alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23
                        Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-20842,  33-20859,  33-86232,  33-86236,  333-06371,   333-04953,   333-19833,
333-45255  and  333-57743  of  Cavalier  Homes,  Inc.  on form  S-8,  and to the
incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration   Statements  Nos.  33-62487  (as
amended), 33-63060 (as amended), 33-86348 (as amended),  333-18213 (as amended),
333-00607  (as  amended),  333-48111(as  amended) and  333-64925 (as amended) of
Cavalier  Homes,  Inc.  on Form  S-3 of our  report  dated  February  19,  1999,
appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Cavalier  Homes,  Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 26, 1999
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency [FRL-9289-4]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Notice of availability.
 SUMMARY: This notice announces final agency action on three TMDLs prepared by EPA Region 6 for waters listed in Louisiana's Mississippi River Basin, under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Documents from the administrative record file for the three TMDLs, including TMDL calculations and responses to comments, may be viewed at 
                        *http://www.epa.gov/​region6/​water/​npdes/​tmdl/​index.htm.*
                         The administrative record file may be examined by calling or writing Ms. Diane Smith at the address below. Please contact Ms. Smith to schedule an inspection.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Smith, Environmental Protection Specialist, Water Quality Protection Division, U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202-2733, (214) 665-2145.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1996, two Louisiana environmental groups, the Sierra Club and Louisiana Environmental Action Network (plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit in Federal Court against the EPA, styled 
                    *Sierra Club, et al.*
                     v.
                    *Clifford et al.,*
                     No. 96-0527, (E.D. La.). Among other claims, plaintiffs alleged that EPA failed to establish Louisiana TMDLs in a timely manner. EPA established three of these TMDLs pursuant to a consent decree entered in this lawsuit. EPA Takes Final Agency Action on Three TMDLs By this notice EPA is taking final agency action on the following three TMDLs on waters located within the Louisiana Mississippi River Basin: Subsegment
Waterbody name
Pollutant070401
Mississippi River Passes (estuarine)
Fecal Coliform.070502
Thompson Creek
Fecal Coliform.070503
Capitol Lake
Fecal Coliform.
 EPA requested the public provide to EPA any significant water quality related data or information that might impact the three TMDLs in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     Notice: volume 75, number 37, page 8698 (February 25, 2010). The comments which were received, EPA's response to comments, as well as the TMDLs may be found at 
                    *http://www.epa.gov/​region6/​water/​npdes/​tmdl/​index.htm.* Dated: March 28, 2011. Miguel I. Flores, Director, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region 6.


[FR Doc. 2011-7906 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James G. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Education Lending Group, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

Theamended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)) and

2.

The information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: February 27, 2004 |   | By:     | /s/ JAMES G. CLARK          |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------|-----------------------------|
|                    |   |         |                             |
|                    |   | Name:   | **James G. Clark**          |
|                    |   | Title:  | **Chief Financial Officer** |
§ 300.700 Grants to States. ( a ) *Purpose of grants.* The Secretary makes grants to States, outlying areas, and freely associated States (as defined in § 300.717), and provides funds to the Secretary of the Interior, to assist them to provide special education and related services to children with disabilities in accordance with Part B of the Act.
( b ) *Maximum amount.* The maximum amount of the grant a State may receive under section 611 of the Act is— ( 1 ) For fiscal years 2005 and 2006— ( i ) The number of children with disabilities in the State who are receiving special education and related services— ( A ) Aged three through five, if the State is eligible for a grant under section 619 of the Act; and
( B ) Aged 6 through 21; multiplied by—
( ii ) Forty (40) percent of the average per-pupil expenditure in public elementary schools and secondary schools in the United States (as defined in § 300.717); and
( 2 ) For fiscal year 2007 and subsequent fiscal years— ( i ) The number of children with disabilities in the 2004-2005 school year in the State who received special education and related services— ( A ) Aged three through five if the State is eligible for a grant under section 619 of the Act; and
( B ) Aged 6 through 21; multiplied by
( ii ) Forty (40) percent of the average per-pupil expenditure in public elementary schools and secondary schools in the United States (as defined in § 300.717);
( iii ) Adjusted by the rate of annual change in the sum of— ( A ) Eighty-five (85) percent of the State's population of children aged 3 through 21 who are of the same age as children with disabilities for whom the State ensures the availability of FAPE under Part B of the Act; and
( B ) Fifteen (15) percent of the State's population of children described in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) of this section who are living in poverty.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1411(a) and (d))
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

April-07

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3,306 3,347 6,653 6,558 6,639 13,197 0.0 2-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2,954 3,590 6,544 5,859 7,121 12,980 0.0 3-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 2,272 3,589 5,861 4,507 7,118 11,625 0.0 4-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 5 2,545 3,581 6,126 5,048 7,102 12,150 0.0 5-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 5 4,058 3,573 7,631 8,050 7,087 15,137 0.0 6-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 5 2,909 3,572 6,481 5,770 7,085 12,855 0.0 7-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 4 12 16 6 2,446 3,562 6,008 4,851 7,065 11,916 0.0 8-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2,423 3,604 6,027 4,806 7,149 11,955 0.0 9-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2,159 3,600 5,759 4,282 7,141 11,423 0.0 

10-Apr-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1,330 3,584 4,914 2,638 7,108 9,746 0.0 

11-Apr-07 0 12 12 1 0 12 12 6 2,288 3,577 5,864 4,538 7,094 11,632 0.0 12-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 24 24 6 2,178 3,593 5,771 4,320 7,126 11,446 0.0 

13-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 4 12 16 8 2,393 3,555 5,948 4,747 7,051 11,798 0.0 14-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2,480 3,542 6,022 4,919 7,025 11,944 0.0 

15-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2,409 3,561 5,970 4,779 7,063 11,842 0.0 16-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 3,390 3,556 6,946 6,725 7,053 13,778 0.0 17-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2,704 3,519 6,222 5,363 6,979 12,342 0.0 18-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 4 0 4 6 2,398 3,573 5,972 4,757 7,088 11,845 0.0 19-Apr-07 0 12 12 2 3 0 3 6 2,431 3,564 5,995 4,822 7,069 11,891 0.0 20-Apr-07 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 6 2,669 3,016 5,685 5,294 5,983 11,277 0.0 21-Apr-07 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 2,992 2,797 5,789 5,935 5,548 11,483 0.0 22-Apr-07 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 640 1,538 2,178 1,269 3,051 4,320 0.0 

23-Apr-07 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 660 1,006 1,667 1,310 1,996 3,306 0.0 

24-Apr-07 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 445 1,002 1,447 883 1,987 2,870 0.0 

25-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1,037 464 1,501 2,057 920 2,977 0.0 

26-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 669 852 1,521 1,327 1,689 3,016 0.0 

27-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 676 846 1,522 1,340 1,679 3,019 0.0 

28-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 674 847 1,521 1,337 1,680 3,017 0.0 

29-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 4 0 4 1 672 851 1,522 1,332 1,687 3,019 0.0 

30-Apr-07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 727 851 1,578 1,442 1,687 3,129 0.0 

Total 0 24 24 XXXX 46 60 106 XXXX 60,935 81,709 142,644 120,865 162,070 282,935 XXXX 

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for April = 1,100

Delta 

Daily D

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP
### §3365. Amendment of information—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Amendment of information, time and conditions, Rule 7(e).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 830.)
A/73308543.1 

ABR SPRING MEETING 

CHARLESTON, SC 

May 19-21, 2010 

Wednesday, May 19

4:30 - 6:00 p.m. Board of Directors Meeting 

7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Cocktail Reception and Dinner 

Thursday, May 20

7:30 - 9:00 a.m. ILA Executive Meeting 

9:00 - 9:45 a.m. “DOT Investigation of Improper Shipment of Batteries,” 

Bob Strollo, Senior Investigator, U.S. DOT/PHMSA 

9:45 - 10:30 a.m. “EPA Projected MACT and Residual Risk Rulemakings 

Under the CAA for Secondary Lead Smelters,” 

Chuck French, EPA OAQPS, Metals and Minerals Group 

10:30 - 10:45 a.m. Coffee Break 

10:45 - 11:30 a.m. “OSHA’s Focus for 2010 and Beyond,” 

Kurt A. Petermeyer, OSHA Area Director, Mobile Area Office 

11:30 - 12:00 p.m. “An Update on ILA and ILZRO Activities,” 

David Wilson, ILA 

Craig Boreiko, ILZRO 

Friday, May 21

8:30 - 9:15 a.m. “Recontamination in Herculaneum and Derivation of the Pb NAAQS,” 

Terri Bowers, Gradient Corp. 

9:15 - 10:00 a.m. “Better Lead Battery Performance Via Grid Alloys and Carbons,” 

David Prengaman, RSR Corporation 

10:00 - 10:15 a.m. Coffee Break 

10:15 - 11:00 a.m. “An Update on EPA’s Consideration of MACT and Residual Risk Rules,” 

Russell Kemp, ENVIRON Corp. 

11:00 - 11:45 a.m. “Integrating OSHA Lead Compliance With Ambient Air Compliance,” 

Martin J. Stromberger, RMT 

11:45 - 12:00 p.m. Business Meeting and Closing Remarks 

Earl Cornette, Chairman, ABR
July 18, 2013



### Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office des transports du Canada

Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation X40, suite 6402 400 7th Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Gretch Reference: OST 2006-24269 Canadian Transportation Agency

M4820-U5-19

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions ofthe Air Transport Agreement between Canada and the United States ofAmerica, signed March 12, 2007 (Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis ofcomity and reciprocity. Yours sincerely

# .~~~~ Catherine MacDonald Manager International Agreements,

cc Martin Loken, ANA Marc Rioux, ACEA. Brian Hedberg, US DoT Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 www.cta-otc.gc.ca

# Canada Ottawa Ontario K1 A ON9 www.cta-otc .gc.ca
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 17, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    James D. Bowden
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | James D. Bowden                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 17, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Steven L. Suss 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Steven L. Suss                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Danny Ray Guttery, * From the 29th District

 Court of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. 14646.

Vs. No. 11-12-00160-CR * July 10, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5130 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5130

To amend the Small Business Act to adjust the employment size standard 
requirements for determining whether a manufacturing concern is a small 
               business concern, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2019

Mr. Veasey (for himself and Mr. Kevin Hern of Oklahoma) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to adjust the employment size standard 
requirements for determining whether a manufacturing concern is a small 
               business concern, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Capturing All Small Businesses Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT SIZE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(a)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 632(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``and subject to the 
        requirements specified under subparagraph (C)'' after 
        ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(including the Administration 
                when acting pursuant to subparagraph (A))'' after ``no 
                Federal department or agency''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii)(I) by striking ``12 months'' and 
                inserting ``24 months''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act 
shall take effect one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

ATLANTIC SECURITY, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Atlantic Security, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Terence Sullivan, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Terence Sullivan
------------------------------------
Terence Sullivan
Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2005
§ 686.10 Application. To receive a grant under this part, a student must— ( a ) Complete and submit the Free application for Federal student aid (FAFSA) in accordance with the instructions in the FAFSA;
( b ) Complete and sign an agreement to serve or repay in accordance with § 686.12; and
( c ) Provide any additional information requested by the Secretary and the institution.
[85 FR 49822, Aug. 14, 2020]
(No. 7007

#### Gulf Oil Company—U.S., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

Gulf Oil Company—U.S., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 7,966

 7,702

 6,583

 6,759

 6,231

 5,966

 5,747

 5,371

 5,927

 6,952

 6,432

 7,010

 7,208

 8,159

 7,516

 8,188

 8,036

 8,282

 7,487

 5,884

 5,964

 6,022

 6,855

 7,178

 7,845

 8,427

 8,058

 7,128

 6,593

 7,198

 1,143

 818

 757

 846

 813

 989

 922

 881

 1,018

 1,054

 999

 808

 894

 804

 1,335

 1,089

 780

 1,062

 1,175

 1,093

 1,195

 1,326

 1,676

 1,374

 1,405

 1,645

 1,277

 790

 811

 679

 4,285

 3,630

 3,325

 3,357

 3,303

 3,203

 3,155

 3,031

 3,287

 3,314

 3,096

 3,412

 3,674

 3,885

 4,084

 4,067

 4,003

 4,147

 3,691

 3,360

 3,343

 3,496

 3,741

 4,085

 4,290

 4,566

 4,559

 3,625

 3,702

 3,608

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 56,539

 55,479

 54,092

 52,453

 51,075

 49,791

 48,774

 48,084

 48,112

 48,399

 48,230

 48,157

 48,062

 47,957

 47,756

 48,193

 48,871

 49,661

 50,049

 50,206

 50,394

 50,859

 51,313

 52,084

 53,278

 54,432

 55,317

 55,057

 54,675

 54,216

 4,039

 3,963

 3,864

 3,747

 3,648

 3,557

 3,484

 3,435

 3,437

 3,457

 3,445

 3,440

 3,433

 3,426

 3,411

 3,442

 3,491

 3,547

 3,575

 3,586

 3,600

 3,633

 3,665

 3,720

 3,806

 3,888

 3,951

 3,933

 3,905

 3,873

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ATTENDEES

Terry Logee, Office of Codes and Standards

Ed Levy, General Counsel

Cyrus Nasseri, Office of Codes and Standards

Jim Raba, Office of Codes and Standards

Michael McCabe, Office of Codes and Standards

Deborah Miller, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

Steve Treado, National Institute of Standards and Technology

iii i s C

EE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27B-6
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




EXHIBIT 10.119




AMENDMENT NO. 5

TO

T-MOBILE USA SERVICE PARTNER

SERVICES AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 5, dated September 26, 2007 (this “Fifth Amendment”) is made to that
certain T-Mobile USA Service Partner Services Agreement, dated August 1, 2005, as amended by that
certain Amendment No. 1, dated June 23, 2006, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 dated
April 2007, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 3 dated July 31, 2007, and as amended by that
certain Amendment No. 4 dated August 30, 2007, between StarTek USA, Inc., a Colorado corporation
(“Service Partner”), with a principal place of business at 100 Garfield Street, Denver, Colorado
80206, and T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“T-Mobile USA”), with offices for business
at 12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, Washington 98006 (the “Agreement”). Except as specifically
defined otherwise herein, all terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings when used
in this Fifth Amendment.



Service Partner and T-Mobile agree as follows:



1. A new Section 3.1 is hereby added to the Agreement, which shall read in its entirety as
follows:



3.1 Unless terminated sooner as provided herein this Agreement shall commence as of the
Effective Date and continue for a period of one (1) year.



3.1.1 This Agreement shall automatically renew until October 15, 2007, unless either Party
provides written notice of non-renewal to the other Party at least ninety (90) days prior to the
expiration of the current term, October 1, 2007.



2. The amendments made to the Agreement by this Fifth Amendment will be effective as of the
date of this Fifth Amendment. The Agreement, as supplemented and amended by this Fifth Amendment,
remains in full force and effect. To the extent the terms of this Fifth Amendment conflict with
any provisions of the Agreement, this Fifth Amendment shall govern.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	T-MOBILE USA, INC.	 	STARTEK USA, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ BETTY JONES
	 	By:
	 	/s/ PATRICK M. HAYES
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Betty Jones
	 	Name:
	 	Patrick M. Hayes
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Vice President, Customer Care
	 	Title:
	 	COO
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date Signed:

	 	 
	 	Date Signed:
	 	28 Sept ‘07
§ 662.20 How is a Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellow selected? ( a ) The Secretary considers applications for fellowships under this program that have been screened and submitted by eligible institutions. The Secretary evaluates these applications on the basis of the criteria in § 662.21.
( b ) The Secretary does not consider applications to carry out research in a country in which the United States has no diplomatic representation.
( c ) In evaluating applications, the Secretary obtains the advice of panels of United States academic specialists in modern foreign languages and area studies.
( d ) The Secretary gives preference to applicants who have served in the armed services of the United States if their applications are equivalent to those of other applicants on the basis of the criteria in § 662.21.
( e ) The Secretary considers information on budget, political sensitivity, and feasibility from binational commissions or United States diplomatic missions, or both, in the proposed country or countries of research.
( f ) The Secretary presents recommendations for recipients of fellowships to the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board, which reviews the recommendations and approves recipients.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456)