alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 428

 359

 0

 0

 0

 250

 247

 266

 256

 257

 253

 260

 254

 259

 245

 250

 240

 236

 232

 240

 247

 228

 234

 231

 230

 233

 226

 224

 244

 246

 263

 263

 0

 0

 0

 228

 225

 228

 228

 233

 232

 233

 233

 232

 223

 219

 205

 209

 211

 215

 214

 218

 222

 224

 222

 217

 216

 210

 202

 198

 290

 292

 0

 0

 0

 239

 239

 243

 240

 242

 239

 241

 240

 240

 235

 232

 226

 220

 220

 223

 224

 221

 226

 227

 225

 223

 220

 218

 213

 208

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,671

 3,714

 3,463

 3,213

 2,960

 2,947

 2,930

 2,919

 2,904

 2,888

 2,869

 2,842

 2,794

 2,745

 2,690

 2,630

 2,856

 3,076

 3,296

 3,280

 3,265

 3,243

 3,229

 3,214

 3,200

 3,182

 3,162

 3,140

 3,118

 3,094

 262

 265

 247

 230

 211

 211

 209

 209

 207

 206

 205

 203

 200

 196

 192

 188

 204

 220

 235

 234

 233

 232

 231

 230

 229

 227

 226

 224

 223

 221

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 6867

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

D. K. McIntosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 80232 / March 13, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15654

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

G-TRADE SERVICES LLC, : ORDER DIRECTING THIRD

CONVERGEX GLOBAL MARKETS : DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

LIMITED, and CONVERGEX :

EXECUTION SOLUTIONS LLC :

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

On July 24, 2015, the Commission approved the Plan of Distribution (“Plan”)1for the 

above-captioned matter. The Plan provides for the distribution of $109,436,318.00, plus 

interest, to harmed customers according to the methodology set forth in the Plan. 

Pursuant to an order entered on November 23, 2016,2the Commission disbursed 

$63,479,137.82 for a first tranche distribution to 200 Direct Customers and 892 Indirect 

Customers. Pursuant to an order entered on February 22, 2017,

3

the Commission disbursed 

$5,615,131.58 for a second tranche distribution to 1 Direct Customer and to 176 Indirect 

Customers. The Secretary has been granted authority to issue future orders to disburse 

amounts from the Fair Fund upon receipt of written certification from the Managing Executive

of the Division of Enforcement that he has received a payment file with distribution payments 

to Direct and/or Indirect Customers that is validated as being in accord with the Plan as 

authorized by the Commission.

 

1

 See Order Approving a Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 75519 (July 24, 2015).

2

 See Order Directing Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 79235 (Nov. 23, 2016).

3

 See Order Directing Second Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 80078 (Feb. 22, 2017).
2

The Secretary has now received written certification from the Managing Executive of 

the Division of Enforcement that he has received a conforming payment file in the amount of 

$1,925,301.67 with distribution payments to 2 Direct Customers and 91 Indirect Customers.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall disburse 

$1,925,301.67 of the Fair Fund from the JPMorgan Escrow Account to the Fund 

Administrator’s account at Citibank, N.A., and that the Fund Administrator shall distribute 

such monies to investors as provided for in the Plan. 

By the Commission. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
Exhibit 10.151

 

English translation - for reference ONLY

 

Letter of Interest for Buyer’s Credit Insurance

 

Ref. No.: I2015236

 

Date: May 8, 2015

 

To: CITIBANK NA

 

Your request for a letter of interest in respect of Buyer’s Credit Insurance for the purchase of a VLCC (Hull No. H1355) by Navig8 Crude Tankers INC. incorporated in the Marshall Islands from Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. has been received. After preliminary assessment and review, we would like to express our interest in providing export credit insurance support to the project.

 

This letter of interest represents only our interest in and attention to the foregoing project and is not legally binding upon us. We assume no liability through the issuance of this letter of interest. The final decision on whether to provide insurance coverage or not depends upon our comprehensive assessment and review of the project.

 

 

China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation

 

Shanghai Branch
#### Cornelia Fontana et al., by Gabriel Fontana, Their Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Mary E. Lesinger, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
480 P.2d 168

#### The STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. NEW MEXICO PROPERTY APPRAISAL DEPARTMENT, Haskel B. Smith, Director, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Kermit E. NASH, District Judge, Fifth Judicial District, Lea County, New Mexico, and Frank C. Smith, Respondents.

No. 9127.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 30, 1970.

Original Prohibition Proceeding

Ordered that the writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on September 10, 1970, be and the same is hereby made permanent ;

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices, concurring; TACKETT, Justice, dissenting, being for the proposition that the writ should be made permanent on the second count, and quashed on the first count of the petition.

Further ordered that the Temporary Restraining Orders and Orders to Show Cause issued by the Hon. Kermit E. Nash on September 1, 1970 and September 9, 1970, respectively, be and the same are hereby vacated and set aside; COMPTON, Chief Justice, and WATSON, SISK and Mc-KENNA, Justices, concurring; TACKETT, Justice, dissenting, being for the proposition that the orders to show cause with respect to the reinstatement should stand, and that portion of the orders dealing with the restraining and enjoining of the Property Appraisal Department should be vacated and set aside.

For opinion see 82 N.M. 279, 480 P.2d 169.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James G. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))and

2.

The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: May 15, 2003 |   | By:     | /s/ JAMES G. CLARK          |
|--------------------|--------|--------------|-----------------------------|
|               |   |         |                             |
|               |   | Name:   | **James G. Clark**          |
|               |   | Title:  | **Chief Financial Officer** |

22
(No. 74-CC-157

#### R. L. Cummins, d/b/a Cummins Food Specialties, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Louis G. Horman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 75.684 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

[85 FR 59979, Sept. 23, 2020]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ELIA PETTIT, FORMERLY KNOWN

AS ELIA RICH,

 Appellant,

v.

BARBARA MAXWELL, FORMERLY

KNOWN AS BARBARA PETTIT,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00241-CV

Appeal from

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011-DCV05317)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

summary judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause 

for further proceedings, in accordance with this Court=s opinion. We further order that Appellant 

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue, and this decision be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3610

___________ Karen Taylor, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Pete Geren, Secretary, United Stat es * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of the Army, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 27, 2009 Filed: December 29, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Karen Taylor appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her Title VII action alleging that sh e was not promoted because of unlawful discrimination. Upon de novo review, seeJacob-Mua v. Veneman , 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we hold that summary judgm ent was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789790
<NAME> 86B
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         185,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,744
<PP&E>                                      12,038,382
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,980,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,363,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,352,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,363,955
<SALES>                                        928,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               948,237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,755,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (807,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (807,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (807,041)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (46.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.24

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.22

 1,198.21

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.24

 1,198.24

 1,198.23

 1,198.23

 1,198.24

 1,198.21

 1,198.20

 1,198.19

 1,198.20

 1,198.20

 1,198.20

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.21

 1,198.19

 1,198.19

 1,198.19

 1,198.01

 1,197.79

 1,197.55

 48.32

 48.28

 48.28

 48.28

 48.28

 48.26

 48.30

 48.30

 48.32

 48.32

 48.30

 48.30

 48.32

 48.26

 48.25

 48.23

 48.25

 48.25

 48.25

 48.26

 48.26

 48.26

 48.26

 48.26

 48.23

 48.23

 48.23

 47.91

 47.53

 47.11

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.04

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

+0.02

-0.05

-0.02

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

+0.00

+0.00

-0.32

-0.38

-0.42

CHANGE

24

4

24

25

24

7

43

23

35

28

19

25

41

1

5

7

28

17

14

32

20

18

17

21

-4

11

13

19

20

19

INFLOW

 22

 14

 14

 14

 14

 10

 18

 18

 22

 22

 18

 18

 22

 10

 6

 3

 6

 6

 6

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 3

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 165

 200

 200

OUTLET

 10

 7

 9

 10

 9

 5

 6

 4

 3

 5

 9

 6

 9

 17

 7

 12

 12

 10

 7

 12

 9

 7

 6

 10

 10

 7

 9

 13

 14

 12

C.F.S.

 .18

 .12

 .16

 .18

 .15

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .16

 .10

 .16

 .30

 .13

 .21

 .21

 .17

 .13

 .21

 .15

 .13

 .10

 .18

 .18

 .13

 .15

 .22

 .25

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .29

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/24/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.23 580 592 322 266 4.68 .33

ACRE-FEET -1,230 1,150 1,174 639 528

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 639

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,174

 1,813

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .33

JULY 1, 2014 13.23

 48.33
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,088

 1,060

 1,084

 1,106

 1,083

 1,054

 1,113

 1,111

 1,139

 1,077

 1,056

 979

 984

 982

 955

 974

 960

 971

 774

 977

 1,041

 1,053

 1,037

 1,032

 1,029

 1,007

 992

 983

 272

 265

 273

 274

 277

 289

 286

 291

 293

 295

 296

 297

 302

 305

 322

 319

 320

 304

 238

 246

 334

 337

 345

 345

 347

 345

 344

 345

 556

 575

 562

 599

 500

 514

 574

 622

 624

 570

 580

 555

 547

 590

 549

 562

 541

 533

 447

 498

 585

 600

 588

 626

 646

 619

 614

 592

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 360

 371

 363

 386

 325

 334

 371

 400

 402

 368

 374

 359

 354

 381

 355

 363

 350

 345

 292

 324

 378

 387

 379

 403

 415

 399

 395

 382

TOTAL 15,968

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A#1 of Spare Backup, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Cery Perle, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

January 12, 2007                       /s/ Cery Perle
                                       --------------
                                       Cery Perle, President and CEO, principal
                                       executive officer and principal financial
                                       and principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 1 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 2 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 3 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 4 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 5 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 6 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 7 of 8
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 219-5 Filed 07/07/21 Entered 07/07/21 13:00:24 Desc

Wells Fargo Bank Statement Page 8 of 8
#### In the Matter of the Petition of William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, Appellant, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 5,109, Issued to Guiseppe Teti and Transferred to Solomon Noar, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laugh*919lin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. (Ingraham, P. J., and Scott, J., dissented.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5307 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5307

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, Alabama, as the ``Postmaster Robert 
                       Ingram Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2019

Ms. Sewell of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, Alabama, as the ``Postmaster Robert 
                       Ingram Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POSTMASTER ROBERT INGRAM SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 Nicol Avenue in Thomasville, Alabama, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Postmaster Robert Ingram Sr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Postmaster 
Robert Ingram Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 668.114 Notification of hearing. ( a ) Upon receipt of an institution's or third-party servicer's request for review, the designated department official arranges for a hearing before a hearing official.
( b ) Within 30 days of the designated department official's receipt of an institution's or third-party servicer's request for review, the hearing official notifies the designated department official and the parties to the proceeding of the schedule for the submission of briefs by both the designated department official and, as applicable, the institution or servicer.
( c ) The hearing official schedules the submission of briefs and of accompanying evidence admissible under the terms of § 668.116 (e) and (f) to occur no later than 120 days from the date that the hearing official notifies the institution or servicer.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
[59 FR 22452, Apr. 29, 1994]
ex10_7.htm


 Exhibit 10.7 




 


 Shaoyi Zhana, traducteur agréé de l ́Ordre des Traducteurs et lnterprétes du Québec (OTTIAQ) 


 Numéro d ́identification: 5070 


 Adresse : 28 rue du Manoir, Delson, QC., J5B 1B1, Télé: (514) 651-5569   Email : joyzhang55@yahoo.ca 



	   





 


 Translation 


 


 BUSINESS LICENCE 


 (Secondary licence)




 


 Registration No. 342500400000306(1-1) 


 


 


 Name of enterprise: Jingxian Zhending Mining Co. Ltd. 


 Legal form: Company with limited liability (Sino-foreign joint venture) 


 Address:   Wuxi. Langiao Town, Jing County, Xuancheng City, Anhui Province  


 Legal representative: Wei De Gang 


 Registered capital: 1,693,000 US Dollars 


 Date of registration: May 16, 2005 


 Business period: May 16, 2005 to May 16, 2025 


 Business scopes: Lead and Zinc mining, and mining of lower grade gold minerals to be processed with concentrate plante. 












 


 Xuancheng   State Administration for Industry & Commerce (SAIC) (Seal) November 17, 2014 



























 A true translation of the attached document of which I seen the original.
Editorial Note on Part 18
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 18 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, 5472, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 18.42 Record of alternation. After approval of the qualifying documents for the alternation of premises, the proprietor must execute a record each time that the premises are alternated. The record will contain the following information: ( a ) Identification assigned by TTB, including the plant or registry number, of the volatile fruit-flavor concentrate plant and the distilled spirits plant or bonded wine cellar;
( b ) Effective date and time of proposed change; and
( c ) Description of the alternation that identifies the diagrams depicting the premises before and after the alternation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0046) [T.D. ATF-455, 66 FR 29482, May 31, 2001]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN JOSEPH PRESKI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 205 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
(No. 74-CC-440

#### St. James Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 13, 1974.*

WlLCZYNSKI, WlLCZYNSKI, ClAMBRONE, KaRWOSKI AND Petrarca, Ltd., Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.