alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5372 

To clarify that employees of safety net health plans are eligible for loan 

forgiveness under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. SMITH of Washington (for himself and Ms. SCHRIER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To clarify that employees of safety net health plans are 

eligible for loan forgiveness under the Public Service 

Loan Forgiveness Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety Net Health 

5 Plan Employee Student Loan Forgiveness Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC SERVICE LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR EM7 PLOYEES OF SAFETY NET HEALTH PLANS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 455(m)(3) of the Higher 

9 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)) is 

10 amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5372 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘at an 

2 organization that is a safety net health plan (as such 

3 term is defined in subparagraph (C)),’’ after 

4 ‘‘school-based services,’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) SAFETY NET HEALTH PLAN.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘safety 

9 net health plan’ means any entity with net 

10 premiums written for health insurance for 

11 United States health risks that is described 

12 in clause (ii) or (iii) of section 57.2(b)(2) 

13 of title 26, Code of Federal Regulations 

14 (as such section is in effect on October 1, 

15 2019). 

16 ‘‘(ii) OTHER TERMS DEFINED.—For 

17 the purposes of this subparagraph, the 

18 terms ‘net premiums written’ and ‘United 

19 States health risks’ have the meanings 

20 given such terms in section 57.2 of title 

21 26, Code of Federal Regulations (as such 

22 section is in effect on October 1, 2019).’’. 

23 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—In carrying 

24 out the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program under 

25 section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5372 IH

1 U.S.C. 1087e(m)), with respect to the calculation of the 

2 employment period of a borrower who is or was employed 

3 by a safety net health plan (as defined in such section, 

4 as amended by this Act), and the number of qualifying 

5 monthly payments made by such borrower for the pur6 poses of loan forgiveness under such section, the Secretary 

7 of Education shall include any such employment per8 formed, and any such monthly payments made, after the 

9 date of enactment of the Higher Education Opportunity 

10 Act of 2008 (Public Law 100–15). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,165.70

 1,165.72

 1,165.66

 1,165.61

 1,165.55

 1,165.50

 1,165.44

 1,165.38

 1,165.32

 1,165.26

 1,165.21

 1,165.15

 1,165.10

 1,165.04

 1,164.98

 1,164.90

 1,164.51

 1,164.05

 1,163.58

 1,163.11

 1,162.62

 1,162.12

 1,161.61

 1,161.10

 1,160.59

 1,160.02

 1,159.48

 1,158.93

 1,158.36

 1,157.77

 1,157.18

 10.15

 10.16

 10.12

 10.09

 10.05

 10.02

 9.98

 9.94

 9.90

 9.87

 9.83

 9.80

 9.77

 9.73

 9.69

 9.64

 9.40

 9.12

 8.84

 8.57

 8.29

 8.01

 7.73

 7.46

 7.19

 6.90

 6.63

 6.37

 6.10

 5.83

 5.57

STORAGE

-0.06

+0.01

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

-0.24

-0.28

-0.28

-0.27

-0.28

-0.28

-0.28

-0.27

-0.27

-0.29

-0.27

-0.27

-0.27

-0.27

-0.26

CHANGE

-4

32

4

9

14

8

6

5

3

3

6

4

7

4

6

3

5

2

1

3

-1

0

1

3

5

-5

6

7

4

4

8

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 120

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

 138

OUTLET

 5

 5

 4

 5

 4

 4

 5

 4

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 5

 8

 6

 5

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .23

 .22

 .21

 .23

 .18

 .21

 .23

 .21

 .11

 .11

 .11

 .14

 .16

 .17

 .24

 .38

 .29

 .24

 .20

 .15

 .18

 .18

 .22

 .14

 .11

 .18

 .20

 .19

 .13

 .14

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/30/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -4.66 153 2,372 9 111 5.80 .00

ACRE-FEET -4,660 303 4,705 18 220

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 18

OUTLET

TOTAL

 4,705

 4,723

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2020 .00

 10.20

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = .00
#### § 19.390 Container marking requirements.

A proprietor must mark packages and portable containers containing denatured spirits in accordance with the requirements of subpart S of this part.

(26 U.S.C. 5206)
§ 367.21 How does the Secretary use these funds to provide training and technical assistance? ( a ) The Secretary uses these funds to provide training and technical assistance, either directly or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements with State and public or non-profit agencies and organizations and institutions of higher education that have the capacity to provide technical assistance and training in the provision of independent living services for older individuals who are blind.
( b ) An entity receiving assistance in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall provide training and technical assistance to DSAs or other service providers to assist them in improving the operation and performance of programs and services for older individuals who are blind resulting in their enhanced independence and self-sufficiency.
(Authority: Section 751A(a) and (c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796j-1(a) and (c))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.40

 1,198.38

 1,198.35

 1,198.34

 1,198.36

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.31

 1,198.33

 1,198.44

 1,198.44

 1,198.42

 1,198.40

 1,198.38

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.31

 1,198.29

 1,198.29

 1,198.30

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.46

 48.60

 48.57

 48.52

 48.50

 48.53

 48.53

 48.52

 48.50

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.44

 48.48

 48.67

 48.67

 48.64

 48.60

 48.57

 48.53

 48.52

 48.50

 48.48

 48.44

 48.41

 48.41

 48.43

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.14

-0.04

-0.05

-0.02

+0.04

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.04

+0.20

+0.00

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

+0.00

+0.02

CHANGE

81

82

84

68

196

97

65

77

114

102

86

82

74

71

83

74

69

93

257

166

132

120

108

92

95

84

75

63

45

55

73

INFLOW

 72

 72

 72

 66

 123

 108

 86

 79

 93

 93

 86

 79

 72

 66

 66

 66

 60

 72

 155

 155

 139

 123

 108

 93

 86

 79

 72

 60

 48

 48

 54

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 8

 9

 11

 10

 0

 6

 5

 6

 2

 8

 8

 11

 10

 13

 16

 7

 17

 2

 3

 10

 10

 14

 17

 16

 17

 13

 11

 20

 14

 6

 9

C.F.S.

 .14

 .15

 .19

 .17

 .00

 .11

 .09

 .11

 .04

 .14

 .14

 .20

 .18

 .22

 .28

 .12

 .29

 .04

 .05

 .17

 .18

 .24

 .29

 .28

 .30

 .23

 .20

 .35

 .25

 .11

 .15

INCHES

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .94

 .05

 .00

 .28

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/26/2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.09 2,963 31 2,651 309 5.41 1.68

ACRE-FEET -90 5,877 61 5,258 613

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 5,258

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 5,319

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.68

JULY 1, 2004 24.14

 48.48
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 210

 203

 238

 249

 237

 227

 211

 195

 193

 206

 216

 228

 242

 252

 258

 265

 268

 276

 284

 285

 283

 281

 278

 287

 272

 265

 261

 239

 198

 161

 175

 193

 202

 210

 195

 189

 180

 183

 192

 206

 216

 226

 232

 249

 255

 260

 264

 268

 269

 271

 269

 269

 269

 260

 243

 227

 178

 176

 175

 186

 203

 222

 220

 207

 198

 185

 186

 197

 211

 222

 232

 242

 253

 258

 263

 268

 272

 273

 274

 274

 273

 275

 266

 254

 245

 217

 185

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,713

 3,632

 3,535

 3,450

 3,378

 3,298

 3,204

 3,108

 3,017

 2,942

 2,876

 2,830

 2,839

 2,886

 2,964

 3,036

 3,096

 3,142

 3,194

 3,260

 3,336

 3,425

 3,512

 3,590

 3,645

 3,677

 3,690

 3,665

 3,597

 265

 259

 253

 246

 241

 236

 229

 222

 216

 210

 205

 202

 203

 206

 212

 217

 221

 224

 228

 233

 238

 245

 251

 256

 260

 263

 264

 262

 257

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit  32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In connection with the quarterly report of  InterCare DX,  Inc.  (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB/A for  the  period  ending  March  31, 2004  as filed with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on    the   date  hereof  (the  "Report"),
we,  Anthony  C.  Dike, the  Chief Executive  Officer, certify, pursuant  to  18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of
2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of  Section  13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906,  has  been  provided to InterCare DX,
Inc.,  and  will  be  retained  by  InterCare  DX,  Inc.,  and  furnished to the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE:  February 25, 2005          By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO
### §4693. Final remedies

#### (a) In general

If a rapid response labor panel constituted in accordance with Annex 31–A of the USMCA determines with respect to a case that there has been a denial of rights within the meaning of such Annex, the Trade Representative may, in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees—

(1) direct the Secretary of the Treasury, until the date of the notification described in subsection (b) and in accordance with Annex 31–A of the USMCA—

(A) to—

(i) deny entry to goods, produced wholly or in part, from any covered facility involved in such case; or

(ii) allow for the release of goods, produced wholly or in part, from such covered facilities only upon payment of duties and any penalty; and

(B) to apply any duties or penalties to customs entries for which liquidation was suspended pursuant to section 4692 of this title; and

(2) apply other remedies that are appropriate and available under Annex 31–A of the USMCA, until the denial of rights with respect to the case has been remedied.

#### (b) Remediation notification

The Trade Representative shall promptly notify the Secretary when the denial of rights with respect to a case described in subsection (a) has been remedied.

(Pub. L. 116–113, title VII, §753, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 90.)
Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB#47897

Chandler Law Firm

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, Virginia 23226

804-353-1971

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re: Kandise Nadine Lucas, Case No. 20-33177-KRH

Debtor,

Chapter 13

Amanda Simons,

Plaintiff,

v. Adv. Pro No. 20-03143-KRH

Kandise Nadine Lucas,

Defendant.

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO

COMPLAINT FILED BY AMANDA SIMONS

NOW comes Defendant, Kandise Nadine Lucas, (“defendant”) by counsel, and 

files this Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on 

November 9, 2020 for four weeks from the date of December 14, 2020.

WHEREFORE, Kandise Nadine Lucas, defendant, hereby prays that this 

honorable court enter an order extending time to respond to the Complaint for four weeks 

from December 14, 2020, and for any other relief that is just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Kandise Nadine Lucas

By: /s/ Kimberly A. Chandler_____

Kimberly A. Chandler VSB 47897

 Counsel for Debtor

Case 20-03143-KRH Doc 4 Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 15:06:16 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Kimberly A. Chandler, VSB#47897

Chandler Law Firm

P.O. Box 17586

Richmond, Virginia 23226

804-353-1971

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I hereby certify that on December 4, 2020, a copy of the foregoing Motion to 

Extend Time to File Response was electronically transmitted and/or mailed to Carl M. 

Bates, the Chapter 13 Trustee, and to Todd M. Ritter, Esquire at Daniels, Williams, tuck 

& Ritter, Counsel for the Plaintiff.

/s/ Kimberly A. Chandler

Kimberly A. Chandler VSB 47897

Service List

Carl M. Bates,

Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

Todd M. Ritter, Esquire (VSB # 40020)

Daniels, Williams, Tuck & Ritter

11901 Iron Bridge Road

P.O. Box 3570

Chester, Virginia 23831

(804) 748-9803

(804) 796-2706 (fax)

tritter@danielswilliamstuckandritter.com

Case 20-03143-KRH Doc 4 Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 15:06:16 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 669.20 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?

The Secretary evaluates an application for an award on the basis of the criteria contained in §§ 669.21 and 669.22. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1123)

[70 FR 13377, Mar. 21, 2005]
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE


OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
undersigned Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 14, 2008
            /s/
      CHARLES R. BLUMCharles
      R. BlumChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      November 14, 2008
            /s/
      EUGENE E. EICHLEREugene
      E. EichlerInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.5

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

IMPCO Technologies, Inc.

3030 South Susan Street

Santa Ana, CA 92704

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-38649; 33-72008; 333-07035; 33-62889; 333-44085;
333-71544; 333-102069 and 333-118689) of IMPCO Technologies, Inc., of our report dated June 8, 2006, relating to the financial statements of IMPCO BRC de Mexico, S.A. de C.V which appears in this Form 10-K/A.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ BDO Hernández Marrón y Cía., S.C.
|BDO Hernández Marrón y Cía., S.C.    
|Mexico                               

June 23, 2006
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4373



# 

W ILLIAM K EITH D AFT ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.

Irene M. Keeley, District Judge.

(CR-99-25) Submitted: December 15, 2000 Decided: January 29, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Thomas G. Dyer, DYER LAW OFFICES, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: William Keith Daft was convicted by a jury of aiding and abetting the interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 2313 (1994). He appeals his conviction and sentence. Daft’s attorney on appeal has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleging that Daft’s former attorney did not provide effective assistance at trial but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Daft filed a pro se supplemental brief, also asserting that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel.Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are generally not cognizable on direct appeal. See United States v. King , 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. 1997). Rather, to allow for adequate development of the record, a defendant must bring his claim in a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). See id. ; United States v. Hoyle , 33 F.3d 415, 418 (4th Cir. 1994). An exception exists when the record conclusively establishes ineffective assistance. See King , 119 F.3d at 295. We find that the record in the instant case does not conclusively establish that Daft’s former counsel was ineffective. Therefore, we do not address this issue on direct appeal. Daft may assert his claim in a § 2255 habeas motion, if he so chooses. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw at this time. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel maymove in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2 U NITED S TATES v. D AFT
§ 363.50 What collaborative agreements must the State develop? ( a ) A designated State unit must enter into one or more written collaborative agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other appropriate mechanisms with other public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, and other available funding sources, including employers and other natural supports, as appropriate, to assist with the provision of supported employment services and extended services to individuals with the most significant disabilities in the State, including youth with the most significant disabilities, to enable them to achieve an employment outcome of supported employment in competitive integrated employment.
( b ) These agreements provide the mechanism for collaboration at the State level that is necessary to ensure the smooth transition from supported employment services to extended services, the transition of which is inherent to the definition of “supported employment” in § 363.1(b). The agreement may contain information regarding the— ( 1 ) Supported employment services to be provided, for a period not to exceed 24 months, by the designated State unit with funds received under this part;
( 2 ) Extended services to be provided to youth with the most significant disabilities, for a period not to exceed four years, by the designated State unit with the funds reserved under § 363.22 of this part;
( 3 ) Extended services to be provided by other public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, or other sources, including employers and other natural supports, following the provision of authorized supported employment services, or extended services as appropriate for youth with the most significant disabilities, under this part; and
( 4 ) Collaborative efforts that will be undertaken by all relevant entities to increase opportunities for competitive integrated employment in the State for individuals with the most significant disabilities, especially youth with the most significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), 602, and 606(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 705(39), 709(c), 795g, and 795k(b))