alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 371

 368

 389

 386

 375

 353

 340

 338

 340

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 313

 322

 323

 325

 329

 317

 304

 299

 314

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 344

 349

 358

 368

 358

 340

 329

 327

 332

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 9, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 229

 232

 237

 243

 237

 226

 219

 218

 221

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TOTAL 3,105

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Appendix H

Air Quality Calculations 
Formulas and Assumptions for Calculation of 

Dust Particle Emissions during Project Operation 

To estimate the amount of dust generated from the traffic during the Operation phase of the 

Project, calculations using EPA Emission Factors for unpaved and paved roads were made. 

Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I (EPA, 2006) contains the following 

equation for light-duty vehicles traveling on publicly accessible unpaved roads (Equation 1b in 

the document): 

where k, a, c and d are empirical constants provided in the document and: 

x E = size-specific emission factor in pounds per vehicle mile traveled (lb/VMT), 

x s = surface material silt content (percent), 

x M = surface material moisture content (percent), 

x S = mean vehicle speed (mph), and 

x C = emission factor for 1980s vehicle fleet exhaust, brake wear, and tire wear. 

To account for rainfall, which naturally mitigates dust generation, the following equation was 

then applied: 

Eext = E [(365-P)/365] 

where: 

x Eext = annual size-specific emission factor extrapolated for natural mitigation (lb/VMT); 

x E = emission factor from Equation above; and 

x P = number of days in a year with at least 0.01 inches (0.254 millimeters) of 

precipitation. 

)LQDO(,6/RVW&UHHN8UDQLXP,Q6LWX5HFRYHU\3URMHFW9ROXPH,, $SSHQGL[+ +
For paved roads, the following formula was used: 

where: 

x Eext = annual or other long-term average emission factor in the same units as k; 

x k = particle size multiplier for particle size range and units of interest; 

x sL = road surface silt loading (grams per square meter [g/m2

]);

x W = average weight (tons) of the vehicles traveling the road; 

x C = emission factor for 1980s vehicle fleet exhaust, brake wear and tire wear; 

x P = number of “wet” days with at least 0.01 inches (0.254 millimeters) of precipitation 

during the averaging period; and 

x N = number of days in the averaging period (e.g., 365 for annual, 91 for seasonal, 30 for 

monthly). 

For purposes of the above calculations, the following estimates and assumptions were made: 

x Weight for passenger vehicles used by employees is two tons; average weight (full versus 

empty) for supply/delivery truck is ten tons; and average weight of resin truck (full versus 

empty) is 20 tons; 

x Distance of unpaved roads is equal to 19 miles; speed limit of passenger vehicles is 35 

mph and delivery and resin trucks are 15 mph; 

x Resin trucks make 70 trips a year; delivery trucks make weekly trips (52 a year); 

x For employees, it was assumed that 70 percent would be commuting from Casper, and 30 

percent from Rawlins; 87 employees would carpool in 33 vehicles, driving 240 days each 

year (the number of work days, taking holidays and vacations into account); 

x Emissions were calculated for the Operation phase only. 

)LQDO(,6/RVW&UHHN8UDQLXP,Q6LWX5HFRYHU\3URMHFW9ROXPH,, $SSHQGL[+ +
### §2513. Confiscation of wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepting devices

Any electronic, mechanical, or other device used, sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed, sold, or advertised in violation of section 2511 or section 2512 of this chapter may be seized and forfeited to the United States. All provisions of law relating to (1) the seizure, summary and judicial forfeiture, and condemnation of vessels, vehicles, merchandise, and baggage for violations of the customs laws contained in title 19 of the United States Code, (2) the disposition of such vessels, vehicles, merchandise, and baggage or the proceeds from the sale thereof, (3) the remission or mitigation of such forfeiture, (4) the compromise of claims, and (5) the award of compensation to informers in respect of such forfeitures, shall apply to seizures and forfeitures incurred, or alleged to have been incurred, under the provisions of this section, insofar as applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions of this section; except that such duties as are imposed upon the collector of customs or any other person with respect to the seizure and forfeiture of vessels, vehicles, merchandise, and baggage under the provisions of the customs laws contained in title 19 of the United States Code shall be performed with respect to seizure and forfeiture of electronic, mechanical, or other intercepting devices under this section by such officers, agents, or other persons as may be authorized or designated for that purpose by the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title III, §802, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 215; amended Pub. L. 99–508, title I, §101(c)(1)(A), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1851.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–508 substituted "wire, oral, or electronic" for "wire or oral" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–508 effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 111 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2510 of this title.
§ 75.216 Applications not evaluated for funding. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70326 , Aug. 29, 2024.
The Secretary does not evaluate an application if— ( a ) The applicant is not eligible;
( b ) The applicant does not comply with all of the procedural rules that govern the submission of the application;
( c ) The application does not contain the information required under the program; or
( d ) The proposed project cannot be funded under the authorizing statute or implementing regulations for the program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[57 FR 30338, July 8, 1992]
[KPMG Letterhead]

       2400 First Indiana Plaza
       135 North Pennsylvania Street
       Indianapolis, IN 46204-2452







The Board of Directors
First Indiana Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-64851) on Form S-8 of First Indiana Corporation of our report dated
January 18, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of First Indiana
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of First
Indiana Corporation.



/s/  KPMG LLP
     KPMG LLP
     Indianapolis, Indiana
     March 17, 2000





          KPMG LLP.  KPMG LLP, a U.S.limited liability partnership, is
          a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6413

In Re: MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-94-1903-4-21BE)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 13, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael F. Dehoney, a state prisoner, filed a petition for a

writ of mandamus requesting that a federal district judge and a

magistrate judge recuse themselves from all of his pending and

future cases. In support of his petition, Dehoney provides a detailed list of the adverse rulings made by these judges in prior

cases involving Dehoney. Because Dehoney appears dissatisfied

merely with the judges's rulings in his cases, and he has not

established any extrajudicial bias, recusal is not warranted. See

In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987) (holding that nature

of alleged bias must be personal and not arising out of litigation). Nor may mandamus be used as a substitute for an appeal. See

id. at 826.

We therefore deny Dehoney's petition for a writ of mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Virologic Evaluation of the 
Modes of Influenza Virus Transmission among Humans, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA), IP11-001, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., May 17, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan 
Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337, Telephone: (770) 997-1100.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Virologic Evaluation of the Modes of Influenza Virus 
Transmission among Humans, FOA IP11-001.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-7883 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
§ 244.13 Termination of temporary treatment benefits. ( a ) Temporary treatment benefits terminate upon a final determination with respect to the alien's eligibility for Temporary Protected Status.
( b ) Temporary treatment benefits terminate, in any case, sixty (60) days after the date that notice is published of the termination of a foreign state's designation under section 244(b)(3) of the Act.
[56 FR 619, Jan. 7, 1991. Redesignated at 62 FR 10367, 10382, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 63596, Nov. 16, 1998]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                    HELLER FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To Heller Financial, Inc.
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated January 18, 1999 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note 25, as to which the date is February 15, 1999) included in
this Form 10-K/A at page 56, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-3 No.
333-58723.
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 1999
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Mistral Ventures, Inc. - Exhibit 10.4






EXHIBIT A TO BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT 

FORM OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 

	US$1,000,000 	September 7, 2007 
	  	  
	Cypheredge Technologies, Inc. 	  
	13810 SE Eastgate Way, Bldg1, Suite 160 	  
	Bellevue, Washington 98005 	  


                              
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (the “Company”) promises to pay to the
order, and at the offices of, Mistral Ventures,
Inc. (the “Lender”), the principal sum of US$1,000,000 in lawful
currency of the United States, together with interest on the outstanding amount
thereof at a rate of 10% per annum calculated from the date hereof, compounded
annually not in advance, as well after as before maturity, default and judgment,
and repayable in full plus accrued interest on December 31, 2007.

                              
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood and agreed that the undersigned
shall pay to the Lender all of the principal and interest evidenced by this
Promissory Note within ten days of the closing of the Formal Agreement described
in the Term Sheet, dated for reference July 25, 2007, entered into between the
Lender and the undersigned.

                              
This Promissory Note is being issued in accordance with and is subject to the
terms of a Bridge Loan Agreement entered into between the undersigned and the
Lender dated of even date herewith. 

                              
Presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour are hereby
waived. 

                              
In the event that this Note is placed with an attorney for collection, the
undersigned shall pay all of the Lender’s costs and expenses of collection,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Cypheredge Technologies, Inc.


 

/s/ James Linkous 
By: James
Linkous, President and CEO
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE                ACT                RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, Dean E. Sukowatey, President of ICrystal, Inc. (the “Company”),                hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant                to                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying                report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, and                filed                with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the                “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that                the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: March 21, 2007. | /s/ DEAN E. SUKOWATEY |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------|--------|

|   | Dean E. SukowateyPresident |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
### **CHAPTER 305—COMMITMENT AND TRANSFER**

Sec.
4081.
Classification and treatment of prisoners.
4082.
Commitment to Attorney General; residential treatment centers; extension of limits of confinement; work furlough.
4083.
Penitentiary imprisonment; consent.
4084.
Repealed.
4085.
Repealed.
4086.
Temporary safe-keeping of federal offenders by marshals.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(14), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500, substituted "centers;" for "centers," in item 4082.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §218(e), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027, substituted "Repealed" for "Copy of commitment delivered with prisoner" in item 4084, and "Repealed" for "Transfer for state offense; expense" in item 4085.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–176, §2, Sept. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 675, substituted "residential treatment centers, extension of limits of confinement; work furlough" for "transfer" in item 4082.
(No. 6808

#### Memorial Hospital of Springfield, Illinois, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

Robert H. Stephen, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 988

 986

 963

 977

 976

 985

 1,016

 993

 964

 927

 938

 956

 1,016

 745

 1,048

 1,026

 1,064

 1,044

 978

 939

 904

 953

 905

 915

 885

 911

 962

 1,054

 1,088

 1,055

 983

 236

 237

 239

 252

 260

 249

 260

 258

 249

 252

 293

 257

 275

 258

 398

 270

 274

 308

 276

 275

 302

 302

 306

 314

 339

 333

 325

 320

 330

 333

 328

 439

 522

 564

 597

 555

 608

 597

 571

 616

 585

 561

 596

 633

 450

 667

 474

 605

 642

 533

 521

 609

 628

 623

 644

 610

 639

 594

 651

 664

 646

 571

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 15, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 287

 339

 365

 385

 359

 392

 385

 369

 397

 378

 363

 384

 407

 294

 428

 309

 390

 413

 345

 338

 392

 404

 401

 414

 393

 411

 383

 418

 426

 415

 369

TOTAL 18,215

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 694.11 What is the maximum indirect cost rate for an agency of a State or local government? Notwithstanding 34 CFR 75.560-75.562 and 2 CFR part 200, subpart E—Cost Principles, the maximum indirect cost rate that an agency of a State or local government receiving funds under GEAR UP may use to charge indirect costs to these funds is the lesser of— ( a ) The rate established by the negotiated indirect cost agreement; or
( b ) Eight percent of a modified total direct cost base.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-21 to 1070a-28)
[65 FR 24760, Apr. 27, 2000. Redesignated at 75 FR 65798, Oct. 26, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 76105, Dec. 19, 2014]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,038

 1,048

 1,031

 1,067

 994

 996

 997

 990

 954

 781

 889

 779

 915

 915

 832

 778

 775

 786

 736

 735

 730

 718

 483

 649

 654

 614

 499

 610

 509

 540

 477

 424

 436

 384

 393

 366

 362

 404

 365

 383

 368

 409

 443

 444

 424

 394

 394

 407

 376

 373

 423

 433

 426

 482

 479

 440

 422

 497

 462

 502

 756

 754

 707

 671

 617

 573

 658

 708

 645

 505

 555

 609

 656

 605

 569

 540

 565

 565

 561

 543

 578

 591

 445

 531

 596

 512

 463

 555

 487

 519

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 10, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 483

 482

 453

 431

 397

 370

 423

 454

 415

 328

 359

 392

 421

 390

 368

 350

 365

 365

 363

 352

 373

 381

 291

 344

 384

 332

 302

 359

 317

 337

TOTAL 17,639

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 76.100 Effect of this subpart.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70335, Aug. 29, 2024.

This subpart establishes general requirements that a State must meet to apply for a grant under a program covered by this part. Additional requirements are in the authorizing statute and the implementing regulations for the program.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

[52 FR 27804, July 24, 1987]