alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-71-001; Docket No. PR11-72-001; Docket No. PR11-73-
001; Not Consolidated]


Southcross Gulf Coast Transmission Ltd.; Southcross Mississippi 
Pipeline, L.P.; Southcross CCNG Transmission Ltd.; Notice of Baseline 
Filings

    Take notice that on March 29, 2011, the applicants listed above 
submitted a revised baseline filing of their Statement of Operating 
Conditions for services provided under section 311 of the Natural Gas 
Policy Act of 1978 (``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91d7d4c3d2defffdf8fff4c2e4e1e1fee3e5d1f7f4e3f2bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

    Dated: April 1, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8300 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 442.72

 442.45

 442.60

 442.06

 441.66

 440.70

 440.10

 439.95

 439.22

 438.85

 438.53

 437.94

 437.90

 437.58

 437.10

 436.63

 436.15

 435.83

 435.49

 435.00

 434.50

 433.90

 433.47

 433.00

 432.68

 432.24

 431.71

 430.91

 430.50

 429.90

 429.34

 900,990

 898,382

 899,830

 894,619

 890,765

 881,538

 875,787

 874,352

 867,377

 863,849

 860,801

 855,192

 854,813

 851,776

 847,228

 842,783

 838,252

 835,235

 832,034

 827,429

 822,738

 817,121

 813,104

 808,721

 805,741

 801,650

 796,732

 789,328

 785,542

 780,013

 774,865

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6,566

 8,409

 4,966

 3,158

 3,025

 7,806

 6,258

 0

 6,601

 2,952

 2,380

 5,173

 0

 1,706

 0

 2,594

 2,606

 0

 0

 2,563

 2,572

 0

 2,615

 2,627

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL November 3, 2010

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2010 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -128,736 74,577 15,642 -86,149

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-2,611

-2,608

 1,448

-5,211

-3,854

-9,227

-5,751

-1,435

-6,975

-3,528

-3,048

-5,609

-379

-3,037

-4,548

-4,445

-4,531

-3,017

-3,201

-4,605

-4,691

-5,617

-4,017

-4,383

-2,980

-4,091

-4,918

-7,404

-3,786

-5,529

-5,148

 480

 533

 0

 1,085

 518

 487

 499

 438

 499

 483

 447

 460

 488

 489

 441

 500

 493

 505

 529

 527

 497

 415

 547

 561

 565

 539

 535

 526

 463

 509

 584

-7,438

-9,010

-5,451

-6,428

-6,146

-9,397

-7,300

-4,887

-9,075

-3,508

-2,950

-8,120

-1,439

-3,354

-512

-3,068

-3,115

-588

-553

-3,178

-3,209

-432

-2,999

6,809

-622

1,911

1,041

685

1,064

2,495

2,625

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 380,113

 371,103

 365,652

 359,224

 353,078

 343,681

 336,381

 331,494

 322,419

 318,911

 315,961

 307,841

 306,402

 303,048

 302,536

 299,468

 296,353

 295,765

 295,212

 292,034

 288,825

 288,393

 285,394

 292,203

 291,581

 293,492

 294,533

 295,218

 296,282

 298,777

 301,402

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 387,551

0

0

0

-2,500

-2,500

-1,000

-1,000

-4,000

-2,000

0

0

-2,500

-1,000

-1,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10,000

0

2,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

3,000

3,000

5,500
<PAGE>

                                   UNITED STATES
                         SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                               WASHINGTON D.C.  20549

                                     FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    OF 1934
              For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997

                                        OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934
              For the transition period from __________ to __________

                           Commission File No.:  1-9156

                         New Dimensions in Medicine, Inc.
                               filing in Behalf of
                 NEW DIMENSIONS IN MEDICINE, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


               DELAWARE                                   41-6410139
    (State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
    incorporation or organization)                     Identification No.)

        45 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET
              SUITE 3400
   MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (Address of                       55402
              principal                                   (Zip Code)
          executive offices)

         Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (612) 607-7000

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  NONE

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  NONE

<PAGE>

                                     SIGNATURES

           Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated:  March 27, 1998                  NEW DIMENSIONS IN MEDICINE, INC.
                                        LIQUIDATING TRUST

                                        By  /s/ James A. Potter
                                          -----------------------------------
                                            James A. Potter
                                            TRUSTEE

<PAGE>

                 NEW DIMENSIONS IN MEDICINE, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST
              ANNUAL REPORT TO BENEFICIARIES UNDER COVER OF FORM 10-K
                                   EXHIBIT INDEX


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT NO.                    DESCRIPTION                   METHOD OF FILING
-----------                    -----------                   ----------------
<S>           <C>                                         <C>
99.1            Report to Beneficiaries of the New
                Dimensions in Medicine, Inc. Liquidating
                Trust as of December 31, 1997.............   Filed herewith.

99.2            New Dimensions in Medicine, Inc.
                Liquidating Trust Financial Statements
                and Independent Auditor's Report,
                December 31, 1997 and 1996................   Filed herewith.

</TABLE>
§ 686.3 Duration of student eligibility. ( a ) An undergraduate or post-baccalaureate student enrolled in a TEACH Grant-eligible program may receive the equivalent of up to four Scheduled Awards during the period required for the completion of the first undergraduate baccalaureate program of study and first post-baccalaureate program of study combined.
( b ) A graduate student is eligible to receive the equivalent of up to two Scheduled Awards during the period required for the completion of a TEACH Grant-eligible master's degree program of study.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 20

- 00464

- CV Lydia DE LA FUENTE , Appellant

v. Johamberlin R. BEATO , Appellee
From the County Court a t Law No. 10 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CV01085 Honorable J

. Frank Davis , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 3, 2021
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant’s brief was due on January 8, 2021 . Appellant failed to file her brief or a motion for extension of time. On January 26 , 2021, we issued an order informing appellant that her brief was overdue and directing her to file, on or before February 12, 2021, her brief and a written response reasonably explaining why appellee was not significantly injured by appellant’s failure

to timely file a brief. We advised appellant that if she failed to file a brief and a written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal f or want of prosecution when an04

- 20

- 00464

- CV

- 2

- appellant fails to timely file a brief); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when an appellant fails to comply with a court order). Appellant has not filed
her brief or otherwise r esponded to our January 26, 2021 order. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/  Steven M. SkowSteven M. Skow, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Jeff L. SandersJeff L. Sanders, Senior VP & C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6750

In Re: SHAWN RANDALL NORBREY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-1803-AM)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 11, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Randall Norbrey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Randall Norbrey has filed a motion for a writ of prohibition seeking to have this court reverse his robbery conviction.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no

other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a

substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133,

1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries

the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to

attain the relief he desires” and that his entitlement to such

relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon,

Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980).

Because Norbrey has filed an appeal from the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and because the instant motion is tantamount to a second or successive § 2254 petition, for which he must

obtain authorization from this court to file, see 28 U.S.C.A. §

2244 (West Supp. 2000), Norbrey has failed to show that he is entitled to such extraordinary relief. Accordingly, although we grant

Norbrey leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the motion. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 784

 815

 831

 881

 949

 872

 901

 915

 836

 791

 908

 732

 847

 754

 723

 604

 682

 734

 861

 954

 971

 940

 957

 964

 875

 808

 784

 782

 789

 760

 562

 538

 521

 522

 554

 503

 549

 621

 588

 623

 643

 672

 693

 649

 586

 553

 593

 601

 643

 704

 711

 689

 702

 705

 667

 654

 675

 617

 610

 596

 664

 648

 645

 700

 691

 607

 659

 771

 717

 667

 797

 704

 757

 705

 650

 576

 638

 686

 756

 817

 822

 820

 804

 814

 764

 714

 723

 686

 683

 671

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 426

 416

 415

 449

 443

 391

 423

 492

 459

 428

 509

 451

 484

 452

 418

 372

 410

 440

 483

 521

 524

 523

 513

 519

 488

 457

 463

 440

 438

 431

TOTAL 21,356

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.81 [Reserved]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-1010 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Environment 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHINA 

Signed at Beijing October 10, 2010 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHINA 

Scientific Cooperation: Environment 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Beijing October 10, 2010; 

 Entered into force October 10, 2010. 

 With annexes. 

 






























16
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.68 Notice of permanent discontinuance. ( a ) *Notice.* When a permittee permanently discontinues business, a written notice shall be filed with the appropriate TTB officer to cover the discontinuance. The notice will be accompanied by the permit, and contain— ( 1 ) A request to cancel the permit,
( 2 ) A statement of the disposition made of all specially denatured spirits, as required in § 20.234, and
( 3 ) The date of discontinuance.
( b ) *Final Reports.* The written notice required by this paragraph will also be accompanied by a report on Form 5150.18 covering the discontinuance and marked “Final Report.”
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0061) [T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended at T.D. ATF-476, 67 FR 17939, Apr. 12, 2002; T.D. TTB-140 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
*IFRS 2, Share-based Payments (“IFRS 2”)*Under IFRS, when stock option awards vest gradually, each tranche is to be considered as a separateaward, while under Canadian GAAP, companies can make a policy choice to consider gradually vestedtranches as a single award. Similarly, the IFRS standard requires that forfeiture estimates beestablished at the time of the initial fair value assessment of share-based payments rather than toaccount for the forfeitures as they occur. Therefore, the compensation expense will have to berecognized over the expected term of each tranche and take into account the impact of thedifferences in accounting for forfeitures. The Company has performed its preliminary calculationand concluded that a reclassification adjustment between equity captions of approximately $200,000will be recorded at the transition date.*IAS 36, Impairment (“IAS 36”)*Under Canadian GAAP impairment standards for non-financial assets, a write-down to estimated fairvalue is recognized if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from an asset or group ofassets are less than their carrying value. IAS 36 requires a write-down to be recognized if therecoverable amount, determined as the higher of the estimated fair value less costs to sell orvalue in use is less than carrying value. The Company has performed impairment testing as ofDecember 1, 2008 and has concluded that there is no impairment charge under IFRS. No impairmentindicators were identified for the period between the transition date and November 30, 2009. IAS 36also permits the reversal of certain impairment charges where conditions have changed. The Companyreviewed past impairment charges and concluded that there was no justification for reversal of pastimpairment charges.*IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statement (“IAS 1”)*Financial statement presentation is addressed in conjunction with the related IFRS standards.Certain additional disclosures will be required in the notes to the financial statements and thestatement of operations will be modified to reflect a presentation by function. The Company iscurrently working on preliminary IFRS financial statements in accordance with IAS 1, Presentationof Financial Statements which will be completed in the last quarter of 2010.*Other Standards*Based on the results of the comparative analysis of the current IFRS with Canadian GAAP, theCompany has also completed its assessment of the following standards and determined that, otherthan enhanced disclosures, no material adjustments would result regarding:Property plant and equipment
§ 600.40 Loss of eligibility. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) (2) and (3) of this section, an institution, or a location or educational program of an institution, loses its eligibility on the date that— ( i ) The institution, location, or educational program fails to meet any of the eligibility requirements of this part;
( ii ) The institution or location permanently closes;
( iii ) The institution or location ceases to provide educational programs for a reason other than a normal vacation period or a natural disaster that directly affects the institution, particular location, or the students of the institution or location; or
( iv ) For purposes of the title IV, HEA programs— ( A ) The institution's period of participation as specified under 34 CFR 668.13 expires; or
( B ) The institution's provisional certification is revoked under 34 CFR 668.13.
( 2 ) If an institution loses its eligibility because it violated the requirements of § 600.5(a)(8), as evidenced by the determination under provisions contained in § 600.5(d), it loses its eligibility on the last day of the fiscal year used in § 600.5(d), except that if an institution's latest fiscal year was described in § 600.7(h)(1), it loses its eligibility as of June 30, 1994.
( 3 ) If an institution loses its eligibility under the provisions of § 600.7(a)(1), it loses its eligibility on the last day of the award year being evaluated under that provision.
( b ) If the Secretary undertakes to terminate the eligibility of an institution because it violated the provisions of § 600.5(a)(8) or § 600.7(a), and the institution requests a hearing, the presiding official must terminate the institution's eligibility if it violated those provisions, notwithstanding its status at the time of the hearing.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the Secretary designates an institution or any of its educational programs or locations as eligible on the basis of inaccurate information or documentation, the Secretary's designation is void from the date the Secretary made the designation, and the institution or program or location, as applicable, never qualified as eligible.
( 2 ) If an institution closes its main campus or stops providing any educational programs on its main campus, it loses its eligibility as an institution, and that loss of eligibility includes all its locations and all its programs. Its loss of eligibility is effective on the date it closes that campus or stops providing any educational program at that campus.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, if an institution ceases to satisfy any of the requirements for eligibility under this part— ( 1 ) It must notify the Secretary within 30 days of the date that it ceases to satisfy that requirement; and
( 2 ) It becomes ineligible to continue to participate in any HEA program as of the date it ceases to satisfy any of the requirements.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1088, 1099a-3, and 1141)
[59 FR 22336, Apr. 29, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 40622, July 29, 1998]
### §2533. State and private standards-related activities

#### (a) In general

It is the sense of the Congress that no State agency and no private person should engage in any standards-related activity that creates unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States.

#### (b) Presidential action

The President shall take such reasonable measures as may be available to promote the observance by State agencies and private persons, in carrying out standards-related activities, of requirements equivalent to those imposed on Federal agencies under section 2532 of this title, and of procedures that provide for notification, participation, and publication with respect to such activities.

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §403, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 243.)