alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.16


 


ARYX
THERAPEUTICS, INC.


NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR


COMPENSATION
ARRANGEMENTS


 


In July 2007, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ARYx Therapeutics, Inc. (“ARYx”) adopted the following
compensation program for non-employee directors of the Board to be effective
upon the closing of the initial public offering of ARYx’s common stock (the “Offering”). Pursuant to this
program, each member of the Board who is not an employee will receive the
following cash compensation for services rendered as a member of the Board and
committees of the Board, as applicable:


·        
$15,000 per year for service as a
Board member;


·        
$5,000 per year for service as
chairman of the audit committee or compensation committee;


·        
$2,500 per year for service as
chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee;


·        
$2,000 for each Board meeting
attended in person ($1,000 for meetings attended by video or telephone conference);
and


·        
$1,000 for each committee meeting
attended in person ($500 for meetings attended by video or telephone
conference).


ARYx will continue to reimburse its non-employee
directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the
Board and committees of the Board.


Additionally, members of
the Board who are not ARYx’s employees will receive non-statutory stock options
under ARYx’s 2007 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Directors’ Plan”), which will
become effective immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement for
the Offering. Effective upon the closing of this Offering, each non-employee
director will be automatically granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase
16,666 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to the then fair
market value of our common stock. Each non-employee director joining our board
of directors after the closing of the Offering will automatically be granted a
non-statutory stock option to purchase 16,666 shares of common stock with
an exercise price equal to the then fair market value of ARYx’s common stock.
On the date of each annual meeting of ARYx’s stockholders beginning in 2009,
each non-employee director will automatically be granted a non-statutory stock
option to purchase 6,666 shares of ARYx’s common stock on that date with an
exercise price equal to the then fair market value of the common stock. The
initial grant will vest monthly over three years from the date of grant and the
annual grant will vest monthly over one year from the date of grant. All stock
options granted under the 2007 Directors’ Plan will have a term of ten years.
§ 303.15 Free appropriate public education. Free appropriate public education or FAPE, as used in §§ 303.211, 303.501, and 303.521, means special education and related services that— ( a ) Are provided at public expense, under public supervision and direction, and without charge;
( b ) Meet the standards of the State educational agency (SEA), including the requirements of part B of the Act;
( c ) Include an appropriate preschool, elementary school, or secondary school education in the State involved; and
( d ) Are provided in conformity with an individualized education program (IEP) that meets the requirements of 34 CFR 300.320 through 300.324.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(9))
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 

In the Matter of: In Bankruptcy:

ATLANTIC LIST COMPANY, INC.

Case No. 19-13574-BFK

Chapter 7

Debtor Hon. Brian F. Kenney

 /

NOTICE OF UNCLAIMED DIVIDENDS

TO: THE CLERK OF THE COURT

The attached check in the amount of $23,244.68 represents the total sum of 

unclaimed dividends in this estate and is paid to the Court pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §347. 

The name(s) and address(es) of the Party(ies) entitled to these unclaimed dividends is 

(are) as follows:

CREDITOR NAME

JASON BERRY

13155 NOEL RD STE. 1750

DALLAS, TX 75024

TOTAL $23,244.68

CLAIM NO. 

22 

AMOUNT OF 

DIVIDEND

$23,244.68

Dated: January 26, 2023

/s/ Donald F. King, Trustee

1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400

Reston, VA 20190

(703) 218-2100

donking@ofplaw.com

Case 19-13574-BFK Doc 66 Filed 02/10/23 Entered 02/10/23 16:15:59 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin Fein, Appellant.

First Department,

May 29, 1914.

Crime — assault, second degree —blow not shown to have caused bodily harm. •

A defendant cannot be convicted of assault in the second degree, under subdivision 3 of section 343 of the Penal Law, where the proof is that, having no weapon, he merely struck the complainant without wounding him, or causing blood to flow, or breaking the skin, or causing any injury, or that severe pain was inflicted, etc. Proof that the defendant wounded or inflicted grievous bodily harm upon another was necessary to a conviction.

*It*seems, however, that the defendant might have been convicted of assault in the third degree.

Appeal by the defendant, Benjamin Fein, from a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace of the county of New York, rendered against him on the 23d day of January, 1914, convicting him of the crime of assault in the second degree.

*Charles G. F. Wahle,*for the appellant.

*Robert C. Taylor,*for the respondent.

Dowling, J.:

We are satisfied upon this record that the complaining witness, Sergeant Sheridan, was assaulted by the defendant in the manner described by the complainant; but the only testimony which indicates the nature of the assault made upon him is that the defendant struck Sheridan in the ear. Concededly, there was no weapon in the defendant’s hand at the time. There is an absence of any proof that the complainant was wounded in anyway; or that blood was caused to flow; or that the skin was broken; or that any injury whatever was caused to him thereby; or that severe pain was inflicted; or even that the blow itself was a severe.one. The defendant has been convicted of assault in the second degree under subdivision 3 of section 242 of the Penal Law, which renders hable for assault in the second degree one who “wilfully and wrongfully wounds *766or inflicts grievous bodily harm upon another, either with or without a weapon.” While the defendant was proven guilty of an assault, the testimony fails to disclose the presence of the necessary element of wounding pr inflicting grievous bodily harm. It was, therefore, an assault in the third degree only (Penal Law, § 244), and the defendant’s conviction of the higher grade of crime cannot be sustained. Against the conclusion thus reached the district attorney has found himself unable to present any argument.

The judgment of conviction will, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered. Order to be settled on notice.
§ 690.62 Calculation of a Federal Pell Grant. ( a ) The amount of a student's Pell Grant for an academic year is based upon the payment and disbursement schedules published by the Secretary for each award year.
( b ) ( 1 ) ( i ) For a confined or incarcerated individual enrolled in an eligible prison education program, no Federal Pell Grant may exceed the cost of attendance (as defined in section 472 of the HEA) at the institution that student attends.
( ii ) If an institution determines that the amount of a Federal Pell Grant for that student exceeds the cost of attendance for that year, the amount of the Federal Pell Grant must be reduced until the Federal Pell Grant does not exceed the cost of attendance at such institution and does not result in a title IV credit balance under 34 CFR 668.164(h).
( 2 ) ( i ) If a confined or incarcerated individual's Pell Grant, combined with any other financial assistance, exceeds the student's cost of attendance, the financial assistance other than the Pell Grant must be reduced by the amount that the total financial assistance exceeds the student's cost of attendance.
( ii ) If the confined or incarcerated individual's other financial assistance cannot be reduced, the student's Pell Grant must be reduced by the amount that the student's total financial assistance exceeds the student's cost of attendance.
[87 FR 65498, Oct. 28, 2022]
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, William Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Adsero Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: August 24, 2005          /s/ William Smith
                                        ------------------
                                        William Smith
                                        Principal Accounting and
                                        Financial Officer
### Hawaiian volcanoes during 1955

By: G. A. MacdonaldJ. P. Eaton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1171

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §3604. Transportation of a probationer

A court, after imposing a sentence of probation, may direct a United States marshal to furnish the probationer with—

(a) transportation to the place to which he is required to proceed as a condition of his probation; and

(b) money, not to exceed such amount as the Attorney General may prescribe, for subsistence expenses while traveling to his destination.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2002.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
(No. 77-CC-1749

#### Terrence Moore, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed October 27, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling u. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was *260damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5223 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5223

To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness 
       Act of 1992 to adjust the affordable housing allocations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2019

 Mrs. Beatty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness 
       Act of 1992 to adjust the affordable housing allocations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Generating Resources and 
Opportunities Within Affordable Housing Act'' or the ``GROW Affordable 
Housing Act''.

SEC. 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLOCATIONS.

    Section 1337(a) of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety 
and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4567(a)) is amended by striking 
``4.2 basis points'' each place such term appears and inserting ``10 
basis points''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 692.70 How does the Secretary allot funds to the States?

For fiscal year 2010-2011, the Secretary allots to each eligible State that applies for SLEAP funds an amount in accordance with the provisions in § 692.10 prior to calculating allotments for States applying for GAP funds under subpart C of this part.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-3a)

[74 FR 55952, Oct. 29, 2009]
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

October 2015

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 806 994 373 1,598 1,971 0.0 0.0

2-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 806 990 364 1,599 1,963 0.0 0.0

3-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 806 989 364 1,598 1,962 0.0 0.0

4-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 811 1,132 637 1,608 2,245 0.0 0.0

5-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 806 989 364 1,598 1,962 0.0 0.0

6-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 805 1,080 546 1,596 2,142 0.0 0.0

7-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 804 987 364 1,594 1,958 0.0 0.0

8-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 805 1,080 546 1,596 2,142 0.0 0.0

9-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 322 803 1,125 639 1,592 2,231 0.0 0.0

10-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 376 804 1,180 746 1,595 2,341 0.0 0.0

11-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 505 1,603 2,108 1,001 3,180 4,181 0.0 0.0

12-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 596 1,607 2,203 1,183 3,187 4,370 0.0 0.0

13-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1,609 1,655 91 3,192 3,283 0.0 0.0

14-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1,612 1,658 91 3,198 3,289 0.0 0.0

15-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 1,614 1,844 455 3,202 3,657 0.0 0.0

16-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 1,616 1,847 457 3,206 3,663 0.0 0.0

17-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 1,619 1,806 371 3,212 3,583 0.0 0.0

18-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 1,046 1,321 546 2,074 2,620 0.0 0.0

19-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 805 942 273 1,596 1,869 0.0 0.0

20-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 831 1,060 455 1,648 2,103 0.0 0.0

21-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 867 1,005 273 1,720 1,993 0.0 0.0

22-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 316 911 1,227 627 1,807 2,434 0.0 0.0

23-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 955 1,231 546 1,895 2,441 0.0 0.0

24-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 956 1,002 91 1,896 1,987 0.0 0.0

25-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 956 1,278 637 1,897 2,534 0.0 0.0

26-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 953 1,229 546 1,891 2,437 0.0 0.0

27-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 955 1,277 637 1,895 2,532 0.0 0.0

28-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 955 1,138 364 1,894 2,258 0.0 0.0

29-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 957 1,186 455 1,898 2,353 0.0 0.0

30-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 953 1,183 455 1,891 2,346 0.0 0.0

31-Oct-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 952 1,273 637 1,888 2,525 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 7,630 32,388 40,018 15,134 64,241 79,375 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP CVP
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135295 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan CARLTON GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135295 COA: 277331 WCAC: 06-000038 NUCRAFT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., CONNECTICUT INDEMNITY COMPANY, and MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 9, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
| | EXHIBIT 32.2 | 
| | ------------ | 

|
|

| | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

|In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICrystal, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Loflin, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|
|

|Dated: August 23, 2004. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN | 
|----------------------- | ---------------- | 

| | David Loflin | 
| | ------------ | 

| | Acting Chief Financial Officer | 
| | ------------------------------ |
§ 75.118 Requirements for a continuation award. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70321 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) A recipient that wants to receive a continuation award shall submit a performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information, as directed by the Secretary, that is sufficient to meet the reporting requirements of 2 CFR 200.327 and 200.328 and 34 CFR 75.590 and 75.720.
( b ) If a recipient fails to submit a performance report that meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary denies continued funding for the grant. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1875-0102) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 3474)


Cross Reference:
See 2 CFR 200.327, Financial reporting, and 200.328, Monitoring and reporting program performance; and 34 CFR 75.117, Information needed for a multi-year project, 75.250 through 75.253, Approval of multi-year projects, 75.590, Evaluation by the grantee, and 75.720, Financial and performance reports. [59 FR 30261, June 10, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 50391, Sept. 16, 1999; 79 FR 76091, Dec. 19, 2014]