alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3



CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan M. Collyns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



March 14, 2007



By:

/s/    SUSAN M.
COLLYNSSusan M. Collyns Chief Financial Officer










---

|* |  | This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §4434. Lost and stolen passports

The Secretary may not enter into an agreement with the government of a foreign country to establish or maintain U.S. Customs and Border Protection preclearance operations at an airport in such country unless the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that such government—

(1) routinely submits information about lost and stolen passports of its citizens and nationals to INTERPOL's Stolen and Lost Travel Document database; or

(2) makes such information available to the United States Government through another comparable means of reporting.

(Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §816, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 220.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,194

 8,917

 10,152

 9,171

 7,577

 4,999

 3,123

 2,002

 1,211

 1,456

 2,414

 998

 433

 492

 301

 240

 397

 489

 433

 358

 304

 347

 294

 265

 246

 223

 198

 232

 218

 245

 256

 1,225

 1,721

 1,577

 1,023

 1,101

 605

 295

 354

 311

 318

 289

 275

 263

 256

 153

 148

 153

 200

 216

 192

 199

 195

 190

 180

 183

 185

 184

 193

 203

 216

 227

 4,360

 4,840

 5,907

 4,813

 3,463

 1,854

 888

 734

 573

 557

 949

 424

 338

 305

 221

 172

 233

 284

 275

 269

 248

 252

 228

 209

 200

 192

 192

 203

 212

 223

 240

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 58,480

 60,541

 62,820

 63,394

 62,336

 59,141

 55,886

 52,605

 49,457

 46,236

 43,050

 38,964

 34,359

 30,005

 25,866

 21,198

 15,524

 10,995

 7,807

 6,222

 5,582

 5,100

 4,755

 4,407

 3,658

 3,426

 3,280

 3,178

 3,169

 3,220

 3,227

 4,177

 4,324

 4,487

 4,528

 4,453

 4,224

 3,992

 3,758

 3,533

 3,303

 3,075

 2,783

 2,454

 2,143

 1,848

 1,514

 1,109

 785

 558

 444

 399

 364

 340

 315

 261

 245

 234

 227

 226

 230

 231

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                 SUBSIDIARIES OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                 ---------------------------------------------


The subsidiaries of Inland Steel Industries, Inc. (other than certain
subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, do not
constitute a significant subsidiary), each of which is incorporated in the State
of Delaware (except as noted below) and each of which is wholly owned (except as
noted below), either by Inland Steel Industries, Inc. or by one of its wholly
owned subsidiaries, are as follows:

     Inland Steel Company

          Inland Steel Mining Company

          Inland Steel Administrative Service Company (formerly known
          as Inland Steel Finance Company)

     Ryerson Tull, Inc. (majority owned by Inland Steel Industries, Inc.)
     (formerly known as Inland Materials Distribution Group, Inc.)

          Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.

          J. M. Tull Metals Company, Inc.
          (a Georgia corporation)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 442.50

 442.25

 441.87

 441.47

 441.18

 440.95

 440.69

 440.33

 439.95

 439.61

 439.24

 438.90

 438.67

 438.28

 437.85

 437.48

 436.97

 436.66

 436.38

 436.00

 435.68

 435.35

 435.03

 434.72

 434.45

 434.07

 433.80

 433.43

 433.03

 432.79

 730.6

 728.1

 724.4

 720.6

 717.7

 715.5

 713.0

 709.5

 705.9

 702.6

 699.1

 695.8

 693.7

 689.9

 685.9

 682.4

 677.6

 674.7

 672.0

 668.5

 665.5

 662.4

 659.4

 656.6

 654.1

 650.6

 648.1

 644.7

 641.0

 638.8

STORAGE

-3.0

-2.4

-3.7

-3.9

-2.8

-2.2

-2.5

-3.5

-3.7

-3.3

-3.5

-3.2

-2.2

-3.7

-4.1

-3.5

-4.8

-2.9

-2.6

-3.6

-3.0

-3.1

-3.0

-2.9

-2.5

-3.5

-2.5

-3.4

-3.7

-2.2

CHANGE

2,094

2,142

1,815

1,543

1,832

1,897

1,756

1,487

1,108

1,261

1,228

1,265

1,840

1,171

969

1,181

571

986

1,664

1,246

1,547

1,495

1,574

1,566

1,567

1,397

1,578

1,213

1,109

1,873

INFLOW

 3,229

 2,989

 3,294

 3,125

 2,890

 2,673

 2,648

 2,852

 2,590

 2,562

 2,669

 2,557

 2,574

 2,688

 2,689

 2,613

 2,659

 2,105

 2,644

 2,708

 2,709

 2,712

 2,718

 2,661

 2,482

 2,817

 2,487

 2,611

 2,647

 2,668

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 306

 305

 303

 299

 302

 299

 297

 300

 293

 292

 296

 301

 303

 267

 272

 273

 272

 290

 278

 269

 262

 273

 264

 288

 282

 276

 275

 267

 266

 259

PUMPING

 84

 78

 84

 74

 58

 48

 74

 83

 70

 48

 48

 44

 66

 85

 63

 56

 66

 56

 65

 65

 77

 59

 93

 62

 61

 74

 67

 46

 46

 49

C.F.S.

 .26

 .24

 .26

 .23

 .18

 .15

 .23

 .26

 .22

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .21

 .27

 .20

 .18

 .21

 .18

 .21

 .21

 .25

 .19

 .30

 .20

 .20

 .24

 .22

 .15

 .15

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 20, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -94.9 43,975 81,270 0 0 8,529 1,949 6.20 .00

ACRE-FEET -94,900 87,224 161,199 0 0 16,917 3,866

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 161,199

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 16,917

TOTAL 178,116

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2006 TO DATE = .00

 733.6

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.26

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.30

 1,198.37

 1,198.33

 1,198.30

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.25

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.21

 1,198.20

 1,198.18

 1,198.17

 1,198.15

 1,198.14

 48.36

 48.36

 48.36

 48.34

 48.32

 48.32

 48.36

 48.39

 48.37

 48.36

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.43

 48.55

 48.48

 48.43

 48.39

 48.37

 48.34

 48.34

 48.32

 48.32

 48.30

 48.27

 48.25

 48.21

 48.20

 48.16

 48.14

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.04

+0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.05

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.12

+0.12

-0.07

-0.05

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

CHANGE

42

52

55

40

37

42

71

73

36

38

5

39

35

38

132

168

41

37

41

47

34

52

41

48

37

22

26

8

16

9

18

INFLOW

 33

 33

 33

 29

 24

 24

 33

 43

 38

 33

 20

 20

 20

 20

 54

 100

 72

 54

 43

 38

 29

 29

 24

 24

 20

 12

 8

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

OUTLET

 13

 14

 17

 15

 17

 13

 15

 7

 2

 9

 7

 14

 10

 13

 10

 0

 0

 5

 11

 13

 18

 18

 21

 19

 21

 23

 22

 21

 20

 22

 22

C.F.S.

 .23

 .24

 .29

 .27

 .30

 .22

 .26

 .13

 .04

 .15

 .12

 .25

 .18

 .22

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .20

 .22

 .31

 .31

 .37

 .34

 .36

 .40

 .38

 .36

 .35

 .39

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.15

 .89

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2000 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/15/2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.27 1,380 155 910 432 7.53 2.62

ACRE-FEET -270 2,737 307 1,805 857

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,805

OUTLET

TOTAL

 307

 2,112

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.62

JULY 1, 1999 21.45

 48.37
(No. 7045

#### Continental Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

Continental Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §1450. Unlading on Sundays, holidays, or during overtime hours

No merchandise, baggage, or passengers arriving in the United States from any foreign port or place, and no bonded merchandise or baggage being transported from one port to another, shall be unladen from the carrying aircraft, vessel or vehicle on Sunday, a holiday, or during overtime hours, except under special license granted by the appropriate customs officer under such regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §450, 46 Stat. 715; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287; Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13811(b)(2), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in R.S. §2872, as amended by the act of June 26, 1884, ch. 121, §25, 23 Stat. 59, which was superseded by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §450, 42 Stat. 954, and was repealed by section 642 thereof. Section 450 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 450 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

R.S. §2871 providing for the granting of a special license to unlade at night, and the amendment thereof by act June 30, 1906, ch. 3909, 34 Stat. 633, were repealed by section 6 of act Feb. 13, 1911, ch. 46, and provision for the grant of a special license to lade or unlade at night, and the grant of permits for immediate lading and unlading of vessels admitted to preliminary entry, etc., was made, in sections 1 and 4 of that act, which were repealed by section 643 of the act of Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356.

A special provision on the subject matter of this section for the northern, northeastern and northwestern frontiers was contained in R.S. §3120, as amended by act Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 248, prior to repeal by section 642 of the act of Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–66 in section catchline substituted "during overtime hours" for "at night", and in text substituted "during overtime hours" for "at night" and inserted "aircraft," before "vessel".

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to appropriate customs officer for reference to collector.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–66 applicable to customs inspectional services provided on or after Jan. 1, 1994, see section 13811(c) of Pub. L. 103–66, set out as a note under section 267 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

September 2002

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6206 4256 10462 12310 8442 20752

2-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 1 5951 4306 10257 11804 8540 20344

3-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4947 4245 9192 9813 8419 18232

4-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4083 4237 8320 8098 8405 16503

5-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3809 4274 8084 7556 8478 16034

6-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4142 3789 7931 8216 7515 15731

7-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3615 4363 7978 7171 8654 15825

8-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3902 4371 8273 7739 8670 16409

9-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5020 4004 9024 9957 7942 17899

10-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4913 3985 8898 9744 7905 17649

11-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5475 4300 9775 10859 8529 19388

12-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 1 5705 4300 10005 11315 8529 19844

13-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5090 4333 9424 10097 8595 18692

14-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5310 4297 9608 10533 8524 19057

15-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6242 4320 10562 12381 8569 20950

16-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4808 4296 9104 9536 8521 18057

17-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 4722 3911 8633 9366 7757 17123

18-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 4 4891 3987 8878 9701 7909 17610

19-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 4 3881 4388 8269 7698 8703 16401

20-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4234 4399 8634 8399 8726 17125

21-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3011 4353 7364 5972 8635 14607

22-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2903 4371 7274 5758 8669 14427

23-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2985 4343 7328 5920 8615 14535

24-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2825 4376 7201 5604 8679 14283

25-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2798 4473 7271 5550 8873 14423

26-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2633 4371 7004 5223 8670 13893

27-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2726 4352 7078 5407 8633 14040

28-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2716 4445 7161 5388 8816 14204

29-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1945 4369 6314 3857 8666 12523

30-Sep-02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2452 4315 6767 4863 8559 13422

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 53 12 65 XXXX 123940 128131 252071 245835 254147 499982

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,996

EX PARTE SHANE ALAN FLORES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 09CR3504 IN THE 212 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his due process rights were violated because a forensic scientist did

not follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence and therefore the results of his analyses are

unreliable. A Department of Public Safety report shows that the lab technician who was solely

responsible for testing the evidence in this case is the scientist found to have committed misconduct. 

While there is evidence remaining that is available to retest in this case, that evidence was in the
2

custody of the lab technician in question. This Court believes his actions are not reliable therefore

custody was compromised, resulting in a due process violation. Applicant is therefore entitled to

relief. 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 09CR3504 in the 212 District Court of

th

Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston

County. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of

this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 20, 2013

Do Not Publish
#### Peter B. Nelson v. William R. Alling, Trustee.

Filed May 17, 1899.

No. 10581.

1. Judicial Sale: Refusal to Vacate: Appraisement: Review. An order denying a motion to vacate a .-judicial sale on the ground that the appraisement was too low will not be set aside when based on substantially conflicting evidence.

*6072. -: Appraisement. An appraisement of real estate for the purposes of a. judicial sale cannot be successfully assailed on the ground that the appraisers were mistaken in their valuation of the property.

3. District Courts: Special Terms. By section 25, chapter 19, Compiled Statutes 1897, a judge of the district court is authorized to appoint and hold a special term of court in any county of Ms district for the transaction of any judicial business that may properly come before Mm.

Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Westover, J.

*Af/irnied.*

*Allen G. Fisher,*'for plaintiff in error.

*Albert W. Grites, contra.*

Sullivan, J.

This proceeding in error brings before us for review an order of the district court of Dawes county confirming a judicial sale of real estate. The defendant Nelson resisted the motion for confirmation on the grounds that the appraisers proceeded irregularly in making the appraisement, and that the valuation fixed by them upon the property was too low. The district court having decided these questions upon substantially conflicting evidence, its decision will not be disturbed. *(Nebraska Loan & Building Ass'n v. Marshall,*51 Neb. 534.) In the case cited the rule was applied under circumstances quite similar to those in the case at bar. But if the evidence bearing on the question of valuation were sufficient to establish fraud in the appraisement, we could not for that reason alone reverse the order of confirmation, there being in the motion to vacate the appraisal no allegation of fraud to which such evidence is responsive. It is now the established doctrine of this court that the appraisement cannot be successfully assailed merely because the appraisers were mistaken in their valuation of the property. *(Vought v. Foxworthy,*38 Neb. 790; *Ecklund v. Willis,*44 Neb. 129; *Kearney Land &*In*608*vestment Co. v. Aspinwall,*45 Neb. 601; *Brown v. Fitzpatrick,*56 Neb. 61; *Ballou v. Sherwood,*58 Neb. 20, 78 N. W. Rep. 383; *Lockwood v. Cook,*58 Neb. 302, 78 N. W. Rep. 624; *Michigan Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Richter,*58 Neb. 463, 78 N. W. Rep. 932.) The sale having been confirmed, at a special term held on September 27, 1898, the defendant challenges the jurisdiction of the court and denies the validity of the order. The point thus presented was considered and decided in the case of *Nelson v. Farmland Security Co.,*58 Neb. 604, 79 N. W. Rep. 161. It was there held that the term was properly convened and that the presiding judge was invested with authority to hear and determine causes properly on the calendar of the court. The judgment is

Affirmed.
(No. 5858

#### Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
§ 600.51 Purpose and scope. ( a ) A foreign institution is eligible to apply to participate in the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) programs if it is comparable to an eligible institution of higher education located in the United States and has been approved by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) This subpart E contains the procedures and criteria under which a foreign institution may be deemed eligible to apply to participate in the FFEL programs.
( c ) Applicability of other title IV, HEA program regulations. ( 1 ) A foreign institution must comply with all requirements for eligible and participating institutions except when made inapplicable by the HEA or when the Secretary, through publication in the Federal Register, identifies specific provisions as inapplicable to foreign institutions.
( 2 ) ( i ) A public or nonprofit foreign institution that meets the requirements of this subpart, and that also meets the requirements of this part except as provided in §§ 600.51(c)(1) and 600.54(a), is considered an “institution of higher education” for purposes of the title IV, HEA program regulations; and
( ii ) A for-profit foreign institution that meets the requirements of this subpart, and that also meets the requirements of this Part, except as provided in §§ 600.51(c)(1) and 600.54(a), is considered a “proprietary institution” for purposes of title IV, HEA program regulations.
( d ) ( 1 ) A program offered by a foreign school through any use of a telecommunications course, correspondence course, or direct assessment program is not an eligible program;
( 2 ) *Correspondence course* has the meaning given in § 600.2;
( 3 ) *Direct assessment program* has the meaning given in § 668.10(a)(1) of this chapter;
( 4 ) *Telecommunications course* is a course offered through any one or a combination of the technologies listed in the definition of telecommunications course in § 600.2, except that telecommunications technologies may be used to supplement and support instruction that is offered in a classroom located in the foreign country where the students and instructor are physically present.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1088)
[59 FR 22063, Apr. 28, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 45692, Aug. 9, 2006; 75 FR 67193, Nov. 1, 2010]