alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1341. Interference with functions of Commission

#### (a) Interfering with or influencing the Commission or its employees

It shall be unlawful for any person (1) to prevent or attempt to prevent, by force, intimidation, threat, or in any other manner, any member or employee of the commission from exercising the functions imposed upon the commission by this subtitle, or (2) to induce, or attempt to induce, by like means any such member or employee to make any decision or order, or to take any action, with respect to any matter within the authority of the commission.

#### (b) Penalty

Any person who violates any of the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

#### (c) "Person" defined

As used in this section the term "person" includes an individual, corporation, association, partnership, or any other organization or group of individuals.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title III, §341, 46 Stat. 707.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 225

 244

 231

 230

 223

 211

 212

 171

 162

 176

 186

 191

 199

 205

 219

 226

 250

 251

 252

 235

 193

 178

 171

 147

 145

 153

 143

 148

 144

 214

 211

 209

 205

 206

 194

 164

 153

 153

 159

 174

 184

 190

 196

 203

 208

 216

 218

 215

 138

 129

 128

 116

 123

 124

 126

 125

 112

 117

 220

 218

 215

 213

 210

 205

 186

 161

 157

 166

 180

 188

 194

 200

 208

 214

 224

 225

 228

 198

 159

 148

 144

 139

 133

 136

 133

 124

 126

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,076

 3,097

 3,107

 3,109

 3,102

 3,087

 3,049

 2,985

 2,917

 2,857

 2,810

 2,771

 2,738

 2,713

 2,701

 2,697

 2,706

 2,718

 2,736

 2,729

 2,702

 2,689

 2,676

 2,649

 2,602

 2,550

 2,489

 2,413

 2,331

 220

 221

 222

 222

 222

 221

 218

 213

 208

 204

 201

 198

 196

 194

 193

 193

 193

 194

 195

 195

 193

 192

 191

 189

 186

 182

 178

 172

 167

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 99.34 What conditions apply to disclosure of information to other educational agencies or institutions? ( a ) An educational agency or institution that discloses an education record under § 99.31(a)(2) shall: ( 1 ) Make a reasonable attempt to notify the parent or eligible student at the last known address of the parent or eligible student, unless: ( i ) The disclosure is initiated by the parent or eligible student; or
( ii ) The annual notification of the agency or institution under § 99.7 includes a notice that the agency or institution forwards education records to other agencies or institutions that have requested the records and in which the student seeks or intends to enroll or is already enrolled so long as the disclosure is for purposes related to the student's enrollment or transfer;
( 2 ) Give the parent or eligible student, upon request, a copy of the record that was disclosed; and
( 3 ) Give the parent or eligible student, upon request, an opportunity for a hearing under subpart C.
( b ) An educational agency or institution may disclose an education record of a student in attendance to another educational agency or institution if: ( 1 ) The student is enrolled in or receives services from the other agency or institution; and
( 2 ) The disclosure meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1232g(b)(1)(B))
[53 FR 11943, Apr. 11, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 59297, Nov. 21, 1996; 73 FR 74854, Dec. 9, 2008]
EXHIBIT 23.2

Deloitte



INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Herley  Industries,  Inc.  on Form S-8  [File  numbers  333-145503,  333-121554,
333-71476,  333-95327,  333-46777 and  333-17369] of our report dated October 2,
2009, with respect to our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements and
related  consolidated  financial  statement schedule of General Microwave Israel
and  Subsidiary  as of August 2, 2009 and for the  fifty-two  (52)  weeks  ended
August  2,  2009  appearing  in  this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  of  Herley
Industries, Inc. for the fifty-two (52) weeks ended August 2, 2009.



/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar
Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Jerusalem, Israel

October 14, 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

PD

- 0096

- 15

MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS, § Appellant § On Petition for Review of

v. § No. 14 -13- 00 527- CR § Court of Appeals § Fourteenth District of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee

PETITIONER/APPELLANT ’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Petitioner/Appellant Michael Jermaine Williams moves for a second extension

of time to file his petition for discretionary review, under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b).

I. LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS

Judgment in this case was entered on June 7, 2013

. The court of appeals

affirmed on December 23, 2014. No motion for rehearing was filed.

II. PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT

Mr. Williams ’s petition was due on March 24, 2015. Two previous extensions

were requested and granted. The petition and appendix were filed today, March 27,

2015.

III. REASONS FOR REQUEST

Since the first extension in this case, counsel has been working hard to catch up

on her docket after missing nearly a month of work due to recurrent medical

problems and multiple doctors’ appointments and tests. Counsel reassigned some of PD-0096-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/27/2015 3:22:06 PM Accepted 3/31/2015 2:14:48 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2

her cases to other attorneys in the office, and this month, completed and filed a brief

in the case of Reginald Turon Hill v. State , Cause No. 14

- 14

- 00376

- CR, which was

subject to abatement; and a petition for discretionary review in the case of Charles

Henry Jones v. State , Cause No. PD

- 0174

- 15. Counsel also has deadlines in the next two

weeks for the following: petition for discreti onary review in John Elsworth Combest v.

State , Cause No. 01

- 13

- 00712

- CR; brief in In re M.I.S. , Cause No. 01

- 14

- 00684

- CV;

and brief in Nomathemba Y. Sitawisha v. State , Cause No. 01

- 14

- 00848

- CR. In the

exercise of due diligence, counsel could not complete Mr. Williams’ petition by the

deadline. This motion is not filed for purposes of delay, but so justice may be done.

PRAYER

Mr. Williams respectfully requests that this motion be granted and that the

Court permit an extension of time until March 2 7 , 2015

, to fil e his petition for

discretionary review

.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN Chief Public Defender Harris County Texas

/s/ Cheri Duncan

___________________

___________ CHERI DUNCAN Assistant Public Defender Harris County Texas S tate Bar No. 06210500 1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor Houston Texas 770023 (713) 368

- 0016 (713) 368

- 9278 (Fax) cheri.duncan@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Petitioner/ Appellant, MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellate

Brief was served on the State of Texas by electronic delivery to the A ppellate Division

of the H arris County District Attorney’s Office and the State Prosecuting Attorney

,

on March 2 7 , 2015

. /s/ Cheri Duncan

_________________________ CHERI DUNCAN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Scheduling of council meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Hispanic Council on Federal Employment will hold its second meeting on April 15, 2011, at the time and location shown below. The Council is an advisory committee composed of representatives from Hispanic organizations and senior government officials. Along with its other responsibilities, the Council shall advise the Director of the Office of Personnel Management on matters involving the recruitment, hiring, and advancement of Hispanics in the Federal workforce. The Council is co-chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Office of Personnel Management and the Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The meeting is open to the public. Please contact the Office of Personnel Management at the address shown below if you wish to present material to the Council at the meeting. The manner and time prescribed for presentations may be limited, depending upon the number of parties that express interest in presenting information.

# DATES:

April 15, 2011 from 2-4 p.m.

*Location:*                         U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 1416, 1st Floor, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E St., NW., Washington, DC 20415.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Veronica E. Villalobos, Director for the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St., NW., Suite 5305, Washington, DC 20415. Phone (202) 606-2984 FAX (202) 606-2183 or e-mail at                         *Edgar.Gonzalez@opm.gov.*

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

John Berry, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 2011-7830 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-46-P
### §1710. Theft of newspapers

Whoever, being a Postal Service officer or employee, takes or steals any newspaper or package of newspapers from any post office or from any person having custody thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 780; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(20), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §319 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §196, 35 Stat. 1126).

Theft provisions alone are retained in this section. Those relating to other offenses were incorporated in section 1703 of this title.

Words "mail or" following "steals any" were omitted as covered by section 1709 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $100".

1970—Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "Postal Service officer or employee" for "postmaster or Postal Service employee".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 473

 592

 623

 585

 515

 582

 714

 1,029

 1,040

 1,253

 1,681

 1,381

 1,766

 1,937

 2,326

 2,330

 2,953

 2,642

 2,734

 3,042

 3,336

 3,538

 3,904

 3,848

 3,421

 3,200

 3,170

 2,781

 3,440

 3,267

 3,896

 313

 318

 315

 309

 303

 304

 308

 311

 315

 324

 324

 321

 323

 338

 369

 373

 406

 357

 391

 432

 391

 429

 412

 454

 412

 458

 522

 502

 525

 581

 586

 346

 381

 367

 359

 352

 365

 399

 442

 459

 515

 526

 446

 554

 668

 855

 868

 1,051

 985

 1,100

 1,249

 1,356

 1,468

 1,454

 1,373

 1,239

 1,299

 1,438

 1,313

 1,415

 1,673

 1,746

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 4,101

 4,252

 4,373

 4,480

 4,566

 4,652

 4,761

 4,909

 5,084

 5,308

 5,522

 5,647

 5,860

 6,179

 6,688

 7,175

 7,859

 8,485

 9,233

 10,117

 11,074

 12,100

 13,095

 13,953

 14,666

 15,519

 16,403

 17,048

 17,608

 18,413

 19,108

 293

 304

 312

 320

 326

 332

 340

 351

 363

 379

 394

 403

 419

 441

 478

 513

 561

 606

 660

 723

 791

 864

 935

 997

 1,048

 1,109

 1,172

 1,218

 1,258

 1,315

 1,365

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

CHERYLANDA LEE ANNE GARDNER

 Case No. 18-10379-BFK

 Debtor

AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS 

Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, amends his previously filed Motion to 

Dismiss to include the following additional ground for dismissal: 

 Based on the allegations of a Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Debtor’s 

 mortgage lender (Dkt. #39) she has failed to make her May-July, 2020 

 mortgage payments, which if true would be a default under Section 6B of her 

 confirmed Plan.

Date: __July 29, 2020______ __/s/ Thomas P. Gorman______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

 300 N. Washington Street, #400 

 Alexandria, VA 22314 

 (703) 836-2226 

 VSB 26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 29th day of July, 2020, served via ECF to authorized 

users or mailed a true copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss, Notice of Motion and 

Notice of Hearing to the following parties. 

Cherylanda Lee Anne Gardner 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

56 Sanctuary Lane 

Stafford, VA 22554 

John C. Morgan, Jr., Esquire 

Attorney for Debtor 

New Day Legal, PLLC 

98 Alexandria Pike, Ste. 10 

Warrenton, VA 20186 

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman_____ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 18-10379-BFK Doc 42 Filed 07/29/20 Entered 07/29/20 09:29:42 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
The Aristotle Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements File No. 333-41845 (Registration Rights Agreement) on Form S-3, and File No. 333-41841 (1997 Employee and Director Stock Plan), File No. 333-108803 (1997 Employee and Director Stock Plan), and File No. 333-108802 (2002 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan) on Form S-8 of The Aristotle Corporation of our report dated February 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of The Aristotle Corporation and subsidiaries (Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of The Aristotle Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 29, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 277

 252

 253

 233

 250

 243

 256

 272

 231

 236

 247

 252

 266

 262

 255

 258

 258

 264

 256

 273

 265

 278

 276

 297

 278

 282

 283

 285

 333

 407

 445

 224

 216

 219

 211

 214

 223

 226

 216

 203

 210

 223

 235

 244

 240

 241

 233

 238

 247

 245

 242

 242

 244

 238

 242

 249

 248

 249

 249

 252

 259

 263

 243

 231

 230

 220

 225

 233

 241

 238

 216

 222

 230

 243

 251

 249

 247

 250

 251

 253

 249

 251

 250

 253

 252

 256

 254

 255

 258

 258

 268

 288

 289

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,582

 3,587

 3,585

 3,568

 3,547

 3,529

 3,513

 3,492

 3,445

 3,391

 3,349

 3,314

 3,288

 3,272

 3,276

 3,295

 3,316

 3,349

 3,373

 3,391

 3,400

 3,415

 3,451

 3,485

 3,509

 3,521

 3,528

 3,537

 3,558

 3,596

 3,634

 256

 256

 256

 255

 253

 252

 251

 249

 246

 242

 239

 237

 235

 234

 234

 235

 237

 239

 241

 242

 243

 244

 247

 249

 251

 252

 252

 253

 254

 257

 260

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 31.2   CERTIFICATION I, Steven Jiao, certify that:    1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;   4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have;   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and   5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  By:  /s/ Steven JiaoSteven Jiao
Chief Financial Officer
April 17, 2007
May 6, 2015

Mr. Alex Nikle

408 Roberts Street Apt. 414

Fargo, ND 58102

Dear Mr. Nikle:

We have received your April 23, 2015, correspondence withdrawing your December 29, 2014,

petition for an exemption from § 61.35(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2014-1011-0005). No further 

action will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
#### Michael T. Bohman, appellant, v. Charles H. Chase et al., appellees.

Filed June 21, 1899.

No. 8954.

Transcript for Review. In an appeal to this court the certified transcript must include the judgment or decree of the trial court.

Appeal from the district court of Colfax county. Heard below before Marshall, J.

*Dismissed.*

*George R. Doughty*and *George II. Thomas,*for appellant

*G. J. Phelps, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

The record filed in this court in this action has attached a certificate of the clerk of the trial court, to the effect that it contains copies of “all the pleadings” in the cause. There is no certified judgment or decree. This being true, it is not presented here in such a condition as will admit of an examination of the coiTectness of the decision in the district court. Section 675 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as follows: “That in all actions in equity either party may appeal from the judgment or decree rendered or final order made by the district court to the supreme court of the state; the party appealing shall, within six months after fixe date of the rendition of the judgment or decree, or the making of the final order, procure from the clerk of the district court and file in the office of the clerk of the supreme court a cer*713tilled transcript of the proceedings had in the cause in the district court, containing the pleadings, the judgment, or decree rendered or final order made therein, and all the depositions, testimony, and proofs offered in evidence on the hearing of the cause, and have the said cause properly docketed in the supreme court; and on failing thereof, the judgment or decree rendered or final order made in the district court shall stand and be proceeded in as if no appeal had been taken.” This requires that there shall be embodied in a transcript in an appeal to this court the judgment or decree of the trial court, and the certificate to the transcript must generally or in terms embrace the judgment or decree. *(Moore v. Waterman,*40 Neb. 498; *Bell v. Beller,*40 Neb. 501; *McDonald v. Grabow,*46 Neb. 406.) The appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.