alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.459 Voluntary destruction. ( a ) *General.* A proprietor may voluntarily destroy spirits, denatured spirits, articles, or wines on bonded premises as provided in this section. There is no tax liability on spirits, denatured spirits, articles, or wines destroyed in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Wine notice.* A proprietor may destroy wine held on bonded premises only after the proprietor has filed a notice of intent to destroy with the appropriate TTB officer stating the kind and quantity of wine to be destroyed and the date and manner in which the wine is to be destroyed. The wine may be destroyed after the filing of the notice.
( c ) *Gauging.* A proprietor must gauge all spirits, denatured spirits, articles, or wines to be destroyed. The proprietor may establish the gauge of spirits in bottles on the basis of legible case markings and label information in accordance with § 19.286. The proprietor must individually count bottles in partial cases.
( d ) *Destruction off bonded premises.* If a proprietor intends to remove spirits, denatured spirits, articles, or wines from bonded premises in order to destroy them at a location off bonded premises, the proprietor must file a consent of surety to cover the removal. When the destruction takes place off plant premises, the proprietor must comply with applicable Federal, State, and local environmental laws and regulations.
( e ) *Record of destruction.* The proprietor must record the destruction of spirits, denatured spirits, articles, or wines as provided in § 19.617.
(26 U.S.C. 5008, 5370)
#### § 361.630 Can State merit staff still work in a one-stop center where the operator is not a governmental entity?

Yes. State merit staff can continue to perform functions and activities in the one-stop center. The Local WDB and one-stop operator must establish a system for management of merit staff in accordance with State policies and procedures. Continued use of State merit staff for the provision of Wagner-Peyser Act services or services from other programs with merit staffing requirements must be included in the competition for and final contract with the one-stop operator when Wagner-Peyser Act services or services from other programs with merit staffing requirements are being provided.
### §873. Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based upon title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §250 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §145, 35 Stat. 1114).

Only minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0715

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

TREVOR ROBERTS,

 Defendant and Appellant,

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant Trevor Roberts has filed an unopposed motion for extension 

of time to file the transcripts in this matter. No affidavit from the court reporter was filed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Appellant has until 

February 28, 2024, to file the transcripts. 

No further extensions will be granted unless an affidavit from the court reporter is 

filed.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2024

01/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0715
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 440.94

 442.71

 444.46

 446.18

 447.89

 449.15

 450.40

 451.64

 452.85

 454.05

 455.68

 457.28

 458.87

 460.44

 462.05

 463.60

 464.87

 466.04

 466.84

 467.98

 468.76

 469.50

 470.33

 471.14

 471.86

 472.92

 473.72

 474.66

 475.36

 476.07

 476.77

 883,841

 900,893

 917,860

 934,640

 951,423

 963,853

 976,238

 988,576

 1,000,664

 1,012,701

 1,029,128

 1,045,336

 1,061,526

 1,077,592

 1,094,150

 1,110,168

 1,123,348

 1,135,536

 1,143,894

 1,155,838

 1,164,033

 1,171,825

 1,180,585

 1,189,153

 1,196,787

 1,208,053

 1,216,578

 1,226,619

 1,234,114

 1,241,752

 1,249,284

 12,619

 8,392

 8,379

 8,353

 4,161

 4,165

 1,389

 4,469

 5,144

 4,110

 8,163

 4,063

 8,105

 8,075

 4,037

 7,999

 8,007

 8,037

 8,035

 7,929

 5,309

 5,254

 5,554

 6,204

 7,865

 8,067

 6,396

 6,097

 5,128

 7,692

 7,692

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL February 3, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2016 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 382,480 0 8,377 198,315

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 17,037

 17,052

 16,967

 16,780

 16,783

 12,430

 12,385

 12,338

 12,088

 12,037

 16,427

 16,208

 16,190

 16,066

 16,558

 16,018

 13,180

 12,188

 8,358

 11,944

 8,195

 7,792

 8,760

 8,568

 7,634

 11,266

 8,525

 10,041

 7,495

 7,638

 7,532

 328

 326

 319

 302

 314

 291

 283

 313

 295

 301

 285

 286

 278

 266

 255

 251

 262

 249

 245

 227

 252

 260

 237

 244

 257

 230

 231

 234

 236

 251

 269

12,087

7,886

7,847

7,767

3,595

3,132

946

4,058

4,656

3,608

7,620

3,450

7,501

7,472

3,633

7,384

7,445

7,475

7,522

7,339

6,134

11,306

7,038

5,710

7,365

7,566

6,016

5,660

4,685

7,305

7,107

ELEV STORAGE

 204,889

 271,310

 279,196

 287,043

 294,810

 298,405

 301,537

 302,483

 306,541

 311,197

 314,805

 322,425

 325,875

 333,376

 340,848

 344,481

 351,865

 359,310

 366,785

 374,307

 381,646

 387,780

 399,086

 406,124

 411,834

 419,199

 426,765

 432,781

 438,441

 443,126

 450,431

 457,538

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 259,223

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6,500

1,606

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8,106
§ 304.21 Allowable costs. In addition to the allowable costs established in the Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR 75.530 through 75.562, the following items are allowable expenditures by projects funded under the program: ( a ) Cost of attendance, as defined in Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1087 *ll* (HEA), including the following: ( 1 ) Tuition and fees.
( 2 ) An allowance for books, supplies, transportation, and miscellaneous personal expenses.
( 3 ) An allowance for room and board.
( b ) Stipends.
( c ) Travel in conjunction with training assignments.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1462(h))
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.133 Food product formulas. Formulas for nonbeverage food products on TTB Form 5154.1 may be approved if they are unfit for beverage purposes. Approval does not authorize manufacture or sale contrary to State law. Examples of food products that have been found to be unfit for beverage purposes are stated below: ( a ) *Sauces or syrups.* Sauces, or syrups consisting of sugar solutions and distilled spirits, in which the alcohol content is not more than 12 percent by volume and the sugar content is not less than 60 grams per 100 cubic centimeters.
( b ) *Brandied fruits.* Brandied fruits consisting of solidly packaged fruits, either whole or segmented, and distilled spirits products not exceeding the quantity and alcohol content necessary for flavoring and preserving. Generally, brandied fruits will be considered to have met these standards if the container is well filled, the alcohol in the liquid portion does not exceed 23 percent by volume, and the liquid portion does not exceed 45 percent of the volume of the container.
( c ) *Candies.* Candies with alcoholic fillings, if the fillings meet the standards prescribed for sauces and syrups by paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Other food products.* Food products such as mincemeat, plum pudding, and fruit cake, where only sufficient distilled spirits are used for flavoring and preserving; and ice cream and ices where only sufficient spirits are used for flavoring purposes. Also food adjuncts, such as preservatives, emulsifying agents, and food colorings, that are unfit for beverage purposes and are manufactured and used, or sold for use, in food.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ulticom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Shawn K. Osborne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark A. Kissman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   Shawn K. OsborneShawn K. OsbornePresident andChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerSeptember 13, 2010
    
 /s/ Mark A. KissmanMark A. KissmanSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerSeptember 13, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 19.170 Termination of bonds. Liability under operations bonds, withdrawal bonds, and unit bonds may be terminated for future withdrawals, future production, or future deposits as set forth below: ( a ) *On application by the surety.* A surety may terminate a bond by filing a notice as provided in § 19.171;
( b ) *By replacement of the bond.* A principal may terminate an existing bond by replacing it with a superseding bond approved by TTB;
( c ) *By discontinuing withdrawals.* A principal may terminate a withdrawal bond by notifying TTB that the principal has stopped making withdrawals covered by the bond, if the bond was filed solely as a withdrawal bond;
( d ) *By discontinuing the business.* A principal may terminate a bond by notifying TTB that the principal has discontinued business; and
( e ) *On application by an existing proprietor who becomes exempt from bond requirements.* If a proprietor has held a bond or bonds covering operations or withdrawals of distilled spirits for nonindustrial use and becomes exempt from those bond requirements as provided under § 19.151(d), the proprietor may apply to TTB to terminate the bond or bonds covering such operations or withdrawals. To apply, the proprietor must file an amendment to TTB F 5110.41, Registration of Distilled Spirits Plant, as provided in § 19.136. The proprietor must accurately state in the submission that the proprietor: ( 1 ) Will withdraw distilled spirits for deferred payment of tax as provided in § 19.235;
( 2 ) Reasonably expects to be liable for not more than $50,000 in taxes with respect to distilled spirits imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5001 and 7652 for the current calendar year (see definition of “Reasonably expects” in § 19.235(e)); and
( 3 ) Was liable for not more than $50,000 in such taxes in the preceding calendar year.
(26 U.S.C. 5173)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1121, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,385

 3,143

 2,313

 2,526

 2,243

 2,124

 1,876

 1,157

 1,057

 1,158

 1,551

 2,162

 3,451

 2,718

 3,425

 3,566

 3,683

 4,322

 4,804

 5,106

 3,721

 2,687

 3,026

 3,164

 3,063

 2,823

 2,266

 2,136

 2,130

 3,516

 3,470

 271

 287

 283

 249

 265

 266

 270

 270

 268

 259

 240

 238

 253

 290

 223

 279

 349

 376

 389

 479

 425

 419

 422

 327

 365

 381

 331

 307

 270

 428

 440

 748

 788

 655

 625

 519

 536

 494

 414

 444

 488

 486

 487

 637

 652

 786

 944

 1,140

 1,301

 1,647

 1,846

 1,316

 1,146

 1,110

 877

 779

 782

 741

 777

 895

 1,182

 1,156

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 10,729

 10,780

 10,433

 10,060

 9,755

 9,467

 9,060

 8,723

 8,633

 8,567

 8,477

 8,241

 8,081

 7,973

 8,011

 8,167

 8,652

 9,328

 10,456

 11,766

 12,588

 13,320

 13,986

 14,375

 14,668

 14,963

 15,067

 15,192

 15,301

 15,539

 15,555

 766

 770

 745

 719

 697

 676

 647

 623

 617

 612

 606

 589

 577

 570

 572

 583

 618

 666

 747

 840

 899

 951

 999

 1,027

 1,048

 1,069

 1,076

 1,085

 1,093

 1,110

 1,111

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO SECTION 1350 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Lotus Pacific, Inc (“Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Steve Davis,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 24, 2004

 
|   | */s/**Steve DAVIS*                                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Steve DAVIS                                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Lotus Pacific, Inc. and will be retainedby Lotus Pacific, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.137 Formulas disapproved for drawback.

A formula may be disapproved for drawback either because it does not prescribe appropriate ingredients in sufficient quantities to make the product unfit for beverage use, or because the product is neither a medicine, a medicinal preparation, a food product, a flavor, a flavoring extract, nor a perfume. The formula for a disapproved product may be used as an intermediate product formula under § 17.126. No drawback will be allowed on distilled spirits used in a disapproved product, unless that product is later used in the manufacture of an approved nonbeverage product. In the case of a product that is disapproved because it is fit for beverage use, any further use or disposition of such a product, other than as an intermediate product in accordance with this part, subjects the manufacturer to the qualification requirements of parts 1 and 19 of this chapter.

[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. TTB-91, 76 FR 5477, Feb. 1, 2011]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,106

 1,073

 1,049

 1,028

 1,045

 1,131

 1,148

 1,175

 1,169

 1,148

 1,113

 1,092

 1,063

 1,033

 1,018

 1,001

 976

 945

 894

 876

 859

 847

 809

 783

 748

 717

 698

 676

 666

 662

 631

 1,037

 1,025

 1,003

 973

 962

 956

 934

 945

 940

 940

 940

 941

 953

 961

 952

 913

 903

 873

 846

 821

 796

 785

 759

 736

 694

 673

 658

 642

 629

 605

 578

 1,076

 1,048

 1,027

 1,010

 1,013

 1,021

 1,040

 1,041

 1,042

 1,040

 1,028

 1,022

 1,024

 1,003

 982

 954

 937

 906

 876

 850

 839

 825

 793

 760

 723

 696

 680

 660

 648

 633

 605

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 17, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
### §101. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 643

Section, act Sept. 8, 1916, ch. 463, §707, 39 Stat. 797, related to cooperation by the Commission with other agencies. See section 1334 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

t1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143594 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143594 

 COA: 293773 

Kent CC: 08-011265-FC 

SID TERRELL JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Timothy E. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 11, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ TIMOTHY
      E. BIXBYName:
                    Timothy
      E. BixbyTitle:
                    President
      and Chief Financial
Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
### §1024. Purchase or receipt of military, naval, or veteran's facilities property

Whoever purchases, or receives in pledge from any person any arms, equipment, ammunition, clothing, military stores, or other property furnished by the United States under a clothing allowance or otherwise, to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States or of the National Guard or Naval Militia, or to any person accompanying, serving, or retained with the land or naval forces and subject to military or naval law, or to any former member of such Armed Forces at or by any hospital, home, or facility maintained by the United States, having knowledge or reason to believe that the property has been taken from the possession of or furnished by the United States under such allowance, or otherwise, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §86 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §35, 35 Stat. 1095; Oct. 23, 1918, ch. 194, 40 Stat. 1015; June 18, 1934, ch. 587, 48 Stat. 996; Apr. 4, 1938, ch. 69, 52 Stat. 197; Apr. 30, 1940, ch. 164, 54 Stat. 171).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500".
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VENANCIO CORTEZ, AKA Venancio

Cortes-Cortes,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 15-71042

Agency No. A205-147-507

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Venancio Cortez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) removal order denying his request for a continuance. Our jurisdiction

is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

FILED

JUN 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
continuance and review de novo questions of law. Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009,

1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate Cortez’s due process right

to counsel in denying Cortez’s request for a second continuance for failure to show

good cause, or in granting the motion to withdraw, where he had more than a year

to find representation after his prior counsel withdrew. See Ahmed, 569 F.3d at

1012; Biwot v. Gonzales, 403 F.3d 1094, 1099-1100 (9th Cir. 2005) (listing factors

to be considered when deciding what constitutes a reasonable time to obtain

counsel); see also Vides-Vides v. INS, 783 F.2d 1463, 1470 (9th Cir. 1986) (failure

to obtain counsel after two continuances over four months simply meant alien was

“unable to secure counsel at his own expense”). 

Cortez’s contention that the IJ did not properly question him about a

possible asylum claim is unavailing, where he never expressed a fear of

persecution to the IJ. See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.11(c)(1) (requiring an IJ to provide

information about applying for asylum if an alien expresses a fear of persecution or

harm upon being removed). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Cortez’s unexhausted contention that he

was never advised of the requirements for voluntary departure.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 15-71042