alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ CHARLES E. ALLEN, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent

______________________

2018

- 1649

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0752

- 08

- 0343 -I- 1.

______________________

Before P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and R EYNA , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

. ORDER
On September 26, 2018, we issued to the parties an order to show cause why Charles E. Allen’s petition for review should not be dismissed as untimely. Specifically, we noted that Allen’s petition for review was filed 72 days from the date of the letter that Allen seeks this court to review. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) , Allen’s petition should have been filed 60 days from the date of the letter.ALLEN v. MSPB 2

On October 19, 2018, the Board filed its response, a rguing that the petition for revi ew is untimely under § 7703(b)(1)(A). On October 25, 2018, Allen filed a motion for continuance to show cause, explaining that he secured legal counsel and needed additional time for counsel to review the case and prepare a response. The court gran ted Al len’s request.

O n November 30, 2018, Allen

, now represented by counsel

, filed a response making two arguments

. First, Allen maintains that the court’s order to show cause is unclear as to the basis relied on by this court for its timeliness concerns. Sec ond, Allen urges that “[f]undamental fairness requires the court to look beyond the technical application of statutory rules regarding ‘time’ and grant [his] request for judicial review. ” Pet. Response at 3. Both arguments are without merit.

In the order to show cause, we identified the specific factual and legal basis giving rise to the concern of whether Allen’s petition is timely filed. Allen does not challenge that basis or offer an alternative by which this court should determine if the filing date of the petition satisfies § 7703(b)(1)(A). Allen’s principal argument is that it would be unfair to rely on “a mere technicality to deny [his] request for review.” Pet. Response at 3. But Allen fails to provide any legal basis that allows this court
to forgo the requirements of § 7703(b)(1)(A)

. See Oja v. Dep’t of the Army , 405 F.3d 1349, 13 58

– 60 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (holding compliance with the filing deadline of § 7703(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling and is a prerequisite to our exercise of jurisdiction ) ; Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 848 F.3d 1013, 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (citing Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp. , 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984))

. Accordingly

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT :ALLEN v. MSPB 3

(1) The petition for review is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

December 11, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 228

 218

 160

 159

 155

 178

 178

 167

 151

 144

 141

 143

 200

 229

 237

 228

 232

 240

 252

 249

 249

 259

 254

 259

 259

 265

 271

 281

 277

 273

 278

 196

 153

 147

 131

 135

 144

 160

 143

 131

 121

 119

 119

 128

 200

 219

 198

 198

 223

 240

 239

 236

 246

 233

 232

 222

 228

 241

 221

 237

 228

 238

 210

 165

 155

 148

 148

 162

 167

 152

 140

 131

 128

 128

 169

 218

 226

 221

 215

 231

 245

 244

 243

 251

 246

 249

 246

 249

 257

 253

 259

 255

 261

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 146

 118

 112

 107

 107

 116

 119

 110

 103

 97

 95

 95

 120

 151

 156

 153

 149

 159

 167

 167

 166

 171

 168

 170

 168

 170

 175

 172

 176

 174

 177

TOTAL 6,372

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,879

 1,813

 1,542

 2,160

 1,898

 1,385

 837

 944

 927

 428

 937

 1,093

 1,550

 1,697

 1,654

 2,298

 1,932

 1,358

 1,522

 1,214

 740

 622

 925

 880

 1,159

 749

 1,602

 1,278

 894

 903

 1,181

 222

 209

 215

 206

 215

 192

 199

 188

 172

 160

 167

 168

 170

 154

 185

 209

 184

 189

 212

 216

 195

 203

 183

 173

 160

 169

 175

 184

 210

 226

 243

 419

 400

 432

 511

 449

 373

 301

 317

 241

 203

 230

 250

 323

 368

 396

 538

 516

 373

 377

 341

 287

 277

 276

 253

 248

 225

 283

 323

 332

 331

 350

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,130

 4,530

 4,962

 5,473

 5,475

 5,216

 5,085

 5,036

 4,973

 4,897

 4,851

 4,808

 4,816

 4,817

 4,794

 4,932

 5,016

 4,878

 4,806

 4,774

 4,760

 4,720

 4,755

 4,805

 4,823

 4,798

 4,758

 4,713

 4,649

 4,442

 4,276

 295

 324

 354

 391

 391

 373

 363

 360

 355

 350

 347

 343

 344

 344

 342

 352

 358

 348

 343

 341

 340

 337

 340

 343

 345

 343

 340

 337

 332

 317

 305

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,135

 1,872

 600

 637

 648

 496

 330

 303

 283

 315

 276

 242

 249

 254

 277

 296

 290

 296

 471

 553

 1,057

 1,066

 1,391

 1,248

 1,339

 1,572

 1,339

 1,211

 1,448

 1,595

 1,578

 520

 393

 350

 339

 315

 297

 267

 251

 230

 214

 215

 220

 233

 234

 235

 227

 228

 225

 226

 235

 269

 278

 298

 316

 340

 348

 349

 340

 339

 324

 332

 939

 647

 410

 378

 358

 336

 298

 273

 254

 261

 232

 228

 240

 244

 249

 252

 248

 242

 266

 303

 378

 420

 444

 464

 532

 581

 526

 502

 611

 590

 553

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,197

 8,486

 8,554

 8,589

 8,583

 8,580

 8,506

 8,337

 8,043

 7,713

 7,248

 6,672

 5,947

 5,098

 4,408

 4,013

 3,851

 3,715

 3,623

 3,590

 3,670

 3,817

 4,007

 4,210

 4,510

 4,863

 5,149

 5,407

 5,769

 6,107

 6,412

 586

 606

 611

 614

 613

 613

 608

 596

 575

 551

 518

 477

 425

 364

 315

 287

 275

 265

 259

 256

 262

 273

 286

 301

 322

 347

 368

 386

 412

 436

 458

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### Geology of the Rattlesnake quadrangle Bearpaw Mountains, Blaine County, Montana

By: B. C. Hearn Jr.W. T. PecoraW. C. Swadley

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geology of the northern half of the Rattlesnake quadrangle, Bearpaw Mountains, Montana(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Bexar County Public Defender’s Office

Paul Elizondo Tower  101 W. Nueva St., Suite 310  San Antonio, TX 78205 

Phone: (210) 335-0701  Fax: (210) 335-0707

May 19, 2015

Honorable Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

Fourth Court of Appeals

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa St., Suite 3200

San Antonio, TX 78205 

Re: Julio Alejandro Zuniga v. The State of Texas

 Appeal No. 04-15-00245-CR

 Trial Court Case No. 2014CR0936

RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER

Dear Mr. Hottle: 

On May 18, 2015, the Court ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. This letter is Appellant’s response to 

that order.

This appeal should not be dismissed.

On October 14, 2014, Appellant was sentenced by the trial court in case number 

2014CR0936. The trial court certified that Appellant has the right of appeal. No notice of 

appeal or motion for new trial was filed within 30 days of sentencing.

Appellant filed a writ under case number 2014CR0936-W1 seeking the right to file an 

out-of-time notice of appeal in case number 2014CR0936. He was successful. The Court 

of Criminal Appeals granted relief and directed Appellant to file his notice of appeal with 

the trial court clerk by May 1, 2015.

On April 20, 2015, Appellant timely filed his pro se notice of appeal in case 2014CR0936

(the underlying criminal case). This court assigned Case No. 04-15-00245-CR to the 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00245-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/19/2015 11:54:37 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/19/2015 11:54:37 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
appeal. The undersigned filed the designation of the record and request for the 

reporter’s record with the clerk of the trial court on April 17, 2015. The clerk’s record 

was filed with this Court on April 28, 2015. The undersigned filed his docketing 

statement on May 1, 2015. 

The Appellant, through undersigned counsel, intends to proceed with this appeal. It 

should NOT be dismissed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.

RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.

Assistant Public Defender

Cc: Rico Valdez

Appellate Chief

Bexar County District Attorney’s Office

101 W. Nueva St., Suite 710

San Antonio, TX 78205

(Via electronic service to Jeanette Canales)
#### § 682.415 [Reserved]
§ 656.4 What types of Centers receive grants? The Secretary awards grants to Centers that— ( a ) Focus on— ( 1 ) A single country or on a world area (such as East Asia, Africa, or the Middle East) and offer instruction in the principal language or languages of that country or area and those disciplinary fields necessary to provide a full understanding of the country or area; or
( 2 ) International studies or the international aspects of contemporary issues or topics (such as international business or energy) while providing instruction in modern foreign languages; and
( b ) Provide training at the— ( 1 ) Graduate, professional, and undergraduate levels, as a comprehensive Center; or
( 2 ) Undergraduate level only, as an undergraduate Center.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
EX-99.1

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Greenhold Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, John
Harris, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Greenhold Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) 	such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Golf Product Technologies, Inc.

                                 By:  John Harris

                                 /s/ John Harris
                                 ----------------------
                                 President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James G. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES G. CLARK
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                 |  | James G. Clark         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 27—CUSTOMS**

Sec.
541.
Entry of goods falsely classified.
542.
Entry of goods by means of false statements.
543.
Entry of goods for less than legal duty.
544.
Relanding of goods.
545.
Smuggling goods into the United States.
546.
Smuggling goods into foreign countries.
547.
Depositing goods in buildings on boundaries.
548.
Removing or repacking goods in warehouses.
549.
Removing goods from customs custody; breaking seals.
550.
False claim for refund of duties.
551.
Concealing or destroying invoices or other papers.
552.
Officers aiding importation of obscene or treasonous books and articles.
553.
Importation or exportation of stolen motor vehicles, off-highway mobile equipment, vessels, or aircraft.
554.
Smuggling goods from the United States.
555.
Border tunnels and passages.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2007**—Pub. L. 110–161, div. E, title V, §553(a)(2), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2082, added item 555 and struck out item 554 "Border tunnels and passages".

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–295, title V, §551(b), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1390, added item 554 "Border tunnels and passages".

Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §311(b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 242, added item 554 "Smuggling goods from the United States".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–547, title III, §301(b), Oct. 25, 1984, 98 Stat. 2771, added item 553.
Andrea Davison, Esq. (VSB No. 78036) 

Stephen D. Caruso, Esq. (VSB No. 87376) 

BEAN, KINNEY & KORMAN, P.C. 

2311 Wilson Blvd., Suite 500 

Arlington, Virginia 22201 

(703) 525-4000 

(703) 525-2207 (Fax) 

adavison@beankinney.com 

scaruso@beankinney.com 

Counsel for KrazRock Group, LLC 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 

In re: 

 

BRIAN THOMAS SAPP, 

 

Debtor. 

Case No. 18-12794-BFK 

Chapter 7 

Adv. Proc. No. 18-01111-BFK 

KRAZROCK GROUP, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

BRIAN THOMAS SAPP, 

Respondent. 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

 KrazRock Group, LLC (the “Plaintiff”), by undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7055 and Local 

Bankruptcy Rule 7055-1(A), hereby moves for entry of default against defendant Brian Thomas 

Sapp in the above-captioned Adversary Proceeding, and, in accordance with Local Bankruptcy 

Rule 7055-1(A), submits the attached Declaration in support. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Clerk, in consultation with the 

Court, enter default against the Defendant in the above-captioned Adversary Proceeding. 

Case 18-01111-BFK Doc 7 Filed 12/19/18 Entered 12/19/18 14:56:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Dated: December 19, 2018 

 /s/ Andrea Campbell Davison________

 Andrea Campbell Davison (VSB No. 78036) 

 Stephen D. Caruso (VSB No. 87376) 

 BEAN, KINNEY & KORMAN, P.C. 

 2311 Wilson Blvd., Suite 500 

 Arlington, Virginia 22201 

 (703) 525-4000 

 (703) 525-2207 (Fax) 

 adavison@beankinney.com 

scaruso@beankinney.com 

 Counsel for KrazRock Group, LLC 

Case 18-01111-BFK Doc 7 Filed 12/19/18 Entered 12/19/18 14:56:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 127

 127

 127

 127

 122

 119

 117

 115

 114

 113

 108

 105

 105

 103

 106

 112

 113

 114

 119

 122

 122

 123

 123

 124

 126

 127

 128

 131

 131

 132

 122

 124

 120

 113

 110

 107

 104

 106

 103

 102

 100

 99

 98

 98

 101

 105

 109

 108

 112

 116

 115

 116

 119

 121

 123

 124

 124

 124

 122

 120

 125

 125

 123

 119

 116

 113

 109

 109

 109

 106

 103

 101

 100

 100

 103

 108

 111

 113

 115

 118

 120

 120

 121

 123

 124

 125

 126

 126

 126

 126

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,804

 1,803

 1,798

 1,789

 1,780

 1,769

 1,754

 1,736

 1,716

 1,690

 1,657

 1,622

 1,587

 1,558

 1,536

 1,519

 1,507

 1,501

 1,500

 1,505

 1,516

 1,527

 1,539

 1,556

 1,577

 1,601

 1,627

 1,653

 1,676

 1,694

 129

 129

 128

 128

 127

 126

 125

 124

 123

 121

 118

 116

 113

 111

 110

 109

 108

 107

 107

 108

 108

 109

 110

 111

 113

 114

 116

 118

 120

 121

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# Official Journal C 261/20 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 261 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 October 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 261

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 October 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 261/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 261/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 2 |
| 2005/C 261/3 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 261/4 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 6 |
| 2005/C 261/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3999 — Gazprom/Sibneft) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 261/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.M.3980 — Canon/Canon España) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |
| 2005/C 261/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3939 — Electra/CVC/CPI) (1) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 261/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 261/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2

2005/C 261/3

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

5

2005/C 261/4

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

6

2005/C 261/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3999 — Gazprom/Sibneft) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

2005/C 261/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.M.3980 — Canon/Canon España) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

2005/C 261/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3939 — Electra/CVC/CPI) (1)

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 361.310 What is an affiliated site and what must be provided there? ( a ) An affiliated site, or affiliate one-stop center, is a site that makes available to job seeker and employer customers one or more of the one-stop partners' programs, services, and activities. An affiliated site does not need to provide access to every required one-stop partner program. The frequency of program staff's physical presence in the affiliated site will be determined at the local level. Affiliated sites are access points in addition to the comprehensive one-stop center(s) in each local area. If used by local areas as a part of the service delivery strategy, affiliate sites must be implemented in a manner that supplements and enhances customer access to services.
( b ) As described in § 361.315, Wagner-Peyser Act employment services cannot be a stand-alone affiliated site.
( c ) States, in conjunction with the Local WDBs, must examine lease agreements and property holdings throughout the one-stop delivery system in order to use property in an efficient and effective way. Where necessary and appropriate, States and Local WDBs must take expeditious steps to align lease expiration dates with efforts to consolidate one-stop operations into service points where Wagner-Peyser Act employment services are colocated as soon as reasonably possible. These steps must be included in the State Plan.
( d ) All affiliated sites must be physically and programmatically accessible to individuals with disabilities, as described in 29 CFR part 38, the implementing regulations of WIOA sec. 188.