TEST REPOR T for General Shale II•oncure,

NC

Brick

General Shale Brick 1600 Colon Road Sanford, NC 27330 (919) 774-5306TECH Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC P. O. Box 12353 Research Triangle

Park, NC 27709-2353 (919) 544-6338 March 13, 2006Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-O391-GenSh) March 13, 2006 Pa eii Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC Report Certification This report has been reviewed

by the following

Air-Tech

Environmental,

LLC personnel

and is a true representation

of the results obtained

for the sampling

program

at the General

Shale Brick facility in Moncure,

NC. The sampling

and analytical

methods

were performed

in accordance applicable EPA reference

methods

except where noted in this report.
Approvals:

Team Leader: Darrell H. Doerle, Senior Staff Scientist Date Reviewer: Michael W. Hartman,

Principal

ScientistAir- Tech Environmental,

LL C General Shale Test Report (AT05-O391-GenSh) TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
2.0

3.04.0 Page INTRODUCTION ...................................................... Executive Summary

............................................ 1 General Shale Results

Summary

Line 4 1

............................. RESULTS SUMMARY

.................................................. 3 2.1 HF and HCI Sampling

Results 2.2 Particulate

Matter Sampling

Results SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL

METHODS QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Figure 1. Figure 2. Tables HF Results

Summary

............................................. 3 HCI Results

Summary

............................................ 4 PM Results

Summary

............................................ 4 Figures Process Schematic,

General

Shale Line 4 Method 26A Sampling

Train ............................. 6 Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Field Data Sheets Appendix A. 1 Method

5/26A Data Sheets Appendix A.2 Gravimetric

Analyses Appendix A.3 Example

Calculations Analytical Appendix B. 1 Appendix B.2 Analytical

Report Acid Gas Sample

Calculations Dry Gas Meter Calibration

Sheets Process DataAir- Tech Environmental,

LL C General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) March 13, 2006 Pa el i.O iNTRODUCTiON Air-Tech Environmental

had been requested

by General

Shale Brick to provide testing services at their Moncure,

NC facility to determine

compliance

with 15A NCAC 2D. 1100 (Control

of Toxic Air Pollutants),

15A NCAC 2D. 1111 (Maximum

Achievable

Control Technology),

and 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart

JJJjj (National

Emission

Standards

for Hazardous

Air Pollutants

for Brick and Structural Clay Products

Manufacturing).

Testing was performed

at the inlet and outlet of the dry line absorber

(DLA) (Kiln 4-ES-K41•rj•IO_•2 Th ollutants

of interest and test methods

employed

in emissions

characterizations

are tabulated

below.
Testing at the DLA inlet and at the stack, post DLA, was conducted

simultaneously.

PM concentration was reported

for the outlet only. Three 60-minute

test runs were conducted. Testing was coordinated

by General

Shale's Warren Paschal.

Steve Hall, of the NCDENR,

was on site to observe

the testing. This report presents

the results of the sampling

in Section 2. A description

of the test methods and results of the quality control measures

that were taken are contained

in Sections

3 and 4, respectively. Executive Summary A summary

of the results is presented

in the following

table. Compliance

with Subpart JJJJJ has been demonstrated

for HCI and HF removal

efficiency

as well as the mass emission, the HCI rate, and the PM mass rate..Air- Tech Environmental,

LL C General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) oMarch._13, 200• General Shale Results

Summary 212006 Testing.

Line 4

Run #

HF

HCI 2 99.3

49.8
Subpart JJJJJ Emission

Limits:

0.057 0.056 0.12 HF0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003 Emission

Rate (/b/Ton) 0.029 0.028 0.027

PM0.110.07 0.10 0.028 Ib HF/Ton Brick or • 90% DRE; Ib HCl/l'on

Brick or _> 89% DRE; Ib PM/Ton

brickAir- Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) March 13, 2006 Pa e3 2.0 RESULTS

SUMMARY Three test runs were conducted

for the determination

of PM emission

rates and acid gas scrubber removal

efficiency.

Detailed

test summaries

grouped

by test method

are presented below. Efforts were made, successfully,

to collect all samples

during production

of a single type of product.

The brick production

rate during the testing averaged

19.93 tons per hour. (Note: The permitted

max process

rate is 20.55 tons/hr; the max normal process

operation

rate is 20 tons/hr; target process

rate is 19 tons/hr).

The DLA lime feed rate was 110 pounds/hour. Scrubber pressure

drop averaged

0.459" H20 during the testing. 2.1 HF and HCI Sampling

Results Though water droplets

were not present in the gas streams

sampled,

all samples

were collected isokinetically at both test locations

to comply with PM sampling

procedures.

Summaries

of the HF and HCI flue gas concentrations

and mass rates are presented

in Tables 1 and 2. Sampling procedures for all tests did comply with the field sampling

procedures

pertaining

to sample train operation. The average

HF removal

efficiency

was found to be 98.9%, ranging from a low of 98.6% to a high of 99.3%.

In all cases, the removal

efficiency

of the DLA for HF exceeded

the 90% required by the MACT.

Mass emission

rates of HF totaled an average

of 0.003 Ib/ton brick produced. HCI removal

efficiency

averaged

49.7% for the three tests performed.

Individual

values obtained for simultaneously

performed

tests ranged from a low of 49.1% to a high of 50.4%.

The average mass emission

rate of HCI was 0.028 Ib/ton brick, which is less than and within the NESHAP mass rate standard

of 0.056 Ib/Ton.

Run # 234

Time 1307-1410 1440-1545 1615-1728

Table 1. HF Results

Summary Concentration (ppm) Inlet 83.0 57.4 55.1 66:2 Outlet 0.60 0.810.63 0•68

Mass Rate (Ib/hr) Inlet 7.60 5.04 4.08 5.59 Outlet 0.05 0.070.06 0i06

Mass Rate (/b/ton)

% Outlet • DRE 0.003 99,398.6 0.003 98.698i9Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) March 13, 2006 Pa e4 Table 2. HCI Results

Summary Concentration

•

• (ppm) Mass Rate (Ib/hr) Time 1307-1410 1440-1545 1615-1728 Run # 234 Inlet 6.82 6.68 7.837:06

Outlet

Inlet 3.63 1.16

3.43 1.10

Outlet 0.58 0.53 0:55 2.2 Particulate

Sampling

Results Mass Rate (/b/ton)

% Outlet DRE 0.029 49.8 0.028 4 49.1 p.o28 Particulate sampling

was performed

for the determination

of filterable

PM using the procedures of Method 5. The results of this testing are summarized

in Table 3. Only emissions

data are required for the MACT and therefore

only DLA outlet data have been tabulated

for this report. The average

emission

rate of PM was found to be 1.81 Ib/hr, These results were obtained

from testing conducted

during the production,

on average,

of 19.93 tons per hour of brick. Emissions in terms of the MACT were 0.091 Ib PM/ton brick, well within the requirements

of Subpart

JJJjj.

Run # 234 Table 3. PM Results

Summary Production Rate 19.93 19.93 19.93 19.93

Concentration 0.093 0.0055 0.0079 0:076 Particulate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 2.25 1.30 1.891•8•

Emission

Rate (Ib/Ton) 0.065 0.095Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391.GenSh) March 13, 2006 3.0 SAMPLING

AND ANALYTICAL

METHODS The samples

were collected

from the exhaust

of the Line 4 brick kiln, a natural gas fired process operating continuously

24 hours per day, seven days per week. There was no PM control of emissions from this source; acid gases were scrubbed

in a dry lime absorber

prior to exhaust.

A schematic of the process

exhaust

is contained

in Figure 1. Inlet samples

were collected

from a circular duct approximately

4 feet in diameter.

Two sampling ports, placed at right angles, provided

for access to the uncontrolled

gas sample. These ports were in a straight run of duct easily meeting

the 8 and 2 requirements

of Method 1. A total of 12 points were sampled

during each test. A schematic

of this test location

sho•,ing sample point location

on the "Traverse

Point Location

Form" has been appended

with the test data. DLA outlet sampling

was conducted

at the exhaust

stack. This sampling

location

also met the requirements of Method

1 allowing

a 12 point test to be conducted.

A schematic

of this location on the "Traverse

Point Location

Form" showing

point placement

has been appended

as well. Sampling was performed

according

to the procedures

of Method 26A at both test locations, though only the outlet PM results have been presented

in this report. Three one hour samples were collected

simultaneously

at each sampling

location.

Concurrent

with the testing readings of DLA pressure

drop were made by placing a differential

pressure

gauge in parallel with the facility monitor.

These readings

were taken manually

at approximately

15 minute intervals

and were not found to be significantly

different

than the facility monitor.

An actual calibration

of the facility monitor was not attempted.. The sampling

was conducted

according

to the procedures

of EPA Method

26A. These procedures entail isokinetic

collection

of a particulate

sample followed

by collection

of acid gases in dilute solutions

of sulfuric acid. A schematic

of this sampling

train is contained

in Figure 2.. Note that the caustic impingers

used for the collection

of diatomic

halogens

was not used. The flue gas sample was collected

through

a glass nozzle into a glass probe. Particulate

matter was filtered through

a heated teflon filter and then entered the impinger

portion of the sampling train. This impinger

portion consisted

of two impingers

containing

100 ml of 0.1N sulfuric acid followed by an empty impinger,

then a silica gel containing

impinger

used for final moisture collection. A type S pitot tube and type K thermocouple

were used to measure

velocity pressures and temperatures

at each sampling

point. A calibrated

dry gas meter was used to measure sample volume.

A calibrated

orifice placed on the meter outlet was used to set sample rate for isokinetic

sampling.Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391.GenSh) March 13, 2006 ,,Page 6•

Line 4 Kiln DLA >50' !>10'

Figure 1. Process

Schematic,

General

Shale Line 4Air-Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) Ma_ r•ch 13_,•

Fifte• Temperature Sensor

Figure 2. Method

26A Sampling

TrainAir- Tech Environmental,

LL C General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) March 13•,• Sample recovery

resulted

in the collection

of the following

sample fractions. Acetone washes,

with brushing,

of those portions

of the sample train upstream

of the filter. The filter. The sulfuric acid impinger

solutions

and water rinses of all exposed

glass surfaces downstream from the filter to the inlet to the silica gel impinger. The silica gel. Acetone washes

were dried down in tared beakers

for the gravimetdc

determination

of weight gain. This gain, added to that determined

for the tared filters, made up the particulate

total of the sample.

The total mass of PM collected

was divided by the sample volume to determine particulate concentration

(gr/dscf).

This value was multiplied

by flue gas flow rate to determine mass emission

rate (Ib/hr). Mass emissions

were divided by production

rates to determine emissions in terms of brick production

rates (Ib/ton).

Complete

example

calculations

as well as the analytical

and run data have been appended. The acid matrix samples

were analyzed

for fluoride and chloride

ions following

the ion chromatography analytical

procedures

of Method

26A. These analyses

yielded liquid concentrations for the ions of interest

(ug/ml).

Conversions

of ion concentration

to acid concentration were made on a one to one basis. These acid concentrations

were then converted to total mass of the compound

of interest collected

using the liquid sample volume. This total mass was then converted

to mass rates for each sampling

location

in fashion similar to the particulate

matter calculations.

DLA removal

efficiencies

were calculated

based on the calculated mass rates of the compounds

of interest at the inlet and outlet. Complete

analytical summaries and example

calculations

have been appended. After noting the post test weight gain, the silica gel was discarded.

This weight gain was added to that determined

for the rest of the impinger

train prior to sample recovery.

The total weight gain of the impinger

train was attributed

to flue gas water vapor and used for flue gas moisture fraction calculations

(Method

4). Flue gas fixed gas analysis

was performed

on bags collected during each test using the grab procedures

of Method

3 using an Orsat combustion

analyzer. These data, along with the velocity pressure

and temperature

(Method

2) determined

each sample point (Method

1) during the performance

of the isokinetic

sampling

were used to calculate flue gas volumetric

flow rates used in mass rate calculations.Air.Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391oGenSh) March13,2006 Page9 QUALITY ASSURANCE

/ QUALITY

CONTROL The Quality Assurance

(QA) procedures

required

by the reference

methodologies

employed during the testing were strictly adhered

to during the performance

of this test program.

Such adherence ensures

production

of useful and valid data throughout

the course of the project.

An analytical audit was not provided

to Air-Tech

for analysis,

therefore

the measures

made as described below comprise

the analytical

QA. Control criteria for these measures

are not specified in the method.

The QA procedures

described

in this section represent

an integral part of the overall sampling

and analytical

scheme.

The acceptance

criteria, control limits, and the results of these measures

obtained

during this testing and analysis

are summarized

in Table 4. A brief discussion

of the QA measures

is presented

below. QA measures

taken to provide some assessment

of the quality of sample collection

included measures of sampling

rate, and the assessment

of the accuracy

of metered

gas volumes

and the integrity

of sampling

train. Sampling

rates, assessed

as % I•0kinetics,

met method

criteria for all test runs. Therefore,

any sample bias caused by non representative

collection

of differing particle sizes (either particulate

matter or water droplets)

was within acceptable

limits. Though the dry gas meters used for sample volume determination

meet method

criteria for accuracy

the inlet gas meter does not meet accuracy

criteria without application

of the meter correction

factor. Post test sample train leak checks meet the method

criteria for Runs 2-4, the tests presented

in this report. The initial inlet test did not pass the post test leak check and therefore

Run 1 was not analyzed. The analytical

measures

of QA meet the method

criteria for acetone

purity, an assessment

of the Method

5 analysis.

The Method 26A analytical

QC relies on performance

of an audit to be provided at the NCDENR

discretion.

In absence

of such a sample the analytical

QA assessment was made based on the measurements

tabulated

in Table 4. These data show that the analysis suffered no significant

bias due to the reagents

or the sample matrix. All duplicate

analysis show a precision

of measurement

of exceeding

2% of the reported

value for all measurements. The calibration

linearity

indicates

the results will be accurate

regardless

of where they fall on the calibration curve.Table 4. QA Summary

Air=Tech Environmental,

LLC General Shale Test Report (AT05-0391-GenSh) Marc_h 13, 2_0.06 Page Sampling Criteria % Isokinetics Dry Gas Meter Calibration

(M26) Post Test Calibration

Check (M26A) Sample Train Leak Rate (M26A) Analytical Acetone Blank (M5) H2SO4 Field Blank (M26A) H2SO4 Lab Blank (M26A) Lab Water Blank (M26A) =Matrix Spike Recovery Duplicate Analysis,

Inlet Duplicate Analysis,

Outlet Calibration Linearity Control Limit 100 + 10% 1.00 + 2% Yd +5% <0.02 cfm

-< 0.001 wt % Result

Outlet 98 99% Inlet 1.0212 Outle• 0.9956 Inlet 1.0288 Outlet 1.0209 Inlet 0.01 0.02 Outlet 0.00 0.005

HF ND HCl ND HF 109% HCI 102% HF 0.0 0.9% HCI 0.0- 1.2% HF 0.1 1.3% HCI O.8 1.3% HF R 2 0.9998 HCI R 2 0.9994 Inlet 101-106%Appendix A Field Data

Sheets Appendix A.1 Appendix A.2 Appendix A,3 Method 5/26A Data Sheets Gravimetric Analyses Example CalculationsAppendix A.I Method 5/26A Data

SheetsSep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.03

Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

XAD Numl>m"
:Numi•r -" ".. So•u•on.
123
4
56
7

Solution

Configuration

Total Weight Gain (g) Figure 14 Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6•: General

Shale Brick Start Time: 131 Date: 02/10/2006 End Time: 1410 Location: Inlet Initial Leak Check:

0.00@10" Run Number: 2 Final Leak Check:

.02@6" 5/26A Total Samp_ling

Time (min) Corrected Barometric

Pressure

(in Hg) Absolute Stack Pressure

(in Hg) Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) e Stack Temperature 60.( 33.80 33.871.00 321.75 Stack Area (sq in) Actual Meter Volume

(cu ft) e Meter Pressure

(in H20) 49.843 e Meter Temperature

(°F) 2.30 Moisture Collected

(g) 83.42 Carbon Dioxide Concentration

(%V) 83.80 Oxygen Concentration

(%V) 0.0 itrogen Concentration

(%V) 20.9 Dry Gas Meter Factor 79. Nozzle Diameter

(in) 1.021 Pitot Constant 0.307 Sampling Rate (dscfm) Standard Metered

Volume

(dscf) 56.149 Standard Metered

Volume

(dscm) 1.,• Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas 6.56 0.93,1 Dry Molecular

Weight 28.8• Wet Molecular

Weight 28.12 Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) 2409.81 Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 2463.01

734.51 41218.02 Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) Rate (dscfm) Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) Percent Isokinetic 833.84 Percent Excess Air 105.75 Concentration (g/dscm) -1174157.30 Concentration (kg/hr) 0.( Concentration (ppmv) 1167.29

0.000.0( Emissions (Ib/hr) 0.0(IISep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmntl 9]9-572-2203
Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6 P.Q3

• Numt•"

7 Solution

Amount

of 8oiution (g) lmpinger lip Configuration

F•gur:e 14 (g) Impinger Weight Initial(g),

.Gm•n'Cg)

total Weight Gain (g)': General

Shale Brick Date: 02/10/2006 Location: Inlet Run Number: 3 •e: 5/26A Total Samp_ling

Time (rain) Corrected Barometric

Pressure

(in Hg) Absolute Stack Pressure

(in Hg) Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) Average Stack Temperature

(° ,F) Actual Meter Volume

(cu ft) Average Meter Press[ire

(in H20) .•rag Meter Temperature

(°F) Moisture Collected

(g) Carbon Dioxide Concentration

(%V)
en Concentration

(%V) Dry Gas Meter Factor Nozzle Diameter

(in) Pitot Constant •rage Sampling

Rate (dscfm) Standard Metered

Volume

(dscf) Metered Volume

(dscm) Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas Dry Molecular

Weight Wet Molecular

Weight Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) "ic Flow Rate (acfm) Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) Percent Isokinetic Percent Excess Air Concentration (g/dscm) Concentration (kg/hr) Concentration (ppmv) Emissions• Start Time: End Time: Initial Leak Check: Final Leak Check:

.000@8" .01@6"

1440 1545

33.7• 33.771.00 324.58 2463.01 47.84•2.16 84.33 74.000.020.979.1 1.0212 0.307 0.•0.892 53.536 1.5166,11 0.9:28.84 28.17 2313.2z 705,08 3956(1120. 28215.799.05 1 -1174157.300.00 0.10.0•O.OtuJW

uJ 0Sep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.03
Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

Im#n• • Numb•"

,
I

4
5

7 Im•nger

Tip COnr•juration

Figure 14

Impinger

Weight.;

i.; ::: Initial(g)

Total Weight Gain (9) Moisture Recovery

Form for Me£hods

4,5,6Facility: General

Shale Brick Start Time: 1615 Date: 02/10/2006 End Time: 1720 Location: Inlet Initial Leak Check:

.00@6" Run Number: 4 Final Leak Check: 0 5/26A Total Sampling

Time (min) 60.0 Corrected Barometric

Pressure

(in Hg) 29.! Absolute Stack Pressure

(in Hg) Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) 30.01 Temperature (°F) 1.00 Stack Area (sq in) 322.08 Actual Meter Volume

(cuft) 2463.01 43.546 le Meter Pressure

(in H20) 1,75 e Meter Temperature

(°F) 86.7' Moisture Collected

(g) Carbon Dioxide

Concentration

(%V) 72.50 Concentration (%V) 0.0 len Concentration

(%V) 20.9 Dry Gas Meter Factor 79.1 Nozzle Diameter

(in) 1.02" Pitot Constant 0.307 Sampling Rate (dscfm) 0.84, 0.720 Standard Metered

Volume

(dscf) Standard Metered

Volume

(dscm) 43.173 (%V) 1,223 Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas 7.32 0.927 Dry Molecular

Weight 28.84 Wet Molecular

Weight 28.04 Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) 2214.• metric F 675.08 Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 37882.7! Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 1072.84 Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) Percent Isokinetic 673,22 Percent Excess Air 100.72 Concentration (g/dscm) -1174157.31 Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 Concentration (ppmv) 0.01 Emission s (Ib/hr) 0.000Sep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.03
Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

'Filtec:Numbe• XAD Numbe• Imp[nge• Number

6

Amou•t of Solution
• (g)

lmpinger Tip Configura6on Final(g) Impinger

Weight, Initial(g)

Total Weight Gain (g) G•J'n-.(g)

Figure 14 Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6Traverse Plant Date•

Location • t" •., Total Duct De tm•_b_(Distanc

e A) (Inside Far Wall to Outside

of NippI /Port) Nipple/Port Length (Distance

B) Inside Near Wall to Outside

End of Nipple/Port) Stack Depth (Dist A Dist B) Stack Width (If rectangular) .N.eare•• urbance Nearest Downstream

Di----E•rbance Calculator

Traverse Point Number Point

Location

Form Sample

• Information_[ Number

Schematic of Sampling

Location (Cross Section

of Duct) Product of Columns 2&3

Distance B

Traverse

Point Location from Outside

of Nipple (sum of columns

4 & 5)DATA SHEET

FOR VERIFICATION

OF CYCLONIC

FLOW
Test No,

•)•.• Sampling Location: Date:

•i tO (•

Pre-Test Velocity Leak Check: Post-Test Velocity Leak Check:

Time Traverse

Point L•P (in. H20 at 0 Reference

Null Point Rotation Angle (+- •)

Comments

Recorded by: Calibration Data Inclined Manometer Magnehelic No. Pitot Tube No. (Cal: N/A (Cal:__) (Cal:__)

Average

(Absolute

Values of •):Sep-09-98 09:44A

Air--•ech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.O3

Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

XAD Number

7 Impinger Solution

Amount of Solution Im•ing•r Tip Configurat•n

Impinge• Weight

2q q' o

Total Weight Gain (g) Figure 14 Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

,Gm'n:Cg)Facility: General

Shale Brick Start Time: Date: 02/10/2006 End Time: Location: Scrubber

Out Initial Leak Check: Run Number: 2 Final Leak Check: M5 / HCI 1410
Total Sampling

Time (min) Corrected Barometric

Pressure

(in Hg) 60.• Absolute Stack Pressure

(_in Hg) 29.89 Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) 29.87 Temperature (°F) -0.1 Stack Area ..(sq in) 295-,• Actual Meter Volume

(cu ft) 2733.! rage Meter Pressure

(in H20) 44.2 rage Meter Temperature

(°F) 2.00 Moisture Collected

(g) 55.67 Carbon Dioxide Concentration

(%V) (%V) 0.0 en Concentration

(%_V) 21 Dry Gas Meter Factor 79." Nozzle Diameter

(in) 0.9956 Pitot Constant 0.3 Rate (dscfm) 0.84 Standard Metered

Volume

(dscf) 0.7• Standard Metered

Volume

(dscm) 45.311.283 Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas )ry Molecular

Weight 0.932 Wet Molecular

Weight 28.• Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) 28.10 Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) 2246.94 684.87 Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) Flow Rate (dscfm) 42660.14 1208 Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) Percent Isokinetic Percent Excess Air Concentration (g/dscm) Concentration (kg/hr) 785.46 98.65 -1174157.300.00 0.0q Concentration (ppmv) Emissions (Ib/hr) 0.0(Sep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.03
Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

Filt• Nurnbe¢ XAD Numtmr Im•ng• Number

7

Amount of Solution (g) lmpinger Tip Configurat}on

Figure 14

Impinger Woight Final Initial

Total Weight Gain (g) .Gain(g)

Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6Date: Location: Run Number:

General

Shale Brick 02/10/2006 Scrubber Out3 M5 / HCI Start Time: End Time: Initial Leak Check: Final Leak Check: Total Sampli_ng

Time (rain) Corrected Barometric

Pressure

Iin Hg) Absolute Stack Pressure

(inHg) Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) perature_(°F) Stack Area (sq in)_ Actual Meter Volume

(c u ft) ;rage Meter Pressure

(in H20) rage Meter Temperature

(°F) Moisture Collected

(-g) Carbon Dioxide Concentration

(%V) n (%v) en Concentration

(%V) Dry Gas Meter Factor Nozzle Diameter

(_in) Pitot Con stantSampling

Rate (dscfm) Standard Metered

Volume

(dsc• Standard Metered

Volume

(dscm) Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas Molecular Weight Wet Molecular

Weight Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) ic Flow Rate (dscfm) Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) Percent Isokinetic Percent Excess Air Concentration (g/dscm) Concentration (kg/hr) Concentration (ppmv) 1440 1545

60.•
297.67 2733.972.06 59.4: 68.7(0.020.9 0.9956 0.3100.84 0.763
0.934 28.84 28.12 2280.( 694.9 1225.92 796.598.2, -1174157.300.000.("iSep-09-98 09:44A

Air-Tech

Envrnmnt] 919-572-2203 P.03
Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6

FifferNumb• XAD Number Imp[nge•" Number Impinge," Solution

Amount of Solution (g) [mpinger Tip Configuratkm

Impinger

Weight Final Initial(g)

w•ght(g)

Total Weight Gain (g) Figure 14 -Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6Facility: General

Shale Brick Start Time: 161---•- Date: 02/10/2006 End Time: 1716 Location: Scrubber

Out Initial Leak Check:

0.002@10" Run Number: 4 Final Leak Check"

0.000@5" M5 / HCI Total Sampling

Time (min) 60.0- Corrected Barometric

Pressure

(in Hg) 29.89 Absolute Stack Pressure

(in Hg) 29.87 Stack Static Pressure

(in H20) -0.19 ]ge Stack Temperature

(°F) 297.17 Stack Area (sq in) 2733.97 Actual Meter Volume

(cu ft) 45.124 Average Meter Pressure

(in H20) 2.10 Average Meter Temperature

(°F) 56.88 Moisture Collected

(g) 74.40 Carbon Dioxide Concentration

(%V) 0.0 (%V) 20.9 itrogen Concentration

(%V) 79.1 )ry Gas Meter Factor 0.9956 Nozzle Diameter

(in) 0.310 Pitot Constant 0.84 Average Sampling

Rate (dscfm) 0.768 Standard Metered

Volume

(dscf) 46.085 Standard Metered

Volume

(dscm) 1.3057.0• Mole Fraction

Dry Stack Gas 0.929 Dry Molecular

Weight 28.84 Wet Molecular

Weight 28.07 Stack Gas Velocity

(fpm) 2304.75 Stack Gas Velocity

(mpm) 702.49 Volumetric Flow Rate (acfm) 43757.74 Volumetric Flow Rate (acmm) 1239.22 Volumetric Flow Rate (dscfm) 28310.63 Volumetric Flow Rate (dscmm) 801.76 Percent Isokinetic 98.27 Percent Excess Air -1174157.30 Concentration (g/dscm) 0.00 Concentration (kg/hr) 0.00 Concentration (ppmv) 0.00 Emissions ir) 0.00Sep-09--98 09:44A

Air-.Tech

Envrnmntl 919-572-2203 P.03

Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6
i•m•B,ox Number

XAD Number Imp/ngor Numbor

4 Implnger Solution

Amount of Solut•n(g) [mpinger lip Configuration Final(g) Imp•nger Weight Initial

Total Weight Gain (g) .G•u'n

Fiffure 14 Moisture Recovery

Form for Methods

4,5,6DATA SHEET

FOR VERIFICATION

OF CYCLONIC

FLOW

Pre;Test Velocity Leak Check: Post-Test Velocity Leak Check:

Time Traverse

Point Null Point (in. H20 at Rotation Angle Reference (+ Comments

Recorded by:, Calibration Data Inclined Manometer Magnehelic No. Pitot Tube No. (Cal: N/•A (Cal:_•) (Cal:

Average

(Absolute

Values of

tackmeterTraverse Point

Locatio
DateSampling Location Total Duct Depth (Distance

A) (Inside Far Wall to Outside

of Nipple .Nipple/Port Length (Distance

B) /Port)

•,,•. 5 " 5.5

Information

Inside Near Wall to Outside

End of Nipple/Port) Stack Depth (Dist A Dist B) Stack Width (If rectangular) Nearest Upstream

Disturbance Nearest Downstream

Disturbance Calculator

Traverse Point Number Percent

Fraction of Stack ID

Stack

Product

of Columns ID 2&3 (in) (to nearest

1/8 inch) /7.5 Distance B(in)
\/

Traverse

Point Location from Outside

of Nipple (sum of columns

4 & 5) /c/. / Schematic of Sampling

Location (Cr.oss Section

of Duct)Appendix A.2 Gravirnetric Analyses%Temp:

Oqz.ooV- o(,(3-" o-7 z..o o Vo..T•3

29. :¢rt•) 8•. •t•3

¢/Project

Name: Page

T•me: %Temp: 100 G

"80,

o2-.ProJec•

N•me:

T•me: % RH: T•mp: 100 G IG

-0,53

9lOW' "Ta ql
•, 6 q39

C,9al3

/, 0o0o I O, qOlo

O, "1010 O, "1o3o O, '70• S O, ?oqq O. 'lto •

O, 70?,4 7oo•"
"Io 2 ff ?o•,o

,/

V./

,/V

f

VPage

No._

Witnessed & Understood

by me,

Date To Page Invented by • Date Recorded byExample CalculationsSAM PLE CALCU

LATiONS
Volume of dry gas sampled

at standard

conditions

(68°F, 29.92 "Hg): V,,(std) = Y x Vn• x 528 × [Pbar + (J•H / 13.6] 29.92 × (T m + 460) Volume of water vapor at standard

conditions: Vw = 0.04715

cf/gm x M w Fractional moisture

content

in stack gas:

Mole fraction

of dry stack gas: Md = 1 Bws Vm(std ) + Vw(sTD)

Absolute stack gas pressure: PS • Pbar

Static 13.6Average molecular

weight

of stack gas (Ib/Ib.mole): Dry: MW• = (.32 x %O•) + (.44 x %CO•)

+ [.28 x {100 (%O• + %CO2)}] Wet: MW, = [MW d x (1 Bw,)] + (18 x Bw,)
Stack gas velocity

at stack conditions

(ft/sec): Vs = 85.49 × .84 x •r

X

Ts + 460 P, x Average stack gas volumetric

flow at dry, standard

conditions

(DSCFM): 528xP• x 60sec e,• = V, x As x M• x (T, + 460)x 29.92

rain
Concentration of VOC"CVOC

= Cth c Cm
VOC mass loading:

Evoc

2.49 x 10 .6 x Qs• x Cvoc
Destruction efficiency:DRE (•,;..•.•)

100 =='VOCiIsokinetic sampling

rate (%): C = .0945 for English

Units
I% =

C x Vr,(,td x (T, + 460) V s x t x Ps x M• x,•
Particulate concentration

(gr/dscf): Cs Nip ×

15.43 grains g Vm(std) Particulate emission

rate (Ib/hr).

E •

C$ 7000 grains/Ib

x Qsd x Particulate emission

rate (Ib PM/ton

Product)- E' = E / Production

Rate (tons per hour)60 min hrDefinitions AHAP

BTU/hr BwsCMCsCS02CTHCDnDRE EEEOIEvocEvoclEvoco E'MdMFM,•MWdMWsPbarPsQsdStatic tTmTPD average

meter orifice pressure

(in. H20) velocity pressure

(in. H20)
area of nozzle (ft 2)
cross sectional

area of duct (ft 2) heat input mole fraction of wet gas (unitless) concentration of methane

(ppm) particulate concentration

(gr/dscf) sulfur dioxide concentrations

(Ibldscf) concentration of total hydrocarbon

(ppm) diameter of nozzle (in) destruction/removal efficiency

(%) emission rate (Ib/hr)
mass rate, compound

of interest (Ib/hr) emission rate of VOC (Ib/hr) control device inlet mass loading (Ib/hr) control device outlet mass loading (Ib/hr) emission rate (Ib/10 • BTU) mole fraction of dry gas (unitless)
mass of filter, post test (g)
mass of particulate

(g)
mass of water collected

(g) flue gas molecular

weight, dry basis (Ib/Ib-mole) flue gas molecular

weight, wet basis (Ib/Ib-mole) barometric pressure

(in. Hg) absolute stack pressure

(in. Hg) flue gas dry volumetric

flow @ STP (ft3/min) stack static pressure

(in. H20) test time (min) average meter temperature

(°F) acid production

rate, tons per dayDefinitions msPg/gpg/ml v.V•Vm(std) VOCv,v.Y average

flue gas temperature

(°F) laboratory result, analytical

concentration

of sample laboratory result, analytical

concentration

of sample volume of liquid aliquot analyzed

(ml) volume of liquid recovery

fraction

(ml) actual meter volume (ft z) meter volume @ STP (ft •) non-methane hydrocarbon

(ppm) flue gas velocity

(ft/sec) volume of water vapor condensed

(ft •) dry gas meter correction

factor (unitless)Appendix B Analytical Appendix B.1

Analytical Report Appendix B.2

Acid

Gas

Sample CalculationsAppendix Analytical ReportA r-Tech Environmeata| 3216

S. Alston

Ave. Durham, NC 27713 LLC

General Shale-Moncure Analytical

Report (0206-54)
EPA Meth

o d 2 6A Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen fluoride Enthalpy Analytical, inc. Phone: (919) 850 4392 Fax: (919) 850 9012

www.enthall•y.com 2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703 5518I

certify that to the best of my knowledge

all analytical

data presented

in this report:
® Have been checked for completeness
® Are accurate,

error-free,

and legible
® Have been conducted

in accordance

with approved

protocol, and that all deviations

and analytical problems are summarized

in the appropriate

narrative(s)
® This analytical

report was prepared in Portable Document

Format (.PDF) and contains 91 pages.

QA Review Performed by: Michael Steven SchapiraSummary of ResultsCompany Air-Tech

Environmental Analyst KAM Parameters EPA Method 26A # Samp es 6 runs & 1 blank Client # General Shale Moncure Job #10206-54 PO # Verbal Report Date 2/21/2006 Compound Hydrogen fluoride Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen fluoride Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen fluoride Hydrogen chloride Sample

ID / Catch Weight

(ug) In-02 109,616 16,662 In-03 72,342 15,569 In-04 56,026 14,716 Out-02 643 7,171 Out-03 868 6,799 Out-04 683 6,538 Blank 25.0 ND 33.6 ND

0206-54-results 3/1/2006ResultsE 0 0 0 0 00Narrative SummaryEnthalpy Analytical

Narrative

Summary Company: Air-Tech

Environmental,

LLC Client #: General Shale-Moncure PO #: Verbal Enthalpy

#: 0206-54 Analyst: KAM Parameters: EPA Method 26A Custody Analysis

Separation

Matrix Spikes

Blanks Reproducibility Reporting Notes

Chris Todd of Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. received

the samples at 15.6°C on 2/15/06

after being relinquished

by Air-Tech Environmental, LLC. Prior to analysis the samples were kept under lock with access only by authorized

personnel

of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. The samples were analyzed

according

to the procedures

outlined

in EPA Method 26A. The acid (H2SO4)

matrix samples were analyzed for the chloride

(CI) and fluoride (F) ion. Quantitation was performed

using a Hewlett

Packard

series 1100 High Performance

Liquid Chromatograph

equipped

with a Dionex ED40 Electrochemical

detector

and a Dionex

ASRS-ULTRA® 4-mm autosuppressor. Separation was accomplished

by a Dionex IonPac AS-14A

4 mm x 250 mm colunm, A copy of the acquisition

method

(0106-48.M)

is included. Before and after sample analysis,

calibration

curves were prepared and analyzed.

Fluoride

and chloride

eluted at approximately

2.8 and 3.7 minutes respectively.

Both compounds

separated

well and were easily identified. A 0.500-mL

aliquot of a 100-fold

diluted sample In-02 was spiked with 0.663 lag of hydrogen

fluoride

(HF) using 25.0 laL of a solution containing

26.5 lag/mL HF. The spiked sample was analyzed in the same manner as the other samples.

The calculated HF spike recovery

was 109%. A 0.500-mL

aliquot of a 10-fold diluted sample In-02 was spiked with 1.29 I,tg of hydrogen

chloride

(HC1) using 25.0 laL of a solution containing

51.4 lag/mL HC1. The spiked sample was analyzed in the same manner as the other samples.

The calculated HC1 spike recovery

was 102%. One blank sample Blank was analyzed

and reported.

No blank adjustments were made to any of the reported

data. OKThe I•SO4 matrix samples

were analyzed

for CI and F but are reported as HCI and HF. The peaks listed in the "Sample Chromatograms" section

are labeled

hydrogen

fluoride

and hydrogen chloride.

The additional

molecular

weight contribution from the tf is included

in the results listed on each chromatogram and throughout

the report.General Reporting

Notes The following

are general reporting

notes that are applicable

to all Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. reports, unless specifically noted otherwise. The symbol MDL represents

the Minimuna

Detection

Limit. Below tiffs value the laboratory

cannot confim the presence of the analyte of interest reliably. The symbol LOp_. represents

the Limit of Quantification.

Below this value the laboratory

cannot quantitate the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method. The symbol ND following

a value indicates a non-detect

or analytical

result below the MDL. The symbol J following

a value indicates an analytical

result between the MDL and the LOQ. A J flag indicates that the laboratory

can positively

identify the analyte of interest as present, but the value should be considered

an estimate. The symbol E following

a value indicates an analytical

result exceeding

100% of the highest calibration point. The symbol DF represents

a Dilution Factor. This number represents

dilutions

during the extraction and/or laboratory

stages of sample treatment.

The analytical

result taken from a laboratory

instrument

is multiplied by the DF to get final results. The Sample ID MS represents

a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte so that a percent recovery

value can be determined.

This shows what effect the sample matrix may have on the target analyte, i.e. whether or not anything in the sample matrix prohibits analysis for the analyte(s). The Sample ID MSD represents

a Matrix Spike Duplicate.

Prepared

in the same manner as an MS, the use of duplicate

matrix spikes allows further confumation

of laboratory

quality by showing the consistency of results gained by performing

the sanle steps multiple times. Most methods performed

by Enthalpy do not require analysis of an MSD. The Sample ID BS represents

a Blind Spike. A member of the Quality Assurance

department

has created BS samples for many of the analytes Enthalpy

tests for, and only QA and the Enthalpy

Analytical ownership have access to the actual values of these samples. The laboratory

analyzes

them without knowledge of the actual value, and the spreadsheets

get completed

for these samples solely by the QA group. The Sample ID LCS represents

a Laboratory

Control Sample. Whenever

spikes are prepared

for our clients more spikes are prepared

than needed. The extras (randomly

chosen) are kept in-house at the appropriate temperature

conditions.

When the spike samples come back from the client for analysis, the LCSs (usually two are saved) are analyzed

to confmn that the analyte could be recovered

from the media, separate from the spike samples which were used on the project and which may have had issues caused during collection

and/or transport. Significant Figures:

Where the reported value is much greater than unity (1.00) in the units expressed (specifically values of 1,000 or greater), the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 3 significant

figures. For example, a value of 10,456.45

ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug. There are five significant digits reported, but no confidence

should be placed on more than three significant

digits.Sample CustodySB•NIV.I.NO0 :I0 "ONSample ChromatogramsData

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\032-36(]I.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-02*•!O
Injection Date

2/16/2006

1:26:39

PM

Seq. Line

36 Sample Name

In-02•100 Location

Vial 32 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\O206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09Ak032-3601

.D)

420

400

380.

360

340 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

m•r
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.822 BB 9.CCO

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/mL] 264.26773 9.17877e-3

2.42565
Totals 2.42565 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found
Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:16:36

PM TG Name Hydrogen Fluoride Ilyd•

Page i of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\032_3602.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-02*101 Injection Date

2/16/2006

1:37:28

PM

Seq. Line

36 Sample Name

In-02*100 Location

Vial 32 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHODk0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:]6:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1 •ED

40 (•• Norm.440

420

400

380

360-

340

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2. 820 BB

Area

A•tt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS•s] lug/roLl 260.66632 9. 17893e-3

2.39264 Totals 2.39264 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found Name Hydrogen Fluoride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:1.6:46

PH TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\033-3701"D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-02•3
Injection Date

2/16/2006

1:48:16

PM

Seq. Line

37 Sample Name

In-02*10 Location

Vial 33 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) No[m.440

420'

400

380.

360 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 0206-09Ak033-3701

.D)

340 •

•

,•

•

•

.}

•

mlr
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.812 3.660 VB

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/•]
293.55585 1.26214e-2

3.70508 Totals 3.70508 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator[ i Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:].6:57

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\033_3702.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-02*l( Injection Date

2/16/2006

1:59:02

PM

Seq. Line

37 Sample Name

In-02*10 Location

Vial 33 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1 B, •ED 40,• Norm.440

420

40O

380

360

34O 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 External Standard

Report mi

Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal I: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp Name [mini [uS*s) [ug/mL] 3.662 VB

286.55634

1.26292e-2

3.61899

Hydrogen

Chloride Totals 3.61899 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:]7:07

PM TG Page i of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\034-3801.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-03•l[
Injection Date

2/16/2006

2:09:48

PM

Seq. Line

38 Sample Name

In-03*100 Location

Vial 34 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\034-3801

.D)

420 J

400

380.

•

360. ••_ •//

340. 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

mm
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.820 BB

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp Name [uS*s] [ug/mL] 179.08839 9.18443e-3

1.64483

Hydrogen

Fluoride
Totals 1.64483 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found
Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:17:17

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006Qff\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206_09A\034_3802.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-03*10C Injection Date

2/16/2006

2:20:36

PM

Seq. Line

38 Sample Name

In-03*100 Location

Vial 34 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) AOCI•o • NOIT'n.440

420

400

380

360

340 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 External Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

}•nount [mini [uSes) [ug/mL] 2.818 BB

178.93808

9.18445e-3

1 64345 • Totals 1.64345 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Grp Name Hydrogen Fluoride
Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:]7:25

PM TG Page i of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\O35-390]'D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-03*]
Injection Date

2/16/2006

2:31:21

PM

Seq. Line

39 Sample Name

In-03*10 Location

Vial 35 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Aoq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Aoq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHODX0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOXMETHODX0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) Norm.440

420 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 4010206-09A\035-3901.D)

_•

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

m•__/r
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [rain2.812

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uSes] [ug/mL]
3.656 VB

280.00052

1.26370e-2

3.53836 Totals 3.53836 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

°Name [[•d•,,

•'l•id• Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:17:33

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206_09A\035_3902.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-03"16 Injection Date

2/16/2006

2:42:03

PM Sample Name

In-03*10 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADClB, OionexED40

020•09A•3•zg02.D) Norm.440

420-

400

380

360 Seq. Line

39 Location Vial 35

340..

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal I: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [mini [uS*s] lug/roLl 3.655 BB

280.01413

1.26370e-2

3.53853 Totals 3.53853 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name •I•±• •lu•id• Hydrogen Chloride

miJ

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:17:42

PH TG Page i of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\036-4001.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-04*10
Injection Date

2/16/2006

2:52:52

PM

Seq. Line

40 Sample Name

In-04*100 Locatio•

Vial 36 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHODk0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09Ak036-4001.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

m•r
Zxternal Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

/•Lt/Area

Amount

Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/mL] 2.815 BB

143.11507

9.18885e-3

1.31506

Hydrogen

Fluoride 3.660 Totals 1.31506 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found
Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:17:51PM

TG Page 1 of 2Data

FJ le H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206_09A\036_4002.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-04*10C Injection Date

2/16/2006

3:03:42

PM

Seq. Line

40 Sample Name

In-04*100 Location

Vial 36 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 gl Acq. Method

H:hLC2006QIkGONZOkMETHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:hLC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1B, D•-•exED40(020•09A•Z•4002.D) Norm.440

420

400

380-

360

340 ';'
External Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 Area Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/mL] 140.47032 9. 18926e-3

1.29082 RetTime Type [min] 2.822 PB Totals 1.29082 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Name Hydrogen Fluoride

Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:17:59

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\037-4101.D 0206-54 Sample Name: In-04*l,
Injection Date

2/16/2006

3:14:30

PM

Seq. Line

41 Sample Name

In-04*10 Location

Vial 37 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Aoq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last ehanged

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) N( ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 0206-09A\037-4101

.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

mir
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.012 3.656 BB

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp Name [uS*s] [ug/mL]

iI•d•

Fl•id• 273.37628 1.26452e-2

3.45689

Hydrogen

Chloride Totals 3. 45689 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! i Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found
Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:18:09

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006Ql\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\037_4102 .D 0206-54 Sample Name: Injection Date

2/16/2006

3:25:16

PM

Seq. Line

41 Sample Name

In-04*10 Location

Vial 37 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0106-48•M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1B, Di•-•40102--•-•-9A•Z?.4102.D) NOnT44(

420

400

380

360

340

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Calib. Data Modified Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area [mini [uS*s] 3.658 BB

267.75766

1.26524e-2

3.38778 Totals 3.38778 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors

Signal 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM

Amt/Area Amount

Grp [ug/mL] Name II]'dzsgcn Fluszida Hydrogen Chloride
Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found Instrument 3 2/1.7/2006

3:]8:18

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\038-4401.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-02*l
Injection Date

2/16/2006

4:19:36

PM

Seq. Line

44 Sample Name

Out-02*10 Location

Vial 38 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:kLC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading)

420-

400

380-

360 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\038-4401.D)

340

External

Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor wi•h ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionez

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [min] [uS*s] [ug/mL] 2.812 3.650 PB

132.86073

1.30110e-2

1.72865 Totals 1. 72865 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:18:39

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206_09A\038_4402.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-02*iC
Injection Date

2/16/2006

4:29:42

PM

Seq. Line

44 Sample Name

Out-02*10 Location

Vial 38 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:16:28

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1B, DionexED40(020•09A•Z•4402.D)

42£

400

38C

36O

340 • •

•--r-•-• 2 3

4

5

6

7

8

mir
External Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:05:18

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area [min] [uS*s] 2.•12 3.658 PB Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [ug/mL] 129.38556 1.30301e-2

1.68591 Totals 1.68591 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:18:49

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\O39-4501.D 0206-54 Sample

Name: Out'0
Injection Date

2/16/2006

4:41:14

PM

Seq. Line

45 Sample Name

Out-02 Location

Vial 39 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Aoq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZOkMETHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) No•.440

420

400

38O

360

340 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\039-4501

.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8 •
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2. 942 MF

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/mL] 164.89482 9.18594e-3

1.51471
Totals 1.51471 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:23:28

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206_09A\039_4502.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Ou Injection Date

2/16/2006

4:52:07

PM

Seq. Line

45 Sample Name

Out-02 Location

Vial 39 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1B, DionexED40(020•09A\03•4502.D) Norm.440

420.

400

380

360

340

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.936 MF 3.6C8

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/mL] 168.29863 9.18556e-3

1.54592 Totals 1.54592 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:23:47

PH TG Page I of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\040-4601"D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-03*l•
Injection Date

2/16/2006

5:03:02

PM

Seq. Line

46 Sample Name

Out-03*10 Location

Vial 40 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZO\METHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) Norm.44O

420

400

380

360 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09Ak040-4601

.D)

340 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

mlr
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [min] [uS*s) [ug/mL] 2.9•2 3. 664 PB

114.16257

1 31275e-2

1.49867 Totals 1. 49867 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! i Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:24:05

PM TG Page I of 2Data:File

H:\LC2006Ql\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\040-4602.D Sample Name: Out-03*!( 0206-54 Injeotion Date

2/16/2006

5:]_4:00

PM

Seq. Line

46 Sample Name

Out-03*10 Location

Vial 40 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1B, DionexED40(020•09A•4•4602.D) Norm.440

420

400.

380

360

340

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Faotor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.9•2 3. 658 PB

Area

Amt/Area

•nount

Grp [uSes] [ug/mL] 116.14585 1.31134e-2

1.52307 Totals 1.52307 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! i Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrs•an Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:24:18

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\041-4701"D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-0[
Injection Date

2/16/2006

5:24:47

PM

Seq. Line

47 Sample Name

Out-03 Location

Vial 41 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\MZTHODk0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) Norm.440

420-

400

380

360

340 ADCl B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\041-4701

.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

m•r
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionez

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area [min] [uS*s] 2.878 MF

210.14958

9.18184e-3

Amount

Grp Name [ug/mL] 1.92956 Hydrogen

Fluoride
Totals i. 92956 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Zrrors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found
Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:24:33

PM TG Page i of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\041-4702.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out
Injection Date

2/16/2006

5:35:30

PM

Seq. Line

47 Sample Name

Out-03 Location

Vial 41 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Aeq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:kLC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\041-4702.D)

420

40C

380

360

340 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

m••
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ZD 40 RetTime Type

Area

P•t/Area

Amount

Grp [min] [uSes] [ug/mL] 2.884 MF

209.87709

9.18185e-3

1.92706 3.560 Totals 1.92706 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride

Instrument 3 2/].7/2006

3:24:59

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\042-4801.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-04 •I
Injeotion Date

2/16/2006

5:46:20

PM

Seq. Line

48 Sample Name

Out-04*10 Location

Vial 42 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) a0[m.440

420

400

38O

360

340 ADCl B, Dione× ED 40 (0206-09A\042-4801.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

mm
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [min] [uS*s] [ug/mL] 2. 942 3. 656 PB

117.52390

1.31039e-2

1.54002 Totals 1.54002 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name II•d• 2lu•id= Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:25:12

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\042-4802.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-04*l<
Injection Date

2/16/2006

5:57:11

PM

Seq. Line

48 Sample Name

Out-04*10 Location

Vial 42 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

2 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) NOFF•.440

420

400

380

360.

340 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09Ak042-4802.D)

2 3

4

5
External Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [mini [uS*s] [ug/mL]
•.3.656 PB

114.32556

1.31264e-2

1.50068 Totals 1.50068 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Zrrors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name IIyd•=• Fl•id• Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:25:20

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI.\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\043-4901.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-0r
Injection Date

2/16/2006

6:07:55

PM

Seq. Line

49 Sample Name

Out-04 Location

Vial 43 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZOkMETHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHODk0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) N( ADC'I B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\043-4901.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

m•._•
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [mini 2.896 MF 3. 6CO

Area

Amt/Area

}hmount

Grp [uS*s] [ug/mL] 170.70175 9.18530e-3

1.56795
Totals 1.56795 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Zrrors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride lI•d• l•d•

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:25:36

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\043-4902.D 0206-54 Sample Name: Out-0<'
Injection Date

2/16/2006

6:18:44

PM

Seq. Line

49 Sample Name

Out-04 Location

Vial 43 Acq, Operator

KAM Inj

2 Aoq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Aoq. Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHODk0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZOkMETHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading)

420

400

380

360 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\043-4902.D)

External

Standard

Report mir

Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1,0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal I: ADCl B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.890 MF '3,660

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [uS•s] [ug/mL] 175.28098 9.18481e-3

1,60992 Totals 1. 60992 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Zrrors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride IIyd•. @hi id•

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:25:55

PM TG Page 1 of 2Data

File H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\DATA\FEB2006\0206-09A\044-5001.D 0206-54 Sample

Blank Sample Name:
Injection Date

2/16/2006

6:28:51

PM

Seq. Line

50 Sample Name

Blank*4.09 Location

Vial 44 Acq. Operator

KAM Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 pl Acq. Method

H:\LC2006QI\GONZO\METHOD\0106-48.M Last changed

2/7/2006

1:48:48

PM by TG Analysis Method

H:\LC2006QIkGONZO\METHOD\0206-09Z.M Last changed

2/17/2006

3:22:40

PM by TG (modified after loading) Norm.440

420

400

380

360

340 ADC1 B, Dionex ED 40 (0206-09A\044-5001

.D)

2 3

4

5

6

7

8

mi•r
External Standard

Report
Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 2/17/2006

3:22:56

PM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex

ED 40 RetTime Type

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp [min] [uS*s] [ug/mL] 2.942 3. 660 Totals 0.00000 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator! 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Name Hydrogen Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride

Instrument 3 2/17/2006

3:26:13

PM TG Page 1 of 2Appendix Sample CalculationsAppendi× C Gas Meter Calibration SheetsO• •-•. • • 0 0 0

c•c• • O C) 143 0 0C• 0 C3Appendix D Process Data