alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 00029

#### Edward J. Madden and Eleanor R. Madden as parents of Edward Madden, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 30, 1973.*

Edward J. Madden and Eleanor R. Madden, Claimants, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim was filed pursuant to *1971 Ch. 48, Sec. 28 et. seq., Ill. Rev. Stat.,*"Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”. The Court is in receipt of the Application for Benefits and Statement of Supervising Officer, as well as an investigative report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office. Based upon these documents, the Court finds as follows:

That the claimants, Edward J. Madden and Eleanor R. Madden are the parents of the decedent and are the named beneficiaries under the Application for Benefits. That the decedent, Edward Madden, was an investigator for the Chicago Police Department, engaged in the scope of his duties on September 28, 1972, within the meaning of Section 282 of the aforecited Act. On said date, Officer Madden was called to the location of a "stake-out” at 1464 West Olive Avenue, Chicago. Officer Madden was at the top of an "L” shaped flight of stairs *515with a gun in his hand. A fellow officer, Officer Shurtleff, stepped into the vestibule below and, as he could only see the legs and hands of Officer Madden, he shouted "Hold it right there!” Officer Madden turned. Officer Shurtleff saw the gun in his hand and fired one shot. Officer Madden died on October 2, 1972, from post-operative complications resulting from a gun shot wound of the face "with perforation and compression of the cervical cord, level of the 3rd or 4th cervical”. The Court further finds that the Attorney General’s office in its investigation has determined that this claim is within the scope of the above cited statutes:

> "Section 282[e] 'killed in the line of duty’ means losing one’s life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer or fireman if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause. . . .”

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be, and the same hereby is, granted to Edward J. Madden and Eleanor R Madden, as parents and next of kin of the decedent, Edward Madden.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

August-07

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6,994 4,413 11,408 13,873 8,754 22,627 

2-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 5 6,988 4,458 11,446 13,861 8,842 22,703 3-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6,992 4,459 11,450 13,868 8,844 22,712 4-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 6,994 4,452 11,445 13,872 8,830 22,702 5-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 5 7,029 4,459 11,489 13,943 8,845 22,788 6-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6,791 4,385 11,176 13,470 8,697 22,167 7-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6,965 4,372 11,337 13,815 8,672 22,487 8-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7,082 4,434 11,516 14,047 8,794 22,841 9-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 5 6,971 4,461 11,432 13,826 8,849 22,675 

10-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 5 7,301 4,444 11,745 14,482 8,814 23,296 11-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 5 5,575 4,430 10,005 11,058 8,787 19,845 12-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7,864 4,423 12,288 15,599 8,774 24,373 13-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7,186 4,373 11,559 14,254 8,674 22,928 14-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7,188 4,425 11,613 14,258 8,777 23,035 

15-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7,654 4,441 12,095 15,181 8,809 23,990 

16-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,041 4,453 11,494 13,966 8,832 22,798 17-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,181 4,443 11,623 14,243 8,812 23,055 18-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,093 4,444 11,536 14,068 8,814 22,882 19-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 7,115 4,420 11,535 14,112 8,768 22,880 20-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 6,824 4,313 11,137 13,535 8,555 22,090 21-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6,841 4,391 11,233 13,570 8,710 22,280 22-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,326 4,446 11,772 14,531 8,818 23,349 23-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,180 4,429 11,609 14,242 8,785 23,027 24-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7,149 4,488 11,638 14,181 8,902 23,083 25-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,815 4,392 10,207 11,535 8,711 20,246 26-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,840 4,408 10,248 11,583 8,743 20,326 27-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,643 4,381 10,024 11,192 8,690 19,882 28-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,481 4,372 9,852 10,871 8,671 19,542 29-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,442 4,417 9,859 10,794 8,762 19,556 

30-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,476 4,443 9,918 10,861 8,812 19,673 31-Aug-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5,911 4,394 10,305 11,725 8,715 20,440 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 45 12 57 XXXX 208,932 137,062 345,993 414,416 271,862 686,278 XX

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for August = 100

D

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined S
#### In the Matter of Abner Pollock, Petitioner, against Carroll E. Mealey et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York, Respondents.

All concur.
### **CHAPTER 27—BIPARTISAN CONGRESSIONAL TRADE PRIORITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY**

Sec.
4201.
Trade negotiating objectives.
4202.
Trade agreements authority.
4203.
Congressional oversight, consultations, and access to information.
4204.
Notice, consultations, and reports.
4205.
Implementation of trade agreements.
4206.
Treatment of certain trade agreements for which negotiations have already begun.
4207.
Sovereignty.
4208.
Interests of small businesses.
4209.
Application of certain provisions.
4210.
Definitions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 684

 374

 296

 256

 229

 219

 224

 242

 251

 248

 252

 296

 453

 354

 351

 228

 204

 205

 183

 179

 169

 185

 180

 197

 168

 144

 127

 126

 129

 130

 131

 235

 224

 215

 212

 207

 199

 200

 200

 203

 206

 208

 212

 214

 211

 205

 197

 191

 177

 171

 159

 157

 156

 158

 132

 116

 119

 119

 121

 123

 126

 127

 312

 257

 237

 223

 213

 208

 210

 213

 221

 224

 231

 233

 265

 241

 233

 209

 197

 188

 176

 168

 162

 162

 165

 151

 131

 127

 122

 123

 125

 128

 129

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,523

 3,539

 3,529

 3,481

 3,452

 3,423

 3,398

 3,366

 3,353

 3,338

 3,328

 3,291

 3,307

 3,288

 3,209

 3,161

 3,121

 3,086

 3,049

 3,009

 2,961

 2,910

 2,854

 2,781

 2,681

 2,575

 2,432

 2,314

 2,206

 2,125

 2,057

 252

 253

 252

 249

 247

 245

 243

 240

 240

 238

 238

 235

 236

 235

 229

 226

 223

 220

 218

 215

 212

 208

 204

 199

 192

 184

 174

 165

 158

 152

 147

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Elmer N. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. Warren L. GARRETT, Appellee.

No. 12469.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 2, 1955.

Decided May 19, 1955.

Mr. Albert J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James J. Laughlin, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Messrs. G. A. Chadwick, Jr., Washington, D. C., and John A. Beck, Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant lost his suit for personal injuries. He appeals solely on the ground that the court’s “instructions to the jury completely vitiated any meaning to the theory of last clear chance * * We think the instructions were clearly correct.

Affirmed.
Summary: No Evidence Former BLM Surveyor Violated 

Post-Employment Ethics Rules 

Report Date: December 29, 2020 Report Number: 19-0483 

The OIG investigated an allegation that a former Bureau of Land Management (BLM) surveyor 

violated ethics rules by representing his current employer in matters on which he personally and 

substantially worked while at the BLM. 

We did not find evidence that the former employee violated post-Government employment ethics 

laws or engaged in any conduct that could be construed as representing his current employer in 

matters related to the survey at issue. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the BLM’s Deputy Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

September 2013

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW dat Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Tota

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Fe

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,334 4,207 9,541 10,579 8,342-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,903 4,198 9,102 9,726 8,32

3-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,989 3,572 8,562 9,896 7,08

4-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,319 3,300 8,619 10,550 6,545-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,136 3,316 8,453 10,188 6,576-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,801 3,308 8,109 9,523 6,56

7-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,770 3,888 7,658 7,477 7,71

8-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,772 4,179 7,952 7,482 8,29

9-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,961 4,206 8,166 7,856 8,34

10-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,070 4,200 7,270 6,090 8,33

11-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,845 3,662 6,507 5,643 7,26

12-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,450 3,400 5,850 4,860 6,74

13-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,001 3,414 5,415 3,968 6,77

14-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,001 2,862 4,862 3,968 5,67

15-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,588 2,623 4,211 3,150 5,20

16-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,863 2,614 4,477 3,696 5,18

17-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,506 2,620 5,126 4,970 5,19

18-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,111 2,607 5,718 6,171 5,17

19-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,885 2,620 5,505 5,723 5,19

20-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,569 2,613 5,181 5,095 5,18

21-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 2,551 3,171 5,722 5,060 6,29

22-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,396 3,401 5,797 4,753 6,74

23-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,425 2,800 6,225 6,794 5,55

24-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,423 2,589 7,012 8,773 5,13

25-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,038 2,762 6,801 8,010 5,47

26-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,997 3,351 7,348 7,928 6,64

27-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,439 3,327 5,766 4,837 6,59

28-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,492 3,302 5,793 4,942 6,54

29-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,900 3,307 5,206 3,768 6,55

30-Sep-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,909 3,308 5,217 3,786 6,56

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 4 4 XXXX 0 0 98,443 98,725 197,168 195,262 195,82

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Preliminary

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Tracy
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald A. Wright, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Aerospace &
Electronics, Inc., a Washington corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

Date: August 21, 2003

/s/ Donald A. Wright
--------------------
DONALD A. WRIGHT, PRESIDENT AND CEO

                                      105
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-920 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Signed at Vienna September 20, 2010 

with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna September 20, 2010; 

 Entered into force September 20, 2010. 

 With annexes.
### §2576. General

#### (a) No bar to engaging in standards activity

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed—

(1) to prohibit a Federal agency from engaging in activity related to standards-related measures, including any such measure relating to safety, the protection of human, animal, or plant life or health, the environment or consumers; or

(2) to limit the authority of a Federal agency to determine the level it considers appropriate of safety or of protection of human, animal, or plant life or health, the environment or consumers.

#### (b) Exclusion

This subpart does not apply to—

(1) technical specifications prepared by a Federal agency for production or consumption requirements of the agency; or

(2) sanitary or phytosanitary measures under subpart 1.

(Pub. L. 96–39, title IV, §471, as added Pub. L. 103–182, title III, §351(a), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2120.)
Exhibit No. 32.1



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Service Attendants,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger E. Pawson,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


January 14, 2005                           By: /s/Roger E. Pawson
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Roger E. Pawson
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer



------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7276** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RICO JARUIASE JOY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 01317

- TLW

- 6; 4:14

- cv - 02187

- TLW )

Submitted : October 16, 2014 Decided: October 22 , 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Rico Jaruiase Joy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding p recedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rico Jaruiase Joy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satis fies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2 003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U. S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Joy has not made the requisite showing. The district c ourt lacked jurisdiction to consider Joy’s motion to vacate because it was a successive and unauthorized § 2255 motion. In t he absence of pre

- filing authorization from this court, the district court lacks jurisdiction to hear a successive § 22553 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Moran, Respondent, against Moran Transportation Lines et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur. ■
<PAGE>



                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-56610) pertaining to shares of common
stock IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, (b) Amendment No.
1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-38649) pertaining to the 1989
Incentive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus, (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-72008) pertaining
to the 1991 Executive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. and in the
related Prospectus, (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-37035)
pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan of IMPCO Technologies, Inc.
and (e) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-62889) pertaining to the
IMPCO Investment and Tax Savings Plan, of our report dated June 30, 1999 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended April 30, 1999.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Long Beach, California
July 27, 1999
### §2155. Destruction of national-defense materials, national-defense premises, or national-defense utilities

(a) Whoever, with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense of the United States, willfully injures, destroys, contaminates or infects, or attempts to so injure, destroy, contaminate or infect any national-defense material, national-defense premises, or national-defense utilities, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and, if death results to any person, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in subsection (a) of this section.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 799; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1261, title I, §104, 68 Stat. 1218; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500; Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, §810(e), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 380.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 105 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense (Apr. 20, 1918, ch. 59, §5, as added Nov. 30, 1940, ch. 926, 54 Stat. 1221).

Words "upon conviction thereof" were omitted as unnecessary, since punishment cannot be imposed until a conviction is secured.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–56 substituted "20 years" for "ten years" and inserted ", and, if death results to any person, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life" before period at end.

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted ", or" for "or" in section catchline.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, inserted conspiracy provisions.
### §1646. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §646, 46 Stat. 762, related to tenure and retirement of judges of United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. See sections 213, 371, and 372 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.