alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00309 - CV

VICTOR FONSECA AND R IG CLEANERS, LLC APPELLANTS

V. PEGGY SUE BISHOP, AS EXECUTRIX OF ESTATE OF CHARLES T. BLISH, IN THE RIGHT OF RIG CLEANERS, LLC , AND THE ESTATE OF CHA RLES T. BLISH, INDIVIDUALLY APPELLEE

---------- FROM PROBATE COURT N O. 2 OF TARRANT COUN TY TRIAL COURT NO. 2013

- PR01571

- 2

- A

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellants Victor Fonseca and Rig Cleaners, LLC attempt to pursue a restricted appeal from the trial court’s default judgment in favor of Appellee

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 Peggy Sue Bishop, Executrix of the E state of Charles T. Blish, in the Right of Rig Cleaners, LLC , and the Estate of Charles T. Blish, Individually . The trial court’s default judgment was signed March 7, 201 4 . The notice of restricted appeal was therefore due within six months, 2 that is, by September 8, 2014, or, if accompanied by a motion for extension of time , within six months and fifteen days, 3 that is, by September 23, 2014. Appellants did not file their notice of appeal until September 25, 2014, outside the deadline

. Accordingly, on September 26, 2014 , we notified Appellants of our concern that we might not have jurisdiction over the appeal and informed them that unless they or any party d esiring to continue the appeal filed with this court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal , this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 4 In response, Appellants filed a late motion for extension of time on September 30, 2014. Appellee filed an objection and response to the motion, seeking dismissal of the appeal.

“ [ O ] nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time

. . . has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.” 5 The

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(c), 30.

3 See Tex. R. App. 4.1(a ), 26.3, 30; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 61 7 (Tex. 1997) ; King v. State , No. 05

– 03

– 00936

– CV, 2003 WL 21710523, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas July 24, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.

5 Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 61 7

.3 times for fili ng a notice of appeal are jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or an extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. 6 Because neither appellants ’ motion for extension of time nor the ir notice of appeal was timely filed, we dismiss the motion, and we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 7

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 16, 2014

6 See id. at 617; see also Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.3

. 7 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.
§ 601.11 Private education loan disclosures and self-certification form. ( a ) A covered institution, or an institution-affiliated organization of such covered institution, that provides information regarding a private education loan from a lender to a prospective borrower must provide private education loan disclosures to the prospective borrower, regardless of whether the covered institution or institution-affiliated organization participates in a preferred lender arrangement.
( b ) The private education loan disclosures must— ( 1 ) Provide the prospective borrower with the information the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System requires to be disclosed under section 128(e)(1) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1638(e)(1)) for such loan;
( 2 ) Inform the prospective borrower that— ( i ) The prospective borrower may qualify for loans or other assistance under title IV of the HEA; and
( ii ) The terms and conditions of Title IV, HEA program loans may be more favorable than the provisions of private education loans.
( c ) The covered institution or institution-affiliated organization must ensure that information regarding private education loans is presented in such a manner as to be distinct from information regarding Title IV, HEA program loans.
( d ) Upon an enrolled or admitted student applicant's request for a private education loan self-certification form, an institution must provide to the applicant, in written or electronic form— ( 1 ) The self-certification form for private education loans developed by the Secretary in consultation with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, to satisfy the requirements of section 128(e)(3) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1638(e)(3)); and
( 2 ) The information required to complete the form, to the extent the institution possesses such information as specified in 34 CFR 668.14(b)(29).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-XXXA) (Authority:20 U.S.C. 1019a(a)(1)(B) and 1019d)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5154 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5154

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include geothermal energy 
                    in the 30 percent energy credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2019

 Mr. Horsford (for himself, Mr. Higgins of New York, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. 
 Suozzi, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Panetta, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Blumenauer, and Ms. 
    Moore) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include geothermal energy 
                    in the 30 percent energy credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Geothermal Energy Opportunity Act of 
2019'' or the ``GEO Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF GEOTHERMAL IN 30 PERCENT ENERGY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 48(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 are each amended by striking ``paragraph (3)(A)(i)'' and 
inserting ``clause (i) or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)''.
    (b) Phaseout.--Section 48(a) of such Code is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Phaseout for geothermal.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), in 
                the case of any energy property described in paragraph 
                (3)(A)(iii) the construction of which begins before 
                January 1, 2027, the energy percentage determined under 
                paragraph (2) shall be equal to--
                            ``(i) in the case of any property the 
                        construction of which begins after December 31, 
                        2024, and before January 1, 2026, 26 percent, 
                        and
                            ``(ii) in the case of any property the 
                        construction of which begins after December 31, 
                        2025, and before January 1, 2027, 22 percent.
                    ``(B) Placed in service deadline.--In the case of 
                any energy property described in paragraph (3)(A)(iii) 
                the construction of which begins before January 1, 
                2027, and which is not placed in service before January 
                1, 2029, the energy percentage determined under 
                paragraph (2) shall be equal to 10 percent.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to periods after December 31, 2019, under rules similar to the 
rules of section 48(m) as in effect on the day before the date of the 
enactment of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[DESCRIPTION]EXHIBIT 27
[TEXT]

                 <S><C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-31-2000
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,432
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                 69,450
<COMMON>                                    44,128
<OTHER-SE>                                (131,010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    0
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.00)







</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,194.91

 1,194.92

 1,194.93

 1,194.94

 1,194.97

 1,194.98

 1,194.99

 1,195.01

 1,195.24

 1,195.39

 1,195.50

 1,195.60

 1,195.69

 1,195.77

 1,195.85

 1,195.93

 1,196.01

 1,196.09

 1,196.13

 1,196.18

 1,196.23

 1,196.34

 1,196.49

 1,196.64

 1,196.82

 1,196.96

 1,197.11

 1,197.23

 1,197.38

 1,197.51

 1,197.65

 42.66

 42.68

 42.70

 42.71

 42.76

 42.78

 42.79

 42.83

 43.20

 43.45

 43.63

 43.80

 43.95

 44.08

 44.22

 44.35

 44.49

 44.62

 44.69

 44.77

 44.86

 45.04

 45.29

 45.55

 45.86

 46.10

 46.35

 46.56

 46.82

 47.04

 47.29

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.05

+0.02

+0.02

+0.03

+0.38

+0.25

+0.18

+0.17

+0.15

+0.13

+0.13

+0.13

+0.13

+0.13

+0.07

+0.08

+0.09

+0.19

+0.25

+0.26

+0.31

+0.24

+0.26

+0.21

+0.26

+0.23

+0.24

CHANGE

3

12

12

11

28

12

11

19

192

127

95

86

79

71

72

72

70

71

40

46

47

97

130

132

158

124

132

107

136

116

128

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 3

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 2

 3

 3

 3

 1

 2

 5

 3

 3

 3

 1

 2

 3

 2

 1

 2

 4

 2

 4

C.F.S.

 .03

 .04

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .01

 .04

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .07

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .22

 1.56

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .44

 .01

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2018 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/01/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.65 2,436 31 0 70 1.26 2.80

ACRE-FEET +4,650 4,832 61 0 139

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 61

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.80

JULY 1, 2017 3.75

 42.66

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 3.75
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


        SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON AND COMMON
                                EQUIVALENT SHARE

                                                                   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                   -------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1996                1995                 1994
                                                   ---------------    -----------------    ---------------

<S>                                                <C>                <C>                   <C>           
Net income (loss)                                  $    806,000       $  (2,336,000)        $  (1,477,000)
                                                   ------------       --------------        --------------

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period                        13,461,602           12,352,235            10,554,228

Add:       Common equivalent shares
           determined using the "Treasury
           Stock" Method representing
           shares issuable upon exercise of
           stock options and warrants.                  437,991                   --                    --
                                                   ------------          -----------       ---------------

Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding                 13,899,593           12,352,235            10,554,228
                                                   ------------       --------------       ---------------


Earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent
share                                              $        .06        $        (.19)      $         (.14)
                                                   ============       ===============      ==============
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 17, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7543 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 12,471.

#### Cherokee Realty Company *v.*Allen.

Decided December 9, 1929.

Messrs. Pershing, Nye, Tallmadge & Bosworth, Mr. Lewis A. Dick, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Rees D. Rees, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Alter

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Edmund A. Allen, doing business as the Allen Realty Company, brought suit in tbe district court to recover a judgment in tbe sum of $750 for services rendered by him in effectuating an exchange of real estate belonging to tbe Cherokee Realty Company, a corporation, for California real estate.

Tbe case was tried to tbe court without tbe intervention of a jury, and upon tbe conclusion of all tbe evidence and arguments, judgment was rendered in favor of tbe plain*492tiff and against the defendant for the sum, of $768.67 and costs. The defendant prosecutes this writ, applies for a supersedeas, and assigns as error the general grounds that the judgment is contrary to and not supported by the law and evidence.

It is alleged by the plaintiff, and,admitted by the defendant, that the plaintiff is a duly licensed real estate broker; that the defendant employed the plaintiff .to'-, effectuate an exchange of property; that through the'efforts of the plaintiff, the exchange was consummated, and that the plaintiff was entitled to an agreed compensation of $750 for his services. The plaintiff alleges that the compensation was to be paid in cash, while - the defendant alleged another method of payment.

The evidence upon the only question in dispute was in sharp conflict; there was competent evidence before the court upon which to base its judgment, and, under the well established and oft announced decisions. o,f this court, we are not at liberty to disturb it. The citation of authorities should be unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Me. Chief Justice Whiteord, Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Adams concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI                    
|Manouch Moshayedi Chief Executive
Officer



November 11, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION  I, Xiaojing Yu, certify that:    1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;   4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have;   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and   5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  By:  /s/ Xiaojing YuXiaojing Yu
Chief Executive Officer
April 17, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 421

 428

 419

 417

 401

 382

 416

 379

 390

 457

 473

 439

 496

 510

 543

 511

 502

 535

 515

 515

 387

 473

 500

 539

 509

 645

 608

 557

 603

 593

 625

 165

 175

 176

 182

 182

 182

 186

 186

 183

 181

 174

 176

 177

 174

 173

 179

 178

 180

 178

 178

 180

 187

 184

 184

 185

 177

 190

 184

 182

 189

 194

 233

 236

 233

 230

 232

 234

 239

 236

 233

 225

 223

 219

 230

 240

 227

 233

 230

 227

 233

 243

 231

 226

 222

 239

 230

 257

 265

 260

 259

 271

 280

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 160

 162

 160

 158

 159

 161

 164

 162

 160

 155

 154

 151

 158

 164

 156

 160

 158

 156

 160

 166

 159

 156

 153

 164

 158

 175

 180

 177

 176

 183

 189

TOTAL 7,376

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS