alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11123

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR LUIS MATA-RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-103-ALL-M

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Oscar Luis Mata-Ramos appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MataRamos complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. 

Mata-Ramos thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the

maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 
No. 03-11123

-2-

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Mata-Ramos acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### § 75.681 Protection of human research subjects.

If a grantee uses a human subject in a research project, the grantee shall protect the person from physical, psychological, or social injury resulting from the project.

(Authority: [20 U.S.C. 1221e-3](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/20/1221e-3) and [3474](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/20/3474))

Cross Reference:

See [34 CFR part 97](/on/2024-08-29/title-34/part-97)—Protection of Human Subjects.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 655

 644

 579

 589

 573

 592

 634

 646

 661

 648

 644

 624

 617

 636

 640

 621

 644

 663

 646

 623

 638

 659

 651

 625

 632

 657

 638

 618

 615

 604

 467

 469

 461

 482

 463

 441

 454

 504

 497

 461

 473

 455

 465

 481

 506

 511

 549

 527

 506

 521

 528

 524

 513

 521

 534

 540

 535

 514

 502

 487

 546

 552

 535

 538

 535

 530

 534

 536

 534

 520

 516

 514

 517

 525

 547

 550

 581

 581

 575

 571

 579

 580

 566

 561

 568

 579

 572

 549

 528

 521

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:October 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 353

 357

 347

 348

 347

 344

 346

 347

 346

 337

 335

 334

 336

 340

 354

 356

 375

 375

 371

 369

 374

 374

 366

 363

 367

 374

 369

 355

 342

 338

TOTAL 16,440

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 815

 831

 826

 826

 798

 773

 699

 744

 732

 842

 865

 869

 822

 834

 976

 843

 896

 766

 874

 888

 945

 880

 838

 817

 755

 790

 772

 791

 782

 783

 765

 763

 765

 787

 798

 769

 697

 620

 671

 690

 686

 717

 706

 707

 750

 746

 743

 764

 745

 757

 741

 743

 714

 721

 750

 733

 743

 749

 744

 710

 722

 658

 781

 804

 811

 815

 782

 735

 654

 703

 712

 734

 769

 772

 735

 791

 817

 783

 835

 755

 813

 796

 842

 765

 782

 780

 746

 768

 763

 762

 753

 748

 689

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 499

 513

 517

 520

 499

 470

 420

 450

 456

 470

 491

 493

 470

 505

 521

 500

 532

 483

 518

 508

 536

 489

 499

 498

 477

 491

 488

 487

 481

 478

 442

TOTAL 23,795

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Filed by EBS Inc. (403) 275-3442










October 22, 2007





TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:



Attached to this filing, in PDF format, are the following documents:

1.

Exhibit 4.24.

Yours very truly,

CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP.



[signed]



Julie Bolden

VP Corporate Affairs

/jlb

Encl.






			
	 	 	 
	Targeting Uranium and Gold 

	Trading Symbol: CXX

	Website: www.crosshairexploration.com 


	Head Office: Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street

	Telephone: 604-681-8030

	Investor email: dan@crosshairexploration.com


	Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4G1

	Toll Free: 1-866-683-8030

Facsimile: 604-681-8039

	General email: michele@crosshairexploration.com
EXHIBIT 32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) by China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc.(the Registrant), I, Steven Jiao, hereby certify that:  1.  To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated: April 17, 2007  By:  /s/ Steven Jiao Steven Jiao
Chief Financial Officer
### Part A—Interagency Labor Committee for Monitoring and Enforcement
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Morgan Stanley Group Inc. of our report dated January 4, 1996, included in
the 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Morgan Stanley Group Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Morgan Stanley
Group Inc. listed in item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-58611, Form S-3 No. 33-57833, Form S-3 No. 33-51067, Form S-3
No. 33-51413, Form S-8 No. 33-13177, Form S-8 No. 33-37652, Form S-8 No.
33-18184, and Form S-8 No. 33-42464) of Morgan Stanley Group Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated January 4, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Morgan Stanley Group Inc.
included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended November 30, 1995.


                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
February 23, 1996
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas G. Gregg, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paramco Financial Group, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



Date:  May
24, 2004.





By:   /s/ Douglas G. Gregg
Douglas G. Gregg

Acting
Chief Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 49—FUGITIVES FROM JUSTICE**

Sec.
1071.
Concealing person from arrest.
1072.
Concealing escaped prisoner.
1073.
Flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony.
1074.
Flight to avoid prosecution for damaging or destroying any building or other real or personal property.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–449, title II, §202, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 87, added item 1074.
§ 75.564 Reimbursement of indirect costs. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70331 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Reimbursement of indirect costs is subject to the availability of funds and statutory or administrative restrictions.
( b ) The application of the rates and the determination of the direct cost base by a grantee must be in accordance with the indirect cost rate agreement approved by the grantee's cognizant agency.
( c ) Indirect cost reimbursement is not allowable under grants for— ( 1 ) Fellowships and similar awards if Federal financing is exclusively in the form of fixed amounts such as scholarships, stipend allowances, or the tuition and fees of an institution;
( 2 ) Construction grants;
( 3 ) Grants to individuals;
( 4 ) Grants to organizations located outside the territorial limits of the United States;
( 5 ) Grants to Federal organizations; and
( 6 ) Grants made exclusively to support conferences.
( d ) Indirect cost reimbursement on grants received under programs with statutory restrictions or other limitations on indirect costs must be made in accordance with the restrictions in 34 CFR 76.564 through 76.569.
( e ) ( 1 ) Indirect costs for a group of eligible parties (See §§ 75.127 through 75.129) are limited to the amount derived by applying the rate of the applicant, or a restricted rate when applicable, to the direct cost base for the grant in keeping with the terms of the applicant's federally recognized indirect cost rate agreement.
( 2 ) If a group of eligible parties applies for a training grant under the group application procedures in §§ 75.127 through 75.129, the grant funds allocated among the members of the group are not considered sub-awards for the purposes of applying the indirect cost rate in § 75.562(c).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[59 FR 59583, Nov. 17, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 69148, Dec. 7, 2007]
The DJI User Manuals were too large to download over the docket portal. DJI is the prominent

manufacturer of UAS with their lineup of the Inspire 1, Phantom 3, and Matrice 100 UAS systems. Manuals for all these products can be found here... http://www.dji.com/support
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division 

In re: )

)

BARBARA J. POPPE-KARNES, ) Case No. 20-10099-BFK

) Chapter 13 

) 

Debtor. ) 

_______________________________________ ) 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

On February 6, 2020, the Court held a hearing on its Order for the Debtor to Appear and

Show Cause why the Case Should not be Dismissed with Prejudice. Docket No. 5. The Debtor, 

Brian Madden, counsel for the Debtor, and Thomas Gorman, the Chapter 13 Trustee, were 

present at the hearing. For the reasons stated on the record, it is 

ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice to re-filing under any chapter of the Bankruptcy

Code in this or any other court for a period of one year from the entry of this Order. 

2. The Clerk will mail a copy of this order, or give electronic notice of its entry, to the

parties listed below.

Date: _____________________ ________________________________

Brian F. Kenney

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies to: 

Barbara J. Poppe-Karnes

5501 Merchants View Sq., #806 

Haymarket, VA 20169 

Debtor 

Brian Kenneth Madden

Brian K. Madden, P.C. 

PO Box 7663 

Arlington, VA 22207 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 N. Washington St. Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Chapter 7 Trustee

Feb 7 2020 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: February 7, 2020

Case 20-10099-BFK Doc 22 Filed 02/07/20 Entered 02/07/20 12:13:07 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
### §3055. Officers' powers to suppress Indian liquor traffic

The chief special officer for the suppression of the liquor traffic among Indians and duly authorized officers working under his supervision whose appointments are made or affirmed by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs or the Secretary of the Interior may execute all warrants of arrest and other lawful precepts issued under the authority of the United States and in the execution of his duty he may command all necessary assistance.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 817.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 250 of title 25, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Indians (Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 388, §1, 37 Stat. 519).

The only change was to delete the words at the beginning of the section, "The powers conferred by section 504 of title 28 upon marshals and their deputies are conferred upon." and the addition, at the end of the section, of the phrase expressing such powers beginning with the words "may execute all warrants".
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 18, 2019

t0911 

# Order

Clerk September 18, 2019

159448

ZAID SAFDAR,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159448

COA: 344030

Oakland CC: 2016

- 839363

- DM

DONYA AZIZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2019

judgment o f the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spare Backup, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I, Cery B.
Perle, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 21, 2007
      ------------

                                                 /s/ Cery B. Perle
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                                   Cery B. Perle
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal financial and accounting officer)


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Spare Backup, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

December-04

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,482 4,339 9,821 10,873 8,606 19,479 2-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,639 4,317 7,956 7,218 8,562 15,780 3-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,080 4,354 8,434 8,092 8,637 16,729 4-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,950 4,312 8,262 7,835 8,552 16,387 5-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,813 4,232 8,045 7,563 8,394 15,957 6-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,960 4,143 6,103 3,888 8,218 12,106 7-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,357 1,650 6,008 8,643 3,273 11,916 8-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,733 1,654 6,387 9,388 3,281 12,669 9-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,290 1,658 5,948 8,509 3,289 11,798 

10-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,270 1,665 5,935 8,469 3,303 11,772 11-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,564 3,473 5,037 3,102 6,888 9,990 12-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,861 4,197 6,058 3,692 8,325 12,017 13-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,791 4,210 6,001 3,552 8,351 11,903 14-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,803 4,213 6,016 3,577 8,356 11,933 

15-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,814 4,190 6,004 3,598 8,311 11,909 

16-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 5,691 4,346 10,038 11,289 8,621 19,910 17-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,299 4,372 10,671 12,494 8,671 21,165 18-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,815 4,341 11,157 13,518 8,611 22,129 19-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,333 4,307 10,639 12,561 8,542 21,103 20-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,534 4,329 9,863 10,977 8,586 19,563 21-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,932 4,346 10,278 11,767 8,620 20,387 22-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,115 4,348 9,463 10,146 8,624 18,770 23-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,813 4,350 9,163 9,546 8,628 18,174 24-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,368 4,126 8,494 8,664 8,183 16,847 25-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,360 3,708 8,068 8,649 7,354 16,003 26-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,066 3,719 7,785 8,065 7,377 15,442 27-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,801 3,605 7,406 7,540 7,150 14,690 28-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,839 3,500 7,339 7,615 6,942 14,557 29-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,388 3,655 8,042 8,703 7,249 15,952 

30-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 1 4,939 3,737 8,676 9,796 7,413 17,209 31-Dec-04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7,115 4,207 11,322 14,112 8,345 22,457 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 15 0 15 XXXX 132,816 117,601 250,417 263,441 233,262 496,703 XX

Delta Smelt Incidental Take LevelsBelow Normal Water Year TypeDelta smelt risk assessment matrix (DSRM) Adult level of concern = 892Re-consultation level for December = 400

S

D

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 547

 534

 546

 540

 525

 506

 506

 530

 533

 517

 527

 524

 536

 564

 583

 611

 633

 652

 659

 671

 682

 694

 728

 755

 774

 779

 801

 777

 792

 785

 317

 331

 362

 393

 397

 336

 297

 349

 406

 432

 463

 487

 500

 506

 509

 509

 508

 507

 501

 499

 483

 495

 517

 509

 495

 531

 535

 526

 537

 497

 482

 482

 477

 493

 469

 445

 403

 444

 466

 480

 496

 504

 516

 530

 536

 547

 556

 573

 580

 585

 586

 591

 610

 608

 612

 640

 628

 621

 615

 612

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 314

 314

 311

 321

 306

 291

 265

 290

 304

 313

 323

 327

 335

 344

 347

 354

 360

 370

 374

 378

 378

 381

 393

 392

 394

 412

 404

 400

 396

 394

TOTAL 16,187

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5075 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5075

 To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, to repeal certain 
    limits on leave for a married individuals employed by the same 
                               employer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2019

 Ms. Porter (for herself, Mr. King of New York, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Levin 
 of Michigan, Mr. Katko, and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and 
   in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Reform, and House 
   Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, to repeal certain 
    limits on leave for a married individuals employed by the same 
                               employer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access for Individuals to 
Receive Leave Act'' or the ``FAIR Leave Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS ON LEAVE FOR SPOUSES.

    Section 102(f) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 
U.S.C. 2612(f)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```