alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.403 Application to receive spirits in bond. ( a ) When the proprietor of a distilled spirits plant qualified under 26 U.S.C. 5171 or of an alcohol fuel plant qualified under 26 U.S.C. 5181 wishes to have spirits or denatured spirits transferred in bond to his plant from another distilled spirits plant, the proprietor must complete an application on form TTB F 5100.16, Application for Transfer of Spirits and/or Denatured Spirits in Bond, in triplicate, and forward it to the appropriate TTB officer for approval. A proprietor is not required to submit an application on TTB F 5100.16 for transfers from customs custody under 26 U.S.C. 5232.
( b ) Except to the extent the proprietor is not required to provide a bond under § 19.151(d), TTB will not approve the application submitted under paragraph (a) of this section unless the proprietor's operations bond or unit bond either is in the maximum penal sum amount or is sufficient to cover the tax on the spirits or denatured spirits to be transferred in addition to all other liabilities chargeable against the bond. If TTB approves the application, TTB will return two signed copies of the approved application to the proprietor.
( c ) Upon receipt of an approved application from TTB, the proprietor must retain one of the signed copies for his files and forward the other signed copy to the consignor that will ship the spirits or denatured spirits.
(26 U.S.C. 5005, 5112)
[T.D. TTB-92, 76 FR 9090, Feb. 16, 2011, as amended by T.D. TTB-146, 82 FR 1123, Jan. 4, 2017]
### subpart 1—relief from imports benefiting from agreement
#### Charles B. Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Charles T. De Mott, Appellant.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ro opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KELLY KNOTT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00235-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20130D03561)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

July 22, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza, the State’s Attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 22, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8

th day of June, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 220-6 Filed 07/13/21 Entered 07/13/21 12:41:43 Desc

Chase available data Page 1 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 220-6 Filed 07/13/21 Entered 07/13/21 12:41:43 Desc

Chase available data Page 2 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 220-6 Filed 07/13/21 Entered 07/13/21 12:41:43 Desc

Chase available data Page 3 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 220-6 Filed 07/13/21 Entered 07/13/21 12:41:43 Desc

Chase available data Page 4 of 4
### SUBTITLE IV—CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION
#### Joan Cohn, Respondent, *v.*Ansonia Realty Company, Appellant.

First Department,

June 5, 1914.

See head note in *Cohn*v. *Ansonia Realty Co. (ante,*p. 791). .

Appeal by the defendant, Ansonia Realty Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 22d day of October, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury for $1,000, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on *795the 6th day of November, 1913, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*George J. McDonnell,*for the appellant.

*Wales F. Severance,*for the respondent.

Scott, J.:

This action was tried with that of Aida Cohn, who was plaintiff’s wife.

For the reason stated in the case of said Aida Cohn against the same defendant, this judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Clarke and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred; McLaughlin, J., dissented.

McLaughlin, J.

(dissenting):

This action was brought to recover damages for loss of services of plaintiff’s wife. It was tried with her action to recover damages for her injuries. Plaintiff had a recovery of $1,000.

For the reason stated by me in the opinion in *Cohn*v. *Ansonia Realty Co.*(162 App. Div. 791), decided herewith, I think this judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
### From: 

### Robert Stanford [mailto:stanford@alaska.coml 

### Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:26 PM To: 

### 'Kevin.Adams@dot.gov' 

### Subject: Karluk Eas Proposal OST-2004-19342 Department ofTransportation OST-2004-19342
Kevin Adams: >'- ,**~'** ' 

### .

. •

At the end ofthe current subsidy rate period for Karluk Alaska(March 31, 2012), Redemption Inc dba Island Air Service is willing to continue aThree day per week scheduled service into Karluk Alaska (ADQ to KYK) unsubsidized. Scheduling will meetthe postal service requirements ofthree weekly roundtrips with a 5 seat Piper Cherokee (PA-32), forthe passenger, freight and mail carrying needs of the community based on the revenue PEQ's Of Island Air overthe previous two year period. Island Air is capable of meeting the historical traffic needs of Karluk and any foreseeable growth ifnecessary.
Robert GStanford Island Air Service Stanford@alaska.com 9075391182
Exhibit 10.1

July 30, 2010

LOGO

David Cathcart

Chief Financial Officer

TRX, Inc.

