alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4831

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, versus GEORGE R. KIBBE, II, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95- 73-MJG) Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Barry J. Pollack, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Barbara S. Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:George R. Kibbe, II, appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a twenty-four month term of imprisonment. Kibbe contends that the district court erred infailing to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the probation officer’s illegal search of his residence. We find that the admission of the evidence was not improper. See United States v. Armstrong , ___ F.3d ___, 1999 WL 498713, at *3 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We deny Kibbe’s motion for reconsideration of the orderplacing the case in abeyance as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 75.517 [Reserved]
#### § 677.4 [Reserved]
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3032617-JAN-201202:45 PM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-58148, 333-56884, 333-44686 and 333-35382) on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-36676, 333-66469, 333-39799 and 333-29007) on Form S-1 (No. 333-66471) and
on Form SB-2 (No. 333-05011) of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. of our
report dated August 1, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. as of May 31, 2002 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended May 31, 2003, which report appears in the May 31, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K, of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.

Our report dated August 1, 2003, refers to a change in the method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets in the year ended May 31, 2002, a
change in the classification for gain on extinguishment of debt recorded in the
prior year effective for the year ended May 31, 2003, and also contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

                                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 20, 2003

                                      104
#### § 10.2 Territorial extent.

This part applies to the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 684

 693

 669

 658

 677

 713

 746

 747

 770

 779

 755

 724

 756

 805

 887

 887

 864

 872

 876

 883

 908

 889

 834

 839

 835

 845

 869

 886

 0

 0

 672

 672

 651

 648

 637

 660

 659

 658

 636

 756

 720

 707

 725

 761

 806

 850

 853

 855

 858

 853

 888

 832

 824

 827

 808

 829

 838

 870

 0

 0

 680

 688

 659

 653

 656

 690

 711

 723

 684

 765

 746

 714

 739

 789

 830

 872

 858

 864

 873

 862

 902

 854

 828

 837

 827

 832

 856

 881

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 436

 441

 423

 420

 421

 442

 455

 463

 439

 489

 477

 457

 473

 504

 529

 555

 546

 550

 556

 549

 573

 544

 528

 533

 527

 530

 545

 560

 0

 0

TOTAL 21,873

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
**Exhibit31(c)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jan B. Packwood, ChiefExecutive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Idaho Power Company;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March 4, 2004 | By:    | /s/    | *     Jan B. Packwood* |
|--------|---------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |          |   |   | Jan B. Packwood                            |
|   |          |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                    |
(No. 6604

#### Xerox Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

Xerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            LAZARUS INDUSTRIES, INC.

      The undersigned, Jack M. Gertino, being the President of Lazarus
Industries, Inc., a Utah corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies the
following:

      1. The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation are hereby amended by
deleting Article I in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

                                    ARTICLE I

                                      NAME

      The name of the Corporation shall be: AMERICAN DAIRY, INC.

      2. Except as specifically provided herein, the provisions of the
Corporation's Articles of Incorporation shall remain unamended and shall
continue in full force and effect.

      3. This Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation as of March 17, 2003, and, with the
recommendation of the Board of Directors, by holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of the Corporation as of March 17,2003.

      4. The Corporation has Seven Million Four Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand
Four Hundred Seventeen (7,485,417) shares of outstanding Common Stock that were
entitled to vote on the above noted Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.
The Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was approved by holders of Four
Million Nine Hundred Thirteen Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty (4,913,830) shares,
constituting a majority of the shares of outstanding Common Stock, by written
consent dated March 17, 2003. Such consent was sufficient to approve the
amendment by the Shareholders of the company.

      These Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation shall become effective upon filing.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these Articles of
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation as of this 6th day of May, 2003.

                            LAZARUS INDUSTRIES, INC.

                            /s/ Jack M. Gertino

                            Jack M. Gertino, President
#### § 76.563 Restricted indirect cost rate—programs covered.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70338, Aug. 29, 2024.

Sections 76.564 through 76.569 apply to agencies of State and local governments that are grantees under programs with a statutory requirement prohibiting the use of Federal funds to supplant non-Federal funds, and to their subgrantees under these programs.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 6511(a))

[59 FR 59583, Nov. 17, 1994]
#### STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. KLINKEL, Appellant.

(263 N. W. 159.)

(File No. 7835.

Opinion filed November 18, 1935.)

*Charles Lacey,*of Sioux Palls, for Appellant.

*Walter Conway,*Attorney General, and *Herman L. Bode,*Assistant Attorney General, for the -State.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery made upon one John Seubert, and has appealed.

Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. After a careful examination of the record we are convinced that no error prejudicial to the rights of this appellant has been called to the attention of this court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Aristotle Corporation: Under date of March 26, 2009, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statement of earnings, stockholders equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which are included in the 2008 annual report on Form 10-K.  In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule.  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.  /s/ KPMG LLP  Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 26, 2009  SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006  DESCRIPTIONBALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIODCHARGED TO COSTS AND EXPENSESCHARGED TO OTHER ACCOUNTSDEDUCTIONSBALANCE AT END OF PERIODAllowance for doubtfulReceivablesYear ended
December 31,2006$514,000$99,000$-$(99,000)(a)$514,0002006$514,000$199,000$-$(298,000)(a)$415,0002007$415,000$275,000$-$(157,000)(a)$533,000  (a) Includes write-offs of trade accounts receivable, net of recoveries of amounts previously written-off.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Reink Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Smith,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ William Smith
Chief Financial Officer

September 22, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 607.30 What are allowable costs and what are the limitations on allowable costs? ( a ) *Allowable costs.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a grantee may expend grant funds for activities that are related to carrying out the allowable activities included in its approved application.
( b ) *Supplement and not supplant.* Grant funds shall be used so that they supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under the grant and in no case supplant those funds.
( c ) *Limitations on allowable costs.* A grantee may not use an indirect cost rate to determine allowable costs under its grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057-1059 and 1066)
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 11
Case 17-31626-KRH Doc 1 Filed 03/29/17 Entered 03/29/17 09:38:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 11
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ulticom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Shawn K. Osborne,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark A. Kissman,
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                              /s/ Shawn K. Osborne
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Shawn K. Osborne
                                             President and CEO
                                             Principal Executive Officer
                                             June 9, 2004


                                              /s/ Mark A. Kissman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Mark A. Kissman
                                             Vice President of Finance and CFO
                                             Principal Financial Officer
                                             June 9, 2004




This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 84.620 Cooperative agreement.

*Cooperative agreement* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition of grant in § 84.650), except that substantial involvement is expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award. The term does not include cooperative research and development agreements as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF FIRST INDIANA CORPORATION

First Indiana Corporation has the following wholly owned subsidiaries, which are organized under the laws of the United States:



|                                         |  |                                           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|First Indiana Bank, National Association |  | United States of America                  
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Financial Services, L.L.C. |  | Indiana                                   
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Capital Trust I            |  | Delaware                                  
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Capital Statutory Trust II |  | Connecticut                               
|                                         | 
|First Indiana Capital Corporation        |  | Indiana                                   

First Indiana Bank has the following direct and indirect subsidiaries:



|                                      |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation
|First Indiana Investor Services, Inc. |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|One Mortgage Corporation              |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|One Investment Company, L.L.C.        |  | Delaware                                  
|                                      | 
|One Investment Partners, L.L.C.       |  | Delaware                                  
|                                      | 
|Pioneer Service Corporation           |  | Indiana                                   
|                                      | 
|MB Realty Company                     |  | Indiana
### Bedrock geology of the Crompton quadrangle, Rhode Island

By: Alonzo W. Quinn

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1158B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johanna Lee, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 303.35 State.

Except as provided in § 303.732(d)(3) (regarding State allotments under this part), *State* means each of the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and the four outlying areas and jurisdictions of Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(31))