alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nothing Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Anthony DeMint                                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 9, 2005
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Polaris Income Fund II (the Partnership)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  Report),  I,  William  R.
Carpenter,  President of Polaris Investment Management Corporation,  the General
Partner of the Partnership,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Partnership.


POLARIS AIRCRAFT INCOME FUND II
A California Limited Partnership
 (Registrant)
By: Polaris Investment Management Corporation,
    General Partner


By: /s/ William R. Carpenter
    ------------------------
    William R. Carpenter
    President
    March 31, 2003
§ 644.10 How many applications may an eligible applicant submit? ( a ) An applicant may submit more than one application for Educational Opportunity Centers grants as long as each application describes a project that serves a different target area or another designated different population.
( b ) For each grant competition, the Secretary designates, in the Federal Register notice inviting applications and other published application materials for the competition, the different populations for which an eligible entity may submit a separate application.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11, 1221e-3)
[75 FR 65781, Oct. 26, 2010]
#### Roy Miner v. O’Driscoll & Grove, Inc., et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 752.]
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 2 022

- 2885 LT Case No. 2015

- CA

- 1016

_____________________________ J OHN S. T URAN and M ERCEDES P. T URAN , A ppellant s,

v. S PECIALIZED L OAN S ERVIC ING LLC, P ROGRESSIVE I NSURANCE C OMPANY , as S UBROGEE of D ONNA V EZINA , U NITED S TATES of A MERICA , D EPARTMENT of THE T REASURY I NTERNAL R EVENUE S ERVICE , M ARY W ALDMAN , et al ., A ppellee s.

_____________________________ O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County

. Steven G. Rogers , Judge

. S cott A. Rosin, of Scott A. Rosin, P.A., Tampa , for Appellant s. C harles P. Gufford and Nicholas John Vanhook, of McCalla Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee , Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

. N o Appearance for Remaining Appellees. June 18, 20242 P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J., and S OUD and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .

_

____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Jeff L. Sanders, Senior VP & C.F.O., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Integrity Bancshares, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 

 
 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.November 7, 2005              /s/  Jeff L. Sanders   Jeff L. Sanders, Senior VP & C.F.O.   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 499

 505

 519

 547

 576

 585

 583

 590

 584

 576

 581

 606

 600

 592

 605

 624

 633

 741

 776

 785

 757

 787

 808

 892

 914

 972

 1,000

 1,053

 1,033

 1,047

 1,054

 466

 459

 463

 476

 482

 490

 493

 505

 512

 518

 495

 504

 509

 504

 507

 518

 501

 538

 556

 571

 574

 573

 625

 647

 655

 682

 695

 689

 725

 751

 747

 486

 485

 495

 508

 524

 544

 538

 543

 545

 549

 540

 548

 549

 548

 556

 568

 574

 622

 647

 667

 646

 669

 705

 731

 755

 787

 813

 842

 849

 883

 882

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Kenneth BosketKenneth BosketCEODated: March 9,  2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Crown Equity.
 
 /s/ Lowell HoldenLowell HoldenCFODated: March 9,  2011
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Crown Equity  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  2
C E R T I F I C A T E



    This is to certify that by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors
of Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation dated March 11, 1998,
the following vote was adopted and, as of the date of this Certificate,
has not been amended, modified or rescinded and is in full force and effect:

    "VOTED:  That the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial 
Officer are, or either one of them is, authorized to execute, personally 
or by attorney, in the name and on behalf of the Company, and to cause 
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company's Annual Report 
on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, in substantially 
the form submitted, but with such changes, additions and revisions as the
officer executing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively
evidenced by such execution and thereafter to execute personally, and to
cause to be filed, any amendments or supplements to such report and to do
any other acts and to execute and deliver any other documents necessary or
advisable in connection with the foregoing."

    This Consent has the same force and effect as a vote in favor of such
    action at a regular constituted meeting of the Board of Directors of
    the Company called for such purpose.

                                           Attest:


                                           /s/ Paula M. Anderson
                                               Paula M. Anderson
                                               Assistant Secretary
New Haven, Connecticut
March 19, 1998
CPB-05.3.2015-Exb10(b)






EXHIBIT 10(b)


Campbell Soup Company
Severance Pay Plan for Salaried Employees


WHEREAS, the Campbell Soup Company (“Company”) previously established the Campbell Soup Company Severance Pay Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Plan”) primarily to assist former U.S. Salaried Employees while seeking other employment; 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company reserves the right to amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan in any respect, at any time, and without notice; and
    
WHEREAS, the Chief Executive Officer desires to clarify the “Years of Service” definition to take into consideration the Company’s service bridging policy.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT:


RESOLVED, effective May 1, 2015, Article II, Section 2.11 of the Plan is amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:


2.11.    “Years of Service” means the total number of years of continuous employment rendered as a regular employee of the Company and all its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates since the employee’s most recent date of hire, plus any prior service included under the Company’s service bridging policy.  Solely applicable to the calculation of the severance payments set forth in Article V, Years of Service shall be full years; however, in the final year of employment, service of six full months or more will be counted as one year.


In addition to service with the Company, continuous years of employment with an enterprise, the assets or stock of which is acquired by the Company, shall be counted as years of service with the Company, unless Campbell Soup Company excludes such prior service with the acquired enterprise.  


    
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed on May 21, 2015.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:  /s/ Denise Morrison

	 
	 
	 
	        Denise Morrison
**Exhibit 23-A**

**Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3No. 333-139340) of Tech Data Corporation and in the related Prospectus, and 

(2) Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-62181,33-60479, 333-93801, 333-85509, 333-59198, 333-144298 and 333-161687) pertaining to the Tech Data Corporation incentive plans 

of our reportsdated March 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Tech Data Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Tech Data Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

March 24, 2010
§ 668.235 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this subpart: *Additional location* has the meaning given in 34 CFR 600.2.
*Advisory committee* is a group established by the oversight entity that provides nonbinding feedback to the oversight entity regarding the approval and operation of a prison education program within the oversight entity's jurisdiction.
*Confined or incarcerated individual* has the meaning given in 34 CFR 600.2.
*Feedback process* is the process developed by the oversight entity to gather nonbinding input from relevant stakeholders regarding the approval and operation of a prison education program within the oversight entity's jurisdiction. A feedback process may include an advisory committee.
*Oversight entity* means— ( 1 ) The appropriate State department of corrections or other entity that is responsible for overseeing correctional facilities; or
( 2 ) The Federal Bureau of Prisons.
*Relevant stakeholders* are individuals and organizations that provide input as part of a feedback process to the oversight entity regarding the approval and operation of a prison education program within the oversight entity's jurisdiction. These stakeholders must include representatives of confined or incarcerated individuals, organizations representing confined or incarcerated individuals, State higher education executive offices, and accrediting agencies and may include additional stakeholders as determined by the oversight entity.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spare Backup, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, I, Cery B. Perle,
Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 21, 2006
                               /s/  Cery B. Perle
                               ------------------
                               Cery B. Perle.
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal financial and accounting officer)


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Spare Backup, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### § 390.2 Who is eligible for assistance under this program?

Those agencies and organizations eligible for assistance under this program are described in 34 CFR 385.2.

(Authority: Section 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 772)
#### Beatrice Doerr, Respondent, v. Annina Bonaccolto et al., Appellants.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
November 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

1000 ACRE-FEET INFLOW RIVER PUMPING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHAN

GE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET PLANT C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

552.1

1 422.53 549.0 -3.2 652 1,614 0 493 123 28 0.10 0.00

2 422.17 545.9 -3.0 633 1,487 0 516 123 28 0.10 0.00

3 421.79 542.8 -3.2 701 1,645 0 516 113 25 0.09 0.00

4 421.48 540.2 -2.6 1,015 1,653 0 516 113 31 0.11 0.00

5 421.20 537.9 -2.3 1,086 1,583 0 514 116 45 0.16 0.15

6 420.88 535.2 -2.6 813 1,534 0 512 103 0 0.00 0.36

7 420.56 532.6 -2.6 801 1,498 0 514 91 25 0.09 0.00

8 420.35 530.9 -1.7 985 1,229 0 514 85 28 0.10 0.00

9 420.01 528.1 -2.8 760 1,542 0 514 93 22 0.08 0.00

10 419.66 525.2 -2.9 902 1,723 0 513 97 8 0.03 0.00

11 419.39 523.0 -2.2 1,120 1,592 0 512 104 22 0.08 0.00

12 419.13 520.9 -2.1 977 1,406 0 512 106 22 0.08 0.00

13 418.81 518.3 -2.6 733 1,410 0 512 100 19 0.07 0.00

14 418.50 515.8 -2.5 703 1,336 0 512 92 25 0.09 0.00

15 418.25 513.8 -2.0 835 1,247 0 512 91 3 0.01 0.04

16 417.90 511.0 -2.8 759 1,565 0 512 88 16 0.06 0.07

17 417.63 508.8 -2.2 841 1,325 0 512 90 3 0.01 0.03

18 417.45 507.4 -1.4 1,391 1,421 0 511 83 102 0.38 0.27

19 417.26 505.8 -1.5 1,414 1,561 0 510 83 27 0.10 0.00

20 417.03 504.0 -1.8 1,081 1,396 0 510 84 19 0.07 0.00

21 416.70 501.4 -2.6 725 1,446 0 510 86 3 0.01 0.00

22 416.45 499.4 -2.0 915 1,297 6 510 93 8 0.03 0.00

23 416.13 496.9 -2.5 785 1,430 0 510 97 27 0.10 0.00

24 415.79 494.2 -2.7 751 1,465 7 510 93 27 0.10 0.00

25 415.58 492.5 -1.6 1,333 1,534 8 510 92 21 0.08 0.00

26 415.33 490.6 -2.0 1,263 1,636 0 510 89 18 0.07 0.00

27 415.07 488.5 -2.0 1,033 1,443 6 508 87 18 0.07 0.00

28 414.86 486.9 -1.6 1,094 1,304 0 508 90 18 0.07 0.00

29 414.69 485.6 -1.3 1,375 1,424 0 508 92 18 0.07 0.00

30 414.39 483.2 -2.3 1,030 1,590 6 508 90 13 0.05 0.00

TOTALS -68.6 28,506 44,336 33 15,329 2,887 669 2.46 0.92

ACRE-FEET -

68,600

56,542 87,940 65 30,405 5,726 1,327

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 87,940 Outlet 30,405

Spill 65 Pumping Plant 5,726

Total = 124,137

Precipitation

This month = 0.92

October 01, 2023 To date = 2.11

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Folsom Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/10/2023
### §2131. Authorization of appropriation for GATT revision

There are authorized to be appropriated annually such sums as may be necessary for the payment by the United States of its share of the expenses of the Contracting Parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. This authorization does not imply approval or disapproval by the Congress of all articles of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §121, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 1986; Pub. L. 96–39, title XI, §1106(c)(2), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1107(b)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1135; Pub. L. 100–647, title IX, §9001(a)(1), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–647 substituted "There are" for "(d) There are".

Subsecs. (a) to (c). Pub. L. 100–418 struck out subsec. (a) which provided for bringing existing trade agreements into conformity with principles promoting open, nondiscriminatory, and fair world economic system, subsec. (b) which provided for agreements with foreign countries or instrumentalities, and subsec. (c) which provided for changes in Federal law through legislation implementing trade agreements.

1979—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–39 substituted "Such trade agreement may be entered into under section 2112 of this title" for "Such trade agreement may be submitted to the Congress for approval in accordance with the procedures of section 2191 of this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 applicable as if such amendment took effect on Aug. 23, 1988, see section 9001(b) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendments note under section 58c of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective July 26, 1979, see section 1114 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2581 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 115

 117

 117

 124

 134

 137

 139

 138

 136

 143

 145

 160

 180

 170

 169

 181

 174

 154

 156

 139

 144

 672

 1,047

 1,143

 1,362

 1,395

 2,087

 3,252

 3,557

 3,247

 3,226

 110

 109

 113

 117

 121

 117

 134

 132

 130

 125

 122

 123

 124

 125

 126

 127

 128

 130

 131

 132

 133

 135

 134

 136

 140

 142

 147

 164

 196

 274

 296

 113

 113

 115

 120

 126

 132

 137

 136

 133

 130

 129

 135

 140

 139

 142

 143

 141

 137

 137

 135

 137

 185

 239

 337

 425

 465

 627

 997

 1,309

 1,433

 1,480

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 214 Filed 11/04/19 Entered 11/05/19 12:08:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 214 Filed 11/04/19 Entered 11/05/19 12:08:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 214 Filed 11/04/19 Entered 11/05/19 12:08:39 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3