alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,100

 1,742

 1,461

 1,650

 2,068

 2,688

 3,142

 2,786

 3,125

 3,289

 3,272

 2,284

 2,049

 3,195

 4,458

 5,813

 5,818

 5,458

 3,832

 3,900

 4,044

 3,844

 3,732

 4,123

 2,818

 1,924

 550

 447

 856

 1,053

 543

 295

 276

 312

 302

 320

 366

 439

 432

 548

 406

 411

 486

 504

 443

 375

 501

 430

 343

 286

 279

 279

 305

 261

 260

 459

 308

 324

 301

 313

 322

 279

 1,067

 597

 457

 519

 616

 893

 1,020

 1,003

 1,121

 1,262

 1,255

 987

 943

 1,472

 1,751

 2,349

 2,446

 1,819

 1,294

 926

 1,085

 1,174

 1,186

 1,439

 997

 687

 429

 356

 377

 384

 343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 55,352

 51,462

 47,343

 43,003

 38,397

 33,830

 29,690

 26,080

 23,261

 21,073

 18,883

 16,589

 13,724

 13,212

 13,896

 15,648

 17,637

 18,937

 19,615

 19,648

 19,713

 19,884

 19,949

 20,126

 19,868

 19,568

 19,054

 17,938

 16,564

 14,599

 12,496

 3,954

 3,676

 3,382

 3,072

 2,743

 2,416

 2,121

 1,863

 1,662

 1,505

 1,349

 1,185

 980

 944

 993

 1,118

 1,260

 1,353

 1,401

 1,403

 1,408

 1,420

 1,425

 1,438

 1,419

 1,398

 1,361

 1,281

 1,183

 1,043

 893

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 19.401 Authorized transactions. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor of a distilled spirits plant may transfer spirits and wines in bond to other distilled spirits plants, receive spirits and wines in bond from other distilled spirits plants, receive spirits from customs custody, and withdraw spirits from the distilled spirits plant without payment of tax or free of tax under certain conditions. This subpart sets forth the rules that a proprietor must follow when so transferring, receiving, or withdrawing spirits and wines and also includes related rules for taking samples and securing conveyances.
( b ) *Other transfers and withdrawals.* For withdrawals of spirits from bonded premises on determination or payment of tax, see subpart I of this part. For rules regarding withdrawals for exportation and transfers to foreign trade zones or to customs bonded warehouses, see part 28 of this chapter.
(26 U.S.C. 5181, 5212, 5213, 5214, 5232, 5362, 5373)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5235 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5235

   To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require States to 
  include a photograph on electronic benefit cards issued to provide 
          supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2019

    Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Norman, and Mr. Wilson of South 
  Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require States to 
  include a photograph on electronic benefit cards issued to provide 
          supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 7(h)(9) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2016(h)(9)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading by striking ``Optional'' and inserting 
        ``Mandatory'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``If'' and all that 
        follows through ``(A), the'' and inserting ``The''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,197.23

 1,197.20

 1,197.18

 1,197.14

 1,197.11

 1,197.08

 1,197.05

 1,197.02

 1,196.98

 1,196.96

 1,196.92

 1,196.89

 1,196.86

 1,196.82

 1,196.80

 1,196.77

 1,196.74

 1,196.70

 1,196.67

 1,196.64

 1,196.61

 1,196.57

 1,196.53

 1,196.50

 1,196.49

 1,196.47

 1,196.44

 1,196.41

 1,196.37

 1,196.34

 1,196.31

 46.56

 46.51

 46.48

 46.41

 46.35

 46.30

 46.25

 46.20

 46.13

 46.10

 46.03

 45.98

 45.93

 45.86

 45.82

 45.77

 45.72

 45.66

 45.60

 45.55

 45.50

 45.43

 45.37

 45.32

 45.30

 45.27

 45.21

 45.16

 45.10

 45.04

 44.99

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.03

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.07

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.05

CHANGE

-1

2

8

4

3

2

2

3

-9

8

-6

-2

2

-6

11

0

4

-1

0

1

5

-5

-8

5

21

21

1

1

-16

-2

-4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 12

 12

 12

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

OUTLET

 13

 16

 13

 16

 15

 14

 14

 15

 12

 11

 14

 9

 14

 14

 14

 12

 16

 19

 12

 13

 17

 15

 12

 16

 16

 24

 13

 13

 4

 10

 8

C.F.S.

 .24

 .28

 .23

 .28

 .27

 .26

 .25

 .27

 .22

 .19

 .25

 .16

 .26

 .26

 .25

 .22

 .29

 .35

 .22

 .24

 .31

 .28

 .21

 .30

 .30

 .43

 .23

 .23

 .08

 .18

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/13/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.60 44 428 0 424 7.68 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,600 87 849 0 841

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 849

 849

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2010 .00

 46.61
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCorrelation of Structural Analysis and Test Results for the McDonnell Douglas Stitched/RFI All-Composite Wing Stub BoxThe analytical and experimental results of an all-composite wing stub box are presented in this report. The wing stub box, which is representative of an inboard portion of a commercial transport high-aspect-ratio wing, was fabricated from stitched graphite-epoxy material with a Resin Film Infusion manufacturing process. The wing stub box was designed and constructed by the McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Company as part of the NASA Advanced Composites Technology program. The test article contained metallic load-introduction structures on the inboard and outboard ends of the graphite-epoxy wing stub box. The root end of the inboard load introduction structure was attached to a vertical reaction structure, and an upward load was applied to the outermost tip of the outboard load introduction structure to induce bending of the wing stub box. A finite element model was created in which the center portion of the wing-stub-box upper cover panel was modeled with a refined mesh. The refined mesh was required to represent properly the geometrically nonlinear structural behavior of the upper cover panel and to predict accurately the strains in the stringer webs of the stiffened upper cover panel. The analytical and experimental results for deflections and strains are in good agreement.Document ID19960048076Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWang, John T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Jegley, Dawn C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Bush, Harold G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Hinrichs, Stephen C.*(McDonnell-Douglas Aerospace Long Beach, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110267NASA-TM-110267Accession Number96N33578Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-10-11-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048076.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrity Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Steven M. Skow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jeff Sanders,
Chief Financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/  Steven M. SkowSteven M. Skow, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Jeff L. SandersJeff L. Sanders, Senior VP - Finance(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) August 12, 2004
§ 668.44 Availability of employees for information dissemination purposes. ( a ) *Availability.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section each institution shall designate an employee or group of employees who shall be available on a full-time basis to assist enrolled or prospective students in obtaining the information specified in §§ 668.42, 668.43, 668.45 and 668.46.
( 2 ) If the institution designates one person, that person shall be available, upon reasonable notice, to any enrolled or prospective student throughout the normal administrative working hours of that institution.
( 3 ) If more than one person is designated, their combined work schedules must be arranged so that at least one of them is available, upon reasonable notice, throughout the normal administrative working hours of that institution.
( b ) *Waiver.* ( 1 ) the Secretary may waive the requirement that the employee or group of employees designated under paragraph (a) of this section be available on a full-time basis if the institution's total enrollment, or the portion of the enrollment participating in the title IV, HEA programs, is too small to necessitate an employee or group of employees being available on a full-time basis.
( 2 ) In determining whether an institution's total enrollment or the number of title IV, HEA program recipients is too small, the Secretary considers whether there will be an insufficient demand for information dissemination services among its enrolled or prospective students to necessitate the full-time availability of an employee or group of employees.
( 3 ) To receive a waiver, the institution shall apply to the Secretary at the time and in the manner prescribed by the Secretary.
( c ) The granting of a waiver under paragraph (b) of this section does not exempt an institution from designating a specific employee or group of employees to carry out on a part-time basis the information dissemination requirements.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1092)
[51 FR 43323, Dec. 1, 1986. Redesignated at 64 FR 59067, Nov. 1, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 12276, Mar. 16, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 201

 198

 232

 361

 654

 724

 793

 763

 603

 523

 414

 346

 344

 393

 343

 327

 317

 237

 343

 358

 320

 296

 333

 349

 304

 267

 285

 252

 268

 350

 423

 167

 169

 174

 177

 188

 192

 192

 197

 198

 200

 194

 189

 177

 174

 172

 171

 173

 173

 166

 166

 151

 152

 152

 155

 153

 143

 143

 145

 152

 157

 158

 175

 177

 184

 204

 256

 266

 284

 285

 279

 267

 255

 236

 230

 208

 195

 190

 189

 190

 201

 211

 191

 184

 195

 206

 196

 181

 175

 182

 193

 191

 195

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,427

 2,429

 2,439

 2,470

 2,554

 2,646

 2,760

 2,874

 2,981

 3,077

 3,157

 3,218

 3,273

 3,306

 3,326

 3,339

 3,344

 3,330

 3,275

 3,220

 3,127

 3,026

 2,942

 2,881

 2,822

 2,767

 2,712

 2,686

 2,684

 2,685

 2,691

 173

 174

 174

 176

 182

 189

 197

 205

 213

 220

 226

 230

 234

 236

 238

 239

 239

 238

 234

 230

 223

 216

 210

 206

 202

 198

 194

 192

 192

 192

 192

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.29

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.22

 1,198.21

 1,198.22

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 48.41

 48.39

 48.37

 48.37

 48.37

 48.36

 48.34

 48.32

 48.41

 48.41

 48.41

 48.39

 48.37

 48.36

 48.36

 48.32

 48.32

 48.28

 48.27

 48.28

 48.30

 48.28

 48.28

 48.30

 48.28

 48.27

 48.27

 48.27

 48.27

 48.27

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.09

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.04

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

+0.02

+0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

50

48

43

53

55

37

31

27

94

54

58

45

44

40

48

24

34

6

11

33

40

20

26

44

19

17

24

21

24

28

INFLOW

 48

 43

 38

 38

 38

 33

 29

 24

 48

 48

 48

 43

 38

 33

 33

 24

 24

 16

 12

 16

 20

 16

 16

 20

 16

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 10

 13

 13

 14

 16

 12

 10

 11

 1

 5

 9

 10

 14

 15

 14

 17

 9

 7

 7

 7

 10

 12

 9

 14

 11

 13

 11

 8

 11

 15

C.F.S.

 .17

 .22

 .23

 .24

 .28

 .21

 .17

 .20

 .01

 .08

 .16

 .18

 .24

 .26

 .25

 .29

 .15

 .12

 .13

 .13

 .18

 .21

 .16

 .24

 .20

 .22

 .20

 .14

 .19

 .27

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/26/2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.19 1,098 30 822 328 5.73 .49

ACRE-FEET -190 2,178 60 1,630 651

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,630

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 1,690

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .49

JULY 1, 2004 24.63

 48.43
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,097

 1,071

 1,054

 1,029

 997

 973

 958

 931

 906

 888

 871

 860

 849

 822

 807

 820

 805

 787

 778

 761

 739

 717

 687

 666

 662

 652

 647

 626

 992

 958

 933

 909

 886

 855

 860

 859

 856

 833

 779

 817

 806

 793

 751

 745

 724

 681

 666

 653

 656

 653

 661

 654

 645

 630

 616

 596

 1,033

 1,010

 1,000

 988

 962

 935

 914

 895

 883

 867

 847

 840

 827

 808

 775

 777

 768

 743

 732

 723

 710

 690

 673

 659

 653

 642

 633

 611

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

REPLACEMENT 14.0 $1,190.0

0

$0 $1,190.00 400 $476,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $476,000

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.132 U.S.P., N.F., and H.P.U.S. preparations. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided by paragraph (b) of this section or by TTB ruling, formulas for compounds in which alcohol is a prescribed quantitative ingredient, which are stated in the current revisions or editions of the United States Pharmacopoeia (U.S.P.), the National Formulary (N.F.), or the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (H.P.U.S.), shall be considered as approved formulas and may be used as formulas for drawback products without the filing of TTB Form 5154.1.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Alcohol (including dehydrated alcohol and dehydrated alcohol injection), U.S.P.; alcohol and dextrose injection, U.S.P.; and tincture of ginger, H.P.U.S., have been found to be fit for beverage use and are disapproved for drawback. All attenuations of other H.P.U.S. products diluted beyond one part in 10,000 (“4 × ”) are also disapproved for drawback, unless the manufacturer receives approval for a formula submitted on Form 5154.1 in accordance with this subpart. The formula for such attenuations shall be submitted with a sample of the product and a statement explaining why it should be classified as unfit for beverage use.
### §1863. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1501(b)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1259

Section, Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §127(c), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1993, directed that reports to Congress be submitted annually and within 60 days after any action was taken under section 1862 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of section applicable with respect to investigations initiated under section 1862(b) of this title on or after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1501(d)(1) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1862 of this title.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 1, 2012

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2011 2012 15

 496

 8,806

 7,500

 3,978

 2,575

 348

 457

 7,002

 4,000

 1,808

 251

 351

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2011 2012

 2,167

 3,341

 3,045

 740

 2,052

 642

 1,800

 2,592

 1,977

 452

 1,511

 251

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 356 318

 8,942 6,606

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,010

 3,971

 1,740

 607

 15

MILLERTON 1,041 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2012 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT 

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2012 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 26.15

 43.53

 57.31

 22.40

 24.89

 450

 7,027

 3,000

 1,748

 251

 236

 1,664 108

 2,692

 2,040

 541

 1,557

 323

 256

 6,777

 96

 97

 84

 97

 78

 124

 97

 32.86

 1,438

 5,953

 2,670

 1,101

 1,791

 70

 67

 65

 55

 58

 80

 63.18

 66.31

 27.59

 43.80

 69

 86

 81

 57

 50

 55

 37

 34

 37

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS

WY WY

WY WY