alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 309

 329

 319

 264

 255

 228

 217

 247

 250

 207

 219

 207

 191

 191

 188

 192

 198

 197

 200

 218

 235

 218

 271

 235

 234

 222

 219

 194

 397

 498

 171

 173

 174

 172

 173

 174

 174

 172

 169

 164

 164

 164

 163

 156

 169

 171

 171

 167

 171

 170

 172

 174

 177

 177

 175

 173

 169

 161

 158

 164

 192

 194

 196

 191

 188

 186

 183

 184

 185

 179

 180

 174

 174

 177

 177

 178

 180

 181

 183

 184

 187

 185

 193

 196

 199

 185

 182

 172

 199

 205

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,770

 2,779

 2,787

 2,799

 2,809

 2,805

 2,777

 2,733

 2,701

 2,664

 2,640

 2,622

 2,602

 2,583

 2,568

 2,552

 2,536

 2,526

 2,521

 2,519

 2,523

 2,524

 2,532

 2,549

 2,568

 2,579

 2,587

 2,582

 2,604

 2,631

 198

 199

 199

 200

 201

 200

 198

 195

 193

 190

 189

 187

 186

 185

 183

 182

 181

 180

 180

 180

 180

 180

 181

 182

 183

 184

 185

 184

 186

 188

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 668.149 Special provisions for the approval of assessment procedures for individuals with disabilities. If no test is reasonably available for individuals with disabilities so that no test can be approved under §§ 668.146 or 668.148 for these individuals, the following procedures apply: ( a ) The Secretary considers a modified test or testing procedure, or instrument that has been scientifically developed specifically for the purpose of evaluating the ability to benefit from postsecondary training or education of individuals with disabilities to be an approved test for purposes of this subpart provided that the testing procedure or instrument measures both basic verbal and quantitative skills at the secondary school level.
( b ) The Secretary considers the passing scores for these testing procedures or instruments to be those recommended by the test publisher or State, as applicable.
( c ) The test publisher or State, as applicable, must— ( 1 ) Maintain appropriate documentation, including a description of the procedures or instruments, their content domains, technical properties, and scoring procedures; and
( 2 ) Require the test administrator to— ( i ) Use the procedures or instruments in accordance with instructions provided by the test publisher or State, as applicable; and
( ii ) Use the passing scores recommended by the test publisher or State, as applicable.
Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0049) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091(d))
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

November 18, 2008 Michael 

### H. Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 28 15 Sacramento,CA 95812 

# vfl
Dear

# 'On October 20,2008, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they hlfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix V.

Printed on Recycled Papcr APCDIAQMD Rule # Rule Title Antelope Valley 465 Vacuum Producing Devices Or Systems (rescinded) Antelope Valley 466 Pumps And Compressors (rescinded) Antelope Valley 466.1 Valves And Flanges (rescinded) Antelope Valley 467 Pressure Relief Devices (rescinded) Antelope Valley Mojave Desert Mojave Desert Mojave Desert 1173 203.1 203.2 213 Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds Special Permit Provisions (rescinded) Eligibilityof Compensatory (rescinded) Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality Impact (rescinded) Mojave Desert 2 13.1 Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality Impact (rescinded) Mojave Desert 213.2 Definitions for Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.3 Mojave Desert 2 13.3 Additional Standards for Permits to Construct and

Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara County 202 333
339 Exemptions to Rule 201 Control of Emissions from Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Motor Vehcle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

### This addresses all revisions in this submittal.

### In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k). Questions regardingour completenessreview should be directed to Cynthia F.Allen at (415) 947-4120. Sincerely,

Director,Air Division Cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Director Antelope Valley AQMD Mojave Desert AQMD
Mr. TerryDressler, APCO Santa Barbara CountyAPCD
Mr. Jorge 

### L. Fernandez, Chief Program Evaluation Branch, CARB
### §2554. Procedure after finding by international forum

#### (a) In general

If an appropriate international forum finds that a standards-related activity being engaged in within the United States conflicts with the obligations of the United States under the Agreement, the interagency trade organization established under section 1872(a) of this title shall review the finding and the matters related thereto with a view to recommending appropriate action.

#### (b) Cross reference

**For provisions of law regarding remedies available to domestic persons alleging that standards activities engaged in by Parties to the Agreement (other than the United States) violate the obligations of the Agreement, see section 2411 of this title.**

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §424, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 248.)
#### § 19.221 Scope.

This subpart covers the taxation of distilled spirits and the procedures for payment of taxes by proprietors of distilled spirits plants. Issues covered in this subpart include tax rates, liability for tax, tax determination, return periods, filing of tax returns, forms of payment, electronic fund transfers, and credits under 26 U.S.C. 5010.

(26 U.S.C. 5001)
R 15 W R 14 W R 13 W R 12 W 

914
 

914
 

T 3 N 914
 

36 31
 36 31
 31

36 31
 36
 914 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

1 6

1 6 7706
 Bureau of Land Management 6
 1
 6
 1 6 923
 

913
 

10506
 

913
 913
 

T 2 N 

10508 20339
 
 20298
 

Missoula 20300
 10508
 Butte Field Office 20339
 

20451
 

Field Office 

36 31 43
 Draft RMP/EIS 36 31
 

10515 36 31 20339 36 31 20339
 

1 6
 1 6
 1 6 20365 20454
 1
 6

20454
 20318
 20457
 

20457
 

351
 

Grazing Allotment Map 6
 20454
 

20453 20457
 

351 Wisdom, Montana Quad 20454
 

20453
 T 1 N 

20456
 

20364
 20219
 10541
 

36 31 20462
 36
 31
 Butte Field Office 

31 36
 

20352
 

1 6
 1
 

1
 6
 

T 1 S 20341
 

Dillon 

Field Office 

Miles
 

0 50 100
 

Map shows existing grazing allotments found 

within the boundaries of the Wisdom, Montana 

1:100,000 USGS topographic map series 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 IDAHO 

Universal Transverse Mercator NAD 27 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification. 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Private 1 inch equals 1.58 miles Allotment Boundary 

Field Office Boundary Bureau of Reclamation State Miles 

Interstate 0 10 20
 

Local Government US Fish and Wildlife Service US Route
 

MT Route 

National Park Service (NPS) US Forest Service (USFS) MT Secondary 

Road 

Other Federal Land Water
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,412

 7,030

 8,347

 8,746

 8,195

 7,878

 7,966

 7,438

 7,194

 6,284

 6,017

 6,046

 5,647

 5,997

 6,914

 7,047

 7,803

 7,519

 6,940

 7,343

 6,450

 4,713

 3,949

 4,601

 5,238

 4,737

 4,470

 5,145

 5,799

 5,985

 6,982

 769

 1,161

 1,280

 966

 690

 572

 581

 734

 727

 719

 823

 750

 939

 1,024

 1,000

 855

 871

 871

 661

 677

 547

 477

 645

 656

 861

 810

 911

 678

 537

 754

 935

 2,826

 3,686

 4,367

 4,538

 3,919

 3,878

 3,747

 3,607

 3,732

 3,635

 3,491

 3,251

 3,036

 3,039

 3,523

 3,643

 4,016

 3,896

 3,600

 3,642

 3,296

 2,492

 2,185

 2,521

 2,628

 2,651

 2,302

 2,152

 2,378

 2,855

 3,303

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 39,264

 40,567

 42,014

 43,145

 43,215

 44,105

 44,703

 44,772

 45,430

 46,768

 48,428

 49,237

 49,889

 50,752

 51,449

 51,406

 51,055

 50,413

 50,094

 49,858

 49,407

 48,292

 46,745

 45,631

 44,768

 44,168

 43,434

 42,547

 41,402

 40,614

 39,901

 2,805

 2,898

 3,001

 3,082

 3,087

 3,150

 3,193

 3,198

 3,245

 3,341

 3,459

 3,517

 3,564

 3,625

 3,675

 3,672

 3,647

 3,601

 3,578

 3,561

 3,529

 3,449

 3,339

 3,259

 3,198

 3,155

 3,102

 3,039

 2,957

 2,901

 2,850

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 76.51 A State distributes funds by formula or competition. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70335 , Aug. 29, 2024.
If a program statute authorizes a State to make subgrants, the statute: ( a ) Requires the State to use a formula to distribute funds;
( b ) Gives the State discretion to select subgrantees through a competition among the applicants or through some other procedure; or
( c ) Allows some combination of these procedures.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 6511(a))
[45 FR 22517, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 21776, May 19, 1989]
### SUBCHAPTER B—FINES

#### SUBCHAPTER B—FINES 1

Sec.
3611.
Payment of a fine or restitution.
3612.
Collection of an unpaid fine or restitution. 2

3613.
Civil remedies for satisfaction of an unpaid fine.
3613A.
Effect of default.
3614.
Resentencing upon failure to pay a fine or restitution.
3615.
Criminal default.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–132, title II, §207(d), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1240, amended table of sections generally, inserting "or restitution" after "fine" in items 3611, 3612, and 3614, reenacting items 3613 and 3615 without change, and adding item 3613A.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330010(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2143, transferred analysis of this subchapter to follow heading for this subchapter.

1  So in original. Probably should not appear.

2  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
!(

!( !(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Mount Joy Wire

Horsehead - Palmerton

Exide Tech - Reading Smelter

PPL - Montour

Schott NA - Duryea

Horsehead - Monaca Smelter

EME - Homer City

Allegheny Ludlum - Latrobe

East Penn Mfg - Battery Assembly First Energy - Bruce Mansfield

US Dept of Defense - Letterkenny

ELK

TIOGA

ERIE

YORK

CENTRE

POTTER

BERKS

PIKE LYCOMING

MCKEAN

WAYNE

BRADFORD WARREN

CLINTON

BEDFORD

INDIANA

BUTLER

LUZERNE

SOMERSET

CLEARFIELD

BLAIR

FAYETTE

CRAWFORD

BUCKS

LANCASTER

PERRY

MERCER

CHESTER

FRANKLIN

CAMBRIA

ADAMS

VENANGO

MONROE

CLARION

GREENE

HUNTINGDON

SCHUYLKILL

WASHINGTON

ALLEGHENY

DAUPHIN

WESTMORELAND

BEAVER

JEFFERSON

FULTON

SUSQUEHANNA

FOREST

MIFFLIN

ARMSTRONG

UNION

JUNIATA

SULLIVAN

COLUMBIA

LEHIGH

CARBON

WYOMING

SNYDER

CAMERON

CUMBERLAND

LEBANON

LACKAWANNA

MONTGOMERY

LAWRENCE

NORTHUMBERLAND

NORTHAMPTON

DELAWARE

MONTOUR

PHILADELPHIA

!( Lead Sources (Based on 2010 PA DEP AIMS Data)

Pennsylvania Lead Sources

0.5 Tons per Year and Greater
### List of **Attendees via Phone/In Person**

**Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Heat and Hot Environments**  **: Revised Criteria CDC/NIOSH Robert A. Taft Laboratories**  **4676 Columbia Parkway, 1 st**  

### Floor, Auditorium

**Cincinnati, OH February 13, 2014** 

**Name Affiliation**  **Presenter** 1. Margaret Wan EOH Consulting 2. Judith Eisenberg CDC/NIOSH 3. W. Jon Williams CDC/NIOSH 4. Tom Bernard University of South Florida 5. Kristin Musolin CDC/NIOSH 6. Todd Niemeier CDC/NIOSH 7. T. J. L entz CDC/NIOSH 8. Shannon Berg CDC/NIOSH 9. John Muller US Navy (Department of Defense) 10. Naomi Hudson CDC/NIOSH 11. Patrick Mazza Southwest Airlines 12. Rebecca Guerin CDC/NIOSH 13. Rachel Ullah CDC/NIOSH 14. Rosemary

Sokas Georgetown University 15. Brenda Jacklitsch CDC/NIOSH Presenter 16. Stephanie Pendergrass CDC/NIOSH 17. Paul Schulte CDC/NIOSH 18. Kathleen MacMahon CDC/NIOSH 19. Laural ynn McKernan CDC/NIOSH
§ 19.17 Detention of containers. ( a ) *General.* A TTB officer may detain any container containing, or supposed to contain, spirits when the appropriate TTB officer believes that the required tax on those spirits has not been paid or determined or that the removal of the container is in violation of law or the provisions of this part. The appropriate TTB officer will hold the container at a safe place until it is determined whether the detained property is subject to forfeiture.
( b ) *Limitation.* A detention under paragraph (a) of this section may not exceed 72 hours without process of law or intervention of the appropriate TTB officer. However, the detained container may be kept on the premises beyond the 72-hour period without process of law or intervention if the person possessing the container immediately before its detention executes a waiver of this 72-hour limitation on detention of the container.
(26 U.S.C. 5311)
#### In the Matter of Disbarment Proceedings against Walter M. Reynolds, an Attorney and Counselor at Law.

Order of disbarment entered, striking the name of the said Walter M. Reynolds from the roll of attar-neys and counselors at law, and the said attorney forbidden to practice as such in any of the courts of this State. All concurred.
(No. 6615

#### Ace Hardware No. 156, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 10, 1972.*

Ace Hardware No. 156, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

February 2004

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Feb-04 12 12 24 120 0 0 0 23 4722 4355 9078 9367 8639 18006

2-Feb-04 22 12 34 97 1 0 1 23 4678 4296 8974 9278 8522 17800

3-Feb-04 15 0 15 85 6 0 6 22 4036 4272 8308 8005 8473 16478

4-Feb-04 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 16 3537 3821 7358 7016 7578 14594

5-Feb-04 9 12 21 64 0 0 0 12 5916 4325 10241 11734 8579 20313

6-Feb-04 3 0 3 55 3 12 15 9 5037 4319 9356 9991 8566 18557

7-Feb-04 0 0 0 44 0 12 12 9 5143 3827 8970 10201 7591 17792

8-Feb-04 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 7 6327 3674 10001 12550 7287 19837

9-Feb-04 6 0 6 35 7 0 7 6 6503 3656 10159 12899 7252 20151

10-Feb-04 9 0 9 31 0 12 12 6 6252 3658 9910 12401 7256 19657

11-Feb-04 0 0 0 29 0 24 24 8 6372 3705 10077 12639 7349 19988

12-Feb-04 0 0 0 23 15 0 15 7 6369 3706 10075 12633 7351 19984

13-Feb-04 0 12 12 15 24 0 24 8 6376 3683 10059 12647 7305 19952

14-Feb-04 0 0 0 9 9 12 21 10 6348 3689 10037 12591 7317 19908

15-Feb-04 0 0 0 7 12 0 12 11 6498 3709 10207 12889 7357 20246

16-Feb-04 0 0 0 5 66 0 66 15 6426 3695 10121 12745 7330 20075

17-Feb-04 0 0 0 4 260 0 260 33 5660 3726 9386 11227 7390 18617

18-Feb-04 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 33 7132 3717 10849 14146 7373 21519

19-Feb-04 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 34 7296 3711 11007 14471 7361 21832

20-Feb-04 0 12 12 3 24 0 24 35 7423 3708 11131 14723 7355 22078

21-Feb-04 0 0 0 3 21 0 21 35 7663 3711 11374 15200 7361 22561

22-Feb-04 0 0 0 3 6 24 30 37 7435 3725 11160 14747 7388 22135

23-Feb-04 0 24 24 4 13 0 13 38 7419 4227 11647 14716 8385 23101

24-Feb-04 0 12 12 4 12 12 24 39 7317 4386 11704 14514 8700 23214

25-Feb-04 87 60 147 15 756 0 756 91 6807 3961 10768 13502 7856 21358

26-Feb-04 54 72 126 24 282 0 282 110 7082 4279 11361 14048 8487 22535

27-Feb-04 138 120 258 41 84 12 96 115 7475 4475 11951 14827 8877 23704

28-Feb-04 164 60 224 57 6 12 18 115 7768 4459 12227 15407 8845 24252

29-Feb-04 162 72 234 74 9 0 9 115 7639 4383 12022 15152 8693 23845

Total 681 480 1161 XXXX 1622 132 1754 XXXX 184656 114859 299516 366266 227823 594089

Delta Smelt Incidental Take Levels

Yellow Light Level = 400 (14 day Average)

Red Light Level = 10,910 (February-Below Normal)

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOSEPH DURBIN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 289 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 17th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7785
ALLEN HARPER-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CHARLES COLLINS; KEITH HAMLIN-BEY; BRENT MARLOWE HARRIS; DARRYL JOHNSON-BEY; THORNELL MARSHALL; KEVIN RUAYON, Plaintiffs, versus PARRIS GLENDENING, Governor; CURTIS DICKSON,Administrator, Somerset County Health Department; EARL D. BESHEARS, Chief Executive, Eastern Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 3130-L) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Harper-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action and order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harper-El v. Glendening , No. CA97-3130-L (D. Md. Oct. 16 & Nov. 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
David G. Barger (VSB No. 21652) 

Thomas J. McKee, Jr. (VSB No. 68427) 

J. Gregory Milmoe (admitted pro hac vice) 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000 

McLean, Virginia 22102 

Telephone: (703) 749-1300 

Fax: (703) 749-1301 

Email: mckeet@gtlaw.com 

Counsel to ULX Partners, LLC and UnitedLex Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

In re: 

LECLAIRRYAN PLLC, 

 Debtor. 

Lynn L. Tavenner, as Chapter 7 Trustee, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ULX Partners, LLC and UnitedLex Corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Chapter 7 

Case No. 19-34574 (KRH) 

 Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142-KRH 

 

DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGNATION OF RECORD 

WITH RESPECT TO THEIR MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE REFERENCE AND 

IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE REFERENCE

Defendants ULX Partners, LLC and UnitedLex Corporation, by counsel and pursuant to 

Local Bankruptcy Rule 5011-1(C), designate the following additional portions of the record with 

respect to their Motion to Withdraw the Reference and Memorandum in Support Thereof that was 

filed on January 11, 2021 [Docket No. 13] and their Reply Memorandum in Support of Their 

Motion to Withdraw the Reference that was filed on February 8, 2021 in response to Plaintiff’s 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 22 Filed 02/08/21 Entered 02/08/21 17:22:24 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Withdraw the Reference that was filed on January 25, 2021 

[Docket No. 19]: 

BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING NO. 19-34574 (KRH) 

(i) Transcript of Hearing held on December 19, 2019 at 1:05 p.m. [Docket No. 743]. 

Dated: February 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Thomas J. McKee, Jr. 

David G. Barger (VSB No. 21652) 

Thomas J. McKee, Jr. (VSB No. 68427) 

J. Gregory Milmoe (admitted pro hac vice) 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000 

McLean, Virginia 22102 

Telephone: (703) 749-1300 

Fax: (703) 749-1301 

Email: mckeet@gtlaw.com 

Counsel to Defendants 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 22 Filed 02/08/21 Entered 02/08/21 17:22:24 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 8th day of February 2021, I served a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing document via the Court’s CM/ECF filing system upon: 

 Erika L. Morabito, Esq. 

 Brittany J. Nelson, Esq. 

 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

 3000 K Street, NW, Suite 600 

 Washington, DC 20007-5109 

 emorabito@foley.com 

 bnelson@foley.com 

 Special Counsel to Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee 

__/s/ Thomas J. McKee, Jr.____________

Thomas J. McKee, Jr. (VSB No. 68427) 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000 

McLean, Virginia 22102 

Telephone: (703) 749-1300 

Facsimile: (703) 749-1301 

Email: mckeet@gtlaw.com 

Counsel to Defendants 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 22 Filed 02/08/21 Entered 02/08/21 17:22:24 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3