alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.42

 1,198.41

 1,198.40

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.36

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.35

 1,198.35

 1,198.35

 1,198.34

 1,198.34

 1,198.33

 1,198.33

 1,198.32

 1,198.25

 1,198.20

 1,198.18

 1,198.16

 1,198.15

 1,198.16

 1,198.16

 1,198.16

 1,198.15

 1,198.15

 1,198.15

 1,198.15

 48.63

 48.62

 48.60

 48.60

 48.58

 48.56

 48.53

 48.48

 48.48

 48.48

 48.51

 48.51

 48.51

 48.49

 48.49

 48.48

 48.48

 48.46

 48.33

 48.25

 48.21

 48.18

 48.16

 48.18

 48.18

 48.18

 48.16

 48.16

 48.16

 48.16

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.05

+0.00

+0.00

+0.04

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.12

-0.09

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

CHANGE

141

6

5

13

5

15

-2

-13

19

15

33

19

18

6

79

74

82

67

-24

-23

0

2

9

25

18

21

7

10

13

14

INFLOW

 138

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 78

 71

 71

 65

 27

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 11

 14

 13

 12

 13

 23

 15

 13

 18

 14

 14

 18

 17

 14

 0

 11

 10

 10

 10

 14

 17

 19

 17

 15

 17

 20

 15

 9

 12

 13

C.F.S.

 .20

 .25

 .22

 .21

 .22

 .40

 .26

 .22

 .32

 .25

 .25

 .32

 .30

 .25

 .00

 .20

 .18

 .18

 .18

 .25

 .29

 .33

 .29

 .27

 .30

 .35

 .27

 .15

 .21

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/23/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.52 654 30 456 418 7.35 .00

ACRE-FEET -520 1,297 60 904 829

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 904

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 964

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2018 25.04

 48.65

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 25.04
all_density.xls 5/2/00 9:10 AM

Delta Smelt Salvage

2000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

3/15/00 3/20/00 3/25/00 3/30/00 4/4/00 4/9/00 4/14/00 4/19/00 4/24/00 4/29/00

Salvage

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Pumping X 100 af

14-Day Avg SWP Salvage CVP Salvage SWP Pumping Total Pumping
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18551-18552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Determination of Insufficient Assets To Satisfy Claims Against 
Financial Institution in Receivership

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FDIC has determined that insufficient assets exist in the 
receivership of Miami Valley Bank, Lakeview, Ohio, to make any 
distribution to general unsecured claims, and therefore such claims 
will recover nothing and have no value.

DATES: The FDIC made its determination on March 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions regarding this 
notice, you may contact an FDIC Claims Agent at (972) 761-8677. Written 
correspondence may also be mailed to FDIC as Receiver of Miami Valley 
Bank, Attention: Claims Agent, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    On October 4, 2007, Miami Valley Bank, Lakeview, Ohio, (FIN 
<greek-i>10002) was closed by the Department of Financial Institutions 
for the State of Ohio, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
(``FDIC'') was appointed as its receiver (``Receiver''). In complying 
with its statutory duty to resolve the institution in the method that 
is least costly to the deposit insurance fund, see 12 U.S.C. 
1823(c)(4)), the FDIC facilitated a transaction with The Citizens 
Banking Company, Sandusky, Ohio, to assume the insured deposits of the 
failed institution, while retaining the remaining assets of the bank 
for later disposition.
    Section 11(d)(11)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 
U.S.C. 1821(d)(11)(A), sets forth the order of priority for 
distribution of amounts realized from the liquidation or other 
resolution of an insured depository

[[Page 18552]]

institution to pay claims. Under the statutory order of priority, 
administrative expenses and deposit liabilities must be paid in full 
before any distribution may be made to general unsecured creditors or 
any lower priority claims.
    As of December 31, 2010, the value of assets available for 
distribution by the Receiver, together with all expected recovery 
sources, was $14,671,702. As of the same date, administrative expenses 
and depositor liabilities equaled $41,374,312, exceeding available 
assets by at least $26,702,610. Accordingly, the FDIC has determined 
that insufficient assets exist to make any distribution on general 
unsecured creditor claims (and any lower priority claims) and therefore 
all such claims, asserted or unasserted, will recover nothing and have 
no value.

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7797 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
§ 694.20 When may a GEAR UP grantee provide services to students attending an institution of higher education? ( a ) The Secretary authorizes an eligible State or Partnership to provide GEAR UP services to students attending an institution of higher education if the State or Partnership— ( 1 ) Applies for and receives a new GEAR UP award after August 14, 2008, and
( 2 ) In its application, requested a seventh year so that it may continue to provide services to students through their first year of attendance at an institution of higher education.
( b ) A State grantee that uses a priority (rather than or in addition to a cohort) approach to identify participating students may, consistent with its approved application and at any time during the project period, provide services to students during their first year of attendance at an institution of higher education, provided that the grantee continues to provide all required services throughout the Federal budget period to GEAR UP students still enrolled in a local educational agency.
( c ) If a grantee is awarded a seven year grant, consistent with the grantee's approved application, during the seventh year of the grant the grantee— ( 1 ) Must provide services to students in their first year of attendance at an institution of higher education; and
( 2 ) May choose to provide services to high school students who have yet to graduate.
( d ) Grantees that continue to provide services under this part to students through their first year of attendance at an institution of higher education must, to the extent practicable, coordinate with other campus programs, including academic support services to enhance, not duplicate service.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-21(b)(2))
[75 FR 65801, Oct. 26, 2010]
#### STEPHAN, Appellant, v. THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent.

(268 N. W. 617.)

(File No. 7956.

Opinion filed November 16, 1936.)

*B. B. Skinner*and *B. C. Sigler,*both of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Boyce, Warren & Pairbank,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

PER 'CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order terminating an extended period of redemption from a mortgage foreclosure. The redemption period was extended under the provisions of chapter 178, Laws 1935. Respondent in its brief sets forth, and the order appealed from states, that at the hearing which culminated in the order appealed from, certain evidence was introduced. This evidence is not made a part of the record on appeal. After the filing of respondent’s brief, appellant moved1 that the record be remanded that it might be properly settled by the trial court. From the record it appears that none of the testimony given at the hearing was taken by a reporter, and no record *631thereof was kept. In Schurman v. Schurman, 60 S. D. 489, 245 N. W. 39, this court outlined the procedure to be followed necessary to settle the recordl in appealing from an order. Clearly, under the rules announced in that case, there would be no object in remanding this record in view of the fact that no record was kept of the testimony -given at the hearing.

Appellant contends that the court was without jurisdiction to enter the order terminating -the extended period of redemption. Under the provisions of section 7 of said chapter 178, Laws 1935, this contention is without merit. That section provides that “the Court in all cases reserves jurisdiction to alter, modify or entirely revoke the order made.”

W'e are of the opinion that the order was entered upon a proper application, and that the said order should be in all things affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARHAWN JONES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 389 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 Day Accum Mean 14 Day Avg Mean

1 160 144 150 2,329 166

2 168 139 152 2,298 164

3 165 143 155 2,275 163

4 166 137 154 2,250 161

5 190 137 162 2,222 159

6 197 141 167 2,205 158

7 185 152 168 2,201 157

8 180 153 167 2,198 157

9 179 154 165 2,198 157

10 0 0 0 2,043 146

11 162 145 151 2,045 146

12 167 145 154 2,048 146

13 166 148 156 2,051 147

14 171 151 163 2,064 147

15 181 159 170 2,084 149

16 186 159 166 2,098 150

17 168 153 159 2,102 150

18 186 151 159 2,107 151

19 183 149 163 2,108 151

20 171 150 164 2,105 150

21 174 158 164 2,101 150

22 178 159 165 2,099 150

23 165 160 162 2,096 150

24 182 161 164 2,260 161

25 173 161 164 2,273 162

26 166 160 163 2,282 163

27 164 157 161 2,287 163

28 165 152 157 2,281 163

29 159 144 151 2,262 162

30 165 146 153 2,249 161

31 162 143 150 2,240 160

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Top On The Sacramento River 

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Lizabeth M. Wolfson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/  Lizabeth M. Wolfson
_______________________
Chief Financial Officer
January 12, 2004





<PAGE>


[00000-0000/DOCUMENT.01]	-5-	10/6/98


[00000-0000/DOCUMENT.01]		10/6/98
Exhibit 31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Peter D. Ubaldi, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Homeland Security Network, Inc. a Nevada corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. /s/ Peter D. UbaldiPeter D. UbaldiChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: April115, 2007
(No. 00041

#### Gloria Freeman as wife of Richard Freeman, deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 30, 1973.*

Gloria Freeman, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim was filed pursuant to *Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et. seq., Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971,*"Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”. The Court is in receipt of the Application for Benefits and Statement of Supervising Officer, as well as an investigative report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office. Based upon these documents, the Court finds as follows:

That the claimant, Gloria Freeman, is the wife of the decedent and is the named beneficiary under the Application for Benefits. That the decedent, Richard Freeman was a volunteer fireman with the Village of *520Palatine Fire Department, engaged in the scope of his duty on February 23, 1973, within the meaning of Section 282 of the aforecited act. On said date, Fireman Freeman was summoned to a fire at the Ben Franklin Store in Palatine, owned by John Wilson, (Court of Claims No. 00040) also a volunteer fireman with the Palatine Fire Department. Wilson stated that there was a small fire in the basement and Firefighters Freeman, Wilson and Warren Ahlgrim (Court of Claims No. 00039) proceeded to the basement equipped with a hose line and wearing facial air packs. The fire mushroomed, the smoke became intense and efforts to reach the three firefighters in the basement were unsuccessful. After the smoke subsided Firefighter Freeman was found unconcious in the basement. 20 to 25 minutes had elapsed during the firefighting activity and active breathing had depleted the air supply in the air packs. Firefighter Freeman died on February 23,1973, and the toxicologists report indicates that an analysis of the blood showed that the "hemoglobin was saturated with 79% carbon monoxide”. The coroner’s physician related that "there are full thickness burns involving the face and forehead. There is some soot-staining of the face. There are no marks of external violence or trauma.” The cause of death is recited as "smoke inhalation”. The Court further finds that the Attorney General’s office in its investigation had determined that this claim is within the scope of the above cited statutes:

> "Section 282[e] 'killed in the line of duty’ means losing one’s life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer or fireman if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause. . . .”

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be, and the same hereby is, *521granted to Gloria Freeman as wife and next of kin of the decedent Richard Freeman.
#### § 84.665 State.

*State* means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
12/2/2021

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily 

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acr

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 803 987 364 

2-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 801 1,069 532 

3-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 803 1,032 455 

4-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 803 986 364 

5-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 802 1,032 455 

6-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 817 1,047 455 

7-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 804 1,033 455 

8-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 804 1,034 455 

9-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 803 1,078 546 

10-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 803 1,033 455 

11-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 802 1,031 455 

12-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 802 1,031 455 

13-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 800 1,029 455 

14-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 798 1,027 455 

15-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 799 1,028 455 

16-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 802 1,037 467 

17-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 804 1,040 467 

18-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 805 1,080 546 

19-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 804 1,079 546 

20-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 924 1,199 546 

21-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 987 1,262 546 

22-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 987 1,262 546 

23-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 271 990 1,260 537 

24-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 282 986 1,268 560 

25-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 985 1,215 455 

26-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 977 1,206 455 

27-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 838 1,068 455 

28-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 992 1,222 455 

29-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 994 1,223 455 

30-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 996 1,226 455 

31-Aug-21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 1,000 1,275 546 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 7,486 26,913 34,398 14,848 5

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

AUGUST 2021

Tra

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
#### § 299.10 Ombudsman.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70344, Aug. 29, 2024.

To help ensure equity for eligible private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel, an SEA must direct the ombudsman designated under section 1117 of the ESEA and § 200.68 to monitor and enforce the requirements in §§ 299.5 through 299.9.

[84 FR 31679, July 2, 2019]
### Part 5—Congressional Procedures With Respect to Presidential Actions
§ 76.671 Notice by the Secretary. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Before taking any final action to implement a bypass under a program listed in § 76.670, the Secretary provides the affected grantee and subgrantee, if appropriate, with written notice.
( b ) In the written notice, the Secretary— ( 1 ) States the reasons for the proposed bypass in sufficient detail to allow the grantee and subgrantee to respond;
( 2 ) Cites the requirement that is the basis for the alleged failure to comply; and
( 3 ) Advises the grantee and subgrantee that they— ( i ) Have at least 45 days after receiving the written notice to submit written objections to the proposed bypass; and
( ii ) May request in writing the opportunity for a hearing to show cause why the bypass should not be implemented.
( c ) The Secretary sends the notice to the grantee and subgrantee by certified mail with return receipt requested.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 2727(b)(4)(A), 2972(h)(1), 2990(c), 3223(c))
[54 FR 21775, May 19, 1989]
§ 75.159 Effect of State comments or failure to comment. ( a ) The Secretary considers those comments of the State that relate to: ( 1 ) Any selection criterion that applies under the program; or
( 2 ) Any other matter that affects the selection of projects for funding under the program.
( b ) If the State fails to comment on an application on or before the deadline date for the appropriate program, the State waives its right to comment.
( c ) If the applicant does not give the State an opportunity to comment, the Secretary does not select that project for a grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)