alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In t he Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 24

- 00037

- CR

EX PARTE LUIS ANGEL MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

On Appeal from the County Court Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 10984CR

Before Stevens , C.J., van C leef and Ra mbin , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION This Court previously reversed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus and remanded the matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. 1 Ex p arte Hernandez , No. 06

- 23

- 002 0 7

- CR, 2023 WL 8422012 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Dec

. 5 , 2023, pet. filed) (mem. op., not designated for public ation). Before the issuance of our mandate, and while the State’s petition for discretionary review was pending bef o re the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the trial court issued another denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus, which
is the s ubject of this appeal. Recognizing that the trial court’s action prior to the issuance of our mandate was a nullity, T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (g) (“Once the record has been filed in the appellate court, all further proceedings in the trial court

— except as provided otherwise by law or by these rules

— will be suspended until the trial court receives the appellate

- court mandate. ” ), Appellant filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal , se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss
also states his de sire to “await a decision from the Court of Criminal Appeals before pursuing his claim again.”

1 Originally appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equaliz atio n ef fort s . See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 7 3.001 (Supp.).3

We vacate the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus issued on January 22 , 2024 , grant the appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal , and dismiss th is appeal.

Sc ott E. Steve n s Chief Justice Date Submitted: March 1 1 , 2024 Date Decided: March 1 2 , 2 024
Do Not Publish
No. 15,913.

#### Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation et al. *v.*Flanders.

(195 P. [2d] 742)

Decided June 21, 1948.

Mr. Charles M. Rose, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. John W. El well, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.

Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Stone, dissent.
Exhibit  32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In connection with the  annual  report  of  InterCare DX,  Inc.  (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on    the   date  hereof  (the  "Report"),
we,  Anthony  C.  Dike,  the  Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant   to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted pursuant to  Section 906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of  Section  13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to
InterCare  DX,  Inc.,  and  will  be  retained   by   InterCare  DX,  Inc.,  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: November 20, 2006          By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO
                               (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)






























                                       21
<Page>
### §1677h. Drawback treatment

For purposes of any law relating to the drawback of customs duties, countervailing duties and antidumping duties imposed by this subtitle shall not be treated as being regular customs duties.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §779, as added Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §622(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3039; amended Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1334(a), (b)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1209, 1210.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "Drawback treatment" for "Drawbacks" in section catchline and "not be treated as being regular" for "be treated as any other" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1337(d) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(a) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title.
Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) by
      China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Steven Jiao,
      hereby certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.








Dated:
      April 11, 2008





By:
      /s/
      Steven Jiao





Steven
      Jiao


Chief
      Financial Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12-13806

_____________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00018-WS-N-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

versus

MELISSA COLLINS GULLEDGE,

 Defendant – Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(January 22, 2014)

Before HILL and COX, Circuit Judges, and MIDDLEBROOKS,

∗ District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

 ∗ Honorable Donald M. Middlebrooks, United States District Judge for the Southern District of 

Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 12-13806 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Appellant Melissa Gulledge and her brother were charged in a twenty-eight 

count superseding indictment in 2011, involving an equity-skimming mortgage 

fraud scheme during the real estate boom along Alabama=s Gulf Coast. In 2007, 

the real estate boom went bust and the scheme unraveled. Gulledge was charged 

with fifteen counts: one count of conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. ' 1349; two counts 

of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. '' 1343 and 2; four counts of false loan applications 

under 18 U.S.C. '' 1014 and 2; and, eight counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. ''

1341 and 2.

After a five-day jury trial in December 2011, Gulledge was convicted of all 

fifteen counts. The district court denied her motions for judgment of acquittal. In 

this appeal, Gulledge claims there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to 

support the jury=s guilty verdicts on all counts.

 Having reviewed the record and considered oral argument of the parties, 

we affirm the district court in all respects related to this appeal in denying 

Gulledge=s motions for judgment of acquittal. 

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the United States, there 

is substantial evidence of Gulledge=s guilt, established through testimonial, 

stipulated, and documentary evidence.

The jury verdicts stand as rendered. 

Case: 12-13806 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 Page: 2 of 3 
3

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-13806 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 Page: 3 of 3
§ 668.154 Institutional accountability. An institution is liable for the title IV, HEA program funds disbursed to a student whose eligibility is determined under this subpart only if— ( a ) The institution used a test that was not administered independently, in accordance with § 668.151(b);
( b ) The institution or an employee of the institution compromised the testing process in any way; or
( c ) The institution is unable to document that the student received a passing score on an approved test.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091(d))
PUBLIC LAW 112–65—DEC. 13, 2011 125 STAT. 767 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1541: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 6, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–65 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To revise the Federal charter for the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc. to reflect 

a change in eligibility requirements for membership. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEMBERSHIP TERMS. 

Section 30504 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking the text preceding subparagraph (A) 

and inserting ‘‘she is a mother (meaning a woman who 

filled the role of birthmother, adoptive mother, step-mother, 

foster-mother, grandmother, or legal guardian) of a person 

who—’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘in World War 

II or the Korean hostilities’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or is a citizen of the 

United States living outside the United States’’ before the 

period at the end. 

Approved December 13, 2011. 

Dec. 13, 2011 

[S. 1541] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAWS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Case No. 08-35653-KRH 

Debtors. Chapter 11 

(Jointly Administered) 

____________________________________ 

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the 

Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 19-03091-KRH 

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, et al., 

Defendants. 

_____________________________________ 

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the 

Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 19-03060-KRH 

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, Acting United States 

Trustee for Region Four, 

Defendant. 

_____________________________________ 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 

In the interest of judicial economy, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned 

adversary proceedings shall be CONSOLIDATED. All filings shall be made only in Siegel v. 

United States Trustee Program, Adv. Pro. No. 19-03091-KRH. 

Dated: September 12, 2022 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

 Entered on Docket: Sept 12 2022

Case 19-03060-KRH Doc 30 Filed 09/12/22 Entered 09/12/22 11:17:54 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
```

[112th Congress Public Law 65]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 767]]

Public Law 112-65
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To revise the Federal charter for the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc. 
          to reflect a change in eligibility requirements for 
            membership. <<NOTE: Dec. 13, 2011 -  [S. 1541]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEMBERSHIP TERMS.

    Section 30504 of title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking the text preceding subparagraph (A) 
                and inserting ``she is a mother (meaning a woman who 
                filled the role of birthmother, adoptive mother, step-
                mother, foster-mother, grandmother, or legal guardian) 
                of a person who--''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``in World War 
                II or the Korean hostilities''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or is a citizen of the 
        United States living outside the United States'' before the 
        period at the end.

    Approved December 13, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1541:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            Nov. 18, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
because the federal court deemed them unexhausted did not demonstrate

good cause. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003); Colley v. State, 105 Nev. 235, 236, 773 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1989). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty
Parraguirre 

# C ht Cherry cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge Carlos Otero Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789790
<NAME> 86B.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         151,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               330,138
<PP&E>                                      14,156,180
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,685,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,800,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,730,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,800,510
<SALES>                                      1,481,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,497,565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,528,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 80 80 44 0 0 1,797 3,505 5,302 3,565 6,952 10,517 0.0 0.0 0.0

2-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 40 0 0 824 3,525 4,348 1,634 6,991 8,625 0.0 0.0 0.0

3-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 41 0 0 860 3,526 4,386 1,705 6,994 8,699 0.0 0.0 0.0

4-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 40 0 0 1,855 3,519 5,374 3,680 6,980 10,660 0.0 0.0 0.0

5-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 32 0 0 1,887 3,507 5,394 3,742 6,957 10,699 0.0 0.0 0.0

6-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 31 0 0 1,488 2,691 4,178 2,951 5,337 8,288 0.0 0.0 0.0

7-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 29 0 0 1,196 2,859 4,055 2,373 5,671 8,044 0.0 0.0 0.0

8-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 16 16 29 0 0 1,861 3,531 5,392 3,691 7,004 10,695 0.0 0.0 0.0

9-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 27 0 0 1,480 4,312 5,792 2,936 8,552 11,488 0.0 0.0 0.0

10-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 12 12 28 0 0 1,463 4,299 5,762 2,902 8,527 11,429 0.0 0.0 0.0

11-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 28 0 0 1,349 4,298 5,647 2,675 8,526 11,201 0.0 0.0 0.0

12-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 1,441 4,297 5,738 2,859 8,523 11,382 0.0 0.0 0.0

13-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 1,538 4,287 5,825 3,050 8,503 11,553 0.0 0.0 0.0

14-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 1,722 4,296 6,018 3,415 8,521 11,936 0.0 0.0 0.0

15-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1,869 4,305 6,174 3,707 8,539 12,246 0.0 0.0 0.0

16-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1,888 4,301 6,189 3,745 8,531 12,276 0.0 0.0 0.0

17-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 4 4 9 0 0 2,430 4,302 6,732 4,819 8,534 13,353 0.0 0.0 0.0

18-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 0 0 3,241 4,296 7,538 6,429 8,522 14,951 0.0 0.0 0.0

19-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 5 0 0 3,459 4,300 7,760 6,861 8,530 15,391 0.0 0.0 0.0

20-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3,386 4,312 7,698 6,716 8,553 15,269 0.0 0.0 0.0

21-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4,039 4,306 8,344 8,011 8,540 16,551 0.0 0.0 0.0

22-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3,937 4,308 8,246 7,810 8,545 16,355 0.0 0.0 0.0

23-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 3,361 3,989 7,350 6,666 7,913 14,579 0.0 0.0 0.0

24-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2,895 4,305 7,199 5,742 8,538 14,280 0.0 0.0 0.0

25-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,446 4,307 6,753 4,851 8,543 13,394 0.0 0.0 0.0

26-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 8 8 2 0 0 1,891 4,302 6,193 3,750 8,534 12,284 0.0 0.0 0.0

27-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 595 4,295 4,890 1,180 8,519 9,699 0.0 0.0 0.0

28-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 265 4,297 4,562 525 8,523 9,048 0.0 0.0 0.0

29-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 16 16 3 0 0 175 4,297 4,472 348 8,523 8,871 0.0 0.0 0.0

30-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1,821 3,504 5,325 3,612 6,951 10,563 0.0 0.0 0.0

31-Jul-20 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 2,064 3,500 5,564 4,093 6,943 11,036 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 292 292 XXXX 0 0 60,521 123,680 184,201 120,043 245,319 365,362 XXXX 0.0 0.0

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

JULY 2020

Tracy Combined CVP

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta Smelt Daily Density

SWP Combined
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August
4, 1995, relating to the June 30, 1995, financial statements of LarsonoDavis
Incorporated, in the annual report of LarsonoDavis Incorporated on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997, into the following registration statements
filed on behalf of LarsonoDavis Incorporated:  registration statement on Form S-
8, SEC File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990; registration statement on Form S-
8, SEC File No. 33-44784, filed December 30, 1991; registration statement on
Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-1505, effective as of March 22, 1996; registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-6527, effective as of August 2, 1996;
registration statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-24553, filed April 4, 1997;
registration statement on Form S-3, SEC File No. 333-29923, effective as of
October 3, 1997; and registration statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-38919,
filed October 28, 1997.


/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.


PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.
(formerly Peterson, Siler & Stevenson, P.C.)

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 26, 1998
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 4120** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ERNEST JAMES JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cr - 00054

- 1 )

Submitted : August 31, 2012 Decided: September 11, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dana F. Eddy, EDDY LAW OFFICE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, Joseph F . Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ernest James Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial. On appeal, Johnson contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2006) , and that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial

. We affirm. Johnson contends that there was insufficient evidence before the jury to support his § 924(c) conviction. Johnson challenges only the jury’s finding that he possessed the firearm in furtherance of the drug trafficking offense. A jury verdict must be sustained “if, viewing the evid ence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the verdict is supported by substantial evidence.” United States v. Smith , 451 F.3d 209, 216 (4th Cir. 2006 ) (internal quotation marks omitted). Whether a firearm “furthered, advanced, or helped forwar d a drug trafficking crime

. . . is ultimately a fact ual question

. ” United States v. Perry , 560 F.3d 246, 254 (4th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted) . We have reviewed the record and conclude that the Government presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt3 that Johnson was guilty of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. Johnson also asserts that the district court erred by denying his motion for a new trial following the admission of testimony regarding hi s prior conviction for armed robbery. “ We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial. ” United States v. Perry , 335 F.3d 316, 320 (4th Cir. 2003). After rev iewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson’s motion

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

QFO LABS, INC., Appellant

v.

PARROT S.A., PARROT DRONES S.A.S., PARROT, INC., Appellees

______________________

2018

- 1663, 2018

- 1664

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2016

- 01550, IPR2016

- 01559.

______________________

JUD GMENT

______________________

B RAD P EDERSEN

, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by P HILLIP A. C OLE , Lommen Abdo, Minneapolis, MN;

C HAZ D E L A G ARZA , Law Offices of Chaz De La Garza

, Minneapolis, MN ; C HARLES A. L EMAIRE , Lemaire Patent Law Firm PLLC, Burnsville, MN.

M ATTHEW A. T RAUPMAN

, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Alsorepresented by J AMES M. G LASS ; A RCHITH R AMKUMAR

, Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK

, C LEVENGER

, and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 3, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court