This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. 

# Rules and Regulations Federal Register 

### 27159

Vol. 79, No. 92

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Agricultural Marketing Service**

**7 CFR Part 925**

**[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0010; FV14–925–1 FR]** 

**Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased**  **Assessment Rate**

**AGENCY :**  Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule increases the assessment rate established for the California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) for the 2014 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0165 to $0.0200 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order, which regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. Assessments upon grape handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period began on January 1 and ends on December 31. The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: May 14, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487– 5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov

.

Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, grape handlers in a designated area of southeastern California are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein is applicable to all assessable grapes beginning on January 1, 2014, and will continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.

The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Committee for the 2014 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0165 to $0.0200 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled.

The grape order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. They are familiar with the Committee’s needs and with the costs of goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.

For the 2014 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA based upon a recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.

The Committee met on November 5, 2013, and unanimously recommended 2014 expenditures of $110,000 and an assessment rate of $0.0200 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. In comparison, last year’s budgeted expenditures were $100,000. The Committee recommended a crop estimate of 5,500,000 18-pound lugs, which is lower than the 5,800,000 18-pound lugs handled last year. The Committee also recommended carrying over a financial reserve of $49,000, which would increase to $59,000 if the contingency fund was not expended. The assessment rate of $0.0200 per 18- pound lug of grapes handled is $0.0035 higher than the $0.0165 rate currently in effect. The higher assessment rate, applied to shipments of 5,500,000 18- pound lugs, is expected to generate $110,000 in revenue and should be sufficient to cover the anticipated

expenses.

The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2014 fiscal period include $15,500 for research, $22,000 for general office expenses, $62,500 for management and compliance expenses, and $10,000 for a contingency reserve. The $15,500 research project is a continuation of a vine study in progress by the University of California, Riverside. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2013 fiscal period included $15,500 for research, $17,000 for general office expenses, and $67,500 for management and


### 27160 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

compliance expenses. Overall 2014 expenditures include a decrease in management and compliance expenses, an increase in general office expenses, and additional funds for the contingency reserve.

The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by evaluating several factors, including estimated shipments for the 2014 season, budgeted expenses, and the level of available financial reserves. The Committee determined that the $0.0200 assessment rate should generate $110,000 in revenue to cover the budgeted expenses of $110,000.

Reserve funds by the end of 2014 are projected to be $49,000 if the $10,000 added to the contingency fund is expended or $59,000 if it is not expended. Both amounts are well within the amount authorized under the order. Section 925.41 of the order permits the Committee to maintain approximately one fiscal period’s expenses in reserve.

The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA based upon a recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information.

Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate the Committee’s recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee’s 2014 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.

The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.

There are approximately 15 handlers of southeastern California grapes who are subject to regulation under the marketing order and about 41 grape producers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000. Ten of the 15 handlers subject to regulation have annual grape sales of less than $7,000,000, according to USDA Market News Service and Committee data. Based on information from the Committee and USDA’s Market News Service, it is estimated that at least 10 of the 41 producers have annual receipts of less than $750,000. Thus, it may be concluded that a majority of the grape handlers regulated under the order and about 10 of the producers could be classified as small entities under the Small Business Administration’s definitions.

This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from handlers for the 2014 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0165 to $0.0200 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The Committee unanimously recommended 2014 expenditures of $110,000 and an assessment rate of $0.0200 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The assessment rate of $0.0200 is $0.0035 higher than the 2013 rate currently in effect. The quantity of assessable grapes for the 2014 season is estimated at 5,500,000 18-pound lugs. Thus, the $0.0200 rate should generate $110,000 in income. In addition, reserve funds at the end of the year are projected to be $49,000, which is well within the order’s limitation of approximately one fiscal period’s

expenses.

The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2014 fiscal period include $15,500 for research, $22,000 for general office expenses, $62,500 for management and compliance expenses, and $10,000 for the contingency reserve. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2013 fiscal period included $15,500 for research, $17,000 for general office expenses, and $67,500 for management and compliance expenses. Overall expenditures included a decrease in management and compliance expenses, an increase in general office expenses, and funding of a contingency reserve.

Prior to arriving at this budget, the Committee considered alternative expenditures and assessment rates, including not increasing the $0.0165 assessment rate currently in effect. Based on a crop estimate of 5,500,000 18-pound lugs, the Committee ultimately determined that increasing the assessment rate to $0.0200 would generate sufficient funds to cover budgeted expenses. Reserve funds at the end of the 2014 fiscal period are projected to be $49,000 if the $10,000 contingency fund is expended or $59,000 if it is not expended. These amounts are well within the amount authorized under the order.

A review of historical crop and price information, as well as preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period, indicates that the producer price for the 2013 season averaged about $16.20 per 18-pound lug of California grapes handled. Utilizing the estimate and the assessment rate of $0.0200, estimated assessment revenue as a percentage of total estimated producer revenue would be 0.12 percent for the 2014 season ($0.0200 divided by $16.20 per 18-pound lug). Thus, the assessment revenue should be well below 1 percent of estimated producer revenue in 2014.

This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs should be offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the marketing order. In addition, the Executive Subcommittee and the Committee’s meetings were widely publicized throughout the grape production area, and all interested persons were invited to attend and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the November 5, 2013, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.

This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California grape


### 27161 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this final rule.

AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2014 (79 FR 17940). Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all grape handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 15-day comment period ending on April 15, 2014, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received.

A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide

. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously mentioned address in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 2014 fiscal period began on January 1, 2014, and the order requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to all assessable grapes handled during such fiscal period; (2) the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are incurred on a continuous basis; (3) handlers are aware of this action, which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years; and (4) a 15-day comment period was provided for in the proposed rule, and no comments were received. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is amended as follows:

**PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF**  **SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA**

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 925 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

■ 2. Section 925.215 is revised to read as follows:

**§ 925.215 Assessment rate.**

On and after January 1, 2014, an assessment rate of $0.0200 per 18-pound lug is established for grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California.

Dated: May 7, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc. 2014–10988 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY** 

**8 CFR Parts 103 and 235**

**[Docket No. USCBP–2013–0029: CBP Decision No. 14–05]** 

**RIN 1651–AB01**

**The U.S. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Travel Card**  **Program**

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. DHS.

**ACTION :**  Interim final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This interim final rule establishes the U.S. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Travel Card Program. APEC is aneconomic forum comprised of twentyone members, including the United States, whose primary goal is to support sustainable economic growth and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region. One of APEC’s initiatives is the APEC Business Travel Card Program. The U.S. APEC Business Travel Card Program will provide qualified U.S. business travelers engaged in business in the APEC region or U.S. Government officials actively engaged in APEC business the ability to access fast-track immigration lanes at participating airports in foreign APEC economies. This rule sets forth the parameters of the program, the eligibility requirements, the application procedures, the duration of the program and the fee. In accordance with the authorizing law, DHS will not issue any new U.S. APEC Business Travel Cards or renew any U.S. APEC Business Travel Cards after September 30, 2018. Unless the law is amended to extend the duration of the U.S. APEC Business Travel Card Program, all U.S. APEC Business Travel Cards will expire by September 29,

2021.

**DATES :**  This interim final rule is effective on June 12, 2014. Comments must be received on or before June 12,

2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by docket number USCBP– 2013–0029, by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Border Security Regulations Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 90 K Street NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–

1177.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket title for this rulemaking, and must reference docket number USCBP– 2013–0029. All comments received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of the document.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments may also be inspected during regular business days between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of International Trade, Customs and Border Protection, 90 K Street NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325–0118.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. David Sanchez, Office of Field Operations, (202) 344–1004, David.Sanchez@cbp.dhs.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Table of Contents

I. Public Participation II. Background