Steven N. Serajeddini, P.C. (pro hac vice admission pending) Michael A. Condyles (VA 27807)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Peter J. Barrett (VA 46179)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP Jeremy S. Williams (VA 77469)

601 Lexington Avenue Brian H. Richardson (VA 92477)

New York, New York 10022 KUTAK ROCK LLP

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1000

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Richmond, Virginia 23219-4071

Telephone: (804) 644-1700

-and- Facsimile: (804) 783-6192

David L. Eaton (pro hac vice admission pending)

Jaimie Fedell (pro hac vice admission pending)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP

300 North La Salle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Telephone: (312) 862-2000

Facsimile: (312) 862-2200

Proposed Co-Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 11

)

LE TOTE, INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-33332

)

Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested)

)

DECLARATION OF ED KREMER,

CHIEF RESTRUCTURING OFFICER OF LE TOTE, INC.,

IN SUPPORT OF CHAPTER 11 PETITIONS AND FIRST DAY MOTIONS

I, Ed Kremer, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:

1. I am the Chief Restructuring Officer of Le Tote, Inc. (“Le Tote”), a corporation 

organized under the laws of Delaware and one of the above-captioned debtors and debtors in 

possession (collectively, the “Debtors,” the “Company”).

 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number, are set forth in the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Directing Joint Administration of Chapter 

11 Cases and (II) Granting Related Relief filed contemporaneously herewith. The location of the Debtors’ service 

address is 250 Vesey Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10281.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 63
2

2. I have served in this role since March, 2020. Prior to becoming the Debtors’ Chief 

Restructuring Officer, I served as Chief Operating Officer since joining the Company in 

November, 2019. I previously served as a consultant to Le Tote since the end of 2018. Prior to 

joining the Company, I served as the Chief Executive Officer of Noon Home, Inc. and the Chief 

Financial Officer of 360fly, Inc. I also served as acting Chief Executive Officer of invention 

platform startup Quirky, Inc. (“Quirky”), and helped guide Quirky and its subsidiary Wink 

through their chapter 11 proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of 

New York. Before serving in those roles, I served as the Vice President of Finance at Beats by 

Dr. Dre. I hold a Bachelor’s of Business Administration in Finance from the University of 

Massachusetts at Amherst. In my capacity as Chief Restructuring Officer of the Debtors, I am 

generally familiar with the Debtors’ day-to-day operations, business and financial affairs, and 

books and records. I submit this declaration to assist the Court and parties in interest in 

understanding the circumstances compelling the commencement of these chapter 11 cases and in 

support of the Debtors’ chapter 11 petitions and certain motions and applications filed today.

3. Except as otherwise indicated, all facts in this declaration are based upon my 

personal knowledge, my discussions with the Debtors’ management team and advisors, my review 

of relevant documents and information concerning the Debtors’ operations, financial affairs, and 

restructuring initiatives, or my opinions based upon my experience and knowledge. I am over the 

age of eighteen and authorized to submit this declaration on behalf of the Debtors. If called upon 

to testify, I could and would testify competently to the facts set forth in this declaration.

Preliminary Statement

4. The Debtors are the combination of Le Tote—a venture-backed fashion rental 

subscription service founded in 2012 in San Francisco—and Lord & Taylor LLC 

(“Lord & Taylor”)—the iconic luxury retailer which traces its origins to 1826 in New York. 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 63
3

Through Le Tote and Lord & Taylor, the Debtors operate both an online, subscription-based 

clothing rental service and a full-service fashion retailer with 38 brick-and-mortar locations 

(the “Stores”) with a robust e-commerce platform. Through multiple business channels, the 

Debtors offer more than 150 brands of clothing and accessories for rental or sale. Le Tote acquired

Lord & Taylor from HBC US Holdings Inc. (“HBC Holdings”), a subsidiary of Hudson’s Bay 

Company ULC (f/k/a Hudson’s Bay Company) (“HBC”), and HBC US Propco Holdings LLC 

(“HBC Propco”), a subsidiary of HBC Holdings, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement (as 

amended from time to time, the “APA”) in a transaction which closed in November 2019

(the “Acquisition”). The Acquisition was premised on providing Le Tote access to brand 

recognition through the iconic Lord & Taylor name and access to new customers through Lord & 

Taylor’s preexisting customer base, while providing Lord & Taylor access to Le Tote’s proprietary 

technology and the ability break into the rental market during a time of declining sales at traditional 

retailers. In connection with the Acquisition, Le Tote entered into a Transition Services 

Agreement (the “TSA”) with certain affiliates of HBC to facilitate a smooth transition of the 

Lord & Taylor assets into the Le Tote organization. The TSA obligates HBC Propco and certain 

of its affiliates to provide mission-critical services necessary to the functioning of Lord & Taylor, 

such as accounting, human resources, IT services, and merchant support. Under the APA and as 

one of its primary benefits, HBC Propco is also obligated to pay rent for the Lord & Taylor physical 

locations (excluding common area maintenance and other similar charges). 

5. Even before the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, like many other retail 

companies, the Debtors were under significant pressure from adverse macro-trends, including 

increased competition among both online retailers and established brick-and-mortar retailers that 

have less leveraged capital structures and greater economies of scale. These factors have been 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 63
4

greatly compounded by the devastating impact of COVID-19 that has caused retailers throughout 

the country to close their doors. As states across the country ordered all “non-essential” businesses 

closed, the Debtors temporarily closed all retail locations in March 2020. Recently, as state and 

local jurisdictions have begun to relax stay-at-home orders, the Debtors begun to reopen Stores. 

Nevertheless, foot traffic has declined significantly compared to pre-COVID levels. COVID-19 

has also caused a drop in subscriptions for Le Tote, as the Company’s subscriber base has suffered 

from the wave of job losses gripping the country and the demand for apparel has diminished due 

to hundreds of millions of Americans being affected by stay-at-home orders. 

6. As a result of these factors, the Debtors’ revenue has declined precipitously from 

prior years and from pre-COVID forecasts. More specifically, with the increased debt service 

following the Acquisition, and the prolonged closure of the majority of the Debtors’ recently 

acquired Stores due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors are carrying the increased expenses 

associated with the Acquisition, as well as the brick-and-mortar assets which were unusable for a 

substantial period of time. These unprecedented market developments, compounded by 

lower-than-expected financial results and burdensome TSA charges, adversely impacted liquidity 

and left the Debtors overleveraged. To preserve liquidity in the months preceding this filing, the 

Debtors made the difficult decision to suspend the majority of their vendor payments and to 

furlough or lay off approximately 4,690 employees. As the Debtors have slowly begun to reopen 

Stores, they have recalled approximately 400 furloughed employees.

7. Faced with diminished liquidity, the Debtors and their advisors also engaged in 

vigorous negotiations with HBC and its affiliates in an effort to restructure the TSA payment 

obligations and limit go-forward services to only those services necessary in a post-COVID-19 

world. As a result of these efforts, the Debtors, HBC Holdings, and HBC Propco executed an 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 63
5

Omnibus Agreement Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) on April 10, 2020, which, among other 

things, offset certain amounts owed under the TSA against certain amounts owed by HBC to the 

Debtors, and also restructured go-forward services under the TSA to reflect the Debtors’ scaleddown enterprise. The Term Sheet greatly reduced the Debtors’ go-forward payments under the 

TSA.

8. Simultaneously, the Debtors engaged in arm’s-length negotiations with their 

prepetition secured lenders for continued funding during the store closures and throughout the 

pendency of these chapter 11 cases. Following extensive negotiations, the Debtors and their 

prepetition secured lenders came to an agreement regarding the consensual use of cash collateral

during these proceedings that will provide the Debtors with the breathing room necessary to 

continue retail sales while they market the valuable Le Tote and Lord & Taylor brands and 

proprietary technology in a process that the Debtors believe will maximize value for all 

stakeholders. 

9. The Debtors believe there remains value in their business as a going-concern, and 

have explored potential transactions surrounding Le Tote and Lord & Taylor in the preceding 

months. Accordingly, the Debtors intend to continue marketing the Le Tote and Lord & Taylor 

assets to maximize the value of their estates. Nonetheless, the Debtors recognize that they are 

beset by a perfect storm and cannot continue to operate Lord & Taylor in a business as usual 

fashion in the current environment. Recognizing this reality, the Debtors entered into a store 

closing agreement (as amended and restated, the “Consultant Agreement”) with Hilco Merchant 

Resources, LLC and Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC (“Consultant”) to conduct store closing 

sales at their Stores. The Debtors commenced “soft” store closing sales at some of their locations 

prepetition, and will continue such sales in all stores throughout the chapter 11 process.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 63
6

10. Recognizing the challenges that have beset many of their peers in the retail space 

who have filed for chapter 11 only to be unable to reorganize or confirm a plan without lengthy 

and expensive in-court proceedings, the Debtors have filed contemporaneously herewith a 

proposed chapter 11 plan (as may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time, 

the “Plan”). The Plan sets forth the key goals of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases: (1) to 

swiftly and efficiently monetize the value of the Debtors’ estates and (2) to distribute estate assets 

in accordance with the priorities of the Bankruptcy Code. 

11. To familiarize the Court with the Debtors, their businesses, the circumstances 

leading to these chapter 11 cases, and the relief the Debtors are seeking in those certain motions 

and applications filed contemporaneously herewith, I have organized this declaration as follows: 

• Part I provides a general overview of the Debtors’ corporate history

and operations; 

• Part II provides an overview of the Debtors’ prepetition corporate 

and capital structure;

• Part III describes the circumstances leading to these chapter 11 

cases;

• Part IV describes the Debtors’ prepetition restructuring efforts, 

including the relevant terms of the Plan; and

• Part V sets forth the evidentiary basis for the relief requested in 

each of the first day pleadings.

I. Corporate History and Business Operations.

A. Le Tote Corporate History.

12. Conceived in 2012 when Brett Northart and Rakesh Tondon noticed that their wives 

had to constantly buy new clothes for maternity, work, events, and other occasions, the two 

co-founders aimed to answer a simple question: why should consumers pay full price to own 

clothes that they won’t wear again? The original concept, which launched in 2012, allowed

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 63
7

customers to subscribe to a “tote” that included three garments and two accessories for one low 

monthly price. Consumers received their totes in the mail and could return the items when they 

were ready for a new tote, with the option to purchase items at 20%-70% off retail price. The 

Company, which operated out of Mr. Tondon’s home during its first year, has grown from a small 

San Francisco-based start up to a market-leading fashion rental subscription service. From 2014 

to 2018, the Company grew at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 122% and 

increased revenue from $2.5 million to $60.8 million, before experiencing a decline in 2019. Now 

with an advanced personalization algorithm and offerings from more than 150 brands, including 

French Connection, Vince Camuto, BCBGeneration, Sanctuary, Kate Spade, Rebecca Minkoff, 

Cole Haan, and Nike, Le Tote has been described as the “Netflix of fashion.”

13. In March 2015, following two initial years of explosive growth, Le Tote introduced 

the “tote swap” personalization feature to its rental subscription platform, which increased 

interface functionality by allowing customers to view a snapshot of the five pieces that would be 

contained in their totes and swap items for 24 hours. Prompted by high customer demand, shortly 

thereafter the Company expanded its rental subscription offerings to include maternity clothing. 

Based on customer feedback, the Company opened a waitlist to allow its customer base, including 

approximately 30% of customers who were mothers, to enroll in early access to Le Tote’s 

maternity offerings. As 2015 progressed, it became clear that Le Tote was “infectiously changing 

how consumers look[ed] at shopping.” In October of the same year, the Company debuted its 

mobile app, which provided customers with direct access to rent more than 150,000 pieces of 

clothing and accessories.

Le Tote China.

14. In 2017, just five years after the launch of the original “tote” concept, Le Tote 

became the first U.S. fashion rental subscription service to enter the Chinese market—the world’s 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 63
8

largest e-commerce market. Through a joint venture with an executive of China’s largest shoe 

retailer, the Company launched Le Tote China (the “Joint Venture”). Before opening to the general 

public, the Joint Venture admitted a select group of 3,000 women for “beta” testing, which 

provided the admitted customers with premier access to Le Tote China’s fashion rental 

subscription service and allowed the Joint Venture partners to navigate the Chinese consumer 

landscape. Le Tote China opened to the general public in the winter of 2017. 

15. The Joint Venture provides the same service as its U.S. counterpart to Chinese 

consumers: the ability to rent unlimited clothing and accessories for a flat monthly fee. Le Tote 

China is currently headquartered in Shenzhen, with satellite offices in Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong 

Kong and distribution centers in Dongguan, Beijing, and Shanghai. Le Tote is a direct, minority 

equity holder in Le Tote Venture Limited and thereby an indirect, minority equity holder in 

Le Tote (Hong Kong) Limited and Le Tote (Shenzhen) Technology Limited. The entities that 

comprise the Joint Venture are not Debtors in these chapter 11 cases.

B. Lord & Taylor Corporate History.

16. In 1824, Samuel Lord started a dry goods business in New York and, in 1826, 

opened the nation’s first department store. George Washington Taylor joined Samuel Lord in the 

enterprise in 1834, and the two renamed the store Lord & Taylor. Lord & Taylor opened its second 

store in 1859 in New York’s modern-day SoHo neighborhood and, by 1894, was growing quickly. 

It would open stores on Fifth Avenue in 1903 and 1906 and become a publicly traded entity in 

1904. The Lord & Taylor Building, which housed Lord & Taylor’s premier department store and 

corporate headquarters, opened in February of 1914 and, when Samuel Reyburn became president 

of Lord & Taylor in 1916, began the tradition of holiday window displays. In 2007, the Lord & 

Taylor Building became a New York City Landmark. Further, in 1916, Lord & Taylor became a 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 63
9

founding member of Associated Dry Goods Company (later Corporation), an association of 

independent department stores, and was considered to be its “crown jewel.”

17. In the years following World War II, Lord & Taylor thrived under the leadership 

of Dorothy Shaver, the first woman to head a major retail establishment in the United States. 

Under Shaver, Lord & Taylor launched its first suburban branch store locations, introduced the 

concept of personal shoppers, and commissioned Lord & Taylor’s iconic logo. In 1986, the May 

Department Stores Company acquired Associated Dry Goods, including Lord & Taylor and other 

retail chains, in what was considered the largest ever retail acquisition at the time. Federated 

Department Stores (now Macy’s) later acquired May Department Stores Company in 2005, and, 

in 2006, sold Lord & Taylor to National Retail and Development Company Equity Partners

(“NRDC”), which held it privately. In 2008, NRDC acquired HBC and positioned Lord & Taylor 

under the HBC umbrella in 2012.

Le Tote’s Acquisition of Lord & Taylor.

18. In November 2019, Le Tote completed the Acquisition of certain assets comprising 

the Lord & Taylor business from HBC Holdings and HBC Propco, including an online retail 

platform, leases for 38 brick-and-mortar Stores situated throughout the United States, the inventory 

located at the Stores (or in HBC’s distribution centers and available for sale in the Stores), and 

Lord & Taylor intellectual property. The Acquisition expanded the range of clothing styles offered 

by Le Tote in its subscription-based service and represented the first acquisition of a long-standing 

brick-and-mortar retailer by a “digitally native” brand.2 Further, Le Tote hired the vast majority 

of Lord & Taylor’s Store employees and entered into the TSA, pursuant to which HBC Holdings 

 2 Coined by Marc Prensky in 2001, “digital native” was first used to refer to the generation that grew up and came 

of age using digital technology. Digitally native brands are companies that have only existed in the digital world, 

transacting primarily online with little or no brick-and-mortar presence.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 63
10

and HBC Propco must provide certain general and administrative functions related to the Lord & 

Taylor business to Le Tote through 2021 (subject to extension in accordance with the terms of the 

TSA) to assist with integration of the Lord & Taylor business into Le Tote.

19. The APA sets forth a complex arrangement with respect to the Stores. HBC Propco 

is obligated to pay fixed and percentage rent (excluding common area maintenance and other 

similar charges) (the “Operating Rent”) from November 8, 2019, until November 8, 2022 

(the “Rent Payment Period”). Only thereafter is Le Tote obligated under the APA to pay Operating 

Rent. The Stores are also subject to certain “Put” (by Le Tote) and “Call” (by HBC) rights under 

the APA. Upon the exercise of a “Put” or “Call” after the expiration of the Rent Payment Period,

Le Tote has no obligation to pay Operating Rent for the applicable Store, the lease with respect to 

which would be transferred back to affiliates of HBC. During the Rent Payment Period and 

thereafter, unless a “Put” or a “Call” has been exercised and effectuated, Le Tote is obligated to 

pay all other amounts related to the operation of the Stores due under any lease with respect to any 

Store, including all common area maintenance and similar charges (e.g., insurance, utilities and 

services, and real estate taxes).

20. As discussed in further detail herein, Le Tote financed the purchase price of the 

Acquisition through: (a) $75 million in cash (subject to adjustments as specified in the APA), 

including cash borrowed under a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL 

Credit Facility”) and a secured term loan credit facility (the “Term Loan Credit Facility”), 

(b) issuing a secured promissory note to HBC Propco in the original principal amount of 

approximately $30 million, and (c) issuing preferred shares convertible into approximately 25% 

of Le Tote’s post-closing issued and outstanding equity on a fully diluted basis, to HBC Propco.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 63
11

The TSA.

21. Le Tote, HBC Holdings, and HBC Propco, are also party to the TSA, dated as of 

November 8, 2019, pursuant to which Le Tote receives a wide variety of services, including 

accounting, human resources, IT services, and merchant support, among others, from HBC 

Holdings and HBC Propco on a transitional basis in connection with the Acquisition.

22. Since the Acquisition, certain service categories under the TSA have already been 

terminated, but with the majority of the Stores closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain 

services under the TSA remain mission-critical, specifically those services that support the 

Lord & Taylor e-commerce operations. As discussed above, in April 2020 Le Tote successfully 

renegotiated the TSA, resulting in a reduced array of services and greatly reducing their go-forward 

payment obligations.

C. Business Operations.

23. By pairing tradition and technology, Le Tote erases the lines between online and 

in-store retail services and offers its customers an innovative and intuitive retail experience across 

three business channels: (a) Le Tote fashion rental subscription service; (b) Lord & Taylor Stores 

and e-commerce; (c) cross-brand collaborations. Le Tote’s fashion rental subscription service 

allows women to rent unlimited clothing and accessories for a flat monthly fee while offering 

customers a truly personalized experience within Le Tote’s subscription service model, which is 

depicted below.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 63
12

24. In 2019, sales revenue through the rental subscription service was approximately 

$8.5 million and subscription revenue from the rental subscription service was approximately 

$24.1 million (exclusive of final sales). The Debtors continue to operate the fashion rental 

subscription service during the COVID-19 pandemic.

25. Le Tote leases the majority of the Lord & Taylor Stores from HBC or certain of 

HBC’s affiliates, which own or lease a majority of Store properties. Le Tote operates 

38 Lord & Taylor Stores across eleven different states and the District of Columbia, half of which 

are located in New York or New Jersey. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Le Tote implemented 

plans to operate the Lord & Taylor Stores as a key integrated component of the Company’s

business. Specifically, certain Lord & Taylor Stores were to serve as premier locations for Le Tote 

rental studios, facilitating Le Tote’s cross-brand collaboration efforts. Due to the COVID-19 

pandemic, the Debtors were forced to close the 38 Lord & Taylor Stores for a prolonged period.

26. The Debtors also maintain the Lord & Taylor e-commerce website 

www.lordandtaylor.com, and mobile applications across a variety of digital platforms, both of 

which the Debtors continue to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a digitally native retail 

brand, Le Tote has historically invested significantly into its digital presence and has continued to 

develop the Lord & Taylor website into a profitable and promising revenue channel since the 

Acquisition.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 63
13

Cross Brand Collaborations.

27. In addition to the fashion rental subscription service and the Lord & Taylor Stores 

and e-commerce website, the Debtors began cross-brand collaborations after acquiring 

Lord & Taylor. The first cross-brand collaboration between Le Tote and Lord & Taylor was in 

October 2019, when Le Tote launched its premier rental studio in the Ridge Hill, New York 

Lord & Taylor Store. The premier rental studio offers customers the opportunity to shop at 

Lord & Taylor, learn about Le Tote’s fashion rental subscription service first hand, browse a 

sampling of rental inventory, and have their measurements taken by a store associate. Customers 

who are already members of the rental subscription service may also return their totes at such 

locations. Due to the prolonged closure of the Lord & Taylor Stores as a result of the COVID-19 

pandemic, the Debtors were unable to fully implement cross-brand collaborations between Le Tote 

and Lord & Taylor. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had opened approximately four premier 

rental studios in Lord & Taylor Stores. 

D. Critical Components of Le Tote’s Cost Structure.

Supply Chain.

28. The Debtors maintain an integrated supply chain aimed at ensuring the 

uninterrupted flow of fresh merchandise for Le Tote’s fashion rental subscription service, the 

Lord & Taylor e-commerce website, and the brick-and-mortar Lord & Taylor locations. 

Generally, the Debtors contract with various domestic vendors to design and source the 

merchandise from foreign manufacturers. In limited circumstances, the Debtors contract with 

foreign manufacturers directly. Depending on the nature of the Debtors’ arrangement with a given 

vendor or manufacturer, the Debtors ship the merchandise to a domestic warehouse that serves as 

the Debtors’ distribution center.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 63
14

Employee Compensation and Benefits.

29. The Debtors currently employ approximately 651 employees (collectively, 

the “Employees”), including approximately 106 salaried Employees and approximately 

545 hourly Employees. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors made the difficult decision to lay 

off approximately 130 Le Tote Employees and approximately 980 Lord & Taylor Employees due 

to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Debtors furloughed a significant number of additional 

Employees, recalling such Employees throughout the incremental reopening of the Stores.

Digital Service Expenses.

30. As an internet based “digitally native” brand, the Debtors incur significant digital 

expenses on account of the Le Tote rental subscription service and, now, the Lord & Taylor 

e-commerce website. Services related to these two e-commerce platforms include information 

technology, marketing, photo studio, creative, site merchandising, labor and fulfillment, shipping, 

and credit card processing. Under normal volumes, the Debtors would expect to spend 

approximately $5 million per month on account of expenses relating to the Le Tote and 

Lord & Taylor digital platforms. Many of these services are delivered pursuant to the TSA. 

Consequently, the costs of such services have been reduced in connection with the renegotiation 

of the TSA and as a result of reduced volume due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

II. Le Tote’s Prepetition Corporate and Capital Structure.

31. The Debtors’ corporate enterprise consists of Debtor entities Le Tote, Inc., 

French Tote LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“French Tote”), Le Tote, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company, Lord & Taylor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

(“L&T”), and LT Card Company LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“LT Card”), and 

non-Debtor entities, related to the operations of Le Tote China, Le Tote Venture Limited, an 

exempted company incorporated with limited liability in the Cayman Islands, Le Tote 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 63
15

(Hong Kong) Limited, a company incorporated in Hong Kong with registered number 2534318, 

and Le Tote (Shenzhen) Technology Limited, a company incorporated in the People’s Republic of 

China. A simplified illustration of the Company’s corporate structure is set forth below.3

32. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors have outstanding secured debt obligations in 

the aggregate principal amount of approximately $137.9 million under: (a) the ABL Credit 

Facility; (b) the Term Loan Credit Facility; and (c) a promissory note, dated as of 

November 8, 2019, issued to HBC Propco with a maturity of November 8, 2021 (the “Seller 

Note”). The Debtors’ aggregate secured debt obligations are depicted in the table below.

Secured Debt Agent Maturity

Commitment / 

Original Principal 

Amount

Outstanding Principal 

Amount

ABL Credit 

Facility

Wells Fargo, 

N.A. Nov. 8, 2024 $225 million $77.2 million

Term Loan Credit 

Facility TCG BDC, Inc. Nov. 8, 2024 $30 million $31.5 million

 3 A more detailed capital structure chart, attached hereto as Exhibit A, depicts the Debtors’ corporate structure, as 

well as the Debtors’ various debt obligations.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 63
16

Secured Debt Agent Maturity

Commitment / 

Original Principal 

Amount

Outstanding Principal 

Amount

Seller Note

HBC US 

Propco 

Holdings LLC

Nov. 8, 2021 $30.4 million $29.2 million

Total Secured Debt $137.9 million

A. The ABL Credit Facility.

33. The Debtors are party to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of 

November 8, 2019 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of 

January 9, 2020, and Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2020, and 

as further amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time prior to the 

Petition Date, the “ABL Credit Agreement”), by and among Le Tote, Inc., as lead borrower, 

French Tote, Le Tote, LLC and L&T, as additional borrowers, LT Card, as guarantor party thereto 

(collectively, the “Le Tote Loan Parties”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 

(“Wells Fargo”), in its capacity as administrative and collateral agent (the “ABL Agent”), and each 

of the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “ABL Lenders”). The ABL Credit Agreement

provides for commitments of $225 million under the ABL Credit Facility (subject to a borrowing 

base composed primarily of inventory and credit card receivables) with a maturity date of 

November 8, 2024.

34. The obligations under the ABL Credit Facility are secured by a first-priority lien in 

substantially all of the Le Tote Loan Parties’ assets, including, among other things, all accounts, 

equipment and fixtures, intellectual property, and goods and inventory. As of the Petition Date, in 

the aggregate, approximately $77.2 million remains outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility.

B. The Term Loan Credit Facility.

35. The Le Tote Loan Parties are also party to that certain Term Loan Agreement, dated 

as of November 8, 2019 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Term Loan Agreement, dated 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 16 of 63
17

as of January 9, 2020, and Amendment No. 2 to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of 

March 23, 2020, and as further amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time 

to time prior to the Petition Date, the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”), by and among the Le Tote 

Loan Parties, TCG BDC, Inc. (“Carlyle”), in its capacity as administrative agent and collateral 

agent (the “Term Agent”), and each of the lenders from time to time party thereto 

(the “Term Lenders”). The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for a $30 million Term Loan 

Credit Facility (subject to a borrowing base composed primarily of inventory and credit card 

receivables) with a maturity date of November 8, 2024.

36. The obligations under the Term Loan Credit Facility are secured by a 

second-priority lien in substantially all of the Le Tote Loan Parties’ assets, including, among other 

things, all accounts, equipment and fixtures, intellectual property, and goods and inventory. As of 

the Petition Date, in the aggregate, approximately $31.5 million remains outstanding under the 

Term Loan Credit Facility.

C. The Seller Note.

37. In addition to the ABL Credit Facility and Term Loan Credit Facility, Debtor 

Le Tote, Inc. issued the Seller Note, in aggregate principal amount of approximately $30 million, 

and an inventory note, in aggregate principal amount of approximately $27 million, to HBC 

Propco to partially finance the Acquisition and inventory in connection therewith. The inventory 

note was repaid in December 2019. The Seller Note bears 0% interest through November 8, 2021, 

and 12% per annum thereafter. The obligations under both notes are guaranteed by Debtors French 

Tote, L&T, LT Card, and Le Tote, LLC.

38. The obligation under the Seller Note are secured in favor of HBC Propco (in such 

capacity, the “Junior Creditor Representative”) by a third-priority lien in substantially all of the 

Le Tote Loan Parties’ assets, including, among other things, all accounts, equipment and fixtures, 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 17 of 63
18

intellectual property, and goods and inventory. As of the Petition Date, in the aggregate, 

approximately $29.2 million remains outstanding under the Seller Note.

D. The TSA Obligations.

39. To facilitate the integration of Lord & Taylor, Le Tote, HBC Holdings, and HBC

Propco entered into the TSA, which obligates HBC Holdings and HBC Propco to provide certain 

transition services to Le Tote. Pursuant to the terms of the TSA, HBC Propco is required to provide 

monthly invoices to the Debtors, and the Debtors are required to pay such invoices within 30 days 

of receipt. The TSA provides for a grace period of 15 business days, with respect to the payment 

of obligations thereunder. The Debtors’ obligations under the TSA are guaranteed by the Le Tote 

Loan Parties and are cross-securitized with the collateral that secures the Seller Note (such

obligations, collectively, the “Secured Acquisition Obligations”). In connection with the 

investigation being undertaken by the Restructuring Committee as described below, the Debtors 

are investigating certain claims and causes of action with respect to the Secured Acquisition 

Obligations and the Debtors reserve all their rights to bring in the future any such claims and/or 

causes of action. 

40. On March 23, 2020, the Debtors elected to enter the fifteen (15) business day grace 

period provided under the TSA, with respect to approximately $4 million of obligations due 

thereunder. After suspending payments, the Debtors commenced renegotiation of the TSA in 

earnest. Subsequently, on April 10, 2020, the Debtors, HBC Holdings, and HBC Propco executed 

the Term Sheet, which, among other things, reset existing obligations owing under the TSA to 

zero. 

E. The ABL Intercreditor Agreement.

41. The ABL Agent and Term Agent, as representatives of the ABL Lenders and Term 

Lenders, as applicable, are parties to that certain Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 18 of 63
19

November 8, 2019 (the “ABL Intercreditor Agreement”). The ABL Intercreditor Agreement 

governs certain of the respective rights and interests of the ABL Lenders and the Term Lenders 

relating to, among other things, their rights and their ability to exercise remedies in connection 

with an Event of Default (as defined in the ABL Intercreditor Agreement) and in the event of a 

bankruptcy filing, including related enforcement and turnover provisions. As detailed in the ABL 

Intercreditor Agreement, the ABL Lenders have priority over, and are senior in all respects, to the 

Term Lenders with respect to the Collateral (as defined therein).

42. Section 6.2 of the ABL Intercreditor Agreement provides that, in the event of a 

chapter 11 filing, if the ABL Lenders consent to the use of cash collateral or the Debtors’ obtaining 

of debtor in possession financing secured by any portion of the Collateral, then the Term Lenders 

agree not to raise any objection on the grounds of a failure to provide “adequate protection” for 

the liens in favor of the Term Lenders or request adequate protection (except as provided below), 

so long as the Term Lenders retain their liens on the Collateral with the same priority as existed 

before, the liens on the Collateral securing any such debtor in possession financing are senior to 

or pari with the liens on the Collateral securing the ABL Lenders, the size of the debtor in 

possession financing does not exceed the maximum size provided for in the ABL Intercreditor 

Agreement, and the debtor in possession financing does not require the Debtors to seek 

confirmation of a specific plan of reorganization. In addition, the same section of the ABL 

Intercreditor Agreement requires the ABL Lenders and the Term Lenders to subordinate the 

Prepetition Liens under any debtor in possession financing facility as well as any “carveout” for 

professional or United States Trustee fees, in each case, with respect to the Collateral. Section 6.04 

of the ABL Intercreditor Agreement also provides that if the ABL Lenders receive adequate 

protection with respect to the Collateral, then the Term Lenders shall have the right to seek their 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 19 of 63
20

own adequate protection; provided that such adequate protection is subordinate to any adequate 

protection provided to the ABL Lenders with respect to the Collateral.

F. The Seller Intercreditor Agreement.

43. The ABL Agent, the Term Agent (together with the ABL Agent, the “Senior

Agents”), as representatives of the ABL Lenders, Term Lenders, and the Junior Creditor 

Representative, as representative of HBC Propco, respectively, are parties to that certain Seller 

Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2019 (the “Seller Intercreditor Agreement”). 

The Seller Intercreditor Agreement governs certain of the respective rights and interests of the 

ABL Lenders and Term Lenders (collectively, the “Senior Creditors”) and HBC Propco

(the “Junior Creditor”) relating to, among other things, their rights and their ability to exercise 

remedies in connection with an Event of Default (as defined in the ABL Credit Agreement) and in 

the event of a bankruptcy filing, including related enforcement and turnover provisions. As 

detailed in the Seller Intercreditor Agreement, the Senior Creditors have priority over, and are 

senior to in all respects, to the Junior Creditor with respect to the Collateral (as defined in the Seller 

Intercreditor Agreement).

44. Section 5.2 of the Seller Intercreditor Agreement generally provides that, in the 

event of a chapter 11 filing, if the Senior Creditors consent to the use of cash collateral or the 

Debtors’ obtaining of debtor in possession financing, the Junior Creditor agrees not to raise any 

objection. Section 5.4 of the Seller Intercreditor Agreement provides that if the Senior Creditors 

receive adequate protection in the form of additional or replacement liens on the Collateral or 

additional or replacement collateral, then the Junior Creditor shall have the right to seek its own 

adequate protection; provided that such adequate protection is subordinate to any adequate 

protection provided to the Senior Creditors.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 20 of 63
21

III. Events Leading to These Chapter 11 Cases.

A. Challenging Operating Environment and Transition Obligations.

45. A confluence of factors contributed to the Debtors’ need to commence these 

chapter 11 cases. These include: (a) the general downturn in the retail industry and the shift away 

from shopping at brick-and-mortar stores, which has led to a decrease in sales; (b) a challenging 

commercial environment over the past several years brought on by increased competition from 

retailers like Walmart and Amazon; and (c) the enormous impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, 

which has forced retailers across the country to stomach the expense of brick-and-mortar assets 

which were rendered unusable for a prolonged period of time. Over time, these factors have 

tightened the Debtors’ liquidity and complicated their vendor relationships, culminating in a 

liquidity crisis by the end of March 2020, when the Debtors faced dwindling cash flows, 

inaccessible inventory, and the inability to access even incremental liquidity. The combination of 

the above factors precipitated these chapter 11 cases.

B. The COVID-19 Pandemic.

46. Demand for discretionary retail products has plummeted during the COVID-19 

pandemic as consumers prioritize—with good reason—their health and maintaining a source of 

income. In this environment, most discretionary retail products are an unnecessary luxury for most 

consumers. To combat the unprecedented global spread of COVID-19, the majority of states, and 

many foreign governments, have shuttered all “non-essential” businesses—stores that trade in 

discretionary (clothing, home furnishings, electronics, beauty) as opposed to life-preserving 

products (food, pharmacies, cleaning supplies). Mass merchandisers, such as Walmart, which sell 

food and household supplies in addition to traditional retail items, have been allowed to remain 

open—increasing the already extreme competition in the retail market. 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 21 of 63
22

47. In the wake of COVID-19, the Debtors placed all of their vendors (including the 

service providers under the TSA) on hold, laid off approximately 130 Le Tote Employees and 

approximately 980 Lord & Taylor Employees, furloughed a significant number of additional 

Employees, and temporarily closed all Lord & Taylor Stores. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors 

have reopened all but two of their Lord & Taylor locations. The Debtors have recalled certain 

furloughed Employees to operate the reopened Stores. COVID-19 has also caused a drop in 

subscriptions for Le Tote as the Company’s subscriber base has suffered from the wave of job 

losses gripping the country and the demand for apparel has diminished due to hundreds of millions 

of Americans being affected by stay-at-home orders. As a result of these and other factors, the 

Debtors’ revenue has declined precipitously from forecasts. 

IV. Prepetition Restructuring Efforts.

A. Efforts to Manage Liquidity.

48. In response to the liquidity shortfall, the Debtors engaged Berkeley Research 

Group, LLC (“BRG”) to act as their financial advisor, to assist in managing their cash flows in 

response to these unprecedented crises. BRG and the Debtors’ management analyzed the Debtors’ 

cash flows and prepared “mothball” forecasts to manage the Debtors’ liquidity despite a significant 

revenue decline. As noted above, the Debtors significantly reduced their cash burn by suspending

payments to vendors, furloughing Store employees, and initiating significant layoffs at their 

corporate office. On March 29, 2020, in connection with the Debtors’ restructuring efforts, I was 

appointed as Chief Restructuring Officer.

49. The Debtors also engaged in negotiations with the ABL Agent and the Term Agent 

to continue operating their business in their “mothball” period notwithstanding the existence of 

several defaults under the ABL Credit Agreement and the Term Loan Credit Agreement. On 

June 23, 2020, the Debtors entered into forbearance agreements (the “Forbearance Agreements”)

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 22 of 63
23

with each of the ABL Agent and the Term Agent whereby the respective agents agreed to forbear 

from exercising remedies based on these defaults. The Forbearance Agreements provided a bridge 

for the Debtors to reopen their Lord & Taylor locations in advance of the Petition Date, thereby 

enhancing the ability of the Debtors to maximize value for the benefit of all stakeholders. 

B. Appointment of Restructuring Committee.

50. In connection with their restructuring efforts, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) 

of Le Tote, acting on behalf of itself and the other Debtor entities, established a special committee

(the “Restructuring Committee”) of independent directors to explore, review, evaluate and 

negotiate strategic restructuring alternatives and, as approved and directed by the Board, 

implementing those strategic restructuring alternatives. To that end, on April 16, 2020, the Debtors 

established the Restructuring Committee and appointed two independent directors, 

Pamela B. Corrie and Matthew R. Kahn, to serve on the Restructuring Committee. Beginning in

April 2020, the Restructuring Committee met regularly with the Debtors and their advisors to 

evaluate the merits of proposed transactions. 

51. The Restructuring Committee is also conducting an independent investigation into 

certain potential claims and causes of action held by the Debtors’ Estates. The Restructuring 

Committee’s investigation is focused on weighing the merits of any claims against insiders or third 

parties, including those arising in connection with the Acquisition. To that end, Katten Muchin 

Rosenman LLP has been retained as independent counsel to the Restructuring Committee. In 

addition, the Restructuring Committee is investigating whether the releases by the Debtors 

provided for in the Plan are proper under the circumstances and are being given in exchange for 

adequate consideration. The investigation is ongoing, and the Debtors reserve all rights, in the 

reasonable exercise of their business judgment, to prosecute, settle, release, abandon, or otherwise 

resolve any potential colorable claims that are identified in connection with the investigation.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 23 of 63
24

C. Negotiations with HBC.

52. In response to liquidity pressures and increased costs under the TSA, the Debtors

undertook multiple efforts to reach a mutually agreeable re-negotiation of certain terms (including 

payment and economic terms) of the TSA or a temporary deferral of payment under the TSA to 

ensure the continued provision of essential services. On March 23, 2020, the Debtors elected to 

forego their payment obligations under the TSA and enter the 15 business day grace period 

thereunder. HBC Holdings and HBC Propco promptly issued a notice of non-payment indicating 

the TSA would be terminated on April 13, 2020, unless the Debtors cured the payment default. 

After suspending payments under the TSA, the Debtors and their advisors engaged in hard-fought 

negotiations with HBC and its affiliates in an effort to restructure the payment obligations under 

the TSA and limit go-forward services to only those services necessary in a post-COVID-19 world.

53. Consequently, on April 10, 2020, the Debtors, HBC Holdings, and HBC Propco

executed the Term Sheet, which withdrew the notice of non-payment and reset the balances owing 

under the TSA to zero. Pursuant to the Term Sheet, HBC Holdings and HBC Propco committed 

to provide the Debtors with services relating to the operation of the Debtors’ e-commerce 

platforms and certain financial and accounting functions, among others, through 

December 31, 2020 while agreeing to stop providing certain services that were no longer needed 

in light of the scaled-down nature of the Debtors’ enterprise. In consideration for such go-forward 

services, the Debtors agreed to pay HBC Holdings and HBC Propco approximately $550,000 per 

month, in advance, weekly variable payments, invoiced weekly in arrears, and weekly variable 

deposits, equal to 75% of such weekly variable payments as deposits against future invoices. 

Beginning on January 1, 2021, payments under the TSA will revert to the terms set forth in the 

TSA without giving effect to the modifications described in the Term Sheet. The Term Sheet 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 24 of 63
25

greatly reduced the size of the Debtors’ go-forward payments under the TSA and resolved a 

potential cross-default under the Debtors’ secured credit facilities.

D. Prepetition Marketing Efforts.

54. In April 2020, the Debtors retained Nfluence Partners (“Nfluence”) to commence 

a prepetition marketing process of the Debtors’ Le Tote business. Shortly thereafter, the Debtors, 

in the exercise of their business judgment, determined to market the Lord & Taylor business in 

parallel. With the assistance of Nfluence, the Debtors prepared a list of approximately 78 potential 

acquirers (including various financial sponsors and strategic buyers) that were considered likely 

participants in a sale process of both the Le Tote and Lord & Taylor business. The Debtors also 

identified 30 additional parties that were considered potential acquirers of solely the Le Tote 

business and 15 additional parties that were considered potential acquirers of solely the 

Lord & Taylor business. Following the initial outreach to the identified 128 parties, information 

was provided to these parties to gauge their interest prior to executing a non-disclosure agreement 

(“NDAs”). Of these 128 total parties, approximately 13 parties entered into confidentiality 

agreements with the Debtors. Several potential counterparties requested additional information 

and received access to a virtual data room and/or conducted in-person meetings with the Debtors’ 

management or telephonic diligence meetings with Nfluence. The Debtors are engaged in active 

dialogue with several potential bidders with respect to both Le Tote and Lord & Taylor and will 

continue this dialogue postpetition. The Debtors have filed a motion seeking approval of bidding 

procedures setting out the process pursuant to which parties can submit bids for the Debtors’ Le 

Tote and Lord &Store Closing Sales.

55. The current Store footprint is unsustainable in light of the Debtors’ strained 

liquidity. Contemporaneously with this declaration, the Debtors have filed a motion requesting 

authority to market Le Tote and Lord & Taylor pursuant to certain bidding procedures and a motion 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 25 of 63
26

requesting authority to implement customary Store closing procedures. The Debtors are 

committed to achieving the highest or otherwise best bid for Le Tote and/or Lord & Taylor by

marketing those assets pursuant to the bidding procedures, and, if necessary, conducting an auction 

for such assets as well as any additional assets of the Debtors. The Debtors anticipate that any 

Stores which a potential purchaser does not seek to acquire will be wound down through Store 

closing sales. As discussed above, the Debtors entered into the Consultant Agreement with the 

Consultant to conduct these Store closing sales. The Debtors evaluated other national liquidation 

firms before selecting the Consultant and believe that that the terms set forth in the Consultant 

Agreement, including a percentage fee based on the proceeds from asset dispositions, are the best 

alternative for the conduct of asset sales and Store closures. The Debtors believe that utilizing the 

skills and resources of the Consultant to effectively and efficiently conduct the sales and Store 

closings will maximize value for all stakeholders.

E. Chapter 11 Plan.

56. It is critical that the Debtors consummate a sale, liquidation, or other asset 

disposition as soon as possible to maximize recoveries to all stakeholders and reduce the 

administrative expense of these chapter 11 cases. The Debtors’ prepetition secured lenders support 

the marketing of Le Tote and Lord & Taylor and have conditioned the use of cash collateral on 

certain sale process milestones, including, among others, that the Court (a) enter an order 

approving the sale of Le Tote no later than October 5, 2020, and (b) unless the Debtors have not 

received one or more binding bids in form and substance satisfactory to the prepetition agents, 

approving the sale of Lord & Taylor no later than October 20, 2020. Accordingly, the Debtors 

have filed a Plan on the first day of these chapter 11 cases which will efficiently monetize their 

assets and utilize proceeds from asset sales, Store closing sales, and any other asset dispositions to 

pay their secured lenders in accordance with their respective priorities and distribute any remaining 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 26 of 63
27

value to general unsecured creditors. The Debtors intend to swiftly proceed with a fair and 

efficient process to preserve and maximize value for enterprise-wide stakeholders.

V. Evidentiary Support for First Day Motions.4

57. Contemporaneously herewith, the Debtors filed a number of “first day” motions

(the “First Day Motions”) and are seeking orders granting various forms of relief intended to 

stabilize the Debtors’ business operations and facilitate the efficient administration of these 

chapter 11 cases. The First Day Motions seek authority to, among other things, ensure sufficient 

liquidity to run the Debtors’ business, ensure the continuation of the Debtors’ cash management 

systems, and allow for other business operations without interruption. I believe that the relief 

requested in the First Day Motions is necessary to give the Debtors an opportunity to work towards 

successful chapter 11 cases that will benefit all of the Debtors stakeholders.

58. The First Day Motions request authority to pay certain prepetition claims. I

understand that Rule 6003 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure provides, in relevant part,

that the Court shall not consider motions to pay prepetition claims during the first twenty-one days

following the filing of a chapter 11 petition, “except to the extent relief is necessary to avoid

immediate and irreparable harm.” In light of this requirement, the Debtors have narrowly tailored

their requests for immediate authority to pay certain prepetition claims to those circumstances 

where the failure to pay such claims would cause immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtors 

and their estates. Other relief will be deferred for consideration at a later hearing.

59. I am familiar with the content and substance of the First Day Motions. The facts

stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and I

 4 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the respective 

First Day Motions.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 27 of 63
28

believe that the relief sought in each of the First Day Motions is necessary to enable the Debtors 

to operate in chapter 11 with minimal disruption to its business operations and constitutes a critical

element in successfully implementing a chapter 11 strategy. A description of the relief requested

and the facts supporting each of the First Day Motions is detailed in Exhibit B.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 28 of 63
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing 

statements are true correct.

Dated: August 2, 2020 /s/ Ed Kremer

Richmond, Virginia Name: Ed Kremer

Title: Chief Restructuring Officer

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 29 of 63
Exhibit A

Capital and Corporate Structure

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 30 of 63
 Corporate and Capital Structure Chart

Various Shareholde

Le Tote, Inc.

(DE)

French Tote LLC

(DE)

Lord & Taylor LLC

(DE)

LT Card Company LLC

(VA)

Le Tote, LLC

(DE)

Key

Domestic Entity

Foreign Entity

ABL Borrower

Term Loan BorrowerTerm Loan Guarantor

APA Seller Note Issuer

ABL Guarantor APA Seller Note Guarantor

Capital Structure

Term Loan Credit Agreement $31.5 MABL Credit Agreement $77.2 MAPA Seller Note $29.2 M

Total Secured Debt $137.9 M

ABL Credit Agreement

Amt. Oustanding: $77.2 M | Commitment Amt.: $225.0 MInt. Rate: ~1.75-2.65%General ProvisionsAgent: Wells Fargo, N.A. | Maturity: Nov. 8, 2024

Collateral: Substantially all assets

APA Seller Note

Amt. Outstanding: $29.2 M | Amt. Issued: ~$30.0 M

Int. Rate: 0% through Nov. 8, 2021, then 12%General ProvisionsPayee: HBC US Propco Holdings LLC | Maturity: Nov. 8, 2021Collateral: Substantially all assets

Term Loan Credit Agreement

Amt. Outstanding: $31.5 M | Commitment Amt.: $30.0 MInt. Rate: LIBOR + 6.75%General ProvisionsAgent: TCG BDC, Inc. | Maturity: Nov. 8, 2024Collateral: Substantially all assets

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 

Document Page 31 of 63
Exhibit B

Evidentiary Support for First Day Motions

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 32 of 63
Evidentiary Support for First Day Motions5

I. Debtors’ Motion Seeking Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the 

Debtors to Pay Prepetition Claims of (I) Critical Vendors, (II) 503(b)(9) Claimants, 

and (III) Lien Claimants, (B) Granting Administrative Expense Priority to All 

Undisputed Obligations on Account of Outstanding Orders, and (C) Granting 

Related Relief (the “All Vendor Motion”).

1. Pursuant to the All Vendor Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final 

orders: (a) authorizing, but not directing, the Debtors to pay prepetition amounts in the ordinary 

course owing on account of certain (i) Critical Vendors, (ii) 503(b)(9) Claimants, and (iii) Lien 

Claimants (each as defined below), in an aggregate interim amount not to exceed $2.2 million

(the “Interim Order Cap”) and on a final basis in the ordinary course of business; (b) authorizing, 

but not directing, the Debtors to honor outstanding obligations to the Critical Vendors, the 

503(b)(9) Claimants, and the Lien Claimants on a postpetition basis in the ordinary course of 

business and consistent with historical practice; (c) confirming administrative expense priority of 

Outstanding Orders (as defined below); and (d) granting related relief.

2. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors engage a limited number of 

providers for many of the critical products and services the Debtors depend upon to operate their 

businesses and service their customers. Without strong vendor relationships, the Debtors’ ability 

to weather the COVID-19 pandemic would be severely impacted.

A. Critical Vendors. 

3. It is essential to the success of the Debtors’ business that they are able to maintain 

the supply of the goods critical to the Debtors’ business operations from certain Service and Retail 

Vendors, Operating Providers, and Marketing Support Vendors (collectively, the “Critical 

 5 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the applicable First 

Day Motion.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 33 of 63
2

Vendors”). The Debtors are not able to easily switch suppliers or service providers on short notice 

and would face significant risks to their supply chain if prepetition amounts owed to their Critical 

Vendors (collectively, the “Critical Vendor Claims”) cannot be paid. 

4. Pursuant to the All Vendor Motion, the Debtors estimate that, as of the Petition 

Date, approximately $2.6 million is accrued and outstanding on account of Critical Vendor Claims, 

of which approximately $1.8 million may come due within the first 21 days after the Petition Date.

Service and Retail Vendors.

5. The Debtors rely on a variety of vendors to provide necessary goods and services 

that allow the Debtors to run their stores and online subscription rental service on a day-to-day 

basis (collectively, the “Service and Retail Vendors”). These goods and/or services include: 

(a) inventory and merchandise; (b) customer subscription management; (c) customer support 

software; (d) data center support, repair, and hardware and software management; (e) information 

technology and compliance support; and (f) other third-party services. Certain of the Service and 

Retail Vendors provide the Debtors with merchandise directly to the Debtors’ customers under 

dropshipping relationships with the Debtors. The Debtors rely on various Service and Retail 

Vendors to perform essential services related to their online subscription rental service, which 

remained operational throughout prolonged store closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Any delay or loss of critical supplies or services related to the operation of their stores or online 

subscription rental service could delay or reduce commercial sales and materially harm the 

Debtors’ businesses. 

6. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that the Service and Retail Vendors 

may hold claims in excess of $1.1 million that are not entitled to administrative or other priority 

status under section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, of which approximately $795,000 will 

become due and owing within 21 days after the Petition Date.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 34 of 63
3

Operating Providers.

7. The Debtors do business with certain suppliers of goods, services, and/or equipment 

that are vital to the Debtors’ day-to-day operations (collectively, the “Operating Providers”). 

Essential goods and/or services provided by such vendors include general supplies and packaging 

materials, maintenance, and support infrastructure for the Debtors’ facilities and personnel, among 

others. The Operating Providers provide goods and services that allow the Debtors to sell their 

merchandise to customers in an efficient manner and otherwise smoothly operate their businesses. 

If the Operating Providers cease to provide such goods or services, the Debtors could be unable to 

continue serving their customers, which would materially reduce revenues, to the detriment of all 

stakeholders. Without the Operating Providers, the Debtors cannot operate the type of store or 

subscription service that their customers have come to expect. Moreover, the Debtors do not 

believe that alternative providers are readily available to be substituted given the “real-time” nature 

of the Debtors’ operations. 

8. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that the Operating Providers may hold 

claims in excess of $1.7 million that are not entitled to administrative or other priority status under 

section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, of which approximately $1.1 million will become due 

and owing within 21 days after the Petition Date. 

Marketing Support Vendors.

9. The Debtors use certain vendors that provide critical marketing support products 

and services for their business operations (the “Marketing Support Vendors”). For example, these 

vendors provide essential services related to digital marketing campaigns, customer relationship 

management capabilities, and brand creative services. The Debtors rely on the Marketing Support 

Vendors to attract customers and drive sales. This infrastructure is essential to promote events and 

programs, build customer loyalty, and ultimately drive revenue for the benefit of the Debtors’ 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 35 of 63
4

estates and all stakeholders. If the Marketing Support Vendors refuse to provide services to the 

Debtors after the Petition Date on account of unpaid prepetition claims, the Debtors’ would be 

forced to onboard third-party vendors, to the extent they are even able to master the Debtors’ 

marketing and advertising systems. This process would result in interruptions to the Debtors’

customer interface that would require additional support in an untimely and cost-inefficient 

manner. At this critical time, there is a risk that the loss of the Marketing Support Vendors would 

have a significant negative impact on the Debtors’ operations and revenues to the detriment of all 

parties in interest. 

10. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that the Marketing Support Vendors

may hold claims in excess of $12,000 that are not entitled to administrative or other priority status 

under section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, of which approximately $5,000 will become due 

and owing within 21 days after the Petition Date. 

B. 503(b)(9) Claimants.

11. The Debtors may have received certain inventory, goods, and materials within the 

20-day period immediately preceding the Petition Date from various vendors (collectively, 

the “503(b)(9) Claimants”) which do not have long-term contracts with the Debtors. 

The 503(b)(9) Claimants may refuse to supply new orders without payment of their prepetition 

claims. Such refusal could negatively impact the Debtors’ estates. Prior to the Petition Date, the 

Debtors stopped accepting merchandise and inventory due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a 

result, the Debtors do not believe that there are any outstanding amounts owed to 503(b)(9) 

Claimants. Out of an abundance of caution, however, the Debtors request the authority, but not 

the direction, to pay any outstanding and undisputed claims on account of goods sold to the Debtors 

in the ordinary course of business which may have been received by the Debtors within the 20 days 

immediately preceding the Petition Date (each, a “503(b)(9) Claim”). The Debtors do not seek to 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 36 of 63
5

accelerate or modify existing payment terms with respect to the 503(b)(9) Claims. Rather, the 

Debtors will pay any such 503(b)(9) Claims as they come due in the ordinary course of business. 

The Debtors intend to pay prepetition 503(b)(9) Claims only where they believe, in their business 

judgment, that the benefits to their estates from making such payments will exceed the costs to 

their estates.

C. The Lien Claimants.

12. The Debtors’ supply chain and order fulfillment depends on the services provided 

by, among others, customs brokers, freight forwarders, shippers, common or contract carriers, 

consolidators, and third-party logistics systems providers (collectively, the “Shippers”) as well as

third-party employees at storage and distribution warehouses (the “Warehousemen”). Without the 

services of the entire supply chain functioning smoothly and efficiently, the Debtors would likely

not be able to timely procure merchandise, guarantee timely development of trend-reliant 

merchandise, and/or reliably deliver the merchandise to their customers, which would be 

detrimental to the value of the Debtors’ estates and cost the Debtors the ability to effectively 

compete with its competitors in the marketplace. Additionally, the Debtors employ various general 

contractors and vendors to assist with remodels and on-site construction and repairs at their 

corporate headquarters, warehouses, and retail stores (the “Non-Merchant Lienholders”).

13. A number of the Debtors’ merchandising providers supply inventory to the Debtors 

on consignment (the “Consignment Vendors” and together with the Warehousemen and Shippers 

and the Non-Merchant Lienholders, the “Lien Claimants”). To the extent that these Consignment 

Vendors have properly filed financing statements, their claims are likely secured by inventory in 

the Debtors’ possession, and may be superior to the liens of the Debtors’ prepetition lenders. To 

the extent the Consignment Vendors are not paid timely, they may stop providing inventory to the 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 37 of 63
6

Debtors at a time when one of the few sources of inventory available to the Debtors is through 

consignment arrangements or potentially seek to enforce their liens.

14. Collectively, the Debtors estimate that approximately $570,000 is due and owing 

to the Lien Claimants as of the Petition Date (the “Lien Claims”), of which approximately 

$300,000 may become due and owing within 21 days after the Petition Date.

D. Customary Trade Terms.

15. Subject to the Court’s approval, the Debtors intend to satisfy prepetition claims 

described herein only to the extent necessary to preserve their business. In order to avoid 

disruption of the Debtors’ operations, the Debtors seek authorization, but not direction, to 

condition payment, either in full or in part, of prepetition vendor claims upon each vendor’s 

agreement to continue—or recommencement of—supplying goods and services on terms that are 

acceptable to the Debtors in accordance with trade terms (including credit limits, discounts, 

pricing, timing of payments, availability, and other terms) consistent with the parties’ ordinary 

course practice or as otherwise agreed by the Debtors in their reasonable business judgment 

(the “Customary Trade Terms”). The Debtors reserve the right to require, at their discretion, that 

the Customary Trade Terms condition to payment be made in writing. 

16. In addition, the Debtors request that if any party accepts payment pursuant to the 

relief requested by this Motion and thereafter does not continue to provide goods or services on 

Customary Trade Terms, then: (a) any payment on account of a prepetition claim received by such 

party shall be deemed, in the Debtors’ sole discretion, an improper postpetition transfer and, 

therefore, immediately recoverable by the Debtors in cash upon written request by the Debtors; 

(b) upon recovery by the Debtors, any prepetition claim of such party shall be reinstated as if the 

payment had not been made; and (c) if there exists an outstanding postpetition balance due from 

the Debtors to such party, the Debtors may elect to recharacterize and apply any payment made 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 38 of 63
7

pursuant to the relief requested by the motion to such outstanding postpetition balance and such 

supplier or vendor will be required to repay to the Debtors such paid amounts that exceed the 

postpetition obligations then outstanding, without the right of any setoffs, claims, provisions for 

payment of any claims, or otherwise.

E. Outstanding Orders.

17. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors stopped ordering merchandise and inventory.

As a result of shipping delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic, however, the Debtors may have 

ordered merchandise or other goods for which delivery will not occur until after the Petition Date 

(the “Outstanding Orders”). As a result of the commencement of these chapter 11 cases, certain 

suppliers may be concerned that goods ordered prior to the Petition Date pursuant to the 

Outstanding Orders will render the suppliers—with respect to such goods—general unsecured 

creditors of the Debtors’ estates. The Debtors seek an order (a) granting administrative expense 

priority under section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to all undisputed obligations of the Debtors 

arising from the acceptance of goods subject to Outstanding Orders and (b) authorizing the Debtors 

to satisfy such obligations in the ordinary course of business.

18. I believe that the relief requested in the All Vendor Motion will allow the Debtors 

to preserve stakeholder value by paying the prepetition claims of certain counterparties that are 

critical to the Debtors’ business enterprise. I believe that the relief requested in the All Vendor 

Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, 

and will enable the Debtors to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on 

behalf of the Debtors, I respectfully submit that the Court should approve the All Vendor Motion. 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 39 of 63
8

II. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors 

to (I) Continue to Operate Their Cash Management System, (II) Honor Certain 

Prepetition Obligations Related Thereto, (III) Maintain Existing Business Forms, and 

(IV) Perform Intercompany Transactions, and (B) Granting Related Relief

(the “Cash Management Motion”).

19. The Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders: (a) authorizing the Debtors to 

(i) continue to operate their Cash Management System (as defined below), (ii) pay any prepetition 

or postpetition amounts outstanding on account of the Bank Fees and Armored Car Services Fees 

(iii) maintain existing Business Forms in the ordinary course of business, and (iv) continue to 

perform Intercompany Transactions (as such terms are defined below) consistent with historical 

practice; and (b) granting related relief.

20. The Debtors operate an intricate cash management system (the “Cash Management 

System”). The Debtors use their Cash Management System in the ordinary course to transfer and 

distribute funds and to facilitate cash monitoring, forecasting, and reporting. The Debtors’ treasury 

department maintains daily oversight of the Cash Management System and implements cash 

management controls for entering, processing, and releasing funds. Additionally, the Debtors’ 

corporate accounting, treasury, and internal audit departments regularly reconcile the Debtors’ 

books and records to ensure that all transfers are accounted for properly.

21. The Debtors’ Cash Management System facilitates the timely and efficient 

collection, management, and disbursement of funds used in the Debtors’ business. The Debtors 

estimate that cash collections for the Cash Management System average approximately 

$65 million per month, including store cash receipts, credit and debit card receipts, and website 

sales. Because of the nature of the Debtors’ business and the disruption to the business that would 

result if they were forced to close their existing bank accounts, it is critical that the Debtors’ Cash 

Management System remain in place on a postpetition basis.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 40 of 63
9

22. As of the Petition Date, the Cash Management System includes a total of 57 bank 

accounts (collectively, the “Bank Accounts”), which are held at two (2) different banks, Bank of 

America, N.A. and Silicon Valley Bank, N.A. (collectively, the “Cash Management Banks”). 

23. The Cash Management System is organized around the Master Account, which 

pools incoming funds from the Store Accounts as a result of cash sales at the Debtors’ brick and 

mortar locations, as well as various operating, deposit, and concentration. The Master Account, 

in turn, funds the Debtors’ various disbursement accounts. 

