alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 685.305 Determining the date of a student's withdrawal. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a school must follow the procedures in § 668.22(b) or (c), as applicable, for determining the student's date of withdrawal.
( b ) For a student who does not return for the next scheduled term following a summer break, which includes any summer term(s) in which classes are offered but students are not generally required to attend, a school must follow the procedures in § 668.22(b) or (c), as applicable, for determining the student's date of withdrawal except that the school must determine the student's date of withdrawal no later than 30 days after the start of the next scheduled term.
( c ) The school must use the date determined under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section for the purpose of reporting to the Secretary the student's date of withdrawal and for determining when a refund or return of title IV, HEA program funds must be paid under § 685.306.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087 *et seq.*)
[64 FR 59044, Nov. 1, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 65841, Nov. 1, 2013]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES
#### § 463.125 What are the program-specific requirements in the Unified State Plan for the State Vocational Rehabilitation program authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act title IV?

The program specific-requirements for the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan are set forth in sec. 101(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. All submission requirements for the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan are in addition to the jointly developed strategic and operational content requirements prescribed by sec. 102(b) of WIOA.
§ 19.131 Changes in officers, directors, members, or managers. ( a ) *General.* If there is a change in the list of officers, directors, members or managers that the proprietor filed as required by § 19.93, the proprietor must: ( 1 ) File form TTB F 5110.25 Application for Operating Permit Under 26 U.S.C. 5171(d) or a letterhead notice to amend the operating permit;
( 2 ) Provide the name and address for each new officer, director, member or manager; and
( 3 ) Incorporate all changes submitted by letterhead notice in the next TTB F 5110.25 filed.
( b ) *Waiver.* The appropriate TTB officer may waive the requirement to amend the operating permit if the changes relate to corporate officers listed on the original or current permit who are no longer connected with the operations covered by the permit.
(26 U.S.C. 5171, 5172)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 420.81

 419.34

 417.84

 416.39

 414.93

 413.41

 411.91

 410.43

 409.05

 407.86

 406.72

 405.19

 403.68

 402.15

 400.77

 399.06

 397.91

 396.66

 395.32

 393.92

 392.40

 390.84

 389.03

 387.64

 386.42

 384.63

 382.65

 380.68

 378.68

 376.79

 697,887

 684,913

 671,769

 659,154

 646,543

 633,510

 620,747

 608,249

 596,681

 586,774

 577,340

 564,770

 552,466

 540,102

 529,040

 515,451

 506,387

 496,602

 486,192

 475,404

 463,793

 451,986

 438,430

 428,122

 419,150

 406,112

 391,867

 377,878

 363,866

 350,801

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,002

 8,021

 8,138

 8,211

 8,318

 8,148

 6,538

 7,133

 5,516

 2,148

 5,772

 7,289

 7,360

 7,479

 7,559

 7,283

 4,650

 4,715

 4,756

 4,776

 7,188

 7,342

 7,473

 4,674

 5,860

 6,799

 7,047

 6,804

 6,912

 7,093

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL August 31, 2009

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2009 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS -359,794 198,004 13,409 -210,086

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

-12,708

-12,974

-13,144

-12,615

-12,611

-13,033

-12,763

-12,498

-11,568

-9,907

-9,434

-12,570

-12,304

-12,364

-11,062

-13,589

-9,064

-9,785

-10,410

-10,788

-11,611

-11,807

-13,556

-10,308

-8,972

-13,038

-14,245

-13,989

-14,012

-13,065

 570

 533

 645

 464

 448

 439

 441

 458

 434

 441

 361

 366

 356

 361

 354

 351

 493

 217

 476

 480

 490

 489

 539

 529

 491

 452

 437

 426

 449

 419

-7,484

-8,878

-8,547

-8,680

-8,507

-8,688

-6,820

-7,494

-5,722

-2,624

-5,997

-7,599

-7,577

-7,743

-7,933

-8,633

-5,080

-4,831

-5,140

-5,235

-7,416

-7,791

-7,810

-5,187

-6,258

-7,292

-7,352

-7,031

-7,234

-7,503

ELEV STORAGE

 0

 203,372

 194,494

 185,947

 177,267

 168,760

 160,072

 153,252

 145,758

 140,036

 137,412

 131,415

 123,816

 116,239

 108,496

 100,563

 91,930

 86,850

 82,019

 76,879

 71,644

 64,228

 56,437

 48,627

 43,440

 37,182

 29,890

 22,538

 15,507

 8,273

 770

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 210,856

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
§ 655.3 What regulations apply to the International Education Programs? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68757 , Aug. 27, 2024.
The following regulations apply to the International Education Programs: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities), except that part 79 does not apply to 34 CFR parts 660, 669, and 671.
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
( b ) The regulations in this part 655; and
( c ) As appropriate, the regulations in— ( 1 ) 34 CFR part 656 (National Resource Centers Program for Foreign Language and Area Studies or Foreign Language and International Studies);
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 657 (Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships Program);
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 658 (Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Program);
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 660 (International Research and Studies Program);
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 661 (Business and International Education Program); and
( 6 ) 34 CFR part 669 (Language Resource Centers Program).
( d ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1121-1127; 1221e-3)
[47 FR 14116, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 58 FR 32575, June 10, 1993; 64 FR 7739, Feb. 16, 1999; 79 FR 76104, Dec. 19, 2014]
(No. 73—CC—150

#### Richard R. Doyle, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

Richard R. Doyle, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §2076. Advances in foreign countries

Section 3648 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 529b) 1 shall not apply to payments made for the Bureau of Customs 2 in foreign countries.

(Mar. 28, 1938, ch. 55, 52 Stat. 126.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3648 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was classified to section 529 (not 529b) of former Title 31, Money and Finance, and subsequently repealed and restated as section 3324(a), (b) of Title 31 by Pub. L. 97–258, §§1, 5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 950, 1068.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 529b of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

#### Similar Provisions

Section is from Treasury Department Appropriation Act, 1939. Similar provisions were contained in the following appropriation acts:

May 6, 1939, ch. 115, title I, §1, 53 Stat. 660.

May 14, 1937, ch. 180, title I, 50 Stat. 142.

June 23, 1936, ch. 725, 49 Stat. 1832.

May 14, 1935, ch. 110, 49 Stat. 222.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Change of Name

The Bureau of Customs was redesignated the United States Customs Service by Treasury Department Order 165–23, Apr. 4, 1973, eff. Aug. 1, 1973, 38 F.R. 13037. See, also, section 308 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Treasury, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Treasury, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 1281, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 See Change of Name note below.
#### Bernard J. Carr, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, Merrell, J., taking no part, and McLennan, P. J., having *942been present at the argument of said appeal, but having died on the 8th day of May, 1913, without having taken any part in the determination of said appeal.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-59161, No. 33-62897, No. 333-59009, No.333-121638 and No. 333-122316), Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-122317) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-59783, No. 33-48770, No. 33-13292, No. 33-32504, No. 333-06977, No. 333-06989, No. 333-78429, No. 333-62382and No. 333-88476) of Ryerson Tull, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 21, 2005
§ 602.19 Monitoring and reevaluation of accredited institutions and programs. ( a ) The agency must reevaluate, at regularly established intervals, the institutions or programs it has accredited or preaccredited.
( b ) The agency must demonstrate it has, and effectively applies, monitoring and evaluation approaches that enable the agency to identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards and that take into account institutional or program strengths and stability. These approaches must include periodic reports, and collection and analysis of key data and indicators, identified by the agency, including, but not limited to, fiscal information and measures of student achievement, consistent with the provisions of § 602.16(g). This provision does not require institutions or programs to provide annual reports on each specific accreditation criterion.
( c ) Each agency must monitor overall growth of the institutions or programs it accredits and, at least annually, collect head-count enrollment data from those institutions or programs.
( d ) Institutional accrediting agencies must monitor the growth of programs at institutions experiencing significant enrollment growth, as reasonably defined by the agency.
( e ) Any agency that has notified the Secretary of a change in its scope in accordance with § 602.27(a) must monitor the headcount enrollment of each institution it has accredited that offers distance education or correspondence courses. The Secretary will require a review, at the next meeting of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, of any change in scope undertaken by an agency if the enrollment of an institution that offers distance education or correspondence courses that is accredited by such agency increases by 50 percent or more within any one institutional fiscal year. If any such institution has experienced an increase in head-count enrollment of 50 percent or more within one institutional fiscal year, the agency must report that information to the Secretary within 30 days of acquiring such data.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)
[84 FR 58921, Nov. 1, 2019]
Joseph D. Barbera 14706 NE Erickson Dr. La Center, WA 98629 Tel: 360 263 5359 

# RECEIVED OCT 022014 

## HEARING DOCKET

United States Department ofTransportation Office of Hearings

Washington, DC In the Matter of: Joseph D. Barbera FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 FDMS No. FAA 2013-1083 Judge Richard Goodwin


### Response to Complaintant's MotionstoStrike Responseto Motionfor SummaryJudgementand Reponse to 

### Respondent's MotiontoCompel Discovery(dated 12 June 2014) 

### A) Motion to 

### Strike Response as Untimely B) Motionto Extend Discovery Deadline
Response to Motion A There is no new information presented by the Complainant. There is nothing new for me to add. Response to Motion B 

### It is my desire to move to the hearing as quickly and efficiently as possible. Ifthe facts are as black and white as the Complainant suggests, then we should be able to proceed immediately. d, 25 September, 2014

Jose 

### 1Service List Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building
- Suite 2W1000 800 Independence Ave. SW Washington D.C. 20591 David Shayne, 

### Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., SW Renton/ WA 98057 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin/ 

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office of Hearings, M-20 US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington/ DC 20590



### 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 196

 178

 191

 180

 164

 181

 167

 169

 170

 173

 164

 187

 216

 219

 186

 152

 170

 144

 137

 140

 142

 153

 150

 163

 157

 155

 158

 155

 143

 157

 159

 156

 154

 152

 158

 158

 158

 156

 144

 161

 162

 173

 178

 143

 120

 119

 106

 105

 114

 123

 130

 136

 129

 128

 131

 128

 117

 110

 167

 168

 170

 163

 157

 163

 161

 162

 160

 161

 162

 171

 184

 189

 163

 141

 137

 128

 119

 125

 131

 140

 143

 154

 143

 141

 142

 129

 122

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,855

 3,476

 3,173

 2,923

 2,753

 2,595

 2,476

 2,399

 2,343

 2,301

 2,284

 2,291

 2,320

 2,338

 2,334

 2,307

 2,274

 2,239

 2,201

 2,163

 2,133

 2,111

 2,094

 2,087

 2,068

 2,038

 1,996

 1,936

 1,895

 275

 248

 227

 209

 197

 185

 177

 171

 167

 164

 163

 164

 166

 167

 167

 165

 162

 160

 157

 155

 152

 151

 150

 149

 148

 146

 143

 138

 135

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  September  30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the "Report"), I, Lizabeth M. Wolfson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/  Lizabeth M. Wolfson
_______________________
Chief Financial Officer
December 28,  2007





<PAGE>
#### George K. McLeod, Appellant, v. Alfred J. Pritchard, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 19.154 Bond guaranteed by deposit of securities or cash (including cash equivalents). ( a ) *Bond guaranteed by deposit of securities* — ( 1 ) *General.* As an alternative to the corporate surety bond under § 19.153, a person can file a bond that guarantees payment of the liability by pledging one or more acceptable negotiable securities. These securities must have a par value (face amount) equal to or greater than the penal sums of the required bonds. The pledged securities are held in the Federal Reserve Bank in a safekeeping account with TTB as the pledgee. Should the proprietor fail to pay one or more of the guaranteed liabilities, TTB can take action to sell the deposited securities to satisfy the debt. Pledged securities will be released if there are no outstanding liabilities when the bond is terminated. (See § 19.170.)
( 2 ) *Acceptable securities.* Only public debt obligations of the United States, the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States Government, are acceptable for the purpose described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The Department of the Treasury and certain other United States Government agencies issue debt instruments that are acceptable as collateral, such as Treasury notes and Treasury bills. Savings bonds, certificates of deposit and letters of credit are not acceptable. A list of securities acceptable as collateral in lieu of surety bonds is available from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Current information and guidance from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service Web site may be found at *https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov .*
( b ) *Bond guaranteed by deposit of cash or cash equivalent.* As an alternative to the corporate surety bond under § 19.153, a person can file a bond that guarantees payment of the liability by submitting cash or its equivalent (including a money order, cashier's check, or personal check). Cash or its equivalent must be no less than the penal sums of the required bond. Cash equivalents must be payable to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. A bond described in this paragraph will be released if there are no outstanding liabilities when the bond is terminated. (See § 19.170.)
(31 U.S.C. 9301, 9303; 31 CFR part 380)
[T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1120, Jan. 4, 2017]
§ 19.153 Bond guaranteed by a corporate surety. ( a ) *Corporate surety.* A company that issues bonds is called a “corporate surety.” Proprietors must obtain the surety bonds required by this subpart from a corporate surety approved by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) *How to find an approved surety.* The Department of the Treasury publishes a list of approved corporate surety companies in Treasury Department Circular 570, Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies. Treasury Department Circular 570 is published in the Federal Register annually on the first business day in July, and supplemental changes are published periodically thereafter. The most recent circular and any supplemental changes to it may be viewed on the Bureau of the Fiscal Service Web site at *https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570.htm .*
(31 U.S.C. 9304, 9306)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1120, Jan. 4, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,901

 4,547

 4,647

 3,692

 3,770

 3,151

 4,184

 5,278

 4,377

 4,108

 4,311

 4,088

 3,896

 4,033

 3,377

 3,553

 3,510

 2,319

 3,900

 3,655

 4,809

 3,007

 4,925

 5,873

 6,968

 4,792

 5,506

 3,315

 4,004

 4,245

 331

 563

 543

 312

 414

 409

 413

 471

 643

 248

 352

 446

 405

 259

 420

 381

 537

 505

 435

 530

 501

 532

 465

 540

 536

 514

 425

 426

 464

 510

 2,217

 2,363

 2,087

 1,651

 1,646

 1,446

 1,530

 2,146

 2,214

 1,669

 1,573

 1,818

 1,688

 1,997

 1,516

 1,638

 1,312

 1,091

 1,362

 1,728

 1,836

 1,166

 1,728

 2,343

 2,863

 2,548

 2,098

 1,938

 2,169

 2,166

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 37,911

 38,248

 38,819

 38,567

 37,699

 37,038

 36,322

 36,068

 35,535

 34,218

 32,221

 29,124

 26,587

 26,045

 25,344

 24,619

 23,844

 23,284

 23,000

 23,282

 23,588

 22,608

 22,122

 22,796

 24,086

 24,816

 25,226

 25,167

 25,820

 26,348

 2,708

 2,732

 2,773

 2,755

 2,693

 2,646

 2,594

 2,576

 2,538

 2,444

 2,302

 2,080

 1,899

 1,860

 1,810

 1,759

 1,703

 1,663

 1,643

 1,663

 1,685

 1,615

 1,580

 1,628

 1,720

 1,773

 1,802

 1,798

 1,844

 1,882

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Ryerson Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Terence R. Rogers, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Terence R. Rogers                                
|Terence R. Rogers                                    
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 31, 2010