alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 Malta 

Field Office Bureau of Land Management 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown 

Field Office 

Miles City 

Butte Field Office 

Field 

Office Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon 

Field Office Butte Field Office 

Miles Draft RMP/EIS 

0 400 

Map 20: Boulder/Jefferson City 

Travel Plan Route Designations 

Under Alternative C 

BLM Routes 

Open Yearlong 

Bureau of Land Managment (BLM) 

Closed Yearlong Bureau of Reclamation 

Decommission 

County / City Government BLM Routes with Restrictions 

Private 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15 

State Lands 

Other Roads 

Other Federal Lands 

Public Access Route 

US Forest Service (USFS) 

Non-BLM Route 

Water 

Boulder Interstate 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land County Boundary Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual US Highway or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through Field Office / TPA Boundary 

digital means and information may be updated without notification. State Highway 

Miles Railroad 

0 4 
 Map Scale 1:50,000
 Map shows proposed road management within the Boulder/Jefferson City Travel Planning Area under 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 Alternative C. Under this alternative 3.0 miles of road would be Open yearlong, 20.5 miles of road 

would be Open with a seasonal closure from December 2 to May 15, 34.2 miles of road would be 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection Closed yearlong, and 2.7 miles of road would be Decommissioned.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Fannie Tushinsky, Appellant, against National Broadcasting Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3610

___________

Karen Taylor, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Pete Geren, Secretary, United States * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Department of the Army, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 27, 2009

Filed: December 29, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Karen Taylor appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her Title VII action alleging that she was not promoted because of unlawful

discrimination. Upon de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520

(8th Cir. 2002), we hold that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
#### F. A. R. LIQUIDATING CORPORATION v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney General of the United States of America, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Appellant.

No. 11076.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted June 8, 1955.

Decided June 15, 1955.

Irwin A. Seibel, Washington, D. C. (Dallas S. Townsend, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard G. Hagner, U. S. Atty. for Dist. of Delaware, Wilmington, Del., James D. Hill, George B. Searls, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

E. Ennalls Berl, Wilmington, Del. (Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, Del., Ernest S. Meyers, Lawrence R. Eno, Laporte & Meyers, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this ease, which was decided by this court on January 13, 1954, 209 F.2d 375, the defendant has filed a motion to recall and clarify the mandate of this court which reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the cause with instructions to proceed in accordance with the opinion of this court. The district court in an opinion, 130 F.Supp. 691, filed April 18, 1955 rightly concluded that the issue, and the only one remaining in the case, to be tried on remand was whether the cable of acceptance of Fernseh, G.m.b.H., was sent prior to 1:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) in Washington, D. C., June 14, 1941, and hence prior to the effective time of Executive Order 8785. Under the mandate the defendant may not now assert, as he seeks for the first time to do, that the time of the completion of the contract is to be determined by the application of German law to be the time of the receipt of the cable of acceptance by the plaintiff instead of the time of its sending.

The motion will be denied.
The DJI User Manuals were too large to download over the docket portal. DJI is the prominent 

manufacturer of UAS with their lineup of the Inspire 1, Phantom 3, and Matrice 100 UAS systems.

Manuals for all these products can be found here... http://www.dji.com/support
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,002

