alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Suzanne Lloyd HAYES, as Trustee of the Harold Lloyd Trust, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 01-55709. D.C. No. CV-00-11517-R.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 13, 2002.

Decided May 10, 2002.

*377Before KOZINSKI and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and BREYER, District Judge *.

*

 The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

A district court may dispose of a case under Rule 12 by reference to documents “whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions” without treating the motion as one for summary judgment. *Parrino v. FHP, Inc.,*146 F.3d 699, 705-06 (9th Cir.1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). When considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a district court “may consider facts that ‘are contained in materials of which the court may take judicial notice.’ ” *Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.,*189 F.3d 971, 981 n. 18 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting *Barron v. Reich,*13 F.3d 1370, 1377 (9th Cir.1994)). Consequently, the district court could reach the question of whether *The Freshman*and *The Waterboy*were substantially similar without converting Disney’s motion into a motion for summary judgment.

After a painstaking (and occasionally painful) de novo review, we agree with the district court that Disney is entitled to judgment on the pleadings. Any similarities between the two films are insubstantial and insufficient as a matter of law to support a claim for copyright infringement. *See Norse v. Henry Holt & Co.,*991 F.2d 563, 566 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 635

 603

 611

 546

 510

 482

 546

 498

 506

 540

 600

 676

 648

 617

 632

 671

 704

 752

 769

 770

 780

 768

 793

 811

 836

 829

 854

 818

 812

 809

 454

 457

 459

 460

 448

 434

 423

 426

 434

 432

 449

 455

 454

 439

 425

 417

 410

 408

 403

 436

 422

 395

 390

 393

 389

 389

 375

 374

 375

 379

 496

 496

 502

 493

 480

 462

 468

 458

 468

 474

 486

 497

 507

 504

 506

 509

 515

 539

 559

 572

 563

 531

 517

 516

 521

 522

 514

 507

 510

 515

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 323

 323

 326

 321

 313

 302

 305

 299

 305

 309

 316

 323

 329

 327

 329

 331

 334

 349

 361

 369

 364

 344

 336

 335

 338

 339

 334

 329

 331

 334

TOTAL 15,207

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt & Company Holdings (the “Company”),for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•                  TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: November 9, 2005

 
| /s/ John J.  Haley                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John J. Haley                          |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| /s/ Carl D.  Mautz                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Carl D. Mautz                               |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Watson Wyatt & Company Holdings and will be retained byWatson Wyatt & Company Holdings and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00240

- CV

James L. Mundie Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§ From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F

- 2001

- 022 7

- C)

December 22, 2016

Opinion by Justi ce Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 4, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Lucinda Hill Alden, Los Angeles, California, as trustee for The 
Gilbert D. Hill Descendant's Trust, The Roberta E. Hill Descendant's 
Trust, The Julie Hill Irrevocable Trust Dated April 7, 2003, and the 
Lucinda Hill Irrevocable Trust Dated April 7, 2003, all of Los Angeles, 
California, to retain control of Newell Bancshares, Inc., Newell, Iowa, 
and thereby indirectly control First Community Bank, Newell, Iowa.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Scott T. Athey, Enid, Oklahoma, to acquire control of Security 
Financial Services Corporation, parent of The Security National Bank of 
Enid, both in Enid, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 16, 
2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-6541 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 9,776

 9,405

 8,735

 7,989

 7,216

 7,332

 7,993

 8,588

 8,482

 8,870

 8,649

 7,864

 7,534

 7,299

 6,785

 6,590

 6,408

 7,727

 7,674

 7,553

 7,618

 7,732

 7,734

 7,356

 7,365

 7,474

 7,152

 7,267

 7,619

 7,375

 7,020

 1,730

 1,902

 1,651

 1,612

 1,589

 1,440

 1,545

 1,547

 997

 1,523

 1,269

 986

 1,139

 1,018

 879

 1,396

 1,670

 1,770

 1,817

 1,763

 1,923

 1,591

 1,329

 1,064

 917

 1,053

 876

 1,258

 1,506

 1,368

 1,164

 5,945

 5,864

 5,755

 5,043

 3,825

 4,119

 4,162

 4,526

 4,459

 4,840

 4,818

 4,285

 3,940

 3,872

 3,464

 3,694

 3,935

 4,543

 4,564

 4,333

 4,426

 4,241

 3,955

 3,685

 3,623

 3,658

 3,597

 3,690

 4,039

 3,833

 3,800

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 62,707

 63,920

 65,653

 66,786

 66,786

 67,261

 68,253

 69,382

 69,657

 69,953

 70,008

 69,127

 67,401

 65,453

 62,972

 60,802

 58,982

 58,482

 59,221

 59,435

 59,699

 59,414

 58,910

 57,755

 56,560

 55,933

 55,590

 55,408

 55,983

 56,122

 55,987

 4,479

 4,566

 4,690

 4,770

 4,770

 4,804

 4,875

 4,956

 4,976

 4,997

 5,001

 4,938

 4,814

 4,675

 4,498

 4,343

 4,213

 4,177

 4,230

 4,245

 4,264

 4,244

 4,208

 4,125

 4,040

 3,995

 3,971

 3,958

 3,999

 4,009

 3,999

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 23, 2010 | By: /s/ Cery B. Perle                                                                                                                |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Cery B. PerlePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal executive officer, principal financialand accounting officer) |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00399-CR

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER 

WILLIAMS

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Robert Christopher Williams pled guilty pursuant to a plea 

bargain to felony driving while intoxicated, and the trial court sentenced him to 

ten years’ confinement, probated for ten years. Almost three years later, the 

State filed a petition for revocation, alleging several violations of the conditions of 

community supervision. Appellant pled true to allegations that he failed to report 

in the months of June, October, and December 2009 and February, May, June, 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

and July 2010; failed to pay community supervision fees in the months of May, 

June, July, August, September, November, and December 2009 and January, 

February, March, April, May, June, and July 2010; and failed to submit urine 

samples on July 10, 2009, and during the weeks of March 18, March 25, April 22, 

April 29, September 2, September 9, September 16, September 23, and 

September 30 of 2009. After a hearing, the trial court revoked Appellant’s 

community supervision and sentenced him to eight years’ confinement.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel 

avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief 

and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California

2

by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds for relief.3 This court afforded Appellant the opportunity to file a pro se 

response to the Anders brief, and he did so. The State also filed a letter brief in 

response to Appellant’s pro se allegations.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we 

are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if 

 

2

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510–11 & n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1991).
3

there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.4 Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.5

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, Appellant’s pro se 

response, and the State’s letter brief. We agree with counsel that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might 

arguably support the appeal.6 Consequently, we grant the motion to withdraw 

and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 15, 2011

 

4See id. at 511.

5See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

6See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 539

 518

 531

 531

 532

 543

 544

 557

 563

 560

 553

 556

 574

 571

 572

 572

 559

 575

 606

 623

 650

 652

 658

 657

 678

 715

 607

 653

 703

 646

 415

 431

 463

 444

 420

 415

 453

 484

 471

 464

 463

 486

 467

 533

 491

 512

 510

 525

 565

 604

 609

 607

 602

 590

 598

 599

 572

 583

 612

 601

 486

 484

 498

 495

 481

 480

 499

 528

 515

 515

 515

 535

 531

 562

 530

 549

 537

 551

 588

 611

 628

 627

 626

 615

 626

 666

 583

 598

 679

 621

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 316

 315

 324

 322

 313

 313

 324

 342

 334

 334

 334

 347

 344

 363

 344

 355

 348

 357

 379

 394

 404

 403

 403

 396

 403

 428

 376

 386

 436

 400

TOTAL 16,759

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §3441. Jury; number of jurors; waiver—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Jury trial, waiver, twelve jurors or less by written stipulation, trial by court on general or special findings, Rule 23.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 832.)
#### In the Matter of the Application and Petition of John A. Bensel and Others, Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to Acquire Real Estate, etc., in the Towns of Yorktown and New Castle, Westchester County, etc.

Motion granted, without costs. Present— *937Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Putnam.
### **CHAPTER 207—RELEASE AND DETENTION PENDING JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS**

Sec.
3141.
Release and detention authority generally.
3142.
Release or detention of a defendant pending trial.
3143.
Release or detention of a defendant pending sentence or appeal.
3144.
Release or detention of a material witness.
3145.
Review and appeal of a release or detention order.
3146.
Penalty for failure to appear.
3147.
Penalty for an offense committed while on release.
3148.
Sanctions for violation of a release condition.
3149.
Surrender of an offender by a surety.
3150.
Applicability to a case removed from a State court.
[3150a.
Repealed.]
3151.
Refund of forfeited bail.
3152.
Establishment of pretrial services.
3153.
Organization and administration of pretrial services.
3154.
Functions and powers relating to pretrial services.
3155.
Annual reports.
3156.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7084(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4408, added item 3151.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §203(e), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1985, inserted "AND DETENTION PENDING JUDICIAL PROCEEDING" in chapter heading, added new items 3141 to 3150, and struck out former items 3141 to 3151 as follows: item 3141 "Power of courts and magistrates", item 3142 "Surrender by bail", item 3143 "Additional bail", item 3144 "Cases removed from State courts", item 3145 "Parties and witnesses—Rule", item 3146 "Release in noncapital cases prior to trial", item 3147 "Appeal from conditions of release", item 3148 "Release in capital cases or after conviction", item 3149 "Release of material witnesses", item 3150 "Penalties for failure to appear", item 3150a "Refund of forfeited bail", item 3151 "Contempt".

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–267, §6, Sept. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 1138, struck out "agencies" after "services" in item 3152, substituted "and administration of pretrial services" for "of pretrial services agencies" in item 3153, "relating to pretrial services" for "of pretrial services agencies" in item 3154, and "Annual reports" for "Report to Congress" in item 3155.

Pub. L. 97–258, §2(d)(3)(A), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1058, added item 3150a.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–619, title II, §202, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2089, added items 3153 to 3156, and in item 3152, substituted "Establishment of Pretrial Services Agencies" for "Definitions".

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–465, §§3(b), 5(e)(1), June 22, 1966, 80 Stat. 216, 217, substituted "RELEASE" for "BAIL" in chapter heading and "Release in noncapital cases prior to trial" for "Jumping Bail" in item 3146, and added items 3147 to 3152.

**1954**—Act Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 772, §2, 68 Stat. 748, added item 3146.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

May 2002

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-May-02 12 384 396 55 0 0 0 6 598 847 1445 1187 1680 2867

2-May-02 0 252 252 73 0 0 0 6 645 827 1472 1279 1641 2920

3-May-02 18 216 234 90 0 0 0 6 644 827 1471 1278 1640 2918

4-May-02 24 204 228 106 0 0 0 6 539 826 1366 1070 1639 2709

5-May-02 6 300 306 128 0 0 0 5 574 826 1401 1139 1639 2778

6-May-02 9 276 285 148 2 0 2 6 580 826 1406 1151 1638 2789

7-May-02 174 420 594 188 0 0 0 5 591 828 1419 1173 1642 2815

8-May-02 0 672 672 233 18 0 18 6 603 825 1429 1197 1637 2834

9-May-02 52 828 880 295 0 0 0 6 583 826 1409 1156 1638 2794

10-May-02 528 528 1056 366 6 0 6 2 603 826 1429 1197 1638 2835

11-May-02 99 168 267 380 0 0 0 2 596 826 1423 1183 1639 2822

12-May-02 138 348 486 413 0 0 0 2 564 827 1391 1119 1640 2759

13-May-02 204 240 444 443 12 0 12 3 722 827 1550 1433 1641 3074

14-May-02 132 480 612 479 0 0 0 3 648 829 1477 1285 1644 2929

15-May-02 342 264 606 494 0 0 0 3 963 831 1795 1911 1649 3560

16-May-02 1920 636 2556 659 12 0 12 4 1354 831 2185 2686 1648 4334

17-May-02 756 444 1200 728 0 0 0 4 528 830 1358 1048 1646 2694

18-May-02 84 360 444 743 0 0 0 4 320 832 1152 635 1650 2285

19-May-02 612 408 1020 794 0 0 0 4 321 830 1151 637 1646 2283

20-May-02 253 204 457 807 0 0 0 3 324 828 1152 642 1643 2285

21-May-02 102 288 390 792 0 0 0 3 421 829 1250 836 1644 2480

22-May-02 114 672 786 800 0 0 0 2 371 831 1202 736 1649 2385

23-May-02 249 372 621 782 0 0 0 2 324 900 1224 642 1785 2427

24-May-02 1095 408 1503 814 0 0 0 2 329 918 1247 653 1820 2473

25-May-02 20370 372 20742 2276 0 0 0 2 1231 923 2154 2442 1830 4272

26-May-02 1554 336 1890 2377 0 0 0 2 855 924 1779 1695 1833 3528

27-May-02 235 300 535 2383 0 0 0 1 942 920 1862 1869 1825 3694

28-May-02 510 276 786 2395 0 0 0 1 633 924 1557 1255 1833 3088

29-May-02 3465 288 3753 2620 0 0 0 1 688 923 1611 1365 1830 3195

30-May-02 1626 276 1902 2574 0 0 0 0 644 921 1565 1278 1826 3104

31-May-02 954 504 1458 2592 0 0 0 0 644 921 1565 1278 1827 3105

Total 35637 11724 47361 XXXX 50 0 50 XXXX 19387 26509 45896 38455 52580 91035

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
#### George W. Walker, Respondent, v. Anna Dressler, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARQUIS JARVIS RIDDLE, )

DOC# R50737, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4538

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 9, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Marquis Jarvis Riddle, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen,Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1990Employee Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 24, 2003, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2002.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP          
Long Beach, CaliforniaMarch 12, 2003**
### §796. Use of aircraft for photographing defense installations

Whoever uses or permits the use of an aircraft or any contrivance used, or designed for navigation or flight in the air, for the purpose of making a photograph, sketch, picture, drawing, map, or graphical representation of vital military or naval installations or equipment, in violation of section 795 of this title, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 738; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on sections 45, 45a, and 45c of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense (Jan. 12, 1938, ch. 2, §§1, 2, 4, 52 Stat. 3, 4).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Punishment provided by section 795 of this title is repeated, and is from said section 45 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
## NUMBER 13

- 2 0

- 00 574

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SPEEDY CAR WASH, INC ORPORTED

AND CARLOS A. GUERRA, GUARANTOR, Appellant s

,

v.

GERALD SHER, SUSAN SHER,

SPECIALTY CUISINE, INC. D/B/A

ISLE WASH AND ANDREW STAR, TRUSTEE

, A ppellee s

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law N o. 1

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa , and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

This matter is before the Court on appellant s ’ unopposed motion to dismiss

. The

motion informs the court that appellant s no longer desire to appeal the current o rder2 entered by the County Court at Law Number 1 of Cameron County, Texas on December

18 , 2020.

The Court, having considered appellants ’ motion, is of the opinion that the motion

should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Therefore, a ppellants ’ motion to dismiss

is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed

. Costs will be taxed against the appellant s

.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs

against the appellant s .").

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

D elivered and filed on the

8th day of April, 2021.
(No. 6765

#### A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 22, 1973.*

A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.