alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  99.1

                       PARA MAS INTERNET, INC.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                      18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                       AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
             SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Para Mas Internet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Don McFadyen, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of1934;  and
(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Don McFadyen
---------------------------------------
Don McFadyen
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer
October 15,  2003

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Para Mas Internet, Inc. and will be retained by Para Mas
Internet,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.
### §952. Diplomatic codes and correspondence

Whoever, by virtue of his employment by the United States, obtains from another or has or has had custody of or access to, any official diplomatic code or any matter prepared in any such code, or which purports to have been prepared in any such code, and without authorization or competent authority, willfully publishes or furnishes to another any such code or matter, or any matter which was obtained while in the process of transmission between any foreign government and its diplomatic mission in the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 743; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 135 of title 22, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Foreign Relations and Intercourse (June 10, 1933, ch. 57, 48 Stat. 122).

Minor changes of phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
§ 363.6 What definitions apply? The following definitions apply to this part: ( a ) Definitions in 34 CFR part 361.
( b ) Definitions in 34 CFR part 77.
( c ) Definitions in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A.
(Authority: Sections 7 and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705 and 709(c))
#### Inez L. Samuel, Respondent, v. Sanford Samuel et al., Individually and as Executors of Moses Samuel, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### Lyman Cary, appellee, v. Kearney National Bank et al., Impleaded with Wallace A. Downing et al., appellants.

Filed October 18, 1899.

No. 8,958.

1. Appeal to Supreme Court. The right of appeal to this court is limited by statute to actions in equity.

2. Proceeding in Error: Action at Law. This court has no Jurisdiction of an action, purely legal in its nature, in which no petition in error has been seasonably filed.

Appeal from tbe district court of Buffalo county. Heard below before Greene, J.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*F. G. Earner,*for appellants.

W. *D. Oldham*and *Fred A. Eye, contra.*

Sullivan, J.

Lyman Cary, as treasurer of Buffalo county, recovered a judgment against tbe Kearney National Bank and *170others in an action based upon an alleged breach of the conditions of a depository bond. Two of the defendants, Downing and Allen, bring the record here for review. The action was purely legal in its nature, but no petition in error was seasonably filed, and no summons in error has ever been issued. The cause was docketed in this court as an appeal. The right of appeal is confined by the statute to actions in equity, and does not extend to actions at law. Under repeated decisions of this court, we are constrained to hold that we have no jurisdiction of the cause, and therefore direct that the proceeding be

Dismissed.
#### § 19.258 Additional tax on nonbeverage spirits.

The additional tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. 5001(a)(8), on imported spirits withdrawn from customs custody without payment of tax and later withdrawn from bonded premises for beverage purposes, and the related provisions of § 19.257, are not applicable to Puerto Rican or Virgin Islands spirits brought into the United States and transferred to bonded premises under the provisions of this part.

(26 U.S.C. 5201)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 1, 2014

p0924

Order 

Clerk

October 1, 2014

148645 & (17)(18)(23)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 148645

COA: 315188

Shiawassee CC: 01-007380-FH

DONALD LEE KISSNER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Shiawassee Circuit Court for 

further proceedings. The circuit court failed to provide the defendant with advice 

concerning his appellate rights at his original sentencing or at the sentencing following 

probation violation, as required under the court rules in effect at the time of his 

sentencing, MCR 6.425(E)(2) and MCR 6.445(H)(2), respectively. Upon remand, the 

court shall properly advise the defendant that he is entitled to file an application for leave 

to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the 

trial court, pursuant to the versions of MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429 in 

effect at the time of the defendant’s sentencing. We further note that because the 

defendant’s minimum sentence exceeded the upper limit of the sentencing guidelines 

range, he is entitled to an attorney under MCL 770.3a(2)(b), which was in effect at the 

time that the defendant was sentenced. In his application for leave to appeal or 

postconviction motion, the defendant may include among the issues raised those issues 

presented in his application for leave to appeal to this Court, but is not required to do so. 

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion to join 

dockets for hearing is DENIED. In light of this Court’s order, the motions for remand, 

appointment of counsel, and oral arguments are DENIED as moot.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Solar Enterprises, Inc. November 30, 2000 financial
                  statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.

</LEGEND>



<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        NOV-30-2000

<CASH>                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,000
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      1,121
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,121)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  0
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0




</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1264-19

D’WARREN LAMAR SIMMONS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S AND APPELLANT’S PETITIONS 

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM 

THE WACO COURT OF APPEALS

MCLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J.,

joined.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of assault family violence with a prior conviction for

assault family violence and sentenced to 75 years in prison. In the bill of costs, the trial

court assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee. See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE §
D’WARREN LAMAR SIMMONS - 2

133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as being

unconstitutional. Simmons v. State, No. 10-18-00269-CR (Tex. App. – Waco Nov. 27,

2019). 

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review arguing that the time

payment fee was prematurely assessed. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v.

State, Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim.

App. Mar. 31, 2021), in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed

prematurely because the pendency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. 

Accordingly, we grant ground one of the State’s petition for discretionary review,

vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of

Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s other ground is refused.

Appellant’s petition is also refused.

DATE DELIVERED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,464

 2,772

 2,389

 2,011

 1,902

 1,721

 1,724

 2,228

 2,909

 4,430

 3,354

 3,279

 2,800

 3,533

 3,077

 2,610

 2,086

 1,867

 1,951

 2,886

 2,570

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,078

 1,573

 1,863

 2,097

 2,156

 358

 339

 340

 339

 333

 329

 331

 356

 357

 367

 404

 431

 437

 451

 485

 370

 413

 318

 360

 372

 380

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 347

 342

 351

 366

 732

 719

 665

 647

 656

 605

 707

 755

 818

 1,138

 914

 769

 823

 929

 984

 891

 839

 705

 721

 909

 947

 0

 0

 0

 0

 554

 629

 666

 750

 808

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 10,763

 10,508

 10,003

 9,453

 9,181

 8,880

 8,830

 8,946

 9,168

 9,759

 10,093

 10,304

 10,565

 10,877

 11,129

 11,301

 11,475

 11,533

 11,598

 11,902

 12,142

 11,387

 10,569

 9,431

 8,517

 8,302

 8,108

 7,845

 7,611

 7,528

 769

 751

 715

 675

 656

 634

 631

 639

 655

 697

 721

 736

 755

 777

 795

 807

 820

 824

 828

 850

 867

 813

 755

 674

 608

 593

 579

 560

 544

 538

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of North American Van
Lines, Inc. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                    
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JOAN E. RYANJoan E. Ryan
Chief Financial Officer

November 21,
2003

---

QuickLinks
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | */s/ John Boschert*                             
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | John Boschert                                   
| | Title: | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
| |        | (Principal Accounting Officer)                  
| | Date:  | May 23, 2005                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.09

 1,198.21

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.31

 1,198.29

 1,199.36

 1,198.81

 1,198.94

 1,198.74

 1,198.62

 1,198.54

 1,198.49

 1,198.45

 1,198.43

 1,198.41

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 48.05

 48.26

 48.48

 48.48

 48.44

 48.41

 50.31

 49.33

 49.56

 49.20

 48.99

 48.85

 48.76

 48.69

 48.65

 48.62

 48.60

 48.58

 48.56

 48.55

 48.53

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

STORAGE

+0.21

+0.21

+0.21

+0.00

-0.04

-0.04

+1.91

-0.99

+0.23

-0.36

-0.21

-0.14

-0.09

-0.07

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.07

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

114

120

180

74

44

36

2,399

975

861

305

233

182

144

134

136

120

119

111

102

95

90

41

79

73

72

71

72

73

INFLOW

 0

 10

 71

 71

 59

 47

 1,429

 566

 738

 479

 337

 250

 201

 164

 147

 130

 122

 114

 107

 99

 92

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 7

 3

 2

 2

 2

 6

 8

 6

 6

 4

 2

 3

 5

 5

 6

 7

 5

 5

 3

 4

 6

 11

 13

 7

 6

 5

 6

 7

C.F.S.

 .13

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .11

 .13

 .11

 .10

 .07

 .04

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .09

 .08

 .06

 .07

 .10

 .19

 .22

 .13

 .11

 .09

 .10

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 1.52

 .00

 .83

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2015 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/09/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.58 7,055 28 5,688 152 2.66 2.39

ACRE-FEET +580 13,994 56 11,282 301

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 11,282

OUTLET

TOTAL

 56

 11,338

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.39

JULY 1, 2014 12.82

 47.84
### §460o–3. Administration authorities for conservation, management, or disposal of natural resources; coordination of administrative responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of the Army

In the administration of the area for the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary of the Interior may utilize such statutory authorities relating to areas of the national park system and such statutory authorities otherwise available to him for the conservation, management, or disposal of vegetative, mineral, or fish or wildlife resources as he deems appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. To assure consistent and effective planning, development, and operation for all purposes of the project, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall coordinate the administration of their respective responsibilities in the project; and such administration shall be consistent with the joint resolution approved September 27, 1961 (re Delaware River Basin compact; 75 Stat. 688).

(Pub. L. 89–158, §4, Sept. 1, 1965, 79 Stat. 613.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.41

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.49

 1,198.45

 1,198.41

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.35

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.31

 1,198.37

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 1,198.32

 48.62

 48.58

 48.56

 48.55

 48.53

 48.76

 48.69

 48.62

 48.58

 48.56

 48.55

 48.53

 48.51

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

 48.44

 48.44

 48.44

 48.55

 48.55

 48.53

 48.49

 48.48

 48.46

 48.46

 48.46

STORAGE

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.23

-0.07

-0.07

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.11

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

115

100

102

93

86

319

131

97

100

102

93

86

79

49

75

75

77

62

70

71

56

65

63

154

101

85

65

66

60

69

71

INFLOW

 130

 114

 107

 99

 92

 201

 164

 130

 114

 107

 99

 92

 85

 71

 71

 71

 71

 65

 65

 65

 59

 59

 59

 99

 99

 92

 78

 71

 65

 65

 65

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 4

 3

 3

 5

 5

 4

 5

 5

 5

 3

 1

 1

 1

 4

 3

 3

 3

 5

C.F.S.

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .09

 .08

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .06

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .85

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .65

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/29/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.24 2,837 31 2,824 92 1.62 1.50

ACRE-FEET -240 5,627 61 5,601 182

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 5,601

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 5,662

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.50

JULY 1, 2012 12.03

 48.65
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a joint Open Meeting with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Thursday, October 22, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:**  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:**  This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via audio webcast only on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. 

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**  At the joint open meeting, the Commissions will consider whether to adopt rule amendments to lower the margin requirement for an unhedged security futures position from 20% to 15% and adopt certain conforming revisions to the security futures margin offset table.

At the meeting, the Commissions also will consider whether to issue a request for comment on the portfolio margining of uncleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps. The request for comment would solicit comment on all aspects of the portfolio margining of uncleared swaps, non-cleared security-based swaps, and related positions, including on the merits, benefits, and risks of portfolio margining these types of positions, and on any regulatory, legal, and operational issues associated with portfolio margining them.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated:  October 15, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary