alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11117

Summary Calendar

LUISA FIGUEROA,

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

W ELAINE CHAPMAN, Warden, 

Respondent - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Texas at Fort Worth

USDC No. 4:08-CV-541

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luisa Figueroa is serving a life sentence, without the possibility of parole,

at the Federal Medical Center in Carswell, Texas. After learning she needs a

liver transplant, Figueroa filed a petition for compassionate release. See 28

U.S.C. § 2241. The district court denied Figueroa’s petition. We AFFIRM.

During the week of August 25, 2008, Figueroa’s physician informed her

that she was in need of a liver transplant and had only two months to live. On

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 21, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-11117

2

September 10, 2008, Figueroa filed a Section 2241 petition contending she has

a compatible donor ready and willing to undergo the transplant, but the Bureau

of Prisons (BOP) does not allow such procedures for inmates. 

Before filing a Section 2241 petition, Figueroa was required to exhaust her

administrative remedies. Rourke v. Thompson, 11 F.3d 47, 49 (5th Cir. 1993).

The BOP has a formal grievance procedure for federal inmates, like Figueroa,

to seek “formal review of an issue relating to any aspect of his/her own

confinement.” 28 C.F.R. § 542.10(a). Both in her petition and here on appeal,

Figueroa claimed the short notice regarding her medical condition made it

“impossible to utilize the Federal Bureau of Prison’s grievance procedure.”

Figueroa’s argument that she should not be required to pursue

administrative remedies assumes that the remedies would have been futile and

the delay fatal. There is nothing in the record suggesting that the BOP would

not have properly evaluated her request and given due consideration to a

properly supported plea. The district court did not err by requiring exhaustion.

Additionally, the district court found it could not grant her relief pursuant

to Section 2241 because her application was “not in reference to the imposed

sentence - but for medical needs.” We agree. A Section 2241 petition may be

granted if the inmate “is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or

treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). Figueroa does not allege

that such violation is present. She instead alleges that this application is for

compassionate release due to her medical needs. A compassionate release

request is not a matter of illegal or unconstitutional restraint. 

We AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Figueroa’s application.
#### Guy H. Montmartin, Respondent, v. Dupuis Process, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, J J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 202

 206

 191

 178

 180

 182

 194

 198

 203

 208

 218

 220

 236

 241

 240

 244

 332

 323

 311

 266

 281

 246

 245

 233

 233

 243

 236

 224

 225

 177

 170

 162

 160

 160

 163

 168

 176

 185

 194

 201

 208

 211

 215

 218

 220

 231

 229

 227

 224

 222

 221

 219

 213

 208

 203

 197

 192

 189

 186

 188

 173

 166

 169

 171

 178

 185

 193

 201

 209

 213

 217

 222

 223

 227

 249

 249

 247

 233

 232

 228

 228

 222

 219

 220

 211

 203

 201

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,903

 2,794

 2,690

 2,609

 2,555

 2,528

 2,510

 2,498

 2,494

 2,506

 2,540

 2,582

 2,627

 2,671

 2,708

 2,747

 2,823

 2,906

 2,984

 3,046

 3,100

 3,143

 3,178

 3,199

 3,209

 3,216

 3,210

 3,191

 3,169

 207

 200

 192

 186

 183

 181

 179

 178

 178

 179

 181

 184

 188

 191

 193

 196

 202

 208

 213

 218

 221

 225

 227

 229

 229

 230

 229

 228

 226

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket<greek-i> EPA-RO4-SFUND-2011-0278, FRL-9290-7]


National Starch and Chemical Company, Salisbury, Rowan County, 
North Carolina; Notice of Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of correction concerning location of Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register published March 18, 2011, FR9284, EPA 
posted a Notice of Settlement for past cost under Section 122(h)(1) of 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act (CERCLA), concerning the National Starch and Chemical Company Site 
located in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina. In the published 
notice the location of the Site is indicated in error as Mobile, Mobile 
County, Alabama. The Site is located in Salisbury, Rowan County, North 
Carolina.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
April 18, 2011. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2011-0278 or Site name National Starch and Chemical Company 
Superfund Site by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81d1e0e8eff5e4f3afd1e0f4ede0c1e4f1e0afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2e2d3dbdcc6d7c09ce2d3c7ded3f2d7c2d39cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-8177 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



IMPCO Technologies, Inc.

Cerritos, California



We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed open Registration Statements: (a) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 33-38649; (b) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 33-72008; (c) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-07035; (d) the
Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 33-62889; (e) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-44085; (f) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-71544; (g) the Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-102069; (h) the Registration Statement
Form S-8, No. 333-118689; of our reports dated March 28, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. internal control over financial reporting, which included an adverse opinion as to the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, and the schedule of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



BDO Seidman, LLP



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP  
|Los Angeles, California
|April 3, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 2,021

 1,942

 2,028

 2,029

 2,042

 2,037

 2,040

 1,888

 1,806

 1,762

 1,714

 1,723

 1,736

 493

 137

 0

 860

 357

 0

 0

 660

 0

 0

 1,284

 2,918

 3,396

 3,404

 3,410

 3,412

 3,384

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,761

 4,705

 3,837

 3,160

 982

 991

 2,527

 3,922

 3,917

 3,900

 3,826

 3,613

 4,038

 2,606

 0

 10,503

 3,872

 3,884

 5,525

 5,369

 10,763

 11,854

 13,260

 6,950

 7,363

 4,873

 4,882

 7,618

 8,727

 8,727

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 FEDERAL-STATE OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 12, 2006

TOTAL

TOTALS 48,483 0 0

STATE

 2,021

 1,942

 2,028

 2,029

 2,042

 2,037

 2,040

 1,888

 1,806

 1,762

 1,714

 1,723

 1,736

 493

 137

 0

 860

 357

 0

 0

 660

 0

 0

 1,284

 2,918

 3,396

 3,404

 3,410

 3,412

 3,384

 5,761

 4,705

 3,837

 3,160

 982

 991

 2,527

 3,922

 3,917

 3,900

 3,826

 3,613

 4,038

 2,606

 0

 10,503

 3,872

 3,884

 5,525

 5,369

 10,763

 11,854

 13,260

 6,950

 7,363

 4,873

 4,882

 7,618

 8,727

 8,727

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,968

 7,220

 4,409

 3,271

 3,368

 3,127

 4,398

 5,200

 4,870

 3,849

 2,989

 3,892

 4,069

 3,690

 3,374

 4,379

 3,872

 3,872

 5,823

 6,397

 6,900

 7,901

 9,448

 5,500

 6,694

 6,839

 7,401

 7,356

 7,504

 8,277

 161,955

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5,968

 7,220

 4,409

 3,271

 3,368

 3,127

 4,398

 5,200

 4,870

 3,849

 2,989

 3,892

 4,069

 3,690

 3,374

 4,379

 3,872

 3,872

 5,823

 6,397

 6,900

 7,901

 9,448

 5,500

 6,694

 6,839

 7,401

 7,356

 7,504

 8,277

FED STATE

TRACY PUMPING

FED TOTAL

DELTA 

PUMPING PLANT

CLIFT

COURT

TOTAL

 5,933

 4,942

 3,966

 2,837

 982

 991

 2,462

 3,965

 3,960

 3,965

 3,955

 3,958

 3,951

 3,942

 3,952

 5,345

 3,958

 5,435

 5,439

 5,455

 8,932

 11,875

 11,883

 6,929

 7,427

 4,938

 4,946

 7,425

 8,727

 8,727

 48,483 161,202 161,955

FED

BANKS

XVC

 0

STATE

DOS

AMIGOS

XVC

 0

BYRON

BETHANY

TOTAL

 0

AQEDUCT CHECK 21

STATE FED TOTAL

DMC-POOL

DEMANDS

 481

 461

 402

 321

 13

 142

 190

 74

 286

 562

 433

 339

 378

-46

-50

-38

 751

 134

-173

-295

 630

 0

 0

 1,284

 597

 414

 412

 1,145

 1,298

 1,072

 161,857 0 161,857 11,217

COMMENTS: ALL VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

Table 20 

TOTAL TRACY: Apr 2006 verified with SLDMWA Sheet.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND THE
SUMMARY OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CONTAINED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K TO
WHICH THIS EXHIBIT IS ATTACHED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        238,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 487,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   22,500
<INVENTORY>                                   494,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,227,800
<PP&E>                                      4,536,100
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,899,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,541,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         536,800
<BONDS>                                       773,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     3,200
<COMMON>                                       50,600
<OTHER-SE>                                    735,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,541,600
<SALES>                                     4,582,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,584,100
<CGS>                                       4,179,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,181,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             77,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               115,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   43,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            72,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (23,300)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   45,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .72



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7329]

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a meeting of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) to prepare for the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunication Conference and the Radiocommunication Assembly.

The ITAC will meet to begin preparation of advice for the U.S.   government for the ITU World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC), which   will be held in January 23-February 17, 2012 in Geneva, Switzerland. The Radiocommunication Assembly will be held in Geneva the preceding week, January 16-20, 2012.

                        The ITAC will meet from 10 am to 12 pm on Wednesday, April 21, 2011 at 1200 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209. This meeting is open to the public as seating capacity allows. The public will have an opportunity to provide comments at this meeting. Any requests for reasonable accommodation   should be made at least 7 days before the meeting. All such requests will   be considered, however, requests made after date might not be possible to   fill. Those desiring further information may contact the Secretariat at                         *jillsonad@state.gov mailto:jillsonad@state.gov*                         or at 202 647-2592.                    

Dated: March 25, 2011.

Cecily C. Holiday,

International Communications & Information Policy, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-7766 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         513,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,504,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,509,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,843,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,504,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               961,590
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               969,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(No. 76-CC-2837

#### Winzeler Trucking Company, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed February 15, 1978.*

Polos, C.J.

This cause is before the Court following oral argument on the cross motions of the parties for summary judgment.

The claim herein arises out of a contract which Claimant entered into in 1974 with the Martin Marietta Corporation, to provide truck transportation for road building supplies to the site of a State highway construction project. The Rock Roads Construction Company was the primary contractor on the job, and it had subcontracted certain work to Martin Marietta Corporation, which in turn has entered into the aforesaid contract with Claimant.

*192Claimant alleges that it lost substantial sums on the contract because it contracted much of its trucking with other firms, and had to pay increased rates to them when the Illinois Commerce Commission authorized a number of increases in freight rates during the course of the contract. Claimant further alleges that it was unable to pass on the increased rates because of Section 109.20 of the Department of Transporation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, which allows increases in rates for railroad and barges to be passed on to the State, while not providing for such increases to be passed on from trucking firms.

Claimant alleges that Section 109.20 violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Federal Constitution, and seeks damages in the amount of his losses under the contract.

On consideration of the cross motions for summary judgment filed herein, the memorandums of the parties in support of and in opposition to those motions, and the oral arguments had in this cause, the Court finds that there are no disputed issues of material fact.

The Court further finds that as a matter of law, Claimant has no cause of action against the State of Illinois for his losses under his contract with Martin Marietta Corporation, as the State of Illinois was not a party to that contract.

The Court further finds that as a matter of law, it has no jurisdiction to determine whether Section 109.20 of the Department of Transporation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction is unconstitutional.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant’s motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is denied, and *193Respondent’s motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, granted, and this cause is accordingly dismissed.
#### Thomas Smith, an Infant, by Michael Smith, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. F. W. Devoe and C. T. Raynolds Company, Respondent.

Order setting aside verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton'and Putnam, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.101 Bonds in general. ( a ) *Requirement.* A bond must be filed by each person claiming drawback on a monthly basis. Persons who claim drawback on a quarterly basis are not required to file bonds. The bond requirement of this part may be satisfied either by a bond obtained from an authorized surety company or by deposit of collateral security.
( b ) *Bond form.* The bond must be prepared and executed on TTB Form 5154.3, Bond for Drawback Under 26 U.S.C. 5111, in accordance with the provisions of this part and the instructions printed on the form.
( c ) *Bonds executed before July 1, 2008.* On and after July 1, 2008, a reference to 26 U.S.C. 5131-5134 in a bond executed on TTB Form 5154.3, Bond for Drawback Under 26 U.S.C. 5131, shall be understood to refer to the sections redesignated as 26 U.S.C. 5111-5114 by section 11125 of Public Law 109-59.
( d ) *Approval.* The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to approve all bonds and consents of surety required by this part.
[T.D. TTB, 74 FR 37402, July 28, 2009]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Public
Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted)
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 In Witness Whereof th
 /s/ BARRY D. QUART, PHARM.D.

Barry D. Quart, Pharm.D.
    
    
    
    /s/ DENIS HICKEY

Denis HickeyChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer