alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M o n t a n a

W y o m i n g

Powder River County

idan County

pbell County

Rosebud County

Big

H

o

r

n

C

o

u

nty

P

o

w

d

e

r

Riv

e

r

C

o

u

nty

Campbell County

Sheridan County

Rosebud County

Powder River County

Big Horn County

P o

w

d e

r

R i v

e

r

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

Otter

Creek

R

o

s

e

b

u

d

Cr

e

e

k

Powder

River

Cook Creek

Hanging

Woman

Creek

Bear

Creek

Trail Creek

Squirrel Creek

Indian Creek

Tenmile Creek

Badger Creek

Pumpkin

Creek

Bitter Creek

Tongue

River

Reservoir

Crow

Reservation

Northern Cheyenne

Reservation

Custer

National

Forest

Birney

Decker

Quietus

Mountain Plover Habitat within the WMPP Focus Area

Areas Evaluated for Potential

Mountain Plover Habitat

by Greystone

Greystone Mountain Plover

Survey Areas

Suitable Mountain Plover Habitat

Delineated by Fidelity

Big Sky Conservation Institute

Modeled Potential Mountain

Plover Habitat

Fidelity Mountain Plover

Survey Areas

Town

Intermittent Stream

Stream

River

Tongue River Reservoir

WMPP Focus Area

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Lands

US Forest Service Lands

County Boundary

State Boundary

0 5 10 15 20

Miles

0 10 20

Kilometers

Scale: 1:288,000

Projection: UTM Zone 13, NAD 83

Base Map: ESRI Corp. Shaded Relief

Rosebud, Big Horn and

Powder River Counties, Montana

1043 Coffeen Avenue, Suite D

Sheridan, WY 82801

(307) 673-4303
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 755 731 749 479

2 756 743 749 479

3 746 724 740 473

4 723 717 719 460

5 718 673 706 452

6 706 671 693 444

7 685 649 659 423

8 708 686 693 444

9 736 688 722 462

10 680 621 635 408

11 635 579 609 392

12 577 512 541 350

13 613 512 567 366

14 551 441 478 311

15 465 422 444 290

16 485 444 465 303

17 471 424 446 292

18 467 404 436 285

19 530 428 473 308

20 574 414 470 306

21 602 396 465 303

22 614 406 477 311

23 587 420 494 321

24 548 394 450 294

25 610 421 521 338

26 530 453 511 332

27 509 462 470 306

28 462 413 448 293

Total 15830

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
(No. 73-CC-98

#### Charles W. Huver, Ph.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Attorney General’s Office, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 1, 1973.*

Charles W. Huver, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Homeland Security Network, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter D. Ubaldi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Peter D. UbaldiPeter D.UbaldiChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: April 15, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division

In re: RODERICK DRAYTON KELLY

Debtor

Chapter 13

Case No.: 18-73173-SCS

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS

(Debtor(s) or Creditor(s) name and address) (Amount of dividend)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347 the Trustee herein submits a check payable 

to "Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court" representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of Court into the 

Treasury of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat 

under any state law. The unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due and payable to:

RODERICK DRAYTON KELLY

5559 CAMPUS DRIVE

VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462

$1,578.34 

Michael P. Cotter

Chapter 13 Standing Trustee

870 Greenbrier Circle, Suite 402

Chesapeake, VA 23320

(757) 961-3000

Date: October 18, 2019 /s/ Michael P. Cotter

Case 18-73173-SCS Doc 34 Filed 10/21/19 Entered 10/21/19 08:31:11 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7810]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 53


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Government Property Disposal; 
Forms

CFR Correction

    In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Parts 52 
to 99), revised as of October 1, 2010, on page 527, in Sec.  53.301-
1423, the second Inventory Verification Survey form and the source note 
following it are removed.

[FR Doc. 2011-7810 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
§ 8.4 What procedures are followed in response to a demand for testimony? ( a ) After an employee receives a demand for testimony, the employee shall immediately notify the Secretary and request instructions.
( b ) An employee may not give testimony without the prior written authorization of the Secretary.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary may allow an employee to testify if the Secretary determines that the demand satisfies the requirements of § 8.3 and that granting permission— ( i ) Would be appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the matter in which the demand arises and other applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and
( ii ) Would not be contrary to an interest of the United States, which includes furthering a public interest of the Department and protecting the human and financial resources of the United States.
( 2 ) The Secretary may establish conditions under which the employee may testify.
( d ) If a response to a demand for testimony is required before the Secretary determines whether to allow an employee to testify, the employee or counsel for the employee shall— ( 1 ) Inform the court or other authority of the regulations in this part; and
( 2 ) Request that the demand be stayed pending the employee's receipt of the Secretary's instructions.
( e ) If the court or other authority declines the request for a stay, or rules that the employee must comply with the demand regardless of the Secretary's instructions, the employee or counsel for the employee shall respectfully decline to comply with the demand, citing *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951), and the regulations in this part.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 20 U.S.C. 3474)
John T. Donelan, Esquire

Virginia State Bar No. 18049

125 South Royal Street

Alexandria, Virginia 22314

(703) 684-7555

donelanlaw@gmail.com

Counsel for Philip Jay Fetner

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN RE: )

) Case No. 17-13036-KHK

PHILIP JAY FETNER, ) Chapter 11

)

 Debtor-In-Possession. )

)

DECLARATION OF CONNECTIONS

PURSUANT TO LBR 2014-1

Proposed counsel, John T. Donelan, hereby declares the following connections with the 

Debtor, creditors, other parties in interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the United 

States Trustee, or any person employed in the office of the United States Trustee:

1. with the Debtor: None;

2. with creditors: None;

3. with other parties in interest: None;

4. with their respective attorneys and accountants: None; and

5. with the U.S. Trustee or any person employed in the office of the 

U.S. Trustee: None.

_________October 11, 2017_____________ /s/ John T. Donelan________________ 

DATE JOHN T. DONELAN, ESQUIRE

Case 17-13036-KHK Doc 18 Filed 10/11/17 Entered 10/11/17 13:34:01 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. DONELAN

 /s/ John T. Donelan________________ 

JOHN T. DONELAN, ESQUIRE

Virginia State Bar No. 18049

125 South Royal Street

Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Tel: 703-684-7555

Fax: 703-684-0981

Counsel for Philip Jay Fetner

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 11th day of October, 2017 a true copy of the foregoing 

Declaration of Connections Pursuant to LBR 2014-1 was sent first class mail, postage prepaid, to 

all creditors and parties in interest in this case, as set forth below on the mailing matrix.

Brock & Scott

484 Viking Drive, Suite 203

Virginia Beach, VA 23452-0000

Internal Revenue Service

P.O. Box 8208

Philadelphia, PA 19101-8208

Morrison, Ross and Whelan

31 Garrett Street

Warrenton, VA 20186-0000

FIA Credit Card

P.O. Box 15019

Wilmington, DE 19886-5019

Hotel Street Capital, L.L.C.

c/o Grayson Love & Company

31 Garrett Street

Warrenton, VA 20186-0000

Rose Marie Bogley, et al

c/o Lowry J. Miller, Esquire

10400 Eaton Place, Suite 312

Fairfax, VA 22030-0000

Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

P.O. Box 619063

Dallas, TX 75261-9063

Stephen S. Roszel, VII et al

c/o Robin C. Gulick

70 Main Street, Suite 52

Warrenton, VA 20188-0000

Thomas J. Ross, II, Trustee

31 Garrett Street

Warrenton, VA 20186-0000

Judy A. Robbins, U.S. Trustee

Office of the United States Trustee

115 S. Union Street, Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

Jack I. Frankel, Esquire

Office of the United States Trustee

115 S. Union Street, Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

Robert M. Marino, Esquire

Redmon Peyton & Braswell, LLP

510 King St., Suite 301

Alexandria, VA 22314-3143

HOPS International, Inc.

15105 NW 77th Avenue

Miami Lakes, FL 33014

Mary Forte Goodman

8080 Enon Church Road

The Plains, VA 20198

PJF Limited Partnership

7476 Stoney Hill Lane

The Plains, VA 20198

___/s/ John T. Donelan___________

JOHN T. DONELAN

Case 17-13036-KHK Doc 18 Filed 10/11/17 Entered 10/11/17 13:34:01 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Case 19-34574-KRH    Doc 1261    Filed 03/25/22    Entered 03/25/22 09:20:25    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 2

Case 19-34574-KRH    Doc 1261    Filed 03/25/22    Entered 03/25/22 09:20:25    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 2
#### § 940.3 Definitions.

*Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)* means electronics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination to improve the efficiency or safety of a surface transportation system.

*ITS project* means any project that in whole or in part funds the acquisition of technologies or systems of technologies that provide or significantly contribute to the provision of one or more ITS user services as defined in the National ITS Architecture.

*Major ITS project* means any ITS project that implements part of a regional ITS initiative that is multi-jurisdictional, multi-modal, or otherwise affects regional integration of ITS systems.

*National ITS Architecture* (also “national architecture”) means a common framework for ITS interoperability. The National ITS Architecture comprises the logical architecture and physical architecture which satisfy a defined set of user services. The National ITS Architecture is maintained by the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) and is available on the DOT web site at *http://www.its.dot.gov.*

*Project level ITS architecture* is a framework that identifies the institutional agreement and technical integration necessary to interface a major ITS project with other ITS projects and systems.

*Region* is the geographical area that identifies the boundaries of the regional ITS architecture and is defined by and based on the needs of the participating agencies and other stakeholders. In metropolitan areas, a region should be no less than the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area.

*Regional ITS architecture* means a regional framework for ensuring institutional agreement and technical integration for the implementation of ITS projects or groups of projects.

*Systems engineering* is a structured process for arriving at a final design of a system. The final design is selected from a number of alternatives that would accomplish the same objectives and considers the total life-cycle of the project including not only the technical merits of potential solutions but also the costs and relative value of alternatives.
> Map of DistrictsHome|  Tongass  Maps | Office  Directory
Sun Country Slot Exemption Docket* FAA-2012-0089 

lilnitcd States Senate 

WASHINGTON. DC 20510 

January 30.2012 

0 -'''—1—' I he Honorable Ray Lallood. Seereuiry ^-O—' 

U.S. Dcpartmcmof Transpiralion ' " 

1200 Now Jersey Avenue, SI- 7ci' 

Washingion, DC 20590 

IX-ar Seeretarv Lai lood; 

We wrile in strong support ol'Sun Country's application lor sUn exemptions al the Ronald 

Reagan National Airport (I)C'A). ihe slot cxempiions would allow Sun Country to continue 

serx'iee between Lansing. Ml and Washington. IX". 

Sun Counir>' was origiiialK' awarded two within-periineter slot cNcmptions at DCA in December 

oj'2010. While the airline was not the only applicant to compete lor those slot exemptions, it 

was ihe only applicant that met all ihe criteria .sel forth b\ the Deparimonl of rransix)rlalit>n. In 

this new application. Sun Country continues to meei those criteria and also demonstrates the 

route's viability with nearly a year's worth of supixirlive evidence. Since non-.stop service 

between Lansing and DCA commenced on April 1. 2011, ihe route has proven lo be a success 

with a steady increase of dail\ passengers utilizing the ser\ ice. In addition. Sun Country has 

provided passengers with more options and cheaper fares. Clearh. lra\elers are taking 

advantage of and beneHting from the l.ansing-DCA route. 

In order lo ensure thai this valuable service is not interrupted, we ask for an expeditious re\ iew 

olSun Country's application. We appreciate your consideration oflhis request. IMease do not 

hcsiiaic to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerelv. 

.j8tJt ^^M^^'^^ 

Debbie Slabenow Ciirl Le\in
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Galaxy Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
        I, Matthew J. Symonds, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  November 14, 2005
              /s/
                  Matthew J. SymondsBy:
                  Matthew J. SymondsIts:
                  President
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Galaxy Minerals, Inc. and will be retained by Galaxy Minerals, Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
Summary: Unsubstantiated Allegations of Royalty Fraud 

Report Date: April 21, 2020 Case Number: 18-0758 

We investigated allegations that a gas company underpriced carbon dioxide (CO2) produced 

from Federal leases and deducted unallowable costs from its CO2 production that resulted in a 

potential loss of Federal royalties. 

We did not substantiate the allegations. We found the company’s pricing used to calculate 

royalty payments associated with the sale of CO2 was comparable to competitors. We also found 

the company’s transportation allowances deducted during Federal royalty calculations complied 

with the Government’s permitted threshold. 

This is a summary of a report of investigation issued to the ONRR Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
#### Eastern Banking Company, appellee, v. Anna C. Seeley et al., appellants.

Filed February 9, 1900.

No. 10,919.

Foreclosure Sale: Appraisement: Notice to Owner. The owner of real estate which is about to be sold under a decree of foreclosure is not entitled to notice of the time and place of making the appraisement. See *Maginn v. Piolcard, 57*Nebr., 642.

Appeal from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Sullivan,’J.

*Affirmed.*

*Hamer & Hamer,*for appellants.

*N. P. McDonald*and *McDonald & Squires,*for appellee.

Holcomb, J.

The appellants, defendants in foreclosure proceedings of a real estate mortgage, object to the confirmation of sale upon the sole ground that “no notice was given to the defendants, or either of them, of the time and place of the appraisement, and the said defendants were not permitted to give or produce evidence before the said appraisers concerning the.value of the-said premises.” Upon the authority of *Tillson v. Benschoter,*55 Nebr., 443, *Mills v. Hamer,*55 Nebr., 445, and *Maginn v. Pickard,*57 *677Nebr., 642, this objection can not be sustained. The order of the lower court confirming the sale is, therefore,

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-78]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-78 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: March 30, 2011.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,

Department of Defense.

      ( print page 18732)          ( print page 18733)          ( print page 18734)          ( print page 18735)          ( print page 18736)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2011-7971 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 686.6 Payment from more than one institution.

A student may not receive grant payments under this part concurrently from more than one institution.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
Bankruptcy Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

Adversary Proceeding Case No. 20-03110-KRH 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, David N. Tabakin (name), certify that I am, and at all times during the 

service of process was, not less than 18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was 

made. I further certify that the service of this summons and a copy of the complaint was made 

July 30 2020 (date) by: 

Ix Mail Service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid, addressed to: 

See Exhibit A 

r Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of defendant at: 

r Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at: 

r Certified Mail Service on an Insured Depository Institution: By sending the process by certified mail 

addressed to the following officer of the defendant at: 

r Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly] 

r State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of 

_______________ (name of state), as follows: [Describe briefly] 

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and-correct. 

July 31, 2020 

Date 

Print Name David N. Tabakin 

Tavenner & Beran PLC 20 N, 8th St., 2nd Fl 

Business Address 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Citv State Zio 

Signature 

Case 20-03110-KRH Doc 5 Filed 07/31/20 Entered 07/31/20 14:33:16 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Exhibit A

Texas Growers Supply Alternative Gardening 

c/o TGS Martin, Inc.

c/o Rickie Martin, President

14322 Hartshill Drive

Houston, TX 77044

Case 20-03110-KRH Doc 5 Filed 07/31/20 Entered 07/31/20 14:33:16 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### **[CHAPTER 402—REPEALED]**