alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Newport News Division

Case No.: 19-51575-SCS

Chapter 13

In re: RICHARD PATRICK MONAHAN

KRISTIN POWELL MONAHAN

Debtors

NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Michael P. Cotter, Chapter 13 Trustee, has filed papers with the court to dismiss your case. Your rights may be 

affected. You should read these papers carefully and discuss them with your attorney, if you have one in this 

bankruptcy case. (If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to consult one.)

If you do not want the court to dismiss your case or if you want the court to consider your views on the motion, then 

you and your attorney must:

ATTEND THE HEARING SCHEDULED TO BE HELD:

at on February 07, 2020 at 10:00 am

If you or your attorney do not take these steps, the court may decide that you do not oppose on the motion and may 

enter an order granting that relief.

MICHAEL P. COTTER, TRUSTEE

BY /s/ Michael P. Cotter 

U.S. Courthouse

2400 WEST AVENUE

NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23607

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion and Notice of Hearing was mailed this 3rd day of January, 

2020 to:

RICHARD PATRICK MONAHAN

KRISTIN POWELL MONAHAN

27 WORNOM FARM ROAD

POQUOSON, VA 23662

CHARLES G. HAVENER, ESQ

HAVEN LAW GROUP P.C.

2021 CUNNINGHAM DRIVE

SUITE 310

HAMPTON, VA 23666

/s/ Michael P. Cotter

Case 19-51575-SCS Doc 27 Filed 01/03/20 Entered 01/03/20 12:29:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Newport News Division

Case No.: 19-51575-SCS

Chapter 13

In re: RICHARD PATRICK MONAHAN

KRISTIN POWELL MONAHAN

Debtors

____

TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

COMES NOW Michael P. Cotter, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, who moves for dismissal of the above referenced 

bankruptcy matter, based on the debtors having scheduled unsecured debts that far exceed the debt limits under Section 

109(e). The debtors are ineligible to file a Chapter 13.

For the foregoing reason, this case should be dismissed.

MICHAEL P. COTTER, TRUSTEE

BY /s/ Michael P. Cotter 

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion and Notice of Hearing was mailed this 3rd day of January, 

2020 to:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

RICHARD PATRICK MONAHAN

KRISTIN POWELL MONAHAN

27 WORNOM FARM ROAD

POQUOSON, VA 23662

CHARLES G. HAVENER, ESQ

HAVEN LAW GROUP P.C.

2021 CUNNINGHAM DRIVE

SUITE 310

HAMPTON, VA 23666

/s/ Michael P. Cotter

Michael P. Cotter VSB No. 19526

Chapter 13 Standing Trustee

870 Greenbrier Circle, Suite 402

Chesapeake, VA 23320

(757) 961-3000

Case 19-51575-SCS Doc 27 Filed 01/03/20 Entered 01/03/20 12:29:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5317 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5317

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
315 Addicks Howell Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``Deputy Sandeep Singh 
                    Dhaliwal Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DEPUTY SANDEEP SINGH DHALIWAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 315 Addicks Howell Road in Houston, Texas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Deputy Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 473

 523

 530

 564

 538

 524

 524

 531

 569

 587

 583

 565

 542

 536

 539

 553

 561

 570

 575

 549

 544

 565

 570

 586

 613

 634

 648

 691

 392

 467

 485

 485

 479

 471

 462

 464

 445

 433

 435

 434

 461

 433

 426

 420

 427

 433

 433

 421

 424

 425

 428

 406

 398

 405

 479

 418

 440

 489

 501

 511

 515

 494

 484

 498

 500

 490

 483

 478

 480

 472

 477

 481

 486

 503

 487

 470

 483

 483

 488

 495

 494

 479

 534

 525

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 288

 318

 326

 332

 334

 321

 315

 324

 325

 319

 314

 311

 313

 308

 311

 313

 316

 327

 317

 306

 314

 314

 318

 322

 321

 312

 346

 340

TOTAL 13,720

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 75.561 Approval of indirect cost rates. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70330 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) If the Department of Education is the cognizant agency, the Secretary approves an indirect cost rate for a grantee other than a local educational agency. For the purposes of this section, the term local educational agency does not include a State agency.
( b ) Each State educational agency, on the basis of a plan approved by the Secretary, shall approve an indirect cost rate for each local educational agency that requests it to do so. These rates may be for periods longer than a year if rates are sufficiently stable to justify a longer period.
( c ) The Secretary generally approves indirect cost rate agreements annually. Indirect cost rate agreements may be approved for periods longer than a year if the Secretary determines that rates will be sufficiently stable to justify a longer rate period.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[59 FR 59583, Nov. 17, 1994]
432 P.2d 256

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike APODACA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8372.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 2, 1967.

*413William W. Bivins, Las Cruces, for appellant.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O. O’Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Interim Supp.1966), raised issues concerning (1) evidence of entrapment, (2) representation by counsel and (3) effective counsel. The motion was denied. His appeal raises the same issues.

*Entrapment.*The issue of entrapment was submitted to the jury. The jury resolved the issue by its verdict. By his motion defendant seeks to retry the issue of entrapment. He may not do so. State v. Selgado, 78 N.M. 165, 429 P.2d 363 (1967). A claim of entrapment does not state a basis for post-conviction relief. Anderson v. United States, 338 F.2d 618 (9th Cir. 1964); Moore v. United States, 334 F.2d 25 (5th Cir. 1964); United States v. Bailey, 331 F.2d 218 (7th Cir. 1964); Way v. United States, 276 F.2d 912 (10th Cir. 1960).

*Representation by Counsel.*Defendant claims that he was not represented by an attorney when he appeared before the magistrate; that this was a critical stage of the proceedings; that he was entitled to appointed counsel at this stage. Counsel was appointed to represent defendant on October 1st. His preliminary hearing was held October 6th. The transcript of the preliminary hearing shows that he had counsel at this hearing. This claim states no basis for post-conviction relief.

*Effective Counsel.*Defendant claims his attorney was “pro-forma rather than zealous and active.” Such a general claim does not provide a basis for relief. State v. Moser, 78 N.M. 212, 430 P.2d 106 (1967).

Defendant also claims that his representation was inadequate, and that this is demonstrated by failure of counsel “to win the case on the facts of entrapment.” Such an assertion is frequently made by a disappointed defendant for whom counsel was unable to obtain the result for which his client had hoped. United States v. Edwards, 152 F.Supp. 179 (D.D.C.1957). One is not deprived of his constitutional right to counsel because in retrospection he concludes that the representation did not meet his hoped for standard of effectiveness. Merritt v. Hunter, 170 F.2d 739 (10th Cir. *4141948); Moss v. Hunter, 167 F.2d 683 (10th Cir. 1948), cert. denied 334 U.S. 860, 68 S.Ct. 1519, 92 L.Ed. 1780 (1948). Dissatisfaction with the results obtained through the efforts of his attorney does not provide a basis for post-conviction relief. Kinney v. United States, 177 F.2d 895 (10th Cir. 1949).

The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 391.60

 391.55

 391.45

 391.44

 391.37

 391.36

 391.47

 392.45

 393.54

 394.19

 394.48

 394.69

 394.83

 395.04

 395.17

 395.17

 395.22

 395.36

 395.52

 395.82

 395.83

 395.67

 395.73

 395.77

 395.74

 395.62

 395.59

 395.72

 396.10

 398.38

 401.75

 326.2

 325.9

 325.3

 325.2

 324.8

 324.7

 325.4

 331.3

 338.0

 342.0

 343.9

 345.2

 346.0

 347.4

 348.2

 348.2

 348.5

 349.4

 350.4

 352.3

 352.4

 351.3

 351.7

 352.0

 351.8

 351.0

 350.8

 351.7

 354.1

 368.8

 391.2

STORAGE

-0.3

-0.3

-0.6

-0.1

-0.4

-0.1

+0.7

+5.9

+6.7

+4.0

+1.8

+1.3

+0.9

+1.3

+0.8

+0.0

+0.3

+0.9

+1.0

+1.9

+0.1

-1.0

+0.4

+0.3

-0.2

-0.8

-0.2

+0.8

+2.4

+14.7

+22.4

CHANGE

1,660

1,741

1,695

1,754

1,534

1,701

2,075

4,653

4,878

3,774

2,727

2,501

2,288

2,718

2,330

2,030

2,128

2,482

2,582

2,840

1,949

1,477

1,724

1,689

1,458

1,148

1,662

1,926

2,660

8,660

11,966

INFLOW

 1,700

 1,789

 1,883

 1,674

 1,636

 1,625

 1,644

 1,551

 1,400

 1,638

 1,706

 1,735

 1,748

 1,950

 1,811

 1,925

 1,863

 1,930

 1,965

 1,779

 1,825

 1,886

 1,425

 1,458

 1,453

 1,431

 1,651

 1,421

 1,356

 1,136

 540

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 94

 94

 100

 103

 102

 103

 97

 94

 93

 93

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 99

 98

 98

 99

 99

 92

 92

 99

 97

 95

 95

 91

 87

 88

 87

 87

PUMPING

 18

 10

 16

 8

 8

 4

 0

 14

 14

 13

 8

 6

 0

 6

 6

 6

 8

 8

 8

 6

 0

 9

 9

 6

 6

 4

 15

 4

 2

 29

 46

C.F.S.

 .09

 .05

 .08

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .07

 .02

 .01

 .13

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .73

 .96

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .75

 .40

 2.26

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 13, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +64.6 86,410 50,534 0 0 2,971 297 1.42 5.21

ACRE-FEET +64,600 171,394 100,234 0 0 5,893 589

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 100,234

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 5,893

TOTAL 106,127

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 12.52

 326.5

OUTLET 0 5.21

Table 11
COMMENTS: Values in Acre-Feet

Day

Elev

Feet Storage Change

Federal

Pump

Federal

Gen

Pacheco

Pump ADJ

Federal

Change

Federal

Storage

496,803

1 481.09 1,296,098 18,490 8,301 0 0 0 7,746 504,549

2 482.83 1,315,116 19,018 8,280 0 0 0 8,019 512,568

3 484.55 1,334,005 18,889 8,210 0 0 0 7,976 520,544

4 485.92 1,349,114 15,109 8,206 0 0 0 7,958 528,502

5 487.28 1,364,170 15,056 6,129 0 0 0 5,895 534,397

6 488.59 1,378,725 14,555 4,064 0 0 0 3,649 538,046

7 489.80 1,392,216 13,491 3,936 0 0 0 4,649 542,695

8 490.84 1,403,846 11,630 11,418 0 0 0 11,359 554,054

9 491.95 1,416,295 12,449 7,587 0 0 0 7,716 561,770

10 493.03 1,428,442 12,147 7,266 0 0 0 7,226 568,996

11 494.20 1,441,642 13,200 7,460 0 0 0 7,208 576,204

12 495.36 1,454,770 13,128 7,931 0 0 0 7,747 583,951

13 496.46 1,467,255 12,485 7,249 0 0 0 7,126 591,077

14 496.74 1,470,439 3,184 7,345 0 0 0 5,422 596,499

15 497.36 1,477,498 7,059 6,847 0 0 0 6,641 603,140

16 497.97 1,484,453 6,955 7,251 0 0 0 7,013 610,153

17 498.60 1,491,649 7,196 7,253 0 0 0 7,126 617,279

18 498.84 1,494,393 2,744 1,139 0 0 0 1,124 618,403

19 499.17 1,498,169 3,776 3,839 0 0 0 3,790 622,193

20 499.58 1,502,865 4,696 4,467 0 0 0 4,337 626,530

21 499.97 1,507,337 4,472 4,255 0 0 0 4,305 630,835

22 500.41 1,512,387 5,050 4,770 0 0 0 4,853 635,688

23 500.80 1,516,868 4,481 4,851 0 0 0 4,568 640,256

24 501.25 1,522,044 5,176 4,284 0 0 0 4,649 644,905

25 501.73 1,527,572 5,528 5,387 0 0 0 5,420 650,325

26 502.54 1,536,916 9,344 6,665 0 0 0 6,744 657,069

27 503.33 1,546,048 9,132 6,550 0 0 0 6,811 663,880

28 504.59 1,560,651 14,603 6,973 0 0 0 8,825 672,705

Totals 283,043 177,913 0 0 0 175,902

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Federal 

Daily Operations

February 2023 Run Date: 1/31/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CorVu Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph Caffarelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  January 19, 2006

                                    /s/ Joseph J. Caffarelli
                                    ---------------------------
                                        Joseph  J. Caffarelli
                                        Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 431.19

 431.74

 432.19

 432.65

 433.02

 433.35

 433.82

 434.28

 434.80

 435.29

 435.76

 436.50

 438.85

 440.55

 441.47

 442.19

 442.89

 443.46

 443.94

 444.45

 445.11

 445.69

 446.27

 447.07

 448.18

 449.25

 450.12

 451.28

 452.08

 452.43

 624.3

 629.3

 633.4

 637.6

 640.9

 644.0

 648.3

 652.5

 657.3

 661.9

 666.2

 673.2

 695.4

 711.7

 720.6

 727.5

 734.4

 740.0

 744.7

 749.7

 756.2

 762.0

 767.8

 775.8

 787.0

 797.9

 806.8

 818.7

 827.0

 830.6

STORAGE

+4.6

+5.0

+4.1

+4.2

+3.4

+3.0

+4.3

+4.2

+4.8

+4.5

+4.4

+6.9

+22.2

+16.3

+8.9

+7.0

+6.8

+5.6

+4.7

+5.0

+6.5

+5.8

+5.8

+8.0

+11.2

+10.9

+8.9

+11.9

+8.3

+3.6

CHANGE

4,442

4,768

4,139

4,227

3,717

3,444

4,423

4,083

4,543

4,491

4,345

5,696

12,968

10,079

6,347

5,535

5,453

4,914

4,482

4,532

5,430

5,026

4,957

6,237

7,723

8,217

7,052

8,614

8,321

7,311

INFLOW

 1,943

 2,139

 1,936

 1,962

 1,876

 1,744

 2,069

 1,765

 1,901

 1,975

 1,945

 2,035

 1,616

 1,713

 1,705

 1,848

 1,850

 1,967

 1,926

 1,814

 1,960

 1,964

 1,901

 2,041

 1,954

 2,601

 2,410

 2,426

 4,039

 5,358

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 133

 103

 132

 118

 133

 131

 141

 144

 171

 178

 148

 128

 126

 124

 116

 122

 126

 126

 130

 130

 129

 121

 112

 109

 106

 117

 114

 108

 106

 105

PUMPING

 54

 21

 15

 36

 9

 43

 40

 37

 49

 46

 47

 44

 32

 26

 42

 39

 33

 3

 49

 49

 49

 33

 27

 47

 17

 20

 48

 65

 7

 14

C.F.S.

 .18

 .07

 .05

 .12

 .03

 .14

 .13

 .12

 .16

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .10

 .08

 .13

 .12

 .10

 .01

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .10

 .08

 .14

 .05

 .06

 .14

 .19

 .02

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .09

 .03

 .32

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.27

 .89

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .61

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .00

 .05

 .60

 .27

 .00

 .84

 .08

 .02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +210.8 175,516 64,383 0 0 3,787 1,041 3.25 5.39

ACRE-FEET +210,800 348,136 127,704 0 0 7,512 2,065

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 127,704

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 7,512

TOTAL 135,216

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 19.78

 619.7

OUTLET 0 5.39
#### § 19.79 Registry of stills.

Section 29.55 of this chapter requires that every person having possession, custody, or control of a still or distilling apparatus must register the still or distilling apparatus. When a person lists a still or distilling apparatus with the application for registration as required by § 19.75(b) and receives approval of the registration, that person has fulfilled the requirement to register the still or distilling apparatus. See § 29.55 of this chapter for additional provisions regarding stills and distilling apparatus.

(26 U.S.C. 5172, 5179)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 190

 186

 177

 172

 175

 192

 192

 179

 183

 181

 182

 186

 184

 178

 181

 191

 184

 185

 171

 166

 161

 165

 228

 243

 227

 227

 226

 230

 231

 224

 223

 142

 135

 117

 116

 146

 141

 125

 129

 138

 123

 129

 144

 145

 147

 136

 159

 147

 133

 148

 146

 127

 114

 120

 215

 209

 214

 214

 213

 214

 190

 197

 171

 169

 161

 159

 163

 174

 173

 160

 165

 165

 169

 171

 170

 167

 166

 179

 173

 169

 160

 158

 153

 157

 178

 225

 219

 220

 220

 222

 222

 213

 211

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 427.57

 427.44

 428.58

 430.12

 430.55

 431.45

 433.88

 435.00

 434.96

 434.45

 433.42

 432.77

 432.27

 431.91

 431.76

 431.86

 432.12

 432.53

 433.10

 433.84

 434.53

 435.11

 436.34

 437.33

 437.95

 438.51

 438.97

 440.11

 441.13

 441.98

 442.92

 592.2

 591.0

 601.0

 614.7

 618.6

 626.7

 648.8

 659.2

 658.8

 654.1

 644.6

 638.7

 634.1

 630.8

 629.5

 630.4

 632.7

 636.5

 641.7

 648.5

 654.8

 660.2

 671.7

 681.0

 686.8

 692.1

 696.5

 707.4

 717.3

 725.5

 734.7

STORAGE

-5.9

-1.1

+10.0

+13.7

+3.9

+8.1

+22.1

+10.3

-0.4

-4.7

-9.5

-5.9

-4.6

-3.3

-1.4

+0.9

+2.4

+3.7

+5.2

+6.8

+6.4

+5.4

+11.5

+9.3

+5.9

+5.3

+4.4

+10.9

+9.8

+8.2

+9.2

CHANGE

14,374

12,415

18,226

20,410

15,493

18,533

26,110

20,150

14,960

12,605

9,726

8,854

7,955

7,426

7,234

7,176

7,308

7,575

7,747

8,183

8,044

7,872

10,811

9,571

8,007

7,535

7,443

10,432

10,383

9,108

9,399

INFLOW

 5,366

 5,247

 5,363

 5,360

 5,234

 5,232

 5,290

 5,096

 5,162

 5,116

 5,145

 5,131

 5,108

 5,057

 5,076

 5,048

 5,012

 5,084

 4,974

 4,688

 4,750

 5,101

 4,953

 4,780

 4,980

 4,437

 5,157

 4,840

 5,323

 4,833

 4,644

POWER

 11,905

 7,688

 7,746

 8,100

 8,257

 9,159

 9,602

 9,759

 9,911

 9,788

 9,274

 6,607

 5,020

 3,928

 2,750

 1,588

 898

 505

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 339

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 59

 54

 51

 54

 58

 58

 55

 53

 55

 59

 61

 59

 64

 72

 73

 76

 80

 86

 81

 73

 61

 65

 75

 77

 77

 77

 72

 67

 69

 75

 79

PUMPING

 9

 0

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 28

 19

 18

 24

 55

 57

 18

 18

 9

 130

 18

 73

 0

 25

 0

 0

 25

 0

 0

 10

 22

 32

 45

 52

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .18

 .19

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .43

 .06

 .24

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .10

 .14

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .49

 .25

 .00

 .13

 .60

 .60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .00

 .09

 1.04

 .00

 .12

 .13

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +136.6 351,065 156,587 122,824 0 2,075 702 2.28 3.80

ACRE-FEET +136,600 696,337 310,590 243,621 0 4,116 1,392

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 598.0

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 310,590

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 243,621

 4,116

TOTAL 558,327

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE = 24.62

OUTLET 0 3.80

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 24.62
COURT OF ApPEALS FOR THE
 

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
 

ORDER 

Cause No.	 01-12-00746-CV; In re Angel Lozano 

On Appeal from the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-61483 

Relator, Angel Lozano, has filed a petition for writ ofmandamus. The Court requests 

a response to relator's petition from real parties in interest, Michael Neal, Cynthia Neal, Neal & 

Company, LLC, and Neal & Neal, LLC. TEX. R. ApP. P. 52.4. Any response, or, in the 

alternative, a letter indicating that real parties in interest desire to waive their right to respond, is 

due to be filed in this Court by September 6, 2012. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Judge's signature: ----'-/.::<:s/_T~eIT~y--'J:....::e:...:n'"'_'n'"'_'in'_O.lg=>.'s"____ _

o Acting individually o Acting for the Court 

Date: 8/24/2012 

Note : 

Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed. must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. IO.3(a). 

Single justice may grant or den y any request for relief properly sough t by motion, except in a civil case a single ju st ice 

should not : ( I) act on a petition for an extrao rd inary writ or (2) dismi ss or otherwise determine an app eal or a mot ion for 

rehe aring. TEX. R. APP. P. IO.4(a).