alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GRALING EDWARD ARNOLD, a/k/a Graling Shykia

Asante,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (CR-00-8; CA-02-677)

Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Graling Edward Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood,

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Graling Edward Arnold seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Arnold has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Arnold’s motion for appointment of counsel,

deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00074-CV

IN RE WILLIAM R. NORTON

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Lasagna Vaughn sued William R. Norton for damages resulting from personal injuries 

allegedly received in an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict for Vaughn and awarded 

damages of $21,886.00 in past physical pain and mental anguish, $23,114.00 in past medical 

expenses, and zero for all other elements of damage submitted to the jury. Vaughn filed a motion 

for new trial. On June 25, 2019, the trial court granted Vaughn’s motion for new trial, stating only 

that the verdict was against the great weight and preponderance of evidence presented at trial. The 

order did not explain the basis of the trial court’s conclusion that the verdict was against the great 

weight and preponderance of the evidence. 

Norton filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court, seeking to vacate the trial court’s 

June 25, 2019, order granting Vaughn’s motion for new trial. After Norton filed his petition for 

writ of mandamus, the trial court entered an amended order on August 21, 2019, that specifically 

detailed the court’s reasons for granting a new trial. Because Norton complained of the June 25, 

2019, order and that order is now moot, we deny the requested relief. See In re Smith, No. 06-10-

00116-CV, 2010 WL 4679853 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Nov. 18, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. 

op.).

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: August 28, 2019

Date Decided: August 29, 2019
### §958. Commission to serve against friendly nation

Any citizen of the United States who, within the jurisdiction thereof, accepts and exercises a commission to serve a foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people, in war, against any prince, state, colony, district, or people, with whom the United States is at peace, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §21 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §9, 35 Stat. 1089).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
!"#$% &'

(	
	  )*+	!



												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 
,*+											 	 												

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INCUR DEBT

THIS MATTER came to be heard on the Motion to Incur Debt filed by the Debtors; and

it

APPEARING TO THE COURT that the Debtors filed this case under Chapter 13 of the

U.S. Bankruptcy Code on October 28, 2019; and it

-'	..
/	**	*	
,*+		))0	1+		
00		*2+	

))+		0	*	*	
,*+		*	2*	1	34!5!#!	)02	*+*	*	%6"7	)+	2

*	,	+)	8*	$4	920	*0:	):*	1	36%%	 1+	*	)2+	1		4;$	:*

<6	+	0+	0=	*	
,*+		*	)2+	*	+1+	0	*	*+0	*	

1+	8+>		*+	**+=	*	)2+	1	*	0			*	,*	*+*	1	*	
,*+	

800	 10**	*+	,0*:	*	 )+1+	 2+	*+	)*+	 !	.0	 10	 +=	*	
,*+

)*+	!	.0		,	1+=		*+		,		,?*	10	*		*=	

*

-'	..
/	**	
,*+	*	*	 
2+	
,*	 20	,	 @+*=	*	

*+1+

A		&	B<C	D!;;%

&	E	..5	.

!!	*	+:	*+*

5	<+@		4!4

0)	B%;6	44"F";;

-0	B%;6	44"F"%

0	?>G>))

	


Case 19-35678-KRH Doc 31 Filed 01/20/21 Entered 01/20/21 09:37:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4


	**	
,*+	*	*	
2+	
,*	,5		*			+,:	@+* and the

Debtors shall be permitted to borrow *	2*	 1	 34!5!#!	 )02	*+*	*	 %6"7	)+

2	*	,	 +)	8*	$4	920	*0:	):*	1	36%%	 1+	*	)2+	1		4;$

:*	<6	+	0+	0

5	<+@


*	HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

*	**	C>+2)*:	A2@

*+		
>*	HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

.
	C(

	 	 II	A		&							 	 												 	 												

A		&	B<C	D!;;%

&	E	..5	.

!!	*	+:	*+*

5	<+@	4!4

0)	B%;6	44"F";;

-0	B%;6	44"F"%

0	?>G>))

	


	
	/
	

	 	 II	2J		K	 													 	 												

2J		K5	)*+	!	+2*

$4;4	/0	-+*	
+5	2*	4;4

5	<	4!44#



	

4

Jan 15 2021 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

 Jan 20 2021

Case 19-35678-KRH Doc 31 Filed 01/20/21 Entered 01/20/21 09:37:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4

	+,:	+*1:	**	*	++		,	+	,:	00	+:	)+*

	 	 II	A		&							 	 												 	 												

	A		&

!

Case 19-35678-KRH Doc 31 Filed 01/20/21 Entered 01/20/21 09:37:58 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
	
	

A		&5	92+

&	E	..5	.

!!	*	+:	*+*

5	<+@	4!4

2J		K5	)*+	!	+2*

$4;4	/0	-+*	
+5	2*	4;4

5	<	4!44#

11	1	*	*	**	+2*

$;	*	C+	*+*5	2*	6!;6

5	<		4!4

6

Case 19-35678-KRH Doc 31 Filed 01/20/21 Entered 01/20/21 09:37:58 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
#### § 675.49 Procedures and records.

In administering a Work-Colleges program under this subpart, an institution shall comply with the applicable provisions of 34 CFR part 673 and this part 675.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2756b)

[59 FR 61418, Nov. 30, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 60396, Nov. 27, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 874

 870

 805

 851

 817

 933

 917

 884

 911

 913

 895

 915

 971

 934

 891

 819

 781

 802

 845

 1,055

 1,045

 970

 927

 947

 855

 795

 897

 893

 864

 774

 832

 785

 747

 717

 780

 765

 799

 786

 825

 837

 841

 838

 820

 877

 812

 800

 748

 733

 735

 714

 672

 871

 890

 857

 871

 765

 694

 676

 675

 676

 740

 754

 840

 801

 756

 819

 790

 872

 862

 852

 865

 878

 870

 875

 927

 875

 832

 784

 754

 775

 773

 885

 946

 920

 894

 913

 807

 748

 760

 745

 777

 747

 783

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 535

 511

 483

 522

 504

 555

 549

 543

 551

 559

 554

 557

 589

 557

 530

 501

 482

 495

 494

 563

 601

 585

 568

 580

 515

 478

 486

 476

 496

 478

 500

TOTAL 25,725

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §1525. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–762, §2, Nov. 5, 1966, 80 Stat. 1312

Section, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §525, 46 Stat. 741, authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to employ not more than ten persons in the District of Columbia who have been detailed from the field force of the Customs Service.
#### § 75.190 Consultation.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70322, Aug. 29, 2024.

Each applicant that intends to develop curricula or instructional materials under a grant is encouraged to assure that the curricula or materials will be developed in a manner conducive to dissemination, through continuing consultations with publishers, personnel of State and local educational agencies, teachers, administrators, community representatives, and other individuals experienced in dissemination.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
§ 361.65 Allotment and payment of Federal funds for vocational rehabilitation services. ( a ) *Allotment.* ( 1 ) The allotment of Federal funds for vocational rehabilitation services for each State is computed in accordance with the requirements of section 110 of the Act, and payments are made to the State on a quarterly basis, unless some other period is established by the Secretary.
( 2 ) If the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan designates one State agency to administer, or supervise the administration of, the part of the plan under which vocational rehabilitation services are provided for individuals who are blind and another State agency to administer the rest of the plan, the division of the State's allotment is a matter for State determination.
( 3 ) *Reservation for pre-employment transition services.* ( i ) Pursuant to section 110(d) of the Act, the State must reserve at least 15 percent of the State's allotment, received in accordance with section 110(a) of the Act for the provision of pre-employment transition services, as described in § 361.48(a) of this part.
( ii ) The funds reserved in accordance with paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section— ( A ) Must only be used for pre-employment transition services specified in § 361.48(a); and
( B ) Must not be used to pay for administrative costs, (as defined in § 361.5(c)(2)) associated with the provision of such services or any other vocational rehabilitation services.
( b ) *Reallotment.* ( 1 ) The Secretary determines not later than 45 days before the end of a fiscal year which States, if any, will not use their full allotment.
( 2 ) As soon as possible, but not later than the end of the fiscal year, the Secretary reallots these funds to other States that can use those additional funds during the period of performance of the award, provided the State can meet the matching requirement by obligating the non-Federal share of any reallotted funds in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated.
( 3 ) In the event more funds are requested by agencies than are available, the Secretary will determine the process for allocating funds available for reallotment.
( 4 ) Funds reallotted to another State are considered to be an increase in the recipient State's allotment for the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 110, and 111 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 730, and 731)
§ 692.113 What are the matching requirements for the GAP Program? ( a ) The matching funds of a partnership— ( 1 ) Shall be funds used for making LEAP Grants to eligible students under this subpart;
( 2 ) May be— ( i ) Cash; or
( ii ) A noncash, in-kind contribution that— ( A ) Is fairly evaluated;
( B ) Has monetary value, such as a tuition waiver or provision of room and board, or transportation;
( C ) Helps a student meet the cost of attendance at an institution of higher education; and
( D ) Is considered to be estimated financial assistance under 34 CFR 673.5(c); and
( 3 ) May be funds from the State, institutions of higher education, or philanthropic organizations or private corporations that are used to make LEAP Grants under GAP.
( b ) The non-Federal match of the Federal allotment shall be— ( 1 ) Forty-three percent of the expenditures under this subpart if a State applies for a GAP allotment in partnership with— ( i ) Any number of degree-granting institutions of higher education in the State whose combined full-time enrollment represents less than a majority of all students attending institutions of higher education in the State as determined by the Secretary using the most recently available data from IPEDS; and
( ii ) One or both of the following— ( A ) Philanthropic organizations that are located in, or that provide funding in, the State; or
( B ) Private corporations that are located in, or that do business in, the State; and
( 2 ) Thirty-three and thirty-four one-hundredths percent of the expenditures under this subpart if a State applies for a GAP allotment in partnership with— ( i ) Any number of degree-granting institutions of higher education in the State whose combined full-time enrollment represents a majority of all students attending institutions of higher education in the State as determined by the Secretary using the most recently available data from IPEDS; and
( ii ) One or both of the following— ( A ) Philanthropic organizations that are located in, or that provide funding in, the State; or
( B ) Private corporations that are located in, or that do business in, the State.
( c ) Nothing in this part shall be interpreted as limiting a State or other member of a partnership from expending funds to support the activities of a partnership under this subpart that are in addition to the funds matching the Federal allotment.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-3a)
EX-10.3






ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT




THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Assignment”)
dated as of October 25, 2007, is made and entered into by and between TRIPLE NET PROPERTIES, LLC, a
Virginia limited liability company (“Assignor”), and NNN VF 7777 BONHOMME AVENUE LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), with reference to the following Recitals:



RECITALS




A. Assignor is “Buyer” under that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement mutually executed as of
September 19, 2007, by and between Assignor and SEVENS ST. LOUIS L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company, as the same may be amended (the “Purchase Agreement”), wherein Assignor
agreed to purchase certain real property commonly known as the Sevens Building in St. Louis,
Missouri as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement, on the terms and conditions set
forth in the Purchase Agreement.



B. Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume from
Assignor, all of Assignor’s right, title, claim. and interest in, to and under the Purchase
Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals (which are incorporated herein by
this reference) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee hereby agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




1. Assignment; Assumption. Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all of
Assignor’s right, title, claim and interest as “Buyer” or otherwise in, to and under the Purchase
Agreement. By executing this Assignment, Assignee hereby accepts such assignment and expressly
agrees to assume and be bound by all of the provisions of the Purchase Agreement from and after the
date hereof.



2. Successors and Assigns. This Assignment shall inure to the benefit of, and be
binding upon, the successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of the
parties hereto.



3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts with
the same effect as if all of the parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be
construed together and shall constitute one agreement.



[Signatures on next page]






1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.



ASSIGNOR:



TRIPLE NET PROPERTIES, LLC,


a Virginia limited liability company



By: /s/ Andrea R. Biller

Name: Andrea R. Biller

Title: Executive Vice President







ASSIGNEE:



NNN VF 7777 BONHOMME AVENUE, LLC,





a Delaware limited liability company



By: NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC,




a Delaware limited liability company,


its sole member




By: Triple Net Properties, LLC,



a Virginia limited liability company,



its manager




By: /s/ Richard Hutton

Name: Richard Hutton

Title: Executive Vice President





2
### §1412. Program goals

The goals of the Program are to ensure that all regulations and rulings that are administered or enforced by the Customs Service are administered and enforced in a manner that—

(1) is uniform and consistent;

(2) is as minimally intrusive upon the normal flow of business activity as practicable; and

(3) improves compliance.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §412, as added Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §631(2), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2189.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996,
BOTH INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FORM 10-K OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          46,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,391
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,457
<PP&E>                                         267,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 679,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,266
<BONDS>                                          4,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           423
<OTHER-SE>                                     464,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   679,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670,309
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,037<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,083<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,569
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81<F3>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND PURCHASED IN-PROCESS
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER COSTS.
<F2>PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER COSTS.
<F3>INCLUDES PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVLOPMENT AND OTHER COSTS TOTALLING
$0.78 PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 29, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 29, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0106. LANDMARK URBAN CONSTRUCTION GA, LLC et al. v. MILLER MASONRY, L.L.C..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV297336
(No. 74-CC-212

#### Superior Ambulance Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Superior Ambulance Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Senetek PLC, (the Company) on Form
10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank J. Massino, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ FRANK J. MASSINO                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Frank J. Massino                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer