alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 120

 132

 143

 147

 150

 158

 157

 159

 163

 159

 161

 159

 157

 157

 160

 163

 167

 178

 185

 189

 165

 142

 166

 186

 169

 134

 132

 132

 145

 142

 134

 77

 86

 108

 115

 123

 121

 134

 129

 142

 142

 148

 148

 147

 146

 151

 153

 152

 153

 132

 105

 105

 108

 124

 105

 106

 99

 101

 114

 114

 113

 117

 92

 111

 127

 130

 135

 136

 143

 146

 152

 152

 153

 152

 152

 153

 157

 156

 158

 162

 165

 154

 137

 130

 144

 141

 138

 119

 121

 124

 127

 127

 124

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,281

 1,305

 1,346

 1,386

 1,427

 1,468

 1,516

 1,561

 1,620

 1,682

 1,745

 1,807

 1,871

 1,934

 1,999

 2,044

 2,075

 2,107

 2,137

 2,155

 2,149

 2,133

 2,125

 2,114

 2,099

 2,066

 2,035

 2,006

 1,976

 1,947

 1,913

 92

 93

 96

 99

 102

 105

 108

 112

 116

 120

 125

 129

 134

 138

 143

 146

 148

 151

 153

 154

 154

 152

 152

 151

 150

 148

 145

 143

 141

 139

 137

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 75.219 Exceptions to the procedures under § 75.217. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70326 , Aug. 29, 2024.
The Secretary may select an application for funding without following the procedures in § 75.217 if: ( a ) The objectives of the project cannot be achieved unless the Secretary makes the grant before the date grants can be made under the procedures in § 75.217;
( b ) ( 1 ) The application was evaluated under the preceding competition of the program;
( 2 ) The application rated high enough to deserve selection under § 75.217; and
( 3 ) The application was not selected for funding because the application was mishandled by the Department; or
( c ) The Secretary receives an unsolicited application that meets the requirements of § 75.222.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 27804, July 24, 1987; 60 FR 12096, Mar. 3, 1995]
### §261. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Feb. 13, 1911, ch. 46, §5, 36 Stat. 901; Feb. 7, 1920, ch. 61, 41 Stat. 402; Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 990; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §315, 84 Stat. 293, provided extra compensation for boarding officers performing services at night or on Sundays and holidays, prior to the general revision of section 5 of act Feb. 13, 1911, by section 13811(a) of Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 668. Section 5 of act Feb. 13, 1911, as amended by section 13811(a) of Pub. L. 103–66, is classified to section 267 of this title.
#### Lyle W. Fullington, as Administrator of the Estate of Marilyn M. F. Donnelly, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent, v. George Donnelly, Respondent-Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except MeCurn, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the finding of the jury that Richard Donnelly survived his wife, the decedent, is against the weight of evidence. ' (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Defendant’s appeal is from that part of the judgment and order which added the affidavit of a juror to the record in the ease.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350

(ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the periodic report of IMPCO Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2002 as amended on February 4, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Timothy S. Stone, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      
|----------------------
|Date: February 5, 2003
|
No. 16,123.

#### Napheys *v.*Napheys.

(198 P. [2d] 456)

Decided September 27, 1948.

Rehearing denied October 18, 1948.

Mr. Erskine R. Myer, Mr. Donald C. McKinlay, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. B. F. Napheys, Jr., pro se.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
### §3009. Coordination of trade policy and Convention

The United States Trade Representative is responsible for coordination of United States trade policy in relation to the Convention. Before formulating any United States position with respect to the Convention, including any proposed amendments thereto, the United States Trade Representative shall seek, and consider, information and advice from interested parties in the private sector (including a functional advisory committee) and from interested Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1209, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1152.)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 Day Accum Mean 14 Day Avg Mean

1 168 132 147 2,228 159

2 170 133 145 2,210 158

3 154 142 148 2,194 157

4 163 150 157 2,187 156

5 161 152 155 2,177 156

6 165 157 159 2,174 155

7 165 161 163 2,173 155

8 167 162 165 2,174 155

9 166 160 163 2,174 155

10 164 159 162 2,175 155

11 167 160 163 2,181 156

12 173 160 165 2,195 157

13 177 161 166 2,208 158

14 171 160 162 2,220 159

15 179 157 164 2,237 160

16 174 164 167 2,259 161

17 181 163 169 2,280 163

18 175 157 164 2,287 163

19 166 158 161 2,293 164

20 175 157 161 2,295 164

21 165 158 161 2,293 164

22 168 162 165 2,293 164

23 175 165 170 2,300 164

24 177 162 168 2,306 165

25 173 159 166 2,309 165

26 168 161 163 2,307 165

27 176 152 158 2,299 164

28 176 152 156 2,293 164

29 179 149 157 2,286 163

30 175 149 155 2,274 162

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-20-2007

Bricker v. Comm of PA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-4713

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Bricker v. Comm of PA" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 903.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/903
ALD-255 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 06-4713

________________

RONALD L. BRICKER,

 Appellant

 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;

JOSEPH H. KLEINFELTER; JUSTIN J. MCSHANE;

MARK F. BAYLEY; JEN BEVAN; R. MARK THOMAS;

DIANE MORGAN

____________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civ. No. 06-CV-01729)

District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo

_______________________________________

Submitted For Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Possible Summary

Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

June 7, 2007

BEFORE: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, CIRCUIT JUDGES

(Filed June 20, 2007)

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Ronald L. Bricker appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the
 1

 We further find no error in the District Court’s decision to deny Bricker’s motion for

reconsideration.

2

Middle District of Pennsylvania, dismissing his complaint without prejudice, and from an

order denying his motion for reconsideration. For the reasons that follow, we will dismiss

the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

Bricker’s complaint in the District Court was purportedly filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. However, the allegations of his complaint concerned the manner in which

he was convicted, and his continued confinement. The District Court correctly concluded

that to the extent Appellant was challenging the fact or duration of his conviction or

sentence, his remedy is in the form of habeas, not 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Leamer v.

Fauver, 288 F.3d 532, 542 (3d Cir. 2002) (“whenever the challenge ultimately attacks the

‘core of habeas’--the validity of the continued conviction or the fact or length of the

sentence--a challenge, however denominated and regardless of the relief sought, must be

brought by way of habeas corpus petition”). 

Because Bricker’s appeal is legally frivolous, we must dismiss it pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).1
### §213. Acceptance of loan or gratuity by financial institution examiner

(a) In General.—Whoever, being an examiner or assistant examiner, accepts a loan or gratuity from any bank, branch, agency, organization, corporation, association, or institution examined by the examiner or from any person connected with it, shall—

(1) be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both;

(2) may be fined a further sum equal to the money so loaned or gratuity given; and

(3) shall be disqualified from holding office as an examiner.

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the terms "examiner", "Federal financial institution regulatory agency", "financial institution", and "loan" have the same meanings as in section 212.

(Added Pub. L. 108–198, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2900.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 213, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 695, §213, formerly §218; Pub. L. 85–699, title VII, §701(b), Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 698; renumbered §213, Pub. L. 87–849, §1(d), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1125; Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §962(a)(2), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2597(c), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4909; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§330004(2), 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2141, 2147, related to acceptance of loan or gratuity by bank examiner, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–198, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2899.

Another prior section 213, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 693, related to the acceptance or demand of a bribe by a customs officer or employee, prior to the general amendment to this chapter by Pub. L. 87–849 and is substantially covered by revised section 201.
### §§1601, 1601a. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 1601, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §601, 46 Stat. 753, related to bribery.

Section 1601a, act Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title III, §309, 49 Stat. 528, related to wearing of uniform or badge of Coast Guard or Customs Service while violating revenue laws. See sections 702, 703, and 912 of Title 18.
#### In the Matter of George J. Northrup against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### §3910. Kimberley Process Implementation Coordinating Committee

The President shall establish a Kimberley Process Implementation Coordinating Committee to coordinate the implementation of this chapter. The Committee shall be composed of the following individuals or their designees:

(1) The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of State, who shall be co-chairpersons.

(2) The Secretary of Commerce.

(3) The United States Trade Representative.

(4) The Secretary of Homeland Security.

(5) A representative of any other agency the President deems appropriate.

(Pub. L. 108–19, §11, Apr. 25, 2003, 117 Stat. 635.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of this section, see section 15 of Pub. L. 108–19, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For assignment of functions of President under this section, see section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 13312, July 29, 2003, 68 F.R. 45151, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.
§ 361.705 What guidance must the Governor issue regarding one-stop infrastructure funding? ( a ) The Governor, after consultation with chief elected officials, the State WDB, and Local WDBs, and consistent with guidance and policies provided by the State WDB, must develop and issue guidance for use by local areas, specifically: ( 1 ) Guidelines for State-administered one-stop partner programs for determining such programs' contributions to a one-stop delivery system, based on such programs' proportionate use of such system, and relative benefit received, consistent with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, including determining funding for the costs of infrastructure; and
( 2 ) Guidance to assist Local WDBs, chief elected officials, and one-stop partners in local areas in determining equitable and stable methods of funding the costs of infrastructure at one-stop centers based on proportionate use and relative benefit received, and consistent with Federal cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) The guidance must include: ( 1 ) The appropriate roles of the one-stop partner programs in identifying one-stop infrastructure costs;
( 2 ) Approaches to facilitate equitable and efficient cost allocation that results in a reasonable cost allocation methodology where infrastructure costs are charged to each partner based on its proportionate use of the one-stop centers and relative benefit received, consistent with Federal cost principles at 2 CFR part 200; and
( 3 ) The timelines regarding notification to the Governor for not reaching local agreement and triggering the State funding mechanism described in § 361.730, and timelines for a one-stop partner to submit an appeal in the State funding mechanism.
### §3741. Sense of the Congress regarding efforts to combat desertification in Africa and other countries

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) desertification affects approximately one-sixth of the world's population and one-quarter of the total land area;

(2) over 1,000,000 hectares of Africa are affected by desertification;

(3) dryland degradation is an underlying cause of recurrent famine in Africa;

(4) the United Nations Environment Programme estimates that desertification costs the world $42,000,000,000 a year, not including incalculable costs in human suffering; and

(5) the United States can strengthen its partnerships throughout Africa and other countries affected by desertification, help alleviate social and economic crises caused by misuse of natural resources, and reduce dependence on foreign aid, by taking a leading role to combat desertification.

#### (b) Sense of the Congress

It is the sense of the Congress that the United States should expeditiously work with the international community, particularly Africa and other countries affected by desertification, to—

(1) strengthen international cooperation to combat desertification;

(2) promote the development of national and regional strategies to address desertification and increase public awareness of this serious problem and its effects;

(3) develop and implement national action programs that identify the causes of desertification and measures to address it; and

(4) recognize the essential role of local governments and nongovernmental organizations in developing and implementing measures to address desertification.

(Pub. L. 106–200, title I, §131, May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 274.)
1

WARNELL OWENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5062

________________________/

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Warnell Owens, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United Stated Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Soyodo Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the nine months period ended September
30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   October 31, 2005                         /s/ Song Ru-Hua
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Song Ru-Hua, President

Dated:   October 31, 2005                         /s/ Zhou Zong-Zheng
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Zhou Zong-Zheng, Treasurer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789789
<NAME> 86A.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         118,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,647
<PP&E>                                       7,095,382
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,293,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,000,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     979,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,000,424
<SALES>                                        605,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               614,396
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,082,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (467,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (467,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (467,727)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (45.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,193.88

 1,193.74

 1,193.58

 1,193.44

 1,193.40

 1,193.37

 1,193.36

 1,193.32

 1,193.28

 1,193.24

 1,193.22

 1,193.19

 1,193.16

 1,193.13

 1,193.11

 1,193.08

 1,193.05

 1,193.02

 1,192.98

 1,192.94

 1,192.90

 1,192.88

 1,192.85

 1,192.82

 1,192.79

 1,192.74

 1,192.71

 1,192.71

 1,192.64

 1,192.61

 1,192.57

 41.00

 40.78

 40.52

 40.30

 40.24

 40.19

 40.18

 40.11

 40.05

 39.98

 39.95

 39.91

 39.86

 39.81

 39.78

 39.73

 39.68

 39.64

 39.57

 39.51

 39.45

 39.42

 39.37

 39.33

 39.28

 39.20

 39.16

 39.16

 39.05

 39.00

 38.94

STORAGE

-0.22

-0.22

-0.25

-0.22

-0.06

-0.05

-0.02

-0.06

-0.06

-0.06

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.06

-0.06

-0.06

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.08

-0.05

+0.00

-0.11

-0.05

-0.06

CHANGE

3

5

-6

2

-8

1

19

-2

-4

-9

8

2

2

5

15

6

2

1

-6

-8

-7

7

2

2

7

-7

2

26

-23

6

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 102

 102

 102

 102

 10

 10

 10

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 13

 15

 20

 12

 14

 15

 17

 18

 16

 11

 12

 14

 14

 17

 19

 18

 14

 13

 14

 11

 12

 11

 13

 13

 19

 20

 14

 14

 19

 17

 21

C.F.S.

 .26

 .29

 .38

 .24

 .28

 .29

 .33

 .35

 .31

 .21

 .23

 .28

 .28

 .34

 .38

 .35

 .28

 .25

 .27

 .21

 .23

 .22

 .25

 .25

 .38

 .40

 .27

 .27

 .37

 .34

 .42

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/02/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.29 45 726 0 470 9.21 .00

ACRE-FEET -2,290 89 1,440 0 932

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,440

 1,440

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2008 .00

 41.22