alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Boschert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT              
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 19, 2009            





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 31.1

                                                        CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul S. Summers, certify that:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 991

 991

 997

 1,015

 933

 970

 970

 932

 941

 855

 826

 796

 814

 769

 354

 564

 619

 619

 684

 667

 620

 593

 550

 472

 414

 435

 431

 425

 474

 482

 285

 279

 291

 292

 286

 283

 287

 278

 272

 277

 270

 271

 269

 270

 264

 301

 299

 302

 306

 308

 315

 316

 325

 318

 308

 317

 313

 314

 324

 327

 566

 513

 522

 542

 518

 620

 644

 562

 587

 509

 489

 453

 444

 416

 275

 434

 402

 396

 421

 424

 405

 406

 411

 361

 341

 360

 355

 355

 372

 370

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 8, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 366

 333

 339

 351

 336

 399

 414

 363

 379

 331

 318

 296

 290

 273

 186

 284

 264

 261

 276

 278

 266

 267

 270

 239

 227

 238

 235

 235

 246

 245

TOTAL 13,473

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Order entered December 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01406-CV

IN RE CRITTER CONTROL, INC. AND KEVIN CLARK, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05281

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 3,841 441 1,590 27,703 1,979

2 3,402 490 1,557 27,813 1,987

3 3,589 519 1,578 28,152 2,011

4 4,398 632 1,656 28,436 2,031

5 5,544 584 1,893 28,859 2,061

6 5,475 579 2,049 29,236 2,088

7 6,071 511 2,301 29,474 2,105

8 6,235 555 2,615 29,707 2,122

9 6,197 573 2,843 30,048 2,146

10 6,387 520 2,863 30,373 2,170

11 6,751 535 2,835 30,795 2,200

12 6,269 620 2,842 31,300 2,236

13 5,853 665 2,625 31,263 2,233

14 5,136 756 2,538 31,785 2,270

15 4,746 815 2,454 32,649 2,332

16 5,015 939 2,496 33,588 2,399

17 5,437 907 2,555 34,565 2,469

18 6,059 949 2,583 35,492 2,535

19 6,574 746 2,803 36,402 2,600

20 6,372 673 3,183 37,536 2,681

21 6,701 900 3,602 38,837 2,774

22 7,196 740 3,338 39,560 2,826

23 6,647 458 3,094 39,811 2,844

24 7,020 914 3,514 40,462 2,890

25 6,896 712 3,525 41,152 2,939

26 7,035 851 3,364 41,674 2,977

27 6,695 791 3,482 42,531 3,038

28 6,581 921 3,541 43,534 3,110

29 6,605 955 3,177 44,257 3,161

30 5,918 813 3,010 44,771 3,198

31 5,420 873 2,661 44,877 3,206

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: August 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 193

 191

 203

 193

 190

 185

 199

 185

 178

 164

 166

 134

 96

 92

 89

 84

 72

 82

 71

 73

 67

 63

 60

 59

 66

 65

 62

 67

 84

 157

 150

 149

 130

 85

 169

 169

 180

 179

 151

 153

 66

 60

 74

 67

 71

 63

 61

 58

 59

 61

 55

 58

 51

 51

 56

 57

 54

 51

 64

 168

 169

 166

 173

 142

 177

 175

 187

 183

 173

 160

 147

 87

 82

 74

 78

 72

 67

 66

 64

 68

 61

 59

 56

 55

 59

 61

 58

 60

 71

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 7, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 120

 120

 119

 123

 104

 125

 124

 132

 129

 123

 115

 107

 70

 67

 62

 64

 60

 57

 57

 56

 58

 54

 52

 51

 50

 52

 54

 52

 53

 60

TOTAL 3,218

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 543

 545

 539

 566

 533

 515

 525

 544

 553

 541

 536

 510

 479

 456

 441

 421

 406

 500

 549

 575

 563

 546

 542

 529

 546

 551

 550

 558

 560

 561

 550

 402

 396

 406

 455

 445

 432

 430

 458

 442

 455

 465

 440

 408

 414

 396

 388

 382

 399

 489

 490

 468

 494

 437

 370

 355

 379

 376

 372

 347

 327

 312

 469

 472

 483

 501

 486

 474

 479

 502

 502

 509

 510

 482

 448

 436

 418

 403

 396

 438

 527

 538

 531

 525

 503

 468

 477

 492

 486

 493

 477

 475

 473

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:November 13, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 306

 308

 314

 326

 316

 309

 312

 326

 326

 331

 331

 314

 293

 285

 274

 265

 261

 287

 342

 348

 344

 340

 327

 305

 311

 320

 316

 321

 311

 310

 308

TOTAL 14,873

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
(No. 00032

#### Judy Lackey, as wife of Peter E. Lackey, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 26, 1973.*

Judy Lackey, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*414Per Curiam.

This claim was filed pursuant to *Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971,*“Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”. The Court is in receipt of the Application for Benefits and Statement of Supervising Officer, as well as an investigative report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office. Based upon these documents the Court finds as follows:

That the claimant, Judy Lackey, is the wife of the decedent and is the named beneficiary under the Application for Benefits. That the decedent, Peter E. Lackey, was a special agent investigator employed by the State of Illinois Bureau of Investigation engaged in the scope of duty on November 27, 1972, within the meaning of Section 282 of the aforecited act. On said date he suffered several stab wounds in his body and a slashing of his throat by a sharp instrument while enroute from his home to the Springfield office of the IBI, where he was to meet a fellow officer upon assignment to Quincy, Illinois. Agent Lackey died at approximately 7:30 a.m. on November 27, 1972, as a result of “Exsanguinating hemorrhage due to or as a consequence of severance of both superficial jugular veins, both common carotid arteries, left int. jugular due or as a consequence of slashing of throat by sharp instrument”. The Court further finds that the Attorney General’s office in its investigation has determined that this claim is within the scope of the above cited statutes:

> “Section 282 (e) ‘killed in the line of duty’ means losing one’s life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer or fireman if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause . .

A subsequent investigation by police led to the arrest of one Barron Dean Fonner who had been previously arrested by the decedent for narcotic violations. Fonner is presently incarcerated in the Sangamon County Jail awaiting trial.

*415IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sum of $10,000 (TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS) be, and the same hereby is, granted to Judy Lackey, as wife and next of kin of the decedent, Peter E. Lackey.
#### Irene Kissley, Respondent, v. The Ulster and Delaware Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 25, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10105 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HENRY GENE LAFFOON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-128-ALL-A

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Henry Gene Laffoon appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for one count of aiding and abetting bank robbery and two counts of possession of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. The district court sentenced Laffoon to 71 months of imprisonment on the bank-robbery conviction and to the statutory minimum sentence of 384 months (32 years) of imprisonment on the firearms convictions. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i), 2113(a).No. 05-10105 -2- Laffoon argues that the mandatory minimum sentences imposed on his firearms convictions violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment because they fail to take into account his mental retardation. Citing Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304 (2002), which held that the Eighth Amendment protects against the execution of mentally retarded defendants, he argues that the Supreme Court has recognized that persons with reduced mental capabilities do not act with the same level of moral culpability as other offenders. He argues that the mandatory minimums set forth in § 924(c) are unconstitutional because they fail to account for the lesser culpability of the mentally retarded. He makes no other challenge to his sentence. We review the constitutionality of a federal statute de novo . United States v. Rasco , 123 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 1997). With the exception of a capital sentence, the imposition of a mandatory sentence without consideration of mitigating factors does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Harmelin v. Michigan , 501 U.S. 957, 994- 95 (1991). As the Supreme Court has continually recognized a distinction between capital and noncapital sentences, see Harmelin , 501 U.S. at 995, Laffoon’s reliance on Atkins to extend its rationale to noncapital cases is unavailing. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §674b. White Horse Hill National Game Preserve; acquisition of additional lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire, by purchase or otherwise, after July 1, 1932, an area of land not to exceed three thousand acres, at an average cost of not more than $10 per acre, with the improvements thereon, situated on the east and south of said preserve as described in section 674a of this title, within sections 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, and 24, township 152 north, range 65 west, fifth principal meridian, said lands, upon acquisition by the United States, to become a part of the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.

(Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 439, §2, 46 Stat. 1509; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title IV, §402(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3191.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–94 substituted "White Horse Hill National Game Preserve" for "Sullys Hill National Game Preserve" in text.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5029 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to staff each medical center 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs with at least one suicide prevention coordinator, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Mr. WATKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to staff each 

medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

with at least one suicide prevention coordinator, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Suicide Prevention 

5 Services Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5029 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATORS AT MEDICAL 

2 CENTERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET3 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

5 shall ensure that each medical center of the Department 

6 of Veterans Affairs is staffed with not fewer than one full7 time employee whose primary job responsibility is serving 

8 as a suicide prevention coordinator. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

10 (1) MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIAN.—The term 

11 ‘‘mental health clinician’’ means a psychologist, so12 cial worker, marriage and family therapist, or li13 censed professional mental health counselor hired 

14 under section 7401(3) of title 38, United States 

15 Code, or a nurse hired under section 7401(1) of 

16 such title. 

17 (2) SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATOR.—The 

18 term ‘‘suicide prevention coordinator’’ means a men19 tal health clinician who is responsible for— 

20 (A) coordinating local suicide prevention 

21 strategies and activities, including those sup22 porting the identification of veterans at a high 

23 risk of suicide; 

24 (B) coordination of enhanced care for vet25 erans identified as being at a high risk of sui26 cide; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5029 IH

1 (C) suicide prevention education and out2 reach to stakeholders, including health care pro3 viders, veterans, caregivers, families, and mem4 bers of the community. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 656.7 What definitions apply? The following definitions apply to this part: ( a ) The definitions in 34 CFR part 655.
( b ) *Area studies* means a program of comprehensive study of the aspects of a world area's society or societies, including study of history, culture, economy, politics, international relations, and languages.
( c ) *Center* means an administrative unit of an institution of higher education that has direct access to highly qualified faculty and library resources, and coordinates a concentrated effort of educational resources, including language training and various academic disciplines, in the area and subject matters described in § 656.3.
( d ) *Comprehensive Center* means a Center that— ( 1 ) Contributes significantly to the national interest in advanced research and scholarship;
( 2 ) Offers intensive language instruction;
( 3 ) Maintains important library collections related to the area of its specialization;
( 4 ) Makes training available to a graduate, professional, and undergraduate clientele; and
( 5 ) Engages in curriculum development and community outreach.
( e ) For purposes of this section, *intensive language instruction* means instruction of at least five contact hours per week during the academic year or the equivalent of a full academic year of language instruction during the summer.
( f ) *Undergraduate Center* means an administrative unit of an institution of higher education that— ( 1 ) Contributes significantly to the national interest through the education of students who matriculate into advanced language and area studies programs or professional school programs;
( 2 ) Incorporates substantial international and foreign language content into baccalaureate degree program;
( 3 ) Makes training available predominantly to undergraduate students; and
( 4 ) Engages in research, curriculum development, and community outreach.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
#### § 101.33 Filing and service.

All notices by a Department official, and all written motions, requests, petitions, memoranda, pleadings, exceptions, briefs, decisions, and correspondence to a Department official from a party, or vice versa, relating to a proceeding after its commencement shall be filed and served on all parties. Parties shall supply the original and two copies of documents submitted for filing. Filings shall be made with the Civil Rights hearing clerk at the address stated in the notice of hearing or notice of opportunity for hearing, during regular business hours. Regular business hours are every Monday through Friday (legal holidays in the District of Columbia excepted) from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., eastern standard or daylight saving time, whichever is effective in the District of Columbia at the time. Originals only on exhibits and transcripts of testimony need be filed. For requirements of service on amici curiae, see § 101.107.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00074

- CV

IN RE WILLIAM R. NORTON

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Lasagna Vaughn sued William R. Norton for damages resulting from personal injuries allegedly received in an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for Vaughn and awarded damages of $21,886.00 in past physical pain and mental anguish, $23,114.00 in past medical expenses, and zero for all other elements of damage submitted to the jury. Vaughn filed a motion for new trial. On June 25, 2019, the trial court granted Vaughn’s motion for new trial, stating only that the verdict was against the great weight and preponderance of evidence presented at trial. The order did not explain the basis of the trial court’s conclusion that the verdict was against the great weight and prepon derance of the evidence. Norton filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court, seeking to vacate the trial court’s June 25, 2019, order granting Vaughn’s motion for new trial. After Norton filed his petition for writ of mandamus, the trial court e ntered an amended order on August 21, 2019, that specifically detailed the court’s reasons for granting a new trial. Because Norton complained of the June 25, 2019, order and that order is now moot, we deny the requested relief. See In re Smith , No. 06

- 1 0

- 00116

- CV , 2010 WL 4679853 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Nov. 18, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)

.

Ralph K. Burgess Justice Date Submitted: August 28 , 2019 Date Decided: August 29 , 2019
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    08-235              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	FaArRuUkKhH AsSlLaAmM	   APPELLANT	

	V.

ToOuUcChHsStToOnNeE CoOmMmMuUnNiIcCaAtTiIoOnNsS-II, LLC OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

 TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE 96TH          PROBATE DISTRICT COURT  NO. 2 OF TARRANT                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s [s’]’ “uNOPPOSEDUnopposed Motion To Dismiss aInterlocutory AppealNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by  the appellants [ [s][- [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D:     CAYCE, C.J.;  LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  November 1420, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 383

 390

 384

 377

 400

 407

 395

 405

 387

 395

 413

 420

 479

 531

 550

 588

 644

 697

 672

 626

 697

 723

 654

 682

 635

 637

 624

 670

 648

 639

 262

 225

 214

 237

 291

 316

 323

 319

 343

 328

 345

 319

 386

 399

 399

 422

 438

 451

 463

 469

 476

 444

 430

 435

 453

 445

 434

 434

 420

 410

 339

 329

 328

 328

 352

 360

 361

 358

 364

 357

 378

 380

 430

 454

 461

 482

 507

 532

 530

 520

 552

 558

 535

 571

 554

 537

 521

 524

 501

 488

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 6, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 226

 219

 219

 219

 234

 238

 239

 237

 241

 237

 250

 251

 282

 297

 301

 314

 329

 345

 344

 337

 357

 361

 347

 369

 358

 348

 338

 340

 326

 318

TOTAL 13,491

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS