alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Application of Greater New York Brewery, Inc., et al., Respondents, for an Order Staying Arbitration between Respondents and Marcus Daly et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously modified so as to provide that only Daniel J. Casey shall be stayed from proceeding with the arbitration and as so modified affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellants. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2011 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Barry D. QuartBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John W. BeckJohn W. BeckSenior Vice President, Finance and
Operations and Chief Financial Officer (As
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear by T.D. ATF-436, 66 FR 5470, 5471, Jan. 19, 2001.

§ 17.165 Receipt of raw ingredients. For raw ingredients destined to be used in nonbeverage or intermediate products, the manufacturer shall record, for each shipment received— ( a ) The date of receipt;
( b ) The quantity received; and
( c ) The identity of the supplier.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 357

 435

 333

 315

 286

 273

 380

 329

 306

 279

 311

 264

 272

 315

 256

 225

 217

 223

 226

 220

 213

 258

 713

 661

 516

 436

 486

 610

 468

 358

 251

 259

 255

 243

 239

 241

 241

 232

 219

 219

 210

 207

 203

 202

 191

 187

 188

 189

 187

 187

 187

 187

 191

 191

 183

 185

 200

 202

 207

 194

 284

 302

 279

 270

 261

 254

 260

 252

 245

 236

 233

 221

 225

 231

 210

 208

 198

 207

 205

 199

 197

 203

 249

 245

 242

 247

 275

 311

 264

 247

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,489

 3,549

 3,583

 3,603

 3,616

 3,631

 3,652

 3,665

 3,668

 3,660

 3,643

 3,607

 3,582

 3,553

 3,479

 3,385

 3,304

 3,241

 3,185

 3,130

 3,067

 3,018

 3,022

 3,031

 3,040

 3,066

 3,116

 3,196

 3,250

 3,289

 249

 254

 256

 257

 258

 259

 261

 262

 262

 261

 260

 258

 256

 254

 249

 242

 236

 232

 228

 224

 219

 216

 216

 217

 217

 219

 223

 228

 232

 235

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### SWANSON, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF JOHAN SVENSSON, Alias JOHN LINDQUIST, Appellant, v. LINCOLN COUNTY, et al, Respondents.

(269 N. W. 375.)

(File No. 7927.

Opinion filed October 26, 1936.)

*Henry C. MuncH,*and *W. 0. Knight,*both of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Harold Bogue,*of Canton, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. We are not convinced that the record exhibits prejudicial error, and the order appealed from is affirmed.

All the Judges concur, except RUDOLPH, J., disqualified and not sitting.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       73
                                                                   Exhibit 12(c)
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                                        
 Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend
                                  Requirements

                                                   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                        (Thousands of Dollars)
                                            1990      1991      1992      1993      1994      1995
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges:
   Consolidated net income               $ 69,241  $ 57,872  $ 59,990  $ 84,464  $ 74,930  $ 86,921
Income taxes:
  Income taxes (includes amounts charged
    to  other  income  and deductions)     26,418    24,321    24,601    38,057    35,307    49,497
   Investment  tax  credit adjustment      (3,184)   (3,177)   (1,439)   (1,583)   (1,064)   (1,086)

      Total  income  taxes                 23,234    21,144    23,162    36,474    34,243    48,412

Income  before  income  taxes              92,475    79,016    83,152   120,938   109,173   135,333

Fixed Charges:
   Interest  on  long-term debt            50,119    54,370    53,408    53,706    51,173    51,146
  Amortization of debt discount,
     expense  and  premium  -  net            309       374       392       507       567       567
    Interest on short-term bank loans       1,027       935       647       220     1,157     3,144
    Other  interest                         2,259     3,297     1,011     2,023     1,537     1,598
    Interest  portion  of  rentals            902       884       683     1,077       794       925

      Total  fixed  charges                54,616    59,860    56,141    57,533    55,228    57,381
   Suppl  increment  to  fixed charges*     1,969     1,599     2,487     2,631     2,622     2,611

      Supplemental  fixed  charges         56,585    61,459    58,628    60,164    57,850    59,992
     Preferred  dividend  requirements      5,685     6,663     7,611     8,547    10,682    12,392
     Total supplemental fixed charges
       and  preferred  dividends           62,270    68,122    66,239    68,711    68,532    72,384

Supplemental  earnings  - as defined     $149,060  $140,475  $141,780  $181,102  $167,023  $195,325

Supplemental ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges  and  preferred  dividends        2.39      2.06X     2.14X     2.64X     2.44X     2.70X
<F2>
* Explanation of increment:
  Interest on the guaranty of American Falls Reservoir District Bonds
  and Milner Dam Inc. Notes which are already included in operating expense.
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBeacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. William Capp, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  F. William Capp     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| F.  William Capp         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

November 10, 2008

 

----
### SUBCHAPTER V—TRANSITION TO AND EXTENSION OF USMCA
### subpart c—general provisions
### subpart a—review of amount of duty and agreements other than quantitative restriction agreements
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 149

 163

 148

 147

 145

 142

 136

 140

 152

 143

 140

 147

 142

 136

 134

 136

 139

 130

 137

 139

 144

 141

 132

 141

 144

 139

 142

 147

 139

 146

 158

 133

 136

 142

 132

 135

 130

 131

 130

 133

 133

 132

 135

 129

 128

 127

 132

 129

 110

 108

 107

 111

 109

 111

 108

 110

 113

 110

 113

 112

 118

 123

 139

 148

 145

 139

 140

 136

 133

 133

 142

 138

 136

 140

 135

 131

 131

 134

 134

 124

 126

 126

 129

 126

 122

 127

 126

 127

 128

 128

 128

 134

 141

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 102

 107

 106

 102

 103

 100

 98

 98

 104

 101

 100

 103

 99

 97

 97

 99

 99

 93

 94

 94

 96

 94

 91

 94

 94

 94

 95

 95

 95

 99

 103

TOTAL 4,126

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 682.703 Informal compliance procedure. ( a ) The Secretary may use the informal compliance procedure in paragraph (b) of this section if the Secretary receives a complaint or other reliable information indicating that a lender or third-party servicer may be in violation of applicable laws, regulations, special arrangements, agreements, or limitations entered into under the authority of statutes applicable to Title IV of the HEA.
( b ) Under the informal compliance procedure, the Secretary gives the lender or servicer a reasonable opportunity to— ( 1 ) Respond to the complaint or information; and
( 2 ) Show that the violation has been corrected or submit an acceptable plan for correcting the violation and preventing its recurrence.
( c ) The Secretary does not delay limitation, suspension, or termination procedures during the informal compliance procedure if— ( 1 ) The delay would harm the FFEL programs; or
( 2 ) The informal compliance procedure will not result in correction of the alleged violation.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1080, 1082, 1085, 1094)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 22457, Apr. 29, 1994]
§ 682.700 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart governs the limitation, suspension, or termination by the Secretary of the eligibility of an otherwise eligible lender to participate in the FFEL programs or the eligibility of a third-party servicer to enter into a contract with an eligible lender to administer any aspect of the lender's FFEL programs. The regulations in this subpart apply to a lender or third-party servicer that violates any statutory provision governing the FFEL programs or any regulations, special arrangements, agreements, or limitations entered into under the authority of statutes applicable to Title IV of the HEA prescribed under the FFEL programs. These regulations apply to lenders that participate only in a guaranty agency program, lenders that participate in the FFEL programs, and third-party servicers that administer aspects of a lender's FFELP portfolio. These regulations also govern the Secretary's disqualification of a lender from participation in the FFEL programs under section 432(h)(2) of the Act.
( b ) This subpart does not apply— ( 1 ) ( i ) To a determination that an organization fails to meet the definition of “eligible lender” in section 435(d)(1) of the Act or the definition of “lender” in § 682.200, for any reason other than a violation of the prohibitions in section 435(d)(5) of the Act; or
( ii ) To a determination that an organization fails to meet the standards in § 682.416; or
( 2 ) To an administrative action by the Department of Education based on any alleged violation of— ( i ) The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (section 438 of the General Education Provisions Act), which is governed by 34 CFR part 99;
( ii ) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is governed by 34 CFR parts 100 and 101;
( iii ) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (relating to discrimination on the basis of handicap), which is governed by 34 CFR part 104; or
( iv ) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (relating to sex discrimination), which is governed by 34 CFR part 106.
( c ) This subpart does not supplant any rights or remedies that the Secretary may have against participating lenders under other authorities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1080, 1082, 1085, 1094)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 22456, Apr. 29, 1994; 78 FR 65822, Nov. 1, 2013]
§ 76.901 Office of Administrative Law Judges. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70340 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Office of Administrative Law Judges, established under Part E of GEPA, has the following functions: ( 1 ) Recovery of funds hearings under section 452 of GEPA.
( 2 ) Withholding hearings under section 455 of GEPA.
( 3 ) Cease and desist hearings under section 456 of GEPA.
( 4 ) Any other proceeding designated by the Secretary under section 451 of GEPA.
( b ) The regulations of the Office of Administrative Law Judges are at 34 CFR part 81.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1234)
[57 FR 30342, July 8, 1992]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Henry Behrens and Gertrud Feuerring et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,102

 5,424

 4,212

 5,093

 4,502

 3,938

 3,911

 4,005

 4,279

 3,410

 3,597

 3,469

 3,725

 4,163

 5,622

 3,546

 4,212

 4,967

 5,104

 2,939

 4,003

 4,929

 5,365

 5,326

 5,805

 6,390

 6,531

 7,735

 9,794

 7,816

 4,091

 523

 373

 447

 487

 450

 445

 472

 525

 487

 401

 431

 431

 474

 454

 465

 505

 475

 510

 530

 510

 544

 761

 555

 684

 524

 547

 573

 577

 673

 1,248

 409

 1,736

 1,739

 1,717

 1,701

 1,600

 1,507

 1,677

 1,765

 1,658

 1,126

 1,332

 1,095

 1,417

 1,774

 2,438

 1,696

 1,652

 2,305

 2,026

 1,516

 1,903

 2,514

 2,107

 2,246

 2,400

 2,747

 2,986

 3,570

 4,915

 4,225

 2,539

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 11,867

 13,186

 14,490

 15,700

 16,575

 17,148

 17,508

 17,657

 17,873

 17,747

 19,079

 20,174

 21,591

 21,844

 22,546

 22,503

 22,438

 23,042

 23,468

 23,477

 23,703

 24,452

 24,901

 26,021

 27,089

 28,741

 30,310

 32,106

 34,583

 37,112

 37,999

 848

 942

 1,035

 1,121

 1,184

 1,225

 1,251

 1,261

 1,277

 1,268

 1,363

 1,441

 1,542

 1,560

 1,610

 1,607

 1,603

 1,646

 1,676

 1,677

 1,693

 1,747

 1,779

 1,859

 1,935

 2,053

 2,165

 2,293

 2,470

 2,651

 2,714

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Innuity, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R. Wall, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and,

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 4, 2006

/s/ John R. Wall
----------------------------
John R. Wall
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Secretary
### §1337a. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1342(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1215

Section, act July 2, 1940, ch. 515, 54 Stat. 724, related to importation of products produced under process covered by claims of unexpired patent.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1342(d) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1337 of this title.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

June-07

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Jun-07 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 9 0 852 852 0 1,689 1,689 #DIV/0! 

2-Jun-07 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 9 0 853 853 0 1,692 1,692 #DIV/0! 

3-Jun-07 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 9 0 854 854 0 1,694 1,694 #DIV/0! 

4-Jun-07 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 9 0 858 858 0 1,702 1,702 #DIV/0! 

5-Jun-07 0 0 0 25 0 24 24 10 0 851 851 0 1,687 1,687 #DIV/0! 

6-Jun-07 0 0 0 23 0 12 12 9 0 850 850 0 1,685 1,685 #DIV/0! 

7-Jun-07 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 9 0 847 847 0 1,680 1,680 #DIV/0! 

8-Jun-07 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 9 0 845 845 0 1,677 1,677 #DIV/0! 

9-Jun-07 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 9 0 849 849 0 1,683 1,683 #DIV/0! 

10-Jun-07 27 0 27 16 0 0 0 5 90 845 935 178 1,677 1,855 151.7 

11-Jun-07 9 0 9 15 0 0 0 3 90 846 937 179 1,679 1,858 50.3 

12-Jun-07 30 0 30 13 0 0 0 3 89 853 941 176 1,691 1,867 170.5 

13-Jun-07 9 48 57 12 0 0 0 3 89 2,009 2,098 177 3,984 4,161 50.8 

14-Jun-07 9 0 9 9 0 12 12 3 90 2,526 2,616 178 5,010 5,188 50.6 

15-Jun-07 18 0 18 11 0 0 0 3 96 2,575 2,671 191 5,107 5,298 94.2 

16-Jun-07 9 0 9 11 0 24 24 5 97 2,575 2,672 192 5,108 5,300 46.9 

17-Jun-07 168 12 180 24 0 60 60 9 495 2,697 3,191 981 5,349 6,330 171.3 

18-Jun-07 90 0 90 31 0 0 0 9 400 2,689 3,088 793 5,333 6,126 113.5 

19-Jun-07 90 0 90 37 2 0 2 8 840 3,363 4,203 1,666 6,671 8,337 54.0 

20-Jun-07 9 0 9 38 0 24 24 9 717 3,754 4,471 1,422 7,447 8,869 6.3 

21-Jun-07 30 0 30 40 0 12 12 10 932 3,525 4,456 1,848 6,991 8,839 16.2 

22-Jun-07 57 0 57 44 0 0 0 10 934 4,017 4,950 1,852 7,967 9,819 0.0 

23-Jun-07 15 0 15 45 0 0 0 10 945 4,278 5,223 1,874 8,486 10,360 8.0 

24-Jun-07 24 0 24 45 0 0 0 10 587 4,211 4,798 1,164 8,352 9,516 20.6 

25-Jun-07 0 0 0 44 0 12 12 10 192 4,279 4,471 381 8,488 8,869 0.0 

26-Jun-07 30 0 30 44 0 12 12 11 324 4,268 4,592 642 8,466 9,108 46.7 

27-Jun-07 327 0 327 63 0 0 0 11 847 4,254 5,101 1,681 8,437 10,118 194.5 

28-Jun-07 30 0 30 65 0 0 0 10 856 4,270 5,125 1,697 8,469 10,166 17.7 

29-Jun-07 78 0 78 69 0 0 0 10 878 4,277 5,156 1,742 8,484 10,226 44.8 

30-Jun-07 390 0 390 96 0 0 0 9 1,360 4,431 5,791 2,698 8,789 11,487 144.6 

Total 1,449 60 1,509 XXXX 2 192 194 XXXX 10,946 74,199 85,145 21,712 147,174 168,886 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for June = 33,200

Delta 

Daily D

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

April 4, 2018 

p0328 

Order 

 

Clerk 

April 4, 2018 

156513 

GALAXY SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156513 

 COA: 331660 

Wayne CC: 15-003096-CK 

ASHISH KUMAR PANDEY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         115,452
<SECURITIES>                                    10,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,039
<PP&E>                                           6,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,713
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,298)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.62)


</TABLE>
Case 19-03079-KRH Doc 63 Filed 04/24/20 Entered 04/30/20 15:53:32 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 19-03079-KRH Doc 63 Filed 04/24/20 Entered 04/30/20 15:53:32 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### William M. Clark v. H. E. McDowell.

Filed May 17, 1899.

No. 8887.

Time to Prosecute Error. A proceeding' in error in tlie supreme court must be commenced within one year from the overruling of the motion for a new trial, to confer jurisdiction to review the case.

*594Error, from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

*:Dismissed.*

*William M. Ciarle, pro se.*

*Ambrose C. 'Epperson,*and *J. L. Epperson £ Sons, contra.*

Noryal, J.

The motion for a new trial was overruled and final judgment was rendered by the court below on November 23, 1895. This error proceeding was instituted in this court November 24, 1896, or more than one year after the rendition of the order sought to be reviewed. As the error proceeding was not commenced in this court within one year from the time the motion for a new trial was overruled, this court is without jurisdiction to review the case. *(Sharp v. Brown,*34 Neb. 406; *Scarborough v. Myrick,*47 Neb. 794; *Chapman v. Allen,*33 Neb. 129; *Record*v. *Butters,*42 Neb. 786.) The proceeding is ,

Dismissed.