alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

February 2017

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 89 0 0 10,233 4,016 14,249 20,297 7,965 28,262 0.0 0.0

2-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 64 0 64 74 0 0 10,426 4,023 14,449 20,680 7,979 28,659 0.0 0.0

3-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 67 0 0 10,190 4,035 14,224 20,211 8,003 28,214 0.0 0.0

4-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 71 0 71 69 0 0 10,190 4,024 14,214 20,211 7,982 28,193 0.0 0.0

5-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 56 0 0 10,233 4,025 14,258 20,297 7,984 28,281 0.0 0.0

6-Feb-17 4 0 4 0 8 0 8 46 0 0 10,189 4,052 14,241 20,210 8,038 28,248 0.2 0.0

7-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 35 0 0 9,971 4,080 14,051 19,778 8,093 27,871 0.0 0.0

8-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 28 0 0 9,901 4,087 13,987 19,638 8,106 27,744 0.0 0.0

9-Feb-17 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 27 0 0 9,799 4,102 13,901 19,437 8,136 27,573 0.0 0.0

10-Feb-17 0 4 4 1 4 0 4 26 0 0 9,865 4,108 13,973 19,568 8,148 27,716 0.0 0.5

11-Feb-17 0 0 0 1 17 0 17 24 0 0 9,765 4,137 13,902 19,369 8,205 27,574 0.0 0.0

12-Feb-17 0 0 0 1 26 0 26 24 0 0 9,958 4,127 14,084 19,751 8,185 27,936 0.0 0.0

13-Feb-17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 22 0 0 10,006 4,184 14,190 19,847 8,298 28,145 0.0 0.0

14-Feb-17 9 0 9 1 20 0 20 22 0 0 10,064 4,213 14,276 19,961 8,356 28,317 0.5 0.0

15-Feb-17 4 0 4 2 8 0 8 20 0 0 10,004 4,126 14,130 19,842 8,184 28,026 0.2 0.0

16-Feb-17 0 0 0 2 33 0 33 18 0 0 8,175 4,138 12,313 16,215 8,208 24,423 0.0 0.0

17-Feb-17 0 0 0 2 46 4 50 20 0 0 6,148 4,161 10,309 12,194 8,253 20,447 0.0 0.0

18-Feb-17 0 0 0 2 124 4 128 24 0 0 3,708 4,158 7,866 7,355 8,247 15,602 0.0 0.0

19-Feb-17 0 0 0 2 8 0 8 24 0 0 3,331 4,143 7,475 6,608 8,218 14,826 0.0 0.0

20-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 12 0 12 24 0 0 N 3,331 4,136 7,467 6,608 8,203 14,811 0.0 0.0

21-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 8 0 8 24 0 0 N 3,331 3,965 7,297 6,608 7,865 14,473 0.0 0.0

22-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 16 0 16 24 0 0 N 3,331 3,529 6,861 6,608 7,000 13,608 0.0 0.0

23-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 4 4 8 24 0 0 N 3,331 3,608 6,939 6,608 7,156 13,764 0.0 0.0

24-Feb-17 4 0 N 4 1 1 0 1 24 0 0 N 4,065 3,595 7,660 8,063 7,131 15,194 0.5 0.0

25-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 0 0 0 23 0 0 N 4,066 3,604 7,670 8,064 7,149 15,213 0.0 0.0

26-Feb-17 0 0 N 0 1 4 0 4 21 0 0 N 3,882 3,603 7,485 7,700 7,147 14,847 0.0 0.0

27-Feb-17 0 N 0 N 0 1 8 0 8 22 0 N 0 N 4,145 3,728 7,873 8,221 7,395 15,616 0.0 0.0

28-Feb-17 0 N 0 N 0 1 4 0 4 21 0 N 0 N 3,707 3,800 7,507 7,352 7,538 14,890 0.0 0.0

Total 21 4 25 XXXX 585 12 597 XXXX 0 0 205,345 111,506 316,851 407,301 221,172 628,473 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Tracy Combined SWP CVP
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5252 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5252

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal opportunity zones.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 2019

Ms. Tlaib (for herself and Ms. Jayapal) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal opportunity zones.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF OPPORTUNITY ZONES AND RECOGNITION OF DEFERRED 
              GAIN.

    (a) In General.--Effective on the day after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, subchapter Z of chapter 1 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is repealed, and any gain to which section 1400Z-
2(a)(1)(B) of such Code would have otherwise applied shall be included 
in income under section 1400Z-2(b) of such Code (determined by 
substituting the date of the enactment of this Act for ``December 31, 
2026'' in paragraph (1)(B) thereof).
    (b) Repeal of Special Rule for Investments Held for at Least 10 
Years.--For purposes of section 1400Z-2(c) of such Code, the repeal 
under subsection (a) shall be effective with respect to any investment 
held before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 542.91

 542.67

 542.35

 541.80

 541.36

 540.70

 540.49

 540.28

 540.07

 539.30

 538.53

 537.82

 537.08

 536.45

 535.83

 535.11

 534.15

 533.30

 532.00

 530.89

 530.19

 529.51

 528.71

 527.54

 526.12

 524.84

 523.58

 522.81

 521.98

 520.48

 2,026,692

 2,023,644

 2,019,582

 2,012,607

 2,007,034

 1,998,683

 1,996,029

 1,993,375

 1,990,724

 1,981,010

 1,971,313

 1,962,387

 1,953,098

 1,945,202

 1,937,443

 1,928,445

 1,916,471

 1,905,890

 1,889,748

 1,876,002

 1,867,352

 1,858,962

 1,849,108

 1,834,729

 1,817,331

 1,801,697

 1,786,353

 1,776,998

 1,766,934

 1,748,795

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,490

 2,899

 2,902

 1,847

 1,833

 1,476

 2,226

 2,679

 2,904

 3,974

 5,220

 3,990

 1,049

 1,938

 3,864

 5,178

 5,204

 5,013

 5,293

 4,950

 6,743

 6,899

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL March 17, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2019 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -279,422 79,571 5,655 -83,634

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-1,525

-3,048

-4,062

-6,975

-5,573

-8,351

-2,654

-2,654

-2,651

-9,714

-9,697

-8,926

-9,289

-7,896

-7,759

-8,998

-11,974

-10,581

-16,142

-13,746

-8,650

-8,390

-9,854

-14,379

-17,398

-15,634

-15,344

-9,355

-10,064

-18,139

 70

 59

 76

 71

 103

 103

 125

 172

 136

 155

 169

 170

 234

 178

 180

 192

 201

 238

 259

 231

 228

 242

 255

 254

 251

 251

 256

 249

 220

 327

-101

-80

5

-139

-77

-84

826

-51

-1,675

-2,958

-2,962

-1,901

-1,997

-1,685

-2,382

-2,862

-2,921

-4,140

-5,356

-4,220

-1,104

-2,036

-3,941

-5,144

-5,372

-5,365

-5,433

-5,265

-7,029

-8,185

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 965,324

 965,244

 965,249

 965,110

 965,033

 964,949

 965,775

 965,724

 964,049

 961,091

 958,129

 956,228

 954,231

 952,546

 950,164

 947,302

 944,381

 940,241

 934,885

 930,665

 929,561

 927,525

 923,584

 918,440

 913,068

 907,703

 902,270

 897,005

 889,976

 881,791

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 965,425

0

0

0

0

0

0

852

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

852
#### § 19.498 Relabeling and reclosing off bonded premises.

The proprietor of a distilled spirits plant may relabel, affix brand labels, or reclose bottled taxpaid spirits on wholesale liquor dealer premises or at a taxpaid storeroom on, contiguous to, adjacent to, or in the immediate vicinity of the proprietor's distilled spirits plant, provided that the wholesale liquor dealer premises or taxpaid storeroom is operated in connection with the distilled spirits plant. If products relabeled under this section were originally bottled by another proprietor, the relabeling proprietor must have on file a statement from the original bottler consenting to the relabeling.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)
§ 86.400 What is the scope of this subpart? ( a ) The procedures in this subpart are the exclusive procedures governing appeals of decisions by a designated Department official to demand the repayment of Federal financial assistance or terminate the eligibility of an IHE to receive some or all forms of Federal financial assistance for violations of this part.
( b ) An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hears appeals under this subpart.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1145g)
[55 FR 33581, Aug. 16, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 66225, Dec. 17, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 520.02

 521.02

 521.46

 522.28

 523.16

 524.05

 524.73

 525.15

 526.05

 526.38

 526.83

 527.20

 527.48

 527.83

 528.08

 528.94

 529.23

 530.19

 531.06

 531.57

 532.14

 532.98

 534.07

 534.92

 535.70

 536.40

 536.87

 537.17

 537.02

 537.25

 537.14

 1,743,246

 1,755,318

 1,760,638

 1,770,569

 1,781,248

 1,792,071

 1,800,355

 1,805,479

 1,816,474

 1,820,512

 1,826,023

 1,830,558

 1,833,993

 1,838,289

 1,841,361

 1,851,939

 1,855,511

 1,867,352

 1,878,105

 1,884,419

 1,891,484

 1,901,912

 1,915,474

 1,926,073

 1,935,817

 1,944,576

 1,950,465

 1,954,227

 1,952,346

 1,955,231

 1,953,851

 2,727

 9,594

 3,349

 3,537

 3,578

 3,680

 3,374

 3,452

 11,173

 3,767

 4,122

 4,564

 3,905

 4,650

 5,019

 10,107

 3,490

 3,762

 3,213

 3,798

 3,190

 3,449

 7,223

 3,271

 2,813

 2,709

 2,386

 2,352

 3,195

 5,120

 3,224

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL May 28, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2003 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 214,462 0 7,842 67,020

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 3,857

 12,072

 5,320

 9,931

 10,679

 10,823

 8,284

 5,124

 10,995

 4,038

 5,511

 4,535

 3,435

 4,296

 3,072

 10,578

 3,572

 11,841

 10,753

 6,314

 7,065

 10,428

 13,562

 10,599

 9,744

 8,759

 5,889

 3,762

-1,881

 2,885

-1,380

 186

 190

 190

 213

 232

 212

 103

 3

 4

 82

 271

 171

 317

 286

 274

 234

 273

 277

 270

 288

 309

 312

 290

 298

 323

 329

 302

 385

 375

 385

 458

-652

6,463

3,107

352

377

503

288

459

7,911

1,472

1,635

2,169

1,346

2,122

4,887

9,794

1,018

3,400

2,871

3,431

2,809

3,083

6,853

434

-107

-185

-514

-670

215

2,321

-172

ELEV STORAGE

 133,793

 901,321

 907,784

 910,891

 911,243

 911,620

 912,123

 912,411

 912,870

 920,781

 922,253

 923,888

 926,057

 927,403

 929,525

 934,412

 944,206

 945,224

 948,624

 951,495

 954,926

 957,735

 960,818

 967,671

 968,105

 967,998

 967,813

 967,299

 966,629

 966,844

 969,165

 968,993

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 901,973

-2,916

-2,916

0

-2,916

-2,916

-2,916

-2,916

-2,916

-3,209

-2,171

-2,171

-2,171

-2,171

-2,171

0

0

-2,171

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-2,500

-56,647
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Homeland Security Network, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Ubaldi, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ PETER UBALDIPeter UbaldiPresidentDate: April 15, 2006
§ 19.463 Loss of spirits from packages. ( a ) *Tampering or theft.* The appropriate TTB officer may require that a proprietor pay the tax on any loss caused by tampering or theft of spirits from packages in storage unless the proprietor establishes to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that the loss was not due to connivance, collusion, fraud or negligence on the part of the proprietor. As a general rule, the tax will be assessed on the quantity of spirits that represents the difference between the quantity originally entered in the package and the quantity remaining after discovery of the tampering or theft. However, if the proprietor can show that the package had already sustained normal storage losses before the tampering or theft occurred, the proprietor may exclude the amount of the normal storage losses from the quantity to be taxpaid.
( b ) *Alternative method of tax assessment.* If tampering or theft has occurred at a proprietor's plant and the proprietor has failed to use effective controls to prevent it, the appropriate TTB officer may use an alternative to the general method of tax assessment specified in paragraph (a) of this section. In this case, the appropriate TTB officer may assess on each package showing evidence of tampering or theft an amount equal to the tax on 5 proof gallons of spirits.
(26 U.S.C. 5006)
Su n Countr y Slo t Exemptio n Docket * FAA-2012-008 9 

# lilnitc d State s Senat e

WASHINGTON . D C 2051 0 Januar y 30.201 2 0 -'''—1— ' I h e Honorabl e Ra

y Lallood . Seereuir

y ^-O— ' U.S . Dcpartmcmo f

Transpiralio n ' " 120 0 No w Jerse y Avenue , SI

- 7ci ' Washingion , DC 2059 0 IX-a r Seeretar v La i lood ; W e wril e i n stron g suppor

t ol'Su n Country' s applicatio n lor sU n exemption s a

l th e Ronal d Reaga n Nationa l Airpor t (I)C'A) . ih e slo t

cxempiion s would allo w Su n Countr y t o continu e serx'ie e between Lansing . M

l an d Washington . IX" . Su n Counir> ' wa s origiiialK ' awarde d tw o within-periinete r slot cNcmption s a

t DC A i n Decembe

r oj'2010 . Whil e the airlin e wa s no t th e onl y applicant

to compete lor

thos e slo t exemptions , i

t wa s ihe onl y applicant

tha t me t all ihe criteri a.se

l fort h b \the Deparimon l o f

rransix)rlalit>n . I

n thi s ne w application . Su

n Countr y continue s t

o mee i thos e criteri aan

d als o demonstrate s the route' s viabilit

y wit h nearl y ayear' s wort

h o f supixirliv e evidence . Sinc e non-.sto p servic e betwee n Lansin g an

d DC A commence d o

n Apri l 1 . 2011 , ihe route ha s prove n l o b e asucces s wit h astead y increas e o f

dail \passenger s utilizin g the ser \ice . I n addition . Su

n Countr y ha s provide d passenger s wit

h mor e option s an

d cheape r fares . Clearh . lra\eler s ar e takin g advantag e o f

an d beneHtin g fro

mthe l.ansing-DC A route . I n order l o ensure tha

i thi s valuabl e servic e i s no t interrupted , w e ask

fo r a n expeditiou s re \ie

w olSu n Country' s application . W e appreciat e you

r consideratio n oflhi s request . IMeas e d o no t hcsiiai c to contac t

u s if yo u hav e an y question s o r

concerns . Sincerelv . 

# .j8tJ t ^^M^^'^ ^ Debbi e Slabeno w Ciir l Le\i n
#### McIntosh v. Commonwealth.

Oct. 6, 1942.

Moss Noble for appellant.

*477Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and W. Owen Keller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee'.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

— Reversing.

Elmer McIntosh and Fred Combs were indicted for robbery in Breathitt County. They were found guilty on their joint trial and both were sentenced to two years in the penitentiary. McIntosh is insisting that the judgment be reversed because the trial court erred in failing to give an instruction covering his theory of the case to the effect that he took parts of a shotgun to keep the prosecuting witness, Steve McIntosh, son of Pierce McIntosh, from shooting him and Fred Combs.

Combs had been going to see a daughter of Pierce McIntosh for some time prior to the day of the alleged robbery when he and the appellant went to the home of Pierce. Only a group of the McIntosh children were present when the two arrived. They were "there only a short while when a difficulty arose between Steve McIntosh and Combs. During the difficulty Steve grabbed a single-barrel shotgun and started out of the house and about the time he reached the yard Combs grabbed him and both fell to the ground. "While they were scuffling the gun came apart and the appellant picked up the barrel and the stock, leaving the wooden piece which fits under the barrel in the possession of Steve. Immediately after the scuffle the appellant and Combs left the McIntosh premises. The appellant took the two pieces of the shotgun with him. According to Elmer’s testimony and that of Willie Bush, who lived a short distance down the creek from the home of Pierce McIntosh, the pieces of the shotgun were left at the Bush home. Elmer testified that he took the parts of the shotgun to keep Steve from shooting him and Combs, and that he had no intention of converting them to his own use. He said also that he asked Bush to tell Pierce McIntosh to come and get the gun parts. In addition to testifying that the parts of the gun were left with him by the appellant, Bush said that two or three days thereafter he told Steve what Elmer had said and that Steve said that he did not want the parts of the gun, that he was going to get more than that out of it, and that he would shoot the man who brought them back. ' ■

The instructions did not cover the appellant’s theory of the case and the Commonwealth concedes that *478such an instruction should have been given. Both sides agree that the cases of Southland et al. v. Commonwealth, 217 Ky. 94, 288 S. W. 1051, and Lunce v. Commonwealth, 232 Ky. 214, 22 S. W. (2d) 629, are in point. In this case, as in those, the accused admitted one or more of the essential elements of the offense charged, but attempted to avoid conviction by proving facts and circumstances to excuse what he did; under such circumstances his theory of the case should be covered in a special instruction.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment should be and it is reversed, with directions to set it aside and for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
§ 675.22 Employment provided by a Federal, State, or local public agency, or a private nonprofit organization. ( a ) If a student is employed by a Federal, State, or local public agency, or a private nonprofit organization, the work that the student performs must be in the public interest.
( b ) *FWS employment in the public interest.* The Secretary considers work in the public interest to be work performed for the national or community welfare rather than work performed to benefit a particular interest or group. Work is not in the public interest if— ( 1 ) It primarily benefits the members of a limited membership organization such as a credit union, a fraternal or religious order, or a cooperative;
( 2 ) It is for an elected official who is not responsible for the regular administration of Federal, State, or local government;
( 3 ) It is work as a political aide for any elected official;
( 4 ) A student's political support or party affiliation is taken into account in hiring him or her;
( 5 ) It involves any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or is associated with a faction in an election for public or party office; or
( 6 ) It involves lobbying on the Federal, State, or local level.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2753)
[52 FR 45770, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 32356, July 21, 1992; 59 FR 61419, Nov. 30, 1994]
### §2906. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter:

(1) The term "distortion" includes, but is not limited to, a subsidy.

(2) The term "foreign country" includes any foreign instrumentality. Any territory or possession of a foreign country that is administered separately for customs purposes, shall be treated as a separate foreign country.

(3) The term "GATT" means the GATT 1947 (as defined in section 3501(1)(A) of this title).

(4) The term "implementing bill" has the meaning given such term in section 2191(b)(1) of this title.

(5) The term "international trade" includes, but is not limited to—

(A) trade in both goods and services, and

(B) foreign direct investment by United States persons, especially if such investment has implications for trade in goods and services.

(6) The term "state trading enterprise" means—

(A) any agency, instrumentality, or administrative unit of a foreign country which—

(i) purchases goods or services in international trade for any purpose other than the use of such goods or services by such agency, instrumentality, administrative unit, or foreign country, or

(ii) sells goods or services in international trade; or

(B) any business firm which—

(i) is substantially owned or controlled by a foreign country or any agency, instrumentality, or administrative unit thereof,

(ii) is granted (formally or informally) any special or exclusive privilege by such foreign country, agency, instrumentality, or administrative unit, and

(iii) purchases goods or services in international trade for any purpose other than the use of such goods or services by such foreign country, agency, instrumentality, or administrative unit, or which sells goods or services in international trade.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1107, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1134; Pub. L. 103–465, title VI, §621(a)(5), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4993.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this part", meaning part 1 (§§1101 to 1107) of subtitle A of title I of Pub. L. 100–418, which enacted this chapter and amended sections 2131, 2133, and 2191 of this title. For complete classification of part 1 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsec. (a) of section 1107 of Pub. L. 100–418. Subsec. (b) of section 1107 of Pub. L. 100–418 amended sections 2131 and 2191 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Par. (3). Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "the GATT 1947 (as defined in section 3501(1)(A) of this title)" for "the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), see section 621(b) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1677k of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 477

 557

 584

 586

 574

 519

 480

 510

 460

 425

 483

 466

 504

 466

 497

 520

 572

 514

 657

 685

 664

 678

 636

 528

 493

 546

 510

 555

 554

 576

 550

 346

 364

 329

 322

 312

 315

 277

 274

 281

 301

 316

 338

 337

 328

 344

 326

 340

 377

 408

 392

 392

 412

 404

 391

 401

 410

 376

 390

 380

 368

 356

 403

 431

 451

 412

 411

 378

 359

 363

 358

 350

 394

 402

 410

 406

 407

 410

 416

 420

 461

 464

 461

 483

 476

 442

 444

 455

 445

 439

 430

 437

 434

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:November 3, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 265

 282

 295

 271

 270

 250

 238

 240

 237

 232

 259

 264

 269

 267

 268

 269

 273

 276

 301

 303

 301

 314

 310

 289

 290

 297

 291

 287

 282

 286

 284

TOTAL 13,052

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS