alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000046916
<NAME> HENRY CO.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,022,676
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,917,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                   766,633
<INVENTORY>                                 14,787,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,409,650
<PP&E>                                      73,250,825
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,880,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,513,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,029,970
<BONDS>                                     85,973,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,660,874
<COMMON>                                     4,691,080
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,139,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,513,800
<SALES>                                    150,156,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           157,510,857
<CGS>                                      105,142,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              140,171,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,081,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               501,840
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,566,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,580,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                   509,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,903,741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,071,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAXIMO MENDEZ-MARIA, AKA 

Maximino Cristobal Mendez Orozco, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70781 

Agency No. A205-320-748 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Maximo Mendez-Maria, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of 

removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70781 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law de novo, 

Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that 

deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and 

regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review 

for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the 

petition for review.

The agency did not err in finding that Mendez-Maria failed to establish 

membership in a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 

1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, 

“[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who 

share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) 

socially distinct within the society in question.’” (quoting Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 

I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s 

determination that Mendez-Maria failed to establish that any harm he experienced 

or fears in Guatemala was or would be on account of a protected ground. See 

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to 

be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by 
3 18-70781 

gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). Thus, Mendez-Maria’s 

withholding of removal claim fails. 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Mendez-Maria failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Guatemalan government. See Aden

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Mendez-Maria’s contentions regarding his 

religious persecution claim because he failed to raise them to the BIA. See Barron 

v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
§ 668.136 Institutional determinations of eligibility based on INS responses to secondary confirmation requests. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an institution that has requested secondary confirmation under § 668.133(a) shall make its determination concerning a student's eligibility under § 668.33(a)(2) by relying on the INS response to the Form G-845.
( b ) An institution shall make its determination concerning a student's eligibility under § 668.33(a)(2) pending the institution's receipt of an INS response to the institution's Form G-845 request concerning that student, if— ( 1 ) The institution has given the student an opportunity to submit documents to the institution to support the student's claim to be an eligible noncitizen;
( 2 ) The institution possesses sufficient documentation concerning a student's immigration status to make that determination;
( 3 ) At least 15 business days have elapsed from the date that the institution sent the Form G-845 request to the INS;
( 4 ) The institution has no documentation that conflicts with the immigration-status documentation submitted by the student; and
( 5 ) The institution has no reason to believe that the immigration status reported by the applicant is incorrect.
( c ) An institution shall establish and use policies and procedures to ensure that, if the institution has disbursed or released title IV, HEA funds to the student in the award year or employed the student under the Federal Work-Study Program, and the institution determines, in reliance on the INS response to the institution's request for secondary confirmation regarding that student, that the student was in fact not an eligible noncitizen during that award year, the institution provides the student with notice of the institution's determination, an opportunity to contest the institution's determination, and notice of the institution's final determination.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091, 1094)
[58 FR 3184, Jan. 7, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 40626, July 29, 1998]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Harris, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed, and new trial ordered, for prejudicial error in the admission of evidence in "relation to defendant’s photograph from the police records, with inscriptions on the back thereof, and also of conversations held in the absence of the defendant. Jenks, P. J., Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Thomas and Rich, JJ., dissented.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 274

 264

 264

 178

 164

 161

 179

 199

 207

 144

 149

 153

 155

 165

 169

 244

 278

 243

 226

 198

 149

 157

 168

 169

 151

 235

 197

 315

 286

 296

 305

 156

 151

 149

 148

 137

 132

 129

 130

 132

 128

 127

 127

 127

 127

 127

 127

 130

 131

 132

 132

 131

 130

 131

 132

 133

 134

 130

 130

 131

 132

 134

 173

 170

 168

 156

 150

 146

 145

 150

 148

 134

 135

 137

 139

 141

 139

 145

 159

 152

 151

 149

 141

 138

 141

 141

 141

 152

 142

 155

 160

 153

 167

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,435

 2,446

 2,457

 2,456

 2,450

 2,431

 2,414

 2,402

 2,376

 2,320

 2,238

 2,176

 2,130

 2,092

 2,058

 2,033

 2,024

 2,020

 2,021

 2,024

 2,020

 2,008

 2,001

 2,008

 2,014

 2,029

 2,032

 2,046

 2,067

 2,075

 2,083

 174

 175

 176

 175

 175

 174

 172

 172

 170

 166

 160

 155

 152

 149

 147

 145

 145

 144

 144

 145

 144

 143

 143

 143

 144

 145

 145

 146

 148

 148

 149

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### Part II—Other Matters
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 719

 687

 653

 731

 693

 666

 663

 669

 679

 665

 650

 665

 653

 626

 615

 614

 626

 652

 660

 673

 673

 682

 668

 696

 707

 703

 685

 688

 668

 679

 683

 629

 595

 548

 534

 512

 512

 514

 528

 546

 528

 513

 494

 516

 537

 543

 558

 567

 607

 608

 623

 618

 617

 619

 617

 615

 616

 608

 602

 603

 694

 673

 625

 603

 581

 566

 568

 576

 589

 597

 598

 595

 575

 566

 575

 578

 593

 616

 626

 644

 647

 649

 645

 651

 649

 645

 640

 632

 622

 625

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 445

 432

 402

 389

 375

 366

 367

 372

 380

 385

 386

 384

 371

 366

 371

 373

 382

 397

 403

 414

 416

 417

 415

 418

 417

 415

 412

 407

 400

 402

TOTAL 18,443

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5037 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5037

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, as the ``Walter 
                      B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALTER B. JONES, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Walter B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walter B. 
Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5037

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, as the ``Walter 
                      B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Feihe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Feihe International, Inc.





Date:  May 2, 2011
By:
/s/ Leng You-BinLeng You-Bin, Director, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
  Date:  May 2, 2011
By:
/s/  Liu HuaLiu Hua, Acting Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Feihe International, Inc. and will be retained by Feihe International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SEC. 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                      |                                                     |                               |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                     |
|                                 |                                                |                          |
| Date: November              20, 2006 |                                                     | /s/ Leng              You-Bin |
|                                      | Leng              You-Bin                                |
|                                      | Chief              Executive Officer and President  |
|         |                                                            |                          |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|         |                                                            |
|    |                                                       |                     |
|         |                                                            | /s/ Liu              Hua |
|         | Liu              Hua                                            |
|         | Treasurer              and              Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clark PROCTOR, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4015.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

Phillip E. Lewis, Matthews Law Firm, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Thomas R. Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Clark Proctor, Jr., appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine base with the intent to distribute and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841, 846 (West 1999 & Supp.2001). Finding no error, we affirm Proctor’s sentence.

Proctor contends his concurrent 360-month sentences are invalid under *Ap*
      *903
      *prendi v. New Jersey,*580 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). However, Proctor’s sentence is not above the thirty year statutory maximum of § 841(b)(1)(C) applicable where the defendant has at least one qualifying prior conviction. *See United States v. Dinnall,*269 F.3d 418 (4th Cir.2001); *United States v. Promise,*255 F.3d 150 (4th Cir.2001) (en banc), *petition for cert. filed,*(U.S. Sept. 20, 2001) (No. 01-6398). Moreover, contrary to Proctor’s contention, *Apprendi*does not apply to judicial fact finding under the guidelines. *United States v. Kinter,*235 F.3d 192, 199-201 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 937, 121 S.Ct. 1393, 149 L.Ed.2d 316 (2001). Thus, we find *Apprendi*is not implicated and affirm Proctor’s sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,681

 3,519

 4,001

 4,689

 3,956

 4,345

 4,980

 5,943

 5,539

 5,757

 5,512

 5,225

 3,972

 3,849

 2,650

 2,660

 2,609

 3,632

 3,140

 3,943

 3,344

 3,540

 2,091

 1,881

 1,572

 2,120

 2,131

 443

 1,870

 2,569

 3,033

 414

 427

 420

 499

 454

 459

 481

 549

 558

 616

 621

 474

 819

 351

 383

 396

 359

 332

 362

 292

 375

 360

 358

 382

 348

 337

 321

 227

 263

 297

 322

 1,025

 1,503

 1,835

 1,916

 1,327

 1,476

 1,849

 2,247

 2,085

 2,167

 2,294

 1,719

 2,267

 1,711

 989

 850

 928

 1,064

 1,207

 1,154

 1,111

 1,106

 902

 881

 679

 832

 592

 324

 547

 730

 895

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 21,185

 21,377

 21,692

 22,067

 21,911

 21,856

 22,065

 22,589

 23,385

 24,311

 25,205

 24,774

 24,959

 25,421

 25,385

 24,732

 23,825

 22,973

 22,853

 22,531

 21,793

 20,652

 19,469

 18,183

 16,568

 15,681

 14,006

 12,619

 12,177

 12,057

 12,024

 1,513

 1,527

 1,549

 1,576

 1,565

 1,561

 1,576

 1,614

 1,670

 1,737

 1,800

 1,770

 1,783

 1,816

 1,813

 1,767

 1,702

 1,641

 1,632

 1,609

 1,557

 1,475

 1,391

 1,299

 1,183

 1,120

 1,000

 901

 870

 861

 859

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 742

 769

 779

 759

 746

 737

 758

 708

 624

 594

 509

 632

 547

 618

 668

 709

 442

 468

 485

 463

 586

 666

 483

 491

 491

 483

 488

 483

 486

 490

 340

 356

 399

 344

 332

 328

 317

 325

 316

 336

 327

 340

 367

 315

 305

 305

 303

 412

 435

 439

 461

 442

 444

 434

 415

 381

 463

 456

 442

 471

 507

 517

 563

 518

 474

 479

 520

 502

 417

 458

 357

 477

 467

 452

 423

 438

 386

 441

 459

 450

 488

 554

 470

 458

 459

 436

 475

 473

 467

 480

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 329

 336

 364

 336

 309

 312

 337

 326

 274

 299

 237

 311

 305

 295

 277

 287

 255

 289

 300

 294

 318

 358

 306

 299

 300

 285

 310

 308

 305

 313

TOTAL 14,065

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 27, 2003 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

Date: November 12, 2003

                                             /s/ A. Roland Thomas
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: A. Roland Thomas
                                             Title: President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer