alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors

Paramco Financial Group Inc.

(a Delaware corporation)





We have made a review of the consolidated unaudited balance sheet of Paramco Financial Group Inc., as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated unaudited statements of operations for the three and six months period ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and from inception (April 22, 1996) to June 30, 2004 and the unaudited statement of cashflows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and from inception (April 22, 1996) to June 30, 2004 , in accordance with the standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of management.



We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical review procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in accordance with Public Company Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Clyde Bailey P.C.

San Antonio, Texas January 18, 2005
Advance
      Agreement

    


    Party
      A:  Wei
      Li

    Party
      B:  Kiwa
      Bio-Tech Products (Shandong) Co., Ltd.

    


    The
      Advance Agreement is signed on June 30, 2007 by both parties, to clarify the
      following advance transactions:

     

    
      	
            	1.	
              During
                June 2007, Party A advanced an aggregate sum of RMB 336,432.46 (i.e.
                US$44,177.33) to Party B in China.

            


    

     

    
      	
            	2.	
              Both
                parties agreed the abovementioned advances bear interest at 6% per
                annum
                starting from June 30, 2007. Party A agreed that Party B could repay
                the
                advances aperiodically when the Company’s cash flow circumstances permit.
                At the same time Party B agreed to settle the advances within 180
                days
                since June 30, 2007. 

            


    

     

    
      	
            	3.	
              Both
                parties agreed that Party B will issue to Party A warrants that entitle
                Party A to purchase up to 220,886 shares of common stock based on
                the
                conversion price specified in Clause 4. Party A shall have the right
                to
                exercise the warrants within next 24
                months.

            


    

     

    
      	
            	4.	
              Conversion:
                At the option and instruction of Party A, Party A shall at any time
                make
                an application to exercise any warrants for the issuance of shares
                of
                Party B’s holding company, Kiwa Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation
                (“KWBT”). Party A shall have the right to exercise the warrants based on
                a
                conversion price equal to the closing quote (US$0.1055) of the shares
                of
                KWBT, listed on the Over-the-counter Bulletin Board (the “Shares”) on June
                29, 2007. Party A shall have unlimited piggyback right.
                

            


    

     

     

    
      	 	
              Party
                A:

            	
              Wei
                Li

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
               

            	
              /s/    
                Wei Li

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Party
                B:

            	
              Kiwa
                Bio-Tech Products (Shandong) Co. Ltd.

            
	 	 	 	 
	 	
               

            	
              /s/     
                Lianjun Luo

            	 
	 	 	
              Director

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Date:      
                June
                30,
                2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

d0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

146213

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146213

COA: 311489 

Lapeer CC: 11-010650-FH

SCOTT CRAIG STEVENS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of April 29, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 

2012 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People 

v Earl (Docket No. 145677). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

March 26, 2014, 495 Mich 33 (2014), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 897

 889

 894

 876

 840

 758

 742

 749

 751

 750

 781

 751

 733

 749

 745

 736

 742

 706

 714

 709

 702

 692

 672

 672

 674

 668

 661

 654

 668

 681

 744

 745

 748

 654

 524

 474

 449

 519

 540

 505

 427

 457

 416

 445

 437

 472

 400

 418

 450

 480

 514

 569

 589

 594

 600

 584

 578

 573

 568

 563

 794

 786

 794

 759

 704

 668

 671

 681

 685

 680

 659

 668

 651

 657

 669

 660

 609

 614

 643

 633

 647

 626

 628

 633

 635

 628

 615

 611

 615

 623

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 11, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 507

 502

 507

 485

 451

 429

 431

 437

 439

 436

 423

 429

 418

 422

 429

 424

 392

 395

 413

 407

 416

 403

 404

 407

 408

 404

 396

 394

 396

 401

TOTAL 19,946

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Amendment Number One to Restricted Stock Bonus Plan


 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE 
 ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 
 RESTRICTED STOCK BONUS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Alfa Mutual Insurance Company (the “Company”) maintains the Alfa Mutual Insurance Company Restricted Stock Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the Company may
amend or terminate the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Plan to provide that effective November 4, 2007 no new
deferral elections will be allowed under the Plan due to execution of the merger agreement regarding the proposed merger of Alfa Corporation with a subsidiary of the Company and Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Section 3 is amended effective November 4, 2007 by adding to the end of paragraphs (a) and (b) thereof the following: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, no new deferral elections may be made
effective November 4, 2007.” 
 2. All of the terms of the Plan not herein amended shall remain in full force and effect.

 This the 4th day of November, 2007. 
  

			
	 ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
  

		
	By:	 	    /s/ Jerry A. Newby
		
	Its:	 	    President and Chief Executive Officer
		 	


  
  

			
	 ATTEST:
  

		
	By:	 	    /s/ Angela L. Cooner
		
	Its:	 	    Vice President and Associate General Counsel
Case 19-31632-KRH Doc 7 Filed 03/29/19 Entered 03/29/19 16:03:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 668.39 Study abroad programs. A student enrolled in a program of study abroad is eligible to receive title IV, HEA program assistance if— ( a ) The student remains enrolled as a regular student in an eligible program at an eligible institution during his or her program of study abroad; and
( b ) The eligible institution approves the program of study abroad for academic credit. However, the study abroad program need not be required as part of the student's eligible degree program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091(o))
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: LECLAIRRYAN PLLC, Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

 Chapter 7 

Debtor. 

 

LYNN L. TAVENNER, Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142-KRH 

as Chapter 7 Trustee, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ULX PARTNERS, LLC, et. al, 

 Defendants. 

 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS

For the reason stated on the record in open court on May 31, 2022, the hearings on the 

following matters: 

1. In re LeClairRyan PLLC, Case No. 19-34574: Motion of the United States 

Trustee for a Status Conference and a Scheduling Order [ECF No. 1335]; and 

2. Tavenner v. ULX Partners, LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142: Motion of the United 

States Trustee for a Status Conference and a Scheduling Order [ECF No. 217] 

are hereby CONTINUED to Wednesday, June 1, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. (the “Hearings”). 

It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file a statement in both In re LeClairRyan 

PLLC, Case No. 19-34574, and Tavenner v. ULX Partners, LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142, as 

soon as practicable but in no event later than Wednesday, June 1, 2022, at 12:00 p.m., 

informing the Court whether such Hearings are going forward or whether such Hearings can be 

cancelled as resolved. To the extent that Hearings are going forward, pursuant to the Protocol in 

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1355 Filed 05/31/22 Entered 05/31/22 12:10:21 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Response to Public Health Emergency,

1

 the Hearings will be conducted via Zoom for 

Government. Persons seeking to appear or participate at the Hearings must register in advance 

via the following link: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItdeyhqD8pG8z0vkiGkz7XabbZNwBYV_8

In addition, a listen-only conference line will be available: 

Dial: 1-866-590-5055

Access Code: 4377075 

Security Code: 6122 

DATED: May 31, 2022 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

Entered on Docket: 

1

 A copy of the Protocol in Response to Public Health Emergency is available on the Court’s website at 

https://www.vaeb.uscourts.gov/sites/vaeb/files/GO20-5Rich.pdf. 

 May 31 2022

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1355 Filed 05/31/22 Entered 05/31/22 12:10:21 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
_____________________________________ 

Page _135_____ is not included in this copy. 

Pages through __ are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) ____ &____. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

______ Blank page 

 * The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________ 
*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 5, 2011. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Guaranteed Disaster Assistance Program Payment Reporting.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    SBA Form Number: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: Small Businesses that have experienced 
a physical or economic disaster in a federally declared disaster.
    Responses: 5,580.
    Annual Burden: 467.
    Title: Immediate Disaster Assistance Loan Program Application and 
Eligibility Data.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    SBA Form Numbers: 2410, 2411, 2412.
    Description of Respondents: Small Businesses that have experienced 
a physical or economic disaster in a federally declared disaster.
    Responses: 984.
    Annual Burden: 543.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011-8092 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 490.607 National performance management measures to assess freight movement on the Interstate System.

The performance measure to assess freight movement on the Interstate System is the: Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index (referred to as the Freight Reliability measure).
#### Martin Klein, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine Priest, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 52,447. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Third Division.

February 8, 1968.

*75Eugene K. Landenberger, of Chicago, for appellant;

no brief filed for appellee.

Opinion by Not to be published in full.

JUSTICE SULLIVAN.
### §1438. Unlawful return of foreign vessel's papers

It shall not be lawful for any foreign consul to deliver to the master of any foreign vessel the register, or document in lieu thereof, deposited with him in accordance with the provisions of section 1434 of this title, or regulations issued thereunder, until such master shall produce to him a clearance in due form from the Customs Service in the port in which such vessel has entered. Any consul offending against the provisions of this section shall be liable to a fine of not more than $5,000.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §438, 46 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §654, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2210.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §438, 42 Stat. 952. That section was superseded by section 438 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–182 substituted "section 1434" for "section 1435", inserted ", or regulations issued thereunder," before "until such master", and substituted "the Customs Service in the port in which such vessel has entered" for "the appropriate customs officer of the port where such vessel has been entered".

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to appropriate customs officers for reference to collector.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.
§ 694.16 What are the requirements for redistribution or return of scholarship funds not awarded to a project's eligible students? The following requirements apply only to section 404E scholarship awards for grantees whose initial GEAR UP grant awards were made on or after August 14, 2008, and to any section 404E scholarship awards for grantees whose initial GEAR UP grant awards were made prior to August 14, 2008, but who, pursuant to § 694.12(b)(2), elect to use the § 694.14 requirements (rather than the § 694.13 requirements): ( a ) Scholarship funds held in reserve by States under § 694.14(c) or by Partnerships under section 404D(b)(7) of the HEA that are not used by eligible students as defined in § 694.14(b) within six years of the students' scheduled completion of secondary school may be redistributed by the grantee to other eligible students.
( b ) Any Federal scholarship funds that are not used by eligible students within six years of the students' scheduled completion of secondary school, and are not redistributed by the grantee to other eligible students, must be returned to the Secretary within 45 days after the six-year period for expending the scholarship funds expires.
( c ) Grantees that reserve funds for scholarships must annually furnish information, as the Secretary may require, on the amount of Federal and non-Federal funds reserved and held for GEAR UP scholarships and the disbursement of these scholarship funds to eligible students until these funds are fully expended or returned to the Secretary.
( d ) A scholarship fund is subject to audit or monitoring by authorized representatives of the Secretary throughout the life of the fund.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-25(e))
[75 FR 65800, Oct. 26, 2010]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-21031

Conference Calendar

 

JUAN VALENZUELA FLORES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LUTHER A. MASTERS; DR. MASTER; DR. VICTOR

ZIMA; CAPTAIN JAMES; CHARLES K; SERGEANT WILLIAMS;

DONALD G,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-1973

--------------------

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Valenzuela Flores, Texas prisoner # 608260, appeals the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted. The appellant argues

that his back problem was aggravated because he was required to

work more than four hours per day and that the defendants did not

grant his request for a four-hour work day restriction until

after he threatened to file suit against them. He does not

dispute that his current work restrictions include: a four-hour
No. 00-21031

-2-

work day; no lifting over 25 pounds; no squatting; no walking on

wet, uneven surfaces; no working around machines with moving

parts; no exposure to loud noises; and no work requiring complex

instructions. Even if the appellant’s allegations are taken as

true, he has not alleged a constitutional violation as he does

not allege that prison officials knowingly forced him to perform

work assignments which were inconsistent with his work

restrictions or that they knowingly imposed work restrictions

that were beyond his physical capabilities. See Jackson v. Cain,

864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989); Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d

191, 194 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if the defendants were negligent

in establishing his work restrictions or making his job

assignment, such negligence is not unconstitutional. See

Jackson, 864 F.2d at 1246. Therefore, the district court did not

err in dismissing his action for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted. The appellant’s conclusional

allegations that he was treated differently from nondisabled

prisoners do not state an equal protection claim as he has not

alleged any specific facts to show when or how he was treated

differently from other nondisabled prisoners. See Mayabb v.

Johnson, 168 F.3d 863, 870 (5th Cir.)(a violation of equal

protection occurs only when the governmental action in question

classifies or distinguishes between two or more relevant persons

or groups, or when a classification impermissibly interferes with

a fundamental right), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 (1999).

AFFIRMED.