alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5013 

To apply the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to small businesses to 

the same extent as such Act applies to consumers, to require the Director 

of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to define ‘‘small business’’ for purposes of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Mr. LAWSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To apply the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to small 

businesses to the same extent as such Act applies to 

consumers, to require the Director of the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection to define ‘‘small business’’ for purposes of such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Fair 

5 Debt Collection Protection Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5013 IH

1 SEC. 2. FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES FOR LOANS TO 

2 SMALL BUSINESSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Fair Debt Collection Prac4 tices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.) is amended— 

5 (1) in section 803, by amending paragraph (5) 

6 to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(5) The term ‘debt’ means any obligation or 

8 alleged obligation to pay money arising out of a 

9 transaction, whether or not such obligation has been 

10 reduced to judgment.’’; 

11 (2) by redesignating section 819 as section 820; 

12 and 

13 (3) by inserting after section 818 the following: 

14 ‘‘§ 819. Application to small businesses 

15 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—This Act shall apply to small 

16 businesses to the same extent as this Act applies to con17 sumers. 

18 ‘‘(b) SMALL BUSINESS DEFINED.—The Director of 

19 the Bureau, in consultation with the Administrator of the 

20 Small Business Administration, shall issue a rule to define 

21 the term ‘small business’ for purposes of this section.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

23 for the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is amended by 

24 striking the item relating to section 819 and inserting the 

25 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5013 IH

‘‘819. Application to small businesses. 

‘‘820. Effective date.’’. 

1 (c) PROHIBITION ON HARASSMENT OR ABUSE.—Sec2 tion 806(3) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 

3 U.S.C. 1692d) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘consumers who’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘consumers or small businesses that’’; and 

6 (2) by inserting ‘‘, to a commercial credit bu7 reau,’’ after ‘‘consumer reporting agency’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 462

 462

 488

 488

 526

 529

 504

 504

 478

 502

 486

 480

 505

 490

 496

 484

 492

 494

 494

 510

 530

 502

 487

 521

 532

 535

 560

 565

 579

 618

 599

 372

 386

 365

 435

 454

 436

 452

 435

 427

 439

 444

 440

 467

 458

 455

 465

 469

 452

 470

 480

 490

 473

 459

 455

 461

 468

 472

 475

 468

 445

 399

 428

 429

 424

 461

 494

 475

 471

 466

 447

 464

 461

 463

 486

 475

 471

 475

 484

 483

 485

 500

 502

 488

 473

 484

 493

 505

 521

 526

 522

 544

 502

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 281

 281

 278

 301

 321

 310

 307

 304

 292

 303

 301

 302

 316

 310

 307

 310

 315

 314

 316

 325

 326

 318

 308

 315

 321

 328

 338

 341

 339

 352

 326

TOTAL 14,902

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

Susan Rotkis, VSB 41693

PRICE LAW GROUP, APC

2290 E. Speedway Blvd.

Tucson, AZ 85719

T: 818.600.5533

F: 818.600.5433

susan@pricelawgroup.com

Attorneys for Debtor Brandy N. Penny

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (RICHMOND)

IN RE:

Brandy N. Penny,

Debtor.

Case No.: 20-32040-KLP

CHAPTER 7

Brandy N. Penny,

Movant,

v.

Sleep Disorder Center of Fredericksburg, 

PLC,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(O), Debtor Brandy N. Penny (“Ms. Penny”) hereby 

provides notice to the Court that her claim against Respondent Sleep Disorder Center of 

Fredericksburg has been resolved. The parties request that the Court allow 60 days for 

Case 20-32040-KLP Doc 27 Filed 12/02/21 Entered 12/02/21 18:24:03 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

the parties to document and complete their settlement. Once the settlement is fully 

completed, Ms. Penny will file a Withdrawal of the pending Motion to Reopen.

In the meantime, the parties request that the Court vacate the zoom hearing 

scheduled for December 8, 2021.

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of December, 2021.

PRICE LAW GROUP, APC

By: /s/ Susan Rotkis

Susan Rotkis, VSB 41693

2290 E. Speedway Blvd.

Tucson, AZ 85719

T: 818.600.5533

F: 818.600.5433

susan@pricelawgroup.com

Attorneys for Debtor Brandy N. Penny

Case 20-32040-KLP Doc 27 Filed 12/02/21 Entered 12/02/21 18:24:03 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 2, 2021, a true copy of the Notice of Settlement 

was mailed and e-mailed to counsel for Sleep Disorder Center of Fredericksburg, PLC; 

the previous Chapter 7 Trustee, Bruce E. Robinson: and the U.S. Trustee per the attached 

service list. 

SERVICE LIST

VIA MAIL:

Counsel for Sleep Disorder Center of Fredericksburg, PLC

Michael D. Mueller

Williams Mullen

Williams Mullen Center

200 South 10th Street, Ste. 1600

P.O. Box 1320 (23218)

Richmond, VA 23219

mmueller@williamsmullen.com

Previous Trustee

Bruce E. Robinson

P.O. Box 538

South Hill, VA 23970-0538

U.S. Trustee

John P. Fitzgerald, III

Office of the U.S. Trustee – Region 4 -R

701 E. Broad Street, Ste. 4304

Richmond, VA 23219

/s/Florence Lirato

Case 20-32040-KLP Doc 27 Filed 12/02/21 Entered 12/02/21 18:24:03 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-123932 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 31, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Feihe International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") (which report expresses an unqualified opinion with an emphasis paragraph on the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern), and the effectiveness of Company's internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of one material weakness), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Feihe International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.





Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.


Beijing, the People’s Republic of China


March 31, 2011
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 09, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A1171. KAMIKIE WILKINS v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On July 27, 2020, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a 

brief no later than August 06, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of 

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is 

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
§ 75.135 Competition exception for proposed implementation sites, implementation partners, or service providers. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70321 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) When entering into a contract with implementation sites or partners, an applicant is not required to comply with the competition requirements in 2 CFR 200.320(c) and (d), if— ( 1 ) The contract is with an entity that agrees to provide a site or sites where the applicant would conduct the project activities under the grant;
( 2 ) The implementation sites or partner entities that the applicant proposes to use are identified in the application for the grant; and
( 3 ) The implementation sites or partner entities are included in the application in order to meet a regulatory, statutory, or priority requirement related to the competition.
( b ) When entering into a contract for data collection, data analysis, evaluation services, or essential services, an applicant may select a provider using the informal, small-purchase procurement procedures in 2 CFR 200.320(b), regardless of whether that applicant would otherwise be subject to that part or whether the evaluation contract would meet the standards for a small purchase order, if— ( 1 ) The contract is with the data collection, data analysis, evaluation service, or essential service provider;
( 2 ) The data collection, data analysis, evaluation service, or essential service provider that the applicant proposes to use is identified in the application for the grant; and
( 3 ) The data collection, data analysis, evaluation service, or essential service provider is identified in the application in order to meet a statutory, regulatory, or priority requirement related to the competition.
( c ) If the grantee relied on the exceptions under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the grantee must certify in its application that any employee, officer, or agent participating in the selection, award, or administration of a contract is free of any real or apparent conflict of interest and, if the grantee relied on the exceptions of paragraph (b) of this section, that the grantee used small purchase procedures to obtain the product or service.
( d ) A grantee must obtain the Secretary's prior approval for any change to an implementation site, implementation partner, or data collection, data analysis, evaluation service, or essential service provider, if the grantee relied on the exceptions under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section to select the entity.
( e ) The exceptions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not extend to the other procurement requirements in 2 CFR part 200 regarding contracting by grantees and subgrantees.
( f ) For the purposes of this section, *essential service* means a product or service directly related to the grant that would, if not provided, have a detrimental effect on the grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[78 FR 49352, Aug. 13, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 76091, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 67264, Nov. 2, 2015]
### Equalizing Production Costs
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5291 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to require the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services to set forth a method of 

determining annual updates to premium tax credit eligibility and maximum out-of-pocket limits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2019 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, and Mr. HORSFORD) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to set forth a method of determining annual updates 

to premium tax credit eligibility and maximum out-ofpocket limits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Indexing for 

5 Health Care Affordability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5291 IH

1 SEC. 2. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PERCENTAGE. 

2 Section 1302(c)(4) of the Patient Protection and Af3 fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(c)(4)) is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘calendar year)’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar year, 

5 based on estimates and projections for the applicable cal6 endar year of the percentage (if any) by which the average 

7 per enrollee premium for eligible employer-sponsored 

8 health plans (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2) of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986) exceeds such average per 

10 enrollee premium for the preceding calendar year, as pub11 lished in the National Health Expenditure Accounts)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00380-CR

Lawrence James Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-14114

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 15, 2015
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,201

 3,198

 3,714

 3,410

 3,262

 3,051

 4,000

 2,825

 3,023

 2,458

 1,561

 1,359

 1,154

 1,113

 938

 1,206

 1,357

 1,491

 1,939

 973

 1,332

 2,373

 1,725

 1,619

 1,466

 1,525

 2,252

 4,177

 3,956

 3,912

 310

 321

 319

 420

 256

 360

 524

 288

 405

 320

 300

 290

 236

 234

 241

 249

 257

 277

 299

 295

 360

 364

 348

 329

 333

 349

 343

 360

 336

 400

 736

 679

 839

 881

 748

 950

 1,315

 897

 898

 741

 522

 532

 424

 348

 344

 368

 395

 473

 600

 514

 579

 698

 622

 571

 544

 604

 770

 1,256

 892

 1,230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 10,526

 10,850

 11,444

 11,850

 12,028

 12,000

 12,064

 11,798

 11,655

 11,552

 11,309

 11,077

 10,789

 10,510

 10,118

 9,807

 9,363

 8,955

 8,807

 8,371

 7,635

 7,436

 7,160

 6,990

 7,012

 7,084

 7,430

 8,338

 8,886

 9,748

 752

 775

 817

 846

 859

 857

 862

 843

 833

 825

 808

 791

 771

 751

 723

 701

 669

 640

 629

 598

 545

 531

 511

 499

 501

 506

 531

 596

 635

 696

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 10-720 

________________________________________________________________________ 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LITHUANIA 

Signed at Vilnius October 29, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
LITHUANIA 

Judicial Assistance: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Vilnius October 29, 2008; 

 Entered into force July 20, 2010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   779
<PP&E>                                            8049
<DEPRECIATION>                                     424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5328
<OTHER-SE>                                      (65076)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (7727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (7727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (7727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
### §507. Ship's papers

Whoever falsely makes, forges, counterfeits, or alters any instrument in imitation of or purporting to be, an abstract or official copy or certificate of the documentation of any vessel, or a certificate of ownership, pass, or clearance, granted for any vessel, under the authority of the United States, or a permit, debenture, or other official document granted by any officer of the customs by virtue of his office; or

Whoever utters, publishes, or passes, or attempts to utter, publish, or pass, as true, any such false, forged, counterfeited, or falsely altered instrument, abstract, official copy, certificate, pass, clearance, permit, debenture, or other official document herein specified, knowing the same to be false, forged, counterfeited, or falsely altered, with an intent to defraud—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 109–304, §17(d)(2), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1707.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §129 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §72, 35 Stat. 1101).

The words "passport" and "sea letter" were omitted as obsolete, in view of the Presidential proclamation of April 10, 1815, discontinuing the use of such passports and sea letters.

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes of phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–304 in first par. substituted "documentation of any vessel" for "recording, registry, or enrollment of any vessel, in the office of any collector of the customs, or a license to any vessel for carrying on the coasting trade or fisheries of the United States" and struck out "collector or other" after "granted by any" and in second par. struck out "license," after "certificate,".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

All offices of collector of customs, comptroller of customs, surveyor of customs, and appraiser of merchandise in Bureau of Customs of Department of the Treasury to which appointments were required to be made by President with advice and consent of Senate ordered abolished, with such offices to be terminated not later than Dec. 31, 1966, by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1965, eff. May 25, 1965, 30 F.R. 7035, 79 Stat. 1317, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. All functions of offices eliminated were already vested in Secretary of the Treasury by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.