Date: May 8, 2012 

Subject: Recommendations Concerning Residual Risk Remodeling for the Pulp and 

Paper Industry 

EPA Contract No. EP-D-11-084; Work Assignment No. 0-03 

From: Thomas Holloway 

To: John Bradfield, Bill Schrock, Kelley Spence, and Nick Swanson 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

I. Background 

Under section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is directed to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to 

maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional or more 

stringent standards beyond those originally promulgated are needed to reduce any residual risk 

remaining after promulgation. The EPA is directed to conduct the section 112(f)(2) residual risk 

review 8 years after promulgation of the original standards. The national emissions standards for 

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the pulp and paper industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S) 

were originally promulgated on April 15, 1998. Subpart S amendments that addressed the 

residual risk assessment required for the pulp and paper industry were proposed in the Federal 

Register on December 27, 2011. Final amendments to subpart S are required to be signed by the 

EPA Administrator by July 31, 2012. 

Data from a CAA section 114 information collection request (ICR) sent to the pulp and 

paper industry were used for the residual risk assessment. The second part of the ICR (Part II), 

which concluded in June 2011, was targeted towards facilities that are major sources of 

hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, and involved an update of pre-populated National 

Emissions Inventory (NEI) data spreadsheets (or creation of new NEI data sets). The response 

rate for Part II of EPA’s ICR was 100 percent, with respondents submitting NEI spreadsheets for 

171 major sources. 

Substantial quality assurance (QA) efforts were conducted on the Part II data in order to 

create the modeling files needed for the residual risk assessment. Modeling files were needed for 

both the subpart S category (MACT code 1626-1) and the whole facility, so QA efforts focused 

on data for all emission sources at pulp and paper facilities. The QA of the inputs to the residual 

risk modeling file was documented in a November 11, 2011 memorandum entitled, Inputs to the 

Pulp and Paper Industry October 2011 Residual Risk Modeling.

1

Using these modeling files, EPA conducted risk assessments that provided estimates of 

the following: 
2 

• The maximum individual risk (MIR) posed by the HAP emissions from the 171 pulp and 

paper mills in the source category, where MIR is defined as the risk associated with a 

lifetime of exposure at the highest concentration; 

• The distribution of cancer and non-cancer risks within the exposed populations; 

• The total cancer incidence; 

• Estimates of the maximum target organ-specific hazard index (TOSHI) for chronic 

exposures to HAP with the potential to cause chronic non-cancer health effects; 

• Worst-case screening estimates of hazard quotient (HQ) for acute exposures to HAP with 

the potential to cause non-cancer health effects; and 

• An evaluation of the potential for adverse environmental effects. 

The results of these risk assessments were presented in a December 2011 EPA document 

entitled, Draft Residual Risk Assessment for the Pulp & Paper Source Category.

2

II. Objective 

In the preamble to the December 27, 2011 subpart S proposal, EPA proposed that the 

risks from the pulp and paper source category are acceptable and concluded that the current 

subpart S rule protects public health with an ample margin of safety.3

 The EPA also solicited 

comment on the proposal, asking for any additional data that may help to reduce the uncertainties 

inherent in the risk assessments and other analyses.

4

 The EPA was specifically interested in 

receiving corrections to the mill-specific HAP emissions data used in the risk modeling, but also 

accepted revisions to mill-specific non-HAP emissions data, including revised data for criteria 

air pollutants (CAP) and total reduced sulfur (TRS). 

The mill-specific NEI emissions data were available for download on EPA’s Risk and 

Technology Review (RTR) web page at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rrisk/rtrpg.html; the NEI 

data files included detailed information for each HAP emissions release point for each facility 

included in the subpart S source category.4

Commenters on the subpart S proposal (e.g., industry, states) were asked to determine 

whether any of the NEI data were unrepresentative or inaccurate and to submit their comments 

on the data downloaded from the RTR web page.4 Specifically, commenters were asked to enter 

suggested revisions to the NEI data fields appropriate for that information, gather documentation 

for any suggested emissions revisions (e.g., performance test reports, material balance 

calculations), and send the downloaded file with suggested revisions and all accompanying 

documentation to the docket for the subpart S amendments (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–

2007–0544).4 The NEI data fields that could be revised included those listed in Table 1 at the 

end of this memorandum.4

The objective of this memorandum is to document the review of the NEI data revisions 

received from the pulp and paper industry, evaluate which revisions could increase or decrease 

the risk associated with a particular facility, and recommend whether risk remodeling for the 

subpart S category should be conducted for any of the facilities based on these findings. 

III. Review of NEI Data Revisions 

An estimated 81 facilities provided NEI data revisions, out of 171 major source facilities 

in the source category, for a response rate of nearly 50 percent, and 53 of 68 facilities with 
3 

cancer risk at or above 1 in a million provided NEI revisions, for a response rate of nearly 80 

percent. Most NEI data revisions were received after proposal, but there were some late NEI 

data revisions received prior to proposal that were not incorporated into the pre-proposal risk 

modeling file, which we have now included with the post-proposal revisions. 

The facilities made a variety of revisions to their NEI data, including, but not limited to: 

• Deleting emission units (e.g., shutdown units, units with emissions collected and emitted 

elsewhere, causticizing systems using fresh water/no pulping condensates, units 

consolidated elsewhere in the inventory, fugitive sources changed to stack sources, paper 

machines reconfigured from a single emission point to wet/dry end emission points or 

multiple vents); 

• Replacing emission units (e.g., consolidated units, stack sources changed from fugitive 

sources, reconfigured paper machines); 

• Adding emission units omitted from previous inventory (e.g., wastewater treatment 

plant); 

• Deleting individual records (e.g., duplicates, zero emissions); 

• Correcting source classification codes (SCCs); 

• Changing release point IDs; 

• Correcting release point type from fugitive to stack; 

• Deleting pollutants (e.g., hexachloroethane [HCE] from washers/bleach plants, 

chlorinated compounds at unbleached mills, biphenyl from recycle paper machines, oxylene double-counted with total xylenes, o-cresol double-counted with total cresols); 

• Adding pollutants omitted from previous inventory; 

• Revising routine annual emissions data (e.g., based on updated emission factors/test data, 

corrected emissions calculations); 

• Deleting/replacing routine annual emissions data with updated/corrected data; 

• Revising maximum hourly emissions data; 

• Revising MACT code; 

• Providing stack parameters for newly designated stack sources; 

• Correcting stack parameters; 

• Replacing incorrect fugitive parameters; and 

• Correcting latitudes/longitudes. 

A. QA of NEI Data Revision Spreadsheets 

The first step in our review was to QA the aforementioned changes in the individual NEI 

data revision spreadsheets received from the pulp and paper industry. Table 2 at the end of this 

memorandum lists the NEI data fields we reviewed in each spreadsheet and provides some 

examples of the type of review we conducted. The risk inputs memo1

 was used as a guide to 

ensure that the changes commenters made were consistent with prior modeling inputs. 

We added an “RTI Notes” column at the end of each facility’s NEI data revisions 

spreadsheet that (1) noted our recommendations regarding the facility’s suggested NEI data 

revisions and rationale (e.g., OK to add/delete/revise record to correct error, update data, replace 

data); and (2) noted our own revisions (e.g., adding default stack parameters, calculating flow 

rates, correcting errors, filling data gaps, adding data from facilities’ previous inventory updates). 
4 

Where we made revisions, we highlighted those spreadsheet cells in yellow to distinguish them 

from the revisions made by the facilities. 

B. Completion of Review Checklists 

After we had completed our QA of each facility’s NEI data revisions spreadsheet, we 

filled out a review checklist for each facility that documented whether the NEI data revisions 

could be expected to increase or decrease the risk for that facility, to assist in developing our 

recommendations whether to remodel for risk for the subpart S category. See Appendix A for a 

blank copy of the NEI data revisions review checklist that was used. The review checklist 

includes the following items: 

• Risk results from EPA’s December 2011 risk report for each facility for the subpart S 

category and facility-wide, including chronic cancer MIR, chronic non-cancer maximum 

hazard index (HI), and acute non-cancer HQ reference exposure level (REL);2 for each 

facility, we included only those HQ(REL) values above 0.1, unless the highest HQ(REL) 

for the facility was below 0.1, in which case we included the highest HQ(REL) value for 

that facility; 

• Facility information, including mill name, city, state, NEI ID, RTI facility ID; 

• Format of the NEI data revision provided by the facility, including whether the revision 

was provided as a spreadsheet or written comment, whether the revision was submitted 

before proposal, and whether the revision was a resubmittal of a prior inventory; 

• Table of changes that may increase risk for subpart S pulp and paper production sources 

(MACT code 1626-1), subpart MM chemical recovery sources (MACT code 1626-2), 

and facility-wide sources, including: 

o Reductions in stack/fugitive release height, fugitive area (length x width), stack 

temperature, exit gas velocity, and/or exit gas flow rate; 

o Additions or increases in emissions of key risk driver pollutants and other HAP; 

o Addition of emission units; and 

o Change in release point type from stack to fugitive or from vertical to 

horizontal/gooseneck/etc.; 

• Table of changes likely to reduce risk for the same aforementioned sources, including 

(conversely): 

o Increases in stack/fugitive release height, fugitive area (length x width), stack 

temperature, exit gas velocity, and/or exit gas flow rate; 

o Deletions or reductions in emissions of key risk driver pollutants and other HAP; 

o Deletion of emission units; and 

o Change in release point type from fugitive to stack or from horizontal/gooseneck/ 

etc. to vertical; 

• Table of changes with an unknown effect on risk on the aforementioned sources, 

including: 

o Changes in latitude and longitude; 

o Changes in fugitive angle; and 
5 

o Other changes listed on a site-specific basis (e.g., change in stack diameter, 

receptor location); 

• List of other types of changes, including mill names, IDs, codes, descriptions; and 

• Any other notes from RTI pertinent to the review. 

We checked off each box in the review checklist that applied and also provided some 

additional information to assist in our later recommendations concerning risk remodeling for the 

subpart S category. Specifically, we listed on the checklist any of the key HAP risk driver 

pollutants whose emissions were increased, reduced, or deleted in the NEI data revision 

spreadsheets. Based on our review of the chronic cancer/non-cancer and acute non-cancer risk 

results, we considered the key HAP risk driver pollutants to be acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, 

HCE, naphthalene, chloroform, methanol, and metals. We also listed on the checklist the 

emission units from which the relevant pollutants were emitted. In addition, we listed on the 

checklist any emission units that were added or deleted from the spreadsheets and their 

associated risk driver pollutants. We also calculated the HAP emissions reductions/increases 

associated with the aforementioned changes and then calculated the net change in facility HAP 

emissions for subpart S sources, subpart MM sources, and facility-wide, as applicable. 

C. Risk Remodeling Recommendations 

To facilitate our development of recommendations concerning residual risk remodeling 

for the subpart S processes at each facility, we consolidated the information from the review 

checklists for the 81 facilities that submitted NEI data revisions into a single summary 

spreadsheet, provided as Appendix B at the end of this memorandum. We added the following 

additional columns to the spreadsheet to help us in our recommendations: 

• Two columns including information summarized by the pulp and paper industry’s 

consultant AECOM, listing the risk drivers for facilities with chronic cancer risk over 2 

in a million, specifically the pollutants considered risk drivers and the sources from 

which the pollutants are emitted (e.g., wastewater, papermaking, pulping);5

• One column noting whether facilities submitted comments about incorrect receptor 

locations at their facilities; 

• One column providing our recommendations about whether to remodel risk for subpart S 

processes at each facility (Yes, No, Maybe) and one column listing the reasons why or 

why not; 

• One column providing the baseline HAP emissions in tons per year (tpy) for subpart S 

processes for each facility from the NEI data files on the RTR web page; 

• One column providing the estimated net change in HAP emissions in tpy relative to 

baseline for subpart S processes for each facility that can be used to support our 

recommendations concerning remodeling of risk for subpart S processes; and 

• One column providing the estimated percent change in HAP emissions relative to 

baseline for subpart S processes for each facility that can also be used to support our 

recommendations concerning remodeling of risk for subpart S processes. 

Where facilities made the types of NEI data revisions that could reduce risk, we 

attempted to link those changes to the chronic cancer risk driver information from AECOM5

 and 
6 

the acute non-cancer risk information from EPA’s December 2011 risk report2 by highlighting 

the relevant cells in yellow, to directly show where the NEI data revisions are expected to reduce 

risk. 

After populating the summary spreadsheet with the aforementioned information from the 

review checklists, AECOM, and EPA risk report, we sorted the spreadsheet by chronic cancer 

risk, from highest to lowest. Then, for each facility that submitted NEI data revisions, we made 

recommendations whether to remodel risk for subpart S processes based on (1) the level of 

chronic cancer and acute non-cancer risk from subpart S processes at the facility, reported in the 

EPA risk report2; (2) the NEI data revisions that were made; and (3) the net change in HAP 

emissions for subpart S processes. The development of our recommendations did not include 

chronic non-cancer risk from subpart S sources, since it was low—below a HI of 1—for all 

facilities. Table 3 at the end of this memorandum presents our facility-specific recommendations 

whether to remodel risk for subpart S processes. Our recommendations were premised on EPA’s 

finding in the December 27, 2011 subpart S proposed amendments that the risks from the pulp 

and paper source category, as modeled prior to proposal, are acceptable.3 Therefore, as long as 

the risk for subpart S processes at an individual facility is not expected to be substantially 

increased as a result of the facility’s NEI data revisions, we do not recommend remodeling risk 

for the subpart S processes at that facility. 

Specifically, for facilities with chronic cancer MIR values above 1 in a million and acute 

non-cancer HQ(REL) values above 1, we recommend no risk remodeling of subpart S processes 

if the facilities provided NEI data revisions that would be expected to either reduce risk or result 

in no significant change to risk for subpart S processes. It follows that any facilities with lower 

MIR or HQ(REL) values is also not recommended for risk remodeling. 

Only three facilities’ NEI data revisions increased the overall HAP emissions from their 

subpart S processes. The net HAP emissions increase for subpart S processes at two of the 

facilities was minimal (approximately 3 tpy at each facility), so any increase in risk was expected 

to be minor. While the net HAP emissions increase for subpart S processes at the third facility 

was substantial (a twofold increase of 308 tpy), 98 percent of the added HAP emissions can be 

attributed to methanol; less than 6 tons of HAP emissions can be attributed to the other risk 

driver pollutants (e.g., acetaldehyde, formaldehyde). The chronic cancer MIR values for subpart 

S processes at all three facilities were at or below 1 in a million, and the highest acute non-cancer 

HQ(REL) values for subpart S processes at all three facilities were below 1, so any increase in 

risk for these three facilities is not expected to result in a high risk result. Therefore, we do not

recommend risk remodeling for subpart S processes at these three facilities. 

A fourth facility, which consists of three plants—a pulp mill, paper mill, and water 

quality center, each with its own NEI ID—had a minimal HAP emissions increase for its pulp 

mill, but the HAP emissions reductions at the water quality center at the facility far exceeded this 

small emissions increase; there were no NEI data revisions for the paper mill. Based on these 

findings, we do not recommend risk remodeling for the subpart S processes at this facility. Note: 

For facilities that did not provide NEI data revisions, we also do not recommend risk remodeling 

for subpart S processes because there are no new data that would alter the risks modeled prior to 

proposal. 
7 

Nine facilities provided stack or fugitive parameter revisions that could potentially 

increase risk for the subpart S category. However, these changes were (1) countered by other 

changes that could potentially reduce risk (e.g., additional stack/fugitive parameter changes, 

HAP emissions reductions, changes to release point type or equipment configuration) or (2) were 

not expected to have a significant effect because the risk estimates for the facilities were very 

low (i.e., chronic cancer MIR below 1 in a million and highest acute non-cancer HQ(REL) 

below 1) and because there was no increase in HAP risk driver emissions for the subpart S 

processes at these facilities. Therefore, we also do not recommend risk remodeling for the 

subpart S processes at these facilities. 

 In summary, based on EPA’s current cancer and non-cancer risk estimates for the pulp 

and paper industry and our review of the NEI data revisions received from the industry, we do 

not recommend risk remodeling for the subpart S category for any of the major source facilities 

in this industry. 

IV. References 

1. Memorandum from Thomas Holloway, Katie Hanks, Corey Gooden, and Matt Hakos, 

RTI, to J. Bradfield and B. Schrock, EPA. Inputs to the Pulp and Paper Industry 

October 2011 Residual Risk Modeling. November 11, 2011. 

2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Draft Residual Risk Assessment for the Pulp & 

Paper Source Category. December 2011. 

3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry, Proposed Rule. 76 FR 81344. December 

27, 2011. 

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry, Proposed Rule. 76 FR 81349-51. 

December 27, 2011. 

5. Comment submitted by Paul Noe, Vice President for Public Policy, American Forest and 

Paper Association (AF&PA). RE: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007-0544, National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry (76 

Federal Register 81328, December 27, 2011). Attachment 1: Review of the HEM3 

Modeling Conducted by EPA for the Pulp & Paper Industry RTR by David Heinold, 

AECOM (February 2012), Table 2. February 27, 2012.
8 

Table 1. NEI Data Fields for Revision 

Data element Definition 

Control Measure Are control measures in place? (yes or no). 

Control Measure Comment Select control measure from list provided, and briefly describe the control 

measure. 

Delete Indicate here if the facility or record should be deleted. 

Delete Comment Describes the reason for deletion. 

Emissions Calculation Method 

Code For Revised Emissions 

Code description of the method used to derive emissions. For example, 

CEMS, material balance, stack test, etc. 

Emissions Process Group Enter the general type of emissions process associated with the specified 

emissions point. 

Fugitive Angle Enter release angle (clockwise from true North); orientation of the ydimension relative to true North, measured positive for clockwise starting at 0 

degrees (maximum 89 degrees). 

Fugitive Length Enter dimension of the source in the east-west (x-) direction, commonly 

referred to as length (ft). 

Fugitive Width Enter dimension of the source in the north-south (y-) direction, commonly 

referred to as width (ft). 

Malfunction Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to malfunctions (tpy). 

North American Datum Enter datum for latitude/longitude coordinates (NAD27 or NAD83); if left 

blank, NAD83 is assumed. 

Process Comment Enter general comments about process sources of emissions. 

REVISED Address Enter revised physical street address for MACT facility here. 

REVISED City Enter revised city name here. 

REVISED County Name Enter revised county name here.

REVISED Emissions Release Point 

Type 

Enter revised Emissions Release Point Type here. 

REVISED End Date Enter revised End Date here. 

REVISED Exit Gas Flow Rate Enter revised Exit Gas Flowrate here (ft3/sec). 

REVISED Exit Gas Temperature Enter revised Exit Gas Temperature here (°F). 

REVISED Exit Gas Velocity Enter revised Exit Gas Velocity here (ft/sec). 

REVISED Facility Category Code Enter revised Facility Category Code here, which indicates whether facility is 

a major or area source. 

REVISED Facility Name Enter revised Facility Name here. 

REVISED Facility Registry 

Identifier 

Enter revised Facility Registry Identifier here, which is an ID assigned by the 

EPA Facility Registry System. 

REVISED HAP Emissions 

Performance Level Code 

Enter revised HAP Emissions Performance Level here.

REVISED Latitude Enter revised Latitude here (decimal degrees). 

REVISED Longitude Enter revised Longitude here (decimal degrees). 

REVISED MACT Code Enter revised MACT Code here. 

REVISED Pollutant Code Enter revised Pollutant Code here. 

REVISED Routine Emissions Enter revised routine emissions value here (tpy). 

REVISED SCC Code Enter revised SCC Code here. 

REVISED Stack Diameter Enter revised Stack Diameter here (ft). 

REVISED Stack Height Enter revised Stack Height here (ft). 

REVISED Start Date Enter revised Start Date here. 

REVISED State Enter revised State here. 

REVISED Tribal Code Enter revised Tribal Code here.

REVISED Zip Code Enter revised Zip Code here. 

Shutdown Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to shutdown events (tpy). 

Stack Comment Enter general comments about emissions release points. 

Startup Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to startup events (tpy). 

Year Closed Enter date facility stopped operations.
9 

Table 2. NEI Data Fields Revieweda

Data field Example review 

SCC Code Determined whether SCC code change was valid, based on type of pulping process 

and emission unit description in risk modeling file. 

Emission Release Point ID Determined whether revisions of release point ID could result in duplicate records. 

Emission Release Point 

Type 

Determined whether revision of release point type was valid, based on stack 

parameters provided by facility (e.g., release point changed from fugitive to stack, but 

the stack diameter was greater than the stack height). 

Pollutant Code Generally accepted facilities’ pollutant codes, pending review of a compilation of NEI 

data revisions for all 81 facilities reporting.b

 Checked for any data gaps. Determined 

whether the deletion of a pollutant was valid (e.g., facility wanted to delete pollutant 

that is not emitted, but the original pollutant code was incorrect, resulting in the 

incorrect pollutant being assigned; so, a change in pollutant code and pollutant fixed 

the problem). 

Routine Emissions Generally accepted facilities’ rationale and revisions of emissions data, pending 

review of a compilation of NEI data revisions for all 81 facilities reporting.b When 

facilities assigned a value of zero to emissions but did not mark the record for 

deletion, we made a note in the spreadsheet that the record should be deleted. Also, 

for one facility, we included emissions data from their pre-proposal inventory 

revisions that were not included in any post-proposal revisions. 

Max Hourly Emissions Generally accepted the few facilities’ rationale and revisions of maximum hourly 

emissions data. 

MACT Code Determined whether the revised MACT code corresponded to the type of emission 

unit identified by SCC code (e.g., lime kiln should be assigned to 1626-2). 

Stack Height Reviewed revised stack height values provided by industry to ensure that stack height 

was always greater than stack diameter for stack emission points. Added 

SCC/MACT code default stack heights when facilities changed release point type 

from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwide default stack height of 10 feet. 

Exit Gas Temperature Added SCC/MACT code default exit gas temperature values when facilities changed 

release point type from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwide default exit gas 

temperature of 72°F. 

Stack Diameter Added SCC/MACT code default stack diameter values when facilities changed 

release point type from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwide default stack 

diameter of 0.003 feet. 

Exit Gas Velocity Added SCC/MACT code default stack diameter values when facilities changed 

release point type from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwide default exit gas 

velocity of 0.0003 feet per second. Where there were revised values for stack 

diameter and flow rate (e.g., from facility and/or SCC/MACT code defaults), 

calculated velocity as “flow rate/(π × (diameter/2)2].” 

Exit Gas Flow Rate Added SCC/MACT code default exit gas flow rate values when facilities changed 

release point type from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwide default stack 

diameter, exit gas velocity, and exit gas flow rate from their respective national 

default values. Where there were revised values for stack diameter and exit gas 

velocity (e.g., from facility and/or SCC/MACT code defaults), calculated exit gas 

flow rate as “velocity × π × (diameter/2)2

.” 

Fugitive Length Reviewed fugitive length values to determine whether any revisions were made 

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correct error). Deleted fugitive length values 

when facility changed release point type from fugitive to stack. 

Fugitive Width Reviewed fugitive width values to determine whether any revisions were made 

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correct error). Deleted fugitive width values 

when facility changed release point type from fugitive to stack. 

Fugitive Angle Reviewed fugitive angle values to determine whether any revisions were made 

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correct error). Deleted fugitive angle values 

when facility changed release point type from fugitive to stack. 

Latitude Generally accepted facilities’ revision of latitude (e.g., to correct error), pending a 
10 

Data field Example review 

more in-depth review similar to the QA conducted pre-proposal. 

Longitude Generally accepted facilities’ revision of longitude (e.g., to correct error), pending a 

more in-depth review similar to the QA conducted pre-proposal. 

a

 For new/replacement records added by facilities, we checked the accuracy of all fields in the table. 

b

 Pollutant codes and emission rates will be rechecked for consistency across all facilities upon compilation of the 

revised nationwide NEI file.
11 

Table 3. Recommendations Concerning Risk Remodeling

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI32869A Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Hawesville KY 1.21E‐05 0.17 <1 No Emission

driver posources esubpart S 

NEI18334 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Pennington AL 1.04E‐05 0.20 5.67 (formaldehyde) 

4.91 (methanol) 

4.66 

(acetaldehyde) 

2.91 (chloroform) 

No Changes 

stack paremission reductionpollutantsubpart S 

NEI40648 SP Newsprint 

Co. 

Newberg OR 9.01E-06 0.44 3.17 (chloroform) No No NEI 

NEI40282 Blue Ridge 

Paper Products Inc. 

Canton NC 8.98E‐06 0.29 <1 No Net emis

risk drivto reduce 

NEIWI7720116, 

NEI46739, & 

NEI42963 

NewPage Corporation 

Wisconsin Rapids 

WI NEIWI7720116:

8.51E‐06 

NEI46739: 

4.00E-07 

NEI42963: 

1.56E-07 

NEIWI7720116:

0.41 

NEI46739: 

0.05 

NEI42963: 

0.00 

NEIWI7720116:

4.29 

(acetaldehyde) 

3.43 (methanol) 

3.12 (chloroform)

1.38 

(formaldehyde) 

No Net emis

risk drivfacility esubpart S reduction NEIWI7emissionlow-risk 

NEIME0250002 Madison Paper 

Co. 

Madison ME 7.58E‐06 0.31 1.57 

(acetaldehyde) 

1.32 

(formaldehyde) 

No Changes 

stack parreduction pollutantsubpart S 

NEI42695 Domtar 

Corporation 

Nekoosa WI 7.42E‐06 0.29 <1 No Removal 

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI41552 Packaging 

Corp. of America 

Counce TN 7.14E‐06 0.36 2.12 

(acetaldehyde) 

No Changes 

stack pardriver po
12 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

net emispollutant subpart S 

NEI6057 Graphic 

Packaging International, Inc. 

West Monroe LA 5.27E-06 0.22 <1 No No NEI 

NEI47091 Buckeye 

Technologies Inc. 

Perry FL 5.22E‐06 0.16 1.68 (chloroform) No Removal 

multiple risk for s

NEI40600 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Toledo OR 4.94E‐06 0.15 <1 No Replacem

stack recof risk drexpected category 

NEI46835 Woodland 

Pulp LLC 

Baileyville ME 4.86E-06 0.20 15.2 

(acetaldehyde) 

1.40 (chloroform) 

No No NEI 

NEI43207 Appleton 

Coated L.L.C. 

Combined Locks 

WI 4.32E-06 0.22 <1 No No NEI 

NEI13363 Simpson 

Tacoma Kraft Co 

Tacoma WA 4.30E‐06 0.07 4.62 

(formaldehyde) 

No Emission

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI41314 International 

Paper Co. 

Georgetown SC 4.25E‐06 0.16 <1 No Removal 

risk drivmultiple risk for s

NEI42211 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Big Island VA 4.25E‐06 0.20 1.29 (acetaldehyde) No No revis

lat/longs for subpaunchang

NEI7104 Appleton Roaring 

Spring 

PA 4.09E‐06 0.07 <1 No Changes 

reduce ri
13 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI40686 Domtar 

Corporation 

Johnsonburg PA 3.85E‐06 0.07 <1 No Removal 

pollutantexpected category 

NEI33135 & 

NEI706 

NewPage Corporation 

Luke MD NEI33135: 

3.77E‐06 

NEI706: 

4.65E-07 

NEI33135: 

0.14 

NEI706: 

0.01 

<1 No Changes 

stack paremission reduction expected category 

NEI41599 Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Kingsport TN 3.62E‐06 0.14 1.09 

(acetaldehyde) 

No Net emis

risk drivmultiple risk for s

NEI8178 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Rincon GA 3.34E‐06 0.06 <1 No Net emis

risk drivmultiple risk for s

NEI8196 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Brunswick GA 3.27E‐06 0.14 1.98 (acetaldehyde) No Change i

stack parreduction pollutantsubpart S 

NEI6450 MeadWestvaco Evadale TX 3.25E‐06 0.09 1.20 (acetaldehyde) 

1.03 (chloroform) 

No Change i

net emispollutantsubpart S 

NEI26495 TIN Inc., dba 

Temple-Inland 

Rome GA 3.18E‐06 0.09 <1 No No revis

in receptsubpart S unchang

NEI42357 Port Townsend 

Paper Corp. 

Port Townsend 

WA 3.10E-06 0.18 <1 No Change i

emissionpollutant subpart S 
14 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI18660 Domtar 

Industries 

Ashdown AR 3.04E‐06 0.08 <1 No Emission

driver posources esubpart S 

NEIIL0215971 Ahlstrom 

Filtration LLC 

Taylorville IL 3.00E-06 0.15 <1 No No NEI 

NEI45182 International 

Paper Co. 

Springfield OR 2.80E‐06 0.05 <1 No Emission

driver/otreduce ri

NEI47104 KapStone Roanoke 

Rapids 

NC 2.73E‐06 0.12 9.32 

(acetaldehyde) 

1.48 

(formaldehyde) 

No Changes 

stack parrisk for s

NEI12407 Verso Paper 

Corp. 

Sartell MN 2.72E‐06 0.09 <1 No Removal 

reduce ri

NEI40247 International 

Paper Co. 

Riegelwood NC 2.69E‐06 0.09 <1 No Removal 

emissiondriver/otreduce ri

NEI759 MeadWestvaco Covington VA 2.62E‐06 0.08 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI8560 International 

Paper Co. 

Prattville AL 2.58E‐06 0.10 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI42482 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Green Bay WI 2.46E‐06 0.03 <1 No Net emis

pollutant subpart S 

NEIVA00022 Greif Inc. Amherst VA 2.32E-06 0.10 <1 No No NEI 

NEI34030 UPM, Blandin 

Paper Co. 

Grand Rapids MN 2.30E‐06 0.04 <1 No Change i

configurend) and expected 
15 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

category 

NEI8278 Rock-Tenn Co. Panama City FL 2.28E-06 0.07 <1 No Changes 

stack pardriver/otsources esubpart S 

NEI11610 Rock-Tenn Co. Cincinnati OH 2.27E-06 0.05 <1 No Changes 

parametefor subpa

NEI6261 Verso Paper 

Corp. 

Jay ME 2.22E‐06 0.12 <1 No Emission

driver/otreduce ri

NEI43472 Sonoco 

Products Co. 

Hartsville SC 2.19E-06 0.11 1.32 

(acetaldehyde) 

No No NEI 

NEI33883 NewPage 

Corporation 

Escanaba MI 2.04E‐06 0.12 <1 No Emission

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI8186 International 

Paper Co. 

Savannah GA 2.00E‐06 0.03 1.57 

(formaldehyde)) 

No Removal 

dmissionpollutantsubpart S 

NEI26476 Weyerhaeuser 

Co. 

Port Wentworth 

GA 1.91E-06 0.10 1.09 

(acetaldehyde) 

No No NEI 

NEI41565 AbitibiBowater 

Inc. 

Calhoun TN 1.89E-06 0.13 1.27 (chloroform) No No NEI 

NEI40738 Proctor & 

Gamble Paper Products Co. 

Mehoopany PA 1.86E-06 0.06 <1 No Removal 

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI11251 International 

Paper Co. 

Valliant OK 1.84E-06 0.06 <1 No Changes 

and remoexpected category 
16 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI11172 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Monticello MS 1.71E-06 0.06 <1 No Emission

pollutant subpart S 

NEI54342 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Crossett AR 1.68E-06 0.06 <1 No Changes 

stack parrisk for s

NEI26581 Clearwater 

Paper Corp. 

Lewiston ID 1.49E-06 0.03 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI34066 GeorgiaPacific Corp. New Augusta MS 1.44E-06 0.04 <1 No Change i

removal expected category 

NEI11367 Ahlstrom 

Filtration LLC 

Madisonville KY 1.42E-06 0.16 2.07 

(formaldehyde) 

1.18 (methanol) 

No No NEI 

NEI18658 Evergreen 

Packaging 

Pine Bluff AR 1.39E-06 0.22 2.9 (chloroform) No Emission

driver/otreduce ri

NEI7181 Glatfelter Spring Grove PA 1.35E-06 0.05 <1 No Removal 

multiple risk for s

NEI34070 International 

Paper Co. 

Redwood MS 1.32E-06 0.04 <1 No Change i

configurend) and of some emissionreduce ri

NEI13340 Pope & Talbot 

Inc. 

Halsey OR 1.29E-06 0.14 4.67 

(formaldehyde) 

2.57 

(acetaldehyde) 

1.58 (methanol) 

No No NEI 

NEI26526 Rayonier Inc. Jesup GA 1.28E-06 0.13 <1 No No NEI 
17 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI54400 Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Rothschild WI 1.18E-06 0.04 <1 No Emission

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI8265 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Palatka FL 1.16E-06 0.03 <1 No Removal 

pollutantsubpart S 

NEI42341B North Pacific 

Paper Corp. (Norpac) 

Longview WA 1.15E-06 0.03 <1 No No NEI 

NEI33025 or 

NEW71411 

International Paper Co. 

Campti LA 1.10E-06 0.04 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI33023 Rock-Tenn Co. Hodge LA 1.10E-06 0.03 <1 No Change i

stack parreductioncresol, chchlorinatrisk for s

NEI46814 TIN Inc., dba 

Temple-Inland 

Bogalusa LA 1.10E-06 0.03 <1 No No NEI 

NEI6273 NewPage 

Corporation 

Rumford ME 1.09E-06 0.04 <1 No Minimal 

subpart S risk for sto be minsubpart S cancer Hincrease result in 

NEI46599 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Camas WA 1.05E-06 0.03 <1 No Changes 

stack parreductionpollutantsubpart S 

NEI8619 International Pine Hill AL 1.04E-06 0.04 <1 No Removal 
18 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

Paper Co. expected 

category 

NEI42254 Rock-Tenn Co. West Point VA 1.02E-06 0.05 <1 No Changes 

stack parbiphenylmultiple risk for s

NEI47074 Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Bennettsville SC 1.02E-06 0.03 <1 No Changes 

stack parfugitive rstack recfor subpa

NEI26491 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Cedar Springs GA 9.95E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI 

NEI8261 Rock-Tenn Co. Fernandina 

Beach 

FL 9.31E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal 

chlorinatsources esubpart S 

NEI26309 International 

Paper Co. 

Cantonment FL 9.23E-07 0.04 <1 No Change i

removal expected category 

NEI45206 Weyerhaeuser 

Co. 

Vanceboro NC 8.85E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal 

multiple risk for s

NEI41252 KapStone North 

Charleston 

SC 8.85E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI 

NEI7559 Boise Inc. DeRidder LA 8.80E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI 

NEI33013 International 

Paper Co. 

Mansfield LA 8.44E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI11461 Rock-Tenn Co. Coshocton OH 8.18E-07 0.04 <1 No Removal 

sources e
19 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

subpart S 

NEI33945 Packaging 

Corp. of America 

Filer City MI 8.16E-07 0.04 <1 No Emission

driver/otreduce ri

NEI40554 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Clatskanie OR 8.00E-07 0.01 <1 No Changes 

stack parrisk for s

NEI26504 Packaging 

Corp. of America 

Clyattville GA 7.94E-07 0.03 <1 No No revis

risk for sto be unc

NEI18335 International 

Paper Co. 

Selma AL 7.69E-07 0.05 <1 No Removal 

risk drivreduce ri

NEI11338 NewPage 

Corporation 

Wickliffe KY 7.44E-07 0.03 <1 No No revis

risk for sto be unc

NEI46852 Green Bay 

Packaging Inc. 

Morrilton AR 7.35E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI 

NEI18390 AbitibiBowater 

Inc. 

Coosa Pines AL 6.85E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI 

NEI23 Halltown 

Paperboard Co. 

Halltown WV 6.53E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42341A Weyerhaeuser 

Co. 

Longview WA 6.47E-07 0.07 4.03 (chloroform) No Net emis

pollutant subpart S 

NEI46817 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Zachary LA 6.43E-07 0.02 1.03 (acetaldehyde) No Removal 

expected category 

NEI47077 AbitibiBowater 

Inc. 

Catawba SC 6.42E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI 

NEI26471 Graphic 

Packaging 

Macon GA 6.28E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 
20 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

International, Inc. 

NEI33103 Red Shield 

Environmental 

Old Town ME 5.54E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mosinee WI 5.50E-07 0.10 <1 No No NEI NEI46866 TIN Inc., dba 

Temple-Inland 

Waverly TN 5.40E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42486 Green Bay 

Packaging Inc. 

Green Bay WI 5.12E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI6175 Hollingsworth 

& Vose Co. 

West Groton MA 5.08E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI26382 Rayonier Inc. Fernandina 

Beach 

FL 5.05E-07 0.02 1.10 (chloroform) No No NEI 

NEI42329 Nippon Paper 

Industries USA Co., Ltd. 

Port Angeles WA 5.05E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42338 Longview 

Fibre Co. 

Longview WA 5.02E-07 0.03 1.46 

(formaldehyde) 

No Emission

driver/otreduce ri

NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Cottonton AL 4.77E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI 

NEI9201 Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Plymouth NC 4.73E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI 

NEI41628 International 

Paper Co. 

Queen City TX 4.52E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal 

risk drivreduce ri

NEI12411 Boise Inc. International 

Falls 

MN 4.44E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI 

NEI18338 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Brewton AL 4.31E-07 0.01 <1 No Large ne

subpart S the adde(only 5.7 
21 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

driver pofor subpanon-cancany increresult in 

NEI18357 International 

Paper Co. 

Courtland AL 4.29E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal 

expected category 

NEI26514 International 

Paper Co. 

Augusta GA 4.17E-07 0.02 <1 No Changes 

removal risk drivreduce ri

NEI34064 Weyerhaeuser 

Co. 

Columbus MS 3.90E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI 

NEI12492 TIN Inc., dba 

Temple-Inland 

Orange TX 3.83E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI33118 Sappi Fine 

Paper North America 

Skowhegan ME 3.83E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI18657 Delta Natural 

Kraft 

Pine Bluff AR 3.70E-07 0.01 8.54 (1,2-

dimethoxyethane) 

2.75 

(formaldehyde) 

No No NEI 

NEIMA10626 Onyx Specialty 

Papers 

South Lee MA 3.62E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI18347 Rock-Tenn Co. Stevenson AL 3.57E-07 0.02 1.00 

(acetaldehyde) 

No Changes 

removal HAPs froto reduce 

NEI208 Bear Island 

Paper Co., LLC 

Ashland VA 3.54E-07 0.02 4.16 (chloroform) No No NEI 
22 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI46760 International 

Paper Co. 

Eastover SC 3.49E-07 0.07 <1 No Removal 

risk drivreduce ri

NEI43202 Wausau Paper Rhinelander WI 3.35E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI8601 Boise Inc. Jackson AL 2.93E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI18373 Alabama River 

Cellulose 

Perdue Hill AL 2.92E-07 0.01 1.53 

(acetaldehyde) 

No Emission

pollutant subpart S 

NEI33887 Verso Paper 

Corp. 

Quinnesec MI 2.88E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42317 Rock-Tenn Co. Hopewell VA 2.83E-07 0.01 <1 No Changes 

stack parxylene amultiple risk for s

NEI26487 Proctor & 

Gamble Paper Products Co. 

Albany GA 2.79E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI45474 Rock-Tenn Co. Demopolis AL 2.77E-07 0.11 1.93 (chlorine) No Removal 

driver/otsources esubpart S 

NEI42710 Thilmany 

Papers, LLC 

Kaukauna WI 2.73E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI8122 Augusta 

Newsprint Co. 

Augusta GA 2.62E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42730 Fraser Papers 

Inc. 

Park Falls WI 2.40E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 
23 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEIWI4050324 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Green Bay WI 2.18E-07 0.14 <1 No Small ne

subpart S added poacetate (reduced acetaldehcancer M<<1E-6, HQ(RELis not exresult 

NEI33981 Domtar Paper 

Company LLC 

Port Huron MI 2.13E-07 0.01 <1 No No revis

risk for sto be unc

NEI42410 Boise Inc. Wallula WA 1.93E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEIMN14904 NewPage 

Corporation 

Duluth MN 1.89E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI39968 Finch Paper 

LLC 

Glens Falls NY 1.86E-07 0.14 <1 No No NEI 

NEI13216 Catalyst Paper Snowflake AZ 1.76E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI NEI12368 Sappi Fine 

Paper North America 

Cloquet MN 1.73E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI26506 Weyerhaeuser 

Co. 

Oglethorpe GA 1.59E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI11108 AbitibiBowater 

Inc. 

Grenada MS 1.57E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42495 Thilmany 

Papers, LLC 

De Pere WI 1.51E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI12980 GeorgiaPacific Corp. Muskogee OK 1.49E-07 0.01 <1 No Minor ch

for two rhave minsubpart S 
24 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI33104 Lincoln Paper 

and Tissue 

Lincoln ME 1.48E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42800 Shawano 

Specialty Papers 

Shawano WI 1.47E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42690 Wausau Paper Brokaw WI 1.45E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI NEI18652 Clearwater 

Paper Corp. 

McGehee AR 1.29E-07 0.05 <1 No No revis

risk for sto be unc

NEI35908 International 

Paper Co. 

Ticonderoga NY 1.17E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal 

risk drivreduce ri

NEIWI7500086 

& NEIWIT$8597 

NewPage Corporation 

Stevens Point WI NEIWI7500086:

1.13E-07 

NEIWIT$8597: 

0.00E+00 

NEIWI7500086:

0.01 

NEIWIT$8597: 

0.00 

<1 No No NEI 

NEIWI0793640 Wisconsin 

Paperboard Corp. 

Milwaukee WI 1.12E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI7933 Rock-Tenn Co. Florence SC 1.08E-07 0.00 <1 No Changes 

stack parcresol, oother chlsources esubpart S 

NEI8177 Interstate 

Paper L.L.C. 

Riceboro GA 1.07E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI6284 Verso Paper 

Corp. 

Bucksport ME 1.05E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI46750 Packaging 

Corp. of America 

Tomahawk WI 9.83E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 
25 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI34020 Wausau Paper Brainerd MN 9.79E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI NEI11602 Graphic 

Packaging International, Inc. 

Middletown OH 7.40E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEIPA1013489 Newman & 

Co., Inc. 

Philadelphia PA 7.36E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI2INT16350 Temple-Inland Cayuga IN 6.75E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEITN1050093 KimberlyClark 

Worldwide, Inc. 

Loudon TN 6.34E-08 0.01 5.24 (chloroform) No No NEI 

NEI11645 Appleton West 

Carrollton 

OH 6.13E-08 0.07 1.90 (chloroform) No No NEI 

NEI11600 Smart Papers 

L.L.C. 

Hamilton OH 5.51E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI36019 Knowlton 

Technologies, LLC 

Watertown NY 5.18E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEICT3102 Cascades 

Boxboard 

Versailles CT 5.01E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEIWI4710355 SCA Tissue 

North America, L.L.C. 

Menasha WI 4.43E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42961 NewPage 

Corporation 

Wisconsin Rapids 

WI 4.32E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEW73505 Republic 

Paperboard Co. 

Lawton OK 4.22E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI40488 Glatfelter Chillicothe OH 3.76E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEIGAT$3911 SP Newsprint East Dublin GA 3.39E-08 0.02 <1 No No NEI 
26 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

Co. 

NEI33866 Neenah Paper, 

Inc. 

Munising MI 2.45E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI7106 American 

Eagle Paper Mills Inc. 

Tyrone PA 1.40E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI33950 Menominee 

Paper Co. /Cellu Tissue 

Menominee MI 8.45E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI40720 PaperWorks 

Industries, Inc. 

Philadelphia PA 7.58E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI26304 Rock-Tenn Co. Jacksonville FL 4.13E-09 0.00 <1 No Removal 

methylenchlorinatsources esubpart S 

NEINY5532600 Hollingsworth 

& Vose Co. 

Greenwich NY 1.44E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI40553 Boise Inc. St Helens OR 4.20E-10 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEINY5533400 Hollingsworth 

& Vose Co. 

Easton NY 3.12E-10 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI2WAT18798 Ponderay 

Newsprint Co. 

Usk WA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI42385 KimberlyClark 

Worldwide, Inc. 

Everett WA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEIGAT$3909 Hollingsworth 

& Vose Co. 

Hawkinsville GA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI 

NEI33072 Sappi Fine 

Paper North America 

Westbrook ME -- -- -- No No HAP 

to model 
27 

Survey NEI 

Company 

name Mill city 

Mill 

state 

Subpart S category risk 

ReCancer MIR model? 

Chronic non- cancer max HIa

Acute noncancer max 

HQ(REL)b

NEI33986 Manistique 

Papers Inc. 

Manistique MI -- -- -- No No HAP 

to model 

NEIMA131179 Hollingsworth 

& Vose Co. 

East Walpole MA -- -- -- No No HAP 

to model 

NEIWA0270002 Grays Harbor 

Paper, LLC 

Hoquiam WA -- -- -- No Not mod

a Chronic non-cancer max HI results are low (<1) for all mills, so HI values were not considered in the risk remodeling evaluation. Note: HI values of 

less than 0.005 (i.e., cannot be rounded to 0.01). 

b Acute non-cancer HQ(REL) results are available for multiple pollutants. Note: Table only includes specific HQ(REL) values above 1.
Appendix A. NEI Data Revisions Review Sheet 

A-1 

 Source category Facility-Wide 

Chronic cancer MIR _______ _______ 

Chronic non-cancer max HI _______ _______ 

Acute non-cancer max HQ REL _______ _______ 

NEI code: ____________ RTI code: ______ 

Mill name (city and state): ___________________________________________________ 

Format of NEI revision (check one): 

__Spreadsheet __Resubmittal of prior inventory in its entirety 

__Written comment __Other (specify) _______________ 

__Submitted before proposal 

Changes That May Increase Risk (check all that apply) 

Type of change in inventory revision 

Subpart S 

(1626-1 Sources) 

Subpart MM 

(1626-2 Sources) 

Facilitywide 

sources 

Reduced stack/fugitive release height

Reduced fugitive area (l x w)

Increased emissions of key risk driver pollutants 

(> 1 tpy increase)* 

Increased emissions of other HAP less likely to 

be risk drivers (> 10 tpy increase) 

Reduced stack gas temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity or flow

Added rows with add’l HAP emission unit(s)

Added rows with add’l HAPs (particularly risk 

drivers) for previously reported emission units* 

Changed emission release point type from stack 

to fugitive, vertical to horizontal, gooseneck, etc 

*acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, hexachloroethane, naphthalene, chloroform, methanol, metals 

Changes Likely to Reduce Risk (check all that apply) 

Type of change in inventory revision 

Subpart S 

(1626-1 Sources) 

Subpart MM 

(1626-2 Sources) 

Facilitywide 

sources 

Increased stack/fugitive release height

Increased fugitive area (l x w)

Reduced emissions of key risk driver pollutants 

(> 1 tpy decrease)* 

Reduced emissions of other HAP less likely to be 

risk drivers (> 10 tpy decrease) 

Increased stack gas temperature

Increased stack gas velocity or flow

Deleted rows of HAP emission unit(s)

Deleted rows of HAPs (particularly risk drivers) 

for previously reported emission units* 
Appendix A. NEI Data Revisions Review Sheet 

A-2 

Type of change in inventory revision 

Subpart S 

(1626-1 Sources) 

Subpart MM 

(1626-2 Sources) 

Facilitywide 

sources 

Changed emission release point type from 

fugitive to stack, horizontal/gooseneck/etc. to 

vertical 

*acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, hexachloroethane, naphthalene, chloroform, methanol, metals 

Changes with Unknown Affect on Risk 

Type of change in inventory revision 

Subpart S 

(1626-1 Sources) 

Subpart MM 

(1626-2 Sources) 

Facilitywide 

sources 

Changes in lat/long coordinates

Change in fugitive angle

Other types of changes (list):

__Mill name 

__NEI ID 

__SIC code 

__SCCs 

__Emission unit description 

__Emission unit ID 

__Process ID 

__Emission release point ID 

__MACT code 

__Control measure code/description 

Notes: 
Appendix B. Summary of Review of NEI Data Revisions

Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

NEI32869A 109 0177 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Hawesville KY Yes Yes 1.21E‐05 HCE (80%) Kraft Pulp Storage 

NEI18334 186 0197 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Pennington AL Yes Yes 1.04E‐05 Acetaldehyde (18%), 

Formaldehyde (17%), 

Carbon tetrachloride (14%), Naphthalene (13%)

Kraft Pulping: EvapoLVHC, Kraft Pulping: Tanks HVLC, Wastew(Kraft), Kraft PulpingWashing, Kraft PulpiDecker, Bleaching: K

NEI40648 410 SP Newsprint Co. Newberg OR No No 9.01E‐06 Acetaldehyde (70%), 

Naphthalene (18%)

Paper Stock Prep 

NEI40282 206 0174 Blue Ridge Paper Products 

Inc.

Canton NC Yes Yes 8.98E‐06 Acetaldehyde (44%), 

Formaldehyde (32%)

Papermaking, Kraft PO2 delignification HV

NEIWI7720116, 

NEI46739, & 

NEI42963

154 0182 NewPage Corporation Wisconsin 

Rapids

WI Yes Yes NEIWI7720116:

8.51E‐06

NEI46739:

4.00E‐07

NEI42963:

1.56E‐07

Acetaldehyde (79%), Formaldehyde (12%)

Wastewater (Kraft) 

NEIME0250002 363 0205 Madison Paper Co. Madison ME Yes Yes 7.58E‐06 Naphthalene (60%), 

Acetaldehyde (23%)

Mechanical Pulping 

NEI42695 617 0180 Domtar Corporation Nekoosa WI Yes Yes 7.42E‐06 Beryllium compounds 

(84%)

Kraft Pulping: DigestLVHC

Survey NEI

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

B‐1
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI41552 142 Packaging Corp. of America Counce TN Yes Yes 7.14E‐06 Acetaldehyde (98%) Wastewater (Kraft) 

NEI6057 181 Graphic Packaging 

International, Inc.

West Monroe LA No No 5.27E‐06 Acetaldehyde (59%), 

Naphthalene (21%)

Papermaking, Paper Prep

NEI47091 606 Buckeye Technologies Inc. Perry FL Yes Yes 5.22E‐06 HCE (78%) Kraft Pulping: Washi

Bleaching: Kraft

NEI40600 188 0209 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Toledo OR Yes Yes 4.94E‐06 Acetaldehyde (33%), 

Formaldehyde (12%), 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane (11%), Tetrachloroethene (10%)

Papermaking, Kraft PBL Tanks HVLC, NSSC Pulping

NEI46835 195 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME No No 4.86E‐06 Acetaldehyde (74%), 

Naphthalene (16%)

Wastewater (Kraft) 

NEI43207 526 Appleton Coated L.L.C. Combined Locks WI No No 4.32E‐06 Acetaldehyde (90%) Papermaking NEI13363 133 0147 Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co Tacoma WA Yes Yes 4.30E‐06 Formaldehyde (71%), 

Acetaldehyde (18%)

Papermaking 

NEI41314 166 0190 International Paper Co. Georgetown SC Yes Yes 4.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (39%), HCE 

(25%)

Kraft Pulping: DeckeBleaching: Kraft, Causticizing: Slaker, Wastewater (Kraft), Pulping: LVHC

NEI42211 187 0189 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Big Island VA Yes Yes 4.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (83%) Papermaking, Semic

Pulping

NEI7104 207 0226 Appleton Roaring Spring PA Yes Yes 4.09E‐06 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 

(45%), Carbon tetrachloride (20%)

Bleaching: Kraft 

B‐2
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI40686 100 0175 Domtar Corporation Johnsonburg PA Yes Yes 3.85E‐06 HCE (50%), Acetaldehyde 

(22%), Formaldehyde (18%)

Bleaching: Kraft, Causticizing: Misc & Mud

NEI33135 & NEI706 145 NewPage Corporation Luke MD Yes Yes NEI33135:

3.77E‐06

NEI706:

4.65E‐07

Acetaldehyde (29%), 

Carbon tetrachloride (21%), Formaldehyde (14%)

Kraft Pulping: Decke

NEI41599 106 0185 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Kingsport TN Yes Yes 3.62E‐06 HCE (50%), Acetaldehyde 

(42%)

Bleach Plant, Wastew

NEI8178 430 0206 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Rincon GA Yes Yes 3.34E‐06 Acrylonitrile (66%), 

Acetaldehyde (21%)

Papermaking, WasteGeneral

NEI8196 243 0210 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Brunswick GA Yes Yes 3.27E‐06 Acetaldehyde (73%) Wastewater: Kraft NEI6450 147 MeadWestvaco Evadale TX Yes Yes 3.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (47%), 

Formaldehyde (29%)

Papermaking 

NEI26495 120 0190 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Yes Yes 3.18E‐06 Formaldehyde (42%), 

Acetaldehyde (42%)

Papermaking 

B‐3
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI42357 139 Port Townsend Paper Corp. Port Townsend WA Yes Yes 3.10E‐06 Acetaldehyde (97%) Wastewater: Kraft NEI18660 196 0202 Domtar Industries Ashdown AR Yes Yes 3.04E‐06 Formaldehyde (35%), 

Acetaldehyde (33%), HCE (30%)

Kraft Pulping, PapermBleaching

NEIIL0215971 511 Ahlstrom Filtration LLC Taylorville IL No No 3.00E‐06 Acetaldehyde (100%) Papermaking 

NEI45182 105 0190 International Paper Co. Springfield OR Yes Yes 2.80E‐06 Formaldehyde (75%), 

Acetaldehyde (16%)

Kraft Pulping: DigestLVHC

NEI47104 176 0193 KapStone Roanoke Rapids NC Yes Yes 2.73E‐06 Acetaldehyde (86%) Papermaking NEI12407 229 0183 Verso Paper Corp. Sartell MN Yes Yes 2.72E‐06 Cadmium (26%), 

Formaldehyde (20%), Nickel (13%), Acetaldehyde (13%), Arsenic (13%)

Kraft Pulping: IncineMechanical Pulping, Papermaking

NEI40247 174 0190 International Paper Co. Riegelwood NC Yes Yes 2.69E‐06 Acetaldehyde (40%), 

Formaldehyde (38%), HCE (19%)

Kraft Pulping: WashiBleaching: Kraft, KraPulping: Digester LVH

NEI759 146 MeadWestvaco Covington VA Yes Yes 2.62E‐06 Acetaldehyde (40%), 

Carbon tetrachloride (19%), Formaldehyde (19%), 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane (14%)

Kraft Pulping (DigestLVHC, Knotter), Wastewater

NEI8560 163 0190 International Paper Co. Prattville AL Yes Yes 2.58E‐06 Acetaldehyde (68%), 

Formaldehyde (26%)

Wastewater, Paperm

NEI42482 436 0169 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Green Bay WI Yes Yes 2.46E‐06 Formaldehyde (87%) Bleaching 

NEIVA00022 304 Greif Inc. Amherst VA No No 2.32E‐06 Acetaldehyde (79%), 

Benzene (21%)

Papermaking, SemicPulping

B‐4
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI34030 118 0199 UPM, Blandin Paper Co. Grand Rapids MN Yes Yes 2.30E‐06 Naphthalene (57%), 

Formaldehyde (20%)

Papermaking 

NEI8278 124 Rock‐Tenn Co. Panama City FL Yes Yes 2.28E‐06 HCE (27%), Acetaldehyde 

(20%), Formaldehyde (14%), Tetrachloroethane (10%)

Bleaching, Kraft PulpWashing, PapermakiCausticizing

NEI11610 301 Rock‐Tenn Co. Cincinnati OH Yes Yes 2.27E‐06 Naphthalene (43%), 

Acetaldehyde (29%), Formaldehyde (28%)

Papermaking 

NEI6261 610 0184 Verso Paper Corp. Jay ME Yes Yes 2.22E‐06 Acetaldehyde (67%), 

Naphthalene (27%)

Wastewater, Mechapulping, Papermakin

NEI43472 244 Sonoco Products Co. Hartsville SC No No 2.19E‐06 Acetaldehyde (100%) Papermaking NEI33883 155 0192 NewPage Corporation Escanaba MI Yes Yes 2.04E‐06 Acetaldehyde (49%), 

Formaldehyde (27%), 

Naphthalene (14%)

Wastewater treatme

NEI8186 531 0190 International Paper Co. Savannah GA Yes Yes 2.00E‐06 Formaldehyde (72%), 

Acetaldehyde (13%)

Kraft Pulping: LVHC, Wastewater

NEI26476 115 Weyerhaeuser Co. Port Wentworth GA No No 1.91E‐06 

NEI41565 198 AbitibiBowater Inc. Calhoun TN No No 1.89E‐06 NEI40738 389 0179 Proctor & Gamble Paper 

Products Co.

Mehoopany PA Yes Yes 1.86E‐06 

NEI11251 104 0190 International Paper Co. Valliant OK Yes Yes 1.84E‐06 

NEI11172 613 0217 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Monticello MS Yes Yes 1.71E‐06 

B‐5
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI54342 189 0194 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Crossett AR Yes Yes 1.68E‐06 

NEI26581 137 0155 Clearwater Paper Corp. Lewiston ID Yes Yes 1.49E‐06 NEI34066 242 0181/0191 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. New Augusta MS Yes Yes 1.44E‐06 NEI11367 512 Ahlstrom Filtration LLC Madisonville KY No No 1.42E‐06 

NEI18658 171 0187 Evergreen Packaging Pine Bluff AR Yes Yes 1.39E‐06 

NEI7181 182 0201 Glatfelter Spring Grove PA Yes Yes 1.35E‐06 

NEI34070 167 0190 International Paper Co. Redwood MS Yes Yes 1.32E‐06 

NEI13340 140 Pope & Talbot Inc. Halsey OR No No 1.29E‐06 

NEI26526 240 Rayonier Inc. Jesup GA No No 1.28E‐06 NEI54400 365 0151 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Rothschild WI Yes Yes 1.18E‐06 

NEI8265 525 0203 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Palatka FL Yes Yes 1.16E‐06 

NEI42341B 371 North Pacific Paper Corp. 

(Norpac)

Longview WA No No 1.15E‐06 

B‐6
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI33025 or 

NEW71411

108 0190 International Paper Co. Campti LA Yes Yes 1.10E‐06 

NEI33023 226 Rock‐Tenn Co. Hodge LA Yes Yes 1.10E‐06 NEI46814 119 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Bogalusa LA No No 1.10E‐06 

NEI6273 150 0159 NewPage Corporation Rumford ME Yes Yes 1.09E‐06 

NEI46599 185 0188 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Camas WA Yes Yes 1.05E‐06 

NEI8619 116 0190 International Paper Co. Pine Hill AL Yes Yes 1.04E‐06 

NEI42254 131 Rock‐Tenn Co. West Point VA Yes Yes 1.02E‐06 

B‐7
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI47074 107 0204 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Bennettsville SC Yes Yes 1.02E‐06 

NEI26491 190 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Cedar Springs GA No No 9.95E‐07 

NEI8261 132 Rock‐Tenn Co. Fernandina 

Beach

FL Yes Yes 9.31E‐07 

NEI26309 178 0190 International Paper Co. Cantonment FL Yes Yes 9.23E‐07 

NEI45206 111 0154 Weyerhaeuser Co. Vanceboro NC Yes Yes 8.85E‐07 NEI41252 151 KapStone North Charleston SC No No 8.85E‐07 

NEI7559 201 Boise Inc. DeRidder LA No No 8.80E‐07 

NEI33013 169 0190 International Paper Co. Mansfield LA Yes Yes 8.44E‐07 

NEI11461 128 Rock‐Tenn Co. Coshocton OH Yes Yes 8.18E‐07 NEI33945 247 Packaging Corp. of America Filer City MI No No 8.16E‐07 NEI40554 615 0211 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Clatskanie OR Yes Yes 8.00E‐07 NEI26504 143 0200 Packaging Corp. of America Clyattville GA Yes Yes 7.94E‐07 

B‐8
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI18335 172 0190 International Paper Co. Selma AL Yes Yes 7.69E‐07 

NEI11338 152 0166 NewPage Corporation Wickliffe KY Yes Yes 7.44E‐07 NEI46852 340 Green Bay Packaging Inc. Morrilton AR No No 7.35E‐07 

NEI18390 199 AbitibiBowater Inc. Coosa Pines AL No No 6.85E‐07 

NEI23 339 Halltown Paperboard Co. Halltown WV No No 6.53E‐07 

NEI42341A 102 Weyerhaeuser Co. Longview WA Yes Yes 6.47E‐07 

NEI46817 184 0198 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Zachary LA Yes Yes 6.43E‐07 

NEI47077 200 AbitibiBowater Inc. Catawba SC No No 6.42E‐07 NEI26471 180 Graphic Packaging 

International, Inc.

Macon GA No No 6.28E‐07 

NEI33103 183 Red Shield Environmental Old Town ME No No 5.54E‐07 NEI42689 117 Wausau Paper Mosinee WI No No 5.50E‐07 NEI46866 122 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Waverly TN No No 5.40E‐07 NEI42486 341 Green Bay Packaging Inc. Green Bay WI No No 5.12E‐07 

NEI6175 514 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. West Groton MA No No 5.08E‐07 

NEI26382 241 Rayonier Inc. Fernandina 

Beach

FL No No 5.05E‐07 

NEI42329 414 Nippon Paper Industries 

USA Co., Ltd.

Port Angeles WA No No 5.05E‐07 

NEI42338 156 0158 Longview Fibre Co. Longview WA Yes Yes 5.02E‐07 

NEI46931 148 MeadWestvaco Cottonton AL No No 4.77E‐07 

NEI9201 103 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Plymouth NC No No 4.73E‐07 

NEI41628 165 0190 International Paper Co. Queen City TX Yes Yes 4.52E‐07 

NEI12411 202 Boise Inc. International 

Falls

MN No No 4.44E‐07 

B‐9
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI18338 130 0186 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Brewton AL Yes Yes 4.31E‐07 

NEI18357 600 0190 International Paper Co. Courtland AL Yes Yes 4.29E‐07 

NEI26514 175 0190 International Paper Co. Augusta GA Yes Yes 4.17E‐07 

NEI34064 112 Weyerhaeuser Co. Columbus MS No No 3.90E‐07 

NEI12492 121 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX No No 3.83E‐07 NEI33118 135 Sappi Fine Paper North 

America

Skowhegan ME No No 3.83E‐07 

NEI18657 197 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR No No 3.70E‐07 

NEIMA10626 425 Onyx Specialty Papers South Lee MA No No 3.62E‐07 

NEI18347 245 Rock‐Tenn Co. Stevenson AL Yes Yes 3.57E‐07 

NEI208 409 Bear Island Paper Co., LLC Ashland VA No No 3.54E‐07 

NEI46760 162 0190 International Paper Co. Eastover SC Yes Yes 3.49E‐07 NEI43202 216 Wausau Paper Rhinelander WI No No 3.35E‐07 

NEI8601 205 Boise Inc. Jackson AL No No 2.93E‐07 

NEI18373 208228535 0178 Alabama River Cellulose Perdue Hill AL Yes Yes 2.92E‐07 NEI33887 177 Verso Paper Corp. Quinnesec MI No No 2.88E‐07 NEI42317 126 Rock‐Tenn Co. Hopewell VA Yes Yes 2.83E‐07 NEI26487 391 Proctor & Gamble Paper 

Products Co.

Albany GA No No 2.79E‐07 

B‐10
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI45474 179 Rock‐Tenn Co. Demopolis AL Yes Yes 2.77E‐07 NEI42710 164 Thilmany Papers, LLC Kaukauna WI No No 2.73E‐07 

NEI8122 232 Augusta Newsprint Co. Augusta GA No No 2.62E‐07 

NEI42730 192 Fraser Papers Inc. Park Falls WI No No 2.40E‐07 

NEIWI4050324 520 0169 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Green Bay WI Yes Yes 2.18E‐07 

NEI33981 468 0213 Domtar Paper Company 

LLC

Port Huron MI Yes Yes 2.13E‐07 

NEI42410 203 Boise Inc. Wallula WA No No 1.93E‐07 

NEIMN14904 368611 NewPage Corporation Duluth MN No No 1.89E‐07 

NEI39968 193 Finch Paper LLC Glens Falls NY No No 1.86E‐07 NEI13216 210 Catalyst Paper Snowflake AZ No No 1.76E‐07 NEI12368 136 Sappi Fine Paper North 

America

Cloquet MN No No 1.73E‐07 

NEI26506 114 Weyerhaeuser Co. Oglethorpe GA No No 1.59E‐07 

NEI11108 231 AbitibiBowater Inc. Grenada MS No No 1.57E‐07 NEI42495 500 Thilmany Papers, LLC De Pere WI No No 1.51E‐07 NEI12980 428 0173 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Muskogee OK Yes Yes 1.49E‐07 NEI33104 157 Lincoln Paper and Tissue Lincoln ME No No 1.48E‐07 NEI42800 375 Shawano Specialty Papers Shawano WI No No 1.47E‐07 NEI42690 215 Wausau Paper Brokaw WI No No 1.45E‐07 NEI18652 138 0176 Clearwater Paper Corp. McGehee AR Yes Yes 1.29E‐07 NEI35908 173 0190 International Paper Co. Ticonderoga NY Yes Yes 1.17E‐07 

NEIWI7500086 & 

NEIWIT$8597 

224 NewPage Corporation Stevens Point WI No No NEIWI7500086:

1.13E‐07

NEIWIT$8597:

0.00E+00

NEIWI0793640 254 Wisconsin Paperboard 

Corp.

Milwaukee WI No No 1.12E‐07 

B‐11
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI7933 127 Rock‐Tenn Co. Florence SC Yes Yes 1.08E‐07 NEI8177 159 Interstate Paper L.L.C. Riceboro GA No No 1.07E‐07 NEI6284 230 Verso Paper Corp. Bucksport ME No No 1.05E‐07 

NEI46750 141 Packaging Corp. of America Tomahawk WI No No 9.83E‐08 NEI34020 213 Wausau Paper Brainerd MN No No 9.79E‐08 NEI11602 288 Graphic Packaging 

International, Inc.

Middletown OH No No 7.40E‐08 

NEIPA1013489 322 Newman & Co., Inc. Philadelphia PA No No 7.36E‐08 

NEI2INT16350 315 Temple‐Inland Cayuga IN No No 6.75E‐08 

NEITN1050093 435 Kimberly‐Clark Worldwide, 

Inc.

Loudon TN No No 6.34E‐08 

NEI11645 451 Appleton West Carrollton OH No No 6.13E‐08 

NEI11600 373 Smart Papers L.L.C. Hamilton OH No No 5.51E‐08 NEI36019 433 Knowlton Technologies, LLC Watertown NY No No 5.18E‐08 

NEICT3102 275 Cascades Boxboard Versailles CT No No 5.01E‐08 

NEIWI4710355 382 SCA Tissue North America, 

L.L.C.

Menasha WI No No 4.43E‐08 

NEI42961 223 NewPage Corporation Wisconsin 

Rapids

WI No No 4.32E‐08 

NEW73505 311 Republic Paperboard Co. Lawton OK No No 4.22E‐08 

NEI40488 149 Glatfelter Chillicothe OH No No 3.76E‐08 

NEIGAT$3911 369 SP Newsprint Co. East Dublin GA No No 3.39E‐08 

NEI33866 403 Neenah Paper, Inc. Munising MI No No 2.45E‐08 

NEI7106 501 American Eagle Paper Mills 

Inc.

Tyrone PA No No 1.40E‐08 

NEI33950 423 Menominee Paper Co. / 

Cellu Tissue

Menominee MI No No 8.45E‐09 

NEI40720 290 PaperWorks Industries, Inc. Philadelphia PA No No 7.58E‐09 

B‐12
Cancer MIR

(Source: EPA risk 

report2)

Cancer risk driver (% of 

risk)

(Source: AECOM5)

Cancer risk driver (s

group)

(Source: AECOM

Survey NEI 

NEI revision 

reviewed (by 

Company name RTI)

NEI revision 

received (by 

Mill city Mill state RTI)

Subpart S categor

RTI code

Comment 

no.

NEI26304 289 Rock‐Tenn Co. Jacksonville FL Yes Yes 4.13E‐09 

NEINY5532600 508513 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Greenwich NY No No 1.44E‐09 

NEI40553 204 Boise Inc. St Helens OR No No 4.20E‐10 

NEINY5533400 496 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Easton NY No No 3.12E‐10 

NEI2WAT18798 370 Ponderay Newsprint Co. Usk WA No No 0.00E+00 

NEI42385 158 Kimberly‐Clark Worldwide, 

Inc.

Everett WA No No 0.00E+00 

NEIGAT$3909 516 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Hawkinsville GA No No 0.00E+00 

NEI33072 387 Sappi Fine Paper North 

America

Westbrook ME No No ‐‐ 

NEI33986 429 Manistique Papers Inc. Manistique MI No No ‐‐ 

NEIMA131179 515 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. East Walpole MA No No ‐‐ 

NEIWA0270002 518 Grays Harbor Paper, LLC Hoquiam WA No No ‐‐ 

171 81 81

Notes:a. Chronic non‐cancer max HI results are low (<1) for all mills, so HI values were not considered in the risk remodeling evaluation. Note: HI values of 0.00 simply mean that HI is less than 0.00b. Acute non‐cancer HQ(REL) results are available for multiple pollutants. Note: Table only includes HQ(REL) values above 0.1, unless highest HQ(REL) for a mill was below 0.1, in which case tc. Yellow‐shaded cells are used to link the risk data in this table to the cells in the table where facilities made NEI data revisions that could reduce risk.d. The total baseline number at the bottom of this table does not represent all mills (only those submitting NEI revisions); the total baseline including all mills is approximately 45,000 tpy.Acronyms/abbreviations:ASB = aerated stabilization basin HCE = hexachloroethane LVHC = low‐volume high‐concentration BL = black liquor HCl = hydrogen chloride MIBK = methyl isobutyl ketone BLO = black liquor oxidation HD = high‐density MIR = maximum individual risk BSW = brownstock washer HI = hazard index NCG = non‐condensable gas ClO2 = chlorine dioxide HQ(REL) = hazard quotient reference exposure level NDCE = nondirect‐contact evaporator Cr+6 = hexavalent chromium HVLC = high‐volume low‐concentration NEI = National Emissions Inventory CS2 = carbon disulfide lat/long = latitude/longitude NSSC = neutral sulfite semichemical EU = emission unit LD = low‐density O2 = oxygen HAP = hazardous air pollutant LK = lime kiln OCC = old corrugated cardboard 

B‐13
NEI32869A

NEI18334NEI40648NEI40282

NEIWI7720116, 

NEI46739, & 

NEI42963

NEIME0250002

NEI42695

Survey NEI Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

Reduced stack height for screens, lime mud filter, green liquor processing when changed their release point type from fugitive to stack

Increased formaldehyde, Cr+6, 2 other HAPs from recovery furnaceIncreased acetaldehyde, methanol, formaldehyde, metals, naphthalene, 5 other HAPs from SDT

Reduced velocity of NCG incineration

AA

NEI46739: Increased acetaldehyde, methanol, benzene, MIBK, toluene from causticizing misc

Reduced stack temp of boilers

Added replacement stack records for pressurized groundwood emission units (with lower emissions than records being replaced)

NEI revisions which may increase risk

B‐14
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI41552

NEI6057

NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211

NEI7104

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced stack height for paper machines (3 unique records)

Increased acetaldehyde from paper machines (2 records)

Reduced velocity of paper machines (3 unique records)

Added replacement stack records for BL tanks (2 unique records)

Increased acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene, metals, 29 other HAPs from RF, SDT, LKIncreased metals, HCl from boilers

Added replacement stack records for paper machines

A

B‐15
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI40686

NEI33135 & NEI706

NEI41599

NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450

NEI26495

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Atfc

Increased acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, toluene, biphenyl from decker

Added replacement (consolidated) records for paper machines

Ad

B‐16
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI42357NEI18660

NEIIL0215971

NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247

NEI759

NEI8560

NEI42482

NEIVA00022

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced fugitive area of ASB

AcAcA

B‐17
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI34030

NEI8278

NEI11610

NEI6261

NEI43472NEI33883

NEI8186

NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced stack height for mech pulping

Reduced stack velocity, flow for mech pulping

Added replacement records for paper machine wet/dry endAdded replacement records for paper machine for all 12 vents on machine

Increased methylene chloride from LVHC

Added replacement records for paper machine wet/dry end

Reduced fugitive area of WWT

B‐18
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658

NEI7181

NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400

NEI8265

NEI42341B

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced stack height of BL tanks Reduced fugitive area of BL 

tanks

Added replacement records for paper machine wet and dry end

B‐19
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI33025 or 

NEW71411

NEI33023NEI46814

NEI6273

NEI46599

NEI8619

NEI42254

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced fugitive area of primary clarifier, WWTP

Increased metals, PCB emissions from boilers

A

Increased acetaldehyde from paper machines, pulp dryer

Added replacement records and new records for boilers

As

B‐20
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI47074NEI26491

NEI8261

NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252

NEI7559

NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Added replacement stack records for green liquor processing, paper machinesAdded updated replacement records for PB5 and PB7 (increases emissions)Added replacement records for secondary clarifier and boiler

B‐21
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390

NEI23

NEI42341A

NEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103

NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486

NEI6175

NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931

NEI9201

NEI41628NEI12411

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Reduced fugitive area of WWT

Aas

B‐22
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657

NEIMA10626

NEI18347

NEI208

NEI46760NEI43202

NEI8601

NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Added ASB (acetaldehyde, CS2, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene)

Reduced fugitive area of WWTP6Reduced fugitive area for primary/ secondary clarifier

Added replacement records for primary/secondary clarifier, ASB

B‐23
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI45474NEI42710

NEI8122

NEI42730

NEIWI4050324

NEI33981NEI42410

NEIMN14904

NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908

NEIWI7500086 & 

NEIWIT$8597 

NEIWI0793640

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Ad

Reduced stack temp of boilers

Reduced velocity of Bleach Tower 1; flow unchanged

B‐24
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284

NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602

NEIPA1013489

NEI2INT16350

NEITN1050093

NEI11645

NEI11600NEI36019

NEICT3102

NEIWI4710355

NEI42961

NEW73505

NEI40488

NEIGAT$3911

NEI33866

NEI7106

NEI33950NEI40720

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

B‐25
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI26304

NEINY5532600

NEI40553

NEINY5533400

NEI2WAT18798

NEI42385

NEIGAT$3909

NEI33072NEI33986

NEIMA131179

NEIWA0270002

171

Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions

Reduced stack gas 

temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity 

or flow Added emission units 

NEI revisions which may increase risk

Added records for primary clarifier, ASB

4 7 8 2 4 15 

B‐26
NEI32869A

NEI18334NEI40648NEI40282

NEIWI7720116, 

NEI46739, & 

NEI42963

NEIME0250002

NEI42695

Survey NEI Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde from paper machines, pulp dryer

Depu

Increased stack height for SDT and multiple subpart S units (50) when changed their release point type from fugitive to stack

Reduced naphthalene from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene, phenol, other HAPs from deckerReduced acetaldehyde metals, methanol, naphthalene, 7 other HAPs from RFReduced chloroform, metals, 18 other HAPs from SDT

Increased stack temperature for SDT and multiple subpart S units (46) when changed their release point type from fugitive to stack

Increased stack velocity/flow for SDT and multiple subpart S units (55) (56 if include just stack flow of NCG incineration) when changed release point type

Deleted records for bleach plant, knotter, BSW, digester, screens (accounted for elsewhere) and decker, causticizing misc, lime mud washer (no longer in service) (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene)

DeDe

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde from paper machinesReduced 1,2‐dichloroethane from BSW

Defrobo

NEIWI7720116: Reduced acetaldehyde, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol, catechol, cresol, ethylene glycol, phenol from WWTNEI46739: Reduced chloroform, formaldehyde, 7 other HAPs from causticizing misc

NEtettriccau

Increased stack height of pressurized groundwood emission units when replaced them with stack equivalentsIncreased stack height of boilers

Increased stack temperature for pressurized groundwood emission units when replaced them with stack equivalents

Increased stack velocity/flow for pressurized groundwood emission units when replaced them with stack equivalentsIncreased stack velocity/flow of boilers

Deleted fugitive records for pressurized groundwood emission units (to be replaced with lower emission records for acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, naphthalene, etc.)

Dean

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

B‐27
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI41552

NEI6057

NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211

NEI7104

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Reduced acetaldehyde from paper machines (91 records) and ASB (1 record)

Increased velocity and flow of BL tanks (4 unique records)

Deleted fugitive records for BL tanks (to be replaced) (2 unique records)

DeWW

Reduced metals, chloroform, 11 other HAPs from RF, SDT, LKReduced metals from boilers

DeBS

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, 19 other HAPs from black liquor storage tanks

Deleted fugitive records for paper machines (to be replaced)

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde 

from WWT

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

DeDecauincDeWW

Increased stack height for bleach plant, deckers

Reduced metals from boiler De

CS

B‐28
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI40686

NEI33135 & NEI706

NEI41599

NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450

NEI26495

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

DeDechmecauDechmeoth

Increased stack heights for decker, knotter, pulp storage, black liquor tanks, causticizing when changed release point type

Reduced formaldehyde from white liquor processing

Increased stack temperature for decker, knotter, pulp storage, black liquor tanks, causticizing when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for decker, knotter, pulp storage, black liquor tanks, causticizing when changed release point type

Deleted records for BSW (emissions go to power boilers) (includes acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methanol, carbon tetrachloride)

Reduced acetaldehyde, methanol from WWTP1/2, formaldehyde from WWTP2

DeDechmeothDechmeoth

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, toluene, benzene, MIBK, CS2 from WWT, decker

Deleted unconsolidated records for paper machines (to be replaced)

DeWWpa

Increased stack heights for lime mud filter, lime slaker

Reduced acetaldehyde, naphthalene from WWT

Increased stack temperature for lime mud filter when changed its release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for lime mud 

filter when changed release point type

Defro

Increased fugitive area for WWT and paper machines

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde emissions from paper machines

B‐29
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI42357NEI18660

NEIIL0215971

NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247

NEI759

NEI8560

NEI42482

NEIVA00022

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Reduced acetaldehyde from ASBReduced acetaldehyde, metals, naphthalene from LKReduced arsenic from SDTReduced metals from boiler

Increased release temperature for ASB

Increased stack velocity for RF

DeacemeSD

Reduced acetaldehyde from O2 delignification

Deandry

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, and 16 other HAPs from digester chip bin and LVHC

Increased stack height when changed release point type for paper machines

Increased stack temperature for paper machines when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for paper machines when changed release point type

Deleted records for NCG incinerator (includes metals, formaldehyde, naphthalene)

Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, and 16 other HAPs from digester chip bin

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, naphthalene, methanol)

DeDe

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, naphthalene)Reduced formaldehyde from EU BLT12 (Bleach Tower 2)

DeBLTrepest

B‐30
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI34030

NEI8278

NEI11610

NEI6261

NEI43472NEI33883

NEI8186

NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Increased stack temperature for mech pulping

Increased stack velocity/flow for boilers

Deleted undifferentiated records for paper machine (to be replaced)

Increased stack velocity/flow for green liquor processing, black liquor tanks, pulp storage when changed release point type

DeDeplaBSDe

Increased stack height for sec fiber pulping, paper machines, space heaters when changed release point type

Increased stack temp for sec fiber pulping, paper machines, space heaters when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for sec fiber pulping, paper machines, space heaters when changed release point type

Deleted records for paper machine (to be replaced)

Reduced acetaldehyde, naphthalene, CS2, propionaldehyde from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, naphthalene from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, chloroform, methanol from LVHC

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, naphthalene)

Reduced nickel from paper machine De

me

fug

Increased stack height for paper machines

Increased fugitive area for WWT

Deleted undifferentiated records for paper machines (to be replaced)Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slakers (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

Reduced acetaldehyde from WWT

B‐31
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658

NEI7181

NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400

NEI8265

NEI42341B

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Increased stack height for causticizing (lime mud filter, lime slaker), pulp storage, BL tanks, decker

Increased stack temperature for causticizing, pulp storage, BL tanks, BSW, decker when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for causticizing, pulp storage, BL tanks, BSW, decker when changed release point type

DeanSD

Increased fugitive area for WWT

De

Reduced naphthalene, 10 other HAPs from bleach plant

DeplaDeLV

Increased stack height for paper machine when replaced paper machine records with separate wet/dry end records

Increased stack velocity/flow for paper machine when replaced paper machine records with separate wet/dry end records

Deleted undifferentiated records for paper machine (to be replaced)Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene, 15 other HAPs)

Reduced acetaldehyde, methanol from paper machine

DeanBL 

B‐32
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI33025 or 

NEW71411

NEI33023NEI46814

NEI6273

NEI46599

NEI8619

NEI42254

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

Reduced metals emissions from boilers Increased stack temp for 

stock chests when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for stock chests when changed release point type

DechpapustoDemaDeliqDe

Reduced acetaldehyde from WWT Deleted records for non‐

operational boiler

Defrodry

Reduced acetaldehyde, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene, 27 other HAPs from BSW, BL tanks

Increased stack temperature for BSW, SOG, pulp storage, O2 delignification, black liquor tanks, causticizing, bleach plant, knotter, sec fiber pulping when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for BSW, SOG, pulp storage, O2 delignification, black liquor tanks, causticizing, bleach plant, knotter, sec fiber pulping when changed release point type

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

Increased stack height for evaporator/ concentrator when changed release point type

Increased stack temp for evaporator/ concentrator when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for evaporator/ concentrator, green liquor processing when changed release point type

Deleted records for boilers (to be replaced)

DemaDeplaRFDe

scr

B‐33
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI47074NEI26491

NEI8261

NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252

NEI7559

NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Increased stack height for paper machines when replaced fugitive paper machine records with stack records

Increased stack temperature for paper machines when replaced fugitive paper machine records with stack records

Increased stack velocity/flow for paper machines when replaced fugitive paper machine records with stack records

Deleted fugitive records for causticizing, paper machines (to be replaced)Deleted records for PB5 and PB7 (to be replaced)

DefroliqscrmaDepuDe

Increased fugitive area for WWT (ASB)

DeDepu

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)Deleted records for secondary clarifier and boiler (to be replaced)

Depu

Increased stack temperature for HD/LD pulp storage when changed release point type

Increased stack velocity/flow for HD/LD pulp storage when changed release point type

Deleted records for RFs, SDTs (being replaced with new units, emissions data for which will not be ready until Sept 2012)

B‐34
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390

NEI23

NEI42341A

NEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103

NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486

NEI6175

NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931

NEI9201

NEI41628NEI12411

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

De

Reduced acetaldehyde from BLO unit and nickel from LK

Deun

Reduced chloroform from WWT cooling towers, primary clarifierReduced nickel from boiler DeReduced acetaldehyde, chloroform, formaldehyde, 13 other HAPs from 

WWT

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

De

B‐35
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657

NEIMA10626

NEI18347

NEI208

NEI46760NEI43202

NEI8601

NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Reduced acetaldehyde, chloroform, formaldehyde, naphthalene from primary clarifier

De

clameDe

Increased fugitive area for WWTP 1‐4

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

De

Increased fugitive area for ASB

Deleted records for primary/ secondary clarifier, ASB (to be replaced)

DefroDepuDe

fro

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

De

Reduced acetaldehyde from WWT

Increased stack velocity/flow for green/white liquor processing, pulp storage, black liquor tanks, lime slaker when changed release point type

DefrostocoDesto

B‐36
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI45474NEI42710

NEI8122

NEI42730

NEIWI4050324

NEI33981NEI42410

NEIMN14904

NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908

NEIWI7500086 & 

NEIWIT$8597 

NEIWI0793640

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Deleted records for ClO2 mixer (includes acetaldehyde, chlorine, chloroform, formaldehyde, methanol)

DeDesto

Reduced acetaldehyde from dryformer

Increased stack height for boilers

Increased stack velocity/flow for boilers

Defroacenaoth

Increased velocity for Bleach Tower 2

Reduced arsenic from boiler

Deleted records for causticizing misc, lime slaker, green liquor processing (includes acetaldehyde, chloroform, methanol, naphthalene)

De

B‐37
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284

NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602

NEIPA1013489

NEI2INT16350

NEITN1050093

NEI11645

NEI11600NEI36019

NEICT3102

NEIWI4710355

NEI42961

NEW73505

NEI40488

NEIGAT$3911

NEI33866

NEI7106

NEI33950NEI40720

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

Increased stack velocity/flow for green liquor processing when changed release point type

DeothdigBSDegreDestoDema

B‐38
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI26304

NEINY5532600

NEI40553

NEINY5533400

NEI2WAT18798

NEI42385

NEIGAT$3909

NEI33072NEI33986

NEIMA131179

NEIWA0270002

171

Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions

Increased stack gas 

temperature

Increased stack gas 

velocity or flow Deleted emission units 

NEI revisions which may reduce risk

DefroDechanDesto

13 6 36 14 21 32 

B‐39
NEI32869A

NEI18334NEI40648NEI40282

NEIWI7720116, 

NEI46739, & 

NEI42963

NEIME0250002

NEI42695

Survey NEI Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

No Emissions reduction/ removal of risk driver pollutants fro

multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S 

category

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, remo

of some emission units, and net emissions reduction/ removal of risk driver/other pollutants expected to reducrisk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other 

pollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart S category; also, mill provided a contemporary risk assessment using specific meteorological data which showed reduced risk

Yes No Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other 

pollutants for entire facility expected to reduce risk for subpart S category; large emissions reduction for higher‐rNEIWI7720116; minimal net emissions increase in emissiofor low‐risk NEI46739

Changed lat/longs for pressurized groundwood emission units and boilers

Increased stack diameter for boilers

Yes No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and n

emissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectto reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for digester, decker, and 

ClO2 generator

Yes No Removal of some risk driver pollutants expected to reduc

risk for subpart S category

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

B‐40
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI41552

NEI6057

NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211

NEI7104

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/long for ASB

Changed stack diameter for paper machines (3 unique records) and BL tanks (2 unique records)

Yes Changed SCC from 

30700122 (causticizing misc) to 30700132 (green liquor 

processing)

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, remo

of risk driver pollutant from one source, and net emissionreduction of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Changed max hourly emissions for RF, SDT, LK, boilers

No Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sources 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Replacement of fugitive records with stack records and 

emissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectto reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutants expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/long for WWT

Yes No Removal of some emission units and risk driver/other 

pollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for OCC plant and paper machine

Changed fugitive angles for OCC plant and paper machine

No No revisions except minor changes to lat/longs and fugitiv

angles, so risk for subpart S category expected to be unchanged

No Changes to stack heights expected to reduce risk for subp

S category

B‐41
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI40686

NEI33135 & NEI706

NEI41599

NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450

NEI26495

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/long for WWT

Yes No Removal of some risk driver/other pollutants from multip

sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, remo

of emission unit, and emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other 

pollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk subpart S category

Changed max hourly emissions

No Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other 

pollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk subpart S category

Changed lat/long for lime mud filter

Increased stack diameter for lime slaker

No Change in release point type and stack parameters and 

emissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectto reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for WWT, paper machines

Changed fugitive angle for WWT, paper machines

No Change in fugitive parameters and net emissions reductio

risk driver pollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Yes No No revisions except suggested change in receptor locatio

so risk for subpart S category expected to be unchanged

B‐42
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI42357NEI18660

NEIIL0215971

NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247

NEI759

NEI8560

NEI42482

NEIVA00022

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/longs for ASB, RF, SDT, LK, boiler

Decreased stack diameter for RF

No Change in release temperature and emissions reduction o

risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Yes No Emissions reduction/ removal of risk driver pollutants fro

multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Changed lat/long for WWT

No Emissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expect

to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters expe

to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of emission unit expected to reduce risk for subp

S category

No Removal of some emission units and emissions reduction

removal of risk driver/other pollutants expected to reducrisk for subpart S category

No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk fo

subpart S category

Changed lat/long for WWT

Changed fugitive angle for WWT

Yes No Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk f

subpart S category

No Net emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

B‐43
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI34030

NEI8278

NEI11610

NEI6261

NEI43472NEI33883

NEI8186

NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/long for paper machine when replaced paper machine records with separate wet/dry end recordsChanged lat/longs for boilers

No Change in paper machine configuration (to include wet/d

end) and change in stack parameter expected to reduce rfor subpart S category

Increased stack diameter for green liquor processing, black liquor tanks, pulp storage when changed release point type

Changed pollutant code for m,p‐cresol

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

removal of risk driver/other pollutants from multiple souexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Increased stack diameter for sec fiber pulping, paper machines, space heaters when changed release point type

No Changes to release point type and parameters expected t

reduce risk for subpart S category

No Emissions reduction of HAP driver/other pollutants expec

to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Changed fugitive angle for WWT

Yes No Emissions reduction of HAP driver pollutants expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of some emission units and dmissions reduction 

HAP driver pollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart category

No No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions received

Yes No Removal of some risk driver pollutants expected to reduc

risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/long for WWT

No Changes in stack/ fugitive parameters and removal of som

emission units expected to reduce risk for subpart S categ

Changed lat/long for WWT

Changed fugitive angle for WWT

No Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

B‐44
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658

NEI7181

NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400

NEI8265

NEI42341B

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Increased stack diameter for causticizing, pulp storage, BL tanks, BSW, decker when changed release point type

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters expe

to reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed pollutant from hexachloro‐benzene to hexachlorocyclo‐pentadiene for SDTs

No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk fo

subpart S category

Changed lat/long for WWT

No Change in fugitive parameters and removal of risk driver 

pollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other pollutan

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sources 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/long for paper machine when replaced paper machine records with separate wet/dry end records

No Change in paper machine configuration (to include wet/d

end) and stack parameters, removal of some emission unand net emissions reduction expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

Changed lat/longs for pulp oper, paper machines, hot water 

accum drain

No Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutants expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of risk driver/ other pollutants expected to redu

risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

B‐45
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI33025 or 

NEW71411

NEI33023NEI46814

NEI6273

NEI46599

NEI8619

NEI42254

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

No Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk f

subpart S category

Reduced fugitive angle for primary clarifierIncreased fugitive angle for WWTP

Increased diameter for stock chests when changed release point type

No Change in release point type and stack parameters and ne

emissions reductions/ removal of biphenyl, o‐cresol, chloroform, and other chlorinated HAPs expected to redurisk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Changed lat/longs for groundwood ops, NDCE RF, and boiler

Yes No Minimal net emissions increase for subpart S, so any incre

in risk for subpart S category expected to be minor; also, cancer MIR for subpart S is ~1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI and HQ(REL)<<1, so any increase in risk is not expected to resin a high risk result

Yes No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

emissions reductions of risk driver/other pollutants expecto reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk f

subpart S category

Increased stack diameter for evaporator/ concentrator, green liquor processing when changed release point type

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

removal of biphenyl, o‐cresol, and o‐xylene from multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

B‐46
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI47074NEI26491

NEI8261

NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252

NEI7559

NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/longs for paper machines

Increased stack diameter for paper machines when replaced fugitive paper machine records with stack records

Changed BSW to paper machine (SCC changed)

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

replacement of fugitive records with lower‐emitting stack records expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of biphenyl, o‐cresol, and chlorinated HAPs from 

multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for WWT (ASB, up/downstream ditches)

Changed fugitive angle for WWT (upstream ditch)

No Change in fugitive parameters and removal of risk driver 

pollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sources 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk f

subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for primary/ secondary clarifiers

Changed fugitive angle for secondary clarifier

No Removal of biphenyl from multiple sources expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Increased stack diameter for HD/LD pulp storage when changed release point type

No Changes to release point type and stack parameters 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart S 

category expected to be unchanged

B‐47
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390

NEI23

NEI42341A

NEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103

NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486

NEI6175

NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931

NEI9201

NEI41628NEI12411

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

No Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutant 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for WWT, BLO unit

Split up BLO unit emissionsChange release point type for BLO unit from vertical to vertical with rain cap

No No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart S 

category expected to be unchanged

No No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Net emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk fo

subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reductions of risk driver/other pollutants expec

to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutant 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

B‐48
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657

NEIMA10626

NEI18347

NEI208

NEI46760NEI43202

NEI8601

NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

No Large net emissions increase for subpart S; however, 98% 

the added emissions is methanol (only 5.7 tons attributed other risk driver pollutants); also cancer MIR for subpart S <<1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI and HQ(REL)<1, so any increasrisk is not expected to result in a high risk result

No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk fo

subpart S category

Changed lat/longs for WWTP1‐4,6

Changed fugitive angle for WWTP1,6

No Changes in fugitive parameters and removal of some 

emission units and risk driver pollutant expected to reducrisk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions received

Changed fugitive angle for primary/ secondary clarifier, ASB

No Changes in fugitive parameters and removal of biphenyl a

chlorinated HAPs from multiple sources expected to redurisk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutant 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected to 

reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

Increased stack diameter for green/white liquor processing, pulp storage, black liquor tanks, lime slaker when changed release point type

Changed SCC from 30700122 (causticizing misc) to 30700132 (green liquor processing)

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

removal of o‐xylene and chlorinated HAPs from multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions received

B‐49
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI45474NEI42710

NEI8122

NEI42730

NEIWI4050324

NEI33981NEI42410

NEIMN14904

NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908

NEIWI7500086 & 

NEIWIT$8597 

NEIWI0793640

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed fugitive angle for WWT

No Removal of emission unit and risk driver/other pollutants 

from multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Small net emissions increase for subpart S; however, the 

added pollutant (4.8 tons) is vinyl acetate (not risk driver)while the reduced pollutant (1.8 tons) is acetaldehyde (risdriver); also cancer MIR for subpart S is <<1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI and HQ(REL)<<1, so any increase in risk is not expected to result in a high risk result

Changed lat/longs for boilers

Increased stack diameters for boilers

No No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart S 

category expected to be unchanged

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

Increased diameter for Bleach Tower 1; reduced diameter for Bleach Tower 2

No Minor changes in stack parameters for two release points 

expected to have minimal impact on risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart S 

category expected to be unchanged

No Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutant 

expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

B‐50
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284

NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602

NEIPA1013489

NEI2INT16350

NEITN1050093

NEI11645

NEI11600NEI36019

NEICT3102

NEIWI4710355

NEI42961

NEW73505

NEI40488

NEIGAT$3911

NEI33866

NEI7106

NEI33950NEI40720

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

Changed lat/long for pulp storage

Increased stack diameter for green liquor processing when changed release point type

No Changes in release point type and stack parameters and 

removal of o‐cresol, o‐xylene, chloroform, and other chlorinated HAPs from multiple sources expected to redurisk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received; mill closed in Feb 2012No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions received

B‐51
NEI32869A

Survey NEI

NEI26304

NEINY5532600

NEI40553

NEINY5533400

NEI2WAT18798

NEI42385

NEIGAT$3909

NEI33072NEI33986

NEIMA131179

NEIWA0270002

171

Changed lat/longs

Changed fugitive 

angle Changed stack diameter

Recommended 

change to 

receptor location Other

Remodel? Reasons 

NEI revisions with unknown effect

No Removal of biphenyl, o‐xylene, methylene chloride, and 

other chlorinated HAP from multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category

No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo Not modeled

25 11 15 13 8 171 

B‐52