alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 77-CC-1265

#### Percy Anderson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 28, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of *237his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.*Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-123932 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 31, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Feihe International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") (which report expresses an unqualified opinion with an emphasis paragraph on the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern), and the effectiveness of Company's internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of one material weakness), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Feihe International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.





Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.


Beijing, the People’s Republic of China


April 8, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY  INVESTORS LIMITED  PARTNERSHIP V FOR
TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1996
<CASH>                                         800,741     
<SECURITIES>                                         0           
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,821     
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0     
<INVENTORY>                                          0           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               837,562     
<PP&E>                                      34,517,086  
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,087,478           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,050,643          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,418,498   
<BONDS>                                     21,337,592  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   
<PREFERRED>                                          0           
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,050,643         
<SALES>                                              0                   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,012,767           
<CGS>                                                0           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,994,570   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,764,998      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,160,419     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,262,141)           
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0           
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   
<CHANGES>                                            0           
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,262,141)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (58.29)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
### §1547. Alternative imprisonment maximum for certain offenses

Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for an offense under this chapter (other than an offense under section 1545)—

(1) if committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in 929(a)) is 15 years; and

(2) if committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) is 20 years.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title XIII, §130009(a)(6), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2030.)
§ 19.12 Furnishing facilities and assistance. The proprietor is required to provide TTB officers with the necessary facilities and assistance in order to gauge spirits in any container, or to examine any apparatus, equipment, containers, or materials, at the distilled spirits plant. Also, when requested by a TTB officer, the proprietor must: ( a ) Open any doors and open for examination any containers on the plant premises; and
( b ) Provide the exact locations (including the number of containers at each location) of all packages and similar portable approved containers within a given lot and the locations (that is, buildings, rooms, or areas) where spirits in cases are stored.
(26 U.S.C. 5202, 5203)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 333

 353

 241

 212

 201

 187

 185

 169

 167

 182

 197

 205

 180

 193

 191

 160

 158

 167

 203

 176

 174

 419

 602

 519

 656

 670

 515

 536

 569

 559

 503

 180

 177

 169

 160

 159

 151

 150

 144

 140

 139

 142

 145

 145

 143

 142

 145

 146

 146

 146

 136

 142

 144

 151

 159

 171

 186

 190

 188

 195

 209

 201

 233

 226

 196

 180

 175

 163

 157

 155

 150

 150

 154

 159

 153

 155

 152

 152

 153

 153

 155

 150

 150

 178

 222

 249

 279

 307

 284

 301

 306

 318

 284

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,324

 3,343

 3,334

 3,315

 3,293

 3,253

 3,161

 3,071

 2,979

 2,882

 2,761

 2,609

 2,498

 2,406

 2,325

 2,251

 2,208

 2,181

 2,161

 2,148

 2,141

 2,164

 2,236

 2,335

 2,460

 2,608

 2,739

 2,885

 3,039

 3,205

 3,336

 237

 239

 238

 237

 235

 232

 226

 219

 213

 206

 197

 186

 178

 172

 166

 161

 158

 156

 154

 153

 153

 155

 160

 167

 176

 186

 196

 206

 217

 229

 238

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 0

4 0 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0 0

6 663 149 263 263 19

7 502 155 277 540 39

8 576 167 304 844 60

9 974 196 359 1,203 86

10 814 191 291 1,494 107

11 990 165 286 1,780 127

12 453 164 209 1,989 142

13 432 159 220 2,209 158

14 704 160 250 2,459 176

15 758 164 262 2,721 194

16 1,261 171 327 3,048 218

17 1,122 172 328 3,376 241

18 1,361 171 376 3,752 268

19 1,512 177 437 4,189 299

20 1,936 197 598 4,524 323

21 1,524 219 529 4,776 341

22 1,164 200 427 4,899 350

23 928 198 336 4,876 348

24 761 192 301 4,886 349

25 538 184 279 4,879 349

26 329 169 208 4,878 348

27 458 162 207 4,865 348

28 555 159 210 4,825 345

29 518 157 208 4,771 341

30 554 157 224 4,668 333

31 496 160 237 4,577 327

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/8/2023
No. 12,183.

#### Rausch *v.*Cozian et al.

Decided October 28, 1929.

Mr. Richard Peete, Mr. Edwin H. Park, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. J. W. Kelley, Mr. J. D. Kelley, for defendants, in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

Grace Rausch, a minor, by her next friend sued James *390Cozian and Mary Cozian to recover damages received by being struck by defendants ’ automobile in December, 1924. She alleges that these injuries resulted in incurable valvular heart trouble and chronic appendicitis. On January 10, 1928, the case came on for trial before a jury. The plaintiff failed to appear and her counsel represented that she was too ill to attend court at that time: Testimony of various witnesses was taken as to her condition, whereby it developed that the plaintiff had chronic appendicitis and that an .operation had been advised and that it would be inadvisable for her to attend court. The court stated that it was unnecessary for the plaintiff to be in attendance during the entire trial and ordered the case to proceed, whereupon plaintiff’s counsel.asked for a continuance until the next morning, which was denied. Plaintiff’s attorney refused to proceed .with the trial of the case. Judgment was thereupon entered for the defendants, to which the plaintiff assigns error in refusing to grant a continuance.

A litigant has the right to be present to assist his counsel in the trial, and his necessary absence is a good reason for a continuance. *Elliott v. Field,*21 Colo. 378, 41 Pac. 504; *Lane v. Gooding,*63 Colo. 324, 166 Pac. 245.

The plaintiff is a minor and a ward of the court, and under such circumstances, the court is in duty bound to protect her rights, which cannot be waived either by her guardian ad litem or her attorney. *People ex rel. Porteus v. Barton,*16 Colo. 75, 26 Pac. 149; *Seaton v. Tohill,*11 Colo. App. 211, 53 Pac. 170; *Fetta v. Vandevier,*3 Colo. App. 419, 34 Pac. 168, affirmed in 20 Colo. 368, 38 Pac. 466.

These cases support the general rule in all jurisdictions. Applying the doctrine laid down in the foregoing decisions, it is clearly apparent that the trial court’s action in entering judgment for the defendants under the circumstances was too drastic.

A reasonable continuance should have been granted, *391and the plaintiff ordered or permitted to appear in court either to attend the trial of her case or to make a further showing as to her inability so to do.

It is not necessary for us to determine, and we do not hold, that a court has not the power to dismiss a case brought by a minor.

' The court erred in rendering* judgment for the defendants. The judgment is accordingly reversed and the district court directed to vacate the judgment entered for the defendants and to proceed with the trial of the case in accordance with the views herein stated.

Mr. Chibe Justice Whitrord, Mr. Justice Burke and Mr. Justice Alter concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                31587494
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           935629
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                             0
<PP&E>                                                               115363309
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        70346578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        77546425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                        0
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            60740696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          77546425
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      17609635
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      13140299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        4469336
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    4469336
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           4469336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             8.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                0


</TABLE>
#### Andrew F. Jessen, as Administrator, etc., of Augusta M. Jessen, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*J. L. Kesner Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

We think it was not error to submit the case to the jury. The substantial question presented on this appeal is whether there was evidence from which the jury could find that the deceased was free from contributory negligence. We think the jury was justified in finding that at the time the decedent passed behind the trolley car, the automobile was at such a distance from her that it would not have been contributory negligence for her to pass in front of it if she saw it. “ The rigorous rule applicable to steam railroad crossings is necessarily relaxed at the usual street crossings, and the footman is not required, as matter of law, to look both ways and listen, but only to exercise such reasonable care as the case requires, for he has the right to assume that a driver will also exercise due care and approach the crossing with his vehicle under proper control.” *(Baker*v. Close, 204 N. *Y.*92.) The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. McLaughlin and Dowling, JJ., dissented on the ground that there is no evidence from which the jury could find that the decedent was free from contributory negligence. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### § 84.655 Individual.

*Individual* means a natural person.

(Authority: E.O.s 12549 and 12689; 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3 and 3474; and Sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243 at 3327)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,269

 6,952

 7,411

 7,985

 8,623

 8,779

 9,283

 9,642

 9,306

 9,148

 8,000

 8,346

 7,665

 6,524

 6,264

 6,932

 8,747

 9,059

 7,491

 7,320

 7,914

 8,642

 7,991

 10,182

 6,569

 1,934

 897

 539

 356

 412

 496

 801

 1,060

 1,526

 1,796

 2,949

 2,406

 2,264

 2,124

 1,755

 1,131

 1,872

 1,345

 1,056

 1,066

 761

 1,426

 2,006

 2,051

 1,944

 1,736

 990

 1,285

 916

 1,287

 830

 262

 319

 241

 228

 222

 206

 3,698

 4,526

 4,958

 5,387

 5,914

 5,787

 5,432

 5,624

 4,969

 5,051

 4,760

 3,879

 4,479

 3,972

 4,082

 4,590

 5,733

 5,832

 4,916

 5,107

 4,865

 5,290

 4,747

 6,501

 3,172

 899

 436

 292

 287

 281

 269

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 50,042

 50,675

 52,273

 54,612

 57,437

 59,911

 61,856

 63,830

 64,614

 65,180

 65,397

 66,286

 67,519

 68,436

 68,820

 68,884

 69,659

 70,104

 69,106

 68,426

 67,859

 67,525

 67,303

 68,753

 67,165

 64,185

 60,142

 56,462

 52,667

 48,358

 42,894

 3,574

 3,620

 3,734

 3,901

 4,103

 4,279

 4,418

 4,559

 4,615

 4,656

 4,671

 4,735

 4,823

 4,888

 4,916

 4,920

 4,976

 5,007

 4,936

 4,888

 4,847

 4,823

 4,807

 4,911

 4,798

 4,585

 4,296

 4,033

 3,762

 3,454

 3,064

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,167.57

 1,167.51

 1,167.43

 1,167.37

 1,167.29

 1,167.23

 1,167.20

 1,167.07

 1,166.99

 1,166.90

 1,166.82

 1,166.77

 1,166.69

 1,166.63

 1,166.56

 1,166.50

 1,166.43

 1,166.35

 1,166.28

 1,166.22

 1,166.15

 1,166.09

 1,166.03

 1,166.96

 1,166.94

 1,165.91

 1,165.88

 1,165.85

 1,165.82

 1,165.79

 11.40

 11.35

 11.30

 11.26

 11.20

 11.16

 11.14

 11.05

 11.00

 10.94

 10.88

 10.85

 10.80

 10.76

 10.71

 10.67

 10.62

 10.57

 10.52

 10.48

 10.44

 10.40

 10.36

 10.98

 10.96

 10.28

 10.26

 10.24

 10.22

 10.20

STORAGE

-0.06

-0.04

-0.06

-0.04

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

-0.09

-0.06

-0.06

-0.05

-0.03

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

-0.04

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

+0.62

-0.01

-0.68

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

CHANGE

-4

6

-4

2

-4

5

17

-17

1

-9

-4

6

-3

5

1

5

2

-1

1

3

1

4

4

337

17

-321

14

17

17

15

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

OUTLET

 4

 7

 4

 3

 4

 6

 8

 7

 9

 2

 3

 3

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 3

 4

 7

 7

 5

C.F.S.

 .18

 .32

 .19

 .14

 .19

 .25

 .34

 .34

 .43

 .09

 .12

 .16

 .20

 .22

 .21

 .22

 .24

 .28

 .17

 .15

 .19

 .17

 .18

 .23

 .17

 .16

 .21

 .31

 .31

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 EAST PARK RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/30/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.26 113 600 0 144 6.60 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,260 224 1,190 0 286

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 AM.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,190

 1,190

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2020 .00

 11.45

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 7.08
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Timothy E. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 6, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      TIMOTHY E. BIXBYName:
              Timothy
      E. BixbyTitle:
              President
      and Chief Financial Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Exhibit 10.1



November 1, 2007



PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL



Mr. Julian Cusack


c/o Aspen Insurance Limited


Maxwell Roberts Building


1 Church Street


Hamilton HM 11



Dear Julian,



RE: Amended Statement of Employment — Housing Allowance



Following approval by the Compensation Committee, I am pleased to confirm that your housing allowance will be reinstated to $15,000.00 per month with effect from today, November 1, 2007, and will be reflected in the next payroll.



All other terms and conditions contained in your employment agreements/contracts remain the same.



To confirm your agreement to these terms and conditions please sign below and return one copy to Tracy Berkeley.



Kind regards,



/s/ Chris Woodman



Chris Woodman


Group Head of Human Resources



I acknowledge receipt of this letter and agree to its terms as noted above.






							
	Signed:			/s/  Julian  Cusack			Date:  1 November 2007
	 			Julian Cusack
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,431

 2,399

 4,061

 5,863

 6,073

 6,780

 4,246

 2,951

 3,373

 2,318

 1,750

 1,688

 1,825

 1,378

 1,303

 1,234

 1,032

 364

 400

 420

 319

 268

 287

 254

 244

 213

 202

 184

 178

 177

 183

 351

 344

 401

 565

 369

 309

 357

 455

 287

 261

 268

 281

 314

 310

 316

 296

 279

 257

 251

 220

 198

 193

 168

 173

 184

 190

 178

 168

 167

 169

 172

 589

 794

 1,248

 1,974

 3,267

 3,644

 2,568

 1,592

 1,091

 642

 577

 579

 698

 517

 430

 388

 349

 290

 297

 277

 247

 223

 198

 196

 197

 197

 189

 175

 171

 172

 178

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 17, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 16,996

 15,426

 14,528

 14,089

 14,724

 16,810

 18,306

 19,313

 19,922

 19,990

 19,918

 19,809

 19,886

 19,780

 19,621

 19,215

 18,316

 16,632

 13,662

 10,295

 7,974

 6,605

 5,712

 5,266

 4,886

 4,504

 3,995

 3,653

 3,394

 3,178

 3,007

 1,214

 1,102

 1,038

 1,006

 1,052

 1,201

 1,308

 1,380

 1,423

 1,428

 1,423

 1,415

 1,420

 1,413

 1,402

 1,373

 1,308

 1,188

 976

 735

 570

 472

 408

 376

 349

 322

 285

 261

 242

 227

 215

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER