SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

17 CFR Parts 230 and 240 

[Release Nos. 33-9108; 34-61560; IC-29131; File No. S7-22-09] 

RIN 3235-AK25 

AMENDMENTS TO RULES REQUIRING INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF 

PROXY MATERIALS 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are amending rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 

Securities Act of 1933 to clarify and provide additional flexibility regarding the format of 

the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that is sent to shareholders and to 

permit issuers and other soliciting persons to better communicate with shareholders by 

including explanatory materials regarding the reasons for the use of the notice and access 

proxy rules and the process of receiving and reviewing proxy materials and voting 

pursuant to the notice and access proxy rules. The amendments also revise the timeframe 

for delivering a Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than the issuer 

relies on the notice and access proxy rules and permit mutual funds to accompany the 

Notice with a summary prospectus. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven G. Hearne, Special Counsel 

in the Office of Rulemaking, Division of Corporation Finance, at (202) 551-3430, or with 

respect to registered investment companies, Sanjay Lamba, Senior Counsel, in the Office 

of Disclosure Regulation, Division of Investment Management, at (202) 551-6784, 100 F 

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is amending Rule 14a-161 

under the Securities Exchange Act of 19342 and Rule 4983 under the Securities Act of 

1933.4 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

I. Background and Overview of the Amendments 

II. Discussion of the Amendments 

A. Revisions to the Notice Requirements and Inclusion of 

Explanatory Materials 

1. Proposed Amendments 

2. Comments on the Proposed Amendments 

3. Final Rule 

B.	 Amendment to Notice Deadlines for Soliciting Persons 

Other Than the Issuer 

1. Proposed Amendment 

2. Comments on the Proposed Amendment 

3. Final Rule 

C. Additional Comments on the Proposed Amendments and 

Actions Taken by the Commission 

D. Technical Amendments Relating to Registered Investment 

Companies 

1 17 CFR 240.14a-16. 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. 

3 17 CFR 230.498. 

4 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. 

2
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. Paperwork Reduction Act 

IV. Cost-Benefit Analysis 

V. Consideration of Burden on Competition and Promotion of 

Efficiency, Competition and Capital Formation 

VI. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

VII. Statutory Authority and Text of the Amendments 

I. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF THE AMENDMENTS 

On October 14, 2009, we proposed amendments to the notice and access proxy 

rules to remove regulatory impediments that may be reducing shareholder response rates 

to proxy solicitations by permitting issuers and other soliciting persons to more 

effectively use the notice and access model.5

 These amendments were proposed based on 

our continuing review of the disclosures shareholders receive when they are asked to 

make a voting decision and the process followed when those votes are solicited.6 As 

discussed in detail below, we are adopting the proposed amendments with certain 

modifications based on the comments received on the proposal. 

5	 Amendments to Rules Requiring Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Release No. 33-9073 

(Oct. 14, 2009) [74 FR 53954] (the “Proposing Release”). 

6	 See, e.g., Facilitating Shareholder Director Nominations, Release No. 33-9046 (June 10, 2009) [74 

FR 29024], Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, Release No. 33-9089 (Dec. 16, 2009) [74 FR 

68443], and Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as modified by Amendment No. 4, to 

Amend NYSE Rule 452 and Corresponding Listed Company Manual Section 402.08 to Eliminate 

Broker Discretionary Voting for the Election of Directors, Except for Companies Registered under 

the Investment Company Act of 1940, and to Codify Two Previously Published Interpretations 

that Do Not Permit Broker Discretionary Voting for Material Amendments to Investment 

Advisory Contracts with an Investment Company, Release No. 34-60215 (July 1, 2009) [74 FR 

33293]. 

3
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

We received 25 comment letters in response to the proposed amendments.7 These 

letters came from corporations, professional associations, institutional investors, law 

firms, transfer agents, proxy service providers and other interested parties. We have 

reviewed and considered all of the comments that we received on the proposed 

amendments. Most commenters supported the use of the notice and access model and the 

Commission’s proposed modifications to improve its implementation.8 The adopted 

rules reflect changes made in response to some of these comments. We explain our 

revisions with respect to each proposed rule amendment in more detail throughout this 

release. 

In 2007, the Commission established procedures that promote the use of the 

Internet as a reliable and cost-efficient means of making proxy materials available to 

shareholders.9

 The notice and access proxy rules require all issuers and other soliciting 

persons to post their proxy materials on an Internet Web site and provide a Notice of 

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) to shareholders. These rules also 

provide issuers and other soliciting persons an option as to whether to send a full set of 

7	 See letters from American Bar Association (“ABA”), American Business Conference (“ABC”), 

Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise”), Association of Corporate Counsel (“ACC”), The 

Altman Group (“Altman”), BNY Mellon Shareowner Services (“BNY”), Broadridge Financial 

Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), Independent Steering Committee of Broadridge Investor 

Communications Solutions (“Broadridge Steering Committee”), California State Teachers 

Retirement System (“CalSTRS”), Calvert Group Limited (“Calvert”), U.S. Chamber of Commerce 

(“Chamber”), Computershare Limited (“Computershare”), Corporate Governance, Diversified 

Global Graphics Group (“DG3”), Edison International (“Edison”), Investment Company Institute 

(“ICI”), Intel Corporation (“Intel”), IR WebReport.com, Moxy Vote (“Moxy”), National Investor 

Relations Institute (“NIRI”), Otter Tail Corporation (“Otter Tail”), Registrar and Transfer 

Company (“R&T”), Sullivan & Cromwell (“S&C”), Society of Corporate Secretaries and 

Governance Professionals (“SCSGP”), and Securities Transfer Association, Inc. (“STA”). 

8	 See, e.g., letters from ABA, ABC, ACC, Altman, BNY, Broadridge, Broadridge Steering 

Committee, CalSTRS, Calvert, Chamber, Computershare, Edison, ICI, Intel, NIRI, Otter Tail, 

R&T, S&C, SCSGP, and STA. 

9	 See Internet Availability of Proxy Material, Release No. 34-55146 (Jan. 22, 2007) [72 FR 4148] 

(“Internet Availability of Proxy Material Adopting Release”) and Shareholder Choice Regarding 

Proxy Materials, Release No. 34-56135 (July 26, 2007) [72 FR 42221]. 

4
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

proxy materials to all shareholders or to send shareholders only the Notice. According to 

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), over 1,300 corporate issuers used 

the notice-only option for distribution of the Notice to some portion of their beneficial 

owners under the notice and access model in the 2009 proxy season.10 Commenters, 

including Broadridge and transfer agents who conduct the distribution to registered 

owners, indicated that issuers have experienced significant cost savings in printing, 

postage and processing fees.11 

As we noted in the Proposing Release, while many issuers have experienced 

significant cost savings using the notice-only option, statistics indicate lower shareholder 

response rates to proxy solicitations when the notice-only option is used.12 We are 

concerned that some investors may be confused when issuers and other soliciting persons 

distribute proxy materials using the notice-only option and we believe our rules should be 

amended to provide additional flexibility for issuers and other soliciting persons to better 

communicate with shareholders to reduce that confusion. 

We are adopting amendments today to provide issuers and other soliciting persons 

with additional flexibility to provide to shareholders a more effective explanation of the 

10	 See Broadridge Notice & Access, Statistical Overview of Use with Beneficial Shareholders (as of 

June 30, 2009) attached to the letter from Broadridge (“Broadridge Statistical Overview”). 

Broadridge is the largest provider of brokerage processing services with respect to beneficial 

owners holding through a broker or similar intermediary and has provided detailed statistical 

information on the use of the notice and access model. The Broadridge Statistical Overview is 

generally limited to comparisons between issuers that have used the notice-only option for 

distribution to some portion of their beneficial owners and issuers that exclusively used the full set 

delivery option and comparisons between the first and second years of use of the notice-only 

option. The data does not provide a comparison to an issuer’s experience in the year prior to using 

the notice-only option for distribution. 

11	 See, e.g., letters from Broadridge, BNY, and R&T. Some commenters noted that processing fees 

were reduced on distributions to registered owners, but expressed concern about the processing 

fees charged by service providers for distributions to beneficial owners. See, e.g., letters from 

Altman, BNY, ICI, NIRI, Otter Tail, R&T, and STA. 

12	 See notes 18 – 20 of the Proposing Release. 

5
 
 

importance and effect of the Notice and the reasons for its use, which should better 

facilitate use of our rules and improve investor understanding. Specifically, the 

amendments provide additional flexibility regarding the format and content of the Notice, 

permit issuers and other soliciting persons to better communicate with shareholders by 

including explanatory materials regarding the reasons for the use of the notice and access 

rules and the process of receiving and reviewing proxy materials and voting, and revise 

the timeframe for delivering a Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than 

the issuer relies on the notice-only option. 

II. DISCUSSION OF THE AMENDMENTS 

A. Revisions to the Notice Requirements and Inclusion of Explanatory 

Materials 

We proposed amendments to Exchange Act Rule 14a-16 to provide issuers and 

other soliciting persons with additional flexibility to develop a more effective Notice and 

to provide shareholders with guidance as to how to access the proxy materials online, 

request a paper copy of the proxy materials, and vote their shares. We are adopting the 

amendments generally as proposed with some changes as recommended by commenters. 

1. Proposed Amendments 

Under the amendments we proposed, issuers and other soliciting persons would 

have additional flexibility in formatting and selecting the language to be used in the 

Notice. Rather than requiring the soliciting person to include a detailed legend that may 

seem like boilerplate language to shareholders, we proposed to require that the 

information appearing on the Notice address certain topics, without specifying the exact 

6
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

language to be used.13 Further, in order to mitigate confusion about the Notice and to 

allow issuers and other soliciting persons to better engage shareholders, we proposed to 

revise Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f)(2)14 to permit issuers and other soliciting persons to 

accompany the Notice with an explanation of the notice and access model, which would 

be limited to an explanation of the process of receiving and reviewing the proxy materials 

and voting. Materials designed to persuade shareholders to vote in a particular manner, 

change the method of delivery of proxy materials, or explain why the person was sending 

only a Notice to shareholders would not be permitted under the proposed amendments. 

2. Comments on the Proposed Amendments 

Most commenters supported the additional flexibility provided by the proposed 

amendments to design and prepare the Notice and provide explanatory materials, and 

many of these commenters offered additional suggestions for improving the proposals.15 

Several commenters recommended that the design and wording of the Notice should be 

required to clearly indicate that the Notice is not a proxy card and may not be voted.16 

Other commenters supported a uniform and easily recognizable design for the Notice,17 

13	 As proposed, Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(d) would limit the required legend to the line “Important 

Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting To Be Held on 

[insert meeting date]” and would require the other information currently required in the legend to 

be included in the Notice, but not as part of a specified legend. 

14	 17 CFR 240.14a-16(f)(2). 

15	 See, e.g., letters from ABA, ACC, BNY, Broadridge, Broadridge Steering Committee, Calvert, 

Chamber, Computershare, Edison, ICI, Intel, Otter Tail, R&T, S&C, SCSGP, and STA. 

16	 See, e.g., letters from ABA, Altman, Otter Tail, and Intel. Letters from ABA, Altman and Intel 

suggested the inclusion of a mandatory legend indicating that a separate proxy card should be used 

for voting. 

17	 See letter from Otter Tail. 

7
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

requiring intermediaries to forward the Notice in issuer provided envelopes,18 or 

requiring that the Notice identify proxy items by topic rather than specific proposals.19 

Several commenters supported more flexibility than we had proposed for the 

explanatory materials, such as permitting an issuer to explain the reasons for its use of the 

notice-only option.20 Commenters suggested that an issuer’s rationale for using the 

notice-only option would enhance shareholders’ understanding of the reasons for 

receiving the Notice, inform investors of the benefits of using the notice-only option and 

help to distinguish the Notice from the proxy card, without influencing a shareholder’s 

voting decision.21 One commenter supported additionally requiring that intermediaries 

be required to pass explanatory materials on to beneficial owners.22 

Finally, one commenter noted that if the Commission approved the proposed 

amendments to the Notice requirements, a technical change is necessary to Exchange Act 

Rule 14a-16(n).23 Rule 14a-16(n) addresses the notice and access requirements when an 

issuer or other soliciting person sends a full set of proxy materials to security holders. 

The suggested technical change related to references in Rule 14a-16(n)(4) to the 

disclosure requirements of the Notice in Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(d). Since the 

proposed amendments revise the disclosure requirements of Rule 14a-16(d), conforming 

changes should also be made to 14a-16(n)(4). 

18 See letter from Edison. 

19 See letter from Intel suggesting that the mandated format of the Notice be changed so that matters 

to be addressed at the annual meeting be identified by topic rather than identifying the specific 

proposals in order to avoid confusion between the Notice and the proxy card. 

20 See, e.g., letters from ABA, ACC, S&C, and STA. 

21 See, e.g., letters from ABA and ACC. 

22 See letter from ABA. 

23 See letter from S&C. 

8
 
 

 

 

 

 

 3. Final Rule 

After considering the comments, we are adopting the amendments to our 

requirements regarding the Notice and the rules about what materials may accompany the 

initial distribution of the Notice as proposed with some changes as recommended by 

commenters. The final rule provides issuers and other soliciting persons with additional 

flexibility in formatting and selecting the language to be used in the Notice, as proposed. 

The information appearing on the Notice is required to address certain topics, without 

specifying the exact language to be used. In response to comments requesting that the 

rules specifically state that the Notice is not a form of proxy and may not be voted, we 

are adopting final rules that require an issuer or other soliciting person to indicate that the 

Notice is not a form for voting. We are not, however, adopting suggested changes to the 

Notice requirements that would require a prescribed legend that the Notice is not a proxy 

card. We are also not adopting changes to the Notice that would require a uniform design 

for the Notice or would require that the Notice identify proxy items by topic rather than 

specific identification. We believe that the requirement that the Notice indicate that it is 

not a form for voting and the additional flexibility provided by the revised rules, as well 

as the guidance regarding the requirements of redesignated Exchange Act Rule 14a16(d)(6),24 address the concerns raised by commenters. These changes also provide 

issuers and other soliciting persons the flexibility to draft the Notice more effectively. 

We believe that the flexibility should discourage the development of boilerplate 

disclosure, which is one of the problems our amendments are designed to address. 

We are redesignating 17 CFR 240.14a-16(d)(2) through 17 CFR 240.14a-16(d)(8) as 17 CFR 

240.14a-16(d)(5) through 17 CFR 240.14a-16(d)(11). Prior to this redesignation, the referenced 

paragraph was 17 CFR 240.14a-16(d)(3) as indicated in the Proposing Release. After adoption, as 

noted here, the referenced paragraph is 17 CFR 240.14a-16(d)(6). 

9

24 
 

 

 

 

 

As noted above, several commenters supported additional flexibility to allow the 

materials to address the reasons for the use of the notice-only option.25 Consistent with 

the proposal, the final rule permits issuers and other soliciting persons to accompany the 

Notice with an explanation of the notice and access model.26 As proposed, new 

Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f)(2)(iv)27 allows issuers and other soliciting persons to 

provide an explanation of the process of receiving and reviewing the proxy materials and 

voting under the notice and access proxy rules. In a change from the proposal, new 

Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f)(2)(iv) also permits an explanation of the reasons for the use 

of the notice and access rules, as some commenters suggested. 

We concur that additional flexibility to explain the reasons for the use of the 

notice and access rules and the notice-only option may enhance shareholders’ 

understanding of the notice and access model and, therefore, we have expanded the 

exception to include those topics. Materials designed to persuade shareholders to vote in 

a particular manner or change the method of the delivery of proxy materials are still not 

permitted under the revised exception.28 As also noted above, one commenter suggested 

that we specifically require that intermediaries and their agents be required to distribute 

explanatory materials prepared in reliance on the amended rules. Since issuers and other 

soliciting persons are generally required to reimburse intermediaries for the reasonable 

25	 See note 20 above. 

26	 We emphasize that under revised Rule 14a-16(f)(2) only registrants and other soliciting persons, 

and not other parties, may accompany a Notice with explanatory materials. 

27	 This new provision is an additional exception to the general rule in Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f) 

that the Notice be sent separately from other types of security holder communications. 

28	 While the Notice continues to permit the soliciting person to include their recommendations as 

provided in redesignated Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(d)(6), as we explained in the Internet 

Availability of Proxy Material Adopting Release, “The Notice is intended merely to make 

shareholders aware that these proxy materials are available on an Internet Web site; it is not 

intended to serve as a stand-alone basis for making a voting decision.” 

10
 
 

 

 

 

expenses incurred in connection with forwarding materials to shareholders, we are not at 

this time specifically requiring intermediaries and their agents to forward explanatory 

materials. Of course, to the extent that materials that accompany the Notice are “other 

soliciting materials” then our current rules29 would specifically require distribution of the 

materials. 

In response to comments, we are also making a technical change to Exchange Act 

Rule 14a-16(n). Rule 14a-16(n)(4) details the notice and access disclosures that 

registrants and other soliciting persons are not required to include in proxy materials 

when they choose to send a full set of proxy materials to security holders. Since we are 

amending the notice and access disclosure requirements in Rule 14a-16(d), we are 

making conforming changes to Rule 14a-16(n)(4). Specifically, we are revising Rule 

14a-16(n)(4)(i) to delete the reference to legend requirements that are no longer part of 

Rule 14a-16(d)(1) and to make reference to new paragraph 14a-16(d)(2) and changing the 

reference to “(d)(7)” in Rule 14a-16(n)(4)(iii) to “(d)(10)” to track the new numbering in 

Rule 14a-16(d). 

Finally, we are confirming the guidance provided in the Proposing Release that it 

is not necessary that the Notice directly mirror the proxy card. Rather, Exchange Act 

Rule 14a-16(d)(6) provides that the Notice must clearly and impartially identify each 

separate matter intended to be acted on that will be considered at the meeting. We do not 

believe the Notice has to conform to the specific Exchange Act Rule 14a-430 formatting 

and content requirements for disclosure of matters on the proxy card. 

29 See 17 CFR 240.14b-1(b)(2) and 17 CFR 240.14b-2(b)(3). 

30 17 CFR 240.14a-4. 

11
 
 

 

 

 

B. Amendment to Notice Deadlines for Soliciting Persons 

Other Than the Issuer 

We proposed to amend Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(l)(2)(ii)31 to improve the 

workability of the notice and access rules that apply to soliciting persons, other than the 

issuer, that choose to use the notice-only option.

 1. Proposed Amendment 

As we noted in the Proposing Release, the current requirement in Exchange Act 

Rule 14a-16(l)(2) that requires soliciting persons to send the Notice to shareholders 10 

calendar days after the date that the issuer first sends its proxy materials to shareholders 

can create potential compliance issues for soliciting persons. The staff review of filings 

may result in outstanding comments on a soliciting person’s preliminary proxy statement 

more than 10 calendar days after the soliciting person has initially filed. The practical 

effect of this requirement was to limit that soliciting person’s ability to use the noticeonly option if the soliciting person was unable to file its definitive proxy statement with 

the Commission by that time. To improve implementation of the notice and access 

model, we proposed to amend Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(l)(2)(ii) to require soliciting 

persons relying on this alternative32 to file a preliminary proxy statement within 10 

calendar days after the issuer files its definitive proxy statement and to send its Notice to 

shareholders no later than the date on which it files its definitive proxy statement with the 

Commission. 

31	 17 CFR 240.14a-16(l)(2)(ii). 

32	 Alternatively, a soliciting person may also send the Notice 40 calendar days before the shareholder 

meeting to which the proxy materials relate. 17 CFR 14a-16(l)(2)(i). 

12
 
 

 

 

2. Comments on the Proposed Amendment 

Comments on the proposal were limited and mixed. One commenter supported 

the Commission’s proposal for a soliciting person to file a preliminary proxy statement 

within 10 calendar days after the issuer files its definitive proxy statement and send its 

Notice no later than the date on which it files its definitive proxy statement.33 Other 

commenters expressed concern that without a specific time requirement for sending the 

Notice prior to the shareholder meeting, shareholders may not have sufficient time to 

access and consider the materials provided or obtain paper copies prior to casting their 

vote.34 

3. Final Rule 

After considering the comments, we are adopting the revisions as proposed to 

amend Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(l)(2)(ii) to require soliciting persons other than the 

issuer to file a preliminary proxy statement within 10 calendar days after the issuer files 

its definitive proxy statement and to send its Notice to shareholders no later than the date 

on which it files its definitive proxy statement with the Commission. We continue to 

believe that the time period provides sufficient time for a soliciting person to prepare its 

proxy statement and respond to any staff comments, while still permitting the soliciting 

person to use the notice and access model. While the rule does not provide for a specific 

period of time before the meeting by which a soliciting person is required to mail the 

Notice, the soliciting person should, and generally it would be in their best interest to, 

make the Notice and proxy materials available to shareholders with sufficient time for 

33 See letter from ABA. 

34 See, e.g., letters from Ameriprise, SCSGP, and S&C.
 

13
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

shareholders to review the materials and make an informed voting decision. 

C. Additional Comments on the Proposed Amendments and Actions 

Taken by the Commission 

Some commenters indicated their belief that the proposed amendments would 

result in only modest improvements.35 A number of commenters recommended revising 

the notice and access model to permit issuers to send a proxy card and business reply 

envelope, either with or without a short summary proxy statement accompanying the 

Notice in order to increase voting rates and facilitate shareholder participation.36 Other 

commenters expressed support for reducing the amount of time required for sending the 

Notice prior to the meeting from 40 days to 30 days.37 Still other commenters expressed 

concern regarding the notice and access processing fee structure, the lack of competition 

for proxy service providers and issuers’ inability to negotiate the fees which results in 

limitations on the amount of the cost savings from switching to the notice and access 

model.38 We are not addressing these issues at this time, as the Commission is still 

considering these and other ways to further encourage informed shareholder 

participation. 

Many commenters suggested that the Commission should do more to improve not 

only the notice and access model, but also the proxy process generally.39 While 

supporting the proposal, a number of commenters suggested that the Notice and lack of 

35 See, e.g., letters from ABC and R&T. 

36 See, e.g., letters from Altman, Chamber, Computershare, Edison, ICI, Intel, R&T, SCSGP, and 

STA. 

37 See, e.g., letters from ABA, ACC, Altman, Broadridge Steering Committee, Calvert, Chamber, 

Computershare, ICI, Intel, NIRI, Otter Tail, R&T, and SCSGP. 

38 See, e.g., letters from Altman, DG3, Otter Tail, NIRI, R&T, SCSGP, and STA. 

39 See, e.g., letters from ABA, ABC, Altman, BNY, Broadridge, Broadridge Steering Committee, 

Chamber, Computershare, Edison, ICI, Intel, NIRI, Otter Tail, R&T, S&C, and SCSGP. 

14
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

explanatory materials accompanying the Notice were not the primary reasons for reduced 

retail voting and advocated for more sweeping changes.40 A few commenters did not 

directly address the proposed amendments, but made broader appeals regarding the proxy 

process or provided alternative insights,41 and one commenter suggested that use of the 

notice and access model undermines investor protection and should be repealed. 42 

While we are not in this release addressing the broader concerns with the proxy 

system or the notice and access model raised by commenters that went beyond the scope 

of the proposals, we are continuing to consider these and other concerns relating to the 

proxy process that have been raised. At the direction of the Chairman, the Commission’s 

staff is conducting a comprehensive review of the mechanics by which proxies are voted 

and the way in which information is conveyed to shareholders and is preparing a concept 

release to seek public comment on these issues.43 In that review, the Commission’s staff 

will continue to monitor shareholder activity under, and the effects of, the notice and 

access model. In addition, the Commission’s staff is undertaking educational efforts to 

increase understanding of proxy mechanics generally and the notice and access model of 

delivery of proxy materials.44 

D. Technical Amendments Relating to Registered Investment Companies 

We are also adopting, as proposed, technical amendments to our rules for 

registered investment companies. Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f)(2)(iii) currently permits 

40 See, e.g., letters from ABC, Altman, ICI, NIRI, R&T, and STA. 

41 See, e.g., letters from Corporate Governance, DG3, and Moxy. 

42 See letter from IRWebReport.com.
 

43 See Speech by Chairman Mary Schapiro to the Practising Law Institute's 41st Annual Institute on 

Securities Regulation (Nov. 4, 2009) at http://sec.gov/news/speech/2009/spch110409mls.htm. 

44 Information about the Commission's educational efforts can be found at: 

http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml. 

15
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a registered investment company to accompany the Notice with a prospectus or report to 

shareholders.45 The Commission recently adopted rule amendments that permit mutual 

funds46 to satisfy their prospectus delivery obligations by sending or giving investors key 

information in the form of a summary prospectus.47 Consistent with permitting mutual 

funds to use a summary prospectus to satisfy their delivery obligations, we are revising 

our rules to permit mutual funds to accompany the Notice with a summary prospectus.48 

Commenters that addressed this issue supported the technical amendments.49 

III. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT 

A. Background 

Certain provisions of the amendments contain a “collection of information” 

within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.50 The Commission 

published a notice requesting comment on the collection of information requirements in 

the Proposing Release for the amendments, and we are submitting these requirements to 

45	 17 CFR 240.14a-16(f)(2)(iii). Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, the 

term “prospectus” means a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10(a) of the Securities 

Act [15 U.S.C. 77j(a)]. See 17 CFR 240.0-1(d). 

46	 We use the term “mutual fund” to mean a registered investment company that is an open-end 

management company as defined in Section 5(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 [15 

U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(1)]. 

47	 See Enhanced Disclosure and New Prospectus Delivery Option for Registered Open-End 

Management Investment Companies, Release No. 33-8998 (Jan. 13, 2009) [74 FR 4546]. 

Although the summary prospectus is not a Section 10(a) prospectus, it may be used to satisfy any 

prospectus delivery obligations under Section 5(b)(2) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77e(b)(2)]. 

17 CFR 230.498(c). 

48	 See amendment to Exchange Act Rule 14a-16(f)(2)(iii). We are also adopting a conforming 

amendment to Rule 498 under the Securities Act [17 CFR 230.498], which permits mutual funds 

to use a summary prospectus to satisfy their prospectus delivery obligations. Rule 498(f)(2) 

provides that a mutual fund’s summary prospectus shall be given greater prominence than any 

accompanying materials. We are amending Rule 498(f)(2) to provide that a summary prospectus 

need not be given greater prominence than an accompanying Notice. 

49	 See, e.g., letters from ABA, Calvert, and ICI. 

50 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; 5 CFR 1320.11. 

16
 
 

 

the Office of Management and Budget for review in accordance with the PRA.51 An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to comply with, a 

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Compliance 

with the rules as they are amended is mandatory; however, certain information 

collections under these rules are required and some are voluntary. Responses to the 

information collections will not be kept confidential and there is no mandatory retention 

period for the information disclosed. 

B. Summary of the Final Rules 

As discussed in more detail below, the amendments that we are adopting provide 

additional flexibility regarding the format of the Notice that is sent to shareholders, 

permit issuers and other soliciting persons to better communicate with shareholders by 

including explanatory materials regarding the reasons for the use of the notice and access 

rules and the process of receiving and reviewing proxy materials and voting, and revise 

the timeframe for delivering a Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than 

the issuer relies on the notice-only option. 

In the Proposing Release, we requested comment on the PRA analysis. We 

received no comments that addressed our burden estimates for the proposed amendments. 

1. Regulation 14A and 14C 

The titles for the collections of information for operating companies are: 

• Regulation 14A (OMB Control No. 3235-0059); and 

• Regulation 14C (OMB Control No. 3235-0057). 

44 U.S.C. 3507(d) and 5 CFR 1320.11. 

17
 

51 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We previously revised these collections of information in the release that 

proposed the notice and access model as a voluntary model for disseminating proxy 

materials52 and the release in which we adopted amendments requiring issuers and other 

soliciting persons to follow the model.53 We submitted the revisions in those releases and 

are submitting the amendments to OMB for review in accordance with the PRA. 

We have made some additional changes to the amendments, but we do not expect 

those changes to affect our estimates.54 The following table summarizes for purposes of 

the PRA the burden estimates for Schedules 14A and 14C reflecting amendments that 

permit, but do not require, an issuer or other soliciting person to include explanatory 

materials with the Notice, which are the only amendments in the release affecting our 

burden estimates: 

Table 1: Calculation of Incremental Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Estimates for Proxy and Information 

Statements 

Form Annual 

Responses 

Incremental 

Hours/Form 

Incremental 

Burden 

75% Issuer 25% 

Professional 

$400 Professional 

Cost 

 (A) (B) (C)=(A)*(B) (D)=(C)*0.75 (E)=(C)*0.25 (F)=(E)*$400 

Schedule 14A 7300 0.5 3650 2737.5 912.5 $365,000 

Schedule 14C 680 0.5 340 255 85 $34,000 

Total 7980 3990 2992.5 997.5 $399,000

 2. Rule 20a-1 

Certain provisions of the current notice and access model contain ‘‘collection of 

information’’ requirements within the meaning of the PRA, including preparation of 

Notices, maintaining Web sites, maintaining records of shareholder preferences, and 

52	 See Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Release No. 34-52926 (Dec. 8, 2005) [70 FR 74597]. 

53	 See the Internet Availability of Proxy Material Adopting Release at note 9 above. 

54	 While the revised amendments additionally permit an explanation of the reasons for an issuer’s 

use of the notice and access rules, we expect the additional explanation to be part of the same 

drafting process and to be limited to a few lines of text. Likewise, the required clarification that 

the Notice is not a form for voting should not add materially to the time to prepare the disclosure. 

We therefore believe the changes do not affect our burden estimates. 

18
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

responding to requests for copies. Those provisions increase the current burden for the 

existing collection of information entitled “Rule 20a-1 under the Investment Company 

Act of 1940,55 Solicitation of Proxies, Consents and Authorizations” (OMB Control No. 

3235-0158). Rule 20a-1 under the Investment Company Act56 requires that the 

solicitation of a proxy, consent, or authorization with respect to a security issued by an 

investment company be in compliance with Regulation 14A,57 Schedule 14A,58 and all 

other rules and regulations adopted under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act.59 It also 

requires a fund’s investment adviser, or a prospective adviser, to transmit to the person 

making a proxy solicitation the information necessary to enable that person to comply 

with the rules and regulations applicable to the solicitation. The notice and access model 

requires all registered investment companies to post their proxy materials on an Internet 

Web site and furnish Notice of the materials’ availability to shareholders.60 The Notices, 

the proxy materials posted on the Web site, and copies of the proxy materials sent in 

response to shareholder requests are not kept confidential. 

The following discussion summarizes the burden estimates for Rule 20a-1 that we 

provided in the Proposing Release. For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that the total 

annual reporting burden for Rule 20a-1 increased by approximately 1,378 hours and that 

the annual cost increased by approximately $735,000 for the services of outside 

professionals to comply with the disclosure provisions of the existing notice and access 

55 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq. 

56 17 CFR 270.20a-1. 

57 17 CFR 240.14a-1 et seq. 

58 17 CFR 240.14a-101. 

59 15 U.S.C. 78n(a). 

60 See the Internet Availability of Proxy Material Adopting Release at note 9 above. 

19
 
 

 

model. In addition, for purposes of the PRA, we estimate that a typical investment 

company issuer spends an additional five hours per year, or a total of 6,125 hours, to 

maintain these records as to which of its shareholders have made an election to receive 

proxy materials in paper or by e-mail. Further, we estimate that the additional burden to 

prepare an intermediary’s Notice is approximately one hour, or a total annual burden of 

1,225 hours for all investment company proxy solicitations. Finally, like investment 

company issuers, we estimate that the requirement to maintain records to keep track of 

which beneficial owners have made a permanent election to receive proxy materials in 

paper or by e-mail results in an additional annual burden of five hours, or a total of 6,125 

hours, for intermediaries. We received no comments on the estimates and are making no 

adjustments. In total, we estimate that the annual PRA reporting burden for current Rule 

20a-1 increased by 14,853 hours and $735,000 in professional costs to reflect compliance 

with the existing notice and access model. 

With respect to the amendments in this release, we have made some additional 

clarifying changes, but we do not expect those changes to affect our estimates. We 

estimate that the amendments that permit, but do not require, an issuer or other soliciting 

person to include explanatory materials with the Notice, increase the PRA burden 

estimates under Rule 20a-1 by approximately 459 hours and $61,250 in professional 

costs.61 

See the Proposing Release for calculations underlying the burden estimates. 

20
 

61 
 

 

 

IV. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 

A. Introduction 

We are adopting amendments designed to improve implementation of the notice 

and access model by revising the legend requirements in the rule to make them more 

flexible, permitting the Notice to be accompanied by explanatory materials regarding the 

reasons for the use of the notice and access rules and the process of receiving and 

reviewing the proxy materials and voting, and revising the timeframe for delivering a 

Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than the issuer relies on the noticeonly option.62 We received no comments on the costs and benefits of the amendments. 

We expect the amendments to: 

•	 Facilitate participation by shareholders who may be confused by the operation of 

the notice and access model; 

•	 Provide additional flexibility in describing the notice and access model; and 

•	 Facilitate participation by some soliciting persons who may currently be 

effectively precluded from using the notice-only option. 

B. Benefits 

As discussed above, by permitting some additional flexibility in designing the 

Notice and permitting explanatory materials regarding the reasons for the use of the 

notice and access rules and the process of receiving and reviewing the proxy materials 

and voting to accompany the Notice, the amendments are intended to reduce regulatory 

impediments and improve understanding of the notice and access model for participating 

We do not expect our proposed conforming amendment, which would permit mutual funds to 

accompany the Notice with a summary prospectus, to have a substantive impact on a mutual 

fund’s decision otherwise permitted under Rule 498 of the Securities Act to provide a summary 

21
 

62 
 

 

 

shareholders. Improved understanding of the model through an explanation of the 

reasons for the use of the Notice and the process of receiving and reviewing proxy 

materials and voting should reduce confusion and may thereby improve the efficiency 

and effectiveness of the proxy voting system. The benefits may be limited if issuers send 

notices to shareholders that are less likely to respond. Some commenters noted lower 

shareholder response rates under the notice and access model.63 

Revising one of the two alternative Notice deadlines applicable to soliciting 

persons other than issuers is intended to facilitate use of the notice-only option by 

soliciting persons who may otherwise be precluded from using the notice-only option 

because of their inability to meet the deadline for sending the Notice. This would help 

lower costs for those persons by reducing impediments for certain soliciting persons to 

participate in the proxy process through use of the notice-only option. 

C. Costs 

Eliminating the specific limitations of the legend requirement may result in some 

soliciting persons providing a more confusing Notice. This may increase the cost of 

shareholder participation in the proxy process, and to the extent that it affects 

participation, could distort votes and outcomes. In addition, an issuer or other soliciting 

person that chooses to include explanatory materials in the same mailing with the Notice 

will incur the cost of preparing that information. 64 For purposes of the PRA, we estimate 

prospectus instead of a statutory prospectus to its shareholders. No commenters suggested it 

would have a substantial impact. 

63	 See, e.g., Broadridge, BNY, Computershare, and R&T. 

64	 Since intermediaries and their agents already have systems to prepare and deliver proxy materials 

and the nature of the proposed changes are relatively small, we do not expect the intermediaries’ 

role in sending explanatory material to beneficial owners to affect their costs associated with the 

rule. In any event, since soliciting persons reimburse intermediaries for their reasonable expenses 

22
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

that the amendments will cause an aggregate annual increase in the compliance burden 

for operating and investment company issuers and other soliciting persons preparing 

explanatory materials of approximately 3,450 hours of in-house personnel time and 

approximately $460,000 for the services of outside professionals. 

V. CONSIDERATION OF BURDEN ON COMPETITION AND 

PROMOTION OF EFFICIENCY, COMPETITION AND CAPITAL 

FORMATION 

Section 23(a) of the Exchange Act65 requires the Commission, when making rules 

and regulations under the Exchange Act, to consider the impact a new rule would have on 

competition. Section 23(a)(2) prohibits the Commission from adopting any rule that 

would impose a burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Exchange Act. Section 2(b) of the Securities Act,66 Section 3(f) of the 

Exchange Act67 and Section 2(c) of the Investment Company Act68 require the 

Commission, when engaging in rulemaking that requires it to consider whether an action 

is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, to also consider whether the action 

would promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 

The amendments that we are adopting permit additional flexibility in designing 

the Notice, permit issuers and other soliciting persons to better communicate with 

shareholders by accompanying the Notice with explanatory materials regarding the 

reasons for the use of the notice and access rules and the process of receiving and 

of forwarding proxy materials, we do not expect intermediaries to incur costs associated with the 

rule. 

65	 15 U.S.C. 78w(a). 

66	 15 U.S.C. 77b(b). 

67	 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 

68	 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(c). 

23
 
reviewing the proxy materials and voting, and revise the timeframe for delivering a 

Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than the issuer relies on the noticeonly option. The amendments are designed to reduce regulatory impediments and 

thereby increase shareholder participation, improve implementation of the notice and 

access model, and enhance investor understanding of the operation of the notice and 

access model. These changes are intended to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of 

the proxy process. 

No commenters suggested, and we do not anticipate, any effect on competition or 

capital formation as a result of these revisions. 

VI. FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS 

This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has been prepared in accordance with 5 

U.S.C. 603. It relates to revisions to Exchange Act Rule 14a-16 and related changes that 

would permit some additional flexibility in designing the Notice, permit issuers and other 

soliciting persons to better communicate with shareholders by accompanying the Notice 

with explanatory materials regarding the reasons for the use of the notice and access rules 

and the process of receiving and reviewing the proxy materials and voting, and revise the 

timeframe for delivering a Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than the 

issuer relies on the notice-only option. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) 

was prepared in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act in conjunction with the 

Proposing Release. The Proposing Release included, and solicited comment on, the 

IRFA. 

24
 
 

 

A. Reasons for, and Objectives of, the Amendments 

 The amendments are designed to improve implementation of the notice and 

access model. Based on our monitoring of the effects of the notice and access model on 

the proxy solicitation process and the experiences that issuers and shareholders have had 

with the notice and access model to date, we believe that these revisions will improve the 

operation of the model without adversely affecting soliciting persons’ or shareholders’ 

abilities to participate effectively in the proxy process. 

Improved notice design and shareholder education should help to mitigate the 

difference in shareholder participation in the proxy voting process observed in the use of 

the notice and access model to the extent the difference was caused by the restrictions in 

our regulations. The amendment to the timing requirements for soliciting persons other 

than the issuer to file their preliminary proxy statements is designed to better enable 

soliciting persons other than the issuer to use the notice-only option. 

B. Significant Issues Raised by Commenters 

We did not receive comments specifically addressing the impact of the proposed 

amendments on small entities. 

C. Small Entities Subject to the Amendments 

The amendments affect issuers that are small entities. Exchange Act Rule 

0-10(a)69 defines an issuer to be a “small business” or “small organization” for purposes 

of the Regulatory Flexibility Act if it had total assets of $5 million or less on the last day 

of its most recent fiscal year. We estimate that there are approximately 1,100 public 

companies, other than investment companies, that may be considered small entities. 

17 CFR 240.0-10(a). 

25
 

69 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, an investment company is a small 

entity if it, together with other investment companies in the same group of related 

investment companies, has net assets of $50 million or less as of the end of its most 

recent fiscal year.70 Approximately 168 registered investment companies meet this 

definition. Moreover, approximately 33 business development companies may be 

considered small entities. 

Paragraph (c)(1) of Rule 0-10 under the Exchange Act71 states that the term “small 

business” or “small organization,” when referring to a broker-dealer, means a broker or 

dealer that had total capital (net worth plus subordinated liabilities) of less than $500,000 

on the date in the prior fiscal year as of which its audited financial statements were 

prepared pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17a-5(d);72 and is not affiliated with any person 

(other than a natural person) that is not a small business or small organization. The 

Commission has estimated that there were approximately 910 broker-dealers that 

qualified as small entities as defined above.73 Small Business Administration regulations 

define “small entities” to include banks and savings associations with total assets of $165 

million or less.74 The Commission estimates that the amendments might apply to 

approximately 9,475 banks, approximately 5,816 of which could be considered small 

banks with assets of $165 million or less.75 

70 17 CFR 270.0-10.
 

71 17 CFR 240.0-10(c)(1). 

72 17 CFR 240.17a-5(d). 

73 These numbers are based on a review by the Commission’s Office of Economic Analysis of 2005 

FOCUS Report filings reflecting registered broker-dealers. This number does not include brokerdealers that are delinquent in FOCUS Report filings. 

74 13 CFR 121.201. 

75 We note that while not subject to the amendments, the amendments may affect these entities 

because they are intermediaries that are required under the Commission’s proxy rules to forward 

26
 
 

 

D. Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements 

The amendments revise the timeframe for delivering a Notice to shareholders 

when a soliciting person other than the issuer relies on the notice-only option, require 

clarification that the Notice is not a form for voting and permit, but do not require, issuers 

or other soliciting persons to include additional, explanatory material in their Notice. 

E. Agency Action to Minimize Effect on Small Entities 

The purpose of the amendments is to improve the implementation of the notice 

and access model based on our experience with the model to date. The amendments are 

intended to improve the operation of the notice and access model by providing additional 

flexibility in designing the Notice, permitting issuers and other soliciting persons to better 

communicate with shareholders by accompanying the Notice with explanatory materials 

regarding the reasons for the use of the notice and access rules and the process of 

receiving and reviewing the proxy materials and voting, and revising the timeframe for 

delivering a Notice to shareholders when a soliciting person other than the issuer relies on 

the notice-only option. 

We considered the use of performance standards rather than design standards in 

the amendments. The amendments contain both performance standards and design 

standards. We are revising existing design standards, such as the deadline applicable to 

soliciting persons other than the issuer. However, we are imposing performance 

standards to provide issuers, other soliciting persons and intermediaries with the 

proxy materials, including the Notice or any explanatory materials, on to shareholders who 

beneficially own their shares through the intermediaries. An intermediary is not required to 

forward proxy materials to beneficial owners unless the issuer or other soliciting person provides 

assurance of reimbursement of the intermediary’s reasonable expenses incurred in connection with 

forwarding those materials. 17 CFR 240.14b-2(c)(2)(i). Therefore, any costs imposed on 

intermediaries by the rules will be borne by the issuer or other soliciting person. 

27 
flexibility to devise the means through which they can comply with such standards. For 

example, the amendments regarding explanatory materials do not dictate wording of such 

information, but allow flexibility in how to communicate the information. 

We considered different compliance standards for the small entities that will be 

affected by the amendments. In the Proposing Release, we solicited comment regarding 

the possibility of different standards for small entities. We did not receive comment on 

this particular issue. We are not aware of any different standards that would be consistent 

with the purposes of the amendments. 

VII. STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND TEXT OF THE AMENDMENTS 

The amendments described in this release are being adopted under the authority 

set forth in Sections 6, 7, 10, and 19 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Sections 

3(b), 13, 14, 15, and 23(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

Sections 8, 20(a), 24(a), 24(g), 30, and 38 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as 

amended. 

List of Subjects 

17 CFR Parts 230 and 240 

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 

For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Commission amends Title 17, Chapter 

II of the Code of Federal Regulation as follows. 

PART 230 – GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES ACT OF 

28
 

1933 
 

 

 

 

1. The authority citation for Part 230 continues to read in part as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77b, 77c, 77d, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77r, 77s, 77z-3, 77sss, 

78c, 78d, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78t, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 80a–8, 80a–24, 80a–28, 

80a–29, 80a–30, and 80a–37, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

2. Amend §230.498 by revising paragraph (f)(2) to read as follows: 

§230.498 Summary Prospectuses for open-end management investment 

companies. 

* * * * * 

(f) * * * 

(2) Greater prominence. If paragraph (c) or (d) of this section is relied on 

with respect to a Fund, the Fund’s Summary Prospectus shall be given greater 

prominence than any materials that accompany the Fund’s Summary Prospectus, with the 

exception of other Summary Prospectuses, Statutory Prospectuses, or a Notice of Internet 

Availability of Proxy Materials under §240.14a-16 of this chapter. 

* * * * * 

PART 240 – GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

3. The general authority citation for Part 240 is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z–2, 77z–3, 77eee, 77ggg, 

77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78d, 78e, 78f, 78g, 78i, 78j, 78j–1, 78k, 78k–1, 78l , 78m, 78n, 

78o, 78p, 78q, 78s, 78u–5, 78w, 78x, 78ll , 78mm, 80a–20, 80a–23, 80a–29, 80a–37, 

29
 
 

 

 

80b–3, 80b–4, 80b–11, and 7201 et seq.; and 18 U.S.C. 1350 and 12 U.S.C. 5221(e)(3), 

unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

4. Amend §240.14a-16 by: 

a. Revising paragraph (d)(1). 

b. Redesignating paragraphs (d)(2) through (d)(8) as paragraphs (d)(5) 

through (d)(11); 

c. Adding new paragraphs (d)(2) through (d)(4); 

d. Removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (f)(2)(ii); 

e. Revising paragraph (f)(2)(iii); 

f. Adding paragraph (f)(2)(iv); 

g. Revising paragraph (l)(2)(ii); 

h. Revising paragraph (n)(4)(i); and 

i. In paragraph (n)(4)(iii) removing the reference to “(d)(7)” and adding in 

its place “(d)(10)”. 

The revisions and additions read as follows: 

§240.14a-16 Internet availability of proxy materials. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

(1) A prominent legend in bold-face type that states “Important Notice 

Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting To Be Held 

on [insert meeting date]”; 

30
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

(2) An indication that the communication is not a form for voting and presents 

only an overview of the more complete proxy materials, which contain important 

information and are available on the Internet or by mail, and encouraging a security 

holder to access and review the proxy materials before voting; 

(3) The Internet Web site address where the proxy materials are available; 

(4) Instructions regarding how a security holder may request a paper or email 

copy of the proxy materials at no charge, including the date by which they should make 

the request to facilitate timely delivery, and an indication that they will not otherwise 

receive a paper or email copy; 

* * * * * 

(f) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(iii) In the case of an investment company registered under the Investment 

Company Act of 1940, the company's prospectus, a summary prospectus that satisfies the 

requirements of §230.498(b) of this chapter, or a report that is required to be transmitted 

to stockholders by section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-29(e)) 

and the rules thereunder; and 

(iv) An explanation of the reasons for a registrant’s use of the rules detailed in 

this section and the process of receiving and reviewing the proxy materials and voting as 

detailed in this section. 

* * * * * 

(l) * * * 

(2) * * * 

31
 
 

 

 

 

(ii) The date on which it files its definitive proxy statement with the 

Commission, provided its preliminary proxy statement is filed no later than 10 calendar 

days after the date that the registrant files its definitive proxy statement. 

* * * * * 

(n) * * * 

(4) * * * 

(i) Instructions regarding the nature of the communication pursuant to 

paragraph (d)(2) of this section; 

* * * * * 

By the Commission. 

 Elizabeth M. Murphy 

 Secretary 

Dated: February 22, 2010 

32