alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                           CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture
Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 15, 2003

/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
------------------------
Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5001 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5001

  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2019

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Non-Judicial Foreclosure Debt 
Collection Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS.

    Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 
1692a(6)) is amended by striking ``For the purpose of section 808(6), 
such term also includes any person who uses any instrumentality of 
interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose 
of which is the enforcement of security interests.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 203

 209

 232

 249

 255

 282

 281

 286

 278

 279

 286

 246

 254

 235

 244

 245

 253

 231

 283

 302

 320

 311

 316

 320

 324

 307

 289

 275

 269

 263

 270

 151

 153

 158

 161

 164

 162

 162

 160

 160

 154

 159

 162

 165

 170

 175

 177

 174

 196

 211

 206

 215

 212

 217

 208

 210

 209

 203

 187

 193

 203

 218

 180

 178

 181

 185

 184

 188

 191

 188

 194

 191

 191

 187

 193

 193

 197

 198

 196

 207

 235

 236

 247

 246

 254

 254

 257

 256

 243

 226

 222

 226

 236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 127

 126

 128

 130

 130

 132

 134

 132

 136

 134

 134

 132

 135

 135

 138

 138

 137

 144

 161

 162

 169

 168

 173

 173

 175

 174

 166

 156

 153

 156

 162

TOTAL 6,560

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, JonathanH.Chou, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of American Dairy,
Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over the
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  March 30,
      2009
                  /s/ JonathanH.ChouJonathanH.Chou, Chief Financial
      Officer
                    (Principal Accounting and
      Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 233

 231

 234

 232

 229

 238

 243

 242

 251

 260

 291

 314

 323

 313

 309

 236

 242

 253

 281

 284

 315

 294

 223

 221

 223

 224

 226

 216

 211

 219

 207

 208

 210

 203

 203

 206

 207

 204

 205

 199

 198

 196

 197

 198

 196

 194

 192

 196

 206

 196

 212

 198

 188

 192

 197

 198

 193

 195

 190

 186

 220

 218

 223

 216

 216

 222

 226

 222

 224

 227

 229

 234

 245

 250

 230

 210

 213

 216

 231

 225

 258

 239

 208

 210

 213

 213

 213

 209

 203

 205

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 152

 151

 154

 149

 149

 153

 156

 153

 154

 156

 158

 161

 167

 171

 158

 146

 148

 149

 159

 155

 175

 164

 145

 146

 148

 148

 148

 145

 141

 143

TOTAL 6,668

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 944

 1,135

 699

 468

 925

 1,430

 2,313

 2,204

 1,938

 1,872

 1,495

 1,858

 1,704

 1,999

 1,898

 2,153

 2,632

 4,127

 3,506

 3,484

 3,801

 4,047

 3,960

 3,521

 2,777

 2,478

 2,332

 2,900

 2,633

 2,476

 2,598

 231

 221

 203

 189

 192

 195

 209

 240

 281

 284

 307

 291

 307

 296

 278

 246

 241

 263

 313

 362

 375

 368

 435

 462

 469

 426

 325

 393

 366

 314

 327

 403

 401

 309

 236

 284

 387

 574

 613

 559

 574

 537

 515

 526

 600

 671

 501

 729

 1,188

 996

 1,143

 1,318

 1,578

 1,738

 1,390

 1,216

 993

 1,046

 1,119

 989

 851

 861

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,650

 5,663

 5,603

 5,415

 5,278

 5,210

 5,267

 5,441

 5,558

 5,749

 5,900

 6,097

 6,270

 6,518

 6,786

 6,886

 7,306

 8,258

 8,970

 9,726

 10,470

 11,435

 12,614

 13,430

 14,109

 14,587

 15,107

 15,626

 15,944

 16,294

 16,426

 404

 405

 400

 387

 377

 372

 376

 389

 397

 411

 421

 436

 448

 466

 485

 492

 522

 590

 641

 695

 748

 817

 901

 959

 1,008

 1,042

 1,079

 1,116

 1,139

 1,164

 1,173

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re:

Bluepoint Medical Associates, LLC

Debtor.

Case No. 19-13121-KHK

Chapter 11

ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED HEARING

THIS CASE came on :LVWHULD//&
VMotion for an Expedited Hearing (Docket 

No. 39) on their Motion for Relief from Stay (Docket No. 38). Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Motion for an Expedited Hearing (Docket No. 39) is GRANTED, and a hearing

will be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 11:00am, in Courtroom III, United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 200 South Washington Street, Alexandria, 

Virginia 22314.

2. The movant shall immediately give notice by the quickest means to all affected

parties. Notice may be electronic, by facsimile, telephonic, hand-delivery, or other means 

reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the affected parties.

3. Any objections may be made orally at the hearing.

4. The Clerk shall mail copies of this Order or give electronic notice of its entry, to the

parties listed below. 

Date: __________________

Klinette H. Kindred

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Copy electronically to:

John &Morgan

Oct 30 2019

/s/ Klinette H Kindred

Entered on Docket: October 30, 2019

Case 19-13121-KHK Doc 52 Filed 10/30/19 Entered 10/30/19 10:46:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
! " #  $%&'())'*+

	 



"
,	



	
 !
"


"!# $"!#
# 

%#&'('
'')	$

-- -

	 #
*+,-./'

	 &


"	'

+0! "!	 # 

0 "0!



"#
'

	 1"



#  

#0##0  #

	
! 


 '1"



#

	'

2	+0!!! 


3 #!"/ 4!(!*

+')52'

67777777777777 77777777777777777777777777

&(89
 :!



/* 96777777777777777777

,96

	
	
						

	
	



			

				

 !"
#	$	%%&	

$	'(

)*+	,&--


	


(.*0

;;8"

1
'8


<!412

Mar 30 2018 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

Mar 30 2018

Case 17-33729-KLP Doc 32 Filed 03/30/18 Entered 03/30/18 14:02:59 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 681.6 Who is an eligible nonstudent borrower? To receive a HEAL loan, a person who is not a student must satisfy all of the following requirements: ( a ) He or she must have received a HEAL loan prior to August 13, 1981, for which he or she is required to make payments of interest, but not principal, during the period for which the new loan is intended. This may be the grace period or a period of internship, residency, or deferment.
( b ) He or she must continue to meet the citizenship, nationality, or residency qualifications required of student borrowers.
( c ) He or she must agree that all funds received under the proposed loan will be used solely for payment of currently accruing interest on HEAL loans and the HEAL insurance premium.
( d ) If required under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act to present himself for and submit to registration under such section, he must have presented himself and submitted to registration under such section.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Racing Capital, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    August 31, 2006           By:     /s/ A. Robert Koveleski
                                           -------------------------------------
                                   Name:   A. Robert Koveleski
                                   Title:  Interim Principal Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital,
Inc. and will be retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LUTHER T. GOLDSMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (CR-01-29)

Submitted: August 4, 2006 Decided: August 15, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther T. Goldsmith, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Luther T. Goldsmith appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Goldsmith’s

§ 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Goldsmith, No. CR-01-29 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1752. Entry of articles for fairs

Any article imported or brought into the United States—

(1) which is in continuous customs custody, covered by a customs exhibition bond, or in a foreign trade zone, and

(2) on which no duty or internal-revenue tax has been paid,

may, without payment of any duty or internal-revenue tax, be entered under bond under this section for the purpose of exhibition at a fair, or for use in constructing, installing, or maintaining foreign exhibits at a fair.

(Pub. L. 86–14, §3, Apr. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 18.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Immunity From Seizure Under Judicial Process of Cultural Objects Imported for Temporary Exhibition or Display

Presidential determination of cultural significance of objects and exhibition or display thereof in the national interest, see section 2459 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
§ 602.11 Geographic area of accrediting activities. The agency must demonstrate that it conducts accrediting activities within— ( a ) A State, if the agency is part of a State government;
( b ) A region or group of States chosen by the agency in which an agency provides accreditation to a main campus, a branch campus, or an additional location of an institution. An agency whose geographic area includes a State in which a branch campus or additional location is located is not required to also accredit a main campus in that State. An agency whose geographic area includes a State in which only a branch campus or additional location is located is not required to accept an application for accreditation from other institutions in such State; or
( c ) The United States.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)
[84 FR 58918, Nov. 1, 2019]
Order entered March 27, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00722 - CR MELVIN BERNARD GOODE N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Crim inal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 17 - 70898 - I



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s March 21, 2019 motion to extend time to file appellant’s amended brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s amended brief filed b y April 5, 2019

.
/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
#### §§ 245a.23-245a.29 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 297

 259

 279

 280

 260

 249

 252

 266

 267

 248

 234

 244

 229

 228

 231

 228

 228

 223

 218

 197

 202

 195

 184

 179

 189

 186

 186

 164

 170

 197

 200

 183

 179

 177

 172

 164

 160

 171

 184

 184

 184

 184

 170

 170

 166

 163

 165

 165

 155

 148

 156

 158

 136

 146

 131

 134

 141

 135

 147

 172

 237

 218

 224

 223

 217

 212

 198

 203

 212

 203

 208

 210

 198

 194

 195

 191

 192

 190

 183

 176

 181

 178

 160

 158

 154

 154

 155

 154

 162

 185

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 162

 151

 154

 154

 150

 147

 138

 141

 147

 141

 145

 146

 138

 136

 137

 134

 135

 133

 129

 125

 128

 126

 115

 114

 111

 111

 112

 111

 116

 130

TOTAL 5,725

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 5b.8 Appeals of refusals to correct or amend records. ( a ) *Processing the appeal.* ( 1 ) A subject individual who disagrees with a refusal to correct or amend his record may appeal the refusal in writing. All appeals shall be made to the Secretary.
( 2 ) An appeal will be completed within 30 working days from its receipt by the appeal authority; *except that,* the appeal authority may for good cause extend this period for an additional 30 days. Should the appeal period be extended, the subject individual appealing the refusal to correct or amend the record will be informed in writing of the extension and the circumstances of the delay. The subject individual's request to amend or correct the record, the responsible Department official's refusal to correct or amend, and any other pertinent material relating to the appeal will be reviewed. No hearing will be held.
( 3 ) If the appeal authority agrees that the record subject to the appeal should be corrected or amended, the record will be amended and the subject individual will be informed in writing of the correction or amendment. Where an accounting was made of prior disclosures of the record, all previous recipients of the record will be informed of the corrective action taken.
( 4 ) If the appeal is denied, the subject individual will be informed in writing: ( i ) Of the denial and the reasons for the denial;
( ii ) That he has a right to seek judicial review of the denial; and,
( iii ) That he may submit to the responsible Department official a concise statement of disagreement to be associated with the disputed record and disclosed whenever the record is disclosed.
( b ) *Notation and disclosure of disputed records.* Whenever a subject individual submits a statement of disagreement to the responsible Department official in accordance with paragraph (a)(4)(iii) of this section, the record will be noted to indicate that it is disputed. In any subsequent disclosure, a copy of the subject individual's statement of disagreement, will be disclosed with the record. If the responsible Department official deems it appropriate, a concise statement of the appeal authority's reasons for denying the subject individual's appeal may also be disclosed with the record. While the subject individual will have access to this statement of reasons, such statement will not be subject to correction or amendment. Where an accounting was made of prior disclosures of the record, all previous recipients of the record will be provided a copy of the subject individual's statement of disagreement, as well as the statement, if any, of the appeal authority's reasons for denying the subject individual's appeal.