alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 663.10 How does an individual apply for a fellowship? ( a ) An individual applies for a fellowship by submitting an application to the Secretary through the institution of higher education at which the individual is employed.
( b ) The applicant shall provide sufficient information concerning his or her personal and academic background and proposed research project to enable the Secretary to determine whether the applicant— ( 1 ) Is eligible to receive a fellowship under § 663.3; and
( 2 ) Should be selected to receive a fellowship under subparts C and D of this part.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0306

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JOSEPH CLAUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 8 2023

03/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0306
December 2022

STORAGE 1000 ACREFEET COMPUTED*

RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

7.41

1 1,161.04 7.42 0.02 19 9 0 2 0.09 0.28

2 1,161.09 7.45 0.03 23 9 0 1 0.06 0.01

3 1,161.21 7.51 0.06 42 9 0 1 0.04 0.00

4 1,161.32 7.57 0.06 39 9 0 0 0.01 0.14

5 1,161.47 7.65 0.08 50 9 0 1 0.07 0.30

6 1,161.74 7.80 0.15 75 0 0 1 0.05 0.00

7 1,161.96 7.92 0.12 61 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

8 1,162.12 8.01 0.09 46 0 0 1 0.04 0.00

9 1,162.27 8.09 0.08 43 0 0 1 0.04 0.01

10 1,162.49 8.21 0.12 63 0 0 1 0.04 0.14

11 1,162.94 8.47 0.26 130 0 0 1 0.03 0.06

12 1,163.53 8.81 0.34 173 0 0 1 0.04 0.79

13 1,163.93 9.05 0.24 121 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

14 1,164.21 9.22 0.17 86 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

15 1,164.43 9.35 0.13 68 0 0 0 0.02 0.00

16 1,164.64 9.48 0.13 66 0 0 1 0.05 0.00

17 1,164.83 9.60 0.12 60 0 0 1 0.05 0.00

18 1,165.01 9.71 0.11 57 0 0 1 0.04 0.00

19 1,165.18 9.82 0.11 54 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

20 1,165.34 9.92 0.10 51 0 0 0 0.02 0.00

21 1,165.49 10.01 0.10 48 0 0 0 0.02 0.00

22 1,165.66 10.12 0.11 55 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

23 1,165.89 10.27 0.15 75 0 0 0 0.02 0.00

24 1,166.21 10.48 0.21 105 0 0 0 0.02 0.00

25 1,166.53 10.69 0.21 107 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

26 1,166.87 10.92 0.23 116 0 0 1 0.03 0.00

27 1,167.47 11.33 0.41 209 0 0 2 0.08 0.24

28 1,168.98 12.40 1.07 543 0 0 2 0.10 0.07

29 1,169.66 12.91 0.50 255 0 0 1 0.03 0.38

30 1,170.46 13.51 0.61 307 0 0 0 0.01 0.52

31 1,172.34 15.03 1.51 764 0 0 2 0.09 0.11

TOTALS 7.63 3,911 45 0 28 1.27 3.05

ACRE-FEET 7,630 7,757 89 0 56

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

 Data based on 24 hour period ending 0800.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 89

Spill 0

Total 89

Precipitation

This month = 3.05

July 01, 2022 To date = 5.17

October 01, 2022 To date = 4.16

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

East Park Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/5/2023
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT WITHOUT A MEETING OF
                             THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                       OF
                              TRIPLE S PARTS, INC.


     The  undersigned, being all the directors of Triple S Parts, Inc., a Nevada
(the "Corporation"), hereby consents to the adoption of the following resolution
by  written  consent  without  a  meeting  this  1st  day  of  November  2000;

     WHEREAS,  Tracie  Pollak  hereby  submits  her  resignation  as  President,
Secretary,  Treasurer and Director and Rick Hanna hereby submits his resignation
as  Vice-President;  and

     THEREFORE,  BE  IT RESOLVED, that the corporation accept the resignation of
Tracie  Pollak  as  President,  Secretary,  Treasurer  and  Rick  Hanna  as
Vice-President.

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the directors of this Corporation are empowered
and  directed,  in the name of and on behalf of this Corporation, to execute and
sign  this  resolution;  and  the officers of this Corporation are empowered and
directed in the name of and on behalf of this Corporation to execute and deliver
all  documents,  to  make  all  payments, and to perform any other act as may be
necessary  from  time  to  time  to  carry  out the purposes and intent of these
resolutions.  All  such  acts  and  doings  of  the officers of this Corporation
consistent  with  the purpose of this resolution is hereby authorized, approved,
ratified  and  confirmed  in  all  respects.


Dated:  11-1-00



/s/__________________________
Tracie  Pollak,  President,  Secretary  and  Director



/s/__________________________
Rick  Hanna,  Vice-President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,395
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  750
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)



</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00509

- CR

Elizabeth RIOS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9024B Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel , Mr. Dean A. Diachin from the Bexar County Public Defender’s Office, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation in this appeal. Counsel states t hat appellant has retained Mr. Richard E. Langlois to represent her in this appeal. Additionally, the clerk’s record shows Mr. Langlois filed a notice in the trial court stating that he has been retained as counsel for appellant on direct appeal.

The mo tion to withdraw is GRANTED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5 (providing that an appellate court may, on appropriate terms and conditions, permit an attorney to withdraw from representing a party in the appellate court).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
## COURT OF ApPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER 

## Cause No. 01-12-00746-CV; In re Angel Lozano 

## On Appeal from the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-61483 Relator, Angel Lozano , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests a response to relator's petition from real parties in interest, Michael Neal, Cynthia Neal, Neal & 

## Company, LLC , and Neal & 

## Neal, LLC. TEX . R. 

## ApP. P. 52.4 . Any response, or, in the alternative , a letter indicating that real parties in interest desire to waive their right to respond , is due to be filed in this Court by September 6, 2012. It 

## is so ORDERED. 

## Judge's signature:**----'-** 

## _**/.::<:s /_T~eIT~y--'J:....::e:...:n'"'_'n'"'_'in'_O.lg=>.'s"____**  

# o Acting individually 

# o Acting for the Court

Date : 8/24/2012

Note : Absent e mergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed. mu st wait ten d ays before acting on motion except for motion to e xtend time to file a brief. 

### See TEX . R. APP. 

### P. IO.3(a). Single just ice may grant or den y a ny reque st f or relief properly s ough t by motion , except in a c ivil c ase a s ingle ju st ice s hould not : ( I) act o n a petition f or an extrao rd inary writ or ( 2) di smi ss o r otherwi se d etermin e an app eal o r a mot ion f or rehe aring. TEX . R . APP. 

### P. IO.4 (a) .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 377

 350

 325

 314

 294

 288

 279

 274

 298

 303

 286

 282

 266

 257

 276

 296

 302

 277

 262

 260

 288

 295

 267

 251

 246

 236

 276

 289

 297

 297

 290

 188

 184

 178

 183

 187

 182

 179

 178

 181

 185

 188

 188

 186

 188

 188

 189

 194

 195

 207

 201

 203

 204

 202

 190

 201

 219

 233

 274

 292

 274

 275

 259

 242

 228

 226

 223

 223

 212

 209

 222

 217

 213

 211

 203

 203

 207

 212

 223

 221

 226

 221

 223

 223

 217

 212

 216

 227

 258

 279

 296

 282

 285

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:November 14, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 176

 166

 157

 156

 154

 154

 147

 145

 153

 150

 148

 146

 141

 141

 144

 147

 154

 153

 156

 153

 154

 154

 150

 147

 149

 156

 175

 188

 199

 190

 192

TOTAL 7,119

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01258**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 01258\01258_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01258\01258_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01258\01258_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 01258\01258_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01258\01258_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01258\01258_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01258\01258_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01258\01258_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01258\Certification Statement_01258.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258 follow up questions.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258 Steam Electric Questionnaire follow up questions.rtf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258_Part A_Section5_Map-1_Aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258_Part A_Section5_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258_Part C_Section3_CombinedAsh_P&ID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01258\Supporting Documentation\01258_Part C_Section3_CombinedAsh_PFD1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 361.900 What is the common identifier to be used by each one-stop delivery system? ( a ) The common one-stop delivery system identifier is “American Job Center.”
( b ) As of November 17, 2016, each one-stop delivery system must include the “American Job Center” identifier or “a proud partner of the American Job Center network” on all primary electronic resources used by the one-stop delivery system, and on any newly printed, purchased, or created materials.
( c ) As of July 1, 2017, each one-stop delivery system must include the “American Job Center” identifier or “a proud partner of the American Job Center network” on all products, programs, activities, services, electronic resources, facilities, and related property and new materials used in the one-stop delivery system.
( d ) One-stop partners, States, or local areas may use additional identifiers on their products, programs, activities, services, facilities, and related property and materials.
(No. 79-CC-0131

#### James E. O’Grady, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 31,1979.*

Per Curiam.

This claim coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

*942This Court finds that this claim is for the costs incurred by Claimant for the apprehension of fugitives pursuant to the extradition process authorized by the Governor of the State of Illinois. An investigation of this claim by the Department of Law Enforcement determined that money was appropriated for this expenditure by appropriation No. 011-45402-1200-02-00 and that a total of $32.07 was remaining in this appropriation at the time of the lapsing of said appropriation. Although the balance of the above appropriation is less than the amount claimed, sufficient funds existed at all other times when the individual obligations comprising the total claim were incurred. The following figures show that the Department of Law Enforcement was able to pay these obligations had bills been submitted at the time the obligations arose:

> Amount of Claims Submitted For: Fund Balance at the End of:

> September, 1977 - $ 745.72 September, 1977 - $187,993.18

> October, 1977 - $ 543.76 October, 1977 - $167,273.42

> December, 1977 - $1,459.27 December, 1977 - $136,625.94

> January, 1978 - $1,061.13 January, 1978 - $128,898.77

> March, 1978 - $2,060.20 March, 1978 - $ 85,405.02

> April, 1978 - $ 636.27 April, 1978 - $ 50,295.96

> May, 1978 - $ 991.24 May, 1978 - $ 40,199.67

> June, 1978 - $4,332.00 June, 1978 - $ 17,794.90

> Total Claim -$11,819.59

The amount due of $11,819.59 would have been paid in the regular course of business had the claim been presented to the proper office at the appropriate time, as shown in the written report of the Department of Law Enforcement, a copy of said report being attached to the joint stipulation of the parties. The $17,794.90 remaining at the end of the fiscal year, except for $32.07, was expended on other obligations the bills for which were presented to the Department before Claimant submitted its vouchers for the instant claim.

*943While it appears that the Department has incurred obligations in excess of its appropriation, the Court is cognizant of the fact that it is not feasible for the Department to accurately estimate the amount of money that will be required during the course of a fiscal year for the apprehension and return of fugitives. This is due to the fact that the number of fugitives varies every year and the fact that no predictable pattern of frequency can be formulated. Similarly, the time and effort, and therefore the cost to apprehend a fugitive, varies with each fugitive and depends upon the location involved. This is evidenced by the attachments to the complaint indicating destinations as close as Indiana and as far as Los Angeles, California.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $11,819.59 be and is hereby awarded to Claimant, J ames E. O’Grady, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause.
Exhibit 2

Case 18-31429-KLP    Doc 34-3    Filed 03/28/18    Entered 03/28/18 11:03:12    Desc  Exhibit 2 to Motion (Declaration of Michael McBride)    Page 1 of 2

Case 18-31429-KLP    Doc 34-3    Filed 03/28/18    Entered 03/28/18 11:03:12    Desc  Exhibit 2 to Motion (Declaration of Michael McBride)    Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,195.58

 1,195.58

 1,195.60

 1,195.65

 1,195.75

 1,195.90

 1,196.32

 1,196.46

 1,196.58

 1,196.68

 1,196.78

 1,196.86

 1,196.96

 1,197.07

 1,197.14

 1,197.23

 1,197.32

 1,197.43

 1,197.53

 1,197.74

 1,197.99

 1,198.19

 1,198.40

 1,198.38

 1,198.34

 1,198.37

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.67

 1,198.70

 1,198.50

 43.77

 43.77

 43.81

 43.89

 44.05

 44.30

 45.01

 45.25

 45.45

 45.62

 45.79

 45.93

 46.10

 46.28

 46.41

 46.56

 46.72

 46.91

 47.08

 47.45

 47.88

 48.23

 48.60

 48.57

 48.50

 48.55

 48.55

 48.53

 49.08

 49.13

 48.78

STORAGE

+0.02

+0.00

+0.03

+0.08

+0.17

+0.25

+0.71

+0.24

+0.20

+0.17

+0.17

+0.14

+0.17

+0.19

+0.12

+0.16

+0.16

+0.19

+0.17

+0.36

+0.43

+0.35

+0.37

-0.04

-0.07

+0.05

+0.00

-0.02

+0.55

+0.05

-0.35

CHANGE

12

2

19

44

86

127

361

125

104

89

87

72

88

98

66

82

82

100

93

189

222

184

312

91

44

130

102

85

678

463

35

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 122

 107

 78

 99

 99

 92

 395

 431

 210

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 4

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 2

 3

 5

 4

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 3

 2

 1

 5

 4

 2

C.F.S.

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .07

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .08

 .03

 .03

 .06

 .08

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .08

 .07

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .04

 .05

 1.39

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .44

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .43

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .04

 .05

 .33

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/03/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5.02 4,272 31 1,636 69 1.19 3.93

ACRE-FEET +5,020 8,474 61 3,245 137

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 3,245

OUTLET

TOTAL

 61

 3,306

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.93

JULY 1, 2010 8.73

 43.76
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; NIGMS Legacy Community-Wide 
Scientific Resources.
    Date: April 12, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3An12A, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0c0d9dbd2c2f0ddd1d9dc9eded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62120b090010220f030b0e4c0c0b0a4c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 31, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-8187 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 76.651 Responsibility of a State and a subgrantee. ( a ) ( 1 ) A subgrantee shall provide students enrolled in private schools with a genuine opportunity for equitable participation in accordance with the requirements in §§ 76.652-76.662 and in the authorizing statute and implementing regulations for a program.
( 2 ) The subgrantee shall provide that opportunity to participate in a manner that is consistent with the number of eligible private school students and their needs.
( 3 ) The subgrantee shall maintain continuing administrative direction and control over funds and property that benefit students enrolled in private schools.
( b ) ( 1 ) A State shall ensure that each subgrantee complies with the requirements in §§ 76.651-76.662.
( 2 ) If a State carries out a project directly, it shall comply with these requirements as if it were a subgrantee.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
§ 647.11 What assurances must an applicant submit? An applicant must submit as part of its application, assurances that— ( a ) Each participant enrolled in the project will be enrolled in a degree program at an institution of higher education that participates in one or more of the student financial assistance programs authorized under Title IV of the HEA;
( b ) Each participant given a summer research internship will have completed his or her sophomore year of study; and
( c ) ( 1 ) At least two thirds of the students to be served will be low-income individuals who are first-generation college students; and
( 2 ) The remaining students to be served will be members of groups underrepresented in graduate education.
( d ) A student will not be served by more than one McNair project at any one time and that the McNair project will collaborate with other McNair and SSS projects and other State and institutional programs at the grantee-institution, including those supporting undergraduate research, so that more students can be served.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-15)
[59 FR 43989, Aug. 25, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 65795, Oct. 26, 2010]