alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.74 Surrender of certificates.

On the effective date of a final decision that has been issued to revoke a certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle approval, the certificate holder must surrender the original of the certificate to TTB for manual cancellation. Regardless of whether the original certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle approval has been manually canceled or not, the certificate is null and void after the effective date of the revocation. It is a violation of this section for any certificate holder to present a certificate of label approval, certificate of exemption from label approval, or distinctive liquor bottle approval to an official of the United States Government as a valid certificate after the effective date of the revocation of the certificate if the certificate holder has been previously notified that such certificate has been revoked by TTB.

[T.D. ATF-406, 64 FR 2129, Jan. 13, 1999, as amended by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19086, Apr. 13, 2001]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 495

 452

 465

 382

 346

 295

 397

 495

 609

 579

 892

 1,432

 777

 613

 606

 550

 371

 277

 258

 259

 373

 217

 244

 287

 461

 508

 412

 495

 454

 455

 311

 157

 157

 160

 157

 169

 158

 150

 147

 151

 153

 144

 168

 164

 172

 196

 190

 158

 165

 154

 151

 152

 146

 143

 139

 148

 142

 164

 173

 175

 164

 154

 247

 240

 241

 221

 222

 200

 197

 192

 198

 216

 262

 307

 318

 287

 310

 276

 233

 213

 197

 183

 177

 165

 166

 172

 216

 237

 210

 246

 234

 223

 187

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,522

 2,607

 2,698

 2,768

 2,839

 2,889

 2,935

 2,976

 3,021

 3,075

 3,153

 3,242

 3,312

 3,348

 3,411

 3,447

 3,439

 3,431

 3,406

 3,389

 3,369

 3,342

 3,310

 3,266

 3,220

 3,150

 3,042

 3,001

 2,925

 2,872

 2,826

 180

 186

 193

 198

 203

 206

 210

 213

 216

 220

 225

 232

 237

 239

 244

 246

 246

 245

 243

 242

 241

 239

 236

 233

 230

 225

 217

 214

 209

 205

 202

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 692.4 What definitions apply to the LEAP Program? The following definitions apply to the regulations in this part: ( a ) The definitions of the following terms under 34 CFR part 600: Postsecondary vocational institution (§ 600.6). Public or private nonprofit institution of higher education (§ 600.4). Secretary (§ 600.2). State (§ 600.2).
( b ) The definitions of the following terms under 34 CFR part 668: Academic year (§ 668.2). Enrolled (§ 668.2). HEA (§ 668.2). Institution (§ 668.1(b)).
( c ) The definitions of the following terms also apply to the LEAP Program:
*Full-time student* means a student carrying a full-time academic workload—other than by correspondence—as measured by both of the following: ( 1 ) Coursework or other required activities, as determined by the institution that the student attends or by the State.
( 2 ) The tuition and fees normally charged for full-time study by that institution.
*Nonprofit* has the same meaning under this part as the same term defined in 34 CFR 77.1 of EDGAR.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-1070c-4)
[52 FR 45433, Nov. 27, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 4223, Jan. 28, 1994; 65 FR 38729, June 22, 2000]
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District  

WITHDRAWAL OF CLAIM

Debtor Name and Case Number:

Creditor Name and Address:

Court Claim Number (if known):

Date Claim Filed:

Total Amount of Claim Filed:

I, the undersigned, am the above‐referenced creditor, or an authorized signatory for the above‐referenced

creditor.  I hereby withdraw the above‐referenced claim and authorize the Clerk of this Court, or their                  

duly appointed Claims Agent, to reflect this withdrawal on the official claims register for the above‐     

referenced Debtor.

Dated:__________________________     ________________________________________

        Print Name:______________________________

        Title (if applicable):________________________

DEFINITIONS

Debtor

The person, corporation, or other entity that has filed a bankruptcy case is called the debtor.

Creditor

A creditor is any person, corporation, or other entity to which the debtor owed a debt.

Proof of Claim

A form filed with the clerk of the bankruptcy court where the bankruptcy case was filed, to tell the bankruptcy court how much the debtor owed a  

creditor (the amount of the creditor’s claim).

ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED ON THIS WITHDRAWAL OF CLAIM

Court, name of Debtor and Case Number:

Fill in the name of the federal judicial district where the bankruptcy was filed (for example, Central District of California), the name of the debtor in the

bankruptcy case, and the bankruptcy case number. If you received a notice of the case from the court, all of this information is near the top of the notice.

Information about Creditor:

Complete the section giving the name and address of the creditor that was listed on the previously filed Proof of Claim form.

Information identifying the Claim that is to be withdrawn:

Complete the section giving the court claim number, date claim was filed and total amount of claim filed to help identify the claim that is to be withdrawn

Sign and print the name and title, if any, of the creditor or other person authorized to file this withdrawal of claim (attach copy of power of attorney, if

any).

This form must be filed with the clerk of the bankruptcy court where the bankruptcy case was filed or, if applicable, with

their duly appointed Claims Agent as per any procedure approved by the court in the above‐referenced bankruptcy

proceeding.

Case 20-32181-KLP Doc 607 Filed 07/10/20 Entered 07/10/20 16:31:28 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# CHAMBE RO F COMMERC E ^V^WWJ,W„„ ^ Rober t P
. Hatc h Snm aMarin , C A Pmi^enr/CE O & VISITO R & CONVENTIO N BUREA U 93454-5}} }

Augus t 18,201 0 Aloh aLey Actin g Associat e Director , X-5 0 - , _ . _' U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n " ^-^.T;:',V' I 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E W86-31 0 .-. , V^'^'L ^ Washington , D C 2059 0 '.'

_,'cjc3 0 RE : Ai r Servic e t o Denver , Colorad o ; ^ ^ Dea r Ms
. Ley , Th e Sant aMari aEconomi c Developmen t Commissio n i s adepartmen t unde r th e Sant a Mari aValle y Chambe r

o f Commerc e andi s committe dt o supportin g effort s tha t improv e th e economi c vitalit y o f

th e Sant aMari aValley
. Th e Commissio n i s i n ftill support o f th e Sant aMari aPubli c Airport Distric t addin g ne w ai r

servic e t o Denver , Colorad o throug h Skywes t Airlines
. Sant aMari ai s a

n are aprime dfor

growth an dfuture busines s expansion
. No t onl y i s it th e fastes t growin g cit y on th e Centra l Coas t o f California , i t

ha s larg e area s se t

asid e an d planne dfo r

industria l use . Local CEO' s o f existin g companie s hav e indicate dthat the y woul db e mor e likel y t o trave l fo r busines s reason s i f

adirec t rout e t o Denve r

wer e available
. Therefore , Skywes t Airline s stand s t o gai n acorporat e bas e o f passenger s no w an dint o th e future
. I

n addition , wit h Vandenber g Ai r Forc e bas e clos e by , us e o f th e airport b y th e militar y an dit s contractor s woul dincreas e substantiall y becaus e o f th e nee dt o connec t

with associate dmilitar y resource s i n Colorado
. Th e Economi c Developmen t Commissio n wil l provid e asubstantia l commitmen t i n time , mone y an dresource s l o promot e th e ne w ai r servic e t o Denve r

t o busines s an dindustry , communit y leader s an dloca l representatives
. Pleas e d o no t

hesitat e t o contac t

m e for an y additiona l infonnatio n tha i yo u may require
. Sincere h )av e Cross , Directo r Snnl aMari aEconomi c Developmen t Commissio n

Mission : T

o promot e afiivorablc economi c climat e whil e mailin g th e Sam aJVlari aXiil/ey abette r plac e t o liv e an dworft
. (805 ) 925-240 3 • (805 ) 928-755 9 (Fax ) • (800)331-377 9 • http://tuww.sautamaria.co m• ewai h smvcc@sitntamarin.coi n
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.25 Organizational documents. The supporting information required by paragraph (d) of § 18.24 includes, as applicable: ( a ) Extracts from the articles of incorporation or from the minutes of meetings of the board of directors, authorizing the incumbents of certain offices, or other persons, to sign for the corporation;
( b ) Names and addresses of the officers and directors (Do not list officers and directors who have no responsibility in connection with the operation of the concentrate plant.);
( c ) Names and addresses of the 10 persons having the largest ownership or other interest in the corporation or other entity, and the nature and amount of the stockholding or other interest of each, whether the interest appears in the name of the interested party or in the name of another for him; and
( d ) In the case of an individual owner or a partnership, the name and address of every person interested in the concentrate plant, whether the interest appears in the name of the interested party or in the name of another for him.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Frances Eliza Young, as Administratrix, etc., of Rufus L. Fiske, Deceased, Respondent, for Authority to Mortgage, Lease or Sell, etc. Isabel Fiske Clark, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 204

 202

 198

 196

 194

 197

 197

 198

 194

 178

 191

 179

 175

 180

 174

 183

 176

 165

 163

 162

 177

 190

 193

 178

 177

 189

 175

 185

 182

 164

 189

 189

 183

 173

 175

 170

 179

 168

 172

 165

 159

 163

 157

 152

 150

 147

 161

 148

 140

 144

 139

 148

 156

 152

 142

 144

 146

 142

 144

 143

 139

 142

 195

 194

 188

 186

 177

 189

 178

 188

 181

 170

 178

 169

 164

 164

 160

 171

 164

 152

 155

 150

 157

 168

 170

 161

 161

 167

 160

 165

 159

 154

 161

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 137

 136

 132

 131

 125

 133

 126

 132

 128

 121

 126

 120

 117

 117

 115

 122

 117

 110

 112

 109

 113

 120

 121

 115

 115

 119

 115

 118

 114

 111

 115

TOTAL 5,256

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Exhibit
10.2


Exhibit
A of the Employment Agreement


 





 


EMPLOYEE RELOCATION
EXPENSE AGREEMENT


EXECUTIVE RELOCATION
PROGRAM FOR CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED


 


Churchill Downs Incorporated (the “Company”) has, or will, pay or
reimburse William E. Mudd , or third party vendors for certain expenses reasonably and necessarily
incurred by you, or by the Company on your behalf, in connection with
relocating you and/or your immediate family (the “Relocation Payments”). This agreement is not an employment contract.  Nothing in this Agreement is intended to
alter your status as an at-will employee.  In consideration of the Relocation Payments, you
agree:


 


For purposes of this Agreement, Relocation Payments include any
payments or reimbursements made to you or on your behalf in connection with
relocating you and your family.  Mudd’s
relocation payments include, but are not limited to, any payments or
reimbursements associated with: 
relocation allowance; tax gross-up; moving and storing household goods;
selling your former home and purchasing a new home; home search trips; travel
to your new location; temporary housing; return trips home; school and home
search services and similar payments.


 


You are not eligible for relocation payments for expenses paid or
reimbursed by another company or source, and you agree to repay to the Company
any such relocation payments made by the Company.  In addition, you agree to notify the Company
if you or any of your household members is receiving, or is eligible to
receive, any relocation assistance from any other company or source so that the
relocation payments made to you can be coordinated with the payments from the
other company or source.  Failure to so
notify the Company may result in your forfeiture of all relocation payments not
yet made.


 


If, before the expiration of 24 months after the “effective date” of
your employment agreement you voluntarily terminate your employment you agree
to repay to the Company the relocation payments made to you or on your
behalf.  Such repayment must be made
within 30 days following your termination as follows:


 




	
  Length of Employment

  	
   

  	
  Percent or Expense to be Repaid

  	
   

  
	
  Less than one
  year

  	
   

  	
  100 

  	
  %

  
	
  One to two years

  	
   

  	
  50

  	
  %

  






 


If you do not make the repayment required under paragraphs 2 and/or 3,
and the Company resorts to litigation to obtain such repayment, you will be
liable to the Company for all of the Company’s litigation costs and expenses,
including attorneys’ fees and interest at the highest legal rate, unless the
Company does not prevail in such litigation.


 

















 


By signing below, you understand that
this Agreement is a legally enforceable contract between yourself and Churchill
Downs Incorporated.  However, nothing in
this Agreement is intended to alter your status as an at-will employee.


 


	
   

  	
  Dated:

  	
  10/1/2007

  	
   

  	
  /s/ William E. Mudd

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Employee
  Signature

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  William E. Mudd

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Printed Name
### §1007. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation transactions

Whoever, for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, knowingly makes or invites reliance on a false, forged, or counterfeit statement, document, or thing shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 750; Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §961(f), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2504(f), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4861; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330002(c), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2140.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 264(s) of title 12, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Banks and Banking (Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §12B(s), as added June 16, 1933, ch. 89, §8, 48 Stat. 177; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, §101, 49 Stat. 700).

Words "Federal Deposit Insurance" were inserted before "Corporation" in three places, so as to identify said Corporation, and phrase "under this section" was omitted as no longer applicable, considering transfer of this section to this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "transactions" for "Transactions" in section catchline.

1990—Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "30" for "20" before "years".

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 substituted "Transactions" for "transactions" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining any loan from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or any extension or renewals thereof, or the acceptance, release, or substitution of security therefor, or for the purpose of inducing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to purchase any assets, or for the purpose of obtaining the payment of any insured deposit or transferred deposit or the allowance, approval, or payment of any claim, or for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, makes any statement, knowing it to be false, or willfully overvalues any security, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,198.67

 1,199.01

 1,198.76

 1,198.67

 1,198.62

 1,198.59

 1,198.56

 1,198.54

 1,198.53

 1,198.51

 1,198.49

 1,198.49

 1,198.47

 1,198.46

 1,198.45

 1,198.44

 1,198.43

 1,198.43

 1,198.42

 1,198.41

 1,198.41

 1,198.41

 1,198.40

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.41

 1,198.39

 1,198.39

 1,198.38

 1,198.37

 1,198.37

 49.08

 49.68

 49.24

 49.08

 48.99

 48.94

 48.89

 48.85

 48.83

 48.80

 48.76

 48.76

 48.73

 48.71

 48.69

 48.67

 48.66

 48.66

 48.64

 48.62

 48.62

 48.62

 48.60

 48.59

 48.57

 48.62

 48.59

 48.59

 48.57

 48.55

 48.55

STORAGE

-0.12

+0.60

-0.44

-0.16

-0.09

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

+0.00

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.05

-0.04

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

334

1,152

286

316

297

279

245

238

237

209

194

208

175

174

162

157

150

157

141

132

139

140

124

112

112

161

103

122

110

103

106

INFLOW

 393

 847

 500

 393

 336

 302

 268

 248

 239

 219

 200

 200

 182

 173

 164

 155

 147

 147

 139

 130

 130

 130

 123

 115

 109

 130

 115

 115

 108

 100

 101

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 3

 0

 8

 2

 5

 3

 3

 7

 6

 7

 11

 7

 10

 9

 6

 10

 11

 9

 10

 10

 8

 9

 9

 5

 11

 3

 5

 6

 10

 11

 4

C.F.S.

 .05

 .00

 .14

 .04

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .12

 .11

 .13

 .20

 .12

 .17

 .15

 .11

 .18

 .19

 .15

 .17

 .17

 .14

 .15

 .15

 .09

 .19

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .18

 .19

 .07

INCHES

 .11

 1.25

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/21/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.70 6,575 31 6,658 218 3.82 1.94

ACRE-FEET -700 13,042 61 13,206 432

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 13,206

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 13,267

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.94

JULY 1, 2003 29.56

 49.21
----

(2004/C 88 E/0643)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2527/03

by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission

(29 July 2003)

Subject:   Rum

The EU has recognised the importance of the rum sector for the economic and social development of some ACP countries. Special provisions for rum are contained in the EU-US Agreement on White Spirits to back up this recognition. The terms of the Special Memorandum on rum attached to this zero for zero agreement establishes a residual tariff that provides both ACP and EU rum producers in the French DOM a small measure of continuing preference in the European market until such time as traditional suppliers might move from the production of commodity rums to value-added branded products able to compete with large and often subsidised producers in third countries.

Would the Commission, therefore, outline what measures it intends to take during the upcoming GSP review to ensure its commitments to ACP rum producers are kept? Would the Commission confirm that rum is excluded from the GSP review?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(22 August 2003)

The Joint Declaration on Rum (Declaration XXV) of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Countries (ACP) — Union Partnership Agreement recognises the importance of the rum sector for the economic and social development of several ACP countries and regions and the challenges it faces, inter alia, from the liberalisation of the European rum market.

In the aim of honouring the declaration and providing support to enable ACP rum exporters to increase competitiveness and notably to assist the ACP rum industry to move out of bulk commodity production into higher-value branded rum products, the Union has approved a EUR 70 million programme. This programme is now fully operational, the regional association of Caribbean rum producers, Wirspa, having been strengthened in order to take care of the management of the different programme activities.

Rum is not included in the general arrangements of the Union's current General system of preferences (GSP) scheme which ends on 31 December 2004 although it is included in the GSP's scheme for the least developed countries for which imports of all products except arms and ammunition are duty-free (under the so-called Everything but arms (EBA) scheme). The Commission does not foresee a change to the situation with regards to rum even after the review of the current GSP.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          500
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                500
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        5000000
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    500
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
#### Walter Beatty, Respondent, v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of *Citrone*v. *O'Rourke Engineering Construction Co.*(113 App. Div. 518; 188 N. Y. 339); *Russell*v. *Lehigh Valley R. R. Co.*(Id. 344). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.