 1,791

 1,774

 2,353

 4,491

 3,862

 1,796

 1,395

 742

 491

 379

 303

 229

 199

 185

 343

 478

 471

 381

 321

 299

 290

 236

 209

 190

 174

 182

 196

 207

 220

 230

 288

 324

 368

 407

 450

 416

 403

 324

 303

 289

 268

 219

 184

 170

 170

 174

 196

 257

 250

 201

 174

 172

 188

 184

 167

 166

 171

 179

 195

 205

 216

 381

 544

 626

 808

 1,559

 1,481

 662

 565

 446

 331

 306

 247

 199

 181

 179

 203

 240

 308

 294

 258

 224

 202

 199

 190

 177

 169

 177

 188

 201

 212

 222

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 12,618

 11,514

 10,976

 10,474

 10,660

 10,810

 9,914

 9,351

 9,047

 8,937

 8,877

 8,722

 8,505

 8,336

 8,134

 7,793

 7,407

 6,907

 5,642

 4,419

 3,981

 3,618

 3,371

 3,230

 3,101

 3,023

 3,001

 3,008

 3,030

 3,039

 3,021

 901

 822

 784

 748

 761

 772

 708

 668

 646

 638

 634

 623

 608

 595

 581

 557

 529

 493

 403

 316

 284

 258

 241

 231

 222

 216

 214

 215

 216

 217

 216

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.41

 1,198.78

 1,199.05

 1,199.09

 1,198.84

 1,198.68

 1,198.60

 1,198.55

 1,198.55

 1,198.56

 1,198.54

 1,198.51

 1,199.10

 1,201.01

 1,199.58

 1,199.06

 1,198.85

 1,198.74

 1,198.67

 1,198.62

 1,198.59

 1,198.55

 1,198.54

 1,198.52

 1,198.51

 1,199.68

 1,201.02

 1,199.49

 48.62

 49.27

 49.75

 49.83

 49.38

 49.09

 48.95

 48.86

 48.86

 48.88

 48.85

 48.79

 49.84

 53.33

 50.71

 49.77

 49.40

 49.20

 49.08

 48.99

 48.94

 48.86

 48.85

 48.81

 48.79

 50.89

 53.35

 50.55

STORAGE

-0.02

+0.66

+0.48

+0.07

-0.45

-0.29

-0.14

-0.09

+0.00

+0.02

-0.04

-0.05

+1.05

+3.49

-2.63

-0.94

-0.38

-0.20

-0.12

-0.09

-0.05

-0.07

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

+2.10

+2.46

-2.81

CHANGE

129

863

1,144

999

383

267

245

218

262

286

236

196

1,505

7,923

565

445

434

383

337

296

280

231

246

215

216

3,168

7,447

281

INFLOW

 130

 528

 897

 957

 604

 407

 314

 260

 260

 271

 250

 220

 973

 6,163

 1,882

 912

 617

 479

 395

 337

 303

 260

 250

 230

 220

 2,107

 6,201

 1,690

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 7

 3

 3

 5

 3

 3

 2

 1

 1

 5

 3

 2

 1

 0

 5

 4

 5

 2

 4

 3

 3

 6

 4

 2

 4

 3

 4

 5

C.F.S.

 .12

 .06

 .05

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .08

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .04

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .11

 .07

 .04

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 1.38

 .59

 .42

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .04

 .00

 .00

 1.44

 3.24

 .15

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.07

 1.45

 .02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/06/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.88 29,200 28 28,117 93 1.65 10.13

ACRE-FEET +1,880 57,918 56 55,770 184

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 55,770

OUTLET

TOTAL

 56

 55,826

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.13

JULY 1, 2018 20.31

 48.63

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 20.31
No. 31,390.

#### The State, ex rel. Frederick R. White, County Attorney of Wyandotte County, *Plaintiff,*v. E. F. Landor et al., etc., *Defendants.*

(21 P. 2d 933.)

Opinion filed May 13, 1933.

*Frederick R. White,*county attorney, *Earl B. Swamer*and *W. R. Baker,*both of Kansas City, for the plaintiff.

*Lee Judy,*of Kansas City, for the defendants.

*Per Cv/riam:*

1. The requisite figures of the latest school census ought to be available from the reports of the school district clerk or in the files of the county superintendent of public instruction; and where these are wanting, the district school board has authority to make such a census to determine the number of pupils on which the computation may be made pursuant to the last proviso in section 12 of house bill No. 666.

2. Where the levy of 6 mills will not raise sufficient money to run the school the proviso of section 12 may be invoked if it will raise a larger sum; but in no event can the 6-mill levy be augmented by using the power granted by the proviso as an addition to such 6-mill levy.

3. If either the 6-mill levy or a levy under the proviso of section 12 will not raise sufficient money to run the school, the amount may be increased by 25 per cent under the provisions of section 20.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 823

 812

 722

 735

 779

 723

 638

 680

 690

 693

 778

 842

 814

 801

 726

 858

 672

 736

 725

 694

 624

 630

 625

 611

 590

 562

 648

 659

 712

 798

 774

 405

 366

 359

 351

 366

 342

 336

 360

 354

 402

 417

 442

 425

 402

 425

 389

 432

 396

 370

 386

 401

 422

 401

 375

 367

 368

 385

 385

 379

 395

 351

 547

 498

 467

 468

 482

 439

 436

 459

 487

 517

 548

 602

 603

 555

 523

 539

 517

 560

 527

 492

 476

 494

 486

 461

 453

 462

 490

 526

 517

 593

 487

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 354

 324

 305

 305

 314

 287

 285

 300

 317

 336

 355

 388

 389

 359

 339

 349

 336

 362

 342

 320

 310

 321

 316

 301

 296

 302

 319

 341

 336

 382

 317

TOTAL 15,711

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

January-05

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 2 7,132 4,378 11,509 14,146 8,683 22,82

2-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 7,403 3,958 11,361 14,683 7,851 22,53

3-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 6,986 3,824 10,809 13,856 7,584 21,44

4-Jan-05 0 12 12 1 0 0 0 2 8,187 3,806 11,993 16,239 7,549 23,78

5-Jan-05 0 12 12 2 0 0 0 2 7,981 3,701 11,682 15,830 7,341 23,17

6-Jan-05 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 3 8,369 3,888 12,257 16,599 7,712 24,31

7-Jan-05 0 0 0 2 72 0 72 8 6,646 4,225 10,871 13,183 8,380 21,56

8-Jan-05 0 0 0 2 51 0 51 12 8,179 4,247 12,426 16,224 8,423 24,64

9-Jan-05 0 12 12 3 48 0 48 15 6,416 4,210 10,626 12,726 8,350 21,07

10-Jan-05 0 0 0 3 12 0 12 16 8,247 4,223 12,469 16,357 8,376 24,73

11-Jan-05 0 24 24 4 18 84 102 23 8,592 4,250 12,842 17,043 8,430 25,4712-Jan-05 75 72 147 15 42 96 138 33 7,390 4,237 11,628 14,659 8,405 23,0613-Jan-05 87 24 111 23 99 144 243 50 8,402 4,211 12,613 16,665 8,353 25,0114-Jan-05 33 0 33 25 102 168 270 69 8,338 4,196 12,534 16,539 8,323 24,86

15-Jan-05 48 0 48 29 138 60 198 82 8,446 4,186 12,632 16,753 8,303 25,05

16-Jan-05 36 0 36 31 78 36 114 90 8,423 4,171 12,595 16,708 8,274 24,9817-Jan-05 24 12 36 34 144 72 216 105 7,624 4,238 11,862 15,123 8,406 23,52

18-Jan-05 66 0 66 38 90 24 114 113 8,275 4,229 12,505 16,414 8,389 24,8019-Jan-05 36 12 48 40 45 0 45 116 8,129 4,294 12,423 16,123 8,518 24,6420-Jan-05 45 12 57 44 39 24 63 120 8,148 4,328 12,476 16,161 8,585 24,7421-Jan-05 81 0 81 50 72 12 84 121 7,879 4,363 12,242 15,628 8,654 24,2822-Jan-05 48 0 48 53 120 24 144 128 7,872 4,395 12,268 15,615 8,718 24,33

23-Jan-05 30 12 42 56 48 0 48 128 7,599 4,379 11,977 15,072 8,685 23,7524-Jan-05 78 12 90 62 15 0 15 128 7,659 4,339 11,998 15,192 8,606 23,7925-Jan-05 66 24 90 67 28 12 40 124 7,492 4,376 11,867 14,860 8,679 23,5326-Jan-05 66 36 102 63 0 36 36 116 7,524 4,385 11,908 14,923 8,697 23,62

27-Jan-05 57 96 153 66 21 0 21 101 7,409 4,377 11,786 14,696 8,681 23,3728-Jan-05 63 60 123 73 21 12 33 84 7,522 4,234 11,756 14,920 8,398 23,31

29-Jan-05 60 36 96 76 21 12 33 72 7,628 4,361 11,990 15,131 8,651 23,7830-Jan-05 72 48 120 82 21 12 33 66 7,641 4,358 11,998 15,155 8,644 23,7931-Jan-05 36 24 60 84 48 0 48 54 7,739 4,358 12,098 15,351 8,645 23,99

Total 1,107 540 1,647 XXXX 1,423 828 2,251 XXXX 241,278 130,725 372,003 478,574 259,293 737,86

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for January = 1,900

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combine
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 127

 129

 134

 128

 128

 130

 133

 134

 135

 142

 155

 164

 171

 185

 191

 197

 250

 271

 320

 558

 903

 1,210

 1,275

 1,486

 1,076

 848

 641

 592

 563

 378

 676

 117

 117

 117

 115

 115

 113

 112

 110

 113

 112

 115

 117

 120

 121

 122

 124

 125

 126

 126

 129

 134

 147

 162

 179

 161

 154

 155

 148

 145

 142

 140

 121

 120

 120

 120

 119

 119

 120

 120

 122

 124

 129

 133

 135

 135

 134

 135

 140

 145

 155

 194

 240

 299

 340

 425

 367

 306

 267

 238

 197

 177

 188

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,778

 1,777

 1,775

 1,773

 1,769

 1,763

 1,753

 1,732

 1,716

 1,706

 1,705

 1,712

 1,723

 1,737

 1,750

 1,765

 1,785

 1,810

 1,846

 1,921

 2,041

 2,220

 2,438

 2,739

 2,977

 3,150

 3,282

 3,385

 3,448

 3,490

 3,538

 127

 127

 127

 127

 126

 126

 125

 124

 123

 122

 122

 122

 123

 124

 125

 126

 128

 129

 132

 137

 146

 159

 174

 196

 213

 225

 234

 242

 246

 249

 253

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 644.5 How long is a project period?

A project period under the Educational Opportunity Centers program is five years.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11)

[75 FR 65780, Oct. 26, 2010]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.27 Change in ownership, management, or control of the applicant.

In the event of any change in the ownership, management, or control of the applicant (in case of a corporation, any change in the officers, directors, or persons holding more than 10 percent of the corporate stock), after the date of filing of any application for a basic permit and prior to final action on such application, the applicant shall notify the appropriate TTB officer immediately of such change.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 162

 161

 160

 165

 169

 174

 172

 174

 174

 176

 185

 189

 186

 189

 194

 194

 198

 201

 198

 193

 194

 196

 195

 195

 196

 193

 195

 195

 202

 211

 206

 136

 141

 143

 147

 152

 155

 158

 160

 163

 170

 173

 177

 178

 162

 184

 188

 190

 192

 181

 187

 188

 163

 184

 182

 190

 186

 179

 182

 183

 195

 194

 149

 149

 150

 155

 158

 163

 166

 167

 169

 173

 178

 182

 182

 182

 188

 191

 194

 196

 190

 190

 192

 191

 193

 189

 193

 190

 191

 192

 193

 199

 199

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,138

 2,105

 2,050

 2,018

 2,027

 2,051

 2,086

 2,116

 2,145

 2,181

 2,219

 2,256

 2,290

 2,323

 2,362

 2,404

 2,448

 2,489

 2,521

 2,548

 2,574

 2,598

 2,622

 2,638

 2,653

 2,661

 2,670

 2,680

 2,685

 2,693

 2,698

 153

 150

 146

 144

 145

 147

 149

 151

 153

 156

 159

 161

 164

 166

 169

 172

 175

 178

 180

 182

 184

 186

 187

 188

 190

 190

 191

 191

 192

 192

 193

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00343-CR

Alex CRANK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007CR10969

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 11, 2012

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On June 4, 2012, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the trial court clerk, stating his 

intent to appeal “from the denial of his request for a free appellate record in his cause.” Based on 

the documentation attached to appellant’s notice of appeal, it appears that appellant is seeking a 

copy of the record to pursue a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.

On June 18, 2012, the trial court certified to this court that no ruling was made on the 

document filed in the trial court; therefore, no order was ever entered denying appellant’s 
04-12-00343-CR

- 2 -

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (permitting appeal of an appealable order). Moreover, this 

court has no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases; instead, 

jurisdiction is reserved to the district courts and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07; Rodriguez v. State, No. 03-04-00076-CR, 2004 WL 635292, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 1, 2004, no pet.) (not designated for publication). 

By order dated June 18, 2012, appellant was ordered to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On July 2, 2012, appellant filed a written 

response referencing a prior appeal number 04-09-00157-CR, which was transferred from this 

court to the Eighth Court of Appeals and assigned appeal number 08-09-00109-CR. This court 

has no jurisdiction to consider any issues pertaining to the prior appeal because jurisdiction was 

transferred to the Eighth Court of Appeals. Moreover, appellant’s response to our June 18, 2012 

order provides no basis for this court to exercise jurisdiction over the pending appeal given that 

the trial court has not signed an appealable order to which the June 4, 2012 notice of appeal 

relates. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: Christina Ann Trevino XXX-XX-7758 Case No. 18-32464

DIRECTIVE FOR TERMINATION OF WAGE DEDUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

DFAS-IN JFV -PAYROLL DEPT

8899 E 56TH STREET

INDIANAPOLIS IN 46249

The above case having been completed, dismissed, or converted to a Chapter 7, or the debtor

no longer being an employee of your company and no further payments being required in this matter;

IT IS DIRECTED:

That the above Employer be, and is hereby directed to discontinue withholding any additional

funds from the wages of the debtor, Christina Ann Trevino, and to remit directly to the debtor any

funds held or to be held as of the date of this Directive under the previous Directive for Deduction.

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO A STANDING ORDER OF THE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: July 14, 2021

/S/Suzanne E. Wade

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

IF ANY INFORMATION IS DESIRED REGARDING THIS DIRECTIVE, CALL THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AT

804.775.0979 OR FAX TO 804.775.0986

The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the debtor, debtor's counsel and the

employer on the date above written.

/S/Suzanne E. Wade

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee

Case 18-32464-KLP Doc 18 Filed 07/14/21 Entered 07/14/21 15:19:20 Desc

Page 1 of 1
§ 97.109 IRB review of research. ( a ) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research activities covered by this policy, including exempt research activities under § 97.104 for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption (under § 97.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7), and (8)).
( b ) An IRB shall require that information given to subjects (or legally authorized representatives, when appropriate) as part of informed consent is in accordance with § 97.116. The IRB may require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in § 97.116, be given to the subjects when in the IRB's judgment the information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects.
( c ) An IRB shall require documentation of informed consent or may waive documentation in accordance with § 97.117.
( d ) An IRB shall notify investigators and the institution in writing of its decision to approve or disapprove the proposed research activity, or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research activity. If the IRB decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall include in its written notification a statement of the reasons for its decision and give the investigator an opportunity to respond in person or in writing.
( e ) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research requiring review by the convened IRB at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, not less than once per year, except as described in § 97.109(f).
( f ) ( 1 ) Unless an IRB determines otherwise, continuing review of research is not required in the following circumstances: ( i ) Research eligible for expedited review in accordance with § 97.110;
( ii ) Research reviewed by the IRB in accordance with the limited IRB review described in § 97.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), or (d)(7) or (8);
( iii ) Research that has progressed to the point that it involves only one or both of the following, which are part of the IRB-approved study: ( A ) Data analysis, including analysis of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, or
( B ) Accessing follow-up clinical data from procedures that subjects would undergo as part of clinical care.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( g ) An IRB shall have authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process and the research.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)