5790 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices 

authorization under this general permit, 

an alternative permit, or denial of 

permit coverage. 

EPA—Region 1 will provide an 

opportunity for the public to comment 

on each NOI that is submitted. 

Following the public notice, EPA— 

Region 1 will either authorize the 

discharge, request additional 

information, or require the small MS4 to 

apply for an alternative permit or an 

individual permit. 

Water Quality-Based Effluent 

Limitations 

The draft permit includes provisions 

to ensure that discharges do not cause 

or contribute to exceedances of water 

quality standards. The provisions in 

Parts 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 of the general 

permit constitute the water qualitybased effluent limitations of the permit. 

The purpose of this part of the permit 

is to establish the board inclusion of 

water quality-based effluent limitations 

for those discharges requiring additional 

controls in order to achieve water 

quality standards and other water 

quality related objectives, consistent 

with 40 CFR 122.44(d). The nonnumeric effluent limitation 

requirements of this permit are 

expressed in the form of control 

measures and BMPs (see Part 2.4 of the 

general permit). 

Non-Numeric Effluent Limitations 

When EPA has not promulgated 

effluent limitations for a category of 

discharges, or if an operator is 

discharging a pollutant not covered by 

an effluent limitation guideline, effluent 

limitations may be based on the best 

professional judgment (BPJ) of the 

agency or permit writer. The BPJ limits 

in the general permit are in the form of 

non-numeric control measures, 

commonly referred to as best 

management practices (BMPs). Nonnumeric limits are employed under 

limited circumstances, as described in 

40 CFR 122.44(k). EPA has interpreted 

the CWA to allow BMPs to take the 

place of numeric effluent limitations 

under certain circumstances. 40 CFR 

122.44(k) provides that permits may 

include BMPs to control or abate the 

discharge of pollutants when: ‘‘(1) 

[a]uthorized under section 304(e) of the 

CWA for the control of toxic pollutants 

and hazardous substances form 

ancillary industrial activities; (2) 

[a]uthorized under section 402(p) of the 

CWA for the control of stormwater 

discharges; (3) [n]umeric effluent 

limitations are infeasible; or (4) [t]he 

practices are reasonable to achieve 

effluent limitations and standards or to 

carry out the purposes and intent of the 

CWA.’’ The permit regulates stormwater 

discharges using BMPs. Due to the 

variability associated with stormwater, 

EPA believes the use of BMPs is the 

most appropriate method to regulate 

discharges of stormwater from 

municipal systems in accordance with 

the above referenced regulation. 

The draft permit requires small MS4s 

to continue to control stormwater 

discharges from the municipal system in 

a manner designed to reduce the 

discharge of pollutant to the maximum 

extent practicable and to protect water 

quality. The small MS4s are required to 

implement a SWMP consisting of 

control measures. These control 

measures include the following: public 

education and outreach; public 

participation; illicit discharge detection 

and elimination; construction 

stormwater management; stormwater 

management in new development and 

redevelopment; and good housekeeping 

in municipal operations. 

Implementation of the SWMP involves 

the identification of BMPs and 

measurable goals for BMPs. The draft 

permit identifies an objective for each 

control measure. The small MS4 must 

implement the control measures 

required by the general permit and 

document actions in the SWMP that 

demonstrate progress toward 

achievement of the objective of the 

control measure. The permit also 

contains outfall monitoring 

requirements that are associated with 

implementation of the illicit discharge 

detection and elimination program, 

recordkeeping and reporting. 

Dated: January 25, 2010. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, Region 1. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2399 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9110–5] 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; 

Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 

92–463, notice is hereby given that the 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board 

(GNEB) will hold a public 

teleconference on February 25, 2010 

from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard 

Time. The meeting is open to the public. 

For further information regarding the 

teleconference and background 

materials, please contact Dolores 

Wesson at the number listed below. 

Background: GNEB is a Federal 

advisory committee chartered under the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 

92463. GNEB provides advice and 

recommendations to the President and 

Congress on environmental and 

infrastructure issues along the U.S. 

border with Mexico. 

Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of 

this teleconference is to continue 

discussion on the Good Neighbor 

Environmental Board’s Thirteenth 

Report. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you 

wish to make oral comments or submit 

written comments to the Board, please 

contact Dolores Wesson at least five 

days prior to the meeting. 

General Information: Additional 

information concerning the GNEB can 

be found on its Web site at http:// 

www.epa.gov/ocem/gneb. 

Meeting Access: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact Dolores 

Wesson at (202) 564–1351 or e-mail at 

wesson.dolores@epa.gov. To request 

accommodation of a disability, please 

contact Dolores Wesson at least 10 days 

prior to the meeting to give EPA as 

much time as possible to process your 

request. 

Dated: January 29, 2010. 

Dolores Wesson, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2384 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0045; FRL–8807–5] 

Notice of Receipt of Several Pesticide 

Petitions Filed for Residues of 

Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various 

Commodities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

Agency’s receipt of several initial filings 

of pesticide petitions proposing the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various commodities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 8, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices 5791 

number and the pesticide petition 

number (PP) of interest as shown in the 

body of this document, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

the docket ID number and the pesticide 

petition number of interest as shown in 

the body of this document. EPA’s policy 

is that all comments received will be 

included in the docket without change 

and may be made available on-line at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD-ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The Docket Facility telephone 

number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

contact person, with telephone number 

and e-mail address, is listed at the end 

of each pesticide petition summary. You 

may also reach each contact person by 

mail at Registration Division (7505P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

•Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed at the end of the 

pesticide petition summary of interest. 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD-ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD-ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low-income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have a typical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
5792 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices 

II. What Action is the Agency Taking? 

EPA is announcing its receipt of 

several pesticide petitions filed under 

section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 

346a, proposing the establishment or 

modification of regulations in 40 CFR 

part 174 or part 180 for residues of 

pesticide chemicals in or on various 

food commodities. EPA has determined 

that the pesticide petitions described in 

this notice contain the data or 

information prescribed in FFDCA 

section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not 

fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 

submitted data at this time or whether 

the data support granting of the 

pesticide petitions. Additional data may 

be needed before EPA can make a final 

determination on these pesticide 

petitions. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a 

summary of each of the petitions that 

are the subject of this notice, prepared 

by the petitioner, is included in a docket 

EPA has created for each rulemaking. 

The docket for each of the petitions is 

available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

As specified in FFDCA section 

408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)), EPA is 

publishing notice of the petition so that 

the public has an opportunity to 

comment on this request for the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticides in 

or on food commodities. Further 

information on the petition may be 

obtained through the petition summary 

referenced in this unit. 

New Tolerances 

1. PP 9E7606. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0906). Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., 

410 Swing Road, P.O. Box 18300, 

Greensboro, NC 27419–8300, proposes 

to establish an import tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

fungicide isopyrazam (SYN520453), in 

or on banana at 0.05 parts per million 

(ppm). An adequate, validated method 

(GRM006.01B) is available for 

enforcement purposes for the 

determination of residues of 

isopyrazam, analyzed as the isomers 

SYN534968 and SYN534969, in crop 

samples. The limit of quantitation 

(LOQ) has been set at 0.005 mg/kg for 

each isomer (0.01 mg/kg for SYN520453 

in total). Final determination is by 

liquid chromatography-mass 

spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS). An analytical method suitable 

for the determination of residues of the 

metabolites CSCD459488 and 

CSCD459489 (syn and anti forms 

respectively) in crop samples using an 

external standardization procedure is 

also available (GRM006.03A). The LOQ 

has been set at 0.005 mg/kg for both 

analytes. Final determination is by LCMS/MS. Contact: Shaunta Hill, (703) 

347–8961; hill.shaunta@epa.gov. 

2. PP 9E7632. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0861). The Interregional Research 

Project No. 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road 

East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540, 

proposes to establish a tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

insecticide spirodiclofen, (3-(2,4- 

dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1- 

oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl 2,2- 

dimethylbutanoate), in or on the 

bushberry subgroup 13-07B at 4.0 ppm. 

Adequate analytical methodology using 

LC-MS/MS detection is available for 

enforcement purposes. Contact: Laura 

Nollen, (703) 305–7390; 

nollen.laura@epa.gov. 

3. PP 9E7642. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0890). The Interregional Research 

Project No. 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road 

East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540, 

in cooperation with Chemtura Corp., 

199 Benson Rd (2–5), Middlebury, CT 

06749, proposes to establish tolerances 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

insecticide bifenazate, (1-methylethyl 2- 

(4-methoxy[1,1’-biphenyl]-3- 

yl)hydrazinecarboxylate) and 

diazinecarboxylic acid, 2-(4-methoxy- 

[1,1’-biphenyl]-3-yl), 1-methylethyl ester 

(expressed as bifenazate), in or on sugar 

apple, cherimoya, atemoya, custard 

apple, ilama, soursop, and biriba at 1.5 

ppm; avocado at 7.0 ppm; fruit, small, 

vine climbing subgroup 13-07F, except 

fuzzy kiwi fruit at 0.75 ppm; and berry, 

low growing, subgroup 13-07G at 1.5 

ppm. Chemtura Corporation, has 

developed practical analytical 

methodology for detecting and 

measuring residues of bifenazate in or 

on raw agricultural commodities. As 

D3598, a significant metabolite, was 

found to interconvert readily to/from 

bifenazate, the analytical method was 

designed to convert all residues of 

D3598 to the parent compound 

(bifenazate) for analysis. The method, 

‘‘Determination of Combined Bifenazate 

and D3598 Residues in Sugar Apple’’, 

utilizes reversed phase high 

performance liquid chromatography 

(HPLC) to separate the bifenazate from 

matrix derived interferences, and 

oxidative coulometric electrochemical 

detection for the identification and 

quantification of this analyte. The 

lowest level of method validation 

(LLMV) in this study was 0.05 ppm for 

each analyte. Based on recoveries of 

samples fortified at the LLMV, the limit 

of detection (LOD) and limit of 

quantitation (LOQ) were calculated as 

0.0308 ppm and 0.0923 ppm, 

respectively, for bifenazate and as 

0.0332 ppm and 0.0997 ppm, 

respectively, for D3598. Contact: Sidney 

Jackson, (703) 305–7610; 

jackson.sidney@epa.gov. 

4. PP 9E7651. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0980). Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., 

P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419– 

8300, proposes to establish import 

tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for 

residues of the insecticide fluazifop-pbutyl, in or on potato, tuber at 1.1 ppm; 

potato, peel (wet) at 1.1 ppm; potato, 

chips at 3.0 ppm; and potato, granules/ 

flakes at 5.0 ppm. Syngenta has 

developed and validated analytical 

methodology for enforcement purposes. 

This method has been submitted to the 

Agency and is in the Pesticide 

Analytical Manual, Vol. II (PAM II). An 

extensive database of method validation 

data using this method on various crop 

commodities is available. Contact: 

Michael Walsh, (703) 308–2972; 

walsh.michael@epa.gov. 

5. PP 9F7568. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0481). Valent U.S.A. Company, 1600 

Riviera Ave., Walnut Creek, CA 94596– 

8025, proposes to establish tolerances in 

40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

fungicide 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide 

(BAM), in or on cattle, fat; cattle, meat 

byproducts; goat, fat; goat, meat 

byproducts; horse, fat; horse, meat 

byproducts; sheep, fat; and sheep, meat 

byproducts at 0.05 ppm; and cattle, 

meat; goat, meat; horse, meat; sheep, 

meat at 0.02 ppm, and milk at 0.02 ppm. 

A practical analytical method utilizing 

liquid chromatography and mass 

spectrometry detection that is validated 

for detecting and measuring levels of 

fluopicolide and BAM in animal 

matrices has been submitted. A 

confirmation method for milk, with a 

limit of quantitation of 0.002 ppm, has 

also been developed and is being 

submitted as part of this petition. 

Contact: Janet Whitehurst, (703) 305– 

6129; whitehurst.janet@epa.gov. 

6. PP 9F7590. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0873). BASF Corporation, P.O. Box 

13528, Research Triangle Park, NC 

27709, proposes to establish tolerances 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

fungicide pyraclostrobin, carbamic acid 

[2-[[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3- 

yl]oxy]methyl]phenyl]methoxy-, methyl 

ester and its metabolite methyl-N-[[[1- 

(4-chlorophenyl) pyrazol-3-yl]oxy]otolyl] carbamate (BF 500–3); expressed 

as parent compound, in or on soybean, 

forage at 11.0 ppm; and soybean, hay at 

14.0 ppm. In plants, the method of 

analysis is aqueous organic solvent 

extraction, column clean up and 

quantitation by LC-MS/MS. In animals, 

the method of analysis involves base 

hydrolysis, organic extraction, column 

clean up and quantitation by LC-MS/MS 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices 5793 

or derivatization (methylation) followed 

by quantitation by gas chromatography/ 

MS (GC/MS). Contact: Shaunta Hill, 

(703) 347–8961; hill.shaunta@epa.gov. 

7. PP 9F7617. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0481). Valent U.S.A. Company, 1600 

Riviera Ave., Walnut Creek, CA 94596– 

8025, proposes to establish a tolerance 

in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 

fungicide fluopicolide, 2,6-dichloro-N- 

[[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2- 

pyridyl]methyl]benzamide, as an 

indicator of combined residues of 

fluopicolide and its metabolite, 2,6- 

dichlorobenzamide (BAM), in or on 

vegetable, Brassica, leafy greens, 

subgroup 05B at 20 ppm. Practical 

analytical methods for detecting and 

measuring levels of fluopicolide and its 

metabolites have been developed and 

validated in/on all appropriate plant 

and animal matrices. An analytical 

method for detecting fluopicolide and 

BAM in mustard greens has been 

submitted with this petition. The LOQ 

of fluopicolide and the metabolite in the 

analytical method for mustard greens is 

10 parts per billion (ppb) (0.01 ppm), 

which will allow monitoring for 

residues at the levels proposed for the 

tolerances. Contact: Janet Whitehurst, 

(703) 305–6129; 

whitehurst.janet@epa.gov. 

8. PP 9F7620. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0836). Gowan Company, 370 S. Main 

Street, Yuma, AZ 85364, proposes to 

establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 

for residues of the herbicide S-ethyl 

dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC), in or on 

grasses grown for seed, hay at 0.1 ppm 

and grasses grown for seed, forage at 0.2 

ppm. Adequate methods are available 

for the determination of EPTC and three 

hydroxy metabolites in crops, including 

grass grown for seed. The EPA reviewed 

these methods and noted in the ‘‘1999 

EPTC Reregistration Eligibility Decision 

(RED)’’ that methods are available and 

adequate. The LOQ of the methods is 

0.05 ppm for EPTC and 0.01 ppm for 

each of the hydroxy metabolites. 

Contact: Bethany Benbow, (703) 347– 

8072; benbow.bethany@epa.gov. 

9. PP 9F7639. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0920). Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., 

P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, 

proposes to establish a tolerance in 40 

CFR part 180 for residues of the 

herbicide diquat dibromide, in or on 

canola, seed at 1.0 ppm; and canola, 

meal at 3.0 ppm. An adequate analytical 

method, extraction with sulfuric acid 

with HPLC detection, is available for 

enforcement purposes. Analytical 

methods for enforcing these tolerances 

have been published in the PAM II. 

Contact: Bethany Benbow, (703) 347– 

8072; benbow.bethany@epa.gov. 

Amended Tolerances 

1. PP 9E7632. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0861). The Interregional Research 

Project No. 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road 

East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540, 

proposes to amend the tolerances in 40 

CFR 180.608 by revising the tolerance 

expression under paragraphs (a)(1) and 

(a)(2) to read as follows: (a)(1). 

Tolerances are established for residues 

of the insecticide spirodiclofen, 

including its metabolites and 

degradates. Compliance with the 

tolerance levels specified is to be 

determined by measuring only 

spirodiclofen (3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2- 

oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl 2,2- 

dimethylbutanoate). (a)(2). Tolerances 

are established for residues of the 

insecticide spirodiclofen, including its 

metabolites and degradates. Compliance 

with the tolerance levels specified is to 

be determined by measuring only the 

sum of spirodiclofen (3-(2,4- 

dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1- 

oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl 2,2- 

dimethylbutanoate) and its metabolite 3- 

(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-hydroxy-1- 

oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-2-one, calculated 

as the stoichiometric equivalent of 

spirodiclofen. Adequate analytical 

methodology using LC-MS/MS 

detection is available for enforcement 

purposes. Contact: Laura Nollen, (703) 

305–7390; nollen.laura@epa.gov. 

2. PP 9F7576. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0673). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr., 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 

proposes to increase the tolerance in 40 

CFR 180.361 for residues of the 

herbicide pendimethalin, N-(1- 

ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6- 

dinitrobenzenamine, and its metabolite 

4-[(1-ethylpropyl)amino]-2-methyl-3,5- 

dinitrobenzyl alcohol, in or on alfalfa, 

forage from 3.0 ppm to 3.5 ppm. In 

plants, the method is aqueous organic 

solvent extraction, column clean up, 

and quantitation by GC. The method has 

a LOQ of 0.05 ppm for pendimethalin 

and the alcohol metabolite. Contact: 

Philip Errico, (703) 305–6663; 

errico.philip@epa.gov. 

New Tolerance Exemptions 

1. PP 9E7627. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0046). Joint Inerts Task Force, Cluster 

Support Team 25, EPA Company 

Number 84866, c/o CropLife America, 

1156 15th St., NW, Suite 400, 

Washington, DC 20005, proposes to 

establish an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of N-alkyl (C8-C18) primary amines and 

acetate salts (NAPAAS) under 40 CFR 

180.910 and 180.930 when used as inert 

ingredients in pesticide formulations, 

limited to a maximum of 10% by weight 

in herbicide products, and 4% by 

weight in other pesticidal products for 

the following N-alkyl (C8-C18) primary 

amines and acetate salts where the alkyl 

group is linear and may be saturated 

and or unsaturated including: The Nalkyl (C8-C18) primary amines acetate 

salts: amines, coco alkyl, acetates 

(61790–57–6); amines, soya alkyl, 

acetates (61790–60–1); amines, 

hydrogenated tallow alkyl, acetates 

(61790–59–8); and amines, tallow alkyl, 

acetates (61790–58–7); and the 

following N-alkyl (C8-C18) primary 

amines: amines, coco alkyl (61788–46– 

3); amines, coco alkyl (61790–33–8); 

and amines, C14-18 and C16-18

unsaturated alkyl (68155–38–4). The 

petitioner believes no analytical method 

is needed because requirements for an 

analytical method are not applicable to 

a request to establish an exemption from 

the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: 

Karen Samek, (703) 347–8825; 

samek.karen@epa.gov. 

2. PP 9E7628. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0131). Joint Inerts Task Force, Cluster 

Support Team 2, EPA Company Number 

84914, c/o CropLife America, 1156 15th 

St., NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 

20005, proposes to establish an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of alkyl alcohol 

alkoxylate phosphate derivatives 

(AAAPD) under 40 CFR 180.910 and 

180.930 when used as inert ingredients 

in pesticide formulations, limited to a 

maximum of 30% by weight in end-use 

products for the a-alkyl (minimum C6

linear or branched, saturated and or 

unsaturated)-w-hydroxypolyoxyethylene 

polymer with or without 

polyoxypropylene, mixture of di- and 

monohydrogen phosphate esters and the 

corresponding ammonium, calcium, 

magnesium, monoethanolamine, 

potassium, sodium and zinc salts of the 

phosphate esters; minimum oxyethylene 

content averages 2 moles; minimum 

oxypropylene content is 0 moles, 

including: Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), atridecyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate (9046– 

01–9); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), adodecyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate (39464– 

66–9); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), ahexadecyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate 

(50643–20–4); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), 

a-decyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate (52019– 

36–0); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), ahydro-w-hydroxy-, mono-C12-15-alkyl 

ethers, phosphates (69071–35–2); 

Polyphosphoric acids, esters with 

polyethylene glycol decyl ether (68458– 

48–0); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), ahydro-w-hydroxy-, mono-C10-14-alkyl 

ethers, phosphates (68585–36–4); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-whydroxy-, mono-C12-15-branched alkyl 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
5794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices 

ethers, phosphates (68815–11–2); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-whydroxy-, mono-C10-12-alkyl ethers, 

phosphates (68908–64–5); Poly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl), a-hydro-w-hydroxy-, monoC12-14-alkyl ethers, phosphates (68511– 

37–5); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), ahydro-w-hydroxy-, mono-C8-10-alkyl 

ethers, phosphates (68130–47–2); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-dodecyl-whydroxy-, phosphate, sodium salt 

(42612–52–2); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), 

a-dodecyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate, 

potassium salt (58318–92–6); Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-hexadecyl-w-hydroxy- 

, phosphate, potassium salt (60267–55– 

2); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-decyl-whydroxy-, phosphate, potassium salt 

(68070–99–5); Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), 

a-tridecyl-w-hydroxy-, phosphate, 

potassium salt (68186–36–7); Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-decyl-w-hydroxy-, 

phosphate, sodium salt (68186–37–8); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-whydroxy-, mono-C12-15-alkyl ethers, 

phosphates, sodium salts (68610–65–1); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-isodecyl-whydroxy-, phosphate, potassium salt 

(68071–17–0); (branched C10) Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-phosphono-w-[(2- 

propylheptyl)oxy]-, potassium salt (1:2) 

(936100–29–7); (branched C10) 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-phosphonow-[(2-propylheptyl)oxy]-, sodium salt 

(1:2) (936100–30–0); Poly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl), a-isotridecyl-w-hydroxy-, 

phosphate (73038–25–2); Poly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl), a-hydro-w-hydroxy-, monoC11-14-isoalkyl ethers, C13-rich, 

phosphates (78330–24–-2); Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-w-hydroxy-, 

mono(C10-rich C9-11-isoalkyl) ethers, 

phosphates (154518–39–5); Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-w-hydroxy-, 

mono-C12-14-sec-alkyl ethers, 

phosphates (317833–96–8); Poly(oxy1,2-ethanediyl), a-isodecyl-w-hydroxy-, 

phosphate (108818–88–8); Poly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl), a-phosphono-w-[(2- 

propylheptyl)oxy] (873662–29–4); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-dodecyl-whydroxy-, phosphate, 

monoethanolamine salt (61837–79–4); 

Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-tridecyl-whydroxy-, phosphate monoethanolamine 

salt (68311–02–4); Poly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl), a-decyl-w-hydroxy-, 

phosphate, monoethanolamine salt 

(68425–73–0); Oxirane, methyl-, 

polymer with oxirane, phosphate 

(37280–82–3); Oxirane, methyl-, 

polymer with oxirane, mono-C10-16-alkyl 

ethers, phosphates (68649–29–6); 

Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, 

phosphate, potassium salt (67711–84– 

6); and Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with 

oxirane, mono-C10-16-alkyl ethers, 

phosphates, potassium salt (68891–13– 

4). The petitioner believes no analytical 

method is needed because requirements 

for an analytical method are not 

applicable to a request to establish an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance. Contact: Karen Samek, (703) 

347–8825; samek.karen@epa.gov. 

3. PP 9E7638. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0937). Cognis Corporation, c/o Lewis & 

Harrison, LLC, 122 C Street NW, Suite 

740, Washington, DC 20001, proposes to 

establish an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance for residues 

of the alkyl polyglycosides (CAS Nos. 

68515–73–1, 110615–47–9, and 132778– 

08–6) under 40 CFR 180.950 when used 

as inert ingredients in pesticide 

formulations. The petitioner believes no 

analytical method is needed because 

requirements for an analytical method 

are not applicable to a request to 

establish an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance. Contact: 

Karen Samek, (703) 347–8825; 

samek.karen@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

Agricultural commodities, Feed 

additives, Food additives, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 27, 2010. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2382 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information Collection 

Being Reviewed by the Federal 

Communications Commission for 

Extension Under Delegated Authority, 

Comments Requested 

January 29, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology and (e) ways to 

further reduce the information burden 

for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on 

this information collection should 

submit comments by April 5, 2010. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), via fax 

at (202) 395–5167, or via e–mail at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Cathy Williams, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC), via 

e–mail at PRA@fcc.gov and to 

Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection send an e–mail to 

PRA@fcc.gov or contact Cathy Williams 

on (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1053. 

Title: 47 CFR 64.604 – 

Telecommunications Relay Services and 

Speech–to–Speech Services for 

Individuals with Hearing and Speech 

Disabilities; IP Captioned Telephone 

Service, Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket 

No. 03–123. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 7 respondents and 14 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 8 

hours. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES