alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT

TO

COGNEX CORPORATION

1998 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN



A. The Cognex Corporation 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby
amended by adding the following sentence at the end of Section 2:





“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares of Common Stock
otherwise available for issuance under this Plan is hereby reduced
by 10,250 shares.”


B. Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.




C. This Amendment is effective as of July 26, 2007.




     Executed this 14th day of August, 2007, by and on behalf of Cognex Corporation by
its duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COGNEX CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Anthony J. Medaglia, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Anthony J. Medaglia, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 459

 468

 469

 447

 439

 426

 429

 429

 472

 482

 513

 532

 543

 571

 547

 440

 448

 529

 512

 473

 516

 502

 513

 561

 525

 524

 511

 497

 549

 558

 427

 435

 407

 401

 394

 393

 394

 383

 385

 393

 379

 374

 363

 358

 363

 389

 402

 407

 390

 386

 417

 398

 404

 373

 376

 356

 354

 358

 361

 360

 438

 447

 431

 414

 412

 410

 405

 404

 409

 422

 422

 412

 415

 421

 407

 417

 425

 455

 440

 432

 451

 430

 439

 446

 445

 407

 401

 408

 417

 420

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 19, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 287

 292

 282

 272

 271

 269

 266

 266

 269

 277

 277

 271

 272

 276

 268

 274

 279

 297

 288

 283

 295

 282

 287

 292

 291

 268

 264

 268

 274

 276

TOTAL 12,702

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### In the Matter of the Proving of the Last Will and Testament of Rufus L. Fiske, Deceased. Frances Eliza Young, Appellant; Isabel Fiske Clarke, Respondent.

Decree affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
exv10w6



 





Exhibit 10.6




TERMINATION AGREEMENT

(AIRCRAFT LEASE AGREEMENT)



THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Termination Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of
the 31st day of October, 2007, between Capitaline Flight Services, LLC a South Dakota
limited liability company, with its principal office in Brookings, South Dakota (“Lessor”); and US
BioEnergy Corporation, a South Dakota corporation, with its principal office in Inver Grove
Heights, Minnesota, (“Lessee”).




     A. Lessor and Lessee are parties to that certain Aircraft Lease Agreement, September 20, 2007
(the “Aircraft Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which Lessor leased to Lessee on an hourly basis that
certain 2007 Cessna T206H Turbo Stationair, NAV III, Manufacturer’s Serial Number T20608758,
Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) Registration Mark N2451A, and the appliances,
communications equipment, accessories, instruments and other items of equipment installed thereon
(the “Aircraft’) to Lessee, and Lessee leased the Aircraft from Lessor on such hourly basis; and



     B. The parties have mutually agreed to terminate the Aircraft Lease Agreement in accordance
with the terms and conditions set forth below.



     For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows:



     1. The Aircraft Lease Agreement is terminated effective October 31, 2007 (the “Termination
Date”), and all obligations of Lessor to Lessee and all rights and obligations of Lessee as to the
Aircraft pursuant to the Aircraft Lease Agreement shall immediately cease and terminate; provided
that the following provisions of the Aircraft Lease Agreement shall survive the Termination Date:
(a) Paragraph 4.a., with respect to Lessee’s obligation to remove any liens place on the Aircraft
as a result of Lessee’s actions or inactions under the Aircraft Lease Agreement; (b) Paragraph 5,
with respect to any actions or inactions of Lessee in connection with the registration of the
Aircraft; (c) Paragraph 6, with respect to the obligations of either party to be responsible for or
reimburse the other party for costs or expenses in connection with maintenance, repairs and
inspections of the Aircraft., and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the
Aircraft Documents; and (d) Paragraphs 8.b. and 8.c..



     2. Lessee shall remain liable to the Lessor for any arrears in Rent or other amounts due under
the Aircraft Lease Agreement with respect to events or circumstances arising under the Aircraft
Lease Agreement or in connection with Lessee’s lease and use of the Aircraft, in each case prior to
the Termination Date.



     In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Termination Agreement as of the date first
set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lessor:	 	 	 	Lessee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Capitaline Flight Services, LLC	 	 	 	US BioEnergy Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jill L. Wilts	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Gregory S. Schlicht	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	VP 	 	 	 	Title:	 	VP, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary
§ 644.1 What is the Educational Opportunity Centers program? The Educational Opportunity Centers program provides grants for projects designed— ( a ) To provide information regarding financial and academic assistance available to individuals who desire to pursue a program of postsecondary education;
( b ) To provide assistance to individuals in applying to admission to institutions that offer programs of postsecondary education, including assistance in preparing necessary applications for use by admissions and financial aid officers; and
( c ) To improve the financial and economic literacy of participants on topics such as— ( 1 ) Basic personal income, household money management, and financial planning skills; and
( 2 ) Basic economic decision-making skills.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-16)
[59 FR 2658, Jan. 18, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 65780, Oct. 26, 2010]
05 -tu**ooz_Jw ae.** 

_ ()_fL · : 

### fl tU 1 

# 2 Jwf-.

## ~ aJnlt:J --frJ 

# And n

# Y/u_**~** 

# ? !fJf

# ~**~** . "f(kt · 

# '"c:rr-J mrf 

## M 

# 2f 7-o fwd 

### <}6**~u&- w~f1b**  M 

### vJ , fh 

# m/.**~?** 

### ;f I

### w~ uJ[Jh_/d

### ~ 

### '-fhL 

### LnJI 

## J CJLdltf/Z?

. 

### l

## ~r**~~)** rru_ 

### IA{ofdJ. Q_ +riA) I**~ ·** **~tj** 1f\**Wl~ pr~u** **.**

RE"ce.rveo Court of Appeals NAY 0 7 2015

Lisa Matz Clerk, 5th District 

# J.-· - · -· -· -· -· -· -
-

-

-

- - -· -·

- -·
§ 463.135 What are the requirements for modification of the Unified State Plan? ( a ) In addition to the required modification review set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a Governor may submit a modification of its Unified State Plan at any time during the 4-year period of the plan.
( b ) Modifications are required, at a minimum: ( 1 ) At the end of the first 2-year period of any 4-year State Plan, wherein the State WDB must review the Unified State Plan, and the Governor must submit modifications to the plan to reflect changes in labor market and economic conditions or other factors affecting the implementation of the Unified State Plan;
( 2 ) When changes in Federal or State law or policy substantially affect the strategies, goals, and priorities upon which the Unified State Plan is based;
( 3 ) When there are changes in the statewide vision, strategies, policies, State negotiated levels of performance as described in § 463.170(b), the methodology used to determine local allocation of funds, reorganizations that change the working relationship with system employees, changes in organizational responsibilities, changes to the membership structure of the State WDB or alternative entity, and similar substantial changes to the State's workforce development system.
( c ) Modifications to the Unified State Plan are subject to the same public review and comment requirements in § 463.130(d) that apply to the development of the original Unified State Plan.
( d ) Unified State Plan modifications must be approved by the Secretaries of Labor and Education, based on the approval standards applicable to the original Unified State Plan under § 463.130. This approval must come after the approval of the Commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration for modification of any portion of the plan described in sec. 102(b)(2)(D)(iii) of WIOA.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                             DAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David A. Collins
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                       /s/ David A. Collins
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2003
| 1. | American                Federal Mining Group, Inc  (AFMG.) |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Wulatehouqi                Qianzhen Ore Processing Co., Ltd øQianzhen                Mining÷ |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Inner                Mongolia Xiangzhen Mining Group Co., Ltd  (Xiangzhen                Mining) |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Xinjiang                Buerjin County Xingzhen Mining Co. Ltd  (Xingzhen                Mining) |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | Wulatehouqi                Qingshan Nonferrous Metal Development Co.                Ltd |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | Kyrgyz                Tunlin Limited Liability Company                (Tunlin) |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 7. | Kyrgyz                Kichi-Chaarat Company                (Kichi-Chaarat) |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
(No. 76-CV-0484

#### In Re Application of Gbolahan R. Ajayi

*Order filed January 29, 1978.*

Poch, J.

This claim arises out of a criminal offense which occurred on or about the eighth day of September, 1975. Claimant seeks compensation pursuant to the applicable provisions of Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70, Sec. 71, et. seq. (“Crime Victims Compensation Act”, hereinafter referred to as the Act).

*407The claim was filed on or about the 26th day of November, 1975. Thereafter, based upon the investigatory report submitted by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois and the other documentary evidence, the Court rendered its opinion on or about the 28th day of July, 1978. Claimant filed his objection to said opinion and requested a full hearing on the merits.

The hearing was conducted by Commissioner Leo J. Spivack on the 25th day of October, 1978, at Chicago, Illinois. As a result of said hearing the following facts were established by a preponderance of the evidence:

(1) Claimant, Gbolahan R. Ajayi, was a victim of a violent crime, as defined in Section 2(c) of the Act, to-wit: “Aggravated Battery.”

(2) Claimant has complied with all pertinent provisions of the Act and qualifies for compensation thereunder.

(3) Claimant incurred no medical and/or hospital expenses, all having been paid or reimbursed by insurance.

(4) Claimant had been employed for one week prior to the crime and his earnings for said week were about $300.00. Prior to the said date of crime, to-wit: September 8,1975, Claimant had been unemployed for a period of about seven months, having been last employed on February 18, 1975.

(5) Claimant was disabled from September 8,1975, to January, 1976, at which time he matriculated as a full-time student at Northwestern University.

(6) As a result of the occurrence, Claimant received the following deductible benefits:

(a) Industrial Commission Award $5,000.00

*408(b) Disability benefits from his employer, at the rate of $571.00 monthly 6,952.18

Total: $11,952.18

which said deductible benefits exceed any possible award payable under the Act.

It is hereby ordered that based upon the finding of fact the Order of July 28,1978, will remain in full force and effect inasmuch as'the deductible benefits already received by Claimant exceed any award to which he would be entitled under the Act.
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

, Attachments: 

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 

Hi All, 

•··:1 1"\R+MEi'l+ QF . ::.:\t·.JSPORTATI0!\1 

Adams, Kevm (OST) , . · ·•·:,; fiPf.DATJ'"Ii\10 

Monday, October 15,2012 2:~i''p~.__., '- 111 .. ~),\•J 

'Zane, C. J.'; steve.hatter@']lf¥~-flOV,; Jber~ki~~r.lcet·net; Scontras, Katherine; 

akutanadmin@gci.net; ricH.sew~ll@~l&sk~·~goJ, H~d'a.bustamante@alaska.gov; 

rebecca.cronkhite@alaska.gov; robert.e.lochmann@usps.gov; joy.c.doby@usps.gov; 

Congressional, Murkowski, Warren Wright (Warren_Wright@murkowski.senate.gov) 

ScottB@penair.com; patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com; robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com; 

Dockets Mail; BMcGiasson@FiyGrant.com; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Request for Comment regarding EAS proposal 

Proposal of Grant Aviation.pdf 

Attached above is a copy of Grant Aviation's proposals for subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) at Akun, Alaska. We are 

currently reviewing that proposal. The proposal is directly from the carrier and is reflected in the Docket, which you may 

access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-2000-7068, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. We 

received no other proposals in response to our request for proposals, Order 2012-8-39. Community comments are a 

critically important element in our carrier-selection decision. We ask that you get back to us, preferably by email, no 

later than November 8, 2012. We will docket this email, as well as any replies. 

In brief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me or the carrier, and get back to DOT by the November 

8 deadline. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,416

 4,427

 5,450

 5,096

 4,708

 2,947

 3,146

 3,069

 3,482

 2,808

 2,894

 3,080

 4,057

 3,893

 6,029

 6,313

 7,771

 8,446

 8,863

 6,904

 5,094

 4,558

 4,983

 4,978

 6,315

 5,859

 7,169

 6,598

 6,226

 8,102

 7,318

 481

 473

 486

 613

 483

 374

 381

 451

 344

 344

 417

 403

 375

 432

 490

 585

 541

 539

 977

 758

 503

 591

 507

 752

 1,066

 1,307

 1,346

 945

 829

 626

 790

 1,608

 1,690

 1,882

 2,331

 2,106

 1,457

 1,276

 1,277

 1,193

 1,080

 963

 1,091

 1,381

 1,787

 2,183

 2,530

 2,964

 3,660

 4,040

 3,372

 2,407

 2,316

 2,656

 2,854

 3,077

 3,220

 3,887

 3,373

 3,406

 3,772

 4,133

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 20,203

 20,531

 21,050

 21,940

 22,548

 22,751

 22,845

 22,801

 22,558

 22,208

 21,812

 21,404

 20,980

 21,122

 21,697

 22,537

 23,619

 24,948

 26,882

 28,797

 29,928

 30,967

 32,430

 34,204

 36,318

 38,447

 40,953

 42,539

 43,762

 45,004

 46,173

 1,443

 1,467

 1,504

 1,567

 1,611

 1,625

 1,632

 1,629

 1,611

 1,586

 1,558

 1,529

 1,499

 1,509

 1,550

 1,610

 1,687

 1,782

 1,920

 2,057

 2,138

 2,212

 2,316

 2,443

 2,594

 2,746

 2,925

 3,039

 3,126

 3,215

 3,298

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Summary of Compensation of the Non-Employee Members of the Board of Directors



 Exhibit 10(b) 
 PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION 
 SUMMARY OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NON-EMPLOYEE MEMBERS

 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
 Adopted August 16, 2007, effective October 1, 2007 
  

				
	 Annual retainer for Audit Committee Chair:
	  	$	102,500
		
	 Annual retainer for Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair:
	  	$	97,500
		
	 Annual retainer for each of the Chairs of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Finance Committee:
	  	$	92,500
		
	 Annual retainer for Non-Chair Committee members:
	  	$	87,500

 Meeting fees of $1,500 for attending any Board or Committee meeting during any fiscal year in excess of the number
of regularly scheduled Board or Committee meetings by more than two. 
 Annual restricted stock grant
Editorial Note on Part 674
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 674 appear at 65 FR 18002, 18003, Apr. 6, 2000.

§ 674.46 Litigation procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) If the collection efforts described in § 674.45 do not result in the repayment of a loan, the institution shall determine at least once every two years whether— ( i ) The total amount owing on the borrower's account, including outstanding principal, accrued interest, collection costs and late charges on all of the borrower's Federal Perkins, NDSL and National Defense Student Loans held by that institution, is more than $500;
( ii ) The borrower can be located and served with process;
( iii ) ( A ) The borrower has sufficient assets attachable under State law to satisfy a major portion of the oustanding debt; or
( B ) The borrower has income from wages or salary which may be garnished under applicable State law sufficient to satisfy a major portion of the debt over a reasonable period of time;
( iv ) The borrower does not have a defense that will bar judgment for the institution; and
( v ) The expected cost of litigation, including attorney's fees, does not exceed the amount which can be recovered from the borrower.
( 2 ) The institution shall sue the borrower if it determines that the conditions in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are met.
( 3 ) The institution may sue a borrower in default, even if the conditions in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are not met.
( b ) The institution shall assess against and attempt to recover from the borrower— ( 1 ) All litigation costs, including attorney's fees, court costs and other related costs, to the extent permitted under applicable law; and
( 2 ) All prior collection costs incurred and not yet paid by the borrower.
( c ) ( 1 ) An institution shall ensure that any funds collected as a result of litigation procedures are— ( i ) Deposited in interest-bearing bank accounts that are— ( A ) Insured by an agency of the Federal Government; or
( B ) Secured by collateral of reasonably equivalent value; or
( ii ) Invested in low-risk income-producing securities, such as obligations issued or guaranteed by the United States.
( 2 ) An institution shall exercise the level of care required of a fiduciary with regard to these deposits and investments.
( d ) If the institution is unable to collect the full amount owing on the loan after following the procedures set forth in §§ 674.41 through 674.46, the institution may— ( 1 ) Submit the account to the Secretary for assignment in accordance with the procedures in § 674.50; or
( 2 ) With the Secretary's approval, refer the account to the Department for collection.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 424, 1087cc)
[52 FR 45555, Nov. 30, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 61412, 61415, Nov. 30, 1994; 67 FR 67077, Nov. 1, 2002]
#### § 234.3 Aircraft; how considered.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Immigration and Nationality Act and this chapter, aircraft arriving in or departing from the continental United States or Alaska directly from or to foreign contiguous territory or the French island of St. Pierre or Miquelon shall be regarded for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act and this chapter as other transportation lines or companies arriving or departing over the land borders of the United States.

[22 FR 9795, Dec. 6, 1957. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 10353, Mar. 6, 1997]
#### Edgar E. MOHWINKEL, Appellant, v. NORTHWEST HYDROGAS COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 15321.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 18, 1955.

John P. Ryan, St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.

Meagher, Geer, Markham & Anderson, Minneapolis, Minn., and Spence & Green, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed for want' of prosecution, on motion of appellant.
Exhibit 23.2




Consent of JBPB & Co., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Board of Directors:


American Dairy, Inc


(now known as Feihe International, Inc.)




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-123932, effective April 7, 2005) of American Dairy, Inc (now known as Feihe International, Inc) of our report dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of American Dairy, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and all related financial statements schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Feihe International, Inc.







/s/ JBPB & Co.





JBPB & Co. (formerly known as Grant Thornton)




March 31, 2011