alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William Schosek, Respondent, against Certain-Teed Products Corporation et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

This is an appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision' and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of the father, mother, two minor sisters and a minor brother of the deceased employee. The dependency of the father is the sole issue raised. The deceased was twenty-five years of age and was engaged as an employee in the manufacture of gypsum products. On November 9,' 1946, while working in a mine in the regular course of his employment, he was struck by a rock which fell from the ceiling and sustained accidental injuries in the nature of a crushed head and death resulted immediately. The father of decedent, because of illness, was unable to perform his regular work as a coremaker. He had been ill and under the doctor’s care for the last five or six years suffering from circulatory asthenia characterized by vacillating blood pressure and great weakness. His average earnings amounted to $15.86 a week. The deceased son’s average weekly wage was $67, and his net take-home pay was $55 a week. He contributed to the support of his family $25 a week and purchased groceries to the amount of $4 or $5 each week. The expenses necessary for the maintenance of the home and food amounted to approximately $1,716 a year. After the death of the son, the father and his family were reduced to a standard of living lower than the standard to which they were accustomed prior thereto. *(Matter of Horn*V. *Curtiss-Wright Gorp.,*271 App. Div. 1033, affd. 297 N. Y. 667.) The board found that the father and his family were dependent on the deceased employee at the time of his death. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.
#### § 692.80 How does a State administer its community service work-study program?

When administering its community service work-study program, a State must follow the provisions in § 692.30, other than the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of that section.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-3a)
No. 16,105.

#### Ballew *v.*Hartman et al.

(196 P. [2d] 870)

Decided August 9, 1948.

Mr. Walter H. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Clarence O. *Moore, for*defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Hays

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought by defendants in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as plaintiffs, allegedly constituting a nominating committee and a committee to fill vacancies of the Progressive Party, pursuant to section *477203, chapter 59, ’35 C.S.A., to compel plaintiff in error, as clerk of the town of Rangely, to place upon the ballot at the town election to be held April 6, 1948, the names of certain candidates mentioned in the complaint for the various offices of said town.

Before the matter came on for trial, the defendant had printed said ballots containing the names of the respective candidates thereon and designated said candidates as representing the “independent progressive ticket.” The plaintiffs thereupon amended the complaint by reciting the above, and asked that the word “independent” be deleted from said ballots.

The trial court found for plaintiffs, ordered the word “independent” stricken from the ballot, and awarded the plaintiffs attorney, fees in the sum of $250.00, which judgment is here for review on writ of error.

The procedure for nominating candidates other than by convention is set forth in section 73, chapter 59, ’35 C.S.A., as amended by chapter 124, ’41 S.L., as amended by chapter 2, ’44 S.L., page 25, which, insofar as pertinent, provides for the filing with the city clerk a certificate of nomination, and that: “Each voter signing a certificate shall add to his signature his place of residence, and all shall, before an officer duly authorized to administer the same acknowledge his signature and make oath by affidavit thereto attached that he is a voter within and for the political division for which such nomination is made, and has truly stated his residence. $ $ $ h

In the instant case no affidavit was made as required by the mandatory provisions of the statute; consequently, the alleged certificate of nomination is void and of no force or effect, and no duty rested upon defendant as town clerk to file same or place the names of said candidates mentioned therein upon the ballot. *Cowie, Secretary of State v. Means,*39 Colo. 1, 88 Pac. 485; *478
      *Stephen, Chairman of the Republican Party Central Committee et al. v. Lail et al.,*80 Colo. 49, 248 Pac. 1012.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint.

