alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 15, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

OLGA GUTIERREZ, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS INDE PENDENT ADMINISTRATOR WITH W ILL ANNEXED FOR THE ESTATE OF

ENEDINA GUTIERREZ, DECEASED , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00755

- CV V.

STEWART TITLE COMPAN Y AND DON LORENZ AND JUDY LORENZ
, Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on August 31, 2016. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Olga Gutierrez, Individually and as Independent Administrator with Will Annexed for the Estate of Ene dina Gutierrez, Deceased. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 532.18

 533.02

 533.50

 534.44

 535.30

 536.43

 537.40

 537.84

 538.83

 539.47

 539.88

 539.83

 540.22

 540.76

 540.95

 541.55

 541.87

 541.62

 541.44

 541.08

 541.03

 540.94

 540.90

 540.86

 540.58

 540.59

 541.00

 541.46

 541.74

 542.10

 542.39

 1,891,980

 1,902,409

 1,908,378

 1,920,085

 1,930,818

 1,944,952

 1,957,113

 1,962,638

 1,975,089

 1,983,153

 1,988,325

 1,987,694

 1,992,618

 1,999,442

 2,001,845

 2,009,440

 2,013,494

 2,010,326

 2,008,047

 2,003,489

 2,002,857

 2,001,718

 2,001,212

 2,000,706

 1,997,166

 1,997,293

 2,002,477

 2,008,300

 2,011,847

 2,016,411

 2,020,089

 2,291

 4,082

 4,307

 3,456

 5,763

 4,769

 8,796

 3,613

 5,004

 4,635

 5,622

 4,467

 5,555

 7,501

 2,948

 3,710

 2,481

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,589

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,270

 0

 0

 0

 3,583

 5,377

 2,550

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL June 7, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2004 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 141,613 15,780 6,892 46,042

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 13,504

 10,429

 5,969

 11,707

 10,733

 14,134

 12,161

 5,525

 12,451

 8,064

 5,172

-631

 4,924

 6,824

 2,403

 7,595

 4,054

-3,168

-2,279

-4,558

-632

-1,139

-506

-506

-3,540

 127

 5,184

 5,823

 3,547

 4,564

 3,678

 314

 304

 308

 254

 96

 71

 67

 71

 73

 73

 76

 75

 82

 86

 125

 271

 167

 269

 356

 315

 320

 337

 329

 329

 304

 205

 345

 313

 365

 296

 296

395

1,789

-611

3,163

5,602

4,662

8,682

3,495

7,148

4,297

5,163

4,302

5,212

7,156

2,639

3,156

2,873

-154

-354

-4,602

-460

-382

-690

-3,909

-5,830

-3,106

-2,971

-525

-556

-679

1,137

ELEV STORAGE

 80,589

 907,106

 908,895

 908,284

 911,447

 917,049

 921,711

 930,393

 933,888

 941,036

 945,333

 950,496

 954,798

 960,010

 967,166

 969,805

 972,961

 975,834

 975,680

 975,326

 970,724

 970,264

 969,882

 969,192

 965,283

 959,453

 956,347

 953,376

 952,851

 952,295

 951,616

 952,753

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 906,711

-1,202

-1,202

-1,202

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2,110

0

0

0

0

-5,716
Case 20-01067-KHK Doc 10 Filed 11/04/20 Entered 11/05/20 11:08:46 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-121539, Form S-8 No. 333-112365, Form S-8 No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. 2004 OmnibusIncentive Compensation Plan, the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. 1990 Employee Stock Option Plan ofour reports dated March 17, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2011. 

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 17, 2011
#### William E. Mowbray v. Harriet De Forest, as Ancillary Executrix, etc.

—Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
OO0€ 0002 ooo! 0 oooL
[ — oe

Spsey

SO|IW |BOLINEN

000‘0r:| JAIVOS

6S

Bed 1 2
204
Lev3UY FOINUFS O14IVUL TH:
GNNOS 139Nd

BG

aNv1SI
NYAr NvS

. °
fot] vd Beug\ ,
DOF co 82)
Moons ZA Vd
is a :
ep ome Beuig

yi

gsuing

sjog #:
# Record of Contacts **FDMS Docket No. FAA**  **- 20**  **12 -**  **003 6**  **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response Transport Canada Helen Tsai

(613) 952 - 4357 6/27/11 No objections Bom bardie r Aerospace Kety Bussolo

(514) 855 - 5001 Ext. 60480 6/27/11 No objections Regional Airline Association Connie Arnold

202 - 367 - 1252 Arnold@raa.org 6/27/11 No objections
October 2023

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

44.12

1 1,195.77 44.08 -0.03 9 22 0 4 0.07 0.00

2 1,195.74 44.03 -0.05 -3 22 0 0 0.00 0.00

3 1,195.72 44.00 -0.03 14 22 0 9 0.16 0.00

4 1,195.68 43.93 -0.07 -1 22 0 11 0.20 0.00

5 1,195.67 43.92 -0.02 26 22 0 12 0.22 0.00

6 1,195.64 43.87 -0.05 7 22 0 10 0.19 0.00

7 1,195.63 43.85 -0.02 24 22 0 11 0.20 0.00

8 1,195.61 43.82 -0.03 17 22 0 12 0.23 0.00

9 1,195.59 43.78 -0.03 22 22 0 17 0.32 0.00

10 1,195.57 43.75 -0.03 11 22 0 6 0.12 0.00

11 1,195.54 43.70 -0.05 4 22 0 7 0.13 0.00

12 1,195.51 43.65 -0.05 3 22 0 6 0.12 0.00

13 1,195.50 43.63 -0.02 11 12 0 8 0.14 0.00

14 1,195.49 43.62 -0.02 9 12 0 5 0.10 0.00

15 1,195.48 43.60 -0.02 8 12 0 5 0.09 0.00

16 1,195.47 43.59 -0.02 10 12 0 6 0.12 0.00

17 1,195.46 43.57 -0.02 7 12 0 4 0.07 0.00

18 1,195.45 43.55 -0.02 10 12 0 7 0.13 0.00

19 1,195.44 43.54 -0.02 13 12 0 9 0.16 0.00

20 1,195.42 43.50 -0.03 4 12 0 9 0.16 0.00

21 1,195.40 43.47 -0.03 5 12 0 10 0.18 0.00

22 1,195.38 43.44 -0.03 3 12 0 8 0.14 0.02

23 1,195.45 43.55 0.12 71 12 0 1 0.01 0.96

24 1,195.44 43.54 -0.02 8 12 0 4 0.08 0.99

25 1,195.42 43.50 -0.03 1 12 0 6 0.11 0.99

26 1,195.41 43.49 -0.02 6 12 0 3 0.05 0.00

27 1,195.39 43.45 -0.03 -1 12 0 4 0.08 0.00

28 1,195.37 43.42 -0.03 -2 12 0 3 0.05 0.00

29 1,195.33 43.35 -0.07 -14 12 0 7 0.13 0.00

30 1,195.31 43.32 -0.03 2 12 0 7 0.13 0.00

31 1,195.29 43.29 -0.03 0 12 0 5 0.09 0.00

TOTALS -0.83 284 492 0 216 3.98 2.96

ACRE-FEET -830 563 976 0 428

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

 Data based on 24 hour period ending 0800.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 976

Spill 0

Total 976

Precipitation

This month = 2.96

October 01, 2023 To date = 2.96

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

East Park Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/10/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 499

 507

 513

 520

 531

 535

 535

 535

 537

 537

 537

 539

 540

 537

 538

 540

 542

 543

 544

 545

 547

 547

 547

 543

 546

 543

 727

 750

 741

 0

 480

 481

 501

 505

 514

 528

 530

 532

 533

 527

 533

 533

 535

 534

 534

 536

 537

 536

 535

 540

 541

 536

 539

 512

 532

 526

 426

 713

 629

 0

 487

 495

 506

 511

 522

 532

 532

 534

 535

 534

 535

 536

 537

 536

 536

 538

 540

 540

 540

 542

 544

 543

 542

 536

 540

 539

 559

 729

 717

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 317

 322

 329

 332

 339

 345

 345

 346

 347

 346

 347

 347

 348

 347

 347

 348

 350

 350

 350

 351

 352

 352

 351

 347

 350

 349

 361

 467

 459

TOTAL 15,817

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### Michael J. Caruselle, Respondent, v. Otis Sand *&*Gravel Co., Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 686.1 Scope and purpose.

The TEACH Grant program awards grants to students who intend to teach, to help meet the cost of their postsecondary education. In exchange for the grant, the student must agree to serve as a full-time teacher in a high-need field in a school serving low-income students, or as a full-time teacher in a high-need field for an educational service agency serving low-income students, for at least four academic years within eight years of ceasing enrollment at the institution where the student received the grant or, in the case of a student who receives a TEACH Grant at one institution and subsequently transfers to another institution and enrolls in another TEACH Grant-eligible program, within eight years of ceasing enrollment at the other institution. The eight-year period for completing the required four years of teaching does not include periods of suspension in accordance with § 686.41. If the student does not satisfy the service obligation, the amounts of the TEACH Grants received are treated as a Direct Unsubsidized Loan and must be repaid with interest charged from the date of each TEACH Grant disbursement. A TEACH Grant that has been converted to a Direct Unsubsidized Loan can be reconverted to a grant only in accordance with § 686.43.

[85 FR 49821, Aug. 14, 2020]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael S. Hedge, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Datrek Miller International, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

August 15, 2005
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 542 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish the National 

Urban Security Technology Laboratory, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2019 

Miss RICE of New York (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 

the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Research 

5 and Development for First Responders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL URBAN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY LAB7 ORATORY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Homeland Secu9 rity Act of 2002 is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing new section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 542 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 321. NATIONAL URBAN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY LAB2 ORATORY. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, acting through 

4 the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall 

5 designate the laboratory described in subsection (b) as an 

6 additional laboratory pursuant to the authority under sec7 tion 308(c)(2). Such laboratory shall be used to test and 

8 evaluate emerging technologies and conduct research and 

9 development to assist emergency response providers in 

10 preparing for, and protecting against, threats of terrorism. 

11 ‘‘(b) LABORATORY DESCRIBED.—The laboratory de12 scribed in this subsection is the laboratory— 

13 ‘‘(1) known, as of the date of the enactment of 

14 this section, as the National Urban Security Tech15 nology Laboratory; 

16 ‘‘(2) previously known as the Environmental 

17 Measurements Laboratory; and 

18 ‘‘(3) transferred to the Department pursuant to 

19 section 303(1)(E). 

20 ‘‘(c) LABORATORY ACTIVITIES.—The laboratory des21 ignated pursuant to subsection (a), shall— 

22 ‘‘(1) conduct tests, evaluations, and assess23 ments of current and emerging technologies, includ24 ing, as appropriate, cybersecurity of such tech25 nologies that can connect to the internet, for emer26 gency response providers; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 542 IH

1 ‘‘(2) conduct research and development on radi2 ological and nuclear response and recovery; 

3 ‘‘(3) act as a technical advisor to emergency re4 sponse providers; and 

5 ‘‘(4) carry out other such activities as the Sec6 retary determines appropriate.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

8 in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after 

9 the item relating to section 320 the following new item: 

‘‘321. National Urban Security Technology Laboratory.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### SUBTITLE VI—SOFTWOOD LUMBER

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subtitle is comprised of title VIII of act June 17, 1930, as added by Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3301(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1844. Another title VIII of act June 17, 1930, was added by Pub. L. 106–476, title IV, §4004(a), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2178, and is classified to subtitle V (§1681 et seq.) of this chapter.
### Part A—Joint Reviews Regarding Extension of USMCA
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that to his knowledge the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 to which this certification is being
furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item
601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Date: May 10, 2006

                                  /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    A. Roland Thomas
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Aloha, 

Pa'oneakai Lee-Namakaeha <kauikeolani_2004@hotmail.com> 

Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:02 PM 

EAS (OST) 

In Support of MAKANI KAI for the EAS 

As a resident of Kalaupapa I am STILL in continued support of Makani Kai for the EAS in Kalaupapa! Thank you for your 

consideration! 

Mahala, 

~:·. ' 

Pa'one 

Sent from my iPhone · •. l ... 

1
### §2. "County" as including "parish", and so forth

The word "county" includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633.)
### §1671g. Effect of derogation of Export-Import Bank financing

Nothing in this subtitle shall be interpreted as superseding the provisions of section 635a–3 of title 12, except that in the event of an assessment of duty based on a derogation under section 1671e of this title or action under section 1671b(d)(1)(B) of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall not authorize the Bank to provide guarantees, insurance and credits to competing United States sellers pursuant to section 635a–3 of title 12.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §708, as added Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §650(c)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1266; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1886(a)(6)(A), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §264(c)(11), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4914.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "1671b(d)(1)(B)" for "1671b(d)(2)".

1986—Pub. L. 99–514 added section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

#### Plan Amendments Not Required Until January 1, 1989

For provisions directing that if any amendments made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§1801–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5441 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5441

 To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total funding cap 
                 for the Essex National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2019

  Mr. Moulton (for himself and Mrs. Trahan) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the funding authorization sunset and the total funding cap 
                 for the Essex National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Repeal of Funding Authorization Sunset.--Section 507 of 
division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 
1996 (Public Law 104-333) is repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Total Funding Cap.--Section 508(a) of division II of 
the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 
104-333) is amended by striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
#### Julius Bodenheim v. The City of New York.

Application granted. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 24.277 Date of mailing or delivering of returns. ( a ) When the proprietor sends the Excise Tax Return, TTB F 5000.24, with or without remittance, by United States mail, the official postmark of the United States Postal Service stamped on the cover of the envelope in which the return was mailed is considered the date of delivery of the tax return and, if accompanied, the date of delivery of the remittance. When the postmark on the cover is illegible, it is the proprietor's responsibility to prove when the postmark was made.
( b ) When the proprietor sends the tax return by registered mail or by certified mail, the date of registry or the date of the postmark on the sender's receipt of certified mail, as the case may be, is treated at the date of delivery of the tax return and, if accompanied, the date of delivery of the remittance.
(August 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 775, as amended, 777, as amended, 391, as amended (26 U.S.C. 6301, 6311, 6302))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1512-0467 and 1512-0492)
#### § 75.612 Supervision and inspection by the grantee.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70332, Aug. 29, 2024.

A grantee shall maintain competent architectural engineering supervision and inspection at the construction site to insure that the work conforms to the approved drawings and specifications.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)