24. Pursuant to the respective credit agreements and other loan documents (including 

intercreditor and deposit account control agreements) governing the Debtors’ prepetition 

asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”) and the Debtors’ term loan credit facility 

(“Term Loan Facility”), substantially all of the cash held in the Bank Accounts is subject to 

properly-perfected security interests in favor of the ABL Agent and TCG BDG, Inc., solely in its 

capacity as administrative agent under the Term Loan Facility. On a daily basis, all cash amounts 

that remain in the Store Concentration Account and Credit Card Concentration Account and all 

other cash receipts and proceeds (with limited exceptions set forth in the ABL Loan) are swept by 

the ABL Agent to pay down balances of the ABL Loan.

25. Cash Collections. The Debtors maintain 38 Store Accounts for their 

Lord & Taylor store locations, into which all non-credit card store-level cash sales are deposited 

by the store manager on a daily basis. Under ordinary circumstances, each week, armored cars 

collect and transfer cash from each of the Debtors’ 38 store locations to a depository vault where 

the cash is counted and electronically deposited into the applicable store Bank Accounts. On 

average, approximately $400,000 - $700,000 in cash is in transit in the armored car services, 

depending on the season. Additionally, each store location maintains a certain level of cash on 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 41 of 63
10

hand in a vault to populate cash registers. Currently, the Debtors have approximately $1,000,000 

in vaults across the 38 store locations. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors are 

currently not transacting in cash. This cash will remain in the store location vaults until such time 

that the Debtors resume cash transactions.

26. Bank and Armored Car Fees. On a monthly basis the Debtors pay approximately 

$680,000 in service charges and other fees in connection with the maintenance of the Cash 

Management System (the “Bank Fees”). The Debtors paid approximately $4 million on account 

of Bank Fees in 2019. The Debtors estimate that they owe approximately $90,000 on account of 

Bank Fees as of the Petition Date and request authority to pay outstanding Bank Fees in the 

ordinary course of business, including on a on a postpetition basis, in order to ensure the 

uninterrupted operation of the Cash Management System.

27. In addition, the Debtors’ pay approximately $11,000 in monthly fees on account of 

the Armored Car Services (the “Armored Car Services Fees”). The Debtors paid approximately 

$22,000 on account of the Armored Car Services Fees in 2019. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors 

do not believe that they have any amounts outstanding on account of the Armored Car Services 

Fees. Although the Debtors do not currently utilize the Armored Car Services because they are 

currently only taking electronic payments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors anticipate 

they will need to utilize these services once it is safe to accept cash payments. Out of an abundance 

of caution, the Debtors request authority to pay any amounts outstanding on account of Armored 

Car Services Fees, including any prepetition amounts, in the ordinary course of business on a 

postpetition basis to ensure the uninterrupted operations of their store locations and the Cash 

Management System.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 42 of 63
11

28. Commercial Card Program. As part of the Cash Management System, the Debtors 

provide certain of their employees in their brick and mortar store locations with access to purchase 

cards issued by Bank of America (the “Purchase Cards”) to be utilized for approved purchases and 

business expenses (the “Commercial Card Program”). Each of the Debtors’ store locations 

maintains one or two Purchase Cards and certain employees have access to the Purchase Cards to 

purchase certain approved goods or services. The Purchase Cards are paid monthly. In order to 

maintain the Commercial Card Program, which is critical to the Debtors’ ability to maintain 

ordinary course operations at the store level, the Debtors request authority to continue utilizing 

and making payments on account of the Commercial Card Program in the ordinary course of 

business on a postpetition basis. 

29. Business Forms and Books and Records. As part of the Cash Management 

System, the Debtors utilize preprinted business forms in the ordinary course of business, including 

letterhead, purchase orders, invoices, and preprinted checks (the “Business Forms”). To minimize 

expenses to their estates and avoid confusion on the part of employees, customers, vendors, and 

suppliers during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases, the Debtors request that the Court 

authorize their continued use of all Business Forms in existence immediately before the Petition 

Date, without reference to the Debtors’ status as debtors in possession. If the Debtors exhaust their 

existing supply of checks during these chapter 11 cases, the Debtors will print or order checks with 

the designation “Debtor in Possession” and the corresponding bankruptcy case number.

30. Intercompany Transactions. The Debtors maintain business relationships and 

have entered into certain agreements with each other (the “Intercompany Transactions”) resulting 

in intercompany receivables and payables in the ordinary course of business (collectively, 

the “Intercompany Claims”). The Intercompany Transactions do not include the transfer of funds 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 43 of 63
12

through direct deposits, but instead include inventory transfers and other non-cash transfers 

between the Debtor entities. Accordingly, at any given time there may be Intercompany Claims 

owed by one Debtor to another Debtor. Such Intercompany Transactions are typically conducted 

pursuant to informal intercompany arrangements. The Debtors track all fund transfers through 

their accounting system and can ascertain, trace, and account for all Intercompany Transactions. 

As of the Petition Date, there are no Intercompany Claims between the Debtors and any non-debtor 

affiliates. If the Intercompany Transactions were to be discontinued, the Cash Management 

System and the Debtors’ operations would be unnecessarily disrupted to the detriment of the 

Debtors, their creditors, and other stakeholders.

31. I believe that the continuation of the Cash Management System, including with 

regard to the continued use of the Bank Accounts, payment of Bank Fees, continuation of the 

Corporate Card Program, maintenance of their existing Business Forms and Books and Records, 

and engagement in the Intercompany Transactions, is vital to the Debtors’ ability to operate 

effectively in these chapter 11 cases. Due to of the complexity of the Cash Management System 

and the interconnected-nature of the Debtors’ operations, any delay in granting the relief requested 

in the Cash Management Motion would severely disrupt the Debtors’ operations at this critical 

juncture, imperil the Debtors’ restructuring, and irreparably jeopardize the Debtors’ ability to 

maximize the value of their estates for the benefit of all stakeholders.

32. I believe that the relief requested in the Cash Management Motion is in the best 

interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the 

Debtors to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, 

I respectfully submit that the Cash Management Motion should be approved.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 44 of 63
13

III. Debtors’ Application for Entry of an Order Authorizing the Retention and 

Appointment of Stretto as Claims and Noticing Agent (the “Stretto 156(c) Retention 

Application”).

33. Pursuant to the Stretto 156(c) Retention Application, the Debtors seek entry of an 

order appointing Stretto6 as claims, noticing and solicitation agent (the “Claims, Noticing, and 

Solicitation Agent”) for the Debtors in their chapter 11 cases, effective as of the Petition Date. As 

the Claims, Noticing, and Solicitation Agent, Stretto would assume full responsibility for the 

distribution of notices and the maintenance, processing, and docketing of proofs of claim filed in 

the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases.

34. Based on my discussions with the Debtors’ advisors, I believe that the Debtors’ 

selection of Stretto to act as the Claims, Noticing, and Solicitation Agent is appropriate under the 

circumstances and in the best interest of the estates. Moreover, it is my understanding, based on 

all engagement proposals obtained and reviewed, that Stretto’s rates are competitive and 

comparable to the rates charged by its competitors for similar services.

35. The Debtors anticipate that there will be thousands of persons and entities to be 

noticed in these chapter 11 cases. In light of the number of parties in interest and the complexity 

of the Debtors’ business, the Debtors submit that the appointment of a claims and noticing agent 

is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates and their creditors because it will provide the most 

effective and efficient means of, and relieve the Debtors and/or the Clerk’s office of the 

administrative burden of, noticing and processing proofs of claim. Accordingly, it is my opinion 

that the Court should approve the Stretto 156(c) Retention Application.

 6 Stretto is the trade name of Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc., and its subsidiaries.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 45 of 63
14

IV. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (A) Extending Time to File Schedules and 

Statements of Financial Affairs, (B) Authorizing the Debtors to File a Consolidated 

List of Creditors in Lieu of Submitting a Separate Mailing Matrix For Each Debtor, 

(C) Authorizing the Debtors to File a Consolidated List of the Debtors’ Thirty Largest 

Unsecured Creditors, (D) Authorizing the Debtors to Redact Certain Personal 

Identification Information, and (E) Granting Related Relief (the “Creditor Matrix, 

SOFAs, and Schedules Motion”). 

36. Pursuant to the Creditor Matrix, SOFAs, and Schedules Motion, the Debtors seek 

entry of an order: (a) extending the deadline by which the Debtors must file their schedules of 

assets and liabilities, schedules of current income and expenditures, schedules of executory 

contracts and unexpired leases, and statements of financial affairs (collectively,

the “Schedules and Statements”) by 14 days, for a total of 28 days, from the Petition Date, without 

prejudice to the Debtors’ ability to request additional extensions for cause shown; (b) authorizing 

the Debtors to file a consolidated list of creditors in lieu of submitting a separate mailing matrix 

for each Debtor; (c) authorizing the Debtors to file a consolidated list of the Debtors’ 30 largest 

unsecured creditors in lieu of filing lists for each Debtor; (d) authorizing the Debtors to redact 

certain personal identification information; and (e) granting related relief.

37. Schedules and Statements Extension. To prepare the Schedules and Statements, 

the Debtors must compile information from books, records, and documents relating to the claims 

of thousands of creditors, as well as the Debtors’ many assets, contracts, and leases across stores 

located nationwide. This information is voluminous and located in numerous places throughout 

the Debtors’ organization. Collecting the necessary information requires an enormous expenditure 

of time and effort on the part of the Debtors, their employees, and their professional advisors in 

the near term—when these resources would be best used to stabilize the Debtors’ business 

operations.

38. Although the Debtors, with the assistance of their professional advisors, are 

working diligently and expeditiously to prepare the Schedules and Statements, the Debtors’ 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 46 of 63
15

resources are strained. Considering the amount of work entailed in completing the Schedules and 

Statements combined with the competing demands on the Debtors’ employees and professional 

advisors to assist in efforts to stabilize business operations during the initial postpetition period, 

the Debtors likely will not be able to properly and accurately complete the Schedules and 

Statements within the required time period. The Debtors therefore request that the Court extend 

the initial 14-day period for an additional 14 days, without prejudice to the Debtors’ right to request 

further extensions, for cause shown.

39. Consolidated Creditor Matrix. Although a list of creditors usually is filed on a 

debtor-by-debtor basis, in a complex chapter 11 bankruptcy case involving more than one debtor, 

the debtors may file a consolidated creditor matrix. Here, compiling separate top creditor lists for 

each individual Debtor would consume an excessive amount of the Debtors’ time and resources, 

and filing a consolidated list would more appropriately reflect the liabilities against the Debtors’ 

operations on an enterprise level.

40. Consolidated List of the 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors. The Debtors request 

authority to file a single, consolidated list of their 30 largest general unsecured creditors. This will 

help alleviate administrative burdens, costs, and the possibility of duplicative service, and will 

prevent the Debtors’ estates from incurring unnecessary costs associated with serving multiple 

notices to the parties listed on the Debtors’ voluminous creditor matrix.

41. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I respectfully submit that the Court should 

approve the Creditor Matrix, SOFAs, and Schedules Motion.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 47 of 63
16

V. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors 

to Maintain and Administer Their Existing Customer Programs and Honor Certain 

Prepetition Obligations Related Thereto And (B) Granting Related Relief 

(the “Customer Programs Motion”).

42. Pursuant to the Customer Programs Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and 

final orders (a) authorizing the Debtors to maintain and administer their customer-related programs 

(collectively, the “Customer Programs”) and honor certain prepetition obligations related thereto, 

and (b) granting related relief.

43. The Debtors have historically provided certain incentives, discounts, and 

accommodations to their customers to attract and maintain positive customer relationships in the 

ordinary course of business. On account of the Customer Programs, the Debtors may owe certain 

obligations to their customers as well as other third parties (collectively, 

the “Customer Obligations”) arising both before and after the Petition Date. The Customer 

Programs promote customer satisfaction and inure to the goodwill of the Debtors’ business and 

the value of their brand. These Customer Programs include the Loyalty Program, the Refund and 

Exchange Program, the Le Tote Subscription Program, and other customer programs described in 

the Customer Programs Motion.

44. I believe that continuing to administer the Customer Programs without interruption 

during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases is critical to preserve the value of the Debtors’ 

estates. Customers expect and rely on the Customer Programs and may not continue to support 

the Debtors’ business if the Customer Programs are discontinued. It is incontrovertible that

support from the Debtors’ customers and the communities in which they conduct business, is 

essential for go-forward operations. 

