alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,197.99

 1,197.96

 1,197.93

 1,197.91

 1,197.88

 1,197.87

 1,197.85

 1,197.84

 1,197.82

 1,197.81

 1,197.79

 1,197.77

 1,197.74

 1,197.72

 1,197.70

 1,197.68

 1,197.66

 1,197.62

 1,197.60

 1,197.58

 1,197.56

 1,197.53

 1,197.50

 1,197.47

 1,197.45

 1,197.42

 1,197.38

 1,197.35

 1,197.32

 1,197.29

 1,197.26

 47.88

 47.83

 47.77

 47.74

 47.69

 47.67

 47.64

 47.62

 47.58

 47.57

 47.53

 47.50

 47.45

 47.41

 47.38

 47.34

 47.31

 47.24

 47.20

 47.17

 47.13

 47.08

 47.03

 46.98

 46.94

 46.89

 46.82

 46.77

 46.72

 46.67

 46.61

STORAGE

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.03

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.07

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

CHANGE

9

1

0

10

6

19

9

17

9

18

14

14

1

5

10

12

14

-5

12

13

10

-2

1

2

11

3

-9

-1

-1

1

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 15

 15

 14

 16

 20

 16

 15

 14

 15

 15

 20

 19

 15

 11

 16

 17

 20

 18

 18

 18

 16

 12

 15

 16

 17

 17

 14

 13

 13

 15

 16

C.F.S.

 .26

 .26

 .24

 .28

 .36

 .28

 .27

 .24

 .26

 .27

 .36

 .34

 .26

 .19

 .28

 .30

 .36

 .32

 .32

 .32

 .29

 .22

 .27

 .29

 .30

 .30

 .25

 .24

 .24

 .26

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/26/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.33 205 372 0 491 8.71 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,330 407 738 0 974

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 738

 738

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2010 .00

 47.91
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to Quarterly Report of Newport International
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Cery B. Perle, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: September 29, 2005                   /s/ Cery B. Perle
                                        -------------------------
                                             Cery B. Perle.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Chief Financial Officer)
### §1435a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 4, 1934, ch. 212, 48 Stat. 663, was transferred to section 91a of former Title 46, Shipping, and subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §690(c)(7), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2223.
§ 662.11 What is the role of the institution in the application process? An institution of higher education that participates in this program is responsible for— ( a ) Making fellowship application materials available to its students;
( b ) Accepting and screening applications in accordance with its own technical and academic criteria; and
( c ) Forwarding screened applications to the Secretary and requesting an institutional grant.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.03

 360.00

 360.00

 360.03

 360.00

 360.00

 360.00

 360.03

 360.00

 360.00

 360.06

 360.00

 360.03

 360.00

 360.00

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 539

 537

 537

 539

 537

 537

 537

 539

 537

 537

 541

 537

 539

 537

 537

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

-2

+0

+2

-2

+0

+0

+2

-2

+0

+4

-4

+2

-2

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 102

 137

 160

 227

 264

 271

 288

 283

 259

 240

 220

 221

 222

 223

 220

 221

 222

 219

 219

 221

 219

 216

 219

 217

 218

 223

 220

 219

 218

 218

 220

 208

 205

 203

 208

 205

 205

 203

 213

 206

 205

 209

 203

 202

 204

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TRI DAMS PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 GOODWIN RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 25, 2004

RES.

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2 0 6,608 3,117

ACRE-FEET -2 0 13,107 6,183

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

JOINT MAIN CANAL 28,874

SOUTH MAIN CANAL 6,183

 48,164

 539

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

TULLOCH

RELEASE

 219

 219

 222

 219

 220

 226

 224

 344

 361

 383

 375

 366

 485

 590

 705

 823

 991

 1,130

 938

 1,270

 1,401

 1,489

 1,385

 1,415

 1,447

 1,320

 1,289

 1,269

 1,262

 1,226

 1,400

 25,213

 50,010

JOINT MAIN OPERATED BY SSJID AND OID.

SOUTH MAIN OPERATED BY OID.

JOINT

MAIN

SOUTH

MAIN

SPILL 13,107

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 132

 136

 135

 132

 127

 242

 351

 453

 556

 700

 758

 746

 852

 896

 950

 835

 850

 887

 802

 792

 792

 790

 756

 887

 14,557

 28,874

RIVER CANALS
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 5,304 851 2,419 42,337 3,024

2 5,950 807 2,753 42,478 3,034

3 6,142 764 2,594 42,213 3,015

4 6,312 504 2,500 41,259 2,947

5 6,257 512 2,989 41,054 2,932

6 6,846 657 3,476 41,651 2,975

7 7,618 861 3,830 42,205 3,015

8 7,645 887 3,761 42,620 3,044

9 7,383 1,110 4,129 43,587 3,113

10 7,948 1,451 4,352 44,650 3,189

11 6,448 822 3,522 44,778 3,198

12 6,351 1,131 3,484 45,193 3,228

13 6,996 1,563 3,881 46,205 3,300

14 7,109 1,469 3,844 47,534 3,395

15 6,570 992 3,448 48,563 3,469

16 6,617 736 3,188 48,998 3,500

17 8,022 768 4,117 50,521 3,609

18 7,961 918 4,717 52,738 3,767

19 6,931 591 3,996 53,745 3,839

20 7,830 472 3,952 54,221 3,873

21 6,754 1,113 4,653 55,044 3,932

22 7,901 689 4,019 55,302 3,950

23 6,165 831 3,968 55,141 3,939

24 6,684 936 4,135 54,924 3,923

25 6,989 1,625 4,446 55,848 3,989

26 7,697 1,874 4,674 57,038 4,074

27 7,771 1,818 4,653 57,810 4,129

28 7,732 1,701 4,272 58,238 4,160

29 6,997 1,123 3,701 58,491 4,178

30 7,826 1,035 4,033 59,336 4,238

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Period: September 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 306

 369

 359

 371

 456

 593

 641

 913

 1,210

 1,570

 1,585

 1,347

 803

 564

 558

 636

 488

 524

 315

 289

 263

 385

 378

 492

 500

 537

 566

 606

 842

 987

 620

 192

 195

 189

 184

 193

 188

 187

 201

 210

 237

 235

 246

 211

 210

 207

 210

 193

 193

 187

 181

 168

 179

 186

 196

 206

 216

 214

 212

 231

 184

 189

 229

 238

 222

 221

 236

 249

 256

 352

 446

 572

 569

 520

 378

 295

 271

 269

 246

 245

 216

 209

 208

 228

 230

 270

 284

 296

 294

 321

 397

 334

 282

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,042

 3,090

 3,123

 3,150

 3,192

 3,247

 3,300

 3,445

 3,677

 4,018

 4,340

 4,624

 4,752

 4,783

 4,825

 4,856

 4,880

 4,904

 4,884

 4,844

 4,796

 4,672

 4,456

 4,154

 3,869

 3,645

 3,561

 3,587

 3,713

 3,778

 3,814

 217

 221

 223

 225

 228

 232

 236

 246

 263

 287

 310

 330

 339

 342

 345

 347

 349

 350

 349

 346

 343

 334

 318

 297

 276

 260

 254

 256

 265

 270

 272

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 504.15

 505.46

 507.11

 508.10

 509.30

 510.19

 510.88

 511.54

 512.40

 513.01

 513.58

 514.40

 515.26

 516.00

 516.30

 516.43

 516.80

 517.20

 517.56

 518.24

 518.70

 519.27

 519.80

 520.40

 521.05

 521.66

 522.26

 522.74

 522.63

 1,555,546

 1,570,761

 1,589,997

 1,601,577

 1,615,651

 1,626,117

 1,634,247

 1,642,037

 1,652,206

 1,659,432

 1,666,194

 1,675,938

 1,686,178

 1,695,007

 1,698,591

 1,700,145

 1,704,570

 1,709,358

 1,713,671

 1,721,829

 1,727,355

 1,734,211

 1,740,594

 1,747,830

 1,755,680

 1,763,059

 1,770,327

 1,776,149

 1,774,814

 7,676

 7,623

 7,849

 6,275

 4,828

 5,723

 6,041

 3,175

 5,098

 5,982

 5,976

 5,040

 5,014

 4,437

 3,604

 1,677

 2,309

 1,691

 0

 0

 0

 3,082

 2,292

 2,264

 2,259

 1,672

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,376

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 20, 2008

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2008 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 232,583 3,376 3,196 88,066

