alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 515 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 515

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
       the deduction for certain State, local, and foreign taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2019

Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Rose of New York, 
 Mr. Brindisi, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Ms. 
Bass, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sires, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. 
     Meeks, Mr. Correa, Mr. Cisneros, Mr. Sherman, Mrs. Torres of 
 California, and Mr. Gottheimer) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
       the deduction for certain State, local, and foreign taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State And Local Tax Deduction 
Fairness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN STATE, LOCAL, AND 
              FOREIGN TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 164(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (6).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
### §2074. Establishment of revolving fund

There is established a revolving fund of $300,000 which shall be available, without fiscal year limitation exclusively for transfer to the appropriation for collecting the revenue from customs to cover obligations of the United States Customs Service arising from authorized reimbursable services, pending reimbursement from parties in interest: Provided, That amounts so transferred shall be returned to the revolving fund not later than six months after the close of the fiscal year in which transferred.

(June 30, 1949, ch. 286, title I, 63 Stat. 360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 281g of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5 by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, §1, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Change of Name

"United States Customs Service" substituted in text for "Bureau of Customs" pursuant to Treasury Department Order 165–23, Apr. 4, 1973, eff. Aug. 1, 1973, 38 F.R. 13037. See, also, section 308 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers of Department of the Treasury and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Treasury, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 1281, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §3046. Warrant or summons—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Issuance upon complaint, Rule 4.

Issuance upon indictment, Rule 9.

Summons on request of government; form; contents; service; return, Rules 4, 9.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 816.)
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12004V189

**Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe - PART III — THE POLICIES AND FUNCTIONING OF THE UNION - TITLE III — INTERNAL POLICIES AND ACTION - CHAPTER II — ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLICY - Section 2 — Monetary policy - Article III-189***Official Journal 310 , 16/12/2004 P. 0083 - 0083*

Article III-189

Each Member State shall ensure that its national legislation, including the statutes of its national central bank, is compatible with the Constitution and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.

--------------------------------------------------
#### Northern Blvd. and Main Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Ansched Saltz et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5062

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, as the ``Officer 
                  Robert German Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. OFFICER ROBERT GERMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer Robert German Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Robert German Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-25-2005

USA v. Barbour

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 01-3523

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Barbour" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1138.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1138
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-3523

__________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

OTTO BARBOUR,

 Appellant

 

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT 

OF THE UNITED STATES 

D.C. Crim. No. 00-cr-00419-7

District Judge: The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno

 

Submitted: March 29, 2005

 

Before: ALITO, BARRY, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed May 25, 2005)

 

OPINION

 

BARRY, Circuit Judge

Appellant Otto Barbour was sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. §

4B1.1 to a term of imprisonment of 235 months following his conviction on drug

distribution charges. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by us on appeal, and he
2

thereafter petitioned for a writ of certiorari. On January 24, 2005, the Supreme Court

entered an order granting certiorari, vacating the judgment, and remanding the case to this

Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. , 125 S.Ct.

738 (2005). 

Having determined that the sentencing issues appellant raises are best determined

by the District Court in the first instance, we will remand to the District Court for

resentencing in accordance with Booker. Appellant raises no challenge to his conviction

and we will, again, affirm the judgment of conviction.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division

In re: 

Grecian Willette Thrias Standley

Debtor 

Chapter 13

Case No. 20-71174-FJS

_______________________________________

RESPONSE TO DEBTOR’S MOTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY

NOW COMES, PNC Bank, National Association, by and through counsel 

(“Respondent”), files its Response to Debtor’s Motion to Sell Real Property located at 6424 

Aberdeen Place, Suffolk, VA 23435 (“Motion to Sell”) and as reasons respectfully represents 

as follows:

1. Respondent is a Secured Creditor which holds a first lien on the above 

referenced real property.

2. On or about April 6, 2020, Grecian Willette Thrias Standley (“Debtor”) filed a 

Voluntary Petition in this Court under Chapter 13 of the United States 

Bankruptcy Code.

3. On or about December 7, 2021, the Debtor filed their Motion to Sell.

4. Respondent does not object to the sale on the condition that the lien is paid in 

full, subject to a proper payoff quote from Respondent, which will been sent to 

Debtor’s counsel upon request.

Case 20-71174-FJS Doc 50 Filed 12/21/21 Entered 12/21/21 15:46:39 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Respondent, requests the Debtor’s Motion to Sell be granted.

Date: December 21, 2021

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Daniel K. Eisenhauer 

Daniel K. Eisenhauer, Bar #85242

Orlans PC

PO Box 2548

Leesburg, VA 20177

(703) 777-7101

Attorney for PNC Bank, National Association

deisenhauer@orlans.com

Case 20-71174-FJS Doc 50 Filed 12/21/21 Entered 12/21/21 15:46:39 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned states that on December 21, 2021, copies of the foregoing Response to 

Debtor’s Motion to Sell Real Property were filed with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF 

system, which will send notification of such filing to the following:

Michael P. Cotter

870 Greenbrier Circle, Suite 402

Chesapeake, VA 23320

mpcotter@mpcch13.com

Bankruptcy Trustee

John Russell Bollinger

Lorin D. Hay

Kathryne Mary Rose Shaw

Boleman Law Firm, P.C. 

Convergence Center III 

272 Bendix Road, Suite 330 

Virginia Beach, VA 23452

ecf@bolemanlaw.com

Debtor’s Attorney

and I hereby certify that I have caused to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, copies 

of the foregoing Response to Debtor’s Motion to Sell Real Property to the following non-ECF 

participants:

Grecian Willette Thrias Standley

6424 Aberdeen Place 

Suffolk, VA 23435

Debtor 

Christopher D. Standley

6424 Aberdeen Place

Suffolk, VA 23435

Co-Debtor

/s/Daniel K. Eisenhauer______

Daniel K. Eisenhauer, Esquire

Case 20-71174-FJS Doc 50 Filed 12/21/21 Entered 12/21/21 15:46:39 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ForeFront Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Michael S. Hedge, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Randall J. Frapart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ForeFront Holdings, Inc.

Dated: November 14, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael S. Hedge   
|Michael S. Hedge       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Randall J. Frapart 
|Randall J. Frapart     
|Chief Financial Officer
From: Mark, Jeremy

To: aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about TSDs for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule for the 2008

Ozone NAAQS [2060-AS05]

Date: Friday, October 16, 2015 5:14:00 PM

Attachments: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928 Preparation of Emissions

Inventory.pdf

Aaron,

I discovered one document associated with the Air Quality Modeling TSD was not included in

yesterday’s message. I have attached it to this e-mail.

Jeremy Mark

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Markets Division

Phone (202) 343-9087 Fax (202) 343-2359

Mail code 6204J

From: Mark, Jeremy

Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 6:34 PM

To: 'aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov'

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about TSDs for the Cross-State Air

Pollution Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS [2060-AS05]

Aaron,

I have attached four Technical Support Documents for the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule for the 2008

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards proposal (EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update

2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150928). Included are the:

1) Air Quality Modeling TSD (along with two attached appendices)

2) EGU NO X Mitigation Strategies TSD

3) Ozone Transport Policy TSD (along with 1 attached appendix)

4) Status of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) SIPs TSD

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jeremy Mark

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Markets Division

Phone (202) 343-9087 Fax (202) 343-2359
### §3242. Indians committing certain offenses; acts on reservations

All Indians committing any offense listed in the first paragraph of and punishable under section 1153 (relating to offenses committed within Indian country) of this title shall be tried in the same courts and in the same manner as are all other persons committing such offense within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 827; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §51, 63 Stat. 96; Pub. L. 89–707, §2, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1101; Pub. L. 94–297, §4, May 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 586.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §548 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §328, 35 Stat. 1151; June 1932, ch. 284, 47 Stat. 337).

The provisions defining rape in accordance with the law of the State and prescribing imprisonment at the discretion of the court for rape by an Indian upon an Indian are now included in section 1153 of this title. (See also section 6 of this title.)

Section 549 of said title 18, relating to crimes in Indian reservations in South Dakota, was omitted as covered by section 1153 of this title. Accordingly the last sentence of said section 548, extending this section to prosecutions of Indians in South Dakota, was also omitted as unnecessary because this section is sufficient and applicable. Other provisions of said section 548 are incorporated in sections 1151 and 1153 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 51] conforms section 3242 of title 18, U.S.C., with sections 1151 and 1153 of such title, thus eliminating inconsistency and ambiguity with respect to the definition of Indian country.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–297 substituted provision setting out reference to offenses listed in first paragraph of and punishable under section 1153 of this title, for provision specifically enumerating the covered offenses.

1966—Pub. L. 89–707 added carnal knowledge and assault with intent to commit rape as offenses cognizable within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States when committed on and within the Indian country.

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "within the Indian country" for "within any Indian reservation, including rights-of-way running through the reservation,".
#### In the Matter of Manhattan Savings Bank, Respondent. Princeton Apartments, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
§ 662.41 What are a fellow's responsibilities after the award of a fellowship? As a condition of retaining a fellowship, a fellow shall— ( a ) Maintain satisfactory progress in the conduct of his or her research;
( b ) Devote full time to research on the approved topic;
( c ) Not engage in unauthorized income-producing activities during the period of the fellowship; and
( d ) Remain a student in good standing with the grantee institution during the period of the fellowship.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
§ 300.307 Specific learning disabilities. ( a ) *General.* A State must adopt, consistent with § 300.309, criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability as defined in § 300.8(c)(10). In addition, the criteria adopted by the State— ( 1 ) Must not require the use of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, as defined in § 300.8(c)(10);
( 2 ) Must permit the use of a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention; and
( 3 ) May permit the use of other alternative research-based procedures for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, as defined in § 300.8(c)(10).
( b ) *Consistency with State criteria.* A public agency must use the State criteria adopted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section in determining whether a child has a specific learning disability.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 1401(30); 1414(b)(6))
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00039-CR & 04-19-00040-CR

Darrell Wayne MOFFETT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B1779 & B1780

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O RDER

We grant the State’s motions to consolidate appeal numbers 04-19-00039-CR and 04-19-

00040-CR, and order these appeals are consolidated. See, e.g., Katzenmaier v. State, No. 04-18-

00173-CR, 2018 WL 2694462, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 6, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) 

(per curiam) (consolidating appeals “[i]n the interest of efficient administration of [the] court’s 

docket”). 

 We order the parties to file all future motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals 

were one, but to put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(g) 

(requiring a filed document’s front cover to contain “the case number”). However, the record 

filed in each appeal will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes

necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The court 

will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
The Aristotle Corporation:

On February 15, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of The
Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003, which are included in the 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Our report refers to the Company's change in its method of accounting
for goodwill in 2002. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned
consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial
statement schedule as listed below. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 15, 2004

       SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                        DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             BALANCE AT   CHARGED TO    CHARGED TO
                              BEGINNING    COSTS AND      OTHER                         BALANCE AT
         DESCRIPTION          OF PERIOD    EXPENSES    ACCOUNTS (a)     DEDUCTIONS    END OF PERIOD
--------------------------   ----------   ----------   ------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                          <C>           <C>            <C>         <C>              <C>
Allowance for doubtful
   receivables
   Year ended December 31,
           2001              $  486,000    $ 140,000      $15,000     $(165,000)(b)    $  476,000
           2002              $  476,000    $ 167,000      $19,000     $(138,000)(b)    $  524,000
           2003              $  524,000    $ 107,000      $    --     $(144,000)(b)    $  487,000

Inventory reserves

   Year ended December 31,
           2001              $  886,000    $(131,000)     $17,000     $ 112,000 (b)    $  884,000
           2002              $  884,000    $ 522,000      $28,000     $(320,000)(b)    $1,114,000
           2003              $1,114,000    $ (56,000)     $    --     $  (9,000)(b)    $1,049,000
</TABLE>

(a) Allowance for doubtful receivables and inventory reserves acquired in
acquisitions.

(b) Includes write-offs of trade accounts receivable, net of recoveries of
amounts previously written-off and write-offs of obsolete inventory, net of
recoveries for book to physical inventory adjustments.
Exhibit 10.1


Summary of
Compensation to the Members of the Special Committee of the Board


In March of this year, the
Board established a Special Committee of the Board comprised entirely of
independent directors to address matters related to the previously announced
acquisition of Deerfield & Company LLC, the parent of our investment
manager, Deerfield Capital Management LLC. The resolution establishing the
Special Committee provided for each committee member to be paid $15,000 per month
as compensation for service on that committee, subject to an overall ceiling of
$82,500 per member based on the expectation that the acquisition would be
completed on approximately July 31, 2007. However in September 2007, in view of
the committee’s continued services after July 31, 2007, because the acquisition
had not been completed by that date due to the unexpected volatility in the
credit markets and because the services of the Special Committee are still
needed, the Board determined to remove the ceiling and to continue paying
members of the Special Committee the monthly amount. The Company has incurred
$450,000 in committee fees due to the members of the Special Committee, as of
September 30, 2007.