alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
***Title:*** Africa’s  evolving infosystems : a pathway to security  and stability (Document)
Sudocs    No. 
[if !vml]>[endif]>D 5.425/3:2 | Item No. 0378-H-33| System    No. 000975275
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary OfTransportation 

### December 18, 2012
Mr. Pierre Murphy Law Offices ofPierreMurphy 1200 NewHampshire AveNW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 : '' 1200 NewJerseyAve., S.E. Washington, DC 20590



### RE: Docket DOT-OST-2012-0178, ApplicationofScott Air, LLC for a Certificate OfPublic Convenience andNecessity

DearMr. Murphy:
We have completed a review ofthe information filed on October 22, 2012, by Scott Air, LLC d/b/a Island Air Express ("Scott Air"), for a certificate ofPublic Convenience and Necessity to conduct scheduled interstate air transportation ofpersons, property, and mail.

We have determined that we will need additional and/or clarifying information before we may complete ourreview. The attached Information Request lists the areas where further information and/or clarification is necessary. I ask that you respond fully to this request within 30 days ofthe date ofthis letter.

In the meantime, as is the Department's practice, further processing ofyour application will be deferred pending receipt ofthis material. Thank you for your cooperation inthis matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter orthe requested information, please feel free to contact me at (202) 366-9998. Sincerely,

## fi,~/l

# ~Clr'-&~~~ 

# .**~**

Cc: Docket DOT-OST-2012-0178 Troy McClanahan Juneau FSDO AL05INFORMATION REQUEST Scott Air LLC d/b/a Island AirExpress

GENERALINFORMATION 1. Section 243.13 requires that each certificated air carrier that operates one or more covered flight segments file with the Department, via www.regulations.gov, in Docket DOT-OST-1998-3305 a brief statement summarizing how it will collect the passenger manifest information and transmit it to the Department of State following an aviation disaster. If the certificate authority sought would authorize the applicant to operate a covered flight segment, even though there may be no immediate plans to do so, the applicant should file the summary statement required by section 243.13. Ifthe applicant does not intend to operate any covered flight segments in the foreseeable future, the applicant must file in Docket DOT-OST-1998-3305 a statement so stating, and also stating that the applicant will not operate any covered flight segment unless and until it has filed the summary requiredby section 243.13.

MANAGEMENT AND KEY TECHNICAL PERSONNEL 1. The resume of Scott Air's Director of Maintenance, Chad Russell, indicates he is the
owner andmechanic ofan aircraft maintenance provider, PrecisionAircraft Maintenance, in Anchorage, Alaska and that he is the Director ofMaintenance for three small Part 135 air carriers. Please explain how Mr. Russell will divide his time between his businesses while also serving as Director ofMaintenance at ScottAir.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,001

 4,092

 3,576

 3,510

 3,960

 4,277

 5,172

 6,181

 7,063

 6,582

 6,746

 7,342

 8,042

 5,179

 3,661

 3,395

 2,976

 2,680

 2,439

 3,658

 5,406

 5,136

 5,316

 3,304

 3,489

 3,381

 3,083

 3,788

 2,884

 3,115

 3,595

 300

 382

 313

 431

 411

 444

 463

 462

 551

 388

 366

 358

 302

 378

 264

 315

 394

 297

 400

 493

 526

 314

 405

 275

 281

 298

 371

 528

 434

 360

 356

 1,975

 1,898

 1,575

 1,610

 1,576

 1,646

 1,924

 2,422

 2,748

 2,882

 2,877

 3,054

 3,264

 2,809

 2,123

 1,647

 1,229

 1,013

 1,098

 1,461

 1,960

 2,041

 1,857

 1,375

 1,496

 1,549

 1,589

 1,811

 1,661

 1,807

 1,706

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 27,502

 27,813

 27,827

 27,849

 27,620

 27,463

 27,580

 28,214

 28,957

 29,755

 30,576

 31,366

 31,478

 32,260

 32,408

 32,157

 31,811

 31,214

 30,736

 30,551

 30,587

 30,206

 29,315

 27,808

 26,427

 24,922

 23,247

 22,249

 21,787

 21,947

 22,424

 1,964

 1,987

 1,988

 1,989

 1,973

 1,962

 1,970

 2,015

 2,068

 2,125

 2,184

 2,240

 2,248

 2,304

 2,315

 2,297

 2,272

 2,230

 2,195

 2,182

 2,185

 2,158

 2,094

 1,986

 1,888

 1,780

 1,661

 1,589

 1,556

 1,568

 1,602

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: Stacey G. Kelly Case No. 20-30212

AMENDED DIRECTIVE FOR VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS BY DEBTOR

The debtors having filed a petition under Chapter 13, title 11 U.S.C. or converted this case

from Chapter 7;

IT IS DIRECTED;

That until further Directive from the Trustee, the debtor(s) shall pay to SUZANNE E. WADE,

TRUSTEE, P.O. BOX 983, Memphis Tennessee 38101-0983, $ 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 M o n t h l y beginning J u l y

2020.

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 04-1 OF THE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: June 23, 2020

/S/Suzanne E. Wade

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the debtor(s) on

the date above written.

/S/Suzanne E. Wade

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee
§ 76.720 State reporting requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) This section applies to a State's reports required under 2 CFR 200.327 (Financial reporting) and 2 CFR 200.328 (Monitoring and reporting program performance), and other reports required by the Secretary and approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
( b ) A State must submit these reports annually unless— ( 1 ) The Secretary allows less frequent reporting; or
( 2 ) The Secretary requires a State to report more frequently than annually, including reporting under 2 CFR 3474.10 and 2 CFR 200.207 (Specific conditions) and 2 CFR 3474.10 (Clarification regarding 2 CFR 200.207) or 2 CFR 200.302 Financial management and 200.303 Internal controls.
( c ) ( 1 ) A State must submit these reports in the manner prescribed by the Secretary, including submitting any of these reports electronically and at the quality level specified in the data collection instrument.
( 2 ) Failure by a State to submit reports in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section constitutes a failure, under section 454 of the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. 1234c, to comply substantially with a requirement of law applicable to the funds made available under that program.
( 3 ) For reports that the Secretary requires to be submitted in an electronic manner, the Secretary may establish a transition period of up to two years following the date the State otherwise would be required to report the data in the electronic manner, during which time a State will not be required to comply with that specific electronic submission requirement, if the State submits to the Secretary— ( i ) Evidence satisfactory to the Secretary that the State will not be able to comply with the electronic submission requirement specified by the Secretary in the data collection instrument on the first date the State otherwise would be required to report the data electronically;
( ii ) Information requested in the report through an alternative means that is acceptable to the Secretary, such as through an alternative electronic means; and
( iii ) A plan for submitting the reports in the required electronic manner and at the level of quality specified in the data collection instrument no later than the date two years after the first date the State otherwise would be required to report the data in the electronic manner prescribed by the Secretary.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1231a, and 3474)
[72 FR 3702, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 76094, Dec. 19, 2014]
## JLPARTMEN TO F iriANSPORWiOi ^ ;0-;KETCPFRAT[ON S 

## SERVE D DECEMBE R 12 , 201 1 .., ! rj[c[ 3 p j . 5 3

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F 

## D & M CUSTO M INJECTIO N MOLDIN GCORPORATIO N

FA A DOCKE T No . CP l IGLOOO O (Civi l Penalt y Case ) FDM S No . FAA-20 1 I -067 9 

## ORDERLIMITIN GHEARIN GT O SANCTIO N Responden t

D & M Custo mInjectio n Moldin g Corporatio n ("Respondent" ) ha s answere dou r

Novembe r

28 , 20 1 I Orde r

t o Sho w Cause . Responden t state s tha t

il ha s n o objectio at o gran t

o f th e motio n o f

Complainai U Fecieral Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant " o r

"th e agency" ) t o dee mth e allegation s o f th e agency' s Complain t admitted . I

t asks , i n accordanc e wit hComplainant' s alternativ e prayer , fo r ahearin g limite dt o th e issu e o f

sanction . Respondent' s request , an dtha i portio n o f Complainant' s Motio n t o Dee m Allegation s Admitted , i s hereb y GRANTED . Tha t portio n o f

Complainant' s Motio n whic hseek s adeterminatio n o n th e amoun t o f penalt y i s hereb y DENIED . Respondent , havin g admitte deac ho f Complainant' s allegations , i s foun di n ' violatio n o f

th e followin g Hazardou s Material s Regulations : 49C.F.R . §§171.2(e) . 172.200(a) , 172.204(a) , 172.301(a) , 172.400(a) , 172.600(c)(2) , 172.702(a) . l72.10Uh) , 172.312(a)(2) , 173.1(b) , 173.21(c) , 173.24(b)(1) , an d173.27(c)(1 ) a s se t ou t i n th e Complaint .

### Th e hearin g will b e limite dt o th e issu e o f

sanction . I

t will b e schedule db

y subsequent

order .

Attachment

- Servic e Lis t RichardC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg eFDM S No . FAA-2011-067 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Michae l Teofilovich , Presiden t D& M Custo mInjectio n Moldin g Corporatio n db aD& M Plastic s Corporation , Respomien t \5 0 Frenc hRoa d Burlington , I L6010 9 Kat e Barber , Complainan t 'A

- Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Grea t Lake s Region , AGL-7 B Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t

Devo n Avenu e DesPlaines,I L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-786 2 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y e.\pedHe dcourier, use tli

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration . 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wngh t Building—Suile 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20.'i9I ; AKention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
!"#$%%&'#(



(	

	


	)*!$+!"!"	


	




	

			


		

 !  "
#$%&

,-.

%
& 

	'()*+,- 

%#&   	      		  

  		        

  	      	 

(. 		

		

	

	.	
		.				
	

	 

%& /

		
					


 

  	  		 
  	.
  

.			

				 			  /



		
					




						 

%0& (.



1


	-		2	!'		( 
$30 


		
				0/	0




	
	

	
	&

	
		4	
.&		


#5&
	.					

				 *		.






	
	6

	7

4	
. 

%$&

%8& '		9

Case 20-31195-KLP Doc 61 Filed 01/29/21 Entered 01/29/21 14:37:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
!:4	;

9

('*-');<,-('+'+-+

-	4=======================

*/!>)'+?*!

@@	
, :

	
, :

	
	

 ' :6
5
A

+2/##
5

%5B0&#C385BB

2!:(9D#C5
$

Jan 28 2021

/s/ Keith L Phillips

Jan 29 2021

Case 20-31195-KLP Doc 61 Filed 01/29/21 Entered 01/29/21 14:37:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Henry J. Fuchs, M.D., the
President and Chief Executive Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company"), and David J. Tucker the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates and shall not
be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 12th
day of November, 2004.

/s/ Henry J. Fuchs                                /s/ David J. Tucker
--------------------------                        ------------------------------
Henry J. Fuchs, M.D.                              David J. Tucker
President and Chief Executive Officer             Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  CERTIFICATION  I, Steven B. Lapin, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, of The Aristotle Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  April 27, 2007  /s/ Steven B. Lapin  Steven B. Lapin President and Chief Operating Officer
. . . . 

. .. 

. .. .. : 

.: 

.. 

.. . : .. 

. . .. 

. . ... . .. . . . . . . . 

: :.'.:.'.: '•. ::::::' :: : :...':::::: ..' SIOUX'CITY BRICK & TILE COMP ,ANY.':-:: 

_-:3 10. South r10 d Boulevard 

.... . Y. . .........•.. 

... .......,: •:•. • . ~8 . .. .. _.•. •• . 

. ..... .... . ..... 

.......:::::.. , ..,.,.,;•,•.: ~ . 

~• -.::•::.•.: •..•.::...•.•. •.:-. : ~

., •: ... . . , 

. ... . . ... 

•. ••.•...•. . . . 

~ . ..•.: •: ...., •.;.; .;.:.. 

•. .. . 

... . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . .• . •. -. : ~ .: :- ::: • ~ •:•: ~•~ . . 

•':•`•••.<• •: 

.. ... . . .. 

::P.O. •Box 07.: 

.'Sio~r► Citj, Ioii!~i 51102,d807 : 

;:':•.; ~.: ~.~ : :: ~::~ 

.. • , • . . . . • . . 

.. . . . . • . .Telephone 7l2_ 202_ 11Qa 

"lve Z1iRke Great Brick" FAX ':'-712 252-321 S 

May 15, 2013 

Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy 

Coi-tney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget 

Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: 

I am writing today as the CEO of a small brick manufacttuing company that has the potential to be 

significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the bi7ck and structural 

clay processing industry. Although we are a formal Small Entity Representative (SER) in the cuiTent 

review panel being conducted under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

(SBREFA), we are not members of the Brick Industiy Association (BIA). However, ali of our industry 

is working together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the 

activities on this rule. We consider them to be speaking on all industi-y's behalf as they work with you. 

My concern is that this rulemaking will penalize brick companies that acted in good faith and invested 

large sums of money in emission control equipment, which now may have be altered or removed. 

Secondly, current economic conditions in the brick industiy are at depression levels not seen in this 

industry since World War II. It is completely unrealistic to think that brick companies can finance the 

expenditures needed under the terms of this rulemaking. 

I would ask that you grandfather brick companies that complied with the original MACT Standard as a 

matter of simple fairness. 

Sincerely, 

c 

Mark B. Mahoney, C O
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: LECLAIRRYAN PLLC, Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

 Chapter 7 

Debtor. 

 

LYNN L. TAVENNER, 

as Chapter 7 Trustee, 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 20-03142-KRH 

ULX PARTNERS, LLC, 

ULX MANAGER LLC, 

UNITEDLEX CORPORATION, and 

GARY LECLAIR, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________ 

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

This matter comes before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of 

Virginia (this “Court”) upon the Defendants ULX Partners, LLC’s, ULX Manager LLC’s, and 

UnitedLex Corporation’s Motion to Partially Dismiss the First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 87] 

(the “ULX Motion”) filed by ULX Partners, LLC, ULX Manager LLC, and UnitedLex 

Corporation (collectively, the “ULX Entities”) and Gary D. LeClair’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF 

No. 104] (the “GDL Motion” and, together with the ULX Motion, the “Motions”) filed by Gary 

LeClair (“LeClair” and, together with ULX Entities, the “Defendants”), whereby the Defendants 

seek dismissal of certain counts included in the First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 86]. Lynn L. 

Tavenner, in her capacity as Chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of LeClairRyan PLLC, 

filed an omnibus response [ECF No. 106], addressing both Motions. LeClair and the ULX Entities 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 115 Filed 11/03/21 Entered 11/03/21 15:26:52 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

filed replies [ECF Nos. 108, 109]. The Court conducted a hearing (the “Hearing”) on the Motions 

on October 19, 2021. At the conclusion of the Hearing, the Court took the Motions under 

advisement. After due consideration of the arguments of counsel at the Hearing, the pleadings, 

and the authorities cited by the parties in their memoranda of law, and for the reasons stated in the 

Memorandum Opinion issued contemporaneously with this Order, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED. 

Dated: November 3, 2021 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

Entered on Docket: 

Copies to: 

Erika L. Morabito

Quinn Emmanuel 

1300 I Street, NW 

Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20005 

Brittany Jane Nelson

Quinn Emmanuel 

1300 I Street 

Washington, DC 20005 

David G. Barger

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

1750 Tysons Blvd 

Suite 1000 

McLean, VA 22102 

Thomas John McKee, Jr. 

Greenberg Traurig 

1750 Tysons Blvd 

Suite 1000 

McLean, VA 22102 

 

Nov 3, 2021

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 115 Filed 11/03/21 Entered 11/03/21 15:26:52 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

Andrew M. Bowman

Gentry Locke 

10 Franklin Rd SE, Suite 900 

Roanoke, VA 24011 

Jeffrey Scott Sexton

Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP 

P.O. Box 40013 

Roanoke, VA 24022 

William A. Broscious

William A. Broscious, Esq., PLC 

P.O. Box 71180 

Henrico, VA 23255 

Case 20-03142-KRH Doc 115 Filed 11/03/21 Entered 11/03/21 15:26:52 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3