alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2493. Sugar quota

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President may not allocate any limitation imposed on the quantity of sugar to any country which has a Government involved in the trade of illicit narcotics or is failing to cooperate with the United States in narcotics enforcement activities as defined in section 2492(b) of this title as determined by the President.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title VIII, §803, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title IX, §9001, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–165.)
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 7
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 13 Filed 02/25/20 Entered 02/25/20 16:47:31 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 7
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-10-00296-CV

Style: Latrice Williams

v Dana Lee

Date motion filed*: March 19, 2013

Type of motion: Appellant’s Motion for Sanctions and to Compel 309th Court

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Appellant’s motion is DENIED. Any further arguments regarding the accuracy of the appellate 

record should be included in appellant’s brief.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: April 26, 2013
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 20.142 Records of bulk conveyances.

If completely denatured alcohol is to be shipped in a bulk conveyance, the shipment shall be accompanied by a record which identifies each car, truck, or compartment, the name and location (city or town and State) of both the consignor and consignee, the quantity in gallons, and the formula number of the completely denatured alcohol.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0062)

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR 59456, Aug. 30, 2016]
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RUSSELL JONATHAN CARROLL , Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 7:11

- cr - 00070

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Russell Jonathan Carroll, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Russell Jonathan Carroll appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) ( 2012) motion for a sentence reduction

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court

. See United States v. Carroll , No. 7:11

- cr - 00070

- D

- 1 ( E. D. N.C

. Jan. 25, 2018 ) ; see also Freeman v. United States , 564 U.S. 522, 526 (2011 ) (recognizing that f ederal courts

“ are forbidden, as a general matter, to modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed,” but recognizing that § 3582(c)(2) provides a narrow exception if a “ Guideli nes sentencing range has been lowered by retroactive amendment ” by the Sentencing Commission (internal quotation marks omitted) )

. We deny Carroll’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 662.8 Severability.

If any provision of this part or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the part or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice will not be affected thereby.

[88 FR 85507, Dec. 8, 2023]
**Fluorite Powder Supply Agreement in 2006**

Party A: **Ningxia Jinhe Chemical Co., Ltd**

Party B: **Inner Mongolia Xiangzhen Mining Group Co., Ltd**

The agreement, made out by and between the Seller and Buyer whereby both parties entered into the Fluorite Powder Supply Agreement in 2006 subject to terms and conditions set forth hereinafter as follows:

**Article 1**:  In 2006, Party B shall guarantee to supply Party A with 20,000 tons of good quality fluorite powders (higher than grade III).

**Article 2**:  The term of contract commences from April 20th2006 and ends on Dec. 31st 2006.

**Article 3**:  The price should be floated downward according to the market price in each month and this price is the tax-included price (13% value-added tax), no freight excluded. If the monthly price is unconfirmed, it should be determined and then sign an attachment by both parties. Based on the attachment, Party B shall issue to Party A the monthly tax-added invoice and transportation receipt.

**Article 4:  Destination**:

If the transportation is made by railway, the destination will be at the Special line 905 at Dawukou Station of Lanzhou Railway Bureau; if the transportation is done by truck, the destination will be in the factory of Ningxia Jinhe Chemical Co., Ltd, with the address: Industrial Garden of Dawukou District of Shizuishan City in Ningxia.

**Article 5**:  Party A shall pay 1,000,000 Yuan RMB to Party B as deposit in advance, and this deposit will offset the payment when Party A supplies the goods to Party B.

Party A: **Ningxia Jinhe Chemical Co., Ltd**

       Legal Representative: /s/ 

Party B: **Inner Mongolia Xiangzhen Mining Group Co., Ltd**

Legal Representative: /s/ 

Date:  April 3ird, 2006
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4930 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide for 

a lifetime National Recreational Pass for any veteran with a serviceconnected disability. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2019 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 

to provide for a lifetime National Recreational Pass for 

any veteran with a service-connected disability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wounded Veterans 

5 Recreation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4930 IH

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL RECREATIONAL PASSES FOR DISABLED 

2 VETERANS. 

3 Section 805(b) of the Federal Lands Recreation En4 hancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)) is amended by strik5 ing paragraph (2) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(2) DISABILITY DISCOUNT.—The Secretary 

7 shall make the National Parks and Federal Rec8 reational Lands Pass available, without charge and 

9 for the lifetime of the passholder, to the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) Any United States citizen or person 

11 domiciled in the United States who has been 

12 medically determined to be permanently dis13 abled for purposes of section 7(20)(A)(i) of the 

14 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

15 705(20)(A)(i)), if the citizen or person provides 

16 adequate proof of the disability and such citi17 zenship or residency. 

18 ‘‘(B) Any veteran who has been found to 

19 have a compensable or noncompensable service20 connected disability under title 38, United 

21 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Amendment Number One to 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive


 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 ALFA CORPORATION 
 2005 AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 WHEREAS, Alfa Corporation (the “Corporation”) maintains the Alfa Corporation 2005 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the
Corporation may amend or terminate the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Plan to provide for termination of the Plan
effective on the closing date of the proposed merger of the Corporation with a subsidiary of Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company; provided, however, that in the event that such merger is not consummated, the
provisions of this Amendment Number One will not become effective; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective on the closing
date of the merger of the Corporation with a subsidiary of Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company pursuant to the merger agreement dated November 4, 2007 (provided that such merger is consummated) as follows:

 1. By adding the following as Section 22: 
 22. Termination of the Plan. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Plan will terminate on the closing date
of the merger of the Corporation with a subsidiary of Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company pursuant to the merger agreement dated November 4, 2007 (provided that such merger is consummated). 
 2. All of the other terms of the Plan not herein amended shall remain in full force and effect. 
 This the 4th day of November, 2007. 
  

			
	ALFA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Jerry A. Newby
		
	Its:	 	President and Chief Executive
		 	Officer


  

			
	ATTEST:
		
	By:	 	/s/ Angela L. Cooner
		
	Its:	 	Vice President and Associate General
		 	Counsel
BWW#: VA-347687

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

IN RE:

JOSE RAUL LAZO

 Debtor

Case No.: 20-11039-KHK

Chapter: 13

__________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICES PURSUANT TO 

BANKRUPTCY RULE 2002

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002, Lauren S. Hunt and the law

offices of BWW Law Group, LLC hereby enter their appearance on behalf of Freedom Mortgage

Corporation ("Creditor"), in the above-captioned case and request that notices of all papers, including,

but not limited to, orders, reports, pleadings, motions, applications, or petitions, requests, disclosure

statements, answering and reply papers and notices of hearings or other proceedings, whether

transmitted by mail, delivery, telephone, telegraph, telex or otherwise relating to any issue which may

be raised in the above-captioned case be provided to:

Lauren S. Hunt

BWW Law Group, LLC

8100 Three Chopt Rd.

Suite 240

Richmond, VA 23229

(804) 282-0463 (phone)

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile)

bankruptcy@bww-law.com

Respectfully Submitted,

BWW Law Group, LLC

Dated: April 30, 2020 __________________________

Lauren S. Hunt, VSB# 92916

Attorney

BWW Law Group, LLC

8100 Three Chopt Rd.

Suite 240

Richmond, VA 23229

(804) 282-0463 (phone)

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile)

bankruptcy@bww-law.com

Attorney for Creditor

/s/ Lauren S. Hunt

Case 20-11039-KHK Doc 14 Filed 04/30/20 Entered 04/30/20 14:24:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 30th day of April, 2020, the following person(s) were or will be served a

copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF APPEARANCE via the CM/ECF system or by first class mail,

postage prepaid:

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee

300 N.Washington St Ste 400

Alexandria, VA 22314

Nathan A. Fisher, Attorney

3977 Chain Bridge Road, #2

Fairfax, VA 22030

Jose Raul Lazo

7450 Barbados Lane

Manassas, VA 20109

__________________________

Lauren S. Hunt, VSB# 92916

Attorney

BWW Law Group, LLC

8100 Three Chopt Rd.

Suite 240

Richmond, VA 23229

(804) 282-0463 (phone)

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile)

bankruptcy@bww-law.com

Attorney for Creditor

/s/ Lauren S. Hunt

Case 20-11039-KHK Doc 14 Filed 04/30/20 Entered 04/30/20 14:24:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 19.626 Records of distilled spirits shipped to manufacturers of nonbeverage products. ( a ) *General.* When a proprietor ships distilled spirits to a manufacturer of nonbeverage products, the proprietor must prepare a record of the shipment, forward the original to the consignee, and retain a copy.
( b ) *Form of record.* The record of shipment referred to in paragraph (a) of this section may consist of either the record of tax determination required by § 19.611 or any other document that contains the necessary information specified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Required information.* The record of shipment required under this section must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and registry number of the proprietor;
( 2 ) The date of shipment;
( 3 ) The name and address of the consignee;
( 4 ) The kind, proof, and quantity of distilled spirits in each container;
( 5 ) The number of shipping containers of each size;
( 6 ) The package identification numbers or serial numbers of the containers;
( 7 ) The serial number of the applicable record of tax determination; and
( 8 ) For distilled spirits containing eligible wine or eligible flavors, the effective tax rate.
(26 U.S.C. 5201, 5207)
#### Adele Heissenbuttel, Respondent, *v.*Mark C. Meagher, Appellant.

First Department,

May 29, 1914.

Motor vehicles—negligence — use of automobile by son of owner — when owner not liable.

A person owning an automobile used as a pleasure vehicle by himself and his family is not liable for personal injuries caused by the negligence of his son, an adult, who was driving the car for his individual purposes in company with friends who were not members of the family.

Appeal by the defendant, Mark 0. Meagher, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of May, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury for $7,500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of May, 1913, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*Stephen P. Anderton,*for the appellant.

*Abraham Gruber,*for the respondent.

Hotchkiss, J.:

The plaintiff, while standing in a, public street waiting for a surface car, was struck and injured by an automobile belonging to defendant and driven by his son, a young man twenty-four years of age. This son was pursuing his studies as a law student and lived with his father as a member of his family. The automobile was a pleasure vehicle kept by defendant for the use of himself and his family; his son was privileged to use it for his individual purposes whenever he so desired. It was customary also for the son to act as chauffeur of the car *753when it was used by defendant or other members of the family. On the occasion of the accident the son had taken the car out for a pleasure drive accompanied by several of his friends. Neither defendant nor any other member of his family, except his son, was in the party. It is evident from these facts that when the accident happened the car was neither expressly nor constructively in the use or service of the defendant, and that in driving the car the son was in no way acting as the defendant’s agent. Under these circumstances we' hold that defendant is not liable for his son’s negligent operation of the car. The principle involved has been applied in so many cases that the citation of but a few will suffice. *(Tanzer*v. Read, 160 App. Div. 584; *Freibaum*v. *Brady,*143 id. 220; *Cunningham*v. *Castle,*127 id. 580; *Maher*v. *Benedict,*123 id. 579.)

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the Complaint dismissed, with costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Order to be settled on notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,191.06

 1,191.08

 1,191.08

 1,191.08

 1,191.09

 1,191.09

 1,191.09

 1,191.10

 1,191.11

 1,191.11

 1,191.11

 1,191.10

 1,191.11

 1,191.11

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.12

 1,191.15

 1,191.16

 1,191.16

 1,191.17

 1,191.18

 1,191.18

 1,191.17

 1,191.17

 1,191.18

 1,191.18

 36.64

 36.67

 36.67

 36.67

 36.68

 36.68

 36.68

 36.70

 36.71

 36.71

 36.71

 36.70

 36.71

 36.71

 36.73

 36.73

 36.73

 36.73

 36.73

 36.73

 36.73

 36.77

 36.79

 36.79

 36.80

 36.82

 36.82

 36.80

 36.80

 36.82

 36.82

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.03

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.05

+0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

2

17

1

3

10

2

2

9

11

7

5

2

18

7

13

9

7

6

6

5

5

26

10

2

11

11

4

-5

4

15

5

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 1

 1

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 2

 6

 4

 9

 9

 6

 4

 8

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 3

 2

 3

 6

 4

C.F.S.

