alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1219 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 

EUROJUST 

Signed at Washington November 6, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
EUROJUST 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

Agreement signed at Washington November 6, 2006; 

 Entered into force December 19, 2006.
(No. 6225

#### J. P. Phillips, Inc., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January*9, 1973.

Angelo Ruggiero, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 5.1
 (DYKEMA LOGO)
    
    Dykema Gossett PLLC 
2723 South State Street
Suite 400
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104www.dykema.com
Tel: (734) 214-7660
Fax: (734) 214-7696
  
 Re:
    
    Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3
   (i)
    
    common stock, without par value per share (the Common Stock);(ii)
    
    preferred stock, without par value per share (the Preferred
Stock);(iii)
    
    senior debt securities (the Senior Debt Securities) to be
issued under the senior indenture (the Senior Indenture);(iv)
    
    subordinated debt securities (the Subordinated Debt
Securities and, together with the Senior Debt Securities, the Debt
Securities) to be issued under the subordinated indenture (the Subordinated
Indenture and, together with the Senior Indenture, the Indentures);(iv)
    
    warrants representing rights to purchase Common Stock,
Preferred Stock or Debt Securities (the Warrants); and(v)
    
    units representing an interest in two or more securities, which
may be or may not be separable from one another (the Units)




---



##### 








---



##### 



provided that




---



##### 



provided that
 provided that




---



##### 



provided
that
 provided that




---



##### 



D ykema G ossett pllc
 /s/ D ykema G ossett pllc
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,897

 0

 0

 2,355

 2,129

 1,710

 1,615

 1,636

 1,764

 2,060

 1,374

 1,373

 1,586

 1,574

 1,279

 1,549

 2,074

 2,202

 1,884

 1,808

 1,799

 2,297

 2,942

 2,792

 2,794

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 308

 0

 0

 344

 394

 369

 325

 263

 340

 347

 343

 349

 362

 355

 353

 359

 321

 310

 323

 350

 351

 361

 332

 331

 361

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 973

 0

 0

 813

 749

 731

 600

 641

 581

 620

 510

 488

 512

 532

 525

 607

 694

 648

 622

 678

 670

 771

 962

 770

 824

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 9,197

 8,648

 7,965

 7,129

 6,286

 6,412

 5,538

 4,755

 4,835

 4,830

 4,819

 4,813

 4,949

 5,088

 5,708

 6,218

 6,706

 7,218

 7,750

 7,302

 7,909

 8,603

 8,438

 8,311

 8,258

 8,328

 8,458

 8,839

 8,989

 9,303

 657

 618

 569

 509

 449

 458

 396

 340

 345

 345

 344

 344

 354

 363

 408

 444

 479

 516

 554

 522

 565

 615

 603

 594

 590

 595

 604

 631

 642

 665

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Case 19-13747-KHK Doc 1 Filed 11/14/19 Entered 11/14/19 15:01:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
Case 19-13747-KHK Doc 1 Filed 11/14/19 Entered 11/14/19 15:01:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
Case 19-13747-KHK Doc 1 Filed 11/14/19 Entered 11/14/19 15:01:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 19-13747-KHK Doc 1 Filed 11/14/19 Entered 11/14/19 15:01:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
### §93. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762

Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §318d, 42 Stat. 947, related to establishment of an office at the port of New York. See section 1331 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,917

 2,893

 3,491

 2,808

 2,433

 2,816

 2,631

 2,096

 1,579

 1,109

 1,125

 1,091

 1,597

 2,102

 2,758

 3,313

 4,071

 4,171

 4,300

 4,830

 4,582

 4,287

 3,865

 2,959

 2,451

 2,760

 2,807

 2,817

 3,282

 3,658

 3,793

 193

 206

 226

 320

 244

 284

 269

 272

 291

 247

 216

 206

 209

 188

 215

 244

 251

 264

 345

 373

 396

 348

 344

 344

 313

 321

 312

 313

 324

 347

 372

 498

 829

 960

 801

 777

 873

 765

 638

 613

 486

 364

 346

 407

 511

 590

 812

 1,021

 1,083

 1,257

 1,455

 1,371

 1,322

 1,171

 980

 853

 834

 734

 761

 835

 957

 1,066

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,499

 8,991

 9,468

 9,562

 9,655

 9,809

 9,736

 9,528

 9,431

 9,184

 8,914

 8,738

 8,754

 8,868

 8,960

 8,943

 9,004

 9,286

 9,766

 10,348

 10,954

 11,638

 12,196

 12,690

 13,179

 13,667

 13,994

 14,244

 14,489

 14,634

 14,679

 607

 642

 676

 683

 690

 701

 695

 681

 674

 656

 637

 624

 625

 633

 640

 639

 643

 663

 698

 739

 782

 831

 871

 906

 941

 976

 1,000

 1,017

 1,035

 1,045

 1,049

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 518

 403

 336

 418

 419

 405

 481

 510

 564

 483

 393

 375

 358

 324

 302

 357

 335

 557

 843

 1,915

 1,565

 1,509

 2,115

 2,645

 2,277

 1,494

 1,063

 866

 1,295

 1,617

 195

 183

 178

 178

 161

 164

 170

 182

 178

 163

 168

 170

 178

 179

 186

 187

 195

 186

 200

 203

 225

 252

 299

 276

 263

 272

 261

 228

 226

 222

 256

 227

 210

 229

 231

 227

 262

 295

 295

 246

 225

 219

 223

 220

 222

 219

 224

 244

 318

 494

 534

 511

 664

 785

 815

 583

 470

 372

 386

 398

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,439

 3,511

 3,571

 3,650

 3,703

 3,708

 3,721

 3,737

 3,725

 3,687

 3,611

 3,524

 3,429

 3,365

 3,331

 3,323

 3,337

 3,352

 3,439

 3,706

 3,978

 4,194

 4,563

 5,102

 5,692

 6,056

 6,303

 6,455

 6,619

 6,798

 246

 251

 255

 261

 265

 265

 266

 267

 266

 263

 258

 252

 245

 240

 238

 237

 238

 239

 246

 265

 284

 300

 326

 364

 407

 433

 450

 461

 473

 486

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.54 Transfer of concentrate. ( a ) *Concentrate unfit for beverage use.* Concentrate (including high-proof concentrate and concentrate treated as provided in paragraph (c) of this section) unfit for beverage use may be transferred for any purpose authorized by law.
( b ) *Concentrate fit for beverage use.* Concentrate fit for beverage use may be transferred only to a bonded wine cellar. If such concentrate is rendered unfit for beverage use, it may be transferred as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Rendering concentrate unfit for beverage use.* Concentrate may be rendered unfit for beverage use by reducing the alcohol content to not more than 15 percent alcohol by volume (if the reduction does not result in a concentrate of less than 100-fold), and adding to each gallon thereof, in a quantity sufficient to render the concentrate unfit for beverage use, the following: ( 1 ) Sucrose; or
( 2 ) Concentrated fruit juice, of at least 70 Brix, made from the same kind of fruit as the concentrate; or
( 3 ) Malic, citric, or tartaric acid.
( d ) *Record of transfer.* The proprietor shall record transfers of concentrate (including high-proof concentrate) on a record of transfer as required in §§ 18.62 or 18.63.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0098) [T.D. ATF-104, 47 FR 23921, June 2, 1982, as amended by T.D. ATF-381, 61 FR 37003, July 16, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.09

 1,198.06

 1,198.03

 1,198.01

 1,197.98

 1,197.95

 1,197.92

 1,197.91

 1,197.88

 1,197.86

 1,197.83

 1,197.80

 1,197.77

 1,197.74

 1,197.72

 1,197.68

 1,197.66

 1,197.64

 1,197.61

 1,197.58

 1,197.56

 1,197.52

 1,197.50

 1,197.47

 1,197.44

 1,197.41

 1,197.37

 1,197.34

 1,197.30

 1,197.26

 1,197.22

 48.05

 48.00

 47.95

 47.91

 47.86

 47.81

 47.76

 47.74

 47.69

 47.65

 47.60

 47.55

 47.50

 47.45

 47.41

 47.34

 47.31

 47.27

 47.22

 47.17

 47.13

 47.06

 47.03

 46.98

 46.93

 46.87

 46.80

 46.75

 46.68

 46.61

 46.54

STORAGE

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.02

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.07

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.07

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.07

-0.07

-0.07

CHANGE

1

4

4

13

5

2

-2

21

4

20

5

7

-2

2

12

-5

14

17

10

2

13

1

19

13

9

11

2

5

-6

-8

-7

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

OUTLET

 15

 18

 18

 18

 19

 15

 11

 17

 17

 24

 18

 20

 11

 15

 17

 17

 19

 22

 23

 15

 18

 23

 24

 26

 22

 24

 24

 18

 16

 14

 15

C.F.S.

 .27

 .31

 .32

 .32

 .34

 .27

 .20

 .30

 .30

 .42

 .32

 .35

 .19

 .26

 .30

 .30

 .33

 .39

 .40

 .27

 .32

 .40

 .42

 .46

 .39

 .42

 .43

 .32

 .28

 .25

 .27

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/19/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.56 186 403 0 573 10.12 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,560 369 799 0 1,137

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 799

 799

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2006 .00

 48.11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,199.56

 1,199.64

 1,199.71

 1,199.75

 1,199.77

 1,199.78

 1,199.79

 1,199.79

 1,199.79

 1,199.79

 1,199.77

 1,199.74

 1,199.74

 1,199.75

 1,199.76

 1,199.75

 1,199.75

 1,199.75

 1,199.75

 1,199.75

 1,199.74

 1,199.74

 1,199.74

 1,199.74

 1,199.73

 1,199.72

 1,199.71

 1,199.68

 1,199.66

 1,199.62

 1,199.58

 50.67

 50.82

 50.94

 51.02

 51.05

 51.07

 51.09

 51.09

 51.09

 51.09

 51.05

 51.00

 51.00

 51.02

 51.03

 51.02

 51.02

 51.02

 51.02

 51.02

 51.00

 51.00

 51.00

 51.00

 50.98

 50.96

 50.94

 50.89

 50.85

 50.78

 50.71

STORAGE

+0.16

+0.14

+0.13

+0.07

+0.04

+0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

-0.05

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.05

-0.04

-0.07

-0.07

CHANGE

88

84

86

73

64

65

65

60

65

59

30

15

36

46

52

30

34

36

41

41

22

37

34

31

21

8

7

-11

3

-10

-18

INFLOW

 0

 0

 10

 27

 36

 42

 47

 47

 47

 47

 36

 22

 22

 27

 31

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 22

 22

 22

 22

 18

 14

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 5

 10

 11

 8

 9

 13

 8

 12

 17

 11

 11

 19

 13

 9

 11

 11

 6

 8

 13

 13

 8

 14

 11

 8

 12

 2

 5

 15

 20

 26

 17

C.F.S.

 .09

 .17

 .19

 .14

 .15

 .22

 .14

 .20

 .29

 .18

 .18

 .32

 .22

 .15

 .18

 .18

 .11

 .14

 .22

 .22

 .13

 .24

 .19

 .13

 .21

 .03

 .08

 .25

 .34

 .44

 .29

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/31/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.20 1,194 31 706 356 6.02 .21

ACRE-FEET +200 2,368 61 1,400 706

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,400

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 1,461

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .21

JULY 1, 2017 8.00

 50.51

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 8.00
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5356 

To amend the America COMPETES Act to strengthen reporting requirements 

relating to deficiencies in Federal research infrastructure, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2019 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To amend the America COMPETES Act to strengthen reporting requirements relating to deficiencies in Federal 

research infrastructure, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Labs Mod5 ernization Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO FED7 ERAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1007(c)(1) of the America 

9 COMPETES Act (42 U.S.C. 6619(c)(1)) is amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5356 IH

1 inserting ‘‘and funding for research infrastructure’’ after 

2 ‘‘research infrastructure’’. 

3 (b) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 180 days and 

4 every 2 years thereafter, the Comptroller General shall 

5 submit to Congress a report that includes— 

6 (1) an assessment of the current state of Fed7 eral science facilities and related infrastructure, in8 cluding with respect to climate control systems, the 

9 functionality of equipment and the usage of such 

10 equipment, the quality of buildings in which such fa11 cilities are housed (including the resiliency of such 

12 buildings to changes in climate, weather, and nat13 ural surroundings), and the safety of the materials 

14 used in construction of facilities; 

15 (2) an identification of the facilities in most 

16 critical need of repair or renovation; 

17 (3) the estimated costs of completing such re18 pairs or renovations; and 

19 (4) an evaluation of whether facility occupancy 

20 is sufficient to meet agency demands. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### E. A. Fletcher v. Co-operative Publishing Company.

Filed May 3, 1899.

No. 8885.

1. Action by Corporation: Corporate Existence: Pleading. In an action by a corporation, if its name imports a corporation, it is not essential to aver in terms its corporate existence or to plead the act of incorporation.

2. -: •-: -. A general denial does not place in issue the pleaded existence of a corporation.

3. Account: Pleading. Section 129 of the Code of Civil Procedure, wherein it provides that an account may be pleaded by copy thereof, is permissive. The facts may be averred in any proper form.

4. Action on Account: Judgment eor'Plaintiee. The judgment *held*warranted and sustained by the evidence.

Error from the district court of Franklin county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*F. A. Fletcher*and *W. H. Ashhy,*for plaintiff in error.'

*U. Whitmore, contra.*

*512Harrison, C. J.

The defendant in error instituted this action before a justice of the peace of Franklin county to recover an amount alleged to be its due on an account of certain designated law books and publications sold and delivered to plaintiff in error and was given judgment, from which an appeal was perfected to the district court, where the publishing company was again successful and was accorded a judgment, of which the adverse party seeks a reversal in an error proceeding to this court.

It is argued that the petition was insufficient in its statement or plea of the corporate existence of the publishing company. The action was commenced in the corporate name of the company, and it was also stated that it was a corporation organized and incorporated under and by virtue of the laws of a designated state and doing business in the state of Nebraska. This was a sufficient plea of the corporate’ capacity of the company. *(Exchange Nat. Bank v. Capps,*32 Neb. 242; 5 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 70, 71.) The general denial did not. put in issue the corporate existence of the company. There was no special denial, and no proof of the fact was necessary. *(Herron v. Cole,*25 Neb. 692.) The pleading was of the sale and delivery of the books and publications, the statement being specific in relation to them. It gave the date of each, the book or publication, and the price. As a statement of the account it was not defective. The section of the Code to which counsel for plaintiff in error referred in argument, 129, that a plaintiff may set out in his petition a copy of the account on which suit is brought, is permissive merely. The facts may be stated in a different form. *(Collingwood v. Merchants Bank,*15 Neb. 118.) An examination of the evidence, in the light of the rules of law applicable to the facts developed, discloses and leads to the conclusion that the amount for which judgment was rendered was, after the deductions made in favor of plaintiff in error, none too large and *513that it was in all respects warranted and supported by the facts shown; hence it must be

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.24
 Capella Healthcare, Inc.  Two Corporate Centre, Suite 200  501 Corporate Centre Drive  Franklin, TN 37067-2662
  
 RE: Confirmation of Departure Terms
      Resignation
 Other Payments and Reimbursements Exhibit A




---



##### 



Mutual Releases
 By Executive We acknowledge and
agree that you are not releasing any claims arising after the date you sign this letter
agreement
 By Capella You acknowledge and agree that Capella is not releasing any claims arising
after the date that you sign this letter agreement
 Additional Covenants
 Nondisparagement
 2




---



##### 



No-Hire Covenant
 Executive Securities
    3




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Acknowledgments
     Confidentiality
 Indemnification, Defend and Hold Harmless
 Group Benefit Plans
 No Modification of Senior Management Agreement
 Parties in Interest
 Governing Law
 Notices
 4




---



##### 



If to Employer
or Parent Company:
    
    Capella Healthcare, Inc.
Capella Holdings, Inc.
Attention: Mr. Daniel Slipkovich
Two Corporate Centre, Suite 200
501 Corporate Centre Drive
Franklin, Tennessee 37067-2662
Facsimile: 
Telephone:With a copy to:
    
    Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell
& Berkowitz PC 
Attention: Kenneth Weber, Esq.
211 Commerce Street, Suite 800
Nashville, Tennessee 37201
Facsimile: (615) 726-0464
Telephone: (615) 726-7369If to Executive:
    
    Howard T. Wall, III
1507 Starlight Lane
Franklin, TN 37069
Telephone: (615) 972-8962With a copy to:
    
    Bone McAllester Norton PLLC
Attention: Trace Blankenship, Esq.
511 Union Street, Suite 1600
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
Facsimile: (615) 238-6301
Telephone: (615) 238-6331
  Counterparts
 5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Very truly yours,CAPELLA HEALTHCARE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. SlipkovichDaniel S. Slipkovich,
 Chairman and Chief
Executive OfficerCAPELLA HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Daniel S. SlipkovichDaniel S. Slipkovich,Chief Executive Officer
 ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:/s/ Howard T. Wall, IIIHoward T. Wall, III
                       DateSOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE STATED IN PARAGRAPH
4(b),
 REGIONALCARE HOSPITAL PARTNERS JOINS IN 

THIS LETTER AGREEMENT:RegionalCare Hospital Partners
 By:
    
    /s/ Martin S. RashMartin S. Rash,            Date Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
 7
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 18, 2016

p0928

Order 

Clerk

October 18, 2016

153951 & (65)

TIFFANY DENISE JONES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153951

COA: 328566 

Oakland CC: 2013-811123-DP

PHILLIP LAMAR PEAKE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to consolidate cases is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CorVu Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Justin M. MacIntosh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      Dated: February 14, 2005


                                 /s/ Justin M. MacIntosh
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Chief Executive Officer