alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* 

# S

# TAT

# E OF N

# EVA 

# DA jim Gibbons, Governor Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Allen Biaggi, Director ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DlVlSlON OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Leo M.Drozdoff; PE., Administrator protecting the future for generations December 4,2009 Laura Yoshii Acting Regional Administrator OAR-1,USEPA Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94 105 Dear Ms. Yoshii: On behalf of Governor Gibbons, as his appointed designee, this letter transmits to you two hard copies and one compact disc of Washoe County's portion ofNevada's PM2 5 infrastructure state implementation plan (SIP). Additionally, the infrastructure SIP may be viewed on Washoe County's website at http://ww.co.washoe.nv.us/healthlaqm/hone.html. This SIP addresses the 2006 24-hour 

### PM2j national ambient air quality standards. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection requests that EPA Region IX approve Washoe County's PM25 infi-astructureSIP into the Nevada State Implementation Plan. The infrastructure SIP is being submitted pursuant to sections 1 1 O(a)(l ) and (2) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 and was prepared in accordance with EPA guidance dated September 29,2003. The following documents are included: Attachment tZ - Current CAA 11 O(a)(2)(A)-(M)Requirements in the Washoe County Portion of the Nevada PM25 SIP Attachment 

### R - Washoe County Regulations Supporting CAA 

### 11 O(a)(2)(A)-(M) Requirements Attachment C 

### - Delegation of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program Agreement Attachrnerlr 

### D - Inter-Local Agreement Supporting CA.4 1

### I O(a)(,)(A)-(M) Requirements If you should have any questions about this submittal or require additional clarificataon, you may contact Andrew Goodrich or Daniel Inouye ofthe Washoe County District Health Department at 775-784-7200.

dr Administrator Enclosures

901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001 Carson City, Nevada 89701 p: 775.687.4670 f: 775.687.5856 www.ndep.nv.gov %&% pr~nted on recycled paper --- A 

## -

# .. 

# . Page 2 Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA R-IX December 3, 2009

cc (W/O enclosures): Robin Reedy, Chief of Staff, Office of the Governor Allen Biaggi, Director, DCNR Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP Andrew Goodrich, Director, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County DHD Daniel Inouye, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County DHD Lisa Hanf, AIR-2, Chief, Planning Office, Air Division, EPA Region IX Certified Mail No. 7008 1140 0004 4031 2539
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. William Capp,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ F. William Capp     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| F. William Capp         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| August 9, 2010     |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 276

 396

 424

 644

 939

 1,136

 1,157

 1,283

 1,197

 766

 713

 550

 517

 509

 350

 829

 1,072

 994

 1,394

 1,452

 1,618

 1,241

 1,482

 1,427

 757

 939

 623

 612

 639

 802

 898

 214

 209

 211

 213

 230

 236

 249

 247

 251

 240

 259

 227

 229

 238

 231

 237

 237

 225

 226

 259

 246

 230

 240

 238

 234

 250

 244

 240

 242

 231

 244

 227

 233

 245

 289

 362

 445

 473

 441

 470

 400

 391

 335

 299

 288

 253

 317

 363

 412

 504

 611

 656

 473

 558

 581

 387

 459

 366

 311

 310

 301

 344

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,434

 3,430

 3,423

 3,459

 3,584

 3,788

 4,009

 4,202

 4,430

 4,588

 4,729

 4,809

 4,845

 4,898

 4,924

 5,008

 5,126

 5,249

 5,391

 5,557

 5,740

 5,772

 5,860

 6,041

 6,037

 6,161

 6,228

 6,251

 6,308

 6,292

 6,273

 245

 245

 245

 247

 256

 271

 286

 300

 316

 328

 338

 344

 346

 350

 352

 358

 366

 375

 385

 397

 410

 412

 419

 432

 431

 440

 445

 447

 451

 449

 448

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6427

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR OF THE VDOC; FRED W. GREEN, Warden;

SAMUEL L. BATTS, Assistant Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-95-963-2)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th

Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the

case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee

order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BRIAN GALLAGHER,

Petitioner

v.

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by the Petitioner, are: 

(1) Whether the “household vehicle exclusion” violates Section 1738 of the 

Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) where 

GEICO issued all household policies and unilaterally decided to issue two 

separate policies, when the insured desired stacking, elected stacking, 

paid additional premiums for stacking and never knowingly waived 

stacking of underinsured motorist benefits?

(2) Whether the “household vehicle exclusion” impermissibly narrows or conflicts 

with the statutory mandates of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility 

Law and the evidence of record is that GEICO was fully aware of the risks of insuring a 

motorcycle in the same household as other family vehicles but unilaterally decided to 

write a separate motorcycle policy?
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.91

 1,198.76

 1,198.99

 1,198.90

 1,198.91

 1,198.82

 1,198.72

 1,198.67

 1,198.63

 1,198.61

 1,198.59

 1,199.42

 1,199.40

 1,199.02

 1,198.85

 1,198.79

 1,198.74

 1,198.69

 1,198.65

 1,198.62

 1,198.60

 1,198.59

 1,198.59

 1,198.57

 1,198.55

 1,198.54

 1,198.52

 1,198.51

 1,198.52

 1,198.52

 49.51

 49.24

 49.65

 49.49

 49.51

 49.35

 49.17

 49.08

 49.01

 48.98

 48.94

 50.42

 50.39

 49.70

 49.40

 49.29

 49.21

 49.12

 49.05

 48.99

 48.96

 48.94

 48.94

 48.90

 48.87

 48.85

 48.82

 48.80

 48.82

 48.82

STORAGE

+0.46

-0.27

+0.41

-0.16

+0.02

-0.16

-0.18

-0.09

-0.07

-0.04

-0.04

+1.49

-0.04

-0.69

-0.30

-0.11

-0.09

-0.09

-0.07

-0.05

-0.04

-0.02

+0.00

-0.04

-0.04

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

935

370

1,023

610

712

498

369

353

315

313

291

2,350

1,539

525

477

476

438

376

345

317

303

300

305

268

242

245

223

225

250

238

INFLOW

 701

 500

 817

 686

 701

 576

 452

 393

 347

 325

 302

 1,600

 1,557

 862

 616

 524

 476

 416

 370

 336

 314

 302

 302

 279

 258

 248

 229

 219

 229

 229

SPILL

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

OUTLET

 1

 3

 0

 3

 1

 2

 5

 3

 3

 5

 6

 0

 0

 8

 12

 5

 5

 4

 9

 7

 6

 6

 2

 6

 1

 5

 11

 14

 11

 8

C.F.S.

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .04

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .08

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .20

 .09

 .09

 .07

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .10

 .04

 .10

 .02

 .08

 .19

 .24

 .20

 .14

INCHES

 .48

 .00

 .83

 .01

 .35

 .03

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .11

 1.74

 .54

 .00

 .11

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/09/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.27 15,231 30 15,166 152 2.64 4.49

ACRE-FEET -270 30,211 60 30,082 301

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 30,082

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 30,142

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.49

JULY 1, 2005 22.92

 49.05
#### § 655.32 What additional factors does the Secretary consider in making grant awards?

Except for 34 CFR parts 656, 657, and 661, to the extent practicable and consistent with the criterion of excellence, the Secretary seeks to achieve an equitable distribution of funds throughout the Nation.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1126(b)).

[58 FR 32575, June 10, 1993]
CBP Office of Administration

Facilities Management and Engineering

Tactical Infrastructure Environmental Stewardship

Presented to

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

March 11, 2010
Life Cycle Environmental Stewardship 

Approach for Tactical Infrastructure

• Pre-planning

• Walked the ground with stakeholders 

• Project Planning

• Produced NEPA documents and Environmental Stewardship Plans

• Public meetings

• Continuous coordination with resource agencies (USFWS; State Agencies, Tribes, etc)

• Performed surveys

• During Construction

• Best Management Practices part of contracts

• Environmental Awareness training for contractors

• Third party environmental monitors 

• Post Construction

• Preparing Environmental Stewardship Summary Reports to document final footprint and compare planned versus 

actual

• Drainage Improvement Projects to minimize erosion and flood risk

• Re-vegetation and slope stabilization

• Maintenance and Repair

• Best Management Practices in contracts

• Environmental Awareness Training for contractors

• Full NEPA where lacking appropriate coverage

2
Example Environmental Stewardship Actions

for PF 225 and VF300

• Prepared 8 final and another 10 draft NEPA documents and 22 ESPs 

• Provided 36 environmental training courses to contractors before construction

• Conducted well over 90,000 hours of onsite environmental monitors during 

construction

• Identified and documented over 350 archeological sites and surveyed over 

13,000 acres and excavated 56 sites before construction

• Developed Best Management Practices (BMPs) with the USFWS and prepared 

and shared Biological Resources Plans that evaluated over 75 threatened and 

endangered species and 25 critical habitats

3
4

Protecting Endangered Monodella

San Diego A-1
5

CBP Biologist Surveys for Endangered Quino Butterfly

San Diego A-1
6

Environmental Monitor Moves Birds from Construction Corridor 

El Centro
7

Temporary Caps on Bollard Posts to Prevent 

Animals from being Trapped
8

Transplanting Agave Cactus

Coronado National Memorial
Mormon House Site Excavation, Arizona

Before Excavation After Excavation
Mormon House Final Capping, Arizona
11

Fence Constructed While Protecting Historic 

Border Monument
12

Wildlife Panels (“Deer Fence”)

New Mexico
Department of Agriculture Field Test

Carrizo Cane Control

Laredo, Texas

Brown cage shows cane 

without exposure to 

wasp; foreground shows 

effect on cane with wasp 

control
14

Wildlife Passage (“Cat Hole”)

Rio Grande Valley
15

Sabal Palm Salvage

Rio Grande Valley
Post Fence Construction Drainage Improvements
17

“Smugglers Gulch” San Diego 

May February 2010 2009
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Understanding IRI household-based and store-based scanner data**** 
SuDocNumber:A1.36:1942
ItemNumber:0016(online)
CGPSystem Number:001003616
 
Full
Summary
 **
#### § 303.708 State enforcement.

Nothing in this subpart may be construed to restrict a State from utilizing any other authority available to it to monitor and enforce the requirements of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(1)(C), 1442)
(April 16, 1943.)

#### Betty Davis et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of Columbia Pictures Corporation, Respondents and Appellants, v. Jack Cohn et al., Appellants and Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present •— Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER II—IMPORT HEALTH AND SAFETY
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-825 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NARCOTIC DRUGS 

Cooperating Nation Information 

Exchange System 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Santo Domingo November 9, 2005 and 

August 25, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 DOMNICAN REPUBLIC 

 Narcotic Drugs: Cooperating Nation 

 Information Exchange System 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Santo Domingo November 9, 2005 

 and August 25, 2006; 

 Entered into force August 25, 2006.
§ 75.217 How the Secretary selects applications for new grants. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70326 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary selects applications for new grants on the basis of the authorizing statute, the selection criteria, and any priorities or other requirements that have been published in the Federal Register and apply to the selection of those applications.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Secretary may use experts to evaluate the applications submitted under a program.
( 2 ) These experts may include persons who are not employees of the Federal Government.
( c ) The Secretary prepares a rank order of the applications based solely on the evaluation of their quality according to the selection criteria.
( d ) The Secretary then determines the order in which applications will be selected for grants. The Secretary considers the following in making these determinations: ( 1 ) The information in each application.
( 2 ) The rank ordering of the applications.
( 3 ) Any other information— ( i ) Relevant to a criterion, priority, or other requirement that applies to the selection of applications for new grants;
( ii ) Concerning the applicant's performance and use of funds under a previous award under any Department program; and
( iii ) Concerning the applicant's failure under any Department program to submit a performance report or its submission of a performance report of unacceptable quality.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[52 FR 27804, July 24, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 4167, Jan. 29, 1997]
### Request for Information Daytona Be ach Kennel Club Inc (FAA-2015-4740) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Dear Mr. Grimm: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA − 2015 − 4740). This information is necessary for the Fede ral Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your p etition. z Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed - wing, rotorcraft, lighter - than - air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information described above by December 31, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please f eel free to contac t me at (202) 267–2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : T hursday , December 17, 2015 7:16 AM To: j grimm@delawarenorth.com
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In Re: Christelle Ndoumbe CASE NO. 19-34214-KRH

MOTION TO DISMISS,

NOTICE OF MOTION AND NOTICE OF THE HEARING

NOW COMES the Chapter 13 Trustee and moves this Court to dismiss this case as provided in

11 U.S.C. 1307(c)(6) as the debtor(s) are in default in making the payments under the plan.

Inasmuch as the legal basis for this motion is cited herein, it is respectfully requested that the

requirement of a separate memorandum of law in support of this motion be waived.

Y o u r r i g h t s m a y b e a f f e c t e d . You should read these papers carefully and discuss them with

your attorney, if you have one in this bankruptcy case. (If you do not have an attorney, you may wish

to consult one.)

If you do not want the court to grant the relief sought in the motion, or if you want the court to

consider your views on the motion, then on or before seven (7) days before the date of the hearing, you or

your attorney must:

 xFile with the court, at the address shown below, a written response pursuant to Local Bankruptcy

Rule 9013-1(H). If you mail your response to the court for filing, you must mail it early enough so the

court will receive it on or before the date stated above.

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

701 East Broad Street, Suite 4000

Richmond, VA 23219

You must also mail a copy to:

Suzanne E. Wade, Chapter 13 Trustee

7202 Glen Forest Dr. STE 202

Richmond, VA 23226

Suzanne E. Wade

Chapter 13 Trustee

7202 Glen Forest Dr. STE 202

Richmond, VA 23226

(804) 775-0979

VSBN #31868

Case 19-34214-KRH Doc 31 Filed 03/01/21 Entered 03/01/21 14:55:38 Desc

Page 1 of 2
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A HEARING ON THIS MOTION

WILL BE HELD AT U. S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, U. S. COURTHOUSE,

ROOM 5 0 0 0, 701 EAST BROAD STREET, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219,

ON April 07, 2021, AT 11:15 AM

I f n o t i m e l y r e s p o n s e h a s b e e n f i l e d o p p o s i n g t h e r e l i e f r e q u e s t e d , t h e C o u r t

may grant the relief requested in the motion.

If you or your attorney do not take these steps, the court may decide that you do not oppose the relief

sought in the motion and may enter an order granting that relief.

/s/ Suzanne E. Wade

Dated: March 1, 2021 _______________________

Suzanne E. Wade

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this 1 s t d a y o f M a r c h , 2 0 2 1, mailed or hand-delivered a true copy of the

foregoing Notice of Motion to the debtor(s) C h r i s t e l l e N d o u m b e , 7 1 1 1 S e n n W a y , M e c h a n i c s v i l l e , V A

2 3 1 1 1, a n d d e bt or(s) att or n e y, S C O T T W I L D E R C A R P E N T E R , E S Q . , e - m a i l :

SCOTT@NEWDAYLEGAL.COM.

/s/ Suzanne E. Wade

____________________________

Suzanne E. Wade

Suzanne E. Wade

Chapter 13 Trustee

7202 Glen Forest Dr. STE 202

Richmond, VA 23226

(804) 775-0979

VSBN #31868

Case 19-34214-KRH Doc 31 Filed 03/01/21 Entered 03/01/21 14:55:38 Desc

Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 157

 161

 170

 176

 179

 180

 190

 191

 192

 188

 184

 186

 183

 182

 180

 177

 180

 179

 179

 177

 177

 183

 175

 181

 187

 179

 198

 191

 183

 190

 147

 153

 160

 166

 173

 174

 176

 181

 180

 177

 175

 174

 174

 174

 170

 169

 169

 169

 167

 166

 165

 165

 164

 164

 164

 164

 166

 167

 168

 166

 152

 156

 165

 172

 175

 177

 183

 186

 184

 180

 179

 178

 177

 178

 175

 172

 173

 173

 172

 171

 170

 172

 168

 169

 170

 169

 173

 173

 173

 173

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 1,953

 1,982

 2,021

 2,064

 2,105

 2,147

 2,194

 2,243

 2,287

 2,321

 2,353

 2,383

 2,412

 2,442

 2,465

 2,481

 2,489

 2,490

 2,487

 2,481

 2,468

 2,454

 2,438

 2,427

 2,418

 2,409

 2,405

 2,400

 2,398

 2,399

 140

 142

 144

 147

 150

 153

 157

 160

 163

 166

 168

 170

 172

 174

 176

 177

 178

 178

 178

 177

 176

 175

 174

 173

 173

 172

 172

 171

 171

 171

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER