alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          4,951
<SECURITIES>                                    1,806
<RECEIVABLES>                                     465
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,401
<PP&E>                                          1,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,592
<BONDS>                                         1,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           19
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,947
<SALES>                                         6,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,050
<CGS>                                           3,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   705
<INCOME-TAX>                                       31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               674
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      674
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .37



</TABLE>
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

April-05

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 15 12 27 29 4,024 1,997 6,022 7,982 3,962 11,944 0.0 2-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 3 12 15 29 3,445 2,012 5,457 6,833 3,990 10,823 0.0 3-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 3 12 15 26 4,367 2,607 6,974 8,662 5,170 13,832 0.0 4-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 21 12 33 27 4,926 2,829 7,754 9,770 5,611 15,381 0.0 5-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 30 12 42 22 4,926 2,724 7,650 9,770 5,404 15,174 0.0 6-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 19 5,436 2,758 8,194 10,782 5,470 16,252 0.0 7-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 14 5,666 2,775 8,441 11,239 5,504 16,743 0.0 8-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 15 5,909 2,214 8,123 11,721 4,391 16,112 0.0 9-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 16 5,913 1,974 7,887 11,728 3,916 15,644 0.0 

10-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 16 5,887 1,971 7,858 11,677 3,909 15,586 0.0 11-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 17 5,881 1,973 7,854 11,665 3,914 15,579 0.0 12-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 16 5,887 1,940 7,827 11,677 3,848 15,525 0.0 13-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 16 5,628 1,919 7,547 11,164 3,806 14,970 0.0 14-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 16 5,838 1,949 7,787 11,580 3,865 15,445 0.0 

15-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 6,406 1,966 8,372 12,707 3,899 16,606 0.0 16-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 5,986 1,968 7,954 11,873 3,903 15,776 0.0 17-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 12 3,959 1,972 5,931 7,853 3,911 11,764 0.0 18-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2,409 1,970 4,380 4,779 3,908 8,687 0.0 

19-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 21 0 21 8 2,553 1,974 4,527 5,064 3,915 8,979 0.0 

20-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 9 2,508 1,971 4,479 4,975 3,910 8,885 0.0 

21-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 11 3,464 1,006 4,470 6,870 1,996 8,866 0.0 

22-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 12 3,217 965 4,181 6,380 1,914 8,294 0.0 

23-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 24 0 24 12 2,108 1,890 3,998 4,182 3,749 7,931 0.0 

24-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 9 24 33 13 1,458 2,516 3,973 2,891 4,990 7,881 0.0 

25-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 15 1,144 2,762 3,906 2,269 5,479 7,748 0.0 

26-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 60 66 19 993 2,763 3,756 1,970 5,480 7,450 0.0 

27-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 192 198 33 612 2,210 2,822 1,214 4,384 5,598 0.0 

28-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 12 180 192 46 760 1,990 2,750 1,507 3,948 5,455 0.0 

29-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 6 180 186 59 736 1,979 2,715 1,460 3,926 5,386 0.0 

30-Apr-05 0 0 0 0 0 360 360 85 739 1,980 2,718 1,465 3,927 5,392 0.0 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 333 1,080 1,413 XXXX 112,785 63,524 176,309 223,709 125,999 349,708 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for April = 1,100

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta 

Daily D

Tracy Combined SWP
Halifax, NS lukacs@AirPassengerRights.ca
April 26, 2013

**VIA EMAIL** Department of Transportation United States of America

Dear Madam or Sir: **Re: Motion of Airlines for America (A4A) and Regional Airline Association for a Temporary Exemption from 14 C.F.R. §259.4**  **(Document ID DOT-OST-2013-0084-0001)** Please accept the following submissions in opposition to the motion for a temporarily exemption of airlines from 14 C.F.R. §259.4 on behalf of Air Passenger Rights. 1. Passengers purchase tickets from airlines for the purpose of travel, and submit themselves to a limited control of the crew by way of accepting the crew’s authority with respect to safety issues on board. 2. Purchasing an airfare, however, does not mean that passengers waive their human rights, and agree to be incarcerated and held hostage in an idling aircraft, which serves no purpose with respect to their travel. 3. We submit that it is unreasonable to confine passengers to a small space (aircraft) without adequate facilities and meals for a prolonged period of time. 4. We submit that the right of passengers to dignity and liberty of their person entails their right to disembark an idling aircraft after a reasonable amount of time, and this fundamental right outweighs any consideration related to the airlines’ statutory, operational, and commercial obligations.April 26, 2013 Page 2 of 2
5. It is submitted that safety is the sole consideration that may override the aforementioned right of passengers. In particular, we are struggling to see how the FAA sequester cuts could possibly justify temporarily legalizing the incarceration of passengers in idling aircrafts on the tarmac, and interference with the most fundamental freedom of passengers, namely, the freedom to disembark. 6. We submit that in striking the balance between the rights of passengers and the airlines’ obligations, the airlines are in a far better position to adjust to the new circumstances that the FAA sequester cuts may create. Therefore, we respectfully submit that the motion is lacking any merit, and it ought to be dismissed.
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Gábor Lukács
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.33

 1,198.40

 1,198.48

 1,198.45

 1,198.42

 1,198.40

 1,198.42

 1,198.42

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.38

 1,198.39

 1,198.47

 1,198.49

 1,198.49

 1,198.67

 1,199.42

 1,198.92

 1,198.68

 1,198.81

 1,198.83

 1,198.99

 1,198.81

 1,198.79

 1,198.69

 1,198.62

 1,198.57

 1,198.56

 48.48

 48.60

 48.75

 48.69

 48.64

 48.60

 48.63

 48.63

 48.60

 48.59

 48.57

 48.55

 48.53

 48.56

 48.58

 48.72

 48.76

 48.76

 49.08

 50.42

 49.52

 49.10

 49.33

 49.36

 49.65

 49.33

 49.29

 49.11

 48.99

 48.90

 48.88

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.12

+0.14

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

+0.03

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.03

+0.02

+0.14

+0.04

+0.00

+0.32

+1.34

-0.90

-0.42

+0.23

+0.04

+0.29

-0.32

-0.04

-0.18

-0.12

-0.09

-0.02

CHANGE

66

191

269

142

114

106

158

144

107

111

105

95

87

131

129

260

226

206

562

2,227

261

199

685

616

959

410

529

333

262

243

270

INFLOW

 71

 122

 191

 164

 138

 122

 138

 138

 122

 114

 107

 99

 92

 107

 114

 182

 201

 201

 395

 1,547

 711

 407

 566

 592

 809

 566

 541

 419

 337

 282

 271

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 5

 5

 4

 2

 1

 3

 5

 2

 5

 6

 4

 3

 7

 5

 5

 6

 4

 5

 2

 3

 5

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 5

 5

 7

C.F.S.

 .06

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .04

 .08

 .11

 .07

 .06

 .12

 .08

 .08

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .04

 .06

 .09

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .09

 .08

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .57

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .12

 .32

 1.31

 .00

 .00

 1.07

 .05

 .70

 .08

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/25/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.37 10,203 31 9,866 134 2.33 4.72

ACRE-FEET +370 20,238 61 19,569 266

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 19,569

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 19,630

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.72

JULY 1, 2010 17.41

 48.50
EERE Information Center Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Residential Heating Products Preliminary Analytical Tools The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared the analytical spreadsheets listed below for the preliminary analyses conducted for the phase preceding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on residential heating products, including water heaters, direct heating equipment, and pool heaters.


### NOPR Analytical Spreadsheets Engineering Spreadsheet Gas-fired Storage Water Heater Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 172 KB ) Oil-fired Storage Water Heater Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 204 KB ) Electric Storage Water Heater Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 164 KB ) Instantaneous Gas-fired Water Heater Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 116 KB ) Direct Heating Equipment Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 160 KB ) Pool Heater Engineering Spreadsheet ( Excel 96 KB )

Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Gas-fired Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.3 MB ) Oil-fired Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 908 KB ) Electric Storage Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.2 MB ) Instantaneous Gas-fired Water Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.3 MB ) Gas Wall Fan Direct Heating Equipment LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.5 MB ) Gas Wall Gravity Direct Heating Equipment LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.5 MB ) Gas Floor Direct Heating Equipment LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.5 MB ) Gas Room Direct Heating Equipment LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.5 MB ) Pool Heater LCC and PBP Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.4 MB )

National Impacts Analysis Water Heater National Impacts Analysis 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Heating P... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/...

1 of 2 1/21/2009 11:23 A MSpreadsheet ( Excel 6.2 MB ) Direct Heating Equipment National Impacts Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.2 MB ) Pool Heater National Impacts Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 3.3 MB )



### Contact Information
Mohammed Khan Project Manager for Heating Products (202) 586-7892

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home| EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies| Security & Privacy| USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/12/2009 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Heating P... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/...

2 of 2 1/21/2009 11:23 A M
#### § 75.614 Grantee must have operational funds.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70332, Aug. 29, 2024.

A grantee shall insure that, when construction is completed, sufficient funds will be available for effective operation and maintenance of the facilities.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
§ 19.28 Emergency variations from requirements. ( a ) *Application.* A proprietor may request emergency approval of the use of a method or procedure relating to construction, equipment, and methods of operation that represents a variance from the requirements of this part. When a proprietor wishes to use an emergency method or procedure, the proprietor must submit a written letterhead application to the appropriate TTB officer for approval; the proprietor may send the application via regular mail, email, or facsimile transmission. The application must describe the proposed emergency method or procedure and the emergency situation it will address. For purposes of this section, an emergency is considered to exist only if it results from a weather or other natural event or from an accident or other event not involving an intentional act on the part of the proprietor.
( b ) *Approval.* The appropriate TTB officer may approve in writing the use of an emergency method or procedure if the proprietor demonstrates that an emergency exists and the proposed method or procedure: ( 1 ) Is not contrary to law;
( 2 ) Is necessary to address the emergency situation;
( 3 ) Will afford the same security and protection to the revenue as intended by the regulations; and
( 4 ) Will not hinder the effective administration of this subpart.
( c ) *Terms of emergency method or procedure approval and use.* ( 1 ) The proprietor may not use an emergency method or procedure until the application has been approved by TTB except when the emergency method or procedure requires immediate implementation to correct a situation that threatens life or property. In a situation involving a threat to life or property, the proprietor may implement the corrective action while concurrently notifying the appropriate TTB officer by telephone of the action and filing the required written application. Use of the emergency method or procedure must conform to any conditions specified in the approval.
( 2 ) The proprietor must retain the emergency method or procedure approval as part of the proprietor's records and must make the approval available for examination by TTB officers upon request.
( 3 ) The emergency method or procedure will automatically terminate when the situation that created the emergency no longer exists. TTB may withdraw the approval to use the emergency method or procedure if TTB finds that the revenue is jeopardized, that the emergency method or procedure hinders effective administration of the laws or regulations, or that the proprietor has failed to follow any of the conditions specified in the approval. When use of the emergency method or procedure terminates, the proprietor must revert to full compliance with all applicable regulations.
(26 U.S.C. 5178, 5556)
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report"), I, Linda B. Grable, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Linda B. Grable


Linda B. Grable


Chief Executive Officer and


Chairman of the Board


October 13, 2009
481 P.2d 707

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David E. McNEECE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 529.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Feb. 12, 1971.

Mari W. Privette, H. Gregg Privette, Privette & Privette, Las Cruces, for defendant-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Leila Andrews, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant was erroneously convicted and sentenced because the proceedings against him, for possession of marijuana, were under the inapplicable general statute, § 54-7-13, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1969). The applicable statute is § 54-5-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol, 8, pt. 2). State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (Ct.App.), decided December 11, 1970.

The appeal does not question which statute is the applicable one. However, “* * * [ljack of jurisdiction at any stage of a proceeding is a controlling consideration to be resolved before going further. * • * * ” State v. Arnold, *51**346N.M. 311, 183 P.2d 845 (1947). We may raise the question of jurisdiction on our own motion. State v. Weddle, 77 N.M. 417, 423 P.2d 609 (1967); State v. Arnold, supra.

Is the conviction and sentence of defendant under an inapplicable statute a question of jurisdiction? We hold that it is. One aspect of jurisdiction is the power or authority to decide the particular matter presented. Heckathorn v. Heckathorn, 77 N.M. 369, 423 P.2d 410 (1967), and cases therein cited; see dissent in Neller v. State, 79 N.M. 528; 445 P.2d 949 (1968). The trial court had no authority to convict and sentence defendant under an inapplicable statute. It, therefore, proceeded without .jurisdiction.

' Defendant’s conviction and sentence are reversed. The cause is remanded with- instructions to dismiss the charge against defendant under the inapplicable statute. State v. Riley, supra.

It is so ordered.

LaFEL E. OMAN, Justice, Supreme Court, and HENDLEY, J., concur.
Exhibit 11
                 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings

                      CAVALIER HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                -------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>              <C> 
                                                    1998              1997             1996
                                                --------------    --------------   --------------

 BASIC & PRIMARY
      Net Income                                $      18,655     $      10,247    $     27,479
                                                ==============    ==============   ==============

 SHARES:

   Weighted average common shares
      outstanding (basic)                          19,904,746        19,834,942      19,362,944

   Dilutive effect of stock options
     and warrants                                     239,049           193,239         436,548
                                                --------------    --------------   --------------

   Weighted average common shares
     outstanding, assuming dilution (diluted)      20,143,795        20,028,181      19,799,492
                                                ==============    ==============   ==============
</TABLE>
### §3731. Sense of the Congress regarding comprehensive debt relief for the world's poorest countries

#### (a) Findings

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) The burden of external debt has become a major impediment to economic growth and poverty reduction in many of the world's poorest countries.

(2) Until recently, the United States Government and other official creditors sought to address this problem by rescheduling loans and in some cases providing limited debt reduction.

(3) Despite such efforts, the cumulative debt of many of the world's poorest countries continued to grow beyond their capacity to repay.

(4) In 1997, the Group of Seven, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund adopted the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC), a commitment by the international community that all multilateral and bilateral creditors, acting in a coordinated and concerted fashion, would reduce poor country debt to a sustainable level.

(5) The HIPC Initiative is currently undergoing reforms to address concerns raised about country conditionality, the amount of debt forgiven, and the allocation of savings realized through the debt forgiveness program to ensure that the Initiative accomplishes the goals of economic growth and poverty alleviation in the world's poorest countries.

#### (b) Sense of the Congress

It is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) Congress and the President should work together, without undue delay and in concert with the international community, to make comprehensive debt relief available to the world's poorest countries in a manner that promotes economic growth and poverty alleviation;

(2) this program of bilateral and multilateral debt relief should be designed to strengthen and expand the private sector, encourage increased trade and investment, support the development of free markets, and promote broad-scale economic growth in beneficiary countries;

(3) this program of debt relief should also support the adoption of policies to alleviate poverty and to ensure that benefits are shared widely among the population, such as through initiatives to advance education, improve health, combat AIDS, and promote clean water and environmental protection;

(4) these debt relief agreements should be designed and implemented in a transparent manner and with the broad participation of the citizenry of the debtor country and should ensure that country circumstances are adequately taken into account;

(5) no country should receive the benefits of debt relief if that country does not cooperate with the United States on terrorism or narcotics enforcement, is a gross violator of the human rights of its citizens, or is engaged in conflict or spends excessively on its military; and

(6) in order to prevent adverse impact on a key industry in many developing countries, the International Monetary Fund must mobilize its own resources for providing debt relief to eligible countries without allowing gold to reach the open market, or otherwise adversely affecting the market price of gold.

(Pub. L. 106–200, title I, §121, May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 267.)
#### § 75.223 [Reserved]