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .12

 .08

 .19

 .19

 .13

 .09

 .16

 .12

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .09

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .05

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .13

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .01

 .01

 .08

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/02/2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.22 230 31 0 105 2.26 .36

ACRE-FEET +220 456 61 0 208

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 61

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .36

JULY 1, 2008 2.04

 36.64
### §4404. Report on actions taken by United States Trade Representative

Not later than one year after the appointment of the first Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator pursuant to paragraph (2) of section 2171(b) of this title, as amended by subsection (a),1 and annually thereafter, the United States Trade Representative shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report describing in detail—

(1) enforcement actions taken by the Trade Representative during the one-year period preceding the submission of the report to ensure the protection of United States innovation and intellectual property interests; and

(2) other actions taken by the Trade Representative to advance United States innovation and intellectual property interests.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title VI, §609(c), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 190.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (a), referred to in text, means section 609(a) of Pub. L. 114–125, par. (1) of which amended section 2171(b)(2) of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 464.53

 465.07

 465.34

 465.14

 464.79

 464.98

 465.17

 465.62

 465.47

 465.04

 465.11

 464.74

 464.82

 465.12

 465.84

 467.25

 468.69

 469.65

 470.11

 470.74

 471.55

 472.33

 473.22

 474.22

 475.94

 476.95

 478.62

 480.21

 481.27

 482.40

 482.96

 1,119,815

 1,125,429

 1,128,239

 1,126,157

 1,122,517

 1,124,492

 1,126,469

 1,131,156

 1,129,593

 1,125,117

 1,125,845

 1,121,997

 1,122,829

 1,125,949

 1,133,450

 1,148,185

 1,163,297

 1,173,407

 1,178,261

 1,184,920

 1,193,498

 1,201,778

 1,211,248

 1,221,916

 1,240,334

 1,251,223

 1,269,262

 1,286,516

 1,298,061

 1,310,407

 1,316,540

 5,246

 7,577

 6,661

 4,923

 7,599

 7,243

 5,425

 5,032

 7,292

 4,400

 4,431

 4,403

 3,417

 5,965

 5,893

 7,416

 7,317

 7,238

 7,236

 6,039

 10,336

 7,158

 7,119

 7,223

 11,373

 7,105

 7,011

 11,048

 4,143

 7,004

 6,834

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 9, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2003 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 194,023 0 11,546 191,737

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-2,702

 5,614

 2,810

-2,082

-3,640

 1,975

 1,977

 4,687

-1,563

-4,476

 728

-3,848

 832

 3,120

 7,501

 14,735

 15,112

 10,110

 4,854

 6,659

 8,578

 8,280

 9,470

 10,668

 18,418

 10,889

 18,039

 17,254

 11,545

 12,346

 6,133

 376

 355

 368

 350

 346

 351

 350

 342

 336

 328

 316

 327

 329

 311

 324

 344

 327

 404

 463

 467

 459

 457

 440

 421

 411

 396

 401

 387

 397

 375

 288

4,714

7,069

6,275

4,551

7,253

6,880

5,117

4,397

6,856

4,226

4,052

4,315

3,410

5,143

5,343

6,645

6,582

6,605

6,809

5,352

9,702

6,485

6,459

6,813

10,942

6,252

6,247

10,414

3,918

6,147

6,764

ELEV STORAGE

 207,107

 513,754

 520,823

 527,098

 531,649

 538,902

 545,782

 550,899

 555,296

 562,152

 566,378

 570,430

 574,745

 578,155

 583,298

 588,641

 595,286

 601,868

 608,473

 615,282

 620,634

 630,336

 636,821

 643,280

 650,093

 661,035

 667,287

 673,534

 683,948

 687,866

 694,013

 700,777

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 509,040

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0