alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 





	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.1




EXHIBIT A




FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL

EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT





     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the United Bankshares, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement
Agreement is made and entered into this ______day of _________, 2007, by and between UNITED
BANKSHARES, INC., a West Virginia bank holding company (the “Company”) and ____________
(the “Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into the United Bankshares, Inc. Supplemental
Executive Retirement Agreement as of ____________, 200___(the “Agreement’); and



     WHEREAS, the Company has approved an amendment to Section 3.1 of the Agreement to provide an
in-service death benefit as provided below; and,



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to enter into this Amendment to memorialize said
change to Section 3.1 of the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



     Effective November 1, 2007, Section 3.1 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated to read
and have full force and effect as follows:




	 	3.1	 	Death During Active Service. If the Executive dies while in the
active service of the Company, and is entitled to a benefit under
Article 2 of this Agreement, the Company shall pay the same benefit
payments and for the same period of time as provided in the Agreement
to the Executive’s beneficiary in the amount that the Executive was
entitled to as of the date of his death under said Article 2, except
that the benefit payments shall commence on the first day of the month
following the date of the Executive’s death.	 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed this Amendment as of the date and year first
written above.







	 	 	 	 	 
	 	UNITED BANKSHARES,
INC.


 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Its:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	[NAME OF EXECUTIVE]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 882

 802

 806

 756

 804

 889

 943

 980

 1,001

 1,009

 1,021

 1,033

 1,078

 1,096

 1,098

 1,020

 1,048

 952

 956

 951

 999

 1,004

 944

 883

 889

 980

 858

 919

 584

 602

 635

 667

 688

 699

 702

 706

 709

 715

 714

 708

 704

 696

 689

 675

 659

 635

 610

 594

 592

 586

 580

 573

 575

 574

 582

 583

 681

 674

 682

 692

 732

 779

 808

 834

 859

 845

 849

 813

 833

 849

 845

 812

 804

 750

 719

 665

 707

 702

 684

 662

 666

 689

 680

 715

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:March 8, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 437

 433

 437

 444

 468

 497

 515

 531

 547

 538

 541

 518

 531

 541

 538

 518

 513

 480

 460

 427

 453

 450

 439

 425

 428

 442

 436

 458

TOTAL 21,030

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### SUBCHAPTER III—ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGREEMENTS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital Media
Group Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I,
Jean-Francois Klein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (3) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                        /s/ Jean-Francois Klein
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Jean Francois Klein
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        September 30, 2002
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30860 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
TARZAREO JONES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 42

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tarzareo Jones has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jones h a s not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30860 Document: 00514539157 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2018No. 17

- 30860

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTE D, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-30860 Document: 00514539157 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          213082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                213082
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  385477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                         26937
<OTHER-SE>                                      358536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    385477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22164
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              22164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     22164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1771

CHARLEATTA M. BLACK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00177

- GMG )

Submitted : September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charleatta M. Black, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1771 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Charleatta M. Black seeks to appeal the district court’s orde r denying her motion for appointment of counsel in her pending civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Black seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral a rgument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1771 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 422

 443

 434

 404

 402

 399

 396

 389

 379

 393

 428

 429

 429

 412

 392

 398

 374

 384

 389

 444

 433

 454

 472

 473

 591

 590

 618

 634

 606

 601

 566

 307

 299

 300

 336

 330

 331

 322

 313

 299

 304

 302

 304

 304

 299

 299

 305

 286

 290

 229

 223

 224

 215

 217

 225

 232

 232

 243

 244

 240

 252

 251

 338

 335

 358

 357

 354

 358

 354

 341

 321

 326

 340

 343

 345

 337

 331

 337

 315

 318

 301

 288

 292

 280

 258

 256

 304

 311

 316

 330

 332

 341

 324

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 225

 223

 237

 237

 235

 237

 235

 227

 214

 217

 226

 228

 229

 224

 221

 224

 211

 213

 202

 194

 196

 189

 175

 174

 204

 208

 211

 220

 221

 227

 216

TOTAL 10,041

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §1261. Enforcement, regulations, and scope

(a) 1 The Attorney General—

(1) shall enforce the provisions of this chapter; and

(2) has the authority to issue regulations to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 761; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §31, 63 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4004(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1812; Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1112(g), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2276.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on sections 222, 223(b), 225 and 226 of title 27, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Intoxicating Liquors (June 25, 1936, ch. 815, §§5, 10, 49 Stat. 1929, 1930).

Changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 31] corrects a typographical error in section 1261 of title 18, U.S.C.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–296, which directed amendment of subsec. (a) generally, was executed by amending text of section generally to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the amendment by Pub. L. 107–273, see below. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary of the Treasury shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. Regulations to carry out its provisions shall be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury."

Pub. L. 107–273 struck out subsec. (a) designation and subsec. (b) which read as follows: "This chapter shall not apply to the Canal Zone."

1949—Subsec. (b). Act May 24, 1949, substituted subsection designation "(b)" for "(d)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.

1 So in original. There is no subsec. (b).
### §2119. Motor vehicles

Whoever, with the intent to cause death or serious bodily harm 1 takes a motor vehicle that has been transported, shipped, or received in interstate or foreign commerce from the person or presence of another by force and violence or by intimidation, or attempts to do so, shall—

(1) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both,

(2) if serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of this title, including any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, would violate section 2241 or 2242 of this title) results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 25 years, or both, and

(3) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both, or sentenced to death.

(Added Pub. L. 102–519, title I, §101(a), Oct. 25, 1992, 106 Stat. 3384; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60003(a)(14), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970; Pub. L. 104–217, §2, Oct. 1, 1996, 110 Stat. 3020.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (2). Pub. L. 104–217 inserted ", including any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, would violate section 2241 or 2242 of this title" after "section 1365 of this title".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, §60003(a)(14), which directed the amendment of section 2119(3) of title 18 by substituting ", with the intent to cause death or serious bodily harm" for ", possessing a firearm as defined in section 921 of this title,", was executed by making the substitution in introductory provisions rather than in par. (3), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Par. (3). Pub. L. 103–322, §60003(a)(14), inserted before period at end ", or sentenced to death".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Federal Cooperation To Prevent "Carjacking" and Motor Vehicle Theft

Pub. L. 102–519, title I, §101(b), Oct. 25, 1992, 106 Stat. 3384, provided that: "In view of the increase of motor vehicle theft with its growing threat to human life and to the economic well-being of the Nation, the Attorney General, acting through the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorneys, is urged to work with State and local officials to investigate car thefts, including violations of section 2119 of title 18, United States Code, for armed carjacking, and as appropriate and consistent with prosecutorial discretion, prosecute persons who allegedly violate such law and other relevant Federal statutes."

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00379-CV

__________________

IN RE 1ST CHOICE ACCIDENT & INJURY, LLC

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

284th District Court of MontgomeryCounty, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20-09-11398-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Relator, 1st Choice Accident & Injury, 

LLC, a non-party management services organization for a non-party medical 

provider,seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial court to vacate an order denying 

a protective order in a suit resulting from a motor vehicle accident. Relator argues

information and documents relating to the business and payment relationship 

between Relator and a chiropractor who treated the Plaintiff, Angel Fermin Sanchez, 

are irrelevant to the issuesin the lawsuit and the Real Party in Interest, Satyanarayana 

Vanama, has either obtained the information from the plaintiff or could obtain the 
2

information from the chiropractor. After reviewing Relator’smandamus petition and 

the documents it provided with the petition, we conclude that Relator failed to 

establish that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition 

for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 7, 2022

Opinion Delivered December 8, 2022

BeforeGolemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
In the 

United States Court of Appeals 

For the Eleventh Circuit 

____________________ 

No. 23-13384 

____________________ 

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS 

LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR 

TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

VALERIA TAVERAS, 

a.k.a. Valeria Rosa Taveras, 

ELIEZER TAVERAS, 

a.k.a. Eliezer Taveras, Sr., 

 Defendants-Appellants, 

REUNION RESORT & CLUB OF 

ORLANDO MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. et al., 

USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Order of the Court 23-13384 

 Defendants. 

____________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida 

D.C. Docket No. 6:23-cv-01493-WWB-EJK 

____________________ 

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. 

BY THE COURT: 

This appeal is DISMISSED in part, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Eliezar Taveras and Valeria Taveras appeal, pro se, from 

a magistrate judge’s September 12, 2022, order denying them leave 

to amend their notice of removal. The magistrate judge’s order, 

however, is not final or appealable to this Court, as an appeal from 

a magistrate judge’s order must be taken to the district court. See

United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). Even 

if the district judge ultimately affirms the order, that subsequent 

affirmance would not cure the Taverases’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 

1273 (11th Cir. 1998). 

The Taverases also appeal the district court’s October 11, 

2023, order remanding the underlying action to state court. The 

order was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), and we generally lack jurisdiction 

to review such orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d). However, 

USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-13384 Order of the Court 3 

because the Taverases’s notice of removal listed 28 U.S.C. § 1443 

as a basis for removal, we have jurisdiction to review the district 

court’s remand order, including its implicit determination that removal was not warranted under § 1443. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); 

BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021); Alabama v. 

Conley, 245 F.3d 1292, 1293 n.1 (11th Cir. 2001). 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the magistrate 

judge’s September 12, 2022, order. However, this appeal may proceed as to the district court’s October 11, 2023, remand order. 

No motion for reconsideration may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 

and all other applicable rules. 

USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 3 of 3
exv10w5



 






Exhibit 10.5



Summary of Amendments made, effective July 1, 2007, to Letter Agreement with Dr. Turner.



Effective July 1, 2007, the Company increased Dr. Katherine J. Turner’s base salary to $220,000 and
amended her payout range under the Company’s variable pay program to 20% of base salary at
threshold, 40% at target and 70% at stretch.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 493

 492

 487

 480

 490

 477

 470

 483

 492

 482

 464

 485

 472

 483

 484

 565

 624

 624

 624

 657

 655

 657

 695

 669

 642

 591

 583

 574

 583

 593

 427

 428

 427

 401

 398

 390

 398

 408

 396

 396

 389

 396

 389

 399

 399

 434

 450

 421

 433

 479

 496

 452

 480

 497

 520

 464

 446

 447

 385

 438

 457

 469

 459

 443

 443

 432

 431

 446

 448

 439

 432

 443

 439

 451

 448

 495

 519

 525

 540

 557

 558

 552

 567

 560

 557

 534

 520

 502

 483

 488

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 298

 306

 300

 290

 290

 283

 282

 292

 293

 287

 283

 290

 287

 295

 293

 322

 337

 340

 350

 360

 361

 357

 366

 362

 360

 346

 337

 326

 314

 318

TOTAL 14,637

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 254

 219

 224

 239

 246

 258

 268

 272

 267

 265

 264

 265

 263

 251

 267

 247

 251

 277

 275

 287

 275

 283

 286

 275

 235

 226

 242

 236

 200

 195

 197

 206

 216

 224

 232

 241

 247

 253

 256

 256

 235

 231

 227

 229

 237

 239

 251

 260

 263

 263

 250

 217

 209

 216

 217

 220

 216

 202

 206

 215

 225

 233

 242

 247

 252

 256

 259

 260

 250

 239

 234

 235

 241

 254

 260

 269

 268

 272

 265

 243

 223

 220

 225

 226

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,566

 3,543

 3,515

 3,486

 3,468

 3,453

 3,440

 3,422

 3,396

 3,377

 3,353

 3,338

 3,316

 3,302

 3,320

 3,353

 3,388

 3,427

 3,462

 3,498

 3,524

 3,549

 3,562

 3,549

 3,513

 3,473

 3,448

 3,435

 255

 253

 251

 249

 248

 247

 246

 244

 243

 241

 240

 238

 237

 236

 237

 240

 242

 245

 247

 250

 252

 254

 254

 254

 251

 248

 246

 245

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Ida Silberman, Appellant, v. Louis Scher, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Summary of
Additional Compensation for Lead Director, and for the Audit and Compensation
Committee Chairmen


 




	
  Lead Director:

  	
   

  	
  $1,500 per quarter

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee Chairman:

  	
   

  	
  $2,000 per quarter

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation Committee Chairman:

  	
   

  	
  $500 per quarter
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-720 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TECHNOLOGY TRANFER 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDIA 

Signed at New Delhi July 20, 2009 

 with 

Side Letters 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDIA 

 Technology Transfer: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at New Delhi July 20, 2009; 

 Entered into force July 20, 2009. 

 With side letters.