alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT      OF 2002 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALL Fuels & Energy      Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008,      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,      Dean E. Sukowatey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 19, 2008. | ALL FUELS & ENERGY COMPANY |   |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|

| By: | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|-----|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. Sukowatey, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906      has been provided to ALL Fuels & Energy Company and will be retained      by ALL Fuels & Energy Company and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
(No. 73-CC-284

#### Frank Hubbard Electric Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, State Fair Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 26, 1973.*

Frank Hubbard Electric Company, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 183

 106

 88

 97

 97

 101

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 142

 142

 149

 150

 165

 183

 185

 179

 175

 172

 183

 189

 95

 73

 72

 78

 77

 79

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 128

 118

 117

 123

 134

 150

 152

 157

 158

 160

 162

 155

 114

 89

 80

 86

 85

 86

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 137

 131

 132

 137

 152

 161

 161

 163

 164

 164

 168

 167

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,678

 2,947

 2,534

 2,261

 2,052

 1,924

 1,746

 1,585

 1,390

 1,185

 978

 826

 672

 540

 426

 337

 257

 171

 86

 137

 268

 400

 537

 689

 850

 1,011

 1,174

 1,338

 1,502

 1,670

 1,837

 263

 211

 181

 162

 147

 137

 125

 113

 99

 85

 70

 59

 48

 39

 30

 24

 18

 12

 6

 10

 19

 29

 38

 49

 61

 72

 84

 96

 107

 119

 131

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 370.11 What requirements apply to a notice of proposed redesignation? ( a ) Prior to any redesignation of the agency that conducts the CAP, the Governor shall give written notice of the proposed redesignation to the designated agency, the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC), and the State Independent Living Council (SILC) and publish a public notice of the Governor's intention to redesignate. Both the notice to the designated agency, the SRC, and the SILC and the public notice must include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) The Federal requirements for the CAP (section 112 of the Act).
( 2 ) The goals and function of the CAP.
( 3 ) The name of the current designated agency.
( 4 ) A description of the current CAP and how it is administered.
( 5 ) The reason or reasons for proposing the redesignation, including why the Governor believes good cause exists for the proposed redesignation.
( 6 ) The effective date of the proposed redesignation.
( 7 ) The name of the agency the Governor proposes to administer the CAP.
( 8 ) A description of the system that the redesignated (*i.e.,* new) agency would administer.
( b ) The notice to the designated agency must— ( 1 ) Be given at least 30 days in advance of the Governor's written decision to redesignate; and
( 2 ) Advise the designated agency that it has at least 30 days from receipt of the notice of proposed redesignation to respond to the Governor and that the response must be in writing.
( c ) The notice of proposed redesignation must be published in a place and manner that provides the SRC, the SILC, individuals with disabilities or their representatives, and the public with at least 30 days to submit oral or written comments to the Governor.
( d ) Following public notice, public hearings concerning the proposed redesignation must be conducted in an accessible format that provides individuals with disabilities or their representatives an opportunity for comment. The Governor shall maintain a written public record of these hearings.
( e ) The Governor shall fully consider any public comments before issuing a written decision to redesignate.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 112(c)(1)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 732(c)(1)(B))
§ 81.37 Application for review of a disallowance decision. ( a ) If a recipient wishes to obtain review of a disallowance decision, the recipient shall file a written application for review with the Office of Administrative Law Judges, c/o Docket Clerk, Office of Hearings and Appeals, and, as required by § 81.12(b), shall serve a copy on the applicable Departmental official who made the disallowance decision.
( b ) A recipient shall file an application for review not later than 60 days after the date it receives the notice of a disallowance decision.
( c ) Within 10 days after receipt of a copy of the application for review, the authorized Departmental official who made the disallowance decision shall provide the ALJ with a copy of any document identified in the notice pursuant to § 81.34(b)(2).
( d ) An application for review must contain— ( 1 ) A copy of the disallowance decision of which review is sought;
( 2 ) A statement certifying the date the recipient received the notice of that decision;
( 3 ) A short and plain statement of the disputed issues of law and fact, the recipient's position with respect to these issues, and the disallowed funds the recipient contends need not be returned; and
( 4 ) A statement of the facts and the reasons that support the recipient's position.
( e ) The ALJ who considers a timely application for review that substantially complies with the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section may permit the recipient to supplement or amend the application with respect to issues that were timely raised. Any requirement to return funds that is not timely appealed becomes the final decision of the Department.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1234(f)(1), 1234a(b)(1), and 3474(a))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 58 FR 43473, 43474, Aug. 16, 1993; 58 FR 51013, Sept. 30, 1993; 60 FR 46494, Sept. 6, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.40 Qualification to alternate volatile fruit-flavor concentrate plant and bonded wine cellar. A proprietor of a volatile fruit-flavor concentrate plant operating a contiguous bonded wine cellar may alternate the use of each premise by extension and curtailment by filing with the appropriate TTB officer the following information: ( a ) TTB Form 27-G (5520.3) and TTB Form 5120.25 to cover the proposed alternation of premises;
( b ) A special diagram, in duplicate, delineating the premises as they will exist, both during extension and curtailment and clearly depicting all buildings, floors, rooms, areas, equipment and pipe lines (identified individually by letter or number) which are to be subject to alternation, in their relative operating sequence; and
( c ) A bond or a consent of surety to cover the proposed alternation of premises if the proprietor is required to hold a bond under § 24.146 of this chapter to cover the bonded wine cellar premises subject to alternation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1513-0006) [T.D. ATF-455, 66 FR 29482, May 31, 2001, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1119, Jan. 4, 2017]
### §742l–1. Authority to use available law enforcement funds

In fiscal year 2023 and hereafter of the amount available for law enforcement, up to $750,000, to remain available until expended, may at the discretion of the Secretary be used for payment for information, rewards, or evidence concerning violations of laws administered by the Service, and miscellaneous and emergency expenses of enforcement activity, authorized or approved by the Secretary and to be accounted for solely on the Secretary's certificate.

(Pub. L. 112–74, div. E, title I, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 988; Pub. L. 117–328, div. G, title I, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4765.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328 substituted "2023" for "2012" and "$750,000" for "$400,000".
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case 17-04206-KRH Doc 6 Filed 09/22/17 Entered 09/22/17 15:40:32 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
### §1313a. Appropriations for refunds, drawbacks, bounties, etc.

There are appropriated such amounts as hereafter may be necessary for refund or payment of custom collections or receipts, and payment of debentures or drawbacks, bounties, and allowances, as authorized by law.

(June 30, 1949, ch. 286, title I, 63 Stat. 360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Tariff Act of 1930 which comprises this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17994-17995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Nevada)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 19, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, May 19, 2011, at 2 p.m., Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. 
For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or write TAP Office,

[[Page 17995]]

915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7535 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 650

 627

 620

 628

 637

 637

 637

 644

 608

 628

 627

 638

 643

 652

 642

 671

 670

 658

 670

 660

 620

 632

 610

 582

 618

 652

 665

 652

 688

 0

 614

 589

 590

 575

 592

 597

 602

 583

 540

 575

 578

 583

 600

 589

 595

 600

 598

 526

 573

 550

 525

 487

 482

 503

 532

 564

 550

 550

 548

 0

 627

 617

 606

 607

 613

 620

 619

 610

 571

 591

 597

 602

 620

 620

 615

 627

 625

 588

 616

 600

 570

 557

 517

 531

 563

 588

 591

 581

 595

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 403

 397

 391

 391

 395

 399

 399

 393

 369

 381

 385

 388

 399

 399

 396

 403

 402

 379

 397

 387

 368

 360

 336

 344

 364

 379

 381

 375

 384

TOTAL 17,284

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,912

 4,429

 3,098

 3,098

 2,754

 2,525

 2,854

 1,848

 1,374

 1,059

 1,195

 1,105

 1,056

 1,031

 639

 496

 328

 564

 427

 465

 755

 1,392

 1,132

 1,165

 1,128

 1,260

 726

 524

 525

 443

 302

 523

 405

 323

 236

 231

 229

 233

 233

 257

 252

 241

 282

 260

 294

 286

 257

 253

 235

 206

 231

 217

 226

 249

 253

 267

 252

 255

 260

 245

 224

 233

 2,200

 1,796

 1,091

 899

 657

 561

 865

 458

 411

 389

 415

 406

 396

 407

 332

 311

 284

 285

 257

 259

 278

 403

 331

 361

 374

 364

 323

 319

 318

 277

 262

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 15,765

 16,722

 16,870

 17,200

 17,330

 17,373

 17,646

 17,350

 16,975

 16,306

 14,917

 13,650

 12,105

 10,951

 9,083

 7,598

 6,791

 6,177

 5,777

 5,475

 4,888

 4,833

 4,753

 4,725

 4,684

 4,642

 4,569

 4,481

 4,467

 4,433

 4,411

 1,126

 1,194

 1,205

 1,229

 1,238

 1,241

 1,260

 1,239

 1,213

 1,165

 1,066

 975

 865

 782

 649

 543

 485

 441

 413

 391

 349

 345

 340

 338

 335

 332

 326

 320

 319

 317

 315

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §2231. Assault or resistance

(a) Whoever forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, prevents, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person authorized to serve or execute search warrants or to make searches and seizures while engaged in the performance of his duties with regard thereto or on account of the performance of such duties, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and—

(b) Whoever, in committing any act in violation of this section, uses any deadly or dangerous weapon, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 802; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§121, 253, 254, 628 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §65, 35 Stat. 1100; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §18, 40 Stat. 230; May 18, 1934, ch. 299, §§1, 2, 48 Stat. 780, 781; Feb. 8, 1936, ch. 40, 49 Stat. 1105; June 26, 1936, ch. 830, title I, §3, 49 Stat. 1940; Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 Fed. Reg. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; June 13, 1940, ch. 359, 54 Stat. 391).

Section consolidates section 628 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and the portion of section 121 of said title relating to resistance of persons authorized to make searches.

Punishment provided by section 121 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was $2,000 fine and imprisonment for 1 year. Section 628 of said title was part of Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XIII, §1, 40 Stat. 231, prescribing fine of not more than $1,000 and imprisonment not exceeding 2 years for resisting service, execution of search warrant, or assaulting an officer.

Section 253 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., enumerated United States marshals, deputies, and assistants, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents, and numerous other officers, the killing of whom is denounced as a Federal offense.

Section 254 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., denounced the assaulting of such officers and prescribed punishment therefor without regard to nature of duties involved or performed.

In other words sections 253 and 254 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were not limited to officers executing search warrants.

Officers enumerated in section 253 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were substantially all those who serve or execute search warrants. Therefore, the language and punishment under section 254 of said title constitute basis of this revised section. No change in legislative intent is involved, as the amendments of sections 253 and 254 of said title are the latest enactments.

The provisions of section 121 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to rescue of property from seizing officer or its destruction to prevent seizure, are incorporated in sections 2232 and 2233 of this title.

Minor changes were made in translation and phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(K), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(L), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97000 / March 1, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19266

In the Matter of

Foundations Asset Management, 

LLC, Michael W. Shamburger, and 

Rob E. Wedel,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On May 9, 2022, the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, published 

a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1pursuant to 

Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s 

Rules”);2and simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”). 

The Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from 

the Commission’s public website, or by submitting a written request to Allison Moon, United 

States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5876. 

The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit 

their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received no 

comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On July 12, 2022, the Division of 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94877 (May 9, 2022).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order approving the Proposed Plan,3and 

posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”).

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accumulated interest, less 

taxes, fees, and expenses, to the harmed investors according to the methodology set forth in the 

Plan.

In accordance with the Plan, the Commission staff, in consultation with Krista L. Freitag, 

by and through E3 Realty Advisors, Inc. dba E3 Advisors (the “Third-Party”), has compiled the 

payee information and prepared a payment file in a Commission-approved format. The 

Commission staff has reviewed and accepted the payment file and requests, pursuant to Rule 

1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans,4that the 

Commission direct the payment of $298,273.61 from the Fair Fund to the account established at 

Western Alliance Bank (the “Bank”), in accordance with paragraph 48 of the Plan, for 

distribution by the Third-Party in accordance with the Plan.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the payment 

of $298,273.61 from the Fair Fund to the Bank for distribution by the Third-Party in accordance 

with the Plan.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.5

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 95255 (July 12, 2022).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6).

5

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).