alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 682.610 Administrative and fiscal requirements for schools that participated in the FFEL Program. ( a ) *General.* Each school shall— ( 1 ) Establish and maintain proper administrative and fiscal procedures and all necessary records as set forth in the regulations in this part and in 34 CFR part 668;
( 2 ) Follow the record retention and examination provisions in this part and in 34 CFR 668.24; and
( 3 ) Submit all reports required by this part and 34 CFR part 668 to the Secretary.
( b ) *Loan record requirements.* In addition to records required by 34 CFR part 668, for each Stafford, SLS, or PLUS loan received by or on behalf of its students, a school must maintain— ( 1 ) A copy of the loan certification or data electronically submitted to the lender, that includes the amount of the loan and the period of enrollment for which the loan was intended;
( 2 ) The cost of attendance, estimated financial assistance, and estimated family contribution used to calculate the loan amount;
( 3 ) For loans delivered to the school by check, the date the school endorsed each loan check, if required;
( 4 ) The date or dates of delivery of the loan proceeds by the school to the student or to the parent borrower;
( 5 ) For loans delivered by electronic funds transfer or master check, a copy of the borrower's required written authorization, if it was not provided in the loan application or MPN, to deliver the initial and subsequent disbursements of each FFEL Program loan; and
( 6 ) Documentation of any MPN confirmation process or processes the school may have used.
( c ) *Enrollment reporting process.* ( 1 ) Upon receipt of an enrollment report from the Secretary, a school must update all information included in the report and return the report to the Secretary— ( i ) In the manner and format prescribed by the Secretary; and
( ii ) Within the timeframe specified by the Secretary.
( 2 ) Unless it expects to submit its next updated enrollment report to the Secretary within the next 60 days, a school must notify the Secretary within 30 days after the date that the school discovers that— ( i ) A loan under title IV of the Act was made to or on behalf of a student who was enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the school, and the student has ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or failed to enroll on at least a half-time basis for the period for which the loan was intended; or
( ii ) A student who is enrolled at the school and who received a loan under title IV of the Act has changed his or her permanent address.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0020) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1078, 1078-1, 1078-2, 1082, 1094)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 9119, Feb. 19, 1993; 61 FR 60493, Nov. 27, 1996; 64 FR 58965, Nov. 1, 1999; 66 FR 34764, June 29, 2001; 78 FR 65822, Nov. 1, 2013]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/Address
Date Reissued019288N
Kairos Logistics LLC, 1447 West 178th Street, Suite 305 Gardena, CA 90248
February 15, 2011.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2011-8199 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
                ( print page 19099)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 192

 185

 182

 177

 177

 167

 162

 162

 169

 170

 164

 162

 170

 168

 159

 160

 158

 165

 170

 162

 162

 162

 159

 158

 159

 154

 154

 151

 149

 152

 151

 157

 156

 152

 152

 152

 154

 152

 152

 157

 156

 151

 149

 147

 150

 145

 146

 149

 152

 158

 153

 151

 150

 147

 151

 146

 145

 145

 145

 145

 145

 147

 167

 162

 166

 165

 162

 157

 156

 159

 161

 163

 159

 156

 157

 155

 150

 149

 152

 157

 160

 159

 156

 156

 154

 155

 153

 150

 149

 148

 147

 147

 149

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH
Dear Mr. Dinardi :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing fro m your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015− 3859 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to
proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 1/ 5 /16 . I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questi ons, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely, /S/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
§ 76.712 Beneficiary protections: Written notice. ( a ) An organization providing social services to beneficiaries under a Department program supported by direct Federal financial assistance must give written notice to a beneficiary or prospective beneficiary of certain protections. Such notice must be given in the manner and form prescribed by the Department. This notice must state that— ( 1 ) The organization may not discriminate against a beneficiary or prospective beneficiary on the basis of religion, a religious belief, a refusal to hold a religious belief, or a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice;
( 2 ) The organization may not require a beneficiary or prospective beneficiary to attend or participate in any explicitly religious activities that are offered by the organization, and any participation by a beneficiary in such activities must be purely voluntary;
( 3 ) The organization must separate in time or location any privately funded explicitly religious activities from activities supported by direct Federal financial assistance; and
( 4 ) A beneficiary or prospective beneficiary may report an organization's violation of these protections, including any denials of services or benefits by an organization, by contacting or filing a written complaint with the Department.
( b ) The written notice described in paragraph (a) of this section must be given to a prospective beneficiary prior to the time they enroll in the program or receive services from the program. When the nature of the service provided or exigent circumstances make it impracticable to provide such written notice in advance of the actual service, an organization must provide the notice at the earliest available opportunity.
( c ) The Department may determine that the notice described in paragraph (a) of this section must inform each beneficiary or prospective beneficiary of the option to seek information from the Department, or a State agency or other entity administering the applicable program, as to whether there are any other federally funded organizations in their area that provide the services available under the applicable program.
( d ) The notice that an organization uses to notify beneficiaries or prospective beneficiaries of the rights under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section must include language substantially similar to that in appendix C to 34 CFR part 75.
[89 FR 15704, Mar. 4, 2024]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 415.65

 415.92

 416.06

 415.88

 415.80

 415.60

 415.69

 416.84

 417.20

 417.32

 417.35

 417.41

 417.69

 418.59

 419.11

 419.32

 419.28

 419.19

 419.05

 419.03

 418.95

 419.03

 418.92

 418.88

 418.81

 418.65

 418.54

 418.49

 418.37

 418.17

 417.92

 493.1

 495.2

 496.3

 494.9

 494.3

 492.7

 493.4

 502.5

 505.4

 506.3

 506.6

 507.0

 509.3

 516.5

 520.7

 522.4

 522.1

 521.4

 520.2

 520.1

 519.4

 520.1

 519.2

 518.9

 518.3

 517.0

 516.1

 515.7

 514.7

 513.1

 511.1

STORAGE

-0.3

+2.1

+1.1

-1.4

-0.6

-1.6

+0.7

+9.1

+2.9

+1.0

+0.2

+0.5

+2.2

+7.2

+4.2

+1.7

-0.3

-0.7

-1.1

-0.2

-0.6

+0.6

-0.9

-0.3

-0.6

-1.3

-0.9

-0.4

-1.0

-1.6

-2.0

CHANGE

2,262

3,496

2,918

1,883

2,042

1,879

2,729

7,000

4,101

2,953

2,413

2,726

3,560

6,257

4,417

3,011

2,744

2,141

2,201

2,040

2,372

2,451

2,046

2,160

2,108

1,924

1,936

2,233

1,990

1,662

1,497

INFLOW

 2,322

 2,342

 2,285

 2,538

 2,294

 2,611

 2,309

 2,338

 2,572

 2,389

 2,227

 2,435

 2,361

 2,517

 2,205

 2,064

 2,825

 2,449

 2,711

 2,055

 2,627

 2,053

 2,432

 2,255

 2,322

 2,492

 2,303

 2,354

 2,398

 2,407

 2,442

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 98

 85

 76

 60

 60

 60

 64

 77

 77

 75

 65

 48

 69

 81

 74

 73

 69

 62

 60

 59

 64

 71

 63

 60

 63

 65

 70

 72

 70

 62

 62

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 0

 0

 0

 5

 5

 0

 0

 0

 5

 16

 11

 14

 0

 5

 8

 8

 0

 0

 8

 8

 19

 11

 11

 11

 8

 8

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

INCHES

 1.39

 .82

 .01

 .32

 .01

 .13

 .80

 .40

 .00

 .06

 .21

 .01

 .20

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .48

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +17.7 85,152 73,934 0 0 2,114 166 .62 4.96

ACRE-FEET +17,700 168,899 146,648 0 0 4,193 329

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

 493.4

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 146,648

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 4,193

TOTAL 150,841

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 6.13

OUTLET 0 4.96

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 5.68
#### In the Matter of John D. Campbell, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

All concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41472

Summary Calendar

 

STARLEN MCNAIRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL WILSON, Senior Warden, Michael Unit; 

HOLLAND R. PICKLE, Captain, Michael Unit;

ADONIA JEAN MCCALEY, Nurse, Michael Unit; 

JAMES A SNOW, Correctional Officer III, 

Michael Unit; LEVIE PRIM, Correctional Officer,

Michael Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CV-267

- - - - - - - - - -

May 11, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Starlen McNairy, Texas prisoner # 517613, appeals the

magistrate judge’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 action for failing to exhaust administrative remedies. He

argues that, although he had not exhausted his administrative

remedies before filing suit, he exhausted such remedies while his

suit was pending. McNairy’s notice of appeal was filed more than
No. 97-41472

-2-

30 days after the final judgment and was thus untimely. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(1). However, the notice of appeal was timely

filed following the denial of McNairy’s postjudgment motion,

which the magistrate judge correctly construed as a Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b) motion. See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, 784

F.2d 665, 667 (5th Cir. 1986)(en banc). We review the denial of

the Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. Carimi v. Royal

Caribbean Line, Inc., 959 F.2d 1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992).

McNairy filed his suit after the effective date of the

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) (April 26, 1996), and his

case is thus governed by the provisions therein. See Underwood

v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 293 (5th Cir. 1998). The PLRA amended

42 U.S.C. § 1997e to require that a prisoner must exhaust his

administrative remedies before filing a § 1983 action. See 

§ 1997e(a). McNairy did not exhaust administrative remedies

before filing suit, and his exhaustion of administrative remedies

during the pendency of his suit does not satisfy the requirements

of § 1997e(a). See Underwood, 151 F.3d at 296. The magistrate

judge did not abuse her discretion in denying McNairy’s

postjudgment motion challenging the magistrate judge’s dismissal

of his suit for failing to exhaust administrative remedies. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Alexander Dumas, Jr., Respondent, v. Auburndale Realty Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### Montreal Engineering Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Alfred H. Post, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 7 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 8 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 9 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 10 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 11 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 12 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 13 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 14 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 15 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 16 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 17 of 18

Case 20-34576-KLP    Doc 26    Filed 12/02/20    Entered 12/02/20 17:09:01    Desc MainDocument      Page 18 of 18
#### Giovanni Banchetti, as Administrator, etc., of Antonio Di Litta, Deceased, Appellant, v. Gorsline & Swan Construction Company, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
### §3168. Planning process

(a) Within sixty days after July 1, 1975, each United States district court shall convene a planning group consisting at minimum of the Chief Judge, a United States magistrate judge, if any designated by the Chief Judge, the United States Attorney, the Clerk of the district court, the Federal Public Defender, if any, two private attorneys, one with substantial experience in the defense of criminal cases in the district and one with substantial experience in civil litigation in the district, the Chief United States Probation Officer for the district, and a person skilled in criminal justice research who shall act as reporter for the group. The group shall advise the district court with respect to the formulation of all district plans and shall submit its recommendations to the district court for each of the district plans required by section 3165. The group shall be responsible for the initial formulation of all district plans and of the reports required by this chapter and in aid thereof, it shall be entitled to the planning funds specified in section 3171.

(b) The planning group shall address itself to the need for reforms in the criminal justice system, including but not limited to changes in the grand jury system, the finality of criminal judgments, habeas corpus and collateral attacks, pretrial diversion, pretrial detention, excessive reach of Federal criminal law, simplification and improvement of pretrial and sentencing procedures, and appellate delay.

(c) Members of the planning group with the exception of the reporter shall receive no additional compensation for their services, but shall be reimbursed for travel, subsistence and other necessary expenses incurred by them in carrying out the duties of the advisory group in accordance with the provisions of title 5, United States Code, chapter 57. The reporter shall be compensated in accordance with section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, and notwithstanding other provisions of law he may be employed for any period of time during which his services are needed.

(Added Pub. L. 93–619, title I, §101, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2083; amended Pub. L. 96–43, §9(d), Aug. 2, 1979, 93 Stat. 330; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–43 substituted "two private attorneys, one with substantial experience in the defense of criminal cases in the district and one with substantial experience in civil litigation in the district" for "a private attorney experienced in the defense of criminal cases in the district".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,483

 5,536

 5,315

 5,802

 6,325

 6,489

 6,635

 6,834

 7,202

 7,728

 7,733

 7,254

 6,918

 6,943

 7,608

 7,931

 8,500

 8,782

 8,958

 9,687

 10,357

 10,374

 9,886

 9,834

 8,684

 7,857

 7,390

 7,062

 7,618

 4,674

 600

 692

 724

 812

 832

 832

 782

 793

 671

 962

 1,130

 1,126

 1,147

 1,141

 840

 1,146

 1,556

 2,391

 2,245

 2,152

 2,120

 2,774

 2,466

 1,730

 1,288

 1,151

 836

 756

 1,125

 615

 3,056

 3,064

 2,902

 3,047

 3,182

 3,226

 3,265

 2,751

 3,507

 4,247

 4,545

 4,434

 4,277

 4,201

 4,623

 5,312

 5,679

 5,438

 5,544

 5,753

 6,142

 6,405

 5,971

 5,500

 4,848

 4,180

 3,912

 3,950

 4,669

 2,375

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 39,397

 40,064

 40,353

 40,447

 40,810

 41,328

 42,051

 42,434

 43,246

 44,411

 45,604

 47,018

 48,446

 49,704

 51,271

 53,519

 56,296

 58,687

 61,049

 63,576

 66,453

 70,107

 72,571

 73,824

 74,127

 73,873

 73,508

 73,257

 73,303

 70,366

 2,814

 2,862

 2,882

 2,889

 2,915

 2,952

 3,004

 3,031

 3,089

 3,172

 3,257

 3,358

 3,460

 3,550

 3,662

 3,823

 4,021

 4,192

 4,361

 4,541

 4,747

 5,008

 5,184

 5,273

 5,295

 5,277

 5,251

 5,233

 5,236

 5,026

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 76.657 Separate classes prohibited. A subgrantee may not use program funds for classes that are organized separately on the basis of school enrollment or religion of the students if: ( a ) The classes are at the same site; and
( b ) The classes include students enrolled in public schools and students enrolled in private schools.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)