alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE                ACT                RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, Dean E. Sukowatey, President of ICrystal, Inc. (the “Company”),                hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant                to                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying                report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, and filed                with                the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that the information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: March 21, 2007. | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. SukowateyPresident |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 06-20465

UNITY MARINE CORPORATION, INC. as owner of the M/V Carson for exoneration from or limitation of liability, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS
NEW AMITY SHIPPING, INC.; ASSOCIATED MARITIME CO., (HONG KONG) LTD.

Claimants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, for the following reasons, we are satisfied that the district court committed no reversible error:2

The record fullysupports the district court’s conclusion that this collision was caused through the sole fault of the NEW AMITY, her pilot and crew in (1) failing to keep out of the way of the CARSON, as required by Rule 13 of the Inland Rules, and (2) by traveling at an excessive rate of speed under the circumstances in violation of Rule 6. See Matter of Complaint of Luhr Bros., Inc., 157 F.3d 333, 338 (5th Cir. 1998) (“The appellate court must accept the district court's account of the evidence if it is plausible when viewed in light of the entire record. Moreover, where there
are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder's choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”) (citations omitted). Further, the district court did not err in allowing Unity’s expert to testifynor in accepting his testimony over the testimony of New Amity’s expert. Captain Scruton held an unlimited master’s license and had 16 years of seagoing experience, including experience aboard large tankers as well as aboard inland tugs. He testified that he had served aboard large vessels in narrow channels during passing situations and that he had observed first hand the general movements of large vessels engaged in turns. Given the similarityand relevance of these previous experiences to Captain Scruton’s testimony in this case, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony. See Watkins
v. Telsmity, Inc., 121 F.3d 984, 988 (5th Cir. 1997) (“District courts enjoy wide latitude in determining the admissibility of expert testimony, and the discretion of the trial judge and his or3

her decision will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly erroneous.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted). New Amity primarily challenges the credibility calls of the district court which is almost exclusively in the province of the trier of fact. See Luhr Bros., 157 F.3d at 337 (“Findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.”). AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERIC PAUL SMITH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 35004

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00126

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Frederic Paul Smith appeals pro se from the district court ’s judgment

dismissing on the basis of sovereign immunity his action against the United States

Postal Service (“USPS”) alleging that a USPS employee stole a sapphire he sent

through the U.S. mail. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C . § 1291

. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) (2). 

# FILED

DEC 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35004

de novo

. Harger v. Dep ’t of Labor , 569 F.3d 898 , 903 (9th Cir. 2009). We affir m.
The district court properly dismissed Smith’s action on the basis of

sovereign immunity b ecause the waiver of sovereign immunity under 28 U.S.C. §

1346(b) does not apply to “[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or

negligent transmission of letters or postal matter

. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (b); see also

28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (waiving United States sovereign immunity for certain tort

actions); Dolan v. U.S. Postal Serv

. , et al

. , 546 U.S. 481, 487 (2006) (discussing

meaning of “loss” under § 2680(b))

. Contrary to Smith’s contention
, the USPS did not waive its sovereign

immunity in its letter denying Smith’s administrative claim

. See Gilbert v.

DaGrossa
, 756 F.2d 1455 , 1460 n.6 (9th Cir. 1985) ( “A claim for damages against

a federal agency is barred by sovereign immunity unless Congress has consented to

suit.”)

. We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See

United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”)

.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
              OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Paramco
Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terrence Riely, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
         1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of the Company.

            A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



Date:  August 19, 2003        By: /s/ Terrrence Riely
                                  ----------------------
                              Terrence Riely
                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF FLAG TELECOM GROUP LIMITED

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the three months ended September 30, 2003 of FLAG Telecom Group Limited (the "Issuer").

I,
Alexander Gersh, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated:  November 14, 2003 |  |       |                
|------------------------- |  | ----- | ---------------
|                          |  |       |                
|                          |  | Name: | Alexander Gersh

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,352
<PP&E>                                           2,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 234 193 206 143

2 592 187 220 152

3 506 188 218 151

4 249 189 214 148

5 249 184 217 150

6 275 167 208 145

7 284 169 209 145

8 528 165 269 182

9 530 377 462 302

10 538 371 462 302

11 539 196 322 215

12 285 189 232 159

13 289 204 241 165

14 307 221 269 182

15 518 268 378 250

16 221 168 192 135

17 248 176 194 136

18 236 164 194 136

19 197 164 177 125

20 211 149 174 124

21 205 139 167 119

22 194 116 159 114

23 169 103 135 99

24 172 109 136 100

25 177 126 149 108

26 168 125 147 107

27 174 137 152 110

28 175 145 161 115

29 226 136 165 118

Total 6,429

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Run Date: 3/17/2024

February 2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, May 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, May 4, 2011, at 11 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy 
Shepard. For more information, please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-
1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, 
Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7538 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.43 Duration of permits.

A basic permit shall continue in effect until suspended, revoked, annulled, voluntarily surrendered, or automatically terminated, as provided in the Act and in this part.
Employment  Agreement by and between Registrant and Scott Sikora



 Exhibit 10.16 
 May 12, 2000 
 Scott Sikora 
 [Address] 
 Dear Scott: 
 On behalf of
AlertOnline, Inc. (the “Company”), this letter is offered to finalize your position of Co-President of the Company. You will maintain your position as the Co-President of the Company, working out of the Company’s headquarters
office in Seattle, WA. As President, you will report to the Company’s Board of Directors or Chief Executive Officer. You will be paid a monthly salary of $11458.33, which is equivalent to $137,500.00 on an annualized basis. Your salary will be
payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll policy (or in the same manner as other officers of the Company). 
 The Company
will provide you with standard medical and dental insurance benefits when they become available. In addition, the Company currently indemnifies all officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by law, and you will be requested to enter
into the Company’s standard form of Indemnification Agreement giving you such protection. Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, the Company will agree to advance any expenses for which indemnification is available to the extent allowed by
applicable law. 
 Your continued employment with the Company is contingent upon the execution, and delivery to the Company, of the
Company’s Proprietary Information and Invention Assignment Agreement, a copy of which is enclosed for your review and execution (the “Confidentiality Agreement”). 
 If your employment is terminated by the Company or its successor for any reason other than Cause (as defined in the Stock Restriction Agreement), you
will be entitled to receive continuation of your base salary and insurance benefits for four (4) months following the date of termination of your employment (“Severance Period”). Your entitlement to these severance benefits
will be conditioned upon your execution and delivery to the Company of (i) a general release of claims agreement, (ii) a resignation from all of your positions with the Company and (iii) an agreement not to engage directly or
indirectly or participate in any business or proposed business that is competitive in any manner with the business of the Company during the Severance Period. 
  








 May 11, 2000 
  Page
 2
 
  

 To indicate your acceptance of the Company’s offer, please sign and date this letter in the
space provided below and return it to me, along with a signed and dated copy of the Confidentiality Agreement. This letter, together with the Confidentiality Agreement, set forth the terms of your employment with the Company and supersede any prior
representations or agreements, whether written or oral. This letter may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement, signed by the Company and by you. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  
 ALERTONLINE, INC.

		
	By:	 	 
		
	Title:	 	 


 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 
  

	
	
	
	/s/ Scott Sikora
	Signature

  

	
	
	5/12/00
	Date

 Attachment A: Proprietary Information and Invention Assignment Agreement 
  

 - 2 - 








 Attachment A 
 Proprietary Information and Invention Assignment Agreement
#### Cream of Wheat Company, Appellant, *v.*American Home Magazine Company, Respondent.

First Department,

December 19, 1913.

See head note in *Cream of Wheat Co.*v. *American K. M. Co. {ante,*p. 761).

Appeal by the plaintiff, the Cream of Wheat Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of November, 1913, denying a motion for the extension of time to serve the complaint.

*Joseph J. Baker,*for the appellant.

*Clarence J. Shearn,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam :

The reversal of this order follows naturally upon the reversal of the order denying plaintiff’s motion for an inspection. *(Cream of Wheat Co.*v. *American H. M. Co.,*159 App. Div. *766761.) The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an extension of time to serve complaint granted.

Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Order to be settled on notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 398

 407

 412

 438

 409

 356

 350

 366

 390

 419

 433

 416

 398

 391

 423

 398

 403

 388

 377

 481

 530

 558

 576

 567

 531

 407

 435

 431

 405

 396

 386

 291

 296

 339

 325

 330

 319

 307

 315

 330

 367

 342

 368

 352

 347

 368

 353

 353

 351

 362

 380

 483

 511

 513

 464

 409

 367

 371

 395

 377

 378

 377

 320

 329

 378

 377

 361

 335

 321

 333

 361

 389

 390

 391

 372

 362

 380

 373

 376

 371

 369

 423

 505

 530

 541

 517

 465

 384

 395

 411

 389

 389

 382

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 214

 219

 250

 249

 239

 223

 214

 222

 239

 256

 257

 258

 246

 240

 251

 247

 248

 245

 244

 277

 328

 344

 350

 336

 303

 253

 260

 270

 256

 256

 252

TOTAL 12,219

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
March 2003 CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Green indicates Actual Delivery Data

Red indicates Scheduled Data Blue indicates Actual Data Deliveries on Behalf of CVC Contractors (75% Allocation)

Mar 

2003

Scheduled 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Scheduled 

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Scheduled 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Actual 

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss 

Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

3/1/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF No CVC Deliveries were made in Mar 2003

3/2/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/3/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/4/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/5/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/6/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/7/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/8/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/9/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/10/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/11/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/12/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/13/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/14/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/15/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/16/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/17/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/18/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/19/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/20/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/21/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/22/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/23/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/24/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/25/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/26/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/27/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/28/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/29/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/30/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

3/31/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Mar Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Notes: 

h:\data\public\~water\~smith\CVC\2003\2003 CVC Deliveries.xls 9/4/2003 11:00 AM