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 13,315

 15,215

 19,236

 11,580

 14,074

 10,466

 8,130

 7,790

 10,169

 7,226

 6,762

 9,744

 10,240

 8,829

 3,584

 1,554

 4,425

 4,788

 4,313

 8,158

 5,526

 6,856

 6,383

 7,236

 7,850

 7,379

 7,268

 5,822

-1,335

 38

 34

 33

 35

 34

 33

 25

 50

 60

 67

 70

 66

 69

 74

 52

 108

 87

 95

 152

 176

 220

 227

 221

 217

 225

 214

 169

 207

 138

7,360

7,252

7,762

5,964

4,242

5,363

5,418

2,838

4,777

5,858

5,645

4,597

4,601

3,858

3,279

1,556

1,501

1,678

-501

918

-368

2,383

2,175

1,445

1,698

1,184

-440

-493

-3,484

ELEV STORAGE

 101,587

 781,519

 788,771

 796,533

 802,497

 806,739

 812,102

 817,520

 820,358

 825,135

 830,993

 836,638

 841,235

 845,836

 849,694

 852,973

 854,529

 856,030

 857,708

 857,207

 858,125

 857,757

 860,140

 862,315

 863,760

 865,458

 866,642

 866,202

 865,709

 862,225

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 774,159

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Your Domain.com (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Anthony DeMint                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 1, 2005
#### Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. William H. Bond, Administrator.

Filed April 6, 1899.

No. 8822.

Death by Wrongful Act: Pecuniary Injury’: Pleading. In an action for damages under the provisions of chapter 21, Compiled Statutes, a petition is fatally defective which discloses no survivor entitled by law to support by the person deceased, and in which, with reference to such survivor as is described, there is no averment of pecuniary injury. *Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.*v. *Van Buskirk,*58 Neb. 252, approved and followed.

Error from the district court of Dundy county. Tried below before Norris, J.

*Reversed.*

*W. 8. Morían, J. W. Deioeese,*and *F. E. Bishop,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. W. James*and *Seth F. Ereios, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

In this action instituted in the district court of Dundy county it was alleged that the death of Maud Bond had been caused by reason of the carelessness and negligence of the plaintiff in error, and the defendant in error had been duly appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased person. In the petition there appeared the following statement relative to damages: “The said Maud Bond has neither husband nor children, but left William *386H. Bond and Sarah C. Bond, hex’ parents, and Susan C. Bond, John W. Bond, Clarence E. Bond, Jessie Bond, Mamie Bond, and Herman L. Bond, brother’s and sisters, who are heirs at law and next of kin, who have been damaged in the sum of $5,000.” Issues were joined, and as the result of a trial judgment was rendered against the company, and for it there has been presented to this court a petition in eri’or.

The contention is that the averment of the petition in regard to danxages was insufficient. A suit which was predicated upon the same facts and circumstances was commenced and tried in the district court of Dundy county with a like termination. The language of the petition in that case on the subject of damages did not differ in effect from the one in the case at bar. That case was removed to this court by petition in error and the same question of the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s pleading was raised as in this. It was therein determined that in an action as was that under the provisions of chapter 21 of the Compiled Statutes, the statutory law in respect to damages for death of a person caused by a wrongful act, neglect, or default, a petition was wholly insufficient in which there was not shown to be a party survivor who was dependent upon, or legally entitled to, support by the person whose death had been so caused, if there was also' in the pleading a lack of statement of pecuniary injury to the persons therein alleged as survivors. *Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Van Buskirk,*58 Neb. 252. See, also, *City of Friend v. Burleigh,*53 Neb. 674.) A i’e-examination of the matter has produced no change in our views on the subject of the sufficiency of the statement which was attacked in each case, and it follows that the judgment must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.42 Data for application, Form 5150.22. ( a ) Unless waived under § 20.43, each application on Form 5150.22 shall include as applicable, the following information: ( 1 ) Serial number and purpose for which filed.
( 2 ) Name and principal business address.
( 3 ) Based on the bona fide requirements of the applicant, the estimated quantity of all formulations of specially denatured spirits, in gallons, which will be procured during a 12-month period.
( 4 ) Location, or locations where specially denatured spirits will be sold or used if different from the business address.
( 5 ) Statement that specially denatured spirits will be stored in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( 6 ) For user applications, statement as to the intended use (e.g., cosmetics, external medicines, solvents, fuels, mouthwashes, laboratory uses, inks, etc.) to be made of the specially denatured spirits, and whether recovery, restoration, and redenaturation processes will be used.
( 7 ) Statement as to the type of business organization and of the persons interested in the business, supported by the items of information listed in § 20.45.
( 8 ) Listing of the principal equipment to be used in recovery processes, including processing tanks, storage tanks, and equipment for recovery, restoration, and redenaturation of denatured spirits (including the serial number, kind, capacity, names and addresses of manufacturer and owner of distilling apparatus along with intended use).
( 9 ) List of trade names under which the applicant will conduct operations, and the offices where these names are registered.
( 10 ) Listing of the titles of offices, the incumbents of which are responsible for the specially denatured spirits activities of the business and are authorized by the articles of incorporation, the bylaws, or the board of directors to act and sign on behalf of the applicant.
( 11 ) Other information and statements as the appropriate TTB officer may require to establish that the applicant is entitled to the permit. In the case of a corporation or other legal entity, the appropriate TTB officer may require information which establishes that the officers, directors and principal stockholders whose names are required to be furnished under § 20.45 (a)(2) and (c) have not violated or conspired to violate any law of the United States relating to intoxicating liquor or have been convicted of any offense under Title 26, U.S.C., punishable as a felony or of any conspiracy to commit such offense.
( b ) If any of the information required by paragraphs (a)(4) through (a)(10) and any information which may be required under paragraph (a)(11) of this section is on file with any appropriate TTB officer, the applicant may incorporate this information by reference by stating that the information is made a part of the application.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear by T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, 5479, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 25.51 Right of Entry and Examination.

An appropriate TTB officer may enter, during normal business hours, a brewery or other place where beer is stored and may, when the premises are open at other times, enter those premises in the performance of official duties. Appropriate TTB officers may make inspections as the appropriate TTB officer deems necessary to determine that operations are conducted in compliance with the law and this part. The owner of any building or place where beer is produced, made, or kept, or person having charge over such premises, who refuses to admit an appropriate TTB officer acting under 26 U.S.C. 7606, or who refuses to permit an appropriate TTB officer to examine beer must, for each refusal, forfeit $500.

[T.D. ATF-437, 66 FR 5478, Jan. 19, 2001]
#### § 76.722 Subgrantee reporting requirements.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70340, Aug. 29, 2024.

A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1231a, and 3474)

[72 FR 3703, Jan. 25, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                   3,922,660
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,346,134
<ALLOWANCES>                             (13,717)
<INVENTORY>                              2,923,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         9,680,938
<PP&E>                                   3,628,095
<DEPRECIATION>                           (2,017,622)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           19,769,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,956,245
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 10,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              200
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             19,769,028
<SALES>                                  8,255,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         8,255,607
<CGS>                                    4,101,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,378,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         46,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       435,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,706,248)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,706,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,706,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.21)






</TABLE>
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 755

- CV

IN RE Carlos Y. BENAVIDES, JR. and wife, Leticia R. BENAVIDES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 18, 2011, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

emergency relief. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relators have not demonstrated they are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus and moti on for emergency relief are DENIED. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011PB681L2 , styled In the Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos

Benavides, Jr., An Incapacitated Person

, pending in the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas, the

Honorable Jesus Garza presiding.