alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DUSTIN HARPEL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 636

[ November 21, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg

- Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2014

- CF

- 003530

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksride r, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

T

AYLOR , C IKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Bernard McDougall


Bernard McDougall

1750 W. King Edward

Vancouver, BC  V6J 2V9










November 2, 2007







Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

#1205 – 789 West Pender Street

Vancouver, BC  V6C 1H2







To the Board of Directors:







I, Bernard McDougall, tender my resignation as a Director and president of Micron Enviro Systems, Inc., effective immediately.   







Yours truly,







/s/ Bernard McDougall







Bernard McDougall
United States Bankruptcy Court 

Eastern District of Virginia 

______________ Division

In re: Case No. ______________________________

Adv. Proceeding No. _____________________ 

Debtor(s)

TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND, IF APPLICABLE, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Ț158, Notice of Appeal was filed herein on _________________________________. 

[Check Box if Applicable] The Appellant(s) also filed a Motion for Leave to Appeal with the Notice of Appeal. 

The parties included in the Appeal to the District Court: 

APPELLANT(S): _______________________________________________

 _______________________________________________________ 

 ______________________________________________________ 

ATTORNEY: _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

APPELLEE(S): _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

ATTORNEY: _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

 _______________________________________________________ 

Brief Description of Judgment/Order Appealed: _____________________________________________________________________________ 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Date Judgment/Order Entered: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1. Filing Fees: A. Notice of Appeal – Filing Fee $5.00 ( ) Paid ( ) Not Paid 

B. Appeal Docket Fee - $293.00 ( ) Paid ( ) Not Paid ( ) Deferred. See Attached Request 

2. ( ) Notice of Appeal 

3. ( ) Motion for Leave to Appeal (if any) 

WILLIAM C. REDDEN, Clerk of Court

By _____________________________________, Deputy Clerk

Date transmitted: ____________________ Telephone No. ______________________________ 

..............................................................................................................................................................................

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NUMBER: _______________________________ 

DATE: ________________________ BY: _______________________________ 

PLEASE RETURN COPY UPON COMPLETION 

[transenot ver. 12/14]

Richmond

LeClairRyan PLLC 19-34574-KRH

[Adversary Proceeding Number]

April 26, 2022

Ms. Robin Teskin and Ms. Gretchen Jackson

John McJunkin

901 K. Street, NW, Suite 900

Washington, DC 20001

Lynn Tavenner, Ch.7 Trustee

Paula Beran

20 North Eighth Street, 2nd Floor

Richmond, VA 23219

Order Denying Motion to Amend Debtor's Equity Security Holders List and

Memorandum Opinion

Docket entries [1301 and 1302] filed on 4/21/2022

✔

✔

✔

/s/: N. Bullock

April 27, 2022 (804) 916-2428

3:22cv328

4/27/2022 /s/ A. Shoe, Deputy Clerk

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1312 Filed 04/28/22 Entered 04/28/22 10:51:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 76.591 Federal evaluation—cooperation by a grantee.

A grantee shall cooperate in any evaluation of the program by the Secretary.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1226c, 1231a, 3474, and 6511(a))

[45 FR 86298, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 30341, July 8, 1992]
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Frank A. Dillenback, Deceased. Francis G. Miller et al., Appellants; Northern New York Trust Company, Respondent.

Decree affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur. (The decree construes a will.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [189 Mise. 538.]
### §1605. Seizure; custody; storage

All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws, or laws relating to the navigation, registering, enrolling or licensing, or entry or clearance, of vessels, unless otherwise provided by law, shall be placed and remain in the custody of the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the seizure was made to await disposition according to law.

Pending such disposition, the property shall be stored in such place as, in the customs officer's opinion, is most convenient and appropriate with due regard to the expense involved, whether or not the place of storage is within the judicial district or the customs collection district in which the property was seized; and storage of the property outside the judicial district or customs collection district in which it was seized shall in no way affect the jurisdiction of the court which would otherwise have jurisdiction over such property.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §605, 46 Stat. 754; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213, title V, §505, 68 Stat. 1141; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(cc), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §321, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2056; Pub. L. 98–573, title II, §213(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §605, 42 Stat. 985. That section was superseded by section 605 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Provisions substantially similar to those in this section so far as it relates to merchandise or property seized under the customs laws, were contained in R.S. §3086, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §642, 42 Stat. 989.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–573 and Pub. L. 98–473 inserted reference to aircraft in first par.

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted references to appropriate customs officer or customs officer for references to collector wherever appearing.

1954—Act Sept. 1, 1954, permitted collector of seized property to store it in such places as he considers convenient or appropriate, whether within or without the judicial district in which it was seized, without affecting the jurisdiction of the court over such property.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective Oct. 15, 1984, see section 214(e) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1304 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD.

# ACTION:

Termination of Federal Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 41 CFR 102-3.55(a)(1), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b), and the Sunset provisions of Section 596 of Public Law 110-417, effective April 1, 2011 the Department of Defense gives notice that it is terminating the Military Leadership Diversity Commission.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jim Freeman, Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-601-6128.

Dated: March 23, 2011.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2011-7696 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,050

 2,478

 3,580

 3,136

 3,017

 3,157

 2,942

 3,456

 6,800

 5,967

 10,842

 8,319

 6,140

 7,501

 3,772

 4,380

 3,780

 2,998

 3,966

 4,202

 4,407

 7,843

 5,397

 7,511

 4,447

 4,840

 4,649

 3,542

 3,037

 1,918

 345

 255

 323

 457

 490

 610

 357

 294

 448

 563

 672

 1,262

 775

 907

 734

 572

 636

 536

 648

 781

 919

 803

 1,278

 807

 692

 469

 270

 253

 258

 210

 1,717

 1,382

 1,522

 1,800

 1,511

 1,543

 1,547

 1,639

 2,129

 2,818

 4,416

 3,964

 3,139

 3,910

 2,437

 2,077

 1,972

 1,951

 2,102

 2,223

 2,191

 2,691

 2,863

 3,401

 2,375

 1,953

 1,807

 1,542

 1,357

 1,132

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,701

 5,566

 5,438

 5,521

 4,744

 5,183

 4,752

 5,811

 6,485

 6,970

 7,219

 7,593

 6,998

 6,675

 5,659

 5,403

 4,876

 3,540

 2,036

 4,818

 5,702

 7,280

 6,744

 8,362

 7,478

 6,857

 7,638

 8,095

 7,512

 5,263

 4,086

 572

 665

 557

 747

 632

 491

 553

 520

 487

 437

 867

 739

 644

 566

 522

 591

 571

 594

 614

 586

 603

 517

 556

 766

 513

 952

 1,565

 828

 595

 453

 375

 3,541

 3,139

 3,050

 3,205

 2,184

 2,036

 1,944

 2,285

 2,414

 2,804

 3,170

 3,434

 3,201

 2,956

 2,683

 2,720

 2,557

 1,826

 1,040

 1,800

 2,271

 3,179

 2,805

 3,888

 3,876

 3,320

 4,416

 4,170

 3,565

 2,412

 1,624

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 38,254

 39,616

 41,223

 42,904

 43,672

 44,233

 44,587

 44,287

 43,251

 42,633

 41,637

 40,804

 40,122

 39,363

 38,505

 38,086

 37,593

 36,214

 35,070

 34,834

 35,161

 36,055

 36,446

 37,530

 38,236

 38,122

 39,337

 40,551

 41,433

 41,125

 40,192

 2,732

 2,830

 2,945

 3,065

 3,119

 3,160

 3,185

 3,163

 3,089

 3,045

 2,974

 2,915

 2,866

 2,812

 2,750

 2,720

 2,685

 2,587

 2,505

 2,488

 2,512

 2,575

 2,603

 2,681

 2,731

 2,723

 2,810

 2,897

 2,960

 2,938

 2,871

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 14

 

CODE OF ETHICS

 

VitalStream Holdings, Inc. has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller and any other persons performing similar functions on its behalf.

The text of the code of ethics is as set forth in the attachment to this Exhibit 14 (see next page). It is also posted on the Company's website, which has a URL of http://www.vitalstream.com. 
The code of ethics specifically has a URL of http://www.vitalstream.com/investor/vsth-code-of-ethics.pdf. 
 

Attachment to Exhibit 14

 
**VITALSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.**
§ 646.1 What is the Student Support Services Program? The Student Support Services Program provides grants for projects designed to— ( a ) Increase the college retention and graduation rates of eligible students;
( b ) Increase the transfer rate of eligible students from two-year to four-year institutions; and
( c ) Foster an institutional climate supportive of the success of students who are limited English proficient, students from groups that are traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education, individuals with disabilities, homeless children and youth, foster care youth, or other disconnected students; and
( d ) Improve the financial and economic literacy of students in areas such as— ( 1 ) Basic personal income, household money management, and financial planning skills; and
( 2 ) Basic economic decision-making skills.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-14)
[61 FR 38537, July 24, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 65790, Oct. 26, 2010]
§ 300.309 Determining the existence of a specific learning disability. ( a ) The group described in § 300.306 may determine that a child has a specific learning disability, as defined in § 300.8(c)(10), if— ( 1 ) The child does not achieve adequately for the child's age or to meet State-approved grade-level standards in one or more of the following areas, when provided with learning experiences and instruction appropriate for the child's age or State-approved grade-level standards: ( i ) Oral expression.
( ii ) Listening comprehension.
( iii ) Written expression.
( iv ) Basic reading skill.
( v ) Reading fluency skills.
( vi ) Reading comprehension.
( vii ) Mathematics calculation.
( viii ) Mathematics problem solving.
( 2 ) ( i ) The child does not make sufficient progress to meet age or State-approved grade-level standards in one or more of the areas identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section when using a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention; or
( ii ) The child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement, or both, relative to age, State-approved grade-level standards, or intellectual development, that is determined by the group to be relevant to the identification of a specific learning disability, using appropriate assessments, consistent with §§ 300.304 and 300.305; and
( 3 ) The group determines that its findings under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section are not primarily the result of— ( i ) A visual, hearing, or motor disability;
( ii ) An intellectual disability;
( iii ) Emotional disturbance;
( iv ) Cultural factors;
( v ) Environmental or economic disadvantage; or
( vi ) Limited English proficiency.
( b ) To ensure that underachievement in a child suspected of having a specific learning disability is not due to lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math, the group must consider, as part of the evaluation described in §§ 300.304 through 300.306— ( 1 ) Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as a part of, the referral process, the child was provided appropriate instruction in regular education settings, delivered by qualified personnel; and
( 2 ) Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting formal assessment of student progress during instruction, which was provided to the child's parents.
( c ) The public agency must promptly request parental consent to evaluate the child to determine if the child needs special education and related services, and must adhere to the timeframes described in §§ 300.301 and 300.303, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the child's parents and a group of qualified professionals, as described in § 300.306(a)(1)— ( 1 ) If, prior to a referral, a child has not made adequate progress after an appropriate period of time when provided instruction, as described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section; and
( 2 ) Whenever a child is referred for an evaluation.
[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 31912, July 11, 2017]
### §1553–1. Report on in-bond cargo

#### (a) Report

Not later than June 30, 2007, the Commissioner shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives that includes—

(1) a plan for closing in-bond entries at the port of arrival;

(2) an assessment of the personnel required to ensure 100 percent reconciliation of in-bond entries between the port of arrival and the port of destination or exportation;

(3) an assessment of the status of investigations of overdue in-bond shipments and an evaluation of the resources required to ensure adequate investigation of overdue in-bond shipments;

(4) a plan for tracking in-bond cargo within the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE);

(5) an assessment of whether any particular technologies should be required in the transport of in-bond cargo;

(6) an assessment of whether ports of arrival should require any additional information regarding shipments of in-bond cargo;

(7) an evaluation of the criteria for targeting and examining in-bond cargo; and

(8) an assessment of the feasibility of reducing the transit time for in-bond shipments, including an assessment of the impact of such a change on domestic and international trade.

#### (b) Definition

In this section, the term "Commissioner" means the Commissioner responsible for the United States Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §553A, as added Pub. L. 109–347, title IV, §406, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1931.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 553A of act June 17, 1930, is classified to section 1553a of this title.
### §1317. Tobacco products; supplies for certain vessels and aircraft

#### (a) Exportation of tobacco products

The shipment or delivery of manufactured tobacco, snuff, cigars, or cigarettes, for consumption beyond the jurisdiction of the internal-revenue laws of the United States, as defined by section 2197(a) of title 26, shall be deemed exportation within the meaning of the customs and internal-revenue laws applicable to the exportation of such articles without payment of duty or internal-revenue tax.

#### (b) Exportation of supplies for certain vessels and aircraft

The shipment or delivery of any merchandise for use as supplies (including equipment) upon, or in the maintenance or repair of any vessel or aircraft described in subdivision (2) or (3) of section 1309(a) of this title, or for use as ground equipment for any such aircraft, shall be deemed an exportation within the meaning of the customs and internal-revenue laws applicable to the exportation of such merchandise without the payment of duty or internal-revenue tax. With respect to merchandise for use as ground equipment, such shipment or delivery shall not be deemed an exportation within the meaning of the internal-revenue laws relating to taxes other than those imposed upon or by reason of importation.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title III, §317, 46 Stat. 696; June 25, 1938, ch. 679, §5(b), 52 Stat. 1081; Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §11(b), 67 Stat. 514.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2197(a) of title 26, referred to in subsec. (a), is a reference to section 2197(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which was repealed by section 7851 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Amendments

1953—Subsec. (b). Act Aug. 8, 1953, extended to foreign vessels the exemption from payment of duty and internal revenue tax theretofore available for supplies used in the maintenance or repair of aircraft; and provided an exemption for ground equipment for foreign-flag aircraft from duties and taxes imposed on, by reason of, importation.

1938—Act June 25, 1938, amended section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1953 Amendment; Savings Provision

Amendment by act Aug. 8, 1953, effective on and after thirtieth day following Aug. 8, 1953, and savings provision, see notes set out under section 1304 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1938 Amendment

Amendment by act June 25, 1938, effective on thirtieth day following June 25, 1938, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 37 of act June 25, 1938, set out as a note under section 1401 of this title.

#### Repeals

Insofar as subsec. (a) of this section related exclusively to Internal Revenue it was repealed and incorporated as section 2197(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. See section 4(a) of enacting sections of Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Section 2197(b) of I. R. C. 1939 was replaced by section 5704(b) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.