alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 81.44 Final decision of the Department. ( a ) The ALJ's initial decision becomes the final decision of the Department 60 days after the recipient receives the ALJ's decision unless the Secretary modifies, sets aside, or remands the decision during the 60-day period.
( b ) If the Secretary modifies or sets aside the ALJ's initial decision, a copy of the Secretary's decision is provided to the parties by submission to OES. If the ALJ has permitted written submissions to be filed in paper format, the decision will be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by another parcel service with delivery confirmation. The Secretary's decision becomes the final decision of the Department on the date it is electronically filed or, if sent via parcel delivery service, on the delivery date indicated by the certified mail or parcel delivery records.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1234(f)(1), 1234a(g), and 3474(a))
[54 FR 19512, May 5, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 58 FR 43473, 43474, Aug. 16, 1993; 86 FR 52833, Sept. 23, 2021]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 454

 451

 374

 243

 240

 297

 408

 256

 261

 247

 228

 238

 266

 280

 270

 295

 299

 280

 272

 272

 308

 355

 388

 393

 389

 381

 373

 394

 399

 400

 392

 179

 159

 176

 160

 171

 163

 164

 161

 184

 183

 177

 199

 201

 194

 209

 208

 212

 215

 223

 230

 241

 263

 274

 285

 269

 290

 306

 315

 322

 334

 333

 283

 255

 235

 203

 203

 201

 236

 198

 202

 206

 204

 217

 223

 222

 227

 232

 233

 234

 242

 247

 267

 308

 328

 326

 330

 327

 331

 345

 348

 357

 358

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 191

 174

 161

 141

 141

 140

 162

 138

 141

 143

 142

 150

 154

 153

 156

 159

 160

 161

 166

 169

 181

 206

 219

 217

 220

 218

 221

 229

 231

 237

 237

TOTAL 8,128

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Post Office Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov

H. C ARL M YERS Assistant Attorney General General Litigation Division 512-463-2120

F AX : (512) 320-0667

E MAIL : carl.myers@texasattorneygeneral.gov

June 13, 2016

Via FileandServeXpress

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals 209 West 14th Street, Room 401 Austin, Texas 78701

RE: Cause No. 03-16-00062-CV; Williams v. Paul, et al., on appeal from the 200 th District Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No, D-1-GN-005833 (appeal of denial of Plea to the Jurisdiction).

Cause No. 03-16-00052-CV; La Marque Indep. Sch. Dist., et al. v. Willaims, on appeal from the 200 th District Court of Travis County, Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-00583 (appeal of denial of Motion for Temporary Injunction)

Dear Mr. Kyle:

Please file this letter on behalf of appellants. Counsel is being served by electronic service provider. Thank you for your assistance.

T O THE H ONORABLE T HIRD C OURT OF A PPEALS :

I write regarding the above-referenced cross appeals related to the La Marque Independent School District. TEA’s Commissioner appeals the denial of his plea and the District appeals the denial of its temporary injunction motion. Both appeals raise issues of great importance to the State’s administration of public education.

Pursuant to statute, closure of the La Marque Independent School District is scheduled for July 1, 2016. Because of the impending closure deadline, the timeliness of this Court’s determination of the issues is of paramount importance. At this time, both appeals are fully briefed and ripe for submission, set by this Court for June 23, 2016.

Sincerely,

/s/ H. Carl Myers ACCEPTED
03-16-00062-CV

11121360
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
6/13/2016 5:09:29 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKH. CARL MYERS Assistant Attorney General General Litigation Division

cc: Ron Rainey

Chris Tritico
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 1 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 2 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 3 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 4 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 5 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 6 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 7 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 8 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 9 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 10 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 11 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 12 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 13 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 14 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 15 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 16 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 17 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 18 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 19 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 20 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Desc

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 21 of 22
Case 20-30524-KLP Doc 9-2 Filed 02/06/20 Entered 02/06/20 12:43:58 Des

Exhibit(s) Amended Motion Page 22 of 22
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Peters, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Earth Products and
Technologies, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



Date: March 24, 2006            /s/ John W. Peters
                                John W. Peters
                                Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of American Dairy, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of American Dairy,
Inc.





Date:  April 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Leng You-BinLeng
      You-BinChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
              /s/ Jonathan H. ChouJonathan
      H. ChouChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to American Dairy, Inc. and will be retained
by American Dairy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARACELY GOMEZ,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID AVALOS AND WINGFOOT 

ENTERPISES, INC. D/B/A 

ALLEGIANCE STAFFING, 

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00236-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013DCV3850)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After the record and briefs were filed, we determined that the judgment was not final 

because it did not dispose of all of the parties. Rather than dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction, the Court entered an order abating the appeal and remanding the cause to the trial 

court to give the parties and trial court an opportunity to finalize the judgment. After multiple 

extensions of time, a final judgment still has not been entered. Accordingly, we reinstate the 

appeal.

Appellant, Aracely Gomez, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal because the judgment 

is not final as to all parties. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the 
- 2 -

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied. Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against Appellant. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

June 5, 2019

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
§ 668.1 Scope. ( a ) This part establishes general rules that apply to an institution that participates in any student financial assistance program authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (Title IV, HEA program). To the extent that an institution contracts with a third-party servicer to administer any aspect of the institution's participation in any Title IV, HEA program, the applicable rules in this part also apply to that servicer. An institution's use of a third-party servicer does not alter the institution's responsibility for compliance with the rules in this part.
( b ) As used in this part, an “institution,” unless otherwise specified, includes— ( 1 ) An institution of higher education as defined in 34 CFR 600.4;
( 2 ) A proprietary institution of higher education as defined in 34 CFR 600.5; and
( 3 ) A postsecondary vocational institution as defined in 34 CFR 600.6.
( c ) The Title IV, HEA programs include— ( 1 ) The Federal Pell Grant Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a *et seq.;* 34 CFR part 690);
( 2 ) The Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a-1; 34 CFR part 691);
( 3 ) The Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070b *et seq.;* 34 CFR parts 673 and 676);
( 4 ) The Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070c *et seq.;* 34 CFR part 692);
( 5 ) The Federal Stafford Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1071 *et seq.;* 34 CFR part 682);
( 6 ) The Federal PLUS Program (20 U.S.C. 1078-2; 34 CFR part 682);
( 7 ) The Federal Consolidation Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1078-3; 34 CFR part 682);
( 8 ) The Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program (42 U.S.C. 2751 *et seq.;* 34 CFR parts 673 and 675);
( 9 ) The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program (20 U.S.C. 1087a *et seq.;* 34 CFR part 685);
( 10 ) The Federal Perkins Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1087aa *et seq.;* 34 CFR parts 673 and 674);
( 11 ) The National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a-1; 34 CFR part 691); and
( 12 ) The Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant program.
[52 FR 45724, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 36696, July 31, 1991; 59 FR 22418, Apr. 29, 1994; 61 FR 60396, Nov. 27, 1996; 63 FR 40623, July 29, 1998; 65 FR 38729, June 22, 2000; 71 FR 38002, July 3, 2006; 73 FR 35492, June 23, 2008; 85 FR 54813, Sept. 2, 2020]
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 519 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

premiums for insurance which constitutes medical care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, 

Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. GIBBS, and Mr. DUNCAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for premiums for insurance which constitutes 

medical care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Free Health In5 surance Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH INSUR7 ANCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 519 IH

1 by redesignating section 224 as section 225 and by insert2 ing after section 223 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 224. DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH IN4 SURANCE. 

5 ‘‘In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed 

6 as a deduction to the taxpayer for the taxable year 

7 amounts paid by the taxpayer for insurance which con8 stitutes medical care (as defined in section 213(d)) for the 

9 taxpayer and the taxpayer’s spouse and dependents. No 

10 amount shall be taken into account under the preceding 

11 sentence if a deduction or credit is allowed for such 

12 amount under this chapter or to any other taxpayer.’’. 

13 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT INDI14 VIDUAL ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a) 

15 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting before 

16 the last sentence at the end the following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(22) DEDUCTION FOR PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH

18 INSURANCE.—The deduction allowed by section 

19 224.’’. 

20 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

22 is amended by striking the item relating to section 224 

23 and adding at the end the following new items: 

‘‘Sec. 224. Deduction for premiums for health insurance. 

‘‘Sec. 225. Cross reference.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 519 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2
         I, William Smith, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Adsero Corporation.

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: November 15, 2004             /s/ William Smith
                                             ------------------
                                             William Smith
                                             Title:   Principal Accounting and
                                             Financial Officer

                                       25
#### § 677.1 Calculations.

For the purpose of calculating allocations under section 314(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (division M of Pub. L. 116-260, December 27, 2020), an institution that has a total endowment of less than $1,000,000, including an institution that does not have an endowment, will be treated by the Secretary as having a total endowment of $1,000,000.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted)
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 In
Witness Whereof
 /s/ BARRY D. QUART, PHARM.D.

Barry D. Quart, Pharm.D.
    
    /s/ DENIS HICKEY

Denis HickeyChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer
### §1387. Demonstrations at cemeteries under the control of the National Cemetery Administration and at Arlington National Cemetery

Whoever violates section 2413 of title 38 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 109–228, §3(a), May 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 388.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,045

 4,185

 4,065

 4,699

 3,868

 3,160

 3,314

 3,198

 3,404

 3,325

 3,671

 3,974

 4,016

 4,009

 4,065

 4,468

 4,422

 5,205

 5,077

 5,202

 4,491

 3,815

 3,833

 3,910

 4,268

 4,394

 4,587

 5,117

 5,911

 6,583

 5,723

 319

 328

 341

 408

 375

 404

 419

 384

 473

 363

 311

 357

 355

 319

 370

 453

 424

 459

 547

 613

 426

 508

 456

 447

 441

 504

 476

 492

 556

 696

 687

 1,248

 1,337

 1,530

 1,571

 1,356

 1,106

 1,181

 1,300

 1,606

 1,245

 856

 1,041

 1,075

 1,096

 1,265

 1,506

 1,604

 1,875

 1,863

 2,110

 1,844

 1,755

 1,434

 1,275

 1,430

 1,622

 1,587

 1,900

 2,447

 2,784

 2,423

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 19, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 19,583

 19,377

 19,173

 18,882

 18,582

 18,102

 17,619

 17,343

 17,777

 17,996

 17,851

 17,827

 17,586

 17,548

 17,565

 17,734

 17,808

 18,112

 18,619

 19,623

 20,286

 20,741

 20,569

 20,599

 21,173

 21,754

 22,266

 23,070

 24,252

 25,530

 26,349

 1,399

 1,384

 1,370

 1,349

 1,327

 1,293

 1,259

 1,239

 1,270

 1,285

 1,275

 1,273

 1,256

 1,253

 1,255

 1,267

 1,272

 1,294

 1,330

 1,402

 1,449

 1,482

 1,469

 1,471

 1,512

 1,554

 1,590

 1,648

 1,732

 1,824

 1,882

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER