquors.* A dealer that sells, or offers for sale, distilled spirits, wines, or beer to any person other than a dealer.

*Wholesale dealer in liquors.* A dealer that sells, or offers for sale, distilled spirits, wines, or beer to another dealer.

(26 U.S.C. 5121, 5122)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00490-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.H. JR., a Child

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVPC-21-0000219

Honorable Robert J. Falkenberg, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was due on October 12, 2022, and appellee filed an unopposed motion 

requesting a sixteen-day extension of time on October 11, 2022. After consideration, we grant

the motion and order appellee to file its brief by October 28, 2022.

It is so ORDERED on October 13, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
### §1650. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §650, 46 Stat. 762, is set out as a part of section 2072 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,442

 3,665

 4,246

 4,394

 3,894

 4,150

 5,561

 5,309

 3,960

 4,685

 4,318

 3,169

 4,255

 4,397

 3,710

 4,732

 6,378

 6,563

 7,904

 7,374

 7,781

 6,714

 7,093

 5,590

 6,749

 4,036

 5,012

 5,058

 4,965

 5,003

 5,912

 602

 555

 578

 618

 565

 503

 627

 821

 620

 437

 528

 434

 512

 509

 605

 746

 685

 851

 936

 941

 968

 895

 974

 765

 1,103

 720

 822

 831

 1,189

 1,081

 894

 1,563

 1,676

 1,918

 1,994

 1,831

 2,087

 2,425

 2,596

 1,808

 2,133

 1,545

 1,567

 1,942

 1,940

 1,932

 2,195

 2,636

 3,035

 3,356

 3,594

 3,695

 3,524

 3,707

 3,487

 3,048

 1,956

 2,605

 2,807

 2,879

 2,867

 2,797

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 22,028

 22,202

 22,747

 23,279

 23,491

 23,782

 24,519

 25,362

 25,606

 26,283

 26,473

 26,563

 26,764

 27,025

 27,394

 27,913

 28,631

 29,672

 31,197

 32,704

 33,974

 34,902

 36,801

 38,155

 39,658

 40,047

 40,710

 41,577

 42,524

 43,196

 43,357

 1,573

 1,586

 1,625

 1,663

 1,678

 1,699

 1,751

 1,812

 1,829

 1,877

 1,891

 1,897

 1,912

 1,930

 1,957

 1,994

 2,045

 2,119

 2,228

 2,336

 2,427

 2,493

 2,629

 2,725

 2,833

 2,861

 2,908

 2,970

 3,037

 3,085

 3,097

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 19.92 Information required in application for operating permit. ( a ) In order to obtain an operating permit, a person must complete an application on form TTB F 5110.25, Application for Operating Permit Under 26 U.S.C. 5171(d). TTB will consider all written statements, affidavits and other documents submitted in support of the application as part of the application.
( b ) The application on TTB F 5110.25 must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and principal address of the business;
( 2 ) The address of the plant if different from the business address;
( 3 ) A description of the operation(s) to be conducted;
( 4 ) A statement of the business organization and the persons involved in the business as required under § 19.93; and
( 5 ) A list of trade names as required under § 19.94.
( c ) A TTB officer may request that any person listed under § 19.93(a)(1)(ii), (a)(3)(iii), (b)(1), or (b)(2) submit to TTB a statement as to whether that person has ever: ( 1 ) Been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor under Federal or State law, other than a misdemeanor conviction for a traffic violation;
( 2 ) Been arrested or charged with any violation of State or Federal law, other than an arrest or charge for a misdemeanor traffic violation; or
( 3 ) Applied for, held, or been connected with a permit issued under Federal law to manufacture, distribute, sell or use spirits or products containing spirits, or held any financial interest in any business covered by any such permit, and if so, give the permit number, classification, period of operation and details regarding any denial, suspension, revocation or other termination.
( d ) If any of the information required in paragraphs (b)(4) or (c)(3) of this section is on file with the appropriate TTB officer, the applicant may, by incorporation by reference, state that the information is made a part of the application for an operating permit.
( e ) The applicant must provide any additional information that the appropriate TTB officer may request in order to determine whether the application should be approved.
(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5271)
#### § 19.436 Taxpayment of samples.

When a proprietor is required to pay tax on samples under § 19.434(f), the proprietor may include the tax on the next semimonthly or quarterly tax return, as appropriate, if qualified to defer payment of tax. If a proprietor is not qualified to defer payment of tax, the proprietor must prepay the tax on form TTB F 5000.24. See subpart I of this part for rules regarding the payment of taxes.

(26 U.S.C. 5005, 5061)
### Geology of the Curlew quadrangle, Ferry County, Washington

By: Raymond Laurence ParkerJames Alfred Calkins

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1169

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the Curlew quadrangle, Ferry County, Washington(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,182.21

 1,182.28

 1,182.36

 1,182.67

 1,186.17

 1,186.78

 1,186.98

 1,187.19

 1,187.99

 1,188.39

 1,188.75

 1,188.97

 1,189.33

 1,189.57

 1,189.79

 1,189.98

 1,190.15

 1,190.37

 1,190.59

 1,190.81

 1,191.00

 1,191.33

 1,191.57

 1,191.87

 1,192.27

 1,196.25

 1,197.94

 1,198.79

 1,198.58

 1,198.46

 1,198.38

 24.87

 24.95

 25.05

 25.41

 29.78

 30.59

 30.85

 31.14

 32.23

 32.79

 33.29

 33.60

 34.11

 34.46

 34.77

 35.05

 35.30

 35.62

 35.94

 36.27

 36.55

 37.05

 37.41

 37.86

 38.48

 44.89

 47.79

 49.29

 48.92

 48.71

 48.57

STORAGE

+0.10

+0.08

+0.10

+0.37

+4.37

+0.81

+0.27

+0.29

+1.09

+0.56

+0.50

+0.31

+0.52

+0.35

+0.32

+0.27

+0.25

+0.32

+0.32

+0.32

+0.28

+0.50

+0.36

+0.45

+0.61

+6.42

+2.90

+1.50

-0.37

-0.21

-0.14

CHANGE

51

44

52

186

2,202

409

136

145

550

283

255

156

262

177

161

144

134

167

167

164

142

252

184

229

312

3,236

1,463

1,295

109

68

38

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 537

 292

 173

 107

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 2

 2

 3

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 2

 1

 5

 7

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 3

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .06

 .04

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .10

 .15

 .06

 .06

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .60

 .81

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .75

 .14

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .31

 .42

 .48

 3.60

 .50

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2008 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/08/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +23.82 13,173 31 1,109 36 .83 8.13

ACRE-FEET +23,820 26,129 61 2,200 71

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 2,200

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 2,261

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.13

JULY 1, 2007 9.99

 24.77
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 347

 345

 339

 344

 341

 336

 336

 335

 332

 330

 331

 331

 324

 325

 317

 314

 306

 302

 301

 297

 295

 297

 295

 293

 289

 285

 280

 277

 279

 278

 332

 317

 332

 326

 326

 317

 324

 322

 319

 314

 308

 304

 297

 296

 293

 282

 276

 281

 282

 278

 276

 277

 274

 265

 258

 253

 254

 253

 252

 251

 340

 336

 335

 333

 333

 329

 328

 327

 324

 324

 319

 318

 314

 312

 308

 301

 295

 294

 293

 290

 288

 288

 287

 284

 280

 275

 272

 270

 268

 266

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Writ of Prohibition, and Writ of Injunction

Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 28 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00185- CV

IN RE SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Co unty Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1123898


### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 7 , 2019, relator San Jacinto River Authority filed a petition for writ of m andamus , a writ of prohibition, or a writ of injunction in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable George Barnstone , presiding2

judge of the Co unty Civil C ourt at Law No

. 1 of Harris County , to vacate his February 26, 2019 order denying relator’s motion to dismiss, and d ismiss the suit

. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief, asking our court to stay proceedings in the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10. With certain exceptions not applicable here, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). This court has jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition to protect its jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a). “A writ of prohibition may be granted to prevent interference with higher courts in deciding a pending appeal.” In re Harper , No. 14- 11 -00657-CV, 2011 WL 3667871, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 23, 2011, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.)

. “This court should exercise great caution before issuing a writ of prohibition.” Id

. “A party seeking a writ of prohibition must show (1) that it has no other adequate remedy at law, and (2) that it is clearly entitled to the relief sought.” In re Walker , No. 14

- 18

- 01078-CV, 2018 WL 6684309, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 20, 2018, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). The purpose of a writ of injunction is to enforce or protect the appellate court’ s jurisdiction. In re Olson , 252 S.W.3d 747, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2 008, orig. proceeding). “The threat of jurisdictional interference must be real; the writ will not issue to prevent the mere possibility of interference .” Wilson v.3

Woodland Hills Apartments , No. 05

- 15 -01369-CV, 2017 WL 526609, at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 9, 2017, pet. denied). “The issuance of an extraordinary writ, such as a writ of injunction, is not authorized when there is another adequate remedy.” In re Walker , 2018 WL 6684309, at * 1.

Relator has not established that it is entitled to a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of injunction. We therefore deny relator ’s pe tition and motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot

.
(No. 73—CC—30

#### James R. Erlenbaugh, d/b/a James Ambulance Service, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 22, 1973.*

James R. Erlenbaugh, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 25, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

Date: November 3, 2004

                                         /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Name:    A. Roland Thomas
                                         Title:   President and Chief
                                                  Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.4 Letter Agreement Lindon Robertson


Exhibit 10.4





June 4, 2015


Lindon G. Robertson


Dear Lindon:
This letter is intended to modify and amend the offer letter dated September 4, 2013 (the “Offer Letter”) between Brooks Automation, Inc. (“Brooks”) and you.  In light of your continued performance in the senior executive role as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Brooks has agreed to modify certain terms of offer letter relating to your eligibility for salary continuation in the event there is a termination of your employment as set forth below.
The second bulleted paragraph of Section 5 of the Offer Letter is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following new bulleted paragraphs:


		
	•
	“If Brooks terminates your employment without “cause” (as defined in Brooks’ equity grant documents), or you terminate your employment for “good reason” (as defined below), you will be eligible for salary continuation payments at your then current base salary for a period of twelve months from your termination date.  If you have not secured employment following the initial 12 months of salary continuation, Brooks will continue your salary on a bi-weekly basis for up to 12 additional months while you are not employed.  In addition, you will continue to be covered under the Company’s medical, dental and vision plans at the same contribution level as current active employees while you are receiving salary continuation payments.  Any salary continuation or benefits will be conditioned upon your signing the Company’s customary Separation Agreement and Waiver of Claims.  For the sake of clarity, the salary continuation benefits described above shall not apply to any termination of employment that triggers a payment to you under the Change in Control Agreement dated as of June 2, 2015 between you and the Company.




		
	•
	For purposes hereof, “good reason” shall mean, without your express written consent, the occurrence of any of the following:  (i) a material breach by the Company of any agreement that exists between you and the Company; (ii) a diminution of your responsibilities and authority resulting in responsibilities and authority in material respects inconsistent with the responsibilities and authority of the role of Executive Vice Presidnet and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; (iii) a reduction of your base salary or of any material employee benefit enjoyed by you unless all senior executives of the Company suffer a substantially similar reduction; or (iv) a relocation of your office to a location more than 60 miles from the Company’s headquarters in Chelmsford, Massachusetts.”




Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions contained in your Offer Letter remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter by signing and returning a copy hereof.
Sincerely yours,




William T. Montone
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
#### § 19.645 Notice of permanent discontinuance of business.

If the proprietor of a vinegar plant decides to permanently discontinue operations, the proprietor must so notify the appropriate TTB officer in writing. The proprietor must include in the notice a statement regarding the status of each still.

(26 U.S.C. 5502)
### §917c. Negotiations with Mexico and Canada

The Secretary of Commerce, through the Secretary of State, shall immediately initiate negotiations for the purpose of developing appropriate bilateral agreements with Mexico and Canada for the protection and conservation of whales.

(Pub. L. 94–532, §5, Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2492.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

[LETTERHEAD]

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Neil S. Novich, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ryerson Inc. (the Company), state and certify that this Form 10-K
Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-K Annual Report for the period
ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil S. Novich                           
|Neil S. Novich                               
|Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                
|March 12, 2007
December 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER PUMPING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHAN

GE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET PLANT C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

483.2

1 414.09 480.9 -2.3 915 1,490 0 508 91 3 0.01 0.00

2 413.84 479.0 -1.9 1,163 1,535 5 508 90 0 0.00 0.19

3 413.67 477.6 -1.3 1,213 1,267 0 508 88 10 0.04 0.00

4 413.40 475.6 -2.1 899 1,329 2 508 96 13 0.05 0.00

5 413.10 473.3 -2.3 923 1,472 0 508 95 13 0.05 0.00

6 412.93 471.9 -1.3 1,124 1,230 0 506 46 0 0.00 0.22

7 412.64 469.7 -2.2 1,081 1,578 0 506 103 10 0.04 0.07

8 412.42 468.1 -1.7 1,154 1,431 4 506 41 18 0.07 0.00

9 412.26 466.8 -1.2 1,274 1,517 2 294 59 18 0.07 0.00

10 412.04 465.2 -1.7 1,306 2,084 0 0 58 10 0.04 0.00

11 411.81 463.4 -1.7 1,087 1,889 0 0 68 8 0.03 0.00

12 411.50 461.1 -2.3 729 1,830 0 0 70 10 0.04 0.00

13 411.17 458.6 -2.5 1,027 2,196 0 0 78 10 0.04 0.00

14 411.00 457.3 -1.3 1,444 1,997 0 0 82 13 0.05 0.00

15 410.87 456.3 -1.0 1,578 1,970 0 0 86 13 0.05 0.00

16 410.87 456.3 0.0 1,993 1,893 0 0 87 13 0.05 0.00

17 410.89 456.5 0.2 2,122 1,946 0 0 85 15 0.06 0.10

18 410.92 456.7 0.2 2,143 1,914 0 0 83 33 0.13 0.72

19 411.18 458.7 2.0 3,044 1,975 0 0 82 0 0.00 0.50

20 411.76 463.0 4.4 4,238 1,947 0 0 81 0 0.00 0.10

21 411.94 464.4 1.4 2,719 1,952 0 0 76 5 0.02 0.00

22 412.02 465.0 0.6 2,301 1,910 0 0 75 10 0.04 0.00

23 412.02 465.0 0.0 1,983 1,900 0 0 73 10 0.04 0.00

24 412.03 465.1 0.1 2,125 1,938 0 0 72 77 0.30 0.00

25 412.07 465.4 0.3 2,307 2,070 0 0 73 10 0.04 0.00

26 412.06 465.3 -0.1 2,150 2,110 0 0 73 5 0.02 0.00

27 412.00 464.9 -0.5 1,803 1,960 0 0 74 0 0.00 0.34

28 411.96 464.6 -0.3 2,065 2,143 0 0 71 3 0.01 0.00

29 411.92 464.2 -0.3 1,825 1,902 0 0 70 5 0.02 0.03

30 412.01 464.9 0.7 2,345 1,931 0 0 71 0 0.00 0.56

31 412.03 465.1 0.2 1,993 1,838 0 0 73 5 0.02 0.00

TOTALS -17.9 54,073 56,144 13 4,352 2,370 340 1.33 2.83

ACRE-FEET -

17,900

107,254 111,362 26 8,632 4,701 674

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 111,362 Outlet 8,632

Spill 26 Pumping Plant 4,701

Total = 124,720

Precipitation

This month = 2.83

October 01, 2023 To date = 4.94

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Folsom Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/10/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 508

 416

 461

 497

 489

 514

 509

 491

 480

 462

 455

 455

 457

 464

 463

 465

 466

 469

 463

 461

 462

 464

 467

 467

 472

 468

 472

 467

 472

 474

 477

 408

 392

 399

 420

 427

 486

 474

 468

 453

 434

 432

 435

 428

 399

 423

 429

 446

 454

 453

 452

 453

 455

 455

 459

 460

 459

 460

 459

 459

 458

 468

 479

 405

 426

 455

 450

 500

 488

 481

 471

 450

 443

 444

 440

 437

 445

 445

 453

 461

 459

 457

 458

 460

 460

 462

 464

 465

 465

 464

 465

 465

 473

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 312

 266

 279

 297

 294

 325

 318

 313

 307

 294

 290

 290

 288

 286

 291

 291

 296

 301

 300

 298

 299

 300

 300

 302

 303

 303

 303

 303

 303

 303

 308

TOTAL 14,190

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 682.611 [Reserved]