alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 303.126 Early intervention services in natural environments. Each system must include policies and procedures to ensure, consistent with §§ 303.13(a)(8) (early intervention services), 303.26 (natural environments), and 303.344(d)(1)(ii) (content of an IFSP), that early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities are provided— ( a ) To the maximum extent appropriate, in natural environments; and
( b ) In settings other than the natural environment that are most appropriate, as determined by the parent and the IFSP Team, only when early intervention services cannot be achieved satisfactorily in a natural environment.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(16))
#### Henry Hier et al. v. Allen Hutchings.

Filed March 22, 1899.

No. 8836.

1. Habeas Corpus: Discharge of Prisoner: Unlawful Rearrest: Penalty. To entitle a party aggrieved to a judgment for the amount prescribed, by section 361 of tbe Criminal Code it is merely required that the conditions described in said section be shown to exist. The amount of recovery is liquidated by the statute referred to.

2. Review: Parties: Joinder: New Trial. Where parties seeking relief join in a motion for a new trial and in a petition in error, if relief must be denied as to one it must be denied as to all.

Error from the district court of Box Butte county. Tried below before Kinicaid, J.

*Affirmed.*

*William Mitchell,*for plaintiffs in error:

Defendant in error, without express authority of statute, cannot maintain in his own name an action for the penalty prescribed by section 361 of the Criminal Code, forbidding the rearrest of a prisoner who had been discharged oh habeas corpus. *(Colburn v. Swett,*42 Mass. 232; *Omaha é R. V. R. Co. v. Hale,*45 Neb. 418; *Si. Louis, A. & T. R. Co. v. State,*19 S. W. Rep. [Ark.] 572; *Fleming v. Bailey,*5 East [Eng.] 313; *Barnard v. Gostling,*2 East .[Eng.] 569.) •

*C. M. Sullivan*aud *R. C. Holeman, contra.*

*335Ryan, C.

In this action there was a recovery in the district court of Box Butte county of the sum of $500 under the provisions of section 361 of the Criminal Code. The jury found specially that constable 1-Iier received notice, before taking Hutchings into his custody, that Hutchings had already been released on habeas corpus from the custody of an officer by whom he had been arrested upon a mittimus in the same case as that in which was issued the mittimus by virtue of which constable Hier arrested him and carried him to the county seat, a distance of about fifteen miles, and that said constable continued to hold Hutchings in custody after receiving the notice aforesaid. The section of the Criminal Code above referred to provides that in such case the party offending shall forfeit to the party aggrieved the sum of $500. The evidence fully sustained the findings of the jury, and' it is not necessary that we should review it for the purpose of justifying this conclusion. In their nature these damages were general *(Bank of Commerce v. Goos,*39 Neb. 437), and hence it was proper that the statute should liquidate them,- as was done by the provisions of the section above cited. In principle the same question was decided adversely to the contention of the plaintiffs in error in *Clearwater Bank v. Kurkonski,*15 Neb. 1, and in *Perkins v. Butler County,*16 Neb. 314. The sureties on his official bond were joined as defendants with the constable, and the judgment was against all the defendants jointly. Whether or not this was proper we express no opinion, for the motion for a new trial and the petition in error were made jointly by the parties complaining. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
### §1621. Perjury generally

Whoever—

(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;

is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 88–619, §1, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 94–550, §2, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§231, 629 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §125, 35 Stat. 1111; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §19, 40 Stat. 230).

Words "except as otherwise expressly provided by law" were inserted to avoid conflict with perjury provisions in other titles where the punishment and application vary.

More than 25 additional provisions are in the code. For construction and application of several such sections, see Behrle v. United States (App. D.C. 1938, 100 F. 2d 714), United States v. Hammer (D.C.N.Y., 1924, 299 F. 1011, affirmed, 6 F. 2d 786), Rosenthal v. United States (1918, 248 F. 684, 160 C.C.A. 584), cf. Epstein v. United States (1912, 196 F. 354, 116 C.C.A. 174, certiorari denied 32 S. Ct. 527, 223 U.S. 731, 56 L. ed. 634).

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

Minor verbal changes were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" in concluding provisions.

1976—Pub. L. 94–550 divided existing provisions into a single introductory word "Whoever", par. (1), and closing provisions following par. (2), and added par. (2).

1964—Pub. L. 88–619 inserted at end "This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
### §3584. Multiple sentences of imprisonment

(a) Imposition of Concurrent or Consecutive Terms.—If multiple terms of imprisonment are imposed on a defendant at the same time, or if a term of imprisonment is imposed on a defendant who is already subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment, the terms may run concurrently or consecutively, except that the terms may not run consecutively for an attempt and for another offense that was the sole objective of the attempt. Multiple terms of imprisonment imposed at the same time run concurrently unless the court orders or the statute mandates that the terms are to run consecutively. Multiple terms of imprisonment imposed at different times run consecutively unless the court orders that the terms are to run concurrently.

(b) Factors To Be Considered in Imposing Concurrent or Consecutive Terms.—The court, in determining whether the terms imposed are to be ordered to run concurrently or consecutively, shall consider, as to each offense for which a term of imprisonment is being imposed, the factors set forth in section 3553(a).

(c) Treatment of Multiple Sentence as an Aggregate.—Multiple terms of imprisonment ordered to run consecutively or concurrently shall be treated for administrative purposes as a single, aggregate term of imprisonment.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2000.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
#### § 636.201 What selection procedures and award criteria may be used?

You should consider using two-phase selection procedures for all design-build projects. However, if you do not believe two-phase selection procedures are appropriate for your project (based on the criteria in § 636.202), you may use a single phase selection procedure or the modified-design-build contracting method. The following procedures are available:

| Selection procedure | Criteria for using a selection procedure | Award criteria options |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) Two-Phase Selection Procedures (RFQ followed by RFP) | § 636.202 | Lowest price, Adjusted low-bid (price per quality point), meets criteria/low bid, weighted criteria process, fixed price/best design, best value. |
| (b) Single Phase (RFP) | Project not meeting the criteria in § 636.202 | All of the award criteria in item (a) of this table. |
| (c) Modified Design-Build (may be one or two phases) | Any project | Lowest price technically acceptable. |
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 5,639 871 2,701 44,995 3,214

2 6,109 853 2,934 45,126 3,223

3 6,363 768 2,802 44,745 3,196

4 6,727 683 2,868 44,011 3,144

5 6,517 629 3,417 44,090 3,149

6 7,447 958 3,981 44,977 3,213

7 7,997 1,119 4,073 45,536 3,253

8 7,660 1,033 3,997 46,008 3,286

9 7,603 1,518 4,394 47,038 3,360

10 7,909 1,480 4,496 48,052 3,432

11 6,869 870 3,820 48,331 3,452

12 6,427 1,164 3,623 48,777 3,484

13 6,992 1,630 3,979 49,746 3,553

14 7,115 1,481 3,982 51,067 3,648

15 6,896 1,032 3,789 52,155 3,725

16 7,372 789 3,736 52,957 3,783

17 8,122 944 4,500 54,655 3,904

18 9,750 1,286 5,143 56,930 4,066

19 9,132 1,043 5,593 59,106 4,222

20 9,787 632 5,127 60,252 4,304

21 8,593 1,149 5,271 61,450 4,389

22 8,040 1,008 4,630 62,083 4,435

23 7,651 886 4,556 62,245 4,446

24 7,350 1,356 4,599 62,348 4,453

25 7,226 1,702 4,698 63,226 4,516

26 7,931 1,954 4,909 64,512 4,608

27 8,023 2,102 4,904 65,437 4,674

28 7,759 1,749 4,470 65,925 4,709

29 7,435 1,362 4,125 66,261 4,733

30 8,285 1,148 4,554 67,079 4,791

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: September 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 397

 386

 355

 330

 325

 330

 386

 415

 423

 318

 310

 307

 301

 291

 294

 284

 282

 287

 325

 384

 428

 446

 374

 314

 286

 284

 300

 305

 307

 319

 327

 357

 333

 319

 306

 310

 305

 304

 326

 300

 292

 290

 288

 282

 267

 267

 256

 256

 244

 251

 248

 249

 251

 251

 254

 266

 264

 275

 275

 275

 295

 302

 379

 355

 338

 315

 316

 316

 324

 351

 327

 299

 296

 294

 289

 277

 278

 270

 264

 259

 269

 275

 281

 291

 281

 274

 275

 276

 286

 287

 293

 304

 311

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 250

 235

 225

 211

 211

 211

 216

 233

 218

 201

 199

 198

 195

 187

 188

 183

 179

 176

 182

 186

 190

 196

 190

 185

 186

 187

 193

 193

 197

 204

 208

TOTAL 9,250

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
DISABILITY COMPENSATION

SPECIAL MONTHLY COMPENSATION (SMC) 

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federal employment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about Disability Compensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver 

Program, Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.

CAN A VETERAN RECEIVE ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS FOR SERIOUS 

DISABILITIES?

VA can pay additional compensation to a Veteran who, as a result of military service, incurred the loss 

or loss of use of specific organs or extremities.

WHAT IS CONSIDERED LOSS OR LOSS OF USE?

Loss, or loss of use, is described as either an amputation or, having no effective remaining function of 

an extremity or organ. The disabilities VA can consider for SMC include: 

 loss, or loss of use, of a hand or foot

 immobility of a joint or paralysis

 loss of sight of an eye (having only light perception) 

 loss, or loss of use, of a reproductive organ 

 complete loss, or loss of use, of both buttocks

 deafness of both ears (having absence of air and bone conduction)

 inability to communicate by speech (complete organic aphonia)

 loss of a percentage of tissue from a single breast, or both breasts, from mastectomy or 

radiation treatment

WHAT IF I HAVE A COMBINATION OF THESE DISABILITIES?

The VA will pay higher rates for combinations of these disabilities such as loss or loss of use of the 

feet, legs, hands, and arms, in specific monetary increments, based on the particular combination of 

the disabilities. There are also higher payments for various combinations of severe deafness with 

bilateral blindness.
Compensation Service – February 2015 

Additional SMC is available if a Veteran is service-connected for paraplegia, with complete loss of 

bowel and bladder control. 

In addition, if you have other service-connected disabilities that, in combination with the above 

special monthly compensation, meet certain criteria, a higher amount of SMC. 

CAN VA PAY SMC FOR BEING BEDRIDDEN, HOUSEBOUND, OR IN NEED OF THE AID AND 

ATTENDANCE OF ANOTHER PERSON?

If a Veteran is service-connected at the 100% rate and is housebound, bedridden, or is so helpless as 

to need the aid and attendance of another person, then payment of additional SMC can be considered. 

The amount of SMC will vary depending on the level of disability.

HOW CAN YOU APPLY?

You should contact your local VA regional office for information about applying for SMC. In 

determining eligibility for SMC, the VA must review the applicable medical evidence and then make a 

decision regarding the level of SMC to be paid.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 1996, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                   3,922,660
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,346,134
<ALLOWANCES>                             (13,717)
<INVENTORY>                              2,923,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         9,680,938
<PP&E>                                   3,628,095
<DEPRECIATION>                           (2,017,622)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           19,769,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,956,245
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 10,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              200
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             19,769,028
<SALES>                                  8,255,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         8,255,607
<CGS>                                    4,101,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            9,479,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         46,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       435,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,706,248)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,706,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,706,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.19)
        





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       99
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,183
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,673
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Less than .01 per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
September 13, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CONRADO CALDERAS , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00549

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decisi on certified below for observance.
(No. 74-CC-3

#### Town House Hotel, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 15, 1973.*

Town House Hotel, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of American Dairy, Inc (the "Company") of (1) our report
dated March 12, 2006 related to the financial statements of the Company as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, which appear in the Company's Form 10K for the year ended December 31,
2005.


/s/ Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co. PLLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 30, 2006


                                       33
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 19-73008-SCS Doc 1 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 11:14:34 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
I I --, 

## Before the United States Department ofTransportation

-· 1 '-· i <.; . 1 1 I 

# Washington, DC

August 15 ,2012

Essential Air Service at CLOVIS, NEW MEXICO SILVER CITY/HURLEY/DEMING, NEW MEXICO 

### under49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq. 

### tttqc,-JC\02. DocketOST-1997 29&& DocketOST-1998=3568' 

### 1'\'\C.-**t'\0~**



### This documentcontains Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.'s response to Order Requesting Proposals 2012-7-20. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submitthese proposalsto provide essential airtransportation atthese points in New Mexico. These proposals are submitted on a stand alone basis. Great Lakes maintains interlineticketing and baggage agreementswith the majority ofthe carriers serving the Denverand Phoenix hubs, including interline e-ticketing agreementswith American Airlines, DeltaAirlines, FrontierAirlines, United Airlines and U.S. Airways. All ofwhich will offerthese New Mexico markets supplemental access to the domestic and international airtransportation system. All proposals contemplate the use of 19 seat Beechcraft 1900D airlinerequipment. Questions and comments may be referred to: Michael 

### 0. Matthews Chief Financial Officer Great LakesAviation, Ltd. 1022 Airport Parkway Cheyenne, VVY 82001 (307) 432-7000Table ofContents: Subsidy Passengers Average Proposal Service Point(s) Hub(s) Served Round Trips Equipment Requirement Forecast Fare Part Clovis DEN 2 1900D $1,954,490 7,500 $144.97

2 Silver City/Hurley/Deming DEN or PHX 2 1900D $2,098,460 6,000 $137.85 Total Total Bid Proposal: $4,052,949

# Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Annual Compensation Requirementsfor Essential Air Service at 

### Clovis, New Mexico to Denver (DEN) Two Round Trips - 81900 - one stopvia ALS, LBL, SAF or PUB (at 98 percent completion) Departures: Block Hours:

Operating Revenues: Passenger: 7,500 psgrs at

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) Total Operating Revenues: OpeMIIrtg Expenses:· Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance Fuel and Oil Flying Operations Maintenance Total Direct Expenses: Total Indirect Expenses: Total Operating Expenses: Operating Loss Profit Element (5.0% ofTotal Operating Expenses) Annual Compensation Requirement: $144.97 $1,087,275
$6,741

$365,710 $917,795 $289,801 $415,070 1,227 1,636

$1,094,016

$1,988,376

$914,963 $2,903,339 1.809.323)

$145,167 $1,954,490

# Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at 

### Silver City/Hurley/Deming, New Mexico to Denver (DEN) or Phoenix (PHX) Two Round Trips- 81900- one stop via ALS, SAF, PUB or non stopto PHX (at 98 percentcompletion) Departures: Block Hours:

Operating Revenues: Passenger: 6,000 psgrs at

Other: (at 0.62% ofpassenger revenue) Total Operating Revenues: Operating Expenses: Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance Fuel and Oil Flying Operations Maintenance Total Direct Expenses: Total Indirect Expenses: Total Operating Expenses: Operating Loss Profit Element (5.0% ofTotal Operating Expenses) Annual Compensation Requirement: $137.85 $827,100
$5,128

$365,710 $837,810 $272,441 $401,137 1,227 1,538

$832,228

$1,877,098

$914,033 $2,791,131 ($1 ,958.903) $139,557 $2,098,460