alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,566

 2,394

 2,535

 3,054

 3,030

 2,474

 2,199

 1,754

 1,856

 1,231

 952

 1,666

 1,739

 1,888

 2,328

 2,357

 2,760

 3,466

 3,235

 3,483

 3,384

 2,565

 2,784

 2,931

 1,551

 2,308

 2,664

 1,797

 2,096

 1,928

 2,204

 289

 211

 291

 274

 263

 301

 296

 282

 277

 247

 242

 240

 249

 254

 265

 295

 323

 323

 350

 355

 327

 347

 311

 303

 293

 304

 280

 325

 342

 325

 351

 598

 582

 647

 725

 684

 682

 662

 551

 541

 476

 402

 396

 396

 437

 528

 608

 739

 835

 857

 1,073

 1,095

 875

 848

 693

 564

 538

 522

 519

 521

 531

 578

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 11,000

 10,853

 10,505

 9,999

 9,445

 9,213

 9,010

 8,692

 8,473

 8,315

 8,145

 7,991

 7,867

 7,779

 7,709

 7,735

 7,827

 7,937

 8,110

 8,501

 8,934

 9,258

 9,565

 9,782

 9,944

 10,086

 10,212

 10,294

 10,287

 10,210

 10,049

 786

 775

 750

 714

 675

 658

 644

 621

 605

 594

 582

 571

 562

 556

 551

 553

 559

 567

 579

 607

 638

 661

 683

 699

 710

 720

 729

 735

 735

 729

 718

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,900

 6,836

 6,225

 6,483

 6,100

 5,642

 5,899

 5,891

 6,052

 6,786

 6,255

 6,648

 7,002

 8,005

 7,368

 8,484

 7,256

 7,708

 6,908

 5,589

 5,602

 5,739

 6,028

 6,822

 7,990

 8,318

 8,139

 5,289

 5,619

 5,266

 1,029

 745

 623

 837

 697

 896

 941

 894

 1,053

 1,042

 995

 780

 848

 793

 1,284

 1,015

 752

 969

 958

 1,038

 993

 1,244

 1,572

 1,271

 1,360

 1,578

 1,273

 792

 818

 656

 3,553

 3,338

 3,210

 3,225

 3,020

 2,988

 3,097

 3,121

 3,355

 3,220

 2,942

 3,098

 3,300

 3,516

 3,986

 3,978

 3,693

 3,893

 3,360

 3,048

 3,089

 3,313

 3,487

 3,650

 4,185

 4,485

 4,543

 2,990

 3,246

 3,055

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 51,748

 50,668

 49,630

 48,344

 47,020

 45,797

 44,833

 44,380

 44,699

 45,234

 45,395

 45,259

 45,030

 44,983

 45,416

 46,056

 46,539

 47,207

 47,547

 47,607

 47,599

 47,791

 47,923

 48,353

 49,596

 50,983

 52,226

 51,700

 50,960

 50,037

 3,696

 3,619

 3,545

 3,453

 3,359

 3,271

 3,202

 3,170

 3,193

 3,231

 3,243

 3,233

 3,216

 3,213

 3,244

 3,290

 3,324

 3,372

 3,396

 3,401

 3,400

 3,414

 3,423

 3,454

 3,543

 3,642

 3,730

 3,693

 3,640

 3,574

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
From: Graves, Linda

Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:36 AM

To: Graves, Linda

Cc: Cymbalsky, John; Edwards, Brenda Subject: Notice of Public Meeting April 26, 2010 on the Energy Conservation Standards Preliminary Analysis and Test Procedure Notice of Prop osed Rulemaking for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts

Dear Stakeholders:

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding an informal public meeting to discuss and receive comments on the energy conservation st andards preliminary analysis and notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) on test pro cedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts. The meeting will be held on Monday, April 26, 2010, beginning at 9:00 a.m. at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 8E-089, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121.

The meeting will first cover the proposed test procedure. DOE will present the proposals in the test procedure NOPR and to respond to interested party questions. DOE will also seek input from interested pa rties on the planned methodologies, assumptions, data sources, and the NEMA Alternative Test Procedure Handout.

The second part of the public meeting give s DOE an opportunity to discuss and receive comments on: (1) the product classes that DOE analyzed for purposes of amending energy conservation standards for certain fluorescent lamp ballasts; (2) the analytical framework, models, and tools that DOE is us ing to evaluate standards for th ese products; (3) the results of preliminary analysis performed by DOE for these products; and (4) the potential energy

conservation standard levels derived from thes e analysis that DOE could consider for these products. DOE is publishing this notice of public meeting to a nnounce the availability of the preliminary technical support document which deta ils the preliminary analysis, discusses the comments on the framework document, and summari zes the preliminary results. In addition, it announces a public meeting to solicit feedback from interested parties on the analytical framework, models, and preliminary results.

The notice of proposed rulemaking on test proced ures and the notice of public meeting and availability of the preliminary technical support document on the an alysis of energy conservation

standards and further information about the m eeting are available on the following DOE website

links:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/resi dential/fluores cent_lamp_ballast

s.html

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/resi dential/fluores cent_lamp_ballast s_ecs_prelim_pub_mtg.html

Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE headquarters are subject to advance security screening procedures. If you are a foreign national and wish to attend th is meeting, please inform DOE of this fact by contacting Brenda Edwards as soon as possible, at (202) 586-2945.Linda Graves Lighting Standards Project Manager Building Technologies Program Office of Energy Effi ciency and Renewable Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW, EE-2J Washington , DC 20585-0121

202-586-1851
### §648. Custodians, generally, misusing public funds

Whoever, being an officer or other person charged by any Act of Congress with the safe-keeping of the public moneys, loans, uses, or converts to his own use, or deposits in any bank, including any branch or agency of a foreign bank (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978), or exchanges for other funds, except as specially allowed by law, any portion of the public moneys intrusted to him for safe-keeping, is guilty of embezzlement of the money so loaned, used, converted, deposited, or exchanged, and shall be fined under this title or in a sum equal to the amount of money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the amount embezzled does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2597(d), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4909; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), (2)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147, 2148; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §175 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §89, 35 Stat. 1105).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

The smaller punishment for an offense involving $100 or less was inserted. (See reviser's notes under sections 641 and 645 of this title.)

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978, referred to in text, is classified to section 3101 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(2)(G), substituted "shall be fined under this title or in a sum equal to the amount of money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned" for "shall be fined in a sum equal to the amount of money so embezzled or imprisoned".

Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(H), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" after "he shall be".

1990—Pub. L. 101–647 inserted ", including any branch or agency of a foreign bank (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 1(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978)," after "or deposits in any bank".
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Adsero  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Smith,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respect,  the financial  condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ William Smith
--------------------------------
Name:  William Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  Date: August 26, 2004
#### § 76.530 General cost principles.

The general principles to be used in determining costs applicable to grants, subgrants, and cost-type contracts under grants and subgrants are specified at 2 CFR part 200, subpart E—Cost Principles.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)

[79 FR 76093, Dec. 19, 2014]
FILED

IN SUPREME COURT

OFTEXAS ^ ^ A 0 "2 "?7

APR 18 2011 I rUlJ^

BLAKE HAWTHORNE, Clert^

ROGER SLUDER § INTHE DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

CAROL JOYCE OGDEN §

Defendant. § OF BLANCO COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION

AND ORDER FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13

OF THE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

On January 8, 2010, the Court heard the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule

13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure which was brought by the Defendant, Carole

Joyce Ogden.

All parties appeared by their attorneys and announced ready. After examining all

the pleadings and hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the Court finds:

1. that this Court has jurisdiction of this proceeding;

2. that the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of

Civil Procedure filed is in all respects proper and sufficient;

3. that Plaintiff received due and proper notice ofthese proceedings;

4. that Plaintiff, Roger Sluder filed pleadings in this matter which failed to state

a cause of action. Further the Court finds that the Petition filed was

groundless, brought in bad faith and brought for the purpose of

harassment;

5. that Plaintiff's attorney of record, Richard Wagner, Texas State Bar

No.20661050, signed pleadings in this matter which failed to state a

cause of action. Further the Court finds that the Petition filed was

groundless, brought in bad faith and brought for the purpose of

h9ra«mfln(. DEBBY ELSBURY harassment, clerk district court bunco county, texas

FILED

JAN 2 9 2010

AT &-AJ qCLQCK ^ $ U

BY_
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that:

The above numbered Cause No. CV-06875 styled RODGER SLUDER vs.

CAROL JOYCE OGDEN is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under the

authority of Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

Plaintiff, Roger Sluder AND his attorney of record Richard Wagner, will pay to

Lawrence B. Shallcross, two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) by cash, money

order or cashier's check on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 29, 2010 as an

appropriate sanction for attorney fees, pursuant to 215.2(b) of the Texas

Rules of Civil Procedure.

ALL RELIEF NOT SPECIFICALLY GRANTED HEREIN IS DENIED.

SIGNED on t)[j^^y?f, Cnv** /7 . 2010

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lawrence B. Shallcross

Attorney for Plaintiff Carole Joyce Ogden

2631 Bulverde Road, Ste. 105

Bulverde, Texas 78163

Tel: (830) 980-5757

Fax: (830) 438-4835

The Honorable Dan H. Mills

424* JUDICIAL DISTRICTCOURT
(No. 6773

#### Northeast Community Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 22, 1972.*

Northeast Community Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

*72William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 255

 267

 267

 266

 262

 249

 242

 247

 249

 252

 251

 259

 279

 264

 261

 263

 262

 261

 281

 255

 241

 239

 261

 228

 229

 213

 182

 190

 183

 201

 202

 228

 239

 245

 232

 224

 222

 222

 227

 229

 236

 243

 249

 255

 253

 253

 253

 241

 241

 230

 228

 213

 226

 219

 206

 207

 163

 155

 157

 160

 163

 170

 236

 250

 252

 252

 244

 233

 229

 233

 236

 241

 247

 253

 261

 258

 256

 257

 257

 253

 254

 242

 230

 233

 232

 221

 218

 183

 167

 168

 172

 173

 178

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,437

 3,452

 3,463

 3,461

 3,445

 3,409

 3,370

 3,331

 3,302

 3,300

 3,324

 3,357

 3,393

 3,425

 3,445

 3,452

 3,457

 3,458

 3,468

 3,477

 3,478

 3,478

 3,474

 3,454

 3,425

 3,355

 3,261

 3,171

 3,087

 3,003

 2,924

 246

 247

 247

 247

 246

 244

 241

 238

 236

 236

 237

 240

 242

 245

 246

 247

 247

 247

 248

 248

 248

 248

 248

 247

 245

 240

 233

 227

 221

 215

 209

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Phantom 3

Purchased from DJI.com

Phantom 3 Specs.

Weight (Including Battery And 

Propellers)

1280 g

Diagonal Size (Including Propellers)

590 mm

Max Ascent Speed

5 m/s

Max Descent Speed

3 m/s

Hover Accuracy

Vertical: +/- 10cm

Horizontal: +/- 1m

Max Speed

16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Altitude Above Sea Level

6000 m

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode

GPS/GLONASS

Camera

Sensor

Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens

FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

ISO Range

100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo)

Shutter Speed

8s -1/8000s

Image Max Size

4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single Shot

Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Video Recording Modes

Phantom 3 Professional

UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Phantom 3 Advanced

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Max Bitrate Of Video Storage

60 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

Gimbal

Controllable Range

Pitch -90° to +30°

Stabilization

3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

Vision Positioning

Max Velocity

Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

Altitude Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment

Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

Remote Controller

Operating Frequency

2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Max Distance

2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

Video Output Port

USB

Operating Temperature
0°C- 40°C

Battery

6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder

For tablet or phone

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

101 dBm ±2 dBm

Transmitter Power (EIRP)

FCC: 20 dBm

CE: 16 dBm

Working Voltage

1.2 A @7.4 V

Battery Charger

Voltage

17.4 V

Rated Power

Phantom 3 Professional

100 W

Phantom 3 Advanced

57 W

Intelligent Flight Battery

Capacity

4480 mAh

Voltage

15.2 V

Battery Type

LiPo 4S

Energy

68 Wh

Net Weight

365 g

Max Flight Time

Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature

-10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power

100 W

App / Live View

Mobile App

DJI Pilot

EIRP

100mW

Live View Working Frequency

2.4GHz ISM

Live View Quality

720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Latency

220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Required Operating Systems

iOS 8.0 or later

Android 4.1.2 or later

Recommended Devices

iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad 

mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus

Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, Nubia Z7 mini

*Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KRISTIN LEE GUOAN FISHER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4295 ) BARRY HOEY, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Mary C. Evans, Judge. Michael E. Chionopoulos, Fort Myers, Bartow, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
      10.2

    FORM OF AGREEMENT

    


    WHEREAS
      under
      a
      Subscription Agreement
      in 2006, SPO Medical Inc. (“SPO”) sold Subscriber (named below) certain SPO
      securities consisting of (i) a 8% promissory notes with interest and principal
      repayable at the end of 12 months (the “Note”); and (ii) a two year common stock
      purchase warrant to purchase 16,250 shares of Common Stock of the Company for
      each $25,000 of principal loaned to Company (the “Warrant”); and 

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      parties hereto wish to convert the Note to shares of common Stock of SPO and
      determine a Warrant exercise price, subject to the following terms and
      conditions.

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE,
      in
      consideration of the above and the terms and conditions hereof, the parties
      agree as follows:

    


    1. The
      Note.
      Effective the date hereof, the Note and all interest accrued thereunder shall
      be
      converted to shares of Common Stock of SPO at the conversion price of $0.90
      per
      share, and the Note shall be deemed fully paid and satisfied. Upon signature
      of
      this agreement the Note will be deemed null and void. SPO shall issue and
      deliver to Subscriber (at the address below) certificates for such shares with
      a
      restrictive legend required under law.

    


    2. The
      Warrant.
      Effective the date hereof, the Per
      Share
      Warrant Price,
      as
      defined in the Warrant, shall be $0.90. 

    


    3. With
      the
      exception of the above, the other provisions of the Subscription Agreement
      and
      Warrants shall remain “as is”.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties have executed this Agreement as of the __ day of July 2007.

    


    
      	
              SPO
                Medical Inc.

            	
              Subscriber

            
	 	 
	
              _______________

            	 
	
              Per:
                Michael Braunold

            	
              _________________________

            
	
              President
                & CEO

            	 
	 	 
	 	
              Print
                Name:________________

            
	 	 
	 	
              Address:

            
	 	 
	 	
              _________________________

            
	 	 
	 	
              __________________________
Ex-10.4



 





EXHIBIT 10.4




PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP COMPANY




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 2006 CASH INCENTIVE PLAN




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 2006 CASH INCENTIVE PLAN is hereby adopted by Performance Food
Group Company, a Tennessee corporation (the “Company”) effective as of August 22, 2007.



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Performance Food Group Company 2006 Cash Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan such that no payments due thereunder would
cause any participant to incur any additional tax under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the “Code”);



     NOW, THEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, the Company hereby amends the Plan as
follows:



     1. Specification of Payment Date for Performance Awards. The first sentence of
Section 5(e) of the Plan shall be stricken and the following inserted in its stead:




“The amount of the Award payable as determined by the Committee for any Performance
Period shall be paid to the Participant between the first day following the close of
the Performance Period and the fifteenth day of the third month following the close
the Performance Period, or as soon as practicable thereafter, as the Committee shall
determine.”
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Altrimega  Health  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    August 6, 2004                  By:    /s/ John W. Gandy
                                               ---------------------------------
                                        Name:  John W. Gandy
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date:    August 6, 2004                  By:    /s/ Ron Hendrix
                                               ---------------------------------
                                        Name:  Ron Hendrix
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Altrimega Health
Corporation and will be retained by Altrimega  Health  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1