alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Terrence Riely, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paramco Financial Group, Inc.;



1.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



Date:  January 19, 2005





By: /s/ Terrence Riely

Terrence Riely

Chief Financial Officer
No. 12,164.

#### Tierney *v.*Tierney.

Decided October 14, 1929.

Mr. H. L. Ballard, Mr. J. A. C. Reynolds, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Louis A. Hellerstein, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered the -opinion of the court.

*363Sarah A. Tierney, plaintiff, wife of M. E. Tierney, defendant, brought this action to obtain a decree of divorce from him on the grounds of nonsupport and cruelty. Though personally served with summons, the defendant did not respond thereto or appear in person at the trial. The court, however, appointed an attorney to represent him. A jury was waived by counsel of both parties, evidence was produced, and the court found the defendant guilty as charged. Written appropriate findings of fact were made and conclusions of law stated by the trial court to the effect that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of divorce at the expiration of six months, provided such findings of fact and conclusions of law in the meantime have not been set aside.

Before the expiration of the six-months’ period, and about four months after the date of the interlocutory decree, plaintiff filed a petition in the cause in which she asked that these to her favorable findings of fact and conclusions of law entered thereon be vacated and set aside, and that the action be dismissed upon the grounds that she had forgiven her husband, that they had since the interlocutory decree was entered lived together as husband and wife, and that she did not wish a decree of divorce upon the findings of fact in her favor.

The defendant by his counsel resisted his wife’s petition and alleged that he did not want a reconciliation, but, on the contrary, desired a decree of divorce from his wife upon the findings of fact which the trial court had previously made in her favor. The court thereupon denied the plaintiff’s petition to set aside the findings and dismiss the action, and upon the defendant’s request and over the plaintiff’s protest and objection thereupon rendered a decree of divorce of the parties. The plaintiff wife is here with this writ of error to have the divorce decree set aside.

After the decree, now before us for review, was procured, we had occasion in *Walton v. Walton,*86 Colo. 1, 278 Pac. 780, to consider the jurisdiction and power of *364a trial court to award to a guilty party a decree of divorce over the protest and objection of the innocent party in whose favor findings of fact were made and an interlocutory decree thereupon awarded, which entitled her at a future time to an absolute or final decree. It was said in the opinion therein that, under our statute, no such power existed, and that, a plaintiff who has obtained an interlocutory decree in a divorce action may not be compelled by a guilty defendant to have a final decree over her objection. That decision makes void the decree now before us. The same is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to the district court to vacate and set aside this divorce decree and to dismiss the action.

Mr. Chief Justice Whitrord, Mr. Justice Adams and Mr. Justice Alter concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 5, 2011

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2009 2010 15

 448

 5,921

 2,000

 1,749

 704

 164

 469

 6,617

 5,000

 1,522

 201

 351

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2009 2010

 919

 1,774

 1,337

 412

 1,108

 198

 1,558

 3,319

 1,755

 624

 1,276

 374

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 350 247

 4,411 7,151

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,541

 5,648

 2,257

 1,011

 15

MILLERTON 1,938 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2010 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT 

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2010 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 35.16

 71.05

 67.25

 33.29

 42.85

 450

 7,035

 3,000

 1,748

 226

 210

 1,613 97

 2,656

 2,030

 547

 1,573

 284

 242

 6,674

 125

 86

 114

 81

 132

 102

 107

 32.85

 1,449

 6,193

 2,811

 1,149

 1,846

 106

 91

 80

 88

 105

 107

 63.43

 65.57

 27.16

 43.69

 112

 103

 123

 98

 48

 53

 35

 32

 35

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS

WY WY

WY WY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 707

 506

 360

 604

 445

 757

 1,424

 2,284

 2,480

 2,786

 2,747

 2,575

 2,268

 2,164

 1,670

 1,249

 1,570

 1,525

 1,872

 2,245

 3,059

 3,367

 2,777

 2,896

 2,461

 2,385

 2,188

 2,336

 1,700

 1,042

 1,092

 198

 188

 179

 175

 176

 179

 198

 186

 278

 303

 304

 321

 326

 307

 272

 254

 244

 254

 267

 298

 306

 278

 334

 274

 273

 315

 284

 314

 300

 286

 296

 295

 239

 210

 214

 212

 246

 334

 517

 597

 677

 737

 751

 720

 630

 562

 397

 384

 390

 498

 611

 759

 762

 770

 804

 681

 679

 676

 654

 546

 467

 423

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 6, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 5,633

 5,523

 5,378

 5,226

 5,046

 4,911

 4,802

 4,879

 5,017

 5,186

 5,419

 5,750

 6,092

 6,379

 6,646

 6,804

 6,978

 7,154

 7,440

 7,805

 8,230

 8,475

 8,648

 8,775

 8,719

 8,647

 8,603

 8,627

 8,611

 8,681

 8,720

 402

 395

 384

 373

 360

 351

 343

 349

 358

 370

 387

 411

 435

 456

 475

 486

 498

 511

 531

 558

 588

 605

 618

 627

 623

 618

 615

 616

 615

 620

 623

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 303.438 Civil action.

Any party aggrieved by the findings and decision issued pursuant to a due process complaint has the right to bring a civil action in State or Federal court under section 639(a)(1) of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1439(a)(1))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority and Health Disparities; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities Special Emphasis Panel, NIMHD Conference Grant 
Application (R13) Review.
    Date: April 7, 2011,
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 451-9536, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddb0b1bca8b9b8aeb5bcafad9db0bcb4b1f3b3b4b5f3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15787974607170667d7467655578747c793b7b7c7d3b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7919 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

p0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141346

ROBERT RAY MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141346 COA: 290465 Wayne CC: 08-106067-NF MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 25, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI                    
|Manouch Moshayedi Chief Executive
Officer

November 10, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 681

 458

 473

 433

 383

 450

 485

 519

 675

 761

 1,153

 1,470

 915

 698

 718

 597

 436

 350

 280

 365

 505

 313

 270

 360

 527

 515

 449

 539

 513

 469

 364

 155

 155

 156

 153

 164

 154

 148

 146

 149

 152

 143

 165

 166

 169

 191

 185

 153

 158

 149

 146

 146

 143

 142

 137

 146

 140

 161

 170

 171

 160

 152

 256

 241

 237

 229

 224

 206

 204

 197

 202

 232

 277

 317

 335

 300

 321

 282

 239

 216

 199

 183

 186

 168

 168

 177

 221

 238

 219

 248

 240

 225

 190

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 2,522

 2,609

 2,697

 2,777

 2,852

 2,911

 2,966

 3,014

 3,064

 3,135

 3,231

 3,327

 3,413

 3,457

 3,522

 3,563

 3,565

 3,552

 3,527

 3,504

 3,486

 3,457

 3,423

 3,368

 3,312

 3,233

 3,117

 3,065

 2,984

 2,927

 2,878

 180

 186

 193

 198

 204

 208

 212

 215

 219

 224

 231

 238

 244

 247

 252

 255

 255

 254

 252

 250

 249

 247

 245

 241

 237

 231

 223

 219

 213

 209

 206

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

October-09

Colored background verified with DFG's report Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 559 4,097 4,656 1,109 8,126 2-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 562 4,096 4,658 1,115 8,125 3-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 636 4,101 4,737 1,261 8,134 4-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 455 4,114 4,569 903 8,160 

5-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 474 4,096 4,571 941 8,125 

6-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 494 4,077 4,571 980 8,087 

7-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 4,102 4,374 539 8,136 

8-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 346 4,135 4,481 686 8,202 

9-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 443 3,908 4,351 878 7,752 

10-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 361 3,771 4,132 716 7,480 

11-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 447 3,772 4,219 886 7,482 

12-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 456 3,764 4,220 905 7,466 

13-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 486 3,746 4,231 963 7,430 

14-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 532 3,772 4,304 1,055 7,482 15-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,329 3,946 6,275 4,620 7,826 

16-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,936 4,019 6,955 5,824 7,971 

17-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,138 4,034 8,172 8,208 8,001 

18-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,835 4,035 7,870 7,606 8,004 

19-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,037 4,056 8,093 8,007 8,045 

20-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,626 4,077 6,703 5,209 8,086 

21-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,149 4,089 7,238 6,246 8,111 

22-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,911 4,091 7,002 5,773 8,115 

23-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,222 2,390 6,612 8,374 4,740 

24-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,643 3,607 8,250 9,209 7,155 

25-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,810 4,119 7,929 7,557 8,171 

26-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,856 4,072 7,928 7,649 8,077 

27-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,095 4,088 7,183 6,139 8,108 

28-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,683 4,042 6,725 5,322 8,018 

29-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,666 4,055 6,722 5,289 8,044 

30-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,957 4,064 6,021 3,881 8,061 

31-Oct-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,603 4,089 6,692 5,163 8,110 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 62,018 122,425 184,443 123,013 242,830 

Official numbers are posted on DFG's websiteNote: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks 

Tracy C
(No. 74-CC-450

#### Commonwealth Edison Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

George O. Shaffner and Joseph C. Sibley, Jr., Attorneys for Claimant.

*383William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00258-CR

MICHAEL JOSEPH FINN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F47142

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael Joesph Finn attempts to appeal from his conviction for the offense of 

continuous sexual abuse of a child. The sentence was imposed on April 9, 2014, and 

Finn filed his notice of appeal on August 22, 2014. Finn’s notice of appeal is untimely. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.1

 

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is 

rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by 
Finn v. State Page 2

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 11, 2014

Do not publish 

[CRPM] 

 

filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals 

within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the day the last timely 

motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2 (a).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50294 Summary Calendar

DEBRA LYNN PATMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES; VICTOR RODRIQUEZ, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES; ALL EIGHTEEN MEMBERS OF THE PAROLE BOARD; THOMAS MOSS, AMARILLO DIVISION, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-744

- - - - - - - - - - October 28, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Debra Lynn Patmore, # 603941, appeals the dismissal of her civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Patmore contends that when the defendants denied her parole review and release, they denied her due process and equal protection, that the Texas statutes in effect at the time that her offense was committed created a liberty interest in parole, that herNo. 96-50294 - 2 - parole was denied in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause, that she was being forced to serve her sentence “two times over,” that she should be brought up for parole annually, and that her Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment was violated when she was denied parole. We have reviewed the record and Patmore’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. Patmore v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles , No. A-95-CV-744 (W.D. Tex. April 8, 1996).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: March 28, 2011.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                Bank name                 City                 State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10350...........................  The Bank of          Wood Dale...............  IL.............       3/25/2011
                                   Commerce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-7800 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### § 6.713 [Reserved]