alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 269

 281

 292

 288

 329

 304

 280

 263

 258

 271

 318

 307

 333

 324

 360

 418

 390

 382

 305

 284

 274

 337

 425

 427

 334

 417

 327

 365

 380

 404

 369

 242

 242

 243

 241

 245

 245

 245

 240

 246

 250

 243

 247

 246

 238

 235

 236

 231

 229

 222

 226

 225

 235

 233

 229

 232

 228

 245

 245

 241

 245

 241

 247

 250

 253

 251

 261

 261

 255

 250

 249

 255

 256

 258

 261

 257

 255

 261

 256

 250

 239

 241

 243

 250

 261

 261

 253

 260

 259

 260

 263

 268

 268

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 2, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 169

 171

 172

 171

 177

 177

 174

 171

 170

 174

 174

 175

 177

 175

 174

 177

 174

 171

 164

 165

 166

 171

 177

 177

 172

 177

 176

 177

 179

 182

 182

TOTAL 7,912

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### Part F—International Standard-Setting Activities
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5057 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5057

  To clarify the treatment of pass-through status under the Medicare 
              outpatient payment system for certain drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2019

Mr. Tonko (for himself and Mr. McKinley) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the treatment of pass-through status under the Medicare 
              outpatient payment system for certain drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pass-Through Technical Corrections 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PASS-THROUGH STATUS UNDER MEDICARE OPPS FOR 
              CERTAIN DRUGS.

    Notwithstanding section 1301 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act 
of 2018 (Public Law 115-141), in the case of a radiopharmaceutical drug 
for which pass-through status was provided pursuant to section 
1833(t)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(6)) and whose 
period of pass-through status initially expired on either December 31, 
2017, or December 31, 2018, if such radiopharmaceutical drug is 
indicated for positron emission tomography beta amyloid imaging covered 
under a coverage evidence development determination under section 
1862(a)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(1)(E)), 
then such pass-through status shall be extended until such date that 
the coverage with evidence development review is determined by the 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to be completed.
                                 <all>
```
§ 79.7 How does the Secretary communicate with State and local officials concerning the Department's programs and activities? ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) ( 1 ) The Secretary provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed federal financial assistance if: ( i ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( ii ) The assistance involves a program or activity not selected for the state process.
( 2 ) This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other means which the Secretary determine appropriate.
(Authority: E.O. 12372, Sec. 2)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Markland Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company,
certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/ ROBERT TARINI                            /S/ KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
----------------------------                 -----------------------------
ROBERT TARINI                                KENNETH P. DUCEY, JR.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATE:  NOVEMBER 15, 2004                     DATE:  NOVEMBER 15, 2004
#### § 385.41 What are the requirements affecting the collection of data from designated State agencies?

If the collection of data is necessary from individuals with disabilities being served by two or more designated State agencies or from employees of two or more of these agencies, the project director must submit requests for the data to appropriate representatives of the affected agencies, as determined by the Secretary. This requirement also applies to employed project staff and individuals enrolled in courses of study supported under these programs.

(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
### part 3—ascertainment, collection, and recovery of duties
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0506 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-020-AD 

Article: L’Hotellier Portable Halon 1211 Fire Extinguishers

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,000 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: to prevent using contaminated gas that may reduce fire suppression and release toxic fumes that 

would endanger the safety of the helicopter and its occupants.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $212

Labor per Helicopter

(1 x $85/work-hour) $85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $297 

Total US Fleet Cost $297,000, assuming the fire extinguishers are 

replaced on the estimated fleet.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: J. R. Holton, Jr.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4971 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘Norman Duncan Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4971 RFS

1 SECTION 1. NORMAN DUNCAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 15 East Market Street in Lees4 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Norman Duncan Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Norman Duncan Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NO. 12-24-00037-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST 

OF R. H., A CHILD

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 321ST 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

K.H., acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on March 6, 2024. On March 7, the Clerk of 

this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal failed to contain the information 

specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the 

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on 

each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). The notice warned that, unless 

Appellant filed a proper notice of appeal on or before March 18, the appeal would be referred to

the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and Appellant has not filed a compliant notice of 

appeal or other response to this Court’s notice.

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a), 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days’

1 Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all 

applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties 

represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 

(Tex. App.—Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).
2

notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because 

appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the 

clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered April 10, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT 

APRIL 10, 2024 

NO. 12-24-00037-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R. H., A CHILD

Appeal from the 321st District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 23-0541-D) 

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed. 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance. 

By per curiam opinion. 

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CorVu Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Justin M.MacIntosh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated:  April 29, 2003 |                    |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        |                    |
|                        |                    |
|                        | /s/ Justin M. MacIntosh |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Aristotle Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean T. Johnson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

 

 

April 25, 2008

 

/s/ Dean T. Johnson *

 

Dean T. Johnson

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
### §3505. Foreign records of regularly conducted activity

(a)(1) In a criminal proceeding in a court of the United States, a foreign record of regularly conducted activity, or a copy of such record, shall not be excluded as evidence by the hearsay rule if a foreign certification attests that—

(A) such record was made, at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth, by (or from information transmitted by) a person with knowledge of those matters;

(B) such record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity;

(C) the business activity made such a record as a regular practice; and

(D) if such record is not the original, such record is a duplicate of the original;

unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness.

(2) A foreign certification under this section shall authenticate such record or duplicate.

(b) At the arraignment or as soon after the arraignment as practicable, a party intending to offer in evidence under this section a foreign record of regularly conducted activity shall provide written notice of that intention to each other party. A motion opposing admission in evidence of such record shall be made by the opposing party and determined by the court before trial. Failure by a party to file such motion before trial shall constitute a waiver of objection to such record or duplicate, but the court for cause shown may grant relief from the waiver.

(c) As used in this section, the term—

(1) "foreign record of regularly conducted activity" means a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, maintained in a foreign country;

(2) "foreign certification" means a written declaration made and signed in a foreign country by the custodian of a foreign record of regularly conducted activity or another qualified person that, if falsely made, would subject the maker to criminal penalty under the laws of that country; and

(3) "business" includes business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not conducted for profit.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1217(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2165.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1220, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2167, provided that: "This part [part K (§§1217–1220) of chapter XII of title II of Pub. L. 98–473, enacting this section and sections 3292, 3506, and 3507 of this title and amending section 3161 of this title] and the amendments made by this part shall take effect thirty days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 12, 1984]."
§ 608.40 What are allowable costs and what are the limitations on allowable costs? ( a ) *Allowable costs.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a grantee may expend grant funds for activities that are related to carrying out the allowable activities included in its approved application.
( b ) *Supplement and not supplant.* Grant funds shall be used so that they supplement, and to the extent practical, increase the funds that would otherwise be available for the activities to be carried out under the grant, and in no case supplant those funds.
( c ) *Limitations on allowable costs.* A grantee may not— ( 1 ) Spend more than fifty percent of its grant award in each fiscal year for costs relating to constructing or maintaining a classroom, library, laboratory, or other instructional facility; or
( 2 ) Use an indirect cost rate to determine allowable costs under its grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1062 and 1066)
1

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1375

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of North Dakota.

Crystal Lee Fredericks, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 13, 2004

Filed: April 13, 2005 

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

On November 18, 2003, a jury found Crystal Lee Fredericks guilty of

possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance–five grams or more of

methamphetamine. The district court1

 sentenced Fredericks to sixty-three months'

imprisonment, with a four-year term of supervised release. This appeal followed. 

This case was submitted to the court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Fredericks' counsel moves to withdraw, arguing that there exists no
-2-

appealable issues in this case and that Fredericks no longer wishes to pursue her

appeal. 

Having carefully reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Further, we find no dispute with the

assertions of Fredericks' counsel concerning Fredericks' own wishes. Accordingly,

we affirm and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. 

______________________________
### §3072. Determination of entitlement; maximum amount; Presidential approval; conclusiveness

The Attorney General shall determine whether an individual furnishing information described in section 3071 is entitled to a reward and the amount to be paid.

(Added Pub. L. 98–533, title I, §101(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2707; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title III, §301(c)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1781.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273, which directed amendment of section 3072 of chapter 203, was executed to this section, which is in chapter 204, by striking out at end "A reward under this section may be in an amount not to exceed $500,000. A reward of $100,000 or more may not be made without the approval of the President or the Attorney General personally. A determination made by the Attorney General or the President under this chapter shall be final and conclusive, and no court shall have power or jurisdiction to review it."
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 19, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on December 3, 2010 75 FR 75494, Mylan Technologies, Inc., 110 Lake Street, Saint Albans, Vermont 05478, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:
                    ( print page 17968) Drug
ScheduleMethylphenidate (1724)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances in finished dosage form (FDF) from foreign sources for analytical testing and clinical trials in which the foreign FDF will be compared to the company's own domestically-manufactured FDF. This analysis is required to allow the company to export domestically-manufactured FDF to foreign markets. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. DEA has investigated Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: March 21, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-7545 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 212

 210

 209

 208

 203

 206

 202

 206

 213

 205

 200

 197

 181

 166

 158

 153

 158

 150

 157

 151

 139

 134

 136

 139

 142

 145

 142

 137

 141

 146

 146

 196

 196

 196

 196

 195

 195

 196

 196

 192

 184

 179

 164

 152

 144

 132

 142

 145

 140

 124

 125

 96

 91

 104

 112

 118

 119

 124

 128

 128

 136

 141

 204

 201

 200

 199

 198

 199

 198

 198

 197

 192

 189

 183

 172

 159

 147

 148

 149

 145

 140

 135

 121

 110

 113

 120

 124

 127

 130

 131

 134

 140

 143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,905

 2,902

 2,901

 2,897

 2,888

 2,879

 2,868

 2,856

 2,844

 2,826

 2,803

 2,774

 2,737

 2,689

 2,632

 2,579

 2,528

 2,474

 2,416

 2,352

 2,275

 2,187

 2,103

 2,031

 1,966

 1,910

 1,868

 1,840

 1,827

 1,819

 1,813

 208

 207

 207

 207

 206

 206

 205

 204

 203

 202

 200

 198

 196

 192

 188

 184

 181

 177

 173

 168

 163

 156

 150

 145

 140

 136

 133

 131

 131

 130

 130

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip N. Kaplan, Chief Operating Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Subsection 1350, as adopted pursuant to Subsection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: