alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 463.750 When and how can a one-stop partner appeal a one-stop infrastructure amount designated by the State under the State infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) The Governor must establish a process, described under sec. 121(h)(2)(E) of WIOA, for a one-stop partner administering a program described in §§ 463.400 through 463.410 to appeal the Governor's determination regarding the one-stop partner's portion of funds to be provided for one-stop infrastructure costs. This appeal process must be described in the Unified State Plan.
( b ) The appeal may be made on the ground that the Governor's determination is inconsistent with proportionate share requirements in § 463.735(a), the cost contribution limitations in § 463.735(b), the cost contribution caps in § 463.738, consistent with the process described in the State Plan.
( c ) The process must ensure prompt resolution of the appeal in order to ensure the funds are distributed in a timely manner, consistent with the requirements of 20 CFR 683.630.
( d ) The one-stop partner must submit an appeal in accordance with State's deadlines for appeals specified in the guidance issued under § 463.705(b)(3), or if the State has not set a deadline, within 21 days from the Governor's determination.
§ 463.225 Under what circumstances may local areas appeal a reorganization plan? ( a ) The Local WDB and chief elected official for a local area that is subject to a reorganization plan under WIOA sec. 116(g)(2)(A) may appeal to the Governor to rescind or revise the reorganization plan not later than 30 days after receiving notice of the reorganization plan. The Governor must make a final decision within 30 days after receipt of the appeal.
( b ) The Local WDB and chief elected official may appeal the final decision of the Governor to the Secretary of Labor not later than 30 days after receiving the decision from the Governor. Any appeal of the Governor's final decision must be: ( 1 ) Appealed jointly by the Local WDB and chief elected official to the Secretary of Labor under 20 CFR 683.650; and
( 2 ) Must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the Governor.
( c ) Upon receipt of the joint appeal from the Local WDB and chief elected official, the Secretary of Labor must make a final decision within 30 days. In making this determination the Secretary of Labor may consider any comments submitted by the Governor in response to the appeals.
( d ) The decision by the Governor on the appeal becomes effective at the time it is issued and remains effective unless the Secretary of Labor rescinds or revises the reorganization plan under WIOA sec. 116(g)(2)(C).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.34

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.64

 1,198.65

 1,198.56

 1,198.48

 1,198.43

 1,198.41

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.35

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 48.50

 48.50

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.44

 48.44

 49.03

 49.05

 48.89

 48.75

 48.66

 48.62

 48.59

 48.57

 48.53

 48.53

 48.52

 48.52

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.58

+0.02

-0.16

-0.14

-0.09

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

75

84

69

76

77

62

75

74

73

73

68

73

60

65

654

387

193

126

105

121

102

109

82

93

84

94

66

72

80

82

81

INFLOW

 79

 79

 72

 72

 72

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 66

 60

 60

 358

 370

 268

 192

 147

 130

 115

 108

 93

 93

 86

 86

 72

 66

 66

 66

 66

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 5

 5

 6

 4

 5

 5

 9

 8

 7

 7

 2

 7

 9

 5

 2

 8

 6

 5

 3

 9

 5

 10

 7

 0

 7

 8

 12

 15

 14

 16

 15

C.F.S.

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .15

 .14

 .13

 .12

 .03

 .12

 .15

 .08

 .04

 .14

 .10

 .09

 .06

 .15

 .09

 .18

 .13

 .00

 .13

 .14

 .21

 .27

 .25

 .28

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 1.02

 .00

 .35

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/11/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.09 3,535 0 3,338 226 3.95 1.80

ACRE-FEET -90 7,012 0 6,621 448

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 6,621

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 6,621

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.80

JULY 1, 2002 17.87

 48.52
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,507

 3,625

 3,804

 3,052

 2,582

 1,952

 1,742

 1,447

 1,751

 2,690

 3,677

 4,145

 3,970

 4,097

 4,833

 4,757

 3,530

 4,186

 3,515

 3,739

 3,489

 2,581

 1,962

 3,387

 3,393

 3,840

 4,349

 5,443

 5,529

 5,898

 5,356

 255

 284

 295

 276

 295

 264

 285

 294

 265

 263

 274

 320

 277

 336

 430

 321

 354

 317

 356

 354

 347

 358

 351

 328

 311

 317

 441

 375

 329

 371

 478

 912

 1,003

 1,059

 992

 825

 726

 651

 571

 603

 670

 1,037

 1,124

 1,084

 1,320

 1,616

 1,531

 1,271

 1,293

 1,280

 1,384

 1,347

 973

 806

 879

 867

 977

 1,384

 1,782

 1,961

 2,123

 1,999

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,323

 8,703

 9,106

 9,434

 9,625

 9,741

 9,868

 10,004

 10,257

 10,608

 11,269

 11,771

 12,102

 12,577

 13,281

 13,809

 14,021

 14,322

 14,777

 15,435

 16,131

 16,533

 16,736

 16,945

 16,775

 16,628

 16,928

 17,390

 17,735

 18,327

 19,055

 595

 622

 650

 674

 688

 696

 705

 715

 733

 758

 805

 841

 864

 898

 949

 986

 1,002

 1,023

 1,056

 1,103

 1,152

 1,181

 1,195

 1,210

 1,198

 1,188

 1,209

 1,242

 1,267

 1,309

 1,361

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 34,138 4 LIONEL ROCKYMORE, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Brett Lovelace, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 12 Sergio J. Viscoli, Assistant Public Defender 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 WECHSLER, Judge. 172 {1} Defendant Lionel Rockymore appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the 1 metropolitan court’s sentencing order, file d after Defendant entered a conditional no 2 contest plea to driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI), first 3 offense; no seat belt; and expired registration. In this Court’s notice of proposed 4 disposition, we proposed to adopt the memorandum opinion of the district court and 5 affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition, which we have duly considered. 6 We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s arguments and therefore affirm. 7 {2} Defendant responded to our notice of proposed disposition with a memorandum 8 in opposition, in which he recites the samefacts and continues to raise the same 9 arguments that he made in his docketing statement. “A party responding to a summary 10 calendar notice must come forward and specifi cally point out errors of law and fact[,]” 11 and the repetition of earlier arguments does not fulfill this requirement. State v. 12 Mondragon , 1988-NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003, superseded by 13 statute on other grounds as stated in State v. Harris , 2013-NMCA-031, ¶ 3, 297 P.3d 14 374. Because Defendant does not raise any new arguments or issues to convince us 15 to reconsider our proposed disposition, we adopt the district court’s memorandum 16 opinion. See Hennessy v. Duryea , 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 17 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held th at, in summary calendar cases, the burden is 183 on the party opposing the proposeddisposition to clearly point out errors in fact or 1 law.”). 2 {3} For the reasons stated in this opinion, our notice of proposed summary 3 disposition, and the memorandum opinion of the district court, we affirm. 4 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________ ______________________ 6 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

________________________________ 9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 10

________________________________ 11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 12
##### 



Exhibit (23)(ii)(A) (PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO) CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Offering Circular constituting part of
the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 033-41418) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 27, 1991 of our report dated March 9, 2005 relating to the financial statements,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, on page F-2 in Imperial Oil Limiteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Experts in such
Offering Circular.  /s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
     PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other
member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers InternationalLimited, each of which is a separate and
independent legal entity.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
P. LoCascio, Chief Executive Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 11, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ ROBERT
      P. LOCASCIOName:
                    Robert
      P. LoCascioTitle:
                    Chief
      Executive
Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
§ 657.34 Under what circumstances must an institution terminate a fellowship? An institution shall terminate a fellowship if— ( a ) The fellow is not making satisfactory progress, is no longer enrolled, or is no longer in good standing at the institution; or
( b ) The fellow fails to follow the course of study, including modern foreign language study, for which he or she applied, unless a revised course of study is otherwise approvable under this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


As  independent  accountants,  we hereby  consent to the use of our report dated
April  2,  1998,  and  to  all  references  to  our  Firm  including  in  or  by
incorporation  by  reference  made a part of the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
China Continental, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 1997.


 
                                       /s/  Blackman Kallick Bartelstein
                                       BLACKMAN KALLICK BARTELSTEIN, LLP



Chicago, Illinois
May 12, 1998
### §3006. Presidential action on Commission recommendations

#### (a) In general

The President may proclaim modifications, based on the recommendations by the Commission under section 3005 of this title, to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule if the President determines that the modifications—

(1) are in conformity with United States obligations under the Convention; and

(2) do not run counter to the national economic interest of the United States.

#### (b) Lay-over period

(1) The President may proclaim a modification under subsection (a) only after the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the President submits a report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate that sets forth the proposed modification and the reasons therefor.

(2) The 60-day period referred to in paragraph (1) shall be computed by excluding—

(A) the days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 3 days to a day certain or an adjournment of the Congress sine die; and

(B) any Saturday and Sunday, not excluded under subparagraph (A), when either House is not in session.

#### (c) Effective date of modifications

Modifications proclaimed by the President under subsection (a) may not take effect before the 30th day after the date on which the text of the proclamation is published in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1206, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1151; Pub. L. 109–432, div. D, title III, §3012, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3177.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule, referred to in subsec. (a), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section 1202 of this title.

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–432 substituted "30th" for "15th".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Authority

Memorandum of President of the United States, Dec. 12, 1991, 56 F.R. 65413, provided:

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code and the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (Public Law 100–418) ("the Act") [see Tables for classification], you are hereby delegated the functions vested in me by section 1206(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 3006(b)), to submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate reports that set forth proposed modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule [see 19 U.S.C. 1202] and the reasons therefor.

The President shall retain the authority under section 1206 of the Act to proclaim modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule after the layover period specified in section 1206(b) has expired.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

George Bush.
James E. Kane (VSB #30081) 

KANE & PAPA, P.C. 

1313 East Cary Street 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Telephone: (804) 225-9500 

Facsimile: (804) 225-9598 

Email: jkane@kaneandpapa.com 

Counsel for Debtors 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division 

____________________________________ 

IN RE: ) 

 ) 

JOSEPH ANTHONY NICOTERA ) Case No. 20-31700-KLP 

CAROLYN MARIE NICOTERA ) Chapter 13 

) 

 Debtors ) 

 ) 

VIRGINIA PARTNERS BANK ) 

 ) 

 Movant ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

JOSEPH ANTHONY NICOTERA, ET AL. ) 

 ) 

 Respondents ) 

DEBTORS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR IN REM RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY 

COME NOW the Debtors, by counsel, and as and for Debtors’ Response to Virginia 

Partners Bank’s (“VPB”) Motion for In Rem Relief From the Automatic Stay (“Motion”), state 

as follows: 

 1. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15 

of the Motion are admitted. 

 2. The allegations contained in paragraphs 7, 14, 16, and 17 of the Motion are 

denied and the Debtors demand strict proof thereof. 

Case 20-31700-KLP Doc 21 Filed 04/24/20 Entered 04/24/20 11:47:55 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

 WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that VPB’s Motion for Relief From the 

Automatic Stay be denied, and for such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. 

 JOSEPH ANTHONY NICOTERA 

 CAROLYN MARIE NICOTERA 

 By: /s/ James E. Kane 

 Counsel 

James E. Kane (VSB #30081) 

KANE & PAPA, P.C. 

1313 East Cary Street 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Telephone: (804) 225-9500 

Facsimile: (804) 225-9598 

Email: jkane@kaneandpapa.com 

Counsel for Debtors 

Case 20-31700-KLP Doc 21 Filed 04/24/20 Entered 04/24/20 11:47:55 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on April 24, 2020, I will electronically file the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will then send a notification of such filing 

(NEF) to all parties registered to receive notice thereof. 

 /s/ James E. Kane 

James E. Kane (VSB #30081) 

KANE & PAPA, P.C. 

1313 East Cary Street 

Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Telephone: (804) 225-9500 

Facsimile: (804) 225-9598 

Email: jkane@kaneandpapa.com 

Case 20-31700-KLP Doc 21 Filed 04/24/20 Entered 04/24/20 11:47:55 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
### SUBCHAPTER III—APPLICATION OF AGREEMENT TO SECTORS AND SERVICES
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7392]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of al-Aqsa 
Martyrs' Brigade aka al-Aqsa Martyrs' Battalion as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, As Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-7624 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Global Ecology Corporation. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  April 14, 2010By: /s/ Peter D. UbaldiChief Executive OfficerDatePeter D. Ubaldi  The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
#### HOLT, Appellant, v. SCHREINER, Respondent.

(269 N. W. 484.)

(File No. 7942.

Opinion filed November 9, 1936.)

*620
      *George Tlvwing,*of Timber Lake, for Appellant.

*P. M. Burns,*of Timber Lake, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record' in this case that on the 14th day of July, 1934, a sheriff’s sale was held foreclosing a mortgage held by the appellant against the real property involved herein. The normal time of redemption from such mortgage foreclosure sale was to expire on the 14th day of July, 1935. ITowever, on the nth day of July, 1935, the respondent herein petitioned the circuit court of Dewey county for an extension of the time for redemption under the provisions of chapter 178 of the Session Laws of South Dakota for the year 1935. On the 12th day of July, 1935, the circuit court of Dewey county entered judgment in an action tried in the April term of that court, quieting title to the real property involved in this action in the present appellant, as against the present respondent. On August 5, 1933, the said circuit court issued! an order extending the time for redemption from the aforementioned mortgage foreclosure sale until March 1, 1937. An appeal was perfected in the “quiet title” action as well as in the instant action. The plaintiff and respondent in the “quiet title” action is the plaintiff and appellant in the instant action.

In view of the fact that this court has affirmed the' judgment of the circuit court, quieting title to the real property involved herein, in the present appellant as against the present respondent, Holt v. Schreiner 64 S. D. 593, 269 N. W. 375, a determination of the issues arising on this appeal becomes unnecessary.

The order appealed from is- reversed, and the trial court is instructed to dismiss the proceeding.

All the Judges concur.