alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

November 2015

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 827 993 1,820 1,641 1,969 3,610 0.0 0.0

2-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 951 951 0 1,887 1,887 0.0 0.0

3-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,629 1,629 0 3,231 3,231 0.0 0.0

4-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,147 1,785 2,933 2,276 3,541 5,817 0.0 0.0

5-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,210 1,895 3,106 2,401 3,759 6,160 0.0 0.0

6-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,539 1,904 3,442 3,052 3,776 6,828 0.0 0.0

7-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,281 1,901 3,182 2,541 3,771 6,312 0.0 0.0

8-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,092 1,907 2,999 2,166 3,782 5,948 0.0 0.0

9-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,075 1,909 2,985 2,133 3,787 5,920 0.0 0.0

10-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 966 1,907 2,873 1,916 3,782 5,698 0.0 0.0

11-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 961 1,900 2,862 1,907 3,769 5,676 0.0 0.0

12-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 946 1,900 2,846 1,876 3,769 5,645 0.0 0.0

13-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,140 1,902 3,042 2,261 3,773 6,034 0.0 0.0

14-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 972 1,906 2,878 1,928 3,781 5,709 0.0 0.0

15-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 908 1,915 2,823 1,801 3,799 5,600 0.0 0.0

16-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 840 1,908 2,748 1,667 3,784 5,451 0.0 0.0

17-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 664 1,892 2,556 1,318 3,752 5,070 0.0 0.0

18-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 640 1,888 2,528 1,270 3,745 5,015 0.0 0.0

19-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 553 1,958 2,511 1,097 3,884 4,981 0.0 0.0

20-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 560 1,916 2,476 1,111 3,800 4,911 0.0 0.0

21-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 469 1,921 2,391 931 3,811 4,742 0.0 0.0

22-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 276 830 1,106 548 1,646 2,194 0.0 0.0

23-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 329 799 1,128 653 1,584 2,237 0.0 0.0

24-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 807 1,042 467 1,600 2,067 0.0 0.0

25-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 811 1,041 455 1,609 2,064 0.0 0.0

26-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 801 1,076 546 1,589 2,135 0.0 0.0

27-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 276 800 1,076 548 1,587 2,135 0.0 0.0

28-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 800 1,081 558 1,586 2,144 0.0 0.0

29-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 799 1,074 546 1,584 2,130 0.0 0.0

30-Nov-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 798 1,073 546 1,582 2,128 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 20,247 45,031 65,278 40,160 89,319 129,479 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP CVP
MARVIN M. SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5053

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mallory D. Cooper, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David Alan Henson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
Summary: Unknown Perpetrator Stole Historical Documents From 

the DOI Library 

Report Date: June 18, 2020 Report Number: 20-0344 

The OIG investigated the theft of illustrations torn from two Congressional Series Volumes 

maintained at the Stewart Lee Udall Building, also known as the Main Interior Building, library 

in Washington, DC. The stolen documents were illustrations of Matthew Perry’s expedition to 

Japan in the mid-19th century that were contained in two separate bound Congressional Series 

Volumes. 

We did not identify any suspects nor could we confirm when the illustrations were removed from 

the library. When library staff noticed the theft had occurred, the area of the library that housed 

these historical publications was open to the unescorted public. The library’s policy has since 

changed, and the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) no longer permits unescorted public 

access in certain areas of the library. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the Director of the Office of Facilities 

and Administrative Services. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

April 2004

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 36 48 84 85 4421 4391 8812 8769 8710 17479

2-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 24 12 36 83 3657 4342 7998 7253 8612 15865

3-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 6 12 18 78 3456 4387 7843 6855 8701 15556

4-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 74 3303 4180 7483 6551 8292 14843

5-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 69 4032 4355 8387 7997 8638 16635

6-Apr-04 0 0 0 1 12 0 12 59 5171 4361 9532 10257 8650 18907

7-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 49 5770 1945 7715 11445 3858 15303

8-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 2032 1217 3249 4030 2414 6444

9-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 3442 1650 5093 6828 3273 10101

10-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 3314 2628 5943 6574 5213 11787

11-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 3305 4025 7330 6556 7984 14540

12-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2940 4433 7373 5831 8793 14624

13-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 15 1950 4411 6361 3868 8750 12618

14-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1014 3871 4885 2011 7678 9689

15-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 266 1194 1460 527 2368 2895

16-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 1472 0 1472 2920 0 2920

17-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1519 0 1519 3013 0 3013

18-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1432 1432 0 2840 2840

19-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1362 571 1932 2701 1132 3833

20-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 180 0 180 358 0 358

21-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1455 0 1455 2886 0 2886

22-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1430 1430 0 2837 2837

23-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 982 573 1555 1948 1136 3084

24-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 1545 0 1545 3065 0 3065

25-Apr-04 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 2 1556 0 1556 3087 0 3087

26-Apr-04 0 72 72 5 0 0 0 2 14 1315 1329 27 2609 2636

27-Apr-04 0 0 0 5 0 24 24 3 898 535 1433 1782 1061 2843

28-Apr-04 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 1467 0 1467 2910 0 2910

29-Apr-04 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 1487 0 1487 2950 0 2950

30-Apr-04 0 204 204 20 0 12 12 4 0 1319 1319 0 2617 2617

Total 0 276 276 XXXX 102 120 222 XXXX 62011 58566 120577 122999 116166 239165

Delta Smelt Incidental Take Levels

Yellow Light Level = 400 (14 day Average)

Red Light Level = 12,345 (April-Below Normal)

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 289

 289

 292

 263

 278

 269

 256

 272

 305

 327

 330

 330

 323

 333

 386

 412

 416

 429

 431

 407

 403

 368

 372

 385

 381

 369

 356

 364

 364

 365

 261

 266

 249

 236

 252

 252

 244

 238

 239

 244

 250

 254

 255

 243

 243

 236

 267

 241

 248

 241

 239

 252

 254

 248

 248

 258

 252

 266

 275

 266

 276

 280

 275

 251

 263

 261

 251

 259

 274

 286

 290

 293

 289

 285

 306

 302

 331

 328

 337

 317

 317

 309

 315

 320

 314

 311

 302

 316

 322

 317

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 187

 189

 186

 171

 179

 177

 171

 176

 185

 193

 195

 197

 195

 192

 205

 203

 221

 219

 224

 212

 212

 207

 211

 214

 210

 208

 203

 211

 215

 212

TOTAL 8,897

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI IN D EMNITY COMPANY, and BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY

,

Plaintiffs Below

, Appellant s ,

v.

DAVID H. MURDOCK, C. MICHAEL CARTER, DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC. and DFC HOLDINGS, LLC

,

Defendants Below, App ellee s

. § § § No. 32, 2017 § § Court Below

— Superior Court of § the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N1 6C

- 01

- 104 § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

Submitted: January 23 , 2017 Decided: February 2 , 2017

Before HOLLAND

, VALIHURA

, and VAUGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 2 nd day of February 2017

, having considered the notice and

supplemental notice of app eal from an interlocutory order under Supreme Court

Rule 42 , it appears to the Court that:2

(1) On April 8 , 2016 , t he plaint iffs below

- appellant s , Arch Insurance

Company, Liberty Mutu al Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Insurance

Company, Navigators Insurance Company, RSUI Indemnity Company, and

Berkley Insurance Company ( “ Insurers ”) filed a n amended complaint against the

defendants below

- appellees

, David H. Murdock, C. Michael Carter, Dole Food

Company, Inc.

, and DFC Holdings, LLC

. The Insurers sought : (i) a declaratory

judgment that they did not have to fund the defense or settlement of a consolidated

class action in the Court of Chancery (Count I) ; and (ii) a declaratory judgment

that they were entitled to subrogation pursuant to a fra ud exclusion provision in the

relevant insurance policies and applicable law (Count II)

. Murdock, Carter, and

Dole filed a motion to dismiss

. In an opinion dated December 21, 2016, t he

Superior Court denied the motion to dismiss as to Count I, but grante d the motion

to dismiss as to Count II

. 1

(2) On January 3, 2017 , t he Insurer s filed an application for certification

to take an interlocutory appeal. Murdock, Carter, and Dole opposed the

application

. By order dated January 20, 2017, the Superior Court denied the

application after determining certification was not warranted under the principles

and criteria of Rule 42(b)

.

1 Arch Ins. Co, v. Murdock , 2016 WL 7414218 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 21, 2016).3

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound

discretion of the Court. 2 In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded

that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for

certification under Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED that the interlocutory

appeal is REFUSED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s / Karen L. Valihura Justice

2 Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).
#### ROSHEIM, Respondent, v. NELSON, Appellant.

(251 N. W. 818.)

(File No. 7540.

Opinion filed December 29, 1933.)

*Bailey Voorhee's,*oí Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*L. G. Atherton,*of Flandreau, for Respondent.

*107PER CURIAM.

In this case a certified copy of notice of appeal and notice of settlement of record were filed in this court on February 21, 1933. Since that time no further steps have'been taken in this court, and no 'brief has been filed in behalf of appellant.

The appeal is therefore deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
§ 668.217 Default prevention plans. ( a ) *First year.* ( 1 ) If your cohort default rate is equal to or greater than 30 percent you must establish a default prevention task force that prepares a plan to— ( i ) Identify the factors causing your cohort default rate to exceed the threshold;
( ii ) Establish measurable objectives and the steps you will take to improve your cohort default rate;
( iii ) Specify the actions you will take to improve student loan repayment, including counseling students on repayment options; and
( iv ) Submit your default prevention plan to us.
( 2 ) We will review your default prevention plan and offer technical assistance intended to improve student loan repayment.
( b ) *Second year.* ( 1 ) If your cohort default rate is equal to or greater than 30 percent for two consecutive fiscal years, you must revise your default prevention plan and submit it to us for review.
( 2 ) We may require you to revise your default prevention plan or specify actions you need to take to improve student loan repayment.
(Authority:20 U.S.C. 1082, 1085, 1094, 1099c)
(No. 73-CC-67

#### American Laundry Machinery, A McGraw-Edison Company Division, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 6, 1973.*

Teller, Levit & Silvertrust, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 183

 162

 135

 145

 182

 129

 126

 138

 154

 130

 119

 128

 136

 150

 148

 159

 158

 165

 174

 160

 164

 179

 185

 180

 183

 187

 176

 171

 174

 161

 158

 152

 115

 108

 113

 105

 95

 93

 95

 93

 92

 96

 107

 110

 120

 128

 128

 133

 135

 133

 133

 138

 132

 131

 139

 143

 145

 138

 136

 135

 132

 128

 159

 146

 121

 127

 140

 110

 110

 110

 110

 105

 106

 118

 123

 133

 140

 144

 147

 150

 151

 148

 151

 152

 153

 155

 161

 162

 154

 147

 148

 147

 144

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,264

 2,264

 2,232

 2,204

 2,187

 2,136

 2,083

 2,027

 1,969

 1,907

 1,845

 1,792

 1,745

 1,718

 1,699

 1,697

 1,723

 1,746

 1,757

 1,795

 1,836

 1,878

 1,921

 1,971

 2,026

 2,070

 2,101

 2,115

 2,123

 2,126

 2,123

 162

 162

 159

 157

 156

 153

 149

 145

 141

 136

 132

 128

 125

 123

 121

 121

 123

 125

 126

 128

 131

 134

 137

 141

 145

 148

 150

 151

 152

 152

 152

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 645

 643

 640

 658

 672

 653

 682

 680

 703

 698

 696

 687

 708

 715

 723

 715

 735

 741

 732

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 690

 686

 722

 767

 528

 577

 574

 579

 573

 571

 609

 608

 629

 626

 619

 582

 619

 659

 668

 651

 673

 682

 695

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 639

 541

 570

 555

 583

 612

 615

 616

 616

 616

 653

 657

 672

 678

 664

 647

 679

 688

 693

 682

 691

 710

 715

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 654

 628

 641

 640

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 376

 394

 396

 397

 397

 397

 420

 422

 431

 435

 426

 416

 436

 441

 444

 437

 443

 455

 458

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 420

 404

 412

 412

TOTAL 15,050

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 99.67 How does the Secretary enforce decisions? ( a ) If an educational agency or institution or other recipient of Department funds under any program administered by the Secretary does not comply during the period of time set under § 99.66(c), the Secretary may take any legally available enforcement action in accordance with the Act, including, but not limited to, the following enforcement actions available in accordance with part D of the General Education Provisions Act— ( 1 ) Withhold further payments under any applicable program;
( 2 ) Issue a complaint to compel compliance through a cease and desist order; or
( 3 ) Terminate eligibility to receive funding under any applicable program.
( b ) If, after an investigation under § 99.66, the Secretary finds that an educational agency or institution, other recipient, or third party has complied voluntarily with the Act or this part, the Secretary provides the complainant and the agency or institution, other recipient, or third party with written notice of the decision and the basis for the decision.
( c ) If the Office finds that a third party, outside the educational agency or institution, violates § 99.31(a)(6)(iii)(B), then the educational agency or institution from which the personally identifiable information originated may not allow the third party found to be responsible for the violation of § 99.31(a)(6)(iii)(B) access to personally identifiable information from education records for at least five years.
( d ) If the Office finds that a State or local educational authority, a Federal agency headed by an official listed in § 99.31(a)(3), or an authorized representative of a State or local educational authority or a Federal agency headed by an official listed in § 99.31(a)(3), improperly rediscloses personally identifiable information from education records, then the educational agency or institution from which the personally identifiable information originated may not allow the third party found to be responsible for the improper redisclosure access to personally identifiable information from education records for at least five years.
( e ) If the Office finds that a third party, outside the educational agency or institution, improperly rediscloses personally identifiable information from education records in violation of § 99.33 or fails to provide the notification required under § 99.33(b)(2), then the educational agency or institution from which the personally identifiable information originated may not allow the third party found to be responsible for the violation access to personally identifiable information from education records for at least five years.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(b)(4)(B) and (f); 20 U.S.C. 1234c)
[76 FR 75643, Dec. 2, 2011]
§ 361.15 Local administration. ( a ) If the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan provides for the administration of the plan by a local agency, the designated State agency must— ( 1 ) Ensure that each local agency is under the supervision of the designated State unit and is the sole local agency as defined in § 361.5(c)(47) that is responsible for the administration of the program within the political subdivision that it serves; and
( 2 ) Develop methods that each local agency will use to administer the vocational rehabilitation program, in accordance with the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan.
( b ) A separate local agency serving individuals who are blind may administer that part of the plan relating to vocational rehabilitation of individuals who are blind, under the supervision of the designated State unit for individuals who are blind.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0522) (Authority: Sections 7(24) and 101(a)(2)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(24) and 721(a)(2)(A))
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 19th

day of November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ABIGAIL VILLEGAS, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00293-CR; Trial Court No. 241-0447-14

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal 

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by 

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 30th day of December, 2014.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
#### § 682.608 [Reserved]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL 2 TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee 3 under POOLING AND SERVICING 4 AGREEMENT DATED AS OF 5 JUNE 1, 2007 SECURITIZED ASSET 6 BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC 7 TRUST 2007-BR5, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9 v. No. 34,947 10 SIMONE M. ROBINSON-VANN and 11 CURTIS VANN, 12 Defendants-Appellants. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 14 Valerie Huling, District Judge 15 Rose L. Brand & Associates PC 16 Eraina Edwards 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellee 19 JRSPC, LLC 20 Joshua R. Simms 21 Albuquerque, NM 222 for Appellants 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 HANISEE, Judge. 3 {1} Defendants-Appellants Simone M.Robinson-Vann and Curtis Vann 4 (Appellants) appeal from the district court’ s order denying their motion to dismiss for 5 lack of jurisdiction. [RP 157, 229; DSunnumbered 2] Summary affirmance was 6 proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. Plaintiff7 Appellee has filed a response in support of our notice of proposed disposition. No 8 memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so 9 has expired. 10 {2} Accordingly, we affirm. 11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12

_____________________________ 13 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 14 WE CONCUR: 15

__________________________________ 16 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 17

__________________________________ 183 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 1
#### §§ 76.666-76.669 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,579

 0

 0

 2,221

 1,972

 1,531

 1,513

 1,427

 1,553

 1,969

 1,228

 1,211

 1,424

 1,488

 1,183

 1,317

 1,839

 2,074

 1,836

 1,650

 1,659

 2,207

 2,812

 2,590

 2,735

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 290

 0

 0

 325

 388

 370

 324

 308

 343

 343

 343

 351

 362

 355

 356

 363

 320

 310

 325

 353

 355

 364

 334

 329

 364

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 870

 0

 0

 765

 702

 680

 570

 598

 542

 585

 477

 464

 493

 510

 497

 572

 644

 589

 570

 639

 610

 715

 886

 681

 756

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 8,330

 7,832

 7,221

 6,462

 5,700

 5,800

 4,996

 4,315

 4,401

 4,427

 4,453

 4,477

 4,608

 4,727

 5,312

 5,789

 6,253

 6,746

 7,256

 6,883

 7,455

 8,099

 7,923

 7,791

 7,750

 7,790

 7,907

 8,251

 8,347

 8,626

 595

 559

 516

 462

 407

 414

 357

 308

 314

 316

 318

 320

 329

 338

 379

 414

 447

 482

 518

 492

 533

 579

 566

 557

 554

 556

 565

 589

 596

 616

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER