alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4361. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Finance and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Covered merchandise

The term "covered merchandise" means merchandise that is subject to—

(A) a countervailing duty order issued under section 706 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671e); or

(B) an antidumping duty order issued under section 736 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673e).

#### (3) Eligible small business

#### (A) In general

The term "eligible small business" means any business concern that, in the judgment of the Commissioner, due to its small size, has neither adequate internal resources nor financial ability to obtain qualified outside assistance in preparing and submitting for consideration allegations of evasion.

#### (B) Nonreviewability

Any agency decision regarding whether a business concern is an eligible small business for purposes of section 4371(b)(4)(E) of this title is not reviewable by any other agency or by any court.

#### (4) Enter; entry

The terms "enter" and "entry" refer to the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of merchandise in the customs territory of the United States.

#### (5) Evade; evasion

The terms "evade" and "evasion" refer to entering covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of any document or electronically transmitted data or information, written or oral statement, or act that is material and false, or any omission that is material, and that results in any cash deposit or other security or any amount of applicable antidumping or countervailing duties being reduced or not being applied with respect to the merchandise.

#### (6) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (7) Trade remedy laws

The term "trade remedy laws" means title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, §402, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 155.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 114–125, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 155, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see section 401 of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a Short Title note under section 4301 of this title and Tables.

The Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in par. (7), is act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, 46 Stat. 590. Title VII of the Act is classified generally to subtitle IV (§1671 et seq.) of chapter 4 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1654 of this title and Tables.
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 285TH JUDICIA L DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETI NGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on June 22, 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your j udgment between

Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda, Appellant

V.

Susser Petroleum Operating Company, LLC, Appellee

No. 04

- 16

- 00146

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2016

- CI

- 01790

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## On April 20, 2016, the court issued its opinion and judgment in this

a ppeal. Although a motion for en banc rehearing is pending, the panel, on its own motion, withdraws its opinion and judgment of April 20, 2016 and substitutes this opinion and order instead.

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION.

We ORDER that appellants, Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda, pay all costs, if any, incurred as a result of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on August 31, 2016

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 16

- 00146

- CV

Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda

v.

Susser Petroleum Operating Company, LLC

(NO. 2016

- CI

- 01790 IN 285 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUN TY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE MOTION FEE COPIES REPORTER'S RECORD CLERK'S RECORD MOTION FEE SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51
FEE STATEWIDE EFILING FE E INDIGENT FILING MOTION FEE $ 10.00 $15.00 $30.00 $110.00 $138.00

$10.00

$50.00 $30.00 $25.00 $100.00

$10.00 E

- PAID
E

- PAID
PAID
PAID
PAID
E

- PAID

E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID N/A
HARI KALAKONDA HARI KALAKONDA PLAINTIFFS HARI P KALAKONDA AUDREY VICKNAIR

HARI KALAKONDA
HARI KALAK ONDA HARI KALAKONDA HARI KALAKONDA HARI KALAKONDA

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE

, CLERK OF THE F OURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and s tyled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this August 31, 2016

.

KEITH E . HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
#### § 609.1 What is the Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Program?

The Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Program provides grants to the institutions listed in § 609.2 to assist these institutions in establishing and strengthening their physical plants, development offices, endowment funds, academic resources and student services so that they may continue to participate in fulfilling the goal of equality of educational opportunity in graduate education.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1060 and 1063b)
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

May-07

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-May-07 0 12 12 2 4 0 4 2 531 849 1,380 1,054 1,684 2,738 0.0 

2-May-07 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 872 560 1,432 1,730 1,110 2,840 0.0 3-May-07 0 0 0 1 4 0 4 1 677 848 1,525 1,342 1,682 3,024 0.0 4-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 676 846 1,522 1,340 1,679 3,019 0.0 5-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 675 844 1,519 1,339 1,674 3,013 0.0 6-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 673 855 1,528 1,335 1,695 3,030 0.0 7-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 679 693 1,372 1,347 1,375 2,722 0.0 8-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 578 852 1,429 1,146 1,689 2,835 0.0 9-May-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 652 853 1,504 1,293 1,691 2,984 0.0 

10-May-07 0 12 12 2 0 0 0 1 532 853 1,385 1,056 1,691 2,747 0.0 11-May-07 0 48 48 5 0 0 0 1 538 849 1,387 1,067 1,684 2,751 0.0 12-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 530 849 1,379 1,052 1,683 2,735 0.0 13-May-07 0 12 12 6 0 0 0 1 786 850 1,637 1,560 1,686 3,246 0.0 14-May-07 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 661 844 1,505 1,312 1,674 2,986 0.0 

15-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 521 853 1,374 1,034 1,692 2,726 0.0 

16-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 12 12 1 302 852 1,154 600 1,689 2,289 0.0 

17-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 275 855 1,130 545 1,696 2,241 0.0 

18-May-07 0 0 0 5 4 0 4 1 317 852 1,169 629 1,689 2,318 0.0 

19-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 273 855 1,127 541 1,695 2,236 0.0 

20-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 272 850 1,122 540 1,686 2,226 0.0 

21-May-07 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 271 856 1,127 538 1,698 2,236 0.0 

22-May-07 0 0 0 5 4 0 4 1 273 852 1,125 541 1,690 2,231 0.0 

23-May-07 0 24 24 7 2 24 26 3 798 848 1,646 1,583 1,682 3,265 0.0 24-May-07 0 24 24 8 0 0 0 3 359 849 1,208 713 1,683 2,396 0.0 25-May-07 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 3 358 851 1,209 710 1,688 2,398 2.8 

26-May-07 22 24 46 8 0 12 12 4 358 845 1,203 711 1,676 2,387 30.9 27-May-07 24 24 48 10 0 48 48 8 260 854 1,114 516 1,693 2,209 46.5 28-May-07 20 0 20 12 0 24 24 9 321 853 1,173 636 1,691 2,327 31.4 

29-May-07 58 12 70 17 0 0 0 9 315 853 1,167 624 1,691 2,315 92.9 30-May-07 46 24 70 22 0 12 12 9 315 854 1,169 624 1,694 2,318 73.7 31-May-07 40 0 40 25 0 0 0 9 261 856 1,116 517 1,697 2,214 77.4 

Total 212 216 428 XXXX 18 132 150 XXXX 14,911 25,927 40,838 29,575 51,427 81,002 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for May = 30,500

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta 

Daily D

Tracy Combined SWP
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.28

 1,198.27

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.26

 1,198.25

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.22

 1,198.21

 1,198.20

 1,198.19

 1,198.19

 1,198.18

 1,198.17

 1,198.17

 1,198.17

 1,198.16

 1,198.14

 1,198.12

 48.39

 48.39

 48.39

 48.37

 48.36

 48.36

 48.36

 48.34

 48.32

 48.32

 48.30

 48.30

 48.30

 48.32

 48.32

 48.32

 48.30

 48.30

 48.28

 48.27

 48.25

 48.23

 48.23

 48.21

 48.20

 48.20

 48.20

 48.18

 48.14

 48.11

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

CHANGE

35

53

57

45

38

47

48

39

26

37

19

30

28

40

29

36

30

39

27

18

16

16

22

13

12

22

19

6

7

17

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 38

 33

 33

 33

 29

 24

 24

 20

 20

 20

 24

 24

 24

 20

 20

 16

 12

 8

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 13

 13

OUTLET

 0

 9

 13

 15

 13

 13

 14

 18

 10

 12

 7

 9

 7

 6

 4

 11

 18

 18

 19

 14

 16

 21

 18

 21

 20

 21

 18

 14

 12

 22

C.F.S.

 .00

 .16

 .23

 .27

 .23

 .22

 .24

 .31

 .17

 .21

 .12

 .15

 .12

 .10

 .07

 .20

 .31

 .32

 .34

 .25

 .28

 .37

 .32

 .36

 .35

 .36

 .32

 .25

 .21

 .38

INCHES

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2006 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/15/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.34 871 54 557 413 7.22 .20

ACRE-FEET -340 1,728 107 1,105 819

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,105

OUTLET

TOTAL

 107

 1,212

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .20

JULY 1, 2005 23.74

 48.41
§ 19.189 Identification of structures, areas, apparatus, and equipment. ( a ) *Buildings.* The proprietor must mark each building at a distilled spirits plant where spirits, denatured spirits, articles, wine, or distilling or fermenting materials are kept with a distinguishing number or letter.
( b ) *Tanks.* The proprietor must mark each tank or receptacle for spirits, denatured spirits, or wine to show a unique serial number and capacity.
( c ) *Stills.* The proprietor must number and mark to show the use of each still, fermenter, cooker, and yeast tank.
( d ) *Other major equipment.* The proprietor must identify the use of all other major equipment used for processing or containing spirits, denatured spirits, wine, distilling or fermenting material, and all other tanks, unless the intended purpose is readily apparent.
(26 U.S.C. 5178)
Day

Elev

Feet Storage Change

Federal

Pump

Federal

Gen

Pacheco

Pump ADJ

Federal

Change

Federal

Storage

890,627

1 492.77 1,425,515 -4,279 0 4,299 197 0 -4,508 886,119

2 492.08 1,417,755 -7,760 0 4,377 217 0 -4,614 881,505

3 491.06 1,406,310 -11,445 0 7,577 196 0 -7,637 873,868

4 490.28 1,397,579 -8,731 0 7,633 170 0 -7,575 866,293

5 489.64 1,390,429 -7,150 0 7,265 164 0 -7,524 858,769

6 489.28 1,386,413 -4,016 0 5,839 208 0 -5,942 852,827

7 488.70 1,379,950 -6,463 0 5,825 216 0 -6,042 846,785

8 487.90 1,371,052 -8,898 0 3,401 213 0 -3,803 842,982

9 487.19 1,363,172 -7,880 0 5,824 234 0 -5,991 836,991

10 486.37 1,354,090 -9,082 0 3,889 257 0 -4,093 832,898

11 485.54 1,344,918 -9,172 0 3,940 241 0 -4,161 828,737

12 484.91 1,337,970 -6,948 0 3,936 254 0 -4,038 824,699

13 484.31 1,331,364 -6,606 0 3,620 286 0 -3,920 820,779

Totals -98,430 0 67,425 2,853 0 -69,848

COMMENTS: Values in Acre-Feet

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Federal Daily Operations 

Run Date: 5/14/2024

May 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          10,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                      2,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,392
<PP&E>                                         314,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,698
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,244
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOHN STEVEN SIM ON, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C ITY OF PHOENIX; e t a l., De fe nda

nts, And B OR QUEZ, C ity

of Phoe nix Polic e Offic e r, B a dge # 8790; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-15308 D.C . No. 2:09-c v-00701-JAT M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Jam e s A. Te ilborg, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED DEC 5 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).John Ste ve n Sim on a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dism issing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging e xc e ssive forc e . W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w for an a buse of disc re tion a dism issa l a s a

sa nc tion, In reEx

x on Valde

z , 102 F.3d 429, 432 (9th C ir. 1996), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing Simon’ s a c tion a s a sa nc tion a fte r Sim o n fa ile d to re spond time ly or prope rly to de fe nda

nts’ disc ove ry re que st, de spite be ing wa rne d tha t fa ilure to do so c ould re sult in dism issa l of his a c tion. Se eid. at 433 (se tting forth fa c tors for a distric t c ourt to c onside r in de te rm ining whe the r to dismiss a s a sa nc tion, a nd noting tha

t dismissa l is a uthoriz e d “ whe re the viola tion is due

to willfulne ss, ba d fa ith, or fa u lt of the [pla intiff] ” (c ita

tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d )). C ontra ry to Sim on’ s c onte ntions, the distric t c ourt did not a

buse its disc re tion by

qua shing Simon’ s notic e s of de positions or de ny ing Sim o n’ s m otions to c o m pe l, be c a u se Sim on fa ile d to c om

ply with the Fe de ra l R

ule s of C i vil Proc e d ure and the distric t c ourt’ s sc he duling order. Se e Fe d. R . C iv. P. 31; Laub v . U.S. De p’t of Inte r ior , 342 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th C ir. 2003) (noting the distric t c ourt’ s broa d disc re tion in disc o ve ry m atte rs a nd disc ussing “ substa

ntia l pre judic e ” re quire m e nt for re ve rsa l). 1 3 - 1 5 3 0 8 2W e re je c t a s without me rit Sim on’ s c onte ntions tha t the distric t c ourt wa s bia s e d a ga i nst him

and e rrone ously

ignore d a writte n de position, a

nd tha t de fe nda nts did not a

nswe r the c om

pla int. W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 5 3 0 8 3
#### § 75.157 The State reviews each application.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70321, Aug. 29, 2024.

A State that receives an application under § 75.156 may review and comment on the application.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 3474)
#### § 685.223 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a *et seq.*)

[81 FR 76086, Nov. 1, 2016]
### SUBCHAPTER II—TRADE AGREEMENTS
### SUBCHAPTER I—NEGOTIATING AND OTHER AUTHORITY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 496.60

 497.10

 497.70

 498.30

 498.70

 499.55

 499.98

 500.27

 500.71

 501.26

 502.00

 502.72

 503.80

 504.40

 505.30

 505.80

 506.30

 506.78

 507.20

 508.26

 508.38

 508.20

 508.04

 508.76

 508.61

 508.48

 509.42

 509.62

 509.85

 510.30

 1,468,847

 1,474,536

 1,481,373

 1,488,221

 1,492,792

 1,502,521

 1,507,451

 1,510,780

 1,515,834

 1,522,160

 1,530,685

 1,538,995

 1,551,490

 1,558,446

 1,568,900

 1,574,718

 1,580,544

 1,586,143

 1,591,048

 1,603,451

 1,604,857

 1,602,748

 1,600,874

 1,609,313

 1,607,553

 1,606,029

 1,617,061

 1,619,412

 1,622,116

 1,627,412

 3,419

 2,704

 2,697

 5,657

 5,625

 10,037

 3,395

 4,720

 4,711

 4,130

 2,475

 2,467

 7,184

 2,374

 3,525

 3,048

 4,555

 3,253

 3,224

 10,296

 3,486

 3,474

 3,525

 9,715

 2,437

 3,824

 12,428

 4,597

 4,738

 7,052

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL May 9, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2005 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 164,474 0 5,845 132,474

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 5,909

 5,689

 6,837

 6,848

 4,571

 9,729

 4,930

 3,329

 5,054

 6,326

 8,525

 8,310

 12,495

 6,956

 10,454

 5,818

 5,826

 5,599

 4,905

 12,403

 1,406

-2,109

-1,874

 8,439

-1,760

-1,524

 11,032

 2,351

 2,704

 5,296

 338

 214

 201

 180

 183

 165

 165

 167

 156

 147

 153

 150

 147

 167

 180

 181

 174

 175

 189

 177

 184

 188

 197

 221

 210

 201

 192

 191

 226

 426

3,065

2,013

2,658

4,909

5,107

9,872

2,968

4,468

4,332

3,801

2,154

1,866

6,508

2,334

3,239

2,240

3,967

3,105

2,841

9,791

3,369

3,147

3,273

9,103

2,300

3,311

11,840

4,288

4,340

6,265

ELEV STORAGE

 144,772

 475,782

 477,795

 480,453

 485,362

 490,469

 500,341

 503,309

 507,777

 512,109

 515,910

 518,064

 519,930

 526,438

 528,772

 532,011

 534,251

 538,218

 541,323

 544,164

 553,955

 557,324

 560,471

 563,744

 572,847

 575,147

 578,458

 590,298

 594,586

 598,926

 605,191

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 472,717

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0