alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNothing Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 113 (Thursday, June 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 33751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13806]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Intent to Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

    Pursuant to Section 2(e)(7)(B) of the Ex-Im Charter, this notice is 
to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of the United States 
has received an application for a $100 million guarantee to support the 
export of up to $117.6 million in U.S. equipment and services for 
fertilizer production in Morocco.
    The U.S. exports will support the Moroccan producer's long-term 
modernization plans. Parts of those efforts include an expansion of 
production capacity at four diammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer 
processing plants by a total of 4 million metric tons of DAP per year. 
The new foreign production will be sold globally.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20571, attention Policy and Planning Division, within 14 
days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Helene Walsh,
Vice President, Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-13806 Filed 6-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
§ 373.24 What are the special requirements pertaining to the protection, use, and release of personal information? ( a ) All personal information about individuals served by any project under this part, including lists of names, addresses, photographs, and records of evaluation, must be confidential.
( b ) The use of information and records concerning individuals must be limited only to purposes directly connected with the project, including project reporting and evaluation activities. This information may not be disclosed, directly or indirectly, other than in the administration of the project unless the consent of the agency providing the information and the individual to whom the information applies, or his or her representative, has been obtained in writing. The Secretary or other Federal officials responsible for enforcing legal requirements have access to this information without written consent being obtained. The final products of the project may not reveal any personal identifying information without written consent of the individual or his or her representative.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 303(b)(2)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), and 773(b)(2)(B))
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5272 

To amend the Small Business Act to require lenders to refer certain borrowers 

to a small business development center, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 26, 2019 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ (for herself, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. LOWENTHAL, 

Mrs. TORRES of California, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. COX of California, 

and Mr. CISNEROS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to require lenders to 

refer certain borrowers to a small business development 

center, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Entre5 preneurs and Economic Development Act’’ or the ‘‘SEED 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5272 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER REFER2 RALS. 

3 Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 636(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

5 new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(36) SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER

7 REFERRALS.—If a lender determines that a bor8 rower is not eligible for a loan under this subsection, 

9 such lender shall refer the borrower to a small busi10 ness development center. Such referral shall in11 clude— 

12 ‘‘(A) the address, phone number, and 

13 website (if available) of such center; and 

14 ‘‘(B) a description of the services offered 

15 by such center.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

NORFOLK DIVISION

____________________________________ 

In re: ) 

 ) 

KENT DAVID BURSTEIN, ) 

 ) Case No. 19-72463-FJS 

 Debtor. ) 

____________________________________) 

 ) 

YVETTE NONTE, ) 

 ) APN 20-07016-FJS 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

KENT DAVID BURSTEIN, ) 

 ) Chapter 7 

 Defendant. ) 

____________________________________) 

ORDER ENTERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUA SPONTE 

 On March 24, 2022, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order granting partial 

summary judgment in favor of Yvette Nonte that a confessed judgment entered in her favor by the 

Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland against Kent David Burstein (the “Debt”) is 

nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) as a debt to a former spouse incurred in 

connection with a separation agreement and divorce. The Court simultaneously entered a separate 

order giving the parties notice that it would consider the liquidation of the nondischargeable Debt 

on summary judgment sua sponte at a hearing held on May 10, 2022. 

 For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion issued in the above-captioned case on 

June 15, 2022, the Court enters summary judgment sua sponte that the nondischargeable Debt 

owed by Kent David Burstein to Yvette Nonte is $382,084.71, inclusive of interest and fees. 

The Clerk shall deliver copies of this Order to Steven L. Brown, counsel for Yvette Nonte; 

Case 20-07016-FJS Doc 88 Filed 06/15/22 Entered 06/15/22 15:34:19 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Entered on Docket: Jun 15 2022

Case 20-07016-FJS Doc 88 Filed 06/15/22 Entered 06/15/22 15:34:19 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Eugene Eichler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Save the World Air, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 3, 2004 /s/ EUGENE EICHLEREugene EichlerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brent M. Cook, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser Technologies, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: July 26, 2006 |  |  |  | /S/ BRENT M. COOK                                    
|                    |  |  |  | Brent M. Cook                                        
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William Dwyer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raser
Technologies, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: July 26, 2006 |  |  |  | /S/ WILLIAM DWYER                                                                      
|                    |  |  |  | William Dwyer                                                                          
|                    |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Raser Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Raser Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed
as part of the Form 10-Q.
Certificate Number: 15725-VAE-CC-034420650

15725-VAE-CC-034420650

CERTIFICATE OF COUNSELING

I CERTIFY that on May 5, 2020, at 4:47 o'clock PM EDT, Kathleen M. Donovan

received from 001 Debtorcc, Inc., an agency approved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 111

to provide credit counseling in the Eastern District of Virginia, an individual [or

group] briefing that complied with the provisions of 11 U.S.C. 109(h) and 111.

A debt repayment plan was not prepared. If a debt repayment plan was prepared, a

copy of the debt repayment plan is attached to this certificate.

This counseling session was conducted by internet.

Date: May 5, 2020 By: /s/Angela Rosa

Name: Angela Rosa

Title: Counselor

* Individuals who wish to file a bankruptcy case under title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy

Code are required to file with the United States Bankruptcy Court a completed certificate of

counseling from the nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency that provided the individual

the counseling services and a copy of the debt repayment plan, if any, developed through the

credit counseling agency. See 11 U.S.C. 109(h) and 521(b).

Case 20-32904-KLP Doc 3 Filed 07/08/20 Entered 07/08/20 12:10:56 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 1031 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2011

-NE

- 27

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Inspection 2.5 $ 212.50 $11,025 $11,237.50 

### 16 $179,800.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $179,800 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 0
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( U se this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulato ry action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: 

### This AD affects only 16 engines in the US. No one operator own s more than 3 affected engines. **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific re quirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
### §§273, 274. Repealed. Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §4(b), 67 Stat. 509

Sections, R.S. §§2885, 2886, required the containers of imported liquors or distilled spirits to be marked or scored at the port of landing with the capacity, wine gallons, proof, proof gallons, and other detailed information, such marks to be obliterated upon sale.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Act Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §1, 67 Stat. 507, provided that such act is effective, except as otherwise specifically provided for, on and after the thirtieth day following the date of its enactment (Aug. 8, 1953).

The exception "except as otherwise specifically provided for" apparently refers to the amendments made to the provisions preceding subd. (1) of section 1308 of this title and to section 1557(b) of this title, for which separate effective dates were provided as explained in notes under those sections.

#### Savings Provision

For savings provision generally providing that the repeal or modification of existing law by act Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, would not affect acts, rights, or civil or criminal proceedings commenced prior to such act, see section 23 of act Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, set out as a note under section 1304 of this title.
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 9
Case 20-30776-KRH Doc 42 Filed 05/22/20 Entered 05/28/20 08:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 202

 196

 206

 282

 563

 619

 686

 664

 558

 444

 389

 330

 330

 356

 308

 268

 254

 226

 303

 365

 305

 287

 327

 338

 301

 244

 285

 258

 255

 306

 345

 165

 167

 171

 175

 184

 190

 187

 194

 195

 198

 192

 185

 177

 171

 169

 167

 170

 170

 168

 168

 154

 156

 156

 158

 157

 149

 147

 149

 155

 161

 161

 173

 176

 180

 195

 244

 251

 266

 269

 266

 256

 248

 232

 223

 201

 189

 183

 183

 186

 197

 212

 191

 184

 196

 209

 200

 182

 178

 186

 195

 190

 194

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,399

 2,402

 2,410

 2,434

 2,508

 2,587

 2,685

 2,785

 2,881

 2,968

 3,043

 3,102

 3,152

 3,180

 3,196

 3,203

 3,206

 3,197

 3,150

 3,111

 3,036

 2,951

 2,881

 2,834

 2,786

 2,736

 2,691

 2,676

 2,682

 2,689

 2,700

 171

 172

 172

 174

 179

 185

 192

 199

 206

 212

 217

 222

 225

 227

 228

 229

 229

 228

 225

 222

 217

 211

 206

 202

 199

 195

 192

 191

 192

 192

 193

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §332. Debasement of coins; alteration of official scales, or embezzlement of metals

If any of the gold or silver coins struck or coined at any of the mints of the United States shall be debased, or made worse as to the proportion of fine gold or fine silver therein contained, or shall be of less weight or value than the same ought to be, pursuant to law, or if any of the scales or weights used at any of the mints or assay offices of the United States shall be defaced, altered, increased, or diminished through the fault or connivance of any officer or person employed at the said mints or assay offices, with a fraudulent intent; or if any such officer or person shall embezzle any of the metals at any time committed to his charge for the purpose of being coined, or any of the coins struck or coined at the said mints, or any medals, coins, or other moneys of said mints or assay offices at any time committed to his charge, or of which he may have assumed the charge, every such officer or person who commits any of the said offenses shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §280 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §166, 35 Stat. 1120).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
#### § 76.707 When obligations are made.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339, Aug. 29, 2024.

The following table shows when a State or a subgrantee makes obligations for various kinds of property and services.

| If the obligation is for— | The obligation is made— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Acquisition of real or personal property | On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property. |
| (b) Personal services by an employee of the State or subgrantee | When the services are performed. |
| (c) Personal services by a contractor who is not an employee of the State or subgrantee | On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to obtain the services. |
| (d) Performance of work other than personal services | On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to obtain the work. |
| (e) Public utility services | When the State or subgrantee receives the services. |
| (f) Travel | When the travel is taken. |
| (g) Rental of real or personal property | When the State or subgrantee uses the property. |
| (h) A pre-agreement cost that was properly approved by the Secretary under the cost principles in 2 CFR part 200, Subpart E—Cost Principles | On the first day of the grant or subgrant performance period. |

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 6511(a))

[45 FR 22517, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 55 FR 14817, Apr. 18, 1990; 57 FR 30342, July 8, 1992; 79 FR 76094, Dec. 19, 2014]