alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1588. Transportation between American ports via foreign ports

If any merchandise is laden at any port or place in the United States upon any vessel belonging wholly or in part to a subject of a foreign country, and is taken thence to a foreign port or place to be reladen and reshipped to any other port in the United States, either by the same or by another vessel, foreign or American, with intent to evade the provisions relating to the transportation of merchandise from one port or place of the United States to another port or place of the United States in a vessel belonging wholly or in part to a subject of any foreign power, the merchandise shall, on its arrival at such last-named port or place, be seized and forfeited to the United States, and the vessel shall pay a tonnage duty of 50 cents per net ton.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §588, 46 Stat. 749.)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 515 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 

the deduction for certain State, local, and foreign taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Mr. ROSE of New York, 

Mr. BRINDISI, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. TED LIEU of California, 

Ms. BASS, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. SIRES, Ms. 

SCANLON, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. CORREA, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. SHERMAN, Mrs. 

TORRES of California, and Mr. GOTTHEIMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the limitation on the deduction for certain State, local, 

and foreign taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State And Local Tax 

5 Deduction Fairness Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 515 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR CER2 TAIN STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAXES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

5 (6). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
----

EXHIBIT 31.2

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Chris Stringer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ActionView  International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for the small business issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and  procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed  under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small  business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small  business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change  in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that  occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the  small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and  the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and  material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the  small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 16, 2007

/s/ Christopher Stringer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3183

_____________________________
J OHN J. D IGLIO ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Origina l Jurisdiction

.

October 15 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied as the P etitioner fails to allege that he made a timely request of counsel to file an appeal on his behalf and that counsel failed to do so. See State v. Trowell , 7 39 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1999).

R OBERTS , R OWE , and R AY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

John J. Diglio, pro se
, Pet itioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
§ 463.700 What are the one-stop infrastructure costs? ( a ) Infrastructure costs of one-stop centers are nonpersonnel costs that are necessary for the general operation of the one-stop center, including: ( 1 ) Rental of the facilities;
( 2 ) Utilities and maintenance;
( 3 ) Equipment (including assessment-related products and assistive technology for individuals with disabilities); and
( 4 ) Technology to facilitate access to the one-stop center, including technology used for the center's planning and outreach activities.
( b ) Local WDBs may consider common identifier costs as costs of one-stop infrastructure.
( c ) Each entity that carries out a program or activities in a local one-stop center, described in §§ 463.400 through 463.410, must use a portion of the funds available for the program and activities to maintain the one-stop delivery system, including payment of the infrastructure costs of one-stop centers. These payments must be in accordance with this subpart; Federal cost principles, which require that all costs must be allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable to the program; and all other applicable legal requirements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 674

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 674 appear at 65 FR 18002, 18003, Apr. 6, 2000.

#### § 674.54 [Reserved]
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 14a0488n.06

Case No. 13-5167

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS LITTLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF 

KENTUCKY

BEFORE: MOORE, SUTTON and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges. 

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Travis Little pleaded guilty to possessing around 20 grams of 

crack cocaine, and in February 2008, the district court sentenced him to serve five years in prison

for that offense—the statutory minimum sentence at the time—on top of five years for a related 

firearms charge. Two years later, Congress eliminated the statutory minimum for Little’s crackcocaine offense in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Little sought to take advantage of the 

change by requesting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in district court, but to 

no avail. He now presses his claim for relief under § 3582(c)(2) on appeal.

 

 The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Case No. 13-5167

United States v. Little

2

While Little’s appeal was pending, our court decided United States v. Blewett, 746 F.3d 

647 (6th Cir. 2013) (en banc). Unfortunately for Little, this decision forecloses all three 

arguments he presses on appeal: that the Fair Sentencing Act applies retroactively to defendants 

sentenced before its passage; that denying Little a sentence reduction violates the Equal 

Protection Clause; and that Little’s sentence violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition 

against cruel and unusual punishment. Id. at 650–60. Little recognizes that Blewett binds this 

panel and dictates affirmance. He wishes only to preserve these arguments for review by a 

higher tribunal, as he is entitled to do.

For these reasons, we affirm.
#### James B. Kilsheimer, Jr., Respondent, v. Louis Kendal and Others, Defendants, and Caroline S. Stetler (a Defendant) and George W. Herbert (not a Party to this Action), Appellants.

Motion for reargument of motion for stay granted, and motion set down for hearing on the first day of the December term. Motion to dismiss appeal granted "as to George W. Herbert, and reserved as to Caroline S. Stetler until the first day of the December term, when it is ordered to be heard with the appeal. Present —Burr, Thomas, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
AERO AIR at the 

PORTLAND-HILLSBORO AIRPORT 

2050 NE 25TH AVENUE 

HILLSBORO, OR 97124 

TOLL FREE 800.448.2376 

TEL 503.640.3711 

FAX 503.681.6513 

WWW.AEROAIR.COM 

December 15, 2014 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Exemption No. 10043B, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-10283 

Dear Sir I Maam: 

Aero Air, LLC, the parent company of Corsair Two, LLC, requested and received exemption 10043B, 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-10283 to allow Aero Air to conduct flights without a flight engineer as 

required per CFR 91.529(a)(1) on its DC-7 /DC-7B aircraft (registration Nos. N401US, N6353C, and 

N838D). 

This exemption is currently set to expire on May 31, 2015. Aero Air requests that this exemption be 

renewed beginning May 1, 2015 in order to facilitate the use of this exemption during the 2015 fire 

season and beyond without interruption. Not having this exemption in place could place undue time 

constraints on locating and training appropriate personnel in order to be available for the 2015 fire 

fighting season. 

If a flight engineer were to be mandated their services would be needed for only two or three weeks each year and 

there is no way he could maintain the currency requirements, so an annual flight check would be required. This 

would create an economic burden that would be detrimental to the costs passed to the customer/taxpayer. 

Granting this request would be in the public interest because our services are paid for by taxes through public 

agencies. If we can keep our costs at a minimum, we can provide service at a lower cost to the government. 

We would appreciate prompt consideration of this request to allow our transition into Spring training as we 

complete the annual maintenance on the aircraft. 

Please contact me at Aero Air should you have any additional questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, -~"J 3&<-<-<' I - ~- steve Boyce 

Director of Maintenance 

Aero Air, LLC
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00833

- CV

IN RE Christopher BURDICK

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

This court believes a serious qu estion concerning the mandamus relief sought requires

furth er consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and real part y in interest may

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than January 6, 2020

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of A ppellate Proc edure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on December 18, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTEST ED TO: _____________________________

Michael A . Cruz,

C lerk of Court

1 This proceedin g arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 00691 , style d In the Inte rest of A.A.B. and C.C.B., Minor

Children , pending in the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas , the Honorable Peter Sakai presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                           3,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                       575
<INVENTORY>                                     37,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,681
<PP&E>                                          27,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,515
<SALES>                                        291,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          206,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       109
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (10.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.74)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of RadNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Howard G. Berger, M.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.




/s/   Howard G. Berger, M.D.Howard G. Berger, M.D.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)March 11, 2011


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
           THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE  SHEET OF HFAR REACH  HOLDINGS LTD. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

November 2016

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,103 4,083 9,186 10,122 8,099 18,221 0.0 0.0

2-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,103 4,078 9,181 10,122 8,089 18,211 0.0 0.0

3-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 5,746 4,065 9,811 11,398 8,063 19,461 0.0 0.0

4-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,383 4,066 10,449 12,661 8,065 20,726 0.0 0.0

5-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,326 4,199 10,525 12,548 8,328 20,876 0.0 0.0

6-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,586 4,412 10,999 13,064 8,752 21,816 0.0 0.0

7-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,570 4,244 10,814 13,032 8,417 21,449 0.0 0.0

8-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,198 4,250 10,448 12,293 8,430 20,723 0.0 0.0

9-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,528 3,734 8,262 8,981 7,407 16,388 0.0 0.0

10-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,459 2,816 7,275 8,844 5,585 14,429 0.0 0.0

11-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,093 2,542 6,635 8,118 5,042 13,160 0.0 0.0

12-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,542 2,043 5,586 7,026 4,053 11,079 0.0 0.0

13-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,950 975 3,925 5,852 1,934 7,786 0.0 0.0

14-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,996 975 3,971 5,943 1,933 7,876 0.0 0.0

15-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,457 975 3,432 4,873 1,934 6,807 0.0 0.0

16-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,041 976 3,017 4,049 1,935 5,984 0.0 0.0

17-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,804 976 3,779 5,561 1,935 7,496 0.0 0.0

18-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,519 972 4,491 6,979 1,928 8,907 0.0 0.0

19-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,098 977 2,075 2,178 1,937 4,115 0.0 0.0

20-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,663 977 3,640 5,283 1,937 7,220 0.0 0.0

21-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,812 976 3,788 5,578 1,935 7,513 0.0 0.0

22-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,058 1,825 6,883 10,033 3,620 13,653 0.0 0.0

23-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,528 2,578 9,106 12,948 5,114 18,062 0.0 0.0

24-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,587 2,578 9,166 13,066 5,114 18,180 0.0 0.0

25-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,583 2,577 9,160 13,057 5,112 18,169 0.0 0.0

26-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,578 2,588 9,167 13,048 5,134 18,182 0.0 0.0

27-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,572 3,659 10,230 13,035 7,257 20,292 0.0 0.0

28-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,582 3,651 10,233 13,056 7,241 20,297 0.0 0.0

29-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,990 3,658 10,648 13,865 7,256 21,121 0.0 0.0

30-Nov-16 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 6,707 3,666 10,373 13,304 7,271 20,575 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 6 0 6 XXXX 0 0 146,164 80,089 226,254 289,917 158,857 448,774 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP CVP
### **CHAPTER 50A—GENOCIDE**

Sec.
1091.
Genocide.
1092.
Exclusive remedies.
1093.
Definitions.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.111 General. ( a ) Bonds on TTB Form 5154.3 shall be terminated by the appropriate TTB officer, as to liability on drawback allowed after a specified future date, in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Pursuant to a notice by the surety as provided in § 17.112.
( 2 ) Following approval of a superseding bond, as provided in § 17.108.
( 3 ) Following notification by the principal of an intent to discontinue the filing of claims on a monthly basis.
( b ) However, the bond shall not be terminated until all outstanding liability under it has been discharged. Upon termination, the appropriate TTB officer shall mark the bond “canceled,” followed by the date of cancellation, and shall issue a notice of termination of bond. A copy of this notice shall be given to the principal and to each surety.