alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.223 Persons liable for tax. ( a ) *Distilling.* Under 26 U.S.C. 5005, the distiller of spirits is liable for the tax and each proprietor or possessor of, and person in any manner interested in the use of, any still, distilling apparatus, or distillery, shall be jointly and severally liable for the tax on distilled spirits produced. However, a person, not an officer or director of a corporate proprietor, owning or having the right of control of not more than 10 percent of any class of stock of that proprietor, is not liable by reason of the stock ownership or control. Persons transferring spirits in bond are relieved of tax liability if: ( 1 ) The proprietors of transferring and receiving distilled spirits plant premises are independent of each other and neither has a proprietary interest, directly or indirectly, in the business of the other, and
( 2 ) No person liable for the tax on transferred spirits retains any interest in the spirits.
( b ) *Storage on bonded premises.* Under 26 U.S.C. 5005(c) each person operating bonded premises will be liable for the tax on all spirits while the spirits are stored on the premises, and on all spirits that are in transit to the premises from the time of removal from the transferor's bonded premises, pursuant to an approved application. Liability for the tax continues until the spirits are transferred or withdrawn from bonded premises as authorized by law, or until the liability for tax is relieved under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 5008(a). Claims for relief from liability for spirits lost are covered in subpart J of this part. Voluntary destruction of spirits in bond is covered in subpart Q of this part.
( c ) *Withdrawals without payment of tax.* Under 26 U.S.C. 5005(e), any person who withdraws spirits from the bonded premises of a plant without payment of tax, as provided in 26 U.S.C. 5214, will be liable for the tax on the spirits from the time of withdrawal. The person will be relieved of any liability at the time the spirits are exported, deposited in a foreign trade zone, used in production of wine, deposited in a customs bonded warehouse, laden as supplies upon or used in the maintenance or repair of certain vessels or aircraft, or used for certain research, development or testing, as provided by law.
( d ) *Withdrawals free of tax.* Persons liable for tax under paragraph (a) of this section, are relieved of the liability on spirits withdrawn from bonded premises free of tax under this part, at the time the spirits are withdrawn.
( e ) *Withdrawn from customs custody without payment of tax.* Under 26 U.S.C. 5232(a) when imported distilled spirits in bulk containers are withdrawn from customs custody and transferred to the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant without payment of the tax imposed on imported distilled spirits by 26 U.S.C. 5001, the person operating the bonded premises of the distilled spirits plant to which spirits are transferred will become liable for the tax on the spirits upon their release from customs custody, and the importer will thereupon be relieved of liability for the tax.
(26 U.S.C. 5005, 5066, 5232)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,011

 2,095

 2,331

 3,641

 3,822

 5,257

 5,321

 5,852

 3,733

 4,594

 3,074

 3,234

 2,855

 1,753

 1,692

 1,166

 753

 784

 1,087

 1,518

 1,850

 1,782

 2,083

 3,159

 3,604

 4,685

 6,143

 3,940

 2,764

 1,252

 533

 437

 417

 490

 459

 410

 449

 618

 342

 376

 298

 272

 232

 208

 227

 280

 243

 230

 323

 307

 305

 316

 362

 396

 458

 419

 447

 731

 386

 297

 382

 275

 1,387

 1,082

 1,180

 1,447

 1,623

 2,011

 2,509

 2,672

 1,521

 1,189

 836

 917

 793

 641

 611

 489

 403

 391

 379

 440

 543

 605

 780

 990

 1,173

 1,883

 2,637

 1,997

 1,506

 717

 349

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 20,744

 20,214

 20,125

 20,416

 21,278

 21,938

 22,883

 23,909

 23,666

 22,900

 21,175

 20,891

 20,430

 19,808

 19,032

 18,439

 17,662

 16,606

 15,362

 13,791

 11,825

 9,758

 9,017

 8,818

 9,155

 10,121

 11,965

 13,321

 14,216

 14,444

 14,390

 1,482

 1,444

 1,438

 1,458

 1,520

 1,567

 1,635

 1,708

 1,690

 1,636

 1,513

 1,492

 1,459

 1,415

 1,359

 1,317

 1,262

 1,186

 1,097

 985

 845

 697

 644

 630

 654

 723

 855

 952

 1,015

 1,032

 1,028

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4736



# 
D ANIELF RANK

K ULLMAN , Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CR-99-12) Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL J. Robert Haley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Daniel Kullman appeals his conviction and sentence on several charges of probation violation. Kullman did not contest the violations, and the district court found Kullman guilty of violating his probation and sentenced Kullman to eleven months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. Kullman’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), claiming one error, but concluding that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. Kullman was notified of his right to file an additional brief, which he failed to do. In accordance with the requirements of Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. By counsel, Kullman claims the district court abused its discretion in sentencing him, but does not dispute that he was sentenced within a guidelines range which was properly calculated. We find no meritto Kullman’s claim on appeal because the district court has sound discretion to fix a sentence at any point within the guidelines range, United States v. Roberts , 881 F.2d 95, 106-107 (4th Cir. 1989), andits decision is not appealable where, as here, the range is correctly calculated. United States v. Porter , 909 F.2d 789, 794-95 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm Kullman’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. K ULLMAN
Case 20-33288-KLP Doc 5 Filed 07/30/20 Entered 07/31/20 09:08:57 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 20-33288-KLP Doc 5 Filed 07/30/20 Entered 07/31/20 09:08:57 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 76.789 What are an SEA's responsibilities under this subpart? ( a ) *Information.* Upon receiving notice under § 76.788(a) of the date a charter school LEA is scheduled to open or significantly expand its enrollment, an SEA must provide the charter school LEA with timely and meaningful information about each covered program in which the charter school LEA may be eligible to participate, including notice of any upcoming competitions under the program.
( b ) *Allocation of Funds.* ( 1 ) An SEA must allocate funds under a covered program in accordance with this subpart to any charter school LEA that— ( i ) Opens for the first time or significantly expands its enrollment during an academic year for which the State awards funds by formula or through a competition under the program;
( ii ) In accordance with § 76.791(a), establishes its eligibility and complies with all applicable program requirements; and
( iii ) Meets the requirements of § 76.788(a).
( 2 ) In order to meet the requirements of this subpart, an SEA may allocate funds to, or reserve funds for, an eligible charter school LEA based on reasonable estimates of projected enrollment at the charter school LEA.
( 3 ) ( i ) The failure of an eligible charter school LEA or its authorized public chartering agency to provide notice to its SEA in accordance with § 76.788(a) relieves the SEA of any obligation to allocate funds to the charter school within five months.
( ii ) Except as provided in § 76.792(c), an SEA that receives less than 120 days' actual notice of the date an eligible charter school LEA is scheduled to open or significantly expand its enrollment must allocate funds to the charter school LEA on or before the date the SEA allocates funds to LEAs under the applicable covered program for the succeeding academic year.
( iii ) The SEA may provide funds to the charter school LEA from the SEA's allocation under the applicable covered program for the academic year in which the charter school LEA opened or significantly expanded its enrollment, or from the SEA's allocation under the program for the succeeding academic year.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0623) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8065a)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 4,927

 4,995

 3,653

 2,993

 2,068

 2,089

 2,672

 3,285

 3,172

 2,280

 3,212

 3,090

 3,076

 4,802

 3,940

 3,961

 3,584

 3,364

 3,450

 4,025

 4,377

 5,126

 5,093

 5,385

 4,108

 4,217

 3,787

 3,605

 3,758

 4,049

 623

 568

 531

 499

 488

 451

 418

 421

 399

 347

 327

 377

 411

 441

 394

 410

 525

 511

 561

 574

 507

 551

 568

 551

 466

 422

 467

 447

 527

 511

 1,700

 1,536

 1,237

 962

 790

 856

 899

 931

 1,031

 833

 879

 1,133

 1,468

 1,673

 1,418

 1,317

 1,323

 1,502

 1,373

 1,462

 1,619

 1,796

 1,688

 1,753

 1,564

 1,456

 1,355

 1,477

 1,741

 1,679

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 20,512

 20,505

 20,192

 19,715

 19,273

 18,914

 18,582

 18,137

 17,724

 17,024

 16,296

 15,754

 15,717

 15,928

 15,646

 15,427

 15,513

 16,053

 16,636

 17,242

 17,962

 18,827

 19,484

 20,404

 21,089

 21,412

 21,299

 21,103

 21,426

 21,788

 1,465

 1,465

 1,442

 1,408

 1,377

 1,351

 1,327

 1,296

 1,266

 1,216

 1,164

 1,125

 1,123

 1,138

 1,118

 1,102

 1,108

 1,147

 1,188

 1,232

 1,283

 1,345

 1,392

 1,457

 1,506

 1,529

 1,521

 1,507

 1,530

 1,556

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
```

[114th Congress Public Law 243]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 980]]

Public Law 114-243
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
    Veterans Affairs in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ``PFC James Dunn VA 
             Clinic''. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2016 -  [S. 3283]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PFC JAMES DUNN VA CLINIC IN PUEBLO, 
                              COLORADO.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs in Pueblo, Colorado, shall after the date 
of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``PFC James 
Dunn VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community-
based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
considered to be a reference to the PFC James Dunn VA Clinic.

    Approved October 7, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3283:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            July 14, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 599

 601

 602

 592

 583

 584

 591

 605

 615

 623

 623

 618

 598

 565

 551

 587

 632

 647

 665

 668

 668

 667

 666

 663

 660

 655

 651

 642

 634

 629

 621

 596

 599

 592

 584

 580

 580

 584

 592

 606

 615

 618

 599

 566

 538

 539

 551

 587

 633

 648

 664

 665

 665

 663

 660

 654

 650

 642

 632

 629

 622

 618

 598

 600

 598

 587

 581

 581

 587

 599

 610

 619

 620

 610

 583

 550

 542

 568

 608

 639

 656

 666

 667

 666

 665

 661

 658

 654

 647

 638

 632

 626

 619

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 386

 387

 386

 379

 375

 375

 379

 386

 393

 399

 399

 393

 376

 356

 351

 367

 392

 411

 421

 428

 428

 428

 427

 424

 423

 420

 416

 410

 407

 403

 399

TOTAL 19,135

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### Eugenia Silberfeld, Respondent, v. Swiss Bank Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

*757Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
(No. 6789

#### 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September*5, *1972.*

3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Steven B. Lapin, certify that: 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Aristotle Corporation; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  March 29, 2005

/s/ Steven B. Lapin 

Steven B. Lapin

President and Chief Operating Officer
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 904 226 378 34,387 2,456

2 498 196 268 33,279 2,377

3 248 112 159 31,640 2,260

4 156 108 128 29,290 2,092

5 141 112 122 26,328 1,881

6 157 125 136 23,014 1,644

7 152 129 137 19,827 1,416

8 143 113 124 16,732 1,195

9 138 112 123 13,439 960

10 155 127 137 9,352 668

11 152 124 141 6,594 471

12 168 127 144 4,339 310

13 167 135 151 2,806 200

14 163 130 146 2,294 164

15 150 121 135 2,051 147

16 159 121 133 1,916 137

17 161 108 128 1,885 135

18 156 119 133 1,890 135

19 154 120 134 1,902 136

20 151 119 134 1,900 136

21 168 138 149 1,912 137

22 170 147 157 1,945 139

23 175 151 162 1,984 142

24 0 0 0 1,847 132

25 0 0 0 1,706 122

26 0 0 0 1,562 112

27 0 0 0 1,411 101

28 0 0 0 1,265 90

29 0 0 0 1,130 81

30 0 0 0 997 71

31 0 0 0 869 62

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Period: January 2023 Run Date: 2/3/2023
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In
connection with the amended annual report of IMPCO Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas M.
Costales, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |  |  |  |                                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 21, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS M.
COSTALES                               
|                        |  |  |  | Thomas M. Costales Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary L. WhitlockGary L. WhitlockExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 10, 2011
§ 940.13 Project administration. ( a ) Prior to authorization of highway trust funds for construction or implementation of ITS projects, compliance with § 940.11 shall be demonstrated.
( b ) Compliance with this part will be monitored under Federal-aid oversight procedures as provided under 23 U.S.C. 106 and 133.
#### § 662.2 Who is eligible to receive an institutional grant under this program?

An institution of higher education is eligible to receive an institutional grant.

(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
No. 15,878.

#### Squires et al. *v.*McNulty.

(195 P. [2d] 742)

Decided June 21, 1948.

Mr. Allyn Cole, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Frank Delaney, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.