Eric C. Howlett, VSB No. 82237 

Klementina V. Pavlova, VSB No. 92942 

SANDS ANDERSON PC

P.O. Box 1998 

Richmond, Virginia 23218-1998 

Telephone: (804) 648.1636 

Facsimile: (804) 783-7291 

Email: ehowlett@sandsanderson.com 

 kpavlova@sandsanderson.com 

 Counsel for Zachary Becker 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: TA-VON BECKER, Case No.: 20-33765-KLP 

Chapter 13 

Debtor. 

ZACHARY BECKER, 

Movant, 

v. 

TA-VON BECKER, 

SUZANNE E. WADE, Chapter 13 Trustee, 

and 

LYNN L. TAVENNER, Chapter 7 Trustee, 

Respondents. 

AMENDED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY 

COMES NOW Zachary Becker ("Mr. Becker"), by counsel, spouse of Ta-Von Becker 

(the "Debtor"), pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 362(b)(2) & (d)(1) and Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure 9014 and 4001 and files this Amended Motion for Relief from the 

Automatic Stay (the “Amended Motion”) to allow Mr. Becker to continue a state court 

proceeding. In support of this Amended Motion, Mr. Becker states as follow: 

Jurisdiction and Venue 

1. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157, and the Court has 

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 15
2 

2. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 

Preliminary Statement 

3. This matter is before the Court on the Amended Motion related to the Motion for 

Relief from Automatic Stay (“Motion for Relief”) (doc. no. 49) filed by Mr. Becker, the Debtor’s 

Objection to Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (“Objection”) (doc. no. 52), and Mr. 

Becker’s Reply to Objection to Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (“Reply”) (doc. 

no. 53). The subject of these pleadings is a Complaint in the Circuit Court of the County of 

Chesterfield seeking divorce from the Debtor. Becker v. Becker, CL20-3412 (Va. Cir. Ct.) 

(the “Divorce Proceedings”). 

4. Mr. Becker requests that the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 be 

modified for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) to allow Mr. Becker to proceed with the Divorce 

Proceedings and allow the state court to enter any orders, judgments or decrees necessary or 

proper to that end, including the dissolution of the marriage, division of property, and 

determination of support, if appropriate, between the Debtor and Mr. Becker. 

5. On July 7, 2021, the Court held a hearing on the Motion for Relief and related 

pleadings and continued the hearing to August 4, 2021, to allow Mr. Becker's Chapter 7 Trustee 

to be added as a party to the matter. 

6. Lynn L. Tavenner, who serves as the chapter 7 Trustee in Mr. Becker's case has 

been added as a party to the Amended Motion and has consented to the relief requested herein. 

Further, the chapter 13 Trustee for the Debtor, has also consented to modifying the stay to allow 

the Divorce Proceedings to continue in state court. 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 15
3 

7. As described below, neither the Debtor's estate, nor any other party in interest, 

will be prejudiced or harmed by a modification of the stay imposed by § 362 of the Bankruptcy 

Code to allow Mr. Becker to proceed with the Divorce Proceedings. 

Background 

8. On September 9, 2020, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition seeking relief under 

Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Suzanne E. Wade was appointed Chapter 13 Trustee and 

continues to serve in that capacity. 

9. Debtor was legally married at the time this case was filed. However, the marriage 

is unsupportable, and the parties have irreconcilable differences; therefore, Mr. Becker has filed, 

an action to dissolve the marriage in state court. The Divorce Proceedings involve the dissolution 

of the marriage of Mr. Becker and the Debtor, division of property, and determination of support. 

10. The Debtor recently completed a chapter 7 case. The Debtor's prior chapter 7 case 

was filed on October 3, 2019 (Case No. 19-35196), she received her discharge on 

January 9, 2020, and the case has since been closed. The Debtor filed the instant case on 

September 9, 2020, less than eight months after receiving her chapter 7 discharge. 

11. Mr. Becker filed a chapter 13 petition on November 21, 2018 (Case No. 18-

35875), which was converted to chapter 7 on the request of the chapter 13 trustee. (Case No. 18-

35875; Doc. 22). Mr. Becker received his discharge on November 13, 2019, and is looking 

forward to moving forward with his life. 

Applicable Law and Argument 

12. Relief from this stay is permitted by the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362(d) which 

states in pertinent part: 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 15
4 

"(d) On request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, 

the court shall grant relief from the stay provided under subsection 

(a) of this section, such as by terminating, annulling, modifying, or 

conditioning such stay -- 

(1) for cause, including the lack of adequate protection of an 

interest in property of such party in interest . . . ." 

13. To make this determination bankruptcy courts apply the balancing test followed 

in the Fourth Circuit and enunciated in In re Robbins, 964 F.2d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 1992). The 

Robbins test considers the type of claim(s) being asserted, how to best serve judicial economy 

and the impact that relief from the stay would have on the debtor's estate. Id. The legislative 

history of § 362 explains that "cause may be established by a single factor such as ‘a desire to 

permit an action to proceed . . . in another tribunal '" H.R. Rep. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess., 343-

344 (1977) (emphasis added). 

14. The court must "balance potential prejudice to the bankruptcy debtor's estate 

against the hardships that will be incurred by the person seeking relief from the automatic stay if 

relief is denied." Id. (citing In re Peterson, 116 B.R. 247, 249 (D. Colo. 1990)). 

15. While the initial burden rests on Mr. Becker to establish a prima facie case to 

show that "cause", once Mr. Becker meets his burden of establishing a prima facie case, the 

burden shifts to the Debtor to show that "cause" does not exist to lift the stay. Unnamed Citizens 

A Thru E and Certain Minor Children v. White (In re White), 410 B.R. 195, 201 (Bankr. W.D. 

Va. 2008). 

16. Here, the above factors weigh heavily in favor of lifting the stay. First, the 

Divorce Proceedings involve only issues of state law and deal with events that took place before 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 15
5 

the filing of the Debtor's bankruptcy petition. Thus, the expertise of the bankruptcy court is not 

required. 

17. Second, lifting the stay will promote judicial economy. The Divorce Proceedings 

will substantially focus on real estate commonly known as 12606 West Wood Sage Drive, 

Midlothian, Virginia 23114 (“West Wood Property”), which is owned by Debtor and Mr. 

Becker as tenants by the entirety. The West Wood Property is no longer at issue in Mr. Becker’s 

bankruptcy proceeding, and it is likewise not material in these bankruptcy proceedings. 

18. Courts have permitted state courts to adjudicate equitable distribution in similar 

circumstances. In Philips v. Sanchez (In re Sanchez), Case No. 97-35971-T, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 

2228 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1997), for example, a chapter 7 trustee filed a complaint to sell 

certain residential real property owned by debtor and his nondebtor spouse as tenants by the 

entirety. The issue before the court was whether to allow sale and turnover of the property before 

equitable distribution is determined by the state court in which the divorce between debtor and 

spouse is currently pending. In re Sanchez, at *6. The Court held that it "has no desire to become 

involved in the adjudication of family law matters since such issues are best left to a court with 

expertise in these areas." Id. at *6 citing See Davis v. Davis (In re Davis), 133 B.R. 593 (Bankr. 

E.D. Va. 1991); see also Robbins v. Robbins (In re Robbins), 964 F.2d 342, 345-46 (4th Cir. 

1992). The state court is the appropriate forum with the expertise to adjudicate a family law 

matter and the state court is better equipped to deal with such disputes. In In re Sanchez, the 

Court reasoned that "until the property is equitably apportioned by the state court, it is 

impossible to establish if the trustee has met the elements of § 363(h)" and therefore granted 

leave for the parties to proceed before the state court for equitable distribution. In re Sanchez, at

*6. 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 15
6 

19. While it is true that Mr. Becker can obtain dissolution of the marriage without 

relief from stay, the state court would not consider support issues on a permanent basis until 

equitable distribution has been determined. 

20. Third, relief will have limited impact on the estate. The Debtor has very few 

unsecured creditors and is attempting to catch up the mortgage arrears on the Heather Crossing 

property, in which she has solely resided since September, 2019. Pursuant to her confirmed 

Plan, she has only pledged to pay three percent (3%) to unsecured creditors. 

21. The bar date has passed, and based on the claims register, only twelve creditors 

filed claims for a total amount of $378,732.18. Of that amount approximately $6,250.04 is for 

unsecured debts. Even after the Debtor completes her case in five years, she will still be 

personally obligated to those unsecured creditors, as she is not eligible for a discharge. 

22. The Debtor's chapter 13 plan provides that the payments on the West Wood 

Property will be made outside of bankruptcy, but the Debtor is not making those payments, only 

Mr. Becker is. 

23. The factors enumerated in Robbins clearly weigh in favor of lifting the stay for 

cause under § 362(d)(1). 

24. In sum, the hardships that will be incurred by the Mr. Becker if relief from the 

automatic stay is denied far outweighs any potential prejudice to the Debtor’s estate. Good cause 

therefore exists to grant relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d). 

25. As mentioned above, the Debtor is in her first year of the case and the success of 

her case does not depend on the Divorce Proceedings. The debtor cannot get a discharge in this 

chapter 13 case, and she has approximately $6,250.04 of unsecured debt. 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 15
7 

26. While the West Wood Property is currently owed by Mr. Becker and the Debtor 

as tenants by the entirety, once the marriage is dissolved, the tenancy by the entirely is 

automatically destroyed. However, because bankruptcy exemptions are claimed at the filing of 

the case, the Debtor would not lose her exemption upon the dissolution of the marriage. In re 

Lane, No. 17-70336, 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1992, at *8 (Bankr. W.D. Va. July 19, 2017) ("the 

general rule that exemptions are to be determined as of the date of the bankruptcy petition."). 

27. Mr. Becker, on the other hand, has finished his payments to the chapter 7 trustee 

and his case will be closed in due course after the chapter 7 trustee finishes the administrative 

part of the case. He purchased the West Wood Property prior to the marriage, and he maintains 

all required mortgage payments on the residence and utility payments. 

28. Therefore, the scale tips in favor of lifting the stay when balancing the potential 

prejudice of the Debtor's estate against the hardships of Mr. Becker if stay relief is denied. The 

Debtor and the estate will be undisturbed by the proceeding. 

29. There are no joint debts and spousal support, if any, cannot be adjudicated on a 

final basis until equitable distribution has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. 

For that to happen Mr. Becker seeks modification of the automatic stay to proceed in state court. 

30. Creditors are already negatively impacted by the bankruptcy case, which will not 

change if the stay is modified. 

31. In addition, both Mr. Becker’s Chapter 7 Trustee and the Debtor’s Chapter 13 

Trustee have consented to the relief requested. 

32. Regardless of how the state court decides the equitable distribution, the estate and 

the creditors are not impacted. Therefore, any delay in the Divorce Proceedings is unwarranted 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 15
8 

and would be highly prejudicial to Mr. Becker when there would be no prejudice to the Debtor or 

her creditors. 

33. Mr. Becker urges the Bankruptcy Court to let the state court adjudicate the family 

issues between the parties, in addition to equitable distribution, but would be prepared to file an 

adversary proceeding to let this court adjudicate the equitable distribution of the property. 

34. Alternatively, this Court may decide to allow the state court to make a 

determination of the property rights of the spouses, but reserve the power to control disposition 

or distribution of the property. This may be done by modifying the automatic stay as in In re 

Wilson, 85 B.R. 722 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988). In In re Wilson, the Court allowed the state court to 

decide the property rights of the marital couple, but the Bankruptcy Court to administer the 

debtor's estate. Therefore, once the decree is entered, the parties will have to return to the 

Bankruptcy Court so that implementation of that decree can be made in a manner consistent with 

the rights of the Debtor, trustee, and all creditors. 

35. Mr. Becker respectfully requests that the Court treat this amended motion as 

written memorandum of points and authorities or waive any requirement that this amended 

motion be accompanied by a written memorandum as described in Rule 9013-1(G) of the Local 

Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Eastern District of Virginia. 

WHEREFORE, Mr. Becker requests that this Court enter an Order, substantially in the 

form attached hereto as Exhibit A, granting him relief from the automatic stay to proceed with 

the prosecution of an action in State Court to exercise all permissible rights and remedies for 

dissolution of the marriage, division of property, and determination of support, as appropriate. 

Mr. Becker further requests that the fourteen (14) day stay imposed pursuant to the provisions of 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 15
9 

Bankruptcy Rule 4001(a)(3) be waived, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems 

just and proper. 

Respectfully submitted, this 21st day of July, 2021. 

ZACHARY BECKER 

 /s/ Klementina V. Pavlova

Eric C. Howlett, VSB No. 82237 

Klementina V. Pavlova, VSB No. 92942 

SANDS ANDERSON PC

P.O. Box 1998 

Richmond, Virginia 23218-1998 

Telephone: (804) 648.1636 

Facsimile: (804) 783-7291 

Email: ehowlett@sandsanderson.com 

 kpavlova@sandsanderson.com 

Counsel for Zachary Becker 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 15
10 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 21st day of July, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

James H. Wilson, Jr., Esquire 

Email: jameswilson29@gmail.com 

 Counsel for the Debtor 

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee 

Email: trustee@ch13ricva.com 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

Elizabeth Cabell Brogan, Esquire 

Email: e.brogan@ch13ricva.com 

 Counsel to the Chapter 13 Trustee 

Lynn L. Tavenner 

Tavenner & Beran, PLC 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Telephone: (804) 783-8300 

Facsimile: (804) 783-0178 

Chapter 7 Trustee for Zachary Becker 

And I hereby certify that I have mailed the document by U.S. mail to all parties on the attached 

list. 

 /s/ Klementina V. Pavlova 

4811-8432-3058 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 15
 Label Matrix for local noticing Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capi 

 0422-3 4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS 

 Case 20-33765-KLP Oklahoma City, OK 73118-7901 

 Eastern District of Virginia 

 Richmond 

 Wed Jul 21 10:40:04 EDT 2021 

 Ashley Funding Services, LLC Brock & Scott, PLLC (p)CREDIT ADJUSTMENT BOARD INC 

 Resurgent Capital Services 1315 Westbrook Plaza Dr 8002 DISCOVERY DRIVE 

 PO Box 10587 Winston Salem, NC 27103-1357 SUITE 311 

 Greenville, SC 29603-0587 RICHMOND VA 23229-8601 

 

 Capital One Auto Finance Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Chesterfield Imaging Center 

 Attn: Bankruptcy AIS Portfolio Services, LP PO Box 13343 

 PO Box 30285 4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS Richmond, VA 23225-0343 

 Salt Lake City, UT 84130-0285 Oklahoma City, OK 73118-7901 

 Credit One Bank EMERGENCY COVERAGE CORP Feb Destiny/gf 

 Attn: Bankruptcy Department PO Box 1123 Po Box 4499 

 Po Box 98873 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1123 Beaverton, OR 97076-4499 

 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8873 

 First National Bank First National Bank of PA LVNV Funding, LLC 

 4140 E. State St. Tucker Arensberg PC Resurgent Capital Services 

 Hermitage, PA 16148-3401 1500 One PPG Place PO Box 10587 

 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-5413 Greenville, SC 29603-0587 

 LabCorp Quantum3 Group LLC as agent for Quantum3 Group LLC as agent for 

 PO Box 2240 Cognical Holdings Inc. Genesis FS Card Services Inc 

 Burlington, NC 27216-2240 PO Box 788 PO Box 788 

 Kirkland, WA 98083-0788 Kirkland, WA 98083-0788 

 Scolopax, LLC SunTrust Mortgage US Attorney 

 C/O WEINSTEIN & RILEY, PS PO Box 27767 919 E Main St, Ste 1900 

 2001 WESTERN AVENUE, STE 400 Richmond, VA 23261-7767 Richmond, VA 23219-4622 

 SEATTLE, WA 98121-3132 

 USDOE/GLELSI United Consumers Inc Us Dept Of Ed/glelsi 

 Attn: Bankruptcy Attn: Bankruptcy Dept Attn: Bankruptcy 

 Po Box 7860 Po Box 4466 Po Box 7860 

 Madison, WI 53707-7860 Woodbridge, VA 22194-4466 Madison, WI 53707-7860 

 Zachary Becker James H. Wilson Jr. John P. Fitzgerald, III 

 1616 Birchview Ct. 4860 Cox Road, Suite 200 Office of the US Trustee - Region 4 -R 

 Henrico, VA 23228-1540 Glen Allen, VA 23060-9248 701 E. Broad Street, Ste. 4304 

 Richmond, VA 23219-1849 

 Suzanne E. Wade Ta-Von Becker 

 341 Dial 877-996-8484 Code 2385911 5818 Heather Crossing Drive 

 7202 Glen Forest Drive, Ste. 202 Chesterfield, VA 23832-8493 

 Richmond, VA 23226-3770 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 15
EXHIBIT A 

Eric C. Howlett, VSB No. 82237 

Klementina V. Pavlova, VSB No. 92942 

SANDS ANDERSON PC

P.O. Box 1998 

Richmond, Virginia 23218-1998 

Telephone: (804) 648.1636 

Facsimile: (804) 783-7291 

Email: ehowlett@sandsanderson.com 

 kpavlova@sandsanderson.com 

 Counsel for Zachary Becker 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: TA-VON BECKER, Case No.: 20-33765-KLP 

Chapter 13 

Debtor. 

ZACHARY BECKER, 

Movant, 

v. 

TA-VON BECKER, 

SUZANNE E. WADE, Chapter 13 Trustee, 

and 

LYNN TAVENNER, Chapter 7 Trustee, 

Respondents. 

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

This matter is before the Court on the Amended Motion for Relief from the Automatic 

Stay to modify the automatic stay filed by Zachary Becker ("Mr. Becker"), which seeks relief 

from the automatic stay for the purpose of continuing a state court proceeding seeking 

dissolution of the marriage of Mr. Becker and the Debtor, division of property and debts, and 

determination of support. Upon consideration of the Amended Motion and the arguments of 

counsel at the hearing held on August 4, 2021, and it appearing that there are no objections 

thereto, and for good and sufficient cause shown, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED; 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 15
2 

ORDERED that the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362 is modified to permit 

Mr. Becker to proceed with the Divorce Proceedings and to exercise all permissible rights and 

remedies for dissolution of the marriage, division of property and debts, and determination of 

support, as appropriate; and 

ORDERED that this order shall be effective immediately upon entry and the fourteen 

(14) day stay of Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 4001(a)(3) is hereby waived. 

DATE: 

KEITH L. PHILLIPS 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

Entered on the docket: 

FOR THIS WE ASK: 

 /s/ Klementina V. Pavlova

Eric C. Howlett, VSB No. 82237 

Klementina V. Pavlova, VSB No. 92942 

SANDS ANDERSON PC

P.O. Box 1998 

Richmond, Virginia 23218-1998 

Telephone: (804) 648.1636 

Facsimile: (804) 783-7291 

Email: ehowlett@sandsanderson.com 

 kpavlova@sandsanderson.com 

 Counsel for Zachary Becker 

SEEN AND NOT OBJECTED TO: 

 /s/ Suzanne E. Wade 

Suzanne E. Wade 

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 202 

Richmond, VA 23226 

Telephone: (804) 775-0979 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 15
3 

SEEN AND NOT OBJECTED TO: 

 /s/ Lynn L. Tavenner 

Lynn L. Tavenner 

Tavenner & Beran, PLC 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Telephone: (804) 783-8300 

Facsimile: (804) 783-0178 

 Chapter 7 Trustee for Zachary Becker 

L.B.R. 9022-1(C) CERTIFICATION 

I hereby certify that the foregoing proposed consent order has been endorsed by all 

necessary parties. 

 /s/ Klementina V. Pavlova 

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Order Granting Relief from Stay is identical to the 

form order required by Administrative Order 10-2 and that no modifications, additions, or 

deletions have been made. 

 /s/ Klementina V. Pavlova 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 15
4 

PARTIES TO BE SERVED: 

Ta-Von Becker 

5818 Heather Crossing Drive 

Chesterfield, VA 23832 

 Debtor 

James H. Wilson, Jr. 

4860 Cox Road, Suite 200 

Glen Allen VA 23060 

 Counsel for the Debtor 

Suzanne E. Wade 

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Ste. 202 

Richmond, VA 23226 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

Elizabeth Cabell Brogan 

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 202 

Richmond, VA 23226 

 Counsel for Chapter 13 Trustee 

Lynn T. Tavenner 

Tavenner & Beran, LLP 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

 Chapter 7 Trustee for Zachary Becker 

Klementina V. Pavlova 

SANDS ANDERSON PC 

P.O. Box 1998 

Richmond, VA 23218-1998 

 Counsel for Zachary Becker 

Case 20-33765-KLP Doc 55 Filed 07/21/21 Entered 07/21/21 17:20:18 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 15