THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR

1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

1.FOkTF1Ep02.

RESOiJ

U.S. Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation
ERRATA

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 1995 Sedimentation Survey

Page 10, Table 1, item 9: This should read 2,100 feet rather than 2214.

Page 12, Table 1, item 47,footnote 1: Modifications to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised

the dam elevation and lowered the spillway sill elevation. The original dam elevation was 2142 and

the spiliway elevation (top of radial gates) was 2136.

Page 13. Table 2, ,foolnole 7: Computed sediment expressed as a percentage of total computed

sediment (182,185 acre-feet).
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE J

FormApproved

0MB No. 0704-0188

Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and

maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the cotlection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,

including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA

22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paper-work Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503.

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

May 1996 Final

4. TITLE AND SUBTiTLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir

1995 Sedimentation Survey PR

6. AUTHOR(S)

Joe Lyons and Lori Lest

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

Bureau of Reclamation REPORT NUMBER

Technical Service Center

Denver CO 80225

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

Bureau of Reclamation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

Denver Federal Center

P0 Box 25007 DIBR

Denver CO 80225-0007

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Hard copy available at the Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado

12a. DISTRIBUTiON/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

Available from the National Technical Information Service,

Operations Division, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) surveyed the area of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir in the spring of

1995 to compile field data for developing a reservoir topographic map and computing a present storage-elevation

relationship. The data were also used to calculate the volume of reservoir capacity loss attributable to sediment

accumulation since dam closure in 1909. The bathymetric survey used sonic depth recording equipment

interfaced with a GPS (Global Positioning System) that gave continuous sounding positions throughout Theodore

Roosevelt Reservoir. The above-water reservoir area was measured from aerial photography obtained in October

1994. The reservoir topography was developed by a computer graphics program using the collected data.

As of April 1995, at top of dam elevation 2,218 feet, the reservoir surface area was 31,852 acres and total capacity

was 3,432,408 acre-feet. Since the initial filling in 1909, about 182,185 acre-feet of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir

capacity have been lost below elevation 2,136 feet (top of existing active conservation capacity), resulting in a 12-

percent loss in reservoir volume. Since 1909, the average annual rate of reservoir capacity lost below elevation

2,136 feet is 2,121 acre-feet per year.

14. SUBJECT TERMS- -reservoir area and capacity! sedimentationl reservoir surveys! 15. NUMBER OF PAGES

sonar! sediment distribution! contour area! reservoir area! sedimentation survey! 66

16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

OF REPORT

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

OF ThIS PAGE

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

OF ABSTRACT

20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

UL

.it., ,eAa a nan rena

UL UL UL

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

Preectibed by ANSI Std. 239-18

298-102
THEODORE ROOSEVELT RESERVOIR

1995 SEDIMENTATION SURVEY

by

Joe Lyons and Lori Lest

Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group

Water Resources Services

Technical Service Center

Denver, Colorado

May 1996
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Bureau of Reclamation's Sedimentation and River Hydraulics

Group of the TSC (Technical Service Center) prepared and

published this report. Joe Lyons was the TSC team leader for the

preparation of this report and Ron Ferrari conducted the

hydrographic survey. Lori Lest and Norm Prince of the TSC and

Rick Navratil from the Phoenix Area Office assisted in the

completion of the report. Personnel from the Phoenix Area Office

performed the required land survey for the hydrographic and

aerial data collection. Rick Navratil conducted the aerial

photography and hydrographic data interpretation needed to

generate the new topographical maps and area-capacity tables.

Ron Ferrari performed the peer review of this documentation.

U.S. Department of the Interior

Mission Statement

As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the

Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally-owned public lands

and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land

and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological

diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our

national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of

life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy

and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in

the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and

citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major

responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for

people who live in island territories under U.S. administration.

The information contained in this report regarding commercial

products or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional

purposes and is not to be construed as an endorsement of any

product or firm by the Bureau of Reclamation.

The information contained in this report was developed for the

Bureau of Reclamation; no warranty as to the accuracy,

usefulness, or completeness is expressed or implied.

II
CONTENTS

........................................................................

............................................................

.................................................................

.............................................

..................................................................

.........................................................

.....................................................

.............................................................

...........................................................

..........................................................

.................................................

.............................................................

..........................................................

.........................................................................

...................................

...................................

...................................

.........................

...............................

...............................

..............

..............

.....................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

Introduction

Summary and conclusions

Reservoir operations

Hydrographic survey equipment and method

Survey history

Boat and shore equipment

GPS technology and equipment

1995 survey methods

Reservoir area and capacity

Topography development

Development of 1995 contour areas

1995 storage capacity

Reservoir sediment analyses

References

Table

TABLES

Page

3

3

3

5

6

6

7

7

8

9

1 Reservoir sediment data summary (page 1 of 3) 10

1 Reservoir sediment data summary (page 2 of 3) 11

1 Reservoir sediment data summary (page 3 of 3) 12

2 Summary of 1995 survey results and sediment distribution 13

3 Roosevelt Dam range line bank stations (page 1 of 2) 14

3 Roosevelt Dam range line bank stations (page 2 of 2) 15

FIGURES

Figure

la Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir topography and location map (sheet 1 of 2) 17

lb Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir topography and location map (sheet 2 of 2) 19

2 1995 area and capacity curves for Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 21

3 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground proffle for range line 1 22

4 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 2 23

5 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 3 24

6 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 4 25

7 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground proffle for range line 5 26

8 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 6 27

9 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground proffle for range line 7 28

10 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 8 29

11 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 9 30

12 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 10 31

13 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 11 32

14 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 12 33

15 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 13 34

16 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 14 35

17 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 15 36

18 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 16 37

19 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 17 38

20 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 18 39

21 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 19 40

22 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 20 41

111
CONTENTS -CONTINUED

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

........................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

........................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

...............

..............

FIGURES -CONTINUED

Figure Page

23 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 21 42

24 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 22 43

25 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 23 44

26 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 24 45

27 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 30 46

28 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 31 47

29 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 32 48

30 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 33 49

31 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 34 50

32 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 35 51

33 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 36 52

34 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 37 53

35 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 38 54

36 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 39 55

37 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 40 56

38 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 41 57

39 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 42 58

40 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 43 59

41 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground proffle for range line 50 60

42 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 60 61

43 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 70 62

44 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 71 63

45 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 80 64

46 Thalweg profile for the Salt River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 65

47 Thalweg profile for the Tonto River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir 66

lv
INTRODUCTION

Theodore Roosevelt Dam was the first major structure built by the Reclamation Service (now

the Bureau of Reclamation [Reclamation]) after its formation in 1902 by the Reclamation Act.

Construction of the dam began in 1903 and was completed in 1911. Located about 80 miles

northeast of Phoenix, Arizona, on the Salt River, the dam is part of the multipurpose Salt River

Project that controls floods, generates power, and stores irrigation water.

A modification to the structural height of Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the dam

crest elevation to 2,218 feet, an increase of 77 feet above the pre-modified dam crest elevation

of 2,141 feet. As recomputed in 1981 (Lara, 1982), the original (as surveyed in 1909) capacity

of the lake was 1,530,499 acre-feet at elevation 2,136 feet. The surface area at elevation 2,136

feet was measured at 17,826 acres in 1909. The 1995 survey resulted in a surface area of

19,075 acres at elevation 2,136 feet and a capacity of 1,348,314 acre-feet at this elevation.

Roosevelt Dam controls runoff from the Salt River, Tonto Creek, and many smaller tributaries.

The Salt River arm of the lake is about 16 miles long; the Tonto Creek arm is about 11 miles

long (fig. 1). The net sediment contributing area above the reservoir is 5,709 square miles.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This report presents the 1995 results of the first extensive reservoir survey of Theodore

Roosevelt Lake. AU seven previous reservoir surveys were completed by re-surveying

established range lines across the reservoir. In 1995, a complete bathymetric survey of the

lake was accomplished. The primary objectives of the survey were to gather data needed to:

• develop reservoir topography to be used as the basis for computing sediment accumulation

and for future surveys

• compute area-capacity relationships

• resolve conflicts about storage capacity

• estimate storage depletion caused by sedimentation deposition since closure of Theodore

Roosevelt Dam

The bathymetric survey was run using sonic depth recording equipment interfaced with a

DGPS (differential global positioning system) capable of determining sounding locations within

the reservoir. The system continuously recorded depth and horizontal coordinates of the

survey boat as it was navigated along grid lines covering Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir. The

positioning system provided information to allow the boat operator to maintain course along

these grid lines. Water surface elevations recorded by a Reclamation gage during the time of

collection were used to convert the sonic depth measurements to true lake bottom elevations.

* The definition of terms such as "structural height," 'hydraulic height, etc., may be found in manuals such as

Reclamation's Design of Small Dams and Guide for Preparation of Standing Operating Procedures for Dams and

Reseivoirs, or ASCE's Nomenclature for Hydraulics.
The above-water Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir area was measured from aerial photography

obtained in October 1994. Photo interpretation produced horizontal positioning and elevations

throughout the reservoir area. The new reservoir contour map is a combination of the aerial

and underwater survey data. The 1995 reservoir surface areas at predetermined 5-foot contour

intervals were generated by a computer graphics program using the collected data. The area

and capacity tables were produced by a computer program that uses measured contour surface

areas and a curve-fitting technique to compute area and capacity at prescribed elevation

increments.

Table 1 summarizes the reservoir sedimentation and watershed characteristics for the 1995

survey. The 1995 survey determined that the reservoir has a total storage capacity of

1,348,314 acre-feet and a surface area of 19,075 acres at water surface elevation 2,136 feet.

Since closure in 1909, the reservoir has accumulated an estimated volume of 182,185 acre-feet

of sediment below elevation 2,136 feet during the period of 85.9 years. This volume represents

a 12-percent loss in total capacity and an average annual loss of 2,121 acre-feet.

Previous estimates of reservoir area and capacity were based upon topographic mapping

developed from plane table surveys accomplished in the early part of this century. The

bathymetric surveying and aerial photography done for the 1995 survey resulted in a much

improved (more accurate) estimate of existing reservoir area and capacity.

RESERVOIR OPERATIONS

The reservoir is a multi-use facility having (following values are from the Water Resources

Management Division, PxAO-7450, Phoenix Area Office, Bureau of Reclamation):

• 1,223,169 acre-feet of surcharge storage between elevations 2,175 feet and 2,218 feet.

• 556,196 acre-feet of flood control space between elevations 2,151 feet and 2,175 feet.

• 1,634,391 acre-feet of active conservation storage space between elevations 1,989 feet and

2,151 feet.

• 18,652 acre-feet of dead storage below elevation 1,989 feet.

The capacities are dynamic in that they will undergo periodic adjustment approximately every

10 years based on a complex agreement between several valley cities, Salt River Project, and

Reclamation. Some of the capacities as listed in this section are not the initial capacities that

will be used after the dam is declared substantially complete.

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir receives the majority of its inflow from the Salt River and Tonto

Creek watersheds. Available records for calendar years 1909 through 1995 show that the

average inflow into the reservoir was 752,279 acre-feet per year. This inflow computes to a

mean annual runoff of 2.47 inches for the 5,709-square-mile basin. The inflow and end-ofmonth stage records in table 1 show the annual fluctuation of the reservoir. Project operations

began in May 1907, and storage operations started 2 years later in May 1909. Available

records show Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir operation ranging from elevation 1,947 feet in

water year 1910 to elevation 2,139 feet in water year 1993.

2
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY EQUIPMENT AND METHOD

Survey History

The original Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir topographic map, drawing 25-P-48, dated April

1915, shows the stations of the range line endpoints in the 1915 local survey coordinates. No

other information on surface area and contour development was located. It is assumed the

original surface areas were mapped by a plane table survey, prior to dam closure, at a 10-foot

contour accuracy. The original surface area values appear in column (2) of table 2. Column (3)

of table 2 gives the original capacity of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir recomputed in 1981 using

the area-capacity computer program ACAP (Reclamation, 1985).

Boat and Shore Equipment

The hydrographic survey equipment was mounted in the cabin of a 24-foot tn-hull aluminum

vessel equipped with twin in-board motors. The hydrographic system contained on the survey

vessel consisted of a GPS (global positioning system) receiver with a built-in radio and

omnidirectional antenna, dual frequency depth sounder, helmsman display for navigation,

plotter, computer, and hydrographic system software for collecting the underwater data.

Power to the equipment was supplied by an on-board generator.

The shore equipment included a second GPS receiver with a built-in radio and omnidirectional

antenna. The GPS receiver and antenna were mounted on a survey tripod over a known datum

point. The power for the shore units was provided by a 12-volt battery. To obtain the

maximum radio transmission range, known datum points with clear line-of-sight to the survey

boat were selected.

GPS Technology and Equipment

The positioning system that was used at Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir was NAVSTAR

(NAVigation Satellite Timing and Ranging) GPS, an all weather, radio based, satellite

navigation system that enables users to accurately determine 3-dimensional position. The

NAVSTAR system's primary mission is to provide passive global positioning and navigation

for land, air, and sea based strategic and tactical forces and is operated and maintained by

DOD (Department of Defense). The GPS receiver measures the distances between the

satellites and itself and determines the receiver's position from the intersections of the multiple

range vectors. Distances are determined by accurately measuring the time a signal pulse takes

to travel from the satellite to the receiver.

The NAVSTAR system consists of three segments:

• The space segment is a network of 24 satellites maintained in precise orbits,about 10,900

nautical miles above the earth, each completing an orbit every 12 hours.

The ground control segment tracks the satellites, determines their precise orbits, and

periodically transmits correction and other system data to all the satellites, which are then

retransmitted to the user segment.

• The user segment is the GPS receivers, which measure the broadcasts from the satellites

and calculate the position of the receivers.
The GPS receivers use the satellites as reference points for triangulating their position on

earth. The position is calculated from distance measurements to the satellites that are

determined by the time a radio signal takes to reach the receiver from the satellite. To

calculate the receiver's position on earth, the satellite distance and the satellite's position in

space are needed. The satellites transmit signals to the GPS receivers for distance

measurements along with the data messages about their exact orbital location and operational

status. The satellites transmit two 'EL" band frequencies for the distance measurement signals

called Li and L2. At least four satellite observations are required to mathematically solve for

the four unknown receiver parameters (latitude, longitude, altitude, and time). The time

unknown is caused by the clock error between the expensive satellite atomic clocks and the

imperfect clocks in the GPS receivers. For hydrographic surveying of altitude, the Theodore

Roosevelt Reservoir water surface elevation parameter was known, which realistically meant

only three satellite observations were needed to track the survey vessel. During the Theodore

Roosevelt Reservoir survey, at least five satellites were used for position calculations. During

much of the survey, the best six available satellites were used to determine the position of the

survey vessel.

The GPS receiver's absolute position is not as accurate as it appears in theory because of the

function of range measurement precision and geometric position of the satellites. Precision is

affected by several factors: time, because of the clock differences; and atmospheric delays

caused by the effect on the radio signal by the ionosphere. GDOP (geometric dilution of

precision) describes the geometrical uncertainty and is a function of the relative geometry of

the satellites and the user. Generally, the closer together in angle two satellites are from the

receiver, the greater the GDOP. GDOP is broken into components: PDOP is position dilution

of precision (x,y,z); HDOP is horizontal dilution of precision (x,y). The components are based

only on the geometry of the satellites. The PDOP and HDOP were monitored during the

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir Survey, and for the majority of the time, they were less than 3,

which is well within the acceptable limits of horizontal accuracy for Class 1 and Class 2 level

surveys (Corps of Engineers, 1991).

An additional and larger error source of GPS collection is caused by false signal projection,

called S/A (selective availability). The DOD implements S/A to discourage the use of the

satellite system as a guidance tool by hostile forces. Positions determined by a single receiver

when S/A is active can have errors of up to 100 meters.

A method of collection to resolve or cancel the inherent errors of GPS (satellite position or S/A,

clock differences, atmospheric delay, etc.) is called DGPS (differential GPS). DGPS was used

during the Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir survey to determine positions of the moving survey

vessel in real time. DGPS determines the position of one receiver in reference to another and

is a method of increasing position accuracies by eliminating or minimizing the uncertainties.

Differential positioning is not concerned with the absolute position of each unit, but with the

relative difference between the positions of the two units, which are simultaneously observing

the same satellites. The inherent errors are mostly canceled because the satellite transmission

is essentially the same at both receivers.

At a known geographical benchmark, one GPS receiver is programmed with the known

coordinates and stationed over the geographical benchmark. This receiver, known as the

master or reference unit, remains over the known benchmark, monitors the movement of the

satellites, and calculates its apparent geographical position by direct reception from the

satellites. The inherent errors in the satellite position are determined relative to the master

4
receiver's programmed position, and the necessary corrections or differences are transmitted

to the mobile GPS receiver on the survey vessel. For the Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir Survey,

position corrections were determined by the master receiver and transmitted via a UHF (ultrahigh frequency) radio link every 3 seconds to the survey vessel mobile receiver. The survey

vessel's GPS receiver used the corrections along with the satellite information it received to

determine the vessel's differential location. Using DGPS resulted in positional accuracies of

1 to 2 meters for the moving vessel compared to positional accuracies of 100 meters with a

single receiver.

The TSC (Technical Service Center) mobile and reference GPS units are identical in

construction and consist of a 6-channel Li C/A (coarse acquisition) code continuous parallel

tracking receiver, an internal modem, and a UHF radio transceiver. The differential

corrections from the reference station to the mobile station are transmitted using the industry

standard RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services) message protocol via the

UHF radio link. The programming to the mobile or reference GPS unit is accomplished by

entering necessary information via a notebook computer. The TSC's GPS system has the

capability of establishing or confirming the land base control points by using notebook

computers for logging data and post-processing software. The GPS collection system has the

capability of collecting the data in 1927 or 1983 NAP (North American Datums) in the

surveyed area's state plane coordinate system's zone, which for the 1995 Theodore Roosevelt

Reservoir survey was the Arizona State Plane Coordinates NAD27 Central Zone.

1995 Survey Methods

The Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir hydrographic survey was completed using the contour

method as outlined by Blanton (1982). The procedure involved collecting adequate coordinate

V data for developing a reliable contour map by bathymetric and aerial survey methods. The

bathymetric survey used sonic depth recording equipment interfaced with GPS positioning that

gave continuous sounding positions throughout Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir.

Reclamation's Phoenix Area Office personnel used GPS equipment and standard land

surveying methods to establish horizontal and vertical control points for the hydrographic

survey.

The above-water data were collected by aerial photography obtained on October 28, 1994, at

an approximate reservoir elevation of 2,087 feet. Reclamation's Phoenix Area office conducted

the aerial photography interpretation and provided contour data at 5-foot intervals to define

the reservoir topography.

The Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir bathymetric survey began on April 18, 1995, and concluded

on April 23, 1995. During this time, the average water surface of the reservoir was 2,125.7

feet. The bathymetric survey was run using sonic depth recording equipment interfaced with

a DGPS capable of determining sounding locations within the reservoir. The survey system

software was capable of recording, in 1-second increments, depths and horizontal coordinates

as the survey boat moved along predetermined grid lines covering the reservoir. To produce

adequate data for developing contours of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir, grid lines or transects

accessible by the survey boat were collected at a spacing of 400 feet. Data were collected at an

average of 2-second intervals; additional data were collected along the shore as the boat

traversed to the next transect. The survey vessel's guidance system gave directions to the boat

operator to assist in maintaining course along these predetermined grid lines. During each
run, the depth and position data were recorded on the notebook computer hard drive for

subsequent processing by TSC personnel. A graph plotter was used in the field to track the

boat and ensure adequate coverage during the collection process. The underwater data set

included 70,500 coordinate points. Water surface elevations recorded by a Reclamation gage

at the dam were used to convert the sonic depth measurements to true lake bottom elevations.

The TSC's depth sounder has a 208-kilohertz transducer that reflects the first-encountered

bottom surface which is used for sediment surveys. The bottom is determined by measuring

elapsed time between the transmission of the sound pulse from the transducer to the waterway

bottom and the reception of its echo at the transducer. Prior to data collection and periodically

through the survey, the depth sounder was calibrated by lowering a deflector plate below the

boat by cables with known depths marked by beads. The depth sounder was calibrated by

adjusting the speed of sound, which can vary with water density, salinity, temperature,

turbidity, and other conditions. The accuracy of an instantaneous reading from the depth

finder is estimated to be ±0.5 feet, but these errors are minimized over the entire survey. The

estimated accuracy takes into consideration calibration error and the collection of depth data

when the boat is moving. The collected data were digitally transmitted to the computer

collection system via an RS232 port. The depth sounder also produces an analog hard copy

chart of the measured depths. These analog charts were printed for all survey lines as the data

were collected and recorded by the computer. The charts were analyzed during post

processing, and when the analog-charted depths indicated a difference from the recorded

computer bottom depths, the computer data files were modified to agree with the analog chart

depth.

RESERVOIR AREA AND CAPACITY

Topography Development

The aerial photography was obtained October 28, 1994, at elevation 8,000 feet a.m.t. (above

mean terrain). Fifty-eight photogrammetric maps were created from this photography. The

maps were compiled at a scale of 1 inch = 200 feet with a 5-foot contour interval. The elevation

range was 2,090 feet to 2,225 feet plus the water surface of 2,087.0 feet and the new top of dam

elevation, 2,218.0 feet. The contours were digitized directly from the photographs using an

SD2000 Stereo Plotter and DAT/EM mapping software at Reclamation's Phoenix Area Office.

CADD (computer aided design and drafting) software was used to create 3-dimensional models

of the reservoir. For purposes of computing areas and saving disk space, the contours were

filtered to a scale of 1 inch = 500 feet. This filtering involved removing as many vertex points

as possible from any given contour without changing the accuracy of the contour.

For contours below elevation 2,087 feet, the sounding information collected by Denver TSC

personnel was used to develop the contour map. About 70,500 data points were collected

during April 18 to 23, 1995. The water surface elevation at this time averaged 2,125.7 feet.

This procedure gave a desired overlap of the aerial and underwater mapping. Sounding data

points above elevation 2,087 feet were eliminated from the data set. Using the digitized water

line (elevation 2,087 feet) and the remaining sounding points, contours were developed for the

underwater area using TIN (triangulated irregular network) software. These contours were

created every 5 feet from elevation 1,965 feet to elevation 2,085 feet. Manual editing of the

contours was performed in the CADD software to eliminate inconsistencies and to produce

hard copy maps. The contours were then filtered to a scale of 1 inch = 500 feet to match the

above water contours.

6
Development of 1995 Contour Areas

The 1995 contour surface areas for Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir were computed in 5-foot

intervals from elevation 1,965 feet to elevation 2,225 feet using the TIN and aerial mapping

data discussed above. The areas for each elevation were computed in acres. This procedure

was done using CADD software for the computation of the area of a closed, planar polygon.

Deductions were made for any island contours within the main contour for a given elevation.

Based on the input data, elevation 1,963 feet was determined to be the low point in the

reservoir. An area was also calculated for elevation 1,964 feet. The 1995 topography for

Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir is shown on figures la and lb.

1995 Storage Capacity

The storage-elevation relationships based on the measured surface areas were developed using

the area-capacity computer program ACAP (Reclamation, 1985). The 1995 surface areas at 5-

foot contour intervals from elevation 1,965 feet to 2,225 feet, plus 1,963 feet, 1,964 feet, and

2,218 feet, were used as the control parameters for computing the Theodore Roosevelt

Reservoir capacity. The program can compute an area and capacity at elevation increments

of 0.01- to 1.0-foot by linear interpolation between the given contour surface areas. The

program begins by testing the initial capacity equation over successive intervals to ensure that

the equation fits within an allowable error limit, which was set at 0.0000001 for Theodore

Roosevelt Reservoir. This capacity equation is then used over the full range of intervals fitting

within this allowable error limit. For the first interval at which the initial allowable error limit

is exceeded, a new capacity equation (integrated from the basic area curve over that interval)

tests the fit until it also exceeds the error limit. Thus, the capacity curve is defined by a series

of curves, each fitting a certain region of data. Final area equations are derived by

differentiating the capacity equations, which are of second order polynomial form:

y = a1 + a2x + a3x2

where:

y = capacity

x = elevation above a reference base

a1 = intercept

a2 and a3 = coefficients

Results of the 1995 Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir area and capacity computations are listed

in tables 1 and 2 and plotted on figure 2. A set of 1995 area and capacity tables was developed

for the 0.1-foot elevation increments (Reclamation). These tables are dated November 30,

1995. Computation results are listed in columns (4) and (5) of table 2. Column (2) in the table

gives the original measured contour areas used in the original area and capacity computation,

and column (3) gives the original capacity recomputed using ACAP. Both the original and 1995

area and capacity curves are plotted on figure 2. As of April 1995, at the top of the existing

spillway at elevation 2,136 feet, the surface area was 19,075 acres and the capacity was

1,348,314 acre-feet.
RESERVOIR SEDIMENT ANALYSES

Since Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir storage began in 1909, the computed volume difference

between the original and 1995 capacities is 182,185 acre-feet below top of existing active

conservation capacity elevation 2,136 feet. The average annual rate of lost capacity was 2,121

acre-feet per year, or 0.372 acre-foot per square mile per year from the sediment contributing

drainage area of 5,709 square miles. The storage difference in terms of percent of original

storage capacity was 88 percent.

Sediment calculations in the 1995 study were based on the difference between the original and

1995 measured reservoir capacities. This method would account for all sediment accumulation

during the 85.9 years of reservoir operation, but the calculations are only as accurate as the

two surveys. Based on the obvious differences in mapping accuracy for the 1995 and 1915

contour maps of the Roosevelt Lake area, the surface areas and capacities for the range of

operational elevations at the lake for 1995 should be compared to earlier estimates of

sedimentation at Roosevelt Lake. Table 1 contains the Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir storage

calculations with differences based on the 1995 resurvey and compared to the 1981 survey.

Although similar, the estimates for average annual loss in capacity to sedimentation are

sufficiently different to warrant consideration in future planning and storage allocation

activities.

Because future reservoir surveys will be compared to the 1995 reservoir topography, the

capacity and sediment distributions computed from these data are important. For computing

estimates of future sedimentation rates, the data generated from the 1981 survey may be more

applicable than the estimates based upon comparison of the 1995 survey and the original

topography. The 1981 survey and analysis has the advantage of adjustments to a common map

base between surveys (original and 1981). In contrast, the analysis for the 1995 survey relied

upon comparison of two different map bases of apparently dissimilar accuracies. The intended

use of the data should be considered when choosing the sedimentation analysis results for a

particular application.

Comparative analyses for all range lines established in 1909 and surveyed in 1995 are

presented on figures 3 through 45. The 1995 traces for these comparisons are from the 1995

topographic map developed from the recent bathymetric survey and aerial photogrammetry.

These range lines were established by locating the endpoint coordinates for each range line

within the topographic map developed from the 1995 survey and producing a range line profile

from the map product. The 1909 (original) cross section shape of each range line was developed

from the original topography for Roosevelt Lake.

These comparative piots reveal significant differences in the above water portion of the range

lines between 1909 and 1995. These differences relate to the differences in techniques used

to generate these maps as well as the related map accuracy. In some cases, the original

profiles do not extend to the present-day endpoints. For these profiles, only the available

portion of the original is shown on the comparative plot.

Profiles of the Salt River and Tonto Creek portions of the reservoir are shown on figures 46 and

47. These profiles were developed from the thalweg elevations (original and 1995) for each

range line along the two arms of the lake. Distances between the range lines were established

from the 1995 topographic map of Roosevelt Lake.
The coordinates and elevations for each sedimentation survey range line endpoint at Theodore

Roosevelt reservoir are shown in table 3. Future reservoir surveys will likely be conducted

using these data to produce comparative plots of these range lines to monitor sedimentation

within the reservoir area.

REFERENCES

American Society of Civil Engineers, Nomenclature for Hydraulics, ASCE Headquarters, New

York, 1962.

Blanton, J.O. III, Procedures for Monitoring Reservoir Sedimentation: Technical Guideline

for Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Office, Denver, CO, October 1982.

Bureau of Reclamation, Surface Water Branch, ACAP85 User's Manual, Technical Service

Center, Denver, Colorado, 1985.

Bureau of Reclamation, Guide for Preparation of Standing Operating Procedures for Bureau

of Reclamation Dams and Reservoirs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, CO, 1987a.

Bureau of Reclamation, Design of Small Dams, U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, CO,

1987b.

Corps of Engineers, Application of Differential Global Positioning System for Hydrographic

Survey and Dredge Positioning, ETL 1110-7-5 (FR), Department of the Army, Washington,

DC, March 1991.

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., ARC Command References, 1992.

Lara, J. M., Theodore Roosevelt Lake - 1981 Sedimentation Survey, Report REC-ERC-82-18,

Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, September 1982.
Table 1. - Reservoir sediment data summary (page 1 of 3).

RESERVOIR SEDIMENT

Theodore Roosevelt Lake

604b

DATA SARY

NAME OF RESERVOIR

DATA SHEET NO.

O 1. OWNER Salt RavRr Frolect 2. STREAM Salt River & Tonto Creek 3. STATE AriZona

A 4. SEC 20, T4N, R12E 5. NEAREST P0 Globe 35 NW 6. COINS'S lila

M 7. LAY 33' 33' 13" LONG 1110 26' 33" 6. TOP OF DAM ELEV, 2218' 9. SPILLWAY CREST ELEV, 2214

5 10. STORAGE 11. ELEVATION 12. ORIGINAL 12. ORIGINAL 14. GROSS STORAGE 15. DATE S ALLOCATION TOP OF POOL SURFACE AREA, Ac CAPACITY, AF ACRE FEET STORAGE S BEGAN

R _____________________________

v a, FLOOD CONTROL

______________________________ ____________________________ ________________________________

0 _______________________________ _____________________________

I b. MULTIPLE USE

R

_____________________________ ___________________________ May 1909

C. POWER

___________________________

d. WATER SUPPLY 2136' 17,826 1,522200 1,522200'

e. IRRIGATION 16.DATE NORMAL

OPERATION BEGAN

8. CONSERVATION

5. INACTIVE

May 1957'

17. LENGTH OP RESERVOIR 26.7' MILES AVG. WIDTH OF RESERVO1e 1.04 MILES

18. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 5.736 IC. MI. 22. MEAN ANNUAL PRECIPITATION 21.0 INCHES

1 19. NET SEDIMENT CONTRIBUTING AREA 5,719 IS. MI. 23. MAR54 AINNAL 51540FF 2.39 INCHES

N

20. LENGTH 117 MI. AV. WIDTH HI MI. 24. MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF 726,678 AC-FT.

21. MAX. ELEV. 11,500 FT. WIN, ELEV. 1929 FT. 20. ANNUAL TEMP. MEAN 56.7 RANGE 37.7 to 76.6

5 26. DATE OF 27. 26. 25. TYPE OF 35, NO. OF - 31. SURFACE 32. CAPACITY 33. C/I I SURVEY PER. ACCL. SURVEY RANGES OR AREA, AC. ACRE-FEET RATIO AL/AR H SRI. YRS. INTERVAL

V

E

S

' A

GateS Closed

A 1909 0 5 Contour ID) 10-ft interval 17,785 1,530,499" 2.11

Sep 1981 72.4 72.4 Range CD) 39 17,337 1,336,734 1.84

Apr 1995 13.5 85.9 Contour CD) 5-ft interval 19,075 1,348,314'' 1.86

26. DATE OF 34. PERI,.,D 35. PERIOD WATER INFLOW, ACRE FEET 36. WATER INFLOW '10 PATE AF SURVEY ANNUAL

,

PRECI P.

a. MEAN ANN. b. MAX. ANN. c. TOTAL a. MEAN ANN. b. TOTAL

Sep 1981

,

21.0 717,131 2,582,996 50,199,184 717,131 50,199,184

Apr 1995 22.5 1,035,485 2,744,900 14,496,790 752,279 64,695,974

26. DATE OF 33. PERIOD CAPACITY LOSS, ACRE-FEET 38. TOTAL SEDIM4'I uEPOSITS TO DATE, AX SURVEY

a. TOTAL So AV. ANN. C. /MI.'-YR. a. TOTAL b. AV. ANNUAL C. /MI.-YR.

Sep 1981 193,765 2,676 0.469 193,765 2,676 0.469

Apr 1995 see footnote 8 see footnote H see footnote 8 182,185' 2,121' 0.372'

26. DATE OF 36. Ày. DRY WY. 40. SEP. DSP. TONS/MI.'-YH. 41. STORAGE LOSS, PITS'. 42 SEP SURVEY 0/Er') . .

INFLOW, PPM

a. PERIOD P. TOTAL TO a. AV. H. TOTAl. TO a. b. DATE ANNUAL DATE PER. TOT.

Sep 1981 49.3 504 504 0.175 12.67 3,154 3,055

Apr 1995 N/A N/A N/A 1.139' 11,90' N/A N/A

10
Table 1. - Reservoir sediment data summary (page 2 of 3).

26. 43 DEPTH DESIGNATION RANGE IN FEET BELOW AND ABOVE CABOT ELEVATION (2236 ft crest Blevation)

DATE OF

SURVEY

234- 206 - 166 - 126 - 86 - 36 -

206 166 126 86 36 crest

PERCENT OF TOTAL SEDIMENT LOCATED WITHIN DEPTH DESIGNATION

April

1995 1.5 15.0 26.6 27.3 28.7 0,9

26, 44. REACH DESIGNATION PERCENT OF TOTAL ORIGINAL LENGTH OF RESERVOIR

DATE OF 0-10 10- 20- 30- 40- 55- 60- 70- 85- 90- 100- 105- 110- 115- 120- SURVEY 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 105 110 115 120 125

PERCENT OF TOTAL SEDIMENT LOCATED WITHIN REACH DESIGNATION

Aprsl

1995 N/A

45, RANGE IN RESERVOIR OPERATION

WATER YEAR MAX. ELEV. MIN. ELEV. INFLOW AF WATER YEAR MAX. ELEV. WIN. ELEV. INFLOW, AR

1910 2025 1947 454365 1952 2123,43 2009,51 286,986

1911 2069 1963 800,250 1953 2116.59 2087.03 200,666

1912 2079 2051 548,027 1954 2093.11 2077,69 491,741

1913 2069 2033 401,85'? 1955 2082.93 2037.40 839,302

1914 2044 2012 530,770 1956 2044.70 1972.18 548,771

1915 2127 2012 1,782,758 1957 2032.88 1986.87 491,741

1916 2127 2106 2,582,996 1958 2079,02 2000.58 839,302

1917 2127 2092 816,505 1959 2076.75 2032.20 584,771

1918 2103 2045 394,512 1960 2119.58 2077.02 737,340

1919 2073 2036 991,274 1961 2103.50 2074.60 212,370

1920 2127 2072 1,890,016 1962 2107.83 2078.68 767,021

1921 2100 2068' 546,283 1963 2091.90 2057.84 446,036

1922

'

2103 2072 688,488 1964 2068.13 2034.54 292,497

1923 2080 2052 612,431 1965 2132.46 2048.61 1,407,435

1924 2105 2053 903,937 1966 2135.47 2123.45 756,767

1925 2066 1990 328,067 1967 2125.29 2105.35 383,794

1926 2075 1990 . 783,887 1968 2135.52 2114.60 1,006,598

1927 2093 2038 959,292 1969 2130.92 2114.88 617,967

1928 2068 2007 317,279 1970 2114.82 2080.46 349,271

1929 2005 1962 471,874 1971 2096.13 2068,54 471,764

1930 1995 1952 397,997 1972 2098.50 2032.45 748,406

1931 2019 1952 639,182 1973 2135.88 2096.68 1,642,102

1932 2114 1968 1,394,960 1974 2118.73 2081.88 266,586

1933 2099 2076 473,897 1975 2112.73 2086.85 621,110

1934 2076 1975 263,624 1976 2104.49 2082.44 419,679

1935 2071 1962 760,101 1977 2084.24 2015.12 211,884

1936 2070 2026 689,187 1978 2132.46 2024.05 2,037,484

1937 2107 2038 1,018,347 1979 2135.95 2117.70 1,743,995

1938 2082 2007 398,797 1980 2136.83 2118.75 1,729,915

1939 2008 1957 381,849 1981 2120.81 2088.98 340,740

1940 1991 1955 309,658 1982 2128.45 2093.86 766,700

1941 2136 1955 2,267,919 1983 2135.92 2120.63 1,660,800

1942 2131 2117 609,213 1984 2131.41 2113.10 889,400

1943 2125 2102 595,101 1985 2135.98 2118.85 1,640,700

1944 2107 2086 427,664 1986 2135.74 2115.33 683,200

1945 2098 2081 349,100 1987 2135.88 2117.55 804,570

1946 2073.49 1986.65 396.127 1988 2133.35 2118.50 775,900

1947 2032.01 1954.95 312,384 1989 2125,45 2090.58 296,080

1948 2030.58 1976.54 464,169 1990 2092.33 2065.92 220,230

1949 2069,22 1993.95 815,771 1991 2134.24 2074.20 1,249,300

1950 2060.47 1970.93 205,444 1992 2123.65 2105.51 1,055,100

1951 2025.28 1971.08 367,416 1993 2139.34 2102.09 2,744,900

11
Table 1. - Reservoir sediment data summary (page 3 of 3).

45. RANGE IN RESERVOIR OPERATION con't.

WATER YEAR MAX ELEV WIN ELEV INFLOW AT WATER YEAR MAX ELEV WIN. ELEV INFLOW AF

1994 211282 208743 450010

1995 213007 209907 1259900

46. ELEVATION - AREA - CAPACITY DATA

ELEV. AREA CAP, ELEV. AREA CAP. ELEV. AREA CAP.

1965 157 80

1970 551 1850

1980 927 9,120

1990 1,211 19,850

2000 2,198 36,147

2010 3,440 64,357

2020 4,273 103,035

2030 4,954 149,442

2040 5,581 202,025

2050 6,714 262,987

2060 7,979 336,245

2070 9,396 423,232

2080 10,769 524,050

2090 12,194 638,669

2100 13,579 767,887

2110 14,831 909,867

2120 16,356 1,065,544

2130 18,000 1,237,049

2140 19.746 1,425,957

2150 21, 351 1.631,622

2160 22,732 1,852,129

2170 24,163 2,086,387

2180 25,753 2,336,067.

2190 27,402 2,601,879

2200 29,053 2,884,154

2210 30,614 3,182,584

2220 32,221 3,496,484

47. RENARKS ANt) REFERENCES

Modification to Roosevelt Dam completed in 1995 raised the darn and spillway elevations. Original dam elevation was 2142 and spsllway

elevation was 2136.

Storage allocation breakdown unknown.

= Modification to Roosevelt Dent in 1995 raised the water supply allocatron to elevation 2218 feet and the capacity to 3,432,408 acre-feet.

= Date of project operation. Date of normal dam operation unavailable.

= Salt River Arm = 15.8 miles; Tonto Creek Arm = 10.9 miles.

1909 ares and capacity values recomputed in 1981 by current methods for comparison wi th 1995 area and capacity values to compute

sediment deposition.

= Capacity in 1995 at elevation 2136 recomputed using map developed from 1995 surveys.

= The increased intensity of bathymetry survey, along with increased map detail, results in lower sediment deposition estimates for 1995

when compared to the 1981 survey results,

Inflow, maximum, and minimum elevation data from Salt River Project files.

48. AGENCY MAKING SURVEY Bureau of Reclamation

49. AGENCY SUPPLYING DATA Bureau of Reclamation DATE. April 1996

12
Table 2. - Summary of 1995 survey results and sediment distribution.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Etevatmn Origmal Original 1995 1995

(It) Area Capacity Area Capacity

(acres) (acre-It) (acres) )acre-ft)

(6) (7)

Computed Percent of

Sediment Computed

Volume Sediment

(acre-it)

2220 32221 3,496484

2210 30614 3,182,584

2200 29,053 2,884,154

2190 27,402 2,601,879

2180 25,753 2,336,067

2170 24,163 2,086,387

2160 22,732 1,852,129

2150 21,351 1,631,622

2140 19,746 1,425,957

2136 17,785 1,530,499 19,075 1,348,314 182,185 100.0

2130 17,203 1,428,512 18,000 1,237,049 188,463 103.5

2120 16,177 1,258,547 16,356 1,065,544 193,003 105.9

2110 15,095 1,102,215 14,831 909,867 192,348 105.6

2100 14,140 956,455 13,579 767,887 188,568 103.5

2090 15,247 819,272 12.194 638,669 180,603 99.1

2080 11,939 693,325 10,769 524,050 169,265 92.9

2070 10,638 580,590 9,396 423,232 157,358 86.4

2060 9,482 479,928 7,979 336,245 143,683 78.9

2050 8,262 391,207 6,714 262,987 128,220 70.4

2040 7,106 314,623 5,581 202,025 112,598 61.8

2030 6,216 248,009 4,954 149,442 98,567 54.1

2020 5,286 190,334 4,273 103,035 87,299 47.9

2010 4,264 142,903 3,440 64,357 78,546 43.1

2000 3,544 103,787 2.198 36,147 67,640 37.1

1990 2,744 72,347 1,211 19,850 52,497 28.8

1980 1,985 48,867 927 9,120 39,747 21.8

1970 1,428 31,935 551 1,850 30,085 16.5

1960 1,020 19,743 19.743 10.8

1950 677 11,328 11,328 6.2

1940 419 5,893 5,893 3.2

1930 227 2,735 2,735 1.5

1920 117 1,059 1,059 0.6

1910 52 211 211 0.1

1902 0 0 0 0.0

Explanatam of celumna

(1) Elevation of reservoir water surface.

(2) Original reservoir surface area. Hooevelt Dam was modified, which raised the pool elevation to 2218

(3) Original reservoir capacity. The modification increased the capacity to 3,432,408 acre-feet.

(4) Reservoir surface area determined from 1995 survey.

(5) Reservoir capacity from 1995 survey.

(6) Aceumulated sediment volume column (3)- column (5).

(7) Measured sediment expressed as percentage of total measured sediment (188,463 &cre-ft).

13
Table 3. - Roosevelt Dam range line bank stations (page 1 of 2).

FROM 1981 SURVEY FROM 1995 G.P.S. SURVEY

LOCAL SYSTEM Elevation AZ ST PLN COORD. NAD27

Name of DIwg. K-653-104.1. 8/81 (feet) CENTRAL ZONE (US feet)

Range Une Looking Downstream Bank Station NORTHING EAST1NG NORTHNG EASTING

1 Left Bank 1A 29868.626 60414.562 2130.62 972569.798 730410.915

1 Right Bank 90C 30509.433 60040.744 2136.28 973208.396 730033.533

2 Left Bank 18 30139.417 80782.903 2136.6 972842.629 730777.670

2 RIght Bank 90B 30764.853 60440.896 214448 973466.038 730432.182

3 Left Bank 1C 30216.711 61206.644 2137.86 972922.305 731200.910

3 Right Bank 90A 31094.811 60708.438 2134.57 973797.457 730697.819

4 Left Bank 2 31494.845 63287.103 2132.49 974211.999 733273.832

4 Right Bank 55A 35027.557 63338.136 2146.4 977744.462 733304.899

5 Left Bank 4A 29863.893 65894.834 2131.72 972596.027 735890.381

5 Right Bank 54 33971 .353 66262.610 2152.69 976704.941 736234.895

6 Left Bank 5 30529.034 68587.052 2136.62 973276.277 73.8578.432

6 Right Bank 53 32759.592 68609.173 2152.21 975506.621 738587.948

7 Left Bank 6 29351.071 70211.233 2137.1 972107.669 740209.021

7 Right Bank SOB 41633.824 70267.596 2170.63 984388.874 740195.983

8 Left Bank 6A 28062.925 72858.359 2141.93 970833.544 742863.053

8 Right Bank SOA 40346.408 72722.392 2142.73 983115.522 72657.679

9 Left Bank 8 28299.791 76747.093 2139 971093.474 746749.827

9 Right Bank 49 39419.342 77208.704 2135.65 982213.943 747148.547

10 Left Bank 9A 29578.814 80727.976 2146.17 972394.593 750722.880

10 Right Bank 46 34776.175 80700.304 2135.97 977591.659 750745.836

11 Left Bank 10 32633.100 81999.315 2150.88 975455.797 751976.770

11 Right Bank 458 63652.027 82024.755 2138.01 1006470.154 751826.962

12 Left Bank 18 24741.857 86504.938 '2152.3 967591.208 756526.290

12 Right Bank 438 34125.667 86568.054 2129.49 976973.949 756536.382

13 Left Bank 20 23660.938 90435.051 2152.43 986532.657 760461.913

13 Right Bank 42B 32947.009 90646.086 2139.39 975818.509 760620.453

14 Left Bank 22 23780.458 94071.163 2151.98 966672.701 764096.797

14 Right Bank 40B 32119.804 94208.343 2146.35 975011.555 764186.842

15 Left Bank 24 21664.571 97712.843 2151.26 964577.710 767749.877

15 Right Bank 39A 29952.502 98479.852 2139.22 972888.714 768469.947

16 -Left Bank 25 22362.295 100534.100 2147.2 965291.267 770566.764

16 Right Bank 38A 28671.271 100596.134 2134.94 971599.634 770593.145

17 Left Bank 26 22909.258 103230.472 2153.2 965853.613 773258.630

17 Right Bank 37A 27394.328 103298.589 2129.36 970338.153 773302.404

18 Left Bank 27 22802.779' 106610.933 2134.88 965766.015 776640.185

18 Right Bank 36A 28555.258 106628.875 2197.07 971517.710 776623.625

19 Left Bank 31 19778.980 109790.050 2176.28 962760.636 779835.902

19 Right Bank 35C 27281.120 111325.890 2241.54 970250.316 781329.238

20 Left Bank 32D 17712.240 113862.220 2175.74 960717.217 783919.129

20 Right Bank 34 24944.650 113391.420 2228.96 967945.888 783407.541

21 Lef(Bank 32E 18511.260 115665.360 2166.7 961526.302 - 785717.481

21 Right Bank 338 24423.420 114725.600 2217.19 967432.254 784744.463

22 Left Bank 32F 18382.560 116894.130 2224.83 959404.868 786958.091

22 Right Bank 32C 23335.320 118320.290 2263.21 966364.628 780344.754

23 Left Bank 32F 16382.580 116894.130 2224.83 959404.868 786958.091

23 Right Bank 32H 15678,470 120895.880 2163.18 958723.493 790963.211

24 Left Bank 32J 12512.570 118818.850 2195.89 955548.340 788904.382

24 Right Bank 32K 13820.670 121527.740 2188.43 958869.545 791605.470

30 Left Bank 56 35086.929 63018.822 2144.92 977802.02 1 732985.298

30 Right Bank 86A 35242.369 57371.857 2130.95 977925.535 727338.313

31 Left Bank 58C 38780.910 63408.890 2137.56 981497.406 733357.813

31 Right Bank 85A 39703.358 54404.420 2142.85 982369.081 724348.124

32 Left Bank 58B 41737.573 64305.501 2140.71 984458.924 734234.208

32 Right Bank . 84 42091 .377 52445.857 2125.32 984745.671 722374.167

33 Left Bank 60 46432.254 58618.916 2134.84 989120.753 728519.96.4

33 Right Bank 83 48596.630 48282.553 2127.44 989226.606 718166.246

34 Left Bank 63 52916.379 54881.464 2128.47 995582.789 724748.447

34 Right Bank 79A , 53062.505 47385.625 2129.91 995686.545 717252.922

35 Left Bank 65 58790.589 50587.953 2127.17 999432.134 720433.701

35 Right Bank 79 53464.514 47120.942 2151.8 996085.758 716986.638

36 Left Bank 68 60623.620 43888.384 2151.73 1003226.753 713713.495

36 Right Bank 77A 53647.029 43840.019 2138.12 996250.949 713704.552

37 Left Bank 69 62181.145 41847.655 2157.73 1004772.512 711664.277

14
Table 3. - Roosevelt Dam range line bank stations (page 2 of 2).

FROM 1981 SURVEY FROM 1995 GP.S. SURVEY

LOCAL SYSTEM Elevation AZ ST PLN COORD. NAD27

Name of Dwg. K-653-104.1, 8/81 (feet) CENTRAL ZONE (US feet)

Range Une Looking Downstream Bank Station NORTHING EASTING NORTHING EAST1NG

37 Right Bank 76A 55482.876 41756.386 2134.05 998074.745 711610.864

38 Left Bank 70 62133.710 39703.218 2164.51 1004712.521 709519.188

38 Right Bank 75C 56951.735 40439.407 2139.48 999535.940 710285.787

39 Left Bank 71B 62627.102 37609.240 213781 1005194.456 707423.987

39 Right Bank 75 59367.075 37050.772 2136.56 1001931.769 706884.021

40 Left Bank 71B 62627.102 37609.240 2137.81 1005194.456 707423.987

40 Right Bank 74 60244.568 34873.547 2133.38 1002796.828 704702.170

41 Left Bank 72 63589.040 33613.170 1006133.671 703423.089

41 Right Bank 73 62162.500 32203.820 1004699.386 702022.013

42 Left Bank 72B 67272.880 33516.780 2188.16 1009816.407 703305.902

42 Right Bank 72E 67220.580 30012.350 2167.91 1009744.316 699802.300

43 Left Bank 72,1 74830.830 33668.060 2207.02 1017374.063 703414.460

43 Right Bank 72H 73086.250 289.40.930 2240.27 1015603.042 698697.904

60 Left Bank 66D 59334.876 47949.102 2145.08 1001961.146 717780.877

60 Right Bank 66C 59129.592 47266.743 2144.15 1001752.038 717099.782

70 Left Bank 45C 36622.358 82915.440 2143.62 979449.624 752870.218

70 Right Bank 45B 63652.027 82024.755 2138.01 1006470.154 751826.962

71 Left Bank 45E 38613.574 82355.559 2137.06 981437.375 752299.172

71 Right Bank 45D 38033.331 80523.783 2185.72 980846.871 750470.953

80 Left Bank 30B 21302.860 107993.620 2183.7 964274.136 778031.136

80 Right Bank 31 19778.980 109790.050 2176.28 962760.636 779835.902

Note: The 1981 local coordinates were converted Into Aiizona state plane coordinates, NA027 Central Zone.

The bold coordinates from the 1995 GPS survey were used to correlate the state plane coordinates to the local coordinates.

15
Z-)U-1UZ4 5 I I I 2 I

r7tO Qaa Arm

D

§

oQo N

(\J

300Q 0 9300

rrzr

§

cZ4T ITEPVL 25 FIT

60

__

Wo £rfac* -j-- N

\'l1L !

2tO LECO

- - - - &b.vi 2067.0 _

w

- N.. -.

'- '-

®

Locot.ol of Rji9

L , ..-

L § o .

B A i \ A LJ5 '

B

N + •.\\ fl$- +

N 2O

§

.

' I ' 1:k rç - -'_ • Tow.iñy or, 'of.o.' 20610 - cm.cld fro"

. 1 - ( -, pAo1aly i O4a6. 28. 94 al i

f..4 AMT 0., a.- f200 .' a

- - U.

.

S 1001 CO

,. . I

'- Tcy b. lo-t 2067.0 afid i4 Tri1id

________ 7 : -

.

, -

.

.41 b.ø, MMId 10 C th of r-oo

- / __-_.•••.---.. - . p.rp of l n -

-

- '

\

'

/

, b T SP At1w. 5ot. Pb., e.

-

_,,.-

,.-, -y .__. ..-., S7l..t C.*i.f Z N4D27 CV2a

I

N 00O -4--- j (

________________________________________________________

F - wYs SAFETY

________ - -

- .

-

0 1$ N

•.40 & AI1I

• - -

'- •

(8 iTl \ J F

- _____

-

0 ' '

.. ,

L TOOORE ROOSt VEL r LAKC

A -

1

'

A

-'F' ':

995 AA Rv CAPAaTY M4PPI'G ModJi.d ..

,

,

-.[ z .-

,

..-

__--a___

I ________ JT01

'9

6

- - \ - -- -____ _______

I

4 3 Figure la. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir topography and location map (sheet 1 of 2). 1 17
4

I 3 I 2

0

0

S

C

C

3000 0 3000 6000 9000

SCALE OF FEET

C0NT HTERVM.. 25 FEET

LENO

Resevok D.hen 205Z0 aid

Sci 'v./Ton(o O..f cuti*z

Lo.o(n of ?*sta* Raip. LMes

Top of modf.d Theo*i koosvci

hai 22.O

B

5

N 550.000

§

8

'a

B

A

NOTES

Tcpoçvophy above Vabo7 2C7.O w co,ct.d Ira,, o.d

p'toto-opAy Ro.n a, Oo(ob.- 28. 94 at ai evet of

mo I.. AA1T The tOO inth a

S tact contor I(a

Tcpoprphy beIo. .vatb, 208Z0 e a.aE.d mg TiaiIaEid

kr.pde- I4.1.IVV* (TN soI(.-e frøm teidef* swx1ps

tafc., a, Apri 1995. A roxa,iat. 70.500 ain,g poa'ls

cokcto

At itotr hove be., Mted to o besI ci l00

for the p,pos of ffi mop.

Cocrat,otq, ore bo,ed a, the Arii,s, Slot. Pb,e Coorat,oie

Syst.n C.,tro Zon. 1(4027 aid M'4)29

ALWAYS T( SAFETY

orpAR1DcI D1VSa,

W ar

5t * .ECT -

OF -

ri-f 000RE ROOSEVEL T LAKE

TtXAPHY A

95 AA RESERV c.4PAaTY M4PPt3

____ _____________

- - _____ IEQIAL VAL

A__-

,etrzorz

'r" I

I Fiaure lb. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir toooiraphv and location map (sheet 2 of 2).
1 S I I

--

35000

2250

2200

2150

w 2100

IS0

- >

. 2050

w

2000

1950

1900

0

Area-Capacity Curves for Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir

Area (acres)

30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0

41

;1

CAPACITY

original Suey L ___ kREA

500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000 3500000

Capacity (acre-feet)

Figure 2. - 1995 area and capacity curves for Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir.
2150.0

2100.0

2050.0

0

0

>

0

Ui 2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Distance From Station IA Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 3. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 1.

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line I

- - Original Survey 1995 Surve1

__ _ /

I /
2150.0

2100.0

2050.0

0

0

c >

0

W 2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 2

[--OnginaI Survey 1995 Surv]

IIII IIiII I tIII1

_100 200 300

:

400_500_600_700_800

Distance From StatIon lB Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 4. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 2.
2150.0

2100.0

2050.0

0

>

LU 2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 3

Liii Original Survey 1995 Survey]

L

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

0

0

0 200 400 600 800

Distance From Station IC Looking Downstream (feet)

1000 1200

Figure 5. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 3.
2150.0

2100.0

2050.0

0

0

4.1

t., (

LU 2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 4

[--OginalSurvey1995Survey]

I' /

I,.

I'

__ ___ __ L

'

_

/I

III,I,I,

II

I

- -

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Distance From Station 2 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 6. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 4.
2200.0

2150.0

2100.0

.4-.

0

2050.0

0

'U

2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 5

- - - Original Survey 1995 Survey

Tl II iiiI

0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Distance From Station 4A Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 7. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 5.

4000 4500
2200.0

2150.0

2100.0

0

.2 2050.0

2000.0

1950.0

1900.0

0 500 1000 1500

Distance From Station 5 Looking Downstream (feet)

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 6

a a

11711

_

2000 2500

Figure 8. Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 6.
2200.0

2150.0

2100.0

4-.

2050.0

0

Ui

2000.0

1950.0

1900,0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 7

I - - -

Origina' Survey 1995 survejl

11 J/iI

II,, a

0

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Distance From Station 6 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 9. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 7.
2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

2060.0

0

2040.0

0

UJ 2020,0

2000.0

1980.0

1960.Q

1940.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 8

---ongin survey

' F

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Distance From Station 6A Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 10. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 8.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 9

- - - Original Survey 1995_Surv

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

43

2060.0

Ui 2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

1960.0

I

-

I.

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Distance From Station 8 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 11. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 9.

12000

t I I
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

4..

2080.0

C0

> 2060. 0

2040.0

2020.0

2000,0

1980.0

0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 10

9riginaI Survey 1995]

-__

____ __ ___

I

I

I

-- - - - - 0

10) 2000 3000 4000 5000

Distance From Station 9A Looking Downstream (feet)

00t)

Figure 12. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 10.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 11

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

4.1

2080.0

0

.4.'

2060.0

LU

2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

/

Ii iiIi:IIi: 1 1 _ ___ 1 1111

J i"

I i

;

iii ;iII" i

;

T - : f

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Distance From Station 10 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 13. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 11.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

w

2080.0

0

c •.

2060.0

Ui

2040,0

2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 12

- - - Otiginal Survey

I '

TT

--- -------------- -------------- -------------- --- ------

a - _

---- ---------

_

a

------

-

-.--

__

- • a F

---------------,----_-

_ _ _

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Distance From Station 18 Looking Downstream (feet)

8000 9000 10000

Figure 14. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 12.
2160.0

2000.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 13

- - - Original Survey 1995 Survey

_ T 1ii:Iz

I

__ :

I'

I

________ __________ - -

0

0

0

_______ _______ ____ _______ _______

0

- -

____

- - _--,-- _0 -

_____

--

_______ ___

0

- --

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

[11

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

Distance From Station 20 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 15. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 13.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

C

0

cJ >

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 14

[

- - Original Survey 1995 Survi]

V

_ __

- - -

'

-

___________ •: r ___________ __________

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Distance From Station 22 Looking Downstream (feet)

8000 9000

Figure 16. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 14.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

C

0

C•) >

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 15

1--orgnai Survey 1995 survey]

-

0 0 - -

U

'---- _l____________ ____

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Distance From Station 24 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 17. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 15.

8000 9000
2140,0

2130.0

2120.0

2110.0

2100.0

w

2090.0

Ui 2080.0

2070.0

2060.0

2050.0

2040.0

0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 16

- Ongin Survey 1995 SurveyJ

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

1stance From Station 25 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 18. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 16.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 17

[-originalsurvey1995surveY

2160.0

2150.0

2140.0

2130.0

2120.0

0

. 2110.0

0

2100.0 C,

Ui

2090.0

2080.0

2070.0

2060.0

2050.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Distance From Station 26 LookIng Downstream (feet)

Figure 19. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 17,

ii ii11 I±T I II

_

__

- - - -

-

_- __ -

-

-

-_------. - _ -

a

• - - -

S

4000 4500
1

2200.0

2180.0

2160.0

2140.0

0

.D

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

2060.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 18

- - -OnginalSurvey 1995 Survey 1

T 1TTI EI I r • - • • • - • • •

I - - - • -

- . -

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Distance From Station 27 Looking Downstream (feet)

5000 6000

Figure 20. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 18.
2260.0

2240.0

2220.0

2200.0

w

2 2180.0

0

°

2160.0

LU

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Distance From Station 31 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 21. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 19.

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 19

[--OriginaI Survey 1995 Survey

" F

-

a a

• •

a - - -

S S S

• - _

7000 8000
2240.0

2220.0

2200.0

2180.0

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 20

"OnnSurvey 1995iey

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Distance From Station 32D Looking Downstream (feet)

7000 8000

Figure 22. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 20.
2220.0

2200.0

2180.0

4-a)

2160.0

a)

LU

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 21

[____Original Survey 1995_survey]

__- L

I

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Distance From Station 32E Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 23. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 21.

5000 6000
2280.0

2260.0

2240.0

2220.0

a)

2200.0

0

2180.0

w

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 22

Iii liii

__ - - -

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 2000

Distance From Station 32F Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 24. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 22.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 23

Li- - Original Survey 1995 Surv1

2160,0

2150.0

2140.0

2130.0

_ ii _ __

HH H I '

_

2230.0

2220.0

2210.0

2200.0

2190.0

w

2180.0

W 2170.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

Distance From Station 32F Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 25. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 23.
2200

2190

2180

2170

0

2160

2150

2140

2130

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 24

-1995 Survey IJ

Ilillil LI Il J___I

\j Note: Original Survey did not

contain this range line.

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Distance From Station 32J Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 26. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 24.
2150.0

2100.0

2050.0

0

C

0

0

Ui 2000.0

1950.0

-

1900.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 30

- Original Survey 1995 Survey

'I '

-

a

a - - - -

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Distance From Station 56 Looking Downstream (feet)

5000 6000

Figure 27. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 30.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 31

1

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

4-

2060.0

0

2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

1960.0

1940.0

0

1 IiIuII jI 1111±1 11 iii

4P-- - -L

-

-

-:

-

a - S a

-

a - -

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 O000

Dstance From Station 58C Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 28. - Theodore Roosev&t Reservoir ground profile for range line 31.
2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

Ui 2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

1960.0

1940.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 32

Original Survey

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Distance From Station 58B Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 29. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 32.

12000
4

2140.0

2120.0

2100,0

2080.0

4-

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

1980.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 33

---Original Survey 1995 Survey

_

__

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 190

Distance From Station 60 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 30. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 33.
2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

2080.0

C

0

cji

0 >

2 2060.0 LU

2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 34

survey

___

1 995 survey

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Distance From Station 63 Looking Downstream (feet)

7000 8000

Figure 31. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 34.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

-

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake

-Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 35

Survey ___ 1995 Survey 1

c1 ::' :: H I

--

p

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Distance From Station 65 LookIng Downstream (feet)

4500 5000

Figure 32. - Theodore Roosevett Reservoir ground profile for range line 35.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

4-a)

2100.0

4-

a,

U.'

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 36

[i-Oginaurvey 1995 Suy

11±171

0 1 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Distance From Station 68 LookIng Downstream (feet)

Figure 33. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 36.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

a)

2100.0

Ui

2080.0

2060.0

2040.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 37

- - Original Survey 1995 Surveys

-ø---J__ - --

-

I

a -

a _ - -

_________ ______-----

- -

a •

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Distance From Station 69 Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 34. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 37.
2160.0

2150.0

2140.0

2130.0

0

2120.0

C

0

2110. 0

U.'

2100.0

2090.0

2080.0

070.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 38

[--- Origin Survey 1995 Survey

EllilT III :L__

-

- - - -

- - S S -

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Distance From Station 70 LookIng Downstream (feet)

Figure 35. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 38.

- I
2150.0

2140.0

2130.0

j

2120.0

2 2110.0

LU

2100,0

2090.0

2080.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 39

L-__- Ogmnuy 1995 SUrVeY]

I

/

lit I /

I /

I

I

t I,I'

__ ___ __ __ __ ____ II __

I'

I

II

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Distance From Station 71B Looking Downstream (feet)

3500 4000

Figure 36. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 39.
2140.0

2135.0

2130.0

2125.0

2120.0

2115.0

C3 >

ILl 2110.0

2105.0

2100.0

2095.0

2090.0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Distance From Station 71B Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 37. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 40.

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 40

- Original Survey 1995 Survey

l. .' -

3500 4000
2170.0

2160.0

2150.0

2140.0

0

2130.0

2120.0

2110.0

2100.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 41

Lia1 Survey 1995 Survey

I I

lIt 1 111

0 500

Distance From Station 72 Looking Downstream (feet)

1000 1500 2000_2500

Figure 38. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 41.
2190.0

2180.0

2170.0

2160.0

0

2150.0

2140.0

2130.0

2120.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 42

- - - Original Survey

______

1995 Survey

* 1

*

ii

•

I

I II

I I

I

- -- - -

__________

-

__________

- '

__________ ) ____

-

: -

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Distance From Station 72B Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 39. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 42.
2230

2220

2210

2200

2190

c1

w

2180

2170

2160

2150

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 43

-i9gSSurveyl

Note: Original Survey did not --

contain this range line.

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Distance From Station 72J Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 40. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 43.
2170

2160

2150

2140

C

2130

2120

W 2110

2100

2090

2080

2070

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Distance From Left Bank Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 41. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 50.

-

r

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 50

[---original Survey 1995 Survey

_ )1H

____ ___ __ Right Bank _____

Station 79A

• • • ^__ .* ^

_J2500
2150

2140

2130

2120

Ui

2110

2100

2090

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 60

-1995 survey J

Note: Original Survey did not

contain this range line.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Distance From Station 66D Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 42. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 60.
2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

2100.0

a,

a,

.4-

2080.0

Ui

2060.0

2040.0

2020.0

2000.0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 70

- - - Original Survey 1995 Survey

____

I__ _ _ _ _ III

- -___.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Distance From Station 45C Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 43. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 70.

800 900 1000

r
C)

2200.0

2180.0

2160.0

2140.0

2120.0

II

2100.0

2080,0

2060.0

2040.0

0

Theodore Roosevelt Lake -Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 71

---originai Survey 1995_SuryI

-______ -____

111

T ____________ 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Distance From Station 45E Looking Downstream (feet)

Figure 44. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 71.
Theodore Roosevelt Lake - Salt River Project

Ground Profile for Range Line 80

- - OrignaI Survey 1995 Survey

2190.0

2180.0

2170.0

2160.0

2150.0

IL

2140.0

2130.0

2120.0

2110.0

1000 1500 2000 2500

Distance From Station 30B Looking Downstream (feet)

US

I

_____ _______________ ________________ ________________ I -

________________

I

I

I

a a _ - -

- a - • •

- •

-

-

- - - a

_____________________________________________________

a S

0 500

Figure 45. - Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir ground profile for range line 80.

4
Thaiweg Profile for the Salt River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir

2150

2100

C,

0

>

C,

w

4)

2050

2000

24 23

22

120

_ _ _ _

- 11

1950

1900

70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000

Distance Upstream From Range Line 4 (feet)

Figure 46. - Thaiweg profile for the Salt River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir.
Thalweg Profile for the Tonto River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir

2150

2100

a)

0

'5

>

0)

Ui

C) 0)

(5

2050

2000

4

42

1950

1900

60000 50000 40000 30000 20000

Distance Upstream From Range Line 30 (feet)

Figure 47. - Thalweg profile for the Tonto River Arm of Theodore Roosevelt Reservoir.

10000 0
Mission

The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and

protect water and related resources in an environmentally and

economically sound manner in the interest of the American Public.