alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6682** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville
. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 4:98

- cr - 00013

- H

- 1 )

Submitted : August 2 2 , 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Terrance Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Terrance Lamon t Moore seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit j ustice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the distr ict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (20 00); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT
In the interest of P.M.T., a child
, * From the 318th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. AD

- 32,977

.
No. 11

- 14

- 00346

- CV * June 10, 2015
* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Appellants.
#### § 668.79 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice will not be affected thereby.
§ 668.233 Student eligibility. A student with an intellectual disability is eligible to receive Federal Pell, FSEOG, and FWS program assistance under this subpart if— ( a ) The student satisfies the general student eligibility requirements under § 668.32, except for the requirements in paragraphs (a), (e), and (f) of that section. With regard to these exceptions, a student— ( 1 ) Does not have to be enrolled for the purpose of obtaining a degree or certificate;
( 2 ) Is not required to have a high school diploma, a recognized equivalent of a high school diploma, or have passed an ability to benefit test; and
( 3 ) Is making satisfactory progress according to the institution's published standards for students enrolled in its comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs;
( b ) The student is enrolled in a comprehensive transition and postsecondary program approved by the Secretary; and
( c ) The institution obtains a record from a local educational agency that the student is or was eligible for special education and related services under the IDEA. If that record does not identify the student as having an intellectual disability, as described in paragraph (1) of the definition of a student with an intellectual disability in § 668.231, the institution must also obtain documentation establishing that the student has an intellectual disability, such as— ( 1 ) A documented comprehensive and individualized psycho-educational evaluation and diagnosis of an intellectual disability by a psychologist or other qualified professional; or
( 2 ) A record of the disability from a local or State educational agency, or government agency, such as the Social Security Administration or a vocational rehabilitation agency, that identifies the intellectual disability.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-NEW4) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8, registration statement numbers 333-29007, 333-39799, 333-66469, and
333-36676, and on Form S-3, registration statement numbers 333-25177, 333-41407,
333-66471, 333-35382, and 333-5011, of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. of
our report dated July 28, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 1999 and
2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended May
31, 2000, which report appears in the May 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.

Our report dated July 28, 2000 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 28, 2000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,649

 3,737

 3,853

 3,875

 3,543

 3,180

 2,601

 1,785

 987

 990

 883

 1,353

 1,227

 1,504

 2,472

 3,242

 3,751

 2,662

 2,319

 1,911

 1,468

 992

 879

 895

 726

 1,045

 965

 1,558

 2,039

 2,254

 2,683

 249

 255

 252

 330

 283

 288

 289

 262

 239

 220

 192

 194

 156

 192

 200

 208

 240

 257

 260

 263

 260

 251

 236

 220

 214

 191

 182

 184

 188

 237

 206

 766

 1,037

 1,165

 1,184

 1,072

 925

 788

 608

 443

 358

 295

 309

 309

 367

 537

 814

 882

 727

 632

 537

 473

 378

 353

 349

 302

 275

 273

 336

 439

 557

 687

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 7,606

 8,234

 8,959

 9,599

 10,053

 10,277

 10,356

 10,350

 10,319

 10,254

 10,172

 10,077

 9,889

 9,626

 9,397

 9,174

 8,891

 8,434

 7,994

 7,606

 7,291

 7,061

 6,971

 6,962

 6,969

 6,935

 6,899

 6,868

 6,770

 6,513

 6,318

 543

 588

 640

 686

 718

 734

 740

 739

 737

 732

 727

 720

 706

 688

 671

 655

 635

 602

 571

 543

 521

 504

 498

 497

 498

 495

 493

 491

 484

 465

 451

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 76.682 Treatment of animals.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339, Aug. 29, 2024.

If a State or a subgrantee uses an animal in a project, the State or subgrantee shall provide the animal with proper care and humane treatment in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act of 1970.

(Authority: Pub. L. 89-544, as amended)
#### § 300.23 Individualized education program team.

*Individualized education program team* or *IEP Team* means a group of individuals described in § 300.321 that is responsible for developing, reviewing, or revising an IEP for a child with a disability.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(B))
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImproving Free-Piston Stirling Engine Power DensityAnalyses and experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of optimizing piston and displacer motion in a free piston Stirling Engine. Isothermal analysis shows the theoretical limits of power density improvement due to ideal motion in ideal Stirling engines. More realistic models based on nodal analysis show that ideal piston and displacer waveforms are not optimal, often producing less power than engines that use sinusoidal piston and displacer motion. Constrained optimization using nodal analysis predicts that Stirling engine power density can be increased by as much as 58% using optimized higher harmonic piston and displacer motion. An experiment is conducted in which an engine designed for sinusoidal motion is forced to operate with both second and third harmonics, resulting in a maximum piston power increase of 14%. Analytical predictions are compared to experimental data showing close agreement with indirect thermodynamic power calculations, but poor agreement with direct electrical power measurements.Document ID20160011721Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBriggs, Maxwell H.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 3, 2016Publication DateSeptember 1, 2016Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219144GRC-E-DAA-TN25529E-19267Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 887359.04.01.02.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsStirling enginesNetwork AnalysisPistonsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011721.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE


TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION


EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


                THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE TUESDAY MORNING
CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (this “Amendment”) is effective as set
forth below and is made by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of
Tuesday Morning Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


PRELIMINARY
STATEMENTS


                A.            The Company has previously established the Tuesday
Morning Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), for the benefit
of eligible employees of the Company. 
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the ESPP.


                B.            Pursuant to Section 8.1 of the ESPP, the Committee has
the right to make certain amendments to the ESPP.


                C.            The Committee desires to (1) establish a limit on the
number of shares of common stock that can be granted to employees pursuant to
the ESPP and (2) put a limit on the term of the ESPP.


AMENDMENT


                NOW, THEREFORE, the ESPP is
hereby amended as follows, effective September 18, 2007:


                1.  NUMBER OF SHARES; TERM.  Section 4.1 is hereby amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows:


                “4.1         Number of Shares; Term. 
The number of Shares which the Company may offer to Participants under
the Plan is limited to 250,000 Shares. 
Such Shares shall be purchased in open market transactions.  Unless the Plan is previously suspended or
terminated upon the adoption of a resolution of the Plan Administrators or the
Board of Directors of the Company, purchases under the Plan shall be permitted
with respect to Employee payroll deductions and Company matching contributions
through December 31, 2007.  No Employee
payroll deductions or Company matching contributions shall be made under the
Plan for periods after December 31, 2007. 
After Shares are purchased with contributions made under the Plan for
the month of December 2007, the Plan shall terminate and the Plan Administrator
shall take such actions as are required by Section 8.2 of the Plan.”


 


1

















 


                2.  Except as expressly set forth herein, the
ESPP shall remain in full force and effect without further amendment or
modification.


 


[The remainder of
this page is intentionally left blank.]


 


2

















                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of
the date specified below and effective as set forth herein.


	
   

  	
  TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:  September
  19, 2007

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ ELIZABETH
  A. SCHROEDER

  
	
   

  	
  Elizabeth A. Schroeder

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and

  
	
   

  	
  Treasurer

  



 


3
### subpart 1—representations alleging united states violations of obligations
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 818

 863

 910

 949

 969

 986

 1,018

 1,043

 1,043

 1,050

 1,022

 941

 933

 916

 866

 809

 800

 793

 838

 861

 918

 960

 896

 912

 902

 900

 825

 857

 575

 557

 538

 512

 487

 467

 446

 448

 419

 411

 406

 409

 404

 407

 406

 407

 403

 395

 382

 377

 375

 381

 368

 367

 366

 368

 364

 376

 664

 668

 676

 672

 633

 670

 652

 648

 631

 668

 641

 601

 586

 586

 566

 550

 566

 549

 540

 548

 550

 575

 587

 552

 583

 593

 546

 556

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:March 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 426

 429

 434

 431

 407

 430

 419

 416

 406

 429

 412

 387

 378

 378

 366

 356

 366

 355

 350

 355

 356

 371

 379

 357

 376

 382

 353

 360

TOTAL 16,857

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
(No. 73-CC-317

#### Harold Evans, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 20, 1973.*

Harold Evans, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X10-90107]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Friday, January 15, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EST.

Place: 624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Approval of Briefing Report on the Impact of Illegal 
Immigration on the Wages and Employment of Black Workers
     Approval of Briefing Report on Covert Wiretapping in the 
War on Terror
     Multi-Ethnic Placement Act Briefing Report
     Consideration of Findings & Recommendations
     Motion to Approve MEPA Finding 9
     Motion to Approve MEPA Recommendation 3
     Motion to Approve MEPA Recommendation 8
     Consideration of Timeline for MEPA Concurring/Dissenting 
Opinions & Rebuttals
     Approval of Follow-up Letter regarding Louisiana Justice 
of the Peace
     Discussion and possible letter involving new SEC corporate 
disclosure rule re: diversity
     Update & Action on Status of Collection and Web Posting of 
Documents for Commission Clearinghouse Project
     Update on Status of the 2010 Enforcement Report
     Consideration of Reporting Procedures for the Discovery 
Subcommittee on the 2010 Enforcement Report
     Update on Status of Title IX Project
II. State Advisory Committee Issues
     Pennsylvania
IV. Approval of December 16, 2009 Meeting Minutes
V. Staff Director's Report
VI. Adjourn

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public 
Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: January 5, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-141 Filed 1-5-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
### [§283. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–849, §2, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1126; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §822(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1132]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 697; June 28, 1949, ch. 268, §2(b), 63 Stat. 280, related to officers or employees interested in claims against the government. Pub. L. 87–849 continued limited applicability to retired officers of the Armed Forces of the United States. Pub. L. 100–180 repealed section to the extent that it had not been repealed by section 2 of Pub. L. 87–849. Section was supplanted by section 205 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Oct. 23, 1962, see section 4 of Pub. L. 87–849, set out as an Effective Date note under section 201 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 823

 817

 871

 825

 908

 959

 862

 913

 829

 877

 940

 830

 853

 732

 709

 684

 760

 809

 568

 724

 503

 658

 660

 695

 682

 579

 619

 623

 653

 653

 493

 550

 520

 464

 471

 503

 439

 428

 423

 476

 457

 510

 547

 541

 467

 436

 433

 467

 422

 483

 448

 464

 482

 518

 525

 519

 514

 584

 606

 578

 613

 694

 672

 599

 620

 681

 550

 566

 509

 657

 676

 626

 656

 635

 575

 524

 566

 605

 460

 653

 471

 530

 552

 604

 597

 546

 577

 602

 623

 628

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 395

 445

 431

 386

 399

 437

 356

 366

 331

 422

 434

 403

 421

 408

 371

 340

 366

 390

 300

 420

 307

 344

 357

 389

 385

 353

 373

 388

 401

 404

TOTAL 17,867

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

June 2002

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Jun-02 336 1392 1728 2684 0 0 0 0 552 1584 2136 1094 3142 4236

2-Jun-02 846 768 1614 2726 0 36 36 3 1271 2540 3811 2521 5039 7560

3-Jun-02 960 396 1356 2790 1 36 37 5 1228 3387 4615 2435 6718 9153

4-Jun-02 392 300 692 2812 10 60 70 10 1931 3597 5528 3830 7135 10965

5-Jun-02 732 108 840 2816 6 72 78 16 1560 3578 5138 3094 7097 10191

6-Jun-02 378 204 582 2813 0 72 72 21 1909 3231 5140 3786 6409 10195

7-Jun-02 900 192 1092 2784 0 48 48 24 1957 2771 4728 3881 5496 9377

8-Jun-02 420 144 564 1342 0 60 60 29 2664 2167 4831 5285 4298 9583

9-Jun-02 960 108 1068 1284 0 24 24 30 3096 1887 4982 6140 3742 9882

10-Jun-02 749 84 833 1305 7 36 43 33 3077 1794 4871 6103 3559 9662

11-Jun-02 21 36 57 1253 0 0 0 33 3449 1774 5223 6841 3518 10359

12-Jun-02 108 12 120 993 0 12 12 34 2393 1800 4194 4747 3571 8318

13-Jun-02 18 36 54 861 6 36 42 37 2424 1760 4184 4808 3491 8299

14-Jun-02 72 24 96 764 0 12 12 38 1726 1810 3536 3424 3590 7014

15-Jun-02 84 12 96 647 0 12 12 39 1739 1752 3491 3449 3476 6925

16-Jun-02 24 24 48 536 0 0 0 36 1916 1776 3691 3800 3522 7322

17-Jun-02 102 24 126 448 20 0 20 35 1908 1711 3619 3784 3394 7178

18-Jun-02 114 0 114 406 18 0 18 32 2423 1684 4107 4806 3340 8146

19-Jun-02 240 24 264 365 12 0 12 27 3368 1789 5157 6680 3548 10228

20-Jun-02 342 0 342 348 12 0 12 23 3066 1828 4893 6081 3625 9706

21-Jun-02 60 0 60 274 36 0 36 22 3223 1741 4964 6392 3454 9846

22-Jun-02 48 36 84 240 0 0 0 17 2360 1688 4048 4681 3348 8029

23-Jun-02 36 36 72 169 18 0 18 17 3842 2627 6468 7620 5210 12830

24-Jun-02 0 24 24 111 0 60 60 18 1096 4193 5289 2174 8316 10490

25-Jun-02 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 18 0 4320 4320 0 8569 8569

26-Jun-02 0 0 0 99 0 0 0 17 541 3640 4180 1073 7219 8292

27-Jun-02 0 0 0 95 0 12 12 15 2407 3378 5785 4775 6700 11475

28-Jun-02 0 0 0 88 6 0 6 15 2620 3378 5998 5196 6701 11897

29-Jun-02 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 14 2512 3356 5868 4982 6657 11639

30-Jun-02 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 14 2136 3383 5520 4237 6711 10948

Total 7942 3984 11926 XXXX 152 588 740 XXXX 64391 75924 140315 127719 150595 278314

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined