### P. 1


# OAR Box 1875 Prepped byOllie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 9 ) ll-E-27 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:44

AM Sheet 9 of 86

### P. 2



# •t ' A-90-1 9 

# RADIA N " * " CORPORATIO N


# y. o£C 

# I 8 \99 2 Septembe r 18 , 199 1 ; c-,/\/ Progres s Center ' 320 0E . ChapelHillRd./Nelso nHwv .

P.O
. Bo x1300 0 ' ResearchTriangl ePark
. N.C
. 2770 9 

# -——-",:""••, - \ " (919)541-910 0 »i< *


# Dr . Jane t S . Meye r U . S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y(MD-13 ) Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Dea r Jan : Thi s i s th e fina l draf t o f thes e meeting notes . You r comment s hav e bee n incorporate d i nfull . Pleas e cal l i f yo u hav e an y question s o r furthe r comments . Sincerely ,
Bennet t King Projec t Directo r BK/l s cc : Bo bRosensteel , EPA/CP B Le s Evans , EPA/CP B Linda Chaput , EPA/SD B Rut hMead , Radia n Trac yGionfriddo , Radia n Projec t Fil e 22. 0 (M . Haley )

### P. 3



# MEETINGNOTE S
FROM : Bennet t King , Radia n TO : Ja n Meyer , EPA/SD B DATE : Septembe r 11 , 199 1 SUBJECT : EPA/CM

AMeeting o f Jul y23 , 199 1 ATTENDEES : Se e Attachmen t 1 Thi s meetin g wa s requeste d b yCM Aan d i s a follow-u

p t o a meetin g hel d o n Jun e 11 , 1991 . An agend a wa s provide d fo r th e meetin g an

d i s include d a s Attachmen t 2 . Th e four subjec t area s o n th e agend a wer e discussed . Th e mai ndiscussio ntopic s ar e summarize d below . Phase-I n o f MAC T Standard s Th e CM Aprovide d a hand-ou t wit hsi xoption s fo r implementing a phase-i n approac hfo r th e HON(Attachmen t 3) . Option s V

an d V I als o addres s issue s tha t ar e independen t o f th e decisio n o n phasing standards . Optio n V deal s wit hth e potentia l fo r permitting t o significantl yincreas e th e tim e require d fo r compliance , an

d Optio n V I present s a propose d streamline d approac hfo r one-yea r extensio n o n complianc e time . Th e CMA' s concern s ar e tha t implementatio n o f th e HONonth e entir e SOCM I a t onc e wil l creat e gridloc k i n a numbe r o f area s (engineering services , vendo r supplies , an d permitting) . Thi s wil l mak e complying wit hth e HONwithi nth e 3 year s allowe d unde r th e CAA Averydifficult .

MCH/01 6

### P. 4



# Summaryo f CMA' s Propose d Option s fo r Phase-I n Optio n 1 - Separat e Rulemaking s o r Applicabilit yDate s - Thi s optio n i s simila r t o th e Equipmen t Leak s phasing onl y complianc e goe s beyond 3 years . Thi s woul d requir e separat e rulemaking s fo r eac hphase . Optio n 2 - Phase-i nMAC T fo r SOCM I b yPhasing Applicabilit y Criteri a wit hRespec t t o Sourc e Characteristic s - Th e CM A fel t on e possibl e interpretatio n o f th e CAA Aallowe d complianc e t o b e measure d fro mth e applicabilit ydate s rathe r tha n promulgation . The yals o fel t ther e wa s n o limi t o n whe n th e standard s coul d begi napplying t o certai n subgroup s o f th e regulate d sources . Thes e subgroup s woul d b e define d wit hrespec t t o sourc e characteristic s suc ha s tank siz e fo r storag e o r flowrat e fo r proces s vents . Optio n 3 - "Source-Wide " Bubbl e Phase-I n - Thi s optio nwoul d requir e a sourc e t o mee t th e tota l emissio nreductio n require d b

yal l th e applicabl e HONstandard s i n a step-wis e fashion . An exampl e o f thi s woul d b e t o requir e tha t 3 3 percen t o f contro l b e applie d withi n 3 years , 6 6 percen t withi n 5 years , an d 10 0 percen t withi n7 years . Thi s optio n woul d leave th e decisio n o f whic hemissio n sourc e typ e t o contro l a t wha t time up t o th e sourc e a s long a s th e requirement s wer e met . Optio n 4 - Phase-I n MAC T fo r SOCM I b yPhasing Applicabilit y o f th e 5 Generi c Standard s tha t wil l Compris e MAC T fo r Productio n Processe s - Th e outcome o f thi s optio ni s th e same a s optio n 3 excep t tha t a sourc e woul d b e tol d whic h emissio n sourc e type s had t o b e controlle d b ywhen . I t wa s th e CMA' s hop e tha t thi s optio ncoul d b e don e wit ha singl e rulemaking package .
MCH/01 6

### P. 5



# Optio n 5 - Tying Permi t Revie wt o MAC T Complianc e - Thi s optio n envision s providing additiona l complianc e time t o mak e up fo r excessiv e permi t revie wtime . Th e proposa l wa s t o allo w3 year s fo r complianc e afte r a permi t wa s obtained . EPAindicate d tha t thi s i s no t a lega l optio n i f i t allow s complianc e time , a s measure d fro mth e promulgate d date , t o g o beyond 3 years . Optio n 6 - Provid e Minimu m Criteri a fo r Accepting Petition s Requestin g One-Yea r Extension s - Thi s i s no t reall ya phasin g optio n bu t i s a wayfo r source s t o ge t mor e time fo r compliance . EPAfel t tha t thi s guidanc e woul d be-provide d a t some poin t during th e rulemaking . Acrucia l issu e wit hphase-i n continue s t o b e th e legalit y o f extending complianc e beyond th e 3-yea r limi t cite d i nth e CAAA . Th e EPAindicate d tha t a standard canno t legall yallo w complianc e tim e beyond 3 years . Th e EPAHONtea m i s working wit h th e Offic e o f Genera l Counse l t o confirm th e EPApositio n o nthi s issue . Asecond issu e i s whethe r o r no t phase-i no f th e HONwil l i n fac t alleviat e th e CMA' s concerns . I t i s unlikel ythi s issu e wil l b e resolve d befor e proposal . I t i s th e EPA' s curren t positio n tha t th e HONshoul d b e propose d withou t phasing an d th e issu e shoul d b e presente d a s par t o f th e preamble . Tes t Method s A t th e previou s meeting , th e EPAexpresse d a desir e t o receiv e tes t dat a comparing th e result s betwee n tw o tes t method s (Method 1 8 an

d Metho d 25) . Abrie f surveyb yCM Afoun d tha t th e tw o method s wer e no t commonl yuse d togethe r s o n o comparativ e dat a wa s available . Th e CM Arequeste d tha t th e HONallo wflexibilit yfo r selecting betwee n th e tw o method s o r validating a ne wmethod . Copie s o f th e validatio n protoco l (Method 301 ) wer e distributed . MCH/01 6 3

### P. 6



# HONApplicabilit y Ho wt o determin e whethe r o r no t a proces s uni t woul d b e subjec t t o th e HONcontinue s t o b e difficul t t o specif yi n regulatorylanguage . Th e EPApresente d a draf t flowchar t (Attachmen t 4 ) o f th e applicabilit ydeterminatio nfo r discussion . Amajo r sourc e o f miscommunicatio n i s a lac k o f agreemen t o n th e meanin g o f suc hterm s a s produce , product , reactant , by-product , co-product , etc . I t wa s suggeste d b yth e CM

Atha t th e HONcoul d b e refine d t o onl yregulat e processe s wher e th e produc t wa s a HAP o r th e mai nreactan t wa s a HAP (botho f thes e term s woul d nee d t o b e defined) . Thi s woul d requir e lessening th e scop e o f th e HONrelativ e t o th e curren t analysi s whic h include s SOCM I processe s producing a n organi c HAP a s a by-product , co-product , o r intermediate . Th e EPArequeste d suggestion s fo r differen t way s t o precisel yan

d clearl yidentif ythos e operation s tha t ar e i n th e scop e o f th e SOCM I an d t o clearl yexclud e activitie s tha t ar e outsid e SOCMI . I t wa s conclude d tha t furthe r wor k an d discussio n o n thi s are a wa s needed . MAC T Issue s CM Arequeste d tha t EPAexplai nho wdraf t regulatoryoption s table s shoul d b e interpreted . Thes e table s ar e include d a s Attachmen t 5 . EPAgav e brie f descriptio no f th e procedure s an d methodologyuse d t o estimat e emissions , emissio n reductions , an d contro l costs . I t wa s emphasize d tha t th e table s shoul d b e treate d a s example s onl yan d tha t theyar e subjec t t o change . Attachment s

MCH/01 6

## 3

O X 

## o »- • 

## ot- , 

## oss«Qt r 

## to^5oc^(L(>ost3B»to>t-'seo o

PlfflH-(D0)O0)P>OH-H-(U3^ l 

## ^H-OI-'P-H-0)( D 1 • < 3 O > ( 0 r t fl) H C O W 

### < 3 01 

# o o a n > fl) 

### 3 

## n > r t 3 " 0 3 01 

### fl) fl> fl> 

### < 3 N H -

## I1 

## a 0 ) X 

### D > 

### O ( 0 

# o c o i r t 

## a> • O 

## c n o 3 

### C D 

## o < o c (f l 

## o 3 " 0 ) > 1 0 . 

## c n H - 0 » 

### 3 

### 9 3 • < O H 0 > 

### 3 

### cf 

# 3 fl> fl) 

### 3 

### ( D ^ < 

### fl) 

## c a d 

## o fl> 0 ) 

### 3 r t O 3 0 ) 3
• 3 0 > 

### i i p > 

### 3 

### r t O O 

## o o ( D 

### O r t rt 3 0 ) r t 

## tr H - 0) 01 

# n > 3 * ( D 3 X O- fl) 0 ) O 3 * 0) t J d r t 

## c o fl> 

### ( D • i 

### 3 O 

## o d r t O 3 * fl) 3 

# cr cr p « 

# ro c n r t 0 ) O * * 3 * O d 

## cn n > • 3 

## o a s : o > (- • r t O 3 W 

### fl) 

### 3 3 fl) r t r t 

# « 3 

### v Q 

### 2 ! 0 > 

### 3 ( D



## w * d 

## > 

# § tf l 

### M • d 

## > *-•«* . O • d 

### 03 

### M • d 

## >

•"-. ^ 

# § O 

## o sr • d 

### t

# 2 < E H - S * 0 1 

### r t 0*Chemica 

## o X 

## *< 

## o 3 * ( D 

### 9 D O 

## « G 3 H - 

## o 3Carbide 

## o 5g 

# P 3 0 * 

## (- • M H - 

### 3ckrodt* 

### M • d 

## > "^s
. 

### 0 1 

## o 0 3 

### O 

# ? 3 fl) 

### 1 

## o * 

## w X X 

## o 3Chemica 

## w • d 

## >

• ^ 

### 0 ) 

## o 0 3 

### M • d 

## > •*-*
. 0 1 

## o 03 t d » d 

## > *"* ^ 0 1 

### D 03 

### M » d 

## > *** v 0 1 

## o 03 

### W • d 

## > "**>. 55 0 1 

## » M • d 

## > ""•N
. 

### 2 ! 0 ) t d 

## w * d 

## > •**«*
. 

### 0 1 

## o 03 

### W • d 

## > » 0 > 

## a H - 

### 0 ) 

### 3 O 1 Q 0 > 

### 3 H -zation 

## >

H HENDEES 

## >

w t- 3



### v o h- » 

### v o O l

* k l- » 1 H » O <J\ 

### t o VO l- » VO U I 

## .& . 1 U I 

## * » M O VO 

## (- » V O O l 

## * . l - » 1 U I U I 

## *> . * k I O O 

### r o

•« j 0 9 U I 

### 1 * > • 0 0 0 0 0 0 

### t o 

### o t o 0 0 0 0

- J 

### 1 l- » h- 0 0 <J\ t-<

- 0 l- » U ) U I 0 0 0 0 O J •ff c 

## * . o\ ~ Jh

### o\ 

### t o 0 0 

### 1 O J H * 

### o O ) U I 

## (- *

- J


### o > O J O N 

### 1 t o V O U I O J 

### t o 

### o O J

^ J VO •f t 

### 1 U I M 0 0 O J 

### t o 

### o t o 0 0 0 0 

### 1 h- » O J l- « O J O J 

## !- • *> . 0 0 

### v o U I 1 

### t o « o VO O J VO M 

### v o U I J > 

### 1 U I 

### t o U I J > ( O 

### o t o 0 0 0 0 

### 1 H 

### •-• 0 0 O J 

### v o 

### o 0 0 O J 

### o t o 1 ^ 4 0 0 t-- U l H

• J H » O J 0 0 

### > 4 O 1 

### o\ M U I 

## »- • v o M 

### v o U I J4. 

### 1 U I 

### t o o\ to VO h- » VO U I 

## *> . t U I O J M O VO M VO U I •t ^ 

### 1 U I 

### o\ to O J 

### v o l- » VO U I 

## *> . l- « 1 U I O J U I 0 0 VO 

### H VO U I 

## *> . 1 O 0 0 ^ 1 O J VO I- 1 

### v o U I •f t H 1 U I U I 

### v o t o VO 

## (- • VO U I 

## *> - l- » 1 U I 

### t o U I 0 0 VO 

## (- • VO U I 

## ^ »- • U I O J t- » M VO M VO U I

* • l- « 1 VO H * O O I- *



### fl> Meph 

## o 3 fl) 

### 55 

### d 3berP.7

### P. 8



# ATTACHMEN

T 2 . Agenda fo r CMA/EP

A Meetin g Genera l Discussio n o nHO N 7/23/9 1 12:3 0 to 5:0 0 p

m 11t hFloo r Conferenc e Roo m 1 . Phase-I n o f MAC T Standard s fo r SOCM I subcategorie s

- Respons e t o an

d discussio n o f previou s suggestion s

- NSR , constructio n etc . permi t consideration s

- Newoption s 2 . Question s o n expecte d Tes t Method s an d Procedure s

- Monitoring provision s

- Concentratio n measurement s fo r applicabilit yan d complianc e determination s 3 . HO NApplicabilit y

- Howt o determin e i f proces s i s subjec t

- Meaning o f term s suc ha s make , produce , product , etc . 4 . MAC T Issue s

- Statu s o f option s developmen t an d decision s o n standard

- Discussio n o f draf t option s an dimpact s O Databas e O Computer model s OInterpretatio

nof table s OPotentia l error s an dbiase s OOther question s

- MACT Floor s OInterpretatio

nof existin

gregulation s OPresent statu s 5 . Wrap-u

p

### P. 9



# ATTACHMENT 3 POSSIBL E ALTERNATIVE S FORHONCOMPLIANC E

(July23 , 1991 ) OPTION1 OPTION2 OPTION3 OPTION4
OPTION5 OPTION6 Separat e Rulemaking s o r Applicabilit yDate s

Phase-I n MAC T fo r SOCM I b yPhasing Applicabilit y Criteri a wit hRespec t t o Sourc e Characteristic s "Source-Wide " Bubbl e Phase-I n Phase-I n MAC T fo r SOCM I b yPhasing Applicabilit y o f th e Fiv e Generi c Standard s tha t wil l Compris e MAC T fo r Productio n Processe s Tying Permi t Revie wt o MAC T Complianc e Provid e Minimu

mCriteri a fo r Accepting Petition s Requesting One-Yea r Extension s

MCH/01 6

### P.1 0 

# ATTACHMEN

T 4



# r

Subjec t t o requiremen t t o

documen t ther e ar e n o HAP' s i n th e process .

### P.1 1



# ATTACHMEN

T 4 . (Continued , 2 Exampl e Illustratio n Proces s uni t "xyz " produce s chemica l Aan d produce s 2 co product s B an

d C i n animpur e streamtha t i s furthe r processe d t o produc e "pure " chemical s B an d C . Produc t Ai s no t a HAP an d th e uni t feedstock s d o no t includ e HAP's . Coproduct s B an

d C ar e HAP's . (1 ) Whic hoperation s ar e SOCM I unit s subjec t t o HON ? B an d C (2 ) A t wha t poin t i n th e uni t A , B , an d C equipmen t train s ar e th e operation s subject ? Wher e creat e B an

d C an d th e HAP concentratio ni s abov e some specifie d minimu mconcentration . I t i s ye t t o b e decide d wha t thes e level s woul d b e

## ATTACHMEN T5 TAH I F 1
. RANGL.QLlMEAQS-EQI i im'LV j VLNj b LX1SJ1N U SOUKCL S EMISSION S 1MPAUS .

Oplio n I I C 5 4 3 2 1 Baselin e JifiisSIUI I (Mu/v i 1 HA P 6.87 4 6.58 4 7.99 3 9.55 4 13.30 4 20.33 2 80.26 2 VO

C 20.81 1 22.93 b 24.9H'. I 30.51 5 44.91 6 79./I / 238.88 0 Incrementa l (missio n

MA P /0 9 1.41 0 1
. 'jb O 3./5 b 7.02 3 59.93 0



### — voi :

2.12* . 2.06 3 ',
. VI
. 14.40 1 J4.U0 1 16'J.lb J In . i i-nu-ii t
. i 1 Vi-n l : . lunLiu l ILX I 1), , ,1. 1 1 1 y ."I' l 1 2

' i l I'. O /'I II I 1.21. / ( I ..I ) liiilliil.i t1 v e (Z )

1(1 0 1, 0 5 '. n 1
. M l / 21 , '.) 1 4 4 Pen.co l IIIIIS- , UXL I tlas . MA C 9 2 / 9 1 t l 'I D 0 bt i 1 11 1 4 / 4 / II.I I 1 mi l i ,, l li. l



### dltllUl l

VO I 9 1 i 'J O 4 i n '
. H / 2 t n 2 1,1 , 1 , 

## COS TIMPACI S

Op l IUI I
II C 5 4 3 2 

### ) Baselin e lotd l

Annua l Cos t (Sl.OOO/yr )
US.00 4 69.69 3 52.44 9 44.16 0 34.28 2 2/.85 0



### — 

## 0
Optio n I I C 5 4 3 2 1 

### Base l m e Energ y

(HHtitu )



### -

_ .

—

- Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t ($1.000/yr ) 15.31 1 15.24 4 8.28 9 9.87 8 6.43 2



### . —
— Averag e



### HA P 1 14 3 94 6 .72 6 b2 S 51 2 46 6



### — Cos t



### lii,imu/ii-i i VO L .19 0 32 J 24 5 21 2 17 / 1/ 5


## rHF R IMPACT

S
N O Emission: . (Mg/yr ) 3.0/ 6 3.01 5 2.22 0 1.86 1 1.84 4 1.79 1 C O (mission s (Mg/y . )
9 3 9 3 54 4 2 4 1 4 0



### . . . A , lui l V , 1, 1 ( o- . ILUliiL-Ll j l!AL ' I M 1 1,
. '.I. I
. Ul.' l 1
. • . . l u I5.U6 5 U M 1. , I',.!!',' , 1 ) 1 '
. t o l').l»6 5 111 ) I D 1.41, 4 III ! 1 u 2'l' l

ll|. l u. n
1 l (


### '
. 4 1



### , ' 1 1 1 1 In tI venes s

1)111 1 'M. i 1

VU L 011 2 t o 6b l .86 9 1)11 2 t o 1 .30 6 (10 2 l o 1.30 6 00 2 t o 1.30 5 00 2 t o 2H 5 00 2 t o 6 4 1 ni l I'll,ni l , i I lip. I

1 1 1 U . 1 1 VL-OLJ i Hl.UUU.Hli l li/U ' VU L . . 2 1 69 6 i o b l I

'
. 11 1 2 t , 1 1 9 It
. 

### -

/ 20' , / 42 5 1 ' , I.m
. 111 6

Al'l' l K.AHI I 11 YCH I I I RI A

1 1 i.Wf
. ) 1 C (selin )
0 4 b / 4 L 4

" J 1 •il ) '
. •I'. O lle.i t

I mi l t- n I IHtu/scf )
0 1 1 1 1 1



### . MAI ' ( miipip
. i 1 i o o

(" I /- I 0 0 

### »."
. U'
. IJ*
. II'
. 

# pOpt io n 

## ATTACHMENT5
. (Continued )

TABLE 2
. REGULATOR YOPTION S FO

R I'KOL l S

S V I NI S NL

WSOURCE S

Op tio n I I C 1 loo r Baselin e (missio n (Hu/vr ) HA P 1.11 6 1.25 0 15.25 0 VO C

3.95 4 4.35 8 45.38 / 

# EMISSIONS IMI'MI S

Incrementa l Emissio n Heii.ir.tio n IMO/V I 1 HA P 13 5 13.99 9 VO C
40 4 41. 02 9 h
O n I I 1 1 1
• 1 / / i i l t,m-li l , i 1 Vill i : . Cun tm l Ici l i v ( IIIIIII I .i t I v e

10 0 l.l ) ' , 

## U ) Percen tImissio n ( i.n l i o l 1 ei l Ove rH.1 S : l 1 li e ('/ 1 MA P 9 2 / 9 1 1 ) VO C

'J I J 'JO 4

Tota l Annua l Cos t ($1.000/yr ) 

# -£0.S.LlMP_ALlt )

Incrementa l Annua l Cos t ($1.000/yr ) Averag e Cos t

Effectivenes s 11 1 001I/H.. I J1A£
_ VO C A i I o i I Viii l (os tI I lei
. I I venes s Kany e lll.WJU/rlu ) MA P VO C Ii nieme uIaIIip
. I MA P ( i l POP/hi) )

I I C Floo r Baselin e

Op tio n

II C Floo r Baselin e 16.15 0 13.24 2 2.90 8 I14 3 0 94 6 0 39 0

0 3 2 1 0 (,
. t n IOb./6 6

O OOi
. l o 3 01 2 0 000 4 t o I0t ) /5 5 0 000 4 l o 24 B 2 1 69 5 / 20 6


# M& Energ y(MHBtu ) 

## R IMPACT S
N O Emission s (Hg/yr ) 68 4 57 3 C O Ii mssio n (My/y i)
11 1 1 / APP I ICABI I N T1 H I I I H I A|
(J o I i o n II C 1 lou i Base l I li e 1 lowral e

0 4.6 2 0 Me.i t

I oi l le i i t 

### -llUl^iLl l

0 1 0 MA

P ( onion s 1 1 1 o o 1



## _ . (» i ti. -

1 0 0 0

## ATTACHMEN T 5 . (Continued ) TABL E 3 . REGULAIOR YOPTION S IORPKO US S VINI S i XISiIN GSOURCL S EMISSION S IMPACI S

Optio n II C 1 loo r Baselin e Emissio n (Hu/vr ) HAP 5.87 4 6.58 4 80.26 2 VO

C 20.81 1 22.93 6 236.86 0 Incrementa l Emissio n Hl'dUCllO. " 'HU/V I 1 HA P 70 9 73.6/ 8 VO C 2.12 6 2I6.-J4 4 1 in . i pint-n t.1 1 Vent: . Coll i I o l le d I),,.m l 1 1 y 24 9 111, ' Ciiiiiiila l 1 v e 1%)

10 0 1,0 6 Percen tlinissio n ((m l i o l le d Ove l Baselin e IX ) MA P 9 ? / 9 1 B VII I

9 1 3 9 0 4



## COSTIMPACI S
Op tio n

I I C (loo r Base)in e lota l

Annua l Cos t ($l000/yr )

85.00 4 69.69 3 Incrementa l

Annu a 1 Co s t ($1000/yr )

15.31 1 Averag e Cos t

f1feetivenes s (flDOO/Mu l MA P 1 14 3 .94 6 VO

C 39 0 32 3 A . 1.1, 1 V . Il l l.p. l I I l. i 1 1 v , in-;,' . Haillj e (Hll00/M.| )
MA P 01 1 I n 61, 1 .111, 9 0 1 1 l o 15.115 5 VI M 00 2 t o 561.86 9 00 2 t o 1.30 5 1 III . 1 Cllll'll t. 1 1 (IP . 1 1 I te d ivenes s (HU00/M.| ) MA P 2 1 59 6 VII I / 20 6 

# o 

# 2 

# 3

Op tio n


### I I C I loo r Baselin e 

# J_It tE R IMPACT S Energ y(HHBtu ) HO , Emission s (Hg/yr ) 3.0/ 6 3.01 6 C O (missio n (Hg/y i )
9 5 9 1 Op tio n
II C 1 I.... I Base l i m APP I 1CABI I 1 1 TCHIIIHI A

1luwrat e (sclm )
0 4 b 2 ] Hea t

( o n I e n I 

## _ifil"i5kl l

0 1 MA

P 1 OIIIDOS I 1 lol l 

## -_..I_l._l._
. .

0 0



## -.. . ___ .Op t io n
6 4 3 2 1 J-- 1 lfl


## ATTACHMENT5
. (Continued )



# TABI E 4 . RANGE OF IMPACT S FOR1RANSLLKUI'LKAIIUN - _-L_l.U___.QUR_l.- _ __M_1____UML > 

## AL1
_ Emission s (Hg/yr ) 

## HA P 372.0 3 40 6 8 3 43 0 6 8 473.9 2 495.2 3
• H.1 3 VO

C 3/ 2 0 3 40 6 6 3 43 0 6 6 47 3 9 2 495.2 3 

### -H.1 9 Inc i einenta l (missio n

Heiloctio n (Hg/y i ) HAP 

### 348 0 2 3 8 5 4 3 2 4 2 1 3 0 1 69 6 

### VO

C 3 4 B 0

• 2i11 6 4 3 2 4 2 1 3 0 1 8 9 6 In
. i
. in.'i. I
. i I H. H 1 : I i,n l i o l le d l) „ ,1, 1 i I v 

### I I
. 

## / I IIIIIIII.I I Iv e (/
. |

/ 4 4 I , 1 1 I 2 0 4 Pe l i.cu tI m i -..-. I o o

Contro l le d live r MA P 27.6 6 •20 B b l b 2 4 7 8 3 3 6 9 2 /

1,6 2 0 til l I I , 2 4 / ' b l 3 1,9

Op tio n 

## XQSIJMPA.l lota l Annua l Cos t (J1.000/yr ) Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (Jl.OOO/yr ) Averag e Cos t

I tli-i- l i venes s (t l 111HI/H.. I JJ__
_ YQ 1 . 1 n., 1 (o. i ...J_I_J__L
_ 1 1 i i IIAI ' VU L I lit
. l eillen l
. i I tIP. 1 ._J__1_.I-LIU... H _Lii_U_U/_u l IIAI'
. VU L 5 4 3 2 1 

## Baselin e 5.84 4

3.83 6 2.76 6 1.22 1 42 0 JW../Q . 2.00 8

1.07 0 1.54 5 80 1 42 0 4 1 1 0 35.7 2 33.1 2 30.3 2 22.1 5 4 1 1 0

36/ 2 3 3 1 2 3 0 3 2 Tl 1 6 1 9 l o 1,6 2

1 9 l o bl 1 9 l o 4 b 1 9 t o 4 b 1 9 t o 2 b 1 9 to 66 2 1 9 lo b l 1 9 l o 4 b 1 9 to 4 8 1 9 to 2 6 6 / / 0 4 4 B 4 3 6 / 2 3 / 6 B 2 2 1 6 5 / / 0

4 4 B 4 3 6 / 2 3 / 6 8 l i 1 5

Optio n 5 4 3 2 1 

## Baselin e 

## i l l

Energ y(MMBtu ) 

### 1.27 9 1.03 9 

### 84 3 56 5 8 8 

## HE R IMPACTS NO
. Emission s (Hg/yr )

0 54 2 0.44 1 0 39 8 0 29 3 0 04 5 C

O (mission s (M.|/y i )

( I01)1. 4 ( IUtl111 0o ni n 0O UI1 0000 B APP I ICABI I I I Y(KIIIHI A Op tIo n

4 3 2 I I I'" " Vapo rPie s sin e

Inif l It'l l 1 2 1 6 1 6 1 5 l b Ac to. i I I I n ooqhpu t

lrlrl_j|Z_r J 6 B b 1 9 / 1 9 5 J O



## S iOptio n 

## .ATTACHMEN T5 . (Continued ) TABI E 5 . REGULATOR YQPT_j_tJ_ L 

## ±Dli_

J t__M_ l L U U_LI__llQN_,__i______l_IL L

Emission s iHo/vr l 

### HA P VO

C 

## EMISSION S 1MPACI S

Incrementa l Emissio n 

### Rrrtluctin u iMu/y i ) HA P VO

C I h i i eiiien ta l Hack s LullLlll l IUl l Ijn.ili l I ty Coiiiiila l I v e (% ) Percen t luiissio nControlle d Ove r Baselin e (t l 

### HA P VO

C II C I loo r B JAIIII 3 0 4 5 41.5 8 3 0 4 5

4 1 5 8 

## 3/./ Q I I 1 3

6 6 1 2 lil t 51 , 1 2 1 9 10 0 1, 1 6 B B 3

5 / 4 4 bt l B 3 6 / 4 4

Optio n

TI C
> loo r 

## .Baseline 

## COS T.MEALI S Tota l Annua l Cos t ( 11000/yr )
6.89 1 4.31 1 Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (SlOOO/yr )
2.58 0 4.31 1 Averag e Cos t

Effectivenes s (11000/Hu ) JJAE
_ 10 2 4 8 / 6 8 3 _¥__
_

102.4 8 / 6 8 3 Ai l n.1 1 K.n. k Cos tI I le i I ivenes s K-iiut : 1-lUUQ/Mu J l__ . . . 4I n264. I b 5 4l ob/. I1 0 

### __Ul
_ 4 t o 264.1B 6 4 l o b/,13 0 IIIIILlll l11 1 . 1 ICllS t

L Mee tI venes s (IIOOO/Hu ) ._/_.'
_ 23 1 / B 10 3 b b 

### ML.

21 1 / B 10 3 bB 

# o 

# 3
Op tio n

II C Floo r Baselin e 

# j m

Energ y(MHBtu )

1.51 7 9 0 6 

## R IMPACT

S NO . Emission s (Mg/yr )
0 24 5 0 15 5 C

O (mission' . (Mg/yi )
0 006 4 0 002 B Oplin n II C tloo r 

## ._!__ ; lm_ . APP l ICABI I I I Y(RllfRI A

Vapo r Pressur e

- 1"»1 H«ll _ 0 2 5 Ai t o a I

ll nnpn t lHHQa|/ Y .|' ) N/ A N/ A Ma n IIIIIIM I

Thrupu t 

## •l-i-i-li-Ll
.

0 0.1 0

T l

# ATTACHMEN T 5 . (Continued ) TABI E 6 . REGUIATORYOPTION S FORTRANSLLILUIIKA I lQNS___L_lHili(L-SQUJ_-LS Optio n 

## EMISSION S IMPACTS
Emission s (Ho/vr l HAP VO

C Incrementa l Emissio n

Rnilu.tiu u (Hu/yrl — HAP VO C I ni
. i ementa l Hack s

, Lu uLi u1 1 I),..m l l I y ( omu l a t Iv e [%) Percen t linissio n(on t m l le d ->- l _d-t; l Hit : 11 1 

### MA P Vill II C F loo r 

# Baselin e 16 0 2 6 21 8 8 5



# - M l _ 16 0 2 6

21 8 8 5 

## 5M.1
- 6 8 5 9

21 8 8 5 5 B 5 9 21 8 8 5 26t

t 10 b iUi

10 0 6 3 b 6 8 3

5 / 4 4 b B B l 6 / 4 4 

## J_Q_J_1_|_ACI S
Optio n Total

Annua l Cos t (SlOOO/yr ) Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (SlOOO/yr ) Averag e Cos t



## -ffealMenes ? lllQuli/rlu l __AE
_ 

## ____

_ Actua l Hac k Cos tI I te d i venes s Hanu e muOO/Hu ) .MI L 

## JU_

_ lncitnitiil.i l ('os t

E I III1 1 venes s lll()QQ/Hu l JJA H 

### „.VUt . TI C Floo r 

## Baselin e 36.27 0 22.69 0 13.58 0

22.69 0 10 2 4 8

7 6 8 3 102.4 8

/b.8 3 1 9 t o 1.337.81 3

1 9 l u 363.31 9 19 t u1.337.81 3 1 9 l o 353.31 9 23 1 / 8 10 3 t a 23 1 / B 10 1 b B

Optio n

TI C Floo r 

## B-selin e 

# m

Energ y(HHBtu )

7.98 4 4.76 6 

## •» IMPArT S

NO . Emission s (Mg/yr )
I 28 8 0 81 7 C

O Emission s (Hg/y i )
0 0211 6 0 014 9 APPI1CAB K11 YCRITERI A

Ql'tll" ! II C I loo r 

### ._ai_lill_
_ Vapo r

Pressur e Iffi n Hql_
_ 0 2 5 Ha m mu m

Thrupu t 

## IfflM/yx J

0 0 3 0

T l

## ATTAHMEN T5 . (Continued ) I ABI E J. DISIRIBUIK M OfIMPACI S i l NOOE l IAN KSU E EO N HAIOGEHAIE D AN

O SKCIAll l CH1MICAI S I N LXIS I IM G I ANUS •••••••(•tltE f IIS«tII>U«ll*l>l>»*** k > l ,IE>lca>a * ( I - : i " ::t : - £ 1 .;ca«£ :


### Optio n lan

k Sit t (0*1 ) lota l Averag e

Tota l HAP/VOCPercen t Percent tota l Cos t Vapor HAP/VOCEaisaionContro l Ove r Neate r Contro l Over Annua l Effectivenes s Preeaur e Eaiaaiona ReductionBaselin e o f Tank s Baseline Cos t to r HAP S (pala ) (Mg/yr ) (Mg/yr ) (Eaiaaiona ) Controlled(Tanks ) (Jul y '0 9 t/yi ) (Jul y

'8 9 t/HgHAP ) Optio n2 10,00 0 2 5 1J7.5 2 58.6 8

20.00 0 1. 5 38.0 8 258.5 1 40.00 0 0. 5 55.9 5 419.5 2 200.00 0 0. 2 95.7 * 255.4 9 1.000.00 0 0. 1 259.5 4 1337.3 4 2,000.00 0 0. 1 247.4 4 J15.5 J Optio n2 Total s 054.0 1 2045.2 7 29.9 U 87.0 U 91.72 X 72.15 1 03.75 1 55.45 1 77.02 X 1 9

11 7 21 1 21 0 252 1 U 955 7./2 X

66.10 X 86.59 X 78.95 X 9).)1 X IOO.OOX 70.7VX 950.80 0

6.168.60 9 11,167.86 2 7,504.16 7 7.094 . H O J.575.24 5 16.669,09 } 16.M 0 2},86 2 18.14 9 29,14 9 5,10 5 10.65 5 12.TV S



### IA81 E 0 . OISIBIBUIION O f IMPACT S 8 « NQ0C LTAN KSIZ E TO

RHONHAUK-EHAIE 0 AH

ONONSPECIAII YCHEMICAL S I HEXISIIN

GIANKS

Optio n Tan k

Sil t (gai ) 10.00 0 20.00 0 40.00 0 200.00 0 1.000.00 0 2,000,00 0 Vapo r

Preaaur e (paia ) 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 Tota l

HAP/VO C Eaiaaion a <*o/yr ) 11.9 1 42.4 5 100.5 4 215.4 0 194.8 6 292.8 0 Tota l

HAP/VO C Caiaaio n •eductio n (NB/y D 149.1 4 124.7 1 551.5 9 1507.J O 2057.5 5 2574.5 2 Percen t

Contro l Ova r •aaalin e (Eaiaaiona )

92.19 X 74.6 U 8J.56 X 87.50 1 91.35 X 89.79 X Ktafee r

o fTank s Controlle d

9 8 11 4 482 91 0 55 8 4) 9 Percen t Contro l Ove r Baselin e (Tanks ) 60.87 1 61.J1 X 9J.41 X 100.OO X 100.00 X 100.OO X lota l Annua l Cos t (Jul y'8 9 S/yr ) 1.495.14 8 25.41 7 108.75 0 1.125.77 8 2.020.82 4 2.961,87 4 

### Averag e

Cos t Effectivenes s fo r HAP S Optio n2

Optio n2 Total s 847.9 8 4984.7 9 88.95 X 260 1 94.10 X 9.955,79 1 20.66 4 20 4 56 0 74 6 98 2 1.15 0 1.42 2

T J

## ATTACHMEN T 5 . (Continued ) TA^ F ft. RFGUIATOR YOPTION S FO RSTORAG E O F IIAIOGENATF O COMPOUND S - NF W SOURCES , .IMISS1QMS-I M
Optio n
2 1 Floo r Baselin e (mission s (Mo/vr >



# ML 16 2 16 2 17 4 

## JUL . ____

_ 16 2 16 2 

### 1/4 

## JU L Incrementa l Emissio n

•.eductio n (Mo/vr l 

### _UA£
_ 0 1 1 b3 3 VO

C 0 I I 63 3 

# 'fi t

# I S Incrementa ltank s -.Ullll-llt- l _UuJlltll_
_ 0 I l/l l

### Z'A

## CuinuldUs_-iX L / l / I / 0 Percen t Imissio nControlle d

Ove r Baselin e (I l 

## JIAI L / / / / lb 

## J.0 L

/ / / / /b 

## COSTIMPACT S
Optio n
2 1 Floo r 

## Baseline Tota l

Annua l Cos t (J1.000/yr ) 6.97 0 6.9/ 0 6.78 0 Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (Sl.OOO/yr )

0 18 2 6.78 0 Averag e Cos t Effectivenes s



## UiUaJ itfl p 12.60 0 12.60 0 12.70 0 

### -VOL .

12.H0 0 12.80 0 12. /0 0 Averag e Cus ttf(ee l ivenes s Rang e ( i l OQQ/Hyi l IIAI . _ _ ! > J t u 2 9 3 

### S 3 t o 2 9 3 0t o 2 9 3 _W_
_ 

### b 3 t o 29. 3 b. 3 t o 29. 3 0t o 29. 3 incrementa l tos t JJ_j_a_ltf_J____J__u J IIA P 0 lb.30 0 12./0 0

Optio n 2 I Floo r 

### lin e Basel i Enero v(HWh )

5.50 0 5.50 0 5.29 0 

## OTHE RIMPACT S

NOEmission s (Mo/vr l 

## CO tmisaj_ui_.J_!i-_c_- .

" Thes e represen t th e rang e o f average cos t effectivenes s fo r eac htan ksure , no t a tru e rang e o ( minimu man d maximu mvalue s 

## . VUL_ _ o lb. 30 0 12./0 0 

# O 

# 3

T J C O

## ATTACHMENT5
. (Continued ) TARI F 10
. RFGUIATOR YOPXLQMS-JXlfi-SJQRAG E Q I HONIIALUGLNAlLU-LUMlfl L _ML M JflUBLL S
_ JMISSIQMS-JMQACI S

Op t io n (mission s (Ma/vr l



# HA P

___ _ Incrementd ) Emissio n Reductio n(Ha/v i ) ' -UAi L __UL _ I in . i iimn ta I lank- . 

## Lmilrulk.
. UujnllL y -.L_iw_la.lv. ; ill
. Percen t (missiu n tout ni l I

t Ui-txJ___l4ii___l J .UM . 

### yui.
. 3 2 I Floo r 

## Baselin e 16 5 18 9 90 4 90 4 

## l.«9 0 16 b 16 9 90 4 90 4 

## 1.19 0 2 4

/l b 0 bB 8 2 4

/l b 0 bbt t '.I I

I n /

21 9 9 4 H. I 4 / 4 / u g 8 / 3 9 3 9 tri

ui 3 9 3 9

Op t io n
3 2 1 Floo r 

## Baselin e Tota l

Annua l Cos t (Sl.OOO/yr )
1.21 0 8b 2 14 2 14 2 Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t ($1.000/yr )
36 2 99 4 0 -14 2 

## COS TIMPACTS Averag e Cos tEffectivenes s



## UZMfl J 

# _u_e _ 91 5 6b 3 24 1 24 1 __Q£

_ 91 b bb 3 -24 1 -24 1 Ave l .IIj t Cos ! I I le d i venes s Hang e



## UOMZlk J IIAI L 0 U i t o 2 0 / I ) I . i n 1 4 b I 4 t o 1 4 b I 4 t u 1 4 b 

## _UL _

• 0 0 3 tu 2 0 / 0 bl o 1

4 b I 4 t o 1 4 6 I 4 t o 1 4 6 Incrementa l fus t LlleLtivenes s (1/Mu l 

## -MI L lb.30 0 I . 39 0 0 24 1



## Oa t io n 3 2 i Floo r 

## Baselin e Energ y (HWh } 

## QTHFR IMPACTS

HO
. [mission s iHq/yr L C O [mis s line , (Hn/y i I

'These represen

t th e rang e of average cos t effectivenes s fo r eac htan ksi/e . nu

t a lin

e rang e o l minimu man d ma.imuii i value s _V0t . lb.30 0 I , 19 0 0 24 1 

# o 

# 3

T 3

r o

# TABL E 1 1 ATTACHMEN T 5 . (Continued ) REGULATORYOPTION S FORSTORAG E O F IIAIOGlNAIll ) COMPOUND S EXISTIN GSOUHCL S 

# I

Optio n

2 1 (loo r2 Floo r1 

### Baselin e Emission s (Hg/yr ) HAP 8S 5 85 5 1.08 0 1.08 0 

## ../.. VO C Bb b 8b b 1.08 0 1.08 0 

# ..n.

Optio n
2 1 Floo r2 Floo r1 

### Base l int
. lota )

Annua l Cos t ($1.000/yr )
36.70 0 36.70 0 30.10 0 30.10 0 Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (Sl.OOO/yr )

0 6.57 0 0 30.10 0 

## FMISSION S IMPAtI S . . Incrementa l (missio n Reductio n (Hg/yi ) MA P 0 

## in 0 2.64 0 VO C (1 2. Y 1 1 2.t>4( ) I m i eiiien ta 1 lank'
. 1 ou ti u l lt d IJu.ln l 1 1 y 0 l.'- l I ) Mi l 

### .-.l.J-t t
... . - I i i i i n 1 1 .i l i v e (X ) / I / I 

## !"" 1. 2 Peii.cn t(i n I , - . 1 1 > i i Controlle d Ove rbaselin e



## m MAI ' 

## / / / / / I / I vui :



## n u / i 

## n COSTIMPACT S Averag e Cos tEffectivenes s

( 1 Ha l HAP 12.80 0 12.80 0 11.40 0 11.40 0 

## OTHE R IMPACTS Optio n 2 1 Floo r2 floo r1 Baselin e 

### fnerq v(HWh ) 29.00 0 29.00 0 19.70 0 19.70 0 HO . Emission s (Ma/v r 0 0 0 0 

## VO

C 12.80 0 12.80 0 11.40 0 11.40 0 Avt i .i
. J I •lie. l 1 1 Ii i 1 i vine.,.
. Kany e (1 1 OOO/M-l l



### . . ILII : b 1 I n 2 9 i b i l o 2 9 J I ) I n 2 9 3 U I n 2 9 3



## l C

O [mission-
. |M.|/ Y ! 1

0 0 0 0 VU L b 3 l u 2 9 3 b 3 t u 2 9 3 o ' l o 2 9 3 0 l u 2 9 3 1 i n l cinenl. i 1 1 u', t 1 I I L I I iv e ies. , fi/Mu l llul ' 0 '29./0 0 0 II.40 0 VUL
. . . 0 29./0 0 0 II,40 0 

# o 

# 3

"Ihes e represen t th e rang e o f averag e cos t eflec t ivenes s fo r eac htanksi/e . n ma iiu e i any e o l mm i d 

### n dinaAimu mvalue: .

T 3 

### h o

## ATTACHMEN T5
. (Continued ) TABI F1?
. RFGUIATOR YOPTION S FO R STORAG E O F NONIIA l UGLNAIII ) COMPOUNDS - I XlSilM_____KLL S I EMISSION S IM'ACI S

1 Optio n

2 1 Floo r3 Floo r2 Floo r1 

## Baselin e Emissio n (Mo/vr l HA P

. 87 0 89 0 4.76 0 4.86 0 6.76 0 7.85 0 VO C 87 0 89 0 4.76 0 4.86 0 6.76 0 

## 7.85 0 Incrementa l Emissio n

Reductio n (Mo/vr l HAP 2 2 3.8/ 0 10 6 1.89 0 1.10 0 VO C 22 3.8/ 0 10 6 1.89 0 1.10 0 In
. i iiiienl a 1 lank: , Lou tm l le d ._UUJIIIII I „ 9 ) 1
. 19 / I . / 41 2 1 1 1 2 2./ M Lumul-iLiy t.1X1
. 9 4 9 1 4 / 4 b 1 0 Percen t(missio n Controlle d Ove rBase l n e (X
.



## COSTIMPACT S
Opt io n 2 

# D1 Floo r3 Floo r2 Floo r1 

## Baselin e Tota l

Annua l Cos t ($t.000/yr )
9.94 0 8.38 0 -7 5 2.08 0 -12 1 Incrementa l

Annua l Cos t (Sl.OOO/yr )
1.55 0 8.46 0 2.01 0 -1.96 0 12 1 Averag e Cos tEffectivenes s ( I Mn . HAP 1.42 0 1.20 0 2 4 -69 6 11 1 VO

C 1.42 0 1.20 0 2 4 -69 6 11 1 AVI I i.|
. lu:. t1 1 li
. 1 l vei n •.' , kang c < i | ,000/Mii l MAI " 0 2 l u 2 0 / U 2 l u 1 4 t i 1 2 t u 1 4 t , 1 2 l o t i 0 0 b t u 0 b 

## OTHE R IMPACT S Ootio n 2 l Floo r3 Floo r2 Floo r1 

## Baselin e fnerg ylHWh l 0 0 0 0 0 HO . Emission s (Mo/vr l 0 0 0 0 0 C Q lm\-.-.M\4

(Mj/yi: )
. I I U u n 0 VO C 0 2 t o 2 0 / 0 2 t o 1 4 t

> 1 2 l o 1 4 6 1 2 l u b 0 0 b t o 0 b 

## MA

P 8 9 tt'J 3 9 3 b 1 4 VU L

8 9 8 9 3 9 3 b 1 4

Inciementa l I'us l 1 Ifi- i 1 iwe i es s lt/M,i l HA P 10. 100 2
. 19 0 18.90 0 1.04 0 11 1 VO

C /0.I0 0 2.19 0 lb.90 0 1.04 0 I I I 

# 5 3

These represen tth e rang e o faverag e cos teffectivenes s fo reac h tan k si/e
. nu ta tru e fang e u l iniminim i an d nia»imu m value
.

# TABL E 13 . AIIALHMLN I b . (Continued ) ILLUSTRATION

O F REGULATORYOPTION S I O UWASUWAII ULX1S1IN GSOURCL S 1 FMISSION S IMI.ALI S . . .. __ _
Op tio n 6 TI C b 4 3 2 1 Floo r--

Baselin e F'-tlS&IQn. S (Mu/vr l HAP 15.62 9 15.94 8 18.23 7 18.72 5 28.92 2 39.12 0 

# l,.i.l VO

C 49.70 0 50.71 5 57.99 4 59.54 6 91.97 2 124.40 2 

# m,.K Incrementa l Emissio n

Heiluc tin n (Mu/v i 1 MA P 31 9 2.28 9 48 8 10.19 7 10.19 8 35.73 7



## -- VO

C 1.01 b /.2/ J 1
. bb 2 32.42 6 32.43 0 113.64 3 IIII. I euienta l blreain_
. Cun tni l le d (Ju.ni l 1 1 y 94 2 .\'l 10 b 14 0 19 2 14 0 Ciiimil.i l I v e (X ) b 4 1 3 b 

### a I I b Percen t(missio n Cuntrolle d

Ove rbaselin e (I l



## COSTIMPACT S
Op tio n 

## j6 TIC 

# 1 S 

# 1 4 1 3

2 1 

## Floo r-- Baselin e Tota l

Annua l Cos t ($>000/yr )
267.90 0 182.60 0 122.10 0 116.60 0 74.20 0 21.50 0



## - - Incrementa l Annua l Cos t (SlOOO/yr )
85.30 0 60.50 0 5.50 0 42.40 0 52.70 0 21.50 0



## -- Averag e Cos t

Effectivenes s (11000/Hu ) HA P 4 52 3 3.10 0 2 15 7 2 07 7 1 61 5 0.60 2



## - - VO

C 1 .42 2 0.9/ b 0 6/ b 0 6b 3 0 50 8 0.18 9



## -- A
. lu.i l 1 a i i 1 1 1 yfij-. t1 1 (ec tivenes s



### Hum ilipou/Mu l MAI * I ) 20//.000
. 00 0 0 20/1.41. 0 0 19/1.03 0 0 19/1.03 0 0 19/1.00 0 0 19/2 6 VO C 0 06/2.200.00 0 0 0b/4b 9 0 06/32 4 0 06/32 4 0 00/32 4 0.06/ 8



## - - WP

/ 9 / 9 / 6 7 5 b l 4 8



## - - VO

C / 9 / 9 / 6 / b 6 1 4 b

Incrementa l Cos t L I lc'LtlvLiiei, % lilOQO/Mu ) HAP 2 b / 0 2 b 4 1 1 2 4 1 b 1 0 6 0 VO C b 4 0
« 3 3 b 1 3 1 b 0 1 9


## ! Optio n

6 II C 5 4 3 2 1 Floo r- Baselin e 

## O T Energ y(HNBtu )
4 8 9 xIO 7 2.2 5 xI0 7 1.6 2 x10 7 1.3 2 x10 7 0.9 3 x10 7 0 3 9 x10 7 

## I f R IMPACT S

NO xEmission s (Hg/yr )

5.59 1 2.57 2 1.84 5 1.51 0 1.06 2 44 7 C

O Emission s (Mij/y i )



## /•)' , I I I 241 , 20 1 142 L 0 Op tio n b b 4 3 2 1

. 1 llti- l
. APPI.ICABIUI
.

Flowrat e 

## (lun ) II C l i i 5 1 0 CHIIERI A

VHA P Concen tra tio n (uoniM ) II C 10 0 20 0 bO O 60 0 1.00 0



### r o c o