17446 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 23, 2011. 

James R. Holbein, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7295 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; Notice of 

Alleged Safety or Health Hazards 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL) hereby announces the submission 

of the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA) sponsored 

information collection request (ICR) 

titled, ‘‘Notice of Alleged Safety or 

Health Hazards,’’ to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval for continued use 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35). 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

April 28, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR, with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov 

Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, on the day 

following publication of this notice or 

by contacting Michel Smyth by 

telephone at 202–693–4129 (this is not 

a toll-free number) or sending an e-mail 

to DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk 

Officer for the Department of Labor, 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Office of 

Management and Budget, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 

202–395–4816/Fax: 202–395–6881 

(these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 

202–693–4129 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or by e-mail at 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Respondents use the Notice of Alleged 

Safety or Health Hazards, Form OSHA– 

7, to report unhealthful and/or unsafe 

conditions in the workplace to the 

OSHA. OSHAct section 8(f)(1) 

authorizes employee reports. The OSHA 

uses this information to evaluate the 

alleged hazards and to schedule an 

inspection. 

This information collection is subject 

to the PRA. A Federal agency generally 

cannot conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information, and the public is 

generally not required to respond to an 

information collection, unless it is 

currently approved by the OMB under 

the PRA and displays a currently valid 

OMB Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information if the 

collection of information does not 

display a currently valid OMB control 

number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 

1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval 

for this information collection under 

OMB Control Number 1218–0064. The 

current OMB approval is scheduled to 

expire on March 31, 2011; however, it 

should be noted that information 

collections submitted to the OMB 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. For 

additional information, see the related 

notice published in the Federal Register 

on January 13, 2011 (76 FR 2417). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. In 

order to help ensure appropriate 

consideration, comments should 

reference OMB Control Number 1218– 

0064. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration (OSHA). 

Title of Collection: Notice of Alleged 

Safety or Health Hazards, Form OSHA– 

7. 

OMB Control Number: 1218–0064. 

Affected Public: Individuals and 

Households. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 50,715. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 50,715. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 13,414. 

Total Estimated Annual Costs Burden: 

$1,116. 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7362 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–75,090] 

Wausau Daily Herald Advertising 

Production Division, a Subsidiary of 

Gannett Co., Inc.; Wausau, WI; Notice 

of Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

By application dated March 1, 2011 

(received March 7, 2011), the petitioner 

requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of Wausau Daily 

Herald, Advertising Production 

Division, a subsidiary of Gannett Co., 

Inc., Wausau, Wisconsin (subject firm). 

The determination was issued on 

February 11, 2011. The Department’s 

Notice of Determination will soon be 

published in the Federal Register. The 

workers produce newspaper 

advertisements. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that, during the period 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 17447 

under investigation, there were no 

increased imports or an acquisition of 

services from a foreign country by the 

workers’ firm. The negative 

determination stated that the worker 

separations are due to a shift of services 

to other locations within the United 

States and the firm did not produce an 

article or supply a service that was used 

by a firm with TAA-certified workers in 

the production of an article or supply of 

a service that was the basis for TAAcertification. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner alleged that ‘‘Gannett is 

outsourcing ads in order to reduce the 

workforce throughout Gannett 

Newspapers.’’ The request also focused 

on a Gannettoid newsletter, dated 

August 20, 2009, that stated 

‘‘Outsourcing will increase from 10% to 

about 30% being outsourced’’ and a 

newsletter, dated November 23, 2009, 

that stated ‘‘we have reinstated 

outsourcing * * * outsourcing will be 

setting up visits to those sites who have 

already accomplished some local area 

consolidations such as * * * 

Wisconsin.’’ The request also referred to 

other, previously-submitted articles that 

mention out-sourcing by the subject 

firm. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the petitioning workers 

meet the eligibility requirements of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

March, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7266 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,897] 

Penske Logistics LLC a Subsidiary of 

General Electric/Penske Corporation 

Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Kelly Temporary Services and 

Manpower; El Paso, TX; Notice of 

Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

By application dated February 18, 

2011, the petitioners requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

negative determination regarding 

workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Penske Logistics LLC, a 

subsidiary of General Electric/Penske 

Corporation, El Paso, Texas (subject 

firm). The determination was issued on 

January 7, 2011. The Department’s 

Notice of Determination was published 

in the Federal Register on January 26, 

2011 (76 FR 4729). The subject firm 

supplies warehousing services which 

includes storage, processing, and 

shipping services for the automotive 

industry. 

The negative determination was based 

on the findings that, during the period 

under investigation, subject firm sales 

and/or production did not decline 

during the relevant period and the 

subject firm did not shift to another 

country the supply of storage, 

processing and shipping services (or 

like or directly competitive services). 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners alleged that ‘‘All departments 

have been impacted in the outsourcing 

of our work requirements into Mexico 

Delphi Plant locations’’ and identified 

specific functions that have allegedly 

shifted abroad ‘‘since 2009 (maybe 

2008)’’ due to ‘‘X-dock implementation 

needs into Mexico’’ and specific 

locations in Mexico to where the 

services allegedly shifted—‘‘Mochis 

Sinaloa, Meoqui Chihuahua, Juarez 

Chih, and * * * Chihuahua Chihuahua 

who is currently on hold due to plant 

transitioning into Durango.’’ 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the workers’ request for 

reconsideration and the existing record, 

and has determined that the Department 

will conduct further investigation to 

determine if the petitioning workers 

meet the eligibility requirements of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

March, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7268 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 8, 2011. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than April 8, 2011. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, Employment and Training 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES