alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 692.10 How does the Secretary allot funds to the States? ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary allots to each State participating in the LEAP program an amount which bears the same ratio to the Federal LEAP funds appropriated as the number of students in that State who are “deemed eligible” to participate in the State's LEAP program bears to the total number of students in all States who are “deemed eligible” to participate in the LEAP program, except that no State may receive less than it received in fiscal year 1979 for the programs under this part.
( 2 ) For the programs under this part, if the Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year are not sufficient to allot to each State the amount of Federal funds it received in fiscal year 1979, the Secretary allots to each State an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of Federal funds appropriated as the amount of Federal funds that State received in fiscal year 1979 bears to the amount of Federal funds all States received in fiscal year 1979.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary determines the number of students “deemed eligible” to participate in a State's LEAP Program by dividing the amount of that State's LEAP expenditures, including both its Federal allotment and the State funds matching the allotment, by the average grant award per student of all participating States. The Secretary determines the “average grant award per student” by dividing the total number of student recipients for all States into the total amount of LEAP expenditures for all States, including both the Federal allotments and the State funds matching those allotments. In making this determination, the Secretary uses the most current available data reported by each State.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c, 1070c-2)
[52 FR 45433, Nov. 27, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 4223, Jan. 28, 1994; 65 FR 38730, June 22, 2000; 74 FR 55952, Oct. 29, 2009]
(No. 73—CC—148

#### Richard W. Hinds, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*269
      *Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

Richard W. Hinds, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Management Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.16 
 EnteroMedics Inc. 
 Management Incentive Plan 
  
  

	 	•	 	 Executives defined as the following “exempt only” positions: 


  

	 	o	President and CEO; 


	 	o	Senior Vice President; 


	 	o	Vice President; and 


	 	o	Controller. 

  

	 	•	 	 Target bonus as a percentage of base salary: 


  

	 	o	30%—President and CEO; 


	 	o	25%—Senior Vice President; 


	 	o	20%—Vice President; and 


	 	o	15%—Controller. 

  

	 	•	 	 Corporate and individual objective weighting by position: 


  

	 	o	100% corporate/0% individual—President and CEO; 


	 	o	90% corporate/10% individual—Senior Vice President; 


	 	o	75% corporate/25% individual—Vice President; and 


	 	o	40% corporate/60% individual—Controller. 

  

	 	 •
	 	 Corporate and individual objectives are to be established by the President and CEO and executive management and approved
by the Board of Directors at the recommendation of the Compensation Committee in the 1st quarter of the fiscal year. 



 

	 	 •
	 	 The Compensation Committee will review and recommend to the Board of Directors for approval the achievement of the
corporate and individual objectives in awarding bonuses in the 1st quarter of the fiscal year for the preceding fiscal year’s objectives.
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.81 Representation before TTB.

An applicant or certificate holder may be represented by an attorney, certified public accountant, or other person recognized to practice before TTB as provided in 31 CFR part 8 (Practice Before the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). The applicable requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527 (conference and practice requirements for alcohol, tobacco, and firearms activities) shall apply.
#### § 75.119 Information needed if private school students participate.

If a program requires the applicant to provide an opportunity for participation of students enrolled in private schools, the application must include the information required of subgrantees under 34 CFR 76.656.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0513)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 49143, Dec. 6, 1988]
§ 661.32 What priorities may the Secretary establish? ( a ) The Secretary may each year establish priorities for funding from the activities described in § 661.10.
( b ) The Secretary announces any priorities in the application notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1130a)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MITCHELL RAY HATFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2199

[April 18, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Okeechobee County; Michael Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

472017CF000537A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. 

Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 75.682 Treatment of animals.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70333, Aug. 29, 2024.

If a grantee uses an animal in a project, the grantee shall provide the animal with proper care and humane treatment in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act of 1970.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 4.3


                             CONSENT AND AMENDMENT


To Morgan Stanley Group Inc.:

        Reference is made to each of the following agreements and certificates
to which the undersigned is a party or which evidences an award previously made
to the undersigned (collectively, the "Agreements"):

        1.  Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1986, among
            Morgan Stanley Group Inc. and its stockholders a party thereto.

        2.  Each nonqualified stock option agreement, including all appendices
            and amendments thereto and each voting agreement entered into
            pursuant thereto, under the Morgan Stanley Group Inc. 1986 Stock
            Option Plan, as amended.

        3.  Each award agreement, including all appendices and amendments
            thereto and each voting agreement entered into pursuant thereto,
            under the Morgan Stanley Group Inc. Performance Unit Plan, as
            amended.

        4.  Each award agreement or certificate (including without limitation
            each option agreement, stock unit agreement, stock restriction 
            agreement, option certificate and stock unit certificate), including
            all appendices and amendments thereto and each voting agreement
            entered into pursuant thereto, under the Morgan Stanley Group Inc.
            1988 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended.

        The undersigned hereby consents to the amendment of each of the
Agreements, effective January 31, 1996, (1) so that each Agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Delaware (including without limitation the
1994 amendments to Section 218 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the
"DGCL")) and (2) so as to confirm (notwithstanding the lmitation on the term of
stockholder voting agreements and voting trust agreements imposed by Delaware
law prior to the 1994 amendments to Section 218 of the DGCL) that the
undertakings and covenants of the undersigned set forth in the Agreements,
including without limitation the covenants of the undersigned with respect to
the voting of shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Morgan
Stanley Group Inc., shall continue in full force and effect until they have
terminated or expired in accordance with the terms of the Agreements, as so
amended.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Consent and
Amendment as of the date indicated below.

Signature:              _______________________________

Name (please print):    _______________________________


Date:                   January 31, 1996
Custer

National

Forest

Rosebud County

M o n t a n a

W y o m i n g

Big Horn County

Powder River County

idan County

Rosebud County

pbell County

Big

H

o

r

n

C

o

u

nty

P

o

w

d

e

r

Riv

e

r

C

o

u

nty

P o

w

d e

r

R i v

e

r

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

Tongue

River

Reservoir

Otter

Creek

R

o

s

e

b

u

d

Cre

e

k

Powder

River

Cook Creek

Hanging

Woman

Creek

Bear

Creek

Trail Creek

Squirrel Creek

Indian Creek

Tenmile Creek

Badger Creek

Pumpkin

Creek

Bitter Creek

Crow

Reservation

Northern Cheyenne

Reservation

Birney

Decker

Quietus

Raptor Nest Locations within the WMPP Focus Area

Town

Raptor Nest

Operator Inventoried Area

WMPP Focus Area

Bureau of Indian Affairs Lands

US Forest Service Lands

Intermittent Stream

Stream

River

Tongue River Reservoir

County Boundary

State Boundary

0 5 10 15 20

Miles

0 10 20

Kilometers

Scale: 1:288,000

Projection: UTM Zone 13, NAD 83

Base Map: ESRI Corp. Shaded Relief

Rosebud, Big Horn and

Powder River Counties, Montana

1043 Coffeen Avenue, Suite D

Sheridan, WY 82801

(307) 673-4303
§ 19.118 Change in location. ( a ) If the location of the plant changes, the proprietor must: ( 1 ) File form TTB F 5110.41, Registration of Distilled Spirits Plant, to amend the registration;
( 2 ) File a new bond or a consent of surety on form TTB F 5000.18, subject to the exemption provided in § 19.151(d); and
( 3 ) Not begin operations at the new location prior to approval of the amended registration.
( b ) If there is a temporary change of delivery address within a plant with no change in plant location, the proprietor may file a letterhead notice to temporarily amend the registration.
(26 U.S.C. 5172, 5173, 5271)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1119, Jan. 4, 2017]
### §3402. Rules of procedure, practice and appeal 1

In all cases of conviction by a United States magistrate judge an appeal of right shall lie from the judgment of the magistrate judge to a judge of the district court of the district in which the offense was committed.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 831; Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §302(b), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1116; Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, §404(b)(2), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4651; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18 U.S.C., 1940 ed., §576a (Oct. 9, 1940, ch. 685, §2, 54 Stat. 1059).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–702 struck out second par. which read as follows: "The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules of procedure and practice for the trial of cases before magistrates and for taking and hearing of appeals to the judges of the district courts of the United States."

1968—Pub. L. 90–578 provided that the appeal shall be of right, substituted "a United States magistrate", "magistrate", and "magistrates" for "United States commissioners", "commissioner", and "commissioners", respectively, and provided that the appeals be to the judge of the district court and not to the district court and that the rules of the Supreme Court relate to appeals to the judges of the district courts rather than to the district courts.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judge" and "magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" and "magistrate", respectively, in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–702 effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as a note under section 2071 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 Section catchline was not amended to conform to change made in text by Pub. L. 100–702.
### Part IV—Transportation in Bond and Warehousing of Merchandise
§ 82.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
!"#$#%&'%	$

'"
$()% *+ *

,

)-   * +

."$/$-   * +

	



0121	"")2%!

	#&	311$$%!1/$1	


45$()#

&26)%&26) 

,

)-   **+*

."$/$-   **+*

+1+

7)
8491/$1	


&)
4	


$()%:$)$"*

,

)-   + 

."$/$-   + 



























:-  





	0&80,:4;8<!%:&%%

  "&) +=8>



?)"  7)$1/$$"1



8080@,0&:&;

0,8	A

















<
)  
  /)$) 
  BC)$)D 

 )E  
  ?)#+
$)1  1?)"  1  1?)"  $


)""""$)  )$#% 
  B?)"D  E)  )E  )1  
$"  B1D% 51$( 



$)1"1$(2
$

?)"
#
5"$#$(
)E$


1)")$$

#)")
E$11$(
05"$#$!$)1"%"/)E"E)
$
C)$)F1


$")
#$(3$"1$$))#
$"/
") <	GG1*1


 )/
$")E
)E
?)"$
"

""/?)?$1)
2?"$)E
?)"A

$/"1)$$((

-HH""
$/)/H",
)$))E?)"8$;)%

:A"
$$

)E?"$""1
?)"A"#$11""$
"

""$"C


)#1%C
2
%&27"*

 
$$91/""1?))
2$"1E$1
$
#
/$("($#)
/$
C)$)

Case 20-33113-KRH Doc 1240 Filed 12/03/20 Entered 12/03/20 11:44:45 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
 

!

"


#
 


$






%11("%*F1

$")/E$)1)"$"2$
$

:::)E
<$1	")"$$)F1
$")
#$(E)1
#)E
$"
)1$(

1
C)$)$
$"1$"$$"
)

") <	GG*1*F1
$")


#$(E)1

$EI"1$
C)$)$"$
?"$"")E
?)"A""%


$1$)"%1)

$"$$"F1
$")
#$(E)1

?)"A)$

)E  
  C)$)  1  )

)$  E)    
$(  )  
  C)$)  2  

)
$  1  


$/""1 ))
)$1?
)#$11F1
$")
#$(#$21
C)$)F

1
$")
#$(1/$1

(1E?"""E)
$
C)$)"?$"


3""E)
$E(1
$F1))E

)1$("
1?E)
$")F1

E11$?$)1"EE$$"

$(
E)%$$">08068080,>,-

 ,
C)$)$"(1""E)
$
$"1

  ,
  ?)"A  5"$#  
$)1  )  E$    

    
  E)  
  ?) $"

511
)(
1$1$(C
 %  

 ,
?)"A5"$#
$)1)")$$
")E


E)


?)$"511
)(
1$1$(C%  

* 0)E
$"1$"2$
)
31$)
?)"A$(
)"11$$)

1E
5"$)")E
05"$#$!$)1"2$
$2
$
)E$1")$$
)E


)E)($9$)E)/
$")%"/?"")

)
$

 &)$)E
C)$)"
)#$11
$"
?1/1())11"EE$$

)$  )E  "
  C)$)  1  
  I$/"  )E    8  *  1  
  4)

8""$"E$1?"
)$

 

Case 20-33113-KRH Doc 1240 Filed 12/03/20 Entered 12/03/20 11:44:45 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
 &)2$
"1$(8*
%
/"1)1$$)")E
$"1

$//1$EE$#1E)?)$"

 ,
?)"
)$91)$)""")EE
$E

(1$
$"1$)12$

C)$)

 ,
$")$"5"$#3$"1$$)2$
"
)/"$"$(E)/)

1)
$/
/$)%$
$)%1E)/)E
$"1

1-JJJJJJJJJJJJ

8$
/)1%$($$ <$1	"71(



Dec 3 2020 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Entered On Docket:Dec 3 2020

Case 20-33113-KRH Doc 1240 Filed 12/03/20 Entered 12/03/20 11:44:45 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
'0	=.8,>:	-

  H"H  
 	%
      

	
 



	

	

	

	



	



	




 !"#$#%&'%	$

'"
$()% *+ *

,

)-   * +

."$/$-   * +

	



0121	"")2%!

	#&	311$$%!1/$1	


45$()#

&26)%&26) 

,

)-   **+*

."$/$-   **+*

+1+

7)
8491/$1	


&)
4	


$()%:$)$"*

,

)-   + 

."$/$-   + 
























!")4)8 +%:
?$E

E)()$(
)
)"1)1
"?1)"1?

)"#1)""
$"

  H"H  
 	%
  



Case 20-33113-KRH Doc 1240 Filed 12/03/20 Entered 12/03/20 11:44:45 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                 SUBSIDIARIES OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                 ---------------------------------------------


The subsidiaries of Inland Steel Industries, Inc. (other than certain
subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, do not
constitute a significant subsidiary), each of which is incorporated in the State
of Delaware (except as noted below) and each of which is wholly owned (except as
noted below), either by Inland Steel Industries, Inc. or by one of its wholly
owned subsidiaries, are as follows:

     Inland Steel Company

            Inland Steel Mining Company

            Inland Steel Administrative Service Company (formerly known
            as Inland Steel Finance Company)

     Ryerson Tull, Inc. (majority owned by Inland Steel Industries, Inc.)
     (formerly known as Inland Materials Distribution Group, Inc.)

            Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.

            J. M. Tull Metals Company, Inc.
            (a Georgia corporation)
§ 647.30 What are allowable costs? The cost principles in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E, may include the following costs reasonably related to carrying out a McNair project: ( a ) Activities of an academic or scholarly nature, such as trips to institutions of higher education offering doctoral programs, and special lectures, symposia, and professional conferences, which have as their purpose the encouragement and preparation of project participants for doctoral studies.
( b ) Stipends of up to $2,800 per year for students engaged in research internships, provided that the student has completed the sophomore year of study at an eligible institution before the internship begins.
( c ) Necessary tuition, room and board, and transportation for students engaged in research internships during the summer.
( d ) Purchase, lease, or rental of computer hardware, software, and other equipment, service agreements for such equipment, and supplies for participant development, project administration, or project recordkeeping.
[59 FR 43989, Aug. 25, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 65797, Oct. 26, 2010; 79 FR 76103, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### Theodore Birke, Respondent, v. Held-Foster Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with, costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 853.]
Subject:

From: 

# Memorandum U.S.Department of Transportation Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportation Essential Air Service at Iron Mountain/Kingsford, MI; Brainerd, MN; International Falls, MN; and Rhinelander, WI

# ~- 

# ..**oJ~ :k~in1J.**  Schlemmer, Chief EAS & Domestic Analysis, X-53 Date: September 17, 2014 Reply to A.J. Muldoon, Attn. of: X-53, Ext. 61058**\~'\C\,-Sll.)** 

## J.o\\
-**o\~~** 

### c?ooq- o3oy JO \\ _ 0\0"

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 By Order 2014-8-10 (August 14, 2014), the Department requested that air carriers submit proposals to provide Essential Air Service (EAS) at Iron Mountain/Kingsford, MI, Brainerd, MN, International Falls, MN, and Rhinelander, WI, no later than September 17, 2014. On September 17, 2014, we received a request from Great Lakes Airlines to extendthe deadline for proposals bytwo weeks to October 1, 2014. The Department finds this request reasonable and has decided to grant it. Therefore, proposals for EAS at Iron Mountain/Kingsford, MI; Brainerd, MN; International Falls, MN; and Rhinelander, WI are nowdue no laterthan October 1, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 513 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 513

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain rules 
   related to the determination of unrelated business taxable income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2019

 Mr. Conaway introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain rules 
   related to the determination of unrelated business taxable income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nonprofits Support Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME BE 
              COMPUTED SEPARATELY FOR EACH TRADE OR BUSINESS ACTIVITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (6).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 13702 of Public Law 115-97.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF INCREASE OF UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME BY 
              CERTAIN DISALLOWED FRINGE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (7).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 13703 of Public Law 115-97.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TRX, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 13, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ H. Shane Hammond         
|H. Shane Hammond             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|                             
|/s/ David D. Cathcart        
|David D. Cathcart            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)