alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131248 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131248 COA: 268738 Wayne CC: 04-004415-01 LUCAS ANTHONY WALTERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
### SUBTITLE IV—COUNTERVAILING AND ANTIDUMPING DUTIES
Editorial Note on Part 21
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001. Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

§ 21.47 Formula No. 23-A. ( a ) *Formula.* To every 100 gallons of alcohol add: Eight gallons of acetone, U.S.P.
( b ) *Authorized uses.* ( 1 ) As a solvent: 011. Cellulose coatings. 012. Synthetic resin coatings. 013. Shellac coatings. 014. Other natural resin coatings. 015. Candy glazes. 016. Other coatings. 032. Transparent sheeting. 034. Cellulose intermediates and industrial collodions. 035. Soldering flux. 036. Adhesives and binders. 042. Solvents and thinners (other than proprietary solvents or special industrial solvents). 052. Inks (including meat branding inks). 053. Stains (wood, etc.). 111. Hair and scalp preparations. 112. Bay rum. 113. Lotions and creams (hand, face, and body). 114. Body deodorants and deodorant creams. 141. Shampoos. 142. Soaps and bath preparations. 210. External pharmaceuticals, not U.S.P. or N.F. 244. Antiseptic solutions, U.S.P. or N.F. 249. Miscellaneous external pharmaceuticals, U.S.P. or N.F. 331. Processing pectin. 332. Processing other food products. 341. Processing crude drugs. 342. Processing glandular products, vitamins, hormones, and yeasts. 343. Processing antibiotics and vaccines. 344. Processing medicinal chemicals (including alkaloids). 345. Processing blood and blood products. 349. Miscellaneous drug processing (including manufacture of pills). 358. Processing other chemicals. 359. Processing miscellaneous products. 410. Disinfectants, insecticides, fungicides, and other biocides. 420. Embalming fluids and related products. 430. Sterilizing and preserving solutions. 440. Industrial detergents and soaps. 450. Cleaning solutions (including household detergents). 482. Miscellaneous dye solutions. 485. Miscellaneous solutions.
( 2 ) As a fluid: 740. Refrigerating uses. 750. Miscellaneous fluid uses.
( 3 ) Miscellaneous uses:
812. Product development and pilot plant uses (own use only).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Corestream Energy, Inc. (f/k/a Zealous, Inc.); 
Order of Suspension of Trading

March 31, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Corestream Energy, Inc. (``Corestream'') (f/k/a Zealous, Inc.) because 
it has failed to file certain periodic reports with the Commission and 
because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of statements 
made by Corestream in press releases concerning, among other things, 
the acquisition of certain oil wells. Corestream is quoted on OTC Link 
(previously the Pink Sheets) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under 
the ticker symbol ``ZLUS.''
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 
March 31, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 13, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8038 Filed 3-31-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 16.32 Preemption.

No statement relating to alcoholic beverages and health, other than the statement required by § 16.21, shall be required under State law to be placed on any container of an alcoholic beverage, or on any box, carton, or other package, irrespective of the material from which made, that contains such a container.
#### § 11.22 Consignment sales.

Consignment sales are arrangements wherein the trade buyer is under no obligation to pay for distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages until they are sold by the trade buyer.
### §2231. Change of name

#### (a) Former United States Tariff Commission

The United States Tariff Commission (established by section 1330 of this title) is renamed as the United States International Trade Commission.

#### (b) References in law and other documents

Any reference in any law of the United States, or in any order, rule, regulation, or other document, to the United States Tariff Commission (or the Tariff Commission) shall be considered to refer to the United States International Trade Commission.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §171, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2009.)
§ 644.3 Who is eligible to participate in a project? ( a ) An individual is eligible to participate in an Educational Opportunity Centers project if the individual meets all of the following requirements: ( 1 ) ( i ) Is a citizen or national of the United States;
( ii ) Is a permanent resident of the United States;
( iii ) Is in the United States for other than a temporary purpose and provides evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization Service of his or her intent to become a permanent resident;
( iv ) Is a permanent resident of Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Palau); or
( v ) Is a resident of the Freely Associated States—the Federated States of Micronesia or the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
( 2 ) ( i ) Is at least 19 years of age; or
( ii ) Is less than 19 years of age, and the individual cannot be appropriately served by a Talent Search project under 34 CFR part 643, and the individual's participation would not dilute the Educational Opportunity Centers project's services to individuals described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
( 3 ) Expresses a desire to enroll, or is enrolled, in a program of postsecondary education, and requests information or assistance in applying for admission to, or financial aid for, such a program.
( b ) A veteran as defined in § 644.7(b), regardless of age, is eligible to participate in an Educational Opportunity Centers project if he or she satisfies the eligibility requirements in paragraph (a) of this section other than the age requirement in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-16)
!



	

 




  !"#$%

&"#


'()

#*+,)
-."/

+
0-12)3/

4-20#.1115

671" 

7 

	



838(#."9.++
:-#;1

1"#7.++)	






838(#."9.++
:-#;1

1"#7.++)	

&"#

12


41(+2

1"."-".17<
"

< .10"1)

 !"#$#-"

!121"




"
"
	


'!1,1.2#".1=" 6".1
*.10+.=#9-"9".,
"5=.+2&5)


-12.10)1,)>." #0#2"" !#!#"5,991+5*1>1/*>2+72)

Case 20-11219-BFK Doc 14 Filed 06/25/20 Entered 06/25/20 10:19:38 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
 .,0);88/?@" !#!#"5A%12-!1,1.2#".1=15!!.".1=.+2".2

6".1).".)&5" '1."2
""1*#-!",5-#"=#" "#1."#.,"=	.#0.1.)



  "" -"9".,"5&)12." #&5.)"#9.1"2"++>


-12.10)1,"=#,+-!1" =#91".12!#!#"512&".1

!.1" #=B12

  "
-12.10)1, ++!515-#!+-!#,2#..10=#9" +

=" !#!#"5> ., >-+2" #>.&!.2"" &"#"" 

 !"#$#-"

+C12#.)	.#0.1.

%BUFE@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

4-20'1."2
""1*#-!",5-#"

"#1."#.,"=	.#0.1.






EE.1 +0-

.1 +0-):FG3/?8

,*7.++.*)
"/

 " 2)6#5+12G/  1

?%38G3

2" +0-H.+7#91+0+,9

	



Jun 25 2020 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: June 25, 2020

Case 20-11219-BFK Doc 14 Filed 06/25/20 Entered 06/25/20 10:19:38 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
;,+-+%#".=.,".1

 =#0.10#2#>12#2&512E##72-!1++1,#5!#".

!-#-1"";,+-+%

EE.1 +0-):

,,

	



838(#."9.++
:-#;1

1"#7.++)	






838(#."9.++
:-#;1

1"#7.++)	

1.+6#

 -10I#)

8$G< ."".#7
"

6,;1)	


41(+2

1"."-".17<
"

< .10"1)

 !"#$#-"

.1 +0-):

,*7.++.*)
-."/

" 2)6G/

 #

Case 20-11219-BFK Doc 14 Filed 06/25/20 Entered 06/25/20 10:19:38 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-820 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR PROPERTY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CHINA 

Signed at Washington August 20, 2009 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CHINA 

Diplomatic and Consular Property 

 Agreement signed at Washington August 20, 2009; 

 Entered into force August 20, 2009. 

 With annex.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 22
- 00379
- CV

__________________
IN RE 1ST CHOICE ACCIDENT & INJURY, LLC

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20
- 09
- 11398
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In a petition for a writ of mandamus , Relator , 1st Choice Accident & Injury,
LLC , a non - p arty manag ement services organization for a non

- party medical provider , seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial court to vacate an order denying a protectiv e order in a suit resulting from a motor vehicle a cc ident

. Relator argues information and documents relating to the business and payment relationship between Relator and a chiropractor who treated the P laintiff , Angel Fermin Sanchez, are irrelevant to the issues in the lawsuit and the Real Party in Interest, Satyanarayana
Vanama , has either obtained the information from the plaintiff or could obtain the2 information from the chiropractor

. After reviewing Relator ’ s mandamus peti tion and the documents it provided with the petition, we conclude that Relator failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on December 7, 2022 Opinion Delivered December 8, 2022 Before Golemon , C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-1936

_____________________________

MURRAY HILTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

September 14, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Murray Hilton, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### §670e. Applicability to other laws; national forest lands

Nothing herein contained shall be construed to modify, amend or repeal any provision of Public Law 85–337, nor as applying to national forest lands administered pursuant to the provisions of section 9 of the Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 655), nor section 315m of title 43.

(Pub. L. 86–797, title I, §105, formerly §5, Sept. 15, 1960, 74 Stat. 1053; renumbered title I, §105, Pub. L. 93–452, §3(1), Oct. 18, 1974, 88 Stat. 1375; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title III, §312(b)(5), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1353.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 85–337, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 85–337, Feb. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 28, which is classified to section 2671 of Title 10, Armed Forces; section 472 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works [now 40 U.S.C. 102]; and sections 155 to 158 of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Section 9 of the Act of June 7, 1924 [ch. 348, 43 Stat. 655], referred to in text, was classified to the code as follows: The first and fifth sentences were classified to section 471(b) of this title, which was repealed by section 704(a) of Pub. L. 94–579; the second and third sentences were classified to section 505 of this title; and the fourth sentence was classified to section 499 of this title.

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–81 inserted section catchline.
### §1711. Citation of chapter

This Act may be cited as the "Anti-Smuggling Act".

(Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title IV, §403, 49 Stat. 529.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act Aug. 5, 1935, which enacted this chapter and sections 1432a and 1601a of this title and amended sections 70, 483, 1401, 1434, 1436, 1441, 1581, 1584, 1585, 1586, 1587, 1591, 1592, 1615, 1619, 1621 of this title, sections 60, 106, and 288 of former Title 46, Shipping, and sections 91, 277, 319, 325 of former Title 46, Appendix. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995,
BOTH INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FORM 10-K OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          79,091
<SECURITIES>                                    36,066
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,426
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,163
<PP&E>                                         222,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 579,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,573
<BONDS>                                          3,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           421
<OTHER-SE>                                     421,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   579,734
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               532,628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  339,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,238<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Merger costs associated with poolings-of-interests
<F2>Includes merger costs totaling $0.05 per share. Also reflects September 1997
two-for-one stock split.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### JAHNIG, Respondent, v. JAHNIG, et al, Appellants.

(251 N. W. 818.)

(File No. 7428.

Opinion filed December 19, 1933.)

For former opinion, see 61 S. D. 205, 247 N. W. 606.

*Kirby, Kirby, >& Kirby*and *Loids N. Crill,*all of Sioux Falls, for Appellants.

*Van Slyke & Agor,*of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

PFR CURIAM.

In the above cause appeal was attempted from an order of the Industrial Commissioner, sitting in lieu of a *90'board of arbitration. This court (Jahnig v. Jahnig, 61 S. D. 205, 247 N. W. 606, 607) remanded the case to the circuit court, with directions to dismiss the appeal, saying:

> “No claim for review was filed with the industrial commissioner, pursuant to section 9474, Rev. Code 1919, but an appeal to the circuit court was attempted directly from the order of July 22. The circuit court entered judgment affirming the order and award of the industrial commissioner.

> “On the authority of Murray v. Stokke, 60 S. D. 224, 244 N. W. 265, we must hold that the circuit court acquired no jurisdiction by the attempted appeal, and that the order of July 22, 1931, became final and enforceable in ten days, pursuant to section 9471, Rev. Code 1919. The point, being jurisdictional, must g'overn when it comes to our attention, regardless of the fact that it was not urged by the parties.”

Appellant now moves for rehearing and makes application to amend the record to show that, as a matter of fact, a petition for review, as contemplated by section 9474, Rev. Code 1919, was filed with the Industrial Commissioner prior to the taking of the appeal from the commissioner’s original order when, sitting in lieu of a ■board of arbitration. It appears that no action was taken by the Industrial Commissioner on the petition for review and no order entered by him on said petition, or on review. The mere filing of a petition for review without action thereon could not make the commissioner’s original order sitting in lieu of a board of arbitration appealable.

The disposition of the matter in our former opinion is therefore correct, that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the attempted appeal, and the petition for rehearing will therefore be denied. We withdraw, however, the statement in our former opinion that no claim for review was filed and the statement that the original order of the commissioner became final and enforceable in ten days. What the status of the matter will be between the parties or before the commissioner when the mandate of this court has been complied with is not now before us, and we express no opinion thereon.

All the Judges concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas Scannell, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2005 |  |  |  |                                                     
|                  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ THOMAS SCANNELL                                 
|                  |  |  |  | Name: Thomas Scannell Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 
                                       1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
                                   § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gottschalks Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended February
3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Famalette, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by §  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/  James R. Famalette              
|James R. Famalette                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  April 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gottschalks Inc. and will be retained by
Gottschalks Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,126

 2,732

 2,594

 2,971

 2,600

 2,342

 1,460

 787

 460

 340

 293

 284

 238

 207

 328

 334

 409

 321

 325

 317

 260

 192

 166

 143

 137

 143

 138

 143

 148

 153

 153

 332

 322

 325

 326

 344

 303

 272

 260

 242

 224

 204

 174

 178

 184

 188

 181

 156

 133

 130

 134

 126

 113

 117

 120

 130

 132

 133

 132

 140

 134

 139

 544

 634

 630

 788

 750

 675

 543

 390

 288

 265

 236

 217

 199

 192

 205

 215

 214

 172

 193

 220

 187

 139

 135

 129

 134

 138

 135

 138

 143

 146

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 24,032

 22,250

 19,869

 17,382

 14,835

 13,150

 11,083

 10,021

 9,107

 8,397

 7,440

 6,980

 6,634

 6,351

 6,012

 5,593

 5,177

 4,561

 4,004

 3,549

 3,193

 2,942

 2,789

 2,653

 2,551

 2,472

 2,408

 2,354

 2,292

 2,223

 2,156

 1,717

 1,589

 1,419

 1,242

 1,060

 939

 792

 716

 651

 600

 531

 499

 474

 454

 429

 400

 370

 326

 286

 254

 228

 210

 199

 190

 182

 177

 172

 168

 164

 159

 154

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER