# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 13-737V

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* CHRISTINE SHEA, * * Filed: June 15, 2015 Petitioner, *
* v. * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Neurological SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Injury AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
* Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer , Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P. C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Ryan D. Pyles , U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Wa shington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On September 25, 2013, Christine Shea filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensati on Program (the “Vaccine Program”). 2 Petitioner alleges that she developed a neurological injury as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine that she received on October 13, 2010.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged in jury. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulat ion (filed June 15, 2015)
that the issues before them could be settle d, and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

1 Because this decision contains a reason ed explanation for my action in this cas e, it will be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. To do so, Vaccine Rule 18(b) provides that each party has fo urteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secr et or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or simila r files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the decision will be available to the public. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program comprise s Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 through 34 (2006)) [hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”]. Individual sectio ns references hereafter will be to § 300aa of the Act.2 I have reviewed the file, and based upon that re view, I conclude that th e parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonabl e. I therefore adopt it as my d ecision in awarding damages on the
terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

 A lump sum of $135,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

Stipulation ¶ 8. This amount represents compensa tion for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amounts set forth above to be made
to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for re view filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk
of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite en try of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.Case 1:13-vv-00737-UNJ Document 30 Filed 06/15/15 Page 5 of 5