alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1922

WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for East View Trucking, 

Inc.,

Petitioner,

v.

CARL E. MATLICK; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(12-0543-BLA)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 25, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William S. Mattingly, Jeffrey R. Soukup, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, 

Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Cheryl Catherine 

Cowen, Waynesburg, Pennsylvania; Sean Gregory Bajkowski, 

Kathleen Kim, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

West Virginia CWP Fund seeks review of the Benefits 

Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative 

Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) award of black lung benefits to Carl E. 

Matlick, pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of 

the record discloses that the ALJ’s decision is based upon 

substantial evidence and is without reversible error. See

Island Creek Coal Co. v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203, 207-08 (4th Cir. 

2000) (providing standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the 

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           780,018
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,776,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                     300,000
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,806,991
<PP&E>                                       144,218,965  
<DEPRECIATION>                                67,909,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                92,672,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20,278,929 
<BONDS>                                       47,020,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           3,375
<OTHER-SE>                                    12,873,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  92,672,050
<SALES>                                       62,287,989 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              62,287,989
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 57,944,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,798,112 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (397,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (114,000) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (283,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (283,076)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
### Administrative Provisions
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 14, 2014

NO. 03-12-00242-CV

Billy Ross Sims, Appellant

v.

Jennifer Smith and Celia Turner, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 22, 2012. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 7,535

 7,902

 6,470

 5,793

 5,620

 6,391

 6,918

 7,105

 6,915

 7,602

 10,459

 9,806

 9,249

 8,341

 8,219

 8,115

 6,939

 5,527

 5,795

 5,909

 6,509

 6,972

 6,655

 6,995

 7,118

 6,740

 6,556

 6,219

 5,496

 4,863

 1,004

 1,124

 689

 597

 727

 852

 1,085

 989

 794

 1,241

 1,324

 2,003

 1,025

 1,125

 992

 1,077

 795

 730

 868

 1,010

 1,011

 817

 749

 650

 776

 538

 547

 612

 696

 543

 4,233

 4,435

 3,729

 3,272

 2,911

 2,915

 3,028

 3,318

 3,411

 4,149

 5,395

 4,970

 4,287

 3,945

 4,292

 4,406

 3,722

 2,957

 3,045

 2,894

 3,090

 3,235

 3,168

 3,338

 3,397

 3,067

 3,056

 2,757

 2,392

 2,425

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 51,032

 51,698

 52,308

 52,848

 52,888

 52,750

 52,238

 51,762

 51,298

 51,418

 52,931

 54,134

 54,252

 53,998

 54,057

 54,028

 54,021

 53,706

 53,840

 53,819

 53,881

 53,798

 53,555

 52,744

 50,746

 48,843

 47,612

 46,424

 44,524

 42,543

 3,645

 3,693

 3,736

 3,775

 3,778

 3,768

 3,731

 3,697

 3,664

 3,673

 3,781

 3,867

 3,875

 3,857

 3,861

 3,859

 3,859

 3,836

 3,846

 3,844

 3,849

 3,843

 3,825

 3,767

 3,625

 3,489

 3,401

 3,316

 3,180

 3,039

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 463.625 Can a one-stop operator also be a service provider?

Yes, but there must be appropriate firewalls in place in regards to the competition, and subsequent oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of performance of the service provider. The operator cannot develop, manage, or conduct the competition of a service provider in which it intends to compete. In cases where an operator is also a service provider, there must be firewalls and internal controls within the operator-service provider entity, as well as specific policies and procedures at the Local WDB level regarding oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of performance of the service provider. The firewalls must conform to the specifications in 20 CFR 679.430 for demonstrating internal controls and preventing conflicts of interest.
### §706a. Geneva distinctive emblems

(a) Whoever wears or displays the sign of the Red Crescent or the Third Protocol Emblem (the Red Crystal), or any insignia colored in imitation thereof for the fraudulent purpose of inducing the belief that he is a member of or an agent for an authorized national society using the Red Crescent or the Third Protocol Emblem, the International Committee of the Red Cross, or the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(b) Except as set forth in section 1 (c) and (d), whoever, whether a corporation, association, or person, uses the emblem of the Red Crescent or the Third Protocol Emblem on a white ground or any sign or insignia made or colored in imitation thereof or the designations "Red Crescent" or "Third Protocol Emblem" shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(c) The following may use such emblems and designations consistent with the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and, if applicable, the Additional Protocols:

(1) Authorized national societies that are members of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and their duly authorized employees and agents.

(2) The International Committee of the Red Cross and its duly authorized employees and agents.

(3) The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and its duly authorized employees and agents.

(4) The sanitary and hospital authorities of the armed forces of State Parties to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949.

(d) This section does not make unlawful the use of any such emblem, sign, insignia, or words which was lawful on or before December 8, 2005, if such use would not appear in time of armed conflict to confer the protections of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and, if applicable, the Additional Protocols.

(e) A violation of this section or section 706 may be enjoined at the civil suit of the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 109–481, §2(a), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3673.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsections".
###### Editorial Note on Part 22

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 22 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5476, Jan. 19, 2001 and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 22.103 States and the District of Columbia.

Except as otherwise provided in this section, tax-free alcohol withdrawn by a State or political subdivision of a State, or the District of Columbia shall be used solely for mechanical and scientific purposes, and except on approval of the appropriate TTB officer, the use of tax-free alcohol or the use of any resulting product will be confined to the premises under the control of the State or political subdivision of a State, or the District of Columbia. Tax-free alcohol withdrawn for use in hospitals, clinics, and other establishments specified in §§ 22.104 through 22.108, operated by a State, political subdivision of a State, or the District of Columbia, shall be used in the manner prescribed for those establishments.

(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1362, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214))
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Barry D. QuartBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John W. BeckJohn W. Beck, C.P.A.Senior Vice President, Finance and
Operations and Chief Financial Officer  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
  18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
  AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of EarthBlock Technologies, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        I, James E. Hines, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
        of the
        Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 EarthBlock
                  Technologies, IncDate:
                    November 21, 2006
              By:
              /s/
                  James E. Hines
 Chief
                  Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 478

 503

 506

 501

 494

 490

 495

 491

 498

 502

 507

 504

 505

 553

 592

 575

 555

 498

 472

 447

 427

 419

 400

 390

 389

 388

 388

 392

 384

 376

 466

 475

 497

 487

 484

 485

 483

 485

 487

 492

 494

 498

 494

 495

 548

 551

 490

 465

 438

 408

 405

 398

 386

 377

 372

 366

 366

 368

 369

 368

 472

 487

 502

 496

 490

 487

 490

 487

 491

 498

 500

 501

 499

 510

 566

 566

 529

 484

 454

 429

 415

 405

 393

 385

 379

 373

 372

 374

 374

 372

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 308

 317

 326

 323

 319

 317

 319

 317

 319

 324

 325

 326

 324

 331

 366

 366

 343

 315

 297

 281

 272

 266

 259

 254

 250

 247

 246

 247

 247

 246

TOTAL 13,780

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-212 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the UNITED KINGDOM OF 

GREAT BRITAIN AND 

NORTHERN IRELAND 

Signed at Rockville and Merseyside 

February 7 and 12, 2007 

with 

Appendices 

and 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN 

AND NORTHERN IRELAND 

 Nuclear Safety 

 Agreement signed at Rockville and 

 Merseyside February 7 and 12, 2007; 

 Entered into force February 12, 2007. 

 With appendices and annex.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19338-19339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13-023]


Green Island Power Authority; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    On March 2, 2009 Green Island Power Authority, licensee for the 
Green Island Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application for a New 
License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission's 
regulations thereunder. The Green Island Hydroelectric Project is on 
the Hudson River in Albany County, New York.
    The license for Project No. 13 was issued for a period ending March 
2, 2011. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a

[[Page 19339]]

license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 13 is issued to the 
Green Island Power Authority for a period effective March 3, 2011 
through March 2, 2012, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If 
issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on 
or before March 2, 2012, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Green Island Power Authority is authorized to 
continue operation of the Green Island Hydroelectric Project, until 
such time as the Commission acts on its application for a subsequent 
license.

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8249 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

IMPCO Technologies, Inc. 

Cerritos, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed openRegistration Statements, (a) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38649); (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-07035); (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-62889); (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No.333-44085); (e) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-71544); (f) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-82110); (g) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-88690); (h) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-102069); (i)the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-102068); (j) the Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-120029); (k) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-118689); of our reports dated March 31, 2005, relating to the consolidated financialstatements, the effectiveness of IMPCO Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which included an adverse opinion as to the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, and the schedule of IMPCOTechnologies, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

June 28, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,267

 1,254

 1,277

 1,292

 1,283

 1,281

 1,280

 1,258

 1,294

 1,387

 1,414

 1,402

 1,378

 1,410

 1,333

 1,285

 1,284

 1,294

 1,280

 1,283

 1,340

 1,402

 1,434

 1,425

 1,410

 1,381

 1,370

 1,443

 1,427

 1,324

 1,269

 1,124

 1,114

 1,101

 1,100

 1,095

 1,118

 1,080

 1,084

 1,102

 1,120

 1,114

 1,091

 1,076

 1,105

 1,048

 1,061

 1,078

 1,075

 1,070

 1,078

 1,095

 1,119

 1,139

 1,120

 1,097

 1,084

 1,072

 1,064

 1,075

 1,026

 1,016

 1,217

 1,208

 1,207

 1,209

 1,200

 1,207

 1,191

 1,178

 1,190

 1,225

 1,242

 1,230

 1,231

 1,251

 1,196

 1,194

 1,192

 1,190

 1,181

 1,183

 1,212

 1,249

 1,270

 1,252

 1,241

 1,231

 1,229

 1,259

 1,249

 1,201

 1,164

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
# Append 1. Invert Attribute list
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James G. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and



2. The information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 27, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James G. Clark
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:              |  | James G. Clark         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-930 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MARITIME OPERATIONS 

Counter-Drugs 

 Protocol between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 

Amending the Agreement of 

April 19, 1995 

As Amended 

Signed at Washington September 30, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 

 

 Maritime Operations: Counter-Drugs 

 Protocol amending the agreement of April 19, 1995, 

 as amended. 

 Signed at Washington September 30, 2003; 

 Entered into force September 30, 2003.