alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 495

 490

 516

 495

 486

 509

 532

 511

 530

 553

 536

 540

 547

 556

 548

 548

 552

 560

 556

 567

 595

 589

 549

 525

 513

 510

 522

 538

 545

 525

 438

 442

 453

 421

 432

 422

 419

 421

 436

 484

 470

 489

 478

 493

 489

 479

 473

 465

 468

 478

 475

 484

 480

 479

 465

 457

 464

 465

 457

 451

 458

 473

 486

 471

 465

 474

 479

 477

 488

 509

 501

 517

 521

 526

 514

 518

 517

 512

 514

 520

 532

 529

 518

 503

 483

 484

 485

 497

 506

 500

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 299

 308

 316

 307

 303

 309

 312

 311

 318

 331

 326

 336

 338

 341

 334

 336

 336

 332

 334

 337

 345

 343

 336

 327

 314

 315

 316

 323

 329

 325

TOTAL 14,977

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 19.286 Gauging of spirits in bottles.

When gauging spirits in bottles, the proprietor may determine the proof and quantity from case markings and label information if the bottles are full and there is no evidence that tampering has occurred.

(26 U.S.C. 5204, 5559)
(No. 74-CC-227

#### Carol A. Moses, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 8, 1974.*

Carol A. Moses, Claimant, pro se.

*195William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Jefferson 

County 

Lewis & Clark U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

County Bureau of Land Management 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown Butte Field Office Field Office
 

Miles City Helena
 

Butte Field Office
 Draft RMP/EIS 

Field

Office
 Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon
 Map 41: Areas of Disposal and 

Field Office
 Retention Under Alternatives B, C & D 

Broadwater 

Miles County 0 400 

Townsend 

Anaconda 

Deer Lodge 

Butte County 

Silver Bow
 

County
 

Gallatin 

County 

Livingston Bozeman 

City 

Interstate US Route 

Park 

MT Route County Disposal 

Retention 

County Boundary Field Office Boundary 

Map shows land identified for either disposal or retention under Alternatives B, C, and D. Lands in the disposal category are generally available for the full array of land adjustment actions. Lands in the retention category would generally be managed for retention but could be available for some disposal actions subject Miles to the land ownership adjustment criteria in Appendix K. 0 40 Map Scale 1:510,000 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2120

TONY DUPREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

SHARONDA THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

versus

TRINITY HOME IMPROVEMENT, INCORPORATED; LELAND

WHEATLEY, C.E.O.; TROY WHEATLEY, President;

PAULA WHEATLEY, Vice-President; NORMAN

WHITELOCK, Vice-President,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-

271-L)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony DuPree, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tony DuPree seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.

2001) employment discrimination complaint as to some, but not all,

Defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor

an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Part A—Foreign Trade Barriers and Unfair Trade Practices
§ 75.250 Maximum funding period. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70328 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary may approve a project period of up to 60 months to perform the substantive work of a grant.
( b ) The Secretary may approve a data collection period for a grant for a period of up to 72 months after the end of the project period and provide funding for the data collection period for the sole purpose of collecting, analyzing, and reporting performance measurement data regarding the project. The Secretary may inform applicants of the Secretary's intent to approve data collection periods in the application notice published for a competition or may decide to fund data collection periods after grantees have started their project periods.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474.)
[78 FR 49353, Aug. 13, 2013]
PROPOSAL THREE  INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES AUTHORIZED FOR
ISSUANCE UNDER THE 1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
    Accordingly, our board of directors believes that increasing the number of shares available for
issuance pursuant to the ESPP is in the best interests of us and our stockholders and recommends a
vote FOR the increase in the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to the ESPP.
 Description of the ESPP
  Administration
  Eligibility
  Offerings
  1




---



##### 



Purchase Limitations
  Purchase Price
  Amendment and Termination
  Merger or Consolidation
  Plan Benefits
  Number of SharesPurchased Under theESPPSudhir Agrawal, D. Phil.(1)
    
    
    Louis L. Arcudi, III
    
    
    5,865Timothy M. Sullivan Ph.D.
    
    
    32,951Robert D. Arbeit, M.D.
    
    
    3,251All current executive officers as a group (4 persons)
    
    
    42,067All employees as a group other than the current
executive officers as a group
    
    
    120,815
 2




---



##### 



(1)
    
    As the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, Dr. Agrawal may not participate
in the ESPP.  Federal Income Tax Consequences
  Tax Consequences to Participants
    
    
    15% of the value of the common stock on the day the offering commenced; and
    
    the participants profit.
   Tax Consequences to Us
 There will be no tax consequences to us except that we will be entitled to a deduction when a
participant has compensation income upon a disqualifying disposition. Any such deduction will be
subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.
 3
§ 24.233 Addition of spirits to wine. ( a ) *Prior to the addition of spirits.* Wine will be placed in tanks approved for the addition of spirits. The proprietor shall accurately measure the wine, determine its alcohol content, determine the proof of the spirits to be added, calculate the quantity of spirits required, and enter the details in the record of spirits added to wine.
( b ) *After the addition of spirits.* The proprietor shall thoroughly agitate the contents of the tank to assure a complete mixture of the wine and spirits. The proprietor shall then measure the volume of wine in the tank, take a representative sample of the wine, and test for alcohol content. The result of the measurement and test and the quantity of spirits added will be entered in the record of spirits added to wine. The volume of wine used and the volume of wine resulting from the addition of spirits will be entered in the bulk wine record. The alcohol content of wine after the addition of spirits may not exceed 24 percent by volume.
(Sec. 201, Pub. L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1381, as amended, 1382, as amended, 1383, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5367, 5373, 5382))
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0298)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5357 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize a pilot program to 

develop, expand, and enhance the commercialization of biomedical products, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2019 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize a 

pilot program to develop, expand, and enhance the commercialization of biomedical products, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Innovation Network 

5 and Capital Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5357 IH

1 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM FOR RESEARCH STARTUPS. 

2 Part A of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 281 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 404O. PILOT PROGRAM FOR RESEARCH STARTUPS. 

6 ‘‘(a) FUNDS.—The Director of NIH shall award 

7 grants or contracts to eligible entities to develop, expand, 

8 and enhance the commercialization of biomedical products. 

9 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘eligible entity’ means an entity receiving funding under— 

11 ‘‘(1) the Small Business Innovation Research 

12 program of the National Institutes of Health; or 

13 ‘‘(2) the Small Business Technology Transfer 

14 program of the National Institutes of Health. 

15 ‘‘(c) USE OF FUNDS.—An eligible entity shall use the 

16 funds received through such grant or contract to sup17 port— 

18 ‘‘(1) the Commercialization Readiness Pilot 

19 program of the National Institutes of Health; 

20 ‘‘(2) the Innovation Corps program of the Na21 tional Institutes of Health; 

22 ‘‘(3) the Commercialization Accelerator pro23 gram of the National Institutes of Health; 

24 ‘‘(4) the Commercialization Assistance program 

25 of the National Institutes of Health; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5357 IH

1 ‘‘(5) such other programs and activities as the 

2 Director of NIH determines to be appropriate, to 

3 support the commercialization stage of research, 

4 later stage research and development, technology 

5 transfer, and commercialization technical assistance. 

6 ‘‘(d) NIH STARTUP SUPPORT ACCOUNT.— 

7 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in 

8 the Treasury an account, to be known as the NIH 

9 Startup Support Account, for purposes of carrying 

10 out this section. 

11 ‘‘(2) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—There shall be 

12 transferred to the NIH Startup Support Account 

13 from the general fund of the Treasury, 

14 $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 

15 2025, to be available until expended without further 

16 appropriation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Post Office Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov 

H. CARL MYERS

Assistant Attorney General 

General Litigation Division 

512-463-2120 

FAX: (512) 320-0667 

EMAIL: carl.myers@texasattorneygeneral.gov

June 13, 2016 

Via FileandServeXpress 

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals 

209 West 14th Street, Room 401 

Austin, Texas 78701 

RE: Cause No. 03-16-00062-CV; Williams v. Paul, et al., on appeal from the 200th District 

Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No, D-1-GN-005833 (appeal of denial of Plea to 

the Jurisdiction).

Cause No. 03-16-00052-CV; La Marque Indep. Sch. Dist., et al. v. Willaims, on appeal 

from the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-00583 (appeal 

of denial of Motion for Temporary Injunction) 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Please file this letter on behalf of appellants. Counsel is being served by electronic 

service provider. Thank you for your assistance. 

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: 

I write regarding the above-referenced cross appeals related to the La Marque 

Independent School District. TEA’s Commissioner appeals the denial of his plea and the District 

appeals the denial of its temporary injunction motion. Both appeals raise issues of great 

importance to the State’s administration of public education. 

Pursuant to statute, closure of the La Marque Independent School District is scheduled 

for July 1, 2016. Because of the impending closure deadline, the timeliness of this Court’s 

determination of the issues is of paramount importance. At this time, both appeals are fully 

briefed and ripe for submission, set by this Court for June 23, 2016. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ H. Carl Myers 

ACCEPTED

03-16-00062-CV

11121360

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/13/2016 5:09:29 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/13/2016 5:09:29 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
H. CARL MYERS 

Assistant Attorney General 

General Litigation Division 

 

cc: 

Ron Rainey 

Chris Tritico
### §2611. Certain material and articles exempt from this chapter

The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to—

(1) any archaeological or ethnological material or any article of cultural property which is imported into the United States for temporary exhibition or display if such material or article is immune from seizure under judicial process pursuant to section 2459 of title 22; or

(2) any designated archaeological or ethnological material or any article of cultural property imported into the United States if such material or article—

(A) has been held in the United States for a period of not less than three consecutive years by a recognized museum or religious or secular monument or similar institution, and was purchased by that institution for value, in good faith, and without notice that such material or article was imported in violation of this chapter, but only if—

(i) the acquisition of such material or article has been reported in a publication of such institution, any regularly published newspaper or periodical with a circulation of at least fifty thousand, or a periodical or exhibition catalog which is concerned with the type of article or materials sought to be exempted from this chapter,

(ii) such material or article has been exhibited to the public for a period or periods aggregating at least one year during such three-year period, or

(iii) such article or material has been cataloged and the catalog material made available upon request to the public for at least two years during such three-year period;

(B) if subparagraph (A) does not apply, has been within the United States for a period of not less than ten consecutive years and has been exhibited for not less than five years during such period in a recognized museum or religious or secular monument or similar institution in the Unites 1 States open to the public; or

(C) if subparagraphs (A) and (B) do not apply, has been within the United States for a period of not less than ten consecutive years and the State Party concerned has received or should have received during such period fair notice (through such adequate and accessible publication, or other means, as the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe) of its location within the United States; and

(D) if none of the preceding subparagraphs apply, has been within the United States for a period of not less than twenty consecutive years and the claimant establishes that it purchased the material or article for value without knowledge or reason to believe that it was imported in violation of law.

(Pub. L. 97–446, title III, §312, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2362.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the 90th day after Jan. 12, 1983, or on any date which the President shall prescribe and publish in the Federal Register, with exceptions, see section 315 of Pub. L. 97–446, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "United".
§ 19.679 Duration of permit. The proprietor of an alcohol fuel plant may conduct the operations authorized by the permit on a continuing basis unless: ( a ) The proprietor voluntarily surrenders the permit;
( b ) TTB suspends or revokes the permit pursuant to § 19.697; or
( c ) The permit is automatically terminated under its own terms or in accordance with § 19.684.
(26 U.S.C. 5181)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNV9230000 L13100000.FI0000 241A; NVN-78597; NVN-85277; NVN-85278; 11-08807; MO#4500019638; TAS: 14x1109]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Makoil, Inc. and Piney Fork Production Co., for competitive oil and gas leases NVN-78597, NVN-85277, and NVN-85278 on land in Nye County, Nevada. The petition was timely filed and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the leases terminated under the law. No valid leases have been issued affecting the lands.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Atanda Clark, BLM Nevada State Office, 775-861-6632, or                         *e-mail: Atanda_Clark@blm.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rental and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee for each lease and have reimbursed the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all of the requirements for reinstatement of the leases as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 [30 U.S.C. 188], and the BLM is proposing to reinstate the leases effective July 1, 2010 under the original terms and conditions of the leases and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM has not issued a lease affecting the lands encumbered by these leases to any other interest in the interim.                

Authority:43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b).

Gary Johnson,

Deputy State Director, Minerals Management.

[FR Doc. 2011-8073 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
### Part A—Financial Assistance for Bilingual Education Programs
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 6,825

 8,060

 8,071

 8,461

 7,454

 6,441

 6,934

 6,689

 8,550

 8,826

 8,516

 9,583

 8,540

 9,928

 9,461

 8,480

 7,551

 7,067

 7,304

 6,174

 8,436

 8,894

 10,111

 8,384

 9,067

 9,269

 8,587

 9,108

 9,417

 9,040

 982

 1,478

 1,555

 1,123

 977

 798

 834

 1,004

 1,180

 1,559

 1,784

 2,210

 1,858

 3,245

 2,931

 1,998

 1,628

 1,805

 1,464

 1,307

 1,576

 3,253

 1,964

 1,328

 1,539

 2,050

 1,864

 2,538

 2,944

 2,312

 3,529

 4,066

 4,142

 4,023

 3,299

 3,527

 3,932

 4,314

 4,633

 5,299

 5,347

 5,597

 5,385

 6,128

 5,915

 4,984

 4,180

 4,158

 4,214

 4,355

 4,915

 6,137

 5,419

 4,934

 5,199

 5,562

 5,269

 5,469

 5,634

 5,079

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 50,448

 50,140

 50,219

 50,296

 49,774

 49,593

 50,048

 51,142

 52,513

 54,559

 56,503

 58,502

 60,452

 63,221

 65,607

 66,525

 66,563

 66,698

 67,613

 68,441

 69,424

 71,247

 72,033

 71,668

 71,520

 71,485

 71,369

 70,710

 70,429

 70,524

 3,603

 3,581

 3,587

 3,593

 3,555

 3,542

 3,575

 3,653

 3,751

 3,897

 4,036

 4,179

 4,318

 4,516

 4,686

 4,752

 4,755

 4,764

 4,830

 4,889

 4,959

 5,089

 5,145

 5,119

 5,109

 5,106

 5,098

 5,051

 5,031

 5,037

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 6900

#### Anesthesiologists, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 11, 1973.*

The Professional Bookkeeper, for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §6002. Immunity generally

Whenever a witness refuses, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or provide other information in a proceeding before or ancillary to—

(1) a court or grand jury of the United States,

(2) an agency of the United States, or

(3) either House of Congress, a joint committee of the two Houses, or a committee or a subcommittee of either House,

and the person presiding over the proceeding communicates to the witness an order issued under this title, the witness may not refuse to comply with the order on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination; but no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §201(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 927; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330013(4), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "under this title" for "under this part" in concluding provisions.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Justin Sanders, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00079

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13F1051

- 102 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter * participating. *Justice Carter

, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appe llant, Justin Sanders, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 12, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Marie Gross et al. v. Chrysler Sales Corporation.

Present—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.