alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment to the AK Steel Corporation Long-Term Performance Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.6 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 AK STEEL CORPORATION 
 LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE PLAN 
 (as amended and restated as of March 17, 2005) 
  

 Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved to the Board of Directors of AK Steel Corporation in Section 14 of the AK Steel Corporation Long-Term
Performance Plan (as amended and restated as of March 17, 2005) (the “Plan”), and with the intent to ensure that the Plan complies with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations
thereunder, effective as of October 18, 2007 the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 The first sentence in Section 5 is changed in
its entirety to read as follows: 
 “The Performance Award Payment Date is the date on which any Performance Awards are paid to Plan
Members, which date shall not be later than March 15 immediately following the last day of each Performance Period.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AK Steel Corporation has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be
executed this 22nd day of October, 2007. 
  

			
	AK STEEL HOLDING CORPORATION
	AK STEEL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David C. Horn

		 	 David C. Horn, Senior Vice President,
 General Counsel
and Secretary
### §2263. Pretrial release of defendant

In any proceeding pursuant to section 3142 for the purpose of determining whether a defendant charged under this chapter shall be released pending trial, or for the purpose of determining conditions of such release, the alleged victim shall be given an opportunity to be heard regarding the danger posed by the defendant.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40221(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1928.)
§ 685.221 Alternative repayment plan. ( a ) The Secretary may provide an alternative repayment plan to a borrower who demonstrates to the Secretary's satisfaction that the terms and conditions of the repayment plans specified in §§ 685.208 and 685.209 are not adequate to accommodate the borrower's exceptional circumstances.
( b ) The Secretary may require a borrower to provide evidence of the borrower's exceptional circumstances before permitting the borrower to repay a loan under an alternative repayment plan.
( c ) If the Secretary agrees to permit a borrower to repay a loan under an alternative repayment plan, the Secretary notifies the borrower in writing of the terms of the plan. After the borrower receives notification of the terms of the plan, the borrower may accept the plan or choose another repayment plan.
( d ) A borrower must repay a loan under an alternative repayment plan within 30 years of the date the loan entered repayment, not including periods of deferment and forbearance.
[88 FR 43905, July 10, 2023]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 489

 549

 424

 405

 381

 387

 373

 330

 366

 434

 437

 445

 461

 492

 479

 478

 457

 400

 348

 368

 422

 366

 0

 364

 566

 547

 597

 578

 534

 485

 485

 222

 225

 222

 220

 225

 224

 231

 216

 205

 201

 190

 198

 189

 196

 199

 200

 220

 214

 211

 221

 225

 228

 0

 249

 219

 236

 238

 238

 240

 250

 255

 289

 298

 283

 278

 278

 277

 265

 255

 246

 254

 247

 247

 242

 257

 275

 280

 282

 263

 256

 266

 267

 284

 0

 280

 311

 317

 326

 306

 297

 311

 327

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:September 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 195

 200

 191

 188

 188

 187

 180

 174

 168

 173

 169

 169

 166

 175

 186

 189

 190

 179

 174

 180

 181

 192

 0

 189

 208

 212

 217

 205

 200

 208

 218

TOTAL 8,364

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 600

 534

 477

 510

 498

 533

 553

 521

 546

 548

 539

 558

 553

 520

 531

 525

 521

 453

 524

 523

 508

 524

 413

 498

 559

 544

 527

 532

 475

 383

 422

 503

 469

 438

 438

 455

 455

 489

 495

 515

 513

 516

 533

 481

 472

 505

 493

 476

 348

 367

 481

 477

 375

 368

 395

 512

 475

 499

 477

 366

 356

 336

 559

 502

 460

 471

 479

 485

 525

 511

 537

 531

 526

 545

 524

 498

 517

 507

 508

 378

 441

 501

 493

 486

 385

 422

 541

 499

 516

 514

 397

 371

 373

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 361

 326

 300

 307

 312

 316

 340

 332

 348

 344

 341

 353

 340

 324

 336

 329

 330

 250

 289

 326

 321

 316

 254

 277

 350

 324

 335

 334

 261

 245

 247

TOTAL 15,002

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
**EXHIBIT
      23(b)**


CONSENT
      OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-20859, 333-86232, 333-06371, 333-19833, 333-90652, 333-130994 on Form S-8
      of
      our report dated March 28, 2005 (March 16, 2006 as to the 2004 effects of the
      discontinued operations described in Note 2) relating to the financial
      statements and financial statement schedule of Cavalier Homes, Inc. and
      subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, appearing in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Cavalier Homes, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.





/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP





Birmingham,
      Alabama


March
      8,
      2007
## DOE Meeting Memorandum: Ex Parte Communications

Date: June 22, 2015

DOE Attendees: John Cymbalsky and Lucy d eButts, EERE

Outside attendees: Patrick Keal, Big Ass Solutions and Terry Paul and Janie Wise, Cassidy & Associates

Meeting Contact: Janie Wise

– jwise@cassidy.com / 202

- 585

- 2553

Subject: Pending rulemaking on Ceiling Fans Energy Conservation Standards

Summary: Big Ass Solutions is headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, and designs and manufact ures a variety of fan models for commercial, industrial and residential use. BAS met with DOE to discuss the ongoing rulemaking process for the residential ceiling fans energy conservation standards, docket number EERE

- 2012

- BT

- STD

- 0045.

Earlier in June 2015 DOE released a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register to refine earlier technical issues and seek additional stakeholder comment on specific topics related to ceiling fan test procedures and energy conservation standards. B AS met with DOE to discuss the five topics named by DOE in that SNOPR as specifically open for comment, in particular the use of five operating speeds and the weighted

- average approach to rating high

- volume low diameter fans. BAS will submit more detailed written comments in a formal response to the SNOPR.

BAS and DOE also briefly discussed the upcoming rulemaking on test procedures for External Power Supplies and whether BAS products could be affected.
#### Georgeanna McBee, Respondent, v County of Onondaga, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 531]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J.), entered December 1, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order granted plaintiffs application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its broad discretion in granting plaintiffs application pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) seeking leave to serve a late notice of claim (see *Wetzel Servs. Corp. v Town of Amherst,*207 AD2d 965 [1994]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse for her delay (see *Matter of Greene v Rochester Hous. Auth.,*273 AD2d 895 [2000]). Further, although defendant did not have actual notice of the facts underlying the claim within 90 days following plaintiff’s accident, defendant failed to establish that it was prejudiced by the lack of timely notice (see *Matter of Haeg v County of Suffolk,*30 AD3d 519, 520 [2006]; *Matter of McHugh v City of New York,*293 AD2d 478 [2002]). According to plaintiff, defendant was negligent in its design of its recreation trail in Onondaga Lake Park, and “[t]here is no evidence in the record that any design changes were made subsequent to the subject accident which would impede [defendant’s] ability to investigate [plaintiffs] claim” *(McHugh,*293 AD2d at 478; *see Haeg,*30 AD3d at 520-521; *see also Matter of Bitetto v City of Yonkers,*13 AD3d 367, 368 [2004]; *Greene,*273 AD2d 895 [2000]). Present—Scudder, J.P, Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1375

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of North Dakota. Crystal Lee Fredericks, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 13, 2004 Filed: April 13, 2005

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. On November 18, 2003, a jury found Crystal Lee Fredericks guilty of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance–five grams or more of methamphetamine. The district court 1 sentenced Fredericks to sixty-three months' imprisonment, with a four-year term of supervised release. This appeal followed. This case was submitted to the court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Fredericks' counsel moves to withdraw, arguing that there exists no-2- appealable issues in this case and that Fredericks no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. Having carefully reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Further, we find no dispute with the assertions of Fredericks' counsel concerning Fredericks' own wishes. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

______________________________
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

January-10

Colored background verified with DFG's report Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily T

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre 

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,939 1,009 3,948 5,830 2,

2-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,944 1,008 3,952 5,839 2,

3-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,946 1,008 3,955 5,844 2,

4-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,859 1,006 4,865 7,654 1,

5-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,354 1,004 5,359 8,637 1,6-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,515 1,002 5,517 8,955 1,7-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,937 1,001 4,938 7,809 1,

8-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,908 1,000 4,907 7,751 1,

9-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,355 1,001 4,356 6,654 1,

10-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,550 1,004 4,554 7,041 1,

11-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327 1,002 4,330 6,600 1,

12-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 3,507 1,005 4,512 6,956 1,

13-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,991 1,009 5,000 7,917 2,

14-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,321 1,006 5,326 8,570 1,15-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,096 999 6,095 10,107 1,

16-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,861 1,003 5,864 9,641 1,17-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,424 1,007 6,431 10,759 1,

18-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 0 0 4,876 1,007 5,884 9,672 1,19-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 1 0 0 4,936 1,011 5,947 9,790 2,20-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,896 1,013 5,909 9,712 2,21-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 4,944 1,595 6,539 9,806 3,22-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 582 1,831 2,412 1,154 3,

23-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 2 0 0 3,802 1,832 5,633 7,541 3,

24-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 3 0 0 3,432 2,453 5,886 6,808 4,

25-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 2 28 30 6 0 0 2,734 2,696 5,430 5,422 5,

26-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 12 4 16 7 0 0 4,672 2,706 7,378 9,267 5,27-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 50 4 54 10 0 0 3,900 3,180 7,080 7,736 6,28-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 18 4 22 12 0 0 4,673 3,329 8,002 9,268 6,29-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 13 0 0 5,339 3,327 8,666 10,590 6,

30-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 18 8 26 15 0 0 5,353 3,327 8,680 10,618 6,

31-Jan-10 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 17 0 0 3,634 3,326 6,961 7,209 6,

Total 0 XXXX 130 104 234 XXXX 0 0 124,607 49,709 174,316 247,157 98,

Official numbers are posted on DFG's websiteNote: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks 

Trac
[4910-13-P[

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation AdmiJistratidll

I

"11{;ig, __

'"""''-'-''''''-''"'

1. e,.J,,\ '""c

;,.," <,

9ft & /;,

14CFR Part 39 ,\,r,

, ',j....,.

\1"

{Docket No. FAA-1010-r'''***; Directorate Identifier 1010·NM-OS1-ADj

RIN 2120-AA64

AinrorthillCSs Directives; Fokkcr Servjces I3.Y. Mode! F.2S !\'Iurk 0070 and 0 I00

Airplanes

AGE!\:C\': Federal Aviation Administration (FA:A), DOT.

ACTION: Notice or pro'posed rule making (NPRM).

SUIVI[VIARY: "Ve propolse La adopt :'ll1C,Vairworthiness direcLive (AD) lor till' prDduct.

infOrTn<llion (MeAl) originated by <1naviation authomy of :mother counlry to idcnlil~'

lislcd abo\'e. This propo~cd AD results from mandatory continUIng mrworthiness

••",,,,,,,"=

A M"' -Ii '1.

li~

77 ?I/o ,md corrcel an uns~.d";condition on~!l1 aviation product. The MeAl dcsnib,,;s lilt: UIlS.ti".:: 'V""~C.'"~"".

A{"'rl\.-rc I

conditlull <JS:

Inspection JUS! after landing revealed a lot of ice Ilear the LH M.LG down\ock

aciuntor. >;: •• "'

Thl: nighl crew dfa F28 Mark 0070 (Fokkcr 70) it~·roplane received a l\lLG [Ill; rtl"

landing gear) ul~afe mcss:igc<In.:r landing gear down selectIon during approacl .

"""'''''''~."'''''. 'l' •• '" , ' ~ ~

,..t\ ;'v r

v

'" - I C! ~'

"""'r"Pd-.''''' r\

< . I" ilf I

', Y'; _\.n, ,

,r; .' '1'1L1',,,

'11 J 0 lifJ

Based all the quantity and location of the ice, it is considered highly likdy thai

the ice had [armed between the upper end of the dOWI1Jock aclualor and the'

llpper side brace[ and was ac<.':ul1lul:ltedd\Jril1g taxi all slush- and sno\\,'-

contaminaled ta~jwaysand runway a\ the dcpanurc <tirron.

1c:,cm tillS loc<Jti?n prev •.•. lJts ihe- 3cttlillor from lummg Fredy relative to lhe

upper side hmce' during laEdin.s g~:lr down sckdion, likely j.:.su!ung 111fili!ure

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (5-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

June 2003

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Jun-03 1284 240 1524 948 39 204 243 73 6747 4386 11133 13383 8699 22082

2-Jun-03 742 132 874 987 120 252 372 98 6480 4389 10869 12853 8706 21559

3-Jun-03 642 180 822 1017 159 492 651 145 6480 4426 10905 12853 8778 21631

4-Jun-03 1167 324 1491 1095 240 612 852 205 6475 4448 10923 12843 8822 21665

5-Jun-03 900 216 1116 1090 207 816 1023 278 6541 4448 10990 12975 8823 21798

6-Jun-03 849 132 981 1090 333 780 1113 356 6601 4507 11109 13094 8940 22034

7-Jun-03 396 48 444 1047 273 1344 1617 470 6605 4483 11088 13102 8892 21994

8-Jun-03 321 36 357 1014 333 1128 1461 571 6042 4442 10484 11985 8810 20795

9-Jun-03 297 12 309 1000 228 480 708 619 6501 4412 10913 12894 8751 21645

10-Jun-03 330 0 330 987 456 780 1236 707 6543 4407 10951 12979 8742 21721

11-Jun-03 321 0 321 947 138 288 426 735 6319 4400 10718 12533 8727 21260

12-Jun-03 249 12 261 848 180 360 540 762 6044 4393 10438 11989 8714 20703

13-Jun-03 117 48 165 769 258 408 666 793 6027 4424 10451 11955 8775 20730

14-Jun-03 165 60 225 659 72 276 348 804 5719 4357 10076 11344 8642 19986

15-Jun-03 108 12 120 558 90 408 498 822 5801 4363 10165 11507 8655 20162

16-Jun-03 51 0 51 500 153 312 465 829 6549 4365 10914 12989 8658 21647

17-Jun-03 54 12 66 446 108 108 216 798 6570 4408 10978 13031 8743 21774

18-Jun-03 15 12 27 341 234 180 414 767 6517 4369 10886 12926 8666 21592

19-Jun-03 12 24 36 264 138 216 354 719 5832 4450 10282 11567 8827 20394

20-Jun-03 0 0 0 194 54 300 354 665 6502 4427 10929 12897 8781 21678

21-Jun-03 0 0 0 162 96 204 300 570 6589 4418 11007 13069 8763 21832

22-Jun-03 6 12 18 138 24 132 156 477 6610 4407 11016 13110 8741 21851

23-Jun-03 18 0 18 117 141 120 261 445 6435 4371 10806 12764 8670 21434

24-Jun-03 0 12 12 94 18 144 162 369 6308 4340 10648 12512 8609 21121

25-Jun-03 0 12 12 72 48 72 120 347 3880 4395 8275 7695 8718 16413

26-Jun-03 0 0 0 54 0 72 72 313 3357 4389 7745 6658 8705 15363

27-Jun-03 0 0 0 42 0 72 72 271 3373 4395 7769 6691 8718 15409

28-Jun-03 0 0 0 26 0 24 24 248 3410 4402 7812 6763 8732 15495

29-Jun-03 0 0 0 17 0 36 36 215 4399 4391 8790 8726 8709 17435

30-Jun-03 0 0 0 14 7 36 43 185 6628 4342 10970 13146 8613 21759

Total 8044 1536 9580 XXXX 4147 10656 14803 XXXX 177884 132155 310039 352833 262129 614962

Delta Smelt Incidental Take Levels

Yellow Light Level = 400 (14 day Average)

Red Light Level = 47,245 (June-Below Normal)

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
#### In the Matter of the Will of Philip Dietz, Deceased. May Pflug et al., Appellants; Emil Dietz et al., as Executors of Philip Dietz, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
§ 664.14 What is an advanced overseas intensive language training project? ( a ) ( 1 ) An advanced overseas intensive language project is designed to take advantage of the opportunities present in the foreign country that are not present in the United States when providing intensive advanced foreign language training.
( 2 ) Project activities may be carried out during a full year, an academic year, a semester, a trimester, a quarter, or a summer.
( 3 ) Generally, language training must be given at the advanced level, i.e., at the level equivalent to that provided to students who have successfully completed two academic years of language training.
( 4 ) The language to be studied must be indigenous to the host country and maximum use must be made of local institutions and personnel.
( b ) Generally, participants in projects under this program must have successfully completed at least two academic years of training in the language to be studied.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4831

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE R. KIBBE, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95-

73-MJG)

Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Barry J. Pollack, Assistant

Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne

A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Barbara S. Sale, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George R. Kibbe, II, appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a twenty-four month term

of imprisonment. Kibbe contends that the district court erred in

failing to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the probation officer’s illegal search of his residence. We find that the

admission of the evidence was not improper. See United States v.

Armstrong, ___ F.3d ___, 1999 WL 498713, at *3 (4th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed by the district

court. We deny Kibbe’s motion for reconsideration of the order

placing the case in abeyance as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
The St ate of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00150

- CR

Billy BENAVIDEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09

- CRD

- 1 22

Honorable J. Manuel Banales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The 229 th District Court ’ s extension of time to file its written finding of fact and

conclusions of law is granted. Time is extended to December 11, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,139

 1,093

 1,096

 1,038

 879

 783

 344

 424

 438

 607

 623

 907

 755

 955

 1,461

 1,914

 1,438

 1,290

 1,327

 961

 562

 503

 722

 519

 515

 752

 937

 1,006

 1,215

 1,169

 224

 219

 234

 223

 242

 213

 206

 196

 198

 200

 194

 189

 195

 204

 215

 273

 229

 253

 239

 224

 199

 191

 197

 187

 158

 183

 162

 168

 172

 182

 509

 486

 491

 497

 437

 363

 257

 247

 238

 248

 268

 296

 316

 365

 462

 608

 542

 494

 584

 422

 279

 268

 272

 244

 231

 289

 328

 389

 424

 400

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,661

 4,793

 4,934

 5,091

 5,269

 5,416

 5,450

 5,465

 5,464

 5,460

 5,449

 5,357

 5,177

 5,018

 4,971

 5,093

 5,144

 5,141

 5,288

 5,347

 5,369

 5,390

 5,424

 5,420

 5,383

 5,376

 5,388

 5,412

 5,374

 5,166

 333

 342

 352

 364

 376

 387

 389

 390

 390

 390

 389

 383

 370

 358

 355

 364

 367

 367

 378

 382

 384

 385

 387

 387

 385

 384

 385

 387

 384

 369

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 11.23 Sales conditioned on the acquisition of other products. ( a ) *General.* A sale in which any part of the sale involves, directly or indirectly, the acquisition by the industry member from the trade buyer, or the agreement, as a condition to present or future sales, to accept other products from the trade buyer is prohibited.
( b ) *Exchange.* The exchange of one product for another is prohibited as a sales transaction conditioned on the acquisition of other products. However, the exchange of a product for equal quantities (case for case) of the same type and brand of product, in containers of another size is not considered an acquisition of “other” products and is not prohibited if there was no direct or implied privilege of return extended when the product was originally sold. Industry members may make price adjustments on products eligible for exchange under this paragraph.