alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Cause No. DA 23 -0594

__________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF A.J.K., J.S.K., M.S.K. and R.A. - H. K., Youths in Need of Care .

_________________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant Mother’s motion for extension of time and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDER ED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 8, 2024, to file and serve the opening brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023
THE Newspaper of the Central Coast 

TRIBUNE 

3825 South Higuera • Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112 • (805) 781-7800 

In The Superior Court of The State of California 

In and for the County of San Luis Obispo 

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

AD# 7049089 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ss. 

County of San Luis Obispo 

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 

County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not 

interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at 

all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned 

was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of 

THE TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general Circulation, 

printed and published daily at the City of San Luis 

Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice 

at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was 

published in the above-named newspaper and not in any 

supplement thereof - on the following dates to wit; 

APRIL 27, 2014, that said newspaper was duly and 

regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of 

general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior 

Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on 

June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the Government Code 

of the State of California. 

I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

(Signatu 

DATED: 

~aw_

APRIL 

ofPnnc1pal 

27,2014 

t.Clerk) ~ 

AD COST: $95 .00 

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 

AIR ~OLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBLiC HEARING 

FOR DISTRICT RULE 222 

Notice is hereby given that the Air Poilu· 

lion Control Board- will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, May 28, 2014, at l):OO a.m. 1n the Board of Supervisor's Chambers in the County Government Center 

located at 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis 

Ob1spo, State of California, to consider 

rev1s1ons to the following item: 

Rule 222, Federal Emission Statement 

is proposed to implement the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 

182 (a)(3)(B)(i) in the eastern San Luis 

Obispo County Federal ozone non- attainment arEla. The CCA requires larger sources of ox1des of mtrogen and volatile 11 

organic compounds in nonattainment areas to report tlieir emissions. Rule 222 

is . an adm~ni~trative rule specifying submiSSion reqUirements of emiss1on state- ! 1 

ments. ·Rule 222 does not impose any I 

control requirements. 

Copies of the proposed rule and staff 

report Will be available for public review 

weekdays between 8:00 am-12 noon and 1 

1:00-5:00 pm at the District's office, 3433 

Roberto Court, San Luis Obispo. To be 

Incorporated into this hearing, written com- ments concerning Rule 222 should be 

received no later than May 27, 2014. All 

?e~e~~ons and comments may be submitLarry R. Allen, Air Pollution Control Officer 

San Luis Dbispo County Air Pollution 

Control District . 3433 Roberto Court 

San Luis Obispo, Cali(omia 93401 

(805) 781-5912 

April27, 2014 7049089 · 

RECEIVED 

APR 3 0 2014 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST 

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
#### Chicago Woolen Mills Company, Defendant in Error, v. Adams Express Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,310.

Express *companies—when XiabXe to consignor.*If goods are delivered to an express company for delivery to the consignee c. o. d. and within a reasonable time neither goods nor money is delivered to the consignor, the express company is liable.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank Crowe, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 6, 1911.

Rehearing denied January 17, 1911.

Charles B. Elder, for plaintiff in error.

David K. Cochrane, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the bill of exceptions to this case was presented to the court in apt time under the law, and that it is properly a part of the record.

Only two of the items enumerated in the plaintiff’s statement of claim are now involved—the shipment of *420goods to Will Crawley, Lakewood, Florida, and the shipment to J. McConnell & Son, Gate City, Virginia, for $10 as to which the defendant plaintiff in error makes no question.

The evidence tends to show that on October 20, 1905, the Chicago Woolen Mills at Chicago, Illinois, shipped one suit of clothes to Crawley at Lakewood, Florida, by the plaintiff in error with directions to deliver to him and collect $32, the value of the suit, and return the money to the defendant in error. The package and the receipt given by the Express Company were marked C. O. D. $32. The plaintiff in error did not return the goods or the money to the defendant in error in reasonable time. No inference can be drawn from the evidence that the goods were tendered to the consignee.

We think the evidence brings the case within the rule of A. M. U. Express Co. v. Wolf, 79 Ill. 430; and that there was a breach of the contract on the part of plaintiff in error and its duty thereunder for which the defendant in error is entitled to recover. Substantial justice was administered in the judgment of the trial court, and we therefore do not find it necessary to discuss the alleged errors in procedure under the provisions of the Municipal Court Act.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
§ 373.2 Who is eligible for assistance? ( a ) The following types of organizations are eligible for assistance under this program: ( 1 ) State vocational rehabilitation agencies.
( 2 ) Community rehabilitation programs.
( 3 ) Indian tribes or tribal organizations.
( 4 ) Other public or nonprofit agencies or organizations, including institutions of higher education.
( 5 ) For-profit organizations, if the Secretary considers them to be appropriate.
( 6 ) Consortia that meet the requirements of 34 CFR 75.128 and 75.129.
( 7 ) Other organizations identified by the Secretary and published in the Federal Register.
( b ) In competitions held under this program, the Secretary may limit competitions to one or more types of these organizations.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 303(b)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 773(b)(2))
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Ancona Mining Corporation** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Gerard Dab, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 17th day of November, 2004.

 
/s/ Gerard Dab 
Gerard Dab 
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LOTUS PACIFIC,INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 AND ARE QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      30,779,486               3,262,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,655,975               7,157,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,972,965                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,983,411              11,181,055
<PP&E>                                       3,104,090               1,710,509
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,235,567                 349,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             200,759,418              45,454,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,840,846               3,010,544
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          4                       4
<COMMON>                                        64,544                  47,387
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,000                  80,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               200,759,418             200,759,418
<SALES>                                     42,382,795               6,154,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,574,602               7,991,336
<CGS>                                       37,711,338               3,408,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,385,128              11,458,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,487                  46,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                  46,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,812,013)             (3,513,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                (80,714)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,812,013)             (3,432,510)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (643,658)                 565,916
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,047,071)             (2,648,865)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.20)                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)                  (0.06)



</TABLE>
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# 132 ) ll-E-9 2
Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07AM Sheet 132 of 264P. 2

MA R 0 4 '9 7 10:4 6 AMERICA NACRYLI C COR P 516422281 1 P- 1 

### •A-94-5 2 

## H E f ^

TO : COMPANY
LOCATION : ATTN : FAX : PHONE : DATE : PACIFI C ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES . INC . From : AMERICA

N ACRYLI C CORP . 40 0 SHEFFIEL D AVENU E RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK . N C WES T BABYLON . N Y1170 4 MELANI E PROCTOR (919 ) 941-023 4 (919 1 941-033 3 FAX : 516/422-281 1 PHONE : 516/422-220 0 Sen t By : TO M

ZIEGLE R MARC H 4 , 199 7 Add' l Pages :

Than k yo ufo r sendin g th e informatio nregardin g th e natur e o f you r task , o nbehal f o f th e EPA . I nreviewin g you r contac t summary , some detail s requir e clarification . A s I mentione ddurin g ou r conversation , th e ter m "SMC " i s a

nindustr y term referrin g t o a very

specifi c material . Th e materia l i s a moldin g compoun dincorporatin g glas s fiber , polyeste r (or vinylester ) resin , anda ver y

heav y loading o f inorgani c filler . Th e resul t i s shee t moldin g compoundi nwhic hth e resi ni s sufficientl y viscou s tha t i t i s essentiall y

a nimmobil e paste . Th e moldin g compound s tha t w e produc e a s a nintermediar y

i nou r compression-moldin g operatio nar e no t immobil e t o th e exten t tha t w e coul drol l the

m u p an dsen dthem t o anothe r processin g facility . Th e moldin g compound s tha t w e produc e ar e for ou r ow ninterna l us e only . Not e als o that , althoughw e d o proces s polyeste r resins , mos t o f th e resi ntha t w e proces s i s acrylic . Th e significanc e o f thi s i s that , whil e emission s fro

m our facilit y

includ e styrene , th e majo r portio n o f th e emission s fro

m ou r facilit y

i s methy l methacrylate . Thi s i s reflecte di nou r For

m R reportin g t o th e EPA . Als o not e that , compare dt o th e typica l large-volume producer s o f SMC , America nAcryli c Corporation' s throughpu t i s relativel y small . Ge t i ntouc hi f additiona l informatio ni s needed .



# L 

# mm • ]3<? ;
EPAAI P DOCKF T
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 546

 539

 537

 536

 561

 589

 638

 658

 704

 725

 720

 686

 695

 688

 638

 632

 614

 605

 596

 595

 606

 637

 648

 665

 678

 692

 713

 747

 755

 758

 764

 538

 534

 532

 532

 536

 562

 590

 641

 659

 702

 687

 676

 686

 637

 631

 614

 604

 594

 589

 589

 594

 609

 638

 643

 647

 667

 693

 707

 743

 741

 749

 542

 537

 534

 534

 547

 576

 616

 651

 691

 718

 706

 681

 692

 663

 635

 624

 610

 599

 593

 592

 599

 626

 643

 653

 664

 677

 704

 734

 750

 750

 756

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 351

 348

 346

 346

 354

 372

 397

 418

 443

 460

 452

 437

 444

 426

 408

 402

 393

 386

 382

 382

 386

 403

 413

 420

 426

 434

 451

 470

 480

 480

 483

TOTAL 19,897

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 104.32 Location and notification. A recipient that operates a public elementary or secondary education program or activity shall annually: ( a ) Undertake to identify and locate every qualified handicapped person residing in the recipient's jurisdiction who is not receiving a public education; and
( b ) Take appropriate steps to notify handicapped persons and their parents or guardians of the recipient's duty under this subpart.
[45 FR 30936, May 9, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 68054, Nov. 13, 2000]
#### § 99.61 What responsibility does an educational agency or institution, a recipient of Department funds, or a third party outside of an educational agency or institution have concerning conflict with State or local laws?

If an educational agency or institution determines that it cannot comply with the Act or this part due to a conflict with State or local law, it must notify the Office within 45 days, giving the text and citation of the conflicting law. If another recipient of Department funds under any program administered by the Secretary or a third party to which personally identifiable information from education records has been non-consensually disclosed determines that it cannot comply with the Act or this part due to a conflict with State or local law, it also must notify the Office within 45 days, giving the text and citation of the conflicting law.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(f))

[76 FR 75642, Dec. 2, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc.(the Registrant), I, Xiaojing Yu, hereby certify that:  1.  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: April 17, 2007  By:  /s/ Xiaojing Yu Xiaojing Yu
Chief Executive Officer
§ 75.60 Individuals ineligible to receive assistance. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70320 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) An individual is ineligible to receive a fellowship, scholarship, or discretionary grant funded by the Department if the individual— ( 1 ) Is not current in repaying a debt or is in default, as that term is used in 34 CFR part 668, on a debt— ( i ) Under a program listed in paragraph (b) of this section; or
( ii ) To the Federal Government under a nonprocurement transaction; and
( 2 ) Has not made satisfactory arrangements to repay the debt.
( b ) An individual who is not current in repaying a debt, or is in default, as that term is used in 34 CFR part 668, on a debt under a fellowship, scholarship, discretionary grant, or loan program, as included in the following list, and who has not made satisfactory arrangements to repay the debt, is ineligible under paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) A grant awarded under the Pell Grant (20 U.S.C. 1070a, *et seq.*), National Early Intervention Scholarship and Partnership (NEISP) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a-21, *et seq.*), Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG) (20 U.S.C. 1070b, *et seq.*), or State Student Incentive Grant (SSIG) (20 U.S.C. 1070c, *et seq.*) program, or a scholarship awarded under the Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program (20 U.S.C. 1070d-31, *et seq.*), a fellowship awarded under the Jacob K. Javits Fellows Program (20 U.S.C. 1134h-1134k), or a fellowship awarded under the Patricia Roberts Harris Fellowship Program (20 U.S.C. 1134d-1134f).
( 2 ) A fellowship awarded under the Christa McAuliffe Fellowship Program (20 U.S.C. 1113-1113e), the Bilingual Education Fellowship Program (20 U.S.C. 3221-3262), or the Rehabilitation Long-Term Training Program (29 U.S.C. 774(b)).
( 3 ) A loan made under the Perkins Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1087aa, *et seq.*), the Income Contingent Direct Loan Demonstration Project (20 U.S.C. 1087a, *et seq.*), the Stafford Loan Program, Supplemental Loans for Students (SLS), PLUS, or Consolidation Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1071, *et seq.*), or the Cuban Student Loan Program (22 U.S.C. 2601, *et seq.*).
( 4 ) A scholarship or repayment obligation incurred under the Paul Douglas Teacher Scholarship Program (20 U.S.C. 1111, *et seq.*).
( 5 ) A grant, or a loan, made under the Law Enforcement Education Program (42 U.S.C. 3775).
( 6 ) A stipend awarded under the Indian Fellowship Program (29 U.S.C. 774(b)).
( 7 ) A scholarship awarded under the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program (20 U.S.C. 1021 *et seq.*).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[57 FR 30337, July 8, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 24870, May 12, 1994; 65 FR 19609, Apr. 11, 2000]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KV/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIANO SOLIS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71619

Agency No. A070-938-176

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Emiliano Solis, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

FILED

MAR 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KV/Research 2 07-71619

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

adverse credibility findings, Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d 1085, 1088 (9th Cir. 2000), and

we review de novo constitutional issues, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d

1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

because Solis failed to produce his brother’s testimony at the hearing to

corroborate his claim, where his brother was the only witness to events forming the

basis of Solis’ claim and was available to testify, see Sidhu, 220 F.3d at 1090-91

(IJ could properly fault applicant for failing to produce critical corroborating

witness from nearby suburb), and Solis’ explanation does not compel a contrary

conclusion, see Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence

of credible testimony, Solis’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See

Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Solis’ CAT claim is based on testimony the agency found not

credible, and there is no evidence in the record that compels a finding that it is

more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to Mexico, his CAT claim

also fails. See id. at 1156-57. Solis’ contention that the agency did not apply the

correct standard to his CAT claim is not supported by the record.
KV/Research 3 07-71619

We reject Solis’ contention that the IJ’s pretermission of his cancellation of

removal claim violated due process. See Lata, 204 F.3d at 1246 (requiring error

for due process violation).

Solis’ contention that the qualifying relative requirement for cancellation of

removal violates equal protection is foreclosed by Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526

F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 7,709 1,326 4,983 66,609 4,758

2 6,593 1,325 4,096 66,135 4,724

3 6,279 865 2,890 63,831 4,559

4 5,266 752 2,776 61,157 4,368

5 5,598 1,006 3,102 58,388 4,171

6 6,637 1,717 3,661 57,371 4,098

7 6,743 1,571 4,114 57,025 4,073

8 8,219 1,521 4,429 57,024 4,073

9 7,197 1,226 3,930 56,594 4,042

10 5,786 546 3,016 55,304 3,950

11 6,437 473 3,188 53,936 3,853

12 6,497 689 3,515 52,860 3,776

13 6,160 741 3,132 51,372 3,669

14 5,774 718 3,239 50,071 3,577

15 5,993 501 3,194 48,282 3,449

16 5,756 650 3,235 47,421 3,387

17 5,910 533 3,585 48,116 3,437

18 6,575 917 3,570 48,910 3,494

19 6,732 1,486 3,765 49,573 3,541

20 7,411 1,677 4,166 50,078 3,577

21 8,062 1,334 4,609 50,573 3,612

22 9,463 1,021 5,251 51,395 3,671

23 9,984 2,271 5,918 53,383 3,813

24 10,419 1,023 6,032 56,399 4,029

25 10,517 994 6,346 59,557 4,254

26 11,283 1,436 6,705 62,747 4,482

27 11,279 2,069 7,025 66,640 4,760

28 10,976 1,919 7,127 70,528 5,038

29 9,438 1,858 6,169 73,503 5,250

30 8,140 941 5,684 75,952 5,425

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022