alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 34,138

5 LIONEL ROCKYMORE,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Brett Lovelace, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender

13 Sergio J. Viscoli, Assistant Public Defender

14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 WECHSLER, Judge.
2

1 {1} Defendant Lionel Rockymore appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the

2 metropolitan court’s sentencing order, filed after Defendant entered a conditional no

3 contest plea to driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI), first

4 offense; no seat belt; and expired registration. In this Court’s notice of proposed

5 disposition, we proposed to adopt the memorandum opinion of the district court and

6 affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition, which we have duly considered.

7 We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s arguments and therefore affirm.

8 {2} Defendant responded to our notice of proposed disposition with a memorandum

9 in opposition, in which he recites the same facts and continues to raise the same

10 arguments that he made in his docketing statement. “A party responding to a summary

11 calendar notice must come forward and specifically point out errors of law and fact[,]”

12 and the repetition of earlier arguments does not fulfill this requirement. State v.

13 Mondragon, 1988-NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003, superseded by

14 statute on other grounds as stated in State v. Harris, 2013-NMCA-031, ¶ 3, 297 P.3d

15 374. Because Defendant does not raise any new arguments or issues to convince us

16 to reconsider our proposed disposition, we adopt the district court’s memorandum

17 opinion. See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d

18 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held that, in summary calendar cases, the burden is
3

1 on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or

2 law.”).

3 {3} For the reasons stated in this opinion, our notice of proposed summary

4 disposition, and the memorandum opinion of the district court, we affirm. 

5 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 ________________________________

7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 ________________________________

10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

11 ________________________________

12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 FOR YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996 AND 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-K OF THE
COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,628
<INVENTORY>                                     27,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,823
<PP&E>                                          26,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,564
<SALES>                                        136,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,622
<CGS>                                          133,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (153)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.68)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

 Division

In re 

 Debtor(s) Case No. 

 Chapter 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE LISTS, SCHEDULES AND STATEMENTS 

The above debtor(s) having failed to timely file required lists, schedules and statements

within time periods as set forth in Local Rule 1007-1; it is, therefore 

ORDERED, pursuant to Local Rule 1007-1, that the above case be dismissed; and it is 

further

[If appropriate] ORDERED that the debtor(s) pay the balance of the filing fee in the 

amount of $ _________________ to the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of this 

order; and it is further 

ORDERED that dismissal of this case revests the property of the estate in the entity in which 

such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case. The trustee need not 

file a final report in this case unless property or money was administered. 

WILLIAM C. REDDEN 

Clerk of Court 

Date: ____________________ By _______________________________________ 

 Deputy Clerk 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET: 

 _______________________________

 [odisflss ver. 12/09]

Newport News

Daniel Robert Leadbetter

17-51058-SCS

7

335.00

August 10, 2017 /s/Vickie Griffin

August 10, 2017

Case 17-51058-SCS Doc 16 Filed 08/10/17 Entered 08/10/17 16:17:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.166 Stills and other equipment.

If recovered denatured spirits or articles are to be restored on the permittee's premises, all equipment to be used in the restoration process shall be located on the permit premises. Distilling apparatus or other equipment, including pipelines, for restoration or for recovery, shall be constructed and secured in such a manner as to prevent unauthorized access to the denatured spirits and so arranged as to be readily inspected by appropriate TTB officers.
#### August Uecker, appellee, v. Albert Magdanz, appellant.

Filed October 1, 1901.

No. 10,321.

Appeal in Law Action Does Not Invest This Court With Jurisdiction. An appeal.from an order or judgment of the district court in a law action does not invest this court with jurisdiction of the cause. *Hayden v. Hale,*57 Nebr., 349.

Appeal from the district court for Pierce county. Heard below before Robinson, J.

*Dismissed.*

*W. W. Quivey,*for appellant.

*O. B. Willey, contra.*

Holcomb, J.

There is brought to this court a transcript of the record of the trial court and a bill of exceptions duly settled and *619allowed. No petition in error has been filed and the parties are designated as appellee and appellant respectively. From the proceedings taken to bring the cause here and since had, and as more than a year has elapsed since the rendition of the judgment, we can only regard the action as pending in this court on appeal from the court below. The action is one purely of law for the recovery of the value of property alleged to have been converted to his own use by the defendant, who appeals from the judgment rendered against him on the trial had in the district court. We have repeatedly held, in conformity with constitutional and statutory provisions, that the appellate jurisdiction of this court in law actions is by proceedings in error and not by appeal. *Robertson v. Hall,*2 Nebr., 17; *Hosford v. Stone,*6 Nebr., 378; *Campbell v. Farmers & Merchants Bank,*49 Nebr., 143; *Collins v. City of Omaha,*55 Nebr., 208; *Lowe v. Riley,*57 Nebr., 252; *Hayden v. Hale,*57 Nebr., 349.

For these reasons the appeal must be dismissed at the cost of appellant.

Dismissed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.
Exhibit 5
 
  
      
 
  
 201 St. Charles Avenue § New Orleans, Louisiana § § Fax § E-Mail §
 Alabama       Arizona       District of
Columbia       Florida       Georgia      
Louisiana       Texas
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In the Matter of:

Chapter 13

CHRISTIAN E. DORSEY

Case No. 19-13402-BFK

Debtor

WITHDRAWAL

I ask that the Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, Alexandria Division to please withdraw Trustee’s Motion to 

Dismiss and Objection to Confirmation filed with this Court on the above captioned 

matter and scheduled for hearing on October 22, 2020. 

_October 15, 2020 _______ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________

Dated Thomas P. Gorman

Chapter 13 Trustee

300 N. Washington Street, #400

Alexandria, VA 22314

(703) 836-2226

VSB #26421

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this 15th day of October, 2020 served via ECF to authorized 

users or mailed a true copy of the foregoing Withdrawal to the following parties.

Tommy Andrews, Jr., Esq.

Attorney for Debtor

122 N. Alfred St.

Alexandria, VA 22314 

___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______

Thomas P. Gorman

Case 19-13402-BFK Doc 67 Filed 10/15/20 Entered 10/15/20 12:36:44 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.135 State code numbers.

In showing the permit number on labels as provided in § 20.134(b)(2)(ii), the permittee who distributes the article may substitute the appropriate number shown below for the State abbreviation. For example, permit number SDA-CONN-1234 may be shown on the labels as SDA-07-1234. The code numbers for the respective State are as follows:

- 01—Alabama
- 02—Alaska
- 03—Arizona
- 04—Arkansas
- 05—California
- 06—Colorado
- 07—Connecticut
- 08—Delaware
- 09—DC
- 10—Florida
- 11—Georgia
- 12—Hawaii
- 13—Idaho
- 14—Illinois
- 15—Indiana
- 16—Iowa
- 17—Kansas
- 18—Kentucky
- 19—Louisiana
- 20—Maine
- 21—Maryland
- 22—Massachusetts
- 23—Michigan
- 24—Minnesota
- 25—Mississippi
- 26—Missouri
- 27—Montana
- 28—Nebraska
- 29—Nevada
- 30—New Hampshire
- 31—New Jersey
- 32—New Mexico
- 33—New York
- 34—North Carolina
- 35—North Dakota
- 36—Ohio
- 37—Oklahoma
- 38—Oregon
- 39—Pennsylvania
- 40—Rhode Island
- 41—South Carolina
- 42—South Dakota
- 43—Tennessee
- 44—Texas
- 45—Utah
- 46—Vermont
- 47—Virginia
- 48—Washington
- 49—West Virginia
- 50—Wisconsin
- 51—Wyoming
§ 668.115 Prehearing conference. ( a ) In the event that the hearing official considers a prehearing conference necessary, he may convene a prehearing conference.
( b ) The purpose of a prehearing conference is to allow the parties to settle or narrow the dispute. A prehearing conference consists of— ( 1 ) A telephone conference call;
( 2 ) An informal meeting of the parties with the hearing official; or
( 3 ) The submission and exchange of written materials by the parties.
( c ) All prehearing conferences requiring appearances by the parties shall take place in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
[52 FR 30115, Aug. 12, 1987, correctly designated at 52 FR 46354, Dec. 7, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 47753, Oct. 19, 1992]
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title:    National compensation survey. Dayton-Springfield-Greenville,    OH.
 
SuDocs Number: L 2.121/35:D 33/
Item    Number:0768-B-35    (online)
GPO    System Number: [if !vml]>[endif]>
 
 
 
2010
2009
2008
2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  April 13, 2020  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 283

 273

 279

 260

 260

 238

 261

 240

 231

 231

 232

 231

 237

 255

 267

 302

 337

 366

 337

 320

 275

 286

 342

 416

 492

 611

 941

 1,025

 1,791

 2,128

 1,832

 209

 208

 216

 214

 210

 211

 212

 213

 215

 214

 209

 207

 207

 212

 218

 224

 225

 235

 233

 226

 222

 218

 217

 220

 227

 238

 247

 272

 286

 296

 314

 232

 232

 242

 237

 235

 226

 227

 225

 224

 220

 220

 218

 217

 223

 232

 246

 254

 262

 259

 263

 245

 233

 243

 253

 270

 278

 344

 405

 572

 677

 627

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,326

 5,022

 4,783

 4,485

 4,170

 3,815

 3,619

 3,453

 3,347

 3,272

 3,240

 3,211

 3,189

 3,178

 3,178

 3,192

 3,204

 3,229

 3,253

 3,290

 3,308

 3,316

 3,335

 3,368

 3,418

 3,478

 3,605

 3,787

 4,127

 4,558

 4,931

 380

 359

 342

 320

 298

 273

 259

 247

 239

 234

 231

 229

 228

 227

 227

 228

 229

 231

 232

 235

 236

 237

 238

 241

 244

 248

 258

 271

 295

 326

 352

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 19.121 Change in production procedure. If the proprietor plans to produce a new product or make a change to the production procedure that will affect the designation of the product or substantially affect the character of the product, the proprietor must: ( a ) File form TTB F 5110.41, Registration of Distilled Spirits Plant, to amend the registration;
( b ) Provide a new statement of production procedure as described in § 19.77; and
( c ) Receive approval of the amended registration before implementing the change in the production procedure.
(26 U.S.C. 5172)
H:\DATA\PUBLIC\~WATER\~SMITH\FISHDATA\OCT99_SEP00\99_00all.wk4 02/21/01 02:13:05 PM 06/01/00 06/06/00 06/11/00 06/16/00 06/21/00 06/26/00 07/01/00 07/06/00 07/11/00 07/16/00 07/21/00 07/26/00 07/31/00 08/05/00 08/10/00 08/15/00 08/20/00 08/25/00 08/30/00 09/04/00 09/09/00 09/14/00 09/19/00 09/24/00 09/29/00

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Thousands

Salvage

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Pumping x 100 Acre Foot

SWP Salvage

CVP Salvage

14-Day Avg

Salvage

SWP Pumping

Total Pumping

Delta Smelt Salvage

2000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 399.53

 399.42

 399.33

 399.29

 399.15

 399.01

 398.95

 398.82

 398.34

 397.92

 397.59

 397.24

 396.87

 396.43

 395.97

 395.66

 395.39

 395.18

 395.32

 395.68

 395.81

 395.87

 395.82

 395.72

 395.73

 396.09

 396.35

 396.51

 396.54

 396.48

 396.31

 376.3

 375.6

 375.0

 374.7

 373.8

 372.9

 372.5

 371.6

 368.5

 365.8

 363.6

 361.4

 359.0

 356.2

 353.2

 351.3

 349.6

 348.2

 349.1

 351.4

 352.2

 352.6

 352.3

 351.7

 351.7

 354.0

 355.7

 356.7

 356.9

 356.5

 355.4

STORAGE

-0.1

-0.7

-0.6

-0.3

-0.9

-0.9

-0.4

-0.8

-3.1

-2.7

-2.1

-2.3

-2.4

-2.8

-2.9

-2.0

-1.7

-1.3

+0.9

+2.3

+0.8

+0.4

-0.3

-0.6

+0.1

+2.3

+1.7

+1.0

+0.2

-0.4

-1.1

CHANGE

1,242

1,115

977

1,020

824

844

1,123

1,067

259

437

767

691

613

400

288

761

925

957

2,202

2,375

2,067

1,968

1,628

1,362

1,723

2,679

2,367

2,060

1,712

1,438

1,099

INFLOW

 1,052

 1,219

 998

 882

 1,024

 1,047

 1,063

 1,229

 1,575

 1,536

 1,559

 1,538

 1,529

 1,564

 1,527

 1,495

 1,551

 1,404

 1,550

 1,056

 1,420

 1,532

 1,590

 1,487

 1,493

 1,328

 1,328

 1,366

 1,425

 1,444

 1,466

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 235

 240

 245

 240

 235

 230

 229

 233

 225

 224

 231

 237

 236

 225

 210

 221

 202

 190

 191

 173

 171

 175

 174

 175

 177

 171

 165

 168

 168

 167

 168

PUMPING

 22

 22

 33

 31

 31

 33

 29

 33

 40

 57

 52

 56

 48

 28

 32

 32

 32

 32

 15

 0

 62

 70

 23

 19

 21

 30

 36

 11

 22

 21

 13

C.F.S.

 .10

 .10

 .15

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .13

 .15

 .18

 .26

 .24

 .26

 .22

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .07

 .00

 .29

 .33

 .11

 .09

 .10

 .14

 .17

 .05

 .10

 .10

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .29

 .00

 1.30

 .54

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .05

 .04

 1.00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 16, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -20.7 38,990 42,277 0 0 6,331 986 4.56 3.66

ACRE-FEET -20,700 77,337 83,856 0 0 12,558 1,956

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 83,856

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 12,558

TOTAL 96,414

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 4.14

 376.4

OUTLET 0 3.66

Table 11
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the Federal Register) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver 
                        ( print page 2688)
                        for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: January 10, 2011. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10325
First Commercial Bank of Florida
Orlando
FL
1/7/201110326
Legacy Bank
Scottsdale
AZ
1/7/2011


[FR Doc. 2011-761 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P