alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 436.71

 436.97

 437.34

 437.78

 438.44

 438.68

 438.93

 439.07

 439.22

 439.46

 439.72

 439.85

 440.05

 440.60

 440.72

 440.59

 440.81

 440.97

 441.02

 440.89

 440.72

 440.55

 440.26

 440.15

 440.17

 440.01

 439.90

 439.81

 439.54

 439.05

 675.1

 677.6

 681.1

 685.2

 691.5

 693.7

 696.1

 697.5

 698.9

 701.2

 703.7

 704.9

 706.8

 712.1

 713.3

 712.0

 714.2

 715.7

 716.2

 714.9

 713.3

 711.7

 708.9

 707.8

 708.0

 706.5

 705.4

 704.5

 702.0

 697.3

STORAGE

+0.8

+2.4

+3.5

+4.2

+6.3

+2.3

+2.4

+1.3

+1.4

+2.3

+2.5

+1.2

+1.9

+5.3

+1.2

-1.3

+2.1

+1.5

+0.5

-1.3

-1.6

-1.6

-2.8

-1.1

+0.2

-1.5

-1.1

-0.9

-2.6

-4.7

CHANGE

4,465

4,694

5,558

5,774

6,957

5,170

5,105

4,744

4,579

5,097

5,035

4,689

5,975

7,533

6,088

4,649

6,115

5,289

4,978

4,124

3,946

3,765

3,558

3,772

4,315

4,110

4,315

4,744

4,488

3,700

INFLOW

 3,723

 3,199

 3,415

 3,419

 3,516

 3,703

 3,631

 3,794

 3,576

 3,673

 3,531

 3,822

 4,825

 2,942

 2,699

 2,656

 2,664

 2,616

 2,706

 2,719

 2,712

 2,714

 2,713

 2,712

 2,765

 4,121

 4,590

 4,906

 5,519

 5,509

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,693

 2,602

 2,448

 2,187

 1,751

 1,860

 1,858

 1,851

 1,612

 2,039

 1,374

 1,227

 547

 0

 0

 0

 288

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 204

 219

 232

 204

 215

 197

 216

 220

 219

 221

 221

 221

 177

 172

 175

 170

 154

 145

 149

 147

 164

 182

 177

 191

 207

 200

 199

 195

 215

 223

PUMPING

 112

 47

 151

 57

 70

 120

 60

 57

 60

 45

 29

 19

 6

 54

 29

 6

 42

 0

 19

 32

 45

 83

 38

 29

 19

 19

 57

 77

 57

 44

C.F.S.

 .36

 .15

 .48

 .18

 .22

 .38

 .19

 .18

 .19

 .14

 .09

 .06

 .02

 .17

 .09

 .02

 .13

 .00

 .06

 .10

 .14

 .26

 .12

 .09

 .06

 .06

 .18

 .24

 .18

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +22.8 147,331 105,090 23,337 0 5,831 1,483 4.68 1.01

ACRE-FEET +22,800 292,231 208,446 46,289 0 11,566 2,942

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 208,446

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 46,289

 11,566

TOTAL 266,301

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 1999 TO DATE = 27.74

 674.3

OUTLET 0 1.01

Table 11
§ 241.25 Deportation. ( a ) *Definitions of terms.* For the purposes of this section, the following terms mean: ( 1 ) *Adjacent island* —as defined in section 101(b)(5) of the Act.
( 2 ) *Foreign contiguous territory* —any country sharing a common boundary with the United States.
( 3 ) *Residence in foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island* —any physical presence, regardless of intent, in a foreign contiguous territory or an adjacent island if the government of such territory or island agrees to accept the alien.
( 4 ) *Aircraft or vessel* —any conveyance and other mode of travel by which arrival is effected.
( 5 ) *Next available flight* —the carrier's next regularly scheduled departure to the excluded alien's point of embarkation regardless of seat availability. If the carrier's next regularly scheduled departure to the excluded aliens point of embarkation is full, the carrier has the option of arranging for return transportation on other carriers which service the excluded aliens point of embarkation.
( b ) *Place to which deported.* Any alien (other than an alien crewmember or an alien who boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign contiguous territory or an adjacent island) who is ordered excluded shall be deported to the country where the alien boarded the vessel or aircraft on which the alien arrived in the United States. Otherwise, the Secretary may, as a matter of discretion, deport the alien to the country of which the alien is a subject, citizen, or national; the country where the alien was born; the country where the alien has a residence; or any other country.
( c ) *Contiguous territory and adjacent islands.* Any alien ordered excluded who boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign contiguous territory or in any adjacent island shall be deported to such foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, or national of such foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island, or if the alien has a residence in such foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island. Otherwise, the alien shall be deported, in the first instance, to the country in which is located the port at which the alien embarked for such foreign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
( d ) *Land border pedestrian arrivals.* Any alien ordered excluded who arrived at a land border on foot shall be deported in the same manner as if the alien had boarded a vessel or aircraft in foreign contiguous territory.
[62 FR 10378, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 70 FR 673, Jan. 5, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 385.15

 384.78

 384.43

 384.09

 383.68

 383.23

 382.80

 382.37

 381.93

 381.57

 381.17

 380.75

 380.51

 380.09

 379.68

 379.34

 378.94

 378.52

 378.27

 378.08

 377.81

 377.44

 377.19

 376.94

 376.57

 376.24

 376.07

 375.70

 375.26

 374.92

 288.8

 286.7

 284.8

 282.9

 280.7

 278.3

 275.9

 273.6

 271.3

 269.3

 267.2

 265.0

 263.8

 261.6

 259.4

 257.7

 255.6

 253.5

 252.2

 251.3

 249.9

 248.1

 246.8

 245.6

 243.7

 242.1

 241.3

 239.5

 237.3

 235.7

STORAGE

-2.7

-2.1

-1.9

-1.9

-2.2

-2.4

-2.3

-2.3

-2.4

-1.9

-2.1

-2.2

-1.3

-2.2

-2.1

-1.8

-2.1

-2.1

-1.3

-1.0

-1.4

-1.9

-1.3

-1.2

-1.8

-1.6

-0.8

-1.8

-2.1

-1.6

CHANGE

218

539

506

204

285

335

381

357

562

555

359

391

490

403

325

490

547

365

563

687

521

568

954

629

509

405

529

501

516

591

INFLOW

 1,181

 1,092

 895

 484

 845

 891

 893

 871

 1,096

 860

 770

 859

 479

 876

 771

 735

 938

 796

 582

 564

 622

 922

 1,002

 669

 886

 720

 844

 1,316

 1,488

 1,314

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 261

 328

 424

 493

 508

 508

 508

 507

 506

 506

 506

 505

 504

 504

 504

 502

 502

 502

 502

 501

 500

 500

 500

 500

 438

 402

 16

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 137

 137

 144

 148

 44

 155

 133

 130

 131

 134

 135

 129

 126

 114

 108

 125

 133

 131

 108

 97

 84

 80

 83

 89

 92

 89

 86

 88

 94

 95

PUMPING

 18

 16

 16

 24

 16

 16

 20

 14

 18

 17

 17

 12

 14

 17

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 0

 0

 0

 0

 13

 14

 6

 5

 11

 11

C.F.S.

 .10

 .09

 .09

 .13

 .09

 .09

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .10

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .09

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .55

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 11, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -55.8 14,285 26,261 0 12,437 3,379 367 2.13 .75

ACRE-FEET -55,800 28,334 52,089 0 24,669 6,702 728

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 52,089

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 6,702

TOTAL 83,460

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE = 1.87

 291.5

OUTLET 24,669 .75
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.162 Regulation of withdrawals. ( a ) Each permittee shall regulate its withdrawals of specially denatured spirits to ensure that ( 1 ) the quantity on hand and unaccounted for does not exceed the capacity of the storage facilities, and
( 2 ) the cumulative quantity withdrawn or received in any calendar year does not exceed the quantity authorized by the permit, Form 5150.9. Recovered alcohol will be taken into account in determining the total quantity of alcohol on hand.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, specially denatured spirits and recovered alcohol will be considered as unaccounted for if lost under circumstances where a claim for allowance is required by this part and the claim has not been allowed, or if used or disposed of in any manner not provided for in this part.
No. 21519.

#### Angelita A. Pacheco *v.*Joseph E. Pacheco.

(398 P.2d 978)

Decided February 8, 1965.

*357Robert Leland Johnson, pro se, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Angelita A. Pacheco, through her attorney Robert L. Johnson, filed her complaint in the trial court for separate maintenance against her husband, Joseph E. Pacheco. At the same time, she filed a motion for temporary support for herself and her children, and for temporary attorney’s fees. An application for restraining order was also heard, and the order issued. A date was set for the hearing on the temporary orders and notice of the hearing was served on the husband.

Shortly thereafter, the parties reconciled. On the date set for the hearing on the temporary orders, the wife’s attorney appeared and requested a hearing on the application for attorney’s fees. The trial court refused to hear the motion on the ground that the reconciliation precluded it from awarding any attorney’s fees, and that the attorney had no further standing in the instant action. The trial court was in error.

 We pointed out in *Stockham v. Stockham,*145 Colo. 376, 358 P.2d 1026, where attorney’s fees were awarded to the wife’s attorney over the husband’s objection after the parties had reconciled, that the reconciliation did not deprive the court of jurisdiction to award such fees. Under circumstances where the attorney’s client, in a domestic relations case, is no longer interested in whether the court enters orders requiring *358reasonable compensation to Mm, equity demands that he be treated as an intervenor. He does have standing to pursue his claim in the domestic relations case, and he is not required to resort to some other remedy. The rationale of this doctrine is clearly demonstrated in *Morrison v.*Peck, 151 Colo. 83, 376 P.2d 58, and *Tower v.*Tower, 147 Colo. 480, 364 P.2d 565.

The attorney in the instant case had a right to present his evidence as to what attorney’s fees, if any, should be awarded him under the well-established standards laid down by this Court with respect to attorney’s fees in domestic relations cases.

The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CorVu  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Justin M. MacIntosh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         Dated:  February 12, 2004


                                                /s/ Justin M. MacIntosh
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                       20
### §2803. Designation of major wine trading countries

(a) The Trade Representative shall designate as a major wine trading country each foreign country, or group of foreign countries represented as an economic union, that, in the judgment of the Trade Representative—

(1) is a potential significant market for United States wine; and

(2) maintains tariff barriers or nontariff barriers to (or other distortions of) trade in United States wine.

(b) In deciding, for purposes of subsection (a)(2), whether a foreign country or group of countries maintains nontariff barriers to (or other distortions of) trade in United States wine, the Trade Representative shall take into account—

(1) the review and report required under section 854(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2135 note);

(2) such relevant actions that may have been taken by that country or group since that review was conducted; and

(3) such information as may be submitted under section 2805 of this title by representatives of the wine and grape products industries in the United States, as well as other sources.

(Pub. L. 98–573, title IX, §904, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3048.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 854(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is section 854(a) of Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 294, which is set out as a note under section 2135 of this title.
§ 19.307 Distillates containing extraneous substances. ( a ) *Use in production.* Distillates that contain substantial quantities of fusel oil, aldehydes, or other extraneous substances may be removed from the distilling system before the production gauge and promptly added to fermenting or distilling material at the distillery where produced.
( b ) *Use at adjacent bonded wine cellar.* Distillates that contain aldehydes may be removed, without payment of tax, to an adjacent bonded wine cellar for use in fermentation of wine to be used as distilling material at the distilled spirits plant from which the distillates were removed. The removal of distillates to an adjacent bonded wine cellar must be done as provided in § 19.419. The receipt and use of those distillates must conform to the requirements of part 24 of this chapter.
(26 U.S.C. 5201, 5222, 5373)
Exhibit No. 32.1



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Service Attendants,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger E. Pawson,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


January 14, 2005                           By: /s/Roger E. Pawson
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Roger E. Pawson
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer



------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 24.19 Delegations of the Administrator.

Most of the regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.24, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 24, Wine. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16938, Apr. 4, 2006]
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.L. Brown  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form  [10-Q/10-QSB]  for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Carolyn Scott Brown,  Chief Financial  Officer (or the equivalent
thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




                                  /s/ Carolyn Scott Brown
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Carolyn Scott Brown
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                   (or the equivalent thereof)
                                  August 15, 2002
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) theRegistration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-56610) pertaining to shares of common stock of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38649) pertaining to the 1989 Incentive Stock OptionPlan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-72008) pertaining to the 1991 Executive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (d) theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-37035) pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc., (e) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-62889) pertaining to the IMPCO Investment and Tax Savings Plan, (f) theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-44085) pertaining to the 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (g) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-71544) pertaining to the 2000 IncentiveStock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (h) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-82110) pertaining to shares of common stock of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (i) theRegistration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-88690) pertaining to shares of common stock of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus (j) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-102069) pertaining to the IMPCO Technologies, Inc. 2002Stock Option Plan for Employees and the IMPCO Technologies, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors and the related Prospectus, and (k) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-102068) pertaining to shares of common stock of IMPCOTechnologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, of our report dated March 12, 2003, except for the 6th paragraph of Note 1 and the 2nd paragraph of Note 8(c) as to which the date is March 28, 2003 and the 1st paragraph ofNote 3 as to which the date is March 24, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. included in this Transition Report on Form 10-K for the eight months ended December 31,2002. 

 

/s/ ERNST &YOUNG LLP 

 

Long Beach, California 

April 9, 2003
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: Aisha Shuvonda Sauls XXX-XX-6600

 

Case No. 21-30372-KLP

DIRECTIVE FOR TERMINATION OF WAGE DEDUCTION

Travel Nurses Inc.

Attn: Payroll Department

9200 Arboretum Pkwy Ste 110

Richmond, VA 23226

IT IS DIRECTED:

That the above Employer be, and is hereby directed to discontinue withholding any additional 

funds from the wages of the Debtor, Aisha Shuvonda Sauls, and to remit directly to the debtor 

any funds held or to be held as of the date of this Directive under the previous Directive for 

Deduction.

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO A STANDING ORDER OF THE 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: May 18, 2021

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

IF ANY INFORMATION IS DESIRED REGARDING THIS DIRECTIVE, CALL THE 

TRUSTEE’S OFFICE AT 804.237.6800 OR FAX TO 804.237.6801

The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the Debtor and the 

employer and electronically sent to Debtor’s counsel on the date above written.

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Case 21-30372-KLP Doc 32 Filed 05/18/21 Entered 05/18/21 08:21:09 Desc

Page 1 of 1
§ 84.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the ED Deciding Official determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.110 Gasoline, unleaded.

Conforms to specifications as established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in the 1980 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 23, page 229, Standard No. D 439-79. Any of the “seasonal and geographical” volatility classes for unleaded gasoline are considered suitable as a denaturant. (For incorporation by reference, see § 21.6(b).)

[T.D. ATF-133, 48 FR 24673, June 2, 1983. Redesignated by T.D. ATF-442, 66 FR 12854, Mar. 1, 2001]