alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1348. Securities and commodities fraud

Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—

(1) to defraud any person in connection with any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)); or

(2) to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any money or property in connection with the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d));

shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 25 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title VIII, §807(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 804; amended Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1), May 20, 2009, 123 Stat. 1618.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(A), inserted "and commodities" before "fraud" in section catchline.

Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 111–21, §2(e)(1)(B), (C), inserted "any commodity for future delivery, or any option on a commodity for future delivery, or" before "any security".
### [§§4283, 4284. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §218(a)(7), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027]

Section 4283, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 856, related to furnishing transportation when placing a defendant on probation.

Section 4284, added May 15, 1952, ch. 289, §1, 66 Stat. 72; amended Sept. 13, 1982, Pub. L. 97–258, §3(e)(5), 96 Stat. 1064, related to advances for rehabilitation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such repeal, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
No. 16,039.

#### Harmon *v.*Leonard.

(193 P. [2d] 716)

Decided May 10, 1948.

Mr. Charles Oscar Erbaugh, Mr. John R. Wolff, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George J. Robinson, Mr. George O. Priest, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L. Rosenfield, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 19, 2010



By:

/s/    RICHARD L.
ROSENFIELDRichard L. Rosenfield Co-Chief Executive Officer








|* | This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-53461, S-8 No. 333-32994, and S-8 No. 333-55044) of McLaren
Performance Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report
dated November 28, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) for the year ended September 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

December 30, 2002
Detroit, Michigan
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5284 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize State approving agencies 

to carry out outreach activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Mr. KIM, Mr. WALTZ, and Mr. COOK) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize State 

approving agencies to carry out outreach activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Outreach Un5 derstanding To Reach Every American Courageous Hero 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘Vet OUTREACH Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 The Congress finds the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5284 IH

1 (1) State Approving Agencies (SAAs) play a 

2 critical role administering GI Bill benefits to vet3 erans. 

4 (2) SAAs ensure veterans can use their GI Bill 

5 benefits at quality education and job-training pro6 grams like apprenticeships. 

7 (3) The SAAs primary purpose is to review, 

8 evaluate, and approve education and training pro9 grams to ensure veterans have the highest quality 

10 education. 

11 (4) The VALOR Act (Public Law 115–89), 

12 makes it easier for employers to offer apprentice13 ships to veterans. 

14 (5) In 2015, SAAs across the country con15 ducted almost 50,000 outreached-related actions to 

16 ensure veterans were informed of the benefits they 

17 are entitled to receive. 

18 (6) SAAs are now left to rely on outreach prod19 ucts created before 2015 and can no longer travel to 

20 job fairs and employers to ensure veterans, edu21 cational institutions, and employers know about the 

22 potential benefits and opportunities of the GI Bill. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5284 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY OF STATE APPROVING AGENCIES TO 

2 CARRY OUT OUTREACH ACTIVITIES. 

3 Section 3673 of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(f) OUTREACH ACTIVITIES.— 

7 ‘‘(1) A State approving agency may carry out 

8 outreach activities if it has properly conducted its 

9 enforcement and approval of education programs 

10 and funds are still available to do so. 

11 ‘‘(2) A SAA shall be considered to have prop12 erly conducted its enforcement and approval of edu13 cation programs if it has met its Department of Vet14 erans Affairs cooperative agreement requirements 

15 relating to the oversight and approval of programs, 

16 and has completed a risk-based program review of 

17 any program determined to be of questionable qual18 ity or at risk by any Federal or State agency or any 

19 accrediting agency. 

20 ‘‘(3) Outreach activities carried out under this 

21 subsection shall be carried out using amounts other22 wise authorized to be appropriated. No additional 

23 amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 

24 out this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 76.132 What assurances must be in a consolidated grant application? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70336 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) An Insular Area shall include in its consolidated grant application assurances to the Secretary that it will: ( 1 ) Follow policies and use administrative practices that will insure that non-Federal funds will not be supplanted by Federal funds made available under the authority of the programs in the consolidated grant;
( 2 ) Comply with the requirements (except those relating to the submission of State plans or similar documents) in the authorizing statutes and implementing regulations for the programs under which funds are to be used and administered, (except requirements for matching funds);
( 3 ) Provide for proper and efficient administration of funds in accordance with the authorizing statutes and implementing regulations for those programs under which funds are to be used and administered;
( 4 ) Provide for fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to assure proper disbursement of, and accounting for, Federal funds received under the consolidated grant;
( 5 ) Submit an annual report to the Secretary containing information covering the program or programs for which the grant is used and administered, including the financial and program performance information required under 2 CFR 200.327 and 200.328.
( 6 ) Provide that funds received under the consolidated grant will be under control of, and that title to property acquired with these funds will be in, a public agency, institution, or organization. The public agency shall administer these funds and property;
( 7 ) Keep records, including a copy of the State Plan or application document under which funds are to be spent, which show how the funds received under the consolidated grant have been spent.
( 8 ) Adopt and use methods of monitoring and providing technical assistance to any agencies, organizations, or institutions that carry out the programs under the consolidated grant and enforce any obligations imposed on them under the applicable statutes and regulations.
( 9 ) Evaluate the effectiveness of these programs in meeting the purposes and objectives in the authorizing statutes under which program funds are used and administered;
( 10 ) Conduct evaluations of these programs at intervals and in accordance with procedures the Secretary may prescribe; and
( 11 ) Provide appropriate opportunities for participation by local agencies, representatives of the groups affected by the programs, and other interested institutions, organizations, and individuals in planning and operating the programs.
( b ) These assurances remain in effect for the duration of the programs they cover.
(Authority: 48 U.S.C. 1469a)
[47 FR 17421, Apr. 22, 1982, as amended at 64 FR 50392, Sept. 16, 1999; 79 FR 76093, Dec. 19, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6883

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

LINWOOD BRUCE CAMERON, II, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00372-JAB-1) 

Submitted: October 16, 2009 Decided: November 4, 2009 

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Linwood Bruce Cameron, II, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Linwood Bruce Cameron, II, appeals the district 

court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Cameron, No. 1:01-cr-00372-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 642

 525

 519

 382

 368

 285

 513

 482

 377

 447

 443

 443

 526

 573

 566

 544

 556

 501

 558

 676

 961

 972

 1,151

 1,279

 1,312

 1,357

 1,643

 2,531

 2,507

 1,961

 1,160

 201

 205

 195

 177

 166

 159

 165

 169

 171

 171

 170

 175

 171

 178

 184

 188

 187

 182

 181

 177

 183

 195

 200

 188

 212

 234

 240

 255

 279

 252

 249

 272

 264

 267

 236

 200

 192

 209

 219

 207

 230

 230

 243

 268

 269

 278

 280

 289

 267

 250

 244

 260

 276

 339

 336

 367

 446

 524

 658

 720

 552

 450

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,318

 3,326

 3,336

 3,334

 3,323

 3,325

 3,340

 3,353

 3,348

 3,357

 3,361

 3,342

 3,334

 3,306

 3,312

 3,328

 3,350

 3,381

 3,431

 3,483

 3,534

 3,591

 3,723

 3,829

 3,966

 4,169

 4,425

 4,814

 5,256

 5,528

 5,689

 237

 238

 238

 238

 237

 238

 239

 240

 239

 240

 240

 239

 238

 236

 237

 238

 239

 242

 245

 249

 252

 257

 266

 274

 283

 298

 316

 344

 375

 395

 406

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         |   |                                                                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 31, 2010     | By:    | /s/ Joseph M. Jayson                                                                   |   |
|                                         |   | Joseph M. Jayson                                                                       |   |
|                                         |   | Individual General Partner ,Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer |   |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 678

 597

 634

 604

 496

 475

 398

 456

 411

 429

 427

 437

 438

 389

 381

 365

 325

 317

 363

 599

 632

 609

 624

 638

 661

 682

 654

 682

 685

 683

 681

 219

 211

 209

 217

 212

 215

 226

 249

 272

 281

 299

 310

 306

 300

 305

 250

 223

 239

 252

 251

 358

 357

 362

 341

 350

 354

 345

 358

 364

 362

 368

 405

 345

 387

 372

 324

 289

 290

 367

 343

 359

 357

 358

 346

 331

 330

 300

 276

 278

 313

 351

 499

 448

 471

 454

 472

 460

 455

 473

 483

 481

 485

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 266

 229

 255

 246

 216

 195

 195

 243

 228

 238

 237

 237

 230

 221

 220

 201

 187

 188

 209

 233

 324

 293

 307

 297

 308

 300

 297

 308

 314

 313

 316

TOTAL 11,902

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Exhibit 23

                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP







           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As  independent  public  accountants, we hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K  into  IES
Industries  Inc.'s  (the  "Company") previously  filed  Form  S-8
Registration  Statement  (File No. 33-57088)  for  the  Company's
Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan, Form S-8  Registration  Statement
(File  No. 33-32468) for the Company's Employee Savings Plan  and
Form  S-3  Registration  Statement (File No.  33-56981)  for  the
Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.



                                      /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 7, 1996
Editorial Note on Part 674
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 674 appear at 65 FR 18002, 18003, Apr. 6, 2000.

§ 674.40 Treatment of loan repayments where cancellation, loan repayments, and minimum monthly repayments apply. ( a ) An institution may not exercise the minimum monthly repayment provisions on a note when the borrower has received a partial cancellation for the period covered by a postponement.
( b ) If a borrower has received Defense, NDSL, and Perkins loans and only one can be cancelled, the amount due on the uncancelled loan is the amount established in § 674.31(b) (2), loan repayment terms; § 674.33(b), minimum repayment rates; or § 674.33(c), extension of repayment period.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 425 and 1087dd, 1087ee)
[52 FR 45754, Dec. 1, 1987. Redesignated at 59 FR 61410, Nov. 30, 1994]
### Part 2—Relief From Market Disruption to Industries and Diversion of Trade to the United States Market
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  May 19, 2006

/s/ D. Elroy  Fimrite

D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) and will be retained by SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 248

 242

 223

 226

 250

 237

 268

 246

 240

 245

 241

 261

 240

 239

 258

 237

 239

 243

 255

 235

 228

 234

 237

 239

 240

 233

 264

 242

 212

 211

 214

 215

 209

 222

 222

 226

 215

 227

 233

 233

 231

 228

 229

 226

 222

 223

 220

 212

 205

 211

 218

 217

 218

 221

 224

 224

 219

 217

 218

 219

 226

 225

 232

 232

 229

 233

 236

 239

 235

 232

 236

 230

 228

 229

 233

 225

 216

 221

 227

 224

 226

 226

 232

 232

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,063

 3,062

 3,069

 3,076

 3,089

 3,095

 3,106

 3,113

 3,106

 3,113

 3,131

 3,156

 3,178

 3,192

 3,209

 3,222

 3,232

 3,242

 3,249

 3,249

 3,233

 3,222

 3,220

 3,211

 3,201

 3,188

 3,185

 3,185

 219

 219

 219

 220

 221

 221

 222

 222

 222

 222

 224

 225

 227

 228

 229

 230

 231

 232

 232

 232

 231

 230

 230

 229

 229

 228

 228

 228

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 76.674 Hearing procedures. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The following procedures apply to a show cause hearing regarding implementation of a bypass: ( 1 ) The hearing officer arranges for a transcript to be taken.
( 2 ) The grantee, subgrantee, and representatives of the private school children each may— ( i ) Be represented by legal counsel; and
( ii ) Submit oral or written evidence and arguments at the hearing.
( b ) Within 10 days after the hearing, the hearing officer— ( 1 ) Indicates that a decision will be issued on the basis of the existing record; or
( 2 ) Requests further information from the grantee, subgrantee, representatives of the private school children, or Department officials.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 2727(b)(4)(A), 2972(h)(1), 2990(c), 3223(c))
[54 FR 21776, May 19, 1989]
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Kenneth D. Lehrer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kenneth E. Lehrer
---------------------------
    Kenneth E. Lehrer
    Chief Financial Officer


Date  December 14, 2005
      -----------------

<PAGE>
(No. 6942

#### Keenan Printing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Fair Employment Practices Commission, Respondent.

*137
      *Opinion filed November 14, 1972.*

Keenan Printing Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.