alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of SunGard Data Systems Inc. as of December 31, 1998
and the consolidated statement of income for the twelve months ended December
31, 1998, both included in the Form 10-K of SunGard Data Systems Inc. for the
twelve months ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         240,469
<SECURITIES>                                    17,566
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,657
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               584,316
<PP&E>                                         382,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                 249,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,075,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,614
<BONDS>                                          2,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     759,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,075,321
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,159,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  697,029<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,847<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                208,228
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Excludes selling, marketing and administrative costs, and merger and
restructuring costs.
<F2>Merger and restructuring costs.
<F3>Includes merger and restructuring costs totaling $0.09 per share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 76.104 A State shall include certain certifications in its State plan. ( a ) A State shall include the following certifications in each State plan: ( 1 ) That the plan is submitted by the State agency that is eligible to submit the plan.
( 2 ) That the State agency has authority under State law to perform the functions of the State under the program.
( 3 ) That the State legally may carry out each provision of the plan.
( 4 ) That all provisions of the plan are consistent with State law.
( 5 ) That a State officer, specified by title in the certification, has authority under State law to receive, hold, and disburse Federal funds made available under the plan.
( 6 ) That the State officer who submits the plan, specified by title in the certification, has authority to submit the plan.
( 7 ) That the agency that submits the plan has adopted or otherwise formally approved the plan.
( 8 ) That the plan is the basis for State operation and administration of the program.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.142 Claims. ( a ) *General.* The manufacturer must file claim for drawback with the appropriate TTB officer who has the authority to approve or disapprove claims. A separate claim shall be filed for each place of business. Each claim shall pertain only to distilled spirits used in the manufacture or production of nonbeverage products during any one quarter of the tax year. Unless the manufacturer is eligible to file monthly claims (see §§ 17.143 and 17.144), only one claim per quarter may be filed for each place of business. Claims shall be filed on TTB Form 2635 (5620.8), Claim—Alcohol and Tobacco Taxes.
( b ) *Manufacturers who are also proprietors of distilled spirits plants.* If a manufacturer of nonbeverage products is owned and operated by the same business entity that owns and operates a distilled spirits plant, the manufacturer's claim for drawback may be filed for credit on Form 2635 (5620.8). After the claim is approved, the distilled spirits plant may use the claim as an adjustment decreasing the taxes due in Schedule B of TTB Form 5000.24, Excise Tax Return. Adjustments resulting from an approved drawback claim are not subject to interest. This procedure may be utilized only if the manufacturer of nonbeverage products and the distilled spirits plant have the same employer identification number.
[T.D. ATF-379, 61 FR 31412, June 20, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5471, Jan. 19, 2001]
WWW.78 FR 17157, “Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Disapproval of

State Implementation Plan Revision for ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor” Proposed Rule, 

March 20, 2013 (Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-03-20/pdf/2013-

06419.pdf)

XXX.71 FR 12623, “Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri“ Final Rule, March 13, 2006 (Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR2006-03-13/pdf/06-2378.pdf)

YYY. 78 FR 78720, “Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

Indiana; Disapproval of State Implementation Plan Revision for ArcelorMittal Burns 

Harbor” Final Rule, December 27, 2013 (Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR2013-12-27/pdf/2013-30885.pdf)

ZZZ. 79 FR 17043, “Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

Virginia; Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards” Final Rule, March 27, 2014 (Available at 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-03-27/pdf/2014-06586.pdf#page=1) 

AAAA.79 FR 62022, “Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West

Virginia; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards” Final Rule, October 16, 2014 (Available at 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-10-16/pdf/2014-24658.pdf#page=1) 

BBBB.80 FR 46271, “Notice of Availability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s

Updated Ozone Transport Modeling Data for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS)” Notice of Data Availability, August 4, 2015 (Available at 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-08-04/pdf/2015-18878.pdf)
§ 648.60 When does an academic department make a commitment to a fellow to provide stipend support? ( a ) An academic department makes a commitment to a fellow at any point in his or her graduate study for the length of time necessary for the fellow to complete the course of graduate study, but in no case longer than five years.
( b ) An academic department shall not make a commitment under paragraph (a) of this section to provide stipend support unless the academic department has determined that adequate funds are available to fulfill the commitment either from funds received or anticipated under this part or from institutional funds.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135c)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999.

#### § 1.40 Change of name.

In the event of any change in the name (trade or corporate name) of a permittee, or, in the event a permittee desires to engage in operations under an additional trade name, such permittee must file application Form 5100.18 for an amended basic permit, which application must be approved, and amended permit issued, before operations may be commenced under the new name.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1512-0090)

[T.D. ATF-373, 61 FR 26098, May 24, 1996, as amended by T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999]
#### § 686.30 Scope.

This subpart deals with TEACH Grant program administration by a TEACH Grant-eligible institution.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0715

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. TREVOR ROBERTS,

Defendant and Appellant, O R D E R

_________________ Counsel for Appellant Trevor Roberts has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file the transcripts in this matter. No affidavit from the court reporter was filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. A ppellant has until February 28, 2024, to file the transcripts. No further extensions will be granted unless an affidavit from the court reporter is filed. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 18 2024

01/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0715
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.7 Delegations of the Administrator.

The regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.17, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 17, Drawback on Taxpaid Distilled Spirits Used in Manufacturing Nonbeverage Products. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, Jan. 19, 2001, as amended by T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16926, Apr. 4, 2006]
### [§§1008, 1009. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §§961(g)(1), 962(a)(3), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500, 502]

Section 1008, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 751, provided for fine or imprisonment for certain prohibited actions taken to obtain insurance from, or to influence in any way, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.

Section 1009, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 751, provided for fine or imprisonment for making certain statements or rumors, untrue in fact, which were derogatory or affected solvency or financial condition of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1463

ERNEST FRANKLIN COBLE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM J. WILKINS; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; EXAMINER 

#0469241048; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP)

Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. 

Greene, Supervisory Attorney, Sara Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Franklin Coble, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Fair 

Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Coble v. Wilkins, No. 1:11-cv-00211-JAB-JEP (M.D.N.C. 

Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF JUNE 30,
1997 AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, BOTH INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FORM 10-Q OF SUNGARD DATA
SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,633
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,453
<PP&E>                                         297,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 715,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,938
<BONDS>                                          4,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           432
<OTHER-SE>                                     500,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   715,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,912<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,618<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37<F3>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND PURCHASED IN-
PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
<F2>PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.
<F3>INCLUDES PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS TOTALLING $0.07
PER SHARE. ALSO REFLECTS SEPTEMBER 1997 TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 76.700 Compliance with the U.S. Constitution, statutes, regulations, stated institutional policies, and applications.

A State and a subgrantee shall comply with § 76.500, the State plan, applicable statutes, regulations, and approved applications, and shall use Federal funds in accordance with those statutes, regulations, plan, and applications.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474)

[85 FR 59980, Sept. 23, 2020]
CONSENT

We have issued our report dated  January 21, 2000,  except for Notes K and N for
which  the date is March  23,  2000,  accompanying  the  consolidated  financial
statements  of  Sensar  Corporation  included  in the  Annual  Report  of Sensar
Corporation  on Form 10-K,  as amended by Form 10-K/A  filed on October 6, 2000,
for the year ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Sensar Corporation on
Forms S-3 (File No.  333-1505,  effective  March 22,  1996;  File No.  333-6527,
effective August 2, 1996; File No.  333-29923,  effective  October 3, 1997; File
No. 333-49989,  effective May 29, 1998; File No.  333-81253,  effective June 28,
1999 and File No. 333-43320 filed on October 6, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-44784,  filed December 30, 1991; File No. 33-35751,  filed July 5, 1990; File
No.  333-24553,  filed April 4, 1997; and File No.  333-38919  filed October 28,
1997).

                                            GRANT THORNTON LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
October 6, 2000
### SUBCHAPTER I—APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
### §1681b. Enforcement

#### (a) Civil penalty

Any person who violates a provision of section 1681a of this title shall, in addition to the tax and any other penalty provided by law, be liable for a civil penalty for each violation equal to the greater of $1,000 or 5 times the amount of the tax imposed by chapter 52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on all cigarettes or smokeless tobacco products that are the subject of such violation.

#### (b) Forfeitures

Any tobacco product, cigarette papers, or tube, or any smokeless tobacco product, that was imported into the United States or is sought to be imported into the United States in violation of, or without meeting the requirements of, section 1681a of this title shall be forfeited to the United States, or to any State in which such tobacco product, cigarette papers, or tube is found. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any product forfeited to the United States, or to any State, pursuant to this subtitle shall be destroyed.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VIII, §803, as added Pub. L. 106–476, title IV, §4004(a), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2180; amended Pub. L. 109–432, div. C, title IV, §401(d), (e)(1), (3), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3048, 3049.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapter 52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to section 5701 et seq. of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Codification

Another section 803 of act June 17, 1930, is classified to section 1683a of this title.

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–432, §401(e)(1), inserted "or smokeless tobacco products" after "cigarettes".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–432, §401(d), (e)(3), in first sentence, inserted ", or any smokeless tobacco product," before "that was imported" and ", or to any State in which such tobacco product, cigarette papers, or tube is found" before period at end and, in second sentence, inserted ", or to any State," after "United States".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–432 applicable with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after Dec. 20, 2006, see section 401(g) of Pub. L. 109–432, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 30 days after Nov. 9, 2000, see section 4004(b) of Pub. L. 106–476, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
#### Elmer Stevens WHITING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12242.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 15, 1955.

John Wills, Cincinnati, Ohio (Appointed by the Court) for appellant.

Sumner Canary, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and MCALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause having come on to be heard on an appeal from the district court denying appellant’s motion to annul, vacate, and set aside sentence, including appellant’s amendment made thereto after the filing of the principal motion, and it appearing that a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was issued by the district court, pursuant to which, appellant appeared and testified in open court upon the hearing of his motion, and it further appearing that the district court considered, in a comprehensive opinion, the contentions, testimony, and evidence of appellant and the applicable statutes and adjudications upon a review of the entire record, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge MpNamee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 363

 461

 452

 459

 458

 486

 497

 464

 512

 561

 543

 525

 453

 465

 428

 418

 429

 409

 510

 502

 543

 516

 417

 391

 486

 475

 500

 475

 472

 502

 523

 287

 268

 280

 306

 288

 284

 292

 280

 265

 280

 278

 316

 326

 326

 330

 331

 330

 325

 315

 312

 307

 309

 319

 317

 317

 336

 340

 364

 362

 360

 367

 317

 330

 337

 344

 337

 337

 339

 325

 323

 340

 338

 361

 352

 352

 349

 354

 355

 351

 354

 349

 355

 352

 352

 352

 367

 373

 386

 393

 403

 417

 411

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 212

 220

 224

 229

 224

 224

 226

 217

 216

 226

 225

 239

 234

 234

 232

 235

 235

 233

 235

 232

 235

 234

 234

 234

 243

 247

 255

 259

 265

 274

 270

TOTAL 11,005

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,167
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,281
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,364)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               894,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (939,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (939,662)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (939,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>