#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert W. Duvall, Receiver of the Property of Edward J. Meehan, Respondent, *v.*James H. Cocks and Others, Comprising the Town Board of Oyster Bay, Nassau County, New York, Appellants.

Second Department,

May 25, 1914.

Supplementary proceedings — receiver — title to sums payable to judgment debtor subsequent to supplementary proceedings — appropriation by town to compensate judgment debtor.

A receiver appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution becomes vested only with such property as the judgment debtor had at the time the proceedings were commenced.

Hence, such receiver is not entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring a town board to pay over to Mm sums alleged to be due the judgment debtor by virtue of a resolution adopted by the electorate of the town, if he was appointed receiver prior to said resolution.

Appeal by the defendants, James H. Cocks and others, comprising the town board, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered hi the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 5th day of March, 1914, directing the defendants, as members of the town board of the town of Oyster Bay, to pay to the relator $100 due one Edward J. Meehan, and also from a second order of said court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 28th day of March, 1914, denying defendants’ application for a reargument of the original motion.

*George B. Stoddart,*for the appellants.

*John P. McCarthy,*for the respondent.

Burr, J.:

The members of the town board of Oyster Bay appeal from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue. The order as first entered directed that a peremptory writ issue requiring said board to forthwith pay to relator the sum of $100, the balance due Edward J. Meehan for services rendered to the board of *454assessors of the town of Oyster Bay as clerk during the year 1910, in pursuance of a resolution adopted by the electors of the town at a town meeting held November 4, 1913. Subsequently that order was resettled, directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, “ requiring said Town Board to forthwith effectuate the following resolution adopted by a majority of the electorate of the Town of Oyster Bay, at the town election held in the fall of 1913.” This resolution was as follows:

*“ Resolved,*That the sum of one hundred ($100) dollars be appropriated to pay the balance due Edward J. Meehan, of Sea Cliff, New York, for services rendered the Board of Assessors of the Town of Oyster Bay, Nassau County, New York, as clerk during the year 1910, and that this amount so appropriated be levied and collected against taxable property of the said Town in the same manner as other taxes are levied and collected or by bonding the said Town for said amount in any manner authorized or prescribed by law.”

It would appear from the answering affidavits, which for the purposes of the application herein made must be taken to be true, that in April, 1909, John Purvogel was appointed clerk to the board of assessors of the town of Oyster Bay, and served in that capacity until June 1,1910, when he tendered his resignation to said board, which was accepted by them. Purvogel’s salary was fifty dollars a month, and was paid to him by the supervisor of the town, and from the books kept by him it-would appear that he was paid in full until June 1, 1910.

About May 8, 1911, Edward J. Meehan presented a claim to the board of audit of said town for services which he claims that he rendered to the board of assessors of the town of Oyster Bay for the months of April and May, 1910, during which time John Purvogel was clerk to the board and for which period said John Purvogel had been paid. The board of audit declined to audit or pay said claim, and thereafter the said resolution was voted upon and carried at the town meeting. On May 18, 1912, Robert W. Duvall, the relator in these proceedings, was duly appointed receiver in supplementary proceedings of the property of Edward J. Meehan, and has duly filed his bond as required by the order appointing him. •

Passing without comment the indefiniteness of the order as *455finally settled, we think that, if this claim has any validity, relator is not in a position to enforce the same because he has no title thereto. Whatever moral obligation may have existed to compensate Meehan for services rendered during 1910, it is quite clear and respondent in fact concedes that no legal obligation arose in connection therewith until the adoption of the resolution at the town meeting above referred to. Relator was appointed receiver eighteen months prior thereto. By virtue of his appointment as receiver he could only become vested with such property as the judgment debtor had at the time of the commencement of the supplementary proceedings. *(Dubois*v. *Cassidy,*75 N. Y. 298; *Browning*v. *Bettis,*8 Paige, 568; *Norcross*v. *Hollingsworth,*83 Hun, 127; *Matter of Walker,*157 App. Div. 609.) At that time this claim was not the property of Meehan.

The orders appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for peremptory writ of mandamus denied, with twenty-five dollars costs.

Jenks, P. J., Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Orders appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus denied, with twenty-five dollars costs.