45. Further, any disruption in the Customer Programs would immediately and 

irreparably jeopardize the viability of the Debtors’ ongoing operations by upsetting the “business 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 48 of 63
17

as usual” message that is critical to the Debtors’ ability to maximize the value of their estates for 

the benefit of all stakeholders. I believe that the relief requested herein will pay dividends with 

respect to the long-term reorganization of the Debtors’ business, both in terms of profitability and 

the engendering of goodwill, especially at this critical time following the filing of these chapter 11 

cases.

46. I believe that the relief requested in the Customer Programs Motion is in the best 

interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the 

Debtors to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, 

I respectfully submit that the Customer Programs Motion should be approved.

VI. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors 

to Maintain, Renew, or Supplement Their Insurance Policies and Honor All 

Obligations in Respect Thereof, and (B) Granting Related Relief (the “Insurance 

Motion”).

47. Pursuant to the Insurance Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders

(a) authorizing the Debtors to maintain, renew, or supplement their insurance policies and honor 

all obligations in respect thereof, and (b) granting related relief. The requested relief includes 

paying all amounts arising in connection with the Insurance Policies, including Broker’s Fees and 

Insurance Deductibles (collectively, and including any related fees, the “Insurance Obligations”), 

whether due and payable before, on, or after the Petition Date.

48. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors maintain approximately 

24 insurance policies (collectively, the “Insurance Policies”) that are administered by various 

third-party insurance carriers (collectively, the “Insurance Carriers”). These Insurance Policies 

provide coverage for, among other things, the Debtors’ general liability, excess liability, D&O, 

property, and workers’ compensation policies. All of the Insurance Policies are essential to the 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 49 of 63
18

ongoing operation of the Debtors’ business. The aggregate annual premium for the Insurance 

Policies is approximately $8.1 million, plus applicable taxes and surcharges.

49. The Debtors do not believe that any Insurance Policies will need to be renewed in 

the 21 days after the Petition Date. The Debtors estimate that, as of the Petition Date, there are

approximately $766,000 in premiums due on account of the Insurance Policies. Accordingly, the 

Debtors seek authority to maintain, renew, and/or supplement their Insurance Policies and to 

continue honoring any amounts on account of the Insurance Obligations in the ordinary course of 

business to ensure uninterrupted coverage during the course of these chapter 11 cases.

50. Pursuant to certain of the Insurance Policies, the Debtors are required to pay various 

deductibles or retention amounts (the “Insurance Deductibles”), depending upon the type of claim 

and Insurance Policy involved. Additionally, under some Insurance Policies, the Debtors’ 

third-party administrator may pay claimants directly and then invoice the Debtors for any 

applicable Insurance Deductible. In such situations, the Insurance Carriers may have prepetition 

claims against the Debtors. If the Debtors fail to make any Insurance Deductible payments, the 

Debtors could be in jeopardy of losing the underlying Insurance Policy, being in violation of state 

laws, and/or having certain letters of credit or bonds drawn, each of which would be detrimental 

to the Debtors’ business and a potential hardship on their employees.

51. The Debtors obtain their Insurance Policies through USI Financing (“USI” or 

the “Insurance Broker”). The Insurance Broker assists the Debtors in obtaining comprehensive 

insurance coverage for their operations in a cost-effective manner, manages renewal data, markets 

the Insurance Policies, handles all interactions with Insurance Carriers (including negotiating 

policy terms, provisions, and premiums), and provides ongoing support throughout the applicable 

policy periods. As of 2020, the Debtors pay USI approximately $18,000 per month (the “USI 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 50 of 63
19

Monthly Payment”) for costs related to the Insurance Policies, with all other brokerage fees having 

been paid up front. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors believe that they owe the Insurance Broker 

the USI Monthly Payment (the “Brokers’ Fees”), but the Debtors do not believe that they owe the 

Third-Party Administrator any fees (the “Administrator Fees” and together with the Brokers’ Fees, 

collectively, the “Fees”). 

52. I believe that continuation and renewal of the Insurance Policies, and entry into new 

Insurance Policies, as needed, is essential to the preservation of the value of the Debtors’ business 

and operations. Moreover, in many instances, insurance coverage is required by the regulations, 

laws, and contracts that govern the Debtors’ commercial activities, including the U.S. Trustee’s 

requirements that a debtor maintain adequate insurance coverage given the circumstances of its 

chapter 11 case. Accordingly, the Debtors request authority to maintain their existing Insurance 

Policies, pay prepetition obligations related thereto, and enter into new Insurance Policies in the 

ordinary course of business. 

53. I believe that failure to receive the requested relief in the Insurance Motion at the 

outset of these chapter 11 cases would expose the Debtors to direct liability for payment of claims 

otherwise covered by the Insurance Policies, distract the Debtors from the vital task of stabilizing 

their business through this process, and disrupt the Debtors’ operations at this important juncture. 

The relief requested in the Insurance Motion is necessary for the Debtors to operate their business

in the ordinary course and preserve the ongoing value of the Debtors’ operations and maximize 

the value of their estates for the benefit of all stakeholders. 

54. I believe that the relief requested in the Insurance Motion is in the best interests of 

the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the Debtors to 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 51 of 63
20

continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I 

respectfully submit that the Insurance Motion should be approved.

VII. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (A) Directing Joint Administration of Chapter 

11 Cases and (B) Granting Related Relief (the “Joint Administration Motion”).

55. Pursuant to the Joint Administration Motion, the Debtors request entry of an order 

(a) directing procedural consolidation and joint administration of these chapter 11 cases and 

(b) granting related relief. Given the integrated nature of the Debtors’ operations, joint 

administration of these chapter 11 cases will provide significant administrative convenience 

without harming the substantive rights of any party in interest. Many of the motions, hearings, 

and orders in these chapter 11 cases will affect each Debtor entity. The entry of an order directing 

joint administration of these chapter 11 cases will reduce fees and costs by avoiding duplicative 

filings and objections. Joint administration also will allow the U.S. Trustee and all parties in 

interest to monitor these chapter 11 cases with greater ease and efficiency. 

56. I believe that the relief requested in the Joint Administration Motion is in the best 

interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the 

Debtors to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that 

the Joint Administration Motion should be approved.

VIII. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Approving Notification 

and Hearing Procedures for Certain Transfers of and Declarations of Worthlessness 

with Respect to Common Stock and (B) Granting Related Relief (the “NOL Motion”).

57. Pursuant to the NOL Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders

(a) approving certain notification and hearing procedures (the “Procedures”) related to certain 

transfers of, or declarations of worthlessness with respect to, Le Tote, Inc.’s common stock or any 

Beneficial Ownership (as defined under the applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code)

therein (any such record or Beneficial Ownership of common stock, the “Common Stock”), 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 52 of 63
21

(b) directing that any purchase, sale, other transfer of, or declaration of worthlessness with respect 

to Common Stock in violation of the Procedures shall be null and void ab initio, and (c) granting 

related relief. 

58. As of the end of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020, the Debtors estimate they 

had NOLs in the amount of approximately $128 million and approximately $6.6 million of 163(j) 

Carryforwards.7 They further estimate that they may generate additional NOLs, disallowed 

interest carryforwards, or other tax attributes in the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years (NOLs, together 

with certain other tax attributes, the “Tax Attributes”).

59. I believe that implementation of the Procedures is necessary and appropriate to 

preserve the value of the Tax Attributes for the benefit of the Debtors’ estates. The Tax Attributes 

may provide the potential for material future tax savings (including in post-emergence years) or 

other potential tax structuring opportunities in these chapter 11 cases. In addition, the Debtors 

may utilize such Tax Attributes to offset any taxable income generated by transactions 

consummated during these chapter 11 cases. The termination or limitation of the Tax Attributes 

could be materially detrimental to all parties in interest. 

60. I believe that the relief requested in the NOL Motion is in the best interests of the 

Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the Debtors to 

continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I 

respectfully submit that the NOL Motion should be approved.

 7 Prior to February 2, 2020, the Debtors utilized a calendar fiscal year. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors utilize 

a non-calendar fiscal year, as is common for many retailers, which began on February 2, 2020. These attribute 

estimates are based on the Debtors’ pretax book losses for the 2019 fiscal year and the period from January 1, 

2020 through February 1, 2020. The attribute estimates herein remain subject to change until the tax returns for 

the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and the short fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 are filed.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 53 of 63
22

IX. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Payment 

of Certain Prepetition and Postpetition Taxes and Fees and (B) Granting Related 

Relief (the “Taxes Motion”).

61. Pursuant to the Taxes Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders: 

(a) authorizing, but not directing, the Debtors, to remit and pay Taxes and Fees (as defined in 

below) without regard to whether such obligations accrued or arose before or after the Petition 

Date, including those obligations subsequently determined upon audit or otherwise to be owed for 

periods prior to the Petition Date; and (b) granting related relief.

62. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors collect, withhold, and incur sales, 

use, withholding, income, franchise, property, and import related taxes and charges, as well as 

other business and regulatory fees (collectively, the “Taxes and Fees”).8 The Debtors remit the 

Taxes and Fees to various federal, state, provincial, and local governments, including taxing and 

licensing authorities (collectively, the “Authorities”). Taxes and Fees are remitted and paid by the 

Debtors through checks and electronic funds transfers that are processed through their banks and 

other financial institutions. The Debtors estimate that approximately $8.0 million in Taxes and 

Fees are outstanding as of the Petition Date, in addition to other amounts that will become due and 

owing to the Authorities after the Petition Date in the ordinary course.

63. The Debtors believe that any failure to pay the Taxes and Fees could materially 

disrupt the Debtors’ business operations in several ways, including that: (a) the Authorities may 

initiate audits of the Debtors, which would unnecessarily divert the Debtors’ attention from the 

restructuring process; (b) the Authorities may attempt to suspend the Debtors’ operations, file 

liens, seek to lift the automatic stay, and pursue other remedies that would harm the estates; and 

 8 By the Taxes Motion, the Debtors do not seek the authority to collect and remit state, provincial, and federal 

employee-related taxes and withholdings. Such relief is instead requested in the Wages Motion.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 54 of 63
23

(c) certain of the Debtors’ directors and officers could be subject to claims of personal liability, 

which would likely distract them from their duties related to the Debtors’ restructuring. Moreover, 

unpaid Taxes and Fees may result in penalties, the accrual of interest, or both. Lastly, the Debtors 

collect and hold certain outstanding tax liabilities in trust for the benefit of the applicable 

Authorities, and such funds may not constitute property of the Debtors’ estates.

64. I believe that the relief requested in the Taxes Motion is in the best interests of the 

Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the Debtors to 

continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I 

respectfully submit that the Taxes Motion should be approved.

X. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Approving the Debtors’ 

Proposed Adequate Assurance of Payment for Future Utility Services, 

(B) Prohibiting Utility Companies From Altering, Refusing, or Discontinuing 

Services, (C) Approving the Debtors’ Proposed Procedures for Resolving Additional 

Assurance Requests, and (D) Granting Related Relief (the “Utilities Motion”).

65. Pursuant to the Utilities Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders: 

(a) approving the Debtors’ Proposed Adequate Assurance of payment for future utility services; 

(b) prohibiting Utility Companies from altering, refusing, or discontinuing services; (c) approving 

the Debtors’ proposed procedures for resolving Adequate Assurance Requests (as such terms are 

defined in the Utilities Motion); and (d) granting related relief.

66. In connection with the operation of their business and management of their 

approximately 43 retail locations, distribution centers, and corporate offices, the Debtors obtain 

necessary electricity, telephone, internet, natural gas, water, waste management, and other similar 

services (collectively, the “Utility Services”) from a number of utility companies (collectively 

the “Utility Companies”).

67. On average, the Debtors pay approximately $764,369.02 each month for Utility 

Services, calculated as a historical average payment for the twelve-month period ended 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 55 of 63
24

March 30, 2020. The Debtors do not anticipate this monthly average will change materially during 

the initial thirty days following the commencement of these chapter 11 cases. The Debtors 

estimate that their cost for Utility Services during the next 30 days (not including any deposits to 

be paid or fees payable to Engie) will be approximately $764,396.02. 

68. To provide additional assurance of payment, the Debtors propose to deposit 

$382,184.51 into a segregated account (the “Adequate Assurance Deposit”), which represents an 

amount equal to approximately one-half of the Debtors’ average monthly cost of Utility Services, 

calculated based on the Debtors’ average utility expenses over the twelve-month period ending 

March 31, 2020, and excludes Utility Services billed directly to the Landlords.

69. Additionally, the Debtors seek approval of their proposed adequate assurance 

procedures, which set forth a streamlined process for Utility Providers to address potential 

concerns with respect to the Proposed Adequate Assurance, while allowing the Debtors to continue 

their operations uninterrupted. 

70. I believe that uninterrupted Utility Services are essential to the Debtors’ ongoing 

business operations and hence, the overall success of these chapter 11 cases. The Debtors’ retail

locations, distribution centers, and corporate offices require electricity, telecommunications, heat, 

water, waste management, and other Utility Services to operate. Should any Utility Company 

refuse or discontinue service, even for a brief period, the Debtors’ business operations may be 

severely disrupted, and such disruption would jeopardize the Debtors’ ability to manage their 

reorganization efforts. Accordingly, it is essential that the Utility Services continue uninterrupted 

during these chapter 11 cases. 

71. I believe that the relief requested in the Utilities Motion is in the best interests of 

the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the Debtors to 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 56 of 63
25

continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I 

respectfully submit that the Utilities Motion should be granted.

XI. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors 

to (I) Pay Prepetition Wages, Salaries, Other Compensation, and Reimbursable 

Expenses and (II) Continue Employee Benefits Programs, and (B) Granting Related 

Relief (the “Wages Motion”).

72. Pursuant to the Wages Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final orders: 

(a) authorizing the Debtors to (i) pay all prepetition wages, salaries, reimbursable expenses, and 

other obligations on account of the Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs (as defined in 

the Wages Motion) in the ordinary course of business and (ii) continue to administer the Employee 

Compensation and Benefits Programs in the ordinary course of business and (b) granting related 

relief.

73. The Debtors employ approximately 651 individuals, on a full-time basis or parttime basis (collectively, the “Employees”). Approximately 545 Employees are paid on an hourly 

basis, and approximately 106 Employees earn a salary.9 The Employees are not party to any 

collective bargaining agreements.

74. The Debtors’ Employees perform a wide variety of functions critical to the Debtors’ 

operations at the Debtors’ home office, distribution centers, and stores. Certain of these 

individuals are highly trained and have an essential working knowledge of the Debtors’ business 

that cannot be easily replaced. Additionally, certain of the Temporary Staff provide services 

necessary to continue the Debtors’ store-level operations, and without their continued utilization 

would require the Debtors to expend additional resources in this current, competitive labor market. 

 9 The included figures do not include seasonal staff, which the Debtors do not anticipate utilizing during these 

chapter 11 cases. 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 57 of 63
26

Without the continued, uninterrupted services of their Employees, the Debtors’ reorganization 

efforts will be severely hampered. 

75. The vast majority of Employees rely exclusively or primarily on the Employee 

Compensation and Benefits Programs to pay their daily living expenses and support themselves or 

their families. Thus, Employees will face significant financial consequences if the Debtors are not 

permitted to continue the Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs in the ordinary course 

of business. The Debtors seek to minimize the personal hardship the Employees and Temporary 

Staff would suffer if employee obligations are not paid when due or as expected. Consequently, 

the relief requested is necessary and appropriate.

76. The Debtors seek authority, but not direction, to pay the following aggregate

prepetition amounts on account of the Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs:

Employee-Related Obligations Interim 

Amount

Final Amount

Employee Compensation $250,000 $250,000

Payroll Processing Fees $45,000 $45,000

Withholding Obligations $550,000 $550,000

Reimbursable Expenses $25,000 $25,000

Employee Discount N/A N/A

Health Programs $709,000 $709,000

Life Insurance and Disability Programs $113,000 $113,000

Workers’ Compensation Programs $508,350 $508,350

401(k) Plan $50,000 $50,000

Paid and Unpaid Leave $116,52010 $116,52011

 10 The Debtors do not, as of the Petition Date, anticipate the need to pay any amounts due with respect to earned but 

unused Paid and Unpaid Leave during the Interim Period. However in the event of termination of an Employee 

during the Interim Period, prepetition earned but unused Paid and Unpaid Leave would become due within the 

Interim Period. Accordingly, the Debtors seek authorization, but not direction, to pay prepetition amounts in 

respect of earned but unused Paid and Unpaid Leave should they become due, by applicable law or otherwise, 

during the Interim Period.

11 The final amount with respect to Paid and Unpaid Leave reflects the aggregate liability of the Debtors if every 

Employee’s employment were terminated immediately, and all accrued and untaken Paid and Unpaid Leave were

paid in accordance with the Debtors’ practices and applicable law.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 58 of 63
27

Employee-Related Obligations Interim 

Amount

Final Amount

Non-Insider Employee Severance Program $0 $0

Postpetition Non-Employee Director Compensation $0 $0

Total $2,250,350 $2,250,350

77. The Debtors do not believe that amounts owed to any Employees on account of the 

Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs will exceed the statutory cap of $13,650 under 

sections 507(a)(4) and 507(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors 

do not seek authority to pay any amounts in excess of $13,650 per Employee pursuant to the 

Interim Order. 

78. The Employees provide the Debtors with services necessary to conduct the 

Debtors’ business, and the Debtors believe that absent the payment of the Employee Compensation 

and Benefits Programs owed to the Employees, the Debtors may experience Employee turnover 

and instability at this critical time in these chapter 11 cases. The Debtors believe that without these 

payments, the Employees may become demoralized and unproductive because of the potential 

significant financial strain and other hardships the Employees may face. Such Employees may 

then elect to seek alternative employment opportunities. Additionally, a significant portion of the 

value of the Debtors’ business is tied to their workforce, which cannot be replaced without 

significant efforts—which efforts may not be successful given the overhang of these 

chapter 11 cases. Enterprise value may be materially impaired to the detriment of all stakeholders 

in such a scenario. The Debtors therefore believe that payment of the prepetition obligations with 

respect to the Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs is a necessary and critical element 

of the Debtors’ efforts to preserve value and will give the Debtors the greatest likelihood of 

retention of their Employees as the Debtors seek to operate their business in these chapter 11 cases.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 59 of 63
28

79. Payment of the Employee Compensation and Benefits Programs is warranted under 

this authority and the facts of these chapter 11 cases. Employees will be exposed to significant 

financial difficulties if the Debtors are not permitted to honor obligations for unpaid Employee 

Compensation and Benefits Programs. Additionally, continuing ordinary course benefits will help 

maintain Employee morale and minimize the adverse effect of the commencement of these 

chapter 11 cases on the Debtors’ ongoing business operations.

80. For the foregoing reasons, I believe that the relief requested in the Wages Motion 

is in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and 

will enable the Debtors to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf 

of the Debtors, I respectfully submit that the Wages Motion should be granted.

XII. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors 

to Assume the Consulting Agreement, (B) Authorizing and Approving the Conduct 

of Store Closing Sales, With Such Sales to be Free and Clear of All Liens, Claims, and 

Encumbrances, (C) Authorizing and Approving the Store Closing Procedures, 

(D) Authorizing Customary Bonuses for Employees of Closing Stores and 

(E) Granting Related Relief (the “Store Closing Motion”).

81. Pursuant to the Store Closing Motion, the Debtors seek entry of interim and final 

orders: (a) authorizing the Debtors to assume that certain Consulting Agreement; (b) authorizing 

and approving the continuation or initiation of 38 store closings or similar themed sales at the 

stores listed on the schedules attached to the Interim Order and through the Debtors’ e-commerce 

platform (collectively, the “Sales”, “Closing Stores”, or “Store Closings”); (c) subject to entry of 

a final order, authorizing customary bonuses to non-insider Closing Store employees who remain 

employed for the duration of the store closing process (the “Store Closing Bonuses”); and 

(d) authorizing and approving the terms of the store closing procedures (the “Store Closing 

Procedures”).

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 60 of 63
29

82. Given the challenging commercial environment brought on by adverse 

macroeconomic trends, along with the devastating impact of COVID-19, the Debtors’ 

management team and advisors undertook an extensive performance analysis of all existing stores, 

evaluating, among other factors, historical and recent store profitability, historical and recent sales 

trends, occupancy costs, the geographic market in which each store is located, the mall or property

in which each store is located, the outcome of the third-party sale, and specific operational 

circumstances related to each store’s performance. In consultation with their prepetition lenders, 

the Debtors and their advisors ultimately determined in their business judgment to commence 

preparations for store closing sales at each of the 38 Stores.

83. As described herein, the Debtors are simultaneously conducting a comprehensive 

marketing process to execute a value-maximizing sale with regards to the Debtors’ most profitable 

Lord & Taylor locations. The Debtors are hopeful that there will be active bidding on their store 

assets at the Auction; however, they recognize it is unlikely that a retail buyer will purchase all of 

their 38 locations. Accordingly, the Debtors intend to conduct the Store Closings for each of their 

locations at this time. To the extent potential bidders express interest in purchasing one or more 

of the locations, the Debtors intend to discontinue the Store Closings at such locations. The 

Debtors believe this process will maximize value for creditors and stakeholders by providing 

flexibility for a potential winning bidder to purchase the Debtors’ most profitable stores.

84. The Debtors entered into the Consulting Agreement with the Consultant, which sets 

forth the terms pursuant to which the Consultant will operate the Store Closings for the Debtors. 

The Debtors evaluated other national liquidation firms before selecting the Consultant and believe 

that the terms set forth in the Consulting Agreement, including a percentage fee based on the 

proceeds from asset dispositions, are the best alternative for the conduct of asset sales and Store 

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 61 of 63
30

Closings. The Debtors believe that utilizing the skills and resources of the Consultant to effectively 

and efficiently conduct the Sales and Store Closings will maximize value for all stakeholders.

85. To effectuate the Store Closings, the Debtors seek approval of the streamlined 

procedures (i.e., the Store Closing Procedures) to maximize the value of the Store Closure Assets. 

The Debtors have determined, in the exercise of their business judgment and in consultation with 

their advisors, that the Store Closing Procedures will provide the best, most efficient, and most 

organized means of selling the Store Closure Assets to maximize the value of the Debtors’ estates.

86. Debtors are requesting the authority, but not the obligation, to pay Store Closing 

Bonuses (the “Store Closing Bonus Plan”) upon entry of the Final Order only to store-level 

non-insider employees and non-insider employees conducting the Sales, who remain in the employ 

of the Debtors during the Sales. Approximately 1600 non-insider employees will be eligible for 

the Store Closing Bonuses. If the Debtors were to close every Closing Store, the aggregate amount 

of Store Closing Bonuses paid will not be more than $2.6 million, assuming one hundred percent 

of the eligible employees remain employed through the duration of the Closing Sales at every 

Closing Store.

87. Providing such non-insider bonus benefits is critical to ensuring that key employees 

that will be affected by the reduction in the Debtors’ work force due to the Store Closings will 

continue to provide critical services to the Debtors during the ongoing Store Closing process. This 

will increase the likelihood of a successful Store Closing and encourage store management to 

provide uninterrupted leadership during this challenging period. Significantly, the Store Closing 

Bonus Plan ties payment incentives to a retail manager’s primary duty: to realize successful sales 

performance.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 62 of 63
31

88. I believe that the Store Closings and the Sales represent the most efficient and 

appropriate means of maximizing the value of the Store Closure Assets, while balancing the 

potentially competing concerns of landlords and other parties in interest. Delay in approving the 

continuance of the Store Closings would diminish the recovery tied to monetization of the Store 

Closure Assets for a number of reasons. Thus, the Debtors will realize an immediate benefit in 

terms of financial liquidity upon the sales of the Store Closure Assets and the termination of 

operations at the Closing Stores. Further, the swift and orderly authorization of the Sales will 

allow the Debtors to timely reject the applicable store leases, and, therefore, avoid the accrual of 

unnecessary administrative expenses for rent payment.

89. I believe that the relief requested in the Store Closing Motion is in the best interests 

of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest, and will enable the Debtors 

to continue to operate their business in chapter 11. Accordingly, on behalf of the Debtors, I 

respectfully submit that the Store Closing Motion should be approved.

Case 20-33332-KLP Doc 15 Filed 08/02/20 Entered 08/02/20 21:59:45 Desc Main

Document Page 63 of 63