alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

19–011 2011

112th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–75 

DESIGNATION OF FUNDING FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A LETTER REGARDING THE DESIGNATION OF OVERSEAS AND 

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM FUNDING 

DECEMBER 30, 2011.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and 

ordered to be printed 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 23, 2011. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with section 5 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, I hereby designate for Overseas 

Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism all funding (including the rescission of funds) so designated by the Congress in 

the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget 

and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended, as outlined in the enclosed list of accounts. 

The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed letter from 

the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 3 here HD75.001
3 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 4 here HD75.002
4 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 5 here HD75.003
5 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARINGInsert offset folio 6 here HD75.004
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code I, Alan M. Schnaid, the Principal Accounting Officer of Westin Realty
Corp., the General Partner of Westin Hotels Limited Partnership (WHLP),
certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of WHLP. By:
    
    /s/ ALAN M. SCHNAID
Alan M. Schnaid
Principal Accounting Officer of
Westin Realty Corp., the General Partner of Westin Hotels Limited
Partnership
 March 11, 2004
§ 24.176 Crushing and fermentation. ( a ) *Natural wine production.* Water may be used to flush equipment during the crushing process or to facilitate fermentation but the density of the juice may not be reduced below 22 degrees Brix. However, if the juice is already less than 23 degrees Brix, the use of water to flush equipment or facilitate fermentation is limited to a juice density reduction of no more than one degree Brix. At the start of fermentation no material may be added except water, sugar, concentrated fruit juice from the same kind of fruit, malo-lactic bacteria, yeast or yeast cultures grown in juice of the same kind of fruit, and yeast foods, sterilizing agents, precipitating agents or other approved fermentation adjuncts. Water may be used to rehydrate yeast to a maximum to two gallons of water for each pound of yeast; however, except for an operation involving the preparation of a yeast culture starter and must mixture for later use in initiating fermentation, the maximum volume increase of the juice after the addition of rehydrated yeast is limited to 0.5 percent. After fermentation natural wines may be blended with each other only if produced from the same kind of fruit.
( b ) *Determination of wine produced.* Upon completion of fermentation or removal from the fermenter, the volume of wine will be accurately determined, recorded and reported on TTB F 5120.17, Report of Bonded Wine Premises Operations, as wine produced. Any wine or juice remaining in fermentation tanks at the end of the reporting period will be recorded and reported on TTB F 5120.17.
[T.D. ATF-312, 56 FR 31078, July 9, 1990, as amended by ATF-338, 58 FR 19064, Apr. 12, 1993]
#### Grace E. Connolly, Appellant-Respondent, v. Rosalie Jones et al., as Sole Surviving Executrices and Trustees under the Will of Mary E. Jones, Deceased, et al., Respondents; T. Everett C. Tuthill et al., Individually and as Members of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Suffolk, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Action by a taxpayer to set aside the cancellation by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Suffolk of certain taxes and tax sales against certain described real property, and for other relief. (1) On appeal by plaintiff from an order dated June 30, 1947, resettling an order dated May 15, 1947, which order granted the motion of defendants Jones to dismiss the complaint as against them, the order is reversed on the law and the motion denied. The second cause of action is sufficient as against these defendants. It is alleged therein that they have title to part of the property involved in that cause of action and, if the action of the Board of Supervisors and the County Treasurer in canceling the taxes and tax sales affecting such property be set aside, that property would be subject to the lien of the unpaid taxes. (2) On appeal by plaintiff from an order dated May 15, 1947, granting a motion by defendant Town of Huntington to dismiss the complaint as against it, the order is reversed on the law and the motion denied. It is alleged that the town has title to all the property involved in the first cause of action and to part of the property involved in the second cause of action. Nullification of the cancellation of taxes and tax sales affecting such property would subject these properties to the lien of the unpaid taxes. Section 51 of the General Municipal Law, contemplating action against officers of a municipality rather than the municipality itself, does not require that the officers of the town be made parties rather than the town itself, since the alleged illegality under attack was not committed by the town or its officers. Plaintiff, is to have one bill of $10 costs and disbursements upon the reversal of orders (1) and (2), and $10 motion costs upon the denial of each of said motions. (3) On appeal by the members of the Board of Supervisors and the County Treasurer of the County of Suffolk from an order dated May 15, 1947, denying their motion to dismiss the complaint as against them, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., conc-ur. [See *post,*p. 1016.]
Wells Fargo Ban

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00251-CV

Gloria J. SANCHEZ,

Appellant

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee

From the County Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-03862

Honorable Marvin Quinney, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, Appellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on August 

4, 2014. On that date, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for a twenty-day extension of 

time to file Appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on August 25, 2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# National Donate Life Month, 2011

 Americans have always been a generous people, willing to give to others in need. In these challenging times, that spirit of service has been abundantly evident and has made a real difference in many lives. As we observe National Donate Life Month, we reflect on an important opportunity to aid others—bestowing the gift of life through organ and tissue donation.

More than 110,000 individuals are now on the national waiting list for organ transplants, and the list continues to grow. Each year, the number of Americans needing life-saving donations has far outstripped the number of available donors. As a result, people lose their lives each day while waiting.

When each donation can touch dozens of lives, it has never been more important to make the decision to be an organ and tissue donor. I encourage all Americans to say yes to donation by giving blood regularly and joining their State-based donor registry. Individuals can register online or through the registration or renewal process for a driver’s license or identification card. When considering organ donation, Americans should consult their family members, doctor, or faith leader about the decision to donate life. To find out more about donation and how you can register in your State, be sure to visit: www.OrganDonor.gov.

Together, we can all make the choice to save and improve the lives of Americans across our country.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 2011 as National Donate Life Month. I call upon health care professionals, volunteers, educators, government agencies, faith-based and community groups, and private organizations to join forces to boost the number of organ and tissue donors throughout our Nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2011-8138

Billing code 3195-W1-P
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear by T.D. ATF-235, 66 FR 5473, Jan. 19, 2001, and T.D. ATF-463 and T.D. ATF-462, 66 FR 42733, 42736, Aug. 15, 2001.

§ 20.21 Forms prescribed. ( a ) The appropriate TTB officer is authorized to prescribe all forms required by this part, including applications, notices, claims, reports, and records. All of the information called for in each form shall be furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in each form shall be furnished as required by this part. The form will be filed in accordance with the instructions for the form.
( b ) Forms prescribed by this part are available for printing through the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.
[T.D. ATF-199, 50 FR 9162, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended by T.D. ATF-249, 52 FR 5961, Feb. 27, 1987; T.D. 372, 61 FR 20724, May 8, 1996; T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5474, Jan. 19, 2001; T.D. ATF-476, 67 FR 17938, Apr. 12, 2002; T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16934, Apr. 4, 2006]
### §478. Foreign obligations or securities

Whoever, within the United States, with intent to defraud, falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any bond, certificate, obligation, or other security of any foreign government, purporting to be or in imitation of any such security issued under the authority of such foreign government, or any treasury note, bill, or promise to pay, lawfully issued by such foreign government and intended to circulate as money, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 707; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §375(a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 341.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §270 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §156, 35 Stat. 1117).

Reference to persons causing, procuring, aiding or assisting was omitted as unnecessary as such persons are made principals by section 2 of this title.

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Changes were also made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–56 substituted "20 years" for "five years".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41128

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODOLFO CANTU-BARAJAS,

DefendantAppellant.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-CR-394-1

----------------------------------------------------------

July 23, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Rodolfo Cantu-Barajas appeals following his jury trial conviction for possession with

intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). Cantu argues that

there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and that the district court erred in denying

his motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor at his trial i mproperly commented on his post-arrest

silence, in violation of Doyle v. Ohio , 426 U.S. 610, 619-20 (1976).

Cantu st ipulat ed t hat he had driven a vehicle containing 18.03 kilograms of cocaine. He

argues only that there was insufficient evidence as to the knowledge element required to convict him.

This court has recognized that a jury may infer a defendant’s guilty knowledge based on the quantity

of drugs, as long as other evidence supports that inference. U nited States v. Garcia-Flores

, 246 F.3d451, 455 (5th Cir. 2001). Considering the evidence in the light mo st favorable to the verdict,

see United States v. Ortega Reyna

, 148 F.3d 540, 543 (5th Cir. 1998), Cantu gave inco nsistent

statements regarding the ownership of the vehicle he was driving and his account of how he came to

be in possession of the vehicle and the cocaine was implausible. Because this type of circumstantial

evidence is sufficient to prove guilty knowledge, United States v. Jones

, 185 F.3d 459, 464 (5th Cir.

1999), cert. denied

, 121 S. Ct. 125 (2000), we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support

Cantu’s conviction.

Cantu’s argument that the district court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial also fails.

Where, as h ere, an objection is interposed before an improper question can be answered, and the

objection is followed by an instruction to the jury to ignore the question, no Doyle violation occurs.

United States v. Carter

, 953 F.2d 1449, 1466 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying Cantu’s motion for a mistrial. S ee United States v. Ramirez

, 963 F.2d

693, 699 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,161.09

 1,161.02

 1,161.01

 1,160.98

 1,160.96

 1,160.94

 1,160.91

 1,160.89

 1,160.88

 1,160.87

 1,160.86

 1,160.84

 1,160.83

 1,160.81

 1,160.80

 1,160.79

 1,160.77

 1,160.76

 1,160.75

 1,160.74

 1,160.73

 1,160.71

 1,160.70

 1,160.69

 1,160.67

 1,160.67

 1,160.65

 1,160.59

 1,160.57

 1,160.56

 1,160.55

 7.45

 7.41

 7.41

 7.39

 7.38

 7.37

 7.36

 7.35

 7.34

 7.34

 7.33

 7.32

 7.32

 7.30

 7.30

 7.29

 7.28

 7.28

 7.27

 7.27

 7.26

 7.25

 7.25

 7.24

 7.23

 7.23

 7.22

 7.19

 7.18

 7.18

 7.17

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.04

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

-0.03

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

CHANGE

2

-5

16

4

4

4

1

2

3

2

2

0

2

0

3

1

-1

1

1

1

1

-1

1

0

-3

2

-2

-13

-2

0

0

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 9

 9

 9

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 4

 5

 10

 7

 5

 4

 4

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .23

 .27

 .58

 .40

 .30

 .23

 .23

 .30

 .30

 .25

 .25

 .24

 .24

 .27

 .27

 .20

 .20

 .18

 .18

 .18

 .16

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .13

 .07

 .15

 .15

 .11

 .13

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/14/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.38 26 73 0 114 6.80 .00

ACRE-FEET -380 52 145 0 226

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 145

 145

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 .00

 7.47
###### Editorial Note on Part 1241

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1241 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1241.20 Aliens ordered excluded.

For the regulations of the Department of Homeland Security pertaining to the detention and deportation of excluded aliens, see 8 CFR 241.20 through 241.25.

[70 FR 675, Jan. 5, 2005]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4981 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4981

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ``Julius L. 
              Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Julius L. 
Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997 
<CASH>                                          12,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,500
<INVENTORY>                                     29,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               454,600
<PP&E>                                       4,917,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,200,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,770,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          657,600
<BONDS>                                      1,156,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,900
<OTHER-SE>                                     528,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,770,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,022,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,624,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                316,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   118,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            197,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   193,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.92
        
                                               


</TABLE>