Mr. Justice Hilliard not participating.
#### J. L. Emil Schueler, Appellant, v. Mary Louise Dooley, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,413

 2,320

 2,061

 2,257

 2,957

 3,369

 3,282

 3,116

 3,112

 3,634

 3,934

 3,414

 3,206

 4,205

 4,575

 6,076

 6,786

 6,003

 5,181

 4,436

 4,851

 4,698

 4,252

 4,610

 3,243

 2,030

 594

 452

 989

 1,200

 554

 303

 285

 313

 303

 322

 386

 441

 440

 526

 415

 422

 488

 504

 418

 388

 519

 725

 383

 298

 275

 284

 316

 324

 294

 475

 315

 344

 308

 319

 330

 288

 1,194

 685

 536

 597

 765

 1,033

 1,122

 1,074

 1,162

 1,458

 1,556

 1,280

 1,317

 2,105

 2,385

 3,206

 3,215

 2,351

 1,648

 1,164

 1,310

 1,373

 1,331

 1,558

 1,128

 750

 441

 366

 402

 416

 350

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 65,881

 61,128

 56,120

 50,964

 45,587

 40,215

 35,366

 30,940

 27,254

 24,532

 22,176

 19,506

 16,154

 15,884

 17,075

 19,596

 22,275

 24,029

 24,912

 25,043

 25,231

 25,530

 25,699

 25,799

 25,371

 24,841

 23,965

 22,226

 20,243

 17,453

 14,588

 4,706

 4,366

 4,009

 3,640

 3,256

 2,873

 2,526

 2,210

 1,947

 1,752

 1,584

 1,393

 1,154

 1,135

 1,220

 1,400

 1,591

 1,716

 1,779

 1,789

 1,802

 1,824

 1,836

 1,843

 1,812

 1,774

 1,712

 1,588

 1,446

 1,247

 1,042

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 6359

#### Phillips Petroleum Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 28, 1972.*

Phillips Petroleum Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
MARVIN M. SCOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5053

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mallory D. Cooper , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David Alan Henson, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., BENTON and ROBERTS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
§ 645.41 What are unallowable costs? Costs that may not be charged against a grant under this program include the following: ( a ) Research not directly related to the evaluation or improvement of the project.
( b ) Meals for staff except as provided in § 645.40 (d) and (m) and in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Room and board for administrative and instructional staff personnel who do not have responsibility for dormitory supervision of project participants during a residential summer component unless these costs are approved by the Secretary.
( d ) Room and board for participants in Veterans Upward Bound projects.
( e ) Construction, renovation or remodeling of any facilities.
( f ) Tuition, stipends, or any other form of student financial aid for project staff beyond that provided to employees of the grantee as part of its regular fringe benefit package.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-13)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit 
Applications

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII.............................   13738-000
FFP Missouri 6, LLC.........................................   13761-000
Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC..................................   13770-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 24, 2011, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. FFP Missouri 6, LLC......................................   13761-000
2. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII..........................   13738-000
3. Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC...............................   13770-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7850 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          75,961
<SECURITIES>                                    33,911
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,852
<PP&E>                                           6,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,117
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.74)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 231

 230

 210

 223

 216

 257

 322

 304

 256

 216

 307

 201

 206

 213

 196

 259

 317

 314

 436

 362

 412

 478

 353

 240

 0

 188

 211

 197

 201

 213

 194

 192

 189

 178

 176

 179

 182

 183

 175

 170

 167

 168

 168

 171

 168

 165

 166

 173

 181

 193

 202

 209

 197

 189

 0

 178

 173

 170

 170

 169

 205

 205

 197

 191

 187

 202

 212

 212

 197

 189

 199

 180

 179

 179

 175

 177

 189

 201

 221

 237

 256

 282

 238

 216

 0

 181

 185

 181

 181

 179

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,974

 2,983

 2,980

 2,974

 2,961

 2,952

 2,941

 2,903

 2,860

 2,814

 2,805

 2,780

 2,756

 2,734

 2,704

 2,676

 2,668

 2,678

 2,712

 2,747

 2,791

 2,861

 2,902

 2,929

 2,730

 2,731

 2,737

 2,739

 2,745

 2,747

 212

 213

 213

 212

 212

 211

 210

 207

 204

 201

 200

 199

 197

 195

 193

 191

 191

 191

 194

 196

 199

 204

 207

 209

 195

 195

 196

 196

 196

 196

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60465

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

KIRKSEY MCCORD NIX, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:15-CV-77

Before BARKSDALE, ELROD, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kirksey McCord Nix, Jr., federal prisoner #20921-077, contests the 

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as time-barred. The 

district court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error; its conclusions of 

law, de novo. E.g., United States v. Redd, 562 F.3d 309, 311 (5th Cir. 2009). 

