alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

February-10

Colored background verified with DFG's report Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily T

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre 

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Feb-10 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 17 0 0 3,731 3,313 7,044 7,401 6

2-Feb-10 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 17 0 0 3,883 3,432 7,315 7,702 6

3-Feb-10 0 4 4 0 5 3 8 17 0 0 3,980 3,505 7,486 7,895 6

4-Feb-10 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 17 0 0 4,157 3,484 7,641 8,245 6

5-Feb-10 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 18 0 0 3,042 3,449 6,491 6,033 6

6-Feb-10 0 8 8 1 6 0 6 18 0 0 2,905 3,993 6,898 5,763 7

7-Feb-10 0 0 0 1 8 0 8 17 0 0 2,970 4,109 7,079 5,891 8

8-Feb-10 0 8 8 1 10 0 10 15 0 0 2,530 4,125 6,655 5,019 8

9-Feb-10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 3,159 4,209 7,368 6,266 8

10-Feb-10 0 4 4 2 1 8 9 11 0 0 3,436 4,164 7,600 6,815 8

11-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 10 0 0 2,800 3,690 6,490 5,553 7

12-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 2 11 13 10 0 0 2,466 3,470 5,936 4,892 6

13-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 9 0 0 2,594 3,467 6,062 5,146 6

14-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 2,539 3,463 6,003 5,037 6

15-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 4 12 16 7 0 0 2,461 3,460 5,921 4,882 616-Feb-10 0 4 4 2 4 0 4 7 0 0 2,448 3,462 5,910 4,855 6

17-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 2 8 10 7 0 0 2,660 3,467 6,127 5,276 618-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 0 8 8 8 0 0 2,208 4,021 6,229 4,380 7

19-Feb-10 0 8 8 2 0 12 12 8 0 0 3,415 4,212 7,626 6,773 820-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 0 8 8 8 0 0 3,194 4,202 7,396 6,335 8

21-Feb-10 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 8 0 0 2,974 4,212 7,185 5,898 8

22-Feb-10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 3,429 3,808 7,237 6,802 7

23-Feb-10 0 N 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 3,021 3,703 6,724 5,993 7

24-Feb-10 0 0 N 0 1 54 3 57 11 0 0 N 2,958 3,667 6,625 5,867 7

25-Feb-10 0 0 0 1 12 4 16 12 0 0 2,956 3,709 6,665 5,863 7

26-Feb-10 0 4 N 4 1 2 0 2 11 0 0 N 2,967 3,714 6,681 5,885 7

27-Feb-10 0 4 N 4 1 10 0 10 11 0 0 N 2,774 3,768 6,542 5,503 728-Feb-10 0 0 N 0 1 8 16 24 13 0 0 N 2,967 3,691 6,658 5,886 7

Total 0 44 44 XXXX 153 124 277 XXXX 0 0 84,626 104,969 189,595 167,856 208

Official numbers are posted on DFG's websiteNote: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Trac
### §§1356m, 1356n. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title XIV, §1401(a), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3294

Section 1356m, Pub. L. 96–599, §4, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3492, related to delegation of Presidential powers and duties, protection of interests of United States consumers, and remedial action with respect to the International Coffee Agreement Act of 1980.

Section 1356n, Pub. L. 96–599, §5, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3492; Pub. L. 98–120, §1(1), Oct. 12, 1983, 97 Stat. 809, related to annual report by the President to Congress on the International Coffee Agreement, 1983.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel, NIMHD Conference Grant Application (R13) Review.                    

*Date:*                         April 7, 2011,                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard,  Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-9536,                         *mlaudesharp@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: March 29, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-7919 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gravitas International, Inc. a
Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Edward Shapero, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Gravitas International, Inc., and will be retained by Gravitas
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Edward Shapero
--------------------------
Edward Shapero
Chief Financial Officer
Aug 19th 2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.8

VITALSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.AMENDMENT TOSTOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

 

RECITALS

 

      A.   VitalStream Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") previously issued to Brookstreet Securities Corporation ("Brookstreet") a Stock Purchase Warrant ("Warrant") on April 23, 2002 with respect to 212,500 shares of common stock of the Company ("Common Stock");
      B.   The Warrant had an exercise period that was to expire on October 23, 2003; however, pursuant to the Finder's Fee Agreement, dated January 17, 2003, between Brookstreet and the Company, if the Company consummated a certain type of financing prior to January 17, 2004, Brookstreet would have the option to have the Company exchange the Warrant for an identical warrant with an expiration date of April 23, 2005;
      C.   The Company did consummate a type of financing that gave Brookstreet the right to request an Exchange of the Warrant to effectuate an extension of the expiration date of the Warrant, and Brookstreet timely requested from the Company such an exchange; and
      D.   Brookstreet and the Company have mutually agreed that in lieu of the issuance of a new warrant to Brookstreet in exchange for the Warrant solely to extend the expiration date, the company would amend the Warrant to achieve the same purpose.
 
**AMENDMENT

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of BrookStreet having introduced the Company to a contact with whom the Company consummated a financing transaction, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company amends the Warrant as follows:

      1.   Exercise Period.  Brookstreet may exercise the purchase rights represented by the Warrant at any time up to and including April 23, 2005, subject to all other terms and conditions of the Warrant and any other applicable agreement(s) between Brookstreet and the Company.

      2.   Effect of Amendment.  Except as otherwise modified by this Amendment, the Company ratifies and confirms all other terms and conditions of the Warrant, which shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed and deliveed this Amendment to Stock Purchase Warrant as of October 23, 2003.

 

**VITALSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.  
By: 
Name:
Paul Summers
Title:
President & CEO  

 

 

 ****
#### § 682.606 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 278

 289

 303

 295

 265

 237

 236

 237

 237

 236

 237

 234

 236

 229

 229

 225

 220

 241

 256

 241

 238

 234

 243

 245

 227

 231

 243

 210

 216

 221

 230

 235

 246

 240

 232

 238

 205

 212

 200

 211

 211

 206

 212

 213

 210

 212

 209

 209

 215

 242

 220

 227

 221

 225

 222

 210

 218

 202

 198

 197

 198

 213

 258

 265

 275

 264

 248

 226

 227

 226

 226

 225

 223

 225

 228

 222

 221

 219

 215

 227

 245

 231

 233

 229

 235

 233

 220

 226

 220

 205

 207

 213

 225

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 175

 180

 186

 179

 169

 156

 156

 156

 156

 155

 154

 155

 157

 153

 153

 151

 149

 156

 167

 159

 160

 158

 161

 160

 152

 156

 152

 143

 144

 148

 155

TOTAL 7,142

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
(No. 74-CC-429

#### Richard Simmons, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Richard Simmons, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31


                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Lionel Simons, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Migami, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) (language omitted pursuant to SEC Release
34-47986) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) (Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986);

                  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 12, 2006



/s/ Lionel Simons
-----------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
§ 690.14 Applicant's request to recalculate expected family contribution because of a clerical or arithmetic error or the submission of inaccurate information. ( a ) An applicant may request that the Secretary recalculate his or her expected family contribution if— ( 1 ) He or she believes a clerical or arithmetic error has occurred; or
( 2 ) The information he or she submitted was inaccurate when the application was signed.
( b ) The applicant shall request that the Secretary make the recalculation described in paragraph (a) of this section by— ( 1 ) Having his or her institution transmit that request to the Secretary under EDE; or
( 2 ) Sending to the Secretary an approved form, certified by the student, and one of the student's parents if the student is a dependent student.
( c ) If an institution transmits electronically the student's recalculation request to the Secretary, the corrected information must be supported by— ( 1 ) Information contained on an approved form, that is certified by the student, and if the student is a dependent student, one of the student's parents; or
( 2 ) Verification documentation provided by a student under subpart E of part 668 of this chapter.
( d ) The recalculation request must be received by the Secretary no later than the deadline date established by the Secretary through publication in the Federal Register.
[50 FR 10721, Mar. 15, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 8954, Mar. 14, 1986; 59 FR 54732, Nov. 1, 1994; 61 FR 60397, Nov. 27, 1996; 86 FR 59626, Oct. 28, 2021]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,922

 4,448

 4,552

 4,961

 5,105

 5,684

 6,352

 5,928

 6,044

 5,020

 4,659

 5,258

 4,696

 5,219

 4,956

 5,732

 6,773

 7,562

 8,116

 8,075

 8,695

 7,404

 7,504

 6,275

 7,517

 4,871

 5,929

 5,830

 6,098

 6,780

 6,540

 649

 618

 597

 611

 568

 531

 669

 844

 696

 467

 553

 461

 579

 539

 623

 763

 676

 959

 1,048

 1,100

 1,153

 1,131

 1,202

 931

 1,385

 797

 992

 1,267

 1,624

 1,206

 1,194

 1,852

 2,004

 2,245

 2,440

 2,370

 2,656

 2,878

 3,010

 2,674

 2,635

 2,051

 2,087

 2,426

 2,381

 2,431

 2,727

 3,143

 3,589

 4,060

 4,326

 4,667

 4,702

 4,871

 4,046

 3,929

 2,427

 3,442

 3,498

 3,536

 3,654

 3,649

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 25,224

 25,627

 26,309

 27,074

 27,583

 28,326

 29,364

 30,463

 31,287

 32,333

 32,751

 32,985

 33,314

 33,709

 34,288

 35,011

 35,909

 37,058

 38,748

 40,418

 42,207

 43,899

 46,096

 47,507

 49,385

 49,725

 50,741

 51,858

 52,963

 53,890

 54,396

 1,802

 1,831

 1,879

 1,934

 1,970

 2,023

 2,097

 2,176

 2,235

 2,310

 2,339

 2,356

 2,380

 2,408

 2,449

 2,501

 2,565

 2,647

 2,768

 2,887

 3,015

 3,136

 3,293

 3,393

 3,528

 3,552

 3,624

 3,704

 3,783

 3,849

 3,885

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 8.2 What definitions apply? The following definitions apply to this part: *Adjudicative authority* includes, but is not limited to— ( 1 ) A court of law or other judicial forums; and
( 2 ) Mediation, arbitration, or other forums for dispute resolution.
*Demand* includes a subpoena, subpoena duces tecum, request, order, or other notice for testimony or records arising in a legal proceeding.
*Department* means the U.S. Department of Education.
*Employee* means a current or former employee or official of the Department or of an advisory committee of the Department, including a special government employee, unless specifically provided otherwise in this part.
*Legal proceeding* means— ( 1 ) A proceeding before an adjudicative authority;
( 2 ) A legislative proceeding, except for a proceeding before either House of Congress or before any committee or subcommittee of Congress, to the extent of matter within the committee's or subcommittee's jurisdiction; or
( 3 ) An administrative proceeding.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Education or an official or employee of the Department acting for the Secretary under a delegation of authority.
*Testimony* means statements made in connection with a legal proceeding, including but not limited to statements in court or other forums, depositions, declarations, affidavits, or responses to interrogatories.
*United States* means the Federal Government of the United States and any of its agencies or instrumentalities.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 20 U.S.C. 3474)
[57 FR 34646, Aug. 5, 1992, as amended at 73 FR 27748, May 14, 2008]
#### CASS, Respondent, v. THE PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. of California, Appellant.

(253 N. W. 626.)

(File No. 7590.

Opinion filed March 19, 1934.)

*510*Bailey & Voorhees*and *M. T. Woods,*all of Sioux Falls, for Apellant.

*Roscoe Sapterlee,*of M'itohell, for Respondent.

POLLEY, J.

This action is brought to recover on the same insurance policy that is involved in Cass v. Pac. Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, 62 S. D. 502, 253 N. W. 622, just handed do-wn, but for a different period of time. The sickness alleged to have caused the disability in this ease is the same as it was in that. The questions presented for determination in this case are the same, with one exception, as they are in that, and, so far as those questions are concerned, the result in this case is the same as in that.

The one new proposition presented by the record in this case grows out of an exhibition to< the jury made by the plaintiff of some of his diseased joints. Over defendant’s objection the trial court permitted one of plaintiff’s medical witnesses to take the plaintiff out in front of the jury and there exhibit plaintiff’s hands, wrists, feet, ankles, and knees to the jury, and show the inflamed condition of these members, and the restricted movements of the joints. Appellant contends that sucih a display is calculated to appeal to the sympathy and passion of the jury, and constitutes reversible error. But -this class of evidence, under proper restric*511tions, is usually held to be admissible, though its admission rests to some extent in the sound discretion of the trial court, and, unless there is an apparent abuse of this discretion, the ruling of the trial judge will not be disturbed on appeal Wigmore on Evidence, § 1158; Mulhado v. Brooklyn City R. Co., 30 N. Y. 370; Felsch et al v. Babb et al, 72 Neb. 736, 101 N. W. 1011; 9 Encyclopaedia of Evidence, 785; 22 C. J. 788.

 But in this 'case the privilege was abused. While the doctor was manipulating these joints, plaintiff winced as though with pain and exclaimed “ouch” and “it hurts,” etc. This course of conduct has a natural tendency to appeal to .the passion and sympathy of the jury and to lead to excessive verdicts; and in a case where the jury had the fixing of the amount of the verdict, we would not hesitate to reverse a judgment because of a demonstration like the one made in this case. We are expressing our disapproval of the course of conduct followed by plaintiff and his counsel in this case, so that a similar situation may not arise in another case. In this case the evidence, aside from that here under consideration, was such that plaintiff was clearly entitled to recover, and the amount of recovery being fixed at a specific sum by the policy, the defendant was not prejudiced.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12

                                  IDACORP, Inc.
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                           1996         1997         1998        1999         2000
<S>                                     <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes           $ 135,247   $  133,570    $ 133,806   $ 137,021    $ 210,701
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                         (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)      (3,116)
  Equity in loss of equity method               0            0          458         435          186
  investments
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                   0            0         (125)        (37)      (1,468)
  Fixed charges, as below                  70,418       69,634       69,923      72,243       73,261
     Total earnings, as defined         $ 204,252   $  199,261    $ 199,365   $ 208,825    $ 279,564

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                      $  57,348   $   60,761    $  60,677   $  62,975    $  63,339
  Preferred stock dividends of
  subsidiaries-
     gross up-IDACORP rate                 12,079        7,891        8,445       8,313        8,886
  Rental interest factor                      991          982          801         955        1,036

     Total fixed charges, as defined    $  70,418   $   69,634    $  69,923   $  72,243    $  73,261

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          2.90x        2.86x        2.85x       2.89x        3.82x

</TABLE>