alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Boschert, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          



| | By:    | /s/ John Boschert                                
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                  
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT                                    
| |        |                                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial   
| |        | Officer, President, Secretary and
      Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and                 
| |        | Principal Financial Officer)                     
| |        |                                                  
| | Date:  | May 15, 2007                                     



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 12.2 Territorial extent.

This part applies to the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
#### § 99.4 What are the rights of parents?

An educational agency or institution shall give full rights under the Act to either parent, unless the agency or institution has been provided with evidence that there is a court order, State statute, or legally binding document relating to such matters as divorce, separation, or custody that specifically revokes these rights.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g)
§ 76.125 What is the purpose of these regulations? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70335 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Sections 76.125 through 76.137 of this part contain requirements for the submission of an application by an Insular Area for the consolidation of two or more grants under the programs described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) For the purpose of §§ 76.125-76.137 of this part the term *Insular Area* means the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
( c ) The Secretary may make an annual consolidated grant to assist an Insular Area in carrying out one or more State-administered formula grant programs of the Department.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[47 FR 17421, Apr. 22, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 21776, May 19, 1989; 57 FR 30341, July 8, 1992]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, 

LIBERTY MUTUTAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

NAVIGATORS INSURANCE 

COMPANY, RSUI INDEMNITY 

COMPANY, and BERKLEY 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs Below,

Appellants,

v.

DAVID H. MURDOCK, C. 

MICHAEL CARTER, DOLE FOOD 

COMPANY, INC. and DFC 

HOLDINGS, LLC,

Defendants Below,

Appellees.

§

§ 

§ No. 32, 2017

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court of

§ the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N16C-01-104

§ 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: January 23, 2017

Decided: February 2, 2017

Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 2

nd day of February 2017, having considered the notice and 

supplemental notice of appeal from an interlocutory order under Supreme Court 

Rule 42, it appears to the Court that:
2

(1) On April 8, 2016, the plaintiffs below-appellants, Arch Insurance 

Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Insurance 

Company, Navigators Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company, and 

Berkley Insurance Company (“Insurers”) filed an amended complaint against the 

defendants below-appellees, David H. Murdock, C. Michael Carter, Dole Food 

Company, Inc., and DFC Holdings, LLC. The Insurers sought: (i) a declaratory 

judgment that they did not have to fund the defense or settlement of a consolidated 

class action in the Court of Chancery (Count I); and (ii) a declaratory judgment 

that they were entitled to subrogation pursuant to a fraud exclusion provision in the 

relevant insurance policies and applicable law (Count II). Murdock, Carter, and 

Dole filed a motion to dismiss. In an opinion dated December 21, 2016, the 

Superior Court denied the motion to dismiss as to Count I, but granted the motion 

to dismiss as to Count II.

1

(2) On January 3, 2017, the Insurers filed an application for certification 

to take an interlocutory appeal. Murdock, Carter, and Dole opposed the 

application. By order dated January 20, 2017, the Superior Court denied the 

application after determining certification was not warranted under the principles 

and criteria of Rule 42(b). 

 

1

Arch Ins. Co, v. Murdock, 2016 WL 7414218 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 21, 2016). 
3

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 

discretion of the Court.2 In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 

that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for 

certification under Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 

appeal is REFUSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice

 

 

2

Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 451 283 338 225

2 463 290 344 229

3 0 0 0 16

4 0 0 0 16

5 375 237 289 195

6 525 272 359 238

7 516 277 366 242

8 546 332 420 276

9 603 296 380 251

10 0 0 0 16

11 586 226 353 234

12 559 250 384 253

13 520 280 377 249

14 422 276 314 210

15 428 247 298 200

16 433 258 312 209

17 416 248 298 200

18 424 259 305 204

19 418 254 307 206

20 399 263 312 209

21 419 269 305 204

22 377 264 303 203

23 381 262 309 207

24 375 259 308 206

25 414 263 318 213

26 569 344 438 287

27 732 416 507 329

28 711 362 455 297

Total 8699

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
(April 30, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of Frank Valenti, Appellant, against Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 Chief
        Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
        on  Form
        10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities  and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Kirk N. Blackim,  Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the  best
        of
        my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date
                  December 14, 2006
              /s/Kirk
                  N. BlackimKirk
                  N. BlackimPresident
                  and Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 619

 574

 558

 558

 529

 608

 614

 612

 624

 563

 645

 679

 594

 617

 640

 576

 535

 536

 568

 560

 593

 609

 613

 591

 598

 635

 631

 597

 732

 810

 749

 455

 447

 457

 459

 460

 508

 482

 468

 463

 460

 457

 479

 476

 478

 452

 428

 430

 435

 454

 458

 473

 463

 450

 438

 420

 418

 435

 422

 430

 400

 403

 521

 498

 505

 507

 501

 549

 553

 530

 518

 504

 535

 552

 532

 546

 523

 480

 477

 487

 504

 505

 533

 543

 523

 498

 464

 470

 477

 494

 551

 538

 530

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 4, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 338

 324

 328

 329

 326

 355

 358

 344

 336

 327

 347

 357

 345

 353

 339

 313

 311

 317

 327

 328

 345

 352

 339

 324

 303

 306

 311

 321

 357

 348

 344

TOTAL 15,948

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### §64. Sale or disposal of timber; destruction of detrimental animal or plant life

Nothing in sections 57, 58, and 60 to 65 of this title shall be construed as repealing or in any way modifying the authority granted the Secretary of the Interior by said section 3 of the said Act approved August 25, 1916,1 to sell or dispose of timber in national parks in those cases where, in his judgment, the cutting of such timber is required in order to control the attacks of insects or diseases or otherwise conserve the scenery of the natural or historic objects in such parks and to provide for the destruction of such animals and such palnt 2 life as may be detrimental to the use of any of said parks, or the authority granted to said Secretary by sections 51 to 54 of this title.

(June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §5, 41 Stat. 732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Said section 3 of the said Act approved August 25, 1916, referred to in text, is section 3 of act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, which enacted section 3 of this title. Section 3 of the Act was repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. Probably should be "plant".
EXHIBIT 32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc.(the Registrant), I, Xiaojing Yu, hereby certify that:  1.  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: April 24, 2007  By:  /s/ Xiaojing Yu Xiaojing Yu
Chief Executive Officer
§ 84.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.
(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
#### Jay Paul SHELTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15481.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 10, 1955.

J. Paul Shelton, Atlanta, Ga., in pro. per.

Prim B. Smith, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Jack C. Benjamin, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., George R. Blue U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTEN-BERRY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Brought by appellant who is presently confined in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, under a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon him in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, this is an attempted appeal from an order entered in the sentencing court on Dec. 21, 1954. This order, reciting:

> “On October 22, 1952, defendant filed a pleading styled ‘Election Not to Serve Sentence’, which pleading was not acted upon by the Court. And it further appearing that on December 15, 1954, defendant filed a motion styled ‘Motion to Nullify Election Not to Serve Sentence’. It Is Ordered that the defendant’s ‘Motion to Nullify Election Not to Serve Sentence’ be denied for the reason that it presents no basis for action by this Court at this time.”

is in form and in fact not a final order from which an appeal will lie, but interlocutory and non-appealable. The appeal must, therefore be, and it is hereby Dismissed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92705 / August 18, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20171

In the Matter of

Robinhood Financial, LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On June 4, 2021, the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, published 

a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1pursuant to 

Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s 

Rules”),

2

and simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”). 

The Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from 

the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Noel Gittens, United 

States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5876. 

The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit 

their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received onehundred twenty-three (123) comments during the comment period for the Proposed Plan. On 

August 6, 2021, after thorough review and substantial consideration of the comments, the 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 92115 (June 4, 2021).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order approving the 

Proposed Plan without modification,3and posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”). 

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accrued interest and earnings 

thereon, less a Reserve, (“Net Available Fair Fund”) to Eligible Investors according to the 

methodology set forth in the Plan. 

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has compiled the payee information and 

prepared a payment file in a Commission-approved format. The Commission staff has reviewed 

and accepted the payment file and requests, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s 

Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6), that the Commission authorize the transfer of $25,673,783.30

from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington National Bank for 

distribution by the Fund Administrator to the eligible investors in accordance with the Plan. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall transfer 

$25,673,783.30 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington 

National Bank, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to the eligible investors

in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 92591 (Aug. 6, 2021).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
#### Alfred R. Dufrene, appellee, v. David D. Smeaton et al., appellants.

Filed October 5, 1899.

No. 8,976.

1. Appeal: Time to File Transcript: Jurisdiction. To confer jurisdiction upon this court to review a cause on appeal a transcript of the judgment or final order must be filed with the cleric of this court within six months from the entry in the district court of such judgment or final order.

2.-: -: -: Consent oe Parties. Consent of parties can not confer jurisdiction of the subject-matter.

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Powell, J.

*Dismissed.*

Gregory, *Day & Day,*for appellants.

*Dexter L. Thomas*and *Boxcard B. Smith, contra.*

Norval, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a final order rendered by the court below on June 25,1896. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since no transcript was filed in this court until. December 26, 1896, which was more than six months after the entry of the final order sought to be reviewed. See *Verges v. Roush,*1 Nebr., 113; *Glore v. Hare,*4 Nebr., 131; *Horn v. Miller,*20 Nebr., 98; *Chapman v. Allen,*33 Nebr., 129; *Withnell v. City of Omaha,*37 Nebr., 621. The filing of a transcript of the judgment or final order in the appellate court within the time prescribed by statute is a jurisdictional matter which can not be waived by the parties.

Dismissed.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

April-06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Apr-06 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 2,904 1,019 3,923 5,761 2,021 7,782 0.0 

2-Apr-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 2,372 979 3,351 4,705 1,942 6,647 0.0 

3-Apr-06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1,934 1,022 2,957 3,837 2,028 5,865 0.0 

4-Apr-06 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1,593 1,023 2,616 3,160 2,029 5,189 1.9 

5-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 495 1,029 1,525 982 2,042 3,024 0.0 

6-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 1,027 1,527 991 2,037 3,028 0.0 

7-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,274 1,028 2,302 2,527 2,040 4,567 0.0 

8-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,977 952 2,929 3,922 1,888 5,810 0.0 

9-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,975 911 2,885 3,917 1,806 5,723 0.0 

10-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,966 888 2,855 3,900 1,762 5,662 0.0 

11-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,929 864 2,793 3,826 1,714 5,540 0.0 

12-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,822 869 2,690 3,613 1,723 5,336 0.0 

13-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,036 875 2,911 4,038 1,736 5,774 0.0 

14-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,314 249 1,562 2,606 493 3,099 0.0 

15-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 0 137 137 #DIV/0! 

16-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 1 5,295 0 5,295 10,503 0 10,503 0.0 17-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1,952 434 2,386 3,872 860 4,732 0.0 

18-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1,958 180 2,138 3,884 357 4,241 0.0 

19-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2,785 0 2,785 5,525 0 5,525 0.0 

20-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 2,707 0 2,707 5,369 0 5,369 0.0 

21-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 5,426 333 5,759 10,763 660 11,423 0.0 22-Apr-06 6 0 6 0 9 0 9 3 5,976 0 5,976 11,854 0 11,854 0.5 23-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 4 6,685 0 6,685 13,260 0 13,260 0.0 24-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 4 3,504 647 4,151 6,950 1,284 8,234 0.0 

25-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3,712 1,471 5,183 7,363 2,918 10,281 0.0 26-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2,457 1,712 4,169 4,873 3,396 8,269 0.0 

27-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2,461 1,716 4,177 4,882 3,404 8,286 0.0 

28-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3,841 1,719 5,560 7,618 3,410 11,028 0.0 

29-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 5 4,400 1,720 6,120 8,727 3,412 12,139 0.0 30-Apr-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4,400 1,706 6,106 8,727 3,384 12,111 0.0 

Total 12 0 12 XXXX 66 0 66 XXXX 81,651 24,443 106,094 161,955 48,483 210,438 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for April = 1,100

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta 

Daily D

Tracy Combined SWP
#### James K. Bramer, Appellant, v. William F. Lansing and Frederick G. Teall, as Executors, etc., of Rollin H. Smith, Deceased, Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Interlocutory and final judgments affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
---

Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Actionview International,
  Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-/kQSB for the
  year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  (the Report), I, Christopher Stringer, President and Chief Financial
  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ *Christopher Stringer*           
|-------------------------------------
|Christopher Stringer                 
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: March 30, 2006                

---