alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

August 2013

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total D

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In 

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,504 3,460 8,964 10,918 

2-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,196 3,272 7,468 8,322 

3-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,963 3,498 7,461 7,861 

4-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,961 3,510 7,471 7,856 

5-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,959 3,494 7,453 7,853 

6-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,428 3,518 7,946 8,783 

7-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,126 3,504 8,630 10,168 

8-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,172 3,521 8,693 10,259 

9-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,321 3,525 8,846 10,555 

10-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,209 3,533 8,742 10,333 11-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,571 3,503 9,074 11,051 12-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,487 3,304 8,791 10,883 

13-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,521 3,313 8,833 10,950 14-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 5,738 3,618 9,357 11,382 15-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,289 3,599 8,888 10,490 16-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,760 3,610 9,370 11,424 17-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,511 3,617 10,128 12,914 18-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,315 4,037 10,352 12,526 19-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 6,627 4,184 10,810 13,144 20-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7,095 4,206 11,300 14,072 21-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,925 4,198 11,122 13,735 22-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,945 4,177 10,122 11,791 23-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,896 4,178 11,075 13,679 

24-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7,126 4,185 11,310 14,134 25-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7,453 4,166 11,620 14,784 26-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,410 4,185 10,594 12,714 27-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7,104 4,205 11,309 14,090 28-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,990 4,209 11,199 13,864 29-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,664 4,199 10,863 13,218 30-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,542 4,206 9,747 10,992 31-Aug-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,609 4,194 9,802 11,125 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 4 4 8 XXXX 0 0 179,415 117,925 297,341 355,870 

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Preliminary

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 374

 334

 311

 340

 332

 275

 324

 274

 265

 256

 262

 285

 286

 304

 336

 314

 338

 317

 340

 316

 298

 298

 287

 270

 278

 278

 286

 290

 281

 289

 291

 247

 248

 232

 260

 273

 228

 224

 213

 212

 209

 221

 245

 243

 255

 278

 264

 256

 249

 249

 259

 258

 264

 268

 255

 271

 262

 279

 267

 265

 276

 284

 314

 295

 276

 295

 307

 250

 261

 245

 245

 234

 241

 265

 267

 274

 306

 279

 302

 264

 296

 285

 276

 283

 279

 261

 275

 268

 283

 282

 274

 281

 288

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 210

 198

 187

 198

 206

 171

 177

 167

 167

 161

 165

 180

 181

 185

 205

 188

 203

 179

 199

 192

 187

 191

 188

 177

 186

 182

 191

 190

 185

 190

 194

TOTAL 8,551

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
(Case No. 00146

#### In Re Application of Erika Smith.

*Opinion filed July 25, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

This claim arising out of the death of a fireman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et seq., 1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence at a review before the Court on June 15, 1978, the Court finds that:

1. The Claimant, Erika Smith, is the widow of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in the application for benefits;

2. The decedent, James M. Smith, was a firefighter, employed by the Chicago Fire Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning Section 2(e) of the Act, on November 24, 1977. He was 56 years of age;

*10493. On said date, at approximately 5:45 p.m., firefighter Smith responded to a fire alarm at his fire station, 330 West 104th Street, Chicago, Illinois directly east of 104th Street and Howard Avenue. As the fire truck left the station, Smith was standing, and riding, on the running board at the rear of the fire truck on the driver’s side. The truck turned north on Howard Avenue; and at 103rd Street and Howard Avenue, approximately one block from the fire station, firefighter Smith was noticed as missing from the truck. The truck returned to the station, and Smith was found laying in the street, at the intersection near the fire station, alongside the curb, unconscious, bleeding from his nose and mouth, with a pool of blood around his head. Smith was taken by fire department ambulance to a hospital where he was admitted at 6:15 p.m. the same day. Surgery was performed on November 26, 1977, and a trachectomy was also performed on December 4, 1977. Smith never regained consciousness and died on December 16,1977. The medical examiner’s certificate of death recites the cause of death as “cranio-cerebral injury, traumatic, severe;” due to a “fall from fire truck.” The fire call to which he had responded was later found to be a false alarm;

4. Firefighter Smith was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act;

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $20,000.00 be awarded to Erika Smith as widow and designated beneficiary of the deceased firefighter, James M. Smith.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 206

 202

 197

 191

 199

 206

 208

 206

 237

 210

 208

 262

 233

 238

 222

 231

 207

 191

 189

 201

 217

 194

 194

 199

 188

 184

 179

 177

 166

 150

 187

 179

 172

 174

 177

 181

 185

 182

 185

 185

 190

 194

 190

 189

 187

 181

 173

 172

 168

 171

 179

 181

 179

 180

 179

 173

 170

 157

 138

 137

 196

 191

 183

 181

 186

 191

 193

 195

 201

 199

 198

 215

 205

 199

 195

 191

 184

 181

 178

 182

 189

 188

 186

 184

 183

 179

 175

 171

 154

 144

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,585

 2,585

 2,595

 2,612

 2,635

 2,655

 2,671

 2,682

 2,691

 2,696

 2,700

 2,719

 2,728

 2,733

 2,732

 2,732

 2,733

 2,733

 2,725

 2,716

 2,712

 2,705

 2,690

 2,675

 2,660

 2,624

 2,594

 2,566

 2,525

 2,478

 185

 185

 185

 187

 188

 190

 191

 192

 192

 193

 193

 194

 195

 195

 195

 195

 195

 195

 195

 194

 194

 193

 192

 191

 190

 187

 185

 183

 180

 177

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 76-CV-0224

#### In Re Application of Ann Di Domenico

*Order filed September 14, 1978.*

Poch, J.

*1077This claim arises out of a criminal offense which occurred on March 13, 1975, at 1310 West Addison Street, Chicago, Illinois. The Claimant seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” hereinafter referred to as the Act *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70, Sec. 71, et seq.).*

Based on the investigatory report of the Attorney General and other documentary evidence this Court entered on order denying the claim on December 9, 1977. The Claimant objected to the order and sought a full hearing on the merits of her claim.

This claim was assigned to a Commissioner of this Court for the taking of evidence. At said hearing the Claimant testified in support of her claim.

Based on the preponderance of evidence adduced at said hearing, the Claimant was a victim of a violent crime defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act, to-wit: Robbery.

As the result of her injuries the Claimant incurred a hospital bill from Illinois Masonic Hospital for $11,779.60 and a physician’s bill from Dr. Walter Schwartz for $500.00. Both bills were paid in full by Medicare benefits. At the time the Claimant was receiving public aid benefits.

While totally disabled from March 13, 1975, to June 30,1975, the Claimant was not employed and had not been employed for over ten years before the incident. Therefore, she suffered no loss of earnings.

The Claimant suffered serious injuries causing pain and suffering but this is not a compensable loss under the Act.

Since the Claimant incurred no loss of earnings and incurred no pecuniary loss she is not entitled to *1078any award. Based on the foregoing evidence her claim must be denied.

It is hereby ordered that the order of this Court of December 9,1977, stand the claim of Ann Di Domenico be, and the same is hereby denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91103 / February 11, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-20163

In the Matter of

Covia Holdings Corp. and Fairmount 

Santrol Holdings Inc. now known as 

Bison Merger Sub I, LLC

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

August 31, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On December 8, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order 

(“Order”)1against Covia Holdings Corp. and Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc. now known as 

Bison Merger Sub I, LLC (collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission 

found that from 2014 to March 2018, Fairmount, a provider of sand-based products used by 

oil and gas exploration and production companies for fracking, misled investors by overstating 

the performance and commercial potential of high-margin proppant products it was 

developing and selling, PowerProp, Propel SSP and Propel SSP 350. Among other things, in 

the Order, the Commission ordered the Respondents to pay a $17 million civil penalty, on a 

joint and several basis, which shall be deemed satisfied by a cash payment from Covia in the 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10897 (Dec. 8, 2020).
2

amount of $1 million pursuant to Covia Holdings Corporation and its Debtor Affiliates’ 

confirmed Chapter 11 plan or an order of the bankruptcy court allowing such claim and 

authorizing such payment. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 

308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty collected can be distributed to 

investors harmed by the Respondents’ conduct described in the Order.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it needs time to solicit 

and evaluate fund administrator proposals, develop the distribution methodology, and develop 

the plan of distribution. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until August 31, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 84.650 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
§ 79.3 What programs and activities of the Department are subject to these regulations? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70343 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary publishes in the Federal Register a list of the Department's programs and activities that are subject to these regulations and identifies which of these are subject to the requirements of section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act.
( b ) If a program or activity of the Department that provides Federal financial assistance does not have implementing regulations, the regulations in this part apply to that program or activity.
( c ) The following programs and activities are excluded from coverage under this part: ( 1 ) Proposed legislation.
( 2 ) Regulation and budget formulation.
( 3 ) National security matters.
( 4 ) Procurement.
( 5 ) Direct payments to individuals.
( 6 ) Financial transfers for which the Department has no funding discretion or direct authority to approve specific sites or projects (e.g., block grants under Chapter 2 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act of 1981).
( 7 ) Research and development national in scope.
( 8 ) Assistance to federally recognized Indian tribes.
( d ) In addition to the programs and activities excluded in paragraph (c) of this section, the Secretary may only exclude a Federal financial assistance program or activity from coverage under this part if the program or activity does not directly affect State or local governments.
(Authority: E.O. 12372)
[48 FR 29166, June 24, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 20824, June 9, 1986]
EXHIBIT 23.1 Consent of Robert Early & Company, P.C.






             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-42086 regarding the Stock Compensation Plan
of KleenAir Systems, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2001 which was
included in the annual report on Form 10-K of KleenAir Systems, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2000.



/s/ ROBERT EARLY & COMPANY, P.C.


Abilene, Texas
April 12, 2001
















                                EXHIBIT 23.1
§ 682.702 Effect on participation. ( a ) Limitation, suspension, or termination proceedings by the Secretary do not affect a lender's responsibilities or rights to benefits and claim payments that are based on the lender's prior participation in the program, except as provided in § 682.709.
( b ) A limitation imposes on a lender— ( 1 ) A limit on the number or total amount of loans that a lender may purchase or hold under the FFEL Program; or
( 2 ) Other reasonable requirements or conditions, including those described in § 682.709.
( c ) A limitation imposes on a third-party servicer— ( 1 ) A limit on the number of loans or accounts or total amount of loans that the servicer may service;
( 2 ) A limit on the number of loans or accounts or total amount of loans that the servicer is administering under its contract with a lender or guaranty agency; or
( 3 ) Other reasonable requirements or conditions, including those described in § 682.709.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1080, 1082, 1085, 1094)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 22457, Apr. 29, 1994; 78 FR 65822, Nov. 1, 2013]
### §925B. Reporting of background check denials to State authorities

(a) In General.—If the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901) (referred to in this section as "NICS") provides a notice pursuant to section 922(t) that the receipt of a firearm by a person would violate subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 or State, local, or Tribal law, the Attorney General shall, in accordance with subsection (b) of this section—

(1) report to the local law enforcement authority of the State or Tribe where the person sought to acquire the firearm and, if different, the local law enforcement authorities of the State or Tribe of residence of the person—

(A) that the notice was provided;

(B) the Federal, State, local or Tribal prohibition;

(C) the date and time the notice was provided;

(D) the location of the licensee where the firearm was sought to be transferred; and

(E) the identity of the person; and

(2) where practicable, report the incident to State and local prosecutors or Tribal prosecutors in the jurisdiction where the firearm transfer was sought.

(b) Requirements for Report.—A report is made in accordance with this subsection if the report is made under subsection (a) within 24 hours after the NICS denies a firearm transfer in accordance with section 922(t) of title 18, United States Code, except that the making of the report may be delayed for so long as is necessary to avoid compromising an ongoing investigation.

(c) Amendment of Report.—If a report is made in accordance with subsection (b) and, after such report is made, the Federal Bureau of Investigation determines that the receipt of a firearm by a person for whom the report was made would not violate subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 or State, local, or Tribal law, the Attorney General shall notify any law enforcement authority and any prosecutor to whom the report was made of that determination.

(d) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to require a report with respect to a person to be made to the same State authorities that made the original denial determination with respect to the transfer of the firearm.

(Added Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XI, §1101(c), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 919.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
### §1501. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) the term "claimant" means the real party in interest that commences a proceeding before the Copyright Claims Board under section 1506(e), pursuant to a permissible claim of infringement brought under section 1504(c)(1), noninfringement brought under section 1504(c)(2), or misrepresentation brought under section 1504(c)(3);

(2) the term "counterclaimant" means a respondent in a proceeding before the Copyright Claims Board that—

(A) asserts a permissible counterclaim under section 1504(c)(4) against the claimant in the proceeding; and

(B) is the real party in interest with respect to the counterclaim described in subparagraph (A);

(3) the term "party"—

(A) means a party; and

(B) includes the attorney of a party, as applicable; and

(4) the term "respondent" means any person against whom a proceeding is brought before the Copyright Claims Board under section 1506(e), pursuant to a permissible claim of infringement brought under section 1504(c)(1), noninfringement brought under section 1504(c)(2), or misrepresentation brought under section 1504(c)(3).

(Added Pub. L. 116–260, div. Q, title II, §212(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2177.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Severability

Pub. L. 116–260, div. Q, title II, §212(f), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2200, provided that: "If any provision of this section [see Short Title of 2020 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title], an amendment made by this section, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this section and the amendments made by this section, and the application of the provision or the amendment to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 426

 418

 356

 351

 319

 367

 316

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 283

 238

 224

 240

 249

 230

 225

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 330

 320

 304

 312

 285

 275

 245

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:September 12, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 220

 214

 204

 209

 192

 186

 167

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TOTAL 2,071

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5306 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify the mailing 

requirement relating to social security account statements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2019 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut (for himself and Mr. BUCHANAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the mailing requirement relating to social security account statements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Social Se5 curity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT TO MAIL SOCIAL 

7 SECURITY ACCOUNT STATEMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1143 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–13) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5306 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by adding at the end 

2 the following: ‘‘Such statement shall be provided by 

3 mail unless the requesting individual chooses elec4 tronic delivery for that request.’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (c)(2)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘Beginning not later than’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘(A) Beginning not later than’’; 

8 (B) by inserting ‘‘by mail’’ after ‘‘provide’’; 

9 and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) In any case in which the Commissioner deter12 mines that an eligible individual described in subpara13 graph (A)— 

14 ‘‘(i) has accessed their statement electronically 

15 during the 1-year period ending on any date on 

16 which the Commissioner would otherwise be required 

17 to provide such statement by mail in accordance 

18 with this paragraph; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) has declined to receive their statement by 

20 mail for such period, 

21 the requirements of this paragraph shall be deemed to be 

22 satisfied for such period.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to social security 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5306 IH

1 account statements required to be provided after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS