alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40979

Summary Calendar

WILLIAM EDWARDS,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JODY R. UPTON, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CV-448

Before KING, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

William Edwards, federal prisoner # 00212-748, appeals the district court’s

denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus he filed challenging his

conviction and 245-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute narcotics. See

United States v. Hoover, 246 F.3d 1054, 1057 (7th Cir. 2001). He maintains that

the district court erred in determining that he was not entitled to raise his

challenge to the introduction of evidence at his trial and sentencing in a 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 7, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40979 Document: 00511500472 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2011
No. 10-40979

As a general rule, a federal prisoner who seeks to collaterally challenge the

legality of his conviction or sentence must file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.

Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005). Such claims may

be raised in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255(e) only if the

prisoner shows that the § 2255 remedy is “inadequate or ineffective to test the

legality of his detention.” § 2255(e). Edwards has not made such a showing, as

he has not established that his claims are based on a retroactively applicable

Supreme Court decision establishing that he was convicted of a nonexistent

offense. Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001).

Although Edwards maintains that the district court lacked the authority to

consider his § 2241 petition as a proceeding arising under § 2255, he is incorrect.

See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th Cir. 2000).

Edwards contends that he may proceed under § 2241 because he was

“actually innocent” of a firearm enhancement used to increase his sentence,

which was based on evidence that a state court had found to be illegally

obtained. He has not established that his alleged actual innocence of his

sentence provides a “gateway” through which the district court is authorized to

review his claims. See Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 315 (1995); Kinder v. Purdy,

222 F.3d 209, 213-14 (5th Cir. 2000). Additionally, Edwards has not shown that

the district court should hear his claims because the requirements of § 2255’s

savings clause violate the Suspension Clause of the United States Constitution.

See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tex., 305 F.3d 343, 346-47 (5th Cir.

2002). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-40979 Document: 00511500472 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2011
3/26/2020 Ketchikan Area Cabins

https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo17655/ktn_map.html 1/2

List of Cabins | Cabin Information | Tongass Home
3/26/2020 Ketchikan Area Cabins

https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo17655/ktn_map.html 2/2
#### First Lynbrook Corporation, Plaintiff, and Anna G. Stucker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Emanuel Lurio, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

No opinion. Cars-well, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5458 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To modify the boundary of the Rocky Mountain National Park, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rocky Mountain National Park 
Boundary Modification Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``Rocky 
        Mountain National Park Proposed Boundary Revision'', numbered 
        121/154,327, and dated June 2019.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 40 acres of non-Federal land depicted as ``TR 
        05-133'' on the map.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    (a) Land Acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation, the 
non-Federal land for inclusion in the Rocky Mountain National Park.
    (b) Boundary Modification.--On acquisition of the non-Federal land 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) modify the boundary of the Rocky Mountain National Park 
        to include the acquisition; and
            (2) administer the acquired land as part of the Rocky 
        Mountain National Park, in accordance with applicable laws.
    (c) Availability of Map.--The map shall be on file and available 
for public inspection in appropriate offices of the National Park 
Service.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To modify the boundary of the Rocky Mountain National Park, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 529

 546

 550

 585

 575

 602

 645

 659

 684

 693

 670

 714

 696

 763

 802

 802

 698

 673

 805

 670

 755

 702

 772

 785

 813

 769

 694

 714

 681

 780

 429

 449

 485

 531

 542

 556

 575

 546

 553

 598

 599

 610

 610

 626

 634

 678

 615

 606

 607

 574

 606

 562

 573

 571

 580

 585

 575

 533

 539

 612

 482

 488

 516

 562

 558

 579

 607

 600

 591

 642

 618

 667

 636

 709

 689

 739

 647

 627

 670

 615

 673

 616

 643

 643

 670

 666

 623

 604

 623

 687

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 314

 318

 335

 363

 361

 374

 391

 387

 381

 413

 398

 428

 409

 454

 442

 473

 416

 403

 430

 396

 432

 397

 413

 413

 430

 428

 401

 389

 401

 441

TOTAL 18,690

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7659
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DWIGHT JONES, a/k/a Shakey, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Ric hard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-162-R, CA-95-801) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwight Jones, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones , Nos. CR-92-162-R; CA-95-801 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Lapin, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

		 

March 29, 2005 

/s/ Steven B. Lapin *

Steven B. Lapin

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



[LETTERHEAD]



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer



I, Jay M. Gratz, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ryerson Tull, Inc. (the Company), state and certify that this Form
10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Jay M. Gratz                                                                                         
|Jay M. Gratz Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) March 21, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 419.21

 418.78

 418.43

 418.06

 417.63

 417.22

 416.91

 416.57

 416.47

 416.00

 415.59

 415.10

 414.67

 414.29

 413.77

 413.45

 413.01

 412.58

 412.14

 411.75

 411.27

 410.70

 410.17

 409.76

 409.27

 408.85

 408.44

 408.17

 407.88

 407.54

 407.21

 521.5

 518.1

 515.2

 512.2

 508.8

 505.5

 503.0

 500.3

 499.5

 495.8

 492.6

 488.8

 485.4

 482.4

 478.4

 476.0

 472.6

 469.3

 465.9

 463.0

 459.3

 455.1

 451.1

 448.0

 444.4

 441.3

 438.3

 436.3

 434.2

 431.8

 429.4

STORAGE

-3.2

-3.5

-2.8

-3.0

-3.4

-3.3

-2.5

-2.7

-0.8

-3.7

-3.2

-3.8

-3.4

-3.0

-4.0

-2.5

-3.4

-3.3

-3.4

-3.0

-3.6

-4.3

-4.0

-3.0

-3.6

-3.1

-3.0

-2.0

-2.1

-2.5

-2.4

CHANGE

1,391

1,274

1,568

1,410

1,333

1,299

1,302

1,324

1,863

1,303

1,251

1,100

1,384

1,256

1,121

1,495

1,329

1,262

1,502

1,356

1,007

917

994

1,333

1,117

1,653

1,327

1,055

1,444

1,208

1,315

INFLOW

 2,700

 2,730

 2,690

 2,612

 2,766

 2,646

 2,265

 2,416

 1,984

 2,906

 2,596

 2,762

 2,791

 2,461

 2,861

 2,479

 2,776

 2,651

 2,917

 2,553

 2,550

 2,817

 2,733

 2,602

 2,668

 2,953

 2,582

 1,785

 2,251

 2,184

 2,249

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 228

 229

 231

 237

 237

 230

 226

 216

 220

 220

 222

 224

 233

 231

 223

 223

 226

 230

 240

 235

 225

 217

 217

 216

 216

 219

 214

 211

 210

 211

 213

PUMPING

 66

 74

 73

 68

 67

 78

 59

 51

 59

 56

 56

 55

 50

 55

 68

 36

 36

 36

 38

 59

 61

 43

 43

 52

 62

 42

 44

 56

 49

 54

 58

C.F.S.

 .24

 .27

 .27

 .25

 .25

 .29

 .22

 .19

 .22

 .21

 .21

 .21

 .19

 .21

 .26

 .14

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .23

 .24

 .17

 .17

 .21

 .25

 .17

 .18

 .23

 .20

 .22

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 20, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS -95.5 40,493 79,936 0 0 6,930 1,704 6.57 .00

ACRE-FEET -95,500 80,318 158,553 0 0 13,746 3,380

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 158,553

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 13,746

TOTAL 172,299

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE = .00

 524.7

OUTLET 0 .00

Table 11
###### Editorial Note on Part 21

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by T.D. ATF-435, 66 FR 5475, Jan. 19, 2001.

Nomenclature changes to part 21 appear by 81 T.D. TTB-140, 81 FR Aug. 30, 2016.

#### § 21.66 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 112

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 100 to 135, revised as of July 1, 2010, on page 71, in Appendix E to Part 112, the second section 5.1 is removed.

[FR Doc. 2011-8328 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1936

_____________________________
M URRAY H ILTON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

. September 14, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Murray Hilton, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,974

 7,160

 4,698

 2,433

 1,514

 1,228

 536

 954

 936

 1,520

 2,225

 2,719

 3,021

 2,962

 3,624

 3,579

 3,252

 4,767

 2,964

 1,727

 678

 420

 335

 225

 254

 521

 502

 383

 324

 244

 186

 421

 1,096

 373

 316

 303

 322

 287

 231

 245

 233

 243

 282

 349

 362

 372

 444

 349

 485

 512

 284

 285

 251

 186

 153

 118

 101

 107

 92

 97

 102

 92

 4,252

 3,072

 1,589

 852

 572

 478

 354

 332

 333

 403

 471

 681

 778

 922

 1,109

 1,203

 1,193

 1,849

 1,044

 590

 382

 299

 223

 181

 165

 216

 233

 218

 167

 157

 131

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 31,264

 32,535

 32,204

 31,039

 29,280

 27,382

 25,363

 23,230

 21,310

 20,193

 19,270

 18,294

 16,525

 15,089

 11,946

 10,077

 9,681

 10,678

 11,150

 11,262

 11,290

 11,257

 11,147

 10,925

 10,619

 10,154

 9,609

 8,905

 7,963

 6,917

 5,855

 2,233

 2,324

 2,300

 2,217

 2,091

 1,956

 1,812

 1,659

 1,522

 1,442

 1,376

 1,307

 1,180

 1,078

 853

 720

 692

 763

 796

 804

 806

 804

 796

 780

 759

 725

 686

 636

 569

 494

 418

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
December 15, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRUMAINE MARKE WILLIAMS, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00262-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to delete 

the assessment of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $7,604.48.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 434.74

 434.76

 434.82

 434.91

 434.91

 435.05

 435.14

 435.46

 435.57

 435.68

 435.74

 435.91

 436.19

 436.28

 436.22

 436.09

 436.13

 436.26

 436.39

 436.43

 436.54

 436.43

 436.32

 436.13

 435.96

 435.89

 435.72

 435.53

 435.32

 435.17

 656.8

 656.9

 657.5

 658.3

 658.3

 659.6

 660.5

 663.4

 664.5

 665.5

 666.1

 667.6

 670.3

 671.1

 670.5

 669.3

 669.7

 670.9

 672.1

 672.5

 673.5

 672.5

 671.5

 669.7

 668.1

 667.4

 665.9

 664.1

 662.1

 660.7

STORAGE

+0.8

+0.2

+0.6

+0.8

+0.0

+1.3

+0.8

+3.0

+1.0

+1.0

+0.6

+1.6

+2.6

+0.8

-0.6

-1.2

+0.4

+1.2

+1.2

+0.4

+1.0

-1.0

-1.0

-1.8

-1.6

-0.7

-1.6

-1.8

-2.0

-1.4

CHANGE

2,007

2,057

1,743

1,663

1,636

2,190

2,268

3,865

2,352

1,831

2,172

2,547

3,353

2,776

1,757

1,367

1,516

2,624

2,443

2,611

2,142

1,300

1,139

823

994

1,516

1,026

769

864

772

INFLOW

 1,300

 1,794

 1,290

 1,051

 1,402

 1,290

 1,581

 2,065

 1,532

 1,010

 1,584

 1,442

 1,734

 2,051

 1,738

 1,685

 1,021

 1,696

 1,509

 2,147

 1,330

 1,586

 1,438

 1,503

 1,552

 1,591

 1,576

 1,428

 1,643

 1,265

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 205

 170

 173

 193

 203

 206

 219

 225

 230

 231

 233

 232

 224

 225

 227

 221

 231

 238

 245

 225

 233

 203

 190

 187

 213

 217

 211

 195

 204

 208

PUMPING

 83

 0

 0

 0

 31

 40

 46

 74

 74

 74

 74

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 50

 59

 31

 31

 31

 31

 37

 37

 37

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .13

 .15

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .24

 .16

 .19

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .12

 .12

 .12

 .01

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .38

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 FOLSOM LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. PLANT

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

 RIVER 

TOTALS +4.6 56,123 45,834 0 0 6,417 1,446 4.66 .38

ACRE-FEET +4,600 111,320 90,912 0 0 12,728 2,868

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 90,912

SPILL

PUMPING PLANT

 0

 12,728

TOTAL 103,640

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = .38

 655.9

OUTLET 0 .38

Table 11
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re:

JOHN KIRIAKOU,

 Debtor.

Case No. 20-10934-KHK

 Chapter 7

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE A COMPLAINT OBJECTING TO DISCHARGE OF THE DEBTOR

This matter came before the court on the motion of the Acting United States Trustee for 

Region 4 for an order extending the time to file a complaint objecting to the discharge of the 

debtor, John Kiriakou, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727.

It appearing to the court that the requested relief should be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERD that:

1. The United States Trustee’s motion to extend time to file a complaint objecting to 

the discharge of the Debtor is hereby GRANTED; and the time within which the United States 

Trustee must file a complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) is extended to a date that is 120 

days after entry of this Order. 

The clerk shall serve by first class mail a copy of this order, or give electronic notice of

the entry of this order on the docket, to the parties listed below.

Date: _____________ ______________________________________

 Klinette H. Kindred

 U. S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket: ____________________

Case 20-10934-KHK Doc 86-1 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 08/28/20 13:20:42 Desc

Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

I ASK FOR THIS:

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III

ACTING U. S. TRUSTEE FOR REGION 4

By: /s/ Kristen S. Eustis

Kristen S. Eustis

VA Bar No. 89729

Trial Attorney

Office of United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, VA 22314

(703) 557-7227

Kristen.S.Eustis@usdoj.gov

Copies To:

John Kiriakou

1904 N. Daniel St.

Arlington, VA 22201

Debtor

Ashvin Pandurangi

Vivona Pandurangi, PLC

211 Park Ave.

Falls Church, VA 22046

Email: notices@vpbklaw.com

Counsel for Debtor

Donald F. King

1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400

Reston, VA 20190

Email: Kingtrustee@ofplaw.com

Chapter 7 Trustee

Bradley D. Jones

Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.

1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400

Reston, VA 20190

Email: Brad.Jones@ofplaw.com

Counsel to the Chapter 7 Trustee

Kristen S. Eustis

Office of United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, VA 22314

Email: Kristen.S.Eustis@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Acting U. S. Trustee

Case 20-10934-KHK Doc 86-1 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 08/28/20 13:20:42 Desc

Proposed Order Page 2 of 2