The denial of § 2255 relief may be affirmed on any basis supported by the 

record. Scott v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir. 2000).

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60465 Document: 00514873895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2019
No. 15-60465

2

The one-year limitations period applicable to § 2255 motions runs from

the latest of four events including, pertinent here, the date on which the right 

asserted by movant was recognized by the Supreme Court, “if that right has 

been newly recognized by the . . . Court and made retroactively applicable to 

cases on collateral review”. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3). Nix contends his § 2255 

motion was timely filed under § 2255(f)(3) because it relies on a new right 

announced in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014). 

In United States v. Nix, 694 F. App’x 287, 288 (5th Cir. 2017), our court 

found Nix failed to show Rosemond applies retroactively to cases on collateral 

review. Also, Rosemond addresses the application of the aiding-and-abetting 

statute when the underlying offense includes the requirement that the offense 

be committed during, and in relation to, the predicate offense, that is a 

combination offense. See United States v. Carbins, 882 F.3d 557, 565 (5th Cir. 

2018); United States v. Baker, 912 F.3d 297, 312–15 (5th Cir. 2019). Nix’s 

relevant conviction is for conspiracy to violate the murder-for-hire statute, 18 

U.S.C. § 1958(a). United States v. Sharpe, 995 F.2d 49, 50 (5th Cir. 1993) 

(Sharpe I). Rosemond does not apply to the facts of Nix’s case. See, e.g., Baker, 

912 F.3d at 312–315. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-60465 Document: 00514873895 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2019
# U.S

# . II80 eeLni ne(gy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

# #3.1

EERE Homes

=11 

# ''

Appliancces Home About Standards Laws & Regulations Information Resources Notices & Rules Priority Setting 2046 Schedule Setting Public Workshops & Hearings State Petitions Useful Links Commercial Products Residential Products Search H elp i More Search Options x EERE Information Center 

## Residential Electric and Gas Ranges and Microwave Ovens , Dishwashers, Dehumidifier , and Commercial Clothes Washers Public Meeting The Department held an informal public meeting on April 27, 2006, to discuss and receive comments on issues to be addressed in the Framework Document for establishing energy conservation standards for residential electric and gas ranges and ovens and microwave ovens, dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and commercial clothes washers. The Department is also initiating the data collection. Written comments on these subjects are encouraged and should be received by May 11, 2006. 

## Meeting Materials 1 • Workshop Agenda (PDF 21 KB) • Workshop Presentation (PDF 719 KB) 

## To Submit Comments You may submit comments electronically, by hand delivery, by mail, or by courier by May 11, 2006. Wherever possible, comments in the electronic format should carry the electronic signature of the author. Absent an electronic signature, comments submitted electronically must be followed and authenticated by submitting a signed original paper document. Comments should be submitted with reference to the docket number EE-2006-STD0127 and/or RIN number 1904

- AB49 by the following methods: 

### • Federal eRulemaking Portal, directions for submitting comments are on the site. • E-mail: home_aapliance.rulemaking_ aee.doegov, please include EE2006
- STD-0127 and/or RIN 1904-AB49 in the subject line of the message. • Regular Mail, Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program Mailstop: EE-2J, Room 1J-018 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0121 For information related to this rulemaking please visit the Cooking Products, Dehumidifers, Dishwashers, or Commercial Clothes Washers webpages, 

### Contact Information Bryan Berrin_ger Project Manager (202) 586-0371 F5 Printable Version Webmaster I Security & Privacy I Building Technologies Program Home I EERE Home U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated : 04/28/2006

# Summary of Comments on http://www.eere.energy. gov/buildings/appliance_standards/reside Page: 1 Number: 1 Author: DOE Subject : Note Date : 9/4/2007 4:23:14 PM See comment number 01.4 

## Number: 2 Author: DOE Subject: Sticky Note Date: 9/4/2007 4:25:09 PM See comment number 03.1.1
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, L. Mychal Jefferson, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

  b) evaluated the effectiveness of  the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in  the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during  the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect  the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  December 15, 2004                     /s/ L. Mychal Jefferson
       -----------------                     ---------------------------
                                                 L. Mychal Jefferson
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>