alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Orgler, Appellant.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 682.408 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF RYERSON INC.

The subsidiaries of Ryerson Inc. (other than certain subsidiaries which, considered in
the aggregate as a single subsidiary, do not constitute a significant subsidiary), three of which are incorporated in the State of Delaware, as noted below, and each of which is wholly owned by Ryerson Inc., are as follows as of December 31,
2006:

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.

(a Delaware corporation)

Ryerson Americas, Inc. f/k/a Ryerson Tull International, Inc.

(a Delaware corporation)

Ryerson Procurement Corporation f/k/a Ryerson Tull Procurement Corporation

(a Delaware corporation)

Integris Metals, Ltd.*

(a Canadian corporation)

| | 
| | 

* merged with Ryerson Canada, Inc. effective
January 1, 2007
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

July-10

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Colored background verified with DFG's report Official numbers are posted on DFG's website

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 412 342 754 1,337 0 0 4,799 4,039 8,838 9,518 8,012 17,53

2-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 122 340 462 1,223 0 0 5,996 4,252 10,248 11,893 8,433 20,32

3-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 40 321 361 704 0 0 6,619 4,176 10,795 13,129 8,283 21,41

4-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 335 282 617 582 0 0 6,550 4,159 10,709 12,992 8,249 21,24

5-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 24 204 228 534 0 0 6,495 4,178 10,674 12,883 8,288 21,17

6-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 60 132 192 499 0 0 6,494 4,159 10,653 12,880 8,250 21,13

7-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 54 67 121 452 0 0 5,585 4,204 9,788 11,077 8,338 19,41

8-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 82 67 149 422 0 0 5,812 4,202 10,014 11,528 8,335 19,86

9-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 125 52 177 360 0 0 6,697 4,196 10,893 13,284 8,322 21,60

10-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 196 24 220 349 0 0 6,286 4,202 10,489 12,469 8,335 20,80

11-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 80 8 88 334 0 0 4,987 3,451 8,438 9,891 6,845 16,73

12-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 99 16 115 303 0 0 5,571 3,577 9,147 11,050 7,094 18,14

13-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 59 16 75 277 0 0 5,571 3,568 9,139 11,051 7,077 18,12

14-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 148 16 164 266 0 0 4,202 3,920 8,122 8,335 7,775 16,11

15-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 48 59 107 220 0 0 4,207 4,290 8,497 8,345 8,509 16,85

16-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 165 24 189 200 0 0 4,054 4,259 8,313 8,042 8,447 16,48

17-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 14 12 26 176 0 0 3,978 4,266 8,245 7,891 8,462 16,35

18-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 36 12 48 136 0 0 4,024 4,258 8,282 7,982 8,446 16,42

19-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 32 36 68 124 0 0 3,907 4,258 8,165 7,749 8,446 16,19

20-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 66 48 114 119 0 0 4,251 4,263 8,514 8,432 8,456 16,88

21-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 22 108 130 119 0 0 4,517 4,300 8,818 8,960 8,530 17,49

22-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 122 12 134 118 0 0 5,070 4,247 9,317 10,057 8,423 18,48

23-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 108 72 180 118 0 0 5,070 4,297 9,368 10,057 8,524 18,58

24-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 11 168 179 116 0 0 4,884 4,193 9,077 9,687 8,317 18,00

25-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 38 48 86 115 0 0 5,070 3,966 9,037 10,057 7,867 17,92

26-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 24 72 96 114 0 0 5,066 3,999 9,066 10,049 7,933 17,98

27-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 13 12 25 110 0 0 6,010 4,248 10,257 11,920 8,425 20,34

28-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 6,112 4,213 10,325 12,124 8,356 20,48

29-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 18 24 42 94 0 0 5,941 4,206 10,147 11,784 8,343 20,12

30-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 58 24 82 86 0 0 5,659 4,187 9,846 11,225 8,305 19,53

31-Jul-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 6,059 4,175 10,234 12,018 8,281 20,29

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 2,611 2,618 5,229 XXXX 0 0 165,545 127,908 293,453 328,359 253,706 582,06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combine
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Yvon Leveille, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Adsero Corp.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: August 21, 2006          /s/ Yvon Leveille
                                        -----------------
                                        Yvon Leveille
                                        Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, INCLUDED IN THE FORM FORM 10-Q OF SUNGARD
DATA SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          36,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,658
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,314
<PP&E>                                         251,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 613,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,766
<BONDS>                                          3,413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           424
<OTHER-SE>                                     447,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   613,791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  304,059<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,032<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24<F3>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND PURCHASED IN-
PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER CHARGES.
<F2>PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER CHARGES.
<F3>INCLUDES PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER CHARGES
TOTALING $0.33 PER DILUTED SHARE AND $0.34 PER BASIC SHARE. ALSO INCLUDES
SEPTEMBER 1997 TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT.
</FN>




</TABLE>
(No. 7074

#### Max Shaps, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

Max Shaps, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*461Per Curiam.
FINAL

2012 AQMP

COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED POST CLOSE OF 

COMMENT PERIOD 

FOR THE 2012 AQMP

DECEMBER 2012
CL-1

COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED 

DATE AGENCY/ COMPANY

11/16/12 REALTORS Committee on Air Quality

11/30/12 APL

11/30/12 Association of American Railroads

11/30/12 California Trucking Association

11/30/12 Harbor Association of Industry & Commerce

11/30/12 Southern California Business Coalition

11/30/12 TraPac

12/03/12 Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

12/03/12 Southern California Gas Company (SDGE)

12/04/12 California Communities Against Toxics - NRDC

12/06/12 Mayor Bob Foster

12/06/12 Robin Suwol

12/06/12 U.S. EPA

12/07/12 East Yard Communities
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-2

Additional AQMP Comment Letters Received After Close of Comment Period

REALTORS Committee on Air Quality, November 16, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-3
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-4

APL, November 30, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-5
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-6

Association of American Railroads, November 30, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-7
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-8
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-9
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-10
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-11

California Trucking Association, November 30, 2012
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-12
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-13
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-14

Harbor Association of Industry & Commerce, November 30, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-15

Southern California Business Coalition, November 30, 2012
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-16
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-17
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-18
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-19
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-20
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-21
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-22

TraPac, November 30, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-23

Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, December 03, 2012
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-24

Southern California Gas Company (SDGE), December 03, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-25
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-26
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-27
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-28
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-29

California Communities Against Toxics - NRDC, December 04, 2012
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-30
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-31
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-32

Mayor Bob Foster, December 06, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-33
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-34

Robin Suwol, December 06, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-35

U.S. EPA, December 06, 2012
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-36

East Yard Communities, December 07, 2012
Final 2012 AQMP

CL-37
Comment Letters Received Post Close of Comment Period

CL-38
§ 79.73 Appeals procedures. ( a ) An appeal must be in writing and must be received by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program within 60 days of the date of the Decision denying the claim, unless a greater period has been permitted. Appeals must be sent to the following address: Radiation Exposure Compensation Program, Appeal of Decision, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044-0146.
( b ) The claimant or eligible surviving beneficiary must set forth in the appeal the reason(s) why he or she believes that the Decision of the Assistant Director is incorrect.
( c ) Upon receipt of an appeal, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program shall forward the appeal, the Decision, the claim, and all supporting documentation to the Appeals Officer for action on the appeal. If the appeal is not received within the 60-day period, or such greater period as may be permitted, the appeal may be denied without further review.
( d ) The Appeals Officer shall review any appeal and other information forwarded by the Program. Within 90 days after the receipt of an appeal, the Appeals Officer shall issue a Memorandum either affirming or reversing the Assistant Director's Decision or, when appropriate, remanding the claim to the Assistant Director for further action. The Memorandum shall include a statement of the reason(s) for such reversal, affirmance, or remand. The Memorandum and all papers relating to the claim shall be returned to the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program, which shall promptly inform the claimant or eligible surviving beneficiary of the action of the Appeals Officer. A Memorandum affirming or reversing the Assistant Director's Decision shall be deemed to be the final action of the Department of Justice on the claim.
( e ) Before seeking judicial review of a decision denying a claim under the Act, an individual must first seek review by the designated Appeals Officer. Once the appeals procedures are completed, an individual whose claim for compensation under the Act is affirmed on appeal may seek judicial review in a district court of the United States.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5238 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5238

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to include digital breast 
 tomosynthesis as a primary and preventative health care service under 
          the military health system and the TRICARE program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2019

 Ms. Houlahan (for herself, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Cisneros, Ms. Spanberger, 
 Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Schrier, 
Mr. Cook, Mr. Phillips, and Ms. Slotkin) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to include digital breast 
 tomosynthesis as a primary and preventative health care service under 
          the military health system and the TRICARE program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Better and Robust Screening Today 
Act'' or the ``BRST Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) A woman born today has a one in eight chance of being 
        diagnosed with breast cancer at some time during her life.
            (2) Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and 
        the second leading cause of cancer death among women.
            (3) Death rates from breast cancer in the United States 
        have dropped 40 percent between 1989 and 2017 which translates 
        to 375,900 deaths avoided during those 28 years.
            (4) The decline in breast cancer death rates have been 
        attributed to both improvements in treatment and early 
        detection and screening.
            (5) When breast cancer is detected in an early and 
        localized stage, the five-year survival rate is 99 percent, 
        further demonstrating why proper screening is essential.
            (6) Conventional mammography and digital mammography are 
        known to be less effective in the breast cancer screening 
        process for all women, including those with dense breast 
        tissue, than digital breast tomosynthesis screening.
            (7) Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration cover 
        digital breast tomosynthesis mammography screenings.
            (8) The TRICARE program does not currently cover digital 
        breast tomosynthesis mammography screenings.

SEC. 3. IMPROVEMENT TO BREAST CANCER SCREENING.

    Section 1074d(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, including 
through the use of digital breast tomosynthesis''.
                                 <all>
```
Statement of Account for Bluepoint Medical Associates

There was a payment agreement for arrearages, for which Bluepoint 

complied until the end of April, 2019. They paid through April 19, 2019 as 

agreed, but only paid $1,450 on April 26, 2019, leaving $1,050 owed for the 

payment due date of April 26th. Therefore there is owed:

4/26 $1,050

5/3 $3,500

5/10 $3,500

5/17 $3,500

5/24 $3,500

5/31 $1,536.95

6/1 $6,200

7/1 $6,200

8/1 $6,946.95

9/1 $6,946.95

TOTAL: $42,880.85

Case 19-13121-KHK Doc 38-3 Filed 10/23/19 Entered 10/24/19 00:00:43 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 3 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNV9230000 L13100000.FI0000 241A; NVN-78597; NVN-85277; NVN-85278; 
11-08807; MO<greek-i>4500019638; TAS: 14x1109]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Leases; Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement from Makoil, Inc. and Piney Fork Production Co., for 
competitive oil and gas leases NVN-78597, NVN-85277, and NVN-85278 on 
land in Nye County, Nevada. The petition was timely filed and was 
accompanied by all the rentals due since the leases terminated under 
the law. No valid leases have been issued affecting the lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Atanda Clark, BLM Nevada State Office, 
775-861-6632, or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eeaf9a8f808a8fb1ad828f9c85ae8c8283c0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fabb8e9b949e9ba5b9969b8891ba989697d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rental and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessees have 
paid the required $500 administrative fee for each lease and have 
reimbursed the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. 
The lessees have met all of the requirements for reinstatement of the 
leases as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1920 [30 U.S.C. 188], and the BLM is proposing to reinstate the 
leases effective July 1, 2010 under the original terms and conditions 
of the leases and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. 
The BLM has not issued a lease affecting the lands encumbered by these 
leases to any other interest in the interim.

    Authority: 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b).

Gary Johnson,
Deputy State Director, Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-8073 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
File No. 74359

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

The undersigned hereby appears in these Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Proceedings as 

Counsel for First Home Mortgage Corporation, and requests that Samuel I. White, P.C. be 

placed upon the mailing list of those Creditors, parties in interest and Counsel who receive 

all Notices in these proceedings.

Respectfully submitted,

SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.

By: /s/ BRANDON R. JORDAN

Eric D. White, Esquire, Bar No. 21346

Michael T. Freeman, Esquire, Bar No. 65460

Brandon R. Jordan, Esquire, Bar No. 72170

Johnie R. Muncy, Esquire, Bar No. 73248

Nisha R. Patel, Esquire, Bar No. 83302

Samuel I. White, P.C.

1804 Staples Mill Road, Suite 200

Richmond, VA 23230

Tel.: (804) 290-4290

Fax: (804) 290-4298

bjordan@siwpc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 7, 2020, the foregoing Notice was served via CM/ECF on 

Suzanne E. Wade, Trustee, and Patrick Thomas Keith, Counsel for Debtor, at the email 

addresses registered with the Court, and that a true copy was mailed via first class mail,

postage prepaid, to Paul Richard Stewart, Debtor, 5854 Pilmour Drive, Providence Forge, VA 

23140.

/s/ BRANDON R. JORDAN

Brandon R. Jordan, Esquire

Samuel I. White, P. C.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In re:

PAUL RICHARD STEWART, CHAPTER 13

DEBTOR. CASE NO. 20-30038-KLP

Case 20-30038-KLP Doc 6 Filed 01/07/20 Entered 01/07/20 16:36:33 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ventures-United, Inc. a Utah corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert C. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Robert C. Taylor

Robert C. Taylor

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2006