alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 734

 846

 1,124

 1,012

 1,486

 1,518

 2,042

 2,235

 2,027

 2,435

 3,356

 3,512

 3,137

 2,902

 2,131

 1,661

 2,242

 2,205

 2,487

 3,240

 4,841

 4,523

 3,280

 3,524

 3,082

 2,869

 2,801

 2,209

 1,016

 1,433

 1,178

 208

 215

 208

 177

 176

 171

 194

 216

 256

 316

 272

 288

 287

 285

 248

 220

 212

 213

 223

 269

 426

 341

 312

 260

 280

 280

 290

 315

 227

 220

 201

 313

 351

 344

 304

 342

 405

 509

 561

 557

 697

 994

 1,043

 946

 794

 632

 457

 484

 501

 626

 856

 1,385

 1,405

 834

 999

 846

 740

 773

 738

 450

 361

 345

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 13, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 7,136

 7,080

 7,061

 6,918

 6,757

 6,686

 6,612

 6,562

 6,485

 6,449

 6,779

 7,255

 7,715

 8,160

 8,479

 8,585

 8,725

 8,922

 9,206

 9,657

 10,533

 11,377

 11,654

 11,956

 11,808

 11,505

 11,332

 11,276

 11,094

 10,998

 10,859

 510

 506

 504

 494

 483

 478

 472

 469

 463

 461

 484

 518

 551

 583

 606

 613

 623

 637

 658

 690

 752

 813

 832

 854

 843

 822

 809

 805

 792

 786

 776

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     
Exhibit 12(b)
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                                        
 Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend Requirements

                                                                                           
                                                           Twelve Months Ended December 31,            
                                                                (Thousands of Dollars)             
                                                1991      1992      1993      1994      1995      1996
<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges:
   Consolidated net income                   $ 57,872  $ 59,990  $ 84,464  $ 74,930  $ 86,921  $ 90,618

Income taxes:
  Income taxes (includes amounts charged                           
    to  other  income  and deductions)         24,321    24,601    38,057    35,307    49,498    51,316
   Investment  tax  credit adjustment          (3,177)   (1,439)   (1,583)   (1,064)   (1,086)      776 

      Total  income  taxes                     21,144    23,162    36,474    34,243    48,412    52,092

Income  before  income  taxes                  79,016    83,152   120,938   109,173   135,333   142,710

Fixed Charges:
   Interest  on  long-term debt                54,370    53,408    53,706    51,172    51,147    52,165
  Amortization of debt discount,
     expense  and  premium  -  net                374       392       507       567       567       594
    Interest  on  short-term  bank  loans         935       647       220     1,157     3,144     2,269
    Other  interest                             3,297     1,011     2,023     1,538     1,598     2,319
   Interest  portion  of  rentals                 884       683     1,077       794       925       991

      Total  fixed  charges                    59,860    56,141    57,533    55,228    57,381    58,338

    Preferred  dividends  requirements          6,663     7,611     8,547    10,682    12,392    12,146
                                                                         
Total fixed charges and
        preferred  dividends                   66,523    63,752    66,080    65,910    69,773    70,484

Earnings  -  as  defined                     $138,876  $139,293  $178,471  $164,401  $192,714  $201,048

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
   preferred  dividends                         2.09X     2.18X     2.70X     2.49X     2.76X     2.85X

</TABLE>
ex10-58.htm


    
      

    

    
      
 

      


      


      Exhibit
        10.58

      


      


      


      


      


      September
        20, 2007

      


      


      


      The
        Honorable Gabrielle K. McDonald

      2001
        Holcombe Boulevard, #3201

      Houston,
        Texas 77030

      


      


      Dear
        Judge McDonald:

      


      Supplemental
        Agreement to the

      Consulting
        Agreement of November 1, 1999

      


      This
        Supplemental Agreement refers to the consulting agreement of November 1,
        1999
        (the "Consulting Agreement"), with the undersigned, FM Services Company (the
        "Company"), with respect to your performance of consulting services for the
        Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

      


      By
        way of
        this Supplemental Agreement, the Company would like to extend your Consulting
        Agreement from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.  All other
        terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain
        unchanged.

      


      Please
        confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
        to this matter by signing both originals of this Supplemental Agreement and
        returning one to me.

      


      Very
        truly yours,

      


      /s/
        Richard C. Adkerson

      


      Richard
        C. Adkerson

      Chairman
        of the Board

      FM
        Services Company

      


      


      AGREED
        TO AND ACCEPTED:

      


      


      BY:           /s/
        Gabrielle K.
        McDonald                                                                

              The
        Honorable Gabrielle K. McDonald

      


      DATE:                                October
        23,
        2007
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 10
Case 20-10683-KHK Doc 1 Filed 03/03/20 Entered 03/03/20 19:16:52 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 10
(No. 73-CC-144

#### Norwood Medical Center, S.C., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 26, 1973.*

Norwood Medical Center, S.C., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  708,503
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                        10,173,766
<ALLOWANCES>                            520,000
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     13,753,134
<PP&E>                              223,012,991
<DEPRECIATION>                       98,564,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      177,729,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                28,501,228
<BONDS>                              97,747,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 11,074
<OTHER-SE>                           28,279,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        177,729,762
<SALES>                              98,373,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     98,373,713
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        91,462,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    8,432,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,404,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (446,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (958,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (958,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 303.6 Child.

*Child* means an individual under the age of six and may include an *infant or toddler with a disability,* as that term is defined in § 303.21.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1432(5))
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Big Lake Financial Corporation
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Edwin E. Walpole, III, Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Big Lake Financial
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Bank as of and for the period covered by the
         Report.

Date:  February 18, 2004       By:  /s/ Edwin E. Walpole, III
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Edwin E. Walpole, III Chairman of the Board,
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 463.635 What is the compliance date of the provisions of this subpart? ( a ) No later than July 1, 2017, one-stop operators selected under the competitive process described in this subpart must be in place and operating the one-stop center.
( b ) By November 17, 2016, every Local WDB must demonstrate it is taking steps to prepare for competition of its one-stop operator. This demonstration may include, but is not limited to, market research, requests for information, and conducting a cost and price analysis.
#### Louis Michel, Appellant, v. The Ransomville Basket Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, A. Roland Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moldflow Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          b. [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

          c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: February 2, 2005

                                    /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    A. Roland Thomas
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
### §1402. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–39, title II, §201(b), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 201

Section, acts June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §402a, formerly §402, 46 Stat. 708; June 25, 1938, ch. 679, §8, 52 Stat. 1081, renumbered and amended Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, §2(a), (f), 70 Stat. 943, 946; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(d), 84 Stat. 288, provided an alternative basis for valuation of articles designated by the Secretary of Treasury as provided for by act Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, §6(a), 70 Stat. 948, as either the foreign value or the export value, whichever is higher, or if the appropriate customs officer determines that neither the foreign value nor the export value can be satisfactorily ascertained, then the United States value, or if the appropriate customs officer determines that neither the foreign value, the export value, nor the United States value can be satisfactorily ascertained, then the cost of production, or in the case of an article with respect to which there is in effect under section 1336 of this title a rate of duty based upon the American selling price of a domestic article, then the American selling price of such article, defined foreign value, export value, United States value, cost of production, and American selling price, and provided for review of the decision of the appropriate customs officer.

Provisions similar to those of this section were contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, §III, L and R, 38 Stat. 185, 189, and in act May 27, 1921, ch. 14, title III, §§301–304, 42 Stat. 15, 16, all of which were superseded by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §402, 42 Stat. 949, and were repealed by section 643 thereof. Section 402 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 402 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Earlier provisions on the subject were contained in R.S. §§2905–2907, and 2952, prior to repeal by act June 10, 1890, ch. 407, §29, 26 Stat. 141; and in act June 10, 1890, ch. 407, §§11 and 19, 26 Stat. 136, 139, as amended by act July 24, 1897, ch. 11, §32, 30 Stat. 211, and act Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, §28, 36 Stat. 97, 101, prior to repeal by act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, §IV, S, 38 Stat. 201.

R.S. §2906, requiring the collector to cause the actual market value, or wholesale price at the period of exportation, to be appraised, and providing that such appraised value should be considered the value upon which duty should be assessed, and R.S. §2913, relative to the appraisement of gloves protected by trademark, were repealed by section 642 of the act of Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §643, 42 Stat. 989.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1980, see section 204(a)(2) of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 1401a of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00464-CV

CTCHGC, LLC d/b/a Central Texas Gun Works; Centex Guns; CTGW; and 

Michael D. Cargill, Appellants

v.

Prosperity Bank, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-GN-23-006997, THE HONORABLE JESSICA MANGRUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant CTCHGC, LLC d/b/a Central Texas Gun Works filed a suggestion of 

bankruptcy on September 3, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. We therefore abate this appeal until a 

party files a motion to reinstate or a motion to sever. See id. R. 8.2, 8.3. Appellants are ordered to 

inform this Court of the resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings or some other event that would 

allow this appeal to be reinstated. Should they fail to provide such notice, the appeal will be 

subject to dismissal for want of prosecution on this Court’s or another party’s motion. See 

id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Theofanis

Abated

Filed: September 12, 2024
(April 12, 1943.)

#### Anna Bethel et al., Respondents, v. Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear by T.D. ATF-449, 66 FR 19085, Apr. 13, 2001.

#### § 13.3 Related regulations.

The following regulations also relate to this part:

7 CFR Part 205—National Organic Program

27 CFR Part 1—Basic Permit Requirements Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, Nonindustrial Use of Distilled Spirits and Wine, Bulk Sales and Bottling of Distilled Spirits

27 CFR Part 4—Labeling and Advertising of Wine

27 CFR Part 5—Labeling and Advertising of Distilled Spirits

27 CFR Part 7—Labeling and Advertising of Malt Beverages

27 CFR Part 9—American Viticultural Areas

27 CFR Part 12—Foreign Nongeneric Names of Geographic Significance Used in the Designation of Wines

27 CFR Part 16—Alcoholic Beverage Health Warning Statement

27 CFR Part 19—Distilled Spirits Plants

27 CFR Part 24—Wine

27 CFR Part 25—Beer

27 CFR Part 26—Liquors and Articles from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands

27 CFR Part 27—Importation of Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Beer

27 CFR 28—Exportation of Alcohol

27 CFR Part 71—Rules of Practice in Permit Proceedings

[T.D. ATF-483, 67 FR 62858, Oct. 8, 2002, as amended by T.D. TTB-8, 69 FR 3829, Jan. 27, 2004]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7298]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``C[eacute]zanne's Card Players''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``C[eacute]zanne's Card Players'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 7, 2011, until 
on or about May 8, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-807 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,874

 1,474

 1,053

 999

 789

 837

 470

 801

 1,292

 1,201

 1,104

 1,674

 1,698

 2,484

 1,724

 1,589

 1,456

 1,055

 1,218

 974

 2,253

 2,344

 2,651

 2,270

 2,812

 2,955

 2,295

 2,624

 3,497

 3,160

 2,411

 258

 248

 244

 221

 205

 186

 188

 183

 193

 184

 211

 235

 218

 237

 219

 232

 234

 238

 222

 204

 220

 227

 226

 267

 304

 266

 294

 392

 314

 351

 337

 585

 531

 402

 365

 300

 271

 230

 259

 337

 343

 374

 478

 556

 610

 487

 440

 404

 390

 439

 416

 519

 602

 553

 616

 720

 756

 712

 871

 1,005

 1,106

 883

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,914

 6,049

 6,121

 6,200

 6,211

 6,234

 6,239

 6,274

 6,355

 6,310

 6,085

 5,836

 5,714

 5,641

 5,543

 5,452

 5,454

 5,479

 5,618

 5,763

 6,052

 6,395

 6,611

 6,884

 7,230

 7,508

 7,664

 7,925

 8,443

 9,109

 9,588

 422

 432

 437

 443

 444

 445

 446

 448

 454

 451

 435

 417

 408

 403

 396

 389

 390

 391

 401

 412

 432

 457

 472

 492

 516

 536

 547

 566

 603

 651

 685

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER