alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

KIA R. YOUNGER 18-14086-KHK

 

 Debtor

TRUSTEE’S RESPONSE TO DEBTOR’S MOTION TO APPROVE SALE OF 

RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee, responds to Debtor’s Motion to Approve Sale of 

Residential Condominium by stating he has no opposition to the requested relief 

provided that sufficient proceeds be turned over to the Trustee sufficient to pay all 

claimants at 100%. 

_June 26, 2019________ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 26th day of June, 2019 mailed a true copy of the 

foregoing Response to the following parties. 

Kia R. Younger 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

4651 Hummingbird Lane 

Unit 166 

Fairfax, VA 22033 

Earl J. Oberbauer, Jr., Esq. 

Counsel for Debtor 

9329 Battle Street 

Manassas, VA 20110 

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 18-14086-KHK Doc 51 Filed 06/26/19 Entered 06/26/19 11:04:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notification of Open Meeting of the National Defense University 
Board of Visitors (BOV)

AGENCY: National Defense University, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting; Date Change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 10, 2011 (76 FR 1408), the Department of Defense 
published a notice of an open meeting of the National Defense 
University (NDU) Board of Visitors. The dates of the meeting have been 
changed and are updated below. The location remains unchanged.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 24 & 25, 2011 from 11:30 a.m. to 
5 p.m. on the 24th and continuing on the 25th from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Board of Visitors meeting will be held at Marshall Hall, 
Building 62, Room 155, the National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue, 
SW., Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The point of contact for this notice 
of Open Meeting is Ms. Joycelyn Stevens @ (202) 685-0079, Fax (202) 
685-3920 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcefc8d9cad9d2cff68bfcd2d8c992d9d8c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6b5928390838895acd1a6888293c8838293">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-8012 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 76.786 What entities are governed by this subpart? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70340 , Aug. 29, 2024.
The regulations in this subpart apply to— ( a ) State educational agencies (SEAs) and local educational agencies (LEAs) that fund charter schools under a covered program, including SEAs and LEAs located in States that do not participate in the Department's Public Charter Schools Program;
( b ) State agencies that are not SEAs, if they are responsible for administering a covered program. State agencies that are not SEAs must comply with the provisions in this subpart that are applicable to SEAs; and
( c ) Charter schools that are scheduled to open or significantly expand their enrollment during the academic year and wish to participate in a covered program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8065a)
EXHIBIT
23.2





CONSENT
OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-143652, 333-61876, 333-153228 and 333-160100) pertaining to the
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, and certain
warrants of RadNet Inc., of our report dated March 31, 2010 with respect to
the combined financial statements of certain RadNet, Inc. affiliates including
Franklin Imaging Joint Venture, Carroll County Radiology, LLC and MRI at St.
Joseph Medical Center, LLC, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the
year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/
Ernst & Young LLP




Los
      Angeles, CaliforniaMarch
      31, 2010
### [§1862. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–200, §3(c), Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1428]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 789, imposed a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment of not more than six months as the penalty for knowingly trespassing upon the reserve known as the Bull Run National Forest in the Cascade Mountains. See note set out under section 482b of Title 16, Conservation, for the remainder of Pub. L. 95–200, including savings provisions therein, which in addition to repealing this section created the Bull Run Watershed Management Unit, Mount Hood National Forest.
#### § 19.203 Amending the dealer registration.

Every proprietor registered as a dealer under this subpart must maintain a current and accurate distilled spirits plant registration. Whenever there is a change to any of the information provided in the proprietor's approved notice of registration, the proprietor must amend the registration within the time period specified in subpart E of this part. An amendment of the proprietor's distilled spirits plant registration will also serve as an amendment of the proprietor's dealer registration under this subpart. The proprietor's dealer registration will also terminate when distilled spirits plant operations under the notice of registration terminate.

(26 U.S.C. 5124)
§ 33.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 33.7 only if— ( 1 ) The Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1); and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 33.3(a) with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to that claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time the claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested in violation of § 33.3(a) does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time includes only those claims arising from the same transaction (*e.g.,* grant, cooperative agreement, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(b), (c))
EXHIBIT 32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc.(the Registrant), I, Steven Jiao, hereby certify that:  1.  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated: May 8, 2007  By:  /s/ Steven Jiao Steven Jiao
Chief Financial Officer
§ 76.106 State documents are public information. A State shall make the following documents available for public inspection: ( a ) All State plans and related official materials.
( b ) All approved subgrant applications.
( c ) All documents that the Secretary transmits to the State regarding a program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
| Subsidiary                                                                   |   | State or Other Jurisdiction of      Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| American Flying Crane      Corporation                                       |   | Delaware                                          |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co.,      Limited                                   |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Gannan Flying Crane Dairy Products      Co., Limited                         |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Langfang Flying Crane Dairy Products Co.,      Limited                       |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Shanxi Feihesantai Biotechnology      Scientific and Commercial Co., Limited |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Beijing Feihe      Biotechnology      Scientific and Commercial Co., Limited |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Qiqihaer Feihe Soybean Co.,      Limited                                     |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Heilongjiang Feihe Kedong Feedlots      Co., Limited                         |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Heilongjiang Feihe Gannan Feedlots      Co., Limited                         |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Heilongjiang Moveup Co.,      Limited                                        |   | China                                             |
|                                                                         |   |                                              |
| Baiquan Feihe Dairy Co.,      Limited                                        |   | China                                             |

----
#### J. E. Melcher v. J. L. Haley.

Filed June 21, 1899.

No. 8952.

U'nauthenticated Transcript of Judgment: Review. A petition in error will be dismissed when the final judgment or order assailed is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court.

Error from the district court of Stanton county. Tried below before Evans, J.

*Dismissed.*

*McNish & Olesou,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. W. Young, contra.*

Nor val, J.

Attached to the record is the certificate of the clerk of the district court stating “that the foregoing is the original bill of exceptions in said cause, and also a true and perfect transcript of the petition, answer, reply, instructions, verdict, motion for a new trial, and order of extension of time in said action, as the same are on file and of record in my office.” It wall be observed that the final judgment in the cause is not authenticated, and for this reason the proceeding in error must be dismissed. *(Bailey v. Eastman,*54 Neb. 416, and cases there cited; *Geneva Nat. Bank v.*Donovan, 53 Neb. 613; *Union P. R. Co. v. Young,*52 Neb. 190; *First Nat. Bank of Pierce v. Noble,*52 Neb. 507.)

Dismissed.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on October 5, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. (ET).

**PLACE:**  The meeting will be conducted by remote means. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**STATUS:**  The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and will be open to the public via webcast.  The Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**  On September 15, 2020, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 34-89868), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.  

The agenda for the meeting will include a potential recommendation concerning TRACE identification of electronic trades, subcommittee observations and lessons learned in the corporate bond market, the bond fund and ETF market, the technology and e-trading markets, and the municipal securities markets, as well as member observations of the fixed income markets. 

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated:  September 28, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
(No. 00139

#### In Re Application of Wayne Earl Moore

*Opinion filed March 28, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

This claim arising out of the death of a fireman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281, *et seq.,*1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at a hearing *392before the full Court on March 15,1978, the Court finds that:

1. The Claimant, Wayne Earl Moore, is the father of the decedent, and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in the application for benefits.

2. The decedent, Floyd Gene Moore, age 22, was a volunteer fireman, a member of the Smithboro Volunteer Fire Department, and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act, on September 28, 1977.

3. On September 28, 1977, at approximately 8:25 p.m., firefighter Moore responded to an alarm of an automobile fire and rode to the fire scene upon the fire truck. As the truck slowed at the fire scene, firefighter Moore fell from the fire truck, as he descended, striking the back of his head on the pavement. Firefighter Moore’s skull was fractured; emergency aid was administered; and he was taken by ambulance to a hospital in St. Louis for special treatment, where he died at 8:40 a.m., the following morning, September 29,1977, without regaining consciousness after his fall. The certificate of death presented, recited the immediate cause of death as “diffuse brain damage and subarachnoid and subdural hemmorrhage,” due to or as a consequence of “occipital bone basilar skull fractures.”

4. Volunteer firefighter Moore was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act.

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $20,000.00 be awarded to Wayne Earl Moore, as father and desig*393nated beneficiary of the deceased fireman, Floyd Gene Moore.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 1.70 General.

All uses of distilled spirits and wines, except as provided in §§ 1.60, 1.61, and 1.62 of this part, are regarded as “nonindustrial.” Such “nonindustrial” use shall include, but not be limited to, distilled spirits or wine used for beverage purposes, or in the manufacture, rectification, or blending of alcoholic beverages; or in the preparation of food or drink by a hotel, restaurant, tavern, or similar establishment; or for sacramental purposes; or as a medicine.
§ 75.708 Subgrants. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70334 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) A grantee may not make a subgrant under a program covered by this part unless authorized by statute or by paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The Secretary may, through an announcement in the Federal Register, authorize subgrants when necessary to meet the purposes of a program. In this announcement, the Secretary will— ( 1 ) Designate the types of entities, e.g., State educational agencies, local educational agencies, institutions of higher education, and nonprofit organizations, to which subgrants can be awarded; and
( 2 ) Indicate whether subgrants can be made to entities identified in an approved application or, without regard to whether the entity is identified in an approved application, have to be selected through a competitive process set out in subgranting procedures established by the grantee.
( c ) If authorized under paragraph (b) of this section, a subgrant is allowed if it will be used by that entity to directly carry out project activities described in that application.
( d ) The grantee, in awarding subgrants under paragraph (b) of this section, must— ( 1 ) Ensure that subgrants are awarded on the basis of an approved budget that is consistent with the grantee's approved application and all applicable Federal statutory, regulatory, and other requirements;
( 2 ) Ensure that every subgrant includes any conditions required by Federal statute and executive orders and their implementing regulations; and
( 3 ) Ensure that subgrantees are aware of requirements imposed upon them by Federal statute and regulation, including the Federal anti-discrimination laws enforced by the Department.
( e ) A grantee may contract for supplies, equipment, construction, and other services, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart D—Post Federal Award Requirements (2 CFR 200.317-200.326, Procurement Standards).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 27804, July 24, 1987; 64 FR 50392, Sept. 16, 1999; 78 FR 49534, Aug. 13, 2013; 79 FR 76093, Dec. 19, 2014]
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Yvon Leveille, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Adsero Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: August 24, 2005          /s/ Yvon Leveille
                                        ------------------
                                        Yvon Leveille
                                        Principal Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 159

 160

 155

 155

 157

 155

 155

 171

 162

 166

 165

 160

 151

 147

 145

 144

 141

 148

 147

 146

 143

 146

 142

 145

 149

 146

 151

 154

 152

 147

 146

 152

 151

 152

 151

 151

 148

 147

 134

 150

 148

 151

 131

 114

 124

 141

 135

 135

 134

 132

 130

 129

 127

 130

 129

 141

 137

 140

 145

 144

 140

 134

 156

 156

 154

 153

 153

 151

 149

 148

 156

 157

 156

 154

 142

 139

 143

 139

 137

 138

 136

 135

 133

 132

 134

 136

 144

 143

 145

 150

 148

 144

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,264

 2,264

 2,261

 2,254

 2,245

 2,230

 2,215

 2,200

 2,189

 2,181

 2,173

 2,162

 2,144

 2,124

 2,111

 2,094

 2,077

 2,062

 2,045

 2,029

 2,013

 1,997

 1,975

 1,954

 1,942

 1,931

 1,934

 1,945

 1,950

 1,955

 1,957

 162

 162

 162

 161

 160

 159

 158

 157

 156

 156

 155

 154

 153

 152

 151

 150

 148

 147

 146

 145

 144

 143

 141

 140

 139

 138

 138

 139

 139

 140

 140

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER