alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OCTOBER
31, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   108
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,551)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F.William Capp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ F. William Capp     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| F. William Capp         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

October 31, 2006

----
### **CHAPTER 5—ARSON**

Sec.
81.
Arson within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
#### § 342.2 Service of notice.

The notice required by 8 CFR 342.1 must be by personal service as described in 8 CFR 103.8(a)(2).

[76 FR 53805, Aug. 29, 2011]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our report dated December 3, 2002 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30,
2002. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of the Company on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-53461, 333-32994,
333-55044) of the aforementioned report.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Southfield, Michigan
December 30, 2002
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Bankruptcy Case No. 17-11618-KHK

Adversary Case No. 17-01085

I, Kelly L. Fitzpatrick, certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 18 years 

of age and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made. I further certify that the service of 

this alias summons and a copy of the Complaint was made on August 28, 2017, by:

x Mail Service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid, addressed to:

Salim Zamani

41837 Cordgrass Cir.

Stone Ridge, Virginia 20105-5600

Amir Raminpour

Sandground, West, Silek & Raminpour, PLC

8500 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400

Vienna, VA 22182

___ Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of defendant at:

___ Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at:

___ Publication: The defendant was served as follows: (Describe briefly):

___ State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of ___________, as follows: 

(Describe Briefly)

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

August 24, 2017

 /s/ Kelly L. Fitzpatrick ___

Kelly L. Fitzpatrick 

The Fitzpatrick Law Office, P.C. 

4118 Leonard Drive, Suite 200

Fairfax, Virginia 22030

(703) 352 7150

Janet M. Meiburger, Trustee

1493 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 201

Mc Lean, VA 22101

Case 17-01085-KHK Doc 9 Filed 08/28/17 Entered 08/28/17 18:43:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### Alfred J. Schwabe and William R. Chaine, Formerly Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Alfred J. Schwabe & Co., in the City of London, England, Respondents, *v.*Aladar Walter Herzog, Appellant.

Appeal from an order granting a judgment on the pleadings..

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to apply at Special Term to be allowed to serve an amended answer upon presenting to the court an answer which sets up some defense to the complaint, on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Ingraham, P. J., dissented on the ground that the allegations of the answer are sufficient to raise an issue, and that there is a good cause of action for a copartnership accounting alleged in the counterclainl. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to apply at Special Term, as stated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.
Appendix F 

Pre-Development Plan Agreement 

Between the Railroads and MDOT 

DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation 

F - 1

Pre-Development Plan Agreement Introduction 

The purpose of the Pre-Development Plan Agreement (PDPA) is to define the understandings of the parties 

regarding the development and implementation of the Detroit Intermodal Freight Terminal project. 

Preparation of the PDPA began in April 2003. It was first produced as a non-binding Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU), which was signed by Norfolk Southern Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway and 

Canadian National Railway. CSX choose not to sign. The MOU was included in the Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement (DEIS). Following the DEIS public hearing in June 2005, MDOT identified a Preferred 

Alternative, and the MOU was converted to the PDPA by adding a number of features, particularly the cost 

allocation (by percentage) of various elements of the project. Language was refined in other places, 

including: Section B – more explicit explanation of implementation steps; Section C – additional language 

related to withdrawal from the project; Section F – more detail on governance, with inclusion of a non-voting 

member of the community; Section G – more language related to modification of the DIFT Development 

Plan; and, Section H – language related to construction of two private bridges within the Livernois-Junction 

Yard. 

The PDPA has been executed by MDOT and all four Class I Railways affected by the Detroit 

International Freight Terminal project. 
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-2
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-3
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-4
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-5
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-6
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-7
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-8
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-9
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-10
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-11
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-12
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-13
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-14
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-15
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-16
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-17
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-18
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-19
DIFT Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation F-20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 230

 224

 230

 233

 263

 247

 282

 268

 247

 236

 242

 251

 238

 235

 241

 235

 235

 243

 251

 233

 224

 247

 234

 235

 236

 229

 245

 239

 209

 210

 211

 213

 215

 219

 220

 223

 222

 225

 231

 230

 229

 227

 226

 223

 221

 220

 217

 210

 207

 211

 216

 215

 212

 218

 222

 221

 215

 214

 216

 217

 225

 224

 231

 230

 228

 230

 234

 237

 233

 230

 232

 227

 225

 227

 231

 223

 214

 219

 224

 221

 223

 223

 229

 230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,043

 3,042

 3,044

 3,051

 3,065

 3,070

 3,081

 3,085

 3,079

 3,086

 3,103

 3,128

 3,149

 3,164

 3,181

 3,194

 3,203

 3,213

 3,219

 3,218

 3,201

 3,190

 3,186

 3,177

 3,166

 3,152

 3,148

 3,148

 217

 217

 217

 218

 219

 219

 220

 220

 220

 220

 222

 223

 225

 226

 227

 228

 229

 230

 230

 230

 229

 228

 228

 227

 226

 225

 225

 225

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 746

 624

 746

 741

 775

 748

 770

 725

 728

 727

 759

 712

 572

 526

 501

 455

 460

 462

 466

 471

 471

 473

 491

 495

 502

 510

 528

 600

 639

 692

 740

 516

 556

 562

 511

 537

 557

 539

 601

 584

 556

 534

 504

 444

 419

 416

 402

 417

 429

 432

 439

 450

 458

 463

 461

 465

 484

 483

 523

 555

 613

 571

 602

 593

 624

 605

 626

 649

 657

 677

 661

 639

 634

 575

 481

 459

 455

 426

 435

 451

 460

 456

 461

 465

 484

 482

 489

 501

 509

 565

 609

 665

 706

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 388

 382

 402

 390

 403

 417

 422

 434

 424

 411

 408

 371

 313

 300

 297

 279

 285

 295

 300

 298

 301

 303

 315

 314

 318

 326

 331

 365

 392

 427

 452

TOTAL 17,101

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 79.8 How does the Secretary provide States an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70343 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Secretary gives State processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities— ( 1 ) At least 30 days to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance in the form of noncompeting continuation awards; and
( 2 ) At least 60 days to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance other than noncompeting continuation awards.
( b ) The Secretary establishes a date for mailing or hand-delivering comments under paragraph (a) of this section using one of the following two procedures: ( 1 ) If the comments relate to continuation award applications, the Secretary notifies each applicant and each State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) of the date by which SPOC comments should be submitted.
( 2 ) If the comments relate to applications for new grants, the Secretary establishes the date in a notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Department have been delegated.
( d ) Applicants for programs and activities subject to Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Act shall allow areawide agencies a 60-day opportunity for review and comment.
(Authority: E.O. 12372, Sec. 2)
[48 FR 29166, June 24, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 20825, June 9, 1986]
§ 463.235 What are the reporting requirements for individual records for core Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) title I programs; the Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service program, as amended by WIOA title III; and the Vocational Rehabilitation program authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by WIOA title IV? ( a ) On a quarterly basis, each State must submit to the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, as appropriate, individual records that include demographic information, information on services received, and information on resulting outcomes, as appropriate, for each reportable individual in either of the following programs administered by the Secretary of Labor or Secretary of Education: A WIOA title I core program; the Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by WIOA title III; or the VR program authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by WIOA title IV.
( b ) For individual records submitted to the Secretary of Labor, those records may be required to be integrated across all programs administered by the Secretary of Labor in one single file.
( c ) States must comply with the requirements of sec. 116(d)(2) of WIOA as explained in guidance issued by the Departments of Labor and Education.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997,
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   1,212,473
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,303,815
<ALLOWANCES>                             (87,870)
<INVENTORY>                              2,631,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,160,440
<PP&E>                                   3,475,895
<DEPRECIATION>                           (1,310,428)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           12,195,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,066,915
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 12,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             12,195,430
<SALES>                                  8,313,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         8,313,328
<CGS>                                    6,074,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            16,955,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         78,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         5,937,355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       301,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (14,817,811)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (14,817,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (14,817,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (1.29)






</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF IMPERIAL BANCORP
 
 
All of the following subsidiaries of the Company are California corporations
except Imperial International Bank which is organized under the laws of the
United States and Imperial Trade Services, Ltd., which is incorporated in Hong
Kong. Each subsidiary is included in the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

                                                           
                                                           PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                           SECURITIES OWNED BY
NAME                                     IMMEDIATE PARENT    IMMEDIATE PARENT  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Altair Corporation                       Imperial Bancorp          100%
Imperial Bank                            Imperial Bancorp          100%
Imperial Bank Realty Company, Inc.       Imperial Bancorp          100%
Imperial Capital Trust I                 Imperial Bancorp          100%
Imperial Creditcorp                      Imperial Bancorp          100%
Crown American Bank                      Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Asset Advisors, Inc.            Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial International Bank              Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Securities Corporation          Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Trade Services, Ltd.            Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Trust Company                   Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Ventures, Inc.                  Imperial Bank             100%
Pacific Bancard Association, Inc.        Imperial Bank             100%
U S Audiotex, LLC                        Imperial Bank              80%
Imperial Capital Markets Group, Inc. (1) Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Financial Group (1)             Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Global Trading Company, Inc. (1)Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Management, Inc. (1)            Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Municipal Services Group, Inc.
 (1) (2)                                 Imperial Bank             100%
Imperial Plan, Inc. (1)                  Imperial Bank             100%
TNT Mortgage Services, Inc. (1)          Imperial Bank             100%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
(1) Not currently active
(2) Previously known as Imperial Municipal Services Corporation
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 809

 892

 890

 969

 586

 992

 912

 550

 1,050

 816

 891

 767

 785

 875

 834

 811

 678

 649

 687

 733

 734

 745

 694

 600

 568

 592

 659

 731

 768

 771

 751

 421

 438

 451

 452

 455

 453

 454

 496

 524

 544

 530

 510

 539

 516

 495

 502

 501

 469

 485

 511

 539

 569

 518

 496

 504

 528

 527

 539

 592

 552

 606

 552

 606

 603

 603

 484

 709

 562

 527

 736

 584

 682

 599

 651

 714

 627

 669

 600

 533

 573

 610

 635

 650

 586

 523

 531

 560

 593

 611

 683

 645

 682

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 357

 391

 389

 389

 315

 454

 363

 342

 471

 377

 437

 386

 418

 457

 403

 429

 387

 345

 370

 393

 408

 418

 378

 339

 344

 362

 382

 394

 438

 415

 437

TOTAL 18,923

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL

A Professional Corporation
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Member of AICPA Division of Firms
Member of SECPS
Member of Summit International Associates

                                                                  (801) 532-2200
                                                              Fax (801) 532-7944
                                                    345 East Broadway, Suite 200
                         Salt Lake City, Utah 84111-2693

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders: Cofitras Entertainment, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cofitras  Entertainment,  Inc.
(a  development  stage  enterprise)  as of  December  31,  1998 and the  related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998.  These  financial  statements are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Cofitras Entertainment, Inc. as
of December  31, 1998 and the results of its  operations  and its cash flows for
the  year  ended  December  31,  1998  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted
accounting principles.

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have been  prepared  assuming that the
Company  will  continue  as a  going  concern.  As  discussed  in  Note 1 to the
financial  statements,  the Company's significant losses raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's  plans regarding
those  matters are also  described in Note 1. The  financial  statements  do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Salt Lake City, Utah
April 13, 1999

                                                       HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL

<PAGE>