2970 Clairmont Road

Suite 300

Atlanta, GA 30329



|Re: | Amendment 2 to Second Letter of Amendment
|--- | -----------------------------------------

Dear
David:

The purpose of this letter is to amend the Second Letter of Amendment dated December 23, 2010 as amended on June 7, 2010.
Effective July 30, 2010, Expedia and TRX now agree to amend the Second Letter of Amendment as follows:

Section 3 is hereby
deleted and replaced with the following:

3) Renewal of Pricing and Exclusivity for 2011. The pricing and exclusivity
terms set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 of this Second Letter of Amendment will automatically be extended for calendar year 2011 unless either Party gives the other Party written notice of non-renewal of such terms on or before
September 1, 2010. If such notice is given, Section 1 and Section 2 will cease to apply, effective December 31, 2010, and the pricing terms under the Agreement (and associated SOWs) that were in place prior to this Second Letter
of Amendment will apply in calendar year 2011.

Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below and
returning a signed copy to me as soon as possible. If you do not agree with any of the foregoing, please contact me as soon as possible so that we can determine how best to proceed.



Yours truly,Expedia, Inc./s/ Kerri LandeisKerri Landeis Vice President,
Global Supply Operations




|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                        
|TRX, Inc.               
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ David D. Cathcart  
|Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

|             |  |             
|------------ |  | ------------
|Date Signed: |  | 30 July 2010
#### Paul Dickey, Plaintiff, v. Christopher A. Gortner, Defendant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### George W. Littell v. Anna M. Cross.

Filed May 17, 1899.

No. 8896.

Review: Unautiienticated Transcript oe Judgment: Dismissal. A petition in error will be dismissed in the absence of an authenticated transcript of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed.

Error from the district court of Pierce county. Tried below before Robinson, J.

*Dismissed.*

*John O. Licey*and *B. B. Willey,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. W. Quivey, contra.*

*595Noe.val, J.

The record in this case is authenticated as follows:

> “The State of Nebraska, *\*Pierce County. j ss'

> I, R. A. Tawney, clerk of the district court of Pierce county, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original bill of exceptions in the said cause upon the testimony taken on the motion for a new trial, and also a true and perfect transcript of the petition, answer, and instructions given in said action'as the same are on file and of record in my office.

> “[seal.] R.’a. Tawney,

> *“Clerk of the District Court.”*

It will be observed that the foregoing makes no mention of the final judgment entered in the district court.. In the absence of an authenticated transcript of the judgment or order sought to be reviewed the petition in error must be dismissed. *(Bailey v. Eastman,*54 Neb. 416.)

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        306,072    
<SECURITIES>                                        0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                 128,258    
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,094      
<INVENTORY>                                         0          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              512,016         
<PP&E>                                      1,986,955      
<DEPRECIATION>                                425,030      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,051,419      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         325,536      
<BONDS>                                       800,153    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,895      
<PREFERRED>                                         0          
<COMMON>                                            0          
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,148,621       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,051,419         
<SALES>                                             0                  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              952,312            
<CGS>                                               0                  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 618,779            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0               
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,531          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             57,514          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               211,402         
<INCOME-TAX>                                  101,948        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           109,454        
<DISCONTINUED>                              (102,956)  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0              
<CHANGES>                                           0          
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,498      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .04        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0           
        
                                  

</TABLE>
#### § 11.5 Delegations of the Administrator.

Most of the regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.11, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 11, Consignment Sales. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16924, Apr. 4, 2006]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 473.50

 474.20

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.36

 474.36

 474.36

 474.35

 474.35

 474.34

 474.34

 474.33

 474.09

 473.76

 473.44

 473.09

 472.73

 472.38

 472.33

 472.30

 472.80

 473.11

 473.43

 473.72

 474.15

 1,214,232

 1,221,702

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,412

 1,223,412

 1,223,412

 1,223,305

 1,223,305

 1,223,198

 1,223,198

 1,223,091

 1,220,527

 1,217,005

 1,213,592

 1,209,863

 1,206,031

 1,202,309

 1,201,778

 1,201,459

 1,206,776

 1,210,076

 1,213,485

 1,216,578

 1,221,168

 3,826

 7,668

 3,749

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,814

 3,787

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3,733

 3,768

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL April 30, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2013 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 9,388 7,501 3,059 34,263

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 2,452

 7,470

 1,924

 0

 0

 0

 0

-214

 0

 0

-107

 0

-107

 0

-107

-2,564

-3,522

-3,413

-3,729

-3,832

-3,722

-531

-319

 5,317

 3,300

 3,409

 3,093

 4,590

 67

 26

 20

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 6

 2

 2

 2

 22

 227

 299

 310

 324

 346

 372

 362

 372

 278

3,166

7,610

3,761

-1

3,999

3,999

3,999

-97

-1

3,999

3,951

3,999

-49

-1

-51

-10

30

74

-89

-3,989

-4,023

-409

-902

3,333

3,336

-396

-535

-440

ELEV STORAGE

 22,844

 728,699

 736,309

 740,070

 740,069

 744,068

 748,067

 752,066

 751,969

 751,968

 755,967

 759,918

 763,917

 763,868

 763,867

 763,816

 763,806

 763,836

 763,910

 763,821

 759,832

 755,809

 755,400

 754,498

 757,831

 761,167

 760,771

 760,236

 759,796

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 725,533

0

0

0

0

4,000

4,000

4,000

0

0

4,000

4,000

4,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24,000
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Raymond Sprague, Appellant, against Joseph H. Brophy, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Respondent.

All concur.
### §1589a. Enforcement authority of customs officers

Subject to the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury, an officer of the customs may—

(1) carry a firearm;

(2) execute and serve any order, warrant, subpena, summons, or other process issued under the authority of the United States;

(3) make an arrest without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the officer's presence or for a felony, cognizable under the laws of the United States committed outside the officer's presence if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony; and

(4) perform any other law enforcement duty that the Secretary of the Treasury may designate.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §589, as added Pub. L. 98–573, title II, §213(a)(17), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2988.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 589 of act June 17, 1930, as added by Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §320, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2056, was classified to section 1589 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–690.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 589 of act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, 46 Stat. 750, related to unlawful relanding and was classified to this section, prior to repeal by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948. See section 544 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 15, 1984, see section 214(e) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 1304 of this title.
### §1366. General Agreement on Tariff and Trade unaffected

The enactment of sections 1352(a), (c), 1354, and 1360 to 1367 of this title, and section 624(f) of title 7, shall not be construed to determine or indicate the approval or disapproval by the Congress of the Executive Agreement known as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

(June 16, 1951, ch. 141, §10, 65 Stat. 75.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 1362 to 1365 of this title, included in the reference to sections 1360 to 1367 of this title, were repealed by Pub. L. 87–749, title II, §257(e)(1), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 882; section 1367 of this title was repealed by Pub. L. 87–456, title III, §303(c), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 78.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Tariff Act of 1930 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in act July 1, 1954, ch. 445, §3, 68 Stat. 360, other sections of which amended section 1352(c) of this title and enacted section 1352a of this title; and in act Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 348, title I, §103, 67 Stat. 472, which act amended section 624(b) of title 7, and sections 1330(d), 1352(c) and former section 1364(a) of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1351 and 1364 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Congressional Approval or Disapproval of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Pub. L. 85–686, §10, Aug. 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 680, provided that: "The enactment of this Act [enacting section 1335 of this title, amending sections 1333, 1336, 1337, 1351, 1352a, 1360, and former section 1364 of this title, and enacting notes set out under sections 1352 and 1366 of this title] shall not be construed to determine or indicate the approval or disapproval by the Congress of the executive agreement known as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade."
§ 609.20 What are the application requirements for a grant under this part? In order to receive a grant under this part, an institution must submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may prescribe. The application must contain— ( a ) A description of the activities to be carried out with grant funds and how those activities will improve graduate educational opportunities for Black and low-income students and lead to greater financial independence for the applicant;
( b ) A description of how the applicant is making a substantial contribution to the legal, medical, dental, veterinary or other graduate education opportunities for Black Americans;
( c ) An assurance from each applicant requesting in excess of $500,000 that 50 percent of the costs of all the activities to be carried out under the grant will come from non-Federal sources;
( d ) A description of how the grant funds will be used so that they will supplement, and to the extent practical, increase the funds that would otherwise be made available for the activities to be carried out under the grant and in no case supplant those funds, for the activities described in § 609.10(a)(1) through § 609.10(a)(14);
( e ) An assurance that the proposed activities in the application are in accordance with any State plan that is applicable to the institution; and
( f ) ( 1 ) A comprehensive development plan as described in § 609.21; or
( 2 ) If an applicant has already submitted a comprehensive development plan as described in § 609.21, a description of the progress the applicant has made in carrying out the goals of its plan.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0113) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063d and 1066(b)(2))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 397.92

 398.83

 399.52

 400.51

 401.37

 401.89

 402.37

 402.90

 403.28

 403.73

 404.27

 405.26

 405.33

 405.81

 406.62

 407.37

 408.10

 408.62

 409.97

 410.12

 410.62

 411.28

 411.96

 412.83

 413.66

 414.81

 415.38

 416.36

 417.03

 417.68

 506,465

 513,633

 519,094

 526,965

 533,839

 538,011

 541,873

 546,149

 549,223

 552,871

 557,261

 565,343

 565,916

 569,851

 576,516

 582,712

 588,767

 593,094

 604,384

 605,643

 609,848

 615,415

 621,170

 628,563

 635,647

 645,510

 650,420

 658,894

 664,711

 670,373

 3,238

 3,153

 3,134

 3,071

 5,457

 5,445

 3,089

 4,068

 3,941

 3,899

 0

 8,825

 1,419

 2,920

 1,393

 2,874

 2,444

 1,377

 5,752

 1,865

 2,838

 2,577

 2,568

 2,584

 2,165

 6,169

 2,428

 2,149

 1,827

 1,863

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SAN LUIS RESERVOIR FEDERAL November 2, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2004 RUN DATE:

FEDERAL

CHANGE CHANGE

PACHECO

PUMP

TOTALS 171,976 0 14,294 67,272

FEDERAL

PUMP ADJ

FEDERAL

GEN

 8,068

 7,168

 5,461

 7,871

 6,874

 4,172

 3,862

 4,276

 3,074

 3,648

 4,390

 8,082

 573

 3,935

 6,665

 6,196

 6,055

 4,327

 11,290

 1,259

 4,205

 5,567

 5,755

 7,393

 7,084

 9,863

 4,910

 8,474

 5,817

 5,662

 537

 454

 516

 517

 481

 518

 552

 540

 537

 543

 542

 491

 524

 498

 525

 535

 494

 491

 420

 303

 451

 536

 436

 455

 445

 402

 418

 402

 317

 414

2,297

2,301

2,259

2,210

4,704

4,639

2,273

3,236

3,247

3,051

-688

7,852

748

2,233

533

2,065

-2,383

535

4,772

1,432

2,025

1,775

1,744

1,785

1,400

5,122

1,556

1,998

1,370

1,181

ELEV STORAGE

 94,532

 91,991

 94,292

 96,551

 98,761

 103,465

 108,104

 110,377

 113,613

 116,860

 119,911

 119,223

 127,075

 127,823

 130,056

 130,589

 132,654

 130,271

 130,806

 135,578

 137,010

 139,035

 140,810

 142,554

 144,339

 145,739

 150,861

 152,417

 154,415

 155,785

 156,966

FEDERAL

STORAGE

COMMENTS : 

VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

 89,694

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-4,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-4,000