alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5134 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that care packages mailed 

to a member of the Armed Forces by any family member shall be 

carried at no cost to the family member, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2019 

Ms. BARRAGA ́N introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that 

care packages mailed to a member of the Armed Forces 

by any family member shall be carried at no cost to 

the family member, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Care Package 

5 Program Act’’. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5134 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO-COST MAILING OF CARE PACKAGES TO MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 34 of title 39, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3401 

5 the following new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 3402. Mailing privileges of family members of 

7 members of the Armed Forces of the 

8 United States 

9 ‘‘(a) A military care package shall be carried at no 

10 cost to the sender if the package— 

11 ‘‘(1) is mailed to an individual who is a member 

12 of the Armed Forces deployed in support of a con13 tingency operation; 

14 ‘‘(2) is mailed by a family member of such indi15 vidual; and 

16 ‘‘(3) is addressed to a postal facility located at 

17 an Armed Forces installation. 

18 ‘‘(b) The Department of Defense shall reimburse the 

19 Postal Service for carrying out this section consistent, to 

20 the greatest extent practicable, with the requirements of 

21 the second sentence of subsection (c) and subsection (e) 

22 of section 3401. 

23 ‘‘(c) This section shall be administered under such 

24 conditions, and under such regulations, as the Postal Serv25 ice and the Secretary of Defense jointly may prescribe. 

26 ‘‘(d) In this section— 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5134 IH

1 ‘‘(1) the term ‘contingency operation’ has the 

2 meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of 

3 title 10; and 

4 ‘‘(2) the term ‘family member’ means a parent, 

5 sibling, spouse, or child of an individual who is a 

6 member of the Armed Forces.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

9 relating to section 3401 the following new item: 

‘‘3402. Mailing privileges of family members of members of the Armed Forces 

of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
### §1523. Examination of accounts

The Secretary of the Treasury or such officer or employee as he shall designate, shall, under regulations and instructions prescribed by the Secretary—

(1) examine the customs officers' accounts of receipts and disbursements of money and receipts and disposition of merchandise; and

(2) verify, to such extent as the Secretary of the Treasury shall direct, assessments of duties and taxes and allowances of drawback.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §523, 46 Stat. 740; Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 397, §2(d), 67 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(s), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 290.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §523, 42 Stat. 974. That section was superseded by section 523 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to customs officers for reference to collectors.

1953—Act Aug. 8, 1953, amended section generally by eliminating the provision continuing "naval officers of customs" as "Comptrollers of Customs"; by substituting the reference to "The Secretary of the Treasury or such officer or employee as he shall designate" for references to the comptrollers of customs; and, among other changes, substituting the provision that the verification of assessments of duties and allowances of drawbacks should be to such extent as the Secretary of the Treasury directs, for the former provision requiring such verification in all cases.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1953 Amendment; Savings Provision

Amendment by act Aug. 8, 1953, effective on and after thirtieth day following Aug. 8, 1953, and savings provision, see notes set out under section 1304 of this title.
Joseph D. Barbera 

14706 NE Erickson Dr. 

La Center, WA 98629 

Tel: 360 263 5359 

RECEIVED 

OCT 0 2 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, DC 

In the Matter of: Joseph D. Barbera 

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 

FDMS No. FAA 2013-1083 

Judge Richard Goodwin 

Response to Complaintant's Motions to Strike Response to Motion for 

Summary Judgement and Reponse to Respondent's Motion to Compel 

Discovery( dated 12 June 2014) 

A) Motion to Strike Response as Untimely 

B) Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline 

Response to Motion A 

There is no new information presented by the Complainant. There is nothing new for 

me to add. 

Response to Motion B 

It is my desire to move to the hearing as quickly and efficiently as possible. If the facts 

are as black and white as the Complainant suggests, then we should be able to proceed 

immediately. 

d, 25 September, 2014 

Jose 

1 
Service List 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington D.C. 20591 

David Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., SW 

Renton/ WA 98057 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin/ Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington/ DC 20590 

2
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18189-18190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 10 a.m.-11.a.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS:  Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matter To Be Considered

Decisional Matter: Bed Rails--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.


[[Page 18190]]


    Dated: March 30, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7965 Filed 3-30-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[House Report 112-365]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

112th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     112-365

======================================================================

 
ADDRESSING A MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER SECTION 3101A OF TITLE 31, UNITED 
                              STATES CODE

                                _______
                                

  January 17, 2012.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

       Mr. Scott of South Carolina, from the Committee on Rules, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 515]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 515, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that a motion to proceed with 
regard to a joint resolution of disapproval specified in 
subsection (a)(2) of section 3101A of title 31, United States 
Code, may be offered even if the joint resolution has not been 
reported to the House as contemplated by subsection (c)(3) of 
such section and shall be in order only if offered by the 
Majority Leader or his designee.

                                  

```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,147

 6,552

 5,937

 6,801

 6,512

 6,250

 6,579

 6,249

 5,848

 5,971

 6,114

 5,842

 5,988

 6,961

 7,228

 8,232

 7,261

 7,713

 7,381

 7,866

 5,922

 5,261

 5,742

 5,082

 4,435

 4,832

 6,711

 7,779

 8,086

 7,896

 704

 567

 564

 443

 518

 494

 368

 445

 538

 597

 664

 691

 631

 791

 909

 684

 688

 561

 640

 791

 779

 621

 520

 531

 473

 451

 552

 1,170

 585

 1,231

 2,306

 2,764

 2,400

 2,503

 2,790

 2,677

 2,964

 3,076

 3,032

 3,116

 2,932

 2,830

 2,556

 3,010

 3,293

 3,973

 3,819

 3,914

 3,924

 4,309

 2,676

 2,162

 2,804

 2,564

 2,350

 2,391

 3,053

 4,040

 4,092

 4,133

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 43,415

 43,104

 42,151

 41,012

 40,198

 39,123

 38,454

 38,541

 38,764

 38,631

 37,880

 37,903

 38,102

 38,956

 39,943

 41,152

 42,571

 43,982

 45,116

 46,748

 46,460

 45,546

 45,318

 44,766

 44,184

 43,745

 44,242

 45,272

 46,071

 46,231

 3,101

 3,079

 3,011

 2,929

 2,871

 2,795

 2,747

 2,753

 2,769

 2,759

 2,706

 2,707

 2,722

 2,783

 2,853

 2,939

 3,041

 3,142

 3,223

 3,339

 3,319

 3,253

 3,237

 3,198

 3,156

 3,125

 3,160

 3,234

 3,291

 3,302

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Paramco Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas G. Gregg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:  November 19, 2004



By: _______ /Douglas G. Gregg/ _______

Douglas G. Gregg

Chief Executive Officer
§ 76.569 Using the restricted indirect cost rate. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70338 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Under the programs referenced in § 76.563, the maximum amount of indirect costs under a grant is determined by the following formula: Indirect costs = (Restricted indirect cost rate) × (Total direct costs of the grant minus capital outlays, subgrants, and other distorting or unallowable items as specified in the grantee's indirect cost rate agreement)
( b ) If a grantee uses a restricted indirect cost rate, the general management and fixed costs covered by that rate must be excluded by the grantee from the direct costs it charges to the grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1), 2831(a), 2974(b), and 3474)
[59 FR 59584, Nov. 17, 1994]
§ 686.34 Liability for and recovery of TEACH Grant overpayments. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, a student is liable for any TEACH Grant overpayment made to him or her.
( 2 ) The institution is liable for a TEACH Grant overpayment if the overpayment occurred because the institution failed to follow the procedures set forth in this part or in 34 CFR part 668. The institution must restore an amount equal to the overpayment to its TEACH Grant account.
( 3 ) A student is not liable for, and the institution is not required to attempt recovery of or refer to the Secretary, a TEACH Grant overpayment if the amount of the overpayment is less than $25 and is not a remaining balance.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, if an institution makes a TEACH Grant overpayment for which it is not liable, it must promptly send a written notice to the student requesting repayment of the overpayment amount. The notice must state that failure to make the requested repayment, or to make arrangements satisfactory to the holder of the overpayment debt to repay the overpayment, makes the student ineligible for further title IV, HEA program funds until final resolution of the TEACH Grant overpayment.
( 2 ) If a student objects to the institution's TEACH Grant overpayment determination, the institution must consider any information provided by the student and determine whether the objection is warranted.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, if the student fails to repay a TEACH Grant overpayment or make arrangements satisfactory to the holder of the overpayment debt to repay the TEACH Grant overpayment, after the institution has taken the action required by paragraph (b) of this section, the institution must refer the overpayment to the Secretary for collection in accordance with procedures required by the Secretary. After referring the TEACH Grant overpayment to the Secretary under this section, the institution need make no further efforts to recover the overpayment.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
H:\DATA\PUBLIC\~WATER\~SMITH\FISHDATA\99_00all.wk4 10/19/00 10:36:53 AM 06/01/00 06/06/00 06/11/00 06/16/00 06/21/00 06/26/00 07/01/00 07/06/00 07/11/00 07/16/00 07/21/00 07/26/00 07/31/00 08/05/00 08/10/00 08/15/00 08/20/00 08/25/00 08/30/00 09/04/00 09/09/00 09/14/00 09/19/00 09/24/00 09/29/00

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

Density - DS/Acre foot

0

200

400

Pumping x 100 Acre Foot

Combined Density

SWP Density

CVP Density

14-Day Avg Salvage

SWP Pumping

Total Pumping

Density at Station 918

Delta Smelt Density

2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Tuesday, April 12, 2011.

# PLACE: 

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Cumberland Coal Resources, LP,*                         Docket No. PENN 2008-189. (Issues include whether the judge erred in determining that four violations of 30 CFR 75.380(d)(7)(iv), which requires effective escapeway lifelines, were not “significant and substantial.”)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: 

Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2011-8129 Filed 4-1-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 496

 330

 436

 523

 719

 386

 279

 280

 302

 441

 383

 309

 326

 284

 236

 254

 325

 218

 210

 217

 246

 231

 256

 286

 310

 366

 411

 393

 393

 478

 210

 212

 216

 227

 224

 215

 202

 194

 188

 187

 189

 194

 197

 190

 181

 181

 185

 182

 181

 182

 182

 182

 184

 185

 189

 182

 187

 193

 197

 202

 301

 266

 277

 303

 320

 253

 222

 219

 212

 223

 219

 217

 224

 212

 209

 211

 218

 192

 191

 196

 196

 195

 206

 210

 217

 234

 249

 240

 252

 268

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,661

 3,607

 3,606

 3,639

 3,705

 3,682

 3,649

 3,623

 3,596

 3,576

 3,562

 3,540

 3,515

 3,468

 3,376

 3,321

 3,262

 3,151

 3,022

 2,965

 2,939

 2,915

 2,909

 2,896

 2,894

 2,911

 2,936

 2,964

 3,007

 3,064

 262

 258

 258

 260

 265

 263

 261

 259

 257

 255

 254

 253

 251

 248

 241

 237

 233

 225

 216

 212

 210

 208

 208

 207

 207

 208

 210

 212

 215

 219

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §3188. Time of commitment pending extradition

Whenever any person who is committed for rendition to a foreign government to remain until delivered up in pursuance of a requisition, is not so delivered up and conveyed out of the United States within two calendar months after such commitment, over and above the time actually required to convey the prisoner from the jail to which he was committed, by the readiest way, out of the United States, any judge of the United States, or of any State, upon application made to him by or on behalf of the person so committed, and upon proof made to him that reasonable notice of the intention to make such application has been given to the Secretary of State, may order the person so committed to be discharged out of custody, unless sufficient cause is shown to such judge why such discharge ought not to be ordered.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 824.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §654 (R.S. §5273).

Changes in phraseology only were made.
#### The Robert S. Denham Company, Incorporated, Respondent, *v.*Edwin E. Salt, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 34th day of June, 1913, granting an injunction *pendente lite.*

Scott, J.:

This is an action to restrain what is alleged to be unfair competition with plaintiff’s business on the part of a former employee. In so far as the defendant is accused of using unfair means to attract business we scarcely think that plaintiff has made out a case. The chief contention is as to defendant’s right to use in the transaction of his business certain forms, consisting of sheets of paper ruled in a certain manner and designed for the ready tabulation of items of work in machine shops and like establishments. It is disputed whether these forms were devised by plaintiff’s president or by defendant. That is a question of fact which, if important, can best be determined on the trial. In any event plaintiff’s grievance is rather that defendant has copied its methods of doing business than that he has used unfair means to attract business. We do not think that, upon the papers before us, plaintiff has made out a case for an injunction *pendente lite.*This has nothing to do with the question whether or not it may be entitled, upon the facts shown on the trial, to a *882permanent injunction. The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction *pendente lite*denied, with ten dollars costs. Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

#### § 17.136 Compliance with Food and Drug Administration requirements.

A product is not a medicine, medicinal preparation, food product, flavor, flavoring extract, or perfume for nonbeverage drawback if its formula would violate a ban or restriction of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pertaining to such products. If FDA bans or restricts the use of any ingredient in such a way that further manufacture of a product in accordance with its formula would violate the ban or restriction, then the manufacturer shall change the formula and resubmit it on TTB Form 5154.1 . This section does not preclude approval for products manufactured solely for export or for uses other than internal human consumption (e.g. tobacco flavors or animal feed flavors) in accordance with laws and regulations administered by FDA. Under § 17.123, manufacturers may be required to demonstrate compliance with FDA requirements applicable to this section.
#### §§ 690.72-690.74 [Reserved]