alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1453. Lading and unlading of merchandise or baggage; penalties

If any merchandise or baggage is laden on, or unladen from, any vessel or vehicle without a special license or permit therefor issued by the appropriate customs officer, the master of such vessel or the person in charge of such vehicle and every other person who knowingly is concerned, or who aids therein, or in removing or otherwise securing such merchandise or baggage, shall each be liable to a penalty equal to the value of the merchandise or baggage so laden or unladen, and such merchandise or baggage shall be subject to forfeiture, and if the value thereof is $500 or more, the vessel or vehicle on or from which the same shall be laden or unladen shall be subject to forfeiture.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §453, 46 Stat. 716; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §453, 42 Stat. 955. That section was superseded by section 453 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Provisions imposing penalties and forfeitures for violation of R.S. §2872, which required a special license for unloading or delivering merchandise otherwise than in open day, were contained in R.S. §§2873 and 2874, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §642, 42 Stat. 989.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to appropriate customs officer for reference to collector.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
§ 75.101 Information in the application notice that helps an applicant apply. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70320 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary may include such information as the following in an application notice: ( 1 ) How an applicant can get an application package that contains: ( i ) Information about the program; and
( ii ) The application form that the applicant must use.
( 2 ) The amount of funds available for grants, the estimated number of those grants, the estimated amounts of those grants and, if appropriate, the maximum award amounts of those grants.
( 3 ) If the Secretary plans to approve multi-year projects, the project period that will be approved.
( 4 ) Any priorities established by the Secretary for the program for that year and the method the Secretary will use to implement the priorities. (See § 75.105 *Annual priorities.*)
( 5 ) Where to find the regulations that apply to the program.
( 6 ) The statutory authority for the program.
( 7 ) The deadlines established under § 75.102 (Deadline date for applications.) and 34 CFR 79.8 (How does the Secretary provide States an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance?)
( b ) If the Secretary either requires or permits preapplications under a program, an application notice for the program explains how an applicant can get the preapplication form. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)


Cross Reference:
See 34 CFR 77.1—definitions of “budget period” and “project period.” [45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 84059, Dec. 22, 1980; 46 FR 3205, Jan. 14, 1981; 51 FR 20824, June 9, 1986; 51 FR 21164, June 11, 1986; 60 FR 63873, Dec. 12, 1995; 61 FR 8455, Mar. 4, 1996]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00544

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lam Ko
Chau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Lam Ko Chau
Lam Ko Chau, President (Principal Executive Officer), Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer

November 12, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5074 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5074

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2019

Mr. Panetta (for himself and Mr. Taylor) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 
 of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide transportation to and 
   from Department of Veterans Affairs facilities in connection with 
                vocational rehabilitation or counseling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Earned Transportation Act'' 
or the ``Vets ETA''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH VOCATIONAL 
              REHABILITATION OR COUNSELING.

    Section 111A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The Secretary'' and inserting ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (2).
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 393

- C R

Style: Christopher Ernest Braughton v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : August 31 , 201 5

Type of motion s : Defendant

- Appellant’s M otion t o Withdraw as C ounsel

Part ies filing motion s : Appell ant ’s Appointed Counsel Robert L. Sirianni, Jr.

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

Ordered that motion i s :

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it

complies with Rule 6.5 (d) and this Court already granted new counsel Niles Ill ich ’s

motion to substitute on August 27, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5( b), (d). Accordingly,

the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. as attorney for

appellant.

Judge ’ s signature:

_

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: September 10, 2015
§ 668.500 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This subpart identifies the types of activities that constitute aggressive and deceptive recruitment tactics or conduct by an eligible institution. An eligible institution has engaged in aggressive and deceptive recruitment tactics or conduct when the institution itself, one of its representatives, or any ineligible institution, organization, or person with whom the eligible institution has an agreement to provide educational programs, marketing, advertising, lead generation, recruiting or admissions services, engages in one or more of the prohibited practices in § 668.501. Aggressive and deceptive recruitment tactics or conduct are prohibited in all forms, including in the institution's advertising or promotional materials, or in the marketing or sale of courses or programs of instruction offered by the institution.
( b ) If the Secretary determines that an eligible institution has engaged in aggressive and deceptive recruitment tactics or conduct, the Secretary may: ( 1 ) Revoke the eligible institution's program participation agreement, if the institution is provisionally certified under § 668.13(c);
( 2 ) Impose limitations on the institution's participation in the title IV, HEA programs, if the institution is provisionally certified under § 668.13(c);
( 3 ) Deny participation applications made on behalf of the institution; or
( 4 ) Initiate a proceeding against the eligible institution under subpart G of this part.
( c ) The following definitions apply to this subpart: *Prospective student:* Has the same meaning in 34 CFR 668.71.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23




                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-64335 and 33-64335-01 of Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging
Corporation on Form S-3, of our report dated March 24, 1995, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 5, 1996








<PAGE>   2
                                                                EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-64335 and 33-64335-01 of Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging
Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated January 31, 1996 appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.

                                          /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 

                                              Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Los Angeles, California
March 5, 1996
### [§3112. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–79, §9(b)(3), Nov. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1079]

Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 820; Dec. 5, 1969, Pub. L. 91–135, §7(c), 83 Stat. 281; Nov. 8, 1978, Pub. L. 95–616, §3(j)(1), 92 Stat. 3112, provided for issuance of search warrants for seizure of animals, birds, and eggs. See section 3375 of Title 16, Conservation.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

CERTIFICATION 

I, Dean T. Johnson, certify that: 

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of The Aristotle Corporation; 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  March 29, 2005

/s/ Dean T. Johnson 

Dean T. Johnson

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 216

 211

 221

 199

 176

 203

 246

 253

 308

 292

 327

 321

 335

 366

 326

 322

 317

 360

 563

 489

 602

 742

 718

 826

 807

 942

 879

 1,005

 788

 678

 1,176

 152

 149

 141

 137

 141

 141

 145

 153

 160

 165

 164

 163

 166

 160

 157

 155

 158

 153

 155

 151

 158

 171

 179

 190

 212

 199

 208

 213

 200

 195

 199

 172

 174

 165

 162

 150

 152

 168

 179

 200

 199

 202

 208

 213

 214

 203

 196

 200

 194

 209

 218

 242

 247

 265

 302

 327

 350

 313

 337

 305

 321

 337

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,785

 2,762

 2,744

 2,729

 2,714

 2,700

 2,696

 2,659

 2,622

 2,611

 2,567

 2,541

 2,531

 2,558

 2,589

 2,611

 2,646

 2,678

 2,737

 2,803

 2,877

 2,945

 3,010

 3,113

 3,238

 3,380

 3,480

 3,603

 3,705

 3,830

 3,967

 199

 197

 196

 195

 194

 193

 193

 190

 187

 187

 183

 182

 181

 183

 185

 187

 189

 191

 196

 200

 206

 210

 215

 222

 231

 241

 249

 257

 265

 274

 283

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### **CHAPTER 11—IMPORTATION OF PRE-COLUMBIAN MONUMENTAL OR ARCHITECTURAL SCULPTURE OR MURALS**

Sec.
2091.
List of stone carvings and wall art; promulgation and revision; criteria for classification.
2092.
Export certification requirement.
2093.
Forfeiture of unlawful imports.
2094.
Rules and regulations.
2095.
Definitions.
### §3739. Supervision—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Control and supervision in appellate court, Rule 39(a).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was abrogated Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968, and is covered by Rule 27, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### §§ 682.206-682.207 [Reserved]
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of American Dairy, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of American Dairy,
Inc.





Date:  March
      30, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Leng You-BinLeng
      You-BinChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
              /s/ Jonathan H. ChouJonathan
      H. ChouChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to American Dairy, Inc. and will be retained
by American Dairy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 354

 440

 377

 313

 284

 320

 466

 355

 385

 351

 322

 275

 299

 321

 248

 227

 215

 223

 225

 235

 250

 279

 762

 908

 564

 563

 558

 809

 512

 390

 247

 254

 252

 244

 240

 238

 239

 230

 219

 217

 208

 202

 200

 200

 190

 185

 187

 187

 187

 186

 186

 173

 163

 188

 181

 185

 201

 202

 207

 178

 281

 299

 279

 265

 259

 254

 265

 255

 249

 241

 232

 221

 225

 232

 209

 207

 197

 206

 203

 198

 199

 206

 252

 263

 248

 259

 282

 327

 268

 248

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,466

 3,525

 3,562

 3,578

 3,590

 3,607

 3,634

 3,651

 3,660

 3,659

 3,642

 3,605

 3,583

 3,557

 3,485

 3,393

 3,311

 3,252

 3,196

 3,140

 3,074

 3,025

 3,028

 3,050

 3,066

 3,104

 3,161

 3,256

 3,315

 3,356

 248

 252

 254

 256

 256

 258

 260

 261

 261

 261

 260

 258

 256

 254

 249

 242

 237

 232

 228

 224

 220

 216

 216

 218

 219

 222

 226

 233

 237

 240

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### [§708. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title X, §1002(4), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2155]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 733; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §21a, 65 Stat. 719; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(E), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146, penalized certain uses of the Swiss Confederation coat of arms.
#### §§ 682.420-682.422 [Reserved]
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 09, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A1171. KAMIKIE WILKINS v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On July 27, 2020, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than August 06, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,292

 2,263

 3,381

 6,160

 2,153

 936

 603

 673

 380

 439

 289

 260

 248

 228

 233

 235

 268

 351

 332

 398

 382

 348

 312

 307

 290

 303

 278

 280

 311

 280

 239

 349

 337

 395

 559

 367

 304

 260

 296

 240

 222

 219

 221

 206

 202

 201

 204

 207

 225

 241

 255

 271

 265

 261

 260

 257

 257

 255

 258

 230

 169

 169

 443

 654

 1,035

 2,629

 1,066

 449

 328

 352

 279

 253

 238

 233

 227

 218

 210

 214

 222

 245

 260

 288

 296

 285

 280

 278

 271

 267

 264

 269

 260

 216

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 13,856

 12,931

 11,768

 13,155

 12,850

 12,057

 11,356

 10,654

 10,064

 9,593

 9,171

 8,810

 8,586

 8,404

 8,171

 7,731

 6,918

 4,534

 3,728

 3,567

 3,535

 3,468

 3,469

 3,494

 3,527

 3,561

 3,598

 3,649

 3,699

 3,701

 3,670

 990

 924

 841

 940

 918

 861

 811

 761

 719

 685

 655

 629

 613

 600

 584

 552

 494

 324

 266

 255

 253

 248

 248

 250

 252

 254

 257

 261

 264

 264

 262

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER