" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

112TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REPORT

112–329 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 

CONFERENCE REPORT 

TO ACCOMPANY

H.R. 1540 

DECEMBER 12, 2011.—Ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

71–516 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

112TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REPORT

2011

112–329 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 

CONFERENCE REPORT 

TO ACCOMPANY

H.R. 1540 

DECEMBER 12, 2011.—Ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(III) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Compliance with House of Representatives and Senate Rules ............................ 573 

Explanation of funding summary .................................................................... 573 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AUTHORIZATIONS ................. 580 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT .......................................................................................... 580 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 580 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101) .............................................. 580 

Subtitle B—Army Programs ............................................................................ 580 

Limitation on procurement of Stryker combat vehicles (sec. 111) ........ 580 

Limitation on retirement of C–23 aircraft (sec. 112) .............................. 580 

Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/ 

HH–60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters (sec. 

113) ......................................................................................................... 581 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs ............................................................................ 581 

Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common 

cockpits for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters (sec. 121) ............................ 581 

Separate procurement line item for certain Littoral Combat Ship 

mission modules (sec. 122) .................................................................... 581 

Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis on alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program (sec. 123) ... 581 

Extension of Ford-class aircraft carrier construction authority (sec. 

124) ......................................................................................................... 582 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs ..................................................................... 582 

Strategic airlift aircraft force structure (sec. 131) .................................. 582 

Limitations on the use of funds to retire B–1 bomber aircraft (sec. 

132) ......................................................................................................... 582 

Limitation on retirement of U–2 aircraft (sec. 133) ............................... 582 

Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds for research and development 

relating to the B–2 bomber aircraft (sec. 134) .................................... 583 

Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds to support alternative options 

for extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of 

record (sec. 135) ..................................................................................... 584 

Procurement of advanced extremely high frequency satellites (sec. 

136) ......................................................................................................... 584 

Subtitle E—Joint and Multiservice Matters .................................................. 585 

Limitation on availability of funds for acquisition of joint tactical 

radio system (sec. 141) .......................................................................... 585 

Limitation on availability of funds for aviation foreign internal defense program (sec. 142) ........................................................................ 585 

F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft (sec. 143) .......................................... 585 

Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command 

(sec. 144) ................................................................................................. 585 

Inclusion of information on approved Combat Mission Requirements 

in quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirement Funds 

(sec. 145) ................................................................................................. 586 

Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft re-engining 

program (sec. 146) .................................................................................. 586 

Authority for exchange with United Kingdom of specified F–35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft (sec. 147) .................................... 586 

Report on probationary period in development of short take-off, 

vertical landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter (sec. 148) .......... 587 

Report on plan to implement Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 

Act of 2009 measures within the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program (sec. 149) ....................................................................................... 587 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

IV 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 587 

Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA replacement ship designated LHA–7 ............................................................... 587 

Multiyear funding for procurement of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers 587 

Limitation on availability of funds for F/A–18 service life extension 

program .................................................................................................. 588 

Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capabilities ........................ 588 

Limitation on availability of funds for commercial satellite procurement ........................................................................................................ 588 

Separate procurement line item for non-lethal weapons funding ......... 588 

Study on domestic capacity for manufacture of ship shafts and other 

forged components ................................................................................. 588 

Transfer of Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and 

Reconnaissance Aircraft to the Army ................................................... 589 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION ............................. 590 

Budget Item ...................................................................................................... 590 

Armored multipurpose vehicle program .................................................. 590 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 590 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201) .............................................. 590 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations ............ 590 

Limitation on availability of funds for the ground combat vehicle 

program (sec. 211) .................................................................................. 590 

Limitation on the individual carbine program (sec. 212) ....................... 591 

Limitation on availability of funds for future unmanned carrier-based 

strike system (sec. 213) ......................................................................... 591 

Limitation on availability of funds for amphibious assault vehicles 

of the Marine Corps (sec. 214) .............................................................. 592 

Limitation on obligation of funds for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft 

program (sec. 215) .................................................................................. 592 

Limitation on use of funds for Increment 2 of B–2 bomber aircraft 

extremely high frequency satellite communications program (sec. 

216) ......................................................................................................... 593 

Limitation on availability of funds for the Joint Space Operations 

Center management system (sec. 217) ................................................. 593 

Limitation on availability of funds for wireless innovation fund (sec. 

218) ......................................................................................................... 593 

Prohibition on delegation of budgeting authority for certain research 

and educational programs (sec. 219) .................................................... 594 

Designation of main propulsion turbomachinery of the next-generation long-range strike bomber aircraft as major subprogram (sec. 

220) ......................................................................................................... 594 

Designation of electromagnetic aircraft launch system development 

and procurement program as major subprogram (sec. 221) ............... 594 

Advanced rotorcraft flight research and development (sec. 222) .......... 594 

Preservation and storage of certain property related to F136 propulsion system (sec. 223) ............................................................................ 595 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs ........................................................... 595 

Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system (sec. 231) ......................................................................................... 595 

Comptroller General review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs (sec. 232) ..................................................................... 595 

Homeland defense hedging policy and strategy (sec. 233) ..................... 595 

Ground-based Midcourse Defense program (sec. 234) ............................ 596 

Limitation on availability of funds for the Medium Extended Air 

Defense System (sec. 235) ..................................................................... 596 

Sense of Congress regarding ballistic missile defense training (sec. 

236) ......................................................................................................... 597 

Subtitle D—Reports ......................................................................................... 597 

Extension of requirements for biennial roadmap and annual review 

and certification on funding for development of hypersonics (sec. 

241) ......................................................................................................... 597 

Report and cost assessment of options for Ohio-class replacement 

ballistic missile submarine (sec. 242) ................................................... 597 

Report on the electromagnetic rail gun system (sec. 243) ..................... 598 

Annual Comptroller General report on the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program (sec. 244) .......................................................................... 598 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

V 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION—Continued 

Subtitle D—Reports—Continued 

Independent review and assessment of cryptographic modernization 

program (sec. 245) .................................................................................. 598 

Report on increased budget items (sec. 246) ........................................... 599 

Subtitle E—Other Matters .............................................................................. 599 

Repeal of requirement for Technology Transition Initiative (sec. 251) . 599 

Contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense 

systems (sec. 252) .................................................................................. 599 

Extension of authority for mechanisms to provide funds for defense 

laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions (sec. 253) ......................................................................... 599 

National defense education program (sec. 254) ...................................... 600 

Laboratory facilities, Hanover, New Hampshire (sec. 255) ................... 600 

Sense of Congress on active matrix organic light emitting diode technology (sec. 256) ..................................................................................... 600 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 600 

Study on space-based interceptor technology .......................................... 600 

Application of RNA biological and functional science and technology .. 601 

Prohibition on use of funds for newly designed flight suit .................... 601 

Prohibitions relating to use of funds for research, development, test, 

and evaluation on the F136 engine ...................................................... 601 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ............................................................ 601 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 601 

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301) ...................................... 601 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions ...................................... 601 

Designation of senior official of Joint Chiefs of Staff for operational 

energy plans and programs and operational energy budget certification (sec. 311) ...................................................................................... 601 

Improved Sikes Act coverage of State-owned facilities used for the 

national defense (sec. 312) .................................................................... 602 

Discharge of wastes at sea generated by ships of the armed forces 

(sec. 313) ................................................................................................. 602 

Modification to the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs (sec. 314) .......... 602 

Energy-efficient technologies in contracts for logistics support of contingency operations (sec. 315) ............................................................... 602 

Health assessment reports required when waste is disposed of in 

open-air burn pits (sec. 316) ................................................................. 603 

Streamlined annual report on defense environmental programs (sec. 

317) ......................................................................................................... 603 

Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties 

in connection with Jackson Park Housing Complex, Washington 

(sec. 318) ................................................................................................. 603 

Requirements relating to Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry investigation of exposure to drinking water contamination 

at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina (sec. 319) ....................................... 603 

Fire suppression agents (sec. 320) ........................................................... 603 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment .......................................................... 604 

Definition of depot-level maintenance and repair (sec. 321) .................. 604 

Designation of military arsenal facilities as Centers of Industrial 

and Technical Excellence (sec. 322) ..................................................... 604 

Permanent and expanded authority for Army industrial facilities to 

enter into certain cooperative arrangements with non-Army entities (sec. 323) .......................................................................................... 604 

Implementation of corrective actions resulting from corrosion study 

of the F–22 and F–35 aircraft (sec. 324) .............................................. 605 

Modification of requirements relating to minimum capital investment 

for certain depots (sec. 325) .................................................................. 605 

Reports on depot-related activities (sec. 326) .......................................... 606 

Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities (sec. 327) .......... 606 

Subtitle D—Readiness ..................................................................................... 606 

Modification of Department of Defense authority to accept voluntary 

contributions of funds (sec. 331) ........................................................... 606 

Review of proposed structures affecting navigable airspace (sec. 332) . 607 

Subtitle E—Reports .......................................................................................... 607 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

VI 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

Subtitle E—Reports—Continued 

Annual certification and modifications of annual report on 

prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 341) ................................ 607 

Additional matters for inclusion in and modified deadline for the 

annual report on operational energy (sec. 342) ................................... 607 

Study on Air Force test and training range infrastructure (sec. 343) .. 607 

Study on training range infrastructure for special operations forces 

(sec. 344) ................................................................................................. 607 

Guidance to establish non-tactical wheeled vehicle and equipment 

service life extension programs to achieve costs savings (sec. 345) ... 608 

Study on United States force posture in the United States Pacific 

Command area of responsibility (sec. 346) .......................................... 608 

Study on overseas basing presence of United States forces (sec. 347) .. 608 

Inclusion of assessment of joint military training and force allocations in Quadrennial Defense Review and National Military Strategy (sec. 348) .......................................................................................... 608 

Modification of report on procurement of military working dogs (sec. 

349) ......................................................................................................... 609 

Subtitle F—Limitations and Extension of Authority .................................... 609 

Adoption of military working dog by family of deceased or seriously 

wounded member of the armed forces who was the dog’s handler 

(sec. 351) ................................................................................................. 609 

Prohibition on expansion of the Air Force food transformation initiative (sec. 352) ......................................................................................... 609 

Designation and limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds 

for the migration of Army enterprise email services (sec. 353) ......... 609 

One-year extension of pilot program for availability of working-capital funds to Army for certain product improvements (sec. 354) ....... 610 

Subtitle G—Other Matters .............................................................................. 610 

Commercial sale of small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition components in excess of military requirements, and fired cartridge cases (sec. 361) ............................................................................ 610 

Comptroller General review on space-available travel on military 

aircraft (sec. 362) ................................................................................... 611 

Authority to provide information for maritime safety of forces and 

hydrographic support (sec. 363) ............................................................ 611 

Deposit of reimbursed funds under reciprocal fire protection agreements (sec. 364) ..................................................................................... 611 

Clarification of the airlift service definitions relative to the Civil 

Reserve Air Fleet (sec. 365) .................................................................. 612 

Ratemaking procedures for Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts (sec. 

366) ......................................................................................................... 612 

Policy on active shooter training for certain law enforcement personnel (sec. 367) ..................................................................................... 612 

Procurement of tents or other temporary structures (sec. 368) ............ 612 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 612 

Consideration of energy security and reliability in development and 

implementation of energy performance goals ...................................... 612 

Limitation on revising the definition of depot-level maintenance ......... 613 

Redesignation of core competencies as core depot maintenance capabilities for Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence ............... 613 

Modification of report on maintenance and repair of vessels in foreign 

shipyards ................................................................................................ 613 

Working-capital fund accounting ............................................................. 613 

Modification of report on SEAD/DEAD mission requirements of the 

Air Force ................................................................................................. 613 

Limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds for migration of 

management of Air Force Enterprise Logistics Systems Program 

Executive Office pending cost-benefit analysis ................................... 614 

Consideration of foreclosure circumstances in adjudication of security 

clearances ............................................................................................... 614 

Reduction in amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to 

the Department of Defense for printing and reproduction ................. 614 

Reduction in amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to 

the Department of Defense for studies, analysis, and evaluations ... 614 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

VII 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Sense of Congress on proposed Federal Aviation Administration 

changes to flight crew member duty and rest requirements ............. 615 

Assistance for homeland defense mission training ................................. 615 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS ............................................... 615 

Subtitle A—Active Forces ................................................................................ 615 

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401) ................................................ 615 

Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels 

(sec. 402) ................................................................................................. 616 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces ............................................................................. 616 

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411) ........................................ 616 

End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves 

(sec. 412) ................................................................................................. 617 

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413) ............ 617 

Fiscal year 2012 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians 

(sec. 414) ................................................................................................. 618 

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active 

duty for operational support (sec. 415) ................................................ 618 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 619 

Military personnel (sec. 421) .................................................................... 619 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY ................................................................ 619 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy .............................................................. 619 

Increase in authorized strengths for Marine Corps officers on active 

duty in grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel (sec. 501) ... 619 

General officer and flag officer reform (sec. 502) .................................... 619 

National Defense University outplacement waiver (sec. 503) ............... 619 

Voluntary retirement incentive matters (sec. 504) ................................. 620 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management .............................................. 620 

Leadership of National Guard Bureau (sec. 511) ................................... 620 

Membership of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau on the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff (sec. 512) ........................................................................ 620 

Modification of time in which preseparation counseling must be provided to reserve component members being demobilized (sec. 513) .. 621 

Clarification of applicability of authority for deferral of mandatory 

separation of military technicians (dual status) until age 60 (sec. 

514) ......................................................................................................... 621 

Authority to order Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve to active duty to provide assistance 

in response to a major disaster or emergency (sec. 515) .................... 621 

Authority for order to active duty of units of the Selected Reserve 

for preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands 

(sec. 516) ................................................................................................. 622 

Modification of eligibility for consideration for promotion for reserve 

officers employed as military technicians (dual status) (sec. 517) ..... 622 

Consideration of reserve component officers in appointments to certain command positions (sec. 518) ........................................................ 622 

Report on termination of military technician as a distinct personnel 

management category (sec. 519) ........................................................... 623 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities ........................................................ 623 

Sense of Congress on the unique nature, demands, and hardships 

of military service (sec. 521) ................................................................. 623 

Policy addressing dwell time and measurement and data collection 

regarding unit operating tempo and personnel tempo (sec. 522) ...... 623 

Protected communications by members of the armed forces and prohibition of retaliatory personnel actions (sec. 523) ................................ 623 

Notification requirement for determination made in response to review of proposal for award of Medal of Honor not previously submitted in timely fashion (sec. 524) ....................................................... 624 

Expansion of regular enlisted members covered by early discharge 

authority (sec. 525) ................................................................................ 624 

Extension of voluntary separation pay and benefits authority (sec. 

526) ......................................................................................................... 624 

Prohibition on denial of reenlistment of members for unsuitability 

based on the same medical condition for which they were determined to be fit for duty (sec. 527) ........................................................ 625 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

VIII 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities—Continued 

Designation of persons authorized to direct disposition of remains 

of members of the armed forces (sec. 528) ........................................... 625 

Matters covered by preseparation counseling for members of the 

Armed Forces and their spouses (sec. 529) .......................................... 625 

Conversion of high-deployment allowance from mandatory to authorized (sec. 530) ......................................................................................... 625 

Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to 

enhance retention of members of the armed forces (sec. 531) ........... 625 

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools (sec. 532) ....................................................................... 626 

Department of Defense Suicide Prevention Program (sec. 533) ............ 626 

Subtitle D—Military Justice and Legal Matters ........................................... 626 

Reform of offenses relating to rape, sexual assault, and other sexual 

misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 541) .. 626 

Authority to compel production of documentary evidence (sec. 542) .... 626 

Clarification of application and extent of direct acceptance of gifts 

authority (sec. 543) ................................................................................ 627 

Freedom of conscience of military chaplains with respect to the performance of marriages (sec. 544) .......................................................... 627 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration ............................................................................................................ 627 

Employment skills training for members of the armed forces on active duty who are transitioning to civilian life (sec. 551) ................... 627 

Enhancement of authorities on joint professional military education 

(sec. 552) ................................................................................................. 628 

Temporary authority to wave maximum age limitation on admission 

to the military service academies (sec. 553) ........................................ 628 

Enhancement of administration of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology (sec. 554) ................................................................. 628 

Enrollment of certain seriously wounded, ill, or injured former or 

retired enlisted members of the armed forces in associate degree 

programs of the Community College of the Air Force in order 

to complete degree program (sec. 555) ................................................. 629 

Reserve component mental health stipend (sec. 556) ............................. 629 

Fiscal year 2012 administration and report on the Troops-to-Teachers 

Program (sec. 557) ................................................................................. 629 

Pilot program on receipt of civilian credentialing for skills required 

for military occupational specialties (sec. ) .......................................... 630 

Report on certain education assistance programs (sec. 559) ................. 630 

Subtitle F—Armed Forces Retirement Home ................................................ 630 

Control and administration by Secretary of Defense (sec. 561) ............ 630 

Senior Medical Advisor oversight of health care provided to residents 

of Armed Forces Retirement Home (sec. 562) ..................................... 631 

Establishment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Advisory Council 

and Resident Advisory Committees (sec. 563) ..................................... 631 

Administrators, ombudsmen, and staff of facilities (sec. 564) ............... 631 

Revision of fee requirements (sec. 565) ................................................... 631 

Revision of inspection requirements (sec. 566) ....................................... 631 

Repeal of obsolete transitional provisions and technical conforming, 

and clerical amendments (sec. 567) ...................................................... 632 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters .................................................................................................. 632 

Impact aid for children with disabilities (sec. 571) ................................ 632 

Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that 

benefit dependents of member of the armed forces and Department 

of Defense civilian employees (sec. 572) .............................................. 632 

Three-year extension and enhancement of authorities on transition 

of military dependent students among local educational agencies 

(sec. 573) ................................................................................................. 632 

Revision to membership of Department of Defense Military Family 

Readiness Council (sec. 574) ................................................................. 633 

Reemployment rights following certain National Guard duty (sec. 

575) ......................................................................................................... 633 

Expansion of Operation Hero Miles (sec. 576) ........................................ 633 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

IX 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters—Continued 

Report on Department of Defense autism pilot and demonstration 

projects (sec. 577) ................................................................................... 633 

Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of 

Defense military spouse employment programs (sec. 578) ................. 634 

Subtitle H—Improved Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in the 

Armed Forces ................................................................................................ 634 

Access of sexual assault victims to legal assistance and services 

of sexual assault response coordinators and sexual assault victim 

advocates (sec. 581) ............................................................................... 634 

Consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit 

transfer based on humanitarian conditions for victim of sexual 

assault or related offense (sec. 582) ..................................................... 635 

Director of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (sec. 583) 635 

Sexual assault response coordinators and sexual assault victim advocates (sec. 584) ....................................................................................... 635 

Training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and 

response program (sec. 585) .................................................................. 635 

Department of Defense policy and procedures on retention and access 

to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members for the armed forces (sec. 586) ...................................................... 636 

Subtitle I—Other Matters ................................................................................ 636 

Department of Defense authority to carry out personnel recovery 

reintegration and post-isolation support activities (sec. 588) ............ 636 

Military adaptive sports program (sec. 589) ........................................... 636 

Enhancement and improvement of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program (sec. 590) ....................................................................................... 637 

Army National Military Cemeteries (sec. 591) ....................................... 637 

Inspection of military cemeteries under jurisdiction of the military 

departments (sec. 592) ........................................................................... 637 

Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross for Captain Frederick L. Spaulding for acts of valor during the Vietnam 

War (sec. 593) ......................................................................................... 637 

Authorization and request for award of Medal of Honor to Emil 

Kapaun for acts of valor during the Korean War (sec. 594) .............. 638 

Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to Jewish American 

World War I veterans (sec. 595) ........................................................... 638 

Report on process for expedited determination of disability of members of the armed forces with certain disabling conditions (sec. 

596) ......................................................................................................... 638 

Comptroller General study of military necessity of Selective Service 

System and alternatives (sec. 597) ....................................................... 638 

Evaluation of issues affecting the disposition of remains of American 

sailors killed in the explosion of the Ketch U.S.S. Intrepid in Tripoli Harbor on September 4, 1804 (sec. 598) ......................................... 639 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 639 

Modification of definition of ‘‘joint duty assignment’’ to include all 

instructor assignments for joint training and education .................... 639 

Authorized leave available for members of the armed forces upon 

birth or adoption of a child ................................................................... 639 

Navy recruiting and advertising .............................................................. 640 

Limitation on simultaneous deployment to combat zones of dualmilitary couples who have minor dependents ..................................... 640 

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating 

to correction of military records ........................................................... 640 

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge ................................. 640 

Additional condition on repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy .............. 640 

Military regulations regarding marriage ................................................ 641 

Use of military installations as site for marriage ceremonies and 

participation of chaplains and other military and civilian personnel 

in their official capacity ......................................................................... 641 

Grade of commissioned officers in uniformed medical accession programs ...................................................................................................... 641 

Appointments to military service academies from nominations made 

by the governor of Puerto Rico ............................................................. 642 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

X 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Consolidation of military department authority to issue arms, tentage, and equipment to educational institutions not maintaining 

units of Junior ROTC ............................................................................ 642 

Education and employment advocacy program for wounded members 

of the armed forces ................................................................................ 642 

Diversity recruitment efforts for the military service academies .......... 642 

Department of Defense support for programs on pro bono legal representation for members of the armed forces ...................................... 642 

Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the armed forces ........................................................................ 643 

Center for Military Family and Community Outreach .......................... 643 

Mental health support for military personnel and families .................. 643 

Sense of Congress regarding financial counseling for military families ........................................................................................................... 643 

Cold War Service Medal ........................................................................... 643 

Privilege in cases arising under Uniform Code of Military Justice 

against disclosure of communications between sexual assault victims and sexual assault response coordinators, victim advocates, 

and certain other persons ..................................................................... 644 

Report on the achievement of diversity goals for the leadership of 

the armed forces .................................................................................... 644 

Specification of period in which application for voter registration 

or absentee ballot from an overseas voter is valid .............................. 644 

Authority to provide support and services for certain organizations 

and activities outside Department of Defense ..................................... 644 

Display of State, District of Columbia, and territorial flags by Armed 

Forces ...................................................................................................... 645 

Wounded warrior careers program .......................................................... 645 

Sense of Congress regarding playing of bugle call commonly known 

as ‘‘Taps’’ at military funerals, memorial services, and wreath laying ceremonies ....................................................................................... 645 

Sense of Congress regarding support for Yellow Ribbon Day ............... 645 

Postal benefits program ............................................................................ 645 

Prohibition on the unauthorized use of names and images of members of the armed forces ........................................................................ 646 

Limitation on military musical units ....................................................... 646 

Short title ................................................................................................... 646 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS ............................. 646 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances ..................................................................... 646 

Resumption of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of 

basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 601) . 646 

Lodging accommodations for members assigned to duty in connection 

with commissioning or fitting out of a ship (sec. 602) ........................ 646 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays ................................... 647 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

reserve forces (sec. 611) ......................................................................... 647 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

health care professionals (sec. 612) ...................................................... 647 

One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear 

officers (sec. 613) .................................................................................... 647 

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated 

special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities (sec. 614) .............. 648 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 

37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615) ................................................ 648 

Modification of qualifying period for payment of hostile fire and imminent danger special pay and hazardous duty special pay (sec. 

616) ......................................................................................................... 648 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Generally .................... 649 

One-year extension of authority to reimburse travel expenses for 

inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance (sec. 

621) ......................................................................................................... 649 

Subtitle D—Consolidation and Reform of Travel and Transportation Authorities .......................................................................................................... 649 

Consolidation and reform of travel and transportation authorities 

of the uniformed services (sections 631 and 632) ................................ 649 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XI 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS—Continued 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 

Benefits and Operations ............................................................................... 649 

Discretion of the Secretary of the Navy to select categories of merchandise to be sold by ship stores afloat (sec. 641) ............................. 649 

Access of military exchange stores system to credit available through 

Federal Financing Bank (sec. 642) ....................................................... 649 

Designation of Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and Meditation Pavilion, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, as a Fisher House 

(sec. 643) ................................................................................................. 650 

Subtitle F—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits .......................... 650 

Death gratuity and related benefits for reserves who die during an 

authorized stay at their residence during or between successive 

days of inactive duty training (sec. 651) .............................................. 650 

Subtitle G—Other Matters .............................................................................. 650 

Report on basic allowance for housing for National Guard members 

transitioning between active duty and full-time National Guard 

duty (sec. 661) ........................................................................................ 650 

Report on incentives for recruitment and retention of health care 

professionals (sec. 662) .......................................................................... 651 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 651 

Fiscal year 2012 increase in military basic pay ...................................... 651 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral 

bonuses ................................................................................................... 651 

Inclusion of members of the armed forces assigned to Egypt MultiNational Force and Observers Mission in United States Central 

Command rest and recuperation absence program ............................ 652 

Repeal of automatic enrollment in Family Servicemembers’ Group 

Life Insurance for members of the armed forces married to other 

members ................................................................................................. 652 

Limitation on availability of certain funds pending report on provision of special compensation for members of the uniformed services 

with injury or illness requiring assistance in everyday living ........... 652 

Repeal of sense of Congress on age and service requirements for 

retired pay for non-regular service ....................................................... 652 

Repeal of requirement of reduction of Survivor Benefits Plan survivor 

annuities by Dependency and Indemnity Compensation ................... 653 

Expansion of use of uniform funding authority to include permanent 

change of station and temporary duty lodging programs operated 

through nonappropriated fund instrumentalities ............................... 653 

Contracting authority for nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to 

provide and obtain goods and services ................................................. 653 

Enhanced commissary stores pilot program ........................................... 653 

Monthly amount and duration of Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance for widows and widowers of deceased members of the armed 

forces affected by required Survivor Benefit Plan annuity offset 

for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation ................................... 653 

Reimbursement of American National Red Cross for humanitarian 

support and other services provided to members of the armed 

forces and their dependents .................................................................. 654 

Treatment of members of the armed forces and civilian employees 

of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded in 

the November 5, 2009, attack at Fort Hood, Texas ............................ 654 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS ................................................................... 654 

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits .............................................. 654 

Annual enrollment fees for certain retirees and dependents (sec. 701) 654 

Mental health assessments for members of the armed forces deployed 

in support of a contingency operation (sec. 702) ................................. 655 

Behavioral health support for members of the reserve components 

of the armed forces (sec. 703) ............................................................... 655 

Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving 

inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities (sec. 704) ...... 655 

Travel for anesthesia services for childbirth for command-sponsored 

dependents of members assigned to remote locations outside the 

continental United States (sec. 705) .................................................... 655 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XII 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits—Continued 

Transitional health benefits for certain members with extension of 

active duty following active duty in support of a contingency operation (sec. 706) ....................................................................................... 656 

Provision of rehabilitative equipment under Wounded Warrior Act 

(sec. 707) ................................................................................................. 656 

Transition enrollment of Uniformed Services Family Health Plan 

Medicare-eligible retirees to TRICARE for Life (sec. 708) ................. 656 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration ....................................................... 656 

Codification and improvement of procedures for mental health evaluations for members of the armed forces (sec. 711) ............................ 656 

Extension of time limit for submittal of claims under the TRICARE 

program for care provided outside the United States (sec. 712) ........ 657 

Expansion of State licensure exception for certain health care professionals (sec. 713) .................................................................................... 657 

Clarification on confidentiality of medical quality assurance records 

(sec. 714) ................................................................................................. 657 

Maintenance of the adequacy of provider networks under the 

TRICARE program (sec. 715) ............................................................... 657 

Review of the administration of the military health system (sec. 

716) ......................................................................................................... 658 

Limitation on availability of funds for the future electronic health 

records program (sec. 717) .................................................................... 658 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters ......................................................... 659 

Modification of authorities on surveys on continued viability of 

TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra (sec. 721) .......................... 659 

Treatment of wounded warriors (sec. 722) .............................................. 659 

Report on research and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder 

(sec. 723) ................................................................................................. 659 

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 

724) ......................................................................................................... 659 

Comptroller General report on women-specific health services and 

treatment for female members of the armed forces (sec. 725) ........... 660 

Comptroller General report on contracted health care staffing for 

military medical treatment facilities (sec. 726) ................................... 660 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 660 

TRICARE Standard for certain members of the Individual Ready 

Reserve ................................................................................................... 660 

Cooperative health care agreements ........................................................ 661 

Prostate cancer imaging research initiative ............................................ 661 

Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury ................................................................................. 661 

Collaborative military-civilian trauma training programs .................... 661 

Traumatic brain injury ............................................................................. 661 

Competitive programs for alcohol and substance abuse disorders ........ 661 

Pilot program on payment for treatment of members of the armed 

forces and veterans for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic 

stress disorder ........................................................................................ 662 

Report on establishment of registry on occupational and environmental chemical concerns ..................................................................... 662 

Sense of Congress on post-traumatic stress disorder ............................. 662 

Study on breast cancer among members of the armed forces and 

veterans .................................................................................................. 662 

Transfer of Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health 

and Traumatic Brain Injury ................................................................. 662 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED

MATTERS ................................................................................................................ 663 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management .......................................... 663 

Requirements relating to core depot-level maintenance and repair 

capabilities for Milestone A and Milestone B and elimination of 

references to Key Decision Points A and B (sec. 801) ........................ 663 

Revision to law relating to disclosures to litigation support contractors (sec. 802) ......................................................................................... 663 

Extension of applicability of the senior executive benchmark compensation amount for purposes of allowable cost limitations under 

defense contracts (sec. 803) ................................................................... 663 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XIII 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED

MATTERS—Continued 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management—Continued 

Extension of availability of funds in the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund (sec. 804) ....................................................... 664 

Defense Contract Audit Agency annual report (sec. 805) ...................... 664 

Inclusion of data on contractor performance in past performance 

databases for source selection decisions (sec. 806) .............................. 664 

Implementation of recommendations of Defense Science Board Task 

Force on improvements to Service Contracting (sec. 807) .................. 664 

Temporary limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services (sec. 808) ......................................................................... 664 

Annual report on single-award task and delivery order contracts 

(sec. 809) ................................................................................................. 665 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 

and Limitations ............................................................................................. 665 

Calculation of time period relating to report on critical changes in 

major automated information systems (sec. 811) ................................ 665 

Change in deadline for submission of Selected Acquisition Reports 

from 60 to 45 days (sec. 812) ................................................................ 665 

Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery 

order contracts (sec. 813) ...................................................................... 665 

Clarification of Department of Defense authority to purchase righthand drive passenger sedan vehicles and adjustment of threshold 

for inflation (sec. 814) ............................................................................ 665 

Rights in technical data and validation of proprietary data restrictions (sec. 815) ....................................................................................... 665 

Covered contracts for purposes of requirements on contractor business systems (sec. 816) .......................................................................... 666 

Compliance with defense procurement requirements for purposes of 

internal controls of non-defense agencies for procurements on behalf of the Department of Defense (sec. 817) ...................................... 666 

Detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts (sec. 818) ........ 666 

Modification of certain requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (sec. 819) ........................................................ 666 

Inclusion of contractor support requirements in Department of Defense planning documents (sec. 820) .................................................... 667 

Amendment relating to buying tents, tarpaulins, or covers from 

American sources (sec. 821) .................................................................. 667 

Repeal of sunset of authority to procure fire resistant rayon fiber 

from foreign sources for the production of uniforms (sec. 822) .......... 667 

Prohibition on collection of political information (sec. 823) ................... 667 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs ... 668 

Waiver of requirements relating to new milestone approval for certain major defense acquisition programs experiencing critical cost 

growth due to change in quantity purchased (sec. 831) ..................... 668 

Assessment, management, and control of operating and support costs 

for major weapon systems (sec. 832) .................................................... 668 

Clarification of responsibility for cost analyses and targets for contract negotiation purposes (sec. 833) .................................................... 668 

Modification of requirements for guidance on management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs (sec. 834) ....... 668 

Management of developmental test and evaluation for major defense 

acquisition programs (sec. 835) ............................................................ 669 

Assessment of risk associated with development of major weapon 

systems to be procured under cooperative projects with friendly 

foreign countries (sec. 836) ................................................................... 669 

Competition in maintenance and sustainment of subsystems of major 

weapon systems (sec. 837) ..................................................................... 669 

Oversight of and reporting requirements with respect to Evolved 

Expendable Launch Vehicle program (sec. 838) .................................. 669 

Implementation of acquisition strategy for Evolved Expendable 

Launch Vehicle (sec. 839) ...................................................................... 669 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency 

Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan .............................................................. 670 

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy in the United States Central Command theater of operations (sec. 841) ................................... 670 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XIV 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED

MATTERS—Continued 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency 

Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan—Continued 

Additional access to contractor and subcontractor records in the 

United States Central Command Theater of Operations (sec. 842) .. 670 

Reach-back contracting authority for Operation Enduring Freedom 

and Operation New Dawn (sec. 843) .................................................... 670 

Competition and review of contracts for property or services in support of a contingency operation (sec. 844) ............................................ 671 

Inclusion of associated support services in rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for supplies (sec. 845) ........................................ 671 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund to rapidly meet urgent operational needs (sec. 846) ......................................................................... 671 

Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base Matters ................................................ 671 

Assessment of the defense industrial base pilot program (sec. 851) ..... 671 

Strategy for securing the defense supply chain and industrial base 

(sec. 852) ................................................................................................. 672 

Assessment of feasibility and advisability of establishment of rare 

earth material inventory (sec. 853) ...................................................... 672 

Department of Defense assessment of industrial base for night vision 

image intensification sensors (sec. 854) ............................................... 672 

Technical amendment relating to responsibilities of Deputy Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy 

(sec. 855) ................................................................................................. 672 

Subtitle F—Other Matters ............................................................................... 673 

Clarification of jurisdiction of the United States district courts to 

hear bid protest disputes involving maritime contracts (sec. 861) .... 673 

Encouragement of contractor Science, Technology, Engineering, and 

Math (STEM) programs (sec. 862) ....................................................... 673 

Sense of Congress and report on authorities available to the Department of Defense for multiyear contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels (sec. 863) ............................................................................ 673 

Acquisition workforce improvements (sec. 864) ...................................... 673 

Modification of delegation of authority to make determinations on 

entry into cooperative research and development agreements with 

NATO and other friendly organizations and countries (sec. 865) ...... 673 

Three-year extension of test program for negotiation of comprehensive small business subcontracting plans (sec. 866) ........................... 674 

Five-year extension of Department of Defense mentor-prote ́ge ́ program (sec. 867) ....................................................................................... 674 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 674 

Additional information on waivers under the Buy American Act by 

Department of Defense required to be included in annual report ..... 674 

Assessment of Department of Defense contracting actions and the 

impact on small business ...................................................................... 674 

Comptroller General assessment of government competition in the 

Department of Defense industrial base ............................................... 675 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on Department 

of Defense implementation of justification and approval requirements for certain sole-source contracts ................................................ 675 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on noncompetitive 

and one-offer contracts awarded by the Department of Defense ....... 676 

Definitions .................................................................................................. 676 

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement .................................................................................. 676 

Extension and expansion of small business programs of the Department of Defense ..................................................................................... 676 

Para-aramid fibers and yarns .................................................................. 677 

Procurement of photovoltaic devices ........................................................ 677 

Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs ................................... 677 

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan for security contractors operating in Afghanistan and in support of other contingency operations ...................................................................................................... 677 

Report on impact of foreign boycotts on the defense industrial base ... 678 

Reports on use of indemnification agreements ....................................... 678 

Supplier risk management ....................................................................... 678 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XV 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED

MATTERS—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Waiver of ‘‘Buy American’’ requirement for procurement of components otherwise producible overseas with specialty metal not produced in the United States ................................................................... 678 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ........... 679 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management ......................................... 679 

Revision of defense business systems requirements (sec. 901) .............. 679 

Qualifications for appointments to the position of Deputy Secretary 

of Defense (sec. 902) .............................................................................. 679 

Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal 

responsibility for airship programs (sec. 903) ..................................... 679 

Memoranda of agreement on identification and dedication of enabling 

capabilities of general purpose forces to fulfill certain requirements 

of special operations forces (sec. 904) ................................................... 679 

Assessment of Department of Defense access to non-United States 

citizens with scientific and technical expertise vital to the national 

security interests (sec. 905) ................................................................... 680 

Sense of Congress on use of modeling and simulation in Department 

of Defense activities (sec. 906) .............................................................. 680 

Sense of Congress on ties between Joint Warfighting and Coalition 

Center and Allied Command Transformation of NATO (sec. 907) .... 680 

Report on effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint 

Warfare Analysis Center on personnel skills (sec. 908) ..................... 680 

Subtitle B—Space Activities ............................................................................ 680 

Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning 

System (sec. 911) ................................................................................... 680 

Authority to designate increments or blocks of satellites as major 

subprograms subject to acquisition reporting requirements (sec. 

912) ......................................................................................................... 681 

Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters ....................................................... 681 

Report on implementation of recommendations by the Comptroller 

General on intelligence information sharing (sec. 921) ...................... 681 

Insider threat detection (sec. 922) ........................................................... 681 

Expansion of authority for exchanges of mapping, charting, and geodetic data to include nongovernmental organizations and academic 

institutions (sec. 923) ............................................................................ 682 

Ozone Widget Framework (sec. 924) ....................................................... 682 

Plan for incorporation of enterprise query and correlation capability 

into the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise (sec. 925) ....... 682 

Facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities 

abroad (sec. 926) .................................................................................... 683 

Subtitle D—Total Force Management ............................................................ 683 

General policy for total force management (sec. 931) ............................ 683 

Revisions to Department of Defense civilian personnel management 

constraints (sec. 932) ............................................................................. 683 

Additional amendments relating to total force management (sec. 

933) ......................................................................................................... 683 

Modifications of annual defense manpower requirements report (sec. 

934) ......................................................................................................... 684 

Revisions to strategic workforce plan (sec. 935) ..................................... 684 

Amendments to requirements for inventory of contracts for services 

(sec. 936) ................................................................................................. 684 

Preliminary planning and duration of public-private competitions 

(sec. 937) ................................................................................................. 684 

Conversion of certain functions from contractor performance to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 938) ... 685 

Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related Matters ............ 685 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assessment of contingency 

plans (sec. 941) ....................................................................................... 685 

Quadrennial defense review (sec. 942) .................................................... 685 

Subtitle F—Other Matters ............................................................................... 685 

Activities to improve multilateral, bilateral, and regional cooperation 

regarding cybersecurity (sec. 951) ........................................................ 685 

Report on United States Special Operations Command structure (sec. 

952) ......................................................................................................... 686 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XVI 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT—Continued 

Subtitle F—Other Matters—Continued 

Strategy to acquire capabilities to detect previously unknown cyber 

attacks (sec. 953) ................................................................................... 686 

Military activities in cyberspace (sec. 954) ............................................. 686 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 687 

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department 

of the Navy and Marine Corps ............................................................. 687 

Modification of temporary suspension of public-private competitions 

for conversion of Department of Defense functions to contractor 

performance ............................................................................................ 687 

Assessment of appropriate Department of Defense and contractor 

personnel for the Defense Medical Readiness Training Institute ..... 687 

Transfer of provisions relating to quadrennial roles and missions 

review ..................................................................................................... 687 

Revisions to the quadrennial roles and missions review ....................... 688 

Amendment to presentation of future-years budget and Comptroller 

General report on budget justification material ................................. 688 

Deadline revision for report on foreign language proficiency ................ 688 

Sense of Congress regarding the performance of commercially-available activities by Department of Defense civilian employees ............ 689 

Clarification of status of participants of defense industrial base active 

cyber defense pilot project ..................................................................... 689 

Expansion of oversight offices in Department of Defense ...................... 689 

Report on the manufacturing policy of the United States ..................... 689 

Commercial space launch cooperation ..................................................... 689 

Enhancement of authorities relating to the United States Northern 

Command and other combatant commands ........................................ 690 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS .............................................................................. 690 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters ........................................................................ 690 

General transfer authority (sec. 1001) .................................................... 690 

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002) ................................................. 691 

Additional requirements relating to the development of Financial 

Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan (sec. 1003) .......................... 691 

Display of procurement of equipment for the reserve components 

of the armed forces under estimated expenditures for procurement 

in future-years defense programs (sec. 1003A) ................................... 692 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities .............................................................. 692 

Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to 

law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities 

(sec. 1004) ............................................................................................... 692 

Three-year extension and modification of authority of Department 

of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities 

of other governmental agencies (sec. 1005) ......................................... 692 

Two-year extension and expansion of authority to provide additional 

support to counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments 

(sec. 1006) ............................................................................................... 693 

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1007) ....................................... 693 

Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counterdrug activities (sec. 1008) ...................................................................... 693 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards ...................................................... 694 

Budgeting for construction of naval vessels (sec. 1011) ......................... 694 

Sense of Congress on naming of Naval vessel after United States 

Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta (sec. 1012) ............................. 694 

Limitation on availability of funds for placing Maritime 

Prepositioning Ship squadrons on reduced operating status (sec. 

1013) ....................................................................................................... 694 

Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels 

of the Navy (sec. 1014) .......................................................................... 694 

Transfer of certain high-speed ferries to the Navy (sec. 1015) .............. 694 

Modification of conditions on status of retired aircraft carrier exJohn F. Kennedy (sec. 1016) ................................................................. 695 

Assessment of stationing of additional DDG–51 class destroyers at 

Naval Station Mayport, Florida (sec. 1017) ......................................... 695 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism ......................................................................... 695 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XVII 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism—Continued 

Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States 

to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use 

of Military Force (sec. 1021) ................................................................. 695 

Military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists (sec. 1022) .................. 695 

Procedures for periodic detention review of individuals detained at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1023) ... 696 

Procedures for status determinations (sec. 1024) ................................... 696 

Requirement for national security protocols governing detainee communications (sec. 1025) ......................................................................... 697 

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the 

United States to house detainees transferred from United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1026) ............................ 697 

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba (sec. 1027) ..................................................................................... 697 

Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign 

countries and other foreign entities (sec. 1028) .................................. 698 

Requirement for consultation regarding prosecution of terrorists (sec. 

1029) ....................................................................................................... 698 

Clarification of right to plead guilty in trial of capital offense by 

military commission (sec. 1030) ............................................................ 698 

Counterterrorism operational briefing requirement (sec. 1031) ............ 698 

National security planning guidance to deny safe havens to al-Qaeda 

and its violent extremist affiliates (sec. 1032) ..................................... 699 

Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism 

(sec. 1033) ............................................................................................... 699 

Amendments relating to the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (sec. 

1034) ....................................................................................................... 699 

Subtitle E—Nuclear Forces ............................................................................. 699 

Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear 

weapons and the nuclear command and control system (sec. 1041) . 699 

Plan on implementation of the New START Treaty (sec. 1042) ............ 700 

Annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear 

weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear 

weapons command and control system (sec. 1043) ............................. 700 

Sense of the Congress on nuclear force reductions (sec. 1044) .............. 701 

Nuclear force reductions (sec. 1045) ........................................................ 701 

Nuclear employment strategy of the United States (sec. 1046) ............ 704 

Comptroller General report on nuclear weapon capabilities and force 

structure requirements (sec. 1047) ....................................................... 704 

Report on feasibility of joint replacement fuze program (sec. 1048) ..... 705 

Subtitle F—Financial Management ................................................................ 705 

Modification of authorities on certification and credential standards 

for financial management positions in the Department of Defense 

(sec. 1051) ............................................................................................... 705 

Reliability of Department of Defense financial statements (sec. 1052) 706 

Inclusion of plan on the financial management workforce in the 

strategic workforce plan of the Department of Defense (sec. 1053) .. 706 

Tracking implementation of Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 

1054) ....................................................................................................... 706 

Subtitle G—Repeal and Modification of Reporting Requirements ............... 706 

Repeal of reporting requirements under title 10, United States Code 

(sec. 1061–1067) ..................................................................................... 706 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports .................................................................... 707 

Transmission of reports in electronic format (sec. 1068) ....................... 707 

Modifications to annual aircraft procurement plan (sec. 1069) ............. 707 

Change of deadline for annual report to Congress on National Guard 

and reserve component equipment (sec. 1070) .................................... 707 

Report on nuclear aspirations of non-state entities, nuclear weapons, 

and related programs in non-nuclear weapons states and countries 

not parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and certain 

foreign persons (sec. 1071) .................................................................... 707 

Implementation plan for whole-of-government vision prescribed in 

the National Security Strategy (sec. 1072) .......................................... 707 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XVIII 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports—Continued 

Reports on resolution restrictions on the commercial sale or dissemination of electro-optical imagery collected by satellites (sec. 1073) .. 708 

Report on integration of unmanned aerial systems into the national 

airspace system (sec. 1074) ................................................................... 709 

Report on feasibility of using unmanned aerial systems to perform 

airborne inspection of navigational aids in foreign airspace (sec. 

1075) ....................................................................................................... 709 

Comptroller General review of medical research and development 

relating to improved combat casualty care (sec. 1076) ....................... 709 

Reports to Congress on the modifications of the force structure for 

the strategic nuclear weapons delivery systems of the United 

States (sec. 1077) ................................................................................... 709 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on the major automated information system programs of the Department of Defense 

(sec. 1078) ............................................................................................... 709 

Report on Defense Department analytic capabilities regarding foreign 

ballistic missile threats (sec. 1079) ...................................................... 710 

Report on approval and implementation of Air Sea Battle Concept 

(sec. 1080) ............................................................................................... 710 

Report on costs of units of the reserve components and the active 

components of the armed forces (sec. 1080A) ...................................... 710 

Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations ................................ 710 

Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department 

of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense (sec. 1081) ... 710 

Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for data files of the 

military flight operations quality assurance systems of the military 

departments (sec. 1082) ......................................................................... 711 

Limitation on procurement and fielding of light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 1083) ................................................................ 711 

Prohibition on the use of funds for manufacturing beyond low rate 

initial production at certain prototype integration facilities (sec. 

1084) ....................................................................................................... 712 

Use of State Partnership Program Funds for certain purposes (sec. 

1085) ....................................................................................................... 712 

Subtitle J—Other Matters ............................................................................... 712 

Redesignation of psychological operations as military information 

support operations in title 10, United States Code, to conform 

to Department of Defense usage (sec. 1086) ........................................ 712 

Termination of requirement for appointment of civilian members of 

National Security Education Board by and with the advice and 

consent of the Senate (sec. 1087) .......................................................... 713 

Sense of Congress on application of moratorium on earmarks to 

this Act (sec. 1088) ................................................................................. 713 

Technical Amendment (sec. 1089) ............................................................ 713 

Cybersecurity collaboration between the Department of Defense and 

the Department of Homeland Security (sec. 1090) ............................. 713 

Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain Department 

of Defense critical infrastructure security information (sec. 1091) ... 714 

Expansion of scope of humanitarian demining assistance program 

to include stockpiled conventional munitions assistance (sec. 1092) 714 

Number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarter 

(sec. 1093) ............................................................................................... 714 

Display on annual budget requirements for organizational clothing 

and individual equipment (sec. 1094) .................................................. 714 

National Rocket Propulsion Strategy (sec. 1095) .................................... 714 

Grants to certain regulated companies for specified energy property 

not subject to normalization rules (sec. 1096) ..................................... 715 

Unmanned aerial systems and national airspace (sec. 1097) ................ 715 

Modification of dates of Comptroller General of the United States 

review of executive agreement on Joint Medical Facility Demonstration Project, North Chicago and Great Lakes, Illinois (sec. 

1098) ....................................................................................................... 715 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 716 

Mitigation of national security threats along the border of the United 

States and Mexico .................................................................................. 716 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XIX 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels 

of the Navy ............................................................................................. 716 

Definition of individual detained at Guantanamo .................................. 716 

Prohibition on family member visitation of individuals detained at 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba .............................................. 716 

Management of Department of Defense installations ............................ 716 

Prohibition on United States citizenship for detainees repatriated 

to the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, and 

the Republic of the Marshall Islands ................................................... 716 

Sense of Congress regarding the efforts by the Department of Defense to keep America safe from terrorist attacks since 9/11 ............ 717 

Trial of foreign terrorists .......................................................................... 717 

Business case analysis for Department of Defense efficiencies ............. 717 

Biennial review of required reports ......................................................... 717 

Report on homeland defense activities .................................................... 717 

Study on the recruitment, retention, and development of cyberspace 

experts .................................................................................................... 717 

Report on certain unnecessary or unwanted Department of Defense 

programs ................................................................................................. 718 

Report on a Department of Defense recycling program for rare earth 

materials ................................................................................................. 718 

Report on National Guard and reserve components of the armed 

forces ....................................................................................................... 718 

Report on status of implementation of accepted recommendations 

in the Final Report of the 2010 Army Acquisition Review Panel ...... 719 

Comptroller General report on Department of Defense science and 

technology Programs ............................................................................. 719 

Comptroller General report on Science, Technology, Engineering, and 

Math initiatives ..................................................................................... 720 

Report on effects of changing flag officer positions within the Air 

Force Materiel Command ...................................................................... 720 

Sense of Congress regarding deployment of the National Guard to 

the southwestern border of the United States .................................... 720 

Rules of engagement for members of the armed forces deployed in 

designated hostile fire areas ................................................................. 720 

Improving the transition of members of the armed forces with experience in the operation of certain motor vehicles into careers operating commercial motor vehicles in the private sector ....................... 721 

Acquisition and procurement exchanges between the United States 

and India ................................................................................................ 721 

Mandatory implementation of the standing advisory panel on improving coordination among the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the United States Agency for International 

Development on matters of national security ..................................... 722 

Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military memorials ................ 722 

Report to Congress on maintenance, repair, and overhaul capability 

of Navy unmanned aerial systems ....................................................... 722 

Sense of Congress regarding the killing of Osama bin Laden ............... 722 

Submittal of information regarding individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ................................... 722 

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain 

members of the armed forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica . 723 

Requirement that written communications from Congress be made 

public by Department of Defense ......................................................... 723 

Sense of Congress regarding deployment of armed forces without 

considerable deliberation ...................................................................... 723 

Sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a Korean War 

National Museum .................................................................................. 723 

Interagency Collaboration ........................................................................ 723 

Designation of ‘‘Taps’’ as National Song of Remembrance .................... 724 

Sense of Congress regarding United States Northern Command preparedness ................................................................................................ 724 

Closing of National Drug Intelligence Center ......................................... 724 

Sunken military craft ................................................................................ 724 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XX 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Proclamation for national day of honor to celebrate members of the 

armed forces returning from Iraq, Afghanistan, and other combat 

areas ....................................................................................................... 724 

Additional budget items ............................................................................ 724 

Continuation as a permanent program and enhancement of activities 

of Task Force for Emergency Readiness pilot program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency .................................................. 725 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS ............................................................. 725 

Subtitle A—Personnel ...................................................................................... 725 

Amendments to Department of Defense personnel authorities (sec. 

1101) ....................................................................................................... 725 

Provisions relating to Department of Defense performance management system (sec. 1102) ........................................................................ 725 

Repeal of sunset provision relating to direct hire authority at demonstration laboratories (sec. 1103) ....................................................... 725 

One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for federal civilian 

employees working overseas (sec. 1104) .............................................. 725 

Waiver of certain pay limitations (sec. 1105) .......................................... 726 

Services of post-combat case coordinators (sec. 1106) ............................ 726 

Authority to wave maximum age limit for certain appointments (sec. 

1107) ....................................................................................................... 726 

Sense of Congress relating to pay parity for federal employees serving at certain remote military installations (sec. 1108) ..................... 726 

Federal internship programs (sec. 1109) ................................................. 726 

Extension and expansion of experimental personnel program for scientific and technical personnel (sec. 1110) .......................................... 727 

Authority of the secretaries of the military departments to employ 

up to 10 persons without pay (sec. 1111) ............................................. 728 

Two-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, 

benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat 

zone (sec. 1112) ...................................................................................... 728 

Subtitle B—Other Matters .............................................................................. 728 

Modification of beneficiary designation authorities for death gratuity 

payable upon death of a United States government employee in 

service with the armed forces (sec. 1121) ............................................ 728 

Authority for waiver of recovery of certain payments previously made 

under civilian employees voluntary separation incentive program 

(sec. 1122) ............................................................................................... 728 

Extension of continued health benefits (sec. 1123) ................................. 728 

Disclosure of senior mentors (sec. 1124) .................................................. 729 

Termination of Joint Safety Climate Assessment System (sec. 1125) .. 729 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 729 

Denial of certain pay adjustments for unacceptable performance ........ 729 

Reports by Office of Special Counsel ....................................................... 729 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS ......................................... 729 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training .............................................................. 729 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 

1201) ....................................................................................................... 729 

Three-year extension of temporary authority to use acquisition and 

cross-servicing agreements to lend military equipment for personnel protection and survivability (sec. 1202) ................................... 730 

Extension and expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism (sec. 1203) ................................................. 730 

Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 

the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1204) ............................... 730 

Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities (sec. 1205) ............................................................... 731 

Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the 

Lord’s Resistance Army (sec. 1206) ...................................................... 731 

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1207) ....................................... 732 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan .............. 733 

Extension and modification of logistical support for coalition forces 

supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (sec. 1211) ............... 733 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXI 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS —Continued 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan —Continued 

One-year extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq 

and Afghanistan (sec. 1212) .................................................................. 733 

One-year extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (sec. 1213) .................................................................................... 733 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations 

or bases in Iraq and Afghanistan (sec. 1214) ...................................... 733 

Authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 1215) ...................................................... 734 

One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1216) ............................................................. 734 

Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (sec. 1217) .............................................. 734 

Two-year extension of certain reports on Afghanistan (sec. 1218) ........ 734 

Limitation on availability of amounts for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan (sec. 1219) ......................................................................... 735 

Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund (sec. 

1220) ....................................................................................................... 735 

Benchmarks to evaluate the progress being made toward the transition of security responsibilities for Afghanistan to the Government 

of Afghanistan (sec. 1221) ..................................................................... 736 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters ......................................................... 736 

Report on Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of Pakistan for operations conducted in support of Operation 

Enduring Freedom (sec. 1231) .............................................................. 736 

Review and report on Iran’s and China’s conventional and anti-access 

capabilities (sec. 1232) ........................................................................... 736 

Report on energy security of NATO alliance (sec. 1233) ........................ 736 

Comptroller General of the United States report on the National 

Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 1234) .................................... 737 

Man-portable air-defense systems originating from Libya (sec. 1235) . 737 

Report on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (sec. 1236) ....................................... 737 

Sense of Congress on non-strategic nuclear weapons and extended 

deterrence policy (sec. 1237) ................................................................. 737 

Annual report on Military and Security Developments involving the 

People’s Republic of China (sec. 1238) ................................................. 738 

Report on expansion of participation in Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot 

Training Program (sec. 1239) ............................................................... 739 

Report on Russian nuclear forces (sec. 1240) .......................................... 739 

Report on progress of the African Union in operationalizing the African Standby Force (sec. 1241) .............................................................. 739 

Defense Cooperation with Republic of Georgia (sec. 1242) .................... 740 

Prohibition on procurements from Communist Chinese military companies (sec. 1243) ................................................................................... 740 

Sharing of classified United States ballistic missile defense information with the Russian Federation (sec. 1244) ...................................... 740 

Imposition of sanctions with respect to the financial sector of Iran 

(sec. 1245) ............................................................................................... 741 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 741 

Conditional extension and modification of authority to build the capacity of counterterrorism forces of Yemen ......................................... 741 

Interagency working group on foreign police training ........................... 741 

Authority to build the capacity of certain counterterrorism forces 

of East African countries ....................................................................... 742 

Report on extension of United States-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement ........................................................................................................ 742 

Report on United States military strategy in Afghanistan in light 

of the Death of Osama Bin Laden ........................................................ 742 

National security risk assessment of United States federal debt 

owned by the People’s Republic of China ............................................ 742 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXII 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS —Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted —Continued 

Congressional notification requirement before permanent relocation 

of any United States military unit stationed outside the United 

States ...................................................................................................... 743 

International agreements relating to missile defense ............................ 743 

Certification requirement regarding efforts by Government of Pakistan to implement a strategy to counter improvised explosive devices ........................................................................................................ 743 

Rule of construction relating to the situation in Libya .......................... 744 

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation 

Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn ............................ 744 

Prohibition on United States ground combat presence in Libya ........... 744 

Repeal of the United States Institute of Peace Act ................................ 744 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION .................................................... 744 

Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds 

(sec. 1301) ............................................................................................... 744 

Funding allocations (sec. 1302) ................................................................ 744 

Limitation on availability of funds for cooperative biological engagement program (sec. 1303) ...................................................................... 745 

Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence 

in countries outside of the former Soviet Union (sec. 1304) .............. 745 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ..................................................................... 745 

Subtitle A—Military Programs ........................................................................ 745 

Working capital funds (sec. 1401) ............................................................ 745 

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402) .............................................. 746 

Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense (sec. 1403) ......... 746 

Drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, defense-wide (sec. 

1404) ....................................................................................................... 746 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405) ..................................................... 746 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406) ........................................................ 746 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile ......................................................... 746 

Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds (sec. 1411) ......... 746 

Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile (sec. 1412) ..................... 747 

Subtitle C—Other Matters .............................................................................. 747 

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(sec. 1421) ............................................................................................... 747 

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund 

for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (sec. 

1422) ....................................................................................................... 747 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 747 

Changes to management organization to the Assembled Chemical 

Weapons Alternative program .............................................................. 747 

Amendment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 ................ 748 

Annual validation of multiyear accreditation ......................................... 748 

Mission force enhancement transfer fund ............................................... 748 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS

CONTINGENGY OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 748 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations .............................. 748 

Purpose (sec. 1501) .................................................................................... 748 

Procurement (sec. 1502) ............................................................................ 748 

Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503) ....................... 749 

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504) .................................................. 749 

Military Personnel (sec. 1505) .................................................................. 749 

Working capital funds (sec. 1506) ............................................................ 749 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1507) ........................................................ 749 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1508) ....................................................................................................... 749 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1509) ..................................................... 749 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters ........................................................................ 750 

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521) ............................... 750 

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522) ...................................................... 750 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters .................................................. 750 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1531) ................. 750 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXIII 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS

CONTINGENGY OPERATIONS —Continued 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters —Continued 

Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain 

facilities projects in Iraq (sec. 1532) ..................................................... 750 

Availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1533) 750 

One-year extension of project authority and related requirements 

of Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan 

(sec. 1534) ............................................................................................... 751 

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative 

(sec. 1535) ............................................................................................... 751 

Report on lessons learned from Department of Defense participation 

on interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (sec. 1536) ....................................................................... 751 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS ................... 752 

Short title (sec. 2001) ................................................................................ 752 

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified 

by law (sec. 2002) ................................................................................... 752 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 752 

Funding tables ........................................................................................... 752 

Effective date ............................................................................................. 752 

Limitation on implementation of projects designated at various locations ........................................................................................................ 752 

TITLE XXI—ARMY .................................................................................................... 753 

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2101) ....................................................................................................... 753 

Family housing (sec. 2102) ....................................................................... 754 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2103) .................. 754 

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2104) ................................. 754 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 projects 

(sec. 2105) ............................................................................................... 754 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 projects 

(sec. 2106) ............................................................................................... 755 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects 

(sec. 2107) ............................................................................................... 755 

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects 

(sec. 2108) ............................................................................................... 755 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects (sec. 

2109) ....................................................................................................... 755 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2110) ....................................................................................................... 755 

Tour normalization (sec. 2111) ................................................................. 755 

Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications (sec. 

2112) ....................................................................................................... 756 

Reduction of Army military construction authorization (sec. 2113) ...... 756 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 756 

Additional budget items relating to Army construction and land acquisition projects .................................................................................... 756 

TITLE XXII—NAVY ................................................................................................... 756 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 756 

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2201) ....................................................................................................... 756 

Family housing (sec. 2202) ....................................................................... 757 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) .................. 757 

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204) ................................. 757 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects (sec. 

2205) ....................................................................................................... 757 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2206) ....................................................................................................... 758 

Guam realignment (sec. 2207) .................................................................. 758 

Reduction of Navy military construction authorization (sec. 2208) ...... 758 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 759 

Additional budget items relating to Navy construction and land acquisition projects .................................................................................... 759 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE ......................................................................................... 759 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 759 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXIV 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE —Continued 

Legislative Provisions Adopted —Continued 

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2301) ....................................................................................................... 759 

Family housing (sec. 2302) ....................................................................... 759 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) .................. 759 

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304) .......................... 760 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 projects 

(sec. 2305) ............................................................................................... 760 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2306) ....................................................................................................... 760 

Reduction of Air Force military construction authorization (sec. 

2307) ....................................................................................................... 760 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 760 

Limitation on implementation of consolidation of Air and Space Operations Center of the Air Force .............................................................. 760 

Additional budget items relating to Air Force construction and land 

acquisition projects ................................................................................ 761 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES .......................................................................... 761 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations .................................................. 761 

Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2401) ................................................................................. 761 

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402) .............................. 763 

Authorization of appropriations, defense agencies (sec. 2403) .............. 764 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations ................................ 764 

Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411) ............................................................... 764 

Subtitle C—Other Matters .............................................................................. 764 

Reduction of defense agencies military construction authorization 

(sec. 2421) ............................................................................................... 764 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 764 

Additional budget items relating to defense agencies construction 

and land acquisition projects ................................................................ 764 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT

PROGRAM ............................................................................................................... 764 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 764 

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2501) ....................................................................................................... 764 

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502) ............................... 765 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES ....................................... 765 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations ... 765 

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2601) ................................................................................. 765 

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2602) ............................................................................................... 765 

Authorized Navy Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2603) ............................................................................................... 765 

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2604) ................................................................................. 766 

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2605) ................................................................................. 766 

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve (sec. 

2606) ....................................................................................................... 766 

Subtitle B—Other Matters .............................................................................. 766 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project (sec. 

2611) ....................................................................................................... 766 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2612) ....................................................................................................... 767 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 and 

2009 projects (sec. 2613) ........................................................................ 767 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 767 

Additional budget items relating to Air Force Reserve construction 

and land acquisition projects ................................................................ 767 

Additional budget items relating to Air National Guard construction 

and land acquisition projects ................................................................ 767 

Additional budget items relating to Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects ........................................................ 767 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXV 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES ............................. 767 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 767 

Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 (sec. 2701) ........................................................................... 767 

Authorized Base Realignment and Closure activities funded through 

Department of Defense Base Closure account 2005 (sec. 2702) ........ 768 

Completion of specific base closure and realignment recommendations (sec. 2703) ...................................................................................... 768 

Special considerations related to transportation infrastructure in consideration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment (sec. 2704) ............................................................................. 769 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 769 

Authorization of appropriations for Base Realignment and Closure 

activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure account 2005 .............................................................................................. 769 

Reduction of military construction authorization for base realignment 

and closure activities authorized through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 ......................................................... 769 

Increased emphasis on evaluation of costs and benefits in consideration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment ........................................................................................................ 769 

Limitation on BRAC 133 project implementation .................................. 770 

Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions .................................... 770 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 

Changes ......................................................................................................... 770 

Prohibition on use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military 

construction and military family housing projects (sec. 2801) ........... 770 

Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military 

construction projects (sec. 2802) ........................................................... 770 

Protections for suppliers of labor and materials under contracts for 

military construction projects and military family housing projects 

(sec. 2803) ............................................................................................... 771 

Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States 

(sec. 2804) ............................................................................................... 771 

General military construction transfer authority (sec. 2805) ................ 771 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration ............................. 771 

Clarification of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance 

Revolving Fund for minor construction and alteration activities 

at Pentagon Reservation (sec. 2811) .................................................... 771 

Reporting requirements related to the granting of easements (sec. 

2812) ....................................................................................................... 771 

Limitations on use or development of property in Clear Zone Areas 

and clarification of authority to limit encroachments (sec. 2813) ...... 772 

Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities (sec. 

2814) ....................................................................................................... 772 

Exchange of property at military installations (sec. 2815) .................... 772 

Defense access road program enhancements to address transportation infrastructure in vicinity of military installations (sec. 2816) 772 

Subtitle C—Energy Security ........................................................................... 773 

Consolidation of definitions used in energy security chapter (sec. 

2821) ....................................................................................................... 773 

Consideration of energy security in developing energy projects on 

military installations using renewable energy sources (sec. 2822) .... 773 

Establishment of interim objective for the Department of Defense 

2025 renewable energy goal (sec. 2823) ............................................... 773 

Use of centralized purchasing agents for renewable energy certificates to reduce cost of facility energy projects using renewable 

energy sources and improve efficiencies (sec. 2824) ........................... 773 

Identification of energy-efficient products for use in construction, repair, or renovation of Department of Defense facilities (sec. 2825) ... 774 

Submission of annual Department of Defense energy management 

reports (sec. 2826) .................................................................................. 774 

Requirement for Department of Defense to capture and track data 

generated in metering Department facilities (sec. 2827) .................... 774 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXVI 

Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions —Continued 

Subtitle C—Energy Security —Continued 

Metering of Navy piers to accurately measure energy consumption 

(sec. 2828) ............................................................................................... 774 

Training policy for Department of Defense energy managers (sec. 

2829) ....................................................................................................... 774 

Report on energy-efficiency standards and prohibition on use of funds 

for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum certification (sec. 2830) ................................................................ 775 

Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment ................................. 775 

Certification of medical care coverage for H–2B temporary workforce 

on military construction projects on Guam (sec. 2841) ...................... 775 

Repeal of condition on use of specific utility conveyance authority 

regarding Guam integrated water and wastewater treatment system (sec. 2842) ....................................................................................... 775 

Subtitle E—Land Conveyances ....................................................................... 775 

Land conveyance and exchange, Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, 

Alaska (sec. 2851) .................................................................................. 775 

Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas 

(sec. 2852) ............................................................................................... 775 

Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana 

Nui areas, Hawaii (sec. 2853) ............................................................... 776 

Land exchange, Fort Bliss Texas (sec. 2854) .......................................... 776 

Land Conveyance, former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah (sec. 2855) ...... 776 

Subtitle F—Other Matters ............................................................................... 776 

Redesignation of Industrial College of the Armed Forces as the 

Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource 

Strategy (sec. 2861) ............................................................................... 776 

Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as 

Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center (sec. 2862) ...................... 776 

Prohibition on naming Department of Defense real property after 

a Member of Congress (sec. 2863) ........................................................ 776 

Notification of reductions in number of members of the armed forces 

assigned to permanent duty at a military installation (sec. 2864) .... 777 

Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under 

jurisdiction of Department of the Navy (sec. 2865) ............................ 777 

Report on the homeowners assistance program (sec. 2866) ................... 777 

Data servers and centers (sec. 2867) ....................................................... 777 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 778 

Condition on rental of family housing in foreign countries for general 

and flag officers ...................................................................................... 778 

Continuous commissioning of Department of Defense facilities to resolve operating problems, improve comfort, optimize energy use, 

and identify retrofits ............................................................................. 778 

Use of operation and maintenance funding to support community 

adjustments related to realignment of military installations and 

relocation of military personnel on Guam ........................................... 778 

Certification of military readiness need for firing range on Guam 

as condition on establishment of range ................................................ 778 

Transfer of the Air Force Memorial to the Department of the Air 

Force ....................................................................................................... 778 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ...................................... 779 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS ............ 779 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations .............................. 779 

Overview .................................................................................................... 779 

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101) .......................... 779 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102) ............................................ 780 

Other defense activities (sec. 3103) ......................................................... 780 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions and Limitations ............ 780 

Limitation on availability of funds for Center of Excellence on Nuclear Security (sec. 3111) ...................................................................... 780 

Aircraft Procurement (sec. 3112) ............................................................. 781 

Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms (sec. 3113) .................... 781 

Recognition of National Atomic Testing Museum (sec. 3114) ................ 782 

Subtitle C—Reports .......................................................................................... 782 

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3121) ............................. 782 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
Page

XXVII 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS —Continued 

Subtitle C—Reports —Continued 

Progress on nuclear nonproliferation (sec. 3122) .................................... 782 

Reports on role of nuclear security complex sites and potential efficiencies (sec. 3123) ................................................................................. 782 

Net assessment of high—performance computing capabilities of foreign countries (sec. 3124) ...................................................................... 783 

Review and analysis of nuclear waste reprocessing and nuclear reactor technology (sec. 3125) ...................................................................... 784 

Subtitle D—Other Matters .............................................................................. 784 

Sense of Congress on the use of savings from excess amounts for 

certain pension plan contributions (sec. 3131) .................................... 784 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 785 

Energy security and assurance ................................................................ 785 

Consolidated reporting requirements relating to nuclear stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure ................................... 785 

Additional budget item relating to Global Threat Reduction Initiative .......................................................................................................... 786 

Review of security vulnerabilities of national laboratory computers .... 786 

Comptroller General assessment of budget requests with respect to 

the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex .......................................................................................................... 786 

Report on feasibility of federalizing the security protective forces 

contract guard workforce at certain Department of Energy facilities ........................................................................................................... 787 

Review by Secretary of Energy and Secretary of Defense of Comptroller General study on oversight of Department of Energy defense 

nuclear facilities ..................................................................................... 787 

Plan to complete the Global Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention 

program in the Russian Federation ..................................................... 787 

TITLE XXXII—WAR RELATED NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

AUTHORIZATIONS ................................................................................................... 787 

Authorization (sec. 3201) .......................................................................... 787 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 788 

Additional funding for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board .......... 788 

Authority of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board to review 

the facility design and construction of Construction Project 10– 

D–904 of the National Nuclear Security Administration ................... 788 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES ....................................................... 788 

Authorization of appropriation (sec. 3401) .............................................. 788 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION ............................................................ 788 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 788 

Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the 

merchant marine for fiscal year 2012 (sec. 3501) ............................... 788 

Use of National Defense Reserve Fleet and Ready Reserve Force 

vessels (sec. 3502) .................................................................................. 789 

Recruitment authority (sec. 3503) ............................................................ 789 

Ship scrapping reporting requirement (sec. 3504) .................................. 789 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 789 

Strategic port assessment and report ...................................................... 789 

Maritime Administration .......................................................................... 790 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES ....................................................................... 790 

Authorization of amounts in funding tables (sec. 4001) ......................... 790 

DIVISION E—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION ...................................... 984 

Reauthorization of the SBIR and STTR programs (sec. 5001–5168) .... 984 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
71–516 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 112–329 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2012 

DECEMBER 12, 2011.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCKEON, from the committee of conference, 

submitted the following 

CONFERENCE REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 1540] 

The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the 

two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 

1540), to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military 

activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, 

and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 

military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes, having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to 

recommend and do recommend to their respective Houses as follows: 

That the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate and agree to the same with an amendment as 

follows: 

In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate 

amendment, insert the following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into five divisions as follows: 

(1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. 

(2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. 

(3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security 

Authorizations and Other Authorizations. 

(4) Division D—Funding Tables. 

(5) Division E—SBIR and STTR Reauthorization. 

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is 

as follows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
2 

Sec. 1. Short title. 

Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. 

Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on procurement of Stryker combat vehicles. 

Sec. 112. Limitation on retirement of C–23 aircraft. 

Sec. 113. Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/HH– 

60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common cockpits for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters. 

Sec. 122. Separate procurement line item for certain Littoral Combat Ship mission 

modules. 

Sec. 123. Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis on alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program. 

Sec. 124. Extension of Ford-class aircraft carrier construction authority. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Strategic airlift aircraft force structure. 

Sec. 132. Limitations on use of funds to retire B–1 bomber aircraft. 

Sec. 133. Limitation on retirement of U–2 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds for research and development relating to the B–2 bomber aircraft. 

Sec. 135. Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds to support alternative options for extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of record. 

Sec. 136. Procurement of advanced extremely high frequency satellites. 

Subtitle E—Joint and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Limitation on availability of funds for acquisition of joint tactical radio 

system. 

Sec. 142. Limitation on availability of funds for Aviation Foreign Internal Defense 

program. 

Sec. 143. F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. 

Sec. 144. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition 

program of the United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 145. Inclusion of information on approved Combat Mission Requirements in 

quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirement funds. 

Sec. 146. Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft re-engining program. 

Sec. 147. Authority for exchange with United Kingdom of specified F–35 Lightning 

II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. 

Sec. 148. Report on probationary period in development of short take-off, vertical 

landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter. 

Sec. 149. Report on plan to implement Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 

2009 measures within the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Limitation on availability of funds for the ground combat vehicle program. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on the individual carbine program. 

Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Future Unmanned Carrier-based 

Strike System. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for amphibious assault vehicles of the 

Marine Corps. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on obligation of funds for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
3 

Sec. 216. Limitation on use of funds for Increment 2 of B–2 bomber aircraft extremely high frequency satellite communications program. 

Sec. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for the Joint Space Operations Center 

management system. 

Sec. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for wireless innovation fund. 

Sec. 219. Prohibition on delegation of budgeting authority for certain research and 

educational programs. 

Sec. 220. Designation of main propulsion turbomachinery of the next-generation 

long-range strike bomber aircraft as major subprogram. 

Sec. 221. Designation of electromagnetic aircraft launch system development and 

procurement program as major subprogram. 

Sec. 222. Advanced rotorcraft flight research and development. 

Sec. 223. Preservation and storage of certain property related to F136 propulsion 

system. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Comptroller General review and assessment of missile defense acquisition 

programs. 

Sec. 233. Homeland defense hedging policy and strategy. 

Sec. 234. Ground-based midcourse defense program. 

Sec. 235. Limitation on availability of funds for the medium extended air defense 

system. 

Sec. 236. Sense of Congress regarding ballistic missile defense training. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 241. Extension of requirements for biennial roadmap and annual review and 

certification on funding for development of hypersonics. 

Sec. 242. Report and cost assessment of options for Ohio-class replacement ballistic 

missile submarine. 

Sec. 243. Report on the electromagnetic rail gun system. 

Sec. 244. Annual comptroller general report on the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program. 

Sec. 245. Independent review and assessment of cryptographic modernization program. 

Sec. 246. Report on increased budget items. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 251. Repeal of requirement for Technology Transition Initiative. 

Sec. 252. Contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology protection 

features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 253. Extension of authority for mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 254. National defense education program. 

Sec. 255. Laboratory facilities, Hanover, New Hampshire. 

Sec. 256. Sense of Congress on active matrix organic light emitting diode technology. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 

Sec. 311. Designation of senior official of Joint Chiefs of Staff for operational energy plans and programs and operational energy budget certification. 

Sec. 312. Improved Sikes Act coverage of State-owned facilities used for the national 

defense. 

Sec. 313. Discharge of wastes at sea generated by ships of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 314. Modification to the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs. 

Sec. 315. Energy-efficient technologies in contracts for logistics support of contingency operations. 

Sec. 316. Health assessment reports required when waste is disposed of in open-air 

burn pits. 

Sec. 317. Streamlined annual report on defense environmental programs. 

Sec. 318. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in 

connection with Jackson Park Housing Complex, Washington. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
4 

Sec. 319. Requirements relating to Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry investigation of exposure to drinking water contamination at Camp 

Lejeune, North Carolina. 

Sec. 320. Fire suppression agents. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Definition of depot-level maintenance and repair. 

Sec. 322. Designation of military arsenal facilities as Centers of Industrial and 

Technical Excellence. 

Sec. 323. Permanent and expanded authority for Army industrial facilities to enter 

into certain cooperative arrangements with non-Army entities. 

Sec. 324. Implementation of corrective actions resulting from corrosion study of the 

F–22 and F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 325. Modification of requirements relating to minimum capital investment for 

certain depots. 

Sec. 326. Reports on depot-related activities. 

Sec. 327. Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities. 

Subtitle D—Readiness 

Sec. 331. Modification of Department of Defense authority to accept voluntary contributions of funds. 

Sec. 332. Review of proposed structures affecting navigable airspace. 

Subtitle E—Reports 

Sec. 341. Annual certification and modifications of annual report on prepositioned 

materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 342. Additional matters for inclusion in and modified deadline for the annual 

report on operational energy. 

Sec. 343. Study on Air Force test and training range infrastructure. 

Sec. 344. Study on training range infrastructure for special operations forces. 

Sec. 345. Guidance to establish non-tactical wheeled vehicle and equipment service 

life extension programs to achieve cost savings. 

Sec. 346. Study on United States force posture in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

Sec. 347. Study on overseas basing presence of United States forces. 

Sec. 348. Inclusion of assessment of joint military training and force allocations in 

quadrennial defense review and national military strategy. 

Sec. 349. Modification of report on procurement of military working dogs. 

Subtitle F—Limitations and Extension of Authority 

Sec. 351. Adoption of military working dog by family of deceased or seriously 

wounded member of the Armed Forces who was the dog’s handler. 

Sec. 352. Prohibition on expansion of the Air Force food transformation initiative. 

Sec. 353. Designation and limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds for the 

migration of Army enterprise email services. 

Sec. 354. One-year extension of pilot program for availability of working-capital 

funds to Army for certain product improvements. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Sec. 361. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition 

components in excess of military requirements, and fired cartridge cases. 

Sec. 362. Comptroller General review of space-available travel on military aircraft. 

Sec. 363. Authority to provide information for maritime safety of forces and hydrographic support. 

Sec. 364. Deposit of reimbursed funds under reciprocal fire protection agreements. 

Sec. 365. Clarification of the airlift service definitions relative to the Civil Reserve 

Air Fleet. 

Sec. 366. Ratemaking procedures for Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts. 

Sec. 367. Policy on Active Shooter Training for certain law enforcement personnel. 

Sec. 368. Procurement of tents or other temporary structures. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
5 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2012 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for 

operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Increase in authorized strengths for Marine Corps officers on active duty 

in grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel. 

Sec. 502. General officer and flag officer reform. 

Sec. 503. National Defense University outplacement waiver. 

Sec. 504. Voluntary retirement incentive matters. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Leadership of National Guard Bureau. 

Sec. 512. Membership of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau on the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. 

Sec. 513. Modification of time in which preseparation counseling must be provided 

to reserve component members being demobilized. 

Sec. 514. Clarification of applicability of authority for deferral of mandatory separation of military technicians (dual status) until age 60. 

Sec. 515. Authority to order Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, 

and Air Force Reserve to active duty to provide assistance in response 

to a major disaster or emergency. 

Sec. 516. Authority for order to active duty of units of the Selected Reserve for 

preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands. 

Sec. 517. Modification of eligibility for consideration for promotion for reserve officers employed as military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 518. Consideration of reserve component officers for appointment to certain 

command positions. 

Sec. 519. Report on termination of military technician as a distinct personnel management category. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Sense of Congress on the unique nature, demands, and hardships of military service. 

Sec. 522. Policy addressing dwell time and measurement and data collection regarding unit operating tempo and personnel tempo. 

Sec. 523. Protected communications by members of the Armed Forces and prohibition of retaliatory personnel actions. 

Sec. 524. Notification requirement for determination made in response to review of 

proposal for award of Medal of Honor not previously submitted in timely fashion. 

Sec. 525. Expansion of regular enlisted members covered by early discharge authority. 

Sec. 526. Extension of voluntary separation pay and benefits authority. 

Sec. 527. Prohibition on denial of reenlistment of members for unsuitability based 

on the same medical condition for which they were determined to be fit 

for duty. 

Sec. 528. Designation of persons authorized to direct disposition of remains of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 529. Matters covered by preseparation counseling for members of the Armed 

Forces and their spouses. 

Sec. 530. Conversion of high-deployment allowance from mandatory to authorized. 

Sec. 531. Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance 

retention of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 533. Department of Defense suicide prevention program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
6 

Subtitle D—Military Justice and Legal Matters 

Sec. 541. Reform of offenses relating to rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 542. Authority to compel production of documentary evidence. 

Sec. 543. Clarification of application and extent of direct acceptance of gifts authority. 

Sec. 544. Freedom of conscience of military chaplains with respect to the performance of marriages. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration 

Sec. 551. Employment skills training for members of the Armed Forces on active 

duty who are transitioning to civilian life. 

Sec. 552. Enhancement of authorities on joint professional military education. 

Sec. 553. Temporary authority to waive maximum age limitation on admission to 

the military service academies. 

Sec. 554. Enhancement of administration of the United States Air Force Institute of 

Technology. 

Sec. 555. Enrollment of certain seriously wounded, ill, or injured former or retired 

enlisted members of the Armed Forces in associate degree programs of 

the Community College of the Air Force in order to complete degree program. 

Sec. 556. Reserve component mental health student stipend. 

Sec. 557. Fiscal year 2012 administration and report on the Troops-to-Teachers Program. 

Sec. 558. Pilot program on receipt of civilian credentialing for skills required for 

military occupational specialties. 

Sec. 559. Report on certain education assistance programs. 

Subtitle F—Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Sec. 561. Control and administration by Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 562. Senior Medical Advisor oversight of health care provided to residents of 

Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 563. Establishment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Advisory Council and 

Resident Advisory Committees. 

Sec. 564. Administrators, Ombudsmen, and staff of facilities. 

Sec. 565. Revision of fee requirements. 

Sec. 566. Revision of inspection requirements. 

Sec. 567. Repeal of obsolete transitional provisions and technical, conforming, and 

clerical amendments. 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 571. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 572. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 

Sec. 573. Three-year extension and enhancement of authorities on transition of military dependent students among local educational agencies. 

Sec. 574. Revision to membership of Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council. 

Sec. 575. Reemployment rights following certain National Guard duty. 

Sec. 576. Expansion of Operation Hero Miles. 

Sec. 577. Report on Department of Defense autism pilot and demonstration projects. 

Sec. 578. Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of Defense 

military spouse employment programs. 

Subtitle H—Improved Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in the Armed Forces 

Sec. 581. Access of sexual assault victims to legal assistance and services of Sexual 

Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. 

Sec. 582. Consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer based on humanitarian conditions for victim of sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 583. Director of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 

Sec. 584. Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. 

Sec. 585. Training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
7 

Sec. 586. Department of Defense policy and procedures on retention and access to 

evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of 

the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 588. Department of Defense authority to carry out personnel recovery reintegration and post-isolation support activities. 

Sec. 589. Military adaptive sports program. 

Sec. 590. Enhancement and improvement of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. 

Sec. 591. Army National Military Cemeteries. 

Sec. 592. Inspection of military cemeteries under jurisdiction of the military departments. 

Sec. 593. Authorization for award of the distinguished service cross for Captain 

Fredrick L. Spaulding for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 594. Authorization and request for award of Medal of Honor to Emil Kapaun 

for acts of valor during the Korean War. 

Sec. 595. Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to Jewish American World 

War I veterans. 

Sec. 596. Report on process for expedited determination of disability of members of 

the Armed Forces with certain disabling conditions. 

Sec. 597. Comptroller General study of military necessity of Selective Service System 

and alternatives. 

Sec. 598. Evaluation of issues affecting disposition of remains of American sailors 

killed in the explosion of the ketch U.S.S. Intrepid in Tripoli Harbor on 

September 4, 1804. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Resumption of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. 

Sec. 602. Lodging accommodations for members assigned to duty in connection with 

commissioning or fitting out of a ship. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve 

forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. 

Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. 

Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 

Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. 

Sec. 616. Modification of qualifying period for payment of hostile fire and imminent 

danger special pay and hazardous duty special pay. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Generally 

Sec. 621. One-year extension of authority to reimburse travel expenses for inactiveduty training outside of normal commuting distance. 

Subtitle D—Consolidation and Reform of Travel and Transportation Authorities 

Sec. 631. Consolidation and reform of travel and transportation authorities of the 

uniformed services. 

Sec. 632. Transition provisions. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Discretion of the Secretary of the Navy to select categories of merchandise 

to be sold by ship stores afloat. 

Sec. 642. Access of military exchange stores system to credit available through Federal Financing Bank. 

Sec. 643. Designation of Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and Meditation 

Pavilion, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, as a Fisher House. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
8 

Subtitle F—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 651. Death gratuity and related benefits for Reserves who die during an authorized stay at their residence during or between successive days of inactive 

duty training. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Sec. 661. Report on basic allowance for housing for National Guard members 

transitioning between active duty and full-time National Guard duty. 

Sec. 662. Report on incentives for recruitment and retention of health care professionals. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 

Sec. 701. Annual enrollment fees for certain retirees and dependents. 

Sec. 702. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces deployed in 

support of a contingency operation. 

Sec. 703. Behavioral health support for members of the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces. 

Sec. 704. Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities. 

Sec. 705. Travel for anesthesia services for childbirth for command-sponsored dependents of members assigned to remote locations outside the continental United States. 

Sec. 706. Transitional health benefits for certain members with extension of active 

duty following active duty in support of a contingency operation. 

Sec. 707. Provision of rehabilitative equipment under Wounded Warrior Act. 

Sec. 708. Transition enrollment of uniformed services family health plan medicareeligible retirees to TRICARE for life. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Codification and improvement of procedures for mental health evaluations 

for members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 712. Extension of time limit for submittal of claims under the TRICARE program for care provided outside the United States. 

Sec. 713. Expansion of State licensure exception for certain health care professionals. 

Sec. 714. Clarification on confidentiality of medical quality assurance records. 

Sec. 715. Maintenance of the adequacy of provider networks under the TRICARE 

program. 

Sec. 716. Review of the administration of the military health system. 

Sec. 717. Limitation on availability of funds for the future electronic health records 

program. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Modification of authorities on surveys on continued viability of TRICARE 

Standard and TRICARE Extra. 

Sec. 722. Treatment of wounded warriors. 

Sec. 723. Report on research and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Sec. 724. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General report on women-specific health services and treatment for female members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 726. Comptroller General report on contract health care staffing for military 

medical treatment facilities. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Requirements relating to core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities for Milestone A and Milestone B and elimination of references to 

Key Decision Points A and B. 

Sec. 802. Revision to law relating to disclosures to litigation support contractors. 

Sec. 803. Extension of applicability of the senior executive benchmark compensation 

amount for purposes of allowable cost limitations under defense contracts. 

Sec. 804. Extension of availability of funds in the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
9 

Sec. 805. Defense Contract Audit Agency annual report. 

Sec. 806. Inclusion of data on contractor performance in past performance databases 

for source selection decisions. 

Sec. 807. Implementation of recommendations of Defense Science Board Task Force 

on Improvements to Service Contracting. 

Sec. 808. Temporary limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 809. Annual report on single-award task and delivery order contracts. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Calculation of time period relating to report on critical changes in major 

automated information systems. 

Sec. 812. Change in deadline for submission of Selected Acquisition Reports from 60 

to 45 days. 

Sec. 813. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order contracts. 

Sec. 814. Clarification of Department of Defense authority to purchase right-hand 

drive passenger sedan vehicles and adjustment of threshold for inflation. 

Sec. 815. Rights in technical data and validation of proprietary data restrictions. 

Sec. 816. Covered contracts for purposes of requirements on contractor business systems. 

Sec. 817. Compliance with defense procurement requirements for purposes of internal controls of non-defense agencies for procurements on behalf of the 

Department of Defense. 

Sec. 818. Detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. 

Sec. 819. Modification of certain requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition 

Reform Act of 2009. 

Sec. 820. Inclusion of contractor support requirements in Department of Defense 

planning documents. 

Sec. 821. Amendment relating to buying tents, tarpaulins, or covers from American 

sources. 

Sec. 822. Repeal of sunset of authority to procure fire resistant rayon fiber from foreign sources for the production of uniforms. 

Sec. 823. Prohibition on collection of political information. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 831. Waiver of requirements relating to new milestone approval for certain 

major defense acquisition programs experiencing critical cost growth 

due to change in quantity purchased. 

Sec. 832. Assessment, management, and control of operating and support costs for 

major weapon systems. 

Sec. 833. Clarification of responsibility for cost analyses and targets for contract negotiation purposes. 

Sec. 834. Modification of requirements for guidance on management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs. 

Sec. 835. Management of developmental test and evaluation for major defense acquisition programs. 

Sec. 836. Assessment of risk associated with development of major weapon systems 

to be procured under cooperative projects with friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 837. Competition in maintenance and sustainment of subsystems of major 

weapon systems. 

Sec. 838. Oversight of and reporting requirements with respect to Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program. 

Sec. 839. Implementation of acquisition strategy for Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 841. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy in the United States Central 

Command theater of operations. 

Sec. 842. Additional access to contractor and subcontractor records in the United 

States Central Command theater of operations. 

Sec. 843. Reach-back contracting authority for Operation Enduring Freedom and 

Operation New Dawn. 

Sec. 844. Competition and review of contracts for property or services in support of 

a contingency operation. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
10 

Sec. 845. Inclusion of associated support services in rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for supplies. 

Sec. 846. Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund to rapidly meet urgent operational 

needs. 

Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 851. Assessment of the defense industrial base pilot program. 

Sec. 852. Strategy for securing the defense supply chain and industrial base. 

Sec. 853. Assessment of feasability and advisability of establishment of rare earth 

material inventory. 

Sec. 854. Department of Defense assessment of industrial base for night vision 

image intensification sensors. 

Sec. 855. Technical amendment relating to responsibilities of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 861. Clarification of jurisdiction of the United States district courts to hear bid 

protest disputes involving maritime contracts. 

Sec. 862. Encouragement of contractor Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math 

(STEM) programs. 

Sec. 863. Sense of Congress and report on authorities available to the Department 

of Defense for multiyear contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels. 

Sec. 864. Acquisition workforce improvements. 

Sec. 865. Modification of delegation of authority to make determinations on entry 

into cooperative research and development agreements with NATO and 

other friendly organizations and countries. 

Sec. 866. Three-year extension of test program for negotiation of comprehensive 

small business subcontracting plans. 

Sec. 867. Five-year extension of Department of Defense Mentor-Protege Program. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revision of defense business systems requirements. 

Sec. 902. Qualifications for appointments to the position of Deputy Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 903. Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal responsibility for airship programs. 

Sec. 904. Memoranda of agreement on identification and dedication of enabling capabilities of general purpose forces to fulfill certain requirements of special operations forces. 

Sec. 905. Assessment of Department of Defense access to non-United States citizens 

with scientific and technical expertise vital to the national security interests. 

Sec. 906. Sense of Congress on use of modeling and simulation in Department of Defense activities. 

Sec. 907. Sense of Congress on ties between Joint Warfighting and Coalition Center 

and Allied Command Transformation of NATO. 

Sec. 908. Report on effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint Warfare 

Analysis Center on personnel skills. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning System. 

Sec. 912. Authority to designate increments or blocks of satellites as major subprograms subject to acquisition reporting requirements. 

Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 

Sec. 921. Report on implementation of recommendations by the Comptroller General 

on intelligence information sharing. 

Sec. 922. Insider threat detection. 

Sec. 923. Expansion of authority for exchanges of mapping, charting, and geodetic 

data to include nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions. 

Sec. 924. Ozone Widget Framework. 

Sec. 925. Plan for incorporation of enterprise query and correlation capability into 

the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise. 

Sec. 926. Facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities abroad. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
11 

Subtitle D—Total Force Management 

Sec. 931. General policy for total force management. 

Sec. 932. Revisions to Department of Defense civilian personnel management constraints. 

Sec. 933. Additional amendments relating to total force management. 

Sec. 934. Modifications of annual defense manpower requirements report. 

Sec. 935. Revisions to strategic workforce plan. 

Sec. 936. Amendments to requirement for inventory of contracts for services. 

Sec. 937. Preliminary planning and duration of public-private competitions. 

Sec. 938. Conversion of certain functions from contractor performance to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 

Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related Matters 

Sec. 941. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assessment of contingency plans. 

Sec. 942. Quadrennial defense review. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 951. Activities to improve multilateral, bilateral, and regional cooperation regarding cybersecurity. 

Sec. 952. Report on United States Special Operations Command structure. 

Sec. 953. Strategy to acquire capabilities to detect previously unknown cyber attacks. 

Sec. 954. Military activities in cyberspace. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Additional requirements relating to the development of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan. 

Sec. 1003A. Display of procurement of equipment for the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces under estimated expenditures for procurement in futureyears defense programs. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1004. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1005. Three-year extension and modification of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities of other 

governmental agencies. 

Sec. 1006. Two-year extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Sec. 1007. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1008. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug 

activities. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1011. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels. 

Sec. 1012. Sense of Congress on naming of Naval vessel after United States Marine 

Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. 

Sec. 1013. Limitation on availability of funds for placing Maritime Prepositioning 

Ship squadrons on reduced operating status. 

Sec. 1014. Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels of the 

Navy. 

Sec. 1015. Transfer of certain high-speed ferries to the Navy. 

Sec. 1016. Modification of conditions on status of retired aircraft carrier ex-John F. 

Kennedy. 

Sec. 1017. Assessment of stationing of additional DDG–51 class destroyers at Naval 

Station Mayport, Florida. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1021. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force. 

Sec. 1022. Military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists. 

Sec. 1023. Procedures for periodic detention review of individuals detained at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
12 

Sec. 1024. Procedures for status determinations. 

Sec. 1025. Requirement for national security protocols governing detainee communications. 

Sec. 1026. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1027. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1028. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities. 

Sec. 1029. Requirement for consultation regarding prosecution of terrorists. 

Sec. 1030. Clarification of right to plead guilty in trial of capital offense by military 

commission. 

Sec. 1031. Counterterrorism operational briefing requirement. 

Sec. 1032. National security planning guidance to deny safe havens to al-Qaeda and 

its violent extremist affiliates. 

Sec. 1033. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism. 

Sec. 1034. Amendments relating to the Military Commissions Act of 2009. 

Subtitle E—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1041. Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear 

weapons and the nuclear command and control system. 

Sec. 1042. Plan on implementation of the New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1043. Annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear 

weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1044. Sense of Congress on nuclear force reductions. 

Sec. 1045. Nuclear force reductions. 

Sec. 1046. Nuclear employment strategy of the United States. 

Sec. 1047. Comptroller General report on nuclear weapon capabilities and force 

structure requirements. 

Sec. 1048. Report on feasibility of joint replacement fuze program. 

Subtitle F—Financial Management 

Sec. 1051. Modification of authorities on certification and credential standards for 

financial management positions in the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1052. Reliability of Department of Defense financial statements. 

Sec. 1053. Inclusion of plan on the financial management workforce in the strategic 

workforce plan of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1054. Tracking implementation of Department of Defense efficiencies. 

Subtitle G—Repeal and Modification of Reporting Requirements 

Sec. 1061. Repeal of reporting requirements under title 10, United States Code. 

Sec. 1062. Repeal of reporting requirements under annual defense authorization 

acts. 

Sec. 1063. Repeal of reporting requirements under other laws. 

Sec. 1064. Modification of reporting requirements under title 10, United States 

Code. 

Sec. 1065. Modification of reporting requirements under other titles of the United 

States Code. 

Sec. 1066. Modification of reporting requirements under annual defense authorization acts. 

Sec. 1067. Modification of reporting requirements under other laws. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1068. Transmission of reports in electronic format. 

Sec. 1069. Modifications to annual aircraft procurement plan. 

Sec. 1070. Change of deadline for annual report to Congress on National Guard and 

reserve component equipment. 

Sec. 1071. Report on nuclear aspirations of non-state entities, nuclear weapons, and 

related programs in non-nuclear weapons states and countries not parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and certain foreign persons. 

Sec. 1072. Implementation plan for whole-of-government vision prescribed in the 

National Security Strategy. 

Sec. 1073. Reports on resolution restrictions on the commercial sale or dissemination of eletro-optical imagery collected by satellites. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
13 

Sec. 1074. Report on integration of unmanned aerial systems into the national airspace system. 

Sec. 1075. Report on feasibility of using unmanned aerial systems to perform airborne inspection of navigational aids in foreign airspace. 

Sec. 1076. Comptroller General review of medical research and development relating 

to improved combat casualty care. 

Sec. 1077. Reports to Congress on the modification of the force structure for the strategic nuclear weapons delivery systems of the United States. 

Sec. 1078. Comptroller General of the United States reports on the major automated 

information system programs of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1079. Report on Defense Department analytic capabilities regarding foreign ballistic missile threats. 

Sec. 1080. Report on approval and implementation of Air Sea Battle Concept. 

Sec. 1080A. Report on costs of units of the reserve components and the active components of the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1081. Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense. 

Sec. 1082. Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for data files of the military 

flight operations quality assurance systems of the military departments. 

Sec. 1083. Limitation on procurement and fielding of light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 1084. Prohibition on the use of funds for manufacturing beyond low rate initial 

production at certain prototype integration facilities. 

Sec. 1085. Use of State Partnership Program funds for certain purposes. 

Subtitle J—Other Matters 

Sec. 1086. Redesignation of psychological operations as military information support operations in title 10, United States Code, to conform to Department of Defense usage. 

Sec. 1087. Termination of requirement for appointment of civilian members of National Security Education Board by and with the advice and consent of 

the Senate. 

Sec. 1088. Sense of Congress on application of moratorium on earmarks to this Act. 

Sec. 1089. Technical amendment. 

Sec. 1090. Cybersecurity collaboration between the Department of Defense and the 

Department of Homeland Security. 

Sec. 1091. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain Department of 

Defense critical infrastructure security information. 

Sec. 1092. Expansion of scope of humanitarian demining assistance program to include stockpiled conventional munitions assistance. 

Sec. 1093. Number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarters. 

Sec. 1094. Display of annual budget requirements for organizational clothing and 

individual equipment. 

Sec. 1095. National Rocket Propulsion Strategy. 

Sec. 1096. Grants to certain regulated companies for specified energy property not 

subject to normalization rules. 

Sec. 1097. Unmanned aerial systems and national airspace. 

Sec. 1098. Modification of dates of Comptroller General of the United States review 

of executive agreement on joint medical facility demonstration project, 

North Chicago and Great Lakes, Illinois. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Personnel 

Sec. 1101. Amendments to Department of Defense personnel authorities. 

Sec. 1102. Provisions relating to the Department of Defense performance management system. 

Sec. 1103. Repeal of sunset provision relating to direct hire authority at demonstration laboratories. 

Sec. 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1105. Waiver of certain pay limitations. 

Sec. 1106. Services of post-combat case coordinators. 

Sec. 1107. Authority to waive maximum-age limit for certain appointments. 

Sec. 1108. Sense of Congress relating to pay parity for Federal employees serving at 

certain remote military installations. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
14 

Sec. 1109. Federal internship programs. 

Sec. 1110. Extension and expansion of experimental personnel program for scientific 

and technical personnel. 

Sec. 1111. Authority of the Secretaries of the military departments to employ up to 

10 persons without pay. 

Sec. 1112. Two-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 1121. Modification of beneficiary designation authorities for death gratuity payable upon death of a United States Government employee in service with 

the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1122. Authority for waiver of recovery of certain payments previously made 

under civilian employees voluntary separation incentive program. 

Sec. 1123. Extension of continued health benefits. 

Sec. 1124. Disclosure of senior mentors. 

Sec. 1125. Termination of Joint Safety Climate Assessment System. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1202. Three-year extension of temporary authority to use acquisition and crossservicing agreements to lend military equipment for personnel protection 

and survivability. 

Sec. 1203. Extension and expansion of authority for support of special operations to 

combat terrorism. 

Sec. 1204. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the 

capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1205. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1206. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Sec. 1207. Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 

Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide 

defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. One-year extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or 

bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1215. Authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1216. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure 

projects in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1218. Two-year extension of certain reports on Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1219. Limitation on availability of amounts for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. 

Sec. 1221. Benchmarks to evaluate the progress being made toward the transition 

of security responsibilities for Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1231. Report on Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of 

Pakistan for operations conducted in support of Operation Enduring 

Freedom. 

Sec. 1232. Review and report on Iran’s and China’s conventional and anti-access capabilities. 

Sec. 1233. Report on energy security of the NATO alliance. 

Sec. 1234. Comptroller General of the United States report on the National Guard 

State Partnership Program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
15 

Sec. 1235. Man-portable air-defense systems originating from Libya. 

Sec. 1236. Report on military and security developments involving the Democratic 

People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1237. Sense of Congress on non-strategic nuclear weapons and extended deterrence policy. 

Sec. 1238. Annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1239. Report on expansion of participation in Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot 

Training program. 

Sec. 1240. Report on Russian nuclear forces. 

Sec. 1241. Report on progress of the African Union in operationalizing the African 

Standby Force. 

Sec. 1242. Defense cooperation with Republic of Georgia. 

Sec. 1243. Prohibition on procurements from Communist Chinese military companies. 

Sec. 1244. Sharing of classified United States ballistic missile defense information 

with the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1245. Imposition of sanctions with respect to the financial sector of Iran. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for cooperative biological engagement 

program. 

Sec. 1304. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 

countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. 

Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals 

from the National Defense Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 1422. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Defense Health Program. 

Sec. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Inspector General. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
16 

Sec. 1532. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain facilities projects in Iraq. 

Sec. 1533. Availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1534. One-year extension of project authority and related requirements of Task 

Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1535. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Sec. 1536. Report on lessons learned from Department of Defense participation on 

interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and 

Iraq. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 2001. Short title. 

Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 

Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

Sec. 2108. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 

Sec. 2110. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2111. Tour normalization. 

Sec. 2112. Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications. 

Sec. 2113. Reduction of Army military construction authorization. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 

Sec. 2205. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 

Sec. 2206. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2207. Guam realignment. 

Sec. 2208. Reduction of Navy military construction authorization. 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Modification of authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2306. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project. 

Sec. 2307. Reduction of Air Force military construction authorization. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 2421. Reduction of Defense Agencies military construction authorization. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY 

INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
17 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2613. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 and 2009 

projects. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. 

Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 

Sec. 2703. Authority to complete specific base closure and realignment recommendations. 

Sec. 2704. Special considerations related to transportation infrastructure in consideration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Prohibition on use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military construction and military family housing projects. 

Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction projects. 

Sec. 2803. Protections for suppliers of labor and materials under contracts for military construction projects and military family housing projects. 

Sec. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States. 

Sec. 2805. General military construction transfer authority. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Clarification of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for minor construction and alteration activities at Pentagon Reservation. 

Sec. 2812. Reporting requirements related to the granting of easements. 

Sec. 2813. Limitations on use or development of property in Clear Zone Areas and 

clarification of authority to limit encroachments. 

Sec. 2814. Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities. 

Sec. 2815. Exchange of property at military installations. 

Sec. 2816. Defense access road program enhancements to address transportation infrastructure in vicinity of military installations. 

Subtitle C—Energy Security 

Sec. 2821. Consolidation of definitions used in energy security chapter. 

Sec. 2822. Consideration of energy security in developing energy projects on military 

installations using renewable energy sources. 

Sec. 2823. Establishment of interim objective for Department of Defense 2025 renewable energy goal. 

Sec. 2824. Use of centralized purchasing agents for renewable energy certificates to 

reduce cost of facility energy projects using renewable energy sources 

and improve efficiencies. 

Sec. 2825. Identification of energy-efficient products for use in construction, repair, 

or renovation of Department of Defense facilities. 

Sec. 2826. Submission of annual Department of Defense energy management reports. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
18 

Sec. 2827. Requirement for Department of Defense to capture and track data generated in metering Department facilities. 

Sec. 2828. Metering of Navy piers to accurately measure energy consumption. 

Sec. 2829. Training policy for Department of Defense energy managers. 

Sec. 2830. Report on energy-efficiency standards and prohibition on use of funds for 

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum certification. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 

Sec. 2841. Certification of medical care coverage for H–2B temporary workforce on 

military construction projects on Guam. 

Sec. 2842. Repeal of condition on use of specific utility conveyance authority regarding Guam integrated water and wastewater treatment system. 

Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2851. Land conveyance and exchange, Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska. 

Sec. 2852. Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas. 

Sec. 2853. Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana Nui 

areas, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2854. Land exchange, Fort Bliss Texas. 

Sec. 2855. Land conveyance, former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 2861. Redesignation of Industrial College of the Armed Forces as the Dwight 

D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy. 

Sec. 2862. Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as Mike 

O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center. 

Sec. 2863. Prohibition on naming Department of Defense real property after a Member of Congress. 

Sec. 2864. Notifications of reductions in number of members of the Armed Forces assigned to permanent duty at a military installation. 

Sec. 2865. Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under jurisdiction of Department of the Navy. 

Sec. 2866. Report on the Homeowners Assistance Program. 

Sec. 2867. Data servers and centers. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 

AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Limitation on availability of funds for establishment of centers of excellence on nuclear security outside of the former Soviet Union. 

Sec. 3112. Aircraft procurement. 

Sec. 3113. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms. 

Sec. 3114. Recognition and status of National Atomic Testing Museum. 

Subtitle C—Reports 

Sec. 3121. Repeal of certain report requirements. 

Sec. 3122. Progress on nuclear nonproliferation. 

Sec. 3123. Reports on role of nuclear security complex sites and potential efficiencies. 

Sec. 3124. Net assessment of high-performance computing capabilities of foreign 

countries. 

Sec. 3125. Review and analysis of nuclear waste reprocessing and nuclear reactor 

technology. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3131. Sense of Congress on the use of savings from excess amounts for certain 

pension plan contributions. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
19 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the merchant marine for fiscal year 2012. 

Sec. 3502. Use of National Defense Reserve Fleet and Ready Reserve Force vessels. 

Sec. 3503. Recruitment authority. 

Sec. 3504. Ship scrapping reporting requirement. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs. 

DIVISION E—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION 

TITLE L—SHORT TITLE; DEFINITIONS 

Sec. 5001. Short title. 

Sec. 5002. Definitions. 

TITLE LI—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION 

Subtitle A—Reauthorization of the SBIR and STTR Programs 

Sec. 5101. Extension of termination dates. 

Sec. 5102. SBIR and STTR allocation increase. 

Sec. 5103. SBIR and STTR award levels. 

Sec. 5104. Agency and program flexibility. 

Sec. 5105. Elimination of Phase II invitations. 

Sec. 5106. Pilot to allow phase flexibility. 

Sec. 5107. Participation by firms with substantial investment from multiple venture 

capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms in a 

portion of the SBIR program. 

Sec. 5108. SBIR and STTR special acquisition preference. 

Sec. 5109. Collaborating with Federal laboratories and research and development 

centers. 

Sec. 5110. Notice requirement. 

Sec. 5111. Additional SBIR and STTR awards. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
20 

Subtitle B—Outreach and Commercialization Initiatives 

Sec. 5121. Technical assistance for awardees. 

Sec. 5122. Commercialization Readiness Program at Department of Defense. 

Sec. 5123. Commercialization Readiness Pilot Program for civilian agencies. 

Sec. 5124. Interagency Policy Committee. 

Sec. 5125. Clarifying the definition of ‘‘Phase III’’. 

Sec. 5126. Shortened period for final decisions on proposals and applications. 

Sec. 5127. Phase 0 Proof of Concept Partnership pilot program. 

Subtitle C—Oversight and Evaluation 

Sec. 5131. Streamlining annual evaluation requirements. 

Sec. 5132. Data collection from agencies for SBIR. 

Sec. 5133. Data collection from agencies for STTR. 

Sec. 5134. Public database. 

Sec. 5135. Government database. 

Sec. 5136. Accuracy in funding base calculations. 

Sec. 5137. Continued evaluation by the National Academy of Sciences. 

Sec. 5138. Technology insertion reporting requirements. 

Sec. 5139. Intellectual property protections. 

Sec. 5140. Obtaining consent from SBIR and STTR applicants to release contact information to economic development organizations. 

Sec. 5141. Pilot to allow funding for administrative, oversight, and contract processing costs. 

Sec. 5142. GAO study with respect to venture capital operating company, hedge 

fund, and private equity firm involvement. 

Sec. 5143. Reducing vulnerability of SBIR and STTR programs to fraud, waste, and 

abuse. 

Sec. 5144. Simplified paperwork requirements. 

Subtitle D—Policy Directives 

Sec. 5151. Conforming amendments to the SBIR and the STTR Policy Directives. 

Subtitle E—Other Provisions 

Sec. 5161. Report on SBIR and STTR program goals. 

Sec. 5162. Competitive selection procedures for SBIR and STTR programs. 

Sec. 5163. Loan restrictions. 

Sec. 5164. Limitation on pilot programs. 

Sec. 5165. Commercialization success. 

Sec. 5166. Publication of certain information. 

Sec. 5167. Report on enhancement of manufacturing activities. 

Sec. 5168. Coordination of the SBIR program and the Experimental Program to 

Stimulate Competitive Research. 

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. 

For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘congressional defense committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of 

title 10, United States Code. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on procurement of Stryker combat vehicles. 

Sec. 112. Limitation on retirement of C–23 aircraft. 

Sec. 113. Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/HH– 

60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common cockpits for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
21 

Sec. 122. Separate procurement line item for certain Littoral Combat Ship mission 

modules. 

Sec. 123. Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis on alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program. 

Sec. 124. Extension of Ford-class aircraft carrier construction authority. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Strategic airlift aircraft force structure. 

Sec. 132. Limitations on use of funds to retire B–1 bomber aircraft. 

Sec. 133. Limitation on retirement of U–2 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds for research and development relating to the B–2 bomber aircraft. 

Sec. 135. Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds to support alternative options for extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of record. 

Sec. 136. Procurement of advanced extremely high frequency satellites. 

Subtitle E—Joint and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Limitation on availability of funds for acquisition of joint tactical radio 

system. 

Sec. 142. Limitation on availability of funds for Aviation Foreign Internal Defense 

program. 

Sec. 143. F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. 

Sec. 144. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition 

program of the United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 145. Inclusion of information on approved Combat Mission Requirements in 

quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirement funds. 

Sec. 146. Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft re-engining program. 

Sec. 147. Authority for exchange with United Kingdom of specified F–35 Lightning 

II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. 

Sec. 148. Report on probationary period in development of short take-off, vertical 

landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter. 

Sec. 149. Report on plan to implement Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 

2009 measures within the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, 

the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF STRYKER COMBAT VEHICLES. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided by subsection (b), of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2012 for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, the Secretary of the Army may not procure more than 

100 Stryker combat vehicles. 

(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of the Army may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written certification by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics that— 

(1) there are validated needs of the Army requiring the 

waiver; 

(2) all Stryker combat vehicles required to fully equip the 

nine Stryker brigades and to meet other validated requirements 

regarding the vehicle have been procured or placed on contract 

for procurement; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
22 

(3) the size of the Stryker combat vehicle fleet not assigned 

directly to Stryker brigade combat teams is essential to maintaining the readiness of Stryker brigade combat teams; and 

(4) with respect to the Stryker combat vehicles planned to 

be procured pursuant to the waiver, cost estimates are complete 

for the long-term sustainment of the vehicles. 

SEC. 112. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF C–23 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon determining to retire a C–23 aircraft 

for which there has been no previously agreed upon transfer of title 

for such aircraft as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall first offer title to such aircraft to the chief 

executive officer of the State in which such aircraft is based. 

(b) TRANSFER UPON ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER.—If the chief executive officer of a State accepts title of an aircraft under subsection 

(a), the Secretary shall transfer title of the aircraft to the State without charge to the State. The Secretary shall provide a reasonable 

amount of time for acceptance of the offer. 

(c) SUSTAINMENT.—Immediately upon transfer of title to an aircraft to the State under this section, the State shall assume all costs 

associated with operating, maintaining, sustaining, and modernizing the aircraft. 

(d) AIRLIFT STUDY AND REPORT.— (1) STUDY.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, the Director of the National 

Guard Bureau, each supported commander of a combatant command, and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall conduct a study to determine the number 

of fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft required to support the 

following titles 10 and 32, United States Code, missions at low, 

medium, moderate, high, and very-high levels of operational 

risk: 

(A) Homeland defense. 

(B) Time sensitive, direct support to forces consisting of 

the regular component of the Army and the National 

Guard. 

(C) Disaster response. 

(D) Humanitarian assistance. 

(2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the study under 

paragraph (1). 

(e) GAO SUFFICIENCY REVIEW.— 

(1) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall conduct a sufficiency review of the study under subsection 

(d)(1). 

(2) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report containing the review 

under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 113. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR AIRFRAMES 

FOR ARMY UH–60M/HH–60M HELICOPTERS AND NAVY MH– 

60R/MH–60S HELICOPTERS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army 

may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 

fiscal year 2012 program year, for the procurement of airframes for 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
23 

UH–60M/HH–60M helicopters and, acting as the executive agent 

for the Department of the Navy, for the procurement of airframes for 

MH–60R/S helicopters. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for 

a fiscal year after fiscal year 2012 is subject to the availability of 

appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

SEC. 121. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR MISSION AVIONICS AND COMMON COCKPITS FOR NAVY MH–60R/S HELICOPTERS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy 

may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 

fiscal year 2012 program year, for the procurement of mission avionics and common cockpits for MH–60R/S helicopters. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for 

a fiscal year after fiscal year 2012 is subject to the availability of 

appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

SEC. 122. SEPARATE PROCUREMENT LINE ITEM FOR CERTAIN LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP MISSION MODULES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—In the budget materials submitted to the 

President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 

Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2013, and each subsequent fiscal 

year, the Secretary shall ensure that a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for each covered module that includes 

the quantity and cost of each such module requested. 

(b) FORM.—The Secretary shall ensure that any classified components of covered modules not included in a procurement line item 

under subsection (a) shall be included in a classified annex. 

(c) COVERED MODULE.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered module’’ means, with respect to mission modules of the Littoral Combat 

Ship, the following modules: 

(1) Surface warfare. 

(2) Mine countermeasures. 

(3) Anti-submarine warfare. 

SEC. 123. LIFE-CYCLE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ON ALTERNATIVE 

MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY PLANS FOR THE LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.—The Secretary of the Navy shall 

conduct a life-cycle cost-benefit analysis, in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Circular A–94, comparing alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program. 

(b) REPORT.—At the same time that the budget of the President 

is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United 

States Code, for fiscal year 2013, the Secretary of the Navy shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the costbenefit analysis conducted under subsection (a). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
24 

SEC. 124. EXTENSION OF FORD-CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY. 

Section 121(a) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) 

is amended by striking ‘‘three fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘four fiscal 

years’’. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

SEC. 131. STRATEGIC AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT FORCE STRUCTURE. 

Section 8062(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘October 1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 

2011’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘316 aircraft’’ and inserting ‘‘301 aircraft’’. 

SEC. 132. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF FUNDS TO RETIRE B–1 BOMBER 

AIRCRAFT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2012 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire any B–1 bomber aircraft on or before the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force 

submits to the congressional defense committees the plan described 

in subsection (b). 

(b) PLAN DESCRIBED.—The plan described in this subsection is 

a plan for retiring B–1 bomber aircraft that includes the following: 

(1) An identification of each B–1 bomber aircraft that will 

be retired and the disposition plan for such aircraft. 

(2) An estimate of the savings that will result from the proposed retirement of B–1 bomber aircraft in each calendar year 

through calendar year 2022. 

(3) An estimate of the amount of the savings described in 

paragraph (2) that will be reinvested in the modernization of 

B–1 bomber aircraft still in service in each calendar year 

through calendar year 2022. 

(4) A modernization plan for sustaining the remaining B– 

1 bomber aircraft through at least calendar year 2022. 

(5) An estimate of the amount of funding required to fully 

fund the modernization plan described in paragraph (4) for 

each calendar year through calendar year 2022. 

(c) POST-PLAN B–1 RETIREMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—During the period described by paragraph (4), the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain in a 

common capability configuration not less than 36 B–1 aircraft 

as combat-coded aircraft. 

(2) FY 2014 AND THEREAFTER.—After the period described in 

paragraph (4), the Secretary shall maintain not less than— 

(A) 35 B–1 aircraft as combat-coded aircraft in a common capability configuration until September 30, 2014; 

(B) 34 such aircraft as combat-coded aircraft in a common capability configuration until September 30, 2015; 

and 

(C) 33 such aircraft as combat-coded aircraft in a common capability configuration until September 30, 2016. 

(3) TOTAL AMOUNT OF RETIRED B–1 AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary may not retire more than a total of six B–1 aircraft, including the B–1 aircraft retired in accordance with this subsection. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
25 

(4) PERIOD DESCRIBED.—The period described in this paragraph is the period beginning on the date on which the plan described in subsection (b) is submitted to the congressional defense committees and ending on September 30, 2013. 

(5) COMBAT-CODED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this subsection, 

the term ‘‘combat-coded aircraft’’ means aircraft assigned to 

meet the primary aircraft authorization to a unit for the performance of its wartime mission. 

SEC. 133. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF U–2 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force may take no action that would prevent the Air Force from maintaining the U–2 

aircraft fleet in its current configuration and capability beyond fiscal year 2016 until— 

(1) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies in writing to the appropriate committees of Congress that the operating and sustainment (O&S) 

costs for the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) are 

less than the operating and sustainment costs for the U–2 aircraft on a comparable flight-hour cost basis; and 

(2) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council certifies in writing to the appropriate committees of 

Congress that the capability to be fielded at the same time or 

before the U–2 aircraft retirement would result in equal or 

greater capability available to the commanders of the combatant commands. 

(b) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 134. AVAILABILITY OF FISCAL YEAR 2011 FUNDS FOR RESEARCH 

AND DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO THE B–2 BOMBER AIRCRAFT. 

Of the unobligated balance of amounts appropriated for fiscal 

year 2011 for the Air Force and available for procurement of B–2 

bomber aircraft modifications, post-production support, and other 

charges, $20,000,000 may be available for fiscal year 2012 for research, development, test, and evaluation with respect to a conventional mixed load capability for the B–2 bomber aircraft. 

SEC. 135. AVAILABILITY OF FISCAL YEAR 2011 FUNDS TO SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR EXTREMELY HIGH FREQUENCY 

TERMINAL INCREMENT 1 PROGRAM OF RECORD. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Of the unobligated balance of amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the Air Force and available for 

procurement of B–2 bomber aircraft modifications, post-production 

support, and other charges, $15,000,000 may be available to support 

alternative options for the extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of record. 

(b) PLAN TO SECURE PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS.—Not later 

than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a plan to provide an extremely high frequency terminal 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
26 

for secure protected communications for the B–2 bomber aircraft 

and other aircraft. 

SEC. 136. PROCUREMENT OF ADVANCED EXTREMELY HIGH FREQUENCY SATELLITES. 

(a) CONTRACT AUTHORITY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force may procure two advanced extremely high frequency satellites by entering into a fixed-price contract. Such procurement may also include— 

(A) material and equipment in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable; and 

(B) cost reduction initiatives. 

(2) USE OF INCREMENTAL FUNDING.—With respect to a contract entered into under paragraph (1) for the procurement of 

advanced extremely high frequency satellites, the Secretary may 

use incremental funding for a period not to exceed six fiscal 

years. 

(3) LIABILITY.—A contract entered into under paragraph (1) 

shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make 

a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of 

appropriations for that purpose, and that the total liability to 

the Government for termination of any contract entered into 

shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at the 

time of termination. 

(b) LIMITATION OF COSTS.— (1) LIMITATION.—Except as provided by subsection (c), and 

excluding amounts described in paragraph (2), the total amount 

obligated or expended for the procurement of two advanced extremely high frequency satellites authorized by subsection (a) 

may not exceed $3,100,000,000. 

(2) EXCLUSION.—The amounts described in this paragraph 

are amounts associated with the following: 

(A) Plans. 

(B) Technical data packages. 

(C) Post-delivery and program support costs. 

(D) Technical support for obsolescence studies. 

(c) WAIVER AND ADJUSTMENT TO LIMITATION AMOUNT.— 

(1) WAIVER.—In accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary may waive the limitation in subsection (b)(1) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written 

notification of the adjustment made to the amount set forth in 

such subsection. 

(2) ADJUSTMENT.—Upon waiving the limitation under 

paragraph (1), the Secretary may adjust the amount set forth 

in subsection (b)(1) by the following: 

(A) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2011. 

(B) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or 

local laws enacted after September 30, 2011. 

(C) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of 

the satellites that are attributable to insertion of new technology into an advanced extremely high frequency satellite, 

as compared to the technology built into such a satellite 

procured prior to fiscal year 2012, if the Secretary deterVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
27 

mines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology is— 

(i) expected to decrease the life-cycle cost of the satellite; or 

(ii) required to meet an emerging threat that poses 

grave harm to national security. 

(d) USE OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR SPACE VEHICLE NUMBER 5 

FOR SPACE VEHICLE NUMBER 6.—The Secretary may obligate and 

expend amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2012 

by section 101 for procurement for the Air Force as specified in the 

funding table in section 4101 and available for the advanced procurement of long-lead parts and the replacement of obsolete parts 

for advanced extremely high frequency satellite space vehicle number 5 for the advanced procurement of long-lead parts and the replacement of obsolete parts for advanced extremely high frequency 

satellite space vehicle number 6. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the 

Secretary awards a contract under subsection (a), the Secretary 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

such contract, including the following: 

(1) The total cost savings resulting from the authority provided by subsection (a). 

(2) The type and duration of the contract awarded. 

(3) The total contract value. 

(4) The funding profile by year. 

(5) The terms of the contract regarding the treatment of 

changes by the Federal Government to the requirements of the 

contract, including how any such changes may affect the success of the contract. 

(6) A plan for using cost savings described in paragraph (1) 

to improve the capability of military satellite communications, 

including a description of— 

(A) the available funds, by year, resulting from such 

cost savings; 

(B) the specific activities or subprograms to be funded 

by such cost savings and the funds, by year, allocated to 

each such activity or subprogram; 

(C) the objectives for each such activity or subprogram 

and the criteria used by the Secretary to determine which 

such activity or subprogram to fund; 

(D) the method in which such activities or subprograms will be awarded, including whether it will be on a 

competitive basis; and 

(E) the process for determining how and when such activities and subprograms would transition to an existing 

program or be established as a new program of record. 

(f) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the 

Secretary should not enter into a fixed-price contract under subsection (a) for the procurement of two advanced extremely high frequency satellites unless the Secretary determines that entering into 

such a contract will save the Air Force not less than 20 percent over 

the cost of procuring two such satellites separately. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
28 

Subtitle E—Joint and Multiservice Matters 

SEC. 141. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ACQUISITION 

OF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for other 

procurement, Army, for covered programs of the joint tactical radio 

system, not more than 70 percent may be obligated or expended 

until the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the 

congressional defense committees written certification that the acquisition strategy for the full-rate production of covered programs of 

such radio system includes full and open competition (as defined in 

section 2302(3)(D) of title 10, United States Code) that includes 

commercially developed systems that the Secretary determines are 

qualified with respect to successful testing by the Army and certification by the National Security Agency. 

(b) LRIP.—The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply 

to the low-rate initial production of covered programs. 

(c) COVERED PROGRAMS.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered programs’’ means, with respect to the joint tactical radio system, the 

following: 

(1) The ground mobile radio. 

(2) The handheld, manpack, and small form fit. 

SEC. 142. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AVIATION 

FOREIGN INTERNAL DEFENSE PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the procurement of fixed-wing non-standard aviation aircraft in support of 

the aviation foreign internal defense program, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days 

after the date on which the Commander of the United States Special 

Operations Command submits the report under subsection (b)(1). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than March 15, 2012, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the aviation foreign internal defense program. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) An overall description of the program, including its 

goals and proposed metrics of performance success. 

(B) The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiencies reviews for contracts awarded for the aviation foreign internal defense program. 

(C) An assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of procuring new aircraft, procuring used aircraft, or 

leasing aircraft to meet mission requirements, including an 

explanation of any efficiencies and savings. 

(D) A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying 

the overall projected growth of the aviation foreign internal 

defense program to satisfy the increased requirements of the 

commanders of the geographic combatant commands. 

(E) An examination of efficiencies that could be gained 

by procuring platforms such as those being procured for 

light mobility aircraft. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
29 

(3) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 143. F–35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER AIRCRAFT. 

In entering into a contract for the procurement of aircraft for 

the sixth and all subsequent low-rate initial production contract lots 

for the F–35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, the Secretary 

of Defense shall ensure each of the following: 

(1) That the contract is a fixed-price contract. 

(2) That the contract requires the contractor to assume full 

responsibility for costs under the contract above the target cost 

specified in the contract. 

SEC. 144. ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERSEA MOBILITY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OF THE UNITED 

STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

(a) LIMITATION ON MILESTONE B DECISION.—The Commander 

of the United States Special Operations Command may not make 

any milestone B acquisition decisions with respect to a covered element until a 30-day period has elapsed after the date on which the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics— 

(1) conducts the assessment and determination under subsection (b) for the covered element; and 

(2) submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

including— 

(A) the determination of the Under Secretary with respect to the appropriate acquisition category for the covered 

element; and 

(B) the validated requirements, independent cost estimate, test and evaluation master plan, and technology 

readiness assessment described in paragraphs (1) through 

(4) of subsection (b), respectively. 

(b) ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION.—With respect to each 

covered element, the Under Secretary shall conduct an assessment 

and determination of whether to treat the covered element as a 

major defense acquisition program. Such assessment shall include— 

(1) a requirements validation by the Joint Requirements 

Oversight Council; 

(2) an independent cost estimate prepared by the Director 

of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation; 

(3) a test and evaluation master plan reviewed by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation; and 

(4) a technology readiness assessment reviewed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. 

(c) COVERED ELEMENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered element’’ means any of the following elements of the undersea 

mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command: 

(1) The dry combat submersible-light program. 

(2) The dry combat submersible-medium program. 

(3) The next-generation submarine shelter program. 

(4) Any new dry combat submersible developed under the 

undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States 

Special Operations Command after the date of the enactment of 

this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
30 

SEC. 145. INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON APPROVED COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS IN QUARTERLY REPORTS ON USE 

OF COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENT FUNDS. 

Section 123(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4159; 

10 U.S.C. 167 note) is amended by adding at the end the following 

new paragraphs: 

‘‘(6) A table setting forth the Combat Mission Requirements 

approved during the fiscal year in which such report is submitted and the two preceding fiscal years, including for each 

such Requirement— 

‘‘(A) the title of such Requirement; 

‘‘(B) the date of approval of such Requirement; and 

‘‘(C) the amount of funding approved for such Requirement, and the source of such approved funds. 

‘‘(7) A statement of the amount of any unspent Combat Mission Requirements funds from the fiscal year in which such report is submitted and the two preceding fiscal years.’’. 

SEC. 146. JOINT SURVEILLANCE TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM AIRCRAFT RE-ENGINING PROGRAM. 

(a) REPORT ON AUDIT OF FUNDS FOR PROGRAM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Air Force Audit Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees the results of a financial audit of the funds previously authorized and appropriated for the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System 

(JSTARS) aircraft re-engining program. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report on the audit required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) A description of how the funds described in that 

paragraph were expended, including— 

(i) an assessment of the existence, completeness, 

and cost of the assets acquired with such funds; and 

(ii) an assessment of the costs that were capitalized 

as military equipment and inventory and the cost characterized as operating expenses (including payroll, 

freight and shipment, inspection, and other operating 

costs). 

(B) A statement of the amount of such funds that remain in the original budget lines. 

(C) A statement of the amount of such funds that were 

reprogrammed or expired, and in which accounts. 

(b) USE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall take 

appropriate actions to ensure that funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for JSTARS aircraft, and any funds described 

by subsection (a)(2)(B), are obligated and expended for the purposes 

for which authorized and appropriated, including, but not limited 

to, the installation of one engine shipset on an operational JSTARS 

aircraft. 

SEC. 147. AUTHORITY FOR EXCHANGE WITH UNITED KINGDOM OF 

SPECIFIED F–35 LIGHTNING II JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 

AIRCRAFT. 

(a) AUTHORITY.— 

(1) EXCHANGE AUTHORITY.—In accordance with subsection 

(c), the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the United KingVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
31 

dom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (in this section referred to as the ‘‘United Kingdom’’) all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to an aircraft described in paragraph (2) in exchange for the transfer by the United Kingdom 

to the United States of all right, title, and interest of the United 

Kingdom in and to an aircraft described in paragraph (3). The 

Secretary may execute the exchange under this section on behalf 

of the United States only with the concurrence of the Secretary 

of State. 

(2) AIRCRAFT TO BE EXCHANGED BY UNITED STATES.—The 

aircraft authorized to be transferred by the United States under 

this subsection is an F–35 Lightning II aircraft in the Carrier 

Variant configuration acquired by the United States for the Marine Corps under a future Joint Strike Fighter program contract referred to as the Low-Rate Initial Production 6 contract. 

(3) AIRCRAFT TO BE EXCHANGED BY UNITED KINGDOM.—The 

aircraft for which the exchange under paragraph (1) may be 

made is an F–35 Lightning II aircraft in the Short-Take Off 

and Vertical Landing configuration that, as of November 19, 

2010, is being acquired on behalf of the United Kingdom under 

an existing Joint Strike Fighter program contract referred to as 

the Low-Rate Initial Production 4 contract. 

(b) FUNDING FOR PRODUCTION OF AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) FUNDING SOURCES FOR AIRCRAFT TO BE EXCHANGED BY

UNITED STATES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B), funds for production of the aircraft to be transferred by 

the United States (including the propulsion system, long 

lead-time materials, the production build, and deficiency 

corrections) may be derived from appropriations for Aircraft Procurement, Navy, for the aircraft under the contract 

referred to in subsection (a)(2). 

(B) EXCEPTION.—Costs for flight test instrumentation 

of the aircraft to be transferred by the United States and 

any other non-recurring and recurring costs for that aircraft associated with unique requirements of the United 

Kingdom may not be borne by the United States. 

(2) FUNDING SOURCES FOR AIRCRAFT TO BE EXCHANGED BY

UNITED KINGDOM.—Costs for upgrades and modifications of the 

aircraft to be transferred to the United States that are necessary 

to bring that aircraft to the Low-Rate Initial Production 6 configuration under the contract referred to in subsection (a)(2) 

may not be borne by the United States. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION.—The exchange under this section shall be 

implemented pursuant to the memorandum of understanding titled 

‘‘Joint Strike Fighter Production, Sustainment, and Follow-on Development Memorandum of Understanding’’, which entered into effect among nine nations including the United States and the United 

Kingdom on December 31, 2006, consistent with section 27 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2767), and as supplemented as 

necessary by the United States and the United Kingdom. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
32 

SEC. 148. REPORT ON PROBATIONARY PERIOD IN DEVELOPMENT OF 

SHORT TAKE-OFF, VERTICAL LANDING VARIANT OF THE 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER. 

Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the development of the short take-off, 

vertical landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter (otherwise 

known as the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter) that includes the following: 

(1) An identification of the criteria that the Secretary determines must be satisfied before the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter 

can be removed from the two-year probationary status imposed 

by the Secretary on or about January 6, 2011. 

(2) A mid-probationary period assessment of— 

(A) the performance of the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter 

based on the criteria described in paragraph (1); and 

(B) the technical issues that remain in the development 

program for the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter. 

(3) A plan for how the Secretary intends to resolve the 

issues described in paragraph (2)(B) before January 6, 2013. 

SEC. 149. REPORT ON PLAN TO IMPLEMENT WEAPON SYSTEMS ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2009 MEASURES WITHIN THE 

JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER AIRCRAFT PROGRAM. 

At the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 

2013 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, 

United States Code, the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on 

the plans of the Department of Defense to implement the requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23), and the amendments made by that Act, within the 

Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft program. The report shall set 

forth the following: 

(1) Specific goals for implementing the requirements of the 

Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, and the 

amendments made by that Act, within the Joint Strike Fighter 

aircraft program. 

(2) A schedule for achieving each goal set forth under paragraph (1) for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 

EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Limitation on availability of funds for the ground combat vehicle program. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on the individual carbine program. 

Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Future Unmanned Carrier-based 

Strike System. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for amphibious assault vehicles of the 

Marine Corps. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on obligation of funds for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program. 

Sec. 216. Limitation on use of funds for Increment 2 of B–2 bomber aircraft extremely high frequency satellite communications program. 

Sec. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for the Joint Space Operations Center 

management system. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
33 

Sec. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for wireless innovation fund. 

Sec. 219. Prohibition on delegation of budgeting authority for certain research and 

educational programs. 

Sec. 220. Designation of main propulsion turbomachinery of the next-generation 

long-range strike bomber aircraft as major subprogram. 

Sec. 221. Designation of electromagnetic aircraft launch system development and 

procurement program as major subprogram. 

Sec. 222. Advanced rotorcraft flight research and development. 

Sec. 223. Preservation and storage of certain property related to F136 propulsion 

system. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Comptroller General review and assessment of missile defense acquisition 

programs. 

Sec. 233. Homeland defense hedging policy and strategy. 

Sec. 234. Ground-based midcourse defense program. 

Sec. 235. Limitation on availability of funds for the medium extended air defense 

system. 

Sec. 236. Sense of Congress regarding ballistic missile defense training. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 241. Extension of requirements for biennial roadmap and annual review and 

certification on funding for development of hypersonics. 

Sec. 242. Report and cost assessment of options for Ohio-class replacement ballistic 

missile submarine. 

Sec. 243. Report on the electromagnetic rail gun system. 

Sec. 244. Annual comptroller general report on the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program. 

Sec. 245. Independent review and assessment of cryptographic modernization program. 

Sec. 246. Report on increased budget items. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 251. Repeal of requirement for Technology Transition Initiative. 

Sec. 252. Contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology protection 

features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 253. Extension of authority for mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 254. National defense education program. 

Sec. 255. Laboratory facilities, Hanover, New Hampshire. 

Sec. 256. Sense of Congress on active matrix organic light emitting diode technology. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and 

Limitations 

SEC. 211. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE GROUND 

COMBAT VEHICLE PROGRAM. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for research, development, 

test, and evaluation, Army, for the ground combat vehicle program, 

not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the 

date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing— 

(1) the plans of the Secretary to carry out— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
34 

(A) a dynamic analysis of alternatives update described 

in the acquisition decision memorandum issued by the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics on August 17, 2011; and 

(B) a separate assessment of selected non-developmental vehicles described in such memorandum; and 

(2) a description of the resources the Secretary considers 

necessary to carry out the plans under paragraph (1), including 

the amount of funding required in fiscal years 2012 and 2013. 

SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON THE INDIVIDUAL CARBINE PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

and except as provided by subsection (b), the individual carbine program may not receive Milestone C approval (as defined in section 

2366(e)(8) of title 10, United States Code) until the date on which 

the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a business case assessment of such program, including, at 

a minimum, comparisons of the capabilities and costs of— 

(1) commercially available weapon systems as of the date of 

the assessment, including complete weapon systems and kits to 

apply to existing weapon systems; and 

(2) weapon systems that are fielded as of the date of the assessment that include any required improvements. 

(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may waive 

the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the 

congressional defense committees written certification that the waiver is in the national security interests of the United States. 

SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the Future Unmanned Carrier-based Strike System, not more than 75 percent may 

be obligated or expended until the date that is 60 days after the date 

on which— 

(1) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council certifies to the congressional defense committees that— 

(A) such system is required to fill a validated capability gap of the Department of Defense; and 

(B) the Council has reviewed and approved the initial 

capability and development document relating to such system; 

(2) the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition submits to the congressional defense 

committees a report containing— 

(A) a delineation of threshold and objective key performance parameters; 

(B) a certification that the threshold and objective key 

performance parameters for such system have been established and are achievable; and 

(C) a description of the requirements of such system 

with respect to— 

(i) weapons payload; 

(ii) intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance 

equipment; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
35 

(iii) electronic attack and electronic protection 

equipment; 

(iv) communications equipment; 

(v) range; 

(vi) mission endurance for un-refueled and aerial 

refueled operations; 

(vii) low-observability characteristics; 

(viii) affordability; 

(ix) survivability; and 

(x) interoperability with other Navy and joint-service unmanned aerial systems and mission control stations; and 

(3) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to the congressional defense committees that— 

(A) the Secretary of the Navy has completed a comprehensive analysis of alternatives for such system; 

(B) the acquisition strategy of the Secretary for the 

technology development and initial fielding phases of such 

system is achievable and presents medium, or less, risk 

with respect to cost, schedule, funding, and testing program; 

(C) such acquisition strategy integrates a fair and open 

competitive acquisition strategy environment for all potential competitors; 

(D) the data, information, and lessons learned from the 

Unmanned Carrier-based Aircraft System of the Navy are 

sufficiently integrated into the acquisition strategy of the 

Future Unmanned Carrier-based Strike System and that 

the level of concurrency between the programs is prudent 

and reasonable; 

(E) the Secretary has sufficient fiscal resources budgeted in the future years defense plan and extended planning 

period that supports the acquisition strategy described in 

subparagraph (B); and 

(F) the acquisition strategy— 

(i) complies with the Weapon Systems Acquisition 

Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23), and the 

amendments made by that Act, and Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02; and 

(ii) requires the implementation of open architecture standards. 

(b) GAO BRIEFING.—Not later than 90 days after the date on 

which the certifications and report under subsection (a) are received 

by the congressional defense committees, the Comptroller General of 

the United States shall brief the congressional defense committees 

on an evaluation of the acquisition strategy of the Secretary of the 

Navy for the Future Unmanned Carrier-based Strike System. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a)(2) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS 

ASSAULT VEHICLES OF THE MARINE CORPS. 

(a) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—Except as provided by subsections (d) and (e), none of the funds authorized to be approVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
36 

priated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2012 for procurement, Marine Corps, or research, development, 

test, and evaluation, Navy, may be obligated or expended for 

the amphibious programs described in subsection (c) until the 

date on which the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with 

the Commandant of the Marine Corps, submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing— 

(A) written certification of the requirements for amphibious assault vehicles of the Marine Corps, based on the 

needs of the commanders of the combatant commands, relating to— 

(i) the distance from the shore needed to begin an 

amphibious assault; 

(ii) the speed at which the vehicle must travel in 

order to reach the shore in the time required for such 

assault; and 

(iii) the armor requirements for all potential combat environments, including the possible use of 

applique ́ armor; and 

(B) the analysis of alternatives conducted under subsection (b)(1). 

(2) LIMITATION ON MPC MILESTONE B.—Milestone B approval may not be granted for the Marine Personnel Carrier 

until 30 days after the date on which the report under paragraph (1) is submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

(b) ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES.— 

(1) ANALYSIS.—The Secretary of the Navy, in coordination 

with the Commandant of the Marine Corps, shall conduct an 

analysis of alternatives of the amphibious assault vehicles described in paragraph (2). With respect to such vehicles, such 

analysis shall include— 

(A) comparisons of the capabilities and total lifecycle 

ownership costs (including costs with respect to research, 

development, test, and evaluation, procurement, and operation and maintenance); and 

(B) an independent review of the analysis of cost prepared by a federally funded research and development center. 

(2) AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLES DESCRIBED.—The amphibious assault vehicles described in this paragraph are amphibious assault vehicles that— 

(A) meet the requirements described in subsection 

(a)(1)(A), including— 

(i) an upgraded assault amphibious vehicle 7A1; 

(ii) the expeditionary fighting vehicle; and 

(iii) a new amphibious combat vehicle; and 

(B) include at least one vehicle that is capable of accelerating until the vehicle moves along the top of the water 

(commonly known as ‘‘getting up on plane’’) and at least 

one vehicle that is not capable of such acceleration. 

(c) AMPHIBIOUS PROGRAMS DESCRIBED.—The amphibious programs described in this subsection are the following: 

(1) The assault amphibious vehicle 7A1, program element 

206623M. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
37 

(2) The Marine Corps assault vehicle, program element 

603611M. 

(3) The termination of the expeditionary fighting vehicle 

program. 

(d) AAV7A1 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.—The limitation in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to funds made available for procurement, Marine Corps, for the procurement of— 

(1) an assault amphibious vehicle 7A1 with— 

(A) survivability upgrades under the survivability 

product improvement program; or 

(B) other necessary survivability capabilities that are 

in response to urgent operational needs; or 

(2) improvements to a previously procured assault amphibious vehicle 7A1 that address safety of use, environmental inhabitability, and operational availability. 

(e) MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLE, PROGRAM ELEMENT

603611M.—The limitation in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to 

funds made available for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the Marine Corps assault vehicle, program element 

603611M, to— 

(1) conduct an analysis of alternatives and supporting analytical activities; or 

(2) conduct technology integration development and engineering to— 

(A) refine and validate requirements; and 

(B) reduce cost, schedule, and technical risk prior to 

the initiation of the amphibious combat vehicle program. 

(f) ASSESSMENT ON HABITABILITY.—Not later than 60 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a habitability assessment with respect to the period of time a member of the Armed 

Forces can spend in the back of an amphibious assault vehicle that 

is not ‘‘up on plane’’ while still remaining combat effective. Such assessment shall cover a set of operationally relevant speeds and 

ranges. The Secretary shall include the results and information 

from any recently performed tests related to such assessment. 

SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR THE F–35 

LIGHTNING II AIRCRAFT PROGRAM. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for research and development for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program, not more that 80 

percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the 

Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees 

that the acquisition strategy for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft includes a plan for achieving competition throughout operation and 

sustainment, in accordance with section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 

2430 note). 

SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR INCREMENT 2 OF B–2 

BOMBER AIRCRAFT EXTREMELY HIGH FREQUENCY SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 201 for 

research, development, test, and evaluation for the Air Force as 

specified in the funding table in section 4201 and available for Increment 2 of the B–2 bomber aircraft extremely high frequency satVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
38 

ellite communications program, not more than 40 percent may be 

obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date 

on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 

defense committees the following: 

(1) The certification of the Secretary that— 

(A) the United States Government will own the data 

rights to any extremely high frequency active electronically 

steered array antenna developed for use as part of a system 

to support extremely high frequency protected satellite communications for the B–2 bomber aircraft; and 

(B) the use of an extremely high frequency active electronically steered array antenna is the most cost effective 

and lowest risk option available to support extremely high 

frequency satellite communications for the B–2 bomber aircraft. 

(2) A detailed plan setting forth the projected cost and 

schedule for research, development, and testing on the extremely 

high frequency active electronically steered array antenna. 

SEC. 217. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JOINT 

SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) improvements to the space situational awareness and 

space command and control capabilities of the United States 

are necessary; and 

(2) the traditional defense acquisition process is not optimal 

for developing the services-oriented architecture and net-centric 

environment planned for the Joint Space Operations Center 

management system. 

(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 

for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for release one of the Joint Space Operations Center management system 

may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary 

of the Air Force and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics jointly submit to the congressional defense committees the acquisition strategy for such management system, including— 

(1) a description of the acquisition policies and procedures 

applicable to such management system; and 

(2) a description of any additional acquisition authorities 

necessary to ensure that such management system is able to implement a services-oriented architecture and net-centric environment for space situational awareness and space command and 

control. 

SEC. 218. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR WIRELESS INNOVATION FUND. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the wireless innovation 

fund within the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, not 

more than 10 percent may be obligated or expended until the date 

that is 30 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees a report on how such fund will be 

managed and executed, including— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
39 

(1) a concept of operation for how such fund will operate, 

particularly with regards to supporting the interagency community; 

(2) a description of— 

(A) the governance structure, including how decisionmaking with interagency partners will be conducted; 

(B) the funding mechanism for interagency collaborators; 

(C) the metrics for measuring the performance and effectiveness of the program; and 

(D) the reporting mechanisms to provide oversight of 

the fund by the Department of Defense, the interagency 

partners, and Congress; and 

(3) any other matters the Under Secretary considers appropriate. 

SEC. 219. PROHIBITION ON DELEGATION OF BUDGETING AUTHORITY 

FOR CERTAIN RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS. 

(a) PROHIBITION ON DELEGATION.—Subsection (a) of section 

2362 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

The Secretary of Defense’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense may not delegate or transfer to an 

individual outside the Office of the Secretary of Defense the authority regarding the programming or budgeting of the program established by this section that is carried out by the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense for Research and Engineering.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section 2362 is amended 

further— 

(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘established under subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘established by subsection (a)(1)’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1)’’. 

SEC. 220. DESIGNATION OF MAIN PROPULSION TURBOMACHINERY OF 

THE NEXT-GENERATION LONG-RANGE STRIKE BOMBER 

AIRCRAFT AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAM. 

(a) DESIGNATION AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAM.—Not later than 30 

days after the date on which the next-generation long-range strike 

bomber aircraft receives Milestone A approval, the Secretary of Defense shall designate the development and procurement of the main 

propulsion turbomachinery of the next-generation long-range strike 

bomber aircraft as a major subprogram of the next-generation longrange strike bomber aircraft major defense acquisition program, in 

accordance with section 2430a of title 10, United States Code. 

(b) COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION STRATEGY.—The Secretary of the 

Air Force shall develop an acquisition strategy for the major subprogram designated in subsection (a) that is in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) of section 202 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1720; 10 

U.S.C. 2430 note). 

SEC. 221. DESIGNATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC AIRCRAFT LAUNCH 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND PROCUREMENT PROGRAM AS 

MAJOR SUBPROGRAM. 

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate the electromagnetic airVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
40 

craft launch development and procurement program as a major subprogram of the CVN–78 Ford-class aircraft carrier major defense 

acquisition program, in accordance with section 2430a of title 10, 

United States Code. The Secretary may cease such designation after 

the date on which the electromagnetic aircraft launch system is certified as operationally effective and suitable by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 

SEC. 222. ADVANCED ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 

(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may 

conduct a program for flight research and demonstration of advanced rotorcraft technology. 

(b) GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.—The goals and objectives of the 

program authorized by subsection (a) are as follows: 

(1) To flight demonstrate the ability of advanced rotorcraft 

technology to expand the flight envelope and improve the speed, 

range, payload, ceiling, survivability, reliability, and affordability of current and future rotorcraft of the Department of Defense. 

(2) To mature advanced rotorcraft technology and obtain 

flight-test data to— 

(A) support the assessment of such technology for future rotorcraft platform development programs of the Department; and 

(B) have the ability to add such technology to the existing rotorcraft of the Department to extend the capability 

and life of such rotorcraft until next-generation platforms 

are fielded. 

(c) ELEMENTS OF PROGRAM.—The program authorized by subsection (a) may include— 

(1) integration and demonstration of advanced rotorcraft 

technology to meet the goals and objectives described in subsection (b); and 

(2) flight demonstration of the advanced rotorcraft technology test bed under the experimental airworthiness process of 

the Federal Aviation Administration or other appropriate airworthiness process approved by the Secretary of Defense. 

(d) COMPETITION.—In awarding a contract under this section, 

the Secretary shall use competitive procedures in accordance with 

the requirements of section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, and 

shall consider a timely offer submitted by a small business concern 

(as defined in section 2225(f)(3) of such title) in accordance with the 

specifications and evaluation factors specified in the solicitation. 

SEC. 223. PRESERVATION AND STORAGE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY RELATED TO F136 PROPULSION SYSTEM. 

(a) PLAN.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for the 

disposition of property owned by the Federal Government that was 

acquired under the F136 propulsion system development contract. 

The plan shall— 

(1) ensure that the Secretary preserves and stores, uses, or 

disposes of such property in a manner that— 

(A) provides for the long-term sustainment and repair 

of such property pending the determination by the Department of Defense that such property— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
41 

(i) can be used within the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program, in other Government development programs, or in other contractor-funded development activities; 

(ii) can be stored for use in future Government development programs; or 

(iii) should be disposed; and 

(B) allows for such preservation and storage of identified property to be conducted at either the facilities of the 

Federal Government or a contractor under such contract; 

and 

(2) identify any contract modifications, additional facilities, 

or funding that the Secretary determines necessary to carry out 

the plan. 

(b) RESTRICTION ON THE USE OF FUNDS.—None of the amounts 

authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air 

Force, for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program may be obligated 

or expended for activities related to destroying or disposing of the 

property described in subsection (a) until the date that is 30 days 

after the date on which the report under subsection (c) is submitted 

to the congressional defense committees. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plan under subsection 

(a). That report shall describe how the Secretary intends to obtain 

maximum benefit to the Federal Government from the investment 

already made in developing the F136. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

SEC. 231. ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS ON THE BALLISTIC 

MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) BASELINE REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 224 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic 

missile defense system 

‘‘(a) BASELINES REQUIRED.—(1) In accordance with paragraph 

(2), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall establish and 

maintain an acquisition baseline for— 

‘‘(A) each program element of the ballistic missile defense 

system, as specified in section 223 of this title; and 

‘‘(B) each designated major subprogram of such program 

elements. 

‘‘(2) The Director shall establish an acquisition baseline required by paragraph (1) before the date on which the program element or major subprogram enters— 

‘‘(A) engineering and manufacturing development (or its 

equivalent); and 

‘‘(B) production and deployment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
42 

‘‘(3) Except as provided by subsection (d), the Director may not 

adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this section. 

‘‘(b) ELEMENTS OF BASELINES.—Each acquisition baseline required by subsection (a) for a program element or major subprogram shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) A comprehensive schedule, including— 

‘‘(A) research and development milestones; 

‘‘(B) acquisition milestones, including design reviews 

and key decision points; 

‘‘(C) key test events, including ground and flight tests 

and ballistic missile defense system tests; 

‘‘(D) delivery and fielding schedules; 

‘‘(E) quantities of assets planned for acquisition and 

delivery in total and by fiscal year; and 

‘‘(F) planned contract award dates. 

‘‘(2) A detailed technical description of— 

‘‘(A) the capability to be developed, including hardware 

and software; 

‘‘(B) system requirements, including performance requirements; 

‘‘(C) how the proposed capability satisfies a capability 

identified by the commanders of the combatant commands 

on a prioritized capabilities list; 

‘‘(D) key knowledge points that must be achieved to permit continuation of the program and to inform production 

and deployment decisions; and 

‘‘(E) how the Director plans to improve the capability 

over time. 

‘‘(3) A cost estimate, including— 

‘‘(A) a life-cycle cost estimate that separately identifies 

the costs regarding research and development, procurement, 

military construction, operations and sustainment, and disposal; 

‘‘(B) program acquisition unit costs for the program element; 

‘‘(C) average procurement unit costs and program acquisition costs for the program element; and 

‘‘(D) an identification of when the document regarding 

the program joint cost analysis requirements description is 

scheduled to be approved. 

‘‘(4) A test baseline summarizing the comprehensive test 

program for the program element or major subprogram outlined 

in the integrated master test plan. 

‘‘(c) ANNUAL REPORTS ON ACQUISITION BASELINES.—(1) Not 

later than February 15 of each year, the Director shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the acquisition baselines required by subsection (a). 

‘‘(2)(A) The first report under paragraph (1) shall set forth each 

acquisition baseline required by subsection (a) for a program element or major subprogram. 

‘‘(B) Each subsequent report under paragraph (1) shall include— 

‘‘(i) any new acquisition baselines required by subsection (a) 

for a program element or major subprogram; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
43 

‘‘(ii) with respect to an acquisition baseline that was previously included in a report under paragraph (1), an identification of any changes or variances made to the elements described 

in subsection (b) for such acquisition baseline, as compared to— 

‘‘(I) the initial acquisition baseline for such program 

element or major subprogram; and 

‘‘(II) the acquisition baseline for such program element 

or major subprogram that was submitted in the report during the previous year. 

‘‘(3) Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

‘‘(d) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION ON REVISION.—The Director 

may adjust or revise an acquisition baseline established under this 

section if the Director submits to the congressional defense committees notification of— 

‘‘(1) a justification for such adjustment or revision; 

‘‘(2) the specific adjustments or revisions made to the acquisition baseline, including to the elements described in subsection (b); and 

‘‘(3) the effective date of the adjusted or revised acquisition 

baseline.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 

following new item: 

‘‘225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2011 NDAA.—Section 225 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4170; 10 U.S.C. 223 note) is repealed. 

(2) FISCAL YEAR 2008 NDAA.—Section 223 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 

110–181; 122 Stat. 39; 10 U.S.C. 223 note) is amended by striking subsection (g). 

(3) FISCAL YEAR 2003 NDAA.—Section 221 of the Bob Stump 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2484; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is repealed. 

SEC. 232. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF MISSILE DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 

(a) COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall review the annual reports submitted under section 

225(c) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 231 

of this Act, that cover any of fiscal years 2012 through 2015 

and assess the extent to which the Missile Defense Agency has 

achieved its acquisition goals and objectives. 

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than March 15, 2013, and each 

year thereafter through 2016, the Comptroller General shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

assessment under paragraph (1) with respect to the acquisition 

baselines for the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall include 

any findings and recommendations on missile defense acquisiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
44 

tion programs and accountability therefore that the Comptroller 

General considers appropriate. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS ON MISSILE DEFENSE EXECUTIVE BOARD

ACTIVITIES.—In each of the first three reports submitted under section 225(c) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 231 

of this Act, the Director shall include a description of the activities 

of the Missile Defense Executive Board during the fiscal year preceding the date of the report, including the following: 

(1) A list of each meeting of the Board during such year. 

(2) The agenda and issues considered at each such meeting. 

(3) A description of any decisions or recommendations 

made by the Board at each such meeting. 

(c) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED REPORTING AUTHORITY.—Section 

232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 

(Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1037; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is 

amended by striking subsection (g). 

SEC. 233. HOMELAND DEFENSE HEDGING POLICY AND STRATEGY. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—In light of the homeland missile defense hedging policy and strategy framework described in the Ballistic Missile Defense Review of 2010, not later than 75 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the missile defense hedging strategy review for the protection 

of the homeland of the United States. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) shall include 

the following: 

(1) A description of the findings and conclusions of the 

strategy review. 

(2) A description of the hedging alternatives and capabilities considered by the Secretary. 

(3) A summary of the analyses conducted, including the criteria used to assess the alternatives and capabilities described 

in paragraph (2). 

(4) A detailed description of the plans, programs, and the 

budget profile for implementing the strategy through the future 

years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 

of title 10, United States Code, with the budget of the President 

for fiscal year 2013. 

(5) The criteria to be used in determining whether and 

when each item contained in the strategy should be implemented and the schedule and budget profile required to implement each item. 

(6) A discussion of the feasibility and advisability of deploying a missile defense site on the East Coast of the United 

States. 

(7) Any other information the Secretary considers necessary. 

(c) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted 

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 234. GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE PROGRAM. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) it is essential for the ground-based midcourse defense 

element of the ballistic missile defense system to achieve the levels of reliability, availability, sustainability, and operational 

performance that will allow it to continue providing protection 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
45 

of the United States homeland, throughout its operational service life, against limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate); 

(2) the Missile Defense Agency should, as its highest priority, determine the root cause of the December 2010 flight-test 

failure of the ground-based midcourse defense system, design a 

correction of the problem causing the flight-test failure, and 

verify through extensive testing that such correction is effective 

and will allow the ground-based midcourse defense system to 

reach levels described in paragraph (1); 

(3) after the Missile Defense Agency has verified the correction of the problem causing the December 2010 flight-test failure, including through the two previously unplanned 

verification flight tests, the Agency should assess the need for 

any additional ground-based interceptors and any additional 

steps needed for the ground-based midcourse defense testing 

and sustainment program; and 

(4) the Department of Defense should plan for and budget 

sufficient future funds for the ground-based midcourse defense 

program to ensure the ability to complete and verify an effective 

correction of the problem causing the December 2010 flight-test 

failure, to mitigate the effects of corrective actions on previously 

planned program work that is deferred as a result of such corrective actions, and to enhance the program over time. 

(b) REPORTS.— 

(1) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and one year thereafter, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report describing the plan of the Department of 

Defense to correct the problem causing the December 2010 

flight-test failure of the ground-based midcourse defense system, 

and any progress toward the achievement of that plan. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required by paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) A detailed discussion of the plan to correct the 

problem described in that paragraph, including plans for 

diagnostic, design, testing, and manufacturing actions. 

(B) A detailed discussion of any results obtained from 

the plan described in subparagraph (A) as of the date of 

such report, including diagnostic, design, testing, or manufacturing results. 

(C) A description of any cost or schedule impact of the 

plan on the ground-based midcourse defense program, including on testing, production, refurbishment, or deferred 

work. 

(D) A description of any planned adjustments to the 

ground-based midcourse defense program as a result of the 

implementation of the plan, including future programmatic, schedule, testing, or funding adjustments. 

(E) A description of any enhancements to the capability 

of the ground-based midcourse defense system achieved or 

planned since the submittal of the budget for fiscal year 

2010 pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 

Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
46 

(3) FORM.—Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 235. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE MEDIUM 

EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the medium extended air defense system program, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a 

plan to use such funds as final obligations under such program for 

either— 

(1) implementing a restructured program of reduced scope; 

or 

(2) contract termination liability costs with respect to the 

contracts covering the program. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The plan under subsection (a) shall include the 

following: 

(1) The plan of the Secretary for using funds authorized to 

be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the medium extended air defense system program for the purposes described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a). 

(2) An explanation of the amount of the total cost for which 

the United States would be liable with respect to either— 

(A) restructuring the program as described in such 

paragraph (1); or 

(B) terminating the contracts covering the program, either unilaterally or multilaterally, as described in such 

paragraph (2). 

(3) An explanation of the terms of any agreement with Germany or Italy (or both) with respect to program restructuring 

or contract termination. 

(4) A description of the program schedule and specific elements of a restructured program to develop, test, and evaluate 

technologies for possible incorporation into future air and missile defense architectures of the United States. 

(5) A description of the specific technologies identified by 

the Secretary for possible incorporation into future air and missile defense architectures of the United States. 

(6) A description of how the Secretary plans to address the 

future air and missile defense requirements of the Department 

of Defense in the absence of a fielded medium extended air defense system capability, including a summary of activities, the 

cost estimate, and the funding profile necessary to sustain and 

upgrade the Patriot air and missile defense system. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report providing a detailed description of the efforts the Secretary has made with Germany and Italy, including any involvement by the Secretary of 

State, to agree on ways to minimize the costs to each nation of implementing a restructured program or of unilateral or multilateral 

contract termination. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
47 

SEC. 236. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TRAINING. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) progress has been made in improving the integration of 

ballistic missile defense training across and between combatant 

commands and military services and identifying the training 

requirements, capabilities, and resources that the Department of 

Defense needs for this complex mission that is vital to the protection of the United States and its deployed forces and allies 

against ballistic missile attacks; 

(2) it is important to continue effective and integrated missile defense training to improve the capabilities of the ballistic 

missile defense system and its elements; and 

(3) the Department of Defense should continue to identify 

the capabilities and resources needed to effectively and adequately integrate training across and between the combatant 

commands and military services and should continue efforts to 

improve such training. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

SEC. 241. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR BIENNIAL ROADMAP 

AND ANNUAL REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION ON FUNDING 

FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HYPERSONICS. 

Section 218(e)(3) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 

2126; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

SEC. 242. REPORT AND COST ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS FOR OHIOCLASS REPLACEMENT BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINE. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on each of the 

options described in subsection (b) to replace the Ohio-class ballistic 

submarine program. The report shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the procurement cost and total lifecycle costs associated with each option. 

(2) An assessment of the ability for each option to meet— 

(A) the at-sea requirements of the Commander that are 

in place as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) any expected changes in such requirements. 

(3) An assessment of the ability for each option to meet— 

(A) the nuclear employment and planning guidance in 

place as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) any expected changes in such guidance. 

(4) A description of the postulated threat and strategic environment used to inform the selection of a final option and how 

each option provides flexibility for responding to changes in the 

threat and strategic environment. 

(b) OPTIONS CONSIDERED.—The options described in this subsection to replace the Ohio-class ballistic submarine program are as 

follows: 

(1) A fleet of 12 submarines with 16 missile tubes each. 

(2) A fleet of 10 submarines with 20 missile tubes each. 

(3) A fleet of 10 submarines with 16 missile tubes each. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
48 

(4) A fleet of eight submarines with 20 missile tubes each. 

(5) Any other options the Secretary and the Commander 

consider appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 243. REPORT ON THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RAIL GUN SYSTEM. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the development, future deployment, and operational challenges of the electromagnetic 

rail gun system of the Navy. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the various operational problem sets 

the electromagnetic rail gun system might be used against, including— 

(A) naval surface fire support; 

(B) anti-surface warfare, including small-boat threats; 

(C) cruise missile, ballistic missile, and anti-aircraft 

defense; and 

(D) other missions as defined by the Secretary. 

(2) An analysis of the technical challenges in developing the 

electromagnetic rail gun system, including— 

(A) power generation and storage to achieve desired firing rates and ranges; 

(B) projectile development; 

(C) launcher/bore design and lifetime; and 

(D) ship integration challenges. 

(3) An identification of existing supporting research programs being executed outside of the Navy that support the development of the electromagnetic rail gun system, as well as opportunities where collaborative research between the Navy and 

other research components could accelerate development. 

(4) An assessment of possible deployment configurations, 

including— 

(A) for ship-based applications, an identification of 

candidate ships for initial integration; 

(B) for land-based applications, an identification of 

possible mission sets and locations for early prototyping opportunities; and 

(C) other alternative approaches for rapid prototyping. 

(5) With respect to the information provided by the Secretary of the Navy under paragraphs (1) through (4), the opinions of the Secretary of the Army, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 

Engineering, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, and the 

Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 

(c) INTERIM UPDATE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Naval Research shall provide 

an update briefing to the congressional defense committees. 

(d) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
49 

SEC. 244. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE KC–46A 

AIRCRAFT ACQUISITION PROGRAM. 

(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—During the period beginning on the 

date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2017, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual 

review of the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2012 and ending in 2017, the Comptroller General 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the review of the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program conducted under subsection (a). 

(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report on the review 

of the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program shall include the 

following: 

(A) The extent to which the program is meeting engineering, manufacturing, development, and procurement 

cost, schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals. 

(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for 

the KC–46A aircraft, the progress and results of— 

(i) developmental and operational testing of the 

aircraft; and 

(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in aircraft performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety. 

(C) An assessment of KC–46A aircraft procurement 

plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier performance. 

(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the 

KC–46A aircraft, including whether such strategy is in 

compliance with acquisition management best-practices 

and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense. 

(E) A risk assessment of the integrated master schedule 

and the test and evaluation master plan of the KC–46A aircraft as it relates to— 

(i) the probability of success; 

(ii) the funding required for such aircraft compared with the funding budgeted; and 

(iii) development and production concurrency. 

(3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph 

(1) and a report following any changes made by the Secretary 

of the Air Force to the baseline documentation of the KC–46A 

aircraft acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of— 

(A) the integrated baseline review document; 

(B) the initial capabilities document; 

(C) the capabilities development document; and 

(D) the systems requirement document. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
50 

SEC. 245. INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC MODERNIZATION PROGRAM. 

(a) INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 30 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall select an appropriate entity outside the Department of 

Defense to conduct an independent review and assessment of the 

cryptographic modernization program of the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The review and assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) For each military department and appropriate defense 

agency, an analysis of the adequacy of the program management structure for executing the cryptographic modernization 

program, including resources, personnel, requirements generation, and business process metrics. 

(2) A description of the acquisition model for each military 

department and appropriate defense agency, including how the 

acquisition strategies of programs of record are synchronized 

with the needs of the cryptographic modernization program. 

(3) An analysis of the current funding mechanism, the Information System Security Program, to provide adequate and 

stable funding to meet cryptographic modernization needs. 

(4) An analysis of the ability of the program to deliver capabilities to the user community while complying with the 

budget and schedule for the program, including the programmatic risks that negatively affect such compliance. 

(c) REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the entity conducting the review and assessment under subsection (a) shall submit to the 

Secretary and the congressional defense committees a report 

containing— 

(A) the results of the review and assessment; and 

(B) recommendations for improving the management of 

the cryptographic modernization program. 

(2) ADDITIONAL EVALUATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 

days after the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary 

shall submit to such committees an evaluation by the Secretary 

of the findings and recommendations contained in such report. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

SEC. 246. REPORT ON INCREASED BUDGET ITEMS. 

(a) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report describing the 

contract award process for each contract described in subsection 

(b) for which the Secretary will obligate funds authorized for a 

program element described in subsection (c). In the case of 

funds that are not yet obligated for any such contract by the 

end of fiscal year 2012, the Secretary shall describe the process 

planned for the award of such a contract. 

(2) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit the report required by paragraph (1) not later than December 31, 2012. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
51 

(b) CONTRACT DESCRIBED.—For purposes of subsection (a), a 

contract described in this subsection is a contract awarded using 

procedures other than competitive procedures pursuant to the exceptions set forth in section 2304(c) of title 10, United States Code, or 

any other exceptions provided in law or regulation. 

(c) PROGRAM ELEMENT DESCRIBED.—(1) For purposes of subsection (a), a program element described in this subsection is a program element funded— 

(A) with amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 

201; and 

(B) in a total amount that is more than the amount requested for such program element by the President in the budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United 

States Code, for fiscal year 2012. 

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the total amount referred 

to in such paragraph does not include funds transferred into such 

program element that were included elsewhere in the budget referred to in such paragraph. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 251. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION 

INITIATIVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 2359a of title 10, United States Code, 

is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by striking the 

item relating to section 2359a. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on October 1, 2013. 

SEC. 252. CONTRACTOR COST-SHARING IN PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE 

SYSTEMS. 

Section 243 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4178; 10 

U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) COST-SHARING.—Any contract for the design or development 

of a system resulting from activities under subsection (a) for the 

purpose of enhancing or enabling the exportability of the system either— 

‘‘(1) for the development of program protection strategies for 

the system; or 

‘‘(2) for the design and incorporation of exportability features into the system, 

shall include a cost-sharing provision that requires the contractor to 

bear at least one-half of the cost of such activities.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
52 

SEC. 253. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE 

FUNDS FOR DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH 

AND DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY 

MISSIONS. 

Section 219(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended 

by striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2016’’. 

SEC. 254. NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM. 

If the total amount authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

for the National Defense Education Program for fiscal year 2012 is 

less than the amount requested by the President for such program 

in the budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, 

United States Code, for such fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense 

may not derive the difference between such amounts from the K–12 

component of such program. 

SEC. 255. LABORATORY FACILITIES, HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE. 

(a) ACQUISITION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of 

the Army (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may acquire any real property and associated real property interests in 

the vicinity of Hanover, New Hampshire, described in paragraph (2) as may be needed for the Engineer Research and Development Center laboratory facilities at the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. 

(2) DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY.—The real property described in this paragraph is the real property to be acquired 

under paragraph (1)— 

(A) consisting of approximately 18.5 acres, identified as 

Tracts 101–1 and 101–2, together with all necessary easements located entirely within the Town of Hanover, New 

Hampshire; and 

(B) generally bounded— 

(i) to the east by state route 10-Lyme Road; 

(ii) to the north by the vacant property of the 

Trustees of Dartmouth College; 

(iii) to the south by Fletcher Circle graduate student housing owned by the Trustees of Dartmouth College; and 

(iv) to the west by approximately 9 acres of real 

property acquired in fee through condemnation in 1981 

by the Secretary. 

(3) AMOUNT PAID FOR PROPERTY.—The Secretary shall pay 

not more than fair market value for any real property and associated real property interest acquired under this subsection. 

(b) REVOLVING FUND.—The Secretary— 

(1) through the Plant Replacement and Improvement Program of the Secretary, may use amounts in the revolving fund 

established by section 101 of the Civil Functions Appropriations 

Act, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 576) to acquire the real property and associated real property interests described in subsection (a); and 

(2) shall ensure that the revolving fund is appropriately reimbursed from the benefitting appropriations. 

(c) RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
53 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may provide the seller of 

any real property and associated property interests identified in 

subsection (a) a right of first refusal— 

(A) a right of first refusal to acquire the property, or 

any portion of the property, in the event the property or portion is no longer needed by the Department of the Army; 

and 

(B) a right of first refusal to acquire any real property 

or associated real property interests acquired by condemnation in Civil Action No. 81–360–L, in the event the property, 

or any portion of the property, is no longer needed by the 

Department of the Army. 

(2) NATURE OF RIGHT.—A right of first refusal provided to 

a seller under this subsection shall not inure to the benefit of 

any successor or assign of the seller. 

(d) CONSIDERATION; FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The purchase of 

any property by a seller exercising a right of first refusal provided 

under subsection (c) shall be for— 

(1) consideration acceptable to the Secretary; and 

(2) not less than fair market value at the time at which the 

property becomes available for purchase. 

(e) DISPOSAL.—The Secretary may dispose of any property or associated real property interests that are subject to the exercise of the 

right of first refusal under this section. 

(f) NO EFFECT ON COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.— 

Nothing in this section affects or limits the application of or obligation to comply with any environmental law, including section 120(h) 

of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)). 

SEC. 256. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ACTIVE MATRIX ORGANIC LIGHT 

EMITTING DIODE TECHNOLOGY. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) active matrix organic light emitting diode (in this section referred to as ‘‘OLED’’) technology displays have the potential to reduce the size, weight, and energy consumption of both 

dismounted and mounted systems of the Armed Forces; 

(2) the United States has a limited OLED manufacturing 

industry; 

(3) to ensure a reliable domestic source of OLED displays, 

the Secretary of Defense can use existing programs, including 

the ManTech program, to support the reduction of the costs and 

risks related to OLED manufacturing technologies; and 

(4) the reduction of such costs and risks of OLED manufacturing has the potential to enable the affordable production and 

sustainment of future weapon systems, as well as the affordable 

transition of new technologies that can enhance capabilities of 

current force systems. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 

Sec. 311. Designation of senior official of Joint Chiefs of Staff for operational energy plans and programs and operational energy budget certification. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
54 

Sec. 312. Improved Sikes Act coverage of State-owned facilities used for the national 

defense. 

Sec. 313. Discharge of wastes at sea generated by ships of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 314. Modification to the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs. 

Sec. 315. Energy-efficient technologies in contracts for logistics support of contingency operations. 

Sec. 316. Health assessment reports required when waste is disposed of in open-air 

burn pits. 

Sec. 317. Streamlined annual report on defense environmental programs. 

Sec. 318. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in 

connection with Jackson Park Housing Complex, Washington. 

Sec. 319. Requirements relating to Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry investigation of exposure to drinking water contamination at Camp 

Lejeune, North Carolina. 

Sec. 320. Fire suppression agents. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Definition of depot-level maintenance and repair. 

Sec. 322. Designation of military arsenal facilities as Centers of Industrial and 

Technical Excellence. 

Sec. 323. Permanent and expanded authority for Army industrial facilities to enter 

into certain cooperative arrangements with non-Army entities. 

Sec. 324. Implementation of corrective actions resulting from corrosion study of the 

F–22 and F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 325. Modification of requirements relating to minimum capital investment for 

certain depots. 

Sec. 326. Reports on depot-related activities. 

Sec. 327. Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities. 

Subtitle D—Readiness 

Sec. 331. Modification of Department of Defense authority to accept voluntary contributions of funds. 

Sec. 332. Review of proposed structures affecting navigable airspace. 

Subtitle E—Reports 

Sec. 341. Annual certification and modifications of annual report on prepositioned 

materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 342. Additional matters for inclusion in and modified deadline for the annual 

report on operational energy. 

Sec. 343. Study on Air Force test and training range infrastructure. 

Sec. 344. Study on training range infrastructure for special operations forces. 

Sec. 345. Guidance to establish non-tactical wheeled vehicle and equipment service 

life extension programs to achieve cost savings. 

Sec. 346. Study on United States force posture in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

Sec. 347. Study on overseas basing presence of United States forces. 

Sec. 348. Inclusion of assessment of joint military training and force allocations in 

quadrennial defense review and national military strategy. 

Sec. 349. Modification of report on procurement of military working dogs. 

Subtitle F—Limitations and Extension of Authority 

Sec. 351. Adoption of military working dog by family of deceased or seriously 

wounded member of the Armed Forces who was the dog’s handler. 

Sec. 352. Prohibition on expansion of the Air Force food transformation initiative. 

Sec. 353. Designation and limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds for the 

migration of Army enterprise email services. 

Sec. 354. One-year extension of pilot program for availability of working-capital 

funds to Army for certain product improvements. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Sec. 361. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition 

components in excess of military requirements, and fired cartridge cases. 

Sec. 362. Comptroller General review of space-available travel on military aircraft. 

Sec. 363. Authority to provide information for maritime safety of forces and hydrographic support. 

Sec. 364. Deposit of reimbursed funds under reciprocal fire protection agreements. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
55 

Sec. 365. Clarification of the airlift service definitions relative to the Civil Reserve 

Air Fleet. 

Sec. 366. Ratemaking procedures for Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts. 

Sec. 367. Policy on Active Shooter Training for certain law enforcement personnel. 

Sec. 368. Procurement of tents or other temporary structures. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 

SEC. 311. DESIGNATION OF SENIOR OFFICIAL OF JOINT CHIEFS OF 

STAFF FOR OPERATIONAL ENERGY PLANS AND PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONAL ENERGY BUDGET CERTIFICATION. 

Section 138c of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (d)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 

paragraph (3): 

‘‘(3) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall designate 

a senior official under the jurisdiction of the Chairman who shall 

be responsible for operational energy plans and programs for the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff. The official so designated 

shall be responsible for coordinating with the Assistant Secretary 

and implementing initiatives pursuant to the strategy with regard 

to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (e)(4), by striking ‘‘10 days’’ and inserting 

‘‘30 days’’. 

SEC. 312. IMPROVED SIKES ACT COVERAGE OF STATE-OWNED FACILITIES USED FOR THE NATIONAL DEFENSE. 

(a) IMPROVEMENTS TO ACT.—The Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670 et 

seq.) is amended as follows: 

(1) DEFINITIONS.—Section 100 (16 U.S.C. 670) is amended— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 

paragraphs: 

‘‘(2) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means any of the several 

States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 

Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands. 

‘‘(3) STATE-OWNED NATIONAL GUARD INSTALLATION.—The 

term ‘State-owned National Guard installation’ means land 

owned and operated by a State when such land is used for 

training the National Guard pursuant to chapter 5 of title 32, 

United States Code, with funds provided by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department, even though 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
56 

such land is not under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense.’’. 

(2) FUNDING OF INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGE- MENT PLANS.—Section 101 (16 U.S.C. 670a) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)(1)(B)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ before ‘‘To facilitate’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(ii) The Secretary of a military department may, 

subject to the availability of appropriations, develop 

and implement an integrated natural resources management plan for a State-owned National Guard installation. Such a plan shall be developed and implemented in coordination with the chief executive officer 

of the State in which the State-owned National Guard 

installation is located. Such a plan is deemed, for purposes of any other provision of law, to be for lands or 

other geographical areas owned or controlled by the 

Department of Defense, or designated for its use.’’; 

(B) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ‘‘or State-owned 

National Guard installation’’ after ‘‘military installation’’ 

both places it appears; 

(C) in subsection (a)(3)— 

(i) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and 

(C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘Consistent’’; 

(iii) in subparagraph (A), as designated by clause 

(ii) of this subparagraph, by inserting ‘‘and Stateowned National Guard installations’’ after ‘‘military 

installations’’ the first place it appears; 

(iv) in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), as redesignated by clause (i) of this subparagraph, by striking 

‘‘military installations’’ and inserting ‘‘such installations’’; 

(v) in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A), as redesignated by clause (i) of this subparagraph, by inserting 

‘‘on such installations’’ after ‘‘resources’’; and 

(vi) by adding at the end the following subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) In the case of a State-owned National Guard installation, such program shall be carried out in coordination with the chief executive officer of the State in which the 

installation is located.’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘and State-owned 

National Guard installations’’ after ‘‘military installations’’ 

the first place it appears; 

(E) in subparagraphs (G) and (I) of subsection (b)(1), 

by striking ‘‘military installation’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘installation’’; and 

(F) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting ‘‘, in the case of a 

military installation,’’ after ‘‘(3) may’’. 

(3) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Section 103a(a) (16 U.S.C. 

670c–1(a)) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Department of Defense installations’’ and inserting ‘‘military installations 

and State-owned National Guard installations’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
57 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Department of Defense installation’’ and inserting ‘‘military installation or 

State-owned National Guard installation’’. 

(b) SECTION AND SUBSECTION HEADINGS.—Such Act is further 

amended as follows: 

(1) Section 101 (16 U.S.C. 670a) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 101. COOPERATIVE PLAN FOR CONSERVATION AND REHABILITATION.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 101.’’; 

(C) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘PROHIBITIONS ON

SALE AND LEASE OF LANDS UNLESS EFFECTS COMPATIBLE

WITH PLAN.—’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; 

(D) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘IMPLEMENTATION

AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES

MANAGEMENT PLANS.—’’ after ‘‘(d)’’; 

(E) in subsection (e)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘APPLICABILITY OF OTHER

LAWS.—’’ after ‘‘(e)’’; and 

(ii) by inserting a comma after ‘‘Code’’. 

(2) Section 102 (16 U.S.C. 670b) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 102. MIGRATORY GAME BIRDS; HUNTING PERMITS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 102.’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN.—’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘agency:’’ and all that follows through 

‘‘possession’’ and inserting ‘‘agency. 

‘‘(b) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAWS.—Possession’’. 

(3) Section 103a (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is further amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 103A. COOPERATIVE AND INTERAGENCY AGREEMENTS FOR 

LAND MANAGEMENT ON INSTALLATIONS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 103A.’’; 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF MILITARY DEPARTMENT.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

(D) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘AVAILABILITY OF

FUNDS; AGREEMENTS UNDER OTHER LAWS.—’’ after ‘‘(c)’’. 

(4) Section 104 (16 U.S.C. 670d) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 104. LIABILITY FOR FUNDS; ACCOUNTING TO COMPTROLLER 

GENERAL.’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 104.’’. 

(5) Section 105 (16 U.S.C. 670e) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 105. APPLICABILITY TO OTHER LAWS; NATIONAL FOREST 

LANDS.’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 105.’’. 

(6) Section 108 (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 108. APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 108.’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
58 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘EXPENDITURES OF

COLLECTED FUNDS UNDER INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANS.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF

APPROPRIATIONS TO SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; 

(E) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF

APPROPRIATIONS TO SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—’’ after 

‘‘(c)’’; and 

(F) in subsection (D), by inserting ‘‘USE OF OTHER

CONSERVATION OR REHABILITATION AUTHORITIES.—’’ after 

‘‘(d)’’. 

(7) Section 201 (16 U.S.C. 670g) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 201. WILDLIFE, FISH, AND GAME CONSERVATION AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 201.’’; 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘PROGRAMS REQUIRED.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘IMPLEMENTATION OF

PROGRAMS.—’’ after ‘‘(b)’’. 

(8) Section 202 (16 U.S.C. 670h) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 202. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR CONSERVATION AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 202.’’; 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘DEVELOPMENT OF

PLANS.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘CONSISTENCY WITH

OVERALL LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT PLANS; HUNTING, 

TRAPPING, AND FISHING.—’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; 

(E) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENTS BY STATE AGENCIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF

PROGRAMS.—’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; and 

(F) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘STATE AGENCY

AGREEMENTS NOT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS UNDER

OTHER PROVISIONS.—’’ after ‘‘(d)’’. 

(9) Section 203 (16 U.S.C. 670i) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 203. PUBLIC LAND MANAGEMENT AREA STAMPS FOR HUNTING, 

TRAPPING, AND FISHING ON PUBLIC LANDS SUBJECT TO 

PROGRAMS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 203.’’; 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘AGREEMENTS TO RE- QUIRE STAMPS.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

(D) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘CONDITIONS FOR AGREEMENTS.—’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and 

(ii) by moving paragraph (3) 2 ems to the right, so 

that the left-hand margin aligns with that of paragraph (2). 

(10) Section 204 (16 U.S.C. 670j) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 204. ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 204.’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
59 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘VIOLATIONS AND

PENALTIES.—’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘ENFORCEMENT POWERS AND PROCEEDINGS.—’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and 

(E) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.—’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; and 

(F) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘APPLICABILITY OF

CUSTOMS LAWS.—’’ after ‘‘(d)’’. 

(11) Section 205 (16 U.S.C. 670k) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 205. DEFINITIONS.’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 205.’’. 

(12) Section 206 (16 U.S.C. 670l) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 206. STAMP REQUIREMENTS NOT APPLICABLE TO FOREST SERVICE AND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LANDS; AUTHORIZED FEES.’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 206.’’. 

(13) Section 207 (16 U.S.C. 670m) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 207. INDIAN RIGHTS; STATE OR FEDERAL JURISDICTION REGULATING INDIAN RIGHTS.’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 207.’’. 

(14) Section 209 (16 U.S.C. 670o) is amended— 

(A) by inserting at the beginning the following: 

‘‘SEC. 209. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘SEC. 209.’’; 

(C) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—’’ after 

‘‘(a)’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.—’’ after 

‘‘(b)’’; 

(E) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘USE OF OTHER CONSERVATION OR REHABILITATION AUTHORITIES.—’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; 

and 

(F) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—’’ after ‘‘(d)’’. 

(c) CODIFICATION OF CHANGE OF NAME.—Section 204(b) of such 

Act (16 U.S.C. 670j) is amended by striking ‘‘magistrate’’ both 

places it appears and inserting ‘‘magistrate judge’’. 

(d) REPEAL OF OBSOLETE SECTION.—Section 208 of such Act is 

repealed, and section 209 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 670o) is redesignated as section 208. 

SEC. 313. DISCHARGE OF WASTES AT SEA GENERATED BY SHIPS OF 

THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) DISCHARGE RESTRICTIONS FOR SHIPS OF THE ARMED

FORCES.—Subsection (b) of section 3 of the Act to Prevent Pollution 

from Ships (33 U.S.C. 1902(b)) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (3), this Act shall not 

apply to— 

‘‘(A) a ship of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2); 

or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
60 

‘‘(B) any other ship specifically excluded by the MARPOL 

Protocol or the Antarctic Protocol. 

‘‘(2) A ship described in this paragraph is a ship that is owned 

or operated by the Secretary, with respect to the Coast Guard, or by 

the Secretary of a military department, and that, as determined by 

the Secretary concerned— 

‘‘(A) has unique military design, construction, manning, or 

operating requirements; and 

‘‘(B) cannot fully comply with the discharge requirements of 

Annex V to the Convention because compliance is not technologically feasible or would impair the operations or operational 

capability of the ship. 

‘‘(3)(A) Notwithstanding any provision of the MARPOL Protocol, the requirements of Annex V to the Convention shall apply to 

all ships referred to in subsection (a) other than those described in 

paragraph (2). 

‘‘(B) A ship that is described in paragraph (2) shall limit the 

discharge into the sea of garbage as follows: 

‘‘(i) The discharge into the sea of plastics, including synthetic ropes, synthetic fishing nets, plastic garbage bags, and incinerator ashes from plastic products that may contain toxic 

chemicals or heavy metals, or the residues thereof, is prohibited. 

‘‘(ii) Garbage consisting of the following material may be 

discharged into the sea, subject to subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(I) A non-floating slurry of seawater, paper, cardboard, or food waste that is capable of passing through a 

screen with openings no larger than 12 millimeters in diameter. 

‘‘(II) Metal and glass that have been shredded and 

bagged (in compliance with clause (i)) so as to ensure negative buoyancy. 

‘‘(III) With regard to a submersible, nonplastic garbage 

that has been compacted and weighted to ensure negative 

buoyancy. 

‘‘(IV) Ash from incinerators or other thermal destruction systems not containing toxic chemicals, heavy metals, 

or incompletely burned plastics. 

‘‘(C)(i) Garbage described in subparagraph (B)(ii)(I) may not be 

discharged within 3 nautical miles of land. 

‘‘(ii) Garbage described in subclauses (II), (III), and (IV) of subparagraph (B)(ii) may not be discharged within 12 nautical miles 

of land. 

‘‘(D) Notwithstanding subparagraph (C), a ship described in 

paragraph (2) that is not equipped with garbage-processing equipment sufficient to meet the requirements of subparagraph (B)(ii) 

may discharge garbage that has not been processed in accordance 

with subparagraph (B)(ii) if such discharge occurs as far as practicable from the nearest land, but in any case not less than— 

‘‘(i) 12 nautical miles from the nearest land, in the case of 

food wastes and non-floating garbage, including paper products, cloth, glass, metal, bottles, crockery, and similar refuse; 

and 

‘‘(ii) 25 nautical miles from the nearest land, in the case of 

all other garbage. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
61 

‘‘(E) This paragraph shall not apply when discharge of any garbage is necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of the ship, 

the health of the ship’s personnel, or saving life at sea. In the event 

that there is such a discharge, the discharge shall be reported to the 

Secretary, with respect to the Coast Guard, or the Secretary concerned. 

‘‘(F) This paragraph shall not apply during time of war or a 

national emergency declared by the President or Congress.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 3(f) of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (33 U.S.C. 1902(f)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Annex V to the Convention on or before the dates referred to in subsections (b)(2)(A) 

and (c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘and subsection 

(b)(3)(B)(i) of this section’’ after ‘‘Annex V to the Convention’’. 

SEC. 314. MODIFICATION TO THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR OPERATIONAL ENERGY, PLANS, AND PROGRAMS. 

(a) MODIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES.—Section 138(c) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the heads of 

the military departments and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Research and Engineering, shall— 

‘‘(A) lead the alternative fuel activities of the Department of 

Defense and oversee the investments of the Department in such 

activities; 

‘‘(B) make recommendations to the Secretary regarding the 

development of alternative fuels by the military departments 

and the Office of the Secretary of Defense; 

‘‘(C) establish guidelines and prescribe policy to streamline 

the investments in alternative fuel activities across the Department of Defense; 

‘‘(D) encourage collaboration with and leveraging of investments made by the Department of Energy, the Department of 

Agriculture, and other relevant Federal agencies to advance alternative fuel development to the benefit of the Department of 

Defense; and 

‘‘(E) certify the budget associated with the investment of the 

Department of Defense in alternative fuel activities in accordance with subsection (e)(4).’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 2925(b)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph 

(F); and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new 

subparagraph (E): 

‘‘(E) A description of the alternative fuel initiatives of the 

Department of Defense, including funding and expenditures by 

account and activity for the preceding fiscal year, including 

funding made available in regular defense appropriations Acts 

and any supplemental appropriation Acts.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
62 

SEC. 315. ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN CONTRACTS FOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT OF CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

(a) ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN.—The energy performance master plan for the Department of Defense developed under 

section 2911 of title 10, United States Code, shall specifically address the application of energy-efficient or energy reduction technologies or processes meeting the requirements of subsection (b) in 

logistics support contracts for contingency operations. In accordance 

with the requirements of such section, the plan shall include goals, 

metrics, and incentives for achieving energy efficiency in such contracts. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND PROCESSES.—Energy-efficient and energy reduction technologies or processes described in subsection (a) are technologies or processes that 

meet the following criteria: 

(1) The technology or process achieves long-term savings for 

the Government by reducing overall demand for fuel and other 

sources of energy in contingency operations. 

(2) The technology or process does not disrupt the mission, 

the logistics, or the core requirements in the contingency operation concerned. 

(3) The technology or process is able to integrate seamlessly 

into the existing infrastructure in the contingency operation concerned. 

(d) REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue such regulations and guidance as may be needed to implement the requirements of this section and ensure that goals established pursuant to 

subsection (a) are met. Such regulations or guidance shall consider 

the lifecycle cost savings associated with the energy technology or 

process being offered by a vendor for defense logistics support and 

oblige the offeror to demonstrate the savings achieved over traditional technologies. 

(e) REPORT.—The annual report required by section 2925(b) of 

title 10, United States Code, shall include information on the 

progress in the implementation of this section, including savings 

achieved by the Department resulting from such implementation. 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘defense logistics support contract’’ means a 

contract for services, or a task order under such a contract, 

awarded by the Department of Defense to provide logistics support during times of military mobilizations, including contingency operations, in any amount greater than the simplified acquisition threshold. 

(2) The term ‘‘contingency operation’’ has the meaning provided in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 316. HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORTS REQUIRED WHEN WASTE IS 

DISPOSED OF IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS. 

Section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2250; 10 U.S.C. 2701 

note) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
63 

‘‘(c) HEALTH ASSESSMENT REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days 

after notice is due under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 

of Representatives a health assessment report on each open-air burn 

pit at a location where at least 100 personnel have been employed 

for 90 consecutive days or more. Each such report shall include each 

of the following: 

‘‘(1) An epidemiological description of the short-term and 

long-term health risks posed to personnel in the area where the 

burn pit is located because of exposure to the open-air burn pit. 

‘‘(2) A copy of the methodology used to determine the health 

risks described in paragraph (1). 

‘‘(3) A copy of the assessment of the operational risks and 

health risks when making the determination pursuant to subsection (a) that no alternative disposal method is feasible for the 

open-air burn pit.’’. 

SEC. 317. STREAMLINED ANNUAL REPORT ON DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2711. Annual report on defense environmental programs 

‘‘(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to Congress each year, not later than 45 days after the date on 

which the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal 

year, a report on defense environmental programs. Each report shall 

include: 

‘‘(1) With respect to environmental restoration activities of 

the Department of Defense, and for each of the military departments, the following elements: 

‘‘(A) Information on the Environmental Restoration 

Program, including the following: 

‘‘(i) The total number of sites in the Environmental 

Restoration Program. 

‘‘(ii) The number of sites in the Environmental Restoration Program that have reached the Remedy in 

Place Stage and the Response Complete Stage, and the 

change in such numbers in the preceding fiscal year. 

‘‘(iii) A statement of the amount of funds allocated 

by the Secretary for, and the anticipated progress in 

implementing, the Environmental Restoration Program 

during the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted. 

‘‘(iv) The Secretary’s assessment of the overall 

progress of the Environmental Restoration Program. 

‘‘(B) Information on the Military Munitions Restoration 

Program (MMRP), including the following: 

‘‘(i) The total number of sites in the MMRP. 

‘‘(ii) The number of sites that have reached the 

Remedy in Place Stage and the Response Complete 

Stage, and the change in such numbers in the preceding fiscal year. 

‘‘(iii) A statement of the amount of funds allocated 

by the Secretary for, and the anticipated progress in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
64 

implementing, the MMRP during the fiscal year for 

which the budget is submitted. 

‘‘(iv) The Secretary’s assessment of the overall 

progress of the MMRP. 

‘‘(2) With respect to each of the major activities under the 

environmental quality program of the Department of Defense 

and for each of the military departments— 

‘‘(A) a statement of the amount expended, or proposed 

to be expended, during the period consisting of the four fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is 

submitted, the current fiscal year, the fiscal year for which 

the budget is submitted, and the fiscal year following the 

fiscal year for which the budget is submitted; and 

‘‘(B) an explanation for any significant change in such 

amounts during the period covered. 

‘‘(3) With respect to the environmental technology program 

of the Department of Defense— 

‘‘(A) a report on the progress made in achieving the objectives and goals of its environmental technology program 

during the preceding fiscal year and an overall trend analysis for the program covering the previous four fiscal years; 

and 

‘‘(B) a statement of the amount expended, or proposed 

to be expended, during the period consisting of the four fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is 

submitted, the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted, and the fiscal year following the fiscal year for 

which the budget is submitted. 

‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

‘‘(1) the term ‘environmental quality program’ means a program of activities relating to environmental compliance, conservation, pollution prevention, and other activities relating to 

environmental quality as the Secretary may designate; and 

‘‘(2) the term ‘major activities’ with respect to an environmental program means— 

‘‘(A) environmental compliance activities; 

‘‘(B) conservation activities; and 

‘‘(C) pollution prevention activities.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 2710 the following new item: 

‘‘2711. Annual report on defense environmental programs.’’. 

SEC. 318. PAYMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OF 

STIPULATED PENALTIES IN CONNECTION WITH JACKSON 

PARK HOUSING COMPLEX, WASHINGTON. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS.— 

(1) TRANSFER AMOUNT.—Using funds described in subsection (b) and notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United 

States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may transfer not more 

than $45,000 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund Jackson 

Park Housing Complex, Washington, special account. 

(2) PURPOSE OF TRANSFER.—The payment under paragraph 

(1) is to pay a stipulated penalty assessed by the Environmental 

Protection Agency on October 7, 2009, against the Jackson Park 

Housing Complex, Washington, for the failure by the Navy to 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
65 

submit a draft Final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study 

for the Jackson Park Housing Complex Operable Unit (OU–3T– 

JPHC) in accordance with the requirements of the Interagency 

Agreement (Administrative Docket No. CERCLA–10–2005– 

0023). 

(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Any payment under subsection (a) 

shall be made using funds authorized to be appropriated by section 

301 for operation and maintenance for Environmental Restoration, 

Navy. 

(c) USE OF FUNDS.—The amount transferred under subsection 

(a) shall be used by the Environmental Protection Agency to pay the 

penalty described under paragraph (2) of such subsection. 

SEC. 319. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY INVESTIGATION OF EXPOSURE TO DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION AT CAMP 

LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA. 

(a) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to make a final decision on or final adjudication of any claim filed regarding water 

contamination at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune unless the 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry completes all epidemiological and water modeling studies relevant to such contamination that are ongoing as of June 1, 2011, and certifies the completion of all such studies in writing to the Committees on Armed Services for the Senate and the House of Representatives. This provision 

does not prevent the use of funds for routine administrative tasks 

required to maintain such claims nor does it prohibit the use of 

funds for matters pending in Federal court. 

(b) RESOLUTION OF CERTAIN DISPUTES.—The Secretary of the 

Navy shall make every effort to resolve any dispute arising between 

the Department of the Navy and the Agency for Toxic Substances 

and Disease Registry that is covered by the Interagency Agreement 

between the Department of Health and Human Services Agency for 

Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the Department of the 

Navy or any successor memorandum of understanding and signed 

agreements not later than 60 days after the date on which the dispute first arises. In the event the Secretary is unable to resolve such 

a dispute within 60 days, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the reasons why an agreement 

has not yet been reached, the actions that the Secretary plans to 

take to reach agreement, and the schedule for taking such actions. 

(c) COORDINATION PRIOR TO RELEASING INFORMATION TO THE

PUBLIC.—The Secretary of the Navy shall make every effort to coordinate with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 

on all issues pertaining to water contamination at Marine Corps 

Base Camp Lejeune, and other exposed pathways before releasing 

anything to the public. 

SEC. 320. FIRE SUPPRESSION AGENTS. 

Section 605(a) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671d(a)) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
66 

‘‘(4) is listed as acceptable for use as a fire suppression 

agent for nonresidential applications in accordance with section 

612(c).’’. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

SEC. 321. DEFINITION OF DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. 

Section 2460 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘§ 2460. Definition of depot-level maintenance and repair 

‘‘In this chapter, the term ‘‘depot-level maintenance and repair’’— 

‘‘(1) means any action performed on materiel or software in 

the conduct of inspection, repair, overhaul, or the modification 

or rebuild of end-items, assemblies, subassemblies, and parts, 

that— 

‘‘(A) requires extensive industrial facilities, specialized 

tools and equipment, or uniquely experienced and trained 

personnel that are not available in lower echelon-level 

maintenance activities; and 

‘‘(B) is a function and, as such, is independent of any 

location or funding source and may be performed in the 

public or private sectors (including the performance of interim contract support or contract logistic support arrangements); and 

‘‘(2) includes— 

‘‘(A) the fabrication of parts, testing, and reclamation, 

as necessary; 

‘‘(B) the repair, adaptive modifications or upgrades, 

change events made to operational software, integration 

and testing; and 

‘‘(C) in the case of either hardware or software modifications or upgrades, the labor associated with the application of the modification.’’. 

SEC. 322. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY ARSENAL FACILITIES AS CENTERS OF INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE. 

Section 2474(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting ‘‘or military arsenal facility’’ after ‘‘depot-level activity’’. 

SEC. 323. PERMANENT AND EXPANDED AUTHORITY FOR ARMY INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TO ENTER INTO CERTAIN COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-ARMY ENTITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4544 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking the second sentence; and 

(2) by striking subsection (k). 

(b) REPORT.—Section 328(b)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 66; 

10 U.S.C. 4544 note) is amended by striking ‘‘the advisability’’ and 

all that follows through the end and inserting ‘‘the effect of the use 

of such authority on the rates charged by each Army industrial facility when bidding on contracts for the Army or for a Defense agency and providing recommendations to improve the ability of each 

category of Army industrial facility (as defined in section 4544(j) of 

title 10, United States Code) to compete for such contracts;’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
67 

SEC. 324. IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RESULTING 

FROM CORROSION STUDY OF THE F–22 AND F–35 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION; CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Not later 

than January 31, 2012, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall implement the recommended 

actions described in subsection (b) and provide to the congressional 

defense committees a briefing on the actions taken by the Under Secretary to implement such recommended actions. 

(b) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS.—The recommended actions described in this subsection are the following four recommended actions included in the report of the Government Accountability Office 

report numbered GAO–11–117R and titled ‘‘Defense Management: 

DOD Needs to Monitor and Assess Corrective Actions Resulting 

from Its Corrosion Study of the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter’’: 

(1) The documentation of program-specific recommendations made as a result of the corrosion study described in subsection (d) with regard to the F–35 and F–22 aircraft and the 

establishment of a process for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken with respect to such 

aircraft in response to such recommendations. 

(2) The documentation of program-specific recommendations made as a result of such corrosion study with regard to 

the other weapon systems identified in the study, specifically the 

CH–53K helicopter, the Joint High Speed Vessel, the Broad 

Area Maritime Surveillance Unmanned Aircraft System, and 

the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, and the establishment of a 

process for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the corrosion prevention and control programs implemented for such 

weapons systems in response to such recommendations. 

(3) The documentation of Air Force-specific and Navy-specific recommendations made as a result of such corrosion study 

and the establishment of a process for monitoring and assessing 

the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the Air Force 

and the Navy in response to such recommendations. 

(4) The documentation of Department of Defense-wide recommendations made as a result of such corrosion study, the implementation of any needed changes in policies and practices to 

improve corrosion prevention and control in new systems acquired by the Department, and the establishment of a process 

for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the corrective 

actions taken by the Department in response to such recommendations. 

(c) DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE.—Not later than December 31, 

2012, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics, in conjunction with the directors of the F–35 and F– 

22 program offices, the directors of the program offices for the weapons systems referred to in subsection (b)(2), the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Secretary of the Navy, 

shall— 

(1) take whatever steps necessary to comply with the recommendations documented pursuant to the required implementation under subsection (a) of the recommended actions described in subsection (b); or 

(2) submit to the congressional defense committees written 

justification of why compliance was not feasible or achieved. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
68 

(d) CORROSION STUDY.—The corrosion study described in this 

subsection is the study required in House Report 111–166 accompanying H.R. 2647 of the 111th Congress conducted by the Office 

of the Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight of the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense and titled ‘‘Corrosion Evaluation of the F–22 

Raptor and F–35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter’’. 

SEC. 325. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO MINIMUM 

CAPITAL INVESTMENT FOR CERTAIN DEPOTS. 

Section 2476 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘maintenance, repair, and 

overhaul’’ after ‘‘combined’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘includes investment funds spent on 

depot infrastructure, equipment, and process improvement 

in direct support’’ and inserting ‘‘includes investment funds 

spent to modernize or improve the efficiency of depot facilities, equipment, work environment, or processes in direct 

support’’; and 

(B) by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, but does not include funds spent for sustainment 

of existing facilities, infrastructure, or equipment’’. 

(3) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following 

new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) A table showing the funded workload performed by 

each covered depot for the preceding three fiscal years and actual investment funds allocated to each depot for the period covered by the report.’’; and 

(4) in subsection (e)(1), by adding at the end the following 

new subparagraph: 

‘‘(I) Tooele Army Depot, Utah.’’. 

SEC. 326. REPORTS ON DEPOT-RELATED ACTIVITIES. 

(a) REPORT ON DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND RECAPITALIZATION OF CERTAIN PARTS AND EQUIPMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense in consultation with the military departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the Drawdown, Retrograde, and Reset Program for the equipment used 

in support of Operations New Dawn and Enduring Freedom 

and the status of the overall supply chain management for 

depot-level activities. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following elements: 

(A) An assessment of the number of backlogged parts 

for critical warfighter needs, an explanation of why those 

parts became backlogged, and an estimate of when the 

backlog is likely to be fully addressed. 

(B) A review of critical warfighter requirements that 

are being impacted by a lack of supplies and parts and an 

explanation of steps that the Secretary plans to take to meet 

the demand requirements of the military departments. 

(C) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of 

working with outside commercial partners and Department 

of Defense arsenals to utilize flexible and efficient turn-key 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
69 

rapid production systems to meet rapidly emerging 

warfighter requirements. 

(D) A review of plans to further consolidate the ordering and stocking of parts and supplies from the military 

departments at depots under the control of the Defense Logistics Agency. 

(3) FLEXIBLE AND EFFICIENT TURN-KEY RAPID PRODUCTION

SYSTEMS DEFINED.—For the purposes of this subsection, flexible 

and efficient turn-key rapid production systems are systems 

that have demonstrated the capability to reduce the costs of 

parts, improve manufacturing efficiency, and have the following 

unique features: 

(A) VIRTUAL AND FLEXIBLE.—Systems that provide for 

flexibility to rapidly respond to requests for low-volume or 

high-volume machined parts and surge demand by accessing the full capacity of small- and medium-sized manufacturing communities in the United States. 

(B) SPEED TO MARKET.—Systems that provide for flexibility that allows rapid introduction of subassemblies for 

new parts and weapons systems to the warfighter. 

(C) RISK MANAGEMENT.—Systems that provide for the 

electronic archiving and updating of turn-key rapid production packages to provide insurance to the Department of 

Defense that parts will be available if there is a supply 

chain disruption. 

(b) REPORT ON THE ALIGNMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL REPORTING, 

MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE, AND PERFORMANCE RATING OF

AIR FORCE SYSTEM PROGRAM MANAGERS, SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM

MANAGERS, AND PRODUCT SUPPORT MANAGERS AT AIR LOGISTICS

CENTERS OR AIR LOGISTICS COMPLEXES.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research 

and development center to submit to the congressional defense 

committees, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the alignment, organizational reporting, military command structure, and performance rating 

of Air Force system program managers, sustainment program 

managers, and product support managers at Air Logistics Centers or Air Logistics Complexes. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following elements: 

(A) Consideration of the proposed reorganization of Air 

Force Materiel Command announced on November 2, 2011. 

(B) An assessment of how various alternatives for 

aligning the managers described in subsection (a) within 

Air Force Materiel Command would likely support and impact life cycle management, weapon system sustainment, 

and overall support to the warfighter. 

(C) With respect to the alignment of the managers described in subsection (A), an examination of how the Air 

Force should be organized to best conduct life cycle management and weapon system sustainment, with any analysis of cost and savings factors subject to the consideration 

of overall readiness. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
70 

(D) Recommended alternatives for meeting these objectives. 

(3) COOPERATION OF SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall provide any necessary information 

and background materials necessary for completion of the report required under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 327. CORE DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR CAPABILITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 2464. Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities 

‘‘(a) NECESSITY FOR CORE DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR CAPABILITIES.—(1) It is essential for national security that the 

Department of Defense maintain a core depot-level maintenance and 

repair capability, as defined by this title, in support of mission-essential weapon systems or items of military equipment needed to directly support combatant command operational requirements and 

enable the armed forces to execute the strategic, contingency, and 

emergency plans prepared by the Department of Defense, as required under section 153(a) of this title. 

‘‘(2) This core depot-level maintenance and repair capability 

shall be Government-owned and Government-operated, including 

the use of Government personnel and Government-owned and Government-operated equipment and facilities, throughout the lifecycle 

of the weapon system or item of military equipment involved to ensure a ready and controlled source of technical competence and resources necessary to ensure effective and timely response to a mobilization, national defense contingency situations, and other emergency 

requirements. 

‘‘(3)(A) Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall identify and establish the core depot-level maintenance 

and repair capabilities and capacity required in paragraph (1). 

‘‘(B) Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities and 

capacity, including the facilities, equipment, associated logistics capabilities, technical data, and trained personnel, shall be established not later than four years after a weapon system or item of 

military equipment achieves initial operational capability or is 

fielded in support of operations. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall assign Government-owned 

and Government-operated depot-level maintenance and repair facilities of the Department of Defense sufficient workload to ensure cost 

efficiency and technical competence in peacetime, while preserving 

the ability to provide an effective and timely response to a mobilization, national defense contingency situations, and other emergency 

requirements. 

‘‘(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may 

waive the requirement in subsection (a)(3) if the Secretary determines that— 

‘‘(A) the weapon system or item of military equipment is not 

an enduring element of the national defense strategy; 

‘‘(B) in the case of nuclear aircraft carrier refueling, fulfilling the requirement is not economically feasible; or 

‘‘(C) it is in the best interest of national security. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
71 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of a military department may waive the requirement in subsection (a)(3) for special access programs if such a 

waiver is determined to be in the best interest of the United States. 

‘‘(3) The determination to waive requirements in accordance 

with paragraph (1) or (2) shall be documented and notification submitted to Congress with justification for the waiver within 30 days 

of issuance. 

‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY TO COMMERCIAL ITEMS.—(1) The requirement in subsection (a)(3) shall not apply to items determined to be 

commercial items. 

‘‘(2) The first time a weapon system or other item of military 

equipment described in subsection (a) is determined to be a commercial item for the purposes of the exception under subsection (c), the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a notification of the 

determination, together with the justification for the determination. 

The justification for the determination shall include, at a minimum, 

the following: 

‘‘(A) The estimated percentage of commonality of parts of 

the version of the item that is sold or leased in the commercial 

marketplace and the version of the item to be purchased by the 

Department of Defense. 

‘‘(B) The value of any unique support and test equipment 

and tools needed to support the military requirements if the 

item were maintained by the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(C) A comparison of the estimated life-cycle depot-level 

maintenance and repair support costs that would be incurred 

by the Government if the item were maintained by the private 

sector with the estimated life-cycle depot-level maintenance support costs that would be incurred by the Government if the item 

were maintained by the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘commercial item’ means an 

end-item, assembly, subassembly, or part sold or leased in substantial quantities to the general public and purchased by the Department of Defense without modification in the same form that they are 

sold in the commercial marketplace, or with minor modifications to 

meet Federal Government requirements. 

‘‘(d) LIMITATION ON CONTRACTING.—(1) Except as provided in 

paragraph (2), performance of workload needed to maintain a core 

depot-level maintenance and repair capability identified by the Secretary under subsection (a)(3) may not be contracted for performance by non-Government personnel under the procedures and requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 or 

any successor administrative regulation or policy (hereinafter in this 

section referred to as ‘OMB Circular A-76’). 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense may waive paragraph (1) in the 

case of any such depot-level maintenance and repair capability and 

provide that performance of the workload needed to maintain that 

capability shall be considered for conversion to contractor performance in accordance with OMB Circular A-76. Any such waiver shall 

be made under regulations prescribed by the Secretary and shall be 

based on a determination by the Secretary that Government performance of the workload is no longer required for national defense 

reasons. Such regulations shall include criteria for determining 

whether Government performance of any such workload is no longer 

required for national defense reasons. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
72 

‘‘(3)(A) A waiver under paragraph (2) may not take effect until 

the expiration of the first period of 30 days of continuous session of 

Congress that begins on or after the date on which the Secretary 

submits a report on the waiver to the Committee on Armed Services 

and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A)— 

‘‘(i) continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment 

of Congress sine die; and 

‘‘(ii) the days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of any period of time in 

which Congress is in continuous session. 

‘‘(e) BIENNIAL CORE REPORT.—Not later than April 1 on each 

even-numbered year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report identifying, for each of the armed forces (except for 

the Coast Guard), for the subsequent fiscal year the following: 

‘‘(1) The core depot-level maintenance and repair capability 

requirements and sustaining workloads, organized by work 

breakdown structure, expressed in direct labor hours. 

‘‘(2) The corresponding workloads necessary to sustain core 

depot-level maintenance and repair capability requirements, expressed in direct labor hours and cost. 

‘‘(3) In any case where core depot-level maintenance and repair capability requirements exceed or are expected to exceed 

sustaining workloads, a detailed rationale for the shortfall and 

a plan either to correct, or mitigate, the effects of the shortfall. 

‘‘(f) ANNUAL CORE REPORT.— In 2013 and each year thereafter, 

not later than 60 days after the date on which the budget of the 

President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report identifying, for each of the armed forces (other than 

the Coast Guard), for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during 

which the report is submitted, each of the following: 

‘‘(1) The core depot-level maintenance and repair capability 

requirements identified in subsection (a)(3). 

‘‘(2) The workload required to cost-effectively support such 

requirements. 

‘‘(3) To the maximum extent practicable, the additional 

workload beyond the workloads identified under subsection 

(a)(4) needed to ensure that not more than 50 percent of the 

non-exempt depot maintenance funding is expended for performance by non-Federal governmental personnel in accordance 

with section 2466 of this title. 

‘‘(4) The allocation of workload for each Center of Industrial and Technical Excellence as designated in accordance with 

section 2474 of this title. 

‘‘(5) The depot-level maintenance and repair capital investments required to be made in order to ensure compliance with 

subsection (a)(3) by not later than four years after achieving initial operational capacity. 

‘‘(6) The outcome of a reassessment of continuation of a 

waiver granted under subsection (b). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
73 

‘‘(g) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.—The Comptroller General shall review each report required under subsections (e) and (f) 

for completeness and compliance and provide findings and recommendations to the congressional defense committees not later 

than 60 days after the report is submitted to Congress.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 146 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2464 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘2464. Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities.’’. 

Subtitle D—Readiness 

SEC. 331. MODIFICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY 

TO ACCEPT VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS OF FUNDS. 

The second sentence of subsection (g) of section 358 of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4201; 49 U.S.C. 44718 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘shall be available’’ and inserting ‘‘shall remain available until expended’’; and 

(2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: 

‘‘or to conduct studies of potential measures to mitigate such 

impacts’’. 

SEC. 332. REVIEW OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES AFFECTING NAVIGABLE 

AIRSPACE. 

Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) REVIEW OF AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.—The Administrator of 

the Federal Aviation Administration shall develop procedures to 

allow the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland 

Security to review and comment on an aeronautical study conducted 

pursuant to subsection (b) prior to the completion of the study.’’. 

Subtitle E—Reports 

SEC. 341. ANNUAL CERTIFICATION AND MODIFICATIONS OF ANNUAL 

REPORT ON PREPOSITIONED MATERIEL AND EQUIPMENT. 

(a) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—Section 2229 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

subsection: 

‘‘(d) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—(1) Not later than the date of the 

submission of the President’s budget request for a fiscal year under 

section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees certification in writing that the 

prepositioned stocks of each of the military departments meet all operations plans, in both fill and readiness, that are in effect as of the 

date of the submission of the certification. 

‘‘(2) If, for any year, the Secretary cannot certify that any of the 

prepositioned stocks meet such operations plans, the Secretary shall 

include with the certification for that year a list of the operations 

plans affected, a description of any measures that have been taken 

to mitigate any risk associated with prepositioned stock shortfalls, 

and an anticipated timeframe for the replenishment of the stocks. 

‘‘(3) A certification under this subsection shall be in an unclassified form but may have a classified annex.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
74 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 2229a(a) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

paragraphs: 

‘‘(7) A list of any non-standard items slated for inclusion in 

the prepositioned stocks and a plan for funding the inclusion 

and sustainment of such items. 

‘‘(8) A list of any equipment used in support of Operation 

Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring 

Freedom slated for retrograde and subsequent inclusion in the 

prepositioned stocks. 

‘‘(9) An efficiency strategy for limited shelf-life medical 

stock replacement. 

‘‘(10) The status of efforts to develop a joint strategy, integrate service requirements, and eliminate redundancies. 

‘‘(11) The operational planning assumptions used in the 

formulation of prepositioned stock levels and composition. 

‘‘(12) A list of any strategic plans affected by changes to the 

levels, composition, or locations of the prepositioned stocks and 

a description of any action taken to mitigate any risk that such 

changes may create.’’. 

SEC. 342. ADDITIONAL MATTERS FOR INCLUSION IN AND MODIFIED 

DEADLINE FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT ON OPERATIONAL 

ENERGY. 

Section 2925(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (F), as redesignated by 

section 314, as subparagraph (G); and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (E), as added by such 

section, the following new subparagraph (F): 

‘‘(F) An evaluation of practices used in contingency operations during the previous fiscal year and potential improvements to such practices to reduce vulnerabilities associated with 

fuel convoys, including improvements in tent and structure efficiency, improvements in generator efficiency, and displacement 

of liquid fuels with on-site renewable energy generation. Such 

evaluation should identify challenges associated with the deployment of more efficient structures and equipment and renewable energy generation, and recommendations for overcoming 

such challenges.’’. 

SEC. 343. STUDY ON AIR FORCE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE INFRASTRUCTURE. 

(a) STUDY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a study on the ability of the major air test and training 

range infrastructure, including major military operating area 

airspace and special use airspace, to support the full spectrum 

of Air Force operations. The Secretary shall incorporate the results of the study into a master plan for requirements and proposed investments to meet Air Force training and test needs 

through 2025. The study and the master plan shall be known 

as the ‘‘2025 Air Test and Training Range Enhancement Plan’’. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall, 

in conducting the study required under paragraph (1), consult 

with the Secretaries of the other military departments to determine opportunities for joint use and training of the ranges, and 

to assess the requirements needed to support combined arms 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
75 

training on the ranges. The Secretary shall also consult with 

the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, 

the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Energy Regulation Commission, and the Department of Energy to assess the 

need for transfers of administrative control of certain parcels of 

airspace and land to the Department of Defense to protect the 

missions and control of the ranges. 

(3) CONTINUATION OF RANGE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS.—The Secretary of the Air Force may proceed with all 

ongoing and scheduled range infrastructure improvements 

while conducting the study required under paragraph (1). 

(b) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees an interim report 

and a final report on the plan to meet the requirements under 

subsection (a) not later than one year and two years, respectively, after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) CONTENT.—The plan submitted under paragraph (1) 

shall— 

(A) document the current condition and adequacy of 

the major Air Force test and training range infrastructure 

in the United States to meet test and training requirements; 

(B) identify potential areas of concern for maintaining 

the physical safety, security, and current operating environment of such infrastructure; 

(C) identify potential issues and threats related to the 

sustainability of the test and training infrastructure, including electromagnetic spectrum encroachment, overall 

bandwidth availability, and protection of classified information; 

(D) assess coordination among ranges and local, state, 

regional, and Federal entities involved in land use planning, and develop recommendations on how to improve 

communication and coordination of such entities; 

(E) propose remedies and actions to manage economic 

development on private lands on or surrounding the test 

and training infrastructure to preserve current capabilities; 

(F) identify critical parcels of land not currently under 

the control of the Air Force for acquisition of deed or restrictive easements in order to protect current operations, 

access and egress corridors, and range boundaries, or to expand the capability of the air test and training ranges; 

(G) identify which parcels identified pursuant to subparagraph (F) could, through the acquisition of conservation easements, serve military interests while also preserving recreational access to public and private lands, protecting wildlife habitat, or preserving opportunities for energy development and energy transmission; 

(H) prioritize improvements and modernization of the 

facilities, equipment, and technology supporting the infrastructure in order to provide a test and training environment that accurately simulates and or portrays the full 

spectrum of threats and targets of likely United States adversaries in 2025; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
76 

(I) incorporate emerging requirements generated by requirements for virtual training and new weapon systems, 

including the F–22, the F–35, space and cyber systems, and 

Remotely Piloted Aircraft; 

(J) assess the value of State and local legislative initiatives to protect Air Force test and training range infrastructure; 

(K) identify parcels with no value to future military operations; 

(L) propose a list of prioritized projects, easements, acquisitions, or other actions, including estimated costs required to upgrade the test and training range infrastructure, taking into consideration the criteria set forth in this 

paragraph; and 

(M) explore opportunities to increase foreign military 

training with United States allies at test and training 

ranges in the continental United States. 

(3) FORM.—Each report required under this subsection 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex as necessary. 

(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The reports submitted under 

this section shall not be construed as meeting the requirements 

of section 2815(d) of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 852). 

SEC. 344. STUDY ON TRAINING RANGE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES. 

(a) STUDY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commander of the United States 

Special Operations Command shall conduct a study on the ability of existing training ranges used by special operations forces, 

including military operating area airspace and special use airspace, to support the full spectrum of missions and operations 

assigned to special operations forces. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—The Commander shall, in conducting 

the study required under paragraph (1), consult with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, and the Joint Staff on— 

(A) procedures and priorities for joint use and training 

on ranges operated by the military services, and to assess 

the requirements needed to support combined arms training 

on the ranges; and 

(B) requirements and proposed investments to meet 

special operations training requirements through 2025. 

(b) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Commander shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the plan to meet 

the requirements under subsection (a). 

(2) CONTENT.—The study submitted under paragraph (1) 

shall— 

(A) assess the current condition and adequacy of, and 

access to, all existing training ranges in the United States 

used by special operations forces; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
77 

(B) identify potential areas of concern for maintaining 

the physical safety, security, and current operating environment of ranges used by special operations forces; 

(C) identify issues and challenges related to the availability and sustainability of the existing training ranges 

used by special operations forces, including support of a 

full spectrum of operations and protection of classified missions and tactics; 

(D) assess coordination among ranges and local, State, 

regional, and Federal entities involved in land use planning and the protection of ranges from encroachment; 

(E) propose remedies and actions to ensure consistent 

and prioritized access to existing ranges; 

(F) prioritize improvements and modernization of the 

facilities, equipment, and technology supporting the ranges 

in order to adequately simulate the full spectrum of threats 

and contingencies for special operations forces; and 

(G) propose a list of prioritized projects, easements, acquisitions, or other actions, including estimated costs required to upgrade training range infrastructure. 

(3) FORM.—Each report required under this subsection 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex as necessary. 

SEC. 345. GUIDANCE TO ESTABLISH NON-TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE 

AND EQUIPMENT SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS 

TO ACHIEVE COST SAVINGS. 

Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey of the quantity 

and condition of each class of non-tactical wheeled vehicles and 

base-level commercial equipment in the fleets of the military departments and report to the congressional defense committees on the advisability of establishing service life extension programs for such 

classes of vehicles. 

SEC. 346. STUDY ON UNITED STATES FORCE POSTURE IN THE UNITED 

STATES PACIFIC COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. 

(a) INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

shall commission an independent assessment of United States 

security interests in the United States Pacific Command area of 

responsibility. The assessment shall be conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt 

from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, and has recognized 

credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs with ready access to policy experts throughout the country 

and from the region. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment conducted pursuant to 

paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) A review of current and emerging United States national security interests in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
78 

(B) A review of current United States military force 

posture and deployment plans of the United States Pacific 

Command. 

(C) Options for the realignment of United States forces 

in the region to respond to new opportunities presented by 

allies and partners. 

(D) The views of noted policy leaders and regional experts, including military commanders in the region. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the designated private entity shall provide an unclassified report, with a classified annex, containing its findings to 

the Secretary of Defense. Not later than 90 days after the date of 

receipt of the report, the Secretary of Defense shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such 

comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 301 for operation and 

maintenance for Defense-wide activities, up to $1,000,000, shall be 

made available for the completion of the study required under this 

section. 

SEC. 347. STUDY ON OVERSEAS BASING PRESENCE OF UNITED STATES 

FORCES. 

(a) INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

commission an independent assessment of the overseas basing presence of United States forces. 

(b) CONDUCT OF ASSESSMENT.—The assessment required by 

subsection (a) may, at the election of the Secretary, be conducted 

by— 

(1) a Federally-funded research and development center 

(FFRDC); or 

(2) an independent, non-governmental institute which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, 

and has recognized credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs appropriate for the assessment. 

(c) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by subsection (a) 

should include, but not be limited to, the following: 

(1) An assessment of the location and number of United 

States forces required to be forward based outside the United 

States in order to meet the National Military Strategy, 2010, 

the quadrennial defense review, and the engagement strategies 

and operational plans of the combatant commands. 

(2) An assessment of— 

(A) the current condition and capacity of the available 

military facilities and training ranges of the United States 

overseas for all permanent stations and deployed locations, 

including land and improvements at such facilities and 

ranges and the availability of additional land, if required, 

for such facilities and ranges; and 

(B) the cost of maintaining such infrastructure. 

(3) A determination of the amounts received by the United 

States, whether in direct payments, in-kind contributions, or 

otherwise, from foreign countries by reason of military facilities 

of the United States overseas. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
79 

(4) A determination of the amounts paid by the United 

States in direct payments to foreign countries for the use of facilities, ranges, and lands. 

(5) An assessment of the advisability of the retention, closure, or realignment of military facilities of the United States 

overseas, or of the establishment of new military facilities of the 

United States overseas, in light of potential fiscal constraints on 

the Department of Defense and emerging national security requirements in coming years. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary an 

unclassified report, with a classified annex (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the assessment. Not later than 90 

days after the date of receipt of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with 

such comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(e) FUNDING.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by 

section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 

4301, up to $2,000,000 shall be made available for the completion 

of the assessment required by subsection (a). 

SEC. 348. INCLUSION OF ASSESSMENT OF JOINT MILITARY TRAINING 

AND FORCE ALLOCATIONS IN QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE 

REVIEW AND NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY. 

The assessments of the National Military Strategy conducted by 

the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under section 153(b) of 

this title, and the quadrennial roles and missions review pursuant 

to section 118b of this title, shall include an assessment of joint 

military training and force allocations to determine— 

(1) the compliance of the military departments with the 

joint training, doctrine, and resource allocation recommendations promulgated by the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and 

(2) the effectiveness of the Joint Staff in carrying out the 

missions of planning and experimentation formerly accomplished by Joint Forces Command. 

SEC. 349. MODIFICATION OF REPORT ON PROCUREMENT OF MILITARY 

WORKING DOGS. 

Subsection (c) of section 358 of the Duncan Hunter National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 

417; 122 Stat. 4427; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading by striking ‘‘ANNUAL REPORT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘BIENNIAL REPORT’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘annually thereafter for each of the following 

five years’’ and inserting ‘‘biennially thereafter’’; 

(3) by striking ‘‘for the fiscal year preceding’’ and inserting 

‘‘for the two fiscal years preceding’’; 

(4) by striking the second sentence; and 

(5) by striking ‘‘for the fiscal year covered by the report’’ 

and inserting ‘‘for the period covered by the report’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
80 

Subtitle F—Limitations and Extension of Authority 

SEC. 351. ADOPTION OF MILITARY WORKING DOG BY FAMILY OF DECEASED OR SERIOUSLY WOUNDED MEMBER OF THE 

ARMED FORCES WHO WAS THE DOG’S HANDLER. 

Section 2583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(2) by inserting after ‘‘extraordinary circumstances’’ the following: ‘‘, including circumstances under 

which the handler of a military working dog is killed in action, 

dies of wounds received in action, or is medically retired as a 

result of injuries received in action,’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following: ‘‘If 

the Secretary of the military department concerned determines 

that an adoption is justified under subsection (a)(2) under circumstances under which the handler of a military working dog 

is wounded in action, the dog may be made available for adoption only by the handler. If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that such an adoption is justified 

under circumstances under which the handler of a military 

working dog is killed in action or dies of wounds received in action, the military working dog shall be made available for 

adoption only by a parent, child, spouse, or sibling of the deceased handler.’’. 

SEC. 352. PROHIBITION ON EXPANSION OF THE AIR FORCE FOOD 

TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE. 

The Secretary of the Air Force may not expand the Air Force 

food transformation initiative (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘initiative’’) to include any base other than the six bases initially included 

in the pilot program until the Secretary of the Air Force submits to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the initiative. Such report shall include the 

following: 

(1) A description of the effects of the initiative on all employees who are paid through nonappropriated funds. 

(2) A description of the training programs being developed 

to assist the transition for all employees affected by the initiative. 

(3) An explanation of how appropriated and non-appropriated funds used in the initiative are being tracked to ensure 

that such funds remain segregated. 

(4) An estimate of the cost savings and efficiencies associated with the initiative, and an explanation of how such savings are achieved. 

(5) An assessment of increases in food prices at both the appropriated facilities on the military bases participating in the 

initiative as of the date of the enactment of this Act and the 

non-appropriated funded facilities on such bases. 

(6) A plan for addressing any recommendations made by 

the Comptroller General of the United States following the 

Comptroller General’s review of the initiative. 

SEC. 353. DESIGNATION AND LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE MIGRATION OF ARMY ENTERPRISE EMAIL SERVICES. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary of the Army shall designate 

the effort to consolidate its enterprise email services a formal acquisition program with the Army acquisition executive as the milestone 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
81 

decision authority. The Secretary of the Army may not delegate the 

authority under this subsection. 

(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department 

of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for procurement or operation and 

maintenance for the migration to enterprise email services by the 

Department of the Army may be obligated or expended until the 

date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Army 

submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the acquisition strategy for the acquisition program designated under subsection (a), including certification that existing and planned efforts 

for the program comply with all existing regulations pertaining to 

competition. The report shall include each of the following: 

(1) A description of the formal acquisition oversight body 

established. 

(2) An assessment by the acquisition oversight body of the 

sufficiency and completeness of the current validated requirements and analysis of alternatives. 

(3) In any instances where the validated requirements or 

analysis of alternatives has been determined to be insufficient, 

a plan for remediation. 

(4) An assessment by the Army Audit Agency to determine 

the cost savings and cost avoidance expected from each of the 

alternatives to be considered. 

(5) An assessment of the technical challenges to implementing the selected approach, including a security assessment. 

(6) A certification by the Secretary of the Army that the selected approach for moving forward is in the best technical and 

financial interests of the Army and provides for the maximum 

amount of competition possible in accordance with section 

2302(3)(D) of title 10, United States Code. 

(7) A detailed accounting of the funding expended by the 

program as of the date of the enactment of this Act, as well as 

an estimate of the funding needed to complete the selected approach. 

(c) REPORT BY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense plans for enterprise email. 

Such report shall include— 

(1) an assessment of how the migration of the Army’s email 

system to the Defense Information Services Agency fits within 

the Department’s strategic information technology plans; 

(2) a description of how the Chief Information Officer is addressing the email capabilities of the other military departments, including plans for consolidating the email services of 

the other military departments; and 

(3) a description of the degree to which fair and open competition will be or has been used to modernize the existing infrastructure to which the Army is migrating its email services, 

including a roadmap detailing when elements of the architecture will be upgraded over time. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
82 

SEC. 354. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM FOR AVAILABILITY OF WORKING-CAPITAL FUNDS TO ARMY FOR CERTAIN PRODUCT IMPROVEMENTS. 

Section 330(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 68) is amended by 

striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2014’’. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

SEC. 361. COMMERCIAL SALE OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION AND 

SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION COMPONENTS IN EXCESS OF 

MILITARY REQUIREMENTS, AND FIRED CARTRIDGE 

CASES. 

Section 346 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4191; 10 

U.S.C. 2576 note) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 346. COMMERCIAL SALE OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION AND 

SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION COMPONENTS IN EXCESS OF 

MILITARY REQUIREMENTS, AND FIRED CARTRIDGE 

CASES. 

‘‘(a) COMMERCIAL SALE OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION, SMALL

AMMUNITION COMPONENTS, AND FIRED CARTRIDGE CASES.—Small 

arms ammunition and small ammunition components which are in 

excess of military requirements, and intact fired small arms cartridge cases shall be made available for commercial sale. Such 

small arms ammunition, small arms ammunition components, and 

intact fired cartridge cases shall not be demilitarized, destroyed, or 

disposed of, unless in excess of commercial demands or certified by 

the Secretary of Defense as unserviceable or unsafe. This provision 

shall not apply to ammunition, ammunition components, or fired 

cartridge cases stored or expended outside the continental United 

States (OCONUS). 

‘‘(b) DEADLINE FOR GUIDANCE.—Not later than 90 days after the 

date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to 

ensure compliance with subsection (a). Not later than 15 days after 

issuing such guidance, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a letter of compliance providing notice of 

such guidance. 

‘‘(c) PREFERENCE.—No small arms ammunition or small arms 

ammunition components in excess of military requirements, or fired 

small arms cartridge cases may be made available for commercial 

sale under this section before such ammunition and ammunition 

components are offered for transfer or purchase, as authorized by 

law, to another Federal department or agency or for sale to State 

and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and 

emergency management agencies pursuant to section 2576 of title 

10, United States Code, as amended by this Act. 

‘‘(d) SALES CONTROLS.—All small arms ammunition and small 

arms ammunition components, and fired small arms cartridge cases 

made available for commercial sale under this section shall be subject to all explosives safety and trade security controls in effect at 

the time of sale. 

‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION.—The term ‘small arms ammunition’ means ammunition or ordnance for firearms up to 

and including .50 caliber and for shotguns. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
83 

‘‘(2) SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION COMPONENTS.—The term 

‘small arms ammunition components’ means components, parts, 

accessories, and attachments associated with small arms ammunition. 

‘‘(3) FIRED CARTRIDGE CASES.—The term ‘fired cartridge 

cases’ means expended small arms cartridge cases (ESACC).’’. 

SEC. 362. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF SPACE-AVAILABLE 

TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall conduct a review of the Department of Defense system 

for space-available travel. The review shall determine the capacity 

of the system presently and as projected in the future and shall examine the efficiency and usage of space-available travel. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The review required under subsection (a) shall 

include the following elements: 

(1) A discussion of the efficiency of the system and data regarding usage of available space by category of passengers 

under existing regulations. 

(2) Estimates of the effect on availability based on future 

projections. 

(3) A discussion of the logistical and managements problems, including congestion at terminals, waiting times, lodging 

availability, and personal hardships currently experienced by 

travelers. 

(4) An evaluation of the cost of the system and whether 

space-available travel is and can remain cost-neutral. 

(5) An evaluation of the feasibility of expanding the categories of passengers eligible for space-available travel to include— 

(A) in the case of overseas travel, retired members of an 

active or reserve component, including retired members of 

reserve components, who, but for being under the eligibility 

age applicable to the member under section 12731 title 10, 

United States Code, would be eligible for retired pay under 

chapter 1223 of such title; and 

(B) unremarried widows and widowers of active or reserve component members of the Armed Forces. 

(6) Other factors relating to the efficiency and cost effectiveness of space-available travel. 

SEC. 363. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR MARITIME 

SAFETY OF FORCES AND HYDROGRAPHIC SUPPORT. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Part IV of subtitle C of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 

‘‘CHAPTER 669—MARITIME SAFETY OF FORCES 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘7921. Safety and effectiveness information; hydrographic information. 

‘‘§ 7921. Safety and effectiveness information; hydrographic 

information 

‘‘(a) SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION.—(1) The Secretary of the Navy shall maximize the safety and effectiveness of all 

maritime vessels, aircraft, and forces of the armed forces by means 

of— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
84 

‘‘(A) marine data collection; 

‘‘(B) numerical weather and ocean prediction; and 

‘‘(C) forecasting of hazardous weather and ocean conditions. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary may extend similar support to forces of the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and to coalition forces, that are 

operating with the armed forces. 

‘‘(b) HYDROGRAPHIC INFORMATION.—The Secretary of the Navy 

shall collect, process, and provide to the Director of the National 

Geospatial-Intelligence Agency hydrographic information to support 

preparation of maps, charts, books, and geodetic products by that 

Agency.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle C of such title, and the table of chapters at the beginning of part IV of such subtitle, are each amended by inserting 

after the item relating to chapter 667 the following new item: 

‘‘669. Maritime Safety of Forces ....................................................................... 7921’’. 

SEC. 364. DEPOSIT OF REIMBURSED FUNDS UNDER RECIPROCAL FIRE 

PROTECTION AGREEMENTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 5 of the Act of May 

27, 1955 (42 U.S.C. 1856d(b)) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a), all sums received as reimbursements for costs incurred by any Department of Defense activity 

for fire protection rendered pursuant to this Act shall be credited to 

the same appropriation or fund from which the expenses were paid 

or, if the period of availability for obligation for that appropriation 

has expired, to the appropriation or fund that is currently available 

to the activity for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be 

subject to the same provisions and restrictions as the appropriation 

or account to which credited.’’. 

(b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to reimbursements for expenditures of funds 

appropriated after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 365. CLARIFICATION OF THE AIRLIFT SERVICE DEFINITIONS RELATIVE TO THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET. 

(a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 41106 of title 49, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsections (a)(1), (b), and (c), by striking ‘‘transport 

category aircraft’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘CRAFeligible aircraft’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘that has aircraft in the 

civil reserve air fleet’’ and inserting ‘‘referred to in subsection 

(a)’’. 

(b) CRAF-ELIGIBLE AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—Such section is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) CRAF-ELIGIBLE AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 

‘CRAF-eligible aircraft’ means aircraft of a type the Secretary of Defense has determined to be eligible to participate in the civil reserve 

air fleet.’’. 

SEC. 366. RATEMAKING PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET 

CONTRACTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 931 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 9511 the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
85 

‘‘§ 9511a. Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts: payment rate 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense shall determine a 

fair and reasonable rate of payment for airlift services provided to 

the Department of Defense by air carriers who are participants in 

the Civil Reserve Air Fleet program. 

‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

regulations for purposes of subsection (a). The Secretary may exclude from the applicability of those regulations any airlift services 

contract made through the use of competitive procedures. 

‘‘(c) COMMITMENT OF AIRCRAFT AS A BUSINESS FACTOR.—The 

Secretary may, in determining the quantity of business to be received under an airlift services contract for which the rate of payment is determined in accordance with subsection (a), use as a factor the relative amount of airlift capability committed by each air 

carrier to the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. 

‘‘(d) INAPPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW.—An airlift services contract for which the rate of payment is determined in accordance 

with subsection (a) shall not be subject to the provisions of section 

2306a of this title or to the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of 

section 1502 of title 41.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 9511 the following new item: 

‘‘9511a. Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts: payment rate.’’. 

(c) INITIAL REGULATIONS.—Regulations shall be prescribed 

under section 9511a(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by 

subsection (a), not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 367. POLICY ON ACTIVE SHOOTER TRAINING FOR CERTAIN LAW 

ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL. 

The Secretary of Defense shall establish policy and promulgate 

guidelines to ensure civilian and military law enforcement personnel charged with security functions on military installations 

shall receive Active Shooter Training as described in finding 4.3 of 

the document entitled ‘‘Protecting the Force: Lessons From Fort 

Hood’’. 

SEC. 368. PROCUREMENT OF TENTS OR OTHER TEMPORARY STRUCTURES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—In procuring tents or other temporary structures for use by the Armed Forces, and in establishing or maintaining an alternative source for such tents and structures, the Secretary 

of Defense shall award contracts that provide the best value to the 

United States. In determining the best value to the United States 

under this section, the Secretary shall consider the total life-cycle 

costs of such tents or structures, including the costs associated with 

any equipment or fuel needed to heat or cool such tents or structures. 

(b) INTERAGENCY PROCUREMENT.—The requirements of this section shall apply to any agency or department of the United States 

that procures tents or other temporary structures on behalf of the 

Department of Defense. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
86 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2012 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for 

operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES. 

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2012, as follows: 

(1) The Army, 562,000. 

(2) The Navy, 325,700. 

(3) The Marine Corps, 202,100. 

(4) The Air Force, 332,800. 

SEC. 402. REVISION IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 

MINIMUM LEVELS. 

Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new 

paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) For the Army, 547,400. 

‘‘(2) For the Navy, 325,700. 

‘‘(3) For the Marine Corps, 202,100. 

‘‘(4) For the Air Force, 332,800.’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths 

for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2012, as follows: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 

358,200. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 66,200. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 106,700. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 71,400. 

(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 10,000. 

(b) END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS.—The end strengths prescribed 

by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component 

shall be proportionately reduced by— 

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve 

as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are 

on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal 

year; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
87 

(2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at 

the end of the fiscal year. 

(c) END STRENGTH INCREASES.—Whenever units or individual 

members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve 

component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized 

strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual 

members. 

SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES. 

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2012, the following number of Reserves to be serving on 

full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the 

National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,337. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,833. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,662. 

SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS). 

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as 

of the last day of fiscal year 2012 for the reserve components of the 

Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, 

United States Code) shall be the following: 

(1) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. 

(2) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

27,210. 

(3) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,777. 

(4) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 

22,509. 

SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2012 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 

STATUS TECHNICIANS. 

(a) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in 

section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number 

of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard 

as of September 30, 2012, may not exceed the following: 

(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

1,600. 

(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 

350. 

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2012, 

may not exceed 595. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
88 

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status 

technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 

30, 2012, may not exceed 90. 

(b) NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘non-dual status technician’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED 

TO BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT. 

During fiscal year 2012, the maximum number of members of 

the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at 

any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) 

of title 10, United States Code, is the following: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2012 for the use of the 

Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department 

of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. 

(b) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORIZATION.—The authorization of 

appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization 

of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal 

year 2012. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Increase in authorized strengths for Marine Corps officers on active duty 

in grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel. 

Sec. 502. General officer and flag officer reform. 

Sec. 503. National Defense University outplacement waiver. 

Sec. 504. Voluntary retirement incentive matters. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Leadership of National Guard Bureau. 

Sec. 512. Membership of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau on the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. 

Sec. 513. Modification of time in which preseparation counseling must be provided 

to reserve component members being demobilized. 

Sec. 514. Clarification of applicability of authority for deferral of mandatory separation of military technicians (dual status) until age 60. 

Sec. 515. Authority to order Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, 

and Air Force Reserve to active duty to provide assistance in response 

to a major disaster or emergency. 

Sec. 516. Authority for order to active duty of units of the Selected Reserve for 

preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands. 

Sec. 517. Modification of eligibility for consideration for promotion for reserve officers employed as military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 518. Consideration of reserve component officers for appointment to certain 

command positions. 

Sec. 519. Report on termination of military technician as a distinct personnel management category. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
89 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Sense of Congress on the unique nature, demands, and hardships of military service. 

Sec. 522. Policy addressing dwell time and measurement and data collection regarding unit operating tempo and personnel tempo. 

Sec. 523. Protected communications by members of the Armed Forces and prohibition of retaliatory personnel actions. 

Sec. 524. Notification requirement for determination made in response to review of 

proposal for award of Medal of Honor not previously submitted in timely fashion. 

Sec. 525. Expansion of regular enlisted members covered by early discharge authority. 

Sec. 526. Extension of voluntary separation pay and benefits authority. 

Sec. 527. Prohibition on denial of reenlistment of members for unsuitability based 

on the same medical condition for which they were determined to be fit 

for duty. 

Sec. 528. Designation of persons authorized to direct disposition of remains of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 529. Matters covered by preseparation counseling for members of the Armed 

Forces and their spouses. 

Sec. 530. Conversion of high-deployment allowance from mandatory to authorized. 

Sec. 531. Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance 

retention of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 533. Department of Defense suicide prevention program. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice and Legal Matters 

Sec. 541. Reform of offenses relating to rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 542. Authority to compel production of documentary evidence. 

Sec. 543. Clarification of application and extent of direct acceptance of gifts authority. 

Sec. 544. Freedom of conscience of military chaplains with respect to the performance of marriages. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration 

Sec. 551. Employment skills training for members of the Armed Forces on active 

duty who are transitioning to civilian life. 

Sec. 552. Enhancement of authorities on joint professional military education. 

Sec. 553. Temporary authority to waive maximum age limitation on admission to 

the military service academies. 

Sec. 554. Enhancement of administration of the United States Air Force Institute of 

Technology. 

Sec. 555. Enrollment of certain seriously wounded, ill, or injured former or retired 

enlisted members of the Armed Forces in associate degree programs of 

the Community College of the Air Force in order to complete degree program. 

Sec. 556. Reserve component mental health student stipend. 

Sec. 557. Fiscal year 2012 administration and report on the Troops-to-Teachers Program. 

Sec. 558. Pilot program on receipt of civilian credentialing for skills required for 

military occupational specialties. 

Sec. 559. Report on certain education assistance programs. 

Subtitle F—Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Sec. 561. Control and administration by Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 562. Senior Medical Advisor oversight of health care provided to residents of 

Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 563. Establishment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Advisory Council and 

Resident Advisory Committees. 

Sec. 564. Administrators, Ombudsmen, and staff of facilities. 

Sec. 565. Revision of fee requirements. 

Sec. 566. Revision of inspection requirements. 

Sec. 567. Repeal of obsolete transitional provisions and technical, conforming, and 

clerical amendments. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
90 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 571. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 572. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 

Sec. 573. Three-year extension and enhancement of authorities on transition of military dependent students among local educational agencies. 

Sec. 574. Revision to membership of Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council. 

Sec. 575. Reemployment rights following certain National Guard duty. 

Sec. 576. Expansion of Operation Hero Miles. 

Sec. 577. Report on Department of Defense autism pilot and demonstration projects. 

Sec. 578. Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of Defense 

military spouse employment programs. 

Subtitle H—Improved Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in the Armed Forces 

Sec. 581. Access of sexual assault victims to legal assistance and services of Sexual 

Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. 

Sec. 582. Consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer based on humanitarian conditions for victim of sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 583. Director of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 

Sec. 584. Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. 

Sec. 585. Training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program. 

Sec. 586. Department of Defense policy and procedures on retention and access to 

evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of 

the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 588. Department of Defense authority to carry out personnel recovery reintegration and post-isolation support activities. 

Sec. 589. Military adaptive sports program. 

Sec. 590. Enhancement and improvement of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. 

Sec. 591. Army National Military Cemeteries. 

Sec. 592. Inspection of military cemeteries under jurisdiction of the military departments. 

Sec. 593. Authorization for award of the distinguished service cross for Captain 

Fredrick L. Spaulding for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 594. Authorization and request for award of Medal of Honor to Emil Kapaun 

for acts of valor during the Korean War. 

Sec. 595. Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to Jewish American World 

War I veterans. 

Sec. 596. Report on process for expedited determination of disability of members of 

the Armed Forces with certain disabling conditions. 

Sec. 597. Comptroller General study of military necessity of Selective Service System 

and alternatives. 

Sec. 598. Evaluation of issues affecting disposition of remains of American sailors 

killed in the explosion of the ketch U.S.S. Intrepid in Tripoli Harbor on 

September 4, 1804. 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

SEC. 501. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED STRENGTHS FOR MARINE CORPS 

OFFICERS ON ACTIVE DUTY IN GRADES OF MAJOR, LIEUTENANT COLONEL, AND COLONEL. 

The table in subsection (a)(1) of section 523 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking the items relating to the total 

number of commissioned officers (excluding officers in categories 

specified in subsection (b) of such section) serving on active duty in 

the Marine Corps in the grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and 

colonel, respectively, and inserting the following new items: 

‘‘10,000 2,802 1,615 633

12,500 3,247 1,768 658

15,000 3,691 1,922 684


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
91 

17,500 4,135 2,076 710

20,000 4,579 2,230 736

22,500 5,024 2,383 762

25,000 5,468 2,537 787’’. 

SEC. 502. GENERAL OFFICER AND FLAG OFFICER REFORM. 

(a) REMOVAL OF CERTAIN POSITIONS FROM EXCEPTION TO DIS- TRIBUTION LIMITS.— (1) REMOVAL OF POSITIONS.—Subsection (b) of section 525 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) The limitations of subsection (a) do not include the following: 

‘‘(1) An officer released from a joint duty assignment, but 

only during the 60-day period beginning on the date the officer 

departs the joint duty assignment, except that the Secretary of 

Defense may authorize the Secretary of a military department 

to extend the 60-day period by an additional 120 days, but no 

more than three officers from each armed forces may be on active duty who are excluded under this paragraph. 

‘‘(2) The number of officers required to serve in joint duty 

assignments as authorized by the Secretary of Defense under 

section 526(b) for each military service.’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph 

(1) shall take effect on January 1, 2012. 

(b) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS

ON ACTIVE DUTY.— (1) LIMITATION; EXCLUSION FOR JOINT DUTY REQUIRE- MENTS.—Section 526 of such title is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘230’’ and inserting ‘‘231’’; 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘160’’ and inserting ‘‘161’’; 

(iii) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘208’’ and inserting ‘‘198’’; and 

(iv) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘60’’ and inserting ‘‘61’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)(2)(C), by striking ‘‘76’’ and inserting ‘‘73’’. 

(2) DISTRIBUTION LIMITATION.—Section 525(a) of such title 

is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘45’’ and inserting 

‘‘46’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘43’’ and inserting 

‘‘44’’; 

(C) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘32’’ and inserting 

‘‘33’’; and 

(D) in paragraph (4)(C), by striking ‘‘22’’ and inserting 

‘‘23’’. 

(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on October 1, 2013. 

(c) LIMITED EXCLUSION FOR JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS FROM

AUTHORIZED STRENGTH LIMITATION.— 

(1) EXCLUSION.—Subsection (b) of section 526 of such title 

is amended by striking ‘‘324’’ and inserting ‘‘310’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph 

(1) shall take effect on January 1, 2012. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
92 

(d) ELIMINATION OF COMPLETE EXCLUSION FOR OFFICERS SERVING IN CERTAIN INTELLIGENCE POSITIONS.— 

(1) ELIMINATION OF CURRENT BROAD EXCLUSION.—Section 

528 of such title is amended by striking subsections (b), (c), and 

(d) and inserting the following new subsections: 

‘‘(b) DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CIA.—When the position of Director or Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is held by an officer of the armed forces, the position, so long as 

the officer serves in the position, shall be designated, pursuant to 

subsection (b) of section 526 of this title, as one of the general officer 

and flag officer positions to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) of such section. 

‘‘(c) ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF MILITARY AFFAIRS, CIA.—When 

the position of Associate Director of Military Affairs, Central Intelligence Agency, or any successor position, is held by an officer of the 

armed forces, the position, so long as the officer serves in the position, shall be designated, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 526 

of this title, as one of the general officer and flag officer positions 

to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) of such section. 

‘‘(d) OFFICERS SERVING IN OFFICE OF DNI.—When a position in 

the Office of the Director of National Intelligence designated by 

agreement between the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence is held by a general officer or flag officer of the 

armed forces, the position, so long as the officer serves in the position, shall be designated, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 526 

of this title, as one of the general officer and flag officer positions 

to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) of such section. 

However, not more than five of such positions may be included 

among the excluded positions at any time.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 528. Officers serving in certain intelligence positions: military status; application of distribution and 

strength limitations; pay and allowances’’. 

(B) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 32 of such title is amended by striking 

the item relating to section 528 and inserting the following 

new item: 

‘‘528. Officers serving in certain intelligence positions: military status; application of 

distribution and strength limitations; pay and allowances.’’. 

SEC. 503. NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY OUTPLACEMENT WAIVER. 

(a) WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS NOT DESIGNATED AS

JOINT QUALIFIED OFFICERS.—Subsection (b) of section 663 of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ‘‘to a joint duty assignment’’ the following: ‘‘(or, as authorized by the Secretary in 

an individual case, to a joint assignment other than a joint 

duty assignment)’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the joint duty assignment’’ and inserting ‘‘the assignment’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
93 

(B) by striking ‘‘a joint duty assignment’’ and inserting 

‘‘such an assignment’’. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Such section is further amended by adding at 

the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) EXCEPTION FOR OFFICERS GRADUATING FROM OTHER-THANIN-RESIDENCE PROGRAMS.—(1) Subsection (a) does not apply to an 

officer graduating from a school within the National Defense University specified in subsection (c) following pursuit of a program on 

an other-than-in-residence basis. 

‘‘(2) Subsection (b) does not apply with respect to any group of 

officers graduating from a school within the National Defense University specified in subsection (c) following pursuit of a program on 

an other-than-in-residence basis.’’. 

SEC. 504. VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE MATTERS. 

(a) ADDITIONAL VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 638a the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 638b. Voluntary retirement incentive 

‘‘(a) INCENTIVE FOR VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FOR CERTAIN OFFICERS.—The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a 

military department to provide a voluntary retirement incentive 

payment in accordance with this section to an officer of the armed 

forces under that Secretary’s jurisdiction who is specified in subsection (c) as being eligible for such a payment. 

‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) Any authority provided the Secretary of 

a military department under this section shall expire as specified by 

the Secretary of Defense, but not later than December 31, 2018. 

‘‘(2) The total number of officers who may be provided a voluntary retirement incentive payment under this section may not exceed 675 officers. 

‘‘(c) ELIGIBLE OFFICERS.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph 

(2), an officer of the armed forces is eligible for a voluntary retirement incentive payment under this section if the officer— 

‘‘(A) has served on active duty for more than 20 years, but 

not more than 29 years, on the approved date of retirement; 

‘‘(B) meets the minimum length of commissioned service requirement for voluntary retirement as a commissioned officer in 

accordance with section 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, as applicable to that officer; 

‘‘(C) on the approved date of retirement, has 12 months or 

more remaining on active-duty service before reaching the maximum retirement years of active service for the member’s grade 

as specified in section 633 or 634 of this title; 

‘‘(D) on the approved date of retirement, has 12 months or 

more remaining on active-duty service before reaching the maximum retirement age under any other provision of law; and 

‘‘(E) meets any additional requirements for such eligibility 

as is specified by the Secretary concerned, including any requirement relating to years of service, skill rating, military specialty or competitive category, grade, any remaining period of 

obligated service, or any combination thereof. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
94 

‘‘(2) The following officers are not eligible for a voluntary retirement incentive payment under this section: 

‘‘(A) An officer being evaluated for disability under chapter 

61 of this title. 

‘‘(B) An officer projected to be retired under section 1201 or 

1204 of this title. 

‘‘(C) An officer projected to be discharged with disability 

severance pay under section 1212 of this title. 

‘‘(D) A member transferred to the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of this title. 

‘‘(E) An officer subject to pending disciplinary action or 

subject to administrative separation or mandatory discharge 

under any other provision of law or regulation. 

‘‘(d) AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.—The amount of the voluntary retirement incentive payment paid an officer under this section shall be 

an amount determined by the Secretary concerned, but not to exceed 

an amount equal to 12 times the amount of the officer’s monthly 

basic pay at the time of the officer’s retirement. The amount may be 

paid in a lump sum at the time of retirement. 

‘‘(e) REPAYMENT FOR MEMBERS WHO RETURN TO ACTIVE

DUTY.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a member of the 

armed forces who, after having received all or part of a voluntary 

retirement incentive under this section, returns to active duty shall 

have deducted from each payment of basic pay, in such schedule of 

monthly installments as the Secretary concerned shall specify, until 

the total amount deducted from such basic pay equals the total 

amount of voluntary retirement incentive received. 

‘‘(2) Members who are involuntarily recalled to active duty or 

full-time National Guard duty under any provision of law shall not 

be subject to this subsection. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense may waive, in whole or in part, 

repayment required under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines 

that recovery would be against equity and good conscience or would 

be contrary to the best interest of the United States. The authority 

in this paragraph may be delegated only to the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Principal Deputy 

Under Secretary of Defense of Personnel and Readiness.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 36 of such title is amended 

by inserting after the item relating to section 638a the following 

new item: 

‘‘638b. Voluntary retirement incentive.’’. 

(b) REINSTATEMENT OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY EARLY RETIREMENT AUTHORITY.— 

(1) REINSTATEMENT.—Subsection (i) of section 4403 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (10 

U.S.C. 1293 note) is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘the period’’; and 

(B) by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, and (2) the period beginning on the date of the 

enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 and ending on December 31, 2018’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
95 

(2) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.—Such section 

is further amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 

following new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS.— 

‘‘(1) INCREASED RETIRED PAY FOR PUBLIC OR COMMUNITY

SERVICE.—The provisions of section 4464 of this Act (10 U.S.C. 

1143a note) shall not apply with respect to a member or former 

member retired by reason of eligibility under this section during 

the active force drawdown period specified in subsection (i)(2). 

‘‘(2) COAST GUARD AND NOAA.—During the period specified 

in subsection (i)(2), this section does not apply as follows: 

‘‘(A) To members of the Coast Guard, notwithstanding 

section 542(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 1995 (10 U.S.C. 1293 note). 

‘‘(B) To members of the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, notwithstanding section 566(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 104–106; 10 

U.S.C. 1293 note).’’. 

(3) COORDINATION WITH OTHER SEPARATION PROVISIONS.— 

Such section is further amended— 

(A) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘, 1174a, or 1175’’ and 

inserting ‘‘or 1175a’’; and 

(B) in subsection (h)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘SSB OR

VSI’’ and inserting ‘‘SSB, VSI, OR VSP’’; 

(ii) by inserting before the period at the end of the 

first sentence the following: ‘‘or who before the date of 

the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 was separated from active 

duty pursuant to an agreement entered into under section 1175a of such title’’; and 

(iii) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘under section 1174a or 1175 of title 10, United States Code’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

SEC. 511. LEADERSHIP OF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU. 

(a) CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.— 

(1) GRADE AND EXCLUSION FROM GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH.—Subsection (d) of section 10502 of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(d) GRADE AND EXCLUSION FROM GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER

AUTHORIZED STRENGTH.—(1) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall be appointed to serve in the grade of general. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall designate, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 526 of this title, the position of Chief of the National Guard Bureau as one of the general officer and flag officer 

positions to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) of 

such section.’’. 

(2) SUCCESSION.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended 

to read as follows: 

‘‘(e) SUCCESSION.—(1) When there is a vacancy in the office of 

the Chief of the National Guard Bureau or in the absence or disability of the Chief, the Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
96 

acts as Chief and performs the duties of the Chief until a successor 

is appointed or the absence or disability ceases. 

‘‘(2) When there is a vacancy in the offices of both the Chief and 

the Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau or in the absence or 

disability of both the Chief and the Vice Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau, or when there is a vacancy in one such office and 

in the absence or disability of the officer holding the other, the senior officer of the Army National Guard of the United States or the 

Air National Guard of the United States on duty with the National 

Guard Bureau shall perform the duties of the Chief until a successor to the Chief or Vice Chief is appointed or the absence or disability of the Chief or Vice Chief ceases, as the case may be.’’. 

(3) EXCLUSION FOR CHIEF OF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

FROM GENERAL OFFICER DISTRIBUTION LIMITATIONS.—Section 

525 of such title is amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking subparagraph (D); 

and 

(B) in subsection (g)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 

(2). 

(b) VICE CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.— 

(1) REDESIGNATION OF DIRECTOR OF THE JOINT STAFF OF

THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 

10505 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘Director of the Joint 

Staff of the National Guard Bureau, selected by the Secretary 

of Defense from’’ and inserting ‘‘Vice Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau, appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The appointment shall be made 

from’’. 

(2) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Subsection (a)(1) of such 

section is further amended— 

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 

subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; 

(B) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘colonel’’ and inserting ‘‘brigadier general’’; and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following 

new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(B) are recommended by the Secretary of the Army, in the 

case of officers of the Army National Guard of the United 

States, or by the Secretary of the Air Force, in the case of officers of the Air National Guard of the United States, and by the 

Secretary of Defense; 

‘‘(C) are determined by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 

Staff, in accordance with criteria and as a result of a process 

established by the Chairman, to have significant joint duty experience;’’. 

(3) GRADE AND EXCLUSION FROM GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER AUTHORIZED STRENGTH.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c) GRADE AND EXCLUSION FROM GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER

AUTHORIZED STRENGTH.—(1) The Vice Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau shall be appointed to serve in the grade of lieutenant general. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
97 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall designate, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 526 of this title, the position of Vice Chief of 

the National Guard Bureau as one of the general officer and flag 

officer positions to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) 

of such section.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS REGARDING REFERENCES TO DIRECTOR.— 

(1) CROSS REFERENCES IN SECTION 10505.—Section 10505 of 

such title is further amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), by striking ‘‘Director of the Joint Staff’’ each place in appears and inserting ‘‘Vice Chief’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘as the Director’’ and inserting ‘‘as the Vice Chief’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Director of the Joint 

Staff’’ and inserting ‘‘Vice Chief’’. 

(2) CROSS REFERENCES IN SECTION 10506.—Section 

10506(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau and the Director of the Joint Staff’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Chief and Vice Chief’’. 

(3) OTHER REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 

the Director of the Joint Staff of the National Guard Bureau 

shall be deemed to be a reference to the Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau. 

(d) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading for section 10505 of 

such title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 10505. Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section 

in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1011 of such 

title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘10505. Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau.’’. 

(e) TREATMENT OF CURRENT DIRECTOR OF THE JOINT STAFF OF

THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—The officer who is serving as Director of the Joint Staff of the National Guard Bureau on the date 

of the enactment of this Act shall serve, in the grade of major general, as acting Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau until the 

appointment of a Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau in accordance with subsection (a) of section 10505 of title 10, United 

States Code, as amended by subsection (b). Notwithstanding the 

amendment made by subsection (b)(3), the acting Vice Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau shall not be excluded from the limitations 

in section 526(a) of such title. 

SEC. 512. MEMBERSHIP OF THE CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU ON THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF. 

(a) MEMBERSHIP ON JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.—Section 151(a) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

following new paragraph: 

‘‘(7) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau.’’. 

(b) DUTIES AS MEMBER OF JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.—Section 

10502 of such title is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
98 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e), as amended by 

section 511(a), as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): 

‘‘(d) MEMBER OF JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.—As a member of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau has 

the specific responsibility of addressing matters involving non-Federalized National Guard forces in support of homeland defense and 

civil support missions.’’. 

SEC. 513. MODIFICATION OF TIME IN WHICH PRESEPARATION COUNSELING MUST BE PROVIDED TO RESERVE COMPONENT 

MEMBERS BEING DEMOBILIZED. 

Section 1142(a)(3)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or in the event a member of a reserve component 

is being demobilized under circumstances in which (as determined 

by the Secretary concerned) operational requirements make the 90- 

day requirement under subparagraph (A) unfeasible,’’ after ‘‘or separation date,’’. 

SEC. 514. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABILITY OF AUTHORITY FOR DEFERRAL OF MANDATORY SEPARATION OF MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS) UNTIL AGE 60. 

(a) DISCRETIONARY DEFERRAL OF MANDATORY SEPARATION.— 

Section 10216(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘AUTHORITY

FOR’’ before ‘‘DEFERRAL OF MANDATORY SEPARATION’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘shall implement’’ and inserting ‘‘may each 

implement’’; 

(3) by inserting ‘‘, at the discretion of the Secretary concerned,’’ after ‘‘so as to allow’’; and 

(4) by striking ‘‘for officers’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 10218(a)(3)(A)(i) of 

such title is amended by striking ‘‘if qualified be appointed’’ and inserting ‘‘if qualified may be appointed’’. 

SEC. 515. AUTHORITY TO ORDER ARMY RESERVE, NAVY RESERVE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE, AND AIR FORCE RESERVE TO ACTIVE DUTY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN RESPONSE TO A 

MAJOR DISASTER OR EMERGENCY. 

(a) AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 12304 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 12304a. Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to 

provide assistance in response to a major disaster 

or emergency 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—When a Governor requests Federal assistance 

in responding to a major disaster or emergency (as those terms are 

defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), the Secretary of Defense may, without the consent of the member affected, order any 

unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as 

a unit, of the Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, 

and Air Force Reserve to active duty for a continuous period of not 

more than 120 days to respond to the Governor’s request. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
99 

‘‘(b) EXCLUSION FROM STRENGTH LIMITATIONS.—Members ordered to active duty under this section shall not be counted in computing authorized strength of members on active duty or members 

in grade under this title or any other law. 

‘‘(c) TERMINATION OF DUTY.—Whenever any unit or member of 

the reserve components is ordered to active duty under this section, 

the service of all units or members so ordered to active duty may 

be terminated by order of the Secretary of Defense or law.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1209 of such title is amended by inserting 

after the item relating to section 12304 the following new item: 

‘‘12304a. Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air Force Reserve: 

order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster 

or emergency.’’. 

(b) TREATMENT OF OPERATIONS AS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.—Section 101(a)(13)(B) of such title is amended by inserting 

‘‘12304a,’’ after ‘‘12304,’’. 

(c) USUAL AND CUSTOMARY ARRANGEMENT.— 

(1) DUAL-STATUS COMMANDER.—When the Armed Forces 

and the National Guard are employed simultaneously in support of civil authorities in the United States, appointment of a 

commissioned officer as a dual-status commander serving on 

active duty and duty in, or with, the National Guard of a State 

under sections 315 or 325 of title 32, United States Code, as 

commander of Federal forces by Federal authorities and as 

commander of State National Guard forces by State authorities, 

should be the usual and customary command and control arrangement, including for missions involving a major disaster or 

emergency as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

(42 U.S.C. 5122). The chain of command for the Armed Forces 

shall remain in accordance with sections 162(b) and 164(c) of 

title 10, United States Code. 

(2) STATE AUTHORITIES SUPPORTED.—When a major disaster or emergency occurs in any area subject to the laws of any 

State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, the Governor of the 

State affected normally should be the principal civil authority 

supported by the primary Federal agency and its supporting 

Federal entities, and the Adjutant General of the State or his 

or her subordinate designee normally should be the principal 

military authority supported by the dual-status commander 

when acting in his or her State capacity. 

(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in paragraphs (1) or 

(2) shall be construed to preclude or limit, in any way, the authorities of the President, the Secretary of Defense, or the Governor of any State to direct, control, and prescribe command 

and control arrangements for forces under their command. 

SEC. 516. AUTHORITY FOR ORDER TO ACTIVE DUTY OF UNITS OF THE 

SELECTED RESERVE FOR PREPLANNED MISSIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS. 

(a) AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1209 of title 10, United States 

Code, as amended by section 515, is further amended by inserting after section 12304a the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
100 

‘‘§ 12304b. Selected Reserve: order to active duty for 

preplanned missions in support of the combatant 

commands 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—When the Secretary of a military department 

determines that it is necessary to augment the active forces for a 

preplanned mission in support of a combatant command, the Secretary may, subject to subsection (b), order any unit of the Selected 

Reserve (as defined in section 10143(a) of this title), without the consent of the members, to active duty for not more than 365 consecutive days. 

‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) Units may be ordered to active duty 

under this section only if— 

‘‘(A) the manpower and associated costs of such active duty 

are specifically included and identified in the defense budget 

materials for the fiscal year or years in which such units are 

anticipated to be ordered to active duty; and 

‘‘(B) the budget information on such costs includes a description of the mission for which such units are anticipated to 

be ordered to active duty and the anticipated length of time of 

the order of such units to active duty on an involuntary basis. 

‘‘(2) Not more than 60,000 members of the reserve components 

of the armed forces may be on active duty under this section at any 

one time. 

‘‘(c) EXCLUSION FROM STRENGTH LIMITATIONS.—Members ordered to active duty under this section shall not be counted in computing authorized strength in members on active duty or total number of members in grade under this title or any other law. 

‘‘(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Whenever the Secretary of a military department orders any unit of the Selected Reserve to active 

duty under subsection (a), such Secretary shall submit to Congress 

a report, in writing, setting forth the circumstances necessitating the 

action taken under this section and describing the anticipated use 

of such unit. 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION OF DUTY.—Whenever any unit of the Selected 

Reserve is ordered to active duty under subsection (a), the service of 

all units so ordered to active duty may be terminated— 

‘‘(1) by order of the Secretary of the military department 

concerned; or 

‘‘(2) by law. 

‘‘(f) RELATIONSHIP TO WAR POWERS RESOLUTION.—Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as amending or limiting 

the application of the provisions of the War Powers Resolution (50 

U.S.C. 1541 et seq.). 

‘‘(g) CONSIDERATIONS FOR INVOLUNTARY ORDER TO ACTIVE

DUTY.—In determining which units of the Selected Reserve will be 

ordered to duty without their consent under this section, appropriate 

consideration shall be given to— 

‘‘(1) the length and nature of previous service, to assure 

such sharing of exposure to hazards as national security and 

military requirements will reasonably allow; 

‘‘(2) the frequency of assignments during service career; 

‘‘(3) family responsibilities; and 

‘‘(4) employment necessary to maintain the national health, 

safety, or interest. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
101 

‘‘(h) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall prescribe policies and procedures to carry 

out this section, including on determinations with respect to orders 

to active duty under subsection (g). Such policies and procedures 

shall not go into effect until approved by the Secretary of Defense. 

‘‘(i) DEFENSE BUDGET MATERIALS DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘defense budget materials’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 231(g)(2) of this title.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1209 of such title, as so amended, is further 

amended by inserting after the item relating to section 12304a 

the following new item: 

‘‘12304b. Selected Reserve: order to active duty for preplanned missions in support 

of the combatant commands.’’. 

(b) CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS RELATING TO AUTHORITY TO

ORDER TO ACTIVE DUTY OTHER THAN DURING WAR OR NATIONAL

EMERGENCY.—Section 12304(a) of such title is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘named’’ before ‘‘operational mission’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘365 days’’ and inserting ‘‘365 consecutive 

days’’. 

SEC. 517. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR CONSIDERATION FOR 

PROMOTION FOR RESERVE OFFICERS EMPLOYED AS MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS). 

Section 14301 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(i) RESERVE OFFICERS EMPLOYED AS MILITARY TECHNICIAN

(DUAL STATUS).—A reserve officer of the Army or Air Force employed as a military technician (dual status) under section 10216 of 

this title who has been retained beyond the mandatory removal date 

for years of service pursuant to subsection (f) of such section or section 14702(a)(2) of this title is not eligible for consideration for promotion by a mandatory promotion board convened under section 

14101(a) of this title.’’. 

SEC. 518. CONSIDERATION OF RESERVE COMPONENT OFFICERS FOR 

APPOINTMENT TO CERTAIN COMMAND POSITIONS. 

Whenever officers of the Armed Forces are considered for appointment to the position of Commander, Army North Command or 

Commander, Air Force North Command, fully qualified officers of 

the National Guard and the Reserves shall be considered for appointment to such position. 

SEC. 519. REPORT ON TERMINATION OF MILITARY TECHNICIAN AS A 

DISTINCT PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CATEGORY. 

(a) INDEPENDENT STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall conduct an independent study of the feasibility and advisability of terminating the military technician as a distinct personnel 

management category of the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—In conducting the study required by subsection 

(a), the Secretary shall— 

(1) identify various options for deploying units of the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve that otherwise use military 

technicians through use of a combination of active duty personnel, reserve component personnel, State civilian employees, 

and Federal civilian employees in a manner that meets mission 

requirements without harming unit readiness; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
102 

(2) identify various means for the management by the Department of the transition of military technicians to a system 

that relies on traditional personnel categories of active duty personnel, reserve component personnel, and civilian personnel, 

and for the management of any effects of that transition on the 

pay and benefits of current military technicians (including 

means for mitigating or avoiding such effects in the course of 

such transition); 

(3) determine whether military technicians who are employed at the commencement of the transition described in paragraph (2) should remain as technicians, whether with or without a military status, until separation or retirement, rather 

than transitioned to such a traditional personnel category; 

(4) identify and take into account the unique needs of the 

National Guard in the management and use of military technicians; 

(5) determine potential cost savings, if any, to be achieved 

as a result of the transition described in paragraph (2), including savings in long-term mandatory entitlement costs associated 

with military and civil service retirement obligations; 

(6) develop a recommendation on the feasibility and advisability of terminating the military technician as a distinct personnel management category, and, if the termination is determined to be feasible and advisable, develop recommendations 

for appropriate legislative and administrative action to implement the termination; 

(7) address any other matter relating to the management 

and long-term viability of the military technician as a distinct 

personnel management category that the Secretary shall specify 

for purposes of the study; and 

(8) ensure the involvement and input of military technicians (dual status). 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study required by subsection (a). 

The report shall set forth the results of the study, including the matters specified in subsection (b), and include such comments and recommendations on the results of the study as the Secretary considers 

appropriate. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

SEC. 521. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE UNIQUE NATURE, DEMANDS, 

AND HARDSHIPS OF MILITARY SERVICE. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) section 8 (clauses 12, 13, and 14) of Article I of the Constitution of the United States commits exclusively to Congress 

the powers to raise and support armies, provide and maintain 

a Navy, and make rules for the government and regulation of 

the land and naval forces; 

(2) there is no constitutional right to serve in the Armed 

Forces; 

(3) pursuant to the powers conferred by section 8 of article 

I of the Constitution of the United States, it lies within the discretion of the Congress to establish qualifications for and conditions of service in the Armed Forces; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
103 

(4) the primary purpose of the Armed Forces is to prepare 

for and to prevail in combat should the need arise; 

(5) the conduct of military operations requires members of 

the Armed Forces to make extraordinary sacrifices, including 

the ultimate sacrifice, in order to provide for the common defense; 

(6) success in combat requires military units that are characterized by high morale, good order and discipline, and unit 

cohesion; 

(7) one of the most critical elements in combat capability is 

unit cohesion, that is, the bonds of trust among individual 

members of the Armed Forces that make the combat effectiveness of a military unit greater than the sum of the combat effectiveness of individual unit members; 

(8) military life is fundamentally different from civilian life 

in that— 

(A) the extraordinary responsibilities of the Armed 

Forces, the unique conditions of military service, and the 

critical role of unit cohesion require that the military community, while subject to civilian control, exist as a specialized society; and 

(B) the military society is characterized by its own 

laws, rules, customs, and traditions, including numerous 

restrictions on personal behavior, that would not be acceptable in civilian society; 

(9) the standards of conduct for members of the Armed 

Forces regulate a member’s life for 24 hours each day beginning 

at the moment the member enters military status and not ending until that person is discharged or otherwise separated from 

the Armed Forces; 

(10) those standards of conduct, including the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, apply to a member of the Armed 

Forces at all times that the member has a military status, 

whether the member is on base or off base, and whether the 

member is on duty or off duty; 

(11) the pervasive application of the standards of conduct 

is necessary because members of the Armed Forces must be 

ready at all times for worldwide deployment to a combat environment; 

(12) the worldwide deployment of United States military 

forces, the international responsibilities of the United States, 

and the potential for involvement of the Armed Forces in actual 

combat routinely make it necessary for members of the Armed 

Forces involuntarily to accept living conditions and working 

conditions that are often spartan, primitive, and characterized 

by forced intimacy with little or no privacy; and 

(13) the Armed Forces must maintain personnel policies 

that are intended to recruit and retain only those persons whose 

presence in the Armed Forces serves the needs of the Armed 

Forces, contributes to the accomplishment of the missions of the 

Armed Forces, and maintains the high standards of the Armed 

Forces for morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion 

that are the essence of military capability. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
104 

SEC. 522. POLICY ADDRESSING DWELL TIME AND MEASUREMENT AND 

DATA COLLECTION REGARDING UNIT OPERATING TEMPO 

AND PERSONNEL TEMPO. 

(a) POLICY ADDRESSING DWELL TIME.—Subsection (a) of section 

991 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy that addresses the amount of dwell time a member of the armed forces or 

unit remains at the member’s or unit’s permanent duty station or 

home port, as the case may be, between deployments.’’. 

(b) UNIT OPERATING TEMPO AND PERSONNEL TEMPO RECORD- KEEPING.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c) RECORDKEEPING.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall— 

‘‘(A) establish a system for tracking and recording the number of days that each member of the armed forces is deployed; 

‘‘(B) prescribe policies and procedures for measuring operating tempo and personnel tempo; and 

‘‘(C) maintain a central data collection repository to provide 

information for research, actuarial analysis, interagency reporting, and evaluation of Department of Defense programs and 

policies. 

‘‘(2) The data collection repository shall be able to identify— 

‘‘(A) the active and reserve component units of the armed 

forces that are participating at the battalion, squadron, or an 

equivalent level (or a higher level) in contingency operations, 

major training events, and other exercises and contingencies of 

such a scale that the exercises and contingencies receive an official designation; and 

‘‘(B) the duration of their participation. 

‘‘(3) For each of the armed forces, the data collection repository 

shall be able to indicate, for a fiscal year— 

‘‘(A) the number of members who received the high-deployment allowance under section 436 of title 37 (or who would 

have been eligible to receive the allowance if the duty assignment was not excluded by the Secretary of Defense); 

‘‘(B) the number of members who received each rate of allowance paid (estimated in the case of members described in the 

parenthetical phrase in subparagraph (A)); 

‘‘(C) the number of months each member received the allowance (or would have received it in the case of members described in the parenthetical phrase in subparagraph (A)); and 

‘‘(D) the total amount expended on the allowance. 

‘‘(4) For each of the armed forces, the data collection repository 

shall be able to indicate, for a fiscal year, the number of days that 

high demand, low density units (as defined by the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff) were deployed, and whether these units met 

the force goals for limiting deployments, as described in the personnel tempo policies applicable to that armed force.’’. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—Such section is further amended by adding 

at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) OTHER DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the term ‘dwell time’ 

means the time a member of the armed forces or a unit spends 

at the permanent duty station or home port after returning from 

a deployment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
105 

‘‘(B) The Secretary of Defense may modify the definition of 

dwell time specified in subparagraph (A). If the Secretary establishes a different definition of such term, the Secretary shall 

transmit the new definition to Congress. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘operating tempo’ means the rate at which 

units of the armed forces are involved in all military activities, 

including contingency operations, exercises, and training deployments. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘personnel tempo’ means the amount of time 

members of the armed forces are engaged in their official duties 

at a location or under circumstances that make it infeasible for 

a member to spend off-duty time in the housing in which the 

member resides.’’. 

(d) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of section 991 of such 

title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 991. Management of deployments of members and measurement and data collection of unit operating and personnel tempo’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 50 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 991 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘991. Management of deployments of members and measurement and data collection 

of unit operating and personnel tempo.’’. 

SEC. 523. PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES AND PROHIBITION OF RETALIATORY PERSONNEL 

ACTIONS. 

Section 1034(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(C) A threat by another member of the armed forces or 

employee of the Federal Government that indicates a determination or intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury to 

members of the armed forces or civilians or damage to military, Federal, or civilian property.’’. 

SEC. 524. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DETERMINATION MADE 

IN RESPONSE TO REVIEW OF PROPOSAL FOR AWARD OF 

MEDAL OF HONOR NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IN TIMELY FASHION. 

Section 1130(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘If the determination 

includes a favorable recommendation for the award of the Medal of 

Honor, the Secretary of Defense, instead of the Secretary concerned, 

shall make the submission under this subsection.’’. 

SEC. 525. EXPANSION OF REGULAR ENLISTED MEMBERS COVERED BY 

EARLY DISCHARGE AUTHORITY. 

Section 1171 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘within three months’’ and inserting ‘‘within one year’’. 

SEC. 526. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY AND BENEFITS 

AUTHORITY. 

Section 1175a(k)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
106 

SEC. 527. PROHIBITION ON DENIAL OF REENLISTMENT OF MEMBERS 

FOR UNSUITABILITY BASED ON THE SAME MEDICAL CONDITION FOR WHICH THEY WERE DETERMINED TO BE FIT 

FOR DUTY. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—Subsection (a) of section 1214a of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, or deny reenlistment 

of the member,’’ after ‘‘a member described in subsection (b)’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(3) of such section 

is amended by inserting ‘‘or denial of reenlistment’’ after ‘‘to warrant administrative separation’’. 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical Evaluation Board: prohibition on involuntary administrative separation or denial of reenlistment due to 

unsuitability based on medical conditions considered in evaluation’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 61 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 1214a and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical Evaluation Board: prohibition 

on involuntary administrative separation or denial of reenlistment due 

to unsuitability based on medical conditions considered in evaluation.’’. 

SEC. 528. DESIGNATION OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO DIRECT DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

Section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘Only the’’ in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘The’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; 

(3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking 

‘‘clauses (1)–(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (1) through (4)’’; 

and 

(4) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, 

the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(1) The person identified by the decedent on the record of 

emergency data maintained by the Secretary concerned (DD 

Form 93 or any successor to that form), as the Person Authorized to Direct Disposition (PADD), regardless of the relationship 

of the designee to the decedent.’’. 

SEC. 529. MATTERS COVERED BY PRESEPARATION COUNSELING FOR 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THEIR SPOUSES. 

Section 1142(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘job placement counseling 

for the spouse’’ and inserting ‘‘inclusion of the spouse, at the 

discretion of the member and the spouse, when counseling regarding the matters covered by paragraphs (9), (10), and (16) 

is provided, job placement counseling for the spouse, and the 

provision of information on survivor benefits available under 

the laws administered by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
107 

(2) in paragraph (9), by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, including information on budgeting, saving, credit, 

loans, and taxes’’; 

(3) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘and employment’’ and 

inserting ‘‘, employment, and financial’’; 

(4) by striking paragraph (16) and inserting the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(16) Information on home loan services and housing assistance benefits available under the laws administered by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs and counseling on responsible borrowing practices.’’; and 

(5) in paragraph (17), by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, and information regarding the means by which the 

member can receive additional counseling regarding the member’s actual entitlement to such benefits and apply for such benefits’’. 

SEC. 530. CONVERSION OF HIGH-DEPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE FROM 

MANDATORY TO AUTHORIZED. 

(a) CONVERSION.—Section 436(a) of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘shall pay’’ and inserting ‘‘may pay’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 531. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT PROGRAMS ON CAREER FLEXIBILITY TO ENHANCE RETENTION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) DURATION OF PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—Subsection (l) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 701 note) is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(l) DURATION OF PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—No member of the 

Armed Forces may be released from active duty under a pilot program conducted under this section after December 31, 2015.’’. 

(b) CONTINUATION OF ANNUAL LIMITATION ON SELECTION OF

PARTICIPANTS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘each of calendar years 2009 through 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

calendar year’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL REPORTS REQUIRED.—Subsection (k) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘June 1, 2011, and June 

1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘June 1 of 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017’’; 

and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘March 1, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1, 2019’’. 

SEC. 532. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF 

GRADUATES OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 

(a) EQUAL TREATMENT FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADUATES.— 

(1) EQUAL TREATMENT.—For the purposes of recruitment 

and enlistment in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of a military 

department shall treat a graduate described in paragraph (2) 

in the same manner as a graduate of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)). 

(2) COVERED GRADUATES.—Paragraph (1) applies with respect to person who— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
108 

(A) receives a diploma from a secondary school that is 

legally operating; or 

(B) otherwise completes a program of secondary education in compliance with the education laws of the State 

in which the person resides. 

(b) POLICY ON RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT.—Not later than 

180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense shall prescribe a policy on recruitment and enlistment 

that incorporates the following: 

(1) Means for identifying persons described in subsection 

(a)(2) who are qualified for recruitment and enlistment in the 

Armed Forces, which may include the use of a non-cognitive aptitude test, adaptive personality assessment, or other operational attrition screening tool to predict performance, behaviors, and attitudes of potential recruits that influence attrition 

and the ability to adapt to a regimented life in the Armed 

Forces. 

(2) Means for assessing how qualified persons fulfill their 

enlistment obligation. 

(3) Means for maintaining data, by each diploma source, 

which can be used to analyze attrition rates among qualified 

persons. 

(c) RECRUITMENT PLAN.—As part of the policy required by subsection (b), the Secretary of each of the military departments shall 

develop a recruitment plan that includes a marketing strategy for 

targeting various segments of potential recruits with all types of secondary education credentials. 

(d) COMMUNICATION PLAN.—The Secretary of each of the military departments shall develop a communication plan to ensure that 

the policy and recruitment plan are understood by military recruiters. 

SEC. 533. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUICIDE PREVENTION PROGRAM. 

(a) PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

take appropriate actions to enhance the suicide prevention program 

of the Department of Defense through the provision of suicide prevention information and resources to members of the Armed Forces 

from their initial enlistment or appointment through their final retirement or separation. 

(b) COOPERATIVE EFFORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop suicide prevention information and resources in consultation 

with— 

(1) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the National Institute 

of Mental Health, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration of the Department of Health and 

Human Services; and 

(2) to the extent appropriate, institutions of higher education and other public and private entities, including international entities, with expertise regarding suicide prevention. 

(c) PRESEPARATION COUNSELING REGARDING SUICIDE PREVENTION RESOURCES.—Section 1142(b)(8) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘and 

the availability to the member and dependents of suicide prevention 

resources following separation from the armed forces’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
109 

Subtitle D—Military Justice and Legal Matters 

SEC. 541. REFORM OF OFFENSES RELATING TO RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, AND OTHER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT UNDER THE 

UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT GENERALLY.—Section 920 of 

title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), is amended as follows: 

(1) REVISED OFFENSE OF RAPE.—Subsection (a) is amended 

to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) RAPE.—Any person subject to this chapter who commits a 

sexual act upon another person by— 

‘‘(1) using unlawful force against that other person; 

‘‘(2) using force causing or likely to cause death or grievous 

bodily harm to any person; 

‘‘(3) threatening or placing that other person in fear that 

any person will be subjected to death, grievous bodily harm, or 

kidnapping; 

‘‘(4) first rendering that other person unconscious; or 

‘‘(5) administering to that other person by force or threat of 

force, or without the knowledge or consent of that person, a 

drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance and thereby substantially impairing the ability of that other person to appraise 

or control conduct; 

is guilty of rape and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.’’. 

(2) REPEAL OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO OFFENSES RE- PLACED BY NEW ARTICLE 120b.—Subsections (b), (d), (f), (g), (i), 

(j), and (o) are repealed. 

(3) REVISED OFFENSE OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.—Subsection (c) 

is redesignated as subsection (b) and is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) SEXUAL ASSAULT.—Any person subject to this chapter 

who— 

‘‘(1) commits a sexual act upon another person by— 

‘‘(A) threatening or placing that other person in fear; 

‘‘(B) causing bodily harm to that other person; 

‘‘(C) making a fraudulent representation that the sexual act serves a professional purpose; or 

‘‘(D) inducing a belief by any artifice, pretense, or concealment that the person is another person; 

‘‘(2) commits a sexual act upon another person when the 

person knows or reasonably should know that the other person 

is asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unaware that the sexual act 

is occurring; or 

‘‘(3) commits a sexual act upon another person when the 

other person is incapable of consenting to the sexual act due 

to— 

‘‘(A) impairment by any drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance, and that condition is known or reasonably 

should be known by the person; or 

‘‘(B) a mental disease or defect, or physical disability, 

and that condition is known or reasonably should be 

known by the person; 

is guilty of sexual assault and shall be punished as a court-martial 

may direct.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
110 

(4) AGGRAVATED SEXUAL CONTACT.—Subsection (e) is redesignated as subsection (c) and is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘engages in’’ and inserting ‘‘commits’’; 

and 

(B) by striking ‘‘with’’ and inserting ‘‘upon’’. 

(5) ABUSIVE SEXUAL CONTACT.—Subsection (h) is redesignated as subsection (d) and is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘engages in’’ and inserting ‘‘commits’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘with’’ and inserting ‘‘upon’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘subsection (c) (aggravated sexual assault)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b) (sexual assault)’’. 

(6) REPEAL OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO OFFENSES REPLACED BY NEW ARTICLE 120c.—Subsections (k), (l), (m), and (n) 

are repealed. 

(7) PROOF OF THREAT.—Subsection (p) is redesignated as 

subsection (e) and is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the accused made’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

person made’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘the accused actually’’ and inserting 

‘‘the person actually’’; and 

(C) by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘or had the ability to carry out the threat’’. 

(8) DEFENSES.—Subsection (q) is redesignated as subsection (f) and is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(f) DEFENSES.—An accused may raise any applicable defenses 

available under this chapter or the Rules for Court-Martial. Marriage is not a defense for any conduct in issue in any prosecution 

under this section.’’. 

(9) PROVISIONS RELATING TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES.— 

Subsections (r) and (s) are repealed. 

(10) DEFINITIONS.—Subsection (t) is redesignated as subsection (g) and is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or anus or 

mouth’’ after ‘‘vulva’’; and 

(ii) in subparagraph (B)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘genital opening’’ and inserting 

‘‘vulva or anus or mouth,’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘a hand or finger’’ and inserting ‘‘any part of the body’’; 

(B) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(2) SEXUAL CONTACT.—The term ‘sexual contact’ means— 

‘‘(A) touching, or causing another person to touch, either directly or through the clothing, the genitalia, anus, 

groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person, with 

an intent to abuse, humiliate, or degrade any person; or 

‘‘(B) any touching, or causing another person to touch, 

either directly or through the clothing, any body part of any 

person, if done with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person. 

Touching may be accomplished by any part of the body.’’. 

(C) by striking paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
111 

(D) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (3), 

transferring that paragraph so as to appear after paragraph (2), and amending that paragraph by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, including any 

nonconsensual sexual act or nonconsensual sexual contact’’; 

(E) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(C), by striking the last sentence; 

(F) by striking paragraphs (5) and (7); 

(G) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); 

(H) by inserting after paragraph (4), as redesignated by 

subparagraph (C), the following new paragraphs (5) and 

(6): 

‘‘(5) FORCE.—The term ‘force’ means— 

‘‘(A) the use of a weapon; 

‘‘(B) the use of such physical strength or violence as is 

sufficient to overcome, restrain, or injure a person; or 

‘‘(C) inflicting physical harm sufficient to coerce or 

compel submission by the victim. 

‘‘(6) UNLAWFUL FORCE.—The term ‘unlawful force’ means 

an act of force done without legal justification or excuse.’’; 

(I) in paragraph (7), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(G)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘under paragraph (3)’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘contact),’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘death, grievous bodily harm, or 

kidnapping’’ and inserting ‘‘the wrongful action contemplated by the communication or action.’’; 

(J) by striking paragraphs (9) through (13); 

(K) by redesignating paragraph (14) as paragraph (8) 

and in that paragraph— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘The term’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘words or overt acts indicating’’ and 

‘‘sexual’’ in the first sentence; 

(iii) by striking ‘‘accused’s’’ in the third sentence; 

(iv) by inserting ‘‘or social or sexual’’ before ‘‘relationship’’ in the fourth sentence; 

(v) by striking ‘‘sexual’’ before ‘‘conduct’’ in the 

fourth sentence; 

(vi) by striking ‘‘A person cannot consent’’ and all 

that follows through the period; and 

(vii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(B) A sleeping, unconscious, or incompetent person 

cannot consent. A person cannot consent to force causing or 

likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm or to being 

rendered unconscious. A person cannot consent while under 

threat or in fear or under the circumstances described in 

subparagraph (C) or (D) of subsection (b)(1). 

‘‘(C) Lack of consent may be inferred based on the circumstances of the offense. All the surrounding circumstances are to be considered in determining whether a 

person gave consent, or whether a person did not resist or 

ceased to resist only because of another person’s actions.’’; 

and 

(L) by striking paragraphs (15) and (16). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
112 

(11) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section (article) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 920. Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally’’. 

(b) RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD.—Chapter 47 of 

such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting after section 920a (article 120a), as amended by subsection 

(a), the following new section (article): 

‘‘§ 920b. Art. 120b. Rape and sexual assault of a child 

‘‘(a) RAPE OF A CHILD.—Any person subject to this chapter 

who— 

‘‘(1) commits a sexual act upon a child who has not attained the age of 12 years; or 

‘‘(2) commits a sexual act upon a child who has attained 

the age of 12 years by— 

‘‘(A) using force against any person; 

‘‘(B) threatening or placing that child in fear; 

‘‘(C) rendering that child unconscious; or 

‘‘(D) administering to that child a drug, intoxicant, or 

other similar substance; 

is guilty of rape of a child and shall be punished as a court-martial 

may direct. 

‘‘(b) SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD.—Any person subject to this 

chapter who commits a sexual act upon a child who has attained 

the age of 12 years is guilty of sexual assault of a child and shall 

be punished as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(c) SEXUAL ABUSE OF A CHILD.—Any person subject to this 

chapter who commits a lewd act upon a child is guilty of sexual 

abuse of a child and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(d) AGE OF CHILD.— 

‘‘(1) UNDER 12 YEARS.—In a prosecution under this section, 

it need not be proven that the accused knew the age of the other 

person engaging in the sexual act or lewd act. It is not a defense 

that the accused reasonably believed that the child had attained 

the age of 12 years. 

‘‘(2) UNDER 16 YEARS.—In a prosecution under this section, 

it need not be proven that the accused knew that the other person engaging in the sexual act or lewd act had not attained the 

age of 16 years, but it is a defense in a prosecution under subsection (b) (sexual assault of a child) or subsection (c) (sexual 

abuse of a child), which the accused must prove by a preponderance of the evidence, that the accused reasonably believed that 

the child had attained the age of 16 years, if the child had in 

fact attained at least the age of 12 years. 

‘‘(e) PROOF OF THREAT.—In a prosecution under this section, in 

proving that a person made a threat, it need not be proven that the 

person actually intended to carry out the threat or had the ability 

to carry out the threat. 

‘‘(f) MARRIAGE.—In a prosecution under subsection (b) (sexual 

assault of a child) or subsection (c) (sexual abuse of a child), it is 

a defense, which the accused must prove by a preponderance of the 

evidence, that the persons engaging in the sexual act or lewd act 

were at that time married to each other, except where the accused 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
113 

commits a sexual act upon the person when the accused knows or 

reasonably should know that the other person is asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unaware that the sexual act is occurring or 

when the other person is incapable of consenting to the sexual act 

due to impairment by any drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance, and that condition was known or reasonably should have 

been known by the accused. 

‘‘(g) CONSENT.—Lack of consent is not an element and need not 

be proven in any prosecution under this section. A child not legally 

married to the person committing the sexual act, lewd act, or use 

of force cannot consent to any sexual act, lewd act, or use of force. 

‘‘(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) SEXUAL ACT AND SEXUAL CONTACT.—The terms ‘sexual 

act’ and ‘sexual contact’ have the meanings given those terms in 

section 920(g) of this title (article 120(g)). 

‘‘(2) FORCE.—The term ‘force’ means— 

‘‘(A) the use of a weapon; 

‘‘(B) the use of such physical strength or violence as is 

sufficient to overcome, restrain, or injure a child; or 

‘‘(C) inflicting physical harm. 

In the case of a parent-child or similar relationship, the use or 

abuse of parental or similar authority is sufficient to constitute 

the use of force. 

‘‘(3) THREATENING OR PLACING THAT CHILD IN FEAR.—The 

term ‘threatening or placing that child in fear’ means a communication or action that is of sufficient consequence to cause the 

child to fear that non-compliance will result in the child or another person being subjected to the action contemplated by the 

communication or action. 

‘‘(4) CHILD.—The term ‘child’ means any person who has 

not attained the age of 16 years. 

‘‘(5) LEWD ACT.—The term ‘lewd act’ means— 

‘‘(A) any sexual contact with a child; 

‘‘(B) intentionally exposing one’s genitalia, anus, buttocks, or female areola or nipple to a child by any means, 

including via any communication technology, with an intent to abuse, humiliate, or degrade any person, or to 

arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; 

‘‘(C) intentionally communicating indecent language to 

a child by any means, including via any communication 

technology, with an intent to abuse, humiliate, or degrade 

any person, or to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any 

person; or 

‘‘(D) any indecent conduct, intentionally done with or 

in the presence of a child, including via any communication technology, that amounts to a form of immorality relating to sexual impurity which is grossly vulgar, obscene, 

and repugnant to common propriety, and tends to excite 

sexual desire or deprave morals with respect to sexual relations.’’. 

(c) OTHER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.—Such chapter (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice) is further amended by inserting after section 920b (article 120b), as added by subsection (b), the following 

new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
114 

‘‘§ 920c. Art. 120c. Other sexual misconduct 

‘‘(a) INDECENT VIEWING, VISUAL RECORDING, OR BROAD- CASTING.—Any person subject to this chapter who, without legal justification or lawful authorization— 

‘‘(1) knowingly and wrongfully views the private area of another person, without that other person’s consent and under circumstances in which that other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; 

‘‘(2) knowingly photographs, videotapes, films, or records by 

any means the private area of another person, without that 

other person’s consent and under circumstances in which that 

other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; or 

‘‘(3) knowingly broadcasts or distributes any such recording 

that the person knew or reasonably should have known was 

made under the circumstances proscribed in paragraphs (1) 

and (2); 

is guilty of an offense under this section and shall be punished as 

a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(b) FORCIBLE PANDERING.—Any person subject to this chapter 

who compels another person to engage in an act of prostitution with 

any person is guilty of forcible pandering and shall be punished as 

a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(c) INDECENT EXPOSURE.—Any person subject to this chapter 

who intentionally exposes, in an indecent manner, the genitalia, 

anus, buttocks, or female areola or nipple is guilty of indecent exposure and shall by punished as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) ACT OF PROSTITUTION.—The term ‘act of prostitution’ 

means a sexual act or sexual contact (as defined in section 

920(g) of this title (article 120(g))) on account of which anything 

of value is given to, or received by, any person. 

‘‘(2) PRIVATE AREA.—The term ‘private area’ means the 

naked or underwear-clad genitalia, anus, buttocks, or female 

areola or nipple. 

‘‘(3) REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY.—The term 

‘under circumstances in which that other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy’ means— 

‘‘(A) circumstances in which a reasonable person would 

believe that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without 

being concerned that an image of a private area of the person was being captured; or 

‘‘(B) circumstances in which a reasonable person would 

believe that a private area of the person would not be visible to the public. 

‘‘(4) BROADCAST.—The term ‘broadcast’ means to electronically transmit a visual image with the intent that it be viewed 

by a person or persons. 

‘‘(5) DISTRIBUTE.—The term ‘distribute’ means delivering to 

the actual or constructive possession of another, including 

transmission by electronic means. 

‘‘(6) INDECENT MANNER.—The term ‘indecent manner’ 

means conduct that amounts to a form of immorality relating 

to sexual impurity which is grossly vulgar, obscene, and repugnant to common propriety, and tends to excite sexual desire or 

deprave morals with respect to sexual relations.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
115 

(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 47 of such title (the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice) is further amended as follows: 

(1) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

843(b)(2) (article 43(b)(2)) is amended— 

(A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘section 920 of this title 

(article 120)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 920, 920a, 920b, or 

920c of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, or 120c)’’; and 

(B) in clause (v)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘indecent assault’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘or liberties with a child’’. 

(2) MURDER.—Paragraph (4) of section 918 (article 118) is 

amended by striking ‘‘aggravated sexual assault,’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘with a child,’’ and inserting ‘‘sexual assault, 

sexual assault of a child, aggravated sexual contact, sexual 

abuse of a child,’’. 

(e) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter X of such chapter (the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice) is amended by striking the items relating to sections 920 

and 920a (articles 120 and 120a) and inserting the following new 

items: 

‘‘920. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally. 

‘‘920a. 120a. Stalking. 

‘‘920b. 120b. Rape and sexual assault of a child. 

‘‘920c. 120c. Other sexual misconduct.’’. 

(f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 

and shall apply with respect to offenses committed on or after such 

effective date. 

SEC. 542. AUTHORITY TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTARY 

EVIDENCE. 

(a) EFFECT OF REFUSAL TO APPEAR OR TESTIFY.—Section 847 

of title 10, United States Code (article 47 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘board;’’ and inserting 

‘‘board, or has been duly issued a subpoena duces tecum for 

an investigation pursuant to section 832(b) of this title (article 32(b));’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘duly paid or tendered the fees and 

mileage of a witness’’ and inserting ‘‘provided a means 

for reimbursement from the Government for fees and 

mileage’’; and 

(ii) by inserting before the semicolon the following: 

‘‘or, in the case of extraordinary hardship, is advanced 

such fees and mileage’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘or board’’ and inserting 

‘‘board, or convening authority’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (a) of such section is 

further amended by striking ‘‘subpenaed’’ both places it appears and 

inserting ‘‘subpoenaed’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to subpoenas issued after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
116 

SEC. 543. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION AND EXTENT OF DIRECT 

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AUTHORITY. 

Section 2601a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (1); 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 

and 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(2) in an operation or area designated as a combat operation or a combat zone, respectively, by the Secretary of Defense 

in accordance with the regulations prescribed under subsection 

(a); or’’; 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2) of 

subsection (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of subsection (b)’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN REGULATIONS.—To the extent provided in the regulations issued under subsection (a) to implement 

subsection (b)(2), the regulations shall apply to the acceptance of 

gifts received after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 for injuries or illnesses incurred on or after September 11, 2001.’’. 

SEC. 544. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE OF MILITARY CHAPLAINS WITH 

RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE OF MARRIAGES. 

A military chaplain who, as a matter of conscience or moral 

principle, does not wish to perform a marriage may not be required 

to do so. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training Opportunities 

and Administration 

SEC. 551. EMPLOYMENT SKILLS TRAINING FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES ON ACTIVE DUTY WHO ARE 

TRANSITIONING TO CIVILIAN LIFE. 

Section 1143 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) EMPLOYMENT SKILLS TRAINING.—(1) The Secretary of a 

military department may carry out one or more programs to provide 

eligible members of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of the 

Secretary with job training and employment skills training, including apprenticeship programs, to help prepare such members for employment in the civilian sector. 

‘‘(2) A member of the armed forces is an eligible member for 

purposes of a program under this subsection if the member— 

‘‘(A) has completed at least 180 days on active duty in the 

armed forces; and 

‘‘(B) is expected to be discharged or released from active 

duty in the armed forces within 180 days of the date of commencement of participation in such a program. 

‘‘(3) Any program under this subsection shall be carried out in 

accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
117 

SEC. 552. ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES ON JOINT PROFESSIONAL 

MILITARY EDUCATION. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO CREDIT MILITARY GRADUATES OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE COLLEGE WITH COMPLETION OF

JPME PHASE I.— 

(1) JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION PHASE I.— 

Section 2154(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting ‘‘or at a joint intermediate level school’’ before the 

period at the end. 

(2) JOINT INTERMEDIATE LEVEL SCHOOL DEFINED.—Section 

2151(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The term ‘joint intermediate level school’ includes the 

National Defense Intelligence College.’’. 

(b) PILOT PROGRAM ON JPME PHASE II ON OTHER-THAN-IN

RESIDENCE BASIS.— 

(1) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense 

may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of offering a program of instruction for Phase II joint 

professional military education (JPME II) on an other than inresidence basis. 

(2) LOCATION.—The pilot program authorized by this subsection shall be carried out at the headquarters of not more 

than two combatant commands selected by the Secretary for 

purposes of the pilot program. 

(3) PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION.—The program of instruction 

offered under the pilot program authorized by this subsection 

shall meet the requirements of section 2155 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

(4) REPORT.—Not later than one year before completion of 

the pilot program authorized by this subsection, the Secretary 

shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program. 

The report shall include the following: 

(A) The number of students enrolled at each location 

under the pilot program. 

(B) The number of students who successfully completed 

the program of instruction under the pilot program and 

were awarded credit for Phase II joint professional military 

education. 

(C) The assessment of the Secretary regarding the feasibility and advisability of expanding the pilot program to 

the headquarters of additional combatant commands, or of 

making the pilot program permanent, and a statement of 

the legislative or administrative actions required to implement such assessment. 

(5) SUNSET.—The authority in this subsection to carry out 

the pilot program shall expire on the date that is five years after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 553. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO WAIVE MAXIMUM AGE LIMITATION ON ADMISSION TO THE MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMIES. 

(a) WAIVER FOR CERTAIN ENLISTED MEMBERS.—The Secretary 

of the military department concerned may waive the maximum age 

limitation specified in section 4346(a), 6958(a)(1), or 9346(a) of title 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
118 

10, United States Code, for the admission of an enlisted member of 

the Armed Forces to the United States Military Academy, the 

United States Naval Academy, or the United States Air Force Academy if the member— 

(1) satisfies the eligibility requirements for admission to 

that academy (other than the maximum age limitation); and 

(2) was or is prevented from being admitted to a military 

service academy before the member reached the maximum age 

specified in such sections as a result of service on active duty 

in a theater of operations for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or Operation New Dawn. 

(b) MAXIMUM AGE FOR RECEIPT OF WAIVER.—A waiver may not 

be granted under this section if the candidate would pass the candidate’s twenty-sixth birthday by July 1 of the year in which the 

candidate would enter the military service academy pursuant to the 

waiver. 

(c) LIMITATION ON NUMBER ADMITTED USING WAIVER.—Not 

more than five candidates may be admitted to each of the military 

service academies for an academic year pursuant to a waiver granted under this section. 

(d) RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of each 

military department shall maintain records on the number of graduates of the military service academy under the jurisdiction of the 

Secretary who are admitted pursuant to a waiver granted under 

this section and who remain in the Armed Forces beyond the active 

duty service obligation assumed upon graduation. The Secretary 

shall compare their retention rate to the retention rate of graduates 

of that academy generally. 

(e) REPORTS.—Not later than April 1, 2016, the Secretary of 

each military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 

specifying— 

(1) the number of applications for waivers received by the 

Secretary under this section; 

(2) the number of waivers granted by the Secretary under 

this section; 

(3) the number of candidates actually admitted to the military service academy under the jurisdiction of the Secretary 

pursuant to a waiver granted by the Secretary under this section; and 

(4) beginning with the class of 2009, the number of graduates of the military service academy under the jurisdiction of 

the Secretary who, before admission to that academy, were enlisted members of the Armed Forces and who remain in the 

Armed Forces beyond the active duty service obligation assumed 

upon graduation. 

(f) DURATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The authority to grant a 

waiver under this section expires on September 30, 2016. 

SEC. 554. ENHANCEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED 

STATES AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 901 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 9314a the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
119 

‘‘§ 9314b. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: administration 

‘‘(a) COMMANDANT.— 

‘‘(1) SELECTION.—The Commandant of the United States 

Air Force Institute of Technology shall be selected by the Secretary of the Air Force. 

‘‘(2) ELIGIBILITY.—The Commandant shall be one of the following: 

‘‘(A) An officer of the Air Force on active duty in a 

grade not below the grade of colonel who possesses such 

qualifications as the Secretary considers appropriate and is 

assigned or detailed to such position. 

‘‘(B) A member of the Senior Executive Service or a civilian individual, including an individual who was retired 

from the Air Force in a grade not below brigadier general, 

who has the qualifications appropriate for the position of 

Commandant and is selected by the Secretary as the best 

qualified from among candidates for the position in accordance with a process and criteria determined by the Secretary. 

‘‘(3) TERM FOR CIVILIAN COMMANDANT.—An individual selected for the position of Commandant under paragraph (2)(B) 

shall serve in that position for a term of not more than five 

years and may be continued in that position for an additional 

term of up to five years. 

‘‘(b) PROVOST AND ACADEMIC DEAN.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established at the United States 

Air Force Institute of Technology the civilian position of Provost 

and Academic Dean who shall be appointed by the Secretary. 

‘‘(2) TERM.—An individual appointed to the position of Provost and Academic Dean shall serve in that position for a term 

of five years. 

‘‘(3) COMPENSATION.—The individual serving as Provost 

and Academic Dean is entitled to such compensation for such 

service as the Secretary shall prescribe for purposes of this section, but not more than the rate of compensation authorized for 

level IV of the Executive Schedule.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 901 of such title is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 9314a the following new item: 

‘‘9314b. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: administration.’’. 

SEC. 555. ENROLLMENT OF CERTAIN SERIOUSLY WOUNDED, ILL, OR 

INJURED FORMER OR RETIRED ENLISTED MEMBERS OF 

THE ARMED FORCES IN ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS 

OF THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE IN 

ORDER TO COMPLETE DEGREE PROGRAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9315 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) SERIOUSLY WOUNDED, ILL, OR INJURED FORMER AND RE- TIRED ENLISTED MEMBERS.—(1) The Secretary of the Air Force may 

authorize participation in a program of higher education under subVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
120 

section (a)(1) by a person who is a former or retired enlisted member 

of the armed forces who at the time of the person’s separation from 

active duty— 

‘‘(A) had commenced but had not completed a program of 

higher education under subsection (a)(1); and 

‘‘(B) is categorized by the Secretary concerned as seriously 

wounded, ill, or injured. 

‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, a person who may be categorized as seriously wounded, ill, or injured is a person with a serious injury or illness (as that term is defined in section 1602(8) of 

the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 

U.S.C. 1071 note)). 

‘‘(3) A person may not be authorized under paragraph (1) to 

participate in a program of higher education after the end of the 10- 

year period beginning on the date of the person’s separation from 

active duty. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary may not pay the tuition for participation in 

a program of higher education under subsection (a)(1) of a person 

participating in such program pursuant to an authorization under 

paragraph (1).’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (d) of such section, 

as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended by striking ‘‘enlisted member’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘person’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (c) of section 9315 of title 10, 

United States Code (as added by subsection (a)(2)), shall apply to 

persons covered by paragraph (1) of such subsection who are categorized by the Secretary concerned as seriously wounded, ill, or injured after September 11, 2001. With respect to any such person 

who is separated from active duty during the period beginning on 

September 12, 2001, and ending on the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the 10-year period specified in paragraph (3) of such subsection 

shall be deemed to commence on the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

SEC. 556. RESERVE COMPONENT MENTAL HEALTH STUDENT STIPEND. 

(a) RESERVE COMPONENT MENTAL HEALTH STUDENT STI- PEND.—Section 16201 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN CRITICAL WARTIME

SPECIALTIES.—(1) Under the stipend program under this chapter, 

the Secretary of the military department concerned may enter into 

an agreement with a person who— 

‘‘(A) is eligible to be appointed as an officer in a reserve 

component; 

‘‘(B) is enrolled or has been accepted for enrollment in an 

institution in a course of study that results in a degree in clinical psychology or social work; 

‘‘(C) signs an agreement that, unless sooner separated, the 

person will— 

‘‘(i) complete the educational phase of the program; 

‘‘(ii) accept a reappointment or redesignation within the 

person’s reserve component, if tendered, based upon the person’s health profession, following satisfactory completion of 

the educational and intern programs; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
121 

‘‘(iii) participate in a residency program if required for 

clinical licensure in a mental health profession skill; and 

‘‘(D) if required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

of Defense, agrees to apply for, if eligible, and accept, if offered, 

residency training in a mental health profession skill that has 

been designated by the Secretary as a critically needed wartime 

skill. 

‘‘(2) Under the agreement— 

‘‘(A) the Secretary of the military department concerned 

shall agree to pay the participant a stipend, in the amount determined under subsection (g), for the period or the remainder 

of the period that the student is satisfactorily progressing toward a degree in clinical psychology or social work while enrolled in a school accredited in the designated mental health 

discipline; 

‘‘(B) the participant shall not be eligible to receive such stipend before appointment, designation, or assignment as an officer for service in the Selected Reserve; 

‘‘(C) the participant shall be subject to such active duty requirements as may be specified in the agreement and to active 

duty in time of war or national emergency as provided by law 

for members of the Selected Reserve; and 

‘‘(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon successful 

completion of the program, one year in the Selected Reserve for 

each six months, or part thereof, for which the stipend is provided.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further 

amended— 

(1) in subsections (b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(A), and (d)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘subsection (f)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (g)’’; and 

(2) in subsection (g), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of 

this section, by striking ‘‘subsection (b) or (c)’’ and inserting 

‘‘subsection (b), (c), or (f)’’. 

SEC. 557. FISCAL YEAR 2012 ADMINISTRATION AND REPORT ON THE 

TROOPS-TO-TEACHERS PROGRAM. 

(a) FISCAL YEAR 2012 ADMINISTRATION.—Notwithstanding section 2302(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 6672(c)), the Secretary of Defense may administer 

the Troops-to-Teachers Program during fiscal year 2012. Amounts 

authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense by this 

Act shall be available to the Secretary of Defense for that purpose. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Education shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Troops-to-Teachers 

Program. The report shall include the following: 

(1) A summary of the funding of the Troops-to-Teachers 

Program since its inception and projected funding of the program during the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress during 2011. 

(2) The number of past participants in the Troops-to-Teachers Program by year, the number of past participants who have 

fulfilled, and have not fulfilled, their service obligation under 

the program, and the number of waivers of such obligations 

(and the reasons for such waivers). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
122 

(3) A discussion and assessment of the current and anticipated effects of recent economic circumstances in the United 

States, and cuts nationwide in State and local budgets, on the 

ability of participants in the Troops-to-Teachers Program to obtain teaching positions. 

(4) A discussion of the youth education goals in the Troopsto-Teachers Program and the record of the program to date in 

producing teachers in high-need and other eligible schools. 

(5) An assessment of the extent to which the Troops-toTeachers Program achieves its purpose as a military transition 

assistance program and, in particular, as transition assistance 

program for members of the Armed Forces who are nearing retirement or who are voluntarily or involuntarily separating 

from military service. 

(6) An assessment of the performance of the Troops-toTeachers Program in providing qualified teachers to high-need 

public schools, and reasons for expanding the program to additional school districts. 

(7) A discussion and assessment of the advisability of the 

administration of the Troops-to-Teachers Program by the Department of Education in consultation with the Department of 

Defense. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term 

‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committees on Armed Services and Health, 

Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committees on Armed Services and Education 

and the Workforce of the House of Representatives. 

(2) TROOPS-TO-TEACHERS PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Troops-toTeachers Program’’ means the Troops-to-Teachers Program authorized by chapter A of subpart 1 of part C of title II of the 

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

6671 et seq.). 

SEC. 558. PILOT PROGRAM ON RECEIPT OF CIVILIAN CREDENTIALING 

FOR SKILLS REQUIRED FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL 

SPECIALTIES. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM REQUIRED.—Commencing not later than 

nine months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of permitting enlisted members of the Armed 

Forces to obtain civilian credentialing or licensing for skills required for military occupational specialties (MOS) or qualification 

for duty specialty codes. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall— 

(1) designate not less than three or more than five military 

occupational specialities or duty speciality codes for coverage 

under the pilot program; and 

(2) permit enlisted members of the Armed Forces to obtain 

the credentials or licenses required for the specialities or codes 

so designated through civilian credentialing or licensing entities, institutions, or bodies selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program, whether concurrently with military 

training, at the completion of military training, or both. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
123 

(c) DURATION.—The Secretary shall complete the pilot program 

by not later than five years after the date of the commencement of 

the pilot program. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after commencement of 

the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 

on the pilot program. The report shall set forth the following: 

(1) The number of enlisted members who participated in 

the pilot program. 

(2) A description of the costs incurred by the Department of 

Defense in connection with the receipt by members of 

credentialing or licensing under the pilot program. 

(3) A comparison of the cost associated with receipt by 

members of credentialing or licensing under the pilot program 

with the cost of receipt of similar credentialing or licensing by 

recently-discharged veterans of the Armed Forces under programs currently operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and the Department of Labor. 

(4) The recommendation of the Secretary as to the feasibility and advisability of expanding the pilot program to additional military occupational specialties or duty specialty codes, 

and, if such expansion is considered feasible and advisable, a 

list of the military occupational specialties and duty specialty 

codes recommended for inclusion in the expansion. 

SEC. 559. REPORT ON CERTAIN EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on methods to increase the efficiency of the education assistance programs under sections 1784a and 2007 of title 

10, United States Code. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A description of the effect of the programs on recruiting 

and retention within the Armed Forces. 

(2) An analysis of other programs that provide benefits 

similar to those provided through the programs, including the 

use of education assistance programs under chapters 30 and 33 

of title 38, United States Code, for education and training pursued by members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty 

while they are off-duty. 

(3) A description of the effects of modifying the programs to 

require members of the Armed Forces and dependents participating in the programs to pay an appropriate percentage of 

their education expenses with the Secretary of the military department concerned paying the remaining percentage of such 

expenses, with the intent of ensuring that members and their 

dependents give due consideration to their educational needs before enrolling in the programs. 

(4) A description of the costs of the programs to the Department of Defense, including the following elements for each institution of higher education that received funds under the programs during any of fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011: 

(A) The name and location of the institution of higher 

education. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
124 

(B) Whether the institution is a public, non-profit, or 

for-profit institution. 

(C) The amount of funds received by the institution in 

each such fiscal year. 

(D) The number of members of the Armed Forces and 

dependents who received education at the institution during each such fiscal year. 

(E) The average amount of funds members and dependents received under the programs. 

(5) A description of the education outcomes for members of 

the Armed Forces and dependents participating in the program 

during fiscal years, 2009, 2010, 2011, including the following: 

(A) Credit accumulation. 

(B) Completion of education on-time or within 150 percent of on-time. 

(C) Completion of a degree. 

(D) Loan defaults, if applicable. 

(6) A description of the feasibility and desirability of requiring institutions of higher learning, as a requirement for 

participation in the programs, to report to the Secretary of Defense, as well as disclose, provide, and make publicly available 

through electronic or other means to members of the Armed 

Forces participating in the programs, the following information 

about their programs prior to enrollment: 

(A) When applicable, qualifications for examination, 

certification, or licensure required as a precondition for employment in the occupation or skill for which the program 

is represented to prepare the student, and whether the program meets those requirements. 

(B) The normal and average time to completion of the 

program. Normal time to completion means the amount of 

time it would take a full-time student to complete the program. 

(C) The completion, graduation, and dropout rates of 

students for the institution. 

(D) Information concerning average student indebtedness for each program resulting from Federal, private, and 

institutional loans. 

(E) Whether the institution participates, or is eligible to 

participate, under in financial aid programs under title IV 

of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

Subtitle F—Armed Forces Retirement Home 

SEC. 561. CONTROL AND ADMINISTRATION BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 

Section 1511(d) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 

1991 (24 U.S.C. 411(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The administration of the Retirement Home, including administration for the provision of health care and medical care for 

residents, shall remain under the control and administration of the 

Secretary of Defense.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
125 

SEC. 562. SENIOR MEDICAL ADVISOR OVERSIGHT OF HEALTH CARE 

PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS OF ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME. 

(a) ADVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES OF SENIOR MEDICAL ADVISOR.—Subsection (b) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(1) The’’; and inserting ‘‘The’’; 

(2) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(3) by striking ‘‘and the Chief Operating Officer’’ and all 

that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘the Chief Operating Officer, and the Advisory Council 

regarding the direction and oversight of— 

‘‘(1) medical administrative matters at each facility of the 

Retirement Home; and 

‘‘(2) the provision of medical care, preventive mental health, 

and dental care services at each facility of the Retirement 

Home.’’. 

(b) RELATED DUTIES.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) and inserting the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(3) Periodically visit each facility of the Retirement Home 

to review— 

‘‘(A) the medical facilities, medical operations, medical 

records and reports, and the quality of care provided to 

residents; and 

‘‘(B) inspections and audits to ensure that appropriate 

follow-up regarding issues and recommendations raised by 

such inspections and audits has occurred. 

‘‘(4) Report on the findings and recommendations developed 

as a result of each review conducted under paragraph (3) to the 

Chief Operating Officer, the Advisory Council, and the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.’’. 

SEC. 563. ESTABLISHMENT OF ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME ADVISORY COUNCIL AND RESIDENT ADVISORY COMMITTEES. 

(a) REPLACEMENT OF LOCAL BOARDS OF TRUSTEES.—The 

Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 416) is 

amended by striking section 1516 and inserting the following new 

sections: 

‘‘SEC. 1516. ADVISORY COUNCIL. 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Retirement Home shall have an Advisory Council, to be known as the ‘Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Advisory Council’. The Advisory Council shall serve the interests of 

both facilities of the Retirement Home. 

‘‘(b) DUTIES.—(1) The Advisory Council shall provide to the 

Chief Operating Officer and the Administrator of each facility such 

guidance and recommendations on the administration of the Retirement Home and the quality of care provided to residents as the Advisory Council considers appropriate. 

‘‘(2) Not less often than annually, the Advisory Council shall 

submit to the Secretary of Defense a report summarizing its activities during the preceding year and providing such observations and 

recommendations with respect to the Retirement Home as the Advisory Council considers appropriate. 

‘‘(3) In carrying out its functions, the Advisory Council shall— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
126 

‘‘(A) provide for participation in its activities by a representative of the Resident Advisory Committee of each facility 

of the Retirement Home; and 

‘‘(B) make recommendations to the Inspector General of the 

Department of Defense regarding issues that the Inspector General should investigate. 

‘‘(c) COMPOSITION.—(1) The Advisory Council shall consist of at 

least 15 members, each of whom shall be a full or part-time Federal 

employee or a member of the Armed Forces. 

‘‘(2) Members of the Advisory Council shall be designated by the 

Secretary of Defense, except that an individual who is not an employee of the Department of Defense shall be designated, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, by the head of the Federal department or agency that employs the individual. 

‘‘(3) The Advisory Council shall include the following members: 

‘‘(A) One member who is an expert in nursing home or retirement home administration and financing. 

‘‘(B) One member who is an expert in gerontology. 

‘‘(C) One member who is an expert in financial management. 

‘‘(D) Two representatives of the Department of Veterans Affairs, one to be designated from each of the regional offices 

nearest in proximity to the facilities of the Retirement Home. 

‘‘(E) The Chairpersons of the Resident Advisory Committees. 

‘‘(F) One enlisted representative of the Services’ Retiree Advisory Council. 

‘‘(G) The senior noncommissioned officer of one of the 

Armed Forces. 

‘‘(H) Two senior representatives of military medical treatment facilities, one to be designated from each of the military 

hospitals nearest in proximity to the facilities of the Retirement 

Home. 

‘‘(I) One senior judge advocate from one of the Armed 

Forces. 

‘‘(J) One senior representative of one of the chief personnel 

officers of the Armed Forces. 

‘‘(K) Such other members as the Secretary of Defense may 

designate. 

‘‘(4) The Administrator of the each facility of the Retirement 

Home shall be a nonvoting member of the Advisory Council. 

‘‘(5) The Secretary of Defense shall designate one member of the 

Advisory Council to serve as the Chairperson of the Advisory Council. The Chairperson shall conduct the meetings of the Advisory 

Council. 

‘‘(d) TERM OF SERVICE.—(1) Except as provided in paragraphs 

(2), (3), and (4), the term of service of a member of the Advisory 

Council shall be two years. The Secretary of Defense may designate 

a member to serve one additional term. 

‘‘(2) Unless earlier terminated by the Secretary of Defense, a 

person may continue to serve as a member of the Advisory Council 

after the expiration of the member’s term until a successor is designated. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
127 

‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense may terminate the term of service 

of a member of the Advisory Council before the expiration of the 

member’s term. 

‘‘(4) A member of the Advisory Council serves as a member of 

the Advisory Council only for as long as the member is assigned to 

or serving in a position for which the duties include the duty to 

serve as a member of the Advisory Council. 

‘‘(e) VACANCIES.—A vacancy in the Advisory Council shall be 

filled in the manner in which the original designation was made. 

A member designated to fill a vacancy occurring before the end of 

the term of the predecessor shall be designated for the remainder of 

the term of the predecessor. A vacancy in the Advisory Council shall 

not affect its authority to perform its duties. 

‘‘(f) COMPENSATION.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

a member of the Advisory Council shall— 

‘‘(A) be provided a stipend consistent with the daily government consultant fee for each day on which the member is engaged in the performance of services for the Advisory Council; 

and 

‘‘(B) while away from home or regular place of business in 

the performance of services for the Advisory Council, be allowed 

travel expenses (including per diem in lieu of subsistence) in the 

same manner as a person employed intermittently in Government under sections 5701 through 5707 of title 5, United States 

Code. 

‘‘(2) A member of the Advisory Council who is a member of the 

Armed Forces on active duty or a full-time officer or employee of the 

United States shall receive no additional pay by reason of serving 

as a member of the Advisory Council. 

‘‘SEC. 1516A. RESIDENT ADVISORY COMMITTEES. 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.—(1) A Resident Advisory 

Committee is an elected body of residents at each facility of the Retirement Home established to provide a forum for all residents to express their needs, ideas, and interests through elected representatives of their respective floor or area. 

‘‘(2) A Resident Advisory Committee— 

‘‘(A) serves as a forum for ideas, recommendations, and representation to management of that facility of the Retirement 

Home to enhance the morale, safety, health, and well-being of 

residents; and 

‘‘(B) provides a means to communicate policy and general 

information between residents and management. 

‘‘(b) ELECTION PROCESS.—The election process for the Resident 

Advisory Committee at a facility of the Retirement Home shall be 

coordinated by the facility Ombudsman. 

‘‘(c) CHAIRPERSON.—(1) The Chairperson of a Resident Advisory 

Committee shall be elected at large and serve a two-year term. 

‘‘(2) Chairpersons serve as a liaison to the Administrator and 

are voting members of the Advisory Council. Chairpersons shall create meeting agendas, conduct the meetings, and provide a copy of 

the minutes to the Administrator, who will forward the copy to the 

Chief Operating Officer for approval. 

‘‘(d) MEETINGS.—At a minimum, meetings of a Resident Advisory Committee shall be conducted quarterly.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
128 

(1) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1502 of such Act (24 U.S.C. 401) 

is amended— 

(A) by striking paragraph (2); 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); 

and 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) (as so redesignated) the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(3) The term ‘Advisory Council’ means the Armed Forces 

Retirement Home Advisory Council established under section 

1516. 

‘‘(4) The term ‘Resident Advisory Committee’ means an 

elected body of residents at a facility of the Retirement Home established under section 1516A.’’. 

(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER.—Section 1515(c)(2) of such Act (24 U.S.C. 415(c)(2)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘, including the Local Boards of those facilities’’. 

(3) INSPECTION OF RETIREMENT HOME.—Section 1518 of 

such Act (24 U.S.C. 418) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Local Board for 

the facility or the resident advisory committee or council’’ and inserting ‘‘Advisory Council or the Resident 

Advisory Committee’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘Local Board for 

the facility, the resident advisory committee or council’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Advisory Council, the Resident Advisory 

Committee’’; 

(B) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘Local Board for the 

facility’’ and inserting ‘‘Advisory Council’’; and 

(C) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘Local Board for the 

facility’’ and inserting ‘‘Advisory Council’’. 

SEC. 564. ADMINISTRATORS, OMBUDSMEN, AND STAFF OF FACILITIES. 

(a) LEADERSHIP OF FACILITIES OF THE RETIREMENT HOME.— 

Section 1517 of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 

U.S.C. 417) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘a Director, a Deputy Director, and an Associate Director’’ and inserting ‘‘an Administrator and an Ombudsman’’; 

(2) in subsections (b) and (c)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘DIRECTOR’’ in each subsection heading 

and inserting ‘‘ADMINISTRATOR’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘Director’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Administrator’’; 

(3) by striking subsections (d) and (e) and redesignating 

subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and 

(g), respectively; 

(4) in subsection (d), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR’’ in the subsection heading and inserting ‘‘OMBUDSMAN’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘Associate Director’’ in paragraphs (1) 

and (2) and inserting ‘‘Ombudsman’’; 

(5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR.—’’ in the subsection heading and inserting ‘‘OMBUDSMAN.—(1)’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
129 

(B) by striking ‘‘Associate Director’’ and inserting ‘‘Ombudsman’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘Director and Deputy Director’’ and inserting ‘‘Administrator’’; 

(D) by striking ‘‘Director may’’ and inserting ‘‘Administrator may’’; and 

(E) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) The Ombudsman may provide information to the Administrator, the Chief Operating Officer, the Senior Medical Advisor, the 

Inspector General of the Department of Defense, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.’’; 

(6) in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘Director’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Administrator’’; and 

(7) in subsection (g), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘DIRECTORS’’ in the subsection heading 

and inserting ‘‘ADMINISTRATORS’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Directors’’ and inserting ‘‘Administrators’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘a Director’’ and inserting ‘‘an Administrator’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) REFERENCES TO DIRECTOR.—Sections 1511(d)(2), 

1512(c), 1514(a), 1518(b)(4), 1518(c), 1518(d)(2), 1520, 1522, 

and 1523(b) of such Act are amended by striking ‘‘Director’’ 

each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Administrator’’. 

(2) REFERENCES TO DIRECTORS.—Sections 1514(b) and 

1520(c) of such Act (24 U.S.C. 414(b), 420(c)) are amended by 

striking ‘‘Directors’’ and inserting ‘‘Administrators’’. 

SEC. 565. REVISION OF FEE REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) LIMITATION ON MAXIMUM MONTHLY AMOUNT OF FEES.— 

Subsection (c)(3) of section 1514 of the Armed Forces Retirement 

Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 414) is amended by striking the last 

sentence. 

(b) REPEAL OF FORMER TRANSITIONAL FEE STRUCTURES.—Such 

section is further amended by striking subsection (d). 

SEC. 566. REVISION OF INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 1518 of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 

(24 U.S.C. 418) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘In any year in which a facility of the 

Retirement Home is not inspected by a nationally recognized civilian accrediting organization,’’ and inserting ‘‘Not 

less often than once every three years,’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘of that facility’’ and inserting ‘‘of each 

facility of the Retirement Home’’; and 

(C) by inserting ‘‘long-term care,’’ after ‘‘assisted living,’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘45 days’’ and inserting ‘‘90 days’’; and 

(B) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
130 

‘‘(2) A report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include a 

plan by the Chief Operating Officer to address the recommendations 

and other matters contained in the report.’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e)(1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘45 days’’ and inserting ‘‘60 days’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘Director of the facility concerned shall 

submit to the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness, the Chief Operating Officer’’ and inserting 

‘‘Chief Operating Officer shall submit to the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, the Senior 

Medical Advisor’’. 

SEC. 567. REPEAL OF OBSOLETE TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND 

TECHNICAL, CONFORMING, AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 

(a) REPEAL OF TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS.—Part B of the 

Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991, consisting of sections 

1531, 1532, and 1533 relating to transitional provisions for the 

Armed Forces Retirement Home Board and the Directors and Deputy Directors of the facilities of the Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(24 U.S.C. 431, 432, 433), is repealed. 

(b) CORRECTION OF OBSOLETE REFERENCES TO RETIREMENT

HOME BOARD.— 

(1) ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME ACT.—Section 

1519(a)(2) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 

(24 U.S.C. 419(a)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘Retirement Home 

Board’’ and inserting ‘‘Chief Operating Officer’’. 

(2) TITLE 10.— 

(A) DEFENSE OF CERTAIN SUITS.—Section 1089(g)(3) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

‘‘Armed Forces Retirement Home Board’’ and inserting 

‘‘Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement 

Home’’. 

(B) FINES AND FORFEITURES.—Section 2772(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Armed 

Forces Retirement Home Board’’ and inserting ‘‘Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home’’. 

(c) SECTION HEADINGS.— 

(1) SECTION 1501.—The heading of section 1501 of the 

Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 401 

note) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 1501. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.’’. 

(2) SECTION 1513.—The heading of section 1513 of such Act 

(24 U.S.C. 413) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 1513. SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS.’’. 

(3) SECTION 1513A.—The heading of section 1513A of such 

Act (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 1513A. OVERSIGHT OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS.’’. 

(4) SECTION 1517.—The heading of section 1517 of such Act 

(24 U.S.C. 417) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 1517. ADMINISTRATORS, OMBUDSMEN, AND STAFF OF FACILITIES.’’. 

(5) SECTION 1518.—The heading of section 1518 of such Act 

(24 U.S.C. 418) is amended to read as follows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
131 

‘‘SEC. 1518. PERIODIC INSPECTION OF RETIREMENT HOME FACILITIES 

BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL AND 

OUTSIDE INSPECTORS.’’. 

(6) PUNCTUATION.—The headings of sections 1512 and 

1520 of such Act (24 U.S.C. 412, 420) are amended by adding 

a period at the end. 

(d) PART A HEADER.—The heading for part A is repealed. 

(e) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents in section 

1501(b) of such Act is amended— 

(1) by striking the item relating to the heading for part A; 

(2) by striking the items relating to sections 1513 and 

1513A and inserting the following new items: 

‘‘Sec. 1513. Services provided to residents. 

‘‘Sec. 1513A. Oversight of health care provided to residents.’’; 

(3) by striking the items relating to sections 1516, 1517, 

and 1518 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 1516. Advisory Council. 

‘‘Sec. 1516A. Resident Advisory Committees. 

‘‘Sec. 1517. Administrators, Ombudsmen, and staff of facilities. 

‘‘Sec. 1518. Periodic inspection of Retirement Home facilities by Department of Defense Inspector General and outside inspectors.’’; and 

(4) by striking the items relating to part B (including the 

items relating to sections 1531, 1532, and 1533). 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military 

Family Readiness Matters 

SEC. 571. IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES. 

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table 

in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments under 

section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106– 

398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a). 

SEC. 572. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 

(a) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF

MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.—Of the amount authorized to be 

appropriated for fiscal year 2012 by section 301 and available for 

operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified 

in the funding table in section 4301, $30,000,000 shall be available 

only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational 

agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 

U.S.C. 7703b). 

(b) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH ENROLLMENT CHANGES DUE

TO BASE CLOSURES, FORCE STRUCTURE CHANGES, OR FORCE RELOCATIONS.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 

year 2012 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in 

section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of 

providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
132 

(b) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b). 

(c) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 

SEC. 573. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES ON TRANSITION OF MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS AMONG LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES. 

(a) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES.—Paragraph (2)(B) of section 

574(d) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2007 (20 U.S.C. 7703b note) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘grant assistance’’ after ‘‘To provide’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘including—‘‘ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘including programs on the following: 

‘‘(i) Access to virtual and distance learning capabilities 

and related applications. 

‘‘(ii) Training for teachers. 

‘‘(iii) Academic strategies to increase academic achievement. 

‘‘(iv) Curriculum development. 

‘‘(v) Support for practices that minimize the impact of 

transition and deployment. 

‘‘(vi) Other appropriate services to improve the academic achievement of such students.’’. 

(b) THREE-YEAR EXTENSION.—Paragraph (3) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2016’’. 

SEC. 574. REVISION TO MEMBERSHIP OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

MILITARY FAMILY READINESS COUNCIL. 

Subsection (b) of section 1781a of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) MEMBERS.—(1) The Council shall consist of the following 

members: 

‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness, who shall serve as chair of the Council and who 

may designate a representative to chair the council in the 

Under Secretary’s absence. 

‘‘(B) The following persons, who shall be appointed or designated by the Secretary of Defense: 

‘‘(i) One representative of each of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, each of whom shall be a member 

of the armed force to be represented. 

‘‘(ii) One representative of the Army National Guard or 

the Air National Guard, who may be a member of the National Guard. 

‘‘(iii) One spouse or parent of a member of each of the 

Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, two of whom 

shall be the spouse or parent of an active component member and two of whom shall be the spouse or parent of a reserve component member. 

‘‘(C) Three individuals appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among representatives of military family organizations, including military family organizations of families of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
133 

members of the regular components and of families of members 

of the reserve components. 

‘‘(D) The senior enlisted advisor from each of the Army, 

Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, except that two of these 

members may instead be selected from among the spouses of the 

senior enlisted advisors. 

‘‘(E) The Director of the Office of Community Support for 

Military Families with Special Needs. 

‘‘(2)(A) The term on the Council of the members appointed or 

designated under clauses (i) and (iii) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be two years and may be renewed by the Secretary 

of Defense. Representation on the Council under clause (ii) of that 

subparagraph shall rotate between the Army National Guard and 

Air National Guard every two years on a calendar year basis. 

‘‘(B) The term on the Council of the members appointed under 

subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) shall be three years.’’. 

SEC. 575. REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOLLOWING CERTAIN NATIONAL 

GUARD DUTY. 

Section 4312(c)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) ordered to full-time National Guard duty (other 

than for training) under section 502(f)(2)(A) of title 32 

when authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for the purpose of responding to a national emergency 

declared by the President and supported by Federal funds, 

as determined by the Secretary concerned.’’. 

SEC. 576. EXPANSION OF OPERATION HERO MILES. 

(a) EXPANDED DEFINITION OF TRAVEL BENEFIT.—Subsection (b) 

of section 2613 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(b) TRAVEL BENEFIT DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘travel 

benefit’ means— 

‘‘(1) frequent traveler miles, credits for tickets, or tickets for 

air or surface transportation issued by an air carrier or a surface carrier, respectively, that serves the public; and 

‘‘(2) points or awards for free or reduced-cost accommodations issued by an inn, hotel, or other commercial establishment 

that provides lodging to transient guests.’’. 

(b) CONDITION ON AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT DONATION.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘the air or surface carrier’’ and inserting 

‘‘the business entity referred to in subsection (b)’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘the surface carrier’’ and inserting ‘‘the business entity’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘the carrier’’ and inserting ‘‘the business entity’’. 

(c) ADMINISTRATION.—Subsection (e)(3) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘the air carrier or surface carrier’’ and inserting ‘‘the business entity referred to in subsection (b)’’. 

(d) STYLISTIC AMENDMENTS.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
134 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 2613. Acceptance of frequent traveler miles, credits, points, 

and tickets: use to facilitate rest and recuperation 

travel of deployed members and their families’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 155 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 2613 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘2613. Acceptance of frequent traveler miles, credits, points, and tickets: use to facilitate rest and recuperation travel of deployed members and their families.’’. 

SEC. 577. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTISM PILOT AND 

DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 14, 2013, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on all 

pilot and demonstration projects and all other efforts being conducted by the Department of Defense on autism services. 

(b) MATTERS COVERED.—At a minimum, the report under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the demand for autism 

treatment services by military families, including the intensity and 

volumes of use across specific diagnoses and age groups and the 

availability of qualified providers of such treatment services. 

SEC. 578. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT 

ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY SPOUSE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall carry out a review of all current Department of Defense military spouse employment programs. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The review required by subsection (a) shall, address, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) All current Department of Defense military spouse employment programs, and the efficacy and effectiveness of each 

such program. 

(2) The types of military spouse employment programs that 

have been considered or used in the past by the Department. 

(3) The ways in which military spouse employment programs have changed in recent years. 

(4) The benefits or programs that are specifically available 

to provide employment assistance to spouses of members of the 

Armed Forces serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation 

Enduring Freedom, or Operation New Dawn, or any other contingency operation being conducted by the Armed Forces as of 

the date of such review. 

(5) Existing mechanisms available to military spouses to 

express their views on the effectiveness and future direction of 

Department programs and policies on employment assistance 

for military spouses. 

(6) The oversight provided by the Office of Personnel and 

Management regarding preferences for military spouses in Federal employment. 

(7) The total funding available to the Department for each 

military spouse employment program and the amount obligated 

by the Department for each such program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
135 

(8) The number (or a reasonable estimate if a precise number is not available) of military spouses who have obtained employment following participation in a Department military 

spouse employment program, as a whole and for each military 

spouse employment program. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

review carried out under subsection (a). The report shall set forth 

the following: 

(1) The results of the review concerned. 

(2) Such clear and concrete metrics as the Comptroller General considers appropriate for the current and future evaluation 

and assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of Department 

of Defense military spouse employment programs. 

(3) A description of the assumptions utilized in the review, 

and an assessment of the validity and completeness of such assumptions. 

(4) Such recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate for improving Department military spouse 

employment programs. 

Subtitle H—Improved Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response in the Armed Forces 

SEC. 581. ACCESS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS TO LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES OF SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS AND SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES. 

(a) LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.—Not 

later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

Secretaries of the military departments shall prescribe regulations 

on the provision of legal assistance to victims of sexual assault. 

Such regulations shall require that legal assistance be provided by 

military or civilian legal assistance counsel pursuant to section 

1044 of title 10, United States Code. 

(b) ASSISTANCE AND REPORTING.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 80 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1565a the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1565b. Victims of sexual assault: access to legal assistance 

and services of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates 

‘‘(a) AVAILABILITY OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND VICTIM ADVOCATE

SERVICES.—(1) A member of the armed forces, or a dependent of a 

member, who is the victim of a sexual assault may be provided the 

following: 

‘‘(A) Legal assistance provided by military or civilian legal 

assistance counsel pursuant to section 1044 of this title. 

‘‘(B) Assistance provided by a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator. 

‘‘(C) Assistance provided by a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

‘‘(2) A member of the armed forces or dependent who is the victim of sexual assault shall be informed of the availability of assistance under paragraph (1) as soon as the member or dependent seeks 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
136 

assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/ 

witness liaison, or a trial counsel. The member or dependent shall 

also be informed that the legal assistance and the services of a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate under paragraph (1) are optional and may be declined, in 

whole or in part, at any time. 

‘‘(3) Legal assistance and the services of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates under 

paragraph (1) shall be available to a member or dependent regardless of whether the member or dependent elects unrestricted or restricted (confidential) reporting of the sexual assault. 

‘‘(b) RESTRICTED REPORTING.—(1) Under regulations prescribed 

by the Secretary of Defense, a member of the armed forces, or a dependent of a member, who is the victim of a sexual assault may 

elect to confidentially disclose the details of the assault to an individual specified in paragraph (2) and receive medical treatment, 

legal assistance under section 1044 of this title, or counseling, without initiating an official investigation of the allegations. 

‘‘(2) The individuals specified in this paragraph are the following: 

‘‘(A) A Sexual Assault Response Coordinator. 

‘‘(B) A Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

‘‘(C) Healthcare personnel specifically identified in the regulations required by paragraph (1).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 1565a the following new item: 

‘‘1565b. Victims of sexual assault: access to legal assistance and services of Sexual 

Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates.’’. 

SEC. 582. CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT 

CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT TRANSFER BASED ON HUMANITARIAN CONDITIONS FOR VICTIM OF SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RELATED OFFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 672 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 673. Consideration of application for permanent change of 

station or unit transfer for members on active duty 

who are the victim of a sexual assault or related offense 

‘‘(a) TIMELY CONSIDERATION AND ACTION.—The Secretary concerned shall provide for timely determination and action on an application for consideration of a change of station or unit transfer 

submitted by a member of the armed forces serving on active duty 

who was a victim of a sexual assault or other offense covered by section 920, 920a, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, or 120c) so 

as to reduce the possibility of retaliation against the member for reporting the sexual assault or other offense. 

‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretaries of the military departments 

shall issue regulations to carry out this section, within guidelines 

provided by the Secretary of Defense. These guidelines shall provide 

that the application submitted by a member described in subsection 

(a) for a change of station or unit transfer must be approved or disapproved by the member’s commanding officer within 72 hours of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
137 

the submission of the application. Additionally, if the application is 

disapproved by the commanding officer, the member shall be given 

the opportunity to request review by the first general officer or flag 

officer in the chain of command of the member, and that decision 

must be made within 72 hours of submission of the request for review.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 672 the following new item: 

‘‘673. Consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer 

for members on active duty who are the victim of a sexual assault or 

related offense.’’. 

SEC. 583. DIRECTOR OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE OFFICE. 

Section 1611(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 

note) is amended by adding before the period at the end of the first 

sentence the following: ‘‘, who shall be appointed from among general or flag officers of the Armed Forces or employees of the Department of Defense in a comparable Senior Executive Service position’’. 

SEC. 584. SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS AND SEXUAL 

ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATES. 

(a) ASSIGNMENT OF COORDINATORS.— 

(1) ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS.—At least one full-time 

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator shall be assigned to each 

brigade or equivalent unit level of the armed forces. The Secretary of the military department concerned may assign additional Sexual Assault Response Coordinators as necessary 

based on the demographics or needs of the unit. An additional 

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator may serve on a full-time 

or part-time basis at the discretion of the Secretary. 

(2) ELIGIBLE PERSONS.—On and after October 1, 2013, only 

members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator. 

(b) ASSIGNMENT OF VICTIM ADVOCATES.— 

(1) ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS.—At least one full-time 

Sexual Assault Victim Advocate shall be assigned to each brigade or equivalent unit level of the armed forces. The Secretary 

of the military department concerned may assign additional 

Victim Advocates as necessary based on the demographics or 

needs of the unit. An additional Victim Advocate may serve on 

a full-time or part-time basis at the discretion of the Secretary. 

(2) ELIGIBLE PERSONS.—On and after October 1, 2013, only 

members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Victim Advocate. 

(c) TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION.— 

(1) TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.—As part of the 

sexual assault prevention and response program, the Secretary 

of Defense shall establish a professional and uniform training 

and certification program for Sexual Assault Response Coordinators assigned under subsection (a) and Sexual Assault Victim 

Advocates assigned under subsection (b). The program shall be 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
138 

structured and administered in a manner similar to the professional training available for Equal Opportunity Advisors 

through the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the curriculum and 

other components of the program, the Secretary of Defense shall 

work with experts outside of the Department of Defense who are 

experts in victim advocacy and sexual assault prevention and 

response training. 

(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—On and after October 1, 2013, before 

a member or civilian employee may be assigned to duty as a 

Sexual Assault Response Coordinator under subsection (a) or 

Victim Advocate under subsection (b), the member or employee 

must have completed the training program required by paragraph (1) and obtained the certification. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘armed forces’’ means the Army, Navy, Air 

Force, and Marine Corps. 

(2) The term ‘‘sexual assault prevention and response program’’ has the meaning given such term in section 1601(a) of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note). 

SEC. 585. TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM. 

(a) SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE TRAINING

AND EDUCATION.— 

(1) DEVELOPMENT OF CURRICULUM.—Not later than one 

year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of each military department shall develop a curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response training and education for members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction 

of the Secretary and civilian employees of the military department to strengthen individual knowledge, skills, and capacity to 

prevent and respond to sexual assault. In developing the curriculum, the Secretary shall work with experts outside of the 

Department of Defense who are experts sexual assault prevention and response training. 

(2) SCOPE OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION.—The sexual assault prevention and response training and education shall encompass initial entry and accession programs, annual refresher 

training, professional military education, peer education, and 

specialized leadership training. Training shall be tailored for 

specific leadership levels and local area requirements. 

(3) CONSISTENT TRAINING.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

ensure that the sexual assault prevention and response training 

provided to members of the Armed Forces and Department of 

Defense civilian employees is consistent throughout the military 

departments. 

(b) INCLUSION IN PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION.—The 

Secretary of Defense shall provide for the inclusion of a sexual assault prevention and response training module at each level of professional military education. The training shall be tailored to the 

new responsibilities and leadership requirements of members of the 

Armed Forces as they are promoted. 

(c) INCLUSION IN FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
139 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct that 

managers of specialty skills associated with first responders described in paragraph (2) integrate sexual assault response 

training in initial and recurring training courses. 

(2) COVERED FIRST RESPONDERS.—First responders referred 

to in paragraph (1) include firefighters, emergency medical 

technicians, law enforcement officers, military criminal investigators, healthcare personnel, judge advocates, and chaplains. 

SEC. 586. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY AND PROCEDURES ON 

RETENTION AND ACCESS TO EVIDENCE AND RECORDS RELATING TO SEXUAL ASSAULTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF 

THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON RETENTION AND ACCESS TO

RECORDS.—Not later than October 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense 

shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, develop 

a comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. 

(b) OBJECTIVES.—The comprehensive policy required by subsection (a) shall include policies and procedures (including systems 

of records) necessary to ensure preservation of records and evidence 

for periods of time that ensure that members of the Armed Forces 

and veterans of military service who were the victims of sexual assault during military service are able to substantiate claims for veterans benefits, to support criminal or civil prosecutions by military 

or civil authorities, and for such purposes relating to the documentation of the incidence of sexual assault in the Armed Forces as 

the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. 

(c) ELEMENTS.—In developing the comprehensive policy required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider, at 

a minimum, the following matters: 

(1) Identification of records, including non-Department of 

Defense records, relating to an incident of sexual assault, that 

must be retained. 

(2) Criteria for collection and retention of records. 

(3) Identification of physical evidence and non-documentary 

forms of evidence relating to sexual assaults that must be retained. 

(4) Length of time records, including Department of Defense 

Forms 2910 and 2911, and evidence must be retained, except 

that— 

(A) the length of time physical evidence and forensic 

evidence must be retained shall be not less than five years; 

and 

(B) the length of time documentary evidence relating to 

sexual assaults must be retained shall be not less than the 

length of time investigative records relating to reports of 

sexual assaults of that type (restricted or unrestricted reports) must be retained. 

(5) Locations where records must be stored. 

(6) Media which may be used to preserve records and assure access, including an electronic systems of records. 

(7) Protection of privacy of individuals named in records 

and status of records under section 552 of title 5, United States 

Code (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Freedom of Information 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
140 

Act’’), section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Privacy Act’’), restricted reporting cases, and 

laws related to privilege. 

(8) Access to records by victims of sexual assault, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and others, including alleged assailants and law enforcement authorities. 

(9) Responsibilities for record retention by the military departments. 

(10) Education and training on record retention requirements. 

(11) Uniform collection of data on the incidence of sexual 

assaults and on disciplinary actions taken in substantiated 

cases of sexual assault. 

(d) UNIFORM APPLICATION TO MILITARY DEPARTMENTS.—The 

Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, the policy developed under subsection (a) is implemented 

uniformly by the military departments. 

(e) COPY OF RECORDS OF COURT-MARTIAL TO VICTIM OF SEXUAL

ASSAULT.—Section 854 of title 10, United States Code (article 54 of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the 

end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) In the case of a general or special court-martial involving 

a sexual assault or other offense covered by section 920 of this title 

(article 120), a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings of the 

court-martial shall be given to the victim of the offense if the victim 

testified during the proceedings. The records of the proceedings 

shall be provided without charge and as soon as the records are authenticated. The victim shall be notified of the opportunity to receive 

the records of the proceedings.’’. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

SEC. 588. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT PERSONNEL RECOVERY REINTEGRATION AND POST-ISOLATION SUPPORT ACTIVITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 1056 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 1056a. Reintegration of recovered Department of Defense 

personnel; post-isolation support activities for other 

recovered personnel 

‘‘(a) REINTEGRATION AND SUPPORT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out the following: 

‘‘(1) Reintegration activities for recovered persons who are 

Department of Defense personnel. 

‘‘(2) Post-isolation support activities for or on behalf of 

other recovered persons who are officers or employees of the 

United States Government, military or civilian officers or employees of an allied or coalition partner of the United States, or 

other United States or foreign nationals. 

‘‘(b) ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED.—(1) The activities authorized by 

subsection (a) for or on behalf of a recovered person may include the 

following: 

‘‘(A) The provision of food, clothing, necessary medical support, and essential sundry items for the recovered person. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
141 

‘‘(B) In accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, travel and transportation allowances for not 

more than three family members, or other designated individuals, determined by the commander or head of a military medical treatment facility to be beneficial for the reintegration of 

the recovered person and whose presence may contribute to improving the physical and mental health of the recovered person. 

‘‘(C) Transportation or reimbursement for transportation in 

connection with the attendance of the recovered person at events 

or functions determined by the commander or head of a military medical treatment facility to contribute to the physical and 

mental health of the recovered person. 

‘‘(2) Medical support may be provided under paragraph (1)(A) 

to a recovered person who is not a member of the armed forces for 

not more than 20 days. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘post-isolation support’, in the case of a recovered person, means— 

‘‘(A) the debriefing of the recovered person following a 

separation as described in paragraph (2); 

‘‘(B) activities to promote or support the physical and 

mental health of the recovered person following such a separation; and 

‘‘(C) other activities to facilitate return of the recovered 

person to military or civilian life as expeditiously as possible following such a separation. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘recovered person’ means an individual who 

is returned alive from separation (whether as an individual or 

a group) while participating in or in association with a United 

States-sponsored military activity or mission in which the individual was detained in isolation or held in captivity by a hostile entity. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘reintegration’, in the case of a recovered person, means— 

‘‘(A) the debriefing of the recovered person following a 

separation as described in paragraph (2); 

‘‘(B) activities to promote or support for the physical 

and mental health of the recovered person following such a 

separation; and 

‘‘(C) other activities to facilitate return of the recovered 

person to military duty or employment with the Department 

of Defense as expeditiously as possible following such a separation.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 1056 the following new item: 

‘‘1056a. Reintegration of recovered Department of Defense personnel; post-isolation 

support activities for other recovered personnel.’’. 

SEC. 589. MILITARY ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM. 

(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—Chapter 152 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2564 the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
142 

‘‘§ 2564a. Provision of assistance for adaptive sports programs for members of the armed forces 

‘‘(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may 

establish a military adaptive sports program to support the provision of adaptive sports programming for members of the armed 

forces who are eligible to participate in adaptive sports because of 

an injury or wound incurred in the line of duty in the armed forces. 

‘‘(2) In establishing the military adaptive sports program, the 

Secretary of Defense shall— 

‘‘(A) consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs; and 

‘‘(B) avoid duplicating programs conducted by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs under section 521A of title 38. 

‘‘(b) PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE; PURPOSE.—(1) Under such criteria as the Secretary of Defense may establish under the military 

adaptive sports program, the Secretary may award grants to, or 

enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with, entities for the 

purpose of planning, developing, managing, and implementing 

adaptive sports programming for members described in subsection 

(a). 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall use competitive procedures 

to award any grant or to enter into any contract or cooperative 

agreement under this subsection. 

‘‘(c) USE OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance provided under the military adaptive sports program shall be used— 

‘‘(1) for the purposes specified in subsection (b); and 

‘‘(2) for such related activities and expenses as the Secretary 

of Defense may authorize.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 717 the following new item: 

‘‘2564a. Provision of assistance for adaptive sports programs for members of the 

armed forces.’’. 

SEC. 590. ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF YELLOW RIBBON REINTEGRATION PROGRAM. 

(a) INCLUSION OF PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH IN PROGRAM.—Subsection (b) of section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended by inserting 

‘‘(including programs of outreach)’’ after ‘‘informational events and 

activities’’. 

(b) RESTATEMENT OF FUNCTIONS OF CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE

IN REINTEGRATION AND INCLUSION IN FUNCTIONS OF IDENTIFICATION OF BEST PRACTICES IN PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH.—Subsection 

(d)(2) of such section is amended by striking the second, third, and 

fourth sentences and inserting the following: ‘‘The Center shall have 

the following functions: 

‘‘(A) To collect and analyze ‘lessons learned’ and suggestions from State National Guard and Reserve organizations with existing or developing reintegration programs. 

‘‘(B) To assist in developing training aids and briefing 

materials and training representatives from State National 

Guard and Reserve organizations. 

‘‘(C) To develop and implement a process for evaluating 

the effectiveness of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program in supporting the health and well-being of members 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
143 

of the Armed Forces and their families throughout the deployment cycle described in subsection (g). 

‘‘(D) To develop and implement a process for identifying best practices in the delivery of information and services in programs of outreach as described in subsection (j).’’. 

(c) STATE-LED PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(j) STATE-LED PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH.—The Office for Reintegration Programs may work with the States, whether acting 

through or in coordination with their National Guard and Reserve 

organizations, to assist the States and such organizations in developing and carrying out programs of outreach for members of the 

Armed Forces and their families to inform and educate them on the 

assistance and services available to them under the Yellow Ribbon 

Reintegration Program, including the assistance and services described in subsection (h).’’. 

(d) SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES UNDER PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH.— 

Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following 

new subsection: 

‘‘(k) SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES UNDER PROGRAMS OF OUTREACH.— 

For purposes of this section, the activities and services provided 

under programs of outreach may include personalized and substantive care coordination services targeted specifically to individual 

members of the Armed Forces and their families.’’. 

SEC. 591. ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES. 

(a) MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AND OVERSIGHT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after chapter 445 the following new chapter: 

‘‘CHAPTER 446—ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY 

CEMETERIES 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘4721. Authority and responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army. 

‘‘4722. Interment and inurnment policy. 

‘‘4723. Advisory committee on Arlington National Cemetery. 

‘‘4724. Executive Director. 

‘‘4725. Superintendents. 

‘‘4726. Oversight and inspections. 

‘‘§ 4721. Authority and responsibilities of the Secretary of the 

Army 

‘‘(a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Army shall develop, operate, manage, administer, oversee, and fund the Army National Military Cemeteries specified in subsection (b) in a manner 

and to standards that fully honor the service and sacrifices of the 

deceased members of the armed forces buried or inurned in the 

Cemeteries. 

‘‘(b) ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES.—The Army National Military Cemeteries (in this chapter referred to as the ‘Cemeteries’) consist of the following: 

‘‘(1) Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia. 

‘‘(2) The United States Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery in the District of Colombia. 

‘‘(c) ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.—The Cemeteries shall be 

under the jurisdiction of Headquarters, Department of the Army. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
144 

‘‘(d) REGULATIONS AND OTHER POLICIES.—The Secretary of the 

Army shall prescribe such regulations and policies as may be necessary to administer the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(e) BUDGETARY AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 

House of Representatives an annual budget request (and detailed 

justifications for the amount of the request) to fund administration, 

operation and maintenance, and construction related to the Cemeteries. The Secretary may include, as necessary, proposals for new 

or amended statutory authority related to the Cemeteries. 

‘‘§ 4722. Interment and inurnment policy 

‘‘(a) ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS GENERALLY.—(1) The Secretary of the Army, with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, 

shall determine eligibility for interment or inurnment in the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of the Army, with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, shall establish policy and procedures for reviewing and determining requests for exceptions to interment and 

inurnment eligibility policy, which shall include a requirement, before granting the request for an exception, for notification of the 

Committees on Armed Services and the Committees on Veterans Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(b) REMOVAL OF REMAINS.—Under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe under section 4721(d) of this title, 

the Secretary of the Army may authorize the removal of the remains 

of a person described in subsection (c) from one of the Cemeteries 

for re-interment or re-inurnment if, upon the death of the primary 

person eligible for interment or inurnment in the Cemeteries, the deceased primary eligible person will not be buried in the same or an 

adjoining grave. 

‘‘(c) COVERED PERSONS.—Except as provided in subsection (d), 

the persons whose remains may be removed pursuant to subsection 

(b) are the deceased spouse, a minor child, and, in the discretion of 

the Secretary of the Army, an unmarried adult child of a member 

eligible for interment or inurnment in the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(d) EXCEPTIONS.—The remains of a person described in subsection (c) may not be removed from one of the Cemeteries under 

subsection (b) if the primary person eligible for burial in the Cemeteries is a person— 

‘‘(1) who is missing in action; 

‘‘(2) whose remains have not been recovered or identified; 

‘‘(3) whose remains were buried at sea, whether by the 

choice of the person or otherwise; 

‘‘(4) whose remains were donated to science; or 

‘‘(5) whose remains were cremated and whose ashes were 

scattered without interment of any portion of the ashes. 

‘‘§ 4723. Advisory committee on Arlington National Cemetery 

‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT.—The Secretary of the Army shall appoint 

an advisory committee on Arlington National Cemetery. 

‘‘(b) ROLE.—The Secretary of the Army shall advise and consult 

with the advisory committee with respect to the administration of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
145 

Arlington National Cemetery, the erection of memorials at the cemetery, and master planning for the cemetery. 

‘‘(c) REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—The advisory committee shall make periodic reports and recommendations to the Secretary of the Army. 

‘‘(d) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 90 days after 

receiving a report or recommendations from the advisory committee 

under subsection (c), the Secretary of the Army shall submit the report or recommendations to the congressional defense committees 

and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and House 

of Representatives and include such comments and recommendations of the Secretary as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

‘‘§ 4724. Executive Director 

‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS.—(1) There shall be an 

Executive Director of the Army National Military Cemeteries who 

shall meet such professional qualifications as may be established by 

the Secretary of the Army. 

‘‘(2) The Executive Director reports directly to the Secretary. 

‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Executive Director is responsible 

for the following: 

‘‘(1) Exercising authority, direction and control over all aspects of the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(2) Establishing and maintaining full accountability for 

all gravesites and inurnment niches in the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(3) Oversight of the construction, operation and maintenance, and repair of the buildings, structures, and utilities of 

the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(4) Acquisition and maintenance of real property and interests in real property for the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(5) Planning and conducting private ceremonies at the 

Cemeteries, including funeral and memorial services for interment and inurnment, and planning and conducting public ceremonies, as directed by the Secretary of the Army. 

‘‘(6) Formulating, promulgating, administering, and overseeing policies and addressing proposals for the placement of 

memorials and monuments in the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(7) Formulating and implementing a master plan for Arlington National Cemetery that, at a minimum, addresses interment and inurnment capacity, visitor accommodation, operation and maintenance, capital requirements, preservation of 

the cemetery’s special features, and other matters the Executive 

Director considers appropriate. 

‘‘(8) Overseeing the programming, planning, budgeting, and 

execution of funds authorized and appropriated for the Cemeteries. 

‘‘(9) Providing recommendations regarding any request for 

an exception to interment and inurnment eligibility policy. 

‘‘(10) Supervising the superintendents of the Cemeteries. 

‘‘§ 4725. Superintendents 

‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS.—An individual serving as the superintendent of one of the Cemeteries should have, as 

determined by the Secretary of the Army— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
146 

‘‘(1) experience in the administration, management, and operation of cemeteries under the jurisdiction of the National 

Cemeteries System administered by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs; or 

‘‘(2) experience in the administration, management, and operation of large civilian cemeteries equivalent to the experience 

described in paragraph (1). 

‘‘(b) DUTIES.—The superintendents of the Cemeteries report directly to the Executive Director and performs such duties and responsibilities as the Executive Director prescribes. 

‘‘§ 4726. Oversight and inspections 

‘‘(a) INSPECTIONS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

provide for the oversight of the Cemeteries to ensure the highest 

quality standards are maintained by providing for the periodic inspection of the administration, operation and maintenance, and construction elements applicable to the Cemeteries. The inspections 

shall be conducted by personnel of the Department of the Army with 

the assistance, as the Secretary considers appropriate, of personnel 

from other Federal agencies and civilian experts. 

‘‘(b) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 120 days after 

the completion of an inspection conducted under subsection (a), the 

Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report containing the results of the inspection and recommendations and a plan for corrective actions to be taken in response to the inspection.’’. 

(2) TABLE OF CHAPTERS.—The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle B of such title and at the beginning of part 

IV of such subtitle are amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 445 the following new item: 

‘‘446. Army National Military Cemeteries ............................................................ 4721’’. 

(b) DIGITIZATION OF ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY INTERMENT AND INURNMENT RECORDS.— 

(1) DEADLINE FOR CONVERSION AND USE.—Not later than 

June 1, 2012, all records related to interments and inurnments 

at Arlington National Cemetery shall be converted to a digitized 

format. Thereafter, use of the digitized format shall be the 

method by which all subsequent records related to interments 

and inurnments at Arlington National Cemetery are preserved 

and utilized. 

(2) DIGITIZED FORMAT DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘‘digitized format’’ refers to the use of an electronic database for recordkeeping and includes the full accounting of all 

records of each specific gravesite and niche location at Arlington National Cemetery and the identification of the individual 

interred or inurned at each specific gravesite and niche location. 

(c) ADDITIONAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENT.—During fiscal years 

2013 and 2015, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

shall conduct an inspection of— 

(1) Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia; 

and 

(2) the United States Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery in the District of Colombia. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
147 

SEC. 592. INSPECTION OF MILITARY CEMETERIES UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS. 

(a) INSPECTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRED.—The Inspector General of each military department shall conduct an inspection of each military cemetery under the jurisdiction of that 

military department and, based on the findings of those inspections, 

make recommendations for the regulation, management, oversight, 

and operation of the military cemeteries. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF INSPECTION.—The inspection of military 

cemeteries conducted by the Inspector General of a military department under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following: 

(1) The adequacy of the statutes, policies, and regulations 

governing the management, oversight, operations, and interments or inurnments (or both) by the military cemeteries under 

the jurisdiction of that military department and the adherence 

of such military cemeteries to such statutes, policies, and regulations. 

(2) The system employed to fully account for and accurately 

identify the remains interred or inurned in such military cemeteries. 

(3) The contracts and contracting processes and oversight of 

those contracts and processes with regard to compliance with 

Department of Defense and military department guidelines. 

(4) The history and adequacy of the oversight conducted by 

the Secretary of the military department over such military 

cemeteries and the adequacy of corrective actions taken as a result of that oversight. 

(5) The statutory and policy guidance governing the authorization for the Secretary of the military department to operate 

such military cemeteries and an assessment of the budget and 

appropriations structure and history of such military cemeteries. 

(6) Such other matters as the Inspector General considers 

to be appropriate. 

(c) INSPECTION OF ADDITIONAL CEMETERIES.— 

(1) INSPECTION REQUIRED.—In addition to the inspections 

required by subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct an inspection of a statistically 

valid sample of cemeteries located at current or former military 

installations inside and outside the United States that are 

under the jurisdiction of the military departments for the purpose of obtaining an assessment of the adequacy of and adherence to the statutes, policies, and regulations governing the 

management, oversight, operations, and interments or 

inurnments (or both) by those cemeteries. 

(2) EXCLUSION.—Paragraph (1) does not apply to the cemeteries maintained by the American Battle Monuments Commission and the military cemeteries identified in subsection (e). 

(d) SUBMISSION OF INSPECTION RESULTS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS.— 

(1) MILITARY CEMETERY INSPECTIONS.—Not later than May 

15, 2012, the Secretaries of the military departments shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a report containing— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
148 

(A) the findings of the inspections of the military cemeteries conducted under subsection (a); 

(B) the recommendations of the Inspectors General of 

the military departments based on such inspections; and 

(C) a plan for corrective action. 

(2) INSPECTION OF ADDITIONAL CEMETERIES.—Not later 

than December 31, 2012, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 

containing the findings of the inspections conducted under subsection (c) and the recommendations of the Inspector General 

based on such inspections. Not later than April 1, 2013, the 

Secretaries of the military departments shall submit to such 

committees a plan for corrective action. 

(e) MILITARY CEMETERY DEFINED.—In subsections (a) and (b), 

the term ‘‘military cemetery’’ means the cemeteries that are under 

the jurisdiction of a Secretary of a military department at the following locations: 

(1) The United States Military Academy. 

(2) The United States Naval Academy. 

(3) The United States Air Force Academy. 

SEC. 593. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED SERVICE CROSS FOR CAPTAIN FREDRICK L. SPAULDING FOR 

ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations 

specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other 

time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to 

persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army 

is authorized to award the Distinguished Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to Captain Fredrick L. Spaulding for acts of 

valor during the Vietnam War described in subsection (b). 

(b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in subsection (a) are the actions of Fredrick L. Spaulding, on July 

23, 1970, as a member of the United States Army serving in the 

grade of Captain in the Republic of Vietnam while assigned with 

Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3d Brigade, 101st Airborne Division. 

SEC. 594. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF 

HONOR TO EMIL KAPAUN FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING 

THE KOREAN WAR. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations 

specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other 

time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to 

persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized 

and requested to award the Medal of Honor posthumously under 

section 3741 of such title to Emil Kapaun for the acts of valor during the Korean War described in subsection (b). 

(b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in subsection (a) are the actions of then Captain Emil Kapaun as 

a member of the 8th Cavalry Regiment during the Battle of Unsan 

on November 1 and 2, 1950, and while a prisoner of war until his 

death on May 23, 1951, during the Korean War. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
149 

SEC. 595. REVIEW REGARDING AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO JEWISH AMERICAN WORLD WAR I VETERANS. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy shall review the service of each Jewish American 

World War I veteran described in subsection (b) to determine whether such veteran should be posthumously awarded the Medal of 

Honor. 

(b) COVERED JEWISH AMERICAN WAR VETERANS.—The Jewish 

American World War I veterans whose service is to be reviewed 

under subsection (a) are any Jewish American World War I veterans awarded the Distinguished Service Cross or the Navy Cross 

for heroism during World War I and whose name and supporting 

material for upgrade of the award are submitted to the Secretary 

concerned for such purpose before the end of the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(c) RECOMMENDATION BASED ON REVIEW.—If the Secretary concerned determines, based upon the review under subsection (a) that 

the award of the Medal of Honor to a veteran is warranted, the Secretary shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a recommendation 

that the Medal of Honor be awarded posthumously to the veteran. 

(d) WORLD WAR I DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘World 

War I’’ means the period beginning on April 6, 1917, and ending 

on November 11, 1918. 

SEC. 596. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR EXPEDITED DETERMINATION OF 

DISABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH 

CERTAIN DISABLING CONDITIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of the establishment by the military departments of a process 

to expedite the determination of disability with respect to members 

of the Armed Forces, including regular members and members of 

the reserve components, who suffer from certain disabling diseases 

or conditions. If the establishment of such a process is considered 

feasible and advisable, the report shall set forth such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate for the establishment of such process. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORT.— 

(1) EVALUATION OF APPROPRIATE ELEMENTS OF SIMILAR

FEDERAL PROGRAMS.—In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall evaluate elements of 

programs for expedited determinations of disability that are 

currently carried out by other departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, including the Quick Disability Determination program and the Compassionate Allowances program of 

the Social Security Administration. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

the study in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

SEC. 597. COMPTROLLER GENERAL STUDY OF MILITARY NECESSITY 

OF SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM AND ALTERNATIVES. 

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall conduct a study— 

(1) to assess the necessity of the Selective Service System to 

the Department of Defense in meeting future military manpower 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
150 

requirements that are in excess of the ability of the all-volunteer 

force; and 

(2) to determine the fiscal and national security impacts 

of— 

(A) disestablishing the Selective Service System; 

(B) putting the Selective Service System into a deep 

standby mode, defined as retaining only personnel sufficient to conduct necessary functions, to include maintaining 

the registration database; and 

(C) requiring the Department of Defense, or other Federal department, upon disestablishment of the Selective 

Service System and repeal of registration requirements, to 

assume responsibility for securing the Selective Service System registration data bases, and keeping them updated. 

(b) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH OPTION.—As part 

of considering the impacts of disestablishment of the Selective Service System, putting it into a deep standby mode, or transferring responsibilities as described in subsection (a)(2)(C), the Comptroller 

General shall provide for each option— 

(1) an estimate of the annual cost or savings of each option 

to the Federal government; and 

(2) the feasibility, cost, and time required for each option— 

(A) to reestablish the capability to meet the Selective 

Service System mission, as it existed before disestablishment; and 

(B) to provide the Department of Defense the required 

number of conscripts for training, should conscription be 

authorized by Congress. 

(c) SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING REGISTRATION.—The 

study shall also include an assessment of the feasibility, cost, and 

time required to meet registration requirements by— 

(1) using existing Federal and State government institutions as an alternative to Selective Service registration to maintain an accurate, comprehensive database of Americans who, 

according to existing Selective Service System registration requirements, would be subject to conscription should conscription be authorized; and 

(2) integrating various alternative registration databases 

for use in connection with conscription and provide a means to 

keep updated and accurate the Selective Service System database under each of the options described in subsection (a)(2). 

(d) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than May 1, 2012, the 

Comptroller General shall submit the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing 

the results of the study. 

SEC. 598. EVALUATION OF ISSUES AFFECTING DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF AMERICAN SAILORS KILLED IN THE EXPLOSION 

OF THE KETCH U.S.S. INTREPID IN TRIPOLI HARBOR ON 

SEPTEMBER 4, 1804. 

(a) EVALUATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of the Navy shall conduct an evaluation of the following 

issues with respect to the disposition of the remains of American 

sailors killed in the explosion of the ketch U.S.S. Intrepid in Tripoli 

Harbor on September 4, 1804: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
151 

(1) The feasibility of recovery of the remains based on historical information, factual considerations, costs, and precedential effect. 

(2) The ability to make identifications of the remains within a two-year period based on conditions and facts that would 

have to exist for positive scientific identification of the remains. 

(3) The diplomatic and inter-governmental issues that 

would have to be addressed in order to provide for exhuming 

and removing the remains consistent with the sovereignty of the 

Libyan government. 

(b) PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct the evaluation 

under subsection (a) with the participation of the Defense POW/ 

Missing Personnel Office and the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command and in consultation with the Secretary of State. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF RECOMMENDATION.—Upon completion of the 

evaluation as required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 

and the Secretary of State shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives their recommendation regarding the proposal to exhume, identify, and relocate the remains of the American sailors referred to in such subsection and the reasons supporting their recommendation. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL 

BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Resumption of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. 

Sec. 602. Lodging accommodations for members assigned to duty in connection with 

commissioning or fitting out of a ship. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve 

forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. 

Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. 

Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 

Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. 

Sec. 616. Modification of qualifying period for payment of hostile fire and imminent 

danger special pay and hazardous duty special pay. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Generally 

Sec. 621. One-year extension of authority to reimburse travel expenses for inactiveduty training outside of normal commuting distance. 

Subtitle D—Consolidation and Reform of Travel and Transportation Authorities 

Sec. 631. Consolidation and reform of travel and transportation authorities of the 

uniformed services. 

Sec. 632. Transition provisions. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Discretion of the Secretary of the Navy to select categories of merchandise 

to be sold by ship stores afloat. 

Sec. 642. Access of military exchange stores system to credit available through Federal Financing Bank. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
152 

Sec. 643. Designation of Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and Meditation 

Pavilion, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, as a Fisher House. 

Subtitle F—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 651. Death gratuity and related benefits for Reserves who die during an authorized stay at their residence during or between successive days of inactive 

duty training. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Sec. 661. Report on basic allowance for housing for National Guard members 

transitioning between active duty and full-time National Guard duty. 

Sec. 662. Report on incentives for recruitment and retention of health care professionals. 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

SEC. 601. RESUMPTION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 

UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. 

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 

SEC. 602. LODGING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR MEMBERS ASSIGNED TO 

DUTY IN CONNECTION WITH COMMISSIONING OR FITTING 

OUT OF A SHIP. 

(a) EXTENSION TO PRECOMMISSIONING UNIT SAILORS.—Subsection (a) of section 7572 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘or assigned to duty in connection with 

commissioning or fitting out of a ship’’ after ‘‘sea duty’’; and 

(2) by inserting ‘‘, because the ship is under construction 

and is not yet habitable,’’ after ‘‘because of repairs,’’. 

(b) EXTENSION TO ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Subsection (d) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘After the expiration of the authority 

provided in subsection (b), an officer’’ and inserting ‘‘A 

member’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘officer’s quarters’’ and inserting ‘‘member’s quarters’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘obtaining quarters’’ and inserting ‘‘obtaining housing’’; and 

(D) by striking ‘‘the officer’’ and inserting ‘‘the member’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘an officer’’ both places it appears and 

inserting ‘‘a member’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘quarters’’ and inserting ‘‘housing’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘officer’s grade’’ and inserting ‘‘member’s grade’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘an officer’’ and inserting ‘‘a member’’; 

and 

(B) by striking ‘‘quarters’’ and inserting ‘‘housing’’. 

(c) SHIPYARDS AFFECTED BY BRAC 2005.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e)(1) The Secretary may reimburse a member of the naval 

service assigned to duty in connection with commissioning or fitting 

out of a ship in Pascagoula, Mississippi, or Bath, Maine, who is deVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00182 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
153 

prived of quarters on board a ship because the ship is under construction and is not yet habitable, or because of other conditions 

that make the member’s quarters uninhabitable, for expenses incurred in obtaining housing, but only when the Navy is unable to 

furnish the member with lodging accommodations under subsection 

(a). 

‘‘(2) The total amount that a member may be reimbursed under 

this subsection may not exceed an amount equal to the basic allowance for housing of a member without dependents of that member’s 

grade. 

‘‘(3) A member without dependents, or a member who resides 

with dependents while assigned to duty in connection with commissioning or fitting out of a ship at one of the locations specified in 

paragraph (1), may not be reimbursed under this subsection. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary may prescribe regulations to carry out this 

subsection.’’. 

(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 7572. Quarters: accommodations in place for members on 

sea duty or assigned to duty in connection with 

commissioning or fitting out of a ship’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 649 of such title is amended by striking the 

item relating to section 7572 and inserting the following new 

item: 

‘‘7572. Quarters: accommodations in place for members on sea duty or assigned to 

duty in connection with commissioning or fitting out of a ship.’’. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus. 

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation 

or enlistment bonus. 

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted 

members assigned to certain high-priority units. 

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 

bonus for persons without prior service. 

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 

and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment 

and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 

(7) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 

for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
154 

SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

(a) TITLE 10 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 10, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate 

accession program. 

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education 

loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected 

Reserve. 

(b) TITLE 37 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 37, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists. 

(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. 

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for 

nurse anesthetists. 

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. 

(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers. 

(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers. 

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical 

officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental 

specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service. 

(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession 

bonus. 

(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 

SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 

37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 

BONUS AUTHORITIES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for 

enlisted members. 

(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for 

officers. 

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for nuclear officers. 

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay 

and bonus authorities for officers. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
155 

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for officers in health professions. 

(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. 

(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special 

duty pay. 

(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. 

(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. 

SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL PAYS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2012’’: 

(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 

bonus. 

(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. 

(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active 

members. 

(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. 

(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills. 

(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion 

to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. 

(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer 

between armed forces. 

(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer 

candidates. 

SEC. 616. MODIFICATION OF QUALIFYING PERIOD FOR PAYMENT OF 

HOSTILE FIRE AND IMMINENT DANGER SPECIAL PAY AND 

HAZARDOUS DUTY SPECIAL PAY. 

(a) HOSTILE FIRE AND IMMINENT DANGER PAY.—Section 310 of 

title 37, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for any month or portion 

of a month’’ and inserting ‘‘for any day or portion of a day’’; 

(2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following 

new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) SPECIAL PAY AMOUNT.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amount of special pay authorized by subsection (a) for 

a day or portion of a day shall be the amount equal to 1/30th of 

the monthly amount of basic pay or compensation payable to the 

member for the month in which the exposure occurs. 

‘‘(2) In the case of a member who is exposed to hostile fire or 

a hostile mine explosion event in or for a day or portion of a day, 

the Secretary concerned may, at the election of the Secretary, pay 

the member special pay under subsection (a) in an amount not to 

exceed the amount that would be payable to the member under 

paragraph (1) for 30 days of exposure. The total amount paid a 

member under this paragraph in any month may not exceed the 

amount that would be payable under paragraph (1) for 30 days of 

exposure.’’; 

(3) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘for any day (or portion 

of a day) of’’ before ‘‘not more than three additional months’’; 

and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
156 

(4) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘‘any month’’ and inserting ‘‘any day’’. 

(b) HAZARDOUS DUTY PAY.—Section 351(c)(2) of such title is 

amended by striking ‘‘receipt of hazardous duty pay,’’ and all that 

follows and inserting ‘‘receipt of hazardous duty pay— 

‘‘(A) in the case of hazardous duty pay payable under 

paragraph (1) of subsection (a), the Secretary concerned— 

‘‘(i) shall prorate the payment amount to reflect the 

duration of the member’s actual qualifying service during the month; or 

‘‘(ii) in the case of a member who is exposed to hostile fire or an explosion of a hostile explosive device in 

or for a day or portion of a day, may, at the election 

of the Secretary, pay the member hazardous duty pay 

in an amount not to exceed the entire amount of hazardous duty pay that would be payable to the member 

under such paragraph (1) for the month in which the 

duty concerned occurs (with the total amount of hazardous duty pay paid the member under this clause in 

any given month not to exceed such entire amount); 

and 

‘‘(B) in the case of hazardous duty pay payable under 

paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a), the Secretary concerned may prorate the payment amount to reflect the duration of the member’s actual qualifying service during the 

month.’’. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Generally 

SEC. 621. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR INACTIVE-DUTY TRAINING OUTSIDE OF 

NORMAL COMMUTING DISTANCE. 

Section 408a(e) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 

Subtitle D—Consolidation and Reform of Travel and 

Transportation Authorities 

SEC. 631. CONSOLIDATION AND REFORM OF TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

(a) PURPOSE.—This section establishes general travel and transportation provisions for members of the uniformed services and 

other travelers authorized to travel under official conditions. Recognizing the complexities and the changing nature of travel, the 

amendments made by this section provide the Secretary of Defense 

and the other administering Secretaries with the authority to prescribe and implement travel and transportation policy that is simple, clear, efficient, and flexible, and that meets mission and servicemember needs, while realizing cost savings that should come with 

a more efficient and less cumbersome system for travel and transportation. 

(b) CONSOLIDATED AUTHORITIES.—Title 37, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after chapter 7 the following new chapter: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
157 

‘‘CHAPTER 8—TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION 

ALLOWANCES 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER I—TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES—NEW LAW

‘‘451. Definitions. 

‘‘452. Allowable travel and transportation: general authorities. 

‘‘453. Allowable travel and transportation: specific authorities. 

‘‘454. Travel and transportation: pilot programs. 

‘‘455. Appropriations for travel: may not be used for attendance at certain meetings. 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

‘‘461. Relationship to other travel and transportation authorities. 

‘‘462. Travel and transportation allowances paid to members that are unauthorized 

or in excess of authorized amounts: requirement for repayment. 

‘‘463. Program of compliance; electronic processing of travel claims. 

‘‘464. Regulations. 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER III—TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES—OLD LAW

‘‘471. Travel authorities transition expiration date. 

‘‘472. Definitions and other incorporated provisions of chapter 7. 

‘‘474. Travel and transportation allowances: general. 

‘‘474a. Travel and transportation allowances: temporary lodging expenses. 

‘‘474b. Travel and transportation allowances: payment of lodging expenses at temporary duty location during authorized absence of member. 

‘‘475. Travel and transportation allowances: per diem while on duty outside the continental United States. 

‘‘475a. Travel and transportation allowances: departure allowances. 

‘‘476. Travel and transportation allowances: dependents; baggage and household effects. 

‘‘476a. Travel and transportation allowances: authorized for travel performed under 

orders that are canceled, revoked, or modified. 

‘‘476b. Travel and transportation allowances: members of the uniformed services attached to a ship overhauling or inactivating. 

‘‘476c. Travel and transportation allowances: members assigned to a vessel under 

construction. 

‘‘477. Travel and transportation allowances: dislocation allowance. 

‘‘478. Travel and transportation allowances: travel within limits of duty station. 

‘‘478a. Travel and transportation allowances: inactive duty training outside of the 

normal commuting distances. 

‘‘479. Travel and transportation allowances: house trailers and mobile homes. 

‘‘480. Travel and transportation allowances: miscellaneous categories. 

‘‘481. Travel and transportation allowances: administrative provisions. 

‘‘481a. Travel and transportation allowances: travel performed in connection with 

convalescent leave. 

‘‘481b. Travel and transportation allowances: travel performed in connection with 

leave between consecutive overseas tours. 

‘‘481c. Travel and transportation allowances: travel performed in connection with 

rest and recuperative leave from certain stations in foreign countries. 

‘‘481d. Travel and transportation allowances: transportation incident to personal 

emergencies for certain members and dependents. 

‘‘481e. Travel and transportation allowances: transportation incident to certain emergencies for members performing temporary duty. 

‘‘481f. Travel and transportation allowances: transportation for survivors of deceased 

member to attend the member’s burial ceremonies. 

‘‘481h. Travel and transportation allowances: transportation of designated individuals incident to hospitalization of members for treatment of wounds, illness, or injury. 

‘‘481i. Travel and transportation allowances: parking expenses. 

‘‘481j. Travel and transportation allowances: transportation of family members incident to the repatriation of members held captive. 

‘‘481k. Travel and transportation allowances: non-medical attendants for members 

determined to be very seriously or seriously wounded, ill, or injured. 

‘‘481l. Travel and transportation allowances: attendance of members and others at 

Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
158 

‘‘484. Travel and transportation: dependents of members in a missing status; household and personal effects; trailers; additional movements; motor vehicles; sale of bulky items; claims for proceeds; appropriation chargeable. 

‘‘488. Allowance for recruiting expenses. 

‘‘489. Travel and transportation allowances: minor dependent schooling. 

‘‘490. Travel and transportation: dependent children of members stationed overseas. 

‘‘491. Benefits for certain members assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency. 

‘‘492. Travel and transportation: members escorting certain dependents. 

‘‘494. Subsistence reimbursement relating to escorts of foreign arms control inspection 

teams. 

‘‘495. Funeral honors duty: allowance. 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER I—TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITIES—NEW LAW 

‘‘§ 451. Definitions 

‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS RELATING TO PERSONS.—In this subchapter 

and subchapter II: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘administering Secretary’ or ‘administering 

Secretaries’ means the following: 

‘‘(A) The Secretary of Defense, with respect to the 

armed forces (including the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Navy). 

‘‘(B) The Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect 

to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in 

the Navy. 

‘‘(C) The Secretary of Commerce, with respect to the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

‘‘(D) The Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

with respect to the Public Health Service. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘authorized traveler’ means a person who is 

authorized travel and transportation allowances when performing official travel ordered or authorized by the administering Secretary. Such term includes the following: 

‘‘(A) A member of the uniformed services. 

‘‘(B) A family member of a member of the uniformed 

services. 

‘‘(C) A person acting as an escort or attendant for a 

member or family member who is traveling on official travel or is traveling with the remains of a deceased member. 

‘‘(D) A person who participates in a military funeral 

honors detail. 

‘‘(E) A Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps cadet or 

midshipman. 

‘‘(F) An applicant or rejected applicant for enlistment. 

‘‘(G) Any person whose employment or service is considered directly related to a Government official activity or 

function under regulations prescribed under section 464 of 

this title. 

‘‘(H) Any other person not covered by subparagraphs 

(A) through (G) who is determined by the administering 

Secretary pursuant to regulations prescribed under section 

464 of this title as warranting the provision of travel benefits for purposes of the following: 

‘‘(i) Transportation of survivors to attend burial 

services or transfer of deceased members after death 

overseas as provided in section 481f of this title. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
159 

‘‘(ii) Transportation of designated individuals incident to the hospitalization of members as provided in 

section 481h of this title. 

‘‘(iii) Transportation of designated individuals incident to the repatriation of members as provided in 

section 481j of this title. 

‘‘(iv) Transportation of non-medical attendants as 

provided in section 481k of this title. 

‘‘(v) Transportation of designated individuals to attend Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events as 

provided in section 481l of this title. 

‘‘(vi) Transportation of a person with regard to a 

single event when the administering Secretary determines that the travel is necessary to ensure fairness 

and equity, respond to emergency or humanitarian circumstances, or serve the best interests of the Government. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘family member’, with respect to a member of 

the uniformed services, means the following: 

‘‘(A) A dependent, as defined in section 401(a) of this 

title. 

‘‘(B) A child, as defined in section 401(b)(1) of this title. 

‘‘(C) A parent, as defined in section 401(b)(2) of this 

title. 

‘‘(D) A sibling of the member. 

‘‘(E) A former spouse of the member. 

‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS RELATING TO TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION

ALLOWANCES.—In this subchapter and subchapter II: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘official travel’ means the following: 

‘‘(A) Military duty or official business performed by an 

authorized traveler away from a duty assignment location 

or other authorized location. 

‘‘(B) Travel performed by an authorized traveler ordered to relocate from a permanent duty station to another 

permanent duty station. 

‘‘(C) Travel performed by an authorized traveler ordered to the first permanent duty station, or separated or 

retired from uniformed service. 

‘‘(D) Local travel in or around the temporary duty or 

permanent duty station. 

‘‘(E) Other travel as authorized or ordered by the administering Secretary. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘actual and necessary expenses’ means expenses incurred in fact by an authorized traveler as a reasonable consequence of official travel. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘travel allowances’ means the daily lodging, 

meals, and other related expenses, including relocation expenses, incurred by an authorized traveler while on official 

travel. 

‘‘(4) The term ‘transportation allowances’ means the costs of 

temporarily or permanently moving an authorized traveler, the 

personal property of an authorized traveler, or a combination 

thereof. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
160 

‘‘(5) The term ‘transportation-, lodging-, or meals-in-kind’ 

means transportation, lodging, or meals provided by the Government without cost to an authorized traveler. 

‘‘(6) The term ‘miscellaneous expenses’ means authorized expenses incurred in addition to authorized allowances during the 

performance of official travel by an authorized traveler. 

‘‘(7) The term ‘personal property’, with respect to transportation allowances, includes baggage, furniture, and other household items, clothing, privately owned vehicles, house trailers, 

mobile homes, and any other personal items that would not otherwise be prohibited by any other provision of law or regulation 

prescribed under section 464 of this title. 

‘‘(8) The term ‘relocation allowances’ means the costs associated with relocating a member of the uniformed services and 

the member’s dependents between an old and new temporary or 

permanent duty assignment location or other authorized location. 

‘‘(9) The term ‘dislocation allowances’ means the costs associated with relocation of the household of a member of the uniformed services and the member’s dependents in relation to a 

change in the member’s permanent duty assignment location ordered for the convenience of the Government or incident to an 

evacuation. 

‘‘§ 452. Allowable travel and transportation: general authorities 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise prohibited by law, a 

member of the uniformed services or other authorized traveler may 

be provided transportation-, lodging-, or meals-in-kind, or actual 

and necessary expenses of travel and transportation, for, or in connection with, official travel under circumstances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of this title. 

‘‘(b) SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES.—The authority under subsection 

(a) includes travel under or in connection with, but not limited to, 

the following circumstances, to the extent specified in regulations 

prescribed under section 464 of this title: 

‘‘(1) Temporary duty that requires travel between a permanent duty assignment location and another authorized temporary duty location, and travel in or around the temporary 

duty location. 

‘‘(2) Permanent change of station that requires travel between an old and new temporary or permanent duty assignment 

location or other authorized location. 

‘‘(3) Temporary duty or assignment relocation related to 

consecutive overseas tours or in-place-consecutive overseas tours. 

‘‘(4) Recruiting duties for the armed forces. 

‘‘(5) Assignment or detail to another Government department or agency. 

‘‘(6) Rest and recuperative leave. 

‘‘(7) Convalescent leave. 

‘‘(8) Reenlistment leave. 

‘‘(9) Reserve component inactive-duty training performed 

outside the normal commuting distance of the member’s permanent residence. 

‘‘(10) Ready Reserve muster duty. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
161 

‘‘(11) Unusual, extraordinary, hardship, or emergency circumstances. 

‘‘(12) Presence of family members at a military medical facility incident to the illness or injury of members. 

‘‘(13) Presence of family members at the repatriation of 

members held captive. 

‘‘(14) Presence of non-medical attendants for very seriously 

or seriously wounded, ill, or injured members. 

‘‘(15) Attendance at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program 

events. 

‘‘(16) Missing status, as determined by the Secretary concerned under chapter 10 of this title. 

‘‘(17) Attendance at or participation in international sports 

competitions described under section 717 of title 10. 

‘‘(c) MATTERS INCLUDED.—Travel and transportation allowances which may be provided under subsection (a) include the following: 

‘‘(1) Allowances for transportation, lodging, and meals. 

‘‘(2) Dislocation or relocation allowances paid in connection 

with a change in a member’s temporary or permanent duty assignment location. 

‘‘(3) Other related miscellaneous expenses. 

‘‘(d) MODE OF PROVIDING TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOW- ANCES.—Any authorized travel and transportation may be provided— 

‘‘(1) as an actual expense; 

‘‘(2) as an authorized allowance; 

‘‘(3) in-kind; or 

‘‘(4) using a combination of the authorities under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3). 

‘‘(e) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES WHEN TRAVEL

ORDERS ARE MODIFIED, ETC.—An authorized traveler whose travel 

and transportation order or authorization is canceled, revoked, or 

modified may be allowed actual and necessary expenses or travel 

and transportation allowances in connection with travel performed 

pursuant to such order or authorization. 

‘‘(f) ADVANCE PAYMENTS.—An authorized traveler may be allowed advance payments for authorized travel and transportation 

allowances. 

‘‘(g) RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNAUTHORIZED EXPENSES.—Any unauthorized travel or transportation expense is not the responsibility 

of the United States. 

‘‘(h) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AUTHORITIES.—The administering Secretary may not provide payment under this section for 

an expense for which payment may be provided from any other appropriate Government or non-Government entity. 

‘‘§ 453. Allowable travel and transportation: specific authorities 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any other authority for the 

provision of travel and transportation allowances, the administering 

Secretaries may provide travel and transportation allowances under 

this subchapter in accordance with this section. 

‘‘(b) AUTHORIZED ABSENCE FROM TEMPORARY DUTY LOCATION.—An authorized traveler may be paid travel and transporVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00191 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
162 

tation allowances, or reimbursed for actual and necessary expenses 

of travel, incurred at a temporary duty location during an authorized absence from that location. 

‘‘(c) MOVEMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.—(1) A member of a 

uniformed service may be allowed moving expenses and transportation allowances for self and dependents associated with the movement of personal property and household goods, including such expenses when associated with a self-move. 

‘‘(2) The authority in paragraph (1) includes the movement and 

temporary and non-temporary storage of personal property, household goods, and privately owned vehicles (but not to exceed one privately owned vehicle per member household) in connection with the 

temporary or permanent move between authorized locations. 

‘‘(3) For movement of household goods, the administering Secretaries shall prescribe weight allowances in regulations under section 

464 of this title. The prescribed weight allowances may not exceed 

18,000 pounds (including packing, crating, and household goods in 

temporary storage), except that the administering Secretary may, on 

a case-by-case basis, authorize additional weight allowances as necessary. 

‘‘(4) The administering Secretary may prescribe the terms, rates, 

and conditions that authorize a member of the uniformed services 

to ship or store a privately owned vehicle. 

‘‘(5) No carrier, port agent, warehouseman, freight forwarder, or 

other person involved in the transportation of property may have 

any lien on, or hold, impound, or otherwise interfere with, the movement of baggage and household goods being transported under this 

section. 

‘‘(d) UNUSUAL OR EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES.—An authorized 

traveler may be provided travel and transportation allowances 

under this section for unusual, extraordinary, hardship, or emergency circumstances, including circumstances warranting evacuation from a permanent duty assignment location. 

‘‘(e) PARTICULAR SEPARATION PROVISIONS.—The administering 

Secretary may provide travel-in-kind and transportation-in-kind for 

the following persons in accordance with regulations prescribed 

under section 464 of this title: 

‘‘(1) A member who is retired, or is placed on the temporary 

disability retired list, under chapter 61 of title 10. 

‘‘(2) A member who is retired with pay under any other law 

or who, immediately following at least eight years of continuous 

active duty with no single break therein of more than 90 days, 

is discharged with separation pay or is involuntarily released 

from active duty with separation pay or readjustment pay. 

‘‘(3) A member who is discharged under section 1173 of title 

10. 

‘‘(f) ATTENDANCE AT MEMORIAL CEREMONIES AND SERVICES.— 

A family member or member of the uniformed services who attends 

a deceased member’s repatriation, burial, or memorial ceremony or 

service may be provided travel and transportation allowances to the 

extent provided in regulations prescribed under section 464 of this 

title. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
163 

‘‘§ 454. Travel and transportation: pilot programs 

‘‘(a) PILOT PROGRAMS.—Except as otherwise prohibited by law, 

the Secretary of Defense may conduct pilot programs to evaluate alternative travel and transportation programs, policies, and processes for Department of Defense authorized travelers. Any such pilot 

program shall be designed to enhance cost savings or other efficiencies that accrue to the Government and be conducted so as to 

evaluate one or more of the following: 

‘‘(1) Alternative methods for performing and reimbursing 

travel. 

‘‘(2) Means for limiting the need for travel. 

‘‘(3) Means for reducing the environmental impact of travel. 

‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) Not more than three pilot programs may 

be carried out under subsection (a) at any one time. 

‘‘(2) The duration of a pilot program may not exceed four years. 

‘‘(3) The authority to carry out a pilot program is subject to the 

availability of appropriated funds. 

‘‘(c) REPORTS.—(1) Not later than 30 days before the commencement of a pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot 

program. The report on a pilot program under this paragraph shall 

set forth a description of the pilot program, including the following: 

‘‘(A) The purpose of the pilot program. 

‘‘(B) The duration of the pilot program. 

‘‘(C) The cost savings or other efficiencies anticipated to accrue to the Government under the pilot program. 

‘‘(2) Not later than 60 days after the completion of a pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. The report on a pilot program 

under this paragraph shall set forth the following: 

‘‘(A) A description of results of the pilot program. 

‘‘(B) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the 

pilot program. 

‘‘(d) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘congressional defense committees’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10. 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 

‘‘§ 461. Relationship to other travel and transportation authorities 

‘‘An authorized traveler may not be paid travel and transportation allowances or receive travel-in-kind and transportation-inkind, or a combination thereof, under both subchapter I and subchapter III for official travel performed under a single or related 

travel and transportation order or authorization by the administering Secretary. 

‘‘§ 462. Travel and transportation allowances paid to members that are unauthorized or in excess of authorized amounts: requirement for repayment 

‘‘(a) REPAYMENT REQUIRED.—Except as provided in subsection 

(b), a member of the uniformed services or other person who is paid 

travel and transportation allowances under subchapter I shall 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
164 

repay to the United States any amount of such payment that is determined to be unauthorized or in excess of the applicable authorized amount. 

‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—The regulations prescribed under section 464 

of this title shall specify procedures for determining the circumstances under which an exception to repayment otherwise required by subsection (a) may be granted. 

‘‘(c) EFFECT OF BANKRUPTCY.—An obligation to repay the 

United States under this section is, for all purposes, a debt owed the 

United States. A discharge in bankruptcy under title 11 does not 

discharge a person from such debt if the discharge order is entered 

less than five years after the date on which the debt was incurred. 

‘‘§ 463. Programs of compliance; electronic processing of travel claims 

‘‘(a) PROGRAMS OF COMPLIANCE.—The administering Secretaries shall provide for compliance with the requirements of this 

chapter through programs of compliance established and maintained for that purpose. 

‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The programs of compliance under subsection 

(a) shall— 

‘‘(1) minimize the provision of benefits under this chapter 

based on inaccurate claims, unauthorized claims, overstated or 

inflated claims, and multiple claims for the same benefits 

through the electronic verification of travel claims on a neartime basis and such other means as the administering Secretaries may establish for purposes of the programs of compliance; and 

‘‘(2) ensure that benefits provided under this chapter do not 

exceed reasonable or actual and necessary expenses of travel 

claimed or reasonable allowances based on commercial travel 

rates. 

‘‘(c) ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF TRAVEL CLAIMS.—(1) By not 

later than the date that is five years after the date of the enactment 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, any 

travel claim under this chapter shall be processed electronically. 

‘‘(2) The administering Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, 

may waive the requirement in paragraph (1) with respect to a particular claim in the interests of the department concerned. 

‘‘(3) The electronic processing of claims under this subsection 

shall be subject to the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense under section 464 of this title which shall apply uniformly to 

all members of the uniformed services and, to the extent practicable, 

to all other authorized travelers. 

‘‘§ 464. Regulations 

‘‘This subchapter and subchapter I shall be administered under 

terms, rates, conditions, and regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

of Defense in consultation with the other administering Secretaries 

for members of the uniformed services. Such regulations shall be 

uniform for the Department of Defense and shall apply as uniformly 

as practicable to the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the 

other administering Secretaries. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
165 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER III—TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITIES—OLD LAW 

‘‘§ 471. Travel authorities transition expiration date 

‘‘In this subchapter, the term ‘travel authorities transition expiration date’ means the last day of the 10-year period beginning on 

the first day of the first month beginning after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012. 

‘‘§ 472. Definitions and other incorporated provisions of chapter 7 

‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—The provisions of section 401 of this title 

apply to this subchapter. 

‘‘(b) OTHER PROVISIONS.—The provisions of sections 421 and 

423 of this title apply to this subchapter.’’. 

(c) REPEAL OF OBSOLETE AUTHORITY.—Section 411g of title 37, 

United States Code, is repealed. 

(d) TRANSFER OF SECTIONS.— (1) TRANSFER TO SUBCHAPTER I.—Section 412 of title 37, 

United States Code, is transferred to chapter 8 of such title, as 

added by subsection (b), inserted after section 454, and redesignated as section 455. 

(2) TRANSFER OF CURRENT CHAPTER 7 AUTHORITIES TO SUB- CHAPTER III.—Sections 404, 404a, 404b, 405, 405a, 406, 406a, 

406b, 406c, 407, 408, 408a, 409, 410, 411, 411a through 411f, 

411h through 411l, 428 through 432, 434, and 435 of such title 

are transferred (in that order) to chapter 8 of such title, as 

added by subsection (b), inserted after section 472, and redesignated as follows: 

Section: Redesignated Section: 

404 474 

404a 474a 

404b 474b 

405 475 

405a 475a 

406 476 

406a 476a 

406b 476b 

406c 476c 

407 477 

408 478 

408a 478a 

409 479 

410 480 

411 481 

411a 481a 

411b 481b 

411c 481c 

411d 481d 

411e 481e 

411f 481f 

411h 481h 

411i 481i 

411j 481j 

411k 481k 

411l 481l 

428 488 

429 489 

430 490 

432 492 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
166 

434 494 

435 495 

(3) TRANSFER OF SECTION 554.—Section 554 of such title is 

transferred to chapter 8 of such title, as added by subsection 

(b), inserted after section 481l (as transferred and redesignated 

by paragraph (2)), and redesignated as section 484. 

(e) SUNSET OF OLD-LAW AUTHORITIES.—Provisions of subchapter III of chapter 8 of title 37, United States Code, as transferred and redesignated by paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c), 

are amended as follows: 

(1) Section 474 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(k) No travel and transportation allowance or reimbursement 

may be provided under this section for travel that begins after the 

travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(2) Section 474a is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—No payment or reimbursement may be provided under this section with respect to a change of permanent station for which orders are issued after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(3) Section 474b is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No payment or reimbursement may be provided under this section with respect to an authorized absence that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(4) Section 475 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—During and after the travel authorities expiration date, no per diem may be paid under this section for any 

period.’’. 

(5) Section 475a is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) During and after the travel authorities expiration date, no 

allowance under subsection (a) or transportation or reimbursement 

under subsection (b) may be provided with respect to an authority 

or order to depart.’’. 

(6) Section 476 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(n) No transportation, reimbursement, allowance, or per diem 

may be provided under this section— 

‘‘(1) with respect to a change of temporary or permanent 

station for which orders are issued after the travel authorities 

transition expiration date; or 

‘‘(2) in a case covered by this section when such orders are 

not issued, with respect to a movement of baggage or household 

effects that begins after such date.’’. 

(7) Section 476a is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—’’ before ‘‘Under uniform regulations’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) TERMINATION.—No transportation or travel or transportation allowance may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
167 

(8) Section 476b is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) No transportation or allowance may be provided under this 

section for travel that begins after the travel authorities transition 

expiration date.’’. 

(9) Section 476c is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No transportation or allowance may be provided under this section for travel that begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(10) Section 477 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(i) TERMINATION.—No dislocation allowance may be paid 

under this section for a move that begins after the travel authorities 

transition expiration date.’’. 

(11) Section 478 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No travel or transportation allowance, payment, or reimbursement may be provided under this section for travel that begins 

after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(12) Section 479 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) No transportation of a house trailer or mobile home, or 

storage or payment in connection therewith, may be provided under 

this section for transportation that begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(13) Section 480 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No travel or transportation allowance may be provided 

under this section for travel that begins after the travel authorities 

transition expiration date.’’. 

(14) Section 481 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) The regulations prescribed under this section shall cease to 

be in effect as of the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(15) Section 481a is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No travel and transportation allowance may be provided 

under this section for travel that is authorized after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(16) Section 481b is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—No travel and transportation allowance 

may be provided under this section for travel that is authorized 

after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(17) Section 481c is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No transportation may be provided under this section after 

the travel authorities transition expiration date, and no payment 

may be made under this section for transportation that begins after 

that date.’’. 

(18) Section 481d is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) No transportation may be provided under this section after 

the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
168 

(19) Section 481e is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No travel and transportation allowance or reimbursement 

may be provided under this section for travel that begins after the 

travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(20) Section 481f is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(h) TERMINATION.—No travel and transportation allowance or 

reimbursement may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(21) Section 481h is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No transportation, allowance, reimbursement, or per diem may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(22) Section 481i is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) TERMINATION.—No reimbursement may be provided under 

this section for expenses incurred after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(23) Section 481j is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No transportation, allowance, reimbursement, or per diem may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(24) Section 481k is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No transportation, allowance, reimbursement, or per diem may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(25) Section 481l is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—No transportation, allowance, reimbursement, or per diem may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(26) Section 484 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(k) No transportation, allowance, or reimbursement may be 

provided under this section for a move that begins after the travel 

authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(27) Section 488 is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—’’ before ‘‘In addition’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) TERMINATION.—No reimbursement may be provided under 

this section for expenses incurred after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(28) Section 489 is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—’’ before ‘‘In addition’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) TERMINATION.—No transportation or allowance may be 

provided under this section for travel that begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
169 

(29) Section 490 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) TERMINATION.—No transportation, allowance, reimbursement, or per diem may be provided under this section for travel that 

begins after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(30) Section 492 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) No transportation or allowance may be provided under this 

section for travel that begins after the travel authorities transition 

expiration date.’’. 

(31) Section 494 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—No reimbursement may be provided under 

this section for expenses incurred after the travel authorities transition expiration date.’’. 

(32) Section 495 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) TERMINATION.—No allowance may be paid under this section for any day after the travel authorities transition expiration 

date.’’. 

(f) TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) CHAPTER HEADING.—The heading of chapter 7 of such 

title is amended to read as follows: ‘‘CHAPTER 7—ALLOWANCES OTHER THAN TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES’’. 

(2) TABLE OF CHAPTERS.—The table of chapter preceding 

chapter 1 of such title is amended by striking the item relating 

to chapter 7 and inserting the following: 

‘‘7. Allowances Other Than Travel and Transportation Allowances .................. 401

‘‘8. Travel and Transportation Allowances .......................................................... 451’’. 

(3) TABLES OF SECTIONS.— 

(A) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 

of such title is amended by striking the items relating to 

sections 404 through 412, 428 through 432, 434, and 435. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 

of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 554. 

(4) CROSS-REFERENCES.— 

(A) Any section of title 10, 32, or 37, United States 

Code, that includes a reference to a section of title 37 that 

is transferred and redesignated by subsection (c) is amended so as to conform the reference to the section number of 

the section as so redesignated. 

(B) Any reference in a provision of law other than a 

section of title 10, 32, or 37, United States Code, to a section of title 37 that is transferred and redesignated by subsection (c) is deemed to refer to the section as so redesignated. 

SEC. 632. TRANSITION PROVISIONS. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to implement subchapters I and II of chapter 8 of title 

37, United States Code (as added by section 631(b) of this Act), and 

to transition all of the travel and transportation programs for members of the uniformed services under chapter 7 of title 37, United 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
170 

States Code, solely to provisions of those subchapters by the end of 

the transition period. 

(b) AUTHORITY FOR MODIFICATIONS TO OLD-LAW AUTHORITIES

DURING TRANSITION PERIOD.—During the transition period, the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries concerned, in using the authorities under subchapter III of chapter 8 of title 37, United States 

Code (as so added), may apply those authorities subject to the terms 

of such provisions and such modifications as the Secretary of Defense may include in the implementation plan required under subsection (a) or in any subsequent modification to that implementation 

plan. 

(c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare the 

implementation plan under subsection (a) and any modification to 

that plan under subsection (b) in coordination with— 

(1) the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the 

Coast Guard; 

(2) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, with respect to the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service; 

and 

(3) the Secretary of Commerce, with respect to the National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

(d) PROGRAM OF COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of Defense and 

the other administering Secretaries shall commence the operation of 

the programs of compliance required by section 463 of title 37, 

United States Code (as so added), by not later than one year after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(e) TRANSITION PERIOD.—In this section, the term ‘‘transition 

period’’ means the 10-year period beginning on the first day of the 

first month beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 

SEC. 641. DISCRETION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO SELECT 

CATEGORIES OF MERCHANDISE TO BE SOLD BY SHIP 

STORES AFLOAT. 

Section 7604(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘shall’’ and inserting ‘‘may’’. 

SEC. 642. ACCESS OF MILITARY EXCHANGE STORES SYSTEM TO CREDIT AVAILABLE THROUGH FEDERAL FINANCING BANK. 

Section 2487 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) ACCESS OF EXCHANGE STORES SYSTEM TO FEDERAL FINANCING BANK.—To facilitate the provision of in-store credit to patrons of the exchange stores system while reducing the costs of providing such credit, the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Navy 

Exchange Service Command, and Marine Corps exchanges may 

issue and sell their obligations to the Federal Financing Bank as 

provided in section 6 of the Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973 (12 

U.S.C. 2285).’’. 

SEC. 643. DESIGNATION OF FISHER HOUSE FOR THE FAMILIES OF THE 

FALLEN AND MEDITATION PAVILION, DOVER AIR FORCE 

BASE, DELAWARE, AS A FISHER HOUSE. 

The Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and Meditation 

Pavilion at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, is hereby designated as 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
171 

a Fisher House for purposes of section 2493 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

Subtitle F—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 

SEC. 651. DEATH GRATUITY AND RELATED BENEFITS FOR RESERVES 

WHO DIE DURING AN AUTHORIZED STAY AT THEIR RESIDENCE DURING OR BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE DAYS OF INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING. 

(a) DEATH GRATUITY.— (1) PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.—Section 1475(a)(3) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘or while staying at the Reserve’s residence, 

when so authorized by proper authority, during the period of 

such inactive duty training or between successive days of inactive duty training’’. 

(2) TREATMENT AS DEATH DURING INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING.—Section 1478(a) of such title is amended— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (8) as 

paragraphs (5) through (9), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 

paragraph (4): 

‘‘(4) A person covered by subsection (a)(3) of section 1475 of 

this title who died while on authorized stay at the person’s residence during a period of inactive duty training or between successive days of inactive duty training is considered to have been 

on inactive duty training on the date of his death.’’. 

(b) RECOVERY, CARE, AND DISPOSITION OF REMAINS AND RELATED BENEFITS.—Section 1481(a)(2) of such title is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) and (F) as subparagraphs (F) and (G), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new 

subparagraph (E): 

‘‘(E) staying at the member’s residence, when so authorized by proper authority, during a period of inactive duty 

training or between successive days of inactive duty training;’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

apply with respect to deaths that occur on or after that date. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

SEC. 661. REPORT ON BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FOR NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS TRANSITIONING BETWEEN ACTIVE DUTY AND FULL-TIME NATIONAL GUARD DUTY. 

(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on 

the implications for the monthly amount of basic allowance for 

housing of the transitions of members of the Army National Guard 

of the United States and Air National Guard of the United States 

as follows: 

(1) From active duty under title 10, United States Code, to 

full-time National Guard duty under title 32, United States 

Code. 

(2) From full-time National Guard duty under title 32, 

United States Code, to active duty under title 10, United States 

Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
172 

(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR STUDY.—In conducting the study required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

(1) take into account all potential variations of circumstance involving housing location, basic allowance for housing rates, duration of service, duration of break in service, and 

duty status; 

(2) take into account all current applicable policies, practices, and regulations; 

(3) assess potential modifications of policy and law, and develop recommendations for modifications of policy and law if 

determined appropriate; and 

(4) take into account the welfare of members of the Armed 

Forces and their families when developing recommendations, if 

any, under paragraph (3). 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than five months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the study required by subsection (a). 

The report shall set forth the results of the study, including a description of the manner in which each matter specified in subsection 

(b) was met, and include such comments and recommendations on 

the results of the study as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

SEC. 662. REPORT ON INCENTIVES FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Surgeons General of the Army, Navy, and Air Force shall 

submit to Congress a report on their staffing needs for health care 

professionals in the active and reserve components of the Armed 

Forces. Such report shall— 

(1) identify the positions in most critical need for additional health care professionals, including— 

(A) the number of physicians needed; and 

(B) whether additional behavioral health professionals 

are needed to treat members of the Armed Forces for post 

traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury; and 

(2) recommend incentives for healthcare professionals with 

more than 20 years of clinical experience to join the active or 

reserve components, including changes in age or length of service requirements to qualify for partial retired pay for non-regular service. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 

Sec. 701. Annual enrollment fees for certain retirees and dependents. 

Sec. 702. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces deployed in 

support of a contingency operation. 

Sec. 703. Behavioral health support for members of the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces. 

Sec. 704. Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities. 

Sec. 705. Travel for anesthesia services for childbirth for command-sponsored dependents of members assigned to remote locations outside the continental United States. 

Sec. 706. Transitional health benefits for certain members with extension of active 

duty following active duty in support of a contingency operation. 

Sec. 707. Provision of rehabilitative equipment under Wounded Warrior Act. 

Sec. 708. Transition enrollment of uniformed services family health plan medicareeligible retirees to TRICARE for life. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
173 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Codification and improvement of procedures for mental health evaluations 

for members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 712. Extension of time limit for submittal of claims under the TRICARE program for care provided outside the United States. 

Sec. 713. Expansion of State licensure exception for certain health care professionals. 

Sec. 714. Clarification on confidentiality of medical quality assurance records. 

Sec. 715. Maintenance of the adequacy of provider networks under the TRICARE 

program. 

Sec. 716. Review of the administration of the military health system. 

Sec. 717. Limitation on availability of funds for the future electronic health records 

program. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Modification of authorities on surveys on continued viability of TRICARE 

Standard and TRICARE Extra. 

Sec. 722. Treatment of wounded warriors. 

Sec. 723. Report on research and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Sec. 724. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General report on women-specific health services and treatment for female members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 726. Comptroller General report on contract health care staffing for military 

medical treatment facilities. 

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 

SEC. 701. ANNUAL ENROLLMENT FEES FOR CERTAIN RETIREES AND 

DEPENDENTS. 

(a) ANNUAL ENROLLMENT FEES.—Section 1097(e) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

The Secretary of Defense’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘A premium,’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided by paragraph (2), a premium,’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) Beginning October 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense may 

only increase in any year the annual enrollment fees described in 

paragraph (1) by an amount equal to the percentage by which retired pay is increased under section 1401a of this title.’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013.— 

The Secretary of Defense shall determine the maximum enrollment 

fees for TRICARE Prime under section 1097(e)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code, as added by subsection (a), for fiscal year 2013 and 

thereafter as if the enrollment fee for each enrollee during fiscal 

year 2012 was the amount charged to an enrollee who enrolled for 

the first time during such fiscal year. 

SEC. 702. MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES DEPLOYED IN SUPPORT OF A CONTINGENCY OPERATION. 

(a) MENTAL HEALTH EXAMINATIONS DURING A DEPLOYMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074l the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1074m. Mental health assessments for members of the 

armed forces deployed in support of a contingency 

operation 

‘‘(a) MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
174 

each member of the armed forces who is deployed in support of a 

contingency operation as follows: 

‘‘(A) Once during the period beginning 120 days before the 

date of the deployment. 

‘‘(B) Once during the period beginning 90 days after the 

date of redeployment from the contingency operation and ending 180 days after such redeployment date. 

‘‘(C) Subject to subsection (d), not later than once during 

each of— 

‘‘(i) the period beginning 180 days after the date of redeployment from the contingency operation and ending one 

year after such redeployment date; and 

‘‘(ii) the period beginning 18 months after such redeployment date and ending 30 months after such redeployment date. 

‘‘(2) A mental health assessment is not required for a member 

of the armed forces under subparagraph (B) and (C) of paragraph 

(1) if the Secretary determines that— 

‘‘(A) the member was not subjected or exposed to operational risk factors during deployment in the contingency operation concerned; or 

‘‘(B) providing such assessment to the member during the 

time periods under such subparagraphs would remove the 

member from forward deployment or put members or operational objectives at risk. 

‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the mental health assessments 

provided pursuant to this section shall be to identify post-traumatic 

stress disorder, suicidal tendencies, and other behavioral health 

conditions identified among members described in subsection (a) in 

order to determine which such members are in need of additional 

care and treatment for such health conditions. 

‘‘(c) ELEMENTS.—(1) The mental health assessments provided 

pursuant to this section shall— 

‘‘(A) be performed by personnel trained and certified to perform such assessments and may be performed— 

‘‘(i) by licensed mental health professionals if such professionals are available and the use of such professionals 

for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such 

professionals to perform higher priority tasks; and 

‘‘(ii) by personnel at private facilities in accordance 

with section 1074(c) of this title; 

‘‘(B) include a person-to-person dialogue between members 

described in subsection (a) and the professionals or personnel 

described by subparagraph (A), as applicable, on such matters 

as the Secretary shall specify in order that the assessments 

achieve the purpose specified in subsection (b) for such assessments; 

‘‘(C) be conducted in a private setting to foster trust and 

openness in discussing sensitive health concerns; 

‘‘(D) be provided in a consistent manner across the military 

departments; and 

‘‘(E) include a review of the health records of the member 

that are related to each previous deployment of the member or 

other relevant activities of the member while serving in the 

armed forces, as determined by the Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
175 

‘‘(2) The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and 

other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of 

the armed forces, including examinations under section 1074f of this 

title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements 

for mental health assessments established by this section. 

‘‘(d) CESSATION OF ASSESSMENTS.—No mental health assessment is required to be provided to an individual under subsection 

(a)(1)(C) after the individual’s discharge or release from the armed 

forces. 

‘‘(e) SHARING OF INFORMATION.—(1) The Secretary of Defense 

shall share with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs such information 

on members of the armed forces that is derived from confidential 

mental health assessments, including mental health assessments 

provided pursuant to this section and health assessments and other 

person-to-person assessments provided before the date of the enactment of this section, as the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs jointly consider appropriate to ensure continuity 

of mental health care and treatment of members of the armed forces 

during the transition from health care and treatment provided by 

the Department of Defense to health care and treatment provided by 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

‘‘(2) Any sharing of information under paragraph (1) shall 

occur pursuant to a protocol jointly established by the Secretary of 

Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for purposes of this 

subsection. Any such protocol shall be consistent with the following: 

‘‘(A) Applicable provisions of the Wounded Warrior Act 

(title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note), including section 1614 of such Act (122 Stat. 443; 10 U.S.C. 1071 

note). 

‘‘(B) Section 1720F of title 38. 

‘‘(3) Before each mental health assessment is conducted under 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the member is notified of the sharing of information with the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs under this subsection. 

‘‘(f) REGULATIONS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section. 

‘‘(2) Not later than 270 days after the date of the issuance of 

the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 

notify the congressional defense committees of the implementation of 

the regulations by the military departments.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 1074l the following new item: 

‘‘1074m. Mental health assessments for members of the armed forces deployed in support of a contingency operation.’’. 

(3) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

an interim final rule with respect to the amendment made by 

paragraph (1), effective not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act. 

(b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 708 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 

Stat. 2376; 10 U.S.C. 1074f note) is repealed. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
176 

SEC. 703. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SUPPORT FOR MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS.—Section 1074a of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); 

(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): 

‘‘(h)(1) The Secretary of Defense may provide to any member of 

the reserve components performing inactive-duty training during 

scheduled unit training assemblies access to mental health assessments with a licensed mental health professional who shall be 

available for referrals during duty hours on the premises of the 

principal duty location of the member’s unit. 

‘‘(2) Mental health services provided to a member under this 

subsection shall be at no cost to the member.’’; and 

(3) in subsection (i), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by 

striking ‘‘medical and dental readiness’’ and inserting ‘‘medical, 

dental, and behavioral health readiness’’. 

(b) BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SUPPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each member of a reserve component of 

the Armed Forces participating in annual training or individual duty training shall have access, while so participating, 

to the behavioral health support programs for members of the 

reserve components described in paragraph (2). 

(2) BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SUPPORT PROGRAMS.—The behavioral health support programs for members of the reserve components described in this paragraph shall include one or any 

combination of the following: 

(A) Programs providing access to licensed mental 

health providers in armories, reserve centers, or other 

places for scheduled unit training assemblies. 

(B) Programs providing training on suicide prevention 

and post-suicide response. 

(C) Psychological health programs. 

(D) Such other programs as the Secretary of Defense, 

in consultation with the Surgeon General for the National 

Guard of the State in which the members concerned reside, 

the Director of Psychological Health of the State in which 

the members concerned reside, the Department of Mental 

Health or the equivalent agency of the State in which the 

members concerned reside, or the Director of the Psychological Health Program of the National Guard Bureau, 

considers appropriate. 

(3) FUNDING.—Behavioral health support programs provided to members of the reserve components under this subsection shall be provided using amounts made available for operation and maintenance for the reserve components. 

(4) STATE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘State’’ 

has the meaning given that term in section 10001 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

SEC. 704. PROVISION OF FOOD TO CERTAIN MEMBERS AND DEPENDENTS NOT RECEIVING INPATIENT CARE IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 1078a the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
177 

‘‘§ 1078b. Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary may provide food and beverages to 

an individual described in paragraph (2) at no cost to the individual. 

‘‘(2) An individual described in this paragraph is the following: 

‘‘(A) A member of the uniformed services or dependent— 

‘‘(i) who is receiving outpatient medical care at a military medical treatment facility; and 

‘‘(ii) whom the Secretary determines is unable to purchase food and beverages while at such facility by virtue of 

receiving such care. 

‘‘(B) A member of the uniformed services or dependent— 

‘‘(i) who is a family member of an infant receiving inpatient medical care at a military medical treatment facility; 

‘‘(ii) who provides care to the infant while the infant receives such inpatient medical care; and 

‘‘(iii) whom the Secretary determines is unable to purchase food and beverages while at such facility by virtue of 

providing such care to the infant. 

‘‘(C) A member of the uniformed services or dependent 

whom the Secretary determines is under similar circumstances 

as a member or dependent described in subparagraph (A) or 

(B). 

‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that regulations 

prescribed under this section are consistent with generally accepted 

practices in private medical treatment facilities.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 1078a the following new item: 

‘‘1078b. Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving inpatient 

care in military medical treatment facilities.’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 705. TRAVEL FOR ANESTHESIA SERVICES FOR CHILDBIRTH FOR 

COMMAND-SPONSORED DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS ASSIGNED TO REMOTE LOCATIONS OUTSIDE THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES. 

Section 1040(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided by subparagraph (E), for purposes of 

paragraph (1), required medical attention of a dependent includes, 

in the case of a dependent authorized to accompany a member at 

a location described in that paragraph, obstetrical anesthesia services for childbirth equivalent to the obstetrical anesthesia services 

for childbirth available in a military treatment facility in the 

United States. 

‘‘(B) In the case of a dependent at a remote location outside the 

continental United States who elects services described in subparaVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00207 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
178 

graph (A) and for whom air transportation would be needed to travel under paragraph (1) to the nearest appropriate medical facility 

in which adequate medical care is available, the Secretary may authorize the dependent to receive transportation under that paragraph to the continental United States and be treated at the military treatment facility that can provide appropriate obstetrical services that is nearest to the closest port of entry into the continental 

United States from such remote location. 

‘‘(C) The second through sixth sentences of paragraph (1) shall 

apply to a dependent provided transportation by reason of this 

paragraph. 

‘‘(D) The total cost incurred by the United States for the provision of transportation and expenses (including per diem) with respect to a dependent by reason of this paragraph may not exceed the 

cost the United States would otherwise incur for the provision of 

transportation and expenses with respect to that dependent under 

paragraph (1) if the transportation and expenses were provided to 

that dependent without regard to this paragraph. 

‘‘(E) The Secretary may not provide transportation to a dependent under this paragraph if the Secretary determines that— 

‘‘(i) the dependent would otherwise receive obstetrical anesthesia services at a military treatment facility; and 

‘‘(ii) such facility, in carrying out the required number of 

necessary obstetric cases, would not maintain competency of its 

obstetrical staff unless the facility provides such services to such 

dependent. 

‘‘(F) The authority under this paragraph shall expire on September 30, 2016.’’. 

SEC. 706. TRANSITIONAL HEALTH BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS 

WITH EXTENSION OF ACTIVE DUTY FOLLOWING ACTIVE 

DUTY IN SUPPORT OF A CONTINGENCY OPERATION. 

Section 1145(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of 

the preceding sentence, in the case of a member on active duty as 

described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) who, 

without a break in service, is extended on active duty for any reason, the 180-day period shall begin on the date on which the member is separated from such extended active duty.’’. 

SEC. 707. PROVISION OF REHABILITATIVE EQUIPMENT UNDER 

WOUNDED WARRIOR ACT. 

Section 1631 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 

Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by adding at the 

end the following: 

‘‘(c) REHABILITATIVE EQUIPMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

FORCES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Defense may provide an 

active duty member of the Armed Forces with a severe injury 

or illness with rehabilitative equipment, including recreational 

sports equipment that provide an adaption or accommodation 

for the member, regardless of whether such equipment is intentionally designed to be adaptive equipment. 

‘‘(2) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out this subsection, the 

Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of VetVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00208 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
179 

erans Affairs regarding similar programs carried out by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs.’’. 

SEC. 708. TRANSITION ENROLLMENT OF UNIFORMED SERVICES FAMILY HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREES TO 

TRICARE FOR LIFE. 

Section 724(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘If a covered beneficiary’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

Except as provided in paragraph (2), if a covered beneficiary’’; 

and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) After September 30, 2012, a covered beneficiary (other than 

a beneficiary under section 1079 of title 10, United States Code) 

who is also entitled to hospital insurance benefits under part A of 

title XVIII of the Social Security Act due to age may not enroll in 

the managed care program of a designated provider unless the beneficiary was enrolled in that program on September 30, 2012.’’. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

SEC. 711. CODIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PROCEDURES FOR 

MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATIONS FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

(a) CODIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PROCEDURES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1090 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1090a. Commanding officer and supervisor referrals of 

members for mental health evaluations 

‘‘(a) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

and maintain regulations relating to commanding officer and supervisor referrals of members of the armed forces for mental health 

evaluations. The regulations shall incorporate the requirements set 

forth in subsections (b), (c), and (d) and such other matters as the 

Secretary considers appropriate. 

‘‘(b) REDUCTION OF PERCEIVED STIGMA.—The regulations required by subsection (a) shall, to the greatest extent possible— 

‘‘(1) seek to eliminate perceived stigma associated with seeking and receiving mental health services, promoting the use of 

mental health services on a basis comparable to the use of other 

medical and health services; and 

‘‘(2) clarify the appropriate action to be taken by commanders or supervisory personnel who, in good faith, believe 

that a subordinate may require a mental health evaluation. 

‘‘(c) PROCEDURES FOR INPATIENT EVALUATIONS.—The regulations required by subsection (a) shall provide that, when a commander or supervisor determines that it is necessary to refer a member of the armed forces for a mental health evaluation— 

‘‘(1) the health evaluation shall only be conducted in the 

most appropriate clinical setting, in accordance with the least 

restrictive alternative principle; and 

‘‘(2) only a psychiatrist, or, in cases in which a psychiatrist 

is not available, another mental health professional or a physiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00209 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
180 

cian, may admit the member pursuant to the referral for a mental health evaluation to be conducted on an inpatient basis. 

‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON USE OF REFERRALS FOR MENTAL HEALTH

EVALUATIONS TO RETALIATE AGAINST WHISTLEBLOWERS.—The regulations required by subsection (a) shall provide that no person may 

refer a member of the armed forces for a mental health evaluation 

as a reprisal for making or preparing a lawful communication of 

the type described in section 1034(c)(2) of this title, and applicable 

regulations. For purposes of this subsection, such communication 

shall also include a communication to any appropriate authority in 

the chain of command of the member. 

‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘mental health professional’ means a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, a person with a doctorate in clinical social work, or a psychiatric clinical nurse specialist. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘mental health evaluation’ means a psychiatric examination or evaluation, a psychological examination 

or evaluation, an examination for psychiatric or psychological 

fitness for duty, or any other means of assessing the state of 

mental health of a member of the armed forces. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘least restrictive alternative principle’ means 

a principle under which a member of the armed forces committed for hospitalization and treatment shall be placed in the 

most appropriate and therapeutic available setting— 

‘‘(A) that is no more restrictive than is conducive to the 

most effective form of treatment; and 

‘‘(B) in which treatment is available and the risks of 

physical injury or property damage posed by such placement are warranted by the proposed plan of treatment.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 1090 the following new item: 

‘‘1090a. Commanding officer and supervisor referrals of members for mental health 

evaluations.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 546 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 106 

Stat. 2416; 10 U.S.C. 1074 note) is repealed. 

SEC. 712. EXTENSION OF TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTAL OF CLAIMS 

UNDER THE TRICARE PROGRAM FOR CARE PROVIDED 

OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 

Section 1106(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘not later than’’ and all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘as follows: 

‘‘(1) In the case of services provided outside the United 

States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the possessions of 

the United States, by not later than three years after the services are provided. 

‘‘(2) In the case of any other services, by not later than one 

year after the services are provided.’’. 

SEC. 713. EXPANSION OF STATE LICENSURE EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN 

HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

(a) EXPANSION.—Section 1094(d) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
181 

(A) by inserting ‘‘at any location’’ before ‘‘in any State’’; 

and 

(B) by striking ‘‘regardless’’ and all that follows 

through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘regardless of 

where such health-care professional or the patient are located, so long as the practice is within the scope of the authorized Federal duties.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘member of the armed 

forces’’ and inserting ‘‘member of the armed forces, civilian employee of the Department of Defense, personal services contractor under section 1091 of this title, or other health-care professional credentialed and privileged at a Federal health care 

institution or location specially designated by the Secretary for 

this purpose’’. 

(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to carry out the amendments made by this section. 

SEC. 714. CLARIFICATION ON CONFIDENTIALITY OF MEDICAL QUALITY 

ASSURANCE RECORDS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1102(j) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘any activity carried out’’ 

and inserting ‘‘any peer review activity carried out’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) The term ‘peer review’ means any assessment of the 

quality of medical care carried out by a health care professional, including any such assessment of professional performance, any patient safety program root cause analysis or report, 

or any similar activity described in regulations prescribed by 

the Secretary under subsection (i).’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on January 1, 2012. 

SEC. 715. MAINTENANCE OF THE ADEQUACY OF PROVIDER NETWORKS 

UNDER THE TRICARE PROGRAM. 

Section 1097b(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) In establishing rates and procedures for reimbursement of 

providers and other administrative requirements, including those 

contained in provider network agreements, the Secretary shall, to 

the extent practicable, maintain adequate networks of providers, including institutional, professional, and pharmacy. For the purpose 

of determining whether network providers under such provider network agreements are subcontractors for purposes of the Federal Acquisition Regulation or any other law, a TRICARE managed care 

support contract that includes the requirement to establish, manage, 

or maintain a network of providers may not be considered to be a 

contract for the performance of health care services or supplies on 

the basis of such requirement.’’. 

SEC. 716. REVIEW OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MILITARY 

HEALTH SYSTEM. 

(a) PROHIBITION ON RESTRUCTURE OR REORGANIZATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not restructure or reorganize the military health system until a 120-day 

period has elapsed following the date on which the report under 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
182 

subsection (b)(3) is submitted by the Comptroller General of the 

United States to the congressional defense committees. 

(2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: 

(A) A description of each of the options developed and 

considered by the task force established by the Deputy Secretary of Defense to review the governance model options for 

the military health system (in this section referred to as the 

‘‘task force’’). 

(B) The goals to be achieved by restructure or reorganization and the principles upon which they are based. 

(C) A description of how each option would affect readiness, quality of care, and beneficiary satisfaction. 

(D) An explanation of the costs of each option so considered. 

(E) An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of 

each option. 

(F) An estimate of the cost savings, if any, to be 

achieved by each option compared to the military health 

system in place on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the 

United States shall carry out a review of the options described 

under subsection (a)(2)(A) and the recommendations made by 

the task force. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of 

each option. 

(B) A comparison of each option to each of the governance models for the military health system adopted as of 

October 1, 1991. 

(C) An estimate of the costs to implement each option. 

(D) An estimate of the cost savings, if any, to be 

achieved by each option compared to the military health 

system in place on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date on 

which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (a)(2), 

the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review. 

SEC. 717. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE FUTURE 

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the procurement, research, development, test, and evaluation, or operation 

and maintenance of the future electronic health records program, 

not more than 10 percent may be obligated or expended until the 

date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense 

submits to the congressional defense committees a report addressing— 

(1) an architecture to guide the transition of the electronic 

health records of the Department of Defense to a future state 

that is cost-effective and interoperable; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
183 

(2) the process for selecting investments in information 

technology that support the architecture described in paragraph 

(1); 

(3) the report required by section 715 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4249); 

(4) the role of the Interagency Program Office to manage or 

oversee efforts with respect to the future electronic health 

records program; and 

(5) any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(b) FUTURE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘future electronic health records 

program’’ means the programs of the Department of Defense referred 

to as the ‘‘EHR way ahead’’ and the ‘‘virtual lifetime electronic 

record’’. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 721. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON SURVEYS ON CONTINUED VIABILITY OF TRICARE STANDARD AND TRICARE 

EXTRA. 

(a) SCOPE OF CERTAIN SURVEYS.—Subsection (a)(3)(A) of section 711 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 190; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

(b) FREQUENCY OF SUBMITTAL OF GAO REVIEWS.—Subsection 

(b)(2) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘bi-annual basis’’ and 

inserting ‘‘biennial basis’’. 

SEC. 722. TREATMENT OF WOUNDED WARRIORS. 

The Secretary of Defense may establish a program to enter into 

partnerships to enable coordinated, rapid clinical evaluation and 

the application of evidence-based treatment strategies for wounded 

service members, with an emphasis on the most common musculoskeletal injuries, that will address the priorities of the Armed Forces 

with respect to retention and readiness. 

SEC. 723. REPORT ON RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the benefits of neuroimaging research in an effort to identify, and improve the diagnosis of, posttraumatic stress disorder. 

SEC. 724. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURIES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— 

(1) the implementation of the policy of the Department of 

Defense related to the management of concussion and mild 

traumatic brain injury in the deployed setting; 

(2) the effectiveness of such policy with respect to identifying and treating blast-related concussive injuries; and 

(3) the effect of such policy on operational effectiveness in 

theater. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
184 

SEC. 725. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON WOMEN-SPECIFIC 

HEALTH SERVICES AND TREATMENT FOR FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall carry out a review of women-specific health services and treatment for female members of the Armed Forces. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The review required by subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) The need for women-specific health outreach, prevention, and treatment services for female members of the Armed 

Forces. 

(2) The access to and efficacy of existing women-specific 

mental health outreach, prevention, and treatment services and 

programs (including substance abuse programs). 

(3) The availability of women-specific services and treatment for female members of the Armed Forces who experience 

sexual assault or sexual abuse. 

(4) The access to and need for military medical treatment 

facilities to provide for the women-specific health care needs of 

female members of the Armed Forces. 

(5) The access to and efficacy of women-specific breast cancer services and programs with respect to outreach, prevention, 

and treatment. 

(6) The need for further clinical research on the women-specific health care needs of female members of the Armed Forces 

who served in a combat zone. 

(7) An assessment of the policies, procedures, and programs 

of the Department of Defense that include specific force health 

protection and access to care for female members of the Armed 

Forces as an element of readiness. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2012, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the review required by subsection (a). 

SEC. 726. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON CONTRACT HEALTH 

CARE STAFFING FOR MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2012, the Comptroller 

General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the contracting activities of the military departments with respect to providing health 

care professional services to members of the Armed Forces, dependents, and retirees. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A review of the contracting practices used by the military departments to provide health care professional services by 

civilian providers. 

(2) An assessment of whether the contracting practices described in paragraph (1) are the most cost effective means to 

provide necessary care. 

(3) A determination of— 

(A) the percentage of contract health care professionals 

who provide services to members of the Armed Forces, dependents, or retirees in military medical treatment facilities 

or other on-base facilities; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
185 

(B) the percentage of contract health care professionals 

who provide services to members of the Armed Forces, dependents, or retirees in off-base private facilities. 

(4) A comparison of the cost associated with the provision 

of care by contract health care professionals described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (3). 

(5) An assessment of whether or not consolidating health 

care staffing requirements for military medical treatment facilities and other on-base clinics in defined geographic areas (including regions or catchment areas) would achieve economies of 

scale and cost savings or avoidance with respect to contracting 

for health care professionals. 

(6) An assessment of whether private sector entities that 

provide health care professional staff on a contract basis to 

military medical treatment facilities and other on-base clinics 

meet certain basic standards of professionalism, including those 

described in section 732(c)(2)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 

2297). 

(7) An assessment of the acquisition training and experience of the contracting officers or other personnel within military medical treatment facilities that award or administer contracts regarding the services of health care professionals. 

(8) Any recommendations the Comptroller General considers appropriate regarding improving the contracting activities of the military departments with respect to providing health 

care professional services. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION 

MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Requirements relating to core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities for Milestone A and Milestone B and elimination of references to 

Key Decision Points A and B. 

Sec. 802. Revision to law relating to disclosures to litigation support contractors. 

Sec. 803. Extension of applicability of the senior executive benchmark compensation 

amount for purposes of allowable cost limitations under defense contracts. 

Sec. 804. Extension of availability of funds in the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. 

Sec. 805. Defense Contract Audit Agency annual report. 

Sec. 806. Inclusion of data on contractor performance in past performance databases 

for source selection decisions. 

Sec. 807. Implementation of recommendations of Defense Science Board Task Force 

on Improvements to Service Contracting. 

Sec. 808. Temporary limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 809. Annual report on single-award task and delivery order contracts. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Calculation of time period relating to report on critical changes in major 

automated information systems. 

Sec. 812. Change in deadline for submission of Selected Acquisition Reports from 60 

to 45 days. 

Sec. 813. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order contracts. 

Sec. 814. Clarification of Department of Defense authority to purchase right-hand 

drive passenger sedan vehicles and adjustment of threshold for inflation. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
186 

Sec. 815. Rights in technical data and validation of proprietary data restrictions. 

Sec. 816. Covered contracts for purposes of requirements on contractor business systems. 

Sec. 817. Compliance with defense procurement requirements for purposes of internal controls of non-defense agencies for procurements on behalf of the 

Department of Defense. 

Sec. 818. Detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. 

Sec. 819. Modification of certain requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition 

Reform Act of 2009. 

Sec. 820. Inclusion of contractor support requirements in Department of Defense 

planning documents. 

Sec. 821. Amendment relating to buying tents, tarpaulins, or covers from American 

sources. 

Sec. 822. Repeal of sunset of authority to procure fire resistant rayon fiber from foreign sources for the production of uniforms. 

Sec. 823. Prohibition on collection of political information. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 831. Waiver of requirements relating to new milestone approval for certain 

major defense acquisition programs experiencing critical cost growth 

due to change in quantity purchased. 

Sec. 832. Assessment, management, and control of operating and support costs for 

major weapon systems. 

Sec. 833. Clarification of responsibility for cost analyses and targets for contract negotiation purposes. 

Sec. 834. Modification of requirements for guidance on management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs. 

Sec. 835. Management of developmental test and evaluation for major defense acquisition programs. 

Sec. 836. Assessment of risk associated with development of major weapon systems 

to be procured under cooperative projects with friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 837. Competition in maintenance and sustainment of subsystems of major 

weapon systems. 

Sec. 838. Oversight of and reporting requirements with respect to Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program. 

Sec. 839. Implementation of acquisition strategy for Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 841. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy in the United States Central 

Command theater of operations. 

Sec. 842. Additional access to contractor and subcontractor records in the United 

States Central Command theater of operations. 

Sec. 843. Reach-back contracting authority for Operation Enduring Freedom and 

Operation New Dawn. 

Sec. 844. Competition and review of contracts for property or services in support of 

a contingency operation. 

Sec. 845. Inclusion of associated support services in rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for supplies. 

Sec. 846. Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund to rapidly meet urgent operational 

needs. 

Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 851. Assessment of the defense industrial base pilot program. 

Sec. 852. Strategy for securing the defense supply chain and industrial base. 

Sec. 853. Assessment of feasability and advisability of establishment of rare earth 

material inventory. 

Sec. 854. Department of Defense assessment of industrial base for night vision 

image intensification sensors. 

Sec. 855. Technical amendment relating to responsibilities of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 861. Clarification of jurisdiction of the United States district courts to hear bid 

protest disputes involving maritime contracts. 

Sec. 862. Encouragement of contractor Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math 

(STEM) programs. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
187 

Sec. 863. Sense of Congress and report on authorities available to the Department 

of Defense for multiyear contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels. 

Sec. 864. Acquisition workforce improvements. 

Sec. 865. Modification of delegation of authority to make determinations on entry 

into cooperative research and development agreements with NATO and 

other friendly organizations and countries. 

Sec. 866. Three-year extension of test program for negotiation of comprehensive 

small business subcontracting plans. 

Sec. 867. Five-year extension of Department of Defense Mentor-Protege Program. 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

SEC. 801. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO CORE DEPOT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR CAPABILITIES FOR MILESTONE A 

AND MILESTONE B AND ELIMINATION OF REFERENCES TO 

KEY DECISION POINTS A AND B. 

(a) ADDITIONAL MILESTONE A REQUIREMENTS.— 

(1) ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF CERTIFICATION.—Subsection (a) of 

section 2366a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘core competency’’ and 

inserting ‘‘function’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 

paragraph (4): 

‘‘(4) that a determination of applicability of core depot-level 

maintenance and repair capabilities requirements has been 

made;’’; and 

(D) in paragraph (6) (as so redesignated), by striking 

‘‘develop and procure’’ and inserting ‘‘develop, procure, and 

sustain’’. 

(2) DEFINITION.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended 

by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(7) The term ‘core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities’’ means the core depot-level maintenance and repair 

capabilities identified under section 2464(a) of this title.’’. 

(b) ADDITIONAL MILESTONE B REQUIREMENTS.— 

(1) ADDITIONAL ITEM OF CERTIFICATION.—Subsection (a)(3) 

of section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (G); 

(B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (D); 

and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following 

new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(E) life-cycle sustainment planning, including corrosion prevention and mitigation planning, has identified 

and evaluated relevant sustainment costs throughout development, production, operation, sustainment, and disposal 

of the program, and any alternatives, and that such costs 

are reasonable and have been accurately estimated; 

‘‘(F) an estimate has been made of the requirements for 

core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities, as 

well as the associated logistics capabilities and the associated sustaining workloads required to support such requirements; and’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
188 

(2) DEFINITION.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended 

by striking paragraph (5) (relating to Key Decision Point B) and 

inserting the following new paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) The term ‘core logistics capabilities’ means the core logistics capabilities identified under section 2464(a) of this 

title.’’. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO LOW-RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION.— Prior to entering into a contract for low-rate initial production of a 

major defense acquisition program, the Secretary of Defense shall 

ensure that the detailed requirements for core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities, as well as the associated logistics capabilities and the associated sustaining workloads required to support such requirements, have been defined. 

(d) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance 

implementing the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b), and 

subsection (c), in a manner that is consistent across the Department 

of Defense. 

(e) ELIMINATION OF REFERENCES TO KEY DECISION POINTS A 

AND B.— 

(1) AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 2366a.—Section 2366a of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘or Key Decision Point’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, or Key Decision Point A approval 

in the case of a space program,’’ and by striking ‘‘, or Key 

Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program,’’; 

and 

(C) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘(or Key Decision 

Point A approval in the case of a space program)’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2)(C)(ii), by striking ‘‘, or Key 

Decision Point A approval in the case of a space program,’’. 

(2) AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 2366b.—Section 2366b of 

such title is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘or Key Decision Point B’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, or Key Decision Point B approval 

in the case of a space program,’’; and 

(C) in subsections (b)(2) and (d)(1), by striking ‘‘(or Key 

Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program)’’ 

each place it appears. 

(3) AMENDMENTS TO TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The items relating to sections 2366a and 2366b in the table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 139 of such title are amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘2366a. Major defense acquisition programs: certification required before Milestone 

A approval. 

‘‘2366b. Major defense acquisition programs: certification required before Milestone 

B approval.’’. 

(4) ADDITIONAL CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 

2433a(c)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘, or Key DeciVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00218 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
189 

sion Point approval in the case of a space program,’’ each place 

it appears in subparagraphs (B) and (C). 

SEC. 802. REVISION TO LAW RELATING TO DISCLOSURES TO LITIGATION SUPPORT CONTRACTORS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.— 

(1) REVISED AUTHORITY TO COVER DISCLOSURES UNDER

LITIGATION SUPPORT CONTRACTS.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by inserting after section 129c the following new section: 

‘‘§ 129d. Disclosure to litigation support contractors 

‘‘(a) DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY.—An officer or employee of the Department of Defense may disclose sensitive information to a litigation support contractor if— 

‘‘(1) the disclosure is for the sole purpose of providing litigation support to the Government in the form of administrative, 

technical, or professional services during or in anticipation of 

litigation; and 

‘‘(2) under a contract with the Government, the litigation 

support contractor agrees to and acknowledges— 

‘‘(A) that sensitive information furnished will be 

accessed and used only for the purposes stated in the relevant contract; 

‘‘(B) that the contractor will take all precautions necessary to prevent disclosure of the sensitive information 

provided to the contractor; 

‘‘(C) that such sensitive information provided to the 

contractor under the authority of this section shall not be 

used by the contractor to compete against a third party for 

Government or non-Government contracts; and 

‘‘(D) that the violation of subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) 

is a basis for the Government to terminate the litigation 

support contract of the contractor. 

‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘litigation support contractor’ means a contractor (including an expert or technical consultant) under contract with the Department of Defense to provide litigation support. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘sensitive information’ means confidential 

commercial, financial, or proprietary information, technical 

data, or other privileged information.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 129c the following new item: 

‘‘129d. Disclosure to litigation support contractors.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS ENACTED IN PUBLIC

LAW 111–383.—Section 2320 of such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘a covered Government’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

(a), allowing a covered Government’’; and 

(B) by striking subparagraph (B); and 

(2) by striking subsection (g). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
190 

SEC. 803. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE 

BENCHMARK COMPENSATION AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF 

ALLOWABLE COST LIMITATIONS UNDER DEFENSE CONTRACTS. 

(a) CERTAIN COMPENSATION NOT ALLOWABLE UNDER DEFENSE

CONTRACTS.—Subsection (e)(1)(P) of section 2324 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘senior executives of contractors’’ and inserting ‘‘any contractor employee’’; and 

(2) by adding before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, 

except that the Secretary of Defense may establish one or more 

narrowly targeted exceptions for scientists and engineers upon 

a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that 

the Department of Defense has continued access to needed skills 

and capabilities’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (l) of such section is 

amended by striking paragraph (5). 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section— 

(1) shall be implemented in the Federal Acquisition Regulation within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; 

and 

(2) shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred after January 1, 2012, under contracts entered into before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 804. EXTENSION OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN THE DEFENSE 

ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND. 

(a) AVAILABILITY.—Paragraph (6) of section 1705(e) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(6) DURATION OF AVAILABILITY.—Amounts credited to the 

Fund in accordance with subsection (d)(2), transferred to the 

Fund pursuant to subsection (d)(3), appropriated to the Fund, 

or deposited to the Fund shall remain available for obligation 

in the fiscal year for which credited, transferred, appropriated, 

or deposited and the two succeeding fiscal years.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (6) of such section, as amended by subsection (a), shall not apply to funds directly appropriated 

to the Fund before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 805. DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT. 

(a) DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT.— 

Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

after section 2313 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2313a. Defense Contract Audit Agency: annual report 

‘‘(a) REQUIRED REPORT.—The Director of the Defense Contract 

Audit Agency shall prepare an annual report of the activities of the 

Agency during the previous fiscal year. The report shall include, at 

a minimum— 

‘‘(1) a description of significant problems, abuses, and deficiencies encountered during the conduct of contractor audits; 

‘‘(2) statistical tables showing— 

‘‘(A) the total number of audit reports completed and 

pending; 

‘‘(B) the priority given to each type of audit; 

‘‘(C) the length of time taken for each type of audit; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
191 

‘‘(D) the total dollar value of questioned costs (including a separate category for the dollar value of unsupported 

costs); and 

‘‘(E) an assessment of the number and types of audits 

pending for a period longer than allowed pursuant to guidance of the Defense Contract Audit Agency; 

‘‘(3) a summary of any recommendations of actions or resources needed to improve the audit process; and 

‘‘(4) any other matters the Director considers appropriate. 

‘‘(b) SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than March 

30 of each year, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (a). 

‘‘(c) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—Not later than 60 days after the 

submission of an annual report to the congressional defense committees under subsection (b), the Director shall make the report available on the publicly available website of the Agency or such other 

publicly available website as the Director considers appropriate.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 2313 the following new item: 

‘‘2313a. Defense Contract Audit Agency: annual report.’’. 

SEC. 806. INCLUSION OF DATA ON CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE IN 

PAST PERFORMANCE DATABASES FOR SOURCE SELECTION DECISIONS. 

(a) STRATEGY ON INCLUSION REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary 

of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall develop 

a strategy for ensuring that timely, accurate, and complete information on contractor performance is included in past performance 

databases used for making source selection decisions. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall, 

at a minimum— 

(1) establish standards for the timeliness and completeness 

of past performance submissions for purposes of databases described in subsection (a); 

(2) assign responsibility and management accountability 

for the completeness of past performance submissions for such 

purposes; and 

(3) ensure that past performance submissions for such purposes are consistent with award fee evaluations in cases where 

such evaluations have been conducted. 

(c) CONTRACTOR COMMENTS.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall revise the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require the following: 

(1) That affected contractors are provided, in a timely manner, information on contractor performance to be included in 

past performance databases in accordance with subsection (a). 

(2) That such contractors are afforded up to 14 calendar 

days, from the date of delivery of the information provided in 

accordance with paragraph (1), to submit comments, rebuttals, 

or additional information pertaining to past performance for inclusion in such databases. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
192 

(3) That agency evaluations of contractor past performance, 

including any information submitted under paragraph (2), are 

included in the relevant past performance database not later 

than the date that is 14 days after the date of delivery of the 

information provided in accordance with paragraph (1). 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 

to prohibit a contractor from submitting comments, rebuttals, or additional information pertaining to past performance after the period 

described in paragraph (2) has elapsed or to prohibit a contractor 

from challenging a past performance evaluation in accordance with 

applicable laws, regulations, or procedures. 

(e) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 18 months 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the actions taken by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics pursuant to this section, including an assessment of the extent to which such actions 

have achieved the objectives of this section. 

SEC. 807. IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF DEFENSE 

SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON IMPROVEMENTS TO 

SERVICE CONTRACTING. 

(a) PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall, acting pursuant to 

the Under Secretary’s responsibility under section 2330 of title 10, 

United States Code, develop a plan for implementing the recommendations of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Improvements to Service Contracting. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The plan developed pursuant to subsection (a) 

shall include, to the extent determined appropriate by the Under 

Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the following: 

(1) Meaningful incentives to services contractors for high 

performance at low cost, consistent with the objectives of the 

Better Buying Power Initiative established by the Under Secretary. 

(2) Improved means of communication between the Government and the services contracting industry in the process of developing requirements for services contracts. 

(3) Clear guidance for defense acquisition personnel on the 

use of appropriate contract types for particular categories of 

services contracts. 

(4) Formal certification and training requirements for services acquisition personnel, consistent with the requirements of 

sections 1723 and 1724 of title 10, United States Code. 

(5) Appropriate emphasis on the recruiting and training of 

services acquisition personnel, consistent with the strategic 

workforce plan developed pursuant to section 115b of title 10, 

United States Code, and the funds available through the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund 

established pursuant to section 1705 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(6) Policies and guidance on career development for services 

acquisition personnel, consistent with the requirements of sections 1722a and 1722b of title 10, United States Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
193 

(7) Actions to ensure that the military departments dedicate 

portfolio-specific commodity managers to coordinate the procurement of key categories of contract services, as required by 

section 2330(b)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code. 

(8) Actions to ensure that the Department of Defense conducts realistic exercises and training that account for services 

contracting during contingency operations, as required by section 2333(e) of title 10, United States Code. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 18 months 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the following: 

(1) The actions taken by the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to carry out the requirements of this section. 

(2) The actions taken by the Under Secretary to carry out 

the requirements of section 2330 of title 10, United States Code. 

(3) The actions taken by the military departments to carry 

out the requirements of section 2330 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(4) The extent to which the actions described in paragraphs 

(1), (2), and (3) have resulted in the improved acquisition and 

management of contract services. 

SEC. 808. TEMPORARY LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT 

AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the total 

amount obligated by the Department of Defense for contract services 

in fiscal year 2012 or 2013 may not exceed the total amount requested for the Department for contract services in the budget of the 

President for fiscal year 2010 (as submitted to Congress pursuant 

to section 1105(b) of title 31, United States Code) adjusted for net 

transfers from funding for overseas contingency operations. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding the limitation in subsection 

(a), the total amount obligated by the Department for contract services in fiscal year 2012 or 2013 may exceed the amount otherwise 

provided pursuant to subsection (a) by an amount elected by the 

Secretary of Defense that is not greater than the cost of any increase 

in such fiscal year in the number of civilian billets at the Department that has been approved by the Secretary over the number of 

such billets at the Department in fiscal year 2010. 

(c) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance to the military departments and the Defense Agencies on implementation of 

this section during fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The guidance shall, 

at a minimum— 

(1) establish a negotiation objective that labor rates and 

overhead rates in any contract or task order for contract services with an estimated value in excess of $10,000,000 awarded 

to a contractor in fiscal year 2012 or 2013 shall not exceed 

labor rates and overhead rates paid to the contractor for contract services in fiscal year 2010; 

(2) require the Secretaries of the military departments and 

the heads of the Defense Agencies to approve in writing any contract or task order for contract services with an estimated value 

in excess of $10,000,000 awarded to a contractor in fiscal year 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
194 

2012 or 2013 that provides for continuing services at an annual 

cost that exceeds the annual cost paid by the military department or Defense Agency concerned for the same or similar services in fiscal year 2010; 

(3) require the Secretaries of the military departments and 

the heads of the Defense Agencies to eliminate any contractor 

positions identified by the military department or Defense Agency concerned as being responsible for the performance of inherently governmental functions; 

(4) require the Secretaries of the military departments and 

the heads of the Defense Agencies to reduce by 10 percent per 

fiscal year in each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013 the funding 

of the military department or Defense Agency concerned for— 

(A) staff augmentation contracts; and 

(B) contracts for the performance of functions closely 

associated with inherently governmental functions; and 

(5) assign responsibility to the management officials designated pursuant to section 2330 of title 10, United States Code, 

and section 812(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3378; 10 

U.S.C. 2330 note) to provide oversight and ensure the implementation of the requirements of this section during fiscal years 

2012 and 2013. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘contract services’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 235 of title 10, United States Code, except that 

the term does not include services that are funded out of 

amounts available for overseas contingency operations. 

(2) The term ‘‘function closely associated with inherently 

governmental functions’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 2383(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code. 

(3) The term ‘‘staff augmentation contracts’’ means contracts for personnel who are subject to the direction of a government official other than the contracting officer for the contract, 

including, but not limited to, contractor personnel who perform 

personal services contracts (as that term is defined in section 

2330a(g)(5) of title 10, United States Code). 

(4) The term ‘‘transfers from funding for overseas contingency operations’’ means amounts funded out of amounts available for overseas contingency operations in fiscal year 2010 that 

are funded out of amounts other than amounts so available in 

fiscal year 2012 or 2013. 

SEC. 809. ANNUAL REPORT ON SINGLE-AWARD TASK AND DELIVERY 

ORDER CONTRACTS. 

(a) ANNUAL REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 817(d) of the Bob 

Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 

(Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2611; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is 

amended— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
195 

‘‘(C) with respect to any determination pursuant to section 

2304a(d)(3)(D) of title 10, United States Code, that because of 

exceptional circumstances it is necessary in the public interest 

to award a task or delivery order contract with an estimated 

value in excess of $100,000,000 to a single source, an explanation of the basis for the determination.’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is amended by striking ‘‘WITH PRICE OR VALUE GREATER

THAN $15,000,000’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF CASE-BY-CASE REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 2304a(d)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking subparagraph (B); 

(2) by striking ‘‘(A)’’; 

(3) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) as subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D), respectively; and 

(4) in subparagraph (B), as redesignated by paragraph (3), 

by redesignating subclauses (I) and (II) as clauses (i) and (ii), 

respectively. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, 

Procedures, and Limitations 

SEC. 811. CALCULATION OF TIME PERIOD RELATING TO REPORT ON 

CRITICAL CHANGES IN MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. 

Section 2445c(d)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(A) the automated information system or information 

technology investment failed to achieve a full deployment 

decision within five years after the Milestone A decision for 

the program or, if there was no Milestone A decision, the 

date when the preferred alternative is selected for the program (excluding any time during which program activity is 

delayed as a result of a bid protest);’’. 

SEC. 812. CHANGE IN DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS FROM 60 TO 45 DAYS. 

Section 2432(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘60’’ and inserting ‘‘45’’. 

SEC. 813. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PROTESTS OF 

TASK AND DELIVERY ORDER CONTRACTS. 

Paragraph (3) of section 4106(f) of title 41, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(3) EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—Paragraph (1)(B) and paragraph 

(2) of this subsection shall not be in effect after September 30, 

2016.’’. 

SEC. 814. CLARIFICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY 

TO PURCHASE RIGHT-HAND DRIVE PASSENGER SEDAN VEHICLES AND ADJUSTMENT OF THRESHOLD FOR INFLATION. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 2253(a)(2) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘vehicles’’ and inserting ‘‘passenger sedans’’. 

(b) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—The Department of Defense 

representative to the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council established under section 1302 of title 41, United States Code, shall ensure that the threshold established in section 2253 of title 10, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
196 

United States Code, for the acquisition of right-hand drive passenger sedans is included on the list of dollar thresholds that are 

subject to adjustment for inflation in accordance with the requirements of section 1908 of title 41, United States Code, and is adjusted pursuant to such provision, as appropriate. 

SEC. 815. RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA AND VALIDATION OF PROPRIETARY DATA RESTRICTIONS. 

(a) RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA.—Section 2320 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (2)(D)(i)— 

(i) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(ii) by redesignating subclause (II) as subclause 

(III); and 

(iii) by inserting after subclause (I) the following 

new subclause (II): 

‘‘(II) is necessary for the segregation of an item or 

process from, or the reintegration of that item or process (or a physically or functionally equivalent item or 

process) with, other items or processes; or’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking ‘‘and shall be 

based’’ and all that follows through ‘‘such rights shall’’ and 

inserting ‘‘. The United States shall have government purpose rights in such technical data, except in any case in 

which the Secretary of Defense determines, on the basis of 

criteria established in such regulations, that negotiation of 

different rights in such technical data would be in the best 

interest of the United States. The establishment of any such 

negotiated rights shall’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘for the purposes of 

paragraph (2)(B), but shall be considered to be Federal 

funds for the purposes of paragraph (2)(A)’’ and inserting 

‘‘for the purposes of the definitions under this paragraph’’; 

and 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(B) in paragraph (8), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(9) providing that, in addition to technical data that is already subject to a contract delivery requirement, the United 

States may require at any time the delivery of technical data 

that has been generated or utilized in the performance of a contract, and compensate the contractor only for reasonable costs 

incurred for having converted and delivered the data in the required form, upon a determination that— 

‘‘(A) the technical data is needed for the purpose of reprocurement, sustainment, modification, or upgrade (including through competitive means) of a major system or 

subsystem thereof, a weapon system or subsystem thereof, 

or any noncommercial item or process; and 

‘‘(B) the technical data— 

‘‘(i) pertains to an item or process developed in 

whole or in part with Federal funds; or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
197 

‘‘(ii) is necessary for the segregation of an item or 

process from, or the reintegration of that item or process (or a physically or functionally equivalent item or 

process) with, other items or processes; and 

‘‘(10) providing that the United States is not foreclosed 

from requiring the delivery of the technical data by a failure to 

challenge, in accordance with the requirements of section 

2321(d) of this title, the contractor’s assertion of a use or release 

restriction on the technical data.’’. 

(b) VALIDATION OF PROPRIETARY DATA RESTRICTIONS.—Section 

2321(d)(2) of such title is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A)— 

(A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph (C)’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘three-year period’’ and inserting ‘‘A challenge to a 

use or release restriction asserted by the contractor in accordance with applicable regulations may not be made 

under paragraph (1) after the end of the six-year period’’; 

(B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(C) in clause (iii) by striking the period and inserting 

‘‘; or’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iv) are the subject of a fraudulently asserted use or 

release restriction.’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘three-year period’’ 

each place it appears and inserting ‘‘six-year period’’; and 

(3) by striking subparagraph (C). 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 

amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—The amendment made by subsection 

(a)(1)(C) shall take effect on January 7, 2011, immediately after 

the enactment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383), to which 

such amendment relates. 

SEC. 816. COVERED CONTRACTS FOR PURPOSES OF REQUIREMENTS 

ON CONTRACTOR BUSINESS SYSTEMS. 

Paragraph (3) of section 893(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 

124 Stat. 4312; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(3) The term ‘covered contract’ means a contract that is 

subject to the cost accounting standards promulgated pursuant 

to section 1502 of title 41, United States Code, that could be affected if the data produced by a contractor business system has 

a significant deficiency.’’. 

SEC. 817. COMPLIANCE WITH DEFENSE PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF INTERNAL CONTROLS OF NONDEFENSE AGENCIES FOR PROCUREMENTS ON BEHALF OF 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

Section 801(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking 

‘‘with the requirements’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘with the 

following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
198 

‘‘(1) The Federal Acquisition Regulation and other laws 

and regulations that apply to procurements of property and 

services by Federal agencies. 

‘‘(2) Laws and regulations (including applicable Department of Defense financial management regulations) that apply 

to procurements of property and services made by the Department of Defense through other Federal agencies.’’. 

SEC. 818. DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE OF COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC 

PARTS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICIES AND

SYSTEMS.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment of 

Department of Defense acquisition policies and systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. 

(b) ACTIONS FOLLOWING ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary shall, based 

on the results of the assessment required by subsection (a)— 

(1) establish Department-wide definitions of the terms 

‘‘counterfeit electronic part’’ and ‘‘suspect counterfeit electronic 

part’’, which definitions shall include previously used parts represented as new; 

(2) issue or revise guidance applicable to Department components engaged in the purchase of electronic parts to implement a risk-based approach to minimize the impact of counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts on the 

Department, which guidance shall address requirements for 

training personnel, making sourcing decisions, ensuring 

traceability of parts, inspecting and testing parts, reporting and 

quarantining counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit 

electronic parts, and taking corrective actions (including actions 

to recover costs as described in subsection (c)(2)); 

(3) issue or revise guidance applicable to the Department on 

remedial actions to be taken in the case of a supplier who has 

repeatedly failed to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts 

or otherwise failed to exercise due diligence in the detection and 

avoidance of such parts, including consideration of whether to 

suspend or debar a supplier until such time as the supplier has 

effectively addressed the issues that led to such failures; 

(4) establish processes for ensuring that Department personnel who become aware of, or have reason to suspect, that any 

end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies 

purchased by or for the Department contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts provide a report in writing within 60 days to appropriate Government authorities and to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (or a similar program designated by the Secretary); and 

(5) establish a process for analyzing, assessing, and acting 

on reports of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit 

electronic parts that are submitted in accordance with the processes under paragraph (4). 

(c) REGULATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to address the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
199 

(2) CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES.—The revised regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall provide that— 

(A) covered contractors who supply electronic parts or 

products that include electronic parts are responsible for 

detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit 

electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts in 

such products and for any rework or corrective action that 

may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such 

parts; and 

(B) the cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect 

counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts. 

(3) TRUSTED SUPPLIERS.—The revised regulations issued 

pursuant to paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) require that, whenever possible, the Department 

and Department contractors and subcontractors at all 

tiers— 

(i) obtain electronic parts that are in production or 

currently available in stock from the original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers, or from 

trusted suppliers who obtain such parts exclusively 

from the original manufacturers of the parts or their 

authorized dealers; and 

(ii) obtain electronic parts that are not in production or currently available in stock from trusted suppliers; 

(B) establish requirements for notification of the Department, and inspection, testing, and authentication of 

electronic parts that the Department or a Department contractor or subcontractor obtains from any source other than 

a source described in subparagraph (A); 

(C) establish qualification requirements, consistent 

with the requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United 

States Code, pursuant to which the Department may identify trusted suppliers that have appropriate policies and 

procedures in place to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts; and 

(D) authorize Department contractors and subcontractors to identify and use additional trusted suppliers, provided that— 

(i) the standards and processes for identifying such 

trusted suppliers comply with established industry 

standards; 

(ii) the contractor or subcontractor assumes responsibility for the authenticity of parts provided by such 

suppliers as provided in paragraph (2); and 

(iii) the selection of such trusted suppliers is subject to review and audit by appropriate Department officials. 

(4) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—The revised regulations 

issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall require that any Department contractor or subcontractor who becomes aware, or has 

reason to suspect, that any end item, component, part, or mateVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00229 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
200 

rial contained in supplies purchased by the Department, or purchased by a contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the Department, contains counterfeit electronic parts or 

suspect counterfeit electronic parts report in writing within 60 

days to appropriate Government authorities and the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (or a similar program 

designated by the Secretary). 

(5) CONSTRUCTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH REPORTING RE- QUIREMENT.—A Department contractor or subcontractor that 

provides a written report required under this subsection shall 

not be subject to civil liability on the basis of such reporting, 

provided the contractor or subcontractor made a reasonable effort to determine that the end item, component, part, or material concerned contained counterfeit electronic parts or suspect 

counterfeit electronic parts. 

(d) INSPECTION PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish and implement a risk-based methodology for the 

enhanced targeting of electronic parts imported from any country, 

after consultation with the Secretary of Defense as to sources of 

counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts 

in the supply chain for products purchased by the Department of 

Defense. 

(e) IMPROVEMENT OF CONTRACTOR SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION

AND AVOIDANCE OF COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PARTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a program to enhance contractor detection and avoidance 

of counterfeit electronic parts. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The program implemented pursuant to 

paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) require covered contractors that supply electronic 

parts or systems that contain electronic parts to establish 

policies and procedures to eliminate counterfeit electronic 

parts from the defense supply chain, which policies and 

procedures shall address— 

(i) the training of personnel; 

(ii) the inspection and testing of electronic parts; 

(iii) processes to abolish counterfeit parts proliferation; 

(iv) mechanisms to enable traceability of parts; 

(v) use of trusted suppliers; 

(vi) the reporting and quarantining of counterfeit 

electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts; 

(vii) methodologies to identify suspect counterfeit 

parts and to rapidly determine if a suspect counterfeit 

part is, in fact, counterfeit; 

(viii) the design, operation, and maintenance of 

systems to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts 

and suspect counterfeit electronic parts; and 

(ix) the flow down of counterfeit avoidance and detection requirements to subcontractors; and 

(B) establish processes for the review and approval of 

contractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic 

parts, which processes shall be comparable to the processes 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
201 

established for contractor business systems under section 

893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4311; 

10 U.S.C. 2302 note). 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—In subsections (a) through (e) of this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘covered contractor’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 893(f)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. 

(2) The term ‘‘electronic part’’ means an integrated circuit, 

a discrete electronic component (including, but not limited to, a 

transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode), or a circuit assembly. 

(g) INFORMATION SHARING.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If United States Customs and Border 

Protection suspects a product of being imported in violation of 

section 42 of the Lanham Act, and subject to any applicable 

bonding requirements, the Secretary of the Treasury may share 

information appearing on, and unredacted samples of, products 

and their packaging and labels, or photographs of such products, packaging, and labels, with the rightholders of the trademarks suspected of being copied or simulated for purposes of 

determining whether the products are prohibited from importation pursuant to such section. 

(2) SUNSET.—This subsection shall expire on the date of the 

enactment of the Customs Facilitation and Trade Enforcement 

Reauthorization Act of 2012. 

(3) LANHAM ACT DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘‘Lanham Act’’ means the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the 

registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to 

carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, 

and for other purposes’’, approved July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Trademark Act of 1946’’ or the ‘‘Lanham Act’’). 

(h) TRAFFICKING IN INHERENTLY DANGEROUS GOODS OR SERV- ICES.—Section 2320 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to 

read as follows: 

‘‘§ 2320. Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services 

‘‘(a) OFFENSES.—Whoever intentionally— 

‘‘(1) traffics in goods or services and knowingly uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection with such goods or services, 

‘‘(2) traffics in labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, 

emblems, medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, 

hangtags, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature, 

knowing that a counterfeit mark has been applied thereto, the 

use of which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or 

to deceive, or 

‘‘(3) traffics in goods or services knowing that such good or 

service is a counterfeit military good or service the use, malfunction, or failure of which is likely to cause serious bodily injury or death, the disclosure of classified information, impairment of combat operations, or other significant harm to a combat operation, a member of the Armed Forces, or to national security, 

or attempts or conspires to violate any of paragraphs (1) through (3) 

shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). 

‘‘(b) PENALTIES.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
202 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Whoever commits an offense under subsection (a)— 

‘‘(A) if an individual, shall be fined not more than 

$2,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both, 

and, if a person other than an individual, shall be fined 

not more than $5,000,000; and 

‘‘(B) for a second or subsequent offense under subsection (a), if an individual, shall be fined not more than 

$5,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, 

and if other than an individual, shall be fined not more 

than $15,000,000. 

‘‘(2) SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH.— 

‘‘(A) SERIOUS BODILY INJURY.—Whoever knowingly or 

recklessly causes or attempts to cause serious bodily injury 

from conduct in violation of subsection (a), if an individual, 

shall be fined not more than $5,000,000 or imprisoned for 

not more than 20 years, or both, and if other than an individual, shall be fined not more than $15,000,000. 

‘‘(B) DEATH.—Whoever knowingly or recklessly causes 

or attempts to cause death from conduct in violation of subsection (a), if an individual, shall be fined not more than 

$5,000,000 or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, 

or both, and if other than an individual, shall be fined not 

more than $15,000,000. 

‘‘(3) COUNTERFEIT MILITARY GOODS OR SERVICES.—Whoever 

commits an offense under subsection (a) involving a counterfeit 

military good or service— 

‘‘(A) if an individual, shall be fined not more than 

$5,000,000, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, 

and if other than an individual, be fined not more than 

$15,000,000; and 

‘‘(B) for a second or subsequent offense, if an individual, shall be fined not more than $15,000,000, imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both, and if other than an 

individual, shall be fined not more than $30,000,000. 

‘‘(c) FORFEITURE AND DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY; RESTITUTION.—Forfeiture, destruction, and restitution relating to this section shall be subject to section 2323, to the extent provided in that 

section, in addition to any other similar remedies provided by law. 

‘‘(d) DEFENSES.—All defenses, affirmative defenses, and limitations on remedies that would be applicable in an action under the 

Lanham Act shall be applicable in a prosecution under this section. 

In a prosecution under this section, the defendant shall have the 

burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, of any such affirmative defense. 

‘‘(e) PRESENTENCE REPORT.—(1) During preparation of the 

presentence report pursuant to Rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure, victims of the offense shall be permitted to submit, and the probation officer shall receive, a victim impact statement that identifies the victim of the offense and the extent and 

scope of the injury and loss suffered by the victim, including the estimated economic impact of the offense on that victim. 

‘‘(2) Persons permitted to submit victim impact statements shall 

include— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
203 

‘‘(A) producers and sellers of legitimate goods or services affected by conduct involved in the offense; 

‘‘(B) holders of intellectual property rights in such goods or 

services; and 

‘‘(C) the legal representatives of such producers, sellers, and 

holders. 

‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section— 

‘‘(1) the term ‘counterfeit mark’ means— 

‘‘(A) a spurious mark— 

‘‘(i) that is used in connection with trafficking in 

any goods, services, labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, 

badges, emblems, medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature; 

‘‘(ii) that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a mark registered on the principal 

register in the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office and in use, whether or not the defendant knew 

such mark was so registered; 

‘‘(iii) that is applied to or used in connection with 

the goods or services for which the mark is registered 

with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 

or is applied to or consists of a label, patch, sticker, 

wrapper, badge, emblem, medallion, charm, box, container, can, case, hangtag, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature that is designed, marketed, 

or otherwise intended to be used on or in connection 

with the goods or services for which the mark is registered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and 

‘‘(iv) the use of which is likely to cause confusion, 

to cause mistake, or to deceive; or 

‘‘(B) a spurious designation that is identical with, or 

substantially indistinguishable from, a designation as to 

which the remedies of the Lanham Act are made available 

by reason of section 220506 of title 36; 

but such term does not include any mark or designation used 

in connection with goods or services, or a mark or designation 

applied to labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, 

medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, 

documentation, or packaging of any type or nature used in connection with such goods or services, of which the manufacturer 

or producer was, at the time of the manufacture or production 

in question, authorized to use the mark or designation for the 

type of goods or services so manufactured or produced, by the 

holder of the right to use such mark or designation; 

‘‘(2) the term ‘financial gain’ includes the receipt, or expected receipt, of anything of value; 

‘‘(3) the term ‘Lanham Act’ means the Act entitled ‘An Act 

to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks 

used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes’, approved July 5, 

1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.); 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
204 

‘‘(4) the term ‘counterfeit military good or service’ means a 

good or service that uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection 

with such good or service and that— 

‘‘(A) is falsely identified or labeled as meeting military 

specifications, or 

‘‘(B) is intended for use in a military or national security application; and 

‘‘(5) the term ‘traffic’ means to transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, to another, for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or to make, import, export, obtain 

control of, or possess, with intent to so transport, transfer, or 

otherwise dispose of. 

‘‘(g) LIMITATION ON CAUSE OF ACTION.—Nothing in this section 

shall entitle the United States to bring a criminal cause of action 

under this section for the repackaging of genuine goods or services 

not intended to deceive or confuse. 

‘‘(h) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—(1) Beginning with the first year 

after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Attorney General 

shall include in the report of the Attorney General to Congress on 

the business of the Department of Justice prepared pursuant to section 522 of title 28, an accounting, on a district by district basis, 

of the following with respect to all actions taken by the Department 

of Justice that involve trafficking in counterfeit labels for 

phonorecords, copies of computer programs or computer program 

documentation or packaging, copies of motion pictures or other 

audiovisual works (as defined in section 2318 of this title), criminal 

infringement of copyrights (as defined in section 2319 of this title), 

unauthorized fixation of and trafficking in sound recordings and 

music videos of live musical performances (as defined in section 

2319A of this title), or trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks (as defined in section 2320 of this title): 

‘‘(A) The number of open investigations. 

‘‘(B) The number of cases referred by the United States Customs Service. 

‘‘(C) The number of cases referred by other agencies or 

sources. 

‘‘(D) The number and outcome, including settlements, sentences, recoveries, and penalties, of all prosecutions brought 

under sections 2318, 2319, 2319A, and 2320 of title 18. 

‘‘(2)(A) The report under paragraph (1), with respect to criminal 

infringement of copyright, shall include the following: 

‘‘(i) The number of infringement cases in these categories: 

audiovisual (videos and films); audio (sound recordings); literary works (books and musical compositions); computer programs; video games; and, others. 

‘‘(ii) The number of online infringement cases. 

‘‘(iii) The number and dollar amounts of fines assessed in 

specific categories of dollar amounts. These categories shall be: 

no fines ordered; fines under $500; fines from $500 to $1,000; 

fines from $1,000 to $5,000; fines from $5,000 to $10,000; and 

fines over $10,000. 

‘‘(iv) The total amount of restitution ordered in all copyright infringement cases. 

‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘online infringement cases’ as 

used in paragraph (2) means those cases where the infringer— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
205 

‘‘(i) advertised or publicized the infringing work on the 

Internet; or 

‘‘(ii) made the infringing work available on the Internet for 

download, reproduction, performance, or distribution by other 

persons. 

‘‘(C) The information required under subparagraph (A) shall be 

submitted in the report required in fiscal year 2005 and thereafter. 

‘‘(i) TRANSSHIPMENT AND EXPORTATION.—No goods or services, 

the trafficking in of which is prohibited by this section, shall be 

transshipped through or exported from the United States. Any such 

transshipment or exportation shall be deemed a violation of section 

42 of an Act to provide for the registration of trademarks used in 

commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes, approved July 5, 1946 (commonly 

referred to as the ‘Trademark Act of 1946’ or the ‘Lanham Act’).’’. 

SEC. 819. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE WEAPON SYSTEMS ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2009. 

(a) REPEAL OF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE OF CERTAIN

MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS WITH ACTIONS ON TREAT- MENT OF SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS BEFORE MILESTONE APPROVAL.— Subsection (c) of section 204 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 

2366a note) is repealed. 

(b) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW PROGRAMS RECEIVING

WAIVER OF CERTAIN CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

2366b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding the 

following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The requirement in paragraph (2)(B) shall not apply to a 

program for which a certification was required pursuant to section 

2433a(c) of this title if the milestone decision authority— 

‘‘(A) determines in writing that— 

‘‘(i) the program has reached a stage in the acquisition 

process at which it would not be practicable to meet the certification component that was waived; and 

‘‘(ii) the milestone decision authority has taken appropriate alternative actions to address the underlying purposes of such certification component; and 

‘‘(B) submits the written determination, and an explanation 

of the basis for the determination, to the congressional defense 

committees.’’. 

SEC. 820. INCLUSION OF CONTRACTOR SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS IN 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PLANNING DOCUMENTS. 

(a) ELEMENTS IN QDR REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Section 118(d) 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4)— 

(A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(B) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) the roles and responsibilities that would be discharged by contractors.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘manpower and 

sustainment’’ and inserting ‘‘manpower, sustainment, and contractor support’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
206 

(3) in paragraph (8), by inserting ‘‘, and the scope of contractor support,’’ after ‘‘Defense Agencies’’. 

(b) CHAIRMAN OF JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ASSESSMENTS OF

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF ARMED FORCES.— 

(1) ASSESSMENTS UNDER CONTINGENCY PLANNING.—Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 153 of such title is amended— 

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 

subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following 

new subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) Identifying the support functions that are likely to require contractor performance under those contingency plans, 

and the risks associated with the assignment of such functions 

to contractors.’’. 

(2) ASSESSMENTS UNDER ADVICE ON REQUIREMENTS, PROGRAMS, AND BUDGET.—Paragraph (4)(E) of such subsection is 

amended by inserting ‘‘and contractor support’’ after ‘‘area of 

manpower’’. 

(3) ASSESSMENTS FOR BIENNIAL REVIEW OF NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(I) Assessment of the requirements for contractor support 

of the armed forces in conducting peacetime training, peacekeeping, overseas contingency operations, and major combat operations, and the risks associated with such support.’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘and the levels of 

support from allies and other friendly nations’’ and inserting ‘‘the levels of support from allies and other friendly nations, and the levels of contractor support’’. 

SEC. 821. AMENDMENT RELATING TO BUYING TENTS, TARPAULINS, OR 

COVERS FROM AMERICAN SOURCES. 

Section 2533a(b)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘(and the structural components thereof)’’ after 

‘‘tents’’. 

SEC. 822. REPEAL OF SUNSET OF AUTHORITY TO PROCURE FIRE RESISTANT RAYON FIBER FROM FOREIGN SOURCES FOR THE 

PRODUCTION OF UNIFORMS. 

Subsection (f) of section 829 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 229; 

10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is repealed. 

SEC. 823. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF POLITICAL INFORMATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2335. Prohibition on collection of political information 

‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF POLITICAL IN- FORMATION.—The head of an agency may not require a contractor 

to submit political information related to the contractor or a subcontractor at any tier, or any partner, officer, director, or employee of 

the contractor or subcontractor— 

‘‘(1) as part of a solicitation, request for bid, request for proposal, or any other form of communication designed to solicit 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
207 

offers in connection with the award of a contract for procurement of property or services; or 

‘‘(2) during the course of contract performance as part of 

the process associated with modifying a contract or exercising 

a contract option. 

‘‘(b) SCOPE.—The prohibition under this section applies to the 

procurement of commercial items, the procurement of commercialoff-the-shelf-items, and the non-commercial procurement of supplies, 

property, services, and manufactured items, irrespective of contract 

vehicle, including contracts, purchase orders, task or deliver orders 

under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, blanket purchase agreements, and basic ordering agreements. 

‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed as— 

‘‘(1) waiving, superseding, restricting, or limiting the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

431 et seq.) or preventing Federal regulatory or law enforcement 

agencies from collecting or receiving information authorized by 

law; or 

‘‘(2) precluding the Defense Contract Audit Agency from accessing and reviewing certain information, including political 

information, for the purpose of identifying unallowable costs 

and administering cost principles established pursuant to section 2324 of this title. 

‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘contractor’ includes contractors, bidders, and offerors, and individuals and legal entities 

who would reasonably be expected to submit offers or bids for 

Federal Government contracts. 

‘‘(2) POLITICAL INFORMATION.—The term ‘political information’ means information relating to political spending, including any payment consisting of a contribution, expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication that is made by the contractor, any of its partners, 

officers, directors or employees, or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries to a candidate or on behalf of a candidate for election 

for Federal office, to a political committee, to a political party, 

to a third party entity with the intention or reasonable expectation that it would use the payment to make independent expenditures or electioneering communications, or that is otherwise made with respect to any election for Federal office, party 

affiliation, and voting history. Each of the terms ‘contribution’, 

‘expenditure’, ‘independent expenditure’, ‘candidate’, ‘election’, 

‘electioneering communication’, and ‘Federal office’ has the 

meaning given the term in the Federal Campaign Act of 1971 

(2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 of such title is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 2334 the following new item: 

‘‘2335. Prohibition on collection of political information.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
208 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition 

Programs 

SEC. 831. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO NEW MILESTONE 

APPROVAL FOR CERTAIN MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION 

PROGRAMS EXPERIENCING CRITICAL COST GROWTH DUE 

TO CHANGE IN QUANTITY PURCHASED. 

Section 2433a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3)(A) The requirements of subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (1) shall not apply to a program or subprogram if— 

‘‘(i) the Milestone Decision Authority determines in writing, 

on the basis of a cost assessment and root cause analysis conducted pursuant to subsection (a), that— 

‘‘(I) but for a change in the quantity of items to be purchased under the program or subprogram, the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for the program 

or subprogram would not have increased by a percentage 

equal to or greater than the cost growth thresholds for the 

program or subprogram set forth in subparagraph (B); and 

‘‘(II) the change in quantity of items described in subclause (I) was not made as a result of an increase in program cost, a delay in the program, or a problem meeting 

program requirements; 

‘‘(ii) the Secretary determines in writing that the cost to the 

Department of Defense of complying with such requirements is 

likely to exceed the benefits to the Department of complying 

with such requirements; and 

‘‘(iii) the Secretary submits to Congress, before the end of 

the 60-day period beginning on the day the Selected Acquisition 

Report containing the information described in section 2433(g) 

of this title is required to be submitted under section 2432(f) of 

this title— 

‘‘(I) a copy of the written determination under clause (i) 

and an explanation of the basis for the determination; and 

‘‘(II) a copy of the written determination under clause 

(ii) and an explanation of the basis for the determination. 

‘‘(B) The cost growth thresholds specified in this subparagraph 

are as follows: 

‘‘(i) In the case of a major defense acquisition program or 

designated major defense subprogram, a percentage increase in 

the program acquisition unit cost for the program or subprogram of— 

‘‘(I) 5 percent over the program acquisition unit cost for 

the program or subprogram as shown in the current Baseline Estimate for the program or subprogram; and 

‘‘(II) 10 percent over the program acquisition unit cost 

for the program or subprogram as shown in the original 

Baseline Estimate for the program or subprogram. 

‘‘(ii) In the case of a major defense acquisition program or 

designated major defense subprogram that is a procurement 

program, a percentage increase in the procurement unit cost for 

the program or subprogram of— 

‘‘(I) 5 percent over the procurement unit cost for the 

program or subprogram as shown in the current Baseline 

Estimate for the program or subprogram; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
209 

‘‘(II) 10 percent over the procurement unit cost for the 

program or subprogram as shown in the original Baseline 

Estimate for the program or subprogram.’’. 

SEC. 832. ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT, AND CONTROL OF OPERATING 

AND SUPPORT COSTS FOR MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

(a) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

issue guidance on actions to be taken to assess, manage, and control 

Department of Defense costs for the operation and support of major 

weapon systems. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall, 

at a minimum— 

(1) be issued in conjunction with the comprehensive guidance on life-cycle management and the development and implementation of product support strategies for major weapon systems required by section 805 of the National Defenese Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2403; 10 U.S.C. 2301 note); 

(2) require the military departments to retain each estimate 

of operating and support costs that is developed at any time 

during the life cycle of a major weapon system, together with 

supporting documentation used to develop the estimate; 

(3) require the military departments to update estimates of 

operating and support costs periodically throughout the life 

cycle of a major weapon system, to determine whether preliminary information and assumptions remain relevant and accurate, and identify and record reasons for variances; 

(4) establish standard requirements for the collection of 

data on operating and support costs for major weapon systems 

and require the military departments to revise their Visibility 

and Management of Operating and Support Costs (VAMOSC) 

systems to ensure that they collect complete and accurate data 

in compliance with such requirements and make such data 

available in a timely manner; 

(5) establish standard requirements for the collection and 

reporting of data on operating and support costs for major 

weapon systems by contractors performing weapon system 

sustainment functions in an appropriate format, and develop 

contract clauses to ensure that contractors comply with such requirements; 

(6) require the military departments— 

(A) to collect and retain data from operational and developmental testing and evaluation on the reliability and 

maintainability of major weapon systems; and 

(B) to use such data to inform system design decisions, 

provide insight into sustainment costs, and inform estimates of operating and support costs for such systems; 

(7) require the military departments to ensure that 

sustainment factors are fully considered at key life cycle management decision points and that appropriate measures are 

taken to reduce operating and support costs by influencing system design early in development, developing sound sustainment 

strategies, and addressing key drivers of costs; 

(8) require the military departments to conduct an independent logistics assessment of each major weapon system prior 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
210 

to key acquisition decision points (including milestone decisions) to identify features that are likely to drive future operating and support costs, changes to system design that could reduce such costs, and effective strategies for managing such 

costs; 

(9) include— 

(A) reliability metrics for major weapon systems; and 

(B) requirements on the use of metrics under subparagraph (A) as triggers— 

(i) to conduct further investigation and analysis 

into drivers of those metrics; and 

(ii) to develop strategies for improving reliability, 

availability, and maintainability of such systems at an 

affordable cost; and 

(10) require the military departments to conduct periodic 

reviews of operating and support costs of major weapon systems 

after such systems achieve initial operational capability to identify and address factors resulting in growth in operating and 

support costs and adapt support strategies to reduce such costs. 

(c) RETENTION OF DATA ON OPERATING AND SUPPORT COSTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall be responsible for developing and maintaining a database on operating and support estimates, supporting documentation, and actual operating and support costs 

for major weapon systems. 

(2) SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 

the Director, in carrying out such responsibility— 

(A) promptly receives the results of all cost estimates 

and cost analyses conducted by the military departments 

with regard to operating and support costs of major weapon systems; 

(B) has timely access to any records and data of the 

military departments (including classified and proprietary 

information) that the Director considers necessary to carry 

out such responsibility; and 

(C) with the concurrence of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, may direct 

the military departments to collect and retain information 

necessary to support the database. 

(d) MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘major weapon system’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

2379(f) of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 833. CLARIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST ANALYSES 

AND TARGETS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PURPOSES. 

Section 2334(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; 

(2) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘shall provide that—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘cost estimates’’ and inserting ‘‘shall provide 

that cost estimates’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; and 

(C) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as paragraph 

(2) and moving such paragraph two ems to the left; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
211 

(3) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 

this section, by striking ‘‘cost analyses and targets’’ and inserting ‘‘The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall, in consultation with the Director of 

Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, develop policies, procedures, and guidance to ensure that cost analyses and targets’’; 

(4) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of 

this section, by striking ‘‘issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation’’ and inserting ‘‘issued by the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics under paragraph (2)’’; and 

(5) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of 

this section, by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)’’. 

SEC. 834. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GUIDANCE ON MANAGEMENT OF MANUFACTURING RISK IN MAJOR DEFENSE 

ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 

Section 812(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4264; 

10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘manufacturing readiness levels’’ each place 

it appears and inserting ‘‘manufacturing readiness levels or 

other manufacturing readiness standards’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 

(5) and (6), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): 

‘‘(4) provide for the tailoring of manufacturing readiness 

levels or other manufacturing readiness standards to address 

the unique characteristics of specific industry sectors or weapon 

system portfolios;’’. 

SEC. 835. MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION 

FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 

(a) CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER.—Section 820(a) of the 

John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2330), as amended by section 

805(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 110–181; 123 Stat. 2403), is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6): 

‘‘(6) Chief developmental tester.’’. 

(b) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER AND

LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.—Section 139b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) SUPPORT OF MDAPS BY CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER AND

LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.— 

‘‘(1) SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall require that 

each major defense acquisition program be supported by— 

‘‘(A) a chief developmental tester; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
212 

‘‘(B) a governmental test agency, serving as lead developmental test and evaluation organization for the program. 

‘‘(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF CHIEF DEVELOPMENTAL TESTER.— 

The chief developmental tester for a major defense acquisition 

program shall be responsible for— 

‘‘(A) coordinating the planning, management, and oversight of all developmental test and evaluation activities for 

the program; 

‘‘(B) maintaining insight into contractor activities 

under the program and overseeing the test and evaluation 

activities of other participating government activities under 

the program; and 

‘‘(C) helping program managers make technically informed, objective judgments about contractor developmental 

test and evaluation results under the program. 

‘‘(3) RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEAD DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND

EVALUATION ORGANIZATION.—The lead developmental test and 

evaluation organization for a major defense acquisition program shall be responsible for— 

‘‘(A) providing technical expertise on testing and evaluation issues to the chief developmental tester for the program; 

‘‘(B) conducting developmental testing and evaluation 

activities for the program, as directed by the chief developmental tester; and 

‘‘(C) assisting the chief developmental tester in providing oversight of contractors under the program and in 

reaching technically informed, objective judgments about 

contractor developmental test and evaluation results under 

the program.’’. 

SEC. 836. ASSESSMENT OF RISK ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF 

MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS TO BE PROCURED UNDER COOPERATIVE PROJECTS WITH FRIENDLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) ASSESSMENT OF RISK REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than two days after the President transmits a certification to Congress pursuant to section 

27(f) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2767(f)) regarding a proposed cooperative project agreement that is expected to 

result in the award of a Department of Defense contract for the 

engineering and manufacturing development of a major weapon 

system, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Chairmen 

of the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a report setting forth a risk assessment of the proposed cooperative project. 

(2) PREPARATION.—The Secretary shall prepare each report 

required by paragraph (1) in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, 

and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation 

of the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The risk assessment on a cooperative project 

under subsection (a) shall include the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
213 

(1) An assessment of the design, technical, manufacturing, 

and integration risks associated with developing and procuring 

the weapon system to be procured under the cooperative project. 

(2) A statement identifying any termination liability that 

would be incurred under the development contract to be entered 

into under subsection (a)(1), and a statement of the extent to 

which such termination liability would not be fully funded by 

appropriations available or sought in the fiscal year in which 

the agreement for the cooperative project is signed on behalf of 

the United States. 

(3) An assessment of the advisability of incurring any unfunded termination liability identified under paragraph (2) 

given the risks identified in the assessment under paragraph 

(1). 

(4) A listing of which, if any, requirements associated with 

the oversight and management of a major defense acquisition 

program (as prescribed under Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 or related authorities) will be waived, or in any 

way modified, in carrying out the development contract to be 

entered into under (a)(1), and a full explanation why such requirements need to be waived or modified. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘engineering and manufacturing development’’ 

has the meaning given that term in Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02. 

(2) The term ‘‘major weapon system’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 2379(f) of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 837. COMPETITION IN MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT OF SUBSYSTEMS OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

Section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act 

of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1721; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) 

is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘OPERATION AND

SUSTAINMENT OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS’’ and inserting 

‘‘MAINTENANCE AND SUSTAINMENT OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS

AND SUBSYSTEMS’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘or subsystem of a major weapon system’’ 

after ‘‘a major weapon system’’; and 

(3) by inserting ‘‘, or for components needed for such maintenance and sustainment,’’ after ‘‘such maintenance and 

sustainment’’. 

SEC. 838. OVERSIGHT OF AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM. 

The Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) redesignate the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 

program as a major defense acquisition program not in the 

sustainment phase under section 2430 of title 10, United States 

Code; or 

(2) require the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program— 

(A) to provide to the congressional defense committees 

all information with respect to the cost, schedule, and performance of the program that would be required to be provided under sections 2431 (relating to weapons development 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
214 

and procurement schedules), 2432 (relating to Select Acquisition Reports, including updated program life-cycle cost estimates), and 2433 (relating to unit cost reports) of title 10, 

United States Code, with respect to the program if the program were designated as a major defense acquisition program not in the sustainment phase; and 

(B) to provide to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics— 

(i) a quarterly cost and status report, commonly 

known as a Defense Acquisition Executive Summary, 

which serves as an early-warning of actual and potential problems with a program and provides for possible 

mitigation plans; and 

(ii) earned value management data that contains 

measurements of contractor technical, schedule, and 

cost performance. 

SEC. 839. IMPLEMENTATION OF ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR 

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2012, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional committees specified in 

subsection (c) the following information: 

(1) A description of how the strategy of the Department of 

Defense to acquire space launch capability under the Evolved 

Expendable Launch Vehicle program implements each of the 

recommendations included in the Report of the Government Accountability Office on the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle, 

dated September 15, 2011 (GAO–11–641). 

(2) With respect to any such recommendation that the Department does not implement, an explanation of how the Department is otherwise addressing the deficiencies identified in 

that report. 

(b) ASSESSMENT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.—Not later than 60 days after the submission of the information required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 

United States shall submit to the congressional committees specified 

in subsection (c) an assessment of that information and any additional findings or recommendations the Comptroller General considers appropriate. 

(c) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congressional committees specified in this subsection are the following: 

(1) The Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) The Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives. 

(3) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and 

the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of 

Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 

SEC. 841. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY IN THE 

UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND THEATER OF OPERATIONS. 

(a) PROHIBITION.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
215 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise 

the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to authorize the head of a contracting activity, 

pursuant to a request from the Commander of the United States 

Central Command under subsection (c)(2)— 

(A) to restrict the award of Department of Defense contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements that the head of 

the contracting activity determines in writing would provide funding directly or indirectly to a person or entity that 

has been identified by the Commander of the United States 

Central Command as actively supporting an insurgency or 

otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition forces 

in a contingency operation in the United States Central 

Command theater of operations; 

(B) to terminate for default any Department contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determination by the head of the contracting activity that the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that 

none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a 

person or entity who is actively supporting an insurgency 

or otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition 

forces in a contingency operation in the United States Central Command theater of operations; or 

(C) to void in whole or in part any Department contract, grant, or cooperative agreement upon a written determination by the head of the contracting activity that the 

contract, grant, or cooperative agreement provides funding 

directly or indirectly to a person or entity that has been 

identified by the Commander of the United States Central 

Command as actively supporting an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition forces in 

a contingency operation in the United States Central Command theater of operations. 

(2) TREATMENT AS VOID.—For purposes of this section: 

(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is 

void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy. 

(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is 

void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy 

with regard to a segregable task or effort under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. 

(b) CONTRACT CLAUSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that— 

(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 

agreement of the Department that is awarded on or after 

the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered 

contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department that is awarded before the date of the enactment of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
216 

this Act shall be modified to include the clause described 

in paragraph (2). 

(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— 

(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the grant 

or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence to ensure 

that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly 

to a person or entity who is actively supporting an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition forces in a contingency operation; and 

(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant 

or cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head of the 

contracting activity to terminate or void the contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part, as provided 

in subsection (a). 

(3) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement’’ means a contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement with an estimated value in excess of $100,000 that 

will be performed in the United States Central Command theater of operations. 

(c) IDENTIFICATION OF CONTRACTS WITH SUPPORTERS OF THE

ENEMY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the 

Commander of the United States Central Command, shall establish a program to use available intelligence to review persons 

and entities who receive United States funds through contracts, 

grants, and cooperative agreements performed in the United 

States Central Command theater of operations and identify any 

such persons and entities who are actively supporting an insurgency or otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition 

forces in a contingency operation. 

(2) NOTICE TO CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES.—If the Commander of the United States Central Command, acting pursuant to the program required by paragraph (1), identifies a person or entity as actively supporting an insurgency or otherwise 

actively opposing United States or coalition forces in a contingency operation, the Commander may notify the head of a contracting activity in writing of such identification and request 

that the head of the contracting activity exercise the authority 

provided in subsection (a) with regard to any contracts, grants, 

or cooperative agreements that provide funding directly or indirectly to the person or entity. 

(3) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Classified 

information relied upon by the Commander of the United States 

Central Command to make an identification in accordance with 

this subsection may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to which 

an action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in subsection (a), or to their representatives, in the absence of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
217 

that specifically addresses the conditions upon which such classified information may be so disclosed. 

(d) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES.— (1) CONTRACT ACTIONS.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to restrict, terminate, or void contracts, grants, and 

cooperative agreements may not be delegated below the level of 

the head of a contracting activity. 

(2) IDENTIFICATION OF SUPPORT OF ENEMY.—The authority 

to make an identification under subsection (c)(1) may not be 

delegated below the level of the Commander of the United 

States Central Command. 

(e) REPORTS.—Not later than March 1 of each of 2013, 2014, 

and 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the use of the authority provided by this section in the preceding calendar year. Each report shall identify, for 

the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in which the 

Department of Defense exercised the authority to restrict, terminate, 

or void contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements pursuant to 

subsection (a) and explain the basis for the action taken. Any report 

under this subsection may be submitted in classified form. 

(f) OTHER DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘contingency 

operation’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of 

title 10, United States Code. 

(g) SUNSET.—The authority to restrict, terminate, or void contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements pursuant to subsection 

(a) shall cease to be effective on the date that is three years after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 842. ADDITIONAL ACCESS TO CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR RECORDS IN THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL 

COMMAND THEATER OF OPERATIONS. 

(a) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTS, GRANTS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise 

the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that— 

(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 

agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded on 

or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered 

contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department that is awarded before the date of the enactment of 

this Act shall be modified to include the clause described 

in paragraph (2). 

(2) CLAUSE.—The clause described in this paragraph is a 

clause authorizing the Secretary, upon a written determination 

pursuant to paragraph (3), to examine any records of the contractor, the recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement, or any 

subcontractor or subgrantee under such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement to the extent necessary to ensure that funds 

available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement— 

(A) are not subject to extortion or corruption; and 

(B) are not provided directly or indirectly to persons or 

entities that are actively supporting an insurgency or otherVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00247 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
218 

wise actively opposing United States or coalition forces in 

a contingency operation. 

(3) WRITTEN DETERMINATION.—The authority to examine 

records pursuant to the contract clause described in paragraph 

(2) may be exercised only upon a written determination by the 

contracting officer or comparable official responsible for a grant 

or cooperative agreement, upon a finding by the Commander of 

the United States Central Command, that there is reason to believe that funds available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement concerned may have been subject to extortion or 

corruption or may have been provided directly or indirectly to 

persons or entities that are actively supporting an insurgency or 

otherwise actively opposing United States or coalition forces in 

a contingency operation. 

(4) FLOWDOWN.—A clause described in paragraph (2) shall 

also be required in any subcontract or subgrant under a covered 

contract, grant, or cooperative agreement if the subcontract or 

subgrant has an estimated value in excess of $100,000. 

(b) REPORTS.—Not later than March 1 of each of 2013, 2014, 

and 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the use of the authority provided by this section in the preceding calendar year. Each report shall identify, for 

the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in which the 

Department of Defense exercised the authority provided under this 

section to examine records, explain the basis for the action taken, 

and summarize the results of any examination of records so undertaken, Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classified form. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘contingency operation’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement’’ means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with 

an estimated value in excess of $100,000 that will be performed 

in the United States Central Command theater of operations in 

support of a contingency operation. 

(d) SUNSET.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The clause described by subsection (a)(2) 

shall not be required in any contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement that is awarded after the date that is three years 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) CONTINUING EFFECT OF CLAUSES INCLUDED BEFORE

SUNSET.—Any clause described by subsection (a)(2) that is included in a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement pursuant 

to this section before the date specified in paragraph (1) shall 

remain in effect in accordance with its terms. 

SEC. 843. REACH-BACK CONTRACTING AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION 

ENDURING FREEDOM AND OPERATION NEW DAWN. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE LEAD CONTRACTING ACTIVITY.— 

The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics may designate a single contracting activity inside the United 

States to act as the lead contracting activity with authority for use 

of domestic capabilities in support of overseas contracting for Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation New Dawn. The conVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00248 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
219 

tracting activity so designated shall be known as the ‘‘lead reachback contracting authority’’ for such operations. 

(b) LIMITED AUTHORITY FOR USE OF OUTSIDE-THE-UNITED- STATES-THRESHOLDS.—The head of the contracting authority designated pursuant to subsection (a) may, when awarding a contract 

inside the United States for performance in the theater of operations 

for Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation New Dawn, use the 

overseas increased micro-purchase threshold and the overseas increased simplified acquisition threshold in the same manner and to 

the same extent as if the contract were to be awarded and performed 

outside the United States. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘overseas increased micro-purchase threshold’’ 

means the amount specified in paragraph (1)(B) of section 

1903(b) of title 41, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘overseas increased simplified acquisition 

threshold’’ means the amount specified in paragraph (2)(B) of 

section 1903(b) of title 41, United States Code. 

SEC. 844. COMPETITION AND REVIEW OF CONTRACTS FOR PROPERTY 

OR SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF A CONTINGENCY OPERATION. 

(a) CONTRACTING GOALS.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) establish goals for competition in contracts awarded by 

the Secretary of Defense for the procurement of property or services to be used outside the United States in support of a contingency operation; and 

(2) develop processes by which to measure and monitor 

such competition, including in task-order categories for services, 

construction, and supplies. 

(b) ANNUAL REVIEW OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS.—For each year 

the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program contract, or other similar 

omnibus contract awarded by the Secretary of Defense for the procurement of property or services to be used outside the United States 

in support of a contingency operation, is in force, the Secretary shall 

require a competition advocate of the Department of Defense to conduct an annual review of each such contract. 

(c) ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTRACTING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANI- STAN.— Section 863(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2008 (110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) through (H) as subparagraphs (G) through (I), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new 

subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) Percentage of contracts awarded on a competitive 

basis as compared to established goals for competition in 

contingency contracting actions.’’. 

SEC. 845. INCLUSION OF ASSOCIATED SUPPORT SERVICES IN RAPID 

ACQUISITION AND DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURES FOR SUPPLIES. 

(a) INCLUSION.—Section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) 

is amended by striking ‘‘supplies’’ each place it appears (other than 

subsections (a)(1)(B) and (f)) and inserting ‘‘supplies and associated 

support services’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
220 

(b) DEFINITION.—Such section is further amended by adding at 

the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) ASSOCIATED SUPPORT SERVICES DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘associated support services’ means training, operation, 

maintenance, and support services needed in connection with the deployment of supplies to be acquired pursuant to the authority of this 

section. The term does not include functions that are inherently governmental or otherwise exempted from private sector performance.’’. 

(c) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY.—The authority 

to acquire associated support services pursuant to section 806 of the 

Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2003, as amended by this section, shall not take effect until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees 

that the Secretary has developed and implemented an expedited review process in compliance with the requirements of section 804 of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4256; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). 

SEC. 846. JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND TO RAPIDLY 

MEET URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 131 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 2216 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 2216a. Rapidly meeting urgent needs: Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the Treasury an 

account to be known as the ‘Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund’ 

(in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’). 

‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The Fund shall consist of the following: 

‘‘(1) Amounts appropriated to the Fund. 

‘‘(2) Amounts transferred to the Fund. 

‘‘(3) Any other amounts made available to the Fund by law. 

‘‘(c) USE OF FUNDS.—(1) Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary of Defense for capabilities that are determined 

by the Secretary, pursuant to the review process required by section 

804(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note), to be suitable for rapid 

fielding in response to urgent operational needs. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary shall establish a merit-based process for 

identifying equipment, supplies, services, training, and facilities 

suitable for funding through the Fund. 

‘‘(3) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require or enable any official of the Department of Defense to provide funding 

under this section pursuant to a congressional earmark, as defined 

in clause 9 of Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, 

or a congressionally directed spending item, as defined in paragraph 5 of Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate. 

‘‘(d) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—(1) Amounts in the Fund may be 

transferred by the Secretary of Defense from the Fund to any of the 

following accounts of the Department of Defense to accomplish the 

purpose stated in subsection (c): 

‘‘(A) Operation and maintenance accounts. 

‘‘(B) Procurement accounts. 

‘‘(C) Research, development, test, and evaluation accounts. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
221 

‘‘(2) Upon determination by the Secretary that all or part of the 

amounts transferred from the Fund under paragraph (1) are not 

necessary for the purpose for which transferred, such amounts may 

be transferred back to the Fund. 

‘‘(3) The transfer of an amount to an account under the authority in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount so transferred. 

‘‘(4) The transfer authority provided by paragraphs (1) and (2) 

is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense by law. 

‘‘(e) SUNSET.—The authority to make expenditures or transfers 

from the Fund shall expire on the last day of the third fiscal year 

that begins after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting 

after the item relating to section 2216 the following new item: 

‘‘2216a. Rapidly meeting urgent needs: Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON COMMENCEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FROM

FUND.—No expenditure may be made from the Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund established by section 2216a of title 10, United 

States Code (as added by subsection (a)), until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has developed and implemented an expedited review process 

in compliance with the requirements of section 804 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4256; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). 

Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

SEC. 851. ASSESSMENT OF THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE PILOT 

PROGRAM. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the defense industrial base pilot program of the Department 

of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of the defense industrial base pilot program. 

(2) An assessment of the legal, policy, or regulatory challenges associated with effectively executing the pilot program. 

(3) Recommendations for changes to the legal, policy, or 

regulatory framework for the pilot program to make it more effective. 

(4) A description of any plans to expand the pilot program, 

including to other sectors beyond the defense industrial base. 

(5) An assessment of the potential legal, policy, or regulatory challenges associated with expanding the pilot program. 

(6) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
222 

SEC. 852. STRATEGY FOR SECURING THE DEFENSE SUPPLY CHAIN 

AND INDUSTRIAL BASE. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 

that the annual report to Congress on the defense industrial base 

submitted for fiscal year 2012 pursuant to section 2504 of title 10, 

United States Code, includes a description of, and a status report 

on, the sector-by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment of the industrial base 

undertaken by the Department of Defense. 

(b) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 

(a) shall include, at a minimum, a description of the steps taken 

and planned to be taken— 

(1) to identify current and emerging sectors of the defense 

industrial base that are critical to the national security of the 

United States; 

(2) in each sector, to identify items that are critical to military readiness, including key components, subcomponents, and 

materials; 

(3) to examine the structure of the industrial base, including the competitive landscape, relationships, risks, and opportunities within that structure; 

(4) to map the supply chain for critical items identified 

under paragraph (2) in a manner that provides the Department 

of Defense visibility from raw material to final products; 

(5) to perform a risk assessment of the supply chain for 

such critical items and conduct an evaluation of the extent to 

which— 

(A) the supply chain for such items is subject to disruption by factors outside the control of the Department of Defense; and 

(B) such disruption would adversely affect the ability of 

the Department of Defense to fill its national security mission. 

(c) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Based on the findings from the sector-by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment, as described in the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a defense supply chain and industrial base strategy to ensure the continued availability of items that are determined by the Secretary to be 

critical to military readiness and to be subject to significant supply 

chain risk. The strategy shall be based on a prioritized assessment 

of risks and challenges to the defense supply chain and industrial 

base and shall, at a minimum, address— 

(1) mitigation strategies needed to address any gaps or 

vulnerabilities in the relevant sectors of the defense industrial 

base; 

(2) the need for timely mobilization and capacity in such 

sectors of the defense industrial base; and 

(3) any other steps needed to foster and safeguard such sectors of the defense industrial base. 

(d) FOLLOW-UP REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 

that the annual report to Congress on the defense industrial base 

submitted for each of fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 includes an 

update on the steps taken by the Department of Defense to act on 

the findings of the sector-by-sector, tier-by-tier assessment of the industrial base and implement the strategy required by subsection (c). 

Such updates shall, at a minimum— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
223 

(1) be conducted based on current mapping of the supply 

chain and industrial base structure, including an analysis of 

the competitive landscape, relationships, risks, and opportunities within that structure; and 

(2) take into account any changes or updates to the National Defense Strategy, National Military Strategy, national 

counterterrorism policy, homeland security policy, and applicable operational or contingency plans. 

SEC. 853. ASSESSMENT OF FEASABILITY AND ADVISABILITY OF ESTABLISHMENT OF RARE EARTH MATERIAL INVENTORY. 

(a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Defense Logistics 

Agency Strategic Materials shall submit to the Secretary of Defense 

an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing an 

inventory of rare earth materials necessary to ensure the long-term 

availability of such rare earth materials. The assessment shall— 

(1) identify and describe the steps necessary to create an inventory of rare earth materials, including oxides, metals, alloys, 

and magnets, to support national defense requirements and ensure reliable sources of such materials for defense purposes; 

(2) provide a detailed cost-benefit analysis of creating such 

an inventory in accordance with Office of Management and 

Budget Circular A–94; 

(3) provide an analysis of the potential market effects, including effects on the pricing and commercial availability of 

such rare earth materials, associated with creating such an inventory; 

(4) identify and describe the mechanisms available to the 

Administrator to make such an inventory accessible, including 

by purchase, to entities requiring such rare earth materials to 

support national defense requirements, including producers of 

end items containing rare earth materials; 

(5) provide a detailed explanation of the ability of the Administrator to authorize the sale of excess materials to support 

a Rare Earth Material Stockpile Inventory Program; 

(6) analyze any potential requirements to amend or revise 

the Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials Annual Material Plan for Fiscal Year 2012 and subsequent years to reflect 

an inventory of rare earth materials to support national defense 

requirements; 

(7) identify and describe the steps necessary to develop or 

maintain a competitive, multi-source supply-chain to avoid reliance on a single source of supply; 

(8) identify and describe supply sources considered by the 

Administrator to be reliable, including an analysis of the capabilities of such sources to produce such materials in forms required for military applications in the next five years, as well 

as the security of upstream supply for these sources of material; 

and 

(9) include such other considerations and recommendations 

as necessary to support the establishment of such inventory. 

(b) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date on 

which the assessment is submitted under subsection (a), the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
224 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees— 

(A) the findings and recommendations from the assessment required under subsection (a); 

(B) a description of any actions the Secretary intends 

to take regarding the plans, strategies, policies, regulations, 

or resourcing of the Department of Defense as a result of 

the findings and recommendations from such assessment; 

and 

(C) any recommendations for legislative or regulatory 

changes needed to ensure the long-term availability of such 

rare earth materials. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘rare earth’’ means any of the following chemical elements in any of their physical forms or chemical combinations and alloys: 

(A) Scandium. 

(B) Yttrium. 

(C) Lanthanum. 

(D) Cerium. 

(E) Praseodymium. 

(F) Neodymium. 

(G) Promethium. 

(H) Samarium. 

(I) Europium. 

(J) Gadolinium. 

(K) Terbium. 

(L) Dysprosium. 

(M) Holmium. 

(N) Erbium. 

(O) Thulium. 

(P) Ytterbium. 

(Q) Lutetium. 

(2) The term ‘‘capability’’ means the required facilities, 

manpower, technological knowledge, and intellectual property 

necessary for the efficient and effective production of rare earth 

materials. 

SEC. 854. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRIAL 

BASE FOR NIGHT VISION IMAGE INTENSIFICATION SENSORS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall undertake an assessment of the current and long-term availability within the United 

States and international industrial base of critical equipment, components, subcomponents, and materials (including, but not limited 

to, lenses, tubes, and electronics) needed to support current and future United States military requirements for night vision image intensification sensors. In carrying out the assessment, the Secretary 

shall— 

(1) identify items in connection with night vision image intensification sensors that the Secretary determines are critical 

to military readiness, including key components, subcomponents, and materials; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
225 

(2) describe and perform a risk assessment of the supply 

chain for items identified under paragraph (1) and evaluate the 

extent to which— 

(A) the supply chain for such items could be disrupted 

by a loss of industrial capability in the United States; and 

(B) the industrial base obtains such items from foreign 

sources; 

(3) describe and assess current and future investment, gaps, 

and vulnerabilities in the ability of the Department to respond 

to the potential loss of domestic or international sources that 

provide items identified under paragraph (1); and 

(4) identify and assess current strategies to leverage innovative night vision image intensification technologies being pursued in both Department of Defense laboratories and the private 

sector for the next generation of night vision capabilities, including an assessment of the competitiveness and technological 

advantages of the United States night vision image intensification industrial base. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the assessment required 

under subsection (a). 

SEC. 855. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO RESPONSIBILITIES 

OF DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR 

MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL BASE POLICY. 

Section 139e(b)(12) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘titles I and II’’ and inserting ‘‘titles I and III’’. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 861. CLARIFICATION OF JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURTS TO HEAR BID PROTEST DISPUTES INVOLVING MARITIME CONTRACTS. 

(a) EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION.—Section 1491(b) of title 28, 

United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) Jurisdiction over any action described in paragraph (1) 

arising out of a maritime contract, or a solicitation for a proposed maritime contract, shall be governed by this section and 

shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of the district courts of 

the United States under the Suits in Admiralty Act (chapter 

309 of title 46) or the Public Vessels Act (chapter 311 of title 

46).’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply to any cause of action filed on or after the first day of 

the first month beginning more than 30 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 862. ENCOURAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, 

ENGINEERING, AND MATH (STEM) PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall develop programs and incentives to ensure that Department of Defense contractors take appropriate steps to— 

(1) enhance undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs in science, technology, engineering and math (in this section referred to as ‘‘STEM’’ disciplines); 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
226 

(2) make investments, such as programming and curriculum development, in STEM programs within elementary 

and secondary schools; 

(3) encourage employees to volunteer in Title I schools in 

order to enhance STEM education and programs; 

(4) make personnel available to advise and assist faculty at 

such colleges and universities in the performance of STEM research and disciplines critical to the functions of the Department of Defense; 

(5) establish partnerships between the offeror and historically Black colleges and universities and minority institutions 

for the purpose of training students in scientific disciplines; 

(6) award scholarships and fellowships, and establish cooperative work-education programs in scientific disciplines; or 

(7) conduct recruitment activities at historically black colleges and universities and other minority-serving institutions or 

offer internships or apprenticeships. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the steps taken to implement the requirements of this section. 

SEC. 863. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON AUTHORITIES AVAILABLE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR MULTIYEAR 

CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ALTERNATIVE 

FUELS. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 

(1) The procurement of alternative fuels by the Department 

of Defense through the use of long-term contracts can provide 

stability for industry, which could attract investment needed to 

develop alternative fuel sources. 

(2) In appropriate circumstances, and with appropriate protections, the use of long-term contracts for alternative fuels can 

be in the best interest of the Department if the costs of these 

contracts are competitive with other fuel contracts. 

(3) The Department has asked for the authority to enter 

into long-term contracts for alternative fuels. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the 

Department of Defense should continue to pursue long-term contracting authority for alternative fuels, as well as traditional fuels, 

if the contracts will satisfy military requirements and result in 

equal or less cost to the Department over their duration. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the authorities currently 

available to the Department of Defense for multiyear contracts for 

the purchase of alternative fuels, including advanced biofuels. The 

report shall include a description of such additional authorities, if 

any, as the Secretary considers appropriate to authorize the Department to enter into contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels, including advanced biofuels, of sufficient length to reduce the impact 

to the Department of future price or supply shocks in the petroleum 

market, to benefit taxpayers, and to reduce United States dependence on foreign oil. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
227 

SEC. 864. ACQUISITION WORKFORCE IMPROVEMENTS. 

(a) WORKFORCE IMPROVEMENTS.—Section 1704(b) of title 41, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting after the first sentence the following: ‘‘The 

Associate Administrator shall be chosen on the basis of demonstrated knowledge and expertise in acquisition, human capital, and management.’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘The Associate Administrator for Acquisition 

Workforce Programs shall be located in the Federal Acquisition 

Institute (or its successor).’’ and inserting ‘‘The Associate Administrator shall be located in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.’’; 

(3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a 

semicolon; 

(4) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and 

(5) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) implementing workforce programs under subsections (f) 

through (l) of section 1703 of this title; and’’. 

(b) FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Division B of subtitle I of title 41, United 

States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 11 the following new chapter: 

‘‘CHAPTER 12—FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘1201. Federal Acquisition Institute. 

‘‘§ 1201. Federal Acquisition Institute 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a Federal Acquisition 

Institute (FAI) in order to— 

‘‘(1) foster and promote the development of a professional 

acquisition workforce Government-wide; 

‘‘(2) promote and coordinate Government-wide research and 

studies to improve the procurement process and the laws, policies, methods, regulations, procedures, and forms relating to acquisition by the executive agencies; 

‘‘(3) collect data and analyze acquisition workforce data 

from the Office of Personnel Management, the heads of executive agencies, and, through periodic surveys, from individual 

employees; 

‘‘(4) periodically analyze acquisition career fields to identify 

critical competencies, duties, tasks, and related academic prerequisites, skills, and knowledge; 

‘‘(5) coordinate and assist agencies in identifying and recruiting highly qualified candidates for acquisition fields; 

‘‘(6) develop instructional materials for acquisition personnel in coordination with private and public acquisition colleges and training facilities; 

‘‘(7) evaluate the effectiveness of training and career development programs for acquisition personnel; 

‘‘(8) promote the establishment and utilization of academic 

programs by colleges and universities in acquisition fields; 

‘‘(9) facilitate, to the extent requested by agencies, interagency intern and training programs; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
228 

‘‘(10) collaborate with other civilian agency acquisition 

training programs to leverage training supporting all members 

of the civilian agency acquisition workforce; 

‘‘(11) assist civilian agencies with their acquisition and capital planning efforts; and 

‘‘(12) perform other career management or research functions as directed by the Administrator. 

‘‘(b) BUDGET RESOURCES AND AUTHORITY.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall recommend to 

the Administrator of General Services sufficient budget resources and authority for the Federal Acquisition Institute to 

support Government-wide training standards and certification 

requirements necessary to enhance the mobility and career opportunities of the Federal acquisition workforce. 

‘‘(2) ACQUISITION WORKFORCE TRAINING FUND.—Subject to 

the availability of funds, the Administrator of General Services 

shall provide the Federal Acquisition Institute with amounts 

from the acquisition workforce training fund established under 

section 1703(i) of this title sufficient to meet the annual budget 

for the Federal Acquisition Institute requested by the Administrator under paragraph (1). 

‘‘(c) FEDERAL ACQUISITION INSTITUTE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.— 

‘‘(1) REPORTING TO ADMINISTRATOR.—The Federal Acquisition Institute shall report through its Board of Directors directly to the Administrator. 

‘‘(2) COMPOSITION.—The Board shall be composed of not 

more than 8 individuals from the Federal Government representing a mix of acquisition functional areas, all of whom 

shall be appointed by the Administrator. 

‘‘(3) DUTIES.—The Board shall provide general direction to 

the Federal Acquisition Institute to ensure that the Institute— 

‘‘(A) meets its statutory requirements; 

‘‘(B) meets the needs of the Federal acquisition workforce; 

‘‘(C) implements appropriate programs; 

‘‘(D) coordinates with appropriate organizations and 

groups that have an impact on the Federal acquisition 

workforce; 

‘‘(E) develops and implements plans to meet future 

challenges of the Federal acquisition workforce; and 

‘‘(F) works closely with the Defense Acquisition University. 

‘‘(4) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The Board shall make recommendations to the Administrator regarding the development 

and execution of the annual budget of the Federal Acquisition 

Institute. 

‘‘(d) DIRECTOR.—The Director of the Federal Acquisition Institute shall be appointed by, be subject to the direction and control 

of, and report directly to the Administrator. 

‘‘(e) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Administrator shall submit to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and 

the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives an annual report on the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
229 

projected budget needs and expense plans of the Federal Acquisition 

Institute to fulfill its mandate.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents at the beginning of subtitle I of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to chapter 11 the following new item: 

‘‘12. Federal Acquisition Institute ...................................................................1201.’’. 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (5) of section 

1122(a) of such title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(5) providing for and directing the activities of the Federal 

Acquisition Institute established under section 1201 of this title, 

including recommending to the Administrator of General Services a sufficient budget for such activities.’’. 

(c) GOVERNMENT-WIDE TRAINING STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION.—Section 1703 of such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The Administrator shall’’ and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) GOVERNMENT-WIDE TRAINING STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION.—The Administrator, acting through the Federal Acquisition Institute, shall provide and update government-wide training standards and certification requirements, including— 

‘‘(i) developing and modifying acquisition certification programs; 

‘‘(ii) ensuring quality assurance for agency implementation of government-wide training and certification standards; 

‘‘(iii) analyzing the acquisition training curriculum 

to ascertain if all certification competencies are covered 

or if adjustments are necessary; 

‘‘(iv) developing career path information for certified professionals to encourage retention in government positions; 

‘‘(v) coordinating with the Office of Personnel Management for human capital efforts; and 

‘‘(vi) managing rotation assignments to support opportunities to apply skills included in certification.’’; 

and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(l) ACQUISITION INTERNSHIP AND TRAINING PROGRAMS.—All 

Federal civilian agency acquisition internship or acquisition training programs shall follow guidelines provided by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy to ensure consistent training standards necessary to develop uniform core competencies throughout the Federal 

Government.’’. 

(d) EXPANDED SCOPE OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE TRAINING

FUND.—Section 1703(i) of such title is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘to support the training of 

the acquisition workforce of the executive agencies’’ and inserting ‘‘to support the activities set forth in section 1201(a) of this 

title’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
230 

(2) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘ensure that amounts collected for training under this subsection are not used for a purpose other than the purpose specified in paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘ensure that amounts collected under this section are 

not used for a purpose other than the activities set forth in section 1201(a) of this title’’. 

(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section, or the 

amendments made by this section, shall be construed to preclude 

the Secretary of Defense from establishing acquisition workforce 

policies, procedures, training standards, and certification requirements for acquisition positions in the Department of Defense, as provided in chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 865. MODIFICATION OF DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE 

DETERMINATIONS ON ENTRY INTO COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH NATO 

AND OTHER FRIENDLY ORGANIZATIONS AND COUNTRIES. 

Section 2350a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘and to one other official of the Department of Defense’’ 

and inserting ‘‘, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

for Research and Engineering’’. 

SEC. 866. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEST PROGRAM FOR NEGOTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLANS. 

(a) THREE-YEAR EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of section 834 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 

1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

(b) ADDITIONAL REPORT.—Subsection (f) of such section is 

amended by inserting ‘‘and March 1, 2012,’’ after ‘‘March 1, 1994,’’. 

SEC. 867. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAM. 

Section 831(j) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ and 

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION 

AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revision of defense business systems requirements. 

Sec. 902. Qualifications for appointments to the position of Deputy Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 903. Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal responsibility for airship programs. 

Sec. 904. Memoranda of agreement on identification and dedication of enabling capabilities of general purpose forces to fulfill certain requirements of special operations forces. 

Sec. 905. Assessment of Department of Defense access to non-United States citizens 

with scientific and technical expertise vital to the national security interests. 

Sec. 906. Sense of Congress on use of modeling and simulation in Department of Defense activities. 

Sec. 907. Sense of Congress on ties between Joint Warfighting and Coalition Center 

and Allied Command Transformation of NATO. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
231 

Sec. 908. Report on effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint Warfare 

Analysis Center on personnel skills. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning System. 

Sec. 912. Authority to designate increments or blocks of satellites as major subprograms subject to acquisition reporting requirements. 

Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 

Sec. 921. Report on implementation of recommendations by the Comptroller General 

on intelligence information sharing. 

Sec. 922. Insider threat detection. 

Sec. 923. Expansion of authority for exchanges of mapping, charting, and geodetic 

data to include nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions. 

Sec. 924. Ozone Widget Framework. 

Sec. 925. Plan for incorporation of enterprise query and correlation capability into 

the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise. 

Sec. 926. Facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities abroad. 

Subtitle D—Total Force Management 

Sec. 931. General policy for total force management. 

Sec. 932. Revisions to Department of Defense civilian personnel management constraints. 

Sec. 933. Additional amendments relating to total force management. 

Sec. 934. Modifications of annual defense manpower requirements report. 

Sec. 935. Revisions to strategic workforce plan. 

Sec. 936. Amendments to requirement for inventory of contracts for services. 

Sec. 937. Preliminary planning and duration of public-private competitions. 

Sec. 938. Conversion of certain functions from contractor performance to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 

Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related Matters 

Sec. 941. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assessment of contingency plans. 

Sec. 942. Quadrennial defense review. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 951. Activities to improve multilateral, bilateral, and regional cooperation regarding cybersecurity. 

Sec. 952. Report on United States Special Operations Command structure. 

Sec. 953. Strategy to acquire capabilities to detect previously unknown cyber attacks. 

Sec. 954. Military activities in cyberspace. 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

SEC. 901. REVISION OF DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘§ 2222. Defense business systems: architecture, accountability, and modernization 

‘‘(a) CONDITIONS FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR COVERED DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM PROGRAMS.—Funds available to the Department of Defense, whether appropriated or non-appropriated, 

may not be obligated for a defense business system program that 

will have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the 

current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under 

section 221 of this title unless— 

‘‘(1) the appropriate pre-certification authority for the covered defense business system program has determined that— 

‘‘(A) the defense business system program is in compliance with the enterprise architecture developed under subVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00261 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
232 

section (c) and appropriate business process re-engineering 

efforts have been undertaken to ensure that— 

‘‘(i) the business process supported by the defense 

business system program is or will be as streamlined 

and efficient as practicable; and 

‘‘(ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems to meet unique requirements or incorporate 

unique requirements or incorporate unique interfaces 

has been eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent 

practicable; 

‘‘(B) the defense business system program is necessary 

to achieve a critical national security capability or address 

a critical requirement in an area such as safety or security; 

or 

‘‘(C) the defense business system program is necessary 

to prevent a significant adverse effect on a project that is 

needed to achieve an essential capability, taking into consideration the alternative solutions for preventing such adverse effect; 

‘‘(2) the covered defense business system program has been 

reviewed and certified by the investment review board established under subsection (g); and 

‘‘(3) the certification of the investment review board under 

paragraph (2) has been approved by the Defense Business Systems Management Committee established by section 186 of this 

title. 

‘‘(b) OBLIGATION OF FUNDS IN VIOLATION OF REQUIREMENTS.— 

The obligation of Department of Defense funds for a covered defense 

business system program that has not been certified and approved 

in accordance with subsection (a) is a violation of section 

1341(a)(1)(A) of title 31. 

‘‘(c) ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Defense 

Business Systems Management Committee, shall develop— 

‘‘(A) an enterprise architecture, known as the defense business enterprise architecture, to cover all defense business systems, and the functions and activities supported by defense 

business systems, which shall be sufficiently defined to effectively guide, constrain, and permit implementation of interoperable defense business system solutions and consistent with the 

policies and procedures established by the Director of the Office 

of Management and Budget; and 

‘‘(B) a transition plan for implementing the defense business enterprise architecture. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate responsibility and 

accountability for the defense business enterprise architecture content, including unambiguous definitions of functional processes, 

business rules, and standards, as follows: 

‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall be responsible and accountable for 

the content of those portions of the defense business enterprise 

architecture that support acquisition, logistics, installations, environment, or safety and occupational health activities of the 

Department of Defense. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
233 

‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall be 

responsible and accountable for the content of those portions of 

the defense business enterprise architecture that support financial management activities or strategic planning and budgeting 

activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness shall be responsible and accountable for the content 

of those portions of the defense business enterprise architecture 

that support human resource management activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(D) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content of 

those portions of the defense business enterprise architecture 

that support information technology infrastructure or information assurance activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(E) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be responsible and accountable for developing and maintaining the defense business enterprise architecture as well as integrating business operations covered by subparagraphs (A) through (D). 

‘‘(d) COMPOSITION OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.—The defense 

business enterprise architecture developed under subsection (c)(1)(A) 

shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) An information infrastructure that, at a minimum, 

would enable the Department of Defense to— 

‘‘(A) comply with all applicable law, including Federal 

accounting, financial management, and reporting requirements; 

‘‘(B) routinely produce timely, accurate, and reliable 

business and financial information for management purposes; 

‘‘(C) integrate budget, accounting, and program information and systems; and 

‘‘(D) provide for the systematic measurement of performance, including the ability to produce timely, relevant, 

and reliable cost information. 

‘‘(2) Policies, procedures, data standards, performance 

measures, and system interface requirements that are to apply 

uniformly throughout the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(3) A target defense business systems computing environment, compliant with the defense business enterprise architecture, for each of the major business processes conducted by the 

Department of Defense, as determined by the Chief Management 

Officer of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(e) COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN.—The transition plan 

developed under subsection (c)(1)(B) shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) A listing of the new systems that are expected to be 

needed to complete the defense business enterprise architecture, 

along with each system’s time-phased milestones, performance 

measures, financial resource needs, and risks or challenges to 

integration into the business enterprise architecture. 

‘‘(2) A listing of the defense business systems existing as of 

September 30, 2011 (known as ‘legacy systems’) that will not be 

part of the defense business enterprise architecture, together 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
234 

with the schedule for terminating those legacy systems that provides for reducing the use of those legacy systems in phases. 

‘‘(3) A listing of the legacy systems (referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3), together with a strategy for making the modifications to those systems that will be needed to ensure that such systems comply 

with the defense business enterprise architecture, including 

time-phased milestones, performance measures, and financial 

resource needs. 

‘‘(f) DESIGNATION OF APPROPRIATE PRE-CERTIFICATION AU- THORITIES AND SENIOR OFFICIALS.—(1) For purposes of subsections 

(a) and (g), the appropriate pre-certification authority for a defense 

business system program is as follows: 

‘‘(A) In the case of an Army program, the Chief Management Officer of the Army. 

‘‘(B) In the case of a Navy program, the Chief Management 

Officer of the Navy. 

‘‘(C) In the case of an Air Force program, the Chief Management Officer of the Air Force. 

‘‘(D) In the case of a program of a Defense Agency, the Director, or equivalent, of such Defense Agency, unless otherwise 

approved by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(E) In the case of a program that will support the business 

processes of more than one military department or Defense 

Agency, an appropriate pre-certification authority designated by 

the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(2) For purposes of subsection (g), the appropriate senior official of the Department of Defense for the functions and activities 

supported by a covered defense business system is as follows: 

‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in the case of any defense business system 

the primary purpose of which is to support acquisition, logistics, installations, environment, or safety and occupational 

health activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in the 

case of any defense business system the primary purpose of 

which is to support financial management activities or strategic 

planning and budgeting activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness, in the case of any defense business system the primary purpose of which is to support human resource management activities of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(D) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, in the case of any defense business system the primary 

purpose of which is to support information technology infrastructure or information assurance activities of the Department 

of Defense. 

‘‘(E) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, in the case of any defense business system the 

primary purpose of which is to support any activity of the Department of Defense not covered by subparagraphs (A) through 

(D). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
235 

‘‘(g) DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM INVESTMENT REVIEW.—(1) The 

Secretary of Defense shall require the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, not later than March 15, 2012, 

to establish an investment review board and investment management process, consistent with section 11312 of title 40, to review and 

certify the planning, design, acquisition, development, deployment, 

operation, maintenance, modernization, and project cost benefits 

and risks of covered defense business systems programs. The investment review board and investment management process so established shall specifically address the requirements of subsection (a). 

‘‘(2) The review of defense business systems programs under the 

investment management process shall include the following: 

‘‘(A) Review and approval by an investment review board of 

each covered defense business system program before the obligation of funds on the system in accordance with the requirements 

of subsection (a). 

‘‘(B) Periodic review, but not less than annually, of all covered defense business system programs, grouped in portfolios of 

defense business systems. 

‘‘(C) Representation on each investment review board by appropriate officials from among the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the armed forces, the combatant commands, the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff, and the Defense Agencies, including representation from each of the following: 

‘‘(i) The appropriate pre-certification authority for the 

defense business system under review. 

‘‘(ii) The appropriate senior official of the Department 

of Defense for the functions and activities supported by the 

defense business system under review. 

‘‘(iii) The Chief Information Officer of the Department 

of Defense. 

‘‘(D) Use of threshold criteria to ensure an appropriate level 

of review within the Department of Defense of, and accountability for, defense business system programs depending on 

scope, complexity, and cost. 

‘‘(E) Use of procedures for making certifications in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a). 

‘‘(F) Use of procedures for ensuring consistency with the 

guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense and the Defense 

Business Systems Management Committee, as required by section 186(c) of this title, and incorporation of common decision 

criteria, including standards, requirements, and priorities that 

result in the integration of defense business systems. 

‘‘(h) BUDGET INFORMATION.—In the materials that the Secretary 

submits to Congress in support of the budget submitted to Congress 

under section 1105 of title 31 for fiscal year 2006 and fiscal years 

thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following information: 

‘‘(1) Identification of each defense business system program 

for which funding is proposed in that budget. 

‘‘(2) Identification of all funds, by appropriation, proposed 

in that budget for each such program, including— 

‘‘(A) funds for current services (to operate and maintain 

the system covered by such program); and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
236 

‘‘(B) funds for business systems modernization, identified for each specific appropriation. 

‘‘(3) For each such program, identification of the appropriate pre-certification authority and senior official of the Department of Defense designated under subsection (f). 

‘‘(4) For each such program, a description of each approval 

made under subsection (a)(3) with regard to such program. 

‘‘(i) CONGRESSIONAL REPORTS.—Not later than March 15 of 

each year from 2012 through 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense compliance with the requirements of this section. 

Each report shall— 

‘‘(1) describe actions taken and planned for meeting the requirements of subsection (a), including— 

‘‘(A) specific milestones and actual performance against 

specified performance measures, and any revision of such 

milestones and performance measures; and 

‘‘(B) specific actions on the defense business system programs submitted for certification under such subsection; 

‘‘(2) identify the number of defense business system programs so certified; 

‘‘(3) identify any covered defense business system program 

during the preceding fiscal year that was not approved under 

subsection (a), and the reasons for the lack of approval; 

‘‘(4) discuss specific improvements in business operations 

and cost savings resulting from successful defense business systems programs; and 

‘‘(5) include a copy of the most recent report of the Chief 

Management Officer of each military department on implementation of business transformation initiatives by such department 

in accordance with section 908 of the Duncan Hunter National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 

110–417; 122 Stat. 4569; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). 

‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘defense business system’ means an information system, other than a national security system, operated by, 

for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including financial systems, mixed systems, financial data feeder systems, and 

information technology and information assurance infrastructure, used to support business activities, such as acquisition, financial management, logistics, strategic planning and budgeting, installations and environment, and human resource management. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘covered defense business system program’ 

means any defense business system program that is expected to 

have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the 

current future-years defense program submitted to Congress 

under section 221 of this title. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘enterprise architecture’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44. 

‘‘(4) The terms ‘information system’ and ‘information technology’ have the meanings given those terms in section 11101 

of title 40. 

‘‘(5) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
237 

SEC. 902. QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE POSITION OF 

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 

Section 132(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘The 

Deputy Secretary shall be appointed from among persons most highly qualified for the position by reason of background and experience, 

including persons with appropriate management experience.’’. 

SEC. 903. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR OFFICIAL WITH PRINCIPAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR AIRSHIP 

PROGRAMS. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) designate a senior official of the Department of Defense 

as the official with principal responsibility for the airship programs of the Department; and 

(2) set forth the responsibilities of that senior official with 

respect to such programs. 

SEC. 904. MEMORANDA OF AGREEMENT ON IDENTIFICATION AND 

DEDICATION OF ENABLING CAPABILITIES OF GENERAL 

PURPOSE FORCES TO FULFILL CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS 

OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES. 

(a) REQUIREMENT.—By not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, each Secretary 

of a military department shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with the Commander of the United States Special Operations 

Command that identifies or establishes processes and associated 

milestones by which numbers and types of enabling capabilities of 

the general purpose forces of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary can be identified and dedicated to fulfill the 

training and operational requirements of special operations forces 

under the United States Special Operations Command. 

(b) FORMAT.—Such agreements may be accomplished in an 

annex to existing memoranda of agreement or through separate 

memoranda of agreement. 

SEC. 905. ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACCESS TO 

NON-UNITED STATES CITIZENS WITH SCIENTIFIC AND 

TECHNICAL EXPERTISE VITAL TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

conduct an assessment of current and potential mechanisms to permit the Department of Defense to employ non-United States citizens 

with critical scientific and technical skills that are vital to the national security interests of the United States. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) An identification of the critical scientific and technical 

skills that are vital to the national security interests of the 

United States and are anticipated to be in short supply over the 

next 10 years, and an identification of the military positions 

and civilian positions of the Department of Defense that require 

such skills. 

(2) An identification of mechanisms and incentives for attracting persons who are non-United States citizens with such 

skills to such positions, including the expedited extension of 

United States citizenship. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
238 

(3) An identification and assessment of any concerns associated with the provision of security clearances to such persons. 

(4) An identification and assessment of any concerns associated with the employment of such persons in civilian positions 

in the United States defense industrial base, including in positions in which United States citizenship, a security clearance, 

or both are a condition of employment. 

(c) REPORTS.— (1) STATUS REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report describing the current 

status of the assessment required by subsection (a). 

(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the assessment. 

The report shall set forth the following: 

(A) The results of the assessment. 

(B) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in 

light of the results of the assessment. 

SEC. 906. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF MODELING AND SIMULATION IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 

It is the sense of Congress to encourage the Department of Defense to continue the use and enhancement of modeling and simulation (M&S) across the spectrum of defense activities, including acquisition, analysis, experimentation, intelligence, planning, medical, 

test and evaluation, and training. 

SEC. 907. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON TIES BETWEEN JOINT 

WARFIGHTING AND COALITION CENTER AND ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION OF NATO. 

It is the sense of Congress that the successor organization to the 

United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM), the Joint 

Warfighting and Coalition Center, should establish close ties with 

the Allied Command Transformation (ACT) command of the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). 

SEC. 908. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF PLANNED REDUCTIONS OF PERSONNEL AT THE JOINT WARFARE ANALYSIS CENTER ON 

PERSONNEL SKILLS. 

Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a description and assessment 

of the effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint Warfare 

Analysis Center (JWAC) on the personnel skills to be available at 

the Center after the reductions. The report shall be in unclassified 

form, but may contain a classified annex. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

SEC. 911. HARMFUL INTERFERENCE TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. 

(a) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CONDITIONS ON

COMMERCIAL TERRESTRIAL OPERATIONS.— (1) CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONS UNTIL INTERFERENCE ADDRESSED.—The Federal Communications Commission shall not 

lift the conditions imposed on commercial terrestrial operations 

in the Order and Authorization adopted on January 26, 2011 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
239 

(DA 11–133), or otherwise permit such operations, until the 

Commission has resolved concerns of widespread harmful interference by such commercial terrestrial operations to covered 

GPS devices. 

(2) NOTICE AND COMMENT ON WORKING GROUP REPORT.— 

Prior to permitting such commercial terrestrial operations, the 

Federal Communications Commission shall make available the 

final working group report mandated by such Order and Authorization and provide all interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on such report. 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—At the conclusion of the proceeding 

on such commercial terrestrial operations, the Federal 

Communications Commission shall submit to the congressional committees described in subparagraph (B) official 

copies of the documents containing the final decision of the 

Commission regarding whether to permit such commercial 

terrestrial operations. If the decision is to permit such commercial terrestrial operations, such documents shall contain or be accompanied by an explanation of how the concerns described in paragraph (1) have been resolved. 

(B) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DESCRIBED.—The 

congressional committees described in this paragraph are 

the following: 

(i) The Committee on Energy and Commerce and 

the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 

(ii) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation and the Committee on Armed Services 

of the Senate. 

(b) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REVIEW OF HARMFUL INTERFERENCE.— 

(1) REVIEW.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter until the 

date referred to in paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense shall 

conduct a review to— 

(A) assess the ability of covered GPS devices to receive 

signals from Global Positioning System satellites without 

widespread harmful interference; and 

(B) determine if commercial communications services 

are causing or will cause widespread harmful interference 

with covered GPS devices. 

(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 

(A) NOTICE.—If the Secretary of Defense determines 

during a review under paragraph (1) that commercial communications services are causing or will cause widespread 

harmful interference with covered GPS devices, the Secretary shall promptly submit to the congressional defense 

committees notice of such interference. 

(B) CONTENTS.—The notice required under subparagraph (A) shall include— 

(i) a list and description of the covered GPS devices that are being or expected to be interfered with by 

commercial communications services; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
240 

(ii) a description of the source of, and the entity 

causing or expect to cause, the interference with such 

receivers; 

(iii) a description of the manner in which such 

source or such entity is causing or expected to cause 

such interference; 

(iv) a description of the magnitude of harm caused 

or expected to be caused by such interference; 

(v) a description of the duration of and the conditions and circumstances under which such interference 

is occurring or expected to occur; 

(vi) a description of the impact of such interference 

on the national security interests of the United States; 

and 

(vii) a description of the plans of the Secretary to 

address, alleviate, or mitigate such interference, including the cost of such plans. 

(C) FORM.—The notice required under subparagraph 

(A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(3) TERMINATION DATE.—The date referred to in this paragraph is the earlier of— 

(A) the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

(B) the date on which the Secretary— 

(i) determines that commercial communications 

services are not causing any widespread harmful interference with covered GPS devices; and 

(ii) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees notice of the determination made 

under clause (i). 

(c) COVERED GPS DEVICE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘covered GPS device’’ means a Global Position System device of the 

Department of Defense. 

SEC. 912. AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE INCREMENTS OR BLOCKS OF 

SATELLITES AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAMS SUBJECT TO ACQUISITION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 2430a(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘If the Secretary of Defense determines’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) If the Secretary of Defense determines that a major defense 

acquisition program to purchase satellites requires the delivery of 

satellites in two or more increments or blocks, the Secretary may 

designate each such increment or block as a major subprogram for 

the purposes of acquisition reporting under this chapter.’’. 

Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 

SEC. 921. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY 

THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL ON INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION SHARING. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General a reVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00270 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
241 

port on actions taken by the Secretary in response to the recommendations of the Comptroller General in the report issued on 

January 22, 2010, titled ‘‘Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: Establishing Guidance, Timelines, and Accountability for Integrating Intelligence Data Would Improve Information Sharing’’ 

(GAO–10–265NI), regarding the need to develop guidance, such as 

a concept of operations, to provide overarching direction and priorities for sharing intelligence information across the defense elements 

of the intelligence community. 

(b) REVIEW OF REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit 

to the appropriate congressional committees a review of the report 

submitted under subsection (a), including a determination by the 

Comptroller General as to whether the actions taken by the Secretary of Defense in response to the recommendations referred to in 

such subsection are consistent with and adequately address such 

recommendations. 

(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; 

(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House of Representatives; and 

(3) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 922. INSIDER THREAT DETECTION. 

(a) PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a program for information sharing protection and insider 

threat mitigation for the information systems of the Department of 

Defense to detect unauthorized access to, use of, or transmission of 

classified or controlled unclassified information. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The program established under subsection (a) 

shall include the following: 

(1) Technology solutions for deployment within the Department of Defense that allow for centralized monitoring and detection of unauthorized activities, including— 

(A) monitoring the use of external ports and read and 

write capability controls; 

(B) disabling the removable media ports of computers 

physically or electronically; 

(C) electronic auditing and reporting of unusual and 

unauthorized user activities; 

(D) using data-loss prevention and data-rights management technology to prevent the unauthorized export of 

information from a network or to render such information 

unusable in the event of the unauthorized export of such information; 

(E) a roles-based access certification system; 

(F) cross-domain guards for transfers of information 

between different networks; and 

(G) patch management for software and security updates. 

(2) Policies and procedures to support such program, including special consideration for policies and procedures related 

to international and interagency partners and activities in support of ongoing operations in areas of hostilities. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
242 

(3) A governance structure and process that integrates information security and sharing technologies with the policies 

and procedures referred to in paragraph (2). Such structure 

and process shall include— 

(A) coordination with the existing security clearance 

and suitability review process; 

(B) coordination of existing anomaly detection techniques, including those used in counterintelligence investigation or personnel screening activities; and 

(C) updating and expediting of the classification review 

and marking process. 

(4) A continuing analysis of— 

(A) gaps in security measures under the program; and 

(B) technology, policies, and processes needed to increase the capability of the program beyond the initially established full operating capability to address such gaps. 

(5) A baseline analysis framework that includes measures 

of performance and effectiveness. 

(6) A plan for how to ensure related security measures are 

put in place for other departments or agencies with access to 

Department of Defense networks. 

(7) A plan for enforcement to ensure that the program is 

being applied and implemented on a uniform and consistent 

basis. 

(c) OPERATING CAPABILITY.—The Secretary shall ensure the program established under subsection (a)— 

(1) achieves initial operating capability not later than October 1, 2012; and 

(2) achieves full operating capability not later than October 

1, 2013. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— 

(1) the implementation plan for the program established 

under subsection (a); 

(2) the resources required to implement the program; 

(3) specific efforts to ensure that implementation does not 

negatively impact activities in support of ongoing operations in 

areas of hostilities; 

(4) a definition of the capabilities that will be achieved at 

initial operating capability and full operating capability, respectively; and 

(5) a description of any other issues related to such implementation that the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(e) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall provide briefings to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate as follows: 

(1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, a briefing describing the governance structure referred to in subsection (b)(3). 

(2) Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, a briefing detailing the inventory and status of technology solutions deployment referred to in subsection (b)(1), including an identification of the total number of host platforms 

planned for such deployment, the current number of host platVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00272 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
243 

forms that provide appropriate security, and the funding and 

timeline for remaining deployment. 

(3) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, a briefing detailing the policies and procedures referred to in subsection (b)(2), including an assessment of the effectiveness of such policies and procedures and an assessment 

of the potential impact of such policies and procedures on information sharing within the Department of Defense and with 

interagency and international partners. 

(f) BUDGET SUBMISSION.—On the date on which the President 

submits to Congress the budget under section 1105 of title 31, 

United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2019, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an identification of the resources requested in such budget 

to carry out the program established under subsection (a). 

SEC. 923. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR EXCHANGES OF MAPPING, 

CHARTING, AND GEODETIC DATA TO INCLUDE NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS. 

(a) BROADENING OF AUTHORITY.—Section 454 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND INTER- NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.—’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’; 

and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND ACADEMIC INSTI- TUTIONS.—The Secretary may authorize the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to exchange or furnish mapping, charting, and 

geodetic data, supplies, and services relating to areas outside of the 

United States to a nongovernmental organization or an academic 

institution engaged in geospatial information research or production 

of such areas pursuant to an agreement for the production or exchange of such data.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 454. Exchange of mapping, charting, and geodetic data 

with foreign countries, international organizations, 

nongovernmental organizations, and academic institutions’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 22 of such title is amended by 

striking the item relating to section 454 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘454. Exchange of mapping, charting, and geodetic data with foreign countries, international organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and academic 

institutions.’’. 

SEC. 924. OZONE WIDGET FRAMEWORK. 

(a) MECHANISM FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION

FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYSIS TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS.—The 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, acting 

through the Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency, 

shall implement a mechanism to publish and maintain on the public Internet the application programming interface specifications, a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
244 

developer’s toolkit, source code, and such other information on, and 

resources for, the Ozone Widget Framework (OWF) as the Chief Information Officer considers necessary to permit individuals and 

companies to develop, integrate, and test analysis tools and applications for use by the Department of Defense and the elements of the 

intelligence community. 

(b) PROCESS FOR VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION OF IMPROVEMENTS

BY PRIVATE SECTOR.—In addition to the requirement under subsection (a), the Chief Information Officer shall also establish a process by which private individuals and companies may voluntarily 

contribute the following: 

(1) Improvements to the source code and documentation for 

the Ozone Widget Framework. 

(2) Alternative or compatible implementations of the published application programming interface specifications for the 

Framework. 

(c) ENCOURAGEMENT OF USE AND DEVELOPMENT.—The Chief 

Information Officer shall, whenever practicable, encourage and foster the use, support, development, and enhancement of the Ozone 

Widget Framework by the computer industry and commercial information technology vendors, including the development of tools that 

are compatible with the Framework. 

SEC. 925. PLAN FOR INCORPORATION OF ENTERPRISE QUERY AND 

CORRELATION CAPABILITY INTO THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION ENTERPRISE. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall develop a plan for the incorporation of an enterprise query and correlation capability into the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise (DI2E). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) 

shall— 

(A) include an assessment of all the current and 

planned advanced query and correlation systems which operate on large centralized databases that are deployed or to 

be deployed in elements of the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise; and 

(B) determine where duplication can be eliminated, 

how use of these systems can be expanded, whether these 

systems can be operated collaboratively, and whether they 

can and should be integrated with the enterprise-wide 

query and correlation capability required pursuant to paragraph (1). 

(b) PILOT PROGRAM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary shall conduct a 

pilot program to demonstrate an enterprisewide query and correlation capability through the Defense Intelligence Information 

Enterprise program. 

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the pilot program shall be to 

demonstrate the capability of an enterprisewide query and correlation system to achieve the following: 

(A) To conduct complex, simultaneous queries by a 

large number of users and analysts across numerous, large 

distributed data stores with response times measured in 

seconds. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
245 

(B) To be scaled up to operate effectively on all the data 

holdings of the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise. 

(C) To operate across multiple levels of security with 

data guards. 

(D) To operate effectively on both unstructured data 

and structured data. 

(E) To extract entities, resolve them, and (as appropriate) mask them to protect sources and methods, privacy, 

or both. 

(F) To control access to data by means of on-line electronic user credentials, profiles, and authentication. 

(3) TERMINATION.—The pilot program conducted under this 

subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2014. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than November 1, 2012, the Under Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the actions undertaken by the Under Secretary to carry out 

this section. The report shall set forth the plan developed under subsection (a) and a description and assessment of the pilot program 

conducted under subsection (b). 

(d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 926. FACILITIES FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION OR SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES ABROAD. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2682 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The maintenance and repair’’ and inserting 

‘‘(a) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.—Subject to subsection (c), the 

maintenance and repair’’; 

(2) by designating the second sentence as subsection (b), realigning such subsection so as to be indented two ems from the 

left margin, and inserting ‘‘JURISDICTION.—’’ before ‘‘A real 

property facility’’; 

(3) in subsection (b), as designated by paragraph (2) of this 

subsection, by striking ‘‘A real property’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject 

to subsection (c), a real property’’; and 

(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) FACILITIES FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION OR FOR SPECIAL

OPERATIONS ABROAD.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) if necessary to provide security 

for authorized intelligence collection or special operations activities 

abroad undertaken by the Department of Defense.’’. 

(b) SUNSET.—Effective on September 30, 2015, or the date of the 

enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for 

fiscal year 2016, whichever is later— 

(1) subsection (a) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 

Code, as designated and amended by subsection (a)(1) of this 

section, is amended by striking ‘‘Subject to subsection (c), the 

maintenance and repair’’ and inserting ‘‘The maintenance and 

repair’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
246 

(2) subsection (b) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 

Code, as designated by subsection (a)(2) and amended by subsection (a)(3) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘Subject to 

subsection (c), a real property’’ and inserting ‘‘A real property’’; 

and 

(3) subsection (c) of section 2682 of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a)(4) of this section, is repealed. 

Subtitle D—Total Force Management 

SEC. 931. GENERAL POLICY FOR TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT. 

(a) REVISION OF GENERAL PERSONNEL POLICY SECTION.—Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 129a. General policy for total force management 

‘‘(a) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall establish policies and procedures for determining the most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor 

personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(b) RISK MITIGATION OVER COST.— In establishing the policies 

and procedures under subsection (a), the Secretary shall clearly provide that attainment of a Department of Defense workforce sufficiently sized and comprised of the appropriate mix of personnel necessary to carry out the mission of the Department and the core mission areas of the armed forces (as identified pursuant to section 

118b of this title) takes precedence over cost. 

‘‘(c) DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Secretary shall 

delegate responsibility for implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a) as follows: 

‘‘(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness shall have overall responsibility for guidance to implement such policies and procedures. 

‘‘(2) The Secretaries of the military departments and the 

heads of the Defense Agencies shall have overall responsibility 

for the requirements determination, planning, programming, 

and budgeting for such policies and procedures. 

‘‘(3) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall be responsible for ensuring that the 

defense acquisition system, as defined in section 2545 of this 

title, is consistent with such policies and procedures and with 

implementation pursuant to paragraph (1). 

‘‘(4) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall be 

responsible for ensuring that the budget for the Department of 

Defense is consistent with such policies and procedures. The 

Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of any deviations from such policies and procedures that 

are recommended in the budget. 

‘‘(d) USE OF PLAN, INVENTORY, AND LIST.—The policies and 

procedures established by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall 

specifically require the Department of Defense to use the following 

when making determinations regarding the appropriate workforce 

mix necessary to perform its mission: 

‘‘(1) The civilian strategic workforce plan (required by section 115b of this title). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
247 

‘‘(2) The civilian positions master plan (required by section 

1597(c) of this title). 

‘‘(3) The inventory of contracts for services required by section 2330a(c) of this title. 

‘‘(4) The list of activities required by the Federal Activities 

Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–270; 31 U.S.C. 

501 note). 

‘‘(e) CONSIDERATIONS IN CONVERTING PERFORMANCE OF FUNCTIONS.— If conversion of functions to performance by either Department of Defense civilian personnel or contractor personnel is considered, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness 

shall ensure compliance with— 

‘‘(1) section 2463 of this title (relating to guidelines and 

procedures for use of civilian employees to perform Department 

of Defense functions); and 

‘‘(2) section 2461 of this title (relating to public-private competition required before conversion to contractor performance). 

‘‘(f) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS.—Nothing in 

this title may be construed as authorizing— 

‘‘(1) a military department or Defense Agency to directly 

convert a function to contractor performance without complying 

with section 2461 of this title; 

‘‘(2) the use of contractor personnel for functions that are 

inherently governmental even if there is a military or civilian 

personnel shortfall in the Department of Defense; 

‘‘(3) restrictions on the use by a military department or Defense Agency of contractor personnel to perform functions closely 

associated with inherently governmental functions, provided 

that— 

‘‘(A) there are adequate resources to maintain sufficient 

capabilities within the Department in the functional area 

being considered for performance by contractor personnel; 

and 

‘‘(B) there is adequate Government oversight of contractor personnel performing such functions; 

‘‘(4) the establishment of numerical goals or budgetary savings targets for the conversion of functions to performance by either Department of Defense civilian personnel or for conversion 

to performance by contractor personnel; or 

‘‘(5) the imposition of a civilian hiring freeze that may inhibit the implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to section 129a 

in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘129a. General policy for total force management.’’. 

SEC. 932. REVISIONS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CONSTRAINTS. 

Section 129 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by inserting after ‘‘(1)’’ the following: ‘‘the total force 

management policies and procedures established under section 129a of this title, (2)’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
248 

(B) by striking ‘‘department and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘department, and (3)’’; 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘within that budget activity for which funds are provided for that fiscal year.’’ and inserting ‘‘within that budget activity as determined under the 

total force management policies and procedures established 

under section 129a of this title.’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e), by striking the sentence beginning with 

‘‘With respect to’’. 

SEC. 933. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE 

MANAGEMENT. 

(a) AMENDMENTS TO SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT.—Section 

113(l) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(l)(1) The Secretary shall include in the annual report to Congress under subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(A) A comparison of the amounts provided in the defense 

budget for support and for mission activities for each of the preceding five fiscal years. 

‘‘(B) A comparison of the following for each of the preceding 

five fiscal years: 

‘‘(i) The number of military personnel, shown by major 

occupational category, assigned to support positions or to 

mission positions. 

‘‘(ii) The number of civilian personnel, shown by major 

occupational category, assigned to support positions or to 

mission positions. 

‘‘(iii) The number of contractor personnel performing 

support functions. 

‘‘(C) An accounting for each of the preceding five fiscal 

years of the following: 

‘‘(i) The number of military and civilian personnel, 

shown by armed force and by major occupational category, 

assigned to support positions. 

‘‘(ii) The number of contractor personnel performing 

support functions. 

‘‘(D) An identification, for each of the three workforce sectors (military, civilian, and contractor) of the percentage of the 

total number of personnel in that workforce sector that is providing support to headquarters and headquarters support activities for each of the preceding five fiscal years. 

‘‘(2) Contractor personnel shall be determined for purposes of 

paragraph (1) by using contractor full-time equivalents, based on 

the inventory required under section 2330a of this title.’’. 

(b) AMENDMENTS RELATING TO CERTAIN GUIDELINES.—Section 

1597(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

after the first sentence the following: ‘‘In establishing the guidelines, 

the Secretary shall ensure that nothing in the guidelines conflicts 

with the requirements of section 129 of this title or the policies and 

procedures established under section 129a of this title.’’. 

(c) AMENDMENT TO REQUIREMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF SERVICES.—Section 863 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4293; 

10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by adding at the end of subsection 

(d) the following new paragraph: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
249 

‘‘(9) Considerations relating to total force management policies and procedures established under section 129a of this 

title.’’. 

SEC. 934. MODIFICATIONS OF ANNUAL DEFENSE MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS REPORT. 

Section 115a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (1); and 

(2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following 

new paragraphs (2) and (3): 

‘‘(2) the annual civilian personnel requirements level for 

each component of the Department of Defense for the next fiscal 

year and the civilian end-strength level for the prior fiscal year; 

and 

‘‘(3) the projected number of contractor personnel full-time 

equivalents required to provide contract services (as that term 

is defined in section 235 of this title) for each component of the 

Department of Defense for the next fiscal year and the contractor personnel full-time equivalents that provided contract 

services for each component of the Department of Defense for the 

prior fiscal year as reported in the inventory of contracts for 

services required by section 2330a(c) of this title.’’. 

SEC. 935. REVISIONS TO STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN. 

(a) REVISION IN REPORTING PERIOD.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 115b of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Annual strategic’’ and inserting ‘‘Biennial strategic’’; 

(B) in the heading of subsection (a), by striking ‘‘ANNUAL’’ and inserting ‘‘BIENNIAL’’; and 

(C) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘on an annual 

basis’’ and inserting ‘‘in every even-numbered year’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 2 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to 

section 115b and inserting the following: 

‘‘115b. Biennial strategic workforce plan.’’. 

(b) REVISION IN ASSESSMENT CONTENTS AND PERIOD.—Section 

115b(b)(1) of such title is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘seven-year period following the year in which the plan is submitted’’ and inserting 

‘‘five-year period corresponding to the current future-years defense program under section 221 of this title’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting before the semicolon 

at the end the following: ‘‘, as determined under the total force 

management policies and procedures established under section 

129a of this title’’. 

(c) REFERENCE TO SECTION 129a.—Section 115b(c)(2)(D) of such 

title is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘and the policies and procedures established under section 

129a of this title’’. 

SEC. 936. AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES. 

(a) AMENDMENTS RELATING TO INVENTORY.—Section 

2330a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
250 

(1) by inserting after ‘‘pursuant to contracts for services’’ the 

following: ‘‘(and pursuant to contracts for goods to the extent 

services are a significant component of performance as identified in a separate line item of a contract)’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (A)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (i); and 

(B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(ii) the calculation of contractor full-time equivalents 

for direct labor, using direct labor hours in a manner that 

is comparable to the calculation of Department of Defense 

civilian full-time employees; and 

‘‘(iii) the conduct and completion of the annual review 

required under subsection (e)(1).’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘for requirements relating to acquisition’’ before the period. 

(b) AMENDMENTS RELATING TO REVIEW AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 2330a(e) of such title is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2); 

(2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting a period; and 

(3) by striking paragraph (4). 

(c) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT AND APPROVAL

MECHANISMS.—Section 2330a of such title is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 

(g) and (h), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN AND ENFORCEMENT AND APPROVAL

MECHANISMS.—The Secretary of the military department or head of 

the Defense Agency responsible for activities in the inventory shall 

develop a plan, including an enforcement mechanism and approval 

process, to— 

‘‘(1) provide for the use of the inventory by the military department or Defense Agency to implement the requirements of 

section 129a of this title; 

‘‘(2) ensure the inventory is used to inform strategic workforce planning; 

‘‘(3) facilitate use of the inventory for compliance with section 235 of this title; and 

‘‘(4) provide for appropriate consideration of the conversion 

of activities identified under subsection (e)(3) within a reasonable period of time.’’. 

SEC. 937. PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND DURATION OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE COMPETITIONS. 

Section 2461(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (E)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘, begins’’ and inserting ‘‘shall be conducted in accordance with guidance and procedures that 

shall be issued and maintained by the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness and shall begin’’; 

(B) by inserting after ‘‘the date on which’’ the following: 

‘‘a component of’’; 

(C) by inserting ‘‘first’’ before ‘‘obligates’’; 

(D) by inserting ‘‘specifically’’ after ‘‘funds’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
251 

(E) by inserting ‘‘for the preliminary planning effort’’ 

after ‘‘support’’; and 

(F) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘a public-private’’ before 

‘‘competition’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (F)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or Defense Agency’’ after ‘‘military department’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘of such date’’ and inserting ‘‘of the actions intended to be taken during the preliminary planning 

process’’; 

(C) by inserting ‘‘of such actions’’ after ‘‘public notice’’; 

(D) by inserting after ‘‘website’’ the following: ‘‘and 

through other means as determined necessary’’; and 

(E) by striking ‘‘Such date is the first day of preliminary planning for a public-private competition for’’ and inserting ‘‘The date of such announcement shall be used for’’. 

SEC. 938. CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS FROM CONTRACTOR 

PERFORMANCE TO PERFORMANCE BY DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 

Section 2463 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(1)— 

(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) 

as subparagraphs (C), (E), and (F), respectively; 

(B) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraphs (A) and (B): 

‘‘(A) is a critical function that— 

‘‘(i) is necessary to maintain sufficient Government 

expertise and technical capabilities; or 

‘‘(ii) entails operational risk associated with contractor performance; 

‘‘(B) is an acquisition workforce function;’’; and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (C), as redesignated by subparagraph (A), the following new subparagraph (D): 

‘‘(D) has been performed by Department of Defense civilian employees at any time during the previous 10-year 

period;’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (g); 

(3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsections (e) and (f): 

‘‘(e) DETERMINATIONS RELATING TO THE CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in determining whether a function should be converted to performance by 

Department of Defense civilian employees, the Secretary of Defense 

shall— 

‘‘(A) develop methodology for determining costs based on 

the guidance outlined in the Directive-Type Memorandum 09– 

007 entitled ‘Estimating and Comparing the Full Costs of Civilian and Military Manpower and Contractor Support’ or any 

successor guidance for the determination of costs when costs are 

the sole basis for the determination; 

‘‘(B) take into consideration any supplemental guidance 

issued by the Secretary of a military department for determinations affecting functions of that military department; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
252 

‘‘(C) ensure that the difference in the cost of performing the 

function by a contractor compared to the cost of performing the 

function by Department of Defense civilian employees would be 

equal to or exceed the lesser of— 

‘‘(i) 10 percent of the personnel-related costs for performance of that function; or 

‘‘(ii) $10,000,000. 

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any function that is inherently governmental or any function described in subparagraph (A), 

(B), or (C) of subsection (b)(1). 

‘‘(f) NOTIFICATION RELATING TO THE CONVERSION OF CERTAIN

FUNCTIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures 

for the timely notification of any contractor who performs a function 

that the Secretary plans to convert to performance by Department 

of Defense civilian employees pursuant to subsection (a). The Secretary shall provide a copy of any such notification to the congressional defense committees.’’; and 

(4) in subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘this section’’ and all that follows and 

inserting ‘‘this section:’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘functions closely associated with inherently 

governmental functions’ has the meaning given that term in section 2383(b)(3) of this title. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘acquisition function’ has the meaning given 

that term under section 1721(a) of this title. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘inherently governmental function’ has the 

meaning given that term in the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–270; 31 U.S.C. 501 note).’’. 

Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related 

Matters 

SEC. 941. CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ASSESSMENT OF 

CONTINGENCY PLANS. 

Section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘assessment of’’ and all 

that follows through the period and inserting: ‘‘assessment of— 

‘‘(A) the nature and magnitude of the strategic and 

military risks associated with executing the missions called 

for under the current National Military Strategy; and 

‘‘(B) the critical deficiencies and strengths in force capabilities (including manpower, logistics, intelligence, and 

mobility support) identified during the preparation and review of contingency plans of each geographic combatant 

commander, and the effect of such deficiencies and 

strengths on strategic plans and on meeting national security objectives and policy.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by inserting after ‘‘National Military Strategy is 

significant,’’ the following, ‘‘or that critical deficiencies in 

force capabilities exist for a contingency plan,’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘or deficiency’’ before the period at the 

end. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
253 

SEC. 942. QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW. 

Paragraph (4) of section 118(b) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(4) to make recommendations that are not constrained to 

comply with and are fully independent of the budget submitted 

to Congress by the President pursuant to section 1105 of title 

31.’’. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 951. ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE MULTILATERAL, BILATERAL, AND 

REGIONAL COOPERATION REGARDING CYBERSECURITY. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF CYBERSECURITY PROGRAM.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1051b the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1051c. Multilateral, bilateral, or regional cooperation programs: assignments to improve education and 

training in information security 

‘‘(a) ASSIGNMENTS AUTHORIZED; PURPOSE.—The Secretary of 

Defense may authorize the temporary assignment of a member of the 

military forces of a foreign country to a Department of Defense organization for the purpose of assisting the member to obtain education 

and training to improve the member’s ability to understand and respond to information security threats, vulnerabilities of information 

security systems, and the consequences of information security incidents. 

‘‘(b) PAYMENT OF CERTAIN EXPENSES.—To facilitate the assignment of a member of a foreign military force to a Department of Defense organization under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 

may pay such expenses in connection with the assignment as the 

Secretary considers in the national security interests of the United 

States. 

‘‘(c) PROTECTION OF DEPARTMENT CYBERSECURITY.—In authorizing the temporary assignment of members of foreign military 

forces to Department of Defense organizations under subsection (a), 

the Secretary of Defense shall require the inclusion of adequate safeguards to prevent any compromising of Department information security. 

‘‘(d) MULTI-YEAR AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds available to 

carry out this section shall be available, to the extent provided in 

appropriations Acts, for programs and activities under this section 

that begin in a fiscal year and end in the following fiscal year. 

‘‘(e) INFORMATION SECURITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘information security’ refers to— 

‘‘(1) the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or the information such system processes, stores, 

or transmits; and 

‘‘(2) the security policies, security procedures, or acceptable 

use policies with respect to an information system.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 1051b the following new item: 

‘‘1051c. Multilateral, bilateral, or regional cooperation programs: assignments to improve education and training in information security.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
254 

(b) REPORT ON EXPANSION OF FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES.— 

Not later one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report evaluating 

the feasibility and benefits of expanding the fellowship program authorized by section 1051c of title 10, United States Code, as added 

by subsection (a), to include ministry of defense officials, security officials, or other civilian officials of foreign countries. 

SEC. 952. REPORT ON UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND STRUCTURE. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

study of the United States Special Operations Command sub-unified structure. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under this section shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) Recommendations to revise as necessary the present 

command structure to better support development and deployment of joint special operations forces and capabilities. 

(2) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 953. STRATEGY TO ACQUIRE CAPABILITIES TO DETECT PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN CYBER ATTACKS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop and 

implement a plan to augment the cybersecurity strategy of the Department of Defense through the acquisition of advanced capabilities to discover and isolate penetrations and attacks that were previously unknown and for which signatures have not been developed 

for incorporation into computer intrusion detection and prevention 

systems and anti-virus software systems. 

(b) CAPABILITIES.— 

(1) NATURE OF CAPABILITIES.—The capabilities to be acquired under the plan required by subsection (a) shall— 

(A) be adequate to enable well-trained analysts to discover the sophisticated attacks conducted by nation-state 

adversaries that are categorized as ‘‘advanced persistent 

threats’’; 

(B) be appropriate for— 

(i) endpoints or hosts; 

(ii) network-level gateways operated by the Defense 

Information Systems Agency where the Department of 

Defense network connects to the public Internet; and 

(iii) global networks owned and operated by private sector Tier 1 Internet Service Providers; 

(C) at the endpoints or hosts, add new discovery capabilities to the Host-Based Security System of the Department, including capabilities such as— 

(i) automatic blocking of unauthorized software 

programs and accepting approved and vetted programs; 

(ii) constant monitoring of all key computer attributes, settings, and operations (such as registry keys, 

operations running in memory, security settings, memory tables, event logs, and files); and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
255 

(iii) automatic baselining and remediation of altered computer settings and files; 

(D) at the network-level gateways and internal network 

peering points, include the sustainment and enhancement 

of a system that is based on full-packet capture, session reconstruction, extended storage, and advanced analytic 

tools, by— 

(i) increasing the number and skill level of the analysts assigned to query stored data, whether by contracting for security services, hiring and training Government personnel, or both; and 

(ii) increasing the capacity of the system to handle 

the rates for data flow through the gateways and the 

storage requirements specified by the United States 

Cyber Command; and 

(E) include the behavior-based threat detection capabilities of Tier 1 Internet Service Providers and other companies that operate on the global Internet. 

(2) SOURCE OF CAPABILITIES.—The capabilities to be acquired shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be acquired 

from commercial sources. In making decisions on the procurement of such capabilities from among competing commercial 

and Government providers, the Secretary shall take into consideration the needs of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, State and local governments, and critical infrastructure owned and operated by the private sector for unclassified, affordable, and sustainable commercial solutions. 

(c) INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF DISCOVERY CAPABILI- TIES.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include mechanisms for improving the standardization, organization, and management of the security information and event management systems 

that are widely deployed across the Department of Defense to improve the ability of United States Cyber Command to understand 

and control the status and condition of Department networks, including mechanisms to ensure that the security information and 

event management systems of the Department receive and correlate 

data collected and analyses conducted at the host or endpoint, at 

the network gateways, and by Internet Service Providers in order to 

discover new attacks reliably and rapidly. 

(d) PROVISION FOR CAPABILITY DEMONSTRATIONS.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall provide for the conduct of demonstrations, pilot projects, and other tests on cyber test ranges and operational networks in order to determine and verify that the capabilities to be acquired pursuant to the plan are effective, practical, and 

affordable. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2012, the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plan 

required by subsection (a). The report shall set forth the plan and 

include a comprehensive description of the actions being undertaken 

by the Department to implement the plan. 

SEC. 954. MILITARY ACTIVITIES IN CYBERSPACE. 

Congress affirms that the Department of Defense has the capability, and upon direction by the President may conduct offensive 

operations in cyberspace to defend our Nation, Allies and interests, 

subject to— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
256 

(1) the policy principles and legal regimes that the Department follows for kinetic capabilities, including the law of armed 

conflict; and 

(2) the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.). 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Additional requirements relating to the development of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan. 

Sec. 1003A. Display of procurement of equipment for the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces under estimated expenditures for procurement in futureyears defense programs. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1004. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1005. Three-year extension and modification of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities of other 

governmental agencies. 

Sec. 1006. Two-year extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Sec. 1007. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1008. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug 

activities. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1011. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels. 

Sec. 1012. Sense of Congress on naming of Naval vessel after United States Marine 

Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. 

Sec. 1013. Limitation on availability of funds for placing Maritime Prepositioning 

Ship squadrons on reduced operating status. 

Sec. 1014. Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels of the 

Navy. 

Sec. 1015. Transfer of certain high-speed ferries to the Navy. 

Sec. 1016. Modification of conditions on status of retired aircraft carrier ex-John F. 

Kennedy. 

Sec. 1017. Assessment of stationing of additional DDG–51 class destroyers at Naval 

Station Mayport, Florida. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1021. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force. 

Sec. 1022. Military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists. 

Sec. 1023. Procedures for periodic detention review of individuals detained at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1024. Procedures for status determinations. 

Sec. 1025. Requirement for national security protocols governing detainee communications. 

Sec. 1026. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1027. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1028. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities. 

Sec. 1029. Requirement for consultation regarding prosecution of terrorists. 

Sec. 1030. Clarification of right to plead guilty in trial of capital offense by military 

commission. 

Sec. 1031. Counterterrorism operational briefing requirement. 

Sec. 1032. National security planning guidance to deny safe havens to al-Qaeda and 

its violent extremist affiliates. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
257 

Sec. 1033. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism. 

Sec. 1034. Amendments relating to the Military Commissions Act of 2009. 

Subtitle E—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1041. Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear 

weapons and the nuclear command and control system. 

Sec. 1042. Plan on implementation of the New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1043. Annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear 

weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1044. Sense of Congress on nuclear force reductions. 

Sec. 1045. Nuclear force reductions. 

Sec. 1046. Nuclear employment strategy of the United States. 

Sec. 1047. Comptroller General report on nuclear weapon capabilities and force 

structure requirements. 

Sec. 1048. Report on feasibility of joint replacement fuze program. 

Subtitle F—Financial Management 

Sec. 1051. Modification of authorities on certification and credential standards for 

financial management positions in the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1052. Reliability of Department of Defense financial statements. 

Sec. 1053. Inclusion of plan on the financial management workforce in the strategic 

workforce plan of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1054. Tracking implementation of Department of Defense efficiencies. 

Subtitle G—Repeal and Modification of Reporting Requirements 

Sec. 1061. Repeal of reporting requirements under title 10, United States Code. 

Sec. 1062. Repeal of reporting requirements under annual defense authorization 

acts. 

Sec. 1063. Repeal of reporting requirements under other laws. 

Sec. 1064. Modification of reporting requirements under title 10, United States 

Code. 

Sec. 1065. Modification of reporting requirements under other titles of the United 

States Code. 

Sec. 1066. Modification of reporting requirements under annual defense authorization acts. 

Sec. 1067. Modification of reporting requirements under other laws. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1068. Transmission of reports in electronic format. 

Sec. 1069. Modifications to annual aircraft procurement plan. 

Sec. 1070. Change of deadline for annual report to Congress on National Guard and 

reserve component equipment. 

Sec. 1071. Report on nuclear aspirations of non-state entities, nuclear weapons, and 

related programs in non-nuclear weapons states and countries not parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and certain foreign persons. 

Sec. 1072. Implementation plan for whole-of-government vision prescribed in the 

National Security Strategy. 

Sec. 1073. Reports on resolution restrictions on the commercial sale or dissemination of eletro-optical imagery collected by satellites. 

Sec. 1074. Report on integration of unmanned aerial systems into the national airspace system. 

Sec. 1075. Report on feasibility of using unmanned aerial systems to perform airborne inspection of navigational aids in foreign airspace. 

Sec. 1076. Comptroller General review of medical research and development relating 

to improved combat casualty care. 

Sec. 1077. Reports to Congress on the modification of the force structure for the strategic nuclear weapons delivery systems of the United States. 

Sec. 1078. Comptroller General of the United States reports on the major automated 

information system programs of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1079. Report on Defense Department analytic capabilities regarding foreign ballistic missile threats. 

Sec. 1080. Report on approval and implementation of Air Sea Battle Concept. 

Sec. 1080A. Report on costs of units of the reserve components and the active components of the Armed Forces. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
258 

Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1081. Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense. 

Sec. 1082. Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for data files of the military 

flight operations quality assurance systems of the military departments. 

Sec. 1083. Limitation on procurement and fielding of light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 1084. Prohibition on the use of funds for manufacturing beyond low rate initial 

production at certain prototype integration facilities. 

Sec. 1085. Use of State Partnership Program funds for certain purposes. 

Subtitle J—Other Matters 

Sec. 1086. Redesignation of psychological operations as military information support operations in title 10, United States Code, to conform to Department of Defense usage. 

Sec. 1087. Termination of requirement for appointment of civilian members of National Security Education Board by and with the advice and consent of 

the Senate. 

Sec. 1088. Sense of Congress on application of moratorium on earmarks to this Act. 

Sec. 1089. Technical amendment. 

Sec. 1090. Cybersecurity collaboration between the Department of Defense and the 

Department of Homeland Security. 

Sec. 1091. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain Department of 

Defense critical infrastructure security information. 

Sec. 1092. Expansion of scope of humanitarian demining assistance program to include stockpiled conventional munitions assistance. 

Sec. 1093. Number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarters. 

Sec. 1094. Display of annual budget requirements for organizational clothing and 

individual equipment. 

Sec. 1095. National Rocket Propulsion Strategy. 

Sec. 1096. Grants to certain regulated companies for specified energy property not 

subject to normalization rules. 

Sec. 1097. Unmanned aerial systems and national airspace. 

Sec. 1098. Modification of dates of Comptroller General of the United States review 

of executive agreement on joint medical facility demonstration project, 

North Chicago and Great Lakes, Illinois. 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 

Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 

the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 

available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal 

year 2012 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 

(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 

transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same 

purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 

total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer 

under the authority of this section may not exceed 

$4,000,000,000. 

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military 

personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). 

(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to 

transfer authorizations— 

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 

have a higher priority than the items from which authority is 

transferred; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
259 

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 

has been denied authorization by Congress. 

(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made 

from one account to another under the authority of this section shall 

be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to 

which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount 

transferred. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall promptly notify 

Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 

(e) NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.— (1) TRANSFER AUTHORIZED.—If the amount authorized to be 

appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration for fiscal year 2012 is less than the 

$7,629,716,000 requested for such activities in the President’s 

budget request for that fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense may 

transfer, from amounts made available for the Department of 

Defense for fiscal year 2012 pursuant to an authorization of appropriations under this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an 

amount up to $125,000,000 to be available only for the weapons 

activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—In the event of a transfer under 

paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify 

Congress of the transfer and shall include in such notice the 

Department of Defense account or accounts from which the 

funds are transferred. 

(3) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided 

under this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act. 

SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in 

the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate 

Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the 

conference report or amendment between the Houses. 

SEC. 1003. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT 

READINESS PLAN. 

(a) PLANNING REQUIREMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The report to be issued pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2440; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) and 

provided by not later than May 15, 2012, shall include a plan, 

including interim objectives and a schedule of milestones for 

each military department and for the defense agencies, to support the goal established by the Secretary of Defense that the 

statement of budgetary resources is validated for audit by not 

later than September 30, 2014. Consistent with the requirements of such section, the plan shall include process and control improvements and business systems modernization efforts 

necessary for the Department of Defense to consistently prepare 

timely, reliable, and complete financial management information. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
260 

(2) SEMIANNUAL UPDATES.—The reports to be issued pursuant to such section after the report described in paragraph (1) 

shall update the plan required by such paragraph and explain 

how the Department has progressed toward meeting the milestones established in the plan. 

(b) INCLUSION OF SUBORDINATE ACTIVITIES FOR INTERIM MILESTONES.—For each interim milestone established pursuant to section 881 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4306; 10 U.S.C. 

2222 note), the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments, and 

the heads of the defense agencies and defense field activities, shall 

include a detailed description of the subordinate activities necessary 

to accomplish each interim milestone, including— 

(1) a justification of the time required for each activity; 

(2) metrics identifying the progress made within each activity; and 

(3) mitigating strategies for milestone timeframe slippages. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

Congress a report relating to the Financial Improvement and 

Audit Readiness Plan of the Department of Defense submitted 

in accordance with section 1003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2440; 10 

U.S.C. 2222 note) and section 881 of the Ike Skelton National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 

111–383; 121 Stat. 4306; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). 

(2) MATTERS COVERED.—The report shall include a corrective action plan for any identified weaknesses or deficiencies in 

the execution of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan. The corrective action plan shall— 

(A) identify near- and long-term measures for resolving 

any such weaknesses or deficiencies; 

(B) assign responsibilities within the Department of 

Defense to implement such measures; 

(C) specify implementation steps for such measures; 

and 

(D) provide timeframes for implementation of such 

measures. 

SEC. 1003A. DISPLAY OF PROCUREMENT OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES UNDER ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES FOR PROCUREMENT IN FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAMS. 

Each future-years defense program submitted to Congress under 

section 221 of title 10, United States Code, shall, in setting forth estimated expenditures and item quantities for procurement for the 

Armed Forces for the fiscal years covered by such program, display 

separately under such estimated expenditures and item quantities 

the estimated expenditures for each such fiscal year for equipment 

for each reserve component of the Armed Forces that will receive 

items in any fiscal year covered by such program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
261 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

SEC. 1004. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO 

PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 

CONDUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.—The authority in 

section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2004, as amended by subsection (a), may not be exercised unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress, in writing, that 

the Department of Defense is in compliance with the provisions of 

paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of such section, as added by section 

1012(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4346). 

SEC. 1005. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTERDRUG ACTIVITIES OF 

OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. 

(a) THREE-YEAR EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1004 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 

U.S.C. 374 note) is amended by striking ‘‘During fiscal years 2002 

through 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘During fiscal years 2012 through 

2014’’. 

(b) COVERAGE OF TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Such section is further amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘tribal,’’ after ‘‘local,’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘State or local’’ 

both places it appears and insert ‘‘State, local, or tribal’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘State or local’’ 

and inserting ‘‘State, local, or tribal’’; 

(ii) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘State, or local’’ 

and inserting ‘‘State, local, or tribal’’; and 

(iii) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘State and local’’ 

and inserting ‘‘State, local, and tribal’’. 

(2) TRIBAL GOVERNMENT DEFINED.—Such section is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(i) DEFINITIONS RELATING TO TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.—In this 

section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means a federally recognized 

Indian tribe. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘tribal government’ means the governing body 

of an Indian tribe, the status of whose land is ‘Indian country’ 

as defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code, or 

held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Indian 

tribe. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘tribal law enforcement agency’ means the 

law enforcement agency of a tribal government.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
262 

SEC. 1006. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO 

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES OF CERTAIN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 

105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 

1014(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4337), is further 

amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2013’’. 

(b) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SUPPORT.—Section (e)(2) of such section, as so amended, is further amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘$75,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000,000’’; 

and 

(2) by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2013’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE SUPPORT.—Subsection (b) of such section, as most recently amended by 

section 1024(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4587), 

is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(23) Government of Benin. 

‘‘(24) Government of Cape Verde. 

‘‘(25) Government of The Gambia. 

‘‘(26) Government of Ghana. 

‘‘(27) Government of Guinea. 

‘‘(28) Government of Ivory Coast. 

‘‘(29) Government of Jamaica. 

‘‘(30) Government of Liberia. 

‘‘(31) Government of Mauritania. 

‘‘(32) Government of Nicaragua. 

‘‘(33) Government of Nigeria. 

‘‘(34) Government of Sierra Leone. 

‘‘(35) Government of Togo.’’. 

SEC. 1007. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED 

COUNTER-DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN 

COLOMBIA. 

Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 

2042), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4346), is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2012’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2012’’. 

SEC. 1008. REPORTING REQUIREMENT ON EXPENDITURES TO SUPPORT FOREIGN COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES. 

Section 1022(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public 

Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–255), as most recently amended by 

the section 1013 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4347), is 

further amended by striking ‘‘February 15, 2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘February 15, 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
263 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

SEC. 1011. BUDGETING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL VESSELS. 

(a) ANNUAL PLAN.—Section 231 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual 

plan and certification 

‘‘(a) ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall include with the defense 

budget materials for a fiscal year— 

‘‘(1) a plan for the construction of combatant and support 

vessels for the Navy developed in accordance with this section; 

and 

‘‘(2) a certification by the Secretary that both the budget for 

that fiscal year and the future-years defense program submitted 

to Congress in relation to such budget under section 221 of this 

title provide for funding of the construction of naval vessels at 

a level that is sufficient for the procurement of the vessels provided for in the plan under paragraph (1) on the schedule provided in that plan. 

‘‘(b) ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN.—(1) The annual naval vessel construction plan developed for a fiscal year for 

purposes of subsection (a)(1) should be designed so that the naval 

vessel force provided for under that plan is capable of supporting 

the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the 

most recent national security strategy report of the President under 

section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a), 

except that, if at the time such plan is submitted with the defense 

budget materials for that fiscal year, a national security strategy report required under such section 108 has not been submitted to Congress as required by paragraph (2) or paragraph (3), if applicable, 

of subsection (a) of such section, then such annual plan should be 

designed so that the naval vessel force provided for under that plan 

is capable of supporting the ship force structure recommended in the 

report of the most recent quadrennial defense review. 

‘‘(2) Each such naval vessel construction plan shall include the 

following: 

‘‘(A) A detailed program for the construction of combatant 

and support vessels for the Navy over the next 30 fiscal years. 

‘‘(B) A description of the necessary naval vessel force structure to meet the requirements of the national security strategy 

of the United States or the most recent quadrennial defense review, whichever is applicable under paragraph (1). 

‘‘(C) The estimated levels of annual funding necessary to 

carry out the program, together with a discussion of the procurement strategies on which such estimated levels of annual 

funding are based. 

‘‘(c) ASSESSMENT WHEN VESSEL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET IS INSUFFICIENT TO MEET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS.—If the budget 

for a fiscal year provides for funding of the construction of naval 

vessels at a level that is not sufficient to sustain the naval vessel 

force structure specified in the naval vessel construction plan for 

that fiscal year under subsection (a), the Secretary shall include 

with the defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
264 

that describes and discusses the risks associated with the reduced 

force structure of naval vessels that will result from funding naval 

vessel construction at such level. Such assessment shall be coordinated in advance with the commanders of the combatant commands. 

‘‘(d) CBO EVALUATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

on which the congressional defense committees receive the plan 

under subsection (a)(1), the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to such committees a report assessing the sufficiency of the estimated levels of annual funding included in such 

plan with respect to the budget submitted during the year in which 

the plan is submitted and the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of this title. 

‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal year, means 

the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by 

the President under section 1105(a) of title 31. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with respect to a 

fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the 

Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal 

year. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘quadrennial defense review’ means the review of the defense programs and policies of the United States 

that is carried out every four years under section 118 of this 

title.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and certification’’. 

SEC. 1012. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NAMING OF NAVAL VESSEL AFTER 

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS SERGEANT RAFAEL 

PERALTA. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy is encouraged to name the next available Naval vessel after United 

States Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. 

SEC. 1013. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PLACING 

MARITIME PREPOSITIONING SHIP SQUADRONS ON REDUCED OPERATING STATUS. 

No amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be 

obligated or expended to place a Maritime Prepositioning Ship 

squadron, or any component thereof, on reduced operating status 

until the later of the following: 

(1) The date on which the Commandant of the Marine 

Corps submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

setting forth an assessment of the impact on military readiness 

of the plans of the Navy for placing such Maritime 

Prepositioning Ship squadron, or component thereof, on reduced 

operating status. 

(2) The date on which the Chief of Naval Operations submits to the congressional defense committees a report that— 

(A) describes the plans of the Navy for placing such 

Maritime Prepositioning Ship squadron, or component 

thereof, on reduced operating status; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
265 

(B) sets forth comments of the Chief of Naval Operations on the assessment described in paragraph (1). 

(3) The date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to 

the congressional defense committees that the risks to readiness 

of placing such Maritime Prepositioning squadron, or component thereof, on reduced operating status are acceptable. 

SEC. 1014. REPORT ON POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF THE NAVY FOR 

NAMING THE VESSELS OF THE NAVY. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to Congress a report on the policies and practices of the Navy for 

naming vessels of the Navy. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall set 

forth the following: 

(1) A description of the current policies and practices of the 

Navy for naming vessels of the Navy. 

(2) A description of the extent to which the policies and 

practices described under paragraph (1) vary from historical 

policies and practices of the Navy for naming vessels of the 

Navy, and an explanation for such variances (if any). 

(3) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing fixed policies for the naming of one or more classes 

of vessels of the Navy, and a statement of the policies recommended to apply to each class of vessels recommended to be 

covered by such fixed policies if the establishment of such fixed 

policies is considered feasible and advisable. 

(4) Any other matters relating to the policies and practices 

of the Navy for naming vessels of the Navy that the Secretary 

of Defense considers appropriate. 

SEC. 1015. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN HIGH-SPEED FERRIES TO THE 

NAVY. 

(a) TRANSFER FROM MARAD AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

the Navy may, subject to appropriations, from funds available for 

the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012, provide to the Maritime Administration of the Department of Transportation an 

amount not to exceed $35,000,000 for the transfer by the Maritime 

Administration to the Department of the Navy of jurisdiction and 

control over the vessels as follows: 

(1) M/V HUAKAI. 

(2) M/V ALAKAI. 

(b) USE AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SEALIFT VESSELS.—Each 

vessel transferred to the Department of the Navy under subsection 

(a) shall be administered as a Department of Defense sealift vessel 

(as such term is defined in section 2218(k)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code). 

SEC. 1016. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS ON STATUS OF RETIRED 

AIRCRAFT CARRIER EX-JOHN F. KENNEDY. 

Section 1011(c)(2) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 

2374) is amended by striking ‘‘shall require’’ and all that follows 

and inserting ‘‘may, notwithstanding paragraph (1), demilitarize 

the vessel in preparation for the transfer.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
266 

SEC. 1017. ASSESSMENT OF STATIONING OF ADDITIONAL DDG–51 

CLASS DESTROYERS AT NAVAL STATION MAYPORT, FLORIDA. 

(a) NAVY ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct an analysis of the costs and benefits of stationing additional DDG–51 class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport, Florida. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The analysis required by paragraph (1) 

shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(A) Consideration of the negative effects on the ship repair industrial base at Naval Station Mayport caused by 

the retirement of FFG–7 class frigates and the procurement 

delays of the Littoral Combat Ship, including, in particular, the increase in costs (which would be passed on to 

the taxpayer) of reconstituting the ship repair industrial 

base at Naval Station Mayport following the projected 

drastic decrease in workload. 

(B) Updated consideration of life extensions of FFG–7 

class frigates in light of continued delays in deliveries of 

the Littoral Combat Ship deliveries. 

(C) Consideration of the possibility of bringing additional surface warships to Naval Station Mayport for maintenance with the consequence of spreading the ship repair 

workload appropriately amongst the various public and 

private shipyards and ensuring the long-term health of the 

shipyard in Mayport. 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES ASSESS- MENT.—Not later than 120 days after the submittal of the report required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to Congress an assessment by the Comptroller 

General of the report, including a determination whether or not the 

report complies with applicable best practices. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF 

THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY 

FORCE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the 

President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the 

Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 

U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the 

United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection 

(b)) pending disposition under the law of war. 

(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section is 

any person as follows: 

(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided 

the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or 

harbored those responsible for those attacks. 

(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported 

al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in 

hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has 

directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
267 

(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include 

the following: 

(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the 

end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of 

Military Force. 

(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code 

(as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title 

XVIII of Public Law 111–84)). 

(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent 

tribunal having lawful jurisdiction. 

(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person’s country 

of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section is intended to limit 

or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force. 

(e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to 

affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United 

States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any 

other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States. 

(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—The Secretary 

of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application 

of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ 

for purposes of subsection (b)(2). 

SEC. 1022. MILITARY CUSTODY FOR FOREIGN AL-QAEDA TERRORISTS. 

(a) CUSTODY PENDING DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (4), the 

Armed Forces of the United States shall hold a person described in paragraph (2) who is captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force (Public Law 107–40) in military custody pending disposition under the law of war. 

(2) COVERED PERSONS.—The requirement in paragraph (1) 

shall apply to any person whose detention is authorized under 

section 1021 who is determined— 

(A) to be a member of, or part of, al-Qaeda or an associated force that acts in coordination with or pursuant to 

the direction of al-Qaeda; and 

(B) to have participated in the course of planning or 

carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the 

United States or its coalition partners. 

(3) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—For purposes of this 

subsection, the disposition of a person under the law of war has 

the meaning given in section 1021(c), except that no transfer 

otherwise described in paragraph (4) of that section shall be 

made unless consistent with the requirements of section 1028. 

(4) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY.—The President may 

waive the requirement of paragraph (1) if the President submits 

to Congress a certification in writing that such a waiver is in 

the national security interests of the United States. 

(b) APPLICABILITY TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND LAWFUL

RESIDENT ALIENS.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
268 

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS.—The requirement to detain a 

person in military custody under this section does not extend to 

citizens of the United States. 

(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS.—The requirement to detain 

a person in military custody under this section does not extend 

to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of 

conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the President shall issue, and submit 

to Congress, procedures for implementing this section. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The procedures for implementing this section shall include, but not be limited to, procedures as follows: 

(A) Procedures designating the persons authorized to 

make determinations under subsection (a)(2) and the process by which such determinations are to be made. 

(B) Procedures providing that the requirement for military custody under subsection (a)(1) does not require the 

interruption of ongoing surveillance or intelligence gathering with regard to persons not already in the custody or 

control of the United States. 

(C) Procedures providing that a determination under 

subsection (a)(2) is not required to be implemented until 

after the conclusion of an interrogation which is ongoing at 

the time the determination is made and does not require 

the interruption of any such ongoing interrogation. 

(D) Procedures providing that the requirement for military custody under subsection (a)(1) does not apply when 

intelligence, law enforcement, or other Government officials 

of the United States are granted access to an individual 

who remains in the custody of a third country. 

(E) Procedures providing that a certification of national security interests under subsection (a)(4) may be 

granted for the purpose of transferring a covered person 

from a third country if such a transfer is in the interest of 

the United States and could not otherwise be accomplished. 

(d) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to 

affect the existing criminal enforcement and national security authorities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other domestic law enforcement agency with regard to a covered person, regardless whether such covered person is held in military custody. 

(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on the date 

that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

apply with respect to persons described in subsection (a)(2) who are 

taken into the custody or brought under the control of the United 

States on or after that effective date. 

SEC. 1023. PROCEDURES FOR PERIODIC DETENTION REVIEW OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, 

GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) PROCEDURES REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth 

procedures for implementing the periodic review process required by 

Executive Order No. 13567 for individuals detained at United 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
269 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 

1541 note). 

(b) COVERED MATTERS.—The procedures submitted under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum— 

(1) clarify that the purpose of the periodic review process is 

not to determine the legality of any detainee’s law of war detention, but to make discretionary determinations whether or not 

a detainee represents a continuing threat to the security of the 

United States; 

(2) clarify that the Secretary of Defense is responsible for 

any final decision to release or transfer an individual detained 

in military custody at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Executive Order referred to 

in subsection (a), and that in making such a final decision, the 

Secretary shall consider the recommendation of a periodic review board or review committee established pursuant to such 

Executive Order, but shall not be bound by any such recommendation; 

(3) clarify that the periodic review process applies to any 

individual who is detained as an unprivileged enemy belligerent at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

at any time; and 

(4) ensure that appropriate consideration is given to factors 

addressing the need for continued detention of the detainee, including— 

(A) the likelihood the detainee will resume terrorist activity if transferred or released; 

(B) the likelihood the detainee will reestablish ties with 

al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners if transferred or released; 

(C) the likelihood of family, tribal, or government rehabilitation or support for the detainee if transferred or released; 

(D) the likelihood the detainee may be subject to trial 

by military commission; and 

(E) any law enforcement interest in the detainee. 

(c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1024. PROCEDURES FOR STATUS DETERMINATIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the procedures for determining the status of persons detained pursuant to the 

Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 

U.S.C. 1541 note) for purposes of section 1021. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF PROCEDURES.—The procedures required by 

this section shall provide for the following in the case of any 

unprivileged enemy belligerent who will be held in long-term detenVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00299 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
270 

tion under the law of war pursuant to the Authorization for Use of 

Military Force: 

(1) A military judge shall preside at proceedings for the determination of status of an unprivileged enemy belligerent. 

(2) An unprivileged enemy belligerent may, at the election 

of the belligerent, be represented by military counsel at proceedings for the determination of status of the belligerent. 

(c) APPLICABILITY.—The Secretary of Defense is not required to 

apply the procedures required by this section in the case of a person 

for whom habeas corpus review is available in a Federal court. 

(d) REPORT ON MODIFICATION OF PROCEDURES.—The Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 

a report on any modification of the procedures submitted under this 

section. The report on any such modification shall be so submitted 

not later than 60 days before the date on which such modification 

goes into effect. 

(e) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1025. REQUIREMENT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY PROTOCOLS GOVERNING DETAINEE COMMUNICATIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and 

submit to the congressional defense committees a national security 

protocol governing communications to and from individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 

107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), and related issues. 

(b) CONTENTS.—The protocol developed pursuant to subsection 

(a) shall include Department of Defense policies and procedures regarding each of the following: 

(1) Detainee access to military or civilian legal representation, or both, including any limitations on such access and the 

manner in which any applicable legal privileges will be balanced with national security considerations. 

(2) Detainee communications with persons other than Federal Government personnel and members of the Armed Forces, 

including meetings, mail, phone calls, and video teleconferences, including— 

(A) any limitations on categories of information that 

may be discussed or materials that may be shared; and 

(B) the process by which such communications or materials are to be monitored or reviewed. 

(3) The extent to which detainees may receive visits by persons other than military or civilian representatives. 

(4) The measures planned to be taken to implement and enforce the provisions of the protocol. 

(c) UPDATES.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of any significant change to the policies 

and procedures described in the protocol submitted pursuant to subsection (a) not later than 30 days after such change is made. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
271 

(d) FORM OF PROTOCOL.—The protocol submitted pursuant to 

subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form. 

SEC. 1026. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 

STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal 

year 2012 may be used to construct or modify any facility in the 

United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual 

detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by Congress. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not 

apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(c) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 1028(e)(2). 

(d) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1034 of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4353) is amended by striking subsections (a), (b), and (c). 

SEC. 1027. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 

OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 

STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for 

fiscal year 2012 may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the 

transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or 

possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee 

who— 

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; and 

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 

SEC. 1028. REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE 

TRANSFER OF DETAINEES AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES 

AND OTHER FOREIGN ENTITIES. 

(a) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO TRANSFER.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) and 

subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any 

amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to 

the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 to transfer any 

individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of 

the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or 

any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 

30 days before the transfer of the individual. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained 

at Guantanamo to effectuate— 

(A) an order affecting the disposition of the individual 

that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
272 

United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance); or 

(B) a pre-trial agreement entered in a military commission case prior to the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) CERTIFICATION.—A certification described in this subsection 

is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the 

Director of National Intelligence, that— 

(1) the government of the foreign country or the recognized 

leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained 

at Guantanamo is to be transferred— 

(A) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a 

designated foreign terrorist organization; 

(B) maintains control over each detention facility in 

which the individual is to be detained if the individual is 

to be housed in a detention facility; 

(C) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a 

threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual; 

(D) has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the 

United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future; 

(E) has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that 

the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist 

activity; and 

(F) has agreed to share with the United States any information that— 

(i) is related to the individual or any associates of 

the individual; and 

(ii) could affect the security of the United States, 

its citizens, or its allies; and 

(2) includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified 

form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to the Secretary’s 

certifications. 

(c) PROHIBITION IN CASES OF PRIOR CONFIRMED RECIDIVISM.— (1) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) and 

subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any 

amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 

available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the 

individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any 

other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, 

who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained 

at Guantanamo to effectuate— 

(A) an order affecting the disposition of the individual 

that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the 

United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance); or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
273 

(B) a pre-trial agreement entered in a military commission case prior to the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(d) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the 

applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1) 

or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the 

rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c) and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, determines that— 

(A) alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be 

waived; 

(B) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) 

of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks 

addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with 

regard to the individual to be transferred; 

(C) in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken 

under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk 

of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and 

(D) the transfer is in the national security interests of 

the United States. 

(2) REPORTS.—Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before 

the transfer of the individual concerned, the following: 

(A) A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned. 

(B) A statement of the basis for the determination, including— 

(i) an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States; and 

(ii) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or 

(E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not 

possible to certify that the risks addressed in the subparagraph to be waived have been completely eliminated. 

(C) A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to 

address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks 

addressed in, the subparagraph or subsection to be waived. 

(D) The assessment required by subsection (b)(2). 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
274 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ means 

any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— 

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

(B) is— 

(i) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or 

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(3) The term ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 

219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 

(f) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1033 of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4351) is repealed. 

SEC. 1029. REQUIREMENT FOR CONSULTATION REGARDING PROSECUTION OF TERRORISTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Before seeking an indictment of, or otherwise 

charging, an individual described in subsection (b) in a Federal 

court, the Attorney General shall consult with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense about— 

(1) whether the more appropriate forum for prosecution 

would be a Federal court or a military commission; and 

(2) whether the individual should be held in civilian custody or military custody pending prosecution. 

(b) APPLICABILITY.—The consultation requirement in subsection 

(a) applies to— 

(1) a person who is subject to the requirements of section 

1022, in accordance with a determination made pursuant to 

subsection (a)(2) of such section; and 

(2) any other person who is held in military detention outside of the United States pursuant to the authority affirmed by 

section 1021. 

SEC. 1030. CLARIFICATION OF RIGHT TO PLEAD GUILTY IN TRIAL OF 

CAPITAL OFFENSE BY MILITARY COMMISSION. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF RIGHT.—Section 949m(b)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (C), by inserting before the semicolon 

the following: ‘‘, or a guilty plea was accepted and not withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence in accordance 

with section 949i(b) of this title’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘on the sentence’’ 

after ‘‘vote was taken’’. 

(b) PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS.—Section 949i of such title is 

amended— 

(1) in the first sentence of subsection (b)— 

(A) by inserting after ‘‘military judge’’ the following: ‘‘, 

including a charge or specification that has been referred 

capital,’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘by the military judge’’ after ‘‘may be 

entered’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
275 

(C) by inserting ‘‘by the members’’ after ‘‘vote’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS.—(1) A plea of guilty made by the 

accused that is accepted by a military judge under subsection (b) 

and not withdrawn prior to announcement of the sentence may form 

the basis for an agreement reducing the maximum sentence approved by the convening authority, including the reduction of a sentence of death to a lesser punishment, or that the case will be referred to a military commission under this chapter without seeking 

the penalty of death. Such an agreement may provide for terms and 

conditions in addition to a guilty plea by the accused in order to 

be effective. 

‘‘(2) A plea agreement under this subsection may not provide for 

a sentence of death imposed by a military judge alone. A sentence 

of death may only be imposed by the unanimous vote of all members 

of a military commission concurring in the sentence of death as provided in section 949m(b)(2)(D) of this title.’’. 

SEC. 1031. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFING REQUIREMENT. 

(a) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.—Beginning not later than March 1, 

2012, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities involving 

special operations forces. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A global update on activity within each geographic combatant command. 

(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues including 

limitations. 

(3) An outline of interagency activities and initiatives. 

(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

SEC. 1032. NATIONAL SECURITY PLANNING GUIDANCE TO DENY SAFE 

HAVENS TO AL-QAEDA AND ITS VIOLENT EXTREMIST AFFILIATES. 

(a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this section is to improve interagency strategic planning and execution to more effectively integrate 

efforts to deny safe havens and strengthen at-risk states to further 

the goals of the National Security Strategy related to the disruption, 

dismantlement, and defeat of al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates. 

(b) NATIONAL SECURITY PLANNING GUIDANCE.— 

(1) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—The President shall issue classified or unclassified national security planning guidance in support of objectives stated in the national security strategy report 

submitted to Congress by the President pursuant to section 108 

of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a) to deny 

safe havens to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates and 

to strengthen at-risk states. Such guidance shall serve as the 

strategic plan that governs United States and coordinated international efforts to enhance the capacity of governmental and 

nongovernmental entities to work toward the goal of eliminating the ability of al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates 

to establish or maintain safe havens. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
276 

(2) CONTENTS OF GUIDANCE.—The guidance required under 

paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: 

(A) A prioritized list of specified geographic areas that 

the President determines are necessary to address and an 

explicit discussion and list of the criteria or rationale used 

to prioritize the areas on the list, including a discussion of 

the conditions that would hamper the ability of the United 

States to strengthen at-risk states or other entities in such 

areas. 

(B) For each specified geographic area, a description, 

analysis, and discussion of the core problems and contributing issues that allow or could allow al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates to use the area as a safe haven from 

which to plan and launch attacks, engage in propaganda, 

or raise funds and other support, including any ongoing or 

potential radicalization of the population, or to use the area 

as a key transit route for personnel, weapons, funding, or 

other support. 

(C) A list of short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals 

for each specified geographic area, prioritized by importance. 

(D) A description of the role and mission of each Federal department and agency involved in executing the guidance, including the Departments of Defense, Justice, Treasury, and State and the Agency for International Development. 

(E) A description of gaps in United States capabilities 

to meet the goals listed pursuant to subparagraph (C), and 

the extent to which those gaps can be met through coordination with nongovernmental, international, or private sector organizations, entities, or companies. 

(3) REVIEW AND UPDATE OF GUIDANCE.—The President shall 

review and update the guidance required under paragraph (1) 

as necessary. Any such review shall address each of the following: 

(A) The overall progress made toward achieving the 

goals listed pursuant to paragraph (2)(C), including an 

overall assessment of the progress in denying a safe haven 

to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates. 

(B) The performance of each Federal department and 

agency involved in executing the guidance. 

(C) The performance of the unified country team and 

appropriate combatant command, or in the case of a crossborder effort, country teams in the area and the appropriate 

combatant command. 

(D) Any addition to, deletion from, or change in the 

order of the prioritized list maintained pursuant to paragraph (2)(A). 

(4) SPECIFIED GEOGRAPHIC AREA DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘specified geographic area’’ means any country, 

subnational territory, or region— 

(A) that serves or may potentially serve as a safe haven 

for al-Qaeda or a violent extremist affiliate of al-Qaeda— 

(i) from which to plan and launch attacks, engage 

in propaganda, or raise funds and other support; or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
277 

(ii) for use as a key transit route for personnel, 

weapons, funding, or other support; and 

(B) over which one or more governments or entities 

exert insufficient governmental or security control to deny 

al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates the ability to 

establish a large scale presence. 

SEC. 1033. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE REWARDS FOR COMBATING TERRORISM. 

Section 127b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(3)(C), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ 

and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2013’’; and 

(2) in subsection (f)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘December’’ and inserting ‘‘February’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting ‘‘and the 

recipient’s geographic location’’ after ‘‘reward’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(E) A description of the status of program implementation in each geographic combatant command. 

‘‘(F) A description of efforts to coordinate and de-conflict the authority under subsection (a) with similar rewards programs administered by the United States Government. 

‘‘(G) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program 

in meeting its objectives.’’. 

SEC. 1034. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS 

ACT OF 2009. 

(a) REFERENCE TO HOW CHARGES ARE MADE.—Section 

949a(b)(2)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

‘‘preferred’’ in clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting ‘‘sworn’’. 

(b) JUDGES OF UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY COMMISSION REVIEW.—Section 949b(b) of such title is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘a military appellate 

judge or other duly appointed judge under this chapter on’’ and 

inserting ‘‘a judge on’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘a military appellate judge 

on’’ and inserting ‘‘a judge on’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘an appellate military 

judge or a duly appointed appellate judge on’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

judge on’’. 

(c) PANELS OF UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY COMMISSION REVIEW.—Section 950f(a) of such title is amended by striking 

‘‘appellate military judges’’ in the second sentence and inserting 

‘‘judges on the Court’’. 

(d) REVIEW OF FINAL JUDGMENTS BY UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT.— 

(1) CLARIFICATION OF MATTER SUBJECT TO REVIEW.—Subsection (a) of section 950g of such title is amended by inserting 

‘‘as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by’’ after ‘‘where 

applicable,’’. 

(2) CLARIFICATION ON TIME FOR SEEKING REVIEW.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
278 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘by the accused’’ and all that follows through ‘‘which—’’ 

and inserting ‘‘in the Court of Appeals—’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘not later than 20 days after the 

date on which’’ after ‘‘(1)’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘on the accused or on defense counsel’’ and inserting ‘‘on the parties’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘if’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 

(ii) by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, 

not later than 20 days after the date on which such notice is submitted’’. 

Subtitle E—Nuclear Forces 

SEC. 1041. BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT AND REPORT ON THE DELIVERY 

PLATFORMS FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND THE NUCLEAR 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by adding after section 490 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 490a. Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and the nuclear command and control system 

‘‘(a) BIENNIAL ASSESSMENTS.—(1) For each even-numbered 

year, each covered official shall assess the safety, security, reliability, sustainability, performance, and military effectiveness of the 

systems described in paragraph (2) for which such official has responsibility. 

‘‘(2) The systems described in this paragraph are the following: 

‘‘(A) Each type of delivery platform for nuclear weapons. 

‘‘(B) The nuclear command and control system. 

‘‘(b) BIENNIAL REPORT.—(1) Not later than December 1 of each 

even-numbered year, each covered official shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Nuclear Weapons Council established by 

section 179 of this title a report on the assessments conducted under 

subsection (a). 

‘‘(2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

‘‘(A) The results of the assessment. 

‘‘(B) An identification and discussion of any capability gaps 

or shortfalls with respect to the systems described in subsection 

(a)(2) covered under the assessment. 

‘‘(C) An identification and discussion of any risks with respect to meeting mission or capability requirements. 

‘‘(D) In the case of an assessment by the Commander of the 

United States Strategic Command, if the Commander identifies 

any deficiency with respect to a nuclear weapons delivery platform covered under the assessment, a discussion of the relative 

merits of any other nuclear weapons delivery platform type or 

compensatory measure that would accomplish the mission of 

such nuclear weapons delivery platform. 

‘‘(E) An identification and discussion of any matter having 

an adverse effect on the capability of the covered official to accurately determine the matters covered by the assessment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
279 

‘‘(c) REPORT TO PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS.—(1) Not later than 

March 1 of each year following a year for which a report under subsection (b) is submitted, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

President a report containing— 

‘‘(A) each report under subsection (b) submitted during the 

previous year, as originally submitted to the Secretary; 

‘‘(B) any comments that the Secretary considers appropriate 

with respect to each such report; 

‘‘(C) any conclusions that the Secretary considers appropriate with respect to the safety, security, reliability, sustainability, performance, or military effectiveness of the systems described in subsection (a)(2); and 

‘‘(D) any other information that the Secretary considers appropriate. 

‘‘(2) Not later than March 15 of each year during which a report 

under paragraph (1) is submitted, the President shall transmit to 

the congressional defense committees the report submitted to the 

President under paragraph (1), including any comments the President considers appropriate. 

‘‘(3) Each report under this subsection may be in classified form 

if the Secretary of Defense determines it necessary. 

‘‘(d) COVERED OFFICIAL DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘covered official’ means— 

‘‘(1) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command; 

‘‘(2) the Director of the Strategic Systems Program of the 

Navy; and 

‘‘(3) the Commander of the Global Strike Command of the 

Air Force.’’. 

(b) INITIAL ASSESSMENT AND REPORTS.— Not later than 30 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, each covered official, 

as such term is defined in subsection (d) of section 490a of title 10, 

United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall conduct an 

initial assessment as described by subsection (a) of such section and 

submit an initial report as described by subsection (b) of such section. The requirements of subsection (c) of such section shall apply 

with respect to the report submitted under this subsection. 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item related 

to section 490 the following new item: 

‘‘490a. Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear weapons 

and the nuclear command and control system.’’. 

SEC. 1042. PLAN ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW START TREATY. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Air Force, and 

the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a plan for the Department 

of Defense to implement the nuclear force reductions, limitations, 

and verification and transparency measures contained in the New 

START Treaty. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
280 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description of the nuclear force structure of the United 

States under the New START Treaty, including— 

(A) the composition of intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine launched ballistic missiles, and bombers; 

(B) the planned composition of the types and quantity 

of warheads for each delivery vehicle described in subparagraph (A); 

(C) the number of nondeployed and retired warheads; 

and 

(D) the plans for maintaining the flexibility of the nuclear force structure within the limits of the New START 

Treaty. 

(2) A description of changes necessary to implement the reductions, limitations, and verification and transparency measures contained in the New START Treaty, including— 

(A) how each military department plans to implement 

such changes; and 

(B) an identification of any programmatic, operational, 

or policy effects resulting from such changes. 

(3) The total costs associated with the reductions, limitations, and verification and transparency measures contained in 

the New START Treaty, and the funding profile by year and 

program element. 

(4) An implementation schedule and associated key decision 

points. 

(5) A description of options for and feasibility of accelerating the implementation of the New START Treaty, including a description of any potential cost savings, benefits, or risks 

resulting from such acceleration. 

(6) Any other information the Secretary considers necessary. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date on which the plan is submitted under subsection (a), 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a review of the plan. 

(d) FORM.—The plan under subsection (a) and the review under 

subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(e) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the United States 

of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further 

Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on 

April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011. 

SEC. 1043. ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PLAN FOR THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX, NUCLEAR 

WEAPONS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM. 

(a) REPORT ON THE PLAN FOR THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX, NUCLEAR WEAPONS DELIVERY

SYSTEMS, AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Together with the budget of the President 

submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United 

States Code, for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2019, the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
281 

President, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Energy, shall transmit to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a detailed report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) A detailed description of the plan to enhance the 

safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons 

stockpile of the United States. 

(B) A detailed description of the plan to sustain and 

modernize the nuclear weapons complex, including improving the safety of facilities, modernizing the infrastructure, 

and maintaining the key capabilities and competencies of 

the nuclear weapons workforce, including designers and 

technicians. 

(C) A detailed description of the plan to maintain, 

modernize, and replace delivery systems for nuclear weapons. 

(D) A detailed description of the plan to sustain and 

modernize the nuclear weapons command and control system. 

(E) A detailed description of any plans to retire, dismantle, or eliminate any nuclear warheads or bombs, nuclear weapons delivery systems, or any platforms (including 

silos and submarines) which carry such nuclear warheads, 

bombs, or delivery systems. 

(F) A detailed estimate of budget requirements, including the costs associated with the plans outlined under subparagraphs (A) through (E), over the 10-year period following the date of the report. 

(G) A detailed description of the steps taken to implement the plan submitted in the previous year, including 

difficulties encountered in implementing the plan in the 

previous year. 

(b) FORM.—The reports under subsection (a) shall be submitted 

in unclassified form (including as much detail as possible), but may 

include a classified annex. 

SEC. 1044. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NUCLEAR FORCE REDUCTIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) any reductions in the nuclear forces of the United States 

should be supported by a thorough assessment of the strategic 

environment, threat, and policy and the technical and operational implications of such reductions; and 

(2) specific criteria are necessary to guide future decisions 

regarding further reductions in the nuclear forces of the United 

States. 

SEC. 1045. NUCLEAR FORCE REDUCTIONS. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW START TREATY.— 

(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the Sense of Congress that— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
282 

(A) the United States is committed to maintaining a 

safe, secure, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrent; 

(B) the United States should undertake and support an 

enduring stockpile stewardship program and maintain and 

modernize nuclear weapons production capabilities and capacities to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent and to meet requirements for hedging against possible international developments or technical problems; 

(C) the United States should maintain nuclear weapons laboratories and plants and preserve the intellectual infrastructure, including competencies and skill sets; and 

(D) the United States should provide the necessary resources to achieve these goals, using as a starting point the 

levels set forth in the President’s 10-year plan provided to 

Congress pursuant to section 1251 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2549). 

(2) REPORT.—If the President determines that an appropriations Act is enacted that fails to meet the resource requirements set forth in the plan referred to in section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549), or, if at any time, determines that 

more resources are required to carry out such plan than were 

estimated, the President shall submit to Congress, within 60 

days of making such a determination, a report detailing— 

(A) a plan to address the resource shortfall; 

(B) if more resources are required to carry out the plan 

than were estimated, the level of funding needed, and a detailed explanation of the purpose or purposes for which the 

additional resources will be used; 

(C) any effects on the safety, security, reliability, or 

credibility of United States nuclear forces due to the shortfall or the identified additional resources required; and 

(D) an explanation of whether any planned reductions 

in United States nuclear forces are still in the national interest of the United States in view of the resource shortfall 

or the identification of additional required resources. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT ON THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE OF

THE UNITED STATES.— 

(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(A) sustained investments in the nuclear weapons 

stockpile and the nuclear security complex are needed to ensure a safe, secure, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrent; 

and 

(B) such investments could enable additional future reductions in the hedge stockpile. 

(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2012, and 

annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States that includes the following: 

(A) An accounting of the weapons in the stockpile as of 

the end of the fiscal year preceding the submission of the 

report that includes all weapons in the active and inactive 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
283 

stockpiles, both deployed and non-deployed, and all categories and readiness states of such weapons. 

(B) The planned force levels for each category of nuclear weapon over the course of the future-years defense 

program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 

10, United States Code, for the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted. 

(c) NET ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR FORCE LEVELS REQUIRED

WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PROPOSALS TO REDUCE THE NUCLEAR

WEAPONS STOCKPILE OF THE UNITED STATES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If, during any year beginning after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the President makes a proposal described in subsection (b)— 

(A) the Commander of United States Strategic Command shall conduct a net assessment of the current and 

proposed nuclear forces of the United States and of other 

countries that possess nuclear weapons to determine whether the nuclear forces of the United States are anticipated to 

be capable of meeting the objectives of the United States 

with respect to nuclear deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance of allies, and defense; 

(B) the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives the assessment described in subparagraph (A), 

unchanged, together with the explanatory views of the Secretary, as the Secretary deems appropriate; and 

(C) the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report describing the current capacities of the United States 

nuclear weapons infrastructure to respond to a strategic development or technical problem in the United States nuclear weapons stockpile. 

(2) PROPOSAL DESCRIBED.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B), a proposal described in this paragraph is a proposal 

to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the active or 

inactive stockpiles of the United States to a level that is 

lower than the level on the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

(B) EXCEPTIONS.—A proposal described in this paragraph does not include— 

(i) reductions that are a direct result of activities 

associated with routine stockpile stewardship, including stockpile surveillance, logistics, or maintenance; or 

(ii) nuclear weapons retired or awaiting dismantlement on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(3) TERMINATION.—The requirement in paragraph (1) shall 

terminate on December 31, 2017. 

SEC. 1046. NUCLEAR EMPLOYMENT STRATEGY OF THE UNITED 

STATES. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) any future modification to the nuclear employment 

strategy of the United States should maintain or enhance the 

ability of the nuclear forces of the United States to support the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
284 

goals of the United States with respect to nuclear deterrence, extended deterrence, and assurances for allies, and the defense of 

the United States; and 

(2) the oversight responsibility of Congress includes oversight of the nuclear employment strategy of the United States 

and that therefore the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, and such professional staff as they designate, 

should have access to the nuclear employment strategy of the 

United States. 

(b) REPORTS ON MODIFICATION OF STRATEGY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 491. Nuclear employment strategy of the United States: reports on modification of strategy 

‘‘On the date on which the President issues a nuclear employment strategy of the United States that differs from the nuclear employment strategy of the United States then in force, the President 

shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the following: 

‘‘(1) A description of the modifications to nuclear employment strategy of the United States made by the strategy so 

issued. 

‘‘(2) An assessment of effects of such modification for the 

nuclear posture of the United States. 

‘‘(3) The implication of such changes on the flexibility and 

resilience of the strategic forces of the United States and the 

ability of such forces to support the goals of the United States 

with respect to nuclear deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance, and defense.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by adding at the 

end the following new item: 

‘‘491. Nuclear employment strategy of the United States: reports on modification of 

strategy.’’. 

SEC. 1047. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON NUCLEAR WEAPON 

CAPABILITIES AND FORCE STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) COMPTROLLER GENERAL STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the 

strategic nuclear weapons capabilities, force structure, employment 

policy, and targeting requirements of the Department of Defense. 

(b) MATTERS COVERED.—The study conducted under subsection 

(a) shall, at minimum, cover the following: 

(1) An update to the September 1991 report of the Comptroller General (GAO/NSIAD-91-319FS) titled ‘‘Strategic Weapons: Nuclear Weapons Targeting Process’’ that addresses— 

(A) the relationship between the strategic nuclear targeting process and the determination of requirements for 

nuclear weapons and related delivery systems; 

(B) the level of civilian oversight; 

(C) the categories and types of targets; and 

(D) any other matters addressed in such report or are 

otherwise considered appropriate by the Comptroller General. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
285 

(2) The process and rigor used to determine the effectiveness of nuclear weapons capabilities, force structures, employment policies, and targeting requirements in achieving the goals 

of deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance, and defense. 

(3) An assessment of the requirements of the Department of 

Defense for strategic nuclear bomber aircraft and intercontinental ballistic missiles, including assessments of the extent to 

which the Secretary of Defense has— 

(A) determined the force structure and capability requirements for nuclear-capable strategic bomber aircraft, 

bomber-delivered nuclear weapons, and intercontinental 

ballistic missiles; 

(B) synchronized the requirements described in subparagraph (A) with plans to extend the service life of nuclear gravity bombs, nuclear-armed cruise missiles, and 

intercontinental ballistic missile warheads; and 

(C) evaluated long-term intercontinental ballistic missile alert posture requirements and basing options. 

(c) REPORTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees one or more reports on the 

study conducted under subsection (a). 

(2) FORM.—Any report submitted under this subsection may 

be submitted in classified form, but if so submitted, an unclassified version shall also be submitted with such submission or 

at a later date. 

(d) COOPERATION.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretary of 

Energy shall provide the Comptroller General full cooperation and 

access to appropriate officials and information for the purposes of 

conducting this study under subsection (a). 

SEC. 1048. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF JOINT REPLACEMENT FUZE 

PROGRAM. 

Not later than December 31, 2012, the Secretary of the Navy 

and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the feasibility of the joint 

replacement fuze program for nuclear warheads of the Navy and the 

Air Force. The report shall include an assessment of the feasibility 

of including various options in the joint fuze and how the inclusion 

of such options will affect safety, security, reliability, and adaptability, as well as the program schedule and budget. 

Subtitle F—Financial Management 

SEC. 1051. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON CERTIFICATION AND 

CREDENTIAL STANDARDS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 

POSITIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1599d of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 1599d. Financial management positions: authority to prescribe professional certification and credential 

standards 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION

AND CREDENTIAL STANDARDS.—The Secretary of Defense may prescribe professional certification and credential standards for financial management positions within the Department of Defense, inVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00315 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
286 

cluding requirements for formal education and requirements for certifications that individuals have met predetermined qualifications 

set by an agency of Government or by an industry or professional 

group. Any such professional certification or credential standard 

shall be prescribed as a Department regulation. 

‘‘(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive any standard prescribed under subsection (a) whenever the Secretary determines such 

a waiver to be appropriate. 

‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

the Secretary may, in the Secretary’s discretion— 

‘‘(A) require that a standard prescribed under subsection 

(a) apply immediately to all personnel holding financial management positions designated by the Secretary; or 

‘‘(B) delay the imposition of such a standard for a reasonable period to permit persons holding financial management 

positions so designated time to comply. 

‘‘(2) A formal education requirement prescribed under subsection (a) shall not apply to any person employed by the Department in a financial management position before the standard is prescribed. 

‘‘(d) DISCHARGE OF AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

any professional certification or credential standards under subsection (a) through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in 

consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness. 

‘‘(e) REPORTS.—Not later than one year after the effective date 

of any regulations prescribed under subsection (a), or any significant modification of such regulations, the Secretary shall, in conjunction with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, 

submit to Congress a report setting forth the plans of the Secretary 

to provide training to appropriate Department personnel to meet 

any new professional certification or credential standard under such 

regulations or modification. 

‘‘(f) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POSITION DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘financial management position’ means a position or 

group of positions (including civilian and military positions), as 

designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section, that perform, supervise, or manage work of a fiscal, financial management, 

accounting, auditing, cost, or budgetary nature, or that require the 

performance of financial management-related work.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1599d and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘1599d. Financial management positions: authority to prescribe professional certification and credential standards.’’. 

SEC. 1052. RELIABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FINANCIAL 

STATEMENTS. 

Section 1008(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1206; 10 U.S.C. 

113 note) is amended by striking ‘‘Not later than October 31’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Not later than the date that is 180 days prior to the date 

set by the Office of Management and Budget for the submission of 

financial statements’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
287 

SEC. 1053. INCLUSION OF PLAN ON THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 

WORKFORCE IN THE STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN OF 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

Section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 

(f) and (g), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): 

‘‘(e) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT WORKFORCE.—(1) Each strategic 

workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include a separate chapter 

to specifically address the shaping and improvement of the financial 

management workforce of the Department of Defense, including both 

military and civilian personnel of that workforce. 

‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, 

with respect to the financial management workforce of the Department— 

‘‘(A) an assessment of the matters set forth in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (b)(1); 

‘‘(B) a plan of action meeting the requirements set forth in 

subparagraphs (A) through (F) of subsection (b)(2); 

‘‘(C) specific steps that the Department has taken or plans 

to take to develop appropriate career paths for civilian employees in the financial management field and to implement the requirements of section 1599d of this title; and 

‘‘(D) a plan for funding needed improvements in the financial management workforce of the Department through the period of the current future-years defense program under section 

221 of this title, including a description of any continuing 

shortfalls in funding available for that workforce.’’. 

SEC. 1054. TRACKING IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EFFICIENCIES. 

(a) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS.—For each of fiscal years 2012 

through 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 

carry out an assessment of the extent to which the Department of 

Defense has tracked and realized the savings proposed pursuant to 

the initiative led by the Secretary of Defense to identify at least 

$100,000,000,000 in efficiencies during fiscal years 2012 through 

2016. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than October 30 of each of 2012 

through 2016, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment carried out 

under subsection (a) for the fiscal year ending on September 30 of 

that year. Each such report shall include the recommendations of 

the Comptroller General with respect to the matter covered by the 

assessment. 

Subtitle G—Repeal and Modification of Reporting 

Requirements 

SEC. 1061. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER TITLE 10, 

UNITED STATES CODE. 

Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 127a(a) is amended— 

(A) by striking paragraph (3); and 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3). 

(2) Section 184 is amended by striking subsection (h). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
288 

(3)(A) Section 226 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 226. 

(4)(A) Section 427 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I 

of chapter 21 is amended by striking the item relating to section 

427. 

(5) Section 437 is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(6)(A) Section 484 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 484. 

(7)(A) Section 485 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 485. 

(8)(A) Section 486 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 486. 

(9)(A) Section 487 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 487. 

(10)(A) Section 490 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 490. 

(11) Section 983(e)(1) is amended— 

(A) by striking the comma after ‘‘Secretary of Education’’ and inserting ‘‘and’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘, and to Congress’’. 

(12) Section 2010 is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (b); and 

(B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively. 

(13)(A) Section 2282 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 2282. 

(14) Section 2350a(g) is amended by striking paragraph (3). 

(15) Section 2410m is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(16) Section 2485(a) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; and 

(B) by striking paragraph (2). 

(17) Section 2493 is amended by striking subsection (g). 

(18) Section 2515 is amended by striking subsection (d). 

(19)(A) Section 2582 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 153 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 2582. 

(20) Section 2583 is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (f); and 

(B) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f). 

(21) Section 2688 is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of a military department’’; and 

(ii) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3); 

(B) in subsection (d)(2), by striking the second sentence; 

(C) by striking subsection (f); and 

(D) in subsection (h), by striking the last sentence. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
289 

(22)(A) Section 2706 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 160 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 2706. 

(23)(A) Section 2815 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I 

of chapter 169 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2815. 

(24) Section 2825(c)(1) is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A); 

(B) by striking the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting a period; and 

(C) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D). 

(25) Section 2836 is amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of a military department’’; and 

(ii) by striking paragraph (2); 

(B) by striking subsection (f); and 

(C) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f). 

(26) Section 5143 is amended by striking subsection (e). 

(27)(A) Section 7296 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 7296. 

(28) Section 12302(b) is amended by striking the last sentence. 

(29)(A) Section 16137 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1606 

is amended by striking the item relating to section 16137. 

(30) Section 12302(b) is amended by striking the last sentence. 

SEC. 1062. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER ANNUAL 

DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACTS. 

(a) FISCAL YEAR 2010.—Section 219 (123 Stat. 2228) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 

111–84) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(b) FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Section 1504 of The Duncan Hunter 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 

2358 note) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(c) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—Section 885(a)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110–181) is amended by striking the last sentence. 

(d) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is 

amended as follows: 

(1) Section 347 (10 U.S.C. 221 note) is repealed. 

(2) Section 731 (10 U.S.C. 1095c note) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (d); and 

(B) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d). 

(3) Section 732 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking subsection (d). 

(4) Section 1231 (22 U.S.C. 2776a) is repealed. 

(5) Section 1402 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is repealed. 

(e) FISCAL YEAR 2006.—Section 716 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is 

amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
290 

(1) by striking subsection (b); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 

(f) FISCAL YEAR 2005.—The Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375) 

is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 731 (10 U.S.C. 1074 note) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(2) Section 1041 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is repealed. 

(g) FISCAL YEAR 2004.—The National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 586 (117 Stat. 1493) is repealed. 

(2) Section 812 (117 Stat. 1542) is amended by striking 

subsection (c). 

(3) Section 1601(d) (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 

(A) by striking paragraph (5); and 

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively. 

(h) FISCAL YEAR 2002.—Section 232 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is 

amended by striking subsections (c) and (d). 

(i) FISCAL YEAR 2001.—The Floyd D. Spence National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 374 (10 U.S.C. 2851 note) is repealed. 

(2) Section 1212 (114 Stat. 1654A–326) is amended by 

striking subsections (c) and (d). 

(3) Section 1213 (114 Stat. 1654A–327) is repealed. 

(j) FISCAL YEAR 2000.—The National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 723 (10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (d)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (5); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as 

paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

(B) by striking subsection (e). 

(2) Section 1025 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is repealed. 

(3) Section 1035 (113 Stat. 753), as amended by section 

1211 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106– 

398; 114 Stat. 1654A–325), is repealed. 

(k) FISCAL YEAR 1998.—The National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 349 (10 U.S.C. 2702 note) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

(2) Section 743 (111 Stat. 1817) is amended by striking 

subsection (f). 

(l) FISCAL YEAR 1997.—Section 218 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 

2455) is repealed. 

(m) FISCAL YEARS 1992 AND 1993.—Section 2868 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (10 

U.S.C. 2802 note) is repealed. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
291 

(n) FISCAL YEAR 1991.—Section 831 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (l); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection μ1A(1). 

SEC. 1063. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER OTHER 

LAWS. 

(a) TITLE 37.—Section 402a of title 37, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (f); and 

(2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 

(f) and (g), respectively. 

(b) TITLE 38.—Section 3020 of title 38, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (l); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection μ1A(1). 

(c) NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ACT OF 1990.—Section 

172 of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 

12632) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

SEC. 1064. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 

TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE. 

Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 113(j) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (C); 

(ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (A); and 

(iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A), as redesignated by clause (ii), the following new subparagraph 

(B): 

‘‘(B) The amount of direct and indirect support for the stationing of United States forces provided by each host nation.’’; 

(B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). 

(2) Section 116 is amended— 

(A) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); 

and 

(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 

subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) The Secretary may submit the report required by subsection 

(a) by including the materials required in the report as an exhibit 

to the defense authorization request submitted pursuant to section 

113a of this title in the fiscal year concerned.’’. 

(3) Section 127b(f) is amended by striking ‘‘December 1’’ 

and inserting ‘‘February 1’’. 

(4)(A) Section 228 is amended— 

(i) in subsection (a)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY REPORT.—’’ and inserting ‘‘BIANNUAL REPORT.—’’; 

(II) by striking ‘‘a quarterly report’’ and inserting 

‘‘a biannual report’’; and 

(III) by striking ‘‘fiscal-year quarter’’ and inserting 

‘‘two fiscal-year quarters’’; and 

(ii) in subsection (c)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
292 

(II) by striking ‘‘a quarter of a fiscal year after the 

first quarter of that fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘the second two fiscal-year quarters of a fiscal year’’; 

(III) by striking ‘‘the first quarter of that fiscal 

year’’ and inserting ‘‘the first two fiscal-year quarters of 

that fiscal year’’; and 

(IV) by striking paragraph (2). 

(B)(i) The heading of such section is amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘§ 228. Biannual reports on allocation of funds within operation and maintenance budget subactivities’’. 

(ii) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 228 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘228. Biannual reports on allocation of funds within operation and maintenance 

budget subactivities.’’. 

(5) Subsection (f) of section 408 is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(f) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—Whenever the Secretary of 

Defense provides assistance to a foreign nation under this section, 

the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the assistance provided. Each such report shall identify 

the nation to which the assistance was provided and include a description of the type and amount of the assistance provided.’’. 

(6) Section 2482(d)(1) is amended by inserting ‘‘in the 

United States’’ after ‘‘commissary store’’. 

(7) Section 2608(e)(1) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘each quarter’’ and inserting ‘‘the second 

quarter and the fourth quarter’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the preceding quarter’’ and inserting 

‘‘the preceding two quarters’’. 

(8) Section 2645(d) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

(9) Section 2803(b) is amended by striking ‘‘21-day period’’ 

and inserting ‘‘seven-day period’’. 

(10) Section 9514(c) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

(11) Section 10543(c)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘15 days’’ 

and inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

SEC. 1065. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 

OTHER TITLES OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. 

(a) TITLE 32.—Section 908(a) of title 32, United States Code, is 

amended by striking ‘‘After the end of each fiscal year,’’ and inserting ‘‘After the end of any fiscal year during which any assistance 

was provided or activities were carried out under this chapter,’’. 

(b) TITLE 37.—Section 316a(f) of title 37, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘April 1, 

2012’’. 

SEC. 1066. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER ANNUAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACTS. 

(a) FISCAL YEAR 2010.—Section 121(e) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 

Stat. 2212) is amended by striking paragraph (5). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
293 

(b) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—The National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 958 (122 Stat. 297) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘annually thereafter’’ 

and inserting ‘‘by June 30 each year thereafter’’; and 

(B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2014’’. 

(2) Section 1107 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (d)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘beginning with March 1, 2008,’’; 

and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘a report containing’’ after ‘‘to Congress’’; and 

(B) in subsection (e)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Not later than’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘the information’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary shall include in each report 

under subsection (d) the information’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘under this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘under subsection (d)’’. 

(3) Section 1674(c) (122 Stat. 483) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘After submission’’ and all the follows 

through ‘‘that patients,’’ and inserting ‘‘Patients,’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘have not been moved or disestablished 

until’’ and inserting ‘‘may not be moved or disestablished 

until the Secretary of Defense has certified to the congressional defense committees that’’. 

(c) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Subsection (a) of section 1104 of the 

John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2007 (10 U.S.C. note prec. 711) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) REPORTS ON DETAILS AND FELLOWSHIPS OF LONG DURA- TION.—Whenever a member of the Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of Defense serves continuously in the Legislative Branch for more than 12 consecutive months in one or a 

combination of covered legislative details or fellowships, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, within 90 days, and quarterly thereafter for as long as the 

service continues, a report on the service of the member or employee.’’. 

(d) FISCAL YEAR 2001.—Section 1308(c) of the Floyd D. Spence 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (22 U.S.C. 

5959(c)) is amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (7); and 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (7). 

(e) FISCAL YEAR 2000.—The National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 1202(b)(11) (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(G) The Secretary’s certification whether or not any 

military-to-military exchange or contact was conducted 

during the period covered by the report in violation of section 1201(a).’’. 

(2) Section 1201 (10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended by striking subsection (d). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
294 

SEC. 1067. MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 

OTHER LAWS. 

(a) SMALL BUSINESS ACT.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act 

(15 U.S.C. 638) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(7), by inserting ‘‘and including an accounting of funds, initiatives, and outcomes under the Commercialization Pilot Program’’ after ‘‘and (o)(15),’’; and 

(2) in subsection (y), by striking paragraph (5). 

(b) IMPLEMENTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 9/11 COMMIS- SION ACT OF 2007.—Section 1821(b)(2) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (50 U.S.C. 

2911(b)(2)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘of each 

year’’ and inserting ‘‘of each even-numbered year’’. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

SEC. 1068. TRANSMISSION OF REPORTS IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. 

Section 122a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘made available’’ and all that follows through the period 

and inserting the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) made available to the public, upon request submitted 

on or after the date on which such report is submitted to Congress, through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense 

for Public Affairs; and 

‘‘(2) to the maximum extent practicable, transmitted in an 

electronic format.’’. 

SEC. 1069. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT 

PLAN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 231a of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘Not 

later than 45 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year’’; 

and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘include with the defense budget 

materials for each fiscal year’’ and insert ‘‘submit to 

the congressional defense committees’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, the Department of 

the Army,’’ after ‘‘Navy’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘Strategic’’ and inserting ‘‘Intertheater’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (11); 

and 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following new 

paragraphs: 

‘‘(8) Remotely piloted aircraft. 

‘‘(9) Rotary-wing aircraft. 

‘‘(10) Operational support and executive lift aircraft.’’; 

(3) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘national security 

strategy of the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘national military strategy of the United States’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
295 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, the Department of the Army,’’ after ‘‘Navy’’; 

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘national security strategy of the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘national military strategy of the United States’’; 

(iii) in subparagraph (C)— 

(I) by inserting ‘‘investment’’ before ‘‘funding’’; 

(II) by striking ‘‘the program’’ and inserting 

‘‘each aircraft program’’; 

(III) by inserting before the period at the end 

the following: ‘‘, set forth in aggregate for the Department of Defense and in aggregate for each 

military department’’; 

(iv) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (F); 

(v) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(D) The estimated level of annual funding necessary to operate, maintain, sustain, and support each aircraft program 

throughout the life-cycle of the program, set forth in aggregate 

for the Department of Defense and in aggregate for each military department. 

‘‘(E) For each of the cost estimates required by subparagraphs (C) and (D)— 

‘‘(i) a description of whether the cost estimate is derived 

from the cost estimate position of the military department 

or derived from the cost estimate position of the Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation office of the Secretary of Defense; 

‘‘(ii) if the cost estimate position of the military department and the cost estimate position of the Cost Analysis 

and Program Evaluation office differ by more than .5 percent for any aircraft program, an annotated cost estimate 

difference and sufficient rationale to explain the difference; 

and 

‘‘(iii) the confidence or certainty level associated with 

the cost estimate for each aircraft program.’’; 

(vi) in subparagraph (F), as redesignated by clause 

(iv), by inserting ‘‘, the Department of the Army,’’ after 

‘‘Navy’’; 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(3) For any cost estimate required by paragraph (2)(C) or (D), 

for any aircraft program for which the Secretary is required to include in a report under section 2432 of this title, the source of the 

cost information used to prepare the annual aircraft plan, shall be 

sourced from the Selected Acquisition Report data that the Secretary 

plans to submit to the congressional defense committees in accordance with subsection (f) of that section for the year for which the annual aircraft plan is prepared. 

‘‘(4) The annual aircraft procurement plan shall be submitted 

in unclassified form and shall contain a classified annex.’’; 

(4) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘, the Department of the 

Army,’’ after ‘‘Navy’’; 

(5) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
296 

(6) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): 

‘‘(e) ANNUAL REPORT ON AIRCRAFT INVENTORY.—(1) As part of 

the annual plan and certification required to be submitted under 

this section, the Secretary shall include a report on the aircraft in 

the inventory of the Department of Defense. Each such report shall 

include the following, for the year covered by the report: 

‘‘(A) The total number of aircraft in the inventory. 

‘‘(B) The total number of the aircraft in the inventory that 

are active, stated in the following categories (with appropriate 

subcategories for mission aircraft, training aircraft, dedicated 

test aircraft, and other aircraft): 

‘‘(i) Primary aircraft. 

‘‘(ii) Backup aircraft. 

‘‘(iii) Attrition and reconstitution reserve aircraft. 

‘‘(C) The total number of the aircraft in the inventory that 

are inactive, stated in the following categories: 

‘‘(i) Bailment aircraft. 

‘‘(ii) Drone aircraft. 

‘‘(iii) Aircraft for sale or other transfer to foreign governments. 

‘‘(iv) Leased or loaned aircraft. 

‘‘(v) Aircraft for maintenance training. 

‘‘(vi) Aircraft for reclamation. 

‘‘(vii) Aircraft in storage. 

‘‘(D) The aircraft inventory requirements approved by the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(2) Each report submitted under this subsection shall set forth 

each item described in paragraph (1) separately for the regular component of each armed force and for each reserve component of each 

armed force and, for each such component, shall set forth each type, 

model, and series of aircraft provided for in the future-years defense 

program that covers the fiscal year for which the budget accompanying the plan, certification and report is submitted.’’; and 

(7) in subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph 5, by 

striking paragraph (2) and redesignating paragraph (3) as 

paragraph (2). 

(b) SECTION HEADING.—The heading for such section is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 231a. Budgeting for life-cycle cost of aircraft for the Navy, 

Army, and Air Force: annual plan and certification’’. 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to section 231a 

in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘231a. Budgeting for life-cycle cost of aircraft for the Navy, Army, and Air Force: annual plan and certification.’’. 

SEC. 1070. CHANGE OF DEADLINE FOR ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS 

ON NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENT EQUIPMENT. 

Section 10541(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘February 15’’ and inserting ‘‘March 15’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
297 

SEC. 1071. REPORT ON NUCLEAR ASPIRATIONS OF NON-STATE ENTITIES, NUCLEAR WEAPONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS IN 

NON-NUCLEAR WEAPONS STATES AND COUNTRIES NOT 

PARTIES TO THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY, 

AND CERTAIN FOREIGN PERSONS. 

Section 1055(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 50 U.S.C. 2371(a)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and the Permanent’’ and inserting ‘‘the Permanent’’; and 

(2) by inserting before ‘‘a report’’ the following: ‘‘, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives’’. 

SEC. 1072. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT VISION PRESCRIBED IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 270 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees an implementation plan for 

achieving the whole-of-government integration vision prescribed in 

the President’s National Security Strategy of May 2010. The implementation plan shall include— 

(1) a description of ongoing and future actions planned to 

be taken by the President and the Executive agencies to implement organizational changes, programs, and any other efforts 

to achieve each component of the whole-of-government vision 

prescribed in the National Security Strategy; 

(2) a timeline for specific actions taken and planned to be 

taken by the President and the Executive agencies to implement 

each component of the whole-of-government vision prescribed in 

the National Security Strategy; 

(3) an outline of specific actions desired or required to be 

taken by Congress to achieve each component of the whole-ofgovernment vision prescribed in the National Security Strategy, 

including suggested timing and sequencing of actions proposed 

for Congress and the Executive agencies; 

(4) any progress made and challenges or obstacles encountered since May 2010 in implementing each component of the 

whole-of-government vision prescribed in the National Security 

Strategy; and 

(5) such other information as the President determines is 

necessary to understand progress in implementing each component of the whole-of-government vision prescribed in the National Security Strategy. 

(b) ANNUAL UPDATES.—Not later than December 1 of each subsequent year that the National Security Strategy of May 2010 remains the policy of the President, the President shall submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees an update of the implementation plan required under subsection (a). Each such update shall include an explanation of— 

(1) any progress made and challenges or obstacles encountered in implementing each component of the whole-of-government vision prescribed in the National Security Strategy since 

the submission of the implementation plan or most recent update; and 

(2) any modifications to the implementation plan. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
298 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; 

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations, Select Committee on Intelligence, Committee on Homeland Security 

and Government Affairs, Committee on the Budget, Committee on the Judiciary, and Committee on Appropriations 

in the Senate; and 

(C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Committee on Homeland Security, Committee on the Budget, Committee on the Judiciary, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and 

Committee on Appropriations in the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the meaning given that 

term by section 105 of title 5, United States Code. 

SEC. 1073. REPORTS ON RESOLUTION RESTRICTIONS ON THE COMMERCIAL SALE OR DISSEMINATION OF ELETRO-OPTICAL 

IMAGERY COLLECTED BY SATELLITES. 

(a) SECRETARY OF COMMERCE REPORT.— (1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 15, 2012, the 

Secretary of Commerce shall submit to Congress a report setting 

forth the results of a comprehensive review of current restrictions on the resolution of electro-optical (EO) imagery collected 

from satellites that commercial companies may sell or disseminate. The report shall include such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the results of the review. 

(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting the review required 

for purposes of the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary 

shall take into consideration the following: 

(A) Increases in sales of commercial satellite imagery 

that would result from a relaxation of resolution restrictions, and the ensuing benefit to the United States Government, commerce, and academia from an expanding market 

in satellite imagery. 

(B) Current and anticipated deployments of satellites 

built in foreign countries that can or will be able to collect 

imagery at a resolution greater than .5 meter resolution, 

and the sale or dissemination of such imagery. 

(C) The lead-time involved in securing financing, designing, building, and launching the new satellite imagery 

collection capabilities that would be required to enable 

United States commercial satellite companies to match current and anticipated foreign satellite imagery collection capabilities. 

(D) Inconsistencies between the current resolution restrictions on the sale or dissemination of imagery collected 

by United States commercial companies, the availability of 

higher resolution imagery from foreign sources, and the 

National Space Policy of the United States, released by the 

President on June 28, 2010. 

(E) The lack of restrictions on the sale or dissemination 

of high-resolution imagery collected by aircraft. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
299 

(b) INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT.— 

(1) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—Not later than 60 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National 

Intelligence and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence 

shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 

a report setting forth an assessment of the benefits and risks of 

relaxing current resolution restrictions on the electro-optical imagery from satellites that commercial United States companies 

may sell or disseminate, together with recommendations for 

means of protecting national security related information in the 

event of the relaxation of such resolution restrictions. 

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1074. REPORT ON INTEGRATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS 

INTO THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, submit to 

the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following: 

(1) A description and assessment of the rate of progress in 

integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system. 

(2) An assessment of the potential for one or more pilot program or programs on such integration at certain test ranges to 

increase that rate of progress. 

(b) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on 

Appropriations of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1075. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF USING UNMANNED AERIAL 

SYSTEMS TO PERFORM AIRBORNE INSPECTION OF NAVIGATIONAL AIDS IN FOREIGN AIRSPACE. 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the feasibility of using unmanned 

aerial systems to perform airborne flight inspection of electronic signals-in-space from ground-based navigational aids that support aircraft departure, en route, and arrival flight procedures in foreign 

airspace in support of United States military operations. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
300 

SEC. 1076. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF MEDICAL RESEARCH 

AND DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO IMPROVED COMBAT 

CASUALTY CARE. 

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall conduct a review of Department of Defense programs 

and organizations related to, and resourcing of, medical research 

and development in support of improved combat casualty care designed to save lives on the battlefield. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than January 1, 2013, the Comptroller 

General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted under subsection (a), including the following elements: 

(1) A description of current medical combat casualty care 

research and development programs throughout the Department 

of Defense, including basic and applied medical research, technology development, and clinical research. 

(2) An identification of organizational elements within the 

Department that have responsibility for planning and oversight 

of combat casualty care research and development. 

(3) A description of the means by which the Department applies combat casualty care research findings, including development of new medical devices, to improve battlefield care. 

(4) An assessment of the adequacy of the coordination by 

the Department of planning for combat casualty care medical 

research and development and whether or not the Department 

has a coordinated combat casualty care research and development strategy. 

(5) An assessment of the adequacy of resources provided for 

combat casualty care research and development across the Department. 

(6) An assessment of the programmatic, organizational, 

and resource challenges and gaps faced by the Department in 

optimizing investments in combat casualty care medical research and development in order to save lives on the battlefield. 

(7) The extent to which the Department utilizes expertise 

from experts and entities outside the Department with expertise 

in combat casualty care medical research and development. 

(8) An assessment of the challenges faced in rapidly applying research findings and technology developments to improved 

battlefield care. 

(9) Recommendations regarding— 

(A) the need for a coordinated combat casualty care 

medical research and development strategy; 

(B) organizational obstacles or realignments to improve 

effectiveness of combat casualty care medical research and 

development; and 

(C) adequacy of resource support. 

SEC. 1077. REPORTS TO CONGRESS ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE 

FORCE STRUCTURE FOR THE STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAPONS DELIVERY SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES. 

Whenever after the date of the enactment of this Act the President proposes a modification of the force structure for the strategic 

nuclear weapons delivery systems of the United States, the President 

shall submit to Congress a report on the modification. The report 

shall include a description of the manner in which such modification will maintain for the United States a range of strategic nuclear 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
301 

weapons delivery systems appropriate for the current and anticipated threats faced by the United States when compared with the 

current force structure of strategic nuclear weapons delivery systems. 

SEC. 1078. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORTS 

ON THE MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) ASSESSMENT REPORTS REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 30 of each year 

from 2013 through 2018, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 

a report setting forth an assessment of the performance of the 

major automated information system programs of the Department of Defense. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment by the Comptroller General of the 

cost, schedule, and performance of a representative variety 

of major automated information system programs selected 

by the Comptroller General for purposes of such report. 

(B) An assessment by the Comptroller General of the 

level of risk associated with the programs selected under 

subparagraph (A) for purposes of such report, and a description of the actions taken by the Department to manage 

or reduce such risk. 

(C) An assessment by the Comptroller General of the 

extent to which the programs selected under subparagraph 

(A) for purposes of such report employ best practices for the 

acquisition of information technology systems, as identified 

by the Comptroller General, the Defense Science Board, and 

the Department. 

(b) PRELIMINARY REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 2012, the 

Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees 

of Congress a report setting forth the following: 

(A) The metrics to be used by the Comptroller General 

for the reports submitted under subsection (a). 

(B) A preliminary assessment on the matters set forth 

under subsection (a)(2). 

(2) BRIEFINGS.—In developing metrics for purposes of the 

report required by paragraph (1)(A), the Comptroller General 

shall provide the appropriate committees of Congress with periodic briefings on the development of such metrics. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the 

Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee 

on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘major automated information system program’’ has the meaning given that term in section 2445a of title 

10, United States Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
302 

SEC. 1079. REPORT ON DEFENSE DEPARTMENT ANALYTIC CAPABILITIES REGARDING FOREIGN BALLISTIC MISSILE THREATS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the analytic capabilities of the Department of Defense regarding threats from foreign 

ballistic missiles of all ranges. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A description of the current capabilities of the Department of Defense to analyze threats from foreign ballistic missiles of all ranges, including the degree of coordination among 

the relevant analytic elements of the Department. 

(2) A description of any current or foreseeable gaps in the 

analytic capabilities of the Department regarding threats from 

foreign ballistic missiles of all ranges. 

(3) A plan to address any gaps identified pursuant to paragraph (2) during the 5-year period beginning on the date of the 

report. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 1080. REPORT ON APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR SEA 

BATTLE CONCEPT. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to Congress a report on the approved Air Sea Battle Concept, as required by the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review Report, and a plan 

for the implementation of the concept. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) A description of the approved Air Sea Battle Concept. 

(2) An identification and assessment of— 

(A) the materiel solutions required to employ the concept in support of approved operational plans and contingency plans; and 

(B) the risks to approved operational plans and contingency plans resulting from unfulfilled materiel solutions 

identified pursuant to subparagraph (A). 

(3) A summary of the implementation plan, including— 

(A) an assessment of the risks to implementation of the 

approved concept within the current and programmed force 

structure, capabilities, and capacity; 

(B) a description of the criteria that will be used to 

measure progress toward full implementation of the concept; and 

(C) a timeline for implementation of the concept. 

(4) A description and assessment of how current research, 

development, and acquisition priorities in the program of record 

deliver or fail to deliver the materiel solutions identified pursuant to paragraph (2)(A). 

(5) An identification, in order of priority, of the five most 

critical materiel solutions identified pursuant to paragraph 

(2)(A) requiring increased or sustained investment for the implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
303 

(6) An identification, in order of priority, of how the Department will offset the increased costs required by implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept, including an explanation of 

what force structure, capabilities, and programs will be reduced 

and how potentially increased risks based on those reductions 

will be managed relative to other strategic requirements. 

(7) A list of any new organization required to implement 

the concept, including an explanation of the function of each organization and why such functions cannot be assigned to existing organizations. 

(8) A description and assessment of the estimated incremental increases in costs, including the cost of any new organization identified pursuant to paragraph (7), and savings from 

implementing the Air Sea Battle Concept, including the most 

significant reasons for those increased costs and savings. 

(9) A description and assessment of the contributions required from allies and other international partners, including 

the identification and plans for management of related risks, in 

order to implement the Air Sea Battle Concept. 

(10) Such other matters relating to the development and 

implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept as the Secretary 

considers appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in both unclassified and classified form. 

SEC. 1080A. REPORT ON COSTS OF UNITS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS AND THE ACTIVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an 

analysis of the costs of a sample of deployable units of the active components of the Armed Forces and the costs of a sample 

of similar deployable units of the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces. 

(2) SIMILAR UNITS.—For purposes of this subsection, units 

of the active components and reserve components shall be treated as similar if such units have the same table of organization 

and equipment or, as applicable, the same size, structure, personnel, or deployed mission. 

(b) ASSESSMENT OF RESERVE COMPONENT FORCE STRUCTURE

AND END STRENGTHS IN TOTAL FORCE STRUCTURE.—The Secretary 

shall include in the report required by subsection (a) the following: 

(1) An assessment of the advisability of retaining, decreasing, or increasing the number and capability mix of units and 

end strengths of the reserve components of the Armed Forces 

within the total force structure of the Armed Forces. 

(2) The current and most likely anticipated demands for 

military capabilities in support of the National Military Strategy, including the capability and deployment timeline requirements of the contingency plans of the combatant commands. 

(3) Authorities available to access the reserve components of 

the Armed Forces for Federal missions. 

(4) Personnel, equipment, and training readiness, and the 

cost to sustain, mobilize, achieve required pre-deployment readiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00333 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
304 

ness levels, and deploy active component units and reserve component units. 

(5) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the submittal of the report required by subsection 

(a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees the Comptroller General’s evaluation of the report of the Secretary under subsection (a). 

Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

SEC. 1081. AUTHORITY FOR ASSIGNMENT OF CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AS ADVISORS TO FOREIGN MINISTRIES OF DEFENSE. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, carry out a program to assign civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to the 

ministries of defense (or security agencies serving a similar defense 

function) of foreign countries in order to— 

(1) provide institutional, ministerial-level advice, and other 

training to personnel of the ministry to which assigned in support of stabilization or post-conflict activities; or 

(2) assist such ministry in building core institutional capacity, competencies, and capabilities to manage defense-related 

processes. 

(b) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense 

to assign civilian employees under the program under subsection (a) terminates at the close of September 30, 2014. 

(2) CONTINUATION OF ASSIGNMENTS.—Any assignment of a 

civilian employee under subsection (a) before the date specified 

in paragraph (1) may continue after that date, but only using 

funds available for fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014. 

(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than December 30 each year 

through 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 

Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives a report on activities under the program under subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following: 

(1) A list of the defense ministries to which civilian employees were assigned under the program. 

(2) A statement of the number of such employees so assigned. 

(3) A statement of the duration of the various assignments 

of such employees. 

(4) A brief description of the activities carried out such by 

such employees pursuant to such assignments. 

(5) A description of the criteria used to select the defense 

ministries identified in paragraph (1) and the civilian employees so assigned. 

(6) A statement of the cost of each such assignment. 

(7) Recommendations, if any, about changes to the authority, including an assessment of whether expanding the program 

authority to include assignments to bilateral, regional, or multiVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00334 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
305 

lateral international security organizations would advance the 

national security interests of the United States. 

(d) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than December 

30, 2013, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 

to the committees of Congress specified in subsection (c) a report setting forth an assessment of the effectiveness of the advisory services 

provided by civilian employees assigned under the program under 

subsection (a) as of the date of the report in meeting the purposes 

of the program. 

SEC. 1082. EXEMPTION FROM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT FOR 

DATA FILES OF THE MILITARY FLIGHT OPERATIONS 

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS. 

(a) EXEMPTION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 134 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 2254 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 2254a. Data files of military flight operations quality assurance systems: exemption from disclosure under 

Freedom of Information Act 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO EXEMPT CERTAIN DATA FILES FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER FOIA.— 

‘‘(1) The Secretary of Defense may exempt information contained in any data file of the military flight operations quality 

assurance system of a military department from disclosure 

under section 552(b)(3) of title 5, upon a written determination 

that— 

‘‘(A) the information is sensitive information concerning military aircraft, units, or aircrew; and 

‘‘(B) the public interest consideration in the disclosure 

of such information does not outweigh preventing the disclosure of such information. 

‘‘(2) In this section, the term ‘data file’ means a file of the 

military flight operations quality assurance (in this section referred to as ‘MFOQA’) system that contains information acquired or generated by the MFOQA system, including— 

‘‘(A) any data base containing raw MFOQA data; and 

‘‘(B) any analysis or report generated by the MFOQA 

system or which is derived from MFOQA data. 

‘‘(3) Information that is exempt under paragraph (1) from 

disclosure under section 552(b)(3) of title 5 shall be exempt from 

such disclosure even if such information is contained in a data 

file that is not exempt in its entirety from such disclosure. 

‘‘(4) The provisions of paragraph (1) may not be superseded 

except by a provision of law which is enacted after the date of 

the enactment of this section and which specifically cites and 

repeals or modifies those provisions. 

‘‘(b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

regulations for the administration of this section. Such regulations 

shall ensure consistent application of the authority in subsection (a) 

across the military departments. 

‘‘(c) DELEGATION.—The Secretary of Defense may delegate the 

authority to make a determination under subsection (a) to the Director of Administration and Management of the Department. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
306 

‘‘(d) TRANSPARENCY.—Each determination of the Secretary, or 

the Secretary’s designee, under subsection (a) shall be made in writing and accompanied by a statement of the basis for the determination. All such determinations and statements of basis shall be available to the public, upon request, through the Office of the Director 

of Administration and Management.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2254 the following new 

item: 

‘‘2254a. Data files of military flight operations quality assurance systems: exemption 

from disclosure under Freedom of Information Act.’’. 

(b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 2254a of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to any information entered into any data file of the military flight operations quality assurance system before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

SEC. 1083. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT AND FIELDING OF LIGHT 

ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT. 

(a) REPORT ON LIGHT ATTACK AND ARMED RECONNAISSANCE

MISSIONS.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing 

the findings of a review carried out by the Secretary of the capability of the elements of the Department of Defense (including 

any office, agency, activity, or command described in section 

111(b) of title 10, United States Code) that are responsible for 

conducting light attack and armed reconnaissance missions or 

fulfilling requests of partner nations for training in the conduct 

of such missions. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—In conducting the review under 

paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— 

(A) identify any gaps in the ability of the Department 

to conduct light attack and armed reconnaissance missions 

or to fulfill requests of partner nations for training in the 

conduct of such missions; 

(B) identify any unnecessary duplication of efforts between the elements of the Department to procure or field 

aircraft to conduct light attack and armed reconnaissance 

missions or to fulfill requests of partner nations to train in 

the conduct of such missions, including any planned— 

(i) developmental efforts; 

(ii) operational evaluations; or 

(iii) acquisition of such aircraft through procurement or lease; and 

(C) include findings and recommendations the Secretary considers appropriate to address any gaps identified 

under subparagraph (A) or unnecessary duplication of efforts identified under subparagraph (B). 

(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 

may be obligated or expended for the procurement or fielding of 

light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft until the date that is 30 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
307 

days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required by subsection (a). 

SEC. 1084. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR MANUFACTURING BEYOND LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION AT 

CERTAIN PROTOTYPE INTEGRATION FACILITIES. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used for manufacturing beyond low rate 

initial production at a prototype integration facility of any of the following components of the Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command: 

(1) The Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center. 

(2) The Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and 

Engineering Center. 

(3) The Communications-Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center. 

(4) The Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center. 

(b) WAIVER.—The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology may waive the prohibition under 

subsection (a) for a fiscal year if— 

(1) the Assistant Secretary determines that the waiver is 

necessary— 

(A) for reasons of national security; or 

(B) to rapidly acquire equipment to respond to combat 

emergencies; and 

(2) the Assistant Secretary submits to Congress a notification of the waiver together with the reasons for the waiver. 

(c) LOW-RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘low-rate initial production’’ shall be determined in 

accordance with section 2400 of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 1085. USE OF STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES. 

Subject to section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 

U.S.C. 107 note), of the funds made available to the National 

Guard, the Secretary of Defense may use up to $3,000,000 to pay for 

travel and per diem costs associated with the participation of 

United States and foreign civilian and non-defense agency personnel in conducting activities under the State Partnership Program 

of the National Guard. 

Subtitle J—Other Matters 

SEC. 1086. REDESIGNATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS AS MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS IN TITLE 10, 

UNITED STATES CODE, TO CONFORM TO DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE USAGE. 

Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: 

(1) In section 167(j), by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) Military information support operations.’’. 

(2) Section 2011(d)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘psychological 

operations’’ and inserting ‘‘military information support operations’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
308 

SEC. 1087. TERMINATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR APPOINTMENT OF CIVILIAN MEMBERS OF NATIONAL SECURITY EDUCATION 

BOARD BY AND WITH THE ADVICE AND CONSENT OF THE 

SENATE. 

(a) TERMINATION.—Subsection (b)(7) of section 803 of the David 

L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1903) 

is amended by striking ‘‘by and with the advice and consent of the 

Senate,’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

(b)(7)’’. 

SEC. 1088. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON APPLICATION OF MORATORIUM 

ON EARMARKS TO THIS ACT. 

It is the sense of Congress that the moratorium on congressionally-directed spending items in the Senate, and on congressional 

earmarks in the House of Representatives, should be fully enforced 

in this Act. 

SEC. 1089. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. 

Section 382 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘biological or chemical’’ each place it appears in subsections (a) 

and (b). 

SEC. 1090. CYBERSECURITY COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 

(a) INTERDEPARTMENTAL COLLABORATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide personnel, equipment, and facilities in order to increase interdepartmental collaboration with respect to— 

(A) strategic planning for the cybersecurity of the 

United States; 

(B) mutual support for cybersecurity capabilities development; and 

(C) synchronization of current operational cybersecurity 

mission activities. 

(2) EFFICIENCIES.—The collaboration provided for under 

paragraph (1) shall be designed— 

(A) to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of requirements formulation and requests for products, services, 

and technical assistance for, and coordination and performance assessment of, cybersecurity missions executed 

across a variety of Department of Defense and Department 

of Homeland Security elements; and 

(B) to leverage the expertise of each individual Department and to avoid duplicating, replicating, or aggregating 

unnecessarily the diverse line organizations across technology developments, operations, and customer support that 

collectively execute the cybersecurity mission of each Department. 

(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.— 

(1) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.—The Secretary 

of Homeland Security shall identify and assign, in coordination 

with the Department of Defense, a Director of Cybersecurity Coordination within the Department of Homeland Security to undertake collaborative activities with the Department of Defense. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
309 

(2) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall identify and assign, in coordination with the Department 

of Homeland Security, one or more officials within the Department of Defense to coordinate, oversee, and execute collaborative 

activities and the provision of cybersecurity support to the Department of Homeland Security. 

SEC. 1091. TREATMENT UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT OF 

CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY INFORMATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 130d the following new section: 

‘‘§ 130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical infrastructure security information 

‘‘(a) EXEMPTION.—The Secretary of Defense may exempt Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information from 

disclosure pursuant to section 552(b)(3) of title 5, upon a written determination that— 

‘‘(1) the information is Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information; and 

‘‘(2) the public interest consideration in the disclosure of 

such information does not outweigh preventing the disclosure of 

such information. 

‘‘(b) INFORMATION PROVIDED TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information covered by a written determination under subsection (a) 

that is provided to a State or local government shall remain under 

the control of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information’ means sensitive 

but unclassified information that, if disclosed, would reveal 

vulnerabilities in Department of Defense critical infrastructure that, 

if exploited, would likely result in the significant disruption, destruction, or damage of or to Department of Defense operations, 

property, or facilities, including information regarding the securing 

and safeguarding of explosives, hazardous chemicals, or pipelines, 

related to critical infrastructure or protected systems owned or operated by or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including vulnerability assessments prepared by or on behalf of the Department of 

Defense, explosives safety information (including storage and handling), and other site-specific information on or relating to installation security. 

‘‘(d) DELEGATION.—The Secretary of Defense may delegate the 

authority to make a determination under subsection (a) to the Director of Administration and Management. 

‘‘(e) TRANSPARENCY.—Each determination of the Secretary, or 

the Secretary’s designee, under subsection (a) shall be made in writing and accompanied by a statement of the basis for the determination. All such determinations and statements of basis shall be available to the public, upon request, through the Office of the Director 

of Administration and Management.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 

new item: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
310 

‘‘130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain critical infrastructure 

security information.’’. 

SEC. 1092. EXPANSION OF SCOPE OF HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TO INCLUDE STOCKPILED CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ASSISTANCE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 407 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian 

demining assistance’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘Humanitarian 

demining assistance’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (3)— 

(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 

inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian demining assistance’’; and 

(ii) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, or stockpiled conventional munitions, as applicable,’’ after ‘‘explosive remnants of war’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian 

demining assistance’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian 

demining assistance’’; 

(3) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian 

demining assistance’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions activities’’ after ‘‘humanitarian demining activities’’; and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘, or stockpiled conventional munitions, as applicable,’’ after ‘‘explosive remnants of war’’; 

and 

(4) in subsection (d)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or stockpiled conventional munitions 

assistance’’ after ‘‘humanitarian demining assistance’’ each 

place it appears; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, and whether such 

assistance was primarily related to the humanitarian 

demining efforts or stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’’ after ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 

(5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following 

new subsection (e): 

‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘humanitarian demining assistance’, as it relates to training and support, means detection and clearance of 

landmines and other explosive remnants of war, and includes 

activities related to the furnishing of education, training, and 

technical assistance with respect to explosive safety, the detecVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00340 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
311 

tion and clearance of landmines and other explosive remnants 

of war, and the disposal, demilitarization, physical security, 

and stockpile management of potentially dangerous stockpiles of 

explosive ordnance. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘stockpiled conventional munitions assistance’, as it relates to the support of humanitarian assistance efforts, means training and support in the disposal, demilitarization, physical security, and stockpile management of potentially 

dangerous stockpiles of explosive ordnance, and includes activities related to the furnishing of education, training, and technical assistance with respect to explosive safety, the detection 

and clearance of landmines and other explosive remnants of 

war, and the disposal, demilitarization, physical security, and 

stockpile management of potentially dangerous stockpiles of explosive ordnance.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 407. Humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled 

conventional munitions assistance: authority; limitations’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 407 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘407. Humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance: authority; limitations.’’. 

SEC. 1093. NUMBER OF NAVY CARRIER AIR WINGS AND CARRIER AIR 

WING HEADQUARTERS. 

The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the Navy maintains— 

(1) a minimum of 10 carrier air wings; and 

(2) for each such carrier air wing, a dedicated and fully 

staffed headquarters. 

SEC. 1094. DISPLAY OF ANNUAL BUDGET REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CLOTHING AND INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT. 

(a) SUBMISSION WITH ANNUAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENTS.—For fiscal year 2013 and each subsequent fiscal year, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the President, for inclusion 

with the budget materials submitted to Congress under section 

1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a budget justification display that covers all programs and activities associated with the procurement of organizational clothing and individual equipment. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR BUDGET DISPLAY.—The budget justification display under subsection (a) for a fiscal year shall include 

the following: 

(1) The funding requirements in each budget activity and 

for each Armed Force for organizational clothing and individual equipment. 

(2) The amount in the budget for each of the Armed Forces 

for organizational clothing and equipment for that fiscal year. 

(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘organizational clothing and individual equipment’’ means an item of organizational 

clothing or equipment prescribed for wear or use with the uniform. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
312 

SEC. 1095. NATIONAL ROCKET PROPULSION STRATEGY. 

(a) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

the sustainment of the solid rocket motor and liquid rocket engine 

industrial base is a national challenge that spans multiple departments and agencies of the Federal Government and requires the attention of the President. 

(b) STRATEGY REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the President shall transmit to the 

appropriate congressional committees a national rocket propulsion strategy for the United States, including— 

(A) a description and assessment of the effects to programs of the Department of Defense and intelligence community that rely on the solid rocket motor and liquid rocket 

engine industrial base caused by the end of the Space Shuttle program and termination of the Constellation program; 

(B) a description of the plans of the President, the Secretary of Defense, the intelligence community, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to mitigate the impact of the end of the Space 

Shuttle program and termination of the Constellation program on the solid rocket motor and liquid rocket engine 

propulsion industrial base of the United States; 

(C) a consolidated plan that outlines key decision 

points for the current and next-generation mission requirements of the United States with respect to tactical and strategic missiles, missile defense interceptors, targets, and satellite and human spaceflight launch vehicles; 

(D) options and recommendations for synchronizing 

plans, programs, and budgets for research and development, procurement, operations, and workforce among the 

appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to strengthen the solid rocket motor and liquid 

rocket engine propulsion industrial base of the United 

States; and 

(E) any other relevant information the President considers necessary. 

(2) LONG-TERM ICBM PLAN.—On the date on which the 

President submits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2013 

under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the President 

shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a 

long-term plan for maintaining a minimal capacity to produce 

intercontinental ballistic missile solid rocket motors. 

(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(1) The Committees on Armed Services, Science, Space, and 

Technology, Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The Committees on Armed Services, Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation, Appropriations, and the Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the Senate. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
313 

SEC. 1096. GRANTS TO CERTAIN REGULATED COMPANIES FOR SPECIFIED ENERGY PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO NORMALIZATION RULES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 1603(f) of the 

American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 is amended 

by inserting ‘‘(other than subsection (d)(2) thereof)’’ after ‘‘section 50 

of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section 

shall take effect as if included in section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009. 

SEC. 1097. UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 

Administration shall establish a program to integrate unmanned 

aircraft systems into the national airspace system at six test ranges. 

(b) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—In establishing the program 

under subsection (a), the Administrator shall— 

(1) safely designate nonexclusionary airspace for integrated 

manned and unmanned flight operations in the national airspace system; 

(2) develop certification standards and air traffic requirements for unmanned flight operations at test ranges; 

(3) coordinate with and leverage the resources of the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration; 

(4) address both civil and public unmanned aircraft systems; 

(5) ensure that the program is coordinated with the Next 

Generation Air Transportation System; and 

(6) provide for verification of the safety of unmanned aircraft systems and related navigation procedures before integration into the national airspace system. 

(c) LOCATIONS.—In determining the location of a test range for 

the program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall— 

(1) take into consideration geographic and climatic diversity; 

(2) take into consideration the location of ground infrastructure and research needs; and 

(3) consult with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

(d) TEST RANGE OPERATION.— A project at a test range shall 

be operational not later than 180 days after the date on which the 

project is established. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of completing each of the pilot projects, the Administrator shall submit to 

the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the 

Administrator’s findings and conclusions concerning the projects 

that includes a description and assessment of the progress being 

made in establishing special use airspace to fill the immediate need 

of the Department of Defense to develop detection techniques for 

small unmanned aircraft systems and to validate sensor integration 

and operation of unmanned aircraft systems. 

(f) DURATION.—The program under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
314 

(g) DEFINITION.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee 

on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 

Senate. 

(2) The term ‘‘test range’’ means a defined geographic area 

where research and development are conducted. 

SEC. 1098. MODIFICATION OF DATES OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF 

THE UNITED STATES REVIEW OF EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT 

ON JOINT MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, 

NORTH CHICAGO AND GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS. 

Section 1701(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2568) is amended 

by striking ‘‘and annually thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘not later than 

two years after the execution of the executive agreement, and not 

later than September 30, 2015’’. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Personnel 

Sec. 1101. Amendments to Department of Defense personnel authorities. 

Sec. 1102. Provisions relating to the Department of Defense performance management system. 

Sec. 1103. Repeal of sunset provision relating to direct hire authority at demonstration laboratories. 

Sec. 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1105. Waiver of certain pay limitations. 

Sec. 1106. Services of post-combat case coordinators. 

Sec. 1107. Authority to waive maximum-age limit for certain appointments. 

Sec. 1108. Sense of Congress relating to pay parity for Federal employees serving at 

certain remote military installations. 

Sec. 1109. Federal internship programs. 

Sec. 1110. Extension and expansion of experimental personnel program for scientific 

and technical personnel. 

Sec. 1111. Authority of the Secretaries of the military departments to employ up to 

10 persons without pay. 

Sec. 1112. Two-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 1121. Modification of beneficiary designation authorities for death gratuity payable upon death of a United States Government employee in service with 

the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1122. Authority for waiver of recovery of certain payments previously made 

under civilian employees voluntary separation incentive program. 

Sec. 1123. Extension of continued health benefits. 

Sec. 1124. Disclosure of senior mentors. 

Sec. 1125. Termination of Joint Safety Climate Assessment System. 

Subtitle A—Personnel 

SEC. 1101. AMENDMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

AUTHORITIES. 

(a) CAREER PATHS.—Section 9902(a)(1) of title 5, United States 

Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
315 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph 

(E); and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following: 

‘‘(D) Development of attractive career paths.’’. 

(b) APPOINTMENT FLEXIBILITIES.—Section 9902(b) of title 5, 

United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(5) The Secretary shall develop a training program for Department of Defense human resource professionals to implement the requirements of this subsection. 

‘‘(6) The Secretary shall develop indicators of effectiveness to determine whether appointment flexibilities under this subsection have 

achieved the objectives set forth in paragraph (1).’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.—Section 9902(c) of title 5, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs 

(8) and (9), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following: 

‘‘(6) provide mentors to advise individuals on their career 

paths and opportunities to advance and excel within their 

fields; 

‘‘(7) develop appropriate procedures for warnings during 

performance evaluations for employees who fail to meet performance standards;’’. 

(d) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for chapter 99 of 

title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘CHAPTER 99—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

AUTHORITIES’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters for 

part III of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking 

the item relating to chapter 99 and inserting the following: 

‘‘99. Department of Defense Personnel Authorities .............................................. 9901’’. 

SEC. 1102. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9902 of title 5, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(h) REPORTS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the implementation of any performance management and workforce incentive system under subsection (a) or any procedures relating 

to personnel appointment flexibilities under subsection (b) 

(whichever is earlier), and whenever any significant action is 

taken under any of the preceding provisions of this section (but 

at least biennially) thereafter, the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) conduct appropriately designed and statistically 

valid internal assessments or employee surveys to assess 

employee perceptions of any program, system, procedures, 

or other aspect of personnel management, as established or 

modified under authority of this section; and 

‘‘(B) submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 

and the Comptroller General, a report describing the results of the assessments or surveys conducted under subparagraph (A) (including the methodology used), together 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
316 

with any other information which the Secretary considers 

appropriate. 

‘‘(2) REVIEW.—After receiving any report under paragraph 

(1), the Comptroller General— 

‘‘(A) shall review the assessments or surveys described 

in such report to determine if they were appropriately designed and statistically valid; 

‘‘(B) shall conduct a review of the extent to which the 

program, system, procedures, or other aspect of program 

management concerned (as described in paragraph (1)(A)) 

is fair, credible, transparent, and otherwise in conformance 

with the requirements of this section; and 

‘‘(C) within 6 months after receiving such report, shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress— 

‘‘(i) an independent evaluation of the results of the 

assessments or surveys reviewed under subparagraph 

(A), and 

‘‘(ii) the findings of the Comptroller General based 

on the review under subparagraph (B), 

together with any recommendations the Comptroller General considers appropriate. 

‘‘(3) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this subsection, the term 

‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means— 

‘‘(A) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives; 

‘‘(B) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and 

‘‘(C) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives.’’. 

(b) REPORTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

covered committees— 

(A) no later than 12 months after the date of enactment of 

this Act and semiannually thereafter until fully implemented— 

(i) a plan for the personnel management system, as authorized by section 9902(a) of title 5, United States Code 

(as amended by section 1101(a)); and 

(ii) progress reports on the design and implementation 

of the personnel management system (as described in subparagraph (A)); and 

(B) no later than 12 months after the date of enactment of 

this Act and semiannually thereafter until fully implemented— 

(i) a plan for the appointment procedures, as authorized by section 9902(b) of such title 5 (as amended by section 1101(b)); and 

(ii) progress reports on the design and implementation 

of the appointment procedures (as described in subparagraph (A)). 

(2) Implementation of a plan described in paragraph (1)(B) may 

not commence before the 90th day after the date on which such plan 

is submitted under this subsection to the covered committees. 

(3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘covered committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
317 

(B) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and 

(C) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of 

the House of Representatives. 

(c) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS.—The following sections are repealed: 

(1) Section 1106(b) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 357), 

as amended by section 1113(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2503). 

(2) Section 1113(e) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2502). 

SEC. 1103. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION RELATING TO DIRECT HIRE 

AUTHORITY AT DEMONSTRATION LABORATORIES. 

Section 1108 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 

chapter 81 note) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

SEC. 1104. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 

LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS. 

Effective January 1, 2012, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 

Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 

1103 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4382), is further 

amended by striking ‘‘through 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2012’’. 

SEC. 1105. WAIVER OF CERTAIN PAY LIMITATIONS. 

Section 9903(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: 

‘‘(2) An employee appointed under this section is not eligible for 

any bonus, monetary award, or other monetary incentive for service, 

except for— 

‘‘(A) payments authorized under this section; and 

‘‘(B) in the case of an employee who is assigned in support 

of a contingency operation (as defined in section 101(a)(13) of 

title 10), allowances and any other payments authorized under 

chapter 59.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘In computing an employee’s total annual compensation for 

purposes of the preceding sentence, any payment referred to in 

paragraph (2)(B) shall be excluded.’’. 

SEC. 1106. SERVICES OF POST-COMBAT CASE COORDINATORS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 79 of title 5, United States Code, is 

amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘§ 7906. Services of post-combat case coordinators 

‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

‘‘(1) the terms ‘employee’, ‘agency’, ‘injury’, ‘war-risk hazard’, and ‘hostile force or individual’ have the meanings given 

those terms in section 8101; and 

‘‘(2) the term ‘qualified employee’ means an employee as described in subsection (b). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
318 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—The head of each agency shall, in a manner consistent with the guidelines prescribed under subsection (c), 

provide for the assignment of a post-combat case coordinator in the 

case of any employee of such agency who suffers an injury or disability incurred, or an illness contracted, while in the performance 

of such employee’s duties, as a result of a war-risk hazard or during 

or as a result of capture, detention, or other restraint by a hostile 

force or individual. 

‘‘(c) GUIDELINES.—The Office of Personnel Management shall, 

after such consultation as the Office considers appropriate, prescribe 

guidelines for the operation of this section. Under the guidelines, the 

responsibilities of a post-combat case coordinator shall include— 

‘‘(1) acting as the main point of contact for qualified employees seeking administrative guidance or assistance relating 

to benefits under chapter 81 or 89; 

‘‘(2) assisting qualified employees in the collection of documentation or other supporting evidence for the expeditious processing of claims under chapter 81 or 89; 

‘‘(3) assisting qualified employees in connection with the receipt of prescribed medical care and the coordination of benefits 

under chapter 81 or 89; 

‘‘(4) resolving problems relating to the receipt of benefits 

under chapter 81 or 89; and 

‘‘(5) ensuring that qualified employees are properly screened 

and receive appropriate treatment— 

‘‘(A) for post-traumatic stress disorder or other similar 

disorder stemming from combat trauma; or 

‘‘(B) for suicidal or homicidal thoughts or behaviors. 

‘‘(d) DURATION.—The services of a post-combat case coordinator 

shall remain available to a qualified employee until— 

‘‘(1) such employee accepts or declines a reasonable offer of 

employment in a position in the employee’s agency for which the 

employee is qualified, which is not lower than 2 grades (or pay 

levels) below the employee’s grade (or pay level) before the occurrence or onset of the injury, disability, or illness (as referred to 

in subsection (a)), and which is within the employee’s commuting area; or 

‘‘(2) such employee gives written notice, in such manner as 

the employing agency prescribes, that those services are no 

longer desired or necessary.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 79 

of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item 

relating to section 7905 the following: 

‘‘7906. Services of post-combat case coordinators.’’. 

SEC. 1107. AUTHORITY TO WAIVE MAXIMUM-AGE LIMIT FOR CERTAIN 

APPOINTMENTS. 

Section 3307(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(e) The’’ and inserting ‘‘(e)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2)(A) In the case of the conversion of an agency function from 

performance by a contractor to performance by an employee of the 

agency, the head of the agency, in consultation with the Director of 

the Office of Personnel Management, may waive any maximum 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
319 

limit of age, determined or fixed for positions within such agency 

under paragraph (1), if necessary in order to promote the recruitment or appointment of experienced personnel. 

‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph— 

‘‘(i) the term ‘agency’ means the Department of Defense or 

a military department; and 

‘‘(ii) the term ‘head of the agency’ means— 

‘‘(I) in the case of the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense; and 

‘‘(II) in the case of a military department, the Secretary 

of such military department.’’. 

SEC. 1108. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO PAY PARITY FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES SERVING AT CERTAIN REMOTE MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and the 

Director of the Office of Personnel Management should develop procedures for determining locality pay for employees of the Department of Defense in circumstances that may be unique to such employees, such as the assignment of employees to a military installation so remote from the nearest established communities or suitable 

places of residence as to handicap significantly the recruitment or 

retention of well qualified individuals, due to the difference between 

the cost of living at the post of assignment and the cost of living in 

the locality or localities where such employees generally reside. 

SEC. 1109. FEDERAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 31 of title 5, United 

States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3111 the following: 

‘‘§ 3111a. Federal internship programs 

‘‘(a) INTERNSHIP COORDINATOR.—The head of each agency operating an internship program shall appoint an individual within 

such agency to serve as an internship coordinator. 

‘‘(b) ONLINE INFORMATION.— ‘‘(1) AGENCIES.—The Office of Personnel Management shall 

make publicly available on the Internet— 

‘‘(A) the name and contact information of the internship coordinator for each agency; and 

‘‘(B) information regarding application procedures and 

deadlines for each internship program. 

‘‘(2) OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.—The Office of 

Personnel Management shall make publicly available on the 

Internet links to the websites where the information described 

in paragraph (1) is displayed. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

‘‘(1) the term ‘internship program’ means— 

‘‘(A) a volunteer service program under section 3111(b); 

‘‘(B) an internship program established under Executive Order 13562, dated December 27, 2010 (75 Federal 

Register 82585); 

‘‘(C) a program operated by a nongovernment organization for the purpose of providing paid internships in agencies under a written agreement that is similar to an internship program established under Executive Order 13562, 

dated December 27, 2010 (75 Federal Register 82585); or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
320 

‘‘(D) a program that— 

‘‘(i) is similar to an internship program established 

under Executive Order 13562, dated December 27, 

2010 (75 Federal Register 82585); and 

‘‘(ii) is authorized under another statutory provision of law; 

‘‘(2) the term ‘intern’ means an individual participating in 

an internship program; and 

‘‘(3) the term ‘agency’ means an Executive agency.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 31 

of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 3111 the following: 

‘‘3111a. Federal internship programs.’’. 

(c) REGULATIONS.—The Office of Personnel Management may 

prescribe regulations to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a). 

SEC. 1110. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF EXPERIMENTAL PERSONNEL PROGRAM FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) 

is amended in subsection (e)(1) by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting 

‘‘2016’’. 

(b) EXPANSION OF AVAILABILITY OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) not more than a total of 10 scientific and engineering 

positions in the Office of the Director of Operational Test and 

Evaluation;’’. 

SEC. 1111. AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS TO EMPLOY UP TO 10 PERSONS WITHOUT 

PAY. 

Section 1583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the 

first sentence— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘and the Secretaries of the military departments’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’; and 

(2) by inserting ‘‘each’’ after ‘‘may’’. 

SEC. 1112. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO 

GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO 

PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE. 

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, 

and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), 

as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4616), is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 

2011’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2009 through 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
321 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 1121. MODIFICATION OF BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION AUTHORITIES FOR DEATH GRATUITY PAYABLE UPON DEATH OF A 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE IN SERVICE 

WITH THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF

DEATH GRATUITY TO UNRELATED PERSONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 8102a(d) of title 

5, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) by striking the first sentence and inserting ‘‘A person covered by this section may designate another person to 

receive an amount payable under this section.’’; and 

(B) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘up to the maximum of 50 percent’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and 

apply to the payment of a death gratuity based on any death 

occurring on or after that date. 

(b) NOTICE TO SPOUSE OF DESIGNATION OF ANOTHER PERSON

TO RECEIVE PORTION OF DEATH GRATUITY.—Section 8102a(d) of 

such title is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(6) If a person covered by this section has a spouse, but 

designates a person other than the spouse to receive all or a portion of the amount payable under this section, the head of the 

agency, or other entity, in which that person is employed shall 

provide notice of the designation to the spouse.’’. 

SEC. 1122. AUTHORITY FOR WAIVER OF RECOVERY OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY MADE UNDER CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 

VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR WAIVER.—Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subsection 

(f)(6)(B) of section 9902 of title 5, United States Code, for repayment 

to the Department of Defense of a voluntary separation incentive 

payment made under subsection (f)(1) of that section in the case of 

an employee or former employee of the Department of Defense described in subsection (b). 

(b) PERSONS COVERED.—Subsection (a) applies to any employee 

or former employee of the Department of Defense— 

(1) who during the period beginning on April 1, 2004, and 

ending on March 1, 2008, received a voluntary separation incentive payment under subsection (f)(1) of section 9902 of title 

5, United States Code; 

(2) who was reappointed to a position in the Department of 

Defense to support a declared national emergency related to terrorism or a natural disaster during the period beginning on 

June 1, 2004, and ending on March 1, 2008; and 

(3) with respect to whom the Secretary determines— 

(A) that the employee or former employee, before accepting the reappointment referred to in paragraph (2), received 

a representation from an officer or employee of the Department of Defense that recovery of the amount of the payment 

referred to in paragraph (1) would not be required or would 

be waived; and 

(B) that the employee or former employee reasonably relied on that representation when accepting reappointment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
322 

(c) REQUIRED DETERMINATION.—The Secretary of Defense may 

grant a waiver under subsection (a) in the case of any individual 

only if the Secretary determines that recovery of the amount of the 

payment otherwise required would be against equity and good conscience because of the circumstances of that individual’s reemployment after receiving a voluntary separation incentive payment. 

(d) TREATMENT OF PRIOR REPAYMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense may, pursuant to a determination under subsection (c) specific 

to an individual, provide for reimbursement to that individual for 

any amount the individual has previously repaid to the United 

States for a voluntary separation incentive payment covered by this 

section. The reimbursement shall be paid either from the appropriations into which the repayment was deposited, if such appropriations remain available, or from appropriations currently available 

for the purposes of the appropriation into which the repayment was 

deposited. 

(e) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to grant a waiver under this section shall expire on December 31, 2012. 

SEC. 1123. EXTENSION OF CONTINUED HEALTH BENEFITS. 

Section 8905a(d)(4)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2016’’; and 

(2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘February 1, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘February 1, 2017’’. 

SEC. 1124. DISCLOSURE OF SENIOR MENTORS. 

(a) REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE NAMES OF SENIOR MENTORS.— The Secretary of Defense shall disclose the names of senior mentors 

serving in the Department of Defense by publishing a list of the 

names on the publicly available website of the Department of Defense. The list shall be updated at least quarterly. 

(b) SENIOR MENTOR DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘senior 

mentor’’ has the meaning provided in the memorandum from the 

Secretary of Defense relating to policy on senior mentors, dated 

April 1, 2010. 

SEC. 1125. TERMINATION OF JOINT SAFETY CLIMATE ASSESSMENT 

SYSTEM. 

Effective as of October 1, 2011, or the date of the enactment of 

this Act, whichever is later, the Joint Safety Climate Assessment 

System of the Department of Defense is terminated. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1202. Three-year extension of temporary authority to use acquisition and crossservicing agreements to lend military equipment for personnel protection 

and survivability. 

Sec. 1203. Extension and expansion of authority for support of special operations to 

combat terrorism. 

Sec. 1204. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the 

capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1205. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1206. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Sec. 1207. Global Security Contingency Fund. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
323 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 

Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide 

defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. One-year extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or 

bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1215. Authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1216. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure 

projects in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1218. Two-year extension of certain reports on Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1219. Limitation on availability of amounts for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. 

Sec. 1221. Benchmarks to evaluate the progress being made toward the transition 

of security responsibilities for Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1231. Report on Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of 

Pakistan for operations conducted in support of Operation Enduring 

Freedom. 

Sec. 1232. Review and report on Iran’s and China’s conventional and anti-access capabilities. 

Sec. 1233. Report on energy security of the NATO alliance. 

Sec. 1234. Comptroller General of the United States report on the National Guard 

State Partnership Program. 

Sec. 1235. Man-portable air-defense systems originating from Libya. 

Sec. 1236. Report on military and security developments involving the Democratic 

People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1237. Sense of Congress on non-strategic nuclear weapons and extended deterrence policy. 

Sec. 1238. Annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1239. Report on expansion of participation in Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot 

Training program. 

Sec. 1240. Report on Russian nuclear forces. 

Sec. 1241. Report on progress of the African Union in operationalizing the African 

Standby Force. 

Sec. 1242. Defense cooperation with Republic of Georgia. 

Sec. 1243. Prohibition on procurements from Communist Chinese military companies. 

Sec. 1244. Sharing of classified United States ballistic missile defense information 

with the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1245. Imposition of sanctions with respect to the financial sector of Iran. 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

SEC. 1201. COMMANDERS’ EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012.—During fiscal year 

2012, from funds made available to the Department of Defense for 

operation and maintenance, not to exceed $400,000,000 may be used 

by the Secretary of Defense in such fiscal year to provide funds for 

the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

(b) QUARTERLY REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS.— (1) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 45 days after the 

end of each fiscal year quarter of fiscal year 2012, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
324 

a report regarding the source of funds and the allocation and 

use of funds during that quarter that were made available pursuant to the authority provided in this section or under any 

other provision of law for the purposes of the program under 

subsection (a). 

(2) FORM.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall 

be submitted, at a minimum, in a searchable electronic format 

that enables the congressional defense committees to sort the report by amount expended, location of each project, type of 

project, or any other field of data that is included in the report. 

(3) BRIEFINGS.—Not later than 15 days after the submission of each report required under paragraph (1), appropriate 

officials of the Department of Defense shall meet with the congressional defense committees to brief such committees on the 

matters contained in the report. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF GUIDANCE.— 

(1) INITIAL SUBMISSION.—Not later than 30 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the 

guidance issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the allocation of funds through the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

(2) MODIFICATIONS.—If the guidance in effect for the purpose stated in paragraph (1) is modified, the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the 

modification not later than 15 days after the date on which the 

Secretary makes the modification. 

(d) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—For purposes of exercising the authority provided by this section or any other provision of law making 

funding available for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan, the Secretary of Defense may waive any provision of law not contained in this section that would (but for the 

waiver) prohibit, restrict, limit, or otherwise constrain the exercise 

of that authority. 

(e) RESTRICTION ON AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS.—Funds made 

available under this section for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan may not be obligated or expended 

to carry out any project if the total amount of funds made available 

for the purpose of carrying out the project, including any ancillary 

or related elements of the project, exceeds $20,000,000. 

(f) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary of 

Defense may accept cash contributions from any person, foreign government, or international organization to provide funds for the 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan in fiscal year 2012. Funds received by the Secretary may be credited to 

the operation and maintenance account from which funds are made 

available to provide such funds, and may be used for such purpose 

until expended in addition to the funds specified in subsection (a). 

(g) NOTIFICATION.—Not less than 15 days before obligating or 

expending funds made available under this section for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan for a project 

in Afghanistan with a total anticipated cost of $5,000,000 or more, 

the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a written notice containing the following information: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
325 

(1) The location, nature, and purpose of the proposed 

project, including how the project is intended to advance the 

military campaign plan for Afghanistan. 

(2) The budget and implementation timeline for the proposed project, including any other funding under the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan that 

has been or is anticipated to be contributed to the completion 

of the project. 

(3) A plan for the sustainment of the proposed project, including any agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan, a department or agency of the United States Government 

other than the Department of Defense, or a third party contributor to finance the sustainment of the activities and maintenance of any equipment or facilities to be provided through the 

proposed project. 

(h) COMMANDERS’ EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM IN AFGHAN- ISTAN DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Commanders’ Emergency 

Response Program in Afghanistan’’ means the program that— 

(1) authorizes United States military commanders in Afghanistan to carry out small-scale projects designed to meet urgent humanitarian relief requirements or urgent reconstruction 

requirements within their areas of responsibility; and 

(2) provides an immediate and direct benefit to the people 

of Afghanistan. 

(i) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1202 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163; 119 Stat. 3455), as most recently amended by section 1212 of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4389), is hereby repealed. 

SEC. 1202. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO 

USE ACQUISITION AND CROSS-SERVICING AGREEMENTS 

TO LEND MILITARY EQUIPMENT FOR PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SURVIVABILITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the John 

Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 

(Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2412), as amended by section 

1203(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4386), is further 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Iraq or’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Iraq or’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘Iraq, Afghanistan, or’’ and inserting ‘‘Afghanistan or’’. 

(b) EXPIRATION.—Subsection (e) of such section, as amended by 

section 1204(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4623), 

is further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 

SEC. 1203. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT 

OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS TO COMBAT TERRORISM. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald 

W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 

(Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by 

section 1201 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
326 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4385), is further amended by striking ‘‘$45,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$50,000,000’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—Subsection (g) 

of such section, as amended by section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 

122 Stat. 364), is further amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘each fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘any fiscal 

year’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘pursuant to title XV of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘for that fiscal year’’. 

(c) EXTENSION.—Subsection (h) of such section, as most recently 

amended by section 1208(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4626), is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘2015’’. 

(d) BRIEFING AND REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 

of Representatives a briefing and a report that outlines future authorities the Secretary of Defense determines may be necessary to 

adequately conduct counterterrorism, unconventional warfare, and 

irregular warfare missions by special operations forces. 

SEC. 1204. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF FOREIGN 

MILITARY FORCES. 

(a) LIMITATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public 

Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by 

section 1207(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 

4389), is further amended in paragraph (5) by striking ‘‘fiscal 

year 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph 

(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and 

shall apply with respect to programs under subsection (a) of 

such section that begin on or after that date. 

(b) REPORT.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(f) REPORT.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the end of 

each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, transmit to the congressional 

committees specified in subsection (e)(3) a report on the implementation of this section for such fiscal year. 

‘‘(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

‘‘(A) For each program to build the capacity of a foreign country’s national military forces or maritime security 

forces to conduct counterterrorism operations that was carried out during the fiscal year covered by such report the 

following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
327 

‘‘(i) A description of the nature and the extent of 

the potential or actual terrorist threat that the program 

is intended to address. 

‘‘(ii) A description of the program, including the 

objectives of the program and the types of recipient nation units receiving assistance under the program. 

‘‘(iii) A description of the extent to which the program is implemented by United States Government 

personnel or contractors. 

‘‘(iv) A description of the participation, if any, of 

the foreign country in the formulation of the program. 

‘‘(v) A description of the arrangements, if any, for 

the sustainment of the program and of the source of 

funds to support sustainment of the program. 

‘‘(vi) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program in building the capacity of the foreign country to 

conduct counterterrorism operations during the fiscal 

year covered by such report, and a description of the 

metrics used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. 

‘‘(B) A description of the procedures and guidance for 

monitoring and evaluating the results of programs under 

this section.’’. 

(c) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (g) of 

such section, as most recently amended by section 1207(b) of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(124 Stat. 4389), is further amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2013’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 through 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2006 through 2013’’. 

SEC. 1205. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES. 

(a) NON-CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.— 

Subsection (a) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 13 110– 

417; 122 Stat. 4578) is amended by striking ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Navy’’ and inserting ‘‘Operation and Maintenance, Defensewide’’. 

(b) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘entities conducting activities relating to 

operational preparation of the environment, including’’ after 

‘‘include the provision of support to’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘or individuals’’ and inserting ‘‘or individuals,’’. 

(c) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON USE OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection 

(d) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘Upon’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) NOTICE.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days prior to’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the 

congressional defense committees within 72 hours of the use of 

such authority with respect to support of such activities’’ and 

inserting a period; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
328 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) CONTENT.—Each notification required under paragraph (1) shall include the following information: 

‘‘(A) The amount of funds made available for support 

of non-conventional assisted recovery activities. 

‘‘(B) A description of the non-conventional assisted recovery activities. 

‘‘(C) An identification of the type of recipients to receive 

support for non-conventional assisted recovery activities, including foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals, as appropriate.’’. 

(d) QUARTERLY REPORT.—Subsection (e) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(e) QUARTERLY REPORT.— ‘‘(1) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

relevant congressional defense committees a report on support 

for non-conventional assisted recovery activities under subsection (a) of this section. Such report shall be included as a 

part of the classified quarterly report on similar activities. 

‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The report shall, with respect to the covered period, include the following information: 

‘‘(A) The amount of funds obligated for support of nonconventional assisted recovery activities. 

‘‘(B) A description of the non-conventional assisted recovery activities. 

‘‘(C) An identification of the type of recipients to receive 

support for non-conventional assisted recovery activities, including foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals, as appropriate. 

‘‘(D) The total amount of funds obligated for support of 

non-conventional assisted recovery activities, including 

budget details. 

‘‘(E) The total amount of funds obligated for support of 

non-conventional assisted recovery activities in prior fiscal 

years. 

‘‘(F) The intended duration of support for support of 

non-conventional assisted recovery activities. 

‘‘(G) A description of support or training provided to 

the recipients of support. 

‘‘(H) A value assessment of the support provided. 

‘‘(3) COVERED PERIOD.—In this subsection, the term ‘covered 

period’ means the period with respect to which the classified 

quarterly report on similar activities applies.’’. 

(e) LIMITATION ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.—Subsection (f) of 

such section is amended by inserting ‘‘or support’’ after ‘‘conduct’’. 

(f) LIMITATION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES.—Subsection (g)(2) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘defense articles 

or defense services’’ and inserting ‘‘defense articles, defense services, 

or defense technologies’’. 

(g) PERIOD OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2013’’. 

SEC. 1206. SUPPORT OF FOREIGN FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO DISARM THE LORD’S RESISTANCE ARMY. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to the policy established by the 

Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda RecovVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00358 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
329 

ery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172; 124 Stat. 1209), the Secretary 

of Defense may, with the concurrence of Secretary of State, provide 

logistic support, supplies, and services for foreign forces participating in operations to mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by 

the Lord’s Resistance Army as follows: 

(1) The national military forces of Uganda. 

(2) The national military forces of any other country determined by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the 

Secretary of State, to be participating in such operations. 

(b) PARTICIPATION OF UNITED STATES PERSONNEL.—No United 

States Armed Forces personnel, United States civilian employees, or 

United States civilian contractor personnel may participate in combat operations in connection with the provision of support under 

subsection (a), except for the purpose of acting in self-defense or of 

rescuing any United States citizen (including any member of the 

United States Armed Forces, any United States civilian employee, 

or any United States civilian contractor). 

(c) FUNDING.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for each of fiscal years 

2012 and 2013 for operation and maintenance, not more than 

$35,000,000 may be utilized in each such fiscal year to provide 

support under subsection (a). 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.— 

Amounts available under this subsection for a fiscal year for 

support under the authority in subsection (a) may be used for 

support under that authority that begins in such fiscal year but 

ends in the next fiscal year. 

(d) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the 

authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of support that 

is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law. 

(2) ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense may 

not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide support to any 

foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such 

type of support under any other provision of law. 

(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not provide support under subsection (a) for 

the national military forces of a country determined to be eligible 

for such support under that subsection until the Secretary notifies 

the appropriate committees of Congress of the eligibility of the country for such support. 

(f) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON SUPPORT TO BE PROVIDED.—Not 

less than 15 days before the date on which funds are obligated to 

provide support under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice setting 

forth the following: 

(1) The type of support to be provided. 

(2) The national military forces to be supported. 

(3) The objectives of such support. 

(4) The estimated cost of such support. 

(5) The intended duration of such support. 

(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
330 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘logistic support, supplies, and services’’ has 

the meaning given that term in section 2350(1) of title 10, 

United States Code. 

(h) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided under this section 

may not be exercised after September 30, 2013. 

SEC. 1207. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established on the books of the 

Treasury of the United States an account to be known as the ‘‘Global Security Contingency Fund’’ (in this section referred to as the 

‘‘Fund’’). 

(b) AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law 

(other than the provisions of section 620A of the Foreign Assistance 

Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371) and the section 620J of such Act relating to limitations on assistance to security forces (22 U.S.C. 2378d)), 

amounts in the Fund shall be available to either the Secretary of 

State or the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to countries 

designated by the Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the 

Secretary of Defense, for purposes of this section, as follows: 

(1) To enhance the capabilities of a country’s national military forces, and other national security forces that conduct border and maritime security, internal defense, and counterterrorism operations, as well as the government agencies responsible for such forces, to— 

(A) conduct border and maritime security, internal defense, and counterterrorism operations; and 

(B) participate in or support military, stability, or 

peace support operations consistent with United States foreign policy and national security interests. 

(2) For the justice sector (including law enforcement and 

prisons), rule of law programs, and stabilization efforts in a 

country in cases in which the Secretary of State, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Defense, determines that conflict or instability in a country or region challenges the existing capability 

of civilian providers to deliver such assistance. 

(c) TYPES OF ASSISTANCE.— 

(1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—A program to provide the assistance under subsection (b)(1) may include the provision of 

equipment, supplies, and training. 

(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—A program to provide the assistance under subsection (b)(1) shall include elements that promote— 

(A) observance of and respect for human rights and 

fundamental freedoms; and 

(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority within the 

country concerned. 

(d) FORMULATION AND APPROVAL OF ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.— 

(1) SECURITY PROGRAMS.—The Secretary of State and the 

Secretary of Defense shall jointly formulate assistance programs 

under subsection (b)(1). Assistance programs to be carried out 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
331 

pursuant to subsection (b)(1) shall be approved by the Secretary 

of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, before 

implementation. 

(2) JUSTICE SECTOR AND STABILIZATION PROGRAMS.—The 

Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, 

shall formulate assistance programs under subsection (b)(2). 

Assistance programs to be carried out under the authority in 

subsection (b)(2) shall be approved by the Secretary of State, 

with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, before implementation. 

(e) RELATION TO OTHER AUTHORITIES.—The authority to provide assistance under this section is in addition to any other authority to provide assistance to foreign nations. The administrative authorities of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et 

seq.) shall be available to the Secretary of State with respect to 

funds available to carry out this section. 

(f) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.— 

(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS.—Funds authorized to 

be appropriated to the Department of Defense for operation and 

maintenance for Defense-wide activities may be transferred to 

the Fund by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 of this 

Act and successor provisions of law. Amounts transferred under 

this paragraph shall be merged with funds otherwise made 

available under this section and remain available until expended as provided in subsection (i) for the purposes specified 

in subsection (b). 

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of funds transferred to 

the Fund in any fiscal year from the Department of Defense 

may not exceed $200,000,000. 

(3) TRANSFERS TO OTHER ACCOUNTS.—Funds available to 

carry out assistance authorized by this section may be transferred to an agency or account determined most appropriate to 

facilitate the provision of assistance authorized by this section. 

(4) RELATION TO OTHER TRANSFER AUTHORITIES.—The 

transfer authorities in paragraphs (1) and (3) are in addition 

to any other transfer authority available to the Department of 

Defense. 

(g) ALLOCATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASSISTANCE.—The contribution of the Secretary of State to an activity under the authority 

in subsection (b) shall be not less than 20 percent of the total 

amount required for such activity. The contribution of the Secretary 

of Defense to such activity shall be not more than 80 percent of the 

total amount required. 

(h) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GIFTS.—The Secretary of State may 

use money, funds, property, and services accepted pursuant to the 

authority of section 635(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

U.S.C. 2395(d)) to fulfill the purposes of subsection (b). 

(i) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Amounts in the Fund shall remain available until September 30, 2015, except that amounts appropriated or transferred to the Fund before that date shall remain 

available for obligation and expenditure after that date for activities 

under programs commenced under subsection (b) before that date. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
332 

(j) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Amounts in the Fund may be 

used for necessary administrative expenses in connection with the 

provision of assistance under this section. 

(k) DETAIL OF PERSONNEL.—The head of an agency of the 

United States Government may detail personnel to the Department 

of State to carry out the purposes of this section, with or without 

reimbursement for all or part of the costs of salaries and other expenses associated with such personnel. 

(l) NOTICES TO CONGRESS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not less than 15 days before initiating an 

activity under a program of assistance under subsection (b), the 

Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the specified congressional committees a 

notification that includes the following: 

(A) A detailed justification for the program. 

(B) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and anticipated completion date for the activity. 

(C) A list of other security-related assistance or justice 

sector and stabilization assistance that the United States is 

currently providing the country concerned and that is related to or supported by the activity. 

(D) Such other information relating to the program or 

activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense 

considers appropriate. 

(2) EXERCISE OF TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—No transfer of 

funds into the Fund under subsection (f) or any other authority 

may occur until 15 days after the specified congressional committees are notified of the transfer. 

(3) GUIDANCE AND PROCESSES FOR EXERCISE OF AUTHOR- ITY.—The Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, shall notify the specified congressional committees 15 days after the date on which all necessary guidance 

has been issued and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are established and fully operational. 

(m) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than October 30, 2012, and 

annually thereafter until the expiration of the authority in subsection (b) pursuant to subsection (q), the Secretary of State and the 

Secretary of Defense jointly shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report on the following: 

(1) The obligation of funds from, and transfer of funds into, 

the Fund during the preceding fiscal year. 

(2) The status of programs and activities authorized under 

this section during the preceding fiscal year. 

(n) TRANSITIONAL AUTHORITIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide the types of assistance described in subsection (c), and assistance for minor military construction, during fiscal year 2012 as follows: 

(A) To enhance the capacity of the national military 

forces, security agencies serving a similar defense function, 

and border security forces of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Kenya 

to conduct counterterrorism operations against al-Qaeda, 

al-Qaeda affiliates, and al Shabaab. 

(B) To enhance the capacity of national military forces 

participating in the African Union Mission in Somalia to 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
333 

conduct counterterrorism operations described in subparagraph (A). 

(C) To enhance the ability of the Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter Terrorism Forces to conduct counter-terrorism operations against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and its affiliates. 

(2) LIMITATIONS.— (A) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The 

Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in this subsection to provide any type of assistance that is otherwise 

prohibited by any provision of law. 

(B) ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense 

may not use the authority in this subsection to provide a 

type of assistance to a foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any 

other provision of law. 

(C) YEMEN.—The authority specified in paragraph 

(1)(C), and the authority to provide assistance pursuant to 

section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 2456), 

may not be used for Yemen until 30 days after the date on 

which the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State 

jointly certify in writing to the specified congressional committees that the use of such authority is important to the 

national security interests of the United States. The certification shall include the following: 

(i) The reasons for the certification. 

(ii) A justification for the provision of assistance. 

(iii) An acknowledgment by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State that they have received 

assurance from the Government of Yemen that any assistance so provided will be utilized in manner consistent with subsection (c)(2). 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Not less than 15 days before 

funds are obligated to provide assistance under this subsection, 

the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a notice setting forth the following: 

(A) The type of assistance to be provided. 

(B) The national military forces to be supported. 

(C) The objectives of such assistance. 

(D) The estimated cost of such assistance. 

(E) The intended duration of such assistance. 

(4) TERMINATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Assistance authorized by this subsection may be provided until the earlier of— 

(i) the date on which the Secretary of State determines that all necessary guidance has been issued and 

processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are established and fully operational; or 

(ii) September 30, 2012. 

(B) COMPLETION OF ONGOING ACTIVITIES AFTER TERMINATION.—An assistance activity authorized by this subsection that begins before the date of termination provided 

in subparagraph (A) may be completed after that date, but 

only using funds available before that date. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
334 

(o) FUNDING.— 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2012.—The total amount available to the 

Department of Defense and the Department of State to provide 

assistance under this section during fiscal year 2012 may not 

exceed $350,000,000, of which— 

(A) $75,000,000 may be used for assistance authorized 

by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (n)(1); and 

(B) $75,000,000 may be used for assistance authorized 

by subparagraph (C) of subsection (n)(1). 

(2) FISCAL YEARS 2013 AND AFTER.—The total amount available to the Department of Defense and the Department of State 

to provide assistance under this section during a fiscal year 

after fiscal year 2012 may not exceed $300,000,000. 

(p) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the 

House of Representatives; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the 

Senate. 

(q) EXPIRATION.—The authority under this section may not be 

exercised after September 30, 2015. An activity under a program authorized by subsection (b) commenced before that date may be completed after that date, but only using funds available for fiscal years 

2012 through 2015. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and 

Pakistan 

SEC. 1211. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF LOGISTICAL SUPPORT 

FOR COALITION FORCES SUPPORTING OPERATIONS IN 

IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 

394), as amended by section 1218 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 

124 Stat. 4394), is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ 

each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’. 

(b) AMOUNT OF FUNDS AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘$400,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$450,000,000’’. 

SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER DEFENSE ARTICLES AND PROVIDE DEFENSE SERVICES TO 

THE MILITARY AND SECURITY FORCES OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of section 1234 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2532), as amended by section 1214 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4391), is further amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2012’’. 

(b) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section, as 

so amended, is further amended by striking ‘‘and every 90 days 

thereafter through March 31, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘every 90 days 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
335 

thereafter through March 31, 2012, and at the end of each calendar 

quarter, if any, thereafter through March 31, 2013, in which the authority in subsection (a) is implemented’’. 

SEC. 1213. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT 

PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 

181; 122 Stat. 393), as amended by section 1223 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 

123 Stat. 2519) and section 1213 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 

124 Stat. 4391), is further amended by striking ‘‘by section 1510 of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011’’ and inserting ‘‘for fiscal year 2012 for overseas contingency 

operations’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d)(1) of 

such section, as so amended, is further amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2010 or 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘$1,600,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$1,690,000,000’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section, 

as so amended, is further amended by inserting a comma after 

‘‘Budget’’. 

(d) EXTENSION OF NOTICE REQUIREMENT RELATING TO REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PAKISTAN.— 

Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 

1213(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011, is further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2013’’. 

SEC. 1214. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO ESTABLISH PERMANENT MILITARY INSTALLATIONS OR BASES IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) NO PERMANENT MILITARY BASES IN IRAQ.—None of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated 

or expended by the United States Government to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq. 

(b) NO PERMANENT MILITARY BASES IN AFGHANISTAN.—None of 

the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended by the United States Government to establish any 

military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. 

SEC. 1215. AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF 

THE OFFICE OF SECURITY COOPERATION IN IRAQ. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may support United 

States Government transition activities in Iraq by providing funds 

for the following: 

(1) Operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

(2) Operations and activities of security assistance teams in 

Iraq. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
336 

(b) TYPES OF SUPPORT.—The operations and activities for 

which the Secretary may provide funds under the authority in subsection (a) may include life support, transportation and personal security, and construction and renovation of facilities. 

(c) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total amount of funds provided under the authority in subsection (a) in fiscal year 2012 may 

not exceed $524,000,000. 

(d) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Funds for purposes of subsection (a) 

for fiscal year 2012 shall be derived from amounts available for 

that fiscal year for operation and maintenance for the Air Force. 

(e) COVERAGE OF COSTS OF OSCI IN CONNECTION WITH SALES

OF DEFENSE ARTICLES OR DEFENSE SERVICES TO IRAQ.—The President shall ensure that any letter of offer for the sale to Iraq of any 

defense articles or defense services issued after the date of the enactment of this Act includes, consistent with the provisions of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), charges sufficient to recover the costs of operations and activities of security assistance 

teams in Iraq in connection with such sale. 

(f) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation 

with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

The report shall include the following: 

(1) A description, in unclassified form (but with a classified 

annex if appropriate), of any capability gaps in the security 

forces of Iraq, including capability gaps relating to intelligence 

matters, protection of Iraq airspace, and logistics and maintenance. 

(2) A description of the manner in which the programs of 

the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq, in conjunction with 

other United States programs such as the Foreign Military Financing program, the Foreign Military Sales program, and 

joint training exercises, will address the capability gaps described in paragraph (1) if the Government of Iraq requests assistance in addressing such capability gaps. 

SEC. 1216. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR 

REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN. 

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392) is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for fiscal year 2011’’ and 

inserting ‘‘in each of fiscal years 2011 and 2012’’; and 

(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2011’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 

SEC. 1217. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND 

CARRY OUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) FUNDING.—Subsection (f) of section 1217 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393; 22 U.S.C. 7513 note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to paragraph (2), the’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
337 

(B) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 

year 2012’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may use not 

more than 85 percent of the amount specified in paragraph (1) 

to carry out the program authorized under subsection (a) until 

the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of 

State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees a 

plan for the allocation and use of funds under the program for 

fiscal year 2012.’’; and 

(4) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 

this subsection, by striking ‘‘until September 30, 2012.’’ and inserting ‘‘as follows: 

‘‘(A) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2011, until September 30, 2012. 

‘‘(B) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2012, until September 30, 2013.’’. 

(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Subsection (g) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘30 days’’ and inserting ‘‘15 days’’. 

SEC. 1218. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN REPORTS ON AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD SECURITY AND STABILITY IN

AFGHANISTAN.—Section 1230(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385), 

as most recently amended by section 1231 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 

111–383; 124 Stat. 4395), is further amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

(b) REPORT ON UNITED STATES PLAN FOR SUSTAINING AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES.—Section 1231(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 

390), as amended by section 1232 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (124 Stat. 4395), is further amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

SEC. 1219. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS FOR REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN. 

Not more than 50 percent of the amount available for fiscal 

year 2012 for reintegration activities in Afghanistan under the authority of section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 

4392), as amended by section 1216 of this Act, may be used to provide assistance to the Government of Afghanistan until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determines and certifies to Congress that women in Afghanistan are an 

integral part of the reconciliation process between the Government 

of Afghanistan and the Taliban. 

SEC. 1220. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF PAKISTAN COUNTERINSURGENCY FUND. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1224(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2521), as amended by section 1220 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
338 

124 Stat. 4395), is further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

2011’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON FUNDS SUBJECT TO REPORT AND UPDATES.— (1) LIMITATION ON FUNDS; REPORT REQUIRED.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts appropriated or 

transferred to the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund (hereafter in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘Fund’’) for fiscal 

year 2012, not more than 40 percent of such amounts may 

be obligated or expended until such time as the Secretary 

of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, 

submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report on— 

(i) a strategy to utilize the Fund and the metrics 

used to determine progress with respect to the Fund; 

and 

(ii) a strategy to enhance Pakistani efforts to 

counter improvised explosive devices (IEDs). 

(B) MATTER TO BE INCLUDED.—Such report shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(i) A discussion of United States strategic objectives in Pakistan. 

(ii) A listing of the terrorist or extremist organizations in Pakistan opposing United States goals in the 

region and against which the United States encourages 

Pakistan to take action. 

(iii) A discussion of the gaps in capabilities of Pakistani security units that hamper the ability of the Government of Pakistan to take action against the organizations listed in clause (ii). 

(iv) A discussion of how assistance provided utilizing the Fund will address the gaps in capabilities 

listed in clause (iii). 

(v) A discussion of other efforts undertaken by 

other United States Government departments and 

agencies to address the gaps in capabilities listed in 

clause (iii) or complementary activities of the Department of Defense and how those efforts are coordinated 

with the activities undertaken to utilize the Fund. 

(vi) A discussion of whether the Government of 

Pakistan is demonstrating a continuing commitment to 

and is making significant efforts toward the implementation of a strategy to counter IEDs, including efforts 

to attack IED networks, monitor known precursors 

used in IEDs, and develop a strict protocol for the 

manufacture of explosive materials, including calcium 

ammonium nitrate, and accessories and their supply to 

legitimate end users. 

(vii) Metrics that will be used to track progress in 

achieving the United States strategic objectives in Pakistan, to track progress of the Government of Pakistan 

in combating the organizations listed in clause (ii), to 

address the gaps in capabilities listed in clause (iii), 

and to track the progress of the Government of Pakistan in implementing the strategy to counter IEDs described in clause (vi). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
339 

(2) ANNUAL UPDATE REQUIRED.—For any fiscal year in 

which amounts in the Fund are requested to be made available 

to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Defense, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, at the same time that the 

President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of 

title 31, United States Code, an update of the report required 

under paragraph (1). 

(3) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) and 

the update required under paragraph (2) shall be submitted in 

unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex as necessary. 

(4) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; and 

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(c) QUARTERLY REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1224(f) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 

123 Stat. 2522) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Not later’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The Secretary of Defense, 

with the concurrence with the Secretary of State, shall include 

in the report required under paragraph (1) the following: 

‘‘(A) A discussion of progress in achieving United 

States strategic objectives in Pakistan during such fiscal 

quarter, utilizing metrics used to track progress in achieving such strategic objectives. 

‘‘(B) A discussion of progress made by programs supported from amounts in the Fund during such fiscal quarter.’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and apply with respect to each report required to be submitted 

under section 1224(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2011. 

SEC. 1221. BENCHMARKS TO EVALUATE THE PROGRESS BEING MADE 

TOWARD THE TRANSITION OF SECURITY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR AFGHANISTAN TO THE GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) OPTIONS FOR EXPANSION OF CAPACITY OF AFGHAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES.—The President shall, acting through the 

Secretary of Defense, establish and update as appropriate, and submit to Congress, options to accelerate the expansion of the capacity 

of Afghan National Security Forces with the goal of— 

(1) enabling the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, consistent with the Framework for Inteqal, to assume lead responsibility for security in all areas of Afghanistan, to maintain security in those areas, and to sustain the Afghan National Security Forces; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
340 

(2) achieving United States national security objectives to 

disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda and its extremist allies 

in Afghanistan, and preventing the establishment of safe havens for those entities; and 

(3) enabling the United States to move to an enduring partnership with the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, fully consistent with the Declaration by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan on an Enduring Partnership as issued at 

the Lisbon conference on November 20, 2010. 

(b) BENCHMARKS.—The President shall establish, and may update from time to time, a comprehensive set of benchmarks to evaluate progress being made toward meeting the goals set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a). 

(c) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—The President shall include the 

most current set of benchmarks established pursuant to subsection 

(b) with each report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan that is submitted to Congress under sections 1230 and 

1231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385, 390). 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 1231. REPORT ON COALITION SUPPORT FUND REIMBURSEMENTS 

TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR OPERATIONS 

CONDUCTED IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION ENDURING 

FREEDOM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

of the House of Representatives assessing the effectiveness of the Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of Pakistan for operations conducted in support of Operation Enduring 

Freedom. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 

include the following elements: 

(1) A description of the types of reimbursements requested 

by the Government of Pakistan. 

(2) The total amount reimbursed to the Government of 

Pakistan since the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom, 

in the aggregate and by fiscal year. 

(3) The percentage and types of reimbursement requests 

made by the Government of Pakistan for which the United 

States Government has deferred or not provided payment. 

(4) An assessment of the outcomes of operations conducted 

by the Government of Pakistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom for which reimbursement was requested during the 

24-month period ending on the date of the enactment of this 

Act, and of the impact of those operations in containing the 

ability of terrorist organizations to threaten the stability of Afghanistan and Pakistan and to impede the operations of the 

United States in Afghanistan. 

(5) Recommendations, if any, relative to potential alternatives to or termination of reimbursements from the Coalition 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
341 

Support Fund to the Government of Pakistan taking into account the transition plan for Afghanistan. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 

SEC. 1232. REVIEW AND REPORT ON IRAN’S AND CHINA’S CONVENTIONAL AND ANTI-ACCESS CAPABILITIES. 

(a) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall conduct an independent review of the following: 

(1) Any gaps between Iran’s conventional and anti-access 

capabilities and United States’ capabilities to overcome them. 

(2) Any gaps between China’s anti-access capabilities and 

United States’ capabilities to overcome them. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2013, the Comptroller 

General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the review conducted under subsection (a). 

(c) ADDITIONAL TO OTHER REPORTS, ETC.—The review conducted under subsection (a) and the report required under subsection (b) are in addition to the report required under section 1238 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4402) and the strategy 

and briefings required under section 1243 of such Act (Public Law 

111–383; 124 Stat. 4405). 

(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘anti-access’’ has the 

meaning given the term in section 1238(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 

111–383; 124 Stat. 4403). 

SEC. 1233. REPORT ON ENERGY SECURITY OF THE NATO ALLIANCE. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 

(1) Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Strategic Concept declares 

that ‘‘[a]ll countries are increasingly reliant on the vital communication, transport and transit routes on which international 

trade, energy security and prosperity depend. They require 

greater international efforts to ensure their resilience against attack or disruption. Some NATO countries will become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for their energy 

needs. As a larger share of world consumption is transported 

across the globe, energy supplies are increasingly exposed to disruption.’’. 

(2) The new NATO Strategic Concept further declares that, 

‘‘to deter and defend against any threat to the safety and security of our populations’’, the NATO alliance will, ‘‘develop the 

capacity to contribute to energy security, including protection of 

critical energy infrastructure and transit areas and lines, cooperation with partners, and consultations among Allies on the 

basis of strategic assessments and contingency planning.’’. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed report on efforts by the Department of Defense, including 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
342 

within NATO, to address the energy security of the NATO alliance. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution 

network. 

(B) A description of the threats to the energy security 

of the NATO alliance, including from each of following: 

(i) Shortages of supply of oil or natural gas or 

spikes in prices of oil or natural gas. 

(ii) Disruptions within the energy distribution infrastructure or transit lines supplying NATO member 

countries. 

(C) A description of options for responding to or mitigating the energy security risks to NATO member countries 

and to United States Armed Forces based in Europe posed 

by the threats described under subparagraph (B). 

(D) Recommendations, if any, for actions to be undertaken to improve the energy security of the NATO alliance. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (b) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 

(d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1234. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT 

ON THE NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 31, 2012, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the National Guard State Partnership Program. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A summary of the sources of funds for the State Partnership Program over the last five years. 

(2) An analysis of the types and frequency of activities performed by participants in the State Partnership Program. 

(3) A description of the objectives of the State Partnership 

Program and the manner in which objectives under the program are established and coordinated with the Office of the 

Secretary of Defense, the geographic combatant commands, 

United States Country Teams, and other departments and 

agencies of the United States Government. 

(4) A description of the manner in which the Department 

of Defense selects and designates particular State and foreign 

country partnerships under the State Partnership Program. 

(5) A description of the manner in which the Department 

measures the effectiveness of the activities under the State Partnership Program in meeting the objectives of the program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
343 

(6) An assessment by the Comptroller General of the United 

States of the effectiveness of the activities under the State Partnership Program in meeting the objectives of the program. 

SEC. 1235. MAN-PORTABLE AIR-DEFENSE SYSTEMS ORIGINATING FROM 

LIBYA. 

(a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—Pursuant to section 11 of the Department of State Authorities Act of 2006 (22 U.S.C. 2349bb–6), the 

following is the policy of the United States: 

(1) To reduce and mitigate, to the greatest extent feasible, 

the threat posed to United States citizens and citizens of allies 

of the United States by man-portable air-defense systems 

(MANPADS) that were in Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(2) To seek the cooperation of, and to assist, the Government of Libya and governments of neighboring countries and 

other countries (as determined by the President) to secure, remove, or eliminate stocks of man-portable air-defense systems 

described in paragraph (1) that pose a threat to United States 

citizens and citizens of allies of the United States. 

(3) To pursue, as a matter of priority, an agreement with 

the Government of Libya and governments of neighboring countries and other countries (as determined by the Secretary of 

State) to formalize cooperation with the United States to limit 

the availability, transfer, and proliferation of man-portable airdefense systems described in paragraph (1). 

(b) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT ON MANPADS IN

LIBYA.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of National Intelligence 

shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment by the intelligence community that accounts for the 

disposition of, and the threat to United States citizens and citizens of allies of the United States posed by man-portable airdefense systems that were in Libya as of March 19, 2011. The 

assessment shall be submitted as soon as practicable, but not 

later than the end of the 45-day period beginning on the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment submitted under this subsection shall include the following: 

(A) An estimate of the number of man-portable air-defense systems that were in Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(B) An estimate of the number of man-portable air-defense systems in Libya as of March 19, 2011, that are currently in the secure custody of the Government of Libya, the 

United States, an ally of the United States, a member of 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), or the 

United Nations. 

(C) An estimate of the number of man-portable air-defense systems in Libya as of March 19, 2011, that were destroyed, disabled, or otherwise rendered unusable during 

Operation Unified Protector and since the end of Operation 

Unified Protector. 

(D) An assessment of the number of man-portable airdefense systems that is the difference between the number 

of man-portable air-defense systems in Libya as of March 

19, 2011, and the cumulative number of man-portable airdefense systems accounted for under subparagraphs (B) 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
344 

and (C), and the current disposition and locations of such 

man-portable air-defense systems. 

(E) An assessment of the number of man-portable airdefense systems that are currently in the custody of militias 

in Libya. 

(F) A list of any organizations designated as terrorist 

organizations by the Department of State, or affiliate organizations or members of such organizations, that are 

known or believed to have custody of any man-portable airdefense systems that were in the custody of the Government 

of Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(G) An assessment of the threat posed to United States 

citizens and citizens of allies of the United States from unsecured man-portable air-defense systems (as defined in 

section 11 of the Department of State Authorities Act of 

2006) originating from Libya. 

(H) An assessment of the effect of the proliferation of 

man-portable air-defense systems that were in Libya as of 

March 19, 2011, on the price and availability of man-portable air-defense systems that are on the global arms market. 

(3) NOTICE REGARDING DELAY IN SUBMITTAL.—If, before the 

end of the 45-day period specified in paragraph (1), the Director 

determines that the assessment required by that paragraph cannot be submitted by the end of that period as required by that 

paragraph, the Director shall (before the end of that period) 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth— 

(A) the reasons why the assessment cannot be submitted by the end of that period; and 

(B) an estimated date for the submittal of the assessment. 

(c) COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY ON THREAT OF MANPADS ORIG- INATING FROM LIBYA.— 

(1) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The President shall develop and 

implement, and from time to time update, a comprehensive 

strategy, pursuant to section 11 of the Department of State Authorities Act of 2006, to reduce and mitigate the threat posed 

to United States citizens and citizens of allies of the United 

States from man-portable air-defense systems that were in 

Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(2) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days after the assessment required by subsection (b) is submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress, the President shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the strategy required by paragraph (1). 

(B) ELEMENTS.—The report required by this paragraph 

shall include the following: 

(i) An assessment of the effectiveness of efforts undertaken to date by the United States, Libya, Mauritania, Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Mali, Morocco, Niger, 

Chad, the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization, and any other country or entity (as determined by the President) to reduce the threat posed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
345 

to United States citizens and citizens of allies of the 

United States from man-portable air-defense systems 

that were in Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(ii) A timeline for future efforts by the United 

States, Libya, and neighboring countries to— 

(I) secure, remove, or disable any man-portable 

air-defense systems that remain in Libya; 

(II) counter proliferation of man-portable airdefense systems originating from Libya that are in 

the region; and 

(III) disrupt the ability of terrorists, non-state 

actors, and state sponsors of terrorism to acquire 

such man-portable air-defense systems. 

(iii) A description of any additional funding required to address the threat of man-portable air-defense systems originating from Libya. 

(iv) A description of technologies currently available to reduce the susceptibility and vulnerability of civilian aircraft to man-portable air-defense systems, including an assessment of the feasibility of using aircraft-based anti-missile systems to protect United 

States passenger jets. 

(v) Recommendations for the most effective policy 

measures that can be taken to reduce and mitigate the 

threat posed to United States citizens and citizens of 

allies of the United States from man-portable air-defense systems that were in Libya as of March 19, 2011. 

(vi) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the President considers appropriate to implement the strategy required by paragraph 

(1). 

(C) FORM.—The report required by this paragraph 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 

classified annex. 

(d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1236. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than November 1, 2012, the Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the current and future military power of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (in 

this section referred to as ‘‘North Korea’’). The report shall address 

the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the North Korean military, the tenets and probable development of North Korean security strategy and military strategy, 

and military organizations and operational concepts, through the 

next 20 years. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
346 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—A report required under subsection (a) shall include at least the following elements: 

(1) An assessment of the security situation on the Korean 

peninsula. 

(2) The goals and factors shaping North Korean security 

strategy and military strategy. 

(3) Trends in North Korean security and military behavior 

that would be designed to achieve, or that are inconsistent with, 

the goals described in paragraph (2). 

(4) An assessment of North Korea’s regional security objectives, including those that would affect South Korea, Japan, the 

People’s Republic of China, and Russia. 

(5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and capabilities of North Korean strategic, special operations, land, sea, 

and air forces. 

(6) Developments in North Korean military doctrine and 

training. 

(7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of North 

Korea, as either a supplier or a consumer of materials or technologies relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass 

destruction or missile systems. 

(8) Other military and security developments involving 

North Korea that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to 

United States national security. 

(c) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1237. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NON-STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND EXTENDED DETERRENCE POLICY. 

(a) REGARDING NON-STRATEGIC NUCLEAR WEAPONS.—It is the 

sense of Congress that— 

(1) if the United States pursues arms control negotiations 

with the Russian Federation, such negotiations should be aimed 

at the reduction of Russian deployed and non-deployed nonstrategic nuclear weapons and increased transparency of such 

weapons; and 

(2) for purposes of such negotiations— 

(A) non-strategic nuclear weapons should be considered 

when weighing the balance of the nuclear forces of the 

United States and Russia; and 

(B) geographical relocation and consolidated or centralized storage of non-strategic nuclear weapons by Russia 

should not be considered a reduction or elimination of such 

weapons. 

(b) REGARDING EXTENDED DETERRENCE COMMITMENT TO EUROPE.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the commitment of the United States to extended deterrence in Europe and the nuclear alliance of the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization (NATO) is an important component of ensuring and linking the national security of the United States 

and its European allies; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
347 

(2) nuclear forces of the United States are a key component 

of the NATO nuclear alliance; and 

(3) the presence of United States nuclear weapons in Europe—combined with NATO’s unique nuclear sharing arrangements under which non-nuclear members participate in nuclear 

planning and possess specially configured aircraft capable of 

delivering nuclear weapons—provides reassurance to NATO allies who feel exposed to regional threats. 

SEC. 1238. ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

(a) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Subsection (b) of section 1202 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 

(Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1246(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2544), is further amended— 

(1) in paragraph (7)— 

(A) by adding at the end before the period the following: ‘‘or otherwise undermine the Department of Defense’s capability to conduct information assurance’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Such analyses 

shall include an assessment of the damage inflicted on the 

Department of Defense by reason thereof.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (9), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘Such analyses shall include an assessment of the nature of 

China’s cyber activities directed against the Department of Defense and an assessment of the damage inflicted on the Department of Defense by reason thereof. Such cyber activities shall 

include activities originating or suspected of originating from 

China and shall include government and non-government activities believed to be sanctioned or supported by the Government of China.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2000, as so amended, on or after that date. 

SEC. 1239. REPORT ON EXPANSION OF PARTICIPATION IN EURO-NATO 

JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING PROGRAM. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the desirability and feasibility of expanding 

participation in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) 

program to include additional countries. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the ENJJPT program as it relates to 

United States national security. 

(2) An assessment of the current participation in the 

ENJJPT program and whether it fully meets the needs of the 

program and United States and NATO objectives. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
348 

(3) An analysis of whether participation of additional countries in the ENJJPT program would benefit the program and 

United States national security. 

(4) A recommendation of additional countries, if any, that 

could participate in the ENJJPT program, including NATO 

member nations not currently participating in the program, 

major non-NATO allies, Partnership for Peace nations, and 

other countries. 

(5) The restrictions or limitations that currently prevent additional countries from participating in the ENJJPT program. 

(6) An assessment of the costs and benefits to the United 

States, including potential benefits to United States security interests of improved training opportunities for other countries, of 

a United States-sponsored scholarship program to assist certain 

countries to meet the cost-sharing obligations of participation in 

the ENJJPT program, and whether authorities currently exist 

to institute such a scholarship program. 

SEC. 1240. REPORT ON RUSSIAN NUCLEAR FORCES. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of 

Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

on the nuclear forces of the Russian Federation and the New 

START Treaty. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under section (a) shall include an assessment of the following: 

(1) The assessed number of nuclear forces by category of nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles relative to New START 

levels by 2017 and by 2022, including potential shifts of such 

numbers during such periods. 

(2) Options with respect to the size and composition of Russian nuclear forces that Russia is considering, including decreases below the New START levels and plans for maintaining 

New START levels, including options related to developing and 

deploying a new heavy intercontinental ballistic missile and 

multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle capability. 

(3) Factors that are likely to influence the number and composition of Russian nuclear forces. 

(4) Effects of shifts in the number and composition of Russian nuclear forces on strategic stability. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include classified annex. 

(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; 

(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

the Senate; and 

(C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the Senate. 

(2) NEW START TREATY.—The term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ 

means the Treaty between the United States of America and the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
349 

Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and 

Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010. 

SEC. 1241. REPORT ON PROGRESS OF THE AFRICAN UNION IN 

OPERATIONALIZING THE AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives a report on the progress of the African Union in operationalizing the African Standby Force. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the existing personnel strengths and 

capabilities of each of the five regional brigades of the African 

Standby Force and their brigade-level headquarters. 

(2) An assessment of the specific capacity-building needs of 

the African Standby Force, including with respect to supply 

management, information management, strategic planning, and 

other critical components. 

(3) A description of the functionality of the supply depots of 

each brigade referred to in paragraph (1), and current information on existing stocks of each such brigade. 

(4) An assessment of the capacity of the African Union to 

manage the African Standby Force. 

(5) An assessment of inter-organizational coordination on 

assistance to the African Union and the African Standby Force 

between multilateral donors, including the United Nations, the 

European Union, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 

(6) An assessment of the capacity of the African Union to 

absorb additional international assistance toward the development of a fully functional African Standby Force. 

SEC. 1242. DEFENSE COOPERATION WITH REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA. 

(a) PLAN FOR NORMALIZATION.—Not later than 90 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, 

with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, develop and submit 

to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

of the House of Representatives a plan for the normalization of 

United States defense cooperation with the Republic of Georgia, including the sale of defensive arms. 

(b) OBJECTIVES.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall 

address the following objectives: 

(1) To establish a normalized defense cooperation relationship between the United States and the Republic of Georgia, 

taking into consideration the progress of the Government of the 

Republic of Georgia on democratic and economic reforms and 

the capacity of the Georgian armed forces. 

(2) To support the Government of the Republic of Georgia 

in providing for the defense of its government, people, and sovereign territory, consistent with the continuing commitment of 

the Government of the Republic of Georgia to its non-use-offorce pledge and consistent with Article 51 of the Charter of the 

United Nations. 

(3) To provide for the sale by the United States of defense 

articles and services in support of the efforts of the Government 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
350 

of the Republic of Georgia to provide for its own self-defense 

consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2). 

(4) To continue to enhance the ability of the Government of 

the Republic of Georgia to participate in coalition operations 

and meet NATO partnership goals. 

(5) To encourage NATO member and candidate countries to 

restore and enhance their sales of defensive articles and services 

to the Republic of Georgia as part of a broader NATO effort to 

deepen its defense relationship and cooperation with the Republic of Georgia. 

(6) To ensure maximum transparency in the United StatesGeorgia defense relationship. 

(c) INCLUDED INFORMATION.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall include the following information: 

(1) A needs-based assessment, or an update to an existing 

needs-based assessment, of the defense requirements of the Republic of Georgia, which shall be prepared by the Department 

of Defense. 

(2) A description of each of the letters of offer and acceptance by the Government of the Republic of Georgia for purchase 

of defense articles and services during the two-year period ending on the date of the report. 

(3) A summary of the defense needs asserted by the Government of the Republic of Georgia as justification for its requests 

for defensive arms purchases. 

(4) A description of the action taken on any defensive arms 

sale request by the Government of the Republic of Georgia and 

an explanation for such action. 

(d) FORM.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 

SEC. 1243. PROHIBITION ON PROCUREMENTS FROM COMMUNIST CHINESE MILITARY COMPANIES. 

(a) WAIVER AUTHORIZED.—Subsection (c) of section 1211 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public 

Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3461; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended to 

read as follows: 

‘‘(c) WAIVER AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may waive 

the prohibition in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that 

such a waiver is necessary for national security purposes and the 

Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

described in subsection (d) not less than 15 days before issuing the 

waiver under this subsection.’’. 

(b) REPORT.—Such section is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(d) REPORT.—The report referred to in subsection (c) is a report 

that identifies the specific reasons for the waiver issued under subsection (c) and includes recommendations as to what actions may 

be taken to develop alternative sourcing capabilities in the future.’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with 

respect to contracts and subcontracts of the Department of Defense 

entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
351 

SEC. 1244. SHARING OF CLASSIFIED UNITED STATES BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) NOTIFICATION.—No classified United States ballistic missile 

defense information may be made available to the Russian Federation unless, 60 days prior to any instance in which the United 

States Government plans to provide such information to the Russian Federation, the President provides notification thereof to the 

appropriate congressional committees. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF NOTIFICATION.—Each notification provided 

pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A detailed description of the classified United States 

ballistic missile defense information to be provided. 

(2) An explanation of the national security interest in providing the information to the Russian Federation and any provisions for reciprocal sharing by the Russian Federation with 

the United States on its defensive systems. 

(3) A certification that providing the information is consistent with United States national disclosure policy as of the 

date of enactment of this Act and that the decision to provide 

the information was made pursuant to a national disclosure 

policy review. 

(4) If applicable, a detailed explanation of whether any exceptions to national disclosure policy were required in order to 

provide the information to the Russian Federation and why 

such exceptions were required. 

(5) A certification that adequate measures are in place to 

protect the information from unauthorized disclosure. The certification shall include a description of the manner in which the 

information will be protected from unauthorized sharing or 

transfer to third parties as well as an analysis of the risks to 

the capabilities of the United States ballistic missile defense 

system if the information is shared or transferred to an unauthorized third party. 

(c) FORM.—Each notification provided pursuant to subsection 

(a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—For 

the purposes of this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional 

committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(e) CLASSIFIED UNITED STATES BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN- FORMATION DEFINED.—For the purposes of this section, the term 

‘‘classified United States ballistic missile defense information’’ 

means information related to United States ballistic missile defenses that is classified as of, or after, the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

SEC. 1245. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE FINANCIAL SECTOR OF IRAN. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 

(1) On November 21, 2011, the Secretary of the Treasury 

issued a finding under section 5318A of title 31, United States 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
352 

Code, that identified Iran as a jurisdiction of primary money 

laundering concern. 

(2) In that finding, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of the Treasury wrote, ‘‘The Central 

Bank of Iran, which regulates Iranian banks, has assisted designated Iranian banks by transferring billions of dollars to 

these banks in 2011. In mid-2011, the CBI transferred several 

billion dollars to designated banks, including Saderat, Mellat, 

EDBI and Melli, through a variety of payment schemes. In 

making these transfers, the CBI attempted to evade sanctions by 

minimizing the direct involvement of large international banks 

with both CBI and designated Iranian banks.’’. 

(3) On November 22, 2011, the Under Secretary of the 

Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, David 

Cohen, wrote, ‘‘Treasury is calling out the entire Iranian banking sector, including the Central Bank of Iran, as posing terrorist financing, proliferation financing, and money laundering 

risks for the global financial system.’’. 

(b) DESIGNATION OF FINANCIAL SECTOR OF IRAN AS OF PRIMARY

MONEY LAUNDERING CONCERN.—The financial sector of Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran, is designated as a primary money 

laundering concern for purposes of section 5318A of title 31, United 

States Code, because of the threat to government and financial institutions resulting from the illicit activities of the Government of Iran, 

including its pursuit of nuclear weapons, support for international 

terrorism, and efforts to deceive responsible financial institutions 

and evade sanctions. 

(c) FREEZING OF ASSETS OF IRANIAN FINANCIAL INSTITU- TIONS.—The President shall, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of an 

Iranian financial institution if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are 

or come within the possession or control of a United States person. 

(d) IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE CENTRAL

BANK OF IRAN AND OTHER IRANIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as specifically provided in this 

subsection, beginning on the date that is 60 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the President— 

(A) shall prohibit the opening, and prohibit or impose 

strict conditions on the maintaining, in the United States 

of a correspondent account or a payable-through account by 

a foreign financial institution that the President determines 

has knowingly conducted or facilitated any significant financial transaction with the Central Bank of Iran or another Iranian financial institution designated by the Secretary of the Treasury for the imposition of sanctions pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(B) may impose sanctions pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) 

with respect to the Central Bank of Iran. 

(2) EXCEPTION FOR SALES OF FOOD, MEDICINE, AND MEDICAL

DEVICES.—The President may not impose sanctions under paragraph (1) with respect to any person for conducting or faciliVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00382 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
353 

tating a transaction for the sale of food, medicine, or medical 

devices to Iran. 

(3) APPLICABILITY OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO FOREIGN

CENTRAL BANKS.—Except as provided in paragraph (4), sanctions imposed under paragraph (1)(A) shall apply with respect 

to a foreign financial institution owned or controlled by the government of a foreign country, including a central bank of a foreign country, only insofar as it engages in a financial transaction for the sale or purchase of petroleum or petroleum products to or from Iran conducted or facilitated on or after that 

date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(4) APPLICABILITY OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO PETROLEUM TRANSACTIONS.— 

(A) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 60 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 60 days 

thereafter, the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of the 

Treasury, the Secretary of State, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to Congress a report on the 

availability and price of petroleum and petroleum products 

produced in countries other than Iran in the 60-day period 

preceding the submission of the report. 

(B) DETERMINATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 

180 days thereafter, the President shall make a determination, based on the reports required by subparagraph (A), of 

whether the price and supply of petroleum and petroleum 

products produced in countries other than Iran is sufficient 

to permit purchasers of petroleum and petroleum products 

from Iran to reduce significantly in volume their purchases 

from Iran. 

(C) APPLICATION OF SANCTIONS.—Except as provided in 

subparagraph (D), sanctions imposed under paragraph 

(1)(A) shall apply with respect to a financial transaction 

conducted or facilitated by a foreign financial institution 

on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act for the purchase of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran if the President determines pursuant to subparagraph (B) that there is a sufficient supply 

of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other 

than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume 

of petroleum and petroleum products purchased from Iran 

by or through foreign financial institutions. 

(D) EXCEPTION.—Sanctions imposed pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a foreign financial 

institution if the President determines and reports to Congress, not later than 90 days after the date on which the 

President makes the determination required by subparagraph (B), and every 180 days thereafter, that the country 

with primary jurisdiction over the foreign financial institution has significantly reduced its volume of crude oil purchases from Iran during the period beginning on the date 

on which the President submitted the last report with respect to the country under this subparagraph. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
354 

(5) WAIVER.—The President may waive the imposition of 

sanctions under paragraph (1) for a period of not more than 

120 days, and may renew that waiver for additional periods of 

not more than 120 days, if the President— 

(A) determines that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and 

(B) submits to Congress a report— 

(i) providing a justification for the waiver; and 

(ii) that includes any concrete cooperation the 

President has received or expects to receive as a result 

of the waiver. 

(e) MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY INITIATIVE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall— 

(A) carry out an initiative of multilateral diplomacy to 

persuade countries purchasing oil from Iran— 

(i) to limit the use by Iran of revenue from purchases of oil to purchases of non-luxury consumers 

goods from the country purchasing the oil; and 

(ii) to prohibit purchases by Iran of— 

(I) military or dual-use technology, including 

items— 

(aa) in the Annex to the Missile Technology Control Regime Guidelines; 

(bb) in the Annex on Chemicals to the 

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of 

Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, 

done at Paris January 13, 1993, and entered 

into force April 29, 1997 (commonly known as 

the ‘‘Chemical Weapons Convention’’); 

(cc) in Part 1 or 2 of the Nuclear Suppliers Group Guidelines; or 

(dd) on a control list of the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies; or 

(II) any other item that could contribute to 

Iran’s conventional, nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons program; and 

(B) conduct outreach to petroleum-producing countries 

to encourage those countries to increase their output of 

crude oil to ensure there is a sufficient supply of crude oil 

from countries other than Iran and to minimize any impact 

on the price of oil resulting from the imposition of sanctions 

under this section. 

(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, 

the President shall submit to Congress a report on the efforts 

of the President to carry out the initiative described in paragraph (1)(A) and conduct the outreach described in paragraph 

(1)(B) and the results of those efforts. 

(f) FORM OF REPORTS.—Each report submitted under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a 

classified annex. 

(g) IMPLEMENTATION; PENALTIES.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
355 

(1) IMPLEMENTATION.—The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 

1704) to carry out this section. 

(2) PENALTIES.—The penalties provided for in subsections 

(b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) shall apply to a person that 

violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a 

violation of this section or regulations prescribed under this section to the same extent that such penalties apply to a person 

that commits an unlawful act described in section 206(a) of 

that Act. 

(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) ACCOUNT; CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNT; PAYABLETHROUGH ACCOUNT.—The terms ‘‘account’’, ‘‘correspondent account’’, and ‘‘payable-through account’’ have the meanings given 

those terms in section 5318A of title 31, United States Code. 

(2) FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘foreign financial institution’’ has the meaning of that term as determined 

by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 104(i) of 

the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (22 U.S.C. 8513(i)). 

(3) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘‘United States person’’ means— 

(A) a natural person who is a citizen or resident of the 

United States or a national of the United States (as defined 

in section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

U.S.C. 1101(a))); and 

(B) an entity that is organized under the laws of the 

United States or a jurisdiction within the United States. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for cooperative biological engagement 

program. 

Sec. 1304. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 

countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 

SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

PROGRAMS AND FUNDS. 

(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this 

Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). 

(b) FISCAL YEAR 2012 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS

DEFINED.—As used in this title, the term ‘‘fiscal year 2012 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds’’ means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made 

available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative 

Threat Reduction programs. 

(c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 

the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat ReVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00385 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
356 

duction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 

2012, 2013, and 2014. 

SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS. 

(a) FUNDING FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—Of the $508,219,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal 

year 2012 in section 301 and made available by the funding table 

in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: 

(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $63,221,000. 

(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $9,804,000. 

(3) For global nuclear security, $121,143,000. 

(4) For cooperative biological engagement, $259,470,000. 

(5) For proliferation prevention, $28,080,000. 

(6) For threat reduction engagement, $2,500,000. 

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $24,001,000. 

(b) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR

OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2012 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than 

a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 

15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated 

or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. 

Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing 

the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2012 Cooperative Threat 

Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any 

other provision of law. 

(c) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO VARY INDIVIDUAL AMOUNTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in 

which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary 

to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate 

amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2012 for a purpose listed 

in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the 

specific amount authorized for that purpose. 

(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds 

for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 

(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose 

may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) 

only after— 

(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of 

the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of 

the justification for doing so; and 

(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification. 

SEC. 1303. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR COOPERATIVE BIOLOGICAL ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

section 1302(a)(4) or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 

for cooperative biological engagement, not more than 80 percent 

may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary 

of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees the 

following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
357 

(1) A detailed analysis of the effect of the cooperative biological engagement program. 

(2) Either— 

(A) written certification that the efforts of the cooperative biological engagement program— 

(i) result in changed practices or are otherwise effective; and 

(ii) lead to threat reduction; or 

(B) a detailed list of policy and program recommendations considered necessary by the Secretary to modify, expand, or curtail the cooperative biological engagement program in order to achieve the objectives described by subparagraph (A). 

(b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(1) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 

SEC. 1304. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 

CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF 

THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 

Not more than $500,000 of the fiscal year 2012 Cooperative 

Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended to establish 

a center of excellence in a country that is not a state of the former 

Soviet Union until the date that is 15 days after the date on which 

the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: 

(1) An identification of the country in which the center will 

be located. 

(2) A description of the purpose for which the center will be 

established. 

(3) The agreement under which the center will operate. 

(4) A funding plan for the center, including— 

(A) the amount of funds to be provided by the government of the country in which the center will be located; and 

(B) the percentage of the total cost of establishing and 

operating the center the funds described in subparagraph 

(A) will cover. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. 

Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals 

from the National Defense Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
358 

Sec. 1422. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working 

capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year 2012 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

(b) AUTHORIZED PROCUREMENT.—Funds appropriated pursuant 

to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) may be used 

to purchase an offshore petroleum distribution system, and the associated tender for that system, that are under charter by the Military 

Sealift Command as of January 1, 2011. 

SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal 

year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical 

Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

(b) USE.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— 

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 

in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 

Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and 

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 

United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 

SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the 

health of eligible beneficiaries. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
359 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

SEC. 1411. AUTHORIZED USES OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE 

FUNDS. 

(a) OBLIGATION OF STOCKPILE FUNDS.—During fiscal year 

2012, the National Defense Stockpile Manager may obligate up to 

$50,107,320 of the funds in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund established under subsection (a) of section 9 of the 

Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h) 

for the authorized uses of such funds under subsection (b)(2) of such 

section, including the disposal of hazardous materials that are environmentally sensitive. 

(b) ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS.—The National Defense Stockpile 

Manager may obligate amounts in excess of the amount specified in 

subsection (a) if the National Defense Stockpile Manager notifies 

Congress that extraordinary or emergency conditions necessitate the 

additional obligations. The National Defense Stockpile Manager 

may make the additional obligations described in the notification 

after the end of the 45-day period beginning on the date on which 

Congress receives the notification. 

(c) LIMITATIONS.—The authorities provided by this section shall 

be subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations 

Acts. 

SEC. 1412. REVISION TO REQUIRED RECEIPT OBJECTIVES FOR PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DISPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL 

DEFENSE STOCKPILE. 

Section 3402(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most 

recently amended by section 1412 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 

124 Stat. 4412), is further amended by striking ‘‘$730,000,000 by 

the end of fiscal year 2013’’ in paragraph (5) and inserting 

‘‘$830,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2016’’. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

SEC. 1421. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 

RETIREMENT HOME. 

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum 

of $67,700,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement 

Home. 

SEC. 1422. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN 

JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $135,600,000 

may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection 

(a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
360 

as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose 

of such a transfer. 

(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For purposes of subsection 

(b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the 

North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 

4500). 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Defense Health Program. 

Sec. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Inspector General. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

Sec. 1532. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain facilities projects in Iraq. 

Sec. 1533. Availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1534. One-year extension of project authority and related requirements of Task 

Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1535. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Sec. 1536. Report on lessons learned from Department of Defense participation on 

interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and 

Iraq. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for 

the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 to provide additional 

funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the 

Armed Forces. 

SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified 

in the funding table in section 4102. 

SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, developVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00390 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
361 

ment, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202. 

SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 

SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table 

in section 4402. 

SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working 

capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1507. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1508. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1509. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in 

addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act. 

SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 

Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 

the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 

available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal 

year 2012 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 

(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 

transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same 

purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
362 

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that 

the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 

(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this section shall 

be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. 

(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided 

by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided 

under section 1001. 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 

SEC. 1531. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 

(a) USE AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) of 

section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as 

in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 

(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds 

made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2012. 

(b) MONTHLY OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.—Not 

later than 15 days after the end of each month of fiscal year 2012, 

the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 

Fund explaining monthly commitments, obligations, and expenditures by line of action. 

SEC. 1532. CONTINUATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF UNITED 

STATES FUNDS FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES PROJECTS IN 

IRAQ. 

Section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 

4651) shall apply to funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

title. 

SEC. 1533. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN AFGHANISTAN SECURITY 

FORCES FUND. 

(a) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS.—Funds available 

to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces 

Fund for fiscal year 2012 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 

181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 

(b) AVAILABILITY FOR LITERACY INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING.— 

Assistance provided utilizing funds in the Afghanistan Security 

Forces Fund may include literacy instruction and training to build 

the logistical, management, and administrative capacity of military 

and civilian personnel of the Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior, including through instruction at training facilities of the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Training Mission in Afghanistan. 

(c) MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTS.—Not later 

than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense commitVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00392 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
363 

tees a report containing the Secretary’s determination regarding 

whether the Department of Defense has sufficient management and 

oversight mechanisms in place with respect to contracts to be entered into during fiscal year 2012 using funds in the Afghanistan 

Security Forces Fund. If the Secretary determines that sufficient 

management and oversight mechanisms are not already in place, 

the Secretary shall include in the report a plan for improving such 

management and oversight mechanisms. 

SEC. 1534. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PROJECT AUTHORITY AND RELATED REQUIREMENTS OF TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS 

AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (6)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘October 31, 2011,’’ and inserting ‘‘October 31, 2011, and October 31, 2012’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

preceding fiscal year’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘September 30,2011’’ and 

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 

(b) AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.—Paragraph (3) of such subsection 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(3) SCOPE OF PROJECTS.—The projects carried out under 

paragraph (1) may include projects that facilitate private investment, mining sector development, industrial development, 

and other projects determined by the Secretary of Defense, with 

the concurrence of the Secretary of State, as strengthening stability or providing strategic support to the counterinsurgency 

campaign in Afghanistan. To the maximum extent possible, the 

activities of the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan should focus on improving the commercial viability of other reconstruction or development activities in 

Afghanistan conducted by the United States.’’. 

(c) FUNDING LIMITATION.—Paragraph (4) of such subsection is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting before the period at the end of the second 

sentence the following: ‘‘for fiscal year 2012, except that not 

more than 50 percent of such amount may be obligated until 

the plan required by subsection (b) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The 

funds shall be available for projects under paragraph (1) that 

begin in one fiscal year and end in the following fiscal year.’’. 

SEC. 1535. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR TRANS REGIONAL WEB INITIATIVE. 

None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

may be obligated or expended on any program under the Trans Regional Web Initiative of the Department of Defense, or any similar 

initiative, until the Secretary of Defense certifies, in writing, to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that such program— 

(1) appropriately defines its target audience; 

(2) is determined to be the most effective method to reach 

such target audience; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
364 

(3) is the most cost-effective means of reaching such target 

audience; and 

(4) includes measurement mechanisms to ensure such target audience is being reached. 

SEC. 1536. REPORT ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PARTICIPATION ON INTERAGENCY TEAMS FOR 

COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN AND 

IRAQ. 

(a) ASSESSMENT AND REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct a federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment on lessons learned from the use of 

interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan 

and Iraq. Not later than one year after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report containing the results of the assessment, together with the comments of the Secretary regarding the assessment 

and each of the elements of the assessment specified in subsection 

(b). 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment and report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the value of interagency teams in 

counterterrorism operations. 

(2) An explanation of how and why the requirements for effective interagency teams differ from teams composed entirely of 

Department of Defense personnel. 

(3) A description of the best practices of such interagency 

teams and efforts to codify such best practices. 

(4) A description of the challenges in forming and operating 

effective interagency teams. 

(5) An assessment whether the lessons learned through Department of Defense participation on such interagency teams is 

applicable to other interagency teams in which Department personnel participate. 

(6) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of adding a skill identifier to track Department civilian and military 

personnel who have successfully supported, participated on, or 

led an interagency team. 

(7) A description of the additional authorities, if any, needed to permit Department personnel to more effectively support, 

participate on, or lead an interagency team. 

(c) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) 

shall be submitted in unclassified form to the extent possible, but 

may include a classified annex. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 

This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’. 

SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 

(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in 

titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
365 

to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on 

the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2014; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2015. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family 

housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated 

funds have been obligated before the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2014; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for fiscal year 2015 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 

Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

Sec. 2108. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 

Sec. 2110. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2111. Tour normalization. 

Sec. 2112. Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications. 

Sec. 2113. Reduction of Army military construction authorization. 

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction 

projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ...................................... Fort Wainwright ....................................................................... $114,000,000 

JB Elmendorf-Richardson ....................................................... $103,600,000 

Alabama ................................... Fort Rucker ............................................................................... $11,600,000 

California ................................. Fort Irwin .................................................................................. $23,000,000 

Presidio Monterey ..................................................................... $3,000,000 

Colorado ................................... Fort Carson ............................................................................... $238,600,000 

Georgia ..................................... Fort Benning ............................................................................. $66,700,000 

Fort Gordon ............................................................................... $1,450,000 

Fort Stewart .............................................................................. $2,600,000 

Hawaii ..................................... Fort Shafter ............................................................................... $17,500,000 

Schofield Barracks .................................................................... $105,000,000 

Kansas ..................................... Forbes Air Field ........................................................................ $5,300,000 

Fort Riley ................................................................................... $83,400,000 

Kentucky .................................. Fort Campbell ........................................................................... $247,500,000 

Fort Knox ................................................................................... $55,000,000 

Louisiana ................................. Fort Polk .................................................................................... $70,100,000 

Maryland ................................. Aberdeen Proving Ground ........................................................ $78,500,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
366 

Army: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Fort Meade ................................................................................ $79,000,000 

Missouri ................................... Fort Leonard Wood ................................................................... $49,000,000 

North Carolina ........................ Fort Bragg ................................................................................. $186,000,000 

New York ................................. Fort Drum ................................................................................. $13,300,000 

Oklahoma ................................ Fort Sill ..................................................................................... $184,600,000 

McAlester ................................................................................... $8,000,000 

South Carolina ........................ Fort Jackson .............................................................................. $63,900,000 

Texas ........................................ Fort Bliss ................................................................................... $122,500,000 

Fort Hood .................................................................................. $132,000,000 

JB San Antonio ........................................................................ $10,400,000 

Red River Army Depot .............................................................. $44,000,000 

Utah ......................................... Dugway Proving Ground .......................................................... $32,000,000 

Virginia .................................... Fort Belvoir ............................................................................... $77,000,000 

JB Langley Eustis .................................................................... $26,000,000 

Washington .............................. JB Lewis McChord ................................................................... $296,300,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2104 and available for military construction projects outside the 

United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside 

the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 

table: 

Army: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Afghanistan ............................. Bagram Air Base ...................................................................... $80,000,000 

Germany .................................. Grafenwoehr .............................................................................. $38,000,000 

Landstuhl .................................................................................. $63,000,000 

Oberdachstetten ........................................................................ $12,200,000 

Stuttgart .................................................................................... $12,200,000 

Vilseck ........................................................................................ $20,000,000 

Korea, Republic of ................... Camp Carroll ............................................................................ $41,000,000 

Camp Henry .............................................................................. $48,000,000 

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 

(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2104 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 

may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 

in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: 

Army: Family Housing 

Country Installation or Location Units Amount 

Germany ......................................... Grafenwoehr .................................. Family Housing New 

Construction (26 

units) ..................... $13,000,000 

Illesheim ........................................ Family Housing Replacement Construction (80 units) $41,000,000 

Vilseck ........................................... Family Housing New 

Construction (22 

units) ..................... $12,000,000 

(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 and 

available for military family housing functions as specified in the 

funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
367 

out architectural and engineering services and construction design 

activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family 

housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,897,000. 

SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 

using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military family housing 

units in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000. 

SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 

functions of the Department of the Army, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Army shall not enter into 

an award for a Road and Infrastructure Improvements project at 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia, until the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that sufficient private funding has been 

raised and a construction award has been made to concurrently 

construct the ‘‘Baseline Museum’’ phase of the National Museum of 

the United States Army. 

SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for 

Fort Benning, Georgia, for construction of a Multipurpose Training 

Range at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct 

up to 1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the Army’s 

construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training Ranges. 

SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for 

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, for construction of an access road adjoining McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis, the 

Secretary of the Army may construct a secure elevated roadway over 

the existing railroad and public road in lieu of an on-grade road 

and access control point. 

SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) HAWAII.—In the case of the authorization contained in the 

table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 

Stat. 4437) for Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 

451 in lieu of building 452. 

(b) NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization contained in 

the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 

124 Stat. 4437) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of an 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
368 

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of 

the Army may construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking apron 

consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Aircraft 

Maintenance Hangars and associated parking aprons. 

(c) GERMANY.—In the case of the authorization contained in the 

table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 

Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden Air Base, Germany, for construction of an 

Information Processing Center at the installation, the Secretary of 

the Army may construct up to 9,400 square yards of vehicle parking 

garage consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 square yards of parking 

area. 

SEC. 2108. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 

YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 

(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Army may 

carry out a military construction project to construct a water treatment facility for Fort Irwin, California, in the amount of 

$115,000,000. 

(b) USE OF UNOBLIGATED PRIOR-YEAR ARMY MILITARY CON- STRUCTION FUNDS.—The Secretary may use available, unobligated 

Army military construction funds appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2012 for the project described in subsection (a). 

(c) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of title 

10, United States Code, regarding the project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project 

cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by section 

2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations. 

SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2008 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of 

Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), authorizations set forth in the 

table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 

Stat. 504), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date 

of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 

State Installation or Location Project Amount 

Louisiana ..................... Fort Polk ..................... Child Care Facility .......................................... $6,100,000 

Missouri ....................... Fort Leonard Wood .... Multipurpose Machine Gun Range ................. $4,150,000 

SEC. 2110. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2009 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of 

Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), authorizations set forth in the 

table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 

Stat. 4659), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date 

of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
369 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

Alabama ............... Anniston Army Depot ...... Lake Yard Interchange ............................. $1,400,000 

Hawaii .................. Schofield Barracks ........... Brigade Complex ....................................... $65,000,000 

Schofield Barracks Battalion Complex .................................... $69,000,000 

Schofield Barracks Battalion Complex .................................... $27,000,000 

Schofield Barracks Infrastructure Expansion ......................... $76,000,000 

New Jersey ........... Picatinny Arsenal Ballistic Evaluation Facility Phase I ...... $9,900,000 

Virginia ................ Fort Eustis ........................ Vehicle Paint Facility ............................... $3,900,000 

SEC. 2111. TOUR NORMALIZATION. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act 

may be obligated or expended for additional tour normalization 

until— 

(1) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation conducts an analysis of alternatives to tour normalization 

that identifies alternative courses of action and their associated 

life cycle costs, potential benefits, advantages, and disadvantages; 

(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a master plan for completing all phases of 

tour normalization that includes a detailed description of all 

costs and a schedule for the construction of necessary facilities 

and infrastructure; and 

(3) legislation enacted after the date of the enactment of 

this Act authorizes the obligation of funds for such purpose. 

SEC. 2112. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT CERTAIN PROJECT 

SPECIFICATIONS. 

The table in section 3002 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 

Stat. 4503) is amended— 

(1) in the item for the Army relating to ‘‘Entry Control 

Point and Access Roads’’ that appears immediately below the 

item relating to ‘‘Vet Clinic & Kennel’’ at Bagram Air Force 

Base, by striking ‘‘Delaram Ii’’ in the State/Country and Installation column and inserting ‘‘Delaram II’’; and 

(2) in the item for the Army that appears immediately 

below the item relating to ‘‘Electrical Utility Systems, Ph.2’’ at 

the Shank installation, by striking ‘‘Expand Extended Cooperation Programme I and Extended Cooperation Programme 2’’ in 

the Project Title column and inserting ‘‘Expand Entry Control 

Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2’’. 

SEC. 2113. REDUCTION OF ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 

Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby 

reduced by $100,000,000. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
370 

Sec. 2205. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 

Sec. 2206. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2207. Guam realignment. 

Sec. 2208. Reduction of Navy military construction authorization. 

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction 

projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Arizona ................................ Yuma ............................................................................................. $162,785,000 

California ............................ Barstow ......................................................................................... $8,590,000 

Bridgeport ..................................................................................... $16,138,000 

Camp Pendleton ........................................................................... $335,080,000 

Coronado ....................................................................................... $108,435,000 

Point Mugu ................................................................................... $15,377,000 

Twentynine Palms ........................................................................ $67,109,000 

Florida ................................. Jacksonville .................................................................................. $36,552,000 

Mayport ......................................................................................... $14,998,000 

Whiting Field ................................................................................ $20,620,000 

Georgia ................................ Kings Bay ..................................................................................... $86,063,000 

Hawaii ................................. Barking Sands ............................................................................. $9,679,000 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ............................................... $7,492,000 

Kaneohe Bay ................................................................................. $57,704,000 

Illinois ................................. Great Lakes .................................................................................. $91,042,000 

Maryland ............................. Indian Head ................................................................................. $67,779,000 

Patuxent River .............................................................................. $45,844,000 

North Carolina ................... Camp Lejeune ............................................................................... $200,482,000 

Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station ..................................... $17,760,000 

New River ..................................................................................... $78,930,000 

South Carolina ................... Beaufort ........................................................................................ $21,096,000 

Virginia ............................... Norfolk .......................................................................................... $108,228,000 

Portsmouth ................................................................................... $74,864,000 

Quantico ........................................................................................ $183,690,000 

Washington ......................... Bremerton ..................................................................................... $13,341,000 

Kitsap ............................................................................................ $758,842,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2204 and available for military construction projects outside the 

United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Bahrain ................................... SW Asia ..................................................................................... $55,010,000 

Diego Garcia ........................... Diego Garcia ............................................................................. $35,444,000 

Djibouti ................................... Camp Lemonier ......................................................................... $89,499,000 

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family 

housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
371 

construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount 

not to exceed $3,199,000. 

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 

using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing 

units in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000. 

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

SEC. 2205. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2008 PROJECT. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of 

Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth in 

the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201(c) of that Act 

(122 Stat. 511) and extended by section 2206 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military 

construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

Worldwide Unspecified ........... Various ..................................... Host Nation Infrastructure ..... $2,700,000 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT FOR CONSISTENCY IN PROJECT AUTHORIZATION DISPLAY.—The table in section 2201(c) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of 

Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 511) is amended to read as follows: 

Navy: Worldwide Unspecified 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

Worldwide Unspecified ........... Various ..................................... Wharf Utilities Upgrade ......... $8,900,000 

Worldwide Unspecified ........... Various ..................................... Host Nation Infrastructure ..... $2,700,000 

SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2009 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of 

Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorization set forth in 

the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act 

(122 Stat 4670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the 

date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 

year 2013, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
372 

Navy: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

California ................................................... Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendelton ............................. Operations Access Points, Red Beach .................................................... $11,970,000 

Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar ............................... Emergency Response Station .................................................................. $6,530,000 

District of Columbia .................................. Washington Navy Yard ................................................... Child Development Center ...................................................................... $9,340,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
373 

SEC. 2207. GUAM REALIGNMENT. 

(a) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in 

subsection (c), notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 

the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act, and none 

of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for military 

construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated to implement the realignment of 

United States Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam as envisioned in the United States–Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation issued May 1, 2006, until— 

(1) the Commandant of the Marine Corps, in consultation 

with the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, 

provides the congressional defense committees the Commandant’s preferred force lay-down for the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility; 

(2) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a master plan for the construction of facilities 

and infrastructure to execute the Commandant’s preferred force 

lay-down on Guam, including a detailed description of costs 

and a schedule for such construction; 

(3) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that tangible progress has been made regarding the relocation of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma; 

(4) a plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies is 

provided to the congressional defense committees detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the non-military utilities, facilities, and infrastructure on Guam affected by the realignment of forces; and 

(5) the Secretary of Defense— 

(A) submits to the congressional defense committees the 

report on the assessment of the United States force posture 

in East Asia and the Pacific region required under section 

346 of this Act; or 

(B) certifies to the congressional defense committees 

that the deadline established under such section for the 

submission of such report has not been met. 

(b) DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.— 

(1) AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, if the Secretary of Defense determines that any 

grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 

2012 under Federal programs administered by agencies other 

than the Department of Defense will result in the development 

(including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, such grant, transfer cooperative agreement, 

or supplemental funding shall be specifically authorized by law. 

(2) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘public infrastructure’’ means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a 

public entity or State or local government that is used by, or 

constructed for the benefit of, the general public. 

(c) EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of Defense may use funds described in subsection (a) to carry 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
374 

out additional analysis under the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 to include the following actions: 

(1) A re-evaluation of live-fire training range complex alternatives, based upon the application of probabilistic modeling; 

and 

(2) The ongoing analysis on the impacts of the realignment 

and build-up on Guam as described in subsection (a) on coral 

reefs in Apra Harbor, Guam. 

SEC. 2208. REDUCTION OF NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 

Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby 

reduced by $25,000,000. 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Modification of authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2306. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project. 

Sec. 2307. Reduction of Air Force military construction authorization. 

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United 

States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Air Force: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ..................................... Eielson AFB .............................................................................. $45,000,000 

JB Elmendorf-Richardson ....................................................... $97,000,000 

Arizona ................................... Davis-Monthan AFB ................................................................. $33,000,000 

Luke AFB .................................................................................. $24,000,000 

California ............................... Travis AFB ................................................................................ $22,000,000 

Vandenberg AFB ....................................................................... $14,200,000 

Colorado ................................. U.S. Air Force Academy ........................................................... $13,400,000 

Delaware ................................. Dover AFB ................................................................................. $2,800,000 

Kansas .................................... Fort Riley ................................................................................... $7,600,000 

Louisiana ................................ Barksdale AFB .......................................................................... $23,500,000 

Missouri .................................. Whiteman AFB .......................................................................... $4,800,000 

North Carolina ....................... Pope AFB ................................................................................... $6,000,000 

North Dakota ......................... Minot AFB ................................................................................. $67,800,000 

Nebraska ................................. Offutt AFB ................................................................................. $564,000,000 

New Mexico ............................. Cannon AFB .............................................................................. $22,598,000 

Holloman AFB .......................................................................... $29,200,000 

Kirtland AFB ............................................................................ $25,000,000 

Nevada .................................... Nellis AFB ................................................................................. $35,850,000 

Texas ....................................... Joint Base San Antonio ............................................................ $110,000,000 

Utah ........................................ Hill AFB .................................................................................... $16,500,000 

Virginia ................................... JB Langley Eustis .................................................................... $50,000,000 

Washington ............................. Fairchild AFB ........................................................................... $27,600,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2304 and available for military construction projects outside the 

United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
375 

Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Air Force: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Greenland ............................... Thule AB ................................................................................... $28,000,000 

Guam ...................................... Joint Region Marianas ............................................................. $83,600,000 

Germany ................................. Ramstein AB ............................................................................. $34,697,000 

Italy ......................................... Sigonella .................................................................................... $15,000,000 

Korea, Republic Of ................. Osan AB .................................................................................... $23,000,000 

SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family 

housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to 

the construction or improvement of family housing units in an 

amount not to exceed $4,208,000. 

SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 

using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $80,546,000. 

SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

SEC. 2305. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2636) for 

Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, for construction of a Ground Control Tower at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may 

construct 43 vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 square 

meters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s construction guidelines for control towers, using amounts appropriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations in prior years. 

SEC. 2306. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2009 PROJECT. 

(a) EXTENSION.—The authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided for by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) under the 

heading ‘‘MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE’’, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, 

whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
376 

Air Force: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 

Location Installation or Location Project Amount 

Germany ..................... Spangdahlem Air Base ................ Child Development Center .... $11,400,000 

SEC. 2307. REDUCTION OF AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 

Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2012 are 

hereby reduced by $32,000,000. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 2421. Reduction of Defense Agencies military construction authorization. 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United 

States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ..................................... Anchorage .................................................................................. $18,400,000 

Eielson AFB .............................................................................. $14,800,000 

Alabama ................................. Redstone Arsenal ...................................................................... $58,800,000 

Arizona ................................... Davis-Monthan AFB ................................................................. $23,000,000 

California ............................... Camp Pendleton ........................................................................ $12,141,000 

Coronado ................................................................................... $42,000,000 

Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy ............................................ $15,500,000 

San Clemente ............................................................................ $21,800,000 

Colorado ................................. Buckley AFB .............................................................................. $140,932,000 

District of Columbia .............. Bolling AFB .............................................................................. $16,736,000 

Florida .................................... Eglin AFB ................................................................................. $51,600,000 

Eglin AUX 9 .............................................................................. $9,500,000 

MacDill AFB ............................................................................. $15,200,000 

Whiting Field ............................................................................ $3,800,000 

Georgia ................................... Fort Benning ............................................................................. $37,205,000 

Fort Gordon ............................................................................... $17,705,000 

Fort Stewart .............................................................................. $72,300,000 

Hawaii .................................... Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam ............................................ $14,400,000

Illinois ..................................... Great Lakes ............................................................................... $16,900,000 

Kentucky ................................. Fort Campbell ........................................................................... $138,500,000 

Fort Knox ................................................................................... $38,845,000 

Louisiana ................................ Barksdale AFB .......................................................................... $6,200,000 

Massachusetts ........................ Hanscom AFB ........................................................................... $34,040,000 

Westover ARB ............................................................................ $23,300,000 

Maryland ................................. Bethesda Naval Hospital ......................................................... $18,000,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
377 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Fort Meade ................................................................................ $29,640,000 

Joint Base Andrews .................................................................. $265,700,000 

Missouri .................................. Arnold ........................................................................................ $9,253,000 

Mississippi .............................. Columbus AFB .......................................................................... $2,600,000 

Gulfport ..................................................................................... $34,700,000 

North Carolina ....................... Camp Lejeune ........................................................................... $6,670,000 

Fort Bragg ................................................................................. $206,274,000 

New River .................................................................................. $22,687,000 

Pope AFB ................................................................................... $5,400,000 

New Mexico ............................. Cannon AFB .............................................................................. $132,997,000 

New York ................................ Fort Drum ................................................................................. $20,400,000 

Ohio ........................................ Columbus ................................................................................... $10,000,000 

Oklahoma ............................... Altus AFB .................................................................................. $8,200,000 

Pennsylvania .......................... DEF Distribution Depot New Cumberland ............................. $43,000,000 

Philadelphia .............................................................................. $8,000,000 

South Carolina ....................... Joint Base Charleston .............................................................. $24,868,000 

Texas ........................................ Joint Base San Antonio ............................................................ $194,300,000 

Virginia ................................... Charlottesville ........................................................................... $10,805,000 

Dahlgren .................................................................................... $1,988,000 

Dam Neck .................................................................................. $23,116,000 

Fort Belvoir ............................................................................... $54,625,000 

Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Story ........................ $37,000,000 

Pentagon .................................................................................... $8,742,000 

Quantico .................................................................................... $46,727,000 

Washington ............................. JB Lewis McChord ................................................................... $35,000,000 

Whidbey Island ......................................................................... $25,000,000 

West Virginia .......................... Camp Dawson ........................................................................... $2,200,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2403 and available for military construction projects outside the 

United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside 

the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 

table: 

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Germany ................................. Ansbach ..................................................................................... $11,672,000 

Baumholder ............................................................................... $59,419,000 

Grafenwoehr .............................................................................. $6,529,000 

Rhine Ordnance Barracks ........................................................ $750,000,000 

Spangdalem Air Base ............................................................... $129,043,000 

Stuttgart-Patch Barracks ......................................................... $2,434,000 

Italy ......................................... Vicenza ...................................................................................... $41,864,000 

Japan ...................................... Yokota Air Base ........................................................................ $61,842,000 

United Kingdom ..................... Menwith Hill Station ............................................................... $68,601,000 

Royal Air Force Alconbury ....................................................... $35,030,000 

SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for energy conservation projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 

173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 

inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Alabama .................................................. Maxwell AFB ......................................................... $2,482,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
378 

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States—Continued 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Arizona .................................................... Davis-Monthan AFB ............................................. $4,650,000 

California ................................................ Presidio of Monterey ............................................. $5,000,000 

San Joaquin/Tracy Site ....................................... $2,860,000 

Colorado .................................................. Fort Carson ........................................................... $4,277,000 

Florida ..................................................... Tyndall AFB .......................................................... $3,255,000 

Georgia .................................................... MCLB Albany ........................................................ $3,504,000 

Kentucky .................................................. Fort Knox ............................................................... $2,750,000 

Massachusetts ......................................... Hanscom AFB ....................................................... $3,609,000 

New York ................................................. Fort Drum ............................................................. $3,500,000 

North Carolina ........................................ Fort Bragg ............................................................. $13,400,000 

North Carolina ........................................ Camp Lejeune ........................................................ $6,925,000 

Oklahoma ................................................ Altus AFB .............................................................. $5,700,000 

Tennessee ................................................. Arnold AFB ........................................................... $3,300,000 

Utah ......................................................... Tooele Army Depot ................................................ $8,200,000 

Virginia ................................................... NRO/ADF-E ......................................................... $2,000,000 

Wyoming .................................................. FE Warren AFB .................................................... $12,600,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside the 

United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects 

under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 

forth in the following table: 

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Guam ....................................................... NB Guam ............................................................... $17,377,000 

Italy .......................................................... NAS Naples ........................................................... $2,867,000 

Marshall Islands ..................................... Kwajalein Atoll ..................................................... $6,300,000 

Various Locations ................................... Various Locations ................................................. $20,444,000 

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing 

functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall not enter into 

an award for a Replacement of the Wetzel-Smith Elementary School 

project at Baumholder, Germany, until the Secretary completes an 

assessment of United States military force structure in the European 

theater and certifies to the congressional defense committees that 

Baumholder, Germany is an enduring location. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction and 

land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4601. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
379 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

SEC. 2421. REDUCTION OF DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 

Amounts previously authorized for military construction, land 

acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) for fiscal 

years prior to fiscal year 2012 are hereby reduced by $131,400,000. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION 

SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 

not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 

for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, 

for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501, as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects. 

Sec. 2613. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 and 2009 

projects. 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and 

available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the 

funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00409 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
380 

quire real property and carry out military construction projects for 

the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and 

in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army National Guard: Inside the United States 

State Location Amount 

Alabama ............................... Fort McClellan ............................................................................ $16,500,000 

Arkansas ............................... Fort Chaffee ................................................................................. $3,500,000 

Arizona ................................. Papago Military Reservation ...................................................... $17,800,000 

California ............................. Camp Roberts .............................................................................. $38,160,000 

Camp San Luis Obispo .............................................................. $8,000,000 

Colorado ............................... Alamosa ....................................................................................... $6,400,000 

Aurora .......................................................................................... $3,600,000 

Fort Carson ................................................................................. $43,000,000 

District of Columbia ............ Anacostia ..................................................................................... $5,300,000 

Florida .................................. Camp Blanding ........................................................................... $5,500,000 

Georgia ................................. Atlanta ......................................................................................... $11,000,000 

Hinesville ..................................................................................... $17,500,000 

Macon .......................................................................................... $14,500,000 

Hawaii .................................. Kalaeloa ....................................................................................... $33,000,000 

Illinois .................................. Normal ......................................................................................... $10,000,000 

Indiana ................................. Camp Atterbury .......................................................................... $81,900,000 

Indianapolis ................................................................................ $25,700,000 

Massachusetts ...................... Natick .......................................................................................... $9,000,000 

Maryland .............................. Dundalk ....................................................................................... $16,000,000 

La Plata ....................................................................................... $9,000,000 

Westminster ................................................................................. $10,400,000 

Maine .................................... Bangor ......................................................................................... $15,600,000 

Brunswick .................................................................................... $23,000,000 

Minnesota ............................. Camp Ripley ................................................................................ $8,400,000 

Mississippi ............................ Camp Shelby ............................................................................... $64,600,000 

North Carolina ..................... Greensboro ................................................................................... $3,700,000 

Nebraska .............................. Grand Island ............................................................................... $22,000,000 

Mead ............................................................................................ $9,100,000 

New Jersey ........................... Lakehurst ..................................................................................... $49,000,000 

New Mexico .......................... Santa Fe ...................................................................................... $5,200,000 

Nevada .................................. Las Vegas .................................................................................... $23,000,000 

Oklahoma ............................. Camp Gruber ............................................................................... $13,361,000 

Oregon .................................. The Dalles .................................................................................... $13,800,000 

South Carolina .................... Allendale ...................................................................................... $4,300,000 

Utah ...................................... Camp Williams ........................................................................... $6,500,000 

Virginia ................................ Fort Pickett .................................................................................. $11,000,000 

Wisconsin .............................. Camp Williams ........................................................................... $7,000,000 

West Virginia ....................... Buckhannon ................................................................................ $10,000,000 

Wyoming ............................... Cheyenne ...................................................................................... $8,900,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified 

in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may 

acquire real property and carry out military construction projects 

for the Army National Guard locations outside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army National Guard: Outside the United States 

Country Location Amount 

Puerto Rico ....................................... Fort Buchanan ................................................................ $57,000,000 

SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 

ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 

Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside 

the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 

table: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
381 

Army Reserve 

Country Location Amount 

California .......................................... Fort Hunter Liggett ........................................................ $5,200,000 

Colorado ............................................ Fort Collins ..................................................................... $13,600,000 

Illinois ............................................... Homewood ....................................................................... $16,000,000 

Rockford .......................................................................... $12,800,000 

Indiana ............................................. Fort Benjamin Harrison ................................................ $57,000,000 

Kansas ............................................... Kansas City ..................................................................... $13,000,000 

Massachusetts ................................... Attleboro .......................................................................... $22,000,000 

Minnesota ......................................... Saint Joseph ................................................................... $11,800,000 

Missouri ............................................ Weldon Springs .............................................................. $19,000,000 

North Carolina ................................. Greensboro ...................................................................... $19,000,000 

New York .......................................... Schenectady .................................................................... $20,000,000 

South Carolina ................................. Orangeburg ..................................................................... $12,000,000 

Wisconsin .......................................... Fort McCoy ...................................................................... $27,300,000 

SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 

Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 

Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the 

amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 

State Location Amount 

Pennsylvania .................................... Pittsburgh ....................................................................... $13,759,000 

Tennessee .......................................... Memphis .......................................................................... $7,949,000 

SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 

Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry 

out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 

following table: 

Air National Guard 

State Location Amount 

California .......................................... Beale AFB ....................................................................... $6,100,000 

Moffett Field ................................................................... $26,000,000 

Hawaii .............................................. Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam .................................. $39,521,000

Indiana ............................................. Fort Wayne IAP .............................................................. $4,000,000 

Massachusetts ................................... Otis ANGB ...................................................................... $7,800,000 

Maryland .......................................... Martin State Airport ...................................................... $4,900,000 

Ohio ................................................... Springfield Beckley-MAP ............................................... $6,700,000 

SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National 

Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry 

out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations 

inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
382 

Air Force Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California .......................................... March AFB ..................................................................... $16,393,000 

South Carolina ................................. Charleston AFB .............................................................. $9,593,000 

SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 

AND RESERVE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities 

for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, 

under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the 

cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the 

funding table in section 4601. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 2611. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2008 PROJECT. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of 

Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth in 

the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that Act 

(122 Stat. 527) and extended by section 2607 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4454), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 

funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is 

later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 

STATE INSTALLATION OR

LOCATION PROJECT AMOUNT

Pennsylvania ............................ East Fallowfield Township ..... Readiness Center (SBCT) ....................................................... $ 8,300,000 

SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2009 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of 

Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorizations set forth 

in the tables in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, 

and 2603 of that Act (122 Stat. 4699), shall remain in effect until 

October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 

funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is 

later. 

(b) TABLE.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as follows: 

Army National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorizations 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

Indiana ......................... Camp Atterbury ........ Machine Gun Range ...................................... $ 5,800,000 

Nevada ......................... Elko ............................ Readiness Center ........................................... $11,375,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
383 

Army Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

New York ...................... Staten Island ............. Reserve Center ............................................... $18,550,000 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

Delaware ...................... Wilmington ................ Reserve Center ............................................... $11,530,000 

Air National Guard: Extension of 2009 Project Authorization 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

Mississippi ................... Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport .... Relocate munitions storage complex ............. $3,400,000 

SEC. 2613. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2008 AND 2009 PROJECTS. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT ARMY RESERVE CENTER

PROJECT, CARLIN, NEVADA.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110– 

417; 122 Stat. 4701) for Elko, Nevada, for construction of an Army 

Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct a 

Readiness Center at Carlin, Nevada. 

(b) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT ARMY RESERVE CENTER

PROJECT, FORT WADSWORTH, NEW YORK.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4703) for Staten Island, New York, for 

construction of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army 

may instead construct an addition/alteration at the Army Reserve 

Center at Fort Wadsworth, New York. 

(c) AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT READINESS CENTER PROJECT, 

COATESVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110- 

181, 122 Stat. 527) for Fallowfield Township, Pennsylvania, for construction of a Readiness Center, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct the Readiness Center at Coatesville, Pennsylvania. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 

ACTIVITIES 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. 

Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 

Sec. 2703. Authority to complete specific base closure and realignment recommendations. 

Sec. 2704. Special considerations related to transportation infrastructure in consideration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
384 

SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2011, for base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military 

construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 

101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 

of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 

of such Act, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE 

CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2703 and available for base realignment 

and closure activities as specified in the funding table in section 

4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public 

Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 

2906A of such Act, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

SEC. 2703. AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE SPECIFIC BASE CLOSURE AND 

REALIGNMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 

(a) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO EXTEND IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD.—The Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) complete all closures and realignments recommended in 

the report of the Base Closure and Realignment Commission 

transmitted by the President to Congress in accordance with 

section 2914(e) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 

U.S.C. 2687 note), as expeditiously as possible; and 

(2) complete the closure of the Umatilla Chemical Depot, 

Oregon, as recommended in the report of the Base Closure and 

Realignment Commission transmitted by the President to Congress in accordance with section 2914(e) of the Defense Base 

Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of 

Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)— 

(A) without regard to any condition contained in that 

recommendation; and 

(B) not later than one year after the completion of the 

chemical demilitarization mission in accordance with the 

Chemical Weapons Convention Treaty. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

law, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out the authority provided 

under subsection (a), and any related property management and 

disposal activities, in accordance with the procedures and authorities under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 

(part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
385 

SEC. 2704. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION 

INFRASTRUCTURE IN CONSIDERATION AND SELECTION 

OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS FOR CLOSURE OR REALIGNMENT. 

(a) MODIFICATION OF SELECTION CRITERIA.—Subsection (b)(1) 

of section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘notification an evaluation’’ and inserting 

‘‘notification— 

‘‘(A) an evaluation’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) the criteria used to consider and recommend military installations for such closure or realignment, which 

shall include at a minimum consideration of— 

‘‘(i) the ability of the infrastructure (including 

transportation infrastructure) of both the existing and 

receiving communities to support forces, missions, and 

personnel as a result of such closure or realignment; 

and 

‘‘(ii) the costs associated with community transportation infrastructure improvements as part of the evaluation of cost savings or return on investment of such 

closure or realignment; and’’. 

(b) EFFECT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS.—Such section is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) If the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military 

department concerned determines, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), that a significant transportation impact will occur at a result of an action described in subsection (a), the action may not be taken unless and 

until the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned— 

‘‘(1) analyzes the adequacy of transportation infrastructure 

at and in the vicinity of each military installation that would 

be impacted by the action; 

‘‘(2) concludes consultation with the Secretary of Transportation with regard to such impact; 

‘‘(3) analyzes the impact of the action on local businesses, 

neighborhoods, and local governments; and 

‘‘(4) includes in the notification required by subsection 

(b)(1) a description of how the Secretary intends to remediate 

the significant transportation impact.’’. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL 

PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Prohibition on use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military construction and military family housing projects. 

Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction projects. 

Sec. 2803. Protections for suppliers of labor and materials under contracts for military construction projects and military family housing projects. 

Sec. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States. 

Sec. 2805. General military construction transfer authority. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
386 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Clarification of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for minor construction and alteration activities at Pentagon Reservation. 

Sec. 2812. Reporting requirements related to the granting of easements. 

Sec. 2813. Limitations on use or development of property in Clear Zone Areas and 

clarification of authority to limit encroachments. 

Sec. 2814. Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities. 

Sec. 2815. Exchange of property at military installations. 

Sec. 2816. Defense access road program enhancements to address transportation infrastructure in vicinity of military installations. 

Subtitle C—Energy Security 

Sec. 2821. Consolidation of definitions used in energy security chapter. 

Sec. 2822. Consideration of energy security in developing energy projects on military 

installations using renewable energy sources. 

Sec. 2823. Establishment of interim objective for Department of Defense 2025 renewable energy goal. 

Sec. 2824. Use of centralized purchasing agents for renewable energy certificates to 

reduce cost of facility energy projects using renewable energy sources 

and improve efficiencies. 

Sec. 2825. Identification of energy-efficient products for use in construction, repair, 

or renovation of Department of Defense facilities. 

Sec. 2826. Submission of annual Department of Defense energy management reports. 

Sec. 2827. Requirement for Department of Defense to capture and track data generated in metering Department facilities. 

Sec. 2828. Metering of Navy piers to accurately measure energy consumption. 

Sec. 2829. Training policy for Department of Defense energy managers. 

Sec. 2830. Report on energy-efficiency standards and prohibition on use of funds for 

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design gold or platinum certification. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 

Sec. 2841. Certification of medical care coverage for H–2B temporary workforce on 

military construction projects on Guam. 

Sec. 2842. Repeal of condition on use of specific utility conveyance authority regarding Guam integrated water and wastewater treatment system. 

Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2851. Land conveyance and exchange, Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska. 

Sec. 2852. Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas. 

Sec. 2853. Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana Nui 

areas, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2854. Land exchange, Fort Bliss Texas. 

Sec. 2855. Land conveyance, former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 2861. Redesignation of Industrial College of the Armed Forces as the Dwight 

D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy. 

Sec. 2862. Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as Mike 

O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center. 

Sec. 2863. Prohibition on naming Department of Defense real property after a Member of Congress. 

Sec. 2864. Notifications of reductions in number of members of the Armed Forces assigned to permanent duty at a military installation. 

Sec. 2865. Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under jurisdiction of Department of the Navy. 

Sec. 2866. Report on the Homeowners Assistance Program. 

Sec. 2867. Data servers and centers. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
387 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military 

Family Housing Changes 

SEC. 2801. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ANY COST-PLUS SYSTEM OF CONTRACTING FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND MILITARY 

FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—Section 2306 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) A contract entered into by the United States in connection 

with a military construction project or a military family housing 

project may not use any form of cost-plus contracting. This prohibition is in addition to the prohibition specified in subsection (a) on 

the use of the cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting 

and applies notwithstanding a declaration of war or the declaration 

by the President of a national emergency under section 201 of the 

National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1621) that includes the use of 

the armed forces.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c) of section 

2306 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), 

shall apply with respect to any contract entered into by the United 

States in connection with a military construction project or a military family housing project after the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 

(a) SINGLE THRESHOLD FOR USE OF OPERATION AND MAINTE- NANCE FUNDS.—Subsection (c) of section 2805 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘not more than’’ and all that follows through 

the end of the subsection and inserting ‘‘not more than 

$750,000.’’. 

(b) EXTENSION OF SPECIAL LABORATORY REVITALIZATION AU- THORITY.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘February 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘February 1, 2014’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ and 

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2016’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) CROSS REFERENCES REGARDING WORKING-CAPITAL

FUNDS.—Section 2208 of such title is amended— 

(A) in subsection (k)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘section 

2805(c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(c)’’; and 

(B) in subsection (o)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘section 

2805(c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(c)’’. 

(2) CROSS REFERENCE REGARDING COST AND SCOPE OF

WORK VARIATIONS.—Section 2853(a) of such title is amended by 

striking ‘‘section 2805(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(a)’’. 

(3) CROSS REFERENCE REGARDING NOTICE AND WAIT RE- QUIREMENTS FOR RESERVE PROJECTS.—Section 

18233a(b)(2)(B)(ii) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘section 

2805(a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2805(a)’’. 

(4) CROSS REFERENCE REGARDING USING OPERATION AND

MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR SMALL RESERVE PROJECTS.—Section 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
388 

18233b of such title is amended by striking ‘‘not more than’’ 

and all that follows through the end of the section and inserting 

‘‘not more than the amount specified in section 2805(c) of this 

title.’’. 

SEC. 2803. PROTECTIONS FOR SUPPLIERS OF LABOR AND MATERIALS 

UNDER CONTRACTS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

PROJECTS AND MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PROJECTS. 

Section 2852 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) In the case of a military construction project or a military 

family housing project, the contract amount thresholds specified in 

subchapter III of chapter 31 of title 40 (commonly referred to as the 

Miller Act) shall be applied by substituting ‘$150,000’ for ‘$100,000’ 

for purposes of determining when a performance bond and payment 

bond are required under section 3131 of such title and when alternatives to payment bonds as payment protections for suppliers of 

labor and materials are required under section 3132 of such title.’’. 

SEC. 2804. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED AUTHORITY TO USE 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 

(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 2808 of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently 

amended by section 2804 of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 

Stat. 4459), is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’; and 

(2) in subsection (h)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ 

and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’. 

(b) MODIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORTING REQUIREMENT.— Subsection (g) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY REPORTS OR’’ in the subsection 

heading; 

(2) by striking ‘‘the report for a fiscal-year quarter under 

subsection (d) or’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘report or’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Subsections (a) and (i) of such 

section are amended by striking ‘‘Combined Task Force-Horn of Africa’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Combined Joint Task 

Force-Horn of Africa’’. 

SEC. 2805. GENERAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of 

a military department, or with respect to the Defense Agencies, 

the Secretary of Defense, that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary concerned may transfer amounts of 

authorization of appropriations made available to that military 

department or Defense Agency in this division for fiscal year 

2012 between any such authorization of appropriations for that 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
389 

military department or Defense Agency for that fiscal year. 

Amounts of authorization of appropriations so transferred shall 

be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the 

authorization of appropriations to which transferred. 

(2) AGGREGATE LIMIT.—The aggregate amount of authorizations that the Secretaries concerned may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $400,000,000. 

(b) LIMITATION.—The authority provided by this section to 

transfer authorizations may only be used to fund increases in the 

cost of military construction projects or activities authorized by this 

division. 

(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made 

from one account to another under the authority of this section shall 

be deemed to increase the amount authorized for appropriation for 

the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal 

to the amount transferred. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary concerned shall 

promptly notify the congressional defense committees of each transfer made by that Secretary under subsection (a) that exceeds the 

limitations on cost variations provided in section 2853 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

SEC. 2811. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE PENTAGON RESERVATION MAINTENANCE REVOLVING FUND FOR MINOR 

CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION ACTIVITIES AT PENTAGON RESERVATION. 

Section 2674(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The authority’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) Except as 

provided in subparagraph (B), the authority’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) Notwithstanding the date specified in subparagraph (A), 

the Secretary may use monies from the Fund after that date to support construction or alteration activities at the Pentagon Reservation 

within the limits specified in section 2805 of this title.’’. 

SEC. 2812. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE GRANTING 

OF EASEMENTS. 

Section 2662 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1)(C), by striking ‘‘lease or license’’ and 

inserting ‘‘lease, license, or easement’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘lease or license’’ and 

inserting ‘‘lease, license, or easement’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘lease or license’’ 

and inserting ‘‘lease, license, or easement’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (3)— 

(i) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘lease or license’’ and inserting ‘‘lease, license, or easement’’; and 

(ii) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘lease or license’’ and inserting ‘‘lease, license, or easement’’. 

SEC. 2813. LIMITATIONS ON USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY IN 

CLEAR ZONE AREAS AND CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 

TO LIMIT ENCROACHMENTS. 

Section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
390 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(3) protecting Clear Zone Areas from use or encroachment 

that is incompatible with the mission of the installation.’’; 

(2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: 

‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.— Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, an agreement under this section that is a cooperative agreement or a grant may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United 

States Government.’’; 

(3) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in paragraph (3)— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘, and the monitoring and enforcement of any right, title, or interest in,’’ after ‘‘resources 

on’’; 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘and monitoring and enforcement’’ 

after ‘‘natural resource management’’; and 

(iii) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Any such 

payment by the United States— 

‘‘(A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount 

intended to cover the future costs of natural resource management and monitoring and enforcement; and 

‘‘(B) may be placed by the eligible entity in an interest-bearing account, and any interest shall be applied for the same purposes as the principal.’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (5)— 

(i) inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(5)’’; 

(ii) by inserting after the first sentence the following: ‘‘No such requirement need be included in the 

agreement if the property or interest is being transferred to a State, or the agreement requires it to be subsequently transferred to a State, and the Secretary concerned determines that the laws and regulations applicable to the future use of such property or interest provide adequate assurance that the property concerned 

will be developed and used in a manner appropriate 

for purposes of this section.’’; and 

(iii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if all or a portion of 

the property or interest acquired under the agreement is subsequently transferred to the United States and administrative jurisdiction over the property is under a Federal official other than a 

Secretary concerned, the Secretary concerned and that Federal official shall enter into a memorandum of agreement providing, to the 

satisfaction of the Secretary concerned, for the management of the 

property or interest concerned in a manner appropriate for purposes 

of this section. Such memorandum of agreement shall also provide 

that, should it be proposed that the property or interest concerned 

be developed or used in a manner not appropriate for purposes of 

this section, including declaring the property to be excess to the 

agency’s needs or proposing to exchange the property for other propVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00420 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
391 

erty, the Secretary concerned may request that administrative jurisdiction over the property be transferred to the Secretary concerned 

at no cost, and, upon such a request being made, the administrative 

jurisdiction over the property shall be transferred accordingly.’’; and 

(4) in subsection (i), by inserting after paragraph (2) the 

following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The term ‘Clear Zone Area’ means an area immediately 

beyond the end of the runway of an airfield that is needed to 

ensure the safe and unrestricted passage of aircraft in and over 

the area.’’. 

SEC. 2814. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONSERVATION AND CULTURAL 

ACTIVITIES. 

Section 2694(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and sustainability’’ 

after ‘‘safety’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) The implementation of ecosystem-wide land management plans— 

‘‘(i) for a single ecosystem that encompasses at least two 

non-contiguous military installations, if those military installations are not all under the administrative jurisdiction 

of the same Secretary of a military department; and 

‘‘(ii) providing synergistic benefits unavailable if the installations acted separately.’’. 

SEC. 2815. EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY AT MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 

(a) EXCHANGE AUTHORITY.—Section 2869 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘Conveyance of 

property at military installations to limit encroachment’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Exchange of property at military installations’’; and 

(2) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED; CONSIDERATION’’ and inserting ‘‘EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘to any person who 

agrees, in exchange for the real property, to carry out a 

land acquisition’’ and inserting ‘‘to any eligible entity who 

agrees, in exchange for the real property, to transfer to the 

United States all right, title, and interest of the entity in 

and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon under their control, or to carry out a land 

acquisition’’. 

(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Such section is further amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (f); and 

(2) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 

(f) and (g), respectively. 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2869 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘2869. Exchange of property at military installations.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
392 

SEC. 2816. DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS TO ADDRESS TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN VICINITY 

OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 

(a) AVAILABILITY OF DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS FUNDS FOR

BRAC-RELATED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS.—Section 

210(a)(2) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall 

determine the magnitude of the required improvements without regard to the extent to which traffic generated by the reservation is 

greater than other traffic in the vicinity of the reservation.’’. 

(b) ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS FUNDING SOURCES.— 

(1) CONVENING OF COMMITTEE.—Not later than 90 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, as the chairperson of the Economic Adjustment Committee established in Executive Order No. 127887 (10 U.S.C. 

2391 note), shall convene the Economic Adjustment Committee 

to consider additional sources of funding for the defense access 

roads program under section 210 of title 23, United States 

Code. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

Congress a report describing the results of the Economic Adjustment Committee deliberations and containing an implementation plan to expand funding sources for the mitigation of significant transportation impacts to access to military reservations pursuant to subsection (b) of section 210 of title 23, United 

States Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

(c) SEPARATE BUDGET REQUEST FOR PROGRAM.—Amounts requested for a fiscal year for the defense access roads program under 

section 210 of title 23, United States Code, shall be set forth as a 

separate budget request in the budget transmitted by the President 

to Congress for that fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, 

United States. 

Subtitle C—Energy Security 

SEC. 2821. CONSOLIDATION OF DEFINITIONS USED IN ENERGY SECURITY CHAPTER. 

(a) CONSOLIDATION OF DEFINITIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 173 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting before section 2925 

the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2924. Definitions 

‘‘In this chapter: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘defined fuel source’ means any of the following: 

‘‘(A) Petroleum. 

‘‘(B) Natural gas. 

‘‘(C) Coal. 

‘‘(D) Coke. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘energy-efficient maintenance’ includes— 

‘‘(A) the repair of military vehicles, equipment, or facility and infrastructure systems, such as lighting, heating, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
393 

cooling equipment or systems, or industrial processes, by replacement with technology that— 

‘‘(i) will achieve energy savings over the life-cycle of 

the equipment or system being repaired; and 

‘‘(ii) will meet the same end needs as the equipment or system being repaired; and 

‘‘(B) improvements in an operation or maintenance 

process, such as improved training or improved controls, 

that result in energy savings. 

‘‘(3)(A) The term ‘energy security’ means having assured access to reliable supplies of energy and the ability to protect and 

deliver sufficient energy to meet mission essential requirements. 

‘‘(B) In selecting facility energy projects that will use renewable energy sources, pursuit of energy security means the installation will give favorable consideration to projects that provide 

power directly to a military facility or into the installation electrical distribution network. In such cases, projects should be 

prioritized to provide power for assets critical to mission essential requirements on the installation in the event of a disruption 

in the commercial grid. 

‘‘(4) The term ‘hybrid’, with respect to a motor vehicle, 

means a motor vehicle that draws propulsion energy from onboard sources of stored energy that are both— 

‘‘(A) an internal combustion or heat engine using combustible fuel; and 

‘‘(B) a rechargeable energy storage system. 

‘‘(5) The term ‘operational energy’ means the energy required for training, moving, and sustaining military forces and 

weapons platforms for military operations. The term includes 

energy used by tactical power systems and generators and 

weapons platforms. 

‘‘(6) The term ‘petroleum’ means natural or synthetic crude, 

blends of natural or synthetic crude, and products refined or 

derived from natural or synthetic crude or from such blends. 

‘‘(7) The term ‘renewable energy source’ means energy generated from renewable sources, including the following: 

‘‘(A) Solar, including electricity. 

‘‘(B) Wind. 

‘‘(C) Biomass. 

‘‘(D) Landfill gas. 

‘‘(E) Ocean, including tidal, wave, current, and thermal. 

‘‘(F) Geothermal, including electricity and heat pumps. 

‘‘(G) Municipal solid waste. 

‘‘(H) New hydroelectric generation capacity achieved 

from increased efficiency or additions of new capacity at an 

existing hydroelectric project. For purposes of this subparagraph, hydroelectric generation capacity is ‘new’ if it was 

placed in service on or after January 1, 1999. 

‘‘(I) Thermal energy generated by any of the preceding 

sources.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—Such chapter is further 

amended— 

(A) in the table of subchapters at the beginning of such 

chapter, by striking ‘‘2925’’ and inserting ‘‘2924’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
394 

(B) in the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of such chapter, by inserting before the item relating to section 2925 the following new item: 

‘‘2924. Definitions.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS STRIKING SEPARATE DEFINI- TIONS.—Such chapter is further amended— 

(1) in section 2911— 

(A) in subsection (d)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For the purpose’’; 

(ii) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), 

and (D) as paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively; and 

(B) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (2); 

(2) in section 2922e, by striking subsections (e) and (f); 

(3) in section 2922g, by striking subsection (d); and 

(4) in section 2925(b), by striking paragraph (4). 

SEC. 2822. CONSIDERATION OF ENERGY SECURITY IN DEVELOPING 

ENERGY PROJECTS ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS USING 

RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES. 

(a) POLICY OF PURSUING ENERGY SECURITY.— (1) POLICY REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a policy for military installations that includes the following: 

(A) Favorable consideration for energy security in the 

design and development of energy projects on the military 

installation that will use renewable energy sources. 

(B) Guidance for commanders of military installations 

inside the United States on planning measures to minimize 

the effects of a disruption of services by a utility that sells 

natural gas, water, or electric energy to those installations 

in the event that a disruption occurs. 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide 

notification to the congressional defense committees within 30 

days after entering into any agreement for a facility energy 

project described in paragraph (1)(A) that excludes pursuit of 

energy security on the grounds that inclusion of energy security 

is cost prohibitive. The Secretary shall also provide a cost-benefit-analysis of the decision. 

(3) ENERGY SECURITY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘‘energy security’’ has the meaning given that term in paragraph (3) of section 2924 of title 10, United States Code, as 

added by section 2821(a). 

(b) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING ENERGY PERFORMANCE GOALS AND ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN.—Section 2911(c) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(12) Opportunities for improving energy security for facility energy projects that will use renewable energy sources.’’. 

(c) DEVELOPMENT OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY ON MILITARY

LANDS.—Section 2917 of such title is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
395 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) CONSIDERATION OF ENERGY SECURITY.—The development 

of a geothermal energy project under subsection (a) should include 

consideration of energy security in the design and development of 

the project.’’. 

(d) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 2925(a) of such title is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘whether the project incorporates energy security into its design,’’ after ‘‘through the 

duration of each such mechanism,’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(10) Details of utility outages at military installations including the total number and locations of outages, the financial 

impact of the outage, and measures taken to mitigate outages 

in the future at the affected location and across the Department 

of Defense.’’. 

SEC. 2823. ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERIM OBJECTIVE FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 2025 RENEWABLE ENERGY GOAL. 

(a) INTERIM OBJECTIVE.—Section 2911(e) of title 10, United 

States Code, as amended by section 2821(b)(1)(B), is further amended by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) To help ensure that the goal specified in paragraph (1)(A) 

regarding the use of renewable energy by the Department of Defense 

is achieved, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an interim goal 

for fiscal year 2018 for the production or procurement of facility energy from renewable energy sources.’’. 

(b) DEADLINE; CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 

180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of the 

interim renewable energy goal established pursuant to the amendment made by subsection (a). 

SEC. 2824. USE OF CENTRALIZED PURCHASING AGENTS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES TO REDUCE COST OF FACILITY ENERGY PROJECTS USING RENEWABLE ENERGY 

SOURCES AND IMPROVE EFFICIENCIES. 

(a) PURCHASE AND USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES.—Section 2911(e) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 

by sections 2821(b)(1)(B) and 2823(a), is further amended by adding 

at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3)(A) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a policy to 

maximize savings for the bulk purchase of replacement renewable 

energy certificates in connection with the development of facility energy projects using renewable energy sources. 

‘‘(B) Under the policy required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary of a military department shall submit requests for the purchase of replacement renewable energy certificates to a centralized 

purchasing authority maintained by such department or the Defense 

Logistics Agency with expertise regarding— 

‘‘(i) the market for renewable energy certificates; 

‘‘(ii) the procurement of renewable energy certificates; and 

‘‘(iii) obtaining the best value for the military department 

by maximizing the purchase of renewable energy certificates 

from projects placed into service before January 1, 1999. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
396 

‘‘(C) The centralized purchasing authority shall solicit industry 

for the most competitive offer for replacement renewable energy certificates, to include a combination of renewable energy certificates 

from new projects and projects placed into service before January 1, 

1999. 

‘‘(D) Subparagraph (B) does not prohibit the Secretary of a military department from entering into an agreement outside of the centralized purchasing authority if the Secretary will obtain the best 

value by bundling the renewable energy certificates with the facility 

energy project through a power purchase agreement or other contractual mechanism at the installation. 

‘‘(E) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to authorize 

the purchase of renewable energy certificates to meet Federal goals 

or mandates in the absence of the development of a facility energy 

project using renewable energy sources. 

‘‘(F) This policy does not make the purchase of renewable energy 

certificates mandatory, but the policy shall apply whenever original 

renewable energy certificates are proposed to be swapped for replacement renewable energy certificates.’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 2925(a) of title 10, 

United States Code, as amended by section 2822(d), is further 

amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (11) as paragraphs (5) through (12), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) In addition to the information contained in the table 

listing energy projects financed through third party financing 

mechanisms, as required by paragraph (3), the table also shall 

list any renewable energy certificates associated with each 

project, including information regarding whether the renewable 

energy certificates were bundled or unbundled, the purchasing 

authority for the renewable energy certificates, and the price of 

the associated renewable energy certificates.’’. 

SEC. 2825. IDENTIFICATION OF ENERGY-EFFICIENT PRODUCTS FOR 

USE IN CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, OR RENOVATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

(a) RESPONSIBILITY OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Section 

2915(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2)(A) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a definition of 

the term ‘energy-efficient product’ for purposes of this subsection 

and establish and maintain a list of products satisfying the definition. The definition and list shall be developed in consultation with 

the Secretary of Energy to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, consistency with definitions of the term used by other Federal agencies. 

‘‘(B) The Secretary shall modify the definition and list of energy-efficient products as necessary to account for emerging or 

changing technologies. 

‘‘(C) The list of energy-efficient products shall be included as 

part of the energy performance master plan developed pursuant to 

section 2911(b)(2) of this title.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
397 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TO ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN.—Section 2911(b)(2) of such title is amended by adding 

at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(F) The up-to date list of energy-efficient products maintained under section 2915(e)(2) of this title.’’. 

SEC. 2826. SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENERGY MANAGEMENT REPORTS. 

Section 2925(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘As part of the annual submission of the energy performance goals for the Department of Defense under section 2911 of this 

title, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report containing the 

following:’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than 120 days after the end of 

each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an installation energy report detailing 

the fulfillment during that fiscal year of the energy performance 

goals for the Department of Defense under section 2911 of this title. 

Each report shall contain the following:’’. 

SEC. 2827. REQUIREMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CAPTURE AND TRACK DATA GENERATED IN METERING DEPARTMENT FACILITIES. 

The Secretary of Defense shall require that the information generated by the installation energy meters be captured and tracked to 

determine baseline energy consumption and facilitate efforts to reduce energy consumption. 

SEC. 2828. METERING OF NAVY PIERS TO ACCURATELY MEASURE ENERGY CONSUMPTION. 

(a) METERING REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall 

meter Navy piers so that the energy consumption of naval vessels 

while in port can be accurately measured and captured and steps 

taken to improve the efficient use of energy by naval vessels while 

in port. 

(b) PROGRESS REPORTS.—In each of the Department of Defense 

energy management reports submitted to Congress during fiscal 

years 2012 through 2017 under section 2925(a) of title 10, United 

States Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall include information on 

the progress being made to implement the metering of Navy piers, 

including information on any reductions in energy consumption 

achieved through the use of such metering. 

SEC. 2829. TRAINING POLICY FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENERGY 

MANAGERS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF TRAINING POLICY.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a training policy for Department of Defense energy managers designated for military installations in order to— 

(1) improve the knowledge, skills, and abilities of energy 

managers by ensuring understanding of existing energy laws, 

regulations, mandates, contracting options, local renewable 

portfolio standards, current renewable energy technology options, energy auditing, and options to reduce energy consumption; 

(2) improve consistency among energy managers throughout 

the Department in the performance of their responsibilities; 

(3) create opportunities and forums for energy managers to 

exchange ideas and lessons learned within each military department, as well as across the Department of Defense; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
398 

(4) collaborate with the Department of Energy regarding 

energy manager training. 

(b) ISSUANCE OF POLICY.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

issue the training policy for Department of Defense energy managers. In creating the policy, the Secretary shall consider the best 

practices and certifications available in either the military services 

or in the private sector. 

(c) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, or designated representatives of the Secretary, shall brief the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the details of the energy manager policy. 

SEC. 2830. REPORT ON ENERGY-EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY 

AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN GOLD OR PLATINUM CERTIFICATION. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than June 30, 2012, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the energy-efficiency and sustainability 

standards utilized by the Department of Defense for military 

construction and repair. 

(2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall include a costbenefit analysis, return on investment, and long-term payback 

for the following design standards: 

(A) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and 

Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) building standard 

189.1-2011. 

(B) ASHRAE building standard 90.1-2010. 

(C) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 

(LEED) silver, gold, and platinum certification, as well as 

the LEED volume certification. 

(D) Other American National Standards Institute accredited standards. 

(3) ADDITIONAL CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall 

also include a copy of Department of Defense policy prescribing 

a comprehensive strategy for the pursuit of design and building 

standards across the Department that include specific energy-efficient standards and sustainable design attributes for military 

construction based on the cost-benefit analysis, return on investment, and demonstrated payback required by subparagraphs 

(A), (B), (C), and (D) of paragraph (2). 

(b) PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR LEED GOLD OR PLATINUM CERTIFICATION.— 

(1) PROHIBITION.—No funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of 

Defense for fiscal year 2012 may be obligated or expended for 

achieving any LEED gold or platinum certification. 

(2) WAIVER AND NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense 

may waive the limitation in paragraph (1) if the Secretary submits a notification to the congressional defense committees at 

least 30 days before the obligation of funds toward achieving 

the LEED gold or platinum certification. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
399 

(3) CONTENTS OF NOTIFICATION.—A notification shall include the following: 

(A) A cost-benefit analysis of the decision to obligate 

funds toward achieving the LEED gold or platinum certification. 

(B) Demonstrated payback for the energy improvements 

or sustainable design features. 

(4) EXCEPTION.—LEED gold and platinum certifications 

shall be permitted, and not require a waiver and notification 

under this subsection, if achieving such certification imposes no 

additional cost to the Department of Defense. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 

SEC. 2841. CERTIFICATION OF MEDICAL CARE COVERAGE FOR H–2B 

TEMPORARY WORKFORCE ON MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

PROJECTS ON GUAM. 

(a) MANAGEMENT OF WORKFORCE HEALTH CARE.—Subject to 

subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy may not award any additional Navy or Marine Corps construction project or associated task 

order on Guam associated with the Record of Decision for the Guam 

and CNMI Military Relocation dated September 2010 if the aggregate of the number of employees holding a visa described in section 

101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b); known as ‘‘H–2B workers’’) to support 

such relocation exceeds 2,000 until the Secretary of the Navy certifies to the congressional defense committees that a system of health 

care for the H–2B workers is available. 

(b) SYSTEM OF HEALTH CARE.—The health care system required 

to be certified in subsection (a) shall— 

(1) include a comprehensive medical plan for the H–2B 

workers; 

(2) include comprehensive planning and coordination with 

contractor-provided healthcare services and with Guam’s civilian and military healthcare community; and 

(3) access local healthcare assets to help meet the health 

care needs of the H–2B workers. 

(c) ELEMENTS OF MEDICAL PLAN.—The comprehensive medical 

plan referred to in subsection (b)(1) shall— 

(1) address significant health issues, injury, or series of injuries in addition to basic first responder medical services for 

H–2B workers; 

(2) provide pre-deployment health screening at the country 

of origin of H–2B workers, ensuring— 

(A) all major or chronic disease conditions of concern 

are identified; 

(B) proper immunizations are administered; 

(C) screening for tuberculosis and communicable diseases are conducted; and 

(D) all H–2B workers are fit and healthy for work prior 

to deployment; 

(3) provide that an arrival health screening process is developed to ensure the H–2B workers are fit to work and that the 

risk of spreading communicable diseases to the resident population is minimized; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
400 

(4) provide comprehensive on-site medical services, including emergency medical care for the H–2B workers, primary 

health care to include care for chronic diseases, preventive services and acute care delivery, and accessible prescription services 

maintaining oversight, authorization access, and delivery of 

prescription medications to the workforce. 

(d) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Secretary of the Navy to establish a United 

States Government-sponsored or funded health care system required 

to be certified in subsection (a) or to be responsible in any way for 

the administration of a health care system or plan or the provision 

of health care services for the H–2B workers identified in subsection 

(a). 

SEC. 2842. REPEAL OF CONDITION ON USE OF SPECIFIC UTILITY CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY REGARDING GUAM INTEGRATED 

WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. 

Section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 

4465) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 

SEC. 2851. LAND CONVEYANCE AND EXCHANGE, JOINT BASE ELMENDORF RICHARDSON, ALASKA. 

(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.— (1) MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE.—The Secretary of the Air 

Force may, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, 

convey to the Municipality of Anchorage (in this section referred 

to as the ‘‘Municipality’’) all right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to all or any part of a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 220 acres at JBER situated to the west of and adjacent to the Anchorage Regional Landfill in Anchorage, Alaska, for solid waste management purposes, including reclamation thereof, and for alternative energy production, and other 

related activities. This authority may not be exercised unless 

and until the March 15, 1982, North Anchorage Land Agreement is amended by the parties thereto to specifically permit the 

conveyance under this paragraph. 

(2) EKLUTNA, INC..—The Secretary of the Air Force may, in 

consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, upon terms mutually agreeable to the Secretary of the Air Force and Eklutna, 

Inc., an Alaska Native village corporation organized pursuant 

to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et 

seq.) (in this section referred to as ‘‘Eklutna’’), convey to Eklutna 

all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to all 

or any part of a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 130 acres situated 

on the northeast corner of the Glenn Highway and Boniface 

Parkway in Anchorage, Alaska, or such other property as may 

be identified in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, 

for any use compatible with JBER’s current and reasonably 

foreseeable mission as determined by the Secretary of the Air 

Force. 

(3) RIGHT TO WITHHOLD TRANSFER.—The Secretary may 

withhold transfer of any portion of the real property described 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
401 

in paragraphs (1) and (2) based on public interest or military 

mission requirements. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.— 

(1) MUNICIPALITY PROPERTY.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Air Force 

shall receive in-kind solid waste management services at the 

Anchorage Regional Landfill or such other consideration as determined satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least fair 

market value of the property conveyed. 

(2) EKLUTNA PROPERTY.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of the Air Force is 

authorized to receive, upon terms mutually agreeable to the Secretary and Eklutna, such interests in the surface estate of real 

property owned by Eklutna and situated at the northeast 

boundary of JBER and other consideration as considered satisfactory by the Secretary equal to at least fair market value of 

the property conveyed. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall require the Municipality and Eklutna to reimburse the 

Secretary to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to 

carry out the conveyances under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other 

administrative costs related to the conveyance. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by 

the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, 

and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or 

account. 

(d) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Any cash 

payment received by the United States as consideration for the conveyances under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established under subsection (b) of section 572 

of title 40, United States Code, and shall be available in accordance 

with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection. 

(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 

shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary. 

(f) OTHER OR ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyances under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2852. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, CAMP JOSEPH T. 

ROBINSON, ARKANSAS. 

Section 2852 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2685) 

is amended by striking ‘‘to be acquired by the United States of 

America’’ and inserting ‘‘to be acquired by the Military Department 

of Arkansas’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
402 

SEC. 2853. CLARIFICATION OF LAND CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY, CAMP 

CAITLIN AND OHANA NUI AREAS, HAWAII. 

Section 2856(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2689) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, before the property or portion thereof is made available 

for transfer pursuant to the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act 

(title II of Public Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other 

Federal agency, or for disposal under applicable laws’’. 

SEC. 2854. LAND EXCHANGE, FORT BLISS TEXAS. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—In exchange for the receipt of 

the real property described in subsection (b), the Secretary of the 

Army may convey to the Texas General Land Office (in this section 

referred to as the ‘‘TGLO’’) all right, title, and interest of the United 

States in and to a parcel of undeveloped real property consisting of 

approximately 694 acres at Fort Bliss, Texas, for the purpose of facilitating commercial development of the parcel. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the conveyance under 

subsection (a), TGLO shall convey to the Secretary of the Army all 

right, title, and interest of TGLO in and to a parcel of real property, 

including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 

2,880 acres adjacent to Fort Bliss training areas to facilitate tactical 

vehicle ingress and egress between the installation and the training 

areas and mitigate encroachment issues. If the fair market value of 

the real property to be acquired by the Secretary is less than the fair 

market value of the real property to be conveyed under subsection 

(a), the Secretary may require a cash equalization payment in an 

amount equal to the difference in value. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

require TGLO to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or 

to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, 

to carry out the land exchange under this section, including 

survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and 

other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts 

are collected from TGLO in advance of the Secretary incurring 

the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the land exchange, 

the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to TGLO. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursements under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the 

Secretary in carrying out the land exchange. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and 

shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or 

account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the real property to be exchanged under this section 

shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the 

Army. 

(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the land exchange under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
403 

SEC. 2855. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER DEFENSE DEPOT OGDEN, 

UTAH. 

(a) CONVEYANCE OF RESIDUAL INTERESTS.—To facilitate the 

conveyance of a parcel of real property consisting of approximately 

2.73 acres at the former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah (in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘Property’’), from the Weber Basin Disabled Corporation to the Ogden City Redevelopment Authority (in 

this section referred to as the ‘‘Redevelopment Authority’’), the Secretary of the Army may accept a request to revert the Property from 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The Secretary of the 

Army may further convey, by quit claim deed, all residual right, 

title, and interest of the United States (including reversionary interests) in and to the Property for the purpose of permitting the Redevelopment Authority to take immediate steps to prevent the further 

deterioration of the building on the parcel and subsequently redevelop the parcel. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the conveyance of residual United States interests in the property described in subsection (a), the Redevelopment Authority shall pay an amount equal 

to the fair market value of the conveyed interests, as determined by 

the Secretary of the Army. Amounts received under this subsection 

shall be deposited in the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. The amounts deposited shall be merged with other 

amounts in such fund and be available for the same purposes, and 

subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such 

fund. 

(c) PAYMENT OR COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall require 

the Redevelopment Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the 

Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by 

the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), 

including costs related to environmental documentation and 

other administrative costs. If amounts are collected from the Redevelopment Authority in advance of the Secretary of the Army 

incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the 

costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Redevelopment Authority. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursements under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred in 

carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be 

merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be 

available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 

shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the 

Army. 

(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
404 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 2861. REDESIGNATION OF INDUSTRIAL COLLEGE OF THE ARMED 

FORCES AS THE DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER SCHOOL FOR 

NATIONAL SECURITY AND RESOURCE STRATEGY. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The Industrial College of the Armed 

Forces is hereby renamed the ‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of section 

2165(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(2) The Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy.’’. 

(c) REFERENCES.—Any reference to the Industrial College of the 

Armed Forces in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 

other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy. 

SEC. 2862. REDESIGNATION OF MIKE O’CALLAGHAN FEDERAL HOSPITAL IN NEVADA AS MIKE O’CALLAGHAN FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 2867 of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 

104–201; 110 Stat. 2806), as amended by section 8135(a) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1997 (section 101(b) of division A of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997 

(Public Law 104–208; 110 Stat. 3009–118)), is further amended by 

striking ‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center’’. 

SEC. 2863. PROHIBITION ON NAMING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REAL 

PROPERTY AFTER A MEMBER OF CONGRESS. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—Section 2661 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) PROHIBITION ON NAMING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REAL

PROPERTY AFTER MEMBER OF CONGRESS.—(1) Real property under 

the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a 

military department may not be named after, or otherwise officially 

identified by the name of, any individual who is a Member of Congress at the time the property is so named or identified. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection: 

‘‘(A) The term ‘Member of Congress’ includes a Delegate or 

Resident Commissioner to the Congress. 

‘‘(B) The term ‘real property’ includes structures, buildings, 

or other infrastructure of a military installation, roadways and 

defense access roads, and any other area on the grounds of a 

military installation.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The prohibition in subsection (c) of section 2661 of title 10, United States Code, as added 

by subsection (a), shall apply only with respect to real property of 

the Department of Defense named after the date of the enactment of 

this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
405 

SEC. 2864. NOTIFICATIONS OF REDUCTIONS IN NUMBER OF MEMBERS 

OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED TO PERMANENT DUTY 

AT A MILITARY INSTALLATION. 

(a) NOTICE AND WAIT LIMITATION.—Chapter 50 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 992 the 

following new section: 

‘‘§ 993. Notification of permanent reduction of sizable numbers of members of the armed forces 

‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary 

of the military department concerned shall notify Congress under 

subsection (b) of a plan to reduce more than 1,000 members of the 

armed forces assigned at a military installation. 

‘‘(b) NOTICE REQUIREMENTS.—No irrevocable action may be 

taken to effect or implement a reduction described under subsection 

(a) until— 

‘‘(1) the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military 

department concerned notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the proposed reduction and the number of personnel assignments affected; 

‘‘(2) submits a justification for the reduction and an evaluation of the local strategic and operational impact of such reduction; and 

‘‘(3) a period of 21 days has expired following submission 

of the notice and evaluation required under this subsection, or 

if sooner, a period of 14 days has expired following the date on 

which an electronic version of the notice and justification has 

been submitted to such committees. 

‘‘(c) EXCEPTIONS.— ‘‘(1) BASE CLOSURE PROCESS.—Subsections (a) and (b) do 

not apply in the case of the realignment of a military installation pursuant to a base closure law. 

‘‘(2) NATIONAL SECURITY OR EMERGENCY.—Subsections (a) 

and (b) do not apply if the President certifies to Congress that 

the reduction in military personnel at a military installation 

must be implemented for reasons of national security or a military emergency.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 

new item: 

‘‘993. Notification of permanent reduction of sizable numbers of members of the 

armed forces.’’. 

SEC. 2865. INVESTMENT PLAN FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF PUBLIC 

SHIPYARDS UNDER JURISDICTION OF DEPARTMENT OF 

THE NAVY. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than September 1, 2012, the 

Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to address the facilities and infrastructure requirements at each public shipyard under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. 

(b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 

include the following elements: 

(1) A description of the operations and support required at 

each public shipyard under the control of the Secretary, including the location, year constructed, the classes of ships serviced, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
406 

number of personnel assigned, and the average age of facilities 

at each location. 

(2) A review of all workload requirements in the past 5 

years, an assessment of the efficiency in the use of existing facilities to meet the workload, and an estimate of the workload 

planned for each public shipyard through the current futureyears defense program under section 221 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

(3) An assessment of the adequacy of each facility— 

(A) to carry out efficient depot-level ship maintenance 

with modern technology and equipment; 

(B) to ensure workplace safety; 

(C) to support nuclear-related activities (where applicable); 

(D) to maintain the quality of life of the workforce; and 

(E) to meet the energy savings goals of the Secretary of 

the Navy for military installations. 

(4) An assessment of the existing condition of each facility 

at each public shipyard to include a review of existing and projected deficiencies or inadequate conditions at each facility, and 

whether any of the facilities listed are temporary structures. 

(5) A description and cost estimate for each project to improve, repair, renovate, or modernize facilities or infrastructure. 

(6) A description of the facility improvements or new construction projects at each public shipyard that would improve 

the efficiency of the facility’s operations or generate energy savings based upon a business case analysis. 

(7) An investment strategy planned for each public shipyard to correct deficiencies identified in paragraph (4), including timelines to complete each project and cost estimates and 

timelines necessary to complete the projects identified in paragraph (6). 

(8) A list of projects, costs, and timelines through the future-years defense program to meet the requirements of the minimum capital investment percentage required under section 

2476 of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 2866. REPORT ON THE HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on 

the Homeowners Assistance Program under the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 3374). The 

report shall include the following: 

(1) The estimated cost if eligibility were expanded to include permanent change of station applicants who purchased a 

home after July 1, 2006, and before July 1, 2008. 

(2) The estimated cost if eligibility were expanded to include members of the Armed Forces under paragraph (1) and 

permanent change of station applicants who received permanent 

change of station orders after September 30, 2010, and before 

September 30, 2011. 

(3) The estimated number of members of the Armed Forces 

who received permanent change of station orders after September 30, 2010, and before September 30, 2011, and who suffered a decline of at least a 10 percent in home value from the 

date of purchase to the date of sale. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
407 

SEC. 2867. DATA SERVERS AND CENTERS. 

(a) LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.— 

(1) LIMITATIONS.— 

(A) BEFORE PERFORMANCE PLAN.—During the period 

beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on May 1, 2012, a department, agency, or component of 

the Department of Defense may not obligate funds for a 

data server farm or data center unless approved by the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense or 

the Chief Information Officer of a component of the Department to whom the Chief Information Officer of the Department has specifically delegated such approval authority. 

(B) UNDER PERFORMANCE PLAN.—After May 1, 2012, a 

department, agency, or component of the Department may 

not obligate funds for a data center, or any information 

systems technology used therein, unless that obligation is in 

accordance with the performance plan required by subsection (b) and is approved as described in subparagraph 

(A). 

(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVALS.— 

(A) BEFORE PERFORMANCE PLAN.—An approval of the 

obligation of funds may not be granted under paragraph 

(1)(A) unless the official granting the approval determines, 

in writing, that existing resources of the agency, component, 

or element concerned cannot affordably or practically be 

used or modified to meet the requirements to be met 

through the obligation of funds. 

(B) UNDER PERFORMANCE PLAN.—An approval of the 

obligation of funds may not be granted under paragraph 

(1)(B) unless the official granting the approval determines 

that— 

(i) existing resources of the Department do not 

meet the operation requirements to be met through the 

obligation of funds; and 

(ii) the proposed obligation is in accordance with 

the performance standards and measures established 

by the Chief Information Officer of the Department 

under subsection (b). 

(3) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each 

calendar quarter, each Chief Information Officer of a component of the Department who grants an approval under paragraph (1) during such calendar quarter shall submit to the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department a report on the approval or approvals so granted during such calendar quarter. 

(b) PERFORMANCE PLAN FOR REDUCTION OF RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR DATA SERVERS AND CENTERS.— 

(1) COMPONENT PLANS.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 15, 2012, the 

Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of 

the Defense Agencies shall each submit to the Chief Information Officer of the Department a plan for the department 

or agency concerned to achieve the following: 

(i) A reduction in the square feet of floor space devoted to information systems technologies, attendant 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
408 

support technologies, and operations within data centers. 

(ii) A reduction in the use of all utilities necessary 

to power and cool information systems technologies 

and data centers. 

(iii) An increase in multi-organizational utilization 

of data centers, information systems technologies, and 

associated resources. 

(iv) A reduction in the investment for capital infrastructure or equipment required to support data centers 

as measured in cost per megawatt of data storage. 

(v) A reduction in the number of commercial and 

government developed applications running on data 

servers and within data centers. 

(vi) A reduction in the number of government and 

vendor provided full-time equivalent personnel, and in 

the cost of labor, associated with the operation of data 

servers and data centers. 

(B) SPECIFICATION OF REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—The 

Chief Information Officer of the Department shall specify 

the particular performance standards and measures and 

implementation elements to be included in the plans submitted under this paragraph, including specific goals and 

schedules for achieving the matters specified in subparagraph (A). 

(2) DEFENSE-WIDE PLAN.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 2012, the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a performance plan 

for a reduction in the resources required for data centers 

and information systems technologies Department-wide. 

The plan shall be based upon and incorporate appropriate 

elements of the plans submitted under paragraph (1). 

(B) ELEMENTS.—The performance plan required under 

this paragraph shall include the following: 

(i) A Department-wide performance plan for 

achieving the matters specified in paragraph (1)(A), including performance standards and measures for data 

centers and information systems technologies, goals 

and schedules for achieving such matters, and an estimate of cost savings anticipated through implementation of the plan. 

(ii) A Department-wide strategy for each of the following: 

(I) Desktop, laptop, and mobile device 

virtualization. 

(II) Transitioning to cloud computing. 

(III) Migration of Defense data and government-provided services from Department-owned 

and operated data centers to cloud computing services generally available within the private sector 

that provide a better capability at a lower cost 

with the same or greater degree of security. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
409 

(IV) Utilization of private sector-managed security services for data centers and cloud computing services. 

(V) A finite set of metrics to accurately and 

transparently report on data center infrastructure 

(space, power and cooling): age, cost, capacity, 

usage, energy efficiency and utilization, accompanied with the aggregate data for each data center site in use by the Department in excess of 100 

kilowatts of information technology power demand. 

(VI) Transitioning to just-in-time delivery of 

Department-owned data center infrastructure 

(space, power and cooling) through use of modular 

data center technology and integrated data center 

infrastructure management software. 

(3) RESPONSIBILITY.—The Chief Information Officer of the 

Department shall discharge the responsibility for establishing 

performance standards and measures for data centers and information systems technologies for purposes of this subsection. 

Such responsibility may not be delegated. 

(c) EXCEPTION.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department and the Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence Community may jointly exempt from the applicability of this section such 

intelligence components of the Department of Defense (and the programs and activities thereof) that are funded through the National 

Intelligence Program (NIP) as the Chief Information Officers consider appropriate. 

(d) REPORTS ON COST SAVINGS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of each fiscal 

year, and ending in fiscal year 2016, the Chief Information Officer of the Department shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the cost savings, cost reductions, 

cost avoidances, and performance gains achieved, and anticipated to be achieved, as of the date of such report as a result 

of activities undertaken under this section. 

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
410 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Limitation on availability of funds for establishment of centers of excellence on nuclear security outside of the former Soviet Union. 

Sec. 3112. Aircraft procurement. 

Sec. 3113. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms. 

Sec. 3114. Recognition and status of National Atomic Testing Museum. 

Subtitle C—Reports 

Sec. 3121. Repeal of certain report requirements. 

Sec. 3122. Progress on nuclear nonproliferation. 

Sec. 3123. Reports on role of nuclear security complex sites and potential efficiencies. 

Sec. 3124. Net assessment of high-performance computing capabilities of foreign 

countries. 

Sec. 3125. Review and analysis of nuclear waste reprocessing and nuclear reactor 

technology. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3131. Sense of Congress on the use of savings from excess amounts for certain 

pension plan contributions. 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal 

year 2012 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table 

in section 4701. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF NEW PLANT PROJECT.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant 

projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out the following new 

plant project for the National Nuclear Security Administration: 

Project 12–D–301, Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facilities, 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 

$9,881,000. 

SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2012 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding 

table in section 4701. 

SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2012 for other defense activities in 

carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 

4701. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and 

Limitations 

SEC. 3111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE ON NUCLEAR SECURITY OUTSIDE OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the 

National Nuclear Security Administration, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended to establish a center of excellence 

on nuclear security in a country that is not a state of the former Soviet Union until the date on which the Secretary of Energy submits 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
411 

to the appropriate congressional committees the report under subsection (b). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, submit to the appropriate 

congressional committees a report that includes the following: 

(1) An identification of the country in which a center of excellence established under subsection (a) will be located. 

(2) A description of the purpose for which the center will be 

established and the existing capacity of the country in which 

the center will be located to develop and implement best practices for training for nuclear security. 

(3) The extent to which the training and relationship-building activities planned for the center could contribute to improving the historic pattern of the country in which the center will 

be located with respect to the proliferation of weapons of mass 

destruction and missiles. 

(4) The agreement under which the center will operate. 

(5) A funding plan for the center, including— 

(A) the amount of funds to be provided by the government of the country in which the center will be located; and 

(B) the percentage of the total cost of establishing and 

operating the center the funds described in subparagraph 

(A) will cover. 

(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate. 

SEC. 3112. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT. 

Using amounts authorized to be appropriated and made available for obligation under section 3101 for weapons activities for any 

fiscal year before fiscal year 2013, the Secretary of Energy may procure not more than one aircraft. 

SEC. 3113. HANFORD WASTE TANK CLEANUP PROGRAM REFORMS. 

Section 4442 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2622) 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘, consistent with the 

policy direction established by the Department, all aspects of 

the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington’’ and inserting ‘‘all aspects of the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington, including Hanford Tank Farm operations and the 

Waste Treatment Plant’’; 

(2) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: 

‘‘(d) NOTIFICATION.—The Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management shall submit to the Committee on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the 

House of Representatives written notification detailing any changes 

in the roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships that involve the Office.’’; and 

(3) by striking subsections (e) and (f) and inserting the following new subsection: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
412 

‘‘(e) TERMINATION.—The Office shall terminate on September 

30, 2019. The Office may be extended beyond that date if the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management determines 

in writing that termination would disrupt effective management of 

the Hanford Tank Farm operations.’’. 

SEC. 3114. RECOGNITION AND STATUS OF NATIONAL ATOMIC TESTING 

MUSEUM. 

Section 3137 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (42 U.S.C. 7142) is amended— 

(1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘AND NATIONAL 

ATOMIC TESTING MUSEUM’’ after ‘‘ATOMIC MUSEUM’’; 

and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) RECOGNITION AND STATUS OF NATIONAL ATOMIC TESTING

MUSEUM.—The museum operated by the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation and located in Las Vegas, Nevada— 

‘‘(1) is recognized as the official atomic testing museum of 

the United States; and 

‘‘(2) shall be known as the ‘National Atomic Testing Museum’.’’. 

Subtitle C—Reports 

SEC. 3121. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORT REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) REPEAL OF REPORT REQUIREMENT FOR NUCLEAR CITIES INITIATIVE PROGRAM.—Section 3132 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1366) 

is repealed. 

(b) REMOVAL OF REPORT REQUIREMENT FOR NONPROLIFERATION INITIATIVE PROGRAM.—Paragraph (6) of section 4302(a) of the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2562(a)) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(6) Funds appropriated for the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention program may not be used to pay any tax or customs duty 

levied by the government of the Russian Federation. In the event 

payment of such a tax or customs duty with such funds is unavoidable, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that sufficient additional 

funds are provided to the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention 

Program to offset the amount of such payment.’’. 

SEC. 3122. PROGRESS ON NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the spread of nuclear and radiological weapons, or 

weapons-usable material, technology, equipment, information, 

and expertise, poses a short- and long-term threat to the security of the United States; and 

(2) the nonproliferation efforts of the United States should 

prioritize the programs which most directly address such 

threat. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter by not later than 

March 1 of each year through 2016, the Secretary of Energy 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the strategic plans of the Department of Energy and the 

National Nuclear Security Administration to prevent the proVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00442 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
413 

liferation of materials, technology, equipment, and expertise related to nuclear and radiological weapons in order to minimize 

the risk of nuclear terrorism and the proliferation of such weapons. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—Each report under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) Progress and challenges in implementing the strategic plans described in paragraph (1), including— 

(i) preventing nuclear terrorism by securing and 

removing highly-enriched uranium and plutonium 

worldwide; 

(ii) converting reactors from highly-enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium in the Russian Federation and other countries; 

(iii) providing radiation detection capability at 

ports and borders; 

(iv) securing and removing radiological materials 

worldwide; 

(v) developing and improving technology to— 

(I) detect the proliferation and detonation of 

nuclear weapons; 

(II) verify foreign commitments to treaties and 

agreements with respect to nuclear weapons; and 

(III) detect the diversion of nuclear materials, 

including safeguard technology; 

(vi) preventing and countering the proliferation 

and use of nuclear weapons (including materials, technology, and expertise related to such weapons), including through safeguards, export controls, international 

regimes, treaties, and agreements; 

(vii) disposing of surplus material of both the 

United States and Russia; and 

(viii) preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons expertise. 

(B) An estimate of the budget requirements of the National Nuclear Security Administration, including the costs 

associated with the implementation of the strategic plans 

described in paragraph (1) over the 5-year period following 

the date of the report. 

(C) A discussion of the coordination of the programs of 

the National Nuclear Security Administration with other 

offices of the Department of Energy and with other agencies 

and offices of the Federal Government with respect to implementing the strategic plans described in paragraph (1). 

(c) ANNUAL ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter by not 

later than March 1 of each year through 2016, the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the Department of Energy, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment containing the following: 

(1) An assessment of the risk that non-nuclear weapons 

states may acquire nuclear enrichment or reprocessing technology. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
414 

(2) A list, by country and site, reflecting the total amount 

of known highly-enriched uranium around the world, and an 

assessment of the vulnerability of such uranium to theft or diversion. 

(d) FORM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), 

each report and assessment under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(2) LIST.—Each list under subsection (c)(2) may be in classified form if the Secretary determines it necessary. 

(e) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 

House of Representatives; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate. 

SEC. 3123. REPORTS ON ROLE OF NUCLEAR SECURITY COMPLEX SITES 

AND POTENTIAL EFFICIENCIES. 

(a) NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2013, the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— 

(A) assessing the role of the nuclear security complex 

sites in supporting— 

(i) a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent; 

(ii) reductions in the nuclear stockpile; and 

(iii) the nuclear nonproliferation efforts of the 

United States; and 

(B) identifying any opportunities for efficiencies and 

cost savings within the nuclear security complex. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the role of the nuclear security 

complex sites, including the national security laboratories, 

in— 

(i) maintaining a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear 

deterrent; 

(ii) supporting reductions in the nuclear stockpile; 

and 

(iii) supporting the nuclear nonproliferation efforts 

of the United States, including improving verification 

and detection technology. 

(B) An identification of any opportunities for efficiencies within the nuclear security complex and an assessment of how those efficiencies could contribute to cost savings and strengthening safety and security. 

(C) An assessment of duplicative functions within the 

nuclear security complex and a description of which duplicative functions remain necessary and why. 

(D) If the Administrator determines it appropriate, an 

analysis of the potential for shared use or development of 

high explosives research and development capacity, superVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00444 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
415 

computing platforms, and infrastructure maintained for 

Work for Others programs. 

(E) A description of the long-term strategic plan for the 

nuclear security complex. 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the report under subsection (a)(1) is submitted, the Comptroller 

General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the report submitted by the Administrator for Nuclear Security under subsection (a). 

(c) FORM.—The reports required by subsections (a) and (b) shall 

be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(d) NUCLEAR SECURITY COMPLEX DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘nuclear security complex’’ means the facilities and laboratories specified in section 4102(g) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2512(g)). 

SEC. 3124. NET ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CAPABILITIES OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary 

of Energy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Secretary of Commerce, shall conduct a net assessment of the high-performance computing capability possessed by foreign countries. 

(b) MATTERS COVERED.—The assessment required by subsection 

(a) shall include— 

(1) an analysis of current and expected future capabilities 

and trends with respect to high-performance computing in the 

United States and in other countries; 

(2) a description of how high-performance computing technology is being used by various countries as compared to the 

United States; 

(3) an evaluation of the similarities and differences in approaches to the innovation, development, and use of high-performance computing among the United States and countries 

with the most experience, capabilities, or skill with respect to 

high-performance computing; 

(4) estimates of the current and expected future effects of 

high-performance computing technology on the national security 

and economic growth of various countries; 

(5) recommendations on actions to take to ensure the continued leadership by the United States in high-performance 

computing and ways to better leverage such technology for innovation, economic growth, and national security; and 

(6) such other matters as the Director of National Intelligence considers appropriate. 

(c) COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES.—The Director of National Intelligence shall coordinate the assessment required by subsection (a) with other departments or agencies of the Federal Government as the Director considers appropriate. 

(d) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of the assessment required by subsection (a). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
416 

(2) FORM.—The report required under this section shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this 

subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 3125. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR WASTE REPROCESSING AND NUCLEAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY. 

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Energy, in consultation 

with the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Secretary of 

Defense, as needed, shall conduct a study on waste reprocessing and 

Generation IV nuclear reactor technology. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The study required under subsection (a) shall 

include— 

(1) a review of previous studies conducted by the Department of Energy and the National Academy of Sciences related 

to the subject of nuclear waste reprocessing and the use of 

mixed oxide fuel in nuclear reactors, including Generation IV 

reactors, as a point of reference; 

(2) a determination of the waste streams resulting from reprocessing and the use of mixed oxide fuel; 

(3) an analysis of the nuclear proliferation risks of reprocessing and using mixed oxide fuel in nuclear reactors, including 

effects on the nuclear nonproliferation efforts of the United 

States; 

(4) a comparison of the costs and proliferation risks of nuclear waste reprocessing technologies used in other countries 

and a comparison to the costs and risks of direct disposal of nuclear waste; and 

(5) an analysis, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, of the feasibility of deploying proven Generation IV reactors or other nuclear technology that could use mixed oxide fuel 

at military installations. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit 

to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the 

study required under subsection (a). 

(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this 

subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
417 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

SEC. 3131. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE USE OF SAVINGS FROM EXCESS AMOUNTS FOR CERTAIN PENSION PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the employee pension plans maintained by the management and operating contractors managing the national laboratories, plants, and other facilities of the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Office of Environmental Management of the Department of Energy should be fully funded to ensure that pension commitments made to the highly skilled scientists, engineers, and other employees of the nuclear enterprise 

are kept; and 

(2) if economic conditions improve, or efficiencies are identified, so that amounts appropriated for contributions to those 

pension plans exceed the amounts required by law for those contributions, the Administrator for Nuclear Security or the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management should 

promptly obligate or expend the excess amounts on high priority 

mission activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration or the Office of Environmental Management, as the case 

may be. 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY 

BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION. 

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2012, 

$29,130,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

(a) AMOUNT.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated 

to the Secretary of Energy $14,909,000 for fiscal year 2012 for the 

purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, 

United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. 

(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 

the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain 

available until expended. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the merchant marine for fiscal year 2012. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
418 

Sec. 3502. Use of National Defense Reserve Fleet and Ready Reserve Force vessels. 

Sec. 3503. Recruitment authority. 

Sec. 3504. Ship scrapping reporting requirement. 

SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2012. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2012, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in 

the appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows: 

(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United 

States Merchant Marine Academy, $93,068,000, of which— 

(A) $64,183,000 shall remain available until expended 

for Academy operations; and 

(B) $28,885,000 shall remain available until expended 

for capital asset management at the Academy. 

(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime 

academies, $17,100,000, of which— 

(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended 

for student incentive payments; 

(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended 

for direct payments to such academies; and 

(C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended 

for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy 

training vessels. 

(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $18,500,000, to remain available 

until expended. 

(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United Statesflag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the 

United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, 

$186,000,000. 

(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 

Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 6661a(5)) of loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, 

United States Code, $14,260,000, of which $3,740,000 shall remain available until expended for administrative expenses of 

the program. 

SEC. 3502. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET AND READY 

RESERVE FORCE VESSELS. 

Section 11 of the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946 (50 U.S.C. 

App. 1744(b)) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘or’’ after the semicolon at 

the end of paragraph (4), striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) for civil contingency operations and Maritime Administration promotional and media events, in accordance with subsection (f).’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) USE OF NDRF VESSELS FOR CIVIL CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS AND PROMOTIONAL AND MEDIA EVENTS.—With the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation 

may allow the use of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
419 

(NDRF) for civil contingency operations requested by another Federal agency, and for Maritime Administration promotional and 

media events relating to demonstration projects and research and 

development supporting the Administration’s mission, if the Secretary of Transportation determines such use is in the best interest 

of the Government after considering the following factors: 

‘‘(1) AVAILABILITY.—The availability of NDRF or Ready Reserve Force (RRF) resources and the impact of such use on 

NDRF and RRF mission support to the defense and homeland 

security requirements of the Government. 

‘‘(2) INTERFERENCE.—Whether the such use of vessels will 

support the mission of the Maritime Administration and not 

significantly interfere with NDRF vessel maintenance, repair, 

safety, readiness, and resource availability. 

‘‘(3) SAFETY.—Whether safety precautions will be taken, including indemnification of liability when applicable. 

‘‘(4) COST.—Whether any costs incurred by such use will be 

funded as a reimbursable transaction between Federal agencies, 

as applicable. 

‘‘(5) OTHER MATTERS.—Any other matters the Maritime Administrator considers appropriate.’’. 

SEC. 3503. RECRUITMENT AUTHORITY. 

Section 51301 of title 46, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before the first sentence; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) RECRUITMENT.—The Secretary of Transportation may, subject to the availability of appropriations, expend funds available for 

United States Merchant Marine Academy operating expenses for recruiting activities, including advertising, in order to obtain recruits 

for the Academy and cadet applicants.’’. 

SEC. 3504. SHIP SCRAPPING REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

Section 3502(f) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, as amended by section 3505(a) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (119 

Stat. 3551), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(f) BRIEFINGS.—The Maritime Administrator shall, upon request, provide briefings to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Natural Resources, and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, and the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the 

Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, on the progress made 

in recycling vessels, problems encountered with recycling vessels, 

issues relating to vessel recycling, and other issues relating to vessel 

recycling and disposal.’’. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
420 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs. 

SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Whenever a funding table in this division 

specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount 

for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to 

the availability of appropriations. 

(b) MERIT-BASED DECISIONS.—A decision to commit, obligate, or 

expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar 

amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 

10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and 

(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. 

(c) RELATIONSHIP TO TRANSFER AND PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division 

may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or 

by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified 

in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such 

transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of 

this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. 

(d) APPLICABILITY TO CLASSIFIED ANNEX.—This section applies 

to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. 

(e) ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.—No oral or written 

communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 14,572 14,572 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
421 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ..................................... 539,574 0 

Early to Need ............................................................................... [–433,574 ] 

Program Decrease ........................................................................ [–106,000 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 658,798 0 

Transfer to OCO .......................................................................... [–550,798 ] 

Unjustified production ramp ...................................................... [–108,000 ] 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) ................................................................................. 70,762 70,762 

ROTARY 

007 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ......................................... 250,415 250,415 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ............................................ 411,005 368,505 

Army offered program reduction ................................................ [–42,500 ] 

010 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 192,764 192,764 

011 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 104,263 104,263 

012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ......................................... 1,325,666 1,317,666 

Unjustified program management growth ................................. [–8,000 ] 

013 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 199,781 199,781 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER ........................................................................ 1,305,360 1,239,360 

Army requested transfer to APA Line 15 for correct execution [–66,000 ] 

015 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 54,956 120,956 

Army requested transfer from APA Line 14 for correct execution.[66,000 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

019 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS ..................................................................... 136,183 0 

Transfer to OCO .......................................................................... [–136,183 ] 

021 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ............................................................... 27,575 27,575 

022 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ............................................. 8,362 8,362 

023 AH–64 MODS ...................................................................................... 331,230 331,230 

024 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ................................. 79,712 57,012 

Cargo and ballistic protection contract delays .......................... [–22,700 ] 

025 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS ............................................. 22,107 12,107 

Contract delays ............................................................................ [–10,000 ] 

027 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS ....................................................... 80,745 74,745 

Contract delays ............................................................................ [–6,000 ] 

028 KIOWA WARRIOR ............................................................................. 162,052 92,552 

Cockpit and Sensor Upgrade Program ahead of need .............. [–69,500 ] 

030 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN ................................................... 138,832 136,432 

Aviation Data Exploitation Capability ahead of need .............. [–2,400 ] 

031 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ..................................................... 132,855 117,855 

JTRS Integration ahead of need ................................................ [–15,000 ] 

032 GATM ROLLUP .................................................................................. 105,519 105,519 

033 RQ–7 UAV MODS .............................................................................. 126,239 76,239 

Administration recommendation ................................................ [–50,000 ] 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

035 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................. 35,993 35,993 

037 CMWS .................................................................................................. 162,811 104,251 

Production and installation contract delays .............................. [–58,560 ] 

OTHER SUPPORT 

038 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 4,840 4,840 

039 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 176,212 114,517 

Aviation Light Utility Mobile Maintenance (ALUMMC) no 

longer required.

[–3,287 ] 

Aviation Sets, Kits, Outfits, Tools contract delay ...................... [–58,408 ] 

040 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .............................................. 82,883 62,746 

Air Soldier System early to need ................................................ [–20,137 ] 

041 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ................................................................. 114,844 114,844 

042 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............................................................. 1,593 1,593 

043 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .............................................................. 2,878 2,878 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................. 7,061,381 5,360,334 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

001 PATRIOT SYSTEM SUMMARY ....................................................... 662,231 662,231 

002 MSE MISSILE/PAC–3 ...................................................................... 74,953 74,953 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
422 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

004 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 1,410 1,410 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

005 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................... 160,767 160,767 

006 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ............................................................ 61,676 58,676 

Unit cost efficiencies .................................................................... [–3,000 ] 

007 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 19,886 19,886 

009 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 314,167 314,167 

010 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......... 18,175 18,175 

011 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS .... 31,674 31,674 

MODIFICATIONS 

012 PATRIOT MODS ................................................................................ 66,925 66,925 

013 STINGER MODS ................................................................................ 14,495 0 

Procurement early to need ........................................................... [–4,495 ] 

Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 23801A .......... [–10,000 ] 

014 ITAS/TOW MODS ............................................................................. 13,577 13,577 

015 MLRS MODS ...................................................................................... 8,236 8,236 

016 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS ............................................................. 11,670 11,670 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

018 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 8,700 8,700 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

019 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ................................................................ 3,674 3,674 

020 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ........................................ 1,459 1,459 

021 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ..................................................... 5,043 5,043 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................... 1,478,718 1,461,223 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ......................................................................... 632,994 606,894 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–26,100 ] 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

005 STRYKER (MOD) ............................................................................... 52,797 51,497 

Excess program management ...................................................... [–1,300 ] 

006 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ...................................................................... 43,962 35,082 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–8,880 ] 

007 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .......................................................... 250,710 250,710 

008 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ........................ 46,876 46,876 

009 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) .......... 10,452 7,452 

Excess contractor engineering ..................................................... [–3,000 ] 

010 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE ................................................... 99,904 97,004 

Unjustified growth in matrix support and engineering change 

proposals.

[–2,900 ] 

011 M88 FOV MODS ................................................................................. 32,483 32,483 

013 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .............................................................. 160,578 131,178 

Unjustified technical support costs ............................................. [–29,400 ] 

014 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM ..................................................... 181,329 436,329 

Program increase to add 49 tanks to bridge production gap ... [255,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

015 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) .............................. 1,073 1,073 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

017 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY ........... 16,046 0 

Transfer at Army’s request to RDTE, Army PE 64601A .......... [–16,046 ] 

019 MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL ............................................... 65,102 0 

Transfer at Army request to WTCV line 34 ............................... [–34,000 ] 

Transfer to OCO .......................................................................... [–31,102 ] 

020 LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN ............................ 28,796 13,930 

Army revised lower quantity ....................................................... [–13,166 ] 

Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 64601A .......... [–1,700 ] 

023 MORTAR SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 12,477 10,177 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–2,300 ] 

025 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ........................ 12,055 12,055 

027 M4 CARBINE ...................................................................................... 35,015 35,015 

028 SHOTGUN, MODULAR ACCESSORY SYSTEM (MASS) ............. 6,707 6,707 

031 HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) ........................................................ 13,066 13,066 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
423 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

033 M4 CARBINE MODS ......................................................................... 25,092 25,092 

034 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 14,856 48,856 

Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 19 .......................... [34,000 ] 

035 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 8,480 8,480 

036 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................ 15,718 15,718 

037 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ............................................... 1,994 1,994 

038 M119 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................... 38,701 38,701 

039 M16 RIFLE MODS ............................................................................. 3,476 3,476 

041 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ................ 2,973 2,973 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

043 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) .......................... 10,080 10,080 

044 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ..................................................... 424 424 

045 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ................. 2,453 2,453 

SPARES 

046 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (WTCV) ......................................... 106,843 106,843 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY ................ 1,933,512 2,052,618 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

001 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 210,758 210,758 

002 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 83,730 83,730 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 9,064 7,064 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–2,000 ] 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 131,775 131,775 

007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 14,894 13,694 

Prior year funds available .......................................................... [–1,200 ] 

008 OBJECTIVE FAMILY OF WEAPONS AMMUNITION, ALL T .... 3,399 0 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–3,399 ] 

009 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 118,966 105,966 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–13,000 ] 

010 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 84,799 82,599 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–2,200 ] 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

012 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 31,287 31,287 

013 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 12,187 12,187 

014 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 108,416 106,916 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–1,500 ] 

TANK AMMUNITION 

015 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES .......... 105,704 65,205 

Pricing adjustment ...................................................................... [–40,000 ] 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–499 ] 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

017 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM AND 105MM, ALL TYP ....... 103,227 103,227 

019 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ........................ 32,887 32,887 

020 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 ................................... 69,074 58,074 

Program restructure .................................................................... [–11,000 ] 

021 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ...... 48,205 46,705 

Pricing adjustment ...................................................................... [–1,500 ] 

MINES 

023 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES ............................ 2,518 2,518 

NETWORKED MUNITIONS 

025 SPIDER NETWORK MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ........................... 43,123 43,123 

ROCKETS 

027 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................. 19,254 17,854 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–1,400 ] 

028 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 127,265 123,865 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–3,400 ] 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

029 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 53,685 38,685 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–15,000 ] 

030 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 42,558 42,558 

031 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 26,173 26,173 

032 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ............................................................. 14,108 14,108 

033 ALL OTHER (AMMO) ........................................................................ 50 50 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
424 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

MISCELLANEOUS 

034 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .............................................. 18,296 18,296 

035 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES .................................. 14,864 14,864 

036 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 5,449 5,449 

037 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 11,009 11,009 

038 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT ...................................... 24,200 24,200 

039 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................. 13,711 13,711 

040 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES ................................................................ 103 0 

Prior year funds available .......................................................... [–103 ] 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

041 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................. 199,841 199,841 

042 LAYAWAY OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ..................................... 9,451 9,451 

043 MAINTENANCE OF INACTIVE FACILITIES ............................... 5,533 5,533 

044 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL ...... 189,789 177,789 

Contract award delay .................................................................. [–12,000 ] 

045 ARMS INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 3,273 3,273 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .... 1,992,625 1,884,424 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ........................................................... 13,496 596 

Early to need ................................................................................ [–12,900 ] 

005 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) ........................... 432,936 422,936 

Unjustified program management cost growth ......................... [–10,000 ] 

006 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............ 21,930 21,930 

007 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ................... 627,294 597,794 

Exceeds annual manufacturing capability ................................ [–27,000 ] 

Excessive program management and engineering change orders.[–2,500 ] 

008 PLS ESP .............................................................................................. 251,667 251,667 

010 MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY ...................................... 56,671 56,671 

012 TRUCK, TRACTOR, LINE HAUL, M915/M916 ............................. 1,461 0 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–1,461 ] 

013 HVY EZPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV ........ 156,747 156,747 

014 HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM .................................. 161,631 4,313 

Funding provided in approved prior year reprogramming action.[–157,318 ] 

015 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ............... 39,908 39,908 

016 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .............................................. 362,672 344,772 

Excessive program support costs ................................................. [–14,000 ] 

HMMWV installation early to need ............................................ [–3,900 ] 

017 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ...... 142,862 127,862 

Excessive program support costs ................................................. [–15,000 ] 

020 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS, OPA1 ........................................................ 20,156 0 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–20,156 ] 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

021 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ............................................................. 1,161 1,161 

022 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 3,222 3,222 

023 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ............................................. 19,869 19,869 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

024 JOINT COMBAT IDENTIFICATION MARKING SYSTEM .......... 9,984 9,984 

025 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK .................... 974,186 865,186 

Increment 2 contract delay .......................................................... [–109,000 ] 

026 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ................................................. 4,826 4,826 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

028 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ...... 123,859 123,859 

029 SHF TERM ......................................................................................... 8,910 8,249 

Full funding for engineering change proposals in prior years [–661 ] 

031 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ............... 29,568 26,368 

Fielding cost growth .................................................................... [–3,200 ] 

032 SMART-T (SPACE) ............................................................................ 49,704 49,704 

033 SCAMP (SPACE) ................................................................................ 2,415 2,415 

034 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ......................................................... 73,374 64,774 

Excessive unit cost growth ........................................................... [–8,600 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
425 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

035 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ............................................... 31,799 31,799 

COMM—COMBAT SUPPORT COMM 

036 MOD-IN-SERVICE PROFILER ........................................................ 969 969 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

037 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ....................... 18,788 18,788 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

038 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) ............. 3,994 3,994 

039 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ............................................... 775,832 427,099 

Airborne, Maritime, Fixed Station program delay .................... [–106,000 ] 

Army requested transfer to RDTE Navy line 100 ...................... [–51,000 ] 

Ground Mobile Radio program restructure ............................... [–153,833 ] 

Program Decrease - Maritime/Fixed Station ............................ [–37,900 ] 

040 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .......................................... 8,336 8,336 

041 SINCGARS FAMILY .......................................................................... 4,992 500 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–4,492 ] 

043 TRACTOR DESK ................................................................................ 10,827 10,827 

045 SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT .................................... 36,224 36,224 

047 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS.1,843 1,843 

049 GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) ...................................... 3,939 1,000 

Early to need ................................................................................ [–2,939 ] 

050 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY ...................................... 38,535 38,535 

051 MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE (MC4) ................ 26,232 26,232 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 

053 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE .............................................. 1,547 1,547 

054 CIVIL AFFAIRS/INFO OPS ............................................................. 28,266 28,266 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

055 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) ........................................... 12,541 12,541 

056 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP .............. 39,349 37,022 

Army requested transfer to line 56a ........................................... [–2,327 ] 

056A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS ............................................................... 2,327 

Army requested transfer from line 56 ........................................ [2,327 ] 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

057 TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION .................................................... 2,232 2,232 

058 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS .......................................... 37,780 37,780 

059 WW TECH CON IMP PROG (WWTCIP) .......................................... 12,805 12,805 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INFORMATION SYSTEMS .............................................................. 187,227 131,227 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–56,000 ] 

061 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) .......................................... 4,393 4,393 

062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM( 310,761 310,761 

063 PENTAGON INFORMATION MGT AND TELECOM .................... 4,992 4,992 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

066 JTT/CIBS-M ....................................................................................... 4,657 4,657 

067 PROPHET GROUND ......................................................................... 72,041 72,041 

070 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 144,548 124,548 

Unjustified growth ....................................................................... [–20,000 ] 

071 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) ......................... 1,199 1,199 

072 TROJAN (MIP) ................................................................................... 32,707 32,707 

073 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ................................ 9,163 9,163 

074 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) (MIP ...... 3,493 3,493 

075 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP) .................................................... 802 802 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

076 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................. 33,810 33,810 

077 CREW .................................................................................................. 24,104 0 

Requirement met with prior year funds ..................................... [–24,104 ] 

080 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.1,252 1,252 

081 CI MODERNIZATION ....................................................................... 1,332 1,332 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 FAAD GBS .......................................................................................... 7,958 3,958 

Violates full funding .................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

083 SENTINEL MODS ............................................................................. 41,657 41,657 

084 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ........................................ 47,498 47,498 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
426 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

085 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ................................................................ 156,204 156,204 

086 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 102,334 102,334 

087 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ...................................... 186,859 186,859 

088 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............ 10,227 10,227 

090 COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-RAM) ............ 15,774 15,774 

092 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM ................................... 25,356 25,356 

095 PROFILER .......................................................................................... 3,312 3,312 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ...................... 3,005 3,005 

098 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................... 69,514 69,514 

099 LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/RANGEFINDER ........... 58,042 58,042 

101 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................. 21,022 17,022 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

102 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 227,629 227,629 

103 ARMS CONTROL ENHANCED SENSOR & MONITORING 

SYSTEM.

2,226 2,226 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

104 TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS ............................................. 54,907 54,907 

105 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ........................................................... 54,223 54,223 

106 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (BC 12,454 12,454 

107 FAAD C2 ............................................................................................. 5,030 5,030 

108 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............... 62,710 62,710 

109 KNIGHT FAMILY .............................................................................. 51,488 46,488 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–5,000 ] 

110 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ................................ 1,807 1,807 

111 AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ......................... 28,924 27,324 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–1,600 ] 

115 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ....................................... 34,031 34,031 

116 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................... 210,312 124,026 

Army identified excess ................................................................. [–15,000 ] 

Army requested transfer to OMA Budget Activity 04 ................ [–9,251 ] 

Army requested transfer to OPA line 119 .................................. [–1,795 ] 

Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 177 ..................... [–60,240 ] 

117 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET .... 19,113 19,113 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

119 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM ............... 23,664 25,459 

Army requested transfer from OPA line 116 ............................. [1,795 ] 

120 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ............................................ 11,192 11,192 

121 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP .................................. 220,250 174,772 

Army identified excess ................................................................. [–10,478 ] 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–35,000 ] 

122 CSS COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................ 39,310 39,310 

123 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................ 41,248 41,248 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

124 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) .................................................... 10,437 10,437 

125 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) .............. 7,480 4,395 

Excessive design engineering costs ............................................. [–3,085 ] 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

126 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ........................................... 571 571 

127 BCT NETWORK ................................................................................. 0 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

127A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 4,273 4,273 

127U UNDISTRIBUTED OPA2 .................................................................. 0 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

129 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ....................... 8,636 5,213 

Accoustic hailing device contract delay ...................................... [–3,423 ] 

130 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ................................................. 41,204 41,204 

131 CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION ...................................................... 10,700 10,700 

132 SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) ........ 362 362 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

133 TACTICAL BRIDGING ...................................................................... 77,428 77,428 

134 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ........................................... 49,154 45,454 

Excessive program support cost growth ..................................... [–3,700 ] 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
427 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

135 HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST 39,263 39,263 

136 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ......... 20,678 20,678 

137 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ......................... 30,297 22,297 

M160 incremental funding .......................................................... [–8,000 ] 

138 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ... 17,626 17,626 

139 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ............................................... 14,672 14,672 

140 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 7,352 7,352 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

142 HEATERS AND ECU’S ..................................................................... 10,109 10,109 

144 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ............................................................. 9,591 9,591 

146 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) .............. 8,509 8,509 

147 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ......................................................... 184,072 63,500 

Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 119 ..................... [–13,100 ] 

Program delay .............................................................................. [–107,472 ] 

148 MOUNTED SOLDIER SYSTEM ...................................................... 43,419 5,000 

Army offered program reduction ................................................ [–38,419 ] 

150 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 26,860 26,860 

151 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 68,392 68,392 

152 MOBILE INTEGRATED REMAINS COLLECTION SYSTEM: .... 7,384 7,384 

153 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ...... 54,190 54,190 

154 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ............................................. 12,482 12,482 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

156 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER ................ 75,457 75,457 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

158 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ....................................................... 53,450 53,450 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

159 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .................... 16,572 16,572 

160 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) ....................................... 3,852 3,852 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

161 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ...................................... 2,201 2,201 

162 SKID STEER LOADER (SSL) FAMILY OF SYSTEM ................... 8,584 3,984 

Excessive unit cost and program support cost growth .............. [–4,600 ] 

163 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING .......................................................... 21,031 21,031 

164 MISSION MODULES - ENGINEERING ......................................... 43,432 43,432 

165 COMPACTOR ..................................................................................... 2,859 2,859 

168 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ........................................................... 59,534 50,434 

Unjustified program support cost growth .................................. [–9,100 ] 

169 PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING ............................................................. 8,314 614 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–7,700 ] 

170 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR TYPE - FOS .......... 18,974 18,974 

171 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPA ........... 15,833 0 

Unexecutable acquisition strategy .............................................. [–15,833 ] 

172 CONST EQUIP ESP .......................................................................... 9,771 9,771 

173 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ................................ 12,654 12,654 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

174 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) .......................................... 223,845 0 

Army requested transfer to SC,N line 17 ................................... [–187,226 ] 

Excess to need .............................................................................. [–36,619 ] 

176 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................... 10,175 10,175 

GENERATORS 

177 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP .................................. 31,897 31,897 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

179 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS .................................................................. 10,944 10,944 

180 ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM ..................................... 21,859 21,859 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

181 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT .................................. 133,178 46,117 

Army offered program reduction ................................................ [–87,061 ] 

182 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM ............................................. 168,392 168,392 

183 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ........................................ 17,760 13,290 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–4,470 ] 

184 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER ................. 9,413 9,413 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

186 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ............................................... 13,618 13,618 

187 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ............. 49,437 36,937 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
428 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–12,500 ] 

188 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ....................... 30,451 30,451 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

189 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............ 4,923 4,923 

190 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ..................................... 69,316 19,606 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–49,710 ] 

191 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT .......................................... 1,591 1,591 

192 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) .................... 72,271 72,271 

193 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) ......................................... 2,325 2,325 

194 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................. 17,411 17,411 

195 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 ......................................................... 34,500 34,500 

196 TRACTOR YARD ................................................................................ 3,740 3,740 

197 BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE ......................................... 24,805 24,805 

198 BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT ............................ 149,308 26,008 

Program cancelation .................................................................... [–123,300 ] 

199 BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT INC 2 ................. 57,103 0 

Program cancelation .................................................................... [–57,103 ] 

200 BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE INC 2 .............................. 11,924 0 

Program cancelation .................................................................... [–11,924 ] 

OPA2 

201 INITIAL SPARES - C&E ................................................................... 21,647 21,647 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ....................... 9,682,592 7,911,714 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .................................................................................... 220,634 0 

Transfer to OCO: JIEDDO Operations ...................................... [–220,634 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT 

FUND.

220,634 0 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................ 1,079,364 994,596 

Avionics PGSE cost growth ......................................................... [–36,000 ] 

CFE Electronics cost growth ....................................................... [–26,600 ] 

Engine cost growth ...................................................................... [–9,168 ] 

Other ILS cost growth ................................................................. [–6,000 ] 

Reduce Engineering Change Orders (ECO) to fiscal year 2010 

levels.

[–7,000 ] 

002 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 28,119 28,119 

003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET ................................................... 2,366,752 2,240,184 

Armament cost growth ................................................................ [–2,548 ] 

CFE Electronics cost growth ....................................................... [–15,540 ] 

ECO excess ................................................................................... [–21,000 ] 

Engine cost growth ...................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

Government furnished equipment engine cost growth .............. [–4,480 ] 

Multi-year procurement savings ................................................. [–68,000 ] 

004 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 64,962 63,262 

Airframe termination liability growth ....................................... [–1,700 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV ......................................................... 1,503,096 1,448,096 

Engineering change order carryover ........................................... [–20,000 ] 

Logistic support growth ............................................................... [–5,000 ] 

Peculiar ground support equipment growth .............................. [–30,000 ] 

006 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 217,666 109,066 

Reduce advance procurement ...................................................... [–108,600 ] 

007 JSF STOVL ......................................................................................... 1,141,933 1,141,933 

008 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 117,229 117,229 

009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ....................................................................... 2,224,817 2,199,317 

Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–10,500 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–15,000 ] 

010 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 84,008 63,768 

Advance procurement equipment cost growth ............................ [–20,240 ] 

011 UH–1Y/AH–1Z ................................................................................... 700,306 652,561 

AH–1Z (new build) GFE Electronics cost growth ...................... [–2,345 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
429 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

AH–1Z (remanufacture) airframe cost growth ........................... [–9,400 ] 

Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–6,000 ] 

Unjustified support increase ....................................................... [–30,000 ] 

012 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 68,310 56,750 

Excess advance procurement ....................................................... [–11,560 ] 

013 MH–60S (MYP) ................................................................................... 408,921 400,621 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–8,300 ] 

014 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 74,040 74,040 

015 MH–60R ............................................................................................... 791,025 775,525 

Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–4,200 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–11,300 ] 

016 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 209,431 209,431 

017 P–8A POSEIDON ............................................................................... 2,018,851 2,008,851 

Support funding increase ............................................................ [–10,000 ] 

018 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 256,594 244,894 

Excess advance procurement ....................................................... [–11,700 ] 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ....................................................................... 914,892 886,892 

Excess funding reserve ................................................................. [–20,000 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–8,000 ] 

020 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 157,942 157,942 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

022 JPATS .................................................................................................. 266,906 256,906 

Excess ECO .................................................................................. [–10,000 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

024 KC–130J .............................................................................................. 87,288 87,288 

026 MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................... 191,986 191,986 

027 STUASL0 UAV ................................................................................... 12,772 0 

Low rate initial production contract award slip ....................... [–12,772 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ..................................................................................... 27,734 27,734 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 34,065 31,765 

Air launched decoy jammer ........................................................ [–2,300 ] 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 30,762 29,162 

Non-recurring installation funding unjustified increase .......... [–1,600 ] 

032 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 499,597 425,167 

ECP 904 Part 1 cost growth ........................................................ [–6,930 ] 

ECP 904 Part 1 procurement ahead of need .............................. [–16,500 ] 

Integrated Logistics Support excess to need ............................... [–20,900 ] 

OSIP 001–10 ANAV installation kits cost growth ..................... [–1,000 ] 

OSIP 011–84 installation funds savings .................................... [–9,300 ] 

OSIP 11–99 installation funding ahead of need ....................... [–7,000 ] 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–12,800 ] 

033 H–46 SERIES ..................................................................................... 27,112 24,612 

Unjustified Request ..................................................................... [–2,500 ] 

034 AH–1W SERIES .................................................................................. 15,828 15,828 

035 H–53 SERIES ..................................................................................... 62,820 60,320 

DIRCM Other support excess ...................................................... [–1,000 ] 

Kapton wiring installation kit cost growth ................................ [–1,500 ] 

036 SH–60 SERIES ................................................................................... 83,394 83,394 

037 H–1 SERIES ....................................................................................... 11,012 8,412 

Obsolescence install unjustified growth ..................................... [–2,600 ] 

038 EP–3 SERIES ..................................................................................... 83,181 73,681 

Obsolescence ECP installation funding growth ......................... [–2,700 ] 

OSIP 11–01 JMOD obsolescence carryover ................................ [–5,100 ] 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–1,700 ] 

039 P–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 171,466 170,466 

HFIP modification kit procurement ahead of need ................... [–1,000 ] 

040 E–2 SERIES ........................................................................................ 29,215 29,215 

041 TRAINER A/C SERIES .................................................................... 22,090 18,790 

Training equipment growth ........................................................ [–3,300 ] 

042 C–2A ..................................................................................................... 16,302 16,302 

043 C–130 SERIES .................................................................................... 27,139 27,139 

044 FLEET EW .......................................................................................... 2,773 1,773 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–1,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
430 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

045 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ............................................... 16,463 16,463 

046 E–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 165,253 148,053 

Block I install cost savings ......................................................... [–1,200 ] 

Block II FAB-T non-recurring engineering early to need .......... [–5,200 ] 

OSIP 008–10 support funding growth ....................................... [–2,000 ] 

OSIP 013–10 support funding growth ....................................... [–1,000 ] 

Service life extension program install early to need .................. [–7,800 ] 

047 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................... 58,011 77,511 

Navy requested transfer from RDT&E, Navy line 98, for VH– 

3/VH–60 sustainment.

[24,000 ] 

OSIP 009–02 excess installation funding .................................. [–4,500 ] 

048 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 12,248 11,048 

Install equipment nonrecurring unjustified growth .................. [–1,200 ] 

049 T–45 SERIES ...................................................................................... 57,779 45,779 

Avionics Obsolescence contract support growth ......................... [–6,000 ] 

Correction of Deficiencies contract support growth ................... [–6,000 ] 

050 AIRCRAFT POWER PLANT CHANGES ......................................... 21,847 21,847 

051 JPATS SERIES .................................................................................. 1,524 524 

Unobligated balances .................................................................. [–1,000 ] 

052 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ................................................. 1,069 1,069 

053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 92,072 63,772 

DIRCM A kit savings .................................................................. [–2,800 ] 

IDECM Block IV concurrency ..................................................... [–25,500 ] 

054 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 147,093 136,293 

CNS/ATM Other support growth ............................................... [–8,800 ] 

OSIP 01–02 other support growth .............................................. [–2,000 ] 

056 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 37,330 32,030 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–5,300 ] 

057 P–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 2,930 0 

P–8 modifications ahead of need ................................................ [–2,930 ] 

058 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ............................................................ 489 489 

059 RQ–7 SERIES ..................................................................................... 11,419 0 

TCDL contract delay ................................................................... [–11,419 ] 

060 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ............................................. 60,264 55,764 

Deficiencies modifications other support growth ....................... [–2,500 ] 

Reliability modifications other support growth ......................... [–2,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 1,331,961 1,163,294 

E–2D initial spares cost growth .................................................. [–8,700 ] 

F/A–18E/F initial spares cost growth ....................................... [–23,967 ] 

F–35 initial spares execution ...................................................... [–100,000 ] 

P–8A initial spares execution ...................................................... [–36,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

062 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 351,685 363,685 

Transfer from PE 64273N (RDN 98) for VH–60 trainer .......... [12,000 ] 

063 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 22,358 22,358 

064 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 27,300 27,300 

065 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 10,124 10,124 

066 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................. 24,395 21,395 

Unjustified support increase ....................................................... [–3,000 ] 

067 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 1,719 1,719 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 18,587,033 17,673,534 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS ........................................................................... 1,309,102 1,299,102 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–10,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ............................................. 3,492 3,492 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ....................................................................................... 303,306 297,606 

Submarine capsules cost growth ................................................ [–5,700 ] 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 188,494 105,119 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
431 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

All Up Round Missile contract delay ......................................... [–83,375 ] 

005 SIDEWINDER .................................................................................... 47,098 42,198 

Excess Block II support ............................................................... [–4,900 ] 

006 JSOW ................................................................................................... 137,722 131,722 

All Up Round Missile cost growth .............................................. [–6,000 ] 

007 STANDARD MISSILE ....................................................................... 420,324 356,878 

Installation and check out funding growth ............................... [–1,900 ] 

Support funding growth .............................................................. [–3,500 ] 

Unit Cost efficiencies ................................................................... [–58,046 ] 

008 RAM ..................................................................................................... 66,197 66,197 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 22,703 22,703 

011 AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................................ 46,359 46,359 

012 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ........................................................... 3,561 3,561 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

013 ESSM ................................................................................................... 48,486 48,486 

014 HARM MODS ..................................................................................... 73,061 71,561 

Production support growth ......................................................... [–1,500 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 1,979 1,979 

017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ..................................... 238,215 238,215 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

019 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 52,255 52,255 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

020 ASW TARGETS .................................................................................. 31,803 31,803 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ................................................................. 78,045 76,605 

MK–54 array cost growth ............................................................ [–1,440 ] 

022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ................................................... 42,493 42,493 

023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ....................................................................... 5,770 5,770 

023A UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................. 0 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 43,003 43,003 

025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT ................................................................... 9,219 9,219 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 3,553 3,553 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 15,037 15,037 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ....................................................................................... 37,550 37,550 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS .............................................................. 17,525 9,179 

MK–110 57MM contract delay .................................................... [–8,346 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ......................................................................... 43,957 43,957 

032 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ...................................... 50,013 50,013 

033 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ....................... 12,203 12,203 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

035 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 55,953 49,614 

CIWS replenishment spares execution ........................................ [–6,339 ] 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 3,408,478 3,217,432 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY 

OTHER WARSHIPS 

002 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ......................................... 554,798 554,798 

003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ..................................................... 3,232,215 3,221,314 

Exterior Communications System other cost unjustfied growth [–1,000 ] 

Propulsor cost growth .................................................................. [–5,538 ] 

Sonar hardware pricing cost growth .......................................... [–4,363 ] 

004 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ..................................................... 1,524,761 1,461,361 

Nuclear long lead CFE advance procurement cost growth ....... [–63,400 ] 

006 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS .................................................... 529,652 529,652 

008 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................ 453,727 453,727 

009 DDG–51 ............................................................................................... 1,980,709 1,980,709 

010 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 100,723 100,723 

011 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP .............................................................. 1,802,093 1,755,093 

Basic construction cost growth ................................................... [–47,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
432 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

013 LPD–17 ................................................................................................ 1,847,444 1,837,444 

Excess ECO funding .................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

015 LHA REPLACEMENT ....................................................................... 2,018,691 1,999,191 

MK–12 IFF pricing ...................................................................... [–1,000 ] 

RAM logistics pricing .................................................................. [–5,500 ] 

SLQ–32(V)2 pricing ..................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

SPQ–9B radar pricing ................................................................. [–1,000 ] 

SPS–48 radar pricing .................................................................. [–2,000 ] 

SSDS support pricing .................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

017 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ........................................................ 185,106 372,332 

Transfer from OP,A line 174 per Army and Navy Memorandum of Agreement.[187,226 ] 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

018 OCEANOGRAPHIC SHIPS ............................................................... 89,000 89,000 

019 MOORED TRAINING SHIP .............................................................. 155,200 131,200 

Excess advance procurement ....................................................... [–24,000 ] 

020 OUTFITTING ..................................................................................... 292,871 270,639 

CVN–71 outfitting phasing ......................................................... [–5,000 ] 

DDG–1001 and 1002 outfitting phasing .................................... [–1,750 ] 

LCS–5 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–2,000 ] 

LCS–6 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–2,000 ] 

LCS–7 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–782 ] 

SSN–782 post delivery phasing .................................................. [–4,700 ] 

SSN–785 outfitting phasing ........................................................ [–6,000 ] 

021 SERVICE CRAFT ............................................................................... 3,863 3,863 

022 LCAC SLEP ........................................................................................ 84,076 84,076 

023 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS .................. 73,992 73,992 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ........ 14,928,921 14,919,114 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 64,766 63,666 

BLU–109 cost growth .................................................................. [–1,100 ] 

003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 38,264 23,264 

MK–182 warhead exceeds production rate ................................. [–3,500 ] 

MK–66 rocket motor cost growth ................................................ [–10,500 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–1,000 ] 

004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 17,788 17,788 

005 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 35,289 35,289 

006 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ............................ 49,416 46,716 

Initiator and Impulse cartridge unit cost growth ..................... [–2,700 ] 

007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 60,677 60,677 

008 JATOS ................................................................................................. 2,766 2,766 

009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ..................................................... 19,006 10,901 

Excess prior year multi-option fuze support funding ................ [–7,105 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–1,000 ] 

010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ........................ 19,320 1,112 

MK295 cartridge contract delay ................................................. [–18,208 ] 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 21,938 19,018 

Production engineering growth ................................................... [–2,920 ] 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 51,819 46,039 

A131 complete rounds cost growth ............................................. [–2,500 ] 

A576 LAP kit cost growth ........................................................... [–2,080 ] 

Production engineering growth ................................................... [–1,200 ] 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 10,199 10,199 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 4,107 4,107 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 58,812 58,812 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 21,434 17,660 

M913 LAP kit contract delay ...................................................... [–3,774 ] 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 84,864 80,664 

B542 LAP kit cost growth ........................................................... [–4,200 ] 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 937 937 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
433 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

019 81MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 26,324 18,100 

M913 LAP kit contract delay ...................................................... [–8,224 ] 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 9,387 9,387 

021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................... 3,889 3,889 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 13,452 13,452 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 15,556 12,463 

C995 late contract award ............................................................ [–3,093 ] 

024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 42,526 22,526 

TNT flake cost growth ................................................................. [–20,000 ] 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 22,786 22,786 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 9,266 9,266 

027 NON LETHALS .................................................................................. 2,927 2,927 

028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ............................................................... 8,557 8,557 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 3,880 3,880 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ....... 719,952 626,848 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE .................................................................. 13,794 13,794 

002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ....................................................... 8,643 8,643 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

003 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT .............................................. 22,982 20,582 

ECDIS-N installation funding carryover ................................... [–1,000 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–1,400 ] 

PERISCOPES 

004 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP ........................................ 60,860 57,033 

ISIS capability insertion procurement ahead of need ............... [–3,827 ] 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

005 DDG MOD ........................................................................................... 119,522 117,522 

Engineering services carryover ................................................... [–2,000 ] 

006 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 17,637 17,637 

007 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD .............................. 3,049 3,049 

008 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................... 22,266 22,266 

009 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 15,892 14,122 

SSTG governor procurement ahead of need .............................. [–1,770 ] 

010 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................. 100,693 93,487 

ISEA labs growth ........................................................................ [–2,100 ] 

SCS modernization backfit funding ahead of need ................... [–2,106 ] 

Technology insertion/technology refresh growth ....................... [–3,000 ] 

011 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ............................................................... 42,296 42,296 

012 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 25,228 25,228 

013 DEEP SUBMERGENCE SYSTEMS ................................................ 2,600 2,600 

014 CG MODERNIZATION ...................................................................... 590,349 573,349 

Engineering services carryover ................................................... [–6,000 ] 

Shore Site Upgrades--Excessive Growth .................................... [–11,000 ] 

016 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS .................................................. 18,499 17,499 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–1,000 ] 

017 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 113,809 93,401 

AS–39 modernization traveling crane funding previously appropriated.[–3,369 ] 

Auto Voltage Regulators--Ahead of Need ................................... [–3,480 ] 

LCS Waterjet Impellers--No Longer Required ........................... [–10,859 ] 

Machalts growth .......................................................................... [–2,700 ] 

018 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ............................................ 5,508 5,508 

019 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................ 13,397 13,397 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

020 REACTOR POWER UNITS ............................................................... 436,838 436,838 

021 REACTOR COMPONENTS ............................................................... 271,600 271,600 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

022 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 11,244 9,644 

Outfitting equipment package cost growth ................................ [–1,600 ] 

SMALL BOATS 

023 STANDARD BOATS .......................................................................... 39,793 33,653 

7M RIB contract delay ................................................................ [–4,140 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
434 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Medium sized force protection boats cost growth ...................... [–2,000 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

024 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT ...................................... 29,913 29,913 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

025 OPERATING FORCES IPE ............................................................... 54,642 54,642 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

026 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS .............................................................. 144,175 144,175 

027 LCS MODULES .................................................................................. 79,583 63,448 

AN/AQS–20A--Contract Delay ................................................... [–8,920 ] 

Engineering change proposal growth ......................................... [–4,715 ] 

Production Support--Excess to Need .......................................... [–2,500 ] 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

028 LSD MIDLIFE .................................................................................... 143,483 132,733 

Air conditioner plant upgrades installation ahead of need ...... [–2,000 ] 

RO desalinater units installation funding ahead of need ........ [–6,750 ] 

Steering control upgrade installation funding ahead of need .. [–2,000 ] 

SHIP RADARS 

029 RADAR SUPPORT ............................................................................. 18,818 10,618 

Excess ECO funding .................................................................... [–1,800 ] 

Radar procurement ahead of need ............................................. [–6,400 ] 

SHIP SONARS 

030 SPQ–9B RADAR ................................................................................. 24,613 18,236 

Radar procurement ahead of need ............................................. [–6,377 ] 

031 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ................................ 73,829 71,771 

Sonar upgrade cost growth ......................................................... [–2,058 ] 

032 SSN ACOUSTICS .............................................................................. 212,913 212,913 

033 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................ 29,686 25,686 

Mission integration installation funding ahead of need ........... [–4,000 ] 

034 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................... 13,537 13,537 

035 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ................................................ 18,141 16,841 

ICADS cost growth ...................................................................... [–1,300 ] 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

036 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ............................ 20,554 20,554 

037 SSTD ................................................................................................... 2,257 1,257 

Excess support funding ............................................................... [–1,000 ] 

038 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 60,141 60,141 

039 SURTASS ............................................................................................ 29,247 25,547 

ICP installation funding ahead of need ..................................... [–1,500 ] 

Integrated Common Processor [ICP] Procurement--Ahead of 

Need.

[–2,200 ] 

040 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNAISANCE FORCE ............... 13,453 13,453 

040A UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................. 0 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

041 AN/SLQ–32 ........................................................................................ 43,096 39,902 

Block 1B3 Units--No Longer Required ....................................... [–3,194 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

042 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ............................................................... 103,645 100,745 

Paragon Systems--Change to Procurement Strategy ................. [–2,900 ] 

043 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ........................ 1,364 1,364 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG .............................. 100,793 89,241 

ICADF antenna installation delay ............................................. [–7,286 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–2,000 ] 

Tech and capability insertion procurement ahead of need ....... [–2,266 ] 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

045 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................. 23,332 19,332 

PAAA Backfit Installation Funding--No Longer Required ....... [–2,000 ] 

Signal Data Processors Backfits--Ahead of Need ...................... [–2,000 ] 

046 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) ................................... 426 426 

047 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) .. 33,017 33,017 

048 ATDLS ................................................................................................. 942 942 

049 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................. 7,896 7,896 

050 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ............................... 27,868 27,868 

051 SHALLOW WATER MCM ................................................................. 1,048 1,048 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
435 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

052 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ........................................... 9,926 9,926 

053 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ......................... 4,370 4,370 

054 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 4,143 4,143 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

055 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 45,989 35,189 

COTS obsolescence excessive growth .......................................... [–10,800 ] 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

056 MATCALS ........................................................................................... 8,136 13,368 

Radar upgrade transfer from Title XV ...................................... [7,232 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–2,000 ] 

057 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ......................................... 7,394 7,394 

058 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ................................ 18,518 17,018 

ECO growth .................................................................................. [–1,500 ] 

059 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM ................................................... 26,054 24,581 

Digital Airport Surveillance Radar cost growth ....................... [–1,473 ] 

060 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ................................ 7,213 7,213 

061 LANDING SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 7,138 7,138 

062 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 33,170 31,470 

Mark XII Mode 5–-Ahead of Need .............................................. [–1,700 ] 

063 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ...................................... 8,941 8,941 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT ............................ 8,994 8,994 

065 MARITIME INTERGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM ................... 13,529 13,529 

066 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS .............................................. 12,776 10,876 

Tactical/Mobile C4I Systems Increment 2.1 Ahead of Need .... [–1,900 ] 

067 DCGS-N ............................................................................................... 11,201 11,201 

068 CANES ................................................................................................ 195,141 96,088 

Installation ahead of need .......................................................... [–7,153 ] 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–2,300 ] 

Transfer to PE 33138N (RDN 201) per USN request ............... [–12,000 ] 

Transfer to Ship Communications Automation (OPN 76) per 

USN request.

[–77,600 ] 

069 RADIAC ............................................................................................... 6,201 6,201 

070 CANES-INTELL ................................................................................. 75,084 72,313 

Installation ahead of need .......................................................... [–2,771 ] 

071 ELECTRONIC TEST EQUIPMENT ................................................ 6,010 6,010 

072 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ................................. 4,441 4,441 

073 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................... 4,741 4,741 

074 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 51,716 42,416 

SPS–48 radar cost growth .......................................................... [–2,500 ] 

SPS–48 radar upgrade procurement ahead of need ................. [–6,800 ] 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

075 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS ............................. 26,197 1,494 

JTRS AMF--Program Delay ....................................................... [–24,703 ] 

076 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION ................................... 177,510 255,110 

Transfer from CANES (OPN 68) per USN request ................... [77,600 ] 

077 MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESS (MDA) ................................... 24,022 24,022 

078 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .................................... 33,644 27,544 

BFTN--Installations Ahead of Need ........................................... [–2,800 ] 

HMS Radios--Contract Delays .................................................... [–3,300 ] 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

079 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT .......................................... 10,357 10,357 

080 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................... 75,447 74,047 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–1,400 ] 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

081 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ............................... 25,522 25,522 

082 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ........................................ 109,022 107,242 

Submarine terminal cost growth ................................................ [–1,780 ] 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

083 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ........................................ 2,186 2,186 

084 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS ................................................... 1,329 1,329 

085 NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................ 2,418 2,418 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

086 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 119,857 109,394 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
436 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

EKMS Afloat--KMI Ahead of Need ............................................. [–2,074 ] 

Excess installation funding ......................................................... [–3,789 ] 

VACM Program Delay ................................................................. [–4,600 ] 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

087 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP ............................... 14,820 14,820 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

088 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 6,848 6,848 

DRUG INTERDICTION SUPPORT 

089 OTHER DRUG INTERDICTION SUPPORT .................................. 2,290 2,290 

SONOBUOYS 

090 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ............................................................. 96,314 94,814 

AN/SSQ–110 cost growth ........................................................... [–1,500 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

091 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 40,697 37,697 

Threat presentation program growth ......................................... [–3,000 ] 

092 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ........................................................ 8,561 8,561 

093 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................... 8,941 5,587 

Munitions trailer contract delay ................................................. [–2,354 ] 

Ordnance trailer contract delay .................................................. [–1,000 ] 

094 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ..................... 19,777 19,777 

095 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................ 22,003 19,478 

Meteorological Mobile Facility (Replacement) Next Generation 

contract delay.

[–2,525 ] 

096 DIGITAL CAMERA RECEIVING STATION ................................... 1,595 1,595 

097 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ............................................................. 66,031 60,919 

Flight deck cranial cost growth .................................................. [–5,112 ] 

098 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................... 49,668 33,515 

AN/AQS–20A--Contract Delay ................................................... [–6,903 ] 

Production line set up excess funding ........................................ [–9,250 ] 

099 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................... 18,471 12,908 

Modification kit procurement ahead of need ............................. [–5,563 ] 

100 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ...................... 7,875 7,875 

101 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 12,553 12,553 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

102 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ............................................... 2,049 2,049 

103 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............................................. 4,488 4,488 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

104 NATO SEASPARROW ....................................................................... 8,926 8,926 

105 RAM GMLS ......................................................................................... 4,321 3,128 

Installation funding ahead of need ............................................ [–1,193 ] 

106 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ..................................................... 60,700 54,324 

SSDS COTS Conversion Kits Ahead of Need ............................ [–6,376 ] 

107 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 43,148 43,148 

108 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................... 72,861 70,261 

Support funding carryover .......................................................... [–2,600 ] 

109 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ..................................................... 732 732 

110 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS .............. 4,823 4,823 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

111 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ..................................... 187,807 187,807 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

112 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................. 81,596 89,096 

Naval Intelligence Fusion Tool transfer from Title XV ............ [7,500 ] 

113 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 5,241 5,241 

114 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................... 5,816 5,816 

115 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 7,842 7,842 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

116 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP ............................... 98,847 96,947 

Product improvement funding growth ....................................... [–1,900 ] 

117 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 4,073 4,073 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

118 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM ......................................... 32,716 32,716 

119 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ........................................... 5,814 5,814 

120 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ..................................... 36,777 36,777 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
437 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

121 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 6,271 4,771 

Non-SOCOM related contract delays ......................................... [–1,500 ] 

122 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ....................................................... 3,202 3,202 

123 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP ............................... 9,850 9,850 

124 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,315 14,315 

125 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 16,502 16,502 

126 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 3,235 3,235 

127 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................... 7,175 7,175 

128 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION ........................................................... 20,727 10,727 

Contract Delays ............................................................................ [–10,000 ] 

129 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ................................................. 1,142 1,142 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

130 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ........................................ 14,972 9,972 

Contract Delays ............................................................................ [–5,000 ] 

131 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 4,453 4,453 

132 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 6,416 6,416 

133 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS (IT) ............................... 51,894 51,894 

TRAINING DEVICES 

134 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 16,353 16,353 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 28,693 26,321 

SPAWAR--Excess to Need ........................................................... [–1,000 ] 

US Fleet Forces equipment growth ............................................. [–1,372 ] 

136 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 2,197 2,197 

137 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 7,175 4,175 

Medical and dental outfitting kit cost growth ........................... [–3,000 ] 

138 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 1,457 1,457 

140 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................... 15,330 15,330 

141 C4ISR EQUIPMENT .......................................................................... 136 136 

142 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 18,639 18,639 

143 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 177,240 177,240 

144 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................ 143,022 143,022 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

148A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 14,402 14,402 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

149 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 208,384 208,384 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ........................ 6,285,451 5,993,175 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................ 9,894 9,894 

002 LAV PIP ............................................................................................... 147,051 147,051 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ............................... 11,961 11,961 

004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................... 5,552 5,552 

005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ...................... 14,695 14,695 

006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .... 14,868 14,868 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 53,932 53,932 

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ...................................... 13,795 13,795 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ................................................... 12,287 12,287 

011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW ................................................................... 46,563 46,563 

012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) ............... 19,606 19,606 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 4,140 4,140 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 16,755 16,755 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 24,071 24,071 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ......................................................... 25,461 25,461 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................... 5,926 5,926 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
438 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ................................................... 44,152 44,152 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 40,352 40,352 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

021 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 8,793 4,470 

Excess to need .............................................................................. [–4,323 ] 

022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 64,276 64,276 

024 RQ–11 UAV ......................................................................................... 2,104 2,104 

025 DCGS-MC ............................................................................................ 10,789 10,789 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 6,847 6,847 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 218,869 218,869 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .......................................................... 84,856 84,856 

031 RADIO SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 89,479 79,770 

Equipment upgrade for CBNIRF (UFR) .................................... [1,000 ] 

Marine Corps recommendation ................................................... [–10,709 ] 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................. 16,598 16,598 

033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ......................... 47,505 47,505 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 1,606 1,606 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ...................................... 894 894 

035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ................................................ 14,231 14,231 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS ...................................... 8,389 8,389 

038 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ........................ 5,833 5,833 

039 LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP ............................................. 972 972 

040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ................................................ 21,848 21,848 

OTHER SUPPORT 

042 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 4,503 4,503 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

043 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 2,599 2,599 

044 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 16,255 16,255 

045 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ............................................................ 26,853 26,853 

046 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 27,247 27,247 

047 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................ 5,533 5,533 

048 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 61,753 61,753 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

049 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 16,627 16,627 

050 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ........... 10,827 10,827 

051 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ...................................................... 37,055 37,055 

052 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 1,462 1,462 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

053 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 24,079 24,079 

054 TRAINING DEVICES ........................................................................ 10,277 10,277 

055 CONTAINER FAMILY ....................................................................... 3,123 3,123 

056 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................... 18,137 18,137 

059 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN .................................................... 5,026 5,026 

OTHER SUPPORT 

060 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 5,206 5,206 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 90 90 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................... 1,391,602 1,377,570 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 3,340,615 3,189,615 

Reduce by one aircraft ................................................................. [–151,000 ] 

002 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 323,477 228,977 

Reduce advance procurement ...................................................... [–94,500 ] 

003 F–22A ................................................................................................... 104,118 104,118 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J ................................................................................................. 72,879 72,879 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
439 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

007 HC–130J .............................................................................................. 332,899 332,899 

009 MC–130J .............................................................................................. 582,466 582,466 

013 C–27J ................................................................................................... 479,896 479,896 

UPT TRAINERS 

015 USAFA POWERED FLIGHT PROGRAM ........................................ 1,060 1,060 

HELICOPTERS 

017 COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT .......................................... 52,800 52,800 

019 V22 OSPREY ...................................................................................... 339,865 339,865 

020 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 20,000 20,000 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

023 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C .................................................................. 2,190 2,190 

024 HH–60M .............................................................................................. 104,711 104,711 

025 LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECON ACFT ........................................ 158,549 115,049 

Reduction of three aircraft .......................................................... [–43,500 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

029 TARGET DRONES ............................................................................. 64,268 59,268 

Slow execution .............................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

030 C–37A ................................................................................................... 77,842 77,842 

031 RQ–4 .................................................................................................... 323,964 323,964 

032 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 71,500 71,500 

033 MC 130 ................................................................................................ 108,470 108,470 

034 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 813,092 0 

ASIP 2C early to need ................................................................. [–29,500 ] 

Block 5 to Block 1 adjustment .................................................... [–64,000 ] 

Transfer to OCO .......................................................................... [–719,592 ] 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

035 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 41,315 31,015 

Excess to need .............................................................................. [–10,300 ] 

036 B–1B ..................................................................................................... 198,007 198,007 

037 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 93,897 93,897 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

038 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 153,128 12,528 

Program reduction--Wing replacement program ....................... [–140,600 ] 

039 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 222,386 208,386 

Early to need--Mode 5 IFF .......................................................... [–14,000 ] 

040 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 73,346 56,746 

Mode 5 procurement ahead of need ............................................ [–16,600 ] 

041 F–22A ................................................................................................... 232,032 232,032 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

043 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 11,741 11,741 

045 C–5M .................................................................................................... 851,859 851,859 

046 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 112,200 112,200 

047 C–9C ..................................................................................................... 9 9 

048 C–17A ................................................................................................... 202,179 202,179 

049 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 328 328 

050 C–32A ................................................................................................... 12,157 1,757 

Program reduction--SLC3S--A .................................................... [–10,400 ] 

051 C–37A ................................................................................................... 21,986 486 

Program reduction--SLC3S--A .................................................... [–21,500 ] 

052 C–130 AMP .......................................................................................... 235,635 208,135 

Early to need--kit installs ............................................................ [–27,500 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

053 GLIDER MODS .................................................................................. 123 123 

054 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 15,086 15,086 

055 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 238 238 

056 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 31,032 31,032 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

057 KC–10A (ATCA) .................................................................................. 27,220 9,820 

Early to need--CNS/ATM ........................................................... [–17,400 ] 

058 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,777 1,777 

059 MC–12W .............................................................................................. 16,767 16,767 

060 C–20 MODS ........................................................................................ 241 241 

061 VC–25A MOD ...................................................................................... 387 387 

062 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 206 206 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
440 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

063 C–130 ................................................................................................... 45,876 56,276 

Transfer per Air Force Request from RDAF–81 ........................ [10,400 ] 

064 C–130 INTEL ...................................................................................... 3,593 3,593 

065 C–130J MODS .................................................................................... 38,174 38,174 

066 C–135 ................................................................................................... 62,210 62,210 

067 COMPASS CALL MODS ................................................................... 256,624 256,624 

068 RC–135 ................................................................................................ 162,211 162,211 

069 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 135,031 135,031 

070 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 57,829 57,829 

071 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 29,058 29,058 

072 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 5,280 5,280 

073 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 34,371 34,371 

074 RQ–4 MODS ........................................................................................ 89,177 89,177 

075 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ....................................................... 431 10,831 

Transfer from PE 65299F (RDAF 81) per USAF request ......... [10,400 ] 

076 OTHER MODIFICATIONS ............................................................... 115,338 68,238 

Early to need in FAB-T ............................................................... [–47,100 ] 

077 MQ–1 MODS ....................................................................................... 158,446 158,446 

078 MQ–9 MODS ....................................................................................... 181,302 149,744 

Block 5 fielding early to need ..................................................... [–31,558 ] 

079 MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS ..................................................................... 74,866 74,866 

080 CV–22 MODS ...................................................................................... 14,715 14,715 

AIRCRAFT SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

081 FIGHTER/UAV INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .................... 1,030,364 927,364 

Program reduction--poor execution ............................................. [–103,000 ] 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

082 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................... 92,394 90,318 

F–15 ESTS contract delay .......................................................... [–2,076 ] 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

083 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 4,743 4,743 

084 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 101 101 

085 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 49,319 49,319 

087 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 521 521 

089 KC–10A (ATCA) .................................................................................. 5,691 5,691 

090 C–17A ................................................................................................... 183,696 75,115 

Transition to post production ..................................................... [–108,581 ] 

091 C–130 ................................................................................................... 25,646 25,646 

093 C–135 ................................................................................................... 2,434 2,434 

094 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,076 2,076 

095 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 4,537 4,537 

097 OTHER AIRCRAFT ........................................................................... 40,025 23,225 

F–16 Block 40/50 MTC ............................................................... [–16,800 ] 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

098 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS ................................................. 21,050 21,050 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

099 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 87,220 0 

Transfer to OCO .......................................................................... [–87,220 ] 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

100 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 1,072,858 1,072,858 

DARP 

104 U–2 ....................................................................................................... 48,875 48,875 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

104A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 16,502 16,502 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

105 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................. 0 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....... 14,082,527 12,341,600 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 23,919 23,919 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 89,771 89,771 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 38,756 33,876 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
441 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

BDU–56 C/B—Unjustified cost growth ..................................... [–4,880 ] 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 168,557 133,557 

BDU–109—Incorrect cost estimate ............................................. [–35,000 ] 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 76,649 76,649 

FLARE, IR MJU–7B 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................ 42,410 42,410 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) ................................. 3,119 3,119 

008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 998 998 

009 MODIFICATIONS .............................................................................. 1,132 1,132 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 ....................................................... 5,075 5,075 

FUZES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 46,749 46,749 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................. 34,735 34,735 

SMALL ARMS 

013 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 7,195 7,195 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

539,065 499,185 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT - BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................... 67,745 67,745 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................. 236,193 236,193 

003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) ................................................................... 88,769 88,769 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 309,561 202,176 

Production Backlog ...................................................................... [–107,385 ] 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 46,830 46,830 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 7,523 7,523 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION ......................... 726 726 

CLASS IV 

008 ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILE ....................................................... 39 39 

009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 125,953 125,953 

010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ....................................................................... 266 266 

011 AGM–88A HARM ................................................................................ 25,642 25,642 

012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ...................................... 14,987 14,987 

MISSILE SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

013 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ................................................ 43,241 43,241 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

014 ADVANCED EHF ............................................................................... 552,833 552,833 

016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................... 468,745 875,745 

Reduction to Support Funding Growth ...................................... [–9,000 ] 

Transfer from PDW–20 ............................................................... [416,000 ] 

018 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .............................................................. 433,526 433,526 

019 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 81,811 81,811 

020 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) .................................................. 21,568 21,568 

021 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ................................................... 67,689 67,689 

022 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ............................. 101,397 101,397 

023 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................... 1,740,222 1,708,222 

Excess to need due to efficiencies ................................................ [–32,000 ] 

024 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) ......................................................................... 81,389 81,389 

025 Advance Procurement (CY) ............................................................. 243,500 243,500 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

031 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ..................................................... 154,727 154,727 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

031A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 1,159,135 746,980 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [–412,155 ] 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......... 6,074,017 5,929,477 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 5,621 5,621 

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ...................................................... 18,411 18,411 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
442 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

003 CAP VEHICLES ................................................................................. 917 917 

004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (CARGO ....................................... 18,694 18,694 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ....................................... 5,982 85 

Guardian Angel Contract Delay ................................................. [–2,941 ] 

HMMWV--In Excess of Need ....................................................... [–2,956 ] 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SPECIA ...................................... 20,677 20,677 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................... 22,881 22,881 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 ....................................................... 14,978 14,978 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU ........................ 16,556 16,556 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M BASE MAINT/CONST ......................... 30,225 30,225 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

011 COMSEC EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 135,169 135,169 

012 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) .......................................................... 1,263 1,263 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................... 2,645 2,645 

015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT .......................................... 21,762 21,762 

016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ............................................................ 899 899 

017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .................................................... 18,529 18,529 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS ................................. 32,473 32,473 

019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM .................................................... 51,426 51,426 

020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM - FIXED .......................................... 32,468 32,468 

021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN ........................... 22,813 22,813 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 14,619 14,619 

023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL ..................................... 39,144 38,144 

JFHQ equipment ......................................................................... [–1,000 ] 

024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX ............................................. 25,992 25,992 

025 TAC SIGNIT SPT ............................................................................... 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .................................. 52,263 52,263 

028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .................................. 16,951 16,951 

029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL ....................................... 26,433 17,033 

SLICC/Viper II Excess of Need .................................................. [–7,400 ] 

Wing LAN infrastructure—slow execution ................................. [–2,000 ] 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM .............................. 90,015 90,015 

031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ........................................................ 23,955 23,955 

032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ............................................................... 7,518 7,518 

033 GCSS-AF FOS .................................................................................... 72,641 72,641 

034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM .......................................... 22,301 22,301 

035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ............................... 15,525 15,525 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ...................................... 49,377 49,377 

037 BASE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................... 41,239 41,239 

038 AFNET ................................................................................................. 228,978 128,978 

Reduce Program Growth ............................................................. [–100,000 ] 

039 VOICE SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 43,603 23,603 

Reduce Program Growth ............................................................. [–20,000 ] 

040 USCENTCOM- JCSE ......................................................................... 30,983 30,983 

DISA PROGRAMS 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ..................................... 49,570 49,570 

042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ..................................................................... 2,008 2,008 

043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE .................................................. 4,863 4,863 

044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ............................ 61,386 61,386 

045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ........................................... 125,947 125,947 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ........................................................................ 104,720 36,570 

Early to need in FAB-T ............................................................... [–68,150 ] 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ....................................................................... 28,075 28,075 

048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ............................................................. 20,718 20,718 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 227,866 153,626 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
443 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

JTC Training and Rehearsal Schedule Ahead of Need ............ [–17,140 ] 

JTRS AMF Milestone C Delay .................................................... [–12,600 ] 

JTRS Handheld / Manpack Cost Increases .............................. [–44,500 ] 

050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER .................................... 22,184 7,184 

CSEL Contract Delay .................................................................. [–15,000 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ........................................................................ 11,408 11,408 

052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT .............................................. 11,559 11,559 

053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................. 105,977 80,977 

Slow Execution ............................................................................. [–25,000 ] 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ....................................................................... 76,810 76,810 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES .............................................................. 20,008 1,008 

Night Vision Cueing and Display Contract Delay .................... [–19,000 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY) .................................... 25,499 12,598 

Laser Eye Protection Contract Delay .......................................... [–5,800 ] 

MACH Early to Need ................................................................... [–7,101 ] 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP .......................... 37,829 37,829 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .................................................... 16,483 16,483 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 16,754 16,754 

060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT .................................... 3,653 903 

Unjustified Program Growth ...................................................... [–2,750 ] 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 30,345 20,345 

Power Generation--Reduce Growth ............................................. [–10,000 ] 

062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (BASE S) ...................................... 2,819 2,819 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ....................................................................................... 23,341 23,341 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................. 212,146 212,146 

067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ........................................................ 410,069 410,069 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ........................... 41,066 41,066 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 14,618,160 14,788,852 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [170,692 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 14,630 14,630 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............. 17,602,036 17,409,390 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

002 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,473 1,473 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

003 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 2,076 2,076 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

004 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .................................................. 11,019 11,019 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

014 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .......................................... 19,952 19,952 

015 GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .......................... 5,324 5,324 

016 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................ 2,955 2,955 

017 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 54,743 54,743 

018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 174,805 174,805 

019 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ...................... 3,429 3,429 

020 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................... 500,932 84,932 

Transfer to MPAF–16 .................................................................. [–416,000 ] 

021 PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................. 1,788 1,788 

022 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ..................................................... 24,085 24,085 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

023 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 11,537 11,537 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

024 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 14,542 14,542 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

025 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ....... 1,444 1,444 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
444 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

026 EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................... 971 971 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

027 OTHER CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 974 974 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION 

AGENCY 

028 VEHICLES .......................................................................................... 200 200 

029 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 12,806 12,806 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DTSA 

030 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 447 447 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

033 THAAD ................................................................................................ 833,150 709,150 

Excess to production capacity ..................................................... [–124,000 ] 

034 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................ 565,393 565,393 

035 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS .............................................................. 380,195 380,195 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

043 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......... 5,787 5,787 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

045 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ............................................................. 47,123 47,123 

046 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ........................................ 20,176 20,176 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

047 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS .............................................................. 29,729 29,729 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

048 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ............................................................ 31,974 31,974 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

048A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 554,408 541,088 

Classified adjustment .................................................................. [–13,320 ] 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

049 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................... 41,411 41,411 

051 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .......................................... 171,456 145,456 

Maintain fiscal year 2011 production rate due to extended 

modification periods.

[–26,000 ] 

052 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ........................................................... 272,623 217,623 

AvFID Funding ahead of need ................................................... [–45,000 ] 

AvFID rotary-wing simulator ..................................................... [–10,000 ] 

054 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 5,100 5,100 

055 MH–47 CHINOOK .............................................................................. 142,783 142,783 

056 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ........................................ 486 486 

057 CV–22 MODIFICATION .................................................................... 118,002 118,002 

058 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 3,025 3,025 

059 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 3,024 3,024 

060 RQ–7 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .......................................... 450 450 

061 STUASL0 ............................................................................................ 12,276 12,276 

062 AC/MC–130J ...................................................................................... 74,891 74,891 

063 C–130 MODIFICATIONS .................................................................. 19,665 19,665 

064 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ....................................................................... 6,207 6,207 

SHIPBUILDING 

065 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ............................................................... 6,999 6,999 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

067 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ..................................................... 116,009 106,009 

Prior year funding carryover ...................................................... [–10,000 ] 

068 ORDNANCE ACQUISITION ............................................................. 28,281 18,281 

Aviation ammunition—prior year funding carryover ............... [–10,000 ] 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

069 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS .......... 87,489 150,289 

Program Growth .......................................................................... [62,800 ] 

070 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 74,702 74,702 

071 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 9,196 9,196 

072 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ...... 15,621 15,621 

076 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .................................................... 6,899 66,899 

Program Growth .......................................................................... [60,000 ] 

077 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 594 594 

078 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 33,915 33,915 

080 MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION SYSTEMS ............... 46,242 46,242 

081 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 50,000 20,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
445 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Reduction to growth ..................................................................... [–30,000 ] 

082 MILCON COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT ........................................... 18,723 18,723 

085 AUTOMATION SYSTEMS ................................................................ 51,232 51,232 

086 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .......................... 7,782 7,782 

087 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ................. 22,960 22,960 

088 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS ................. 362 362 

089 VISUAL AUGMENTATION LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS 15,758 15,758 

090 TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS .......................................................... 76,459 101,459 

Program Increase ......................................................................... [25,000 ] 

093 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ................................................... 1,895 1,895 

094 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 246,893 246,893 

095 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ................ 4,142 4,142 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

095A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 4,012 4,012 

CBDP 

096 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ........................................ 15,900 15,900 

097 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ............................................................ 71,376 71,376 

098 DECONTAMINATION ....................................................................... 6,466 6,466 

099 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ............................ 11,143 4,143 

Next Generation Diagnostic System ahead of need ................... [–7,000 ] 

100 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ........................................................... 9,414 9,414 

101 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE .................................................... 139,948 139,948 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 5,365,248 4,821,728 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ........................ 100,000 0 

Unjustified Requirement ............................................................. [–100,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

100,000 0 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

007 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................. 100,000 

Program Increase ......................................................................... [100,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT.100,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ..................................................... 111,453,792 103,579,366 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS 

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

002 C–12 CARGO AIRPLANE .................................................................. 10,500 0 

No justified requirement .............................................................. [–10,500 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 550,798 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [550,798 ] 

ROTARY 

008 AH–64 BLOCK II/WRA ..................................................................... 35,500 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–35,500 ] 

012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ......................................... 72,000 72,000 

017 KIOWA WARRIOR UPGRADE (OH–58 D)/WRA ............................ 145,500 100,800 

Limit ramp rate on replacement aircraft by reducing four aircraft.[–44,700 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

019 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS ..................................................................... 10,800 146,983 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
446 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [136,183 ] 

022 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ............................................. 54,500 54,500 

033 RQ–7 UAV MODS .............................................................................. 94,600 14,800 

Vader - Incompatible with Host Platform .................................. [–79,800 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARE PARTS (AIR) ......................................................................... 0 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................. 423,400 939,881 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

004 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 107,556 107,556 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

009 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 19,000 19,000 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................... 126,556 126,556 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

019 MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL ............................................... 31,102 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [31,102 ] 

020 LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN ............................ 5,427 5,427 

029 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION 

(CRO.

14,890 14,890 

031 HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) ........................................................ 13,066 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [13,066 ] 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

033 M4 CARBINE MODS ......................................................................... 16,800 16,800 

034 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 0 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY ................ 37,117 81,285 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 1,200 1,200 

009 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 4,800 4,800 

010 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 38,000 38,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

013 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 8,000 8,000 

014 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 49,140 49,140 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

019 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ........................ 10,000 10,000 

ARTILLERY FUZES 

022 ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES ................................................... 5,000 5,000 

ROCKETS 

027 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................. 5,000 5,000 

028 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 53,841 53,841 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

029 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 16,000 16,000 

031 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 7,000 7,000 

032 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ............................................................. 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

036 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 2,000 2,000 

037 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 400 400 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .... 208,381 208,381 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

005 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) ........................... 11,094 11,094 

007 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ................... 47,214 47,214 

010 MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY ...................................... 0 

015 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ............... 0 

017 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ...... 0 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

023 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ............................................. 3,600 3,600 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

025 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK .................... 547 547 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
447 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

039 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ............................................... 450 0 

Handheld, Manpack, Small Form-fit radios for LEMV#2 

early to need.

[–450 ] 

042 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS - OPA2 ....................................................... 8,141 8,141 

049 GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) ...................................... 44,100 10,100 

Concurrent development and procurement ................................ [–34,000 ] 

051 MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE (MC4) ................ 6,443 6,443 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

056 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP .............. 54,730 0 

Army requested transfer to line 56a, Family of Biometrics ...... [–54,730 ] 

056A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS ............................................................... 54,730 

Transfer from line 56 .................................................................. [54,730 ] 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

058 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS .......................................... 5,000 5,000 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM( 169,500 169,500 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

070 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 83,000 83,000 

072 TROJAN (MIP) ................................................................................... 61,100 61,100 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

076 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................. 54,100 54,100 

079 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITES ..... 53,000 53,000 

080 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.48,600 24,200 

ISR Task Force identified excess ................................................ [–20,000 ] 

Platforms unavailable ................................................................. [–4,400 ] 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

084 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ........................................ 10,000 10,000 

090 COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-RAM) ............ 0 

092 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM ................................... 0 

095 PROFILER .......................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ...................... 30,400 30,400 

098 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................... 148,335 148,335 

102 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 110,548 110,548 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

105 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ........................................................... 15,081 15,081 

106 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (BC 10,000 10,000 

108 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............... 28,000 28,000 

109 KNIGHT FAMILY .............................................................................. 42,000 42,000 

114 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 32,800 32,800 

115 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ....................................... 44,000 44,000 

116 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................... 18,000 18,000 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

121 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP .................................. 10,000 10,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

127A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 795 795 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

128 PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS .................................................................. 11,472 11,472 

129 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ....................... 30,000 10,000 

Acoustic Hailing Device contract delay ...................................... [–20,000 ] 

130 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ................................................. 0 

131 CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION ...................................................... 1,200 1,200 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

133 TACTICAL BRIDGING ...................................................................... 15,000 15,000 

134 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ........................................... 26,900 26,900 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

137 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ......................... 0 

138 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ... 3,205 3,205 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

149 FORCE PROVIDER ........................................................................... 68,000 68,000 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

158 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ....................................................... 15,011 15,011 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
448 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

159 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .................... 25,129 25,129 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

180 ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM ..................................... 1,800 1,800 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

189 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............ 43,000 22,000 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–21,000 ] 

190 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ..................................... 4,900 4,900 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ....................... 1,398,195 1,298,345 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND 

NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ................................................................ 1,368,800 1,275,800 

BAA S&T Response—unjustified request ................................... [–76,000 ] 

Information Fusion—unjustified program growth .................... [–17,000 ] 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ..................................................................... 961,200 811,200 

Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–150,000 ] 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE .......................................................................... 247,500 224,450 

Train the Force Response—unjustified program growth .......... [–18,050 ] 

Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–5,000 ] 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .................................................................................... 199,134 

Civilian Pay Freeze ...................................................................... [–1,500 ] 

Transfer from Base: Operations .................................................. [220,634 ] 

Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–20,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT 

FUND.

2,577,500 2,510,584 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 UH–1Y/AH–1Z ................................................................................... 30,000 24,875 

Excessive unit cost growth ........................................................... [–5,125 ] 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ....................................................................... 163,500 0 

Combat loss funded in fiscal year 2011 ..................................... [–163,500 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT ........................................................ 21,882 0 

Aircraft excess to requirement ..................................................... [–21,882 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 53,100 45,600 

Intrepid Tiger ............................................................................... [–7,500 ] 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 53,485 53,485 

032 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 46,992 46,992 

034 AH–1W SERIES .................................................................................. 39,418 37,918 

ANVIS HUD install kit pricing .................................................. [–1,500 ] 

035 H–53 SERIES ..................................................................................... 70,747 63,747 

Excess hardware support ............................................................ [–2,000 ] 

Excess NRE for Blue Force Tracker modifications .................... [–5,000 ] 

037 H–1 SERIES ....................................................................................... 6,420 0 

Top-owl modification funding ..................................................... [–6,420 ] 

038 EP–3 SERIES ..................................................................................... 20,800 20,800 

043 C–130 SERIES .................................................................................... 59,625 44,225 

LAIRCM install unit cost ............................................................ [–5,200 ] 

Targeting Sight Systems exceed requirement ............................ [–10,200 ] 

045 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ............................................... 25,880 18,280 

Excess C–20G installation NRE ................................................. [–4,000 ] 

UC–12W excess to need ................................................................ [–3,600 ] 

048 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 11,184 11,184 

053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 27,200 24,200 

Other support excess .................................................................... [–3,000 ] 

054 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 13,467 11,467 

OSIP 10–11 other support growth .............................................. [–2,000 ] 

055 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ................................. 3,300 3,300 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
449 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

060 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ............................................. 30,000 25,500 

Deficiencies modifications other support growth ....................... [–2,500 ] 

Reliability modifications other support growth ......................... [–2,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 39,060 34,462 

MQ–8 spares excess to requirement ............................................ [–3,631 ] 

Other Support Aircraft spares .................................................... [–967 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

062 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 10,800 10,800 

064 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 0 

065 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 4,100 4,100 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 730,960 480,935 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 14,000 14,000 

010 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) ....... 20,000 20,000 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 7,070 7,070 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 41,070 41,070 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 80,200 80,200 

004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 22,400 22,400 

007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 20,000 20,000 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 182 182 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 4,545 4,545 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 1,656 1,656 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 6,000 6,000 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 19,575 19,575 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 6,691 6,691 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 12,184 12,184 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 10,988 10,988 

019 81MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 24,515 24,515 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 11,227 11,227 

021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................... 802 802 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 5,911 5,911 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 18,871 18,871 

024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 57,003 57,003 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 7,831 7,831 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 5,177 5,177 

027 NON LETHALS .................................................................................. 712 712 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 630 630 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ....... 317,100 317,100 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

SMALL BOATS 

023 STANDARD BOATS .......................................................................... 13,729 0 

Coastal force protection boats contract delay ............................. [–13,729 ] 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

056 MATCALS ........................................................................................... 7,232 0 

Radar upgrade - Transfer to Title I ........................................... [–7,232 ] 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

066 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS .............................................. 4,000 0 

Unjustified request for tech refresh upgrades ............................ [–4,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

092 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ........................................................ 47,000 47,000 

095 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................ 10,800 10,800 

097 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ............................................................. 14,000 14,000 

101 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 18,226 18,226 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

112 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................. 7,500 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
450 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Naval Intelligence Fusion Tool—Transfer to Title I ................. [–7,500 ] 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

116 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP ............................... 15,700 15,700 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 2,628 2,628 

123 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP ............................... 13,290 13,290 

124 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 3,672 3,672 

128 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION ........................................................... 1,002 1,002 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

130 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ........................................ 3,644 3,644 

TRAINING DEVICES 

134 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 5,789 0 

Funding No Longer Required ..................................................... [–5,789 ] 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 3,310 3,310 

140 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................... 6,977 6,977 

141 C4ISR EQUIPMENT .......................................................................... 24,762 24,762 

143 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 78,241 70,641 

Intelligence Kits - Funding No Longer Required Due to Force 

Structure Reductions.

[–7,600 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

149 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 473 473 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ........................ 281,975 236,125 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

002 LAV PIP ............................................................................................... 23,962 23,962 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................... 16,000 16,000 

005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ...................... 10,488 10,488 

006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .... 27,373 27,373 

GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ............................................................................................. 2,527 2,527 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 59,730 59,730 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 19,040 19,040 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 2,331 2,331 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................... 3,090 3,090 

019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ................................................... 5,236 5,236 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 26,506 26,506 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

021 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 35 35 

022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 47,132 47,132 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 9,850 9,850 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 18,629 18,629 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .......................................................... 31,491 31,491 

031 RADIO SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 87,027 87,027 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................. 54,177 124,177 

Data distribution system modules .............................................. [50,000 ] 

Digital technical control shelters ................................................ [20,000 ] 

033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ......................... 2,200 2,200 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS ...................................... 95,800 95,800 

038 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ........................ 392,391 174,391 

Marine Corps requested transfer to line 32 for Data Distribution System.[–50,000 ] 

Marine Corps requested transfer to line 32 for Digital Technical Control System.[–20,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
451 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Marine Corps requested transfer to line 39 for LVSR .............. [–148,000 ] 

039 LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP ............................................. 38,382 38,382 

040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ................................................ 24,826 24,826 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

043 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 18,775 18,775 

044 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 7,361 7,361 

046 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 51,895 106,895 

Advanced power sources .............................................................. [20,000 ] 

Mobile power equipment .............................................................. [35,000 ] 

048 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 57,237 57,237 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

049 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 42,900 42,900 

051 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ...................................................... 42,553 42,553 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

053 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 8,307 8,307 

054 TRAINING DEVICES ........................................................................ 5,200 5,200 

055 CONTAINER FAMILY ....................................................................... 12 12 

056 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................... 28,533 28,533 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................... 1,260,996 1,167,996 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

HELICOPTERS 

019 V22 OSPREY ...................................................................................... 70,000 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–70,000 ] 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

024 HH–60M .............................................................................................. 39,300 39,300 

027 STUASL0 ............................................................................................ 2,472 2,472 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

034 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 719,592 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [719,592 ] 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

043 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 59,299 59,299 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

059 MC–12W .............................................................................................. 17,300 17,300 

063 C–130 ................................................................................................... 164,041 164,041 

064 C–130 INTEL ...................................................................................... 4,600 4,600 

065 C–130J MODS .................................................................................... 27,983 27,983 

067 COMPASS CALL MODS ................................................................... 12,000 12,000 

075 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ....................................................... 34,000 34,000 

076 OTHER MODIFICATIONS ............................................................... 15,000 15,000 

077 MQ–1 MODS ....................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 

AIRCRAFT SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

081 FIGHTER/UAV INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .................... 2,800 2,800 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

090 C–17A ................................................................................................... 10,970 10,970 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

099 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 87,220 

Transfer from Base ...................................................................... [87,220 ] 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

100 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 23,000 23,000 

DARP 

104 U–2 ....................................................................................................... 42,300 13,400 

Sensors .......................................................................................... [–28,900 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....... 527,865 1,235,777 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 329 329 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 8,014 8,014 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 17,385 17,385 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 34,100 34,100 

FLARE, IR MJU–7B 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
452 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) ................................. 1,200 1,200 

FUZES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 11,217 11,217 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................. 8,765 8,765 

SMALL ARMS 

013 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 11,500 11,500 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

92,510 92,510 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 16,120 16,120 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 12,300 12,300 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......... 28,420 28,420 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 2,658 0 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–2,658 ] 

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES 

004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (CARGO ....................................... 32,824 0 

Unjustified request ....................................................................... [–32,824 ] 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SPECIA ...................................... 110 110 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................... 1,662 1,662 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 ....................................................... 772 772 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M BASE MAINT/CONST ......................... 13,983 13,983 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

013 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY ............................................... 500 500 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 1,800 1,800 

025 TAC SIGNIT SPT ............................................................................... 7,020 7,020 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM .............................. 25,920 25,920 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 9,445 9,445 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES .............................................................. 12,900 12,900 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 18,100 18,100 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 9,800 9,800 

062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (BASE S) ...................................... 8,400 8,400 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................. 3,000 3,000 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ........................... 64,400 64,400 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 2,991,347 2,910,698 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [–80,649 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............. 3,204,641 3,088,510 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

017 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 3,307 3,307 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

043 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......... 3,000 3,000 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

046 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ........................................ 8,300 8,300 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

048A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 101,548 96,548 

Program adjustment .................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
453 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

050 MH–47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM ......................... 40,500 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–40,500 ] 

051 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .......................................... 7,800 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–7,800 ] 

052 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ........................................................... 8,500 8,500 

057 CV–22 MODIFICATION .................................................................... 15,000 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–15,000 ] 

063 C–130 MODIFICATIONS .................................................................. 4,800 4,800 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

067 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ..................................................... 71,659 71,659 

068 ORDNANCE ACQUISITION ............................................................. 25,400 15,400 

Prior year funding carryover ...................................................... [–10,000 ] 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

069 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS .......... 2,325 2,325 

070 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 43,558 49,058 

Village Stability Operations [VSO] unfunded requirement ...... [5,500 ] 

071 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 6,488 8,488 

VSO unfunded requirement ........................................................ [2,000 ] 

072 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ...... 2,601 2,601 

078 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 15,818 19,818 

VSO unfunded requirement ........................................................ [4,000 ] 

085 AUTOMATION SYSTEMS ................................................................ 13,387 13,387 

087 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ................. 5,800 5,800 

088 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS ................. 34,900 37,500 

VSO unfunded requirement ........................................................ [2,600 ] 

089 VISUAL AUGMENTATION LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS 3,531 3,531 

090 TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS .......................................................... 2,894 2,894 

093 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ................................................... 7,220 7,220 

094 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 41,632 41,632 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 469,968 405,768 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ........................ 100,000 0 

Unjustified Requirement ............................................................. [–100,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

100,000 0 

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND 

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND 

001 MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND ......................... 3,195,170 2,600,170 

Funds previously provided by Department of Army in FY11 ... [–595,000 ] 

TOTAL MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH 

FUND.

3,195,170 2,600,170 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

007 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................. 225,000 

Program Increase ......................................................................... [225,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT.225,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ..................................................... 15,021,824 15,084,413 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
454 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH.21,064 21,064 

002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 213,942 213,942 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 80,977 80,977 

004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 120,937 120,937 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 436,920 436,920 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 30,258 30,258 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY ........... 43,521 43,521 

007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP ...................................................................... 14,230 14,230 

008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 44,610 44,610 

009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 15,790 15,790 

010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 50,685 50,685 

011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ........................... 20,034 20,034 

012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION .................. 20,933 20,933 

013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY.64,306 64,306 

014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 59,214 59,214 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING 

TECHNOLOGY.

4,877 4,877 

016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM ................... 8,244 8,244 

017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................ 39,813 39,813 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ............... 62,962 62,962 

019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 57,203 55,203 

Program growth adjustment .......................................... [–2,000 ] 

020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS ................................................ 20,280 20,280 

021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ..... 21,801 21,801 

022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ................ 20,837 20,837 

023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.26,116 26,116 

024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ............... 8,591 8,591 

025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY .................... 80,317 80,317 

026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 18,946 18,946 

027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 29,835 29,835 

028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 105,929 105,929 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 869,332 867,332 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................... 52,979 52,979 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................ 68,171 68,171 

031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................... 62,193 62,193 

032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.77,077 77,077 

033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

106,145 106,145 

034 0603006A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.5,312 5,312 

035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.10,298 10,298 

036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 57,963 57,963 

037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE ................................................................... 8,155 8,155 

038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS.17,936 17,936 

039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE .................................................................. 12,597 12,597 

040 0603105A MILITARY HIV RESEARCH ............................................... 6,796 6,796 

041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.12,191 12,191 

042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................... 4,278 4,278 

043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS .................................................................. 2,261 2,261 

044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 23,677 23,677 

045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ... 90,602 90,602 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
455 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE .................................................................. 10,315 10,315 

047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.183,150 183,150 

048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

31,541 31,541 

049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM ................... 7,686 7,686 

050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................. 42,414 42,414 

051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.15,959 15,959 

052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.36,516 36,516 

053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND 

SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.

30,600 30,600 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.976,812 976,812 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

055 0603305A ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION(NON SPACE).21,126 9,126 

Excess growth and delays .............................................. [–12,000 ] 

055A 0603XXXA INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION ......................................... 14,883 14,883 

056 0603308A ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 

(SPACE).

9,612 9,612 

058 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV ....... 35,383 19,293 

Excess to Army requirement .......................................... [–16,090 ] 

059 0603627A SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING 

SYS-ADV DEV.

9,501 4,501 

Program growth adjustment .......................................... [–5,000 ] 

060 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ............. 39,693 39,693 

061 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ......... 101,408 64,408 

Program growth adjustment .......................................... [–37,000 ] 

062 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY ................... 9,747 3,843 

Rapid Equipping Force- Lack of baseline requirement [–5,904 ] 

063 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM— 

ADV DEV.

5,766 5,766 

065 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ................ 4,946 4,946 

066 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL 297,955 182,955 

Program reduction Increment III .................................. [–115,000 ] 

067 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 4,765 4,765 

068 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ......................................................... 7,107 7,107 

069 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 19,509 12,509 

Army requested transfer LAMPS to RDTE Army line 

109.

[–7,000 ] 

070 0603805A COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT CONTROL SYSTEM 

EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS.

5,258 5,258 

071 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ....................................... 34,997 34,997 

072 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .... 19,598 19,598 

073 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ............................ 1,496 1,496 

074 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ................. 10,181 10,181 

075 0604131A TRACTOR JUTE ................................................................... 15,609 15,609 

076 0604284A JOINT COOPERATIVE TARGET IDENTIFICATION— 

GROUND (JCTI-G) / TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPME.

41,652 15,052 

Army offered program reduction ................................... [–26,600 ] 

077 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................ 42,892 42,892 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.753,084 528,490 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

078 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................... 144,687 119,687 

JTRS AMF delays and JPALS excessive growth ......... [–25,000 ] 

079 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................ 166,132 82,442 

Army offered program reduction ................................... [–83,690 ] 

080 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 101,265 34,265 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
456 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Army offered program reduction ................................... [–67,000 ] 

082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ................................... 17,412 7,412 

Machine—Foreign Language Translation System contract delay.[–10,000 ] 

083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE .................................................................. 26,577 26,577 

084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ..................................... 73,728 83,474 

S61—High concurrency of incremental efforts ............. [–8,000 ] 

Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 17 ............. [16,046 ] 

Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 20 ............. [1,700 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ....................................... 3,961 3,961 

087 0604611A JAVELIN ................................................................................ 17,340 9,940 

Excess to requirement ..................................................... [–7,400 ] 

088 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES .................... 5,478 5,478 

089 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .................................................... 22,922 22,922 

090 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES ....................... 20,000 

Army requested transfer from RDTE line 109 ............. [20,000 ] 

093 0604661A FCS SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS ENGR & PROGRAM 

MGMT.

383,872 298,872 

Unjustified requirement ................................................. [–85,000 ] 

095 0604663A FCS UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES .......................... 143,840 36,000 

Program adjustment ....................................................... [–107,840 ] 

096 0604664A FCS UNATTENDED GROUND SENSORS ....................... 499 0 

Program termination ...................................................... [–499 ] 

098 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—SDD ...................................... 59,265 59,265 

099 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT ... 2,075 2,075 

100 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—SDD .................... 30,021 30,021 

101 0604716A TERRAIN INFORMATION—SDD ...................................... 1,596 1,596 

102 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—SDD.83,010 83,010 

103 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.28,305 28,305 

104 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT ...... 14,375 14,375 

105 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)— 

SDD.

15,803 15,803 

107 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 22,226 22,226 

108 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—SDD ................................ 13,828 13,828 

109 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—SDD ........ 251,104 173,311 

Army request transfer from RDTE line 69 ................... [7,000 ] 

Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 90 .......... [–20,000 ] 

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Schedule Slip .................. [–64,793 ] 

110 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—SDD.137,811 81,811 

Excessive growth Joint Battle Command-Platform ..... [–56,000 ] 

111 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—SDD.27,160 27,160 

112 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—SDD ........................ 87,426 76,326 

Explosive Hazard Pre-Detonation (EHP) Roller contract delay.[–11,100 ] 

113 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS ................................................... 42,627 37,627 

Program growth adjustment .......................................... [–5,000 ] 

115 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE.123,935 93,935 

Excessive Growth ............................................................ [–30,000 ] 

116 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 2,890 2,890 

117 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM 

(GFEBS).

794 794 

118 0604823A FIREFINDER ........................................................................ 10,358 10,358 

119 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL .................. 48,309 61,409 

Transfer at Army request from OPA line 147 .............. [13,100 ] 

120 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS ....................................................... 120,146 120,146 

121 0604869A PATRIOT/MEADS COMBINED AGGREGATE PROGRAM (CAP).406,605 390,000 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–16,605 ] 

122 0604870A NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL MONITORING SENSOR 

NETWORK.

7,398 7,398 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
457 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

123 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 37,098 32,098 

Unjustified cost growth .................................................. [–5,000 ] 

124 0605018A ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMHRS).68,693 68,693 

125 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) .................... 127,095 127,095 

126 0605455A SLAMRAAM .......................................................................... 19,931 1,531 

Excess to program termination requirements ............... [–18,400 ] 

127 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE ......................................................... 88,993 88,993 

128 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

(AIAMD).

270,607 270,607 

129 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE ........................................... 884,387 449,387 

Excessive Technology Ramp-up prior to completion of 

Analysis of Alternatives.

[–435,000 ] 

130 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR .............................................. 31,465 31,465 

131 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 ................................................................... 3,920 3,920 

132 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 13,819 13,819 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.4,190,788 3,192,307 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

133 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 16,992 16,992 

134 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 11,247 11,247 

135 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 49,437 49,437 

136 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER ................................................... 20,384 20,384 

137 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL ................................................ 145,606 145,606 

138 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ................ 28,800 28,800 

139 0605502A SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH ............... 0 

140 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ......................... 262,456 312,456 

Program Increase ............................................................ [50,000 ] 

141 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND 

TARGETS.

70,227 70,227 

142 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ...................... 43,483 43,483 

143 0605605A DOD HIGH ENERGY LASER TEST FACILITY ............... 18 18 

144 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION ............................................. 5,630 5,630 

145 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES.7,182 7,182 

146 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ..................................... 19,669 19,669 

147 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ............................. 5,445 5,445 

148 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ......................... 68,786 68,786 

149 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER .......................................... 63,302 63,302 

150 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION 

& INTEG.

3,420 3,420 

151 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................ 83,054 83,054 

152 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES ..................... 63,872 58,872 

Program Reduction ......................................................... [–5,000 ] 

153 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS 

AND SAFETY.

57,142 57,142 

154 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT 

SUPPORT.

4,961 4,961 

155 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 17,558 17,558 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 1,048,671 1,093,671 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

158 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............... 66,641 66,641 

159 0603820A WEAPONS CAPABILITY MODIFICATIONS UAV ........... 24,142 7,500 

Excess funds only to the analysis of alternatives ......... [–16,642 ] 

160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ............................ 344,655 327,855 

Excess program growth .................................................. [–16,800 ] 

162 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .... 29,546 29,546 

163 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ........ 53,307 36,207 

AMPV .............................................................................. [–17,100 ] 

164 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ..................................... 65,002 42,414 

Unjustified program growth .......................................... [–22,588 ] 

165 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.163,205 149,705 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
458 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Excess funds to Black Hawk Recapitalization/Modernization for analysis of alternatives.[–13,500 ] 

166 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

823 823 

167 0203758A DIGITIZATION ..................................................................... 8,029 8,029 

169 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

44,560 54,560 

Transfer at Army Request from MPA line 13 ............... [10,000 ] 

171 0203808A TRACTOR CARD .................................................................. 42,554 42,554 

172 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ............................. 27,630 27,630 

173 0208058A JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ............................. 3,044 3,044 

175 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES .............. 2,854 2,854 

176 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 61,220 61,220 

177 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 100,505 160,745 

Army requested transfer for AESIP from OPA line 

116.

[13,000 ] 

Army requested transfer for GCSS-Army from OPA 

line 116.

[47,240 ] 

178 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ............... 12,104 12,104 

179 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.23,937 23,937 

181 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 40,650 26,550 

Contract award delays ................................................... [–14,100 ] 

182 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.44,198 31,699 

Unjustified requirements growth ................................... [–12,499 ] 

183 0305219A MQ–1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV ............................................. 137,038 122,038 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–15,000 ] 

184 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 1,938 1,938 

185 0305233A RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 31,940 31,940 

187 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE ...................... 15,018 15,018 

188 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES.59,297 59,297 

188A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 4,536 4,536 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.1,408,373 1,350,384 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, ARMY.

9,683,980 8,445,916 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 113,157 113,157 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH.18,092 18,092 

003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 446,123 446,123 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 577,372 577,372 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................ 104,804 104,804 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................. 156,901 156,901 

006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ..... 44,845 44,845 

008 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .................... 65,448 65,448 

009 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 101,205 101,205 

010 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH.108,329 108,329 

011 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

50,076 50,076 

012 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH.5,937 5,937 

013 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............... 108,666 108,666 

014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

37,583 37,583 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 783,794 783,794 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
459 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 114,270 114,270 

016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 64,057 45,234 

Excess MRMUAS funding ............................................. [–18,823 ] 

017 0603235N COMMON PICTURE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ......... 49,068 49,068 

018 0603236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.71,232 71,232 

019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.102,535 102,535 

020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION 

(ATD).

124,324 124,324 

021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.11,286 11,286 

022 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.18,119 18,119 

023 0603747N UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .... 37,121 37,121 

024 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS.50,157 50,157 

025 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

6,048 6,048 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.648,217 629,394 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

026 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ........................ 94,972 84,972 

JMAPS unjustified request ............................................ [–10,000 ] 

027 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .............................................. 10,893 10,893 

028 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ....... 3,702 3,702 

029 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................... 10,497 10,497 

030 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 7,915 7,915 

031 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE ................... 5,978 5,978 

032 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY .......... 1,418 1,418 

033 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES.142,657 127,757 

Program execution .......................................................... [–8,900 ] 

UUV program delay ....................................................... [–6,000 ] 

034 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE ............................ 118,764 118,764 

035 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................. 54,072 54,072 

037 0603525N PILOT FISH .......................................................................... 96,012 96,012 

038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 73,421 73,421 

039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................ 130,267 130,267 

040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL ............................................... 1,338 1,338 

041 0603553N SURFACE ASW ..................................................................... 29,797 29,797 

042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ... 856,326 856,326 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ............. 9,253 9,253 

044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN ............................. 14,308 14,308 

045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES.22,213 22,213 

046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ..................... 463,683 463,683 

047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS ........... 18,249 18,249 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ..................................................................... 584,159 584,159 

049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ...................................... 286,784 282,784 

Defer development of Irregular Warfare mission package.[–4,000 ] 

050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ................................... 34,157 34,157 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 4,753 4,753 

052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ........................... 12,000 12,000 

053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM.79,858 54,981 

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Schedule Slip .................. [–24,877 ] 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.33,654 33,654 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
460 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ........................................ 54,783 54,783 

056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.9,996 9,996 

057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .................................... 21,714 21,714 

058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................ 70,538 70,538 

059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ............................................ 3,754 3,754 

060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ..................................................................... 79,415 79,415 

061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY .................................... 4,137 4,137 

062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ................................................................ 276,383 276,383 

063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................. 52,721 52,721 

064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ..................................................................... 160,964 150,964 

Classified adjustment ..................................................... [–10,000 ] 

066 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................. 144,985 144,985 

067 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................ 43,704 43,704 

068 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 9,140 9,140 

069 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 421 421 

070 0603851M NONLETHAL WEAPONS .................................................... 40,992 40,992 

071 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS.121,455 118,255 

Excess management services funding ............................ [–3,200 ] 

075 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM).64,107 64,107 

076 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ...................... 711 711 

077 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW).62,044 62,044 

078 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.22,665 3,450 

Excess support funding .................................................. [–1,000 ] 

FMU–164 fuze program termination ............................ [–18,215 ] 

079 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT.33,621 33,621 

080 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ........................... 1,078 1,078 

082 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .......... 625 625 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.4,481,053 4,394,861 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

083 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 35,651 42,651 

Navy requested transfer from line 98 for VH–3/VH– 

60 sustainment.

[7,000 ] 

084 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................... 30,676 30,676 

085 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .......................................... 51,191 49,491 

Collision avoidance safety program delay .................... [–1,700 ] 

086 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT.17,673 17,673 

087 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING .................... 5,922 5,922 

088 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ................................... 3,417 3,417 

089 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM ......................................... 9,944 9,944 

090 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM ....................................... 81,257 77,257 

NTCSS--reduce program growth ................................... [–4,000 ] 

091 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ....................................................... 110,994 110,994 

092 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................... 72,569 67,569 

Development support funding growth ........................... [–5,000 ] 

093 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ........................................ 56,509 48,898 

High Altitude ASW program delay ............................... [–1,611 ] 

Management services funding growth ........................... [–6,000 ] 

094 0604262N V–22A ..................................................................................... 84,477 84,477 

095 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................... 3,249 3,249 

096 0604269N EA–18 ..................................................................................... 17,100 17,100 

097 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 89,418 89,418 

098 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ................ 180,070 60,770 

Early to need ................................................................... [–76,300 ] 

Navy requested transfer to APN line 47 ....................... [–24,000 ] 

Navy requested transfer to APN line 62 ....................... [–12,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
461 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Navy requested transfer to line 83 ................................ [–7,000 ] 

099 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ............................. 189,919 170,919 

Technology Development late contract award .............. [–19,000 ] 

100 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRSNAVY).688,146 676,146 

HMS capability enhancements unjustified request ...... [–60,000 ] 

Management services funding growth ........................... [–3,000 ] 

Transfer from OP,A line 39 for GMR correction of deficiencies.[51,000 ] 

101 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING.223,283 223,283 

102 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ...................... 884 884 

103 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ..................................... 47,635 29,635 

Defer Integration on Joint Strike Fighter ..................... [–18,000 ] 

104 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ......................... 46,705 46,705 

105 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM ................................................................. 41,142 41,142 

106 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER 

AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.

24,898 24,898 

107 0604404N FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM.121,150 75,700 

Delay to Technology Development contract award ....... [–45,450 ] 

108 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ........................... 60,790 60,790 

108A 0604XXXN AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR ............................. 166,568 166,568 

109 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION .................. 100,591 95,671 

TB–33 program cancellation .......................................... [–4,920 ] 

110 0604504N AIR CONTROL ...................................................................... 5,521 5,521 

111 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS .................................. 45,445 45,445 

112 0604518N COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION ....... 3,400 3,400 

113 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN .............................................................. 97,235 97,235 

114 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ................ 48,466 48,466 

115 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E ................. 161,099 121,099 

Ship-to-Shore Connector--contract award delay ........... [–40,000 ] 

116 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES .................. 3,848 3,848 

117 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 3,933 3,933 

118 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT .................. 32,592 32,592 

119 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.9,960 9,960 

120 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND 

HUMAN FACTORS.

12,992 12,992 

121 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS ......................... 7,506 7,506 

122 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) ............. 71,222 71,222 

123 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ............. 6,631 6,631 

124 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ...... 184,095 184,095 

125 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ...................................... 2,217 2,217 

126 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................ 12,984 12,984 

127 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM ................................................ 50,178 39,378 

Mode 5 program delay ................................................... [–10,800 ] 

128 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ........................... 670,723 651,786 

Block IV development ahead of need ............................. [–18,937 ] 

129 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) ........................................ 677,486 658,549 

Block IV development ahead of need ............................. [–18,937 ] 

130 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 27,461 19,461 

Prgram underexecution .................................................. [–8,000 ] 

131 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 58,764 29,764 

Reduction to fourth quarter contract awards ............... [–29,000 ] 

132 0605018N NAVY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES 

SYSTEM (N-IMHRS).

55,050 55,050 

133 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ....................................................................... 629,461 624,461 

Management services funding growth ........................... [–5,000 ] 

135 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) .................... 118,395 108,395 

Program delay ................................................................ [–10,000 ] 

136 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ........... 622,713 608,713 

Increment 3–-development ahead of need ..................... [–14,000 ] 

138 0204202N DDG–1000 .............................................................................. 261,604 257,604 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
462 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Government technical services growth .......................... [–4,000 ] 

139 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ............................ 979 979 

141 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ............................. 31,740 31,740 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.6,475,528 6,086,873 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

142 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 28,318 28,318 

143 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 44,700 44,700 

144 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 37,957 37,957 

145 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION.2,970 2,970 

146 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ................ 23,454 17,454 

Reduction to growth ....................................................... [–6,000 ] 

147 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES .................................... 47,127 47,127 

148 0605502N SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH ............... 10 10 

149 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ........................ 571 571 

150 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL 

SUPPORT.

68,301 58,301 

OASUW--defer new start ................................................ [–10,000 ] 

151 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ............................... 3,277 3,277 

152 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT.73,917 73,917 

153 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ....................... 136,531 136,531 

154 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ............................... 335,367 335,367 

155 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY.16,634 16,634 

156 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) 

SUPPORT.

4,228 4,228 

157 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 7,642 7,642 

158 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ................ 25,655 25,655 

159 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES ......................... 2,764 2,764 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 859,423 843,423 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

164 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

198,298 198,298 

165 0604717M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ......... 400 400 

166 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS .................................... 1,650 1,650 

167 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ..... 88,873 88,873 

168 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ................. 33,553 33,553 

169 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 6,360 6,360 

170 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 23,208 23,208 

171 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) .................... 30,021 30,021 

172 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS .......................................................... 151,030 145,161 

Radar upgrade program delay ...................................... [–5,869 ] 

173 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................ 6,696 6,696 

174 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ............. 1,739 1,739 

175 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................... 3,377 3,377 

176 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING 

CENTER (TMPC).

8,819 8,819 

177 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ....................... 21,259 21,259 

178 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT).5,214 5,214 

179 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.42,244 42,244 

180 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT .................................. 1,447 1,447 

181 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 18,142 18,142 

182 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ...................................................... 11,147 11,147 

183 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ..................................................... 69,224 69,224 

184 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ...... 22,010 22,010 

185 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP ...................................................................... 39,288 39,288 

186 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ............................................. 123,012 100,423 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
463 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Cancelation of Multi-Purpose Bomb Racks Program ... [–22,589 ] 

187 0205658N NAVY SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ..................... 1,957 1,957 

188 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ............... 82,705 82,705 

189 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ......... 320,864 320,864 

190 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING 

ARMS SYSTEMS.

209,396 184,396 

Amphibious Combat Vehicle (non-add) 

Excess funds for Marine Personnel Carrier & AAV 

Upgrade.

[–25,000 ] 

191 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ......... 45,172 27,072 

Program execution .......................................................... [–18,100 ] 

192 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE 

SYSTEMS (MIP).

14,101 14,101 

193 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 8,765 8,765 

194 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

2,913 2,913 

195 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ............................. 4,108 4,108 

200 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ..................... 263,712 263,712 

201 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE 

SERVICES (CANES).

12,906 24,906 

Transfer from CANES (OPN 68) per USN request ...... [12,000 ] 

202 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 25,229 25,229 

203 0303150M WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.1,250 1,250 

204 0303238N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE 

SERVICES (CANES)—MIP.

6,602 6,602 

206 0305149N COBRA JUDY ........................................................................ 40,605 40,605 

207 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORSSPACE (METOC).904 904 

208 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES.4,099 4,099 

209 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 9,353 9,353 

210 0305206N AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .................... 0 

212 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.23,785 23,785 

213 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.25,487 25,487 

214 0305220N RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 548,482 548,482 

215 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................. 108,248 108,248 

216 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 979 979 

217 0305233N RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 872 872 

219 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .............. 22,698 21,398 

Excess support funding .................................................. [–1,300 ] 

220 0305237N MEDIUM RANGE MARITIME UAS ................................... 15,000 15,000 

221 0305239M RQ–21A ................................................................................... 26,301 24,201 

Program delays ............................................................... [–2,100 ] 

223 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT .................... 8,292 8,292 

224 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 21,609 21,609 

226 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ........................................ 54,031 54,031 

227 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ........................ 5,000 5,000 

227A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 1,308,608 1,306,945 

Classified Adjustment .................................................... [–1,663 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.4,131,044 4,066,423 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, NAVY.

17,956,431 17,382,140 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 364,328 364,328 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 140,273 140,273 

003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES ........ 14,258 14,258 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 518,859 518,859 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
464 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS .......................................................................... 136,230 136,230 

005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES ....................... 147,628 147,628 

006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH ........ 86,663 86,663 

007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ............................................... 207,508 207,508 

008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................... 134,787 134,787 

009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 115,285 115,285 

010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 60,692 60,692 

011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ............................... 111,156 111,156 

012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS.127,866 127,866 

013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ................................. 54,059 54,059 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 1,181,874 1,181,874 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS ..... 39,738 48,238 

Program Increase—Metals Affordability Initiative ...... [8,500 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 5,780 5,780 

016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ............................... 53,075 53,075 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ...................... 67,474 67,474 

018A 0603XXXF FUELS .................................................................................... 6,770 6,770 

018B 0603XXXF POWER TECHNOLOGY ...................................................... 5,747 5,747 

018C 0603XXXF PROPULSION ....................................................................... 80,833 80,833 

018D 0603XXXF ROCKET PROPULSION ...................................................... 27,603 27,603 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY .......................... 22,268 22,268 

020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ..................... 74,636 74,636 

021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) .......... 13,555 13,555 

022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.25,319 25,319 

023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................. 54,042 45,542 

High Velocity Penetrating Weapon—ahead of need ..... [–8,500 ] 

024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ........................... 28,683 28,683 

025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ............. 40,103 40,103 

026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

38,656 38,656 

027 0603924F HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

PROGRAM.

1,122 1,122 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.585,404 585,404 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............. 4,013 4,013 

029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................... 3,586 3,586 

031 0603430F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) ......................... 421,687 401,687 

Excess to need—poor justification ................................. [–20,000 ] 

032 0603432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ........................................... 122,991 102,991 

Development schedule delay .......................................... [–20,000 ] 

033 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY .................................... 45,755 45,755 

034 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY .................. 38,496 38,496 

035 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 4,424 4,424 

036 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ............ 642 642 

037 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) .......................... 9,819 7,319 

Excess to need ................................................................. [–2,500 ] 

038 0603850F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ............................ 20,046 20,046 

039 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ................. 67,202 69,702 

Program increase ............................................................ [2,500 ] 

040 0603854F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM RDT&E (SPACE) .......... 12,804 12,804 

041 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION ............................................... 2,075 2,075 

042 0603860F JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS.20,112 20,112 

043 0604015F NEXT GENERATION BOMBER ......................................... 197,023 197,023 

044 0604283F BATTLE MGMT COM & CTRL SENSOR DEVELOPMENT.60,250 31,250 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
465 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

3DELRR Contract Delays .............................................. [–29,000 ] 

045 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ................................................ 2,553 2,553 

046 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM.38,248 33,248 

Program reduction .......................................................... [–5,000 ] 

047 0604330F JOINT DUAL ROLE AIR DOMINANCE MISSILE .......... 29,759 29,759 

048 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION ........ 24,217 24,217 

049 0604436F NEXT-GENERATION MILSATCOM TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.0 

050 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT 24,467 24,467 

053 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ........................ 86,543 86,543 

054 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................ 2,773 2,773 

055 0305178F NATIONAL POLAR-ORBITING OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE SYSTEM (NPOESS).444,900 43,000 

DWSS program termination .......................................... [–444,900 ] 

Termination liability ...................................................... [43,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.1,684,385 1,208,485 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

056 0603840F GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS) ........................... 5,680 5,680 

057 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT ...................................... 18,538 18,538 

058 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING.21,780 21,780 

059 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 26,880 16,880 

MALD-J Increment 2–-Technology Development Contract Delay.[–10,000 ] 

061 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ................. 52,355 48,105 

CLIP--Contract Delays ................................................... [–1,250 ] 

STRATCOM DNC2 Contract Delays ............................ [–3,000 ] 

062 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................... 51 51 

063 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ..................................... 132,891 132,891 

064 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ............................................. 31,913 31,913 

065 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ................. 273,689 241,089 

Space Based Space Surveillance excess to need ........... [–12,600 ] 

Space Fence—poor justification ..................................... [–20,000 ] 

066 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ................................. 47,100 41,000 

AEA SoS--Contract Delays ............................................. [–2,600 ] 

Electronic Attack Pod--Delayed Start ........................... [–3,500 ] 

067 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH 

EMD.

621,629 621,629 

069 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................... 10,055 7,755 

Universal Armament Interface Contract Delay ............ [–2,300 ] 

070 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS .................................................................. 2,427 2,427 

071 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................ 11,878 7,978 

BEAR--Ahead of Need .................................................... [–3,900 ] 

073 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS ................................................. 11,280 9,280 

Integrated Aircrew Ensemble--Contract Award Delays [–2,000 ] 

074 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .......................................... 28,106 8,106 

Air Combat Training Systems (P5) Upgrades--Contract Delay.[–8,000 ] 

Joint Threat Emitter Increment 2–-Rephased Program [–12,000 ] 

075 0604740F INTEGRATED COMMAND & CONTROL APPLICATIONS (IC2A).10 10 

076 0604750F INTELLIGENCE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 995 995 

077 0604800F JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) ........................................ 1,387,926 1,387,926 

078 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ................. 158,477 148,477 

Support Equipment—contract savings .......................... [–10,000 ] 

079 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE).20,028 15,028 

Program underexecution due to schedule delay ........... [–5,000 ] 

080 0605221F NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT 877,084 877,084 

081 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION .................................. 94,113 11,000 

Budget Adjustment per Air Force Request to APAF–63 [–10,400 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
466 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Budget Adjustment per Air Force Request to APAF–73 [–54,600 ] 

Program Reduction ......................................................... [–18,113 ] 

083 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E .............................................. 27,071 22,071 

Contract Savings ............................................................ [–5,000 ] 

085 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION ....................... 93,867 93,867 

086 0207100F LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE (LAAR) 

SQUADRONS.

23,721 13,721 

Program reduction .......................................................... [–10,000 ] 

088 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .............................. 39,826 29,826 

Block 40/50 Mission Training Center--Excess to need [–10,000 ] 

089 0401138F JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT (JCA) ...................................... 27,089 27,089 

090 0401318F CV–22 ..................................................................................... 20,723 13,223 

Contract Delay ................................................................ [–7,500 ] 

091 0401845F AIRBORNE SENIOR LEADER C3 (SLC3S) ...................... 12,535 0 

Program Termination ..................................................... [–12,535 ] 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.4,079,717 3,855,419 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

092 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 22,420 22,420 

093 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 62,206 62,206 

094 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE ............................................ 27,579 27,579 

096 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ........... 17,767 17,767 

097 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ............................... 654,475 704,475 

Program Increase ............................................................ [50,000 ] 

098 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ....... 158,096 158,096 

099 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ......................................... 47,926 47,926 

100 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.44,547 44,547 

101 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.27,953 27,953 

102 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE.13,953 13,953 

103 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............ 31,966 31,966 

104 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ............................................. 1,510 1,510 

106 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES ......................................... 3,798 3,798 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 1,114,196 1,164,196 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

107 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL 

CONTROL SEGMENT.

390,889 366,889 

Slow execution ................................................................ [–24,000 ] 

108 0604263F COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT PLATFORM ...... 5,365 5,365 

109 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM 

(AF-IPPS).

91,866 91,866 

110 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 35,467 35,467 

112 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS .............................................................. 133,261 93,996 

1760 IWBU contract delays ........................................... [–10,000 ] 

EHF contract delays ....................................................... [–13,000 ] 

IFF Mode S/5 Development contract delays ................ [–5,000 ] 

SR2 excess to requirement .............................................. [–11,265 ] 

113 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ................... 803 803 

114 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS .............................................................. 33,011 33,011 

115 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................ 340,819 280,319 

Delay in EHF communications development due to 

FAB-T delay.

[–60,500 ] 

116 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM ..... 23,072 23,072 

117 0101314F NIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM ........................................... 5,421 2,000 

Program Termination ..................................................... [–3,421 ] 

119 0102325F ATMOSPHERIC EARLY WARNING SYSTEM ................. 4,485 0 

Unjustified request ......................................................... [–4,485 ] 

120 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER 

MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.

12,672 6,672 

BCS-F excess to requirement ......................................... [–6,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
467 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

121 0102823F STRATEGIC AEROSPACE INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM 

ACTIVITIES.

14 14 

122 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS 

(WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION FUND.

19,934 19,934 

123 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 146,824 126,824 

Contract Delays .............................................................. [–20,000 ] 

125 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 11,051 11,051 

126 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 143,869 131,069 

SLEP Contract Delay ..................................................... [–12,800 ] 

127 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS ............................................................ 207,531 194,831 

ADCP--Excess to Requirement ....................................... [–12,700 ] 

128 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ...................... 13,253 13,253 

129 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS ............................................................ 718,432 571,432 

Program Growth ............................................................. [–147,000 ] 

130 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 47,841 9,967 

Block IV Development--Ahead of need .......................... [–37,874 ] 

131 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 8,023 8,023 

132 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

77,830 77,830 

133 0207170F JOINT HELMET MOUNTED CUEING SYSTEM 

(JHMCS).

1,436 1,436 

134 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ............................... 2,292 2,292 

135 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE ................................. 927 927 

136 0207247F AF TENCAP ........................................................................... 20,727 20,727 

137 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ........ 3,128 3,128 

138 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................... 18,509 18,509 

139 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

182,967 172,967 

Excess to Requirement .................................................... [–10,000 ] 

141 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 

(JASSM).

5,796 5,796 

142 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ................. 121,880 121,880 

143 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ................ 3,954 3,954 

144 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 

(AWACS).

135,961 118,661 

Poor program execution .................................................. [–17,300 ] 

145 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ................. 8,309 8,309 

146 0207423F ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .................. 90,083 44,883 

Common Processing Environment--Schedule Delays ... [–40,000 ] 

JTRS Integration and Engineering Support--Schedule 

Delays.

[–5,200 ] 

148 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES .. 5,428 5,428 

149 0207438F THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I ............. 15,528 15,528 

150 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD .......................... 15,978 9,678 

JETS Contract Delays .................................................... [–2,000 ] 

VCS--Program Termination and Restructure ............... [–4,300 ] 

152 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ........................................... 1,536 1,536 

153 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION .... 18,102 18,102 

154 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR 

SYSTEM (JSTARS).

121,610 121,610 

155 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ........................................................................ 18,599 18,599 

156 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION ............................ 23,091 23,091 

157 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ................. 5,779 5,779 

158 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ................. 5,264 3,264 

Unjustified growth .......................................................... [–2,000 ] 

159 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ....................................... 69,918 63,418 

CAF Increment IV--Critical Change Delay ................... [–6,500 ] 

160 0208021F INFORMATION WARFARE SUPPORT ............................. 2,322 2,322 

161 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES ....................................... 702 702 

168 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE .......................... 11,866 8,866 

Program underexecution due to schedule delays .......... [–3,000 ] 

169 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER 

(NAOC).

5,845 4,845 

Secure, Survivable Communications delayed program 

start.

[–1,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
468 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

170 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).43,811 43,811 

171 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 101,788 92,788 

Delay due to protest ........................................................ [–9,000 ] 

172 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 449 449 

173 0303150F GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............. 3,854 3,854 

175 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................. 238,729 196,729 

Transfer to FAB-T alternative line 175a ...................... [–42,000 ] 

175A 0303XXXF FAB-T ALTERNATIVE ......................................................... 42,000 

Transfer from FAB-T line 175 ....................................... [42,000 ] 

177 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE ................................... –13,500 

Contract/Program Delays .............................................. [–13,500 ] 

177A 0304XXXF RC–135 ................................................................................... 34,744 34,744 

177B 0304XXXF COMMON DEVELOPMENT ................................................ 87,004 87,004 

180 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ........... 4,604 4,604 

181 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 2,026 2,026 

182 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ........................................... 282 282 

183 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) .................. 18,337 18,337 

184 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................... 31,084 31,084 

185 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING 

SYSTEM (ATCALS).

63,367 21,367 

D--RAPCON Contract Delay .......................................... [–42,000 ] 

186 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................... 50,620 45,620 

QF–16–-Excess to Need ................................................... [–5,000 ] 

189 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ............. 366 366 

190 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.39 39 

191 0305159F ENTERPRISE QUERY & CORRELATION ....................... 0 

192 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER 

EQUIPMENT) (SPACE).

133,601 133,601 

193 0305165F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE 

AND CONTROL SEGMENTS).

17,893 17,893 

195 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER.196,254 188,754 

Excess to need ................................................................. [–7,500 ] 

196 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2,961 2,961 

197 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ........................... 9,940 9,940 

198 0305193F INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO).1,271 1,271 

200 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ........... 52,425 45,925 

Funded via reprogramming action ............................... [–6,500 ] 

201 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .................... 106,877 99,677 

Unjustified request ......................................................... [–7,200 ] 

202 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ....................... 13,049 13,049 

203 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.90,724 85,724 

Contract delays ............................................................... [–5,000 ] 

204 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 14,112 11,642 

Common Sensor Payload--Ahead of Need ..................... [–2,470 ] 

205 0305220F RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 423,462 423,462 

206 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 7,348 7,348 

207 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ................................................. 463,081 458,081 

GPS III CIP—poor justification .................................... [–5,000 ] 

208 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM ................................................. 118,950 81,450 

JMS program restructure .............................................. [–37,500 ] 

209 0305887F INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION WARFARE.14,736 14,736 

210 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) .......................... 81,989 81,989 

212 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS .......... 31,956 31,956 

213 0307141F INFORMATION OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & TOOL DEVELOPMENT.23,931 23,931 

214 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ................................... 1,663 1,663 

215 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................. 24,509 6,509 

Contract Delays .............................................................. [–18,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
469 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

216 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) ........................................ 24,941 12,941 

RERP Program Rephased .............................................. [–12,000 ] 

217 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ............................................................ 128,169 94,269 

Contract Delays .............................................................. [–33,900 ] 

218 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................... 39,537 39,537 

219 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES 

(LAIRCM).

7,438 7,438 

220 0401139F LIGHT MOBILITY AIRCRAFT (LIMA) .............................. 1,308 0 

Funded in Fiscal Year 2011 .......................................... [–1,308 ] 

221 0401218F KC–135S ................................................................................. 6,161 6,161 

222 0401219F KC–10S ................................................................................... 30,868 30,868 

223 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ................................. 82,591 42,591 

VC–25A--Funding Ahead of Need ................................. [–40,000 ] 

225 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ..................... 7,118 5,218 

Line of Sight--Contract Delay ........................................ [–1,900 ] 

226 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 1,531 1,531 

228 0708012F LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ................................. 944 944 

229 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) ... 140,284 140,284 

230 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................ 10,990 10,990 

232 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................... 322 322 

233 0804757F JOINT NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER .......................... 11 11 

235 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ................................... 113 113 

236 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY .................... 2,483 2,483 

237 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM .......................... 1,508 1,508 

238 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ..................................... 8,041 1,041 

Contract Delays .............................................................. [–7,000 ] 

239 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .......... 928 928 

240 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE ............. 12,118 12,118 

241 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.101,317 76,317 

DEAMS--Excess to Requirement .................................... [–25,000 ] 

242 0902998F MANAGEMENT HQ—ADP SUPPORT (AF) ...................... 299 299 

242A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 12,063,140 11,829,329 

Classified Adjustment .................................................... [–233,811 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.18,573,266 17,600,332 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, AF.

27,737,701 26,114,569 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE ............................ 47,737 47,737 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 290,773 290,773 

003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES ..................................... 14,731 7,731 

Reduction to new starts .................................................. [–7,000 ] 

005 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH 

SCIENCE.

37,870 37,870 

006 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ............ 101,591 86,591 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–15,000 ] 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 52,617 52,617 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 545,319 523,319 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................ 21,592 20,592 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–1,000 ] 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 110,000 95,000 

Unsustained funding ...................................................... [–15,000 ] 

010 0602228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (HBCU) SCIENCE.15,245 

Realignment of Funds for Proper Oversight and Execution.[15,245 ] 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ......... 37,916 37,916 

012 0602250D8Z SYSTEMS 2020 APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 4,381 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
470 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Duplication of effort ....................................................... [–4,381 ] 

013 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 400,499 354,125 

Program Reduction ......................................................... [–46,374 ] 

014 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .............................. 49,365 49,365 

015 0602305E MACHINE INTELLIGENCE ............................................... 61,351 52,276 

Unsustained growth ....................................................... [–9,075 ] 

016 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ................................. 30,421 30,421 

017 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 219,873 219,873 

018 0602663D8Z DATA TO DECISIONS APPLIED RESEARCH ................. 9,235 4,235 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

019 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ........................................ 9,735 4,735 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

020 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH.14,923 8,923 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–6,000 ] 

021 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 206,422 202,422 

Reduction to new starts .................................................. [–4,000 ] 

022 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ........... 237,837 222,837 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–15,000 ] 

023 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 215,178 215,178 

024 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES.196,954 196,954 

025 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.26,591 26,591 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 1,852,273 1,756,688 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (ATD) 

027 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......... 24,771 15,771 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–9,000 ] 

028 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............................. 45,028 45,028 

029 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 77,019 77,019 

030 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT.283,073 283,073 

031 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ........... 75,003 75,003 

032 0603200D8Z JOINT ADVANCED CONCEPTS ........................................ 7,903 6,803 

Unsustained growth ....................................................... [–1,100 ] 

033 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.20,372 20,372 

034 0603250D8Z SYSTEMS 2020 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.4,381 0 

Lack of transition plan ................................................... [–4,381 ] 

035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 

(AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY.

998 998 

036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ................... 61,458 61,458 

037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ............................... 98,878 98,878 

038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ....................... 97,541 97,541 

039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.229,235 229,235 

040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........ 7,287 7,287 

041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.187,707 176,707 

Unjustified Growth ......................................................... [–11,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ..... 23,890 23,890 

043 0603663D8Z DATA TO DECISIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.9,235 4,235 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

044 0603665D8Z BIOMETRICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ................ 10,762 10,762 

045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH .................. 10,709 5,709 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.18,179 13,179 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–5,000 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND 

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.

17,888 47,888 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
471 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Program Increase- Industrial Base Innovation Fund 

program.

[30,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.26,972 26,972 

049 0603711D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM/AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS.9,756 9,756 

050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.23,887 23,887 

051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE 

TECHNOLOGY.

41,976 29,976 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–12,000 ] 

052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM.66,409 66,409 

053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT.91,132 61,132 

90nm Next Generation Foundry .................................... [–30,000 ] 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ................................... 10,547 10,547 

055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES .............. 160,286 150,286 

Reduction to new starts .................................................. [–10,000 ] 

058 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS.

296,537 261,606 

CCC-01 unsustained growth .......................................... [–7,490 ] 

CCC-02 unsustained growth .......................................... [–3,850 ] 

CCC-CLS unsustained growth ...................................... [–10,591 ] 

Reduction to new starts .................................................. [–13,000 ] 

059 0603765E CLASSIFIED DARPA PROGRAMS .................................... 107,226 107,226 

060 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .......... 235,245 208,503 

NET-01 unsustained growth .......................................... [–11,742 ] 

Reduction to new starts .................................................. [–15,000 ] 

061 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 271,802 271,802 

061A 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM .................. 200,000 

Program Increase ............................................................ [200,000 ] 

063 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.13,579 13,579 

064 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ........................ 30,424 30,424 

065 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS ........................ 89,925 60,765 

P826/P828 excessive growth .......................................... [–25,000 ] 

P832 ................................................................................. [–4,160 ] 

066 0603828D8Z JOINT EXPERIMENTATION ............................................. 58,130 39,130 

Program adjustment ....................................................... [–19,000 ] 

067 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE.

37,029 31,029 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–6,000 ] 

068 0603901C DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH ..................................... 96,329 50,000 

Program Decrease—ALTB ............................................. [–46,329 ] 

069 0603902C NEXT GENERATION AEGIS MISSILE ............................ 123,456 123,456 

070 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ..... 99,593 99,593 

072 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT.20,444 20,444 

073 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ................................................................. 7,788 4,288 

Program reduction .......................................................... [–3,500 ] 

074 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

DEVELOPMENT.

35,242 30,242 

Excess to need ................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

075 1160422BB AVIATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ............................ 837 837 

076 1160472BB SOF INFORMATION AND BROADCAST SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.4,924 4,924 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (ATD).3,270,792 3,237,649 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

077 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P.36,798 30,798 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
472 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Unexecutable growth ...................................................... [–6,000 ] 

078 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 21,040 21,040 

079 0603600D8Z WALKOFF .............................................................................. 112,142 112,142 

080 0603709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM ........................................... 11,129 11,129 

081 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ........ 18,408 18,408 

082 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.63,606 63,606 

082A 0603XXXD8Z INSTALLATION ENERGY TEST BED .............................. 0 

083 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT.290,452 290,452 

084 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT.1,161,001 1,161,001 

086 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 261,143 213,155 

IBP schedule delay ......................................................... [–12,000 ] 

INATS schedule delays .................................................. [–13,000 ] 

JPID program restructure ............................................. [–13,988 ] 

VAC FILO execution delays ........................................... [–9,000 ] 

087 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS .................... 222,374 222,374 

088 0603888C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST & TARGETS ..... 1,071,039 85,690 

Transfer to lines 88a, 88b, and 89 ................................ [–985,349 ] 

088A 0603XXXC BMD TESTS .......................................................................... 488,382 

Transfer from line 88 ..................................................... [488,382 ] 

088B 0603XXXC BMD TARGETS .................................................................... 454,999 

Transfer from line 88 ..................................................... [454,999 ] 

089 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ........................................... 373,563 415,531 

Transfer from line 88 ..................................................... [41,968 ] 

090 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................. 296,554 296,554 

091 0603892C AEGIS BMD ........................................................................... 960,267 990,267 

SM–3 Block IB production improvements .................... [30,000 ] 

092 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .......... 96,353 96,353 

093 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS.7,951 7,951 

094 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND 

CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND 

COMMUNICATI.

364,103 364,103 

096 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER 

SUPPORT.

41,225 41,225 

097 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS 

CENTER (MDIOC).

69,325 69,325 

098 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................ 15,797 15,797 

099 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ................................. 177,058 157,058 

Program Decrease—Excess funds .................................. [–20,000 ] 

101 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS ............................. 106,100 216,100 

Arrow System Improvement Program ........................... [20,000 ] 

Arrow–3 interceptor development .................................. [5,000 ] 

David’s Sling development ............................................. [25,000 ] 

Program Increase ............................................................ [60,000 ] 

102 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ............................................ 14,996 14,996 

103 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ....................................................... 12,743 12,743 

104 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,221 35,321 

Program increase—funding shortfall ............................ [32,100 ] 

105 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT.25,120 25,120 

107 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING.10,309 7,509 

Program Decrease ........................................................... [–2,800 ] 

108 0604787D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION COMMAND (JSIC) ... 13,024 13,024 

109 0604828D8Z JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM.9,290 9,290 

110 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ............................................ 306,595 306,595 

111 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ............... 424,454 424,454 

112 0604883C PRECISION TRACKING SPACE SENSOR RDT&E ........ 160,818 80,818 

Program Reduction ......................................................... [–80,000 ] 

113 0604884C AIRBORNE INFRARED (ABIR) .......................................... 46,877 46,877 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
473 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) 

PROGRAM.

3,358 3,358 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.6,808,233 6,823,545 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 

(SDD) 

117 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD.7,220 7,220 

118 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT.204,824 179,824 

Program Reduction ......................................................... [–25,000 ] 

119 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 400,608 316,608 

Bioscavenger program delays ........................................ [–24,000 ] 

Decontamination FOS delays ........................................ [–10,000 ] 

MCMI RFP release delay ............................................... [–50,000 ] 

120 0604709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM ........................................... 2,782 2,782 

121 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE 

(AITS-JPO).

49,198 38,824 

Cyber threat discovery .................................................... [15,000 ] 

Program growth .............................................................. [–25,374 ] 

122 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 

SYSTEM (JTIDS).

17,395 17,395 

123 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES.5,888 5,888 

124 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 12,228 12,228 

127 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ...... 389 389 

128 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM ......................... 1,929 1,929 

129 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES .................... 4,993 4,993 

130 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

134,285 94,285 

Program Growth ............................................................. [–40,000 ] 

131 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION ................................ 41,808 41,808 

133 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES.14,950 14,950 

135 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 19,837 19,837 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION (SDD).918,334 758,960 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

137 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 6,658 6,658 

138 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT ... 4,731 4,731 

139 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVAULATION INVESTMENT 

DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP).

140,231 140,231 

140 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS .............................. 2,757 2,757 

141 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ................................................................ 7,827 7,827 

142 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY 

(JMETC).

10,479 10,479 

143 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ..... 34,213 34,213 

144 0605110D8Z USD(A&T)--CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT .......... 1,486 1,486 

145 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION.64,524 64,524 

146 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO).

79,859 79,859 

148 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ............................... 19,080 19,080 

149 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................. 41,884 41,884 

150 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ................. 4,261 4,261 

151 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION.9,437 9,437 

152 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) .......... 6,549 6,549 

153 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 92,806 92,806 

160 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ 

SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S.

1,924 1,924 

161 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .............................. 16,135 16,135 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
474 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

163 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 

(DTIC).

56,269 56,269 

164 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING 

AND EVALUATION.

49,810 49,810 

165 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION .................... 15,805 19,305 

Program Increase ............................................................ [3,500 ] 

166 0605897E DARPA AGENCY RELOCATION ........................................ 1,000 1,000 

167 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 66,689 66,689 

168 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS .................... 4,528 4,528 

169 0606301D8Z AVIATION SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES ............................. 6,925 6,925 

170 0203345D8Z OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) .................................. 1,777 1,777 

171 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT .......................... 18 18 

174 0303166D8Z SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES.12,209 12,209 

175 0303169D8Z INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RAPID ACQUISITION 4,288 4,288 

176 0305103E CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 10,000 5,000 

Execution delays ............................................................. [–5,000 ] 

177 0305193D8Z INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO).15,002 15,002 

179 0305400D8Z WARFIGHTING AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED SUPPORT.861 861 

180 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING 

TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2).

59,958 38,090 

P754, Duplication with Service initiatives ................... [–21,868 ] 

182 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................. 28,908 28,908 

183 0901598D8W IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES .................................... 167 167 

184A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 82,627 82,627 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 961,682 938,314 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

185 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ....................... 8,706 6,206 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–2,500 ] 

186 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND 

PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA.

2,165 2,165 

187 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED 

INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS).

288 288 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT).15,956 15,956 

189 0607828D8Z JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ....... 29,880 29,880 

190 0208043J CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 2,402 2,402 

191 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 72,403 72,403 

193 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING.7,093 7,093 

200 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE 

SUPPORT.

481 481 

201 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 

AND INTEGRATION.

8,366 15,866 

Cybersecurity pilots ........................................................ [7,500 ] 

202 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ........................ 11,324 11,324 

203 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).12,514 12,514 

204 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) .......................... 6,548 6,548 

205 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) ........... 33,751 33,751 

206 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 11,753 11,753 

207 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 348,593 348,593 

208 0303140K INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 5,500 5,500 

211 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............. 54,739 54,739 

212 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ........................ 29,154 29,154 

213 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ......... 1,830 1,830 

214 0303260D8Z JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE .................. 1,241 1,241 

215 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ....................................................... 6,418 6,418 

217 0304210BB SPECIAL APPILCATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ....... 5,045 5,045 

220 0305103D8Z CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 411 411 

222 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 4,341 4,341 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
475 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

223 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ..... 13,008 13,008 

227 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................. 6,603 6,603 

229 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ............................................................... 14,926 14,926 

232 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.4,303 1,303 

Unjustified increase ........................................................ [–3,000 ] 

235 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.3,154 3,154 

237 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 2,499 2,499 

239 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 

PROGRAM.

2,660 2,660 

240 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY 

AND ARCHITECTURES.

1,444 1,444 

248 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ........................................ 23,103 23,103 

249 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ................................. 2,466 2,466 

250 0902298J MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS) ........................ 2,730 2,730 

252 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 2,499 2,499 

253 1105232BB RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 3,000 1,500 

Lack of full funding ........................................................ [–1,500 ] 

254 1105233BB RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 450 450 

256 1160403BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.89,382 74,382 

MC–130 TF/TA radar contract award delay ............... [–15,000 ] 

257 1160404BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TACTICAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.799 799 

258 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT.

27,916 27,916 

259 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .......................... 60,915 60,915 

260 1160421BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS CV–22 DEVELOPMENT ........... 10,775 10,775 

263 1160427BB MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION SYSTEMS 

(MTPS).

4,617 4,617 

265 1160429BB AC/MC–130J ......................................................................... 18,571 18,571 

266 1160474BB SOF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS.1,392 1,392 

268 1160477BB SOF WEAPONS SYSTEMS ................................................. 2,610 2,610 

269 1160478BB SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS.2,971 2,971 

270 1160479BB SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS.3,000 3,000 

271 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES ................................................ 3,522 3,522 

272 1160481BB SOF MUNITIONS ................................................................. 1,500 1,500 

273 1160482BB SOF ROTARY WING AVIATION ........................................ 51,123 51,123 

274 1160483BB SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ......................................... 92,424 68,424 

Excessive growth ............................................................. [–24,000 ] 

275 1160484BB SOF SURFACE CRAFT ........................................................ 14,475 14,475 

276 1160488BB SOF MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS.2,990 2,990 

277 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .... 8,923 8,923 

278 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE.9,473 9,473 

278A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 4,227,920 4,265,700 

Classified Adjustment .................................................... [35,780 ] 

File sanitization tool (FiST) authorization adjustment [2,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.5,399,045 5,398,325 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

279A 0901XXXD UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................ 0 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .................................... 0 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, DW.

19,755,678 19,436,800 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
476 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ...................... 60,444 60,444 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .............................. 12,126 12,126 

003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ... 118,722 118,722 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 191,292 191,292 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE.191,292 191,292 

TOTAL RDT&E ......................................................... 75,325,082 71,570,717 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

140 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES .......................... 8,513 8,513 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ... 8,513 8,513 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, ARMY.

8,513 8,513 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.1,500 1,500 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.1,500 1,500 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

097 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ...................... 5,600 5,600 

119 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.3,500 3,500 

126 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 1,950 1,950 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.11,050 11,050 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

172 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ............................................................ 2,000 2,000 

189 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ........... 1,500 1,500 

192 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP).4,050 4,050 

215 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................... 0 

227A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 33,784 33,784 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.41,334 41,334 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, NAVY.

53,884 53,884 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

200 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ............. 73,000 63,000 

Excess to need ................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

242A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 69,000 69,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.142,000 142,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, AF.

142,000 132,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
477 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2012 Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

152 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ............ 9,200 9,200 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ... 9,200 9,200 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

202 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS .......................... 10,500 10,500 

207 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM .......... 32,850 32,850 

211 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............... 2,000 2,000 

254 1105233BB RQ–7 UAV ................................................................................ 2,450 2,450 

278A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 135,361 125,361 

Classified Adjustment ...................................................... [–10,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.183,161 183,161 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, DW.

192,361 182,361 

TOTAL RDT&E .......................................................... 396,758 376,758 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 1,399,804 1,031,695 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ................................................................. [–217,376 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment [–2,539 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction [–148,194 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 104,629 90,595 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ................................................................. [–11,752 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction [–2,282 ] 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 815,920 741,068 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ................................................................. [–74,852 ] 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 825,587 764,818 

Transfer to Title XV: Chemical Defense Equipment Sustainment ................................................. [–8,579 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ................................................................. [–23,198 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction [–18,692 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: UAS—Gray Eagle Satellite 

Service ................................................................... [–10,300 ] 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 1,245,231 1,072,413 

Transfer to Title XV: Combat Training Center 

Role Players ........................................................... [–30,091 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
478 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Transfer to Title XV: Fox Nuclear Biological and 

Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle Contract Logistics Support ...................................................... [–12,062 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Joint Maneuver Readiness 

Center Opposing Force Augmentation ................. [–4,545 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Joint Readiness Training 

Center Opposing Force Augmentation ................. [–26,940 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment 

at Combat Training Centers ................................ [–6,420 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: National Training Center 

Tier Two Level Maintenance Contract ................ [–24,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: National Training Center 

Warfighter Focus .................................................. [–26,650 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction [–14,984 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Tube-Launched, OpticallyTracked, Wire-Guided Missile (TOW) Improved 

Target Acquisition System (ITAS) Contract Logistics Support ...................................................... [–6,841 ] 

Transfer to TitleXV: Sustainment Brigade and 

Functional Brigade Warfighter Exercise ............. [–20,285 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 1,199,340 1,131,228 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ................................................................. [–6,607 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction [–61,505 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 2,939,455 2,778,799 

FOB Baseline Not Taken into Account in Requested Program Growth ..................................... [–20,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Battle Simulation Centers ... [–59,702 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Body Armor Sustainment .... [–71,660 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Rapid Equipping Force 

Readiness ............................................................... [–9,294 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 451,228 404,896 

Deny Requested Growth for Civilian and Contractor Positions .................................................... [–20,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Capability Development and 

Integration ............................................................. [–5,161 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Fixed Wing Life Cycle Contract Support ......................................................... [–21,171 ] 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 1,179,675 1,031,839 

Budget Justification does not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for Utilities ............ [–37,500 ] 

Removal of fiscal year 2011 Costs Budgeted for 

Detainee Operations (Full fiscal year 2012 Requirement Funded in Title XV) ........................... [–70,000 ] 

Transfer to title XV: Senior Leader Initiative: 

Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program ............ [–30,000 ] 

Transfer to title XV: Training Range Maintenance [–10,336 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 7,637,052 7,329,552 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for Utilities ............ [–37,500 ] 

Removal of FY11 Costs Budgeted for Detainee Operations (Full FY12 Requirement Funded in 

OCO) ...................................................................... [–70,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Overseas Security Guards .... [–200,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 2,495,667 2,495,667 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ ................. 397,952 397,952 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
479 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 171,179 171,179 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .......................................................................... 459,585 439,115 

Military Information Support Operations .............. [–20,470 ] 

175 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –1,504,500 

Contractor Logistics Support ................................... [–50,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Readiness and Depot Maintenance ................................................................... [–1,454,500 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 21,322,304 18,376,316 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ................................................ 390,394 390,394 

190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ............................ 169,535 169,535 

200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .................................. 6,675 6,675 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 566,604 566,604 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 113,262 113,262 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 71,012 71,012 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ................................ 49,275 49,275 

240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 417,071 417,071 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 1,045,948 1,030,765 

Transfer to Title XV: Survivability and Maneuverability Training .................................................... [–15,183 ] 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 1,083,808 1,083,808 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 191,073 191,073 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 607,896 607,896 

290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 523,501 523,501 

300 EXAMINING ................................................................... 139,159 139,159 

310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 238,978 238,978 

320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 221,156 221,156 

330 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 170,889 170,889 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 4,873,028 4,857,845 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

340 SECURITY PROGRAMS ................................................ 995,161 993,801 

Classified Adjustment .............................................. [–1,360 ] 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 524,334 524,334 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ................................ 705,668 705,668 

370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................. 484,075 487,075 

Army Requested Transfer for Army Enterprise 

Systems Integration Program from Other Procurement, Army line 116 ...................................... [3,000 ] 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .................................. 457,741 387,741 

Requested Growth Unjustified by Metrics Provided in Performance Criteria ............................. [–70,000 ] 

390 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 775,313 775,313 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 1,534,706 1,510,957 

Army Requested Transfer for General Fund Enterprise Business System (GFEBS) from Other 

Procurement, Army Line 116 ............................... [3,368 ] 

Army Requested Transfer for Global Combat Support System—Army (GCSS–Army) from Other 

Procurement, Army Line 116 ............................... [2,883 ] 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for DISA ................ [–30,000 ] 

410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 316,924 316,924 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
480 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................ 214,356 214,356 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ....................................... 1,093,877 1,033,877 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for DFAS ............... [–50,000 ] 

Unjustified program growth-Joint DOD Support .. [–5,000 ] 

Unjustified program growth-PA Strategic Communications ................................................................ [–5,000 ] 

440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ........................................ 216,621 216,621 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .................................. 180,717 170,717 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for the Pentagon 

Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund .......... [–10,000 ] 

455 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS ............................................................................ 0 

460 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ........................... 449,901 449,901 

470 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS .................... 23,886 20,886 

Transfer from SAG 411—Military Information 

Support Operations .............................................. [–3,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 7,973,280 7,808,171 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

480 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –1,079,704 

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 ADJUSTMENT FOR DEFENSE EFFICIENCY CIVILIAN STAFFING 

REDUCTION ........................................................ [–12,904 ] 

Decrease in OPTEMPO as cited by Army ............... [–291,500 ] 

IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF TELECOM 

SERVICES ............................................................ [–10,000 ] 

Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ..... [–10,600 ] 

Section 8089—Excess Cash Balances in DWCF ..... [–515,000 ] 

Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ..................................................................... [–1,400 ] 

Unobligated balances ............................................... [–238,300 ] 

999 CLASSIFIED ................................................................... 0 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –1,079,704 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY ................................................................ 34,735,216 30,529,232 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....... 4,762,887 4,499,387 

Transfer to Title XV: Flying Hours ......................... [–180,945 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: MV 22B Pricing Variance .... [–82,555 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ................................................. 1,771,644 1,771,644 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES ................................................................... 46,321 46,321 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ............ 104,751 87,751 

Unjustified Growth for Program Related Logistics 

Support .................................................................. [–17,000 ] 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................. 431,576 431,576 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 1,030,303 1,030,303 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........... 37,403 37,403 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ................................................. 238,007 238,007 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............ 3,820,186 3,795,186 

Reduced Number of Deployed Steaming Days ....... [–25,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
481 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 734,866 734,866 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 4,972,609 5,122,609 

Ship Depot Maintenance (Active) ............................ [150,000 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..................... 1,304,271 1,297,271 

Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for 

Surface Ship Life Cycle Maintenance (SSLCM) 

Activity and Local Command Office for Navy 

Enterprise Resource Planning ............................. [–7,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 583,659 556,259 

Eliminate Requested Growth of Contractor Fulltime Equivalents ................................................... [–27,400 ] 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ............................................. 97,011 97,011 

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE ................. 162,303 137,303 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes ................................ [–25,000 ] 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ...................................................... 423,187 423,187 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ......................................................................... 320,141 320,141 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 1,076,478 883,677 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command Increases ....................................... [–192,801 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .................................... 187,037 187,037 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................... 4,352 4,352 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 103,830 103,830 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT .................................................................... 180,800 166,400 

Military Information Support Operations .............. [–6,100 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Joint Special Operations 

Task Force—Philippines ...................................... [–8,300 ] 

230 CRUISE MISSILE .......................................................... 125,333 125,333 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ....................................... 1,209,410 1,209,410 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ......... 99,063 90,063 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command ....................................................... [–9,000 ] 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 450,454 450,454 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................... 358,002 358,002 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION .................................... 971,189 971,189 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 1,946,779 1,946,779 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 4,610,525 4,540,525 

Savings from In-sourcing Security Contractor Positions Not Properly Accounted for in Budget 

Documentation ...................................................... [–20,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Regional/Emergency Operations Center ......................................................... [–50,000 ] 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –645,000 

CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT ............... [–150,000 ] 

TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... [–495,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 32,164,377 31,018,276 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ...................... 493,326 493,326 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ........... 6,228 6,228 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ..................... 205,898 205,898 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 68,634 63,630 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
482 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Transfer to Title XV: Medical/Equipment costs for 

USNS MERCY ...................................................... [–5,004 ] 

350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS .......................................... 2,684 2,684 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ........................................... 25,192 25,192 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 801,962 796,958 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 147,540 147,540 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 10,655 10,655 

390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ................. 151,147 148,361 

Excessive Program Increase for General Services 

Administration Lease Cost ................................... [–2,786 ] 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 594,799 544,278 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Sea Systems Command Visit, Board, Search and Seizure 

(VBSS)/Explosive Ordnance Device (EOD) 

Training ................................................................ [–3,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth in Moored and Tech Training [–47,521 ] 

410 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 9,034 9,034 

420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 173,452 173,452 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 168,025 168,025 

440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 254,860 255,843 

Naval Sea Cadet Corps ........................................ [983 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 140,279 140,279 

460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 107,561 107,561 

470 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 52,689 52,689 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 1,810,041 1,757,717 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 754,483 754,483 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................. 14,275 14,275 

500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 112,616 112,616 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 216,483 203,926 

Transfer to Title XV: Family Readiness Programs [–3,557 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Navy Manpower and Personnel System/NSIPS .......................................... [–9,000 ] 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................ 282,295 282,295 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 534,873 534,873 

545 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS ............................................................................ 0 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 190,662 190,662 

570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .............. 303,636 293,636 

Unjustified Growth for Installation Emergency 

Management .......................................................... [–10,000 ] 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 903,885 903,885 

590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT ............................................................................ 54,880 54,880 

600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ................................. 20,687 20,687 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS .. 68,374 68,374 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ............................ 572,928 572,928 

680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ............................................................................. 5,516 5,516 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 552,715 550,334 

Classified adjustment .............................................. [–2,381 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 4,588,308 4,563,370 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
483 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –67,000 

Deny FY12 Budget Price Growth for Civilian Personnel Compensation ............................................ [–5,000 ] 

IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF TELECOM 

SERVICES ............................................................ [–10,000 ] 

Unobligated balances ............................................... [–52,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –67,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY ................................................................. 39,364,688 38,069,321 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............................................. 715,196 695,196 

Request Inconsistent with Information Technology 

Budget Justification for the Global Combat 

Support System ..................................................... [–20,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ........................................................ 677,608 677,608 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 190,713 78,713 

Transfer to Title XV: Depot Maintenance ............... [–112,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING ................................... 101,464 101,464 

060 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 823,390 823,390 

070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 2,208,949 1,953,949 

Reduction for Collateral Equipment Requirements 

Not Properly Accounted for in Budget Documentation .............................................................. [–20,000 ] 

TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... [–235,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 4,717,320 4,330,320 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

080 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 18,280 18,280 

090 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 820 820 

100 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 85,816 85,816 

120 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 33,142 33,142 

130 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 324,643 324,643 

140 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 184,432 184,432 

150 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 43,708 43,708 

160 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 19,671 19,671 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 710,512 710,512 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 36,021 36,021 

190 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 405,431 405,431 

200 ACQUISITION & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .......... 91,153 91,153 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 532,605 532,605 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

210 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –38,000 

OMMC Request Inconsistent with Information 

Technology Budget Justification for the Operational Support Systems—Command and Control ......................................................................... [–20,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
484 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Unobligated balances ............................................... [–18,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –38,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MARINE CORPS ............................................ 5,960,437 5,535,437 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 4,224,400 3,564,242 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–590,158 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Theater Security Package .... [–70,000 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ......................... 3,417,731 2,706,439 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–673,292 ] 

Removal of One-Time FY11 Costs for Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions ....................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

Removal of One-Time FY11 Costs for Software 

Maintenance Requirements .................................. [–24,000 ] 

Unjustified Increase in Travel ................................. [–10,000 ] 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ....................................................................... 1,482,814 1,380,264 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–102,550 ] 

050 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 2,204,131 3,788,606 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [1,584,475 ] 

060 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 1,652,318 1,652,318 

070 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 2,507,179 2,482,179 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for Utilities ............ [–25,000 ] 

080 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ........................ 1,492,459 1,282,024 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–198,435 ] 

Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for 

Long Range Radar Service Life Extension Program ...................................................................... [–12,000 ] 

090 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ................... 1,046,226 1,019,538 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–12,688 ] 

Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for 

Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions ..................................................... [–14,000 ] 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 696,188 691,188 

Classified Adjustment .............................................. [–5,000 ] 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ................................................... 321,484 313,484 

Overstated Requirement for Additional Fiscal 

Year 2012 Funding for Satellite and Launcher 

Control Ranges ...................................................... [–8,000 ] 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ...................................... 633,738 619,552 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–7,186 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
485 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for 

Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions ..................................................... [–7,000 ] 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT .................................................................... 735,488 664,262 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–166 ] 

Military Information Support Operations .............. [–33,700 ] 

Strategic Command Program Decreases Not Accounted for in Budget Documentation ................. [–20,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: CENTCOM HQ C4 ............... [–12,500 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: CENTCOM Public Affairs ... [–4,860 ] 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 170,481 170,481 

145 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –670,000 

CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT ............... [–200,000 ] 

TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND 

DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... [–470,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 20,584,637 19,664,577 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ................................................ 2,988,221 2,543,389 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–444,832 ] 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ............................. 150,724 150,724 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 373,568 818,400 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [444,832 ] 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 388,103 388,103 

190 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 674,230 674,230 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 4,574,846 4,574,846 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 114,448 114,448 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 22,192 22,192 

220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ... 90,545 90,545 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 430,090 430,090 

240 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 789,654 749,654 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for Utilities ............ [–25,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Competitive Sourcing and 

Privatization ......................................................... [–15,000 ] 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 481,357 471,357 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for Equipment 

Maintenance by Contract ..................................... [–10,000 ] 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 957,538 957,538 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 198,897 198,897 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 108,248 108,248 

290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 6,386 6,386 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 136,102 136,102 

310 EXAMINING ................................................................... 3,079 3,079 

320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 167,660 167,660 

330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 202,767 189,767 

Maintain Service Contracts at the fiscal year 2011 

Level ....................................................................... [–13,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
486 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

340 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 75,259 75,259 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 3,784,222 3,721,222 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ........................................... 1,112,878 1,112,252 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [–626 ] 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................... 785,150 785,150 

370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 14,356 14,982 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the 

Depot Maintenance SAG ...................................... [626 ] 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 416,588 416,588 

390 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 1,219,043 1,219,043 

400 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 662,180 662,180 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 650,689 650,689 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................... 1,078,769 1,060,769 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of 

Price and Program Changes for DFAS ............... [–7,000 ] 

Program decrease ..................................................... [–11,000 ] 

425 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS ............................................................................ 0 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ....................................................... 23,338 23,338 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ....................................... 72,589 72,589 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 1,215,848 1,200,261 

Classified adjustment .............................................. [–15,587 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 7,251,428 7,217,841 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –150,000 

EXCESS WORKING CAPITAL FUND CARRYOVER ..................................................................... [–90,000 ] 

Unobligated balances ............................................... [–60,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –150,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AIR FORCE ...................................................... 36,195,133 35,028,486 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSEWIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ........................................... 563,787 558,287 

Reduce Civilian Personnel Fiscal Year 2012 Average Salary Growth ................................................ [–5,500 ] 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................... 3,986,766 3,893,859 

Transfer to Title XV: Military Information Support Activities .................................................... [–57,300 ] 

Aviation Foreign Internal Defense .......................... [–17,607 ] 

Reduce Civilian Personnel fiscal year 2012 Average Salary Growth ................................................ [–10,000 ] 

Sustaining Base Communications—Excessive 

Gowth .................................................................... [–8,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 4,550,553 4,452,146 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

030 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY .................... 124,075 124,075 

040 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ......................... 93,348 93,348 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
487 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 217,423 217,423 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS ..................................... 159,692 159,692 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ................... 508,822 469,622 

Reduction in Non-Pay Personnel Support Overhead Costs ............................................................. [–39,200 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ... 1,147,366 1,147,366 

100 DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE 12,000 12,000 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY ............ 676,419 645,989 

Overstatement of Fiscal Year 2012 Costs for Civilian Personnel ........................................................ [–30,000 ] 

Unjustified Increase for the Request for Defense 

Advisory Committee on Women in the Services 

Program Reporting ............................................... [–430 ] 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ...... 1,360,392 1,360,392 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .................... 37,367 37,367 

150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ................................. 450,863 452,263 

Efficiencies in the Continutity of Operations Policy [–3,000 ] 

Procurement Technical Assistance Program .......... [6,000 ] 

Unjustified Request for the Defense Property Accountability System Program Office .................... [–1,600 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ....................................... 256,133 256,133 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ..................................... 22,372 22,372 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY - 

GLOBAL TRAIN AND EQUIP ................................... 500,000 350,000 

Reduction to Global Train and Equip .................... [–150,000 ] 

185 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY - 

OTHER ......................................................................... 182,831 180,551 

Authorization Adjustment—Security Cooperation 

Assessment Office .................................................. [–2,280 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ................................. 505,366 505,366 

200 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................... 33,848 33,848 

210 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............. 432,133 432,133 

220 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ................................................................................ 2,768,677 2,695,677 

Transfer to Title XV: Child Care and Counseling [–73,000 ] 

230 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ..................................... 202,758 202,758 

250 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ................... 81,754 48,754 

Ahead of need - Guam FSRM ................................. [–33,000 ] 

260 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE .......... 2,201,964 2,164,564 

Additional Efficiencies Based on Disestablishment 

of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks 

and Information Integration) ............................... [–10,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Boards and Commissions [–7,300 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Equipment Maintenance 

by Contract ............................................................ [–10,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for the Office of the Under 

Secretary of Defense, Policy and for other OSD 

Programs ............................................................... [–10,100 ] 

270 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE ............ 563,184 556,684 

Removal of Fiscal Year 2011 Costs Budgeted for 

the Defense Agencies Initiative ............................ [–6,500 ] 

275 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 14,068,492 13,628,508 

Classified adjustment .............................................. [–439,984 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 26,172,433 25,362,039 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
488 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

280 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –155,245 

DOD Impact Aid (Section 581) ................................ [40,000 ] 

Reduction to Federally Funded Research and Development Centers ................................................. [–150,245 ] 

Severe disabilities ..................................................... [5,000 ] 

Unobligated balances ............................................... [–50,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –155,245 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................. 30,940,409 29,876,363 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 1,091 1,091 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 18,129 18,129 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 492,705 492,705 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 137,304 137,304 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 597,786 597,786 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 67,366 67,366 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 474,966 448,523 

Sustainment Costs For Weapons of Mass Destruction Equipment Purchases Not Needed in Fiscal 

Year 2012 .............................................................. [–6,000 ] 

Unjustified Funding for Milcon Planning and Design ........................................................................ [–20,443 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 69,841 69,841 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 247,010 247,010 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 590,078 583,078 

Reduction for Payments to the General Services 

Administration for Standard Level User 

Charges Not Properly Accounted for in Budget 

Documentation ...................................................... [–7,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 255,618 255,618 

125 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... 0 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 2,951,894 2,918,451 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 14,447 14,447 

140 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 76,393 76,393 

150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 3,844 3,844 

160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 9,033 9,033 

170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 53,565 53,565 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 157,282 157,282 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

175 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –4,000 

Unjustified Increase Budgeted for Fiscal Year 

2012 Price Growth for Civilian Compensation ... [–4,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –4,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY RESERVE ............................................ 3,109,176 3,071,733 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
489 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....... 622,868 622,868 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .............................. 16,041 16,041 

030 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ............ 1,511 1,511 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 123,547 123,547 

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........... 379 379 

060 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............ 49,701 49,701 

070 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 593 593 

080 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 53,916 53,916 

090 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 15,445 15,445 

100 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 153,942 153,942 

110 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 7,292 7,292 

120 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION .................................... 75,131 57,131 

Unjustified Growth for Next Generation Enterprise Network Seat Services ................................. [–18,000 ] 

130 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 72,083 72,083 

140 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 109,024 109,024 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 1,301,473 1,283,473 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 1,857 1,857 

160 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 14,438 14,438 

170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 2,394 2,394 

180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 2,972 2,972 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 21,661 21,661 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY RESERVE ............................................. 1,323,134 1,305,134 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ................................................... 94,604 94,604 

020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 16,382 16,382 

040 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 31,520 31,520 

050 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 105,809 105,809 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 248,315 248,315 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

070 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 852 852 

080 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 13,257 13,257 

090 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 9,019 9,019 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 23,128 23,128 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MARINE CORPS RESERVE ........................ 271,443 271,443 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 2,171,853 2,171,853 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 116,513 116,513 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
490 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 471,707 471,707 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 77,161 77,161 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 308,974 308,974 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 3,146,208 3,146,208 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 84,423 84,423 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 17,076 17,076 

080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 19,688 19,688 

090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ........ 6,170 6,170 

100 AUDIOVISUAL ............................................................... 794 794 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 128,151 128,151 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AIR FORCE RESERVE ................................. 3,274,359 3,274,359 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 634,181 634,181 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 189,899 189,899 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 751,899 751,899 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 112,971 112,971 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 33,972 33,972 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 854,048 838,048 

Unjustified Growth for Duty Military Occupation 

Specialities Qualified (DMOSQ) Training .......... [–16,000 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 706,299 706,299 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 50,453 50,453 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 646,608 646,608 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 1,028,126 988,626 

Unjustified Growth for Public Affairs .................... [–4,500 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Travel ................................. [–25,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Utilities Based on Metrics 

Provided in Budget Documentation .................... [–10,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 618,513 618,513 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ ................. 792,575 787,575 

Army National Guard-Identified Excess ................ [–5,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 6,419,544 6,359,044 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 11,703 11,703 

150 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 178,655 178,655 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 42,073 42,073 

170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 6,789 6,789 

180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 382,668 382,668 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 621,888 621,888 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

185 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –56,000 

Decrease in OPTEMPO as cited by Army ............... [–25,000 ] 

Deny Increase Budgeted for Fiscal Year 2012 

Price Growth for Civilian Compensation ............ [–11,000 ] 

Reduction in non-dual status technician limitation ......................................................................... [–20,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
491 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –56,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD .......................... 7,041,432 6,924,932 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL 

GUARD 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ............................................ 3,651,900 3,647,900 

Overstated Requirement for Additional fiscal year 

2012 Funding for Air Sovereignty Alert Program ...................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 751,519 751,519 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 753,525 753,525 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 284,348 284,348 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 621,942 588,442 

O&M Air National Guard Request Inconsistent 

with Information Technology Budget Justification for Base Level Communication Infrastructure ......................................................................... [–23,500 ] 

O&M Air National Guard Request Inconsistent 

with MIP Budget Justification for Air Intelligence Systems ..................................................... [–10,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 6,063,234 6,025,734 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 39,387 39,387 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 33,659 33,659 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 73,046 73,046 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD .............................. 6,136,280 6,098,780 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 

FORCES, DEFENSE .................................................. 13,861 13,861 

020 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND 

CIVIC AID .................................................................... 107,662 107,662 

030 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ..................... 508,219 508,219 

040 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD ......................................... 305,501 105,501 

Program Decrease ..................................................... [–200,000 ] 

050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY .............. 346,031 346,031 

060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY .............. 308,668 308,668 

070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE .... 525,453 525,453 

080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ...... 10,716 10,716 

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY 

USED SITES ............................................................... 276,495 276,495 

100 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

TRANSFER FUND ...................................................... 5,000 0 

Program Reduction .................................................. [–5,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ................................................................... 2,407,606 2,202,606 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ............................................................... 2,407,606 2,202,606 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
492 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

010 DEFERRED EXPENSES FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS ........................................................................ 0 

TOTAL DEFERRED EXPENSES FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS ...................................... 0 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ..... 170,759,313 162,187,826 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................. 3,424,314 3,485,083 

Transfer from Title III: Chemical Defense Equipment [8,579 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ......................................................................... [23,198 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction .... [18,692 ] 

Transfer from Title III: UAS—Gray Eagle Satellite 

Service ........................................................................... [10,300 ] 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................ 1,534,886 1,707,704 

Transfer from Title III: Combat Training Center Role 

Players .......................................................................... [30,091 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Fox Nuclear Biological and 

ChemicalReconnaissance Vehicle Contract Logistics 

Support ......................................................................... [12,062 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Joint Maneuver Readiness 

Center Opposing Force Augmentation ........................ [4,545 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Joint Readiness Training Center Opposing Force Augmentation .............................. [26,940 ] 

Transfer from Title III: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment at 

Combat Training Centers ............................................ [6,420 ] 

Transfer from Title III: National Training Center Tier 

Two Level Maintenance Contract ............................... [24,000 ] 

Transfer from Title III: National Training Center War 

Fighter Focus ............................................................... [26,650 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Sustainment Brigade and 

FunctionalBrigade Warfighter Exercise ..................... [20,285 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction .... [14,984 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Tube-Launched, OpticallyTracked, Wire-Guided Missile (TOW) Improved Target Acquisition System (ITAS) Contract Logistics 

Support ......................................................................... [6,841 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................... 87,166 155,278 

Transfer from Title III: Combined Arms Training 

Strategy ......................................................................... [6,607 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction .... [61,505 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............... 2,675,821 2,816,477 

Transfer from Title III: Battle Simulation Centers ...... [59,702 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Body Armor Sustainment ....... [71,660 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Rapid Equipping Force Readiness ............................................................................... [9,294 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
493 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ........................... 579,000 605,332 

Transfer from Title III: Capability Development and 

Integration .................................................................... [5,161 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Fixed Wing Life Cycle Contract Support ................................................................ [21,171 ] 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ......................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................... 951,371 1,191,707 

Transfer from Title III: Overseas Security Guards ....... [200,000 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Senior Leader Initiative: Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program ........................... [30,000 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Training Range Maintenance [10,336 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................... 250,000 250,000 

140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES .................................................. 22,998,441 24,872,494 

Military Information Support Operations ..................... [–40,625 ] 

Synchronization Pre-Deployment and Operational 

Tracker Fully Funded in O&M DW Base Request in 

fiscal year 2012 ............................................................ [–12,000 ] 

Transfer from Base, SAG 111: MRAP Vehicle 

Sustainment ................................................................. [2,539 ] 

Transfer from Base, SAG 111: Theater Demand Reduction .......................................................................... [148,194 ] 

Transfer from Base, SAG 112: Theater Demand Reduction .......................................................................... [2,282 ] 

Transfer from title III—Readiness (transfer from BA–1 

undistributed) ............................................................... [1,454,500 ] 

Transfer from title III SAG 111—Combined Arms 

Training Strategy ........................................................ [217,376 ] 

Transfer from title III SAG 112—Combined Arms 

Training Strategy ........................................................ [11,752 ] 

Transfer from title III SAG 113—Combined Arms 

Training Strategy ........................................................ [74,852 ] 

Transfer from title III SAG 321—Survivability and 

Maneuverability Training ........................................... [15,183 ] 

150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 425,000 400,000 

Unjustified Request for CERP Iraq ................................ [–25,000 ] 

160 RESET .................................................................................... 3,955,429 3,955,429 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 37,881,428 40,439,504 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

340 SECURITY PROGRAMS ....................................................... 2,476,766 2,436,766 

ARGUS A–160 deployment delays ................................. [–40,000 ] 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................. 3,507,186 3,507,186 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ........................................ 50,740 50,740 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .......................................... 84,427 84,427 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ................................ 66,275 40,075 

Transfer to Title II—Automated Biometric Identification System ................................................................... [–26,200 ] 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................ 143,391 143,391 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT .............................................. 92,067 92,067 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ..... 6,420,852 6,354,652 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

480 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................. –1,195,000 

Department of Defense—Excess to Requirement ........... [–1,195,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ................................. –1,195,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
494 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 44,302,280 45,599,156 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............. 1,058,114 1,301,614 

Transfer from title III—Flying Hours ............................ [180,945 ] 

Transfer from title III—MV 22B Pricing Variance ....... [82,555 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Temporary Duty ....................... [–20,000 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ........................................................ 7,700 7,700 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES .......................................................................... 9,200 9,200 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .................... 12,934 12,934 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................................................... 39,566 39,566 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ................................. 174,052 174,052 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................. 1,586 1,586 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................... 50,852 50,852 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................... 1,132,948 1,107,948 

Realignment of Funding to SAG 2C1H not Accounted 

for in Budget Documentation ...................................... [–25,000 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING .................. 26,822 26,822 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................ 998,172 998,172 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ........................................... 26,533 26,533 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ............................................................. 22,657 22,657 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ................................................................................. 28,141 28,141 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ............................................. 1,932,640 2,125,441 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Expeditionary Combat 

Command Increases ..................................................... [192,801 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ........................................... 19,891 19,891 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS ..... 5,465 5,465 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ................................................................................... 2,093 10,393 

Transfer from title III—JSOTF-Philippines ................. [8,300 ] 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ................ 125,460 134,460 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Expeditionary Combat 

Command ..................................................................... [9,000 ] 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ................................................ 201,083 166,083 

Unjustified Growth for Weapons Sustainment .............. [–35,000 ] 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ........................... 1,457 1,457 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ........................................... 5,095 –5,095 

Navy-Identified Excess for Network Management Systems ............................................................................... [–5,095 ] 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .................................................................................... 26,793 26,793 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................ 352,210 394,880 

Civilian Pay Overstatement Due to No Requirement 

for FTE in this SAG .................................................... [–7,330 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Regional/Emergency Operations Center ................................................................ [50,000 ] 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................. 495,000 

Transfer from Base: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ........................................ [495,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 6,261,464 7,187,640 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ............................. 29,010 29,010 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS ......... 34,300 64,304 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
495 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Realignment of Funding from 1B1B not Accounted for 

in Budget Documentation ............................................ [25,000 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Medical/Equipment costs for 

USNS MERCY ............................................................. [5,004 ] 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT .................................................. 258,278 –258,278 

Direct Appropriation to Department of Homeland Security ............................................................................. [–258,278 ] 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ..................................... 321,588 93,314 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ....................................... 69,961 72,961 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Sea Systems Command 

Visit, Board, Search and Seizure (VBSS)/Explosive 

Ordnance Device (EOD) Training .............................. [3,000 ] 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................... 5,400 5,400 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......... 75,361 78,361 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 2,348 2,348 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT .................................................................................. 6,142 18,699 

Transfer from Title III: Family Readiness Programs ... [3,557 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Navy Manpower and Personnel System/NSIPS ................................................. [9,000 ] 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................ 5,849 5,849 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ................................ 28,511 28,511 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................. 263,593 238,593 

Unjustified Growth for Transportation Estimates ........ [–25,000 ] 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ............ 17,414 17,414 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS .......... 1,075 1,075 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ................................... 6,564 6,564 

650 FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE .............................. 14,598 14,598 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 2,060 2,060 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ......... 348,154 335,711 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 7,006,567 7,695,026 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ..................................................... 2,069,485 2,086,485 

Marine Corps Requested Transfer for Family of Shelters from Procurement, Marine Corps line 38 ........... [17,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ................................................................ 575,843 575,843 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................... 251,100 363,100 

Transfer from Title III: Depot Maintenance .................. [112,000 ] 

070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................ 82,514 82,514 

075 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................. 235,000 

Transfer from Title III: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ........................................ [235,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 2,978,942 3,342,942 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

130 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................... 209,784 209,784 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......... 209,784 209,784 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................. 376,495 376,495 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
496 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

190 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 5,989 5,989 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ......... 382,484 382,484 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS .......................................................... 3,571,210 3,935,210 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ............................................. 2,115,901 2,185,901 

Transfer from Title III—Theater Security Package ...... [70,000 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ................................ 2,033,929 2,033,929 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ............................................................................... 46,844 46,844 

050 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................... 312,361 312,361 

060 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................... 334,950 334,950 

070 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................... 641,404 641,404 

080 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ............................... 69,330 69,330 

090 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS .......................... 297,015 297,015 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................................. 16,833 16,833 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ................................................................................... 46,390 63,750 

Transfer from Title III: CENTCOM HQ C4 .................. [12,500 ] 

Transfer from Title III: CENTCOM Public Affairs ...... [4,860 ] 

145 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................. 470,000 

Transfer from Title III: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ........................................ [470,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 5,914,957 6,472,317 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ........................................................ 3,533,338 3,533,338 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS .................................... 85,416 85,416 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................... 161,678 161,678 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................... 9,485 9,485 

190 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................... 30,033 30,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ..................................... 3,819,950 3,819,950 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................... 908 908 

240 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................... 2,280 2,280 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ....................................... 29,592 29,592 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................. 154 154 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ............ 691 691 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................... 753 753 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......... 34,378 34,378 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS .................................................. 155,121 155,121 

390 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................... 20,677 20,677 

400 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 3,320 3,320 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ................................ 111,561 111,561 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................ 605,223 605,223 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 54,000 54,000 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ......... 949,902 949,902 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
497 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................. –25,000 

Unjustified Growth in Civilian Personnel Costs ........... [–25,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ................................. –25,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE ..................................................................... 10,719,187 11,251,547 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF .................................................. 2,000 2,000 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ................................. 3,269,939 3,295,239 

Military Information Support Activities—Transfer 

from Base ...................................................................... [50,300 ] 

Unjustified Program Growth in Operating Support for 

Operation New Dawn .................................................. [–25,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 3,271,939 3,297,239 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY .......................... 23,478 23,478 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY .......... 87,925 87,925 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ............. 164,520 164,520 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ........................... 102,322 67,322 

Unjustified Program Growth .......................................... [–35,000 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY .............................................. 15,457 15,457 

185 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY— 

OTHER ................................................................................ 2,200,000 2,140,000 

Coalition Support Funds: Excess to Need for Contract 

Renewal ........................................................................ [–60,000 ] 

220 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 194,100 267,100 

Transfer from Title III: Child Care and Counseling .... [73,000 ] 

260 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ................. 143,870 143,870 

275 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 3,065,800 3,041,800 

Classified Adjustment ..................................................... [–24,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ......... 5,997,472 5,951,472 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE .......................................................... 9,269,411 9,248,711 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ........................................... 84,200 84,200 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................ 28,100 28,100 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............... 20,700 20,700 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................... 84,500 84,500 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 217,500 217,500 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

RESERVE ................................................................ 217,500 217,500 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............. 38,402 38,402 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ..................................... 400 400 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ................................. 11,330 11,330 

060 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................... 10,137 10,137 

100 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ............................................. 13,827 13,827 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
498 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

140 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................ 52 52 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 74,148 74,148 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

RESERVE ................................................................ 74,148 74,148 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES .......................................................... 31,284 31,284 

050 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ............................................ 4,800 4,800 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 36,084 36,084 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE ...................................... 36,084 36,084 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ............................................. 4,800 4,800 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................... 131,000 131,000 

050 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................... 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 142,050 142,050 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE RESERVE ................................................. 142,050 142,050 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL 

GUARD 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS .............................................................. 89,930 89,930 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................... 130,848 130,848 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............... 110,011 100,011 

Duplicate Request for Military Pay Support Contract 

(Requested in both SAG 121 and SAG 131) .............. [–10,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................... 34,788 34,788 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ ........................ 21,967 21,967 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 387,544 377,544 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

NATIONAL GUARD .............................................. 387,544 377,544 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL 

GUARD 

OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ................................... 34,050 34,050 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .......................... 34,050 34,050 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 

NATIONAL GUARD .............................................. 34,050 34,050 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 

MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................. 1,304,350 1,304,350 

020 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ........................... 1,667,905 1,432,490 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ............................... [–235,415 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
499 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

030 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS .......................................... 751,073 751,073 

040 SUSTAINMENT ..................................................................... 3,331,774 3,033,984 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ............................... [–297,790 ] 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE .................... 7,055,102 6,521,897 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................. 1,128,584 1,128,584 

070 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ........................... 1,530,420 601,915 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ............................... [–928,505 ] 

080 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS .......................................... 1,102,430 1,102,430 

090 SUSTAINMENT ..................................................................... 1,938,715 1,800,425 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ............................... [–138,290 ] 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ................... 5,700,149 4,633,354 

ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES 

110 SUSTAINMENT ..................................................................... 21,187 21,187 

120 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS .......................................... 7,344 7,344 

130 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................. 15,000 15,000 

150 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ........................... 1,218 1,218 

SUBTOTAL ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES ................. 44,749 44,749 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES 

FUND ....................................................................... 12,800,000 11,200,000 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

POWER 

010 POWER ................................................................................... 300,000 300,000 

020 TRANSPORTATION .............................................................. 100,000 100,000 

030 WATER .................................................................................... 50,000 50,000 

040 OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES ......................................... 25,000 –50,000 

Authorization Adjustment ............................................... [–75,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL POWER ..................................................... 475,000 400,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE 

FUND ....................................................................... 475,000 400,000 

UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 

UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 

010 UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS .................... –4,000,000 

Reduction to reflect policy change on troop strength in 

Afghanistan .................................................................. [–4,000,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................... –4,000,000 

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................... –4,000,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ............ 89,035,031 86,211,026 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
500 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

MILITARY PERSONNEL ............................................................. 142,828,848 141,992,228 

Unobligated Balances (Section 421) ............................. [–325,620 ] 

Hostile fire pay proration .............................................. [–42,000 ] 

Reduction of Army Referral Bonus ............................... [–21,000 ] 

Undistributed transfer to Title XV ................................. [–448,000 ] 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

MILITARY PERSONNEL ..................................................................... 11,228,566 11,676,566 

Undistributed transfer from Title IV ..................................... [448,000 ] 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ........................... 101,194 101,194 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ................. 101,194 101,194 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

CONTAINER DECONSOLIDATION 

WAR RESERVE MATERIAL ....................................................... 65,372 65,372 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE ...... 65,372 65,372 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

ADJ TO MATCH CONTINUING RESOLUTION 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .................................... 31,614 31,614 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSEWIDE ................................................................................... 31,614 31,614 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................... 1,376,830 1,376,830 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ................. 1,376,830 1,376,830 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 

T-AKE 

MPF MLP ....................................................................................... 425,865 400,000 

Revised Mobile Landing Platform acquisition strategy [–25,865 ] 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING ....................................... 24,161 24,161 

NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL .......................................... 1,138 1,138 

LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE .................................... 92,567 92,567 

DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ...................................... 184,109 184,109 

TAH MAINTENANCE .................................................................. 40,831 40,831 

STRATEGIC SEALIFT SUPPORT 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 48,443 48,443 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
501 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

READY RESERVE FORCE .......................................................... 309,270 309,270 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ......... 1,126,384 1,100,519 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE ......................................................................... 8,148,856 8,148,856 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ........................................................... 16,377,272 16,047,272 

TRICARE Historical Execution ..................................... [–330,000 ] 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ..................................... 2,193,821 2,193,821 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ............................................... 1,422,697 1,422,697 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ..................................................... 312,102 307,102 

Contract Savings from Web Site Consolidation ........... [–2,000 ] 

Strategic Communications ............................................. [–3,000 ] 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................... 705,347 693,647 

Unjustified Growth for Travel ....................................... [–11,700 ] 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS ............................. 1,742,451 1,738,840 

Adjustment for Civilian Pay Error ............................... [–3,611 ] 

Prohibit TRICARE Prime Fee Increase for 1 year 

WOUNDED WARRIOR MILITARY ADAPTIVE SPORTS 

PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ...... 2,935 2,935 

BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 

APPLIED BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................. 33,805 33,805 

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 3,694 3,694 

MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................... 767 767 

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............................ 181,042 181,042 

MEDICAL PRODUCTS SUPPORT AND ADVANCED CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 167,481 167,481 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................. 176,345 176,345 

MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................... 34,559 34,559 

SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH 

MEDICAL PROGRAM-WIDE ACTIVITIES ................................ 48,313 48,313 

MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES .................................................................. 14,765 14,765 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................ 632,518 632,518 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ....................... 32,198,770 31,848,459 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 

CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M ......................................... 1,147,691 1,147,691 

CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E ..................................... 406,731 406,731 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ................................................................................... 1,554,422 1,554,422 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE ....................................................................... 1,156,282 1,153,330 

PC 2360 EUCOM Tactical Analysis Team Support— 

Previously Denied New Start ...................................... [–952 ] 

PC 9205 EUCOM Counternarcotics Operations Support—Authorization Adjustment for Unjustified 

Growth .......................................................................... [–2,000 ] 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER 

DRUG ACTIVITIES ......................................................... 1,156,282 1,153,330 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ............................................... 286,919 327,419 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
502 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Program increase—Growth plan ................................... [40,500 ] 

RDT&E ........................................................................................... 1,600 4,500 

Program increase—Growth plan ................................... [2,900 ] 

PROCUREMENT .......................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ..... 289,519 332,919 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ............................. 37,900,387 37,564,659 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS 

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ................................... 54,000 54,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ......................... 54,000 54,000 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ........................................... 10,000 10,000 

CONTAINER DECONSOLIDATION .................................................. 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .............. 12,000 12,000 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

ADJ TO MATCH CONTINUING RESOLUTION 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) ............................................ 369,013 369,013 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ..... 369,013 369,013 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE ................................................................................. 641,996 641,996 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................... 464,869 464,869 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ............................................. 95,994 95,994 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 5,548 5,548 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 751 751 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ........................................................... 16,859 16,859 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS ..................................... 2,271 2,271 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ............................... 1,228,288 1,228,288 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE .......................................................................................... 486,458 456,458 

CTF–Kabul HQ Facility—Funding No Longer Required .... [–5,000 ] 

Mi–17s—Change in Acquisition Strategy ............................. [–8,000 ] 

Program adjustment .............................................................. [–7,000 ] 

Reduce Program Growth (Pakistan) ..................................... [–10,000 ] 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG 

ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 486,458 456,458 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ....................................................... 11,055 11,055 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ............. 11,055 11,055 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ..................................... 2,160,814 2,130,814 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
503 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Afghanistan 

Army Bagram Air Base Barracks, Ph 5 ........................................... 29,000 29,000 

Army Bagram Air Base Construct Drainage System, Ph 3 ............. 31,000 31,000 

Army Bagram Air Base Entry Control Point ................................... 20,000 20,000 

Alabama 

Army Fort Rucker Combat Readiness Center .......................... 11,600 11,600 

Alaska 

Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Complex, Ph 3A .......................... 114,000 57,000 

Army Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Brigade Complex, Ph 2 .............................. 74,000 74,000 

Army Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Organizational Parking ............................. 3,600 3,600 

Army Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Physical Fitness Facility ............................ 26,000 26,000 

California 

Army Fort Irwin Infantry Squad Battle Course ................... 7,500 7,500 

Army Fort Irwin Qualification Training Range ................... 15,500 15,500 

Army Presidio Monterey General Instruction Building .................... 3,000 3,000 

Colorado 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Loading Area ................................ 34,000 34,000 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ................... 63,000 63,000 

Army Fort Carson Barracks ..................................................... 46,000 46,000 

Army Fort Carson Barracks ..................................................... 67,000 67,000 

Army Fort Carson Brigade Headquarters ............................... 14,400 14,400 

Army Fort Carson Control Tower ............................................. 14,200 14,200 

Georgia 

Army Fort Benning Land Acquisition ........................................ 25,000 25,000 

Army Fort Benning Land Acquisition ........................................ 5,100 5,100 

Army Fort Benning Rail Loading Facility ................................. 13,600 13,600 

Army Fort Benning Trainee Barracks Complex, Ph 3 .............. 23,000 23,000 

Army Fort Gordon Hand Grenade Familiarization Range ..... 1,450 1,450 

Army Fort Stewart Dog Kennel ................................................. 2,600 2,600 

Germany 

Army Germersheim Central Distribution Facility ..................... 21,000 0 

Army Germersheim Infrastructure ............................................. 16,500 0 

Army Grafenwoehr Barracks ..................................................... 17,500 17,500 

Army Grafenwoehr Chapel ......................................................... 15,500 15,500 

Army Grafenwoehr Convoy Live Fire Range ............................. 5,000 5,000 

Army Landstuhl Satellite Communications Center ............. 24,000 24,000 

Army Landstuhl Satellite Communications Center ............. 39,000 39,000 

Army Oberdachstetten Automated Record Fire Range .................. 12,200 12,200 

Army Stuttgart Access Control Point .................................. 12,200 12,200 

Army Vilseck Barracks ..................................................... 20,000 20,000 

Hawaii 

Army Fort Shafter Child Development Center ......................... 17,500 17,500 

Army Schofield Barracks Centralized Wash Facility ......................... 32,000 32,000 

Army Schofield Barracks Combat Aviation Brigade Complex, Ph 1 73,000 73,000 

Honduras 

Army Honduras Various Barracks ..................................................... 25,000 0 

Kansas 

Army Forbes Air Field Deployment Support Facility ..................... 5,300 5,300 

Army Fort Riley Chapel ......................................................... 10,400 10,400 

Army Fort Riley Physical Fitness Facility ............................ 13,000 13,000 

Army Fort Riley Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance 

Hangar.

60,000 60,000 

Kentucky 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
504 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Army Fort Campbell Barracks ..................................................... 23,000 23,000 

Army Fort Campbell Barracks Complex ...................................... 65,000 65,000 

Army Fort Campbell Physical Fitness Facility ............................ 18,500 18,500 

Army Fort Campbell Scout/RECCE Gunnery Range ................. 18,000 18,000 

Army Fort Campbell Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance 

Hangar.

67,000 67,000 

Army Fort Campbell Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 16,000 16,000 

Army Fort Campbell Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 40,000 40,000 

Army Fort Knox Automated Infantry Platoon Battle 

Course.

7,000 7,000 

Army Fort Knox Battalion Complex ...................................... 48,000 48,000 

Korea 

Army Camp Carroll Barracks ..................................................... 41,000 41,000 

Army Camp Henry Barracks Complex ...................................... 48,000 48,000 

Louisiana 

Army Fort Polk Brigade Complex ........................................ 23,000 23,000 

Army Fort Polk Fire Station ................................................ 9,200 9,200 

Army Fort Polk Land Acquisition ........................................ 27,000 27,000 

Army Fort Polk Military Working Dog Facility .................. 2,600 2,600 

Army Fort Polk Multipurpose Machine Gun Range ........... 8,300 8,300 

Maryland 

Army Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Auto Technology Evaluation Fac, Ph 3 .... 15,500 15,500 

Army Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Command and Control Facility ................ 63,000 63,000 

Army Fort Meade Applied Instruction Facility ...................... 43,000 43,000 

Army Fort Meade Brigade Complex ........................................ 36,000 36,000 

Missouri 

Army Fort Leonard 

Wood 

Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 49,000 49,000 

New York 

Army Fort Drum Ammunition Supply Point ......................... 5,700 5,700 

Army Fort Drum Chapel ......................................................... 7,600 7,600 

North Carolina 

Army Fort Bragg Access Roads, Ph 2 ..................................... 18,000 18,000 

Army Fort Bragg Battle Command Training Center ............ 23,000 23,000 

Army Fort Bragg Brigade Complex Facilities ....................... 49,000 49,000 

Army Fort Bragg NCO Academy ............................................ 42,000 42,000 

Army Fort Bragg Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance 

Hangar.

54,000 54,000 

Oklahoma 

Army Fort Sill Battle Command Training Center ............ 23,000 23,000 

Army Fort Sill Chapel ......................................................... 13,200 13,200 

Army Fort Sill Physical Fitness Facility ............................ 25,000 25,000 

Army Fort Sill Rail Deployment Facility ........................... 3,400 3,400 

Army Fort Sill Reception Station, Ph 1 ............................. 36,000 36,000 

Army Fort Sill THAAD Instruction Facility ...................... 33,000 33,000 

Army Fort Sill Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 51,000 51,000 

Army Mcalester Ammunition Loading Pads ....................... 1,700 1,700 

Army Mcalester Railroad Tracks ......................................... 6,300 6,300 

South Carolina 

Army Fort Jackson Modified Record Fire Range ...................... 4,900 4,900 

Army Fort Jackson Trainee Barracks Complex, Ph 2 .............. 59,000 59,000 

Texas 

Army Fort Bliss Applied Instruction Building .................... 8,300 8,300 

Army Fort Bliss Barracks Complex ...................................... 13,000 13,000 

Army Fort Bliss Electronics Maintenance Facility .............. 14,600 14,600 

Army Fort Bliss Infrastructure ............................................. 14,600 11,600 

Army Fort Bliss JLENS Tactical Training Facility ........... 39,000 39,000 

Army Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 19,000 19,000 

Army Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 14,600 14,600 

Army Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 24,000 0 

Army Fort Bliss Water Well, Potable .................................... 2,400 2,400 

Army Fort Hood Operational Readiness Training Complex 51,000 51,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
505 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Army Fort Hood Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance 

Hangar.

47,000 47,000 

Army Fort Hood Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 18,500 18,500 

Army Fort Hood Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 15,500 15,500 

Army Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Vehicle Maintenance Facility .................... 10,400 10,400 

Army Red River Army 

Depot 

Maneuver Systems Sustainment Ctr, Ph 3 44,000 44,000 

Utah 

Army Dugway Proving 

Ground 

Life Sciences Test Facility Addition ......... 32,000 32,000 

Virginia 

Army Fort Belvoir Information Dominance Center, Ph 1 ....... 52,000 52,000 

Army Fort Belvoir Road and Infrastucture Improvements ..... 31,000 0 

Army Joint Base Langley Eustis Aviation Training Facility ......................... 26,000 26,000 

Washington 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Air Support Operations Facilities ............. 7,300 7,300 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Aviation Complex, Ph 1B .......................... 48,000 48,000 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Aviation Unit Complex, Ph 1A .................. 34,000 34,000 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Battalion Complex ...................................... 59,000 59,000 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Brigade Complex, Ph 2 .............................. 56,000 56,000 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Infrastructure, Ph 1 ................................... 64,000 64,000 

Army Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Operational Readiness Training Cplx, Ph 

1.

28,000 28,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Community Facilities ................................. 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Host Nation Support .................................. 25,500 25,500 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Minor Construction .................................... 20,000 20,000 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design .................................... 229,741 184,741 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

R&D Facilities ............................................ 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Supply Facilities ........................................ 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Training Facilities ..................................... 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Troop Housing Facilities ........................... 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Troop Housing Facilities ........................... 0 0 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities and Ground Improvements ......... 0 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
506 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Total Military Construction, Army 3,235,991 3,013,491 

Arizona 

Navy Yuma Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ................... 39,515 39,515 

Navy Yuma Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ...... 81,897 81,897 

Navy Yuma JSF Auxiliary Landing Field .................... 41,373 41,373 

Bahrain Island 

Navy SW Asia Bachelor Enlisted Quarters ....................... 55,010 55,010 

Navy SW Asia Waterfront Development Phase 4 .............. 45,194 0 

California 

Navy Barstow Dip Tank Cleaning Facility ....................... 8,590 8,590 

Navy Bridgeport Multi-Purpose Building—Addition ........... 19,238 16,138 

Navy Camp Pendleton Armory, 1st Marine Division ..................... 12,606 12,606 

Navy Camp Pendleton Individual Equipment Issue Warehouse .. 16,411 16,411 

Navy Camp Pendleton Infantry Squad Defense Range ................. 29,187 29,187 

Navy Camp Pendleton Intersection Bridge and Improvements ..... 12,476 12,476 

Navy Camp Pendleton MV–22 Aviation Fuel Storage ................... 6,163 6,163 

Navy Camp Pendleton MV–22 Aviation Pavement ........................ 18,530 18,530 

Navy Camp Pendleton MV–22 Double Hangar Replacement ........ 48,345 48,345 

Navy Camp Pendleton New Potable Water Conveyance ................ 113,091 113,091 

Navy Camp Pendleton North Area Waste Water Conveyance ....... 78,271 78,271 

Navy Coronado Multi Purpose Facility North Island ........ 46,763 46,763 

Navy Coronado Rotary Aircraft Depot Maint Fac (North 

Is.).

61,672 61,672 

Navy Point Mugu E–2D Aircrew Training Facility ............... 15,377 15,377 

Navy Twentynine Palms Child Development Center ......................... 23,743 23,743 

Navy Twentynine Palms Land Expansion ......................................... 8,665 8,665 

Navy Twentynine Palms Multi-Use Operational Fitness Area ......... 18,819 18,819 

Navy Twentynine Palms Tracked Vehicle Maintenance Cover ......... 15,882 15,882 

Diego Garcia 

Navy Diego Garcia Potable Water Plant Modernization .......... 35,444 35,444 

Djibouti 

Navy Camp Lemonier Aircraft Logistics Apron ............................ 35,170 35,170 

Navy Camp Lemonier Bachelor Quarters ...................................... 43,529 43,529 

Navy Camp Lemonier Taxiway Enhancement ............................... 10,800 10,800 

Florida 

Navy Jacksonville Bams UAS Operator Training Facility .... 4,482 4,482 

Navy Jacksonville P–8A Hangar Upgrades ............................. 6,085 6,085 

Navy Jacksonville P–8A Training Facility .............................. 25,985 25,985 

Navy Mayport Massey Avenue Corridor Improvements ... 14,998 14,998 

Navy Whiting Field Applied Instruction Facilities, EOD 

Course.

20,620 20,620 

Georgia 

Navy Kings Bay Crab Island Security Enclave ................... 52,913 52,913 

Navy Kings Bay WRA Land/Water Interface ...................... 33,150 33,150 

Guam 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Finegayan Water Utilities ......................... 77,267 0 

Navy Joint Region Marianas North Ramp Utilities—Anderson AFB 

(Inc).

78,654 0 

Hawaii 

Navy Barking Sands North Loop Electrical Replacement .......... 9,679 9,679 

Navy Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

Navy Information Operations Command 

Fes Fac.

7,492 7,492 

Navy Kaneohe Bay MCAS Operations Complex ....................... 57,704 57,704 

Illinois 

Navy Great Lakes Decentralize Steam System ....................... 91,042 91,042 

Maryland 

Navy Indian Head Decentralize Steam System ....................... 67,779 67,779 

Navy Patuxent River Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2 ........... 45,844 45,844 

North Carolina 

Navy Camp Lejeune 2nd Combat Engineer Maintenance/Ops 

Complex.

75,214 75,214 

Navy Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Wallace 

Creek.

27,439 27,439 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
507 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Navy Camp Lejeune Base Entry Point and Road ...................... 81,008 81,008 

Navy Camp Lejeune Squad Battle Course .................................. 16,821 16,821 

Navy Cherry Point Marine Corps Air 

Station 

H–1 Helicopter Gearbox Repair & Test 

Facility.

17,760 17,760 

Navy New River Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and Apron 69,511 69,511 

Navy New River Ordnance Loading Area Additiion ........... 9,419 9,419 

South Carolina 

Navy Beaufort Vertical Landing Pads ............................... 21,096 21,096 

Virginia 

Navy Norfolk Bachelor Quarters, Homeport Ashore ....... 81,304 81,304 

Navy Norfolk Decentralize Steam System ....................... 26,924 26,924 

Navy Portsmouth Controlled Industrial Facility ................... 74,864 74,864 

Navy Quantico Academic Instruction Facility ................... 75,304 75,304 

Navy Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters ....................... 31,374 31,374 

Navy Quantico Embassy Security Group Facilities ........... 27,079 27,079 

Navy Quantico Enlisted Dining Facility ............................ 5,034 5,034 

Navy Quantico Realign Purvis Rd/Russell Rd Intersection.6,442 6,442 

Navy Quantico The Basic School Student Quarters— 

Phase 6.

28,488 28,488 

Navy Quantico Waste Water Treatment Plant—Upshur ... 9,969 9,969 

Washington 

Navy Bremerton Integrated Dry Dock Water Treatment 

Fac Ph1.

13,341 13,341 

Navy Kitsap EHW Security Force Facility (Bangor) ..... 25,948 25,948 

Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc. 1) .... 78,002 78,002 

Navy Kitsap Waterfront Restricted Area Vehicle Barriers.17,894 17,894 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance & Production Facilities ....... 0 0 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 84,362 69,362 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

R&D Facilities ............................................ 0 0 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Troop Housing Facilities ........................... 0 0 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Constr .......................... 21,495 21,495 

Total Military Construction, Navy 2,461,547 2,242,332 

Alaska 

AF Eielson AFB Dormitory (168 Rm) ................................... 45,000 45,000 

AF Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Brigade Combat Team (Light) Complex, 

(480 RM).

97,000 97,000 

Arizona 

AF Davis-Monthan 

AFB 

EC–130H Simulator/Training Operations.20,500 20,500 

AF Davis-Monthan 

AFB 

HC–130J Joint Use Fuel Cell ................... 12,500 12,500 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Adal Aircraft Maintenance Unit ...... 6,000 6,000 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Squad Ops/AMU 2 .......................... 18,000 18,000 

California 

AF Travis AFB Dormitory (144 Rm) ................................... 22,000 22,000 

AF Vandenberg AFB Education Center ....................................... 14,200 14,200 

Colorado 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
508 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

AF U.S. Air Force 

Academy 

Construct Large Vehicle Inspection Facility.13,400 13,400 

Delaware 

AF Dover AFB C–5M Formal Training Unit Facility ....... 2,800 2,800 

Florida 

AF Patrick AFB Air Force Technical Applications Ctr— 

Incr 2.

79,000 79,000 

Germany 

AF Ramstein Ab Dormitory (192 Rm) ................................... 34,697 34,697 

Greenland 

AF Thule Ab Dormitory (72 Pn) ...................................... 28,000 28,000 

Guam 

AF Joint Region Marianas Air Freight Terminal Complex .................. 35,000 35,000 

AF Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Clear Water Rinse Facility 7,500 7,500 

AF Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Conventional Munitions 

Maintenanc.

11,700 11,700 

AF Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Fuel Systems Maintenance 

Hangar, Incr 1.

128,000 0 

AF Joint Region Marianas PRTC Combat Communications Combat 

Support.

9,800 9,800 

AF Joint Region Marianas PRTC Combat Communications Transmission Syst.5,600 5,600 

AF Joint Region Marianas PRTC Red Horse Cantonment Operations 

Facility.

14,000 14,000 

Italy 

AF Sigonella UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility .. 15,000 15,000 

Kansas 

AF Fort Riley Air Support Operations Center ................. 7,600 7,600 

Korea 

AF Osan AB Dormitory (156 Rm) ................................... 23,000 23,000 

Louisiana 

AF Barksdale AFB Mission Support Group Complex .............. 23,500 23,500 

Missouri 

AF Whiteman AFB WSA Security Control Facility .................. 4,800 4,800 

Nebraska 

AF Offutt AFB STRATCOM Replacement Facility Incr 1 150,000 120,000 

Nevada 

AF Nellis AFB Communications Network Control Center 11,600 11,600 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Add/Alter Engine Shop ................... 2,750 2,750 

AF Nellis AFB F–35A AGE Facility ................................... 21,500 21,500 

New Mexico 

AF Cannon AFB Adal Wastewater Treatment Plant ........... 7,598 7,598 

AF Cannon AFB Dormitory (96 Rm) ..................................... 15,000 15,000 

AF Holloman AFB Child Development Center ......................... 11,200 11,200 

AF Holloman AFB F–16 Academic Facility ............................. 5,800 5,800 

AF Holloman AFB F–16 SEAD Training Facility ................... 4,200 4,200 

AF Holloman AFB Parallel Taxiway 07/25 ............................. 8,000 8,000 

AF Kirtland AFB AFNWC Sustainment Center .................... 25,000 25,000 

North Carolina 

AF Pope AFB C–130 Flight Simulator ............................. 6,000 6,000 

North Dakota 

AF Minot AFB B–52 3–Bay Conventional Munitions 

Maintenance.

11,800 11,800 

AF Minot AFB B–52 Two-Bay Phase Maintenance Dock 34,000 34,000 

AF Minot AFB Dormitory (168 Rm) ................................... 22,000 22,000 

Qatar 

AF AL Udeid Blatchford Preston Complex, Phase IV ..... 37,000 0 

Texas 

AF Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Adv Indiv Training (AIT) Barracks (300 

Rm).

46,000 46,000 

AF Joint Base San 

Antonio 

BMT Recruit Dormitory 4, Phase IV ........ 64,000 64,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
509 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Utah 

AF Hill AFB F–22 System Support Facility ................... 16,500 16,500 

AF Hill AFB F–35 Adal Hangar 45E/AMU .................. 6,800 0 

Virginia 

AF Joint Base Langley Eustis AIT Barracks Complex, Ph 2 .................... 50,000 50,000 

Washington 

AF Fairchild AFB SERE Force Support Ph 2 ......................... 14,000 14,000 

AF Fairchild AFB Wing Headquarters .................................... 13,600 13,600 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Community Facilities ................................. 0 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Community Facilities ................................. 0 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance & Production Facilities ....... 0 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Operational Facilities ................................ 0 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design .................................... 81,913 52,913 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Supporting Facilities ................................. 0 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 20,000 20,000 

Total Military Construction, Air Force 1,364,858 1,134,058 

Alabama 

Def-Wide Maxwell AFB Expand 800 Area Chiller Loop, Gunter 

Annex.

0 2,482 

Alabama 

Def-Wide Redstone Arsenal Von Braun Complex Phase IV ................... 58,800 58,800 

Alaska 

Def-Wide Anchorage SOF Cold Weather Maritime Training 

Facility.

18,400 18,400 

Def-Wide Eielson AFB Upgrade Rail Line ..................................... 14,800 14,800 

Arizona 

Def-Wide Davis-Monthan 

AFB 

CNS Thermal Storage ............................... 0 4,650 

Arizona 

Def-Wide Davis-Monthan 

AFB 

Replace Hydrant Fuel System ................... 23,000 23,000 

Belgium 

Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility .................... 24,118 0 

California 

Def-Wide Camp Pendleton SOF Military Working Dog Facility ......... 3,500 3,500 

Def-Wide Camp Pendleton SOF Range 130 Support Projects ............. 8,641 8,641 

Def-Wide Coronado SOF Support Activity Operations Facility 42,000 42,000 

Def-Wide Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy Replace Public Safety Center .................... 15,500 15,500 

Def-Wide Point Loma Annex Replace Fuel Storage Facilities Incr 4 ...... 27,000 27,000 

Def-Wide Presidio of Monterey 1 Mw Solar Grid ........................................ 0 5,000 

Def-Wide San Clemente Replace Fuel Storage Tanks & Pipeline ... 21,800 21,800 

Def-Wide San Joaquin/ 

Tracy Site 

400 KW Solar PV System, Building 58 

Roof.

0 2,860 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
510 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Colorado 

Def-Wide Buckley AFB Mountainview Operations Facility, Incr 1 140,932 70,432 

Def-Wide Fort Carson Microgrid Expansion PEV Tie-in (SPIDERS).0 4,277 

District of Columbia 

Def-Wide Bolling AFB Cooling Tower Expansion .......................... 2,070 2,070 

Def-Wide Bolling AFB DIAC Parking Garage ............................... 13,586 13,586 

Def-Wide Bolling AFB Electrical Upgrades .................................... 1,080 1,080 

Florida 

Def-Wide Eglin AFB Medical Clinic ............................................ 11,600 11,600 

Def-Wide Eglin AFB SOF Company Operations Facility (GSB) 21,000 21,000 

Def-Wide Eglin AFB SOF Company Operations Facility 

(GSTB).

19,000 19,000 

Def-Wide Eglin Aux 9 SOF Enclosed Engine Noise Suppressors 3,200 3,200 

Def-Wide Eglin Aux 9 SOF Simulator Facility ............................. 6,300 6,300 

Def-Wide Macdill AFB SOF Acquisition Center (Phase II) ........... 15,200 15,200 

Def-Wide Tyndall AFB Reclaimed Water Irrigation ....................... 0 3,255 

Def-Wide Whiting Field Truck Load/Unload Facility ..................... 3,800 3,800 

Georgia 

Def-Wide Fort Benning Replace McBride Elementary School ........ 37,205 37,205 

Def-Wide Fort Gordon Whitelaw Wedge Building Addition ......... 11,340 17,705 

Def-Wide Fort Stewart Hospital Addition/Alteration Phase 2 ..... 72,300 72,300 

Def-Wide MCLB Albany LFG Generator ........................................... 0 3,504 

Germany 

Def-Wide Ansbach Ansbach Middle/High School Addition ... 11,672 11,672 

Def-Wide Baumholder Replace Wetzel-Smith Elementary Schools 59,419 59,419 

Def-Wide Grafenwoehr Netzaberg MS School Addition ................. 6,529 6,529 

Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance 

Barracks 

Medical Center Replacement Incr 1 .......... 70,592 70,592 

Def-Wide Spangdalem AB Replace Bitburg Elementary School ......... 41,876 41,876 

Def-Wide Spangdalem AB Replace Bitburg Middle & High School ... 87,167 87,167 

Def-Wide Stuttgart-Patch 

Barracks 

DISA Europe Facility Upgrades ............... 2,434 2,434 

Guam 

Def-Wide Naval Base Guam 4 MW Wind Farm ...................................... 0 17,377 

Hawaii 

Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

Alter Warehouse Space .............................. 9,200 9,200 

Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

Upgrade Refuler Truck Parking Area ...... 5,200 5,200 

Illinois 

Def-Wide Great Lakes Health Clinic Demolition ........................... 16,900 16,900 

Italy 

Def-Wide Naval Air Station 

Naples 

345 KW Solar PV ....................................... 0 2,867 

Italy 

Def-Wide Vicenza Replace Vicenza High School .................... 41,864 41,864 

Japan 

Def-Wide Yokota AB Replace Temp Classrm/Joan K. Mendel 

ES.

12,236 12,236 

Def-Wide Yokota AB Replace Yokota High School ..................... 49,606 49,606 

Kentucky 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell Hospital Addition/Alteration .................... 56,600 56,600 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF MH47 Aviation Facility .................... 43,000 43,000 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF Rotary Wing Hangar ......................... 38,900 38,900 

Def-Wide Fort Knox GSHO Well Field for HRC ........................ 0 2,750 

Def-Wide Fort Knox Replace Kingsolver-Pierce Elementary 

Schools.

38,845 38,845 

Louisiana 

Def-Wide Barksdale AFB Hydrant Fuel System ................................. 6,200 6,200 

Marshall Islands 

Def-Wide Kwajalein Atol 468KW Solar PV System ........................... 0 6,300 

Maryland 

Def-Wide Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

USAMRICD Replacement, Inc 4 ............... 22,850 22,850 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
511 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval 

Hospital 

Child Development Center Addition/Alteration.18,000 18,000 

Def-Wide Fort Detrick USAMRIID Stage I, Inc 6 ......................... 137,600 137,600 

Def-Wide Fort Meade High Performance Computing Capacity ... 29,640 29,640 

Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center, Incr 1 ................ 242,900 154,300 

Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Dental Clinic Replacement ........................ 22,800 22,800 

Massachusetts 

Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Repair Chiller Controls B1201 .................. 0 3,609 

Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Replace Hanscom Middle School .............. 34,040 34,040 

Def-Wide Westover ARB Replace Hydrant Fuel System ................... 23,300 23,300 

Mississippi 

Def-Wide Columbus AFB Replace Refueler Parking Facility ............ 2,600 2,600 

Def-Wide Gulfport Medical Clinic Replacement ...................... 34,700 34,700 

Missouri 

Def-Wide Arnold Data Ctr West #1 Power & Cooling Upgrade.9,253 9,253 

New Mexico 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF ADAL Simulator Facility ................. 9,600 9,600 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Facility.15,000 15,000 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF Apron and Taxiway ........................... 28,100 28,100 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF C–130 Squadron Operations Facility 10,941 10,941 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF C–130 Wash Rack Hangar ............... 10,856 10,856 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF Hangar Aircraft Maintenance Unit 41,200 41,200 

Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF Squadron Operations Facility .......... 17,300 17,300 

New York 

Def-Wide Fort Drum Dental Clinic Addition/Alteration ............ 4,700 4,700 

Def-Wide Fort Drum Medical Clinic ............................................ 15,700 15,700 

Def-Wide Fort Drum Retrocommission Various Buildings ......... 0 3,500 

North Carolina 

Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Armory Facility Expansion ............... 6,670 6,670 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg Historic District GSHP & Retro Cx .......... 0 13,400 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg Hospital Alteration ..................................... 57,600 57,600 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg Replace District Superintendant’s Office .. 3,138 3,138 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Administrative Annex ....................... 12,000 12,000 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Battalion Operations Complex ......... 23,478 23,478 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Battalion Operations Facility ........... 41,000 41,000 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Brigade Headquarters ....................... 19,000 19,000 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Communications Training Complex 10,758 10,758 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Entry Control Point ........................... 2,300 2,300 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Group Headquarters ......................... 26,000 26,000 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Squadron HQ Addition ..................... 11,000 11,000 

Def-Wide Mcb Camp 

Lejeune 

Steam Decentralization of Camp Geiger .. 0 6,925 

Def-Wide New River Replace Delalio Elementary School .......... 22,687 22,687 

Def-Wide Pope AFB SOF Training Facility ............................... 5,400 5,400 

Ohio 

Def-Wide Columbus Security Enhancements ............................. 10,000 10,000 

Oklahoma 

Def-Wide Altus Install VCEP for 22 Buildings .................. 0 5,700 

Def-Wide Altus AFB Replace Fuel Transfer Pipeline ................. 8,200 8,200 

Pennsylvania 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Enclose Open-Sided Shed .......................... 3,000 0 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Replace General Purpose Warehouse ........ 25,500 25,500 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Upgrade Access Control Points ................. 17,500 17,500 

Def-Wide Philadelphia Upgrade HVAC System ............................. 8,000 8,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
512 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

South Carolina 

Def-Wide Joint Base 

Charleston 

Replace Fuel Storage & Distribution Facility.24,868 24,868 

Tennessee 

Def-Wide Arnold AFB Provide Temp. Control Cell Cooling C1 & 

C2.

0 3,300 

Texas 

Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 3 ..................... 136,700 86,700 

Def-Wide Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Ambulatory Care Center Phase 3 .............. 161,300 80,600 

Def-Wide Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Hospital Nutrition Care Department 

Add/Alt.

33,000 33,000 

United Kingdom 

Def-Wide Menwith Hill Station MHS PSC Construction Generator Plant 68,601 68,601 

Def-Wide Royal Air Force 

Alconbury 

Replace Alconbury High School ................ 35,030 35,030 

Utah 

Def-Wide Camp Williams IC CNCI Data Center 1 Inc 3 ................... 246,401 166,401 

Def-Wide Tooele Army Depot Install Stirling Solar Array ...................... 0 8,200 

Virginia 

Def-Wide Charlottesville Remote Delivery Facility ............................ 10,805 10,805 

Def-Wide Dahlgren Dahlgren E/MS School Addition ............. 1,988 1,988 

Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Building Renovation ......................... 3,814 3,814 

Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Logistic Support Facility .................. 14,402 14,402 

Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Military Working Dog Facility ......... 4,900 4,900 

Def-Wide Fort Belvoir Technology Center Third Floor Fit-Out .... 54,625 54,625 

Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek— 

Story 

SOF Seal Team Operations Facility ......... 37,000 37,000 

Def-Wide NRO/Aerospace 

Data Facility— 

East 

2 MW Bloom Box Fuel Cell ....................... 0 2,000 

Def-Wide Pentagon Heliport Control Tower/Fire Station ....... 6,457 6,457 

Def-Wide Pentagon Pentagon Memorial Pedestrian Plaza ...... 2,285 2,285 

Def-Wide Quantico Defense Access Road Improvements-Telegraph Rd.4,000 4,000 

Def-Wide Quantico DSS Headquarters Addition ..................... 42,727 42,727 

Washington 

Def-Wide Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities ......... 14,000 14,000 

Def-Wide Joint Base Lewis 

Mcchord 

SOF Company Operations Facility ........... 21,000 21,000 

Def-Wide Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pipeline ................................. 25,000 25,000 

West Virginia 

Def-Wide Camp Dawson Replace Hydrant Fuel System ................... 2,200 2,200 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Contingency Construction .......................... 10,000 10,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Defense Access Roads ................................. 0 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Energy Conservation Investment Program 135,000 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Exercise Related Construction ................... 8,417 8,417 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Minor Construction .................................... 6,100 6,100 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
513 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design (General Reduction) 0 –55,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 1,993 1,993 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 8,368 8,368 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 3,043 3,043 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 6,000 6,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 52,974 52,974 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 31,468 31,468 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 5,277 5,277 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 48,007 48,007 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

SOF Land Acquisition ............................... 0 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Supporting Activities ................................. 0 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 8,876 8,876 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Milcon ......................... 6,365 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Various ECIP ............................................. 0 20,444 

Def-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................. 227,498 227,498 

Def-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................. 66,974 66,974 

Def-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 6,571 6,571 

Wyoming 

Def-Wide Fe Warren Decentralize Base Heat Plant .................... 0 12,600 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 3,848,757 3,396,839 

Colorado 

Chem Demil Pueblo Depot Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, 

Ph XIII.

15,338 15,338 

Kentucky 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
514 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Chem Demil Blue Grass Army 

Depot 

Ammunition Demilitarization Ph XII ...... 59,974 59,974 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 75,312 75,312 

Worldwide Unspecified 

NATO NATO Security Investment Program 

NATO Security Investment Program ........ 272,611 257,611 

Total NATO Security Investment Program 272,611 257,611 

Alabama 

Army NG Fort McClellan Readiness Center Ph2 ................................ 16,500 16,500 

Arizona 

Army NG Papago Military 

Reservation 

Readiness Center ........................................ 17,800 17,800 

Arkansas 

Army NG Fort Chaffee Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point 

Range.

3,500 3,500 

California 

Army NG Camp Roberts Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility.6,160 6,160 

Army NG Camp Roberts Utilities Replacement Ph1 ......................... 32,000 32,000 

Army NG Camp San Luis 

Obispo 

Field Maintenance Shop ............................ 8,000 8,000 

Colorado 

Army NG Alamosa Readiness Center ........................................ 6,400 6,400 

Army NG Aurora Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility.3,600 3,600 

Army NG Fort Carson Barracks Complex (ORTC) ........................ 43,000 43,000 

District of Columbia 

Army NG Anacostia US Property & Fiscal Office Add/Alt ...... 5,300 5,300 

Florida 

Army NG Camp Blanding Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point 

Range.

2,400 2,400 

Army NG Camp Blanding Live Fire Shoot House ............................... 3,100 3,100 

Georgia 

Army NG Atlanta Readiness Center ........................................ 11,000 11,000 

Army NG Hinesville Maneuver Area Training & Equipment 

Site Ph1.

17,500 17,500 

Army NG Macon Readiness Center Ph1 ................................ 14,500 14,500 

Hawaii 

Army NG Kalaeloa Readiness Center Ph1 ................................ 33,000 33,000 

Illinois 

Army NG Normal Readiness Center ........................................ 10,000 10,000 

Indiana 

Army NG Camp Atterbury Deployment Processing Facility ................ 8,900 8,900 

Army NG Camp Atterbury Operations Readiness Training Cmplx 2 27,000 27,000 

Army NG Camp Atterbury Operations Readiness Training Complex 

1.

25,000 25,000 

Army NG Camp Atterbury Railhead Expansion & Container Facility 21,000 21,000 

Army NG Indianapolis JFHQ Add/Alt ........................................... 25,700 25,700 

Maine 

Army NG Bangor Readiness Center ........................................ 15,600 15,600 

Army NG Brunswick Armed Forces Reserve Center .................... 23,000 23,000 

Maryland 

Army NG Dundalk Readiness Center Add/Alt ......................... 16,000 16,000 

Army NG LA Plata Readiness Center ........................................ 9,000 9,000 

Army NG Westminster Readiness Center Add/Alt ......................... 10,400 10,400 

Massachusetts 

Army NG Natick Readiness Center ........................................ 9,000 9,000 

Minnesota 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
515 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Army NG Camp Ripley Multipurpose Machine Gun Range ........... 8,400 8,400 

Mississippi 

Army NG Camp Shelby Deployment Processing Facility ................ 12,600 12,600 

Army NG Camp Shelby Operational Readiness Training Cmplx 

Ph1.

27,000 27,000 

Army NG Camp Shelby Troop Housing (ORTC) Ph1 ...................... 25,000 25,000 

Nebraska 

Army NG Grand Island Readiness Center ........................................ 22,000 22,000 

Army NG Mead Readiness Center ........................................ 9,100 9,100 

Nevada 

Army NG Las Vegas Field Maintenance Shop ............................ 23,000 23,000 

New Jersey 

Army NG Lakehurst Army Aviation Suport Facility .................. 49,000 49,000 

New Mexico 

Army NG Santa Fe Readiness Center Add/Alt ......................... 5,200 5,200 

North Carolina 

Army NG Greensboro Readiness Center Add/Alt ......................... 3,700 3,700 

Oklahoma 

Army NG Camp Gruber Live Fire Shoot House ............................... 3,000 3,000 

Army NG Camp Gruber Upgrade-Combined Arms Collective 

Training Fac.

10,361 10,361 

Oregon 

Army NG the Dalles Readiness Center ........................................ 13,800 13,800 

Puerto Rico 

Army NG Fort Buchanan Readiness Center ........................................ 57,000 57,000 

South Carolina 

Army NG Allendale Readiness Center Add/Alt ......................... 4,300 4,300 

Utah 

Army NG Camp Williams Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range ......... 6,500 6,500 

Virginia 

Army NG Fort Pickett Combined Arms Collective Training Facility.11,000 11,000 

West Virginia 

Army NG Buckhannon Readiness Center Ph1 ................................ 10,000 10,000 

Wisconsin 

Army NG Camp Williams Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility.7,000 7,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance & Production Facilities ....... 0 0 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance & Production Facilities ....... 0 0 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Operational Facilities ................................ 0 0 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 20,671 20,671 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Training Facilities ..................................... 0 0 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Construction ........................... 0 0 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 11,700 11,700 

Wyoming 

Army NG Cheyenne Readiness Center ........................................ 8,900 8,900 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 773,592 773,592 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
516 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

California 

Army Res Fort Hunter 

Liggett 

Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 

(MPMG).

5,200 5,200 

Colorado 

Army Res Fort Collins Army Reserve Center .................................. 13,600 13,600 

Illinois 

Army Res Homewood Army Reserve Center .................................. 16,000 16,000 

Army Res Rockford Army Reserve Center/Land ....................... 12,800 12,800 

Indiana 

Army Res Fort Benjamin 

Harrison 

Army Reserve Center .................................. 57,000 57,000 

Kansas 

Army Res Kansas City Army Reserve Center/Land ....................... 13,000 13,000 

Massachusetts 

Army Res Attleboro Army Reserve Center/Land ....................... 22,000 22,000 

Minnesota 

Army Res Saint Joseph Army Reserve Center .................................. 11,800 11,800 

Missouri 

Army Res Weldon Springs Army Reserve Center .................................. 19,000 19,000 

New York 

Army Res Schenectady Army Reserve Center .................................. 20,000 20,000 

North Carolina 

Army Res Greensboro Army Reserve Center/Land ....................... 19,000 19,000 

South Carolina 

Army Res Orangeburg Army Reserve Center/Land ....................... 12,000 12,000 

Wisconsin 

Army Res Fort McCoy Automated Record Fire Range .................. 4,600 4,600 

Army Res Fort McCoy Container Loading Facility ....................... 5,300 5,300 

Army Res Fort McCoy Modified Record Fire Known Distance 

Range.

5,400 5,400 

Army Res Fort McCoy NCOA Phase III—Billeting ....................... 12,000 12,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 28,924 28,924 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 2,925 2,925 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 280,549 280,549 

Pennsylvania 

N/MC Res Pittsburgh Armed Forces Reserve Center (Pittsburgh) 13,759 13,759 

Tennessee 

N/MC Res Memphis Reserve Training Center ............................ 7,949 7,949 

Worldwide Unspecified 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

MCNR Unspecified Minor Construction ... 2,000 2,000 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 2,591 2,591 

Total Military Construction, Naval Reserve 26,299 26,299 

California 

Air NG Beale AFB Wing Operations and Training Facility ... 6,100 6,100 

Air NG Moffett Field Replace Pararescue Training Facility ...... 26,000 26,000 

Hawaii 

Air NG Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

TFI—F–22 Combat Aircraft Parking 

Apron.

12,721 12,721 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
517 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Air NG Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

TFI—F–22 Flight Simulator Facility ....... 19,800 19,800 

Air NG Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

TFI—F–22 Weapons Load Crew Training 

Facilit.

7,000 7,000 

Indiana 

Air NG Fort Wayne IAP A–10 Facility Conversion—Munitions ...... 4,000 4,000 

Maryland 

Air NG Martin State Airport TFI—C–27 Conversion - Squadron Operations.4,900 4,900 

Massachusetts 

Air NG Otis ANGB TFI—CNAF Beddown - Upgrade Facility 7,800 7,800 

Ohio 

Air NG Springfield Beckley-Map Alter Predator Operations Center ............. 6,700 6,700 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Air NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance & Production Facilities ....... 0 0 

Air NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Operational Facilities ................................ 0 0 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Minor Construction .................................... 9,000 9,000 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................. 12,225 12,225 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 116,246 116,246 

California 

AF Res March AFB Airfield Control Tower/Base Ops ............. 16,393 16,393 

South Carolina 

AF Res Charleston AFB TFI Red Horse Readiness & Trng Center 9,593 9,593 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design .................................... 2,200 2,200 

AF Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Training Facilities ..................................... 0 0 

AF Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction ............... 5,434 5,434 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 33,620 33,620 

Belgium 

FH Con Army Brussels Land Purchase for Gfoq (10 Units) ........... 10,000 0 

Germany 

FH Con Army Grafenwoehr Family Housing New Construction (26 

Units).

13,000 13,000 

FH Con Army Illesheim Family Housing Replacement 

Construc(80 Units).

41,000 41,000 

FH Con Army Vilseck Family Housing New Construction (22 

Units).

12,000 12,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Construction Improvements (276 Units) ... 103,000 103,000 

FH Con Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing P&D ................................ 7,897 7,897 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
518 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army 186,897 176,897 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 14,256 14,256 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ........................................................ 204,426 204,426 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................... 105,668 105,668 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................. 54,728 54,728 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account ............................... 605 605 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Privatization Support Costs ...................... 25,741 25,741 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ......................................... 15,797 15,797 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ......................................... 73,637 73,637 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army 494,858 494,858 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Classified Improvements ............................ 50 50 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Construction Improvements ....................... 80,546 80,546 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................. 4,208 4,208 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 84,804 84,804 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 35,290 35,290 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Housing Privatization ................................ 47,571 47,571 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ........................................................ 80,775 80,775 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing Account ......................................... 122 122 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance (RPMA & RPMC) ................ 98,132 98,132 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
519 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance Account ................................. 2,001 2,001 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................. 55,395 55,395 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................. 1,996 1,996 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account ............................... 2,165 2,165 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ......................................... 13,675 13,675 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ......................................... 67,639 67,639 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force 404,761 404,761 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Design ......................................................... 3,199 3,199 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Improvements ............................................. 97,773 97,773 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps 100,972 100,972 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 15,979 15,979 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ........................................................ 79,798 79,798 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................... 97,231 97,231 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................. 61,090 61,090 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account ............................... 476 476 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Privatization Support Costs ...................... 28,582 28,582 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ......................................... 14,510 14,510 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ......................................... 70,197 70,197 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine 

Corps 

367,863 367,863 

Worldwide Unspecified 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
520 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 70 70 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 19 19 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account .................................. 2,699 2,699 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ........................................................ 10,100 10,100 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ........................................................ 36,552 36,552 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................... 70 70 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................... 546 546 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................. 347 347 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ......................................... 30 30 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ......................................... 280 280 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ......................................... 10 10 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide 50,723 50,723 

Worldwide Unspecified 

HOAP Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Homeowers Assistance Program ............... 1,284 1,284 

Total Homeowners Assistance Fund 1,284 1,284 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FHIF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ........ 2,184 2,184 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 2,184 2,184 

Worldwide Unspecified 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

COMM ADD 3: Galena Fol, AK ................ 933 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–100: Planing, Design and Management.6,090 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–101: Various Locations .................... 5,021 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
521 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–126: NSCS, Athens, GA ................... 325 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–138: NAS Brunswick, ME ............... 421 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–157: MCSA Kansas City, MO ......... 1,442 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–158: NSA New Orleans, LA ............ 2,056 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA 9,763 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–2: NS Pascagoula, MS ..................... 515 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

DON–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria 

Reg Ap.

196 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–106: Kansas Army Ammunition 

Plant, KS.

45,769 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–110: Mississippi Army Ammo Plant, 

MS.

122 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–112: River Bank Army Ammo Plant, 

CA.

320 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–117: Deseret Chemical Depot, UT .... 34,011 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–119: Newport Chemical Depot, IN ... 467 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–120: Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR 9,092 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

IND–122: Lone Star Army Ammo Plant, 

TX.

19,367 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

INT–4: NGA Activities ............................... 1,791 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

MED–2: Walter Reed NMMC, Bethesda, 

MD.

18,586 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

MED–57: Brooks City Base, TX ................ 205 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Program Management Various Locations 828 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Program Management Various Locations 32,298 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–113: Fort Monroe, VA ....................... 23,601 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–121: Fort Gillem, GA ........................ 8,903 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
522 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–131: USAR Command and Control—SE.250 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–166: USAR Command and Control—NW.1,000 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–167: USAR Command and Control—NE.250 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–168: USAR Command and Control—SW.250 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–222: Fort Mcpherson, GA ................. 9,921 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–223: Fort Monmouth, NJ ................. 21,908 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–242: RC Transformation in NY ....... 259 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–36: Red River Army Depot ............... 1,207 0 

BRAC 05 Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

USA–63: U.S. Army Garrison (Selfridge) 1,609 0 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 2005 258,776 0 

Worldwide Unspecified 

BRAC IV Base Realignment 

& Closure 

Base Realignment & Closure .................... 0 0 

BRAC IV Base Realignment 

& Closure, Air 

Force 

Base Realignment & Closure .................... 123,476 123,476 

BRAC IV Base Realignment 

& Closure, 

Army 

Base Realignment & Closure .................... 70,716 70,716 

BRAC IV Base Realignment 

& Closure, Navy 

Base Realignment & Closure .................... 129,351 129,351 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 1990 323,543 323,543 

Unspecified 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings-Air Force .................... 0 –32,000 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings-Defense-Wide ............. 0 –131,400 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings-Navy ........................... 0 –25,000 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings-Army .......................... 0 –100,000 

Total Prior Year Savings 0 –288,400 

Total Division B 14,766,047 13,069,438 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
523 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title Budget Request 

Conference 

Agreement 

Grand Total 14,766,047 13,069,438 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies 

Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE .............. 6,187 0 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES ........................................... 7,629,716 7,274,329 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ...... 2,549,492 2,333,303 

NAVAL REACTORS ................................................... 1,153,662 1,080,000 

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR ...................... 450,060 382,700 

Total, National nuclear security administration ... 11,782,930 11,070,332 

Environmental and other defense activities: 

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ............ 5,406,781 5,023,000 

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ............................. 859,952 823,364 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL ............ 0 0 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities .... 6,266,733 5,846,364 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ........................... 18,049,663 16,916,696 

Total, Discretionary Funding ............................................................ 18,055,850 16,916,696 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration ........................... 6,187 0 

Weapons Activities 

Directed stockpile work 

Life extension programs 

B61 Life extension program ............................................... 223,562 223,562 

W76 Life extension program .............................................. 257,035 257,035 

Total, Life extension programs ........................................... 480,597 480,597 

Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems ........................................................ 72,396 72,396 

W76 Stockpile systems ....................................................... 63,383 63,383 

W78 Stockpile systems ....................................................... 109,518 99,518 

W80 Stockpile systems ....................................................... 44,444 44,444 

B83 Stockpile systems ........................................................ 48,215 48,215 

W87 Stockpile systems ....................................................... 83,943 83,943 

W88 Stockpile systems ....................................................... 75,728 75,728 

Total, Stockpile systems ........................................................ 497,627 487,627 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
524 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Weapons dismantlement and disposition 

Operations and maintenance ............................................. 56,770 56,770 

Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition ............. 56,770 56,770 

Stockpile services 

Production support ............................................................. 354,502 330,000 

Research and development support ................................... 30,264 30,264 

R&D certification and safety ............................................. 190,892 165,569 

Management, technology, and production ........................ 198,700 188,700 

Plutonium sustainment ...................................................... 154,231 140,000 

Total, Stockpile services ....................................................... 928,589 854,533 

Total, Directed stockpile work ................................................... 1,963,583 1,879,527 

Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification ........................................................ 94,929 40,000 

Primary assessment technologies ...................................... 86,055 86,055 

Dynamic materials properties ........................................... 111,836 96,984 

Advanced radiography ....................................................... 27,058 26,000 

Secondary assessment technologies ................................... 86,061 85,000 

Total, Science campaign ...................................................... 405,939 334,039 

Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ................................................................. 41,696 41,696 

Weapon systems engineering assessment technology ....... 15,663 15,663 

Nuclear survivability ......................................................... 19,545 19,545 

Enhanced surveillance ....................................................... 66,174 66,174 

Total, Engineering campaign ............................................. 143,078 143,078 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield 

campaign 

Ignition ............................................................................... 109,888 109,888 

Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support .......... 86,259 86,259 

Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion ........................ 4,997 4,997 

Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas .................................................................................. 9,100 9,100 

Facility operations and target production ........................ 266,030 266,030 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield 

campaign .............................................................................. 476,274 476,274 

Advanced simulation and computing campaign ........... 628,945 620,000 

Readiness Campaign 

Nonnuclear readiness ......................................................... 65,000 65,000 

Tritium readiness ............................................................... 77,491 63,591 

Total, Readiness campaign ................................................. 142,491 128,591 

Total, Campaigns .......................................................................... 1,796,727 1,701,982 

Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) 

Operations of facilities 

Kansas City Plant .............................................................. 156,217 156,217 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ....................... 83,990 83,990 

Los Alamos National Laboratory ...................................... 318,526 318,526 

Nevada Test Site ................................................................ 97,559 97,559 

Pantex ................................................................................. 164,848 164,848 

Sandia National Laboratory ............................................. 120,708 120,708 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
525 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Savannah River Site .......................................................... 97,767 97,767 

Y–12 National security complex ........................................ 246,001 246,001 

Institutional site support ................................................... 199,638 0 

Total, Operations of facilities ............................................. 1,485,254 1,285,616 

Program readiness ..................................................................... 74,180 74,180 

Material recycle and recovery ................................................... 85,939 78,000 

Containers .................................................................................. 28,979 28,979 

Storage ....................................................................................... 31,272 31,272 

Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities ........... 1,705,624 1,498,047 

Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ............................. 9,881 9,881 

11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project, LANL ................ 19,402 10,000 

10-D–501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y–12 National security complex, Oakridge, TN .......................... 35,387 35,387 

09–D–404 Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM ......................... 25,168 25,168 

08–D–802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, 

Amerillo, TX .................................................................... 66,960 66,960 

07–D–140 Project engineering and design (PED) various 

locations .......................................................................... 3,518 3,518 

06–D–141 Project engineering & design (PED) Y–12 National Security Complex, Oakridge, TN ........................ 160,194 160,194 

04–D–125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los 

Alamos, NM .................................................................... 300,000 200,000 

Total, Construction ................................................................ 620,510 511,108 

Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities ................. 2,326,134 2,009,155 

Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment ........................................................ 149,274 145,274 

Program direction ...................................................................... 101,998 98,002 

Total, Secure transportation asset ........................................... 251,272 243,276 

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response .......................... 222,147 222,147 

Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program 

Operations and maintenance .................................................... 96,380 96,380 

Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program .............................................................................................. 96,380 96,380 

Site stewardship 

Operations and maintenance .................................................... 104,002 78,680 

Total, Site stewardship ................................................................ 104,002 78,680 

Safeguards and security 

Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance ............................................. 711,105 686,252 

Construction: 

08–D–701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project 

Los Alamos National Laboratory ........................... 11,752 11,752 

Total, Construction ........................................................ 11,752 11,752 

Total, Defense nuclear security .......................................... 722,857 698,004 

Cyber security ............................................................................ 126,614 126,614 

Total, Safeguards and security .................................................. 849,471 824,618 

National security applications .................................................. 20,000 10,000 

Subtotal, Weapons activities .............................................................. 7,629,716 7,065,765 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
526 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Legacy Contractor Pensions ....................................................... 0 168,232 

Recission .......................................................................................... 40,332 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ........................................................ 0 0 

Total, Weapons Activities ................................................................... 7,629,716 7,274,329 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Nonproliferation and verification R&D 

Operations and maintenance .................................................... 417,598 356,150 

Total, Operations and maintenance ................................. 417,598 356,150 

Total, Nonproliferation & verification R&D .......................... 417,598 356,150 

Nonproliferation and international security ......................... 161,833 155,305 

International nuclear materials protection and cooperation ................................................................................................ 571,639 571,639 

Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ........................................ 274,790 205,632 

U.S. uranium disposition ........................................... 26,435 26,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance .......................... 301,225 231,632 

Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC .................................................... 385,172 435,172 

99–D–141–01 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, Savannah River, SC ......................................... 176,000 0 

99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC .......................................................... 17,582 17,582 

Total, Construction ........................................................ 578,754 452,754 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition ............ 879,979 684,386 

Russian surplus materials disposition .................................... 10,174 1,000 

Total, Fissile materials disposition .......................................... 890,153 685,386 

Global threat reduction initiative .................................................... 508,269 500,000 

Legacy contractor pensions .............................................................. 0 55,823 

Recission ............................................................................................ 9,000 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ....................................... 2,549,492 2,333,303 

Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors development 

OHIO replacement reactor systems development .................. 0 121,300 

S8G Prototype refueling ............................................................... 0 99,500 

Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ...................... 0 358,300 

Operation and maintenance 

Operation and maintenance .............................................. 1,069,262 421,000 

Total, Operation and maintenance ................................... 1,069,262 1,000,100 

Construction: 

10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL ................................ 100 100 

10-D–904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho .............. 12,000 12,000 

08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID ................... 27,800 27,800 

Total, Construction ................................................................ 39,900 39,900 

Total, Naval reactors development ........................................... 1,109,162 460,900 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
527 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Program direction ............................................................................. 44,500 40,000 

Total, Naval Reactors .......................................................................... 1,153,662 1,080,000 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator ............................................................... 450,060 410,000 

Floor amendment 

Congressionally directed projects .................................................... 0 0 

Subtotal, Office of the Administrator .............................................. 450,060 410,000 

General Provision 

Section 309–Contractor Pay Freeze ................................................. 0 –27,300 

Security 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances ........................................................ 0 0 

Subtotal, Office of the Administrator .............................................. 450,060 382,700 

Transfer of prior year balances (OMB scoring) ....................... 0 0 

Total, Office Of The Administrator .................................................. 450,060 382,700 

Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ..................................................... 5,375 5,375 

Total, Closure sites ....................................................................... 5,375 5,375 

Hanford site: 

Central plateau remediation ..................................................... 0 546,890 

River corridor and other cleanup operations ........................... 0 386,822 

Nuclear facility D&D—remainder of Hanford ........................ 56,288 

Nuclear facility D&D river corridor closure project ................ 330,534 

Richland community and regulatory support ......................... 0 19,540 

Nuclear material stabilization and disposition PFP .............. 48,458 

SNF stabilization and disposition ........................................... 112,250 

Soil and water remediation—groundwater vadose zone ........ 222,285 

Solid waste stabilization and disposition 200 area ................ 143,897 

Total, Hanford site ........................................................................ 913,712 953,252 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ....................................... 0 382,769 

SNF stabilization and disposition—2012 ................................ 20,114 

Solid waste stabilization and disposition ................................ 165,035 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 110,169 

Soil and water remediation—2012 .......................................... 87,451 

Idaho community and regulatory support ............................... 0 4,100 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ............................................ 382,769 386,869 

NNSA sites 

NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ............................................. 0 282,393 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ............................... 873 

Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit .. 1,500 

Nevada ....................................................................................... 63,380 

Los Alamos National Laboratory ............................................. 357,939 

Sandia National Laboratory 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ................................... 423,692 282,393 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
528 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

Building 3019 ............................................................................ 0 37,000 

OR nuclear facility D&D .......................................................... 0 69,100 

Nuclear facility D & D ORNL .................................................. 44,000 

Nuclear facility D & D Y–12 .................................................... 30,000 

Nuclear facility D & D, E. Tennessee technology park ........... 100 

OR cleanup and disposition ..................................................... 0 87,000 

OR reservation community and regulatory support Soil and 

water remediation—offsites ................................................... 3,000 

OR reservation community and regulatory support Soil and 

water remediation—offsites ................................................... 0 6,409 

Solid waste stabilization and disposition—2012 .................... 99,000 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation .................................................... 176,100 199,509 

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

Waste treatment & immobilization plant 01–D–16 A–D 363,000 430,000 

Waste treatment & immobilization plant 01–D–16 E ...... 477,000 310,000 

Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant ........ 840,000 740,000 

Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ....... 521,391 445,000 

Total, Tank farm activities ................................................. 521,391 445,000 

Total, Office of River protection ................................................ 1,361,391 1,185,000 

Savannah River site: 

Savannah River community and regulatory support ............. 0 9,584 

Nuclear material stabilization and disposition ...................... 235,000 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 710,487 667,081 

SR site risk management operations ........................................ 0 343,586 

PE&D Glass Waste Storage Building #3 ................................. 0 3,500 

05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River .... 170,071 170,071 

Soil and water remediation ...................................................... 38,409 

SNF stabilization and disposition ........................................... 40,137 

Solid waste stabilization and disposition ................................ 30,040 

Total, Savannah River site ......................................................... 1,224,144 1,193,822 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ......................................................... 0 215,134 

Waste isolation pilot plant ........................................................ 147,136 

Central characterization project ............................................... 23,975 

Transportation ........................................................................... 29,044 

Community and regulatory support ......................................... 28,771 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ............................................. 228,926 215,134 

Program direction ............................................................................. 321,628 321,628 

Program Support .............................................................................. 0 20,380 

Community, regulatory and program support ................................ 91,279 

Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation .............................................................. 17,300 17,300 

Paducah ..................................................................................... 9,435 9,435 

Portsmouth ................................................................................. 16,412 16,412 

Richland/Hanford Site ............................................................. 69,234 69,234 

Savannah River Site ................................................................. 130,000 133,193 

Waste Isolation Pilot Project ..................................................... 4,845 4,845 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
529 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 

Request 

Conference 

Authorized 

West Valley ................................................................................. 1,600 1,600 

Total, Safeguards and Security ................................................. 248,826 252,019 

Technology development ................................................................... 32,320 11,000 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup ...................................... 5,410,162 5,026,381 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................ –3,381 –3,381 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup .......................................... 5,406,781 5,023,000 

Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security ....................................................... 349,445 335,436 

Program direction ...................................................................... 107,037 102,000 

Total, Health, safety and security ............................................. 456,482 437,436 

Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management .................................................................. 157,514 157,514 

Program direction ...................................................................... 12,586 12,086 

Total, Office of Legacy Management ........................................ 170,100 169,600 

Defense-related activities 

Infrastructure 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ........................... 98,500 93,350 

Total, Defense-related activities ................................................ 98,500 93,350 

Defense related administrative support .......................................... 118,836 118,836 

Acquisitions workforce improvement ............................................... 11,892 0 

Office of hearings and appeals ........................................................ 4,142 4,142 

Total, Other Defense Activities .......................................................... 859,952 823,364 

DIVISION E—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION 

TITLE L—SHORT TITLE; DEFINITIONS 

SEC. 5001. SHORT TITLE. 

This division may be cited as the ‘‘SBIR/STTR Reauthorization 

Act of 2011’’. 

SEC. 5002. DEFINITIONS. 

In this division— 

(1) the terms ‘‘Administration’’ and ‘‘Administrator’’ mean 

the Small Business Administration and the Administrator 

thereof, respectively; 

(2) the terms ‘‘extramural budget’’, ‘‘Federal agency’’, 

‘‘Small Business Innovation Research Program’’, ‘‘SBIR’’, 

‘‘Small Business Technology Transfer Program’’, and ‘‘STTR’’ 

have the meanings given such terms in section 9 of the Small 

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638); and 

(3) the term ‘‘small business concern’’ has the meaning 

given that term under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 632). 

TITLE LI—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION 

Subtitle A—Reauthorization of the SBIR and STTR Programs 

Sec. 5101. Extension of termination dates. 

Sec. 5102. SBIR and STTR allocation increase. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
530 

Sec. 5103. SBIR and STTR award levels. 

Sec. 5104. Agency and program flexibility. 

Sec. 5105. Elimination of Phase II invitations. 

Sec. 5106. Pilot to allow phase flexibility. 

Sec. 5107. Participation by firms with substantial investment from multiple venture 

capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms in a 

portion of the SBIR program. 

Sec. 5108. SBIR and STTR special acquisition preference. 

Sec. 5109. Collaborating with Federal laboratories and research and development 

centers. 

Sec. 5110. Notice requirement. 

Sec. 5111. Additional SBIR and STTR awards. 

Subtitle B—Outreach and Commercialization Initiatives 

Sec. 5121. Technical assistance for awardees. 

Sec. 5122. Commercialization Readiness Program at Department of Defense. 

Sec. 5123. Commercialization Readiness Pilot Program for civilian agencies. 

Sec. 5124. Interagency Policy Committee. 

Sec. 5125. Clarifying the definition of ‘‘Phase III’’. 

Sec. 5126. Shortened period for final decisions on proposals and applications. 

Sec. 5127. Phase 0 Proof of Concept Partnership pilot program. 

Subtitle C—Oversight and Evaluation 

Sec. 5131. Streamlining annual evaluation requirements. 

Sec. 5132. Data collection from agencies for SBIR. 

Sec. 5133. Data collection from agencies for STTR. 

Sec. 5134. Public database. 

Sec. 5135. Government database. 

Sec. 5136. Accuracy in funding base calculations. 

Sec. 5137. Continued evaluation by the National Academy of Sciences. 

Sec. 5138. Technology insertion reporting requirements. 

Sec. 5139. Intellectual property protections. 

Sec. 5140. Obtaining consent from SBIR and STTR applicants to release contact information to economic development organizations. 

Sec. 5141. Pilot to allow funding for administrative, oversight, and contract processing costs. 

Sec. 5142. GAO study with respect to venture capital operating company, hedge 

fund, and private equity firm involvement. 

Sec. 5143. Reducing vulnerability of SBIR and STTR programs to fraud, waste, and 

abuse. 

Sec. 5144. Simplified paperwork requirements. 

Subtitle D—Policy Directives 

Sec. 5151. Conforming amendments to the SBIR and the STTR Policy Directives. 

Subtitle E—Other Provisions 

Sec. 5161. Report on SBIR and STTR program goals. 

Sec. 5162. Competitive selection procedures for SBIR and STTR programs. 

Sec. 5163. Loan restrictions. 

Sec. 5164. Limitation on pilot programs. 

Sec. 5165. Commercialization success. 

Sec. 5166. Publication of certain information. 

Sec. 5167. Report on enhancement of manufacturing activities. 

Sec. 5168. Coordination of the SBIR program and the Experimental Program to 

Stimulate Competitive Research. 

Subtitle A—Reauthorization of the SBIR and STTR 

Programs 

SEC. 5101. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION DATES. 

(a) SBIR.—Section 9(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

638(m)) is amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

(b) STTR.—Section 9(n)(1)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(n)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 

‘‘2017’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
531 

SEC. 5102. SBIR AND STTR ALLOCATION INCREASE. 

(a) SBIR.—Section 9(f) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

638(f)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Each’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph 

(2)(B), each’’; 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

and 

(C) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(C) not less than 2.5 percent of such budget in each of 

fiscal years 1997 through 2011; 

‘‘(D) not less than 2.6 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2012; 

‘‘(E) not less than 2.7 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2013; 

‘‘(F) not less than 2.8 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2014; 

‘‘(G) not less than 2.9 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2015; 

‘‘(H) not less than 3.0 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2016; and 

‘‘(I) not less than 3.2 percent of such budget in fiscal 

year 2017 and each fiscal year thereafter,’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection 

may be construed to prohibit a Federal agency from expending 

with small business concerns an amount of the extramural 

budget for research or research and development of the agency 

that exceeds the amount required under paragraph (1).’’. 

(b) STTR.—Section 9(n)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(n)(1)(B)) is amended— 

(1) in clause (i) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; and 

(2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(ii) 0.3 percent for each of fiscal years 2004 

through 2011; 

‘‘(iii) 0.35 percent for each of fiscal years 2012 and 

2013; 

‘‘(iv) 0.40 percent for each of fiscal years 2014 and 

2015; and 

‘‘(v) 0.45 percent for fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter.’’. 

SEC. 5103. SBIR AND STTR AWARD LEVELS. 

(a) SBIR ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 9(j)(2)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(j)(2)(D)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘$750,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 

(b) STTR ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 9(p)(2)(B)(ix) of the Small 

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(p)(2)(B)(ix)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘$750,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 

(c) ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 9 of the Small Business 

Act (15 U.S.C. 638) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
532 

(1) in subsection (j)(2)(D), by striking ‘‘once every 5 years to 

reflect economic adjustments and programmatic considerations’’ 

and inserting ‘‘every year for inflation’’; and 

(2) in subsection (p)(2)(B)(ix), as amended by subsection (b) 

of this section, by inserting ‘‘(each of which the Administrator 

shall adjust for inflation annually)’’ after ‘‘$1,000,000,’’. 

(d) LIMITATION ON SIZE OF AWARDS.—Section 9 of the Small 

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further 

amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(aa) LIMITATION ON SIZE OF AWARDS.— 

‘‘(1) LIMITATION.—No Federal agency may issue an award 

under the SBIR program or the STTR program if the size of the 

award exceeds the award guidelines established under this section by more than 50 percent. 

‘‘(2) MAINTENANCE OF INFORMATION.—Participating agencies shall maintain information on awards exceeding the guidelines established under this section, including— 

‘‘(A) the amount of each award; 

‘‘(B) a justification for exceeding the guidelines for each 

award; 

‘‘(C) the identity and location of each award recipient; 

and 

‘‘(D) whether an award recipient has received any venture capital, hedge fund, or private equity firm investment 

and, if so, whether the recipient is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or 

private equity firms. 

‘‘(3) REPORTS.—The Administrator shall include the information described in paragraph (2) in the annual report of the 

Administrator to Congress. 

‘‘(4) WAIVER FOR SPECIFIC TOPIC.—Upon the receipt of an 

application from a Federal agency, the Administrator may 

grant a waiver from the requirement under paragraph (1) with 

respect to a specific topic (but not for the agency as a whole) for 

a fiscal year if the Administrator determines, based on the information contained in the application from the agency, that— 

‘‘(A) the requirement under paragraph (1) will interfere 

with the ability of the agency to fulfill its research mission 

through the SBIR program or the STTR program; and 

‘‘(B) the agency will minimize, to the maximum extent 

possible, the number of awards that do not satisfy the requirement under paragraph (1) to preserve the nature and 

intent of the SBIR program and the STTR program. 

‘‘(5) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection 

shall be construed to prevent a Federal agency from 

supplementing an award under the SBIR program or the STTR 

program using funds of the Federal agency that are not part of 

the SBIR program or the STTR program of the Federal agency.’’. 

SEC. 5104. AGENCY AND PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(bb) SUBSEQUENT PHASE II AWARDS.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
533 

‘‘(1) AGENCY FLEXIBILITY.—A small business concern that 

received a Phase I award from a Federal agency under this section shall be eligible to receive a subsequent Phase II award 

from another Federal agency, if the head of each relevant Federal agency or the relevant component of the Federal agency 

makes a written determination that the topics of the relevant 

awards are the same and both agencies report the awards to the 

Administrator for inclusion in the public database under subsection (k). 

‘‘(2) SBIR AND STTR PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY.—A small business concern that received a Phase I award under this section 

under the SBIR program or the STTR program may receive a 

subsequent Phase II award in either the SBIR program or the 

STTR program and the participating agency or agencies shall 

report the awards to the Administrator for inclusion in the public database under subsection (k). 

‘‘(3) PREVENTING DUPLICATIVE AWARDS.—The head of a 

Federal agency shall verify that any activity to be performed 

with respect to a project with a Phase I or Phase II SBIR or 

STTR award has not been funded under the SBIR program or 

STTR program of another Federal agency.’’. 

SEC. 5105. ELIMINATION OF PHASE II INVITATIONS. 

Section 9(e) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ‘‘to further’’ and inserting ‘‘which shall not include any invitation, pre-screening, or 

pre-selection process for eligibility for Phase II, that will further’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (6)(B), by striking ‘‘to further develop proposed ideas to’’ and inserting ‘‘which shall not include any invitation, pre-screening, or pre-selection process for eligibility for 

Phase II, that will further develop proposals that’’. 

SEC. 5106. PILOT TO ALLOW PHASE FLEXIBILITY. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(cc) PHASE FLEXIBILITY.—During fiscal years 2012 through 

2017, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, 

and the Department of Education may each provide to a small business concern an award under Phase II of the SBIR program with 

respect to a project, without regard to whether the small business 

concern was provided an award under Phase I of an SBIR program 

with respect to such project, if the head of the applicable agency determines that the small business concern has completed the determinations described in subsection (e)(4)(A) with respect to such 

project despite not having been provided a Phase I award.’’. 

SEC. 5107. PARTICIPATION BY FIRMS WITH SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT 

FROM MULTIPLE VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANIES, HEDGE FUNDS, OR PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS IN A 

PORTION OF THE SBIR PROGRAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding 

at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
534 

‘‘(dd) PARTICIPATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS MAJORITY- OWNED BY VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANIES, HEDGE

FUNDS, OR PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS IN THE SBIR PROGRAM.— ‘‘(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon providing a written determination 

described in paragraph (2) to the Administrator, the Committee 

on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate, and the 

Committee on Small Business and the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, not 

later than 30 days before the date on which any such award is 

made— 

‘‘(A) the Director of the National Institutes of Health, 

the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of the National 

Science Foundation may award not more than 25 percent 

of the funds allocated for the SBIR program of the applicable Federal agency to small business concerns that are 

owned in majority part by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms 

through competitive, merit-based procedures that are open 

to all eligible small business concerns; and 

‘‘(B) the head of a Federal agency other than a Federal 

agency described in subparagraph (A) that participates in 

the SBIR program may award not more than 15 percent of 

the funds allocated for the SBIR program of the Federal 

agency to small business concerns that are owned in majority part by multiple venture capital operating companies, 

hedge funds, or private equity firms through competitive, 

merit-based procedures that are open to all eligible small 

business concerns. 

‘‘(2) DETERMINATION.—A written determination described 

in this paragraph is a written determination by the head of a 

Federal agency that explains how the use of the authority under 

paragraph (1) will— 

‘‘(A) induce additional venture capital, hedge fund, or 

private equity firm funding of small business innovations; 

‘‘(B) substantially contribute to the mission of the Federal agency; 

‘‘(C) demonstrate a need for public research; and 

‘‘(D) otherwise fulfill the capital needs of small business concerns for additional financing for SBIR projects. 

‘‘(3) REGISTRATION.—A small business concern that is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, 

hedge funds, or private equity firms and qualified for participation in the program authorized under paragraph (1) shall— 

‘‘(A) register with the Administrator on the date that 

the small business concern submits an application for an 

award under the SBIR program; and 

‘‘(B) indicate in any SBIR proposal that the small business concern is registered under subparagraph (A) as majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms. 

‘‘(4) COMPLIANCE.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The head of a Federal agency that 

makes an award under this subsection during a fiscal year 

shall collect and submit to the Administrator data relating 

to the number and dollar amount of Phase I awards, Phase 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
535 

II awards, and any other category of awards by the Federal 

agency under the SBIR program during that fiscal year. 

‘‘(B) ANNUAL REPORTING.—The Administrator shall include as part of each annual report by the Administration 

under subsection (b)(7) any data submitted under subparagraph (A) and a discussion of the compliance of each Federal agency that makes an award under this subsection 

during the fiscal year with the maximum percentages 

under paragraph (1). 

‘‘(5) ENFORCEMENT.—If a Federal agency awards more 

than the percent of the funds allocated for the SBIR program 

of the Federal agency authorized under paragraph (1) for a purpose described in paragraph (1), the head of the Federal agency 

shall transfer an amount equal to the amount awarded in excess of the amount authorized under paragraph (1) to the funds 

for general SBIR programs from the non-SBIR and non-STTR 

research and development funds of the Federal agency not later 

than 180 days after the date on which the Federal agency made 

the award that caused the total awarded under paragraph (1) 

to be more than the amount authorized under paragraph (1) for 

a purpose described in paragraph (1). 

‘‘(6) FINAL DECISIONS ON APPLICATIONS UNDER THE SBIR

PROGRAM.— 

‘‘(A) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term ‘covered 

small business concern’ means a small business concern 

that— 

‘‘(i) was not majority-owned by multiple venture 

capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private 

equity firms on the date on which the small business 

concern submitted an application in response to a solicitation under the SBIR programs; and 

‘‘(ii) on the date of the award under the SBIR program is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity 

firms. 

‘‘(B) IN GENERAL.—If a Federal agency does not make 

an award under a solicitation under the SBIR program before the date that is 9 months after the date on which the 

period for submitting applications under the solicitation 

ends— 

‘‘(i) a covered small business concern is eligible to 

receive the award, without regard to whether the covered small business concern meets the requirements for 

receiving an award under the SBIR program for a 

small business concern that is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, 

or private equity firms, if the covered small business 

concern meets all other requirements for such an 

award; and 

‘‘(ii) the head of the Federal agency shall transfer 

an amount equal to any amount awarded to a covered 

small business concern under the solicitation to the 

funds for general SBIR programs from the non-SBIR 

and non-STTR research and development funds of the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
536 

Federal agency, not later than 90 days after the date 

on which the Federal agency makes the award. 

‘‘(7) EVALUATION CRITERIA.—A Federal agency may not use 

investment of venture capital or investment from hedge funds or 

private equity firms as a criterion for the award of contracts 

under the SBIR program or STTR program.’’. 

(b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(aa) VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANY.—In this Act, the 

term ‘venture capital operating company’ means an entity described 

in clause (i), (v), or (vi) of section 121.103(b)(5) of title 13, Code of 

Federal Regulations (or any successor thereto). 

‘‘(bb) HEDGE FUND.—In this Act, the term ‘hedge fund’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 13(h)(2) of the Bank Holding 

Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(2)). 

‘‘(cc) PRIVATE EQUITY FIRM.—In this Act, the term ‘private equity firm’ has the meaning given the term ‘private equity fund’ in 

section 13(h)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 

U.S.C. 1851(h)(2)).’’. 

(c) RULEMAKING TO ENSURE THAT FIRMS THAT ARE MAJORITYOWNED BY MULTIPLE VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANIES, 

HEDGE FUNDS, OR PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS ARE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN A PORTION OF THE SBIR PROGRAM.— 

(1) STATEMENT OF CONGRESSIONAL INTENT.—It is the stated intent of Congress that the Administrator should promulgate 

regulations to carry out the authority under section 9(dd) of the 

Small Business Act, as added by this section, that— 

(A) permit small business concerns that are majorityowned by multiple venture capital operating companies, 

hedge funds, or private equity firms to participate in the 

SBIR program in accordance with section 9(dd) of the 

Small Business Act; 

(B) provide specific guidance for small business concerns that are majority-owned by multiple venture capital 

operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms 

with regard to eligibility, participation, and affiliation 

rules; and 

(C) preserve and maintain the integrity of the SBIR 

program as a program for small business concerns in the 

United States by prohibiting large businesses or large entities or foreign-owned businesses or foreign-owned entities 

from participation in the program established under section 

9 of the Small Business Act. 

(2) RULEMAKING REQUIRED.— 

(A) PROPOSED REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

shall issue proposed regulations to amend section 121.103 

(relating to determinations of affiliation applicable to the 

SBIR program) and section 121.702 (relating to ownership 

and control standards and size standards applicable to the 

SBIR program) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, for 

firms that are majority-owned by multiple venture capital 

operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms 

and participating in the SBIR program solely under the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
537 

authority under section 9(dd) of the Small Business Act, as 

added by this section. 

(B) FINAL REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after 

the date of enactment of this Act, and after providing notice 

of and opportunity for comment on the proposed regulations issued under subparagraph (A), the Administrator 

shall issue final or interim final regulations under this 

subsection. 

(3) CONTENTS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The regulations issued under this 

subsection shall permit the participation of applicants majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms in the SBIR program in accordance with section 9(dd) of the Small Business Act, as added by this section, unless the Administrator 

determines— 

(i) in accordance with the size standards established under subparagraph (B), that the applicant is— 

(I) a large business or large entity; or 

(II) majority-owned or controlled by a large 

business or large entity; or 

(ii) in accordance with the criteria established 

under subparagraph (C), that the applicant— 

(I) is a foreign-owned business or a foreign entity or is not a citizen of the United States or alien 

lawfully admitted for permanent residence; or 

(II) is majority-owned or controlled by a foreign-owned business, foreign entity, or person who 

is not a citizen of the United States or alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. 

(B) SIZE STANDARDS.—Under the authority to establish 

size standards under paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 3(a) 

of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)), the Administrator shall, in accordance with paragraph (1) of this subsection, establish size standards for applicants seeking to 

participate in the SBIR program solely under the authority 

under section 9(dd) of the Small Business Act, as added by 

this section. 

(C) CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING FOREIGN OWNERSHIP.— The Administrator shall establish criteria for determining 

whether an applicant meets the requirements under subparagraph (A)(ii), and, in establishing the criteria, shall 

consider whether the criteria should include— 

(i) whether the applicant is at least 51 percent 

owned or controlled by citizens of the United States or 

domestic venture capital operating companies, hedge 

funds, or private equity firms; 

(ii) whether the applicant is domiciled in the 

United States; and 

(iii) whether the applicant is a direct or indirect 

subsidiary of a foreign-owned firm, including whether 

the criteria should include that an applicant is a direct 

or indirect subsidiary of a foreign-owned entity if— 

(I) any venture capital operating company, 

hedge fund, or private equity firm that owns more 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
538 

than 20 percent of the applicant is a direct or indirect subsidiary of a foreign-owned entity; or 

(II) in the aggregate, entities that are direct or 

indirect subsidiaries of foreign-owned entities own 

more than 49 percent of the applicant. 

(D) CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING AFFILIATION.—The Administrator shall establish criteria, in accordance with 

paragraph (1), for determining whether an applicant is affiliated with a venture capital operating company, hedge 

fund, private equity firm, or any other business that the 

venture capital operating company, hedge fund, or private 

equity firm has financed and, in establishing the criteria, 

shall specify that— 

(i) if a venture capital operating company, hedge 

fund, or private equity firm that is determined to be affiliated with an applicant is a minority investor in the 

applicant, the portfolio companies of the venture capital operating company, hedge fund, or private equity 

firm shall not be determined to be affiliated with the 

applicant, unless— 

(I) the venture capital operating company, 

hedge fund, or private equity firm owns a majority 

of the portfolio company; or 

(II) the venture capital operating company, 

hedge fund, or private equity firm holds a majority 

of the seats on the board of directors of the portfolio company; 

(ii) subject to clause (i), the Administrator retains 

the authority to determine whether a venture capital 

operating company, hedge fund, or private equity firm 

is affiliated with an applicant, including establishing 

other criteria; 

(iii) the Administrator may not determine that a 

portfolio company of a venture capital operating company, hedge fund, or private equity firm is affiliated 

with an applicant based solely on 1 or more shared investors; and 

(iv) subject to clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), the Administrator retains the authority to determine whether a 

portfolio company of a venture capital operating company, hedge fund, or private equity firm is affiliated 

with an applicant based on factors independent of 

whether there is a shared investor, such as whether 

there are contractual obligations between the portfolio 

company and the applicant. 

(4) ENFORCEMENT.—If the Administrator does not issue 

final or interim final regulations under this subsection on or before the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Administrator may not carry out or establish any pilot 

program until the date on which the Administrator issues the 

final or interim final regulations under this subsection. 

(5) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the terms ‘‘venture capital operating company’’, ‘‘hedge fund’’, and ‘‘private equity 

firm’’ have the same meaning as in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632), as amended by this section. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
539 

(d) ASSISTANCE FOR DETERMINING AFFILIATES.— 

(1) CLEAR EXPLANATION REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall 

post on the Web site of the Administration (with a direct link 

displayed on the homepage of the Web site of the Administration or the SBIR and STTR Web sites of the Administration)— 

(A) a clear explanation of the SBIR and STTR affiliation rules under part 121 of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations; and 

(B) contact information for officers or employees of the 

Administration who— 

(i) upon request, shall review an issue relating to 

the rules described in subparagraph (A); and 

(ii) shall respond to a request under clause (i) not 

later than 20 business days after the date on which the 

request is received. 

(2) INCLUSION OF AFFILIATION RULES FOR CERTAIN SMALL

BUSINESS CONCERNS.—On and after the date on which the final 

regulations under subsection (c) are issued, the Administrator 

shall post on the Web site of the Administration information relating to the regulations, in accordance with paragraph (1). 

SEC. 5108. SBIR AND STTR SPECIAL ACQUISITION PREFERENCE. 

Section 9(r) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(r)) is 

amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(4) PHASE III AWARDS.—To the greatest extent practicable, 

Federal agencies and Federal prime contractors shall issue 

Phase III awards relating to technology, including sole source 

awards, to the SBIR and STTR award recipients that developed the technology.’’. 

SEC. 5109. COLLABORATING WITH FEDERAL LABORATORIES AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ee) COLLABORATING WITH FEDERAL LABORATORIES AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.— 

‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION.—Subject to the limitations under this 

section, the head of each participating Federal agency may 

make SBIR and STTR awards to any eligible small business 

concern that— 

‘‘(A) intends to enter into an agreement with a Federal 

laboratory or federally funded research and development 

center for portions of the activities to be performed under 

that award; or 

‘‘(B) has entered into a cooperative research and development agreement (as defined in section 12(d) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 

U.S.C. 3710a(d))) with a Federal laboratory. 

‘‘(2) PROHIBITION.—No Federal agency shall— 

‘‘(A) condition an SBIR or STTR award upon entering 

into agreement with any Federal laboratory or any federally funded laboratory or research and development center 

for any portion of the activities to be performed under that 

award; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
540 

‘‘(B) approve an agreement between a small business 

concern receiving an SBIR or STTR award and a Federal 

laboratory or federally funded laboratory or research and 

development center, if the small business concern performs 

a lesser portion of the activities to be performed under that 

award than required by this section and by the SBIR Policy Directive and the STTR Policy Directive of the Administrator; or 

‘‘(C) approve an agreement that violates any provision, 

including any data rights protections provision, of this section or the SBIR and the STTR Policy Directives. 

‘‘(3) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall 

modify the SBIR Policy Directive and the STTR Policy Directive 

issued under this section to ensure that small business concerns— 

‘‘(A) have the flexibility to use the resources of the Federal laboratories or federally funded research and development centers; and 

‘‘(B) are not mandated to enter into agreement with any 

Federal laboratory or any federally funded laboratory or research and development center as a condition of an award. 

‘‘(4) ADVANCE PAYMENT.—If a small business concern receiving an award under this section enters into an agreement 

with a Federal laboratory or federally funded research and development center for portions of the activities to be performed 

under that award, the Federal laboratory or federally funded 

research and development center may not require advance payment from the small business concern in an amount greater 

than the amount necessary to pay for 30 days of such activities.’’. 

SEC. 5110. NOTICE REQUIREMENT. 

(a) SBIR PROGRAM.—Section 9(g) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(g)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (11), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(12) provide timely notice to the Administrator of any case 

or controversy before any Federal judicial or administrative tribunal concerning the SBIR program of the Federal agency.’’. 

(b) STTR PROGRAM.—Section 9(o) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(o)) is amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (15); 

(2) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

(3) by redesignating paragraph (16) as paragraph (15); and 

(4) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(16) provide timely notice to the Administrator of any case 

or controversy before any Federal judicial or administrative tribunal concerning the STTR program of the Federal agency.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
541 

SEC. 5111. ADDITIONAL SBIR AND STTR AWARDS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ff) ADDITIONAL SBIR AND STTR AWARDS.— ‘‘(1) EXPRESS AUTHORITY FOR AWARDING A SEQUENTIAL

PHASE II AWARD.—A small business concern that receives a 

Phase II SBIR award or a Phase II STTR award for a project 

remains eligible to receive 1 additional Phase II SBIR award 

or Phase II STTR award for continued work on that project. 

‘‘(2) PREVENTING DUPLICATIVE AWARDS.—The head of a 

Federal agency shall verify that any activity to be performed 

with respect to a project with a Phase I or Phase II SBIR or 

STTR award has not been funded under the SBIR program or 

STTR program of another Federal agency.’’. 

Subtitle B—Outreach and Commercialization Initiatives 

SEC. 5121. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR AWARDEES. 

Section 9(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(q)) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or STTR program’’ after ‘‘SBIR program’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘SBIR projects’’ and inserting ‘‘SBIR or 

STTR projects’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting ‘‘5 

years’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) PHASE I.—A Federal agency described in paragraph (1) may— 

‘‘(i) provide to the recipient of a Phase I SBIR or 

STTR award, through a vendor selected under paragraph (2), the services described in paragraph (1), in 

an amount equal to not more than $5,000 per year; or 

‘‘(ii) authorize the recipient of a Phase I SBIR or 

STTR award to purchase the services described in 

paragraph (1), in an amount equal to not more than 

$5,000 per year, which shall be in addition to the 

amount of the recipient’s award.’’; 

(B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(B) PHASE II.—A Federal agency described in paragraph (1) may— 

‘‘(i) provide to the recipient of a Phase II SBIR or 

STTR award, through a vendor selected under paragraph (2), the services described in paragraph (1), in 

an amount equal to not more than $5,000 per year; or 

‘‘(ii) authorize the recipient of a Phase II SBIR or 

STTR award to purchase the services described in 

paragraph (1), in an amount equal to not more than 

$5,000 per year, which shall be in addition to the 

amount of the recipient’s award.’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
542 

‘‘(C) FLEXIBILITY.—In carrying out subparagraphs (A) 

and (B), each Federal agency shall provide the allowable 

amounts to a recipient that meets the eligibility requirements under the applicable subparagraph, if the recipient 

requests to seek technical assistance from an individual or 

entity other than the vendor selected under paragraph (2) 

by the Federal agency. 

‘‘(D) LIMITATION.—A Federal agency may not— 

‘‘(i) use the amounts authorized under subparagraph (A) or (B) unless the vendor selected under paragraph (2) provides the technical assistance to the recipient; or 

‘‘(ii) enter a contract with a vendor under paragraph (2) under which the amount provided for technical assistance is based on total number of Phase I or 

Phase II awards.’’. 

SEC. 5122. COMMERCIALIZATION READINESS PROGRAM AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9(y) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(y)) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘PILOT’’ and inserting ‘‘READINESS’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘Pilot’’ each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘Readiness’’; 

(3) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or Small Business Technology Transfer Program’’ after ‘‘Small Business Innovation Research 

Program’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The authority 

to create and administer a Commercialization Readiness 

Program under this subsection may not be construed to 

eliminate or replace any other SBIR program or STTR program that enhances the insertion or transition of SBIR or 

STTR technologies, including any such program in effect 

on the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 

Stat. 3136).’’; 

(4) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or Small Business Technology Transfer Program’’ after ‘‘Small Business Innovation Research Program’’; 

(5) by striking paragraph (5); 

(6) by striking paragraph (6); and 

(7) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following: 

‘‘(5) INSERTION INCENTIVES.—For any contract with a value 

of not less than $100,000,000, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to— 

‘‘(A) establish goals for the transition of Phase III technologies in subcontracting plans; and 

‘‘(B) require a prime contractor on such a contract to 

report the number and dollar amount of contracts entered 

into by that prime contractor for Phase III SBIR or STTR 

projects. 

‘‘(6) GOAL FOR SBIR AND STTR TECHNOLOGY INSERTION.— 

The Secretary of Defense shall— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
543 

‘‘(A) set a goal to increase the number of Phase II SBIR 

contracts and the number of Phase II STTR contracts 

awarded by the Secretary that lead to technology transition 

into programs of record or fielded systems; 

‘‘(B) use incentives in effect on the date of enactment of 

the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011, or create new 

incentives, to encourage agency program managers and 

prime contractors to meet the goal under subparagraph (A); 

and 

‘‘(C) submit to the Administrator for inclusion in the 

annual report under subsection (b)(7)— 

‘‘(i) the number and percentage of Phase II SBIR 

and STTR contracts awarded by the Secretary that led 

to technology transition into programs of record or 

fielded systems; 

‘‘(ii) information on the status of each project that 

received funding through the Commercialization Readiness Program and efforts to transition those projects 

into programs of record or fielded systems; and 

‘‘(iii) a description of each incentive that has been 

used by the Secretary under subparagraph (B) and the 

effectiveness of that incentive with respect to meeting 

the goal under subparagraph (A).’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 9(i)(1) 

of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(i)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(including awards under subsection (y))’’ after ‘‘the number 

of awards’’. 

SEC. 5123. COMMERCIALIZATION READINESS PILOT PROGRAM FOR CIVILIAN AGENCIES. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(gg) PILOT PROGRAM.— ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION.—The head of each covered Federal 

agency may allocate not more than 10 percent of the funds allocated to the SBIR program and the STTR program of the covered Federal agency— 

‘‘(A) for awards for technology development, testing, 

evaluation, and commercialization assistance for SBIR and 

STTR Phase II technologies; or 

‘‘(B) to support the progress of research, research and 

development, and commercialization conducted under the 

SBIR or STTR programs to Phase III. 

‘‘(2) APPLICATION BY FEDERAL AGENCY.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A covered Federal agency may not 

establish a pilot program unless the covered Federal agency 

makes a written application to the Administrator, not later 

than 90 days before the first day of the fiscal year in which 

the pilot program is to be established, that describes a compelling reason that additional investment in SBIR or STTR 

technologies is necessary, including unusually high regulatory, systems integration, or other costs relating to development or manufacturing of identifiable, highly promising 

small business technologies or a class of such technologies 

expected to substantially advance the mission of the agency. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
544 

‘‘(B) DETERMINATION.—The Administrator shall— 

‘‘(i) make a determination regarding an application submitted under subparagraph (A) not later than 

30 days before the first day of the fiscal year for which 

the application is submitted; 

‘‘(ii) publish the determination in the Federal Register; and 

‘‘(iii) make a copy of the determination and any related materials available to the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the 

Committee on Small Business and the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(3) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF AWARD.—The head of a covered 

Federal agency may not make an award under a pilot program 

in excess of 3 times the dollar amounts generally established for 

Phase II awards under subsection (j)(2)(D) or (p)(2)(B)(ix). 

‘‘(4) REGISTRATION.—Any applicant that receives an award 

under a pilot program shall register with the Administrator in 

a registry that is available to the public. 

‘‘(5) AWARD CRITERIA OR CONSIDERATION.—When making 

an award under this section, the head of a covered Federal 

agency shall give consideration to whether the technology to be 

supported by the award is likely to be manufactured in the 

United States. 

‘‘(6) REPORT.—The head of each covered Federal agency 

shall include in the annual report of the covered Federal agency 

to the Administrator an analysis of the various activities considered for inclusion in the pilot program of the covered Federal 

agency and a statement of the reasons why each activity considered was included or not included, as the case may be. 

‘‘(7) TERMINATION.—The authority to establish a pilot program under this section expires at the end of fiscal year 2017. 

‘‘(8) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

‘‘(A) the term ‘covered Federal agency’— 

‘‘(i) means a Federal agency participating in the 

SBIR program or the STTR program; and 

‘‘(ii) does not include the Department of Defense; 

and 

‘‘(B) the term ‘pilot program’ means each program established under paragraph (1).’’. 

SEC. 5124. INTERAGENCY POLICY COMMITTEE. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Director of the Office of Science and 

Technology Policy shall establish an Interagency SBIR/STTR Policy Committee. 

(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The Interagency SBIR/STTR Policy Committee shall include representatives from Federal agencies with an 

SBIR or an STTR program and the Small Business Administration. 

(c) DUTIES.—The Interagency SBIR/STTR Policy Committee 

shall review the following issues and make policy recommendations 

on ways to improve program effectiveness and efficiency: 

(1) The public and Government databases described in section 9(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(k)). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
545 

(2) Federal agency flexibility in establishing Phase I and II 

award sizes, including appropriate criteria for exercising such 

flexibility. 

(3) Commercialization assistance best practices of Federal 

agencies with significant potential to be employed by other 

agencies and the appropriate steps to achieve that leverage, as 

well as proposals for new initiatives to address funding gaps 

that business concerns face after Phase II but before commercialization. 

(4) Developing and incorporating a standard evaluation 

framework to enable systematic assessment of SBIR and STTR, 

including through improved tracking of awards and outcomes 

and development of performance measures for the SBIR program and STTR program of each Federal agency. 

(5) Outreach and technical assistance activities that increase the participation of small businesses underrepresented in 

the SBIR and STTR programs, including the identification and 

sharing of best practices and the leveraging of resources in support of such activities across agencies. 

(d) REPORTS.—The Interagency SBIR/STTR Policy Committee 

shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate— 

(1) a report on its review and recommendations under subsection (c)(1) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

of this Act; 

(2) a report on its review and recommendations under subsection (c)(2) not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act; 

(3) a report on its review and recommendations under subsection (c)(3) not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act; 

(4) a report on its review and recommendations under subsection (c)(4) not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act; and 

(5) a report on its review and recommendations under subsection (c)(5) not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

SEC. 5125. CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION OF ‘‘PHASE III’’. 

(a) PHASE III AWARDS.—Section 9(e) of the Small Business Act 

(15 U.S.C. 638(e)), as amended by this title, is further amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4)(C), in the matter preceding clause (i), 

by inserting ‘‘for work that derives from, extends, or completes 

efforts made under prior funding agreements under the SBIR 

program’’ after ‘‘phase’’; 

(2) in paragraph (6)(C), in the matter preceding clause (i), 

by inserting ‘‘for work that derives from, extends, or completes 

efforts made under prior funding agreements under the STTR 

program’’ after ‘‘phase’’; 

(3) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(4) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting a semicolon; and 

(5) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(10) the term ‘commercialization’ means— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
546 

‘‘(A) the process of developing products, processes, technologies, or services; and 

‘‘(B) the production and delivery (whether by the originating party or by others) of products, processes, technologies, or services for sale to or use by the Federal Government or commercial markets;’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 9 of 

the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, 

is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (e)— 

(A) in paragraph (4)(C)(ii), by striking ‘‘scientific review criteria’’ and inserting ‘‘merit-based selection procedures’’; 

(B) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘the second or the 

third phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II or Phase III’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(11) the term ‘Phase I’ means— 

‘‘(A) with respect to the SBIR program, the first phase 

described in paragraph (4)(A); and 

‘‘(B) with respect to the STTR program, the first phase 

described in paragraph (6)(A); 

‘‘(12) the term ‘Phase II’ means— 

‘‘(A) with respect to the SBIR program, the second 

phase described in paragraph (4)(B); and 

‘‘(B) with respect to the STTR program, the second 

phase described in paragraph (6)(B); and 

‘‘(13) the term ‘Phase III’ means— 

‘‘(A) with respect to the SBIR program, the third phase 

described in paragraph (4)(C); and 

‘‘(B) with respect to the STTR program, the third phase 

described in paragraph (6)(C).’’; 

(2) in subsection (j)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘phase two’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) in subparagraph (B)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the third phase’’ each place it 

appears and inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

(ii) in subparagraph (D)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase I’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

(iii) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘the third 

phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; 

(iv) in subparagraph (G)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase I’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(v) in subparagraph (H)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase I’’; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
547 

(II) by striking ‘‘second phase’’ each place it 

appears and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(III) by striking ‘‘third phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (3)— 

(i) in subparagraph (A)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the first phase (as described in 

subsection (e)(4)(A))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase I’’; 

(II) by striking ‘‘the second phase (as described 

in subsection (e)(4)(B))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

and 

(III) by striking ‘‘the third phase (as described 

in subsection (e)(4)(C))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; 

and 

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘second 

phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

(3) in subsection (k)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘first phase’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘Phase I’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘second phase’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; 

(4) in subsection (l)(2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase 

I’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase 

II’’; 

(5) in subsection (o)(13)— 

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘second phase’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘third phase’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; 

(6) in subsection (p)— 

(A) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

(i) in clause (vi)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘the third phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(ii) in clause (ix)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase I’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (3)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘the first phase (as described in subsection (e)(6)(A))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase I’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘the second phase (as described in 

subsection (e)(6)(B))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(iii) by striking ‘‘the third phase (as described in 

subsection (e)(6)(C))’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; 

(7) in subsection (r)— 

(A) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘THIRD

PHASE’’ and inserting ‘‘PHASE III’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) in the first sentence— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
548 

(I) by striking ‘‘for the second phase’’ and inserting ‘‘for Phase II’’; 

(II) by striking ‘‘third phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(III) by striking ‘‘second phase period’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase II period’’; and 

(ii) in the second sentence— 

(I) by striking ‘‘second phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase II’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘third phase’’ and inserting 

‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘third phase’’ and inserting ‘‘Phase III’’; and 

(8) in subsection (u)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘the first phase’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Phase I’’. 

SEC. 5126. SHORTENED PERIOD FOR FINAL DECISIONS ON PROPOSALS 

AND APPLICATIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (g)(4)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(4)’’; 

(B) by adding ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) make a final decision on each proposal submitted 

under the SBIR program— 

‘‘(i) not later than 1 year after the date on which the 

applicable solicitation closes, if with respect to the National 

Institutes of Health or the National Science Foundation, or 

90 days after the date on which the applicable solicitation 

closes, if with respect to any other participating agency; or 

‘‘(ii) if the Administrator authorizes an extension with 

respect to a solicitation, not later than 90 days after the 

date that would otherwise be applicable to the agency 

under clause (i);’’; and 

(2) in subsection (o)(4)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(4)’’; 

(B) by adding ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) make a final decision on each proposal submitted 

under the STTR program— 

‘‘(i) not later than 1 year after the date on which the 

applicable solicitation closes, if with respect to the National 

Institutes of Health or the National Science Foundation, or 

90 days after the date on which the applicable solicitation 

closes, if with respect to any other participating agency; or 

‘‘(ii) if the Administrator authorizes an extension for a 

solicitation, not later than 90 days after the date that 

would be applicable to the agency under clause (i);’’. 

(b) OTHER TIMING PROVISIONS.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(hh) TIMING OF RELEASE OF FUNDING.—Federal agencies participating in the SBIR program or STTR program shall, to the extent possible, attempt to shorten the amount of time between the provision of notice of an award under the SBIR program or STTR proVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00578 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
549 

gram and the subsequent release of funding with respect to the 

award. 

‘‘(ii) REPORTING ON TIMING.—Federal agencies participating in 

the SBIR program or STTR program shall provide to the Administrator, for the annual report on the SBIR and STTR program under 

subsection (b)(7), the average amount of time the agency takes to 

make a final decision on proposals submitted under such programs, 

the average amount of time the agency takes to release funding with 

respect to an award under such programs, and the goals established 

to reduce such amounts.’’. 

SEC. 5127. PHASE 0 PROOF OF CONCEPT PARTNERSHIP PILOT PROGRAM. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(jj) PHASE 0 PROOF OF CONCEPT PARTNERSHIP PILOT PROGRAM.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the National Institutes of 

Health may use $5,000,000 of the funds allocated under subsection (n)(1) for a Proof of Concept Partnership pilot program 

to accelerate the creation of small businesses and the commercialization of research innovations from qualifying institutions. 

To implement this program, the Director shall award, through 

a competitive, merit-based process, grants to qualifying institutions. These grants shall only be used to administer Proof of 

Concept Partnership awards in conformity with this subsection. 

‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

‘‘(A) the term ‘Director’ means the Director of the National Institutes of Health; 

‘‘(B) the term ‘pilot program’ refers to the Proof of Concept Partnership pilot program; and 

‘‘(C) the terms ‘qualifying institution’ and ‘institution’ 

mean a university or other research institution that participates in the National Institutes of Health’s STTR program. 

‘‘(3) PROOF OF CONCEPT PARTNERSHIPS.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A Proof of Concept Partnership 

shall be set up by a qualifying institution to award grants 

to individual researchers. These grants should provide researchers with the initial investment and the resources to 

support the proof of concept work and commercialization 

mentoring needed to translate promising research projects 

and technologies into a viable company. This work may include technical validations, market research, clarifying intellectual property rights position and strategy, and investigating commercial or business opportunities. 

‘‘(B) AWARD GUIDELINES.—The administrator of a Proof 

of Concept Partnership program shall award grants in accordance with the following guidelines: 

‘‘(i) The Proof of Concept Partnership shall use a 

market-focused project management oversight process, 

including— 

‘‘(I) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised 

of local experts in translational and proof of concept research, including industry, start-up, venture 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
550 

capital, technical, financial, and business experts 

and university technology transfer officials; 

‘‘(II) technology validation milestones focused 

on market feasibility; 

‘‘(III) simple reporting effective at redirecting 

projects; and 

‘‘(IV) the willingness to reallocate funding 

from failing projects to those with more potential. 

‘‘(ii) Not more than $100,000 shall be awarded towards an individual proposal. 

‘‘(C) EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES AND GUIDANCE.—The 

administrator of a Proof of Concept Partnership program 

shall make educational resources and guidance available to 

researchers attempting to commercialize their innovations. 

‘‘(4) AWARDS.— ‘‘(A) SIZE OF AWARD.—The Director may make awards to a qualifying institution for up to $1,000,000 per year for 

up to 3 years. 

‘‘(B) AWARD CRITERIA.—In determining which qualifying institutions receive pilot program grants, the Director 

shall consider, in addition to any other criteria the Director 

determines necessary, the extent to which qualifying institutions— 

‘‘(i) have an established and proven technology 

transfer or commercialization office and have a plan 

for engaging that office in the program’s implementation; 

‘‘(ii) have demonstrated a commitment to local and 

regional economic development; 

‘‘(iii) are located in diverse geographies and are of 

diverse sizes; 

‘‘(iv) can assemble project management boards 

comprised of industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, and business experts; 

‘‘(v) have an intellectual property rights strategy or 

office; and 

‘‘(vi) demonstrate a plan for sustainability beyond 

the duration of the funding award. 

‘‘(5) LIMITATIONS.—The funds for the pilot program shall 

not be used— 

‘‘(A) for basic research, but to evaluate the commercial 

potential of existing discoveries, including— 

‘‘(i) proof of concept research or prototype development; and 

‘‘(ii) activities that contribute to determining a 

project’s commercialization path, to include technical 

validations, market research, clarifying intellectual 

property rights, and investigating commercial and 

business opportunities; or 

‘‘(B) to fund the acquisition of research equipment or 

supplies unrelated to commercialization activities. 

‘‘(6) EVALUATIVE REPORT.—The Director shall submit to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and 

the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
551 

Senate an evaluative report regarding the activities of the pilot 

program. The report shall include— 

‘‘(A) a detailed description of the institutional and proposal selection process; 

‘‘(B) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program; 

‘‘(C) a detailed description of the pilot program, including incentives and activities undertaken by review board 

experts; 

‘‘(D) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the 

pilot program, including the number of small business concerns included and the number of business packages developed, and the number of projects that progressed into subsequent STTR phases; and 

‘‘(E) an analysis of the program’s effectiveness with 

supporting data. 

‘‘(7) SUNSET.—The pilot program under this subsection 

shall terminate at the end of fiscal year 2017.’’. 

Subtitle C—Oversight and Evaluation 

SEC. 5131. STREAMLINING ANNUAL EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 9(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(b)) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (7)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘STTR programs, including the data’’ 

and inserting the following: ‘‘STTR programs, including— 

‘‘(A) the data’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘(g)(10), (o)(9), and (o)(15), the number’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘under each of the SBIR and 

STTR programs, and a description’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘(g)(8) and (o)(9); 

‘‘(B) the number of proposals received from, and the 

number and total amount of awards to, HUBZone small 

business concerns and firms with venture capital, hedge 

fund, or private equity firm investment (including those 

majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms) under each of 

the SBIR and STTR programs; 

‘‘(C) a description of the extent to which each Federal 

agency is increasing outreach and awards to firms owned 

and controlled by women or by socially or economically disadvantaged individuals under each of the SBIR and STTR 

programs; 

‘‘(D) general information about the implementation of, 

and compliance with the allocation of funds required 

under, subsection (dd) for firms owned in majority part by 

venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms and participating in the SBIR program; 

‘‘(E) a detailed description of appeals of Phase III 

awards and notices of noncompliance with the SBIR Policy 

Directive and the STTR Policy Directive filed by the Administrator with Federal agencies; 

‘‘(F) an accounting of funds, initiatives, and outcomes 

under the Commercialization Readiness Program; and 

‘‘(G) a description’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
552 

(C) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following: 

‘‘(9) to coordinate the implementation of electronic databases at each of the Federal agencies participating in the SBIR 

program or the STTR program, including the technical ability 

of the participating agencies to electronically share data.’’. 

SEC. 5132. DATA COLLECTION FROM AGENCIES FOR SBIR. 

Section 9(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(g)), as 

amended by this title, is further amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (10); 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (8) and (9) as paragraphs 

(9) and (10), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following: 

‘‘(8) collect annually, and maintain in a common format in 

accordance with the simplified reporting requirements under 

subsection (v), such information from awardees as is necessary 

to assess the SBIR program, including information necessary to 

maintain the database described in subsection (k), including— 

‘‘(A) whether an awardee— 

‘‘(i) has venture capital, hedge fund, or private equity firm investment or is majority-owned by multiple 

venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or 

private equity firms and, if so— 

‘‘(I) the amount of venture capital, hedge fund, 

or private equity firm investment that the awardee 

has received as of the date of the award; and 

‘‘(II) the amount of additional capital that the 

awardee has invested in the SBIR technology; 

‘‘(ii) has an investor that— 

‘‘(I) is an individual who is not a citizen of the 

United States or a lawful permanent resident of 

the United States and, if so, the name of any such 

individual; or 

‘‘(II) is a person that is not an individual and 

is not organized under the laws of a State or the 

United States and, if so, the name of any such person; 

‘‘(iii) is owned by a woman or has a woman as a 

principal investigator; 

‘‘(iv) is owned by a socially or economically disadvantaged individual or has a socially or economically disadvantaged individual as a principal investigator; 

‘‘(v) is a faculty member or a student of an institution of higher education, as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

U.S.C. 1001); or 

‘‘(vi) is located in a State described in subsection 

(u)(3); 

‘‘(B) a justification statement from the agency, if an 

awardee receives an award in an amount that is more than 

the award guidelines under this section; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
553 

‘‘(C) data with respect to the Federal and State Technology Partnership Program (FAST Program);’’. 

SEC. 5133. DATA COLLECTION FROM AGENCIES FOR STTR. 

Section 9(o) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(o)), as 

amended by this title, is further amended by striking paragraph (9) 

and inserting the following: 

‘‘(9) collect annually, and maintain in a common format in 

accordance with the simplified reporting requirements under 

subsection (v), such information from applicants and awardees 

as is necessary to assess the STTR program outputs and outcomes, including information necessary to maintain the database described in subsection (k), including— 

‘‘(A) whether an applicant or awardee— 

‘‘(i) has venture capital, hedge fund, or private equity firm investment or is majority-owned by multiple 

venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or 

private equity firms and, if so— 

‘‘(I) the amount of venture capital, hedge fund, 

or private equity firm investment that the applicant or awardee has received as of the date of the 

application or award, as applicable; and 

‘‘(II) the amount of additional capital that the 

applicant or awardee has invested in the STTR 

technology; 

‘‘(ii) has an investor that— 

‘‘(I) is an individual who is not a citizen of the 

United States or a lawful permanent resident of 

the United States and, if so, the name of any such 

individual; or 

‘‘(II) is a person that is not an individual and 

is not organized under the laws of a State or the 

United States and, if so, the name of any such person; 

‘‘(iii) is owned by a woman or has a woman as a 

principal investigator; 

‘‘(iv) is owned by a socially or economically disadvantaged individual or has a socially or economically disadvantaged individual as a principal investigator; 

‘‘(v) is a faculty member or a student of an institution of higher education, as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

U.S.C. 1001); or 

‘‘(vi) is located in a State in which the total value 

of contracts awarded to small business concerns under 

all STTR programs is less than the total value of contracts awarded to small business concerns in a majority of other States, as determined by the Administrator 

in biennial fiscal years, beginning with fiscal year 

2008, based on the most recent statistics compiled by 

the Administrator; 

‘‘(B) if an awardee receives an award in an amount 

that is more than the award guidelines under this section, 

a statement from the agency that justifies the award 

amount; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
554 

‘‘(C) data with respect to the Federal and State Technology Partnership Program (FAST Program);’’. 

SEC. 5134. PUBLIC DATABASE. 

Section 9(k)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(k)(1)) 

is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(F) for each small business concern that has received 

a Phase I or Phase II SBIR or STTR award from a Federal 

agency, whether the small business concern— 

‘‘(i) has venture capital, hedge fund, or private equity firm investment and, if so, whether the small business concern is registered as majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, 

or private equity firms as required under subsection 

(dd)(3); 

‘‘(ii) is owned by a woman or has a woman as a 

principal investigator; 

‘‘(iii) is owned by a socially or economically disadvantaged individual or has a socially or economically disadvantaged individual as a principal investigator; 

‘‘(iv) is owned by a faculty member or a student of 

an institution of higher education, as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); or 

‘‘(v) received assistance under the Federal and 

State Technology Partnership Program (FAST Program).’’. 

SEC. 5135. GOVERNMENT DATABASE. 

Section 9(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(k)) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Not later’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Act of 2000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011’’; 

(B) by striking subparagraph (C); 

(C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 

subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; 

(D) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, the following: 

‘‘(A) contains for each small business concern that applies for, submits a proposal for, or receives an award 

under Phase I or Phase II of the SBIR program or the 

STTR program— 

‘‘(i) the name, size, and location of, and the identifying number assigned by the Administration to, the 

small business concern; 

‘‘(ii) an abstract of the applicable project; 

‘‘(iii) the specific aims of the project; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
555 

‘‘(iv) the number of employees of the small business 

concern; 

‘‘(v) the names and titles of the key individuals 

that will carry out the project, the position each key individual holds in the small business concern, and contact information for each key individual; 

‘‘(vi) the percentage of effort each individual described in clause (v) will contribute to the project; 

‘‘(vii) whether the small business concern is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms; and 

‘‘(viii) the Federal agency to which the application 

is made and contact information for the person or office within the Federal agency that is responsible for 

reviewing applications and making awards under the 

SBIR program or the STTR program;’’; 

(E) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 

subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; 

(F) by inserting after subparagraph (C), as so redesignated, the following: 

‘‘(D) includes, for each awardee— 

‘‘(i) the name, size, and location of, and any identifying number assigned by the Administrator to, the 

awardee; 

‘‘(ii) whether the awardee has venture capital, 

hedge fund, or private equity firm investment and, if 

so— 

‘‘(I) the amount of venture capital, hedge fund, 

or private equity firm investment as of the date of 

the award; 

‘‘(II) the percentage of ownership of the awardee held by a venture capital operating company, 

hedge fund, or private equity firm, including 

whether the awardee is majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge 

funds, or private equity firms; and 

‘‘(III) the amount of additional capital that the 

awardee has invested in the SBIR or STTR technology, which information shall be collected on an 

annual basis; 

‘‘(iii) the names and locations of any affiliates of 

the awardee; 

‘‘(iv) the number of employees of the awardee; 

‘‘(v) the number of employees of the affiliates of the 

awardee; and 

‘‘(vi) the names of, and the percentage of ownership 

of the awardee held by— 

‘‘(I) any individual who is not a citizen of the 

United States or a lawful permanent resident of 

the United States; or 

‘‘(II) any person that is not an individual and 

is not organized under the laws of a State or the 

United States;’’; 

(G) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
556 

(H) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated, by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(I) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(G) includes a timely and accurate list of any individual or small business concern that has participated in 

the SBIR program or STTR program that has been— 

‘‘(i) convicted of a fraud-related crime involving 

funding received under the SBIR program or STTR 

program; or 

‘‘(ii) found civilly liable for a fraud-related violation involving funding received under the SBIR program or STTR program.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(C) GOVERNMENT DATABASE.—Not later than 60 days 

after the date established by a Federal agency for submitting applications or proposals for a Phase I or Phase II 

award under the SBIR program or STTR program, the 

head of the Federal agency shall submit to the Administrator the data required under paragraph (2) with respect 

to each small business concern that applies or submits a 

proposal for the Phase I or Phase II award.’’. 

SEC. 5136. ACCURACY IN FUNDING BASE CALCULATIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every year thereafter until the date that is 5 

years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— 

(1) conduct a fiscal and management audit of the SBIR 

program and the STTR program for the applicable period to— 

(A) determine whether Federal agencies comply with 

the expenditure amount requirements under subsections 

(f)(1) and (n)(1) of section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title; 

(B) assess the extent of compliance with the requirements of section 9(i)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638(i)(2)) by Federal agencies participating in the 

SBIR program or the STTR program and the Administration; 

(C) assess whether it would be more consistent and effective to base the amount of the allocations under the 

SBIR program and the STTR program on a percentage of 

the research and development budget of a Federal agency, 

rather than the extramural budget of the Federal agency; 

and 

(D) determine the portion of the extramural research or 

research and development budget of a Federal agency that 

each Federal agency spends for administrative purposes relating to the SBIR program or STTR program, and for 

what specific purposes it is used, including the portion, if 

any, of such budget the Federal agency spends for salaries 

and expenses, travel to visit applicants, outreach events, 

marketing, and technical assistance; and 

(2) submit a report to the Committee on Small Business 

and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on 

Small Business and the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology of the House of Representatives regarding the audit 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
557 

conducted under paragraph (1), including the assessments required under subparagraph (B) and the determinations made 

under subparagraph (D) of paragraph (1). 

(b) DEFINITION OF APPLICABLE PERIOD.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘applicable period’’ means— 

(1) for the first report submitted under this section, the period beginning on October 1, 2005, and ending on September 30 

of the last full fiscal year before the date of enactment of this 

Act for which information is available; and 

(2) for the second and each subsequent report submitted 

under this section, the period— 

(A) beginning on October 1 of the first fiscal year after 

the end of the most recent full fiscal year relating to which 

a report under this section was submitted; and 

(B) ending on September 30 of the last full fiscal year 

before the date of the report. 

SEC. 5137. CONTINUED EVALUATION BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF 

SCIENCES. 

Section 108 of the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 2000 

(15 U.S.C. 638 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(e) EXTENSIONS AND ENHANCEMENTS OF AUTHORITY.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date 

of enactment of the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011, 

the head of each agency described in subsection (a), in consultation with the Small Business Administration, shall cooperatively enter into an agreement with the National Academy of 

Sciences for the National Research Council to, not later than 4 

years after the date of enactment of the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011, and every 4 years thereafter— 

‘‘(A) continue the most recent study under this section 

relating to the issues described in subparagraphs (A), (B), 

(C), and (E) of subsection (a)(1); 

‘‘(B) conduct a comprehensive study of how the STTR 

program has stimulated technological innovation and technology transfer, including— 

‘‘(i) a review of the collaborations created between 

small businesses and research institutions, including 

an evaluation of the effectiveness of the program in 

stimulating new collaborations and any obstacles that 

may prevent or inhibit the creation of such collaborations; 

‘‘(ii) an evaluation of the effectiveness of the program at transferring technology and capabilities developed through Federal funding; 

‘‘(iii) to the extent practicable, an evaluation of the 

economic benefits achieved by the STTR program, including the economic rate of return; 

‘‘(iv) an analysis of how Federal agencies are using 

small businesses that have completed Phase II under 

the STTR program to fulfill their procurement needs; 

‘‘(v) an analysis of whether additional funds could 

be employed effectively by the STTR program; and 

‘‘(vi) an assessment of the systems and minimum 

performance standards relating to commercialization 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
558 

success established under section 9(qq) of the Small 

Business Act; 

‘‘(C) make recommendations with respect to the issues 

described in subparagraphs (A), (D), and (E) of subsection 

(a)(2) and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph; and 

‘‘(D) estimate, to the extent practicable, the number of 

jobs created by the SBIR program or STTR program of the 

agency. 

‘‘(2) CONSULTATION.—An agreement under paragraph (1) 

shall require the National Research Council to ensure that there 

is participation by and consultation with the small business 

community, the Administration, and other interested parties as 

described in subsection (b). 

‘‘(3) REPORTING.—An agreement under paragraph (1) shall 

require that not later than 4 years after the date of enactment 

of the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011, and every 4 

years thereafter, the National Research Council shall submit to 

the head of the agency entering into the agreement, the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate, 

and the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, 

a report regarding the study conducted under paragraph (1) 

and containing the recommendations described in paragraph 

(1).’’. 

SEC. 5138. TECHNOLOGY INSERTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(kk) PHASE III REPORTING.—The annual SBIR or STTR report 

to Congress by the Administration under subsection (b)(7) shall include, for each Phase III award— 

‘‘(1) the name of the agency or component of the agency or 

the non-Federal source of capital making the Phase III award; 

‘‘(2) the name of the small business concern or individual 

receiving the Phase III award; and 

‘‘(3) the dollar amount of the Phase III award.’’. 

SEC. 5139. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTIONS. 

(a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall 

conduct a study of the SBIR program to assess whether— 

(1) Federal agencies comply with the data rights protections 

for SBIR awardees and the technologies of SBIR awardees 

under section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638); 

(2) the laws and policy directives intended to clarify the 

scope of data rights, including in prototypes, mentor-protege relationships, and agreements with Federal laboratories, are sufficient to protect SBIR awardees; and 

(3) there is an effective grievance tracking process for SBIR 

awardees who have grievances against a Federal agency regarding data rights and a process for resolving those grievances. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and 

the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on Science, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
559 

Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report regarding the study conducted under subsection (a). 

SEC. 5140. OBTAINING CONSENT FROM SBIR AND STTR APPLICANTS 

TO RELEASE CONTACT INFORMATION TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ll) CONSENT TO RELEASE CONTACT INFORMATION TO ORGANI- ZATIONS.— 

‘‘(1) ENABLING CONCERN TO GIVE CONSENT.—Each Federal 

agency required by this section to conduct an SBIR program or 

an STTR program shall enable a small business concern that 

is an SBIR applicant or an STTR applicant to indicate to the 

Federal agency whether the Federal agency has the consent of 

the concern to— 

‘‘(A) identify the concern to appropriate local and Statelevel economic development organizations as an SBIR applicant or an STTR applicant; and 

‘‘(B) release the contact information of the concern to 

such organizations. 

‘‘(2) RULES.—The Administrator shall establish rules to implement this subsection. The rules shall include a requirement 

that a Federal agency include in the SBIR and STTR application a provision through which the applicant can indicate consent for purposes of paragraph (1).’’. 

SEC. 5141. PILOT TO ALLOW FUNDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERSIGHT, AND CONTRACT PROCESSING COSTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding 

at the end the following: 

‘‘(mm) ASSISTANCE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, OVERSIGHT, AND CONTRACT PROCESSING COSTS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), for the 3 fiscal 

years beginning after the date of enactment of this subsection, 

the Administrator shall allow each Federal agency required to 

conduct an SBIR program to use not more than 3 percent of the 

funds allocated to the SBIR program of the Federal agency 

for— 

‘‘(A) the administration of the SBIR program or the 

STTR program of the Federal agency; 

‘‘(B) the provision of outreach and technical assistance 

relating to the SBIR program or STTR program of the Federal agency, including technical assistance site visits, personnel interviews, and national conferences; 

‘‘(C) the implementation of commercialization and outreach initiatives that were not in effect on the date of enactment of this subsection; 

‘‘(D) carrying out the program under subsection (y); 

‘‘(E) activities relating to oversight and congressional 

reporting, including waste, fraud, and abuse prevention activities; 

‘‘(F) targeted reviews of recipients of awards under the 

SBIR program or STTR program of the Federal agency 

that the head of the Federal agency determines are at high 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
560 

risk for fraud, waste, or abuse to ensure compliance with 

requirements of the SBIR program or STTR program, respectively; 

‘‘(G) the implementation of oversight and quality control measures, including verification of reports and invoices 

and cost reviews; 

‘‘(H) carrying out subsection (dd); 

‘‘(I) contract processing costs relating to the SBIR program or STTR program of the Federal agency; and 

‘‘(J) funding for additional personnel and assistance 

with application reviews. 

‘‘(2) OUTREACH AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B), a Federal agency participating in the program under 

this subsection shall use a portion of the funds authorized 

for uses under paragraph (1) to carry out the policy directive required under subsection (j)(2)(F) and to increase the 

participation of States with respect to which a low level of 

SBIR awards have historically been awarded. 

‘‘(B) WAIVER.—A Federal agency may request the Administrator to waive the requirement contained in subparagraph (A). Such request shall include an explanation of 

why the waiver is necessary. The Administrator may grant 

the waiver based on a determination that the agency has 

demonstrated a sufficient need for the waiver, that the outreach objectives of the agency are being met, and that there 

is increased participation by States with respect to which 

a low level of SBIR awards have historically been awarded. 

‘‘(3) PERFORMANCE CRITERIA.—A Federal agency may not 

use funds as authorized under paragraph (1) until after the effective date of performance criteria, which the Administrator 

shall establish, to measure any benefits of using funds as authorized under paragraph (1) and to assess continuation of the 

authority under paragraph (1). 

‘‘(4) RULES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall issue rules 

to carry out this subsection. 

‘‘(5) COORDINATION WITH IG.—Each Federal agency shall 

coordinate the activities funded under subparagraph (E), (F), or 

(G) of paragraph (1) with their respective Inspectors General, 

when appropriate, and each Federal agency that allocates more 

than $50,000,000 to the SBIR program of the Federal agency 

for a fiscal year may share such funding with its Inspector General when the Inspector General performs such activities. 

‘‘(6) REPORTING.—The Administrator shall collect data and 

provide to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business, the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on the use of funds under this subsection, including funds 

used to achieve the objectives of paragraph (2)(A) and any use 

of the waiver authority under paragraph (2)(B).’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
561 

(A) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ‘‘shall not’’ and all 

that follows through ‘‘make available for the purpose’’ and 

inserting ‘‘shall not make available for the purpose’’; and 

(B) in subsection (y)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (4); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as 

paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively. 

(2) TRANSITIONAL RULE.—Notwithstanding the amendments made by paragraph (1), subsections (f)(2) and (y)(4) of 

section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as in effect 

on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, shall continue to apply to each Federal agency until the effective date of 

the performance criteria established by the Administrator under 

subsection (mm)(3) of section 9 of the Small Business Act, as 

added by subsection (a). 

(3) PROSPECTIVE REPEAL.—Effective on the first day of the 

fourth full fiscal year following the date of enactment of this 

Act, section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as 

amended by paragraph (1) of this section, is amended— 

(A) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ‘‘shall not make 

available for the purpose’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘shall not— 

‘‘(A) use any of its SBIR budget established pursuant 

to paragraph (1) for the purpose of funding administrative 

costs of the program, including costs associated with salaries and expenses; or 

‘‘(B) make available for the purpose’’; and 

(B) in subsection (y)— 

(i) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

(ii) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: 

‘‘(4) FUNDING.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and each 

Secretary of a military department may use not more than 

an amount equal to 1 percent of the funds available to the 

Department of Defense or the military department pursuant 

to the Small Business Innovation Research Program for 

payment of expenses incurred to administer the Commercialization Readiness Program under this subsection. 

‘‘(B) LIMITATIONS.—The funds described in subparagraph (A)— 

‘‘(i) shall not be subject to the limitations on the 

use of funds in subsection (f)(2); and 

‘‘(ii) shall not be used to make Phase III awards.’’. 

SEC. 5142. GAO STUDY WITH RESPECT TO VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANY, HEDGE FUND, AND PRIVATE EQUITY 

FIRM INVOLVEMENT. 

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, 

and every 3 years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall— 

(1) conduct a study of the impact of requirements relating 

to venture capital operating company, hedge fund, and private 

equity firm involvement under section 9 of the Small Business 

Act; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
562 

(2) submit to Congress a report regarding the study conducted under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 5143. REDUCING VULNERABILITY OF SBIR AND STTR PROGRAMS 

TO FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE. 

(a) FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE PREVENTION.— (1) AMENDMENTS REQUIRED FOR FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE

PREVENTION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall amend the SBIR Policy Directive and the STTR Policy Directive to include measures 

to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse in the SBIR program and 

the STTR program. 

(2) CONTENT OF AMENDMENTS.—The amendments required 

under paragraph (1) shall include— 

(A) definitions or descriptions of fraud, waste, and 

abuse; 

(B) guidelines for the monitoring and oversight of applicants to and recipients of awards under the SBIR program or the STTR program; 

(C) a requirement that each Federal agency that participates in the SBIR program or STTR program include 

information concerning the method established by the Inspector General of the Federal agency to report fraud, 

waste, and abuse (including any telephone hotline or Webbased platform)— 

(i) on the Web site of the Federal agency; and 

(ii) in any solicitation or notice of funding opportunity issued by the Federal agency for the SBIR program or the STTR program; and 

(D) a requirement that each applicant for and small 

business concern that receives funding under the SBIR program or the STTR program shall certify whether the applicant or small business concern is in compliance with the 

laws relating to the SBIR program and the STTR program 

and the conduct guidelines established under the SBIR Policy Directive and the STTR Policy Directive. 

(3) CONSULTATION.—The Administrator shall develop, in 

consultation with the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity 

and Efficiency, the procedures and requirements for the certification set forth under paragraph (2)(D) after providing notice 

of and an opportunity for public comment on such procedures 

and requirements. 

(4) CERTIFICATION.—The certification developed under 

paragraph (3) may— 

(A) cover the lifecycle of an award to require certifications at the application, funding, reporting, and closeout 

phases of every SBIR and STTR award; 

(B) require the small business concern to certify compliance with the ‘‘principal investigator primary employment’’ 

requirement, the ‘‘small business concern’’ definition requirement, and the ‘‘performance of work’’ requirements as 

set forth in the Directive applicable to the award; 

(C) require the small business concern to disclose 

whether it has applied for, plans to apply for, or received 

an SBIR or STTR award for identical or essentially equivalent work (as defined under the SBIR Policy Directive and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
563 

the STTR Policy Directive), and require the concern to certify that the award that it is applying for or obtaining 

funding for is not identical or essentially equivalent to 

work it has performed, or will perform, in connection with 

any other SBIR or STTR award that the concern has applied for or received from any other agency except as fully 

disclosed to all funding agencies; and 

(D) require that the small business concern certify that 

it will or did perform the work on the award at its facilities 

with its employees, unless otherwise indicated. 

(5) INSPECTORS GENERAL.—The Inspector General of each 

Federal agency that participates in the SBIR program or STTR 

program shall cooperate to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse in 

the SBIR program and the STTR program by— 

(A) establishing fraud detection indicators; 

(B) reviewing regulations and operating procedures of 

the Federal agency; 

(C) coordinating information sharing between Federal 

agencies, to the extent otherwise permitted under Federal 

law; and 

(D) improving the education and training of and outreach to— 

(i) administrators of the SBIR program and the 

STTR program of the Federal agency; 

(ii) applicants to the SBIR program or the STTR 

program; and 

(iii) recipients of awards under the SBIR program 

or the STTR program. 

(b) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

of enactment of this Act to establish a baseline of changes made to 

the program to fight fraud, waste, and abuse, and every 4 years 

thereafter to evaluate the effectiveness of the agency strategies, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall— 

(1) conduct a study that evaluates— 

(A) the implementation by each Federal agency that 

participates in the SBIR program or the STTR program of 

the amendments to the SBIR Policy Directive and the 

STTR Policy Directive made pursuant to subsection (a); 

(B) the effectiveness of the management information 

system of each Federal agency that participates in the SBIR 

program or STTR program in identifying duplicative SBIR 

and STTR projects; 

(C) the effectiveness of the risk management strategies 

of each Federal agency that participates in the SBIR program or STTR program in identifying areas of the SBIR 

program or the STTR program that are at high risk for 

fraud; 

(D) technological tools that may be used to detect patterns of behavior that may indicate fraud by applicants to 

the SBIR program or the STTR program; 

(E) the success of each Federal agency that participates 

in the SBIR program or STTR program in reducing fraud, 

waste, and abuse in the SBIR program or the STTR program of the Federal agency; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
564 

(F) the extent to which the Inspector General of each 

Federal agency that participates in the SBIR and STTR 

program effectively conducts investigations, audits, inspections, and outreach relating to the SBIR and STTR programs of the Federal agency; and 

(G) the effectiveness of the Government and public 

databases described in section 9(k) of the Small Business 

Act (15 U.S.C. 638(k)) in reducing vulnerabilities of the 

SBIR program and the STTR program to fraud, waste, and 

abuse, particularly with respect to Federal agencies funding 

duplicative proposals and business concerns falsifying information in proposals; and 

(2) submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate, the Committee on Small Business 

and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 

House of Representatives, and the head of each Federal agency 

that participates in the SBIR program or STTR program a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1). 

(c) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORTS.—Not later than October 1 of 

each year, the Inspector General of each Federal agency that participates in the SBIR program or STTR program shall submit to the 

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate 

and the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report describing— 

(1) the number of cases referred to the Inspector General in 

the preceding year that related to fraud, waste, or abuse with 

respect to the SBIR program or STTR program; 

(2) the actions taken in each case described in paragraph 

(1) if fraud, waste, or abuse was determined to have occurred; 

(3) if no action was taken in a case described in paragraph 

(1) and fraud, waste, or abuse was determined to have occurred, the justification for action not being taken; and 

(4) an accounting of the funds used to address fraud, 

waste, and abuse, including a description of personnel and resources funded and funds that were recovered or saved. 

SEC. 5144. SIMPLIFIED PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 9(v) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(v)) is 

amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘SIMPLIFIED RE- PORTING REQUIREMENTS’’ and inserting ‘‘REDUCING PAPERWORK

AND COMPLIANCE BURDEN’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘The Administrator’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) STANDARDIZATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—The 

Administrator’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) SIMPLIFICATION OF APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

paragraph, and after a period of public comment, the Administrator shall issue regulations or guidelines, taking into consideration the unique needs of each Federal agency, to ensure that 

each Federal agency required to carry out an SBIR program or 

STTR program simplifies and standardizes the program proposal, selection, contracting, compliance, and audit procedures 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
565 

for the SBIR program or STTR program of the Federal agency 

(including procedures relating to overhead rates for applicants 

and documentation requirements) to reduce the paperwork and 

regulatory compliance burden on small business concerns applying to and participating in the SBIR program or STTR program.’’. 

Subtitle D—Policy Directives 

SEC. 5151. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO THE SBIR AND THE STTR 

POLICY DIRECTIVES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall promulgate amendments to the SBIR Policy Directive and the STTR Policy Directive 

to conform such directives to this title and the amendments made 

by this title. 

(b) PUBLISHING SBIR POLICY DIRECTIVE AND THE STTR POLICY

DIRECTIVE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall publish the amended SBIR Policy Directive and the amended STTR 

Policy Directive in the Federal Register. 

Subtitle E—Other Provisions 

SEC. 5161. REPORT ON SBIR AND STTR PROGRAM GOALS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(nn) ANNUAL REPORT ON SBIR AND STTR PROGRAM GOALS.— 

‘‘(1) DEVELOPMENT OF METRICS.—The head of each Federal 

agency required to participate in the SBIR program or the 

STTR program shall develop metrics to evaluate the effectiveness and the benefit to the people of the United States of the 

SBIR program and the STTR program of the Federal agency 

that— 

‘‘(A) are science-based and statistically driven; 

‘‘(B) reflect the mission of the Federal agency; and 

‘‘(C) include factors relating to the economic impact of 

the programs. 

‘‘(2) EVALUATION.—The head of each Federal agency described in paragraph (1) shall conduct an annual evaluation 

using the metrics developed under paragraph (1) of— 

‘‘(A) the SBIR program and the STTR program of the 

Federal agency; and 

‘‘(B) the benefits to the people of the United States of 

the SBIR program and the STTR program of the Federal 

agency. 

‘‘(3) REPORT.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The head of each Federal agency described in paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate 

committees of Congress and the Administrator an annual 

report describing in detail the results of an evaluation conducted under paragraph (2). 

‘‘(B) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF REPORT.—The head of 

each Federal agency described in paragraph (1) shall make 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
566 

each report submitted under subparagraph (A) available to 

the public online. 

‘‘(C) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means— 

‘‘(i) the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate; and 

‘‘(ii) the Committee on Small Business and the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 

House of Representatives.’’. 

SEC. 5162. COMPETITIVE SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR SBIR AND 

STTR PROGRAMS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(oo) COMPETITIVE SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR SBIR AND

STTR PROGRAMS.—All funds awarded, appropriated, or otherwise 

made available in accordance with subsection (f) or (n) must be 

awarded pursuant to competitive and merit-based selection procedures.’’. 

SEC. 5163. LOAN RESTRICTIONS. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 

the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Small Business 

and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House 

of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report analyzing what restrictions, conditions, or covenants contained in a note, bond, debenture, other evidence of indebtedness, or preferred stock should constitute affiliation 

under section 121.103(a) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, for 

purposes of section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638). 

SEC. 5164. LIMITATION ON PILOT PROGRAMS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(pp) LIMITATION ON PILOT PROGRAMS.— 

‘‘(1) EXISTING PILOT PROGRAMS.—The Administrator may 

only carry out a covered pilot program that is in operation on 

the date of enactment of this subsection during the 3-year period beginning on such date of enactment. 

‘‘(2) NEW PILOT PROGRAMS.—The Administrator may only 

carry out a covered pilot program established after the date of 

enactment of this subsection— 

‘‘(A) during the 3-year period beginning on the date on 

which such program is established; and 

‘‘(B) if such program does not continue and is not 

based on, in any manner, a previously established covered 

pilot program. 

‘‘(3) COVERED PILOT PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this subsection, 

the term ‘covered pilot program’ means any initiative, project, 

innovation, or other activity— 

‘‘(A) established by the Administrator; 

‘‘(B) relating to an SBIR or STTR program; and 

‘‘(C) not specifically authorized by law.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
567 

SEC. 5165. COMMERCIALIZATION SUCCESS. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(qq) MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PARTICIPATION.— 

‘‘(1) PROGRESS TO PHASE II SUCCESS.— 

‘‘(A) ESTABLISHMENT OF SYSTEM AND MINIMUM COMMERCIALIZATION RATE.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

of enactment of this subsection, the head of each Federal 

agency participating in the SBIR or STTR program shall— 

‘‘(i) establish a system to measure, where appropriate, the success of small business concerns with respect to the receipt of Phase II SBIR or STTR awards 

for projects that have received Phase I SBIR or STTR 

awards; 

‘‘(ii) establish a minimum performance standard 

for small business concerns with respect to the receipt 

of Phase II SBIR or STTR awards for projects that 

have received Phase I SBIR or STTR awards; and 

‘‘(iii) begin evaluating, each fiscal year, whether 

each small business concern that received a Phase I 

SBIR or STTR award from the agency meets the minimum performance standard established under clause 

(ii). 

‘‘(B) CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO MEET MINIMUM

COMMERCIALIZATION RATE.—If the head of a Federal agency 

determines that a small business concern that received a 

Phase I SBIR or STTR award from the agency is not meeting the minimum performance standard established under 

subparagraph (A)(ii), such concern may not participate in 

Phase I (or Phase II if under the authority of subsection 

(cc)) of the SBIR or STTR program of that agency during 

the 1-year period beginning on the date on which such determination is made. 

‘‘(2) PROGRESS TO PHASE III SUCCESS.— 

‘‘(A) ESTABLISHMENT OF SYSTEM AND MINIMUM COMMERCIALIZATION RATE.—Not later than 2 years after the 

date of enactment of this subsection, the head of each Federal agency participating in the SBIR or STTR program 

shall— 

‘‘(i) establish a system to measure, where appropriate, the success of small business concerns with respect to the receipt of Phase III SBIR or STTR awards 

for projects that have received Phase I SBIR or STTR 

awards; 

‘‘(ii) establish a minimum performance standard 

for small business concerns with respect to the receipt 

of Phase III SBIR or STTR awards for projects that 

have received Phase I SBIR or STTR awards; and 

‘‘(iii) begin evaluating, each fiscal year, whether 

each small business concern that received a Phase I 

SBIR or STTR award from the agency meets the minimum performance standard established under clause 

(ii). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
568 

‘‘(B) CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO MEET MINIMUM

COMMERCIALIZATION RATE.—If the head of a Federal agency 

determines that a small business concern that received a 

Phase I SBIR or STTR award from the agency is not meeting the minimum performance standard established under 

subparagraph (A)(ii), such concern may not participate in 

Phase I (or Phase II if under the authority of subsection 

(cc)) of the SBIR or STTR program of that agency during 

the 1-year period beginning on the date on which such determination is made. 

‘‘(3) ADMINISTRATION OVERSIGHT.— 

‘‘(A) APPROVAL AND PUBLICATION OF SYSTEMS AND MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.—Each system and minimum performance standard established under paragraph 

(1) or paragraph (2) shall be submitted by the head of the 

applicable Federal agency to the Administrator and shall 

be subject to the approval of the Administrator. In making 

a determination with respect to approval, the Administrator shall ensure that the minimum performance standard exceeds a de minimis level. The Administrator shall 

publish on the Internet Web site of the Administration the 

systems and minimum performance standards approved. 

‘‘(B) SUBMISSION OF EVALUATION RESULTS BY AGENCY.—The head of each covered Federal agency shall submit 

to the Administrator the results of each evaluation conducted under paragraph (1) or paragraph (2). 

‘‘(4) REQUIREMENT OF NOTICE AND COMMENT.—Each system 

and minimum performance standard established under paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) and each approval provided by the 

Administrator under paragraph (3)(A), at least 60 days before 

becoming effective, shall be preceded by the provision of notice 

of and an opportunity for public comment on such system, 

standard, or approval.’’. 

SEC. 5166. PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(rr) PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION.—In order to increase the number of small businesses receiving awards under the 

SBIR or STTR programs of participating agencies, and to simplify 

the application process for such awards, the Administrator shall establish and maintain a public Internet Web site on which the Administrator shall publish such information relating to notice of and 

application for awards under the SBIR program and STTR program of each participating Federal agency as the Administrator determines appropriate.’’. 

SEC. 5167. REPORT ON ENHANCEMENT OF MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES. 

Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638), as amended by this title, is further amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ss) REPORT ON ENHANCEMENT OF MANUFACTURING ACTIVI- TIES.—Not later than October 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, the head of each Federal agency that makes more than $50,000,000 in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
569 

awards under the SBIR and STTR programs of the agency combined shall submit to the Administrator, for inclusion in the annual 

report required under subsection (b)(7), information that includes— 

‘‘(1) a description of efforts undertaken by the head of the 

Federal agency to enhance United States manufacturing activities; 

‘‘(2) a comprehensive description of the actions undertaken 

each year by the head of the Federal agency in carrying out the 

SBIR or STTR program of the agency in support of Executive 

Order 13329 (69 Fed. Reg. 9181; relating to encouraging innovation in manufacturing); 

‘‘(3) an assessment of the effectiveness of the actions described in paragraph (2) at enhancing the research and development of United States manufacturing technologies and processes; 

‘‘(4) a description of efforts by vendors selected to provide 

discretionary technical assistance under subsection (q)(1) to 

help SBIR and STTR concerns manufacture in the United 

States; and 

‘‘(5) recommendations that the program managers of the 

SBIR or STTR program of the agency consider appropriate for 

additional actions to increase the effectiveness of enhancing 

manufacturing activities.’’. 

SEC. 5168. COORDINATION OF THE SBIR PROGRAM AND THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM TO STIMULATE COMPETITIVE RESEARCH. 

(a) COORDINATION REQUIRED.—The head of a Federal agency 

that participates in the SBIR program and the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research or the Institutional Development Award Program shall coordinate, to the extent possible, the 

initiatives of the agency with respect to such programs. 

(b) COORDINATION REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 

date of enactment of this Act, the head of each Federal agency that 

participates in the SBIR program and the Experimental Program to 

Stimulate Competitive Research or the Institutional Development 

Award Program shall submit to the Administrator, the Committee 

on Small Business and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report describing the 

actions taken during the preceding 1-year period to increase coordination between such programs to maximize existing resources. 

(c) PARTICIPATION REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the 

date of enactment of this Act, the head of each Federal agency that 

participates in the SBIR program and the Experimental Program to 

Stimulate Competitive Research or the Institutional Development 

Award Program shall submit to the Administrator, the Committee 

on Small Business and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report analyzing 

whether actions taken to increase the coordination of such programs 

have been successful in attracting entrepreneurs into the SBIR program and increasing the participation of States with respect to 

which a low level of SBIR awards have historically been awarded. 

And the Senate agree to the same. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
570 

From the Committee on Armed Services, for consideration of 

the House bill and the Senate amendment, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, MAC THORNBERRY, W. TODD AKIN, JEFF MILLER, FRANK A. LOBIONDO, MICHAEL R. TURNER, JOHN KLINE, MIKE ROGERS of Alabama, 

BILL SHUSTER, K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, ROBERT J. WITTMAN, DUNCAN HUNTER, THOMAS J. ROONEY, ROBERT T. SCHILLING, TIM GRIFFIN, ALLEN B. WEST, ADAM SMITH, SILVESTRE REYES, LORETTA SANCHEZ, MIKE MCINTYRE, ROBERT E. ANDREWS, SUSAN A. DAVIS, JAMES R. LANGEVIN, RICK LARSEN, JIM COOPER, JOE COURTNEY, DAVID LOEBSACK, NIKI TSONGAS, From the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for consideration of matters within the jurisdiction of that committee 

under clause 11 of rule X: 

MIKE ROGERS of Michigan, 

C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, From the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for 

consideration of secs. 548 amd 572 of the House bill, and secs. 

572 and 573 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

THOMAS E. PETRI, 

JOSEPH J. HECK, 

From the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for consideration of secs. 911, 1099A, 2852 and 3114 of the House bill, and 

sec. 1089 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

From the Committee on Financial Services, for consideration of 

sec. 645 of the House bill, and sec. 1245 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

SPENCER BACHUS, 

SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, 

GARY L. ACKERMAN, 

From the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for consideration of 

secs. 1013, 1014, 1055, 1056, 1086, 1092, 1202, 1204, 1205, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
571 

1211, 1214, 1216, 1218, 1219, 1226, 1228–1230, 1237, 1301, 

1303, 1532, 1533 and 3112 of the House bill, and secs. 159, 

1012, 1031, 1033, 1046, 1201, 1203, 1204, 1206–1209, 1221– 

1225, 1228, 1230, 1245, title XIII and sec. 1609 of the Senate 

amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, STEVE CHABOT, From the Committee on Homeland Security, for consideration 

of sec. 1099H of the House bill, and sec. 1092 of the Senate 

amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

BENNIE G. THOMPSON, From the Committee on the Judiciary, for consideration of secs. 

531 of subtitle D of title V, 573, 843 and 2804 of the House 

Bill, and secs. 553 and 848 of the Senate amendment, and 

modifications committed to conference: 

LAMAR SMITH, From the Committee on Natural Resources, for consideration of 

secs. 313, 601 and 1097 of the House bill, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

DOC HASTINGS, ROB BISHOP, EDWARD J. MARKEY, From the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 

for consderation of secs. 598, 662, 803, 813, 844, 847, 849, 937– 

939, 1081, 1091, 1101–1111, 1116 and 2813 of the House bill, 

and secs. 827, 845, 1044, 1102–1107 and 2812 of the Senate 

amendment, and modifications committed to confeence: 

DENNIS A. ROSS, JAMES LANKFORD, ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, From the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for 

consideration of secs. 911 and 1098 of the House bill, and secs. 

885, 911, 912 and Division E of the Senate amendment, and 

modifications committed to conference: 

RALPH M. HALL, BENJAMIN QUAYLE, EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, From the Committee on Small Business, for consideration of 

sec. 804 of the House bill, and secs. 885–887 and Division E 

of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

RENEE L. ELLMERS, 

From the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for 

consideration of secs. 314, 366, 601, 1098 and 2814 of the 

House bill, and secs. 262, 313, 315, 1045, 1088 and 3301 of the 

Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

JOHN L. MICA, 

CHIP CRAVAACK, From the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for consideration of 

secs. 551, 573, 705, 731 and 1099C of the House bill, and secs. 

631 and 1093 of the Senate amendment, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

GUS M. BILIRAKIS, 

ANN MARIE BUERKLE, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
572 

From the Committee on Ways and Means, for consideration of 

secs. 704, 1099A and 1225 of the House bill, and sec. 848 of 

the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

DAVE CAMP, WALLY HERGER, SANDER M. LEVIN, Managers on the Part of the House. 

CARL LEVIN, 

JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, 

JACK REED, 

DANIEL K. AKAKA, 

BEN NELSON, 

JIM WEBB, 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, 

MARK UDALL

(Except for secs. 1021 and 

1022 in subtitle D), 

KAY R. HAGAN, 

MARK BEGICH, 

JOE MANCHIN III 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, 

KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, 

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, 

JOHN MCCAIN, 

JAMES M. INHOFE, 

JEFF SESSIONS, 

SAXBY CHAMBLISS, 

ROGER F. WICKER, 

SCOTT P. BROWN, 

ROB PORTMAN, 

KELLY A. AYOTTE, 

SUSAN M. COLLINS, 

LINDSEY GRAHAM, 

JOHN CORNYN, 

DAVID VITTER, 

Managers on the Part of the Senate. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(573) 

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF 

CONFERENCE 

The managers on the part of the House and the Senate at the 

conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the 

amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1540), to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes, submit the following joint statement to the House and the Senate in 

explanation of the effect of the action agreed upon by the managers 

and recommended in the accompanying conference report: 

The Senate amendment struck all of the House bill after the 

enacting clause and inserted a substitute text. 

The House recedes from its disagreement to the amendment of 

the Senate with an amendment that is a substitute for the House 

bill and the Senate amendment. The differences between the House 

bill, the Senate amendment, and the substitute agreed to in conference are noted below, except for clerical corrections, conforming 

changes made necessary by agreements reached by the conferees, 

and minor drafting and clarifying changes. 

Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate 

regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending 

items 

Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 

Representatives and Rule XLIV(3) of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate, neither this conference report nor the accompanying joint 

statement of managers contains any congressional earmarks, congressionally directed spending items, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits, as defined in such rules. 

Explanation of funding summary 

The administration’s budget request for national defense discretionary programs within the jurisdiction of the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives for 

fiscal year 2012 was $689.0 billion. Of this amount $553.0 billion 

was requested for the base budget programs of the Department of 

Defense, $117.8 billion for overseas contingency operations, and 

$18.1 billion for national security programs in the Department of 

Energy and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. 

The agreement authorizes $662.4 billion national defense discretionary programs and includes $530.0 billion for the base budget 

of the Department of Defense, $115.5 billion for overseas contingency operations, and $16.9 billion for national security programs 

in the Department of Energy and the Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
574 

The following two tables summarize the discretionary authorizations in the agreement and the equivalent budget authority levels for fiscal year 2012 defense programs. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
575 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3261/1292 here HR329.001
576 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3261/1293 here HR329.002
577 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3261/1294 here HR329.003
578 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3261/1295 here HR329.004
579 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3261/1296 here HR329.005
580 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 101) that would authorize the recommended fiscal year 2012 funding levels for procurement for the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Defense-wide activities as specified in funding tables in section 4101. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

101). 

The conferees agree to include a provision that would authorize 

the recommended fiscal year 2012 funding levels for procurement 

for the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Defense-wide activities. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Limitation on procurement of Stryker combat vehicles (sec. 111) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 112) that would limit 

the procurement of Stryker combat vehicles to not more than 100 

until the Secretary of the Army submits written certification that 

the program has stable requirements and cost estimates. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Limitation on retirement of C–23 aircraft (sec. 112) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 111) that would: (1) 

require the Secretary of the Army to maintain at least 42 C–23 

Sherpa aircraft in inventory; and (2) prevent the Secretary from retiring any C–23 aircraft until the Director of the National Guard 

Bureau had conducted a study to determine the number of fixedwing and rotary-wing aircraft required to support a number of missions at low, medium, moderate, high, and very-high levels of operational risk, including Homeland defense and disaster response. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 137) that 

would require that, if the Secretary of Army were to retire any C– 

23 Sherpa aircraft, the Secretary would have to offer those aircraft 

to the governors of the states within whose jurisdiction the C–23s 

had been operating at no cost to the Federal Government. It would 

also allow, notwithstanding the transfer of title to an aircraft to a 

State, the National Guard of the State to fly the aircraft using National Guard crews in a State status. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would: (1) delete 

the authority for the National Guard crews in State status to operate the aircraft; and (2) add a requirement that the Secretary of 

the Air Force conduct a study to determine the number of fixedwing and rotary-wing aircraft required to support a number of missions at low, medium, moderate, high, and very-high levels of operational risk, including Homeland defense and disaster response. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
581 

Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/ 

HH–60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters 

(sec. 113) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 113) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to enter a multiyear procurement 

contract in accordance with section 2306b of title 10, United States 

Code, for up to 5 years for UH–60M/HH–60M and MH–60R/MH– 

60S helicopter airframes. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

154). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common 

cockpits for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters (sec. 121) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 123) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to enter into a multiyear contract 

to purchase mission avionics and common cockpits for Navy MH– 

60R/S helicopters, subject to the Secretary providing a certification 

that all of the criteria in section 2306b of title 10, United States 

Code, have been met. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

121). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Separate procurement line item for certain Littoral Combat Ship 

mission modules (sec. 122) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 124) that would require the Secretary of Defense ensure that the Navy budget includes a separate procurement line item for the three primary mission defense modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program: (1) 

surface warfare modules; (2) mine countermeasures modules; and 

(3) anti-submarine warfare modules. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis on alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program (sec. 

123) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 125) that would require that the Secretary of the Navy to conduct a life cycle costbenefit analysis, in accordance with the Office of Management and 

Budget Circular A–94, comparing alternative maintenance and sustainability plans for the Littoral Combat Ship program. The Secretary would be required to submit a report on that analysis to the 

congressional defense committees with the fiscal year 2013 budget 

request. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
582 

Extension of Ford-class aircraft carrier construction authority (sec. 

124) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 127) that would: (1) 

authorize the Secretary of the Navy to enter into a multiyear contract for the Ford-class aircraft carriers designated CVN–79 and 

CVN–80 and for the construction of major components, modules, or 

other structures related to such carriers; and (2) amend section 

121(a) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) to allow the Secretary to 

fund these aircraft carriers over a 5 year period. Section 121(a) now 

provides the authority for the Secretary to fund the ships over a 

4 year period (‘‘. . . in the fiscal year of the contract and the three 

succeeding fiscal years.’’). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the Secretary of the Navy to fund these aircraft carriers over a 5 

year period. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Strategic airlift aircraft force structure (sec. 131) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 136) that 

would amend section 8062(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, to 

reduce the number of strategic airlift aircraft the Air Force must 

maintain from 316 aircraft to 301 aircraft. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Limitations on the use of funds to retire B–1 bomber aircraft (sec. 

132) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 131) that would prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from retiring six B–1 bomber 

aircraft until January 1, 2018, and would identify minimum inventory levels for combat coded, primary, back-up and attrition reserve 

aircraft. 

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 134) that would prevent the Secretary of the Air Force from retiring any B–1 bomber 

aircraft until the Secretary submitted a modernization plan to the 

congressional defense committees. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary to submit a B–1 modernization plan and would authorize 

the retirement of six B–1 bomber aircraft as follows: three training 

aircraft in fiscal year 2012, one combat-coded aircraft in fiscal year 

2014, one combat-coded aircraft in fiscal year 2015, and one combat-coded aircraft in fiscal year 2016. 

The conferees expect the Secretary of the Air Force to maintain 

non-retired B–1 aircraft in a condition that addresses Congressional intent of having a remaining fleet of 60 B–1 aircraft prepared to meet warfighting plans of the combatant commanders. 

Limitation on retirement of U–2 aircraft (sec. 133) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 135) that 

would prohibit the retirement of the U–2 aircraft until the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
583 

(USD(AT&L)) certifies that the operating and sustainment (O&S) 

costs for the Global Hawk are less than the O&S costs for the U– 

2 on a comparable flight-hour cost basis. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would add an additional limitation, requiring that the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council certify that the capability to be fielded at the same time or before the U–2 aircraft retirement would 

result in equal or greater capability available to the combatant 

commanders. 

The USD (AT&L) certification in June, 2011, pursuant to the 

Global Hawk Nunn-McCurdy cost breach (section 2433a of title 10, 

United States Code), noted that the U–2 is less expensive to operate on a flight hour basis, but pointed out that, because the Global 

Hawk has greater endurance than the U–2, fewer sorties are required to fulfill requirements, such that the Global Hawk is less expensive in terms of a full mission profile. The conferees acknowledge this advantage, but believe that flight hour cost is a relevant 

metric that should favor the more modern, unmanned platform. 

The conferees are concerned about Department of Defense 

(DOD) transition plans in U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM). The U– 

2 has been operated basically as a dedicated asset to support U.S. 

Forces Korea and Combined Forces Command, but the Global 

Hawks that are slated to replace them will be operated as a 

PACOM-wide asset, substantially reducing collection on the Korean 

Peninsula. 

Global Hawk’s imaging sensors also have substantially less 

range than the Senior Year Electro-optical Reconnaissance System 

(SYERS) and the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System II 

carried by the U–2. In the high-threat Korean Peninsula, this 

range disadvantage equates to reduced coverage and/or increased 

risk from operating at reduced standoff ranges. The conferees are 

informed that the Air Force is considering development of a 

SYERS-like electro-optical imaging system that would fit in the 

Global Hawk. While this initiative is welcome, it may be years before it is available, and does not address the gap in radar performance. 

DOD hoped that a Foreign Military Sale to South Korea of a 

number of Global Hawks would mitigate the gap in coverage created by DOD’s Global Hawk transition plan in PACOM. This sale 

appears to have stalled, however. The conferees intend to assess 

whether the risk of a gap in intelligence collection in Korea is significant and to examine alternatives. 

Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds for research and development 

relating to the B–2 bomber aircraft (sec. 134) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 132) that 

would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to use up to $20.0 

million in prior year balances available in the B–2 bomber program 

in Aircraft Procurement and not needed for low observable signature and supportability modifications and trainer system upgrades, 

to continue the modifications necessary to allow the B–2 to carry 

a mix of conventional rotary launcher assembly and smart bomb 

rack assembly conventional weapons from a single aircraft. This efVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00613 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
584 

fort was started in fiscal year 2011, is funded in the future-years 

defense program, but is not funded in the fiscal year 2012 budget 

request. This provision would authorize the Secretary of the Air 

Force to use funds already in the B–2 program budget to continue 

the mixed load modifications. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would change 

‘‘shall be available’’ to ‘‘may be available’’. 

Availability of fiscal year 2011 funds to support alternative options 

for extremely high frequency terminal Increment 1 program of 

record (sec. 135) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 133) that 

would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to use up to $15.0 

million in prior year balances available in the B–2 bomber program 

in Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (APAF), and not needed for low 

observable signature and supportability modifications and trainer 

system upgrades, to continue to explore alternatives to the Increment 1 Extremely High Frequency (EHF) terminal program of 

record. The provision would authorize the Secretary to use these 

funds as part of the EHF terminal program which is funded in 

APAF line 76. The EHF terminal will be used in the B–2 and other 

aircraft. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would change 

‘‘$15,000,000 shall be available’’ to ‘‘$15,000,000 may be available’’. 

Procurement of advanced extremely high frequency satellites (sec. 

136) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 132) that would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into a fixed price 

contract to procure two Advanced Extremely High Frequency 

(AEHF) satellites, authorize incremental funding of the two AEHF 

satellites over a period not to exceed 5 years, and establish a limitation on the total funds to be obligated and expended for the procurement. This section would also require the Secretary of the Air 

Force to submit a report to the congressional defense committees 

on contract details, cost savings, and plans for reinvesting the cost 

savings into capability improvements for future blocks of AEHF 

satellites. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

131). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

a 6 year period and a sense of Congress that the Secretary should 

not enter into a fixed-price contract under subsection (a) for the 

procurement of two advanced extremely high frequency satellites 

unless the Secretary determines that entering into such a contract 

will save the Air Force not less than 20 percent over the cost of 

procuring two such satellites separately. 

The conferees do not support the request for advanced appropriations authority and note that such authority has not been provided to the Department in the past and would limit the oversight 

ability of future Congresses. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
585 

Subtitle E—Joint and Multiservice Matters 

Limitation on availability of funds for acquisition of joint tactical 

radio system (sec. 141) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 143) that would limit 

the obligation of funds of the Joint Tactical Radio System to not 

more than 70 percent of the requested amount until the Secretary 

of the Army submits written certification that full rate production 

includes full and open competition. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Limitation on availability of funds for aviation foreign internal defense program (sec. 142) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 144) that would prohibit more than 50 percent of the funds available in fiscal year 

2012 for the procurement of fixed-wing non-standard aviation aircraft in support of the aviation foreign internal defense program 

from being obligated or expended until 30 days after the Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command submits a required 

report on the aviation foreign internal defense program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would clarify the 

elements of the required report. 

F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft (sec. 143) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 152) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that, in entering 

into a contract for the fifth low-rate initial production (LRIP) contract lot for the F–35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) aircraft: (1) the contract is a fixed price contract; and (2) the contract 

requires the contractor to assume full responsibility for costs under 

the contract above the target cost specified in the contract. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would modify the 

provision to make the requirement apply to the sixth and all subsequent low-rate initial production contracts. 

Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command (sec. 144) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 155) that 

would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics to designate the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command 

as a major defense acquisition program. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to make an assessment and determination, prior to any milestone B acquisition decision, on whether to treat the Dry Combat 

Submersible-Light, Dry Combat Submersible-Medium, Next-Generation Submarine Shelter, and any other future dry combat submersible programs of the United States Special Operations ComVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00615 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
586 

mand, as major defense acquisition programs. The Under Secretary 

of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics will include in 

his assessment a requirements validation by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, an independent cost estimate prepared 

by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, a test 

and evaluation master plan reviewed by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, and a technology readiness assessment reviewed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research 

and Engineering. At least 30 days prior to any milestone B acquisition decision on the programs listed above, the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall provide to 

the congressional defense committees his determination of the appropriate acquisition category for these programs, including the 

validated requirements, independent cost estimate, test and evaluation master plan, and technology readiness assessment. 

Inclusion of information on approved Combat Mission Requirements 

in quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirement 

Funds (sec. 145) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 151) that 

would clarify the quarterly reporting requirements related to the 

use of Combat Mission Requirement Funds. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft re-engining 

program (sec. 146) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 157) that 

would require: (1) the Air Force Audit Agency to submit to the congressional defense committees the results of a financial audit of the 

funds previously authorized and appropriated for the Joint Surveillance/Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) aircraft re-engining 

program; and (2) the Secretary of the Air Force to ensure that any 

funds described authorized and appropriated for the JSTARS reengining program are obligated and expended for the purpose for 

which originally authorized and appropriated, including, but not 

limited to, the installation of two engine ship sets on two operational JSTARS aircraft and the purchase of two spare engines. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would change the 

requirement to install one engine ship set to be installed on one 

operational JSTARS aircraft. 

Authority for exchange with United Kingdom of specified F–35 

Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft (sec. 147) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 159) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to exchange an F–35B 

short take-off and vertical landing aircraft to the United Kingdom 

in exchange for an F–35C carrier variant aircraft. This exchange 

became desirable when the United Kingdom announced that they 

were not intending to continue any participation in the F–35B program, but had decided instead to pursue the F–35C variant. The 

provision would place certain terms and conditions on the exchange 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
587 

to ensure that the each government gets fair value in the transaction. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on probationary period in development of short take-off, 

vertical landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter (sec. 148) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 158) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees about the criteria that the Secretary determines must be satisfied before the F–35B Joint Strike 

Fighter can be removed from the 2 year probationary status imposed by the Secretary on or about January 6, 2011, and several 

other matters. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on plan to implement Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 

Act of 2009 measures within the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft 

program (sec. 149) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 153) that 

would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics to submit a report on the plans of the 

Department of Defense to implement the requirements of the 

Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111– 

23), and the amendments made by that Act, within the Joint Strike 

Fighter aircraft program. The provision would require that the 

Under Secretary submit a report with the budget request for fiscal 

year 2013. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA replacement ship designated LHA–7 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 121) that would 

amend section 111(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to allow the 

Navy to fund detail design and construction for LHA–7 in fiscal 

year 2013, in addition to fiscal years 2011 and 2012, as was originally authorized by section 111(a). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Multiyear funding for procurement of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 122) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to enter into a multiyear contract 

for the DDG–51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and governmentfurnished equipment associated with such destroyers. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
588 

Limitation on availability of funds for F/A–18 service life extension 

program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 126) that would prevent the Secretary of the Navy from spending any funds on a program to extend the service life beyond 8,600 hours pending submission of that required report. The Navy submitted the required report after the House of Representatives passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (H.R. 1540). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capabilities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 142) that would repeal section 127 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees agree that commercial imaging satellites are a 

key part of the overhead imagery architecture, and the related legislation should not be overly prescriptive. The executive agencies 

should reach consensus on capability requirements and allow commercial imagery service providers to offer the best value solutions 

that meet the needs of the government. The conferees look forward 

to the executive agencies further identification of the role(s) and requirements of commercial imagery, specifically in the context of a 

broader intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance strategy. The 

conferees plan to actively monitor this important area and consider 

the need for additional legislation and existing statute. 

Limitation on availability of funds for commercial satellite procurement 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 145) that would prohibit the Defense Information Systems Agency and the Air Force 

from obligating more than 20 percent of the funds available for fiscal year 2012 for commercial satellite procurement until the Secretary of Defense provides an independent assessment of the acquisition strategy. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Separate procurement line item for non-lethal weapons funding 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 147) that would require future budget requests to include a separate procurement 

line item for each military department for non-lethal weapons. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Study on domestic capacity for manufacture of ship shafts and 

other forged components 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 148) that would require the Secretary of Defense to measure the domestic capacity to 

manufacture ship shafts and other forged components used by 

Navy combatants. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
589 

The House recedes. 

The conferees understand that the Department is already conducting a review that will produce such a measurement of industry 

capacity. 

Transfer of Air Force C–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and 

Reconnaissance Aircraft to the Army 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 156) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement 

a plan for the orderly transfer of the Air Force MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft to the 

Army. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The Senate based this position on the view that: (1) the Department of Defense (DOD) does not need two fleets of C–12-based 

ISR aircraft equipped with full-motion video and tactical signals intelligence sensors supporting ground forces (the MC–12 Liberty in 

the Air Force and the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance 

and Surveillance System (EMARSS) in the Army); (2) the Army is 

more likely than the Air Force to maintain a commitment to this 

type of platform and mission; (3) the Army has an existing and 

available pool of C–12 pilots and infrastructure; and (4) the Air 

Force has a shortage of pilots for its rapidly growing unmanned 

aerial vehicle fleet. 

The DOD leadership, including the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)), and the Secretaries 

of the Air Force and Army, informed the conferees that they all believe that the Air Force should continue to operate and manage the 

MC–12 Liberty fleet and assured the conferees that the Air Force 

is committed to the mission. 

The conferees accept DOD’s judgment, but note that other actions within the Department send mixed signals about the conclusions these officials have reached. 

The conferees understand that the Air Force has already proposed to transfer the Liberty aircraft to the Air National Guard, 

despite assurances to the conferees from the USD(I) that this 

would not be allowed to happen. The conferees have concerns about 

the ability of the Air National Guard to sustain the levels of forward deployment and operational tempo required to meet the 

needs of Army, Marine Corps, and special forces ground units. The 

conferees are not opposed to having the Air National Guard contribute to this mission by operating at least a portion of these assets as the demand for high levels of forward deployment recedes. 

However, that level of participation should be consistent with meeting the demands of the combatant commanders, when considering 

the strains in operating tempo that would be placed on the Air National Guard force. The conferees urge the Department, in making 

any decision on transfers of this mission and aircraft to the Guard, 

to consider requirements for aircraft of this type to assist in border 

control and counternarcotics operations. 

The conferees expect that the decision to keep the Liberty aircraft in the Air Force as a theater-level asset would be reflected in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
590 

a commitment by the combatant commanders to follow established 

allocation procedures through the Joint Forces Air Component 

Commander process in supporting deployed joint forces, obviating 

the need for a second fleet of EMARSS aircraft in the Army. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

BUDGET ITEM

Armored multipurpose vehicle program 

The budget request included $53.3 million in PE 23735A for 

combat vehicle improvement. Of this amount, $31.4 million was requested for the Armored Multipurpose Vehicle (AMPV) program. 

The House bill would authorize $78.3 million in PE 23735A, an 

increase of $25.0 million. 

The Senate amendment would authorize $53.3 million in PE 

23735A for combat vehicle improvement. 

The House recedes. The conferees strongly support the AMPV 

program moving forward as quickly as possible. The conferees note 

that in 2007 the Army identified the M–113 Armored Personnel 

Carrier for replacement due to its inadequate survivability and 

force protection. As currently planned, the AMPV’s low-rate initial 

production will not occur until 2016. The conferees believe that this 

timeline is too long and that numerous options exist to accelerate 

the replacement of M–113s such as modified versions of existing 

Army tracked or wheeled vehicle systems. The conferees are concerned, however, that production of many of the Army’s current 

tracked and wheeled combat vehicles will end before 2016. Therefore, the conferees urge the Army to carefully consider competitive 

selection from modified existing armored vehicle systems to control 

costs and avoid delay in development, testing, production, and 

fielding of an M–113 replacement vehicle. As part of this competitive selection, the conferees encourage the Army to consider the use 

of existing acquisition authorities to begin this M–113 replacement 

effort as an engineering change proposal or upgrade program, if 

that approach reduces cost, and shortens the development and testing timelines. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 201) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation. 

The Senate bill contained an identical provision (sec. 201). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Limitation on availability of funds for the ground combat vehicle 

program (sec. 211) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 211) that would limit 

obligation or expenditure of funds to not more than 70 percent for 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
591 

the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program until the Army provides a report containing an updated analysis of alternatives. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

obligation or expenditure of funds to not more than 80 percent for 

the program until submission of a report containing the Army’s 

plans to carry out a dynamic analysis of alternatives and a description of the resources needed to conduct a separate assessment of 

selected non-developmental vehicles in accordance with the acquisition decision memorandum dated August 17, 2011. 

The conferees continue to support the Army’s goal of pursuing 

a modernized combat vehicle. However, before the Army starts another major development program that could cost $30.0 to $40.0 

billion, the conferees want assurances that the GCV will be significantly more capable than a potentially less expensive upgraded 

version of currently fielded platforms. The conferees agree with the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics directive for the Army to conduct a dynamic analysis of alternatives and separate assessment of selected non-developmental vehicles. The conferees are concerned about the differences between 

the Army’s and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation’s unit cost estimates and expect these differences to be resolved during the technology development phase of the program. 

Limitation on the individual carbine program (sec. 212) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 212) that would require the Army to conduct an analysis of alternatives (AOA) for the 

Individual Carbine program and prohibit the approval of a full rate 

production decision until the AOA has been reported. The provision 

would also give the Secretary of Defense waiver authority. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require a 

business case analysis instead of an AOA and modify the Secretary 

of Defense’s waiver authority. 

Limitation on availability of funds for future unmanned carrierbased strike system (sec. 213) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 223) that would prevent the Secretary of Defense from obligating more than 15 percent 

of the fiscal year 2012 program funds for the unmanned carrier 

launched airborne surveillance and strike (UCLASS) program until 

the Department made certain certifications and established acquisition baselines for the program. The provision would also require 

the Comptroller General to assess the acquisition strategy defined 

by the Department as part of that effort, and to report to the congressional defense committees on that assessment. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 213) that 

that would prevent the Secretary of Defense from obligating more 

than 50 percent of the UCLASS program funds until Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to the congressional defense committees that the acquisition 

strategy he approved at Milestone A requires implementation of 

open architecture standards for the program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
592 

The conferees agree to a provision that would prevent the 

Navy from obligating more than 75 percent of the funds available 

to the program until 60 days after the date on which: (1) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council makes certain 

certifications about requirements; (2) the Assistant Secretary of the 

Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition submits a report 

describing certain acquisition program attributes; and (3) the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies certain aspects of the program plan. 

Limitation on availability of funds for amphibious assault vehicles 

of the Marine Corps (sec. 214) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 214) that would prohibit the obligation of funds made available after the enactment of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 for 

Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles until the Secretary of 

the Navy provided Congress a report on requirements and an analysis of alternatives (AoA) for amphibious assault vehicles. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 214) 

that would prohibit Milestone B approval of the Marine Personnel 

Carrier (MPC) until the AoA is submitted to Congress; allow the 

Marine Corps to obligate funds for amphibious assault vehicle research and development, and testing, necessary to support the AoA 

and the development of requirements for the Amphibious Combat 

Vehicle (ACV); and require the Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, to conduct life cycle cost assessments of the portfolio of Marine Corps ground vehicles prior to Milestone B approval. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would (1) allow 

the Marine Corps to obligate funds for amphibious assault vehicle 

activities to support survivability or other operational issues, to 

support the AoA, or to support the development of requirements for 

the ACV; (2) allow the Marine Corps to obligate funds for amphibious vehicles for other purposes after submitting a report to Congress on combatant commanders’ requirements for amphibious assault vehicles; (3) prohibit Milestone B approval for the MPC until 

the requirements report is submitted to Congress; and (4) require 

a habitability assessment report based on ongoing Marine Corps 

evaluations. 

Limitation on obligation of funds for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft 

program (sec. 215) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 215) that would prohibit obligation or expenditure of any funds for performance improvements to the F–35 propulsion system unless the Secretary of 

Defense ensures competitive development and production of the F– 

35 propulsion system. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would prevent 

the obligation of more than 80 percent of the research and development funding for the F–35 program until the Secretary of Defense 

certifies to the congressional defense committees that the acquisition strategy for the F–35 program includes a plan for achieving 

competition throughout operation and sustainment, in accordance 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
593 

with section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act 

of 2009 (Public Law 111–23). 

Limitation on use of funds for Increment 2 of B–2 bomber aircraft 

extremely high frequency satellite communications program 

(sec. 216) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 212) that 

would prohibit the Secretary from obligating or expending funds for 

Increment 2 of the B–2 Bomber aircraft Extremely High Frequency 

(EHF) Satellite Communications program, until the Secretary of 

the Air Force makes a series of certifications and a report with respect to the acquisition plan for Increment 2, which consists of the 

integration of an EHF terminal and low observable antenna for secure strategic communications. The required certifications would be 

that the U.S. Government owns the data rights for the antennas, 

and that the antenna technology selected is the most cost effective 

and lowest risk option for the B–2. The report would include a detailed plan setting forth the projected cost and schedule for the research, development, and testing of the antenna. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would prohibit 

spending 60 percent of funds available until the Secretary of the 

Air Force makes the above certification. 

Limitation on availability of funds for the Joint Space Operations 

Center management system (sec. 217) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 217) that would limit 

the obligation or expenditure of funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for Release 

1 of the Joint Space Operations Center Management System (JMS) 

until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics and the Secretary of the Air Force jointly provide to 

the congressional defense committees the acquisition strategy for 

JMS, to include a description of the acquisition policies and procedures applicable to JMS and any additional acquisition authorities 

that may be necessary. 

This section would also express a sense of Congress that improvements to U.S. space situational awareness and space command and control capabilities are necessary, and the traditional defense acquisition process is not optimal for developing the services 

oriented architecture and net-centric environment planned for 

JMS. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Limitation on availability of funds for wireless innovation fund (sec. 

218) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 218) that would limit 

the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to obligating or expending not more than 10 percent of funds authorized to be appropriated for the wireless innovation fund until 30 days after the 

date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics submits a report on how such funds will 

be managed and executed. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
594 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Prohibition on delegation of budgeting authority for certain research 

and educational programs (sec. 219) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 222) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from delegating authority for the 

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) program to 

any individual outside of the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees direct that any amounts appropriated for the 

HBCU/Minority Institutions program, in a program element other 

than PE 0602228087, shall be transferred to this program element 

for execution consistent with the requirements of this section. 

Designation of main propulsion turbomachinery of the next-generation long-range strike bomber aircraft as major subprogram 

(sec. 220) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 220) that would require the Secretary of Defense to designate the main propulsion 

system of the next-generation long-range strike bomber aircraft as 

a major subprogram and would require the Secretary of the Air 

Force to develop a competitive acquisition strategy for the propulsion system. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that changes ‘‘system’’ 

to ‘‘turbomachinery’’ and the designation date to ‘‘30 days after 

Milestone A’’. 

Designation of electromagnetic aircraft launch system development 

and procurement program as major subprogram (sec. 221) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 221) that would require that the Secretary of Defense designate the electromagnetic 

aircraft launch system (EMALS) development and procurement 

program as a major subprogram of the CVN–78 Ford-class aircraft 

carrier major defense acquisition program, in accordance with section 2430a of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would provide 

that the requirement to maintain this major subprogram designation for EMALS would expire upon successful completion of operation testing. 

Advanced rotorcraft flight research and development (sec. 222) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 219) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to conduct a program for flight 

research and demonstration of advanced helicopter technology. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would direct the 

Army, if they chose to award a contract, to use full and open competition as defined in section 2302(3)(D) of title 10, United States 

Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
595 

Preservation and storage of certain property related to F136 propulsion system (sec. 223) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 252) that would require the Secretary of Defense develop and implement a plan to 

store and preserve property owned by the Federal Government that 

was acquired under the F136 propulsion system development contract that would, with the aim of ensuring that the option of allowing the contractor to fund continued development of the F136 from 

within contactor funds would not be precluded by actions that the 

Defense Department might take in implementing the announced 

contract termination. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require 

that the Secretary of Defense develop a plan that would provide for 

the long-term sustainment and repair of such property pending a 

determination of whether such property: (1) can be used within the 

F–35 Lightning II aircraft program, in other government development programs, or in other contractor-funded development activities; (2) should be stored for use in future government development 

programs; or (3) should be disposed. The provision would also require the Secretary to identify how he intends to obtain maximum 

benefit to the U.S. Government from the investment already made 

in developing the F136. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense 

system (sec. 231) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 231) that would 

amend chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, to require acquisition baselines and annual acquisition accountability reports on the 

ballistic missile defense system. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Comptroller General review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs (sec. 232) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 231) that 

would amend section 225 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to require the Comptroller General to review and assess the annual 

baseline acquisition reports of the Missile Defense Agency for fiscal 

years 2012 through 2015, and provide annual reports to Congress 

on those assessments. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would make this 

a separate provision of law, since section 225 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 is repealed elsewhere in this Act. 

Homeland defense hedging policy and strategy (sec. 233) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 233) that would establish policy for a hedging strategy for homeland missile defense 

of the United States, and would require the Department of Defense 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
596 

to develop and submit such a hedging strategy to the congressional 

defense committees. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

234). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Department of Defense to submit a report on the homeland missile 

defense hedging strategy. 

Ground-based Midcourse Defense program (sec. 234) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 234) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the need to take steps to correct the cause of two flight test failures of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, and would require the Department of Defense to establish and submit to Congress a plan to address the 

flight test failures. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

232). 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Department of Defense to report to Congress on the details and 

status of the plan to correct the cause of the flight test failures. 

Limitation on availability of funds for the Medium Extended Air 

Defense System (sec. 235) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 232) that would limit 

the availability of any funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) until the Secretary 

of Defense either (1) negotiates a multilateral termination of the 

contract covering the program, or (2) restructures the program to 

ensure that specific deliverables under the contract are 

transitioned to United States programs of record by not later than 

September 30, 2013. The provision would also require the Secretary to submit notification of the details of the plan to meet either of the options permitted. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. However, the Senate amendment did include a provision (sec. 807) that 

would require the Department of Defense to conduct risk assessments of future international weapon development programs, to 

avoid problems such as the current MEADS situation. Furthermore, the Senate amendment would authorize no fiscal year 2012 

funds for the MEADS program. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

availability of more than 25 percent of fiscal year 2012 funds for 

MEADS until the Secretary of Defense submits a plan to use such 

funds as final obligations under the MEADS program for either (1) 

implementing a restructured MEADS program of reduced scope, or 

(2) contract termination liability costs with respect to the contracts 

covering the program. The provision would also require the Secretary to submit the plan for using fiscal year 2012 funds for the 

purposes permitted, with details of such plan. The provision would 

also require the Secretary to submit a report, not later than 180 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, describing the efforts 

the Secretary has made with Germany and Italy, including involvement by the Secretary of State, to agree on ways to minimize the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
597 

costs to each nation of implementing a restructured program or of 

unilateral or multilateral contract termination. 

The conferees are extremely disappointed that in 2004 the Department of Defense negotiated and signed a Memorandum of Understanding on the Medium Extended Air Defense System with 

Germany and Italy that effectively created an unacceptable situation for the United States in the event of poor program execution, 

significant schedule delays, or significantly increased cost estimates, such as have taken place. It is the conferees’ understanding 

that none of the partner nations—the United States, Germany, or 

Italy—intend to procure and field the MEADS system. Yet, Congress has been told that the United States still must face an obligation of more than $800.0 million for contract completion or for contract termination liability in the context of our fiscal crisis. 

The conferees believe the Department of Defense failed the 

American taxpayer by signing the Memorandum in question, and 

believe that it is the Department’s urgent responsibility, at the 

highest levels, to engage with Germany and Italy to minimize possible further costs to the United States of implementing a restructured program or multilateral contract termination. 

Sense of Congress regarding ballistic missile defense training (sec. 

236) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 333) that would express the sense of Congress concerning the importance of improving the integration of ballistic missile defense training across and 

between the combatant commands. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Extension of requirements for biennial roadmap and annual review 

and certification on funding for development of hypersonics 

(sec. 241) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 251) that 

would extend the biennial reporting requirement from the Department of Defense on hypersonic weapons development from 2012 to 

2020. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

reporting requirement from 2012 to 2016. 

Report and cost assessment of options for Ohio-class replacement 

ballistic missile submarine (sec. 242) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 213) that contained 

a series of findings and expressed a sense of Congress on the program to replace the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine. The 

House provision would also limit, to not more than 90 percent, the 

obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2012 funds authorized or 

otherwise made available for such program until the Secretary of 

Defense submits a report to the congressional defense committees 

on the program including, among other matters, the analysis and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
598 

cost estimates that supported the Department of Defense decision 

to reduce the planned number of missile tubes per submarine to 16. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of the Navy and the Commander of U.S. Strategic Command to jointly submit a report, not later than 180 days after the 

date of enactment of this Act, assessing several options for the 

number of submarines and the number of missile tubes per submarine for the Ohio-class replacement program. The report would 

be required to assess the procurement cost and total life cycle cost 

of each option, the ability for each option to meet Strategic Command’s at-sea requirements that are in place as of the date of enactment of this Act and any expected changes to such requirements, and the ability for each option to meet nuclear employment 

and planning guidance in place as of the date of enactment of this 

Act and any expected changes to such guidance. The report would 

also be required to include a description of the postulated threat 

and strategic environment used to inform selection of a final option, as well as how each option provides flexibility for responding 

to changes in the threat and strategic environment. 

Report on the electromagnetic rail gun system (sec. 243) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 243) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the feasibility 

of developing and deploying the electromagnetic rail gun system. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would change the 

reporting authority to the Secretary of the Navy, focusing on development, future deployment, and operational challenges within the 

Navy program. The Secretary of the Navy would be required to 

brief the congressional defense committees with an interim update 

within 90 days of enactment of this Act, and a full report within 

180 days. 

Annual Comptroller General report on the KC–46A aircraft acquisition program (sec. 244) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 241) that would require the Comptroller General to submit an annual report on the 

KC–46A program, beginning in fiscal year 2012 and concluding in 

fiscal year 2017. The reports would include assessment of various 

aspects of the program, including whether the Air Force was making any changes to the program’s requirements or documentation. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Independent review and assessment of cryptographic modernization 

program (sec. 245) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 242) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an independent review 

through an appropriate entity outside of the Department of Defense (DOD) of the DOD cryptographic modernization program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
599 

Report on increased budget items (sec. 246) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1699F–1) that would 

require reports on increased budget items authorized to be appropriated by section 201 of this Act. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

require a one-time report. The conferees intend the Secretary of 

Defense to describe the justification for awarding a contract using 

other than full and open competition, in the case of contracts 

against which funds will be obligated that were not included in the 

President’s fiscal year 2012 budget request. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Repeal of requirement for Technology Transition Initiative (sec. 251) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 251) that would repeal the requirement for the Technology Transition Initiative. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would make the 

repeal effective on October 1, 2013. 

Further, the conferees note that the repeal of the Technology 

Transition Initiative is incumbent upon the receipt, no later than 

March 31, 2012, of the report directed in section 253 of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 

(Public Law 110–417). The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics has failed to comply with this statutory requirement, which was required no later than October 1, 

2009. 

Contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems (sec. 252) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 261) that 

would require the contractor of certain research and development 

programs to bear at least one half of the cost of such activities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Extension of authority for mechanisms to provide funds for defense 

laboratories for research and development of technologies for 

military missions (sec. 253) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 253) that would extend the authority for funding mechanisms from October 1, 2013, 

till September 30, 2016. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

905(b)) that would make the authority permanent. 

The Senate recedes. 

However, conferees remain concerned about the Department of 

Defense’s execution of section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110– 

417). The statute requires the establishment of mechanisms under 

which the director of a defense laboratory may use an amount of 

funds equal to not more than 3 percent of all funds available to the 

defense laboratory for specified purposes. Current implementation 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
600 

varies from service to service and the conferees expect the Department and the services to establish consistent mechanisms that 

clearly follow the provisions of this statute. Furthermore, the conferees direct the service secretaries, in coordination with the Director of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Laboratories Office, to report to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives by March 

31, 2012, on all barriers or impediments to fully implementing the 

statute. 

National defense education program (sec. 254) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 257) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using K–12 education funds 

within the National Defense Education Program (NDEP) to make 

up the difference should the amount authorized to be appropriated 

for fiscal year 2012 be less than the amount requested by the President. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees strongly encourage the Department that however it allocates non-K–12 funding within NDEP, existing Science, 

Mathematics and Research for Transformation scholarships and internships should not be impacted. 

Laboratory facilities, Hanover, New Hampshire (sec. 255) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 262) that 

would allow the Secretary of the Army to acquire property in the 

vicinity of Hanover, New Hampshire, as may be needed for the Engineer Research and Development Center laboratory at the Cold 

Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress on active matrix organic light emitting diode 

technology (sec. 256) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 255) that would establish a sense of Congress on the importance of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology. The provision urges the Secretary of 

Defense to utilize existing programs to support the reduction of 

costs and risks related to the technology. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment that would 

change this provision from being directive to permissive. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Study on space-based interceptor technology 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 235) that would require the Department of Defense to conduct a study of space-based 

interceptor technology. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
601 

Application of RNA biological and functional science and technology 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 254) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that RNA technology 

would be used, when applicable, in research. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on use of funds for newly designed flight suit 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 256) that would prohibit the Department from using any funds to research, develop, 

manufacture, or procure a newly designed flight suit for members 

of the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibitions relating to use of funds for research, development, test, 

and evaluation on the F136 engine 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 211) that 

would prohibit: (1) the obligation of any funds in this Act for research, development, test, or evaluation on the F136 engine; and 

(2) the consideration of any research, development, testing and 

evaluation of the F136 engine conducted and funded by the contractor as an allowable charge on any future government contract, 

either as a direct or an indirect cost. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 301) that would authorize fiscal year 2012 funding levels for all operation and maintenance accounts. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

301). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 

Designation of senior official of Joint Chiefs of Staff for operational 

energy plans and programs and operational energy budget certification (sec. 311) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 311) that would require the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to designate a senior official to be responsible for operational energy plans and programs for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Staff, and for coordinating with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs and implementing initiatives pursuant 

to the operational energy strategy established by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs. 

The provision would also modify the date of the report requirement 

accompanying the President’s budget certification. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
602 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Improved Sikes Act coverage of State-owned facilities used for the 

national defense (sec. 312) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 313) that would improve the coverage of State-owned National Guard facilities under 

the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670 et seq.) and would make certain technical modifications. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Discharge of wastes at sea generated by ships of the armed forces 

(sec. 313) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 314) that would 

amend section 1902 of title 33, United States Code, by codifying 

discharge standards at sea for ships of the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

315). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that eliminates the 

270 day deadline for the reporting of a discharge necessary for purposes of securing the safety of the ship, the health of the ship’s personnel, or saving life at sea. 

Modification to the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs (sec. 314) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 315) that would designate one of the military departments to serve as the executive 

agent for alternative fuel development for the Department of Defense (DOD). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

modify the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Operational Energy, Plans, and Programs, in consultation with the 

military departments and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Research and Engineering, to include development and oversight of 

alternative fuels activities and the streamlining of alternative fuel 

investments. 

The conferees note that the amendment would also include a 

modification to the reporting requirement set forth in section 

2925(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code. 

Energy-efficient technologies in contracts for logistics support of contingency operations (sec. 315) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 316) that would require the Secretary of Defense to give favorable consideration in 

the award of logistics support contracts for contingency operations 

to offers that include energy-efficient or energy reduction technologies or processes. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

energy performance master plan for the Department of Defense to 

include goals, metrics, and incentives for achieving energy efficiency in such contracts. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
603 

Health assessment reports required when waste is disposed of in 

open-air burn pits (sec. 316) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 317) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a health assessment report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives when certain waste is disposed of in 

open-air burn pits during contingency operations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Streamlined annual report on defense environmental programs (sec. 

317) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 312) that 

would streamline the Defense Department’s Annual Report to Congress on Defense Environmental Programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment that the report would cover fiscal years vice calendar years, and to reference 

the ‘‘environmental restoration program’’ instead of the ‘‘installation restoration program.’’ 

The conferees note that the Office of the Secretary of Defense 

and the military departments present their environmental account 

information to the defense committees in varying formats. It is the 

intention of the conferees that this streamlined report will include 

the total funds expended by account by the Department of Defense 

and by each military department. It is also the intention that the 

Defense Department use consistent nomenclature and metrics 

when reporting its environmental data to ensure that the defense 

committees can exercise proper oversight of the environmental program funding. 

Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties 

in connection with Jackson Park Housing Complex, Washington 

(sec. 318) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 313) that 

would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to pay a stipulated penalty to the Environmental Protection Agency. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Requirements relating to Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry investigation of exposure to drinking water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina (sec. 319) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 314) that 

would establish certain requirements relating to actions associated 

with the ongoing investigation and study of exposures to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Fire suppression agents (sec. 320) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 318) that would 

amend section 7671d(a) of title 42, United States Code, to allow the 

use of certain fire suppression agents under certain circumstances. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
604 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1089). 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Definition of depot-level maintenance and repair (sec. 321) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 321) that would 

modify and clarify the definition of depot-level maintenance and repair. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the study on the future capability of 

the Department of Defense maintenance depots directed by section 

322 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417) found that the existing 

statutory definition was ambiguous and subject to interpretation. 

The conferees are concerned that these ambiguities are directly affecting the development of core depot maintenance capabilities and 

allocation of sustaining workloads. To resolve these ambiguities, 

the conferees specifically addressed in the provision the depot-level 

maintenance of software and the installation of modifications or 

upgrades. The conferees have removed exceptions from the definition and have addressed that issue more appropriately in the core 

depot-maintenance capability provision provided for elsewhere in 

this Act. 

Designation of military arsenal facilities as Centers of Industrial 

and Technical Excellence (sec. 322) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 323) that would 

amend 10 U.S.C. 2474 by allowing military industrial facilities to 

be designated as Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence 

(CITE). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

323). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

ensure that Army arsenals are designated as CITE. 

Permanent and expanded authority for Army industrial facilities to 

enter into certain cooperative arrangements with non-Army entities (sec. 323) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 325) that would give 

permanent and expanded authority to the Secretary of the Army to 

enter into certain cooperative arrangements with non-Army entities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 341) 

that would increase the limit of cooperative arrangements and expand the expiration clause. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that 10 U.S.C. 4544 is the appropriate 

partnering authority for cooperative arrangements with non-Army 

entities. The conferees further note that the Secretary of the Army 

shall evaluate all cooperative arrangements previously entered into 

under the Arsenal Support Program Initiative to determine which, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
605 

if any, cooperative arrangements should be continued and transferred under the appropriate authority of 10 U.S.C. 4544. 

Implementation of corrective actions resulting from corrosion study 

of the F–22 and F–35 aircraft (sec. 324) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 327) that would require the Department of Defense (DOD) to implement the recommendations of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 

study of the F–22 Raptor and F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft or 

submit to Congress a written justification for any decision not to 

do so. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

825). 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that language from the Senate provision requiring DOD to address corrosion issues at the time of milestone 

decisions is addressed in a separate provision of the bill. 

The GAO study found that the DOD had not adequately addressed the problem of corrosion and resulting material degradation in the design, development, and testing of these weapon systems. The conferees agree that renewed focus in the area of corrosion prevention and mitigation, with the active participation of the 

Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight, is needed to address 

material degradation issues that can significantly impact the affordability and sustainability of a major weapon systems over its 

entire service life. 

In addressing the recommendations of the GAO report, the 

conferees expect the Department to specifically address the following issues: (1) with regard to the F–22 Raptor program, the 

need for a plan to manage cumulative corrosion damage in order 

to mitigate long-term structure risk to the aircraft; and (2) with regard to the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter program, the need for an update to the F–35 Corrosion Prevention and Control plan with lessons learned from the F–22 program, a plan for full climatic testing 

early in the program to robustly address the effects of severe wet 

weather, temperature extremes, and high humidity, an appropriate 

corrosion risk mitigation follow-on plan (including management of 

the corrosion risk of parts qualified by similarity), expanded involvement of the Naval Air Systems Command corrosion testing capability and Air Force Research Laboratory low-observable testing 

capability, reconsideration of the selection of materials and coating, 

and responsibility for management of the Autonomic Logistics Information System link with the Aircraft Structural Integrity Program. 

Modification of requirements relating to minimum capital investment for certain depots (sec. 325) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 328) that would 

modify the requirements relating to minimum capital investment 

for certain depots. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

321). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would ensure 

that capital investment funds are spent solely to modernize or imVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00635 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
606 

prove the efficiency of depot facilities, equipment, work environment, or processes in direct support of depot operations. 

The conferees note that sustainment operation and maintenance funding does not count towards the 6 percent minimum capital investment requirement, but restoration and modernization operation and maintenance funding does. 

Reports on depot-related activities (sec. 326) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 324) that 

would require a report from the Secretary of Defense on the status 

of the drawdown, retrograde, and reset program for the equipment 

used in support of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The provision would also require a report on the alignment, organizational 

reporting, and performance rating of Air Force system program 

managers, product support managers at Air Logistics Centers or 

Air Logistics Complexes, and a review of the civilian and military 

command structure associated with the Air Force Materiel Command realignment. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Core depot-level maintenance and repair capabilities (sec. 327) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 322) that would 

modify core logistics capabilities requirements (10 U.S.C. 2464) and 

require an annual report. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the study on the future capability of 

the Department of Defense (DOD) maintenance depots directed by 

section 322 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417) found that the existing core determination process should be revised to ensure that it 

is visible and readily understood. Through this conference agreement, the conferees confirm the criticality of a government-controlled source of repair to support warfighter requirements. The 

conferees believe a streamlined core policy that eliminates exclusions and exemptions and instead provides for conditional waivers 

of government performance is in keeping with the section 322 

study’s recommendations. To provide greater transparency of the 

core determination process, the conference agreement includes an 

annual core report that should align capital investment to support 

current and emerging core requirements and better align 

sustainment planning with acquisition and development. 

Subtitle D—Readiness 

Modification of Department of Defense authority to accept voluntary 

contributions of funds (sec. 331) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 331) that would 

make a technical amendment to section 358(g) of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383) to clarify that voluntary contributions received from 

developers to offset the cost of mitigating adverse impacts on miliVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00636 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
607 

tary operations and readiness and may be used for the purpose of 

conducting studies and will remain available until expended. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

344). 

The Senate recedes. 

Review of proposed structures affecting navigable airspace (sec. 332) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 332) that would require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 

develop procedures to allow the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to review and comment on aeronautical studies prior to completion of such studies. 

The Senate amendment no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle E—Reports 

Annual certification and modifications of annual report on 

prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 341) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 341) that would, 

upon the arrival of the President’s budget request for a fiscal year 

under section 1105 of title 31, require the Secretary of Defense to 

certify in writing that the prepositioned stocks of each of the military departments meet all operational plans, in both rate of fill and 

readiness. The provision also would require the Secretary of Defense to report on the inclusion of non-standard items selected for 

inclusion in prepositioned stocks and the long-term sustainment 

plan beyond current operations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Additional matters for inclusion in and modified deadline for the 

annual report on operational energy (sec. 342) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 346) that would increase the reporting requirements for the annual report on operational energy. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 334) 

that would modify the deadline for the annual report on operational energy. 

The Senate recedes. 

Study on Air Force test and training range infrastructure (sec. 343) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 331) that 

would require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study on 

the ability of the major air test and training range infrastructure 

to support the full spectrum of Air Force operations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Study on training range infrastructure for special operations forces 

(sec. 344) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 332) that 

would require the Commander of U.S. Special Operations ComVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00637 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
608 

mand to conduct a study on existing training ranges used by special operations forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Guidance to establish non-tactical wheeled vehicle and equipment 

service life extension programs to achieve costs savings (sec. 

345) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 333) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a survey and determine the advisability for establishing a service life extension 

program for non-tactical wheeled vehicles and base-level commercial equipment in the fleets of the military departments. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Study on United States force posture in the United States Pacific 

Command area of responsibility (sec. 346) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 345) that would require the Secretary of Defense to study training requirements in 

the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1079) that would require an independent assessment of the United 

States force posture in East Asia and the Pacific. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require an 

independent assessment of the United States military force posture 

throughout the Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

The conferees note that over recent years, the United States 

has embarked on a number of initiatives in the Pacific Command 

area of responsibility that are intended to realign our military force 

structure to respond to regional interests and, in this regard, U.S. 

bilateral security arrangements, especially with Japan and the Republic of Korea. Our continued strong alliance and cooperation with 

these two countries maintain a significant part of the foundation 

that supports our force posture and military activities in the region. Accordingly, the conferees direct that the assessment required 

by this provision include a particular focus on the current posture 

and plans for United States force realignments in Korea, Okinawa, 

and Guam. 

The amendment also includes a requirement for an independent study of the overseas basing presence of United States 

forces, as codified in section 347. 

Study on overseas basing presence of United States forces (sec. 347) 

The conferees agreed to a study on overseas basing presence of 

United States Forces. 

Inclusion of assessment of joint military training and force allocations in Quadrennial Defense Review and National Military 

Strategy (sec. 348). 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 344) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment of joint 

military training and the effectiveness of the Joint Staff in carrying 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
609 

out the missions of planning and experimentation formerly accomplished by United States Joint Forces Command. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would include the 

assessment of joint military training and force allocations in the 

Quadrennial Defense Review and National Military Strategy. 

Modification of report on procurement of military working dogs (sec. 

349) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 343) that would 

amend section 358 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417), which is 

codified at section 2302 (note) of title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to provide additional information on 

the use of military working dogs on a contracted basis, the status 

of the Department’s breeding programs, and the future military 

working dog force structure. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would retain the 

data elements currently required in the report and change the reporting interval to biennial vice annual. 

Subtitle F—Limitations and Extension of Authority 

Adoption of military working dog by family of deceased or seriously 

wounded member of the armed forces who was the dog’s handler (sec. 351) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 351) that would 

amend section 2583(c) of title 10, United States Code, to clarify the 

circumstances justifying the adoption of a military working dog 

prior to the end of its useful life and to authorize the adoption of 

a military working dog by certain family members of a deceased or 

seriously wounded member of the armed forces who was the handler of the dog. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Prohibition on expansion of the Air Force food transformation initiative (sec. 352) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 352) that would prohibit the expansion of the Air Force food transformation initiative 

until 270 days after the Secretary of the Air Force reports to the 

congressional defense committees on the implementation and impact of the initiative. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would prohibit 

the expansion of the initiative until the Secretary submits the report, and simplifying the reporting requirement. 

Designation and limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds 

for the migration of Army enterprise email services (sec. 353) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 353) that would limit 

the obligation or expenditure of funds for the migration of Army 

enterprise email services until the Secretary of the Army delivers 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
610 

a report comparing the service provided by the Defense Information 

Systems Agency and the Army Knowledge Online system. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would designate 

the Army enterprise email services program a formal acquisition 

program under the oversight of the Army acquisition executive, and 

change the limitation from 2 percent of the funds to no funds. It 

also adds additional provisions to the report required to lift the 

limitation. 

The conferees note their concern about the execution of the migration of Army enterprise email services, but also recognize that 

currently many Army users have already migrated to the new Defense Information Systems Agency-provided solution. The conferees 

interpret the existing legislative language to be a limitation only on 

funds for the continued migration of users and not for the 

sustainment and maintenance of those users already migrated. 

One-year extension of pilot program for availability of working-capital funds to Army for certain product improvements (sec. 354) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 354) that would extend section 330(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (P.L. 110–181) by 1 year. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Commercial sale of small arms ammunition and small arms ammunition components in excess of military requirements, and 

fired cartridge cases (sec. 361) 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 343) 

that would amend section 346 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) by 

making available for sale any small arms ammunition and small 

ammunition components which are in excess of military requirements. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the intent of section 346 of Public Law 

111–383, as amended, is to clarify that the only fired cartridge 

cases (referred to as expended small arms cartridge cases) subject 

to the provision are intact expended small arms cartridge cases and 

that the provision does not apply outside the continental United 

States or overrides established Department of Defense (DOD) trade 

security controls or explosives safety controls. The conferees note 

that the DOD would be permitted to demilitarize and recycle expended small arms cartridge cases covered by the provision so long 

as there is not a significant decrease in intact expended small arms 

cartridge cases being made available for sale and there is no evidence that commercial demands are not generally being met. The 

conferees note that based on its current force structure and training requirements, the DOD currently makes approximately 6–8 

million pounds of intact (non-demilitarized) expended small arms 

cartridge cases available each year for commercial sales. The conVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00640 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
611 

ferees recognize that the amount made available may change as 

the DOD’s force structure or training requirements change. The 

conferees note that the DOD would be responsible for assessing 

commercial demands for the purpose of implementing this requirement; the conferees understand that the DOD may choose to conduct market surveys or studies to assess commercial demands for 

this purpose. 

Comptroller General review on space-available travel on military 

aircraft (sec. 362) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 346) that 

would add a new section 2641c to title 10, United States Code, that 

would codify the authority of the Secretary of Defense to establish 

a program to provide transportation to active and reserve members, retirees, dependents, and non-remarried widows of service 

members on Department of Defense aircraft on a space available 

basis and in a budget-neutral manner. The provision would also require a Comptroller General study on the Department’s spaceavailable travel program, including a review of the cost and capacity of the system and a discussion of logistical and management 

issues. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would strike the 

provisions concerning codification of the space available program, 

and would require the Comptroller General in his review to assess 

the effect on the cost and capacity of the program if the program 

were extended to un-remarried widows of active and reserve component members, and expanded for gray area retirees to include 

overseas travel. 

Authority to provide information for maritime safety of forces and 

hydrographic support (sec. 363) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 362) that would 

amend part IV of subtitle C of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of the Navy to collect and share certain marine data and hydrographic information. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1023). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Deposit of reimbursed funds under reciprocal fire protection agreements (sec. 364) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 363) that would, as 

requested by the Department of Defense (DOD), amend section 

1856d(b) of title 42, United States Code, to ensure that reimbursements to the DOD under the Reciprocal Fire Protection Agreements (42 U.S.C. chapter 15A) do not expire and that the command 

which provides fire protection services in the event of an emergency is able to merge the reimbursed funds with those in the current appropriation, fund, or account, which is used for DOD fire 

protection services. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1004). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
612 

Clarification of the airlift service definitions relative to the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (sec. 365) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 366) that would refine the definition of Civil Reserve Air Fleet aircraft. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1045). 

The Senate recedes. 

Ratemaking procedures for Civil Reserve Air Fleet contracts (sec. 

366) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 367) that would clarify that contracts establishing rates for services provided by air carriers who are participants in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) 

program are not subject to the Truth in Negotiations Act (section 

2306a of title 10, United States Code) or the Cost Accounting 

Standards (section 1502 of title 41, United States Code). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

883). 

The Senate recedes. 

Policy on active shooter training for certain law enforcement personnel (sec. 367) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 369) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a policy and promulgate 

guidelines to ensure that civilian and military law enforcement personnel charged with security functions on military installations 

shall receive active shooter training as described in finding 4.3 of 

the document entitled, ‘‘Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort 

Hood.’’ 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Procurement of tents or other temporary structures (sec. 368) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 146) that would require the Secretary of Defense to consider the total life cycle costs 

of tents or structures, including the costs associated with any 

equipment or fuel needed to heat or cool such tents or structures, 

when procuring tents or other temporary structures, and award 

contracts that provide best value to the United States. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Consideration of energy security and reliability in development and 

implementation of energy performance goals 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 316) that 

would consider energy security and reliability in the development 

and implementation of energy performance goals. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
613 

Limitation on revising the definition of depot-level maintenance 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 322) that 

would limit the Secretary of Defense on revising the definition, 

guidance, regulations, policy, and revisions of depot-level maintenance until receipt of a report prepared by the Defense Business 

Board. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Redesignation of core competencies as core depot maintenance capabilities for Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 324) that would 

amend section 2474 of title 10, United States Code, by modifying 

core competencies to core logistics capabilities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Modification of report on maintenance and repair of vessels in foreign shipyards 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 342) that would 

modify section 7310(c) of title 10, United States Code, to include reporting on vessels that are operated pursuant to a contract entered 

into by the Military Sealift Command, the Maritime Administration, or the U.S. Transportation Command. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Working-capital fund accounting 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 342) that 

would amend section 2208(k) of title 10, United States Code, to 

align the two separate dollar thresholds for procurement of capital 

assets. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees continue to be concerned with an apparent disconnect in thresholds for capital assets between auditing standards 

and financial management regulations. The conferees note that 

while section 342 of the Senate amendment could resolve internal 

disconnects amongst financial enterprise systems, it would not 

comply with auditing standards. 

Regardless, the conferees strongly urge the Department of Defense to continue to work to resolve this apparent disconnect. 

Modification of report on SEAD/DEAD mission requirements of the 

Air Force 

The House contained a provision (sec. 355) that would amend 

section 334 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). Section 334 required a 

report on the suppression of enemy air defenses/destruction of 

enemy air defenses (SEAD/DEAD) mission requirements for the Air 

Force. Section 355 would have modified the due date for the report, 

and made other technical corrections. 

The Senate contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
614 

The conferees received the SEAD/DEAD report, including a 

classified annex, in August, 2011, as would have been required by 

the modifications in section 355. The report addressed the feasibility and desirability of expanding the role of the Air National 

Guard in conducting the SEAD/DEAD mission and incorporated 

the suggested changes proposed in section 355. 

Limitation on obligation and expenditure of funds for migration of 

management of Air Force Enterprise Logistics Systems Program 

Executive Office pending cost-benefit analysis 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 356) that would limit 

Air Force funds for the migration of the Air Force Enterprise Logistics Systems Program Executive Office subject to a cost-benefit 

analysis. 

The Senate bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Consideration of foreclosure circumstances in adjudication of security clearances 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 361) that would require the Secretary of Defense to give special consideration during 

security clearance adjudications to service members with a foreclosure on the member’s credit report. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that protections are already included in the 

December 29, 2005, Revised Adjudicative Guidelines for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Information. Guideline F 

of the Adjudicative Guidelines specifically addresses procedures for 

financial considerations, to include foreclosures, as part of the security clearance review process. The conferees further note that this 

should help ensure that clearances are reviewed individually and 

personnel security clearances are not denied solely on financial circumstances that are beyond the individual’s control. 

Reduction in amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to 

the Department of Defense for printing and reproduction 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 364) that would decrease the operation and maintenance accounts of the military departments by 10 percent for printing and reproduction. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the operation and maintenance accounts for printing and reproduction for the military departments 

were decreased by 10 percent in the section 4301 budget tables. 

Reduction in amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to 

the Department of Defense for studies, analysis, and evaluations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 365) that would decrease the operation and maintenance accounts of the military departments by 10 percent for studies, analysis, and evaluations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
615 

The conferees note that the operation and maintenance accounts for the military departments were decreased for studies, 

analysis, and evaluations by 10 percent in the section 4301 budget 

tables. 

Sense of Congress on proposed Federal Aviation Administration 

changes to flight crew member duty and rest requirements 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 368) that would express the sense of Congress that, among other things, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in consultation with the Commander of the United States Transportation 

Command (TRANSCOM), should develop guidelines that address 

not only crew fatigue, but also enhance safety while minimizing the 

impact on the mission of TRANSCOM and the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. The 

Senate report (S. Rept. 112–26) accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (S. 1253) would direct 

the Commander of TRANSCOM to provide a report to the appropriate committees of Congress assessing, among other things, the 

potential effects of the proposed rulemaking by the FAA on 

TRANSCOM operations and what steps are available to 

TRANSCOM and other government agencies who rely on Civil Reserve Air Fleet support to mitigate the effects of a potential FAA 

rule making. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees agree that the Department of Defense should 

conduct an assessment as outlined in the Senate report, but that 

the Secretary should decide on how to produce the report, including 

perhaps relying on an independent analysis group to lead that effort. 

Assistance for homeland defense mission training 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 370) that would authorize the Department of Defense to provide funding assistance 

for the operation and maintenance of training facilities capable of 

providing emergency response training. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 401) that would authorize the following end strengths for active-duty personnel of the 

armed forces as of September 30, 2012: Army, 562,000; Navy, 

325,739; Marine Corps, 202,100; and Air Force, 332,800. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 401) 

that would authorize active-duty end strength for the Navy of 

325,700. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
616 

End strength levels for the active forces for fiscal year 2012 are 

set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommenda- tion 

FY 2012 re- quest FY 2011 authorized 

Army ...................................................................... 569,400 562,000 562,000 0 ¥7,400 

Navy ....................................................................... 328,700 325,700 325,700 0 ¥3,000 

Marine Corps ......................................................... 202,100 202,100 202,100 0 0 

Air Force ................................................................ 332,200 332,800 332,800 0 600 

DOD Total ..................................................... 1,432,400 1,422,600 1,422,600 0 ¥9,800 

Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels 

(sec. 402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 402) that would establish the following minimum end strengths for active-duty personnel as of September 30, 2012: Army, 562,000; Navy, 325,739; 

Marine Corps, 202,100; and Air Force 332,800. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would establish 

minimum active-duty end strengths for the Army of 547,400 and 

for the Navy of 325,700. 

Minimum end strength levels for active-duty personnel for fiscal year 2012 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Recommendation FY 2011 

Army ........................................................................................................................ 547,400 547,400 0 

Navy ........................................................................................................................ 324,300 325,700 1,400 

Marine Corps ........................................................................................................... 202,100 202,100 0 

Air Force .................................................................................................................. 332,200 332,800 600 

DOD Total ....................................................................................................... 1,406,000 1,408,000 2,000 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 411) that would authorize the following end strengths for Selected Reserve personnel, 

including the end strengths for reserves on active duty in support 

of the reserves, as of September 30, 2012: the Army National 

Guard of the United States, 358,200; the Army Reserve, 205,000; 

the Navy Reserve, 66,200; the Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600; the 

Air National Guard of the United States, 106,700; the Air Force 

Reserve, 71,400; and the Coast Guard Reserve, 10,000. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

411). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

End strength levels for the Selected Reserve for fiscal year 

2012 are set forth in the following table: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
617 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2012 request FY 2011 authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 358,200 358,200 358,200 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 205,000 205,000 205,000 0 0 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 65,500 66,200 66,200 0 700 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 39,600 39,600 39,600 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 106,700 106,700 106,700 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 71,200 71,400 71,400 0 200 

DOD Total ..................................................... 846,200 847,100 847,100 0 900 

Coast Guard Reserve ............................................ 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 

End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves 

(sec. 412) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 412) that would authorize the following end strengths for reserves on active duty in 

support of the reserve components as of September 30, 2012: the 

Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060; the Army Reserve, 16,261; the Navy Reserve, 10,337; the Marine Corps Reserve, 

2,261; the Air National Guard of the United States, 14,833; and the 

Air Force Reserve, 2,662. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 412) 

that would authorize end strengths for the Navy Reserve of 10,688; 

the Air National Guard of the United States of 14,584; and the Air 

Force Reserve of 2,992. 

The Senate recedes. 

End strength levels for reserves on active duty in support of 

the reserves for fiscal year 2012 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommenda- tion 

FY 2012 re- quest FY 2011 authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 32,060 32,060 32,060 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 16,261 16,261 16,261 0 0 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 10,688 10,337 10,337 0 ¥351 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 2,261 2,261 2,261 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 14,584 14,833 14,833 0 249 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 2,992 2,662 2,662 0 ¥330 

DOD Total ..................................................... 78,846 78,414 78,414 0 ¥432 

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 413) that would authorize the following end strengths for military technicians (dual 

status) as of September 30, 2012: the Army Reserve, 8,395; the 

Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210; the Air Force 

Reserve, 10,777; and the Air National Guard of the United States, 

22,509. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 413) 

that would authorize end strengths for military technicians (dual 

status) for the Air Force Reserve of 10,720 and for the Air National 

Guard of the United States of 22,394. 

The Senate recedes. 

End strength levels for military technicians (dual status) for 

fiscal year 2012 are set forth in the following table: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
618 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2012 request FY 2011 authorized 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 8,395 8,395 8,395 0 0 

Army National Guard ............................................. 27,210 27,210 27,210 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 10,720 10,777 10,777 0 57 

Air National Guard ................................................ 22,394 22,509 22,509 0 115 

DOD Total ..................................................... 68,719 68,891 68,891 0 172 

Fiscal year 2012 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians (sec. 414) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 414) that would establish the following personnel limits for the reserve components of 

the Army and Air Force for non-dual status technicians as of September 30, 2012: the Army National Guard of the United States, 

1,600; the Air National Guard of the United States, 350; the Army 

Reserve, 595; and the Air Force Reserve, 90. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

414). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Personnel limitations for non-dual status technicians for fiscal 

year 2012 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommenda- tion 

FY 2012 re- quest FY 2011 authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 350 350 350 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 595 595 595 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 90 90 90 0 0 

DOD Total ..................................................... 2,635 2,635 2,635 0 0 

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active 

duty for operational support (sec. 415) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 415) that would authorize the maximum number of reserve component personnel who 

may be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2012 

to provide operational support. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

415). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

The maximum number of reserve component personnel who 

may be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2012 

is set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommenda- tion 

FY 2012 re- quest FY 2011 authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 6,200 6,200 6,200 0 0 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
619 

Service FY 2011 authorized 

FY 2012 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2012 request FY 2011 authorized 

Air National Guard ................................................ 16,000 16,000 16,000 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0 

DOD Total ..................................................... 69,200 69,200 69,200 0 0 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Military personnel (sec. 421) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 421) that would authorize appropriations for military personnel. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

421). 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy 

Increase in authorized strengths for Marine Corps officers on active 

duty in grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel (sec. 

501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 501) that would 

amend section 523(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, to increase 

the grade strength limitations for active-duty Marine Corps officers 

in the grade of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel to enable the 

Marine Corps to shape its force to meet current and future manpower requirements. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

501). 

The Senate recedes. 

General officer and flag officer reform (sec. 502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 502) that would 

eliminate 14 authorizations for general and flag officers in joint 

duty assignments, add up to 7 officers serving in intelligence positions to count against the joint duty assignment limit, eliminate 11 

Air Force general officer authorizations, and require that the superintendents of the service academies be counted against their respective service’s general and flag officer limits. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would amend sections 525 and 526 of title 10 to increase the numbers of general 

and flag officers on active duty to include the additional general 

and flag officers that will now be counted against their respective 

service’s general and flag officer limits. 

National Defense University outplacement waiver (sec. 503) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 503) that 

would amend section 663 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Defense, in an individual case, to assign a 

graduate of the National Defense University who is not designated 

as a joint qualified officer to a joint assignment other than a joint 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
620 

duty assignment. The provision would also exclude from the requirement to be assigned to a joint duty assignment after graduation those joint qualified officers and other officers who graduate 

from a school within the National Defense University following 

pursuit of a program on an other-than-in-residence basis. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Voluntary retirement incentive matters (sec. 504) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 502) that 

would amend chapter 36 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize a voluntary retirement incentive payment of up to 12 times an 

officer’s monthly basic pay to certain officers with between 20 and 

29 years of active-duty service. This authority, which was requested by the Department of Defense, would expire not later than 

December 31, 2018, and would be used to reduce end strength in 

a responsible manner during the planned force drawdown. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

voluntary retirement incentive to no more than 675 members 

through the expiration of the authority on December 31, 2018. The 

amendment would also reinstate temporary early retirement authority contained in section 4403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484) for the military services, effective until December 31, 2018. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Leadership of National Guard Bureau (sec. 511) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 511) that would 

amend section 10502 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Secretary of Defense to designate the positions of the Chief of the 

National Guard Bureau and the Vice Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau as positions to be excluded from the limitation on the number of general and flag officers on active duty and from general officer distribution limits under sections 525 and 526 of title 10, 

United States Code; establish an order of succession for a vacancy 

in the office of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau; and redesignate the position of the Director of the Joint Staff of the National 

Guard Bureau as Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1602) that 

would redesignate the position of the Director of the Joint Staff of 

the National Guard Bureau as Vice Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Membership of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau on the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff (sec. 512) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 515) that would 

amend section 10502 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau to serve as an advocate and 

liaison for state National Guards, and would amend section 151 of 

title 10, United States Code, to include the Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
621 

The Senate amendment contained a provision that would 

amend section 151 of title 10, United States Code, to include the 

Chief of the National Guard Bureau as a member of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would amend section 10502 of title 10, United States Code, to provide that, as a 

member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Chief of the National 

Guard Bureau has the specific responsibility of addressing matters 

involving non-Federalized National Guard forces in support of 

homeland defense and civil support missions. 

Modification of time in which preseparation counseling must be provided to reserve component members being demobilized (sec. 

513) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 512) that would 

amend section 1142 of title 10, United States Code, to require that 

individual preseparation counseling be made available to members 

of the reserve component and to authorize commencement of 

preseparation counseling for demobilizing members of a reserve 

component less than 90 days before the projected date of discharge 

or release from active duty when operational requirements make it 

unfeasible to do so at an earlier date. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

513). 

The House recedes. 

The conferees believe the existing authority in 1142(a)(1) of 

title 10, United States Code, includes members of the reserve component who have an anticipated separation date and does not need 

to be further modified. The committee recommends that the Secretary of Defense clarify in policy the availability of preseparation 

counseling to members of the reserve component. 

Clarification of applicability of authority for deferral of mandatory 

separation of military technicians (dual status) until age 60 

(sec. 514) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 513) that would 

amend section 10216(f) of title 10, United States Code, to clarify 

that the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force 

may allow a military technician (dual status) to continue serving 

beyond their mandatory separation date until the technician 

reaches the age of 60 and becomes eligible for an unreduced civilian annuity, if they otherwise continue to meet the requirements 

for dual status. Under current law, the Secretaries are required to 

allow such continued service. The provision would also amend section 10216(f) to clarify that it applies to both officers and enlisted 

technicians. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Authority to order Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve to active duty to provide assistance 

in response to a major disaster or emergency (sec. 515) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 515) that 

would amend chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, to auVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00651 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
622 

thorize the Secretary of Defense, without the consent of the member affected, to order any unit, and any member not assigned to a 

unit organized to serve as a unit, of the Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve to active duty 

for a continuous period of not more than 120 days in response to 

a Governor’s request for Federal assistance in responding to a 

major disaster or emergency. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Authority for order to active duty of units of the Selected Reserve for 

preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands 

(sec. 516) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 511) that 

would amend chapter 1209 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the secretary of a military department to order units, and 

certain members of the Selected Reserve or the Individual Ready 

Reserve, without the consent of the members concerned, to active 

duty for not more than 365 consecutive days for preplanned missions. The service secretaries would be authorized to exercise this 

authority only if the manpower and associated costs of the active 

duty and a description of the mission are included in the budget 

materials covering the fiscal year or years in which the units or 

members are anticipated to be ordered to active duty. No more 

than 60,000 reserve component members may be on active duty 

under this authority at any one time. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the secretary of a military department to order units, and certain 

members of the Selected Reserve or the Individual Ready Reserve, 

without the consent of the members concerned, to active duty for 

not more than 365 consecutive days for preplanned missions in 

support of a combatant command. 

Modification of eligibility for consideration for promotion for reserve 

officers employed as military technicians (dual status) (sec. 517) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 514) that would 

amend section 14301 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that 

reserve officers employed as military technicians (dual status) who 

have been retained beyond their mandatory removal date for years 

of service under either section 10216(f) or 14702(a)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code, are not eligible for consideration for promotion 

by a mandatory promotion board convened under section 14101(a) 

of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

512). 

The Senate recedes. 

Consideration of reserve component officers in appointments to certain command positions (sec. 518) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1608) that 

would require the officer serving in the position of Commander, 

Army North Command shall be an officer in the Army National 

Guard and the officer serving in the position of Commander, Air 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
623 

Force North Command shall be an officer in the Air National 

Guard. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require 

that whenever officers of the Armed Forces are considered for appointment to the position of Commander, Army North Command or 

Commander, Air Force North Command, fully qualified officers of 

the National Guard and the Reserves shall be considered for appointment to such position. 

Report on termination of military technician as a distinct personnel 

management category (sec. 519) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 514) that 

would direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct an independent 

study of the feasibility and advisability of terminating the military 

technician program as a personnel management category and to report to the congressional defense committees on this study, including any recommendations for statutory or administrative change, 

no later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar amendment. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sense of Congress on the unique nature, demands, and hardships 

of military service (sec. 521) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 521) that would 

amend chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, to codify findings 

regarding the unique nature, demands, and hardships of military 

service. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would express 

the sense of Congress regarding the unique nature, demands, and 

hardships of military service. 

Policy addressing dwell time and measurement and data collection 

regarding unit operating tempo and personnel tempo (sec. 522) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 522) that would 

amend section 991 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Secretary of Defense to prescribe a policy addressing dwell time for 

members of the armed forces. The provision would also require the 

Secretary to establish a system for tracking and recording the 

number of days each service member is deployed, prescribe policies 

and procedures for measuring operations tempo and personnel 

tempo, and maintain a central data collection repository to provide 

information for research, analysis, interagency reporting, and evaluation of programs and policies. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Protected communications by members of the armed forces and prohibition of retaliatory personnel actions (sec. 523) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530) that would extend whistleblower protection to certain communications to a memVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00653 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
624 

ber of Congress, an inspector general, a member of a Department 

of Defense audit, inspection, investigation, or law enforcement organization of ideologically based threats or actions. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend this 

protection against retaliatory personnel actions to a member of the 

armed forces who complains of, or discloses information that the 

member reasonably believes constitutes evidence of a threat by a 

member of the armed forces or employee of the Federal Government that indicates a determination or intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury to members of the armed forces or civilians or 

damage to military, federal, or civilian property. 

Notification requirement for determination made in response to review of proposal for award of Medal of Honor not previously 

submitted in timely fashion (sec. 524) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 532) that would 

amend section 1130 of title 10, United States Code, to require that 

the Secretary of Defense submit the rationale regarding a favorable 

recommendation on a request for a review of a proposal for the 

award of the Medal of Honor to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives and to the Member 

of Congress who requested the review. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Expansion of regular enlisted members covered by early discharge 

authority (sec. 525) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 523) that 

would amend section 1171 of title 10, United States Code, to expand from 3 months to 1 year the period prior to the expiration of 

an enlistment term during which a service member may be discharged without loss of benefits. The member would not be entitled 

to pay and allowances for the period not served. This authority, 

which was requested by the Department of Defense, would be used 

to reduce end strength in a responsible manner during the planned 

force drawdown. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Extension of voluntary separation pay and benefits authority (sec. 

526) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 524) that 

would amend section 1175a of title 10, United States Code, to extend until December 31, 2018, the authority to provide voluntary 

separation pay and benefits to eligible members of the armed forces 

who are voluntarily separated from active duty. This authority, 

which was requested by the Department of Defense, would be used 

to reduce end strength in a responsible manner during the planned 

force drawdown. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
625 

Prohibition on denial of reenlistment of members for unsuitability 

based on the same medical condition for which they were determined to be fit for duty (sec. 527) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 522) that 

would amend section 1214a of title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the denial of reenlistment of a service member who has been 

determined by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) to be fit for duty 

based on a subsequent administrative determination that the member is unsuitable for deployment or worldwide assignment based on 

the same medical condition that was considered by the PEB. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Designation of persons authorized to direct disposition of remains of 

members of the armed forces (sec. 528) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 529) that would include among the individuals authorized to direct the disposition of 

remains of a deceased service member the individual identified by 

the decedent on the record of emergency data maintained by the 

service secretary, regardless of the relationship of the designee to 

the decedent. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Matters covered by preseparation counseling for members of the 

Armed Forces and their spouses (sec. 529) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 578) that would 

amend section 1142(b) of title 10, United States Code, to authorize 

inclusion of a service member’s spouse during certain segments of 

preseparation counseling and require that additional topics be included in preseparation counseling. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Conversion of high-deployment allowance from mandatory to authorized (sec. 530) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 521) that 

would repeal the authority and requirement to pay the high-deployment allowance under section 436 of title 37, United States Code. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would retain the 

statutory authority regarding the high-deployment allowance, but 

would make it permissive rather than mandatory. 

Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to 

enhance retention of members of the armed forces (sec. 531) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 524) that would extend for 3 years the authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of service members under section 533 of 

the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
626 

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools (sec. 532) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 525) that would require service secretaries to treat graduates who receive diplomas 

from secondary schools that are legally operating or who otherwise 

complete a program of secondary education in compliance with the 

laws of the State in which the graduates reside in the same manner as graduates of secondary schools as defined by section 

9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

(20 U.S.C. 7801(38)) for purposes of recruitment and enlistment in 

the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

526). 

The House recedes. 

Department of Defense Suicide Prevention Program (sec. 533) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 528) that would require the Secretary of Defense to take appropriate actions to enhance the suicide prevention program of the Department of Defense through the provision of suicide prevention information and 

resources to members of the armed forces from their initial enlistment or appointment through their final retirement or separation 

and develop suicide prevention information in cooperation with 

public and private entities. The provision also prescribed elements 

of suicide prevention training during recruit basic training for each 

military service. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would delete 

basic recruit training elements and amend section 1142 of title 10, 

United States Code, to include in preseparation counseling the 

availability to the member and dependents of suicide prevention resources following separation from the armed forces. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice and Legal Matters 

Reform of offenses relating to rape, sexual assault, and other sexual 

misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 

541) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 551) that 

would amend section 920 of title 10, United States Code (Article 

120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), to separate 

Article 120, UCMJ, into three separate articles applying to the offenses of rape and sexual assault, sexual offenses against children; 

and other non-consensual sexual misconduct offenses. The provision would also repeal section 125 of title 10, United States Code 

(Article 125 of the UCMJ), the offense of sodomy. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would delete the 

repeal of section 125 of title 10, United States Code (Article 125 of 

the UCMJ). 

Authority to compel production of documentary evidence (sec. 542) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 552) that 

would amend section 847 of title 10, United States Code, to authorVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00656 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
627 

ize subpoenas duces tecum to compel production of documents and 

other tangible evidence for an investigation, including an investigation pursuant to article 32(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 832(b)), consistent with other federal criminal court 

practice. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

subpoenas duces tecum to compel production of documents and 

other tangible evidence for an investigation pursuant to article 

32(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 832(b)), require that individuals who receive a subpoena must be provided a 

means for reimbursement for fees and mileage, and authorize military convening authorities to certify facts to United States attorneys under the provision. 

Clarification of application and extent of direct acceptance of gifts 

authority (sec. 543) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 532) that would expand eligibility to accept gifts to members of the armed forces who 

incur an injury or illness on or after September 11, 2001, in an operation or area designated as a combat operation or a combat zone. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

authorize the acceptance of gifts received after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 for injuries or illnesses incurred on or after September 11, 

2001. 

Freedom of conscience of military chaplains with respect to the performance of marriages (sec. 544) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 527) that 

would provide that a military chaplain who, as a matter of conscience or moral principle, does not wish to perform a marriage 

may not be required to do so. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training Opportunities and 

Administration 

Employment skills training for members of the armed forces on active duty who are transitioning to civilian life (sec. 551) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 541) that would 

amend section 1143 of title 10, United States Code, to allow the 

secretary concerned to permit a member of the armed forces to participate in an apprenticeship program that provides employment 

skills training and assists them in transitioning into new careers 

in civilian life. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

525). 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
628 

Enhancement of authorities on joint professional military education 

(sec. 552) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 541) that 

would amend sections 2151 and 2154 of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize graduates of the National Defense Intelligence 

College to receive credit for completion of joint professional military 

education Phase I. The provision would also eliminate the requirement that the curriculum for Phase II instruction at the Joint 

Forces Staff College be taught only in residence. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program to assess the 

feasibility and advisability of offering a program of instruction for 

Phase II joint professional military education on an other than inresidence basis. 

Temporary authority to wave maximum age limitation on admission to the military service academies (sec. 553) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 545) that would authorize the secretary of a military department to waive the maximum age limitation for admission to a military service academy 

from age 23 to age 26 for an otherwise qualified enlisted service 

member who was prevented from being admitted before reaching 

the maximum age as a result of service in a theater of operation 

for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or Operation New Dawn; and for candidates with an exceptional record 

that sets them apart from other candidates. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 546) 

that applied only to enlisted service members who otherwise meet 

the eligibility requirements for admission to an academy, and who 

were prevented from being admitted before reaching the maximum 

age as a result of service on active duty in a theater of operations 

for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or Operation New Dawn. 

The House recedes. 

Enhancement of administration of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology (sec. 554) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 543) that would 

amend chapter 901 of title 10, United States Code, by adding a 

new section establishing a position of Commandant of the United 

States Air Force Institute of Technology who is either an activeduty officer of the Air Force in a grade not below the grade of colonel or a civilian who was retired from the Air Force in the grade 

not below the grade of brigadier general. This section would also 

establish a position of Provost and Academic Dean at the United 

States Air Force Institute of Technology. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 904) 

that would require that the Commandant either be an active-duty 

Air Force officer not below the grade of colonel, a member of the 

Senior Executive Service, or a civilian individual, including an Air 

Force officer who retired in a grade not below brigadier general, selected by the Secretary of the Air Force. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
629 

Enrollment of certain seriously wounded, ill, or injured former or 

retired enlisted members of the armed forces in associate degree 

programs of the Community College of the Air Force in order 

to complete degree program (sec. 555) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 544) that 

would amend section 9315 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to allow continued participation in associate degree programs of the Community College of the 

Air Force (CCAF) by former or retired enlisted service members 

who had commenced but not completed a program of higher education at the CCAF at the time of their separation from active 

duty, and who have been categorized as seriously wounded, ill, or 

injured, by their service secretary. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Reserve component mental health stipend (sec. 556) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542) that would 

amend section 16201 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize 

the secretaries of the military departments to pay a stipend to 

qualified individuals who agree to be appointed as an officer in a 

reserve component, and who are pursuing or will pursue a course 

of study leading to a degree in clinical psychology or social work 

in exchange for a service commitment of 1 year for every 6 months 

or portion thereof of stipend received. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

543). 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require recipients of the stipend under this authority to agree to serve in the 

Selected Reserve. 

Fiscal year 2012 administration and report on the Troops-to-Teachers Program (sec. 557) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 548) that would 

transfer the responsibility and authority for operation and administration of the Troops-to-Teachers Program from the Secretary of 

Education to the Secretary of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1048) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to administer and fund 

the Troops-to-Teachers Program during fiscal year 2012 and require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Education to 

report to Congress no later than April 1, 2012, on the funding of 

the program; the number of past participants who have fulfilled, 

and who have not fulfilled, their service obligation under the program; the impact of state and local budget shortfalls on employing 

program participants; the program’s effectiveness as a transition 

assistance program; its success in placing teachers in qualified 

schools and rationale for expanding the program to additional 

school districts, and an assessment of the advisability of the administration of the program by the Department of Education in consultation with the Department of Defense. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
630 

Pilot program on receipt of civilian credentialing for skills required 

for military occupational specialties (sec. 558) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 547) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program 

to assess the feasibility and advisability of permitting enlisted 

members of the armed forces to obtain civilian credentialing or licensing for skills required for military occupational specialties or 

qualification for duty specialty codes. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary to complete the pilot program not later than 5 years after 

the date of the commencement of the pilot program. 

The conferees encourage the Secretary to include an assessment of the feasibility of obtaining a commercial driver’s license as 

an element of the pilot program. 

Report on certain education assistance programs (sec. 559) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 547) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on methods to increase the efficiency of the tuition assistance 

program under section 2007 of title 10, United States Code, including a description of the effect of the program on recruiting and retention; an analysis of other programs that provide similar benefits, particularly the programs under chapters 30 and 33 of title 38, 

United States Code; and a description of the impact of modifying 

the tuition assistance program to require service members to pay 

a portion of their educational costs. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would expand the 

report to include the program of education assistance for spouses 

of service members under section 1784a of title 10, United States 

Code. The amendment would also require a description of the costs 

of these programs, including certain information from institutions 

receiving funds under these programs in fiscal years 2009, 2010, 

and 2011. Finally, the amendment would require the report to include an assessment of the feasibility and desirability of requiring 

institutions of higher learning to make available to the Department 

of Defense and prospective beneficiaries certain information concerning their programs as a requirement to participation in the Department’s education assistance programs. 

Subtitle F—Armed Forces Retirement Home 

Control and administration by Secretary of Defense (sec. 561) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 561) that would establish that the administration of the Armed Forces Retirement 

Home, to include the provision of health care and medical care for 

the residents, is a responsibility of the Secretary of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
631 

Senior Medical Advisor oversight of health care provided to residents of Armed Forces Retirement Home (sec. 562) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 562) that would clarify the oversight responsibilities and reporting requirements of the 

Senior Medical Advisor with regard to the health care provided to 

the residents of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1424). 

The Senate recedes. 

Establishment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Advisory Council 

and Resident Advisory Committees (sec. 563) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 563) that would establish one Armed Forces Retirement Home Advisory Council, replacing the local boards established for each of the two facilities of 

the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1425). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Administrators, ombudsmen, and staff of facilities (sec. 564) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 564) that would establish the positions of administrators and ombudsmen in each facility of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1426). 

The Senate recedes. 

Revision of fee requirements (sec. 565) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 565) that would repeal the obsolete transitional fee requirements for the Armed 

Forces Retirement Home and establish permanent fee requirements. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Chief Operating Officer with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, to prescribe monthly fees. 

Revision of inspection requirements (sec. 566) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 566) that would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to conduct a comprehensive inspection of each facility of the Armed 

Forces Retirement Home not less often than every 3 years. This 

section also would require that the Inspector General report to 

Congress and the Secretary of Defense include a plan by the Chief 

Operating Officer to address recommendations contained in the report. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1427). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
632 

Repeal of obsolete transitional provisions and technical conforming, 

and clerical amendments (sec. 567) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 567) that would 

make technical corrections and repeal obsolete transitional provisions in the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (title XV 

of Public Law 101–510). 

The Senate amendment contained similar provisions (sec. 1428 

and 1429). 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family 

Readiness Matters 

Impact aid for children with disabilities (sec. 571) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 572) that would authorize $5.0 million in Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for impact aid payments for children with disabilities 

under section 8003(d) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

Act of 1965 (20 USC 7703(d)), using the formula set forth in section 

363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398), for continuation of the Department of Defense’s assistance to local educational agencies that 

benefit dependents with severe disabilities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that 

benefit dependents of member of the armed forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 572) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 572) that would authorize $30.0 million for continuation of the Department of Defense 

(DOD) assistance program to local educational agencies that are 

impacted by the enrollment of dependent children of military members and DOD civilian employees. The provision would also authorize $10.0 million for assistance to local educational agencies with 

significant changes in enrollment of school-aged dependents of military members and civilian employees due to base closures, force 

structure changes, or force relocations. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 571) that would authorize $25.0 million for the assistance program to local 

educational agencies impacted by the enrollment of dependent children of military members and civilian employees. 

The Senate recedes. 

Three-year extension and enhancement of authorities on transition 

of military dependent students among local educational agencies (sec. 573) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 573) that 

would amend paragraph (2)(B) of section 574(d) of the John Warner 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public 

Law 109–364) to modify the authority for the Secretary of Defense 

to provide grant assistance to local educational agencies to ease the 

transition of military dependent students from Department of Defense schools to other schools and among schools of local eduVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00662 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
633 

cational agencies. The provision would also extend this authority 

until September 30, 2016. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Revision to membership of Department of Defense Military Family 

Readiness Council (sec. 574) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 571) that would 

amend section 1781a of title 10, United States Code, to revise the 

membership of the Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council to include family members, including parents, of 

members of the military services and members of the reserve component. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

576). 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees are disappointed that as of December 9, 2011, 

the Department of Defense Military Family Readiness Council has 

not met in nearly a year. Congress required establishment of the 

council in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008 (Public Law 110–181) for the purpose of assessing the effectiveness of military family programs and making recommendations 

to the Secretary on family policies and programs of the Department. The conferees expect the council to meet not less often than 

twice each year, as required by law, and that not more than one 

of these meetings will be in the National Capitol Region. 

Reemployment rights following certain National Guard duty (sec. 

575) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1093) that 

would provide rights under the Uniformed Services Employment 

and Reemployment Rights Act (Public Law 103–353) to National 

Guard service under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, 

when such service was authorized by the President or Secretary of 

Defense for the purpose of responding to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by federal funds. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

Expansion of Operation Hero Miles (sec. 576) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1049) that 

would amend section 2613 of title 10, United States Code, to include points or awards for free or reduced accommodations at hotels or other commercial facilities as a benefit in the Operation 

Hero Miles program. 

The House bill contained no similar amendment. 

The House recedes. 

Report on Department of Defense autism pilot and demonstration 

projects (sec. 577) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 576) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of RepresentaVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00663 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
634 

tives on any pilot projects that the Department of Defense is conducting on autism services. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment to include in the report all other efforts being conducted by the Department of Defense 

on autism services in the required report. 

Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of 

Defense military spouse employment programs (sec. 578) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 577) that 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to 

carry out a review of all current Department of Defense military 

spouse employment programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment to include in the review the total funding available for each military spouse employment program, the amount obligated for each program, and the 

number of military spouses who have obtained employment following participation in a Department of Defense spouse employment program. 

Subtitle H—Improved Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in 

the Armed Forces 

Access of sexual assault victims to legal assistance and services of 

sexual assault response coordinators and sexual assault victim 

advocates (sec. 581) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 583) that would 

amend chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, to entitle members of the armed forces and dependents of members of the armed 

forces who are victims of a sexual assault to legal assistance, assistance provided by a qualified Sexual Assault Response Coordinator and assistance provided by a qualified Sexual Assault Victim 

Advocate. The provision would also authorize members of the 

armed forces who are victims of a sexual assault to confidentially 

disclose the details of the assault to military legal assistance counsel, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim 

Advocates, personnel staffing the Department of Defense Safe 

Helpline, healthcare personnel, and chaplains. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

563). 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

service secretaries to prescribe regulations not later than 180 days 

after date of enactment of this Act on the provision of legal assistance to military personnel and dependents of military personnel 

who are victims of sexual assault and would provide that restricted 

reports of sexual assaults may be reported to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, and 

healthcare personnel specifically identified in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
635 

Consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit 

transfer based on humanitarian conditions for victim of sexual 

assault or related offense (sec. 582) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 586) that would require the secretary concerned to expedite the consideration and approval of an application for a permanent change of station or unit 

transfer submitted by a member of the Armed Forces who is a victim of sexual assault. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

565). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require 

service secretaries to issue regulations that provide that an application by a victim of sexual assault for a permanent change of station or unit transfer must be approved or disapproved by the member’s commanding officer within 72 hours, and if the application is 

disapproved, the member must be given the opportunity to request 

review by the first general or flag officer in the chain of command, 

and that decision must be made within 72 hours. 

Director of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (sec. 583) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 581) that would require that the Director of the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office be a general or flag officer or an employee of the Department of Defense in a comparable senior executive service position. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

561). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Sexual assault response coordinators and sexual assault victim advocates (sec. 584) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 582) that would require a full time Sexual Assault Response Coordinator and a full 

time Sexual Assault Victim Advocate be assigned to each brigade 

or equivalent unit level of the armed forces and would require the 

Secretary of Defense to establish a training and certification program for Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault 

Victim Advocates. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

562). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and 

response program (sec. 585) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 587) that would require the Secretary of each military department to provide sexual 

assault training and education for members of the armed forces at 

each level of professional military education and for civilian employees of the military department. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
636 

Department of Defense policy and procedures on retention and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the armed forces (sec. 586) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 585) that would 

amend chapter 50 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Department of Defense to maintain records relating to sexual assault involving members of the armed forces or their dependents 

for not less than 100 years, provide the victim permanent access 

to the records maintained by the Department, and require that the 

victim be provided a copy of the court-martial proceedings in certain circumstances. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 566) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to develop a comprehensive policy for 

the Department of Defense on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving service 

members. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

comprehensive policy be developed not later than October 1, 2012; 

that Defense Forms 2910 and 2911 be included in the records that 

must be retained; require that documentary evidence be retained 

for not less than the length of time investigative records are retained; and require that victims of sexual assault be provided with 

a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings of a court-martial 

if the victim testified during the proceedings. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Department of Defense authority to carry out personnel recovery reintegration and post-isolation support activities (sec. 588) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1043) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out reintegration 

and post-isolation support activities for certain persons returned to 

the control of United States authorities following detention in isolation or captivity by a hostile enemy while participating in or associated with a United States-sponsored military activity or mission. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Military adaptive sports program (sec. 589) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 593) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to establish a military adaptive 

sports program to provide adaptive sports programs to eligible 

wounded and injured members of the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and avoid duplicating programs conducted by the Secretary 

and United States Paralympics, Inc., under section 521A of title 38, 

United States Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
637 

Enhancement and improvement of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration 

Program (sec. 590) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 582) that 

would enhance the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program to improve processes for determining best practices for information dispersal and outreach services, as well as improve collaboration with 

state programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Army National Military Cemeteries (sec. 591) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 551) that would establish the general authority of the Secretary of the Army to develop, operate, manage, administer, oversee, and fund the Army 

National Military Cemeteries. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees have not required that future superintendents of 

Army National Cemeteries be military veterans but believe that 

prior honorable military service is an important factor to be considered in their selection. An individual with military service who possesses the qualifications mandated by section 4725(a) would possess experience that the conferees view as invaluable. The conferees also acknowledge that the Army National Cemeteries Advisory Commission recently was established, fulfilling the requirement set forth in section 4723 of title 10, United States Code, as 

added by this provision, and that the Commission has conducted its 

first meeting. 

Inspection of military cemeteries under jurisdiction of the military 

departments (sec. 592) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 552) that would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to inspect the cemeteries at the Armed Forces Retirement Home, the 

United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the United States Air Force Academy, and, based on the 

findings of those inspections, make recommendations for the regulation, management, oversight, and operation of the military cemeteries. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

require the Inspector General of each military department to conduct an inspection of each military cemetery under the jurisdiction 

of that military department. 

Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross for Captain Frederick L. Spaulding for acts of valor during the Vietnam War (sec. 593) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 587) that 

would authorize the award of the Distinguished Service Cross to 

Captain Frederick L. Spaulding for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
638 

Authorization and request for award of Medal of Honor to Emil 

Kapaun for acts of valor during the Korean War (sec. 594) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599D) that would 

authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to Emil Kapaun for acts 

of valor during the Korean War. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

586). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to Jewish American 

World War I veterans (sec. 595) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599B) that would require the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy to 

review the service records of each Jewish American World War I 

veteran who was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the 

Navy Cross, or other military decoration during World War I, or 

whose name is submitted by the Jewish War Veterans of the 

United States of America, to determine whether that veteran 

should be posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy to review the 

service records of any Jewish American World War I veteran 

awarded the Distinguished Service Cross or the Navy Cross for 

heroism during World War I and whose name and supporting material for upgrade of the award to the Medal of Honor are submitted to the service secretary before the end of the 1 year period 

beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Report on process for expedited determination of disability of members of the armed forces with certain disabling conditions (sec. 

596) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 583) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress not later than September 1, 2012, on the feasibility and advisability of a process to expedite the determination of disability for 

service members with certain disabling diseases or conditions, including an evaluation of programs for expedited determinations of 

disability used by other departments and agencies of the Federal 

Government. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

Comptroller General study of military necessity of Selective Service 

System and alternatives (sec. 597) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 595) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States to assess the 

criticality of the Selective Service System to the Department of Defense in meeting future manpower needs of the armed forces that 

are in excess of the ability of an all-volunteer force to provide and 

to determine the fiscal and national security impacts of disestablishing the Selective Service System. In addition, the provision 

would require the study to assess alternatives to disestablishing 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
639 

the Selective Service System, as well as alternatives to registration 

for Selective Service. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Evaluation of issues affecting the disposition of remains of American sailors killed in the explosion of the Ketch U.S.S. Intrepid 

in Tripoli Harbor on September 4, 1804 (sec. 598) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099C) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to exhume the remains of any deceased service member buried in certain mass burial sites in Tripoli, Libya; transfer the remains to a forensics laboratory for identification; transfer identified remains for burial in a veterans cemetery; and transfer unidentified remains to Arlington National Cemetery for burial in the Tomb of the Unknowns. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Navy to determine within 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act the feasibility 

of recovering the remains of American sailors killed in Tripoli Harbor on September 4, 1804, the ability to make identifications of remains within a 2 year period, and the diplomatic and inter-governmental issues that would have to be addressed in order to exhume 

and repatriate the remains. The provision would require the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State to subsequently provide 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 

Representatives with their recommendation regarding the identification, exhumation, and relocation of the remains and their reasons supporting that recommendation. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Modification of definition of ‘‘joint duty assignment’’ to include all 

instructor assignments for joint training and education 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 504) that 

would amend section 668(b)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code, 

to change the definition of joint duty assignment to include instructor positions that provide significant experience in joint matters. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Authorized leave available for members of the armed forces upon 

birth or adoption of a child 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 523) that would increase the number of days of non-chargeable leave from 21 to 42 

that a service member would be granted following the adoption of 

a child, if the service member will be the primary caretaker of the 

child. The provision would also require that in the case of an adoption by a dual military couple that the service member who will not 

be the primary caretaker be granted 10 days of non-chargeable 

leave following the adoption. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
640 

Navy recruiting and advertising 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 526) that would increase funding for the Navy Sea Cadet program by $983,000. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar amendment. 

The House recedes. 

Limitation on simultaneous deployment to combat zones of dualmilitary couples who have minor dependents 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 527) that would require service secretaries to approve requests for deferment from deployment of service members with minor dependents who have a 

service member spouse who is deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay is authorized. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 531) that would 

amend chapter 79 of, title 10, United States Code, to establish 

guidelines for judicial review of decisions by the boards for correction of military records operated by the secretaries of the military 

departments. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

553). 

The House and the Senate recede. This provision is not included in the conference agreement. 

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 531) that would authorize the retroactive award of the Army Combat Action Badge to 

eligible persons for participation in combat during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Additional condition on repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533) that would 

amend the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 (Public Law 

111–321) to require the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of 

Naval Operations, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the 

Chief of Staff of the Air Force to submit to the congressional defense committees their written certification that repeal of the Don’t 

Ask, Don’t Tell law specified in section 654 of title 10, United 

States Code, will not degrade the readiness, effectiveness, cohesion, 

and morale of combat arms units and personnel of their respective 

armed force that are engaged in combat, deployed to a combat theater, or preparing for deployment to a combat theater. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
641 

Military regulations regarding marriage 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 534) that would reaffirm the policy of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, codified 

at section 7 of title 1, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Use of military installations as site for marriage ceremonies and 

participation of chaplains and other military and civilian personnel in their official capacity 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 535) that would 

place certain limitations on the use of military installations for 

marriage ceremonies and the participation of chaplains in such 

ceremonies. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Grade of commissioned officers in uniformed medical accession programs 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 542) that 

would amend sections 2114(b) and 2121(c) of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize medical students attending the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and students participating 

in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial 

Assistance Programs, while on active duty, to serve in pay grade 

O–1, or in pay grade O–2 if they meet specified promotion criteria 

prescribed by the service secretary. The provision would also 

amend section 2004a of title 10, United States Code, to provide 

that an officer detailed as a student at a medical school would 

serve on active duty in the same grade with the same entitlement 

to pay as specified in section 2114(b) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees recognize the value of the Health Professions 

Scholarship Program (HPSP), authorized in subchapter 1 of chapter 105 of title 10, United States Code, which helps the military departments recruit and retain needed health care professionals in 

peacetime and in war. Since 2001, many wounded and ill service 

members returning from combat in Iraq and Afghanistan have required treatment from highly trained physical and occupational 

therapists in their long and difficult road to recovery. Also, because 

of the physical demands of war, physical therapists may be required to deploy in support of military forces. The conferees have 

learned that gaps appear to exist within several military components for qualified physical therapists and occupational therapists 

to fill available military authorizations for these specialties. 

The conferees strongly urge the Department of Defense to use 

all available educational assistance tools, including HPSP, to alleviate any potential shortages in health care personnel, to include an 

assessment of current or projected shortfalls in qualified physical 

and occupational therapy personnel within the military departments and at major military medical treatment facilities specialVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00671 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
642 

izing in the rehabilitation of wounded, ill, and injured members of 

the armed forces. 

Appointments to military service academies from nominations made 

by the governor of Puerto Rico 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 544) that would 

amend sections 4342, 6954 and 9342 of title 10, United States 

Code, to increase the number of nominations to each of the military 

service academies by the Governor of Puerto Rico from 1 to 3. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Consolidation of military department authority to issue arms, tentage, and equipment to educational institutions not maintaining 

units of Junior ROTC 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 545) that 

would amend chapter 152 of title 10, United States Code, to consolidate in one section of law the existing authority contained in 

three separate sections of law for military departments to issue 

arms, tentage, and equipment to educational institutions not maintaining units of the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Education and employment advocacy program for wounded members of the armed forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 546) that would require the Secretary of Defense to obligate an additional $15.0 million for the purpose of an Education and Employment Advocacy 

pilot program to engage wounded members of the armed forces 

early in their recovery. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Diversity recruitment efforts for the military service academies 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549) that would add 

$1.4 million each to Operations and Maintenance for the Army, 

Navy, and Air Force for officer acquisition to expand diversity recruitment efforts for the United States Military Academy, the 

United States Naval Academy, and the United States Air Force 

Academy. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Department of Defense support for programs on pro bono legal representation for members of the armed forces 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 554) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide support to one 

or more public or private programs designed to facilitate representation for service members by pro bono attorneys. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
643 

Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the armed forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 573) that would 

amend title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 

App. 521 et seq.) to prohibit State court judges from considering 

the absence of a service member parent by reason of a deployment, 

or the possibility of deployment, in determining the best interest of 

a child in child custody litigation. The provision would require 

State court judges under certain circumstances to reinstate custody 

orders in favor of service members upon their return from deployments during which a temporary order directing a change of custody was issued. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Center for Military Family and Community Outreach 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 574) that would re- quire the Secretary of the Army to obligate an additional $1.0 million to establish a Center for Military Family and Community Outreach in cooperation with an historically black university to train 

social work students, social work faculty members, and social workers to understand military life and enhance their competencies in 

providing services to military families. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Mental health support for military personnel and families 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 575) that would re- quire the Secretary of the Navy to obligate an additional $3.0 million for a collaborative program that responds to escalating suicide 

rates and combat stress related arrests of military personnel and 

to train active-duty military personnel to recognize combat stress 

disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction, risk-taking behaviors 

and family violence. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding financial counseling for military families 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 577) that would express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 

work with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to ensure coordination with the Office of Servicemember Affairs to provide financial counseling for members of the armed forces and their families. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Cold War Service Medal 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 581) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to authorize the issuance 

of a Cold War Service Medal by the service secretaries. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
644 

Privilege in cases arising under Uniform Code of Military Justice 

against disclosure of communications between sexual assault 

victims and sexual assault response coordinators, victim advocates, and certain other persons 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 584) that would add 

a new Article 140a to the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishing a privilege against disclosure of communications between a 

person who is a victim of a sexual assault and a Sexual Assault 

Response Coordinator (SARC), a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, 

and personnel staffing the Department of Defense (DOD) Safe 

Helpline or successor operation. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 564) that 

would require the President to establish in the Manual for CourtsMartial (MCM) an evidentiary privilege against disclosure of communications to similar effect. 

The House and the Senate recede. Neither provision is included in the conference report. 

The conferees note that the DOD has indicated that a new Executive Order that would amend the MCM by adding a proposed 

new Military Rule of Evidence 514 Victim Advocate Privilege has 

completed all review within the Office of Management and Budget 

and is now with the President for review and approval. Additionally, DOD has amended its controlling regulations to ensure that 

the privilege against disclosure applies to communications with a 

SARC whenever their duties and responsibilities involve victim advocate functions. Once this change to the MCM is signed and implemented, the conferees believe that it accomplishes the objective 

of ensuring privileged communications for sexual assault victims. 

Report on the achievement of diversity goals for the leadership of the 

armed forces 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 584) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the 

achievement of diversity goals for the leadership of the armed 

forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Specification of period in which application for voter registration or 

absentee ballot from an overseas voter is valid 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 585) that 

would amend section 104 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens 

Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff–3) to clarify that the prohibition on refusal by States to accept or process valid applications 

for voter registration and absentee ballots on the grounds of early 

submission applies to overseas voters in the same manner that it 

applies to uniformed service voters. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Authority to provide support and services for certain organizations 

and activities outside Department of Defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 591) that would 

amend section 2012 of title 10, United States Code, to limit to 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
645 

$20.0 million the amount that may be obligated during fiscal year 

2012 or any fiscal year thereafter to provide support and services 

to non-Department of Defense organizations and activities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Display of State, District of Columbia, and territorial flags by 

Armed Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 592) that would 

amend section 2249b of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Secretary of Defense to ensure that whenever the official flags of 

all 50 states are displayed by the armed forces, the flags of the District of Columbia and the territories of the United States shall also 

be displayed. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Wounded warrior careers program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 594) that would re- quire the Secretary of Defense to obligate $1.0 million to carry out 

a career-development program with the Education and Employment Initiative for severely wounded warriors of the armed forces 

and their spouses. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees are aware of the Department’s effort to address 

the high unemployment rate for wounded warriors who have since 

left active duty. The Education and Employment Initiative was established by the Department to leverage the best practices from existing employment and training initiatives in the federal and private sector. The conferees look forward to learning of the results 

of the pilot and any recommendations, including any additional legislative authorities necessary to continue or expand their program. 

Sense of Congress regarding playing of bugle call commonly known 

as ‘‘Taps’’ at military funerals, memorial services, and wreath 

laying ceremonies 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 596) that would express the sense of Congress that the bugle call known as ‘‘Taps’’ 

should be sounded by a live solo bugler or trumpeter at a military 

funeral, memorial service or wreath laying ceremony. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding support for Yellow Ribbon Day 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 597) that would express Congress’ support for Yellow Ribbon Day. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Postal benefits program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 598) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the United 

States Postal Service, to establish a program providing postal beneVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00675 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
646 

fits to service members deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, or who are 

hospitalized for injuries sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on the unauthorized use of names and images of members of the armed forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599A) that would 

amend chapter 49 of title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the 

use of names or images of members of the armed forces and certain 

former members of the armed forces in connection with any merchandise, retail product, impersonation, solicitation, or commercial 

activity in a manner reasonably calculated to connect the individual with their service in the armed forces without the permission of the member or former member. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Limitation on military musical units 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599C) that would 

prohibit the obligation or expenditure of more than $200.0 million 

on military musical units. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Short title 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1601) that 

would cite Title XVI as the ‘‘National Guard Empowerment and 

State-National Defense Integration Act of 2011.’’ 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Resumption of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of 

basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 

601) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 602) that would reauthorize for a period of 1 year previously expired authority to pay 

additional basic allowance for housing in areas impacted by a 

major disaster or at installations experiencing a sudden increase in 

personnel. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

611(g)). 

The Senate recedes. 

Lodging accommodations for members assigned to duty in connection with commissioning or fitting out of a ship (sec. 602) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 603) that would 

amend section 7572 of title 10, United States Code, to expand the 

authority of the Secretary of the Navy to provide lodging accommodations to enlisted service members deprived of quarters aboard 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
647 

ships when the ships are under construction or repair. The provision would also provide the Secretary special authority to compensate service members for their lodging expenses when they are 

deprived of quarters aboard ships that are under construction at 

the shipyards at Pascagoula, Mississippi, and Bath, Maine. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

reserve forces (sec. 611) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 611) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus, the Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus, 

special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority 

units, the Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without 

prior service, the Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment 

bonus for persons with prior service, the Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service, and income replacement for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

611(a)). 

The Senate recedes. 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

health care professionals (sec. 612) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 612) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the nurse officer candidate accession bonus, education loan repayment for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve, accession and retention 

bonuses for psychologists, the accession bonus for registered 

nurses, incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists, special pay for 

Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime 

specialties, the accession bonus for dental officers, the accession 

bonus for pharmacy officers, the accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties, and the accession bonus 

for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

The Senate amendment contained similar provisions (sec. 

611(b) and (c)). 

The Senate recedes. 

One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear 

officers (sec. 613) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 613) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the special pay for nuclearqualified officers extending period of active service, the nuclear career accession bonus, and the nuclear career annual incentive 

bonus. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

611(d)). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
648 

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated 

special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities (sec. 614) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 614) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the general bonus authority 

for enlisted members, the general bonus authority for officers, special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers, special 

aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers, special 

bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions, hazardous duty pay, assignment or special duty pay, skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus, and retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority 

units. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

611(e)). 

The Senate recedes. 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 

37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 615) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the aviation officer retention 

bonus, assignment incentive pay, the reenlistment bonus for active 

members, the enlistment bonus, the accession bonus for new officers in critical skills, the incentive bonus for conversion to military 

occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage, the incentive 

bonus for transfer between armed forces, and the accession bonus 

for officer candidates. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

611(f)). 

The Senate recedes. 

Modification of qualifying period for payment of hostile fire and imminent danger special pay and hazardous duty special pay (sec. 

616) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 612) that 

would amend sections 310 and 351 of title 37, United States Code, 

to require that hostile fire and imminent danger pay be prorated 

according to the number of days spent in a qualifying area, rather 

than on a monthly basis regardless of the number of such days. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require 

that hostile fire and imminent danger pay that is based on presence in a qualifying area be prorated at the rate of 1/30 of the 

monthly amount for each day spent in the qualifying area. The 

amendment would authorize the payment of the full monthly 

amount of hostile fire and imminent danger pay when eligibility for 

such pay is based on actual exposure to hostile fire or a hostile 

mine explosion. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
649 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Generally 

One-year extension of authority to reimburse travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance (sec. 

621) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 621) that would extend for 1 year the authority to reimburse travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distances. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle D—Consolidation and Reform of Travel and 

Transportation Authorities 

Consolidation and reform of travel and transportation authorities of 

the uniformed services (sections 631 and 632) 

The House bill contained a series of provisions (sections 631– 

636) that would add a new chapter 8 to title 37, United States 

Code, to consolidate and reform the existing statutory authorities 

related to travel and transportation allowances for members of the 

uniformed services, their dependents, other family members, and 

authorized travelers of the Department of Defense. The provisions 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to conduct pilot programs 

to evaluate alternative travel and transportation programs, policies, and processes for Department of Defense authorized travelers. 

The Senate amendment contained similar provisions (sections 

621 and 622) that would consolidate and reform the existing statutory authorities relating to travel and transportation allowances. 

The provisions would require the Secretary of Defense and the 

other administering secretaries to establish programs of compliance 

to ensure the integrity of the defense travel system, minimize fraud 

and waste, and ensure that benefits do not exceed actual expenses 

of travel or reasonable allowances based on commercial travel 

rates. Finally, the provisions would require that all travel claims 

be processed electronically within 5 years of the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

The House recedes with clarifying amendments to the definitions contained in the provisions. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 

Discretion of the Secretary of the Navy to select categories of merchandise to be sold by ship stores afloat (sec. 641) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 644) that would provide discretionary authority to the Secretary of the Navy to determine what products will be sold by Navy ship stores. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Access of military exchange stores system to credit available through 

Federal Financing Bank (sec. 642) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 645) that would authorize the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Navy Exchange 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
650 

Service Command, and Marine Corps exchanges to issue and sell 

their obligations to the Federal Financing Bank to facilitate the 

provision of in-store credit to patrons. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Designation of Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and 

Meditation Pavilion, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, as a 

Fisher House (sec. 643) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 643) that would 

deem that the Fisher House for the Families of the Fallen and 

Meditation Pavilion at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, shall be 

considered a Fisher House for all other purposes established in law 

with regard to Fisher Houses and Fisher Suites. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1084). 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle F—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 

Death gratuity and related benefits for reserves who die during an 

authorized stay at their residence during or between successive 

days of inactive duty training (sec. 651) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 634) that 

would amend section 1475 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify 

that a reservist who receives permission to stay overnight at their 

residence during an inactive-duty training drill weekend will be entitled to the death gratuity if they die during the night between 

drilling days. The provision would be retroactive to January 1, 

2010. 

The House bill contained no similar amendment. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would remove the 

retroactive application of the provision. 

The conferees recommend that the Secretary of the Army use 

an appropriate authority, including the authority under section 127 

of title 10, United States Code, to equitably resolve certain cases 

in which reserve component members participating in inactive-duty 

training are determined not to be covered under section 1475 of 

title 10, United States Code, including cases involving deaths occurring before the date of enactment of this Act. 

Subtitle G—Other Matters 

Report on basic allowance for housing for National Guard members 

transitioning between active duty and full-time National Guard 

duty (sec. 661) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 641) that 

would require that basic allowance for housing (BAH) paid to a 

member of the National Guard not be reduced upon the transition 

of the member between full-time National Guard duty under title 

32, United States Code, and active duty under title 10, United 

States Code. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
651 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to study the implications on BAH for members of the National Guard when they transition between full-time 

National Guard duty under title 32, United States Code, and active 

duty under title 10, United States Code, taking into account current laws, policies, and practices, and the well-being of service 

members and their families. The amendment would require the 

Secretary to report to the congressional defense committees the results of this study within 5 months of the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Report on incentives for recruitment and retention of health care 

professionals (sec. 662) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 663) that would require the Surgeons General of the Army, Navy, and Air Force to 

report to Congress within 90 days of the date of enactment of this 

Act on their staffing needs for health care professionals and to provide recommendations on additional recruiting incentives needed to 

encourage experienced health care professionals to join the active 

or reserve components. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Fiscal year 2012 increase in military basic pay 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 601) that would establish a pay raise of 1.6 percent for all members of the uniformed 

services beginning January 1, 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that a 1.6 percent pay raise for all uniformed service members will become effective January 1, 2012 by 

operation of law. 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 616) that would extend for 1 year the authority to pay the health professions referral 

bonus and the Army referral bonus. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Mandatory provision of travel and transportation allowances for 

non-medical attendants for seriously ill and wounded members 

of the armed forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 622) that would require the Secretary of Defense to pay non-medical attendants per 

diem allowances or reimburse them for actual and necessary expenses. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
652 

Inclusion of members of the armed forces assigned to Egypt MultiNational Force and Observers Mission in United States Central 

Command rest and recuperation absence program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 623) that would 

amend section 705a of title 10, United States Code, to authorize 

service members serving with the Egypt Multi-National Force and 

Observers Mission to receive non-chargeable rest and recuperation 

leave and other benefits under that section. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Repeal of automatic enrollment in Family Servicemembers’ Group 

Life Insurance for members of the armed forces married to other 

members 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 631) that 

would amend section 1967 of title 38, United States Code, to remove service members from automatic enrollment as a dependent 

under the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program 

when they are insured on their own behalf under the 

Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Limitation on availability of certain funds pending report on provision of special compensation for members of the uniformed services with injury or illness requiring assistance in everyday living 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 632) that 

would limit the obligation and expenditure of travel funds of the 

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness until the Under Secretary provided to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the Department’s implementation of the caregiver compensation authority in section 439 of title 

37, United States Code, and other information. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Repeal of sense of Congress on age and service requirements for retired pay for non-regular service 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 633) that 

would repeal section 635 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees recognize that the changes to section 12731 of 

title 10, United States Code, enacted by section 647 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 

181; 122 Stat. 160) were intended to reduce the minimum age at 

which reserve component members would be eligible to begin receiving retired pay according to time spent deployed, by 3 months 

for 90-day periods, not excluding consecutive days of duty that 

span 2 fiscal years, as well as duty within the same fiscal year. 

Recognizing the increase in direct spending that such a revision 

would require, the conferees will continue to look for an opporVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00682 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
653 

tunity to revise section 12731 to ensure such periods of deployed 

service may be credited. 

Repeal of requirement of reduction of Survivor Benefits Plan survivor annuities by Dependency and Indemnity Compensation 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 635) that 

would eliminate the offset of Survivor Benefit Plan annuities by 

the amount of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation received 

from the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Expansion of use of uniform funding authority to include permanent change of station and temporary duty lodging programs 

operated through nonappropriated fund instrumentalities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 641) that would expand the use of the uniform funding authority authorized for morale, welfare, and recreation programs operated through nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to include permanent change 

of station and temporary duty lodging programs. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Contracting authority for nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to 

provide and obtain goods and services 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 642) that would clarify that nonappropriated fund instrumentalities may enter into single-year or multiyear contracts with another element of the Department of Defense, another federal agency, or a private-sector agency 

to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the military 

community and the effective management of such instrumentalities. This section also would authorize nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to participate in partnerships with private entities 

to provide programs at no cost to the government on military installations using government facilities and other government support resources. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Enhanced commissary stores pilot program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 646) that would authorize the Defense Commissary Agency to operate an enhanced 

commissary store at a military installation designated for closure 

or adverse realignment under a base closure law. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Monthly amount and duration of Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance for widows and widowers of deceased members of the 

armed forces affected by required Survivor Benefit Plan annuity 

offset for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 651) that would increase the existing monthly amounts paid under the Special Survivor Indemnity Allowance (SSIA) to surviving spouses or former 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
654 

spouses of deceased service members whose annuity under the Survivor Benefit Program is offset by the amount of Dependency and 

Indemnity Compensation they receive from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The provision would also extend the termination date 

for the SSIA from October 1, 2017, to October 1, 2021, and establish additional monthly amounts to be paid those fiscal years. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Reimbursement of American National Red Cross for humanitarian 

support and other services provided to members of the armed 

forces and their dependents 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 661) that would 

amend section 2602 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize 

the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department 

to reimburse the Red Cross for humanitarian and other support 

provided to service members and their dependents. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Treatment of members of the armed forces and civilian employees 

of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded in the 

November 5, 2009, attack at Fort Hood, Texas 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 662) that would require that a member of the armed forces killed or wounded in the 

attack at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, be treated as if 

killed or wounded in a combat zone as a result of enemy action. 

The provision would also require that a civilian employee of the 

Department of Defense killed or wounded in the attack at Fort 

Hood be treated as if killed or wounded while serving with the 

armed forces in a contingency operation and as a result of a terrorist attack. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 

Annual enrollment fees for certain retirees and dependents (sec. 701) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 701) that would express a sense of Congress regarding the extraordinary sacrifices of 

career members of the uniformed services and would limit the annual increase in TRICARE Prime enrollment fees to the amount 

equal to the percentage by which military retired pay is increased 

beginning October 1, 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

701). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

annual increase in TRICARE Prime enrollment fees to the amount 

equal to the percentage by which military retired pay is increased 

beginning October 1, 2012, and would clarify that the basis for determining increases in the TRICARE Prime enrollment fee for fisVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00684 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
655 

cal year 2013 and thereafter is the enrollment fee for retirees who 

enrolled for the first time in fiscal year 2012. 

Mental health assessments for members of the armed forces deployed in support of a contingency operation (sec. 702) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 705) that would codify, with several modifications, the existing legislative requirement 

for the Secretary of Defense to provide person-to-person mental 

health assessments for each member of the armed forces who is deployed in support of a contingency operation at specified times before and after the deployment. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would align the 

timing of the mental health assessments with the timing of required periodic health assessments. 

Behavioral health support for members of the reserve components of 

the armed forces (sec. 703) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 703) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide access to mental health 

assessments to members of the reserve components during scheduled unit training and assemblies. The provision would also require 

the Secretary to provide psychological health programs and training on suicide prevention and post-suicide response during scheduled unit training. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would make the 

requirement to provide access to mental health assessments permissive, and would require that funding for these programs be provided from operations and maintenance accounts of the reserve 

components. 

Provision of food to certain members and dependents not receiving 

inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities (sec. 704) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 702) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide food and beverages at 

no cost to certain individuals receiving outpatient care or individuals assisting with infants receiving inpatient medical care at a 

military treatment facility. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Travel for anesthesia services for childbirth for command-sponsored 

dependents of members assigned to remote locations outside the 

continental United States (sec. 705) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 711) that 

would provide temporary authority to the Secretary of Defense to 

pay travel expenses to a location in the United States for a command-sponsored dependent of a service member assigned to a remote location who requires or elects certain anesthesia services for 

childbirth. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would provide 

that transportation may not be provided under this authority if the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
656 

dependent would otherwise receive obstetrical anesthesia services 

at a military treatment facility and the medical treatment facility, 

in carrying out the required number of necessary obstetric cases, 

would not maintain competency of its obstetrical staff unless the 

facility provides such services to the dependent. 

The conferees note that, in accordance with Department of Defense procedures governing military personnel assignments, the 

military departments generally authorize curtailment of overseas 

tours for pregnancy of a service member. 

Transitional health benefits for certain members with extension of 

active duty following active duty in support of a contingency operation (sec. 706) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 712) that 

would amend section 1145(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, to 

clarify that, in the case of a reserve component member who is 

called to active duty in support of a contingency operation who 

then, without a break in service, is extended on active duty for any 

purpose, the 180-day period of Transition Assistance Management 

Program medical eligibility begins when the member is separated 

from active duty at the end of the extended active duty. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Provision of rehabilitative equipment under Wounded Warrior Act 

(sec. 707) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 733) that would 

amend section 1631 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) to authorize the Secretary 

of Defense to provide an active-duty member of the armed forces 

with a severe injury or illness with rehabilitative equipment, including recreational sports equipment, that provide an adaption or 

accommodation for the member. 

The Senate contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Transition enrollment of Uniformed Services Family Health Plan 

Medicare-eligible retirees to TRICARE for Life (sec. 708) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 704) that would prohibit a Medicare eligible military retiree from enrolling in the Uniformed Services Family Health Plan after September 30, 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 703) 

affecting Medicare eligible retired enrolling after September 30, 

2011. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Codification and improvement of procedures for mental health evaluations for members of the armed forces (sec. 711) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 713) that 

would amend chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

the Secretary of Defense to prescribe and maintain regulations reVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00686 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
657 

lating to commanding officer and supervisor referrals of members 

of the armed forces for mental health evaluations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of time limit for submittal of claims under the TRICARE 

program for care provided outside the United States (sec. 712) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 705) that 

would extend the time limit for submission of TRICARE claims for 

services provided outside the United States from 1 year to 3 years 

after the services are provided. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Expansion of State licensure exception for certain health care professionals (sec. 713) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 713) that would express the sense of Congress concerning access to behavioral health 

care and the need for improved collaboration between the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs on transition 

of service member medical records. The provision would also amend 

section 1094(d), title 10, United States Code, to permit Department 

of Defense civilian employees and other health care professionals 

credentialed and privileged at a federal health care institution or 

location designated by the Secretary of Defense to practice at any 

location, regardless of where the health care professional or the patient are located, so long as the practice is within the scope of the 

authorized federal duties. The provision would also require reports 

on plans to develop and expand programs utilizing Internet and 

communications technologies to improve access to care, and plans 

to improve the transition of health and battlefield deployment 

records from the Department to the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

721), which would limit additional State licensure exceptions to duties relating to mental health care. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment to delete the sense of 

Congress and required reports. 

Clarification on confidentiality of medical quality assurance records 

(sec. 714) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 722) that 

would amend section 1102(j) of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that medical quality assurance records are limited to records of 

any peer review activity by or for the Department of Defense to assess the quality of medical care. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Maintenance of the adequacy of provider networks under the 

TRICARE program (sec. 715) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 702) that 

would state that TRICARE network providers are not considered 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
658 

subcontractors for purposes of the Federal Acquisition Regulation 

(FAR) or any other law. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require 

that, in determining whether TRICARE network providers are subcontractors for the purposes of the FAR or any other law, a 

TRICARE managed care support contract including the requirement to establish, manage, or maintain a network of providers 

shall not be considered to be a contract for the performance of 

health care services or supplies on the basis of that requirement. 

The conferees are aware that the Administration is currently 

undertaking a review with relevant agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Labor, and Justice, to clarify the coverage of 

health care providers under federal statutes applicable to contractors and subcontractors. The conferees agree that this is a complex 

issue which merits continued review from the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

and other committees of jurisdiction in the Senate and the House 

of Representatives. 

Review of the administration of the military health system (sec. 716) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 711) that would 

amend chapter 6 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

President, with the advice and assistance of the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff, to establish a unified medical command for 

medical operations under section 161 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the options developed and considered by the 

task force established by the Deputy Secretary of Defense to review 

the governance model options for the military health system. The 

amendment would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from proceeding with restructuring the military health system until 120 

days after the Comptroller General of the United States submits a 

report to Congress on a review of the strengths, weaknesses, and 

costs of each option. 

Limitation on availability of funds for the future electronic health 

records program (sec. 717) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 712) that would limit 

the amount of funds the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend for future electronic health programs until 30 days after the 

date that the Secretary submits a report to the congressional defense committees that addresses: the architecture to guide the 

transition of the electronic health records of the Department of Defense to a future state that is cost-effective and interoperable; a 

process for selecting investments in information technology; the report required by section 715 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383); and 

the effectiveness of the Interagency Program Office. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
659 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Modification of authorities on surveys on continued viability of 

TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra (sec. 721) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 704) that 

would amend section 711 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) to extend the length 

of time the Department of Defense is required to report on access 

to health care under TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra from 

2011 until 2015, and to modify the frequency of reports required 

to be conducted by the Comptroller General from twice per year to 

once every 2 years. 

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 739). 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

Treatment of wounded warriors (sec. 722) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 724) that would add $3,000,000 to Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Army, 

for rapid clinical evaluation and deployment of novel treatment 

strategies for wounded service members with an emphasis on musculoskeletal injuries. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the Secretary of Defense to enter into partnerships to enable coordinated rapid clinical evaluation and application of evidencebased treatment strategies for wounded service members, with an 

emphasis on the most common musculoskeletal injuries that will 

address the priorities of the armed forces with respect to retention 

and readiness. 

Report on research and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder 

(sec. 723) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 735) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the benefits of neuroimaging 

research in an effort to identify and increase the diagnostic properties of post-traumatic stress disorder. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees have learned that research using neuroimaging 

techniques may offer hope in identifying conditions in the brain to 

facilitate distinct classification and diagnosis of post-traumatic 

stress. The conferees urge the Secretary to consider the potential 

benefits of research using such techniques for wounded, ill, and injured service members with post-traumatic stress and to explore 

collaborative interagency and extramural research in this area. 

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 

724) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 738) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify, refer, 

and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to members of the 

armed forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or OperVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00689 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
660 

ation Iraqi Freedom before the June, 2010, the effective date of the 

policy using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion 

to properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, a report on the policy of the Department of Defense related to 

the management of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury in 

the deployed setting (Directive Type Memorandum 09–033, ‘‘Policy 

Guidance for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Deployed Setting,’’ June 21, 2010), the effectiveness of such 

policy with respect to identifying and treating blast-related concussive injuries, and the effect of the policy on operational effectiveness in theater. 

Comptroller General report on women-specific health services and 

treatment for female members of the armed force (sec. 725) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 721) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a comprehensive review 

on the availability, efficacy, and adequacy of health care services 

for female members of the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Comptroller General to carry out a review of women specific health 

services and treatment for female members of the armed forces and 

to submit a report on this review to the congressional defense committees not later than December 31, 2012. 

Comptroller General report on contracted health care staffing for 

military medical treatment facilities (sec. 726) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 723) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives not later than March 31, 2012, a report on the contracting activities of the military departments with respect to providing health care professional services to members of the armed 

forces, dependents, and retirees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

TRICARE Standard for certain members of the Individual Ready 

Reserve 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 706) that would 

make TRICARE Standard available to members of the Retired Reserve qualified for a non-regular retirement at age 60 but who have 

not yet reached age 60 and to certain members of the Individual 

Ready Reserve. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
661 

Cooperative health care agreements 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 725) that would require the Secretary of Defense to obligate an additional $500,000 

to the Defense Health Program for cooperative health care agreements between military installations and local or regional health 

care systems. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prostate cancer imaging research initiative 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 726) that would authorize $2.0 million additional funding for prostate cancer imaging 

research initiatives. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 727) that would require the Secretary of Defense to obligate an additional $2.0 million to the Defense Health Program for the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Collaborative military-civilian trauma training programs 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 728) that would require the Secretary of Defense to obligate an additional $3.0 million to the Defense Health Program for collaborative military-civilian trauma training programs between military installations and 

local or regional health care systems. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Traumatic brain injury 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 729) that would add 

$1,000,000 to the Defense Health Program to develop national 

medical guidelines regarding the post-acute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Competitive programs for alcohol and substance abuse disorders 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 730) that would add 

$5,000,000 to the Defense Health Program to support a competitive 

program for translational research centers tasked with addressing 

alcohol and substance abuse issues. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
662 

Pilot program on payment for treatment of members of the armed 

forces and veterans for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 731) that would au- thorize to be appropriated $10.0 million to carry out a 5 year pilot 

program to pay for the treatment of traumatic brain injury and 

post-traumatic stress disorder in health care facilities other than 

military treatment facilities or Department of Veterans Affairs 

medical facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on establishment of registry on occupational and environmental chemical concerns 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 732) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report on establishing a registry 

for members of the armed forces exposed to occupational and environmental hazards during contingency operations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress on post-traumatic stress disorder 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 734) that would express the sense of Congress that post-traumatic stress disorder is 

an increasingly common disease and that treatment for service 

members with post-traumatic stress disorder should be expanded 

to include local and community medical facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Study on breast cancer among members of the armed forces and veterans 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 736) that would require the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

jointly conduct a study on the incidence of breast cancer among 

members of the armed forces (including members of the National 

Guard and reserve components) and veterans. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that in a separate provision in this report 

the Comptroller General is required to conduct a comprehensive review on the availability, efficacy, and adequacy of health care services for female members of the armed forces, including the access 

to and efficacy of women-specific breast cancer services and programs with respect to outreach, prevention, and treatment. 

Transfer of Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health 

and Traumatic Brain Injury 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 737) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop a plan to transfer the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic 

Brain Injury from the TRICARE Management Activity to a military department, as determined by the Secretary. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
663 

The House recedes. 

The conferees understand that the Department is preparing to 

move ahead with this transfer. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND

RELATED MATTERS

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Requirements relating to core depot-level maintenance and repair 

capabilities for Milestone A and Milestone B and elimination of 

references to Key Decision Points A and B (sec. 801) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 801) that would 

amend sections 2366a and 2366b of title 10, United State Code, to 

incorporate certification requirements for core logistics capabilities 

and to eliminate obsolete references to Key Decision Points A and 

B for Space Programs. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would ensure 

that life cycle sustainment planning, to include core depot-level 

maintenance and repair capabilities, is considered at applicable 

milestones for major defense acquisition programs. 

Revision to law relating to disclosures to litigation support contractors (sec. 802) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 802) that would clarify the authority of the Department of Defense to disclose sensitive 

information to litigation support contractors. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Extension of applicability of the senior executive benchmark compensation amount for purposes of allowable cost limitations 

under defense contracts (sec. 803) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 803) that would expand the limitation on allowable compensation for defense contractor employees to any individual performing under a covered 

contract. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 842) that 

would expand the limitation to contractor and subcontractor employees and reduce the ceiling amount to the annual amount paid 

to the President of the United States under section 102 of title 3, 

United States Code. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would expand the 

limitation to all contractor employees, subject to the authority of 

the Secretary of Defense to establish narrowly-targeted exceptions 

for scientists and engineers upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of Defense has continued access to needed skills and capabilities. The Secretary is directed to report to the congressional defense committees on whether there are any additional categories of employees for whom such 

authority may be needed. The conferees understand that the term 

‘‘contractor employees’’ includes employees of a subcontractor. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
664 

Extension of availability of funds in the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund (sec. 804) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 805) that would provide uniformity in the availability of funds in the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund, as requested by the Department 

of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

881). 

The Senate recedes. 

Defense Contract Audit Agency annual report (sec. 805) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 806) that would require the Director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) 

to submit an annual report to Congress. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would simplify 

the reporting requirement and ensure that it is consistent with the 

nature of the work performed by DCAA. 

Inclusion of data on contractor performance in past performance 

databases for source selection decisions (sec. 806) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 821) that 

would require the Department of Defense to develop a strategy for 

ensuring that timely, accurate, and complete information on contractor performance is included in past performance databases used 

for making source selection decisions. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment requiring that contractors be provided up to 2 weeks to respond to past performance information before it is included in the database. Nothing in the provision would preclude contractors from providing comments, or otherwise challenging the information, after the 2 week period has expired and the information has been posted. 

Implementation of recommendations of Defense Science Board Task 

Force on improvements to Service Contracting (sec. 807) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 822) that 

would require the Department of Defense to develop a plan to implement the recommendations of a Defense Science Board report on 

service contracting. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment striking language requiring a taxonomy and definitions for the tracking of contract 

services. This issue has been already addressed in previously-enacted legislation requiring an inventory of contract services. 

Temporary limitation on aggregate annual amount available for 

contract services (sec. 808) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 823) that 

would limit Department of Defense spending for contract services 

in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 (not including spending from the 

Overseas Contingency Operations account). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
665 

Annual report on single-award task and delivery order contracts 

(sec. 809) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 824) that 

would streamline reporting requirements for single-award task and 

delivery order contracts. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, 

Procedures, and Limitations 

Calculation of time period relating to report on critical changes in 

major automated information systems (sec. 811) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 811) that would clarify the trigger for determining whether a major automated information system has achieved full deployment decision in a timely manner. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment based on comments from the Department of Defense. 

Change in deadline for submission of Selected Acquisition Reports 

from 60 to 45 days (sec. 812) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 812) that would adjust the deadline for submission of Selected Acquisition Reports. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery 

order contracts (sec. 813) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 813) that would extend the sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order 

contracts. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Clarification of Department of Defense authority to purchase righthand drive passenger sedan vehicles and adjustment of threshold for inflation (sec. 814) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 814) that would clarify Department of Defense authority to purchase right-hand drive 

passenger sedans. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

884). 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

Rights in technical data and validation of proprietary data restrictions (sec. 815) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 841) that 

would clarify the treatment of independent research and development and bid and proposal costs for purposes of section 2320 of 

title 10, United States Code, governing rights in technical data. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
666 

The House recedes with an amendment that would clarify the 

circumstances in which the United States has government-purpose 

rights in technical data and the extent to which the United States 

may require the delivery of technical data to which it already has 

rights, but the delivery of which was not required in the contract. 

Covered contracts for purposes of requirements on contractor business systems (sec. 816) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 843) that 

would clarify what contracts are covered for the purposes of withholding funds under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Compliance with defense procurement requirements for purposes of 

internal controls of non-defense agencies for procurements on 

behalf of the Department of Defense (sec. 817) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 844) that 

would amend section 801 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) to clarify that when 

the Department of Defense makes purchases through non-defense 

agencies the other agencies are expected to comply with the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and other laws 

and regulations that apply to procurements by all federal agencies 

and with laws and regulations applicable to inter-agency transactions by the Department of Defense, but not with internal Department of Defense procurement rules. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts (sec. 818) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 848) that 

would strengthen the detection, avoidance, notification, and remediation of counterfeit and suspect counterfeit electronic parts in defense systems. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the authority provided to the Secretary 

of the Treasury to share information under this provision should 

not be interpreted to suggest that any other government agency 

lacks the authority to share similar information with the owner of 

a copyright or registered mark. 

Modification of certain requirements of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (sec. 819) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 841) that would 

amend certain provisions of acquisition law to provide additional 

flexibility to the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

802). 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
667 

Inclusion of contractor support requirements in Department of Defense planning documents (sec. 820) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 852) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan to 

address shortfalls in operational contract support requirements determination, management, oversight, and administration. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 866) that 

would require inclusion of contractor support requirements in Department of Defense planning documents. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the Commission on Wartime Contracting found significant deficiencies in the Department’s requirements determination processes, management, oversight, and administration of operational contract support in recent contingency 

operations. The conferees urge the Secretary of Defense to take aggressive steps to address shortfalls in education, training, information-sharing, pre-deployment exercises and experiments, and workforce planning related to the Department’s continued reliance on 

operational contract support. 

Amendment relating to buying tents, tarpaulins, or covers from 

American sources (sec. 821) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 815) that would 

amend section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, to include the 

materials and components of tents, tarpaulins, and covers under 

that provision. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment to include tent poles 

and similar structural components. 

Repeal of sunset of authority to procure fire resistant rayon fiber 

from foreign sources for the production of uniforms (sec. 822) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 817) that would repeal the sunset on the authority to procure fire resistant rayon 

fiber from foreign sources under the circumstances provided in section 829 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008 (Public Law 110–181). 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 888) that 

would require further review of the issue. 

The Senate recedes. 

Prohibition on collection of political information (sec. 823) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 847) that would prohibit federal agencies from requiring contractors to disclose information on campaign contributions and expenditures as a condition 

for participating in an acquisition. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 845) 

that would be applicable only to the Department of Defense. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
668 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition 

Programs 

Waiver of requirements relating to new milestone approval for certain major defense acquisition programs experiencing critical 

cost growth due to change in quantity purchased (sec. 831) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 801) that 

would allow the waiver of certain requirements applicable to programs that experience critical Nunn-McCurdy breaches in narrow 

circumstances where the cost growth is attributable almost exclusively to changes in the number of units to be purchased. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Assessment, management, and control of operating and support 

costs for major weapon systems (sec. 832) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 803) that 

would require the Department of Defense to take action to assess, 

manage, and control operation and support costs for major weapon 

systems. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment to ensure that the provision references, and is consistent with, the life-cycle management 

and product support requirements in section 805 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84). 

Clarification of responsibility for cost analyses and targets for contract negotiation purposes (sec. 833) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 804) that 

would clarify that the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics is responsible for policies and guidance 

on cost analyses and targets to be used in contract negotiations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Modification of requirements for guidance on management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition programs (sec. 834) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 841(b)) that would 

repeal certain requirements relating to manufacturing risk in 

major defense acquisition programs. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 805) that 

would provide the Department of Defense increased flexibility in 

complying with such requirements. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the conference agreement would authorize the Department of Defense to tailor manufacturing readiness levels and other manufacturing readiness standards to address the unique characteristics of specific industry sectors and 

weapon system portfolios. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
669 

Management of developmental test and evaluation for major defense 

acquisition programs (sec. 835) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 806) that 

would strengthen management of developmental test and evaluation for major defense acquisition programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Assessment of risk associated with development of major weapon 

systems to be procured under cooperative projects with friendly 

foreign countries (sec. 836) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 807) that 

would require a risk assessment in advance of any cooperative 

agreement with an allied nation that is expected to result in the 

award of a Department of Defense contract for the engineering and 

manufacturing development of a major weapon system. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Competition in maintenance and sustainment of subsystems of 

major weapon systems (sec. 837) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 326) that would 

amend section 202(d) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 

Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2430 note) to include subsystems and components. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Oversight of and reporting requirements with respect to Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program (sec. 838) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 889) that 

would direct the Secretary of Defense to designate the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program as a Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) not in sustainment phase under section 

2430 of title 10, United States Code, or require the EELV program 

to provide to the congressional defense committees and, as appropriate, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics, all information with respect to its cost, schedule, and 

performance that would be required if the program were an MDAP 

not in sustainment. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Implementation of acquisition strategy for Evolved Expendable 

Launch Vehicle (sec. 839) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 891) that 

would direct the Secretary of Defense to submit, with the fiscal 

year 2013 budget submission, how it is implementing the findings 

of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the 

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle, dated September 15, 2011 

(GAO–11–641) and if the findings cannot be implemented, an explanation of how the Department is addressing the deficiency. 

Within 60 days the GAO is to assess the Secretary’s report and forward recommendations it considers appropriate. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
670 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

report submission to no later than March 31, 2012. 

The conferees also agreed that the report shall be delivered to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of 

Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy in the United States Central Command theater of operations (sec. 841) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 821) that would 

allow the Secretary of Defense to void a contract, upon a determination that a foreign entity or individual performing on the contract is directly engaged in hostilities or is substantially supporting 

forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or 

its coalition partners. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

861). 

The House recedes with an amendment clarifying that the authority provided by the section is available only to the Department 

of Defense. 

Additional access to contractor and subcontractor records in the 

United States Central Command Theater of Operations (sec. 

842) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 823) that would 

allow the Secretary of Defense to examine the records of a foreign 

contractor or subcontractor in Iraq or Afghanistan under certain 

circumstances. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

862). 

The House recedes with an amendment clarifying that the authority provided by the section is available only to the Department 

of Defense. 

Reach-back contracting authority for Operation Enduring Freedom 

and Operation New Dawn (sec. 843) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 822) that would authorize a contracting activity inside the United States to utilize increased thresholds available for overseas contracting, when acting 

in support of overseas contracting for Operation Enduring Freedom 

and Operation New Dawn. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

865). 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
671 

Competition and review of contracts for property or services in support of a contingency operation (sec. 844) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 826) that would require the Department of Defense to establish, measure, and monitor goals for competition in contracts performed outside the United 

States in support of contingency operations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees understand that separate goals would be established under this section for any overseas contingency operation requiring significant contract support. While limitations on competition may be justified by urgent contracting requirements early in 

a contingency operation, the conferees expect the Department to 

transition to sustainment contracting, with increasing levels of 

competition, as rapidly as practicable. 

Inclusion of associated support services in rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for supplies (sec. 845) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 864) that 

would amend section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314) to include associated support services in the rapid acquisition procedures authorized by that section, as requested by the Department 

of Defense. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund to rapidly meet urgent operational needs (sec. 846) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 863) that 

would establish a Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund to rapidly 

meet urgent operational needs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle E—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Assessment of the defense industrial base pilot program (sec. 851) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 831) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the defense industrial base (DIB) 

pilot program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees emphasize the importance of a careful and objective assessment of the effectiveness of the DIB pilot program, since 

it could serve as a model for other critical infrastructure sectors. 

The Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3) reports that the so-called 

‘‘threat indicators’’ they have compiled for the Department of Defense networks and the defense industrial base, respectively, reflect 

a very small overlap. According to DC3, the overlap between these 

threat indicators and those of the financial sector is significantly 

smaller still. These statistics are interpreted to indicate that each 

sector is experiencing attacks from different threat actors using difVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00701 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
672 

ferent tactics and techniques. If correct, this would mean that signatures developed for one sector could have limited utility for a different sector or organization. If the intelligence community is to 

provide threat signatures to defend all of the government departments and agencies, and all of the critical infrastructure sectors, 

the resources required could be very extensive. 

The conferees request that the assessment required by this section address this specific issue. 

Strategy for securing the defense supply chain and industrial base 

(sec. 852) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 832) that would require the Secretary of Defense to assess the defense industrial base 

and develop mitigation strategies to address any gaps and 

vulnerabilities identified in the assessment. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to address industrial base and supply chain 

issues (including risks and vulnerabilities) through the sector-bysector, tier-by-tier assessment of the industrial base now underway 

and the annual industrial base report required by section 2504 of 

title 10, United States Code. 

Assessment of feasibility and advisability of establishment of rare 

earth material inventory (sec. 853) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 835) that would require the Department of Defense to develop a plan for the establishment of a rare earth material inventory. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Department to assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing 

a rare earth material inventory. 

Department of Defense assessment of industrial base for night vision image intensification sensors (sec. 854) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 890) that 

would require an assessment of the night vision image intensification sensor industrial base. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Technical amendment relating to responsibilities of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base 

Policy (sec. 855) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1086) that 

would correct an erroneous statutory reference in section 139e of 

title 10, United States Code, as added by section 896 of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(P.L. 11–383). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
673 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Clarification of jurisdiction of the United States district courts to 

hear bid protest disputes involving maritime contracts (sec. 861) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 843) that would ensure that the jurisdiction of the United States district courts to 

hear bid protest disputes involving maritime contracts is consistent 

with jurisdiction over other types of bid protests under federal law. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Encouragement of contractor Science, Technology, Engineering, and 

Math (STEM) programs (sec. 862) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 845) that would establish a preference for offerors who take steps to encourage and 

enhance undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral programs in 

science, technology, engineering, and math (‘‘STEM’’ programs). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Department of Defense to develop programs and incentives to encourage contractors to support STEM programs. 

Sense of Congress and report on authorities available to the Department of Defense for multiyear contracts for the purchase of alternative fuels (sec. 863) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 848) that would express the sense of Congress on the desirability of long-term contracting for alternative fuels. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 849) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on 

available authorities for such long-term contracting. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment combining the two 

provisions. 

Acquisition workforce improvements (sec. 864) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 849) that would foster and promote the acquisition workforce on a government-wide 

basis. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Modification of delegation of authority to make determinations on 

entry into cooperative research and development agreements 

with NATO and other friendly organizations and countries (sec. 

865) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 882) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to delegate authority 

under section 2350a of title 10, United States Code, to the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and 

the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the Secretary to delegate authority to the Under Secretary of DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00703 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
674 

fense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Research, Development, and Engineering. 

Three-year extension of test program for negotiation of comprehensive small business subcontracting plans (sec. 866) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 886) that 

would extend the test program for the negotiation of comprehensive 

small business subcontracting plans until September 30, 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

program until December 31, 2014. 

Five-year extension of Department of Defense mentor-prote ́ge ́ program (sec. 867) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 887) that 

would extend the Department of Defense mentor-prote ́ge ́ program 

through September 30, 2018. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees are aware that the Department of Defense 

(DOD) mentor-prote ́ge ́ program is the oldest of the federal mentor 

prote ́ge ́ programs, and the only one to provide appropriated funds 

for cost reimbursement for mentors that support small businesses. 

The conferees believe that this has been a valuable program to 

both the Department, as well as to small businesses and encourage 

the DOD mentor-prote ́ge ́ program to look at opportunities to align 

with the Small Business Administration (SBA) mentor-prote ́ge ́ program. Further, the conferees encourage the Department to add into 

future DOD mentor-prote ́ge ́ annual reports descriptions of efforts 

being made to align with the program standards of the SBA mentor-prote ́ge ́ program, identification of opportunities for synergy, and 

analysis of technical, legal or regulatory impediments to closer 

alignment with the program standards of the SBA mentor-prote ́ge ́

program. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Additional information on waivers under the Buy American Act by 

Department of Defense required to be included in annual report 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 850) that would 

amend section 812 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) to require that additional 

information be included in the annual report of the Department of 

Defense on Buy American waivers. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Assessment of Department of Defense contracting actions and the 

impact on small business 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 851) that would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of consolidated contracting actions relating to 

base services and construction activities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
675 

The House recedes. 

The conferees expect the Department of Defense (DOD) to 

manage its business operations in an efficient manner. At the same 

time, the conferees understand that the consolidation of contracts 

for base services and construction can have a detrimental impact 

on the ability of small businesses to compete for such contracts. 

This issue has been addressed by Congress in the Small Business 

Jobs Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–240), the Small Business Reauthorization Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–135), the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136). 

The conferees direct the Comptroller General to review DOD’s 

compliance with provisions of law and regulation addressing contract consolidation and bundling with regard to contracts for base 

services and construction. The Comptroller General’s report should 

address the scope of consolidation or bundling undertaken by the 

Department, the justification provided for such consolidation or 

bundling, and the impact of such consolidation or bundling on contracting with small business concerns. The report should also address associated issues, including the need for training, the availability of alternative contracting approaches, and any recommendations the Comptroller General may have to improve the Department’s performance in this area. 

Comptroller General assessment of government competition in the 

Department of Defense industrial base 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 833) that would require the Comptroller General to assess the effect of governmentmandated competition on the defense industrial base. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on Department of 

Defense implementation of justification and approval requirements for certain sole-source contracts 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 850) that 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to report to Congress on the implementation of section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 

111–84) by the Department of Defense (DOD). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to report to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, no later than March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2013, 

on the implementation of section 811. The Secretary’s report should 

provide, at a minimum, an assessment of the following: (1) the 

number of sole-source contracts in excess of $20.0 million that have 

been awarded to each category of 8(a) participant; (2) the dollar 

amounts associated with such contracts; (3) the justifications cited 

for the award of such sole-source contracts; (4) a description of the 

goods or services that were or are to be provided under such contracts; (5) the percentage of work on such contracts that was subcontracted by the awardee or performed by an entity other than the 

awardee; and (6) any measures taken by the Department of DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00705 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
676 

fense or the Small Business Administration to ensure that such 

contracts are not abused. 

The conferees further direct the Comptroller General to provide the committees, no later than 90 days after DOD submits the 

March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2013, reports, with his own assessment of the extent to which the Department’s implementation of 

section 811 ensures that sole-source contracts are awarded in applicable procurements only when those awards have been determined 

to be in the best interest of the Department. 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on noncompetitive 

and one-offer contracts awarded by the Department of Defense 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 847) that 

would require the Comptroller General to report to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

on non-competitive and one-offer contracts awarded by the Department of Defense during fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees direct the Comptroller General to report to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives not later than March 31 of 2013, 2014, and 2015, 

on non-competitive and one-offer contracts awarded by the Department of Defense during the preceding fiscal year. The Comptroller 

General’s reports should address the number and dollar amounts 

of non-competitive and one-offer contracts awarded, the basis for 

exceptions from competitive procedures and the adequacy of the 

justifications for such exceptions, and the impact of recent Department of Defense guidance on one-offer contracts. 

Definitions 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 824) that would define certain terms. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 844) that would exempt the Department of Defense from section 526 of the Energy 

Independence and Security Act (42 U.S.C. 17142). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Extension and expansion of small business programs of the Department of Defense 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 885) that 

would extend through September 30, 2018, the Department of defense Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program and associated programs and authorities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The SBIR program would be extended by a separate division 

of the bill. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
677 

Para-aramid fibers and yarns 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 816) that would repeal section 807 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Procurement of photovoltaic devices 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 842) that would address the circumstances in which the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 

10a–10d) applies to photovoltaic devices acquired by contractors 

and lessees under energy savings performance contracts, utility 

service contracts, private housing contracts, and land leases. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

827). 

The conference agreement does not include either provision. 

Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 826) that 

would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds for any program that creates a price evaluation adjustment that would be inconsistent with the court of appeals decision in Rothe Development 

Corporation v. Department of Defense, 545 F.3d 1023 (2008). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that the Federal Acquisition Regulation 

was revised earlier this year to eliminate the authority to establish 

such a price preference. 

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan for security contractors operating in Afghanistan and in support of other contingency operations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 825) that would establish new requirements for the oversight of private security contractors operating in Afghanistan. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees agree that Department of Defense (DOD) oversight of private security contractors in Afghanistan has been deficient, and that significant improvements are needed in this regard. 

However, the issue of oversight and accountability of contractors 

performing private security functions in areas of combat operations 

was recently addressed in section 831 of the Ike Skelton National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 

383). 

The conferees direct the Government Accountability Office to 

review the steps that DOD has taken to implement the requirements of section 831 and report to the congressional defense committees on the extent to which these changes have addressed deficiencies in the oversight of private security contractors. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
678 

Report on impact of foreign boycotts on the defense industrial base 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 834) that would require the Comptroller General to assess the impact of foreign boycotts on the defense industrial base. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

892). 

The conference report does not include either provision. 

The conferees direct the Comptroller General to assess the impact of foreign boycotts on the defense industrial base. The Comptroller General’s report should include a summary of any foreign 

boycotts that posed a material risk to the defense industrial base 

from January 2008 to the present. The report should address policies or practices adopted by foreign governments or businesses that 

are intended to penalize, disadvantage, or harm Department of Defense contractors or subcontractors because of their relationship 

with the Department. 

Reports on use of indemnification agreements 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 846) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report to the congressional defense committees on indemnification agreements with contractors. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to report to the 

congressional defense committees, not later than 90 days after the 

end of each fiscal year from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2015 on 

indemnification agreements entered with contractors in connection 

with overseas contingency operations during the preceding fiscal 

year. The Secretary’s reports should address indemnification provisions relative to wrongful death and bodily injury caused by negligence and should provide the name of each contractor, a description of the indemnification provision, and a justification for the 

agreement. 

Supplier risk management 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 804) that would require the Department of Defense to use a business credit reporting 

bureau to track existing contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers 

before and during the performance of contracts. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees encourage the Secretary of Defense to consider 

the use of business credit reporting bureaus or other sources of 

business information to assess the viability of potential offerors and 

contractors at appropriate points in the acquisition process. 

Waiver of ‘‘Buy American’’ requirement for procurement of components otherwise producible overseas with specialty metal not 

produced in the United States 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 846) that 

would allow the Secretary of Defense to waive the requirement to 

use specialty metals melted or produced inside the United States, 

if the Secretary determines that, in the absence of a waiver, both 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
679 

the metals and the products fabricated from the metals would be 

produced overseas. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND

MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Revision of defense business systems requirements (sec. 901) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 901) that would update the structure and process of the defense business systems investment review boards and clarify management and oversight responsibilities based on recent changes in the organization and management of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1002). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would combine 

the two provisions and address comments received from the Department of Defense. 

Qualifications for appointments to the position of Deputy Secretary 

of Defense (sec. 902) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 901) that 

would establish qualifications for appointments to the position of 

Deputy Secretary of Defense, to reflect the new role of the Deputy 

Secretary as Chief Management Officer of the Department. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal 

responsibility for airship programs (sec. 903) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 902) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior official 

of the Department of Defense as the official with principal responsibility for the airship programs of the Department. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Memoranda of agreement on identification and dedication of enabling capabilities of general purpose forces to fulfill certain requirements of special operations forces (sec. 904) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 903) that 

would require each secretary of a military department to enter into 

a memorandum of agreement with the Commander of U.S. Special 

Operations Command establishing the procedures by which the 

availability of the enabling capabilities of the general purpose 

forces will be synchronized with the training and deployment cycle 

of special operations forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
680 

Assessment of Department of Defense access to non-United States 

citizens with scientific and technical expertise vital to the national security interests (sec. 905) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 906) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment 

of current and potential mechanisms to permit the Department of 

Defense to employ non-United States citizens with critical scientific 

and technical skills that are vital to national security. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress on use of modeling and simulation in Department 

of Defense activities (sec. 906) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 907) that 

would establish a sense of Congress to encourage the Department 

of Defense to continue the use and enhancement of modeling and 

simulation across the spectrum of defense activities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress on ties between Joint Warfighting and Coalition 

Center and Allied Command Transformation of NATO (sec. 

907) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 908) that 

would express the sense of Congress that the successor organization to the U.S. Joint Forces Command, the Joint Warfighting and 

Coalition Center, should establish close ties with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Allied Command Transformation command. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint 

Warfare Analysis Center on personnel skills (sec. 908) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 909) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment 

of the effects of planned reductions of personnel at the Joint Warfare Analysis Center on the personnel skills to be available at the 

Center after the reductions. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning 

System (sec. 911) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 911) that would prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from finalizing its January 26, 2011, order until the FCC has resolved concerns about widespread harmful interference with Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers of the Department of Defense 

(DOD). It would further require a notice to Congress of certain 

FCC decision documents, as well as the complete final working 

group report undertaken per the January 26, 2011, order. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
681 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 913) 

that would direct the Secretary of Defense to review and assess the 

ability of national security GPS receivers to receive the signals of 

the GPS satellites without interruption or interference and determine if commercial communications services are causing or will 

cause widespread or harmful interference with national security 

GPS receivers. In the event that the review determines that commercial communications services are causing or will cause widespread or harmful interference with national security GPS receivers, the Secretary would be required to promptly notify the congressional defense committees. The provision would direct the Secretary to conduct such a review every 90 days for 2 years or until 

the Secretary determines there is no widespread or harmful interference with national security GPS receivers by commercial communications services, whichever is earlier. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would add the reporting requirements of the Senate provision as a separate subsection to the Senate provision. 

Authority to designate increments or blocks of satellites as major 

subprograms subject to acquisition reporting requirements (sec. 

912) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 912) that 

would amend section 2430a(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, to 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to designate blocks or increments of two or more space vehicles as a major subprogram for the 

purposes of acquisition reporting. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment that would 

change the word ‘‘space vehicles’’ to ‘‘satellites’’. 

Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 

Report on implementation of recommendations by the Comptroller 

General on intelligence information sharing (sec. 921) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 921) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General a report on the 

Secretary’s actions in response to the Comptroller General’s recommendations regarding intelligence information sharing. The provision also requires the Comptroller General to review the Secretary’s report and assess whether the Secretary’s actions are consistent with the recommendations. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Insider threat detection (sec. 922) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 922) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a program for information sharing protection and insider threat mitigation, and to provide the congressional defense committees regular briefings on the 

Secretary’s strategy, strategy implementation, and associated resources. In addition, annual budget submissions must include identification of the resources requested for the program. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
682 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

932). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would include 

several procedural and technical options for countering the insider 

threat that were contained in the Senate provision. 

The conferees concur with the admonishment contained in the 

Senate provision for the Department of Defense to fully integrate 

its program to counter the insider threat with its overall cybersecurity strategy and programs because of the high degree of overlap 

between the two challenges. 

Expansion of authority for exchanges of mapping, charting, and 

geodetic data to include nongovernmental organizations and 

academic institutions (sec. 923) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 921) that 

would expand the authority of the Secretary of Defense to authorize the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency to exchange or furnish mapping, charting, and geodesy data, supplies, or services to 

nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions pursuant 

to an agreement with those organizations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Ozone Widget Framework (sec. 924) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 923) that 

would require the Director of the Defense Information Systems 

Agency (DISA) to publish and maintain on the Internet the Application Programming Interface specifications, a developer’s toolkit, 

source code, and such other information on, and resources for, the 

Ozone Widget Framework that are necessary to permit individuals 

and companies to develop, integrate, and test analysis tools and applications. The provision also would require the DISA Director to 

encourage and foster the use, support, development, and enhancement of the Ozone Widget Framework itself by commercial industry. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would designate 

the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer as the responsible official for carrying out this provision, rather than the Director of DISA. 

Plan for incorporation of enterprise query and correlation capability 

into the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise (sec. 925) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 924) that 

would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence to incorporate an advanced enterprise-wide distributed query and correlation capability into the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, to conduct a pilot demonstration of such a capability, and to 

rationalize the multiple ongoing and planned deployments of largescale query and correlation systems that operate on centralized 

data stores. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would establish a 

sunset date for the pilot program of September 30, 2014. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
683 

Facilities for intelligence collection or special operations activities 

abroad (sec. 926) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 922) that 

would create a narrow exception to the current requirement in section 2682 of title 10, United States Code, that the Secretary of Defense ensures that jurisdiction over, and maintenance and repair of 

real property facilities used by an activity or agency of the Department of Defense other than a military department be exercised by 

or through a military department. The exception proposed in this 

provision would be available only for real property facilities acquired as part, or in support, of Department of Defense intelligence 

or special operations activities abroad, where security is paramount. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would establish a 

sunset date for this authority on September 30, 2015, or the date 

of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2016, whichever is later. 

Subtitle D—Total Force Management 

General policy for total force management (sec. 931) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 931) that would 

amend section 129a of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Department of Defense to establish a total force management policy which comprehensively addresses the Department’s military, civilian, and contractor workforces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would clarify the 

requirements of the provision. 

Revisions to Department of Defense civilian personnel management 

constraints (sec. 932) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 932) that would 

amend section 129 of title 10, United States Code, which prohibits 

the management of the Department of Defense civilian workforce 

on the basis of arbitrary ceilings and constraints, to ensure that 

manpower requirements are established on the basis of the total 

force management policy developed in accordance with section 129a 

of title 10, as amended. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Additional amendments relating to total force management (sec. 

933) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 933) that would 

make conforming amendments to a series of statutes to ensure that 

the total force management policy established in accordance with 

section 129a of title 10, United States Code, as amended, is considered in key workforce decisions of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
684 

Modifications of annual defense manpower requirements report (sec. 

934) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 934) that would revise the annual defense manpower requirements report required by 

section 115a, to ensure that the report addresses all components of 

the Department of Defense workforce, including the military, civilian, and contractor workforce. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 

Revisions to strategic workforce plan (sec. 935) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 935) that would 

amend section 115b of title 10, United States Code, to revise the 

requirements established in that section for a Department of Defense strategic workforce plan. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Amendments to requirement for inventory of contracts for services 

(sec. 936) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 936) that would 

make clarifying amendments to section 2330a of title 10, United 

States Code, which requires the Department to develop an inventory of contract services. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the inventory, when fully developed in 

accordance with statutory requirements, will provide the Department with useful workforce information for identifying inherently 

governmental functions inappropriately performed under contract, 

informing strategic human capital planning, and facilitating an appropriate mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel. At the 

same time, a compliant inventory will be an important acquisition 

tool, enabling the Department to better leverage its buying power, 

rationalize its supplier base, foster competitive procurements, and 

ensure the best value for the taxpayers’ dollar. 

The conferees are disappointed that the Department has yet to 

take the steps needed to achieve full compliance with the statutory 

requirements. The conferees are encouraged by the Department’s 

recent development of a plan to achieve such compliance and urge 

the Department to implement this plan as rapidly and completely 

as practicable. 

Preliminary planning and duration of public-private competitions 

(sec. 937) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 938) that would 

amend section 2461 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify when 

‘‘preliminary planning’’ begins for the purpose of public-private 

competitions governed by that provision. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
685 

Conversion of certain functions from contractor performance to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 938) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 939) that would 

amend section 2463 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify the 

requirements for conversion of functions from contractor performance to performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would clarify the 

provision. 

The conferees expect the use of insourcing to be focused, in accordance with the total force management policy developed in accordance with section 129a of title 10, United States Code, as 

amended, on ensuring appropriate government capacity to perform 

acquisition workforce and other critical government functions. The 

conferees note that section 7.503 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation states that contracts ‘‘shall not be used for the performance of 

inherently governmental functions.’’ 

Subtitle E—Quadrennial Roles and Missions and Related Matters 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff assessment of contingency 

plans (sec. 941) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 954) that would 

amend section 153 of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to submit an assessment of 

combatant command contingency plans. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Quadrennial defense review (sec. 942) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 955) that would 

amend section 118 of title 10, United States Code, to modify language specifying that the review’s recommendations should not be 

constrained by the Department of Defense’s budget request. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would strike the 

sense of Congress and modify language regarding the review’s recommendations. 

The conferees note that the report accompanying the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) is an important strategic document intended to be based upon an analysis unconstrained by the budgetary environment. The conferees emphasize that the QDR should 

allow Congress to assess the levels of acceptable strategic risk and 

then evaluate the extent to which the Department of Defense’s 

budget request achieves the objectives associated with the national 

security strategy and national military strategy. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Activities to improve multilateral, bilateral, and regional cooperation regarding cybersecurity (sec. 951) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 963) that would establish a cybersecurity fellowship program within the Department 

of Defense that would allow for the temporary assignment of a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
686 

member of the military force of a foreign country to a Department 

of Defense organization for the purpose of assisting the member to 

obtain education and training to improve the member’s ability to 

understand and respond to information security threats, 

vulnerabilities of information security systems, and the consequences of information security incidents. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Report on United States Special Operations Command structure 

(sec. 952) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 964) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a study of the United States Special Operations 

Command subunified structure. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Strategy to acquire capabilities to detect previously unknown cyber 

attacks (sec. 953) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 931) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement 

a strategy to acquire advanced threat discovery capabilities to complement current cybersecurity systems that depend heavily on advance knowledge of specific attacks. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Military activities in cyberspace (sec. 954) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 962) that would clarify that the Secretary of Defense has the authority to conduct clandestine cyberspace activities in support of military operations pursuant to the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (Public 

Law 107–40; title 50 United States Code, section 1541 note) outside 

of the United States or to defend against a cyber attack on an asset 

of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment. 

The conferees recognize that because of the evolving nature of 

cyber warfare, there is a lack of historical precedent for what constitutes traditional military activities in relation to cyber operations and that it is necessary to affirm that such operations may 

be conducted pursuant to the same policy, principles, and legal regimes that pertain to kinetic capabilities. 

The conferees also recognize that in certain instances, the most 

effective way to deal with threats and protect U.S. and coalition 

forces is to undertake offensive military cyber activities, including 

where the role of the United States Government is not apparent or 

to be acknowledged. The conferees stress that, as with any use of 

force, the War Powers Resolution may apply. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
687 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of 

the Navy and Marine Corps 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 902) that would redesignate the name of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Additionally, the article would 

redesignate the titles of the Secretary of the Navy, the Under Secretary of the Navy, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and the 

General Counsel of the Navy. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Modification of temporary suspension of public-private competitions 

for conversion of Department of Defense functions to contractor 

performance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 937) that would lift 

the temporary suspension of public-private competitions that was 

included in section 325 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees recognize that the conduct of public-private competitions can be a useful tool for implementing total force management decisions. However, the conferees note that the Department 

has not yet complied with the statutory requirements for an inventory of contract services. The conferees conclude that the appropriate use of public-private competition is predicated on a sound 

planning process and the availability of accurate information, including the information that would be supplied by a compliant inventory. 

Assessment of appropriate Department of Defense and contractor 

personnel for the Defense Medical Readiness Training Institute 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 940) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment of the appropriate mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to 

carry out the mission of the Defense Medical Readiness Training 

Institute. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that elsewhere in this Act the Secretary is 

required to establish policies and procedures for determining the 

most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian and 

contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of 

Defense. The conferees expect that the Secretary will implement 

such policies across all programs, including medical readiness 

training programs. 

Transfer of provisions relating to quadrennial roles and missions 

review 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 951) that would 

amend title 10, United States Code, to transfer the requirement for 

the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to conduct an assessment 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
688 

of the roles and missions of the armed forces from section 118n to 

section 153, and to enhance the Chairman’s role in advising the 

Secretary of Defense on the assignment of functions of the armed 

forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees urge the Secretary of Defense to use the Quarterly Roles and Missions Review (QRMR) required by section 118b 

of title 10, United States Code, to identify capability gaps and 

areas of unnecessary duplication. The conferees believe that 

QRMR, if conducted as intended, would provide a solid basis for reducing waste while also improving the joint warfighting capability 

of the Department of Defense. 

Revisions to the quadrennial roles and missions review 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 952) that would 

amend section 118b of title 10, United States Code, to modify the 

requirements of the Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Amendment to presentation of future-years budget and Comptroller 

General report on budget justification material 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 953) that would 

amend section 222(b) of title 10, United States Code, to include the 

functions of each of the armed forces as identified under the most 

recent Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review. This section also 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to review Department of Defense regulations, policies, and guidance 

governing the construction of budget exhibits and to provide recommendations for their improvement. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the Secretary of Defense has not complied with the requirement in section 222 of title 10, United States 

Code, to present the future-years budget by core mission areas 

identified as a result of the Quarterly Roles and Missions Review. 

The conferees note also that it is difficult to relate how the Department’s annual budget request, including the future-years defense 

program, supports the services’ core missions and functions as determined by the Quarterly Roles and Missions Review. The conferees will continue to seek a better understanding of the budgetary challenges associated with aligning and communicating how 

requested resources support core missions and functions. 

Deadline revision for report on foreign language proficiency 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 961) that would 

modify the date on which an annual report on language proficiency 

is submitted. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. The conferees agree to include such 

changes in the subtitle of the bill regarding repeal and modification 

of reporting requirements. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
689 

Sense of Congress regarding the performance of commercially-available activities by Department of Defense civilian employees 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 965) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the performance of commercially-available activities by Department of Defense civilian employees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Clarification of status of participants of defense industrial base active cyber defense pilot project 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 966) that would establish that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, any nongovernment entity or personnel participating in the defense industrial base active cyber defense pilot project shall not be considered 

an agent of the government. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees are aware that programs like the defense industrial base active cyber defense pilot are important components of 

the Department of Defense’s (DOD) cyber defense strategy. The 

conferees are also aware that information sharing is critical to 

making pilots like this, and overall cyber defense strategy, effective. The conferees believe that there are issues that may be impeding better information sharing of threats and vulnerabilities by 

industry, resulting in concerns that industry may be acting as 

agents of the government. 

Therefore, the conferees direct the DOD Chief Information Officer to brief the congressional defense committees 90 days after 

the enactment of this Act on any issues impeding industry’s ability 

to share cyber threat or vulnerability information with the government, and any recommendations for addressing those concerns. 

Expansion of oversight offices in Department of Defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 967) that would require the establishment of a new Senate-confirmed position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Contingency Contracting and a 

new Office of Contingency Contracting. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on the manufacturing policy of the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099L) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on the manufacturing industry of the United States. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Commercial space launch cooperation 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 911) that 

would recommend as stated in the Senate report accompanying S. 

1235 (S. Rept. 112–26) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 a ‘‘provision that would facilitate cooperation 

between the private sector and the Department of Defense (DOD) 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
690 

in using DOD space transportation infrastructure. The provision 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to maximize the use of 

the space transportation infrastructure by the private sector, and 

maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of DOD’s use of the infrastructure, reduce costs, and encourage commercial space activities 

through the use of contracts or other cooperative agreements. The 

DOD would be authorized to enter into such contracts or agreements with private sector entities to provide or receive specific 

space launch and reentry range support and services. Before entering into any such contracts or agreements the Secretary would 

have to determine that such contract or agreement is in the best 

interest of the government, would not interfere with DOD requirements and would not compete with commercial space entities, unless the competition is in the national security interest of the 

United States. Pursuant to a contract or agreement, which must be 

managed in accordance with DOD procurement regulations, the 

Secretary of Defense could accept funds, services, or equipment to 

enable participation in joint space transportation infrastructure improvements with the private sector. The provision would also establish an account in the Treasury of the United States into which the 

Secretary would deposit any funds received. In addition, the Secretary would submit to the congressional defense committees an 

annual report describing how any funds, equipment, or services 

were used during the preceding fiscal year.’’ 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees ask that the Department of Defense submit legislation that does not have mandatory scoring associated with the 

acceptance of funds by private entities and consider other processes 

or authorities in statute to accomplish this objective. 

Enhancement of authorities relating to the United States Northern 

Command and other combatant commands 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1607) that 

would designate the United States Northern Command and the 

United States Pacific Command as the combatant commands principally responsible for the support of civil authorities in the United 

States by the armed forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

General transfer authority (sec. 1001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1001) that would 

provide the Department with general transfer authority totaling 

$4.0 billion in fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1001) that would provide the Department with $5.0 billion in general transfer authority. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment providing the Department with $4.0 billion in general transfer authority and a provision 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
691 

that allows the Secretary of Defense to transfer up to $125.0 million to the Secretary of Energy from amounts appropriated to the 

Department of Defense, for weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1002) that would determine the budgetary effects of this Act. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 4). 

The Senate recedes. 

Additional requirements relating to the development of Financial 

Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan (sec. 1003) 

The House bill contained two provisions that would address 

the Department of Defense’s Financial Improvement Audit Readiness (FIAR) plan and report. The first provision (sec. 1066) would 

require that the report include additional detail on subordinate activities and interim milestones for audit readiness. The second provision (sec. 1067) would require the Secretary of Defense to develop 

a corrective action plan to address weaknesses and deficiencies in 

the execution of the FIAR plan. 

The Senate bill also contained two provisions that would address the FIAR plan and report. The first provision (sec. 1005) 

would require that the Department achieve a complete and validated full Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR statements) by 

no later than September 30, 2014. The second provision (sec. 1006) 

would require the Department to develop a plan, including interim 

objectives and milestones for achieving this objective. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would combine 

the House and Senate provisions. The conference amendment 

would require the Department to establish a specific plan, with interim objectives and milestones, for meeting the September 30, 

2014, deadline for audit-ready SBR statements, to develop metrics 

and mitigating strategies for missed milestones and program 

delays, and to report to Congress on the steps taken and to be 

taken. 

Today’s challenging fiscal environment requires that management decisions be based on sound and reliable financial data. For 

this reason, the conferees are concerned that the Department’s financial management remains on the Government Accountability 

Office’s High Risk List of government programs and activities that 

are subject to waste and mismanagement. Achieving audit-ready 

SBR statements by the 2014 deadline would be a significant accomplishment and an important milestone on the Department’s path to 

achieving full audit-readiness by the 2017 statutory deadline. 

While achieving a clean audit opinion is a necessary step toward removing the Department’s financial management from the 

High Risk list, it is far from sufficient. To be meaningful, a clean 

audit statement must be repeatable. For this reason, the conference amendment would require that the Department’s FIAR 

plan be based on improvements to the Department’s business processes and controls as well as efforts to modernize its business systems to a degree sufficient for the Department to prepare timely, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
692 

reliable, and complete financial management information on a repeatable basis. 

Display of procurement of equipment for the reserve components of 

the armed forces under estimated expenditures for procurement 

in future-years defense programs (sec. 1003A) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1606) that 

would require the Department of Defense, in its future-years defense program submitted with its annual budget request, to display 

separately the estimated expenditures and item quantities for each 

reserve component of the armed forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that this provision would display estimated 

expenditures and item quantities that are included in the service 

budgets. The future-years defense program budget information for 

reserve components procurement is already available to Congress 

in the Department’s detailed budget justification materials (Exhibit 

P–40, Budget Item Justification Sheet) as prepared by the military 

departments and submitted with the annual budget request. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law 

enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities 

(sec. 1004) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1011) that would extend, by 1 year, the support by joint task forces under section 

1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2004 (Public Law 108–136), as most recently amended by section 

1012(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1014) that also would prohibit the Department from utilizing this 

authority until it complies with section 1012(b) of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. 

The House recedes. 

Three-year extension and modification of authority of Department of 

Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities 

of other governmental agencies (sec. 1005) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1012) that would extend, by 1 year, the authority of the Department of Defense to provide additional support to counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies under section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1011) that would extend, by 5 years, the authority of the Department of Defense to provide additional support to counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies under section 1004 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991. The Senate amendment also would modify the authorized recipients of support under this authority to include tribal law enforcement entities, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
693 

as defined by section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

authority for 3 years and would incorporate definitions for ‘‘Indian 

tribe,’’ ‘‘tribal government,’’ and ‘‘tribal law enforcement agency’’. 

Two-year extension and expansion of authority to provide additional 

support to counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments 

(sec. 1006) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1013) that would extend, by 1 year, the authority to provide support for counterdrug 

activities of certain foreign governments under subsection (a)(2) of 

section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85), as most recently amended by section 1014(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1012) that 

would extend, by 5 years, the authority to provide support for 

counterdrug activities of certain foreign governments under subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 1998, as most recently amended by section 1014(a) of the Ike Skelton NDAA for Fiscal Year 2011. The 

provision also would amend subsection (e)(2) of section 1033 of the 

NDAA for Fiscal Year 1998 by increasing the authorized maximum 

annual amount of support to $100.0 million, and would amend subsection (b) of section 1033 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 1998 to expand the list of countries eligible to receive support to include the 

Governments of Benin, Cape Verde, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, 

Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Liberia, Mauritania, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and Togo. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend, by 

2 years, the authority to provide support for counterdrug activities 

of certain foreign governments, increase the authorized maximum 

annual amount of support to $100.0 million, and expand the list of 

countries authorized to receive assistance under this authority to 

match the Senate amendment. 

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1007) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1014) that would extend, by 1 year, the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism 

campaign in the Republic of Colombia under section 1021 of the 

Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1015). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counterdrug activities (sec. 1008) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1013) that 

would extend, by 1 year, the reporting requirement on expenditures 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
694 

to support foreign counterdrug activities under section 1022(a) of 

the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398), as amended. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Budgeting for construction of naval vessels (sec. 1011) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1021) that would 

modify section 231 of title 10, United States Code, to change the 

requirement for a report and certification by the Secretary of Defense to an annual basis. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Sense of Congress on naming of Naval vessel after United States 

Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta (sec. 1012) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1022) that would encourage the Secretary of the Navy to name the next available naval 

vessel after United States Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with amendment to state the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy should name the next available naval vessel after Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. 

Limitation on availability of funds for placing Maritime 

Prepositioning Ship squadrons on reduced operating status (sec. 

1013) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1021) that 

prohibits the authorization of funds for placing a Maritime 

Prepositioning Ship squadron (MPSRON) on reduced operating status until Congress receives a report from the Secretary of Defense, 

the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Commandant of the Marine 

Corps which assesses the impact on military readiness for placing 

any MPSRON, or component thereof, on reduced operating status. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels 

of the Navy (sec. 1014) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1024) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on the policies and practices of the Navy for naming vessels 

of the Navy. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Transfer of certain high-speed ferries to the Navy (sec. 1015) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1026) that 

would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to provide up to $35.0 

million to the Maritime Administration of the Department of 

Transportation for the transfer by the Maritime Administration to 

the Department of the Navy of jurisdiction and control over the two 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
695 

high-speed ferries. The Maritime Administration currently holds 

title to these two vessels due to the bankruptcy of the former operator of these vessels. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Modification of conditions on status of retired aircraft carrier exJohn F. Kennedy (sec. 1016) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1022) that 

would amend section 1011 of the John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) to 

allow the Navy to dispose of the ex-John F. Kennedy. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Assessment of stationing of additional DDG–51 class destroyers at 

Naval Station Mayport, Florida (sec. 1017) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1025) requiring an assessment of the stationing of additional DDG–51 class 

destroyers at Naval Station Mayport, Florida. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States 

to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use 

of Military Force (sec. 1021) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1034) that would affirm that the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with 

al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1031) that 

would affirm the authority of the Armed Forces of the United 

States to detain certain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40). The provision 

would not affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United 

States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the 

United States. 

The House recedes. 

Military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists (sec. 1022) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1032) that 

would require military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists who 

are captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), subject to a 

national security waiver. Under the provision, the President would 

have broad authority to issue implementation procedures, including 

but not limited to deciding who makes a determination of coverage, 

how the determination is made, and when it is made. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment providing that nothing 

in this provision shall be construed to affect the existing criminal 

enforcement and national security authorities of the Federal BuVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00725 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
696 

reau of Investigation or any other domestic law enforcement agency 

with regard to a covered person, regardless whether such covered 

person is held in military custody. The law enforcement and national security tools that would not be affected in any way by this 

provision include, but would not be limited to, Grand Jury subpoenas, national security letters, and actions pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Public Law 95–511). The 

amendment would also authorize the President, rather than the 

Secretary of Defense, to waive the requirements of the provision. 

The conferees note that while section 1021 of this bill would 

apply to ‘‘al Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,’’ this section would apply to ‘‘al Qaeda or an associated force 

that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of al 

Qaeda.’’ The conferees agree that while the Taliban is covered by 

section 1021, it is not covered by this section. 

Procedures for periodic detention review of individuals detained at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 

1023) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1036) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to review the 

detention of each individual detained at Guantanamo. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1035) that 

would require the Secretary to submit to Congress a report on procedures for implementing the periodic review process required by 

Executive Order No. 13567 for such detainees. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would clarify that 

the periodic review process applies to any individual who is detained as an unprivileged enemy belligerent at Guantanamo at any 

time on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The conferees understand that the review process established 

by the Executive Order is not a legal proceeding and does not create any discovery rights in the detainee, his personal representative, or private counsel. For this reason, the conferees expect the 

procedures established under this section to provide that: (1) the 

compilation of information for the review process should be conducted in good faith, but does not create any rights on behalf of the 

detainee; (2) the mitigating information to be provided to the detainee is information compiled in the course of this good faith compilation effort; (3) the decision whether to permit the calling of witnesses and the presentation of statements by persons other than 

the detainee is discretionary, and not a matter of right; and (4) access to classified information on the part of private counsel is subject to national security constraints, clearance requirements, and 

the availability of resources to review and clear relevant information. 

Procedures for status determinations (sec. 1024) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1036) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to establish procedures for 

determining the status of persons captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

(Public Law 107–40), including access to a military judge and a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
697 

military lawyer for an enemy belligerent who will be held in longterm detention. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment clarifying that the Secretary of Defense is not required to apply the procedures for longterm detention in the case of a person for whom habeas corpus review is available in federal court. 

Because this provision is prospective, the Secretary of Defense 

is authorized to determine the extent, if any, to which such procedures will be applied to detainees for whom status determinations 

have already been made prior to the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

The conferees expect that the procedures issued by the Secretary of Defense will define what constitutes ‘‘long-term’’ detention 

for the purposes of subsection (b). The conferees understand that 

under current Department of Defense practice in Afghanistan, a 

detainee goes before a Detention Review Board for a status determination 60 days after capture, and again 6 months after that. The 

Department of Defense has considered extending the period of time 

before a second review is required. The conferees expect that the 

procedures required by subsection (b) would not be triggered by the 

first review, but could be triggered by the second review, in the discretion of the Secretary. 

Requirement for national security protocols governing detainee communications (sec. 1025) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1035) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a national security protocol governing communications and related issues for 

each individual detained at Guantanamo. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to develop and submit a single national security protocol including policies and procedures governing communications and related issues for individuals detained at Guantanamo. 

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the 

United States to house detainees transferred from United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1026) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1037) that would 

prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 

2012 to build any facility in the United States to house Guantanamo detainees. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1034). 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 

Bay, Cuba (sec. 1027) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1039) that would 

prohibit the use of fiscal year 2012 Department of Defense funds 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
698 

to bring Guantanamo detainees, or any other individuals detained 

by the Department of Defense overseas pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), to the United 

States. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would continue 

for fiscal year 2012 the prohibition on the use of Department of Defense funds to bring Guantanamo detainees to the United States. 

Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees 

at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities (sec. 1028) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040) that would 

continue for another year the certification requirements for transfer of Guantanamo detainees to foreign countries and other foreign 

entities and modify the requirements. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1033) that 

would continue the existing requirements for another year and authorize the Secretary of Defense to waive certain certification requirements in the interest of national security if alternative actions 

are taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirements. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Requirement for consultation regarding prosecution of terrorists 

(sec. 1029) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1042) that would require the Attorney General to consult with the Director of National 

Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense before initiating the prosecution in federal court of an alien for a terrorist offense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

consultation requirement to: (1) a person who is determined to be 

a foreign al Qaeda terrorist pursuant to the requirements of section 

1022 of this bill; and (2) any other person who is held in military 

detention outside of the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40). 

Clarification of right to plead guilty in trial of capital offense by 

military commission (sec. 1030) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1033) that would 

clarify the right of a defendant to plead guilty in a trial of a capital 

offense by a military commission. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1037). 

The Senate recedes. 

Counterterrorism operational briefing requirement (sec. 1031) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1041) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide quarterly briefings to the 

congressional defense committees outlining Department of Defense 

counterterrorism operations not later than March 1, 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
699 

National security planning guidance to deny safe havens to alQaeda and its violent extremist affiliates (sec. 1032) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1045) that would require the President to issue national security planning guidance to 

deny safe havens to al Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates 

and strengthen at-risk states. The provision would require the submission of the guidance to Congress and would also require that 

the agencies involved in executing the guidance enter into a memorandum of understanding related to the implementation of the 

guidance. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would strike: the 

findings, the requirement to submit any issued guidance to Congress, the requirement for memorandums of understanding between agency heads, and requirement to update and review the 

memorandums of understanding. 

While the conferees struck the requirement to provide the 

guidance to Congress, the conferees expect to be briefed on the 

guidance issued by the President. 

Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism 

(sec. 1033) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1032) that would extend the authority for the Secretary of Defense to offer and make 

rewards to a person providing information or nonlethal assistance 

to U.S. Government personnel or government personnel of allied 

forces participating in a combined operation with U.S. Armed 

Forces through fiscal year 2014 and change the annual reporting 

timeline from December to February. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend, for 

2 years, the underlying authority, shift the due date of the annual 

reporting timeline from December to February, and adjust the elements of the annual reporting requirement. 

Amendments relating to the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (sec. 

1034) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1042) that 

would make technical corrections to the Military Commissions Act 

of 2009 (Title XVIII of Public Law 111–84), as requested by the Department of Defense. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle E—Nuclear Forces 

Biennial assessment and report on the delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and the nuclear command and control system 

(sec. 1041) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1051) that would 

amend chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, to require (as 

stated in the House report accompanying H.R. 1540 (H. Rept. 112– 

78) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012) 

that the ‘‘director of the Strategic Systems Program, U.S. Navy, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
700 

commander of the Global Strike Command, U.S. Air Force, and 

Commander, U.S. Strategic Command to each complete an assessment of the safety, security, reliability, sustainability, performance, 

and military effectiveness for each type of nuclear weapons delivery 

platform and the nuclear command and control system of the 

United States within their direct responsibility. This section would 

further require that these assessments be submitted to the Secretary of Defense and Nuclear Weapons Council not later than December 1 of each year, along with several other reporting requirements. The Secretary of Defense would then be required to submit 

to the President each report along with any comments that the Secretary considers appropriate, not later than March 1 of each year. 

Finally, the President shall forward to Congress the reports provided by the Secretary of Defense along with any comments the 

President considers appropriate. The first submissions to Congress 

would be required by March 15, 2012.’’ 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1073) that requires (as stated in the Senate report accompanying 

S. 1235 (S. Rept. 112–26) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012) ‘‘that the Secretary of Defense in each 

odd-numbered year, to conduct an assessment of the safety, security, reliability, sustainability, performance, and military effectiveness of each type of U.S. platform for the delivery of nuclear weapons and of the nuclear command and control system.’’ 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would change the 

House provision to a biennial reporting requirement with the first 

report due 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Plan on implementation of the New START Treaty (sec. 1042) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1052) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of the Navy, the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Commander 

of the United States Strategic Command to submit a report no 

later than December 12, 2011, with a plan for the Department of 

Defense to implement the nuclear force reductions, limitations, and 

verification and transparency measures contained in the New 

START Treaty, and would require a Comptroller General review of 

such plan. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would change the 

reporting requirement to 30 days after date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and 

nuclear weapons command and control system (sec. 1043) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1053) that would require the President to submit an annual report to relevant congressional committees on plans for the modernization of the nuclear 

weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, and nuclear weapons 

delivery platforms. The report would be required to include a detailed description of the plan to enhance the safety, security, and 

reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile; to modernize the nuclear weapons complex; to maintain, modernize, or replace the deVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00730 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
701 

livery platforms for nuclear weapons; and to retire, dismantle, or 

eliminate any covered nuclear system. The report would also be required to include a detailed estimate of the costs associated with 

such plans. The report would be required to be submitted in unclassified form, but could include a classified annex. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

report to also include plans to sustain and modernize the nuclear 

weapons command and control system. 

Sense of the Congress on nuclear force reductions (sec. 1044) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1054) that would express the sense of Congress that any reduction in the nuclear 

forces of the United States should be supported by a thorough assessment of the strategic environment, threat, and policy, as well 

as the technical and operational implications of such reductions. 

This section would also state that specific criteria are necessary to 

guide future decisions regarding further reductions in such nuclear 

forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would strike the 

findings of the House provision. 

Nuclear force reductions (sec. 1045) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1055) that would 

limit the obligation of amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

otherwise made available to the Department of Defense or the Department of Energy for any of the fiscal years 2011 through 2017, 

to retire, dismantle, eliminate, or remove from deployed status any 

covered nuclear system of the United States as required by the 

New START Treaty. The provision would allow the Secretary of 

Defense and the Secretary of Energy to jointly waive this limitation 

if they submit written notice to the congressional defense committees of the status of carrying out the modernization plan described 

in the most recent report required by section 1053 of the House bill 

H.R. 1540 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012. If the written notice describes that the modernization 

plan is being carried out, no funds could be obligated or expended 

for a period of 30 days following the date on which the President 

submits the report required by section 1053 of the House bill describing the proposed retirement, dismantlement, or elimination. If 

the notice describes that the modernization plan is not being carried out, no funds could be obligated or expended for a period of 

180 days following the date on which the President submits the report required by section 1053 of the House bill. The House provision contained an exception to this limitation for any activities determined by the Secretary of Defense to be necessary to ensure the 

continued safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons 

stockpile. 

The House provision further prohibited the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy from obligating or expending 

amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to their departments to retire, dismantle, or eliminate any non-deployed strategic 

or non-strategic nuclear weapon until 90 days after the Secretary 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
702 

of Energy submits written certification to the congressional defense 

committees that the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR–NF) and the Uranium Processing 

Facility (UPF) are fully operational; that CMRR–NF and the Plutonium Facility–4 are together able to deliver to the nuclear weapons 

stockpile not less than a total of 80 pits per year; that the UPF is 

able to deliver to the nuclear weapons stockpile not less than 80 

refurbished or new canned subassemblies per year; and that the 

nuclear security enterprise has a capacity that supports two simultaneous life extension programs. The provision includes an exception such that this limitation would not apply to the dismantlement 

of legacy warheads that are awaiting dismantlement, or have been 

designated for retirement, on the date of enactment, and a further 

exception that this limitation would not apply to activities determined by the Secretary of Defense to be necessary to ensure the 

continued safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons 

stockpile. 

The House provision contained a third limitation that would 

prohibit the President from unilaterally retiring, dismantling, or 

eliminating—or preparing to retire, dismantle, or eliminate—any 

nuclear weapon of the United States if such action would reduce 

the number of nuclear weapons to a level that is less than that described in the New START Treaty, unless such action is required 

by a treaty or international agreement approved with the advice 

and consent of the Senate or such action is specifically authorized 

by an Act of Congress. The House provision would include an exception to this limitation for activities determined by the Secretary 

of Defense to be necessary to ensure the continued safety, security, 

and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1047) that would require the President, as soon as practicable after 

the date on which the President makes a proposal to reduce the 

number of deployed nuclear weapons below the level prescribed in 

the New START Treaty or a proposal to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the hedge stockpile, to submit to the congressional defense committees a net assessment. The net assessment 

would be required to compare and assess the current and proposed 

nuclear forces of the United States with those of other countries to 

determine whether the proposed U.S. nuclear forces would be capable of meeting U.S. objectives of nuclear deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance of allies, and defense. The Senate provision 

would include an exception to the requirement for a net assessment 

if the reduction is associated with routine stockpile stewardship activities. 

The Senate amendment also contained a provision (sec. 1074) 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to 

the congressional defense committees, by March 1, 2012, and annually thereafter, on the nuclear weapons stockpile of the United 

States. The report would be required to include an accounting of 

all of the weapons in the stockpile at the end of the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report and the planned force levels for 

each category of nuclear weapon over the course of the future-years 

defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 

10, United States Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
703 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would express 

the sense of Congress that the United States is committed to maintaining a safe, secure, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrent; the 

United States should undertake and support an enduring stockpile 

stewardship program and maintain and modernize nuclear weapons production capabilities to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the U.S. nuclear deterrent and to meet requirements for hedging against possible international developments 

or technical problems; the United States should maintain nuclear 

weapons laboratories and plants to preserve the intellectual infrastructure, competencies, and skill sets; and the United States 

should provide the necessary resources to achieve these goals and 

use as a starting point the funding levels set forth in the President’s 10-year plan provided to Congress pursuant to section 1251 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84). 

The conference agreement would also require the President to 

submit a report to Congress each year in which the President determines that the appropriations provided fail to meet the resource 

requirements set forth in the plan referred to in section 1251 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111–84) or if the President determines that more resources 

are required to carry out such plan than were estimated in the report referred to in section 1251 of Public Law 111–84. The report 

required by the conference agreement would include a plan to address the resource shortfall identified by the President; if more resources are required, the level of funding needed and a detailed explanation of the purpose for the additional resources; any effects of 

the shortfall or need for additional resources on the safety, security, reliability, or credibility of U.S. nuclear forces; and an explanation of whether any planned reductions in U.S. nuclear forces 

are still in the national interest of the United States given the resource shortfall or the need for additional resources. 

The conference agreement would also express a sense of Congress that sustained investments in the nuclear weapons stockpile 

and the nuclear security complex are needed to ensure a safe, secure, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrent and that such investments could enable additional reductions in the hedge stockpile in 

the future. The conference agreement further requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense 

committees, by March 1, 2012, and annually thereafter, on the nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States. The report would be 

required to include an accounting of all of the weapons in the 

stockpile at the end of the fiscal year preceding the submission of 

the report and the planned force levels for each category of nuclear 

weapon over the course of the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

Finally, the conference agreement would, in any year in which 

the President makes a proposal to reduce the number of nuclear 

weapons in the active or inactive stockpiles of the United States to 

a level that is lower than the level on the date of enactment of this 

Act, require the Commander of U.S. Strategic Command to conduct 

a net assessment of the current and proposed nuclear forces of the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
704 

United States and of other countries to determine whether the proposed U.S. nuclear forces would be capable of meeting U.S. objectives of nuclear deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance of allies, and defense. The Secretary of Defense would be required to 

submit the Commander’s unaltered net assessment, together with 

any explanatory views of the Secretary, to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. In 

any such year, the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration would also be required to submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

a report describing the current capacities of the U.S. nuclear weapons infrastructure to respond to strategic developments or technical 

problems in the nuclear weapons stockpile. The conference agreement would include an exception to these requirements for any reductions that are a direct result of activities associated with routine stockpile stewardship—including stockpile surveillance, logistics, or maintenance—and for any nuclear weapons that are retired 

or awaiting dismantlement on the date of enactment of this Act. 

These requirements would terminate on December 31, 2017. 

Nuclear employment strategy of the United States (sec. 1046) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1056) that would 

have prohibited the President from making any changes to the nuclear employment strategy of the United States unless the President submitted a report to Congress describing the implications of 

such changes, certified that such changes do not require a change 

in targeting strategy from counterforce to counter value targeting, 

and certified that such proposed changes preserve the nuclear force 

structure triad. The President would have been required to wait a 

period of 90 days from submission of such report until changes to 

the nuclear employment strategy may be made. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1075) which would not have conditioned changes in the nuclear employment guidance, but which required reporting to Congress after 

a change. 

The House, encouraged by a letter that Chairmen Buck 

McKeon and Michael Turner received from the Secretary of Defense on November 2, 2011, and having received further assurances 

from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, recedes with an amendment that would require a report to be submitted concurrently with 

the issuance by the President of a modified employment strategy. 

The report would require a description of the modification, the impact on the nuclear posture of the United States, and the implications for the flexibility and resilience of U.S. strategic forces and 

their ability to meet the nuclear deterrence objectives of the United 

States. The House amendment also expresses the sense of Congress 

concerning the importance of congressional oversight of the nuclear 

war plan of the United States. 

Comptroller General report on nuclear weapon capabilities and 

force structure requirements (sec. 1047) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1057) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 

study on the strategic nuclear weapon capabilities, force structure, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
705 

employment policy, and targeting requirements of the Department 

of Defense (DOD). The study would update the September 1991 

Government Accounting Office (GAO) report titled ‘Strategic Weapons: Nuclear Weapons Targeting Process’ (GAO/NSIAD–91–319FS). 

The study would also assess the process and rigor used by DOD to 

determine the effectiveness of nuclear-related capabilities and policies in achieving the goals of deterrence, extended deterrence, assurance, and defense, and would also include an assessment of the 

Department of Defense’s requirements for strategic nuclear bomber 

aircraft and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The provision would 

require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to 

provide the Comptroller General with full cooperation and access 

to appropriate officials and information for the purposes of conducting this study. The provision would require the Comptroller 

General to submit one or more reports on the study to the appropriate congressional committees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment clarifying that the reports required by this provision must be submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

The conferees note that, for the purposes of this study, the Department of Defense need not grant the Comptroller General access 

to sensitive operational information such as specific target locations 

or the complete target list. 

Report on feasibility of joint replacement fuze program (sec. 1048) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 216) that would limit 

the obligation and expenditure of funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2012 for the Air 

Force for the joint/common replacement fuze program for Air Force 

and Navy nuclear warheads to not more than 75 percent until the 

Secretary of Defense submits a report to the congressional defense 

committees on the feasibility of the program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force to jointly 

submit a report to the congressional defense committees, no later 

than December 31, 2012, on the feasibility of the joint replacement 

fuze program. The report would be required to include an assessment of the feasibility of including various options in the joint fuze 

and how the inclusion of such options will affect safety, security, 

reliability, and adaptability, as well as the program schedule and 

budget. 

Subtitle F—Financial Management 

Modification of authorities on certification and credential standards 

for financial management positions in the Department of Defense (sec. 1051) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1061) that would 

strengthen the authority of the Secretary of Defense to establish 

certification and credential standards for financial management positions in the Department of Defense. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
706 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1003). 

The House recedes. 

Reliability of Department of Defense financial statements (sec. 1052) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1062) that would 

change the timing of the annual representation of the Department 

of Defense as to the expected reliability of its financial statement 

to better harmonize with the timing of the Department’s financial 

statements. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Inclusion of plan on the financial management workforce in the 

strategic workforce plan of the Department of Defense (sec. 

1053) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1063) that would require an assessment of the financial management workforce of the 

Department of Defense and a plan for addressing any gaps in capabilities of that workforce. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to assess and plan the Department’s financial 

management workforce through the strategic workforce plan established pursuant to section 115b of title 10, United States Code. 

Tracking implementation of Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 

1054) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1064) that would require the Comptroller General to assess and report to Congress on 

the extent to which the Department of Defense has tracked and realized the savings proposed pursuant to the efficiencies initiatives 

announced by the Secretary of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle G—Repeal and Modification of Reporting Requirements 

Repeal of reporting requirements under title 10, United States Code 

(sec. 1061–1067) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1071) that would repeal certain recurring reporting requirements applicable to the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a subtitle (Subtitle F of Title 

X) that would repeal or modify certain recurring reporting requirements. 

The House recedes with an amendment incorporating repeals 

and modifications from both bills. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
707 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Transmission of reports in electronic format (sec. 1068) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1073) that would require that Department of Defense reports to Congress be transmitted, to the maximum extent practicable, in an electronic format. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Modifications to annual aircraft procurement plan (sec. 1069) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1074) that would 

modify section 231a of title 10, United States Code, to expand the 

coverage of the report to Army aircraft, and include additional 

types of aircraft for the armed forces in the following categories: (1) 

remotely piloted aircraft; (2) rotary-wing aircraft; and (3) operational support and executive lift aircraft. The provision would also 

require an annual report on aircraft inventory. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Change of deadline for annual report to Congress on National 

Guard and reserve component equipment (sec. 1070) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1075) that would 

delay the required submission date for the annual National Guard 

and Reserve component equipment report from February 15 until 

March 15. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Report on nuclear aspirations of non-state entities, nuclear weapons, 

and related programs in non-nuclear weapons states and countries not parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and certain foreign persons (sec. 1071) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1077) that would 

amend section 1055(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111—84) to add the Committee 

on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs of the House of Representatives to the list of committees 

that receive the report required by such section. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Implementation plan for whole-of-government vision prescribed in 

the National Security Strategy (sec. 1072) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1079) that would require the President to submit to the appropriate congressional committees, not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, an implementation plan for achieving the whole-of-government 

integration vision prescribed in the President’s National Security 

Strategy of May 2010. The House provision would also require annual updates to the implementation plan in each subsequent year. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1072) that would require the President to submit to the appropriate congressional committees, not later than 180 days after the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
708 

date of enactment of this Act, a report setting forth a plan to implement the organizational goals recommended in the President’s National Security Strategy of May 2010. The Senate provision would 

also require annual updates to the report in each subsequent year. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that clarifies that submission of the annual updates to the implementation plan would 

be required for each subsequent year in which the National Security Strategy of May 2010 remains the policy of the President. 

Reports on resolution restrictions on the commercial sale or dissemination of electro-optical imagery collected by satellites (sec. 

1073) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1077) that 

would require the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a comprehensive review of the current restrictions on the resolution of electrooptical imagery that commercial satellite imagery data providers 

are permitted to sell or disseminate. 

The provision would require the Secretary to take into consideration a series of factors in evaluating whether the current restriction on resolution to 0.5 meters should be relaxed. These factors 

would include: (1) the availability of foreign satellite systems capable of collecting at resolutions sharper than what U.S. data providers are allowed to sell; (2) the lead time involved in securing 

funding for new satellites, and designing, constructing, and launching them, to enable U.S. data providers to match or exceed the capabilities of new foreign satellites; (3) whether the current restrictions remain consistent with the President’s National Space Policy, 

which is to maintain U.S. commercial leadership; (4) the greater 

utility that higher resolution unclassified commercial satellite imagery would have for U.S. military forces, the intelligence community, cooperation with allies, scientific research, and support to domestic disaster monitoring; and (5) the national security risks, if 

any, of relaxing the current restrictions. 

The provision would require a report from the Secretary of 

Commerce to the appropriate committees of Congress by April 15, 

2012. 

The provision also would require the Director of National Intelligence and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence to provide a report assessing the benefits and risks of relaxing the current resolution restrictions on the electro-optical imagery from satellites that commercial U.S. companies may sell or disseminate, together with recommendations for alternative means to protect national security related information. This report would be required 

within 15 days of the enactment of this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would (1) eliminate the requirement that the Secretary of Commerce consider the 

utility that higher resolution imagery would bring to the armed 

forces, the production of military geospatial information, intelligence analysis, cooperation with allies, scientific research efforts, 

and domestic disaster monitoring and relief; and (2) extend the 

date required for the intelligence assessment from 15 days to 60 

days after enactment of this Act. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
709 

Report on integration of unmanned aerial systems into the national 

airspace system (sec. 1074) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1078) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report describing and assessing: (1) the rate of progress in integrating unmanned 

aircraft systems into the national airspace system; and (2) the potential for one or more pilot program or programs on such integration at certain test ranges to increase that rate of progress. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on feasibility of using unmanned aerial systems to perform 

airborne inspection of navigational aids in foreign airspace (sec. 

1075) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080A) that 

would require the Secretary of the Air Force to provide a report assessing the feasibility of using unmanned aerial systems to perform 

airborne flight inspection of ground-based navigational aids that 

support military operations in foreign airspace. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Comptroller General review of medical research and development 

relating to improved combat casualty care (sec. 1076) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080B) that 

would require the Comptroller General to conduct a review of Department of Defense programs and organizations related to, and 

resourcing of, medical research and development in support of improved combat casualty care. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Reports to Congress on the modifications of the force structure for 

the strategic nuclear weapons delivery systems of the United 

States (sec. 1077) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080c) that 

requires the President to submit a report to Congress whenever the 

President proposes a modification of the force structure of U.S. nuclear weapons delivery systems. The required report shall describe 

how the modification will maintain a range of delivery systems appropriate for the current and anticipated threats as compared with 

the current force structure of nuclear delivery systems. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Comptroller General of the United States reports on the major automated information system programs of the Department of Defense (sec. 1078) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080D) that 

would require the Comptroller General to perform an annual assessment of the major automated information system programs of 

the Department of Defense, comparable to the annual assessment 

that the Comptroller General already performs for major defense 

acquisition programs. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
710 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on Defense Department analytic capabilities regarding foreign ballistic missile threats (sec. 1079) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080G) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees on the analytic capabilities of the 

Department of Defense regarding threats from foreign ballistic missiles of all ranges. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on approval and implementation of Air Sea Battle Concept 

(sec. 1080) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080H) that 

would require a report on the Air Sea Battle Concept. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Report on costs of units of the reserve components and the active 

components of the armed forces (sec. 1080A) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1605) that 

would require the Department of Defense to conduct a cost analysis 

of units of the active and reserve components and direct the Comptroller General to evaluate this report. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act a report setting forth an analysis of the costs of a sample of 

deployable units of the active components of the armed forces and 

the costs of a sample of similar deployable units of the reserve components of the armed forces. 

In conducting this analysis the Department should consider 

issues and matters that are unique and challenging to comparisons 

between active and reserve components such as, but not limited to: 

a pro-rated share of active component borne overhead costs (e.g., 

generating force, schools, ranges, training centers, and material/ 

sustainment) required to prepare and sustain the reserve component when not mobilized and deployed; relative days spent training 

and preparing per year to personnel cost per year; cost of procurement and sustainment of non-deployable equipment excess to unit 

tables of organization and equipment; and impact of unavailable 

domestic response capabilities when respective components are deployed (e.g., what capabilities Governors lose when reserve component forces are deployed). 

Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of 

Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense (sec. 1081) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1046) that 

would provide the Department of Defense with authority, for 3 fisVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00740 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
711 

cal years, to advise foreign defense ministries and international 

peace and security institutions. The provision also would require 

the Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and would require the Comptroller General of the 

United States to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the 

program no later than December 30, 2013. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

provision to foreign ministries of defense by striking the phrase 

‘‘international peace and security organizations’’ from the provision, 

modify and expand the elements of the annual report required 

under the provision, and add the Committee on Foreign Relations 

of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 

of Representatives to the listed recipients of the annual report. 

Exemption from Freedom of Information Act for data files of the 

military flight operations quality assurance systems of the military departments (sec. 1082) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1081) that would exempt data files of the military flight operations quality assurance 

systems of the military departments from section 552 of title 5, 

United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1044(b)). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would incorporate transparency standards and a delegation limitation into the 

provision. 

Limitation on procurement and fielding of light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 1083) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082) that would 

prevent the Secretary of Defense from obligating any funds for the 

procurement or fielding of light attack armed reconnaissance aircraft until: (1) the Joint Requirements Oversight Council validates 

the requirements for the development or procurement of such aircraft to address a gap identified by specific reporting in the next 

Quadrennial Defense Review; and (2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics approves the acquisition strategy for such an aircraft. The provision also included a 

waiver of this funding prohibition that could be exercised if the 

Secretary were able to certify that expenditures on such a program 

were necessary to support the contingency operations in Afghanistan or Iraq. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require a 

report from the Secretary on: (1) any requirements for such a capability; and (2) his plans for meeting those requirements. The provision would require that the Secretary submit such a report before 

he obligates any fiscal year 2012 funds for such a purpose. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
712 

Prohibition on the use of funds for manufacturing beyond low rate 

initial production at certain prototype integration facilities (sec. 

1084) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1084) that would 

prohibit the use of funds for manufacturing beyond low rate initial 

production at a prototype integration facility. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the provision would contain a waiver 

option for the Secretary of Defense for reasons of national security 

or to rapidly acquire equipment to respond to combat emergencies. 

Use of State Partnership Program Funds for certain purposes (sec. 

1085) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1083) that would au- thorize the National Guard to use up to $3.0 million of the funds 

made available through the State Partnership Program to pay travel and per diem costs associated with the participation of U.S. and 

foreign civilian and non-defense ministry personnel in authorized 

National Guard State Partnership Program events. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1609). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would conform 

the provision to section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). 

Subtitle J—Other Matters 

Redesignation of psychological operations as military information 

support operations in title 10, United States Code, to conform 

to Department of Defense usage (sec. 1086) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1081) that 

would redesignate ‘‘psychological operations’’ as ‘‘military information support operations’’ in title 10, United States Code, to conform 

to Department of Defense nomenclature. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict in coordination with 

the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), 

to provide a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives that outlines: a comprehensive military information support operations (MISO) strategy to include the roles, missions, authorities, and capabilities of 

MISO active and reserve components; current and future force 

structure requirements, operational limitations and constraints; 

and efforts to shift required active and reserve component funding 

from overseas contingency operations to base funding to support future active and reserve force structure requirements. The conferees 

also direct the Assistant Secretary to include in the report an examination with recommendations for the potential transfer of 

proponency of the MISO reserve component from USSOCOM to the 

Department of the Army, similar to the potential transfer of 

proponency responsibilities for U.S. Army Reserve Component Civil 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
713 

Affairs forces. The conferees direct the Assistant Secretary also to 

include in the report an analysis of the relationship among all Information Operations/Strategic Communications disciplines to determine if they are sufficient or could be improved through changes 

to authorities, processes, procedures, and synchronization mechanisms. The conferees further direct the Assistant Secretary to submit the report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives within 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act. 

Termination of requirement for appointment of civilian members of 

National Security Education Board by and with the advice and 

consent of the Senate (sec. 1087) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1082) that 

would terminate the requirement for Senate confirmation of civilian members of the National Security Education Board. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress on application of moratorium on earmarks to this 

Act (sec. 1088) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1085) that 

would express the sense of the Senate that the moratorium on congressional earmarks should be fully enforced in this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment expressing the sense 

of Congress on the subject. 

Technical Amendment (sec. 1089) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1087) that 

would amend section 382 of title 10, United States Code, to conform the language to an amendment made by section 1075(b)(10) 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Cybersecurity collaboration between the Department of Defense and 

the Department of Homeland Security (sec. 1090) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1092) that 

would codify in statute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 

that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security signed in September, 2010, to promote and guide cooperation 

between the two Departments on cybersecurity. The MOU and section 1092 are intended to set the terms under which the two Departments will provide personnel, equipment, and facilities to enable collaboration in strategic planning, mutual support for capabilities development, and synchronization of operations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
714 

Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain Department 

of Defense critical infrastructure security information (sec. 

1091) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1091) that would exempt certain Department of Defense critical infrastructure information from disclosure pursuant to section 552 of title 5, United 

States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1044(a)). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would incorporate the Senate definition of critical infrastructure information 

and add transparency requirements and delegation limitations to 

the provision. 

Expansion of scope of humanitarian demining assistance program 

to include stockpiled conventional munitions assistance (sec. 

1092) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1092) that would 

modify the Department of Defense definition of ‘‘Humanitarian 

Demining Assistance’’ to include physical security, stockpile management, and explosive safety as components of assistance and 

training. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1201). 

The Senate recedes with a technical and clarifying amendment. 

Number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarter 

(sec. 1093) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1094) that would require the Secretary of the Navy to maintain: (1) a minimum of 10 

carrier air wings; and (2) for each such carrier air wing, a dedicated and fully staffed headquarters. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Display on annual budget requirements for organizational clothing 

and individual equipment (sec. 1094) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1095) that would require the Secretary of Defense to include with the budget materials 

submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United 

States Code, a budget justification display that covers all programs 

and activities associated with the procurement of organizational 

clothing and individual equipment. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

National Rocket Propulsion Strategy (sec. 1095) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1096), as stated in 

the House report accompanying H.R. 1540 (H. Rept. 112–78) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 that contains five findings concerning the reviews undertaken by the Department of Defense (DOD) of the solid rocket motor and liquid 

rocket engine propulsion industrial base, the reliance of multiple 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
715 

government agencies on this industrial base, the impact on the Department of Defense resulting from the end of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle program and termination of the Constellation program, and the increasing cost of 

DOD systems that are in part due to the uncertainty in the industrial base. The section also requires the President to submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees a national rocket propulsion 

strategy for the United States and expresses the sense of Congress 

that the sustainment of the solid rocket motor and liquid rocket engine industrial base is a national challenge that spans multiple 

government agencies and requires the Administration’s attention. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1091) that 

requires the Secretary of Defense to include with the budget submission a long-term plan for maintaining a minimal production capability to produce intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) solid 

rocket motors. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would add the 

long-range ICBM sustainment plan. 

Grants to certain regulated companies for specified energy property 

not subject to normalization rules (sec. 1096) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099A) that would 

amend section 1603(f) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment 

Tax Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5) for grants for energy property 

in lieu of tax credits. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Unmanned aerial systems and national airspace (sec. 1097) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1098) that would require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 

establish a program to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into 

the national airspace system at six test ranges. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require 

that, for any project established by the Administrator under this 

authority, the Administrator ensures that the project is operational 

not later than 180 days after the date on which the project is established. 

Modification of dates of Comptroller General of the United States 

review of executive agreement on Joint Medical Facility Demonstration Project, North Chicago and Great Lakes, Illinois 

(sec. 1098) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 722) that would reduce the frequency of reviews conducted by the Comptroller General of the United States as required by section 1701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 

111–84). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1071). 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
716 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Mitigation of national security threats along the border of the 

United States and Mexico 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1015) that would 

state it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense 

should take various actions to help other federal agencies mitigate 

security threats along the United States-Mexico border. The provision also would require the Defense Department to provide information on collaboration between the United States and Mexico to 

mitigate such threats. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on policies and practices of the Navy for naming the vessels 

of the Navy 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1024) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on the policies and practices of the Navy for naming vessels 

of the Navy. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Definition of individual detained at Guantanamo 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1031) that would define the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo.’’ 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on family member visitation of individuals detained at 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1038) that would 

prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to facilitate family 

member visits to Guantanamo detainees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Management of Department of Defense installations 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1041) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Defense to: (1) prescribe regulations necessary for the protection and administration of Department of Defense property; and (2) designate military or civilian law 

enforcement officers for the purpose of enforcing such regulations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Prohibition on United States citizenship for detainees repatriated to 

the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, and 

the Republic of the Marshall Islands 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1043) that would 

prohibit individuals who had been held in detention at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and who have been 

repatriated to the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
717 

Palau, or the Republic of the Marshall Islands, from being afforded 

rights and benefits under the Compact of Free Association. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding the efforts by the Department of Defense to keep America safe from terrorist attacks since 9/11 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1044) that would 

recognize the efforts of the Department of Defense to keep America 

safe since the attacks of September 11, 2001. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Trial of foreign terrorists 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1046) that would 

prohibit the trial of any foreign terrorist who is subject to trial by 

military commission by any court or tribunal other than a military 

commission. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Business case analysis for Department of Defense efficiencies 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1065) that would require the Comptroller General to assess the extent to which the 

Department of Defense conducted a business case analysis prior to 

recommending and implementing efficiencies initiatives. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Biennial review of required reports 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1072) that would require the Secretary of Defense to make recommendations to Congress, on a biennial basis, on reporting requirements that should 

be repealed. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on homeland defense activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1076) that would 

modify the requirement for reporting in years when no homeland 

defense assistance or activities take place. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1067). 

The House recedes. The conferees agree to include such 

changes in the subtitle of the bill regarding repeal and modification 

of reporting requirements. 

Study on the recruitment, retention, and development of cyberspace 

experts 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1076) that 

would require an independent study examining the availability of 

military and civilian personnel for Department of Defense (DOD) 

cyberspace operations, identifying any gaps in meeting personnel 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
718 

needs, and recommending available mechanisms to fill such gaps, 

including permanent and temporary positions. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that DOD conducted an internal study of its 

cyberspace workforce at congressional direction in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). 

The conferees agree that DOD’s implementation of the results of 

that study should proceed for an additional period of time before 

an independent evaluation should be conducted. 

The conferees also note that DOD is seeking approval through 

the interagency review process of a proposal for expedited hiring 

authority for cybersecurity personnel. This proposal will be evaluated in the context of the cyberspace personnel needs governmentwide, and especially in the Department of Homeland Security, and 

the hiring authorities available to address them. The conferees support initiatives to improve the expertise of government employees 

engaged in this critical area. 

Report on certain unnecessary or unwanted Department of Defense 

programs 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1078) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on unnecessary or unwanted programs. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on a Department of Defense recycling program for rare earth 

materials 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080) that would require the Secretary of Defense to prepare a report on the feasibility 

and desirability of recycling, recovering, and reprocessing rare 

earth elements, including fluorescent lighting in the Department of 

Defense facilities, batteries, and neodymium iron boron magnets 

used in weapon systems and commercial off-the-shelf items such as 

computer hard drives. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to prepare a report on the feasibility and desirability of recycling, recovering, and 

reprocessing rare earth elements, including fluorescent lighting in 

Department of Defense facilities, batteries, and neodymium iron 

boron magnets used in weapon systems and commercial off-theshelf items such as computer hard drives. 

Report on National Guard and reserve components of the armed 

forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080A) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the National Guard and reserve components of the armed forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
719 

Report on status of implementation of accepted recommendations in 

the final report of the 2010 Army Acquisition Review Panel 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080) that 

would require a report on implementation of the recommendations 

of the Army Acquisition Review Panel. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees are encouraged by recent improvements in the 

Army’s analysis, planning, and management of its equipment modernization programs. However, the recommendations provided by 

the 2010 Army Acquisition Review Panel (also known as the Decker-Wagner Report) identify several areas for continued or additional improvement of modernization planning and execution. The 

conferees therefore direct that the Secretary of the Army provide 

the congressional defense committees with a detailed update on its 

implementation of those Panel recommendations that the Secretary 

has agreed to adopt. The conferees further direct that the Secretary 

periodically provide implementation update briefings to the congressional defense committees. 

Comptroller General report on Department of Defense Science and 

Technology Programs 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080E) that 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to 

produce a report for the congressional defense committees examining redundancies, inefficiencies, and gaps in science and technology (S&T) programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

In current times of fiscal austerity, the conferees firmly believe 

that all activities within the Department of Defense (DOD) must 

be reviewed to identify potential cost-savings and increase efficiencies. In the President’s fiscal year (FY) 2012 budget request, 

over $12.0 billion would be dedicated to 6.1 through 6.3 Science 

and Technology programs. This funding level is a little more than 

2 percent of DOD’s overall budget, and hence it is vital that S&T 

investments are most efficiently made across the spectrum from 

basic exploration of knowledge to advanced technology development 

for the next generation of weapons systems. In addition, the conferees believe that there is potential within DOD’s S&T activities 

to better align, consolidate, or eliminate lower priority programs. 

The conferees note that in the report language accompanying 

S. 1235 (S. Rept. 112–26) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 directed the Comptroller General to conduct a study of the effectiveness of the Department’s various technology transition programs due no later than 1 year after the enactment of this Act. The conferees direct that the Comptroller General expand its study efforts in the area of defense S&T over the 

longer term and focus on non-basic research activities to conduct 

a holistic review of the Defense S&T enterprise, including its investment strategy, technology development and transition activities. In addition, the scope of this broader review should include 

the Department’s S&T related interactions with industry and academia. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
720 

Comptroller General report on Science, Technology, Engineering, 

and Math initiatives 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080F) that 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to 

produce a report for the congressional defense committees examining Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs within the Department of Defense. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees firmly believe that the education of America’s 

students in the STEM fields is vital to national security interests. 

In an increasingly globalized world, the United States is facing 

growing competition in technological advancement. Ensuring that 

the United States remains a leader in these areas will rest on the 

shoulders of current and future generations. Giving students the 

opportunities to excel in the STEM fields—from K–12 through postgraduate research—will guarantee our success as a world leader, 

and safeguard our national interests. 

The conferees look forward to reviewing the current study 

being conducted by the Comptroller General on government-wide 

STEM educational initiatives, planned to be published early in 

2012. The conferees strongly urge the Department of Defense to 

continue working in close collaboration with the Comptroller General to produce this report. The anticipated results of the study will 

help the conferees better understand the challenges ahead, and 

offer guidance on how to best assist the Department of Defense in 

developing and managing successful STEM educational programs, 

including the balance between K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and 

junior faculty programs. 

Report on effects of changing flag officer positions within the Air 

Force Materiel Command 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1080I) that 

would require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct an analysis 

and submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

effects of changing flag officer positions within the Air Force Materiel Command. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding deployment of the National Guard to 

the southwestern border of the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1085) that would 

state it is the sense of Congress that the deployment of National 

Guard personnel along the southwestern border of the United 

States should continue through the end of fiscal year 2011. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Rules of engagement for members of the armed forces deployed in 

designated hostile fire areas 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1087) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the rules of engagement applicable to members of the armed forces assigned to duty 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
721 

in hostile fire areas fully protect the members’ right to bear arms 

and authorize the members to fully defend themselves from hostile 

actions. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees acknowledge that rules of engagement applicable 

to members of the armed forces provide for self defense. However, 

the conferees also acknowledge that military commanders may restrict service members’ ability to carry or employ weapons to 

achieve mission success. The conferees encourage the Secretary of 

Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to ensure 

that members of the armed forces serving in hostile fire areas have 

the means to exercise self defense to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with their mission. 

Improving the transition of members of the armed forces with experience in the operation of certain motor vehicles into careers operating commercial motor vehicles in the private sector 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1088) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation to jointly conduct a study to identify the legislative and 

regulatory actions that can be taken to facilitate the obtaining of 

commercial driver’s licenses by former members of the armed forces 

who operated qualifying motor vehicles as members of the armed 

forces and to improve the transition of members of the armed 

forces into careers operating commercial motor vehicles in the private sector. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that another provision in this report requires a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of 

permitting enlisted members of the armed forces to obtain civilian 

credentialing or licensing for skills required for military occupational specialties or qualification for duty specialty codes. The conferees encourage including the feasibility of obtaining a commercial 

driver’s license as an element of this pilot program. 

Acquisition and procurement exchanges between the United States 

and India 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1090) that 

would urge exchanges between acquisition and procurement officials of the Department of Defense and of the Government of India. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Nonetheless, the conferees believe that it is important to increase the mutual understanding between the United States and 

India regarding best practices in defense acquisition and procurement and urge the Secretary of Defense to establish exchanges between defense acquisition and procurement officials of the Department of Defense and defense officials in India. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
722 

Mandatory implementation of the standing advisory panel on improving coordination among the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the United States Agency for International Development on matters of national security 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1093) that would 

amend section 1054 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417) to require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to establish jointly a standing advisory panel to advise, review, and make recommendations on ways to improve coordination among the Department of Defense, the Department of 

State, and USAID on matters relating to national security, including reviewing their respective roles and responsibilities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Inclusion of religious symbols as part of military memorials 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1097) that would 

amend chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, to authorize the 

inclusion of religious symbols as part of a military memorial established or acquired by the U.S. Government or for which the American Battle Monuments Commission cooperated in the establishment of the memorial. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report to Congress on maintenance, repair, and overhaul capability 

of Navy unmanned aerial systems 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1098A) that would 

require the Secretary of the Navy to provide a report on efforts to 

establish maintenance, repair, and overhaul capability for Navy 

unmanned aerial systems. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that unmanned aerial systems have become 

vitally important to the national security. Therefore, the conferees 

direct the Secretary of the Navy to report to the congressional defense committees, within 180 days of enactment of this Act, on the 

efforts being made to establish maintenance, repair, and overhaul 

capability for unmanned aerial systems. 

Sense of Congress regarding the killing of Osama bin Laden 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the killing of Osama bin 

Laden. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Submittal of information regarding individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099B) that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Attorney 

General and the Director of National Intelligence, to compile and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
723 

provide to appropriate committees of Congress certain materials relating to current and former detainees at the United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain 

members of the armed forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099D) that would 

express the sense of Congress that the remains of service members 

killed at Thurston Island, Antarctica should be recovered and repatriated. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Requirement that written communications from Congress be made 

public by Department of Defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099E) that would 

require the Department of Defense to make public any communication from a Member of Congress or congressional staff recommending the expenditure of funds from any program element identified in division D of this Act. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding deployment of armed forces without 

considerable deliberation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099F) that would 

express the intent of Congress to debate thoroughly the deployment 

of the United States Armed Forces. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a Korean War National Museum 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099G) expressing 

the sense of Congress on the establishment of a Korean War Museum. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Interagency Collaboration 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099H) that would 

direct the Department of Defense to collaborate with the Department of Homeland Security on equipment and technology that 

could be used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to improve 

the security of the United States borders with Mexico and Canada. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that there is a broad program of collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department of 

Homeland Security to identify equipment and technology that could 

be leveraged by the Department of Homeland Security to help fulVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00753 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
724 

fill its missions. The conferees note their strong interest in this collaboration and expect it to continue. 

Designation of ‘‘Taps’’ as National Song of Remembrance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099I) that would 

designate ‘‘Taps’’ as the National Song of Remembrance. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sense of Congress regarding United States Northern Command preparedness 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099J) that would 

state it is the sense of Congress that United States Northern Command should enhance its capabilities and preparedness to provide 

defense support of civil authorities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Closing of National Drug Intelligence Center 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099M) that would 

close the National Drug Intelligence center by striking section 9078 

of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law 

102–396). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Sunken military craft 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099N) that would 

amend section 1408(2) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Proclamation for national day of honor to celebrate members of the 

armed forces returning from Iraq, Afghanistan, and other combat areas 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099O) that would 

require the President to designate a day entitled a National Day 

of Honor to celebrate members of the armed forces who are returning from deployment in support of Iraq, Afghanistan, and other 

combat areas. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Additional budget items 

The House bill included additional budget items (secs. 1601– 

1699M). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provisions. 

The House recedes on all items except for sec. 1699F–1 which 

has been moved to title II. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
725 

Continuation as a permanent program and enhancement of activities of Task Force for Emergency Readiness pilot program of the 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1604) that 

would require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to continue the Task Force for Emergency Readiness pilot program as a permanent program of the Agency. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

Subtitle A—Personnel 

Amendments to Department of Defense personnel authorities (sec. 

1101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1101) that would 

make technical amendments to Department of Defense authorities 

in section 9902 of title 5, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Provisions relating to Department of Defense performance management system (sec. 1102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1102) that would 

make technical and clarifying amendments to the Department of 

Defense (DOD) performance management, training, and hiring authorities under section 9902 of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees commend the Department for its efforts to bring 

together management and employee representatives in a joint effort, called ‘‘New Beginnings,’’ to design a new performance management system and hiring process pursuant to section 9902. This 

joint labor-management effort appears to have paved the way for 

the successful implementation of significant improvements to the 

DOD personnel system. 

Repeal of sunset provision relating to direct hire authority at demonstration laboratories (sec. 1103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1103) that would repeal the sunset provision relating to direct hire authority at demonstration laboratories. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

905(a)). 

The Senate recedes. 

One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for federal civilian 

employees working overseas (sec. 1104) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1106) that would extend the authorization to waive limitations on federal civilian pay 

for persons working overseas. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
726 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1107). 

The House recedes. 

Waiver of certain pay limitations (sec. 1105) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1107) that would 

amend section 9903 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize 

highly qualified experts assigned in support of a contingency operation to receive similar benefits and compensation as other federal 

civilian employees serving in support of a contingency operation. 

This includes premium pay or danger pay allowances, compensatory time off, and other appropriate compensation or allowances 

authorized under chapter 59 of title 5, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Services of post-combat case coordinators (sec. 1106) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1108) that would require the head of each agency to provide for the assignment of a 

post-combat case coordinator in the case of any employee of the 

agency who suffers an injury or disability incurred, or an illness 

contracted, while in the performance of the employee’s duties, as a 

result of a war-risk hazard or during or as a result of capture, detention, or other restraint by a hostile force or individual. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Authority to wave maximum age limit for certain appointments (sec. 

1107) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1111) that would 

amend section 3307 of title 5, United States Code, to allow the Department of Defense to waive the hiring and retirement age limits 

for Federal law enforcement and fire fighter positions in certain 

circumstances. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require 

consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management. 

Sense of Congress relating to pay parity for federal employees serving at certain remote military installations (sec. 1108) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1112) that would express the sense of Congress that the Office of Personnel Management and the Department of Defense should develop procedures for 

determining locality pay for employees of the Department of Defense in circumstances unique to such employees. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Federal internship programs (sec. 1109) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1116) that would require the Office of Personnel Management to make publicly available on its website information on the availability of federal internship programs and to maintain a database of all individuals in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
727 

such programs. In addition, each agency would be required to appoint an internship coordinator, conduct exit interviews and provide an annual report assessment on the internship program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment to clarify the definitions of internship programs and to remove the database and reporting requirements. 

The conferees encourage the Office of Personnel Management 

to consider the feasibility of developing a centralized database. The 

conferees expect that agencies would, as a normal part of the internship program, conduct exit interviews and surveys to obtain 

data that would assist in improving the internship programs. 

Extension and expansion of experimental personnel program for scientific and technical personnel (sec. 1110) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1104) that 

would repeal the sunset provision for the experimental personnel 

management program established by section 1101 of the Strom 

Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 

(Public Law 105–261), increase the number of positions allocated to 

the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and expand the program to include up to 10 new positions for the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

the program until 2016, and grant 10 new positions to DOT&E. 

The conferees recognize the specialized hiring needs of agencies requiring a highly technologically competent workforce, such 

as DARPA. The conferees are concerned, however, that increasing 

the number of available billets for this specialized hiring authority 

for DARPA does not have a solid analytic basis, and does not fully 

account for the other means by which skilled personnel can be 

hired, such as Highly Qualified Expert (HQE) and Intergovernmental Personal Act (IPA) authorities. The conferees encourage 

DARPA to develop a better analytical framework for comprehensively detailing and justifying the human resource needs of the 

Agency, and the means by which those needs will be addressed. 

The conferees understand that the Department recently rescinded the delegation of authorities for civilian senior executive 

positions, including those for HQEs and IPAs, and are concerned 

about potential delays this might cause. To address those concerns, 

the conferees encourage DARPA to become a member of the working group established by the Washington Headquarters Service 

that was established to determine business procedures for HQE 

and IPA actions. 

Furthermore, the conferees direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Director of the Washington Headquarters Service, within 90 days of enactment of this 

Act, to provide the Armed Services Committees of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives with an implementation plan for the 

centralized appointment of HQE and IPA positions. Further, the 

conferees direct DARPA to provide a report to the Armed Services 

Committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
728 

hiring timelines for any HQE or IPA positions they may fill in fiscal year 2012. 

Authority of the secretaries of the military departments to employ up 

to 10 persons without pay (sec. 1111) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1101) that 

would amend section 1583 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize the secretaries of the military departments to employ without 

pay up to 10 persons of outstanding experience and ability. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Two-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, 

benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat 

zone (sec. 1112) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1106) that 

would authorize temporary discretionary authority to federal agencies to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian employees on official duty in a combat zone. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Modification of beneficiary designation authorities for death gratuity payable upon death of a United States government employee in service with the armed forces (sec. 1121) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1105) that would 

amend section 8102 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize a 

federal employee to designate anyone they choose to receive the entirety of a death gratuity if the employee dies of injuries incurred 

in connection with service with an armed force in a contingency operation. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1105). 

The House recedes. 

Authority for waiver of recovery of certain payments previously 

made under civilian employees voluntary separation incentive 

program (sec. 1122) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1109) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to waive repayment of the voluntary separation incentive pay (VSIP) for certain employees who 

accepted a reassignment with the Department of Defense during 

the period of June 1, 2004, to March 1, 2008, to support a declared 

national emergency related to terrorism or a natural disaster. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1103). 

The House recedes. 

Extension of continued health benefits (sec. 1123) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1110) that would 

amend section 8905a of title 5, United States Code, to extend for 

5 years the Department of Defense’s authority to pay the governVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00758 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
729 

ment’s share and administrative fees for Temporary Continuation 

of Coverage (TCC) health insurance premiums for former employees enrolled in TCC based on separation due to a reduction in 

force. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1102). 

The Senate recedes. 

Disclosure of senior mentors (sec. 1124) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1114) that would require the Department of Defense to publicly disclose the names of 

senior mentors on a quarterly basis. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Termination of Joint Safety Climate Assessment System (sec. 1125) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1115) that would terminate the Joint Safety Climate Assessment System of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Denial of certain pay adjustments for unacceptable performance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1104) that would 

prohibit certain salary adjustments for employees who fail to 

achieve satisfactory performance ratings. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Reports by Office of Special Counsel 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1113) that would 

modify reporting requirements for the Office of Special Counsel 

under section 1213 of title 5, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 

1201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1212) that would authorize the use of up to $425.0 million for fiscal year 2012 to support the activities of the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program (CERP) in Afghanistan. The provision would require the Secretary of Defense to provide the congressional defense committees 

quarterly reports on CERP activities and notification prior to the 

initiation of any individual CERP project with an anticipated cost 

of $5.0 million or more. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1202) which would extend the authority to support CERP activities 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
730 

in Afghanistan during fiscal year 2012 and authorize up to $400.0 

million for the Afghanistan CERP. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

$400.0 million for CERP activities in Afghanistan and make technical amendments. 

Three-year extension of temporary authority to use acquisition and 

cross-servicing agreements to lend military equipment for personnel protection and survivability (sec. 1202) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1205) that would extend for 3 years, through September 30, 2014, the temporary authority under section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 

Stat. 2412), as amended, for the Secretary of Defense to loan or 

lease certain equipment for personnel protection to the military 

forces of partner nations for use in coalition operations or in predeployment training for such operations. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1203). 

The Senate recedes. 

Extension and expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism (sec. 1203) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1201) that would increase the amount of funds available to the Secretary of Defense 

to provide assistance to foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or 

individuals supporting or facilitating military operations by U.S. 

Special Operations Forces to combat terrorism from $45.0 million 

to $50.0 million, extend the authority through 2014, and require a 

report to clarify future requirements. 

The Senate amendment included a provision (sec. 1205) that 

would extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide 

assistance to foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals 

supporting or facilitating military operations by U.S. Special Operations Forces to combat terrorism through 2017. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

authority through 2015 and require a report to clarify future requirements. 

Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to 

build the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1204) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1202) that would extend by 1 year, through September 30, 2013, the authority under 

section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163), as amended, for the Secretary of 

Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to conduct 

a program to build the capacity of foreign military forces. The provision would increase the amount authorized each fiscal year for 

these purposes to $400.0 million. The provision would also add a 

requirement to report annually on the implementation of the section 1206 authority during the previous fiscal year. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1206) that 

would limit the amount of funds available during fiscal year 2012 

for programs under the section 1206 authority to $100.0 million 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
731 

until the Secretaries of Defense and State jointly submit the report 

required by section 1237 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4642). 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would maintain 

the authorized annual funding level for the section 1206 program 

at the current level of $350.0 million. It would also include a clarifying amendment regarding the annual reporting requirement on 

the implementation of the section 1206 authority. 

The conferees note that the Department of Defense is author- ized to use up to $100.0 million under the section 1206 program to 

build the capacity of foreign military forces to participate in or support stabilization operations in which the United States Armed 

Forces are a participant, including building the capabilities of special operations forces. Separately, the conferees note that the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) special operations forces are 

making important contributions to Operation Enduring Freedom 

(OEF). The conferees support the President’s fiscal year 2012 base 

budget request of $28.7 million in the Army Operation and Maintenance account for the NATO Special Operations Headquarters 

(NSHQ) and believe that nothing in this Act precludes the Secretary of Defense from supporting the activities of the NSHQ using 

Overseas Contingency Operations funding for OEF in fiscal year 

2012. The conferees encourage the Secretary of Defense to submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a legislative proposal for fiscal year 2013 that 

would authorize necessary and recurring Department of Defense 

support for the NSHQ in future years. 

Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted 

recovery capabilities (sec. 1205) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1203) that would extend the authority of the Department of Defense to establish, develop, and maintain non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities 

through 2016. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would extend the 

authority through 2013 and modify the notification and reporting 

requirements associated with the authority. The required report 

will be submitted to the congressional defense committees as part 

of the recurring classified quarterly report required by section 8062 

of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 112–10), section 8060 of H.R. 2219 the 

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012, as passed in the 

House of Representatives, and section 8060 of H.R. 2219 the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012, as reported in the 

Senate. 

Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the 

Lord’s Resistance Army (sec. 1206) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1209) that 

would—pursuant to the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and 

Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172) authorize, for 2 fiscal years, the Department of Defense to obligate 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
732 

not more than $35.0 million in each fiscal year in operation and 

maintenance funding to provide logistical support, services and 

supplies, and intelligence support to: (1) the national military 

forces of Uganda participating in operations to mitigate or eliminate the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA); and (2) 

the national military forces of any other countries determined by 

the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of 

State, to be participating in operations to mitigate or eliminate the 

threat posed by the LRA. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would: strike intelligence support and limit the authority to the provision of 

logistical support, services, and supplies to foreign forces; modify 

the notification to Congress to 15 days prior to utilizing this authority; and strike the quarterly reporting requirement. 

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1207) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1204) that would authorize the Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, to establish a fund, to be known as the Global 

Security Contingency Fund (GSCF), to provide assistance to a foreign country to enhance the capabilities of that country’s military 

forces and other security forces. The provision would limit the 

amount of funds that could be contributed to the fund to not more 

than $300.0 million for each of the fiscal years 2012 through 2015. 

The provision would also require the Secretary of State, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, to notify Congress not less 

than 15 days before initiating a program under the GSCF. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1207) that would establish the GSCF to be used to provide assistance to a foreign country to build the capabilities of the country’s 

military and other security forces and to enhance the justice sector, 

rule of law programs, and stabilization efforts under conditions of 

conflict or instability. The provision would limit the total amount 

of funds appropriated and transferred to the Fund in any fiscal 

year to not more than $300.0 million. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

total amount that the Department of Defense may transfer into the 

GSCF in any fiscal year to $200.0 million. The provision would also 

provide authority during the period prior to when the processes for 

implementing the GSCF authority are fully operational for the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to certain security forces of 

Yemen and of countries in the Horn of Africa or participating in 

the African Union Mission in Somalia to conduct counterterrorism 

operations. The total amount of funds available for activities under 

these transitional authorities and the GSCF authority may not exceed $350.0 million during fiscal year 2012. In addition, the total 

amount of funds available under the GSCF authority for any fiscal 

year after fiscal year 2012 would be limited to $300.0 million. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
733 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 

Extension and modification of logistical support for coalition forces 

supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (sec. 1211) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1221) that 

would extend for 1 year the authority under section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 

110–181), as amended, to provide logistical support for coalition 

forces supporting operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

One-year extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Iraq 

and Afghanistan (sec. 1212) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1222) that 

would extend for 1 year, through December 31, 2012, the authority 

under section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–81; 123 Stat. 2533), as amended, 

to transfer defense articles being withdrawn from Iraq to the Iraq 

security forces or the Afghanistan security forces, and to provide 

defense services in connection with the transfer of those defense articles. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

One-year extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (sec. 1213) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1213) that would extend for 1 year the authority under section 1233 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 

181), as amended, for the Secretary of Defense to reimburse key cooperating nations for support provided to or in connection with U.S. 

military operations in Operation Enduring Freedom (‘‘Coalition 

Support Fund’’ authority). The total amount of reimbursements authorized under this section during fiscal year 2012 would be limited 

to $1.6 billion. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1226) that would extend the Coalition Support Fund authority for 

1 year and limit the total amount of reimbursements authorized for 

fiscal year 2012 to $1.75 billion. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

total amount of Coalition Support Fund reimbursements for fiscal 

year 2012 to $1.69 billion. 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or 

bases in Iraq and Afghanistan (sec. 1214) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1218) that would 

prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for permanently stationing United States Armed Forces in 

Iraq or Afghanistan. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
734 

The Senate recedes. 

Authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 1215) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1216) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to use funds available to the Department of Defense (DOD) to support the operations and activities 

of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (OSC–I), including life 

support, transportation and personal security, and facilities renovation and construction. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1228) that would authorize the use of DOD funds to support the 

operations and activities of the OSC–I and security assistance 

teams. The provision would limit the total amount of funds available for these purposes to $524.0 million. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would clarify the 

Senate provision and require a report by the Secretary of Defense, 

not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, on 

the activities of the OSC–I. 

One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1216) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1086) that would 

provide a 1-year extension of the authority under section 1216 of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383) to use up to $50.0 million to support 

a program for the reintegration of former insurgent fighters into 

Afghan society. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1224). 

The House recedes. 

Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (sec. 1217) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1211) that would 

provide a 1 year extension of the authority under section 1217 of 

the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383) for a program to develop and carry out 

infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, to be funded by the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (AIF). The provision would authorize up 

to $475.0 million for the AIF. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1225) that would provide up to $400.0 million for the AIF. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

up to $400.0 million for the AIF and make technical changes. 

Two-year extension of certain reports on Afghanistan (sec. 1218) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1223) that would extend through the end of fiscal year 2014 the requirement under 

section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385) for a report on the 

progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1227) that 

would extend through the end of fiscal year 2014 the requirement 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
735 

to provide a report under section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 

385) and the requirement under section 1231 of that Act to provide 

a report on the long-term plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces. 

The House recedes. 

Limitation on availability of amounts for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan (sec. 1219) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1219) that would 

permit no more than 75 percent of amounts available for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund for fiscal year 2012 to be used to assist the Government of Afghanistan unless the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to Congress that women in Afghanistan are an integral part of the reconciliation process between the Government of Afghanistan and the 

Taliban. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would restrict the 

availability of more than 50 percent of the funds authorized for a 

program of reintegration under another section of this title unless 

the certification under this provision is made. 

Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund 

(sec. 1220) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1214) that would extend for 1 year the authority under section 1224 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2521), as amended, regarding the use of the Pakistan 

Counterinsurgency Fund (PCF) to build the capabilities of the 

Pakistan security forces. The provision would also restrict the 

amount of PCF funds that could be obligated in a fiscal year to not 

more than 25 percent of funds appropriated or transferred to the 

PCF until a report is submitted to Congress on the strategy for utilizing the PCF and metrics for measuring progress. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1223) that 

would extend the authority regarding the use of the PCF for 1 

year. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would allow up 

to 40 percent of amounts appropriated or transferred to the PCF 

during fiscal year 2012 to be obligated prior to the submission of 

the report to Congress on a strategy and metrics for the PCF. The 

amendment would also require the report to include a strategy for 

enhancing Pakistan’s efforts to counter improvised explosive devices (IED) and information on whether Pakistan is making significant efforts to implement a strategy to counter IEDs. 

The conferees encourage the Secretary of Defense to make 

available a copy of the report required under this section to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
736 

Benchmarks to evaluate the progress being made toward the transition of security responsibilities for Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan (sec. 1221) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1229) that 

would require the President to set benchmarks for evaluating 

progress being made in Afghanistan toward transitioning and 

transferring lead responsibility for security to the Government of 

Afghanistan, and to report regularly to Congress on those benchmarks. The provision would also require the President to develop 

a transition plan for expediting the drawdown of U.S. troops and 

accelerating the transfer of authority to the Government of Afghanistan. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

President to establish and update regularly options to accelerate 

the expansion of the capacity of Afghan National Security Forces 

with the goals of enabling the Government of Afghanistan to assume lead security responsibility, achieving U.S. national security 

objectives in Afghanistan, and enabling the United States to move 

to an enduring partnership with Afghanistan. The provision would 

also require the President to establish benchmarks to evaluate 

progress toward these goals and regularly report to Congress on 

those benchmarks. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Report on Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of Pakistan for operations conducted in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (sec. 1231) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1231) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the 

congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign 

Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 

the House of Representatives assessing the effectiveness of Coalition Support Fund reimbursements to the Government of Pakistan 

for operations conducted in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Review and report on Iran’s and China’s conventional and anti-access capabilities (sec. 1232) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1221) that would require the Secretary of Defense to appoint an entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an independent review of gaps between Iran’s and China’s conventional and anti-access capabilities 

and the United States’ capability to overcome them. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would direct the 

Comptroller General of the United States to conduct the review. 

Report on energy security of NATO alliance (sec. 1233) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1222) that would require the Secretary of Defense to direct a federally funded research 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
737 

and development center (FFRDC) of the Department of Defense to 

assess the energy security of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) alliance. The provision would also require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on the results of the assessment by the FFRDC. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State 

and the Secretary of Energy, to report on the efforts by the Department of Defense, including within NATO, to address the energy security of the NATO alliance. 

Comptroller General of the United States report on the National 

Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 1234) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1242) that 

would direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a review of the effectiveness of the National Guard State Partnership Program and provide the results of the review to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives no later than March 31, 2012. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Man-portable air-defense systems originating from Libya (sec. 1235) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1243) that 

would direct the Intelligence Community to complete an intelligence assessment of the disposition of man-portable air-defense 

systems (MANPADS) in Libya. Following the completion of the intelligence assessment, the provision would require the President to 

develop a strategy to reduce and mitigate the threat posed from 

MANPADS. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (sec. 1236) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1224) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report on military and security 

developments in North Korea. The provision would require two reports: one due on March 1, 2012, and the other due on March 1, 

2013. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require a 

single report, due to specified committees of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives on November 1, 2012. 

Sense of Congress on non-strategic nuclear weapons and extended 

deterrence policy (sec. 1237) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1230) that would 

prohibit any action from being taken to effect or to implement the 

reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal of nuclear forces of the 

United States that are based in Europe. The provision included two 

exceptions to this prohibition. First, the reduction, consolidation, or 

withdrawal of such nuclear forces would be allowed if such action 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
738 

is requested by the government of the host nation. Second, an exception would be allowed if the President certifies that North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member states have considered 

the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal within the NATO High 

Level Group; that NATO has decided to support the reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal; and that the remaining nuclear forces of 

the United States that are based in Europe after such reduction, 

consolidation, or withdrawal would provide a commensurate or better level of assurance and credibility as before. The provision would 

require that upon any decision to reduce, consolidate, or withdraw 

nuclear forces of the United States from Europe, the President 

must submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification of the certification described above. The certification must 

contain a justification for the reduction and an assessment of how 

NATO member states, in light of such action, assess the credibility 

of the deterrence capability of the United States in support of its 

commitments under article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949. 

This provision would require the expiration of a 180 day wait period beginning on the date that the President makes the certification described above before the President may commence a reduction, consolidation, or withdrawal. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would express 

the sense of Congress on non-strategic nuclear weapons and extended deterrence policy. It states that if the United States pursues 

arms control negotiations with the Russian Federation, such negotiations should be aimed at the reduction of Russian deployed and 

non-deployed non-strategic nuclear weapons and increased transparency of such weapons. It also states that for the purposes of 

such negotiations, non-strategic nuclear weapons should be considered when weighing the balance of the nuclear forces of the United 

States and Russia and that geographical relocation and consolidated or centralized storage of non-strategic nuclear weapons by 

Russia should not be considered a reduction or elimination of such 

weapons. 

Regarding extended deterrence, the provision states that it is 

the sense of Congress that the commitment of the United States to 

extended deterrence in Europe and the nuclear alliance of NATO 

is an important component of ensuring and linking the national security of the United States and its European allies. Finally, it 

would express the sense of Congress that the nuclear forces of the 

United States are a key component of the NATO nuclear alliance 

and that the presence of United States nuclear weapons in Europe—combined with NATO’s unique nuclear sharing arrangements under which non-nuclear members participate in nuclear 

planning and possess specially configured aircraft capable of delivering nuclear weapons—provides reassurance to NATO allies who 

feel exposed to regional threats. 

Annual report on Military and Security Developments involving the 

People’s Republic of China (sec. 1238) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1227) that would 

further amend subsection (b) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65) 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
739 

to include additional information in the annual report to Congress 

and to change the title of the report. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would retain the 

current title of the report. 

Report on expansion of participation in Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot 

Training Program (sec. 1239) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1232) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to submit a report to Congress on the desirability 

and feasibility of expanding the participation of foreign countries in 

the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment that would 

require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of State, to submit a report on expanding the ENJJPT program. 

The conferees encourage the Secretary of Defense also to consult 

with the Secretary of the Air Force in preparing the report required under this section. 

Report on Russian nuclear forces (sec. 1240) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1235) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of 

National Intelligence, to submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees not later than March 1, 2013, on the nuclear 

forces of the Russian Federation and the New START Treaty. The 

provision would require the report to include an assessment of the 

number of nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles relative to New 

START levels by 2017 and by 2022; options with respect to the size 

and composition of Russian nuclear forces that Russia is considering; factors that are likely to influence the number and composition of Russian nuclear forces; and effects of shifts in the number 

and composition of Russian nuclear forces on strategic stability. 

The report would be required to be submitted in unclassified form, 

but may include a classified annex. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 

The conferees note that if information that addresses this requirement already exists, the Secretary need only provide the committees listed in this section with this information to fulfill the requirement of this section. 

Report on progress of the African Union in operationalizing the African Standby Force (sec. 1241) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1241) that 

would direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to provide 

a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives on progress of the African Union in 

operationalizing the African Standby Force. This report shall be 

provided no later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
740 

Defense Cooperation with Republic of Georgia (sec. 1242) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1244) that 

would require the President to develop and submit to Congress a 

plan for the normalization of U.S. defense cooperation with the Republic of Georgia, including the sale of defensive arms. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees understand normalization of U.S. defense cooperation to mean strengthening the Republic of Georgia’s capacity 

to provide for its own self-defense, including through the U.S. sale 

of defensive arms, and continuing to enhance the ability of the 

United States and the Republic of Georgia to meet common international defense objectives in partnership together, including regional security. 

Prohibition on procurements from Communist Chinese military 

companies (sec. 1243) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1234) that would 

amend section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) by adjusting the waiver 

provision and modifying the definition of Communist Chinese military company. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would only adjust 

the waiver provision. 

Sharing of classified United States ballistic missile defense information with the Russian Federation (sec. 1244) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1228) that would 

prohibit the availability of funds made available to carry out this 

Act from being used to provide sensitive ballistic missile defense 

technology or data of the United States to the Russian Federation. 

The provision would also limit the availability of funds to provide 

other ballistic missile defense technology or data of the United 

States to the Russian Federation unless the President submits a 

report and a certification, not less than 30 days in advance, to the 

appropriate congressional committees. 

The Senate amendment contained a related provision (sec. 233) 

that would state it is the sense of Congress that it is in the national security interests of the United States to pursue efforts at 

missile defense cooperation with Russia that would enhance security, including the sharing of classified United States information. 

The provision would also require a report on the status of such efforts. 

The conferees agree to a provision that would require that no 

classified United States ballistic missile defense information may 

be provided to the Russian Federation unless, 60 days prior to any 

instance in which the United States Government plans to provide 

such information to the Russian Federation, the President provides 

notification to the appropriate congressional committees. The provision would specify the elements required of each such notification. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
741 

Imposition of sanctions with respect to the financial sector of Iran 

(sec. 1245) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1245) that 

would require the imposition of sanctions with respect to the financial sector of Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would: (1) permit 

the President—in addition to prohibiting—to impose strict conditions on the maintaining of a correspondent account or payablethrough account by a foreign financial institution that has dealings 

with the Central Bank of Iran; (2) add the Secretary of State and 

the Director of National Intelligence to the report required with respect to petroleum sanctions; (3) modify the Presidential waiver to 

a national security interest waiver; and (4) provide the President 

with the authority to implement and enforce penalties associated 

with the provision. 

The conferees intend that implementation be undertaken to 

conform with the timelines established by this section. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Conditional extension and modification of authority to build the capacity of counterterrorism forces of Yemen 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1204) that 

would extend, for 1 fiscal year, the authority of the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to build the 

capacity of the Yemen Ministry of Interior counterterrorism forces 

if the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State jointly certify 

that such activities are important to the national security interests 

of the United States. The provision would also require the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State to provide a report with 

the certification that would provide the reasons the administration 

deemed the delivery of such assistance and assistance provided to 

Yemen’s national military forces under section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163) important to the national security interests of the United 

States, as well as establish a 60-day ‘‘notice and wait’’ period for 

the provision of assistance. The provision would also permit the Department to expend not more than $10.0 million per fiscal year on 

minor military construction projects outside of Sana’a—the capital 

of Yemen, and Sana’a Governorate. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees integrated this provision into the global security 

contingency fund created under a different section of this Act as a 

transitional authority. 

Interagency working group on foreign police training 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1206) that would establish an interagency working group to monitor, coordinate, and 

unify foreign police training, projects, and activities of various federal departments and agencies. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
742 

The conferees note that section 1235(c) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 

111–383) required a ‘‘report on government police training and 

equipping programs.’’ This report is due on January 7, 2012. The 

conferees look forward to reviewing this report and considering future action on this matter. 

Authority to build the capacity of certain counterterrorism forces of 

East African countries 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1208) that 

would authorize, for 2 fiscal years, the Secretary of Defense, with 

the concurrence of the Secretary of State to build the capacity of 

the national military forces, security agencies that serve a similar 

defense function, and border security forces of Djibouti, Ethiopia, 

and Kenya, and the national military forces of nations participating 

in the African Union Mission in Somalia for the purpose of conducting counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda, al Qaeda affiliates, and al Shabaab in East Africa. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees integrated this provision into the global security 

contingency fund created under a different section of this Act as a 

transitional authority. 

Report on extension of United States-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1215) that would require the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional defense 

committees if the U.S. Government and the Government of the Republic of Iraq complete an agreement to permit the United States 

to retain a force presence in Iraq above that envisioned for the Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on United States military strategy in Afghanistan in light of 

the Death of Osama Bin Laden 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1217) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the U.S. military strategy in Afghanistan, including any changes to that strategy in light of the death 

of Osama bin Laden. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

National security risk assessment of United States federal debt 

owned by the People’s Republic of China 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1225) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of 

National Intelligence, to conduct an assessment of the national security risks posed to the United States and its allies as a result of 

the debt owed to China. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
743 

The conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to provide an assessment of the national security risks posed to the United States 

as a result of the United States federal debt owed to China as a 

creditor of the United States Government and the implications of 

that debt for the United States military. The assessment shall include a description of the United States federal debt liabilities 

owed to China as a creditor of the United States and a discussion 

of any options available to China for deterring United States military freedom of action in the western Pacific as a result of this 

debt. This assessment shall be provided not later than 120 days 

after enactment of this Act, should be provided in written form to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, and may contain a classified annex if necessary. 

In preparing this assessment, the Secretary should consult with 

other members of the Executive Branch, as necessary, including 

the Director of National Intelligence. 

Congressional notification requirement before permanent relocation 

of any United States military unit stationed outside the United 

States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1226) that would require the Secretary of Defense, prior to relocating any military unit 

stationed outside the United States, to submit to Congress a written notification and detailed report relating to the planned relocation. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

International agreements relating to missile defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1229) that would establish policy and conditions related to international agreements 

relating to limitations on the missile defense capabilities of the 

United States. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Certification requirement regarding efforts by Government of Pakistan to implement a strategy to counter improvised explosive devices 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1230) that 

would provide that prior to the use of funds from the Pakistan 

Counterinsurgency Fund, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Secretary of State, should certify to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that the Government of Pakistan is demonstrating a 

continuing commitment to and making significant efforts towards 

the implementation of a strategy to counter improvised explosive 

devices (IED). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees note that the report required under another section of this title to be submitted in connection with the use of the 

Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund includes a requirement for a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
744 

strategy to enhance the efforts of Pakistan to counter IEDs and information on whether Pakistan is demonstrating a continuing commitment to and making significant efforts toward implementing a 

strategy to counter IEDs. 

Rule of construction relating to the situation in Libya 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1231) that would 

conclude that nothing in the House bill shall be construed to authorize military operations in Libya. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation 

Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1233) that would require the President to report to Congress containing an estimate of 

the long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, and Operation Odyssey Dawn. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on United States ground combat presence in Libya 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1236) that would 

prohibit the presence of ground combat troops in Libya. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Repeal of the United States Institute of Peace Act 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1237) that would repeal the United States Institute of Peace Act (title XVII of Public 

Law 98–525; 22 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds 

(sec. 1301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1301) that would define the programs and funds that are Cooperative Threat Reduction 

(CTR) programs and funds as those authorized to be appropriated 

in section 301 of this Act and specify that CTR funds shall remain 

available for obligation for 3 fiscal years. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision. 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Funding allocations (sec. 1302) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1302) that would 

provide specific amounts for each program element under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program 

from within the overall $508.2 million that the committee would 

authorize for the CTR program, require notification to Congress 15 

days before the Secretary of Defense obligates and expends fiscal 

year 2012 funds for purposes other than those specifically authorVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00774 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
745 

ized, and provide limited authority to obligate amounts for a program element under the CTR program in excess of the amount specifically authorized for that purpose. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1302). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for cooperative biological engagement program (sec. 1303) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1303) that would 

limit funds that may be obligated or expended for fiscal year 2012 

for the cooperative biological engagement program (CBEP) to not 

more than 75 percent of the amounts authorized or otherwise available, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to 

the appropriate congressional committees an analysis of the effectiveness of CBEP, a certification that CBEP results in changed 

practices and threat reduction, or a detailed list of policy and program recommendations considered by the Secretary to be necessary 

to modify, expand, or curtail CBEP. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

amount to be obligated to not more than 80 percent. 

Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence 

in countries outside of the former Soviet Union (sec. 1304) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1303) that 

would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from obligating or expending more than $0.5 million of Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) 

funds to establish a center of excellence in any country outside of 

the former Soviet Union (FSU) until such time as the Secretary of 

Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

on the particular center to be established. The report shall identify 

the country where the center would be established, the purpose for 

which the center would be used, the agreement under which the 

center would operate, and the funding plan for the center including 

any cost sharing arrangement. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Working capital funds (sec. 1401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1401) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for working capital and 

revolving funds. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1401). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
746 

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1402) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for the National Defense 

Sealift Fund. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1402). 

The Senate recedes. 

Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense (sec. 1403) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1403) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for chemical agents and 

munitions destruction, defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1404). 

The Senate recedes. 

Drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, defense-wide (sec. 

1404) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1404) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for drug interdiction and 

counterdrug activities, defense-wide. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1405). 

The Senate recedes. 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1405) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1406). 

The Senate recedes. 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1406) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for the Defense Health 

Program. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1403). 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds (sec. 1411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1411) that would authorize $50.1 million from the National Defense Stockpile Transaction fund for the operation and maintenance of the National Defense Stockpile for fiscal year 2012. This provision would also permit the use of additional funds for extraordinary or emergency conditions 45 days after congressional notification. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1411). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
747 

Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile (sec. 1412) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1412) that would 

amend section 3402(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65), as amended, to increase 

the Department of Defense stockpile commodity disposal authority 

from $730.0 million to $830.0 million, and to extend this authority 

from 2013 to 2016. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision. 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(sec. 1421) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1431) that would authorize $67.7 million to be appropriated for the operation of the 

Armed Forces Retirement Home during fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1421). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration 

Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois 

(sec. 1422) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1432) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer $135.6 million from the 

Defense Health Program to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund 

created by section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1431). 

The Senate recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Changes to management organization to the Assembled Chemical 

Weapons Alternative program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1421) that would 

amend section 1412(g)(2) of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521) to eliminate the requirement for 

the program manager for the Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternative (ACWA) program to act independently of the Army program 

manager for Chemical Demilitarization and to report to the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. The 

provision would also require the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs to provide a 

briefing on ways that lessons learned from Army Chemical Materials Agency operations could be applied to the ACWA program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
748 

The conferees agree that the Army Chemical Materials Agency 

has developed great expertise in the demilitarization of chemical 

weapons that could be highly beneficial to the ACWA program. The 

conferees expect the Department of Defense to assess and, to the 

extent practicable, implement opportunities to leverage such expertise to maximize ACWA program effectiveness, without changing 

the management structure for the ACWA program. 

Amendment of Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1422) that 

would clarify that any amendments or repeals in this Act made in 

reference to the Armed Forces Retirement Home be considered to 

be made to a section or other provision of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (title XI of Public Law). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Annual validation of multiyear accreditation 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1423) that 

would require the Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home, if accreditation is granted to the Home for more 

than 1 year, to seek validation of the accreditation for every year 

that the Department of Defense Inspector General does not conduct 

an inspection of the Home. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Mission force enhancement transfer fund 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1433) that would: (1) 

establish a fund known as the ‘‘Mission Force Enhancement Transfer Fund’’; (2) authorize $348.3 million for the Fund, consisting of 

the amount of funds not needed to carry out projects identified 

elsewhere in the bill; and (3) define the purposes for which the Secretary of Defense could make transfers from the Fund. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Purpose (sec. 1501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1501) stating the 

purpose of the title. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1501). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Procurement (sec. 1502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1502) authorizing 

additional appropriations for procurement. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1502). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
749 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1503) authorizing 

additional appropriations for research, development, test, and evaluation. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1503). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1504) authorizing 

additional appropriations for operation and maintenance. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1504). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Military personnel (sec. 1505) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1505) authorizing 

additional appropriations for military personnel. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1505). 

The Senate recedes. 

Working capital funds (sec. 1506) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1506) authorizing 

additional appropriations for Working Capital Funds. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1506). 

The Senate recedes. 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1507) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1507) authorizing 

additional appropriations for the Defense Health Program. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1507). 

The Senate recedes. 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1508) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1508) authorizing 

additional appropriations for drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, defense-wide. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1508). 

The Senate recedes. 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1509) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1509) authorizing 

additional appropriations for the Defense Inspector General. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1509). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
750 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1521) stating that 

the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

1521). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1522) that would 

provide the Department with special transfer authority totaling 

$3.0 billion in fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1522) that would provide the Department with $4.0 billion in special transfer authority. 

The House recedes. 

Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1531) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 141) that would authorize various transfer authorities and associated activities for the 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain facilities projects in Iraq (sec. 1532) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1532) that would 

apply the prohibitions of section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 

110–417) to funds authorized to be appropriated by this title. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 

1533) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1531) that would extend for fiscal year 2012 the application of the existing limitations 

on the use of the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF) under 

section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended. The 

provision would also authorize the use of amounts in the ASFF for 

literacy instruction for Afghanistan Ministry of Defense personnel. 

In addition, the provision would withhold the availability of 25 percent of the funds for the ASFF during fiscal year 2012 unless the 

Secretary of Defense certified that sufficient contract management 

and oversight mechanisms were in place. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1532) that would extend the existing limitations on the use of 

ASFF and authorize the use of ASFF amounts for literacy and voVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00780 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
751 

cational training for personnel of the Afghanistan Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to certify to Congress not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act that sufficient contract management and oversight mechanisms are in place in Afghanistan or 

report on the efforts of the Department of Defense to put those 

mechanisms in place. 

One-year extension of project authority and related requirements of 

Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1533) that would extend for 1 year the authority under section 1535 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383) for the Department of Defense Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO) in Afghanistan. The provision would authorize up to $75.0 million for the activities of the 

Task Force. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1531) that would extend the authority for the TFBSO for 1 year 

and authorize up to $150.0 million for its activities. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would authorize 

up to $150.0 million for the activities of the TFBSO. The amendment would also provide that funds remain available across fiscal 

years for Task Force activities that begin in one fiscal year but do 

not end until the following fiscal year. Additionally, the amendment would clarify the scope of projects that may be carried out by 

the TFBSO. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative (sec. 1535) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1533) that 

would prohibit the Department of Defense from obligating or expending any funds for the Trans Regional Web Initiative until the 

Secretary of Defense makes several certifications to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives related to the performance and cost effectiveness of the program. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Report on lessons learned from Department of Defense participation 

on interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (sec. 1536) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 1534) that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the lessons learned from Department of Defense participation on interagency teams for 

counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Defense to direct a federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment on the lessons learned 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
752 

from interagency teams for counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and provide the report with his assessment and comments to the congressional defense committees not later than 1 

year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 

Short title (sec. 2001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2001) that would 

designate division B of this Act as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2001). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified 

by law (sec. 2002) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2002) that would ensure that the authorizations provided in titles XXI through XXVI 

shall expire on October 1, 2014, or the date of enactment of an act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, 

whichever is later. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2002). 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Funding tables 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2003) making the amounts authorized to be appropriated available in the 

amounts specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Effective date 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2004) stating the 

date titles XXI through XXVII shall take effect. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Limitation on implementation of projects designated at various locations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2003) that would 

limit the Department’s ability to award a project authorized for 

various locations in titles XXI through XXVII. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
753 

TITLE XXI—ARMY

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2101) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Army for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2101). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

The budget request included an authorization of appropriations of $31.0 million for the Department of the Army to construct road 

and infrastructure improvements at Fort Belvoir, Virginia to support the construction of the National Museum of the United States 

Army, which would be funded with private donations. The conferees agree to authorize $25.0 million for infrastructure improvements to construct utilities for the new museum. The conferees 

have not included an authorization of appropriations for this 

project, since the Department of the Army has indicated that funds 

are available through unobligated balances as a result of bid savings for other military construction projects. 

The conferees are concerned that the project must comply with 

statutes regarding the construction of complete and usable facilities. Therefore, the conferees have included a statutory provision 

that requires the Secretary of the Army to certify to the congressional defense committees prior to an award of a contract for the 

infrastructure project that sufficient funds from private donations 

have been raised and a construction contract has been awarded for 

the ‘‘baseline’’ museum. Finally, the conferees direct the Secretary 

of the Army to establish and maintain a clear and auditable separation of accounts between appropriations and private donations to 

ensure that the military construction appropriations are used only 

for the infrastructure and utilities up to the museum building exterior. The conferees agree that amounts appropriated for military 

construction should not be used to construct the museum. 

The budget request included an authorization of appropriations 

of $24.0 million for the Department of the Army to construct a vehicle maintenance facility at Fort Bliss, Texas and a separate request for $14.6 million to construct infrastructure for the vehicle 

maintenance facility. The Senate amendment did not include the 

authorization of appropriations for these two projects. 

The Department of the Army notified the conferees that a portion of infrastructure project was required to ensure that a separate Electronics Maintenance Facility included in the budget request would not be complete and usable without the infrastructure 

project. Therefore the conferees agree to authorize $11.6 million for 

the infrastructure project. 

The conferees direct the Secretary of the Army to ensure that 

the authorization for each military construction project in the budget request will include a scope of work that will result in a comVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00783 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
754 

plete and useable facility without relying on the authorization of a 

separate project, even if that project is included in the same budget 

request. 

The conferees are also concerned that the authorization of appropriations for a military construction project for infrastructure or 

utilities is considered by the United States Corps of Engineers to 

constitute a complete and usable facility even if the infrastructure 

or utilities do not service a military facility. The conferees do not 

agree with this interpretation of military construction statutes as 

it would permit the construction of ‘infrastructure to nowhere’ and 

a waste of taxpayer funds. 

Family housing (sec. 2102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2102) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Army for fiscal year 2012. It would also authorize 

funds for facilities that support family housing, including housing 

management offices and housing maintenance and storage facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2102). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2103) that would authorize funding for fiscal year 2012 to improve existing family 

housing. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2103). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2104) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2104) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Army for fiscal year 2012. 

This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the cost 

of the fiscal year 2012 military construction and family housing 

projects authorized for the active-duty component of the Army. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2104). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 

project (sec. 2105) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2105) that would 

amend the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110– 

417) to allow for a scope increase of a Multipurpose Training Range 

at Fort Benning, Georgia. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2105). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
755 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 

project (sec. 2106) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2106) that 

would modify the authority to carry out a certain fiscal year 2010 

project. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 

projects (sec. 2107) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2106) that would 

amend the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111– 

383) to allow for a scope increases in various projects. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2107). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project 

(sec. 2108) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2107) that provided 

the Secretary of the Army authorization to carry out a military construction project to construct a water treatment facility for Fort 

Irwin, California. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2108). 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects (sec. 

2109) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2108) that would extend the authorization for certain projects. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2109). 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2110) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2109) that would extend the authorization for certain projects. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2110). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Tour normalization (sec. 2111) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2113) that 

would prevent the obligation or expenditure of funds for tour normalization until certain conditions were met. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees note that the term, ‘‘tour normalization’’, refers 

to a proposal to allow all married service members to serve accompanied tours in Korea. Within tour normalization, unmarried or 

unaccompanied (no dependents authorized) members would serve 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
756 

24 months and accompanied members would serve 36 months. 

Command sponsorship opportunities are not available to all service 

members and are controlled by U.S. Forces Korea. U.S. Forces 

Korea allocates command sponsorship based on the readiness contribution of stabilizing key leaders and critical skill positions for 

longer periods of time. Command sponsorship opportunity is contingent upon the availability of facilities and services and is currently 

capped at 4,645 positions across the peninsula, covering all services. The conferees’ intent is to restrict the increase of command 

sponsorship opportunities above 4,645. 

Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications (sec. 

2112) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2110) that would 

make certain technical amendments to correct certain project specifications. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2111). 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Reduction of Army military construction authorization (sec. 2113) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2112) that 

would reduce the Army’s military construction authorization. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Additional budget items relating to Army construction and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2111) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Army additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2201) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Navy for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2201). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

The budget request included an authorization of appropriations 

of $45.2 million for Waterfront Development, Phase 4 at Naval 

Support Activity Bahrain, which included the construction of a climate controlled warehouse, a vehicle wash rack, and a fleet recreVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00786 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
757 

ation center. The conferees note that phase 3 of the project has not 

yet been awarded. 

The conferees encourage the Department of the Navy to review 

the timing and phasing of the recapitalization of the Navy’s existing facilities to ensure that only the most critical projects in direct 

support of Naval operations in the Central Command area of responsibility are carried out in a difficult budget environment. 

The budget request included authorizations of appropriations of $77.3 million for Finegayan Water Utilities, Guam and $78.7 

million for North Ramp Utilities, Increment 2 at Anderson Air 

Base, Guam. The conferees defer the authorization of appropriations for these two projects pending receipt of information required 

by section 2207 of this Act. 

The conferees determined that the Massey Avenue Corridor 

Improvements Project had merit to support requirements at the 

Naval Station Mayport, Florida, whether or not a nuclear powered 

aircraft carrier was home ported there. 

Family housing (sec. 2202) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2202) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Navy for fiscal year 2012. It would also authorize 

funds for facilities that support family housing, including housing 

management offices and housing maintenance and storage facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2202). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2203) that would authorize funding for fiscal year 2012 to improve existing family 

housing. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2203). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2204) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Navy for fiscal year 2012. 

This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the cost 

of the fiscal year 2012 military construction and family housing 

projects authorized for the active-duty component of the Navy. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2204). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 project (sec. 

2205) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2205) extending the 

authorization for certain projects. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2205). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
758 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2206) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2206) extending the 

authorization for certain projects. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2206). 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Guam realignment (sec. 2207) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2208) preventing the obligation or expenditure of funds to execute the realignment of Marine Corps personnel from Okinawa to Guam until 

certain conditions are met. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that extends the limitation on the use of funds authorized to be appropriated in the Act 

with certain exceptions. The amendment also requires the Secretary of Defense to obtain a specific authorization for the use of 

appropriated funds in fiscal year 2012 to be used to construct or 

acquire public infrastructure on Guam. 

The conferees note that the Department of Defense has not 

overcome a number of obstacles, including lengthy environmental 

studies, legal challenges, and land use issues, thereby delaying its 

execution of planned military construction projects associated with 

the realignment that have been authorized and appropriated in 

previous acts. 

The conferees also note that while the congressional defense 

committees have been briefed on the Marine Corps’ preferred force 

lay-down on Guam, the Secretary of Defense has yet to provide 

Congress with a master plan for construction of facilities and infrastructure to support the Marine Corps’ preferred option. 

As was noted in the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (P.L. 111–383), the conferees continue 

to support a comprehensive approach in the Pacific that supports 

our strategic interests. Guam is an essential element in the framework of the United States’ theater security plan, but the continued 

lack of a comprehensive master plan and the inability of the Government of Japan to demonstrate tangible progress for the 

Futenma Replacement Facility provide additional risk in our ability to quickly move forward with the realignment. 

The conferees encourage the Secretary of Defense to promptly 

provide the committees with a master plan, as well as a cost-mitigation strategy, for the realignment of forces to Guam. 

Reduction of Navy military construction authorization (sec. 2208) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2207) that 

would reduce the Navy’s military construction authorization. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
759 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Additional budget items relating to Navy construction and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2207) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Navy additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2301) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Air Force for fiscal year 2013. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2301). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

The budget request included an authorization of appropriations 

of $128.0 million for the Department of the Air Force to construct 

a Fuel Maintenance Hangar at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam as 

part of the Guam Strike program. According to budget documents 

provided to Congress, Guam Strike could cost more than $2.9 billion though the Air Force future-year defense program only contains approximately $450.0 million for the program. 

The conferees believe that completing the Guam Strike program would be a significant investment and the Air Force should 

therefore re-assess the affordability of such an investment for a rotational presence. 

Family housing (sec. 2302) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2302) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Air Force for fiscal year 2012. It would also authorize funds for facilities that support family housing, including 

housing management offices and housing maintenance and storage 

facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2302). 

The Senate recedes. 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2303) that would authorize funding for fiscal year 2012 to improve existing family 

housing. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2303). 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
760 

The Senate recedes. 

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2304) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Air Force for fiscal year 

2012. This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the 

cost of the fiscal year 2012 military construction and family housing projects authorized for the active-duty component of the Army. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2304). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 

project (sec. 2305) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2305) that amends 

the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84) to 

allow for a scope increase of a Ground Control Tower at Hickam 

Air Force Base, Hawaii. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2305). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project (sec. 

2306) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2306) that would extend the authorization for an Air Force fiscal year 2009 military 

construction project at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. 

The Senate amendment contained an identical provision (sec. 

2306). 

The conference agreement includes the provision. 

Reduction of Air Force military construction authorization (sec. 

2307) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2307) that 

would reduce the Air Force’s military construction authorization. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Limitation on implementation of consolidation of Air and Space Operations Center of the Air Force 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2307) limiting the 

implementation of consolidation of the Air and Space Operations 

Center of the Air Force. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the Air Force announced a decision not 

to pursue a plan to consolidate Air Operations Centers in the 

United States. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
761 

Additional budget items relating to Air Force construction and land 

acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2308) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Air Force additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2401) that would authorize military construction projects for the defense agencies for 

fiscal year (FY) 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2401). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

The agreement does not contain authorization for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Headquarters Facility, in 

Brussels, Belgium. The conferees believe that this facility is more 

appropriately funded through the NATO Security Investment Program, which has available unobligated balances. 

The agreement contains authorization of a replacement elementary school at Baumholder, Germany with language that requires the Secretary of Defense to certify that Baumholder is an 

enduring location. 

The agreement contains authorization for a Medical Center Replacement Facility at Rhine Ordinance Barracks, Germany. The 

conferees support the project, but are concerned that the overall 

scope exceeds demand requirements. Therefore, the conferees request the Secretary reassess the scope of this project and submit 

the results of this assessment in the form of an amended fiscal 

year 2013 request. 

The President’s budget request included an authorization of 

appropriations for military construction of $54.6 million to fit out 

the third floor of the National Geospatial Agency’s (NGA) Technology center at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. This facility was constructed in 2010 as a result of the 2005 Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment (BRAC) Round. During review of the classification of 

work for this project, the conferees received a ruling from the Office 

of General Counsel of the Department of Defense that ‘‘that specifically authorized MILCON is the appropriate approach for this 

project.’’ As a result, the conferees are concerned that the original 

BRAC military construction project may not have complied with 

section 2801 of title 10, United States Code, which requires a military construction project to include all military construction work 

necessary to produce a complete and usable facility. Therefore conferees direct the Comptroller General of the United States to preVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00791 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
762 

pare a report for the congressional defense committees no later 

than June 30, 2012 on the following: 

1. A review of the BRAC project authorization for the NGA 

Technology center and a determination whether the Department of 

Defense carried out the full scope contained in the budget justification documents to construct a complete and usable facility; 

2. The circumstances that resulted in a portion of the completed facility not able to be used for the purpose for which it was 

constructed; 

3. An assessment of use of the facility to determine whether 

the facility category code that was proposed at the time of authorization of construction is consistent with its current and proposed 

use of the third floor; 

4. An analysis of the proposed scope of the new work for the 

fit out of the third floor to determine why specifically authorized 

military construction funds are required; 

5. An assessment whether the project was in compliance with 

federal laws regarding military construction; and 

6. Any other matters the Comptroller General determines are 

appropriate in the review of this project. 

The President’s budget request included an authorization for military construction of $860.6 million and an authorization of appropriations of $29.6 million for a High Performance Computing 

Center (HPCC–2) at Fort Meade, Maryland. The conferees strongly 

support the requirement and note the criticality of a timely completion of the center to national security. 

The budget justification documents supporting this project included estimated dates of February 2012 to complete a request for 

proposals, September 2012 to award a design build construction 

contract, December 2012 to start construction, and December 2015 

to complete construction. The conferees note that the National Security Agency (NSA) did not plan to award a design build contract 

until the last month of FY 2012. 

Given the relatively high cost of this project, the history of 

NSA’s military construction project management, and the critical 

importance of the mission, the conferees are concerned about providing the full authorization for military construction of $860.6 million that is not validated by a cost estimate informed by any degree 

of actual design of the facility. The conferees note that Congress 

provides separate appropriations to the NSA annually for military 

construction planning and design specifically to permit the Agency 

to get as much as a two year head start on the design of projects 

of critical importance to national security while reducing the risk 

to U.S. taxpayers that funds will only be used to carry out the essential military requirements identified during the design phase. 

These funds also permit the agency to be able to award a construction contract as soon as congressional authorization is received, as 

opposed to having to wait for that authorization to start design, 

which can potentially add significant time to total acquisition 

timeline. 

The Director of National Intelligence stated in an appeal to the 

conferees that ‘‘in FY 2012, the National Security Agency requested 

$29.6 million in military construction for planning and design of 

the HPCC–2 facility; the budget funded the construction costs of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
763 

$831 million in FY 2013 and FY 2014, for a total cost of $861 million.’’ 

The conferees agree that the request of appropriations totaling 

$29.6 million in FY 2012 will only be enough to pay for planning 

and design costs for the HPCC–2 and that the remaining $830.0 

million for construction will be subject to review by the Administration in future budget requests given the need to reduce defense 

spending. The conferees therefore agree to an authorization of 

$29.6 million to complete the design, initiate site preparations, and 

to order equipment that are considered long lead items for the construction of the facility. The conferees note that the NSA has already initiated a design contract using planning and design appropriations to minimize the impact of any delay in congressional authorizations in order to keep this critical project on schedule. 

The Director of National Intelligence also informed the conferees that the House and Senate Intelligence committees have authorized an amount for the HPCC–2 project in the FY 2012 Intelligence Authorization bill. The conferees note a history of actions 

by the NSA to appeal to the intelligence committees for the approval of military construction projects, most recently an upgrade 

to the electrical infrastructure of the north side of Fort Meade, at 

amounts that put the successful award of projects and timely completion of construction at risk. As such, the conferees strongly encourage the NSA to continue to work with the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives as 

the committees of jurisdiction regarding the authorization of military construction projects in order to ensure proper and legal execution of projects that are critical to the national security of the 

United States. 

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2402) that would authorize certain energy conservation projects for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2402). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The budget request included authorization of appropriations 

for $135.0 million for the Energy Conservation Investment Program (ECIP). The conferees note that the budget justification documents accompanying the budget request contained a list of projects 

by service that would be carried out with funds authorized for the 

ECIP account. The conferees determined that greater transparency 

and oversight is required to ensure that the projects proposed in 

the budget request for ECIP are actually carried out. Therefore, the 

conferees have included in the table at section 4601 of this Act, a 

list of specific ECIP project authorizations that exceed $2.0 million 

that have been added to the military construction tables by project, 

name, and location. The conferees also note that an authorization 

of appropriations of $18.0 million still remains in an unspecified account for various locations for ECIP, which is intended to be used 

for those projects less than $2.0 million that were included in the 

budget request. The conferees note that none of these projects listed in the table at section 4601 are in addition to, or a deviation 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
764 

from the list of projects included in the budget request for this activity. 

Authorization of appropriations, defense agencies (sec. 2403) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2403) that would authorize appropriations for military construction and family housing 

projects of the defense agencies for fiscal year 2012. This provision 

would also provide an overall limitation on the cost of the fiscal 

year 2012 military construction and family housing projects authorized for the active-duty component of the Army. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2403). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2411) that would authorize appropriations for military construction projects for the 

chemical demilitarization program for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2411). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Reduction of defense agencies military construction authorization 

(sec. 2421) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2412) that 

would reduce the defense agencies’ military construction authorization. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Additional budget items relating to defense agencies construction 

and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2404) authorizing 

the Secretary of Defense additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY

INVESTMENT PROGRAM

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2501) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to make contributions to the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program in an 

amount equal to the sum of the amount specifically authorized in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
765 

section 2502 of this title and the amount of recoupment due to the 

United States for construction previously financed by the United 

States. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2501). 

The House recedes. 

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2502) that would authorize the U.S. contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2502). 

The Senate recedes. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of 

Appropriations 

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2601) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2601) that would authorize military construction projects for the Army National Guard 

for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2601). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2602) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2602) that would authorize military construction projects for the Army Reserve for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2602). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Navy Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2603) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2603) that would authorize military construction projects for the Navy Reserve for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2603). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
766 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2604) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2604) that would authorize military construction projects for the Air National Guard 

for fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2604). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2605) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2605) that would authorize military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve for 

fiscal year 2012. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2605). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The authorized amounts are listed in this provision on an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in 

the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve (sec. 

2606) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2606) that would authorize appropriations for the reserve component military construction projects for fiscal year 2012. This provision would also provide 

an overall limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2012 military 

construction projects authorized for the reserve components. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2606). 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project (sec. 

2611) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2621) that would extend the authorization for an Army National Guard fiscal year 

2008 military construction project at East Fallowfield Township, 

Pennsylvania. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2607). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
767 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 projects (sec. 

2612) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2622) that would extend the authorization for certain fiscal year 2008 military construction projects. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2608). 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 and 

2009 projects (sec. 2613) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2609) that 

amends the table in section 2601(a) of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 

110–417) to allow the Secretary of the Army to construct an Army 

Reserve Center at Carlin, Nevada. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Additional budget items relating to Air Force Reserve construction 

and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2613) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Air Force additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Additional budget items relating to Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2612) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Air Force additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Additional budget items relating to Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2611) authorizing 

the Secretary of the Army additional funding. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure 

activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 

Account 1990 (sec. 2701) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2701) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for ongoing activities 

that are required to implement the decision of the 1988, 1991, 

1993, and 1995 Base Closure and Realignment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
768 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2701). 

The Senate recedes. 

Authorized Base Realignment and Closure activities funded through 

Department of Defense Base Closure account 2005 (sec. 2702) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2702) that would authorize military construction projects for fiscal year 2012 for ongoing activities that are required to implement the decisions of the 

2005 Base Closure and Realignment round. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2702). 

The Senate recedes. 

Completion of specific base closure and realignment recommendations (sec. 2703) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2704) that would authorize the Department limited authority to extend the implementation period of not more than seven decisions contained in the 

2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) round beyond 

the statutory deadline. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would direct the 

Secretary of Defense to complete all 2005 Defense BRAC actions as 

expeditiously as possible. 

Closing unnecessary defense facilities has historically been difficult because of public concern about the economic effects of closures on communities and the perceived lack of impartiality in the 

decision-making process. The Base Closure and Realignment Act of 

1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510) (BRAC) created 

an independent commission to review a list of bases for realignment and closure submitted by the Secretary of Defense. 

The Department of Defense has now undergone five BRAC 

rounds. The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure round was the 

biggest, most complex, and costliest round of BRAC to date. The 

final BRAC 2005 Commission forwarded a total of 182 closures or 

realignments to the Congress, including 177 of the 190 recommendations submitted by the Secretary of Defense and five closures or realignment recommendations from the eight installations 

it considered on its own initiative. These recommendations resulted 

in 22 major closures and 33 major realignments. 

The Secretary of Defense was required to complete all BRAC 

actions by September 15, 2011. This deadline was directed in statute in order to guide investments and to provide a degree of certainty to local communities around military bases affected by base 

closures and realignments. 

The budget request for fiscal year 2012 included a legislative 

proposal from the Department of Defense that would provide legislative relief to the statutory deadline for up to 10 BRAC recommendations. The conferees continued to monitor the recommendations that were in danger of missing the BRAC deadline 

throughout the year. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
769 

By the deadline, September 15, 2011, the Department of Defense notified the conferees that essentially all but two recommendations were completed. 

The conferees note that the 2005 BRAC Commission acknowledged in their report that the Umatilla Depot in Oregon might not 

be closed by the deadline due to chemical demilitarization treaty 

obligations. 

The successful completion of the BRAC decision to consolidate 

medical commands was dependent on actions by other congressional committees to approve a prospectus for a lease carried out 

by the General Services Administration. While the lease has been 

approved, the Department is still in the process of carrying out the 

move. 

The conferees expect that both closures will be carried out in 

accordance with the BRAC statute regarding land disposal and the 

movement of personnel. 

Special considerations related to transportation infrastructure in 

consideration and selection of military installations for closure 

or realignment (sec. 2704) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2706) that would require the secretary concerned to include transportation assessment 

of a proposed closure or realignment of civilian personnel that exceed certain thresholds. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Authorization of appropriations for Base Realignment and Closure 

activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 

account 2005 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2703) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for ongoing activities 

that are required to implement the decision of the 2005 Base Closure and Realignment. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2703). 

The House and Senate recede. 

Reduction of military construction authorization for base realignment and closure activities authorized through the Department 

of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2704) that 

would reduce the Base Closure Account 1990 military construction 

authorization. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Increased emphasis on evaluation of costs and benefits in consideration and selection of military installations for closure or realignment 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2705) that would increase the emphasis on the evaluation of costs and benefits in conVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00799 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
770 

sideration and selection of military installations for closure and realignment. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees support the ability of the Department to reduce 

force structure commensurate with the workload and mission requirements; however, the conferees are concerned with the perception that the Department of Defense may have bypassed the limitations of section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, by completing 

a reduction in force at a defense activity and then realigning the 

balance of the workforce. The conferees believe that such a contravention of section 2687 would be inappropriate. Activities that 

exceed the thresholds of section 2687 at the time of the Secretary’s 

decision to reorganize a particular activity should be specifically 

submitted in accordance with the notification process delineated in 

section 2687. 

Limitation on BRAC 133 project implementation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2707) that would 

limit the number of parking spaces at the BRAC 133 project location until the Secretary of Defense provides certain documents and 

certification. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family 

Housing Changes 

Prohibition on use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military construction and military family housing projects (sec. 

2801) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2801) prohibiting the 

use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military construction 

and military family housing. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military 

construction projects (sec. 2802) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2802(a) through (d)) 

that would increase the authority provided by section 2805 of title 

10, United States Code, and establish a $3.0 million threshold requiring specific military construction authorization. This provision 

would also amend section 2805 by extending certain temporary authorities associated with defense laboratories. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

905(c) and (d)) making certain temporary authorities associated 

with defense laboratories permanent. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
771 

Protections for suppliers of labor and materials under contracts for 

military construction projects and military family housing 

projects (sec. 2803) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2804) increasing the 

dollar threshold for purposes of determining when a performance 

bond and payment bond are required under section 3131 of subchapter III of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, (commonly 

referred to as the Miller Act). 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and 

maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United 

States (sec. 2804) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2805) extending for 

1 year the authority to use operation and maintenance funds for 

construction projects inside United States Central Command area 

of responsibility and Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa 

areas of responsibility and interest. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2802). 

The House recedes. 

General military construction transfer authority (sec. 2805) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2801) providing the secretary of a military department, or with respect to 

the defense agencies, the Secretary of Defense, the authority to 

transfer authorization of appropriations provided in fiscal year 

2012 between any such authorization of appropriations for that 

military department or defense agency for that fiscal year. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Clarification of authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance 

Revolving Fund for minor construction and alteration activities 

at Pentagon Reservation (sec. 2811) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2811) clarifying the 

authority to use Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving 

Fund monies for minor construction and alteration activities at the 

Pentagon Reservation. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

2803). 

The Senate recedes. 

Reporting requirements related to the granting of easements (sec. 

2812) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2812) that would remove the discretion of secretaries of the military departments regarding purposes for which easements for rights-of-way may be 

granted. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
772 

Limitations on use or development of property in Clear Zone Areas 

and clarification of authority to limit encroachments (sec. 2813) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would 

amend section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, by authorizing 

the Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a military department 

to enter into an agreement to protect Clear Zone Areas adjacent to 

airfields at military installations. 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2812) that 

would also amend section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, by 

clarifying authorities to limit encroachment on military installations. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would combine 

House section 2813 and Senate section 2812 into a single provision. 

Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities (sec. 

2814) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2813) that 

would modify section 2694(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, to 

enhance the ability of the Department of Defense to assist with the 

implementation of certain land management plans and to clarify 

that the purpose of wildlife studies authorized under the section includes the sustainability of military operations. 

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 312). 

The House recedes. 

Exchange of property at military installations (sec. 2815) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2811) that 

would allow for certain exchanges of real property at military installations. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Defense access road program enhancements to address transportation infrastructure in vicinity of military installations (sec. 

2816) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2814) that would expand the authority of the Department of Defense (DOD) to use 

military construction appropriations to mitigate significant transportation impacts caused as a result of an expanded defense mission. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

The conferees adopt the provision in recognition that transportation issues have been an issue in recent base realignments and 

the Department of Defense has been slow to revise the criteria for 

the Defense Access Road program. Recognition of these transportation issues does not imply that their mitigation is a DOD responsibility. The conferees note that many communities have been exceptional partners in ameliorating the impact of base realignments 

and believe that this practice should be encouraged. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
773 

Subtitle C—Energy Security 

Consolidation of definitions used in energy security chapter (sec. 

2821) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2821) that would 

consolidate various definitions used in subchapter III of chapter 

173 of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Consideration of energy security in developing energy projects on 

military installations using renewable energy sources (sec. 

2822) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2822) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a policy under which a 

military installation shall give favorable consideration for energy 

security in the design and development of renewable energy 

projects on military installations. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 345) 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop guidance for 

commanders of military installations inside the United States on 

planning measures to minimize the effects of a disruption of services by a utility that sells natural gas, water, or electric energy to 

a military installation in the United States. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment that combines 

the two provisions. 

Establishment of interim objective for the Department of Defense 

2025 renewable energy goal (sec. 2823) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2823) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish an interim goal for fiscal year 2018 for the production or procurement of facility energy 

from renewable energy sources. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 311) 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish interim 

goals for fiscal years 2015, 2018, and 2021 for the production or 

procurement of facility energy from renewable energy sources. 

The Senate recedes. 

Use of centralized purchasing agents for renewable energy certificates to reduce cost of facility energy projects using renewable 

energy sources and improve efficiencies (sec. 2824) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2824) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a policy to maximize 

savings by directing the centralized, bulk purchase of replacement 

renewable energy certificates in connection with the development of 

facility energy projects using renewable energy sources. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
774 

Identification of energy-efficient products for use in construction, repair, or renovation of Department of Defense facilities (sec. 

2825) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2825) requiring the 

Secretary of Defense to prescribe a definition of the term ‘energyefficient product’ and establish and maintain a list of products satisfying the definition. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Submission of annual Department of Defense energy management 

reports (sec. 2826) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2827) that would 

amend section 2925(a) of title 10, United States Code, to require 

the Secretary of Defense to submit the annual installation energy 

report not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year and 

would require that the annual report detail the fulfillment during 

that fiscal year of the energy performance goals for the Department 

of Defense under section 2911 of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Requirement for Department of Defense to capture and track data 

generated in metering Department facilities (sec. 2827) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2829) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that data being generated 

by installation energy meters is captured and tracked to determine 

baseline energy consumption and facilitate efforts to reduce energy 

consumption. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar amendment (sec. 

317) that would require the Secretary of Defense, to the maximum 

extent practicable, to ensure that the information generated by the 

installation energy meters be captured and tracked to determine 

baseline energy consumption and facilitate efforts to reduce energy 

consumption. 

The Senate recedes. 

Metering of Navy piers to accurately measure energy consumption 

(sec. 2828) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2830) that would require the Secretary of Defense to meter Navy piers in order that 

the energy consumption of naval vessels while in port can be accurately measured and lead to reductions in consumption. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Training policy for Department of Defense energy managers (sec. 

2829) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2826) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a training program for 

Department of Defense (DOD) energy managers designated for 

military installations. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 318) 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a policy for 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
775 

the training of designated DOD energy managers for military installations. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Report on energy-efficiency standards and prohibition on use of 

funds for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design gold 

or platinum certification (sec. 2830) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2831) requiring a report on the energy-efficiency standards utilized by the Department 

of Defense for military construction and prohibiting the use of 

funds to obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 

gold or platinum certification. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 

Certification of medical care coverage for H–2B temporary workforce 

on military construction projects on Guam (sec. 2841) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2842) that would 

prohibit the Secretary of the Navy from awarding any additional 

construction projects associated with the realignment of military 

forces on Guam until the Secretary establishes a lead system integrator for health care for the H–2B workers. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Repeal of condition on use of specific utility conveyance authority regarding Guam integrated water and wastewater treatment system (sec. 2842) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2844) that would 

modify the permissive utility conveyance authority contained in 

section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383). 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 

Land conveyance and exchange, Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, 

Alaska (sec. 2851) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2823) providing for a land conveyance and exchange at Joint Base Elmendorf 

Richardson, Alaska. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas (sec. 2852) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2821) revising the reversionary interest in certain land at Camp Joseph T. 

Robinson, Arkansas. 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
776 

Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and 

Ohana Nui areas, Hawaii (sec. 2853) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2822) clarifying section 2856(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84). 

The House bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Land exchange, Fort Bliss Texas (sec. 2854) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2851) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to exchange approximately 694 

acres of real property at Fort Bliss, Texas, for approximately 2,880 

acres of real property from the Texas General Land Office. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Land Conveyance, former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah (sec. 2855) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2852) authorizing a 

land conveyance, former Defense Depot, Ogden, Utah. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Redesignation of Industrial College of the Armed Forces as the 

Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy (sec. 2861) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2861) that would rename the Industrial College of the Armed Forces to the Dwight D. 

Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

1083). 

The House recedes. 

Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as 

Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center (sec. 2862) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2833) that 

would redesignate the Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital in Nevada as the Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center. 

The House did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Prohibition on naming Department of Defense real property after a 

Member of Congress (sec. 2863) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2863) that would 

prohibit the naming of Department of Defense real property after 

a sitting Member of Congress. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
777 

Notification of reductions in number of members of the armed forces 

assigned to permanent duty at a military installation (sec. 

2864) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2862) that would require a notification before the Secretary of Defense or secretary of 

a military department reduces the number of military service members at an installation by more than 1,000. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under jurisdiction of Department of the Navy (sec. 2865) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2831) that 

would require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a plan to address the facility and infrastructure requirements at each public 

shipyard under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. 

The House did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. 

Report on the homeowners assistance program (sec. 2867) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2864) requiring a report on the homeowners assistance program. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Data servers and centers (sec. 2866) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2832) that 

would impose a moratorium within the Department of Defense 

(DOD) on the acquisition or upgrade of data servers, server farms, 

and data centers, with a waiver process for exceptions; and require 

the implementation of a plan developed by the DOD Chief Information Officer (CIO) to achieve (1) a reduction in the size of data centers, (2) a reduction in the energy consumed to power and cool 

servers and data centers, (3) an increase in server virtualization, 

(4) an increase in the utilization rates of servers and data center 

capacity, (5) a reduction in the cost of software and applications 

running on servers and within data centers, and (6) a reduction in 

the cost of labor associated with operating servers and data centers. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment that would limit the 

near-term moratorium to server farms and data centers, and 

change the authority to coordinate exceptions for national intelligence components within the Department of Defense on behalf of 

the Director of National Intelligence to the Intelligence Community 

CIO rather than the CIO of the Office of the Director of National 

Intelligence. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
778 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Condition on rental of family housing in foreign countries for general and flag officers 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2803) that would 

limit general and flag officer housing leases in foreign countries to 

the design criteria for similar housing in the United States. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Continuous commissioning of Department of Defense facilities to resolve operating problems, improve comfort, optimize energy use, 

and identify retrofits 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2828) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to require the continuous commissioning of Department of Defense (DOD) facilities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees note that the DOD is currently required to recommission and retrocommision its facilities. When commissioning 

facilities, the conferees want to ensure that, where appropriate, the 

DOD considers the most current technologies, subject to fiscal constraints, as opposed to retrocommissioning the facility back to 

when it was originally constructed. 

Use of operation and maintenance funding to support community 

adjustments related to realignment of military installations and 

relocation of military personnel on Guam 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2841) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to assist the Government of Guam 

in meeting the costs of providing increase municipal services and 

facilities associated with the realignment of military forces to 

Guam. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Certification of military readiness need for firing range on Guam as 

condition on establishment of range 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2843) that would 

prohibit the establishment of a firing range on Guam until the Secretary of Defense certifies that the firing range is required to meet 

a national security need. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Transfer of the Air Force Memorial to the Department of the Air 

Force 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2865) transferring 

the Air Force Memorial to the Department of the Air Force. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The House recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
779 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY

PROGRAMS

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Overview 

Title XXXI authorizes appropriations for atomic energy defense 

activities of the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2012, including: the purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 

equipment; research and development; nuclear weapons activities; 

nuclear nonproliferation activities; naval nuclear propulsion; environmental cleanup; operating expenses; and other expenses necessary to carry out the purposes of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95–91). This title authorizes appropriations in five categories: (1) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); (2) defense environmental cleanup; (3) other defense 

activities; (4) defense nuclear waste disposal; and (5) energy security and assurance. 

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would authorize $11.8 billion for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an increase of $20.0 million above the budget request. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

3101) that would authorize $11.6 billion for the NNSA, a decrease 

of $216.8 million below the budget request. 

The conferees agree to include a provision that would authorize 

$11.1 billion, a decrease of $713.0 million below the budget request. 

Within NNSA, the provision would authorize $7.3 billion for 

weapons activities, a decrease of $355.0 million below the budget 

request; $2.3 billion for defense nuclear nonproliferation, a decrease of $216.0 million below the budget request; $1.1 billion for 

naval reactors, a decrease of $74.0 million below the budget request; and $383.0 million for the Office of the Administrator, a decrease of $67.0 million below the budget request. 

Within weapons activities, for directed stockpile work the provision would authorize $1.9 billion, a decrease of $84.0 million 

below the budget request. For campaigns, the provision would authorize $1.7 billion, a decrease of $95.0 million below the budget request. For readiness in the technical base and facilities, the provision would authorize $2.0 billion, a decrease of $317.0 million 

below the budget request. 

Within defense nuclear nonproliferation, for nonproliferation 

and verification research and development the provision would authorize $356.0 million, a decrease of $61.0 million below the budget 

request. For nonproliferation and international security, the provision would authorize $155.0 million, a decrease of $7.0 million 

below the budget request. For international nuclear materials protection and cooperation, the provision would authorize $572.0 million, the amount of the budget request. For fissile materials disposition, the provision would authorize $685.0 million, a decrease 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
780 

of $205.0 million below the budget request. For the Global Threat 

Reduction Initiative, the provision would authorize $500.0 million, 

a decrease of $8.0 million below the budget request. 

The conferees note that the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and House of Representatives fully authorized the 

President’s request for Weapons Activities in his budget request for 

fiscal year 2012 and provided robust support for his nonproliferation program. The final authorized amounts reflect the amount provided for these activities by the conference report for H.R. 2354 of 

the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and 

the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, and Related 

Agencies of the House of Representatives. 

The conferees recognize the importance of the NNSA mission 

for national security, and note the President’s commitment to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials within 4 years, and his commitment to modernizing the nuclear deterrent as reflected in the 

section 1251 modernization plan (Public Law 111–84). 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 defense environmental 

cleanup activities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

3102). 

The Senate recedes. 

Other defense activities (sec. 3103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 other defense activities. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

3103). 

The Senate recedes. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions and Limitations 

Limitation on availability of funds for Center of Excellence on Nuclear Security (sec. 3111) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3112) that would 

limit funds that may be obligated or expended by the Secretary of 

Energy for fiscal year 2012 to not more than $7.0 million for a Center of Excellence on Nuclear Security in the People’s Republic of 

China until the date on which the Secretary of Energy submits two 

reports to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives. These two reports would provide additional insight and analysis into the two stated rationales for the Center of 

Excellence. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

3114) that would recommend a provision that would prohibit the 

Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration 

(NNSA) from obligating or expending more than $0.5 million of DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00810 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
781 

fense Nuclear Nonproliferation program funds to establish a center 

of excellence in any country outside of the former Soviet Union 

(FSU) until such time as the Administrator of the NNSA submits 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the particular 

center to be established. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would hold 25 

percent of funds appropriated for any center of excellence outside 

the Former Soviet Union until the Secretary of Energy meets reporting requirements set forth in the provision. The report will provide information on any center of excellence established in a country that is not a state of the former Soviet Union and include the 

following: an identification of the country in which the center will 

be located; a description of the center’s purpose, including the country’s existing capacity to develop and implement best practices 

training for nuclear security; the extent to which the training and 

relationship building activities planned for the center could contribute to improving the country’s historical pattern with respect to 

the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and missiles; the 

agreement under which the center would operate; and, a funding 

plan for center, including the amount of funds to be provided by 

the government of the country in which the center will be located 

and the percentage of total cost establishing and operating the center the funds, provided by the government of the country, will 

cover. No funds obligated by the Secretary may be used to construct permanent or temporary buildings. 

Aircraft Procurement (sec. 3112) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3113) that 

would authorize the Secretary of Energy to use weapons activities 

funds available in any fiscal year prior to fiscal year 2013 to purchase not more than one aircraft. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with a technical amendment. 

Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms (sec. 3113) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3114) that would 

amend section 4442 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2622) by striking the portion of section (b)(2) which states ‘‘consistent with the policy direction established by the Department, all 

aspects of the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington’’ and 

inserts in its place ‘‘all aspects of the River Protection Project, 

Richland, Washington, including Hanford Tank Farm operations 

and the Waste Treatment Plant’’. The provision also amends subsection (d) of section 4442 to require notification to the Committee 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

of any changes in the roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships of the Office of River Protection. The provision also reauthorizes the functions of the Office, terminating in 2019, with a clause 

that the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management may extend the functions of the Office further if the Assistant 

Secretary determines in writing that its termination would disrupt 

effective management of the Hanford Tank Farm Operation. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with a technical amendment. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
782 

Recognition of National Atomic Testing Museum (sec. 3114) 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3115) that 

would amend section 7142 of title 42, United States Code, to recognize the National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, Nevada 

by stating that (1) it is recognized as the Official Atomic Testing 

Museum, (2) that it shall be known as the ‘‘National Atomic Testing Museum’’, and (3) ‘‘have the sole right throughout the U.S. and 

its possessions to have and use the name ‘National Atomic Testing 

Museum’ ’’. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes with an amendment striking ‘‘have the sole 

right throughout the U.S. and its possessions to have and use the 

name ‘National Atomic Testing Museum’ ’’. 

Subtitle C—Reports 

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3121) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3121) that would repeal several recurring reports from the Secretary of Energy and the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security; section 3132 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107– 

107), which requires an annual report to Congress on the financial 

and programmatic activities of the Nuclear Cities Initiative Program (a program that ended in 2006). The provision would modify 

section 4302(a)(6) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2562) repealing a requirement for the Secretary of Energy to report 

to Congress each time funds for the Initiatives for Proliferation 

Prevention Program are used to pay a tax or customs duty levied 

by the Government of the Russian Federation, this program ended 

in 2006 and no payments have been made since 2000. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Progress on nuclear nonproliferation (sec. 3122) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3122) that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit, annually until 2016, a report on the strategic plans of the Department of Energy and the 

National Nuclear Security Administration to prevent nuclear and 

radiological proliferation and an estimate of budget requirements 

over 10 years, including interagency coordination. This section 

would also require the Secretary of Energy to submit annually 

until 2016, an assessment of the risk that non-nuclear weapon 

countries may acquire nuclear enrichment or reprocessing technology, and a classified list of the location and vulnerability of 

highly-enriched uranium worldwide. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would change the 

budget requirements from 10 to 5 years. 

Reports on role of nuclear security complex sites and potential efficiencies (sec. 3123) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3123) that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit to the appropriate committees, no later than February 1, 2012, a report assessing the role of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
783 

the nuclear security complex sites in supporting efforts for a safe, 

secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent as well as carrying out nuclear weapons reduction and supporting nuclear nonproliferation 

efforts. The report would include an assessment of opportunities for 

efficiencies and cost savings and a long-term plan for the nuclear 

security complex. Finally, the Comptroller General of the United 

States would be required to submit to the appropriate congressional committees, no later than 180 days after submission of the 

Secretary of Energy’s report, an assessment of the Secretary’s report. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would change the 

due date of the report to March 1, 2013, and limit the reporting 

to the congressional defense committees. The conference agreement 

would also require the report to include, if the Administrator 

deems it appropriate, an analysis of the potential for shared use or 

development of high-explosives research and development capacity, 

supercomputing platforms and infrastructure maintained for Work 

for Others programs. If this analysis is not provided in the report, 

the conferees expect the Administrator to provide a written explanation detailing why these elements were not included. 

Net assessment of high-performance computing capabilities of foreign countries (sec. 3124) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3124) that would require the Administrator for Nuclear Security, in coordination with 

the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the 

Under Secretary of Energy for Science, and the Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security, to conduct a net assessment 

of high-performance computing capability possessed by foreign 

countries. The assessment would be required to cover a variety of 

matters associated with high performance computing. The section 

would require the Administrator to coordinate the assessment with 

other appropriate executive agencies and, upon request by the Administrator, require the Secretary of Defense to provide net assessment expertise through the Department of Defense Office of Net 

Assessment. The Administrator would be required to submit an unclassified report on the results of the assessment, with a classified 

annex if appropriate, to the appropriate congressional committees 

within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

net assessment to be conducted by the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the 

Secretary of Commerce. 

The conferees encourage the Director of National Intelligence 

to work with the Secretary of Defense to leverage net assessment 

expertise resident in the Department of Defense Office of Net Assessment and the Administrator for Nuclear Security to leverage 

high performance computing expertise resident in the national security laboratories of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
784 

Review and analysis of nuclear waste reprocessing and nuclear reactor technology (sec. 3125) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3125) that would require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to enter into an 

agreement with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to conduct 

a study on waste reprocessing and Generation IV reactor technologies. The study would include a review of previous studies on 

waste reprocessing and a determination on the feasibility of using 

nuclear reactor technology, including Generation IV reactor technology developed at certain sites, to reprocess and reuse nuclear 

materials in a proliferation-resistant manner while generating electricity. The report would also determine the waste streams from 

such reactors and analyze the proliferation risks of these waste 

streams, including their effects on nuclear nonproliferation efforts 

of the United States. In addition, the study would compare using 

Generation IV reactors for reprocessing with nuclear waste reprocessing technologies used in other countries and with direct waste 

disposal. Finally, the study would conduct a detailed analysis of 

large-scale deployment of such reactor technology at military installations. The Administrator would be required to submit the report transmitted from the NAS no later than 18 months after the 

date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would require the 

Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Secretary of Defense (as needed), to conduct 

a study on nuclear waste processing and Generation IV reactor 

technology. The study would include a review of prior studies conducted by the Department of Energy and the NAS related to nuclear waste reprocessing and the use of mixed oxide fuel in reactors, including Generation IV reactors. The study would determine 

the waste streams from reprocessing and the use of mixed oxide 

fuel, analyze the nuclear nonproliferation risks of reprocessing and 

using mixed oxide fuel, and compare the costs and proliferation 

risks of nuclear waste reprocessing technologies used in other countries with direct disposal. The provision would also require the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, to 

analyze the feasibility of deploying Generation IV reactors or other 

nuclear reactors using mixed oxide fuel at military installations. 

The report would be due 180 days after date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sense of Congress on the use of savings from excess amounts for certain pension plan contributions (sec. 3131) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3113) that as stated 

in the House report accompanying H.R. 1540 (H. Rept. 112–78) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 would 

‘‘require the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Assistant 

Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management to make determinations throughout each fiscal year, until the end of fiscal year 

2016, regarding the level of funds needed to meet the minimum 

funding standard required by the Employee Retirement Income SeVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 Dec 19, 2011 Jkt 071516 PO 00000 Frm 00814 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR329Q1.XXX HR329Q1

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
785 

curity Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–406) for any defined-benefit pension plan operated by management and operating contractors of either the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management or National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). If economic conditions improve, or efficiencies are identified, such that 

the amounts originally budgeted for contributions to the contractors’ pension plans exceed the minimum required by statute, this 

section would require the Administrator and the Assistant Secretary to promptly obligate or expend the excess funds on high priority budgetary shortfalls, as identified by the Administrator or the 

Assistant Secretary, respectively. This section would authorize the 

Administrator and the Assistant Secretary to transfer any such 

funds as needed to fulfill this purpose, and would require the Administrator and the Assistant Secretary to promptly notify the congressional defense committees if such excess funds are identified or 

transferred. The authorities authorized by this section would terminate on September 30, 2016.’’ 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes with an amendment that would express a 

sense of Congress that employee pension plans maintained by contractors who operate and manage the NNSA and the Office of Environmental Management laboratories, plants, and other facilities, 

should be fully funded consistent with law to ensure retention of 

high quality personnel. The sense of Congress would also state that 

if economic conditions improve, or efficiencies are identified, any 

funds appropriated for these pensions that are in excess to the contributions required by law should be re-directed and promptly obligated or expended on high-priority mission activities of the NNSA 

or the Office of Environmental Management. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Energy security and assurance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3104) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 Energy Security and Assurance activities. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Consolidated reporting requirements relating to nuclear stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3111) that would 

consolidate several existing reporting requirements in the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act, chapter 42 of title 50, United States Code. 

Specifically, this provision would repeal reporting requirements in 

sections 4202, 4203, 4203A, 4204, and 4208 of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act and consolidate them into a new section 4203. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees encourage the Administrator for Nuclear Security to re-submit the legislative proposal for this consolidation to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives for consideration in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
786 

Additional budget item relating to Global Threat Reduction Initiative 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3115) that would increase the authorized level for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative by $20.0 million offset by an equal reduction from the Aerostat 

Joint Project Office set forth in table 4201. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees do not support the increase in funding because 

the funding source crosses jurisdictional accounts. The conferees 

continue to support the Global Threat Reduction Initiative as an 

important priority for national security. 

Review of security vulnerabilities of national laboratory computers 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3111) that 

would amend section 2659 of title 50, United States Code, to delete 

the requirement for an annual independent external red team to 

review the security and vulnerabilities of the computers at the national laboratories and for the Secretary of Energy to submit an annual report setting forth the results of the red team review. The 

provision would direct the Secretary of Energy to conduct an annual review of security vulnerabilities of the national laboratory 

computers. The Secretary would submit a report to the congressional defense committees only if and when a significant vulnerability was discovered. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Review by Secretary of Energy and Secretary of Defense of Comptroller General assessment of budget requests with respect to the 

modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3112) that 

would amend section 3255 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2455(a)) to direct the Secretary of Energy, 

in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to review the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report required by this section. Within 30 days of receiving the GAO report, the Secretary of 

Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, would complete the review of the GAO report and submit the results to the 

congressional defense committees. This report would include the results of the review of the GAO report and the views of the two Secretaries with respect to the findings in the GAO report. In addition, 

the two Secretaries would report on whether the actual funding 

level in the fiscal year in which the report is submitted is sufficient 

for the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security 

complex and the refurbishment of the nuclear weapons stockpile. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
787 

Report on feasibility of federalizing the security protective forces 

contract guard workforce at certain Department of Energy facilities 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3121) that 

would direct the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for Nuclear Security to report on the feasibility of federalizing some or all 

of the security protective forces contract guard workforce at Department of Energy (DOE) atomic energy facilities. The provision 

would also direct the Secretary and the Administrator to submit a 

draft of the report to the Comptroller General. The final report, together with the comments of the Comptroller General, would be 

submitted to the congressional defense committees not later than 

1 year from the date of enactment of this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Comptroller General study on oversight of Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3122) that 

would direct the Comptroller General to conduct a study of the 

value of and the need for external regulation or external oversight 

of the safety of nuclear operations and the design and construction 

of defense nuclear facilities at the Department of Energy (DOE) to 

protect public health and safety. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Plan to complete the Global Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention 

program in the Russian Federation 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3123) that 

recommends a provision that would direct the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security at the Department of Energy to submit a plan 

with the fiscal year 2013 budget request to complete the Global Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention program in the Russian Federation by the end of calendar year 2013. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees request the Administrator to submit a plan for 

the program over the next 5 years with the President’s fiscal year 

2013 budget submission to Congress. 

TITLE XXXII—WAR RELATED NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZATIONS

Authorization (sec. 3201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3201) that would authorize the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board at the fiscal 

year 2012 budget request of $29,130,000. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

3201) that would authorize the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 

Board at $33,317,000. 

The Senate recedes to the House authorization level. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
788 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Additional funding for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3202) that would increase the fiscal year 2012 authorization level for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board by $2,500,000, with an offsetting reduction from the Joint Tactical Radio System Maritime-Fixed Radios program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The House recedes. 

Authority of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board to review 

the facility design and construction of Construction Project 10– 

D–904 of the National Nuclear Security Administration 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3202) that 

would amend section 2286g(1)(A) of title 42, United States Code, to 

provide authority to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board to 

review the facility design of, and review and monitor the construction of, construction project 10–D–904 of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

The conferees direct the Director of Naval Reactors to provide 

the congressional defense committees Critical Decision 1 (CD–1) 

and Critical Decision 2 (CD–2) documentation for this construction 

project, in accordance with Department of Energy (DOE) Order 

413.3 or equivalent, when completed, as well as documentation 

that applicable DOE safety requirements are met. 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Authorization of appropriation (sec. 3401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3401) that would authorize $14.909 million for fiscal year 2012 for operation and maintenance of the Naval Petroleum Reserves. 

The Senate amendment did not contain a similar provision. 

The conference agreement includes this provision. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the 

merchant marine for fiscal year 2012 (sec. 3501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3501) that would authorize appropriations for the Maritime Administration (MARAD) 

of the Department of Transportation for those activities of the Maritime Administration associated with maintaining national defense 

sealift. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
789 

Use of National Defense Reserve Fleet and Ready Reserve Force vessels (sec. 3502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3502) that allows the 

use of National Defense Reserve Fleet vessels for civil contingency 

operations when requested by another agency of the government 

with concurrence of the Secretary of Defense (or a designee). 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Recruitment authority (sec. 3503) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3503) that authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to expend available funds for 

the United States Merchant Marine Academy operating expenses 

for recruiting activities in order to obtain recruits for the Academy 

and cadet applications. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

Ship scrapping reporting requirement (sec. 3504) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3504) that would 

modify existing MARAD to eliminate the production of annual ship 

disposal reports to Congress and instead require MARAD, upon request, to provide Congress with timely briefings on its recycling 

program. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Strategic Port Assessment and Report 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3505) that would require an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of all ports designated by the Department of Defense as strategic ports. 

The Senate amendment contained no similar amendment. 

The House recedes. 

The conferees acknowledge that Congress in the statement of 

managers accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) mandated that the Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC) conduct a study on the optimal use, and potential expansion, of the 

Nation’s strategic ports. Because of the continuing importance of 

strategic ports to the national security, the conferees direct the 

Commander of the SDDC, in consultation with the Administrator 

of the Maritime Administration, to provide an updated report of 

the port facilities used for military purposes. Specifically, the report should include: an assessment of the structural integrity and 

deficiencies of the port facilities and infrastructure improvements 

needed directly and indirectly to meet national security and readiness requirements; an assessment of the impact on operational 

readiness if the improvements are not undertaken; an identification of potential funding sources for the needed improvements from 

existing authorities; and an opinion of whether the Department of 

Defense has the necessary authority to support section 50302 of 

title 46, United States Code. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
790 

Maritime Administration 

The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 3301) that 

would re-authorize certain aspects of the Maritime Administration. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The Senate recedes. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Authorization of amounts in funding tables (sec. 4001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 4001) that would 

provide for the authorization of projects, programs, or activities in 

accordance with the tables in division D. 

The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 

4001). 

The Senate recedes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
791 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT .......................................................................... 14,572 14,572 14,572 14,572 003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ................................................ 18 539,574 15,674 18 –18 –539,574 0 

Early to Need ............................................................................... [–14 ] [–417,900 ] [–14 ] [–433,574 ] Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–4 ] [–106,000 ] [–4 ] [–106,000 ] Terminate EMARRS ...................................................................... [–539,574 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 36 658,798 36 658,798 36 –36 –658,798 0 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–658,798 ] [–36 ] [–550,798 ] Unjustified production ramp ....................................................... [–108,000 ] 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) .................................................................................... 1,272 70,762 1,272 70,762 1,272 58,862 1,272 70,762 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–11,900 ] 

ROTARY 

007 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ....................................................... 39 250,415 39 250,415 39 250,415 39 250,415 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ...................................................... 19 411,005 19 411,005 19 234,005 –42,500 19 368,505 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–177,000 ] [–42,500 ] 

010 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 192,764 192,764 192,764 192,764 011 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 104,263 104,263 104,263 104,263 012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) .................................................. 71 1,325,666 71 1,325,666 71 1,317,666 –8,000 71 1,317,666 

Unjustified program management growth .................................. [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] 

013 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 199,781 199,781 199,781 199,781 014 CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................. 47 1,305,360 47 1,305,360 47 1,239,360 –66,000 47 1,239,360 

Army requested transfer to APA Line 15 for correct execution .. [–66,000 ] [–66,000 ] 

015 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 54,956 54,956 120,956 66,000 120,956 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
792 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Army requested transfer from APA Line 14 for correct execution. [66,000 ] [66,000 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

019 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS .......................................................................... 136,183 136,183 –136,183 0 

Administration recommendation ................................................. [–29,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–107,183 ] [–136,183 ] 

021 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ....................................................................... 27,575 27,575 27,575 27,575 022 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ....................................................... 8,362 8,362 8,362 8,362 023 AH–64 MODS ........................................................................................ 331,230 331,230 331,230 331,230 

024 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ............................................ 79,712 79,712 57,012 –22,700 57,012 

Cargo and ballistic protection contract delays .......................... [–22,700 ] [–22,700 ] 

025 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .......................................................... 22,107 22,107 12,107 –10,000 12,107 

Contract delays ........................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

027 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS .................................................................. 80,745 90,745 74,745 –6,000 74,745

Contract delays ........................................................................... [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] Modifications to Aircraft ............................................................. [10,000 ] 

028 KIOWA WARRIOR ................................................................................... 162,052 162,052 162,052 –69,500 92,552 

Cockpit and Sensor Upgrade Program ahead of need ............... [–69,500 ] 

030 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN .............................................................. 138,832 138,832 136,432 –2,400 136,432 

Aviation Data Exploitation Capability ahead of need ................ [–2,400 ] [–2,400 ] 

031 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ................................................................ 132,855 132,855 117,855 –15,000 117,855 

JTRS Integration ahead of need .................................................. [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

032 GATM ROLLUP ....................................................................................... 105,519 105,519 105,519 105,519 

033 RQ–7 UAV MODS .................................................................................. 126,239 126,239 76,239 –50,000 76,239 

Administration recommendation ................................................. [–50,000 ] [–50,000 ] 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

035 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................. 35,993 35,993 35,993 35,993 037 CMWS .................................................................................................... 162,811 162,811 104,251 –58,560 104,251 

Production and installation contract delays ............................... [–58,560 ] [–58,560 ] 

OTHER SUPPORT 

038 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 4,840 4,840 4,840 4,840 039 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 176,212 176,212 95,417 –61,695 114,517 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–19,100 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
793 

Aviation Light Utility Mobile Maintenance (ALUMMC) no longer 

required.

[–3,287 ] [–3,287 ] 

Aviation Sets, Kits, Outfits, Tools contract delay ....................... [–58,408 ] [–58,408 ] 

040 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .......................................................... 82,883 82,883 62,746 –20,137 62,746 

Air Soldier System early to need ................................................. [–20,137 ] [–20,137 ] 

041 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .......................................................................... 114,844 114,844 102,444 114,844 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–12,400 ] 

042 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ......................................................................... 1,593 1,593 1,593 1,593 043 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET ..................................................................... 464 2,878 464 2,878 464 2,878 464 2,878 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 1,966 7,061,381 1,948 6,547,481 1,966 5,251,934 –54 –1,701,047 1,912 5,360,334 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

001 PATRIOT SYSTEM SUMMARY ................................................................. 88 662,231 88 662,231 88 662,231 88 662,231 002 MSE MISSILE/PAC–3 ............................................................................. 74,953 74,953 74,953 74,953 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

004 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

005 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY ................................................. 710 160,767 710 160,767 710 140,767 710 160,767 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–20,000 ] 

006 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................................................... 802 61,676 802 61,676 802 58,676 –3,000 802 58,676 

Unit cost efficiencies .................................................................. [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

007 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 19,886 19,886 19,886 19,886 009 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 2,784 314,167 2,784 314,167 2,784 164,167 2,784 314,167 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–150,000 ] 

010 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......................... 2,370 18,175 2,370 18,175 2,370 18,175 2,370 18,175 011 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS ........................ 31,674 31,674 20,674 31,674 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–11,000 ] 

MODIFICATIONS 

012 PATRIOT MODS ...................................................................................... 66,925 66,925 66,925 66,925 

013 STINGER MODS ..................................................................................... 14,495 –5 –14,495 0 

Procurement early to need .......................................................... [–4,495 ] 

Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 23801A ............. [–14,495 ] [–14,500 ] [–10,000 ] 

014 ITAS/TOW MODS .................................................................................... 13,577 13,577 13,577 13,577 

015 MLRS MODS .......................................................................................... 8,236 8,236 8,236 8,236 016 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 11,670 11,670 11,670 11,670 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

018 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 8,700 8,700 8,700 8,700 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

019 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ......................................................................... 3,674 3,674 3,674 3,674 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
794 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

020 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ................................................... 1,459 1,459 1,459 1,459 021 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ............................................................... 5,043 5,043 5,043 5,043 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 6,754 1,478,718 6,754 1,464,223 6,754 1,280,218 –17,495 6,754 1,461,223 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ................................................................................ 100 632,994 100 632,994 100 606,894 –26,100 100 606,894 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–26,100 ] [–26,100 ] 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

005 STRYKER (MOD) .................................................................................... 52,797 52,797 51,497 –1,300 51,497 

Excess program management ..................................................... [–1,300 ] [–1,300 ] 

006 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ............................................................................. 43,962 43,962 35,162 –8,880 35,082 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–8,800 ] [–8,880 ] 

007 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .................................................................. 250,710 403,710 250,710 250,710 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [153,000 ] 

008 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ................................... 46,876 46,876 46,876 46,876 009 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ........................... 10,452 10,452 6,452 –3,000 7,452 

Excess contractor engineering .................................................... [–4,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

010 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE .............................................................. 19 99,904 19 99,904 19 95,904 –2,900 19 97,004 

Unjustified growth in matrix support and engineering change 

proposals.

[–4,000 ] [–2,900 ] 

011 M88 FOV MODS .................................................................................... 32,483 32,483 32,483 32,483

013 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) ..................................................................... 160,578 160,578 131,178 –29,400 131,178 

Unjustified technical support costs ............................................ [–29,400 ] [–29,400 ] 

014 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM .............................................................. 21 181,329 21 453,329 21 421,329 49 255,000 70 436,329 

Program increase to add 49 tanks to bridge production gap ... [272,000 ] [240,000 ] [49 ] [255,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

015 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) ........................................... 1,073 1,073 1,073 1,073 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

017 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY .............................. 5 16,046 5 16,046 5 –16,046 5 0 

Transfer at Army’s request to RDTE, Army PE 64601A .............. [–16,046 ] [–16,046 ] 

019 MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL ........................................................ 4,700 65,102 4,700 65,102 4,700 –65,102 4,700 0 

Transfer at Army request to WTCV line 34 ................................. [–34,000 ] [–34,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
795 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–31,102 ] [–31,102 ] 

020 LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN ........................................... 700 28,796 700 28,796 700 13,931 –14,866 700 13,930 

Army revised lower quantity ........................................................ [–13,165 ] [–13,166 ] Transfer at Army request to RDTE Army PE 64601A ............. [–1,700 ] [–1,700 ] 

023 MORTAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 142 12,477 142 12,477 142 10,177 –2,300 142 10,177 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–2,300 ] [–2,300 ] 

025 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ...................................... 2,873 12,055 2,873 12,055 2,873 12,055 2,873 12,055 027 M4 CARBINE ......................................................................................... 19,409 35,015 19,409 35,015 19,409 35,015 19,409 35,015 028 SHOTGUN, MODULAR ACCESSORY SYSTEM (MASS) ............................. 3,038 6,707 3,038 6,707 3,038 4,207 3,038 6,707 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–2,500 ] 

031 HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) ............................................................... 13,066 13,066 13,066 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–13,066 ] 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

033 M4 CARBINE MODS .............................................................................. 25,092 25,092 25,092 25,092 034 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 14,856 14,856 34,000 48,856 

Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 19 ............................ [34,000 ] [34,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–48,856 ] 

035 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 8,480 8,480 8,480 8,480 036 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................... 15,718 15,718 15,718 15,718 037 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ............................................................ 1,994 4,500 1,994 1,994 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [2,506 ] 

038 M119 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 38,701 38,701 38,701 38,701 039 M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................. 3,476 3,476 3,476 3,476 041 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ............................... 2,973 2,973 2,973 2,973 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

043 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) ........................................ 10,080 10,080 10,080 10,080 044 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................ 424 424 424 424 045 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ................................. 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 

SPARES 

046 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (WTCV) .................................................... 106,843 106,843 106,843 106,843 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 31,007 1,933,512 31,007 2,361,018 31,007 1,971,177 49 119,106 31,056 2,052,618 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

001 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 210,758 210,758 210,758 210,758 002 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 83,730 83,730 83,730 83,730 004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 9,064 9,064 7,064 –2,000 7,064 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 131,775 131,775 131,775 131,775007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 14,894 14,894 10,594 –1,200 13,694 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
796 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Prior year funds available ........................................................... [–4,300 ] [–1,200 ] 

008 OBJECTIVE FAMILY OF WEAPONS AMMUNITION, ALL T ......................... 3,399 3,399 –3,399 0 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–3,399 ] [–3,399 ] 

009 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 118,966 118,966 105,966 –13,000 105,966 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–13,000 ] [–13,000 ] 

010 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 84,799 84,799 34,799 –2,200 82,599 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–50,000 ] [–2,200 ] 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

012 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 31,287 31,287 31,287 31,287 013 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 12,187 12,187 12,187 12,187 014 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ................................................................ 108,416 108,416 98,416 –1,500 106,916 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–10,000 ] [–1,500 ] 

TANK AMMUNITION 

015 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES ......................... 105,704 105,704 105,205 –40,499 65,205 

Pricing adjustment ...................................................................... [–40,000 ] Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–499 ] [–499 ] 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

017 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM AND 105MM, ALL TYP ....................... 103,227 103,227 103,227 103,227 019 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 32,887 32,887 32,887 32,887 020 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 .............................................. 69,074 69,074 48,074 –11,000 58,074 

Program restructure .................................................................... [–21,000 ] [–11,000 ] 

021 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ......................... 48,205 48,205 46,705 –1,500 46,705 

Pricing adjustment ...................................................................... [–1,500 ] [–1,500 ] 

MINES 

023 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES .......................................... 2,518 2,518 2,518 2,518 

NETWORKED MUNITIONS 

025 SPIDER NETWORK MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ........................................... 43,123 43,123 15,423 43,123 

Full rate production delay ........................................................... [–27,700 ] 

ROCKETS 

027 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................... 19,254 19,254 17,854 –1,400 17,854 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–1,400 ] [–1,400 ] 

028 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 127,265 127,265 127,265 –3,400 123,865 

Excess production engineering .................................................... [–3,400 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
797 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

029 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 53,685 53,685 53,685 –15,000 38,685 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–15,000 ] 

030 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 42,558 42,558 40,558 42,558 

Grenade Rifle Entry Munition—Army offered reduction ............. [–2,000 ] 

031 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 26,173 26,173 26,173 26,173 032 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 14,108 14,108 6,108 14,108 

Army offered reduction—M115A2 Simulators ............................ [–4,000 ] Army offered reduction—M116A1 Simulators ............................ [–4,000 ] 

033 ALL OTHER (AMMO) .............................................................................. 50 50 50 50 

MISCELLANEOUS 

034 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES ......................................................... 18,296 18,296 18,296 18,296 035 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES ................................................. 14,864 14,864 14,864 14,864 036 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 5,449 5,449 5,449 5,449 037 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 11,009 11,009 11,009 11,009 038 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .................................................... 24,200 24,200 24,200 24,200 039 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................................... 13,711 13,711 13,711 13,711 040 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES .......................................................................... 103 103 103 –103 0 

Prior year funds available ........................................................... [–103 ] 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

041 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................................. 199,841 199,841 199,841 199,841 042 LAYAWAY OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................................... 9,451 9,451 9,451 9,451 043 MAINTENANCE OF INACTIVE FACILITIES ................................................ 5,533 5,533 1,533 5,533 

Army offered reduction ................................................................ [–4,000 ] 

044 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL ............................ 189,789 189,789 177,789 –12,000 177,789 

Contract award delay .................................................................. [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

045 ARMS INITIATIVE ................................................................................... 3,273 3,273 3,273 3,273 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 1,992,625 1,992,625 1,831,827 –108,201 1,884,424 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ..................................................................... 102 13,496 102 13,496 102 596 –12,900 102 596 

Early to need ............................................................................... [–12,900 ] [–12,900 ] 

005 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 2,390 432,936 2,390 432,936 2,390 422,936 –10,000 2,390 422,936 

Unjustified program management cost growth .......................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

006 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............................... 21,930 21,930 21,930 21,930 007 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 627,294 627,294 555,294 –29,500 597,794 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–72,000 ] Exceeds annual manufacturing capability ................................. [–27,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
798 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Excessive program management and engineering change orders. [–2,500 ] 

008 PLS ESP ................................................................................................ 251,667 251,667 251,667 251,667 010 MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY ..................................................... 56,671 56,671 56,671 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–48,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–8,671 ] 

012 TRUCK, TRACTOR, LINE HAUL, M915/M916 ......................................... 6 1,461 6 1,461 6 –1,461 6 0 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–1,461 ] [–1,461 ] 

013 HVY EZPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV .......................... 412 156,747 412 156,747 412 156,747 412 156,747 014 HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM ................................................. 161,631 161,631 4,313 –157,318 4,313 

Funding provided in approved prior year reprogramming action [–157,318 ] [–157,318 ] 

015 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS .................................. 39,908 39,908 39,908 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–39,908 ] 

016 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .......................................................... 362,672 362,672 344,772 –17,900 344,772 

Excessive program support costs ............................................... [–14,000 ] [–14,000 ] HMMWV installation early to need .............................................. [–3,900 ] [–3,900 ] 

017 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 142,862 142,862 –15,000 127,862 

Excessive program support costs ............................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–127,862 ] 

020 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS, OPA1 ................................................................. 20,156 20,156 –20,156 0 

Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–20,156 ] [–20,156 ] 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

021 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ...................................................................... 6 1,161 6 1,161 6 1,161 6 1,161 022 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 3,222 3,222 3,222 3,222 023 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .......................................................... 19,869 19,869 19,869 19,869 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

024 JOINT COMBAT IDENTIFICATION MARKING SYSTEM .............................. 9,984 9,984 9,984 9,984 025 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ................................... 3,931 974,186 3,931 974,186 3,931 865,186 –109,000 3,931 865,186 

Increment 2 contract delay ......................................................... [–109,000 ] [–109,000 ] 

026 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ............................................................ 4,826 4,826 4,826 4,826 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

028 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ......................... 3 123,859 3 123,859 3 123,859 3 123,859 029 SHF TERM ............................................................................................. 2 8,910 2 8,910 2 8,910 –661 2 8,249 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
799 

Full funding for engineering change proposals in prior years .. [–661 ] 

031 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................ 6,312 29,568 6,312 29,568 6,312 25,168 –3,200 6,312 26,368 

Fielding cost growth .................................................................... [–4,400 ] [–3,200 ] 

032 SMART-T (SPACE) ................................................................................. 49,704 49,704 49,704 49,704

033 SCAMP (SPACE) .................................................................................... 2,415 2,415 2,415 2,415 034 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ................................................................ 73,374 73,374 64,774 –8,600 64,774 

Excessive unit cost growth ......................................................... [–8,600 ] [–8,600 ] 

035 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ........................................................ 140 31,799 140 31,799 140 31,799 140 31,799 

COMM—COMBAT SUPPORT COMM 

036 MOD-IN-SERVICE PROFILER .................................................................. 969 969 969 969 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

037 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ................................... 18,788 18,788 18,788 18,788 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

038 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) .............................. 3,994 3,994 3,994 3,994 039 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ........................................................... 17,120 775,832 17,120 681,532 17,120 206,087 –348,733 17,120 427,099 

Airborne, Maritime, Fixed Station program delay ....................... [–108,000 ] [–106,000 ] Army requested transfer to RDTE Navy line 100 ........................ [–51,000 ] [–51,000 ] Ground Mobile Radio program restructure ................................. [–57,800 ] [–153,833 ] [–153,833 ] Manpack radio program delay .................................................... [–256,912 ] Program Decrease - Maritime/Fixed Station ............................... [–36,500 ] [–37,900 ] 

040 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) ..................................................... 8,336 8,336 8,336 8,336 041 SINCGARS FAMILY ................................................................................. 4,992 4,992 500 –4,492 500 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–4,492 ] [–4,492 ] 

043 TRACTOR DESK ..................................................................................... 10,827 10,827 10,827 10,827 045 SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT ................................................. 36,224 36,224 14,024 36,224 

Program delay ............................................................................. [–22,200 ] 

047 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS ................... 1,843 1,843 1,843 1,843 049 GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) ................................................... 87 3,939 87 3,939 87 3,939 –2,939 87 1,000

Early to need ............................................................................... [–2,939 ] 

050 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY .................................................. 550 38,535 550 38,535 550 29,435 550 38,535 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–9,100 ] 

051 MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE (MC4) .............................. 957 26,232 957 26,232 957 26,232 957 26,232 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 

053 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE ........................................................... 1,547 1,547 1,547 1,547 054 CIVIL AFFAIRS/INFO OPS ....................................................................... 28,266 28,266 28,266 28,266 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

055 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) .................................................... 499 12,541 499 12,541 499 11,441 499 12,541

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–1,100 ] 

056 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP ............................... 39,349 39,349 39,349 –2,327 37,022 

Army requested transfer to line 56a .......................................... [–2,327 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
800 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

056A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS ........................................................................ 2,327 2,327 

Army requested transfer from line 56 ........................................ [2,327 ] 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

057 TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION ............................................................... 2,232 2,232 2,232 2,232 058 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................... 37,780 37,780 37,780 37,780 059 WW TECH CON IMP PROG (WWTCIP) .................................................... 12,805 12,805 12,805 12,805 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 164 187,227 164 187,227 164 131,227 –56,000 164 131,227 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–56,000 ] [–56,000 ] 

061 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) ...................................................... 4,393 4,393 4,393 4,393 062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM( ...................... 310,761 310,761 310,761 310,761 063 PENTAGON INFORMATION MGT AND TELECOM ..................................... 4,992 4,992 4,992 4,992 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

066 JTT/CIBS-M ............................................................................................ 4,657 4,657 4,657 4,657 

067 PROPHET GROUND ................................................................................ 23 72,041 23 72,041 23 72,041 23 72,041 070 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 144,548 144,548 –20,000 124,548 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–124,548 ] Unjustified growth ....................................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

071 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) .......................................... 5 1,199 5 1,199 5 1,199 5 1,199 072 TROJAN (MIP) ........................................................................................ 32,707 32,707 32,707 32,707 

073 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ........................................... 9,163 9,163 9,163 9,163 074 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) (MIP ........................ 3,493 3,493 3,493 3,493 075 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP) ............................................................ 802 802 802 802 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

076 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 10 33,810 10 33,810 10 10 33,810 

Requirement met with prior year funds ..................................... [–33,810 ] 

077 CREW .................................................................................................... 24,104 24,104 –24,104 0 

Requirement met with prior year funds ..................................... [–24,104 ] [–24,104 ] 

080 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 1,252 1,252 1,252 1,252 081 CI MODERNIZATION ............................................................................... 1,332 1,332 1,332 1,332 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 FAAD GBS ............................................................................................. 7,958 7,958 7,958 –4,000 3,958 

Violates full funding ................................................................... [–4,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
801 

083 SENTINEL MODS .................................................................................... 47 41,657 47 41,657 47 41,657 47 41,657 084 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ..................................................... 5,831 47,498 5,831 47,498 5,831 47,498 5,831 47,498 085 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ......................................................................... 8,793 156,204 8,793 156,204 8,793 151,704 8,793 156,204 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–4,500 ] 

086 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ................... 118 102,334 118 102,334 118 102,334 118 102,334 087 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ................................................... 186,859 186,859 143,059 186,859 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–43,800 ] 

088 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............................... 10,227 10,227 8,027 10,227 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–2,200 ] 

090 COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-RAM) ............................ 7 15,774 7 15,774 7 7 15,774 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–15,774 ] 

092 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM .................................................. 25,356 25,356 25,356 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–6,300 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–19,056 ] 

095 PROFILER .............................................................................................. 1 3,312 1 3,312 1 3,312 1 3,312 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 3,005 3,005 3,005 3,005 098 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................................... 69,514 69,514 20,014 69,514 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–49,500 ] 

099 LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/RANGEFINDER ................................ 171 58,042 171 58,042 171 58,042 171 58,042 101 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................... 21,022 21,022 21,022 –4,000 17,022 

Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

102 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 16 227,629 16 227,629 16 170,529 16 227,629 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–57,100 ] 

103 ARMS CONTROL ENHANCED SENSOR & MONITORING SYSTEM ............ 2,226 2,226 2,226 2,226 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

104 TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS ......................................................... 80 54,907 80 54,907 80 54,907 80 54,907

105 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY .................................................................... 898 54,223 898 54,223 898 37,423 898 54,223 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–16,800 ] 

106 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (BC ................... 612 12,454 612 12,454 612 7,754 612 12,454 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–4,700 ] 

107 FAAD C2 ................................................................................................ 5,030 5,030 5,030 5,030 

108 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............................... 9 62,710 9 62,710 9 54,910 9 62,710 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–7,800 ] 

109 KNIGHT FAMILY ..................................................................................... 12 51,488 12 51,488 12 32,202 –5,000 12 46,488 

Program growth adjustment ....................................................... [–19,286 ] [–5,000 ] 

110 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ............................................. 1,807 1,807 1,807 1,807 111 AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................... 28,924 28,924 19,524 –1,600 27,324 

Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–9,400 ] [–1,600 ] 

115 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 498 34,031 498 34,031 498 34,031 498 34,031116 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................................... 26,660 210,312 26,660 210,312 26,660 124,026 –86,286 26,660 124,026 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
802 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Army identified excess ................................................................ [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] Army requested transfer to OMA Budget Activity 04 ................. [–60,240 ] [–9,251 ] Army requested transfer to OPA line 119 ................................... [–1,795 ] [–1,795 ] Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 177 ....................... [–9,251 ] [–60,240 ] 

117 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ........................ 19,113 19,113 19,113 19,113 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

119 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM ................................. 23,664 23,664 25,459 1,795 25,459 

Army requested transfer from OPA line 116 .............................. [1,795 ] [1,795 ] 

120 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ......................................................... 11,192 11,192 11,192 11,192 121 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP ................................................ 220,250 220,250 174,772 –45,478 174,772 

Army identified excess ................................................................ [–10,478 ] [–10,478 ] Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–35,000 ] [–35,000 ] 

122 CSS COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................... 452 39,310 452 39,310 452 39,310 452 39,310 123 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................................ 41,248 41,248 41,248 41,248 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

124 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ............................................................ 10,437 10,437 10,437 10,437 125 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ............................... 168 7,480 168 7,480 168 4,395 –3,085 168 4,395 

Excessive design engineering costs ............................................ [–3,085 ] [–3,085 ] 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

126 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ..................................................... 571 571 571 571 127 BCT NETWORK ...................................................................................... 20,334 0 

Budget Adjustment per Army Request ........................................ [20,334 ] 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS UNDISTRIBUTED 

127A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 4,273 4,273 4,273 4,273 

127U UNDISTRIBUTED OPA2 .......................................................................... 4,000 0 

Electronic Equipment—Automation ............................................ [4,000 ] 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

129 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 8,636 8,636 5,213 –3,423 5,213 

Accoustic hailing device contract delay ..................................... [–3,423 ] [–3,423 ] 

130 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 41,204 47,204 41,204 

Base Defense Systems ................................................................ [6,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–41,204 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
803 

131 CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION ................................................................ 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 132 SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) ......................... 362 362 362 362 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

133 TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................. 77,428 77,428 77,428 77,428 134 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ....................................................... 49,154 49,154 45,454 –3,700 45,454 

Excessive program support cost growth ..................................... [–3,700 ] [–3,700 ] 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

135 HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST ....................... 39,263 39,263 39,263 39,263 136 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ........................... 20,678 20,678 20,678 20,678 137 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ...................................... 30,297 30,297 –8,000 22,297 

M160 incremental funding .......................................................... [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–22,297 ] 

138 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 17,626 17,626 17,626 17,626 139 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ............................................................ 14,672 14,672 14,672 14,672 140 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT ..................................................... 7,352 7,352 7,352 7,352 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

142 HEATERS AND ECU’S ............................................................................ 10,109 10,109 10,109 10,109 144 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ....................................................................... 9,591 9,591 9,591 9,591 146 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) .............................. 8,509 8,509 8,509 8,509 147 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ................................................................... 184,072 156,072 4,000 –120,572 63,500 

Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 119 ....................... [–7,600 ] [–13,100 ] Program delay ............................................................................. [–172,472 ] [–107,472 ] Schedule Slip- Nett Warrior, Increment One ............................... [–28,000 ] 

148 MOUNTED SOLDIER SYSTEM ................................................................. 43,419 43,419 19 –38,419 5,000 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–43,400 ] [–38,419 ] 

150 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 26,860 26,860 26,860 26,860 151 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM .................... 68,392 68,392 55,392 68,392 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–13,000 ] 

152 MOBILE INTEGRATED REMAINS COLLECTION SYSTEM: ......................... 7,384 7,384 7,384 7,384 153 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ........................ 54,190 54,190 54,190 54,190 154 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ....................................................... 12,482 12,482 12,482 12,482 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

156 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................. 75,457 75,457 75,457 75,457 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

158 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ................................................................. 53,450 53,450 53,450 53,450 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

159 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS ...................................... 16,572 16,572 16,572 16,572 160 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) .................................................. 3,852 3,852 3,852 3,852 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

161 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ............................................... 2,201 2,201 2,201 2,201 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
804 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

162 SKID STEER LOADER (SSL) FAMILY OF SYSTEM ................................... 54 8,584 54 8,584 54 3,984 –4,600 54 3,984 

Excessive unit cost and program support cost growth .............. [–4,600 ] [–4,600 ] 

163 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING ................................................................... 30 21,031 30 21,031 30 21,031 30 21,031 164 MISSION MODULES - ENGINEERING ..................................................... 43,432 43,432 43,432 43,432 165 COMPACTOR .......................................................................................... 2,859 2,859 2,859 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–2,859 ] 

168 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ..................................................................... 171 59,534 171 59,534 171 50,434 –9,100 171 50,434 

Unjustified program support cost growth ................................... [–9,100 ] [–9,100 ] 

169 PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING ....................................................................... 4 8,314 4 8,314 4 614 –7,700 4 614 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–7,700 ] [–7,700 ] 

170 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR TYPE - FOS ............................ 18,974 18,974 18,974 18,974 171 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPA .............................. 15,833 15,833 –15,833 0 

Unexecutable acquisition strategy .............................................. [–15,833 ] [–15,833 ] 

172 CONST EQUIP ESP ................................................................................ 9,771 9,771 9,771 9,771 173 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ............................................ 12,654 12,654 12,654 12,654 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

174 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ....................................................... 1 223,845 1 223,845 1 223,845 –223,845 1 0 

Army requested transfer to SC,N line 17 ................................... [–187,226 ] Excess to need ............................................................................ [–36,619 ] 

176 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................................ 10,175 10,175 10,175 10,175 

GENERATORS 

177 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP ................................................ 31,897 41,897 31,897 31,897 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [10,000 ] 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

179 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS ........................................................................... 101 10,944 101 10,944 101 10,944 101 10,944 180 ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM ................................................... 135 21,859 135 21,859 135 21,859 135 21,859 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

181 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................ 133,178 133,178 47,878 –87,061 46,117 

Army offered program reduction ................................................. [–85,300 ] [–87,061 ] 

182 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM .......................................................... 168,392 168,392 168,392 168,392 183 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ..................................................... 17,760 17,760 13,290 –4,470 13,290 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–4,470 ] [–4,470 ] 

184 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER ................................... 9,413 9,413 9,413 9,413 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
805 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

186 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 13,618 13,618 13,618 13,618 187 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ................................ 49,437 49,437 36,937 –12,500 36,937 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–12,500 ] [–12,500 ] 

188 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ........................................ 30,451 30,451 30,451 30,451 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

189 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 4,923 4,923 4,923 4,923 190 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ................................................. 69,316 69,316 19,606 –49,710 19,606 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–49,710 ] [–49,710 ] 

191 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 1,591 1,591 1,591 1,591 192 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) ................................... 72,271 72,271 72,271 72,271 193 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) ..................................................... 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 194 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................................ 17,411 17,411 17,411 17,411 195 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 .................................................................. 34,500 34,500 34,500 34,500 196 TRACTOR YARD ..................................................................................... 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 197 BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE ...................................................... 24,805 93,832 24,805 

Budget Adjustment per Army Request ........................................ [69,027 ] Program adjustment .................................................................... [–24,805 ] 

198 BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT .............................................. 149,308 26,011 26,008 –123,300 26,008 

Program cancelation ................................................................... [–123,297 ] [–123,300 ] [–123,300 ] 

199 BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT INC 2 .................................... 57,103 3 –57,103 0 

Program cancelation ................................................................... [–57,103 ] [–57,100 ] [–57,103 ] 

200 BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE INC 2 ........................................... 11,924 24 –11,924 0 

Program cancelation ................................................................... [–11,924 ] [–11,900 ] [–11,924 ] 

OPA2 

201 INITIAL SPARES - C&E .......................................................................... 33 21,647 33 21,647 33 21,647 33 21,647 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 77,621 9,682,592 77,621 9,477,329 77,621 7,050,774 –1,770,878 77,621 7,911,714 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .......................................................................................... 220,634 220,634 –220,634 0 

Transfer to OCO: JIEDDO Operations ........................................... [–220,634 ] [–220,634 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND ................ 220,634 220,634 –220,634 0 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................. 12 1,079,364 12 1,079,364 12 1,072,364 –84,768 12 994,596 

Avionics PGSE cost growth ......................................................... [–36,000 ] 

CFE Electronics cost growth ....................................................... [–26,600 ] Engine cost growth ..................................................................... [–9,168 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
806 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Other ILS cost growth ................................................................. [–6,000 ] Reduce Engineering Change Orders (ECO) to fiscal year 2010 

levels.

[–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

002 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 28,119 28,119 28,119 28,119 003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET .............................................................. 28 2,366,752 28 2,366,752 28 1,772,052 –126,568 28 2,240,184 

Armament cost growth ................................................................ [–2,548 ] 

CFE Electronics cost growth ....................................................... [–15,540 ] ECO excess .................................................................................. [–21,000 ] [–21,000 ] Engine cost growth ..................................................................... [–15,000 ] Funded in H. R. 1473 ................................................................. [–495,000 ] Government furnished equipment engine cost growth ............... [–10,700 ] [–4,480 ] Multi-year procurement savings ................................................. [–68,000 ] [–68,000 ] 

004 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 64,962 64,962 63,262 –1,700 63,262 

Airframe termination liability growth .......................................... [–1,700 ] [–1,700 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV .................................................................... 7 1,503,096 7 1,503,096 7 1,503,096 –55,000 7 1,448,096 

Engineering change order carryover ........................................... [–20,000 ] 

Logistic support growth .............................................................. [–5,000 ] Peculiar ground support equipment growth ............................... [–30,000 ] 

006 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 217,666 217,666 217,666 –108,600 109,066 

Reduce advance procurement ..................................................... [–108,600 ] 

007 JSF STOVL ............................................................................................. 6 1,141,933 6 1,141,933 6 1,141,933 6 1,141,933 008 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 117,229 117,229 117,229 117,229 009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ............................................................................ 30 2,224,817 30 2,224,817 30 2,214,317 –25,500 30 2,199,317 

Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–10,500 ] [–10,500 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–15,000 ] 

010 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 84,008 84,008 84,008 –20,240 63,768 

Advance procurement equipment cost growth ........................... [–20,240 ] 

011 UH–1Y/AH–1Z ....................................................................................... 25 700,306 25 700,306 25 664,306 –47,745 25 652,561 

AH–1Z (new build) GFE Electronics cost growth ........................ [–2,345 ] AH–1Z (remanufacture) airframe cost growth ........................... [–9,400 ] Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] Unjustified support increase ....................................................... [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

012 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 68,310 68,310 68,310 –11,560 56,750 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
807 

Excess advance procurement ...................................................... [–11,560 ] 

013 MH–60S (MYP) ..................................................................................... 18 408,921 18 408,921 18 408,921 –8,300 18 400,621 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–8,300 ] 

014 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 74,040 74,040 74,040 74,040 015 MH–60R ................................................................................................ 24 791,025 24 791,025 24 786,825 –15,500 24 775,525 

Reduce ECO ................................................................................. [–4,200 ] [–4,200 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–11,300 ] 

016 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 209,431 209,431 209,431 209,431 017 P–8A POSEIDON .................................................................................... 11 2,018,851 11 2,018,851 11 2,018,851 –10,000 11 2,008,851 

Support funding increase ............................................................ [–10,000 ] 

018 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 256,594 256,594 256,594 –11,700 244,894 

Excess advance procurement ...................................................... [–11,700 ] 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ............................................................................. 5 914,892 5 914,892 5 894,892 –28,000 5 886,892 

Excess funding reserve ............................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–8,000 ] 

020 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 157,942 157,942 157,942 157,942 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

022 JPATS .................................................................................................... 36 266,906 36 266,906 36 256,906 –10,000 36 256,906 

Excess ECO .................................................................................. [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

024 KC–130J ................................................................................................ 1 87,288 1 87,288 1 87,288 1 87,288 

026 MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................ 12 191,986 12 191,986 12 191,986 12 191,986 027 STUASL0 UAV ........................................................................................ 8 12,772 8 12,772 8 –12,772 8 0 

Low rate initial production contract award slip ......................... [–12,772 ] [–12,772 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 27,734 27,734 27,734 27,734 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 34,065 34,065 31,765 –2,300 31,765 

Air launched decoy jammer ........................................................ [–2,300 ] [–2,300 ] 

031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 30,762 30,762 30,762 –1,600 29,162 

Non-recurring installation funding unjustified increase ............ [–1,600 ] 

032 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 499,597 499,597 445,597 –74,430 425,167 

Digital Communications System reduce quantities .................... [–14,000 ] ECP 904 Part 1 cost growth ....................................................... [–6,930 ] 

ECP 904 Part 1 procurement ahead of need ............................. [–16,500 ] Integrated Logistics Support excess to need .............................. [–20,900 ] [–20,900 ] Net Centric Operations reduce A kits ......................................... [–6,300 ] OSIP 001–10 ANAV installation kits cost growth ....................... [–1,000 ] OSIP 011–84 installation funds savings .................................... [–9,300 ] OSIP 11–99 installation funding ahead of need ....................... [–7,000 ] Other support growth .................................................................. [–12,800 ] [–12,800 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
808 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

033 H–46 SERIES ........................................................................................ 27,112 27,112 24,612 –2,500 24,612 

Unjustified Request ..................................................................... [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] 

034 AH–1W SERIES ..................................................................................... 15,828 15,828 15,828 15,828 035 H–53 SERIES ........................................................................................ 62,820 62,820 61,820 –2,500 60,320 

DIRCM Other support excess ....................................................... [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] Kapton wiring installation kit cost growth ................................. [–1,500 ] 

036 SH–60 SERIES ...................................................................................... 83,394 87,894 83,394 83,394 

SH–60 Crew and Passenger Survivability Upgrades .................. [4,500 ] 

037 H–1 SERIES .......................................................................................... 11,012 11,012 8,412 –2,600 8,412 

Obsolescence install unjustified growth ..................................... [–2,600 ] [–2,600 ] 

038 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 83,181 83,181 83,181 –9,500 73,681 

Obsolescence ECP installation funding growth .......................... [–2,700 ] OSIP 11–01 JMOD obsolescence carryover ................................. [–5,100 ] Other support growth .................................................................. [–1,700 ] 

039 P–3 SERIES .......................................................................................... 171,466 171,466 169,766 –1,000 170,466 

HFIP modification kit procurement ahead of need ..................... [–1,000 ] 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–1,700 ] 

040 E–2 SERIES .......................................................................................... 29,215 29,215 29,215 29,215 

041 TRAINER A/C SERIES ............................................................................ 22,090 22,090 18,790 –3,300 18,790 

Training equipment growth ......................................................... [–3,300 ] [–3,300 ] 

042 C–2A ..................................................................................................... 16,302 16,302 16,302 16,302 043 C–130 SERIES ...................................................................................... 27,139 27,139 27,139 27,139 

044 FLEET EW .............................................................................................. 2,773 2,773 1,773 –1,000 1,773 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] 

045 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ........................................................... 16,463 16,463 16,463 16,463 046 E–6 SERIES .......................................................................................... 165,253 165,253 130,653 –17,200 148,053 

Block I install cost savings ........................................................ [–1,200 ] [–1,200 ] Block II FAB-T non-recurring engineering early to need ............ [–5,200 ] [–5,200 ] Block Recapture program delay .................................................. [–20,400 ] OSIP 008–10 support funding growth ........................................ [–2,000 ] 

OSIP 013–10 support funding growth ........................................ [–1,000 ] Service life extension program install early to need .................. [–7,800 ] [–7,800 ] 

047 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................................ 58,011 58,011 82,011 19,500 77,511 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
809 

Navy requested transfer from RDT&E, Navy line 98, for VH–3/ 

VH–60 sustainment.

[24,000 ] [24,000 ] 

OSIP 009–02 excess installation funding .................................. [–4,500 ] 

048 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 12,248 12,248 11,048 –1,200 11,048 

Install equipment nonrecurring unjustified growth .................... [–1,200 ] [–1,200 ] 

049 T–45 SERIES ......................................................................................... 57,779 57,779 45,179 –12,000 45,779 

Avionics Obsolescence contract support growth ........................ [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] Correction of Deficiencies contract support growth ................... [–6,600 ] [–6,000 ] 

050 AIRCRAFT POWER PLANT CHANGES ...................................................... 21,847 21,847 21,847 21,847 051 JPATS SERIES ........................................................................................ 1,524 1,524 524 –1,000 524 

Unobligated balances .................................................................. [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] 

052 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ............................................................ 1,069 1,069 1,069 1,069 053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 92,072 92,072 89,272 –28,300 63,772 

DIRCM A kit savings ................................................................... [–2,800 ] [–2,800 ] 

IDECM Block IV concurrency ....................................................... [–25,500 ] 

054 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 147,093 147,093 138,293 –10,800 136,293 

CNS/ATM Other support growth .................................................. [–8,800 ] [–8,800 ] OSIP 01–02 other support growth .............................................. [–2,000 ] 

056 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 37,330 37,330 32,030 –5,300 32,030 

Other support growth .................................................................. [–5,300 ] [–5,300 ] 

057 P–8 SERIES .......................................................................................... 2,930 2,930 –2,930 0 

P–8 modifications ahead of need .............................................. [–2,930 ] [–2,930 ] 

058 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ..................................................................... 489 489 489 489 059 RQ–7 SERIES ........................................................................................ 11,419 11,419 11,419 –11,419 0 

TCDL contract delay .................................................................... [–11,419 ] 

060 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ........................................................ 60,264 60,264 55,764 –4,500 55,764 

Deficiencies modifications other support growth ....................... [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] 

Reliability modifications other support growth .......................... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 1,331,961 1,331,961 1,171,994 –168,667 1,163,294 

E–2D initial spares cost growth ................................................. [–8,700 ] F/A–18E/F initial spares cost growth ......................................... [–23,967 ] [–23,967 ] F–35 initial spares execution ..................................................... [–100,000 ] [–100,000 ] P–8A initial spares execution ..................................................... [–36,000 ] [–36,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

062 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 351,685 351,685 363,685 12,000 363,685 

Transfer from PE 64273N (RDN 98) for VH–60 trainer ............. [12,000 ] [12,000 ] 

063 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 22,358 22,358 22,358 22,358 064 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 27,300 27,300 27,300 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–27,300 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
810 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

065 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 10,124 10,124 10,124 10,124 066 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 24,395 24,395 21,395 –3,000 21,395 

Unjustified support increase ....................................................... [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

067 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 1,719 1,719 1,719 1,719 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 223 18,587,033 223 18,591,533 223 17,593,764 –913,499 223 17,673,534 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS .................................................................................. 24 1,309,102 24 1,309,102 24 1,309,102 –10,000 24 1,299,102 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–10,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................... 3,492 3,492 3,492 3,492 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ............................................................................................ 196 303,306 196 303,306 196 303,306 –5,700 196 297,606 

Submarine capsules cost growth ................................................ [–5,700 ] 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 161 188,494 161 188,494 161 119,494 –83,375 161 105,119 

All Up Round Missile contract delay .......................................... [–69,000 ] [–83,375 ] 

005 SIDEWINDER .......................................................................................... 132 47,098 132 47,098 132 47,098 –4,900 132 42,198 

Excess Block II support ............................................................... [–4,900 ] 

006 JSOW ..................................................................................................... 266 137,722 266 137,722 266 137,722 –6,000 266 131,722 

All Up Round Missile cost growth .............................................. [–6,000 ] 

007 STANDARD MISSILE ............................................................................... 89 420,324 89 420,324 89 362,278 –63,446 89 356,878 

Installation and check out funding growth ................................ [–1,900 ] Support funding growth .............................................................. [–3,500 ] Unit Cost efficiencies .................................................................. [–58,046 ] [–58,046 ] 

008 RAM ...................................................................................................... 61 66,197 61 66,197 61 66,197 61 66,197 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 281 22,703 281 22,703 281 22,703 281 22,703 011 AERIAL TARGETS ................................................................................... 46,359 46,359 46,359 46,359 

012 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,561 3,561 3,561 3,561 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

013 ESSM ..................................................................................................... 35 48,486 35 48,486 35 48,486 35 48,486 014 HARM MODS ......................................................................................... 72 73,061 72 73,061 72 73,061 –1,500 72 71,561 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
811 

Production support growth .......................................................... [–1,500 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 1,979 1,979 1,979 1,979 017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ................................................... 238,215 238,215 33,215 238,215 

Booster for SV4 early to need ..................................................... [–205,000 ] 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

019 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 52,255 52,255 52,255 52,255 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

020 ASW TARGETS ....................................................................................... 31,803 31,803 31,803 31,803 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ....................................................................... 45 78,045 45 78,045 45 78,045 –1,440 45 76,605 

MK–54 array cost growth ............................................................ [–1,440 ] 

022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ........................................................... 48 42,493 48 42,493 48 42,493 48 42,493 023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ............................................................................... 5,770 5,770 5,770 5,770 

023A UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................... 5,000 0 

Modification of Torpedoes and Related Equipment .................... [5,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 43,003 43,003 43,003 43,003 025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT .......................................................................... 9,219 9,219 9,219 9,219 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 3,553 3,553 3,553 3,553 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 15,037 15,037 15,037 15,037 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ........................................................................................... 37,550 37,550 37,550 37,550 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS ...................................................................... 17,525 17,525 17,525 –8,346 9,179 

MK–110 57MM contract delay .................................................... [–8,346 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ............................................................................... 43,957 43,957 43,957 43,957 032 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ................................................... 50,013 50,013 50,013 50,013 033 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ........................................ 12,203 12,203 12,203 12,203 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

035 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 55,953 55,953 55,953 –6,339 49,614 

CIWS replenishment spares execution ........................................ [–6,339 ] 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 1,410 3,408,478 1,410 3,413,478 1,410 3,076,432 –191,046 1,410 3,217,432 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY OTHER WARSHIPS 

002 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 554,798 554,798 554,798 554,798 003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ................................................................ 2 3,232,215 2 3,232,215 2 3,232,215 –10,901 2 3,221,314 

Exterior Communications System other cost unjustfied growth [–1,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
812 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Propulsor cost growth ................................................................. [–5,538 ] Sonar hardware pricing cost growth .......................................... [–4,363 ] 

004 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ................................................................ 1,524,761 1,524,761 1,524,761 –63,400 1,461,361 

Nuclear long lead CFE advance procurement cost growth ........ [–63,400 ] 

006 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS ................................................................ 529,652 529,652 529,652 529,652 008 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................. 453,727 453,727 453,727 453,727 009 DDG–51 ................................................................................................ 1 1,980,709 1 1,980,709 1 1,980,709 1 1,980,709 010 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 100,723 100,723 100,723 100,723 011 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP ....................................................................... 4 1,802,093 4 1,802,093 4 1,802,093 –47,000 4 1,755,093 

Basic construction cost growth .................................................. [–47,000 ] 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

013 LPD–17 ................................................................................................. 1 1,847,444 1 1,847,444 1 1,847,444 –10,000 1 1,837,444 

Excess ECO funding .................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

015 LHA REPLACEMENT ............................................................................... 2,018,691 1,968,691 2,018,691 –19,500 1,999,191 

Contract Delay ............................................................................. [–200,000 ] MK–12 IFF pricing ....................................................................... [–1,000 ] 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [150,000 ] RAM logistics pricing .................................................................. [–5,500 ] SLQ–32(V)2 pricing ..................................................................... [–5,000 ] SPQ–9B radar pricing ................................................................. [–1,000 ] SPS–48 radar pricing .................................................................. [–2,000 ] SSDS support pricing .................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

017 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ................................................................... 1 185,106 1 185,106 1 185,106 187,226 1 372,332 

Transfer from OP,A line 174 per Army and Navy Memorandum 

of Agreement.

[187,226 ] 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

018 OCEANOGRAPHIC SHIPS ........................................................................ 1 89,000 1 89,000 1 89,000 1 89,000 

019 MOORED TRAINING SHIP ....................................................................... 155,200 155,200 155,200 –24,000 131,200 

Excess advance procurement ...................................................... [–24,000 ] 

020 OUTFITTING ........................................................................................... 292,871 292,871 292,871 –22,232 270,639 

CVN–71 outfitting phasing ......................................................... [–5,000 ] DDG–1001 and 1002 outfitting phasing .................................... [–1,750 ] LCS–5 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–2,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
813 

LCS–6 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–2,000 ] LCS–7 outfitting phasing ............................................................ [–782 ] SSN–782 post delivery phasing .................................................. [–4,700 ] SSN–785 outfitting phasing ....................................................... [–6,000 ] 

021 SERVICE CRAFT .................................................................................... 3,863 3,863 3,863 3,863 022 LCAC SLEP ............................................................................................ 4 84,076 4 84,076 4 84,076 4 84,076 023 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS ................................... 73,992 73,992 73,992 73,992 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ......................... 14 14,928,921 14 14,878,921 14 14,928,921 –9,807 14 14,919,114 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 64,766 64,766 63,666 –1,100 63,666 

BLU–109 cost growth .................................................................. [–1,100 ] [–1,100 ] 

003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 38,264 38,264 37,264 –15,000 23,264 

MK–182 warhead exceeds production rate ................................. [–3,500 ] 

MK–66 rocket motor cost growth ................................................ [–10,500 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] 

004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 17,788 17,788 17,788 17,788 005 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 35,289 35,289 35,289 35,289 006 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ........................................... 49,416 49,416 49,416 –2,700 46,716 

Initiator and Impulse cartridge unit cost growth ....................... [–2,700 ] 

007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 60,677 60,677 60,677 60,677 008 JATOS .................................................................................................... 2,766 2,766 2,766 2,766 009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................... 19,006 19,006 10,901 –8,105 10,901 

Excess prior year multi-option fuze support funding ................. [–7,105 ] [–7,105 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] 

010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ......................................... 19,320 19,320 1,112 –18,208 1,112 

MK295 cartridge contract delay .................................................. [–18,208 ] [–18,208 ] 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 21,938 21,938 19,018 –2,920 19,018 

Production engineering growth ................................................... [–2,920 ] [–2,920 ] 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 51,819 51,819 46,039 –5,780 46,039 

A131 complete rounds cost growth ............................................ [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] A576 LAP kit cost growth ........................................................... [–2,080 ] [–2,080 ] Production engineering growth ................................................... [–1,200 ] [–1,200 ] 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 10,199 10,199 10,199 10,199 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 4,107 4,107 4,107 4,107 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 58,812 58,812 58,812 58,812 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 21,434 21,434 17,660 –3,774 17,660 

M913 LAP kit contract delay ....................................................... [–3,774 ] [–3,774 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
814 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 84,864 84,864 72,864 –4,200 80,664 

B542 LAP kit cost growth ........................................................... [–12,000 ] [–4,200 ] 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 937 937 937 937 019 81MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 26,324 26,324 18,100 –8,224 18,100 

M913 LAP kit contract delay ....................................................... [–8,224 ] [–8,224 ] 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 9,387 9,387 7,387 9,387 

Program execution - USMC offered reduction ............................ [–2,000 ] 

021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 3,889 3,889 3,889 3,889 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 13,452 13,452 13,452 13,452 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 15,556 15,556 15,556 –3,093 12,463 

C995 late contract award ........................................................... [–3,093 ] 

024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 42,526 42,526 42,526 –20,000 22,526 

TNT flake cost growth ................................................................. [–20,000 ] 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 22,786 22,786 1,786 22,786 

Program execution - USMC offered reduction ............................ [–21,000 ] 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 9,266 9,266 9,266 9,266 027 NON LETHALS ........................................................................................ 2,927 2,927 2,927 2,927 028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ........................................................................ 8,557 8,557 8,557 8,557 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 719,952 719,952 635,841 –93,104 626,848 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE ........................................................................ 13,794 13,794 13,794 13,794 002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ................................................................ 8,643 8,643 8,643 8,643 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

003 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 22,982 22,982 22,982 –2,400 20,582 

ECDIS-N installation funding carryover ...................................... [–1,000 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–1,400 ] 

PERISCOPES 

004 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP .................................................... 60,860 60,860 60,860 –3,827 57,033 

ISIS capability insertion procurement ahead of need ................ [–3,827 ] 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
815 

005 DDG MOD .............................................................................................. 119,522 119,522 119,522 –2,000 117,522 

Engineering services carryover .................................................... [–2,000 ] 

006 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 17,637 17,637 17,637 17,637 007 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD ............................................ 3,049 3,049 3,049 3,049 008 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 22,266 22,266 22,266 22,266 009 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 15,892 15,892 15,892 –1,770 14,122 

SSTG governor procurement ahead of need ............................... [–1,770 ] 

010 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 100,693 100,693 100,693 –7,206 93,487 

ISEA labs growth ......................................................................... [–2,100 ] 

SCS modernization backfit funding ahead of need ................... [–2,106 ] Technology insertion/technology refresh growth ......................... [–3,000 ] 

011 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ........................................................................ 42,296 42,296 42,296 42,296 012 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 25,228 25,228 25,228 25,228 013 DEEP SUBMERGENCE SYSTEMS ........................................................... 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 014 CG MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 590,349 590,349 585,349 –17,000 573,349 

Engineering services carryover .................................................... [–6,000 ] Shore Site Upgrades--Excessive Growth ..................................... [–5,000 ] [–11,000 ] 

016 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS ............................................................ 18,499 18,499 18,499 –1,000 17,499 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–1,000 ] 

017 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 113,809 113,809 99,470 –20,408 93,401 

AS–39 modernization traveling crane funding previously appropriated. [–3,369 ] Auto Voltage Regulators--Ahead of Need ................................... [–3,480 ] [–3,480 ] LCS Waterjet Impellers--No Longer Required ............................. [–10,859 ] [–10,859 ] Machalts growth .......................................................................... [–2,700 ] 

018 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ......................................................... 5,508 5,508 5,508 5,508 019 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................................... 13,397 13,397 13,397 13,397 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

020 REACTOR POWER UNITS ....................................................................... 436,838 436,838 436,838 436,838 021 REACTOR COMPONENTS ....................................................................... 271,600 271,600 271,600 271,600 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

022 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 11,244 11,244 11,244 –1,600 9,644 

Outfitting equipment package cost growth ................................ [–1,600 ] 

SMALL BOATS 

023 STANDARD BOATS ................................................................................. 39,793 39,793 39,793 –6,140 33,653 

7M RIB contract delay ................................................................ [–4,140 ] Medium sized force protection boats cost growth ..................... [–2,000 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

024 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT .................................................... 29,913 29,913 29,913 29,913 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
816 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

025 OPERATING FORCES IPE ....................................................................... 54,642 54,642 54,642 54,642 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

026 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS ........................................................................ 144,175 144,175 144,175 144,175 027 LCS MODULES ....................................................................................... 79,583 79,583 68,163 –16,135 63,448 

AN/AQS–20A--Contract Delay ...................................................... [–8,920 ] [–8,920 ] Engineering change proposal growth ......................................... [–4,715 ] Production Support--Excess to Need ........................................... [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

028 LSD MIDLIFE ......................................................................................... 143,483 143,483 143,483 –10,750 132,733 

Air conditioner plant upgrades installation ahead of need ....... [–2,000 ] 

RO desalinater units installation funding ahead of need ......... [–6,750 ] Steering control upgrade installation funding ahead of need ... [–2,000 ] 

SHIP RADARS 

029 RADAR SUPPORT ................................................................................... 18,818 23,818 18,818 –8,200 10,618 

Excess ECO funding .................................................................... [–1,800 ] Program Increase ........................................................................ [5,000 ] Radar procurement ahead of need ............................................. [–6,400 ] 

SHIP SONARS 

030 SPQ–9B RADAR .................................................................................... 24,613 24,613 24,613 –6,377 18,236 

Radar procurement ahead of need ............................................. [–6,377 ] 

031 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ............................................ 73,829 73,829 73,829 –2,058 71,771 

Sonar upgrade cost growth ......................................................... [–2,058 ] 

032 SSN ACOUSTICS .................................................................................... 212,913 212,913 212,913 212,913 033 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................ 29,686 29,686 29,686 –4,000 25,686 

Mission integration installation funding ahead of need ............ [–4,000 ] 

034 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................................ 13,537 13,537 13,537 13,537 035 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ............................................................ 18,141 18,141 18,141 –1,300 16,841 

ICADS cost growth ....................................................................... [–1,300 ] 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

036 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ........................................... 20,554 20,554 20,554 20,554 037 SSTD ..................................................................................................... 2,257 2,257 2,257 –1,000 1,257 

Excess support funding ............................................................... [–1,000 ] 

038 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ............................................................. 60,141 60,141 60,141 60,141 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
817 

039 SURTASS ............................................................................................... 29,247 29,247 27,047 –3,700 25,547 

ICP installation funding ahead of need ..................................... [–1,500 ] Integrated Common Processor [ICP] Procurement--Ahead of 

Need.

[–2,200 ] [–2,200 ] 

040 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNAISANCE FORCE ................................ 13,453 13,453 13,453 13,453 

040A UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................... 9,600 0 

Anti-Submarine Warfare Electronic Equipment .......................... [9,600 ] 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

041 AN/SLQ–32 ............................................................................................ 43,096 43,096 39,902 –3,194 39,902 

Block 1B3 Units--No Longer Required ........................................ [–3,194 ] [–3,194 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

042 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ........................................................................ 103,645 103,645 100,745 –2,900 100,745 

Paragon Systems--Change to Procurement Strategy .................. [–2,900 ] [–2,900 ] 

043 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ......................................... 1,364 1,364 1,364 1,364 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG ............................................. 100,793 100,793 100,793 –11,552 89,241 

ICADF antenna installation delay ............................................... [–7,286 ] 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–2,000 ] Tech and capability insertion procurement ahead of need ....... [–2,266 ] 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

045 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................................. 23,332 23,332 17,032 –4,000 19,332 

PAAA Backfit Installation Funding--No Longer Required ........... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] Signal Data Processors Backfits [AN/USG–2A]--Ahead of Need [–2,300 ] Signal Data Processors Backfits--Ahead of Need ...................... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

046 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) ................................................. 426 426 426 426 047 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) ..................... 33,017 33,017 33,017 33,017 048 ATDLS .................................................................................................... 942 942 942 942 049 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................................ 7,896 7,896 7,896 7,896 050 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ............................................... 27,868 27,868 27,868 27,868 051 SHALLOW WATER MCM ......................................................................... 1,048 9,023 1,048 1,048 

Shallow Water Mine Counter Measures ...................................... [7,975 ] 

052 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ...................................................... 9,926 9,926 9,926 9,926 053 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ....................................... 4,370 4,370 4,370 4,370 054 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 4,143 4,143 4,143 4,143 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

055 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 45,989 45,989 45,989 –10,800 35,189 

COTS obsolescence excessive growth ......................................... [–10,800 ] 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

056 MATCALS ............................................................................................... 8,136 8,136 8,136 5,232 13,368 

Radar upgrade transfer from Title XV ........................................ [7,232 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
818 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–2,000 ] 

057 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ...................................................... 7,394 7,394 7,394 7,394 058 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ............................................... 18,518 18,518 18,518 –1,500 17,018 

ECO growth .................................................................................. [–1,500 ] 

059 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM .............................................................. 26,054 26,054 26,054 –1,473 24,581 

Digital Airport Surveillance Radar cost growth .......................... [–1,473 ] 

060 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................... 7,213 7,213 7,213 7,213 061 LANDING SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 062 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 33,170 33,170 31,470 –1,700 31,470 

Mark XII Mode 5–-Ahead of Need ............................................... [–1,700 ] [–1,700 ] 

063 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ................................................... 8,941 8,941 8,941 8,941 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT ........................................... 8,994 8,994 8,994 8,994 065 MARITIME INTERGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM .................................... 13,529 13,529 13,529 13,529 066 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS ........................................................... 12,776 12,776 10,876 –1,900 10,876 

Tactical/Mobile C4I Systems Increment 2.1 Ahead of Need ...... [–1,900 ] [–1,900 ] 

067 DCGS-N ................................................................................................. 11,201 11,201 11,201 11,201 068 CANES ................................................................................................... 195,141 195,141 105,541 –99,053 96,088 

Installation ahead of need .......................................................... [–7,153 ] Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–2,300 ] Transfer to PE 33138N (RDN 201) per USN request .................. [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] Transfer to Ship Communications Automation (OPN 76) per 

USN request.

[–77,600 ] [–77,600 ] 

069 RADIAC .................................................................................................. 6,201 6,201 6,201 6,201 070 CANES-INTELL ....................................................................................... 75,084 75,084 75,084 –2,771 72,313 

Installation ahead of need .......................................................... [–2,771 ] 

071 ELECTRONIC TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 6,010 6,010 6,010 6,010 072 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ............................................... 4,441 4,441 4,441 4,441 073 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................ 4,741 4,741 4,741 4,741 074 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 51,716 51,716 51,716 –9,300 42,416 

SPS–48 radar cost growth .......................................................... [–2,500 ] 

SPS–48 radar upgrade procurement ahead of need .................. [–6,800 ] 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
819 

075 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS ............................................ 26,197 2,397 1,494 –24,703 1,494 

Airborne Maritime - Fixed Radios ............................................... [–8,800 ] JTRS AMF--Program Delay ........................................................... [–24,703 ] [–24,703 ] Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

076 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION .................................................. 177,510 177,510 255,110 77,600 255,110 

Transfer from CANES (OPN 68) per USN request ....................... [77,600 ] [77,600 ] 

077 MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESS (MDA) ................................................ 24,022 24,022 24,022 24,022 078 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M ................................................. 33,644 33,644 27,544 –6,100 27,544 

BFTN--Installations Ahead of Need ............................................. [–2,800 ] [–2,800 ] HMS Radios--Contract Delays ..................................................... [–3,300 ] [–3,300 ] 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

079 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT ...................................................... 10,357 10,357 10,357 10,357 080 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................................... 75,447 75,447 75,447 –1,400 74,047 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–1,400 ] 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

081 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ............................................... 25,522 25,522 25,522 25,522 082 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ..................................................... 109,022 109,022 94,022 –1,780 107,242 

Revised Pricing ............................................................................ [–15,000 ] Submarine terminal cost growth ................................................ [–1,780 ] 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

083 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 2,186 2,186 2,186 2,186 084 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................. 1,329 1,329 1,329 1,329 085 NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................... 2,418 2,418 2,418 2,418 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

086 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......................................... 119,857 119,857 114,257 –10,463 109,394 

EKMS Afloat--KMI Ahead of Need ............................................... [–1,000 ] [–2,074 ] Excess installation funding ......................................................... [–3,789 ] VACM Program Delay ................................................................... [–4,600 ] [–4,600 ] 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

087 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .............................................. 14,820 14,820 14,820 14,820 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

088 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 6,848 6,848 6,848 6,848 

DRUG INTERDICTION SUPPORT 

089 OTHER DRUG INTERDICTION SUPPORT ................................................. 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,290 

SONOBUOYS 

090 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 96,314 96,314 84,464 –1,500 94,814 

AN/SSQ–110 cost growth ............................................................ [–1,500 ] AN/SSQ–125–-Ahead of Need ..................................................... [–11,850 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

091 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 40,697 40,697 40,697 –3,000 37,697 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
820 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Threat presentation program growth .......................................... [–3,000 ] 

092 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ................................................................... 8,561 8,561 8,561 8,561 093 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 8,941 8,941 8,941 –3,354 5,587 

Munitions trailer contract delay .................................................. [–2,354 ] 

Ordnance trailer contract delay .................................................. [–1,000 ] 

094 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ...................................... 19,777 19,777 19,777 19,777 095 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 22,003 22,003 22,003 –2,525 19,478 

Meteorological Mobile Facility (Replacement) Next Generation 

contract delay.

[–2,525 ] 

096 DIGITAL CAMERA RECEIVING STATION .................................................. 1,595 1,595 1,595 1,595 097 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ....................................................................... 66,031 66,031 66,031 –5,112 60,919 

Flight deck cranial cost growth .................................................. [–5,112 ] 

098 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................................. 49,668 49,668 42,765 –16,153 33,515 

AN/AQS–20A--Contract Delay ...................................................... [–6,903 ] [–6,903 ] 

Production line set up excess funding ....................................... [–9,250 ] 

099 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................................. 18,471 18,471 18,471 –5,563 12,908 

Modification kit procurement ahead of need ............................. [–5,563 ] 

100 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ....................................... 7,875 7,875 7,875 7,875 101 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 12,553 12,553 12,553 12,553 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

102 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ........................................................... 2,049 2,049 2,049 2,049 103 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 4,488 4,488 4,488 4,488 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

104 NATO SEASPARROW .............................................................................. 8,926 8,926 8,926 8,926 105 RAM GMLS ............................................................................................ 4,321 4,321 4,321 –1,193 3,128 

Installation funding ahead of need ............................................ [–1,193 ] 

106 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ............................................................... 60,700 60,700 54,381 –6,376 54,324 

SSDS COTS Conversion Kits Ahead of Need ............................... [–6,319 ] [–6,376 ] 

107 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................................ 43,148 43,148 43,148 43,148 108 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 72,861 72,861 72,861 –2,600 70,261 

Support funding carryover ........................................................... [–2,600 ] 

109 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ................................................................ 732 732 732 732 110 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS ................................ 4,823 4,823 4,823 4,823 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
821 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

111 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ................................................... 187,807 187,807 187,807 187,807 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

112 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 81,596 81,596 81,596 7,500 89,096 

Naval Intelligence Fusion Tool transfer from Title XV ................ [7,500 ] 

113 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 5,241 5,241 5,241 5,241 114 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 5,816 5,816 5,816 5,816 115 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 7,842 7,842 7,842 7,842 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

116 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............................................. 98,847 98,847 98,847 –1,900 96,947 

Product improvement funding growth ........................................ [–1,900 ] 

117 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 4,073 4,073 4,073 4,073 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

118 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM ..................................................... 32,716 32,716 32,716 32,716 119 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ....................................................... 5,814 5,814 5,814 5,814 120 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ................................................... 36,777 36,777 36,777 36,777 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 6,271 6,271 3,771 –1,500 4,771 

Non-SOCOM related contract delays ........................................... [–1,500 ] 

Unjustified Growth ....................................................................... [–2,500 ] 

122 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ................................................................. 3,202 3,202 2,202 3,202 

Unjustified Growth ....................................................................... [–1,000 ] 

123 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............................................. 9,850 9,850 6,850 9,850 

Contract Delays ........................................................................... [–3,000 ] 

124 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 14,315 14,315 14,315 14,315 125 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 16,502 16,502 16,502 16,502 126 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ...................................................................... 3,235 3,235 3,235 3,235 127 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 7,175 7,175 7,175 7,175 128 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .................................................................... 20,727 20,727 10,727 –10,000 10,727 

Contract Delays ........................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

129 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ............................................................ 1,142 1,142 1,142 1,142 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

130 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,972 14,972 9,972 –5,000 9,972 

Contract Delays ........................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

131 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................. 4,453 4,453 4,453 4,453 132 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 6,416 6,416 6,416 6,416 133 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS (IT) ............................................ 51,894 51,894 51,894 51,894 

TRAINING DEVICES 

134 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 16,353 16,353 16,353 16,353 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
822 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

135 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 28,693 28,693 27,693 –2,372 26,321 

SPAWAR--Excess to Need ............................................................ [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] US Fleet Forces equipment growth ............................................. [–1,372 ] 

136 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 2,197 2,197 2,197 2,197 137 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 7,175 7,175 4,175 –3,000 4,175 

Medical and dental outfitting kit cost growth ........................... [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

138 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 1,457 1,457 1,457 1,457 140 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 15,330 15,330 15,330 15,330 141 C4ISR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 136 136 136 136 142 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 18,639 18,639 18,639 18,639 143 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 177,240 177,240 177,240 177,240 144 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 143,022 143,022 143,022 143,022 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

148A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 14,402 14,402 14,402 14,402 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

149 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 208,384 208,384 208,384 208,384 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 6,285,451 6,284,226 6,122,523 –292,276 5,993,175 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................... 9,894 9,894 9,894 9,894 

002 LAV PIP ................................................................................................. 147,051 147,051 147,051 147,051 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................. 7 11,961 7 11,961 7 11,961 7 11,961 004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................................. 5,552 5,552 5,552 5,552 005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ....................................... 14,695 14,695 14,695 14,695 006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION ...................... 14,868 14,868 14,868 14,868 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 53,932 53,932 53,932 53,932

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .................................................... 13,795 13,795 13,795 13,795 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ............................................................. 12,287 12,287 12,287 12,287 011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW .......................................................................... 46,563 46,563 46,563 46,563 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
823 

012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) .............................. 19,606 19,606 19,606 19,606 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 4,140 4,140 4,140 4,140 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ................................................................... 16,755 16,755 16,755 16,755 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 24,071 24,071 24,071 24,071 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .................................................................. 25,461 25,461 25,461 25,461 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 5,926 5,926 5,926 5,926 019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ............................................................. 44,152 44,152 44,152 44,152 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 40,352 40,352 40,352 40,352

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

021 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................................................ 8,793 8,793 4,470 –4,323 4,470 

Excess to need ............................................................................ [–4,323 ] [–4,323 ] 

022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 64,276 64,276 32,276 64,276 

Marine Corps recommendation ................................................... [–32,000 ] 

024 RQ–11 UAV ........................................................................................... 2,104 2,104 2,104 2,104025 DCGS-MC .............................................................................................. 10,789 10,789 10,789 10,789 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 6,847 6,847 6,847 6,847 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 218,869 218,869 196,869 218,869 

Marine Corps recommendation ................................................... [–22,000 ] 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 84,856 84,856 84,856 84,856 031 RADIO SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 89,479 90,479 79,770 –9,709 79,770 

Equipment upgrade for CBNIRF (UFR) ........................................ [1,000 ] [1,000 ] [1,000 ] Marine Corps recommendation ................................................... [–10,709 ] [–10,709 ] 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................ 16,598 16,598 16,598 16,598 033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................................ 47,505 47,505 47,505 47,505 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 1,606 1,606 1,606 1,606 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ................................................... 894 894 894 894 035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ........................................................... 14,231 14,231 14,231 14,231 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .................................................... 8,389 8,389 8,389 8,389 038 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ......................................... 12 5,833 12 5,833 12 5,833 12 5,833 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
824 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

039 LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP ......................................................... 972 972 972 972 040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ............................................................ 21,848 21,848 21,848 21,848 

OTHER SUPPORT 

042 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 4,503 4,503 4,503 4,503 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

043 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 2,599 2,599 2,599 2,599 044 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 16,255 16,255 16,255 16,255 045 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 26,853 26,853 26,853 26,853 046 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 27,247 27,247 27,247 27,247 047 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 5,533 5,533 5,533 5,533 048 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 61,753 61,753 29,753 61,753 

Marine Corps recommendation ................................................... [–32,000 ] 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

049 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 16,627 16,627 16,627 16,627 050 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ............................. 10,827 10,827 10,827 10,827 051 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ................................................................. 37,055 37,055 37,055 37,055 052 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 1,462 1,462 1,462 1,462 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

053 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 24,079 24,079 24,079 24,079 054 TRAINING DEVICES ................................................................................ 10,277 10,277 10,277 10,277

055 CONTAINER FAMILY ............................................................................... 3,123 3,123 3,123 3,123 056 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 18,137 18,137 18,137 18,137 059 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN ............................................................... 5,026 5,026 5,026 5,026 

OTHER SUPPORT 

060 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 90 90 90 90 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 19 1,391,602 19 1,392,602 19 1,291,570 –14,032 19 1,377,570 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 19 3,340,615 19 3,340,615 19 3,340,615 –1 –151,000 18 3,189,615 

Reduce by one aircraft ................................................................ [–1 ] [–151,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
825 

002 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 323,477 323,477 323,477 –94,500 228,977 

Reduce advance procurement ..................................................... [–94,500 ] 

003 F–22A ................................................................................................... 104,118 104,118 104,118 104,118 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J .................................................................................................. 1 72,879 1 72,879 1 72,879 1 72,879 

007 HC–130J ............................................................................................... 3 332,899 3 332,899 3 332,899 3 332,899 009 MC–130J ............................................................................................... 6 582,466 6 582,466 6 582,466 6 582,466 013 C–27J .................................................................................................... 9 479,896 9 479,896 9 479,896 9 479,896 

UPT TRAINERS 

015 USAFA POWERED FLIGHT PROGRAM ..................................................... 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 

HELICOPTERS 

017 COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT ....................................................... 2 52,800 2 52,800 2 52,800 2 52,800 019 V22 OSPREY ......................................................................................... 5 339,865 5 339,865 5 339,865 5 339,865 

020 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

023 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C .......................................................................... 2,190 2,190 2,190 2,190 024 HH–60M ................................................................................................ 3 104,711 1 34,811 3 34,811 3 104,711 

Combat losses funded in FY11 ................................................... [–2 ] [–69,900 ] [–69,900 ] 

025 LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECON ACFT ..................................................... 9 158,549 9 158,549 9 –3 –43,500 6 115,049 

Defer production pending R&D completion ................................ [–158,549 ] Reduction of three aircraft ......................................................... [–3 ] [–43,500 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

029 TARGET DRONES ................................................................................... 64,268 64,268 64,268 –5,000 59,268 

Slow execution ............................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

030 C–37A ................................................................................................... 3 77,842 3 77,842 3 77,842 3 77,842 031 RQ–4 ..................................................................................................... 3 323,964 3 323,964 3 323,964 3 323,964 032 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 71,500 71,500 71,500 71,500 033 MC 130 ................................................................................................. 1 108,470 1 108,470 1 108,470 1 108,470 034 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 48 813,092 48 813,092 48 –813,092 48 0 

ASIP 2C early to need ................................................................. [–29,500 ] [–29,500 ] Block 5 to Block 1 adjustment ................................................... [–64,000 ] Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–783,592 ] [–719,592 ] 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

035 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 41,315 41,315 41,315 –10,300 31,015 

Excess to need ............................................................................ [–10,300 ] 

036 B–1B ..................................................................................................... 198,007 198,007 198,007 198,007 037 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 93,897 93,897 93,897 93,897 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

038 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 153,128 158,128 7,328 –140,600 12,528 

Modification of In Service A–10 Aircraft .................................... [5,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
826 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Program reduction--Wing replacement program ........................ [–145,800 ] [–140,600 ] 

039 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 222,386 222,386 208,386 –14,000 208,386 

Early to need--Mode 5 IFF .......................................................... [–14,000 ] [–14,000 ] 

040 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 73,346 56,746 56,746 –16,600 56,746 

Mode 5 procurement ahead of need ........................................... [–16,600 ] [–16,600 ] [–16,600 ] 

041 F–22A ................................................................................................... 232,032 232,032 232,032 232,032 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

043 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 11,741 5,741 11,741 11,741 

Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–6,000 ] 

045 C–5M .................................................................................................... 851,859 851,859 851,859 851,859 

046 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 112,200 112,200 112,200 112,200 047 C–9C ..................................................................................................... 9 9 9 9 048 C–17A ................................................................................................... 202,179 196,179 202,179 202,179 

Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–6,000 ] 

049 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 328 328 328 328 050 C–32A ................................................................................................... 12,157 12,157 1,757 –10,400 1,757 

Program reduction--SLC3S--A ..................................................... [–10,400 ] [–10,400 ] 

051 C–37A ................................................................................................... 21,986 21,986 486 –21,500 486 

Program reduction--SLC3S--A ..................................................... [–21,500 ] [–21,500 ] 

052 C–130 AMP ........................................................................................... 235,635 235,635 208,135 –27,500 208,135 

Early to need--kit installs ........................................................... [–27,500 ] [–27,500 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

053 GLIDER MODS ....................................................................................... 123 123 123 123 054 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 15,086 15,086 15,086 15,086 

055 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 238 238 238 238 056 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 31,032 31,032 31,032 31,032 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

057 KC–10A (ATCA) ..................................................................................... 27,220 27,220 9,820 –17,400 9,820 

Early to need--CNS/ATM .............................................................. [–17,400 ] [–17,400 ] 

058 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,777 1,777 1,777 1,777 

059 MC–12W ............................................................................................... 16,767 16,767 16,767 16,767 060 C–20 MODS .......................................................................................... 241 241 241 241 061 VC–25A MOD ........................................................................................ 387 387 387 387 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
827 

062 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 206 206 206 206 063 C–130 ................................................................................................... 45,876 43,276 45,876 10,400 56,276 

Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–13,000 ] Transfer per Air Force Request from RDAF–81 .......................... [10,400 ] [10,400 ] 

064 C–130 INTEL ......................................................................................... 3,593 3,593 3,593 3,593

065 C–130J MODS ....................................................................................... 38,174 38,174 38,174 38,174 066 C–135 ................................................................................................... 62,210 62,210 62,210 62,210 067 COMPASS CALL MODS .......................................................................... 256,624 256,624 256,624 256,624 068 RC–135 ................................................................................................. 162,211 162,211 162,211 162,211 069 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 135,031 135,031 135,031 135,031 070 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 57,829 57,829 57,829 57,829 071 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 29,058 29,058 29,058 29,058 072 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 073 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 34,371 88,971 88,971 34,371 

Transfer from PE 65299F (RDAF 81) per USAF request ............. [54,600 ] [54,600 ] 

074 RQ–4 MODS .......................................................................................... 89,177 89,177 89,177 89,177 

075 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 431 431 10,831 10,400 10,831 

Transfer from PE 65299F (RDAF 81) per USAF request ............. [10,400 ] [10,400 ] 

076 OTHER MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 115,338 115,338 68,238 –47,100 68,238 

Early to need in FAB-T ................................................................ [–47,100 ] [–47,100 ] 

077 MQ–1 MODS ......................................................................................... 158,446 158,446 158,446 158,446 

078 MQ–9 MODS ......................................................................................... 181,302 181,302 181,302 –31,558 149,744 

Block 5 fielding early to need .................................................... [–31,558 ] 

079 MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS ........................................................................... 74,866 74,866 74,866 74,866 080 CV–22 MODS ........................................................................................ 14,715 14,715 14,715 14,715 

AIRCRAFT SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

081 FIGHTER/UAV INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ...................................... 1,030,364 1,030,364 927,364 –103,000 927,364 

Program reduction--poor execution ............................................. [–103,000 ] [–103,000 ] 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

082 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................................... 92,394 92,394 92,394 –2,076 90,318 

F–15 ESTS contract delay ........................................................... [–2,076 ] 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

083 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 4,743 4,743 4,743 4,743 

084 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 101 101 101 101 085 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 49,319 49,319 49,319 49,319 087 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 521 521 521 521 089 KC–10A (ATCA) ..................................................................................... 5,691 5,691 5,691 5,691 090 C–17A ................................................................................................... 183,696 183,696 75,115 –108,581 75,115 

Transition to post production ...................................................... [–108,581 ] [–108,581 ] 

091 C–130 ................................................................................................... 25,646 25,646 25,646 25,646 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
828 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

093 C–135 ................................................................................................... 2,434 2,434 2,434 2,434 094 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,076 2,076 2,076 2,076 095 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 4,537 4,537 4,537 4,537 097 OTHER AIRCRAFT .................................................................................. 40,025 40,025 40,025 –16,800 23,225 

F–16 Block 40/50 MTC ............................................................... [–16,800 ] 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

098 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS ............................................................. 21,050 21,050 21,050 21,050 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

099 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 87,220 87,220 –87,220 0 

Transfer to OCO ........................................................................... [–87,220 ] [–87,220 ] 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

100 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 1,072,858 1,072,858 1,072,858 1,072,858

DARP 

104 U–2 ....................................................................................................... 48,875 48,875 48,875 48,875 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

104A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 16,502 16,502 16,502 16,502 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

105 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................... 85,000 0 

Mobility Aircraft ........................................................................... [60,000 ] Mobility Aircraft Simulators ........................................................ [25,000 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 112 14,082,527 110 14,126,027 112 12,506,885 –4 –1,740,927 108 12,341,600 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 23,919 23,919 23,919 23,919 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 89,771 89,771 89,771 89,771 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 38,756 38,756 38,756 –4,880 33,876 

BDU–56 C/B—Unjustified cost growth ...................................... [–4,880 ] 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 168,557 168,557 168,557 –35,000 133,557 

BDU–109—Incorrect cost estimate ............................................ [–35,000 ] 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 3,250 76,649 3,250 76,649 3,250 76,649 3,250 76,649 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
829 

FLARE, IR MJU–7B 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................... 42,410 42,410 42,410 42,410 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............................................. 3,119 3,119 3,119 3,119 008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 998 998 998 998 009 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................................... 1,132 1,132 1,132 1,132 010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 ............................................................. 5,075 5,075 5,075 5,075 

FUZES 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 46,749 46,749 46,749 46,749 012 FUZES ................................................................................................... 34,735 34,735 34,735 34,735 

SMALL ARMS 

013 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 7,195 7,195 7,195 7,195 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 3,250 539,065 3,250 539,065 3,250 539,065 –39,880 3,250 499,185 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT - BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................................. 67,745 67,745 67,745 67,745 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................... 142 236,193 142 236,193 142 236,193 142 236,193 

003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) .......................................................................... 240 88,769 240 88,769 240 88,769 240 88,769 004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 218 309,561 218 309,561 218 208,561 –107,385 218 202,176 

Production Backlog ...................................................................... [–101,000 ] [–107,385 ] 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 416 46,830 416 46,830 416 46,830 416 46,830 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 7,523 7,523 7,523 7,523 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION .......................................... 726 726 726 726 

CLASS IV 

008 ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILE ................................................................. 39 39 39 39 009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 125,953 125,953 125,953 125,953 010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ............................................................................ 266 266 266 266 011 AGM–88A HARM ................................................................................... 25,642 25,642 25,642 25,642 012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) .................................................. 14,987 14,987 14,987 14,987 

MISSILE SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

013 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................. 43,241 43,241 43,241 43,241 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

014 ADVANCED EHF ..................................................................................... 2 552,833 2 552,833 2 552,833 2 552,833 016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................................... 1 468,745 1 884,745 1 468,745 407,000 1 875,745 

Reduction to Support Funding Growth ........................................ [–9,000 ] Transfer from PDW–20 ................................................................ [416,000 ] [416,000 ] 

018 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ...................................................................... 2 433,526 2 433,526 2 433,526 2 433,526 

019 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 81,811 81,811 41,811 81,811 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
830 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Excess advance procurement—AF program change .................. [–40,000 ] 

020 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) ............................................................ 21,568 21,568 21,568 21,568 021 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ............................................................. 67,689 67,689 67,689 67,689 022 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ........................................... 101,397 101,397 101,397 101,397 023 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................................... 4 1,740,222 4 1,740,222 4 1,740,222 –32,000 4 1,708,222 

Excess to need due to efficiencies ............................................. [–32,000 ] 

024 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) .............................................................................. 81,389 81,389 81,389 81,389 025 Advance Procurement (CY) .............................................................. 243,500 243,500 243,500 243,500 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

031 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ............................................................... 154,727 154,727 154,727 154,727 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

031A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 1,159,135 1,159,135 746,980 –412,155 746,980 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [–412,155 ] [–412,155 ] 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 1,025 6,074,017 1,025 6,490,017 1,025 5,520,862 –144,540 1,025 5,929,477 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 5,621 5,621 5,621 5,621 

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ................................................................. 18,411 18,411 18,411 18,411 003 CAP VEHICLES ...................................................................................... 917 917 917 917 004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (CARGO ................................................ 18,694 18,694 18,694 18,694 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 5,982 85 –5,897 85 

Guardian Angel Contract Delay ................................................... [–2,941 ] [–2,941 ] HMMWV--In Excess of Need ........................................................ [–5,982 ] [–2,956 ] [–2,956 ] 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SPECIA ............................................... 20,677 20,677 20,677 20,677 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................................... 22,881 22,881 22,881 22,881 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 .............................................................. 14,978 14,978 14,978 14,978 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU ....................................... 16,556 16,556 16,556 16,556 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
831 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M BASE MAINT/CONST ........................................ 30,225 30,225 30,225 30,225 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

011 COMSEC EQUIPMENT ............................................................................ 135,169 135,169 135,169 135,169012 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) ................................................................... 1,263 1,263 1,263 1,263 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 2,645 2,645 2,645 2,645 015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 21,762 21,762 21,762 21,762 016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ..................................................................... 899 899 899 899 017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ............................................................... 18,529 18,529 18,529 18,529 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS ............................................... 32,473 32,473 32,473 32,473 019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM ............................................................... 51,426 51,426 51,426 51,426 020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM - FIXED ...................................................... 32,468 32,468 32,468 32,468 021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN .......................................... 22,813 22,813 22,813 22,813 022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 14,619 14,619 14,619 14,619 023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................. 39,144 39,144 39,144 –1,000 38,144 

JFHQ equipment ........................................................................... [–1,000 ] 

024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX .......................................................... 25,992 25,992 25,992 25,992 025 TAC SIGNIT SPT .................................................................................... 217 217 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 52,263 52,263 52,263 52,263 028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .............................................. 16,951 16,951 16,951 16,951 029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................... 26,433 26,433 19,033 –9,400 17,033 

SLICC/Viper II Excess of Need ..................................................... [–7,400 ] [–7,400 ] Wing LAN infrastructure—slow execution .................................. [–2,000 ] 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................................ 90,015 90,015 90,015 90,015 031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .................................................................. 23,955 23,955 23,955 23,955 032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ....................................................................... 7,518 7,518 7,518 7,518 033 GCSS-AF FOS ........................................................................................ 72,641 72,641 72,641 72,641 034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM ...................................................... 22,301 22,301 22,301 22,301 035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ........................................... 15,525 15,525 15,525 15,525 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS .................................................... 49,377 49,377 49,377 49,377 037 BASE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................... 41,239 41,239 41,239 41,239 038 AFNET .................................................................................................... 228,978 228,978 108,978 –100,000 128,978 

Reduce Program Growth .............................................................. [–120,000 ] [–100,000 ] 

039 VOICE SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 43,603 43,603 23,603 –20,000 23,603 

Reduce Program Growth .............................................................. [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

040 USCENTCOM- JCSE ............................................................................... 30,983 30,983 30,983 30,983 

DISA PROGRAMS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
832 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ................................................ 49,570 49,570 49,570 49,570 042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ............................................................................ 2,008 2,008 2,008 2,008 043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE ............................................................. 4,863 4,863 4,863 4,863 044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ........................................... 61,386 61,386 61,386 61,386 045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ....................................................... 125,947 125,947 125,947 125,947 046 MILSATCOM SPACE ............................................................................... 104,720 104,720 36,570 –68,150 36,570 

Early to need in FAB-T ................................................................ [–68,150 ] [–68,150 ] 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ............................................................................. 28,075 28,075 28,075 28,075 048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ...................................................................... 20,718 20,718 20,718 20,718 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 227,866 217,466 153,590 –74,240 153,626 

JTC Training and Rehearsal Schedule Ahead of Need ............... [–17,140 ] [–17,140 ] JTRS AMF Milestone C Delay ....................................................... [–10,400 ] [–12,636 ] [–12,600 ] JTRS Handheld / Manpack Cost Increases ................................. [–44,500 ] [–44,500 ] 

050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER ................................................. 22,184 22,184 7,184 –15,000 7,184 

CSEL Contract Delay ................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 11,408 11,408 11,408 11,408 052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 11,559 11,559 11,559 11,559 053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................ 105,977 105,977 80,977 –25,000 80,977 

Slow Execution ............................................................................. [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ............................................................................. 76,810 76,810 76,810 76,810 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES ........................................................................ 20,008 20,008 1,008 –19,000 1,008 

Night Vision Cueing and Display Contract Delay ....................... [–19,000 ] [–19,000 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY) .............................................. 25,499 25,499 12,598 –12,901 12,598 

Laser Eye Protection Contract Delay ........................................... [–5,800 ] [–5,800 ] MACH Early to Need .................................................................... [–7,101 ] [–7,101 ] 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ........................................... 37,829 37,829 37,829 37,829 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .............................................................. 16,483 16,483 16,483 16,483 059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 16,754 16,754 16,754 16,754 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
833 

060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT ................................................... 3,653 3,653 903 –2,750 903 

Unjustified Program Growth ........................................................ [–2,750 ] [–2,750 ] 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 30,345 30,345 20,345 –10,000 20,345 

Power Generation--Reduce Growth .............................................. [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (BASE S) .............................................. 2,819 2,819 2,819 2,819 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ......................................................................................... 23,341 23,341 23,341 23,341 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................... 212,146 212,146 212,146 212,146 067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ................................................................. 410,069 410,069 410,069 410,069 068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 41,066 41,066 41,066 41,066 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 14,618,160 14,618,160 14,788,852 170,692 14,788,852 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [170,692 ] [170,692 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 14,630 14,630 14,630 14,630 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 17,602,036 17,585,654 17,392,354 –192,646 17,409,390 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

002 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,473 1,473 1,473 1,473 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

003 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 2,076 2,076 2,076 2,076 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

004 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 11,019 11,019 11,019 11,019 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

014 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY ....................................................... 19,952 19,952 19,952 19,952 015 GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................... 5,324 5,324 5,324 5,324 016 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .................................................... 2,955 2,955 2,955 2,955 017 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 54,743 54,743 54,743 54,743 018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 174,805 174,805 174,805 174,805 019 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ...................................... 3,429 3,429 3,429 3,429 020 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................................... 500,932 84,932 200,932 –416,000 84,932 

Other alternatives not evaluated; need to conduct AOA ............ [–300,000 ] Transfer to MPAF–16 ................................................................... [–416,000 ] [–416,000 ] 

021 PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................. 1,788 1,788 1,788 1,788 022 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................................ 24,085 24,085 24,085 24,085 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

023 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 11,537 11,537 11,537 11,537 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

024 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5 14,542 5 14,542 5 14,542 5 14,542 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
834 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

025 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ............................ 1,444 1,444 1,444 1,444 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 

026 EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................... 971 971 971 971 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

027 OTHER CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 974 974 974 974 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

028 VEHICLES .............................................................................................. 4 200 4 200 4 200 4 200 

029 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 3 12,806 3 12,806 3 12,806 3 12,806

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DTSA 

030 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 447 447 447 447 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

033 THAAD ................................................................................................... 68 833,150 68 883,150 68 713,150 –124,000 68 709,150 

Excess to production capacity .................................................... [–120,000 ] [–124,000 ] Program Increase ........................................................................ [50,000 ] 

034 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................... 46 565,393 46 615,393 46 250,393 46 565,393 

Production delay; transfer to R&D for fixes ............................... [–315,000 ] Program Increase ........................................................................ [50,000 ] 

035 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS ..................................................................... 2 380,195 2 380,195 2 380,195 2 380,195 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

043 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 5,787 5,787 5,787 5,787 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

045 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ...................................................................... 47,123 47,123 47,123 47,123 046 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ...................................................... 20,176 20,176 20,176 20,176 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

047 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS ........................................................................ 29,729 29,729 29,729 29,729 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

048 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ...................................................................... 31,974 31,974 31,974 31,974 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

048A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 554,408 554,408 554,408 –13,320 541,088 

Classified adjustment ................................................................. [–13,320 ] 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

049 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................................... 41,411 41,411 41,411 41,411 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
835 

051 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 171,456 171,456 171,456 –26,000 145,456 

Maintain fiscal year 2011 production rate due to extended 

modification periods.

[–26,000 ] 

052 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ..................................................................... 15 272,623 15 222,623 15 176,023 –55,000 15 217,623 

AvFID Funding ahead of need ..................................................... [–50,000 ] [–55,000 ] [–45,000 ] AvFID rotary-wing simulator ........................................................ [–10,000 ] NSAV-L Transfer from OCO ......................................................... [8,500 ] NSAV-M Unjustified Requirement ................................................ [–50,100 ] 

054 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 

055 MH–47 CHINOOK .................................................................................. 142,783 142,783 142,783 142,783 056 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .................................................... 486 486 486 486 057 CV–22 MODIFICATION ........................................................................... 27 118,002 27 118,002 27 118,002 27 118,002 058 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 3,025 3,025 3,025 3,025 059 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 3,024 3,024 3,024 3,024 060 RQ–7 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ...................................................... 450 450 450 450 061 STUASL0 ................................................................................................ 12,276 12,276 12,276 12,276 062 AC/MC–130J ......................................................................................... 74,891 74,891 74,891 74,891 063 C–130 MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 19,665 19,665 19,665 19,665 064 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT .............................................................................. 6,207 6,207 6,207 6,207 

SHIPBUILDING 

065 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 6,999 6,999 6,999 6,999 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

067 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ................................................................ 116,009 116,009 116,009 –10,000 106,009 

Prior year funding carryover ........................................................ [–10,000 ] 

068 ORDNANCE ACQUISITION ...................................................................... 28,281 28,281 28,281 –10,000 18,281 

Aviation ammunition—prior year funding carryover .................. [–10,000 ] 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

069 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS ............................. 87,489 150,289 87,489 62,800 150,289 

Program Growth ........................................................................... [62,800 ] [62,800 ] 

070 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 74,702 74,702 85,702 74,702 

VSO/ALP Unfunded Requirement ................................................. [11,000 ] 

071 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 9,196 9,196 13,196 9,196 

VSO/ALP Unfunded Requirement ................................................. [4,000 ] 

072 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS .......................... 15,621 15,621 15,621 15,621 076 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS ............................................................... 6,899 66,899 21,899 60,000 66,899 

HSAC Unfunded Requirement ...................................................... [15,000 ] 

Program Growth ........................................................................... [60,000 ] [60,000 ] 

077 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 594 594 594 594 078 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 33,915 33,915 41,315 33,915 

VSO/ALP Unfunded Requirement ................................................. [7,400 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
836 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

080 MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION SYSTEMS ................................. 46,242 46,242 46,242 46,242 081 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 50,000 50,000 20,000 –30,000 20,000 

Reduction to growth .................................................................... [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

082 MILCON COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 18,723 18,723 18,723 18,723 085 AUTOMATION SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 51,232 51,232 51,232 51,232 086 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ........................................... 7,782 7,782 7,782 7,782 087 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ..................................... 22,960 22,960 22,960 22,960 088 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS .................................. 362 362 2,962 362 

VSO/ALP Unfunded Requirement ................................................. [2,600 ] 

089 VISUAL AUGMENTATION LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS ..................... 15,758 15,758 15,758 15,758 090 TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS ................................................................... 76,459 101,459 76,459 25,000 101,459 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [25,000 ] [25,000 ] 

093 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 1,895 1,895 1,895 1,895 094 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 246,893 246,893 246,893 246,893 095 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ................................... 4,142 4,142 4,142 4,142 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

095A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 4,012 4,012 4,012 4,012 

CBDP 

096 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ...................................................... 15,900 15,900 14,817 15,900 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–1,083 ] 

097 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ...................................................................... 71,376 71,376 70,484 71,376 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–892 ] 

098 DECONTAMINATION ............................................................................... 6,466 6,466 6,208 6,466 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–258 ] 

099 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ........................................... 11,143 11,143 11,019 –7,000 4,143 

Next Generation Diagnostic System ahead of need ................... [–7,000 ] 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–124 ] 

100 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ..................................................................... 9,414 9,414 9,085 9,414 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–329 ] 

101 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE ................................................................ 139,948 139,948 138,322 139,948 

Underexecution ............................................................................ [–1,626 ] 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 170 5,365,248 170 5,147,048 170 4,539,336 –543,520 170 4,821,728 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
837 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 100,000 100,000 –100,000 0 

Unjustified Requirement .............................................................. [–100,000 ] [–100,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 100,000 100,000 –100,000 0 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT UNDISTRIBUTED 

007 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................... 100,000 100,000 100,000 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [100,000 ] [100,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT ................. 100,000 100,000 100,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 123,571 111,453,792 123,551 111,331,833 123,571 101,633,483 –9 –7,874,426 123,562 103,579,366 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

002 C–12 CARGO AIRPLANE ........................................................................ 1 10,500 1 10,500 1 –10,500 1 0 

No justified requirement ............................................................. [–10,500 ] [–10,500 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 658,798 36 550,798 36 550,798 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [658,798 ] [36 ] [550,798 ] 

ROTARY 

008 AH–64 BLOCK II/WRA ........................................................................... 1 35,500 1 –35,500 1 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–1 ] [–35,500 ] [–35,500 ] [–35,500 ] 

012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) .................................................. 4 72,000 4 72,000 4 54,500 4 72,000 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–17,500 ] 

017 KIOWA WARRIOR UPGRADE (OH–58 D)/WRA ........................................ 15 145,500 15 145,500 15 145,500 –44,700 15 100,800 

Limit ramp rate on replacement aircraft by reducing four aircraft. [–44,700 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

019 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS .......................................................................... 10,800 10,800 117,983 136,183 146,983 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
838 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [107,183 ] [136,183 ] 

022 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ....................................................... 54,500 54,500 54,500 54,500 033 RQ–7 UAV MODS .................................................................................. 94,600 94,600 94,600 –79,800 14,800 

Vader - Incompatible with Host Platform ................................... [–79,800 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARE PARTS (AIR) .............................................................................. –79,000 0 

VADER ISR payload not compatible with host platform ............ [–79,000 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 21 423,400 20 387,900 21 1,046,881 36 516,481 57 939,881 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

004 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 907 107,556 907 107,556 907 107,556 907 107,556 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

009 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 210 19,000 210 19,000 210 19,000 210 19,000 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 1,117 126,556 1,117 126,556 1,117 126,556 1,117 126,556 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

019 MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL ........................................................ 31,102 31,102 31,102 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [31,102 ] [31,102 ] 

020 LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN ........................................... 118 5,427 118 5,427 118 5,427 118 5,427 029 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION (CRO .................. 64 14,890 64 14,890 64 14,890 64 14,890 031 HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) ............................................................... 13,066 13,066 13,066 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [13,066 ] [13,066 ] 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

033 M4 CARBINE MODS .............................................................................. 16,800 16,800 16,800 16,800 034 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 48,856 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [48,856 ] 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 182 37,117 182 37,117 182 130,141 44,168 182 81,285 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
839 

009 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 010 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

013 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 014 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ................................................................ 49,140 49,140 49,140 49,140 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

019 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

ARTILLERY FUZES 

022 ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

ROCKETS 

027 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 028 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 53,841 53,841 53,841 53,841 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

029 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 031 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 032 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

036 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 037 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 400 400 400 400 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 208,381 208,381 208,381 208,381 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

005 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 32 11,094 32 11,094 32 11,094 32 11,094 007 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 47,214 47,214 47,214 47,214 010 MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY ..................................................... 8,671 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [8,671 ] 

015 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS .................................. 39,908 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [39,908 ] 

017 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 127,862 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [127,862 ] 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

023 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .......................................................... 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

025 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ................................... 547 547 547 547 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

039 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ........................................................... 450 450 450 –450 0 

Handheld, Manpack, Small Form-fit radios for LEMV#2 early to 

need.

[–450 ] 

042 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS - OPA2 ............................................................... 8,141 8,141 8,141 8,141 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
840 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

049 GUNSHOT DETECTION SYSTEM (GDS) ................................................... 44,100 44,100 –34,000 10,100 

Concurrent development and procurement ................................. [–44,100 ] [–34,000 ] 

051 MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE (MC4) .............................. 6,443 6,443 6,443 6,443 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

056 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP ............................... 54,730 54,730 54,730 –54,730 0 

Army requested transfer to line 56a, Family of Biometrics ....... [–54,730 ] 

056A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS ........................................................................ 54,730 54,730 

Transfer from line 56 .................................................................. [54,730 ] 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

058 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM( ...................... 169,500 169,500 169,500 169,500 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

070 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 83,000 83,000 207,548 83,000 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [124,548 ] 

072 TROJAN (MIP) ........................................................................................ 61,100 61,100 61,100 61,100 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

076 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 54,100 54,100 54,100 54,100 079 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITES .......................... 53,000 53,000 53,000 53,000 080 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 48,600 48,600 48,600 –24,400 24,200 

ISR Task Force identified excess ................................................ [–20,000 ] Platforms unavailable ................................................................. [–4,400 ] 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

084 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ..................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 090 COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C-RAM) ............................ 15,774 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [15,774 ] 

092 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM .................................................. 25,356 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [25,356 ] 

095 PROFILER .............................................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 30,400 30,400 30,400 30,400 098 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................................... 148,335 148,335 148,335 148,335 102 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 110,548 110,548 110,548 110,548 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
841 

105 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY .................................................................... 15,081 15,081 15,081 15,081 106 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM (BC ................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 108 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............................... 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 109 KNIGHT FAMILY ..................................................................................... 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 114 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE ....................... 32,800 32,800 32,800 32,800 115 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 44,000 44,000 44,000 44,000 116 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................................... 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

121 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP ................................................ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS UNDISTRIBUTED 

127A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 795 795 795 795 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

128 PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 11,472 11,472 11,472 11,472 129 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 30,000 30,000 30,000 –20,000 10,000 

Acoustic Hailing Device contract delay ...................................... [–20,000 ] 

130 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 41,204 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [41,204 ] 

131 CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION ................................................................ 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

133 TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................. 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 134 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ....................................................... 26,900 26,900 26,900 26,900 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

137 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ...................................... 22,297 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [22,297 ] 

138 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 3,205 3,205 3,205 3,205 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

149 FORCE PROVIDER ................................................................................. 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

158 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ................................................................. 15,011 15,011 15,011 15,011 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

159 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS ...................................... 25,129 25,129 25,129 25,129 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

180 ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM ................................................... 10 1,800 10 1,800 10 1,800 10 1,800 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

189 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 43,000 43,000 22,000 –21,000 22,000 

Prior year unobligated funds available ...................................... [–21,000 ] [–21,000 ] 

190 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ................................................. 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 42 1,398,195 42 1,398,195 42 1,738,715 –99,850 42 1,298,345 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
842 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ......................................................................... 1,368,800 1,368,800 1,211,800 –93,000 1,275,800 

BAA S&T Response—unjustified request ................................... [–50,000 ] [–76,000 ] Information Fusion—unjustified program growth ...................... [–17,000 ] [–17,000 ] Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–90,000 ] 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ............................................................................. 961,200 961,200 811,200 –150,000 811,200 

Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–150,000 ] [–150,000 ] 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE ................................................................................. 247,500 247,500 224,450 –23,050 224,450 

Train the Force Response—unjustified program growth ........... [–18,050 ] [–18,050 ] Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .......................................................................................... 200,634 199,134 199,134 

Civilian Pay Freeze ...................................................................... [–1,500 ] 

Transfer from Base: Operations .................................................. [220,634 ] [220,634 ] Undistributed efficiencies reduction ........................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND ................ 2,577,500 2,577,500 2,448,084 –66,916 2,510,584 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 UH–1Y/AH–1Z ....................................................................................... 1 30,000 1 30,000 1 24,875 –5,125 1 24,875 

Excessive unit cost growth ......................................................... [–5,125 ] [–5,125 ] 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ............................................................................. 1 163,500 1 163,500 1 –163,500 1 0 

Combat loss funded in fiscal year 2011 .................................... [–163,500 ] [–163,500 ] 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT .................................................................. 21,882 21,882 21,882 –21,882 0 

Aircraft excess to requirement .................................................... [–21,882 ] 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 53,100 53,100 53,100 –7,500 45,600 

Intrepid Tiger ............................................................................... [–7,500 ] 

031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 53,485 53,485 53,485 53,485 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
843 

032 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 46,992 46,992 46,992 46,992 034 AH–1W SERIES ..................................................................................... 39,418 39,418 37,918 –1,500 37,918 

ANVIS HUD install kit pricing ..................................................... [–1,500 ] [–1,500 ] 

035 H–53 SERIES ........................................................................................ 70,747 70,747 63,747 –7,000 63,747 

Excess hardware support ............................................................ [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] Excess NRE for Blue Force Tracker modifications ...................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

037 H–1 SERIES .......................................................................................... 6,420 6,420 6,420 –6,420 0 

Top-owl modification funding ..................................................... [–6,420 ] 

038 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 20,800 20,800 20,800 20,800 043 C–130 SERIES ...................................................................................... 59,625 59,625 45,825 –15,400 44,225 

LAIRCM install unit cost ............................................................. [–3,600 ] [–5,200 ] Targeting Sight Systems exceed requirement ............................. [–10,200 ] [–10,200 ] 

045 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ........................................................... 25,880 25,880 18,280 –7,600 18,280 

Excess C–20G installation NRE .................................................. [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] UC–12W excess to need .............................................................. [–3,600 ] [–3,600 ] 

048 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 11,184 11,184 11,184 11,184 053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 27,200 27,200 24,200 –3,000 24,200 

Other support excess ................................................................... [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

054 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 13,467 13,467 11,467 –2,000 11,467 

OSIP 10–11 other support growth .............................................. [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

055 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ............................................... 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 060 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ........................................................ 30,000 30,000 25,500 –4,500 25,500 

Deficiencies modifications other support growth ....................... [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] Reliability modifications other support growth .......................... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

061 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 39,060 39,060 39,060 –4,598 34,462 

MQ–8 spares excess to requirement .......................................... [–3,631 ] Other Support Aircraft spares ..................................................... [–967 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

062 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800 064 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 27,300 0 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [27,300 ] 

065 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 2 730,960 2 730,960 2 550,235 –250,025 2 480,935 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 140 14,000 140 14,000 140 14,000 140 14,000 010 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) .......................... 150 20,000 150 20,000 150 20,000 150 20,000 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
844 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 7,070 7,070 7,070 7,070 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 290 41,070 290 41,070 290 41,070 290 41,070 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 80,200 80,200 80,200 80,200 004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 22,400 22,400 22,400 22,400 007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 182 182 182 182 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 4,545 4,545 4,545 4,545 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 1,656 1,656 1,656 1,656 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 19,575 19,575 19,575 19,575 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 6,691 6,691 6,691 6,691 017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 12,184 12,184 12,184 12,184 018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 10,988 10,988 10,988 10,988

019 81MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 24,515 24,515 24,515 24,515020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 11,227 11,227 11,227 11,227 021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 802 802 802 802 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 5,911 5,911 5,911 5,911 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 18,871 18,871 18,871 18,871 024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 57,003 57,003 57,003 57,003 025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 7,831 7,831 7,831 7,831 026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 5,177 5,177 5,177 5,177 027 NON LETHALS ........................................................................................ 712 712 712 712 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 630 630 630 630 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 317,100 317,100 317,100 317,100 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SMALL BOATS 

023 STANDARD BOATS ................................................................................. 13,729 13,729 13,729 –13,729 0 

Coastal force protection boats contract delay ........................... [–13,729 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
845 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

056 MATCALS ............................................................................................... 7,232 7,232 7,232 –7,232 0 

Radar upgrade - Transfer to Title I ............................................ [–7,232 ] 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

066 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS ........................................................... 4,000 4,000 4,000 –4,000 0 

Unjustified request for tech refresh upgrades ........................... [–4,000 ] 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

092 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ................................................................... 47,000 47,000 47,000 47,000 095 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800 097 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ....................................................................... 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 101 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 18,226 18,226 18,226 18,226 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

112 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 7,500 7,500 7,500 –7,500 0 

Naval Intelligence Fusion Tool—Transfer to Title I ................... [–7,500 ] 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

116 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............................................. 15,700 15,700 15,700 15,700 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 2,628 2,628 1,155 2,628 

Unjustified Growth ....................................................................... [–1,473 ] 

123 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............................................. 13,290 13,290 13,290 13,290 124 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 3,672 3,672 3,672 3,672 128 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .................................................................... 1,002 1,002 1,002 1,002 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

130 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 3,644 3,644 3,644 3,644 

TRAINING DEVICES 

134 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 5,789 5,789 –5,789 0 

Funding No Longer Required ....................................................... [–5,789 ] [–5,789 ] 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 3,310 3,310 3,310 3,310 140 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 6,977 6,977 6,977 6,977 141 C4ISR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 24,762 24,762 24,762 24,762 143 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 78,241 78,241 70,641 –7,600 70,641 

Intelligence Kits - Funding No Longer Required Due to Force 

Structure Reductions.

[–7,600 ] [–7,600 ] 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

149 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 473 473 473 473 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 281,975 281,975 267,113 –45,850 236,125 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
846 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

002 LAV PIP ................................................................................................. 23,962 23,962 23,962 23,962 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................................. 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ....................................... 10,488 10,488 10,488 10,488 006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION ...................... 27,373 27,373 27,373 27,373 

GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ................................................................................................. 2,527 2,527 2,527 2,527 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 59,730 59,730 59,730 59,730

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 19,040 19,040 19,040 19,040 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 2,331 2,331 2,331 2,331 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 3,090 3,090 3,090 3,090 019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ............................................................. 5,236 5,236 5,236 5,236 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 26,506 26,506 26,506 26,506

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

021 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................................................ 35 35 35 35 022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 47,132 47,132 47,132 47,132 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 9,850 9,850 9,850 9,850 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 18,629 18,629 18,629 18,629 030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 31,491 31,491 31,491 31,491 031 RADIO SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 87,027 87,027 87,027 87,027 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................ 54,177 54,177 124,177 70,000 124,177 

Data distribution system modules .............................................. [50,000 ] [50,000 ] 

Digital technical control shelters ................................................ [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 

033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................................ 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .................................................... 95,800 95,800 95,800 95,800 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
847 

038 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ......................................... 783 392,391 783 342,391 783 92,391 –218,000 783 174,391 

Early to Need ............................................................................... [–50,000 ] Marine Corps requested transfer to line 32 for Data Distribution System. [–50,000 ] Marine Corps requested transfer to line 32 for Digital Technical Control System. [–20,000 ] Marine Corps requested transfer to line 39 for LVSR ................ [–148,000 ] MTVR Reduction .......................................................................... [–300,000 ] 

039 LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP ......................................................... 66 38,382 66 38,382 66 38,382 66 38,382 

040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ............................................................ 24,826 24,826 24,826 24,826 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

043 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 18,775 18,775 18,775 18,775 044 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 7,361 7,361 7,361 7,361 046 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 51,895 51,895 106,895 55,000 106,895 

Advanced power sources ............................................................. [20,000 ] [20,000 ] Mobile power equipment ............................................................. [35,000 ] [35,000 ] 

048 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 57,237 57,237 57,237 57,237 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

049 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 42,900 42,900 42,900 42,900 051 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ................................................................. 42,553 42,553 42,553 42,553 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

053 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 8,307 8,307 8,307 8,307 054 TRAINING DEVICES ................................................................................ 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 055 CONTAINER FAMILY ............................................................................... 12 12 12 12 056 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 28,533 28,533 28,533 28,533 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 849 1,260,996 849 1,210,996 849 1,085,996 –93,000 849 1,167,996 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE HELICOPTERS 

019 V22 OSPREY ......................................................................................... 2 70,000 2 –70,000 2 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–2 ] [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

024 HH–60M ................................................................................................ 2 39,300 2 39,300 2 39,300 2 39,300 027 STUASL0 ................................................................................................ 2,472 2,472 2,472 2,472 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

034 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 783,592 719,592 719,592 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [783,592 ] [719,592 ] 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

043 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 59,299 59,299 59,299 59,299 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
848 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

059 MC–12W ............................................................................................... 17,300 17,300 17,300 17,300 063 C–130 ................................................................................................... 164,041 164,041 164,041 164,041 064 C–130 INTEL ......................................................................................... 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600065 C–130J MODS ....................................................................................... 27,983 27,983 27,983 27,983 067 COMPASS CALL MODS .......................................................................... 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 075 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 076 OTHER MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 077 MQ–1 MODS ......................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 

AIRCRAFT SPARES + REPAIR PARTS 

081 FIGHTER/UAV INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ...................................... 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

090 C–17A ................................................................................................... 10,970 10,970 10,970 10,970 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

099 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 87,220 87,220 87,220 

Transfer from Base ..................................................................... [87,220 ] [87,220 ] 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

100 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 

DARP 

104 U–2 ....................................................................................................... 42,300 42,300 13,400 –28,900 13,400 

Sensors ........................................................................................ [–28,900 ] [–28,900 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 4 527,865 2 457,865 4 1,299,777 707,912 4 1,235,777 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 329 329 329 329 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 8,014 8,014 8,014 8,014 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 17,385 17,385 17,385 17,385 005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 1,338 34,100 1,338 34,100 1,338 34,100 1,338 34,100 

FLARE, IR MJU–7B 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............................................. 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 

FUZES 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
849 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 11,217 11,217 11,217 11,217 012 FUZES ................................................................................................... 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 

SMALL ARMS 

013 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 1,338 92,510 1,338 92,510 1,338 92,510 1,338 92,510 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 154 16,120 154 16,120 154 16,120 154 16,120 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 100 12,300 100 12,300 100 12,300 100 12,300 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 254 28,420 254 28,420 254 28,420 254 28,420 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 2,658 2,658 2,658 –2,658 0 

Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–2,658 ] 

CARGO + UTILITY VEHICLES 

004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (CARGO ................................................ 32,824 32,824 32,824 –32,824 0 

Unjustified request ...................................................................... [–32,824 ] 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SPECIA ............................................... 110 110 110 110 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................................... 1,662 1,662 1,662 1,662 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 .............................................................. 772 772 772 772 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M BASE MAINT/CONST ........................................ 13,983 13,983 13,983 13,983 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

013 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY .......................................................... 500 500 500 500 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 3 1,800 3 1,800 3 1,800 3 1,800 025 TAC SIGNIT SPT .................................................................................... 7,020 7,020 7,020 7,020 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................................ 25,920 25,920 25,920 25,920 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 9,445 9,445 9,445 9,445 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES ........................................................................ 12,900 12,900 12,900 12,900 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 18,100 18,100 18,100 18,100 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
850 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 9,800 9,800 9,800 9,800 062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (BASE S) .............................................. 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 64,400 64,400 64,400 64,400 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 2,991,347 2,991,347 2,890,685 –80,649 2,910,698 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................. [–100,662 ] [–80,649 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 3 3,204,641 3 3,204,641 3 3,103,979 –116,131 3 3,088,510 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

017 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 3,307 3,307 3,307 3,307 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

043 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

046 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ...................................................... 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

048A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 101,548 101,548 101,548 –5,000 96,548 

Program adjustment .................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

050 MH–47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM ....................................... 2 40,500 2 40,500 2 –40,500 2 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–40,500 ] [–40,500 ] 

051 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 1 7,800 1 –1 –7,800 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–1 ] [–7,800 ] [–7,800 ] [–1 ] [–7,800 ] 

052 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ..................................................................... 9 8,500 9 8,500 9 9 8,500 

NSAV-L Transfer to Base ............................................................. [–8,500 ] 

057 CV–22 MODIFICATION ........................................................................... 1 15,000 1 –15,000 1 0 

Combat Loss funded in FY11 ..................................................... [–1 ] [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

063 C–130 MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 5 4,800 5 4,800 5 4,800 5 4,800

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

067 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ................................................................ 8,682,966 71,659 8,682,966 71,659 8,682,966 71,659 8,682,966 71,659 

068 ORDNANCE ACQUISITION ...................................................................... 235 25,400 235 25,400 235 25,400 –10,000 235 15,400 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
851 

Prior year funding carryover ........................................................ [–10,000 ] 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

069 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS ............................. 5 2,325 5 2,325 5 2,325 5 2,325 070 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 149 43,558 149 43,558 149 36,758 5,500 149 49,058 

Funded by reprogramming .......................................................... [–6,800 ] Village Stability Operations [VSO] unfunded requirement ......... [5,500 ] 

071 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 2,522 6,488 2,522 6,488 2,522 6,488 2,000 2,522 8,488 

VSO unfunded requirement ......................................................... [2,000 ] 

072 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS .......................... 1 2,601 1 2,601 1 2,601 1 2,601 078 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 88 15,818 88 15,818 88 15,818 4,000 88 19,818 

VSO unfunded requirement ......................................................... [4,000 ] 

085 AUTOMATION SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 15 13,387 15 13,387 15 13,387 15 13,387 087 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ..................................... 4 5,800 4 5,800 4 4,800 4 5,800 

Funded by reprogramming .......................................................... [–1,000 ] 

088 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS .................................. 1,103 34,900 1,103 34,900 1,103 34,900 2,600 1,103 37,500 

VSO unfunded requirement ......................................................... [2,600 ] 

089 VISUAL AUGMENTATION LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS ..................... 578 3,531 578 3,531 578 3,531 578 3,531 090 TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS ................................................................... 18 2,894 18 2,894 18 2,894 18 2,894 093 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 30 7,220 30 7,220 30 7,220 30 7,220 094 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 50 41,632 50 41,632 50 41,632 50 41,632 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 8,687,782 469,968 8,687,780 447,168 8,687,782 390,368 –1 –64,200 8,687,781 405,768 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 100,000 50,000 100,000 –100,000 0 

Unjustified Requirement .............................................................. [–50,000 ] [–100,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 100,000 50,000 100,000 –100,000 0 

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND 

001 MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND ........................................ 3,195,170 3,195,170 3,195,170 –595,000 2,600,170

Funds previously provided by Department of Army in FY11 ...... [–595,000 ] 

TOTAL MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROT VEH FUND ............... 3,195,170 3,195,170 3,195,170 –595,000 2,600,170 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT UNDISTRIBUTED 

007 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................... 225,000 225,000 225,000 

Program Increase ........................................................................ [225,000 ] [225,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT ................. 225,000 225,000 225,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
852 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2012 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Conference 

Change 

Conference 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 8,691,884 15,021,824 8,691,879 15,018,524 8,691,884 16,170,496 35 62,589 8,691,919 15,084,413 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 21,064 21,064 21,064 21,064 002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 213,942 215,942 213,942 213,942 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [2,000 ] 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 80,977 89,977 80,977 80,977 

Clinical Care and Research .................................................................... [2,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [7,000 ] 

004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS ........................................... 120,937 105,692 120,937 120,937

Realignment of Funds for Proper Oversight and Execution ................... [–15,245 ] 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 436,920 432,675 436,920 436,920 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 30,258 40,758 30,258 30,258 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
853 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,500 ] 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY .................................................... 43,521 53,521 43,521 43,521 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP .................................................................................................... 14,230 14,230 14,230 14,230 008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 44,610 44,610 44,610 44,610 

009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 15,790 15,790 15,790 15,790 010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 50,685 50,685 50,685 50,685 011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 20,034 20,034 20,034 20,034 012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION ......................................................... 20,933 30,933 20,933 20,933 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 64,306 64,306 64,306 64,306 014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 59,214 59,214 59,214 59,214 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY ...................... 4,877 4,877 4,877 4,877 016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 8,244 8,244 8,244 8,244 017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 39,813 69,813 39,813 39,813 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [30,000 ] 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ....................................................... 62,962 62,962 62,962 62,962 

019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 57,203 69,203 57,203 –2,000 55,203 

Program growth adjustment ................................................................... [–2,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [12,000 ] 

020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 20,280 24,780 20,280 20,280 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [4,500 ] 

021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 21,801 21,801 21,801 21,801 022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 20,837 20,837 20,837 20,837 

023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................. 26,116 26,116 26,116 26,116 024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ....................................................... 8,591 8,591 8,591 8,591 025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 80,317 86,317 80,317 80,317 

Rotary Wing Surfaces ............................................................................. [6,000 ] 

026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 18,946 18,946 18,946 18,946 027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................. 29,835 29,835 29,835 29,835 

028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 105,929 118,897 105,929 105,929 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [12,968 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
854 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 869,332 965,300 869,332 –2,000 867,332 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 52,979 57,979 52,979 52,979 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 68,171 94,171 68,171 68,171 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [23,000 ] Treatment of Wounded Warriors ............................................................. [3,000 ] 

031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 62,193 89,993 62,193 62,193 

Advanced Rotorcraft Flight Research ..................................................... [8,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [19,800 ] 

032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 77,077 82,077 77,077 77,077 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................... 106,145 106,145 106,145 106,145 034 0603006A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............... 5,312 8,312 5,312 5,312 

Communications Advanced Technology .................................................. [3,000 ] 

035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................ 10,298 10,298 10,298 10,298 036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 57,963 57,963 53,963 57,963 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE .................................................................................................. 8,155 8,155 8,155 8,155 038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS ................................... 17,936 17,936 17,936 17,936 039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE ................................................................................................ 12,597 12,597 12,597 12,597 

040 0603105A MILITARY HIV RESEARCH ................................................................................. 6,796 6,796 6,796 6,796 041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................. 12,191 12,191 12,191 12,191 042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................................................. 4,278 4,278 4,278 4,278 043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS ................................................................................................ 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 23,677 23,677 23,677 23,677 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
855 

045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................. 90,602 101,152 90,602 90,602 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,550 ] 

046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 10,315 10,315 10,315 10,315 047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ....................... 183,150 183,150 183,150 183,150 048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................ 31,541 31,541 31,541 31,541 049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 7,686 7,686 7,686 7,686 050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 42,414 56,214 42,414 42,414 

Night Vision Advanced Technology ......................................................... [4,800 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [9,000 ] 

051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................... 15,959 15,959 15,959 15,959 052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 36,516 43,516 36,516 36,516 

Base Camp Fuel ..................................................................................... [2,000 ] Military Engineering Advanced Technology ............................................ [5,000 ] 

053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ......... 30,600 30,600 30,600 30,600 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 976,812 1,074,962 972,812 976,812 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

055 0603305A ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION(NON SPACE) ....................... 21,126 21,126 9,126 –12,000 9,126 

Excess growth and delays ...................................................................... [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

055A 0603XXXA INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION ............................................................................ 14,883 14,883 14,883 14,883 

056 0603308A ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (SPACE) .............................. 9,612 9,612 9,612 9,612 058 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV .............................................. 35,383 35,383 19,293 –16,090 19,293 

Excess to Army requirement ................................................................... [–16,090 ] [–16,090 ] 

059 0603627A SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING SYS-ADV DEV ......................... 9,501 4,501 5,265 –5,000 4,501 

Engineering, Modeling and Environmental Studies for SOD and SOM 

systems – funding unjustified.

[–5,000 ] 

Program growth adjustment ................................................................... [–5,000 ] Projected and Generated Obscuration System unexecutable ................. [–4,236 ] 

060 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ...................................................... 39,693 39,693 39,693 39,693 

061 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ................................................. 101,408 101,408 64,408 –37,000 64,408 

Program growth adjustment ................................................................... [–37,000 ] [–37,000 ] 

062 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY ........................................................... 9,747 9,747 9,747 –5,904 3,843 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
856 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Rapid Equipping Force- Lack of baseline requirement ......................... [–5,904 ] 

063 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV ........................... 5,766 5,766 5,766 5,766 065 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 4,946 12,946 4,946 4,946 

Army Net Zero Programs ......................................................................... [8,000 ] 

066 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL ............................................. 297,955 297,955 182,955 –115,000 182,955 

Program reduction Increment III ............................................................. [–115,000 ] [–115,000 ] 

067 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 4,765 4,765 4,765 4,765

068 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ........................................................................................ 7,107 7,107 7,107 7,107 069 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV ......................................... 19,509 19,509 12,509 –7,000 12,509 

Army requested transfer LAMPS to RDTE Army line 109 ....................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

070 0603805A COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT CONTROL SYSTEM EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS 5,258 5,258 5,258 5,258 071 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ........................................................................ 34,997 34,997 34,997 34,997 

072 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 19,598 19,598 19,598 19,598 073 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE .................................................................. 1,496 1,496 1,496 1,496 074 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ........................................................... 10,181 10,181 10,181 10,181 075 0604131A TRACTOR JUTE .................................................................................................. 15,609 15,609 

Unjustified requirement .......................................................................... [–15,609 ] [–15,609 ] 

076 0604284A JOINT COOPERATIVE TARGET IDENTIFICATION—GROUND (JCTI-G) / TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPME. 41,652 41,652 –26,600 15,052 

Army offered program reduction ............................................................. [–41,652 ] [–26,600 ] 

077 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................................................ 42,892 42,892 42,892 42,892 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 753,084 740,475 504,497 –224,594 528,490 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

078 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................................................... 144,687 144,687 119,187 –25,000 119,687 

JTRS AMF delays and JPALS excessive growth ....................................... [–25,500 ] [–25,000 ] 

079 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................................................... 166,132 131,132 92,203 –83,690 82,442 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
857 

Army offered program reduction ............................................................. [–35,000 ] [–73,929 ] [–83,690 ] 

080 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 101,265 101,265 26,872 –67,000 34,265 

Army offered program reduction ............................................................. [–74,393 ] [–67,000 ] 

082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ...................................................................... 17,412 17,412 7,412 –10,000 7,412 

Machine—Foreign Language Translation System contract delay ......... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 26,577 26,577 26,577 26,577 084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ......................................................................... 73,728 76,728 91,474 9,746 83,474 

Army requested transfer from WTCV Army line 17 ................................ [46 ] Portable Helicopter Oxygen Delivery Systems ......................................... [3,000 ] S61—High concurrency of incremental efforts ..................................... [–8,000 ] Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 17 ........................................ [16,000 ] [16,046 ] Transfer at Army request from WTCV line 20 ........................................ [1,700 ] [1,700 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................................... 3,961 3,961 3,961 3,961 

087 0604611A JAVELIN ............................................................................................................. 17,340 17,340 9,940 –7,400 9,940 

Excess to requirement ............................................................................ [–7,400 ] [–7,400 ] 

088 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................... 5,478 5,478 5,478 5,478 089 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................... 22,922 22,922 22,922 22,922 090 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES .............................................................. 20,000 20,000 20,000 

Army requested transfer from RDTE line 109 ........................................ [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 

093 0604661A FCS SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS ENGR & PROGRAM MGMT ................................... 383,872 383,872 283,872 –85,000 298,872 

Unjustified requirement .......................................................................... [–100,000 ] [–85,000 ] 

095 0604663A FCS UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES ................................................................ 143,840 143,840 26,840 –107,840 36,000 

Program adjustment ............................................................................... [–117,000 ] [–107,840 ] 

096 0604664A FCS UNATTENDED GROUND SENSORS ............................................................. 499 499 –499 0 

Program termination ............................................................................... [–499 ] [–499 ] 

098 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—SDD ........................................................................ 59,265 59,265 59,265 59,265 

099 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT .............................................. 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 100 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—SDD .......................................................... 30,021 30,021 30,021 30,021 101 0604716A TERRAIN INFORMATION—SDD ......................................................................... 1,596 1,596 1,596 1,596 102 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—SDD ...................... 83,010 83,010 83,010 83,010 103 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 28,305 28,305 28,305 28,305 104 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 14,375 14,375 14,375 14,375 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
858 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

105 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—SDD ................................... 15,803 15,803 15,803 15,803 107 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE ........................................ 22,226 22,226 22,226 22,226 108 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—SDD .................................................................... 13,828 3,828 13,828 13,828 

Program Reduction- Precision Guidance Kit .......................................... [–10,000 ] 

109 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—SDD ................................................ 251,104 226,104 238,104 –77,793 173,311 

Army request transfer from RDTE line 69 .............................................. [7,000 ] [7,000 ] Army requested transfer to RDTE Army line 90 ..................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Schedule Slip ............................................. [–25,000 ] [–64,793 ] 

110 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—SDD ............................. 137,811 137,811 81,811 –56,000 81,811 

Excessive growth Joint Battle Command-Platform ................................ [–56,000 ] [–56,000 ] 

111 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—SDD ........ 27,160 27,160 27,160 27,160 112 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—SDD .............................................................. 87,426 87,426 66,326 –11,100 76,326 

Explosive Hazard Pre-Detonation (EHP) Roller contract delay ............... [–21,100 ] [–11,100 ] 

113 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS ..................................................................................... 42,627 42,627 35,627 –5,000 37,627 

Program growth adjustment ................................................................... [–7,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

115 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE ................ 123,935 125,935 93,935 –30,000 93,935 

Army Tactical Command and Control Hardware and Software ............. [2,000 ] Excessive Growth .................................................................................... [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

116 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 2,890 2,890 2,890 2,890 

117 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) .............................. 794 794 794 794 118 0604823A FIREFINDER ....................................................................................................... 10,358 10,358 10,358 10,358 119 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL ......................................................... 48,309 40,709 55,909 13,100 61,409 

Early to Need- Nett Warrior .................................................................... [–7,600 ] Transfer at Army request from OPA line 147 ........................................ [7,600 ] [13,100 ] 

120 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS ........................................................................................ 120,146 120,146 120,146 120,146 

121 0604869A PATRIOT/MEADS COMBINED AGGREGATE PROGRAM (CAP) ............................. 406,605 257,105 –16,605 390,000 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–149,500 ] [–406,605 ] [–16,605 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
859 

122 0604870A NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL MONITORING SENSOR NETWORK ........................... 7,398 7,398 7,398 7,398 123 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 37,098 37,098 32,098 –5,000 32,098 

Unjustified cost growth .......................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

124 0605018A ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMHRS) ......... 68,693 68,693 68,693 68,693 125 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 127,095 127,095 127,095 127,095 

126 0605455A SLAMRAAM ........................................................................................................ 19,931 19,931 1,531 –18,400 1,531 

Excess to program termination requirements ........................................ [–18,400 ] [–18,400 ] 

127 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE ........................................................................................ 88,993 88,993 88,993 88,993 128 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) ................................ 270,607 270,607 270,607 270,607 129 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE .............................................................................. 884,387 884,387 884,387 –435,000 449,387 

Excessive Technology Ramp-up prior to completion of Analysis of Alternatives. [–435,000 ] 

130 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR ................................................................................ 31,465 31,465 31,465 

Program termination ............................................................................... [–31,465 ] 

131 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 ................................................................................................ 3,920 3,920 3,920 3,920 

132 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 13,819 13,819 13,819 13,819 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 4,190,788 3,968,688 3,238,843 –998,481 3,192,307 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

133 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 16,992 16,992 16,992 16,992 134 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 11,247 11,247 11,247 11,247 135 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 49,437 49,437 49,437 49,437 136 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER .................................................................................... 20,384 20,384 20,384 20,384 137 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL .................................................................................. 145,606 145,606 145,606 145,606 138 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ........................................................ 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 139 0605502A SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH ....................................................... 5,000 0 

Small Business Innovative Research ..................................................... [5,000 ] 

140 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ............................................................... 262,456 362,456 312,456 50,000 312,456 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [100,000 ] [50,000 ] [50,000 ] 

141 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS ............................. 70,227 70,227 70,227 70,227 142 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ................................................................ 43,483 43,483 43,483 43,483 143 0605605A DOD HIGH ENERGY LASER TEST FACILITY ....................................................... 18 18 18 18 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
860 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

144 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION ................................................................................. 5,630 5,630 5,630 5,630 145 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES ........................................ 7,182 7,182 7,182 7,182 146 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 19,669 19,669 19,669 19,669 147 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ................................................................... 5,445 5,445 5,445 5,445 148 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ............................................................... 68,786 68,786 68,786 68,786 149 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER ............................................................................. 63,302 63,302 63,302 63,302 150 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG ............................ 3,420 3,420 3,420 3,420 151 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 83,054 83,054 83,054 83,054 152 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................. 63,872 58,872 63,872 –5,000 58,872 

Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

153 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY ......................... 57,142 62,142 57,142 57,142 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

154 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT .............................. 4,961 4,961 4,961 4,961 155 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 17,558 17,558 17,558 17,558 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 1,048,671 1,153,671 1,098,671 45,000 1,093,671 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

158 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 66,641 66,641 66,641 66,641 159 0603820A WEAPONS CAPABILITY MODIFICATIONS UAV .................................................... 24,142 7,500 –16,642 7,500

Excess funds only to the analysis of alternatives ................................. [–24,142 ] [–16,642 ] [–16,642 ] 

160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ................................................................... 344,655 323,655 327,855 –16,800 327,855 

Excess program growth .......................................................................... [–21,000 ] [–16,800 ] [–16,800 ]

162 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .............................................. 29,546 29,546 29,546 29,546 163 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ................................................. 53,307 78,307 53,307 –17,100 36,207 

AMPV ....................................................................................................... [–17,100 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [25,000 ] 

164 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................................... 65,002 65,002 42,414 –22,588 42,414 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
861 

Unjustified program growth .................................................................... [–22,588 ] [–22,588 ] 

165 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................... 163,205 163,205 149,705 –13,500 149,705 

Excess funds to Black Hawk Recapitalization/Modernization for analysis of alternatives. [–13,500 ] [–13,500 ] 

166 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 823 823 823 823 167 0203758A DIGITIZATION ..................................................................................................... 8,029 8,029 8,029 8,029 169 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................ 44,560 59,060 59,060 10,000 54,560 

Transfer at Army Request from MPA line 13 ......................................... [14,500 ] [14,500 ] [10,000 ] 

171 0203808A TRACTOR CARD ................................................................................................ 42,554 42,554 42,554 42,554 172 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ................................................................... 27,630 27,630 27,630 27,630 173 0208058A JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ................................................................... 3,044 3,044 3,044 3,044 175 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 2,854 2,854 2,854 2,854176 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 61,220 61,220 58,720 61,220 

Army offered program reduction ............................................................. [–2,500 ] 

177 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 100,505 100,505 160,745 60,240 160,745 

Army requested transfer for AESIP from OPA line 116 .......................... [13,000 ] [13,000 ] Army requested transfer for GCSS-Army from OPA line 116 ................. [47,240 ] [47,240 ] 

178 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ...................................................... 12,104 12,104 12,104 12,104

179 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................... 23,937 23,937 23,937 23,937 181 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 40,650 40,650 26,550 –14,100 26,550 

Contract award delays ............................................................................ [–14,100 ] [–14,100 ] 

182 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 44,198 44,198 31,699 –12,499 31,699 

Unjustified requirements growth ............................................................ [–12,499 ] [–12,499 ] 

183 0305219A MQ–1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV ............................................................................. 137,038 137,038 122,038 –15,000 122,038 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

184 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 1,938 1,938 1,938 1,938 185 0305233A RQ–7 UAV ........................................................................................................ 31,940 31,940 31,940 31,940 187 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE .............................................................. 15,018 15,018 15,018 15,018 

188 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES ......................................... 59,297 66,297 59,297 59,297 

End Item Industrial Preparedness Activities .......................................... [7,000 ] 

188A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 4,536 4,536 4,536 4,536 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 1,408,373 1,409,731 1,369,484 –57,989 1,350,384 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
862 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ................... 9,683,980 9,745,502 8,490,559 –1,238,064 8,445,916 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 113,157 123,157 113,157 113,157 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 18,092 18,092 18,092 18,092 003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 446,123 450,623 446,123 446,123 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [2,500 ] Study of Renewable and Alternative Energy Applications in the Pacific 

Region.

[2,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 577,372 591,872 577,372 577,372 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 104,804 104,804 64,804 104,804 

Program Decrease- Electromagnetic railgun .......................................... [–10,000 ] Program Decrease- Free Electron Laser ................................................. [–30,000 ] 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 156,901 158,901 156,901 156,901 

Alternative Energy for Mobile Power Applications .................................. [2,000 ] 

006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 44,845 47,845 44,845 44,845 

Marine Corps Landing Force Technology ................................................ [3,000 ] 

008 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................................... 65,448 65,448 65,448 65,448 

009 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH ............................................ 101,205 103,705 101,205 101,205

Warfighter Sustainment Applied Research ............................................. [2,500 ] 

010 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 108,329 108,329 108,329 108,329 011 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH .............................. 50,076 50,076 50,076 50,076 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
863 

012 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 5,937 5,937 5,937 5,937 013 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ...................................................... 108,666 108,666 108,666 108,666 014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 37,583 45,583 37,583 37,583 

Mine and Expeditionary Warfare Applied Research ............................... [8,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 783,794 799,294 743,794 783,794 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 114,270 114,270 59,370 114,270

Program Decrease- Electromagnetic railgun .......................................... [–16,900 ] Underexecution—Navy recommendation ................................................ [–38,000 ] 

016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 64,057 71,157 45,234 –18,823 45,234 

Advanced Battery Technologies .............................................................. [2,000 ] Excess MRMUAS funding ........................................................................ [–18,823 ] Lightweight Body Armor .......................................................................... [5,100 ] Transfer MRMUAS to line 220 ................................................................ [–18,823 ] 

017 0603235N COMMON PICTURE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 49,068 49,068 49,068 49,068 018 0603236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................... 71,232 71,232 71,232 71,232 019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................. 102,535 102,535 102,535 102,535 020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) ................................ 124,324 124,324 124,324 124,324 021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11,286 11,286 11,286 11,286 022 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 18,119 18,119 18,119 18,119 023 0603747N UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 37,121 37,121 37,121 37,121 024 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 50,157 50,157 50,157 50,157 025 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..................... 6,048 6,048 6,048 6,048 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 648,217 655,317 574,494 –18,823 629,394 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

026 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ................................................................ 94,972 94,972 73,672 –10,000 84,972 

JMAPS unjustified request ...................................................................... [–21,300 ] [–10,000 ] 

027 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .................................................................................. 10,893 10,893 10,893 10,893 

028 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ................................................ 3,702 3,702 3,702 3,702 029 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 10,497 10,497 10,497 10,497 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
864 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

030 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 7,915 7,915 7,915 7,915 031 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE .......................................................... 5,978 5,978 5,978 5,978 032 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 1,418 1,418 1,418 1,418 033 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES ........................... 142,657 142,657 142,657 –14,900 127,757 

Program execution .................................................................................. [–8,900 ] UUV program delay ................................................................................. [–6,000 ] 

034 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE .................................................................. 118,764 118,764 118,764 118,764 035 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 54,072 54,072 54,072 54,072 037 0603525N PILOT FISH ........................................................................................................ 96,012 96,012 96,012 96,012 038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 73,421 73,421 73,421 73,421 039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................................................ 130,267 130,267 130,267 130,267 040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL .................................................................................. 1,338 1,338 1,338 1,338 041 0603553N SURFACE ASW .................................................................................................. 29,797 33,297 29,797 29,797 

Surface Anti-Submarine Warfare ............................................................ [3,500 ] 

042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 856,326 865,326 856,326 856,326 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [9,000 ] 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ..................................................... 9,253 9,253 9,253 9,253 044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN .................................................................. 14,308 14,308 14,308 14,308 

045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES ....................................... 22,213 42,113 22,213 22,213 

Ship Preliminary Design and Feasibility Studies ................................... [19,900 ] 

046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ........................................................... 463,683 463,683 463,683 463,683 

047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS .................................................... 18,249 28,249 18,249 18,249 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ................................................................................................... 584,159 584,159 584,159 584,159 049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ......................................................................... 286,784 286,784 282,784 –4,000 282,784 

Defer development of Irregular Warfare mission package .................... [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] 

050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ....................................................................... 34,157 34,157 34,157 34,157 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
865 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 4,753 4,753 4,753 4,753 052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ................................................................ 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................... 79,858 54,858 79,858 –24,877 54,981 

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Schedule Slip ............................................. [–25,000 ] [–24,877 ] 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 33,654 33,654 33,654 33,654 055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................ 54,783 54,783 54,783 54,783 056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 9,996 9,996 9,996 9,996 057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ......................................................................... 21,714 21,714 21,714 21,714 058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................................................. 70,538 70,538 70,538 70,538 059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ................................................................................ 3,754 3,754 3,754 3,754 060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ................................................................................................... 79,415 79,415 79,415 79,415 061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY ......................................................................... 4,137 4,137 4,137 4,137 062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ............................................................................................... 276,383 276,383 276,383 276,383 063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................................................. 52,721 52,721 52,721 52,721 064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ................................................................................................... 160,964 160,964 160,964 –10,000 150,964 

Classified adjustment ............................................................................. [–10,000 ] 

066 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................................................. 144,985 144,985 144,985 144,985 

067 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................................................ 43,704 43,704 43,704 43,704 068 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 9,140 9,140 9,140 9,140

069 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 421 421 421 421070 0603851M NONLETHAL WEAPONS ...................................................................................... 40,992 40,992 40,992 40,992 071 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS .................................... 121,455 121,455 121,455 –3,200 118,255 

Excess management services funding ................................................... [–3,200 ] 

075 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) ........ 64,107 64,107 64,107 64,107 076 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ............................................................. 711 711 711 711 077 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) ... 62,044 62,044 62,044 62,044 078 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ................................. 22,665 4,465 4,450 –19,215 3,450 

Excess support funding .......................................................................... [–1,000 ] FMU–164 fuze program termination ...................................................... [–18,200 ] [–18,215 ] [–18,215 ] 

079 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING 

SUPPORT.

33,621 33,621 33,621 33,621 

080 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ............................................................... 1,078 1,078 1,078 1,078 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
866 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

082 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .................................................. 625 625 625 625 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 4,481,053 4,480,253 4,437,538 –86,192 4,394,861 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

083 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 35,651 35,651 42,651 7,000 42,651 

Navy requested transfer from line 98 for VH–3/VH–60 sustainment ... [7,000 ] [7,000 ] 

084 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................................................... 30,676 30,676 30,676 30,676 

085 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 51,191 51,191 51,191 –1,700 49,491 

Collision avoidance safety program delay ............................................. [–1,700 ] 

086 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 17,673 17,673 17,673 17,673 087 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING ............................................................. 5,922 5,922 5,922 5,922 

088 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ...................................................................... 3,417 3,417 3,417 3,417 089 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM ............................................................................ 9,944 9,944 9,944 9,944 090 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM .......................................................................... 81,257 81,257 77,257 –4,000 77,257 

NTCSS--reduce program growth ............................................................. [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] 

091 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ........................................................................................ 110,994 110,994 110,994 110,994 

092 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................................................ 72,569 72,569 72,569 –5,000 67,569 

Development support funding growth .................................................... [–5,000 ] 

093 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ........................................................................... 56,509 56,509 56,509 –7,611 48,898 

High Altitude ASW program delay .......................................................... [–1,611 ] Management services funding growth ................................................... [–6,000 ] 

094 0604262N V–22A ............................................................................................................... 84,477 84,477 84,477 84,477 

095 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ................................................................ 3,249 3,249 3,249 3,249 

096 0604269N EA–18 ............................................................................................................... 17,100 17,100 17,100 17,100 097 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 89,418 89,418 89,418 89,418 098 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 180,070 180,070 60,770 –119,300 60,770 

Early to need ........................................................................................... [–76,300 ] [–76,300 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
867 

Navy requested transfer to APN line 47 ................................................ [–24,000 ] [–24,000 ] Navy requested transfer to APN line 62 ................................................ [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] Navy requested transfer to line 83 ........................................................ [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

099 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ................................................................... 189,919 189,919 154,919 –19,000 170,919 

Technology Development late contract award ........................................ [–35,000 ] [–19,000 ] 

100 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) ..................................... 688,146 688,146 568,146 –12,000 676,146 

HMS capability enhancements unjustified request ................................ [–120,000 ] [–60,000 ] Management services funding growth ................................................... [–3,000 ] Transfer from OP,A line 39 for GMR correction of deficiencies ............ [51,000 ] 

101 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING .................................. 223,283 223,283 223,283 223,283 102 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................................................... 884 884 884 884 103 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ........................................................................ 47,635 47,635 29,635 –18,000 29,635 

Defer Integration on Joint Strike Fighter ................................................ [–18,000 ] [–18,000 ] 

104 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ 46,705 46,705 46,705 46,705 

105 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM ................................................................................................ 41,142 41,142 41,142 41,142 106 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 24,898 24,898 24,898 24,898 107 0604404N FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM ................................... 121,150 121,150 51,150 –45,450 75,700 

Delay to Technology Development contract award ................................. [–70,000 ] [–45,450 ] 

108 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ............................................................... 60,790 60,790 60,790 60,790 

108A 0604XXXN AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR .................................................................. 166,568 166,568 166,568 166,568 

109 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 100,591 100,591 95,671 –4,920 95,671 

TB–33 program cancellation .................................................................. [–4,920 ] [–4,920 ] 

110 0604504N AIR CONTROL ................................................................................................... 5,521 5,521 5,521 5,521 111 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 45,445 45,445 45,445 45,445 

112 0604518N COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION ................................................. 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 113 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN ............................................................................................. 97,235 107,235 97,235 97,235 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

114 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ....................................................... 48,466 48,466 48,466 48,466 

115 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E ........................................................ 161,099 161,099 98,099 –40,000 121,099 

Ship-to-Shore Connector--contract award delay .................................... [–63,000 ] [–40,000 ] 

116 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES ......................................................... 3,848 3,848 3,848 3,848 117 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ 3,933 3,933 3,933 3,933 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
868 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

118 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 32,592 32,592 32,592 32,592 119 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 9,960 9,960 9,960 9,960 120 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS .......................... 12,992 12,992 12,992 12,992 121 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS ................................................................ 7,506 7,506 7,506 7,506 122 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) ..................................................... 71,222 71,222 71,222 71,222 123 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ..................................................... 6,631 6,631 6,631 6,631 124 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ................................................ 184,095 184,095 184,095 184,095 125 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ............................................................................ 2,217 2,217 2,217 2,217 126 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 12,984 12,984 12,984 12,984 127 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM .................................................................................... 50,178 50,178 50,178 –10,800 39,378 

Mode 5 program delay ............................................................................ [–10,800 ] 

128 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ................................................................. 670,723 670,723 651,786 –18,937 651,786 

Block IV development ahead of need ..................................................... [–18,937 ] [–18,937 ] 

129 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) ............................................................................ 677,486 677,486 658,549 –18,937 658,549 

Block IV development ahead of need ..................................................... [–18,937 ] [–18,937 ] 

130 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 27,461 27,461 19,461 –8,000 19,461 

Prgram underexecution ........................................................................... [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] 

131 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 58,764 58,764 29,764 –29,000 29,764 

Reduction to fourth quarter contract awards ........................................ [–29,000 ] [–29,000 ] 

132 0605018N NAVY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (N-IMHRS) .......... 55,050 55,050 55,050 55,050 133 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ................................................................................................... 629,461 629,461 629,461 –5,000 624,461 

Management services funding growth ................................................... [–5,000 ] 

135 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 118,395 118,395 118,395 –10,000 108,395 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

136 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ................................................... 622,713 622,713 608,713 –14,000 608,713 

Increment 3–-development ahead of need ............................................ [–14,000 ] [–14,000 ] 

138 0204202N DDG–1000 ........................................................................................................ 261,604 261,604 261,604 –4,000 257,604 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
869 

Government technical services growth ................................................... [–4,000 ] 

139 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ................................................................ 979 979 979 979 141 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ................................................................... 31,740 31,740 31,740 31,740 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 6,475,528 6,485,528 5,959,434 –388,655 6,086,873 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

142 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 28,318 28,318 28,318 28,318 

143 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 44,700 44,700 44,700 44,700 144 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 37,957 37,957 37,957 37,957 145 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ............................ 2,970 2,970 2,970 2,970 146 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ...................................................... 23,454 23,454 17,454 –6,000 17,454 

Reduction to growth ............................................................................... [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] 

147 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ........................................................................ 47,127 47,127 47,127 47,127 

148 0605502N SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH ....................................................... 10 10 10 10 149 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ............................................................... 571 571 571 571 150 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ................................. 68,301 68,301 58,301 –10,000 58,301 

OASUW--defer new start ......................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

151 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,277 3,277 3,277 3,277 152 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT ......................................... 73,917 73,917 73,917 73,917 153 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ............................................................. 136,531 136,531 136,531 136,531 154 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 335,367 335,367 335,367 335,367 155 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY .......................................... 16,634 16,634 16,634 16,634 156 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT ............................ 4,228 4,228 4,228 4,228 157 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT ........................................... 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 158 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ...................................................... 25,655 25,655 25,655 25,655159 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 2,764 2,764 2,764 2,764 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 859,423 859,423 843,423 –16,000 843,423 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

164 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND 

PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

198,298 198,298 198,298 198,298 

165 0604717M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ................................................. 400 400 400 400 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
870 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

166 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 167 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ............................................. 88,873 88,873 88,873 88,873 168 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ........................................................ 33,553 33,553 33,553 33,553 169 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 6,360 6,360 6,360 6,360 170 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................... 23,208 23,208 23,208 23,208 171 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) ........................................................... 30,021 30,021 30,021 30,021 172 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ......................................................................................... 151,030 151,030 151,030 –5,869 145,161 

Radar upgrade program delay ............................................................... [–5,869 ] 

173 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS .............................................................................................. 6,696 6,696 6,696 6,696 

174 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ....................................................... 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 175 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 3,377 3,377 3,377 3,377 176 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) ................. 8,819 8,819 8,819 8,819 177 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............................................................. 21,259 21,259 21,259 21,259 

178 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) ................... 5,214 5,214 5,214 5,214 179 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 42,244 42,244 42,244 42,244 180 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT ...................................................................... 1,447 1,447 1,447 1,447 181 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT ......................................... 18,142 18,142 18,142 18,142 182 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ....................................................................................... 11,147 11,147 11,147 11,147 183 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ...................................................................................... 69,224 69,224 69,224 69,224 184 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ............................................... 22,010 22,010 22,010 22,010 185 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP .................................................................................................. 39,288 39,288 39,288 39,288 186 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................ 123,012 110,412 123,012 –22,589 100,423 

Cancelation of Multi-Purpose Bomb Racks Program ............................. [–22,600 ] [–22,589 ] Electrophotonic Component Capability Development ............................. [10,000 ] 

187 0205658N NAVY SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ........................................................... 1,957 1,957 1,957 1,957 188 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ...................................................... 82,705 82,705 82,705 82,705

189 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .................................................. 320,864 320,864 320,864 320,864 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
871 

190 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS ................... 209,396 209,396 184,396 –25,000 184,396 

Amphibious Combat Vehicle (non-add) Excess funds for Marine Personnel Carrier & AAV Upgrade .................. [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

191 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ................................................. 45,172 45,172 45,172 –18,100 27,072 

Program execution .................................................................................. [–18,100 ] 

192 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) ......................... 14,101 14,101 14,101 14,101 193 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 

194 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 2,913 2,913 2,913 2,913 195 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ................................................................... 4,108 4,108 4,108 4,108 200 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ............................................................ 263,712 263,712 263,712 263,712 201 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) ............... 12,906 12,906 24,906 12,000 24,906 

Transfer from CANES (OPN 68) per USN request .................................. [12,000 ] [12,000 ] 

202 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 25,229 25,229 25,229 25,229 203 0303150M WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................... 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 204 0303238N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)—MIP .... 6,602 6,602 6,602 6,602 206 0305149N COBRA JUDY ..................................................................................................... 40,605 40,605 40,605 40,605 207 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC) ................... 904 904 904 904 208 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES ..................................... 4,099 4,099 4,099 4,099 209 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 9,353 19,353 9,353 9,353

TACAIR-Launched UAS Capability Development ..................................... [10,000 ] 

210 0305206N AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .......................................................... 3,000 0 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [3,000 ] 

212 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 23,785 23,785 23,785 23,785 213 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 25,487 25,487 25,487 25,487 214 0305220N RQ–4 UAV ......................................................................................................... 548,482 548,482 548,482 548,482 

215 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ........................................................................................................ 108,248 108,248 3,648 108,248 

ECP for SOCOM urgent needs statement--transfer to Title XV ............. [–104,600 ] 

216 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 979 979 979 979 217 0305233N RQ–7 UAV ......................................................................................................... 872 872 872 872 219 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .................................................... 22,698 22,698 22,698 –1,300 21,398 

Excess support funding .......................................................................... [–1,300 ] 

220 0305237N MEDIUM RANGE MARITIME UAS ....................................................................... 15,000 15,000 33,823 15,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
872 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Transfer from line 16 ............................................................................. [18,823 ] 

221 0305239M RQ–21A ............................................................................................................ 26,301 26,301 21,301 –2,100 24,201 

Program delays ....................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–2,100 ] 

223 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT ............................................................ 8,292 8,292 8,292 8,292224 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 21,609 21,609 21,609 21,609 226 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 54,031 59,031 54,031 54,031 

Industrial Preparedness .......................................................................... [5,000 ] 

227 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ............................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

227A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 1,308,608 1,308,608 1,306,945 –1,663 1,306,945 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................. [–1,663 ] [–1,663 ] Aviation Component Development .......................................................... [10,000 ] Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–20,000 ] UAS Development .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 4,131,044 4,136,444 4,025,604 –64,621 4,066,423 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY .................... 17,956,431 18,008,131 17,161,659 –574,291 17,382,140 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 364,328 364,328 364,328 364,328 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 140,273 147,273 140,273 140,273 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [7,000 ] 

003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES .................................................. 14,258 14,258 14,258 14,258 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 518,859 525,859 518,859 518,859 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS ........................................................................................................ 136,230 136,230 136,230 136,230 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
873 

005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES .............................................................. 147,628 147,628 147,628 147,628 006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH .................................................. 86,663 88,863 86,663 86,663 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [2,200 ] 

007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ................................................................................. 207,508 209,508 207,508 207,508 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [2,000 ] 

008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................................................... 134,787 134,787 134,787 134,787 

009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................................ 115,285 118,285 115,285 115,285 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [3,000 ] 

010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 60,692 60,692 60,692 60,692 

011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY .................................................................... 111,156 111,156 111,156 111,156 012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS ....................................... 127,866 127,866 127,866 127,866 013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ..................................................................... 54,059 54,059 54,059 54,059 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,181,874 1,189,074 1,181,874 1,181,874 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS .............................................. 39,738 49,738 49,738 8,500 48,238 

Program Increase—Metals Affordability Initiative ................................. [10,000 ] [10,000 ] [8,500 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) ........................................... 5,780 5,780 5,780 5,780 016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ................................................................... 53,075 53,075 53,075 53,075 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ............................................................. 67,474 67,474 67,474 67,474 

018A 0603XXXF FUELS ............................................................................................................... 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 

018B 0603XXXF POWER TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................................... 5,747 5,747 5,747 5,747 018C 0603XXXF PROPULSION ..................................................................................................... 80,833 80,833 80,833 80,833 018D 0603XXXF ROCKET PROPULSION ....................................................................................... 27,603 27,603 27,603 27,603 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY ................................................................ 22,268 22,268 22,268 22,268 

020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 74,636 74,636 74,636 74,636 021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) ................................................. 13,555 13,555 13,555 13,555 022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................. 25,319 25,319 25,319 25,319 023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 54,042 54,042 34,042 –8,500 45,542 

High Velocity Penetrating Weapon—ahead of need .............................. [–20,000 ] [–8,500 ] 

024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 28,683 28,683 28,683 28,683 

025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...................................................... 40,103 40,103 40,103 40,103 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
874 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................. 38,656 42,656 38,656 38,656 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [4,000 ] 

027 0603924F HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ............................. 1,122 1,122 1,122 1,122 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 585,404 599,404 575,404 585,404 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 4,013 4,013 4,013 4,013 029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 

031 0603430F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) .............................................................. 421,687 279,487 421,687 –20,000 401,687 

Excess to need—poor justification ........................................................ [–20,000 ] Transfer to RDAF–49 .............................................................................. [–142,200 ] 

032 0603432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ............................................................................ 122,991 122,991 122,991 –20,000 102,991 

Development schedule delay .................................................................. [–20,000 ] 

033 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................ 45,755 45,755 45,755 45,755 

034 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 38,496 38,496 38,496 38,496 

035 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 4,424 4,424 4,424 4,424036 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ..................................................... 642 642 642 642 037 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) .............................................................. 9,819 9,819 9,819 –2,500 7,319 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–2,500 ] 

038 0603850F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE .................................................................. 20,046 20,046 20,046 20,046 

039 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ........................................................... 67,202 87,202 72,202 2,500 69,702 

ICBM ........................................................................................................ [–15,000 ] Program increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] [20,000 ] [2,500 ] 

040 0603854F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM RDT&E (SPACE) ................................................. 12,804 12,804 12,804 12,804 041 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION .................................................................................. 2,075 2,075 2,075 2,075 042 0603860F JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS .................................... 20,112 20,112 20,112 20,112 043 0604015F NEXT GENERATION BOMBER ............................................................................ 197,023 197,023 197,023 197,023 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
875 

044 0604283F BATTLE MGMT COM & CTRL SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ..................................... 60,250 60,250 31,250 –29,000 31,250 

3DELRR Contract Delays ......................................................................... [–29,000 ] [–29,000 ] 

045 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER .................................................................................. 2,553 11,553 2,553 2,553 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [9,000 ] 

046 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM .. 38,248 38,248 38,248 –5,000 33,248 

Program reduction .................................................................................. [–5,000 ] 

047 0604330F JOINT DUAL ROLE AIR DOMINANCE MISSILE .................................................... 29,759 29,759 29,759 29,759 

048 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION .................................................. 24,217 24,217 24,217 24,217 049 0604436F NEXT-GENERATION MILSATCOM TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................ 142,200 0 

Transfer from RDAF-031 ......................................................................... [142,200 ] 

050 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 24,467 24,467 24,467 24,467 053 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ............................................................... 86,543 106,543 86,543 86,543 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] 

054 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................................................... 2,773 2,773 2,773 2,773 

055 0305178F NATIONAL POLAR-ORBITING OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE SYSTEM (NPOESS). 444,900 444,900 444,900 –401,900 43,000 

DWSS program termination .................................................................... [–444,900 ] Termination liability ................................................................................ [43,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 1,684,385 1,733,385 1,660,385 –475,900 1,208,485 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

056 0603840F GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS) ............................................................... 5,680 5,680 5,680 5,680 057 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT ......................................................................... 18,538 18,538 18,538 18,538 058 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING ........................................... 21,780 21,780 21,780 21,780 059 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 26,880 26,880 16,880 –10,000 16,880 

MALD-J Increment 2–-Technology Development Contract Delay ............ [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

061 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ......................................................... 52,355 52,355 48,105 –4,250 48,105 

CLIP--Contract Delays ............................................................................. [–1,250 ] [–1,250 ] STRATCOM DNC2 Contract Delays .......................................................... [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

062 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 51 51 51 51 063 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ........................................................................ 132,891 132,891 132,891 132,891 

064 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 31,913 31,913 31,913 31,913 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
876 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

065 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ........................................................ 273,689 273,689 273,689 –32,600 241,089 

Space Based Space Surveillance excess to need .................................. [–12,600 ] Space Fence—poor justification ............................................................ [–20,000 ] Space Surveillance Telescope ................................................................. [–6,000 ] Space Surveillance Telescope military utility assessment ..................... [6,000 ] 

066 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ...................................................................... 47,100 47,100 39,000 –6,100 41,000 

AEA SoS--Contract Delays ...................................................................... [–4,600 ] [–2,600 ] Electronic Attack Pod--Delayed Start ..................................................... [–3,500 ] [–3,500 ] 

067 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD .................................... 621,629 641,629 621,629 621,629 

Data exploitation ..................................................................................... [–15,000 ] Data explotation ...................................................................................... [15,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] 

069 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 10,055 10,055 6,055 –2,300 7,755 

Universal Armament Interface Contract Delay ....................................... [–4,000 ] [–2,300 ] 

070 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS ................................................................................................. 2,427 2,427 2,427 2,427 

071 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................................................. 11,878 11,878 3,920 –3,900 7,978 

Airfield Damage Repair--Ahead of Need ................................................ [–4,058 ] BEAR--Ahead of Need ............................................................................. [–3,900 ] [–3,900 ] 

073 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 11,280 11,280 9,280 –2,000 9,280 

Integrated Aircrew Ensemble--Contract Award Delays .......................... [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

074 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ............................................................................. 28,106 28,106 8,106 –20,000 8,106 

Air Combat Training Systems (P5) Upgrades--Contract Delay .............. [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] Joint Threat Emitter Increment 2–-Rephased Program ......................... [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

075 0604740F INTEGRATED COMMAND & CONTROL APPLICATIONS (IC2A) ............................ 10 10 10 10 076 0604750F INTELLIGENCE EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 995 995 995 995 

077 0604800F JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) ............................................................................ 1,387,926 1,388,926 1,387,926 1,387,926 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
877 

Establish Protocols for Joint Strike Fighter Lead-Free Electronic Components. [1,000 ] 

078 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ........................................................... 158,477 158,477 158,477 –10,000 148,477 

Support Equipment—contract savings .................................................. [–10,000 ] 

079 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE) ........................ 20,028 20,028 20,028 –5,000 15,028 

Program underexecution due to schedule delay .................................... [–5,000 ] 

080 0605221F NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT ........................................... 877,084 849,884 742,084 877,084 

Align funding to signed KC–46A contract ............................................. [–127,100 ] Excess to Requirement ........................................................................... [–7,900 ] Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–27,200 ] 

081 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION ..................................................................... 94,113 11,000 600 –83,113 11,000 

Budget Adjustment per Air Force Request to APAF–63 ......................... [–10,400 ] [–10,400 ] [–10,400 ] Budget Adjustment per Air Force Request to APAF–73 ......................... [–54,600 ] [–54,600 ] [–54,600 ] Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–18,113 ] [–18,113 ] [–18,113 ] Transfer to HC–130 modifications (APAF 75) per USAF request ........... [–10,400 ] 

083 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E .............................................................................. 27,071 27,071 22,071 –5,000 22,071 

Contract Savings .................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

085 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 93,867 93,867 93,867 93,867 

086 0207100F LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE (LAAR) SQUADRONS ....................... 23,721 23,721 23,721 –10,000 13,721 

Program reduction .................................................................................. [–10,000 ] 

088 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .................................................................... 39,826 39,826 25,826 –10,000 29,826 

Block 40/50 Mission Training Center--Excess to need .......................... [–14,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

089 0401138F JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT (JCA) .......................................................................... 27,089 27,089 27,089 27,089 

090 0401318F CV–22 ............................................................................................................... 20,723 20,723 10,723 –7,500 13,223 

Contract Delay ........................................................................................ [–10,000 ] [–7,500 ] 

091 0401845F AIRBORNE SENIOR LEADER C3 (SLC3S) .......................................................... 12,535 12,535 –12,535 0

Program Termination .............................................................................. [–12,535 ] [–12,535 ] 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 4,079,717 3,990,404 3,753,361 –224,298 3,855,419 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

092 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 22,420 22,420 22,420 22,420 

093 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 62,206 62,206 62,206 62,206 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
878 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

094 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE .............................................................................. 27,579 27,579 27,579 27,579 096 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ..................................................... 17,767 17,767 17,767 17,767 097 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 654,475 763,475 704,475 50,000 704,475 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [109,000 ] [50,000 ] [50,000 ] 

098 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ............................................... 158,096 33,596 158,096 158,096

Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–124,500 ] 

099 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ........................................................................... 47,926 47,926 47,926 47,926 

100 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION 

SUPPORT.

44,547 44,547 44,547 44,547 

101 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ........................ 27,953 27,953 27,953 27,953 102 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE ........................................ 13,953 13,953 13,953 13,953 103 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..................................................... 31,966 31,966 31,966 31,966104 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................ 1,510 1,510 1,510 1,510 106 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 3,798 3,798 3,798 3,798 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 1,114,196 1,098,696 1,164,196 50,000 1,164,196 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

107 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT .......... 390,889 390,889 366,889 –24,000 366,889 

Slow execution ........................................................................................ [–24,000 ] [–24,000 ] 

108 0604263F COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT PLATFORM ................................................ 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 109 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) .............................. 91,866 91,866 91,866 91,866 110 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY ............................................ 35,467 35,467 35,467 35,467 112 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 133,261 133,261 133,261 –39,265 93,996 

1760 IWBU contract delays .................................................................... [–10,000 ] EHF contract delays ................................................................................ [–13,000 ] IFF Mode S/5 Development contract delays ........................................... [–5,000 ] SR2 excess to requirement ..................................................................... [–11,265 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
879 

113 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ......................................................... 803 803 803 803 114 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 33,011 33,011 33,011 33,011 115 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................. 340,819 340,819 226,836 –60,500 280,319 

Delay in EHF communications development due to FAB-T delay .......... [–113,983 ] [–60,500 ] 

116 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM .............................................. 23,072 23,072 23,072 23,072 117 0101314F NIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM .............................................................................. 5,421 5,421 –3,421 2,000 

Program Termination .............................................................................. [–5,421 ] [–3,421 ] 

119 0102325F ATMOSPHERIC EARLY WARNING SYSTEM ......................................................... 4,485 4,485 4,485 –4,485 0 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–4,485 ] 

120 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 12,672 12,672 12,672 –6,000 6,672 

BCS-F excess to requirement ................................................................. [–6,000 ] 

121 0102823F STRATEGIC AEROSPACE INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES ........................... 14 14 14 14 122 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION 

FUND.

19,934 39,934 19,934 19,934 

Mixed Conventional Load Capacity for Bomber Aircraft ........................ [20,000 ] 

123 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 146,824 146,824 126,824 –20,000 126,824 

Contract Delays ....................................................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

125 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 11,051 11,051 11,051 11,051 

126 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 143,869 143,869 131,069 –12,800 131,069 

SLEP Contract Delay ............................................................................... [–12,800 ] [–12,800 ] 

127 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 207,531 207,531 194,831 –12,700 194,831 

ADCP--Excess to Requirement ................................................................ [–12,700 ] [–12,700 ] 

128 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ............................................................. 13,253 13,253 13,253 13,253 

129 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 718,432 718,432 511,432 –147,000 571,432 

Program Growth ...................................................................................... [–67,000 ] [–147,000 ] Provide funds that Air Force can execute in FY12 ................................ [–140,000 ] 

130 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 47,841 47,841 –37,874 9,967 

Block IV Development--Ahead of need ................................................... [–47,841 ] [–37,874 ] 

131 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 8,023 8,023 8,023 8,023 

132 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 77,830 77,830 77,830 77,830 133 0207170F JOINT HELMET MOUNTED CUEING SYSTEM (JHMCS) ....................................... 1,436 1,436 1,436 1,436 134 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ................................................................... 2,292 2,292 2,292 2,292 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
880 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

135 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE .................................................................... 927 927 927 927 136 0207247F AF TENCAP ....................................................................................................... 20,727 20,727 20,727 20,727 137 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ................................................. 3,128 3,128 3,128 3,128 138 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................................................ 18,509 18,509 18,509 18,509 139 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 182,967 182,967 172,967 –10,000 172,967 

Excess to Requirement ........................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

141 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) ....................................... 5,796 5,796 5,796 5,796 142 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ...................................................... 121,880 121,880 121,880 121,880 143 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ...................................................... 3,954 3,954 3,954 3,954 144 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) ................................... 135,961 135,961 91,961 –17,300 118,661 

DRAGON--Contract Delays ...................................................................... [–24,000 ] NGIFF--Contract Delays ........................................................................... [–20,000 ] Poor program execution .......................................................................... [–17,300 ] 

145 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 8,309 8,309 8,309 8,309 146 0207423F ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ......................................................... 90,083 90,083 44,883 –45,200 44,883 

Common Processing Environment--Schedule Delays ............................. [–40,000 ] [–40,000 ] JTRS Integration and Engineering Support--Schedule Delays ............... [–5,200 ] [–5,200 ] 

148 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES ............................................. 5,428 5,428 5,428 5,428 149 0207438F THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I ..................................................... 15,528 15,528 15,528 15,528 

150 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD ............................................................... 15,978 15,978 9,678 –6,300 9,678 

JETS Contract Delays .............................................................................. [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] VCS--Program Termination and Restructure .......................................... [–4,300 ] [–4,300 ] 

152 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ............................................................................. 1,536 1,536 1,536 1,536 

153 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION ............................................. 18,102 18,102 18,102 18,102 154 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS) ................... 121,610 121,610 88,610 121,610 

Unjustified Request Based on Program Restructure ............................. [–33,000 ] 

155 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ...................................................................................................... 18,599 18,599 18,599 18,599 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
881 

156 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION .................................................................. 23,091 23,091 23,091 23,091 157 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ......................................................... 5,779 5,779 5,779 5,779 158 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ......................................................... 5,264 5,264 3,264 –2,000 3,264 

Unjustified growth .................................................................................. [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] 

159 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 69,918 69,918 63,418 –6,500 63,418 

CAF Increment IV--Critical Change Delay .............................................. [–6,500 ] [–6,500 ] 

160 0208021F INFORMATION WARFARE SUPPORT ................................................................... 2,322 2,322 2,322 2,322 

161 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 702 702 702 702 168 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE ................................................................. 11,866 11,866 8,866 –3,000 8,866 

Program underexecution due to schedule delays ................................... [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

169 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) .............................. 5,845 5,845 5,845 –1,000 4,845 

Secure, Survivable Communications delayed program start ................. [–1,000 ] 

170 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 43,811 43,811 43,811 43,811 171 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 101,788 101,788 92,788 –9,000 92,788 

Delay due to protest ............................................................................... [–9,000 ] [–9,000 ] 

172 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 449 449 449 449 173 0303150F GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................................... 3,854 3,854 3,854 3,854 175 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................................................... 238,729 238,729 188,729 –42,000 196,729 

Transfer to FAB-T alternative line 175a ................................................ [–50,000 ] [–42,000 ] 

175A 0303XXXF FAB-T ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................... 50,000 42,000 42,000 

Transfer from FAB-T line 175 ................................................................. [50,000 ] [42,000 ] 

177 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE ........................................................................ –13,500 –13,500 –13,500 

Contract/Program Delays ........................................................................ [–13,500 ] [–13,500 ] 

177A 0304XXXF RC–135 ............................................................................................................ 34,744 34,744 34,744 34,744 

177B 0304XXXF COMMON DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 87,004 87,004 87,004 87,004 

180 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ................................................... 4,604 4,604 4,604 4,604 181 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 182 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ............................................................................ 282 282 282 282 183 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) .......................................................... 18,337 18,337 18,337 18,337 184 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................................................... 31,084 31,084 31,084 31,084 185 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) ............ 63,367 63,367 9,867 –42,000 21,367 

D--RAPCON Contract Delay ..................................................................... [–53,500 ] [–42,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
882 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

186 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS .............................................................................................. 50,620 50,620 45,620 –5,000 45,620 

QF–16–-Excess to Need .......................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

189 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 366 366 366 366 190 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ........................................ 39 39 39 39 191 0305159F ENTERPRISE QUERY & CORRELATION .............................................................. 10,000 0 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................. [–10,000 ] Enterprise query & correlation ................................................................ [20,000 ] 

192 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) ........... 133,601 133,601 42,601 133,601 

Contract delay ......................................................................................... [–91,000 ] 

193 0305165F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE AND CONTROL SEGMENTS) 17,893 17,893 17,893 17,893 195 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER ..................................... 196,254 196,254 196,254 –7,500 188,754 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–7,500 ] 

196 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER ............................................ 2,961 2,961 2,961 2,961 197 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................................................ 9,940 9,940 9,940 9,940 

198 0305193F INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) .......................... 1,271 1,271 1,271 1,271 200 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 52,425 52,425 15,925 –6,500 45,925 

Funded via reprogramming action ......................................................... [–6,500 ] [–6,500 ] Program reduction .................................................................................. [–30,000 ] 

201 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .......................................................... 106,877 106,877 99,677 –7,200 99,677 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–7,200 ] [–7,200 ] 

202 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 13,049 13,049 13,049 13,049 

203 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 90,724 90,724 85,724 –5,000 85,724 

Contract delays ....................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

204 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 14,112 14,112 11,642 –2,470 11,642 

Common Sensor Payload--Ahead of Need .............................................. [–2,470 ] [–2,470 ] 

205 0305220F RQ–4 UAV ........................................................................................................ 423,462 423,462 383,462 423,462 

Contract delays ....................................................................................... [–40,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
883 

206 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING ............................................ 7,348 7,348 7,348 7,348 207 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .................................................................................. 463,081 463,081 463,081 –5,000 458,081 

GPS III CIP—poor justification ............................................................... [–5,000 ] 

208 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM .................................................................................. 118,950 118,950 83,950 –37,500 81,450 

JMS program restructure ........................................................................ [–35,000 ] [–37,500 ] 

209 0305887F INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION WARFARE ...................................... 14,736 14,736 14,736 14,736 210 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) ............................................................... 81,989 81,989 81,989 81,989 

212 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS ................................................... 31,956 31,956 31,956 31,956213 0307141F INFORMATION OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & TOOL DEVELOPMENT. 23,931 23,931 23,931 23,931 

214 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ...................................................................... 1,663 1,663 1,663 1,663 

215 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................................................. 24,509 24,509 6,509 –18,000 6,509 

Contract Delays ....................................................................................... [–18,000 ] [–18,000 ] 

216 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) .......................................................................... 24,941 24,941 12,941 –12,000 12,941 

RERP Program Rephased ........................................................................ [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

217 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ......................................................................................... 128,169 128,169 94,269 –33,900 94,269 

Contract Delays ....................................................................................... [–33,900 ] [–33,900 ] 

218 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 39,537 39,537 39,537 39,537 

219 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) ....................................... 7,438 7,438 7,438 7,438 220 0401139F LIGHT MOBILITY AIRCRAFT (LIMA) ................................................................... 1,308 1,308 –1,308 0 

Funded in Fiscal Year 2011 ................................................................... [–1,308 ] [–1,308 ] 

221 0401218F KC–135S ........................................................................................................... 6,161 6,161 6,161 6,161 

222 0401219F KC–10S ............................................................................................................. 30,868 30,868 30,868 30,868 223 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ...................................................................... 82,591 82,591 37,591 –40,000 42,591 

VC–25A--Funding Ahead of Need ........................................................... [–45,000 ] [–40,000 ] 

225 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ............................................................ 7,118 7,118 5,218 –1,900 5,218 

Line of Sight--Contract Delay ................................................................. [–1,900 ] [–1,900 ] 

226 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 1,531 1,531 1,531 1,531 

228 0708012F LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 944 944 944 944 229 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) .............................................. 140,284 140,284 140,284 140,284 

230 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 10,990 10,990 10,990 10,990 232 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................. 322 322 322 322 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
884 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

233 0804757F JOINT NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER ................................................................. 11 11 11 11 235 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 113 113 113 113 236 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY ........................................................... 2,483 2,483 2,483 2,483 237 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM ................................................................ 1,508 1,508 1,508 1,508 238 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................... 8,041 8,041 1,041 –7,000 1,041 

Contract Delays ....................................................................................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

239 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .................................................. 928 928 928 928 240 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE ....................................................... 12,118 12,118 12,118 12,118 

241 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................. 101,317 101,317 76,317 –25,000 76,317 

DEAMS--Excess to Requirement ............................................................. [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

242 0902998F MANAGEMENT HQ—ADP SUPPORT (AF) .......................................................... 299 299 299 299 

242A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 12,063,140 12,088,140 11,829,329 –233,811 11,829,329 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................. [–233,811 ] [–233,811 ] Defense Reconnaissance Support Activites ............................................ [25,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 18,573,266 18,612,845 17,318,853 –972,934 17,600,332 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF ........................ 27,737,701 27,749,667 26,172,932 –1,623,132 26,114,569 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE .................................................................. 47,737 47,737 47,737 47,737 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 290,773 290,773 290,773 290,773 003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................................................................... 14,731 14,731 14,731 –7,000 7,731 

Reduction to new starts ......................................................................... [–7,000 ] 

005 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE ....................................... 37,870 37,870 37,870 37,870 006 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 101,591 86,591 86,591 –15,000 86,591 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
885 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 52,617 52,617 52,617 52,617 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 545,319 530,319 530,319 –22,000 523,319 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 21,592 21,592 20,592 –1,000 20,592 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–1,000 ] [–1,000 ] 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................... 110,000 110,000 110,000 –15,000 95,000 

Unsustained funding .............................................................................. [–15,000 ] 

010 0602228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (HBCU) SCIENCE .......... 25,245 15,245 15,245 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] Realignment of Funds for Proper Oversight and Execution ................... [15,245 ] [15,245 ] 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ................................................. 37,916 37,916 37,916 37,916 012 0602250D8Z SYSTEMS 2020 APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................ 4,381 4,381 4,381 –4,381 0 

Duplication of effort ............................................................................... [–4,381 ] 

013 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 400,499 350,499 400,499 –46,374 354,125 

Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–50,000 ] [–46,374 ] 

014 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .................................................................... 49,365 49,365 49,365 49,365 

015 0602305E MACHINE INTELLIGENCE ................................................................................... 61,351 61,351 61,351 –9,075 52,276 

Unsustained growth ................................................................................ [–9,075 ] 

016 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ...................................................................... 30,421 30,421 30,421 30,421 

017 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 219,873 224,873 219,873 219,873

Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

018 0602663D8Z DATA TO DECISIONS APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 9,235 5,235 5,235 –5,000 4,235 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

019 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ........................................................................... 9,735 9,735 4,735 –5,000 4,735 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

020 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH. 14,923 10,923 10,923 –6,000 8,923 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] [–6,000 ] 

021 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 206,422 206,422 206,422 –4,000 202,422 

Reduction to new starts ......................................................................... [–4,000 ] 

022 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 237,837 237,837 237,837 –15,000 222,837 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
886 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

023 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 215,178 215,178 215,178 215,178 

024 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES ............................ 196,954 201,954 186,501 196,954 

Due to slow execution ............................................................................. [–10,453 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

025 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 26,591 26,591 26,591 26,591 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,852,273 1,829,518 1,827,820 –95,585 1,756,688 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (ATD) 

027 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 24,771 24,771 20,271 –9,000 15,771 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–4,500 ] [–9,000 ] 

028 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 45,028 45,028 45,028 45,028 

029 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT ............................................ 77,019 100,219 77,019 77,019 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [23,200 ] 

030 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND 

DEFEAT.

283,073 283,073 271,123 283,073 

Due to slow execution ............................................................................. [–11,950 ] 

031 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 75,003 75,003 75,003 75,003 032 0603200D8Z JOINT ADVANCED CONCEPTS ............................................................................ 7,903 7,903 7,903 –1,100 6,803 

Unsustained growth ................................................................................ [–1,100 ] 

033 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .............................. 20,372 20,372 20,372 20,372 034 0603250D8Z SYSTEMS 2020 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............................... 4,381 4,381 4,381 –4,381 0 

Lack of transition plan ........................................................................... [–4,381 ] 

035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY. 998 998 998 998 

036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 61,458 61,458 61,458 61,458037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS .................................................................... 98,878 98,878 98,878 98,878 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
887 

038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 97,541 97,541 97,541 97,541 039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 229,235 229,235 229,235 229,235 040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 7,287 7,287 7,287 7,287 041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................................ 187,707 167,707 177,707 –11,000 176,707 

Unjustified Growth .................................................................................. [–20,000 ] [–10,000 ] [–11,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ................................................ 23,890 23,890 23,890 23,890

043 0603663D8Z DATA TO DECISIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ....................... 9,235 5,235 5,235 –5,000 4,235 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

044 0603665D8Z BIOMETRICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 10,762 10,762 10,762 10,762 045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH ........................................................ 10,709 10,709 5,709 –5,000 5,709 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED 

DEVELOPMENT.

18,179 14,179 14,179 –5,000 13,179 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...... 17,888 19,888 47,888 30,000 47,888 

Defense Alternative Energy ..................................................................... [2,000 ] Program Increase- Industrial Base Innovation Fund program .............. [30,000 ] [30,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 26,972 26,972 13,972 26,972 

Cargo airship demonstration .................................................................. [2,000 ] Pelican ..................................................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

049 0603711D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM/AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS ...................................... 9,756 9,756 9,756 9,756 050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 23,887 38,887 23,887 23,887 

Secure Microelectronics .......................................................................... [15,000 ] 

051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY ......................... 41,976 41,976 35,976 –12,000 29,976 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–6,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM ........................................ 66,409 77,159 66,409 66,409 

Offshore Range Environmental Baseline Assessment ............................ [1,750 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] Radiological Contamination Research .................................................... [4,000 ] 

053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT .................. 91,132 83,132 61,132 –30,000 61,132 

90nm Next Generation Foundry .............................................................. [–30,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
888 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Microelectronics Technlogy Development and Support .......................... [3,000 ] Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–11,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ........................................................................ 10,547 10,547 10,547 10,547 

055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES ....................................................... 160,286 160,286 160,286 –10,000 150,286 

Reduction to new starts ......................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

058 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ................................. 296,537 246,537 296,537 –34,931 261,606 

CCC-01 unsustained growth .................................................................. [–7,490 ] CCC-02 unsustained growth .................................................................. [–3,850 ] CCC-CLS unsustained growth ................................................................ [–10,591 ] Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–50,000 ] Reduction to new starts ......................................................................... [–13,000 ] 

059 0603765E CLASSIFIED DARPA PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 107,226 107,226 107,226 107,226 

060 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 235,245 235,245 235,245 –26,742 208,503 

NET-01 unsustained growth ................................................................... [–11,742 ] Reduction to new starts ......................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

061 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 271,802 271,802 271,802 271,802 

061A 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM .......................................................... 200,000 200,000 200,000 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [200,000 ] [200,000 ] 

063 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................. 13,579 13,579 13,579 13,579 064 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ................................................................ 30,424 30,424 30,424 30,424 

065 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS .............................................................. 89,925 89,925 79,925 –29,160 60,765 

P826/P828 excessive growth .................................................................. [–25,000 ] P832 ........................................................................................................ [–4,160 ] Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

066 0603828D8Z JOINT EXPERIMENTATION .................................................................................. 58,130 58,130 48,130 –19,000 39,130 

Program adjustment ............................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–19,000 ] 

067 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE ................................ 37,029 31,029 31,029 –6,000 31,029 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
889 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] [–6,000 ] 

068 0603901C DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH ........................................................................ 96,329 146,329 36,329 –46,329 50,000 

Program Decrease—ALTB ....................................................................... [–60,000 ] [–46,329 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [50,000 ] 

069 0603902C NEXT GENERATION AEGIS MISSILE ................................................................... 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 

070 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 99,593 99,593 99,593 99,593

Program Increase- Technology Transition Initiative ............................... [10,000 ] Technology Transition Initiative .............................................................. [–10,000 ] 

072 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT ......................................... 20,444 34,444 20,444 20,444 

Operational Energy Improvement Pilot Project ....................................... [4,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

073 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 7,788 7,788 7,788 –3,500 4,288 

Program reduction .................................................................................. [–3,500 ] 

074 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ..................... 35,242 40,242 30,242 –5,000 30,242 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

075 1160422BB AVIATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ................................................................... 837 837 837 837 076 1160472BB SOF INFORMATION AND BROADCAST SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 4,924 4,924 4,924 4,924 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (ATD) ......................... 3,270,792 3,298,742 3,321,342 –33,143 3,237,649 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

077 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E 

ADC&P.

36,798 36,798 36,798 –6,000 30,798 

Unexecutable growth ............................................................................... [–6,000 ] 

078 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 21,040 21,040 21,040 21,040 079 0603600D8Z WALKOFF ........................................................................................................... 112,142 112,142 112,142 112,142 080 0603709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM .............................................................................. 11,129 11,129 11,129 11,129 

081 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ................................................. 18,408 18,408 18,408 18,408082 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ................ 63,606 33,606 63,606 63,606 

Realignment to RDDW-082A ................................................................... [–30,000 ] 

082A 0603XXXD8Z INSTALLATION ENERGY TEST BED .................................................................... 47,000 0 

Installation Energy Test Bed Program Increase ..................................... [15,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
890 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Microgrid Pilot Program .......................................................................... [2,000 ] Realignment from RDDW-082 ................................................................. [30,000 ] 

083 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT .......................... 290,452 290,452 310,452 290,452 

THAAD production improvements ............................................................ [20,000 ] 

084 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT ....................... 1,161,001 1,261,001 1,161,001 1,161,001 

Program increase .................................................................................... [100,000 ] 

086 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 261,143 261,143 234,155 –47,988 213,155 

IBP schedule delay ................................................................................. [–12,000 ] INATS schedule delays ............................................................................ [–13,000 ] [–13,000 ] JPID program restructure ........................................................................ [–13,988 ] [–13,988 ] VAC FILO execution delays ...................................................................... [–9,000 ] 

087 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS ........................................................... 222,374 222,374 222,374 222,374 

088 0603888C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST & TARGETS ............................................... 1,071,039 1,071,039 1,022,039 –985,349 85,690 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–9,000 ] Program Decrease—Excess funds ......................................................... [–40,000 ] Transfer to lines 88a, 88b, and 89 ....................................................... [–985,349 ] 

088A 0603XXXC BMD TESTS ....................................................................................................... 488,382 488,382 

Transfer from line 88 ............................................................................. [488,382 ] 

088B 0603XXXC BMD TARGETS .................................................................................................. 454,999 454,999 

Transfer from line 88 ............................................................................. [454,999 ] 

089 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 373,563 373,563 373,563 41,968 415,531 

Transfer from line 88 ............................................................................. [41,968 ] 

090 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................................................. 296,554 296,554 296,554 296,554 

091 0603892C AEGIS BMD ....................................................................................................... 960,267 965,267 1,250,267 30,000 990,267 

AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense .............................................................. [5,000 ] SM–3 Block IB production improvements .............................................. [30,000 ] [30,000 ] Transfer from procurement to correct test failures ............................... [260,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
891 

092 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 96,353 96,353 96,353 96,353 093 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS .............................. 7,951 7,951 7,951 7,951 094 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI. 364,103 364,103 364,103 364,103 096 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ............................ 41,225 41,225 41,225 41,225 097 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) ................. 69,325 69,325 69,325 69,325 098 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................................................ 15,797 15,797 15,797 15,797 099 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ................................................................... 177,058 177,058 157,058 –20,000 157,058 

Program Decrease—Excess funds ......................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

101 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS .................................................................. 106,100 216,100 156,100 110,000 216,100 

Arrow System Improvement Program ...................................................... [20,000 ] [20,000 ] Arrow–3 interceptor development ........................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] David’s Sling development ..................................................................... [25,000 ] [25,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [110,000 ] [60,000 ] 

102 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ................................................................................ 14,996 14,996 14,996 14,996 

103 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ........................................................................................ 12,743 12,743 12,743 12,743 104 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM ......................................... 3,221 13,521 35,321 32,100 35,321 

Program increase—funding shortfall .................................................... [10,300 ] [32,100 ] [32,100 ] 

105 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) 

COMMON DEVELOPMENT.

25,120 25,120 25,120 25,120 

107 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH 

AND ENGINEERING.

10,309 10,309 8,309 –2,800 7,509 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–2,000 ] [–2,800 ] 

108 0604787D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION COMMAND (JSIC) .............................................. 13,024 13,024 8,024 13,024

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

109 0604828D8Z JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM ............................... 9,290 9,290 9,290 9,290 110 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ........................................................................... 306,595 306,595 306,595 306,595 

111 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 424,454 464,454 444,454 424,454 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [40,000 ] Program Increase- software Integration ................................................. [20,000 ] 

112 0604883C PRECISION TRACKING SPACE SENSOR RDT&E ................................................ 160,818 160,818 –80,000 80,818 

Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–160,818 ] [–80,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
892 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

113 0604884C AIRBORNE INFRARED (ABIR) ............................................................................ 46,877 66,877 46,877 46,877 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] 

115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM ................................ 3,358 3,358 3,358 3,358 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 6,808,233 6,949,715 7,117,345 15,312 6,823,545 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION (SDD) 

117 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 7,220 7,220 7,220 7,220 118 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 204,824 179,824 204,824 –25,000 179,824 

Program Reduction ................................................................................. [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

119 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 400,608 400,608 390,608 –84,000 316,608 

Bioscavenger program delays ................................................................. [–24,000 ] Decontamination FOS delays .................................................................. [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] MCMI RFP release delay ......................................................................... [–50,000 ] 

120 0604709D8Z JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM .............................................................................. 2,782 2,782 2,782 2,782 

121 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) ......................... 49,198 49,198 44,198 –10,374 38,824 

Cyber threat discovery ............................................................................ [20,000 ] [15,000 ] Program growth ...................................................................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,374 ] 

122 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) ....................... 17,395 17,395 17,395 17,395 123 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES ............................... 5,888 5,888 5,285 5,888 

Due to slow execution ............................................................................. [–603 ] 

124 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 12,228 12,228 12,228 12,228

127 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................. 389 389 389 389 128 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM ................................................................ 1,929 1,929 1,929 1,929 129 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ........................................................... 4,993 4,993 4,993 4,993 130 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................ 134,285 134,285 84,285 –40,000 94,285 

Program Growth ...................................................................................... [–50,000 ] [–40,000 ] 

131 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION .................................................................... 41,808 41,808 31,808 41,808 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
893 

Program Growth ...................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

133 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES ............................ 14,950 14,950 14,950 14,950 135 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 19,837 19,837 19,837 19,837 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION (SDD) ............... 918,334 893,334 842,731 –159,374 758,960 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

137 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) ......................................... 6,658 6,658 6,658 6,658 138 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 4,731 4,731 4,731 4,731 139 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVAULATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) .......... 140,231 140,231 140,231 140,231 140 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS ................................................................... 2,757 2,757 2,757 2,757 

141 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ............................................................................................... 7,827 7,827 7,827 7,827 142 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) ............................... 10,479 10,479 10,479 10,479 143 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ............................................... 34,213 34,213 28,213 34,213 

OSD recommendation due to underexecution ......................................... [–6,000 ] 

144 0605110D8Z USD(A&T)--CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT .................................................. 1,486 18 1,486 1,486 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–1,468 ] 

145 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION ..................................... 64,524 64,524 64,524 64,524 146 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) ....... 79,859 79,859 61,490 79,859 

Underexecution ........................................................................................ [–18,369 ] 

148 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ..................................................................... 19,080 19,080 19,080 19,080 

149 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................................................... 41,884 41,884 41,884 41,884 150 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ........................................................ 4,261 4,261 4,261 4,261151 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION ............................. 9,437 9,437 9,437 9,437 152 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ................................................... 6,549 6,549 6,549 6,549 153 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 92,806 92,806 92,806 92,806 160 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S. 1,924 1,924 1,924 1,924 

161 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .................................................................... 16,135 16,135 16,135 16,135 

163 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) ....................................... 56,269 51,269 52,269 56,269 

Program Decrease ................................................................................... [–4,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

164 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION .............. 49,810 49,810 49,810 49,810 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
894 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

165 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION ............................................................ 15,805 15,805 20,805 3,500 19,305 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] [3,500 ] 

166 0605897E DARPA AGENCY RELOCATION ........................................................................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 

167 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 66,689 66,689 66,689 66,689 168 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ........................................................... 4,528 4,528 4,528 4,528

169 0606301D8Z AVIATION SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES .................................................................... 6,925 6,925 6,925 6,925 170 0203345D8Z OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) ...................................................................... 1,777 1,777 1,777 1,777 171 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT ................................................................. 18 18 18 18 174 0303166D8Z SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES ........................... 12,209 12,209 12,209 12,209 175 0303169D8Z INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RAPID ACQUISITION ............................................ 4,288 4,288 4,288 4,288 176 0305103E CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 10,000 10,000 5,000 –5,000 5,000 

Execution delays ..................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

177 0305193D8Z INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) .......................... 15,002 15,002 15,002 15,002 179 0305400D8Z WARFIGHTING AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED SUPPORT .................................... 861 861 861 861 180 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2) 59,958 59,958 59,958 –21,868 38,090 

P754, Duplication with Service initiatives ............................................. [–21,868 ] 

182 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................................................. 28,908 28,908 28,908 28,908 

183 0901598D8W IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES ......................................................................... 167 167 167 167 

184A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 82,627 82,627 82,627 82,627 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 961,682 955,214 933,313 –23,368 938,314 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

185 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ............................................................ 8,706 8,706 8,706 –2,500 6,206 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–2,500 ] 

186 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE 

INFORMATION MANA.

2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
895 

187 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM 

(OHASIS).

288 288 288 288 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT). 15,956 15,956 15,956 15,956 

189 0607828D8Z JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 29,880 29,880 29,880 29,880 190 0208043J CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 2,402 2,402 2,402 2,402 191 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ..................................................................................... 72,403 72,403 72,403 72,403 193 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING ............................................ 7,093 7,093 7,093 7,093 200 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT ................................ 481 481 481 481 201 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION ............... 8,366 8,366 18,366 7,500 15,866 

Cybersecurity pilots ................................................................................. [10,000 ] [7,500 ] 

202 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ............................................................. 11,324 11,324 11,324 11,324 203 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 12,514 12,514 12,514 12,514 204 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) ............................................................... 6,548 6,548 6,548 6,548 205 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) .................................................... 33,751 33,751 33,751 33,751206 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 11,753 11,753 11,753 11,753207 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 348,593 348,593 351,593 348,593 

File sanitization tool (FiST) ..................................................................... [3,000 ] 

208 0303140K INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 211 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................................... 54,739 54,739 54,739 54,739 212 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ............................................................... 29,154 29,154 29,154 29,154 

213 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ................................................. 1,830 1,830 1,830 1,830 214 0303260D8Z JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE ............................................................ 1,241 1,241 1,241 1,241 215 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 6,418 6,418 6,418 6,418 217 0304210BB SPECIAL APPILCATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ................................................. 5,045 9,045 5,045 5,045 

Program Increase .................................................................................... [4,000 ] 

220 0305103D8Z CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 411 411 411 411 222 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 4,341 4,341 4,341 4,341 223 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ............................................... 13,008 13,008 13,008 13,008 227 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 6,603 6,603 2,892 6,603 

OSD recommendation due to underexecution ......................................... [–3,711 ] 

229 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ............................................................................................... 14,926 14,926 11,693 14,926 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
896 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

OSD recommendation due to underexecution ......................................... [–3,233 ] 

232 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 4,303 4,303 4,303 –3,000 1,303 

Unjustified increase ................................................................................ [–3,000 ] 

235 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 3,154 3,154 3,154 3,154 237 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 2,499 2,499 2,499 2,499 

239 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM .............................. 2,660 2,660 2,660 2,660 240 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES ............... 1,444 1,444 1,444 1,444 248 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 23,103 28,103 23,103 23,103 

Industrial Preparedness Manufacturing Technology .............................. [5,000 ] 

249 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 2,466 2,466 2,466 2,466 

250 0902298J MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS) ............................................................... 2,730 2,730 2,730 2,730 252 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 2,499 2,499 2,499 2,499 253 1105232BB RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 –1,500 1,500 

Lack of full funding ................................................................................ [–1,500 ] 

254 1105233BB RQ–7 UAV ......................................................................................................... 450 450 450 450 256 1160403BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............ 89,382 89,382 89,382 –15,000 74,382 

MC–130 TF/TA radar contract award delay ........................................... [–15,000 ] 

257 1160404BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TACTICAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .............................. 799 799 799 799 258 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................... 27,916 27,916 27,916 27,916 259 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................................. 60,915 60,915 60,915 60,915 260 1160421BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS CV–22 DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 10,775 10,775 10,775 10,775263 1160427BB MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION SYSTEMS (MTPS) ................................ 4,617 4,617 4,617 4,617 265 1160429BB AC/MC–130J ..................................................................................................... 18,571 18,571 18,571 18,571 266 1160474BB SOF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS ................. 1,392 1,392 1,392 1,392 268 1160477BB SOF WEAPONS SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 2,610 2,610 2,610 2,610 269 1160478BB SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS ...................................... 2,971 2,971 2,971 2,971 270 1160479BB SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS AND SENSOR SYSTEMS ........................ 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
897 

271 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES .................................................................................. 3,522 3,522 3,522 3,522 272 1160481BB SOF MUNITIONS ................................................................................................ 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 273 1160482BB SOF ROTARY WING AVIATION ........................................................................... 51,123 51,123 51,123 51,123 274 1160483BB SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ............................................................................ 92,424 92,424 92,424 –24,000 68,424 

Excessive growth ..................................................................................... [–24,000 ] 

275 1160484BB SOF SURFACE CRAFT ....................................................................................... 14,475 14,475 14,475 14,475 

276 1160488BB SOF MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................... 2,990 2,990 2,990 2,990 277 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ............................................... 8,923 8,923 8,923 8,923 278 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ......................................... 9,473 9,473 9,473 9,473 

278A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 4,227,920 4,227,920 4,263,700 37,780 4,265,700 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................. [35,780 ] [35,780 ] File sanitization tool (FiST) authorization adjustment ........................... [2,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 5,399,045 5,408,045 5,440,881 –720 5,398,325 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

279A 0901XXXD UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................ –200,000 0 

Undistributed reduction--additional unrestricted cut to DARPA topline [–50,000 ] Undistributed reduction--DARPA Underexecution ................................... [–150,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................... –200,000 0 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ....................... 19,755,678 19,864,887 19,813,751 –318,878 19,436,800 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION .............................................................. 60,444 60,444 60,444 60,444 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .................................................................... 12,126 12,126 12,126 12,126 003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ............................................... 118,722 118,722 118,722 118,722 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 191,292 191,292 191,292 191,292 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE ................................... 191,292 191,292 191,292 191,292 

TOTAL RDT&E ...................................................................................... 75,325,082 75,559,479 71,830,193 –3,754,365 71,570,717 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
898 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

140 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ................................................................. 8,513 8,513 8,513 8,513 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .............................................. 8,513 8,513 8,513 8,513 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ..................... 8,513 8,513 8,513 8,513 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ....... 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

097 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 

119 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 126 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ........................... 11,050 11,050 11,050 11,050 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

172 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

189 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .................................................... 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 192 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) ........................... 4,050 4,050 4,050 4,050 215 0305231N MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................................... 104,600 0 

ECP for SOCOM urgent needs statement—transfer from Title II, RDN 

215.

[104,600 ] 

227A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 33,784 33,784 33,784 33,784 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 41,334 41,334 41,334 41,334 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
899 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY ...................... 53,884 53,884 158,484 53,884 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

200 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ....................................................... 73,000 73,000 58,000 –10,000 63,000 

Blue Devil ARGUS Sensors—Already Funded Through Reprogramming 

Actions.

[–15,000 ] 

Excess to need .......................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

242A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 142,000 142,000 142,000 142,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF .......................... 142,000 142,000 127,000 –10,000 132,000 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

152 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ..................................................... 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .............................................. 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

202 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ............................................................... 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 207 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................... 32,850 32,850 32,850 32,850211 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ....................................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 254 1105233BB RQ–7 UAV ........................................................................................................... 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 

278A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 135,361 135,361 120,581 –10,000 125,361 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................... [–14,780 ] [–10,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 183,161 183,161 183,161 183,161 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ......................... 192,361 192,361 177,581 –10,000 182,361 

TOTAL RDT&E ........................................................................................ 396,758 396,758 471,578 –20,000 376,758 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
900 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ................................................................................................................. 1,399,804 1,399,804 1,249,071 –368,109 1,031,695 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training Strategy ............................................ [–217,376 ] Transfer to Title XV: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment ....................................................... [–2,539 ] [–2,539 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction ....................................................... [–148,194 ] [–148,194 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................................................................................ 104,629 104,629 102,347 –14,034 90,595 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training Strategy ............................................ [–11,752 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction ....................................................... [–2,282 ] [–2,282 ] 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ................................................................................................. 815,920 815,920 815,920 –74,852 741,068 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training Strategy ............................................ [–74,852 ] 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ....................................................................................................... 825,587 825,587 796,595 –60,769 764,818 

Transfer to Title XV: Chemical Defense Equipment Sustainment .............................. [–8,579 ] Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training Strategy ............................................ [–23,198 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction ....................................................... [–18,692 ] [–18,692 ] Transfer to Title XV: UAS—Gray Eagle Satellite Service ........................................... [–10,300 ] [–10,300 ] 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................. 1,245,231 1,245,231 1,199,827 –172,818 1,072,413 

Transfer to Title XV: Combat Training Center Role Players ....................................... [–30,091 ] Transfer to Title XV: Fox Nuclear Biological and Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle 

Contract Logistics Support ..................................................................................... [–12,062 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
901 

Transfer to Title XV: Joint Maneuver Readiness Center Opposing Force Augmentation .......................................................................................................................... [–4,545 ] Transfer to Title XV: Joint Readiness Training Center Opposing Force Augmentation .......................................................................................................................... [–26,940 ] Transfer to Title XV: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment at Combat Training Centers ......... [–6,420 ] [–6,420 ] Transfer to Title XV: National Training Center Tier Two Level Maintenance Contract [–24,000 ] [–24,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: National Training Center Warfighter Focus .............................. [–26,650 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction ....................................................... [–14,984 ] [–14,984 ] Transfer to Title XV: Tube-Launched, Optically-Tracked, Wire-Guided Missile (TOW) 

Improved Target Acquisition System (ITAS) Contract Logistics Support ............... [–6,841 ] 

Transfer to TitleXV: Sustainment Brigade and Functional Brigade Warfighter Exercise .......................................................................................................................... [–20,285 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS .................................................................................................................. 1,199,340 1,199,340 1,137,835 –68,112 1,131,228 

Transfer to Title XV: Combined Arms Training Strategy ............................................ [–6,607 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Demand Reduction ....................................................... [–61,505 ] [–61,505 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................................................... 2,939,455 2,943,455 2,847,795 –160,656 2,778,799 

FOB Baseline Not Taken into Account in Requested Program Growth ...................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] Simulation Training Systems ...................................................................................... [4,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: Battle Simulation Centers ......................................................... [–59,702 ] Transfer to Title XV: Body Armor Sustainment ........................................................... [–71,660 ] [–71,660 ] Transfer to Title XV: Rapid Equipping Force Readiness ............................................ [–9,294 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................................................................................... 451,228 451,228 431,228 –46,332 404,896 

Deny Requested Growth for Civilian and Contractor Positions .................................. [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: Capability Development and Integration .................................. [–5,161 ] Transfer to Title XV: Fixed Wing Life Cycle Contract Support ................................... [–21,171 ] 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ................................................................................... 1,179,675 1,179,675 1,179,675 –147,836 1,031,839 

Budget Justification does not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Utilities .................................................................................................................... [–37,500 ] 

Removal of fiscal year 2011 Costs Budgeted for Detainee Operations (Full fiscal 

year 2012 Requirement Funded in Title XV) .......................................................... [–70,000 ] 

Transfer to title XV: Senior Leader Initiative: Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program ........................................................................................................................ [–30,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
902 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Transfer to title XV: Training Range Maintenance ..................................................... [–10,336 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 7,637,052 7,867,052 7,329,552 –307,500 7,329,552 

Army Base Operating Services .................................................................................... [230,000 ] Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Utilities .................................................................................................................... [–37,500 ] [–37,500 ] 

Removal of FY11 Costs Budgeted for Detainee Operations (Full FY12 Requirement 

Funded in OCO) ...................................................................................................... [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Overseas Security Guards ......................................................... [–200,000 ] [–200,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ............................................ 2,495,667 2,757,047 2,495,667 2,495,667 

Army Industrial Facility Energy monitoring ................................................................ [2,380 ] Army Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .................................... [259,000 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .................................................................................. 397,952 397,952 397,952 397,952 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .................................................................. 171,179 171,179 171,179 171,179 170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .............................................................. 459,585 459,585 459,585 –20,470 439,115 

Military Information Support Operations .................................................................... [–20,470 ] 

175 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –1,504,500 –1,504,500 

Contractor Logistics Support ...................................................................................... [–50,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: Readiness and Depot Maintenance .......................................... [–1,454,500 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 21,322,304 21,817,684 20,614,228 –2,945,988 18,376,316 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ............................................................................................................ 390,394 390,394 390,394 390,394 190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ........................................................................................... 169,535 169,535 169,535 169,535 

200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................................................ 6,675 6,675 6,675 6,675 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................................................................................ 566,604 566,604 566,604 566,604 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
903 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION ........................................................................................................... 113,262 114,662 113,262 113,262 

Expansion of Diversity Recruitment Efforts ................................................................ [1,400 ] 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING ............................................................................................................... 71,012 71,012 71,012 71,012 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ............................................................................................... 49,275 49,275 49,275 49,275 240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .................................................................... 417,071 417,071 417,071 417,071 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................................................................................... 1,045,948 1,045,948 1,045,948 –15,183 1,030,765 

Transfer to Title XV: Survivability and Maneuverability Training .............................. [–15,183 ] 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................................................. 1,083,808 1,083,808 1,083,808 1,083,808 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .......................................................................... 191,073 191,073 191,073 191,073 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ............................................................................................................... 607,896 607,896 607,896 607,896 290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 523,501 523,501 523,501 523,501 300 EXAMINING ............................................................................................................................ 139,159 139,159 139,159 139,159 310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .............................................................................. 238,978 238,978 238,978 238,978 320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................................................................................... 221,156 221,156 221,156 221,156 330 JUNIOR ROTC ........................................................................................................................ 170,889 170,889 170,889 170,889 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ...................................................................... 4,873,028 4,874,428 4,873,028 –15,183 4,857,845 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

340 SECURITY PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................... 995,161 995,161 995,161 –1,360 993,801 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................................................. [–1,360 ]

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 524,334 524,334 524,334 524,334 360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................... 705,668 705,668 705,668 705,668 370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 484,075 490,075 484,075 3,000 487,075 

Army Arsenals .............................................................................................................. [6,000 ] Army Requested Transfer for Army Enterprise Systems Integration Program from 

Other Procurement, Army line 116 ......................................................................... [3,000 ] 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 457,741 457,741 387,741 –70,000 387,741 

Requested Growth Unjustified by Metrics Provided in Performance Criteria ............ [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] 

390 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 775,313 775,313 775,313 775,313 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 1,534,706 1,490,706 1,504,706 –23,749 1,510,957 

Army Requested Transfer for General Fund Enterprise Business System (GFEBS) 

from Other Procurement, Army Line 116 ............................................................... [3,368 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
904 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army Requested Transfer for Global Combat Support System—Army (GCSS–Army) 

from Other Procurement, Army Line 116 ............................................................... [2,883 ] 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

DISA ......................................................................................................................... [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [–44,000 ] 

410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 316,924 316,924 316,924 316,924 420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 214,356 214,356 214,356 214,356 430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 1,093,877 1,083,877 1,033,877 –60,000 1,033,877 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

DFAS ........................................................................................................................ [–50,000 ] [–50,000 ] 

Unjustified program growth-Joint DOD Support ......................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] Unjustified program growth-PA Strategic Communications ....................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................... 216,621 216,621 216,621 216,621 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 180,717 180,717 157,813 –10,000 170,717 

BA–4 Adjustment for Defense Efficiency—Civilian Staffing Reduction .................... [–12,904 ] Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund ....................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

455 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS .............................................................. 44,000 0 

Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [44,000 ] 

460 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS .......................................................................................... 449,901 449,901 449,901 449,901 470 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS .................................................................................... 23,886 23,886 23,886 –3,000 20,886 

Transfer from SAG 411—Military Information Support Operations ........................... [–3,000 ] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................................................. 7,973,280 7,969,280 7,790,376 –165,109 7,808,171 

UNDISTRIBUTED 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
905 

480 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –395,600 –3,942,465 –1,079,704 –1,079,704 

Adjustment for Defense Efficiency—Civilian Staffing Reduction .............................. [–166,365 ] BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 ADJUSTMENT FOR DEFENSE EFFICIENCY CIVILIAN STAFFING 

REDUCTION .............................................................................................................. [–12,904 ] 

Center for Military Family and Community Outreach ................................................. [1,000 ] Decrease in OPTEMPO as cited by Army .................................................................... [–291,500 ] [–291,500 ]IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF TELECOM SERVICES ..................................................... [–10,000 ] Management efficiencies in the military intelligence program ................................. [–29,900 ] Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................................ [–10,600 ] [–10,600 ] [–10,600 ] Reduction in funding for contract services ................................................................ [–121,700 ] Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ....................................................... [–46,000 ] Section 8089 - Excess Cash Balances in DWCF ........................................................ [–515,000 ] Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................... [–1,400 ] [–1,400 ] [–1,400 ] Transfer to OCO: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ............ [–3,000,000 ] Unobligated balances .................................................................................................. [–384,600 ] [–275,000 ] [–238,300 ] 

999 CLASSIFIED ........................................................................................................................... 1,600 0 

Classified adjustment ................................................................................................. [1,600 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –395,600 –3,940,865 –1,079,704 –1,079,704 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ........................................................... 34,735,216 34,832,396 29,903,371 –4,205,984 30,529,232 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 4,762,887 4,762,887 4,762,887 –263,500 4,499,387 

Transfer to Title XV: Flying Hours ............................................................................... [–180,945 ] Transfer to Title XV: MV 22B Pricing Variance .......................................................... [–82,555 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ............................................................................................................. 1,771,644 1,771,644 1,771,644 1,771,644 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES ...................................................... 46,321 46,321 46,321 46,321 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .............................................................................. 104,751 104,751 104,751 –17,000 87,751 

Unjustified Growth for Program Related Logistics Support ....................................... [–17,000 ] 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ........................................................................................................ 431,576 431,576 431,576 431,576 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................... 1,030,303 1,101,503 1,030,303 1,030,303 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
906 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Aviation Depot Maintenance (Active) .......................................................................... [71,200 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................. 37,403 37,403 37,403 37,403 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ............................................................................................................. 238,007 265,007 238,007 238,007 

Aviation Logistics ........................................................................................................ [27,000 ] 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 3,820,186 3,820,186 3,820,186 –25,000 3,795,186 

Reduced Number of Deployed Steaming Days ........................................................... [–25,000 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ............................................................................ 734,866 734,866 734,866 734,866 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 4,972,609 5,338,609 4,972,609 150,000 5,122,609 

Ship Depot Maintenance (Active) ............................................................................... [366,000 ] [150,000 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..................................................................................... 1,304,271 1,304,271 1,304,271 –7,000 1,297,271 

Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for Surface Ship Life Cycle Maintenance (SSLCM) Activity and Local Command Office for Navy Enterprise Resource Planning ...................................................................................................... [–7,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................. 583,659 583,659 583,659 –27,400 556,259 

Eliminate Requested Growth of Contractor Full-time Equivalents ............................ [–27,400 ] 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ......................................................................................................... 97,011 97,011 97,011 97,011 

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE .................................................................................. 162,303 162,303 137,303 –25,000 137,303 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes ...... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ................................................................................................................ 423,187 423,187 423,187 423,187 170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ........................................................... 320,141 320,141 320,141 320,141 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .................................................................................................. 1,076,478 1,076,478 1,076,478 –192,801 883,677 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command Increases ................... [–192,801 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................... 187,037 187,037 187,037 187,037 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 4,352 4,352 4,352 4,352 210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .................................................................. 103,830 103,830 103,830 103,830 220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ...................................................... 180,800 180,800 180,800 –14,400 166,400 

Military Information Support Operations .................................................................... [–6,100 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
907 

Transfer to Title XV: Joint Special Operations Task Force—Philippines ................... [–8,300 ] 

230 CRUISE MISSILE .................................................................................................................... 125,333 125,333 125,333 125,333 240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ..................................................................................................... 1,209,410 1,209,410 1,209,410 1,209,410 250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT .......................................................................... 99,063 99,063 99,063 –9,000 90,063 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command .................................... [–9,000 ] 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 450,454 450,454 450,454 450,454 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................................................................................... 358,002 358,002 358,002 358,002 280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 971,189 971,189 971,189 971,189 290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................... 1,946,779 2,298,779 1,946,779 1,946,779 

Navy Metering .............................................................................................................. [3,000 ] Navy Sustainment Restoration and Modernization to 100% ..................................... [349,000 ] 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 4,610,525 4,610,525 4,590,525 –70,000 4,540,525 

Savings from In-sourcing Security Contractor Positions Not Properly Accounted for 

in Budget Documentation ....................................................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

Transfer to Title XV: Regional/Emergency Operations Center .................................... [–50,000 ] 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... 2,000 –645,000 –645,000 

CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT ............................................................................. [–150,000 ] Navy Emergency Management and Preparedness ...................................................... [2,000 ] TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... [–495,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 32,164,377 32,982,577 32,119,377 –1,146,101 31,018,276 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ...................................................................................... 493,326 493,326 493,326 493,326 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ............................................................................... 6,228 6,228 6,228 6,228 330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ....................................................................................... 205,898 205,898 205,898 205,898 340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS ...................................................................... 68,634 68,634 68,634 –5,004 63,630 

Transfer to Title XV: Medical/Equipment costs for USNS MERCY .............................. [–5,004 ] 

350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS ........................................................................................................ 2,684 2,684 2,684 2,684 360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 25,192 25,192 25,192 25,192 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................................................................................ 801,962 801,962 801,962 –5,004 796,958 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
908 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION ........................................................................................................... 147,540 148,940 147,540 147,540 

Expansion of Diversity Recruitment Efforts ................................................................ [1,400 ] 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING ............................................................................................................... 10,655 10,655 10,655 10,655 

390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ................................................................................. 151,147 151,147 151,147 –2,786 148,361 

Excessive Program Increase for General Services Administration Lease Cost .......... [–2,786 ] 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................................................................................... 594,799 594,799 594,799 –50,521 544,278 

Transfer to Title XV: Naval Sea Systems Command Visit, Board, Search and Seizure (VBSS)/Explosive Ordnance Device (EOD) Training ........................................ [–3,000 ] Unjustified Growth in Moored and Tech Training ...................................................... [–47,521 ] 

410 FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................................................. 9,034 9,034 9,034 9,034 

420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .......................................................................... 173,452 173,452 173,452 173,452 430 TRAINING SUPPORT ............................................................................................................... 168,025 168,025 168,025 168,025 440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 254,860 255,843 254,860 983 255,843 

Naval Sea Cadet Corps .......................................................................................... [983 ] [983 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .............................................................................. 140,279 140,279 140,279 140,279 

460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................................................................................... 107,561 107,561 107,561 107,561 470 JUNIOR ROTC ........................................................................................................................ 52,689 52,689 52,689 52,689 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ...................................................................... 1,810,041 1,812,424 1,810,041 –52,324 1,757,717 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 754,483 692,483 754,483 754,483 

Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [–62,000 ] 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ........................................................................................................... 14,275 14,275 14,275 14,275 500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 112,616 112,616 112,616 112,616 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 216,483 216,483 216,483 –12,557 203,926 

Transfer to Title XV: Family Readiness Programs ...................................................... [–3,557 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
909 

Transfer to Title XV: Navy Manpower and Personnel System/NSIPS .......................... [–9,000 ] 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 282,295 282,295 282,295 282,295 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 534,873 534,873 534,873 534,873 545 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS .............................................................. 62,000 0 

Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [62,000 ] 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 190,662 190,662 190,662 190,662 570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ................................................................................ 303,636 303,636 303,636 –10,000 293,636 

Unjustified Growth for Installation Emergency Management ..................................... [–10,000 ] 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 903,885 903,885 903,885 903,885 

590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT .................................................................. 54,880 54,880 54,880 54,880 600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ................................................................................................ 20,687 20,687 20,687 20,687 610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 68,374 68,374 68,374 68,374 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ............................................................................................ 572,928 572,928 572,928 572,928 680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ................................................................. 5,516 5,516 5,516 5,516 705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................ 552,715 552,715 546,715 –2,381 550,334 

Classified adjustment ................................................................................................. [–6,000 ] [–2,381 ] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 4,588,308 4,588,308 4,582,308 –24,938 4,563,370 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –445,700 –1,320,600 –67,000 –67,000 

Deny FY12 Budget Price Growth for Civilian Personnel Compensation ..................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF TELECOM SERVICES ..................................................... [–10,000 ] Management efficiencies in the military intelligence program ................................. [–11,300 ] Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................................ [–7,100 ] [–7,100 ] Reduction in funding for contract services ................................................................ [–122,800 ] Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ....................................................... [–52,900 ] Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................... [–2,700 ] [–2,700 ] Target area for reduction as cited by Navy ............................................................... [–500,000 ] Transfer to OCO: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ............ [–495,000 ] Unobligated balances .................................................................................................. [–435,900 ] [–123,800 ] [–52,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –445,700 –1,320,600 –67,000 –67,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
910 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ........................................................... 39,364,688 39,739,571 37,993,088 –1,295,367 38,069,321 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .......................................................................................................... 715,196 723,696 715,196 –20,000 695,196 

CBRNE Response Force Capability Enhancement ...................................................... [8,500 ] Request Inconsistent with Information Technology Budget Justification for the 

Global Combat Support System ............................................................................. [–20,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................... 677,608 677,608 677,608 677,608 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 190,713 190,713 78,713 –112,000 78,713 

Transfer to Title XV: Depot Maintenance .................................................................... [–112,000 ] [–112,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING .................................................................................................. 101,464 101,464 101,464 101,464 060 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 823,390 891,390 823,390 823,390 

Marine Corps Sustainment Restoration and Modernization to 100% ....................... [68,000 ] 

070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 2,208,949 2,208,949 1,973,949 –255,000 1,953,949 

Reduction for Collateral Equipment Requirements Not Properly Accounted for in 

Budget Documentation ........................................................................................... [–20,000 ] 

TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... [–235,000 ] [–235,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 4,717,320 4,793,820 4,370,320 –387,000 4,330,320 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

080 RECRUIT TRAINING ............................................................................................................... 18,280 18,280 18,280 18,280 090 OFFICER ACQUISITION ........................................................................................................... 820 820 820 820 100 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................................................................................... 85,816 85,816 85,816 85,816 

120 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .......................................................................... 33,142 33,142 33,142 33,142 130 TRAINING SUPPORT ............................................................................................................... 324,643 324,643 324,643 324,643 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
911 

140 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 184,432 184,432 184,432 184,432 150 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .............................................................................. 43,708 43,708 43,708 43,708 160 JUNIOR ROTC ........................................................................................................................ 19,671 19,671 19,671 19,671 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ...................................................................... 710,512 710,512 710,512 710,512 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 36,021 36,021 31,021 36,021 

Incorrect Price Growth Rate Used for Commercial Transportation ............................ [–5,000 ] 

190 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 405,431 414,431 405,431 405,431 

USMC Expeditionary Energy Office—Experimental Forward Operating Base ............ [9,000 ] 

200 ACQUISITION & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ............................................................................ 91,153 91,153 91,153 91,153 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 532,605 541,605 527,605 532,605 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

210 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –70,000 –199,300 –38,000 –38,000 

Mental Health Support for Military Personnel and Families ...................................... [3,000 ] OMMC Request Inconsistent with Information Technology Budget Justification for 

the Operational Support Systems—Command and Control .................................. [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................................ [–6,500 ] [–6,500 ] Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ....................................................... [–5,700 ] Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................... [–500 ] [–500 ] Target area for reduction as cited by Marine Corps ................................................. [–145,000 ] Unobligated balances .................................................................................................. [–66,000 ] [–21,600 ] [–18,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –70,000 –199,300 –38,000 –38,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ........................................... 5,960,437 5,975,937 5,409,137 –425,000 5,535,437 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .................................................................................................. 4,224,400 4,224,400 4,154,400 –660,158 3,564,242 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–590,158 ] Transfer to Title XV: Theater Security Package .......................................................... [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
912 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ......................................................................................... 3,417,731 3,417,731 3,379,731 –711,292 2,706,439 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–673,292 ] Removal of One-Time FY11 Costs for Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions .................................................................................................. [–4,000 ] [–4,000 ] Removal of One-Time FY11 Costs for Software Maintenance Requirements ............ [–24,000 ] [–24,000 ] Unjustified Increase in Travel ..................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ............................................................ 1,482,814 1,482,814 1,482,814 –102,550 1,380,264 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–102,550 ] 

050 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 2,204,131 2,204,131 2,204,131 1,584,475 3,788,606 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [1,584,475 ] 

060 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 1,652,318 1,924,238 1,652,318 1,652,318 

Air Force Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .............................. [271,920 ] 

070 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 2,507,179 2,507,179 2,482,179 –25,000 2,482,179 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Utilities .................................................................................................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

080 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ...................................................................................... 1,492,459 1,492,459 1,492,459 –210,435 1,282,024 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–198,435 ] Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for Long Range Radar Service Life 

Extension Program .................................................................................................. [–12,000 ] 

090 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 1,046,226 1,046,226 1,032,226 –26,688 1,019,538 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–12,688 ] Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions ............................................................................... [–14,000 ] [–14,000 ] 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................... 696,188 696,188 696,188 –5,000 691,188 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................................................. [–5,000 ]

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ............................................................................................................... 321,484 321,484 321,484 –8,000 313,484 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
913 

Overstated Requirement for Additional Fiscal Year 2012 Funding for Satellite and 

Launcher Control Ranges ....................................................................................... [–8,000 ] 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ................................................................................................... 633,738 633,738 626,738 –14,186 619,552 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–7,186 ] Removal of One-Time Fiscal Year 2011 Costs for Administrative Support for Contractor to Civilian Conversions ............................................................................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ...................................................... 735,488 735,488 698,128 –71,226 664,262 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–166 ] Military Information Support Operations .................................................................... [–33,700 ] Strategic Command Program Decreases Not Accounted for in Budget Documentation .......................................................................................................................... [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: CENTCOM HQ C4 ....................................................................... [–12,500 ] [–12,500 ]Transfer to Title XV: CENTCOM Public Affairs ............................................................ [–4,860 ] [–4,860 ] 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .................................................................. 170,481 170,481 170,481 170,481 

145 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –670,000 –670,000 

CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT ............................................................................. [–200,000 ] TRANSFER TO TITLE XV: READINESS AND DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... [–470,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 20,584,637 20,856,557 20,393,277 –920,060 19,664,577 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................. 2,988,221 2,988,221 2,988,221 –444,832 2,543,389 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–444,832 ] 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................................. 150,724 150,724 150,724 150,724 170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 373,568 373,568 373,568 444,832 818,400 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [444,832 ] 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 388,103 442,221 388,103 388,103 

Air Force Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .............................. [54,118 ] 

190 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 674,230 674,230 634,230 674,230 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Utilities .................................................................................................................... [–25,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Competitive Sourcing and Privitization ................................. [–15,000 ] SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................................................................................ 4,574,846 4,628,964 4,534,846 4,574,846 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
914 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION ........................................................................................................... 114,448 115,848 114,448 114,448 

Expansion of Diversity Recruitment Efforts ................................................................ [1,400 ] 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING ............................................................................................................... 22,192 22,192 22,192 22,192 220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ..................................................................... 90,545 90,545 90,545 90,545 230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 430,090 501,430 430,090 430,090 

Air Force Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .............................. [71,340 ] 

240 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 789,654 789,654 789,654 –40,000 749,654 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Utilities .................................................................................................................... [–25,000 ] 

Unjustified Growth for Competitive Sourcing and Privatization ................................ [–15,000 ] 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................................................................................... 481,357 481,357 471,357 –10,000 471,357 

Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

Equipment Maintenance by Contract ..................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................................................. 957,538 957,538 957,538 957,538 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .......................................................................... 198,897 198,897 198,897 198,897 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT ............................................................................................................... 108,248 108,248 108,248 108,248 290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 6,386 6,386 6,386 6,386 300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 136,102 136,102 136,102 136,102 310 EXAMINING ............................................................................................................................ 3,079 3,079 3,079 3,079 320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .............................................................................. 167,660 167,660 167,660 167,660 330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................................................................................... 202,767 202,767 202,767 –13,000 189,767 

Maintain Service Contracts at the fiscal year 2011 Level ........................................ [–13,000 ] 

340 JUNIOR ROTC ........................................................................................................................ 75,259 75,259 75,259 75,259 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ...................................................................... 3,784,222 3,856,962 3,774,222 –63,000 3,721,222 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
915 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................ 1,112,878 1,112,878 1,112,878 –626 1,112,252 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [–626 ] 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 785,150 785,150 785,150 785,150 

370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 14,356 14,356 14,356 626 14,982 

Consolidate Depot Maintenance Funding in the Depot Maintenance SAG ................ [626 ] 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 416,588 498,952 416,588 416,588 

Air Force Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .............................. [82,364 ] 

390 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 1,219,043 1,219,043 1,219,043 1,219,043 400 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 662,180 662,180 497,180 662,180 

Program decrease ........................................................................................................ [–165,000 ] 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 650,689 650,689 650,689 650,689 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 1,078,769 954,769 953,769 –18,000 1,060,769 

Air Force funds for Space Shuttle (for museum) ....................................................... [–14,000 ] [–14,000 ] Budget Justification Does Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for 

DFAS ........................................................................................................................ [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

Program decrease ........................................................................................................ [–104,000 ] [–11,000 ] Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [–110,000 ] 

425 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS .............................................................. 110,000 0 

Realignment of funds to support the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan ......................................................................................................................... [110,000 ] 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ................................................................................................................. 23,338 23,338 23,338 23,338 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ..................................................................................................... 72,589 72,589 72,589 72,589 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................ 1,215,848 1,215,848 1,217,348 –15,587 1,200,261 

Classified adjustment ................................................................................................. [1,500 ] [–15,587 ] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 7,251,428 7,319,792 6,962,928 –33,587 7,217,841 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –410,500 –1,204,400 –150,000 –150,000 

AUTHORIZATION ADJUSTMENT—UNOBLIGATED BALANCES ......................................... [–400,800 ] EXCESS WORKING CAPITAL FUND CARRYOVER ........................................................... [–90,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
916 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Management efficiencies in the military intelligence program ................................. [–46,600 ] Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................................ [–7,200 ] [–7,200 ] Reduction in funding for contract services ................................................................ [–144,200 ] Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ....................................................... [–26,200 ] Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................... [–2,500 ] [–2,500 ] Target area for reduction as cited by Air Force ......................................................... [–364,000 ] Transfer to Title XV: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ....... [–470,000 ] Unobligated balances .................................................................................................. [–143,700 ] [–60,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –410,500 –1,204,400 –150,000 –150,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .................................................. 36,195,133 36,251,775 34,460,873 –1,166,647 35,028,486 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ........................................................................................................ 563,787 563,787 558,287 –5,500 558,287 

Reduce Civilian Personnel Fiscal Year 2012 Average Salary Growth ........................ [–5,500 ] [–5,500 ] 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ......................................................................................... 3,986,766 3,989,766 3,893,859 –92,907 3,893,859 

Transfer to Title XV: Military Information Support Activities ................................. [–57,300 ] [–57,300 ] 

Aviation Foreign Internal Defense ............................................................................... [–17,607 ] [–17,607 ] Cold Weather Protective Equipment ........................................................................... [3,000 ] Reduce Civilian Personnel fiscal year 2012 Average Salary Growth ......................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] Sustaining Base Communications—Excessive Gowth ............................................... [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 4,550,553 4,553,553 4,452,146 –98,407 4,452,146 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

030 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY ..................................................................................... 124,075 124,075 124,075 124,075 

040 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY .......................................................................................... 93,348 93,348 93,348 93,348 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
917 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ...................................................................... 217,423 217,423 217,423 217,423 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS .................................................................................................. 159,692 149,323 159,692 159,692 

Innovative Readiness Training (Section 591) ............................................................. [–10,369 ] 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY .................................................................................... 508,822 508,822 508,822 –39,200 469,622 

Reduction in Non-Pay Personnel Support Overhead Costs ........................................ [–39,200 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ....................................................................... 1,147,366 1,147,366 1,147,366 1,147,366 

100 DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE ................................................................... 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY .............................................................................. 676,419 677,419 646,419 –30,430 645,989 

Overstatement of Fiscal Year 2012 Costs for Civilian Personnel .............................. [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] Unjustified Increase for the Request for Defense Advisory Committee on Women in 

the Services Program Reporting ............................................................................. [–430 ] 

Voluntary Separation Repayment ................................................................................ [1,000 ] 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY .......................................................................... 1,360,392 1,360,392 1,360,392 1,360,392 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .................................................................................... 37,367 37,367 37,367 37,367 150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ............................................................................................... 450,863 456,863 450,863 1,400 452,263 

Efficiencies in the Continutity of Operations Policy ................................................... [–3,000 ] Procurement Technical Assistance Centers ................................................................ [6,000 ] Procurement Technical Assistance Program ............................................................... [6,000 ] Unjustified Request for the Defense Property Accountability System Program Office [–1,600 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY .................................................................................................... 256,133 256,133 256,133 256,133 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ................................................................................................... 22,372 22,372 22,372 22,372 180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY - GLOBAL TRAIN AND EQUIP ......................... 500,000 400,000 350,000 –150,000 350,000 

Reduction to Global Train and Equip ......................................................................... [–100,000 ] [–150,000 ] [–150,000 ] 

185 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY - OTHER ......................................................... 182,831 182,831 180,551 –2,280 180,551 

Authorization Adjustment—Security Cooperation Assessment Office ........................ [–2,280 ] [–2,280 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ............................................................................................... 505,366 505,366 505,366 505,366 

200 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ........................................................... 33,848 33,848 33,848 33,848 210 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............................................................................... 432,133 432,133 432,133 432,133 220 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ................................................................ 2,768,677 2,768,677 2,648,677 –73,000 2,695,677 

DoD recommended reduction to MyCAA ...................................................................... [–120,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
918 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Transfer to Title XV: Child Care and Counseling ....................................................... [–73,000 ] 

230 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ................................................................................................... 202,758 202,758 202,758 202,758 

250 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT .................................................................................... 81,754 81,754 48,754 –33,000 48,754 

Ahead of need - Guam FSRM ..................................................................................... [–33,000 ] [–33,000 ] 

260 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ............................................................................ 2,201,964 2,313,964 2,181,964 –37,400 2,164,564 

Additional Efficiencies Based on Disestablishment of the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense (Networks and Information Integration) ................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

Department of Defense Corrosion Protection Projects ................................................ [22,700 ] DOD Installation Energy Manager Training Program ................................................. [3,000 ] Education and Employment Advocacy Program for Wounded Members of the 

Armed Forces .......................................................................................................... [15,000 ]

Establish Office of Language and Policy ................................................................... [6,000 ] Insider Threat Detection Program ............................................................................... [5,000 ] Office of Net Assessment ........................................................................................... [1,300 ] Postal Benefits Program ............................................................................................. [12,000 ] Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Victim Advocates .................................. [45,000 ] Substance Abuse Prevention Pilot Program ............................................................... [1,000 ] Unjustified Growth for Boards and Commissions ...................................................... [–7,300 ] Unjustified Growth for Equipment Maintenance by Contract .................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] Unjustified Growth for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Policy and for 

other OSD Programs ............................................................................................... [–10,100 ] 

Wounded Warriors Career Program ............................................................................. [1,000 ] 

270 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE ............................................................................... 563,184 563,184 550,684 –6,500 556,684 

Removal of Fiscal Year 2011 Costs Budgeted for the Defense Agencies Initiative [–6,500 ] [–6,500 ] Removal of FY11 Costs Budgeted for Boards, Commissions and Task Forces ......... [–6,000 ] 

275 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................ 14,068,492 14,068,492 13,911,653 –439,984 13,628,508 

Classified adjustment ................................................................................................. [–156,839 ] [–439,984 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
919 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 26,172,433 26,181,064 25,647,814 –810,394 25,362,039 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

280 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –413,000 –874,800 –155,245 –155,245 

DOD Impact Aid (Section 581) ................................................................................... [40,000 ] [25,000 ] [40,000 ] Management efficiencies in the military intelligence program ................................. [–41,300 ] Printing & Reproduction (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................................ [–4,300 ] [–4,300 ] Red Cross Reimbursement for Humanitarian Support to Service Members .............. [25,000 ] Reduction in funding for contract services ................................................................ [–694,800 ] Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ....................................................... [–27,600 ] Reduction to Federally Funded Research and Development Centers ......................... [–150,245 ] Severe disabilities ....................................................................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Studies, Analysis & Evaluations (10% cut)—Efficiency ........................................... [–16,900 ] [–16,900 ] Unobligated balances .................................................................................................. [–456,800 ] [–119,900 ] [–50,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –413,000 –874,800 –155,245 –155,245 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 30,940,409 30,539,040 29,442,583 –1,064,046 29,876,363 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ................................................................................................................. 1,091 1,091 1,091 1,091 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................................................................................ 18,129 18,129 18,129 18,129 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ................................................................................................. 492,705 492,705 492,705 492,705 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ....................................................................................................... 137,304 137,304 137,304 137,304 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................. 597,786 597,786 597,786 597,786 060 AVIATION ASSETS .................................................................................................................. 67,366 71,666 67,366 67,366 

Restore Flying Hours to Army Reserve ........................................................................ [4,300 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................................................... 474,966 474,966 474,966 –26,443 448,523 

Sustainment Costs For Weapons of Mass Destruction Equipment Purchases Not 

Needed in Fiscal Year 2012 ................................................................................... [–6,000 ] 

Unjustified Funding for Milcon Planning and Design ................................................ [–20,443 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................................................................................... 69,841 69,841 69,841 69,841 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
920 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ................................................................................... 247,010 247,010 247,010 247,010 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 590,078 590,078 583,078 –7,000 583,078 

Reduction for Payments to the General Services Administration for Standard Level 

User Charges Not Properly Accounted for in Budget Documentation ................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ............................................ 255,618 282,618 255,618 255,618 

Army Reserve Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% ...................... [27,000 ] 

125 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –91,000 0 

Decrease in OPTEMPO as cited by Army .................................................................... [–87,000 ] Deny Increase Budgeted for FY12 Price Growth for Civilian Compensation ............. [–4,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 2,951,894 2,983,194 2,853,894 –33,443 2,918,451 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 14,447 14,447 14,447 14,447 

140 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 76,393 76,393 76,393 76,393 150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 3,844 3,844 3,844 3,844 160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 9,033 9,033 9,033 9,033 170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 53,565 53,565 53,565 53,565 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 157,282 157,282 157,282 157,282 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

175 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –4,000 –4,000 

Unjustified Increase Budgeted for Fiscal Year 2012 Price Growth for Civilian Compensation ................................................................................................................ [–4,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –4,000 –4,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE ........................................... 3,109,176 3,140,476 3,011,176 –37,443 3,071,733 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
921 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 622,868 622,868 622,868 622,868 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 16,041 16,041 16,041 16,041 030 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .............................................................................. 1,511 1,511 1,511 1,511 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................... 123,547 125,047 123,547 123,547 

Aviation Depot Maintenance ....................................................................................... [1,500 ] 

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................. 379 379 379 379 

060 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 49,701 49,701 49,701 49,701 070 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ............................................................................ 593 593 593 593 080 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 53,916 54,916 53,916 53,916 

Ship Depot Maintenance (Reserve) ............................................................................. [1,000 ] 

090 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................. 15,445 15,445 15,445 15,445 

100 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .................................................................................................. 153,942 153,942 153,942 153,942 110 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 7,292 7,292 7,292 7,292 120 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 75,131 75,131 75,131 –18,000 57,131 

Unjustified Growth for Next Generation Enterprise Network Seat Services ............... [–18,000 ] 

130 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................... 72,083 72,083 72,083 72,083 

140 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 109,024 109,024 109,024 109,024 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 1,301,473 1,303,973 1,301,473 –18,000 1,283,473 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 1,857 1,857 1,857 1,857 160 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 14,438 14,438 14,438 14,438 

170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 2,394 2,394 2,394 2,394 180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 2,972 2,972 2,972 2,972 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 21,661 21,661 21,661 21,661 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE ........................................... 1,323,134 1,325,634 1,323,134 –18,000 1,305,134 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
922 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

010 OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................................................. 94,604 94,604 94,604 94,604 020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 16,382 16,382 16,382 16,382 040 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................... 31,520 31,520 31,520 31,520 050 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 105,809 105,809 105,809 105,809 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 248,315 248,315 248,315 248,315 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

070 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 852 852 852 852 

080 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 13,257 13,257 13,257 13,257 090 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 9,019 9,019 9,019 9,019 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 23,128 23,128 23,128 23,128 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE ........................... 271,443 271,443 271,443 271,443 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .................................................................................................. 2,171,853 2,208,753 2,171,853 2,171,853 

Restore Flying Hours to FY11 levels ........................................................................... [36,900 ] 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... 116,513 116,513 116,513 116,513 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 471,707 471,707 471,707 471,707 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 77,161 91,161 77,161 77,161

Air Force Reserve Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% ................ [14,000 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 308,974 308,974 308,974 308,974 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 3,146,208 3,197,108 3,146,208 3,146,208 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 84,423 84,423 84,423 84,423 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
923 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 17,076 17,076 17,076 17,076 080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) .................................................................. 19,688 19,688 19,688 19,688 090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ......................................................................... 6,170 6,170 6,170 6,170 100 AUDIOVISUAL ......................................................................................................................... 794 794 794 794 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 128,151 128,151 128,151 128,151 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE .................................. 3,274,359 3,325,259 3,274,359 3,274,359 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ................................................................................................................. 634,181 634,181 634,181 634,181 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................................................................................ 189,899 189,899 189,899 189,899 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ................................................................................................. 751,899 751,899 751,899 751,899 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ....................................................................................................... 112,971 112,971 112,971 112,971 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................. 33,972 33,972 33,972 33,972 060 AVIATION ASSETS .................................................................................................................. 854,048 861,768 854,048 –16,000 838,048 

Restore O&M Funding for Guard C–23 ...................................................................... [7,720 ] Unjustified Growth for Duty Military Occupation Specialities Qualified (DMOSQ) 

Training ................................................................................................................... [–16,000 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................................................... 706,299 713,299 706,299 706,299 

Civil Support Team Information Management Systems ............................................. [2,000 ] Increase funding for Guard simulator training .......................................................... [5,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................................................................................... 50,453 50,453 50,453 50,453 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ................................................................................... 646,608 646,608 646,608 646,608 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 1,028,126 1,028,126 988,626 –39,500 988,626 

Unjustified Growth for Public Affairs ......................................................................... [–4,500 ] [–4,500 ] Unjustified Growth for Travel ...................................................................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] Unjustified Growth for Utilities Based on Metrics Provided in Budget Documentation .......................................................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ............................................ 618,513 684,513 618,513 618,513 

Army National Guard Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .......... [66,000 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .................................................................................. 792,575 792,575 787,575 –5,000 787,575 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
924 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army National Guard-Identified Excess ...................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 6,419,544 6,500,264 6,375,044 –60,500 6,359,044 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................... 11,703 11,703 11,703 11,703 

150 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 178,655 178,655 178,655 178,655 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................... 42,073 42,073 42,073 42,073 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 6,789 6,789 6,789 6,789 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 382,668 382,668 382,668 382,668 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 621,888 621,888 621,888 621,888 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

185 UNDISTRIBUTED .................................................................................................................... –156,500 –56,000 –56,000 

Decrease in OPTEMPO as cited by Army .................................................................... [–125,500 ] [–25,000 ] Deny Increase Budgeted for Fiscal Year 2012 Price Growth for Civilian Compensation .......................................................................................................................... [–11,000 ] [–11,000 ] Reduction in non-dual status technician limitation .................................................. [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................................... –156,500 –56,000 –56,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ............................. 7,041,432 7,122,152 6,840,432 –116,500 6,924,932 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 3,651,900 3,703,000 3,651,900 –4,000 3,647,900 

Overstated Requirement for Additional fiscal year 2012 Funding for Air Sovereignty Alert Program ............................................................................................ [–4,000 ] Restore Flying Hours to FY11 Levels .......................................................................... [51,100 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
925 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... 751,519 751,519 751,519 751,519 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................... 753,525 753,525 753,525 753,525 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................. 284,348 330,348 284,348 284,348 

Air National Guard Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization to 100% .............. [46,000 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................................... 621,942 621,942 588,442 –33,500 588,442 

O&M Air National Guard Request Inconsistent with Information Technology Budget 

Justification for Base Level Communication Infrastructure .................................. [–23,500 ] [–23,500 ] 

O&M Air National Guard Request Inconsistent with MIP Budget Justification for 

Air Intelligence Systems ......................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................. 6,063,234 6,160,334 6,029,734 –37,500 6,025,734 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 39,387 39,387 39,387 39,387 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................................................................................ 33,659 33,659 33,659 33,659 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .................................................................... 73,046 73,046 73,046 73,046 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD ................................. 6,136,280 6,233,380 6,102,780 –37,500 6,098,780 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE ............................................. 13,861 13,861 13,861 13,861 020 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID ......................................................... 107,662 107,662 107,662 107,662 

030 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ...................................................................................... 508,219 508,219 508,219 508,219 040 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD .................................................................................................... 305,501 305,501 305,501 –200,000 105,501 

Program Decrease ....................................................................................................... [–200,000 ] 

050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY ................................................................................ 346,031 346,031 346,031 346,031 060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY ................................................................................. 308,668 308,668 308,668 308,668 070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE ........................................................................ 525,453 503,453 525,453 525,453 

Unjustified program growth ........................................................................................ [–22,000 ] 

080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ........................................................................... 10,716 10,716 10,716 10,716 

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED SITES .................................................... 276,495 276,495 276,495 276,495 

100 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND .................................................... 5,000 5,000 –5,000 0 

Program Reduction ...................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
926 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS .......................................................... 2,407,606 2,380,606 2,407,606 –205,000 2,202,606 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ............................................................ 2,407,606 2,380,606 2,407,606 –205,000 2,202,606 

010 DEFERRED EXPENSES FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS .............................................................. 406,605 0 

Deferred Expenses for foreign operations ................................................................... [406,605 ] 

............................................................................................................................................... 406,605 

TOTAL DEFERRED EXPENSES FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS .................................... 406,605 0 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ...................................................................... 170,759,313 171,137,669 160,846,587 –8,571,487 162,187,826 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ......................................................................................................... 3,424,314 3,424,314 3,453,306 60,769 3,485,083 

Transfer from Title III: Chemical Defense Equipment .................................................. [8,579 ] Transfer from Title III: Combined Arms Training Strategy ........................................... [23,198 ] Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction ..................................................... [18,692 ] [18,692 ] Transfer from Title III: UAS—Gray Eagle Satellite Service .......................................... [10,300 ] [10,300 ] 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................... 1,534,886 1,534,886 1,580,290 172,818 1,707,704 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
927 

Transfer from Title III: Combat Training Center Role Players ..................................... [30,091 ] Transfer from Title III: Fox Nuclear Biological and ChemicalReconnaissance Vehicle 

Contract Logistics Support ....................................................................................... [12,062 ] 

Transfer from Title III: Joint Maneuver Readiness Center Opposing Force Augmentation ........................................................................................................................... [4,545 ] Transfer from Title III: Joint Readiness Training Center Opposing Force Augmentation ........................................................................................................................... [26,940 ] Transfer from Title III: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment at Combat Training Centers ....... [6,420 ] [6,420 ] Transfer from Title III: National Training Center Tier Two Level Maintenance Contract .......................................................................................................................... [24,000 ] [24,000 ] Transfer from Title III: National Training Center War Fighter Focus ........................... [26,650 ] Transfer from Title III: Sustainment Brigade and FunctionalBrigade Warfighter Exercise ........................................................................................................................ [20,285 ] Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction ..................................................... [14,984 ] [14,984 ] Transfer from Title III: Tube-Launched, Optically-Tracked, Wire-Guided Missile 

(TOW) Improved Target Acquisition System (ITAS) Contract Logistics Support ...... [6,841 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ................................................................................................................... 87,166 87,166 148,671 68,112 155,278 

Transfer from Title III: Combined Arms Training Strategy ........................................... [6,607 ] Transfer from Title III: Theater Demand Reduction ..................................................... [61,505 ] [61,505 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................ 2,675,821 2,675,821 2,747,481 140,656 2,816,477 

Transfer from Title III: Battle Simulation Centers ....................................................... [59,702 ] Transfer from Title III: Body Armor Sustainment ......................................................... [71,660 ] [71,660 ] Transfer from Title III: Rapid Equipping Force Readiness ........................................... [9,294 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ..................................................................................... 579,000 579,000 579,000 26,332 605,332 

Transfer from Title III: Capability Development and Integration ................................. [5,161 ] Transfer from Title III: Fixed Wing Life Cycle Contract Support .................................. [21,171 ] 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................... 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 951,371 951,371 1,151,371 240,336 1,191,707 

Transfer from Title III: Overseas Security Guards ........................................................ [200,000 ] [200,000 ] Transfer from Title III: Senior Leader Initiative: Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program ......................................................................................................................... [30,000 ] Transfer from Title III: Training Range Maintenance ................................................... [10,336 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
928 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION .............................................. 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................................... 22,998,441 22,998,441 23,099,456 1,874,053 24,872,494 

ARGUS A–160 Deployment Delays ................................................................................ [–40,000 ] Military Information Support Operations ...................................................................... [–40,625 ] Synchronization Pre-Deployment and Operational Tracker Fully Funded in O&M DW 

Base Request in fiscal year 2012 ........................................................................... [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

Transfer from Base, SAG 111: MRAP Vehicle Sustainment ......................................... [2,539 ] [2,539 ] Transfer from Base, SAG 111: Theater Demand Reduction ......................................... [148,194 ] [148,194 ] Transfer from Base, SAG 112: Theater Demand Reduction ......................................... [2,282 ] [2,282 ] Transfer from title III—Readiness (transfer from BA–1 undistributed) ..................... [1,454,500 ] Transfer from title III SAG 111—Combined Arms Training Strategy .......................... [217,376 ] Transfer from title III SAG 112—Combined Arms Training Strategy .......................... [11,752 ] Transfer from title III SAG 113—Combined Arms Training Strategy .......................... [74,852 ] Transfer from title III SAG 321—Survivability and Maneuverability Training ............ [15,183 ] 

150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM ............................................................... 425,000 425,000 400,000 –25,000 400,000 

Unjustified Request for CERP Iraq ............................................................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

160 RESET ..................................................................................................................................... 3,955,429 3,955,429 3,955,429 3,955,429 175 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... 3,000,000 

Transfer from Base: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ......... [3,000,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 37,881,428 37,881,428 41,365,004 2,558,076 40,439,504 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

340 SECURITY PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 2,476,766 2,476,766 2,476,766 –40,000 2,436,766 

ARGUS A–160 deployment delays ................................................................................ [–40,000 ] 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................ 3,507,186 3,507,186 3,507,186 3,507,186 360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................. 50,740 50,740 50,740 50,740 380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 84,427 84,427 84,427 84,427 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
929 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................................................... 66,275 66,275 66,275 –26,200 40,075 

Transfer to Title II—Automated Biometric Identification System ............................... [–26,200 ] 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 143,391 143,391 143,391 143,391 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ..................................................................................................... 92,067 92,067 92,067 92,067 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................................................... 6,420,852 6,420,852 6,420,852 –66,200 6,354,652 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

480 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... –1,195,000 –1,195,000 

Department of Defense—Excess to Requirement ........................................................ [–1,195,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................... –1,195,000 –1,195,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ............................................................ 44,302,280 44,302,280 47,785,856 1,296,876 45,599,156 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............................................................................ 1,058,114 1,058,114 1,038,114 243,500 1,301,614 

Transfer from title III—Flying Hours ............................................................................ [180,945 ] Transfer from title III—MV 22B Pricing Variance ....................................................... [82,555 ] Unjustified Growth for Temporary Duty ........................................................................ [–20,000 ] [–20,000 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ............................................................................................................... 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES ........................................................ 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ............................................................................... 12,934 12,934 12,934 12,934 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT .......................................................................................................... 39,566 39,566 39,566 39,566 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................ 174,052 174,052 174,052 174,052 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................... 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ............................................................................................................... 50,852 50,852 50,852 50,852 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................................................................................ 1,132,948 1,132,948 1,132,948 –25,000 1,107,948 

Realignment of Funding to SAG 2C1H not Accounted for in Budget Documentation [–25,000 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING .............................................................................. 26,822 26,822 26,822 26,822 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 998,172 998,172 998,172 998,172 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................... 26,533 26,533 26,533 26,533 160 WARFARE TACTICS ................................................................................................................. 22,657 22,657 22,657 22,657 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
930 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ............................................................. 28,141 28,141 28,141 28,141 180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .................................................................................................... 1,932,640 1,932,640 1,932,640 192,801 2,125,441 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command Increases .................. [192,801 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................................... 19,891 19,891 19,891 19,891 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .................................................................... 5,465 5,465 5,465 5,465 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ........................................................ 2,093 2,093 2,093 8,300 10,393 

Transfer from title III—JSOTF-Philippines ................................................................... [8,300 ] 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................................................ 125,460 125,460 125,460 9,000 134,460 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Expeditionary Combat Command .................................. [9,000 ] 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 201,083 201,083 201,083 –35,000 166,083 

Unjustified Growth for Weapons Sustainment ............................................................. [–35,000 ] 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 1,457 1,457 1,457 1,457 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 5,095 5,095 5,095 –5,095 

Navy-Identified Excess for Network Management Systems .......................................... [–5,095 ] 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ............................................................. 26,793 26,793 26,793 26,793 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 352,210 352,210 344,880 42,670 394,880 

Civilian Pay Overstatement Due to No Requirement for FTE in this SAG ................... [–7,330 ] [–7,330 ] Transfer from Title III: Regional/Emergency Operations Center ................................... [50,000 ] 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... 495,000 495,000 495,000 

Transfer from Base: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ......... [495,000 ] [495,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 6,261,464 6,261,464 6,729,134 926,176 7,187,640 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ........................................................................................ 29,010 29,010 29,010 29,010 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 34,300 34,300 34,300 30,004 64,304 

Realignment of Funding from 1B1B not Accounted for in Budget Documentation .... [25,000 ] Transfer from Title III: Medical/Equipment costs for USNS MERCY ............................ [5,004 ] 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
931 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ........................................................................................................ 258,278 258,278 –258,278 

Direct Appropriation to Department of Homeland Security .......................................... [–258,278 ] [–258,278 ] SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................................................................................. 321,588 321,588 63,310 –228,274 93,314 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................ 69,961 69,961 69,961 3,000 72,961 

Transfer from Title III: Naval Sea Systems Command Visit, Board, Search and Seizure (VBSS)/Explosive Ordnance Device (EOD) Training .......................................... [3,000 ] 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT ................................................................................................................ 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........................................................................ 75,361 75,361 75,361 3,000 78,361 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................................... 2,348 2,348 2,348 2,348 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ......................................................... 6,142 6,142 6,142 12,557 18,699 

Transfer from Title III: Family Readiness Programs .................................................... [3,557 ] Transfer from Title III: Navy Manpower and Personnel System/NSIPS ........................ [9,000 ] 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 5,849 5,849 5,849 5,849 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................................................... 28,511 28,511 28,511 28,511 550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................ 263,593 263,593 263,593 –25,000 238,593 

Unjustified Growth for Transportation Estimates ......................................................... [–25,000 ] 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .......................................................................... 17,414 17,414 17,414 17,414 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ............................................................................................. 6,564 6,564 6,564 6,564 650 FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE .......................................................................................... 14,598 14,598 14,598 14,598 705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .......................................................................................................... 2,060 2,060 2,060 2,060 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 348,154 348,154 348,154 –12,443 335,711 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ............................................................. 7,006,567 7,006,567 7,215,959 688,459 7,695,026 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ........................................................................................................... 2,069,485 2,069,485 2,096,485 17,000 2,086,485 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
932 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Marine Corps Requested Transfer for Family of Shelters from Procurement, Marine 

Corps line 38 ............................................................................................................ [27,000 ] [17,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS .................................................................................................................... 575,843 575,843 575,843 575,843 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................. 251,100 251,100 363,100 112,000 363,100 

Transfer from Title III: Depot Maintenance .................................................................. [112,000 ] [112,000 ] 

070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 82,514 82,514 82,514 82,514 075 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... 235,000 235,000 235,000 

Transfer from Title III: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ..... [235,000 ] [235,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 2,978,942 2,978,942 3,352,942 364,000 3,342,942 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

130 TRAINING SUPPORT ................................................................................................................ 209,784 209,784 209,784 209,784 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........................................................................ 209,784 209,784 209,784 209,784 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................ 376,495 376,495 376,495 376,495 

190 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................................... 5,989 5,989 5,989 5,989 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 382,484 382,484 382,484 382,484 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ............................................ 3,571,210 3,571,210 3,945,210 364,000 3,935,210 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .................................................................................................... 2,115,901 2,115,901 2,185,901 70,000 2,185,901 

Transfer from Title III—Theater Security Package ...................................................... [70,000 ] [70,000 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES .......................................................................................... 2,033,929 2,033,929 2,033,929 2,033,929 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ............................................................. 46,844 46,844 46,844 46,844 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
933 

050 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................. 312,361 312,361 312,361 312,361 060 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................... 334,950 334,950 334,950 334,950 070 BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 641,404 641,404 641,404 641,404 080 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ........................................................................................ 69,330 69,330 69,330 69,330 090 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ................................................................................... 297,015 297,015 297,015 297,015 120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS .................................................................................................... 16,833 16,833 16,833 16,833 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ........................................................ 46,390 46,390 63,750 17,360 63,750 

Transfer from Title III: CENTCOM HQ C4 ...................................................................... [12,500 ] [12,500 ]Transfer from Title III: CENTCOM Public Affairs .......................................................... [4,860 ] [4,860 ] 

145 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... 470,000 470,000 470,000 

Transfer from Title III: Readiness and Depot Maintenance (BA–1 Undistributed) ..... [470,000 ] [470,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 5,914,957 5,914,957 6,472,317 557,360 6,472,317 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS .............................................................................................................. 3,533,338 3,533,338 3,533,338 3,533,338 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS .............................................................................................. 85,416 85,416 85,416 85,416 170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................. 161,678 161,678 161,678 161,678 180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................... 9,485 9,485 9,485 9,485 190 BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 30,033 30,033 30,033 30,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................................................................................. 3,819,950 3,819,950 3,819,950 3,819,950 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................... 908 908 908 908 240 BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 2,280 2,280 2,280 2,280 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................ 29,592 29,592 29,592 29,592 260 FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................................................... 154 154 154 154 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ........................................................................... 691 691 691 691 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ................................................................................................................ 753 753 753 753 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........................................................................ 34,378 34,378 34,378 34,378 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 155,121 155,121 155,121 155,121 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
934 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

390 BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 20,677 20,677 20,677 20,677 400 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................................... 3,320 3,320 3,320 3,320 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................................................... 111,561 111,561 111,561 111,561 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 605,223 605,223 605,223 605,223 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .......................................................................................................... 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 949,902 949,902 949,902 949,902 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... –25,000 –25,000 –25,000 

Unjustified Growth in Civilian Personnel Costs ........................................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................... –25,000 –25,000 –25,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .................................................... 10,719,187 10,719,187 11,251,547 532,360 11,251,547 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ......................................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ........................................................................................... 3,269,939 3,269,939 3,283,939 25,300 3,295,239 

Military Information Support Activities—Transfer from Base ..................................... [50,300 ] [50,300 ] Trans Regional Web Initiative ...................................................................................... [–11,300 ] Unjustified Program Growth in Operating Support for Operation New Dawn ............. [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 3,271,939 3,271,939 3,285,939 25,300 3,297,239 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ..................................................................................... 23,478 23,478 23,478 23,478 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ......................................................................... 87,925 87,925 87,925 87,925 120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ........................................................................... 164,520 164,520 164,520 164,520 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
935 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ...................................................................................... 102,322 102,322 67,322 –35,000 67,322 

Unjustified Program Growth ......................................................................................... [–35,000 ] [–35,000 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ...................................................................................................... 15,457 15,457 15,457 15,457 185 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY—OTHER ........................................................... 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,140,000 –60,000 2,140,000 

Coalition Support Funds: Excess to Need for Contract Renewal ................................. [–60,000 ] [–60,000 ] 

220 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY .................................................................. 194,100 194,100 194,100 73,000 267,100 

Transfer from Title III: Child Care and Counseling ..................................................... [73,000 ] 

260 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE .............................................................................. 143,870 143,870 143,870 143,870 

275 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .......................................................................................................... 3,065,800 3,065,800 3,065,800 –24,000 3,041,800 

Classified Adjustment ................................................................................................... [–24,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 5,997,472 5,997,472 5,902,472 –46,000 5,951,472 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................. 9,269,411 9,269,411 9,188,411 –20,700 9,248,711 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ................................................................................................... 84,200 84,200 84,200 84,200 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................... 28,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................ 20,700 20,700 10,700 20,700 

Duplicate Request for Military Pay Support Contract (requested both in SAG 121 

and 131) ................................................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 84,500 84,500 84,500 84,500 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 217,500 217,500 207,500 217,500 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE ............................................ 217,500 217,500 207,500 217,500 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............................................................................ 38,402 38,402 38,402 38,402 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................ 400 400 400 400 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................ 11,330 11,330 11,330 11,330 060 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................................................................................ 10,137 10,137 10,137 10,137 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
936 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

100 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .................................................................................................... 13,827 13,827 13,827 13,827 140 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 52 52 52 52 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 74,148 74,148 74,148 74,148 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE ............................................. 74,148 74,148 74,148 74,148 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ............................................................................................................... 31,284 31,284 31,284 31,284 

050 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 36,084 36,084 36,084 36,084 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE ............................ 36,084 36,084 36,084 36,084 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .................................................................................................... 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................. 131,000 131,000 131,000 131,000 050 BASE SUPPORT ....................................................................................................................... 6,250 6,250 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 142,050 142,050 142,050 142,050 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE .................................... 142,050 142,050 142,050 142,050 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ................................................................................................................... 89,930 89,930 89,930 89,930 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ................................................................................................................... 130,848 130,848 130,848 130,848 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
937 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................ 110,011 110,011 110,011 –10,000 100,011 

Duplicate Request for Military Pay Support Contract (Requested in both SAG 121 

and SAG 131) ........................................................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 34,788 34,788 34,788 34,788 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .................................................................................... 21,967 21,967 21,967 21,967 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 387,544 387,544 387,544 –10,000 377,544 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ............................... 387,544 387,544 387,544 –10,000 377,544 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 34,050 34,050 34,050 34,050 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................................................................................... 34,050 34,050 34,050 34,050 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD .................................. 34,050 34,050 34,050 34,050 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... 1,304,350 1,304,350 1,304,350 1,304,350 

020 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 1,667,905 1,667,905 1,432,490 –235,415 1,432,490 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ......................................................................................................................... [–235,415 ] [–235,415 ] 

030 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ................................................................................................... 751,073 751,073 751,073 751,073 040 SUSTAINMENT ......................................................................................................................... 3,331,774 3,331,774 3,033,984 –297,790 3,033,984 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ......................................................................................................................... [–297,790 ] [–297,790 ] SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ............................................................................... 7,055,102 7,055,102 6,521,897 –533,205 6,521,897 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... 1,128,584 1,128,584 1,128,584 1,128,584 

070 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 1,530,420 1,530,420 601,915 –928,505 601,915 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
938 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ......................................................................................................................... [–928,505 ] [–928,505 ] 

080 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ................................................................................................... 1,102,430 1,102,430 1,102,430 1,102,430 090 SUSTAINMENT ......................................................................................................................... 1,938,715 1,938,715 1,800,425 –138,290 1,800,425 

Revised Combined Security Transition Command—Afghanistan (CSTC-A) requirement ......................................................................................................................... [–138,290 ] [–138,290 ] SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR .............................................................................. 5,700,149 5,700,149 4,633,354 –1,066,795 4,633,354 

ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES 

110 SUSTAINMENT ......................................................................................................................... 21,187 21,187 21,187 21,187 120 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ................................................................................................... 7,344 7,344 7,344 7,344 

130 INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 150 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 1,218 1,218 1,218 1,218 

SUBTOTAL ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 44,749 44,749 44,749 44,749 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND ....................................................... 12,800,000 12,800,000 11,200,000 –1,600,000 11,200,000 

PAKISTAN COUNTERINSURGENCY FUND UNDISTRIBUTED 

010 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... 1,100,000 

Realignment of funds from Department of State ........................................................ [1,100,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................... 1,100,000 

TOTAL PAKISTAN COUNTERINSURGENCY FUND ....................................................... 1,100,000 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND POWER 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
939 

010 POWER .................................................................................................................................... 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 020 TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................... 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 030 WATER .................................................................................................................................... 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 040 OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................... 25,000 25,000 25,000 –75,000 –50,000 

Authorization Adjustment .............................................................................................. [–75,000 ] 

050 UNDISTRIBUTED ...................................................................................................................... –75,000 

Undistributed Reduction ............................................................................................... [–75,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL POWER ......................................................................................................... 475,000 475,000 400,000 –75,000 400,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND ........................................................ 475,000 475,000 400,000 –75,000 400,000 

UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 

010 UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................. –4,000,000 –4,000,000 –4,000,000 

Reduction to reflect policy change on troop strength in Afghanistan ........................ [–4,000,000 ] [–4,000,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................................... –4,000,000 –4,000,000 –4,000,000 

TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS ....................................................... –4,000,000 –4,000,000 –4,000,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................ 89,035,031 90,135,031 87,868,359 –2,824,005 86,211,026 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
940 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

MILITARY PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................... 142,828,848 142,174,158 142,347,648 –836,620 141,992,228 

Extension of CENTCOM Rest and Recuperation Benefits ......................................... [5,000 ] Increase in Authorized Strengths for Marine Corps Officers on Active Duty in 

Field Grades (Section 501) ..................................................................................... [6,000 ] 

Retain Carrier Air Wing Staff (Section 1095) ........................................................... [2,310 ] Suicide Prevention Program ...................................................................................... [5,000 ] Travel and Transportation Allowances for Non-Medical Attendants ........................ [20,000 ] Unobligated Balances (Section 421) ......................................................................... [–693,000 ] [–368,200 ] [–325,620 ] 

Hostile fire pay proration .......................................................................................... [–88,000 ] [–42,000 ] Reduction of Army Referral Bonus ............................................................................ [–25,000 ] [–21,000 ] Undistributed transfer to Title XV .............................................................................. [–448,000 ] 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

MILITARY PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................... 11,228,566 11,228,566 10,228,566 448,000 11,676,566 

Undistributed Adjustment .......................................................................................... [–1,000,000 ]

Undistributed transfer from Title IV ........................................................................... [448,000 ] 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
941 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 101,194 101,194 91,594 101,194 

Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ..................................................... [–9,600 ] 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 101,194 101,194 91,594 101,194 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE CONTAINER DECONSOLIDATION WAR RESERVE MATERIAL .............................................................................................................. 65,372 65,372 55,872 65,372 

Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ..................................................... [–9,500 ] 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 65,372 65,372 55,872 65,372 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ADJ TO MATCH CONTINUING RESOLUTION DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 31,614 31,614 31,614 31,614 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 31,614 31,614 31,614 31,614 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA .................................................................................................... 1,376,830 1,378,830 1,376,830 1,376,830 

Enhanced Commissary Stores Pilot Program ............................................................ [2,000 ] 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................................... 1,376,830 1,378,830 1,376,830 1,376,830 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND T-AKE MPF MLP ........................................................................................................................................ 425,865 425,865 425,865 –25,865 400,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
942 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Revised Mobile Landing Platform acquisition strategy ............................................ [–25,865 ] 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING .................................................................................................. 24,161 24,161 24,161 24,161 NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL .................................................................................................... 1,138 1,138 1,138 1,138 LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 92,567 92,567 92,567 92,567 DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ................................................................................................. 184,109 184,109 184,109 184,109 TAH MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................................ 40,831 40,831 40,831 40,831 STRATEGIC SEALIFT SUPPORT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 48,443 48,443 48,443 48,443 READY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................ 309,270 309,270 309,270 309,270 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ....................................................... 1,126,384 1,126,384 1,126,384 –25,865 1,100,519 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 8,148,856 8,148,856 8,148,856 8,148,856 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 16,377,272 16,377,272 16,047,272 –330,000 16,047,272 

TRICARE Historical Execution .................................................................................... [–330,000 ] [–330,000 ] 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 2,193,821 2,193,821 2,193,821 2,193,821 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 1,422,697 1,403,467 1,422,697 1,422,697 

Electronic Health Record Way Ahead ........................................................................ [–15,480 ] Virtual Electronic Health Record ............................................................................... [–3,750 ] 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 312,102 312,102 307,102 –5,000 307,102 

Contract Savings from Web Site Consolidation ........................................................ [–2,000 ] [–2,000 ] Strategic Communications ........................................................................................ [–3,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 705,347 705,347 693,647 –11,700 693,647 

Unjustified Growth for Travel .................................................................................... [–11,700 ] [–11,700 ] 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS .......................................................................................... 1,742,451 1,742,451 1,742,451 –3,611 1,738,840 

Adjustment for Civilian Pay Error ............................................................................. [–3,611 ] 

UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................................................. –153,500 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
943 

Breast Cancer Study .................................................................................................. [10,000 ] Collaborative Military-Civilian Trauma Training Programs ....................................... [3,000 ] Competitive Programs for Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders ............................ [5,000 ] Cooperative Health Care Agreements ........................................................................ [500 ] Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury .......................................................................................................................... [2,000 ] GAO Estimate of Unobligated Balances .................................................................... [–225,000 ] Mental Health Initiatives ........................................................................................... [10,000 ] Military Adaptive Sports Programs Section 582 ....................................................... [5,000 ] Pilot Program for TBI and PTSD Treatment .............................................................. [10,000 ] Prohibit TRICARE Prime Fee Increase for 1 year TBI and PTSD Initiatives ........................................................................................... [20,000 ] Traumatic Brain Injury .............................................................................................. [1,000 ] TRICARE for Certain Individual Ready Reserve members ........................................ [5,000 ] 

WOUNDED WARRIOR MILITARY ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ...................................................................... 2,935 2,935 2,935 2,935 BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE APPLIED BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................................. 33,805 33,805 33,805 33,805 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 3,694 3,694 3,694 3,694 MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................... 767 767 767 767 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 181,042 181,042 181,042 181,042 MEDICAL PRODUCTS SUPPORT AND ADVANCED CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT .................................. 167,481 167,481 167,481 167,481 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 176,345 164,235 176,345 176,345 

Electronic Health Record Way Ahead ........................................................................ [–11,360 ] Virtual Electronic Health Record ............................................................................... [–750 ] 

MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 34,559 34,559 34,559 34,559 SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH MEDICAL PROGRAM-WIDE ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 48,313 48,313 48,313 48,313 MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................ 14,765 14,765 14,765 14,765UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................................................. 2,000 

Prostate Cancer Imaging Research Initiative ........................................................... [2,000 ] 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ......................................................................................................... 632,518 604,348 632,518 632,518 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
944 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Electronic Health Record Way Ahead ........................................................................ [–28,170 ] 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 32,198,770 31,987,760 31,852,070 –350,311 31,848,459 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M .................................................................................................. 1,147,691 1,147,691 1,147,691 1,147,691 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E ............................................................................................... 406,731 406,731 406,731 406,731 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ........................................ 1,554,422 1,554,422 1,554,422 1,554,422 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE ................................................ 1,156,282 1,156,282 989,282 –2,952 1,153,330 

Office of Naval Intelligence (PC 3359) ..................................................................... [–3,500 ] PC 2360 EUCOM Tactical Analysis Team Support—Previously Denied New Start .. [–952 ] PC 9205 EUCOM Counternarcotics Operations Support—Authorization Adjustment 

for Unjustified Growth ............................................................................................ [–2,000 ] 

Strategic communications/program termination (PC 9220) ..................................... [–500 ] Undistributed Reduction—Excess to Need ............................................................... [–128,000 ] Undistributed reduction for contractor support ........................................................ [–30,000 ] Undistributed reduction to U.S. European Command’s counterdrug activities ........ [–5,000 ] 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES ....................... 1,156,282 1,156,282 989,282 –2,952 1,153,330 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 286,919 287,919 327,419 40,500 327,419 

DOD IG Inspection of Military Cemeteries, Section 562 ........................................... [1,000 ] Program increase—Growth plan ............................................................................... [40,500 ] [40,500 ] 

RDT&E ........................................................................................................................................... 1,600 1,600 4,500 2,900 4,500 

Program increase—Growth plan ............................................................................... [2,900 ] [2,900 ] 

PROCUREMENT .............................................................................................................................. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
945 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 289,519 290,519 332,919 43,400 332,919 

Creation of the Mission Force Enhancement Transfer Fund .................................... [1,000,000 ] Program Decrease ...................................................................................................... [–1,000,000 ] 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 37,900,387 37,692,377 37,410,987 –335,728 37,564,659 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ............................................................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 CONTAINER DECONSOLIDATION ..................................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ADJ TO MATCH CONTINUING RESOLUTION DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 369,013 369,013 316,413 369,013 

Reduction in funding for DoD business systems ..................................................... [–52,600 ] 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 369,013 369,013 316,413 369,013 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 641,996 641,996 641,996 641,996 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 464,869 464,869 464,869 464,869 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
946 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 95,994 95,994 95,994 95,994 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 5,548 5,548 5,548 5,548 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 751 751 751 751 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 16,859 16,859 16,859 16,859 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS .......................................................................................... 2,271 2,271 2,271 2,271 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 1,228,288 1,228,288 1,228,288 1,228,288 

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE ................................................ 486,458 486,458 486,458 –30,000 456,458 

CTF–Kabul HQ Facility—Funding No Longer Required ............................................. [–5,000 ] Mi–17s—Change in Acquisition Strategy ................................................................ [–8,000 ] Program adjustment .................................................................................................. [–7,000 ] Reduce Program Growth (Pakistan) .......................................................................... [–10,000 ] 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES ....................... 486,458 486,458 486,458 –30,000 456,458 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 11,055 11,055 11,055 11,055 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 11,055 11,055 11,055 11,055 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 2,160,814 2,160,814 2,108,214 –30,000 2,130,814 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
947 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army AFGHANISTAN Bagram Air Base Barracks, Ph 5 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 Army AFGHANISTAN Bagram Air Base Construct Drainage System, Ph 3 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 Army AFGHANISTAN Bagram Air Base Entry Control Point 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Army ALABAMA Fort Rucker Combat Readiness Center 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright Aviation Complex, Ph 3A 114,000 114,000 57,000 –57,000 57,000 Army ALASKA Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson Brigade Complex, Ph 2 74,000 74,000 74,000 74,000 

Army ALASKA Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson Organizational Parking 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 

Army ALASKA Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson Physical Fitness Facility 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 

Army CALIFORNIA Fort Irwin Infantry Squad Battle Course 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Army CALIFORNIA Fort Irwin Qualification Training Range 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 Army CALIFORNIA Presidio Monterey General Instruction Building 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Aircraft Loading Area 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Barracks 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Barracks 67,000 67,000 67,000 67,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Brigade Headquarters 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 Army COLORADO Fort Carson Control Tower 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 Army GEORGIA Fort Benning Land Acquisition 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Army GEORGIA Fort Benning Land Acquisition 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 Army GEORGIA Fort Benning Rail Loading Facility 13,600 13,600 13,600 13,600 Army GEORGIA Fort Benning Trainee Barracks Complex, Ph 3 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army GEORGIA Fort Gordon Hand Grenade Familiarization Range 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 Army GEORGIA Fort Stewart Dog Kennel 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Army GERMANY Germersheim Central Distribution Facility 21,000 21,000 0 –21,000 0 Army GERMANY Germersheim Infrastructure 16,500 16,500 0 –16,500 0 Army GERMANY Grafenwoehr Barracks 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army GERMANY Grafenwoehr Chapel 15,500 15,500 0 15,500 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
948 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army GERMANY Grafenwoehr Convoy Live Fire Range 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Army GERMANY Landstuhl Satellite Communications Center 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Army GERMANY Landstuhl Satellite Communications Center 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 Army GERMANY Oberdachstetten Automated Record Fire Range 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 Army GERMANY Stuttgart Access Control Point 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 Army GERMANY Vilseck Barracks 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Army HAWAII Fort Shafter Child Development Center 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army HAWAII Schofield Barracks Centralized Wash Facility 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Army HAWAII Schofield Barracks Combat Aviation Brigade Complex, Ph 1 73,000 73,000 73,000 73,000 Army HONDURAS Honduras Various Barracks 25,000 25,000 0 –25,000 0 Army KANSAS Forbes Air Field Deployment Support Facility 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 Army KANSAS Fort Riley Chapel 10,400 10,400 10,400 10,400 Army KANSAS Fort Riley Physical Fitness Facility 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army KANSAS Fort Riley Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Barracks 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Barracks Complex 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Physical Fitness Facility 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Scout/RECCE Gunnery Range 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar 67,000 67,000 67,000 67,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Vehicle Maintenance Facility 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Vehicle Maintenance Facility 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Knox Automated Infantry Platoon Battle Course 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Knox Battalion Complex 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 Army KOREA Camp Carroll Barracks 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 Army KOREA Camp Henry Barracks Complex 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 Army LOUISIANA Fort Polk Brigade Complex 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army LOUISIANA Fort Polk Fire Station 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 Army LOUISIANA Fort Polk Land Acquisition 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Army LOUISIANA Fort Polk Military Working Dog Facility 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Army LOUISIANA Fort Polk Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
949 

Army MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground Auto Technology Evaluation Fac, Ph 3 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 Army MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground Command and Control Facility 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Army MARYLAND Fort Meade Applied Instruction Facility 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Army MARYLAND Fort Meade Brigade Complex 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood Vehicle Maintenance Facility 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 Army NEW YORK Fort Drum Ammunition Supply Point 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 Army NEW YORK Fort Drum Chapel 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Access Roads, Ph 2 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Battle Command Training Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Brigade Complex Facilities 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg NCO Academy 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Battle Command Training Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Chapel 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Physical Fitness Facility 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Rail Deployment Facility 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Reception Station, Ph 1 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill THAAD Instruction Facility 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Army OKLAHOMA Fort Sill Vehicle Maintenance Facility 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Army OKLAHOMA McAlester Ammunition Loading Pads 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Army OKLAHOMA McAlester Railroad Tracks 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 Army SOUTH CAROLINA Fort Jackson Modified Record Fire Range 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 Army SOUTH CAROLINA Fort Jackson Trainee Barracks Complex, Ph 2 59,000 59,000 59,000 59,000 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Applied Instruction Building 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Barracks Complex 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Electronics Maintenance Facility 14,600 14,600 14,600 14,600 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Infrastructure 14,600 14,600 0 –3,000 11,600 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss JLENS Tactical Training Facility 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility 14,600 14,600 14,600 14,600 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Vehicle Maintenance Facility 24,000 24,000 0 –24,000 0 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss Water Well, Potable 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 Army TEXAS Fort Hood Operational Readiness Training Complex 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Army TEXAS Fort Hood Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar 47,000 47,000 47,000 47,000 Army TEXAS Fort Hood Vehicle Maintenance Facility 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 Army TEXAS Fort Hood Vehicle Maintenance Facility 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
950 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio Vehicle Maintenance Facility 10,400 10,400 10,400 10,400 Army TEXAS Red River Army Depot Maneuver Systems Sustainment Ctr, Ph 3 44,000 44,000 44,000 44,000 Army UTAH Dugway Proving Ground Life Sciences Test Facility Addition 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Army VIRGINIA Fort Belvoir Information Dominance Center, Ph 1 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 Army VIRGINIA Fort Belvoir Road and Infrastucture Improvements 31,000 31,000 0 –31,000 0 Army VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley Eustis Aviation Training Facility 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Air Support Operations Facilities 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Aviation Complex, Ph 1B 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Aviation Unit Complex, Ph 1A 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Battalion Complex 59,000 59,000 59,000 59,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Brigade Complex, Ph 2 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Infrastructure, Ph 1 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord Operational Readiness Training Cplx, Ph 1 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Community Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Host Nation Support 25,500 25,500 25,500 25,500 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Minor Construction 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning & Design 229,741 229,741 169,741 –45,000 184,741 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations R&D Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Supply Facilities 0 0 0 0 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Training Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Troop Housing Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
951 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Troop Housing Facilities 0 0 0 0 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities and Ground Improvements 0 10,000 0 0 

Total Military Construction, Army 3,235,991 3,305,991 2,971,391 –222,500 3,013,491 

Navy ARIZONA Yuma Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 39,515 39,515 39,515 39,515 Navy ARIZONA Yuma Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 81,897 81,897 81,897 81,897 Navy ARIZONA Yuma JSF Auxiliary Landing Field 41,373 41,373 41,373 41,373 Navy BAHRAIN ISLAND SW Asia Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 55,010 55,010 0 55,010 Navy BAHRAIN ISLAND SW Asia Waterfront Development Phase 4 45,194 45,194 0 –45,194 0 Navy CALIFORNIA Barstow Dip Tank Cleaning Facility 8,590 8,590 8,590 8,590 Navy CALIFORNIA Bridgeport Multi-Purpose Building—Addition 19,238 19,238 16,138 –3,100 16,138 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton Armory, 1ST Marine Division 12,606 12,606 12,606 12,606 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton Individual Equipment Issue Warehouse 16,411 16,411 16,411 16,411 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton Infantry Squad Defense Range 29,187 29,187 29,187 29,187 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton Intersection Bridge and Improvements 12,476 12,476 12,476 12,476 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton MV–22 Aviation Fuel Storage 6,163 6,163 6,163 6,163 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton MV–22 Aviation Pavement 18,530 18,530 18,530 18,530 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton MV–22 Double Hangar Replacement 48,345 48,345 48,345 48,345 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton New Potable Water Conveyance 113,091 113,091 113,091 113,091 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton North Area Waste Water Conveyance 78,271 78,271 78,271 78,271 Navy CALIFORNIA Coronado Multi Purpose Facility North Island 46,763 46,763 32,063 46,763 Navy CALIFORNIA Coronado Rotary Aircraft Depot Maint Fac (North Is.) 61,672 61,672 61,672 61,672 Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu E–2D AIRCREW TRAINING FACILITY 15,377 15,377 15,377 15,377 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms Child Development Center 23,743 23,743 23,743 23,743 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms Land Expansion 8,665 8,665 8,665 8,665 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms Multi-Use Operational Fitness Area 18,819 18,819 18,819 18,819 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms Tracked Vehicle Maintenance Cover 15,882 15,882 15,882 15,882 Navy DIEGO GARCIA Diego Garcia Potable Water Plant Modernization 35,444 35,444 35,444 35,444 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier Aircraft Logistics Apron 35,170 35,170 35,170 35,170 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier Bachelor Quarters 43,529 43,529 43,529 43,529 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier TAXIWAY ENHANCEMENT 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800 Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville BAMS UAS Operator Training Facility 4,482 4,482 4,482 4,482 Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville P–8A Hangar Upgrades 6,085 6,085 6,085 6,085 Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville P–8A Training Facility 25,985 25,985 25,985 25,985 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
952 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Navy FLORIDA Mayport Massey Avenue Corridor Improvements 14,998 0 14,998 14,998 Navy FLORIDA Whiting Field Applied Instruction Facilities, EOD Course 20,620 20,620 20,620 20,620 Navy GEORGIA Kings Bay Crab Island Security Enclave 52,913 52,913 52,913 52,913 Navy GEORGIA Kings Bay WRA Land/Water Interface 33,150 33,150 33,150 33,150 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas Finegayan Water Utilities 77,267 77,267 0 –77,267 0 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas North Ramp Utilities—Anderson AFB (INC) 78,654 78,654 0 –78,654 0 Navy HAWAII Barking Sands North Loop Electrical Replacement 9,679 9,679 9,679 9,679 Navy HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam Navy Information Operations Command FES Fac 7,492 7,492 7,492 7,492 

Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MCAS Operations Complex 57,704 57,704 57,704 57,704 Navy ILLINOIS Great Lakes Decentralize Steam System 91,042 91,042 91,042 91,042 Navy MARYLAND Indian Head Decentralize Steam System 67,779 67,779 67,779 67,779 Navy MARYLAND Patuxent River Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2 45,844 45,844 45,844 45,844 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune 2nd Combat Engineer Maintenance/Ops Complex 75,214 75,214 75,214 75,214 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Wallace Creek 27,439 27,439 27,439 27,439 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune Base Entry Point and Road 81,008 81,008 81,008 81,008 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune Squad Battle Course 16,821 16,821 16,821 16,821 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Cherry Point Marine Corps 

Air Station 

H–1 HELICOPTER GEARBOX REPAIR & TEST FACILITY 17,760 17,760 17,760 17,760 

Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and Apron 69,511 69,511 69,511 69,511 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River Ordnance Loading Area Additiion 9,419 9,419 9,419 9,419 Navy SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort VERTICAL LANDING PADS 21,096 21,096 21,096 21,096 Navy VIRGINIA Norfolk Bachelor Quarters, Homeport Ashore 81,304 81,304 81,304 81,304 Navy VIRGINIA Norfolk Decentralize Steam System 26,924 26,924 26,924 26,924 Navy VIRGINIA Portsmouth Controlled Industrial Facility 74,864 74,864 74,864 74,864 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Academic Instruction Facility 75,304 75,304 75,304 75,304 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 31,374 31,374 31,374 31,374 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Embassy Security Group Facilities 27,079 27,079 27,079 27,079 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Enlisted Dining Facility 5,034 5,034 5,034 5,034 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Realign Purvis Rd/Russell Rd Intersection 6,442 6,442 6,442 6,442 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
953 

Navy VIRGINIA Quantico The Basic School Student Quarters—Phase 6 28,488 28,488 28,488 28,488 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico Waste Water Treatment Plant—Upshur 9,969 9,969 9,969 9,969 Navy WASHINGTON Bremerton Integrated Dry Dock Water Treatment Fac Ph1 13,341 13,341 13,341 13,341 Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap EHW Security Force Facility (Bangor) 25,948 25,948 25,948 25,948 Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc. 1) 78,002 78,002 78,002 78,002 Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap WATERFRONT RESTRICTED AREA VEHICLE BARRIERS 17,894 17,894 17,894 17,894 Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance & Production Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning And Design 84,362 69,362 69,362 –15,000 69,362 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations R&D Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Troop Housing Facilities 0 29,998 0 0 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Constr 21,495 21,495 21,495 21,495 

Total Military Construction, Navy 2,461,547 2,491,547 2,172,622 –219,215 2,242,332 

AF ALASKA Eielson AFB Dormitory (168 RM) 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 AF ALASKA Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson Brigade Combat Team (Light) Complex, (480 RM) 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 

AF ARIZONA Davis-Monthan AFB EC–130H Simulator/Training Operations 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 AF ARIZONA Davis-Monthan AFB HC–130J Joint Use Fuel Cell 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 ADAL Aircraft Maintenance Unit 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 Squad Ops/AMU 2 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 AF CALIFORNIA Travis AFB Dormitory (144 RM) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 AF CALIFORNIA Vandenberg AFB Education Center 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 AF COLORADO U.S. Air Force Academy Construct Large Vehicle Inspection Facility 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400 AF DELAWARE Dover AFB C–5M Formal Training Unit Facility 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 AF FLORIDA Patrick AFB Air Force Technical Applications Ctr—Incr 2 79,000 49,000 79,000 79,000 AF GERMANY Ramstein AB Dormitory (192 RM) 34,697 34,697 34,697 34,697 AF GREENLAND Thule AB Dormitory (72 PN) 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas Air Freight Terminal Complex 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Clear Water Rinse Facility 7,500 7,500 0 7,500 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Conventional Munitions Maintenanc 11,700 11,700 0 11,700 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
954 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Fuel Systems Maintenance Hangar, 

Incr 1 

128,000 64,000 0 –128,000 0 

AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC Combat Communications Combat Support 9,800 9,800 9,800 9,800 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC Combat Communications Transmission Syst 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC RED HORSE Cantonment Operations Facility 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 AF ITALY Sigonella UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 AF KANSAS Fort Riley Air Support Operations Center 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 AF KOREA Osan AB Dormitory (156 RM) 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 AF LOUISIANA Barksdale AFB Mission Support Group Complex 23,500 23,500 23,500 23,500 AF MISSOURI Whiteman AFB WSA Security Control Facility 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 AF NEBRASKA Offutt AFB STRATCOM Replacement Facility Incr 1 150,000 150,000 120,000 –30,000 120,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB Communications Network Control Center 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 Add/Alter Engine Shop 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35A AGE Facility 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB ADAL Wastewater Treatment Plant 7,598 7,598 7,598 7,598 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB Dormitory (96 RM) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB Child Development Center 11,200 11,200 11,200 11,200 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB F–16 Academic Facility 5,800 5,800 5,800 5,800 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB F–16 SEAD Training Facility 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB Parallel Taxiway 07/25 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 AF NEW MEXICO Kirtland AFB AFNWC Sustainment Center 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 AF NORTH CAROLINA Pope AFB C–130 Flight Simulator 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 3–Bay Conventional Munitions Maintenance 11,800 11,800 11,800 11,800 AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 Two-Bay Phase Maintenance Dock 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB Dormitory (168 RM) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 AF QATAR Al Udeid Blatchford Preston Complex, Phase IV 37,000 37,000 0 –37,000 0 AF TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio Adv Indiv Training (AIT) Barracks (300 RM) 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 AF TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio BMT Recruit Dormitory 4, Phase IV 64,000 64,000 64,000 64,000 AF UTAH Hill AFB F–22 System Support Facility 16,500 16,500 16,500 16,500 AF UTAH Hill AFB F–35 ADAL Hangar 45E/AMU 6,800 6,800 0 –6,800 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
955 

AF VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley Eustis AIT Barracks Complex, Ph 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 AF WASHINGTON Fairchild AFB SERE Force Support Ph 2 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 AF WASHINGTON Fairchild AFB Wing Headquarters 13,600 13,600 13,600 13,600 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Community Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Community Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance & Production Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Operational Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING & DESIGN 81,913 81,913 67,913 –29,000 52,913 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Supporting Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

Total Military Construction, Air Force 1,364,858 1,330,858 1,129,858 –230,800 1,134,058 

Def-Wide ALABAMA Maxwell AFB Expand 800 Area Chiller Loop, Gunter Annex 0 0 0 2,482 2,482 Def-Wide ALABAMA Redstone Arsenal Von Braun Complex Phase IV 58,800 58,800 58,800 58,800 Def-Wide ALASKA Anchorage SOF Cold Weather Maritime Training Facility 18,400 18,400 18,400 18,400 Def-Wide ALASKA Eielson AFB Upgrade Rail Line 14,800 14,800 14,800 14,800 Def-Wide ARIZONA Davis-Monthan AFB CNS Thermal Storage 0 0 0 4,650 4,650 Def-Wide ARIZONA Davis-Monthan AFB REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility 24,118 24,118 0 –24,118 0 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton SOF Military Working Dog Facility 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton SOF Range 130 Support Projects 8,641 8,641 8,641 8,641 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Coronado SOF Support Activity Operations Facility 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Defense Distribution 

Depot-Tracy 

Replace Public Safety Center 15,500 15,500 15,500 15,500 

Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Point Loma Annex Replace Fuel Storage Facilities Incr 4 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Presidio of Monterey 1 MW Solar Grid 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA San Clemente REPLACE FUEL STORAGE TANKS & PIPELINE 21,800 21,800 21,800 21,800 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA San Joaquin/Tracy Site 400 kW Solar PV System, Building 58 Roof 0 0 0 2,860 2,860 Def-Wide COLORADO Buckley AFB Mountainview Operations Facility, Incr 1 140,932 70,932 70,432 –70,500 70,432 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
956 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Def-Wide COLORADO Fort Carson Microgrid Expansion PEV tie-in (SPIDERS) 0 0 0 4,277 4,277 Def-Wide DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bolling AFB Cooling Tower Expansion 2,070 2,070 2,070 2,070 Def-Wide DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bolling AFB DIAC Parking Garage 13,586 13,586 13,586 13,586 Def-Wide DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bolling AFB Electrical Upgrades 1,080 1,080 1,080 1,080 Def-Wide FLORIDA Eglin AFB Medical Clinic 11,600 11,600 11,600 11,600 Def-Wide FLORIDA Eglin AFB SOF Company Operations Facility (GSB) 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Def-Wide FLORIDA Eglin AFB SOF Company Operations Facility (GSTB) 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Def-Wide FLORIDA Eglin AUX 9 SOF Enclosed Engine Noise Suppressors 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 Def-Wide FLORIDA Eglin AUX 9 SOF Simulator Facility 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 Def-Wide FLORIDA MacDill AFB SOF Acquisition Center (Phase II) 15,200 15,200 15,200 15,200 Def-Wide FLORIDA Tyndall AFB Reclaimed Water Irrigation 0 0 0 3,255 3,255 Def-Wide FLORIDA Whiting Field TRUCK LOAD/UNLOAD FACILITY 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning Replace McBride Elementary School 37,205 37,205 37,205 37,205 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Gordon WHITELAW WEDGE BUILDING ADDITION 11,340 11,340 17,705 6,365 17,705 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Stewart Hospital Addition/Alteration Phase 2 72,300 72,300 72,300 72,300 Def-Wide GEORGIA MCLB Albany LFG Generator 0 0 0 3,504 3,504 Def-Wide GERMANY Ansbach Ansbach Middle/High School Addition 11,672 11,672 11,672 11,672 Def-Wide GERMANY Baumholder Replace Wetzel-Smith Elementary Schools 59,419 59,419 0 59,419 Def-Wide GERMANY Grafenwoehr Netzaberg MS School Addition 6,529 6,529 6,529 6,529 Def-Wide GERMANY Rhine Ordnance Barracks Medical Center Replacement Incr 1 70,592 70,592 0 70,592 Def-Wide GERMANY Spangdalem AB Replace Bitburg Elementary School 41,876 41,876 41,876 41,876 Def-Wide GERMANY Spangdalem AB Replace Bitburg Middle & High School 87,167 87,167 87,167 87,167 Def-Wide GERMANY Stuttgart-Patch Barracks DISA Europe Facility Upgrades 2,434 2,434 2,434 2,434 Def-Wide GUAM Naval Base Guam 4 MW Wind Farm 0 0 0 17,377 17,377 Def-Wide HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam Alter Warehouse Space 9,200 9,200 9,200 9,200 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
957 

Def-Wide HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam UPGRADE REFULER TRUCK PARKING AREA 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 

Def-Wide ILLINOIS Great Lakes Health Clinic Demolition 16,900 16,900 16,900 16,900 Def-Wide ITALY Naval Air Station Naples 345 KW Solar PV 0 0 0 2,867 2,867 Def-Wide ITALY Vicenza Replace Vicenza High School 41,864 41,864 41,864 41,864 Def-Wide JAPAN Yokota AB Replace Temp Classrm/Joan K. Mendel ES 12,236 12,236 12,236 12,236 Def-Wide JAPAN Yokota AB Replace Yokota High School 49,606 49,606 49,606 49,606 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell Hospital Addition/Alteration 56,600 56,600 56,600 56,600 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell SOF MH47 Aviation Facility 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell SOF Rotary Wing Hangar 38,900 38,900 38,900 38,900 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox GSHO Well Field for HRC 0 0 0 2,750 2,750 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox Replace Kingsolver-Pierce Elementary Schools 38,845 38,845 38,845 38,845 Def-Wide LOUISIANA Barksdale AFB Hydrant Fuel System 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Def-Wide MARSHALL ISLANDS Kwajalein Atol 468KW Solar PV System 0 0 0 6,300 6,300 Def-Wide MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground USAMRICD Replacement, Inc 4 22,850 22,850 22,850 22,850 Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval Hospital Child Development Center Addition/Alteration 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Detrick USAMRIID Stage I, Inc 6 137,600 137,600 137,600 137,600 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade High Performance Computing Capacity 29,640 29,640 0 29,640 Def-Wide MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center, Incr 1 242,900 169,600 121,400 –88,600 154,300 Def-Wide MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews Dental Clinic Replacement 22,800 22,800 22,800 22,800 Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Hanscom AFB Repair Chiller Controls B1201 0 0 0 3,609 3,609 Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Hanscom AFB Replace Hanscom Middle School 34,040 34,040 34,040 34,040 Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Westover ARB REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 23,300 23,300 23,300 23,300 Def-Wide MISSISSIPPI Columbus AFB REPLACE REFUELER PARKING FACILITY 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Def-Wide MISSISSIPPI Gulfport Medical Clinic Replacement 34,700 34,700 34,700 34,700 Def-Wide MISSOURI Arnold Data Ctr West #1 Power & Cooling Upgrade 9,253 9,253 9,253 9,253 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF ADAL Simulator Facility 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Facility 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF Apron And Taxiway 28,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF C–130 Squadron Operations Facility 10,941 10,941 10,941 10,941 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF C–130 Wash Rack Hangar 10,856 10,856 10,856 10,856 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF Hangar Aircraft Maintenance Unit 41,200 41,200 41,200 41,200 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SOF Squadron Operations Facility 17,300 17,300 17,300 17,300 Def-Wide NEW YORK Fort Drum Dental clinic Addition/Alteration 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Def-Wide NEW YORK Fort Drum Medical Clinic 15,700 15,700 15,700 15,700 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
958 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Def-Wide NEW YORK Fort Drum Retrocommission Various Buildings 0 0 0 3,500 3,500 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF Armory Facility Expansion 6,670 6,670 6,670 6,670 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Historic District GSHP & Retro Cx 0 0 0 13,400 13,400 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Hospital Alteration 57,600 57,600 57,600 57,600 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg Replace District Superintendant’s Office 3,138 3,138 3,138 3,138 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Administrative Annex 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Battalion Operations Complex 23,478 23,478 23,478 23,478 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Battalion Operations Facility 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Brigade Headquarters 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Communications Training Complex 10,758 10,758 10,758 10,758 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Entry Control Point 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Group Headquarters 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF Squadron HQ Addition 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA MCB Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization of Camp Geiger 0 0 0 6,925 6,925 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA New River Replace Delalio Elementary School 22,687 22,687 22,687 22,687 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Pope AFB SOF Training Facility 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 Def-Wide OHIO Columbus Security Enhancements 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Altus Install VCEP for 22 Buildings 0 0 0 5,700 5,700 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Altus AFB Replace Fuel Transfer Pipeline 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA DEF Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

Enclose Open-Sided Shed 3,000 3,000 0 –3,000 0 

Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA DEF Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

Replace General Purpose Warehouse 25,500 25,500 0 25,500 

Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA DEF Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

UPGRADE ACCESS CONTROL POINTS 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 

Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia Upgrade HVAC System 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Def-Wide SOUTH CAROLINA Joint Base Charleston REPLACE FUEL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION FACILITY 24,868 24,868 24,868 24,868 Def-Wide TENNESSEE Arnold AFB Provide Temp. Control Cell Cooling C1 & C2 0 0 0 3,300 3,300 Def-Wide TEXAS Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 3 136,700 86,700 109,400 –50,000 86,700 Def-Wide TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio Ambulatory Care Center Phase 3 161,300 161,300 80,600 –80,700 80,600 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
959 

Def-Wide TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio Hospital Nutrition Care Department Add/Alt 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Menwith Hill Station MHS PSC CONSTRUCTION GENERATOR PLANT 68,601 68,601 68,601 68,601 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Royal Air Force Alconbury Replace Alconbury High School 35,030 35,030 35,030 35,030 Def-Wide UTAH Camp Williams IC CNCI Data Center 1 Inc 3 246,401 246,401 123,201 –80,000 166,401 Def-Wide UTAH Tooele Army Depot Install Stirling Solar Array 0 0 0 8,200 8,200 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Charlottesville Remote Delivery Facility 10,805 10,805 10,805 10,805 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dahlgren Dahlgren E/MS School Addition 1,988 1,988 1,988 1,988 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF Building Renovation 3,814 3,814 3,814 3,814 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF Logistic Support Facility 14,402 14,402 14,402 14,402 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF Military Working Dog Facility 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Fort Belvoir Technology Center Third Floor Fit-out 54,625 54,625 0 54,625 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek—Story 

SOF Seal Team Operations Facility 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA NRO/Aerospace Data Facility—East 2 MW Bloom Box Fuel Cell 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon Heliport Control Tower/Fire Station 6,457 6,457 6,457 6,457 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon Pentagon Memorial Pedestrian Plaza 2,285 2,285 2,285 2,285 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Quantico Defense Access Road Improvements-Telegraph Rd 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Quantico DSS Headquarters Addition 42,727 42,727 42,727 42,727 Def-Wide WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Def-Wide WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis McChord SOF Company Operations Facility 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Def-Wide WASHINGTON Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pipeline 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Def-Wide WEST VIRGINIA Camp Dawson REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Contingency Construction 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Defense Access Roads 0 40,000 0 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Energy Conservation Investment Program 135,000 135,000 135,000 –135,000 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Exercise Related Construction 8,417 8,417 8,417 8,417 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Minor Construction 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,100 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design (General Reduction) 0 0 0 –55,000 –55,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
960 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 1,993 1,993 1,993 1,993 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning And Design 8,368 8,368 8,368 8,368 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 3,043 3,043 3,043 3,043 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 52,974 52,974 35,474 52,974 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning And Design 31,468 31,468 28,968 31,468 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 5,277 5,277 5,277 5,277 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning And Design 48,007 48,007 43,007 48,007 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SOF Land Acquisition 0 10,000 0 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Supporting Activities 0 0 0 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 8,876 8,876 8,876 8,876 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Milcon 6,365 6,365 0 –6,365 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Various ECIP 0 0 0 20,444 20,444 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
961 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions Planning And Design 227,498 227,498 202,498 227,498 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions Planning And Design 66,974 66,974 61,974 66,974 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions Unspecified Minor Construction 6,571 6,571 6,571 6,571 

Def-Wide WYOMING FE Warren Decentralize Base Heat Plant 0 0 0 12,600 12,600 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 3,848,757 3,705,457 3,103,663 –451,918 3,396,839 

Chem Demil COLORADO Pueblo Depot Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph XIII 15,338 15,338 15,338 15,338 Chem Demil KENTUCKY Blue Grass Army Depot Ammunition Demilitarization Ph XII 59,974 59,974 59,974 59,974 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 75,312 75,312 75,312 0 75,312 

NATO WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED NATO Security Investment Program Nato Security Investment Program 272,611 272,611 240,611 –15,000 257,611 

Total NATO Security Investment Program 272,611 272,611 240,611 –25,000 247,611 

Army NG ALABAMA Fort McClellan Readiness Center PH2 16,500 16,500 16,500 16,500 Army NG ARIZONA Papago Military Reservation Readiness Center 17,800 17,800 17,800 17,800 

Army NG ARKANSAS Fort Chaffee Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point Range 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Army NG CALIFORNIA Camp Roberts Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility 6,160 6,160 6,160 6,160 Army NG CALIFORNIA Camp Roberts Utilities Replacement Ph1 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Army NG CALIFORNIA Camp San Luis Obispo Field Maintenance Shop 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Army NG COLORADO Alamosa Readiness Center 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 Army NG COLORADO Aurora Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 Army NG COLORADO Fort Carson Barracks Complex (ORTC) 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Army NG DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia US Property & Fiscal Office Add/Alt 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 Army NG FLORIDA Camp Blanding Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point Range 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 Army NG FLORIDA Camp Blanding Live Fire Shoot House 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 Army NG GEORGIA Atlanta Readiness Center 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Army NG GEORGIA Hinesville Maneuver Area Training & Equipment Site Ph1 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army NG GEORGIA Macon Readiness Center Ph1 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 Army NG HAWAII Kalaeloa Readiness Center Ph1 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Army NG ILLINOIS Normal Readiness Center 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
962 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army NG INDIANA Camp Atterbury Deployment Processing Facility 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 Army NG INDIANA Camp Atterbury Operations Readiness Training Cmplx 2 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Army NG INDIANA Camp Atterbury Operations Readiness Training Complex 1 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Army NG INDIANA Camp Atterbury Railhead Expansion & Container Facility 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Army NG INDIANA Indianapolis JFHQ Add/Alt 25,700 25,700 25,700 25,700 Army NG MAINE Bangor Readiness Center 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 Army NG MAINE Brunswick Armed Forces Reserve Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army NG MARYLAND Dundalk Readiness Center Add/Alt 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Army NG MARYLAND La Plata Readiness Center 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Army NG MARYLAND Westminster Readiness Center Add/Alt 10,400 10,400 10,400 10,400 Army NG MASSACHUSETTS Natick Readiness Center 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Army NG MINNESOTA Camp Ripley Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby Deployment Processing Facility 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby Operational Readiness Training Cmplx Ph1 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby Troop Housing (ORTC) Ph1 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Army NG NEBRASKA Grand Island Readiness Center 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Army NG NEBRASKA Mead Readiness Center 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Army NG NEVADA Las Vegas Field Maintenance Shop 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Army NG NEW JERSEY Lakehurst Army Aviation Suport Facility 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 Army NG NEW MEXICO Santa Fe Readiness Center Add/Alt 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 Army NG NORTH CAROLINA Greensboro Readiness Center Add/Alt 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 Army NG OKLAHOMA Camp Gruber Live Fire Shoot House 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Army NG OKLAHOMA Camp Gruber Upgrade-Combined Arms Collective Training Fac 10,361 10,361 10,361 10,361 Army NG OREGON The Dalles Readiness Center 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 Army NG PUERTO RICO Fort Buchanan Readiness Center 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Allendale Readiness Center Add/Alt 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 Army NG UTAH Camp Williams Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Army NG VIRGINIA Fort Pickett Combined Arms Collective Training Facility 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Army NG WEST VIRGINIA Buckhannon Readiness Center Ph1 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Army NG WISCONSIN Camp Williams Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
963 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance & Production Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance & Production Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Operational Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 20,671 20,671 20,671 20,671 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Training Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Construction 0 0 0 0 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 

Army NG WYOMING Cheyenne Readiness Center 8,900 8,900 8,900 8,900 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 773,592 823,592 773,592 0 773,592 

Army Res CALIFORNIA Fort Hunter Liggett Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun (MPMG) 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 Army Res COLORADO Fort Collins Army Reserve Center 13,600 13,600 13,600 13,600 Army Res ILLINOIS Homewood Army Reserve Center 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Army Res ILLINOIS Rockford Army Reserve Center/Land 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 Army Res INDIANA Fort Benjamin Harrison Army Reserve Center 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 Army Res KANSAS Kansas City Army Reserve Center/Land 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army Res MASSACHUSETTS Attleboro Army Reserve Center/Land 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Army Res MINNESOTA Saint Joseph Army Reserve Center 11,800 11,800 11,800 11,800 Army Res MISSOURI Weldon Springs Army Reserve Center 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Army Res NEW YORK Schenectady Army Reserve Center 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Army Res NORTH CAROLINA Greensboro Army Reserve Center/Land 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Army Res SOUTH CAROLINA Orangeburg Army Reserve Center/Land 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy Automated Record Fire Range 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy Container Loading Facility 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy Modified Record Fire Known Distance Range 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy NCOA Phase III—Billeting 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 28,924 28,924 28,924 28,924 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
964 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 2,925 2,925 2,925 2,925 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 280,549 280,549 280,549 0 280,549 

N/MC Res PENNSYLVANIA Pittsburg Armed Forces Reserve Center (Pittsburgh) 13,759 13,759 13,759 13,759 N/MC Res TENNESSEE Memphis Reserve Training Center 7,949 7,949 7,949 7,949 N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MCNR Unspecified Minor Construction 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning And Design 2,591 2,591 2,591 2,591 

Total Military Construction, Naval Reserve 26,299 26,299 26,299 0 26,299 

Air NG CALIFORNIA Beale AFB Wing Operations and Training Facility 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,100 Air NG CALIFORNIA Moffett Field Replace Pararescue Training Facility 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Air NG HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam TFI—F–22 Combat Aircraft Parking Apron 12,721 0 12,721 12,721 

Air NG HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam TFI—F–22 Flight Simulator Facility 19,800 19,800 19,800 19,800 

Air NG HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam TFI—F–22 Weapons Load Crew Training Facilit 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

Air NG INDIANA Fort Wayne IAP A–10 Facility Conversion—Munitions 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Air NG MARYLAND Martin State Airport TFI—C–27 Conversion - Squadron Operations 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 Air NG MASSACHUSETTS Otis ANGB TFI—cNAF Beddown - Upgrade Facility 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 Air NG OHIO Springfield Beckley-MAP Alter Predator Operations Center 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance & Production Facilities 0 20,000 0 0 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Operational Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
965 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions Planning and Design 12,225 12,225 12,225 12,225 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 116,246 133,525 116,246 0 116,246 

AF Res CALIFORNIA March AFB Airfield Control Tower/Base Ops 16,393 16,393 16,393 16,393 AF Res SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston AFB TFI Red Horse Readiness & Trng Center 9,593 9,593 9,593 9,593 AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning & Design 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 

AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Training Facilities 0 10,000 0 0 

AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Unspecified Minor Construction 5,434 5,434 5,434 5,434 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 33,620 43,620 33,620 0 33,620 

FH Con Army BELGIUM Brussels Land Purchase for GFOQ (10 units) 10,000 10,000 0 –10,000 0 FH Con Army GERMANY Grafenwoehr Family Housing New Construction (26 units) 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 FH Con Army GERMANY Illesheim Family Housing Replacement Construc(80 units) 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 FH Con Army GERMANY Vilseck Family Housing New Construction (22 units) 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 FH Con Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Construction Improvements (276 units) 103,000 103,000 103,000 103,000 

FH Con Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Family Housing P&D 7,897 7,897 7,897 7,897 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army 186,897 186,897 176,897 –10,000 176,897 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 14,256 14,256 14,256 14,256 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing 204,426 204,426 204,426 204,426 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance of Real Property 105,668 105,668 105,668 105,668 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Management Account 54,728 54,728 54,728 54,728 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Miscellaneous Account 605 605 605 605 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Privatization Support Costs 25,741 25,741 25,741 25,741 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
966 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Services Account 15,797 15,797 15,797 15,797 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities Account 73,637 73,637 73,637 73,637 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army 494,858 494,858 494,858 0 494,858 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Classified Improvements 50 50 50 50 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Construction Improvements 80,546 80,546 80,546 80,546 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Planning and Design 4,208 4,208 4,208 4,208 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 84,804 84,804 84,804 0 84,804 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 35,290 35,290 35,290 35,290 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Housing Privatization 47,571 47,571 47,571 47,571 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing 80,775 80,775 80,775 80,775 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing Account 122 122 122 122 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance (RPMA & RPMC) 98,132 98,132 98,132 98,132 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance Account 2,001 2,001 2,001 2,001 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Management Account 55,395 55,395 55,395 55,395 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Management Account 1,996 1,996 1,996 1,996 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
967 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Miscellaneous Account 2,165 2,165 2,165 2,165 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Services Account 13,675 13,675 13,675 13,675 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities Account 67,639 67,639 67,639 67,639 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force 404,761 404,761 404,761 0 404,761 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Design 3,199 3,199 3,199 3,199 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Improvements 97,773 97,773 97,773 97,773 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps 100,972 100,972 100,972 0 100,972 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 15,979 15,979 15,979 15,979 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing 79,798 79,798 79,798 79,798 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance Of Real Property 97,231 97,231 97,231 97,231 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Management Account 61,090 61,090 61,090 61,090 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Miscellaneous Account 476 476 476 476 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Privatization Support Costs 28,582 28,582 28,582 28,582 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Services Account 14,510 14,510 14,510 14,510 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities Account 70,197 70,197 70,197 70,197 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine Corps 367,863 367,863 367,863 0 367,863 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 70 70 70 70 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 19 19 19 19 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
968 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Furnishings Account 2,699 2,699 2,699 2,699 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing 10,100 10,100 10,100 10,100 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Leasing 36,552 36,552 36,552 36,552 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance Of Real Property 70 70 70 70 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Maintenance Of Real Property 546 546 546 546 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Management Account 347 347 347 347 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Services Account 30 30 30 30 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities Account 280 280 280 280 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Utilities Account 10 10 10 10 

Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide 50,723 50,723 50,723 0 50,723 

HOAP WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Homeowers Assistance Program 1,284 1,284 1,284 1,284 

Total Homeowners Assistance Fund 1,284 1,284 1,284 0 1,284 

FHIF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations Family Housing Improvement Fund 2,184 2,184 2,184 2,184 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 2,184 2,184 2,184 0 2,184 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations COMM ADD 3: GALENA FOL, AK 933 933 933 –933 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
969 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–100: PLANING, DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT 6,090 6,090 6,090 –6,090 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–101: VARIOUS LOCATIONS 5,021 5,021 5,021 –5,021 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–126: NSCS, ATHENS, GA 325 325 325 –325 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–138: NAS BRUNSWICK, ME 421 421 421 –421 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–157: MCSA KANSAS CITY, MO 1,442 1,442 1,442 –1,442 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–158: NSA NEW ORLEANS, LA 2,056 2,056 2,056 –2,056 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–172: NWS SEAL BEACH, CONCORD, CA 9,763 9,763 9,763 –9,763 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–2: NS PASCAGOULA, MS 515 515 515 –515 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–84: JRB WILLOW GROVE & CAMBRIA REG AP 196 196 196 –196 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–106: KANSAS ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT, KS 45,769 45,769 45,769 –45,769 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–110: MISSISSIPPI ARMY AMMO PLANT, MS 122 122 122 –122 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–112: RIVER BANK ARMY AMMO PLANT, CA 320 320 320 –320 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–117: DESERET CHEMICAL DEPOT, UT 34,011 34,011 34,011 –34,011 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–119: NEWPORT CHEMICAL DEPOT, IN 467 467 467 –467 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–120: UMATILLA CHEMICAL DEPOT, OR 9,092 9,092 9,092 –9,092 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IND–122: LONE STAR ARMY AMMO PLANT, TX 19,367 19,367 19,367 –19,367 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations INT–4: NGA ACTIVITIES 1,791 1,791 1,791 –1,791 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
970 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title Budget Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MED–2: WALTER REED NMMC, BETHESDA, MD 18,586 18,586 18,586 –18,586 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MED–57: BROOKS CITY BASE, TX 205 205 205 –205 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PROGRAM MANAGEMENT VARIOUS LOCATIONS 828 828 828 –828 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PROGRAM MANAGEMENT VARIOUS LOCATIONS 32,298 32,298 32,298 –32,298 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–113: FORT MONROE, VA 23,601 23,601 23,601 –23,601 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–121: FORT GILLEM, GA 8,903 8,903 8,903 –8,903 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–131: USAR COMMAND AND CONTROL -SE 250 250 250 –250 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–166: USAR COMMAND AND CONTROL—NW 1,000 1,000 1,000 –1,000 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–167: USAR COMMAND AND CONTROL—NE 250 250 250 –250 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–168: USAR COMMAND AND CONTROL—SW 250 250 250 –250 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–222: FORT MCPHERSON, GA 9,921 9,921 9,921 –9,921 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–223: FORT MONMOUTH, NJ 21,908 21,908 21,908 –21,908 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–242: RC TRANSFORMATION IN NY 259 259 259 –259 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–36: RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT 1,207 1,207 1,207 –1,207 0 

BRAC 05 WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USA–63: U.S. ARMY GARRISON (SELFRIDGE) 1,609 1,609 1,609 –1,609 0 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
971 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 2005 258,776 258,776 258,776 –258,776 0 

BRAC IV WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE Base Realignment & Closure 0 0 0 0 

BRAC IV WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE, AIR FORCE Base Realignment & Closure 123,476 123,476 123,476 123,476 

BRAC IV WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE, ARMY Base Realignment & Closure 70,716 70,716 70,716 70,716 

BRAC IV WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE, NAVY Base Realignment & Closure 129,351 129,351 129,351 129,351 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 1990 323,543 323,543 323,543 0 323,543 

PYS Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations Prior Year Savings-Air Force 0 0 0 –32,000 –32,000 

PYS Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations Prior Year Savings-Defense-Wide 0 0 0 –131,400 –131,400 

PYS Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations Prior Year Savings-Navy 0 0 0 –25,000 –25,000 

PYS Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations Prior Year Savings-Army 0 0 0 –100,000 –100,000 

Total Prior Year Savings 0 0 0 –288,400 –288,400 Total Division B 14,766,047 14,766,026 13,190,428 –1,696,609 13,069,438 

Grand Total 14,766,047 14,766,026 13,190,428 –1,696,609 13,069,438 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
972 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE ................................................................................ 6,187 6,187 0 –6,187 0 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................... 7,629,716 7,629,716 7,628,716 –355,387 7,274,329 DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ........................................................................... 2,549,492 2,569,492 2,378,679 –216,189 2,333,303 NAVAL REACTORS .............................................................................................................. 1,153,662 1,153,662 1,153,662 –73,662 1,080,000 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR ....................................................................................... 450,060 450,060 405,092 –67,360 382,700 

Total, National nuclear security administration ..................................................................... 11,782,930 11,802,930 11,566,149 –712,598 11,070,332 Environmental and other defense activities: 

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ................................................................................ 5,406,781 5,406,781 5,160,126 –383,781 5,023,000 OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................. 859,952 859,952 859,952 –36,588 823,364 DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL ............................................................................... 0 0 0 0 0 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities .................................................................... 6,266,733 6,266,733 6,020,078 –420,369 5,846,364 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities .......................................................................................... 18,049,663 18,069,663 17,586,227 –1,132,967 16,916,696 

Total, Discretionary Funding ............................................................................................................................... 18,055,850 18,075,850 17,586,227 –1,132,967 16,916,696 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration ...................................................................................... 6,187 6,187 0 –6,187 0 

Weapons Activities 

Directed stockpile work 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
973 

Life extension programs 

B61 Life extension program ....................................................................................................... 223,562 223,562 223,562 223,562 W76 Life extension program ...................................................................................................... 257,035 257,035 257,035 257,035 

Total, Life extension programs ......................................................................................................... 480,597 480,597 480,597 0 480,597 Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 72,396 72,396 72,396 72,396 

W76 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 63,383 63,383 63,383 63,383 

W78 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 109,518 109,518 107,518 –10,000 99,518 W80 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 44,444 44,444 44,444 44,444 B83 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 48,215 48,215 48,215 48,215 

W87 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 83,943 83,943 83,943 83,943 

W88 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 75,728 75,728 75,728 75,728 

Total, Stockpile systems .................................................................................................................... 497,627 497,627 495,627 –10,000 487,627 Weapons dismantlement and disposition 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 56,770 56,770 56,770 56,770 

Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition .............................................................................. 56,770 56,770 56,770 0 56,770 Stockpile services 

Production support ..................................................................................................................... 354,502 354,502 354,502 –24,502 330,000 

Research and development support .......................................................................................... 30,264 30,264 30,264 30,264 

R&D certification and safety ..................................................................................................... 190,892 190,892 190,892 –25,323 165,569 Management, technology, and production ................................................................................. 198,700 198,700 198,700 –10,000 188,700 Plutonium sustainment .............................................................................................................. 154,231 154,231 154,231 –14,231 140,000 

Total, Stockpile services ................................................................................................................... 928,589 928,589 928,589 –74,056 854,533 

Total, Directed stockpile work ................................................................................................................... 1,963,583 1,963,583 1,961,583 –84,056 1,879,527 Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification ............................................................................................................... 94,929 94,929 94,929 –54,929 40,000 

Primary assessment technologies .............................................................................................. 86,055 86,055 86,055 86,055 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
974 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Dynamic materials properties .................................................................................................... 111,836 111,836 111,836 –14,852 96,984 Advanced radiography ................................................................................................................ 27,058 27,058 27,058 –1,058 26,000 Secondary assessment technologies .......................................................................................... 86,061 86,061 86,061 –1,061 85,000 

Total, Science campaign ................................................................................................................... 405,939 405,939 405,939 –71,900 334,039 Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ......................................................................................................................... 41,696 41,696 41,696 41,696 Weapon systems engineering assessment technology .............................................................. 15,663 15,663 15,663 15,663 Nuclear survivability .................................................................................................................. 19,545 19,545 19,545 19,545 Enhanced surveillance ............................................................................................................... 66,174 66,174 66,174 66,174 

Total, Engineering campaign ............................................................................................................. 143,078 143,078 143,078 0 143,078 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign 

Ignition ....................................................................................................................................... 109,888 109,888 109,888 109,888 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ................................................................... 86,259 86,259 91,259 86,259 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion ................................................................................. 4,997 4,997 4,997 4,997 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas ....................................................... 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Facility operations and target production ................................................................................. 266,030 266,030 266,030 266,030 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign ......................................................... 476,274 476,274 481,274 0 476,274 

Advanced simulation and computing campaign .............................................................................. 628,945 628,945 628,945 –8,945 620,000 Readiness Campaign 

Nonnuclear readiness ................................................................................................................. 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Tritium readiness ....................................................................................................................... 77,491 77,491 70,491 –13,900 63,591 

Total, Readiness campaign ............................................................................................................... 142,491 142,491 135,491 –13,900 128,591 

Total, Campaigns ......................................................................................................................................... 1,796,727 1,796,727 1,794,727 –94,745 1,701,982 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
975 

Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) 

Operations of facilities 

Kansas City Plant ...................................................................................................................... 156,217 156,217 151,217 156,217 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ................................................................................... 83,990 83,990 83,990 83,990 Los Alamos National Laboratory ................................................................................................ 318,526 318,526 318,526 318,526 Nevada Test Site ........................................................................................................................ 97,559 97,559 97,559 97,559 

Pantex ......................................................................................................................................... 164,848 164,848 164,848 164,848 Sandia National Laboratory ....................................................................................................... 120,708 120,708 120,708 120,708 

Savannah River Site .................................................................................................................. 97,767 97,767 97,767 97,767 Y–12 National security complex ................................................................................................ 246,001 246,001 246,001 246,001 Institutional site support ........................................................................................................... 199,638 199,638 199,638 –199,638 0 

Total, Operations of facilities ........................................................................................................... 1,485,254 1,485,254 1,480,254 –199,638 1,285,616 Program readiness .............................................................................................................................. 74,180 74,180 74,180 74,180 

Material recycle and recovery ............................................................................................................. 85,939 85,939 85,939 –7,939 78,000 

Containers ........................................................................................................................................... 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 

Storage ................................................................................................................................................ 31,272 31,272 31,272 31,272 

Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities ............................................................................... 1,705,624 1,705,624 1,700,624 –207,577 1,498,047 

Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ...................................................................................... 9,881 9,881 9,881 9,881 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project, LANL ......................................................................... 19,402 19,402 19,402 –9,402 10,000 10-D–501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y–12 National security complex, Oakridge, TN ... 35,387 35,387 35,387 35,387 09–D–404 Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, 

NM .......................................................................................................................................... 25,168 25,168 25,168 25,168 

08–D–802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, Amerillo, TX ................................... 66,960 66,960 66,960 66,960 07–D–140 Project engineering and design (PED) various locations ....................................... 3,518 3,518 3,518 3,518 06–D–141 Project engineering & design (PED) Y–12 National Security Complex, Oakridge, 

TN ........................................................................................................................................... 160,194 160,194 160,194 160,194 

04–D–125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement project, Los Alamos National 

Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM .................................................................................................. 300,000 300,000 300,000 –100,000 200,000 

Total, Construction ............................................................................................................................. 620,510 620,510 620,510 –109,402 511,108 

Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities .................................................................................... 2,326,134 2,326,134 2,321,134 –316,979 2,009,155 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
976 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment ................................................................................................................. 149,274 149,274 149,274 –4,000 145,274 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 101,998 101,998 101,998 –3,996 98,002 

Total, Secure transportation asset ............................................................................................................ 251,272 251,272 251,272 –7,996 243,276 

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response ........................................................................................... 222,147 222,147 222,147 222,147 

Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program 

Operations and maintenance .............................................................................................................. 96,380 96,380 96,380 96,380 

Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program ................................................................. 96,380 96,380 96,380 0 96,380 Site stewardship 

Operations and maintenance .............................................................................................................. 104,002 104,002 104,002 –25,322 78,680 

Total, Site stewardship ............................................................................................................................... 104,002 104,002 104,002 –25,322 78,680 Safeguards and security 

Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 711,105 711,105 711,105 –24,853 686,252 Construction: 

08–D–701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los Alamos National Laboratory .... 11,752 11,752 9,752 11,752 

Total, Construction .................................................................................................................... 11,752 11,752 9,752 0 11,752 

Total, Defense nuclear security ........................................................................................................ 722,857 722,857 720,857 –24,853 698,004 

Cyber security ...................................................................................................................................... 126,614 126,614 126,614 126,614 

Total, Safeguards and security .................................................................................................................. 849,471 849,471 847,471 –24,853 824,618 National security applications ................................................................................................................... 20,000 20,000 30,000 –10,000 10,000 

Subtotal, Weapons activities ............................................................................................................................... 7,629,716 7,629,716 7,628,716 –563,951 7,065,765 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
977 

Legacy Contractor Pensions ...................................................................................................................... 0 168,232 168,232 

Recission ..................................................................................................................................................... 40,332 40,332 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0 

Total, Weapons Activities .................................................................................................................................... 7,629,716 7,629,716 7,628,716 –355,387 7,274,329 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Nonproliferation and verification R&D 

Operations and maintenance .............................................................................................................. 417,598 417,598 426,959 –61,448 356,150 Total, Operations and maintenance .................................................................................................. 417,598 417,598 426,959 –61,448 356,150 

Total, Nonproliferation & verification R&D ............................................................................................... 417,598 417,598 426,959 –61,448 356,150 Nonproliferation and international security .............................................................................................. 161,833 161,833 159,833 –6,528 155,305 International nuclear materials protection and cooperation .................................................................. 571,639 571,639 571,639 571,639 Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ................................................................................................ 274,790 274,790 234,790 –69,158 205,632 U.S. uranium disposition .................................................................................................. 26,435 26,435 26,435 –435 26,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance ......................................................................................... 301,225 301,225 261,225 –69,593 231,632 Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC ............................ 385,172 385,172 385,172 50,000 435,172 99–D–141–01 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, Savannah River, SC ................ 176,000 176,000 48,000 –176,000 0 99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC ................................ 17,582 17,582 17,582 17,582 

Total, Construction .................................................................................................................... 578,754 578,754 450,754 –126,000 452,754 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition .............................................................................. 879,979 879,979 711,979 –195,593 684,386 Russian surplus materials disposition ............................................................................................... 10,174 10,174 0 –9,174 1,000 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ............................................................................................................ 890,153 890,153 711,979 –204,767 685,386 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
978 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Global threat reduction initiative ................................................................................................................ 508,269 528,269 508,269 –8,269 500,000 Legacy contractor pensions ......................................................................................................................... 0 55,823 55,823 Recission ...................................................................................................................................................... 9,000 9,000 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................................................................................ 2,549,492 2,569,492 2,378,679 –216,189 2,333,303 

Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors development OHIO replacement reactor systems development .................................................................................... 0 121,300 121,300 S8G Prototype refueling ............................................................................................................................. 0 99,500 99,500 Naval reactors operations and infrastructure .......................................................................................... 0 358,300 358,300 

Operation and maintenance 

Operation and maintenance ...................................................................................................... 1,069,262 1,069,262 1,069,262 –648,262 421,000 

Total, Operation and maintenance ................................................................................................... 1,069,262 1,069,262 1,069,262 –69,162 1,000,100 Construction: 

10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL .......................................................................................... 100 100 100 100 10-D–904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho ........................................................................ 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID ................................................................................................................................. 27,800 27,800 27,800 27,800 

Total, Construction ............................................................................................................................. 39,900 39,900 39,900 0 39,900 

Total, Naval reactors development ............................................................................................................ 1,109,162 1,109,162 1,109,162 –648,262 460,900 Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 44,500 44,500 44,500 –4,500 40,000 

Total, Naval Reactors .......................................................................................................................................... 1,153,662 1,153,662 1,153,662 –73,662 1,080,000 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator .......................................................................................................................... 450,060 450,060 405,092 –40,060 410,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
979 

Floor amendment Congressionally directed projects ................................................................................................................ 0 0 0 0 

Subtotal, Office of the Administrator ................................................................................................................. 450,060 450,060 405,092 –40,060 410,000 General Provision 

Section 309–Contractor Pay Freeze ............................................................................................................. 0 –27,300 –27,300 

Security 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0 

Subtotal, Office of the Administrator ................................................................................................................. 450,060 450,060 405,092 –67,360 382,700 

Transfer of prior year balances (OMB scoring) .................................................................................. 0 0 0 0 

Total, Office Of The Administrator ...................................................................................................................... 450,060 450,060 405,092 –67,360 382,700 Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ............................................................................................................... 5,375 5,375 5,375 5,375 

Total, Closure sites ..................................................................................................................................... 5,375 5,375 5,375 0 5,375 

Hanford site: 

Central plateau remediation ............................................................................................................... 0 546,890 River corridor and other cleanup operations ...................................................................................... 0 20,000 386,822 Nuclear facility D&D—remainder of Hanford .................................................................................... 56,288 56,288 56,288 Nuclear facility D&D river corridor closure project ............................................................................ 330,534 330,534 330,534 Richland community and regulatory support ..................................................................................... 0 19,540 19,540 Nuclear material stabilization and disposition PFP ........................................................................... 48,458 48,458 48,458 SNF stabilization and disposition ....................................................................................................... 112,250 112,250 112,250 Soil and water remediation—groundwater vadose zone ................................................................... 222,285 222,285 222,285 Solid waste stabilization and disposition 200 area .......................................................................... 143,897 143,897 143,897 

Total, Hanford site ...................................................................................................................................... 913,712 913,712 913,712 39,540 953,252 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
980 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ................................................................................................ 0 382,769 SNF stabilization and disposition—2012 .......................................................................................... 20,114 20,114 20,114 Solid waste stabilization and disposition .......................................................................................... 165,035 165,035 165,035 Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ............................................................. 110,169 110,169 110,169 Soil and water remediation—2012 .................................................................................................... 87,451 87,451 87,451 Idaho community and regulatory support .......................................................................................... 0 0 0 4,100 4,100 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ............................................................................................................... 382,769 382,769 382,769 4,100 386,869 NNSA sites 

NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ....................................................................................................... 0 282,393 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ............................................................................................ 873 873 873 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit .............................................................. 1,500 1,500 1,500 Nevada ................................................................................................................................................ 63,380 63,380 63,380 Los Alamos National Laboratory ......................................................................................................... 357,939 357,939 188,939 Sandia National Laboratory 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ..................................................................................................... 423,692 423,692 254,692 –141,299 282,393 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 

Building 3019 ..................................................................................................................................... 0 37,000 

OR nuclear facility D&D ...................................................................................................................... 0 69,100 Nuclear facility D & D ORNL .............................................................................................................. 44,000 44,000 44,000 

Nuclear facility D & D Y–12 ............................................................................................................... 30,000 30,000 30,000 Nuclear facility D & D, E. Tennessee technology park ...................................................................... 100 100 100 OR cleanup and disposition ............................................................................................................... 0 87,000 OR reservation community and regulatory support Soil and water remediation—offsites .............. 3,000 3,000 3,000 17,000 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
981 

OR reservation community and regulatory support Soil and water remediation—offsites .............. 0 0 0 6,409 6,409 Solid waste stabilization and disposition—2012 .............................................................................. 99,000 99,000 99,000 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ..................................................................................................................... 176,100 176,100 176,100 23,409 199,509 

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

Waste treatment & immobilization plant 01–D–16 A–D .......................................................... 363,000 67,000 430,000 Waste treatment & immobilization plant 01–D–16 E .............................................................. 477,000 –167,000 310,000 

Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant ........................................................................... 840,000 0 0 –100,000 740,000 Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ................................................................ 521,391 521,391 467,001 –76,391 445,000 

Total, Tank farm activities ................................................................................................................ 521,391 521,391 467,001 –76,391 445,000 

Total, Office of River protection ................................................................................................................ 1,361,391 521,391 467,001 –176,391 1,185,000 Savannah River site: 

Savannah River community and regulatory support .......................................................................... 0 9,584 Nuclear material stabilization and disposition .................................................................................. 235,000 235,000 245,000 Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ............................................................. 710,487 710,487 677,222 –43,406 667,081 SR site risk management operations ................................................................................................. 0 343,586 PE&D Glass Waste Storage Building #3 ............................................................................................ 0 3,500 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River .............................................................. 170,071 170,071 170,071 170,071 Soil and water remediation ................................................................................................................ 38,409 SNF stabilization and disposition ....................................................................................................... 40,137 40,137 40,137 Solid waste stabilization and disposition .......................................................................................... 30,040 30,040 30,040 

Total, Savannah River site ......................................................................................................................... 1,224,144 1,185,735 1,162,470 –30,322 1,193,822 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ........................................................................................................................ 0 215,134 

Waste isolation pilot plant ................................................................................................................. 147,136 147,136 147,136 –13,792 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
982 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2012 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Conference Change Conference Authorized 

Central characterization project ......................................................................................................... 23,975 23,975 23,975 Transportation ..................................................................................................................................... 29,044 29,044 29,044 Community and regulatory support .................................................................................................... 28,771 28,771 28,771 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .............................................................................................................. 228,926 228,926 228,926 –13,792 215,134 

Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 321,628 321,628 321,628 321,628 Program Support .......................................................................................................................................... 0 20,380 20,380 Community, regulatory and program support ............................................................................................. 91,279 91,279 91,279 Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation ........................................................................................................................ 17,300 17,300 17,300 17,300 Paducah .............................................................................................................................................. 9,435 9,435 9,435 9,435 Portsmouth .......................................................................................................................................... 16,412 16,412 16,412 16,412 Richland/Hanford Site ......................................................................................................................... 69,234 69,234 69,234 69,234 Savannah River Site ........................................................................................................................... 130,000 130,000 130,000 3,193 133,193 Waste Isolation Pilot Project ............................................................................................................... 4,845 4,845 4,845 4,845 West Valley .......................................................................................................................................... 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 

Total, Safeguards and Security .................................................................................................................. 248,826 248,826 248,826 3,193 252,019 

Technology development .............................................................................................................................. 32,320 32,320 32,320 –21,320 11,000 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup ......................................................................................................... 5,410,162 4,531,753 4,285,098 –383,781 5,026,381 

Use of prior year balances .......................................................................................................................... –3,381 –3,381 –3,381 –3,381 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup ............................................................................................................... 5,406,781 4,528,372 4,281,717 –383,781 5,023,000 Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security ................................................................................................................. 349,445 349,445 349,445 –14,009 335,436 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
983 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 107,037 107,037 107,037 –5,037 102,000 

Total, Health, safety and security ............................................................................................................. 456,482 456,482 456,482 –19,046 437,436 Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management ........................................................................................................................... 157,514 157,514 157,514 157,514 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 12,586 12,586 12,586 –500 12,086 

Total, Office of Legacy Management ......................................................................................................... 170,100 170,100 170,100 –500 169,600 Defense-related activities 

Infrastructure 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ................................................................................... 98,500 98,500 98,500 –5,150 93,350 

Total, Defense-related activities ................................................................................................................ 98,500 98,500 98,500 –5,150 93,350 Defense related administrative support ...................................................................................................... 118,836 118,836 118,836 118,836 Acquisitions workforce improvement ........................................................................................................... 11,892 11,892 11,892 –11,892 0 Office of hearings and appeals ................................................................................................................... 4,142 4,142 4,142 4,142 

Total, Other Defense Activities ........................................................................................................................... 859,952 z 859,952 –36,588 823,364 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
984 

DIVISION E—SBIR AND STTR REAUTHORIZATION 

Reauthorization of the SBIR and STTR programs (sec. 5001–5168) 

The Senate amendment contained several provisions (secs. 

5001–5503) that would reauthorize the Small Business Innovation 

Research (SBIR) and the Small Business Technology Transfer 

(STTR) programs for 8 years. The SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act 

of 2011 gradually increases the SBIR allocation from 2.5 percent to 

3.5 percent and the STTR allocation from 0.3 percent to 0.6 percent. In addition, it allows entities majority-owned by multiple venture capital firms to compete for SBIR awards. 

The House bill contained no similar provisions. 

The House recedes and the conferees agree to reauthorize 

SBIR and STTR for 6 years. The SBIR allocation will increase incrementally from 2.5 percent to 3.2 percent and the STTR allocation will increase incrementally from 0.3 percent to 0.45 percent. 

The conference agreement also expands the allowance of venture 

capital firms to include participation by firms that are majority 

owned by multiple hedge funds or private equity firms. 

From the Committee on Armed Services, for consideration of 

the House bill and the Senate amendment, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, 

ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, 

MAC THORNBERRY, 

W. TODD AKIN, 

JEFF MILLER, 

FRANK A. LOBIONDO, 

MICHAEL R. TURNER, 

JOHN KLINE, 

MIKE ROGERS of Alabama, 

BILL SHUSTER, 

K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, 

ROBERT J. WITTMAN, 

DUNCAN HUNTER, 

THOMAS J. ROONEY, 

ROBERT T. SCHILLING, 

TIM GRIFFIN, 

ALLEN B. WEST, 

ADAM SMITH, 

SILVESTRE REYES, 

LORETTA SANCHEZ, 

MIKE MCINTYRE, 

ROBERT E. ANDREWS, 

SUSAN A. DAVIS, 

JAMES R. LANGEVIN, 

RICK LARSEN, 

JIM COOPER, 

JOE COURTNEY, 

DAVID LOEBSACK, 

NIKI TSONGAS, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
985 

From the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for consideration of matters within the jurisdiction of that committee 

under clause 11 of rule X: 

MIKE ROGERS of Michigan, 

C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, 

From the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for consideration of secs. 548 amd 572 of the House bill, and secs. 572 

and 573 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

THOMAS E. PETRI, 

JOSEPH J. HECK, 

From the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for consideration of secs. 911, 1099A, 2852 and 3114 of the House bill, and 

sec. 1089 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

From the Committee on Financial Services, for consideration of 

sec. 645 of the House bill, and sec. 1245 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

SPENCER BACHUS, 

SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, 

GARY L. ACKERMAN, 

From the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for consideration of 

secs. 1013, 1014, 1055, 1056, 1086, 1092, 1202, 1204, 1205, 

1211, 1214, 1216, 1218, 1219, 1226, 1228–1230, 1237, 1301, 

1303, 1532, 1533 and 3112 of the House bill, and secs. 159, 

1012, 1031, 1033, 1046, 1201, 1203, 1204, 1206–1209, 1221– 

1225, 1228, 1230, 1245, title XIII and sec. 1609 of the Senate 

amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, 

STEVE CHABOT, 

From the Committee on Homeland Security, for consideration 

of sec. 1099H of the House bill, and sec. 1092 of the Senate 

amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

BENNIE G. THOMPSON, 

From the Committee on the Judiciary, for consideration of secs. 

531 of subtitle D of title V, 573, 843 and 2804 of the House bill, 

and secs. 553 and 848 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

LAMAR SMITH, 

From the Committee on Natural Resources, for consideration of 

secs. 313, 601 and 1097 of the House bill, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

DOC HASTINGS, 

ROB BISHOP, 

EDWARD J. MARKEY, 

From the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 

for consideration of secs. 598, 662, 803, 813, 844, 847, 849, 

937–939, 1081, 1091, 1101–1111, 1116 and 2813 of the House 

bill, and secs. 827, 845, 1044, 1102–1107 and 2812 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

DENNIS A. ROSS, 

JAMES LANKFORD, 

ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
986 

From the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for 

consideration of secs. 911 and 1098 of the House bill, and secs. 

885, 911, 912 and Division E of the Senate amendment, and 

modifications committed to conference: 

RALPH M. HALL, 

BENJAMIN QUAYLE, 

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, 

From the Committee on Small Business, for consideration of 

sec. 804 of the House bill, and secs. 885–887 and Division E 

of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

RENEE L. ELLMERS, 

From the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for 

consideration of secs. 314, 366, 601, 1098 and 2814 of the 

House bill, and secs. 262, 313, 315, 1045, 1088 and 3301 of the 

Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

JOHN L. MICA, 

CHIP CRAVAACK, 

From the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for consideration of 

secs. 551, 573, 705, 731 and 1099C of the House bill, and secs. 

631 and 1093 of the Senate amendment, and modifications 

committed to conference: 

GUS M. BILIRAKIS, 

ANN MARIE BUERKLE, 

From the Committee on Ways and Means, for consideration of 

secs. 704, 1099 and 1225 of the House bill, and sec. 848 of 

the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: 

DAVE CAMP, 

WALLY HERGER, 

SANDER M. LEVIN, Managers on the Part of the House. 

CARL LEVIN, 

JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, 

JACK REED, 

DANIEL K. AKAKA, 

BEN NELSON, 

JIM WEBB, 

CLAIRE MCCASKILL, 

MARK UDALL

(Except for secs. 1021 and 

1022 in subtitle D), 

KAY R. HAGAN, 

MARK BEGICH, 

JOE MANCHIN III, 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, 

KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, JOHN MCCAIN, JAMES M. INHOFE, JEFF SESSIONS, SAXBY CHAMBLISS, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
987 

ROGER F. WICKER, SCOTT P. BROWN, ROB PORTMAN, KELLY AYOTTE, SUSAN M. COLLINS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, JOHN CORNYN, DAVID VITTER, Managers on the Part of the Senate. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REPORTS