alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.3 Related regulations.

Regulations related to this part are listed below:

27 CFR Part 19—Distilled Spirits Plants.

27 CFR Part 26—Liquors and Articles from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

27 CFR Part 27—Importation of Distilled Spirits, Wines and Beer.

27 CFR Part 29—Stills and Miscellaneous Regulations.

27 CFR Part 30—Gauging Manual.

27 CFR Part 71—Rules of Practice in Permit Proceedings.

31 CFR Part 225—Acceptance of Bonds, Notes, or Other Obligations Issued or Guaranteed by the United States as Security in Lieu of Surety or Sureties on Penal Bonds.

[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9183, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-207, 50 FR 23682, June 5, 1985; T.D. ATF-459, 66 FR 38550, July 25, 2001; T.D. ATF-479, 67 FR 30798, May 8, 2002]
August 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER PUMPING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHAN

GE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET PLANT C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

851.4

1 454.06 847.6 -3.8 2,687 4,211 0 0 283 101 0.29 0.00

2 453.70 843.8 -3.8 2,452 3,992 0 0 259 100 0.29 0.00

3 453.27 839.4 -4.5 2,228 4,135 0 0 252 107 0.31 0.00

4 452.93 835.8 -3.5 2,629 4,072 0 0 253 93 0.27 0.00

5 452.53 831.6 -4.2 2,505 4,224 0 0 263 114 0.33 0.00

6 452.08 827.0 -4.7 2,106 4,056 0 0 271 137 0.40 0.00

7 451.72 823.2 -3.7 2,469 3,956 0 0 270 120 0.35 0.00

8 451.32 819.1 -4.1 2,461 4,166 0 0 266 113 0.33 0.00

9 451.03 816.1 -3.0 2,638 3,777 0 0 265 106 0.31 0.00

10 450.63 812.0 -4.1 2,670 4,359 0 0 274 109 0.32 0.00

11 450.20 807.6 -4.4 2,307 4,166 0 0 265 102 0.30 0.00

12 449.84 803.9 -3.7 2,444 3,925 0 0 273 105 0.31 0.00

13 449.44 799.8 -4.1 2,349 4,018 0 0 277 112 0.33 0.00

14 449.11 796.5 -3.4 2,446 3,753 0 0 276 115 0.34 0.00

15 448.75 792.8 -3.7 2,705 4,149 0 0 275 125 0.37 0.00

16 448.52 790.5 -2.3 3,253 4,039 0 0 272 118 0.35 0.00

17 448.10 786.2 -4.3 2,362 4,116 0 0 273 121 0.36 0.00

18 447.68 782.0 -4.2 2,183 3,977 0 0 266 77 0.23 0.00

19 447.29 778.0 -3.9 2,241 3,842 0 0 270 110 0.33 0.00

20 446.83 773.4 -4.6 2,016 4,019 0 0 261 67 0.20 0.00

21 446.36 768.7 -4.7 1,984 4,022 0 0 248 86 0.26 0.00

22 445.85 763.6 -5.1 1,828 4,062 0 0 249 86 0.26 0.00

23 445.57 760.8 -2.8 3,068 4,111 0 0 259 102 0.31 0.00

24 445.26 757.7 -3.1 2,904 4,070 0 0 263 125 0.38 0.00

25 444.89 754.1 -3.7 2,360 3,864 0 0 262 86 0.26 0.00

26 444.54 750.6 -3.5 2,487 3,871 0 0 265 95 0.29 0.00

27 444.16 746.9 -3.8 2,425 3,954 0 0 263 102 0.31 0.00

28 443.73 742.6 -4.2 2,177 3,940 0 0 263 108 0.33 0.00

29 443.30 738.4 -4.2 2,264 4,025 0 0 264 104 0.32 0.00

30 442.80 733.5 -4.9 2,035 4,142 0 0 261 101 0.31 0.00

31 442.29 728.5 -5.0 1,936 4,079 0 0 256 110 0.34 0.00

TOTALS -123.0 74,619 125,092 0 0 8,217 3,257 9.69 0.00

ACRE-FEET -

123,00

0

148,007 248,120 0 0 16,298 6,460

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 248,120 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Pumping Plant 16,298

Total = 264,418

Precipitation

This month = 0.00

October 01, 2022 To date = 30.81

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Folsom Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/10/2023
Case 20-12717-BFK Doc 77 Filed 03/09/21 Entered 03/10/21 09:26:07 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 20-12717-BFK Doc 77 Filed 03/09/21 Entered 03/10/21 09:26:07 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.2




Consent of JBPB & Co., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Board of Directors:


American Dairy, Inc


(now known as Feihe International, Inc.)




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-123932, effective April 7, 2005) of American Dairy, Inc (now known as Feihe International, Inc) of our report dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of American Dairy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and all related financial statements schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Feihe International, Inc.





/s/ JBPB & Co.





JBPB & Co. (formerly known as Grant Thornton)




April 8, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

917 

KA 14-01709 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARVIN DEJESUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

DONALD R. GERACE, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L.

Dwyer, J.), rendered March 3, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated and the matter is

remitted to Oneida County Court for further proceedings on the

indictment. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his

plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law 

§§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that County Court erred in

accepting his plea of guilty without further inquiry into whether

defendant was aware of and was waiving any affirmative defense that

the gun displayed by his codefendant was unloaded. We conclude that

defendant’s contention, which goes to whether the plea of guilty was

voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered, survives his

purported waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Bizardi, 130

AD3d 1492, 1492, lv denied 27 NY3d 992). Further, although defendant

failed to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of

conviction and thus failed to preserve his contention for our review

(see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665), we conclude that this case

falls within the rare exception to the preservation requirement (see

id. at 666; People v Dukes, 120 AD3d 1597, 1597-1598). The

codefendant’s allocution, which in this case was intertwined with that

of defendant, raised a potentially viable affirmative defense to the

charge, giving rise to a duty on the part of the court, before

accepting the guilty plea, to ensure that defendant was aware of that

defense and was knowingly and voluntarily waiving it (see People v

Powell, 278 AD2d 848, 848-849; see generally People v Mox, 20 NY3d

936, 938-939). Consequently, we conclude that the court erred in

accepting the plea without ensuring that defendant was making an

informed decision to waive the potential affirmative defense to the
-2- 917 

KA 14-01709 

charge. We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction, vacate the

plea, and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on

the indictment (see Dukes, 120 AD3d at 1597-1598).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 426.29

 426.21

 426.18

 426.10

 425.89

 425.58

 425.53

 425.43

 425.27

 425.04

 424.80

 424.61

 424.39

 424.04

 423.64

 423.36

 423.25

 423.06

 422.79

 422.57

 422.28

 421.93

 421.66

 421.28

 420.87

 420.58

 420.15

 419.79

 581.0

 580.3

 580.1

 579.4

 577.6

 574.9

 574.5

 573.6

 572.2

 570.2

 568.2

 566.6

 564.7

 561.7

 558.3

 555.9

 555.0

 553.4

 551.1

 549.3

 546.9

 543.9

 541.7

 538.5

 535.1

 532.8

 529.2

 526.3

STORAGE

-1.0

-0.7

-0.3

-0.7

-1.8

-2.7

-0.4

-0.9

-1.4

-2.0

-2.1

-1.6

-1.9

-3.0

-3.4

-2.4

-0.9

-1.6

-2.3

-1.8

-2.4

-2.9

-2.2

-3.2

-3.4

-2.4

-3.5

-2.9

CHANGE

2,276

2,598

2,778

2,611

2,152

2,172

2,629

2,307

2,224

2,113

2,550

2,262

1,979

1,663

1,480

1,663

1,707

1,587

1,441

1,761

1,568

1,288

1,604

1,492

1,420

1,468

1,428

1,380

INFLOW

 2,684

 2,868

 2,824

 2,872

 2,977

 3,418

 2,761

 2,674

 2,833

 2,985

 3,518

 3,010

 2,843

 3,080

 3,094

 2,769

 2,078

 2,280

 2,479

 2,595

 2,579

 2,404

 1,441

 3,001

 3,039

 2,607

 3,127

 2,785

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 123

 287

 1,214

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 56

 63

 69

 69

 70

 67

 53

 44

 62

 69

 66

 63

 62

 61

 62

 64

 70

 77

 77

 71

 66

 62

 60

 60

 62

 64

 63

 62

PUMPING

 17

 17

 17

 20

 20

 32

 32

 23

 23

 57

 0

 6

 20

 28

 31

 23

 28

 40

 28

 25

 25

 11

 20

 22

 31

 0

 22

 19

C.F.S.

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .08

 .20

 .00

 .02

 .07

 .10

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .14

 .10

 .09

 .09

 .04

 .07

 .08

 .11

 .00

 .08

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .65

 .00

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2018 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -55.8 53,601 77,625 1,624 0 1,794 637 2.25 .74

ACRE-FEET -55,800 106,318 153,969 3,221 0 3,558 1,263

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 582.0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 153,969

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 3,221

 3,558

TOTAL 160,748

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2017 TO DATE = 11.49

OUTLET 0 .74

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 11.49
§ 24.282 Multiple transfers. ( a ) *Truck.* The proprietor may use one transfer record for all wine shipped by truck on the same day to other premises. The proprietor shall prepare a shipment or delivery order for each shipment showing date of transfer, name and address of the proprietor and consignee, number of cases or containers, serial numbers of cases (if any) or container identification marks, and quantity shipped in gallons or liters. A copy of the shipping or delivery order will be retained by the proprietor and a copy sent with the shipment. On completion of lading the last truck for the day, the proprietor shall prepare and process a transfer record as provided in § 24.281.
( b ) *Pipeline.* The proprietor may use one transfer record for all wine (including distilling material and vinegar stock) transferred by pipeline to adjacent premises during a month. At the end of the month, the proprietor shall prepare and process a transfer record as provided in § 24.281.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1380, as amended (26 U.S.C 5362))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0298)
Exhibit 99B

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visual Frontier, Inc. (formerly Air
Test Technology, Inc.) on Form 10Q-SB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Moreal Chu,
President and General Manager (equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer) of Visual Frontier, Inc., following due inquiry,
certify (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that I believe that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Visual Frontier,
Inc.


                                    VISUAL FRONTIER, INC.


Date: May 29, 2003                   By: /s/ Moreal Chu
                                        ------------------------------------
                                     Name: Moreal Chu
                                     Title:  President and General Manager

                                       7
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 22, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President), 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Paul R. Boeding and Marilyn E. Boeding, both of Seneca, Kansas; 
to acquire control of Baileyville Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire control of Baileyville State Bank, both in Seneca, 
Kansas.
    2. Todd L. Sutherland, Lawrence, Kansas, individually and as 
trustee of the Todd L. Sutherland 2005 Revocable Trust; to acquire 
control of Lawrence Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of The University National Bank of Lawrence, both in 
Lawrence, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-8289 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 300.511 Impartial due process hearing. ( a ) *General.* Whenever a due process complaint is received under § 300.507 or § 300.532, the parents or the LEA involved in the dispute must have an opportunity for an impartial due process hearing, consistent with the procedures in §§ 300.507, 300.508, and 300.510.
( b ) *Agency responsible for conducting the due process hearing.* The hearing described in paragraph (a) of this section must be conducted by the SEA or the public agency directly responsible for the education of the child, as determined under State statute, State regulation, or a written policy of the SEA.
( c ) *Impartial hearing officer.* ( 1 ) At a minimum, a hearing officer— ( i ) Must not be— ( A ) An employee of the SEA or the LEA that is involved in the education or care of the child; or
( B ) A person having a personal or professional interest that conflicts with the person's objectivity in the hearing;
( ii ) Must possess knowledge of, and the ability to understand, the provisions of the Act, Federal and State regulations pertaining to the Act, and legal interpretations of the Act by Federal and State courts;
( iii ) Must possess the knowledge and ability to conduct hearings in accordance with appropriate, standard legal practice; and
( iv ) Must possess the knowledge and ability to render and write decisions in accordance with appropriate, standard legal practice.
( 2 ) A person who otherwise qualifies to conduct a hearing under paragraph (c)(1) of this section is not an employee of the agency solely because he or she is paid by the agency to serve as a hearing officer.
( 3 ) Each public agency must keep a list of the persons who serve as hearing officers. The list must include a statement of the qualifications of each of those persons.
( d ) *Subject matter of due process hearings.* The party requesting the due process hearing may not raise issues at the due process hearing that were not raised in the due process complaint filed under § 300.508(b), unless the other party agrees otherwise.
( e ) *Timeline for requesting a hearing.* A parent or agency must request an impartial hearing on their due process complaint within two years of the date the parent or agency knew or should have known about the alleged action that forms the basis of the due process complaint, or if the State has an explicit time limitation for requesting such a due process hearing under this part, in the time allowed by that State law.
( f ) *Exceptions to the timeline.* The timeline described in paragraph (e) of this section does not apply to a parent if the parent was prevented from filing a due process complaint due to— ( 1 ) Specific misrepresentations by the LEA that it had resolved the problem forming the basis of the due process complaint; or
( 2 ) The LEA's withholding of information from the parent that was required under this part to be provided to the parent.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(f)(1)(A), 1415(f)(3)(A)-(D))
#### § 19.649 Restrictions on alcohol content.

No person may remove from the vinegar plant premises vinegar or other fluid or any other material containing more than 2 percent alcohol by volume.

(26 U.S.C. 5504)
§ 19.729 Withdrawal of fuel alcohol. ( a ) For each shipment or other removal of fuel alcohol from the alcohol fuel plant premises, the consignor proprietor must prepare a commercial invoice, sales slip, or similar document that shows: ( 1 ) The date of the withdrawal;
( 2 ) The quantity of fuel alcohol removed;
( 3 ) A description of the shipment that includes the number and size of containers, tank trucks, etc.; and
( 4 ) The name and address of the consignee.
( b ) The consignor proprietor must retain in its records a copy of the document described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(26 U.S.C. 5181)
### §1822. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–618, title VI, §602(d), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2072

Section, Pub. L. 87–794, title II, §202, Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 872, made special provision for low-rate articles.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 344

 325

 327

 344

 340

 341

 354

 337

 340

 339

 312

 319

 300

 283

 279

 276

 277

 279

 275

 273

 273

 265

 267

 262

 273

 268

 268

 274

 266

 264

 308

 304

 306

 315

 325

 315

 328

 322

 308

 298

 288

 279

 272

 267

 266

 265

 264

 263

 259

 256

 252

 251

 251

 245

 242

 252

 252

 256

 253

 244

 321

 314

 317

 329

 335

 335

 335

 330

 322

 308

 297

 293

 283

 275

 272

 270

 270

 271

 268

 264

 260

 257

 258

 254

 256

 259

 263

 263

 261

 256

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
#### Eliza Goldstein v. Sarah E. Galinger and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Alan M. Schnaid, the Principal Accounting Officer of Westin Realty
Corp., the General Partner of Westin Hotels Limited Partnership (WHLP),
certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the
Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of WHLP.

| |  |                                                                                                                                                    |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Alan M. Schnaid

Alan M. Schnaid
Principal Accounting Officer of
Westin Realty Corp., the General Partner
of Westin Hotels Limited Partnership |  | 
| |  |                                                                                                                                                    |  | 
| |  | March 19, 2003                                                                                                                                     |  |
### §4014. Testing for human immunodeficiency virus

(a) The Attorney General shall cause each individual convicted of a Federal offense who is sentenced to incarceration for a period of 6 months or more to be tested for the presence of the human immunodeficiency virus, as appropriate, after the commencement of that incarceration, if such individual is determined to be at risk for infection with such virus in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Bureau of Prisons relating to infectious disease management.

(b) If the Attorney General has a well-founded reason to believe that a person sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a Federal offense, or ordered detained before trial under section 3142(e), may have intentionally or unintentionally transmitted the human immunodeficiency virus to any officer or employee of the United States, or to any person lawfully present in a correctional facility who is not incarcerated there, the Attorney General shall—

(1) cause the person who may have transmitted the virus to be tested promptly for the presence of such virus and communicate the test results to the person tested; and

(2) consistent with the guidelines issued by the Bureau of Prisons relating to infectious disease management, inform any person (in, as appropriate, confidential consultation with the person's physician) who may have been exposed to such virus, of the potential risk involved and, if warranted by the circumstances, that prophylactic or other treatment should be considered.

(c) If the results of a test under subsection (a) or (b) indicate the presence of the human immunodeficiency virus, the Attorney General shall provide appropriate access for counselling, health care, and support services to the affected officer, employee, or other person, and to the person tested.

(d) The results of a test under this section are inadmissible against the person tested in any Federal or State civil or criminal case or proceeding.

(e) Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Attorney General shall issue rules to implement this section. Such rules shall require that the results of any test are communicated only to the person tested, and, if the results of the test indicate the presence of the virus, to correctional facility personnel consistent with guidelines issued by the Bureau of Prisons. Such rules shall also provide for procedures designed to protect the privacy of a person requesting that the test be performed and the privacy of the person tested.

(Added Pub. L. 105–370, §2(a), Nov. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 3374.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (e), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 105–370, which was approved Nov. 12, 1998.