Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices 18567 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

National Institutes of Health 

Fogarty International Center; Notice of 

Meeting 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is 

hereby given of a meeting of the Fogarty 

International Center Advisory Board. 

The meeting will be open to the 

public as indicated below, with 

attendance limited to space available. 

Individuals who plan to attend and 

need special assistance, such as sign 

language interpretation or other 

reasonable accommodations, should 

notify the Contact Person listed below 

in advance of the meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) 

and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as 

amended. The grant applications and 

the Discussions could disclose 

confidential trade secrets or commercial 

property such as patentable materials, 

and personal information concerning 

individuals associated with the grant 

applications, the disclosure of which 

would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of personal privacy. 

Name of Committee: Fogarty International 

Center Advisory Board. 

Date: May 25–26, 2011. 

Closed: May 25, 2011, 2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 

Agenda: To review and evaluate grant 

applications and/or proposals. 

Place: National Institutes of Health, 

Building 31, 31 Center Drive, C Wing, Room 

B2C07, Bethesda, MD 20892. 

Open: May 26, 2011, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. 

Agenda: Discussion topics to include 

communications, policy research and publicprivate partnerships. 

Place: National Institutes of Health, 

Lawton Chiles International House, Bethesda, 

MD 20892. 

Contact Person: Robert Eiss, Public Health 

Advisor, Fogarty International Center, 

National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, 

Room B2c02, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 

496–1415, EISSR@MAIL.NIH.GOV. 

Any interested person may file written 

comments with the committee by forwarding 

the statement to the Contact Person listed on 

this notice. The statement should include the 

name, address, telephone number and when 

applicable, the business or professional 

affiliation of the interested person. 

In the interest of security, NIH has 

instituted stringent procedures for entrance 

onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 

including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles 

will be inspected before being allowed on 

campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 

form of identification (for example, a 

government-issued photo ID, driver’s license, 

or passport) and to state the purpose of their 

visit. 

Information is also available on the 

Institute’s/Center’s home page: http:// 

www.nih.gov/fic/about/advisory.html, where 

an agenda and any additional information for 

the meeting will be posted when available. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Nos. 93.14, Intramural Research 

Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research 

Loan Repayment Program for Individuals 

from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 93.232, 

Loan Repayment Program for Research 

Generally; 93.39, Academic Research 

Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 

Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan 

Repayment Program; 93.187, Undergraduate 

Scholarship Program for Individuals from 

Disadvantaged Backgrounds, National 

Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 29, 2011. 

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory 

Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7918 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

Periodically, the Substance Abuse and 

Mental Health Services Administration 

(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of 

information collection requests under 

OMB review, in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

documents, call the SAMHSA Reports 

Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. 

Project: Strategic Prevention 

Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF 

SIG) Program (OMB No. 0930–0279) 

—Revision 

SAMHSA’s Center for Substance 

Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is responsible 

for the evaluation instruments of the 

Strategic Prevention Framework State 

Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) Program. The 

program is a major initiative designed 

to: (1) Prevent the onset and reduce the 

progression of substance abuse, 

including childhood and underage 

drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse 

related problems; and (3) build 

prevention capacity and infrastructure 

at the State-, territorial-, Tribal- and 

community-levels. 

Five steps comprise the SPF: 

Step 1: Profile population needs, 

resources, and readiness to address the 

problems and gaps in service delivery. 

Step 2: Mobilize and/or build capacity 

to address needs. 

Step 3: Develop a comprehensive 

strategic plan. 

Step 4: Implement evidence-based 

prevention programs, policies, and 

practices and infrastructure 

development activities. 

Step 5: Monitor process, evaluate 

effectiveness, sustain effective 

programs/activities, and improve or 

replace those that fail. 

An evaluation team is currently 

implementing a multi-method, quasiexperimental evaluation of the first two 

Strategic Prevention Framework State 

Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) cohorts 

receiving grants in FY 2004 and FY 

2005. A second evaluation is being 

conducted with the SPF SIG Cohorts III, 

IV and V. This notice invites comments 

for revision to the protocol for the 

ongoing cross-site evaluations of the 

Strategic Prevention Framework State 

Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) (OMB No. 

0930–0279) which expires on 11/30/12. 

This revision includes three parts: 

(1) Continuation of the use of the 

previously approved two-part 

Community Level Instrument (CLI Parts 

I and II) for Cohorts I and II and the use 

of an instrument to assess the 

sustainability of grantee implementation 

and infrastructure accomplishments 

which is a modification of an 

instrument used in an earlier phase of 

the evaluation. 

(2) The addition of one more Cohort 

(Cohort V) which will use the 

previously approved SPF SIG cross-site 

evaluation instruments. All three 

instruments are modified versions of 

data collection protocols used by 

Cohorts I and II and have received OMB 

approval (OMB No. 0930–0279). The 

three instruments are: 

a. A Grantee-Level SPF 

Implementation Instrument, 

b. A Grantee-Level Infrastructure 

Instrument, and 

c. A two-part Community-Level SPF 

Implementation Instrument. 

(3) Recalculation of burden numbers 

for Cohort IV to replace estimates that 

had been based on 20 grantees to reflect 

the 25 grantees actually funded. 

An additional Cohort III, IV, and V 

evaluation component (i.e., participantlevel NOMs outcomes) is also included 

in this submission as part of the 

comprehensive evaluation, however, no 

associated burden from this evaluation 

activity is being imposed and therefore 

clearance to conduct the activities is not 

being requested. Specifically, Cohort III, 

IV, and V SPF SIG grantees have been 

included in the currently OMB 

approved umbrella NOMs application 

(OMB No. 0930–0230) covering the 

collection of participant-level NOMs 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
18568 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices 

outcomes by all SAMHSA/CSAP 

grantees. 

Every attempt has been made to make 

the evaluation for Cohorts III, IV, and V 

comparable to Cohorts I and II. 

However, initial resource constraints for 

the Cohorts III, IV, and V evaluation 

have necessitated some streamlining of 

the original evaluation design. Since the 

ultimate goal is to fund all eligible 

jurisdictions, there are no control 

groups at the grantee level for Cohorts 

III, IV, and V. The primary evaluation 

objective is to determine the impact of 

SPF SIG on the reduction of substance 

abuse related problems, on building 

State prevention capacity and 

infrastructure, and preventing the onset 

and reducing the progression of 

substance abuse, as measured by the 

SAMHSA National Outcomes Measures 

(NOMs). Data collected at the grantee, 

community, and participant levels will 

provide information about process and 

system outcomes at the grantee and 

community levels as well as context for 

analyzing participant-level NOMs 

outcomes. 

Grantee-Level Data Collection 

Cohort I and II Continuation 

The Sustainability Interview will be 

conducted during Phase II of the 

evaluation in 2011 (Cohort I) and 2012 

(Cohort II). The interview guide is 

adapted from the Phase I instruments 

(OMB No. 0930–0279) and focuses on 

State-level prevention capacity and 

infrastructure in relation to the five 

steps of the SPF process: needs 

assessment, capacity building, strategic 

planning, implementation of evidencebased programs, policies, and practices 

(EBPPPs), and evaluation/monitoring. 

The interviews will be aimed at 

understanding the status of the 

prevention infrastructure at the time of 

the interview, whether the status has 

changed since the previous rounds of 

interviews (conducted in 2007 and 

2009), and whether the SPF SIG had any 

influence on changes that might have 

occurred. 

Cohort III, IV, and V Revision 

Two Grantee-level Instruments (GLI) 

were developed to gather information 

about the infrastructure of the grantee’s 

overall prevention system and collect 

data regarding the grantee’s efforts and 

progress in implementing the Strategic 

Prevention Framework 5-step process. 

Both instruments are modified versions 

of the grantee-level interview protocols 

used in the SPF SIG Cohort I and II 

Cross-Site Evaluation and have received 

OMB clearance for use with Cohorts III 

and IV (OMB No. 0930–0279). The total 

burden imposed by the original 

interview protocols has been reduced by 

restructuring the format of the original 

protocol, deleting several questions and 

replacing the majority of open-ended 

questions with multiple-choiceresponse questions. The Infrastructure 

Instrument will capture data to assess 

infrastructure change and to test the 

relationship of this change to outcomes. 

The Strategic Prevention Framework 

Implementation Instrument will be used 

to assess the relationship between SPF 

implementation and change in the 

NOMs. Information for both surveys 

will be gathered by the grantees’ 

evaluators twice over the life of the SPF 

SIG award. 

Based on the current 16 grantees 

funded in Cohort III, and 25 funded in 

Cohort IV, and 10 funded in Cohort V, 

the estimated annual burden for granteelevel data collection is displayed below 

in Table 1. The burden estimates for the 

GLIs are based on the experience in the 

Cohort I and II SPF SIG evaluation as 

reported in the original OMB 

submission (OMB No. 0930–0279), less 

the considerable reduction in length of 

these instruments implemented by the 

Cohort III, IV, and V evaluation team. 

Community-Level Data Collection 

(Continuation and Revision) 

Cohort I and II Continuation 

The Community-level Instrument 

(CLI) is a two part, Web-based survey for 

capturing information about SPF SIG 

implementation at the community level 

(originally submitted as an addendum to 

OMB No. 0930–0279). Part I of this 

instrument was developed to assess the 

progress of communities as they 

implement the Strategic Prevention 

Framework (SPF), and Part II was 

developed to gather descriptive 

information about the specific 

interventions being implemented at the 

community level and the populations 

being served including the gender, age, 

race, ethnicity, and number of 

individuals in target populations. Each 

SPF SIG funded community will 

complete a separate Part II form for each 

intervention they implement. 

The CLI (Parts I and II) was designed 

to be administered two times a year 

(every six months) over the course of the 

SPF SIG Cohort I and II initiative. Four 

rounds of data were collected under the 

current OMB approval period and the 

Cohorts I and II cross-site evaluation 

team plans to collect additional rounds 

once this request for a revision is 

approved. Data from this instrument 

will allow CSAP to assess the progress 

of the communities in their 

implementation of both the SPF and 

prevention-related interventions funded 

under the initiative. The data may also 

be used to assess obstacles to the 

implementation of the SPF and 

prevention-related interventions and 

facilitate mid-course corrections for 

communities experiencing 

implementation difficulties. 

The estimated annual burden for 

community-level data collection is 

displayed below in Table 1. Note that 

the total burden reflects the 443 

communities that have received SPF 

funds from their respective Cohort I and 

Cohort 2 States. Burden estimates are 

based on pilot respondents’ feedback as 

well as the experience of the survey 

developers reported in the original OMB 

submission (OMB No. 0930–0279). 

Additionally, an individual 

community’s burden may be lower than 

the burden displayed in Table 1 because 

all sections of the Community-level 

Instrument (parts I and II) may not 

apply for each reporting period as 

community partners work through the 

SPF steps and only report on the steprelated activities addressed. Note also 

that some questions will be addressed 

only once and the responses will be 

used to pre-fill subsequent surveys. 

Cohort III, IV, and V (Revision) 

The Community-Level Instrument to 

be completed by Cohort III, IV, and V 

funded subrecipient communities is a 

modified version of the one in use in the 

SPF SIG Cohorts I and II Cross-Site 

Evaluation and use of these modified 

instruments has been approved by OMB 

for Cohorts III and IV (OMB No. 0930– 

0279). The total burden imposed by the 

original instrument was reduced by 

reorganizing the format of the original 

instrument, optimizing the use of skip 

patterns, and replacing the majority of 

open-ended questions with multiplechoice-response questions. 

Part I of the instrument will gather 

information on the communities’ 

progress implementing the five SPF SIG 

steps and efforts taken to ensure cultural 

competency throughout the SPF SIG 

process. Subrecipient communities 

receiving SPF SIG awards will be 

required to complete Part I of the 

instrument annually. Part 2 will capture 

data on the specific prevention 

intervention(s) implemented at the 

community level. A single prevention 

intervention may be comprised of a 

single strategy or a set of multiple 

strategies. A Part II instrument will be 

completed for each prevention 

intervention strategy implemented 

during the specified reporting period. 

Specific questions will be tailored to 

match the type of prevention 

intervention strategy implemented (e.g., 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices 18569 

Prevention Education, Communitybased Processes, and Environmental). 

Information collected on each strategy 

will include date of implementation, 

numbers of groups and participants 

served, frequency of activities, and 

gender, age, race, and ethnicity of 

population served/affected. 

Subrecipient communities’ partners 

receiving SPF SIG awards will be 

required to update Part II of the 

instrument a minimum of every six 

months. 

The estimated annual burden for 

specific segments of the communitylevel data collection is displayed in 

Table 1. The burden estimates for the 

CLIs are based on the experience in the 

Cohort I and II SPF SIG evaluation as 

reported in the original OMB 

submission (OMB No. 0930–0279), less 

the considerable reduction in length of 

these instruments implemented by the 

Cohort III, IV, and V evaluation team. 

The total burden assumes an average of 

15 community-level subrecipients per 

grantee (n=51 Grantees) for a total of 765 

community respondents, annual 

completion of the CLI Part I, a minimum 

of two instrument updates per year for 

the CLI Part II, and an average of three 

distinct prevention intervention 

strategies implemented by each 

community during a 6-month period. 

Additionally, some questions will be 

addressed only once and the responses 

will be used to pre-fill subsequent 

updates. 

Participant-Level Data Collection 

(Cohort III, IV, and V—Continuation) 

Participant-level change will be 

measured using the CSAP NOMs Adult 

and Youth Programs Survey Forms 

already approved by OMB (OMB No. 

0930–0230). Subrecipient communities 

will have the opportunity to select 

relevant measures from the CSAP NOMs 

Adult and Youth Programs Survey 

Forms based on site-specific targeted 

program outcomes and may voluntarily 

select additional outcome measures that 

are relevant to their own initiatives. 

Cohort III, IV, and V SPF SIG grantees 

have been included in the currently 

OMB approved umbrella NOMs 

application (OMB No. 0930–0230) 

covering all SAMHSA/CSAP grantees, 

therefore no additional burden for this 

evaluation activity is being imposed and 

clearance to conduct the activities is not 

being requested. 

Total Estimates of Annualized Hour 

Burden 

Estimates of total and annualized 

reporting burden for respondents by 

evaluation cohort are displayed below 

in Table 1. Overall summaries appear in 

Table 2. The estimated average annual 

burden of 5,773 hours is based on the 

completion of the Community LevelInstrument (CLI Parts I and II) and 

Sustainability Interview for Cohorts I 

and II, and the Grantee-level 

Instruments (GLI) and the CommunityLevel Instrument (CLI) for Cohorts III, 

IV, and V. 

TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS

Instrument type Respondent 

Burden 

per response 

(hrs.) 

No. of respondents 

No. of responses 

per respondent 

Total burden (hrs.) 

Hourly 

wage 

cost 

Total 

hour cost 

Cohorts 1 and 2 Grantee-Level Burden 

CLI Grantee Level Input ................................................. Grantee ... 1 26 2 52 .0 $42.00 $2,184 

Sustainability Interview ................................................... Grantee .... 1 .5 26 1 39 .0 42.00 1,638 

Total Burden ............................................................ Grantee .... 2 .5 26 3 91 .0 42.00 3,822 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Grantee ... ............ 26 ................ 22 .8 42.00 956 

Cohorts 1 and 2 Community-Level Burden 

CLI Part I ........................................................................ Community 2 .17 443 2 1,922 .6 32.00 61,523 

CLI Part II ....................................................................... Community 2 .17 443 8 7,690 .5 32.00 246,095 

Review of Past Responses ............................................ Community 2 .5 443 2 2,215 .0 32.00 70,880 

Total Burden ............................................................ Community 6 .84 443 12 11,828 .1 32.00 378,498 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Community ............ 443 ................ 2,957 .0 32.00 94,625 

Grantee-Level Burden Cohort 3 

GLI Infrastructure Instrument .......................................... Grantee .... 2 .50 16 1 40 .0 42.00 1,680 

GLI Implementation Instrument ...................................... Grantee .... 2 .25 16 1 36 .0 42.00 1,512 

CLI Part I, 1—20: Community Contact Information— 

Updates.

Grantee .... 0 .25 16 1 4 .0 42.00 168 

Total Burden ............................................................ Grantee .... ............ ................ ................ 80 .0 42.00 3,360 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Grantee ... ............ ................ ................ 20 .0 42.00 840 

Community-Level Burden Cohort 3 

CLI Part I, 21–172: Community SPF Activities—Updates.Community 0 .75 240 1 180 32.00 5,760 

CLI Part II—Updates ...................................................... Community 0 .5 240 6 720 32.00 23,040 

Total burden ............................................................ Community ............ ................ ................ 900 32.00 28,800 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Community ............ ................ ................ 225 32.00 7,200 

Grantee-Level Burden Cohort 4 

GLI Infrastructure Instruments ........................................ Grantee .... 2 .50 25 1 62 .5 42.00 2,625 

GLI Implementation Instruments .................................... Grantee .... 2 .25 25 2 112 .5 42.00 4,725 

CLI Part I, 1–20: Community Contact Information— 

Initialization.

Grantee .... 1 .5 25 1 37 .5 42.00 1,575 

CLI Part I, 1–20: Community Contact Information—Updates.Grantee .... 0 .25 25 3 18 .75 42.00 787 

Total Burden ............................................................ Grantee .... ............ ................ ................ 231 .25 42.00 9,712 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Grantee ... ............ ................ ................ 57 .8 42.00 2,428 

Community-Level Burden Cohort 4 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
18570 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices 

TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS—Continued 

Instrument type Respondent 

Burden 

per response 

(hrs.) 

No. of respondents 

No. of responses 

per respondent 

Total burden (hrs.) 

Hourly 

wage 

cost 

Total 

hour cost 

CLI Part I, 21–172: Community SPF Activities— 

Initialization.

Community 3 375 1 1,125 32.00 36,000 

CLI Part II—Initialization ................................................. Community 0 .75 375 6 1,687 .5 32.00 54,000 

CLI Part I, 21–172: Community SPF Activities—Updates.Community 0 .75 375 3 843 .75 32.00 27,000 

CLI Part II—Updates ...................................................... Community 0 .5 375 18 3,375 32.00 108,000 

Total burden ............................................................ Community ............ ................ ................ 7031 .25 32.00 225,000 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Community ............ ................ ................ 1,757 .8 32.00 56,250 

Grantee-Level Burden Cohort 5 

GLI Infrastructure Instruments ........................................ Grantee .... 2 .5 10 2 50 42.00 2,100 

GLI Implementation Instruments .................................... Grantee .... 2 .25 10 2 45 42.00 1,890 

CLI Part I, 1–20: Community Contact Information— 

Initialization.

Grantee .... 1 .5 10 1 15 .0 42.00 630 

CLI Part I, 1–20: Community Contact Information—Updates.Grantee .... 0 .25 10 3 7 .5 42.00 315 

Total Burden ............................................................ Grantee .... ............ ................ ................ 117 .5 42.00 4,935 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Grantee ... ............ ................ ................ 29 .4 42.00 1,234 

Community-Level Burden Cohort 5 

CLI Part I, 21–172: Community SPF Activities— 

Initialization.

Community 3 150 1 450 32.00 14,400 

CLI Part II—Initialization ................................................. Community 0 .75 150 6 675 32.00 21,600 

CLI Part I, 21–172: Community SPF Activities—Updates.Community 0 .75 150 3 337 .5 32.00 10,800 

CLI Part II—Updates ...................................................... Community 0 .5 150 18 1,350 32.00 43,200 

Total burden ............................................................ Community ............ ................ ................ 2,812 .5 32.00 90,000 

Average Annual Burden Over 4 Reporting Periods ....... Community ............ ................ ................ 703 .12 32.00 22,500 

TABLE 2—ANNUALIZED SUMMARY TABLE

Respondent 

Burden 

per response 

(hrs.) 

No. of respondents 

No. of responses 

Total 

burden 

(hrs.) 

Hourly 

wage 

cost 

Total hour 

cost 

Total Burden All Cohorts 

Average Annual Burden ................................................... Grantee ... 1.44 77 90 .25 129 .9 $42.00 $5,455 

Community 1.04 1208 5,424 5,643 32.00 180,576 

Overall ..... 1.05 1285 5,514 .25 5,773 ................ 186,031 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by May 4, 2011 to: SAMHSA 

Desk Officer, Human Resources and 

Housing Branch, Office of Management 

and Budget, New Executive Office 

Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 

20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s 

receipt and processing of mail sent 

through the U.S. Postal Service, 

respondents are encouraged to submit 

comments by fax to: 202–395–7285. 

Dated: March 25, 2011. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Management, Technology 

and Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7875 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5487–N–08] 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection for Public Comment; HOPE 

VI Public Housing Programs: Funding 

and Program Data Collection 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Public and Indian 

Housing, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

will be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal. 

DATES: Comments Due Date: June 3, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name/or OMB Control 

number and should be sent to: Colette 

Pollard., Departmental Reports 

Management Officer, QDAM, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street, SW., 

Room 4160, Washington, DC 20410– 

5000; telephone 202–402–3400 (this is 

not a toll-free number) or e-mail Ms. 

Pollard at Colette_Pollard@hud.gov. 

Persons with hearing or speech 

impairments may access this number 

through TTY by calling the toll-free 

Federal Information Relay Service at 

(800) 877–8339. (Other than the HUD 

USER information line and TTY 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES