alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Independent Accountants' Review Report
The Audit Committee of the Board of DirectorsThree Rivers Bancorp, Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months then ended, and the consolidated statements of cash flows and changes in stockholders' equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000,presented herein, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein, and in our report dated January 31, 2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & YoungPittsburgh PennsylvaniaNovember 9, 2001


39


November 9, 2001The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc.
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-39160) pertaining to the Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-39166) pertaining to the Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52798) pertaining to the Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. 401(k) Plan of our report dated November 9, 2001 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Three Rivers Bancorp, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPPittsburgh, Pennsylvania


40
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment.                    

*Date:*                         May 2, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bita Nakhai, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-7701,                         *nakhaib@nia.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 31, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-8185 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §3147. Penalty for an offense committed while on release

A person convicted of an offense committed while released under this chapter shall be sentenced, in addition to the sentence prescribed for the offense, to—

(1) a term of imprisonment of not more than ten years if the offense is a felony; or

(2) a term of imprisonment of not more than one year if the offense is a misdemeanor.

A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be consecutive to any other sentence of imprisonment.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §203(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1983; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §223(g), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2028; Pub. L. 99–646, §55(g), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3147, added Pub. L. 89–465, §3(a), June 22, 1966, 80 Stat. 215, related to appeals from conditions of release, prior to repeal in the revision of this chapter by section 203(a) of Pub. L. 98–473.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–646 substituted "under" for "pursuant to" in two places and "for the offense," for "for the offense".

1984—Pub. L. 98–473, §223(g), struck out "not less than two years and" after "imprisonment of" in par. (1), and "not less than ninety days and" after "imprisonment of" in par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–646 effective 30 days after Nov. 10, 1986, see section 55(j) of Pub. L. 99–646, set out as a note under section 3141 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
§ 334.5 Amendment of application for naturalization; reopening proceedings. ( a ) *Clerical amendments* — ( 1 ) *By applicant.* An applicant may request that the application for naturalization be amended either prior to or subsequent to the administration of the oath of allegiance.
( 2 ) *By Service.* The Service may amend, at any time, an application for naturalization when in receipt of information that clearly indicates that a clerical error has occurred.
( 3 ) *Amendment procedure.* Any amendment will be limited to the correction of clerical errors arising from oversight or omission. If the amendment is approved, the amended application shall be filed with the original application for naturalization.
( b ) *Substantive amendments.* Any substantive amendments which affect the jurisdiction or the decision on the merits of the application will not be authorized. When the Service is in receipt of any information that would indicate that an application for naturalization should not have been granted on the merits, the Service may institute proceedings to reopen the application before admission to citizenship, or to revoke the naturalization of a person who has been admitted to citizenship, in accordance with section 340 of the Act and § 335.5 of this chapter.
[56 FR 50496, Oct. 7, 1991]
#### § 76.676 Judicial review of a bypass action.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339, Aug. 29, 2024.

If a grantee or subgrantee is dissatisfied with the Secretary's final action after a proceeding under §§ 76.672 through 76.675, it may, within 60 days after receiving notice of that action, file a petition for review with the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the State is located.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 2727(b)(4)(B)-(D), 2972(h)(2)-(4), 2990(c), 3223(c))

[54 FR 21776, May 19, 1989]
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omphalos, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)), as amended;
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      9, 2010
                /s/
      Sheng-Peir
      YangSheng-Peir
      YangChief
      Executive Officer
*= STATE {JP MAINL OFFIC:li OF T'HL GOVERNOR ( I STATE HOUSF. STATION t^ AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-o00Il
Paul R. I. aPage

caovFaNOH March 24, 2014 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy: Our nation's ethanol policies have been adding costs to our gasoline and should be repealed. While this federal mandate should be eliminated by Congress, I encourage you to utilize your authority under the Clean Air Act to reduce the federal mandate, and ensure that the compliance costs with this policy do not spike and exacerbate the price of gasoline. Since these polices were put in place in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, gasoline prices have increased, energy content of our fuel has gone down, and hundreds of Mainers have incurred costs to their snowmobiles and boats because of the failure of ethanol to work in these engines. While I strongly believe the federal government should scrap these polices and focus on actual research and development, I am alarmed by the potential additional economic costs associated with what has been described as the "blendwall," when federal mandates exceed what 10 percent ethanol (E10) can deliver through the current fuel delivery infrastructure. The federal mandates would create scarcity beyond what can be delivered safely through E10 and could lead to an artificially high cost for refineries to comply with federal law. This situation could limit the supply of gasoline for U.S. consumption and result in severe economic harm to consumers and the overall economy. EPA has the authority under the Clean Air Act to waive down the volumes required to be blended in 2014, and we encourage these amounts to be decreased in 2015 as well. I strongly urge EPA to avoid the blendwall and the corresponding negative economic consequences by reducing ethanol volumes requirements to a level that could be delivered with E 10. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

^aul 

### • I f 9 , R. LePa e g Governor

^•^

I'Iiln'IFI—h 1—'1f'I I.I) I'.AI'1'.12 PHONL: (207) 287-3531 (Voice) TTY USER5 CALL 711 FAX: (207) 287-1034 www.niainc.guv
Regulatory Announcement

Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

From Mobile Sources 

Early Credit Technology Requirement 

Revision 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is revising the February 26, 2007 mobile source air toxics rule (MSAT2) 

requirement regarding the benzene control technologies that qualify 

a refiner to generate early benzene credits. This action adds another 

specific benzene control technology, benzene alkylation, to the four 

operational or technological changes that the 2007 rule currently allows. 

This action also allows refiners to request EPA approval of other 

benzene-reducing operational changes or technologies for the purpose 

of generating early credits. 

Background 

This action started as a direct final rulemaking (DFRM)[73 FR 13132, March 12, 

2008]. We received adverse comment on the DFRM, so it was withdrawn. A parallel 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) accompanied the DFRM in case adverse 

comment was received. This action finalizes the NPRM. 

Commenters were primarily concerned that the rule would not result in reduced 

benzene vehicle emissions, and would increase vehicle aromatics emissions. This 

action shows that while fuel aromatics and fuel benzene levels both affect vehicle 

benzene emissions, fuel benzene has more than a 20-fold impact on benzene 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

EPA420-F-08-030 

 October 2008 
emissions from vehicles than other fuel components, including fuel aromatics levels. Alkylation 

or any other benzene reduction technology reduces benzene vehicle exhaust emissions more 

than 95%. There is less than a 1% difference among benzene reduction technologies in their effectiveness 

at reducing benzene vehicle emissions. Also, converting the small amount of benzene in gasoline 

(1 vol%) to aromatics would increase the fuel aromatics levels minimally (compared to total 

fuel aromatics of 20-40 vol%), and thus would have a correspondingly minimal effect on vehicle 

aromatics emissions. 

Commenters also opposed the proposed petition process that would allow other future refinery 

operational changes to be approved after review by EPA. The petition process is appropriate 

because a refiner must show that the change would reduce fuel benzene levels. The petition 

process has the added value of being more timely than a rulemaking, which is important because 

of the time constraints surrounding the application for generating early credits and the early 

credit generation period itself. 

For More Information 

For more information, please contact: 

Christine Brunner 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


2000 Traverwood


Ann Arbor, MI 48105


telephone: (734) 214-4287


fax: (734) 214-4051


email: brunner.christine@epa.gov


Regulatory Announcement

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 208

 209

 201

 213

 289

 338

 426

 511

 281

 432

 487

 421

 542

 561

 505

 542

 370

 435

 489

 465

 482

 597

 396

 338

 278

 274

 292

 286

 321

 185

 181

 183

 188

 204

 212

 217

 229

 229

 232

 225

 221

 243

 245

 243

 248

 247

 245

 248

 247

 249

 254

 249

 237

 238

 233

 232

 229

 229

 196

 189

 190

 198

 223

 237

 260

 275

 248

 270

 273

 276

 291

 281

 277

 288

 272

 282

 292

 292

 293

 316

 278

 260

 252

 249

 247

 246

 255

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 5, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,875

 3,789

 3,674

 3,521

 3,416

 3,328

 3,245

 3,202

 3,147

 3,163

 3,194

 3,250

 3,331

 3,407

 3,488

 3,587

 3,669

 3,753

 3,822

 3,877

 3,910

 3,951

 3,981

 3,971

 3,950

 3,923

 3,879

 3,844

 3,822

 277

 271

 262

 252

 244

 238

 232

 229

 225

 226

 228

 232

 238

 243

 249

 256

 262

 268

 273

 277

 279

 282

 284

 284

 282

 280

 277

 275

 273

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
COMMENTS: Values in Acre-Feet

Day

Elev

Feet Storage Change

Federal

Pump

Federal

Gen

Pacheco

Pump ADJ

Federal

Change

Federal

Storage

790,851

1 522.07 1,768,024 -3,394 0 0 459 0 -583 790,268

2 521.76 1,764,269 -3,755 1,221 0 425 0 822 791,090

3 521.57 1,761,970 -2,299 1,226 0 420 0 596 791,686

4 521.42 1,760,155 -1,815 1,198 0 436 0 625 792,311

5 521.18 1,757,252 -2,903 1,218 0 445 0 673 792,984

6 520.16 1,744,934 -12,318 0 0 456 0 -435 792,549

7 519.40 1,735,776 -9,158 0 0 445 1,200 703 793,252

8 518.67 1,726,994 -8,782 0 0 466 1,200 841 794,093

9 518.06 1,719,668 -7,326 0 0 389 1,200 811 794,904

10 517.52 1,713,192 -6,476 0 0 430 2,500 2,176 797,080

11 516.81 1,704,689 -8,503 0 0 450 1,200 583 797,663

12 516.40 1,699,786 -4,903 0 0 461 1,200 737 798,400

13 515.65 1,690,830 -8,956 0 0 462 2,500 2,135 800,535

14 514.85 1,681,294 -9,536 0 0 458 1,000 569 801,104

15 514.57 1,677,961 -3,333 0 0 456 1,000 422 801,526

16 514.35 1,675,343 -2,618 0 0 449 1,000 454 801,980

17 514.28 1,674,511 -832 1,231 0 426 0 554 802,534

18 514.13 1,672,727 -1,784 1,272 0 446 0 676 803,210

19 513.87 1,669,638 -3,089 0 0 446 0 -457 802,753

20 513.58 1,666,194 -3,444 0 0 489 0 -635 802,118

21 513.40 1,664,057 -2,137 0 0 455 0 -697 801,421

22 513.31 1,662,990 -1,067 0 0 448 0 -579 800,842

23 513.07 1,660,143 -2,847 0 0 424 0 -494 800,348

24 512.89 1,658,009 -2,134 0 1,152 426 0 -1,760 798,588

25 512.71 1,655,877 -2,132 0 1,141 436 0 -1,760 796,828

26 513.05 1,659,906 4,029 0 0 442 0 -1,023 795,805

27 513.05 1,659,906 0 0 797 451 0 -970 794,835

28 512.80 1,656,943 -2,963 1,271 3,039 438 0 -2,336 792,499

29 512.79 1,656,824 -119 0 1,349 445 0 -2,088 790,411

30 512.77 1,656,587 -237 0 1,362 580 0 -2,362 788,049

Totals -114,831 8,637 8,840 13,459 14,000 -2,802

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Federal 

Daily Operations

September 2023 Run Date: 1/31/2024
!"	
#$
!

%


&'()*(+,)-*./

0	
(1

2	#&		

		


3


4
.	
2 5

*

	

+66,*(3

#2 

5

*	
	
#



+66,*(

7	8


#

!

	 !"	
#$
!

%


9	!$


%


	

30 	
:!9
 	

3







	




	


		 !"	##	

$%&'$		()#*)"

32733	 %
0
 %
;#+6()#072	#

&		

		
3


4
.	
2 5

*	

+66,*(3

#

2 5

*	
	
#

+66,*(
	<


	 
 3

=
!/#
5


')(1(-

9

&!
#
5


'+1-);

4	 7!		#
5


'+;(,,

7	 !		##
5


'>(6,6

30 	
$!9	

#
5


')>1-6

7	
.!	0	
	
=	#
5


'1-?>>

0	
@
"#==:

(66+(	
.
	#+66

7		

	
#+6(6>

A)61B+;(*)-+6

(,*+,((),

Case 17-12574-BFK Doc 27 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 12:20:54 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
3.32::&90
#%	
	
"0	
		
 

#0	000
"	
	
	
0 	#0
#

	




"00 %	

	0
	



%0
	
#

	

0

((!!1;+ABA-BAB!

3#2C#$9#<#&0	0	 	
	 


%((!!!D1;+A	B#	
"	
0*%

	 
%((!!!(16(A	B#	


0
% 
	

 07		





		


0


    

  	
    
	    0  
	  

  	  	 (,-(;  /&&33  E 4C#


	"#7+6;(1#	
 
	
	


%	
"


= %
0*A?(B#
FF#0
%
"	
F:	



#:	.#7/&==9F#	

	0


	 0=	



:
9
G
#7	
	#:	:(>)#	:	(,!

3#.32$9#<#�		5	%

%


	
	
A+B"	

	

 
0
<

#
0	0	


%0%
#0*%
#
	0



	 	

0

#0

	 	
	((!!!D1;+A	B	
"	
0*%

	((!!!D(16(A	B#
0	

		00
%H

	
0	
		
		
0




	0
 






0
%H



IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

	 302
	%$
	.!/

	
	
$

&$ 


<


IIIIIIIIIIII

Sep 22 2017 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

September 22, 2017

Case 17-12574-BFK Doc 27 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 12:20:54 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
	

0


8
87	 !		#



=
!/#
5


9

&!
#
5


7	 !		##
5


4	 7!		#
5


30 	
$!9	

#
5


7	
.!	0	
	
=	#
5



7	


0	0	

0

<

	

	
	

0	%

	



 	#
	
	#0III(?0IIIII	II %
IIIII#+6()!

8
87	 !		#



=
!/#
5


9

&!
#
5


7	 !		##
5


4	 7!		#
5


30 	
$!9	

#
5


7	
.!	0	
	
=	#
5



7	


	
%


0	
@
"#==:

(66+(	
.
	#+66

7		

	
#+6(6>

	 "	
#$


-(>+4	
"	
!

 

#++6+,

30 	
:!9
 	

166&!4	
0!!-66

	
	#++1(-

	 !"	
#$
!

-(>+4	
"	
!

 

#++6+,

9	!$


(,-(;/&&33E4C


	"#7+6;(1

Case 17-12574-BFK Doc 27 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 12:20:54 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,038

 2,343

 2,134

 1,957

 1,889

 1,707

 1,608

 2,086

 2,847

 3,895

 2,966

 3,120

 2,075

 3,172

 2,766

 2,423

 2,012

 1,838

 1,929

 2,750

 2,358

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,529

 1,137

 1,672

 1,789

 1,983

 363

 341

 323

 336

 319

 336

 336

 340

 360

 373

 401

 398

 430

 444

 468

 385

 417

 301

 331

 374

 363

 0

 0

 0

 0

 380

 336

 345

 356

 372

 644

 642

 631

 608

 613

 562

 641

 692

 761

 1,064

 835

 712

 713

 846

 895

 824

 773

 624

 654

 846

 861

 0

 0

 0

 0

 724

 539

 608

 673

 734

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 9,858

 9,643

 9,201

 8,714

 8,452

 8,166

 8,114

 8,242

 8,465

 9,007

 9,323

 9,514

 9,696

 9,964

 10,215

 10,397

 10,539

 10,555

 10,596

 10,880

 11,100

 10,408

 9,647

 8,583

 7,748

 7,760

 7,586

 7,348

 7,126

 7,036

 704

 689

 657

 622

 604

 583

 580

 589

 605

 643

 666

 680

 693

 712

 730

 743

 753

 754

 757

 777

 793

 743

 689

 613

 553

 554

 542

 525

 509

 503

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General Notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker license and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License No.
Port nameRobert F. Barnes, Sr.
06332
Dallas/Fort WorthStephen W. Marlow
15469
Champlain
 Dated: January 4, 2011. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. 2011-840 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P