alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 196

 188

 188

 192

 192

 188

 187

 188

 189

 193

 187

 185

 173

 175

 166

 163

 157

 162

 158

 153

 154

 156

 162

 162

 163

 167

 164

 168

 169

 167

 180

 180

 181

 182

 180

 180

 179

 178

 179

 176

 172

 169

 169

 164

 159

 154

 151

 150

 150

 148

 149

 148

 149

 151

 154

 158

 158

 159

 160

 160

 187

 184

 186

 185

 185

 183

 183

 182

 184

 183

 180

 176

 171

 171

 164

 159

 153

 153

 153

 151

 151

 151

 152

 155

 158

 160

 161

 162

 164

 163

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,353

 2,385

 2,409

 2,423

 2,442

 2,458

 2,477

 2,495

 2,515

 2,532

 2,546

 2,553

 2,548

 2,540

 2,517

 2,492

 2,459

 2,427

 2,395

 2,363

 2,331

 2,300

 2,268

 2,240

 2,218

 2,202

 2,192

 2,183

 2,183

 2,187

 168

 170

 172

 173

 174

 176

 177

 178

 180

 181

 182

 182

 182

 181

 180

 178

 176

 173

 171

 169

 167

 164

 162

 160

 158

 157

 157

 156

 156

 156

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 75.621 [Reserved]
### §2279. Boarding vessels before arrival

Whoever, not being in the United States service, and not being duly authorized by law for the purpose, goes on board any vessel about to arrive at the place of her destination, before her actual arrival, and before she has been completely moored, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

The master of such vessel may take any such person into custody, and deliver him up forthwith to any law enforcement officer, to be by him taken before any committing magistrate, to be dealt with according to law.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 805; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(D), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 708 of title 46, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Shipping (R.S. §4606).

"Law enforcement officer" was substituted for "constable or police officer" and "committing magistrate" for "justice of the peace." The phraseology used in the statute was archaic. It originated when the government had few law enforcement officers and magistrates of its own.

References to specific sections were made to read: "according to law" to achieve brevity.

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

The words "without permission of the master" were deleted to remove an inconsistency with the provisions of section 163 of title 46, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and customs regulations. Customs regulations, 1943, section 4.1c, prohibit any person "with or without consent of the master" from boarding vessel, with specific enumerated exceptions. Said section 163 prescribes a "penalty of not more than $100 or imprisonment not to exceed six months, or both" for violating regulations. The revised section increases the fine from $100 to $200 for boarding the vessel "with the consent of the master."

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $200" in first par.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lam, President and Chief Executive Officer of Balsam
  Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              
|    

| | By:    | */s/ David Lam*                      
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| | Name:  | DAVID LAM                            
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer)        
| | Date:  | May 23, 2005                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
(No. 74-CC-294

#### Northwest Dodge, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1974.*

Northwest Dodge, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S.

*247Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.(S)
1350, as adopted), I, Cristobal Conde, Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Data
Systems Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to my knowledge:

1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
     2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
     amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: March 28, 2003


/s/ Cristobal Conde
------------------------------
Cristobal Conde
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         169,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    178,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,103,195
<PP&E>                                       4,115,209
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,844,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,418,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,338,957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       113,112
<OTHER-SE>                                     778,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,418,015
<SALES>                                        734,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               734,766
<CGS>                                          218,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  820,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,424)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (305,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (305,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (305,152)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
#### § 602.38 Contesting the Secretary's final decision to deny, limit, suspend, or terminate an agency's recognition.

An agency may contest the Secretary's decision under this part in the Federal courts as a final decision in accordance with applicable Federal law. Unless otherwise directed by the court, a decision of the Secretary to deny, limit, suspend, or terminate the agency's recognition is not stayed during an appeal in the Federal courts.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          45,099
<SECURITIES>                                    22,821
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (532)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,337
<PP&E>                                           4,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,714)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,645
<SALES>                                          7,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,234
<CGS>                                            3,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,983)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (121)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.042)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
### §2342. Unlawful acts

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to ship, transport, receive, possess, sell, distribute, or purchase contraband cigarettes or contraband smokeless tobacco.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to make any false statement or representation with respect to the information required by this chapter to be kept in the records of any person who ships, sells, or distributes any quantity of cigarettes in excess of 10,000 in a single transaction.

(Added Pub. L. 95–575, §1, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2464; amended Pub. L. 109–177, title I, §121(a)(2), (b)(2), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 221, 222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–177, §121(b)(2), inserted "or contraband smokeless tobacco" after "contraband cigarettes".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–177, §121(a)(2), substituted "10,000" for "60,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subsec. (a) of this section effective Nov. 2, 1978, and subsec. (b) of this section effective on first day of first month beginning more than 120 days after Nov. 2, 1978, see section 4 of Pub. L. 95–575, set out as a note under section 2341 of this title.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

__________________ Division

In re 

Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE CHAPTER 13 PLAN, LISTS, SCHEDULES 

AND STATEMENTS AND REQUIRING DEBTOR TO GIVE NOTICE

AND HEARING THEREON 

The debtor(s) have filed a motion to extend the time for filing their Chapter 13 plan, lists, 

schedules and statements. Accordingly it is ORDERED that 

1. the debtor’s motion to extend the time to file a plan is granted.

2. the deadline for filing a Chapter 13 plan is extended to ______________________________.

3. the debtor(s) shall forthwith notify the trustee and all creditors of the respective deadline

set for the filing of the plan. 

4. under authority of Local Bankruptcy Rule 1007-1, the time is extended to

___________________________ for filing all lists, schedules and statements. 

If you fail to timely file any of the foregoing missing documents or a motion for further extension 

of time, you must file a response no later than ___________________________ and appear at a hearing 

to explain why the bankruptcy case should not be dismissed for failure to timely cure the deficiency and 

any other deficiency(ies) or certifications that accrue before the hearing. The hearing will be held: 

Date:

Time:

Location:

If the debtor(s) fails to file a timely response and appear at the hearing, the above-captioned case

PD\ be dismissed. 

NOTICE: The hearing will be held only if the debtor(s) fails to timely file any of the foregoing 

missing documents or a motion for further extension of time.

WILLIAM C. REDDEN 

Clerk of Court 

Date: ________________________ By ___________________________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

ENTERED ON DOCKET

_______________________________

[oex13ps ver. 11/19] 

 AMENDED

Richmond

James Edward Williamson, Jr.

Lori Sizemore Williamson 19-36644-KLP

January 21, 2020

January 23, 2020

January 22, 2020

January 29, 2020

9:30 AM

U. S. Bankruptcy Court, U. S. Courthouse, 701 E. Broad St., Room 5100, Richmond, VA 23219

January 8, 2020

January 8, 2020

/s/ Linda Smith

Case 19-36644-KLP Doc 13 Filed 01/08/20 Entered 01/08/20 09:39:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DARNELL BERNIE CALLOWAY, a/k/a Dirty, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cr-00051-jct-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darnell Bernie Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darnell Bernie Calloway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Calloway , No. 7:05-cr-00051-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 25, 2008). See United States v. Hood , 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny Calloway’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 246

 235

 221

 243

 225

 301

 369

 351

 298

 219

 326

 206

 215

 235

 226

 207

 353

 544

 563

 481

 480

 499

 379

 296

 308

 228

 223

 243

 266

 262

 199

 195

 191

 184

 178

 183

 184

 188

 181

 173

 170

 172

 174

 175

 172

 171

 171

 178

 186

 198

 208

 215

 201

 193

 186

 183

 178

 174

 175

 175

 211

 211

 202

 198

 193

 210

 220

 218

 205

 194

 215

 186

 186

 187

 180

 180

 197

 221

 234

 255

 268

 296

 246

 227

 217

 196

 190

 188

 189

 188

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,091

 3,098

 3,093

 3,082

 3,059

 3,045

 3,034

 2,992

 2,944

 2,897

 2,900

 2,877

 2,856

 2,836

 2,805

 2,774

 2,769

 2,792

 2,833

 2,878

 2,926

 3,004

 3,045

 3,078

 3,080

 3,090

 3,094

 3,095

 3,104

 3,112

 221

 221

 221

 220

 219

 218

 217

 214

 210

 207

 207

 206

 204

 203

 200

 198

 198

 199

 202

 206

 209

 215

 218

 220

 220

 221

 221

 221

 222

 222

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
      Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) by China Shen
      Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Steven Jiao, hereby
      certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.








Dated:
      April 22, 2008











By:
      /s/
      Steven Jiao





Steven
      Jiao


Chief
      Financial Officer
### §§1439, 1440. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §690(b)(4), (5), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2223

Section 1439, acts June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §439, 46 Stat. 712; Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §2(b), 67 Stat. 507, required master of a vessel from a foreign port or place, immediately upon arrival, to mail or deliver to designated employee a copy of manifest and any corrections thereto.

Section 1440, acts June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §440, 46 Stat. 712; Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §2(c), 67 Stat. 508, required master of a vessel to make post entry of any baggage or merchandise not included on manifest and to mail or deliver such entry to designated employee.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|/s/ DAN MOSES                    
|Dan Moses Chief Financial Officer



November 11, 2005
exv10w1



 




Exhibit 10.1


Description of Annual Stock Grants to Non-Employee Directors




     From 2000 through 2006, Pinnacle West’s non-employee directors of Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation (“Pinnacle West”) received annual grants of Pinnacle West common stock under the
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation 2000 Director Equity Plan (the “2000 Plan”). As a result of
Pinnacle West shareholder approval of the Pinnacle West Capital Corporation 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shares are no longer
available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. Rather, as disclosed in Pinnacle West’s 2007 proxy
statement, annual common stock grants to non-employee directors will now be made under the 2007
Plan. The Human Resources Committee of Pinnacle West’s Board of Directors approved annual grants of
Pinnacle West common stock to non-employee directors under the 2007 Plan identical to the grants
previously made under the 2000 Plan, as follows:



     Each Pinnacle West non-employee director will annually receive 1,100 shares of Pinnacle West
common stock under the 2007 Plan on the first business day of July, beginning July 2, 2007, subject
to the following restrictions: In the first calendar year in which a non-employee director is
eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan, he or she must own at least 900 shares of Pinnacle West’s
common stock as of December 31 of the same calendar year to receive a grant of 1,100 shares of
Pinnacle West common stock. If the non-employee director owns 900 shares of common stock as of
June 30, he or she will receive a grant of 1,100 shares of common stock on the first business day
of July of the same calendar year. If the non-employee director does not own 900 shares of
Pinnacle West’s common stock as of June 30 in the first calendar year in which the non-employee
director is eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan, but acquires the necessary shares on or
before December 31 of the same year, he or she will receive a grant of 1,100 shares of common stock
within a reasonable time after Pinnacle West verifies that the requisite number of shares has been
acquired. In each subsequent year, the number of shares of Pinnacle West’s common stock the
non-employee director must own to receive a grant of 1,100 shares of common stock will increase by
900 shares, until reaching a maximum of 4,500 shares. In each of the subsequent years, the
non-employee director must own the requisite number of shares of Pinnacle West’s common stock as of
June 30 of the relevant calendar year.