alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3506. Service of papers filed in opposition to official request by United States to foreign government for criminal evidence

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any national or resident of the United States who submits, or causes to be submitted, a pleading or other document to a court or other authority in a foreign country in opposition to an official request for evidence of an offense shall serve such pleading or other document on the Attorney General at the time such pleading or other document is submitted.

(b) Any person who is a party to a criminal proceeding in a court of the United States who submits, or causes to be submitted, a pleading or other document to a court or other authority in a foreign country in opposition to an official request for evidence of an offense that is a subject of such proceeding shall serve such pleading or other document on the appropriate attorney for the Government, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, at the time such pleading or other document is submitted.

(c) As used in this section, the term "official request" means a letter rogatory, a request under a treaty or convention, or any other request for evidence made by a court of the United States or an authority of the United States having criminal law enforcement responsibility, to a court or other authority of a foreign country.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1217(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2166.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984, see section 1220 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3505 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 527

 543

 380

 360

 315

 286

 313

 393

 390

 371

 345

 336

 254

 259

 265

 284

 321

 332

 352

 354

 351

 351

 352

 360

 367

 369

 372

 378

 381

 379

 371

 229

 219

 190

 195

 201

 200

 202

 242

 247

 255

 246

 242

 245

 253

 256

 266

 285

 316

 328

 346

 337

 342

 344

 348

 360

 365

 367

 372

 377

 372

 359

 331

 340

 256

 252

 241

 232

 251

 285

 285

 291

 280

 267

 252

 257

 260

 277

 303

 323

 339

 349

 345

 346

 348

 352

 363

 367

 369

 376

 379

 377

 366

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 221

 226

 174

 172

 165

 159

 171

 192

 192

 196

 189

 181

 172

 175

 177

 187

 203

 216

 226

 232

 229

 230

 231

 234

 240

 243

 244

 248

 250

 249

 242

TOTAL 9,659

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 607.21 What are the selection criteria for planning grants? The Secretary evaluates an application for a planning grant on the basis of the criteria in this section. ( a ) *Design of the planning process.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of the planning process that the applicant will use to develop a comprehensive development plan and an application for a development grant based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The planning process is clearly and comprehensively described and based on sound planning practice;
( 2 ) The president or chief executive officer, administrators and other institutional personnel, students, and governing board members systematically and consistently will be involved in the planning process;
( 3 ) The applicant will use its own resources to help implement the project; and
( 4 ) The planning process is likely to achieve its intended results.
( b ) *Key personnel.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of key personnel to be involved in the project based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The past experience and training of key personnel such as the project coordinator and persons who have key roles in the planning process are suitable to the tasks to be performed; and
( 2 ) The time commitments of key personnel are adequate.
( c ) *Project Management.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of the plan to manage the project effectively based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The procedures for managing the project are likely to ensure effective and efficient project implementation; and
( 2 ) The project coordinator has sufficient authority, including access to the president or chief executive officer, to conduct the project effectively.
( d ) *Budget.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the extent to which the proposed project costs are necessary and reasonable.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0114) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057-1059, 1066-1069)
[52 FR 30529, Aug. 14, 1987, as amended at 70 FR 13374, Mar. 21, 2005]
Exhibit 32.1

              Earth Products and Technologies, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Earth Products and Technologies, Inc. certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

..     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   March 25, 2005
                                        /s/ John W. Peters
                                        ____________________________________
                                        John W. Peters
                                        Principal Executive Officer
                                        Principal Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 402

 397

 455

 537

 604

 649

 724

 511

 505

 551

 681

 642

 573

 457

 334

 294

 237

 311

 427

 345

 389

 305

 380

 434

 436

 483

 499

 784

 284

 286

 511

 150

 150

 151

 153

 154

 156

 158

 164

 166

 172

 176

 170

 174

 174

 168

 168

 168

 164

 164

 160

 160

 161

 167

 174

 176

 177

 177

 170

 163

 164

 165

 210

 202

 207

 202

 195

 204

 213

 213

 221

 245

 283

 254

 240

 226

 206

 197

 184

 190

 196

 190

 186

 183

 205

 223

 233

 227

 230

 244

 194

 194

 206

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,207

 2,283

 2,363

 2,437

 2,502

 2,574

 2,653

 2,729

 2,808

 2,905

 3,027

 3,097

 3,117

 3,115

 3,111

 3,106

 3,083

 3,071

 3,072

 3,058

 3,031

 3,001

 2,985

 2,963

 2,913

 2,886

 2,876

 2,894

 2,882

 2,879

 2,901

 158

 163

 169

 174

 179

 184

 190

 195

 201

 208

 216

 221

 223

 223

 222

 222

 220

 219

 219

 218

 217

 214

 213

 212

 208

 206

 205

 207

 206

 206

 207

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.29 Individual plant or premises.

An application for a basic permit must be filed, and permit issued, to cover each individual plant or premises where any of the businesses specified in section 103 of the Act is engaged in.

[T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789789
<NAME> 86A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          76,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,381
<PP&E>                                       7,125,711
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,682,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 594,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     575,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   594,270
<SALES>                                        555,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               559,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  463,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,423
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
|    | EXHIBIT 32.1  |    |
|--------------|--------------------|--------------|

|    | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  |    |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|

| Solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of ALL Fuels & Energy Company (the “Company”), hereby certify that:   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1)  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 19, 2009.  | ALL FUELS & ENERGY COMPANY  |    |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------|

| By:  | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY  |    |
|-----------|-----------------------------|--------------|

|    | Dean E. Sukowatey, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Acting Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 628.44 When and for what purposes may a grantee use the endowment fund corpus? ( a ) ( 1 ) During the grant period, a grantee may not withdraw or spend any part of the endowment fund corpus.
( 2 ) If, during the grant period, a grantee withdraws or spends all or part of the endowment fund corpus, it must repay to the Secretary an amount equal of 50 percent of the amount withdrawn or spent plus the income earned on that amount.
( b ) At the end of the grant period, the institution may use the endowment fund corpus for any educational purpose.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065)
#### § 84.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 84.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 135

 135

 137

 139

 141

 143

 145

 155

 171

 223

 260

 307

 290

 269

 303

 257

 385

 471

 531

 491

 502

 687

 626

 750

 1,064

 739

 802

 558

 421

 287

 392

 131

 133

 134

 135

 137

 138

 140

 141

 142

 144

 147

 147

 149

 150

 151

 150

 149

 152

 152

 154

 159

 166

 173

 178

 184

 180

 178

 168

 160

 151

 145

 132

 133

 135

 137

 138

 141

 143

 146

 150

 165

 184

 192

 184

 187

 189

 171

 178

 192

 204

 210

 230

 269

 289

 310

 338

 298

 278

 242

 215

 183

 178

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,912

 1,907

 1,903

 1,901

 1,899

 1,900

 1,903

 1,910

 1,922

 1,952

 2,002

 2,061

 2,112

 2,167

 2,224

 2,262

 2,305

 2,360

 2,426

 2,495

 2,582

 2,705

 2,844

 2,989

 3,143

 3,249

 3,343

 3,398

 3,424

 3,436

 3,436

 137

 136

 136

 136

 136

 136

 136

 136

 137

 139

 143

 147

 151

 155

 159

 162

 165

 169

 173

 178

 184

 193

 203

 214

 225

 232

 239

 243

 245

 245

 245

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 756

 759

 743

 741

 734

 722

 727

 728

 726

 734

 722

 708

 702

 706

 695

 677

 911

 941

 930

 865

 959

 950

 995

 942

 929

 985

 980

 973

 968

 907

 968

 724

 731

 714

 731

 711

 705

 710

 713

 714

 694

 651

 660

 672

 674

 657

 541

 437

 322

 312

 510

 299

 297

 291

 286

 290

 263

 282

 287

 280

 268

 291

 739

 748

 730

 737

 722

 715

 720

 721

 719

 724

 693

 682

 686

 690

 678

 592

 605

 578

 529

 684

 440

 543

 553

 491

 516

 539

 563

 550

 544

 552

 565

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 473

 478

 467

 471

 462

 458

 461

 462

 460

 463

 444

 437

 440

 442

 435

 382

 390

 373

 343

 439

 288

 352

 358

 319

 335

 349

 364

 356

 352

 357

 365

TOTAL 19,548

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### Hugh J. Reilly, Appellant, *v.*Jose Antonio Frias and Latin American Contracting and Improvement Company, Respondents.

*Injunction.*

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of September, 1913, granting an injunction *pendente lite.*

Per Curiam:

This court cannot undertake to decide the disputed questions of fact upon the hopelessly contradictory affidavits contained in this record. As those are the very matters put in issue by the complaint, counterclaim and reply, an injunction *pendente lite*preserving the *status quo*seems authorized. We think, however, that the bond required of the defendant Latin American Contracting and Improvement Company should be increased to $5,000, and that the plaintiff should have leave to renew the .motion to vacate the injunction if the defendants interpose unreasonable delay to the trial of the action. The order appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as indicated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 577

 573

 615

 539

 493

 555

 587

 578

 560

 579

 552

 558

 595

 624

 579

 584

 586

 588

 600

 569

 596

 585

 557

 549

 551

 568

 565

 551

 502

 542

 565

 399

 388

 449

 394

 419

 427

 404

 417

 440

 437

 467

 476

 425

 443

 441

 425

 429

 426

 434

 434

 424

 423

 441

 453

 449

 450

 445

 419

 400

 411

 417

 497

 430

 528

 464

 458

 487

 495

 484

 492

 503

 505

 523

 504

 538

 514

 498

 497

 490

 503

 492

 495

 484

 486

 494

 487

 524

 514

 482

 434

 465

 479

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 323

 282

 342

 303

 299

 317

 322

 315

 320

 327

 328

 339

 327

 348

 334

 324

 323

 319

 327

 320

 322

 315

 316

 321

 317

 340

 334

 314

 284

 303

 312

TOTAL 15,246

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,519

 5,821

 5,414

 5,676

 4,960

 4,243

 4,488

 4,328

 4,379

 3,893

 3,809

 3,853

 4,854

 5,424

 6,164

 6,041

 6,156

 5,732

 5,220

 5,527

 5,105

 5,450

 5,676

 5,894

 6,623

 7,104

 8,001

 8,950

 9,941

 8,201

 6,966

 516

 442

 459

 499

 446

 452

 469

 517

 488

 393

 452

 429

 476

 504

 676

 508

 489

 516

 560

 562

 714

 812

 585

 699

 736

 750

 862

 1,873

 2,400

 1,491

 1,943

 2,030

 2,059

 2,038

 2,055

 1,913

 1,877

 2,048

 2,073

 2,021

 1,464

 1,603

 1,683

 1,953

 2,507

 2,846

 2,656

 2,704

 3,141

 2,721

 2,483

 2,753

 2,958

 2,800

 2,947

 3,034

 3,444

 3,866

 4,575

 5,508

 5,166

 4,253

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 18,761

 20,289

 21,814

 23,300

 24,350

 25,114

 25,706

 25,968

 26,343

 26,338

 26,393

 26,472

 26,632

 27,324

 28,140

 28,737

 29,403

 30,489

 31,297

 31,903

 32,608

 33,493

 34,272

 35,755

 37,186

 38,947

 40,860

 42,928

 45,590

 48,100

 49,649

 1,340

 1,449

 1,558

 1,664

 1,739

 1,794

 1,836

 1,855

 1,882

 1,881

 1,885

 1,891

 1,902

 1,952

 2,010

 2,053

 2,100

 2,178

 2,236

 2,279

 2,329

 2,392

 2,448

 2,554

 2,656

 2,782

 2,919

 3,066

 3,256

 3,436

 3,546

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Kirk N. Blackim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kirk N. Blackim
--------------------------
    Kirk N. Blackim
    President and Director


Date  December 14, 2005
      -----------------


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Homeland Security Network, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter D. Ubaldi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Peter D. UbaldiPeter D.UbaldiChief Executive OfficerDate: April 14, 2008
§ 690.10 Administrative cost allowance to participating schools. ( a ) Subject to available appropriations, the Secretary pays to each participating institution $5.00 for each student who receives a Federal Pell Grant at that institution for an award year.
( b ) All funds an institution receives under this section must be used solely to pay the institution's cost of administering the Federal Pell Grant, Federal Work-Study, and Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant programs.
( c ) If an institution enrolls a significant number of students who are attending less-than-full-time or are independent students, the institution shall use a reasonable proportion of these funds to make financial aid services available during times and in places that will most effectively accommodate the needs of those students.
[50 FR 10717, Mar. 15, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 45736, Dec. 1, 1987; 59 FR 54730, 54732, Nov. 1, 1994; 61 FR 60397, Nov. 27, 1996; 86 FR 59626, Oct. 28, 2021]